<PAGE>
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB/A
[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-27821
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-INFINITY.COM,INC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4828 LOOP CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE 150 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77081
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (713) 838-8853
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None.
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE
(Title of class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
Issuer's revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 were
$257,316.
As of June 1, 2000, the aggregate market value of the registrant's
common stock (based on the closing sales price for the common stock as reported
on the OTC Bulletin Board on such date) held by non-affiliates of the registrant
was approximately $33,062,758. (Aggregate market value has been estimated solely
for the purpose of this report. For the purpose of this report it has been
assumed that all officers and directors are affiliates of the registrant. The
statements made herein shall not be construed as an admission for the purposes
of determining the affiliate status of any person.) As of June 1, 2000, the
registrant had 87,266,339 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes No X
--- ---
Documents incorporated by reference:
None.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
PART I.............................................................................3
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS..........................................3
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY..........................................9
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS...............................................10
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.............10
PART II...........................................................................10
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS........10
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.......13
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS............................................15
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE..........................16
PART III..........................................................................16
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS...............................16
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.........................................16
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT..........................................18
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ................18
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K .............................19
SIGNATURES........................................................................22
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In accordance with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company notes that certain
statements in this Form 10-KSB/A and elsewhere which are forward-looking and
which provide other than historical information, involve risks and uncertainties
that may impact the Company's results of operations. These forward-looking
statements include, among others, statements concerning the Company's general
business strategies, financing decisions, and expectations for funding capital
expenditures and operations in the future. When used herein, the words
"believe," "plan," "continue," "hope," "estimate," "project," "intend,"
"expect," and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, no statements
contained in this Form 10-KSB/A should be relied upon as predictions of future
events. Such statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or
methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and may be incapable of being
realized. The risks and uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking
statements could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in or implied by these statements.
Important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statement
herein include among other things: (1) the ability of the Company to quickly
penetrate the market with its current method of technology against larger,
well-financed competitors within the marketplace; (2) the ability of the Company
to generate revenues is substantially dependent upon continued growth in the use
of the Internet and the infrastructure for providing Internet access and
carrying Internet traffic; (3) the ability of the Company to attract and retain
key officers, knowledgeable sales and marketing personnel and highly trained
technical personnel; (4) to the extent that our activities or third-party
contractors involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information,
such as credit card numbers, or personal data information, the ability of the
Company to reduce exposure to a risk of loss or litigation and possible
liability; (5) the ability of the Company to minimize expenses and exposures
related to oil and gas properties in which other Companies have control over the
manner in which operations are conducted on such properties, including
compliance with safety and environmental standards; (6) the ability of the
Company to obtain additional financing from public and private equity markets to
fund operations and future growth; and (7) the ability of the Company to
generate revenues to cover operating losses and position the Company to achieve
positive cash flow.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date
hereof. The information contained in this Form 10-KSB/A is believed by the
Company to be accurate as of the date hereof. Changes may occur after that date,
and the Company will not update that information except as required by law in
the normal course of its public disclosure practices.
THE COMPANY OVERVIEW
The Company, through the operations of it's wholly owned subsidiaries,
has diversified into two very distinct business sectors. The primary business is
involved in the technology sectors of Internet access and voice and data product
sales and services. The secondary business, which the Company has been involved
in since 1995, is oil and gas exploration and operations.
In May and June 1999, the Company acquired two entities that provided
the entrance into the technology sector. The Company's subsidiary,
2-Infinity.com, Inc., a Texas corporation ("2-Infinity-Texas") is a provider of
digital bundled services to the commercial and residential market. Current
services include digital subscriber line (DSL), voice over Internet protocol
(voIP), virtual private networking (VPN) and real private networking (RPN).
Digital cable and RPN are projected for release in the 3rd quarter of 2000. A
predecessor business that has
3
<PAGE>
been merged into 2-Infinity-Texas, AirNexus, Inc., is a retail provider of
commercial voice and data products and services with an emphasis on LAN based
telephony solutions.
