ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORP
SC 14D1/A, 1995-08-03
HOUSEHOLD AUDIO & VIDEO EQUIPMENT
Previous: XTRA INC, 424B5, 1995-08-03
Next: OXIS INTERNATIONAL INC, 8-K, 1995-08-03



<PAGE>
                   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
                         WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                            SCHEDULE 14D-1/A

               TENDER OFFER STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 
            14(D)(1) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

                                   AND

                             SCHEDULE 13D/A

                    UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934


                     ZENITH ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
                        (NAME OF SUBJECT COMPANY)


                           LG ELECTRONICS INC.
                                (BIDDER)


Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share (Including the Associated Rights)
                     (TITLE OF CLASS OF SECURITIES)


                               989349 10 5
                  (CUSIP NUMBER OF CLASS OF SECURITIES)

                                K.S. Cho
                            Managing Director
                           LG Electronics Inc.
                             LG Twin Towers
                             20, Yoido-dong
                             Youngdungpo-gu
                          Seoul, Korea 150-721
                           011-82-2-3777-3480

              (NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON
          AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS ON 
                            BEHALF OF BIDDER)

                                Copy to:
                             Scott J. Davis
                          Mayer, Brown & Platt
                        190 South LaSalle Street
                           Chicago, IL  60603
                             (312) 782-0600
<PAGE>
      This Amendment No. 1 amends and supplements the Tender Offer 
Statement on Schedule 14D-1 and Schedule 13D dated July 21, 1995 (the 
"Schedule 14D-1") of LG Electronics Inc., a corporation organized under the 
laws of the Republic of Korea (the "Purchaser"), filed in connection with 
the Purchaser's offer to purchase up to 18,619,000 shares of the 
outstanding common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Common Stock"), 
of Zenith Electronics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), 
and the associated Common Stock purchase rights (the "Rights" and, together 
with the Common Stock, the "Shares") upon the terms and subject to the 
conditions set forth in the Schedule 14D-1.  Capitalized terms used but not 
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to those terms in 
the Schedule 14D-1.


 
ITEM 10.   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

      E.   On July 18, 1995, a purported stockholder class action suit was 
filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New 
Castle County against the Company, the members of the board of directors of 
the Company and the Purchaser (Horwits v. Zenith Electronics Corporation, 
et al., C.A. No. 14424).  On July 27, 1995, the plaintiff filed an amended 
complaint (as so amended, the "Complaint").  The Complaint alleges that the 
Company's directors breached their fiduciary duties and failed to exercise 
loyalty, good faith, due care and complete disclosure toward the Company 
and the stockholders of the Company in connection (i) with the Company's 
1995 annual meeting and (ii) the subsequent proposal by the Purchaser to 
acquire a controlling interest in the Company pursuant to the Offer and the 
purchase of the Issue Shares (collectively, the "Transaction").  

<PAGE>
      The Complaint alleges that the Company's proxy statement for its 1995 
annual meeting failed to disclose (i) discussions regarding a possible 
change of control transaction, (ii) the Company's retention of Merrill 
Lynch, (iii) the halting of a proposed public equity offering in April, 
1995 and (iv) the amendment of agreements providing certain "change in 
control" benefits to certain Zenith executives.  In addition, the Complaint 
alleges that, in executing the Stock Purchase Agreement and recommending 
that stockholders approve the Transaction, the Company's directors failed 
to adequately explore the availability of alternatives to maximize 
stockholder value or otherwise conduct a process to obtain the highest 
value reasonably available to stockholders in a sale of control.  The 
Complaint also alleges that the Company's Solicitation/Recommendation 
Statement on Schedule 14D-9, dated July 21, 1995 (the "Schedule 14D-9") 
fails to disclose (i) material facts relating to Merrill Lynch's fairness 
opinion, (ii) the factual basis or rationale for the Company's management 
and financial advisors' views as to the unlikelihood of a superior 
transaction, (iii) the factual basis for the Company's board of directors' 
conclusion that alternative financing of a similar magnitude was not 
reasonably available and (iv) the basis for the Company's board of 
directors' apparent rejection of the Purchaser's June 27, 1995 joint 
venture proposal in favor of a sale of control.  The Complaint alleges that 
the Purchaser's Schedule 14D-1 and the Company's Schedule 14D-9 fail to 
disclose (i) a schedule of "change of control" payments required to be 
made, stock options which vest and restricted Shares which vest in 
connection with the transaction, (ii) the structure, terms or timing of any 
proposals from the Purchaser prior to the two alternative proposals 
presented by the Purchaser on June 27, 1995, (iii) the terms and structure 
of the joint venture proposal made by the Purchaser on June 27, 1995, (iv) 
the structure, terms or timing of the proposed transaction or 
counter-proposal of the Other Consumer Products Entity or whether the 
counter-proposal was affirmatively rejected by the Other Consumer Products 
Entity and (v) the specific dates of certain developments regarding the 
Other Consumer Products Entity.  The Complaint further alleges that the 
Purchaser aided and abetted the Company's directors' alleged breach of 
their fiduciary duties.  The Complaint seeks (i) a declaration that the 
action may be maintained as a class action, (ii) a declaration that the 
Transaction is unfair, unjust and inequitable, (iii) invalidation of the 
stockholder vote, including the election of directors, at the Company's 
1995 annual meeting, (iv) invalidation of the Stock Purchase Agreement, (v) 
an order compelling the Company's directors to conduct a proper process to 
explore the availability of alternatives to maximize stockholder value and 
to disseminate completely all material information relating to the 
Transaction, (vi) to enjoin further steps necessary to accomplish or 
implement the proposed Transaction, (vii) to compensate the plaintiff and 
members of the class for all losses and damages allegedly suffered and to 
be suffered by them and (viii) to award plaintiff costs, including 
reasonable attorneys', accountants' and experts' fees.  The Company and the 
Purchaser believe that the Complaint is without merit and intend to 
vigorously defend against the alleged claims.

<PAGE>

                                SIGNATURE

      After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I 
certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete 
and correct.



Dated:  August 3, 1995


                             LG ELECTRONICS INC.


                             /s/ K.S. Cho                               
                             Name:  K.S. Cho 
                             Title:  Managing Director



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission