C BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS INC, 10-K/A, 2000-04-04

C BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS INC
10-K/A, 2000-04-04
BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC

Previous: DIGS INC, 10KSB, 2000-04-04

Next: LABRANCHE & CO INC, 10-K/A, 2000-04-04

<PAGE>

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

----------------
FORM 10-K/A

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999,

[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

C-bridge Internet Solutions, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 7371 52-2001899
(Primary Standard (I.R.S.
(State or other Industrial EmployerIdentification
jurisdiction of Classification Code Number)
incorporation or Number)
organization)

219 Vassar Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

(617) 497-1707
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, $.01 par value NASDAQ
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value
</TABLE>

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [_]

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of March 1, 2000 was approximately $304,581,200.

As of March 1, 2000, there were 19,860,147 shares of Common Stock of the
registrant issued and 19,347,439 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain documents listed below have been incorporated by reference into the
indicated part of this Form 10-K:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Document Incorporated Part of 10-K
--------------------- ------------
<S> <C>
Registrant's Amendment No. 6 to Form S-1 Part I, Item 5; Part IV, Item 14
Registration Statement, filed on December 16,
1999. (File #333-89069)

Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting Part III, Items 10-13
of Stockholders
</TABLE>

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Form 10-K/A filing was made because the signature page was
inadvertantly omitted from the Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2000. In all other
respects, this filing is identical to that Form 10-K.

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Statements in
Item 1, Business and Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Operations and Financial Condition sections of this filing, together with
other statements beginning with such words as "believes", "intends", "plans",
and "expects" include forward-looking statements that are based on
management's expectations given facts as currently known by management. Actual
results may differ materially. Factors that could cause the Company's future
results to differ materially from the expectations described herein include
but are not limited to the profitability of the Company's fixed-price
contracts, the Company's ability to hire, train, and retain qualified
employees, the Company's ability to continue to develop effective sales and
marketing capabilities, the Company's ability to keep pace with the Internet's
rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards and changing client
requirements, worldwide business use of the Internet, the growth in the number
of web access devices per user, the absence of any failure of the Internet,
the continued improvement of security on the Internet, and general economic
and industry conditions.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

C-bridge Internet Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") is a full service provider
of Internet-based solutions designed to help companies conduct eBusiness. The
Company adds value to its clients by incorporating its expertise in business
issue diagnosis and resolution, business and technology strategy development
and the delivery of advanced Internet applications and eBusiness solutions.
Additionally, through the C-bridge Institute, the Company offers clients
executive education services on topics relevant to senior executives' efforts
to successfully develop and implement Internet technologies and eBusiness
strategies.

The Company has focused the staffing of its senior management team as well
as the appointment of its board of directors around certain core competencies
that are strategic to the Company's eBusiness solutions. These core
competencies include business strategy development, supply chain management,
service chain management, education, creative design, branding and marketing,
systems architecture design and back-end systems integration.

The Company has gained considerable expertise through its strategic
relationships with major technology product and service providers, including
Hewlett-Packard and Oracle. The Company has also continued to increase the
value of its brand and its unique lead generation methodology by developing
relationships with senior executives of a significant number of Global 1000
companies who have attended the Company's executive education seminars.
Through the delivery of these seminars worldwide, the Company educates over
5,000 business managers and executives each year on business and technology
strategies related to the Internet. The Company views this as a third sales
channel which complements its own direct sales efforts and sales resulting
from its client-partner model which the Company runs on an account-by-account
basis through its services delivery organization.

For the year ended December 31, 1999, three professional services clients
accounted for approximately 45% of the Company's total net revenues, of which
23% were from Chevron, 12% were from Allmerica and 10% were from USWest. In
addition, one educational services client, CEE, accounted for 17% of our total
net revenues. In 1998, three professional services clients accounted for
approximately 51% of the Company's total

2
<PAGE>

net revenues, of which 25% were from Chevron, 16% were from Johnstone Supply
and 10% were from Toyota. In 1997, three professional services clients
accounted for 51% of the Company's total net revenues, consisting of 28% of
total net revenues from Toyota, 12% of total net revenues from Caterpillar and
11% of total net revenues from OnMoney.

Industry Background

Growth of the Internet and eBusiness

The Internet has evolved into a dynamic platform for conducting business.
Faced with growing competition, deregulation and globalization, companies are
increasingly looking to utilize Internet technologies to develop a sustainable
competitive advantage. They have begun to expand their use of efficient and
low-cost Internet technologies to replace or enhance traditional operations,
such as customer relationship management, supply and service chain management,
employee training and communication.

Companies are now moving away from implementing standard applications toward
assembled applications based on Internet standard architectures. Configuring
and customizing large applications was possible when business strategies could
be supported by the functionality of static systems. Competitive pressures
have driven companies to adopt business strategies that require dynamic,
flexible business processes and applicable technical infrastructure. Today,
many companies are using Internet standards when designing their systems
architecture and then use system components that can be assembled into a
flexible solution. With an architectural approach, companies not only get the
system flexibility they are looking for, but they are also able to assemble
the precise functionality required to create a competitive advantage.

Market for Full Service eBusiness Solution Providers

Given the move toward standard architecture, successful adoption of the
Internet for eBusiness poses significant architectural, creative, strategic
and technical design challenges. The successful alignment of business and
Internet strategies requires an understanding of how the Internet can
transform relationships among companies' various constituencies, including
their employees, customers and business partners. However, companies facing
major technology investment decisions often need outside technical expertise
to identify and evaluate viable Internet tools, develop feasible systems
architectures and implement strategies. Companies must also be able to
integrate new Internet applications with their existing systems and data
warehouses. Finally, a successful solution requires that the Internet-based
solution, particularly the user interface, must be engaging and easy to use.
Few companies have the range of skills necessary to recognize the ways in
which Internet technologies can transform their businesses and implement
sophisticated eBusiness solutions. Even if companies can obtain skills in each
of these strategy, technology and creative disciplines, they often have little
experience coordinating them to fully exploit the Internet and related
technologies.

Market Opportunities

eBusiness solutions providers can be divided into four major categories:
large systems integrators, specialty systems integrators, strategy consulting
firms and Internet professional services providers. While many competitors in
each category have specific strengths, each tends to focus on only a part of
the overall solution. Few integrate business and marketing strategy with
expertise in Internet-specific technology and architectural design services to
help businesses achieve the full potential that the Internet offers.

As the level of familiarity and sophistication with Internet technologies
continues to grow, so does the need for full eBusiness service providers that
can help formulate a focused, strategic and integrated approach to the
implementation of eBusiness solutions that add measurable value to the client.
This rapidly increasing demand for eBusiness solutions, combined with the
inability of many current eBusiness solution providers to deliver all of the
strategic, creative and technical skills required by clients, has created
significant market opportunities which remain largely unaddressed.

3
<PAGE>

The C-bridge Solution

The Company designs and implements sophisticated eBusiness solutions to help
its clients develop intelligent business strategies, drive incremental sales
volume, reduce costs and accelerate business transactions both internally with
employees and externally with vendors, suppliers and customers. At the C-
bridge Institute, the Company educates senior-level executives from Global
1000 companies about the Internet, diagnoses new eBusiness strategies and
systems architecture shortcomings and then delivers strategic eBusiness
solutions that are designed to enhance the Company's clients' core business,
operations and communications. The Company's solution has five essential
elements:

--Provide integrated Internet strategy, technology and systems architecture
design services. The Company provides a comprehensive set of integrated
services designed to implement sophisticated eBusiness solutions. These
services include strategic consulting, design of systems architectures and
end-user interfaces, and creation and customization of software. The
Company works with its clients to analyze their business issues, design an
appropriate technology and systems architecture and implement an effective
eBusiness solution. The Company's services assist its clients to evaluate
their strategies and transform their businesses to take advantage of the
Internet.

--Offer high value-added eBusiness solutions which can be quickly developed
and deployed. The Company's goal is to enable its clients to improve their
overall business practices by providing robust eBusiness solutions that
can increase sales, improve operational efficiencies and create or enhance
business identities. The Company provides application assembly and
development and systems integration services by employing the latest in
Internet technologies. The Company's clients benefit not only from time
and cost savings, but also from robust and scalable solutions that can be
implemented quickly and seamlessly. This approach also reduces
miscommunications and delays that can occur when the design, customization
and implementation are handled by multiple service providers.

--Offer eBusiness education to senior-level Global 1000 executives around
the world. The Company has a unique channel opportunity structured around
the delivery of executive education. Through an outsourcing agreement, the
Company has partnered with CEE to deliver content, lectures, and
demonstrations for its executive education programs. These seminars help
executives understand how Internet technologies can benefit their
business. The Company's relationship with CEE gives it direct high-level
access to the corporate executives who attend. CEE's current major
sponsors, Hewlett-Packard and Oracle, are also alliance partners. At the
seminars, the Company works with its alliance partners to help business
executives begin to understand their business problems and identify
possible eBusiness solutions. To date, these seminars have been the
Company's most significant source of lead generation.

--Combine strategic industry and business domain expertise to create
iSolutions. To date, the Company has focused the delivery of its services
on four industry groups: retail and distribution; banking, finance and
insurance; manufacturing; and utilities and telecommunications. The
Company has developed valuable intellectual capital and expertise in these
areas. The Company complements its industry focus with expertise in cross-
industry functional solution areas. This enables the Company to understand
its clients' particular business processes and competitive positions and
to create iSolutions that are best suited to their needs. An iSolution is
a combination of a business strategy, a workflow template and a technical
architecture. Since each of these continues to move in time, an iSolution
by definition is an environment rather than a traditional application. As
competition dictates moves in strategy, as new ideas emerge around best in
class workflows and as new products and technologies are introduced, the
iSolution needs to be flexible in order to achieve a competitive
advantage. The industry experts in the Company's iSolutions group develop
and deliver the industry vertical solutions to clients. The Company's
iSolutions can then be used as benchmarks during both diagnosis and
delivery, improving both the speed of delivery and quality of the
Company's solutions.

--Leverage the Company's intellectual capital to benefit clients. The
Company utilizes technology to accumulate and disseminate information and
to ensure the growth and development of its intellectual

4
<PAGE>

capital. This information is tracked and stored in the Company's corporate
intranet, which acts as a centralized intellectual capital repository. The
Company's intranet is both a solutions library that facilitates the
dissemination of intellectual capital across its business and an internal
project management system that captures detailed information on the
resources required to achieve specific tasks on a project. The ability to
reuse intellectual capital allows the Company to predict project
completion requirements more accurately and provide fixed-cost contracts,
further reducing risk for the Company's clients.

Strategy

The Company's goal is to become the leading provider of eBusiness services
to Global 1000 companies. To achieve this objective, the Company is pursuing
the following strategies:

--Continue to enhance the Company's Business framework and design
patterns. The Company has developed significant technological capabilities
and expertise in systems architecture and design patterns, which it uses
to deliver sophisticated eBusiness solutions. The Company intends to
continue to develop and invest in its framework and design patterns, which
form the foundation of its client engagements. In particular, the Company
intends to continuously adapt its framework and design patterns to
evolving and emerging Internet technologies in order to meet the needs of
a worldwide client base.

--Develop and expand client relationships. The Company establishes strong
ties with its clients' senior management by assisting them in addressing
their strategic business issues. The Company leverages these relationships
through the C-bridge Institute to expand the scope and length of current
projects and to enter into additional projects. The Company's strategy is
to leverage its industry expertise, technology skills, and scale by
expanding the scope of client relationships into broader engagements,
including additional Internet strategy consulting, design, systems
engineering and application development services.

--Capture and disseminate reusable knowledge and best practices. The
Company's employees have developed a broad base of knowledge and best
practices. Its strategy is to continue to capture this knowledge and these
best practices for dissemination throughout its business, and to expand
these capabilities where appropriate through acquisitions and external
hiring. The Company has established a library of reusable software
objects, templates and horizontal business solutions from the client
engagements which continue to grow as projects are completed. The current
set of horizontal business solutions were created as a best practice
within one industry sector but are leverageable across multiple sectors.
The Company intends to leverage this library to deliver solutions rapidly
and cost-effectively in multiple industries. The Company believe this will
provide us with a significant competitive advantage, particularly when
providing services under fixed-price contracts.

