<PAGE> 1
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 11, 1999
SECURITIES ACT FILE NO. 333-77531
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NO. 811-09313
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM N-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 [X]
PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 [X]
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. [ ]
AND/OR
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 [X]
AMENDMENT NO. 2 [X]
(Check appropriate box or boxes)
------------------------
MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA INSURED FUND V, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified
in Charter)
------------------------
800 SCUDDERS MILL ROAD, PLAINSBORO, NEW JERSEY 08536
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (609) 282-2800
TERRY K. GLENN
MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA INSURED FUND V, INC.
800 SCUDDERS MILL ROAD
PLAINSBORO, NEW JERSEY 08536
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 9011, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 08543-9011
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
------------------------
COPIES TO:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MICHAEL J. HENNEWINKEL, ESQ. FRANK P. BRUNO, ESQ.
FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. BROWN & WOOD LLP
P.O. BOX 9011 ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER
PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 08543-9011 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10048-0557
</TABLE>
------------------------
Approximate date of proposed public offering: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
------------------------
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), other than securities offered only in
connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following
box. [ ]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. [ ]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434
under the Securities Act, please check the following box. [ ]
------------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PROPOSED
PROPOSED MAXIMUM
AMOUNT MAXIMUM AGGREGATE
TITLE OF BEING OFFERING PRICE OFFERING
SECURITIES BEING REGISTERED REGISTERED(1)(2) PER UNIT(1) PRICE(1)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock ($.10 par value)............................... 5,750,000 shares $15.00 $86,250,000
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
AMOUNT OF
TITLE OF REGISTRATION
SECURITIES BEING REGISTERED FEE(3)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock ($.10 par value)............................... $23,978
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee.
(2) Includes $750,000 shares subject to the underwriter's over-allotment option.
(3) Transmitted to the designated lockbox at Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh, PA.
$23,978 was previously paid.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED.
WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER
TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED JUNE 11, 1999
PROSPECTUS
5,000,000 SHARES
MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA INSURED FUND V, INC.
COMMON STOCK
------------------------
MuniHoldings California Insured Fund V, Inc. (the "Fund") is a newly
organized, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that seeks
to provide shareholders with current income exempt from Federal and California
income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing primarily in
a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal obligations the interest on
which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from Federal and
California income taxes. The Fund intends to invest in municipal obligations
that are rated investment grade or, if unrated, are considered by the Fund's
investment adviser to be of comparable quality. Under normal circumstances, at
least 80% of the Fund's assets will be invested in municipal obligations with
remaining maturities of one year or more that are covered by insurance
guaranteeing the timely payment of principal at maturity and interest.
Because the Fund is newly organized, its shares have no history of public
trading. Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a
discount from their net asset value. This risk may be greater for investors
expecting to sell their shares in a relatively short period after completion of
the public offering. The Fund plans to apply to list its shares on the New York
Stock Exchange or another national securities exchange under the symbol "CAS."
Trading of the Fund's common stock on the exchange is expected to begin within
two weeks of the date of this prospectus. Before it begins trading, the
underwriter does not intend to make a market in the Fund's shares. Thus,
investors may not be able to buy and sell shares of the Fund during that time.
Within approximately three months after completion of this offering of
common stock, the Fund intends to offer shares of preferred stock representing
approximately 40% of the Fund's capital immediately after the issuance of such
preferred stock. There can be no assurance, however, that preferred stock
representing such percentage of the Fund's capital will actually be issued. The
use of preferred stock to leverage the common stock can create special risks.
------------------------
This prospectus contains information you should know before investing,
including information about risks. Please read it before you invest and keep it
for future reference.
------------------------
INVESTING IN THE COMMON STOCK INVOLVES CERTAIN RISKS, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED
IN THE "RISK FACTORS AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS" SECTION BEGINNING ON PAGE 8 OF
THIS PROSPECTUS.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER SHARE TOTAL
--------- -----
<S> <C> <C>
Public Offering Price.............. $15.00 $75,000,000
Sales Load......................... None None
Proceeds, before expenses, to
Fund............................. $15.00 $75,000,000
</TABLE>
The Fund's investment adviser or an affiliate will pay the underwriter a
commission in the amount of % of the public offering price per share in
connection with the sale of the common stock.
The underwriter may also purchase up to an additional 750,000 shares at the
public offering price within 45 days from the date of this prospectus to cover
over-allotments.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
We expect that the shares of common stock will be ready for delivery in New
York, New York on or about June , 1999.
------------------------
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
------------------------
The date of this prospectus is June , 1999.
<PAGE> 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Prospectus Summary.......................................... 3
Risk Factors and Special Considerations..................... 8
Fee Table................................................... 10
The Fund.................................................... 11
Use of Proceeds............................................. 11
Investment Objective and Policies........................... 11
Risks and Special Considerations of Leverage................ 22
Investment Restrictions..................................... 25
Directors and Officers...................................... 27
Investment Advisory and Management Arrangements............. 29
Portfolio Transactions...................................... 31
Dividends and Distributions................................. 32
Taxes....................................................... 33
Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan........................ 37
Mutual Fund Investment Option............................... 39
Net Asset Value............................................. 40
Description of Capital Stock................................ 40
Custodian................................................... 44
Underwriting................................................ 44
Transfer Agent, Dividend Disbursing Agent and Registrar..... 45
Legal Opinions.............................................. 45
Experts..................................................... 45
Additional Information...................................... 45
Independent Auditors' Report................................ 48
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Capital................ 49
Appendix I -- Economic and Other Conditions in California... 50
Appendix II -- Ratings of Municipal Bonds................... 64
Appendix III -- Portfolio Insurance......................... 71
Appendix IV -- Taxable Equivalent Yields for 1999........... 73
</TABLE>
------------------------
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUND CAN BE REVIEWED AND COPIED AT THE SEC'S PUBLIC
REFERENCE ROOM IN WASHINGTON, D.C. CALL 1-800-SEC-0330 FOR INFORMATION ON THE
OPERATION OF THE PUBLIC REFERENCE ROOM. THIS INFORMATION IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON
THE SEC'S INTERNET SITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV AND COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED UPON
PAYMENT OF A DUPLICATING FEE BY WRITING THE PUBLIC REFERENCE SECTION OF THE SEC,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-6009.
------------------------
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We
have not, and the underwriter has not, authorized any other person to provide
you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or
inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the
underwriter is not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction
where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information
appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of
this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects may have changed since that date.
2
<PAGE> 4
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the detailed
information included in this prospectus.
THE FUND MuniHoldings California Insured Fund V, Inc. is a newly
organized, non-diversified, closed-end management investment
company.
THE OFFERING The Fund is offering 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an
initial offering price of $15.00 per share. The common stock is
being offered by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, as underwriter. The underwriter may also purchase
up to an additional 750,000 shares of common stock within 45 days
of the date of this prospectus to cover over-allotments.
INVESTMENT
OBJECTIVE
AND POLICIES The investment objective of the Fund is to provide shareholders
with current income exempt from Federal and California income
taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing
primarily in a portfolio of long-term, investment grade municipal
obligations the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel
to the issuer, is exempt from Federal and California income
taxes.
Investment Grade Municipal Bonds. The Fund intends to invest in
municipal bonds that are rated investment grade by one or more
nationally recognized statistical rating agencies or, if unrated,
are considered by the Fund's investment adviser to be of
comparable quality.
California Municipal Bonds. The Fund will generally invest
substantially all (at least 80%) of its assets in California
municipal bonds. However, when the Fund's investment adviser
believes that investment grade California municipal bonds are not
available in sufficient amounts at an appropriate price, the Fund
may invest a lesser amount of its assets in these securities. At
all times, except during periods when the Fund is in the process
of investing its proceeds from a public offering or during
temporary defensive periods, the Fund intends to invest at least
65% of its assets in California municipal bonds and at least 80%
of its assets in California municipal bonds and other long-term
municipal bonds. These other long-term municipal bonds that the
Fund may buy will be exempt from Federal income tax but not
California income tax.
The Fund will normally invest at least 80% of its assets in
insured municipal obligations with remaining maturities of one
year or more. Insured municipal obligations are covered by
insurance that guarantees timely interest payments and the
repayment of principal at maturity.
In general, the Fund does not intend its investments to earn a
large amount of income that is not exempt from Federal and
California income taxes.
Indexed and Inverse Floating Rate Securities. The Fund may
invest in securities whose potential returns are directly related
to changes in an underlying index or interest rate, known as
indexed securities. The return on indexed securities will rise
when the underlying index or interest rate rises and fall when
the index or interest rate falls. The Fund may also invest in
securities whose return is inversely related to changes in an
interest rate (inverse floaters). In general, income on inverse
floaters will decrease
3
<PAGE> 5
when short term interest rates increase and increase when short
term interest rates decrease. Investments in inverse floaters may
subject the Fund to the risks of reduced or eliminated interest
payments and losses of principal. In addition, certain indexed
securities and inverse floaters may increase or decrease in value
at a greater rate than the underlying interest rate, which
effectively leverages the Fund's investment. As a result, the
market value of such securities will generally be more volatile
than that of fixed rate, tax exempt securities. Both indexed
securities and inverse floaters are derivative securities and can
be considered speculative.
Options and Futures Transactions. The Fund may seek to hedge its
portfolio against changes in interest rates using options and
financial futures contracts. The Fund's hedging transactions are
designed to reduce volatility, but come at some cost. For
example, the Fund may try to limit its risk of loss from a
decline in price of a portfolio security by purchasing a put
option. However, the Fund must pay for the option, and the price
of the security may not in fact drop. In large part, the success
of the Fund's hedging activities depends on its ability to
forecast movements in securities prices and interest rates. The
Fund does not, however, intend to enter into options and futures
transactions for speculative purposes. The Fund is not required
to hedge its portfolio and may choose not to do so. The Fund
cannot guarantee that any hedging strategies it uses will work.
LEVERAGE Issuance of Preferred Stock. The Fund intends to offer shares of
preferred stock within three months after completion of this
offering. The preferred stock will represent approximately 40% of
the Fund's capital, including the capital raised by issuing the
preferred stock. There can be no assurance, however, that
preferred stock will actually be issued. Issuing preferred stock
will result in the leveraging of the common stock. Although the
Board of Directors has not yet determined the terms of the
preferred stock offering, the Fund expects that the preferred
stock will pay dividends that will be adjusted over either
relatively short-term periods (generally seven to 28 days) or
medium-term periods (up to five years). The preferred stock
dividend rate will be based upon prevailing interest rates for
debt obligations of comparable maturity. The money raised by the
preferred stock offering will be invested in longer-term
obligations in accordance with the Fund's investment objective.
The expenses of the preferred stock, which will be borne by the
Fund, will reduce the net asset value of the common stock. In
addition, at times, when the Fund is required to allocate taxable
income to preferred stockholders, the terms of the preferred
stock may require the Fund to make an additional distribution to
them. The amount of this additional distribution approximately
equals the tax liability resulting from the allocation (an
"Additional Distribution"). During periods when the Fund has
preferred stock outstanding, the Fund will pay fees to the
investment adviser for its services that are higher than if the
Fund did not issue preferred stock because the fees will be
calculated on the basis of the Fund's average weekly net assets,
including proceeds from the sale of preferred stock.
Potential Benefits of Leverage. Under normal market conditions,
longer term obligations produce higher yields than short and
medium term obligations. The Fund's
4
<PAGE> 6
investment adviser believes that the interest income the Fund
receives from its long term investments will exceed the amount of
interest the Fund must pay to the preferred stockholders. Thus,
the Fund's use of preferred stock should provide common
stockholders with a higher yield than they would receive if the
Fund were not leveraged.
Risks. The use of leverage creates certain risks for common
stockholders, including higher volatility of both the net asset
value and the market value of the common stock. Since any decline
in the value of the Fund's investments will affect only the
common stockholders, in a declining market the use of leverage
will cause the Fund's net asset value to decrease more than it
would if the Fund were not leveraged. This decrease in net asset
value will likely also cause a decline in the market price for
shares of common stock. In addition, fluctuations in the dividend
rates paid on, and the amount of taxable income allocable to, the
preferred stock will affect the yield to common stockholders.
There can be no assurance that the Fund will earn a higher net
return on its investments than the then current dividend rate
(and any Additional Distribution) it pays on the preferred stock.
Under certain conditions, the benefits of leverage to common
stockholders will be reduced, and the Fund's leveraged capital
structure could result in a lower rate of return to common
stockholders than if the Fund were not leveraged.
Distributions. When the Fund issues preferred stock, common
stockholders will receive all of the Fund's net income that
remains after it pays dividends (and any Additional Distribution)
on the preferred stock and generally will be entitled to a pro
rata share of net realized capital gains. If the Fund is
liquidated, preferred stockholders will be entitled to receive
liquidating distributions before any distribution is made to
common stockholders. These liquidating distributions are expected
to equal the original purchase price per share of the preferred
stock plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends and Additional
Distributions.
Redemption of Preferred Stock. The Fund may redeem the preferred
stock for any reason. For example, the Fund may redeem all or
part of the preferred stock if it believes that the Fund's
leveraged capital structure will cause common stockholders to
obtain a lower return than they would if the common stock were
unleveraged for any significant amount of time.
Voting Rights. Preferred stockholders, voting as a separate
class, will be entitled to elect two of the Fund's Directors.
Common and preferred stockholders, voting together as a single
class, will be entitled to elect the remaining Directors. If the
Fund fails to pay dividends to the preferred stockholders for two
full years, the holders of all outstanding shares of preferred
stock, voting as a separate class, would then be entitled to
elect a majority of the Fund's Directors. The preferred
stockholders also will vote separately on certain other matters
as required under the Fund's Articles of Incorporation, the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and Maryland law.
Otherwise, common and preferred stockholders will have equal
voting rights (one vote per share) and will vote together as a
single class.
5
<PAGE> 7
Ratings. Before it offers the preferred stock, the Fund intends
to apply to one or more nationally recognized statistical ratings
organizations for ratings on the preferred stock. The Fund
believes that a rating for the preferred stock will make it
easier to market the stock, which should reduce the dividend
rate.
LISTING Currently, there is no public market for the Fund's common stock.
However, the Fund plans to apply to list its shares of common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange or another national
securities exchange. Trading of the Fund's common stock is
expected to begin within two weeks of the date of this
prospectus. Before it begins trading, the underwriter does not
intend to make a market in the Fund's shares of common stock.
Thus, investors may not be able to buy and sell shares of the
Fund during that period.
INVESTMENT
ADVISER Fund Asset Management, L.P. is the Fund's investment adviser and
provides investment advisory and management services to the Fund.
For its services, the Fund pays the investment adviser a fee at
the annual rate of 0.55% of the Fund's average weekly net assets,
including assets acquired from the sale of preferred stock.
DIVIDENDS
AND
DISTRIBUTIONS The Fund intends to distribute dividends of all or a portion of
its net investment income to common stockholders each month. Once
the Fund issues preferred stock, the monthly dividends to common
stockholders will consist of all or a portion of net investment
income that remains after the Fund pays dividends (and any
Additional Distribution) on the preferred stock. At times, in
order to maintain a stable level of monthly dividends to common
stockholders, the Fund may pay out less than all of its net
investment income or pay out accumulated undistributed income in
addition to net investment income. The Fund expects to begin
paying dividends to common stockholders within approximately 90
days from the date of this prospectus. The Fund will distribute
net capital gains, if any, at least annually to common
stockholders and, after it issues the preferred stock, on a pro
rata basis to common and preferred stockholders. When the Fund
allocates capital gains or other taxable income to preferred
stockholders, under certain circumstances, the terms of the
preferred stock may require the Fund to make an Additional
Distribution. The Fund may not declare any cash dividend or other
distribution on its common stock unless the preferred stock has
asset coverage of at least 200%. If the Fund issues preferred
stock representing 40% of its total capital, the preferred
stock's asset coverage will be approximately 250%. If the Fund's
ability to make distributions on its common stock is limited, the
Fund may not be able to qualify for taxation as a regulated
investment company. This would have adverse tax consequences for
common stockholders.
YIELD
CONSIDERATIONS The yield on the Fund's common stock will vary from period to
period depending on factors including, but not limited to, market
conditions, the timing of the Fund's investment in portfolio
securities, the securities comprising the Fund's portfolio,
changes in tax-exempt interest rates (which may not change to the
same extent or in the same direction as taxable rates) including
changes in the relationship between short-term rates and
long-term rates, the amount and timing of the issuance of the
Fund's preferred stock, the effects of preferred stock leverage
on the common stock discussed above under "Leverage", the timing
of the investment of preferred stock
6
<PAGE> 8
\proceeds in portfolio securities, the Fund's net assets and its
operating expenses. Consequently, the Fund cannot guarantee any
particular yield on its shares and the yield for any given period
is not an indication or representation of future yields on Fund
shares. The Fund's ability to achieve any particular yield level
after it commences operations depends on future interest rates
and other factors mentioned above and the initial yield and later
yields may be lower. Any statements as to the estimated yield are
as of the date made and no guarantee can be given that the Fund
will achieve or maintain any particular yield level.
AUTOMATIC
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT
PLAN Dividend and capital gains distributions generally are used to
purchase additional shares of the Fund's common stock. However,
an investor can choose to receive distributions in cash. Since
not all investors can participate in the automatic dividend
reinvestment plan, you should call your broker or nominee to
confirm that you are eligible to participate in the plan.
MUTUAL FUND
INVESTMENT
OPTION Investors who purchase shares in this offering through the
underwriter and later sell their shares have the option, subject
to certain conditions, to purchase Class D shares of certain
Merrill Lynch funds with the proceeds from the sale.
7
<PAGE> 9
RISK FACTORS AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Liquidity and Market Price of Shares. The Fund is newly organized and has
no operating history or history of public trading. Before the Fund's common
stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, an investment in the Fund may be
illiquid.
Shares of closed-end funds that trade in a secondary market frequently
trade at a market price that is below their net asset value. This is commonly
referred to as "trading at a discount." Investors who sell their shares within a
relatively short period after completion of the public offering are more likely
to be exposed to this risk. The Fund is designed primarily for long-term
investors and should not be considered a vehicle for trading purposes.
California Municipal Bonds. The Fund intends to invest the majority of its
portfolio in California municipal bonds. As a result, the Fund is more exposed
to risks affecting issuers of California municipal bonds than is a municipal
bond fund that invests more widely.
Interest Rate and Credit Risk. The Fund invests in municipal bonds, which
are subject to interest rate and credit risk. Interest rate risk is the risk
that prices of municipal bonds generally increase when interest rates decline
and decrease when interest rates increase. Prices of longer term securities
generally change more in response to interest rate changes than prices of
shorter term securities. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer will be unable
to pay the interest or principal when due. The degree of credit risk depends on
both the financial condition of the issuer and the terms of the obligation.
Non-diversification. The Fund is registered as a "non-diversified"
investment company. This means that the Fund may invest a greater percentage of
its assets in a single issuer than a diversified investment company. Even as a
non-diversified fund, the Fund must still meet the diversification requirements
of applicable Federal income tax laws. Since the Fund may invest a relatively
high percentage of its assets in a limited number of issuers, the Fund may be
more exposed to any single economic, political or regulatory occurrence than a
more widely-diversified fund.
Rating Categories. The Fund intends to invest in municipal bonds that are
rated investment grade by Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or
Fitch IBCA, Inc. It may also invest in unrated municipal bonds that the Fund's
investment adviser believes are of comparable quality. Obligations rated in the
lowest investment grade category may have certain speculative characteristics.
Private Activity Bonds. The Fund may invest in certain tax-exempt
securities classified as "private activity bonds." These bonds may subject
certain investors in the Fund to the Federal alternative minimum tax.
Portfolio Insurance and Rating Agencies. The Fund will be subject to
certain investment restrictions imposed by guidelines of the insurance companies
that issue portfolio insurance and to guidelines of one or more nationally
recognized statistical ratings organizations that may issue ratings for the
preferred stock. These guidelines may impose asset coverage or portfolio
composition requirements that are more stringent than those imposed by the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Fund does not expect these
requirements or guidelines to prevent the investment adviser from managing the
Fund's portfolio in accordance with the Fund's investment objective and
policies.
8
<PAGE> 10
Leverage. The Fund plans to offer shares of preferred stock. The preferred
stock will represent approximately 40% of the Fund's capital, including capital
raised by issuing the preferred stock. Leverage creates certain risks for common
stockholders, including higher volatility of both the net asset value and the
market value of the common stock. Leverage also creates the risk that the
investment return on shares of the Fund's common stock will be reduced to the
extent the dividends paid on preferred stock and other expenses of the preferred
stock exceed the income earned by the Fund on its investments. If the Fund is
liquidated, preferred stockholders will be entitled to receive liquidating
distributions before any distribution is made to common stockholders.
Inverse Floating Obligations. The Fund's investments in "inverse floating
obligations" or "residual interest bonds" provide investment leverage because
their market value increases or decreases in response to market changes at a
greater rate than fixed rate, long term tax exempt securities. The market values
of such securities are more volatile than the market values of fixed rate, tax
exempt securities.
Options and Futures Transactions. The Fund may engage in certain options
and futures transactions to reduce its exposure to interest rate movements. If
the Fund incorrectly forecasts market values, interest rates or other factors,
the Fund's performance could suffer. The Fund also may suffer a loss if the
other party to the transaction fails to meet its obligations. The Fund is not
required to use hedging and may not do so.
Antitakeover Provisions. The Fund's Articles of Incorporation include
provisions that could limit the ability of other entities or persons to acquire
control of the Fund or to change the composition of its Board of Directors. Such
provisions could limit the ability of shareholders to sell their shares at a
premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from seeking
to obtain control of the Fund.
9
<PAGE> 11
FEE TABLE
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
SHAREHOLDER TRANSACTION EXPENSES:
Maximum Sales Load (as a percentage of offering
price)................................................ None
Dividend Reinvestment Plan Fees........................ None
ANNUAL EXPENSES (as a percentage of net assets attributable
to Common Stock):
Investment Advisory Fees(a)(b)......................... .92%
Interest Payments on Borrowed Funds.................... None
Other Expenses(a)(b)................................... .42%
----
Total Annual Expenses(a)(b)....................... 1.34%
====
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1 YEAR 3 YEARS 5 YEARS 10 YEARS
EXAMPLE ------ ------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
An investor would pay the following expenses on a
$1,000 investment, assuming total annual expenses of
1.34% (assuming leverage of 40% of the Fund's total
assets) and a 5% annual return throughout the
periods:............................................ $14 $42 $73 $161
</TABLE>
- ------------
(a) Assumes leverage by issuing preferred stock in an amount of approximately
40% of the Fund's capital at a dividend rate of 3.25%. The Fund intends to
use leverage only if the Investment Adviser believes that it would result in
higher income to shareholders over time. See "Risks and Special
Considerations of Leverage." If the Fund does not use leverage, it is
estimated that, as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock,
the Investment Advisory Fees would be 0.55%, Other Expenses would be 0.19%
and Total Annual Expenses would be 0.74%.
(b) See "Investment Advisory and Management Arrangements" -- page 28.
The Fee Table is intended to assist investors in understanding the costs
and expenses that a shareholder in the Fund will bear directly or indirectly.
The expenses set forth under "Other Expenses" are based on estimated amounts
through the end of the Fund's first fiscal year. The Example set forth above
assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions and uses a 5% annual
rate of return as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
regulations. THE EXAMPLE SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A REPRESENTATION OF FUTURE
EXPENSES OR ANNUAL RATES OF RETURN, AND ACTUAL EXPENSES OR ANNUAL RATES OF
RETURN MAY BE MORE OR LESS THAN THOSE ASSUMED FOR PURPOSES OF THE EXAMPLE.
10
<PAGE> 12
THE FUND
MuniHoldings California Insured Fund V, Inc. (the "Fund") is a newly
organized, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund
was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April 5, 1999, and
has registered under the 1940 Act. The Fund's principal office is located at 800
Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536, and its telephone number is
(609) 282-2800.
The Fund has been organized as a closed-end investment company. Closed-end
investment companies differ from open-end investment companies (commonly
referred to as "mutual funds") in that closed-end investment companies do not
generally make a continuous offering of their shares or redeem their securities
at the option of the shareholder, whereas open-end companies issue securities
redeemable at net asset value at any time at the option of the shareholder and
typically engage in a continuous offering of their shares. Accordingly, open-end
investment companies are subject to continuous asset in-flows and out-flows that
can complicate portfolio management. Shares of closed-end investment companies,
however, frequently trade at a discount from their net asset value. This risk
may be greater for investors expecting to sell their shares in a relatively
short period after completion of the public offering.
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds of this offering will be approximately $ (or
approximately $ assuming the Underwriter exercises the over-allotment
option in full) after payment of offering expenses estimated to be approximately
$ .
The net proceeds of the offering will be invested in accordance with the
Fund's investment objective and policies within approximately three months after
completion of the offering of common stock, depending on market conditions and
the availability of appropriate securities. Pending such investment, it is
anticipated that the proceeds will be invested in short-term, tax-exempt
securities. See "Investment Objective and Policies."
