<PAGE>
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-SB/A
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES OF
SMALL BUSINESS ISSUERS UNDER SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its charter)
---------------------------------------- ---------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
Nevada 88-0293171
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th Floor
San Diego, California 92108
Issuer's telephone number, including area code 619-209-6077
Securities to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which
to be so registered each class is to be registered
None N/A
--------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
On October 11, 1999, the Registrant had outstanding 26,834,070 shares of Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share.
<PAGE>
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY OVERVIEW
An investment in securities of The Majestic Companies, Ltd. is highly
speculative and investors should carefully consider the risks set forth below
and the risks described in the RISK FACTORS section beginning on page 15 of this
Form 10-SB before investing in the Company's securities.
The Majestic Companies, Ltd. was incorporated under the laws of the State
of Nevada on December 3, 1992 under the name of Rhodes, Wolters & Associates,
Inc. ("Rhodes"). In May 1998, Rhodes changed its name to SKYTEX International,
Inc. ("SKYTEX"), and in December, 1998, merged with a Delaware corporation named
"The Majestic Companies, Ltd." SKYTEX had no material operations during the
period prior to this merger. The Majestic Companies, Ltd., the Delaware
corporation SKYTEX acquired in the merger, had operations and formerly did
business as "Majestic Motor Car Company, Ltd." and prior to that "Majestic
Minerals, Ltd." As a part of the merger SKYTEX's corporate name was changed to
"The Majestic Companies, Ltd." (hereinafter the Nevada post-merger corporation
is referred to as the "Company"). Majestic Minerals, Ltd. was a British
Columbia, Canada corporation that changed its name to Majestic Motor Car Company
in April, 1997. Subsequent to the name change, in March 1998 Majestic Motor Car
Company merged with and into The Majestic Companies, Ltd., the Delaware
corporation SKYTEX acquired in December, 1998. The Delaware corporation had no
prior material operations and was organized for the purpose of reincorporating
under the laws of the state of Delaware.
To consummate the SKYTEX merger, stockholders of the pre-merger Delaware
corporation "The Majestic Companies, Ltd.", were issued one share of SKYTEX
common stock with par value of $.001 for each one (1.00) share of common stock
owned as of December 11, 1998, of the pre-merger Delaware Corporation "The
Majestic Companies, Ltd."
The Company engages in the business of manufacturing, leasing and selling
modular structures such as classrooms, office buildings, medical facilities and
telecommunication equipment shelters by its subsidiary, Majestic Modular
Buildings, Ltd., and, the acquisition and lease of modular buildings by its
subsidiary, Majestic Financial, Ltd. Additionally, the Company has developed and
is in the process of marketing a school bus safety restraint device known as the
SAFE-T-BAR(R) through its third subsidiary, Majestic Transportation Products,
Ltd.
The Company is a development stage company and therefore is subject to
certain risks going forward including the risk of being unable to continue as a
going concern. To date, the operations of the Company's business units have not
generated sufficient earnings to cover the cost of operations. Therefore, the
Company has incurred a net loss of; $301,952 for year end 1997 (audited),
$2,373,288 for year end 1998 (audited) and $2,157,324 for the first nine months
of 1999 (unaudited). To date, revenues have been generated from the manufacture
and sale of Modular Buildings; $395,857 for year end 1998 (audited) and
$2,172,325 for the first nine months of 1999 (unaudited), and from the leasing
of modular classroom buildings owned by the Company; $117,876 for the first nine
months of 1999. In order for the Company to continue as a going concern, it will
be necessary to raise additional equity and or debt financing to cover the cost
of future operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
attain such additional financing on terms satisfactory to the Company.
Also due to the fact that the Company is a development stage company, the
management team has no direct operating experience in the manufacture of modular
buildings prior to inception of modular construction operations by the pre-
merger Delaware corporation, The Majestic Companies, Ltd. in April of 1998 and
no direct prior operating experience in the safety transportation industry prior
to development of the Company's transportation safety product by the pre-merger
Delaware corporation, The Majestic Companies, Ltd. in the first quarter of 1998.
2
<PAGE>
BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-GENERAL BACKGROUND
The Company's core business is the manufacturing and sale or leasing of
modular classrooms. The pre-merger Delaware corporation, The Majestic Companies,
Ltd., began these operations in April of 1998. These classrooms are being sold
and leased to California school districts as well as to third party dealers
including G.E. Capital Modular Space, a division of General Electric. The
Company's modular classroom structures are engineered and constructed in
accordance with pre-approved building plans, commonly referred to as "P.C.'s" or
"pre-checked plans", that conform to structural and seismic safety
specifications adopted by the California Department of State Architects ("DSA").
The DSA regulates all California school construction on public land and the
DSA's standards are believed to be more rigorous than the standards that
typically regulate other classes of commercial portable structures. The Company
also manufactures modular re-locatable structures for use as offices, temporary
construction facilities, medical facilities and equipment bunkers for the
cellular telecommunications industry. These structures are designed and
manufactured to conform to Department of Housing (DOH) specifications.
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT
Many of the school districts located within larger cities of the State are
experiencing space restrictions for expansion. The State regulates the amount
of open land required for each student enrolled in each school. Many of the
most crowded schools are at their maximum land to building use ratio. In order
for these schools to add modular classrooms and conserve their land use they
must build compliant two story structures. The Company is currently attempting
to obtain DSA approval for a clustered modular building that would comprise
eight to ten classrooms in a two-story building.
As a result of net enrollment increase in California schools and budgetary
constraints experienced by the state, California public schools are among the
most crowded in the nation. As the country's fastest growing State, California
public classrooms have experienced class sizes averaging 35 students to one
teacher. In an attempt to improve the quality of public education offered to
the state's student population, California voters approved Proposition 1A. This
bond measure provides $9.2 billion aimed at lowering the teacher to student
class size ratio to 20 students per one teacher. The aim of the bond measure
therefore is to provide funding for additional classroom space, teaching staff,
and, curriculum.
With the passage of this bond measure, Proposition 1A, classroom space
became an issue. The public school system administrators were anxious to create
a better learning environment for the students through the addition of extra
classrooms. In the formula for class size reduction, California, therefore,
earmarked money for the purchase of modular classrooms for each school district
that identified the need and presented a proposal to the State. Once approved,
the State sends $35,000 per class to the individual school district for the
purchase of each modular classroom. A 1976 State adopted Senate Bill (SB50)
mandated at least 30% of all new classroom space added using State funds must be
re-locatable unless re-locatable classrooms are not available, or, the terrain
of the school property
3
<PAGE>
being utilized would make the use of re-locatable classrooms impracticable.
Proposition 1A, coupled with Senate Bill (SB50, has increased the demand for re-
locatable modular classrooms.
Recently approved public school bond measures to assist school districts in
meeting classroom size reduction goals include: Prop. 1A and Prop. MM, which
collectively provide an aggregate of over $10.7 billion to education facilities
for programs to reduce class size, to relieve overcrowding, to accommodate
student enrollment growth, to repair older schools and to obtain additional
teaching staff.
Since classroom staffing and curriculum development must be considered
within the scope of bond measure funding, it is difficult to ascertain precisely
the amount of funding these bond measures will allow school districts to utilize
toward modular classroom acquisitions. These bond measures funds, nonetheless,
provide school districts with a budgetary allowance to comply with classroom
size reduction.
Modular re-locatable classrooms cost significantly less and take much less
time to construct and install than conventional school facilities. Currently,
modular classroom space costs $30 per square foot, versus, $125 per square foot
for traditional non re-locatable classroom construction. Also, their use permits
a school district to relocate the units as student enrollments shift. Most
importantly, the Company's modular products provide added flexibility to school
districts in financing the costs of adding classroom space because modular
classrooms are considered personal property that can be financed out of a
district's operating budget rather than by Bond facility only. Although there
can be no assurance, the Company believes these factors will continue to fuel
the demand for modular re-locatable classrooms.
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-LEASING OPERATIONS
The Company entered into an agreement in May 1999 to purchase a selected
number of modular buildings currently under lease by several School districts in
California from Custom Modular Structures, located in Pleasanton, California.
The modular buildings, valued at approximately $200,000, were purchased in
exchange for 390,000 Company shares of Common Stock. The lease contracts are for
terms of between 12 and 46 months. At the end of the current contract term, the
Company believes the modular buildings will have a residual value of $150,000.
Presently, the Company has a total of 14 modular classrooms under lease to
various school districts. Of the 14 modular classrooms under lease, 13 of these
were leased in 1999, and, 1 was under lease in 1998. Although there can be no
assurance, the Company hopes that given the present demand for modular
buildings, the Company will have the opportunity to re-lease the buildings under
essentially the same terms and conditions.
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-DEPENDENCE ON ONE OR FEW MAJOR CUSTOMERS
During fiscal year 1999 the Company recognized approximately forty percent
(40%) of its revenues from Cal-American Building Co., Inc.,("Cal-American"), a
California corporation which subsequently filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy and
ceased operations.
In April of 1998, Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., entered into a
subcontract agreement with Cal-American Building Company, Inc., to manufacture
an order of re-locatable classrooms for a client, GE Capital Modular Space.
Also, at this time, Majestic purchased raw materials from Cal-American, and,
obtained licensing rights from Cal-American to utilize its PC's (Plan Checks)
for the manufacture of these units. The Company
4
<PAGE>
has obtained contracts from new customers that replace the revenues from Cal-
American, and does not expect the loss of Cal-American to materially, adversely
affect the Company's operations.
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-MARKETING STRATEGY
The Company has approached marketing of its modular structures in a common-
sense, long-term fashion. The Company developed or obtained architectural plans
that are or have been previously approved, obtained contracts with school
districts for long-term orders, hired personnel with modular construction
experience, and negotiated favorable terms with suppliers of construction
materials and parts that the Company believes are favorable. In addition, the
Company is designing a new multiple story clustered modular classroom structure
for DSA review.