--Leverage and expand the Company's industry-specific expertise. The
Company has assembled industry centers of expertise within its practice
groups, including professionals with expertise in the business practices
and processes of several specific industries. The Company believes that
combining industry-specific knowledge with its best practices and design
patterns enables the Company to provide effective Internet strategy
consulting and services tailored to the specific needs of its clients. In
addition, the industry expertise reduces the learning curve on new
engagements, improving efficiency of implementation and reducing project
delivery times. The Company's strategy is to augment its regional industry
capability by recruiting senior professionals from major consulting firms
and companies in relevant industries.

--Expand geographic presence. The Company has established offices in
Australia, the UK and the Nordic countries. It also intends to establish
additional offices across the United States, as well as in Europe and the
Pacific Rim. This will allow the Company to serve more clients on a local
basis, helping to forge strong, long-term client relationships and to
serve the needs of its clients and their customers and vendors.

5
<PAGE>

The Company's Methodology and Services

The Company has developed a fully integrated services methodology, Profit
Life Cycle Management, to assist companies in the ongoing process of expanding
and improving business through technology. This methodology enables businesses
to produce cycles of value from one development phase to another, assisting
the company in becoming a leader in its business and creating a workable
business design that enhances its bottom line. The Profit Life Cycle
Management methodology provides companies with eBusiness solutions and
services that enable the parts of an organization to synchronize around
achieving the greatest benefit for the organization as a whole, to focus on
global rather than local performance, to understand the patterns and
frameworks that help managers succeed and to achieve the goals of the company
with the Internet as the enabler.

Program Management

The Company's Program Management services include a set of planned
activities and associated deliverables that are conducted over the duration of
our engagement. The primary focus of Program Management is on the successful
implementation of the business change resulting in the realization of business
value. Throughout the program the Company works with a team of key
representatives from the client as well as the alliance partners to ensure a
smooth implementation process. A client engagement team determines the
benefits, assesses the project risks, determines communication and training
needs and develops a rollout approach for the iSolution. These activities are
accomplished using a set of customizable tools tailored to the client's
specific situation. Working with the business organization, the Company
synthesizes all of this information into an integrated Program Management
plan. This plan is used throughout the diagnosis and delivery phases and
provides a comprehensive approach toward attaining business benefits.

Business Innovation

The Company works with its clients to better understand their core
businesses and operations in order to focus on an innovative, rather than an
incremental, approach toward designing eBusiness solutions tailored to their
needs. The Company believes that a truly successful eBusiness solution can
only be achieved through an interactive process where new opportunities are
generated by evolving existing ideas. For example, the banking industry is
moving steadily to the world of eCommerce. However, simply migrating
traditional banking services such as cash management to the Internet will not
be enough to maintain market share in this new competitive environment. Banks,
like most other industries, will need to innovate their existing business to
succeed in this new electronic marketplace.

Education and Customer Mentoring

Through its C-bridge Institute, the Company offers executive education
classes and workshops to executives, managers and staff of its clients and
continue throughout the life cycle of a client relationship. From executive
education addressing business strategy and technology through management
education on business processes, best practices, technology transfer and
employee re-skilling around the Internet, the Company offers a broad
educational suite. The Company is rapidly expanding the course syllabus across
all of these areas and will continue to keep pace with business and
technological advancement. Through these educational services, the Company
empowers its client base to drive the organizational, business process and
technological changes required to compete in a highly competitive marketplace.

Diagnosis

The Company's diagnosis services are structured to improve the clients'
understanding of the power and potential of eBusiness solutions. Clients can
choose their preferred combination of services based on their particular
needs.

6
<PAGE>

--Internet strategy analysis. Internet strategy analysis is a two-to-four
week engagement in which the Company works with its clients to
incorporate Internet technologies into their business strategies. Within
Internet strategy analysis the Company has four paths of analysis:
business to business, business to consumer, device to device and
marketing and branding. The result is a set of strategies, high-level
workflows and a series of metrics to direct the strategy and keep
subsequent application development plans consistent with appropriate
goals and objectives.

--Business value analysis. Business value analysis is a two-to-four week
engagement where the Company helps clients identify and quantify
prominent business opportunities where the Internet can be leveraged to
gain a competitive advantage and realize business value. The Company
employs a series of financial models that are used to convert the current
corporate financial structures into a more workflow-oriented financial
analysis. The Company then compares the client's financial performance
against that of other companies in the sector and in other industries,
and links financial performance to changes in business process workflows.
As a baseline for the business process analysis, the Company's library of
dominant workflows and best practices is directly connected to enabling
business objects that can be assembled into an iSolution.

--Internet readiness assessment. The Internet readiness assessment helps
the Company's clients evaluate their current Internet capabilities in a
three-to-five week engagement. Recent developments in technology
platforms, new techniques such as distributed object computing, and end-
user demands for features such as multi-media interfaces, require a
robust Internet architecture to enable the solutions of the future.
Business processes, the technology environment and support systems are
first reviewed and catalogued through a series of interactive workshops.
The Company then performs rapid pattern recognition against a knowledge
base of best practice systems designs that help determine whether the
client's information technology architecture meets the demands of next-
generation applications.

--Internet visioning session. Throughout the diagnosis phase, the Company
works with clients to explore and create a vision of how a chosen
Internet strategy will result in measurable business value. By using
Internet-standard prototyping tools and methods, the Company can quickly
assemble an Internet vision application suitable for executive
presentation. The Internet vision application serves as a shared vision
of what a client can achieve using Internet technologies and increases
the client's confidence in moving forward.

Delivery

The Company's delivery services use a proven methodology, standard design
patterns and reusable software components to assemble the Company's solutions,
increase reliability and product quality, reduce costs and keep project teams
focused on delivering business functionality. The Company delivers processes
that support a rigorous systems integration standard. In most cases, a
strategic Internet solution must be integrated with existing legacy systems.
These systems may include a number of components which are not based on
Internet standards. Therefore, a solid integration approach around
applications, data, and messaging and existing systems is critical.
Application development efforts are based on well-defined specifications and
release schedules are aligned with business priorities.

--The define phase. The define phase establishes the business case and lays
out the business requirements and processes that are to be supported by
the new application. During this stage, the Company utilizes object-
oriented analysis techniques and intensive workshop sessions to help
gather input and ensure effective interaction with project stakeholders.
Incremental culture, organization and business process changes are
accomplished through multiple workshop sessions. Collectively, the define
phase deliverable consists of the initial specification and scope of work
to follow.

--The design phase. The goal of the design phase is to lay out the
technical blueprint for the new application in order to avoid costly
defects during programming. The main deliverables from this phase are
object models, technical design specifications, a detailed user interface
design, working components

7
<PAGE>

that demonstrate the viability of the new systems infrastructure, a
systems test plan and a refined project plan. The Company's philosophy is
to leverage legacy systems and commercial off-the-shelf software within a
robust application framework that responds easily to changing business and
technological requirements and enables quick delivery of new applications.

--The development phase. The development phase consists principally of the
coding, assembly and testing necessary to create a production-caliber
application. The Company uses established software engineering
techniques, team-based development tools, frequent checkpoints and
traditional code reviews to ensure tight collaboration and high quality.
Since the scope and design of the application were validated and approved
in previous phases, the team is well positioned to deliver a fast, on-
target release. Short, incremental code, assembly and test cycles are
used to allow project teams to constantly monitor the quality of the
application.

--The deployment phase. After development, the Company assists in the
deployment of the application in areas such as education, documentation,
release management and systems administration. Planning for deployment
frequently begins before application development even starts. The goal is
to provide whatever support is necessary to allow clients to start
realizing tangible business benefit from the new application quickly and
efficiently.

--Subsequent releases and enhancements. Project plans are often based on
incremental application releases to allow early return on investment and
ease the burden of change management in our clients' environments. The
project team simply loops through multiple delivery cycles until the
overall scope of the application is achieved.

Risk Management

The objective of the Risk Management Practice is to provide an independent
view of a project's actual progress in terms of schedule, staffing and
deliverables, and to identify those constraints, issues or risks which could
threaten a project's success. Recommendations for issue resolution or risk
mitigation are also documented. Additionally, risk management checks provide
an opportunity to channel input, or escalate issues, to several of the
Company's work groups, such as senior management, development and account
management.

Technology Transfer

The Company's technology transfer services focus on transferring the
requisite Internet know-how to the client. It typically takes up to one year
to educate a client's internal staff of IT professionals in the latest
Internet technologies, standards, platforms and methods. By combining an
actual project with this service, the Company is typically able to complete a
technology transfer to the in-house IT organization within six months. As part
of this service, the Company licenses to the client the applicable design
patterns and frameworks.

Systems Management

Once an iSolution has been deployed, in many cases the Company provides the
client with additional support in managing the new environment as they
complete the technology transfer program. In some instances, the client elects
to have the Company manage the entire system in order to focus on their core
competencies.

Sales

The Company markets its solutions and services through its headquarters in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, with sales professionals also located domestically
in Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, New York, Newport Beach and San
Francisco, and internationally in London, England, Stockholm, Sweden and
Sydney, Australia. The Company believes that a regional sales focus, combined
with its local solutions services approach, allows it to develop a strong
market presence and enhanced customer loyalty. The Company's sales
professionals operate through a coordinated and structured process to evaluate
prospective clients, target qualified prospects and secure new client
engagements.

8
<PAGE>

The Company's solutions and services are marketed principally to Global 1000
companies, with emphasis on retail and distribution, banking, finance and
insurance, manufacturing, and utilities and telecommunications. In addition,
the Company focuses on horizontal applications including service chain and
supply chain management, CRM, procurement, exchanges, portals and data
warehousing. Finally, the Company has initiated a marketing strategy focusing
on mid-tier value-added resellers of Oracle applications and Hewlett-Packard
business solutions.

The Company creates demand for its solutions and services through four sales
channels:

. direct territory development through the domestic and international sales
force;

. through relationships developed at the C-bridge Institute;

. working with its strategic partners; and

. through relationships with strategic applications vendors.

Marketing

The Company's sales efforts are supplemented by marketing and communications
activities which it pursues to further build brand name and recognition in the
marketplace. The Company's goals include the following:

. to plan and build an integrated program addressing both internal and
external audiences;

. to design and implement media and tactical programs that communicate most
effectively with the Company's target audiences;

. to position the Company as the standard in providing results-driven
eBusiness solutions; and

. to clearly and consistently communicate the Company's positioning in all
marketing programs.

From a public relations standpoint, the Company is targeting specific media.
For example, computer and Internet trade media, business and majority media
(newspapers, broadcast and wire services) and industry analyst communities.
The Company plans to conduct media/analyst tours twice per year in major
cities (such as Boston, New York, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.). Also,
the Company is planning editors and analysts days where it will host target
editors and analysts for half-day one-on-one sessions and customer
demonstrations.

Clients

The Company's clients include the following companies:

. Retail and Distribution: Aviall, Chevron, Cardinal Health Care, Carlton
United Breweries, Fabri-Centers of America, Johnstone Supply, Liz
Claiborne, Polo Ralph Lauren and Trane;

. Banking, Finance and Insurance: Aegon, Allmerica, Central Carolina Bank,
Frost Bank and OnMoney (Ameritrade);

. Manufacturing: Buell (Harley Davidson), Caterpillar, Firmenich, General
Motors, Quantum, SteelCase and Toyota; and

. Utilities and Telecommunications: Sprint, UNIFI and US West.

9
<PAGE>

Strategic Alliances

The Company's strategic alliances focus on large companies with proven
success in the Company's principal line of focus. These organizations
typically have large field operations and are in a position to recommend
and/or sub-contract the Company's education and consulting services. The
current alliances include:

Oracle

The Company has developed a strategic relationship with Oracle at multiple
levels throughout its organization including the eBusiness Group, U.S. Sales,
and Consulting Services. The Company and Oracle have entered into an agreement
to deliver joint business solutions based on the Company's Profit Life Cycle
Management methodology. The foundation of the alliance is based on leveraging
the Company's unique abilities in executive education, Internet visioning and
rapid application development with Oracle's consulting expertise and vast
resources.

The Company and Oracle jointly engage in co-marketing and branding
activities to support the business development efforts in this partnership.
Included in this effort is the development of a custom lead tracking/sales
force automation application designed to track leads generated through the
executive seminars. Business development activities initially focused on
generating business through the seminar series but has expanded beyond the
seminars and into the Company's respective field operations. The Company and
Oracle often work together on the same engagement teams but under separate
contracts with the client.

Mr. Raymond J. Lane, the president and chief operating officer of Oracle,
joined the Company's board of directors in October 1999.