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE AND POLICIES
The Fund's investment objective is to provide shareholders with current
income exempt from Federal and California income taxes. The Fund will seek to
achieve its objective by investing primarily in a portfolio of long-term,
investment grade municipal obligations issued by or on behalf of the State of
California, its political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, and
other qualifying issuers, each of which pays interest which, in the opinion of
bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from Federal and California income taxes
("California Municipal Bonds"). The Fund intends to invest substantially all (at
least 80%) of its assets in California Municipal Bonds, except at times when the
Fund's investment adviser, Fund Asset Management, L.P. (the "Investment
Adviser"), considers that California Municipal Bonds of sufficient quality and
quantity are unavailable for investment at suitable prices by the Fund. To the
extent the Investment Adviser considers that suitable California Municipal Bonds
are not available for investment, the Fund may purchase other long-term
municipal obligations exempt from Federal but not California income taxes
("Municipal Bonds"). The Fund will maintain at least 65% of its assets in
California Municipal Bonds and at least 80% of its assets in California
Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds, except during interim periods pending
investment of the net proceeds of public offerings of the
11
<PAGE> 13
Fund's securities and during temporary defensive periods. Under normal
circumstances, at least 80% of the Fund's assets will be invested in municipal
obligations with remaining maturities of one year or more that are covered by
insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal at maturity and interest.
The Fund's investment objective is a fundamental policy that may not be changed
without a vote of a majority of the Fund's outstanding voting securities, as
defined below under "Investment Restrictions." There can be no assurance that
the investment objective of the Fund will be realized. At times the Fund may
seek to hedge its portfolio through the use of options and futures transactions
to reduce volatility in the net asset value of its shares of common stock.
The Fund ordinarily does not intend to realize significant investment
income that is subject to Federal and California income taxes. The Fund may
invest all or a portion of its assets in certain tax-exempt securities
classified as "private activity bonds" (in general, bonds that benefit
non-governmental entities) that may subject certain investors in the Fund to a
Federal alternative minimum tax.
The Fund also may invest in securities not issued by or on behalf of a
state or territory or by an agency or instrumentality thereof, if the Fund
nevertheless believes such securities pay interest or distributions that are
exempt from Federal income taxation ("Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt Securities").
Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt Securities may include securities issued by other
investment companies that invest in California Municipal Bonds and Municipal
Bonds, to the extent such investments are permitted by the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). Other Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt
Securities could include trust certificates or other instruments evidencing
interests in one or more long-term California Municipal Bonds or Municipal
Bonds. Certain Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt Securities may be characterized as
derivative instruments. Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt Securities are considered
"California Municipal Bonds" or "Municipal Bonds" for purposes of the Fund's
investment objective and policies.
Investment in shares of the Fund's common stock offers several potential
benefits. The Fund offers investors the opportunity to receive income exempt
from Federal and California income taxes by investing in a professionally
managed portfolio comprised primarily of investment grade insured California
Municipal Bonds. Investment in the Fund also relieves the investor of the
burdensome administrative details involved in managing a portfolio of California
Municipal Bonds. Additionally, the Investment Adviser will seek to enhance the
yield on the common stock by leveraging the Fund's capital structure through the
issuance of preferred stock. The benefits are at least partially offset by the
expenses involved in operating an investment company. Such expenses primarily
consist of the advisory fee and operational costs. Additionally, the use of
leverage involves certain expenses and special risk considerations. See "Risks
and Special Considerations of Leverage."
The investment grade California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds in
which the Fund will primarily invest are those California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds rated at the date of purchase in the four highest rating
categories of Standard & Poor's ("S&P"), Moody's Investors Services, Inc.
("Moody's") or Fitch IBCA, Inc. ("Fitch"), or, if unrated, are considered to be
of comparable quality by the Investment Adviser. In the case of long-term debt,
the investment grade rating categories are AAA through BBB for S&P, Aaa through
Baa for Moody's and AAA through BBB for Fitch. In the case of short-term notes,
the investment grade rating categories are SP-1+ through SP-3 for S&P, MIG-1
through MIG-3 for Moody's and F-1+ through F-3 for Fitch. In the case of
tax-exempt commercial paper, the investment grade rating categories are A-1+
through A-3 for S&P, Prime-1 through Prime-3 for Moody's
12
<PAGE> 14
and F-1+ through F-3 for Fitch. Obligations ranked in the lowest investment
grade rating category (BBB, SP-3 and A-3 for S&P; Baa, MIG-3 and Prime-3 for
Moody's; and BBB and F-3 for Fitch), while considered "investment grade," may
have certain speculative characteristics. There may be sub-categories or
gradations indicating relative standing within the rating categories set forth
above. See Appendix II to this Prospectus for a description of S&P's, Moody's
and Fitch's ratings of Municipal Bonds. In assessing the quality of California
Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds with respect to the foregoing requirements,
the Investment Adviser will take into account the portfolio insurance as well as
the nature of any letters of credit or similar credit enhancements to which
particular California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds are entitled and the
creditworthiness of the insurance company or the financial institution that
provided such insurance or credit enhancements. Consequently, if California
Municipal Bonds or Municipal Bonds are covered by insurance policies issued by
insurers whose claims-paying ability is rated AAA by S&P or Fitch or Aaa by
Moody's, the Investment Adviser may consider such municipal obligations to be
equivalent to AAA- or Aaa- rated securities, as the case may be, even though
such California Municipal Bonds or Municipal Bonds would generally be assigned a
lower rating if the rating were based primarily upon the credit characteristics
of the issuers without regard to the insurance feature. The insured California
Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds must also comply with the standards applied
by the insurance carriers in determining eligibility for portfolio insurance.
The Fund's investments may also include variable rate demand obligations
("VRDOs") and VRDOs in the form of participation interests ("Participating
VRDOs") in variable rate tax-exempt obligations held by a financial institution,
typically a commercial bank. The VRDOs in which the Fund may invest are tax-
exempt obligations, in the opinion of counsel to the issuer, that contain a
floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and a right of demand on
the part of the holder thereof to receive payment of the unpaid principal
balance plus accrued interest on a short notice period not to exceed seven days.
Participating VRDOs provide the Fund with a specified undivided interest (up to
100%) in the underlying obligation and the right to demand payment of the unpaid
principal balance plus accrued interest on the Participating VRDOs from the
financial institution on a specified number of days' notice, not to exceed seven
days. There is, however, the possibility that because of default or insolvency,
the demand feature of VRDOs or Participating VRDOs may not be honored. The Fund
has been advised by its counsel that the Fund should be entitled to treat the
income received on Participating VRDOs as interest from tax-exempt obligations
for Federal income tax purposes.
The average maturity of the Fund's portfolio securities will vary based
upon the Investment Adviser's assessment of economic and market conditions. The
net asset value of the shares of common stock of a closed-end investment
company, such as the Fund, which invests primarily in fixed-income securities,
changes as the general levels of interest rates fluctuate. When interest rates
decline, the value of a fixed-income portfolio generally can be expected to
rise. Conversely, when interest rates rise, the value of a fixed-income
portfolio generally can be expected to decline. Prices of longer-term securities
generally fluctuate more in response to interest rate changes than do short-term
or medium-term securities. These changes in net asset value are likely to be
greater in the case of a fund having a leveraged capital structure, as proposed
for the Fund. See "Risks and Special Considerations of Leverage."
The Fund intends to invest primarily in long-term California Municipal
Bonds and Municipal Bonds with a maturity of more than ten years. Also, the Fund
may invest in intermediate-term California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds
with a maturity of between three years and ten years. The Fund may invest in
short-term, tax-exempt securities, short-term U.S. Government securities,
repurchase
13
<PAGE> 15
agreements or cash. Such short-term securities or cash will not exceed 20% of
its total assets except during interim periods pending investment of the net
proceeds of public offerings of the Fund's securities or in anticipation of the
repurchase or redemption of the Fund's securities and temporary periods when, in
the opinion of the Investment Adviser, prevailing market or economic conditions
warrant. The Fund does not ordinarily intend to realize significant interest
income that is subject to Federal and California income taxes.
The Fund is classified as non-diversified within the meaning of the 1940
Act, which means that the Fund is not limited by the 1940 Act in the proportion
of its assets that it may invest in securities of a single issuer. However, the
Fund's investments will be limited so as to qualify the Fund for special tax
treatment afforded regulated investment companies under the Federal tax laws.
See "Taxes." To qualify, among other requirements, the Fund will limit its
investments so that, at the close of each quarter of the taxable year, (i) not
more than 25% of the market value of the Fund's total assets will be invested in
the securities (other than U.S. Government securities) of a single issuer, and
(ii) with respect to 50% of the market value of its total assets, not more than
5% of the market value of its total assets will be invested in the securities
(other than U.S. Government securities) of a single issuer. A fund that elects
to be classified as "diversified" under the 1940 Act must satisfy the foregoing
5% requirement with respect to 75% of its total assets. To the extent that the
Fund assumes large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, the
Fund's yield may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified
company as a result of changes in the financial condition or in the market's
assessment of the issuers.
PORTFOLIO INSURANCE
Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the Fund's assets will be
invested in California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds either (i) insured
under an insurance policy purchased by the Fund or (ii) insured under an
insurance policy obtained by the issuer thereof or any other party. The Fund
will seek to limit its investments to municipal bonds insured under insurance
policies issued by insurance carriers that have total admitted assets
(unaudited) of at least $75,000,000 and capital and surplus (unaudited) of at
least $50,000,000 and insurance claims-paying ability ratings of AAA from S&P or
Fitch or Aaa from Moody's. There can be no assurance that insurance from
insurance carriers meeting these criteria will be at all times available. See
Appendix III to this Prospectus for a brief description of S&P's, Fitch's and
Moody's insurance claims-paying ability ratings. Currently, it is anticipated
that a majority of the insured California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds in
the Fund's portfolio will be insured by the following insurance companies that
satisfy the foregoing criteria: AMBAC Indemnity Corporation, Financial Guaranty
Insurance Company, Financial Security Assurance and Municipal Bond Investors
Assurance Corporation. The Fund also may purchase California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds covered by insurance issued by any other insurance company that
satisfies the foregoing criteria. It is anticipated that initially a majority of
insured California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds held by the Fund will be
insured under policies obtained by parties other than the Fund.
The Fund may purchase, but has no obligation to purchase, separate
insurance policies (the "Policies") from insurance companies meeting the
criteria set forth above that guarantee the payment of principal and interest on
specified eligible California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds purchased by
the Fund. A California Municipal Bond or a Municipal Bond will be eligible for
coverage if it meets certain requirements of the insurance company set forth in
a Policy. In the event interest or principal on an insured California Municipal
Bond and Municipal Bond is not paid when due, the insurer will be
14
<PAGE> 16
obligated under its Policy to make such payment not later than 30 days after it
has been notified by, and provided with documentation from, the Fund that such
nonpayment has occurred.
The Policies will be effective only as to insured California Municipal
Bonds and Municipal Bonds beneficially owned by the Fund. In the event of a sale
of any California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds held by the Fund, the
issuer of the relevant Policy will be liable only for those payments of interest
and principal that are then due and owing. The Policies will not guarantee the
market value of the insured California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds or
the value of the shares of the Fund.
The insurer will not have the right to withdraw coverage on securities
insured by their Policies and held by the Fund so long as such securities remain
in the Fund's portfolio. In addition, the insurer may not cancel its Policies
for any reason except failure to pay premiums when due. The Board of Directors
of the Fund will reserve the right to terminate any of the Policies if it
determines that the benefits to the Fund of having its portfolio insured under
such policy are not justified by the expense involved.
The premiums for the Policies are paid by the Fund and the yield on the
Fund's portfolio is reduced thereby. The Investment Adviser estimates that the
cost of the annual premiums for the Policies currently ranges from approximately
.02 of 1% to .15 of 1% of the principal amount of the California Municipal Bonds
and Municipal Bonds covered by such Policies. The estimate is based on the
expected composition of the Fund's portfolio of California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds. Additional information regarding the Policies is set forth in
Appendix III to this Prospectus. In instances in which the Fund purchases
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds insured under policies obtained
by parties other than the Fund, the Fund does not pay the premiums for such
policies; rather, the cost of such policies may be reflected in the purchase
price of the California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds.
It is the intention of the Investment Adviser to retain any insured
securities that are in default or in significant risk of default and to place a
value on the insurance, which ordinarily will be the difference between the
market value of the defaulted security and the market value of similar
securities that are not in default. In certain circumstances, however, the
Investment Adviser may determine that an alternate value for the insurance, such
as the difference between the market value of the defaulted security and its par
value, is more appropriate. The Investment Adviser's ability to manage the
portfolio may be limited to the extent it holds defaulted securities, which may
limit its ability in certain circumstances to purchase other California
Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds. See "Net Asset Value" below for a more
complete description of the Fund's method of valuing defaulted securities and
securities that have a significant risk of default.
There can be no assurance that insurance with the terms and issued by
insurance carriers meeting the criteria described above will continue to be
available to the Fund. In the event the Board of Directors determines that such
insurance is unavailable or that the cost of such insurance outweighs the
benefits to the Fund, the Fund may modify the criteria for insurance carriers or
the terms of the insurance, or may discontinue its policy of maintaining
insurance for all or any of the California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds
held in the Fund's portfolio. Although the Investment Adviser periodically
reviews the financial condition of each insurer, there can be no assurance that
the insurers will be able to honor their obligations under all circumstances.
The portfolio insurance reduces financial or credit risk (i.e., the
possibility that the owners of the insured California Municipal Bonds or
Municipal Bonds will not receive timely scheduled payments of principal or
interest). However, the insured California Municipal Bonds or Municipal Bonds
are subject to
15
<PAGE> 17
market risk (i.e., fluctuations in market value as a result of changes in
prevailing interest rates or other market conditions).
DESCRIPTION OF CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BONDS AND MUNICIPAL BONDS
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds include debt obligations
issued to obtain funds for various public purposes, including construction of a
wide range of public facilities, refunding of outstanding obligations and
obtaining funds for general operating expenses and loans to other public
institutions and facilities. In addition, certain types of private activity
bonds("PABs") are issued by or on behalf of public authorities to finance
various privately operated facilities, including, among other things, airports,
public ports, mass commuting facilities, multifamily housing projects, as well
as facilities for water supply, gas, electricity, sewage or solid waste
disposal. For purposes of this prospectus, such obligations are Municipal Bonds
if the interest paid thereon is exempt from Federal income tax and as California
Municipal Bonds if the interest thereon is exempt from Federal and California
income taxes, even though such bonds may be PABs as discussed below. Also, for
purposes of this prospectus, Non-Municipal Tax-Exempt securities as discussed
above will be considered California Municipal Bonds or Municipal Bonds.
The two principal classifications of California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds are "general obligation" bonds and "revenue" bonds, which latter
category includes PABs and, for bonds issued on or before August 15, 1986,
industrial development bonds or "IDBs". General obligation bonds (other than
those of the State of California which has limited taxing powers) are typically
secured by the issuer's pledge of faith, credit and taxing power for the
repayment of principal and the payment of interest. Revenue or special
obligation bonds are typically payable only from the revenues derived from a
particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds
of a special excise tax or other specific revenue source such as from the user
of the facility being financed. PABs are in most cases revenue bonds and do not
generally constitute the pledge of the credit or taxing power of the issuer of
such bonds. The repayment of principal and the payment of interest on such
industrial development bonds depends solely on the ability of the user of the
facility financed by the bonds to meet its financial obligations and the pledge,
if any, of real and personal property so financed as security for such payment.
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds may also include "moral
obligation" bonds, which are normally issued by special purpose public
authorities. If an issuer of moral obligation bonds is unable to meet its
obligations, the repayment of such bonds becomes a moral commitment but not a
legal obligation of the state or municipality in question.
The Fund may purchase California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds
classified as PABs. Interest received on certain PABs is treated as an item of
"tax preference" for purposes of the Federal alternative minimum tax and may
impact the overall tax liability of certain investors in the Fund. There is no
limitation on the percentage of the Fund's assets that may be invested in
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds the interest on which is treated
as an item of "tax preference" for purposes of the Federal alternative minimum
tax. See "Taxes -- General." Also included within the general category of
California Municipal Bonds and/or Municipal Bonds are certificates of
participation ("COPs") executed and delivered for the benefit of government
authorities or entities to finance the acquisition or construction of equipment,
land and/or facilities. COPs represent participations in a lease, an installment
purchase contract or a conditional sales contract (hereinafter collectively
referred to as "lease obligations") relating to such equipment, land or
facilities. Although lease obligations typically do not constitute general
16
<PAGE> 18
obligations of the issuer for which the issuer's unlimited taxing power is
pledged, a lease obligation frequently is backed by the issuer's covenant to
budget for, appropriate and make the payments due under the lease obligation.
However, certain lease obligations contain "non-appropriation" clauses, which
provide that the issuer has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase
payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a
yearly basis. Although "non-appropriation" lease obligations are secured by the
lease property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might
prove difficult.
Federal tax legislation has limited the types and volume of such bonds the
interest on which qualifies for a Federal income tax exemption. As a result,
this legislation and legislation that may be enacted in the future may affect
the availability of California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds for
investment by the Fund.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BONDS
The Fund ordinarily will invest at least 80% of its total assets in
California Municipal Bonds, and therefore it is more susceptible to factors
adversely affecting issuers of California Municipal Bonds than is a municipal
bond mutual fund that is not concentrated in issuers of California Municipal
Bonds to this degree. Beginning in the 1990-91 fiscal year, the State of
California faced the worst economic, fiscal and budget conditions since the
1930's. On July 5, 1994, all three of the rating agencies rating the State of
California's long-term debt lowered their ratings of the State of California's
general obligation bonds. Moody's lowered its rating from "Aa" to "A1", S&P
lowered its rating from "A+" to "A" and Fitch lowered its rating from "AA" to
"A". A steady upturn has been under way since 1994 and as of the date of this
Prospectus, S&P and Fitch have upgraded their ratings to A+ and AA-,
respectively. No assurance can be given that ratings will not be lowered in the
future. FAM does not believe that the current economic conditions in California
will have a significant adverse effect on the ability of the Fund to invest in
high quality California Municipal Bonds. For a discussion of economic and other
conditions in the State of California, see Appendix I, "Economic and Other
Conditions in California."
OTHER INVESTMENT POLICIES
The Fund has adopted certain other policies as set forth below:
Borrowings. The Fund is authorized to borrow money in amounts of up to 5%
of the value of its total assets at the time of such borrowings; provided,
however, that the Fund is authorized to borrow moneys in amounts of up to
33 1/3% of the value of its total assets at the time of such borrowings to
finance the repurchase of its own common stock pursuant to tender offers or
otherwise to redeem or repurchase shares of preferred stock or for temporary,
extraordinary or emergency purposes. Borrowings by the Fund (commonly known, as
with the issuance of preferred stock, as "leveraging") create an opportunity for
greater total return since the Fund will not be required to sell portfolio
securities to repurchase or redeem shares but, at the same time, increase
exposure to capital risk. In addition, borrowed funds are subject to interest
costs that may offset or exceed the return earned on the borrowed funds.
When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions. The Fund may
purchase or sell California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds on a delayed
delivery basis or on a when-issued basis at fixed purchase or sale terms. These
transactions arise when securities are purchased or sold by the Fund with
payment and delivery taking place in the future. The purchase will be recorded
on the date the Fund enters into the commitment, and the value of the obligation
will thereafter be reflected in the calculation
17
<PAGE> 19
of the Fund's net asset value. The value of the obligation on the delivery day
may be more or less than its purchase price. A separate account of the Fund will
be established with its custodian consisting of cash, cash equivalents or liquid
securities having a market value at all times at least equal to the amount of
the commitment.
Indexed and Inverse Floating Obligations. The Fund may invest in
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds yielding a return based on a
particular index of value or interest rates. For example, the Fund may invest in
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds that pay interest based on an
index of Municipal Bond interest rates. The principal amount payable upon
maturity of certain California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds also may be
based on the value of an index. To the extent the Fund invests in these types of
Municipal Bonds, the Fund's return on such California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds will be subject to risk with respect to the value of the
particular index. Also, the Fund may invest in so-called "inverse floating
obligations" or "residual interest bonds" on which the interest rates typically
vary inversely with a short-term floating rate (which may be reset periodically
by a dutch auction, a remarketing agent, or by reference to a short-term
tax-exempt interest rate index). The Fund may purchase in the secondary market
synthetically-created inverse floating rate bonds evidenced by custodial or
trust receipts. Generally, income on inverse floating rate bonds will decrease
when short-term interest rates increase, and will increase when short-term
interest rates decrease. Such securities have the effect of providing a degree
of investment leverage, since they may increase or decrease in value in response
to changes, as an illustration, in market interest rates at a rate that is a
multiple (typically two) of the rate at which fixed-rate, long-term, tax-exempt
securities increase or decrease in response to such changes. As a result, the
market values of such securities generally will be more volatile than the market
values of fixed-rate tax-exempt securities. To seek to limit the volatility of
these securities, the Fund may purchase inverse floating obligations with
shorter-term maturities or limitations on the extent to which the interest rate
may vary. The Investment Adviser believes that indexed and inverse floating
obligations represent a flexible portfolio management instrument for the Fund
that allows the Investment Adviser to vary the degree of investment leverage
relatively efficiently under different market conditions.
Call Rights. The Fund may purchase a California Municipal Bond or
Municipal Bond issuer's right to call all or a portion of such California
Municipal Bond or Municipal Bond for mandatory tender for purchase (a "Call
Right"). A holder of a Call Right may exercise such right to require a mandatory
tender for the purchase of related California Municipal Bonds or Municipal
Bonds, subject to certain conditions. A Call Right that is not exercised prior
to the maturity of the related California Municipal Bond or Municipal Bond will
expire without value. The economic effect of holding both the Call Right and the
related California Municipal Bond or Municipal Bond is identical to holding a
California Municipal Bond or Municipal Bond as a non-callable security.
Repurchase Agreements. The Fund may invest in securities pursuant to
repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements may be entered into only with a
member bank of the Federal Reserve System or a primary dealer in U.S. Government
securities or an affiliate thereof. Under such agreements, the seller agrees,
upon entering into the contract, to repurchase the security at a mutually
agreed-upon time and price, thereby determining the yield during the term of the
agreement. The Fund may not invest in repurchase agreements maturing in more
than seven days if such investments, together with all other illiquid
investments, would exceed 15% of the Fund's net assets. In the event of default
by the seller under a repurchase agreement, the Fund may suffer time delays and
incur costs or possible losses in connection with the disposition of the
underlying securities.
18
<PAGE> 20
In general, for Federal income tax purposes, repurchase agreements are
treated as collateralized loans secured by the securities "sold." Therefore,
amounts earned under such agreements will not be considered tax-exempt interest.
OPTIONS AND FUTURES TRANSACTIONS
The Fund may hedge all or a portion of its portfolio investments against
fluctuations in interest rates through the use of options and certain financial
futures contracts and options thereon. While the Fund's use of hedging
strategies is intended to reduce the volatility of the net asset value of the
common stock, the net asset value of the common stock will fluctuate. There can
be no assurance that the Fund's hedging transactions will be effective. In
addition, because of the anticipated leveraged nature of the common stock,
hedging transactions will result in a larger impact on the net asset value of
the common stock than would be the case if the common stock were not leveraged.
Furthermore, the Fund may only engage in hedging activities from time to time
and may not necessarily be engaging in hedging activities when movements in
interest rates occur. The Fund has no obligation to enter into hedging
transactions and may not do so.
Certain Federal income tax requirements may limit the Fund's ability to
engage in hedging transactions. Gains from transactions in options and futures
contracts distributed to shareholders will be taxable as ordinary income or, in
certain circumstances, as long-term capital gains to shareholders. See
"Taxes -- Tax Treatment of Options and Futures Transactions." In addition, in
order to obtain ratings of the preferred stock from one or more nationally
recognized statistical ratings organizations ("NRSROs"), the Fund may be
required to limit its use of hedging techniques in accordance with the specified
guidelines of such organizations.
The following is a description of the options and futures transactions in
which the Fund may engage, limitations on the Fund's use of such transactions
and risks associated with these transactions. The investment policies with
respect to the hedging transactions of the Fund are not fundamental policies and
may be modified by the Board of Directors of the Fund without the approval of
the Fund's shareholders.
Writing Covered Call Options. The Fund may write (i.e., sell) covered call
options with respect to California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds it owns,
thereby giving the holder of the option the right to buy the underlying security
covered by the option from the Fund at the stated exercise price until the
option expires. The Fund writes only covered call options, which means that so
long as the Fund is obligated as the writer of a call option, it will own the
underlying securities subject to the option. The Fund may not write covered call
options on underlying securities in an amount exceeding 15% of the market value
of its total assets.
The Fund will receive a premium from writing a call option, which increases
the Fund's return on the underlying security in the event the option expires
unexercised or is closed out at a profit. By writing a call, the Fund limits its
opportunity to profit from an increase in the market value of the underlying
security above the exercise price of the option for as long as the Fund's
obligation as a writer continues. Covered call options may serve as a partial
hedge against a decline in the price of the underlying security. The Fund may
engage in closing transactions in order to terminate outstanding options that it
has written.