2-Infinity-Texas, as a result of this merger, now possesses a direct
sales force to market digital bundled services to commercial building tenants.
2-Infinity-Texas and AirNexus merged on January 27, 2000 and formed the "2-I
Voice Solutions" division to continue the business formerly conducted by
AirNexus.
The Company's subsidiary, Lakota Oil and Gas, Inc., has historically
invested in oil and gas exploration projects with joint partners.
HISTORICAL BUSINESS AND EVOLUTION OF THE BUSINESS STRATEGY
On November 14, 1995, Lakota Energy, Inc. ("Lakota Energy") was formed
in the State of Colorado for the purpose of engaging in oil and gas exploration
and operations. On November 6, 1996, Lakota Energy was merged with and into
Chancellor Trading Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation. As part of the merger
agreement, Chancellor issued 9,187,500 shares to the shareholders of Lakota
Energy in exchange for 4,593,750 shares of Lakota Energy common stock and an
additional 118,000 shares were issued to third parties who assisted in closing
the transaction. Chancellor was a publicly traded corporation and had no
significant operations prior to the merger with the Company. Immediately
following the merger, the shareholders of Chancellor approved the name change to
Lakota Energy, Inc.
Historically, the strategic plan of the Company was to participate in
oil and gas exploration projects that have been developed by other successful,
well-financed companies. The Company narrowed its interest to projects in
certain confined geological areas, primarily in Texas and Louisiana, since they
were able to work with consultants that were familiar with the nuances of these
geological provinces. However, as a result of continued losses from these
ventures, the Company decided to diversify into other businesses, primarily
technology and the Internet.
On August 4, 1999, the Company changed its name to Lakota Technologies,
Inc. to further promote its new diversified strategies.
On May 28, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of
2-Infinity-Texas. As consideration for the acquisition, the Company issued
3,000,000 shares of its common stock to Majed Jalali, the sole shareholder of
2-Infinity-Texas. The acquisition of 2-Infinity-Texas triggered the beginning of
the Company's desire to diversify into the technology and Internet markets.
2-Infinity-Texas offers digital bundled services, focusing on the Texas market
during the next 12 months, and with plans to expand into four additional markets
in the near future.
On June 8, 1999, the Company acquired Voice Design, Inc., a Texas
corporation which later changed its name to AirNexus, Inc. ("AirNexus"). As
consideration for the acquisition, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its
common stock and $60,000 cash to the owners of AirNexus. This acquisition of a
Houston-based provider of business telephone and voice mail systems furthered
the business strategy to diversify into technology and Internet markets. The
Company also resells equipment manufactured by third parties, such as 3Com,
Panasonic and Estech Systems, Inc. through its 2-I Voice Solutions division.
Currently, 2-I Voice Solutions has approximately 130 customers.
On June 9, 1999, the Company organized a wholly owned Texas corporation
named Lakota Oil and Gas, Inc. ("Lakota Oil"). Subsequently, on June 14, 1999,
the Company transferred its interest in two oil exploration projects, which
constituted all of the Company's oil and gas related assets at the time, to
Lakota Oil. The purpose of forming Lakota Oil was to organize the oil and gas
related business into one operating subsidiary, separate and distinct from the
other operating subsidiaries, in order to more accurately reflect the
diversified operations.
On January 18, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with
shareholders of AGM, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("AGM"), pursuant to which the
Company issued 2,200,000 shares of common stock to acquire 100% of AGM. The
Company acquired AGM in order to become a reporting company with the SEC. As
part of the acquisition, the
4
<PAGE>
Company elected to have successor issuer status under Rule 12g-3 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in order to be a SEC reporting entity.
On January 27, 2000, AirNexus and 2-Infinity-Texas merged, with
2-Infinity being the surviving corporation. Although the merger is expected to
result in reduced overhead expenses, it is not expected to have a material
effect on operations. The voice and data products and services originally sold
by AirNexus now constitute the company's 2-I Voice Solutions division.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW.
