<PAGE>
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 1999
Registration No. 333-91243
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
--------------
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
--------------
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Delaware 7372 77-0397905
<S> <C> <C>
(State or jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Classification Number) Identification No.)
</TABLE>
One Almaden Boulevard
San Jose, California 95113-2211
(408) 975-3900
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
--------------
Bryan D. Stolle
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Agile Software Corporation
One Almaden Boulevard
San Jose, California 95113-2211
(408) 975-3900
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Copies to:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Gregory M. Gallo, Esq. Jeffrey R. Vetter, Esq.
Sally J. Rau, Esq. Scott J. Leichtner, Esq.
Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP Cynthia E. Garabedian, Esq.
400 Hamilton Avenue Fenwick & West LLP
Palo Alto, California 94301-1825 Two Palo Alto Square
(650) 328-6561 Palo Alto, California 94306
(650) 494-0600
</TABLE>
--------------
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as
practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
--------------
If the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a
delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 of the Securities Act of
1933, please check the following box. [_]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [_]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same offering. [_]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [_]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
check the following box. [_]
--------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
<TABLE>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
Proposed Proposed
Maximum Maximum Amount of
Title of Each Class of Amount to be Offering Price Aggregate Registration
Securities to be Registered Registered per Share Offering Price(1) Fee
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock ($.001) par value)................ 2,587,500(2) $167.94 $434,544,750 $119,521(3)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Estimated solely for the purposes of determining the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(c) promulgated under the Securities Act, based on the
average of the high and low trading prices of our common stock as reported
by the Nasdaq National Market on December 9, 1999.
(2) Includes 337,500 shares subject to the underwriters' over-allotment
option.
(3) Of this amount, $95,311 was previously paid.
--------------
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant
shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this
Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with
Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may +
+not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the +
+Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an +
+offer to sell these securities, and we are not soliciting an offer to buy +
+these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
PROSPECTUS (Subject to Completion)
Issued December 10, 1999
2,250,000 Shares
[LOGO OF AGILE SOFTWARE APPEARS HERE]
COMMON STOCK
-----------
Agile Software Corporation is offering 1,250,000 shares of its common stock and
the selling stockholders are offering 1,000,000 shares.
-----------
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"AGIL." On December 9, 1999, the reported last sale price of the common stock
on the Nasdaq National Market was $167 49/64 per share.
-----------
Investing in the common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors" beginning on
page 7.
-----------
PRICE $ A SHARE
-----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Underwriting
Price Discounts Proceeds Proceeds to
to and to Selling
Public Commissions Agile Stockholders
------ ------------ -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Per Share............................. $ $ $ $
Total................................. $ $ $ $
</TABLE>
Agile has granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional
337,500 shares to cover over-allotments.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not
approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if this prospectus is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated expects to deliver the shares to purchasers
on , 1999.
-----------
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
DEUTSCHE BANC ALEX. BROWN
HAMBRECHT & QUIST
, 1999
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Prospectus Summary.................. 3
Risk Factors........................ 7
Use of Proceeds..................... 20
Dividend Policy..................... 20
Price Range of Common Stock......... 20
Capitalization...................... 21
Dilution............................ 22
Selected Consolidated Financial
Data............................... 23
Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations...................... 25
Business............................ 39
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Management....................... 51
Certain Transactions............. 58
Principal and Selling
Stockholders.................... 60
Description of Capital Stock..... 66
Shares Eligible for Future Sale.. 69
Underwriters..................... 71
Legal Matters.................... 72
Experts.......................... 72
Where to Find Additional
Information About Agile......... 73
Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements...................... F-1
</TABLE>
----------------
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that
contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to
buy, shares of our common stock only in those jurisdictions where offers and
sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate
only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of
this prospectus or of any sale of our common stock.
2
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
You should read the following summary together with the more detailed
information regarding our company and the common stock being sold in this
offering and our consolidated financial statements and notes to the
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
We develop and market product content management software, which is software
that enables companies to collaborate over the Internet by interactively
exchanging information about the manufacture and supply of products and
components. Our suite of software products is designed to improve the ability
of all members of the manufacturing supply chain to communicate and collaborate
with one another about new or changing information concerning the manufacture,
source or supply of products or components. We believe that our products are
well-suited for participants in outsourced supply chains, as well as companies
managing multi-site engineering, manufacturing, sales and distribution
operations, connected via the Internet. Since June 1996, when we shipped our
first product, we have licensed our products to over 350 customers in the
computers and peripherals, components, consumer electronics, data networking
and telecommunications equipment, electronics manufacturing, medical equipment
and semiconductor equipment markets.
The competitive environment for manufacturing and supply companies has
intensified dramatically and expanded globally in recent years. Many of these
companies are shifting their organizations from traditional manufacturing
approaches, where a manufacturer controls most phases of the manufacturing
process of its products from raw materials to finished goods, to a
manufacturing process where much or all of the manufacturing process is
outsourced to multiple companies as part of a supply chain. Outsourcing
production is geared toward creating supply chains that are more efficient,
dynamic and flexible than manufacturing operations that are controlled by
manufacturers. A critical aspect of managing the outsourced supply chain across
multiple suppliers is finding effective ways to store, access and share
information within the manufacturer, as well as with all participants in the
supply chain during each stage of the production process.
The Internet has created new and evolving ways for conducting commerce.
Companies that have successfully implemented strategies to communicate with
their customers over the Internet now face the challenge of utilizing the
Internet and intranets to gain the same level of increased efficiencies in
their supply chain.
The Agile solution is designed to facilitate communication and collaboration
within and among supply chain members without requiring substantial investments
in additional technology infrastructure. We believe that our solution enables
companies and their supply chain partners to increase revenues by accelerating
time-to-market, facilitate cost-effective production by increasing output,
reducing inventory and shortening the production process, and enhance return on
investment by facilitating rapid implementation.
Our growth strategy is to be the leading provider of business-to-business
collaborative supply chain applications to global organizations. We will focus
on providing superior customer satisfaction to continue to build a highly
referenceable customer base of market leaders in targeted manufacturing
industry vertical markets. We seek to capitalize on network effects that can be
created when our software is deployed across the supply chains of our
customers, enabling even non-customer participants in the supply chain to
experience first-hand some of the benefits from our solutions. We will also
seek to continue the development of our technology to extend the features and
functionality of our product content management software.
We incurred net losses of approximately $11.4 million for fiscal 1999 and
$8.4 million for the six months ended October 31, 1999, and as of October 31,
1999 we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $34.9 million.
3
<PAGE>
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On November 23, 1999, we acquired Digital Market, Inc., a California
corporation. Digital Market provides Internet-based solutions for the sourcing
and procurement of production materials used by manufacturing companies. This
acquisition is an example of our strategy of extending supply chain
collaboration and the functionality of our products. With Digital Market, we
believe that we will be able to address the constraints in the sourcing and
procurement of electronic production materials. Our Agile Anywhere products
enable multiple parties within a manufacturing supply chain to collaboratively
make product and component sourcing, production and supply decisions and to
respond to changes made by other supply chain partners. This functionality aids
companies in determining what components to use to build a product. Digital
Market's electronic procurement solution enables companies to streamline the
processes of sourcing, quoting and ordering production materials and more
efficiently purchase those components. We believe that the combination of
Agile's products with those of Digital Market will enable the product content
information aggregated in Agile Anywhere during the new product introduction
and product change processes to be fed directly into Digital Market's direct
materials procurement applications, enhancing efficiency in the purchase of
those components. In particular, for companies sourcing electronic components
requiring accurate ordering, we believe this enhanced functionality will create
a powerful, Internet-based supply chain solution.
Digital Market's primary product is Digital Buyer, a software product that
automates the procurement process and enables manufacturers to acquire
electronic components in real time. Digital Buyer provides decision support
services, including parts list management and approved supplier maintenance, as
well as interactive generation and management of quotes and orders. Digital
Buyer can integrate into existing manufacturing and enterprise resource
planning software systems. Digital Buyer, like Agile Anywhere, is a Java-based
and Internet-focused business-ready application.
The purchase price included $20.0 million in cash and approximately $79.2
million in common stock, based upon the issuance of 611,765 shares at $129.50
per share, based upon our average stock price a number of days before and after
the transaction measurement date, in exchange for all of the issued and
outstanding capital stock and warrants of Digital Market. In addition, we
assumed all of the outstanding options to purchase the common stock of Digital
Market under its stock option plans, which were converted into options to
purchase an aggregate of 55,910 shares of our common stock. The estimated fair
value of the assumed options is approximately $7.8 million and was included as
a component of the purchase price. We also anticipate incurring approximately
$2.0 million in acquisition expenses. The total purchase price of Digital
Market was $109.0 million.
4
<PAGE>
THE OFFERING
<TABLE>
<C> <S>
Common stock offered:
Shares offered by us..................................... 1,250,000 shares
Shares offered by the selling stockholders............... 1,000,000 shares
Total.................................................. 2,250,000 shares
Total common stock to be outstanding after this offering.. 22,617,200 shares
Over-allotment option..................................... 337,500 shares
Use of proceeds........................................... For general corporate
purposes, including
working capital and
capital expenditures.
See "Use of Proceeds."
Nasdaq National Market symbol............................. AGIL
</TABLE>
The above information is based on 20,698,245 shares outstanding as of
October 31, 1999. This information does not include 1,834,525 shares of common
stock subject to outstanding options under our 1995 Stock Option Plan as of
October 31, 1999, and 41,111 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
an outstanding warrant. See "Capitalization" on page 21 and "Management--Stock
Plans" on page 55 for additional information concerning the terms, conditions
and number of outstanding shares of our capital stock and stock options.
Unless otherwise specifically stated, the information in this prospectus:
. assumes no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option;
. assumes the exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase 57,190
shares of our common stock in November 1999 and assumes no exercise
of an outstanding warrant to purchase 41,111 shares of our common
stock; and
. includes the issuance of 611,765 shares of common stock in connection
with our acquisition of Digital Market on November 23, 1999.
We are incorporated in Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located
at One Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, California 95113, and our telephone number
is (408) 975-3900. Our principal web site is located at www.agilesoft.com.
Information contained on our web site does not constitute a part of this
prospectus. In this prospectus, "Agile," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Agile
Software Corporation and not to the underwriters.
Agile, Agile Workplace, Agile Anywhere, Agile eHub, Agile iCM, My Agile,
Agile eXpress Viewer, Agile ChangeCAST, Agile Product Definition Server, Agile
Product Change Server, Agile AML Server, Agile Administrator, Agile Scan, Agile
Import, Agile Export and the Agile logo are trademarks of Agile Software
Corporation, which may be registered or pending registration in certain
jurisdictions. Digital Market and the Digital Market logo are trademarks of
Digital Market. All other trademarks or tradenames referred to in this
prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
5
<PAGE>
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 13, Pro Forma Six Months Pro Forma
1995 Fiscal Year Ended April Fiscal Year Ended October Six Months
(Inception) to 30, Ended 31, Ended
April 30, -------------------------- April 30, ---------------- October 31,
1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 1998 1999 1999
-------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- ------- ------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Statement
of Operations Data:
Total revenues.......... $ 38 $ 1,352 $ 8,003 $ 16,807 $ 18,293 $ 7,053 $12,825 $13,230
Gross profit............ 32 1,086 5,835 10,822 9,860 4,558 9,647 8,722
Loss from operations.... (1,399) (4,906) (8,874) (11,606) (54,755) (5,463) (8,723) (31,306)
Net loss................ (1,327) (4,836) (8,942) (11,428) (54,465) (5,313) (8,359) (31,248)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted...... $ (1.94) $ (3.72) $ (4.20) $ (3.87) $ (15.28) $ (1.89) $ (.90) $ (3.16)
Weighted average
shares................ 684 1,300 2,129 2,952 3,564 2,814 9,264 9,876
Unaudited pro forma net
loss per share:
Basic and diluted...... $ (.78) $ (.50)
Weighted average
shares................ 14,668 16,852
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of October 31, 1999
-----------------------------
Pro Forma
Actual Pro Forma As Adjusted
------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents......................... $81,174 $61,302 $257,837
Working capital................................... 76,210 50,409 246,944
Total assets...................................... 91,465 181,410 377,945
Long-term obligations, noncurrent................. 858 956 956
Stockholders' equity.............................. 78,725 163,425 359,960
</TABLE>
Shares used in computing unaudited pro forma basic and diluted net loss per
share include the shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share
adjusted for the conversion of preferred stock to common stock, as if the
conversion occurred at the date of original issuance. The pro forma information
above includes the issuance of 611,765 shares of common stock to the holders of
all outstanding capital stock and warrants of Digital Market in connection with
our acquisition of Digital Market on November 23, 1999. The pro forma as
adjusted information above reflects the application of the net proceeds from
the sale of the 1,250,000 shares of common stock that we are offering, based
upon an assumed public offering price of $167 49/64 per share, after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and our estimated offering
expenses, and reflects the exercise of warrants to purchase 57,190 shares of
common stock.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations data presents the
results of operations of Agile for the year ended April 30, 1999 and the six
months ended October 31, 1999, combined with the statement of operations of
Digital Market for the year ended March 31, 1999 and the six months ended
September 30, 1999, giving effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred as
of May 1, 1998. The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet data gives
effect to the merger as if the transaction occurred on October 31, 1999 and
combines the unaudited balance sheet of Agile as of October 31, 1999 and the
unaudited balance sheet of Digital Market as of September 30, 1999.
6
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all
of the other information included in this prospectus, before you decide to buy
our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business
could be harmed. If our business is harmed, the trading price of our common
stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Operations
Because We Have a Limited Operating History, It Is Difficult to Evaluate
Our Business and Prospects
We are still in the early stages of our development, so evaluating our
business operations and our prospects is difficult. We incorporated in 1995
and began shipping our first product in June 1996. The revenues and income
potential of our business and market are unproven. We will encounter risks and
difficulties frequently encountered by early-stage companies in new and
rapidly evolving markets. These risks include the following:
. until our acquisition of Digital Market, we have had only one product
suite, and will need to successfully introduce new products and enhance
existing products to this suite, including Agile Anywhere, a new version
which has been available only since July 1999;
. we need to integrate our acquisition of Digital Market and successfully
market its Digital Buyer product which has only been sold to a limited
number of customers;
. we need to increase sales to achieve profitability, requiring us to sell
additional licenses and software products to our existing customers and
expand our customer base outside of the electronics and medical device
industries;
. we need to expand our sales and marketing, customer support and
professional services organizations, build strategic relationships and
expand our international operations in order to increase sales; and
. we need to effectively manage our anticipated growth which could lead to
management distractions and increased operating expenses, and will
require us to attract and retain key personnel.
Our business strategy may not be successful and we may not be able to
successfully address these risks. In addition, because of our limited
operating history, we have limited insight into trends that may emerge and
affect our business.
We Have a History of Losses, We Expect to Incur Losses in the Future and We
May Not Achieve or Maintain Profitability
We incurred net losses of approximately $4.8 million for fiscal 1997, $8.9
million for fiscal 1998, $11.4 million for fiscal 1999 and $8.4 million for
the six months ended October 31, 1999. As of October 31, 1999, we had an
accumulated deficit of approximately $34.9 million. Moreover, we expect to
continue to incur significant sales and marketing, research and development
and general and administrative expenses. We have incurred and expect to
continue to incur substantial non-cash costs relating to the amortization of
deferred compensation which will contribute to our net losses. We expect to
incur losses for the foreseeable future. We will need to generate significant
increases in revenues to achieve and maintain profitability, and we may not be
able to do so. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to
sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the
future. See "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" on page 23 and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" on page 25 for more detailed information about our operating
results.
7
<PAGE>
Our Quarterly Operating Results Fluctuate and Are Difficult to Predict and,
if Our Future Results Are Below the Expectations of Public Market Analysts
or Investors, the Price of Our Common Stock May Decline
Our quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past and
are likely to vary significantly in the future, which makes it difficult for
us to predict our future operating results. This quarter-to-quarter
fluctuation is due to a number of factors, including the following:
. our successful integration of Digital Market, its Digital Buyer product,
technologies, computer systems and employees;
. fluctuations in demand for Internet product content management software;
. size and timing of sales and installations of our products;
. entry of new competitors into our market, or the announcement of new
products or product enhancements by competitors;
. our ability to successfully expand our direct sales force and our
international sales organization;
. changes in our sales force incentives;
. unexpected delays in developing or introducing new and enhanced products;
. unexpected decline in purchases by our existing customers, including
purchases of additional licenses and maintenance contracts;
. delays in our customers' orders due to their year 2000 priorities;
. variability in the mix of our license and professional service revenues;
. our ability to accurately price fixed-priced professional services
projects;
. variability in the mix of professional services that we perform versus
those performed for our customers by others; and
. our ability to establish and maintain relationships with our third-party
implementation partners.
License revenues in any quarter can be difficult to forecast because they
depend on orders shipped or installed in that quarter. Moreover, we typically
recognize a substantial percentage of revenues in the last month of each
quarter; for example, in fiscal 1999 as well as the first two quarters of
fiscal 2000, revenues generated each quarter that were recognized in the last
month of the quarter ranged from approximately 35% to 51%. This increase in
revenues earned in the last month of each quarter is driven primarily by
quarter-end commissions payable and the time required to implement software
installations. A high percentage of our operating expenses are essentially
fixed in the short term and we may be unable to adjust spending to compensate
for an unexpected shortfall in our revenues. In addition, we expect our
operating expenses to increase as we expand our engineering and sales and
marketing operations, broaden our customer support capabilities, develop new
distribution channels and strategic alliances, fund increased levels of
research and development and build our operational infrastructure. As a
result, if we experience delays in recognizing revenue, or if our revenues do
not grow faster than the increase in these expenses, we could experience
significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter.
If, in response to market pressures or other demands, we introduce new
pricing structures for our existing products, we could experience customer
dissatisfaction and loss of sales. In addition, if we introduce products that
are sold in a manner different from how we currently market our products, or
we could recognize revenue differently than under our current accounting
policies. Depending on the manner in which we sell existing or future
products, this could have the effect of extending the length of time over
which we recognize revenues. Furthermore, our quarterly revenues could be
significantly affected based on how applicable accounting standards are
amended or interpreted over time.
8
<PAGE>
In addition, we have accounted for options to purchase 70,000 shares of
common stock granted to consultants subsequent to April 30, 1999 under
variable plan accounting, and will record approximately $6.4 million in
expense over the vesting period of the options. This expense associated with
these options may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter through
fiscal 2005 if the price of our stock fluctuates and could cause our operating
results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. During the three months
ended October 31, 1999, the expense associated with these options totaled
$320,000.
Due to these and other factors, we believe that period-to-period
comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful and should not be
relied upon as indicators of our future performance. It is possible that in
some future periods our results of operations may be below the expectations of
public market analysts and investors. If this occurs, the price of our common
stock may decline.
We May Not Achieve Anticipated Revenues if the Introduction and Customer
Acceptance of Our New Release, Agile Anywhere, or Any Upgrades or
Enhancements to Our Products, Is Unsuccessful
Our future financial performance will depend on the successful introduction
and customer acceptance of Agile Anywhere and any upgrades or enhancements
that we may make to our products in the future, including our introduction of
the Digital Buyer product formerly offered by Digital Market. We have
generated substantially all of our revenues from licenses and services related
to current and prior versions of our product suite. Agile Anywhere, the latest
version of our product suite, has only been available since July 1999. We
believe that revenues from Agile Anywhere, together with revenues from
maintenance and support contracts from Agile Anywhere and prior versions of
our suite, will account for a substantial portion of our revenues for the
foreseeable future. If we are unable to ship or implement any upgrades or
enhancements when planned, or if the introduction of upgrades or enhancements
causes customers to defer orders for our existing products, we may not achieve
anticipated revenues.
Our Acquisition of Digital Market, and any Future Acquisitions, May Be
Difficult to Integrate, Disrupt Our Business, Dilute Stockholder Value or
Divert Management Attention
We acquired Digital Market on November 23, 1999. We may encounter risks to
our business during our integration of Digital Market, including:
. difficulties in assimilation of acquired personnel, operations,
technologies or products;
. unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition;
. diversion of management's attention from other business concerns;
. adverse effects on our existing business relationships with our or
Digital Market's customers; and
. inability to retain employees of Digital Market.
As part of our business strategy, we may in the future seek to acquire or
invest in additional businesses, products or technologies that we believe
could complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage, enhance
our technical capabilities or that may otherwise offer growth opportunities.
These future acquisitions could pose the same risks to our business posed by
our acquisition of Digital Market described above. In addition, with future
acquisitions, we could use substantial portions of our available cash,
including the proceeds of this offering, as all or a portion of the purchase
price. We could also issue additional securities as consideration for these
acquisitions, which could cause our stockholders to suffer significant
dilution. Our acquisition of Digital Market, and any future acquisitions, may
not generate any additional revenue or provide any benefit to our business.
9
<PAGE>
We May Not Achieve Anticipated Additional Revenues or Benefits As a Result
of Our Acquisition of Digital Market
With the acquisition of Digital Market, we will seek to extend the
functionality of Agile Anywhere with Digital Market's direct materials
sourcing, quoting and ordering applications. If we are unable to successfully
market our products with the Digital Buyer product offered by Digital Market,
or create new or enhanced products combining the functionality provided by
both, we may not achieve enhanced sales or other anticipated benefits from our
acquisition of Digital Market. This is particularly difficult because Digital
Market has had limited product sales to date. If we fail to achieve the
anticipated benefits from the acquisition, we may incur increased expenses,
experience a shortfall in our anticipated revenues and may not obtain a
satisfactory return on our investment. In addition, if any significant number
of the Digital Market employees fail to remain employed with us, we may
experience delays in the production and shipment of the Digital Buyer product,
or fail to achieve the expected benefits of the acquisition.
Year 2000 Considerations Among Our Customers and Potential Customers May
Reduce Our Sales
We may experience reduced sales of products as customers and potential
customers put a priority on correcting year 2000 problems and therefore defer
purchasing decisions for software products until later in 2000. Accordingly,
demand for our products may be particularly volatile and unpredictable for the
remainder of 1999 and early 2000.
Implementation of Our Products By Large Customers May Be Complex and
Customers Could Become Dissatisfied if Implementation of Our Products
Proves Difficult, Costly or Time-Consuming
Our products must integrate with many existing computer systems and
software programs used by our customers. Integrating with many other computer
systems and software programs can be complex, time consuming and expensive and
cause delays in the deployment of our products. Because we are one of the
first companies to offer products designed for product content management,
many customers will be facing these integration issues for the first time in
the context of collaborating with supply chain partners. Customers could
become dissatisfied with our products if implementations prove to be
difficult, costly or time-consuming.
We Currently Perform Most of Our Implementations on a Fixed-Price Basis,
Which Could Cause Us to Incur More Costs Than We Expect
When we install our products or when we have a third party install them, we
typically charge customers a fixed fee for these services. At the time of a
product sale and prior to agreeing to an installation price, we estimate the
amount of work involved for a particular installation project. We have at
times in the past underestimated and may in the future underestimate the
amount of time or resources required to install our products. If we do not
correctly estimate the amount of time or resources required for a large number
of installations, our gross margins could decline.
If We Do Not Sell Additional Licenses or Enhanced Versions or Upgrades of
Our Products to Existing Customers, We May Not Achieve Revenue Growth
The size of a new customer's initial order is relatively small and may
include a limited number of user licenses. In later orders, customers often
add user licenses or additional products designed for specific functions, such
as the AML Server targeted at manufacturers. In order to grow revenues, we
depend on sales of additional user licenses to our existing customers as well
as sales of new licenses to new customers. Therefore, it is important that our
customers are satisfied with their initial product implementations and that
they believe that expanded use of the product they purchased will provide them
with additional benefits. Customers could choose not to purchase any new
products or expand the use of our products. If we do not increase sales to
existing customers, we may not be able to achieve revenue growth.
10
<PAGE>
If We Do Not Establish and Maintain Relationships With Key Partners, We May
Encounter Difficulty in Providing Implementation and Customer Support of
Our Products
We rely heavily on our relationships with consulting and integration
partners to implement our software, provide customer support services and
endorse our products during the evaluation stage of the sales cycle.
Currently, only four companies provide implementation services for our
products in North America. We expect to increasingly rely on these types of
partners in the future. These companies are not contractually obligated to
continue to provide implementation services for us or to otherwise promote our
products. Although we seek to develop and maintain relationships with these
types of service providers, they may have similar or more established
relationships with our competitors. If these service providers do not increase
this segment of their business, or reduce or discontinue their relationships
with us or their support of our products, our business could be harmed. We
will need to develop new third party relationships if sales of our products
increase and our current partners cannot fulfill the need for implementation
and customer support services. Without these third parties we would have to
expand our services organization to increase the consulting and professional
services that we provide to our customers and divert resources from other
areas of our business. If we are required to expand our professional services
capabilities, we may not be able to do so on a timely basis.
We are beginning to implement larger deployments of our products together
with third parties such as Andersen Consulting and Siemens. If we are not
successful with these joint deployments, we may incur increased costs and
customer dissatisfaction and may not achieve increased sales and market
acceptance of our products.
To meet customer demand, we might have to outsource services to more costly
independent contractors and other third parties. In addition, if our
implementation partners do not adequately perform implementation services, our
customers could become dissatisfied with our products. In order to avoid
dissatisfaction, we may need to provide supplemental implementation services
at no additional cost to the customer. Although we could experience an
increase in services revenues if our service partners are not successful,
services revenues have lower gross margins than license revenues. We could
also experience delays in revenue recognition if customer implementation
projects fall behind schedule.
We May Experience Customer Dissatisfaction and Lost Sales if Our Products
Do Not Scale to Accommodate Substantial Increases in the Number of
Concurrent Users
Our strategy requires that our software be highly scalable, or able to
accommodate substantial increases in the number of users concurrently using
the product. To date, however, only a limited number of our customers have
deployed our software to manage the manufacturing process across their entire
organization. While we have performed product testing on the scalability of
our products, these products have not been tested in the context of a customer
implementation. If our customers cannot successfully implement large-scale
deployments, or if they determine that our products cannot accommodate large-
scale deployments, we could experience customer dissatisfaction and find it
more difficult to obtain new customers or to sell additional products to our
existing customers.
We May Not Be Able to Increase Sales of Our Products if We Do Not Expand
Our Direct Sales Organization
We sell our products primarily through our direct sales force. Our ability
to increase our sales will depend on our ability to recruit, train and retain
top quality sales people with the advanced sales skills and technical
knowledge we need. There is a shortage of the sales personnel we need, and
competition for qualified personnel is intense in our industry. In addition,
it takes time for our new sales personnel to become productive, particularly
our senior sales and services personnel, who could take up to nine months to
become fully productive. If we are unable to hire or retain qualified sales
personnel, or if newly hired personnel fail to develop the necessary skills or
reach productivity more slowly than anticipated, it would be more difficult
for us to sell our products, and we may experience a shortfall in revenues.
11
<PAGE>
Our Lengthy and Variable Sales Cycle Makes it Difficult For Us to Predict
When or if Sales Will Be Made
Our products have an unpredictable sales cycle that contributes to the
uncertainty of our future operating results. Our product content management
software is a new category of products, and customers often view the purchase
of our products as a significant and strategic decision. As a result,
customers may take time to evaluate our products, resulting in a sales cycle
that has historically ranged from approximately four to seven months. The sale
of our products may be subject to delays due to the lengthy internal
budgeting, approval and evaluation processes of our customers. We may expend
significant sales and marketing expenses during this evaluation period before
the customer places an order with us. Customers may initially purchase a
smaller number of user licenses before expanding the order to allow a greater
number of users to benefit from the application. Larger customers may purchase
our products as part of multiple simultaneous purchasing decisions, which may
result in additional unplanned administrative processing and other delays in
our product sales. If sales forecasted from a specific customer for a
particular quarter are not realized, we may experience an unplanned shortfall
in revenues. As a result, we have only a limited ability to forecast the
timing and size of sales of our products.
The Success of Our Business Depends on Our Key Personnel, Whose Knowledge
of Our Business and Technical Expertise Would Be Difficult to Replace
Our success depends largely on the continued contributions of our key
senior management, particularly Bryan D. Stolle, our Chief Executive Officer,
who is not bound by an employment agreement, as well as of our key engineering
and sales and marketing personnel. We do not have key-man life insurance on
Mr. Stolle. If one or more members of our senior management or any of our key
employees were to resign, the loss of personnel could result in delays to
product development, loss of sales, and diversion of management resources. See
"Management" for additional information on our key personnel.
Because of Competition For Additional Qualified Personnel, We May Not Be
Able to Recruit or Retain Necessary Personnel, Which Could Impact
Development or Sales of Our Products
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified,
experienced employees. There is substantial competition for experienced
engineering, sales and marketing personnel in our industry. The volatility and
current market price of our common stock may make it more difficult for us to
recruit, hire and retain qualified personnel, or cause us to incur higher
salary costs. In addition, there is currently a very low employment rate,
particularly for technical personnel, in the Silicon Valley where we are
located, increasing our difficulty in hiring and retaining personnel. If we
are unable to retain our existing key personnel, or attract and retain
additional qualified personnel, we may from time to time experience inadequate
levels of staffing to perform services for our customers. As a result, our
growth could be limited due to our lack of capacity to develop and market our
products to our customers, or we could experience deterioration in service
levels or decreased customer satisfaction.
Our Efforts to Expand Sales of Our Products to Other Industries May Not
Succeed
We have historically sold our products primarily to companies in the
electronics and medical device manufacturing industries. We intend to market
products to customers in additional industries. Although we have targeted
enterprises in other markets as potential customers, these potential customers
may not be as willing to purchase products like ours as have other technology-
based industries such as the electronics and medical device manufacturing
industries.
The Market For Our Products Is Newly Emerging and Customers May Not Accept
Our Products
The market for software products that allow companies to collaborate with
suppliers on product information and change is newly emerging. Companies have
not traditionally automated this product content management process throughout
the supply chain. We cannot be certain that this market will continue to
develop and grow or that companies will elect to utilize our products rather
than attempt to develop applications internally or through
12
<PAGE>
other sources. In addition, the use of the Internet, as well as corporate
intranets, has not been widely adopted for sharing product information as well
as for collaboration among supply chain participants. Companies that have
already invested substantial resources in other methods of sharing product
information during the manufacturing and supply process may be reluctant to
adopt a new approach that may replace, limit or compete with their existing
systems or methods. We expect that we will continue to need to pursue
intensive marketing and sales efforts to educate prospective customers about
the uses and benefits of our products. Therefore, demand for and market
acceptance of our products will be subject to a high level of uncertainty.
Competition Among Providers of Software Enabling Collaboration in a
Manufacturing Supply Chain May Increase, Which Could Cause Us to Reduce
Prices, and Result in Reduced Gross Margins or Loss of Market Share
The market for products that enable companies to interactively manage and
share information relating to the manufacture and supply of products is new,
highly fragmented, rapidly changing and increasingly competitive. We expect
competition to intensify, which could result in price reductions for our
products, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. Competitors vary in
size and in the scope and breadth of the products and services offered. We
face potential competition from in-house development efforts by potential
customers or partners, vendors of software designed for management of
engineering information, and developers of general purpose groupware software
addressing only limited technology components involved in managing data
generated by changes to the engineering process. We also face potential
competition from providers of enterprise software.
Many of our actual or potential competitors have a number of significant
advantages over us, including:
. longer operating histories;
. significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other
resources;
. significantly greater name recognition and a larger installed base of
customers; and
. well-established relationships with our actual and potential customers as
well as with systems integrators and other vendors and service providers.
These competitors may also be able to respond more quickly to new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote
greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products,
than we can. Some of our actual or potential competitors may also bundle their
products in a manner that may discourage potential customers from purchasing
our products. Accordingly, we may not be able to maintain or expand our sales
if competition increases and we are unable to respond effectively. See
"Business--Competition" on page 47 for further discussion of the competitive
market in which we operate.
We May Experience Difficulties in Introducing New Products and Upgrades
Which Could Result in Negative Publicity, Loss of Sales, Delay in Market
Acceptance or Customer Dissatisfaction
Our future financial performance depends on our successful and timely
development, introduction and market acceptance of new and enhanced products.
The life cycles of our products are difficult to predict because the market
for our products is new and emerging, and is characterized by rapid
technological change, changing customer needs and evolving industry standards.
The introduction of products or computer systems employing new technologies
and emerging industry standards could render our existing products obsolete
and unmarketable. For example, portions of our software are written in the
Java computer programming language. If a new software language becomes
standard in our industry or is considered more robust than Java, we may need
to rewrite portions of our products in another computer language in order to
remain competitive. The introduction of enhancements to our suite of products
may also cause customers to defer orders for our existing products. We may
experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful
development, introduction or marketing of new or enhanced products in the
future. In addition, those products may not meet the requirements of the
marketplace and achieve market acceptance.
13
<PAGE>
We expect to add new products to our supply chain applications by
acquisition or internal development and by developing enhancements to our
existing products. We have in the past experienced delays in the planned
release dates of our software products and upgrades, and we have discovered
software defects in new products after their introduction. New products or
upgrades may not be released according to schedule, or may contain defects when
released. Either situation could result in negative publicity, loss of sales,
delay in market acceptance of our products or customer claims against us.
Our Products Might Not Be Compatible With All Major Platforms, Which Could
Inhibit Sales
We must continually modify and enhance our products to keep pace with
changes in computer hardware and software and database technology, as well as
emerging technical standards in the software industry. For example, we have
designed our products to work with databases and servers such as Oracle and
Microsoft SQL Server. Any changes to these platforms could require us to modify
our products, and could cause us to delay releasing a product until the updated
version of that platform has been released. Furthermore, third parties develop
adapters to integrate our products with other design, manufacture, finance and
supply chain systems used by our customers. We rely on these third parties to
update the adapters to reflect changes to our products as well as to the
targeted platform in order to maintain the functionality provided by our
products. As a result, uncertainties related to the timing and nature of new
product announcements, introductions or modifications by vendors of operating
systems, back-office applications and browsers and other Internet-related
applications could hurt our business, as customers may not be certain as to how
our product will operate with their existing systems.
In addition, although portions of our products are based upon the Java
programming language, the Java language does not offer all of the features
available in Windows. Accordingly, certain features available to products that
run on Windows may not be available in the non-Windows version of our products,
and this could result in reduced customer demand. Furthermore, some of our
products do not run on certain types of popular server computers, such as those
that utilize the UNIX operating system. If another platform becomes more widely
used, we could be required to convert, or "port," our product to that platform.
We may not succeed in these efforts, and even if we do, potential customers may
not choose our product. As we extend the functionality of our products to run
on additional platforms, we may incur increased development costs.
If We Are Unable to Timely Expand Our International Operations, We May Not
Achieve Anticipated Revenue Growth
We believe that expansion of our international operations will be necessary
for our future success, and a key aspect to our business strategy is to expand
our sales and support organizations internationally. Therefore, we believe that
we will need to commit significant resources to expand our international
operations. We employ sales professionals in Europe and are in the early stages
of expanding into the Asia Pacific market. If we are unable to successfully
enter into and expand these international markets on a timely basis, we may not
be able to achieve anticipated revenue growth. This expansion may be more
difficult or take longer than we anticipate, and we may not be able to
successfully market, sell, deliver and support our products internationally.
If successful in our international expansion, we will be subject to a number
of risks associated with international business activities. These risks
include:
. difficulty in providing customer support for our software in multiple
time zones;
. need to develop our software in multiple foreign languages;
. longer sales cycles associated with educating foreign customers on the
benefits of using our products;
. greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable from customers
located abroad;
. political and economic instability, particularly in Asia;
. difficulties in enforcing agreements through foreign legal systems; and
. unexpected changes in regulatory requirements that may limit our ability
to export our software or sell into particular jurisdictions or impose
multiple conflicting tax laws and regulations.