Purchase of Options. The Fund may purchase put options in connection with
its hedging activities. By buying a put the Fund has a right to sell the
underlying security at the exercise price, thus limiting the Fund's risk of loss
through a decline in the market value of the security until the put expires. The
amount
19
<PAGE> 21
of any appreciation in the value of the underlying security will be partially
offset by the amount of the premium paid for the put option and any related
transaction costs. Prior to its expiration, a put option may be sold in a
closing sale transaction; profit or loss from the sale will depend on whether
the amount received is more or less than the premium paid for the put option
plus the related transaction costs. A closing sale transaction cancels out the
Fund's position as the purchaser of an option by means of an offsetting sale of
an identical option prior to the expiration of the option it has purchased. In
certain circumstances, the Fund may purchase call options on securities held in
its portfolio on which it has written call options or on securities that it
intends to purchase. The Fund will not purchase options on securities if, as a
result of such purchase, the aggregate cost of all outstanding options on
securities held by the Fund would exceed 5% of the market value of the Fund's
total assets.
Financial Futures Contracts and Options. The Fund is authorized to
purchase and sell certain financial futures contracts and options thereon solely
for the purpose of hedging its investments in California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds against declines in value and to hedge against increases in the
cost of securities it intends to purchase. A financial futures contract
obligates the seller of a contract to deliver and the purchaser of a contract to
take delivery of the type of financial instrument covered by the contract or, in
the case of index-based futures contracts, to make and accept a cash settlement,
at a specific future time for a specified price. A sale of financial futures
contracts may provide a hedge against a decline in the value of portfolio
securities because such depreciation may be offset, in whole or in part, by an
increase in the value of the position in the financial futures contracts. A
purchase of financial futures contracts may provide a hedge against an increase
in the cost of securities intended to be purchased because such appreciation may
be offset, in whole or in part, by an increase in the value of the position in
the futures contracts.
The purchase or sale of a futures contract differs from the purchase or
sale of a security in that no price or premium is paid or received. Instead, an
amount of cash or securities acceptable to the broker equal to approximately 5%
of the contract amount must be deposited with the broker. This amount is known
as initial margin. Subsequent payments to and from the broker, called variation
margin, are made on a daily basis as the price of the financial futures contract
fluctuates making the long and short positions in the financial futures contract
more or less valuable.
The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts based on The
Bond Buyer Municipal Bond Index, a price-weighted measure of the market value of
40 large tax-exempt issues, and purchase and sell put and call options on such
financial futures contracts for the purpose of hedging California Municipal
Bonds and Municipal Bonds that the Fund holds or anticipates purchasing against
adverse changes in interest rates. The Fund also may purchase and sell financial
futures contracts on U.S. Government securities and purchase and sell put and
call options on such financial futures contracts for such hedging purposes. With
respect to U.S. Government securities, currently there are financial futures
contracts based on long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, U.S. Treasury notes, GNMA
Certificates and three-month U.S. Treasury bills.
Subject to policies adopted by the Board of Directors, the Fund also may
engage in transactions in other financial futures contracts, such as financial
futures contracts on other municipal bond indices that may become available, if
the Investment Adviser should determine that there is normally sufficient
correlation between the prices of such financial futures contracts and the
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds in which the Fund invests to make
such hedging appropriate.
20
<PAGE> 22
Over-The-Counter Options. The Fund may engage in options and futures
transactions on exchanges and in the over-the-counter markets ("OTC options").
In general, exchange-traded contracts are third-party contracts (i.e.,
performance of the parties' obligations is guaranteed by an exchange or clearing
corporation) with standardized strike prices and expiration dates. OTC options
transactions are two-party contracts with prices and terms negotiated by the
buyer and seller. See "Restrictions on OTC Options" below for information as to
restrictions on the use of OTC options.
Restrictions on OTC Options. The Fund will engage in transactions in OTC
options only with banks or dealers that have capital of at least $50 million or
whose obligations are guaranteed by an entity having capital of at least $50
million. Certain OTC options and assets used to cover OTC options written by the
Fund may be considered to be illiquid. The illiquidity of such options or assets
may prevent a successful sale of such options or assets, result in a delay of
sale, or reduce the amount of proceeds that might otherwise be realized.
Risk Factors in Options and Futures Transactions. Use of futures
transactions involves the risk of imperfect correlation in movements in the
price of financial futures contracts and movements in the price of the security
that is the subject of the hedge. If the price of the financial futures contract
moves more or less than the price of the security that is the subject of the
hedge, the Fund will experience a gain or loss that will not be completely
offset by movements in the price of such security. There is a risk of imperfect
correlation where the securities underlying financial futures contracts have
different maturities, ratings, geographic compositions or other characteristics
than the security being hedged. In addition, the correlation may be affected by
additions to or deletions from the index that serves as a basis for a financial
futures contract. Finally, in the case of financial futures contracts on U.S.
Government securities and options on such financial futures contracts, the
anticipated correlation of price movements between the U.S. Government
securities underlying the futures or options and California Municipal Bonds and
Municipal Bonds may be adversely affected by economic, political, legislative or
other developments that have a disparate impact on the respective markets for
such securities.
Under regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), the
futures trading activities described herein will not result in the Fund being
deemed a "commodity pool," as defined under such regulations, provided that the
Fund adheres to certain restrictions. In particular, the Fund may purchase and
sell financial futures contracts and options thereon (i) for bona fide hedging
purposes, without regard to the percentage of the Fund's assets committed to
margin and option premiums, and (ii) for non-hedging purposes if, immediately
thereafter, the sum of the amount of initial margin deposits on the Fund's
existing futures positions and option premiums entered into for non-hedging
purposes does not exceed 5% of the market value of the liquidation value of the
Fund's portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized
losses on any such transactions. Margin deposits may consist of cash or
securities acceptable to the broker and the relevant contract market.
When the Fund purchases a financial futures contract, or writes a put
option or purchases a call option thereon, it will maintain an amount of cash,
cash equivalents (e.g., commercial paper and daily tender adjustable notes) or
liquid securities in a segregated account with the Fund's custodian so that the
amount so segregated plus the amount of initial and variation margin held in the
account of its broker equals the market value of the financial futures contract,
thereby ensuring that the use of such financial futures contract is unleveraged.
21
<PAGE> 23
Certain risks are involved in options and futures transactions. The
Investment Adviser believes, however, that, because the Fund will engage in
options and futures transactions only for hedging purposes, the Fund's options
and futures portfolio strategies will not subject the Fund to those risks
associated with speculation in options and futures transactions.
The volume of trading in the exchange markets with respect to California
Municipal Bond or Municipal Bond options may be limited, and it is impossible to
predict the amount of trading interest that may exist in such options. In
addition, there can be no assurance that viable exchange markets will continue
to be available.
The Fund intends to enter into options and futures transactions, on an
exchange or in the over-the-counter market, only if there appears to be a liquid
secondary market for such options or futures. There can be no assurance,
however, that a liquid secondary market will exist at any specific time. Thus,
it may not be possible to close an options or futures transaction. The inability
to close options and futures positions also could have an adverse impact on the
Fund's ability to effectively hedge its portfolio. There is also the risk of
loss by the Fund of margin deposits or collateral in the event of bankruptcy of
a broker with which the Fund has an open position in an option or financial
futures contract.
The liquidity of a secondary market in a financial futures contract may be
adversely affected by "daily price fluctuation limits" established by commodity
exchanges that limit the amount of fluctuation in a financial futures contract
price during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has been reached in the
contract, no trades may be entered into at a price beyond the limit, thus
preventing the liquidation of open futures positions. Prices have in the past
moved beyond the daily limit on a number of consecutive trading days.
If it is not possible to close a financial futures position entered into by
the Fund, the Fund would continue to be required to make daily cash payments of
variation margin in the event of adverse price movements. In such a situation,
if the Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell portfolio securities to
meet daily variation margin requirements at a time when it may be
disadvantageous to do so.
The successful use of these transactions also depends on the ability of the
Investment Adviser to forecast correctly the direction and extent of interest
rate movements within a given time frame. To the extent these rates remain
stable during the period in which a financial futures contract is held by the
Fund or move in a direction opposite to that anticipated, the Fund may realize a
loss on the hedging transaction that is not fully or partially offset by an
increase in the value of portfolio securities. As a result, the Fund's total
return for such period may be less than if it had not engaged in the hedging
transaction. Furthermore, the Fund will only engage in hedging transactions from
time to time and may not necessarily be engaged in hedging transactions when
movements in interest rates occur.
RISKS AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF LEVERAGE
EFFECTS OF LEVERAGE
Within approximately three months after the completion of this offering,
the Fund intends to offer shares of preferred stock representing approximately
40% of the Fund's capital immediately after the issuance of such preferred
stock. There can be no assurance, however, that preferred stock representing
such percentage of the Fund's capital will actually be issued. Issuing the
preferred stock will result in the leveraging of the common stock. Although the
Fund's Board of Directors has not yet determined the terms of the preferred
stock offering, the Fund anticipates that the preferred stock will pay dividends
that will be
22
<PAGE> 24
adjusted over either relatively short-term periods (generally seven to 28 days)
or medium-term periods (up to five years). The dividend rate will be based upon
prevailing interest rates for debt obligations of comparable maturity. The
proceeds of the preferred stock offering will be invested in longer-term
obligations in accordance with the Fund's investment objective. The expenses of
the preferred stock, which will be borne by the Fund, will reduce the net asset
value of the common stock. Additionally, under certain circumstances, when the
Fund is required to allocate taxable income to holders of preferred stock, the
Fund anticipates that the terms of the preferred stock will require the Fund to
make an additional distribution to such holders in an amount approximately equal
to the tax liability resulting from such allocation (an "Additional
Distribution"). Because under normal market conditions, obligations with longer
maturities produce higher yields than short-term and medium-term obligations,
the Investment Adviser believes that the spread inherent in the difference
between the short-term and medium-term rates (and any Additional Distribution)
paid by the Fund as dividends on the preferred stock and the longer-term rates
received by the Fund may provide holders of common stock with a potentially
higher yield.
The use of leverage, however, involves certain risks to the holders of
common stock. For example, issuance of the preferred stock may result in higher
volatility of the net asset value of the common stock and potentially more
volatility in the market value of the common stock. In addition, changes in the
short-term and medium-term dividend rates on, and the amount of taxable income
allocable to, the preferred stock will affect the yield to holders of common
stock. Leverage will allow holders of common stock to realize a higher current
rate of return than if the Fund were not leveraged as long as the Fund, while
accounting for its costs and operating expenses, is able to realize a higher net
return on its investment portfolio than the then current dividend rate (and any
Additional Distribution) paid on the preferred stock. Similarly, since a pro
rata portion of the Fund's net realized capital gains are generally payable to
holders of common stock, the use of leverage will increase the amount of such
gains distributed to holders of common stock. However, short-term, medium-term
and long-term interest rates change from time to time as do their relationships
to each other (i.e., the slope of the yield curve) depending upon such factors
as supply and demand forces, monetary and tax policies and investor
expectations. Changes in any or all of such factors could cause the relationship
between short-term, medium-term and long-term rates to change (i.e., to flatten
or to invert the slope of the yield curve) so that short-term and medium-term
rates may substantially increase relative to the long-term obligations in which
the Fund may be invested. To the extent that the current dividend rate (and any
Additional Distribution) on the preferred stock approaches the net return on the
Fund's investment portfolio, the benefit of leverage to holders of common stock
will be decreased. If the current dividend rate (and any Additional
Distribution) on the preferred stock were to exceed the net return on the Fund's
portfolio, holders of common stock would receive a lower rate of return than if
the Fund were not leveraged. Similarly, since both the cost of issuing the
preferred stock and any decline in the value of the Fund's investments
(including investments purchased with the proceeds from any preferred stock
offering) will be borne entirely by holders of common stock, the effect of
leverage in a declining market would result in a greater decrease in net asset
value to holders of common stock than if the Fund were not leveraged. If the
Fund is liquidated, holders of preferred stock will be entitled to receive
liquidating distributions before any distribution is made to holders of common
stock.
In an extreme case, a decline in net asset value could affect the Fund's
ability to pay dividends on the common stock. Failure to make such dividend
payments could adversely affect the Fund's qualification as a regulated
investment company under the Federal tax laws. See "Taxes." However, the Fund
intends to take all measures necessary to make common stock dividend payments.
If the Fund's current investment
23
<PAGE> 25
income is ever insufficient to meet dividend payments on either the common stock
or the preferred stock, the Fund may have to liquidate certain of its
investments. In addition, the Fund will have the authority to redeem the
preferred stock for any reason and may redeem all or part of the preferred stock
under the following circumstances:
- if the Fund anticipates that the leveraged capital structure will result
in a lower rate of return for any significant amount of time to holders
of common stock than it can obtain if the common stock were not
leveraged,
- if the asset coverage for the preferred stock declines below 200% either
as a result of a decline in the value of the Fund's portfolio investments
or as a result of the repurchase of common stock in tender offers, or
- in order to maintain the asset coverage guidelines established by the
NRSROs that have rated the preferred stock.
Redemption of the preferred stock or insufficient investment income to make
dividend payments, may reduce the net asset value of the common stock and
require the Fund to liquidate a portion of its investments at a time when it may
be disadvantageous to do so.
As discussed under "Investment Advisory and Management Arrangements,"
during periods when the Fund has preferred stock outstanding, the fees paid to
the Investment Adviser for investment advisory and management services will be
higher than if the Fund did not issue preferred stock because the fees paid will
be calculated on the basis of the Fund's average weekly net assets, including
proceeds from the sale of preferred stock.
Assuming the use of leverage by issuing preferred stock (paying dividends
at a rate that generally will be adjusted every 28 days) in an amount
representing approximately 40% of the Fund's capital at an annual dividend rate
of 3.25% payable on such preferred stock based on market rates as of the date of
this prospectus, the annual return that the Fund's portfolio must experience
(net of expenses) in order to cover such dividend payments would be 1.30%.
The following table is designed to illustrate the effect on the return to a
holder of common stock of the leverage obtained by the issuance of preferred
stock representing approximately 40% of the Fund's capital, assuming
hypothetical annual returns on the Fund's portfolio of minus 10% to plus 10%. As
the table shows, leverage generally increases the return to stockholders when
portfolio return is positive and decreases the return when portfolio return is
negative. The figures appearing in the table are hypothetical and actual returns
may be greater or less than those appearing in the table.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assumed Portfolio Return (net of expenses).......... (10)% (5)% 0% 5% 10%
Corresponding Common Stock Return................... (19)% (11)% (2)% 6% 15%
</TABLE>
Leveraging the common stock cannot be fully achieved until preferred stock
is issued and the proceeds of such offering have been invested in long-term
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds.
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
If short-term or medium-term rates increase or other changes in market
conditions occur to the point where the Fund's leverage could adversely affect
holders of common stock as noted above (or in anticipation of such changes), the
Fund may attempt to shorten the average maturity of its investment
24
<PAGE> 26
portfolio in order to offset the negative impact of leverage. The Fund also may
attempt to reduce the degree to which it is leveraged by redeeming preferred
stock pursuant to the Fund's Articles Supplementary, which establish the rights
and preferences of the preferred stock, or otherwise by purchasing shares of
preferred stock. Purchases and redemptions of preferred stock, whether on the
open market or in negotiated transactions, are subject to limitations under the
1940 Act. In determining whether or not it is in the best interest of the Fund
and its stockholders to redeem or repurchase outstanding preferred stock, the
Board of Directors will take into account a variety of factors, including the
following:
- market conditions,
- the ratio of preferred stock to common stock, and
- the expenses associated with such redemption or repurchase.
If market conditions subsequently change, the Fund may sell previously unissued
shares of preferred stock or shares of preferred stock that the Fund had issued
but later repurchased or redeemed.
The Fund intends to apply for ratings of the preferred stock from one or
more NRSROs. In order to obtain these ratings, the Fund may be required to
maintain portfolio holdings that meet the specified guidelines of such
organizations. These guidelines may impose asset coverage requirements that are
more stringent than those imposed by the 1940 Act. The Fund does not anticipate
that these guidelines will impede the Investment Adviser from managing the
Fund's portfolio in accordance with the Fund's investment objective and
policies. Ratings on preferred stock issued by the Fund should not be confused
with ratings on the obligations held by the Fund.
Under the 1940 Act, the Fund is not permitted to issue shares of preferred
stock unless immediately after such issuance the net asset value of the Fund's
portfolio is at least 200% of the liquidation value of the outstanding preferred
stock (expected to equal the original purchase price of the outstanding shares
of preferred stock plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon and any
accumulated and unpaid Additional Distribution). In addition, the Fund is not
permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its common stock
unless, at the time of such declaration, the net asset value of the Fund's
portfolio (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or
distribution) is at least 200% of the liquidation value of the outstanding
preferred stock. Under the Fund's proposed capital structure, assuming the sale
of shares of preferred stock representing approximately 40% of the Fund's
capital, the net asset value of the Fund's portfolio is expected to be
approximately 250% of the liquidation value of the Fund's preferred stock. To
the extent possible, the Fund intends to purchase or redeem shares of preferred
stock from time to time to maintain coverage of preferred stock of at least
200%.
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
The following are fundamental investment restrictions of the Fund and,
prior to issuance of the preferred stock, may not be changed without the
approval of the holders of a majority of the Fund's outstanding shares of common
stock (which for this purpose and under the 1940 Act means the lesser of (i) 67%
of the shares of common stock represented at a meeting at which more than 50% of
the outstanding shares of common stock are represented or (ii) more than 50% of
the outstanding shares). Subsequent to the issuance of the preferred stock, the
following investment restrictions may not be changed without the approval of a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock and of the
25
<PAGE> 27
outstanding shares of preferred stock, voting together as a class, and the
approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of preferred stock, voting
separately as a class. The Fund may not:
1. Make investments for the purpose of exercising control or
management.
2. Purchase or sell real estate, commodities or commodity contracts;
provided that the Fund may invest in securities secured by real estate or
interests therein or issued by entities that invest in real estate or
interest therein, and the Fund may purchase and sell financial futures
contracts and options thereon.
3. Issue senior securities or borrow money except as permitted by
Section 18 of the 1940 Act.
4. Underwrite securities of other issuers except insofar as the Fund
may be deemed an underwriter under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
in selling portfolio securities.
5. Make loans to other persons, except that the Fund may purchase
California Municipal Bonds, Municipal Bonds and other debt securities and
enter into repurchase agreements in accordance with its investment
objective, policies and limitations.
6. Invest more than 25% of its total assets (taken at market value at
the time of each investment) in securities of issuers in a single industry;
provided that, for purposes of this restriction, states, municipalities and
their political subdivisions are not considered to be part of any industry.
Additional investment restrictions adopted by the Fund, which may be changed by
the Board of Directors without shareholder approval, provide that the Fund may
not:
a. Purchase securities of other investment companies, except to the
extent that such purchases are permitted by applicable law. Applicable law
currently prohibits the Fund from purchasing the securities of other
investment companies except if immediately thereafter not more than (i) 3%
of the total outstanding voting stock of such company is owned by the Fund,
(ii) 5% of the Fund's total assets, taken at market value, would be
invested in any one such company, (iii) 10% of the Fund's total assets,
taken at market value, would be invested in such securities, and (iv) the
Fund, together with other investment companies having the same investment
adviser and companies controlled by such companies, owns not more than 10%
of the total outstanding stock of any one closed-end investment company.
b. Mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or in any manner transfer, as
security for indebtedness, any securities owned or held by the Fund except
as may be necessary in connection with borrowings mentioned in investment
restriction (3) above or except as may be necessary in connection with
transactions in financial futures contracts and options thereon.
c. Purchase any securities on margin, except that the Fund may obtain
such short-term credit as may be necessary for the clearance of purchases
and sales of portfolio securities (the deposit or payment by the Fund of
initial or variation margin in connection with financial futures contracts
and options thereon is not considered the purchase of a security on
margin).
d. Make short sales of securities or maintain a short position or
invest in put, call, straddle or spread options, except that the Fund may
write, purchase and sell options and futures on California Municipal Bonds,
Municipal Bonds, U.S. Government obligations and related indices or
otherwise in connection with bona fide hedging activities and may purchase
and sell Call Rights to require mandatory tender for the purchase of
related California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds.
26
<PAGE> 28
If a percentage restriction on the investment or use of assets set forth
above is adhered to at the time a transaction is effected, later changes in
percentages resulting from changing values will not be considered a violation.
The Investment Adviser of the Fund and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") are owned and controlled by Merrill Lynch &
Co. ("ML & Co."). Because of the affiliation of Merrill Lynch with the
Investment Adviser, the Fund is prohibited from engaging in certain transactions
involving Merrill Lynch except pursuant to an exemptive order or otherwise in
compliance with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Included among such restricted transactions will be purchases from
or sales to Merrill Lynch of securities in transactions in which it acts as
principal. An exemptive order has been obtained that permits the Fund to effect
principal transactions with Merrill Lynch in high quality, short-term,
tax-exempt securities subject to conditions set forth in such order. The Fund
may consider in the future requesting an order permitting other principal
transactions with Merrill Lynch, but there can be no assurance that such
application will be made and, if made, that such order would be granted.
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Information about the Directors, executive officers and the portfolio
managers of the Fund, including their ages and their principal occupations
during the last five years is set forth below. Unless otherwise noted, the
address of each Director, executive officer and portfolio manager is 800
Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536.
TERRY K. GLENN (58) -- President and Director(1)(2) -- Executive Vice
President of the Investment Adviser and Merrill Lynch Asset Management, L.P.
("MLAM") (which terms as used herein include their corporate predecessors) since
1983; Executive Vice President and Director of Princeton Services, Inc.
("Princeton Services") since 1993; President of Princeton Funds Distributor,
Inc. ("PFD") since 1986 and Director thereof since 1991; President of Princeton
Administrators, L.P. since 1988.
RONALD W. FORBES (58) -- Director(2) -- 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New
York 12222. Professor of Finance, School of Business, State University of New
York at Albany since 1989; Consultant, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C. since
1995.
CYNTHIA A. MONTGOMERY (46) -- Director(2) -- Harvard Business School,
Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts 02163. Professor, Harvard Business
School since 1989; Associate Professor, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of
Management, Northwestern University from 1985 to 1989; Assistant Professor,
Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan from 1979
to 1985; Director, UNUM Corporation since 1990 and Director of Newell Co. since
1995.
CHARLES C. REILLY (67) -- Director(2) -- 9 Hampton Harbor Road, Hampton
Bays, New York 11946. Self-employed financial consultant since 1990; President
and Chief Investment Officer of Verus Capital, Inc. from 1979 to 1990; Senior
Vice President of Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder, Inc. from 1973 to 1990; Adjunct
Professor, Columbia University Graduate School of Business from 1990 to 1991;
Adjunct Professor, Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania from 1989 to
1990.
KEVIN A. RYAN (66) -- Director(2) -- 127 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut
Hill, Massachusetts 02167. Founder and current Director of The Boston University
Center for the Advancement of Ethics and Character; Professor of Education at
Boston University since 1982; formerly taught on the faculties of The University
of Chicago, Stanford University and Ohio State University.
27
<PAGE> 29
RICHARD R. WEST (61) -- Director(2) -- Box 604, Genoa, Nevada 89411.
Professor of Finance since 1984, and Dean from 1984 to 1993, and currently Dean
Emeritus of New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business
Administration; Director of Bowne & Co., Inc., Vornado Realty Trust, Inc.,
Vornado Operating Company and Alexander's Inc.
ARTHUR ZEIKEL (66) -- Director(1)(2) -- Chairman of the Investment Adviser
and MLAM from 1997 to 1999; President of the Investment Adviser and MLAM from
1977 to 1997; Chairman of Princeton Services from 1997 to 1999, Director thereof
from 1993 to 1999 and President thereof 1993 to 1997; Executive Vice President
of ML & Co. from 1990 to 1999.
VINCENT R. GIORDANO (54) -- Senior Vice President(1)(2) -- Senior Vice
President of the Investment Adviser and MLAM since 1984; Senior Vice President
of Princeton Services since 1993.
KENNETH A. JACOB (48) -- Vice President(1)(2) -- First Vice President of
MLAM since 1997; Vice President of MLAM from 1984 to 1997; Vice President of the
Investment Adviser since 1984.
ROBERT A. DIMELLA, CFA (32) -- Vice President and Portfolio
Manager(1)(2) -- Vice President of MLAM since 1997; Assistant Vice President of
MLAM from 1995 to 1997; Assistant Portfolio Manager of MLAM from 1993 to 1995.
WALTER O'CONNOR (37) -- Vice President and Portfolio
Manager(1)(2) -- Director (Municipal Tax Exempt) of MLAM since 1997; Vice
President of MLAM from 1993 to 1997.