The DSL industry is still in its infancy. Industry analysts estimate
that there are less than 1 million DSL subscribers nationwide. Projections
estimate an approximate 180 percent growth rate by the end of year 2000. The
recent Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the demand for a cost-effective
solution for high-speed dedicated access have spawned a new bread of Competitive
Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs). These new facility-based providers known as
data CLECs are leveraging DSL to obtain market share and increase margins.
Companies such as Covad, Rhythms and Northpoint have deployed DSL networks in
more than 25 major US cities. As a result, traditional local Internet service
providers have forged agreements to resell DSL services in an attempt to
increase margins and curtail the high rate of churn amongst existing dial-up
customers.
We anticipate the market for new DSL technologies will increase. The
Company believes the amount of data business and residential customers pass
across the Internet will be a major growth factor. Another is the recent surge
in telecommuters who demand broadband access to support desktop voice, data and
video applications. An effect of the 1996 Telecommunications Act has been an
increase of companies ready to deliver services to this market. Incumbent local
exchange carriers (ILECs), interexchange carriers (IXCs), Internet service
providers (ISPs), CLECs, and satellite and cable companies have restructured to
meet the demand. The need for affordable broadband transmission rates, and a
competitive telecom service environment all contribute to making DSL attractive.
DSL will dramatically increase the speed of copper wire-based transmission
systems without a major overhaul to the existing telephone infrastructure. New
DSL services are in the process of development that will require lower capital
requirements and generate a higher return on investment.
The recent trend of converging voice and data is reshaping the telecom
industry. National and local telephone equipment resellers have seen the demand
for integrated systems continue to grow. Traditional voice solution providers
have been slow to incorporate the newer technology into their product lines.
Data value added resellers (VARs) and network integrators have historically
remained isolated from voice services. With the introduction of Voice over IP
and Computer Telephony, network integrators have been drawn into the demand to
provide integrated applications. Today's voice solution providers are required
to be versed in network topology and telephone application programming interface
(TAPI).
Tomorrow's business phone systems will integrate with PCs and networks
and provide the highest level of integration between voice and data.
Manufacturers such as 3COM, Cisco, Nortel and AT&T have already unveiled their
versions of integrated solutions. Today's businesses have the ability to route
voice traffic across multiple broadband technologies. The corporate intranet
must be robust enough to support the bandwidth requirements of integrated
business phone systems.
The demand for LAN based business phone systems will continue to
generate phenomenal growth in the telecom industry. Resellers are now able to
offer organizations with multiple locations a true voice and data intranet for a
minimum monthly expense. As the cost of expensive leased network lines continues
to drop, small businesses are able to take advantage of technology and compete
at higher levels.
5
<PAGE>
THE MARKET
High Speed Internet Access
2-Infinity-Texas has entered into a Channel Partners Agreement with Tut
Systems, Inc.("Tut"), which gives us the non-exclusive right to sell Tut's
products. Under the terms of that agreement, 2-Infinity-Texas has the right to
purchase Tut's products at prices according to regularly published price lists
from Tut Systems and re-sell them to their customers. There are no limits on the
re-sale prices 2-Infinity-Texas can charge on the products. The agreement is
automatically renewed for successive one year terms, but can be terminated by
either party on 90 days notice or by Tut Systems if 2-Infinity-Texas fails to
purchase a minimum of $1,000,000 in products per year.
Tut's is in the business of delivering plug-and-play network solutions
across standard telephone lines. Tut's products deliver high-speed data over
normal telephone wires using their FastCopper -TM- technology. Tut's products
are easy to install and use, providing customers with a dedicated connection 24
hours a day, while still allowing full use of the telephone line for voice use.
More importantly, Tut's products require no additional wiring or modifications
to the telephone lines. Through the Channel Partners Agreement, 2-Infinity can
offer its clients Tut's-enhanced Internet access at what we believe to be a very
reasonable price.
2-Infinity-Texas will market the Tut's products through existing
contacts and personal introductions, and is seeking to enter into agreements
with the owners and managers of multi-dwelling units, such as commercial
properties, apartment complexes, hotels, high rise apartment buildings, and
residential developers to become the Internet service provider for the entire
developments.