Production output for 1998 was 35 units built and 12 units sold, in 1999
there were 70 units built and 53 units sold. At present, the Company's modular
production capacity is capable of one (1) standard 24' x 40' unit per 1.5 days,
giving it an annual production capacity of 240 units per year. The Company
believes it can increase this capacity to 1 unit per day, or, 360 units annually
with the addition of automation equipment, i.e., overhead cranes. The Company
also plans on adding at least one additional manufacturing facility within one
(1) year to increase its current output capacity. The Company believes that this
growth strategy is warranted to gain market share early and help ensure
stability and profit margin for the long term.
The goal of the marketing effort is to gain additional market share through
a concentrated campaign of: direct contact with customers using in-house
marketing representatives, a high visibility presence at modular industry trade
shows, open bids, and print advertisements carefully placed in industry trade
periodicals. Management believes that this comprehensive marketing plan will
help establish the Company as a market leader in the construction of quality
modular structures.
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-COMPETITION
There are approximately 19 companies currently building modular structures
in California. The largest of these companies, Modtech, Inc.("Modtech"),
operates from multiple facilities located in Lathrop and Perris, California.
Other primary competitors in California for modular structures include American
Modular Systems and Design Mobile Systems. Outside of California, the Company's
competitors include a number of publicly traded companies currently
manufacturing pre-fabricated modular structures, and pre-fabricated housing.
This industry group includes; Miller Business Systems (MBSI NASD), Nobility
Homes (HOBH NASD), Cavalier Homes (CAV NYSE), Palm Harbor Homes (PHHM NASD) and
Clayton Homes (CMH NYSE). All of these competitors have capital and other
resources greater than the Company and could adversely impact the Company's
marketing plans.
MODULAR STRUCTURE PRODUCTS-POTENTIAL ACQUISTIONS: WALDEN STRUCTURES INC.
On September 29, 1999, the Company entered into preliminary discussions to
acquire Walden Structures and Constructions, Inc. ("Walden"), a privately held
manufacturer of modular structures primarily for use by commercial enterprises.
The Company believes the addition of Walden's operations could add significantly
to the Company's annual revenues and allow the Company to become more involved
in manufacturing modular structures other than classrooms.
No formal Letter of Intent outlining the price, terms, and timetable of the
proposed acquisition has been executed and there can be no assurance that a
transaction will be consummated with Walden.
5
<PAGE>
SAFETY RESTRAINT PRODUCTS-GENERAL BACKGROUND
In the U.S. there are approximately 24,000,000 students transported daily
to and from school utilizing approximately 440,000 school buses. Less than 20%
of these buses have any type of occupant restraint. No federal requirement
currently exists for requiring restraints to be installed on these school buses
and this lack of federal regulation has resulted in five separate states (NY,
NJ, FL, LA, CA)adopting their own occupant restraint regulations, three of which
have just passed in 1999 (California, Florida & Louisiana), with over 20 states
having planned or pending legislation. During the past five years New Jersey and
New York have mandated two-point lap belts to be installed in all new school
buses purchased and as a result more than 80% of the school buses in these two
states now have seat belts. Although the law in these two states require the
belts to be installed, there is no law mandating that the students wear them and
while questioning officials from these areas, it was stated that the percentage
of students voluntarily buckling up was well below 50%.
The SAFE-T-BAR(R) is a passive restraint and one of it's main advantages is
that it has an almost 100% use rate. The design requires the occupant to lift,
sit and allow the bar to rest down in place and requires virtually no attention
from the driver. The SAFE-T-BAR(R) is patent pending and has been designed to
lock in the down position during the events that take place during a collision
thus holding the occupant within the padded seating area.
The cost to retrofit a school bus with the SAFE-T-BAR(R) is less than the
cost to add seat belts, as the SAFE-T-BAR(R) does not require the seat to be
changed. At the point of manufacture, the SAFE-T-BAR(R) cost is approximately
the same as that of a lap-shoulder belt restraint although a lap-shoulder belt
system reduces the typical three position seat to a two position seat resulting
in the need to purchase additional buses and adding an additional financial
burden.
With 440,000 school buses in the U.S. and an average of 22 seats per school
bus, this represents a potential market for 9.7 million restraints. Industry
analysts predict the growth of the industry to continue at around 2% to 4% per
year.(Industry statistics source: School Bus Fleet Magazine Annual Fact Book
1999).
SAFETY RESTRAINT PRODUCTS-SAFE-T-BAR(R)
The Company has the exclusive manufacturing and marketing rights for an
innovative new product known as the SAFE-T-BAR(R) that the Company's management
believes has the potential to become a preferred solution for on-board school
bus passenger restraint systems. The general product design, closely
approximates the type of lap bar safety restraint systems commonly found on high
velocity amusement park rides. The Company plans to produce and currently is
marketing the product to school bus manufacturers and operators nationwide,
including governmental agencies and school systems.
As of March 3, 1999 the SAFE-T-BAR(R) completed and passed the full
complement of testing required under FMVSS 222 & 302 (Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards) and is ready for market roll-out. The test results were
delivered to the Company in a comprehensive fifty page report rendered by KARCO
Engineering, a Federally approved collision testing facility located in
Adelanto, CA. Now that all federal compliance testing milestones for the SAFE-T-
BAR(R) school bus passenger restraint have been met, the Company is moving
quickly into the Pilot Program stage of this new product on a state by state
basis. Glenn Gruber, Marketing Director for Majestic Transportation Products,
Ltd., is currently in talks with transportation officials and/or legislators in
the States of Minnesota, New Jersey, Delaware,
6
<PAGE>
Florida, Illinois, Tennessee, New Mexico and New York that have requested
information about the SAFE-T-BAR(R) passenger restraint system.
The Company conducted its first pilot program with the Oceanside
(CA)Unified School District and recently completed the program on August 24,
1999. The program received high marks from the Transportation Staff as well as
the many bus drivers who drove the SAFE-T-BAR(R)'s outfitted bus. The Company
has not sold any SAFE-T-BAR(R)'s to date and has no existing contracts or orders
to produce SAFE-T-BAR(R)'s.
SAFETY RESTRAINT PRODUCTS-SAFE-T-SEAT(TM)
The Company is in the process of developing a new seat design for school
buses, officially labeled the "SAFE-T-SEAT(TM)" restraint system. The Company
envisions that the SAFE-T-SEAT(TM) will enhance students' safety in school buses
and hopes to commence the marketing of SAFE-T-SEAT(TM) devices in the year 2000.
The Company expects to release details of the new SAFE-T-SEAT(TM) design in the
near future.
SAFETY RESTRAINT PRODUCTS-INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
SAFE-T-BAR(R). The Company has the exclusive right and license to
manufacture and sell the SAFE-T-BAR(R) product under a Patent that is owned
individually by Adrian Corbett, the Company's Vice President of Engineering. The
license from Mr. Corbett is for a period of seven (7) years renewable for two(2)
additional terms of five (5) years. The mark SAFE-T-BAR(R) is a trademark
registered by the Company with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office("PTO").
SAFE-T-SEAT(TM). The Company's new proposed product SAFE-T-SEAT(TM) is the
subject of a patent application currently pending with the PTO filed by Adrian
Corbett and the Company has applied to register this mark with the PTO as a
trademark.
SAFETY RESTRAINT PRODUCTS-AMOUNT SPENT ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
During the last two (2) fiscal years the Company has spent approximately
$188,810.00 on research and development activities.
SAFETY RESTRAINT PRODUCTS-COMPETITION IN SCHOOL BUS SAFETY RESTRAINT INDUSTRY
The Company's competition in the safety restraint products is with
companies that produce different safety restraint devices for school buses such
as Seat Belts. The Company has no knowledge of any other company that produces a
lap bar restraint device similar to the SAFE-T-BAR(R).
Most of the larger sized C & D type school buses currently rely on the
concept of "compartmentalization" to ensure the safety of onboard passengers.
This is a passive type of protection that is meant to contain the child within a
structurally reinforced passenger compartment of padded high-back seats and
crash barriers. There is no assurance that this "compartmentalization" approach
will not continue to be the dominant approach in the school bus safety restraint
industry or that one of the Company's safety restraint competitors will not
succeed in marketing a competing product as the chosen lap belt solution.
Further, there is no assurance that the federal government, the states,
local governments, and/or school districts will not opt to use seat belts
instead of the Company's SAFE-T-BAR(R) product to enhance school bus safety.
7
<PAGE>
Companies such as Bus Belts Development, Indiana Mills, BESI and Kinedyne
are involved in the manufacturing of seat belts and are competitors of the
Company.
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD.-EMPLOYEES
As of October, 1999, the Company has forty-four (44) employees, none of
whom have entered into an employment agreement with the Company, other than the
Company's President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, Francis A.
Zubrowski. The Company has no collective bargaining agreements covering any of
its employees, has not experienced any material labor disruption and is unaware
of any efforts or plans to organize its employees. The Company considers
relations with its employees to be good.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
BACKGROUND. Some computers, software and other equipment include
programming code in which calendar year data is abbreviated to only two digits.
As a result of this design decision, some of these systems could fail to operate
or fail to produce correct results if "00" is interpreted to mean 1900, rather
than 2000. These problems are widely expected to increase in frequency and
severity as the year "2000" approaches and are commonly referred to as the
"Millennium Bug" or "Year 2000 Problem."
ASSESSMENT. The Year 2000 Problem could affect computers, software and
other equipment used, operated or maintained by the Company. Accordingly, the
Company is reviewing its internal computer programs and systems to ensure that
the programs and systems will be Year 2000 compliant. The Company presently
believes that its computer systems will be Year 2000 compliant in a timely
manner. However, while the estimated cost of these efforts is not expected to be
material to the Company's financial position or any year's results of
operations, there can be assurance to this effect.
INTERNAL INFRASTRUCTURE. The Company believes that it has reviewed and
assessed all of the major computers, software applications, and related
equipment used in connection with its internal operations that would potentially
require modification, upgrade, or replacement to minimize the possibility of a
material disruption to its business. The Company's internal review of such
systems did not identify any material Year 2000 Problem. If the Company had
identified an exposure to the "Year 2000 Problem," Management currently
estimates the total cost of internal reprogramming of its software products and
the upgrading of purchased hardware and software would not be material. While
this is management's best current estimate, items outside management's control
relating to the "Year 2000 Problem" may impact the Company. The Company
estimates the total cost to the Company of completing any required
modifications, upgrades, or replacements of these internal systems would not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business or results of
operations.
SYSTEMS OTHER THAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS. In addition to computers
and related systems, the operations of office and facilities equipment such as
fax machines, photocopiers, telephone switches, security systems, and other
common devices may be affected by the Year 2000 Problem.
DISCLAIMER. The discussion of the Company's efforts, and management's
expectations, relating to Year 2000 compliance are forward-looking statements.
The Company's Year 2000 compliance status and the level of incremental costs
associated therewith, if any, could be adversely impacted by, among other
things, the availability and cost of programming and testing resources, vendors'
ability to
8
<PAGE>
modify proprietary software, and unanticipated problems identified in ongoing
internal compliance reviews.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Management Discussion and Analysis should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in
this Registration Statement.
GENERAL
Since its inception in Nevada in 1992, under the name Rhodes, Wolters &
Associates, Inc., the Company has undergone a succession of developmental
changes, ultimately bringing it to focus on its current operations carried out
by three wholly owned subsidiaries. The manufacture and sale of re-locatable
modular buildings by its subsidiary, Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., and, the
acquisition and lease of modular buildings by the subsidiary, Majestic
Financial, Ltd. Additionally, the Company has developed and is in the process of
marketing a school bus safety restraint device known as the SAFE-T-BAR(R)
through its third subsidiary, Majestic Transportation Products, Ltd.
Rhodes, Wolters & Associates changed its name to SKYTEX International, Inc.
in May 1998 and in December 1998 merged with the Majestic Companies, Ltd., a
Delaware corporation that formerly did business as Majestic Minerals, Ltd.
("Majestic Minerals") and Majestic Motor Car Company. Majestic Minerals was
incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada in 1995. In April 1997
Majestic Minerals changed its name to Majestic Motor Car Company, Ltd. and in
March 1998, to reincorporate under the laws of Delaware, Majestic Motor Car
Company, Ltd. merged with and into The Majestic Companies, Ltd., a Delaware
corporation created for that purpose. Subsequently, in December 1998, The
Majestic Companies, Ltd. was merged with and into SKYTEX, which was the
surviving corporation in the merger. As a part of the merger SKYTEX's name was
changed to The Majestic Companies, Ltd., the name under which it now operates.
Prior to consummation of the merger, SKYTEX had no material operations. The
financial and other information contained in this Registration Statement
therefore describes the operations of Majestic Motor Car Company and the pre-
merger Delaware corporation The Majestic Companies, Ltd.
In April of 1997 Majestic Motor Car Company, Ltd., entered into a Master
Licensing agreement with World Transport Authority. The licensing agreement
allowed Majestic Motor Car Company, Ltd., to market and sell micro-manufacturing
facilities that were capable of producing a low cost, all composite vehicle,
designed especially for use in Mexico and South America. After waiting nearly a
year for completion of a prototype composite vehicle by World Transport
Authority, and, not knowing when a production model would be completed, Majestic
Motor Car Company, Ltd., determined that it was in its best interests to abandon
the project. The licensing agreement was terminated in June of 1998 with the
mutual consent of World Transport Authority and Majestic Motor Car Company,
Ltd."
The Company's manufacturing division, Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.,
which began operations in April of 1998 as a subsidiary of the pre-merger
Delaware corporation, The Majestic Companies, Ltd., provides Department of State
Architects (DSA), and, Department of Housing (DOH), certified modular buildings
to public, private and commercial consumers throughout the State of California.
Buildings are manufactured to meet customer specifications while complying with
specifically
9
<PAGE>
licensed design plans known as PC's (Previously Checked-State plans). Typically,
the market for DSA approved modular classrooms experiences a seasonal demand
during the first four months of the calendar year when school districts prepare
for the new school year later in the Fall. However, the Company's management
believes recent legislation and statewide funding has resulted in a higher year-
round demand to satisfy an increasing student population and statewide mandates.
Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., is in the process of developing a two story
modular classroom design that has been inspired by the need for schools to
maximize the utilization of economic resources and limited lands available to
them. The Company's management feels that the above need, as well as, state
mandated classroom size reduction policies and statewide enhanced funding of
nearly 11 billion dollars, will continue to substantiate the production and
demand of modular classrooms for years to come.
With the placement of its first single unit operational lease, Majestic
Financial, Ltd. began operations in December of 1998. Its primary mission is to
supply modular classrooms for lease to school districts. This is accomplished by
directly providing modular classrooms for lease, or, through the acquisition of
existing leased fleets from small to medium size entities. The focus is to
establish an asset base that will continuously provide a turnover of revenue
from the renewal of existing leases. Although Majestic Financial, Ltd.'s current
fleet is only a modest fourteen units, Majestic Financial, Ltd., is seeking to
augment its fleet while providing schools with limited budgetary resources the
ability to obtain much needed classroom space under affordable lease terms.
The SAFE-T-BAR(R) school bus safety restraint has been designed to fulfill
a critical need in the area of school bus safety transportation. Majestic
Transportation Products, Ltd.'s development of a safety restraint device similar
to lap bars found on high velocity amusement park rides was designed to provide
an effective passive restraint system for school buses. The SAFE-T-BAR(R), as
the device is known, has passed a battery of computerized, sled, and federal
testing requirements. The Company's management passive application of the device
while in a 'down' position provides student riders an increased measure of
security not found in conventional seat belts which have proven expensive to
install, easily vandalized, and, not always utilized by the student rider.
Currently, Majestic Transportation Products, Ltd., is aggressively marketing the
SAFE-T-BAR(R) throughout the United States with emphasis being placed on the
states with existing and pending legislation requiring safety restraints for
school buses. A test program with a school bus retrofitted with the SAFE-T-
BAR(R) in Oceanside, California has resulted in successful utilization of a
pilot program.
Beginning in 1998 with the start up of Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.,
the Company experienced a modest revenue flow along with the costs and growing
pains of venturing into a new business. At the quarter ending September 30,
1999, the Company's modular division has posted an increase of 500% in sales
compared to its total first year results. The Company desires to augment
Majestic Financial, Ltd., lease fleet in a modest fashion and establish an asset
base capable of generating a consistent stream of revenues to complement its
modular manufacturing operations. Revenues generated by leases this year have
been modest and have provided the Company with a source of liquid cash
alternatives to fund operations. After two years of development and testing, the
Company expects that Majestic Transportation, Ltd.'s extensive SAFE-T-BAR(R)
marketing efforts will start resulting in its first revenues within the first
quarter of year 2000.
Although, the Company has experienced growth in revenues since the
inception of operations in 1998, the Company has experienced losses in each year
of its operations, and, there can be no assurance, that, in the future, the
Company will sustain revenue growth or
10
<PAGE>
achieve profitability. The Company has identified several steps it feels will
begin to move it toward profitability: (I) provide timely and adequate working
capital for the modular division, (II) further automate the modular production
process, which the Company has started with the purchase of an overhead crane
system, (III) pursue volume purchase discounts for raw materials, (IV)
capitalize on federal and state legislation requiring safety restraints on
school buses, and, begin realizing sales from, Majestic Transportation Products,
Ltd., marketing efforts, (V) continual improvement and development of safety
restraint devices within the same transportation division, and, (VI) control
all-around general overhead cost.
Further, as a development stage company, purchasers of the Company's
securities are subject to the risk that the Company will be unable to continue
as a going concern. See Footnote O to the Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997
NET SALES. In fiscal year ending December 31, 1998, the Company achieved
annual sales of $395,857. Net sales in 1997 were non-existent since the Company
had not yet commenced operations, and/or, it was still in a research and
development phase. The 1998 year end sales consisted primarily of the modular
division sales which commenced operations in April of 1998. These sales
comprised 99% of the year's total sales. Sales for this division were modest due
to the fact that start-up and `growing' issues occupied the focus of this
division in its first year. Furthermore, sales for the year were minimal as
reflected by the modular division's attention to assembling a sales force toward
the last quarter of the year. The remaining 1% of sales for 1998 was comprised
of lease revenue from the Company's lease division, which had just commenced
operations in December of 1998.
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for the modular division totaled $425,281 in
1998. This was primarily due to the fact the Company's modular division was in
the process of establishing and improving its labor efficiency and materials
acquisition during this start up year. In 1997 there was no cost of sales since
the Company had not yet commenced operations, and/or, it was still in a research
and development phase.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and Development expenses in 1998 reached
$191,687. These research and development expenses were primarily comprised of
operations related to the development of the SAFE-T-BAR(R), which had just begun
research in January of 1998. There were no research and development expenses in
1997.
SELLING AND MARKETING. Selling and marketing expenses for 1998 were
$144,044. The Company's corporate headquarters accounted for $90,000 of these
expenses, $35,750 was within the modular division and the balance of $18,294 was
a result of marketing within the transportation division. Total selling and
marketing expenses increased slightly over 4 times to $144,044 in 1998 from
$35,000 in 1997. The increase was a result of the Company's concentration on
supporting its newly commenced operations.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses increased
nine times to $1,987,527 in 1998 from $214,866 in 1997, due in part to
management additions, re-location of both the current corporate headquarters and
the modular division, accounting and legal costs related to the start up of the
modular division, financing activities, and the amortization expense of a master
license once held by the Company in 1997 to market an all composite vehicle
internationally.