DONALD C. BURKE (38) -- Vice President and Treasurer(1)(2) -- Senior Vice
President and Treasurer of the Investment Adviser and MLAM since 1999; Senior
Vice President and Treasurer of Princeton Services since 1999; Vice President of
PFD since 1999; First Vice President of MLAM from 1997 to 1999; Vice President
of MLAM from 1990 to 1997; Director of Taxation of MLAM since 1990.
WILLIAM E. ZITELLI, JR. (30) -- Secretary(1)(2) -- Attorney associated with
the Investment Adviser since 1998; Attorney associated with Pepper Hamilton LLP
from 1997 to 1998; Attorney associated with Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard
and Kristol from 1994 to 1997.
- ------------
(1) Interested person, as defined in the 1940 Act, of the Fund.
(2) Such Director or officer is a director, trustee or officer of one or more
additional investment companies for which the Investment Adviser or its
affiliate, MLAM, acts as investment adviser or manager.
In the event that the Fund issues preferred stock, in connection with the
election of the Fund's Directors, holders of shares of preferred stock, voting
as a separate class, will be entitled to elect two of the Fund's Directors, and
the remaining Directors will be elected by all holders of capital stock, voting
as a single class. See "Description of Capital Stock."
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with the Fund, the Investment
Adviser pays all compensation of officers and employees of the Fund as well as
the fees of all Directors who are affiliated persons of ML & Co. or its
subsidiaries.
The Fund pays each Director not affiliated with the Investment Adviser
(each a "non-affiliated Director") a fee of $ per year plus $ per
meeting attended, and pays all Director's out-of-pocket expenses relating to
attendance at meetings. The Fund also pays members of the Board's audit and
nominating committee (the "Committee"), which consists of all the non-affiliated
Directors, an annual fee of $ . The Chairman of the Committee receives an
additional annual fee of $ .
28
<PAGE> 30
The following table sets forth compensation to be paid by the Fund to the
non-affiliated Directors projected through the end of the Fund's first full
fiscal year and, for the calendar year ended December 31, 1998, the aggregate
compensation paid by all investment companies advised by the Investment Adviser
and its affiliate, MLAM ("FAM/MLAM Advised Funds"), to the non-affiliated
Directors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
PENSION OR COMPENSATION
RETIREMENT FROM FUND AND
AGGREGATE BENEFITS FAM/MLAM
COMPENSATION ACCRUED AS PART OF ADVISED FUNDS PAID
NAME OF DIRECTOR FROM FUND FUND EXPENSE TO DIRECTORS
- ---------------- ------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Ronald W. Forbes(1).......................... $ None $192,567
Cynthia A. Montgomery(1)..................... $ None $192,567
Charles C. Reilly(1)......................... $ None $362,858
Kevin A. Ryan(1)............................. $ None $192,567
Richard R. West(1)........................... $ None $334,125
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) The Directors serve on the boards of MLAM/FAM Advised Funds as follows: Mr.
Forbes (37 registered investment companies consisting of 50 portfolios); Ms.
Montgomery (37 registered investment companies consisting of 50 portfolios);
Mr. Reilly (56 registered investment companies consisting of 69 portfolios);
Mr. Ryan (37 registered investment companies consisting of 50 portfolios);
and Mr. West (58 registered investment companies consisting of 83
portfolios).
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
The Investment Adviser, which is owned and controlled by ML & Co., a
financial services holding company and the parent of Merrill Lynch, provides the
Fund with investment advisory and management services. The Asset Management
Group of ML & Co. (which includes the Investment Adviser) acts as the investment
adviser to more than 100 registered investment companies and offers investment
advisory services to individuals and institutional accounts. As of April 1999,
the Asset Management Group had a total of approximately $523 billion in
investment company and other portfolio assets under management (approximately
$40 billion of which were invested in municipal securities). This amount
includes assets managed for certain affiliates of the Investment Adviser. The
Investment Adviser is a limited partnership, the partners of which are ML & Co.
and Princeton Services. The principal business address of the Investment Adviser
is 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536.
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, subject to the supervision
of the Board of Directors of the Fund, the Investment Adviser is responsible for
the actual management of the Fund's portfolio. The responsibility for making
decisions to buy, sell or hold a particular security rests with the Investment
Adviser, subject to review by the Board of Directors.
The Investment Adviser provides the portfolio management for the Fund. Such
portfolio management will consider analyses from various sources (including
brokerage firms with which the Fund does business), make the necessary
investment decisions, and place orders for transactions accordingly. The
Investment Adviser will also be responsible for the performance of certain
administrative and management services for the Fund. Robert A. DiMella and
Walter O'Connor are the portfolio managers of the Fund and are primarily
responsible for the Fund's day-to-day management.
For the services provided by the Investment Adviser under the Investment
Advisory Agreement, the Fund will pay a monthly fee at an annual rate of 0.55 of
1% of the Fund's average weekly net assets (i.e., the average weekly value of
the total assets of the Fund, including proceeds from the issuance of shares of
29
<PAGE> 31
preferred stock, minus the sum of accrued liabilities of the Fund and
accumulated dividends on the shares of preferred stock). For purposes of this
calculation, average weekly net assets are determined at the end of each month
on the basis of the average net assets of the Fund for each week during the
month. The assets for each weekly period are determined by averaging the net
assets at the last business day of a week with the net assets at the last
business day of the prior week.
The Investment Advisory Agreement obligates the Investment Adviser to
provide investment advisory services and to pay all compensation of and furnish
office space for officers and employees of the Fund connected with investment
and economic research, trading and investment management of the Fund, as well as
the compensation of all Directors of the Fund who are affiliated persons of the
Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates. The Fund pays all other expenses
incurred in the operation of the Fund, including, among other things, expenses
for legal and auditing services, taxes, costs of printing proxies, listing fees,
if any, stock certificates and shareholder reports, charges of the custodian and
the transfer and dividend disbursing agent and registrar, fees and expenses with
respect to the issuance of preferred stock, Securities and Exchange Commission
fees, fees and expenses of non-interested Directors, accounting and pricing
costs, insurance, interest, brokerage costs, litigation and other extraordinary
or non-recurring expenses, mailing and other expenses properly payable by the
Fund. Accounting services are provided to the Fund by the Investment Adviser,
and the Fund reimburses the Investment Adviser for its costs in connection with
such services.
Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Investment Advisory
Agreement will remain in effect for a period of two years from the date of
execution and will remain in effect from year to year thereafter if approved
annually (a) by the Board of Directors of the Fund or by a majority of the
outstanding shares of the Fund and (b) by a majority of the Directors who are
not parties to such contract or interested persons (as defined in the 1940 Act)
of any such party. Such contract is not assignable and may be terminated without
penalty on 60 days' written notice at the option of either party thereto or by
the vote of the shareholders of the Fund.
Securities held by the Fund may also be held by, or be appropriate
investments for, other funds or investment advisory clients for which the
Investment Adviser or its affiliates act as an adviser. Because of different
objectives or other factors, a particular security may be bought for an advisory
client when other clients are selling the same security. If purchases or sales
of securities by the Investment Adviser for the Fund or other funds for which it
acts as investment adviser or for advisory clients arise for consideration at or
about the same time, transactions in such securities will be made, insofar as
feasible, for the respective funds and clients in a manner deemed equitable to
all. Transactions effected by the Investment Adviser (or its affiliates) on
behalf of more than one of its clients during the same period may increase the
demand for securities being purchased or the supply of securities being sold,
causing an adverse effect on price.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Board of Directors of the Fund has adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act that incorporates the Code of Ethics of the
Investment Adviser (together, the "Codes"). The Codes significantly restrict the
personal investing activities of all employees of the Investment Adviser and, as
described below, impose additional, more onerous, restrictions on Fund
investment personnel.
30
<PAGE> 32
The Codes require that all employees of the Investment Adviser preclear any
personal securities investment (with limited exceptions, such as U.S. Government
securities). The preclearance requirement and associated procedures are designed
to identify any substantive prohibition or limitation applicable to the proposed
investment. The substantive restrictions applicable to all employees of the
Investment Adviser include a ban on acquiring any securities in a "hot" initial
public offering and a prohibition from profiting on short-term trading
securities. In addition, no employee may purchase or sell any security that at
the time is being purchased or sold (as the case may be), or to the knowledge of
the employee is being considered for purchase or sale, by any fund advised by
the Investment Adviser. Furthermore, the Codes provide for trading "blackout
periods" that prohibit trading by investment personnel of the Fund within
periods of trading by the Fund in the same (or equivalent) security (15 or 30
days depending upon the transaction).
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Subject to policies established by the Board of Directors of the Fund, the
Investment Adviser is primarily responsible for the execution of the Fund's
portfolio transactions. In executing such transactions, the Investment Adviser
seeks to obtain the best results for the Fund, taking into account such factors
as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size
of order, difficulty of execution and operational facilities of the firm
involved and the firm's risk in positioning a block of securities. While the
Investment Adviser generally seeks reasonably competitive commission rates, the
Fund does not necessarily pay the lowest commission or spread available.
The Fund has no obligation to deal with any broker or dealer in the
execution of transactions in portfolio securities. Subject to providing the best
price and execution, securities firms that provide investment research to the
Investment Adviser, including Merrill Lynch, may receive orders for transactions
by the Fund. Research information provided to the Investment Adviser by
securities firms is supplemental. It does not replace or reduce the level of
services performed by the Investment Adviser and the expenses of the Investment
Adviser will not be reduced because it receives supplemental research
information.
The Fund invests in securities traded in the over-the-counter markets, and
the Fund intends to deal directly with dealers who make markets in the
securities involved, except in those circumstances where better prices and
execution are available elsewhere. Under the 1940 Act, except as permitted by
exemptive order, persons affiliated with the Fund, including Merrill Lynch, are
prohibited from dealing with the Fund as principal in the purchase and sale of
securities. Since transactions in the over-the-counter market usually involve
transactions with dealers acting as principals for their own accounts, the Fund
does not deal with Merrill Lynch and its affiliates in connection with such
transactions except that, pursuant to exemptive orders obtained by the
Investment Adviser, the Fund may engage in principal transactions with Merrill
Lynch in high quality, short-term, tax-exempt securities. See "Investment
Restrictions." However, affiliated persons of the Fund, including Merrill Lynch,
serve as its brokers in certain over-the-counter transactions conducted on an
agency basis.
The Fund also may purchase tax-exempt debt instruments in individually
negotiated transactions with the issuers. Because an active trading market may
not exist for such securities, the prices that the Fund
31
<PAGE> 33
may pay for these securities or receive on their resale may be lower than that
for similar securities with a more liquid market.
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER
The Fund may dispose of securities without regard to the time they have
been held when such action, for defensive or other reasons, appears advisable to
the Investment Adviser. While it is not possible to predict turnover rates with
any certainty, presently it is anticipated that the Fund's annual portfolio
turnover rate, under normal circumstances, should be less than 100%. (The
portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or
sales of portfolio securities for the particular fiscal year by the monthly
average of the value of the portfolio securities owned by the Fund during the
particular fiscal year. For purposes of determining this rate, all securities
whose maturities at the time of acquisition are one year or less are excluded.)
A high portfolio turnover rate results in greater transaction costs, which are
borne directly by the Fund and also has certain tax consequences for
stockholders.
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
The Fund intends to distribute dividends of all or a portion of its net
investment income monthly to holders of common stock. It is expected that the
Fund will commence paying dividends to holders of common stock within
approximately 90 days of the date of this prospectus. From and after issuance of
the preferred stock, monthly dividends to holders of common stock normally will
consist of all or a portion of its net investment income remaining after the
payment of dividends (and any Additional Distribution) on the preferred stock.
The Fund may at times pay out less than the entire amount of net investment
income earned in any particular period and may at times pay out such accumulated
undistributed income in addition to net investment income earned in other
periods in order to permit the Fund to maintain a more stable level of dividends
to holders of common stock. As a result, the dividend paid by the Fund to
holders of common stock for any particular period may be more or less than the
amount of net investment income earned by the Fund during such period. For
Federal tax purposes, the Fund is required to distribute substantially all of
its net investment income for each calendar year. All net realized capital
gains, if any, will be distributed pro rata at least annually to holders of
common stock and any preferred stock. While any shares of preferred stock are
outstanding, the Fund may not declare any cash dividend or other distribution on
its common stock, unless at the time of such declaration, (i) all accumulated
preferred stock dividends, including any Additional Distribution, have been
paid, and (ii) the net asset value of the Fund's portfolio (determined after
deducting the amount of such dividend or other distribution) is at least 200% of
the liquidation value of the outstanding preferred stock (expected to equal the
original purchase price of the outstanding shares of preferred stock plus any
accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon and any accumulated but unpaid
Additional Distribution). If the Fund's ability to make distributions on its
common stock is limited, such limitation could under certain circumstances
impair the ability of the Fund to maintain its qualification for taxation as a
regulated investment company, which would have adverse tax consequences for
holders of common stock. See "Taxes."
See "Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan" for information concerning the
manner in which dividends and distributions to holders of common stock may be
automatically reinvested in shares of common stock of the Fund. Dividends and
distributions may be taxable to shareholders under certain circumstances as
discussed below, whether they are reinvested in shares of the Fund or received
in cash.
32
<PAGE> 34
The yield on the Fund's common stock will vary from period to period
depending on factors including, but not limited to, market conditions, the
timing of the Fund's investment in portfolio securities, the securities
comprising the Fund's portfolio, changes in tax-exempt interest rates (which may
not change to the same extent or in the same direction as taxable rates)
including changes in the relationship between short-term rates and long-term
rates, the amount and timing of the issuance of the Fund's preferred stock, the
effects of preferred stock leverage on the common stock discussed above under
"Risks and Special Considerations of Leverage", the timing of the investment of
preferred stock proceeds in portfolio securities, the Fund's net assets and its
operating expenses. Consequently, the Fund cannot guarantee any particular yield
on its shares and the yield for any given period is not an indication or
representation of future yields on Fund shares.
TAXES
GENERAL
The Fund intends to elect and to qualify for the special tax treatment
afforded regulated investment companies ("RICs") under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). As long as it so qualifies, in any taxable
year in which it distributes at least 90% of its taxable net income and 90% of
its tax-exempt net income (see below), the Fund (but not its shareholders) will
not be subject to Federal income tax to the extent that it distributes its net
investment income and net realized capital gains. The Fund intends to distribute
substantially all of such income.
The Code requires a RIC to pay a nondeductible 4% excise tax to the extent
the RIC does not distribute, during each calendar year, 98% of its ordinary
income, determined on a calendar year basis, and 98% of its capital gains,
determined, in general, on an October 31 year-end, plus certain undistributed
amounts from previous years. The required distributions, however, are based only
on the taxable income of a RIC. The excise tax, therefore, generally will not
apply to the tax-exempt income of a RIC, such as the Fund, that pays
exempt-interest dividends.
The Fund intends to qualify to pay "exempt-interest dividends" as defined
in Section 852(b)(5) of the Code. Under such section if, at the close of each
quarter of its taxable year, at least 50% of the value of its total assets
consists of obligations the interest on which is excludable from gross income
for Federal income tax purposes ("tax-exempt obligations") under Section 103(a)
of the Code (relating generally to obligations of a state or local governmental
unit), the Fund shall be qualified to pay exempt-interest dividends to its
shareholders. Exempt-interest dividends are dividends or any part thereof paid
by the Fund that are attributable to interest on tax-exempt obligations and
designated by the Fund as exempt-interest dividends in a written notice mailed
to the Fund's shareholders within 60 days after the close of its taxable year.
To the extent that the dividends distributed to the Fund's shareholders are
derived from interest income excludable from gross income for Federal income tax
purposes under Code Section 103(a) and are properly designated as
exempt-interest dividends, they will be excludable from a shareholder's gross
income for Federal income tax purposes. Exempt-interest dividends are included,
however, in determining the portion, if any, of a person's social security and
railroad retirement benefits subject to Federal income taxes. Each shareholder
is advised to consult a tax adviser with respect to whether exempt-interest
dividends retain the exclusion under Code Section 103(a) if such shareholder
would be treated as a
33
<PAGE> 35
"substantial user" or "related person" under Code Section 147(a) with respect to
property financed with the proceeds of an issue of PABs or IDBs if any, held by
the Fund.
So long as, at the close of each quarter the Fund's taxable year, at least
50% of the value of the Fund's total assets consists of California Municipal
Bonds, the portion of exempt-interest dividends paid from interest received by
the Fund from California Municipal Bonds also will be exempt from California
income tax. However, exempt-interest dividends paid to a corporate shareholder
subject to California state franchise tax will not be exempt from California
taxation. Shareholders subject to income taxation by states other than
California will realize a lower after-tax rate of return than California
shareholders since the dividends distributed by the Fund generally will not be
exempt, to any significant degree, from income taxation by such other states.
The Fund will inform shareholders annually as to the portion of the Fund's
distributions that constitutes exempt-interest dividends and the portion that is
exempt from California income taxes. Interest on indebtedness incurred or
continued to purchase or carry Fund shares is not deductible for Federal or
California income tax purposes to the extent attributable to exempt-interest
dividends.
To the extent that the Fund's distributions are derived from interest on
its taxable investments or from an excess of net short-term capital gains over
net long-term capital losses ("ordinary income dividends"), such distributions
will be considered taxable ordinary income for Federal and California income tax
purposes. Distributions, if any, from an excess of net long-term capital gains
over net short-term capital losses derived from the sale of securities or from
certain transactions in futures or options ("capital gain dividends") are
taxable as long-term capital gains for Federal income tax purposes, regardless
of the length of time the shareholder has owned Fund shares and, for California
income tax purposes, are treated as capital gains which are taxed at ordinary
income tax rates. Certain categories of capital gains are taxable at different
rates. Generally not later than 60 days after the close of its taxable year, the
Fund will provide its shareholders with a written notice designating the amounts
of any exempt-interest dividends or capital gain dividends, as well as any
amount of capital gain dividends in the different categories of capital gain
referred to above. Distributions by the Fund, whether from exempt-income,
ordinary income or capital gains, are not eligible for the dividends received
deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.
All or a portion of the Fund's gain from the sale or redemption of
tax-exempt obligations purchased at a market discount will be treated for
Federal income tax purposes as ordinary income rather than capital gain. This
rule may increase the amount of ordinary income dividends received by
shareholders. Distributions in excess of the Fund's earnings and profits will
first reduce the adjusted tax basis of a holder's shares and, after such
adjusted tax basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such
holder (assuming the shares are held as a capital asset). Any loss upon the sale
or exchange of Fund shares held for six months or less will be disallowed to the
extent of any exempt-interest dividends received by the shareholder. In
addition, any such loss that is not disallowed under the rule stated above will
be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of any capital gain dividends
received by the shareholder. If the Fund pays a dividend in January that was
declared in the previous October, November or December to shareholders of record
on a specified date in one of such months, then such dividend will be treated
for tax purposes as being paid by the Fund and received by its shareholders on
December 31 of the year in which such dividend was declared.
34
<PAGE> 36
The Internal Revenue Service ("Service") has taken the position in a
revenue ruling that if a RIC has more than one class of shares, it may designate
distributions made to each class in any year as consisting of no more than such
class's proportionate share of particular types of income, including
exempt-interest income and net long-term capital gains. A class's proportionate
share of a particular type of income is determined according to the percentage
of total dividends paid by the RIC during such year that was paid to such class.
Consequently, when common stock and one or more series of preferred stock are
outstanding, the Fund intends to designate distributions made to the classes as
consisting of particular types of income in accordance with each class's
proportionate share of such income. Thus, the Fund will designate dividends paid
as exempt-interest dividends in a manner that allocates such dividends among the
holders of common stock and series of preferred stock in proportion to the total
dividends paid to each class during the taxable year, or otherwise as required
by applicable law. Capital gain dividends will similarly be allocated among the
classes in proportion to the total dividends paid to each class during the
taxable year, or otherwise as required by applicable law. When capital gain or
other taxable income is allocated to holders of preferred stock pursuant to the
allocation rules described above, the terms of the preferred stock may require
the Fund to make an additional distribution to or otherwise compensate such
holders for the tax liability resulting from such allocation.
The Code subjects interest received on certain otherwise tax-exempt
securities to a Federal alternative minimum tax. The Federal alternative minimum
tax applies to interest received on certain "private activity bonds" issued
after August 7, 1986. Private activity bonds are bonds that, although
tax-exempt, are used for purposes other than those generally performed by
governmental units and that benefit non-governmental entities (e.g., bonds used
for industrial development or housing purposes). Income received on such bonds
is classified as an item of "tax preference," which could subject certain
investors in such bonds, including shareholders of the Fund, to an increased
Federal alternative minimum tax. The Fund intends to purchase such "private
activity bonds" and will report to shareholders within 60 days after calendar
year-end the portion of its dividends declared during the year that constitutes
an item of tax preference for Federal alternative minimum tax purposes. The Code
further provides that corporations are subject to a Federal alternative minimum
tax based, in part, on certain differences between taxable income as adjusted
for other tax preferences and the corporation's "adjusted current earnings,"
which more closely reflect a corporation's economic income. Because an
exempt-interest dividend paid by the Fund will be included in adjusted current
earnings, a corporate shareholder may be required to pay a Federal alternative
minimum tax on exempt-interest dividends paid by the Fund.
The Fund may invest in instruments the return on which includes
nontraditional features such as indexed principal or interest payments
("nontraditional instruments"). These instruments may be subject to special tax
rules under which the Fund may be required to accrue and distribute income
before amounts due under the obligations are paid. In addition, it is possible
that all or a portion of the interest payments on such nontraditional
instruments could be recharacterized as taxable ordinary income.
If at any time when shares of preferred stock are outstanding the Fund does
not meet the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act, the Fund will be
required to suspend distributions to holders of common stock until the asset
coverage is restored. See "Dividends and Distributions." This may prevent the
Fund from distributing at least 90% of its net investment income and may,
therefore, jeopardize the Fund's qualification for taxation as a RIC. If the
Fund were to fail to qualify as a RIC, some or all of the distributions paid by
the Fund would be fully taxable for Federal and California income tax purposes.
35
<PAGE> 37
Upon any failure to meet the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act, the
Fund, in its sole discretion, may redeem shares of preferred stock in order to
maintain or restore the requisite asset coverage and avoid the adverse
consequences to the Fund and its shareholders of failing to qualify as a RIC.
There can be no assurance, however, that any such action would achieve such
objectives.
As noted above, the Fund must distribute annually at least 90% of its net
taxable and tax-exempt interest income. A distribution will only be counted for
this purpose if it qualifies for the dividends paid deduction under the Code.
Some types of preferred stock that the Fund currently contemplates issuing may
raise an issue as to whether distributions on such preferred stock are
"preferential" under the Code and, therefore, not eligible for the dividends
paid deduction. The Fund intends to issue preferred stock that counsel advises
will not result in the payment of a preferential dividend and may seek a private
letter ruling from the Service to that effect. If the Fund ultimately relies
solely on a legal opinion when it issues such preferred stock, there is no
assurance that the Service would agree that dividends on the preferred stock are
not preferential. If the Service successfully disallowed the dividends paid
deduction for dividends on the preferred stock, the Fund could be disqualified
as a RIC. In this case, dividends on the common stock would not be exempt from
Federal income taxes. Additionally, the Fund would be subject to the Federal
alternative minimum tax.
The value of shares acquired pursuant to the Fund's dividend reinvestment
plan will generally be excluded from gross income to the extent that the cash
amount reinvested would be excluded from gross income. If, when the Fund's
shares are trading at a premium over net asset value, the Fund issues shares
pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan that have a greater fair market value
than the amount of cash reinvested, it is possible that all or a portion of such
discount (which may not exceed 5% of the fair market value of the Fund's shares)
could be viewed as a taxable distribution. If the discount is viewed as a
taxable distribution, it is also possible that the taxable character of this
discount would be allocable to all of the shareholders, including shareholders
who do not participate in the dividend reinvestment plan. Thus, shareholders who
do not participate in the dividend reinvestment plan, as well as dividend
reinvestment plan participants, might be required to report as ordinary income a
portion of their distributions equal to their allocable share of the discount.
Ordinary income dividends paid to shareholders who are nonresident aliens
or foreign entities will be subject to a 30% United States withholding tax under
existing provisions of the Code applicable to foreign individuals and entities
unless a reduced rate of withholding or a withholding exemption is provided
under applicable treaty law. Nonresident shareholders are urged to consult their
own tax advisers concerning the applicability of the United States withholding
tax.
Under certain Code provisions, some taxpayers may be subject to 31%
withholding tax on certain ordinary income dividends and on capital gain
dividends and redemption payments ("backup withholding"). Generally,
shareholders subject to backup withholding are those for whom no certified
taxpayer identification number is on file with the Fund or who, to the Fund's
knowledge, have furnished an incorrect number. When establishing an account, an
investor must certify under penalty of perjury that such number is correct and
that such investor is not otherwise subject to backup withholding.
The Code provides that every shareholder required to file a tax return must
include for information purposes on such return the amount of exempt-interest
dividends received from all sources (including the Fund) during the taxable
year.
36
<PAGE> 38
TAX TREATMENT OF OPTIONS AND FUTURES TRANSACTIONS
The Fund may purchase or sell municipal bond index financial futures
contracts and interest rate financial futures contracts on U.S. Government
securities. The Fund may also purchase and write call and put options on such
financial futures contracts. In general, unless an election is available to the
Fund or an exception applies, such options and financial futures contracts that
are "Section 1256 contracts" will be "marked to market" for Federal income tax
purposes at the end of each taxable year, i.e., each such option or financial
futures contract will be treated as sold for its fair market value on the last
day of the taxable year, and any gain or loss attributable to Section 1256
contracts will be 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gain or loss.
Application of these rules to Section 1256 contracts held by the Fund may alter
the timing and character of distributions to shareholders. The mark-to-market
rules outlined above, however, will not apply to certain transactions entered
into by the Fund solely to reduce the risk of changes in price or interest rates
with respect to its investments.
Code Section 1092, which applies to certain "straddles," may affect the
taxation of the Fund's sales of securities and transactions in financial futures
contracts and related options. Under Section 1092, the Fund may be required to
postpone recognition for tax purposes of losses incurred in certain sales of
securities and certain closing transactions in financial futures contracts or
the related options.
The foregoing is a general and abbreviated summary of the applicable
provisions of the Code and Treasury Regulations and California income and
corporate franchise tax laws presently in effect. For the complete provisions,
reference should be made to the pertinent Code sections, the Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder and California income and corporate franchise
tax laws. The Code and the Treasury Regulations, as well as the California tax
laws, are subject to change by legislative, judicial or administrative action
either prospectively or retroactively.
Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding specific
questions as to Federal, state, local or foreign taxes.
AUTOMATIC DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
Pursuant to the Fund's Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the "Plan"),
unless a holder of common stock otherwise elects, all dividend and capital gains
distributions will be automatically reinvested by , as agent
for shareholders in administering the Plan (the "Plan Agent"), in additional
shares of common stock of the Fund. Holders of common stock who elect not to
participate in the Plan will receive all distributions in cash paid by check
mailed directly to the shareholder of record (or, if the shares are held in
street or other nominee name, then to such nominee) by , as dividend
paying agent. Such participants may elect not to participate in the Plan and to
receive all distributions of dividends and capital gains in cash by sending
written instructions to , as dividend paying agent, at the address
set forth below. Participation in the Plan is completely voluntary and may be
terminated or resumed at any time without penalty by written notice if received
by the Plan Agent not less than ten days prior to any dividend record date;
otherwise, such termination or resumption will be effective with respect to any
subsequently declared dividend or distribution.
Whenever the Fund declares an income dividend or a capital gains
distribution (collectively, referred to as "dividends") payable either in shares
or in cash, non-participants in the Plan will receive cash, and
37
<PAGE> 39
participants in the Plan will receive the equivalent in shares of common stock.
The shares will be acquired by the Plan Agent for the participant's account,
depending upon the circumstances described below, either (i) through receipt of
additional unissued but authorized shares of common stock from the Fund ("newly
issued shares") or (ii) by purchase of outstanding shares of common stock on the
open market ("open-market purchases") on the New York Stock Exchange (the
"NYSE") or elsewhere. If on the payment date for the dividend, the net asset
value per share of the common stock is equal to or less than the market price
per share of the common stock plus estimated brokerage commissions (such
condition being referred to herein as "market premium"), the Plan Agent will
invest the dividend amount in newly issued shares on behalf of the participant.
The number of newly issued shares of common stock to be credited to the
participant's account will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the
dividend by the net asset value per share on the date the shares are issued,
provided that the maximum discount from the then current market price per share
on the date of issuance may not exceed 5%. If on the dividend payment date the
net asset value per share is greater than the market value (such condition being
referred to herein as "market discount"), the Plan Agent will invest the
dividend amount in shares acquired on behalf of the participant in open-market
purchases. Prior to the time the shares of common stock commence trading on the
NYSE, participants in the Plan will receive any dividends in newly issued
shares.
In the event of a market discount on the dividend payment date, the Plan
Agent will have until the last business day before the next date on which the
shares trade on an "ex-dividend" basis or in no event more than 30 days after
the dividend payment date (the "last purchase date") to invest the dividend
amount in shares acquired in open-market purchases. It is contemplated that the
Fund will pay monthly income dividends. Therefore, the period during which
open-market purchases can be made will exist only from the payment date on the
dividend through the date before the next "ex-dividend" date, which typically
will be approximately ten days. If, before the Plan Agent has completed its
open-market purchases, the market price of a share of common stock exceeds the
net asset value per share, the average per share purchase prices paid by the
Plan Agent may exceed the net asset value of the Fund's shares, resulting in the
acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend had been paid in newly issued
shares on the dividend payment date. Because of the foregoing difficulty with
respect to open-market purchases, the Plan provides that if the Plan Agent is
unable to invest the full dividend amount in open-market purchases during the
purchase period or if the market discount shifts to a market premium during the
purchase period, the Plan Agent will cease making open-market purchases and will
invest the uninvested portion of the dividend amount in newly issued shares at
the close of business on the last purchase date.
The Plan Agent maintains all shareholders' accounts in the Plan and
furnishes written confirmation of all transactions in the account, including
information needed by shareholders for tax records. Shares in the account of
each Plan participant will be held by the Plan Agent in non-certificated form in
the name of the participant and each shareholder's proxy will include those
shares purchased or received pursuant to the Plan. The Plan Agent will forward
all proxy solicitation materials to participants and vote proxies for shares
held pursuant to the Plan in accordance with the instructions of the
participants.
In the case of shareholders such as banks, brokers or nominees that hold
shares for others who are the beneficial owners, the Plan Agent will administer
the Plan on the basis of the number of shares certified from time to time by the
record shareholders as representing the total amount registered in the record
shareholder's name and held for the account of beneficial owners who are to
participate in the Plan.
38
<PAGE> 40
There will be no brokerage charges with respect to shares issued directly
by the Fund as a result of dividends or capital gains distributions payable
either in shares or in cash. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share
of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agent's open-market
purchases in connection with the reinvestment of dividends.
The automatic reinvestment of dividends and distributions will not relieve
participants of any Federal, state or local income tax that may be payable (or
required to be withheld) on such dividends. See "Taxes."
Shareholders participating in the Plan may receive benefits not available
to shareholders not participating in the Plan. If the market price plus
commissions of the Fund's shares is above the net asset value, participants in
the Plan will receive shares of the Fund at less than they could otherwise
purchase them and will have shares with a cash value greater than the value of
any cash distribution they would have received on their shares. If the market
price plus commissions is below the net asset value, participants will receive
distributions in shares with a net asset value greater than the value of any
cash distribution they would have received on their shares. However, there may
be insufficient shares available in the market to make distributions in shares
at prices below the net asset value. Also, since the Fund does not redeem its
shares, the price on resale may be more or less than the net asset value. See
"Taxes" for a discussion of tax consequences of the Plan.
Experience under the Plan may indicate that changes are desirable.
Accordingly, the Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan. There
is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan; however, the Fund
reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the
participants.
All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Plan Agent
at .
MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT OPTION
Purchasers of shares of common stock of the Fund through Merrill Lynch in
this offering will have an investment option consisting of the right to reinvest
the net proceeds from a sale of such shares (the "Original Shares") in Class D
initial sales charge shares of certain Merrill Lynch-sponsored open-end mutual
funds ("Eligible Class D Shares") at their net asset value, without the
imposition of the initial sales charge, if the conditions set forth below are
satisfied. First, the sale of the Original Shares must be made through Merrill
Lynch, and the net proceeds therefrom must be immediately reinvested in Eligible
Class D Shares. Second, the Original Shares must have been either acquired in
this offering or be shares representing reinvested dividends from shares of
common stock acquired in this offering. Third, the Original Shares must have
been continuously maintained in a Merrill Lynch securities account. Fourth,
there must be a minimum purchase of $250 to be eligible for the investment
option. Class D shares of the mutual funds are subject to an account maintenance
fee at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the average daily net asset value of
such mutual fund. The Eligible Class D Shares may be redeemed at any time at the
next determined net asset value, subject in certain cases to a redemption fee.
Prior to the time the shares of common stock commence trading on the NYSE, the
distributor for the mutual funds will advise Merrill Lynch Financial Consultants
as to those mutual funds that offer the investment option described above.
39
<PAGE> 41
NET ASSET VALUE
Net asset value per share of common stock is determined as of 15 minutes
after the close of business on the NYSE (generally, the NYSE closes at 4:00
p.m., Eastern time) on the last business day in each week. For purposes of
determining the net asset value of a share of common stock, the value of the
securities held by the Fund plus any cash or other assets (including interest
accrued but not yet received) minus all liabilities (including accrued expenses)
and the aggregate liquidation value of the outstanding shares of preferred stock
is divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding at such
time. Expenses, including the fees payable to the Investment Adviser, are
accrued daily.
The California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds in which the Fund
invests are traded primarily in the over-the-counter markets. In determining net
asset value, the Fund utilizes the valuations of portfolio securities furnished
by a pricing service approved by the Board of Directors. The pricing service
typically values portfolio securities at the bid price or the yield equivalent
when quotations are readily available. California Municipal Bonds and Municipal
Bonds for which quotations are not readily available are valued at fair market
value on a consistent basis as determined by the pricing service using a matrix
system to determine valuations. The procedures of the pricing service and its
valuations are reviewed by the officers of the Fund under the general
supervision of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has determined in
good faith that the use of a pricing service is a fair method of determining the
valuation of portfolio securities. Positions in futures contracts are valued at
closing prices for such contracts established by the exchange on which they are
traded, or if market quotations are not readily available, are valued at fair
value on a consistent basis using methods determined in good faith by the Board
of Directors.
The Fund determines and makes available for publication the net asset value
of its common stock weekly. Currently, the net asset values of shares of
publicly traded closed-end investment companies investing in debt securities are
published in Barron's, the Monday edition of The Wall Street Journal, and the
Monday and Saturday editions of The New York Times.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The Fund is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of capital stock, par
value $.10 per share, all of which shares are initially classified as common
stock. The Board of Directors is authorized, however, to classify or reclassify
any unissued shares of capital stock by setting or changing the preferences,
conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption. Within
approximately three months after completion of the offering of the common stock
described herein, the Fund intends to reclassify an amount of unissued common
stock as preferred stock and at that time to offer shares of preferred stock
representing approximately 40% of the Fund's capital immediately after the
issuance of such preferred stock. There is no assurance that such preferred
stock will be issued.
COMMON STOCK
Shares of common stock, when issued and outstanding, will be fully paid and
non-assessable. Shareholders are entitled to share pro rata in the net assets of
the Fund available for distribution to shareholders upon liquidation of the
Fund. Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each share held.
40
<PAGE> 42
So long as any shares of the Fund's preferred stock are outstanding,
holders of common stock will not be entitled to receive any net income of or
other distributions from the Fund unless all accumulated dividends on preferred
stock have been paid and unless asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with
respect to preferred stock would be at least 200% after giving effect to such
distributions. See "Preferred Stock" below.
The Fund will send unaudited reports at least semi-annually and audited
annual financial statements to all of its shareholders.
The Investment Adviser provided the initial capital for the Fund by
purchasing 6,667 shares of common stock of the Fund for $100,005. As of the date
of this prospectus, the Investment Adviser owned 100% of the outstanding shares
of common stock of the Fund. The Investment Adviser may be deemed to control the
Fund until such time as it owns less than 25% of the outstanding shares of the
Fund.
PREFERRED STOCK
It is anticipated that the Fund's shares of preferred stock will be issued
in one or more series, with rights as determined by the Board of Directors, by
action of the Board of Directors without the approval of the holders of common
stock. Under the 1940 Act, the Fund is permitted to have outstanding more than
one series of preferred stock so long as no single series has a priority over
another series as to the distribution of assets of the Fund or the payment of
dividends. Holders of common stock have no preemptive right to purchase any
shares of preferred stock that might be issued. It is anticipated that the net
asset value per share of the preferred stock will equal its original purchase
price per share plus accumulated dividends per share.
The Fund's Board of Directors has declared its intention to authorize an
offering of shares of preferred stock (representing approximately 40% of the
Fund's capital immediately after the issuance of such preferred stock) within
approximately three months after completion of the offering of common stock,
subject to market conditions and to the Board's continuing to believe that
leveraging the Fund's capital structure through the issuance of preferred stock
is likely to achieve the benefits to the holders of common stock described in
the prospectus. Although the terms of the preferred stock, including its
dividend rate, voting rights, liquidation preference and redemption provisions
will be determined by the Board of Directors (subject to applicable law and the
Fund's Articles of Incorporation), the initial series of preferred stock will be
structured to carry either a relatively short-term dividend rate, in which case
periodic redetermination of the dividend rate will be made at relatively short
intervals (generally seven or 28 days), or a medium-term dividend rate, in which
case periodic redetermination of the dividend rate will be made at intervals of
up to five years. In either case, such redetermination of the dividend rate will
be made through an auction or remarketing procedure. Additionally, under certain
circumstances, when the Fund is required to allocate taxable income to holders
of the preferred stock, it is anticipated that the terms of the preferred stock
will require the Fund to make an Additional Distribution (as defined in "Risks
and Special Considerations of Leverage -- Effects of Leverage") to such holders.
The Board also has indicated that it is likely that the liquidation preference,
voting rights and redemption provisions of the preferred stock will be as stated
below. The Fund's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, together with any
Articles Supplementary, is referred to below as the "Charter."
41
<PAGE> 43
Liquidation Preference. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Fund, the holders of shares of
preferred stock will be entitled to receive a preferential liquidating
distribution (expected to equal the original purchase price per share plus an
amount equal to accumulated and unpaid dividends whether or not earned or
declared and any accumulated and unpaid Additional Distribution) before any
distribution of assets is made to holders of common stock. After payment of the
full amount of the liquidating distribution to which they are entitled, the
preferred stockholders will not be entitled to any further participation in any
distribution of assets by the Fund. A consolidation or merger of the Fund with
or into any other corporation or corporations or a sale of all or substantially
all of the assets of the Fund will not be deemed to be a liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Fund.
Voting Rights. Except as otherwise indicated in this prospectus and except
as otherwise required by applicable law, holders of shares of preferred stock
will have equal voting rights with holders of shares of common stock (one vote
per share) and will vote together with holders of common stock as a single
class.
In connection with the election of the Fund's directors, holders of shares
of preferred stock, voting as a separate class, will be entitled to elect two of
the Fund's directors, and the remaining directors will be elected by all holders
of capital stock, voting as a single class. So long as any preferred stock is
outstanding, the Fund will have not less than five directors. If at any time
dividends on shares of the Fund's preferred stock shall be unpaid in an amount
equal to two full years' dividends thereon, the holders of all outstanding
shares of preferred stock, voting as a separate class, will be entitled to elect
a majority of the Fund's directors until all dividends in default have been paid
or declared and set apart for payment.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of the preferred stock, voting as a separate class, will be required to (i)
authorize, create or issue any class or series of stock ranking prior to any
series of preferred stock with respect to payment of dividends or the
distribution of assets on liquidation or (ii) amend, alter or repeal the
provisions of the Charter, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, so as
to adversely affect any of the contract rights expressly set forth in the
Charter of holders of preferred stock.
Redemption Provisions. It is anticipated that shares of preferred stock
will generally be redeemable at the option of the Fund at a price equal to their
liquidation preference plus accumulated but unpaid dividends to the date of
redemption plus, under certain circumstances, a redemption premium. Shares of
preferred stock will also be subject to mandatory redemption at a price equal to
their liquidation preference plus accumulated but unpaid dividends to the date
of redemption upon the occurrence of certain specified events, such as the
failure of the Fund to maintain asset coverage requirements for the preferred
stock specified by the rating agencies that issue ratings on the preferred
stock.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
The Fund's Articles of Incorporation include provisions that could have the
effect of limiting the ability of other entities or persons to acquire control
of the Fund or to change the composition of its Board of Directors and could
have the effect of depriving shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares
at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from
seeking to obtain control of the Fund. A director may be removed from office
with or without cause, but only by vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of
the votes entitled to be voted on the matter. A director elected by all the
holders of capital
42
<PAGE> 44
stock may be removed only by action of such holders, and a director elected by
the holders of preferred stock may be removed only by action of such holders.
In addition, the Articles of Incorporation require the favorable vote of
the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the Fund's shares of capital stock then
entitled to be voted, voting as a single class, to approve, adopt or authorize
the following:
- a merger or consolidation or statutory share exchange of the Fund with
other corporations,
- a sale of all or substantially all of the Fund's assets (other than in
the regular course of the Fund's investment activities), or
- a liquidation or dissolution of the Fund, unless such action has been
approved, adopted or authorized by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of
the total number of Directors fixed in accordance with the by-laws, in
which case the affirmative vote of a majority of the Fund's shares of
capital stock is required. Following the proposed issuance of the
preferred stock, it is anticipated that the approval, adoption or
authorization of the foregoing would also require the favorable vote of a
majority of the Fund's shares of preferred stock then entitled to be
voted, voting as a separate class.
In addition, conversion of the Fund to an open-end investment company would
require an amendment to the Fund's Articles of Incorporation. The amendment
would have to be declared advisable by the Board of Directors prior to its
submission to shareholders. Such an amendment would require the favorable vote
of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the Fund's outstanding shares of capital
stock (including any preferred stock) entitled to be voted on the matter, voting
as a single class (or a majority of such shares if the amendment was previously
approved, adopted or authorized by two-thirds of the total number of Directors
fixed in accordance with the by-laws), and, assuming preferred stock is issued,
the affirmative vote of a majority of outstanding shares of preferred stock of
the Fund, voting as a separate class. Such a vote also would satisfy a separate
requirement in the 1940 Act that the change be approved by the shareholders.
Shareholders of an open-end investment company may require the company to redeem
their shares of common stock at any time (except in certain circumstances as
authorized by or under the 1940 Act) at their net asset value, less such
redemption charge, if any, as might be in effect at the time of a redemption.
All redemptions will be made in cash. If the Fund is converted to an open-end
investment company, it could be required to liquidate portfolio securities to
meet requests for redemption, and the common stock would no longer be listed on
a stock exchange.
Conversion to an open-end investment company would also require redemption
of all outstanding shares of preferred stock and would require changes in
certain of the Fund's investment policies and restrictions, such as those
relating to the issuance of senior securities, the borrowing of money and the
purchase of illiquid securities.
The Board of Directors has determined that the 66 2/3% voting requirements
described above, which are greater than the minimum requirements under Maryland
law or the 1940 Act, are in the best interests of shareholders generally.
Reference should be made to the Charter on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the full text of these provisions.
43
<PAGE> 45
CUSTODIAN
The Fund's securities and cash are held under a custodial agreement with
.
UNDERWRITING
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (the "Underwriter") has
agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of a Purchase Agreement with the
Fund and the Investment Adviser, to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock
from the Fund. The Underwriter is committed to purchase all of such shares if
any are purchased.
The Underwriter has advised the Fund that it proposes initially to offer
the shares of common stock to the public at the public offering price set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus. There is no sales charge or underwriting
discount charged to investors on purchases of shares of common stock in the
offering. The Investment Adviser or an affiliate has agreed to pay the
Underwriter from its own assets a commission in connection with the sale of
shares of common stock in the offering in the amount of $
per share. Such payment is equal to % of the initial public offering price
per share. The Underwriter also has advised the Fund that from this amount the
Underwriter may pay a concession to certain dealers not in excess of $ per
share on sales by such dealers. After the initial public offering, the public
offering price and other selling terms may be changed. Investors must pay for
shares of common stock purchased in the offering on or before June , 1999.
The Fund has granted the Underwriter an option, exercisable for 45 days
after the date hereof, to purchase up to 750,000 additional shares of common
stock to cover over-allotments, if any, at the initial offering price.
The Underwriter may engage in certain transactions that stabilize the price
of the shares of common stock. Such transactions consist of bids or purchases
for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of the shares of
common stock.
If the Underwriter creates a short position in the shares of common stock
in connection with the offering, i.e., if it sells more shares of common stock
than are set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the Underwriter may
reduce that short position by purchasing shares of common stock in the open
market. The Underwriter also may elect to reduce any short position by
exercising all or part of the over-allotment option described above.
The Underwriter also may impose a penalty bid on certain selling group
members. This means that if the Underwriter purchases shares of common stock in
the open market to reduce the Underwriter's short position or to stabilize the
price of the shares of common stock, it may reclaim the amount of the selling
concession from the selling group members who sold those shares of common stock
as part of the offering.
In general, purchases of a security for the purpose of stabilization or to
reduce a short position could cause the price of the security to be higher than
it might be in the absence of such purchases. The imposition of a penalty bid
might also have an effect on the price of a security to the extent that it were
to discourage resales of the security.
Neither the Fund nor the Underwriter makes any representation or prediction
as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described
above may have on the price of the shares of
44
<PAGE> 46
common stock. In addition, neither the Fund nor the Underwriter makes any
representation that the Underwriter will engage in such transactions or that
such transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the shares of
the common stock. The Fund plans to apply to list its shares of common stock on
the NYSE or another national securities exchange. However, during an initial
period which is not expected to exceed two weeks from the date of this
prospectus, the Fund's common stock will not be listed on any securities
exchange. Additionally, before it begins trading, the Underwriter does not
intend to make a market in the Fund's common stock, although a limited market
may develop. Thus, it is anticipated that investors may not be able to buy and
sell shares of the Fund during such period. In order to meet the requirements
for listing, the Underwriter has undertaken to sell lots of 100 or more shares
to a minimum of 2,000 beneficial owners.
The Fund anticipates that the Underwriter may from time to time act as a
broker in connection with the execution of its portfolio transactions. The Fund
has obtained an exemptive order permitting it to engage in certain principal
transactions with the Underwriter involving high quality, short-term, tax-exempt
securities subject to certain conditions. See "Investment Restrictions" and
"Portfolio Transactions."
The Underwriter is an affiliate of the Investment Adviser of the Fund.
The Fund and the Investment Adviser have agreed to indemnify the
Underwriter against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act of 1933.
TRANSFER AGENT, DIVIDEND DISBURSING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent, dividend disbursing agent and registrar for the shares
of common stock of the Fund is .
LEGAL OPINIONS
Certain legal matters in connection with the common stock offered hereby
will be passed upon for the Fund and the Underwriter by Brown & Wood LLP, New
York, New York.
EXPERTS
The statement of assets, liabilities and capital of the Fund as of
, 1999 included in this prospectus has been so included in reliance
on the report of , independent auditors, and on their
authority as experts in auditing and accounting. The selection of independent
auditors is subject to ratification by shareholders of the Fund.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Fund is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the 1940 Act and in accordance therewith is required to
file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Any such reports, proxy statements and
other information can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities
of the
45
<PAGE> 47
Commission at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20549, and at the following regional offices of the Commission: Regional
Office, at Seven World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York 10048;
Pacific Regional Office, at 5670 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th Floor, Los Angeles,
California 90036; and Midwest Regional Office, at Northwestern Atrium Center,
500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. Copies of
such materials can be obtained from the public reference section of the
Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed
rates. The Commission maintains a Web site at http://www.sec.gov containing
reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding
registrants, including the Fund, that file electronically with the Commission.
Reports, proxy statements and other information concerning the Fund can also be
inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New
York, New York 10005.
Additional information regarding the Fund is contained in the Registration
Statement on Form N-2, including amendments, exhibits and schedules thereto,
relating to such shares filed by the Fund with the Commission in Washington,
D.C. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the
Registration Statement, including any amendments, exhibits and schedules
thereto. For further information with respect to the Fund and the shares offered
hereby, reference is made to the Registration Statement. Statements contained in
this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to
are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy
of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such
reference. A copy of the Registration Statement may be inspected without charge
at the Commission's principal office in Washington, D.C., and copies of all or
any part thereof may be obtained from the Commission upon the payment of certain
fees prescribed by the Commission.
YEAR 2000 ISSUES
Many computer systems were designed using only two digits to designate
years. These systems may not be able to distinguish the Year 2000 from the Year
1900 (commonly known as the "Year 2000 Problem"). The Fund could be adversely
affected if the computer systems used by the Investment Adviser or other Fund
service providers do not properly address this problem before January 1, 2000.
The Investment Adviser expects to have addressed this problem before then, and
does not anticipate that the services it provides will be adversely affected.
The Fund's other service providers have told the Investment Adviser that they
also expect to resolve the Year 2000 Problem, and the Investment Adviser will
continue to monitor the situation as the Year 2000 approaches. However, if the
problem has not been fully addressed, the Fund could be negatively affected. The
Year 2000 Problem could also have a negative impact on the issuers of securities
in which the Fund invests, and this could hurt the Fund's investment returns.
The State of California relies on information technology in every aspect of
its operation and the risks posed by the Year 2000 Problem are not confined to
computer systems. They also include problems presented by embedded microchips
(products or systems that contain microchips to perform functions such as
traffic control, controlling instruments used in hospitals, and monitoring of
the California Aquaduct). Although the State reports it is making substantial
progress overall, the State cannot predict whether all critical systems will be
ready and tested by late 1999 or what impact failure of any information
technology system might have. The State Treasurer's Office (which operates the
system responsible for debt service
46
<PAGE> 48
payments on State debt) has reported that it is scheduled to complete its
remediation efforts by December 31, 1999. However, there is no centralized
mechanism for reporting on the Year 2000 Problem remediation efforts of the over
1,200 other public agencies in California.