2-Infinity-Texas offers its digital bundled services in two different
packages. The first option allows the subscriber to rent equipment monthly on a
low cost-per-unit basis. The second option allows the subscriber to purchase the
equipment. In addition to the basic high speed Internet access, subscribers can
purchase services including:
-- Local dial tone
-- Voice over IP
-- Creation of web sites
Voice and Data Products and Services
2-I Voice Solutions continues to market the 3COM NBX 100 LAN based
business phone system. INTERNET TELEPHONY magazine deemed the NBX 100
communications system one of the "Products of the Year." In November 11, 1999,
PC MAGAZINE awarded the NBX 100 communications system with the "1999 Technical
Excellence Award." Because the NBX 100 uses standard network cabling to support
voice traffic, it affords businesses the ability to consolidate voice, video and
data on one single cable. We believe the NBX 100 communications system permits
computers, telephone networks and the Internet to be integrated in a more
functional manner.
Under the terms of an agreement between 3COM and the Company, the
Company has the non-exclusive rights to license and distribute specific 3COM
products in Houston, Texas and surrounding areas. 3COM may terminate the
agreement under certain circumstances, including after our breach of the
agreement or our failure to purchase a minimum of $200,000 of product per year.
The target market for 2-I Voice Solutions are businesses between 20-100
employees. This sector of the market typically does not have a systems manager
or network administrator on staff and requires outsourcing of the expertise to
maintain these services. A high percentage of these companies have a network in
place and are receptive to new advancements and technology. We intend to provide
this sector with a convenient and easily acceptable avenue to outsource voice,
data and Internet services by utilizing our product line and by continually
seeking business solutions the customer desires.
We obtain leads for potential customers in the following ways:
6
<PAGE>
-- Manufacturers provide leads from their customers;
-- Internal sales force;
-- Outside telemarketers are utilized;
-- Referrals from existing customers;
-- Marketing lists are purchased;
-- Yellow Pages advertising; and
-- Print advertising.
All leads are given to individual account managers to follow-up with
each customer. Once a customer has agreed to purchase the equipment and
services, 2-I Voice Solutions does the installation and provides all the
follow-up customer support.
2-I Voice Solutions has designed the following strategy intended to
make the Company a leader in the telephone marketplace:
-- Market product lines which give clients the latest features at
a discount over competing systems;
-- Focus on LAN based business phone systems; and
-- Build an interactive demonstration room that provides
potential clients a hands-on approach to the products and
services.
Oil and Gas Exploration Projects and Operations
The Company invested in the South Halter Island Prospect, located in
St. Mary and Terrebonne Parishes, Louisiana, in which the Company is under
contract with Panaco, Inc., York Resources, Inc., Janivo Realty, Inc., and
Carson Energy, Inc., which entitles the Company to a 7.5% working interest and a
75% net revenue interest in a specific oil well. The Company's initial
investment into the project was $24,000, plus an additional $163,748, which
represented the Company's share of the operating expenses. On July 27, 1999,
this well was plugged and abandoned. The Company accrued an additional $17,772
at December 31, 1999 for it's portion of the costs to complete the plug and
abandonment of the well.
The Company invested in the VUA: Bernard #1 Well, located in Lafayette
Parish, Louisiana, and owns a 100% working interest and a 73.74% net revenue
interest in this oil well. The Company's initial investment in this project was,
$35,000, plus an additional $55,112, which represented the operating and
work-over expenses. The Company received $8,765 for its portion of the revenue
from production in 1999. Production on the well has ceased and the Company plans
to plug and abandon the well in 2000.
COMPETITION.