14
<PAGE>
To date, most of our revenues have been denominated in United States
dollars. If we experience an increase in the portion of our revenues
denominated in foreign currencies, we may incur greater risks in currency
fluctuations, particularly since we translate our foreign currency revenues
once at the end of each quarter. In the future, our international revenues
could be denominated in the Euro, the currency of the European Union. The Euro
is an untested currency and may be subject to economic risks that are not
currently contemplated. We currently do not engage in foreign exchange hedging
activities, and therefore our international revenues and expenses are
currently subject to the risks of foreign currency fluctuations.
We Depend on Licensed Technology and the Loss or Inability to Maintain
These Technology Licenses Could Result in Increased Cost or Delays in Sales
of Our Products
We license technology on a non-exclusive basis from several businesses for
use with our products, including licenses from RSA Data Security, Inc. for
security and encryption technology software, Actuate Corporation for reporting
capability and from Cimmetry Systems Inc. for our viewers. We anticipate that
we will continue to license technology from third parties in the future. Some
of the software we license from third parties would be difficult to replace.
This software may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable
terms, if at all. The loss or inability to maintain any of these technology
licenses could result in delays in the licensing of our products until
equivalent technology, if available, is identified, licensed and integrated.
In addition, the effective implementation of our products depends upon the
successful operation of third-party licensed products in conjunction with our
products, and therefore any undetected errors in these licensed products may
prevent the implementation or impair the functionality of products, delay new
product introductions and/or injure our reputation. The increased use of
third-party software could require us to enter into license agreements with
third parties, which could result in higher royalty payments and a loss of
product differentiation.
Defects in Our Software Products Could Diminish Demand For Our Products
Our software products are complex and may contain errors, including year
2000 related errors, that may be detected at any point in the life of the
product. We have in the past discovered software errors in certain of our
products and as a result have experienced delays in shipment of products
during the period required to correct these errors. We cannot assure you that,
despite testing by us, our implementation partners and our current and
potential customers, errors will not be found in new products or releases
after shipment, resulting in loss of revenue, delay in market acceptance and
sales, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation or
increased service and warranty costs.
Further, our products are generally used in systems with other vendors'
products, and as a result, our products must integrate successfully with these
existing systems. System errors, whether caused by our products or those of
another vendor, could adversely affect the market acceptance of our products,
and any necessary revisions could cause us to incur significant expenses.
If We Become Subject to Product Liability Litigation, It Could Be Time
Consuming and Costly to Defend
Since our products are used for mission critical applications in the supply
chain, errors, defects or other performance problems could result in financial
or other damages to our customers. For example, our products are designed to
communicate information relating to changes in product specifications during
the manufacturing process. If a supplier or other participant receives
inaccurate or erroneous data, it is possible that it could claim it incurred
damages based on its reliance on that data. Although our license agreements
generally contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product
liability litigation, existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial
decisions could negate such limitation of liability provisions. Product
liability litigation, even if unsuccessful, would be time-consuming and costly
to defend and could harm our business.
In Order to Manage Our Growth and Expansion, We Will Need to Improve and
Implement New Systems, Procedures and Controls
We have recently experienced a period of rapid growth and expansion that
has placed a significant strain on our management information systems and our
administrative, operational and financial resources. For example,
15
<PAGE>
we have grown from 65 employees at April 30, 1997 to 188 employees at October
31, 1999. In addition, Digital Market had 49 employees as of October 31, 1999.
If we are unable to manage our growth and expansion in an efficient or timely
manner, our business will be seriously harmed. In addition, we have recently
hired a significant number of employees and plan to further increase our total
headcount. We also plan to expand the geographic scope of our operations. This
expansion has resulted and will continue to result in substantial demands on
our management resources. To accommodate continued anticipated growth and
expansion, we will be required to:
. improve existing and implement new operational and financial systems,
procedures and controls;
. hire, train, manage, retain and motivate qualified personnel; and
. enter into relationships with strategic partners.
These measures may place additional burdens on our management and our
internal resources.
If We Are Unable to Protect Our Intellectual Property We May Lose a
Valuable Asset, Experience Reduced Market Share or Incur Costly Litigation
to Protect Our Rights
Our success and ability to compete depend upon our proprietary technology,
including our brand and logo and the technology underlying our products. We
rely on trademark, trade secret and copyright laws to protect our intellectual
property. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, a third
party could copy or otherwise obtain our software or other proprietary
information without authorization, or could develop software competitive to
ours. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate and
our competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our
products or design around patents that may be issued to us or our other
intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not
protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the
United States, and we expect that it will become more difficult to monitor the
use of our products if we increase our international presence.
We may have to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets or know-how or to determine their scope,
validity or enforceability. Enforcing or defending our proprietary technology
is expensive, could cause the diversion of our resources, and may not prove
successful. Our protective measures may prove inadequate to protect our
proprietary rights, and any failure to enforce or protect our rights could
cause us to lose a valuable asset.
We May Be Subject to Intellectual Property Infringement Claims That, With
or Without Merit, Could Be Costly to Defend or Settle
We may from time to time be subject to claims of infringement of other
parties' proprietary rights or claims that our own intellectual property
rights are invalid. For example, Digital Market is currently involved in
litigation relating to alleged infringement of another party's intellectual
property, as described under "Business--Legal Proceedings" on page 49. There
has been a substantial amount of litigation in the software and Internet
industries regarding intellectual property rights. It is possible that, in the
future, third parties may claim that we or our current or potential future
products infringe their intellectual property. We expect that software product
developers and providers of electronic commerce solutions will increasingly be
subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in
our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in industry
segments overlaps. Any infringement claims made against us, with or without
merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product
shipment delays or negative publicity. In addition, if our products were found
to infringe a third party's proprietary rights, we could be required to enter
into royalty or licensing agreements in order to continue to be able to sell
our products. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be
available on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Year 2000 Compliance Costs and Risks Are Difficult to Assess and Could
Result in Delay or Loss of Revenue, Diversion of Development Resources,
Damage to Our Reputation or Increased Service, Warranty or Litigation Costs
Our products are generally integrated into computer systems involving
sophisticated hardware and complex software products, which may not be year
2000 compliant. The failure of our customers' systems to be year
16
<PAGE>
2000 compliant could impede the success of applications that we have developed
for them. Accordingly, known or unknown defects that affect the operation of
our software, including any defects or errors in applications that include our
products, could result in delay or loss of revenue, diversion of development
resources, damage to our reputation or increased service, warranty or
litigation costs, any of which could harm our business.
In addition, earlier versions of our products may not be year 2000
compliant, and we do not intend to make them year 2000 compliant. We also need
to ensure year 2000 compliance of our own internal computer and other systems,
to continue testing our software products, and to audit the year 2000
compliance status of our suppliers and business partners. We have not
completed our year 2000 investigation and overall compliance initiative, and
the total cost of our year 2000 compliance may be substantial and may harm our
business. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations--Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure" on page 37 for a
discussion of the status of our year 2000 compliance review.
Provisions Contained in Our Charter Documents May Delay or Prevent a Change
in Our Control
Provisions of our Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of
Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us,
even if a change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions also may prevent changes in our management. See "Description of
Capital Stock--Antitakeover Effects of Delaware Law and Provisions of Our
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws" on page 67 for further discussion of
the specific provisions in our charter documents that may delay or prevent a
change in our control.
Risks Related to the Internet on Our Business and Prospects
If Use of the Internet Does Not Continue to Develop and Reliably Support
the Demands Placed on It by Electronic Commerce, We May Experience Loss of
Sales
Our success depends upon continued growth in the use of the Internet as a
medium of commerce. Although the Internet is experiencing rapid growth in the
number of users, this growth is a recent phenomenon and may not continue.
Furthermore, despite this growth in usage, the use of the Internet for
commerce is relatively new. As a result, a sufficiently broad base of
companies and their supply chain partners may not adopt or continue to use the
Internet as a medium of exchanging product content information. Our business
would be seriously harmed if:
. use of the Internet does not continue to increase or increases more
slowly than expected;
. the infrastructure for the Internet does not effectively support
enterprises and their supply chain partners;
. the Internet does not create a viable commercial marketplace, inhibiting
the development of electronic commerce and reducing the demand for our
products; or
. concerns over the secure transmission of confidential information over
public networks inhibit the growth of the Internet as a means of
conducting commercial transactions.
Capacity Restraints May Restrict the Use of the Internet as a Commercial
Marketplace, Resulting in Decreased Demand For Our Products
The Internet infrastructure may not be able to support the demands placed
on it by increased usage or the limited capacity of networks to transmit large
amounts of data. Other risks associated with commercial use of the Internet
could slow its growth, including:
. outages and other delays resulting from the inadequate reliability of the
network infrastructure;
. slow development of enabling technologies and complementary products; and
. limited availability of cost-effective, high-speed access.
Delays in the development or adoption of new equipment standards or
protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet activity, or
increased governmental regulation, could cause the Internet to lose its
17
<PAGE>
viability as a means of communication between manufacturers and their supply
chain partners. If these or any other factors cause use of the Internet for
commerce to slow or decline, the Internet may not prove viable as a commercial
marketplace, resulting in decreased demand for our products.
Increasing Governmental Regulation of the Internet Could Limit the Market
for Our Products
As Internet commerce continues to evolve, we expect that federal, state and
foreign governments will adopt laws and regulations covering issues such as
user privacy, taxation of goods and services provided over the Internet,
pricing, content and quality of products and services. It is possible that
legislation could expose companies involved in electronic commerce to
liability, taxation or other increased costs, any of which could limit the
growth of electronic commerce generally. Legislation could dampen the growth
in Internet usage and decrease its acceptance as a communications and
commercial medium. If enacted, these laws and regulations could limit the
market for our products.
Risks Related to This Offering
Our Executive Officers, Directors and Major Stockholders Will Retain
Significant Control Over Us After This Offering, Which May Lead to
Conflicts With Other Stockholders Over Corporate Governance Matters
After this offering, executive officers, directors and holders of 5% or
more of our outstanding common stock will, in the aggregate, own approximately
45.2% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders would be able to
significantly influence all matters requiring approval by our stockholders,
including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate
transactions. This concentration of ownership may also delay, deter or prevent
a change in our control and may make some transactions more difficult or
impossible to complete without the support of these stockholders.
Our Stock Price Has Been and May Continue to Be Extremely Volatile, Which
May Lead to Losses By Investors and to Securities Litigation
The stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
and the market prices of securities of technology companies, particularly
Internet-related companies including us, have been highly volatile. Investors
may not be able to resell their shares purchased in this offering at or above
the offering price. The market price of our common stock may decrease
significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our
control, including the following:
. variations in our quarterly operating results;
. announcements that our revenues or income are below securities
analysts' expectations;
. changes in securities analysts' estimates of our performance or
industry performance;
. changes in market valuations of similar companies;
. sales of large blocks of our common stock;
. the termination 91 days after the date of this offering with regard to
our principal and selling stockholders, directors and officers, and
the termination on February 16, 2000 with regard to some of our other
stockholders and the shareholders of Digital Market, of the lock-up
period during which these stockholders are not permitted to sell our
common stock acquired before our initial public offering; and
. fluctuations in stock market price and volume, which are particularly
common among highly volatile securities of software and Internet-based
companies.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted
against a company following periods of volatility in the company's stock
price. This type of litigation, if filed against us, could result in
substantial costs and could divert our management's attention and resources.
18
<PAGE>
Our Management Will Retain Broad Discretion in the Use of Proceeds From
This Offering and May Not Obtain a Significant Return on the Use of These
Proceeds
We currently have no specific plans for a significant portion of our net
proceeds from this offering. Consequently, our management has complete
discretion as to how to spend the proceeds from this offering. They may spend
these proceeds in ways with which our stockholders may not agree. Management's
allocation of the proceeds of this offering may not benefit our business and
the investment of the proceeds may not yield a favorable return.
Substantial Future Sales of Our Common Stock Could Cause Our Stock Price to
Decline
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock after this
offering could cause the market price of our common stock to decline by
potentially introducing a large number of sellers of our common stock into a
market in which our common stock price is already volatile. In addition, the
sale of these shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the
sale of additional equity securities. Based on shares outstanding as of
October 31, 1999, and including our acquisition of Digital Market, we will
have 22,617,200 shares of our common stock outstanding, or 22,954,700 shares
if the underwriters' overallotment is exercised in full. All of the 2,250,000
shares sold in this offering will be freely tradeable. Our directors,
executive officers, the selling stockholders and other principal stockholders
have executed lock-up agreements that limit their ability to sell shares of
our common stock. These stockholders have agreed, subject to limited
exceptions, not to sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of our common stock
for a period of time without the prior written approval of Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated. The lock-up agreements signed by our directors, officers and
principal and selling stockholders expire 91 days after the date of this
offering, and the lock-up agreements signed by our other stockholders expire
on February 16, 2000, at which time these shares and the shares of the common
stock underlying any options held by these individuals will become eligible
for sale, in some cases subject only to the volume, manner of sale and notice
requirements of Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. See "Shares Eligible
for Future Sale" on page 69 for further discussion of the shares that will be
freely tradeable after the date of this prospectus.
Investors in This Offering Will Suffer Immediate Dilution
We expect that the public offering price of our common stock in this
offering will be substantially higher than the net tangible book value per
share of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly, purchasers of common stock
in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
approximately $155.23 in net tangible book value per share, or approximately
92.5% of the assumed public offering price of $167 49/64 per share. In
contrast, our existing stockholders paid an average price of $5.15 per share.
Investors will incur additional dilution upon the exercise of outstanding
stock options and warrants. See "Dilution" on page 22 for further discussion
of the dilution that new investors will incur.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the information in this prospectus contains forward-looking
statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify
these statements by words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends,"
"plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates" and similar expressions. Because
these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual
results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements for a number of reasons, including those discussed
under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.
You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they
discuss our expectations about our future performance, contain projections of
our future operating results or our future financial condition, or state other
"forward-looking" information. Before you invest in our common stock, you
should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in these
risk factors and elsewhere in this prospectus could substantially harm our
business, results of operations and financial condition and that upon the
occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our common stock could
decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
19
<PAGE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of $196.4 million from the
sale of the 1,250,000 shares of common stock offered by us in this offering,
based upon an assumed public offering price of $167 49/64 per share and after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses of $13.3 million payable by us. If the underwriters' over-
allotment option is exercised in full, we estimate that our net proceeds will
be $249.7 million. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by
the selling stockholders.
We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering primarily for general
corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. We
may, if appropriate opportunities arise, use an undetermined portion of the
net proceeds to acquire or invest in complementary companies, product lines,
products or technologies. We do not currently have any agreements or
commitments with respect to any acquisition or investment other than Digital
Market and we are not currently involved in any negotiations with respect to
any such transaction. Pending these uses, the net proceeds of the offering
will be invested in short-term, interest-bearing investments or accounts.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate
paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain
any future earnings to develop and expand our business. Under the terms of our
line of credit facilities, we may not declare or pay any dividends without the
prior consent of the lenders under these facilities.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"AGIL" since August 20, 1999. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low bid quotations for the common stock as reported by
the Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common
Stock
Price
--------------
High Low
----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2000
Second Quarter (August 20, 1999 through October 31,
1999)................................................ $100 9/16 $34 1/4
Third Quarter (through December 9, 1999).............. 179 1/8 93 3/16
</TABLE>
On December 9, 1999, the reported last sale price on the Nasdaq National
Market for our common stock was $167 49/64 per share.
20
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of October 31, 1999:
. on an actual basis;
. on a pro forma basis to reflect the issuance of 611,765 shares of common
stock to the holders of all outstanding capital stock and warrants of
Digital Market in connection with our acquisition of Digital Market on
November 23, 1999; and
. on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect the application of the net
proceeds from the sale of 1,250,000 shares of common stock offered by us
in this offering, based upon an assumed public offering price of $167
49/64 per share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and the
exercise of warrants to purchase 57,190 shares of common stock.
The outstanding share information does not include 1,834,525 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options
granted under our 1995 Stock Option Plan with a weighted average exercise
price of $8.25 per share; 1,125,419 shares of common stock available for
issuance under our 1995 Stock Option Plan; 500,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under our 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and 41,111
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of an outstanding warrant at an
exercise price of $.354 per share. Of the total shares outstanding, 1,058,654
shares are subject to our right of repurchase.
You should read this table in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the
consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of October 31, 1999
-------------------------------
Pro Pro Forma
Actual Forma As Adjusted
-------- -------- -----------
(in thousands, except share
data)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Capital lease obligations and notes payable,
less current portion.......................... $ 858 $ 956 $ 956
-------- -------- --------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000
shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding actual, pro forma and pro forma
as adjusted................................. -- -- --
Common stock, $.001 par value;
100,000,000 shares authorized, 20,698,245
shares issued and outstanding actual;
21,310,010 shares issued and outstanding
pro forma, 22,617,200 shares issued and
outstanding pro forma as adjusted........... 21 21 23
Additional paid-in capital................... 134,488 221,488 418,021
Notes receivable from stockholders........... (1,826) (1,826) (1,826)
Unearned stock compensation.................. (19,066) (19,066) (19,066)
Accumulated deficit.......................... (34,892) (37,192) (37,192)
-------- -------- --------
Total stockholders' equity................. 78,725 163,425 359,960
-------- -------- --------
Total capitalization..................... $ 79,583 $164,381 $360,916
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
21
<PAGE>
DILUTION
Our net tangible book value at October 31, 1999 was approximately $78.7
million or approximately $3.80 per share. Net tangible book value per share
represents actual total assets less total liabilities, divided by the actual
number of shares outstanding as of October 31, 1999.
After giving effect to our sale of 1,250,000 shares of common stock in this
offering at an assumed public offering price of $167 49/64 per share, after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us, our net tangible book value as of October 31,
1999 would have been approximately $275.2 million, or $12.54 per share. This
represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $8.74 per share
to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value
of $155.23 per share to new investors purchasing shares in this offering. The
following table illustrates this per share dilution:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Assumed public offering price per share.......................... $167.77
Net tangible book value per share as of October 31, 1999....... $3.80
Increase in tangible book value per share attributable to new
investors..................................................... 8.74
-----
Net tangible book value per share after this offering............ 12.54
-------
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering............. $155.23
=======
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth, on a pro forma basis as of October 31,
1999, the difference between the existing stockholders and the purchasers of
shares in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $167 49/64 per
share, with respect to the number of shares of common stock purchased, the
total consideration paid and the average price per share paid, before
deduction of the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Purchased Total Consideration Average
------------------ -------------------- Price Per
Number Percent Amount Percent Share
---------- ------- ------------ ------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Existing stockholders......... 20,698,245 94.3% $106,584,000 33.7% $ 5.15
New stockholders.............. 1,250,000 5.7 209,712,500 66.3 167.77
---------- ----- ------------ -----
Totals...................... 21,948,245 100.0% $316,296,500 100.0%
========== ===== ============ =====
</TABLE>
The foregoing tables assume no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment
option and do not include the shares issued or consideration received in
exchange for the issuance of shares of our common stock in connection with our
acquisition of Digital Market on November 23, 1999. As of October 31, 1999,
there were options outstanding to purchase a total of 1,834,525 shares of
common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $8.25 per share under our
1995 Stock Option Plan. In addition, as of October 31, 1999, there were 98,301
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants at a
weighted average exercise price of $1.22 per share. Subsequent to October 31,
1999, warrants to purchase 57,190 shares of our common stock were exercised at
a weighted average exercise price of $1.85, which will result in further
dilution to new investors.
22
<PAGE>
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, our consolidated
financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The selected
consolidated statement of operations data for each of the three years in the
period ended April 30, 1999 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data
at April 30, 1998 and April 30, 1999, are derived from, and are qualified by
reference to, our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the
period from inception on March 13, 1995 to April 30, 1996 and the selected
consolidated balance sheet data as of April 30, 1996 and April 30, 1997 are
derived from consolidated financial statements not included in this
prospectus.
The consolidated statements of operations data for the six months ended
October 31, 1998 and 1999 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
October 31, 1999 are derived from unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of
management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial
statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of the results of these periods.
The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be
expected in any future period.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations data presents the
results of operations of Agile for the year ended April 30, 1999 and the six
months ended October 31, 1999, combined with the statement of operations of
Digital Market for the year ended March 31, 1999 and the six months ended
September 30, 1999, giving effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred as
of the beginning of the period presented. The unaudited pro forma combined
balance sheet data gives effect to the merger as if the transaction occurred
on October 31, 1999 and combines the unaudited balance sheet of Agile as of
October 31, 1999 and the unaudited balance sheet of Digital Market as of
September 30, 1999. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined information is
presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of
the operating results or financial position that would have occurred if the
transaction had been consummated at the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily
indicative of the future operating results or financial position of the
combined companies.
23
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pro Forma Six Months Pro Forma
Period from Fiscal Year Ended Six Months
March 13, 1995 Fiscal Year Ended April 30, Ended October 31, Ended
(Inception) to ----------------------------- April 30, ---------------- October 31,
April 30, 1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 1998 1999 1999
-------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- ------- ------- -----------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Statement
of Operations Data:
Revenues:
License............... $ 24 $ 1,143 $ 6,102 $ 10,859 $ 4,756 $ 8,339
Professional
services............. 14 187 1,385 3,665 1,471 2,165
Maintenance........... -- 22 516 2,283 826 2,321
------- -------- -------- --------- ------- -------
Total revenues....... 38 1,352 8,003 16,807 $ 18,293 7,053 12,825 $ 13,230
------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Cost of revenues:
License............... 2 113 543 819 406 528
Professional
services............. 4 88 1,347 3,823 1,546 1,726
Maintenance........... -- 65 278 1,343 543 924
------- -------- -------- --------- ------- -------
Total cost of
revenues............ 6 266 2,168 5,985 8,433 2,495 3,178 4,508
------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Gross profit............ 32 1,086 5,835 10,822 9,860 4,558 9,647 8,722
------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing... 198 2,149 8,070 13,495 15,358 5,990 10,013 11,220
Research and
development.......... 852 2,510 3,788 4,742 7,708 2,216 3,194 5,344
General and
administrative....... 381 1,333 1,995 1,938 2,764 870 1,505 2,190
Amortization of stock
compensation......... -- -- 856 2,253 2,253 945 3,658 3,658
In-process research
and development...... -- -- -- -- 1,300 -- -- --
Goodwill
amortization......... -- -- -- -- 35,232 -- -- 17,616
------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Total operating
expenses............ 1,431 5,992 14,709 22,428 64,615 10,021 18,370 40,028
------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Loss from operations.... (1,399) (4,906) (8,874) (11,606) (54,755) (5,463) (8,723) (31,306)
Interest income
(expense), net......... 72 70 (68) 178 290 150 364 58
------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Net loss................ $(1,327) $ (4,836) $ (8,942) $ (11,428) $(54,465) $(5,313) $(8,359) $(31,248)
======= ======== ======== ========= ======== ======= ======= ========
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted..... $ (1.94) $ (3.72) $ (4.20) $ (3.87) $ (15.28) $ (1.89) $ (.90) $ (3.16)
======= ======== ======== ========= ======== ======= ======= ========
Weighted average
shares............... 684 1,300 2,129 2,952 3,564 2,814 9,264 9,876
======= ======== ======== ========= ======== ======= ======= ========
Pro forma net loss per
share:
Basic and diluted..... $ (.78) $ (.50)
========= =======
Weighted average
shares............... 14,668 16,852
========= =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pro Forma
As of April 30, As of As of
----------------------------- October 31, October 31,
1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 1999
------ ------ ------ ------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Balance
Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents
and short-term
investments............ $3,829 $3,292 $2,160 $10,003 $81,174 $ 61,302
Working capital
(deficit).............. 3,747 2,617 (930) 4,174 76,210 50,409
Total assets............ 4,219 5,366 7,531 17,948 91,465 181,410
Long-term obligations... 152 626 782 3,224 858 956
Stockholders' equity.... 3,867 3,154 177 3,291 78,725 163,425
</TABLE>
24
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical
information, the discussion in this prospectus contains certain forward-
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking
statements due to factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth
under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We develop and market product content management software for the use
within and among companies in a manufacturing supply chain over the Internet.
Our suite of software products is designed to improve the ability of all
members of the supply chain to communicate and collaborate with one another
about new or changing information concerning the manufacture, source or supply
of products or components. We were founded in March 1995 and in June 1996 we
began selling our first products and delivering related services. We currently
license our products in the United States through our direct sales force, and
in Europe through our direct sales force and distributors. To date, revenues
from international sales have not been material. We have derived our revenues
principally from the licenses of our products, the delivery of professional
services and from maintenance contracts.
Customers who license our software products receive a license for our
application servers, one or more user licenses, and third-party provided
adapters to connect with the customer's other existing enterprise systems. Our
customers generally purchase a limited number of user licenses at the time of
the initial license of the software products and may purchase additional user
licenses as needed. Customers may purchase implementation services from us.
These professional services are generally provided on a fixed-price basis and
are often provided by third-party consulting organizations. We also offer fee-
based training services to our customers. As of October 31, 1999, over 98% of
our customers who licensed our products had purchased maintenance contracts,
which provide unspecified software upgrades, on a when-and-if available basis,
and technical support over a stated term, which is generally a twelve-month
period, and over 90% of our customers had renewed their maintenance contracts.
We cannot assure that we will continue to experience these rates of purchases
of maintenance agreements or renewals.
We recognize revenue under Statement of Position, or SOP, 97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition, and SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions. When contracts contain
multiple elements and vendor-specific objective evidence exists for all
undelivered elements, we account for the delivered elements in accordance with
the "Residual Method" prescribed by SOP 98-9. Software licenses sold to new
customers are recognized upon installation and acceptance by the customer.
Software licenses sold to existing customers, or add-on sales, do not include
acceptance provisions and are recognized upon shipment of the software
product. In the event we grant our customers the right to specified upgrades,
license revenue is deferred until delivery of the specified upgrade. If
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for the specified
upgrade, then an amount equal to this fair value is deferred. If vendor-
specific objective evidence of fair value does not exist, then the entire
license fee is deferred until the delivery of the specified upgrade. During
fiscal 1997, our first full year of operations, substantially all of our
license revenues were generated from new customers. License revenues generated
from new customers represented 79% of total revenues in fiscal 1998, 66% in
fiscal 1999, and 49% for the six months ended October 31, 1999, with the
remaining license revenues attributable to existing customers. Our
professional services revenues consist of implementation services which are
recognized upon customer acceptance and training revenues which are recognized
as the services are performed. Our maintenance revenues are recognized ratably
over the contract period, generally twelve months.
25
<PAGE>
Our cost of license revenues include royalties due to third parties for
integrated technology, the cost of manuals and product documentation,
production media used to deliver our products and packaging costs. Our cost of
professional services revenues include salaries and related expenses for the
implementation and training services organizations, costs of third parties
contracted to provide implementation services to customers and an allocation
of our overhead expenses. Our cost of maintenance revenues include salaries
and related expenses for the customer support organization and an allocation
of our overhead expenses. The cost of professional services can fluctuate
depending upon whether more or less of the professional services are provided
to our customers by us rather than by third-party service providers. We
generally provide implementation services to our customers on a fixed-price
basis. If we have to engage independent contractors or third parties to
provide these services on our behalf, it is generally at higher cost resulting
in a lower gross margin than if we had provided the services to our customers
ourselves. Therefore, our gross margin from professional services may
fluctuate based on who performs the services and the actual cost to provide
these services. Although services revenues may increase in absolute dollars if
we increase the professional services we provide, services revenues have lower
gross margins than license revenues. Our overall gross profit can therefore
fluctuate based on the mix of license revenues compared to professional
services revenues and maintenance revenues.
Our operating expenses are classified as sales and marketing, research and
development and general and administrative. We classify all charges to these
operating expense categories based on the nature of the expenditures. Although
each category includes expenses that are unique to the category type, there
are common recurring expenditures that are typically included in all operating
expenses categories, such as salaries, employee benefits, incentive
compensation, bonuses, travel costs, telephone, communication, rent and
allocated facilities costs and professional fees. The sales and marketing
category of operating expenses includes additional expenditures specific to
the marketing group, such as public relations and advertising, trade shows,
marketing collateral materials, and customer user group meetings and
expenditures specific to the sales group, such as commissions. To date, all
software development costs in research and development have been expensed as
incurred. Also included in our operating expenses is the amortization of stock
compensation described below.
On November 23, 1999, we acquired Digital Market in a merger transaction to
be accounted for as a purchase. The purchase price included $20.0 million in
cash and the issuance of 611,765 shares of our common stock, valued at
approximately $79.2 million, based upon our average stock price for a number
of days before and after the transaction measurement date. In addition, we
assumed all of the outstanding options to purchase the common stock of Digital
Market under its stock option plans. The estimated fair value of the assumed
options is approximately $7.8 million and was included as a component of the
purchase price. We also anticipate incurring approximately $2.0 million in
acquisition expenses. The total purchase price of Digital Market was $109.0
million.
The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair
values. The aggregate purchase price was allocated as follows, based upon a
preliminary independent appraisal of Digital Market (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Net tangible liabilities of Digital Market........................ $ (2,295)
In-process research and development............................... 1,300
Existing technology............................................... 2,050
Trademarks........................................................ 150
Workforce in place................................................ 2,100
Goodwill.......................................................... 105,695
--------
$109,000
========
</TABLE>
The net tangible liabilities of Digital Market consist primarily of cash
and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, property and equipment, accounts
payable and other liabilities and notes payable. In-process research
26
<PAGE>
and development has not reached the stage of technological feasibility at the
acquisition date and was immediately charged to operations. Existing
technology will be amortized over its estimated useful life of three years,
trademarks will be amortized over its estimated useful life of three years and
workforce in place will be amortized over its estimated useful life of four
years. The purchase price in excess of net tangible liabilities and
identifiable assets was allocated to goodwill and amortized over its expected
useful life of three years.
In connection with the granting of stock options to our employees and non-
employee consultants, we have recorded unearned stock compensation totaling
approximately $25.8 million through October 31, 1999, of which $19.1 million
remains to be amortized. This amount represents the difference between the
exercise price and the current estimated fair value of our common stock on the
date these stock options were granted. This amount is included as a component
of stockholders' equity and is being amortized by charges to operations over
the expected term of the options, consistent with the method described in
Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Interpretation No. 28. We
recognized amortization of unearned stock compensation of $856,000 for fiscal
1998, $2.3 million for fiscal 1999, $945,000 for the six months ended October
31, 1998 and $3.7 million for the six months ended October 31, 1999. The
amortization of the remaining unearned stock compensation at October 31, 1999
will result in additional charges to operations through fiscal 2005. We
calculated the minimum fair value of options to purchase 70,000 shares of our
common stock granted to non-employee consultants, which totals $6.4 million,
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as
prescribed by SFAS No. 123 with the following underlying assumptions: expected
volatility of 75%, risk-free interest rate of 5.9% and option terms of ten
years. We are accounting for these options under variable plan accounting and
therefore the expense associated with these options may fluctuate
significantly from quarter to quarter through fiscal 2005. The amortization of
stock compensation is classified as a separate component of operating expenses
in our consolidated statement of operations. We expect to grant options at
below market price to purchase shares of our common stock to certain of
Digital Market's employees who remain employed with us after the acquisition
is completed. If we make these below market grants, we will record additional
deferred stock compensation which will be amortized over the expected term of
the options.
Although our total revenues have increased from quarter to quarter, we have
incurred significant costs to develop our products and to recruit and train
personnel for our engineering, sales, marketing, professional services and
administration departments. As a result, we have incurred significant losses
since inception, and, as of October 31, 1999, had an accumulated deficit of
$34.9 million.
We intend to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, research
and development and general and administrative expenses. For example, we had
65 full-time employees as of April 30, 1997 compared to 103 at April 30, 1998,
156 at April 30, 1999 and 188 at October 31, 1999. In addition, Digital Market
had 49 employees as of October 31, 1999. We will seek to hire additional
employees in the future. We expect to continue to incur operating losses for
the foreseeable future. In order to achieve profitability, we will need to
increase our revenues significantly. Therefore, we cannot assure you that we
will ever attain or maintain profitability. Our expansion will also place
significant demands on our management and operational resources. To manage
this rapid growth and increased demands, we must improve existing and
implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls. We
must also hire, train, manage, retain and motivate qualified personnel. We
expect future expansion to continue to challenge our ability to hire, train,
manage, retain and motivate our employees.
In view of the rapidly changing nature of our market and our limited
operating history, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our
revenues and other operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should
not be relied upon as indications of future performance. Our historic revenue
growth rates are not necessarily sustainable or indicative of our future
growth.
27
<PAGE>
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the
periods indicated, expressed as a percentage of total revenues:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months
Fiscal Year Ended Ended
April 30, October 31,
----------------------- --------------
1997 1998 1999 1998 1999
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
License.......................... 84 % 76 % 65 % 67 % 65%
Professional services............ 14 17 22 21 17
Maintenance...................... 2 7 13 12 18
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Total revenues................. 100 100 100 100 100
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Cost of revenues:
License.......................... 8 7 5 6 4
Professional services............ 7 17 23 22 14
Maintenance...................... 5 3 8 7 7
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Total cost of revenues......... 20 27 36 35 25
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Gross profit....................... 80 73 64 65 75
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing.............. 159 101 80 85 78
Research and development......... 185 47 28 31 25
General and administrative....... 99 25 12 12 12
Amortization of stock
compensation.................... -- 11 13 14 28
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Total operating expenses....... 443 184 133 142 143
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Loss from operations............... (363) (111) (69) (77) (68)
Interest income (expense), net..... 5 (1) 1 2 3
------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Net loss........................... (358)% (112)% (68)% (75)% (65)%
====== ====== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
Six Months Ended October 31, 1998 and 1999
Revenues
Our total revenues for the six months ended October 31, 1999 were $12.8
million, representing an increase of $5.8 million, or 82%, from the revenues
of $7.1 million for the six months ended October 31, 1998. We had no customer
that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues for the quarter ended
October 31, 1999 or 1998.
License Revenues. Our license revenues for the six months ended October 31,
1999 were $8.3 million, representing an increase of $3.5 million, or 73%, from
the revenues of $4.8 million for the six months ended October 31, 1998. The
increase in our license revenues from the prior year's period was due to
increased market acceptance of our suite of products, including new versions
of our products. During the quarter ended July 31, 1999, we offered specified
upgrade rights to certain customers, which resulted in the deferral of
approximately $238,000 of license revenues. These specified upgrades were
delivered to our customers in the quarter ended October 31, 1999, and
accordingly, we recognized these license revenues in that quarter.
Professional Services Revenues. Our professional services revenues for the
six months ended October 31, 1999 were $2.2 million, representing an increase
of $700,000 or 47%, from the revenues of $1.5 million for the six months ended
October 31, 1998. Professional services revenues as a percentage of total
revenues were 17% for the six months ended October 31, 1999 and 21% for the
six months ended October 31, 1998. The increase in professional services
revenues in absolute dollars was due to increased license revenues and an
increased range
28
<PAGE>
of services, consisting of additional data migration and integration services.
To date, a portion of our professional services revenues relates to our
invoicing for services provided by third parties. In the future, we anticipate
that an increasing percentage of professional services will be provided by
third parties who will invoice the customer directly. As a result, we
anticipate that professional services revenues will decline as a percentage of
total revenues.