47
<PAGE> 49
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholder,
MuniHoldings California Insured Fund V, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities and capital of
MuniHoldings California Insured Fund V, Inc. as of June , 1999. This financial
statement is the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such statement of assets, liabilities and capital presents
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MuniHoldings
California Insured Fund V, Inc. as of June , 1999 in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
48
<PAGE> 50
MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA INSURED FUND V, INC.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
JUNE , 1999
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
ASSETS
Cash................................................... $100,005
Offering costs (Note 1)................................
--------
Total assets......................................
--------
LIABILITIES
Liabilities and accrued expenses (Note 1)..............
--------
NET ASSETS.................................................. $100,005
========
CAPITAL
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share; 200,000,000
shares authorized; 6,667 shares issued and outstanding
(Note 1).............................................. $ 667
Paid-in Capital in excess of par....................... 99,338
--------
Total Capital-Equivalent to $15.00 net asset value per
share of Common Stock (Note 1)........................ $100,005
========
</TABLE>
NOTES TO STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION
The Fund was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April
5, 1999 as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company and has
had no operations other than the sale to Fund Asset Management, L.P. (the
"Investment Adviser") of an aggregate of 6,667 shares of common stock for
$100,005 on June , 1999. The General Partner of the Investment Adviser is an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
The Investment Adviser, on behalf of the Fund, will incur organization
costs estimated at $ . Direct costs relating to the public offering of
the Fund's shares will be charged to capital at the time of issuance of shares.
NOTE 2. MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
The Fund has engaged the Investment Adviser to provide investment advisory
and management services to the Fund. The Investment Adviser will receive a
monthly fee for advisory services at the annual rate of 0.55 of 1% of the Fund's
average weekly net assets of the Fund, including any proceeds from the issuance
of Preferred Stock. The Investment Adviser or affiliate will pay Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated a commission in the amount of % of the
price to the public in connection with the initial public offering of the Fund's
Common Stock.
NOTE 3. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
The Fund intends to qualify as a "regulated investment company" and as such
(and by complying with the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended) will not be subject to Federal income tax on taxable income
(including realized capital gains) that is distributed to shareholders.
49
<PAGE> 51
APPENDIX I
ECONOMIC AND OTHER CONDITIONS IN CALIFORNIA
The following information is a brief summary of factors affecting the
economy of the State of California and does not purport to be a complete
description of such factors. Other factors will affect issuers. The summary is
based primarily upon one or more of the most recent publicly available offering
statements relating to debt offerings of California issuers, however, it has not
been updated. The Fund has not independently verified the information.
GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The economy of the State of California (sometimes referred to herein as the
"State") is the largest among the 50 states and one of the largest in the world.
This diversified economy has major components in agriculture, manufacturing,
high technology, trade, entertainment, tourism, construction and services.
California's July 1, 1998 population of over 33.2 million represented over
13% of the total United States population. As of July 1, 1990, the population of
29,944,000 represented an increase of over 6 million persons, or 26%, during the
decade of the 1980s.
California's population is concentrated in metropolitan areas. As of the
April 1, 1990 census, 96% of the State's population resided in the 23
Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the State. As of July 1, 1997, the five-county
Los Angeles area accounted for 49%, with 16.0 million residents. The 10-county
San Francisco Bay Area represented 21%, with a population of 6.9 million.
From 1990-1993, the State suffered through a severe recession, the worst
since the 1930s, heavily influenced by large cutbacks in defense/aerospace
industries and military base closures and by a major drop in real estate
construction. California's economy has been recovering and growing steadily
since the start of 1994. The current economic expansion is marked by strong
growth in high technology manufacturing and services, including computer
software, electronic manufacturing and motion picture/television production;
growth is also strong in other business services, both nonresidential and
residential construction and local education.
In the Governor's Budget released on January 8, 1999, the Department of
Finance projected that the California economy will show moderate growth through
2000, at a slower pace than in 1998. The economic expansion has been marked by
strong growth in high technology business services (including computer
software), construction, and computer and electronic components manufacturing.
The Asian economic crisis, which began in 1997, has had some dampening effects
on the State's economy, particularly in high technology manufacturing. The
widening trade deficit, continuing weakness in Asia, initial signs of economic
weakness in Latin America, and uncertainty in stock prices worldwide all support
moderating growth in 1999. Other impacts of the international situation may help
California, such as the reduction in long-term interest rates.
THE STATE
Fiscal Years Prior to 1995-1996. The State's budget problems in the early
1990s were caused by a combination of external economic conditions and a
structural imbalance in that the largest general fund programs (K-14 education,
health, welfare and corrections) were increasing faster than the revenue base,
50
<PAGE> 52
driven by the State's rapid population growth. These pressures are expected to
continue as population trends maintain strong demand for health and welfare
services, as the school age population continues to grow, and as the State's
corrections program responds to a "Three Strikes" law enacted in 1994, which
requires mandatory life prison terms for certain third-time felony offenders. In
addition, the State's health and welfare programs are in a transition period as
a result of recent federal and state welfare reform initiatives.
As a result of these factors and others, and especially because the severe
recession between 1990-1994 reduced revenues and increased expenditures for
social welfare programs, from the late 1980s until 1992-93, the State had a
period of budget imbalance. During this period, expenditures exceeded revenues
in four out of six years, and the State accumulated and sustained a budget
deficit in its budget reserve, the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties
("SFEU") approaching $2.8 billion at its peak at June 30, 1993. Starting in the
1990-91 Fiscal Year and for each fiscal year thereafter, each budget required
multibillion dollar actions to bring projected revenues and expenditures into
balance. The State Legislature and the Governor of the State (the "Governor")
agreed on the following principal steps to produce Budget Acts in the years
1991-92 to 1994-95, although not all these actions were taken in each year.
1. significant cuts in health and welfare program expenditures;
2. transfers of program responsibilities and funding from the State
to local governments (referred to as "realignment"), coupled with some
reduction in mandates on local government;
3. transfer of about $3.6 billion in local property tax revenues from
cities, counties, redevelopment agencies and some other districts to local
school districts, thereby reducing State funding for schools under
Proposition 98 (discussed below);
4. reduction in growth of support for higher education programs,
coupled with increases in student fees, through the 1994-95 Fiscal Year;
5. maintenance of the minimum Proposition 98 funding guarantee for
K-14 schools, and the disbursement of additional funds to keep a constant
level of about $4,200 per K-12 pupils through the 1993-94 Fiscal Year;
6. revenue increases, most of which were for a short duration;
7. increased reliance on aid from the federal government to offset
the costs of incarcerating, educating and providing health and welfare
services to illegal immigrants, although during this time frame, most of
the additional aid requested by the Administration was not received; and
8. various one-time adjustments and accounting changes.
Despite these budget actions, as noted, the effects of the recession led to
large, unanticipated deficits in the budget reserve, the SFEU, as compared to
projected positive balances. By the 1993-94 Fiscal Year, the accumulated deficit
was so large that it was impractical to budget to retire it in one year, so a
two-year program was implemented, using the issuance of revenue anticipation
warrants to carry a portion of the deficit over the end of the fiscal year. When
the economy failed to recover sufficiently in 1993-94, a second two-year plan
was implemented in 1994-95, again using cross-fiscal year revenue anticipation
warrants to partly finance the deficit into the 1995-96 fiscal year.
51
<PAGE> 53
Another consequence of the accumulated budget deficits, together with other
factors such as disbursement of funds to local school districts "borrowed" from
future fiscal years and hence not shown in the annual budget, was to
significantly reduce the State's cash resources available to pay its ongoing
obligations. For several years during the recession, the State was forced to
rely increasingly on external debt markets to meet its cash needs, as a
succession of notes and revenue anticipation warrants were issued in the period
from June 1992 to July 1994, often needed to pay previously maturing notes or
warrants. These borrowings were used also in part to spread out the repayment of
the accumulated budget deficit over the end of a fiscal year, as noted earlier.
The last and largest of these borrowings was $4.0 billion of revenue
anticipation warrants which were issued in July 1994 and matured on April 25,
1996. However, the State's improved cash position in 1995-96 allowed it to repay
the $4.0 billion Revenue Anticipation Warrant issue on April 25, 1996, and to
issue only $2.0 billion of revenue anticipation notes during the fiscal year,
which matured on June 28, 1996.
1995-96 THROUGH 1997-98 FISCAL YEARS
The State's financial condition improved markedly during the 1995-96,
1996-97 and 1997-98 fiscal years, with a combination of better than expected
revenues, slowdown in growth of social welfare programs, and continued spending
restraint based on the actions taken in earlier years. The State's cash position
also improved, and no external deficit borrowing has occurred over the end of
these three fiscal years.
The economy grew strongly during these fiscal years, and as a result, the
General Fund took in substantially greater tax revenues (around $2.2 billion in
1995-96, $1.6 billion in 1996-97 and $2.2 billion in 1997-98) than were
initially planned when the budgets were enacted. These additional funds were
largely directed to school spending as mandated by Proposition 98, and to make
up shortfalls from reduced federal health and welfare aid in 1995-96 and
1996-97. The accumulated budget deficit from the recession years was finally
eliminated. The Department of Finance estimates that the State's budget reserve
(the SFEU) totaled $639.8 million as of June 30, 1997 and $1.782 billion at June
30, 1998.
On August 18, 1997, the Governor signed the 1997-98 Budget Act, but vetoed
about $314 million of specific spending items, primarily in health and welfare
and education areas from both the General Fund and Special Funds. The Governor
announced that he was prepared to restore about $200 million of education
spending upon satisfactory completion of legislation on an education testing
program.
The 1997-98 Budget Act anticipated General Fund revenues and transfers of
$52.5 billion (a 6.8% increase over the final 1996-97 amount), and expenditures
of $52.8 billion (an 8.0% increase from the 1996-97 levels). On a budgetary
basis, the SFEU was projected to decrease from $408 million at June 30, 1997 to
$112 million at June 30, 1998. As of January 9, 1998, the State Director of
Finance estimated a reserve of $329 million at June 30, 1998. (The expenditure
figure assumes restoration of $200 million in vetoed funding.) The Budget Act
also included Special Fund expenditures of $14.4 billion (as against estimated
Special Fund revenues of $14.0 billion), and $2.1 billion of expenditures from
various Bond Funds. The State implemented its normal annual cash flow borrowing
program, issuing $3 billion of notes which matured on June 30, 1998.
52
<PAGE> 54
The following were major features of the 1997-98 Budget Act:
1. The 1997-98 Budget contained a large increase in funding for K-14
education under Proposition 98, reflecting strong revenues which exceeded
initial budgeted amounts. Part of the nearly $1.75 billion in increased
spending was allocated to prior fiscal years. Funds were provided to fully
pay for the cost-of-living increase component of Proposition 98, and to
extend class size reduction and reading initiatives.
2. The 1997-98 Budget Act reflected the $1.235 billion pension case
judgment payment, and brought funding of the State's pension contribution
back to the quarterly basis which existed prior to the deferral actions
which were invalidated by the courts. There was no provision for any
additional payments relating to this court case.
3. Continuing the third year of a four-year "compact" which the
Administration made with higher education units, funding from the General
Fund for the University of California and California State University has
increased by about six percent ($121 million and $107 million,
respectively), and there was no increase in student fees.
4. Because of the effect of the pension payment, most other State
programs were continued at 1996-97 levels.
5. Health and welfare costs were contained, continuing generally the
grant levels from prior years, as part of the initial implementation of the
new CalWORKs program.
6. Unlike prior years, the 1997-98 Budget Act did not depend on
federal budget actions. About $300 million in federal funds, already
included in the federal FY 1997 and 1998 budgets, were included in the
1997-98 Budget Act, to offset incarceration costs for illegal aliens.
7. The 1997-98 Budget Act contained no tax increases, and no tax
reductions. The Renters Tax Credit was suspended for another year, saving
approximately $500 million.
Pursuant to Article IV, Section 13(c) of the Constitution of the State of
California, the State Legislature is required to adopt its budget for the
upcoming fiscal year (July 1-June 30) by midnight of June 15th, and in the
absence of which, the Legislature may not send to the Governor for consideration
any bill appropriating funds for expenditure during the fiscal year for which
the budget bill is to be enacted, except emergency bills or appropriations for
the salaries and expenses of the Legislature. For the current fiscal year, as
has been true since the late 1980's, the State Legislature did not adhere to
this deadline. Due to the Legislature's failure to comply with this
constitutional requirement, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association sought an
injunction in a Los Angeles Superior Court to prohibit the State from making
certain types of payments in the absence of an adopted budget. On July 21, 1998,
a preliminary injunction was issued. Under the terms of the injunction order,
until such time as the budget was adopted, the State was precluded from making
any payments from the State treasury for Fiscal Year 1998-99 except for certain
enumerated expenditures.
On July 22, 1998, the Legislature unanimously passed an $18.9 billion
emergency-spending bill to cover the costs of, among others, bond payments,
paychecks for state workers, retirement pensions, prisons, school and welfare
payments from July 1st through August 5th. However, before a final resolution of
the
53
<PAGE> 55
legal issues raised by the plaintiff, a budget for Fiscal Year 1998-99 was
passed by the Legislature on August 11, 1998, and the Governor signed it on
August 21, 1998.
In signing the 1998-99 Budget Bill, the Governor used his line-item veto
power to reduce expenditures by $1.360 billion from the General Fund, and $160
million from Special Funds. Of this total, the Governor indicated that about
$250 million of vetoed funds were "set aside" to fund programs for education.
Vetoed items included education funds, salary increases and many individual
resources and capital projects.
The 1998-99 Budget Act is based on projected general fund revenues and
transfers of $57.0 billion (after giving effect to various tax reductions
enacted in 1997 and 1998), a 4.2% increase from the revised 1997-98 figures.
Special Fund revenues were estimated at $14.3 billion. The revenue projections
were based on the May Revision. Economic problems overseas since that time may
affect the May Revision projections.
After giving effect to the Governor's vetoes, the 1998-99 Budget Act
provides authority for expenditures of $57.3 billion from the General Fund (a
7.3% increase from 1997-98), $14.7 billion from Special Funds, and $3.4 billion
from bond funds. The 1998-99 Budget Act projects a balance in the SFEU at June
30, 1999 (but without including the "set aside" veto amount) of $1.255 billion,
a little more than 2% of general fund revenues. The Budget Act assumes the State
will carry out its normal intra-year cash flow borrowing in the amount of $1.7
billion of revenue anticipation notes, which were issued on October 1, 1998.
The most significant feature of the 1998-99 Budget was agreement on a total
of $1.4 billion of tax cuts. The central element is a bill which provides for a
phased-in reduction of the VLF. Since the VLF is currently transferred to cities
and counties, the bill provides for the general fund to replace the lost
revenues. Starting on January 1, 1999, the VLF will be reduced by 25%, at a cost
to the general fund of approximately $500 million in the 1998-99 Fiscal Year and
about $1 billion annually thereafter.
In addition to the cut in VLF, the 1998-99 Budget includes both temporary
and permanent increases in the personal income tax dependent credit ($612
million General Fund cost in 1998-99, but less in future years), a nonrefundable
renters tax credit ($133 million), and various targeted business tax credits
($106 million).
Other significant elements of the 1998-99 Budget Act are as follows:
1. Proposition 98 funding for K-12 schools is increased by $1.7
billion in General Fund moneys over revised 1997-98 levels, about $300
million higher than the minimum Proposition 98 guaranty. An additional $600
million was appropriated to "settle up" prior years' Proposition 98
entitlements, and was primarily devoted to one-time uses such as block
grants, deferred maintenance, and computer and laboratory equipment. Of the
1998-99 funds, major new programs include money for instructional and
library materials, deferred maintenance, support for increasing the school
year to 180 days and reduction of class sizes in Grade 9. The Governor held
$250 million of education funds which were vetoed as set-aside for
enactment of additional reforms. Overall, per-pupil spending for K-12
schools under Proposition 98 is increased to $5,695, more than one-third
higher than the level in the last recession year of 1993-94. The 1998-99
Budget also includes $250 million as repayment of prior years' loans to
schools, as part of the settlement of the CTA v. Gould lawsuit.
54
<PAGE> 56
2. Funding for higher education increased substantially above the
level called for in the Governor's four-year compact. General Fund support
was increased by $340 million (15.6%) for the University of California and
$267 million (14.1%) for the California State University system. In
addition, Community Colleges received a $300 million (6.6%) increase under
Proposition 98.
3. The 1998-99 Budget includes increased funding for health, welfare
and social services programs. A 4.9% grant increase was included in the
basic welfare grants, the first increase in those grants in 9 years. Future
increases will depend on sufficient general fund revenue to trigger the
phased cuts in VLF described above.
4. Funding for the judiciary and criminal justice programs increased
by about 11% over 1997-98, primarily to reflect increased State support for
local trial courts and rising prison population.
5. Various other highlights of the 1998-99 Budget included new
funding for resources projects, dedication of $376 million of general fund
moneys for capital outlay projects, funding of a three percent State
employee salary increase, funding of 2,000 new Department of Transportation
positions to accelerate transportation construction projects, and funding
of the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank ($50 million).
6. The State of California received approximately $167 million of
federal reimbursements to offset costs related to the incarceration of
undocumented alien felons for federal fiscal year 1997. The State
anticipates receiving approximately $195 million in federal reimbursements
for federal fiscal year 1998.
After the 1998-99 Budget Act was signed, and prior to the close of the
Legislative session on August 31, 1998, the Legislature passed a variety of
fiscal bills. The Governor had until September 30, 1998 to sign or veto these
bills. The bills with the most significant fiscal impact which the Governor
signed include $235 million for certain water system improvements in Southern
California, $243 million for the State's share of the purchase of
environmentally sensitive forest lands, $178 million for state prisons, $160
million for housing assistance, and $125 million for juvenile facilities. The
Governor also signed bills totaling $223 million for education programs which
were part of the Governor's $250 million veto "set aside," and $32 million for
local governments' fiscal relief. In addition, he signed a bill reducing by $577
million the State's obligation to contribute to the State Teachers' Retirement
System in the 1998-99 Fiscal Year.
Based solely on the legislation enacted, on a net basis, the reserve for
June 30, 1999 was reduced by $256 million. On the other hand, 1997-98 revenues
have been increased by $160 million. The revised June 30, 1999 reserve is
projected to be $1,159 million or $96 million below the level originally
projected by the 1998-99 Budget Act. The reserve projected in the 1998-99 Budget
Act was $1,255 million.
Subsequent Events. In November 1998, the State Legislative Analysts Office
(the "LAO") issued a report that projected both a decrease in revenues and an
increase in expenditures from the assumptions on which the 1998-99 Fiscal Year
Budget is based, reducing the estimated year-end reserves to $331 million. The
LAO further estimated a budget shortfall of $1 billion in Fiscal Year 1999-2000
absent corrective actions.
On January 8, 1999, newly-elected Governor Davis released his proposed
budget for the 1999-2000 Fiscal Year, which was revised as of May 14, 1999 (the
"Proposed Budget"). The Proposed Budget
55
<PAGE> 57
estimates general fund revenues and transfers in 1999-2000 of $63 billion, an
8.7% increase from revised 1998-99 figures. The Governor proposes expenditures
of $63.2 billion, a 7.8% increase from 1998-99. The Proposed Budget projects a
balance in the SFEU of $1.8 billion at June 30, 1999 and $985 million at June
30, 2000.
A summary of the Proposed Budget is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY AGENCY
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
1999-00
-------
Legislative, Judicial, Executive............................ $ 2,176
State and Consumer Services................................. 454
Business, Transportation & Housing.......................... 441
Trade and Commerce.......................................... 479
Resources................................................... 1,186
Environmental Protection.................................... 156
Health and Human Services................................... 16,710
Youth and Adult Correctional................................ 5,088
K-12 Education.............................................. 26,462
Higher Education............................................ 7,877
General Government.......................................... 2,194
-------
TOTAL....................................................... $63,223
</TABLE>
On May 17, 1999, the Legislative Analyst released an updated report (the
"LAO Report") on the 1999-00 Governor's Budget which concludes that for the
fourth year in a row, California's budget outlook shows a major improvement in
the May revision. The LAO's report determines that the revenue outlook is
decidedly stronger because of (1) a brighter near-term economic outlook than
previously assumed and (2) higher-than-expected personal income tax receipts,
especially during the last month. However, a significant portion of the new
revenues will be necessary to cover cost increases in Proposition 98 education
and other state programs. Even after accounting for these new obligations,
however, the Governor and Legislature will have discretion over a substantial
amount of additional resources as they finalize the budget plan for 1999-00.
The original budget's economic forecast was prepared in late 1998 when it
appeared that the Asian economic crisis was resulting in a significant slowdown
in economic activity. However, according to the LAO Report, since that time, the
economic picture has brightened considerably, as both the nation and California
appear to have avoided a major slowdown emanating from Asia's problems. Based on
continued growth in real gross domestic product (GDP), strong consumer
confidence, and other factors, the consensus economic outlook for 1999 now calls
for real GDP growth of over 3.5%, or nearly double the projection contained in
the January budget forecast. In California, employment data revisions reveal
that instead of slowing in late 1998 and early 1999, as assumed in the January
budget estimate, wage and salary jobs in the state continued to expand at a
healthy pace. This more positive trend is expected to continue through 1999.
56
<PAGE> 58
WELFARE REFORM
Congress passed and the President signed on August 22, 1996 the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (the "Law")
fundamentally reforming the nation's welfare system. Among its many provisions,
the Law includes: (i) conversion to Aid to Families with Dependent Children from
an entitlement program to a block grant titled Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF), with lifetime time limits on TANF recipients, work requirements
and other changes; (ii) provisions denying certain federal welfare and public
benefits to legal noncitizens (this provision has been amended by subsequent
federal law), allowing states to elect to deny additional benefits (including
TANF) to legal noncitizens, and generally denying almost all benefits to illegal
immigrants; and (iii) changes in the Food Stamp program, including reducing
maximum benefits and imposing work requirements.
California's response to the federal welfare reforms is a new basic state
welfare program called California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids
("CalWORKs"), which replaced the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children
(AFDC) and Greater Avenues to Independence (GAIN) programs, effective January 1,
1998. Consistent with the federal law, CalWORKs contains new time limits on
receipt of welfare aid, both lifetime as well as for any current period on aid.
The centerpiece of CalWORKs is the linkage of eligibility to work participation
requirements. Administration of the new CalWORKs program is largely at the
county level, and counties are given financial incentives for success in this
program.
The long-term impact of the new federal Law and CalWORKs cannot be
determined until there has been more experience and until an independent
evaluation of the CalWORKs program is completed. In the short-term, the
implementation of the CalWORKS program has continued the trend of declining
welfare caseloads. The CalWORKs caseload trend is projected to be 651,350 in
1998-99 and 598,000 in 1999-00, down from a high of 921,000 cases in 1994-95.
The 1999-00 Governor's Budget limits CalWORKs expenditures to the annual
$3.7 billion federal TANF Block Grant and prior year carryover amounts, and the
state General Fund and county General Fund combined Maintenance of Effort
Requirement of $2.9 billion. Any decision to maintain or exceed the Maintenance
of Effort Requirement would need to be made in the context of available
resources and competing budget demands.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
The primary units of local government in California are the counties,
ranging in population from 1,300 (Alpine) to over 9,000,000 (Los Angeles).
Counties are responsible for the provision of many basic services, including
indigent healthcare, welfare, courts, jails and public safety in unincorporated
areas. There are also about 480 incorporated cities and thousands of other
special districts formed for education, utility and other services. The fiscal
condition of local governments has been constrained since the enactment of
"Proposition 13" in 1978, which reduced and limited the future growth of
property taxes and limited the ability of local governments to impose "special
taxes" (those devoted to a specific purpose) without two-thirds voter approval.
Counties, in particular, have had fewer options to raise revenues than many
other local governmental entities, and have been required to maintain many
services.
The entire statewide welfare system has been changed in response to the
change in federal welfare law enacted in 1996 (see "Federal Welfare Reform"
above). Under the CalWORKs program, counties are given flexibility to develop
their own plans, consistent with State law, to implement Welfare-to-Work and
57
<PAGE> 59
to administer many of its elements and their costs for administrative and
support services are capped at 1996-97 levels. Counties are also given financial
incentives if, at the individual county level or statewide, the CalWORKs program
produces savings associated with specified Welfare-to-Work outcomes; counties
may also suffer penalties for failing to meet federal standards. Under CalWORKs,
counties will still be required to provide "general assistance" aid to certain
persons who cannot obtain welfare from other programs.