Hewlett-Packard

The Company has developed a working relationship with Hewlett-Packard at
multiple levels within the respective organizations, including the personal
systems group, local products organization and the professional services
organization. The marketing alliances include the retail marketing group,
Internet imaging marketing and other groups. The Company and Hewlett-Packard
regularly engage in co-marketing and branding activities to support their
respective business development efforts.

Cambridge Executive Enterprises

The Company has entered into a five-year outsourcing agreement pursuant to
which it and Cambridge Executive Enterprises jointly provide executive
education programs, delivered under the sponsorship of major technology
product and service providers such as Hewlett-Packard, Parametric Technologies
Corporation, Informix and Oracle. In 1999, there were 42 such programs.
Typically, the programs annually draw more than 3,000 participants throughout
the world, including many senior executives and managers from Global 1000
companies, who seek to learn how to merge their IT strategies with their
continually evolving business objectives.

Recruiting and Career Development

To succeed, the Company must continue to identify, recruit, hire,
professionally develop and retain outstanding professionals. The Company
believes that its success in recruiting and retaining such individuals will
depend significantly on its ability to provide continued professional
development and competitive benefits, as well as financial rewards and
incentives through compensation and equity incentives.

The Company dedicates significant resources to its recruiting efforts and
manages it similarly to a sales function. As of December 31, 1999, the Company
employed seven professionals who focused full-time on recruiting. The
recruiting efforts are targeted at three levels: college recruiting, technical
and management. In addition to the efforts of the Company's in-house
recruiting group, the Company seeks to meet its hiring needs

10
<PAGE>

through referrals and through technical and executive search firms. While
recruiting personnel are responsible for screening candidates, business,
functional or administrative managers make hiring decisions for their own
groups in order to help ensure high-quality hires.

The Company believes that its continuous focus on career development will
help the Company retain its highly skilled personnel. Upon joining the
Company, each new employee participates in a multi-day training program that
covers a broad range of topics, including technology, consulting and
proprietary methodology. During their first year with the Company, recent
college graduates receive approximately four to five weeks of training and
experienced hires receive approximately three weeks of training. The Company
has also created a sponsorship program where experienced employees provide
ongoing career development, mentorship and training to less-experienced
employees. The Company's existing employees attend professional development
and training programs and keep apprised of technological advances and
developments through on-the-job exposure to relevant technology.

Competition

While the market for Internet professional services is relatively new, it is
already highly competitive. In many cases the Company competes with the in-
house technical staff of its prospective clients. In addition, the market is
characterized by an increasing number of entrants that have introduced or
developed products and services similar to those offered by the Company. The
Company believes that competition will intensify and increase in the future.
The Company's target market is rapidly evolving and is subject to continuous
technological change. As a result, the Company's competitors may be better
positioned to address these developments or may react more favorably to these
changes, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
results of operations and financial condition. The Company competes on the
basis of a number of factors, including the following:

. integrated strategy, technology and architectural design services;

. architectural design and systems engineering expertise;

. technological innovation;

. quality, pricing and speed of service delivery;

. understanding clients' strategies and needs;

. client references; and

. vertical industry knowledge.

Many of these factors are beyond the Company's control. Existing or future
competitors may develop or offer strategic Internet services that provide
significant technological, creative, performance, price or other advantages
over the services offered by the Company.

The Company currently competes for client assignments and experienced
personnel principally with Internet service firms, systems integrators,
management consulting firms, computer hardware and service vendors and
advertising agencies.

Many of these businesses have longer operating histories and significantly
greater financial, technical, marketing and managerial resources than the
Company has. Many of these businesses also generate significantly higher
revenues, are better known than the Company and offer a greater breadth of
management consulting services. There are relatively low barriers to entry
into the Company's business. The Company has no patented or other proprietary
technology that would preclude or inhibit competitors from entering the
Internet professional services market. Therefore, the Company must rely on the
skill of its personnel and the quality of its client service. The costs to
develop and provide Internet services are low. Therefore, the Company expects
that it will continually face additional competition from new entrants into
the market in the future, and it is subject to the

11
<PAGE>

risk that its employees may leave and start competing businesses. Any one of
the foregoing factors could have a material and adverse effect on the
Company's business.

Proprietary and Intellectual Property Rights

The Company has developed detailed tools, processes and methodologies
underlying the software code, scripts, libraries and other technology used
internally and in its client engagements. The Company regards its copyrights,
trade secrets and other intellectual property as critical to its success.
Unauthorized use of the Company's intellectual property by third parties may
damage its brand and its reputation. The Company relies on trademark and
copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality, non-disclosure,
license and other agreements with its employees, customers, partners and
others to protect its intellectual property rights. Despite precautions, it
may be possible for third parties to obtain and use the Company's intellectual
property without its authorization. Furthermore, the validity, enforceability
and scope of protection of intellectual property in Internet-related
industries is uncertain and still evolving. The laws of some foreign countries
do not protect intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the
United States.

The Company pursues the registration of its trademarks in the United States.
The Company may not be able to secure adequate protection of its trademarks in
the United States and other countries. The Company has received a trademark
registration in the United States for the C-BRIDGE mark. If the Company is
unable to protect the trademark registrations for its trademark, it would be
unable to fully enforce its statutory trademark rights against third parties
for this trademark, and/or the Company may decide to replace this trademark
with new trademarks. This could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Effective
trademark protection may not be available in all the countries in which the
Company conducts business. Policing unauthorized use of trademarks is also
difficult and expensive. In addition, it is possible that the Company's
competitors have adopted or will adopt product or service names similar to
that of the Company, thereby impeding its ability to build brand identity and
possibly leading to customer confusion.

The Company cannot be certain that its services and the finished products
that it delivers do not or will not infringe valid patents, copyrights,
trademarks or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. The
Company may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time
relating to the intellectual property of others in the ordinary course of its
business. The Company may incur substantial expenses in defending against
these third-party infringement claims, regardless of their merit. Successful
infringement claims against the Company may result in substantial monetary
liability or may materially disrupt the conduct of the Company's business. The
Company cannot be certain that the steps it has taken to protect its
proprietary rights will be adequate to deter misappropriation of its
intellectual property, and the Company may not be able to detect unauthorized
use and take appropriate steps to enforce its intellectual property rights.

Employees

At December 31, 1999, the Company had a total of 249 employees, of which 147
were assigned to professional services, 14 were assigned to educational
services, 45 were assigned to sales and marketing and 43 were assigned to
general and administration. None of the Company's employees are represented by
a labor union. The Company has never experienced any work stoppages and
considers its relations with its employees to be good.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Facilities

The Company currently leases approximately 28,000 square feet of space at
its headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts under a lease that expires on May
1, 2004. The Company also maintains offices in Detroit, New York and San
Francisco and leases short-term office spaces in Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth,
and Newport Beach, and internationally in London, England and Sydney,
Australia. The Company believes it will be able to obtain additional space on
an as-needed basis at commercially reasonable rates.

12
<PAGE>

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation incidental to the
conduct of its business. The Company is not a party to any lawsuit or
proceeding that, in the opinion of its management, is likely to have a
material adverse effect on its business.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

13
<PAGE>

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

(a) The Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common
Stock"), is traded on the Nasdaq National Market ("Nasdaq/NM") under the
symbol "CBIS". Trading of the Common Stock commenced on December 17, 1999.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1999
------------
<S> <C>
High........................ $60.38
Low......................... $40.00
</TABLE>

(b) As of March 1, 2000 there were approximately 154 registered holders of
record of the Registrant's Common Stock.

(c) Reference is made to the information regarding the unregistered sales of
equity securities appearing under Part II, Item 15 of the Registrant's S-1
Registration Statement, which information is incorporated by reference.

CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On December 17, 1999, the Company commenced an initial public offering of
its common stock. The registration statement relating to this offering (File
No. 333-89069) was declared effective on December 16, 1999. The class of
securities registered was common stock. On December 17, 1999, the Company
consummated the offering.

Pursuant to the Registration Statement, the Company registered and sold
4,000,000 shares of its common stock to an underwriting syndicate at an
initial public offering price of $16.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds
of $64 million. FleetBoston Robertson Stephens Inc., SG Cowen Securities
Corporation and Soundview Technology Group, Inc. were the managing
underwriters of the offering. The Company incurred expenses of approximately
$6.2 million, of which approximately $4.5 million represented underwriting
discounts and commissions and approximately $1.7 million represented other
expenses related to the offering. The net proceeds to the Company after total
expenses was approximately $57.8 million. The Company has used, and continues
to expect to use, the proceeds from the sale of stock for general corporate
purposes, including working capital. A portion of the proceeds may also be
used for the acquisitions of businesses that are complimentary to the Company.

14
<PAGE>

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected financial data of the Company for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. The selected
consolidated financial data as of December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 and for
each of the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 are derived from our
consolidated financial statements which have been audited by Arthur Andersen
LLP, our independent public accountants, and are included in Item 8,
"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," including the Notes thereto.
For a more complete understanding of this selected financial data, see Item 7.
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and Item 8 as noted.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Net revenues:
Professional services.............. $ 3,169 $ 5,047 $ 18,579
Educational services............... -- -- 4,094
------------ ------------ ------------
Total net revenues............... 3,169 5,047 22,673
Costs and expenses:
Direct costs of professional
services(1)....................... 2,234 4,974 10,443
Direct costs of educational
services(1)....................... -- -- 1,615
Selling and marketing(1)........... 328 1,530 3,403
General and administrative(1)...... 1,797 2,109 8,034
Compensation expense related to
stock options and warrants........ 28 74 4,345
------------ ------------ ------------
Total operating expenses......... 4,387 8,687 27,840
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss from operations................. (1,218) (3,640) (5,167)
Interest and other income (expense),
net................................. 3 (229) 332
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss............................. $ (1,215) $ (3,869) $ (4,835)
Basic and diluted net loss per
share............................... $ (0.12) $ (0.39) $ (.43)
Basic and diluted weighted average
shares outstanding.................. 10,000 9,992 11,338
- --------
(1) Exclusive of noncash compensation expense related to stock options and
warrants presented separately.

<CAPTION>
December 31,
----------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Working (deficit) capital............ $ (128) $ (3,187) $ 63,670
Total assets......................... 1,797 1,932 74,894
Line of credit....................... -- 2,616 --
Equipment loans and capital lease
obligations......................... -- 294 454
Total stockholders' (deficit)
equity.............................. (1,375) (2,821) 67,112
</TABLE>

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information
contained in the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. This Annual Report on Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The
Company's actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in
the forward-looking statements (See Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements).

15
<PAGE>

Overview

C-bridge Internet Solutions ("C-bridge" or the "Company") is a full service
provider of Internet-based solutions designed to help companies conduct
eBusiness. The Company has experienced consistent revenue growth since its
inception in October of 1996.

The Company's revenues are derived primarily from providing Internet
professional services and it anticipates that revenue growth will be driven
primarily by the number and scope of its client engagements and by the growth
of its professional services headcount. In 1999, the Company earned
professional services revenues from 26 clients. During the year ended December
31, 1999 three professional services clients accounted for approximately 45%
of the Company's total net revenues, while during the year ended December 31,
1998 three professional services clients accounted for approximately 51% of
total net revenues. Revenues from any given client will vary from period to
period; however, the Company expects that significant customer concentration
will continue for the foreseeable future. To the extent that any significant
client uses less of the Company's services or terminates its relationship with
the Company, revenues could decline substantially. In addition, the loss of
any significant client could materially and adversely affect the Company's
business and results of operations.

The Company also generates revenues from providing educational services. In
May 1999, the Company entered into an outsourcing agreement with its primary
sales lead source, CEE, to provide the operational aspects of their executive
education seminars. Under this contract, the Company generates revenues of
approximately $1.4 million a quarter. During 1999, revenues under the CEE
contract were $3.9 million and approximated 17% of total net revenues. Further
discussion of the Company's relationship with CEE can be found in footnote 10
to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
annual report on Form 10-K.

The Company markets and sells its services through the executive education
seminars, indirectly with partners, and directly through its sales
organization. The majority of leads and revenues for 1999 and 1998 have come
through these executive education seminars.

Revenues and earnings may fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on factors
within and outside the Company's control, including the variability in market
demand for the Internet and for Internet professional services, the length of
the sales cycle associated with service offerings, the number and scope of
projects, seasonal factors and the efficiency of utilizing professional
services employees.