Maintenance Revenues. Our maintenance revenues were $2.3 million for the
six months ended October 31, 1999, representing an increase of $1.5 million,
or 81%, from the maintenance revenues of $826,000 for the six months ended
October 31, 1998. Maintenance revenues as a percentage of total revenues were
18% for the six months ended October 31, 1999 and 12% for the six months ended
October 31, 1998. The increase in maintenance revenues and maintenance
revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the six months ended October
31, 1999 compared to the six months ended October 31, 1998 was attributable to
increased licenses for our products.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of License Revenues. Cost of license revenues were $528,000 for the
six months ended October 31, 1999, representing an increase of $122,000, or
30%, from the cost of license revenues of $406,000 for the six months ended
October 31, 1998. The increased expenses were primarily due to the sub-
licensing of third-party software used in our products. Cost of license
revenues as a percentage of total license revenues has decreased as add-on
licenses, which have a higher gross margin than initial customer licenses,
have increased as a percentage of total license revenues.
Cost of Professional Services Revenues. Cost of professional services
revenues were $1.7 million for the six months ended October 31, 1999,
representing an increase of $180,000, or 12%, from the cost of professional
services revenues of $1.5 million for the six months ended October 31, 1998.
The increase in cost of our professional services revenues was primarily due
to an increase in professional services personnel to support the increased
customer base. In certain periods in the past, and potentially in the future,
our cost of professional services revenues exceeded our professional services
revenues, primarily because the actual cost of providing the services, whether
provided internally or through third parties, exceeded the fixed price payment
received from some of our customers. In addition, as we increase the size of
our professional services staff, costs are incurred for new personnel before
they become fully productive.
Cost of Maintenance Revenues. Cost of maintenance revenues were $924,000
for the six months ended October 31, 1999, representing an increase of 70%, or
$381,000, from the cost of maintenance revenues of $543,000 for the six months
ended October 31, 1998. The decrease in cost of maintenance revenues as a
percentage of maintenance revenues for the six months ended October 31, 1999
compared to the six months ended October 31, 1998 was due to economies of
scale realized as a result of increased management personnel and experienced
maintenance personnel.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $10.0 million for
the six months ended October 31, 1999, representing an increase of $4.0
million, or 67%, from the sales and marketing expenses of $6.0 million for the
six months ended October 31, 1998. Sales and marketing expenses as a
percentage of total revenues were 78% for the six months ended October 31,
1999 compared to 85% for the six months ended October 31, 1998. The increase
in sales and marketing expenses reflect significant personnel-related expenses
such as salaries, benefits and commissions, recruiting fees, travel expenses
and related costs of hiring sales management, sales representatives, sales
engineers and marketing personnel. We anticipate that our sales and marketing
expenses will increase in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we
expand our domestic and international sales force.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $3.2
million for the six months ended October 31, 1999, representing an increase of
$1.0 million, or 44% from the research and development expenses of $2.2
million for the six months ended October 31, 1998. Research and development
expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 25% for the six months ended
October 31, 1999, compared to 31% for the six
29
<PAGE>
months ended October 31, 1998. The increase in research and development
expenses for the six months ended October 31, 1999 compared to the
corresponding periods in the prior fiscal year was due to the increase in the
number of our software developers, quality assurance personnel and outside
contractors to support our product development, documentation and testing
activities related to the development and release of the latest versions of
our products. We anticipate that research and development expenses will
continue to increase in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we
continue to add to our research and development staff.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $1.5
million for the six months ended October 31, 1999, representing an increase of
$635,000, or 73%, from general and administrative expenses of $ 870,000 for
the six months ended October 31, 1998. General and administrative expenses as
a percentage of total revenues were 12% for both the six months ended October
31, 1999 and 1998. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due
to hiring additional finance, executive and administrative personnel to
support the growth of our business during the period. We expect that general
and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars for the
foreseeable future as we expand our operations and incur the normal costs of a
public company.
Amortization of Stock Compensation. We recognized amortization of stock
compensation of approximately $3.7 million for the six months ended October
31, 1999 compared to $945,000 for the six months ended October 31, 1998.
Interest Income (Expense), Net. Interest income (expense), net was $364,000
for the six months ended October 31, 1999, compared to $150,000 for the six
months ended October 31, 1998. This increase was due primarily to higher
interest income generated from the increase in cash and cash equivalents as a
result of our initial public offering. At April 30, 1999, we had unamortized
interest of $253,000 related to warrants issued in connection with
subordinated notes payable. We used a portion of the proceeds from our initial
public offering to repay these subordinated notes payable in their entirety on
August 31, 1999. As a result, we recognized the remaining unamortized interest
balance as an expense in the six months ended October 31, 1999.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our operating losses are generated
domestically, and amounts attributable to our foreign operations have been
insignificant for all periods presented. No provision for income taxes has
been recorded since our inception because we have incurred net losses in all
periods.
Fiscal Years Ended April 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999
Revenues
Our total revenues were $1.4 million for fiscal 1997, $8.0 million for
fiscal 1998 and $16.8 million for fiscal 1999, representing increases of $6.6
million, or 492%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and $8.8 million, or 110%,
from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. We had no customer that accounted for more
than 10% of our total revenues in fiscal 1997, fiscal 1998 or fiscal 1999.
License Revenues. Our license revenues were $1.1 million for fiscal 1997,
$6.1 million for fiscal 1998 and $10.9 million for fiscal 1999, representing
increases of $5.0 million, or 434%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and $4.8
million, or 78%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. License revenues as a
percentage of total revenues were 84% for fiscal 1997, 76% for fiscal 1998 and
65% for fiscal 1999. The increase in our license revenues from fiscal 1997 to
fiscal 1998 and from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999 was due to increased market
acceptance of our suite of products, including new versions of our products.
Professional Services Revenues. Our professional services revenues were
$187,000 for fiscal 1997, $1.4 million for fiscal 1998 and $3.7 million for
fiscal 1999, representing increases of $1.2 million, or 640%, from fiscal 1997
to fiscal 1998 and $2.3 million, or 165%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999.
Professional services revenues as a percentage of total revenues were 14% for
fiscal 1997, 17% for fiscal 1998 and 22% for fiscal 1999. The increase in
professional services revenues from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and from fiscal
1998 to fiscal 1999 reflects increased license revenues. The increase in
professional services revenues as a percentage of total
30
<PAGE>
revenues from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999
was due to an increased range of services, consisting of additional data
migration and integration services. To date, a portion of our professional
services revenues relates to our invoicing for services provided by third
parties. In the future, we anticipate that an increasing percentage of
professional services will be provided by third parties who will invoice the
customer directly. As a result, we anticipate that professional services
revenues will decline as a percentage of total revenues.
Maintenance Revenues. Our maintenance revenues were $22,000 for fiscal
1997, $516,000 for fiscal 1998 and $2.3 million for fiscal 1999, representing
increases of $494,000, or 2,245%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and $1.8
million, or 342%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. Maintenance revenues as a
percentage of total revenues were 2% for fiscal 1997, 7% for fiscal 1998 and
13% for fiscal 1999. The increase in maintenance revenues and maintenance
revenues as a percentage of total revenues from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 was
attributed to increased licenses of our products and from fiscal 1998 to
fiscal 1999 was due to increased licenses for our products, which accounted
for 53% of the increase, and to renewals of prior period maintenance
contracts, which accounted for 47% of the increase.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of License Revenues. Cost of license revenues were $113,000 for fiscal
1997, $543,000 for fiscal 1998 and $819,000 for fiscal 1999, representing
increases of $430,000, or 381%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and $276,000,
or 51%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. Cost of license revenues as a
percentage of license revenues were 10% for fiscal 1997, 9% for fiscal 1998
and 8% for fiscal 1999. Cost of license revenues increased from fiscal 1997 to
fiscal 1998 and from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999 due to increased expenses
associated with the sub-licensing of third-party software used in our
products. Cost of license revenues as a percentage of total license revenues
have decreased as add-on licenses, which have a higher gross margin than
initial customer licenses, have increased as a percentage of total license
revenues.
Cost of Professional Services Revenues. Cost of professional services
revenues were $88,000 for fiscal 1997, $1.3 million for fiscal 1998 and $3.8
million for fiscal 1999, representing increases of $1.2 million, or 1,431%,
from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and $2.5 million, or 184%, from fiscal 1998 to
fiscal 1999. Cost of services revenues as a percentage of services revenues
were 47% for fiscal 1997, 97% for fiscal 1998 and 104% for fiscal 1999. The
increase in cost and as a percentage of professional services revenues from
fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 was due to hiring and training a consulting
organization to implement our products. The increase in cost and as a
percentage of professional services revenues from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999
was due to an increase in third-party professional services personnel to
support the increased customer base. In certain periods in the past, and
potentially in the future, our cost of professional services revenues exceeded
our professional services revenues. This is generally because the actual cost
of providing the services, whether provided internally or through third
parties, exceeded the fixed price payment received from some of our customers.
In addition, as we increase the size of our professional services staff, costs
are incurred for new personnel before they become fully productive.
Cost of Maintenance Revenues. Cost of maintenance revenues were $65,000 for
fiscal 1997, $278,000 for fiscal 1998 and $1.3 million for fiscal 1999,
representing increases of $213,000, or 328%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998
and $1.0 million, or 383%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. Cost of
maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance revenues were 295% for
fiscal 1997, 54% for fiscal 1998 and 59% for fiscal 1999. The increase in cost
of maintenance revenues from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and from fiscal 1998
to fiscal 1999 was due to hiring and training a support organization needed in
connection with our increased customer base during these periods. The decrease
in cost of maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance revenues from
fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 was due to economies of scale realized as a result
of increased management personnel and experienced maintenance personnel. The
increase in the cost of maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance
revenues from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999 was due to expansion of the support
organization.
31
<PAGE>
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $2.1 million for
fiscal 1997, $8.1 million for fiscal 1998 and $13.5 million for fiscal 1999,
representing increases of $5.9 million, or 276%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal
1998 and $5.4 million, or 67%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. Sales and
marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 159% for fiscal
1997, 101% for fiscal 1998 and 80% for fiscal 1999. The increase in sales and
marketing expenses from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and from fiscal 1998 to
fiscal 1999 reflect significant personnel-related expenses such as salaries,
benefits and commissions, recruiting fees, travel expenses and related costs
of hiring sales management, sales representatives, sales engineers and
marketing personnel. Forty-nine percent of the increase in sales and marketing
expense from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 was due to additions to headcount and
personnel-related expenses. We anticipate that our sales and marketing
expenses will increase in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we
expand our domestic and international sales force.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $2.5
million for fiscal 1997, $3.8 million for fiscal 1998 and $4.7 million for
fiscal 1999, representing increases of $1.3 million, or 51%, from fiscal 1997
to fiscal 1998 and $954,000, or 25%, from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999. Research
and development costs as a percentage of total revenues were 185% for fiscal
1997, 47% for fiscal 1998 and 28% for fiscal 1999. The increases in research
and development expenses from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and from fiscal 1998
to fiscal 1999 were due to the increase in the number of our software
developers, quality assurance personnel and outside contractors to support our
product development, documentation and testing activities related to the
development and release of the latest versions of our products. We anticipate
that research and development expenses will continue to increase in absolute
dollars for the foreseeable future as we continue to add to our research and
development staff.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $1.3
million for fiscal 1997, $2.0 million for fiscal 1998 and $1.9 million for
fiscal 1999, representing an increase of $662,000, or 50%, from fiscal 1997 to
1998 and a decrease of $57,000, or 3%, from fiscal 1998 to 1999. General and
administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 99% for fiscal
1997, 25% for fiscal 1998 and 12% for fiscal 1999. The increase in costs from
fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 was due to hiring additional finance, executive and
administrative personnel to support the growth of our business during that
period. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in
absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we expand our operations and
incur the normal costs of a public company.
Amortization of Stock Compensation. During fiscal 1998 and fiscal 1999, we
recorded a total of approximately $8.1 million of unearned stock compensation.
We recognized amortization of stock compensation of $856,000 in fiscal 1998
and $2.3 million in fiscal 1999.
Interest Income (Expense), Net. Interest income (expense), net was $70,000
for fiscal 1997, $(68,000) for fiscal 1998 and, $178,000 for fiscal 1999.
Income Taxes. No provision for income taxes has been recorded since our
inception because we have incurred net losses in all periods. As of April 30,
1999, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax reporting
purposes of approximately $20.0 million that expire in various amounts
beginning in fiscal 2016. We also had net operating loss carryforwards for
state income tax reporting purposes of approximately$18.0 million that expire
in various amounts beginning in fiscal 2004. The U.S. tax laws contain
provisions that limit the use in any future period of net operating loss and
credit carryforwards upon the occurrence of certain events, including a
significant change in ownership interests. We had deferred tax assets,
including our net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits of
approximately $8.7 million as of April 30, 1999. A valuation allowance has
been recorded for the entire deferred tax asset as a result of uncertainties
regarding the realization of the asset balance. See note 4 of notes to
consolidated financial statements.
32
<PAGE>
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following tables set forth our unaudited consolidated statement of
operations data for each of the ten quarterly periods ended October 31, 1999,
as well as that data expressed as a percentage of our total revenues for the
quarters presented. You should read this information in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus. We have prepared this unaudited consolidated information on a
basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements, and, in
the opinion of our management, reflects all normal recurring adjustments that
we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and
operating results for the quarters presented. You should not draw any
conclusions about our future results from the operating results for any
quarter.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jul. 31, Oct. 31, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, Jul. 31, Oct. 31, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, Jul. 31, Oct. 31,
1997 1997 1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
License................ $ 926 $ 1,324 $ 1,543 $ 2,309 $ 2,270 $ 2,486 $ 2,898 $ 3,205 $ 3,654 $ 4,685
Professional services.. 213 254 419 499 655 816 976 1,218 1,159 1,006
Maintenance............ 40 91 166 219 316 510 718 739 1,077 1,244
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenues........ 1,179 1,669 2,128 3,027 3,241 3,812 4,592 5,162 5,890 6,935
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Cost of revenues:
License................ 79 124 119 221 165 241 211 202 223 305
Professional services.. 199 330 348 470 756 790 1,165 1,112 921 805
Maintenance............ 59 64 116 39 237 306 371 429 482 442
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total cost of
revenues............. 337 518 583 730 1,158 1,337 1,747 1,743 1,626 1,552
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit............ 842 1,151 1,545 2,297 2,083 2,475 2,845 3,419 4,264 5,383
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing.... 1,279 2,024 2,006 2,761 2,756 3,234 3,339 4,166 4,546 5,467
Research and
development........... 745 826 1,044 1,173 1,076 1,140 1,294 1,232 1,486 1,708
General and
administrative........ 428 448 481 638 431 439 492 576 753 752
Amortization of stock
compensation.......... -- 223 280 353 444 501 622 686 1,428 2,230
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating
expenses............. 2,452 3,521 3,811 4,925 4,707 5,314 5,747 6,660 8,213 10,157
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Loss from operations.... (1,610) (2,370) (2,266) (2,628) (2,624) (2,839) (2,902) (3,241) (3,949) (4,774)
Interest income
(expense), net......... (2) (26) (23) (17) 52 98 64 (36) (127) 491
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net loss................ $(1,612) $(2,396) $(2,289) $(2,645) $(2,572) $(2,741) $(2,838) $(3,277) $(4,076) $(4,283)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As a Percentage of Total Revenues
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 31, Oct. 31, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, Jul. 31, Oct. 31, Jan. 31, Apr. 30, Jul. 31, Oct. 31,
1997 1997 1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
License................ 79 % 79 % 72 % 76 % 70 % 65 % 63 % 62 % 62 % 68 %
Professional services.. 18 15 20 17 20 22 21 24 20 14
Maintenance............ 3 6 8 7 10 13 16 14 18 18
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Total revenues........ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Cost of revenues:
License................ 7 7 6 7 5 6 5 4 4 4
Professional services.. 17 20 16 16 24 21 25 22 16 12
Maintenance............ 5 4 5 1 7 8 8 8 8 6
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Total cost of
revenues............. 29 31 27 24 36 35 38 34 28 22
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Gross profit............ 71 69 73 76 64 65 62 66 72 78
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing.... 109 121 94 91 85 85 73 80 77 79
Research and
development........... 63 50 49 39 33 30 28 24 25 25
General and
administrative........ 36 27 23 21 13 11 11 11 13 11
Amortization of stock
compensation.......... -- 13 13 12 14 13 13 14 24 32
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Total operating
expenses............. 208 211 179 163 145 139 125 129 139 147
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Loss from operations.... (137) (142) (106) (87) (81) (74) (63) (63) (67) (69)
Interest income
(expense), net......... -- (2) (2) -- 2 2 1 -- (2) 7
---- ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Net loss................ (137)% (144)% (108)% (87)% (79)% (72)% (62)% (63)% (69)% (62)%
==== ==== ==== === === === === === === ===
</TABLE>
Revenues. Our total revenues increased in each of the ten quarterly periods
ended October 31, 1999. The increase in revenues in these periods reflects the
increase in the number of customers and increased sales following our December
1998 release of a new version of our product suite. License revenues in the
first quarter of fiscal 1999 decreased 2% from the fourth quarter of fiscal
1998 due to the effect of our sales commission plan providing increased
bonuses for sales in the last quarter of fiscal 1998. Although in future
periods first quarter license revenues could be lower than the level achieved
in the preceding fourth quarter due to year-end sales efforts, we are unable
to determine if this is a historical trend. Professional services revenues
declined in the quarterly periods ended July 31, 1999 and October 31, 1999 as
a result of our expected increased reliance on third party service providers.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues increased in each of the eight quarterly
periods ended April 30, 1999 as a result of the growth of revenues. In the
quarters ended July 31, 1998 and January 31, 1999, cost of professional
services as a percentage of total professional services revenues significantly
increased due to lower margin third-party implementation projects and losses
on certain implementation projects. Cost of professional services revenues
decreased in the quarterly periods ended July 31, 1999 and October 31, 1999 as
a result of the increased reliance on third party service providers mentioned
above.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses generally increased significantly in
each of the ten quarterly periods ended October 31, 1999 as a result of
increased sales and marketing expenses associated with higher
34
<PAGE>
numbers of personnel, use of independent contractors and other third parties
for development of our products, recruiting and related hiring expenses for
additional senior management in our research and development, administrative,
sales and marketing organizations and amortization of stock compensation. In
addition, sales and marketing expenses increased significantly in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1998 and fiscal 1999 due to commissions and other
compensation paid to the direct sales force for the attainment of sales
quotas. Although general and administrative expenses declined slightly from
the quarter ended July 31, 1999 to October 31, 1999, we expect general and
administrative expenses to increase as a result of our acquisition of Digital
Market.
Our quarterly operating results have varied widely in the past, and we
expect that they will continue to fluctuate in the future as a result of a
number of factors, many of which are outside our control. We believe that our
period-to-period operating results are not meaningful, and you should not rely
on them as indicative of our future performance. You should also evaluate our
prospects in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties commonly
encountered by comparable early-stage companies in new and rapidly emerging
markets. We might not successfully address the risks and challenges that face
us. In addition, although we have experienced significant revenue growth
recently, our revenue might not continue to grow and we might not become or
remain profitable in the future. Our future operating results will depend on
many factors, including:
. our successful integration of Digital Market, its Digital Buyer product,
technologies, computer systems and employees;
. size and timing of sales and installations of our products;
. entry of new competitors into our market, or the announcement of new
products or product enhancements by competitors;
. our ability to successfully expand our direct sales force and our
international sales organization;
. changes in our sales force incentives;
. unexpected delays in developing and marketing new and enhanced products;
. deferral of customer orders in anticipation of product enhancements or
new products;
. unexpected decline in purchases by our existing customers, including
purchases of additional licenses and maintenance contracts;
. delays in our customers' orders due to their year 2000 priorities;
. variability in the mix of our license and professional service revenues;
. our ability to accurately price fixed-priced professional services
projects;
. variability in the mix of professional services that we perform versus
those performed for our customers by others; and
. our ability to establish and maintain relationships with our third-party
implementation partners.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In August 1999, we completed an initial public offering of 3,450,000 shares
of our common stock, including the exercise of the underwriters' overallotment
option, at $21.00 per share. Net proceeds to us, before offering expenses,
were $67.4 million, or $19.53 per share. Simultaneous with the closing of the
initial public offering, we sold an aggregate of 665,641 shares of our common
stock at $19.53 per share in a private placement to Dell Computer Corporation,
Flextronics International Ltd. and Marshall Industries (now owned by Avnet,
Inc.). Net proceeds from sales of common stock in the private placement were
$13.0 million. We used $20.0 million of the proceeds from our initial public
offering to pay the cash portion of the consideration payable by us in our
acquisition of Digital Market. Prior to our initial public offering, we raised
$26.2 million of equity capital from the sale of preferred stock, net of
issuance costs, which was the primary source of financing for our operations.
35
<PAGE>
As of October 31, 1999, we had cash and cash equivalents of $81.2 million,
an increase from $10.0 million of cash and cash equivalents held as of April
30, 1999. Our working capital at October 31, 1999 was $76.2 million.
We have a $5.0 million senior line of credit facility with a bank that
bears interest at 8.5% and expires on August 31, 2000. At October 31, 1999, no
balance was outstanding under this line of credit. This line of credit is
secured by accounts receivable and certain other assets. Capital lease
obligations, including both short-term and long-term portions, were $1.6
million at October 31, 1999, and are payable through fiscal 2003. Our senior
line of credit requires us to maintain certain monthly financial covenants,
including a minimum tangible net worth and a minimum quick ratio. We were in
compliance with all of our financial covenants at October 31, 1999.
We also have noncancelable operating leases for office space and equipment
of approximately $2.2 million at October 31, 1999 which are payable through
fiscal 2003.
Our operating activities resulted in net cash outflows of $4.2 million for
fiscal 1997, $6.4 million for fiscal 1998, $5.1 million for fiscal 1999, $3.3
million for the six months ended October 31, 1998 and $4.1 million for the six
months ended October 31, 1999.
Investing activities used cash of $728,000 for fiscal 1997, provided cash
of $2.6 million for fiscal 1998, and used cash of $459,000 for fiscal 1999,
$297,000 for the six months ended October 31, 1998 and $1.5 million for the
six months ended October 31, 1999. Net cash provided by investing activities
for fiscal 1998 consisted of proceeds from the sale of short-term investments
offset by cash used to acquire property and equipment. Net cash outflows were
due to the acquisition of property and equipment. We expect that capital
expenditures will continue to increase to the extent we continue to increase
our headcount and expand our operations.
Financing activities provided cash of $4.0 million in fiscal 1997, $5.7
million in fiscal 1998, $13.4 million in fiscal 1999, $10.7 million for the
six months ended October 31, 1998 and $76.7 million for the six months ended
October 31, 1999. Cash was provided for in these periods primarily from the
issuance of preferred stock and debt and capital lease borrowings, and in the
six months ended October 31, 1999, from our initial public offering.
Purchases of property and equipment, including equipment purchased under
capital leases, were approximately $1.1 million in fiscal 1997, $1.3 million
in fiscal 1998, $1.5 million in fiscal 1999, $719,000 for the six months ended
October 31, 1998 and $1.9 million for the six months ended October 31, 1999.
These expenditures were primarily for computer hardware and software and
furniture and fixtures. We expect that capital expenditures will continue to
increase to the extent we continue to increase our headcount or expand our
operations.
We currently anticipate that we will continue to experience significant
growth in our operating expenses for the foreseeable future as we:
. enter new markets for our products;
. increase research and development spending;
. increase our sales and marketing activities; and
. enhance our operational and financial systems.
We currently anticipate that the net proceeds from this offering, together
with our current cash, cash equivalents and available credit facilities, will
be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and
capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. However, we may need to
raise additional funds in future periods through public or private financings,
or other sources, to fund our operations and potential acquisitions, if any,
until we achieve profitability, if ever. We may not be able to obtain adequate
or favorable financing at that time. Failure to raise capital when needed
could harm our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of
equity securities, the percentage of ownership of our stockholders would be
reduced. Furthermore, these equity securities might have rights, preferences
or privileges senior to our common stock.
36
<PAGE>
Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure
Many currently installed computer systems are not capable of distinguishing
21st century dates from 20th century dates or have been programmed with
default dates ending in 99, the common two-digit reference for 1999. As a
result, as we transition from the 20th century to the 21st century, computer
systems and software used by many companies and organizations in a wide
variety of industries will produce erroneous results or fail unless they have
been modified or upgraded to process date information correctly. Significant
uncertainty exists in the software industry and other industries concerning
the scope and magnitude of problems associated with the year 2000 issue.
State of Readiness. We have completed our initial assessment of the
potential overall impact of the impending century change on our business.
Based on our current assessment, we believe the current versions of our
software products are year 2000 compliant, although prior versions may not be
year 2000 compliant. By year 2000 compliant, we mean that our software
products, when used with accurate date data and in accordance with their
associated documentation, are capable of properly processing date data from,
into and between the 20th and 21st centuries, including the years 1999, 2000
and leap years, provided that all other products, e.g., hardware, software and
firmware, used with our products properly exchange date data with them.
However, our products are generally integrated into enterprise systems
involving sophisticated hardware and complex software products that we cannot
adequately evaluate for year 2000 compliance. We may face claims based on year
2000 problems in other companies' products, or issues arising from the
integration of multiple products within an overall system even if our products
are otherwise year 2000 compliant. Although we have not been a party to any
litigation or arbitration proceeding involving our products or services
related to year 2000 compliance issues, we may in the future be required to
defend our products or services in these proceedings, or to negotiate
resolutions of claims based on year 2000 issues. The costs of defending and
resolving year 2000-related disputes, regardless of the merits of these
disputes, and any liability we have for year 2000-related damages, including
consequential damages, could substantially harm our business.
In addition, we believe that the purchasing patterns of customers and
potential customers may be affected by year 2000 issues, as companies expend
significant resources to correct or upgrade their current software systems for
year 2000 compliance and as they delay purchase of new systems that may not be
year 2000 compliant. These expenditures may result in reduced funds available
to purchase software products such as those we offer. To the extent year 2000
issues cause a significant delay in, or cancellation of, decisions to purchase
our products or services, our business would be substantially harmed.
We are currently reviewing our internal management information and other
computer systems to identify any year 2000 problems, and are beginning to
communicate with the external vendors that supply us with material software
and information systems and with our significant suppliers to determine their
year 2000 readiness. We have not completed our year 2000 investigation and
overall compliance initiative.
Costs. To date, we have not incurred any material costs directly associated
with our year 2000 compliance efforts, except for compensation expenses
associated with our salaried employees who have devoted some of their time to
our year 2000 assessment and remediation efforts. We do not expect the total
cost of year 2000 problems to be material to our business. However, during the
months prior to the century change, we will continue to evaluate new versions
of our software products, new software and information systems provided to us
by third parties and any new infrastructure systems that we acquire to
determine whether they are year 2000 compliant. Despite our current
assessment, we may not identify and correct all significant year 2000 problems
on a timely basis. Year 2000 compliance efforts may involve significant time
and expense and unremediated problems could substantially harm our business.
We currently have no contingency plans to address the risks associated with
unremediated year 2000 problems.
Risks. We are not currently aware of any year 2000 readiness problems
relating to our internally-developed proprietary systems that would
substantially harm our business. We may discover year 2000 readiness problems
in these systems that will require substantial revision. In addition, third-
party software, hardware or
37
<PAGE>
services incorporated into our material systems may need to be revised or
replaced, all of which could be time-consuming and expensive. Our failure to
fix or replace our internally developed proprietary software or third-party
software, hardware or services on a timely basis could result in lost
revenues, increased operating costs, the loss of customers and other business
interruptions, any of which could substantially harm our business. Moreover,
our failure to adequately address year 2000 readiness issues in our internally
developed proprietary software could result in claims of mismanagement,
misrepresentation or breach of contract and related litigation, which could be
costly and time-consuming to defend.
In addition, governmental agencies, utility companies, Internet access
companies, third-party service providers and others outside of our control may
not be year 2000 ready. The failure by these entities to be year 2000 ready
could result in a systemic failure beyond our control, such as a prolonged
Internet, telecommunications or electrical failure, which could also prevent
us from delivering our services to our customers, decrease the use of the
Internet or prevent users from accessing web sites.
Contingency Plan. As discussed above, we are engaged in an ongoing year
2000 assessment and have not yet developed any contingency plans. The results
of our year 2000 simulation testing and the responses received from third-
party vendors and service providers will be taken into account in determining
the nature and extent of any contingency plans we adopt.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or
AICPA, issued Statement of Position, or SOP, 98-1, Accounting for the Cost of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. SOP 98-1 will be
effective for our fiscal year ending April 30, 2000. SOP 98-1 provides
guidance on accounting for computer software developed or obtained for
internal use including the requirement to capitalize and amortize specified
costs. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material
impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard,
or SFAS, 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts and for hedging activities. SFAS 133 will be effective for our
fiscal year ending April 30, 2001. The adoption of SFAS is not expected to
have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows in the foreseeable future.
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We develop products in the United States and market our products in North
America, and to a lesser extent in the Europe and Asia Pacific regions. As a
result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in
foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign
markets. Because all of our revenues are currently denominated in U.S.
dollars, a strengthening of the dollar could make our products less
competitive in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in
the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of
our investments are in short-term instruments. Due to the short-term nature of
our investments, we believe that there is not a material risk exposure.
38
<PAGE>
BUSINESS
The following description of Agile's business should be read in conjunction
with the information included elsewhere in this prospectus. This description
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Agile's actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed
in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in
"Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We develop and market product content management software for use over the
Internet within and among companies in a manufacturing supply chain. Our suite
of products is designed to improve the ability of supply chain members to
communicate and collaborate with one another about new or changing product
content. We believe that our products are well-suited for participants
connected in outsourced supply chains, as well as those managing multi-site
engineering, manufacturing, sales and distribution via the Internet. Since
June 1996, when we shipped our first product, we have licensed our products to
over 350 customers in the computers and peripherals, components, consumer
electronics, data networking and telecommunications equipment, electronics
manufacturing, medical equipment and semiconductor equipment markets. Our
current customers in these markets include Gateway, Texas Instruments,
Phillips Mobile Computing, Lucent Technologies, Solectron, GE Marquette
Medical Systems and FSI International.
Industry Background
The competitive environment for companies engaged in the manufacture and
supply of products has intensified dramatically and expanded globally in
recent years. This trend has been driven principally by productivity
improvements arising from advances in technology and growing customer
expectations for feature-rich products delivered quickly and at competitive
prices. To remain competitive, companies are adopting new strategies to
address these challenges.
Many companies are shifting from traditional manufacturing approaches,
where a manufacturer controls most phases of the manufacturing process from
raw materials to finished goods, to a manufacturing process where much or all
of the manufacturing process is outsourced to multiple companies as part of a
supply chain.
By outsourcing their production, some companies have created supply chains
that are more efficient, dynamic and flexible than manufacturing operations
that control all phases of the manufacturing process. Use of the outsourced
supply chain has afforded companies the flexibility to choose top suppliers
and partners to make each link in the supply chain more competent, innovative
and productive. As companies operate on a global basis, supply chains can span
multiple continents, tying suppliers in one part of the world with a plant in
another to serve customers in a third location. The end result is that
companies can bring their products to market more efficiently while at the
same time achieving higher levels of customer satisfaction.
Managing the Outsourced Supply Chain
A critical aspect of managing the outsourced supply chain across multiple
suppliers is finding effective ways to store, access, and share information
within the company as well as with all supply chain partners during each stage
of the production process. Different stages of the production process generate
many complex types of data that need to be shared across the supply chain.
There are many types of data and a vast number of information flows that can
occur in the production process.
Product Content. During the product design stage, the company must
communicate large amounts of data within the company as well as to supply
chain partners. The company begins by designating the content of the finished
product with a list of components known as the bill of materials. The
components on this list can be divided into two classes: "buy" or "make." For
the "buy" components, also called off-the-shelf components, specifications for
each part must be determined and information must be collected and analyzed to
determine if the available components meet the required specifications. Once
eligible components have been selected, the
39
<PAGE>
manufacturers of the parts are incorporated into the approved manufacturers
list. For customized, or "make" components, other data are created, including:
. assembly drawings, detailing precisely how the component should be
fabricated;
. work instructions, which guide the manual assembly process;
. machine instructions, to drive automated manufacturing and assembly
equipment;
. art work, for processes such as printed circuit board fabrication;
. schematics, for describing electronic components and assemblies; and
. test instructions, which enable the suppliers and original equipment
manufacturers to test for conformity to the manufacturer's
specifications.
New Product Introduction. Prior to volume production, the data created
during the product design stage must be communicated to each relevant party in
the supply chain. One of the complexities of the outsourced supply chain model
is that supply chain members often have multiple discrete roles, including
sourcing parts, fabrication, assembling components, testing and delivery. In
addition, the manufacture of a product such as a personal computer can include
several hundred suppliers. Ensuring that accurate product information is
disseminated promptly and to the correct parties is one of the most difficult
challenges for a company employing the outsourced supply chain model. Further,
suppliers may often discover constraints and/or opportunities for improvements
during the prototyping and pilot production phases. This often prompts a
flurry of product changes that requires rapid collaboration among supply chain
partners to avoid delays and excessive start-up or inventory costs.
Volume Production and Product Changes. Product specifications frequently
change even during volume production. This can occur due to a number of
reasons, including:
. changes in design in response to customer requests or market conditions;
. changes required to address a defect in the design or to improve the
manufacturing process; and
. changes in the costs or availability of components.
The communication of information regarding product changes is a dynamic
loop in which members of the supply chain must respond to market-dictated
demands while also reacting to information being shared among supply chain
partners. Whatever the reason for the change, executing it through the
manufacturing process expeditiously and effectively, while minimizing cost, is
a complex problem. To change a design requires:
. creating an engineering change order;
. developing the specifications required by the engineering change order;
. securing the necessary approvals to effect the change; and
. communicating the change to the supply chain.
This problem is especially complex for companies operating in a market
where product specifications or volume requirements may be changing
continuously. For example, the requirements of a personal computer
manufacturer that builds products to order may change continuously during each
day as information regarding orders is received from customers or its sales
force.
To address these challenges, many companies have implemented software
systems that govern supply chain management, electronic data interchange,
product data management and enterprise resource planning. However, many of
these products were not designed to interconnect multiple companies in an
outsourced supply chain, and therefore do not fully address the need for
supply chain collaboration. Electronic data interchange, a software system
that facilitates interconnection and exchange of data, is expensive to install
and maintain and therefore is viable only to large organizations that can
justify the cost. Other methods of communication and collaboration
40
<PAGE>
within the supply chain, including phone, paper-based solutions such as
courier or fax, or e-mail or web page sources, are not linked in real-time and
are slow, incomplete and often inaccurate.
As product changes become more frequent and time to market becomes
increasingly important, the ability to manage this process effectively becomes
critical to a company's competitiveness. A company that can disseminate
information quickly and accurately to the appropriate supply chain partners
may be in a position to compete effectively. However, a company that is agile
and can effectively collaborate with its supply chain partners in real time
can gain competitive advantage. For example, through collaboration with its
supply chain partners, a company may learn that a component is not readily
available due to lack of supply or that a new component is available which
might substantially reduce costs or improve manufacturing efficiencies.
Instead of continuing to rely on the originally selected component, the
company can respond by incorporating another component in the product design
and notify partners before these components are incorporated into new
products. By doing so, the company has the opportunity to increase revenues by
maintaining product availability or increase profits by taking advantage of
lower cost components more quickly.
Impact of the Internet
The Internet, as a fast growing communications network, is changing the way
businesses communicate and share information and creating new and evolving
ways for conducting commerce. The typical corporate web site is evolving from
a mere repository for information regarding products into a medium for
conducting business. According to Forrester Research, its research indicates
that business-to-business electronic commerce is expected to grow to $1.3
trillion in 2003, accounting for more than 90% of the dollar value of
electronic commerce in the United States. This market is expected to create
substantial demand for Internet and intranet-based commerce applications.