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and we believe
that competition is increasing. We may not be able to compete in those markets
effectively, especially against established industry leaders competitors with
greater marketplace presence and financial resources. The competitive
environments for our different sectors are as follows:
Internet Access and Voice and Data Product Sector
Presently, there are no direct competitors in the Houston, Texas market
to our approach to digital bundled services. However, there are many competitors
offering DSL services in the Houston, Texas market and elsewhere. For instance,
two of our competitors outside the Houston, Texas market would include CAIS
Internet, Inc. and LMKI, Inc. Additionally, we compete with many other companies
offering alternative forms of Internet access, such as coaxial cable, wireless
facilities and fiber optic cable. Lastly, we also compete with smaller, regional
Internet service providers and cable companies that operate in the same
geographical areas that we serve. The lack of substantial barriers to entry into
the Internet services market will likely result in additional competition. There
can be no assurance that the public will accept, on a widespread basis, our
products and services over the available alternatives. Likewise, it is not
certain that we will be able to compete in our current marketplace against some
of our competitors who are larger, well-financed, and currently hold stronger
market positions.
7
<PAGE>
Oil and Gas Exploration Sector
All phases of the oil and gas industry are highly competitive. Our
competitors include major oil and gas companies, as well as numerous other
independent oil and gas concerns and individual producers and operators. Many of
these competitors have financial and other resources that are substantially
greater than those available to us. Oil and gas producers also compete with
other industries that supply energy and fuel.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS.
Internet Access and Voice and Data Product Sector
As an Internet service provider, we are not currently subject to direct
regulation by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). Nevertheless,
Internet-related regulatory policies are continuing to develop and vigorous
public debates regarding the costs and benefits of regulating the Internet have
emerged in federal, state and local legislative, executive and regulatory agency
forums. It is possible that we could be exposed to regulation in the future. For
example, the FCC has stated its intention to consider whether to regulate voice
and fax telephony services provided over the Internet as "telecommunications"
even though Internet access itself would not be regulated; and the FCC recently
initiated a Notice of Inquiry to examine this issue. The FCC is also considering
whether such Internet-based telephone service should be subject to universal
service support obligations, or pay carrier access charges on the same basis as
traditional telecommunications companies.
A decision by Congress or the FCC to regulate Internet telephony or
Internet access services may limit the growth of the Internet, increase our cost
of doing business or increase our legal exposure, any of which could cause our
revenues to decrease.
We also face government regulation regarding the content and
communications provided by third parties and carried over, or hosted on, our
facilities. For instance, we are obligated to comply with the requirements of
the Digital Millennium Copyright Act concerning responses to claims of copyright
infringement. We also are required to comply with state and federal privacy
requirements, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act ("ECPA") and
the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act ("COPPA"). The ECPA imposes
limitations on the interception, disclosure and use of communications
transmitted over and stored on our facilities. COPPA, and the Federal Trade
Commission rules implementing that statute, requires us to safeguard personal
information that we know to be transmitted to our web site by children under 13.
We also are subject to federal and state laws that regulate the
advertising and sale of certain products and services over the Internet. In
addition to existing statutes of this kind, such as state statutes that prohibit
advertisement of gambling, a number of bills are pending in the Congress and
state legislatures that would prohibit or regulate particular marketing
practices (such as the transmission of unsolicited commercial email) or the
advertisement or sale of certain goods and services.
Oil and Gas Exploration Sector
The oil and gas industry is extensively regulated by federal, state and
local authorities. Legislation affecting the oil and gas industry is under
constant review for amendment or expansion. Numerous departments and agencies,
both federal and state, have issued rules and regulations binding on the oil and
gas industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial
penalties for the failure to comply. Because these laws and regulations are
frequently amended, reinterpreted or expanded, we are unable to predict the
future cost or impact of complying with such laws and regulations.
The production of oil and gas in Texas is regulated by The Texas
Railroad Commission, and in Louisiana, by The Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources. Both agencies have enacted various levels of regulations governing
various actions in the oil and gas industry, such as requiring permits for the
drilling of wells,
8
<PAGE>
maintaining bonding requirements in order to drill or operate wells, regulating
the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use
and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilling and the plugging and
abandonment of wells.
Our operations are also subject to various conservation laws and
regulations. These include the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing
units or proration units and the density of wells which may be drilled and
unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties. In addition, conservation laws
establish maximum rates of production requirements regarding the ratability of
production.