11
<PAGE>
OTHER EXPENSES. Other expenses decreased 63% from $52,086 in 1997 to
$19,178 in 1998. This was due to the amortization expense of a master license
that was obtained by Majestic Motor Car Company, Ltd. in 1997 to market an all
composite vehicle internationally. In 1998 the master license agreement was
terminated and expensed as described in the General and Administrative
discussions above. Interest expense totaled $1,428 in 1998, a result of
equipment financing for the modular division. There was no interest expense in
1997.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND 1998
NET SALES. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 1999 were
$2,290,201, a 20.9 times increase from $109,506 in the same period in 1998. This
increase was primarily due to an increase in modular product sales of $2,172,325
through September 1999, which increased 20 times from $107,640 in the same
period in 1998. This increase was a direct result of a concerted sales effort
beginning in the last quarter of 1998. Lease sales comprised $113,725 through
September 30, 1999. There was no sales resulting from leases for the same period
in 1998.
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales increased 20.6 times to $2,072,429 through
September 1999 from $100,494 in the same period 1998. The increase was
attributable mostly to the Company's modular division, which posted an increase
of 20.4 times to $2,055,762 from $100,494 for the same period in 1998. The
Company's transportation division posted a total of $16,667 in royalty fees
through September 1999. There was no royalties paid for the same period in 1998.
Gross profit percentage increased to 10% from a negative (7%) in 1998.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and Development expenses increased 45%
to $198,043 through the period September 1999 from $136,847 in the same period
1998. The increase resulted primarily from additional consulting fees and other
costs related to ongoing development projects.
SELLING AND MARKETING. Selling and Marketing expenses increased 43% to
$165,993 through the period September 1999 from $116,033 in the same period
1998. The increase was a result of the Company's overall operational expansions
and concerted efforts to market its products.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and Administrative expenses increased
37% to $1,959,840 through the period September 1999 from $1,428,326 in the same
period 1998. This was partly due to an increase in consultant, managerial, and
professional compensations, financing activities, and, an increase in product
insurance coverage and rent factors.
OTHER EXPENSES. Other expenses increased 67% to $27,242 for the period
ending September 1999 from $16,278 in the same period 1998. This was primarily
due to an increase of depreciation and amortization expenses resulting from the
acquisition of additional capital assets. Interest expenses increased twenty-
eight folds to $23,979 for the period ending September 1999 from $828 in the
same period 1998. Interest expense was primarily a result of repayment of debt
acquired in 1999.
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND 1998
NET SALES. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 1999 were
$647,471, a six-fold increase from $109,506 in the same period ending 1998. The
sales consisted of $554,910 in modular product sales for the three periods
ending September 1999, compared to $109,506 for the same period in 1998, a five-
fold increase. The increase is directly attributable to a structured sales
effort by the modular division. The Company's leasing division accounted for
$90,025 in period
12
<PAGE>
sales for 1999. There were no lease sales in the same period 1998. A total of
$70,369 of this period's lease sales were a result of the Company selling off
future revenue streams from a portion of its lease fleet.
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 1999
totaled $497,670, a five-fold increase from $100,494 in the same period ending
1998. The cost of sales increased for the modular division in that period five-
fold to $483,503 in 1999 from $100,494 in the same period ending 1998. The
Company's transportation division experienced a total of $5,555 in royalty
expenses for this period. There was no royalty expense for the same period in
1998. The leasing division experienced $8,612 in cost of sales for this period
in 1999. There was no leasing division cost for the same period in 1998. Gross
profit percentage for this period increased to 23% in 1999 from 8% in the same
period last year. The period's gross profit was affected by the period sale of
future revenue streams from the leasing division.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and Development expenses increased by
49% to $76,014 for the three-month period ending September 30, 1999, from
$51,115 in the same period in 1998. This was primarily a result of the
transportation division continuing improvement of the SAFE-T-BAR(R) as well as
the development of a new product, the SAFE-T-SEAT(TM), a product incorporating
the features of the SAFE-T-BAR(R) on an original seat design.
SELLING AND MARKETING. Selling and marketing expense increased by 48% to
$60,331 for the three months period ending September 30, 1999, from $40,677 in
the same period in 1998. The increase in expense is largely attributable to the
modular and transportation divisions marketing of their products in 1999.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses increased
25% to $736,222 for the three-month period ending September 30, 1999, from
$584,061 in 1998. This was largely the result of increases in operational
overheads and corporate financing activities.
OTHER EXPENSES. Other expenses increased 86% to $10,230 for the three
months period ending September 30, 1999, from $5,502 in the same period 1998.
This was primarily due to depreciation expense from the modular division's
acquisition of capital equipment in the period ending 1999. Interest expense
increased for the period 15.8 times to $11,516, from $729 in the same three-
month period ended 1998. The interest is largely attributable to repayment of
debt financing and loans.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has largely financed its operations through private placements
of common and preferred stock, raising net proceeds of approximately $2.5
million from sales of these securities. Additionally, the Company has raised
approximately $1 million through a Section 504 offering in 1999. From December
31, 1997 through September 30, 1999, the Company has invested approximately
$686,582 (net of accumulated depreciation) in leasehold improvements, plant and
office equipment to support its developmental, production and administrative
activities. An additional $91,996 has been invested into licenses of trademarks
and PC's. The Company anticipates no other material commitments in the near term
future.
The Company's principal sources of liquidity are short and long term debt
financing, of which $615,039 remains outstanding as of September 30, 1999. Other
credit facilities of $1,250,000 for Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., and,
$2,000,000 for Majestic Transportation Products, Ltd. were intended for working
capital use, but subsequently became unavailable due to the
13
<PAGE>
fact that the lending source ceased operations and became inactive.
Additionally, the Company has recently obtained lines of credit totaling $1
million dollars, which will become available in November of 1999.
The loss of Cal-American Building Company, Inc., as a major customer did
not materially affect Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.'s, sales or market
development. Majestic has focused the development of modular sales directly with
end users, i.e., school districts or modular dealers, versus, subcontracting
work from modular manufacturers.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
During 1997, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS No. 123) Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. See Note 1 in the Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company, included in this Report on Form 10-SB, for the full
disclosure. In 1997, the Company was required to adopt Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 121 (SFAS No. 121) Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed, which prescribes
accounting and reporting standards when circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of a long-lived asset may be not recoverable. SFAS No. 121 had no impact
on the Company's financial statements.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Account Standards No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information ("SFAS 131")
in the year ended December 31, 1998. SFAS establishes standards for reporting
information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and
requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim
financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS 131 also establishes standards
for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas.
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which
separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief
operating decision maker, or decision making group, in making decisions how to
allocate resources and assess performance. The information disclosed herein,
materially represents all of the financial information related to the Company's
principal operating segment.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS
This Registration Statement on Form 10-SB contains forward-looking
statements consisting of any statement other than a recitation of historical
facts that are identified by words such as "may", "expect," "anticipate,"
"estimate," "hopes," "believes," "continue," "intends," "seeks," "contemplates,"
"suggests," "envisions" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or
comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based largely on
the Company's expectations and are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including but not limited to, those risks associated with
economic conditions generally and the economy in those areas where the Company
has or expects to have assets and operations; competitive and other factors
affecting the Company's operations, markets, products and services; those risks
associated with the Company's ability to maintain the exclusive right and
license to use the Patent owned by Adrian Corbett; those risks associated with
the Company's ability to successfully negotiate with certain customers, risks
relating to estimated contract costs, estimated losses on uncompleted contracts
and estimates regarding the percentage of completion of contracts, risks
relating to the ability of the Company to raise the funds necessary to operate,
design, develop, construct, and manage modular classrooms, risks related to the
outcome of Cal-American's Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding because Cal-American
has been one of the Company's primary customers; those risks
14
<PAGE>
involved in lobbying the appropriate governmental units or agencies in
California or elsewhere to allocate funding to school districts to purchase or
lease modular classrooms; associated costs arising out of the Company's
activities and the matters discussed in this report; risks relating to changes
in interest rates and in the availability, cost and terms of financing; risks
related to the performance of financial markets; risks related to changes in
domestic laws, regulations and taxes; risks related to changes in business
strategy or development plans; risks associated with future profitability; and
other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and in documents filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Many of these factors are
beyond the Company's control. Actual results could differ materially from these
forward-looking statements. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can
be no assurance that the forward-looking information contained in this
registration on Form 10-SB will, in fact, occur. The Company does not undertake
any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect future
events or circumstances and other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and
the documents filed or to be filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
RISK FACTORS
The securities of the Company are speculative, involve a high degree of
risk and immediate substantial dilution to the public investors, and should not
be purchased by persons who cannot afford to lose their entire investment.
Prospective investors should consider carefully the following risk factors
inherent in and affecting the Company's business and the Offering, as well as
all other information set forth in this Form 10-SB, before they invest in the
Company's Securities.
QUARTERLY FLUCTUATIONS AND SEASONALITY OF OPERATING RESULTS COULD ADVERSELY
AFFECT VALUE OF STOCK
Operating results may fluctuate on a quarterly basis due to a variety of
factors, including the cycles of orders, shipment of products from suppliers,
the number and timing of new product introductions, the timing of operation and
advertising expenditures, weather, the year end purchasing cycle, and other
factors. The Company believes that factors such as fluctuations in the quarterly
operating results could affect the value of the Company's stock.
LIMITED SAFETY PRODUCT DEMAND AND ACCEPTANCE OF SAFE-T-BAR(R) SYSTEM COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S OPERATIONS
Management believes that demand for the Company's SAFE-T-BAR(R) product
will depend in part, upon the continued interest in improving safety on public
and private bus transportation. There are no assurances that current trends
towards passenger safety will continue. Even if such trends continue, there are
no assurances that the Company's products will find acceptance with purchasers
and operators of school bus fleets, or if accepted, that such acceptance will
continue. While the conclusions reached by the Company's limited market research
have been favorable, there are no assurances that actual operating results will
reach the levels indicated by such research.
DEPENDENCE ON CERTAIN CUSTOMERS AND LACK OF LONG-TERM SUPPLY CONTRACTS WITH
CUSTOMERS COULD ADVERSELY THE COMPANY'S OPERATIONS
Although the Company sells its products both through distributors and
directly to end users, it relies significantly on relationships with several
customers. The Company does not have any long-term supply agreements with any of
15
<PAGE>
its customers. The loss of any of these customers could adversely affect the
Company's profitability.
During fiscal year 1999 the Company recognized approximately forty percent
(40%) of its revenues from Cal-American Building Co., Inc.,("Cal-American"), a
California corporation which subsequently filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy and
ceased operations. Management of the Company has obtained new customers to
replace the Cal-American revenues, and although there can be no assurance, does
not anticipate the loss of Cal-American to have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
SIGNIFICANT INDEBTEDNESS COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT COMPANY'S BUSINESS
The Company has incurred substantial short-term indebtedness and long-term
indebtedness which aggregated $228,139 and $386,900 respectively as of September
30, 1999. Funds generated by the Company's operations have been sufficient to
pay the interest on its short-term and long-term indebtedness. There can be no
assurance, however, that the Company will be able to pay the principal due on
its short-term and long-term indebtedness.
DEPENDENCE ON CERTAIN SUPPLIERS AND LACK OF LONG-TERM CONTRACTS WITH SUPPLIERS
COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
Although the Company has a favorable relationship with its suppliers,
marketplace variants such as a bankruptcy, strike, liquidation, acquisition or
merger, war, civil unrest, and atmospheric and other weather-related phenomenon
could disrupt these relationships at any time. The Company currently has no long
term supply agreements to control costs and assure availability of inventory.
Historically, the Company has generally been able to obtain its inventory
without significant difficulty or delay. There have, however, been times when
the Company was forced to pay a premium for inventory in short supply and has
experienced occasional delays. Any significant changes in supply, including
increased costs, could adversely affect planned growth. The Company has not
experienced any such significant changes in supply or increased costs, other
than the moderate effect of changes in the exchange rate of foreign currencies
against the U.S. dollar, and does not anticipate significant difficulty
regarding these matters.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT COMPANY'S BUSINESS
The Company's design, manufacturing, and construction activities are subject to
various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations designed to
protect the environment from waste emissions and the handling, treatment and
disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, as well as California, Federal and other
state regulations governing the design and construction of classroom and other
modular structures, and transportation safety devices. Although the Company
believes that it is and has been in substantial compliance with all such laws,
ordinances and regulations applicable to these operations, there may be
liabilities or conditions associated with such activities of which the Company
is not aware. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that future compliance with
such requirements will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial condition and operations.
The Company is also subject to the Federal Occupations Safety and Health
Act and other laws and regulations affecting the safety and health of employees
and the Fair Labor Standards Act and various state laws governing such matters
as minimum wage requirements, overtime and other working conditions and
citizenship requirements. The Company is also subject to various state and local
building codes and licensing requirements. Management of the Company believes
the Company has
16
<PAGE>
obtained all necessary licenses and permits and that the Company is in
substantial compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws and
regulations.
LIABILITY INSURANCE MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE
The Company is and may be subject to product liability claims arising out
of the use of the Company's products. In addition, the Company is and may be
subject to other liability resulting from its day to day operations, including
claims for negligence and environmental liability. On April 20, 1999, the
Company procured general liability, automobile and property insurance coverage
with limits in the respective amounts of $1,000,000 ($10,000,000 umbrella),
$1,000,000, and $2,250,000 ($5,000,000 umbrella). If not renewed, these
coverages are scheduled to expire on April 20, 2000. Although management of the
Company believes these coverage limits to be adequate, there can be no assurance
that these limitations are adequate or that the coverage will continue to be
available at affordable rates.
STATES OTHER THAN CALIFORNIA MAY NOT APPROVE THE COMPANY'S EXISTING MODULAR
STRUCTURES
Currently, the Company's modular classroom structures used in various
California school districts have been approved by the State of California.
There is no guarantee or assurance that other states will approve the form,
composition, size, specifications, materials or components of the Company's
modular classroom or other structures that have already been approved in
California. If other states require the Company to modify the Company's basic
modular classrooms or other structures used in California, the Company could
incur substantial costs to make these classrooms and/or other structures comply
with other states laws and building codes. The incurring of such costs could
significantly, adversely affect the Company's profitability, revenues and
operations.
REDUCED LABOR AVAILABILITY AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT THE
COMPANY'S BUSINESS
Currently skilled and unskilled labor is reasonably available in California, but
additional light industry moving to the area could reduce these labor pools.
Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the unskilled work force currently
available will be trainable as employees for the Company that such labor will
remain available. Any increase in the competition for employees could have a
significant adverse effect upon both the availability and the price of skilled
and unskilled labor.
The Company currently believes its employee relations are good. Currently,
none of the Company's employees are unionized. There can be no assurance,
however, that a collective bargaining unit will not be organized and certified
in the future. If certified in the future, a work stoppage by a collective
bargaining unit could be disruptive and have a materially adverse effect on the
Company until normal operations resume.
17
<PAGE>
DILUTION COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT VALUE OF STOCK AND PERCENTAGE OF STOCK
OWNED
The Company has Warrants and stock options outstanding that could result in
the issuance of 1,270,000 shares of Common Stock. To the extent such shares are
issued, the percentage of Common Stock held by existing Company common
stockholders will be reduced. Under certain circumstances the exercise of any or
all of the Warrants or stock options might result in further dilution of the net
tangible book value of the existing Company stockholders' shares. For the life
of the Warrants or stock options, the holders thereof are given, at nominal
cost, the opportunity to profit from a rise in the market price of the Common
Stock, if any. The holders of the Warrants or stock options may be expected to
exercise them at a time when the Company may, in all likelihood, be able to
obtain needed capital on more favorable terms. In addition, there can be no
assurance that future sales of Company stock will not result in further dilution
to existing Company common stockholders, which future sales may be made at the
discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.
FUTURE SALES PURSUANT TO RULE 144 MAY DEPRESS MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK
Approximately 15,350,555 shares of the Company's Common Stock presently
outstanding are "restricted securities" that may be resold under Rule 144
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In general, under Rule
144 a person who has satisfied a one (1) year holding period may, under certain
circumstances, sell shares of Common Stock subject to sales volume restrictions.
Rule 144 also permits the sale of shares by a person who is not an affiliate of
the Company and who has satisfied a two (2) year holding period without any
volume limitation. Sales of these shares of Common Stock under Rule 144 may have
a material adverse effect on the market price and liquidity of the Common Stock
thereby affecting a public investors ability to resell shares of the Company and
the price at which such shares can be resold.
UNCERTAINTY OF GOVERNMENT FUNDING TO SCHOOL DISTRICTS FOR PURPOSES OF PURCHASING
OR LEASING MODULAR STRUCTURES IN CALIFORNIA OR ELSEWHERE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT
THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
The Company has historically relied on the financial ability of various
school districts to purchase or lease the Company's modular classrooms. Since
the school district's source of funding originates from the government or
various state bonds, there is no guarantee that the government or state bonds
will continue to be available to provide the funding necessary for the school
districts to purchase or lease the Company's modular classrooms.
UNCERTAINTY THAT SCHOOL DISTRICTS WILL CONTINUE TO PURCHASE OR LEASE MODULAR
RELOCATABLE STRUCTURES OVER MORE FIXED, PERMANENT STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES COULD
ADVERSELY IMPACT THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
Although the Company believes the conditions affecting the market for
modular buildings to be favorable, there is no assurance that individual school
districts will opt to purchase or lease the Company's modular re-locatable
classrooms over more fixed, permanent structural alternatives.
UNCERTAINTY OF PROTECTION OF PATENTS, LICENSES, TRADE SECRETS AND TRADEMARKS
COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
The Company is the exclusive licensee for a patent related to its SAFE-T-
BAR(R) product. The Company's success depends, in part, on its ability to
maintain the exclusive right and license to manufacture and sell the SAFE-T-
BAR(R). There can be no assurance that the Patent License Agreement between the
Company and
18
<PAGE>
Adrian Corbett will continue in full force and effect. If the Patent License
Agreement was to be terminated, or the patent for the SAFE-T-BAR(R) cancelled
for any reason, the Company's prospects could be adversely affected.
There is also no assurance that Adrian Corbett will be able to obtain a
patent on the "SAFE-T-SEAT(TM)" product, or that the Company will be successful
in obtaining the exclusive right and license to use the "SAFE-T-SEAT(TM)"
product from Mr. Corbett.
LIMITED PUBLIC MARKET OR POSSIBLE VOLATILITY IN STOCK PRICES AND PENNY STOCK
RULES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT VALUE OF STOCK
There has, to date, been no substantial, consistent, public market for the
Company's Common Stock, and there can be no assurance that a substantial,
consistent, public market will develop or, if developed, that it will be
sustained. Although the Company's Common Stock has been traded on the OTC
Bulletin Board, the trading has been sporadic without significant volume.
Moreover, the over-the-counter markets for securities of small companies such as
the Company historically have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations
during certain periods. These broad market fluctuations and other factors, such
as new product developments and trends in the Company's industry and the
investment markets, and economic conditions generally, as well as quarterly
variation in the Company's results of operations, may adversely affect the
market price and trading volume of the Company's Common Stock. In addition, the
Company's Common Stock is subject to rules adopted by the Securities and
Exchange Commission regulating broker-dealer practices in connection with
transactions in the Company's Common Stock because of the added disclosure
requirements.
LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND LACK OF PROFITABILITY COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
COMPANY'S BUSINESS
The Company commenced its operations in 1992. Since that date, the
Company's operations have not been profitable. There can be no assurances that
the Company will be successful in increasing its revenues or developing
profitable operations in the future. Results of operations in the future will be
influenced by numerous factors including increases in expenses associated with
growth, market acceptance of the Company's "SAFE-T-BAR(R)" product and "SAFE-T-
SEAT(TM)" product, competition, the ability of the Company to control costs and
development of its plan of business. There can be no assurance that revenue
growth or profitability on a quarterly or annual basis can ever by obtained.
Additionally, the Company will be subject to all the risks incident to a
developing business with only a limited history of operations. Prospective
investors should consider the frequency with which relatively newly developed
and/or expanding businesses encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties,
complications and delays, as well as such other factors as the possibility of
competition with larger companies.
EFFECT OF INTEREST RATE CHANGES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S
BUSINESS
The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Such
exposure to market risk is inherent in certain of the Company's financial
instruments which arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of
business.
LOSS OF KEY PERSONNEL COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
The success of the Company is dependent upon the experience and abilities
of its senior management. Key senior management include: Francis A. Zubrowski,
Lawrence W. Holland, Adrian P. Corbett, Alejandro V. Tovar, Michael F. Hecker
and
19
<PAGE>
Clayton S. Chase all of whom are full-time and work a standard 40 hour plus
weekly work schedule. There is significant competition in the Company's industry
for qualified personnel, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to retain its existing personnel or recruit new personnel to support its
marketing objectives, goals and plans.
ITEM 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company's principal executive and administrative offices are located in
San Diego, California at 8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th floor, San Diego,
California 92108 ("Executive Offices"). The Company leases the Executive Offices
from Mission Valley Business Center LLC at a monthly rental of $5,361.00 for a
term scheduled to expire June 30, 2000. The Company considers the Executive
Offices to be adequate and suitable for its current needs.
The Company's subsidiary, Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., leases property
at 320 9th Street, Modesto, California from Berberian Farms Corporation at a
monthly rental of $12,500.00 for a term scheduled to expire April 30, 2003
("Modesto Property"). The monthly rental for the Modesto Property will increase
to $13,500.00 in December 1999, $14,500.00 in December, 2000, $15,000.00 in
December 2001, and $15,500.00 in December 2002. The Company considers the
Modesto Property to be adequate and suitable for its current needs.
ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of October 11, 1999 by (i) each
person (or group of affiliated persons who to the knowledge of the Company is
the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company's outstanding shares
of Common Stock, (ii) each director and each Named Executive Officer (as defined
in Part I Item 6 of this Form 10-SB) of the Company and (iii) all directors and
executive officers of the Company as a group. Except as otherwise noted, the
Company believes that the persons listed in this table have sole voting and
investment power respecting all shares of Common Stock owned by them.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Title of Class Name and Address of Amount and Nature of Percent of Class
Beneficial Owner Beneficial Owner
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common None - -
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Security Ownership of Management
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Title of Class Name and Address of Amount and Nature of Percent of
Beneficial Owner Beneficial Owner Class
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common Francis A. Zubrowski (1)(2) 1,193,578 4.45%
Common Shares
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Ralph D. Morren, Jr. (2) 150,000 0.55%
Common Shares
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Paul S. Hewitt (2) 0 Common Shares 0.00%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE>
(1) Does not include 250,000 shares which could be obtained upon exercise of
nonstatutory stock option for years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003.
(2) The Business address of each director and Named Executive Officer listed
above is the Company's corporate address, 8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th floor,
San Diego, California, 92108.
ITEM 5. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth certain information as of the date of this
Registration Statement with respect to the directors and executive officers of
the Company. A summary of the background and experience of each of these
individuals is set forth after the table. The executive officers serve at the
discretion of the Company's Board of Directors. All employees are full time and
work a standard 40 plus hour work schedule.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name Age Position with the Company
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Francis A. Zubrowski 64 President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adrian A. Corbett 37 Vice President of Engineering
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph D. Morren, Jr. 43 Director
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence W. Holland 32 Vice President of Sales and Marketing
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael F. Hecker 51 Vice President Manufacturing
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alejandro V. Tovar 41 Secretary, Controller
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clayton S. Chase 41 Vice President of Investor Relations
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul S. Hewitt 47 Director
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
FRANCIS A. ZUBROWSKI - Mr. Francis A. Zubrowski is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of The Majestic Companies, Ltd. Mr. Zubrowski has over 39
years of senior management experience and has served as a managing director of
The Owen Stringfellow Ltd. ("Owen Stringfellow"), a Baltimore based consulting
firm with offices in New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts. Owen Stringfellow
provides services in relation to mergers and acquisitions, debt restructuring,
public offerings and turn-around situations. Prior to joining Owen Stringfellow,
Mr. Zubrowski was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated
Industries, a New England based group in the chemical manufacturing and heavy
equipment industries. He has also worked with Bethlehem Steel, U.S. Steel and
Union Carbide operating mining and transportation companies. He represented
Kaiser-Roth Industries on the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Zubrowski holds a
Bachelors degree in Theology from Fordham University and a Masters in Business
Administration from New York University.
RALPH D. MORREN, JR. - Mr. Morren is a director of the Company and was the
Company's President from May, 1998 through December, 1998. Mr. Morren is a
Director of the Company serving since May 22, 1998 and has over 17 years of
managerial and operational experience in both domestic and international
businesses. From 1994 to 1998 Mr. Morren was the President/CEO of Morren/Laurin
Marketing, LLC, President CEO of Morren Laurin, LLC and President/Chairman of
Creation Homes, Inc. Responsibilities with these businesses have included the
day to day management of corporate affairs and operations and planning
implementation, identification, acquisition and development of company
objectives. Mr. Morren has been the Chief Executive Officer of several companies
specializing in Custom Homebuilding, Real Estate Sales and Marketing, and
Management Asset Evaluation Services. Mr. Morren has extensive expertise in
organizing and technically analyzing project management's optimal critical
paths. Mr. Morren was the President of SKYTEX International, Inc.
21
<PAGE>
ALEJANDRO V. TOVAR - Mr. Alejandro V. Tovar has served as the Company's
secretary and controller since December 23, 1998. With several years experience
as a management accountant, controller and manager with Bonaventure Minerals,
Inc., a California corporation, and Grana Baja, S.A. de C.V. a Mexican
corporation, Mr. Alejandro V, Tovar controls a wide range of business functions
involving the daily and strategic administrative activities of the Company. Mr.
Tovar was also an audit supervisor for Doubletree Hotels and a branch manager
for Norwest Financial in Southern California. Mr. Tovar has extensive tax
preparation education and experience having worked both with H&R Block and as an
independent tax preparer. He served as a captain in the United States Marine
Corps in which he specialized in artillery and logistics. Mr. Tovar is fluent
in Spanish and has maintained an in depth knowledge of Mexican business and
accounting practices. Mr. Tovar attended the University of California, San
Diego, where he received a Bachelors degree in Biology and Certificate of
Accounting. He received his Masters degree in Business Administration from
National University and was recognized with a University Leadership Award.
CLAYTON S. CHASE - Mr. Clayton S. Chase has served as Vice President of Investor
Relations of the Company since April, 1999 and has been employed by the Company
since 1998. Mr. Chase has nearly ten (10) years experience in representing and
raising capital for both public and private companies. He passed the NASD Series
7 registered representative exam in 1987. Mr. Chase headed the Arete' Design
Group, a company that designs and markets audio accessories from 1994 to 1998.
He was responsible for the identification and certification of a manufacturer in
Tecate, Mexico, which mass produced these audio accessories. Mr. Chase graduated
from the University of Colorado with a B.S. in Engineering Design and Economic
Evaluation. He has served as an account executive for several businesses
including: ROYALE SECURITIES (public) and MOA INVESTMENT CORP. (private), both
located in San Diego, CA. MOA INVESTMENT CORP. acted as the General Partner in
Limited Partnership syndications that purchased mostly all-cash real estate
properties in the hospitality industry and ROYALE SECURITIES acted as the
General Partner in Limited Partnership syndications that purchased and developed
oil and natural gas reserves.
LAWRENCE W. HOLLAND - has served as Vice President of The Majestic Companies
Ltd. since December 23, 1998. Mr. Holland has over ten (10) years in sales and
marketing as an owner of Pinnacle Trading Company, a company which conducts
commerce primarily with Mexico and Central American. He has served as a Senior
Account Executive at Physicians Capital Company, and First Nationwide Investment
Center from March, 1993 to September, 1996. His most recent project was a direct
sales program for Collegiate Sports of America. Mr. Holland received his
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with an emphasis in Finance from
San Diego State University. His graduate studies include a Professional Degree
in International Business, with an emphasis in Mexican and Latin American Trade,
from the University of California, San Diego.
ADRIAN P. CORBETT - Mr. Adrian P. Corbett has been the Company's Vice President
of Engineering from April, 1998 to the present and has served as President, Vice
President and Director of the Company's subsidiary, Majestic Transportation
Products, Ltd. He is also the inventor of the SAFE-T-BAR(R) bus seat safety
restraint product. Mr. Corbett has an extensive background in automotive and
mechanical design work. He served as Program Manager for Santa Barbara based
ASHSA Corporation in which he was responsible for concept to production of a
third world public transit bus development program. As an engineering planner
for Lockheed Space Operations at Vandenberg Air Force Base from February, 1984
to October, 1986, Mr. Corbett's responsibilities included coordinating
management, engineering, logistics and operations personnel for launch
construction schedules. He received his education in Aerospace at Northrop and
Arizona State University.