However, we cannot be certain that this projection will be met.
Companies that have successfully implemented strategies to communicate with
their customers over the Internet now face the challenge of utilizing the
Internet and intranets to gain the same level of increased efficiencies in
their supply chain. An Internet-based software solution can offer scalability,
easier implementation, compatibility across diverse information technology
platforms and reduced incremental infrastructure investments. However, many
companies are wary of major software development projects due to the cost and
complications of enterprise application development projects undertaken in
recent years. To compete effectively, companies must implement a solution
which will allow them to interactively communicate information related to
product design, development and manufacturing within the company and will
allow them to collaborate with their supply chain partners. At the same time,
companies want to be able to implement new software systems without the need
to burden already over-taxed internal information technology staffs while
avoiding costs of outside consulting and minimizing incremental
infrastructure-related expenses.
The Agile Solution
Our product content management software is designed to improve the ability
of supply chain members to communicate and collaborate with one another over
the Internet about new or changing product content. Our solution is designed
for use over the Internet, reduces dependence upon traditional methods of
interaction, and allows supply chain members to link to each other without
requiring substantial investments in additional technology infrastructure. We
have also designed our products to allow for rapid implementation by the
manufacturer with limited consulting assistance and by supply chain members
with minimal technical expertise.
We believe that our products are well-suited for participants in outsourced
supply chains connected via the Internet, as well as those managing multi-site
engineering, manufacturing and sales and distribution. The Agile solution
delivers the following benefits to companies and their supply chain partners:
Enhanced Productivity and Response Time. With the help of our solution,
Agile Anywhere, and the Internet, companies can respond more rapidly to
changes in customer demand, availability of components, market conditions and
manufacturing capacities arising throughout the production cycle. This ability
to effect change even during volume production allows Agile Anywhere users to
adjust production strategies, enabling
41
<PAGE>
companies to produce what they can sell, rather than sell what they can
produce. Agile Anywhere also enables companies to enhance their sales
productivity by being first to market with the right product.
More Cost-Effective Production. The Agile Anywhere suite of products is
designed to help companies increase output, reduce inventory and compress the
time required to complete the production cycle. Through effective
collaboration, both time to market and design effectiveness can be improved.
Companies can benefit by reducing design and production errors due to
miscommunication within the supply chain, and can decrease operating
inefficiencies incurred when obsolete parts are specified and incorrectly
built products must be scrapped.
More Rapid Return on Investment. Because Agile Anywhere is based on
existing industry standards and does not require the implementation of custom
data models, Agile Anywhere implementations can be completed in less time than
required for traditional enterprise software applications which tend to
require extensive customization.
The Agile Growth Strategy
Our objective is to be the leading provider of product content management
software, enabling business-to-business global collaboration among supply
chain partners. Key elements of our strategy include:
Provide Superior Customer Satisfaction. We expect to continue to build a
highly referenceable customer base of market leaders in various vertical
markets. We intend to continue to focus significant resources on customer
satisfaction programs. We intend to continue to anticipate customer needs by
introducing new product functionality and new technology platforms. We believe
this focus can help create high levels of customer loyalty, which can provide
follow-on sales opportunities and shorter sales cycles.
Capitalize on Network Effects to Expand Our Customer Base. As users of
Agile Anywhere deploy our software across their supply chains, additional
supply chain members will be exposed to our solution and the functionality
provided by our products. We believe that this exposure, which allows non-
customer participants in the supply chain to benefit from our solution first
hand, creates a network effect that accelerates industry recognition and
adoption of our products. As additional members of a supply chain deploy Agile
Anywhere, the quality and timeliness of available information improves, which
increases the value to each participant and helps drive greater usage.
Pursue a Vertical Market Strategy. Since inception, we have pursued a
vertical market strategy, developing product features tailored for particular
industries. To date, we have focused on various electronics market segments,
including data communications, computers and peripherals, and the medical
device market. We seek to further penetrate our current markets while
addressing new vertical markets characterized by high rates of product change,
short product cycles, and extensive supply chains.
Leverage Our Technology Platform. We intend to continue to pioneer new
Internet business applications based on emerging standards supporting
electronic commerce. For instance, we have leveraged the Java computer
programming language to deliver a robust, powerful and rapidly deployable
Internet business application to our customers. Further, we have taken the
initiative to define a protocol for supply chains, Product Definition
eXchange, or PDX, based on eXtensible Mark-up Language, or XML, and have
submitted it to industry standards groups for approval. We intend to lead
technological innovation in the product content management market, offering
our customers solutions designed to provide a rapid and high return on
investment.
Extend Supply Chain Collaboration and Functionality. We believe our
solution provides a robust platform to enable us to extend the functionality
and application of our products to the creation and delivery of new value-
added applications. We intend to continue to develop our products to enable
increased collaboration among outsourced supply chain partners and to address
new opportunities that result from new business processes that are being
created for Internet-based collaboration and interaction among supply chain
partners. For example, our
42
<PAGE>
acquisition of Digital Market will extend the functionality of our solutions
to the sourcing and procurement of electronic production materials. By adding
the direct procurement capabilities of Digital Market's products to Agile
Anywhere, we believe that our customers will be able to enhance critical
supply chain processes, including new product introductions and direct
material procurement.
The Agile Suite of Products
The Agile Anywhere suite of products provides a comprehensive business-to-
business solution to the problem of product change collaboration across the
manufacturing supply chain. Utilizing XML technology, Agile Anywhere will
allow supply chain partners to share and collaborate on product content and
changes in real time via the Internet. Agile Anywhere is designed to provide
the scalability, security and open standards that are required in an
electronic supply chain. At the core of the Agile Anywhere suite is the Agile
eHub, which manages product content, processes and business rules. Users
interact with the product content within the eHub via the My Agile portal.
Enterprises that manage and create the product content interact with the Agile
iCM client. Utilizing the Agile eXpress Viewer, product content can also be
published to users anywhere throughout the supply chain. To complete the
suite, Agile provides several integration products that import, export, and
publish product content from or to existing design, manufacturing, finance,
and supply chain systems. Following the initial implementation of Agile
Anywhere, licenses for additional concurrent users and application-specific
modules can be added to expand the scope of the manufacturer's
implementations.
In our latest release, available since July 1999, we have renamed our
product suite "Agile Anywhere." Previously known as Agile Workplace, our
latest release retains all of the core technology and functionality provided
by earlier releases, but adds significant enhancements to the number of users
that can be accommodated, and the speed and performance of our solutions.
Agile Anywhere also incorporates additional security features, and provides
enhanced capabilities for the transmission and exchange of data and
integration with other software applications, allowing for further
collaboration capabilities among supply chain partners.
As part of the enhancements, individual products in the suite have been
renamed, and Agile eXpress Viewer and a software development kit have been
included as new products in the suite. All products in the suite are available
separately or in connection with other products in the suite.
Agile eHub
The foundation of the suite is Agile eHub. The Agile eHub is comprised of
application servers that enable users to define, store, change and manage
product content information. Agile eHub incorporates new technology for high
speed performance, storage and secure data, and is designed to scale to
accommodate the needs of supply chain partners of all sizes. It is also
designed to facilitate fast, direct Internet access, and is easily
implemented. Agile eHub includes one or more of the following server modules:
Agile Product Definition Server, previously Agile Configurator, manages
parts, documents, bills of materials and drawings, in a web environment that
provides fast, easy access to product content for all members of the supply
chain.
Agile Product Change Server, previously Agile CCB, automates the electronic
routing, notification and sign-off processes that are associated with
engineering changes. This functionality can result in reduced ordering errors
and costs and improved cycle times associated with evaluating, approving and
implementing changes.
Agile AML Server, previously Agile Parts, enables companies to collaborate
with supply chain partners on approved parts and manufacturers at the time of
new product introduction as well as tracking changes throughout the
manufacturing process.
Agile Administrator enables companies to easily and rapidly configure and
modify Agile Anywhere components without writing code. Agile Administrator,
which has not been renamed, speeds the implementation of the Agile Anywhere
suite and minimizes maintenance time.
43
<PAGE>
Accessing Agile eHub
Agile customers and their supply chain partners can gain access to product
content for review or modification by the following:
Agile iCM (Internet Content Manager) is designed for individuals who have
responsibility for managing a product and its content through its entire
lifecycle. This functionality is also provided through Agile CM, a module
designed for Windows-based applications.
My Agile includes a web portal to allow secure, personalized web access to
product content that is stored in any Agile eHub. It is an intuitive, easy-to-
use portal allowing users to link to any or all of their supply-chain
information sources in a customizable interface and participate in product
content related processes via the Internet.
Agile eXpress Viewer allows supply chain partners to send and receive
information in the PDX format, a new standard for data exchange that we have
first offered with Agile Anywhere. Agile eXpress Viewer will be available for
downloading free of charge from the Agile web site, to enable supply chain
partners to share data even if they are not Agile customers.
Agile Integration Products
Product content information flows throughout the supply chain, and is
published to or from Agile Anywhere and a variety of other design,
manufacturing, finance and supply chain systems. Agile Anywhere integration
products, previously available with Agile Workplace, provide data exchange
between systems, as follows:
Agile ChangeCAST publishes released engineering change orders, approved
parts lists, approved manufacturers lists and bills of materials from Agile to
separate enterprise resource planning systems.
Agile Scan allows customers to scan drawings and documents into the Agile
eHub database.
Agile Import allows customers to import bills of materials produced in
ASCII format or in Microsoft Excel, providing a consolidated database of
product information.
Agile Export provides a quick and easy method of exporting information to
an ASCII file, allowing information in Agile Anywhere to be shared with other
business applications.
Agile Software Development Kit, newly available with Agile Anywhere, allows
customers and partners to develop complementary applications integrating Agile
Anywhere with design, manufacturing, customer service, supply chain or other
legacy systems. The Agile Software Development Kit allows users to write
applications in Java, Visual Basic and Visual C++.
Initial implementations of the Agile Anywhere suite typically include the
Agile eHub and one or more server modules such as what we now call the Product
Definition Server, Product Change Server and AML Server, together with user
licenses, and one or more of the integration products, in particular Agile
ChangeCAST, and often a third-party adapter for other existing enterprise
systems of the customer. Following the initial implementation, additional user
licenses and additional server modules may be purchased.
Customers
To date, we have licensed our products to over 350 customers, predominantly
within the electronics and medical device manufacturing industries. No
customer accounted for more than ten percent of our total revenues in fiscal
1997, fiscal 1998, fiscal 1999 or for the six months ended October 31, 1999.
44
<PAGE>
The following is a representative list of current customers in our targeted
industry markets that to date have purchased over $50,000 of Agile products
and services. These customers represented more than 26% of our total revenue
for fiscal 1999:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Datacom/Telecom Equipment Computers and Peripherals Medical Equipment
Alcatel Schweiz S3/Diamond Multimedia Systems EndoSonics
Aspect Telecommunications Fujitsu Computer Products GE Marquette Medical Systems
Brocade Communications Systems Gateway Guidant
Lucent Technologies Hitachi Hologic
Nortel Networks Iomega Humphrey Instruments
PairGain Packard Bell Visx
Xircom
Electronics Manufacturing Components Semiconductor Equipment
EFTC Advanced Micro Devices Credence Systems
Flextronics International Micron Technology Electro-Scientific Industries
Pemstar Reltec Communications FSI International
Solectron Texas Instruments Johnson Matthey Electronics
Xetel VLSI Technology Strasbaugh
Consumer Electronics
3Com Palm Computing
Dolby Laboratories
Philips Mobile Computing
Scientific Atlanta
WebTV Networks
</TABLE>
Product Technology and Architecture
The Agile Anywhere product suite is designed upon open systems based on
software industry standards for scalable Internet applications. The result is
a low cost, low maintenance end-user business application that eliminates the
need for complex custom or in-house development. Agile Anywhere is built on an
Internet-based architecture:
. The core of our architecture is the Agile eHub, the application server,
which currently runs on Microsoft NT. The application server is the
intermediary between the iCM and My Agile applications and the database,
providing the necessary security for validation of the data, and the web
server, which hosts the Internet access to Agile Anywhere. We use
encryption technology licensed from RSA Data Security to maintain secure
data when transported over the Internet.
. The applications are Java and HTML-based applications that can run on
versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator. There is
also a Windows application for users who prefer a Windows user interface
rather than a web browser interface. Operating systems supported include
Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT and Sun Solaris. We follow the
Microsoft standards for the Windows 95 and 98 CM clients, and Internet
standards for the Java iCM application running within Microsoft Internet
Explorer and Netscape Communicator. Our products can be integrated with
more than 15 enterprise resource planning systems including, among
others, Oracle, J.D. Edwards and SAP.
. The backend includes the database server, which is either Oracle or
Microsoft SQL Server, and the Agile Internet File Server. We connect with
Microsoft SQL Server through Open Database Connectivity, and Oracle's
database through direct integration.
45
<PAGE>
We are certified in Windows Back-Office, Oracle CAI, as a Microsoft
Solution Provider, and from Sun Microsystems Inc. in "100% Pure Java." The
Agile Anywhere suite is enabled for both single-byte and double-byte
localization, and has been localized for French. We intend to provide
localization for additional languages.
We have entered into platform alliances to ensure our products are based on
industry standards and to enable us to take advantage of current and emerging
technologies, including alliances with Sun Microsystems, Oracle and Microsoft.
To promote development, definition, adoption, promotion and implementation of
open standards that can be leveraged by Agile Anywhere, we work with several
industry standards organizations such as the National Institute of Standards
and Technology, National Electronics Manufacturing Initiative, Institute for
Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits, RosettaNet, and World Wide
Web Consortium. We are involved with Solectron, Marshall Industries, and other
industry participants in an initiative to define an XML-based protocol called
Product Definition eXchange.
Product Development
Our product development objectives are to:
. be innovative in developing solutions to remove complexity from supply
chain collaboration;
. develop products that require no custom code, contain reusable components
and are easy to use, implement, maintain, and upgrade; and
. adopt industry standard technologies.
Our software development staff is divided into teams consisting of
development engineers, project managers, quality assurance engineers, and
technical writers. Working closely with our marketing department, we determine
product functionality based upon market requirements, customer feedback,
available technical support and customer engineering in addition to emerging
technologies allowing us to develop additional features.
We introduced our first product, Agile Configurator version 1.3, in June,
1996 and have subsequently released nine revisions, adding over a dozen new
modules. During this time, the product has evolved from a 2-tiered client-
server database application running on Oracle to a multi-tiered application
supporting both Windows and Java clients, and both Oracle and Microsoft SQL
Server databases. Our product development activities are focused on broadening
the scalability and functionality of Agile Anywhere, enhancing scalability,
and including application interfaces that allow customers to more easily
integrate Agile Anywhere with other systems.
Our research and development expenses were $2.5 million for fiscal 1997,
$3.8 million for fiscal 1998, $4.7 million for fiscal 1999 and $3.2 million
for the six months ended October 31, 1999, and we expect to continue to invest
significantly in research and development in the future.
We cannot be sure that we will complete our existing and future development
efforts within our anticipated schedule or that our new and enhanced products
will have the features to make them successful. We may experience difficulties
that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or
marketing of new or enhanced products. In addition, these new and enhanced
products may not meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve market
acceptance. Furthermore, despite testing by us, our implementation partners
and our customers, errors might be found in new products or in releases after
shipment, resulting in loss of revenue or delay in market acceptance and
sales, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation or
increased service and warranty costs.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing organization is responsible for identifying and
developing vertical markets as well as identifying and notifying our research
and development staff of customer product requirements. We market and sell our
products primarily through our direct sales force located at our headquarters
in San Jose, California, and at regional and local sales offices in the United
States and at one office in France. Our direct sales force
46
<PAGE>
consists of Major Account Executives who focus entirely on our major accounts,
Senior Account Executives who focus on specific geographic territories, and
Emerging Technology Manufacturers Account Executives who focus on emerging and
smaller-sized companies. We also market and sell through our direct telesales
and telemarketing representatives. Sales engineers at most regional offices
provide pre-sales technical support. We intend to expand our domestic and
international direct sales force significantly by expanding into additional
geographic locations. We are also in the early stages of complementing our
direct sales force through additional distribution channels, including non-
exclusive distributors, integrators and consulting partners.
To support our direct sales efforts and to actively promote our Agile
brand, we engage in a variety of marketing activities. These include co-
marketing strategies with our existing business partners, targeting additional
strategic relationships, managing and maintaining our web site content,
advertising in industry and other publications, conducting public relations
campaigns and establishing and maintaining relationships with recognized
industry analysts. We also actively participant in manufacturing-related trade
shows.
A critical element of our sales strategy is to establish marketing
alliances to promote sales and marketing of our products, as well as to
increase product interoperability. We also pursue services alliances with
consulting and integration firms to implement our software, provide customer
support services, create customized customer presentations and demonstrations
and endorse our products during the evaluation stage of the sales cycle. We
believe that our relationships with these service providers may shorten our
sales cycle because these service providers have generated and qualified sales
leads, made initial customer contacts and assessed needs prior to our
introduction. We currently have relationships with Siemens and Origin
Technology in Business.
Customer Service and Support
Consulting and Implementation. We offer services, primarily on a fixed-
price basis, to assist in implementation planning, product installation,
implementation assistance, legacy data loading and effectiveness audits. To
facilitate and enhance the integration of our products, we have alliances for
integration of our products with existing design, manufacturing, finance and
supply chain systems. This approach allows us to focus on our core
competencies and leverage our partners' domain knowledge, which helps reduce
time to market both for us and our customers.
Customer Support. We believe that responsive technical support is a
requirement for our continued growth. We provide technical support and
unspecified product upgrades on a when-and-if available basis through our
annual maintenance program. Our customers are not entitled to new products
under our annual maintenance program. Customers generally purchase the first
year of support at the time they initially license a product. After the
initial term, support may be renewed on an annual or multi-year basis.
Customer support is offered by telephone, email, fax and Internet-based
support that features frequently asked questions, technical alerts, product
upgrades and updates, problem reporting and analysis, and self-help through
our on-line knowledge base. In addition, our consulting and implementation
partners provide customer support and maintenance in some instances. Revenues
associated with maintenance contracts are recognized ratably over the term of
the maintenance contract, which is generally 12 months.
Training. We offer a variety of classes and related materials to train our
customers on system administration, upgrades and new releases. These classes
are also available as part of our Train the Trainer program. Training classes
are offered at our headquarters in San Jose, California, at customer sites,
and at other locations. To improve access to our explanatory materials, we
offer on-line documentation contained on the compact discs for our products
and from our web site for all our products. We also offer on-line help for the
majority of our products. Customers can purchase additional documentation via
our web site.
Competition
The market for product content management software is new, highly
fragmented, rapidly changing and increasingly competitive. We expect
competition to persist and intensify, which could result in price reductions,
47
<PAGE>
reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any one of which could
seriously harm our business. Competitors vary in size and in the scope and
breadth of the products and services offered.
We believe that our ability to compete depends on many factors both within
and beyond our control, including:
. the performance, functionality, price, reliability and speed of
implementation of our solutions;
. the timing and market acceptance of new products and product enhancements
to our Agile Anywhere suite of products;
. the quality of our customer service; and
. the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts.
Although we believe that we currently compete favorably as to each of these
factors, our market is relatively new and our product content management
software is a new category of products. In particular, we believe that we
offer a suite of product content management software that offers collaborative
and interactive capabilities that many of our competitors do not effectively
provide. However, we encounter competition with respect to different aspects
of our solution from a variety of vendors. We currently face three primary
sources of competition:
. in-house development efforts by potential customers or partners;
. vendors of engineering information management software, such as
Parametric Technology Corporation, Dassault Systemes S.A., Structural
Dynamics Research Corporation and Unigraphics Solutions, Inc.; and
. developers of general purpose groupware software addressing only limited
technology components of engineering change management, including
companies such as Novell, Inc. and Lotus Development Corporation.
In addition, we face potential competition from providers of enterprise
software who seek to extend the functionality of their products, such as
Oracle Corporation, SAP A.G., i2 Technologies, Inc., Aspect Development, Inc.
and Baan Company N.V.
We may not be able to maintain our competitive position against current and
potential competition, particularly competitors that have longer operating
histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other
resources than we do and therefore may be able to respond more quickly to new
or changing opportunities, technologies and customer requirements. Also, many
current and potential competitors have greater name recognition and more
extensive customer bases that could be leveraged to gain market share to our
detriment. These competitors may be able to undertake more extensive
promotional activities, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, and offer more
attractive terms to purchasers than we can. In addition, current and potential
competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties to enhance their products. Accordingly it is
possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and
rapidly acquire significant market share. We also expect that competition may
increase as a result of industry consolidation. We may not be able to maintain
our competitive position against current and potential competitors, especially
those with significantly greater financial, marketing, service, support,
technical and other resources.
Proprietary Rights
Our success and ability to compete depend upon our proprietary technology.
We rely on patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark law to protect our
proprietary information. We also typically enter into agreements with our
employees, consultants and customers to control their access to and
distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information.
Nevertheless, a third party could copy or otherwise obtain our software or
other proprietary information without authorization, or could develop software
competitive to ours.
48
<PAGE>
Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate and our
competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our
products or design around patents that may be issued to us or our other
intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not
protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the
United States, and we expect that it will become more difficult to monitor the
use of our products if we increase our international presence.
We utilize database management software from Microsoft and Oracle for our
database servers. Our customers can purchase this software directly from
Microsoft and Oracle or from us. In addition, we integrate third-party
software into our products from RSA Data Security for security and encryption
technology, from Actuate for reporting capability and from Cimmetry Systems
for our viewers. This third-party software may not continue to be available on
commercially reasonable terms. If we cannot maintain licenses to this third-
party software at an acceptable cost, shipments of our products could be
delayed until equivalent software could be developed or licensed and
integrated into our products. We do not believe that our business could be
considered to be substantially dependent on any one of these license
agreements, and none of these licenses are responsible for a significant
amount of our revenues.
There has been a substantial amount of litigation in the software and
Internet industries regarding intellectual property rights. It is possible
that, in the future, third parties may claim that we or our current or
potential future products infringe their intellectual property. We expect that
software product developers and providers of electronic commerce solutions
will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products
and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of
products in industry segments overlaps. Any claims, with or without merit,
could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment
delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. If our
products were found to infringe a third party's proprietary rights, we could
be required to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to continue
to be able to sell our products. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required,
may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which could
seriously harm our business.
Employees
As of October 31, 1999, we had a total of 188 employees. Of this total, 42
were in engineering, 76 were in sales and marketing, 43 were in professional
services, including technical support and customer training, and 27 were in
finance and administration. In addition, as of October 31, 1999, Digital
Market had 49 employees, of which 23 were in engineering, 19 were in sales and
marketing, 5 were in professional services and 2 were in finance and
administration. We also retain independent contractors to support activities
such as our professional services and product development. Our success depends
on our ability to attract and retain qualified, experienced employees. None of
our employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit, and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We consider our relations with our
employees to be good.
Facilities
Our headquarters are currently located in a leased facility in San Jose,
California, consisting of approximately 43,000 square feet under a lease
expiring in 2002 with expansion and renewal options, of which approximately
12,000 square feet is currently sublet to other tenants on short-term
subleases. We have recently entered into a lease agreement expiring in 2005
for an additional approximately 34,000 square feet in a building adjoining our
San Jose facility, beginning in March 2000. We also lease offices for sales
and service personnel in eight locations in the United States as well as in
Paris, France. We believe our current facilities will be adequate to meet our
needs for the foreseeable future.
Legal Proceedings
We are currently involved in litigation with Facilities Management
International, a Southern California based systems integration company that
filed a complaint against us in the Superior Court for the State of
California, County of Orange, on February 19, 1999. The complaint alleges our
interference with prospective
49
<PAGE>
economic advantage and unfair business practices in connection with our quote
for services to one of our customers. We have responded by filing an answer
that denies all allegations. Although the lawsuit seeks unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages as well as injunctive relief, we have
reached a preliminary agreement to settle the lawsuit for the sum of $21,500.
If we do not finalize this settlement, we intend to continue to defend
ourselves vigorously, and after consideration of the nature of the claims do
not believe that resolution of this matter will harm our business. However,
due to the inherently uncertain nature of litigation and the fact that
discovery has yet to take place, we cannot determine the possible loss, if
any, that we may ultimately incur either in the context of a trial or as a
result of a negotiated settlement. Our defense of this litigation, regardless
of its outcome, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources.
Digital Market is a party to two related lawsuits in federal court with
PolyDyne Development Corporation:
PolyDyne originally filed a Bill of Discovery on October 2, 1998, and filed
a formal complaint on July 13, 1999, in the District Court of Travis County,
Texas, which was removed to the United States District Court for the Western
District of Texas on August 13, 1999. In its complaint, PolyDyne has alleged
that Digital Market introduced its Digital Buyer software, a product that it
alleges competes with PolyDyne's QuoteWin and SupplyWin software, under
circumstances that it claims constituted trade secrets misappropriation, theft
of trade secrets and conversion. Digital Market has responded by denying all
allegations, and intends to defend itself vigorously.
Related to this lawsuit, Digital Market filed suit on July 26, 1999 in the
Federal District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that
PolyDyne made false, misleading and deceptive statements about Digital Market,
involving accusations that Digital Market infringed PolyDyne's copyrights and
trade secrets, resulting in commercial disparagement, trade libel, defamation
and interference with Digital Market's prospective business relations. Digital
Market seeks damages and declaratory relief. PolyDyne has answered the
pleadings and brought counterclaims alleging theft of trade secrets,
conversion and common law misappropriation.
After consideration of the nature of the claims, we do not believe that
resolution of these related matters will harm our business. However, due to
the inherently uncertain nature of litigation, we cannot determine the
possible loss, if any, that we may ultimately incur either in the context of a
trial or as a result of a negotiated settlement. Our defense of this
litigation, regardless of its outcome, could result in the expenditure of
significant financial and managerial resources.
50
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
Our executive officers and directors and their ages as of October 31, 1999
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Position
- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Bryan D. Stolle......... 41 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Thomas P. Shanahan...... 53 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
D. Kenneth Coulter...... 54 Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations
Scott R. Hammond........ 37 Vice President, e-Procurement and e-Services
Gregory G. Schott....... 35 Vice President, Business Development
Carol B. Schrader....... 43 Vice President, Marketing
Dorothy O. Wise......... 38 Vice President, Development and Support
Klaus-Dieter Laidig..... 57 Director
Michael Moritz.......... 44 Director
James L. Patterson...... 61 Director
Nancy J. Schoendorf..... 44 Director
</TABLE>
Bryan D. Stolle is a co-founder of Agile and has served as our President
and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since our
inception in March 1995. From 1987 to 1994, Mr. Stolle served as Director of
Product and Strategic Marketing at Sherpa Corporation, a developer of
enterprise product data management software. From 1983 to 1987, Mr. Stolle
served as Marketing Officer at Rexcom Systems, a software company co-founded
by Mr. Stolle. Mr. Stolle received a B.A. in Business Administration and an
M.B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.
Thomas P. Shanahan is a co-founder of Agile and has been a member of our
board of directors since our inception in March 1995. Since November 1997, Mr.
Shanahan has served as Agile's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Shanahan served as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Digital Generation Systems, Inc., a provider of digital
distribution systems to the broadcast advertising industry. From 1993 to 1994,
Mr. Shanahan served as Chief Financial Officer of Sherpa Corporation. Mr.
Shanahan received a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University and an M.B.A.
from Harvard University.
D. Kenneth Coulter has served as Agile's Senior Vice President of Worldwide
Field Operations since August 1999. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Coulter served as
President, and as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales, at TriStrata, Inc.,
a provider of network security software. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Coulter served
as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales, at Memco Software, a provider of
network security software. From 1988 to 1997, Mr. Coulter served in various
positions culminating in Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations, at
Informix Software, a provider of database software.
Scott R. Hammond has served as Agile's Vice President of e-Procurement and
e-Services since November, 1999, when Agile acquired Digital Market. From 1995
to 1999, Mr. Hammond was founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Digital Market. Prior to that date, Mr. Hammond was co-founder and Director of
Sales for EcoSystems Software, a provider of integrated systems management
software tools. Mr. Hammond received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the
University of Rochester and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of Business.
Gregory G. Schott has served as Agile's Vice President of Business
Development since June 1999. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Schott served as Vice
President of Marketing at Digital Generation Systems, Inc., a provider of
digital distribution systems to the broadcast advertising industry. From 1996
to 1997, Mr. Schott served as Vice President of Operations, from 1995 to 1996
as Director of Business Development and from 1994 to 1995 as Director of
Operations, all at Digital Generation Systems. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Schott
served as a management consultant at The Boston Consulting Group. Mr. Schott
received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University
and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.
51
<PAGE>
Carol B. Schrader has served as Agile's Vice President of Marketing since
October 1997. In 1997, Ms. Schrader served as an independent consultant with
Killarney Group. From 1995 to 1997, Ms. Schrader served as Director, Industry
Development at Documentum, Inc., a provider of web content management
solutions. From 1990 to 1995, Ms. Schrader served as Director, Market
Development at Sherpa Corporation. Ms. Schrader received a B.A. in Business
Management from Clarke College.
Dorothy O. Wise has served as Agile's Vice President of Development and
Support since March 1996. From 1994 to 1996, Ms. Wise served as Vice
President, Quattro Pro Business Unit, at Novell, Inc., a provider of network
services operating system software. Ms. Wise received a B.S.E. in Electrical
Engineering and Computer Science from Princeton University.
Klaus-Dieter Laidig has served as a director of Agile since 1998. Mr.
Laidig has served as a management consultant with Laidig Business Consulting
GmbH since 1998. From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Laidig served as General Manager of
Hewlett-Packard GmbH. Mr. Laidig currently serves as a director of SAP AG,
Henninger Braeu AG and several privately held companies. Mr. Laidig received
an M.B.A. from the Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences in Germany.
Michael Moritz has served as a director of Agile since 1996. Mr. Moritz has
been a general partner of Sequoia Capital, a venture capital firm, since 1986.
Mr. Moritz serves as a director of eToys, Inc., Flextronics International
Ltd., Yahoo! Inc., WebVan Group, Inc. and several additional private
companies. Mr. Moritz received an M.A. from Christ Church, Oxford.
James L. Patterson has served as a director of Agile since 1996. Mr.
Patterson has been an independent consultant since 1989. Mr. Patterson
currently serves as a director of Latitude Communications, Inc., a provider of
integrated voice and data conferencing solutions, and several privately held
companies. Mr. Patterson received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the
University of Colorado.
Nancy J. Schoendorf has served as a director of Agile since 1995. Ms.
Schoendorf has been a general partner of Mohr, Davidow Ventures, a venture
capital firm, since 1994, and a Managing Partner since 1997. Prior to joining
Mohr, Davidow Ventures, Ms. Schoendorf spent 17 years in the computer industry
including management positions with Hewlett-Packard, Software Publishing
Corporation and Sun Microsystems. Ms. Schoendorf currently serves as a
director of Actuate Software Corp., a provider of enterprise reporting
software solutions and several privately held companies. Ms. Schoendorf
received a B.S. in Computer Science from Iowa State University and an M.B.A.
from Santa Clara University.
Board of Directors
The terms of the board of directors are divided into three classes:
Class I, whose term will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be
held in 2000; Class II, whose term will expire at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2001; and Class III, whose term will expire at the
annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2002. The Class I directors are
Mr. Moritz and Mr. Laidig, the Class II directors are Ms. Schoendorf and Mr.
Patterson, and the Class III directors are Mr. Stolle and Mr. Shanahan. At
each annual meeting of stockholders after the initial classification, the
successors to directors whose term expires will be elected to serve a term of
three years. This classification of directors may have the effect of delaying
or preventing changes in our control.
Board Committees
Audit Committee. The board of directors has established an audit committee
consisting of Mr. Laidig and Mr. Moritz. The audit committee reviews with our
independent accountants the scope and timing of their audit services and any
other services that they are asked to perform, the independent accountants'
report on our consolidated financial statements following completion of their
audit, and our policies and procedures with respect to internal accounting and
financial controls. In addition, the audit committee makes annual
recommendations to our board of directors for the appointment of independent
accountants for the ensuing year.
52
<PAGE>
Compensation Committee. The board of directors has established a
compensation committee consisting of Mr. Patterson and Ms. Schoendorf. The
compensation committee makes recommendations to the board concerning salaries
and incentive compensation for our officers and employees and administers our
employee benefit plans.
Director Compensation
Our directors do not receive any cash compensation for their services as
directors but are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses in attending
meetings of the board of directors. Our directors are eligible to participate
in our 1995 Stock Option Plan and employee-directors are able to participate
in our 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Mr. Laidig received an option to
purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.65 per share
when he joined the board of directors in November, 1998.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No interlocking relationship exists between any member of our board of
directors or our compensation committee and any member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any other company, and no such
relationship has existed in the past. Prior to the creation of our
compensation committee in May 1999, all compensation decisions were made by
our full board. Neither Mr. Stolle nor Mr. Shanahan participated in
discussions by our board with respect to his compensation.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change of Control
Arrangements
None of our executive officers is employed under an employment agreement
with significant contractual severance provisions. However, if any of our
executives is terminated without cause during the eighteen months following a
change of control, then vesting of all options to purchase our common stock
held by these employees will accelerate.
Executive Compensation
The following table presents information for the fiscal years ended April
30, 1997, 1998 and 1999 regarding the compensation paid to our chief executive
officer and each of our other highest-paid executive officers whose total
salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999:
Summary Compensation Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards
--------------------- ---------------
Securities
Underlying All Other
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Options/SARs(#) Compensation
- --------------------------- ---- -------- ------- --------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Bryan D. Stolle............. 1999 $159,997 $50,000 125,000 $4,000
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer 1998 150,000 20,000 56,750 2,025
1997 109,992 -- -- 1,083
Thomas P. Shanahan.......... 1999 146,664 29,735 25,000 --
Chief Financial Officer(1) 1998 52,494 17,500 30,000 --
1997 -- -- 145,000 --
Carol B. Schrader........... 1999 114,000 19,000 32,000 --
Vice President,
Marketing(2) 1998 55,250 -- 53,000 --
1997 -- -- -- --
Dorothy O. Wise............. 1999 138,000 41,669 25,000 --
Vice President, Development
and Support 1998 138,403 26,000 35,000 --
1997 138,000 24,000 -- --
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Mr. Shanahan joined Agile in November 1997.
(2) Ms. Schrader joined Agile in October 1997.
53
<PAGE>
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following table designates each grant of stock options during the
fiscal year ended April 30, 1999 to our chief executive officer and each of
our other highest-paid executive officers. All of these options were granted
under our 1995 Stock Option Plan. Each of these options has been exercised,
but the shares purchased under these options are subject to repurchase by us
at the original exercise price paid per share upon the optionee's cessation of
service with us prior to vesting of the shares. Our repurchase right lapses
and the optionee vests in 20% of his or her option shares upon completion of
12 months of service from the vesting start date and vests in the balance in a
series of equal monthly installments over the next four years of service.
Vesting of the option shares will fully accelerate upon a change in our
control and involuntary termination of the employee's services during the
subsequent 18 months.
The percentages in the column entitled "Percent of Total Options Granted to
Employees in Fiscal 1999" are based on an aggregate of 978,275 options granted
to our employees under our 1995 Stock Option Plan during the fiscal year ended
April 30, 1999. The exercise price of each option is equal to the fair market
value of our common stock as determined by the board of directors on the date
of grant, taking into account the purchase price paid by investors for shares
of our preferred stock, the liquidation preferences and other rights,
privileges and preferences associated with the preferred stock and an
evaluation by the board of directors of our revenues, operating history and
prospects.