Our oil and gas operations are subject to extensive federal, state and
local laws and regulations dealing with environmental protection, including, but
not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act ("CERCLA"), also known as "Superfund," and similar state statutes.
Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment
of administrative, civil, or criminal penalties.
Our onshore operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations
controlling the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise
relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations, among
other things, may: impose absolute liability on the lessee under a lease for the
cost of clean-up of pollution resulting from a lessee's operations; subject the
lessee to liability for pollution damages; require suspension or cessation of
operations in affected areas; and impose restrictions on the injection of
liquids into subsurface aquifers that may contaminate groundwater. Persons who
are or were responsible for releases of hazardous substances under CERCLA may be
subject to joint and several liability for the remediation and clean-up costs
and for damages to natural resources.
Our oil and gas operations are also subject to the Clean Water Act and
the Clean Air Act, as amended, and comparable state statutes. Our operations may
generate or transport both hazardous and nonhazardous solid wastes that are
subject to the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
("RCRA") and comparable state laws and regulations. In addition, we currently
own or lease, and have in the past owned or leased, properties that have been
used for oil and gas operations for many years. Although we have utilized
operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time,
hydrocarbons or other wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under
the properties owned or leased by us or on or under other locations where such
wastes have been taken for disposal. Many of these properties have been operated
by third parties whose operations were not under our control. These properties
and the wastes disposed thereon may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA, and analogous
state laws, and we could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed
wastes or property contamination or perform remedial plugging operations to
prevent future contamination.
EMPLOYEES.
As of June 1, 2000, the Company had 42 full-time employees. None of our
employees are covered by any collective bargaining agreement. We believe that
our relations with our employees are good.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.
The Company's principal executive offices are located at 4828 Loop
Central Drive, Suite 150, Houston, Texas 77081, which is occupied under a lease
ending October 31, 2007 for $18,318.07 per month. At the end of such term, we
believe that we can lease the same or comparable offices at approximately the
same monthly rate.
AirNexus maintains executive offices located at 333 N. Sam Houston
Parkway East, Suite 870, Houston, Texas 77060, which they occupy under a lease
ending October 1, 2004 for $5,492.00 per month. The Company is currently
involved in negotiations to sublease this space.
Lakota Oil maintains executive offices located at 3303 FM 1960 West
Suite F, Houston, Texas 77068, which they occupy under a lease ending July 31,
2000 for $495.00 per month. At the end of such term the lease will be terminated
and all operations will move to the executive offices.
9
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Company filed a complaint in December 1999 in the 80th District
Court of Harris County, Texas against Tiger Petroleum, Inc. and Mr. Kenny
Vincent. This claim is based on a breach of a settlement agreement entered into
by the Company and the defendants on March 25, 1999. The Company is seeking the
return of 300,000 shares of common stock, plus attorneys' fees and court costs.
Discovery has been commenced and it is anticipated that if this case is not
resolved in mediation, it will be docketed for trial in the last quarter of
2000.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
In January 1999 and April 1999, the Company sold an aggregate of
1,040,000 units in a private placement under Rule 506 of Regulation D and
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 to the following accredited
investors:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
A Warrant B Warrant
Person Shares Share Price Exercise Price Exercise Price
------ ------ ----------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael A. Hancock 125,000 $.10 .10 .15
Steven Morrison 125,000 $.10 .10 .15
Dipak Bhatt 750,000 $.10 .15 .20
Michael McGrey 40,000 $.09 .12 .15
</TABLE>
Each Unit consisted of one share of restricted common stock, one "A"
warrant to acquire one share of common stock within twelve (12) months from the
date of purchase, and one "B" warrant to acquire one share of common stock
within twenty four (24) months of the date of purchase.