22
<PAGE>
MICHAEL HECKER - Mr. Michael Hecker has served as Vice President of
Manufacturing of the Company since December 23, 1998. He has a background in the
construction industry as well as over twenty-seven (27) years experience in
product development, production control and manufacturing. Mr. Hecker's
background in construction began with his early involvement in the family
roofing contractor business until joining the Navy where he attended the U.S.
Naval Construction School in Port Hueneme, California in 1966. Upon graduation
Mr. Hecker was assigned as a Heavy Builder to U.S. Mobile Construction Battalion
Eleven. He spent two tours, attached to the 3rd Marine Division, in Vietnam
building storage facilities, mess halls, bunkers, medical facilities and
airstrips from 1967 through 1968. After leaving the military service, Mr. Hecker
focused on remodeling homes and was Project Manager for several public utility
construction contracts in the Southern California area. Mr. Hecker joined
Industrial Automation Corporation in 1970. He served as both Engineering and
Production Manager and was responsible for the development and manufacturing of
equipment for automated packaging lines. He worked closely with such customers
as Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Lever Brothers, Labatts Breweries and was
instrumental in the design, manufacturing and installation of the first Pepsi-
Cola plant in China. When Industrial Automation Corporation was purchased by
Figgie International, Mr. Hecker became General Manager of Research &
Development for the Packaging Machinery Division.
PAUL S. HEWITT - Mr. Hewitt has served as Executive Director of the National
Taxpayers Union Foundation ("NTUF") from 1990 to present. The NTUF has been one
of Washington's most effective and widely publicized research and public
education programs, focusing on policy issues ranging from demographics and
interest group behavior to health care, budget process and Social Security
reform. From 1988 to 1989 Mr. Hewitt served as Corporate Development Consultant
for New Century Petroleum in which he assisted in raising $1.3 million in seed
capital from private investors. Mr. Hewitt has also served as a Professional
Staff Member and Staff Director on the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Inter-
Government Relations. Mr. Paul Hewitt graduated from the University of Berkeley
with a B.A. in Economics. He received a Masters of Public Administration from
American University in Washington, D.C.
ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the
compensation paid by the Company during the last three (3) fiscal years to the
Company's Chief Executive Officer ("Named Executive Officer")(1). No other
executive officer of the Company received total salary and bonus in excess of
$100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
- --------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Award Pay-outs
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Name Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Other Restricted Securities LTIP All
And Annual Stock Underlying Pay-outs Other
Principal Compensation ($) Award ($) Options ($) Compensation ($)
Position SARs (#)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
23
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Francis A. 1999 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zubrow-ski 1998 60,000 0 0 18,000 0 0 0
CEO, 1997 48,000 0 0 18,000 0 0 0
President 1996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) The information set forth relative to periods prior to the consummation of
the merger of the Majestic Companies, Ltd., a Delaware corporation, into SKYTEX
International in December, 1998, represent's sums paid to Mr. Zubrowski by The
Majestic Companies, Ltd., a Delaware corporation and prior to March, 1998 by
Majestic Motor Car Company.
FRANCIS A. ZUBROWSKI - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
On November 1st, 1998, the Company and its President and Chief Executive
Officer, Francis A. Zubrowski, renewed and amended a five year employment
agreement ("Employment Agreement") whereby the Company paid Mr. Zubrowski an
annual salary of one hundred eighty thousand dollars ($180,000.00) for 1999 and
10% increases in Mr. Zubrowski's salary per year for years 2000, 2001, 2002, and
2003. Under the Employment Agreement the Company also granted Mr. Zubrowski
nonstatutory stock options for two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) shares of
the Company's common stock for each year of Mr. Zubrowski's employment. The
exercise price for the stock option is ($0.25) twenty-five cents per share for
year 1999, thirty five cents ($0.35) per share for year 2000, fifty cents per
share ($0.50) for year 2001, seventy-five cents per share ($0.75) for year 2002,
and one dollar per share ($1.00) for year 2003. The Employment Agreement also
grants Mr. Zubrowski $1,000 a month as an automobile allowance, $500.00 per
month medical insurance allowance, and a term life insurance policy in the face
amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00).
ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company executed a Promissory Note in October, 1998, whereby the
Company agreed to pay the aggregate amount of Two Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars
($260,000.000) to Mei Wah Company, Inc., a California corporation, by December
31, 1999 ("Promissory Note"). The terms, rights, title and interest to the
Promissory Note were restructured and assigned to Francis A. Zubrowski's wife,
Gail E. Bostwick, on April 8, 1999. The Company thereby received more favorable
terms and conditions permitting payment over a period of seventy (70) months
rather than maturing on December 31, 1999.
In May, 1999 the Company obtained a $1,250,000 line of credit from a
private lender for use in its modular operations in Modesto, California. The
Company had drawn a total of $186,680 in proceeds from this facility as of
September 30, 1999, but was unable to draw further sums under the line of credit
due to the fact that the lending source ceased operations. Subsequent to these
events, the Company's CEO, Francis Zubrowski, liquidated the balance payable on
the line of credit in a private transaction with an exchange of restricted stock
he owned. The Company thereupon agreed to repay to Mr. Zubrowski the amount of
$186,680 that Mr. Zubrowski paid on the line of credit.
ITEM 8. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
COMMON STOCK
24
<PAGE>
The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.001
par value, of which, as of October 11, 1999, 26,834,070 shares were issued and
outstanding. Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per
share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders generally. The
approval of proposals submitted to stockholders at a meeting other than for the
election of directors requires the favorable vote of a majority of the shares
voting, except in the case of certain fundamental matters (such as certain
amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation, and certain mergers and
reorganizations), in which cases Nevada's law and the Company's Bylaws require
the favorable vote of at least a majority of all outstanding shares.
Stockholders are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared from time
to time by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor, and
in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company to share
ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities. The holders of
shares of Common Stock have no preemptive, conversion, subscription or
cumulative voting rights.
PART II
ITEM 1. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND
OTHER STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Company's Common Stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board
under the symbol "MJXC". The Company's Common stock is thinly traded and any bid
or sale prices reported on the OTCBB may not be a true market-based valuation of
the Common Stock. As of October 11, 1999, there were approximately 650 record
holders of the Company's Common Stock.
On December 11, 1997 the Board of Governors of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") approved a series of changes for the OTC
Bulletin Board which affect the Company. The principal changes include: (i) a
rule that only those companies that report their current financial information
to the Securities and Exchange Commission, banking or insurance regulators will
be included for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, (ii) that brokers must
review current financial statements on a company they are recommending before
they recommend a transaction in an OTC security, and (iii) that prior to the
initial purchase of an OTC security, every investor must receive a standard
disclosure statement prepared by the NASD emphasizing the differences between
the OTC securities and other market-listed securities, such as those traded on
the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. This Registration Statement is being filed on Form
10-SB with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the Company's
Common Stock under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, which, if declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission,
will require the Company to make current financial filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, thus qualifying the Company under the proposed rule
change. In the event the Company's proposed Registration Statement is not
declared effective, the Company's securities would not remain eligible for
quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, which would materially and adversely affect
the liquidity in the Company's Common Stock.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
On June 25, 1998, the Company's Common Stock began trading on the OTC
Bulletin Board under the symbol SKTX. It now trades on the OTC Bulletin Board
under the symbol MJXC. Prior to such date, there had been no market for the
Company's Common Stock; hereafter, there has been a limited trading market.
While a limited public market currently exists, there can be no assurances that
this market will be sustained or that if sustained, such market will operate in
a stable manner. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the
high and low closing prices of the Company's Common Stock as reported on the OTC
Bulletin Board. The
25
<PAGE>
following quotations are over-the-market quotations and, accordingly, reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not
represent actual transactions.
COMMON STOCK
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
QUARTER TRADE TRADE TRADE
High Low High Low High Low
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1st Quarter 1.62 .38 - - - -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2nd Quarter 1.03 .34 - - - -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd Quarter .56 .18 5.50 4.05 - -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4th Quarter 4.05 1.00 - -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
NO DIVIDENDS ANTICIPATED TO BE PAID
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock since its
inception and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. The future payment of dividends is directly dependent upon future
earnings of the Company, its financial requirements and other factors to be
determined by the Company's Board of Directors, in its sole discretion. For the
foreseeable future, it is anticipated that any earnings which may be generated
from the Company's operations will be used to finance the growth of the Company,
and that cash dividends will not be paid to Common Stockholders.
ITEM 2. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
CITIBANK, FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, a federal savings bank, by and through its
service agent, CITIBANK, N.A., a national banking association v. MAJESTIC
MODULAR BUILDINGS, LTD., CAL-AMERICAN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. et al. (Case No.
182714 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
Stanislaws). On October 19, 1998, Plaintiff commenced an action by filing a
Complaint alleging that Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., leased raw materials
from Cal-American Building Company, Inc. that was subject to a security interest
owned by Plaintiff. The Complaint also alleges that Majestic Modular Buildings,
Ltd.'s entering into a License Agreement and Real Property Lease with Cal-
American Building Company, Inc., constituted fraudulent transfers or conveyances
by Cal-American Building Company, Inc. to Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.
Plaintiff seeks damages against Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., and the other
defendants in the amount of $299,822 and seeks to set aside the transfers of any
asset that occurred under the Equipment Lease Agreement, the License Agreement
and the Real Estate Property Lease between Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd. and
Cal-American Building Company, Inc. The Company has answered Plaintiff's
complaint and believes it has properly responded to Plaintiff's Discovery
Demands to date. No trial date has yet been set. The Company believes it bears
no liability to Plaintiff, intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit and is
prepared to take the case to trial if Plaintiff does not agree to a reasonable
nuisance value settlement amount.
The business relation between Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., and, Cal-
American Building Company, Inc., was a contractor/subcontractor relationship.
Majestic entered into an agreement with Cal-American to perform subcontract work
on an order belonging to Cal-American. Additionally, Majestic Modular Buildings
made a one-time purchase of raw materials from Cal-American's inventory.
Majestic Modular
26
<PAGE>
paid fair market value for these materials valued at approximately $68,000.
These building materials consisted of items such as steel, electric wiring,
insulation, etc. A licensing agreement mentioned in the complaint by Citibank
consisted of an agreement between Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd., and, Cal-
American Building Company, Inc., in which Majestic was allowed the use of
building specific plans called "P.C.'s" belonging to Cal-American for
construction of the buildings called for in the subcontract.
ITEM 3. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
The Company has not had any changes in or disagreements with its
accountants.
ITEM 4. RECENT SALES IN UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
In it's placements exempt from Securities Act registrations under Section
4(2), the Company (or its predecessors) relied upon representations from the
purchasers that they were acquiring the shares for investment without any
present intention to redistribute the shares, that the investors had sufficient
experience and knowledge to protect their interests, either alone or with a
representative, and that such purchasers had received all information requested
by them, and acknowledgements from the investors that the shares were
unregistered, "restricted" securities subject to Rule 144 under the Securities
Act, with all certificates for such shares containing a legend to this effect
restricting transfer.
In its placement exempt from Securities Act registration under Section 3(b)
the Company relied upon representations from the purchasers that the purchasers
had sufficient knowledge and experience to protect their interests either alone
or with a representative and had received all information they had requested
from the Company.
During the last three (3) years the Company, or certain of its
predecessors, has sold unregistered securities in the following
transactions:
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD., a Nevada corporation
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD.,(SECTION 4(2) PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - COMMON
STOCK - On December 8, 1998, The Majestic Companies, Ltd., a NEVADA corporation,
issued an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of common stock in a transaction exempt
under 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, at a basis cost of $.001
per share (par value at that time) to the 35 individuals who were security
holders prior to the merger of the Delaware corporation, the Majestic Companies,
Ltd., into SKYTEX International and the related change of the name of SKYTEX to
the Majestic Companies, Ltd.
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD. (SECTION 4(2) PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - COMMON
STOCK - Between March 18, 1999 and June 29, 1999 THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD.,
sold 725,000 common shares at a basis cost of between $0.40 and $0.50 to two (2)
sophisticated investors, none of whom was an affiliate, pursuant to a private
placement exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
for an aggregate consideration of $350,000.
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD. - 504 REGULATION D OFFERING - Between March
10, 1999 and August 30, 1999, THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD., sold 2,115,498
shares of common stock to a total of 64 United States individuals, none of whom
was an affiliate, at a basis cost between $0.40 and $0.85 cents in a Rule
27
<PAGE>
504 regulation D offering for an aggregate consideration of $978,275 exempt
under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD., a Delaware corporation
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD. - PREFERRED CONVERTIBLE STOCK (SECTION 4(2)
PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - Between July 3, 1998 and December 9, 1998. The pre-merger
Delaware corporation, THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD., ("Delaware Company") sold
127 units of preferred convertible offering comprised of a class of preferred
shares with detachable warrants to a total of 48 sophisticated investors, none
of whom was an affiliate, pursuant to a private placement exempt under Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, at a price of $6,000 per unit
raising a total of $762,000. Each unit was broken down to 5,000 preferred shares
at a basis cost of $1.00 per share and 10,000 warrants (price at $0.10 each) to
purchase the common stock in the future at a strike price of $1.50, $1.75 or
$2.00 (depending on the exercise date). All unit holders elected to convert
their preferred shares to common shares immediately upon acceptance of the
investment by the Delaware Company. Each unit of 5,000 preferred shares
converted to 7,500 shares of common resulting in a total of 952,000 shares of
common stock issued for a total amount raised of $635,000 (approx. $0.67 per
share basis) and the issuance of 1,270,000 (at $0.10 cents each) warrants
raising an additional $127,000.
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD.
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD. (SECTION 4(2)PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - SPECIAL
WARRANTS SALE - $0.10 CENT WARRANTS Between April 16, 1997 and June 15, 1998,
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD., sold 1,000,000 special warrants (each warrant
good for the purchase of one share of common stock, no strike price) at a basis
cost of $0.10 to 18 sophisticated investors, none of whom was an affiliate,
pursuant to a private placement exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. A total of $100,000 was raised.
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD. (SECTION 4(2) PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - SPECIAL
WARRANTS SALE - $0.25 CENT WARRANTS - Between September 16, 1997 and April 7,
1998, MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD. sold 1,013,322 special warrants (each
warrant good for the purchase of one share of common stock, no strike price) at
a basis cost of $0.25 to 51 sophisticated investors, none of whom was an
affiliate, pursuant to a private placement exempt under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. A total of $253,333 was raised.
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD. (SECTION 4(2) PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - SPECIAL
WARRANTS SALE - $0.35 CENT WARRANTS - Between January 2, 1998 and June 2, 1998,
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD., sold 1,200,000 special warrants (each warrant
good for the purchase of one share of common stock, no strike price) at a basis
cost of $0.35 to 32 sophisticated investors, none of whom was an affiliate,
pursuant to a private placement exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. A total of $420,000 was raised.
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD. (SECTION 4(2) PRIVATE PLACEMENT) - SPECIAL
WARRANTS SALE - $0.50 CENT WARRANTS - Between May 1, 1998 and June 29, 1998,
MAJESTIC MOTOR CAR COMPANY, LTD. sold 400,000 special warrants (each warrant
good for the purchase of one share of common stock, no strike price) at a basis
cost of $0.50 to 18 sophisticated investors, none of whom was an affiliate,
pursuant to a private placement exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. A total of $200,000 was raised.
28
<PAGE>
MAJESTIC MINERALS, LTD.
MAJESTIC MINERALS, LTD. (SECTION 4(2) PRIVATE PLACEMENT) COMMON STOCK -
On September 11, 1995, MAJESTIC MINERALS, LTD. sold 150,328 shares of common
stock at a basis cost of $0.06 cents to five (5) sophisticated investors, none
of whom was an affiliate, pursuant to a private placement exempt under Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. A total of $28,000 (US) was
raised.
ITEM 5. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides that the directors of
the Company shall be protected from personal liability to the fullest extent
permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company's Bylaws also contain
a provision for the indemnification of the Company's directors (see
"Indemnification of Directors and Officers - Bylaws" in Exhibit 3.4).
PART III
ITEMS 1 AND 2 INDEX TO AND DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
2.1- Articles of Incorporation of The Majestic Companies, Ltd., as amended.
2.2- By-Laws of The Majestic Companies, Ltd., as amended.
3.1- Specimen of Common Stock Certificate.
6.1- Office Lease dated December 31, 1997, between Mission Valley Business
Center LLC and The Majestic Companies, Ltd.
6.2- Real Property Lease dated May 1, 1998, between Berberian Farms
Corporation and Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.
6.3- Equipment Lease dated August 10, 1999, between Saddleback Financial
Corporation and Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.
6.4- Lease/Purchase Agreement dated August 31, 1999, between A-Z BusSales,
Inc., and The Majestic Companies, Ltd.
29
<PAGE>
6.5- Employment Agreement dated November 1, 1998, between Francis A.
Zubrowski and The Majestic Companies, Ltd.
6.6- Assignment by Mei Wah Company, Inc. Note of $260,000 to Gail E.
Bostwick dated April 8, 1999.
6.7- Security Agreement dated May 21, 1999, between Gail E. Bostwick and The
Majestic Companies, Ltd.
6.8- License Agreement dated April 22, 1998, between Cal-American Building
Company, Inc., Steven D. Rosenthal and Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.
6.9- Promissory Note dated August 27, 1999, payable to Margaret C. Hubard by
The Majestic Companies, Ltd. and Majestic Transportation Products, Ltd.
in the Aggregate Amount of $100,000.00.
6.11- Agreement for a Funding Source dated May 21, 1999, between Rick Griffey
and Majestic Modular Buildings, Ltd.
6.12- Patent License Agreement dated February 20, 1998, between Adrian P.
Corbett and Majestic Motor Car Company, Ltd.
6.13- Promissory Note payable in the aggregate amount of $260,000.00 from
Skytex International, Inc. to Mei Wah Company, Inc.
6.14- Consulting Agreement dated May 28, 1999, between The Majestic
Companies, Ltd., a Delaware corporation and Venture Consultants, LLC,
terminating May 28, 2000.
6.15- Investment Banking Services Agreement date September 29, 1999 between
NC Capital Markets, Inc. and The Majestic Companies, Ltd.
6.16- Warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of The Majestic Companies, Ltd.,
owned by Margaret C. Hubard expiring August 27, 2001 and executed on
August 27, 1999.
6.17- Security Agreement dated August 26, 1999 between The Majestic
Companies, Ltd. and Majestic Transportation Products, Ltd. and Margaret
C. Hubard.
6.18- Disbursement Agreement dated August 26, 1999 between The Majestic
Companies, Ltd., Majestic Transportation Products, Ltd. and Margaret C.
Hubard in the aggregate amount of $100,000.00.
6.19- Promissory Note between Francis A. Zubrowski and The Majestic
Companies, dated October 20, 1999.
8.1- Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 8, 1998, between Skytex
International, Inc., and The Majestic Companies, Ltd.
8.2- First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 10,
1998.
8.3- State of Delaware Certificate of Merger of Domestic Corporation and
Foreign Corporation dated December 16, 1998.
8.4- Articles of Merger of Domestic and Foreign Corporations into Skytex
International, Inc., dated November 3, 1998.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
30
<PAGE>
In accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE MAJESTIC COMPANIES, LTD.
By:/s/Francis A. Zubrowski February 4, 2000
----------------------------------------- ----------------
Francis A. Zubrowski, Chairman and C.E.O. DATE
31