Historically, funding for the State's trial court system was divided
between the State and the counties. However, Chapter 850, Statutes of 1997,
implements a restructuring of the State's trial court funding system. Funding
for the courts, with the exception of costs for facilities, local judicial
benefits, and revenue collection, was consolidated at the State level. County
contribution for both their general fund and fine and penalty amounts is capped
at the 1994-95 level and becomes part of the Trial Court Trust Fund, which
supports all trial court operations. The State assumed responsibility for future
growth in trial court funding. The consolidation of funding is intended to
streamline the operation of the courts, provide a dedicated revenue source, and
relieve fiscal pressure on the counties. Beginning in 1998-99, county general
fund contribution for court operations is reduced by $300 million, including
$10.7 million to buy out the contribution of the 20 smallest counties, and
cities will retain $62 million in fine and penalty revenue previously remitted
to the State; the State's general fund backfilled the $362 million revenue loss
to the Trial Court Trust Fund. In addition to this general fund backfill, a $50
million augmentation is included in the 1998 Budget Act for the trial courts to
fund workload increases and high priority issues such as court security. In
1999-2000, county general fund contributions will be further reduced by an
additional $92 million to buy out the next 17 smallest counties and reduce by
ten percent the general fund contribution of the remaining 21 counties.
In the aftermath of Proposition 13, the State provided aid from the general
fund to make up some of the loss of property tax moneys, including taking over
the principal responsibility for funding local K-12 schools and community
colleges. Under the pressure of the recent recession, the Legislature has
eliminated remnants of this post-Proposition 13 aid to entities other than K-14
education districts, although it has also provided additional funding sources
(such as sales taxes) and reduced mandates for local services. Many counties
continue to be under severe fiscal stress. While such stress has in recent years
most often been experienced by smaller, rural counties, larger urban counties,
such as Los Angeles, have also been affected. Orange County implemented
significant reductions in services and personnel, and continues to face fiscal
constraints in the aftermath of its bankruptcy, which has been caused by large
investment losses in its pooled investment funds.
On November 5, 1996, voters approved Proposition 218, entitled the "Right
to Vote on Taxes Act," which incorporates new Articles XIIIC and XIIID into the
California Constitution. These new provisions enact limitations on the ability
of local government agencies to impose or raise various taxes, fees, charges and
assessments without voter approval. Certain "general taxes" imposed after
January 1, 1995 must be approved by voters in order to remain in effect. In
addition, Article XIIIC clarifies the right of local voters to reduce taxes,
fees, and assessments to changes through local initiatives. There are a number
of ambiguities concerning the Proposition and its impact on local governments
and their bonded debt which will require interpretation by the courts or the
State Legislature. The State Legislature Analyst estimated that enactment of
Proposition 218 would reduce local government revenues statewide by over $100
million
58
<PAGE> 60
a year, and that over time revenues to local government would be reduced by
several hundred million dollars. Proposition 218 does not affect the State or
its ability to levy or collect taxes.
On December 23, 1997, a consortium of California counties filed a test
claim with the Commission on State Mandates (the "Commission") asking the
Commission to determine whether the property tax shift from counties to the
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, which is a funding source for schools, is
a reimbursable state mandated cost. The test claim was heard on October 29,
1998, and the Commission on State Mandates found in favor the State. However,
the case is now expected to be appealed through the court system. Should the
courts find in favor of the counties, the impact to the State General Fund could
be as high as $10.0 billion with an annual Proposition 98 General Fund cost of
at least $3.6 billion. This cost would grow in accordance with the annual
assessed value growth rate.
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS; RECENT AND PENDING INITIATIVES;
PENDING LEGISLATION
Constitutional and Statutory Limitations. Article XIIIA of the California
Constitution (which resulted from the voter-approved Proposition 13 in 1978)
limits the taxing powers of California public agencies, Article XIIIA, provides
that the maximum ad valorem tax on real property cannot exceed 1% of the "full
cash value" of the property and effectively prohibits the levying of any other
ad valorem tax on real property for general purposes. However, on May 3, 1986,
Proposition 46, an amendment to Article XIIIA, was approved by the voters of the
State of California, creating a new exemption under Article XIIIA permitting an
increase in ad valorem taxes on real property in excess of 1% for bonded
indebtedness approved by two-thirds of the voters voting on the proposed
indebtedness, "Full cash value" is defined as "the County Assessor's valuation
of real property as shown on the 1975-76 Fiscal Year tax bill under "full cash
value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased,
newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975
assessment." The "full cash value" is subject to annual adjustment to reflect
increases (not to exceed 2%) or decreases in the consumer price index or
comparable local data, or to reflect reductions in property value caused by
damage, destruction or other factors.
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution limits the amount of
appropriations of the State and of the local governments to the amount of
appropriations of the entity for the prior year, adjusted for changes in the
cost of living, population and the services that local government has financial
responsibility for providing. To the extent that the revenues of the State
and/or local government exceed its appropriations, the excess revenues must be
rebated to the public either directly or through a tax decrease. Expenditures
for voter-approved debt services are not included in the appropriations limit.
At the November 9, 1988 general election, California voters approved an
initiative known as Proposition 98. This initiative amends Article XIIIB to
require that (i) the California Legislature establish a prudent state reserve
fund in an amount it shall deem reasonable and necessary and (ii) revenues in
excess of amounts permitted to be spent and which would otherwise be returned
pursuant to Article XIIIB by revision of tax rates or fee schedules be
transferred and allocated (up to a maximum of 40%) to the State School Fund and
be expended solely for purposes of instructional improvement and accountability.
Proposition 98 also amends Article XVI to require that the State of California
provide a minimum level of funding for public schools and community colleges.
Commencing with the 1988-89 Fiscal Year, money to be applied by the State for
the support of school districts and community college districts shall not be
less than the greater of: (i) the amount which, as a percentage of the State
general fund revenues which may
59
<PAGE> 61
be appropriated pursuant to Article XIIIB, equals the percentage of such State
general fund revenues appropriated for school districts and community college
districts, respectively, in the 1986-87 Fiscal Year or (ii) the amount required
to insure that the total allocations to school districts and community college
districts from the State general fund proceeds of taxes appropriated pursuant to
Article XIIIB and allocated local proceeds of taxes shall not be less than the
total amount from these sources in the prior year, adjusted for increases in
enrollment and adjusted for changes in the cost of living pursuant to the
provisions of Article XIIIB. The initiative permits the enactment of
legislation, by a two-thirds vote, to suspend the minimum funding requirements
for one year. As a result of Proposition 98, funds that the State might
otherwise make available to its political subdivisions may be allocated instead
to satisfy such minimum funding level.
During the recent recession, general fund revenues for several years were
less than originally projected, so that the original Proposition 98
appropriations turned out to be higher than the minimum percentage provided in
the law. The Legislature responded to these developments by designating the
"extra" Proposition 98 payments in one year as a "loan" from future years'
Proposition 98 entitlements and also intended that the "extra" payments would
not be included in the Proposition 98 "base" for calculating future years'
entitlements. By implementing these actions, per-pupil funding from Proposition
98 sources stayed almost constant at approximately $4,220 from the 1991-92
Fiscal Year to the 1993-94 Fiscal Year.
In 1992, a lawsuit was filed, called California Teachers' Association v.
Gould, which challenged the validity of these off-budget loans. The settlement
of this case, finalized in July, 1996, provides, among other things, that both
the State and K-14 schools share in the repayment of prior years' emergency
loans to schools. Of the total $1.76 billion in loans, the State will repay $935
million by forgiveness of the amount owed, while schools will repay $825
million. The State share of the repayment will be reflected as an appropriation
above the current Proposition 98 base calculation. The schools' share of the
repayment will count either as appropriations that count toward satisfying the
Proposition 98 guarantee, or as appropriations from "below" the current base.
Repayments are spread over the eight-year period of the 1994-95 Fiscal Year
through the 2001-02 Fiscal Year to mitigate any adverse fiscal impact.
Substantially increased general fund revenues, above initial budget
projections, in the 1994-95, 1995-96 and 1996-97 fiscal years have resulted or
will result in retroactive increases in Proposition 98 appropriations from
subsequent fiscal years' budgets.
On November 8, 1994, the voters approved Proposition 187, an initiative
statute ("Proposition 187"). Proposition 187 specifically prohibits funding by
the State of social services, health care services and public school education
for the benefit of any person not verified as either a United States citizen or
a person legally admitted to the United States. Among the provisions in
Proposition 187 pertaining to public school education, the measure requires,
commencing January 1, 1995, that every school district in the State verify the
legal status of every child enrolling in the district for the first time. By
January 1, 1996, each school district must also verify the legal status of
children already enrolled in the district and of all parents or guardians of all
students. If the district "reasonably suspects" that a student, parent or
guardian is not legally in the United States, that district must report the
student to the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service and certain
other parties. The measure also prohibits a school district from providing
education to a student it does not verify as either a United States citizen or a
person legally admitted to the United States. The State Legislative Analyst
estimates that verification costs could be in
60
<PAGE> 62
the tens of millions of dollars on a statewide level (including verification
costs incurred by other local governments), with first-year costs potentially in
excess of $100 million.
The reporting requirements may violate the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act ("FERPA"), which generally prohibits schools that receive federal
funds from disclosing information in student records without parental consent.
Compliance with FERPA is a condition of receiving federal education funds, which
total $2.3 billion annually to California school districts. The Secretary of the
United States Department of Education has indicated that the reporting
requirements in Proposition 187 could jeopardize the ability of school districts
to receive these funds.
Opponents of Proposition 187 filed at least eight lawsuits (which were
subsequently consolidated) challenging the constitutionality and validity of the
measure. On March 18, 1998, a United States District Court judge entered as
final judgment in the case, holding key portions of the measure unconstitutional
and permanently enjoining the State from implementing those sections which would
have required law enforcement, teachers and social services and health care
workers to verify a person's immigration status and subsequently report illegal
immigrants to authorities and deny them social services, health care and
education benefits. An appeal by the State Attorney General was filed with the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on March 25, 1998 and is pending.
Pending Litigation. The State is a party to numerous legal proceedings,
many of which normally occur in governmental operations. Some of the more
significant lawsuits pending against the State are described herein.
The State is involved in a lawsuit, Thomas Hayes v. Commission on State
Mandates, related to the state-mandated costs. The action involves an appeal by
the Director of Finance from a 1984 decision by the State Board of Control (now
succeeded by the Commission on State Mandates). The Board of Control decided in
favor of local school districts' claims for reimbursement for special education
programs for handicapped students. The case was then brought to the trial court
by the State and later remanded to the Commission on State Mandates for
redetermination. The Commission on State Mandates issued a decision in December
1998 determining that a portion, but not all, of the claims constituted state
mandated local costs. The Commission is now developing parameters and guidelines
for claims for reimbursement. The Department of Finance has not yet determined
whether to seek judicial review of the Commission's decision.
The State is involved in a lawsuit related to contamination at the
Stringfellow toxic waste site. In United States, People of the State of
California v. J. B. Stringfellow, Jr., et. al., the State is seeking recovery
for post costs of cleanup of the site, a declaration that the defendants are
jointly and severally liable for future costs, and an injunction ordering
completion of the cleanup. However, the defendants have filed a counterclaim
against the State for alleged negligent acts. Because the State is the present
owner of the site, the State may be found liable. Present estimates of the
cleanup range from $300 million to $800 million.
The State is a defendant in a coordinated action involving 3,000 plaintiffs
seeking recovery for damages caused by the Yuba River flood of February 1986.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court finding of liability in inverse
condemnation and awarded damages of $500,000 to 12 sample plaintiffs. Potential
liability to the remaining 300 plaintiffs, from claims filed, ranges from $800
million to $1.5 billion. An appeal has been filed.
61
<PAGE> 63
The State is a defendant in Just Say No To Tobacco Dough Campaign v. State
of California, where the petitioners challenge the appropriation of
approximately $166 million of Proposition 99 funds in the Cigarette and Tobacco
Products Surtax Fund for years ended June 30, 1990, through June 30, 1995 for
programs which were allegedly not health education or tobacco-related disease
research. The superior court issued an order in December 1998, granting the
State's demurrer to the entire action and dismissing the case. Plaintiffs have
asked the court to reconsider its ruling.
In Capitola Land v. Anderson and other related state and federal cases,
plaintiffs sought payments from the State under the AFDC-Foster Care program.
Judgment was rendered against the State in Capitola, which the State appealed
and lost. The State then filed a state plan amendment with the federal
Department of Health and Human Services to enable the State to comply with the
Capitola ruling and receive federal funding. The DHHS denied the state plan
amendment, and the State has filed suit against DHHS. The Legislature also
enacted a statute which required federal funding in order to comply with the
Capitola judgment. The State then refused to implement the Capitola judgment
based on the new statute. Certain plaintiffs moved for an order of contempt
against the State, which was granted by the trial court, but was stayed and
annulled by the Court of Appeal. The plaintiffs are petitioning the California
Supreme Court for review. If, as a result of this litigation, compliance with
the Capitola judgment is required and the judgment is applied retroactively,
liability to the State could exceed $200 million.
In late 1998, the State signed a settlement agreement with the four major
cigarette manufacturers, which was later ratified by a State court judge having
jurisdiction over a pending lawsuit brought by the State against these
companies. Under the settlement, the companies will pay California governments a
total of approximately $25 billion over a period of 25 years, starting with some
payments in the spring of 1999. Under the State's settlement, half of these
moneys will be paid to the State, and half to local governments (cities and
counties). The specific amount to be received by the State and local governments
is, however, subject to adjustment for a number of reasons. First, the federal
government has indicated that it may seek recovery of part of the State's
settlement as reimbursement for federal Medicaid funding in prior years. The
State expects to resist such a claim, which may ultimately be resolved by
Congress. Second, various details in the settlement allow reduction of the
companies' payments because of events such as certain federal government
actions, reductions in cigarette sales, or bankruptcy of any settling companies.
On June 24, 1998, plaintiffs in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al.
v. Kathleen Connell filed a complaint for certain declaratory and injunctive
relief challenging the authority of the State Controller to make payments from
the State Treasury in the absence of a state budget. On July 21, 1998, the trial
court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the State Controller from
paying moneys from the State Treasury for fiscal year 1998-99, with certain
limited exceptions, in the absence of a state budget. The preliminary
injunction, among other things, prohibited the State Controller from making any
payments pursuant to any continuing appropriation.
On July 22 and 27, 1998, various employee unions which had intervened in
the case appealed the trial court's preliminary injunction and asked the Court
of Appeal to stay the preliminary injunction. On July 28, 1998, the Court of
Appeal granted the unions' requests and stayed the preliminary injunction
pending the Court of Appeal's decision on the merits of the appeal. On August 5,
1998, the Court of Appeal denied the plaintiffs' request to reconsider the stay.
Also on July 22, 1998, the State Controller asked the California Supreme Court
to immediately stay the trial court's preliminary injunction and to
62
<PAGE> 64
overrule the order granting the preliminary injunction on the merits. On July
29, 1998, the Supreme Court transferred the State Controller's request to the
Court of Appeal. The matters are now pending before the Court of Appeal.
In Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, plaintiff challenged the
validity and constitutionality of the State's smog impact fee and requested a
refund of the fee. In October 1997, the trial court ruled in favor of the
plaintiff and, in addition, ordered the State to provide refunds to all persons
who paid the smog impact fee from the years before the filing of the lawsuit in
1995 to the present. The Plaintiff asserts that the total amount required to be
refunded will exceed $350 million. The State has appealed.
A judgment was entered for the plaintiff in August 1998 in the case of
Ceridian Corporation v. Franchise Tax Board, a suit which challenged the
validity of two sections of the California Tax laws. The first related to
deduction from corporate taxes for dividends received from insurance companies
to the extent the insurance companies have California activities. The second
related to corporate deduction of dividends to the extent the earnings of the
dividend-paying corporation have already been included in the measure of their
California tax. If both sections of the California Tax law are ultimately
invalidated, and all dividends become deductible, then the General Fund can
become liable for approximately $200 to $250 million annually. The State has
appealed the decision.
63
<PAGE> 65
APPENDIX II
RATINGS OF MUNICIPAL BONDS
DESCRIPTION OF MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC.'S ("MOODY'S") MUNICIPAL BOND
RATINGS
Aaa Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality.
They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are
generally referred to as "gilt edge." Interest payments are
protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and
principal is secure. While the various protective elements are
likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most
unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such
issues.
Aa Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all
standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are
generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than
the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large
as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be
of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which
make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa
securities.
A Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment
attributes and are to be considered as upper medium grade
obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest
are considered adequate, but elements may be present which
suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future.
Baa Bonds which are rated Baa are considered as medium grade
obligations, i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly
secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate
for the present, but certain protective elements may be lacking
or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of
time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and
in fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Ba Bonds which are rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements;
their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the
protection of interest and principal payments may be very
moderate and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and
bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes
bonds in this class.
B Bonds which are rated B generally lack characteristics of the
desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal
payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over
any long period of time may be small.
Caa Bonds which are rated Caa are of poor standing. Such issues may
be in default or there may be present elements of danger with
respect to principal or interest.
Ca Bonds which are rated Ca represent obligations which are
speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or
have other marked shortcomings.
64
<PAGE> 66
C Bonds which are rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and
issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor
prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing.
Note: Those bonds in the Aa, A, Baa, Ba and B groups which Moody's
believes possess the strongest investment attributes are designated by the
symbols Aa1, A1, Baa1, Ba1 and B1.
Short-term Notes: The three ratings of Moody's for short-term notes are
MIG 1/VMIG 1, MIG 2/VMIG 2, and MIG 3/VMIG 3; MIG 1/VMIG 1 denotes "best
quality, enjoying strong protection from established cash flows"; MIG 2/VMIG 2
denotes "high quality" with "ample margins of protection"; MIG 3/VMIG 3
instruments are of "favorable quality . . . but . . . lacking the undeniable
strength of the preceding grades".
DESCRIPTION OF MOODY'S COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS
Moody's Commercial Paper ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to
repay punctually promissory obligations not having an original maturity in
excess of nine months. Moody's employs the following three designations, all
judged to be investment grade, to indicate the relative repayment capacity of
rated issuers:
Issuers rated Prime-1 (or supporting institutions) have a superior ability
for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. Prime-1 repayment ability
will often be evidenced by many of the following characteristics: leading market
positions in well established industries; high rates of return on funds
employed; conservative capitalization structures with moderate reliance on debt
and ample asset protection; broad margins in earning coverage of fixed financial
charges and high internal cash generation; and well established access to a
range of financial markets and assured sources of alternate liquidity.
Issuers rated Prime-2 (or supporting institutions) have a strong ability
for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. This will normally be
evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above but to a lesser degree.
Earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, may be more subject to
variation. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more
affected by external conditions. Ample alternate liquidity is maintained.
Issuers rated Prime-3 (or supporting institutions) have an acceptable
ability for repayment of short-term promissory obligations. The effects of
industry characteristics and market composition may be more pronounced.
Variability in earnings and profitability may result in changes to the level of
debt protection measurements and may require relatively high financial leverage.
Adequate alternate liquidity is maintained.
Issuers rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating
categories.
DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD & POOR'S, A DIVISION OF THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.
("STANDARD & POOR'S"), MUNICIPAL DEBT RATINGS
A Standard & Poor's municipal debt rating is a current opinion of the
creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation,
a specific class of financial obligations or a specific program. It takes into
consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or other forms of
credit enhancement on the obligation.
65
<PAGE> 67
The debt rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold a
financial obligation, inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price or
suitability for a particular investor.
The ratings are based on current information furnished by the obligors or
obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources Standard & Poor's considers
reliable. Standard & Poor's does not perform an audit in connection with any
rating and may, on occasion, rely on unaudited financial information. The
ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or
unavailability of, such information, or based on circumstances.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations:
I. Likelihood of payment -- capacity and willingness of the obligor
as to the timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in
accordance with the terms of the obligation;
II. Nature of and provisions of the obligation;
III. Protection afforded to, and relative position of, the obligation
in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization or other arrangement under the
laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors' rights.
AAA Debt rated "AAA" has the highest rating assigned by Standard &
Poor's. Capacity to meet its financial commitment on the
obligation is extremely strong.
AA Debt rated "AA" differs from the highest rated issues only in
small degree. The Obligor's capacity to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation is very strong.
A Debt rated "A" is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse
effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than
debt in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor's capacity
to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still
strong.
BBB Debt rated "BBB" exhibits adequate protection parameters.
However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances
are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to
meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
BB
B
CCC
CC
C Debt rated "BB," "B," "CCC," "CC" and "C" are regarded as having
significant speculative characteristics. "BB" indicates the least
degree of speculation and "C" the highest degree of speculation.
While such debt will likely have some quality and protective
characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties
or major risk exposures to adverse conditions.
D Debt rated "D" is in payment default. The "D" rating category is
used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due
even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless
Standard & Poor's believes that such payments will be made during
such grace period. The "D" rating also will be used upon the
filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action
if payments on an obligation are jeopardized.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): The ratings from "AA" to "CCC" may be modified by
the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major
rating categories.
66
<PAGE> 68
DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD & POOR'S COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS
A Standard & Poor's commercial paper rating is a current assessment of the
likelihood of timely payment of debt having an original maturity of no more than
365 days. Ratings are graded into several categories, ranging from "A-1" for the
highest-quality obligations to "D" for the lowest. These categories are as
follows:
A-1 This designation indicates that the degree of safety regarding
timely payment is strong. Those issues determined to possess
extremely strong safety characteristics are denoted with a plus
sign (+) designation.
A-2 Capacity for timely payment on issues with this designation is
satisfactory. However, the relative degree of safety is not as
high as for issues designated "A-1."
A-3 Issues carrying this designation have an adequate capacity for
timely payment. They are, however, more vulnerable to the adverse
effects of changes in circumstances than obligations carrying the
higher designations.
B Issues rated "B" are regarded as having only speculative capacity
for timely payment.
C This rating is assigned to short-term debt obligations with a
doubtful capacity for payment.
D Debt rated "D" is in payment default. The "D" rating category is
used when interest payments or principal payments are not made on
the date due, even if the applicable grace period has not expired
unless Standard & Poor's believes that such payments will be made
during such grace period.
A commercial paper rating is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a
security. The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard &
Poor's by the issuer or obtained by Standard & Poor's from other sources it
considers reliable. The ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a
result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information.
A Standard & Poor's note rating reflects the liquidity factors and market
access risks unique to notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely
receive a note rating. Notes maturing beyond three years will most likely
receive a long-term debt rating. The following criteria will be used in making
that assessment.
-- Amortization schedule -- the larger the final maturity relative to other
maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note.
-- Source of payment -- the more dependent the issue is on the market for
its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note.
Note rating symbols are as follows:
SP-1 Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue
determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service
is given a plus (+) designation.
SP-2 Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest with some
vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the
term of the notes.
SP-3 Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.
67
<PAGE> 69
DESCRIPTION OF FITCH IBCA, INC.'S ("FITCH") INVESTMENT GRADE BOND RATINGS
Fitch investment grade bond ratings provide a guide to investors in
determining the credit risk associated with a particular security. The rating
represents Fitch's assessment of the issuer's ability to meet the obligations of
a specific debt issue or class of debt in a timely manner.
The rating takes into consideration special features of the issue, its
relationship to other obligations of the issuer, the current and prospective
financial condition and operating performance of the issuer and any guarantor,
as well as the economic and political environment that might affect the issuer's
future financial strength and credit quality.
Fitch ratings do not reflect any credit enhancement that may be provided by
insurance policies or financial guarantees unless otherwise indicated.
Bonds carrying the same rating are of similar but not necessarily identical
credit quality since the rating categories do not fully reflect small
differences in the degrees of credit risk.
Fitch ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.
Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any
security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of
payments made in respect of any security.
Fitch ratings are based on information obtained from issuers, other
obligors, underwriters, their experts, and other sources Fitch believes to be
reliable. Fitch does not audit or verify the truth or accuracy of such
information. Ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of
changes in, or the unavailability of, information or for other reasons.
AAA Bonds considered to be investment grade and of the highest credit
quality. The obligor has an exceptionally strong ability to pay
interest and repay principal, which is unlikely to be affected by
reasonably foreseeable events.
AA Bonds considered to be investment grade and of very high credit
quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay
principal is very strong, although not quite as strong as bonds
rated "AAA." Because bonds rated in the "AAA" and "AA" categories
are not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable future
developments, short-term debt of these issuers is generally rated
"F-1+."
A Bonds considered to be investment grade and of high credit
quality. The obligor's ability to pay interest and repay
principal is considered to be strong, but may be more vulnerable
to adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances than
bonds with higher ratings.
BBB Bonds considered to be investment grade and of
satisfactory-credit quality. The obligor's ability to pay
interest and repay principal is considered to be adequate.
Adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances,
however, are more likely to have adverse impact on these bonds,
and therefore impair timely payment. The likelihood that the
ratings of these bonds will fall below investment grade is higher
than for bonds with higher ratings.
68
<PAGE> 70
Plus (+) or Minus (-): Plus and minus signs are used with a rating symbol
to indicate the relative position of a credit within the rating category. Plus
and minus signs, however, are not used in the "AAA" category.
NR Indicates that Fitch does not rate the specific issue.
Conditional A conditional rating is premised on the successful completion of
a project or the occurrence of a specific event.