In February 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares
of restricted common stock under Rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933 to Cactus Petroleum, Inc., an entity controlled by
John B. Hayes, a former Director of the Company. These shares were issued as
consideration for the services provided pursuant to an agreement with Optima
Investments, Inc. in connection with the private placement of securities under
Rule 504 of Regulation D. Mr. Hayes assisted in the identification, negotiation,
and closing of the transaction with Optima. Mr. Hayes was also issued 300,000
shares of restricted common stock in July 1999 as consideration under a verbal
employment agreement with the Company.
In March 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 18,520 shares of
common stock under Rule 504 of Regulation D to MRC Legal Services Corporation
(16,668 shares) and Brian Lebrecht, Esq. (1,852 shares), accredited investors
acting as securities counsel to the Company, in exchange for legal services
rendered. In July 1999, an aggregate of 75,000 shares of restricted common stock
was issued to MRC Legal Services Corporation under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933 for legal services rendered. In September 1999, an
aggregate of 400,000 shares of restricted common stock was issued to MRC Legal
Services Corporation (300,000 shares) and Brian Lebrecht, Esq. (100,000 Shares)
under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for legal services rendered.
In March 1999, the Company sold $10,000 aggregate principal amount of
convertible debentures to Southwest Securities, an accredited entity under Rule
504 of Regulation D. The debenture was convertible into shares of common stock
of the Company at the discretion of the holder thereof. The entire debenture was
converted into an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock.
In March and April 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 160,000
shares of common stock under Rule 504 of Regulation D to PMR & Associates, an
accredited entity providing public relations services to the Company, in
exchange for services rendered.
10
<PAGE>
In March 1999, the Company sold aggregate principal amount of $550,000
aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures to the following three
individuals located outside the United States under Rule 504 of Regulation D:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Person Shares Conversion Price Range
------ ------ ----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Y. L. Hirsch 3,062,609 $.05 - $.10
Amram Rothman 2,739,842 $.05 - $.10
Joshua Heimlich 1,883,130 $.05 - $.10
</TABLE>
The debentures were convertible into shares of common stock of the
Company at the discretion of the holder thereof. All of the debentures have been
converted into an aggregate of 7,685,581 shares of common stock.
In April 1999, the Company issued 1,676,429 and 1,229,643 shares of
common stock to Robert Kent Honeyman and Howard Wilson, respectively, in
exchange for deferred compensation due to them under verbal employment
agreements with the Company. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933.
In June 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares at
$.38 per share of restricted common stock to Majed Jalali, the sole shareholder
of 2-Infinity.com, Inc., pursuant to the acquisition agreement between the
Company and Jalali. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933.
In June through November 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of
365,000 of restricted shares as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Person Shares Share price
------ ------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Jaime Benrey 160,000 $.12
Abraham Halpern 30,000 $.30
Donald Murray 100,000 $.30
William Kohler 20,000 $.30
Douglas Chadwick 10,000 $.10
Chrespin Noches 5,000 $.30
Michael McGrey 40,000 $.12
</TABLE>
The shareholders exercised warrants acquired in the previous unit
offering. As a result of the exercise, the Company received $79,700. The
issuance was exempt under Rule 506 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of
1933.
In June 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares at
$.32 per share of restricted common stock to Patrick Cody Morgan, Charles H.
Downey, Jr. and Candus Morgan in connection with the acquisition of Voice
Design, Inc. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of
1933.
In July 1999, the Company sold $74,000 aggregate principal amount of
convertible debentures to HLKT Holdings, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company, under Rule 504 of Regulation D. The debentures were ultimately
converted into an aggregate of 793,966 shares of common stock of the Company.
In July 1999, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock to John
B. Hayes in exchange for deferred compensation owed to him under a verbal
employment arrangement with the Company.
In July 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 495,385 shares of
restricted common stock to Brent Cavazos, an accredited investor and litigation
counsel to the Company, in exchange for legal services rendered. The issuance
was exempt under Rule 506 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
In August 1999, the Company sold $23,500 aggregate principal amount of
convertible debentures to HLKT Holdings, LLC an accredited Colorado limited
liability company, under Rule 504 of Regulation D. The debentures were
ultimately converted into an aggregate of 391,250 shares of common stock of the
Company.