The potential realizable value is calculated based on the ten-year term of
the option at the time of grant. For purposes of these columns, we assumed
stock price appreciation of 5% and 10% as required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. These rates of appreciation do not represent our
prediction of our stock price performance. The potential realizable values at
5% and 10% appreciation are calculated by assuming that the estimated fair
market value on the date of grant, based upon the initial public offering
price of $21.00 per share, appreciates at the indicated rate for the entire
term of the options and that the option is exercised at the exercise price and
sold on the last day of its term at the appreciated price.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants
--------------------------------------------- Potential Realizable Value
Number of Percent of at Assumed Annual Rates of
Securities Total Options Stock Price Appreciation
Underlying Granted to Exercise for Option Term
Options Employees in Price Expiration -------------------------
Name Granted Fiscal 1999 ($/Share) Date 5% 10%
---- ---------- ------------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Bryan D. Stolle......... 33,333 3.4% $3.00 3/26/09 $1,040,216 $1,715,603
91,667 9.4 3.00 3/26/09 2,860,633 4,717,971
Thomas P. Shanahan...... 25,000 2.6 2.50 8/25/08 792,670 1,299,215
Carol B. Schrader....... 22,000 2.3 2.35 7/8/08 700,849 1,146,609
10,000 1.0 2.65 11/17/08 315,568 518,186
Dorothy O. Wise......... 25,000 2.6 2.65 11/17/08 788,920 1,295,465
</TABLE>
54
<PAGE>
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values
The following table presents for our chief executive officer and each of
our other highest-paid executive officers the number of options exercised
during the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999 and the number and value of
securities underlying unexercised options that are held by our chief executive
officer and each of our other highest-paid executive officers as of April 30,
1999. Each of the options listed in the table is immediately exercisable. The
shares purchased under the options may be repurchased by us at the original
exercise price paid per share if the optionee ceases service with us before
vesting in the shares. The heading "Vested" refers to shares no longer subject
to repurchase; the heading "Unvested" refers to shares subject to repurchase
as of April 30, 1999. The numbers in the column entitled "Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options at April 30, 1999" are based on the initial public
offering price of $21.00 per share and net of the exercise price payable for
these shares.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Securities Value of
Underlying Unexercised
Unexercised In-The-Money
Shares Options at Options at
Acquired on April 30, 1999 April 30, 1999 ($)
Exercise Value --------------- ---------------------
Name (#) Realized ($) Vested Unvested Vested Unvested
---- ----------- ------------ ------ -------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Bryan D. Stolle......... -- $ -- -- 175,000 -- $3,227,500
Thomas P. Shanahan...... -- -- -- 25,000 -- 462,500
Carol B. Schrader....... 22,000 51,700 -- 10,000 -- 183,500
Dorothy O. Wise......... -- -- -- 25,000 -- 458,750
</TABLE>
Stock Plans
1995 Stock Option Plan. Our 1995 stock option plan was approved by our
board of directors in May 1995 and by our stockholders in January 1996. The
plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, to employees, and for grants of
nonstatutory stock options and stock issuances to employees, including
officers, non-employee directors and consultants.
The plan is currently administered by the compensation committee. Subject
to the provisions of the plan, the board or its committee has the authority to
select the persons to whom options or stock issuances are granted and
determine the terms of each option or stock issuance, including:
. the number of shares of common stock covered by the option or stock
issuance;
. when the option becomes exercisable or when the stock issuance vests;
. the per share option exercise price, which in the case of incentive stock
options must be at least equal to the fair market value of a share of
common stock on the grant date or 110% of such fair market value for
incentive stock options granted to 10% stockholders, and, in the case of
nonstatutory stock options, must be at least 85% of the fair market value
of a share of common stock on the grant date; and
. the duration of the option, which for incentive stock options may not
exceed ten years, or, with respect to incentive stock options granted to
10% stockholders, five years.
Generally, options granted under the plan are immediately exercisable.
Options and stock issuances granted under the plan generally vest over five
years, although the board or its committee may specify a different vesting
schedule for a particular grant. Options granted under the plan are non-
transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution;
provided, however that the board or its committee may provide that
nonstatutory stock options are transferable for estate planning purposes,
subject to applicable law. Unvested shares issued pursuant to a stock issuance
are generally non-transferrable.
55
<PAGE>
In the event of a change in control of Agile, the acquiring or successor
corporation may either assume the outstanding options granted under the plan
or replace the options with a cash incentive program that is paid out in
accordance with the original vesting schedule and that preserves the spread on
the unvested shares subject to the options. If the options or stock issuances
are not assumed or replaced by the acquiring or successor corporation, then
the shares subject to each option outstanding under the plan at the time of
the change in control shall automatically vest in full, and then expire.
Currently, the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan is
5,375,000. The share reserve will automatically be increased on the first day
of each fiscal year beginning on and after May 1, 2000 by the lesser of
500,000 shares per year, 5% of the number of shares of our common stock that
was issued and outstanding on the last day of the preceding fiscal year, or a
lesser number of shares determined by the board of directors. As of October
31, 1999, options to purchase a total of 1,834,525 shares at a weighted
average exercise price of $8.25 per share were outstanding and 1,125,419
shares were available for future option grants.
Digital Market Options. In connection with our acquisition of Digital
Market, we assumed the outstanding options that were granted under the Digital
Market 1995 Stock Plan. The assumed options were converted into options to
purchase 10,758 shares of our common stock. As of November 24, 1999, all of
the assumed options remained outstanding. Generally, the assumed Digital
Market options become exercisable as the underlying shares vest, and options
generally vest over four years. No additional options will be granted under
the Digital Market plan.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The board of directors adopted our 1999
employee stock purchase plan in June 1999, which was approved by the
stockholders in August 1999. We have reserved a total of 500,000 shares of
common stock for issuance under the 1999 employee stock purchase plan, none of
which have been issued as of the effective date of this offering. The share
reserve will automatically be increased on May 1, 2000 and on each May 1
thereafter until and including May 1, 2009, by an amount equal to the lesser
of 500,000 shares per year, 2% of our outstanding common stock on the last day
of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or such lesser number of shares as
determined by the board of directors.
The employee stock purchase plan is intended to qualify under Section 423
of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan will be administered by our
compensation committee. Employees, including officers and employee directors,
of Agile or any subsidiary designated by the board for participation in the
plan, are eligible to participate in the plan if they are customarily employed
for more than 20 hours per week and more than five months per year. Eligible
employees may begin participating at the start of any offering period.
The first offering period will run for approximately 24 months and will be
divided into four consecutive purchase periods of approximately six months.
The first offering period and the first purchase period commenced on August
19, 1999 and will terminate on the last day of August, 2001. Subsequent
offering periods will generally have a duration of approximately 6 months.
Offering periods after the initial offering period will commence on the first
day of March and September of each year. The board may change the dates or
duration of one or more offering periods, but no offering may exceed 27
months.
The employee stock purchase plan permits eligible employees to purchase
common stock through payroll deductions at a price no less than 85% of the
lower of the fair market value of the common stock on (a) the first day of the
offering, or (b) the purchase date. Participants generally may not purchase
more than 1,000 shares in a six-month offering period or stock having a value
greater than $25,000 in any calendar year as measured at the beginning of the
offering period. In the event of a change in control of Agile, the board may
accelerate the purchase date of the then current offering period to a date
prior to the change in control, unless the acquiring or successor corporation
assumes or replaces the purchase rights outstanding under the employee stock
purchase plan. Our board of directors may amend or terminate the 1999 employee
stock purchase plan at any time.
56
<PAGE>
401(k) Plan
Agile provides a tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan,
commonly known as a 401(k) plan, which covers its eligible employees. Under
the 401(k) plan, employees may elect to reduce their current annual
compensation up to the lesser of 20% or the statutorily prescribed annual
limit, which is $10,000 in calendar year 1999, and have the amount of the
reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan does not currently
permit additional matching contributions to the 401(k) plan by Agile on behalf
of the participants in the 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify
under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, so that
contributions by Agile or its employees to the 401(k) plan, and income earned
on such contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the
401(k) plan, and so that contributions by Agile, if any, will be deductible by
Agile when made. The trustee of the 401(k) plan invests the assets of the
401(k) plan in the various investment options as directed by the participants.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, we have adopted
provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that limit or
eliminate the personal liability of our directors for a breach of their
fiduciary duty of care as a director. The duty of care generally requires
that, when acting on behalf of the corporation, directors exercise an informed
business judgment based on all material information reasonably available to
them. Consequently, a director will not be personally liable to us or our
stockholders for monetary damages or breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
except for liability for:
. any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;
. acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
. unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions
or other distributions; or
. any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
Our certificate of incorporation allows us to indemnify our officers,
directors and other agents to the full extent permitted by Delaware law. We
have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
officers that are, in some cases, broader than the specific indemnification
provisions permitted by Delaware law, and that may provide additional
procedural protection. The indemnification agreements require us, among other
things, to:
. indemnify officers and directors against certain liabilities that may
arise because of their status as officers or directors;
. advance expenses, as incurred, to officers and directors in connection
with a legal proceeding, subject to limited exceptions; or
. obtain directors' and officers' insurance.
Our bylaws also permit us to purchase insurance on behalf of any officer,
director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her
actions in such capacity, regardless of whether Delaware law would permit
indemnification, and to provide indemnification in circumstances in which
indemnification is otherwise discretionary under Delaware law. We have
purchased a policy of directors' and officers' liability insurance that
insures our directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or
payment of a judgment in some circumstances.
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of
our directors, officers or employees in which indemnification is sought, nor
are we aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for
indemnification.
57
<PAGE>
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Since May 1, 1996 there has been no transaction or series of transactions
to which we were a party involving $60,000 or more and in which any director,
executive officer or holder of more than 5% of our capital stock had a
material interest other than the transactions described below.
Sales of Preferred Stock to Insiders
Since inception in March 1995, we have issued shares of preferred stock, in
private placement transactions to the following persons who are executive
officers, directors or principal stockholders of Agile:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Series A Series B Series C Series D Series E Series F
Preferred Preferred Preferred Preferred Preferred Preferred
Investor Stock Stock Stock Stock Stock Stock
- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Entities affiliated with
Sequoia Capital........ 150,000 -- 2,275,000 322,000 334,672 148,148
Entities affiliated with
Mohr, Davidow
Ventures............... 30,000 2,825,000 1,225,000 448,000 565,424 74,074
Entities affiliated with
James L. Patterson..... -- -- 75,000 -- 14,011 14,816
Affiliates of Bryan D.
Stolle................. 185,000 -- -- -- -- --
Thomas P. Shanahan...... 85,000 -- -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
The preferred stock purchased by these directors and affiliates was
purchased on the same terms and conditions as the preferred stock purchased by
other investors. The preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the
rate of one share of common stock for each share of preferred stock.
In April, 1995, we issued a total of 1,150,000 shares of Series A preferred
stock and in May 1995 we issued 82,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a
purchase price of $.10 per share. The purchasers of the Series A Preferred
Stock originally included various private individuals including Thomas P.
Shanahan, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Agile, and relatives of
Bryan Stolle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Agile. Subsequently,
entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital and Mohr, Davidow Ventures purchased
the shares of Series A preferred stock reflected in the table above from some
of these private individuals.
In June 1995, we issued a total of 2,937,995 shares of Series B preferred
stock at a purchase price of $.354 per share. In January 1996, we issued
3,500,000 shares of Series C preferred stock and in October 1996 we issued
75,000 shares of Series C preferred stock at a purchase price of $1.16 per
share. In February 1997, we issued 1,350,000 shares of Series D preferred
stock at a purchase price of $2.964 per share. In November 1997, we issued
1,000,000 shares of Series E preferred stock at a purchase price of $5.00 per
share. In June 1998, we issued 1,777,778 shares of Series F preferred stock at
a purchase price of $6.75 per share.
The entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital are together considered a
greater than 5% stockholder of Agile. Mr. Michael Moritz, a director of Agile,
is a general partner of Sequoia Capital. Entities affiliated with Mohr,
Davidow are together considered a greater than 5% stockholder of Agile. Ms.
Nancy Schoendorf, a director of Agile, is a general partner of Mohr, Davidow.
Mr. James Patterson is a director of Agile, Mr. Bryan Stolle is Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Agile, and Mr. Thomas Shanahan is Chief Financial
Officer and a director of Agile.
All of our shares of preferred stock converted to common stock upon the
occurrence of our initial public offering in August 1999.
Loans to Executive Officers and Directors
On November 17, 1997, we loaned $31,800 to Carol B. Schrader, our Vice
President, Marketing, in connection with the purchase of 53,000 shares of our
common stock for $.60 per share upon exercise of stock options. The note
accrues interest at the rate of 6.14% per year and is due on November 17,
2001. This note was repaid on November 15, 1999. On August 4, 1998, we loaned
$51,700 to Ms. Schrader, in connection with the purchase of 22,000 shares of
our common stock for $2.35 per share upon exercise of stock options. This note
58
<PAGE>
accrues interest at the rate of 5.68% per year, and is due on August 4, 2003.
On November 17, 1997, we loaned $5,475 to Eric Schrader, an affiliate of Carol
Schrader, in connection with the purchase of 9,125 shares of our common stock
for $.60 per share upon exercise of stock options. The note accrues interest
at the rate of 6.14% per year and is due on November 17, 2001. The principal
amounts of each of these notes remain outstanding. Each of these loans are
full recourse and secured by a pledge of the stock purchased upon exercise of
the stock option.
On November 12, 1999, we made an unsecured loan in the amount of $25,000 to
Ms. Schrader. The loan accrues interest at the rate of 6.00% per year and is
due on the earlier to occur of the termination of Ms. Schrader's employment
with Agile, sale by Ms. Schrader of any Agile common stock, or at the rate of
$250.00 per semi-monthly pay period beginning July 1, 2000. The loan to Ms.
Schrader was not made in connection with the exercise of stock options.
On June 1, 1999, we loaned $132,500 to Klaus-Dieter Laidig, one of our
directors, in connection with the purchase of 50,000 shares of our common
stock for $2.65 per share upon exercise of stock options. The note accrues
interest at the rate of 4.84% per year, and is due on June 1, 2004. The
principal amount of the note remains outstanding. This loan is full recourse
and is secured by a pledge of the stock purchased upon exercise of the stock
option.
All loan amounts outstanding as of October 31, 1999 are reflected as a
reduction of equity in the consolidated balance sheet.
Indemnification
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors
and officers. These indemnification agreements will require us to indemnify
our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
See "Management--Limitation of Liability and Indemnification" on page 57 for
additional information regarding these indemnification agreements and
provisions in our charter documents requiring us to indemnify our officers and
directors.
Conflict of Interest Policy
We believe that all transactions with our directors, officers and principal
stockholders described above were made on terms no less favorable to us than
could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties. A majority of the
disinterested outside directors on our board of directors approves all
transactions between Agile and our officers, directors, principal stockholders
and their affiliates. Any similar transactions will continue to be on terms no
less favorable to us than we could have obtained from unaffiliated third
parties.
59
<PAGE>
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock
as of October 31, 1999 and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares of
common stock offered hereby by:
. the chief executive officer, each of the executive officers named in the
summary compensation table and each of our directors;
. all executive officers and directors as a group;
. each person or entity who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5%
of our outstanding common stock; and
. each selling stockholder.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of the named individuals
is c/o Agile Software Corporation, One Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, California
95113. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community
property laws, we believe that the persons named in the table have sole voting
and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them.
Applicable percentage ownership in the table is based on 21,367,200 shares
of common stock outstanding as of October 31, 1999, assuming the issuance of
611,765 shares of common stock in connection with our acquisition of Digital
Market and the exercise of warrants to purchase 57,190 shares of our common
stock, and 22,617,200 shares outstanding immediately following the completion
of this offering, assuming the underwriters' over-allotment option is not
exercised. Of the total shares outstanding, 1,058,654 shares are subject to
our right of repurchase. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Shares of common
stock subject to options or warrants that are presently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 1999 are deemed outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person or entity holding
options or warrants, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity. Entries
denoted by an asterisk represent an amount less than 1%.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares
Shares Beneficially Owned
Beneficially Owned After
Prior to Offering Offering
------------------ Shares ------------------
Name and Address of Beneficial Being
Owner Number Percent Offered Number Percent
- ------------------------------ ---------- ------- ------- ---------- -------
Executive Officers and
Directors:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Bryan D. Stolle(1).............. 999,750 4.6% 70,000 929,750 4.1%
Thomas P. Shanahan(2)........... 435,000 2.0 40,000 395,000 1.7
Scott R. Hammond................ 90,004 * 9,169 80,835 *
Carol B. Schrader(3)............ 205,000 * 20,000 185,000 *
Dorothy O. Wise(4).............. 243,000 1.1 15,000 228,000 1.0
James L. Patterson(5)........... 122,627 * -- 122,627 *
Nancy J. Schoendorf(6).......... 5,280,493 24.7 39,210 5,241,283 23.2
c/o Mohr, Davidow Ventures
2775 Sand Hill Road
Building 1, Suite 240
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Michael Moritz(7)............... 3,229,820 15.1 -- 3,229,820 14.3
c/o Sequoia Capital
3000 Sand Hill Road
Building 4, Suite 280
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Klaus-Dieter Laidig(8).......... 50,000 * -- 50,000 *
All executive officers and
directors
as a group (11 persons)(9).... 10,781,887 48.6 193,379 10,588,508 45.2
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Shares
Beneficially Beneficially
Owned Prior to Owned After
Offering Offering
----------------- Shares -----------------
Name and Address of Beneficial Being
Owner Number Percent Offered Number Percent
- ------------------------------ --------- ------- ------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Principal Stockholders:
Entities affiliated with Mohr
Davidow Ventures(10)........... 5,280,493 24.7% 39,210 5,241,283 23.2%
2775 Sand Hill Road
Building 1, Suite 240
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Entities affiliated with Sequoia
Capital(11).................... 3,229,820 15.1 -- 3,229,820 14.3
3000 Sand Hill Road
Building 4, Suite 280
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Entities affiliated with
Integral Capital(12)........... 593,000 2.8 -- 593,000 2.6
2750 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Entities affiliated with Accel
Partners(13)................... 1,028,115 4.8 -- 1,028,115 4.5
428 University Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Dell U.S.A., L.P., a Texas
Limited Partnership............ 256,016 1.2 -- 256,016 1.1
One Dell Way
Round Rock, TX
Flextronics International,
Ltd............................ 256,016 1.2 -- 256,016 1.1
2090 Fortune Way
San Jose, CA 95131
Avnet, Inc/Marshall Industries.. 153,609 * -- 153,609 *
9320 Telstar Avenue
El Monte, CA 91731
Other Selling Stockholders:
Entities affiliated with Charter
Growth Capital(14)............. 296,000 1.4 45,000 251,000 1.1
525 University Avenue, Suite
1500
Palo Alto, CA 94301
George A. Needham(15)........... 258,000 1.2 45,000 213,000 *
c/o Needham Capital Partners
445 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Comdisco, Inc.(16).............. 158,301 * 92,190 66,111 *
6111 North River Road
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
Carlos L. Camacho (17).......... 365,000 1.7 36,000 329,000 1.5
Joseph J. Fazio (18)............ 357,500 1.7 36,000 321,500 1.4
Matthias F. Moran............... 337,916 1.6 75,000 262,916 1.2
90 Parkridge Drive #7
San Francisco, CA 94131
Stanford A. Smith............... 150,000 * 25,000 125,000 *
67 Lowell Road
Wellesley, MA 02481
Wiley L. Carter................. 110,000 * 30,000 80,000 *
164 E. Dana Street
Mountain View, CA 94041-2229
Cheryl A. Breetwor.............. 100,000 * 55,000 45,000 *
12681 Mira Loma Way
Los Altos, CA 94024
C. Duane Wilson................. 90,000 * 10,000 80,000 *
7746 Deer Trail Place
Dallas, TX 75238
Carl D. Wilson.................. 85,250 * 12,500 73,750 *
3410 Augusta
Rockwall, TX 75087
Alvar J. Green.................. 80,000 * 25,000 55,000 *
2661 Kekaa Drive
Lahaina, HI 96761
James Lawson.................... 50,853 * 25,000 25,853 *
102 Lake Cliffe Court
Cary, NC 27513
Edward M. Leonard............... 50,000 * 23,500 26,500 *
950 Tower Lane, 18th Floor
Foster City, CA 94404-2130
</TABLE>
61
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Shares
Beneficially Beneficially
Owned Prior to Owned After
Offering Offering
---------------- Shares -----------------
Name and Address of Being
Beneficial Owner Number Percent Offered Number Percent
- ------------------- -------- ------- ------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Vanda Stolle............. 75,000 * 21,000 54,000 *
7518 Del Monte
Houston, TX 77063
Stuart P. Silverman(19).. 45,000 * 22,500 22,500 *
870 Boyce Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Carlos R. Camacho........ 25,000 * 10,000 15,000 *
10425 SW 112 Av Apt 208
Miami, FL 33176
Elena Moran.............. 25,000 * 10,000 15,000 *
4 Canterbury Hill
Tyler Hill
Canterbury, Kent CT29LS
UK
Andrew Leonard........... 1,500 * 1,500 -- --
750 Saginaw Dr.
Redwood City, CA 94063
Cynthia Leonard.......... 1,500 * 1,500 -- --
1005 Sansome St., Suite
242
San Francisco, CA 94111
Vaughn R. Bennion........ 2,704 * 1,097 1,607 *
5239 Vista Grande Ave.
Santa Rosa, CA 94503
Steven E. Bochner........ 332 * 153 179 *
499 W. Portola Ave.
Los Altos, CA 94022
Che Family Trust......... 6,602 * 2,747 3,855 *
Her-daw Che, Trustee
19976 Price Ave.
Cupertino, CA 95104
Chiang-Fa and Chi-Wei
Hwang................... 11,870 * 5,310 6,560 *
7667 Berland Court
Cupertino, CA 95104
Wongfratis Investment
Company,................ 50,934 * 2,000 48,934 *
a California General
Partnership
51 Jordan Place
Palo Alto, CA 94304
WS Investment Company
95B..................... 1,794 * 829 965 *
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Altos Ventures I, L.P.... 58,195 * 26,493 31,702 *
2882 Sand Hill Road,
Ste. 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Victoria Ann Bennion..... 121 * 56 65 *
1672 Greenwich St.
San Francisco, CA 94123
Caran Establishment...... 13,337 * 4,631 8,706 *
Ancar Company
244 California Street,
Ste. 310
San Francisco, CA 94111
Marshall G. Cox.......... 1,645 * 454 1,191 *
15720 Glen Una Drive
Los Altos, CA 95030
Robert A. Fildes ........ 2,773 * 900 1,873 *
905 Pepperwood Drive
Danville, CA 94506
Andrew Hwang............. 604 * 279 325 *
7667 Berland Ct.
Cupertino, CA 95014
Ironwood Capital, LLP.... 1,645 * 454 1,191 *
2241 Lundy Ave.
San Jose, CA 95131
</TABLE>
62
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Shares
Beneficially Beneficially
Owned Prior to Owned After
Offering Shares Offering
-------------- Being --------------
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number Percent Offered Number Percent
- ------------------------------------ ------ ------- ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Jerry P. Machle......................... 1,458 * 552 906 *
2295 Mimosa Court
Los Altos, CA 94024
Roy S. Mollard.......................... 822 * 227 595 *
13977 Albar Court
Saratoga, CA 95070
Sointu Limited.......................... 821 * 226 595 *
465 Loom Court
Bodega Bay, CA 94923
Robert G. Todd.......................... 3,649 * 454 3,195 *
10350 West Loyola Drive
Los Altos, CA 94024
Trinity V Side-by-Side Fund, L.P........ 2,473 * 1,144 1,329 *
3000 Sand Hill Road
Building 1, Ste. 240
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Trinity Ventures V, L.P................. 43,025 * 19,577 23,448 *
3000 Sand Hill Road
Building 1, Ste. 240
Menlo Park, CA 94025
United Overseas Bank Venture............ 20,533 * 9,496 11,037 *
Investments II, Ltd.
80 Raffles Place
10th Storey
UOB Plaza 1
048624 Singapore
United Overseas Bank Venture............ 43,246 * 20,000 23,246 *
Investments, Ltd.
80 Raffles Place
10th Storey
UOB Plaza 1
048624 Singapore
United Overseas Bank Venture............ 4,438 * 1,557 2,881 *
Management Pte., Ltd.
80 Raffles Place
10th Storey
UOB Plaza 1
048624 Singapore
Zhi Yi.................................. 415 * 115 300 *
214 Greenoaks Drive
Atherton, CA 94027
The Zelencick 1996 Trust................ 1,232 * 340 892 *
155 Crest Road
Woodside, CA 94062
Highland Capital Partners III LP........ 43,938 * 20,011 23,927 *
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110-4104
Highland Entrepreneurs' Fund III LP..... 1,830 * 833 997 *
Two International Place
Boston, Ma 02110-4104
Menlo Ventures VII, L.P................. 96,116 * 53,319 42,797 *
3000 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Menlo Entrepreneurs Fund VII, L.P....... 4,036 * 1,838 2,198 *
3000 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Red Rock Ventures, L.P.................. 610 * 277 330 *
10350 West Loyola Drive
Los Altos, CA 94024
Ernst & Young Foundation................ 49,104 * 27,515 21,589 *
125 Chubb Avenue
Lindhurst, NJ 07071
</TABLE>
63
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Shares
Beneficially Beneficially
Owned Prior to Owned After
Offering Offering
--------------- Shares -----------------
Name and Address of Beneficial Being
Owner Number Percent Offered Number Percent
- ------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Saint Francis High School.......... 751 * 347 404 *
1885 Miramonte Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94040-4098
Imperial Bank...................... 3,677 * 1,700 1,977 *
2460 Sand Hill Road, Ste. 102
Menlo Park, CA 94025
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes 18,750 shares held by Bryan D. Stolle as Custodian for Jacob N.
Stolle under UCAUTMA, 18,750 shares held by Bryan D. Stolle as Custodian
for Wilson E. Stolle under UCAUTMA, 100,000 shares held by the Deborah S.
Stolle Annuity Trust dated 8/18/99, 100,000 shares held by the Bryan D.
Stolle Annuity Trust dated 8/18/99, 1,000 shares held by Bryan D. Stolle
as Custodian for Caroline Stolle under UCAUTMA, 1,000 shares held by
Bryan D. Stolle as Custodian for Michael Pettit under UCAUTMA, and 1,000
shares held by Bryan D. Stolle as Custodian for Jonathan Parlicek under
UCAUTMA. Also includes 175,000 shares subject to options that are
immediately exercisable.
(2) Includes 59,167 shares subject to a right of repurchase in favor of Agile
which lapses over time. Also includes 15,000 shares held by Robert M.
Smelick as Custodian for Thomas A. Shanahan, 15,000 shares held by Robert
M. Smelick as Custodian for Kelly J. Shanahan, 15,000 shares held by
Robert M. Smelick as Custodian for Patrick L. Shanahan, 5,000 shares held
by the Thomas Alan Shanahan Trust, 5,000 shares held by the Kelly Jean
Shanahan Trust, and 5,000 shares held by the Patrick Lee Shanahan Trust,
and 325,000 shares held by Thomas P. Shanahan and Robyn Lynn Shanahan,
Trustees of the Shanahan Family Trust u/d/t dated April 15, 1997. Also
includes 50,000 shares subject to options that are immediately
exercisable.
(3) Includes 53,000 shares subject to a right of repurchase in favor of Agile
which lapses over time. Also includes 74,725 shares subject to options
that are immediately exercisable and 45,275 shares held by Eric Schrader.
(4) Includes 49,000 shares subject to a right of repurchase in favor of Agile
which lapses over time. Also includes 40,000 shares subject to options
that are immediately exercisable.
(5) Includes 73,011 shares held directly by James L. Patterson, 34,800 shares
held by The Patterson Grandchildren's Trust, of which James L. Patterson
is trustee, and 14,816 shares held by The Patterson Family Trust, of
which James L. Patterson is trustee.
(6) Ms. Schoendorf is a general partner of Mohr, Davidow Ventures, and is a
director of Agile. Represents 216,284 shares held by MDV IV Entrepreneurs
Network Fund, L.P., and 5,064,209 shares held by Mohr, Davidow Ventures
IV, L.P. Ms. Schoendorf disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by
these entities, except to the extent of her proportional pecuniary
interest arising from her partnership interest in Mohr, Davidow Ventures.
(7) Mr. Moritz is a general partner of the general partners of the entities
affiliated with Sequoia Capital and is a director of Agile. Represents
109,880 shares held by Sequoia 1995, 2,080 shares held by Sequoia 1997,
318,074 shares held by Sequoia Capital Growth Fund, 2,631,214 shares held
by Sequoia Capital VI, 20,302 shares held by Sequoia Technology Partners
III, 144,572 shares held by Sequoia Technology Partners VI, and 3,698
shares held by SQP 1997. SC VIII Management, LLC exercises investment and
voting power over the shares held by Sequoia 1997. Mr. Moritz disclaims
beneficial ownership of shares held by these entities, except to the
extent of his proportional pecuniary interest arising from his
partnership interest in the general partner of the general partners of
the entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital. Mr. Moritz does not hold
sole voting or investment power in any of these entities.
(8) Represents shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable.
(9) Shares listed as held by all directors and executive officers as a group
include 802,000 shares subject to options that are immediately
exercisable.
(10) Represents 216,284 shares held by MDV IV Entrepreneurs Network Fund,
L.P., and 5,064,209 shares held by Mohr, Davidow Ventures IV, L.P. Ms.
Schoendorf, a director of Agile, is a general partner of Mohr, Davidow
Ventures. The 50,000 shares are being sold by Mohr Davidow Ventures IV,
L.P.
(11) Represents 109,880 shares held by Sequoia 1995, 2,080 shares held by
Sequoia 1997, 318,074 shares held by Sequoia Capital Growth Fund,
2,631,214 shares held by Sequoia Capital VI, 20,302 shares held by
Sequoia Technology Partners III, 144,572 shares held by Sequoia
Technology Partners VI, and 3,698 shares held by SQP 1997. SC VIII
Management, LLC exercises investment and voting power over the shares
held by Sequoia 1997. Mr. Moritz, a director of Agile, is a general
partner of the general partners of the entities affiliated with Sequoia
Capital.
(12) Represents 589,689 shares held by Integral Capital Partners IV, L.P. and
2,904 shares held by Integral Partners IV MS Side Fund L.P.
64
<PAGE>
(13) Represents 828,661 shares held by Accel V L.P., 111,036 shares held by
Accel Internet/Strategic Technology Fund L.P., 49,350 shares held by
Accel Investors '96 L.P., 16,450 shares held by Accel Keiretsu V L.P. and
22,618 shares held by Ellmore C. Patterson Partners.
(14) Represents 237,037 shares held by Charter Growth Capital, L.P., 44,444
shares held by Charter Growth Capital Co-Investment Fund L.P. and 14,815
shares held by CGC Investors L.P. Of the 45,000 shares sold, 36,000 are
being sold by Charter Growth Capital, L.P., 6,750 shares are being sold
by Charter Growth Captal Co-Investment Fund L.P. and 2,250 shares are
being sold by CGC Investors L.P.
(15) Represents 116,895 shares held by Needham Capital Partners II, L.P.,
16,438 shares held by Needham Capital Partners II (Bermuda), L.P. and
125,000 shares held by George A. Needham. Mr. Needham is a general
partner of each of Needham Capital Partners II, L.P. and Needham Capital
Partners II (Bermuda), L.P. Mr. Needham disclaims beneficial ownership of
shares held by Needham Capital Partners II, L.P. and Needham Capital
Partners II (Bermuda), L.P. except to the extent of his proportional
pecuniary interest in these partnerships. Of the 45,000 shares sold,
17,500 shares are being sold by Needham Capital Partners II, L.P., 2,500
shares are being sold by Needham Capital Partners (Bermuda), L.P. and
25,000 shares are being sold by George A. Needham.
(16) Includes 41,111 shares issuable upon exercise of an outstanding warrant,
and 57,190 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants in November 1999.
(17) Includes 2,084 shares subject to a right of repurchase in favor of Agile
that lapses over time.
(18) Includes 326,500 shares held by Joseph J. Fazio, 15,500 shares held by
Joseph J. Fazio as Custodian for James J. Fazio under UCAUTMA, and 15,500
shares held by James J. Fazio as Custodian for Therese Victoria Fazio
under UCAUTMA. Also includes 12,084 shares subject to a right of
repurchase in favor of Agile that lapses over time.
(19) Represents shares held by Stuart P. Silverman and Terry K. Silverman,
Trustee under the Stuart P. Silverman and Terry K. Silverman Family Trust
dated 9/17/85. Includes 5,625 shares subject to a right of repurchase in
favor of Agile that lapses over time.
65
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock
and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock.
The following is a summary of our capital stock. Our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and the provisions of applicable law provide further
information about our capital stock.
Common Stock
As of October 31, 1999, there were 20,698,245 shares of common stock
outstanding. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any preferred
stock outstanding at the time, the holders of outstanding shares of common
stock are entitled to the following rights:
. to receive dividends out of assets legally available therefor at such
times and in such amounts as the board from time to time may determine in
its sole discretion;
. one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders; and
. upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of Agile, to share ratably in
all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation of
any preferred stock.
Cumulative voting for the election of directors is not authorized by our
certificate of incorporation, which means that the holders of a majority of
the shares voted can elect all of the directors then standing for election.
The common stock is not entitled to preemptive rights and is not subject to
conversion or redemption. Each outstanding share of common stock is, and all
shares of common stock to be outstanding upon completion of this offering will
be, upon payment, duly and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. The
rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of common stock are subject
to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any shares
of preferred stock which we may issue in the future.
Preferred Stock
Under our certificate of incorporation, the board of directors is
authorized, without further action by the stockholders, to designate and issue
up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series. The board of
directors can fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each
series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions on these shares.
The board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power or
other rights of the holders of common stock. The issuance of preferred stock,
while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other
corporate purposes could, under certain circumstances, have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Agile. We have no
current plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.
Warrants
In September 1995, Agile issued a warrant to Comdisco, Inc. to purchase an
aggregate of 41,111 shares of Series B preferred stock at an exercise price of
$.354 per share. The warrant may be exercised at any time within seven years
after issuance.
In March 1996, Agile issued a warrant to Comdisco, Inc. to purchase an
aggregate of 35,313 shares of Series C preferred stock at an exercise price of
$1.16 per share. The warrant may be exercised at any time within seven years
after issuance. Comdisco has indicated that it intends to exercise this
warrant and sell the shares of common stock issuable upon its exercise in this
public offering.
In February 1997, Agile issued a warrant to Comdisco, Inc. to purchase an
aggregate of 17,828 shares of Series D preferred stock at an exercise price of
$2.964 per share. The warrant may be exercised at any time within seven years
after issuance. Comdisco has indicated that it intends to exercise this
warrant and sell the shares of common stock issuable upon its exercise in this
public offering.
66
<PAGE>
In November 1997, Agile issued a warrant to Comdisco, Inc. to purchase an
aggregate of 4,049 shares of Series D preferred stock at an exercise price of
$2.964 per share. The warrant may be exercised at any time within seven years
after issuance. Comdisco has indicated that it intends to exercise this
warrant and sell the shares of common stock issuable on its exercise in this
public offering.