For the year ended December 31, 1999, approximately 70% of professional
services revenues were generated pursuant to time and material contracts,
while for the year ended December 31, 1998, approximately 91% of revenues were
derived from time and material contracts. Revenues from time and material
contracts are generally recognized as services are provided. Revenues
generated pursuant to fixed-fee contracts are generally recognized as services
are rendered using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Revenues
exclude reimbursable expenses charged to clients.

Despite a growth in revenues, the Company has not been profitable and
expects to continue to incur net losses. Net losses may not decrease
proportionately with the increase in revenues primarily because of increased
expenses related to the hiring of additional employees, expansion of the
number of offices, increased investment in knowledge management, methodologies
and operations infrastructure, and increased marketing and sales efforts. To
the extent that future revenues do not increase significantly in the same
periods in which operating expenses increase, operating results would be
adversely affected.

The largest portions of the Company's costs result from employee
compensation and the related overhead and facilities costs. The Company
currently expects to continue to grow its headcount. Accordingly, if revenues
do not increase at a rate equal to expenses, the Company's business, financial
condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, liquidity may also be adversely affected if revenues do not
increase at a rate equal to these additional expenses.

16
<PAGE>

Client engagements currently average three to six months in duration. If a
client engagement ends earlier than expected, professional service employees
must be re-deployed and any resulting non-billable time will adversely affect
professional services margins. The Company also expects per capita
professional services costs to increase over time due to wage increases and
inflation. Professional services margins are affected by trends in hiring and
in professional services employee utilization, and, as such, will vary in the
future. Any significant inability to increase billable rates, a decline in
billable rates or time billed to clients or the loss of a significant client
would materially adversely affect professional services margins.

At December 31, 1999, the Company had 249 employees of which 147 were
assigned to professional services operations.

Comparison of the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998

Professional Services Revenues

Professional services revenues increased 268% from $5.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998 to $18.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1999.
The increase reflected growing demand for Internet professional services and
increases in both the size and number of the Company's client engagements. For
the year ended December 31, 1998, professional services revenues from three
clients totaled 51% of total net revenues, while professional services
revenues from three clients totaled 45% of total net revenues for the year
ended December 31, 1999, reflecting continued concentration of revenues from a
small number of clients.

Educational Services Revenues

The Company began providing educational services in May 1999. Educational
services revenues were $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. Of
the $4.1 million of educational services revenues earned in 1999, $3.9 million
were earned through an outsourcing agreement with CEE and represented 17% of
total net revenues for year ended December 31, 1999.

Direct Costs of Professional Services

Direct costs of professional services consist primarily of the compensation
and benefits of employees engaged in the delivery of professional services and
of non-reimbursable project expenses related to client projects. Direct costs
of professional services margins reflect revenues less the professional
services expenses whether or not the employee's time is billed to a client.
Direct costs of professional services increased 110% from $5.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 1998 to $10.4 million for the year ended December 31,
1999. This increase was primarily due to the growth of professional services
headcount to respond to growth and a general increase in wages for
professional services employees. The Company increased its professional
services headcount from 50 at December 31, 1998 to 147 at December 31, 1999.
Direct costs of professional services represented 99% of total net revenues
for the year ended December 31, 1998 and 46% of total net revenues for the
year ended December 31, 1999.

Direct Costs of Educational Services

Direct costs of educational services consist of the salaries, benefits and
direct expenses for personnel related to the Company's educational services.
It also includes the direct expenses of delivering educational services. The
Company started providing educational services in May 1999. Direct costs of
educational services were $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Direct costs of educational services represented 7% of total net revenues for
the year ended December 31, 1999.

17
<PAGE>

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses consist of salaries, commissions, benefits
and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales and marketing activities.
It also includes public relations, trade shows, promotional expenses and other
expenses directly related to sales and marketing. Selling and marketing
expenses increased 122% from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1998
to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. This increase was
primarily due to an increase in selling and marketing headcount, travel
related expenses and an increase in direct expenses related to sales and
marketing programs during 1999. Selling and marketing expenses represented 30%
of total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 1998 and 15% of total
net revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist of compensation, benefits,
related expenses for personnel engaged in executive and general management,
recruiting, human resources, information technology, finance, administrative,
and developing and maintaining the Company's service methodologies. It also
includes expenses for recruiting, training, leasing and maintaining office
space, professional fees and all other general corporate expenses. General and
administrative expenses increased 281% from $2.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 1998 to $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. This
increase was due primarily to an increase in recruiting expenses and an
increase in general and administrative headcount during 1999. General and
administrative expenses represented 42% of total net revenues for the year
ended December 31, 1998 and 35% of total net revenues for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

Compensation Expense Related to Stock Options and Warrants

Compensation expense related to stock options and warrants consists of the
non-cash compensation expense related to the granting of stock options and
warrants. The Company has recorded deferred compensation expense of $9.5
million related to certain stock option grants through December 31, 1999. This
deferred compensation expense is recognized based on the vesting of these
stock options. Of the recorded deferred compensation expense, $4.3 million was
expensed through December 31, 1999. Included in the $4.3 million expense for
1999 was $1.1 million related to certain options whose vesting accelerated
upon the effective date of the Company's initial public offering.

Interest and Other Income

Net interest and other income (expense) changed from an expense of $229,000
for the year ended December 31, 1998 to income of $332,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1999. This change was primarily due to a one-time gain of
$348,000 related to the termination of a joint-venture agreement with a third
party in May 1999 and interest income related to the proceeds from the
Company's initial public offering.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $2.6
million at December 31, 1998 and $3.1 million at December 31, 1999, which may
be used to offset future taxable income, if any. This carryforward is subject
to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service. The
Internal Revenue Code contains provisions that may limit use of the
carryforward in the event there are significant changes in ownership of the
Company. The Company has not given recognition to any potential tax benefits,
consisting primarily of the net operating loss carryforward, as it is more
likely than not that these benefits will not be realizable in future years'
tax returns.

18
<PAGE>

Comparison of the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997

Professional Services Revenues

Professional services revenues increased 59% from $3.2 million for 1997 to
$5.0 million for 1998. The increase in professional services revenues
reflected growing demand for Internet professional services and increases in
both the size and number of client engagements. For the year ended December
31, 1997, three clients totaled 51% of total net revenues, while for the year
ended December 31, 1998, three clients accounted for approximately 51% of
total net revenues.

Direct Costs of Professional Services

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses consist of salaries, commissions, benefits
and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales and marketing activities.
It also includes public relations, trade shows, promotional expenses and other
expenses directly related to sales and marketing. Selling and marketing
expenses increased 367% from $328,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997 to
$1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. As a percent of total net
revenues, selling and marketing expenses represented 10% for the year ended
December 31, 1997 and 30% for the year ended December 31, 1998. This increase
was due primarily to an increase in direct sales and marketing headcount
during the year ended December 31, 1998 and the Company not investing in its
sales and marketing organization until the fourth quarter of the year ended
December 31, 1997.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist of compensation, benefits and
related expenses for personnel engaged in executive and general management,
recruiting, human resources, information technology, finance, administrative,
and developing and maintaining the Company's service methodologies. It also
includes expenses for recruiting, training, leasing and maintaining office
space, professional fees and all other general corporate expenses. General and
administrative expenses increased 17% from $1.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 1997 to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. As a
percent of total net revenues, general and administrative expenses represented
57% for the year ended December 31, 1997 and 42% for the year ended December
31, 1998. General and administrative expenses included significant recruiting
costs for the years-ended December 31, 1997 and 1998. The overall increase in
general and administrative expenses was due primarily to an increase in the
number of employees.

Interest and Other Income

Net interest and other income (expense) changed from income of $3,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997 to an expense of $229,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1998. This increase in expense was related to an increase in
interest expense related to working capital and equipment financing during the
year ended December 31, 1998.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $1.2
million for the year ended December 31, 1997 and $2.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998, which may be used to offset future taxable income, if
any. This carryforward is subject to review and possible adjustment by the
Internal Revenue Service. The Internal Revenue Code contains provisions that
may limit use of the carryforward in the event there are significant changes
in ownership of the Company. The Company has not given recognition to any
potential tax benefits, consisting primarily of the net operating loss
carryforward, as it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be
realizable in future years' tax returns.

19
<PAGE>

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly consolidated
statements of operations of the Company for the years-ended December 31, 1999
and 1998. In the opinion of management, this information has been prepared on
the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this report and includes all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the unaudited
quarterly results when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative
of results of operations for any future period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, June 30, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Mar. 31, June 30, Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations
Data:
Net revenues:
Professional services.. $ 880 $ 973 $1,355 $1,839 $2,441 $3,764 $ 5,137 $ 7,236
Educational services... -- -- -- -- -- 1,029 1,467 1,598
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
Total net revenues..... 880 973 1,355 1,839 2,441 4,793 6,604 8,835
Costs and expenses:
Direct costs of
professional
services(1)........... 1,172 1,034 1,322 1,446 1,527 2,009 2,921 3,987
Direct costs of
educational
services(1)........... -- -- -- -- -- 569 573 473
Selling and
marketing(1).......... 382 625 218 305 413 619 852 1,518
General and
administrative(1)..... 969 231 454 455 685 1,583 2,453 3,313
Compensation expense
related to stock
options and warrants.. -- 50 7 17 -- 425 2,327 1,593
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
Total operating
expenses.............. 2,523 1,940 2001 2,223 2,625 5,205 9,126 10,884
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
Loss from operations.... (1,643) (967) (646) (384) (184) (412) (2,522) (2,049)
Interest and other
income (expense), net.. (9) (50) (106) (64) (71) 291 (33) 145
------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
Net loss................ $(1,652) $(1,017) $ (752) $ (448) $ (255) $ (121) $(2,555) $(1,905)
======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Exclusive of noncash compensation expense related to stock options and
warrants presented separately.

The Company has historically experienced significant quarterly fluctuations
in revenues and results of operations and expects these fluctuations to
continue. Factors causing these variations include the number, timing, scope
and contractual terms of client projects, delays incurred in the performance
of such projects, accuracy of estimates of resources and time required to
complete ongoing projects, and general economic conditions. In addition,
future revenues and results of operations may fluctuate as a result of changes
in pricing in response to client demand and competitive pressures, the ratio
of fixed-price contracts versus time-and-materials contracts and the timing of
collection of accounts receivable. A high percentage of the Company's results
of operations, particularly personnel and rent, are relatively fixed in
advance of any particular quarter. As a result, unanticipated variations in
the number and timing of projects or in professional services employee
utilization rates may cause significant variations in operating results in any
particular quarter, and could result in losses. Any significant shortfall of
revenues in relation to Company expectations, any material reduction in
utilization rates for professional services employees, an unanticipated
termination of a major project, a client's decision not to pursue a new
project or proceed to succeeding stages of a current project, or the
completion during a quarter of several major client projects could require the
Company to pay underutilized employees and have a material adverse effect on
the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

The Company's quarterly results of operations are also subject to certain
seasonal fluctuations. In the past most new professional services employees
have been hired in the Company's second and third quarters, and there has been
a delay in revenues associated with these employees until they become fully
billable. Demand for Company services may be lower in the third and fourth
quarters due to reduced activity during the vacation and holiday seasons and
fewer working days for those customers that curtail operations during these
periods. These and other seasonal factors may contribute to fluctuations in
the Company's results of operations from quarter to quarter.

20
<PAGE>

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, the Company has funded operations through the sale of
equity securities, bank borrowings and lease financing arrangements.

At December 31, 1999, the Company's cash and cash equivalents were $65.3
million. In December 1999, the Company completed its initial public offering
resulting in net proceeds of $57.8 million. In October 1999, the Company sold
shares of Series A convertible preferred stock resulting in net proceeds of
$9.8 million. The Series A convertible preferred stock automatically converted
to common stock upon the completion of the Company's initial public offering.
Based on the current business plan, the Company believes that its current cash
will be sufficient to meet working capital and capital expenditure
requirements at least through the next twelve months. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will not require additional financings within this
time frame or that such additional financing, if needed, will be available on
acceptable terms, if at all.

Cash used in operating activities was $1.4 million the year ended December
31, 1997 and $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Cash provided
by operating activities was $546,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999. For
1997, 1998 and 1999 the Company had capital expenditures of $584,000, $191,000
and $1.9 million, respectively.

Cash provided by the exercise of stock options was $732,000 for the year
ended December 31, 1999, $9,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, and $0
for the year ended December 31, 1997.