Suspended A rating is suspended when Fitch deems the amount of information
available from the issuer to be inadequate for rating purposes.
Withdrawn A rating will be withdrawn when an issue matures or is called or
refinanced and, at Fitch's discretion, when an issuer fails to
furnish proper and timely information.
FitchAlert Ratings are placed on FitchAlert to notify investors of an
occurrence that is likely to result in a rating change and the
likely direction of such change. These are designated as
"Positive," indicating a potential upgrade, "Negative," for
potential downgrade, or "Evolving," where ratings may be raised
or lowered. FitchAlert is relatively short-term, and should be
resolved within 12 months.
Ratings Outlook: An outlook is used to describe the most likely direction
of any rating change over the intermediate term. It is described as "Positive"
or "Negative." The absence of a designation indicates a stable outlook.
DESCRIPTION OF FITCH'S SPECULATIVE GRADE BOND RATINGS
Fitch speculative grade bond ratings provide a guide to investors in
determining the credit risk associated with a particular security. The ratings
("BB" to "C") represent Fitch's assessment of the likelihood of timely payment
of principal and interest in accordance with the terms of obligation for bond
issues not in default. For defaulted bonds, the rating ("DDD" to "D") is an
assessment of the ultimate recovery value through reorganization or liquidation.
The rating takes into consideration special features of the issue, its
relationship to other obligations of the issuer, the current and prospective
financial condition and operating performance of the issuer and any guarantor,
as well as the economic and political environment that might affect the issuer's
future financial strength.
Bonds that have the rating are of similar but not necessarily identical
credit quality since rating categories cannot fully reflect the differences in
degrees of credit risk.
BB Bonds are considered speculative. The obligor's ability to pay
interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse
economic changes. However, business and financial alternatives
can be identified which could assist the obligor in satisfying
its debt service requirements.
B Bonds are considered highly speculative. While bonds in this
class are currently meeting debt service requirements, the
probability of continued timely payment of principal and interest
reflects the obligor's limited margin of safety and the need for
reasonable business and economic activity throughout the life of
the issue.
69
<PAGE> 71
CCC Bonds have certain identifiable characteristics which, if not
remedied, may lead to default. The ability to meet obligations
requires an advantageous business and economic environment.
CC Bonds are minimally protected. Default in payment of interest
and/or principal seems probable over time.
C Bonds are in imminent default in payment of interest or
principal.
DDD
DD
D Bonds are in default on interest and/or principal payments. Such
bonds are extremely speculative and should be valued on the basis
of their ultimate recovery value in liquidation or reorganization
of the obligor. "DDD" represents the highest potential for
recovery on these bonds, and "D" represents the lowest potential
for recovery.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): Plus and minus signs are used with a rating symbol
to indicate the relative position of a credit within the rating category. Plus
and minus signs, however, are not used in the "DDD," "DD," or "D" categories.
DESCRIPTION OF FITCH'S SHORT-TERM RATINGS
Fitch's short-term ratings apply to debt obligations that are payable on
demand or have original maturities of up to three years, including commercial
paper, certificates of deposit, medium-term notes, and municipal and investment
notes.
The short-term rating places greater emphasis than a long-term rating on
the existence of liquidity necessary to meet the issuer's obligations in a
timely manner.
Fitch short-term ratings are as follows:
F-1+ Exceptionally Strong Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating
are regarded as having the strongest degree of assurance for
timely payment.
F-1 Very Strong Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating reflect
an assurance of timely payment only slightly less in degree than
issues rated "F-1+."
F-2 Good Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating have a
satisfactory degree of assurance for timely payment, but the
margin of safety is not as great as for issues assigned "F-1+"
and "F-1" ratings.
F-3 Fair Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating have
characteristics suggesting that the degree of assurance for
timely payment is adequate; however, near-term adverse changes
could cause these securities to be rated below investment grade.
F-S Weak Credit Quality. Issues assigned this rating have
characteristics suggesting a minimal degree of assurance for
timely payment and are vulnerable to near-term adverse changes in
financial and economic conditions.
D Default. Issues assigned this rating are in actual or imminent
payment default.
LOC The symbol "LOC" indicates that the rating is based on a letter
of credit issued by a commercial bank.
70
<PAGE> 72
APPENDIX III
PORTFOLIO INSURANCE
Set forth below is further information with respect to the insurance
policies (the "Policies") that the Fund may obtain from several insurance
companies with respect to insured California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds
held by the Fund. The Fund has no obligation to obtain any such Policies, and
the terms of any Policies actually obtained may vary significantly from the
terms discussed below.
In determining eligibility for insurance, insurance companies will apply
their own standards. These standards correspond generally to the standards such
companies normally use in establishing the insurability of new issues of
California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds and are not necessarily the
criteria that would be used in regard to the purchase of such bonds by the Fund.
The Policies do not insure (i) municipal securities ineligible for insurance and
(ii) municipal securities no longer owned by the Fund.
The Policies do not guarantee the market value of the insured California
Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds or the value of the shares of the Fund. In
addition, if the provider of an original issuance insurance policy is unable to
meet its obligations under such policy or if the rating assigned to the
insurance claims-paying ability of any such insurer deteriorates, the insurance
company will not have any obligation to insure any issue held by the Fund that
is adversely affected by either of the above described events. In addition to
the payment of premiums, the Policies may require that the Fund notify the
insurance company as to all California Municipal Bonds and Municipal Bonds in
the Fund's portfolio and permit the insurance company to audit their records.
The insurance premiums will be payable monthly by the Fund in accordance with a
premium schedule to be furnished by the insurance company at the time the
Policies are issued. Premiums are based upon the amounts covered and the
composition of the portfolio.
The fund will seek to utilize insurance companies that have insurance
claims-paying ability ratings of AAA from Standard & Poor's ("S&P") or Fitch
IBCA, Inc. ("Fitch") or Aaa from Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's"). There
can be no assurance however, that insurance from insurance carriers meeting
these criteria will be at all times available.
An S&P insurance claims-paying ability rating is an assessment of an
operating insurance company's financial capacity to meet obligations under an
insurance policy in accordance with the terms. An insurer with an insurance
claims-paying ability rating of AAA has the highest rating assigned by S&P.
Capacity to honor insurance contracts is considered by S&P to be extremely
strong and highly likely to remain so over a long period of time. A Fitch
insurance claims-paying ability rating provides an assessment of an insurance
company's financial strength and, therefore, its ability to pay policy and
contract claims under the terms indicated. An insurer with an insurance
claims-paying ability rating of AAA has the highest rating assigned by Fitch.
The ability to pay claims is adjudged by Fitch to be extremely strong for
insurance companies with this highest rating. In the opinion of Fitch,
foreseeable business and economic risk factors should not have any material
adverse impact on the ability of these insurers to pay claims. In Fitch's
opinion, profitability, overall balance sheet strength, capitalization and
liquidity are all at very secure levels and are unlikely to be affected by
potential adverse underwriting, investment or cyclical events. A Moody's
insurance claims-paying ability rating is an opinion of the ability of an
insurance company to repay punctually senior policyholder obligations and
claims. An insurer with an insurance
71
<PAGE> 73
claims-paying ability rating of Aaa is considered by Moody's to be of the best
quality. In the opinion of Moody's, the policy obligations of an insurance
company with an insurance claims-paying ability rating of Aaa carry the smallest
degree of credit risk and, while the financial strength of these companies is
likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair
the company's fundamentally strong position.
An insurance claims-paying ability rating of S&P, Fitch or Moody's does not
constitute an opinion on any specific contract in that such an opinion can only
be rendered upon the review of the specific insurance contract. Furthermore, an
insurance claims-paying ability rating does not take into account deductibles,
surrender or cancellation penalties or the timeliness of payment; nor does it
address the ability of a company to meet nonpolicy obligations (i.e., debt
contracts).
The assignment of ratings by S&P, Fitch or Moody's to debt issues that are
fully or partially supported by insurance policies, contracts or guarantees is a
separate process from the determination of claims-paying ability ratings. The
likelihood of a timely flow of funds from the insurer to the trustee for the
bondholders is a key element in the rating determination for such debt issues.
72
<PAGE> 74
APPENDIX IV
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS FOR 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999
TAXABLE INCOME* CALIFORNIA A TAX-FREE YIELD OF
- ------------------------------------ 1999 FEDERAL TAX ---------------------------------------------
SINGLE RETURN JOINT RETURN TAX BRACKET BRACKET 5.00% 5.50% 6.00% 6.50% 7.00% 7.50%
- ----------------- ----------------- ------------ ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
IS EQUAL TO A TAXABLE YIELD OF
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 26,645-$ 33,673 $ 53,288-$ 67,346 28.00% 8.0% 7.55 8.30 9.06 9.81 10.57 11.32
$ 33,674-$ 62,450 $ 67,347-$104,050 28.00% 9.3% 7.66 8.42 9.19 9.95 10.72 11.48
$ 62,451-$130,250 $104,051-$158,550 31.00% 9.3% 7.99 8.79 9.59 10.39 11.19 11.98
$130,251-$283,150 $158,551-$283,150 36.00% 9.3% 8.61 9.47 10.34 11.20 12.06 12.92
Over $283,150 Over $283,150 39.60% 9.3% 9.13 10.04 10.95 11.87 12.78 13.69
</TABLE>
- ------------
* An investor's marginal tax rate may exceed the rates shown in the above table
due to the reduction, or possible elimination, of the personal exemption
deduction for high-income taxpayers and an overall limit on itemized
deductions. For investors who pay alternative minimum tax, tax-free yields may
be equivalent to lower taxable yields than those shown above. Shareholders
subject to income taxation by states other than California will realize a
lower after-tax return than California shareholders. This table is a
combination of the Federal and California taxable income brackets, which are
adjusted annually for inflation. The California taxable income brackets have
not yet been adjusted for 1999. The California taxable yields set forth in the
above table presume that taxpayers in each Federal tax bracket are in the
highest California tax bracket corresponding to that Federal bracket. The tax
rates shown above do not apply to corporate taxpayers subject to the
California corporate franchise tax. The tax characteristics of the Fund are
described more fully elsewhere in this prospectus. Consult your tax adviser
for further details. This chart is for illustrative purposes only and cannot
be taken as an indication of anticipated Fund performance.
73
<PAGE> 75
(This page intentionally left blank.)
<PAGE> 76
(This page intentionally left blank.)
<PAGE> 77
(This page intentionally left blank.)
<PAGE> 78
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through and including September , 1999 (the 90th day after the date of
this prospectus), all dealers effecting transactions in these securities,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
5,000,000 SHARES
MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA INSURED FUND V, INC.
COMMON STOCK
---------------------
PROSPECTUS
---------------------
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
JUNE , 1999
CODE 19061-0699
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 79
PART C. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 24. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
(1) Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Capital as of June , 1999
(2) Exhibits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DESCRIPTION
-----------
<S> <C> <C>
(a)(1) -- Articles of Incorporation of the Fund(a)
(b) -- By-Laws of the Fund(a)
(c) -- Not applicable.
(d)(1) -- Portions of the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the
Fund defining the rights of holders of shares of common
stock of the Fund(b)
(d)(2) -- Form of specimen certificate for shares of common stock of
the Fund(c)
(e) -- Form of Dividend Reinvestment Plan(c)
(f) -- Not applicable
(g) -- Form of Investment Advisory Agreement between the Fund and
Fund Asset Management, L.P.(c)
(h)(1) -- Form of Purchase Agreement between the Fund and Merrill
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated(c)
(h)(2) -- Merrill Lynch Standard Dealer Agreement(c)
(i) -- Not applicable
(j) -- Form of Custodian Contract between the Fund and
*
(k) -- Form of Registrar, Transfer Agency and Service Agreement
between the Fund and *
(l) -- Opinion and Consent of Brown & Wood LLP*
(m) -- Not applicable
(n)(2) -- Consent of , independent auditors for
the Fund*
(o) -- Not applicable
(p) -- Certificate of Fund Asset Management, L.P.*
(q) -- Not applicable
(r) -- Not applicable
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(a) Filed on April 30, 1999 as an exhibit to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-77531).
(b) Reference is made to Article V, Article VI (sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6),
Article VII, Article VIII, Article X, Article XI, Article XII and Article
XIII of the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit (a) to
this Registration Statement; and to Article II, Article III (sections 1, 2,
3, 5 and 17), Article VI, Article VII, Article XII, Article XIII and Article
XIV of the Registrant's By-Laws, filed as Exhibit (b) to this Registration
Statement.
(c) Filed on May 18, 1999 as an exhibit to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-77531).
* To be provided by amendment.
C-1
<PAGE> 80
ITEM 25. MARKETING ARRANGEMENTS.
See Exhibits (h)(1) and (2).
ITEM 26. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The following table sets forth the estimated expenses to be incurred in
connection with the offering described in this Registration Statement:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Registration fees........................................... $ *
New York Stock Exchange listing fee......................... *
Printing (other than stock certificates).................... *
Engraving and printing stock certificates................... *
Legal fees and expenses..................................... *
Accounting fees and expenses................................ *
NASD fees................................................... *
Miscellaneous............................................... *
--------
Total............................................. $ *
========
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* To be provided by amendment.
ITEM 27. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH REGISTRANT.
The information in the prospectus under the captions "Investment Advisory
and Management Arrangements" and "Description of Capital Stock-Common Stock" and
in Note 1 to the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Capital is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 28. NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF SECURITIES.
There will be one record holder of the Common Stock, par value $0.10 per
share, as of the effective date of this Registration Statement.
ITEM 29. INDEMNIFICATION.
Section 2-418 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland,
Article VI of the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit
(a)(1) to this Registration Statement, Article VI of the Registrant's By-Laws,
filed as Exhibit (b) to this Registration Statement, and the Investment Advisory
Agreement, a form of which is filed as Exhibit (g)(1) to this Registration
Statement, provide for indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), may be provided to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Fund, pursuant to the foregoing provisions or
otherwise, the Fund has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the 1933 Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Fund of
expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
Fund in connection with any successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Fund will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
C-2
<PAGE> 81
Reference is made to Section Six of the Purchase Agreement, a form of which
is filed as Exhibit (h)(1) hereto, for provisions relating to the
indemnification of the underwriter.
ITEM 30. BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISER.
Fund Asset Management, L.P. (the "Investment Adviser") acts as investment
adviser for the following open-end registered investment companies: CBA Money
Fund, CMA Government Securities Fund, CMA Money Fund, CMA Multi-State Municipal
Series Trust, CMA Tax-Exempt Fund, CMA Treasury Fund, The Corporate Fund
Accumulation Program, Inc., Financial Institutions Series Trust, Merrill Lynch
Basic Value Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch California Municipal Series Trust, Merrill
Lynch Corporate Bond Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc.,
Merrill Lynch Emerging Tigers Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Federal Securities
Trust, Merrill Lynch Funds for Institutions Series, Merrill Lynch Multi-State
Limited Maturity Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Multi-State Municipal
Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Phoenix
Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Special Value Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch World Income
Fund, Inc., and The Municipal Fund Accumulation Program, Inc., and for the
following closed-end registered investment companies: Apex Municipal Fund, Inc.,
Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc., Corporate High Yield Fund II, Inc., Corporate
High Yield Fund III, Inc., Debt Strategies Fund, Inc., Debt Strategies Fund II,
Inc., Debt Strategies Fund III, Inc., Income Opportunities Fund 1999, Inc.,
Income Opportunities Fund 2000, Inc., Merrill Lynch Municipal Strategy Fund,
Inc., MuniAssets Fund, Inc., MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings Fund, Inc.,
MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund, Inc.,
MuniHoldings California Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured
Fund III, Inc., MuniHoldings California Insured Fund IV, Inc., MuniHoldings
Florida Insured Fund, MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund II, MuniHoldings Florida
Insured Fund III, MuniHoldings Florida Insured Fund IV, MuniHoldings Insured
Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings Michigan Insured
Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey Insured Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey
Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings New Jersey Insured Fund III, Inc.,
MuniHoldings New York Fund, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund, Inc.,
MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniHoldings New York Insured Fund
III, Inc., MuniHoldings Pennsylvania Insured Fund, MuniInsured Fund, Inc.,
MuniVest Florida Fund, MuniVest Fund, Inc., MuniVest Fund II, Inc., MuniVest
Michigan Insured Fund, Inc., MuniVest New Jersey Fund, Inc., MuniVest
Pennsylvania Insured Fund, MuniYield Arizona Fund, Inc., MuniYield California
Fund, Inc., MuniYield California Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield California
Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniYield Florida Fund, MuniYield Florida Insured Fund,
MuniYield Fund, Inc., MuniYield Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield Michigan Fund,
Inc., MuniYield Michigan Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield New Jersey Fund, Inc.,
MuniYield New Jersey Insured Fund, Inc., MuniYield New York Insured Fund, Inc.,
MuniYield New York Insured Fund II, Inc., MuniYield Pennsylvania Fund, MuniYield
Quality Fund, Inc., MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc., Senior High Income
Portfolio, Inc., and Worldwide DollarVest Fund, Inc.
Merrill Lynch Asset Management, L.P. ("MLAM"), an affiliate of the
Investment Adviser, acts as the investment adviser for the following open-end
registered investment companies: Merrill Lynch Adjustable Rate Securities Fund,
Inc., Merrill Lynch Americas Income Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Asset Builder
Program, Inc., Merrill Lynch Asset Growth Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Asset Income
Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Capital Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Convertible Fund,
Inc., Merrill Lynch Developing Capital Markets Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Dragon
Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch EuroFund, Merrill Lynch Fundamental Growth Fund, Inc.,
Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement,
C-3
<PAGE> 82
Merrill Lynch Global Allocation Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Growth Fund,
Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Holdings, Merrill Lynch Global Resources Trust,
Merrill Lynch Global SmallCap Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Technology Fund,
Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Utility Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Global Value Fund,
Inc., Merrill Lynch Growth Fund, Merrill Lynch Healthcare Fund, Inc., Merrill
Lynch Intermediate Government Bond Fund, Merrill Lynch International Equity
Fund, Merrill Lynch Latin America Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Middle East/Africa
Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Municipal Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Pacific Fund,
Inc., Merrill Lynch Ready Assets Trust, Merrill Lynch Real Estate Fund, Inc.,
Merrill Lynch Retirement Series Trust, Merrill Lynch Series Fund, Inc., Merrill
Lynch Short-Term Global Income Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Strategic Dividend
Fund, Merrill Lynch Technology Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch U.S. Treasury Money
Fund, Merrill Lynch U.S.A. Government Reserves, Merrill Lynch Utility Income
Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Variable Series Funds, Inc. and Hotchkis and Wiley
Funds (advised by Hotchkis and Wiley, a division of MLAM); and for the following
closed-end registered investment companies: Merrill Lynch High Income Municipal
Bond Fund, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Senior Floating Rate Fund, Inc. MLAM also acts
as sub-adviser to Merrill Lynch World Strategy Portfolio and Merrill Lynch Basic
Equity Portfolio, two investment portfolios of EQ Advisors Trust.
The address of each of these registered investment companies is P.O. Box
9011, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011, except that the address of Merrill Lynch
Funds for Institutions Series and Merrill Lynch Intermediate Government Bond
Fund is One Financial Center, 23rd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2665.
The address of the Investment Adviser, MLAM, Princeton Services, Inc.
("Princeton Services") and Princeton Administrators, L.P. is also P.O. Box 9011,
Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9011. The address of Princeton Funds Distributor,
Inc. ("PFD") and of Merrill Lynch Funds Distributor ("MLFD") is P.O. Box 9081,
Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9081. The address of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. ("ML&Co.") is
World Financial Center, North Tower, 250 Vesey Street, New York, New York
10281-1201.
Set forth below is a list of each executive officer and partner of the
Investment Adviser indicating each business, profession, vocation or employment
of a substantial nature in which each such person or entity has been engaged for
the past two years for his or her or its own account or in the capacity of
director, officer, employee, partner or trustee. In addition, Mr. Glenn is
President and Mr. Burke is Vice President and Treasurer of all or substantially
all of the investment companies described in the first two paragraphs of this
Item 30 and also hold the same positions with all or substantially all of the
investment companies advised by MLAM as they do with those advised by the
Investment Adviser. Messrs. Giordano and Monagle are officers of one or more of
such companies.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POSITION(S) WITH OTHER SUBSTANTIAL BUSINESS,
NAME INVESTMENT ADVISER PROFESSION, VOCATION OR EMPLOYMENT
---- ---------------------------- ----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ML&Co.................................. Limited Partner Financial Services Holding
Company; Limited Partner of FAM
Princeton Services..................... General Partner General Partner of MLAM
</TABLE>
C-4
<PAGE> 83
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POSITION(S) WITH OTHER SUBSTANTIAL BUSINESS,
NAME INVESTMENT ADVISER PROFESSION, VOCATION OR EMPLOYMENT
---- ---------------------------- ----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Jeffrey M. Peek........................ President Executive Vice President of MLAM;
Executive Vice President and
Director of Princeton Services;
President and Director of PFD;
Director of Financial Data
Services, Inc. ("FDS")
Terry K. Glenn......................... Executive Vice President Executive Vice President of MLAM;
Executive Vice President and
Director of Princeton Services;
President and Director of PFD;
Director of FDS; President of
Princeton Administrators, L.P.
Donald C. Burke........................ Senior Vice President, Senior Vice President and
Treasurer and Director of Treasurer of FAM; Senior Vice
Taxation President and Treasurer of
Princeton Services; Vice President
of PFD; First Vice President of
the Investment Adviser from 1997
to 1999; Vice President of the
Investment Adviser from 1990 to
1997
Michael G. Clark....................... Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of FAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services; Treasurer and Director
of PFD; First Vice President of
the Investment Adviser from 1997
to 1999; Vice President of the
Investment Adviser from 1996 to
1997
Linda L. Federici...................... Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services
Vincent R. Giordano.................... Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services
Michael J. Hennewinkel................. Senior Vice President, Senior Vice President of MLAM;
General Counsel and Senior Vice President, Director
Secretary and Secretary of Princeton
Services
</TABLE>
C-5
<PAGE> 84
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POSITION(S) WITH OTHER SUBSTANTIAL BUSINESS,
NAME INVESTMENT ADVISER PROFESSION, VOCATION OR EMPLOYMENT
---- ---------------------------- ----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Philip L. Kirstein..................... Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President General
Counsel; Director and Secretary of
Princeton Services
Ronald M. Kloss........................ Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services;
Debra W. Landsman-Yaros................ Senior Vice President Vice President of PFD
Stephen M. M. Miller................... Senior Vice President Executive Vice President of
Princeton Administrators, L.P.;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services
Joseph T. Monagle, Jr.................. Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services
Brian A. Murdock....................... Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services Senior Vice President and
Treasurer of MLAM;
Gregory D. Upah........................ Senior Vice President Senior Vice President of MLAM;
Senior Vice President of Princeton
Services
</TABLE>
ITEM 31. LOCATION OF ACCOUNT AND RECORDS.
All accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by
Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the Rules
promulgated thereunder are maintained at the offices of the Registrant (800
Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536), its investment adviser (800
Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536), and its custodian and
transfer agent.
ITEM 32. MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 33. UNDERTAKINGS.
(a) Registrant undertakes to suspend the offering of the shares of common
stock covered hereby until it amends its prospectus contained herein if (1)
subsequent to the effective date of this Registration Statement, its net asset
value per share of common stock declines more than 10% from its net asset value
per share of common stock as of the effective date of this Registration
Statement, or (2) its net asset value per share of common stock increases to an
amount greater than its net proceeds as stated in the prospectus contained
herein.
(b) Registrant undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the 1933 Act, the
information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this
Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form
of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 497(h) under the
1933 Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of
the time it was declared effective.
C-6
<PAGE> 85
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the 1933 Act,
each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
C-7
<PAGE> 86
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this
Pre-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Township of Plainsboro,
and State of New Jersey, on the 11(th) day of June, 1999.
MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA INSURED FUND V,
INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ TERRY K. GLENN
--------------------------------------
(Terry K. Glenn, President)
Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Terry K. Glenn,
Donald C. Burke or William E. Zitelli, Jr., or any of them, as attorney-in-fact,
to sign on his or her behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below,
any amendment to this Registration Statement (including post-effective
amendments) and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed below by the following person in the
capacities and on the date indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURES TITLE DATE
---------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ TERRY K. GLENN President (Principal Executive June 11, 1999
- --------------------------------------------------- Officer) and Director
(Terry K. Glenn)
/s/ DONALD C. BURKE Treasurer (Principal Financial and June 11, 1999
- --------------------------------------------------- Accounting Officer)
(Donald C. Burke)
/s/ RONALD W. FORBES Director June 11, 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------
(Ronald W. Forbes)
/s/ CYNTHIA A. MONTGOMERY Director June 11, 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------
(Cynthia A. Montgomery)
/s/ CHARLES C. REILLY Director June 11, 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------
(Charles C. Reilly)
/s/ KEVIN A. RYAN Director June 11, 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------
(Kevin A. Ryan)
/s/ RICHARD R. WEST Director June 11, 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------
(Richard R. West)
/s/ ARTHUR ZEIKEL Director June 11, 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------
(Arthur Zeikel)
</TABLE>
C-8