Registration Rights of Some of Our Stockholders
Following this offering, the holders of approximately 11,252,758 shares of
common stock and 41,111 shares of stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant
will have rights to register those shares under the Securities Act and an
amended and restated rights agreement. Subject to certain limitations in the
registration rights agreement, the holders of at least 30% of these shares, or
a lesser percent if the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of
underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $10,000,000, may require,
on two occasions, that Agile use its best efforts to register those shares for
public resale. If Agile registers any of its common stock for its own account
or for the account of other security holders, the holders of those shares are
entitled to include their shares of common stock in the registration, subject
to the ability of the underwriters to limit the number of shares included in
the offering. Any holder or holders of those shares may also require Agile to
register all or a portion of their registrable securities in a registration
statement on Form S-3 when Agile is eligible to use that form, provided, among
other limitations, that the proposed aggregate price to the public is at least
$500,000 and that Agile has not effected two of these registrations in any 12-
month period. Agile will pay all fees, costs and expenses of these
registrations, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. These rights
terminate on the earlier of August 24, 2002, and the date when all shares of a
holder can be sold by the holder under Rule 144 of the Securities Act during
any 90 day period.
All of the registration rights described above are subject to conditions
and limitations, among them the right of the underwriters in any underwritten
offering to limit the number of shares of common stock to be included in a
registration. Registrations of any shares of common stock held by holders with
registration rights would result in these shares being freely tradeable
without restriction under the Securities Act upon the effective date of the
registration.
Antitakeover Effects of Delaware Law and Provisions of Our Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws
Delaware Takeover Statute
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This
provision generally prohibits any Delaware corporation from engaging in any
business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three
years following the date the stockholder became an interested stockholder,
unless:
. prior to that date the board of directors approved either the business
combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming
an interested stockholder;
. upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at
least 85% of the voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction
began; or
. on or following that date, the business combination is approved by the
board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the
outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.
Section 203 defines a business combination to include:
. any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested
stockholder;
. any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of the
assets of the corporation involving the interested stockholder;
. subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in the
issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation
to the interested stockholder;
67
<PAGE>
. any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of
increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class or series of
the corporation beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or
. the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans,
advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or
through the corporation.
In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as any entity or
person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or
controlled by such entity or person.
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our certificate of incorporation provides that all stockholder actions must
be effected at a duly called meeting and not by a consent in writing. The
bylaws provide that, except as otherwise required by law or by our certificate
of incorporation, special meetings of the stockholders can only be called by a
resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors, or by the
president or at the request of stockholders holding at least 10% of our
capital stock. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that
our board of directors will be divided into three classes, with each class
serving staggered three-year terms. The classification system of electing
directors may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or
otherwise attempting to obtain control of us and may maintain the incumbency
of our board of directors, as the classification of the board of directors
generally increases the difficulty of replacing a majority of the directors.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock,
which makes it possible for the board of directors to issue preferred stock
with voting or other rights or preferences that could discourage potential
acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in our control or
management. The amendment of any of these provisions would require approval by
holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding common stock.
These provisions are designed to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited
acquisition proposal, and to enhance the likelihood of continuity and
stability in the composition of our board of directors. These provisions are
also designed to discourage tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However,
these provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making
tender offers for our shares and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit
fluctuations in the market price of our shares that could result from rumored
or actual takeover attempts.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for Agile's common stock is Boston
EquiServe. Its address is 150 Royall Street, Canton Massachusetts 02021 and
its telephone number at this location is (781) 575-3400.
68
<PAGE>
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market, or the possibility of these sales, could cause the trading price of
our common stock to decline.
Upon completion of this offering, we will have outstanding 22,617,200
shares of common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters' over-
allotment option, no exercise of outstanding options to purchase common stock
after October 31, 1999, the issuance of 611,765 shares to the shareholders of
Digital Market and the exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase 57,190
shares of our common stock in November 1999. Of these shares, all of the
2,250,000 shares sold in this offering and the 3,450,000 shares sold in our
initial public offering in August 1999 will be freely tradeable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except for any
shares purchased by our "affiliates," as defined in Rule 144 under the
Securities Act, which would be subject to the limitations and restrictions
described below. In addition, 150,000 shares were released from lock-up
agreements in November 1999 and will be freely tradable subject to Rule 144 or
701.
The remaining shares of common stock held by existing stockholders are
"restricted securities" as defined in Rule 144, other than the shares issued
to the former holders of Digital Market's capital stock and warrants, which
are freely tradable as a result of Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act.
These securities may be sold in the public market only if registered or if
they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 under
the Securities Act, which are summarized below. Of these shares, 2,741,441
shares, including 397,663 of the shares of our common stock issued to the
shareholders of Digital Market, will be subject to "lock-up" agreements on the
effective date of the offering expiring on February 16, 2000, and 14,173,907
shares will be subject to "lock-up" agreements expiring 91 days after the date
of this offering. Sales of these restricted securities in the public market,
or the availability of these shares for sale, could cause the trading price of
our common stock to decline.
The amounts of restricted securities that will be available for sale in the
public market, subject in some cases to the volume limitations and other
restrictions of Rule 144, will be as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Days after Date of Approximate Shares
this Prospectus Eligible for Future Sale Comment
---------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------
<C> <C> <S>
Currently.................................. 3,600,000 Freely tradable shares
sold in our initial
public offering, plus
150,000 shares no longer
subject to lock-up
agreements and salable
under Rule 144 or 701
On effectiveness........................... 2,250,000 Shares sold in this
offering
February 16, 2000.......................... 2,593,293 Initial public offering
lock-up expires; shares
salable under Rule 144
or 701, or Section
3(a)(10)
91 days after the date of this prospectus.. 14,173,907 90 day lock-up expires;
shares salable under
Rule 144 or 701
</TABLE>
Shares issued upon exercise of options granted by us prior to the date of
this prospectus will be available for sale in the public market under Rule 701
of the Securities Act. Rule 701 permits resales of these shares in reliance
upon Rule 144 but without compliance with various restrictions, including the
holding period requirement, imposed under Rule 144. In general, under Rule
144, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a person (or persons
whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted securities
for at least one year would be entitled to sell within any three-month period
a number of shares not to exceed the greater of (1) one percent of the then
outstanding shares of common stock or (2) the average weekly trading volume of
our common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a Form
144 with respect to the sale. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner
of sale and notice requirements, as well as to the availability of current
public information about us. Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to
have been an affiliate at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who
has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years
is entitled to sell the shares without complying with the manner of sale,
public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.
69
<PAGE>
We have reserved an aggregate of 5,375,000 shares of common stock for
issuance pursuant to our 1995 Stock Option Plan. As of October 31, 1999,
options to purchase an aggregate of 1,834,525 shares of common stock were
outstanding and 1,125,419 shares remained available for grant under our 1995
Stock Option Plan. We intend to file registration statements on Form S-8 under
the Securities Act after completion of this offering to register all of the
shares of common stock issued or reserved for issuance under our 1995 Stock
Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Digital Market's 1995
Stock Plan. Shares of common stock issued under these plans, after the filing
of related registration statements, will be freely tradable in the public
market, subject to the Rule 144 limitations applicable to our affiliates,
lock-up agreements with the underwriters and vesting restrictions imposed by
us.
In connection with our initial public offering on August 19, 1999, our
officers, directors, the selling stockholders and other principal stockholders
agreed, and the shareholders of Digital Market agreed as part of our
acquisition of Digital Market, with Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated not to
sell or otherwise dispose of any of their shares for a period expiring on
February 16, 2000. In addition, the officers, directors, selling stockholders
and principal stockholders of Agile have agreed not to sell or otherwise
dispose of an aggregate of 14,173,907 shares until 91 days after the date of
this offering. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, however, may in its sole
discretion, at any time without notice, release all or any portion of the
shares subject to either of these lock-up agreements.
70
<PAGE>
UNDERWRITERS
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in the underwriting
agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the underwriters named below, for
whom Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and
Hambrecht & Quist LLC are acting as representatives, have severally agreed to
purchase, and we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to them,
severally, the respective number of shares of common stock set forth opposite
the names of the underwriters below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Name Shares
---- ---------
<S> <C>
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated...............................
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ..................................
Hambrecht & Quist LLC...........................................
---------
Total......................................................... 2,250,000
=========
</TABLE>
The underwriters are offering the shares subject to their acceptance of the
shares from us and the selling stockholders and subject to prior sale. The
underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several
underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of common stock
offered hereby are subject to the approval of certain legal matters by their
counsel and to certain other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to
take and pay for all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus,
other than those covered by the over-allotment option described below, if any
such shares are taken.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of common
stock directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus and part to certain dealers at a price that
represents a concession not in excess of $ a share under the public
offering price. Any underwriter may allow, and the dealers may reallow, a
concession not in excess of $ a share to other underwriters or to certain
other dealers. After the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the
offering price and other selling terms may from time to time be varied by the
representatives of the underwriters.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from
the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to an aggregate of 337,500
additional shares of common stock at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and
commissions. The underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose
of covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this offering of
the shares of common stock. To the extent this option is exercised, each
underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase
approximately the same percentage of additional shares of common stock as the
number set forth next to each underwriters name in the preceding table bears
to the total number of shares of common stock set forth next to the names of
all underwriters in the preceding table.
Each of Agile, our officers, directors, the selling stockholders and other
principal stockholders has agreed that, without the prior written consent of
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, or otherwise
during the period ending 90 days after the date of this prospectus, it will
not:
. offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to
purchase, purchase any contract to sell, grant any option, right or
warrant to purchase, lend, or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into
or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or
. enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in
whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the
common stock,
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of common
stock or such other securities, in cash or by alternative payment.
71
<PAGE>
The restrictions described in the previous paragraph do not apply to:
. the sale of shares to the underwriters;
. the issuance by Agile of shares of common stock upon the exercise of an
option or a warrant or the conversion of a security outstanding on the
date of this prospectus which is described in the prospectus;
. transactions by any person other than Agile relating to shares of common
stock or other securities acquired in open market transactions after the
completion of the offering of the shares; or
. the grant of options to purchase shares of common stock pursuant to our
existing employee benefit plans.
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to
discretionary accounts to exceed five percent of the total number of shares of
common stock offered by them.
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"AGIL."
In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the underwriters
may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
price of the common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may over-allot in
connection with the offering, creating a short position in the common stock
for their own account. In addition, to cover over-allotments or to stabilize
the price of the common stock, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase,
shares of common stock in the open market. Finally, the underwriting syndicate
may reclaim selling concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for
distributing the common stock in the offering if the syndicate repurchases
previously distributed shares of common stock in transactions to cover
syndicate short positions, in stabilization transactions or otherwise. Any of
these activities may stabilize or maintain the market price of the common
stock above independent market levels. The underwriters are not required to
engage in these activities and may end any of these activities at any time.
The underwriting agreement provides that Agile and the selling stockholders
will indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
On June 4, 1998, we sold shares of our Series F Preferred Stock in a
private placement. In this private placement, entities associated with
Hambrecht & Quist LLC, one of the underwriters in this offering, purchased
148,148 shares of Series F Preferred Stock, which are convertible into 148,148
shares of common stock, for an aggregate of $999,999, or $6.75 per share.
These entities purchased these shares on the same terms as the other investors
in the private placement. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. and Hambrecht & Quist LLC served as co-managing underwriters
of our initial public offering in August 1999, and received customary
underwriting discounts and commissions in connection therewith.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed
upon for Agile by Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, Palo Alto, California.
Certain legal matters in connection with the offering will be passed upon for
the underwriters by Fenwick & West LLP, Palo Alto, California.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Agile Software Corporation as of
April 30, 1998 and 1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended
April 30, 1999 included in this Prospectus have been so included in reliance
on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The financial statements of Digital Market, Inc. as of March 31, 1998 and
1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1999
included in this Prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of
KPMG LLP, independent certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
72
<PAGE>
WHERE TO FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT AGILE
Agile has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the
Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration
statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the
registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed with it. For
further information with respect to Agile and the common stock, reference is
made to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed with
it. With respect to statements contained in this prospectus regarding the
contents of any agreement or any other document, in each instance, reference
is made to the copy of such agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to
the registration statement. Each statement is qualified in all respects by the
exhibits and schedules.
For further information with respect to Agile and the common stock,
reference is made to the registration statement and its exhibits and
schedules. You may read and copy any document Agile files at the SEC's public
reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois.
Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public
reference rooms. Agile's SEC filings are also available to the public from the
SEC's web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Agile is subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of
the Exchange Act, and files periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. These periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information are available for inspection and copying at the SEC's public
reference rooms and the SEC's web site, which is described above.
73
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Agile Software Corporation
Report of Independent Accountants.......................................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheet................................................. F-3
Consolidated Statement of Operations....................................... F-4
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity............................. F-5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows....................................... F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................. F-8
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information
Overview................................................................... F-24
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet................................. F-25
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations....................... F-26
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information................ F-28
Digital Market, Inc.
Independent Auditors' Report............................................... F-29
Balance Sheet.............................................................. F-30
Statement of Operations.................................................... F-31
Statement of Shareholders' (Deficit) Equity................................ F-32
Statement of Cash Flows.................................................... F-33
Notes to Financial Statements.............................................. F-34
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Agile Software Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related
consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders' equity and of cash
flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Agile Software Corporation and its subsidiary (the "Company") at April 30,
1998 and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 1999 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
May 28, 1999, except for Note 8,
which is as of August 16, 1999
F-2
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of April 30, As of
------------------ October 31,
1998 1999 1999
-------- -------- -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................... $ 2,160 $ 10,003 $ 81,174
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $379, $495 and $565
(unaudited), respectively................... 3,384 4,980 4,467
Other current assets......................... 98 624 2,451
-------- -------- --------
Total current assets........................... 5,642 15,607 88,092
Property and equipment, net.................... 1,694 1,973 3,164
Other assets................................... 195 368 209
-------- -------- --------
$ 7,531 $ 17,948 $ 91,465
======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Bank line of credit borrowings............... $ 1,000 $ -- $ --
Accounts payable............................. 698 1,287 603
Accrued expenses and other liabilities....... 1,227 3,618 4,815
Deferred revenue............................. 3,146 5,107 5,655
Current portion of capital lease
obligations................................. 501 735 809
Current portion of notes payable............. -- 686 --
-------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities...................... 6,572 11,433 11,882
Capital lease obligations, noncurrent.......... 743 871 819
Notes payable, noncurrent...................... 39 2,353 39
-------- -------- --------
7,354 14,657 12,740
-------- -------- --------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' equity:
Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value;
31,176 shares authorized; 10,096, 11,874 and
no (unaudited) shares issued and
outstanding................................. 10 12 --
Common Stock, $.001 par value; 100,000 shares
authorized; 3,998, 4,200 and 20,698
(unaudited) shares issued and outstanding... 4 4 21
Additional paid-in capital................... 17,868 35,503 134,488
Notes receivable from stockholders........... (363) (748) (1,826)
Unearned stock compensation (Notes 6 and 9).. (2,237) (4,947) (19,066)
Accumulated deficit.......................... (15,105) (26,533) (34,892)
-------- -------- --------
Total stockholders' equity..................... 177 3,291 78,725
-------- -------- --------
$ 7,531 $ 17,948 $ 91,465
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Fiscal Year Ended April 30, October 31,
----------------------------- ------------------
1997 1998 1999 1998 1999
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
License................... $ 1,143 $ 6,102 $ 10,859 $ 4,756 $ 8,339
Professional services..... 187 1,385 3,665 1,471 2,165
Maintenance............... 22 516 2,283 826 2,321
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Total revenues.......... 1,352 8,003 16,807 7,053 12,825
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Cost of revenues:
License................... 113 543 819 406 528
Professional services..... 88 1,347 3,823 1,546 1,726
Maintenance............... 65 278 1,343 543 924
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Total cost of revenues.. 266 2,168 5,985 2,495 3,178
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Gross profit................ 1,086 5,835 10,822 4,558 9,647
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing....... 2,149 8,070 13,495 5,990 10,013
Research and development.. 2,510 3,788 4,742 2,216 3,194
General and
administrative........... 1,333 1,995 1,938 870 1,505
Amortization of stock
compensation (Notes 6
and 9)................... -- 856 2,253 945 3,658
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Total operating
expenses............... 5,992 14,709 22,428 10,021 18,370
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Loss from operations........ (4,906) (8,874) (11,606) (5,463) (8,723)
Interest and other income... 134 95 447 243 933
Interest expense............ (64) (163) (269) (93) (569)
-------- -------- --------- -------- --------
Net loss.................... $ (4,836) $ (8,942) $ (11,428) $ (5,313) $ (8,359)
======== ======== ========= ======== ========
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted......... $ (3.72) $ (4.20) $ (3.87) $ (1.89) $ (.90)
======== ======== ========= ======== ========
Weighted average shares... 1,300 2,129 2,952 2,814 9,264
======== ======== ========= ======== ========
Unaudited pro forma net loss
per share:
Basic and diluted......... $ (.78) $ (.50)
========= ========
Weighted average shares... 14,668 16,852
========= ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Convertible
Preferred Notes
Stock Common Stock Additional Receivable Unearned
------------- -------------- Paid-In From Stock Accumulated
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Stockholders Compensation Deficit Total
------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at April 30,
1996................... 7,671 $ 8 2,215 $ 2 $5,214 $ (40) $ -- $ (1,327) $ 3,857
Issuance of Common Stock
for cash............... -- -- 52 -- 3 -- -- -- 3
Issuance of Common Stock
on exercise of
options................ -- -- 564 1 64 -- -- -- 65
Issuance of Common Stock
in exchange for
services............... -- -- 12 -- 2 -- -- -- 2
Issuance of Series C
Convertible Preferred
Stock at $1.16 per
share, net of issuance
costs.................. 75 -- -- -- 83 -- -- -- 83
Issuance of Series D
Convertible Preferred
Stock at $2.964 per
share, net of issuance
costs.................. 1,350 1 -- -- 3,979 -- -- -- 3,980
Net loss................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (4,836) (4,836)
------ --- ----- --- ------ ----- ------ -------- --------
Balance at April 30,
1997................... 9,096 9 2,843 3 9,345 (40) -- (6,163) 3,154
Repurchase of unvested
Common Stock........... -- -- (48) -- (18) 15 -- -- (3)
Issuance of Common Stock
on exercise of
options................ -- -- 255 -- 71 -- -- -- 71
Issuance of Common Stock
in exchange for notes
receivable on exercise
of options............. -- -- 772 1 293 (294) -- -- --
Issuance of restricted
Common Stock in
exchange for notes
receivable............. -- -- 176 -- 106 (106) -- -- --
Repayment of notes
receivable............. -- -- -- -- -- 62 -- -- 62
Issuance of Series E
Convertible Preferred
Stock at $5.00 per
share, net of issuance
costs.................. 1,000 1 -- -- 4,978 -- -- -- 4,979
Unearned stock
compensation (Note 6).. -- -- -- -- 3,093 -- (3,093) -- --
Amortization of unearned
compensation (Note 6).. -- -- -- -- -- -- 856 -- 856
Net loss................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (8,942) (8,942)
------ --- ----- --- ------ ----- ------ -------- --------
Balance at April 30,
1998................... 10,096 10 3,998 4 17,868 (363) (2,237) (15,105) 177
Repurchase of unvested
Common Stock........... -- -- (120) -- (38) 32 -- -- (6)
Issuance of Common Stock
on exercise of
options................ -- -- 56 -- 28 -- -- -- 28
Issuance of Common Stock
in exchange for notes
receivable on exercise
of options............. -- -- 259 -- 419 (419) -- -- --
Issuance of restricted
Common Stock in
exchange for notes
receivable............. -- -- 7 -- 19 (19) -- -- --
Repayment of notes
receivable............. -- -- -- -- -- 21 -- -- 21
Issuance of Series F
Convertible Preferred
Stock at $6.75 per
share, net of issuance
costs.................. 1,778 2 -- -- 11,970 -- -- -- 11,972
Issuance of warrants.... -- -- -- -- 274 -- -- -- 274
Unearned stock
compensation (Note 6).. -- -- -- -- 4,963 -- (4,963) -- --
Amortization of unearned
compensation (Note 6).. -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,253 -- 2,253
Net loss................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (11,428) (11,428)
------ --- ----- --- ------ ----- ------ -------- --------
Balance at April 30,
1999................... 11,874 12 4,200 4 35,503 (748) (4,947) (26,533) 3,291
</TABLE>
F-5
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Convertible
Preferred Notes
Stock Common Stock Additional Receivable Unearned
--------------- -------------- Paid-In From Stock Accumulated
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Stockholders Compensation Deficit Total
------- ------ ------ ------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Repurchase of Common
Stock (unaudited)...... -- -- (14) -- (3) -- -- -- (3)
Issuance of Common Stock
in exchange for notes
receivable on exercise
of options
(unaudited)............ -- -- 107 -- 1,196 (1,196) -- -- --
Issuance of Common Stock
(unaudited)............ (11,874) (12) 15,989 16 79,445 -- -- -- 79,449
Issuance of Common Stock
on exercise of options
(unaudited)............ -- -- 356 1 165 -- -- -- 166
Repayment of notes
receivable
(unaudited)............ -- -- -- -- -- 118 -- -- 118
Issuance of Common Stock
upon exercise of
warrants (unaudited)... -- -- 60 -- 405 -- -- -- 405
Unearned stock
Compensation
(unaudited)............ -- -- -- -- 17,777 -- (17,777) -- --
Amortization of unearned
compensation
(unaudited)............ -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,658 -- 3,658
Net loss (unaudited).... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (8,359) (8,359)
------- --- ------ --- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
Balance at October 31,
1999 (unaudited)....... -- $-- 20,698 $21 $134,488 $(1,826) $(19,066) $(34,892) $78,725
======= === ====== === ======== ======= ======== ======== =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended April Six Months
30, Ended October 31,
-------------------------- ------------------
1997 1998 1999 1998 1999
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating ac-
tivities:
Net loss..................... $(4,836) $(8,942) $(11,428) $ (5,313) $ (8,359)
Adjustments to reconcile net
loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Provision for doubtful
accounts................... 100 277 155 83 70
Depreciation................ 220 673 1,180 483 743
Amortization of stock
compensation (Note 6)...... -- 856 2,253 945 3,658
Warrant expense............. -- -- 21 -- 253
Changes in assets and
liabilities:
Accounts receivable....... (838) (2,900) (1,751) (936) 443
Other assets, current and
non-current.............. (90) (89) (446) (63) (1,921)
Accounts payable.......... 370 313 589 (337) (684)
Accrued expenses and
other liabilities........ 270 912 2,391 977 1,197
Deferred revenue.......... 607 2,485 1,961 908 548
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash used in
operating activities... (4,197) (6,415) (5,075) (3,253) (4,052)
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing ac-
tivities:
Purchase of short-term
investments................. (387) -- -- -- --
Proceeds from sale of short-
term investments............ -- 3,023 -- -- --
Acquisition of property and
equipment................... (341) (420) (459) (297) (1,518)
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities............. (728) 2,603 (459) (297) (1,518)
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing ac-
tivities:
Proceeds from bank line of
credit...................... -- 2,230 1,900 900 --
Repayment of bank line of
credit...................... -- (1,230) (2,900) (1,900) --
Repayment of capital lease
obligations................. (145) (382) (638) (276) (394)
Proceeds from notes payable.. 39 -- 3,000 -- --
Repayment of notes payable... (24) (24) -- -- (3,000)
Proceeds from issuance of
Common Stock, net of
repurchase.................. 68 68 22 14 80,017
Repayment of notes receivable
from stockholders........... -- 62 21 10 118
Proceeds from issuance of
Convertible Preferred Stock,
net......................... 4,063 4,979 11,972 11,975 --
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by
financing activities... 4,001 5,703 13,377 10,723 76,741
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents.......... (924) 1,891 7,843 7,173 71,171
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period........... 1,193 269 2,160 2,160 10,003
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period................. $ 269 $ 2,160 $ 10,003 $ 9,333 $ 81,174
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid during the period
for interest................ $ 48 $ 138 $ 168 $ 74 $ 207
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
Noncash investing and financing
activities:
Common Stock issued in
exchange for notes
receivable.................. $ -- $ 400 $ 438 $ 222 $ 1,196
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
Property and equipment
acquired under capital
lease....................... $ 743 $ 838 $ 1,000 $ 422 $ 416
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
Issuance of warrants......... $ -- $ -- $ 274 $ -- $ --
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1--The Company And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies:
The Company
Agile Software Corporation (the "Company") was incorporated in California
on March 13, 1995 and is headquartered in San Jose, California. The Company is
a leading supplier of product content management software for use within and
among companies in a manufacturing supply chain over the Internet. The
Company's suite of software products is designed to improve the ability of all
members of the supply chain to communicate and collaborate with one another
about new or changing information concerning the manufacture, source or supply
of products or components.
Principles of consolidation and basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Agile Software International Corporation. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Interim financial information (unaudited)
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited
but have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements
and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of only
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company's
financial condition at October 31, 1999 and the results of its operations and
cash flows for the six-month periods ended October 31, 1998 and 1999. The
financial data and other information disclosed in the notes to consolidated
financial statements related to these periods is unaudited. The results of
operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results
of operations for the full year.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The majority of the
Company's cash equivalents consist of money market funds.
Concentrations of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. Cash and cash
equivalents are deposited with financial institutions that management believes
are credit worthy.
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and, generally, requires no collateral from its customers. The
Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. To date, the Company has not
experienced any material losses with respect to its accounts receivable.
F-8
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Fair value of financial instruments
The Company's financial instruments, including cash, cash equivalents,
short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable
and capital lease obligations are carried at cost, which approximates their
fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using
the straight-line method based upon the useful lives of the assets, which
range from two to five years, or the lease term of the respective assets.
Software development costs
Software development costs are included in research and development and are
expensed as incurred. After technological feasibility is established, material
software development costs are capitalized. The capitalized cost is then
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated product life, or in the
ratio of current revenues to total projected product revenues, whichever is
greater. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility,
which the Company has defined as the establishment of a working model which
typically occurs when the beta testing commences, and the general availability
of such software has been short and software development costs qualifying for
capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has not
capitalized any software development costs.
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with Statement of Position
("SOP") 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," and SOP 98-9, "Modification of
SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions."
The Company derives revenues from the license of software products under
software license agreements and from the delivery of professional services and
maintenance services. When contracts contain multiple elements, and vendor
specific objective evidence exists for all undelivered elements, the Company
accounts for the delivered elements in accordance with the "Residual Method"
prescribed by Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-9. License revenues are
recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed
or determinable, collectibility is probable, and delivery and customer
acceptance, if required under the terms of the contract, of the software
products have occurred. In the event the Company grants its customers the
right to specified upgrades, license revenue is deferred until delivery of the
specified upgrade. If vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists
for the specified upgrade, then an amount equal to this fair value is
deferred. If vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value does not exist,
then the entire license fee is deferred until the delivery of the specified
upgrade. A provision for the estimated losses on fixed-price contracts is
recognized in the period in which the loss becomes known. Allowances for
estimated returns are provided upon product delivery. In instances where
vendor obligations remain, revenues are deferred until the obligation has been
satisfied. Revenues from professional services consist of implementation and
training services. Training revenues are recognized as the services are
performed. Implementation services are typically performed under fixed-price
contracts and accordingly, revenues are recognized upon customer acceptance.
Maintenance contracts include the right to unspecified upgrades on a when-and-
if available basis, and ongoing support. Maintenance revenues are recognized
ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, which is generally twelve
months.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability
approach which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of
assets and liabilities and their financial statement reported amounts. The
Company records a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when it is
more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.
F-9
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Comprehensive income
Effective May 1, 1998, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income." SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income
and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income, as defined,
includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner
sources. To date, the Company has not had any significant transactions that
are required to be reported in comprehensive income.
Net loss per share
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings per Share" and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 98. Under
the provisions of SFAS No. 128 and SAB No. 98, basic and diluted net loss per
share is computed by dividing the net loss available to holders of Common
Stock for the period by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted net loss per share
excludes potential Common Stock if their effect is antidilutive. Potential
Common Stock consists of unvested restricted Common Stock, incremental common
shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and shares
issuable upon conversion of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series
E and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net
loss per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months
Fiscal Year Ended April Ended October
30, 31,
-------------------------- ----------------
1997 1998 1999 1998 1999
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Numerator:
Net loss................... $(4,836) $(8,942) $(11,428) $(5,313) $(8,359)
======= ======= ======== ======= =======
Denominator:
Weighted average shares.... 2,414 3,467 4,140 4,070 10,361
Weighted average unvested
shares of Common Stock
subject to repurchase..... (1,114) (1,338) (1,188) (1,256) (1,097)
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Denominator for basic and
diluted calculation....... 1,300 2,129 2,952 2,814 9,264
======= ======= ======== ======= =======
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted.......... $ (3.72) $ (4.20) $ (3.87) $ (1.89) $ (.90)
======= ======= ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
F-10
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following table sets forth potential shares of Common Stock that are
not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation above because to do
so would be anti-dilutive as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of
As of April 30, October 31,
-------------------- ------------
1997 1998 1999 1998 1999
------ ------ ------ ------ -----
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Series A Preferred Stock................. 1,233 1,233 1,233 1,233 --
Series B Preferred Stock................. 2,938 2,938 2,938 2,938 --
Series C Preferred Stock................. 3,575 3,575 3,575 3,575 --
Series D Preferred Stock................. 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 --
Series E Preferred Stock................. -- 1,000 1,000 1,000 --
Series F Preferred Stock................. -- -- 1,778 1,778 --
Preferred Stock warrants................. 94 98 158 98 98
Unvested Common Stock subject to
repurchase.............................. 1,251 1,361 964 1,203 1,059
Common Stock options..................... 732 527 1,160 847 1,832
------ ------ ------ ------ -----
11,173 12,082 14,156 14,022 2,989
====== ====== ====== ====== =====
</TABLE>
Pro forma net loss per share (unaudited)
Pro forma net loss per share for the year ended April 30, 1999 and the six
months ended October 31, 1999 is computed using the weighted average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding, including the pro forma effects of the
automatic conversion of the Company's Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D,
Series E and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred Stock
warrants into shares of the Company's Common Stock effective upon the closing
of the Company's initial public offering as if such conversion occurred on May
1, 1998, or at the date of original issuance, if later. The resulting pro
forma adjustment includes an increase in the weighted average shares used to
compute basic net loss per share of 11,716,000 for the year ended April 30,
1999 and 7,588,000 for the six months ended October 31, 1999. The calculation
of diluted net loss per share excludes potential shares of Common Stock as
their effect would be antidilutive. Pro forma potential Common Stock consist
of unvested Common Stock subject to repurchase rights and incremental shares
of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants.
Stock compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in
accordance with provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and complies with the
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." Under APB No. 25, unearned compensation is based on the
difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the fair value of the
Company's stock and the exercise price. Unearned compensation is amortized and
expensed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
Interpretation No. 28. The Company accounts for stock issued to non-employees
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task
Force No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or
Services."
Foreign currency translation
The Company uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency in all foreign
locations expect for France. The balance sheet accounts are translated into
United States dollars at the end-of-period exchange rates except for fixed
assets, which are translated at historical exchange rates. Revenue and
expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during each
period. Gains and losses resulting from translation are accumulated as a
component of stockholders' equity. Net gains or losses resulting from foreign
currency exchange transactions are included in the consolidated statement of
operations and were not significant during any of the periods presented.
F-11
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Segment information
Effective May 1, 1998, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
"Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." The
Company identifies its operating segments based on business activities,
management responsibility and geographical location. During each of the three
years in the period ended April 30, 1999, the Company operated in a single
business segment, primarily in the United States. Through April 30, 1999,
foreign operations have not been significant in either revenue or investment
in long-lived assets.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In March 1998, the AICPA issued SOP No. 98-1, "Accounting for the Cost of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP No. 98-1 will
be effective for the Company's fiscal year ending April 30, 2000. SOP No. 98-1
provides guidance on accounting for computer software developed or obtained
for internal use including the requirement to capitalize specified costs and
amortization of such costs. The Company does not expect the adoption of SOP
No. 98-1 to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivatives and
Hedging Activities." This statement establishes accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments
embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 will be
effective for the Company's fiscal year ending April 30, 2001. The adoption of
SFAS No. 133 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's
results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year consolidated
financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
Note 2--Balance Sheet Components (in thousands):
Property and equipment comprise the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of
April 30, As of
--------------- October 31,
1998 1999 1999
------ ------- -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computer hardware and software.................. $2,087 $ 3,214 $ 4,506
Furniture and equipment......................... 508 828 1,261
Leasehold improvements.......................... 34 46 255
------ ------- -------
2,629 4,088 6,022
Less: accumulated depreciation.................. (935) (2,115) (2,858)
------ ------- -------
$1,694 $ 1,973 $ 3,164
====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
Accrued expenses and other liabilities comprise the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of
April 30, As of
-------------- October 31,
1998 1999 1999
------ ------- -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accrued employee costs............................ $ 661 $ 1,770 $2,036
Sales taxes payable............................... 151 172 104
Accrued professional fees......................... 125 400 488
Other............................................. 290 1,276 2,187
------ ------- ------
$1,227 $ 3,618 $4,815
====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
F-12
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 3--Borrowings:
Notes payable
Notes payable consist of amounts payable to equipment financing companies
and are collateralized by the underlying assets as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of
April 30, As of
----------- October 31,
1998 1999 1999
---- ------ -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
11.75% note; interest payable monthly; principal
payable monthly commencing September 1999; matures
February 2002........................................ $-- $1,000 $--
11.75% note; interest payable monthly; principal
payable monthly commencing November 1999; matures
March 2002........................................... -- 1,000 --
11.75% note; interest payable monthly; principal
payable monthly commencing December 1999; matures
April 2002........................................... -- 1,000 --
Non-interest bearing note; principal payable upon
maturity in July 2002................................ 39 39 39
--- ------ ---
39 3,039 39
Less: current portion................................. -- (686) --
--- ------ ---
Notes payable, non-current............................ $39 $2,353 $39
=== ====== ===
</TABLE>
Future minimum principal payments under the notes at April 30, 1999 are as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ending April 30,
----------------------------
<S> <C>
2000................................................................. $ 686
2001................................................................. 1,181
2002................................................................. 1,133
2003................................................................. 39
------
Total payments....................................................... $3,039
======
</TABLE>
Bank line-of-credit
As of April 30, 1999, the Company had a $2,000,000 line-of-credit agreement
with a bank that provides for borrowings of up to $2,000,000, including
$250,000 available for the issuance of letters of credit and foreign currency
exchange activity. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at an
annual rate of 8.5%, subject to adjustment by the bank. The interest rate was
8.5% at April 30, 1999. Borrowings under the line of credit are secured by the
assets of the Company. As of April 30, 1998 and 1999, $1,000,000 and no
amount, respectively, were outstanding under the line. The credit agreement
expires in August 1999. In connection with this line-of-credit, the Company is
required to meet certain monthly financial tests, including a minimum tangible
net worth and a minimum quick ratio. At April 30, 1999, the Company was in
compliance with all financial covenants.
Note 4--Income Taxes:
The Company's operating losses are generated domestically, and amounts
attributable to its foreign operations have been insignificant for all periods
presented. For each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 1999, the
Company incurred net operating losses and accordingly no provision for income
taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been
recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At April
30, 1999, the Company had approximately $20,000,000 of federal and $18,000,000
of state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable
income which expire in varying amounts
F-13
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
beginning in 2016 and 2004, respectively. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986,
the amounts of and benefits from net operating loss carryforwards may be
impaired or limited in certain circumstances. Events which cause limitations
in the amounts of net operating losses that the Company may utilize in any one
year include, but are not limited to, a cumulative ownership change of more
than 50%, as defined, over a three year period.
Deferred taxes comprise the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of April 30,
----------------
1998 1999
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Depreciation............................................. $ 66 $ 67
Other accruals and liabilities........................... 123 398
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards.............. 5,235 8,197
------- -------
Total deferred tax assets................................ 5,424 8,662
Less: Valuation allowance................................ (5,424) (8,662)
------- -------
Net deferred tax assets.................................... $ -- $ --
======= =======
</TABLE>
For financial reporting purposes, the Company has incurred a loss in each
period since its inception. Based on the available objective evidence,
including the Company's history of losses, management believes it is more
likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable.
Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its
net deferred tax assets at April 30, 1998 and 1999.
A reconciliation between the amount of income tax benefit determined by
applying the applicable U.S. statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year
Ended
April 30,
------------------
1997 1998 1999
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal statutory rate................................. (35)% (35)% (35)%
State tax, net of federal impact....................... (6) (6) (6)
Provision for valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets................................................ 41 41 41
--- --- ---
-- % -- % -- %
=== === ===
</TABLE>
F-14
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 5--Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock
Convertible Preferred Stock at April 30, 1999 comprise the following (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Liquidation Proceeds, Net
---------------------- Preference of Issuance
Authorized Outstanding Amount Costs
---------- ----------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Series A.................... 1,500 1,233 $ 123 $ 115
Series B.................... 3,000 2,938 1,040 1,024
Series C.................... 4,000 3,575 4,147 4,124
Series C1................... 4,000 -- -- --
Series D.................... 1,500 1,350 4,001 3,980
Series D1................... 1,500 -- -- --
Series E.................... 1,000 1,000 5,000 4,979
Series E1................... 1,000 -- -- --
Series F.................... 1,838 1,778 12,002 11,972
Series F1................... 1,838 -- -- --
Undesignated................ 10,000 -- -- --
------ ------ ------- -------
31,176 11,874 $26,313 $26,194
====== ====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
Each share of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock is convertible
into one share of Common Stock, at the option of the holder. The conversion
ratio of the Series C Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment for dilution.
Holders of at least 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock have a right of first
offer in connection with any subsequent issuances of Preferred Stock. These
provisions will terminate upon the Company's initial public offering. In the
event that such holders of Series C or Series D Preferred Stock elect not to
participate in certain subsequent financings, their existing shares of Series
C and Series D Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of
Series C1 and Series D1 Preferred Stock, respectively.
Each share of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock automatically
converts into Common Stock upon the closing of an underwritten public offering
with an offering price of at least $8.78 per share and aggregate proceeds of
at least $20,000,000 or upon the consent of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D,
Series D1, Series E and Series E1 Preferred Stock (voting together as a single
class and not as separate series, on an as-converted basis). Each share of
Series F and Series F1 will automatically convert into Common Stock upon the
consent of a majority of the outstanding Series F and Series F1 shares.
Each share of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock has voting rights
equal to the number of shares of Common Stock into which it is convertible. As
long as at least 50% or more of the original issued shares of each respective
class remain outstanding, holders of Series A, Series B and Series C and C1
(Series C and C1 voting as a class) are entitled to elect one director at each
annual election of members of the Board of Directors. Holders of all shares of
Common Stock and Preferred Stock, on an as-converted basis, are entitled to
vote to elect the remaining directors of the Company.
As long as at least 50% of the original Preferred Stock issued remains
outstanding, the Company may not, without prior approval of at least the
majority of the then outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, (a) sell, merge or
consolidate the Company, (b) effect any transaction or series of transactions
which would result in the
F-15
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
dissolution of more than 50% of the voting power of the Company, (c) change
the rights, preferences and privileges of the Preferred Stock or (d) authorize
or issue any equity security or any security convertible into or exercisable
for any equity security having a preference over or equal to those of the
existing Preferred Stock with respect to voting, dividends or liquidation.
Holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock are entitled to
receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, noncumulative annual
dividends of $.01 per share. No dividends on the Preferred Stock or Common
Stock have been declared by the Board of Directors from the Company's
inception through April 30, 1999.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company,
the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock shall be entitled
to receive $.10, $.354, $1.16, $1.16, $2.964, $2.964, $5.00, $5.00, $6.75 and
$6.75 per share, respectively, plus any declared but unpaid dividends.
Thereafter, the remaining assets of the Company will be distributed pro rata
among the holders of Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock and Common Stock
until the holders of Series B, Series C, Series C1, Series D, Series D1,
Series E, Series E1, Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock have received an
aggregate of $.708, $2.32, $2.32, $5.928, $5.928, $10.00, $10.00, $13.50 and
$13.50 per share, respectively. Thereafter, the holders of Common Stock will
receive all of the remaining assets of the Company.
Preferred Stock warrants
In conjunction with certain capital leases and notes payable, the Company
issued warrants to purchase shares of the Company's Preferred Stock as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal
Exercise Year of
Date of Grant Shares Price Expiration Value
-------------- ------ -------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Series B Preferred Stock
warrants...................... September 1995 41,111 $ .354 2003 de minimus
Series C Preferred Stock
warrants...................... March 1996 35,313 1.160 2003 de minimus
Series D Preferred Stock
warrants...................... February 1997 17,828 2.964 2004 de minimus
Series D Preferred Stock
warrants...................... November 1997 4,049 2.964 2005 de minimus
Series F Preferred Stock
warrants...................... February 1999 60,000 6.750 2010 $ 274,000
</TABLE>
The Company calculated the minimum fair value of all warrants on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as prescribed by SFAS
No. 123 with the following underlying assumptions: expected volatility of 50%,
risk free interest rates ranging from 4.7% to 6.3% and terms ranging from 7 to
10.5 years.
The Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Stock warrants are
exercisable for the period stated above or three years from the effective date
of the Company's initial public offering, whichever is longer. The Series F
Preferred Stock warrants are exercisable for the shorter of the period stated
above or immediately prior to the Company's initial public offering. Upon
completion of the Company's initial public offering, the Series F Preferred
Stock warrants expire. If the Company's initial public offering yields
proceeds of not less than $14.00 per share, then the warrant shall be
exercisable for no more than 45,000 shares of Series F Preferred Stock or the
Common Stock issuable upon conversion thereof. The Company records the expense
related to the warrants over the life of the associated financing instrument
as interest expense. At April 30, 1999, the Company had unamortized interest
of $253,000 related to warrants issued in connection with $3.0 million of
subordinated notes payable which were issued during fiscal 1999. The Company
plans to use proceeds from its initial public offering to prepay these
subordinated notes payable in their entirety. As a result, the Company will
recognize the unamortized interest balance as an expense in the period it
prepays the notes payable in entirety.
F-16
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Common Stock
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes the
Company to issue 100,000,000 shares of $.001 par value Common Stock.
The Company has granted stock to certain founders and granted stock to
certain employees under a restricted stock plan. Through April 30, 1999, the
Company had sold 2,269,775 shares of Common Stock to such founders and
employees that were subject to certain repurchase rights by the Company. The
Company has a right of first offer in connection with any proposed sale or
transfer of these shares and has the right to repurchase these shares at the
original issue price. The Company's right to repurchase such shares declines
on a percentage basis, usually over four years, based on the length of the
employees' continual employment with the Company. At April 30, 1999, no shares
of founders restricted stock and 173,371 shares granted under the Company's
restricted stock plan were subject to repurchase at a weighted-average
exercise price of $.69 per share and 76,500 shares were reserved for issuance
as restricted Common Stock in the future. This plan was terminated in June
1999.
Certain of these and other shares were issued in exchange for notes
receivable, which are full recourse and additionally collateralized by the
underlying shares of Common Stock. These notes receivable are payable on
various dates through March 2004 and bear interest at rates ranging from 4.52%
to 7.34%. These notes receivable have been included in stockholders' equity.
At April 30, 1999, the Company had reserved shares of Common Stock for
future issuance as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of
April 30,
1999
---------
<S> <C>
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock............................. 1,500
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock............................. 3,000
Conversion of Series C and Series C1 Preferred Stock............... 8,000
Conversion of Series D and Series D1 Preferred Stock............... 3,000
Conversion of Series E and Series E1 Preferred Stock............... 2,000
Conversion of Series F and Series F1 Preferred Stock............... 3,556
Exercise of Preferred Stock warrants............................... 158
Exercise of Common Stock options................................... 1,405
Issuance of restricted Common Stock................................ 77
</TABLE>
Note 6--Employee Benefit Plans:
401(k) plan
Employees of the Company may elect to participate in the Company's 401(k)
plan. The Company does not make contributions to the 401(k) plan.
Stock option plan
In May 1995, the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")
which, as amended, provides for the issuance of incentive and nonqualified
stock options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company. Under
the Plan, 3,375,000 shares have been authorized for issuance. Options granted
under the Plan are for periods not to exceed ten years and options must be
issued at prices not less than 100% and 85%, for incentive and nonqualified
stock options, respectively, of the estimated fair value of the stock on the
date of grant as determined by the Board of Directors. Options granted to
shareholders who own greater than 10% of
F-17
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
the outstanding stock are for periods not to exceed five years, and must be
issued at prices not less than 110% of the estimated fair value of the stock
on the date of grant. Options are exercisable upon grant and generally vest
25% or 20% at the end of the first year and at a rate of 1/36 or 1/48 per
month thereafter such that they vest over four or five years, respectively.
The following table summarizes activity under the Plan (shares in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
Shares Average
Available Number Exercise
for Grant Outstanding Price
--------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at April 30, 1996........................ 372 406 $ .10
Options authorized............................. 575 -- --
Options granted................................ (933) 933 .24
Options exercised.............................. -- (564) .12
Options canceled............................... 43 (43) .18
------ ------
Balance at April 30, 1997........................ 57 732 .26
Options authorized............................. 800 -- --
Options granted................................ (857) 857 .63
Options exercised.............................. -- (1,027) .31
Options canceled............................... 35 (35) .56
Unvested shares repurchased.................... 43 -- --
------ ------
Balance at April 30, 1998........................ 78 527 .84
Options authorized............................. 1,000 -- --
Options granted................................ (978) 978 2.57
Options exercised.............................. -- (315) 1.42
Options canceled............................... 30 (30) 1.70
Unvested shares repurchased.................... 115 -- --
------ ------
Balance at April 30, 1999........................ 245 1,160 2.12
Options authorized (unaudited)................. 2,000 -- --
Options granted (unaudited).................... (1,303) 1,303 11.17
Options exercised (unaudited).................. -- (463) 2.98
Options canceled (unaudited)................... 168 (168) 2.92
Unvested shares repurchased (unaudited)........ 14 -- --
------ ------
Balance at October 31, 1999 (unaudited).......... 1,124 1,832 8.25
====== ======
</TABLE>
At April 30, 1999, 790,235 outstanding shares of Common Stock purchased
under the Plan were subject to repurchase. Upon termination of employment,
unvested shares previously purchased under the Plan are subject to repurchase
by the Company at a price equal to the exercise price.
F-18
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following table summarizes the information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable as of April 30, 1999 (shares in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Vested
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
-------------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Range of Remaining Average Average
Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life (Years) Price Outstanding Price
------------ ----------- ------------ -------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$.015 - .45 83 7.97 $ .36 38 $ .35
.50 - 1.25 154 8.54 .91 52 .86
1.45 - 2.50 454 9.20 2.19 18 1.91
2.65 - 3.00 469 9.71 2.77 -- --
----- ---
1,160 9.23 2.12 108 .86
===== ===
</TABLE>
Fair value disclosures
The Company calculated the minimum fair value of each option grant under
the Plan on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as
prescribed by SFAS No. 123 with the followings underlying assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended April 30,
-----------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Dividend yield.............................. -- -- --
Expected volatility......................... -- -- --
Average risk free interest rate............. 6.3% 6.0% 5.7%
Expected life (in years).................... 5 5 5
Weighted average fair value of options
granted.................................... $ .07 $ .17 $ .64
Had compensation cost for options granted under the Plan been determined
based on the fair value at the grant dates for the awards under a method
prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss would have been increased
to the pro forma amounts below for the fiscal years ended April 30, 1997, 1998
and 1999, respectively (in thousands, except per share amounts):
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended April 30,
-----------------------------
1997 1998 1999
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss as reported........................ $ (4,836) $ (8,942) $ (11,428)
Pro forma net loss.......................... (4,843) (8,973) (11,529)
Net loss per share as reported.............. (3.72) (4.20) (3.87)
Pro forma net loss per share................ (3.73) (4.21) (3.91)
</TABLE>
Because the determination of the fair value of all options granted after
the Company becomes a public entity will include an expected volatility factor
in addition to the factors described above and because additional option
grants are expected to be made each year, the compensation expense for options
granted during each of the three years in the period ended April 30, 1999 are
not representative of the pro forma effects of option grants on reported net
income (loss) for future years.
F-19
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Unearned stock compensation
In connection with certain stock option grants during the years ended April
30, 1998 and 1999, the Company recorded unearned stock compensation cost
totaling $3,093,000 and $4,963,000, respectively, which is being recognized
over the vesting period of the related options of five years. Amortization of
unearned stock compensation totaled $856,000 and $2,253,000 for the years
ended April 30, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
Note 7--Commitments And Contingencies:
Leases
The Company has entered into noncancelable operating leases for office
space and equipment and capital leases for equipment with original terms
ranging from 12 to 60 months. The terms of certain operating leases provide
for rental payments on a graduated scale. The Company recognizes expense on a
straight-line basis over the lease period and has accrued for rent expense
incurred but not paid. The future minimum lease payments under these leases at
April 30, 1999 are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Operating Capital
Fiscal Year Ending April 30, Leases Leases
---------------------------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
2000...................................................... $1,061 $ 843
2001...................................................... 967 598
2002...................................................... 339 292
2003...................................................... 56 58
------ ------
Total minimum lease payments.............................. $2,423 1,791
======
Less: Amount representing interest........................ (185)
------
Present value of capital lease obligations................ 1,606
Less: Current portion..................................... (735)
------
Capital lease obligations, noncurrent..................... $ 871
======
</TABLE>
Property and equipment under capital leases are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of
April 30,
---------------
1998 1999
------ -------
<S> <C> <C>
Computer hardware and software.............................. $1,519 $ 2,338
Furniture and equipment..................................... 289 470
------ -------
1,808 2,808
Less: Accumulated depreciation.............................. (710) (1,558)
------ -------
$1,098 $ 1,250
====== =======
</TABLE>
Rent expense under noncancelable operating leases was approximately
$160,000, net of sublease rental income of $28,000, for the year ended April
30, 1997, $396,000 for the year ended April 30, 1998 and $568,000, net of
sublease rental income of $208,000, for the year ended April 30, 1999.
Contingencies
As of April 30, 1999, the Company was involved in litigation with
Facilities Management International. The complaint against the Company, filed
in the Orange County Superior Court, alleges interference with prospective
economic advantage and unfair business practices in connection with the
Company's quote for
F-20
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
services to a customer. The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory and
punitive damages as well as injunctive relief. The Company intends to
vigorously defend itself against the claim. The Company believes that the
ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse affect on its
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 8--Subsequent Events:
Reincorporation
In June 1999, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the
reincorporation of the Company in the State of Delaware. As a result of the
reincorporation, the Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of
$.001 par value Common Stock and 31,175,556 shares of $.001 par value
Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the
undesignated Preferred Stock in one or more series and to fix the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. The par value of the
Preferred Stock and shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock authorized in
the consolidated balance sheet at April 30, 1998 and 1999 and in consolidated
statement of stockholders' equity for the each of the three years in the
period ended April 30, 1999 have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the
reincorporation.
Initial public offering
In June 1999, the Company's Board of Directors authorized management to
file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to
permit the Company to sell shares of its Common Stock to the public.
On August 2, 1999, the Company entered into agreements to sell shares of
Common Stock in a private placement with two separate corporate investors for
$5.0 million each. On August 16, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement
to sell shares of Common Stock in a private placement with one corporate
investor for $3.0 million. The sale of Common Stock to each of these three
investors will occur contemporaneous with the Company's initial public
offering and the number of shares issued to the corporate investors will be
calculated by dividing the amount invested by the offering price per share
less an amount equal to the underwriter's commissions and discounts per share.
Stock option plan
Subsequent to April 30, 1999, the Board adopted an increase in the number
of shares reserved for issuance under the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan by
an additional 2,000,000 shares. This reserve will be automatically increased
on the first day of each fiscal year beginning on and after May 1, 2001 by the
lesser of 500,000 shares per year, 5% of the number of shares of the Company's
Common Stock which were issued and outstanding on the last day of the
preceding fiscal year or a number of shares determined by the Company's board
of directors.
Employee stock purchase plan
In June 1999, the Board adopted the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"Purchase Plan") which will become effective on the date of the Company's
initial public offering, and reserved 500,000 shares of Common Stock for
issuance thereunder. This reserve will be automatically increased on May 1,
2000 and on each May 1 thereafter until and including May 1, 2009, by an
amount equal to the lesser of 500,000 shares per year, 2% of the number of
shares of Common Stock which are issued and outstanding on the last day of the
preceding fiscal year or a number of shares determined by the Company's board
of directors. Employees generally will be eligible to participate in the
Purchase Plan if they are customarily employed by the Company
F-21
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
for more than 20 hours per week and more than five months in a fiscal year
end. The first Offering Period is expected to begin on the first business day
on which price quotations for the Company's Common Stock are available.
Depending on the effective date, the first Offering Period may be more or less
than 24 months long. Offering Periods and Purchase Periods thereafter will
begin on the first day of May and September of each year. In general, the
price at which the Common Stock is purchased under the Purchase Plan is 85% of
the lesser of the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the first
day of the applicable Offering Period or on the purchase date. Employees
generally may not purchase more than 1,000 shares in a six-month period or
stock having a value greater than $25,000 in any calendar year as measured at
the beginning of the offering period.
Bank line-of-credit
In July 1999, the Company renewed its existing line of credit through
August 2000 and increased the line of credit to provide for borrowings of up
to $5,000,000, including $500,000 available for the issuance of letters of
credit and foreign currency exchange activity. Borrowings under the credit
agreement bear interest at an annual rate of 8.5%, subject to adjustment by
the bank. Borrowings under the line of credit are secured by the assets of the
Company. As of October 31, 1999 no amount was outstanding under the line. In
connection with this line-of-credit, the Company is required to meet certain
monthly financial tests, including a minimum tangible net worth and a minimum
quick ratio. At October 31, 1999, the Company was in compliance with all
financial covenants.
Note 9--Subsequent Events (Unaudited):
Completion of initial public offering
In August 1999, the Company completed its initial public offering of
3,450,000 shares of Common Stock, including the exercise of the underwriter's
overallotment option, at $21.00 per share. Net proceeds to the Company totaled
$57.6 million. Simultaneous with the closing of the initial public offering,
the Company sold an aggregate of 665,641 shares of Common Stock at $19.53
share in private placements to three corporate investors. Upon the closing of
the initial public offering, the outstanding 11,873,273 shares of Preferred
Stock were converted into to Common Stock and a warrant to purchase 60,000
shares of common stock at $6.75 per share was exercised.
Stock compensation
During the period May 1, 1999 through October 31, 1999, the Company granted
options to employees and consultants to purchase an aggregate of 1,303,000
shares of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $5.00 to $65.50 per
share. The Company has recorded additional unearned stock compensation with
respect to stock option grants to employees and to non-employee consultants
made subsequent to April 30, 1999 of $17.8 million. Included within the
1,303,000 options granted subsequent to year end are 70,000 options granted to
consultants. The Company is accounting for these options granted to
consultants under variable plan accounting and has calculated the minimum fair
value of these options on the date of grant of $6.4 million using the Black-
Scholes option pricing model as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 with the following
underlying assumptions: expected volatility of 75%, risk-free interest rate of
5.9% and option terms of ten years. The Company will record an expense each
quarter relating to these options over the vesting period of the options.
Acquisition of DMI
On November 23, 1999, the Company acquired Digital Market, Inc. ("DMI") in
a merger transaction to be accounted for as a purchase business combination.
The purchase price included $20.0 million in cash, and
F-22
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
approximately $79.2 million in Common Stock based upon the issuance of 611,765
shares of Common Stock at the average price of the Company's Common Stock a
number of days before and after the transaction measurment date in exchange
for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock and warrants of Digital
Market. In addition, the Company assumed all of the unvested outstanding
options to purchase DMI Common Stock under its stock option plans. The
estimated fair value of the assumed options is approximately $7.8 million and
was included as a component of the purchase price. The Company also
anticipates incurring approximately $2.0 million in acquisition expenses,
including financial advisory and legal fees and other direct transaction
costs. The total purchase price of DMI was $109.0 million.
The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair
values. The aggregated purchase price was allocated as follows, based on a
preliminary independent appraisal of DMI and management estimates (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Net tangible liabilities of DMI................................... $ (2,295)
In-process research and development............................... 1,300
Existing technology............................................... 2,050
Trademarks........................................................ 150
Workforce in place................................................ 2,100
Goodwill.......................................................... 105,695
--------
$109,000
========
</TABLE>
This allocation is subject to change pending a final analysis of the total
purchase cost and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. The net tangible liabilities of DMI consist primarily of cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, property and equipment, accounts
payable and other liabilities and notes payable. In-process research and
development has not reached the stage of technological feasibility at the
acquisition date, and will be immediately charged to operations. Existing
technology, trademarks and workforce in place will be amortized over their
estimated useful lives of three, three and four years, respectively. The
purchase price in excess of net tangible liabilities and identifiable
intangible assets will be allocated to goodwill, and amortized over its
expected useful life of three years.
Note 10--Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
--------------------------------------
Jul. 31, Oct. 31, Jan. 31, Apr. 30,
1998 1998 1999 1999
-------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands, except per share
1999: amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues........................... $ 3,241 $ 3,812 $ 4,592 $ 5,162
Gross profit............................. 2,083 2,475 2,845 3,419
Loss from operations..................... (2,624) (2,839) (2,902) (3,241)
Net loss................................. (2,572) (2,741) (2,838) (3,277)
Net loss per share--basic and diluted.... (.94) (.96) (.94) (1.02)
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
--------------------------------------
Jul. 31, Oct. 31, Jan. 31, Apr. 30,
1997 1997 1998 1998
-------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands, except per share
1998: amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues........................... $ 1,179 $ 1,669 $ 2,128 $ 3,027
Gross profit............................. 842 1,151 1,545 2,297
Loss from operations..................... (1,610) (2,370) (2,266) (2,628)
Net loss................................. (1,612) (2,396) (2,289) (2,645)
Net loss per share--basic and diluted.... (.89) (1.20) (1.02) (1.07)
</TABLE>
F-23
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OVERVIEW
On November 23, 1999, Agile Software Corporation ("Agile" or the "Company")
acquired Digital Market, Inc. ("DMI") in a merger transaction to be accounted
for as a purchase business combination. Agile paid $20.0 million in cash and
approximately $79.2 million in Common Stock, based upon the issuance of
611,765 shares of Common Stock at the average price of the Company's Common
Stock a number of days before and after the transaction measurement date. In
addition, the Company also assumed all unvested outstanding stock options
granted by DMI. The estimated fair value of the assumed options is
approximately $7.8 million, and was included as a component of the purchase
price. The Company also anticipates incurring approximately $2.0 million in
acquisition expenses, including financial advisory and legal fees and other
direct transaction costs.
The total acquisition price of $109.0 million was allocated to the assets
acquired, including tangible and intangible assets, and liabilities assumed
based upon the fair value of such assets and liabilities on the date of the
acquisition. The total estimated purchase cost of the acquisition has been
allocated on a preliminary basis to assets and liabilities based on
management's estimates of their fair value and a preliminary independent
appraisal of certain intangible assets with the excess costs over the net
assets acquired allocated to goodwill. This allocation is subject to change
pending a final analysis of the total purchase cost and the fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The aggregate purchase price was
allocated as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Net tangible liabilities...................................... $ (2,295)
In-process technology......................................... 1,300
Existing technology........................................... 2,050
Trademark..................................................... 150
Workforce in place............................................ 2,100
Goodwill...................................................... 105,695
--------
$109,000
========
</TABLE>
The net tangible liabilities consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, property and equipment, accounts payable and
other liabilities and notes payable. DMI's net tangible liabilities as of
September 30, 1999 were used for purposes of calculating the pro forma
adjustments as the transaction has not been completed and approximate their
fair value at such date. Because the in-process technology had not reached the
stage of technological feasibility at the acquisition date and had no
alternative future use, the amount was immediately charged to operations. The
amount allocated to existing technology, trademarks and workforce in place are
being amortized over the estimated useful lives of three, three and four
years, respectively. The purchase price in excess of identified tangible and
intangible assets is allocated as goodwill. As a result of the rapid
technological changes occurring in the software and Internet industries,
goodwill is being amortized over the estimated useful life of three years. The
valuation for the intangible assets has been determined using management's
assumptions and the preliminary reports from an independent appraiser.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet gives effect to
the merger of Agile and DMI as if such transaction occurred on October 31,
1999. The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet combines the unaudited
consolidated balance sheet of Agile as of October 31, 1999 and the unaudited
balance sheet of DMI as of September 30, 1999.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations
presents the results of operations of Agile for the year ended April 30, 1999
and the six-month period ended October 31, 1999, combined with the statement
of operations of DMI for the year ended March 31, 1999 and the six-month
period ended September 30, 1999. The unaudited pro forma combined statements
of operations gives effect to this acquisition as if it had occurred as of May
1, 1998.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating
results or financial position that would have occurred if the transaction had
been consummated at the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of
future operating results or the financial position of the combined companies.
F-24
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Agile DMI
----------- -------------
As of As of Pro Forma
October 31, September 30, -----------------------------
1999 1999 Adjustments Combined
----------- ------------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash
equivalents.......... $ 81,174 $ 128 $(20,000)(A) $ 61,302
Accounts receivable,
net.................. 4,467 339 -- 4,806
Other current assets.. 2,451 129 (1,250)(D) 1,330
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total current assets.... 88,092 596 (21,250) 67,438
Property and equipment,
net.................... 3,164 604 -- 3,768
Intangible assets....... -- -- 109,995 (B) 109,995
Other assets............ 209 -- -- 209
-------- -------- -------- --------
$ 91,465 $ 1,200 $ 88,745 $181,410
======== ======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable...... $ 603 $ 680 $ -- $ 1,283
Accrued expenses and
other liabilities.... 4,815 1,986 2,000 (C) 8,801
Deferred revenue...... 5,655 175 -- 5,830
Current portion of
capital lease
obligations.......... 809 -- -- 809
Current portion of
notes payable........ -- 556 (250)(D) 306
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total current
liabilities............ 11,882 3,397 1,750 17,029
Capital lease
obligations,
noncurrent............. 819 -- -- 819
Notes payable,
noncurrent............. 39 98 -- 137
-------- -------- -------- --------
12,740 3,495 1,750 17,985
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock....... -- 179 (179)(F) --
Common Stock.......... 21 5 (5)(F) 21
Additional paid-in
capital.............. 134,488 13,024 73,976 (E)(F) 221,488
Notes receivable from
stockholders......... (1,826) -- -- (1,826)
Unearned stock
compensation......... (19,066) (447) 447 (F) (19,066)
Accumulated deficit... (34,892) (15,056) 12,756 (D)(F)(J) (37,192)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total stockholders'
equity................. 78,725 (2,295) 86,995 163,425
-------- -------- -------- --------
$ 91,465 $ 1,200 $ 88,745 $181,410
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-25
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share date)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Agile DMI
----------- -------------
Six Months Ended Pro Forma
------------------------- ----------------------
October 31, September 30,
1999 1999 Adjustments Combined
----------- ------------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues.............. $12,825 $ 405 $ -- $ 13,230
Total cost of revenues...... 3,178 701 629(G) 4,508
------- ------- -------- --------
Gross profit................ 9,647 (296) (629) 8,722
------- ------- -------- --------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing....... 10,013 1,207 -- 11,220
Research and development.. 3,194 2,150 -- 5,344
General and
administrative........... 1,505 685 -- 2,190
Amortization of stock
compensation............. 3,658 -- -- 3,658
Goodwill amortization..... -- -- 17,616(H) 17,616
------- ------- -------- --------
Total operating
expenses............... 18,370 4,042 17,616 40,028
------- ------- -------- --------
Loss from operations........ (8,723) (4,338) (18,245) (31,306)
Interest income/(expense),
net........................ 364 (306) -- 58
------- ------- -------- --------
Net loss from continuing
operations................. $(8,359) $(4,644) $(18,245) $(31,248)
======= ======= ======== ========
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted......... $ (.90) $ (3.16)
======= ========
Weighted average shares... 9,264 9,876(I)
======= ========
</TABLE>
F-26
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Agile DMI
-------- ---------
Fiscal Year Ended Pro Forma
------------------- -----------------------
April March 31,
30, 1999 1999 Adjustments Combined
-------- --------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues.................. $ 16,807 $ 1,486 $ -- $ 18,293
Total cost of revenues.......... 5,985 1,190 1,258 (G) 8,433
-------- ------- -------- --------
Gross profit.................... 10,822 296 (1,258) 9,860
-------- ------- -------- --------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing........... 13,495 1,863 -- 15,358
Research and development...... 4,742 2,966 -- 7,708
General and administrative.... 1,938 826 -- 2,764
Amortization of stock
compensation................. 2,253 -- -- 2,253
In-process research and
development.................. -- -- 1,300 (J) 1,300
Goodwill amortization......... -- -- 35,232 (H) 35,232
-------- ------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses.... 22,428 5,655 36,532 64,615
-------- ------- -------- --------
Loss from operations............ (11,606) (5,359) (37,790) (54,755)
Interest income, net............ 178 112 -- 290
-------- ------- -------- --------
Net loss from continuing
operations..................... $(11,428) $(5,247) $(37,790) $(54,465)
======== ======= ======== ========
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted............. $ (3.87) $ (15.28)
======== ========
Weighted average shares....... 2,952 3,564 (I)
======== ========
</TABLE>
F-27
<PAGE>
AGILE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(unaudited)
The following adjustments were applied to Agile's historical financial
statements and those of DMI to arrive at the pro forma combined financial
information.
(A) To reflect cash payment of $20.0 million for the acquisition of DMI.
(B) To record the allocation of the purchase price of DMI as described in the
overview.
(C) To reflect anticipated acquisition expenses of $2.0 million.
(D) To adjust for advances to DMI for operating expenses as of September 30,
1999 and during October 1999 as if DMI were a consolidating entity.
(E) To reflect the acquisition of DMI assuming the issuance of 611,765 shares
of Agile's Common Stock valued at $79.2 million and the assumption of
outstanding DMI stock options valued at approximately $7.8 million.
(F) To eliminate the historical equity accounts of DMI.
(G) To record the amortization of identifiable intangible assets related to
the acquisition of DMI as if the transaction occurred on May 1, 1998.
Identifiable intangible assets recorded in relation to the acquisition
were approximately $4.3 million and are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over three years for existing technology and trademark, and four
years for workforce in place.
(H) To record the amortization of goodwill related to the acquisition of DMI
as if the transaction occurred on May 1, 1998. Goodwill recorded in
relation to the acquisition was approximately $105.7 million and is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over three years.
(I) Weighted average shares used to calculate pro forma basic and diluted net
loss per share for the period presented is computed using the weighted
average number of Common Stock outstanding for the period presented and
the shares to be issued in conjunction with the acquisition of DMI as if
such shares were outstanding from May 1, 1998.
(J) The in-process research and development charge related to the acquisition
has been reflected in the historical statements of operations as if the
transaction occurred on May 1, 1998.
F-28
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors
Digital Market, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Digital Market, Inc.