The Company's borrowings at December 31, 1999 consist of $454,000 due under
equipment financing obligations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative
instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. It
requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value.
SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137, is effective for all fiscal quarters
of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. SFAS No. 133 is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Derivative Financial Instruments, Other Financial Instruments and Derivative
Commodity Instruments

As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company did not participate in any
derivative financial instruments or other financial and commodity instruments
for which fair market value disclosure would be required under SFAS No. 107.
All of the Company's investments are money market accounts that are carried on
the Company's books at amortized cost, which approximates fair market value.
Accordingly, the Company has no quantitative information concerning the market
risk of participating in such instruments.

Primary Market Risk Exposures

The Company's primary market risk exposure is in the area of interest rate
risk. The Company's investment portfolio of cash and cash equivalents is
subject to interest rate fluctuations, but the Company believes this risk is
immaterial due to the short-term nature of the investments.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

21
<PAGE>

INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants................................. F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1999............. F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
1997, 1998 and 1999..................................................... F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity for the Years
Ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999.................................. F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1997, 1998 and 1999..................................................... F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................... F-7
</TABLE>

F-1
<PAGE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To C-bridge Internet Solutions, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of C-bridge
Internet Solutions, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiary as of
December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' (deficit) equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position
of C-bridge Internet Solutions, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998
and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 19, 2000

F-2
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------------
1998 1999
----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents......................... $ 190,409 $ 65,312,334
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $30,500
and $100,000, respectively....................... 732,765 3,499,356
Unbilled receivables.............................. 451,586 1,792,133
Other current assets.............................. 13,733 584,794
----------- ------------
Total current assets............................ 1,388,493 71,188,617
----------- ------------
Property and Equipment, at cost:
Computer equipment................................ 714,463 1,812,637
Furniture and fixtures............................ 14,044 208,003
Computer software................................. 40,799 965,433
Leasehold improvements............................ -- 40,181
----------- ------------
769,286 3,026,254
Less--Accumulated depreciation and amortization... 226,018 682,536
----------- ------------
543,268 2,343,718
----------- ------------
Other Assets........................................ -- 1,361,326
----------- ------------
Total assets.................................... $ 1,931,761 $ 74,893,661
=========== ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Line of credit.................................... $ 2,615,539 $ --
Current portion of equipment loans and capital
lease obligations................................ 117,716 191,206
Accounts payable.................................. 365,473 2,018,741
Accrued liabilities............................... 979,337 3,431,285
Deferred revenue.................................. 377,107 1,877,628
Due to affiliates................................. 120,610 --
----------- ------------
Total current liabilities....................... 4,575,782 7,518,860
----------- ------------
Equipment Loans and Capital Lease Obligations, net
of current portion................................. 176,575 263,100
----------- ------------
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value--.................
Authorized--5,000,000 shares....................
Issued and outstanding--None.................... -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value--....................
Authorized--50,000,000 shares...................
Issued--10,719,969 and 18,906,258 shares,
respectively................................... 107,200 189,063
Additional paid-in capital........................ 2,685,333 82,394,326
Notes receivable for issuance of common stock..... (84,000) --
Deferred compensation............................. -- (5,107,259)
Accumulated deficit............................... (5,376,129) (10,211,429)
Treasury stock, at cost--510,000 shares........... (153,000) (153,000)
----------- ------------
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity............ (2,820,596) 67,111,701
----------- ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit)
equity......................................... $ 1,931,761 $ 74,893,661
=========== ============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-3
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Revenues:
Professional services................. $ 3,169,183 $ 5,047,474 $18,578,766
Educational services.................. -- -- 4,094,044
----------- ----------- -----------
Total net revenues.................. 3,169,183 5,047,474 22,672,810
----------- ----------- -----------
Costs and Expenses:
Direct costs of professional services
(exclusive of noncash compensation
expense presented below)............. 2,234,598 4,974,586 10,443,351
Direct costs of educational services
(exclusive of noncash compensation
expense presented below)............. -- -- 1,615,523
Selling and marketing (exclusive of
noncash compensation expense
presented below)..................... 327,553 1,530,140 3,402,669
General and administrative (exclusive
of noncash compensation expense
presented below)..................... 1,797,185 2,108,663 8,033,547
Compensation expense related to stock
options and warrants................. 27,984 74,068 4,345,096
----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses............ 4,387,320 8,687,457 27,840,186
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss from operations................ (1,218,137) (3,639,983) (5,167,376)
Interest Expense........................ (5,440) (244,370) (189,506)
Interest Income......................... 8,221 2,433 162,415
Other Income............................ 677 12,964 359,167
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss............................ $(1,214,679) $(3,868,956) $(4,835,300)
=========== =========== ===========
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
(Note 2(g))............................ $ (.12) $ (.39) $ (.43)
=========== =========== ===========
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding..................... 10,000,000 9,991,529 11,338,305
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-4
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Treasury Stock
------------------- Notes -----------------
$0.01 Receivable for Number
Number of Par Additional Issuance of Deferred Accumulated of
Shares Value Paid-in Capital Commom Stock Compensation Deficit Shares Amount
---------- -------- --------------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December
31, 1996......... 10,000,000 $100,000 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (292,494) -- $ --
Issuance of
warrants for
financing....... -- -- 4,070 -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of
stock options to
nonemployees.... -- -- 27,984 -- -- -- -- --
Net loss........ -- -- -- -- -- (1,214,679) -- --
---------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------ ------- ---------
Balance, December
31, 1997......... 10,000,000 100,000 32,054 -- -- (1,507,173) -- --
Issuance of
common stock for
notes
receivable...... 280,000 2,800 81,200 (84,000) -- -- -- --
Compensation
expense
associated with
issuance of
common stock for
notes
receivable...... -- -- 43,098 -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of
common stock for
services
rendered........ 45,000 450 13,050 -- -- -- -- --
Exercise of
stock options... 193,038 1,931 6,814 -- -- -- -- --
Purchase of
treasury stock.. -- -- -- -- -- -- 510,000 (153,000)
Issuance of
common stock on
conversion of
bridge
financing....... 201,931 2,019 58,560 -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of
warrants for
financing....... -- -- 99,018 -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of a
warrant in
connection with
joint venture... -- -- 22,703 -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of
stock options to
nonemployees.... -- -- 17,470 -- -- -- -- --
Forgiveness of
debt to
affiliates...... -- -- 2,311,366 -- -- -- -- --
Net loss........ -- -- -- -- -- (3,868,956) -- --
---------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------ ------- ---------
Balance, December
31, 1998......... 10,719,969 107,200 2,685,333 (84,000) -- (5,376,129) 510,000 (153,000)
Sale of common
stock........... 333,333 3,333 1,996,667 -- -- -- -- --
Initial public
offering of
common stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$6,181,512...... 4,000,000 40,000 57,778,488 -- -- -- -- --
Conversion of
Series A
redeemable
convertible
preferred stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$85,005......... 1,645,555 16,456 9,771,869 -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of
common stock
upon exercise of
warrants, net of
shares
forfeited....... 195,126 1,951 (1,951) -- -- -- -- --
Repayment of
notes
receivable...... -- -- -- 84,000 -- -- -- --
Exercise of
stock options... 2,012,275 20,123 711,565 -- -- -- -- --
Deferred
compensation
related to the
issuance of
stock options to
employees and
nonemployees.... -- -- 9,452,355 -- (9,452,355) -- -- --
Amortization of
deferred
compensation.... -- -- -- -- 4,345,096 -- -- --
Net loss........ -- -- -- -- -- (4,835,300) -- --
---------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------ ------- ---------
Balance, December
31, 1999......... 18,906,258 $189,063 $82,394,326 $ -- $(5,107,259) $(10,211,429) 510,000 $(153,000)
========== ======== =========== ======== =========== ============ ======= =========
<CAPTION>
Total
Stockholders'
(Deficit) Equity
----------------
<S> <C>
Balance, December
31, 1996......... $ (192,494)
Issuance of
warrants for
financing....... 4,070
Issuance of
stock options to
nonemployees.... 27,984
Net loss........ (1,214,679)
----------------
Balance, December
31, 1997......... (1,375,119)
Issuance of
common stock for
notes
receivable...... --
Compensation
expense
associated with
issuance of
common stock for
notes
receivable...... 43,098
Issuance of
common stock for
services
rendered........ 13,500
Exercise of
stock options... 8,745
Purchase of
treasury stock.. (153,000)
Issuance of
common stock on
conversion of
bridge
financing....... 60,579
Issuance of
warrants for
financing....... 99,018
Issuance of a
warrant in
connection with
joint venture... 22,703
Issuance of
stock options to
nonemployees.... 17,470
Forgiveness of
debt to
affiliates...... 2,311,366
Net loss........ (3,868,956)
----------------
Balance, December
31, 1998......... (2,820,596)
Sale of common
stock........... 2,000,000
Initial public
offering of
common stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$6,181,512...... 57,818,488
Conversion of
Series A
redeemable
convertible
preferred stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$85,005......... 9,788,325
Issuance of
common stock
upon exercise of
warrants, net of
shares
forfeited....... --
Repayment of
notes
receivable...... 84,000
Exercise of
stock options... 731,688
Deferred
compensation
related to the
issuance of
stock options to
employees and
nonemployees.... --
Amortization of
deferred
compensation.... 4,345,096
Net loss........ (4,835,300)
----------------
Balance, December
31, 1999......... $67,111,701
================
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-5
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss............................... $(1,214,679) $(3,868,956) $(4,835,300)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities--
Depreciation and amortization.......... 75,871 249,738 456,518
Noncash stock based compensation....... 27,984 74,068 4,345,096
Noncash interest expense related to
warrants.............................. 4,070 121,721 --
Repayment of debt by third party....... -- -- (348,000)
Changes in current assets and
liabilities--
Accounts receivable................... (871,832) 139,067 (2,766,591)
Unbilled receivables.................. (217,509) (234,077) (1,340,547)
Other current assets.................. (168,235) 154,502 (571,061)
Accounts payable...................... 467,270 (101,797) 1,653,268
Accrued liabilities................... 306,039 598,649 2,451,948
Deferred revenue...................... 192,959 184,148 1,500,521
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities................ (1,398,062) (2,682,937) 545,852
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchases of property and equipment.... (584,135) (191,400) (1,924,122)
Increase in other assets............... -- -- (1,361,326)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing
activities.......................... (584,135) (191,400) (3,285,448)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net proceeds (repayments) of debt...... -- 2,615,539 (2,204,317)
Proceeds from issuance of bridge
loans................................. -- 248,600 --
Payments of bridge loans............... -- (193,750) --
Increase in due to affiliates.......... 2,012,896 1,214,586 --
Repayment of due to affiliates......... -- (988,000) (245,007)
Proceeds from sale lease back
transaction........................... -- 337,036 --
Payments on capital lease obligations.. -- (55,709) (111,656)
Loan to employee....................... -- (153,000) --
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net
of issuance costs..................... -- -- 59,818,488
Proceeds from the sale of Series A
redeemable convertible preferred
stock, net of issuance costs.......... -- -- 9,788,325
Proceeds from repayment of notes
receivable............................ -- -- 84,000
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options............................... -- 8,745 731,688
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing
activities.......................... 2,012,896 3,034,047 67,861,521
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Increase in Cash and Cash
Equivalents............................ 30,699 159,710 65,121,925
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of
Year................................... -- 30,699 190,409
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year.. $ 30,699 $ 190,409 $65,312,334
=========== =========== ===========
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash
Financing Activities:
Conversion of Series A redeemable
convertible preferred stock into
common stock.......................... $ -- $ -- $ 9,788,325
=========== =========== ===========
Issuance of common stock for notes
receivable............................ $ -- $ 84,000 $ --
=========== =========== ===========
Assets acquired under capital lease.... $ -- $ -- $ 99,449
=========== =========== ===========
Assets acquired in connection with
outsourcing agreement................. $ -- $ -- $ 233,397
=========== =========== ===========
Purchase of treasury stock by forgiving
loan to employee...................... $ -- $ 153,000 $ --
=========== =========== ===========
Conversion of bridge financing and
related interest to common stock...... $ -- $ 60,579 $ --
=========== =========== ===========
Forgiveness of debt due to affiliates.. $ -- $ 2,311,366 $ --
=========== =========== ===========
Noncash exercise of warrants........... $ -- $ -- $ 1,951
=========== =========== ===========
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information:
Cash paid during the year for
interest.............................. $ -- $ 93,095 $ 186,351
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements

F-6
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) OPERATIONS

C-bridge Internet Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) is a full
service provider of eBusiness solutions that help companies create strategic
business solutions through the use of Internet technologies. In May 1999, the
Company began offering eBusiness educational services.