(the Company), as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of
operations, shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Digital Market, Inc. as of
March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999 in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations since inception and has an accumulated deficit that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
June 18, 1999, except as to Note 11,
which is as of October 10, 1999
F-29
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of As of March 31,
September 30, -------------------------
1999 1999 1998
------------- ------------ -----------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents......... $ 128,343 $ 1,287,974 $ 555,072
Accounts receivable............... 338,852 878,534 18,010
Prepaid expenses.................. 121,091 67,591 38,759
Other current assets.............. 7,320 -- 2,660
------------ ------------ -----------
Total current assets................ 595,606 2,234,099 614,501
Property and equipment, net......... 604,415 641,484 558,168
------------ ------------ -----------
$ 1,200,021 $ 2,875,583 $ 1,172,669
============ ============ ===========
<CAPTION>
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................. $ 679,945 $ 348,755 $ 381,842
Accrued expenses.................. 288,652 182,522 123,847
Deferred revenue.................. 175,254 99,927 61,522
Bridge loan from shareholders..... 1,697,054 -- 1,137,482
Current maturities of long-term
debt............................. 555,638 361,704 124,412
------------ ------------ -----------
Total current liabilities........... 3,396,543 992,908 1,829,105
Long-term debt, less current
maturities......................... 98,077 203,578 302,009
------------ ------------ -----------
3,494,620 1,196,486 2,131,114
------------ ------------ -----------
Shareholders' (deficit) equity:
Convertible Preferred Stock;
19,769,359 shares authorized:
Series A; $.01 par value;
1,950,686 shares designated;
1,950,686 shares issued and
outstanding; liquidation
preference of $356,000......... 19,507 19,507 19,507
Series B; $.01 par value;
7,366,181 shares designated;
6,221,053, 6,138,484, and
6,138,484 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively,
liquidation preference of
$3,800,441, $3,750,000 and
$3,750,000 respectively........ 62,211 61,385 61,385
Series C; $.01 par value;
10,452,492 shares designated;
9,780,027 shares issued and
outstanding; liquidation
preference of $7,895,416....... 97,800 97,800 --
Common stock; $.001 par value;
30,000,000 shares authorized;
5,005,928, 4,761,378, and
4,400,317 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively...... 5,006 4,761 4,400
Additional paid-in capital........ 13,024,090 11,907,212 4,129,882
Shareholder note receivable....... -- -- (9,000)
Deferred stock-based
compensation..................... (447,119) -- --
Accumulated deficit .............. (15,056,094) (10,411,568) (5,164,619)
------------ ------------ -----------
Total shareholders' (deficit)
equity........................... (2,294,599) 1,679,097 (958,445)
------------ ------------ -----------
$ 1,200,021 $ 2,875,583 $ 1,172,669
============ ============ ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-30
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
September 30, Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
------------------------ -------------------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998 1997
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Software license...... $ 287,356 $ -- $ 396,130 $ -- $ --
Contract revenue...... -- -- 850,032 1,600,000 550,000
Maintenance and
other................ 118,056 33,307 239,744 133,069 74,014
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total revenues...... 405,412 33,307 1,485,906 1,733,069 624,014
Cost of revenues:....... (701,545) (465,914) (1,190,469) (761,408) (184,770)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Gross profit (deficit).. (296,133) (432,607) 295,437 971,661 439,244
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing... 1,206,751 756,365 1,862,965 1,335,979 803,803
Research and
development.......... 2,149,652 1,461,592 2,965,583 1,545,569 1,474,827
General and
administrative....... 685,391 366,762 826,043 560,238 291,268
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating
expenses........... 4,041,794 2,584,719 5,654,591 3,441,786 2,569,898
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Loss from operations.... (4,337,927) (3,017,326) (5,359,154) (2,470,125) (2,130,654)
Interest income......... 6,872 120,291 193,906 24,033 61,673
Interest expense........ (313,471) (67,398) (81,701) (103,720) --
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss................ $(4,644,526) $(2,964,433) $(5,246,949) $(2,549,812) $(2,068,981)
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-31
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Convertible Preferred Stock
----------------------------------------------------- Notes
Series A Series B Series C Common Stock Additional Receivable Deferred
----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Paid-In From Stock-Based
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Shareholder Compensation
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------ ----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances as of
March 31, 1996.. 1,950,686 $19,507 -- $ -- -- $ -- 3,866,667 $3,867 $ 329,453 $ -- $ --
Issuance of
Series B
Convertible
Preferred Stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$35,883......... -- -- 6,138,484 61,385 -- -- -- -- 3,652,974 -- --
Issuance of
warrants for the
purchase of
Series B
Convertible
Preferred
Stock........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 73,662 -- --
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options... -- -- -- -- -- -- 450,000 450 8,550 (9,000) --
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
warrants........ -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,400 27 521 -- --
Net loss........ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------
Balances as of
March 31, 1997.. 1,950,686 19,507 6,138,484 61,385 -- -- 4,344,067 4,344 4,065,160 (9,000) --
Issuance of
warrants for the
purchase of
Convertible
Preferred
Stock........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 62,589 -- --
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options... -- -- -- -- -- -- 56,250 56 2,133 -- --
Net loss........ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------
Balances as of
March 31, 1998.. 1,950,686 19,507 6,138,484 61,385 -- -- 4,400,317 4,400 4,129,882 (9,000) --
Issuance of
Series C
Convertible
Preferred Stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$39,191......... -- -- -- -- 9,780,027 97,800 -- -- 7,758,507 -- --
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options... -- -- -- -- -- -- 561,061 561 22,623 -- --
Repurchase of
Common Stock.... -- -- -- -- -- -- (200,000) (200) (3,800) -- --
Repayment of
Shareholder
Note............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,000 --
Net loss........ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------
Balances as of
March 31, 1999.. 1,950,686 19,507 6,138,484 61,385 9,780,027 97,800 4,761,378 4,761 11,907,212 -- --
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options
and warrants
(unaudited)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- 244,550 245 8,942 -- --
Issuance of
Preferred Stock
upon exercise of
warrant
(unaudited)..... -- -- 82,569 826 -- -- -- -- 49,616 -- --
Issuance of
warrants for
bridge loan from
shareholders
(unaudited)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 586,420 -- --
Deferred stock-
based
compensation
(unaudited)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 471,900 -- (471,900)
Amortization of
stock-based
compensation
(unaudited)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,781
Net loss
(unaudited)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------
Balances as of
September 30,
1999
(unaudited)..... 1,950,686 $19,507 6,221,053 $62,211 9,780,027 $97,800 5,005,928 $5,006 $13,024,090 $ -- $(447,119)
========= ======= ========= ======= ========= ======= ========= ====== =========== ======= ==========
<CAPTION>
Total
Shareholders'
Accumulated Equity
Deficit (Deficit)
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Balances as of
March 31, 1996.. $ (545,826) $ (192,999)
Issuance of
Series B
Convertible
Preferred Stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$35,883......... -- 3,714,359
Issuance of
warrants for the
purchase of
Series B
Convertible
Preferred
Stock........... -- 73,662
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options... -- --
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
warrants........ -- 548
Net loss........ (2,068,981) (2,068,981)
------------- -------------
Balances as of
March 31, 1997.. (2,614,807) 1,526,589
Issuance of
warrants for the
purchase of
Convertible
Preferred
Stock........... -- 62,589
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options... -- 2,189
Net loss........ (2,549,812) (2,549,812)
------------- -------------
Balances as of
March 31, 1998.. (5,164,619) (958,445)
Issuance of
Series C
Convertible
Preferred Stock,
net of issuance
costs of
$39,191......... -- 7,856,307
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options... -- 23,184
Repurchase of
Common Stock.... -- (4,000)
Repayment of
Shareholder
Note............ -- 9,000
Net loss........ (5,246,949) (5,246,949)
------------- -------------
Balances as of
March 31, 1999.. (10,411,568) 1,679,097
Issuance of
Common Stock
upon exercise of
stock options
and warrants
(unaudited)..... -- 9,187
Issuance of
Preferred Stock
upon exercise of
warrant
(unaudited)..... -- 50,442
Issuance of
warrants for
bridge loan from
shareholders
(unaudited)..... -- 586,420
Deferred stock-
based
compensation
(unaudited)..... -- --
Amortization of
stock-based
compensation
(unaudited)..... -- 24,781
Net loss
(unaudited)..... (4,644,526) (4,644,526)
------------- -------------
Balances as of
September 30,
1999
(unaudited)..... $(15,056,094) $(2,294,599)
============= =============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-32
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
September 30, Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
------------------------ -------------------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998 1997
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from
operating activities:
Net loss.............. $(4,644,526) $(2,964,433) $(5,246,949) $(2,549,812) $(2,068,981)
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to
net cash used for
operating activities:
Depreciation and
amortization........ 215,774 162,880 370,244 138,366 72,000
Debt discount
amortization........ 254,115 -- 12,518 50,071 --
Amortization of
stock-based
compensation........ 24,781 -- -- -- --
Changes in operating
assets and
liabilities:
Accounts receivable.. 539,682 16,599 (860,524) 266,748 (284,758)
Prepaid expenses..... (53,500) (11,185) (28,832) (20,606) (15,360)
Other current
assets.............. (7,320) 2,521 2,660 -- --
Accounts payable..... 331,190 (157,508) (33,087) (233,260) 588,588
Accrued expenses..... 106,130 (40,308) 58,675 70,765 31,523
Deferred revenue..... 75,327 3,613 38,405 (29,640) 75,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used for
operating
activities......... (3,158,347) (2,987,821) (5,686,890) (2,307,368) (1,601,988)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used for
investing activities:
Capital expenditures.. (178,705) (306,011) (453,560) (367,915) (410,307)
Cash flows from
financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance
of debt.............. 2,442,939 277,870 411,924 1,576,421 --
Repayments of debt.... (911,567) (1,511,235) (1,423,063) -- --
Proceeds from issuance
of Preferred Stock,
net.................. 50,442 7,856,307 7,856,307 -- 3,327,781
Proceeds from issuance
of Common Stock...... 9,187 10,685 23,184 2,189 548
Proceeds from
shareholder note..... -- -- 9,000 -- --
Repurchase of Common
Stock................ -- -- (4,000) -- --
Proceeds from issuance
of Convertible Debt.. -- -- -- -- 256,578
Proceeds from issuance
of Preferred Stock
warrants............. -- -- -- -- 73,662
Proceeds from issuance
of bridge loan
warrants............. 586,420 -- -- -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by
financing
activities......... 2,177,421 6,633,627 6,873,352 1,578,610 3,658,569
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net (decrease) increase
in cash and cash
equivalents........... (1,159,631) 3,339,795 732,902 (1,096,673) 1,646,274
Cash and cash
equivalents at
beginning of period... 1,287,974 555,072 555,072 1,651,745 5,471
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of
period................ $ 128,343 $ 3,894,867 $ 1,287,974 $ 555,072 $ 1,651,745
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Supplemental
disclosures of noncash
investing and
financing activities:
Exercise of Common
Stock options in
exchange for note
receivable........... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 9,000
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Debt converted to
Series B Preferred
Stock................ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 386,578
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Warrants issued in
connection with
bridge loan.......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 62,589 $ --
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Deferred stock-based
compensation......... $ 471,900 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-33
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
1--Business
Digital Market, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in California on
June 30, 1995. The Company provides Internet-based solutions for the sourcing
and procurement of production materials used by manufacturing companies in the
electronics industry.
2--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported results of operations during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(b) Revenue Recognition
Contract revenues are recognized as milestones are achieved.
The Company recognizes software license and maintenance revenue in
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. The Company adopted SOP 97-2 for
software transactions entered into beginning April 1, 1998. SOP 97-2 generally
requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements
such as software products, upgrades, enhancements, post-contract customer
support, installation, and training to be allocated to each element based on
the relative fair values of the elements. The fair value of the element must
be based on evidence that is specific to the vendor. If a vendor does not have
evidence of the fair value for all elements in a multiple-element arrangement,
all revenues from the arrangement are deferred until such evidence exists or
until all elements are delivered.
Revenues from software license agreements are recognized upon shipment of
the software when all of the following criteria have been met: persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred; the fee is fixed or
determinable; and collectibility is probable. Revenues from maintenance
services are recognized ratably over the term of the support period.
In December 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee issued SOP
98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to
Certain Transactions, which requires recognition of revenue using the
"residual method" in multiple-element arrangements when fair value does not
exist for one or more of the delivered elements in the arrangement. Under the
"residual method," the total fair value of the undelivered elements is
deferred and subsequently recognized in accordance with SOP 97-2. The Company
does not expect a material change to its accounting for revenues as a result
of the fiscal 2000 adoption of the provisions of SOP 98-9.
Cost of revenue comprises the costs of providing maintenance services.
There are no significant direct costs related to software license revenue.
Costs associated with contract revenue are included in research and
development costs on the accompanying statements of operations.
(c) Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds. For purposes of the
statements of cash flows the Company considers all highly liquid investments
with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be
cash equivalents.
F-34
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
(d) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation,
which is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
life of the assets, generally three years.
(e) Capitalized Software
Development costs incurred in the research and development of new software
products and enhancements to existing software products are expensed as
incurred until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has
been established. To date, the Company's software development has been
completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility, and,
accordingly, no costs have been capitalized.
(f) Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for
income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount
for which realization is more likely than not.
(g) Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a significant
concentration of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The
Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable,
but historically has not experienced any significant losses.
(h) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock option plan in accordance with the
provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. As such, compensation
expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of
the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. Pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, the Company discloses the pro forma effects of using the fair
value method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements.
(i) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, bridge loan from shareholders and long-term debt, and accounts
payable approximate their respective fair values.
(j) Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which
the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets
to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair
value less cost to sell.
F-35
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
3--Liquidity
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the financial
statements, during the six-month period ended September 30, 1999 and the years
ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company incurred losses of $4,644,526,
$5,246,949 and $2,549,812, respectively, and has an accumulated deficit of
$15,056,094 and $10,411,568 at September 30, 1999 and March 31, 1999,
respectively. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of
time.
The financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the
recoverability of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of
liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue
as a going concern.
The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability
to raise additional capital and ultimately to achieve profitability. The
Company's management is working with banks and investors to raise additional
financing. There can be no assurance that management will be successful in its
endeavors. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing and achieve
profitability, there can be no assurance that the Company can continue as a
going concern.
4--Property and Equipment
Property and equipment as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and September 30,
1999, consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of As of March 30,
September 30, -------------------
1999 1999 1998
------------- ---------- --------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computer equipment....................... $1,135,308 $ 970,406 $586,035
Furniture and fixtures................... 86,279 86,279 74,217
Software................................. 191,802 177,999 120,872
---------- ---------- --------
1,413,389 1,234,684 781,124
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization............................ 808,974 593,200 222,956
---------- ---------- --------
$ 604,415 $ 641,484 $558,168
========== ========== ========
</TABLE>
5--Debt
(a) Bridge Loan
In July and August 1999, the Company received bridge loans from
shareholders. The loans bear interest at a rate of 7.75%. The loans are
convertible into shares of the Company's next preferred stock equity
financing. If not repaid or converted within 30 days, the loans include
provisions for the issuance of warrants to purchase shares of the Company's
next preferred stock financing. The number of such warrants increases every 30
days if the loan is not repaid or converted to preferred stock. The number of
shares, subject to warrants, will be determined based on the closing price of
the next preferred stock equity financing on the date of conversion. If not
repaid or converted before December 31, 1999 the aforementioned warrants
become exercisable into common shares. The number of shares of common stock
will be determined based on the common per share price as defined in the loan
agreements. The estimated $586,420 fair value of these warrants was recorded
as a debt
F-36
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
discount and is being amortized as interest expense over the estimated term of
the bridge loan. The balance and accrued interest outstanding on these loans
as of September 30, 1999 is $1,697,054.
(b) Bank Debt
During fiscal 1999 and 1998, the Company entered into several debt
agreements with a bank. All of the outstanding debt under these agreements
bear interest at the prime rate (7.75% as of September 30, 1999) plus 0.5% or
1%. In addition, as collateral, the bank has a security interest in the
Company's intangible assets, including copyrights, patents, trademarks and all
intellectual property rights in computer software products.
The bank requires the Company to be in compliance with certain financial
covenants. As of September 30, 1999, the Company was in violation of several
of these covenants and has received a letter from the bank waiving the bank's
rights under the default provision through November 30, 1999.
The Company has a loan used for the purchase of equipment and furniture.
The balance outstanding on this loan as of March 31, 1999 and September 30,
1999, was $101,388 and $40,555 respectively and is being repaid in equal
monthly installments of $10,139 through February 2000.
The Company has an equipment line of credit that allowed for maximum
borrowings of $200,000. The Company drew against the line of credit until May
15, 1998, at which time the outstanding balance was converted to a two-year
term loan. Principal on the term loan is being repaid in equal monthly
installments of $3,712 through May 2000. As of March 31, 1999 and September
30, 1999, the outstanding balance of the loan was $51,970 and $29,697,
respectively.
In February 1999, the Company obtained a nonrevolving line of credit that
allows for maximum borrowings of $750,000. The Company may draw against the
line of credit until May 15, 1999, at which time, the outstanding balance will
be converted into a 21-month term loan. Principal on the term loan will be
payable in 21 equal monthly installments beginning June 15, 1999. As of March
31, 1999 and September 30, 1999, the Company had an outstanding balance of
$411,924 and $333,463.
The $98,077 long-term debt, less current maturities as presented in the
accompanying September 30, 1999 balance sheet is due during the Company's
fiscal year ending March 2001.
(c) Convertible Promissory Note
In September 1999, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note
with Agile Software Corporation for up to $2,000,000. The note is convertible
into share of Series C preferred stock at a conversion price of $.81 per
share. The note bears interest at a rate of 7.0%. The note shall be due and
payable on the first to occur of (i) September 15, 2000, (ii) the date of
closing of a third party acquisition of the Company or (iii) the date of
closing of an equity financing by the Company. The balance outstanding on this
note as of September 30, 1999 is $250,000 and this amount is included in
current maturities of long-term debt.
6--Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
(a) Convertible Preferred Stock
The rights, preferences, and privileges of the holders of Series A, B, and
C convertible preferred stock are as follows:
. The holders of Series A, B, and C convertible preferred stock are
entitled to noncumulative annual dividends of $.01825, $.048872, and
$.064584 per share, respectively, if and when declared by the Company's
Board of Directors.
F-37
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
. Shares of Series A, B, and C convertible preferred stock have a
liquidation preference of $.1825, $.6109, and $.8073 per share,
respectively, plus any declared and unpaid dividends.
. Upon liquidation of the Company, any assets remaining after payment of
the liquidation preference amounts to the holders of the convertible
preferred stock will be distributed equally among all the holders of
Series A, B, and C convertible preferred stock and common stock on an "as
if converted" basis. Total distributions to the holders of Series A, B,
and C convertible preferred stock are limited to $.365, $1.2218, and
$1.6146 per share, respectively.
. Each share of convertible preferred stock is convertible at the option of
the holder into one share of common stock, subject to certain
antidilutive adjustments.
. Shares of convertible preferred stock automatically convert to common
stock upon the consent of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares
of preferred stock or upon an initial public offering.
. The holders of Series A, B, and C convertible preferred stock vote
equally with the shareholders of common stock on an "as if converted"
basis.
(b) Warrants
In connection with the issuance of convertible promissory notes in fiscal
1996, the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 517,860 shares of common
stock. These warrants expire on January 31, 2000, and have an exercise price
of $.02 per share. As of March 31, 1999 and September 30, 1999, 490,460 and
330,160 warrants are exercisable and outstanding, respectively. The fair value
of these warrants, as determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
was not significant to the accompanying financial statements.
In connection with the issuance of Series B convertible preferred stock in
1997, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,227,697 shares of Series B
convertible preferred stock. The warrants expire on August 26, 2001, and have
an exercise price of $.6109 per share. As of September 30, 1999, 1,145,128
Series B convertible preferred stock warrants are exercisable and outstanding.
The fair value of these warrants, as determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model, was not significant to the accompanying financial statements.
In connection with a bridge loan issued in fiscal 1998, the Company issued
warrants to purchase 110,000 shares of Series C preferred stock with an
exercise price of $.75 per share. These warrants are exercisable upon
issuance. The Company has recorded the fair value of these warrants of
$62,589, determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as an
increase to paid-in capital and as a loan discount. The loan discount was
amortized over the term of the bridge loan.
(c) Option Plan
The Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan (the Plan) provides for "incentive"
stock options, defined by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the
Code), to be granted to employees, at an exercise price not less than 100% of
the fair value, at the grant date, as determined by the Board of Directors.
The Plan also provides for "nonqualified" stock options, at an exercise price
of not less than 85% of the fair value at the grant date, to be issued to
nonemployee officers, directors, and consultants. Options generally have a
term of 10 years and vest over a period of 48 months.
(d) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to use the intrinsic value-based method to account
for the Plan. Under APB Opinion No. 25, the Company has recorded no
compensation costs related to its stock option plan since
F-38
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
inception, because the exercise price of each option granted has equaled or
exceeded the fair value of the underlying common stock as of the grant date
for each stock option. With respect to the options granted between April 1,
1999 and September 30, 1999, the Company recorded deferred stock compensation
of $471,900 for the difference, at the grant date, between the exercise price
of each stock option granted and the fair value of the underlying common
stock. This amount is being amortized over the vesting period, generally four
years.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the Company is required to disclose the pro forma
effect on net loss as if the Company had elected to use the fair value method
to account for the Plan. Had compensation cost for the Plan been determined
consistent with the fair value method described in SFAS No. 123, the Company's
pro forma net loss for the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the
six month ended September 30, 1999 would have increased by $8,000, $1,000 and
$50,000, respectively, from the respective net loss amounts reported in the
accompanying statements of operations.
The fair value of options granted was estimated on the date of grant using
the minimum value method with the following weighted-average assumptions:
risk-free interest rate of approximately 5.5%; expected life of five years;
and no dividends.
A summary of the status of the Plan is presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options
Outstanding
-------------------
Weighted
Options Average
Available Exercise
for Grant Shares Price
---------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balances as of March 31, 1997.............. 637,333 1,262,667 $.05
Granted.................................. (292,000) 292,000 .07
Exercised................................ -- (56,250) .04
Canceled................................. 127,250 (127,250) .07
---------- ---------
Balances as of March 31, 1998.............. 472,583 1,371,167 .05
Authorized............................... 1,000,000 -- --
Granted.................................. (1,657,875) 1,657,875 .10
Exercised................................ -- (561,061) .04
Canceled................................. 731,731 (731,731) .08
---------- ---------
Balances as of March 31, 1999.............. 546,439 1,736,250 .09
Granted.................................. (246,000) 246,000 .10
Exercised................................ -- (84,250) .06
Canceled................................. 216,500 (216,500) .10
---------- ---------
Balances as of September 30, 1999.......... 516,939 1,681,500 .09
========== =========
Options exercisable as of March 31, 1999... 263,875 .06
Options exercisable as of September 30,
1999...................................... 420,742 .07
=========
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted during the year/period ended:
March 31, 1998........................... .02
March 31, 1999........................... .03
September 30, 1999....................... 1.89
</TABLE>
F-39
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
as of March 31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options outstanding
---------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Number Remaining Contractual Options
Exercise Price Outstanding Life (Years) Exercisable
-------------- ----------- --------------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
$.02........................... 125,000 6.95 81,875
.07........................... 284,000 8.10 166,625
.10........................... 1,327,250 9.52 15,375
--------- -------
1,736,250 263,875
========= =======
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
as of September 30, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding
---------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Number Remaining Contractual Options
Exercise Price Outstanding Life (Years) Exercisable
-------------- ----------- --------------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
$.02........................... 70,100 6.70 49,070
.07........................... 244,000 7.64 154,500
.10........................... 1,367,400 9.20 217,172
--------- -------
1,681,500 420,742
========= =======
</TABLE>
7--Income Taxes
The differences between the income tax expense computed at the federal
statutory rate and the Company's the Company's tax provision for all periods
presented primarily related to net operating losses not benefited.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the deferred tax assets presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of As of March 31,
September 30, ----------------------
1999 1999 1998
------------- ---------- ----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards.... $5,876,000 $4,233,000 $2,211,000
Research credit carryforwards....... 475,000 341,000 63,000
Reserves and accruals............... 46,000 8,000 25,000
Fixed assets........................ -- -- 2,000
---------- ---------- ----------
Total gross deferred tax assets... 6,397,000 4,582,000 2,301,000
Valuation allowance................... (6,001,000) (4,266,000) (2,135,000)
Deferred tax liability:
State tax........................... (370,000) (282,000) (166,000)
Fixed assets........................ (26,000) (34,000) --
---------- ---------- ----------
Total deferred tax liabilities.... (396,000) (316,000) (166,000)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net deferred tax assets........... $ -- $ -- $ --
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
F-40
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
In light of the Company's recent history of operating losses, the Company
has provided a valuation allowance for all of its deferred tax assets as it is
presently unable to conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred
tax assets will be realized.
As of September 30, 1999, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards
for federal and California income tax purposes of approximately $14,700,000
and $9,931,000, respectively. In addition, the Company had federal and
California research and development credit carryforwards of approximately
$269,000 and $206,000, respectively. The Company's federal net operating loss
and research and development credit carryforwards will expire in the years
2011 through 2019, if not utilized. The Company's California net operating
loss carryforwards will expire in the year 2004. The California research and
development credit can be carried forward indefinitely.
Federal and California tax laws impose substantial restrictions on the
utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in the event of
an "ownership change" as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 382. If the
Company has an ownership change, the Company's ability to utilize the above
mentioned carryforwards could be significantly reduced.
8--Research and Development Arrangement
In November 1996, the Company signed an agreement with the Defense Advanced
Research Project Agency (DARPA) for the development of an on-line procurement
system for electronic components. The contract represents a cost-reimbursement
arrangement whereby DARPA will reimburse the Company for allowable research
and development costs. Total development costs under the arrangement were
approximately $6,800,000 with allowable reimbursed expenses approximating
$3,000,000. Costs reimbursed in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 and recognized as
revenue in the accompanying statements of operations were $850,032, $1,600,000
and $550,000 respectively. Costs incurred by the Company, under this
arrangement are included in research and development costs.
The agreement was terminated in July 1999. Subsequent to March 31, 1999, no
revenue was recognized or costs incurred, under this arrangement.
9--Segment Information
The Company has one operating segment. The Company's chief operating
decision maker, the president and chief executive officer, evaluates
performance, makes operating decisions and allocates resources based on
financial data consistent with the presentation in the accompanying financial
statements. All operations and assets are within the United States of America.
10--Lease Commitments
The Company leases certain facilities and office equipment under
noncancelable operating leases. Rent expense for the years ended March 31,
1999 and 1998, and for the six month periods ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
was approximately $204,000, $112,000, $101,771, and $92,677, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ending
March 31,
-----------
<S> <C>
2000............................................................. $180,800
2001............................................................. 60,800
--------
Future minimum lease payments..................................... $241,600
========
</TABLE>
F-41
<PAGE>
DIGITAL MARKET, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
March 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and Six Months Ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
(unaudited)
11--Subsequent Event
On October 10, 1999, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization with Agile Software Corporation. The acquisition of the Company
closed on November 23, 1999. Agile's common stock is publicly traded and is
listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol AGIL. The Company has
merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agile. Subject to certain
escrow and indemnity provisions contained in the Agreement, each shareholder
of the Company received his pro rata portion of (i) $20,000,000 in cash and
(ii) Agile common stock with an aggregate value of $79,200,000. In addition,
all outstanding warrants to purchase capital stock of the Company have been
canceled immediately prior to the merger in exchange for an amount of cash and
a number of shares of Agile common stock equal to the amount of cash and stock
such holder otherwise would have been entitled to receive had such holder
exercised his warrants on a net exercise basis immediately prior to Merger.
All outstanding options of the Company have been assumed by Agile.
A lawsuit was filed against the Company by PolyDyne Development Corporation
(PolyDyne) on July 13, 1999, in Travis County, Texas. This lawsuit is now
pending in Federal District Court. In this lawsuit, Polydyne seeks affirmative
relief against the Company arising from an alleged misappropriation of trade
secrets by the Company.
After consideration of the nature of the claims, the Company does not
believe that resolution of the lawsuit will harm their business. However, due
to the inherently uncertain nature of the litigation, the Company cannot
determine the possible loss, if any, that they may ultimately incur either in
the context of the trial or as a result of a negotiated settlement. The
defense of the litigation, regardless of the outcome, could result in the
expenditure of significant financial and management resources of the Company.
F-42
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF AGILE SOFTWARE APPEARS HERE]
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than
underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by Agile, in connection with
this offering. All amounts shown are estimates except for the registration fee
and the NASD filing fee.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
SEC registration fee............................................. $119,521
NASD filing fee.................................................. 34,784
Nasdaq National Market listing fee............................... 17,500
Blue sky fees and expenses....................................... 10,000
Printing and engraving expenses.................................. 100,000
Legal fees and expenses.......................................... 100,000
Accounting fees and expenses..................................... 250,000
Miscellaneous expenses........................................... 68,195
--------
Total.......................................................... $700,000
========
</TABLE>
Item 14. Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to
award, or a corporation's board of directors to grant, indemnity to officers,
directors and other corporate agents under certain circumstances and subject
to certain limitations. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide
that we shall indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents to the
full extent permitted by Delaware General Corporation Law, including in
circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary under
Delaware law. In addition, we intend to enter into separate indemnification
agreements with our directors, officers and certain employees which would
require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities
which may arise by reason of their status as directors, officers or certain
other employees. We also intend to maintain director and officer liability
insurance, if available on reasonable terms.
These indemnification provisions and the indemnification agreements that we
have entered into with our officers and directors may be sufficiently broad to
permit indemnification of our officers and directors for liabilities
(including reimbursement of expenses incurred) arising under the Securities
Act.
We have a policy of directors' and officers' liability insurance that
insures our directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or
payment of a judgment under certain circumstances.
The form of Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
Registration Statement provides for indemnification by the underwriters of
Agile and our officers and directors for certain liabilities arising under the
Securities Act, or otherwise.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
(a) Since May 1, 1996, we have sold and issued the following unregistered
securities:
(1) From inception to October 31, 1999, we issued options to purchase an
aggregate of 4,692,950 shares of common stock under the 1995 Stock Option
Plan at exercise prices of $.015 to $65.50 per share, of which options to
purchase 2,582,813 shares have been exercised, options to purchase 443,369
have been cancelled or repurchased, and options to purchase 1,834,525 are
available for grant.
II-1
<PAGE>
(2) From inception to April 30, 1999, we issued options to purchase an
aggregate of 183,500 shares of common stock under our Restricted Stock
Purchase Plan at exercise prices of $.60 to $2.65 per share, of which
options to purchase 183,500 shares have been exercised.
(3) On January 16, 1996, we issued and sold 3,500,000 shares of Series C
Preferred Stock to 5 private investors at a price of $1.16 per share for a
total offering of $4,060,000.
(4) On October 31, 1996, we issued and sold 75,000 shares of Series C
Preferred Stock to one private investor at a price of $1.16 per share for a
total price of $87,000.
(5) On February 16, 1997, in connection with an equipment lease, we
issued a warrant to an equipment lessor to purchase 17,828 shares of Series
D preferred stock at an exercise price of $2.964 per share.
(6) On February 16, 1997, we issued and sold an aggregate of 1,350,000
shares of Series D Preferred Stock to 10 private investors at a price of
$2.964 per share for a total offering price of $4,001,400.
(7) On May 1, 1997, we issued 6,750 shares of Common Stock to our Chief
Executive Officer as a bonus in lieu of cash.
(8) On November 14, 1997, we issued and sold an aggregate of 1,000,000
shares of Series E Preferred Stock to 14 private investors at a price of
$5.00 per share for a total offering price of $5,000,000.
(9) On November 14, 1997, in connection with an equipment lease, we
issued a warrant to an equipment lessor to purchase 4,049 shares of Series
D preferred stock at an exercise price of $2.964 per share.
(10) On June 4, 1998, we issued and sold an aggregate of 1,777,778
shares of Series F Preferred Stock to 24 private investors at a price of
$6.75 per share for a total offering price of $12,000,001.50.
(11) On February 8, 1999, in connection with an equipment lease, we
issued a warrant to an equipment lessor to purchase an aggregate of 60,000
shares of Series F preferred stock at an exercise price of $6.75 per share.
(12) On August 23, 1999, we sold 256,016 shares of common stock to Dell
Computer Corporation, 256,016 shares of common stock to Flextronics
International Ltd. and 153,609 shares of common stock to Marshall
Industries, concurrently with our initial public offering, at $13.02 per
share.
(13) On November 23, 1999, we issued 611,765 shares of common stock to
the holders of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock and warrants
of Digital Market, Inc., in connection with the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated as of October 10, 1999 by and between Agile, Alaska
Acquisition Corporation and Digital Market. In addition, we assumed all
outstanding options of Digital Market and converted them into options to
purchase 10,758 shares of our common stock.
There were no underwriters employed in connection with any of the
transactions set forth in Item 15.
For additional information concerning these equity investment transactions,
please see the section entitled "Certain Transactions" in the prospectus.
The issuances described in Items 15(a)(3) through 15(a)(6) and 15(a)(8)
through 15(a)(12) were deemed exempt from registration under the Securities
Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an
issuer not involving a public offering. The issuance of securities described
in Item 15(a)(13) was deemed to be exempt from registration under the
Securities Act in reliance on Section 3(a)(10) as a transaction involving a
security which is issued in exchange for a security where the terms and
conditions of such securities are approved after a hearing on the fairness of
such terms and conditions. Certain issuances described in Item 15(a)(1),
15(a)(2) and 15(a)(7) were deemed exempt from registration under the
Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) or Rule 701 promulgated thereunder
as transactions pursuant to compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating
to compensation. The recipients of securities in each such transaction
represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and
not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and
appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates and other
instruments issued in such transactions. All recipients either received
adequate information about us or had access, through employment or other
relationships, to such information.
II-2
<PAGE>
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description of Document
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
1.1* Form of Underwriting Agreement.
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 17, 1999 by and
between Agile Software Corporation and Delaware Agile Software
Corporation.(2)
2.2* Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October 10, 1999,
by and between Agile Software Corporation, Alaska Acquisition
Corporation and Digital Market, Inc.
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Agile Software Corporation, as
amended to date.(1)
3.2 Certificate of Elimination and Certificate of Amendment.(1)
3.3 Bylaws of Agile Software Corporation.(1)
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(1)
5.1* Opinion of Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP.
10.1 Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan.(1)
10.2 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.(1)
10.3 Form of Indemnity Agreement between Agile Software Corporation and
its directors and officers.(1)
10.4 Almaden Financial Plaza Office Lease dated May 30, 1996 between
North Block Partnership and Agile Software Corporation, as
amended.(1)
10.5 Subordinated Loan and Security Agreement dated February 8, 1999
between Comdisco, Inc. and Agile Software Corporation.(1)
10.6 Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement (Accounts and
Inventory) dated December 11, 1996 between Comerica Bank--
California and Agile Software Corporation as modified.(1)
10.7 Master Lease Agreement dated September 18, 1995 between Comdisco,
Inc. and Agile Software Corporation, and associated equipment
schedules.(1)
10.8 Fifth Amended and Restated Investors' Rights Agreement dated June 4,
1998 by and among Agile Software Corporation and the investors
listed on Schedule A thereto.(1)
10.9 Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.10 Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.11 Series C Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.12 Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.13 Series E Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.14 Series F Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.15 Sixth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as August
16, 1999 by and among Agile Software Corporation and the investors
listed on Schedule A thereto.(2)
10.16* Office Lease dated as of November 5, 1999 by and between 55 Almaden
Boulevard Limited Partnership and Agile Software Corporation.
21.1* Subsidiaries of Agile Software Corporation.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.
23.2 Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Accountants.
23.3* Consent of Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP (included in Exhibit
5.1).
24.1* Power of Attorney.
27.1* Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR filed version only).
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Incorporated by reference herein to Agile's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-81387).
(2) Incorporated by reference herein to Agile's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 31, 1999.
* Previously filed.
II-3
<PAGE>
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because the information
required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
Item 17. Undertakings
We hereby undertake to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified
in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and
registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification by us for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling
persons pursuant to the provisions described in Item 14 above or otherwise, we
have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim
for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of
expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of
ours in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted
by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed
by the final adjudication of such issue.
We hereby undertake that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
the information omitted from the form of Prospectus filed as part of this
Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form
of prospectus filed by us pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under
the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration
Statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at the time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, Agile has duly
caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of San Jose, State of California, on the 10th day
of December, 1999.
Agile Software Corporation
/s/ Bryan D. Stolle
By: _________________________________
Bryan D. Stolle
Chief Executive Officer and
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this amendment
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Bryan D. Stolle Chief Executive Officer, December 10, 1999
____________________________________ President and Director
Bryan D. Stolle (Principal Executive
Officer)
/s/ Thomas P. Shanahan Chief Financial Officer, December 10, 1999
____________________________________ Secretary and Director
Thomas P. Shanahan (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
* Director December 10, 1999
____________________________________
Michael Moritz
* Director December 10, 1999
____________________________________
James L. Patterson
* Director December 10, 1999
____________________________________
Nancy J. Schoendorf
</TABLE>
/s/ Thomas P. Shanahan
*By:____________________________
Thomas P. Shanahan
Attorney-in-fact
II-5
<PAGE>
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description of Document
------- -----------------------
<C> <S>
1.1* Form of Underwriting Agreement.
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 17, 1999 by and
between Agile Software Corporation and Delaware Agile Software
Corporation.(2)
2.2* Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October 10, 1999, by
and between Agile Software Corporation, Alaska Acquisition
Corporation and Digital Market, Inc.
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Agile Software Corporation, as amended
to date.(1)
3.2 Form of Certificate of Elimination and Certificate of Amendment.(1)
3.3 Bylaws of Agile Software Corporation.(1)
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(1)
5.1* Opinion of Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP.
10.1 Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan.(1)
10.2 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.(1)
10.3 Form of Indemnity Agreement between Agile Software Corporation and its
directors and officers.(1)
10.4 Almaden Financial Plaza Office Lease dated May 30, 1996 between North
Block Partnership and Agile Software Corporation, as amended.(1)
10.5 Subordinated Loan and Security Agreement dated February 8, 1999
between Comdisco, Inc. and Agile Software Corporation.(1)
10.6 Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement (Accounts and Inventory)
dated December 11, 1996 between Comerica Bank--California and Agile
Software Corporation as modified.(1)
10.7 Master Lease Agreement dated September 18, 1995 between Comdisco, Inc.
and Agile Software Corporation, and associated equipment
schedules.(1)
10.8 Fifth Amended and Restated Investors' Rights Agreement dated June 4,
1998 by and among Agile Software Corporation and the investors listed
on Schedule A thereto.(1)
10.9 Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.10 Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.11 Series C Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.12 Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.13 Series E Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.14 Series F Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.(1)
10.15 Sixth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as August
16, 1999 by and among Agile Software Corporation and the investors
listed on Schedule A thereto.(2)
10.16* Office Lease dated as of November 5, 1999 by and between 55 Almaden
Boulevard Limited Partnership and Agile Software Corporation.
21.1* Subsidiaries of Agile Software Corporation.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.
23.2 Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Accountants.
23.3* Consent of Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
24.1* Power of Attorney.
27.1* Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR filed version only).
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Incorporated by reference herein to Agile's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-8137)
(2) Incorporated by reference herein to Agile's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended July 31, 1999.
* Previously filed.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
our report dated May 28, 1999, except for Note 8, which is as of August 16,
1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Agile Software
Corporation, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
December 9, 1999
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Agile Software Corporation
We consent to the inclusion in the registration statement on Form S-1 of
Agile Software Corporation, of our report dated June 18, 1999, except as to
Note 11, which is as of October 10, 1999, on the financial statements of
Digital Market, Inc. as of March 31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999.
Our report dated June 18, 1999, except as to Note 11, which is as of
October 10, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since inception and has
an accumulated deficit, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.
We also consent to the reference of our firm under the heading "Experts" in
the Prospectus.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
December 9, 1999