The Company is subject to risks common to rapidly growing technology-based
service companies, including a limited operating history, the need to attract
and retain key personnel, rapid technological change, competition from larger
service providers, and the need for successful development and marketing of
services.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application
of the following significant accounting policies, as discussed below and
elsewhere in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(a) Management's Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(b) Principles of Consolidation

In August 1998, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, C-bridge
Packaged Solutions, Inc. (CPS). These consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and CPS. All significant intercompany
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company generates revenue from eBusiness consulting and education
services. Revenues from consulting contracts are recognized on a time-and-
material or percentage-of-completion basis depending upon the contract with
the customer. Revenues related to time and material consulting contracts are
recognized when the services are performed. Revenues related to fixed price
consulting contracts are recognized based on the percent of the cost incurred
compared to the total estimated cost to complete the project. The cumulative
impact of any revisions in estimates are reflected in the period in which they
become known. If a consulting contract is estimated to result in a loss, the
loss is recorded immediately. Net revenues exclude reimbursable expenses
charged to customers.

Revenues from educational services are recognized based upon the management
and performance of educational services. The Company recognizes revenue based
upon the performance of services under a five-year outsourcing agreement with
a third party. In accordance with the outsourcing agreement, the Company
manages and performs executive education in exchange for a monthly fee of
approximately $479,000 per month. The Company records such fee as revenue
ratably over the term of the contract. Costs incurred in performing such
services are expensed as incurred. See Note 10 for further discussion of the
outsourcing agreement.

Unbilled receivables represent services that have been performed but have
not yet been billed. Unbilled receivables also include reimbursable expenses.
Deferred revenues represent amounts billed or paid in advance of revenues
recognized.

F-7
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company accounts for investments under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash
equivalents. At December 31, 1999, cash equivalents consisted primarily of
money market funds.

(e) Depreciation and Amortization

The Company provides for depreciation and amortization using the straight-
line method, by charges to operations in amounts estimated to allocate the
cost of property and equipment over their estimated useful lives, as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Asset Classification Useful Life
-------------------- -------------
<S> <C>
Computer equipment............. 3 years
Furniture, and fixtures........ 3 years
Computer software.............. 3 years
Leasehold improvements......... Life of lease
</TABLE>

The Company has assets under capital leases of $350,000 and $421,626 as of
December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively. Accumulated depreciation related to
these assets is $48,611 and $165,278 as of December 31, 1998 and 1999,
respectively.

(f) Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist of
cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company maintains the
majority of its cash balances with financial institutions. Concentrations of
credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited to certain
customers to whom the Company makes substantial sales. To reduce risk, the
Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and, as a
consequence, believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure is
limited. The Company operates in two industry segments and derives
substantially all of its revenues from domestic customers.

The following table summarizes the number of customers that individually
comprise greater than 10% of total revenues and accounts receivable for the
periods presented:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue--
Customer A................................ 28% 10% *
Customer B................................ 12 * *
Customer C................................ 11 * *
Customer D................................ * 25 23%
Customer E................................ * 16 *
Customer F................................ * * 12
Customer G................................ * * 10
Customer L................................ * * 17
</TABLE>

F-8
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accounts Receivable--
Customer A................................ 32% * *
Customer D................................ * * 23%
Customer E................................ * 29% *
Customer F................................ * 16 *
Customer H................................ * 33 *
Customer I................................ 19 * *
Customer J................................ 10 * *
Customer K................................ * * 16
</TABLE>
- --------
*Less than 10%.

(g) Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net
loss per common share is the same as basic net loss per common share, since
the effects of the Company's potentially dilutive securities are antidilutive.
Antidilutive securities, which consist of options and warrants to purchase
common stock that are not included in diluted net loss per share, were
1,653,010, 8,308,138 and 8,018,400 as of December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999,
respectively.

(h) Stock-Based Compensation for Employees

The Company has adopted SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. SFAS No. 123 defines a fair-value-based method of accounting for
employee stock options and other stock-based compensation. Compensation
expense related to employee stock based compensation arising from this method
of accounting can be reflected in the financial statements or, alternatively,
the pro forma net loss and loss per share effect of the fair-value-based
accounting can be disclosed in the financial footnotes. The Company has
adopted the disclosure-only alternative (see Note 7(e)).

(i) Comprehensive Income

SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, requires companies to report
comprehensive income as a measure of overall performance. Comprehensive income
includes all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners. For the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, the Company's comprehensive loss is the same
as its reported net loss.

(j) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and debt. The estimated fair value of these instruments
approximates their carrying value.

(k) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

F-9
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

(3) ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1998 1999
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Accrued payroll and other related employee benefits.... $204,416 $1,025,027
Accrued financing costs................................ -- 500,000
Other accrued liabilities.............................. 774,921 1,906,258
-------- ----------
$979,337 $3,431,285
======== ==========
</TABLE>

(4) INCOME TAXES

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
whereby a deferred tax asset or liability is measured by enacted tax rates.

The approximate tax effect of each type of temporary difference and
carryforward as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively, is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------
1998 1999
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Net operating loss carryforwards................... $ 1,036,697 $ 1,240,477
Depreciation and amortization...................... (6,119) (52,655)
Other.............................................. 59,080 56,317
----------- -----------
1,089,658 1,244,139
Less--Valuation allowance.......................... (1,089,658) (1,244,139)
----------- -----------
$ -- $ --
=========== ===========
</TABLE>

The Company has not given recognition to any of its potential tax benefits,
consisting primarily of its net operating loss carryforwards, in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, as it is more likely than not
that these benefits will not be realizable in future years' tax returns.

At December 31, 1998 and 1999, the Company had available a net operating
loss carryforward of approximately $2,574,000 and $3,080,000, respectively,
which expires through 2019. This carryforward is subject to review and
possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service. The Internal Revenue Code
(IRC) contains provisions that may limit the Company's use of the carryforward
in the event that there are significant changes in the ownership, as defined
in Section 382 of the IRC.

(5) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(a) Operating Leases

From October 1996 to April 1999, the Company leased certain office space and
equipment from a related party, Cambridge Technology Group, under month-to-
month operating lease agreements. Included in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999
is rent expense of approximately $93,000, $251,000 and $156,000, respectively,
related to this lease.

F-10
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

On May 1, 1999, the Company entered into a five-year operating lease
agreement for its principal office space from Property Management Partners,
Inc. (PMP), a corporation controlled by a former employee of Cambridge
Technology Group. Aside from the monthly base rent, a one-time sum of
$1,375,000 was paid to the lessor in November 1999. This amount is to be used
for certain capital improvements or material repairs as needed. The Company is
amortizing this one-time charge to operations over the lease term. Concurrent
with the operating lease, the Company entered into a five-year facilities
management agreement with PMP. Monthly payments of $23,333 are paid for the
management, operations and maintenance of the leased facilities. The Company
believes these transactions were at arm's-length.

The approximate future minimum annual rent and management fees due under the
operating lease agreement as of December 31, 1999 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total
----------
<S> <C>
2000.............................. $1,092,000
2001.............................. 901,000
2002.............................. 888,000
2003.............................. 895,000
2004.............................. 300,000
----------
$4,076,000
==========
</TABLE>

(b) Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is party to various types of
litigation. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to all claims
and, in its opinion, all litigation currently pending or threatening will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial
position or consolidated results of operations.

(6) DEBT OBLIGATIONS

(a) Due to Affiliates

During 1998, the Company was financed by advances from parties affiliated
with the Company. These affiliates consist of Cambridge Technology Group and
trusts that are significant stockholders of the Company. Amounts due to these
affiliates, which consisted primarily of working capital advances, general and
administrative allocations, and operating expenses, were approximately
$1,094,000 in 1998. During March and May of 1998, the Company entered into
agreements with the affiliated parties to formally forgive $2,311,366 of the
amounts due. The Company recorded the forgiveness as a capital contribution,
as reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The
remaining $988,000 was repaid in 1998.

(b) Lines of Credit

During 1998, the Company had a $1,500,000 revolving line of credit with a
bank secured by substantially all business assets and guaranteed by major
stockholders of the Company. Interest was at the bank's prime rate plus 1%. In
September 1998, the Company secured a new line of credit with a different
bank, paying down and terminating the original bank debt.

Under the new line of credit, which expired on December 31, 1999, the
Company was able to draw up to $3,500,000 based on certain terms and
conditions. Of the total amount available under the new line of credit,
$1,000,000 was collateralized by assets of the Company and $2,500,000 was
guaranteed by a major stockholder

F-11
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

of the Company and a trust for the benefit of a major stockholder of the
Company. A warrant to purchase 65,000 shares of common stock was issued to the
bank in connection with the new line of credit (see Note 7(f)). Borrowings
under the new line of credit bore interest at prime (8.50% at December 31,
1999) plus 1%. At December 31, 1998 $2,200,000, was outstanding under the line
of credit and $300,000 was available under the line of credit based on the
terms and conditions of the borrowing base. The Company and the guarantors
were subject to certain restrictive covenants in connection with the line of
credit.

On April 7, 1999, the Company entered into a loan modification of the new
line of credit in order for the Company to be able to draw upon a committed
equipment line of credit (Equipment Line) up to $200,000. The Equipment Line
was to be used to purchase or refinance certain operating equipment, as
defined. The Equipment Line bore interest at the bank's prime rate (8.50% at
December 31, 1999) plus 1.5% and is secured by the same guarantees as the
original line of credit. Amounts borrowed under the Equipment Line between
January and June 1999 were converted to a term loan to be paid back over a 36-
month period beginning July 5, 1999 and amounts borrowed between July and
December 1999 were converted to a term loan to be paid back over a 36-month
period beginning January 5, 2000. Borrowings under the Equipment Line need to
be in compliance with certain financial covenants that the Company was in
compliance with at December 31, 1999. At December 31, 1999, $172,222 was
outstanding under the Equipment Line.

Maturities of the Equipment Line term loans as of December 31, 1999 are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total
--------
<S> <C>
2000................................ $ 66,667
2001................................ 66,667
2002................................ 38,888
--------
$172,222
========
</TABLE>

In September 1998, CPS obtained a $2,000,000 line of credit with a bank
collateralized by a letter of credit issued by a third-party joint venture
partner (see Note 8). A warrant, recorded at fair value, was issued to this
third party in connection with the letter of credit (see Note 7(f)).
Borrowings under this line of credit bore interest at prime (7.75% at December
31, 1998). At December 31, 1998, $415,539 was outstanding under this line. As
discussed in Note 8, during 1999, the joint venture was dissolved, CPS' line
of credit was paid down and the line of credit and warrant were terminated.

In July 1998, the Company entered into a sale/leaseback transaction, whereby
the Company sold existing fixed assets (primarily computer equipment) with a
net book value of approximately $250,000 to a leasing company for $350,000.
The Company then leased the fixed assets from the leasing company under a
three-year capital lease arrangement. The gain of approximately $100,000 was
deferred and is being amortized to other income over the term of the lease.

F-12
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

As of December 31, 1999, payments due pursuant to capital lease obligations
are approximately as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount
--------
<S> <C>
2000................................ $170,248
2001................................ 151,108
--------
321,356
Less--Amount representing interest.. 39,272
--------
Present value of minimum lease
payments......................... 282,084
Less--Current portion............... 124,539
--------
Long-term portion................. $157,545
========
</TABLE>

(d) Bridge Loans Payable

In May 1998, the Company entered into short-term financing agreements with
three investors totaling approximately $248,000. Interest on the notes was at
prime (7.75% at December 31, 1998) plus 1%. The terms were for 90 days and
included issuance of warrants, which were recorded at fair value (see Note
7(f)). One party, representing approximately $148,000 of this amount, is a
related party. On August 3, 1998, the due date of the bridge loans was
extended from July 29, 1998 to September 21, 1998. Additional warrants were
issued in connection with the extension (see Note 7 (f)). In late September
1998, approximately $194,000 of the total amount was paid in full and the
remaining amount due, $54,000 along with related accrued interest, was
converted into approximately 202,000 shares of common stock at $.30 per share.

(7) STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY

(a) Initial Public Offering

On December 17, 1999, the Company completed an initial public offering (IPO)
of 4,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $16.00 per share,
resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $57,800,000. In
January 2000, the underwriters of the Company's IPO exercised their over-
allotment option and purchased 600,000 shares of the Company's common stock at
$16.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately
$8,908,000.

(b) Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $.01
par value, 1,850,000 of which are designated as Series A redeemable
convertible preferred stock (Series A Preferred Stock).

In October 1999, the Company sold 1,645,555 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock at a purchase price of $6.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds to the
Company of approximately $9.8 million. Concurrent with the sale of the Series
A Preferred Stock, two significant stockholders of the Company sold an
aggregate of 819,445 shares of common stock to certain of the Series A
Preferred Stock investors at a purchase price per share of $6.00, resulting in
proceeds to the stockholders of approximately $4.9 million. In conjunction
with the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Company amended its
Articles of Incorporation to change the par value of the Company's common
stock to $.01 per share. The Company's par value of common stock has been
retroactively adjusted for this amendment. The Series A Preferred Stock
automatically converted into common stock upon completion of the Company's
IPO. The rights, preferences and privileges of the Series A Preferred Stock
are listed below.

F-13
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

Dividends

The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive
noncumulative dividends of 8% per annum, payable only when, as and if declared
by the Board of Directors. The Company shall not declare or pay any dividends
on shares of common stock until the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock
then outstanding first receive an amount equal to 8% per annum of the original
purchase price. The Company did not declare any dividends on the Series A
Preferred Stock.

Conversion

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock converted into one share of common
stock.

Voting Rights

The Series A Preferred stockholders were entitled to vote on all matters
with the common stockholders as one class of stock. The Series A Preferred
stockholders were entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of
shares of common stock into which each share of the Series A Preferred Stock
was then convertible.

Liquidation

In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the corporation including a sale or merger of the Company, as
defined, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding were
entitled to be paid an amount equal to $6.00 per share, adjusted for certain
dilutive events, as defined, plus any dividends declared but unpaid on such
shares prior to any payment to common stockholders.

Redemption Rights

The Company was required to redeem by October 2006, subject to certain
conditions, the Series A Preferred Stock, at a price equal to $6.00 per share
plus any dividends declared but unpaid from the original issue date to the
mandatory redemption date per share.

The Company has reserved 9,324,131 shares of common stock to be issued upon
exercise of stock options and warrants and for issuance under the Company's
employee stock purchase plan as of December 31, 1999.

(d) Notes Receivable for Issuance of Common Stock

In May 1998, in connection with the employment of an employee, the Company
issued 280,000 shares of common stock to a party related to the employee in
exchange for a note receivable in the amount of $84,000. The Company accounted
for this transaction as a variable stock award and recorded a compensation
charge of $43,098 in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 1998. On January 1, 1999, the Company received
full recourse rights for this note receivable, thereby fixing the measurement
date and no additional compensation was required to be recorded. This note was
due on May 20, 2002 and bore interest at 5.7%. In addition to full recourse
rights, the loan was collateralized by the 280,000 shares of common stock. The
note was paid in full in November 1999.

F-14
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

(e) Stock Option Plans

1997 Stock Incentive Plan

In 1997, the Company implemented a Stock Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan),
pursuant to which 4,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for stock
options, stock grants and other stock-based awards. Issuances under the 1997
Plan generally expire 10 years from issue date. Under the 1997 Plan, the
Company may grant both incentive stock options and nonstatutory options, as
well as award or sell shares of common stock to employees, directors or
consultants of the Company. All option grants, prices and vesting periods are
determined by the Board of Directors. All options issued prior to March 1998
generally vest monthly. All options issued after March 1998 generally vest
semiannually. However, certain option grants contain provisions to accelerate
vesting upon defined events. Full vesting of all options occurs four years
after date of issuance. As of December 31, 1999, there are 198,148 shares
available for future grant under the 1997 plan.

1999 Stock Incentive Plan

In February 1999, the Board of Directors approved the 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan (the 1999 Plan), pursuant to which 6,000,000 shares of common stock were
reserved for stock options, stock grants and other stock-based awards. The
number of shares of common stock made available and reserved shall
automatically increase by 500,000 shares effective on the first day of every
calendar year for the next 10 years. Issuances under the 1999 Plan generally
expire 10 years from issue date. Under the 1999 Plan, the Company may grant
both incentive stock options and nonstatutory options, as well as award or
sell shares of common stock to employees, directors or consultants of the
Company. All option grants, prices and vesting are determined by the Board of
Directors. Options generally vest semiannually from date of grant. However,
certain option grants contain provisions to accelerate vesting upon defined
events. Full vesting of all options occurs four years after date of issuance.
As of December 31, 1999, there are 157,583 shares available for future grant
under the 1999 Plan.

1999 Director Stock Option Plan

In November 1999, the Board of Directors approved the 1999 Director Stock
Option Plan (the Director Plan), pursuant to which 200,000 shares of common
stock have been reserved for stock option awards. The Director Plan allows for
eligible directors to receive options to purchase 30,000 shares upon election
to the Board of Directors, which vest in three equal installments beginning on
the first anniversary of the grant date. In addition, eligible directors are
entitled to options to purchase 15,000 shares annually on the date of each
annual stockholders meeting. These options are 100% vested upon grant. Option
grants under the Director Plan are at not less than fair market value on the
date of grant. As of December 31, 1999, there are 200,000 shares available for
future grant under the Director Plan.

1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In November 1999, the Board of Directors approved the 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the ESPP), in compliance with Section 423 of the IRC. Employees
who have completed three consecutive months of employment with the Company and
who are employed with the Company on the first day of the applicable plan
period are eligible to participate in the ESPP. The ESPP allows participants
to purchase common stock of the Company at 85% of the fair market value, as
defined. The Company may issue up to 750,000 shares under the ESPP. As of
December 31, 1999, there are 750,000 shares available for future grant under
the ESPP.

F-15
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

Stock option activity under the 1997 Plan, the 1999 Plan and the Director
Plan is summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
Average
Exercise Exercise
Number of Price per Price per
Shares Share Share
---------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding December 1, 1996............... -- $ -- $ --
Granted.................................. 1,611,000 0.01-0.30 0.20
Canceled................................. (2,990) 0.25-0.30 0.29
---------- ----------- -----
Outstanding December 31, 1997.............. 1,608,010 0.01-0.30 0.20
Granted.................................. 3,212,128 0.30 0.30
Exercised................................ (193,038) 0.01-0.30 0.05
Canceled................................. (1,101,739) 0.01-0.30 0.27
---------- ----------- -----
Outstanding, December 3l, 1998............. 3,525,361 0.01-0.30 0.28
Granted.................................. 6,255,092 0.30-48.63 3.84
Exercised................................ (2,012,275) 0.01-1.00 0.36
Canceled................................. (329,222) 0.01-6.00 1.56
---------- ----------- -----
Outstanding, December 31, 1999............. 7,438,956 $0.01-48.63 $3.23
========== =========== =====
Exercisable, December 31, 1999............. 1,508,576 $ 0.01-8.50 $0.43
========== =========== =====
Exercisable, December 31, 1998............. 671,842 $ 0.01-0.30 $0.25
========== =========== =====
Exercisable, December 31, 1997............. 262,771 $ 0.01-0.30 $0.06
========== =========== =====
</TABLE>

The following table summarizes information relating to currently outstanding
and exercisable options as of December 31, 1999.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Outstanding Exercisable
----------- -----------
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Exercise Number of Life Number of
Prices Shares (in Years) Shares
-------- --------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
$ .01 70,900 7.29 29,103
.25 325,505 7.69 106,766
.30 3,230,491 8.89 1,084,490
1.00 1,257,068 9.40 287,001
6.00 978,750 9.68 --
8.50 1,057,917 9.88 1,216
12.50 511,575 9.96 --
48.63 6,750 10.00 --
--------- ---------
7,438,956 1,508,576
========= =========
</TABLE>

During 1997, 1998 and 1999, the Company issued options to purchase 239,000,
104,000 and 408,842 shares, respectively, of common stock to nonemployees in
exchange for services. The Company recorded these transactions at fair value,
which was $27,984, $17,470 and $881,592 for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1998 and 1999, respectively. Certain options to purchase common stock to
nonemployees have been issued with various vesting periods ranging from
immediate vesting to a four-year vesting period. The compensation expense

F-16
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

related to these stock options is recorded over the related vesting period and
is subject to variable plan accounting treatment whereby the Company will
remeasure the fair value of the options at the end of each reporting period
until the options are fully vested.

During the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company issued options to
purchase approximately 1,577,000 shares of common stock to employees at an
exercise price deemed to be below market value. In accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
25), the Company has recorded the difference between the exercise price and
fair value as deferred compensation and it is amortizing such deferred
compensation to operations over the vesting periods of the options.

The Company has computed the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No.
123 for options granted to employees using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model prescribed by SFAS No. 123. The assumptions used and the weighted
average information for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, are
as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk-free interest rates.................. 5.83-6.57% 4.39-5.59% 4.88-6.06%
Expected dividend yield................... -- -- --
Expected life............................. 5 years 5 years 5 years
Expected volatility....................... 60% 60% 60%
Weighted average fair value per share of
options granted.......................... $.05 $.07 $2.45
Weighted-average remaining contractual
life of options outstanding.............. 9.65 years 9.39 years 9.23 years
</TABLE>

Had compensation expense from the Company's stock option plan been
determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, net loss and net loss per share would
have been approximately as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss--
As reported....................... $(1,214,679) $(3,868,956) $(4,835,300)
Pro forma......................... (1,227,071) (3,990,032) (7,283,758)
Basic and diluted net loss per
share--
As reported....................... $ (.12) $ (.39) $ (.43)
Pro forma......................... (.12) (.40) (.64)
</TABLE>

(f) Warrants

In September 1997, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 45,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share to a bank in connection
with borrowings of a related party, Cambridge Technology Group, that were used
to fund the Company's operations. In December 1999, the bank exercised the
warrant through a cash-less exercise by forfeiting warrants to purchase 989
shares of the 45,000 shares for a net exercise of 44,011 shares.

In connection with a May 1998 bridge financing (see Note 6(d)), the Company
issued warrants to purchase 333,334 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $.30 per share. Each share of common stock purchased by the exercise
of the warrants may be exchanged for a proportional amount of the Company's
preferred stock, if any is issued, based upon the number of common stock
shares multiplied by $.30 per share divided by $1.19 for each share of
preferred stock. In October 1999, warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of
common stock were exercised through a cashless exercise by forfeiting warrants
to purchase 5,000 of the 100,000 shares for a net exercise of 95,000 shares.

F-17
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

In May 1998, the Company issued a warrant to a customer to purchase 110,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 based upon achievement of
certain revenue milestones by May 2000; accordingly, the accounting
measurement date was unknown. In September 1999, the Company amended the
warrant agreement to fully vest the warrant. In conjunction with the
amendment, the Company recorded the value of this warrant as a charge to
operations in the year ended December 31, 1999.

In June 1998, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share in connection with a line
of credit entered into with a bank. In December 1999, the bank exercised the
warrant through a cashless exercise by forfeiting the option to purchase 551
shares of the 25,000 shares for a net exercise of 24,449 shares.

In connection with a capital lease in July 1998 (see Note 6(c)), the Company
issued a warrant to the lessor to purchase 93,333 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $.30 per share. The warrant expires in December 2002.

In August 1998, in connection with the guarantee of a line of credit for the
joint venture discussed in Note 8, a warrant was issued to the third-party
partner in the joint venture to purchase 4,000,000 shares of the CPS' common
stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Company recorded the
issuance of this warrant at fair value, which totaled $22,703, as interest
expense. As discussed in Note 8, the joint venture was terminated and the
warrant was canceled.

In August 1998, the May 1998 bridge financing (see Note 6(d)) was extended
and additional warrants to purchase 111,110 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $.30 per share were issued to the investors. Each share of
common stock purchased by the exercise of the warrants may be exchanged for a
proportional amount of the Company's preferred stock, if any is issued, based
upon a similar determination as the original warrants. In October 1999,
warrants to purchase 33,333 shares of common stock were exercised through a
cashless exercise by forfeiting warrants to purchase 1,667 shares of the
33,333 shares for a net exercise of 31,666 shares.

In September 1998, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 65,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share to a bank in connection
with a line of credit. This warrant is outstanding and fully exercisable as of
December 31, 1999.

The following table summarizes warrants outstanding as of December 31, 1999.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Values
Ascribed to Year
Grant Date Shares Exercise Price Expiration Warrant Recorded
- ---------- ------ -------------- ---------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May 1998 233,334 $ .30 per share May 2003 $ 39,679 1998
May 1998 110,000 $1.00 May 2000 660,000 1999
July 1998 93,333 $ .30 per share December 2002 15,850 1998
August 1998 77,777 $ .30 per share August 2003 13,165 1998
September 1998 65,000 $1.00 per share September 2003 5,159 1998
------- --------
579,444 $733,853
======= ========
</TABLE>

At December 31, 1999, all outstanding warrants are exercisable. An equal
number of shares of common stock have been reserved for the exercise of all
outstanding warrants. The Company recorded the issuance of these warrants at
fair value using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The value ascribed to
warrants issued in connection with debt financing has been charged to interest
expense. The value ascribed to warrants issued in connection with services has
been charged to operations.

F-18
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

(g) Treasury Stock

In April 1998, the Company reacquired 510,000 shares of its common stock in
satisfaction of a loan previously made to a former officer in the amount of
$153,000 in connection with his severance agreement. Severance in the amount
of approximately $56,000 was also owed to the former officer, as per the
severance agreement, and was paid in full during 1998.

(8) SUBSIDIARY AND JOINT VENTURE

In connection with the formation of CPS, the Company and CPS entered into a
joint venture with a third-party provider of packaged solution software. The
joint venture engaged CPS as the vehicle to develop and implement Web-based
solutions and services. Under the agreement of the joint venture, CPS issued a
warrant (see Note 7(f)) to the third-party provider to purchase up to 40% of
CPS on a fully diluted basis in exchange for a letter of credit guarantee on
CPS' line of credit.

In May 1999, the Company, CPS and the third party that formed the joint
venture terminated the arrangement and dissolved the joint venture. In
connection with the dissolution of the joint venture, the third party and the
Company paid down approximately $239,000 and $310,000, respectively, of the
outstanding line of credit and terminated the line of credit arrangement. The
warrants issued to the third party were also canceled. Additionally,
approximately $70,000 owed by CPS to the third party was forgiven. The Company
has recorded the debt forgiveness by the third party as other income in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations during the year ended
December 31, 1999.

(9) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company has a 401(k) plan (the 401(k) Plan) covering substantially all
employees of the Company who meet certain defined requirements. Under the
terms of the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to make tax-deferred
contributions and the Company may match 25% of the first 6% of employee
contributions as determined by the Board of Directors and may make other
discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan. During 1998 and 1999, the
Company contributed approximately $46,400 and $88,600, respectively, to the
401(k) Plan. The Company made no contributions during 1997.

(10) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On April 30, 1999, the Company entered into a five-year contract with a
third party, CEE, Inc. (CEE), whereby CEE outsourced the management and
performance of executive education seminars to the Company in exchange for a
monthly fee of approximately $479,000 per month. In accordance with the
outsourcing agreement, the Company agreed to issue options to purchase 190,000
shares of the Company's common stock to designees of CEE and is committed to
issue options to purchase an additional 50,000 shares of the Company's common
stock at fair value the date the options are issued to CEE's designees each
year that the outsourcing agreement is in place. A sister company of CEE named
Cambridge Executive Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises) previously provided these
services. Simultaneous with signing the outsourcing arrangement, the Company
hired substantially all of Enterprises' employees, assumed Enterprises' real
estate lease and acquired all of Enterprises' tangible assets (primarily
furniture, computers and leasehold improvements), in exchange for a note
payable to Enterprises for approximately $234,000. The note payable to
Enterprises was paid in full in October 1999.

On May 1, 1999, the Company granted to designees of CEE options to purchase
189,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, 71,500
of which were granted to employees of CEE that remained in the employ of CEE.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 96-18,
Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction

F-19
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

with Selling, Goods or Services, the Company recorded a charge to operations
of $199,000 related to this grant. As a result of the outsourcing agreement,
certain employees of CEE became employees of C-bridge on May 1, 1999. These
employees represent the remaining CEE designees. The Company granted these
employees options to purchase 118,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $1.00 per share, which was deemed to be less than fair market value
on the date of grant. In accordance with APB 25, the Company recorded deferred
compensation of $590,000 which is being amortized to operations over the
vesting period of the employees' options.

Upon the issuance of options to purchase the additional 50,000 shares of the
Company's common stock to CEE designees each year, the Company will record a
charge to operations in accordance with SFAS No. 123.

The Company, CEE and Enterprises have a historical business relationship
through Cambridge Technology Group (CTG). For more than 10 years prior to
September 1998, CTG conducted an executive seminar business. In September
1998, CTG made an assignment for the benefit of creditors. The sole
stockholder, director and officer of CTG is an employee of CEE, and members of
his family are beneficiaries of a trust and a holding company that are
significant stockholders of the Company.

Certain lease, debt and equity transactions involving related parties have
been discussed in Note 5, Note 6 and Note 7.

During 1998, the Company performed professional services for a company in
which a major stockholder of the Company is also an investor. The total amount
of the services was $64,000, of which $39,000 is included in accounts
receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
1999. Transactions with this related company have been treated at arm's-
length, as if conducted with an unrelated party. Revenue on these transactions
has been recognized in accordance with the Company's revenue recognition
policy.

During 1998 and 1999, the Company subcontracted certain consulting work to a
related party in which a key employee/stockholder of the Company is an
investor. The total amount of these services is approximately $22,000 and
$50,000 for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively.

During 1999, the Company purchased approximately $982,000 of computer
software and services from a company whose President is on the Company's Board
of Directors. This Director also purchased 333,333 shares of the Company's
common stock in 1999 at $6.00 per share, the fair value of the Company's
common stock on the date of purchase. The Company also provided approximately
$217,000 of professional services to the same company during 1999.
Transactions with this related company have been conducted at arm's length, as
if with an unrelated party.

(11) SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for
reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial
statements and requires selected information for those segments to be
presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS No. 131
also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services
and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an
enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available
for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making
group, in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance.
The Company's chief decision-maker, as defined under SFAS No. 131, is the
Chief Executive Officer.

The Company views its operations and manages its business as two segments,
strategic and technology consulting services and educational services. The
Company's reportable segments are strategic business units that

F-20
<PAGE>

C-BRIDGE INTERNET SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)

provided distinct services to the end customer. They are managed separately
because each business requires different marketing and management strategies.
The Company's approach is based on the way that management organizes the
segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing
performance.

The accounting policies of the segment are the same as those described in
the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company does not allocate
operating expenses between its two reportable segments. Accordingly, the
Company's measure of performance for each reportable segment is based on total
net revenues and direct costs of services, which are reported separately in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Accordingly, no
additional disclosure is required. The Company does not identify assets and
liabilities by segment. Accordingly, identifiable assets, capital expenditures
and depreciation and amortization are not reported by segment.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III

The information required by this Part III (Items 10, 11, 12 and 13) is
hereby incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement
which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year
covered by this report.

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) 1. Financial Statements

The Consolidated Financial Statements listed in the index in Part II, Item
8, are filed as part of this report.

2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at Additions
Beginning of (Charged to Costs Balance at End
Year Ended Year and Expenses) Deductions of Year
- ---------- ------------ ----------------- ---------- --------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1997..... -- $18,500 $1,774 $16,726
December 31, 1998..... $16,726 20,000 6,224 30,502
December 31, 1999..... 30,502 69,525 -- 100,027
</TABLE>

Reference is hereby made to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the
Notes thereto included in this filing in Part II, Item 8.

F-21
<PAGE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON SCHEDULE

To C-bridge Internet Solutions, Inc.:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States, the consolidated financial statements of C-bridge Internet
Solutions, Inc. included in this Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon
dated January 19, 2000. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an
opinion on those statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Item
14(2) is the responsibility of the Company's management and is presented for
the purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules
and is not a part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states, in all material
respects, the financial data required to be set forth therein, in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 19, 2000

F-22
<PAGE>

3. Exhibits

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
------- ----------------------
<C> <S>
3.1+ Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company.
3.2+ Amended and restated By-laws of the Company.
4.1+ Specimen common stock certificate
4.2+ Specimen preferred stock certificate
10.1+ Outsourcing Agreement, dated October 8, 1999, by and among CEE
Incorporated, Cambridge Executive Enterprises, Inc. and the
Registrant.
10.2+ Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 27, 1999, by and among CEE
Incorporated, Cambridge Executive Enterprises, Inc. and the
Registrant.
10.3+ 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.
10.4+ 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
10.5+ Employment Offer Letter, dated January 5, 1999, to Joseph M. Bellini
from the Company.
10.6+ Commercial Building Lease, dated May 1, 1999, by and between Property
Management Partners, Inc. and the Registrant.
10.7+ Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 9, 1999, by and between
Raymond J. Lane and the Registrant.
10.8+ Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of
October 7, 1999, by and among InSight Capital Partners III, L.P.,
InSight Capital Partners (Cayman) III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners
III--Co-Investors, L.P., H&D Investments 97, Oracle Corporation and
the Registrant.
10.9+ Stockholders Voting Agreement, dated as of October 7, 1999, by and
among InSight Capital Partners III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners
(Cayman) III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners III--Co-Investors, L.P.,
H&D Investments 97, Oracle Corporation, Cambridge Technology
Enterprises, Limited, Butterfield Trust (Bermuda) Limited, as Trustee
of the Winsor Trust, Hamilton Trust Company Limited, as Trustee of the
Willingdon Trust, Joseph M. Bellini, Richard O. Wester and the
Registrant.
10.10+ Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of October 7, 1999, by and among
InSight Capital Partners III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners (Cayman)
III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners III--Co-Investors, L.P., H&D
Investments 97, Oracle Corporation and the Registrant.
10.11+ Right of First Offer and Co-Sale Agreement, dated as of October 7,
1999, by and among Hamilton Trust Company Limited, as Trustee of the
Willingdon Trust, Cambridge Technology Enterprises, Limited,
Butterfield Trust (Bermuda) Limited, as Trustee of the Winsor Trust,
InSight Capital Partners III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners (Cayman)
III, L.P., InSight Capital Partners III--Co-Investors, L.P., H&D
Investments 97, Oracle Corporation and the Registrant.
10.12+ Registration Rights Letter, dated October 7, 1999, to Hamilton Trust
Company Limited, as Trustee of the Willingdon Trust, Butterfield Trust
(Bermuda) Limited, as Trustee of the Winsor Trust and Cambridge
Technology Enterprises, Limited from the Registrant.
10.13+ 1999 Director Stock Option Plan.
10.14* 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.15+ Loan Security Agreement dated as of September 29, 1998, and as amended
by a Loan Modification Agreement dated as of January 27, 1999, a
Second Loan Modification Agreement dated as of April 7, 1999 and a
Third Loan Modification Agreement dated as of September 29, 1999 by
and between Silicon Valley Bank and the Registrant.
13.1 Annual report to Security Holders, incorporated by reference to this
Form 10-K.
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen, LLP.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
- --------
+ Filed as an exhibit to the Form S-1 filed on December 16, 1999.
*Filed as an exhibit to the Form S-8 filed on January 26, 2000.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

None.

F-23
<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

C-Bridge Internet Solutions, Inc.

/s/ Joseph M. Bellini
By:
_______________________________
Joseph M. Bellini,
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Joseph M. Bellini Chief Executive Officer March 30, 2000
______________________________________ (Principal Executive
Joseph M. Bellini Officer)
/s/ Richard O. Wester Vice President, Finance, March 30, 2000
______________________________________ Chief Financial Officer
Richard O. Wester and Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. Director March 30, 2000
______________________________________
Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr.
/s/ Paul R. Charron Director March 30, 2000
______________________________________
Paul R. Charron
/s/ Gerard F. King, II Director March 30, 2000
______________________________________
Gerard F. King, II
/s/ Raymond J. Lane Director March 30, 2000
______________________________________
Raymond J. Lane
/s/ Ramanan Raghavendran Director March 30, 2000
______________________________________
Ramanan Raghavendran
</TABLE>

F-24

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated January 19, 2000 included in this Form 10-K into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement (No. 52-2001899) on Form S-
8.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 2000

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 65,313,334
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 3,599,383
<ALLOWANCES> 100,027
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 71,188,617
<PP&E> 3,026,254
<DEPRECIATION> 682,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 74,893,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 7,518,860
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 189,063
<OTHER-SE> 66,922,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 74,893,661
<SALES> 22,672,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 0
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 27,840,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 189,506
<INCOME-PRETAX> (4,835,300)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (4,835,300)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (4,835,300)
<EPS-BASIC> (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED> (0.43)

</TABLE>