11
<PAGE>
In August 1999, the Company issued $750,000 aggregate principal amount
of 8% convertible debentures exercisable at 75% of the fair market value of the
Company's common stock on the date of conversion. In addition, the Company
issued 5,000,000 warrants at an exercise price of 50% of the fair market value
of the Company's stock on the date of exercise. In addition, $250,000 of the
$750,000 of proceeds was held in escrow until all covenants under the
subscription agreements were met, including an effective registration statement
for the resale of the shares, which the Company did not fulfill. Effective
January 18, 2000, the Company completed a settlement with the debenture holders,
canceling all previous agreements in exchange for 1,500,000 shares of the
Company's common stock to the investors listed below and $324,750 of 8%
convertible debentures exercisable at 50% of the fair market value of the
company's stock on the date of conversion. The debentures were subsequently
converted into 3,392,857 shares of common stock and issued to the investors
listed below. Total proceeds to the Company was $500,000 relating to the
transaction.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Investor Shares Price per Share
-------- ------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
HLKT Holdings, LLC 500,000 .17
HLKT Holdings, LLC 1,328,571 .081
DVH Holdings, LLC 500,000 .17
DVH Holdings, LLC 1,033,334 .105
M&B Trading 500,000 .17
M&B Trading 1,030,952 .105
</TABLE>
In September 1999, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares at $.14 per
share of restricted common stock to Mathew Hensley, an accredited investor, for
$210,000. Mr. Hensley also received warrants to acquire 500,000 shares of common
stock at $0.28 per share, exercisable until September 28, 2001. The issuance was
pursuant to an exemption under Rule 506 of Regulation D.
Currently, our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. As
such, the market price of our common stock may be subject to significant
fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including: variations in our
annual or quarterly financial results or those of our competitors; changes by
financial research analysts in their estimates of our earnings or our failure to
meet such estimates; conditions in the economy in general or in the software and
other technology industries; announcements of key developments by competitors;
loss of key personnel; unfavorable publicity affecting our industry or us;
adverse legal events affecting us; and sales of our common stock by existing
shareholders.
From time to time, the stock market experiences significant price and
volume fluctuations, which may affect the market price of our common stock for
reasons unrelated to our performance. Recently, such volatility has particularly
impacted the stock prices of publicly-traded technology companies. In the past,
securities class action litigation has been instigated against companies
following periods of volatility in the market price of the companies'
securities. If similar litigation were instituted against us, it could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention and resources,
which could have an adverse effect on our business.
The following table presents the high and low sales price of our common
stock for the listed quarters:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SALES PRICE
-----------
YEAR QUARTER HIGH LOW
---- ------- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1999 First Quarter 0.27 0.07
Second Quarter 0.62 0.06
Third Quarter 0.37 0.14
Fourth Quarter
1998 First Quarter 1.22 0.31
Second Quarter 0.44 0.06
Third Quarter 0.38 0.04
Fourth Quarter 0.38 0.02
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
The number of beneficial holders of record of the common stock of the
Company as of the close of business on March 3, 2000 was approximately 195. The
Company has never paid dividends on its common stock.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.
General
Since inception through May 1999, the Company devoted substantially all
of its efforts to invest with joint partners in oil and gas exploration
projects. However, as a result of minimal revenue and continued losses from
these ventures, the Company decided to diversify into other markets, primarily
technology and the Internet. The Company's acquisition of 2-Infinity-Texas and
AirNexus provided the ability to enter into the technology and Internet markets.
However, the Company has not operated profitably to date and there are no
assurances that there will be future profitable operations.
In January 2000, new board members and senior management were appointed
in connection with running operations and raising additional capital through a
private placement. The new management adopted new strategies for the Company and
developed a plan of action as follows:
-- The Company is pursuing additional strategic alliances to
expand the development and marketing of its core technological
products and services surrounding high-speed Internet access.
-- The Company is obtaining customers and a monthly revenue
stream by waiving activation fees and hardware costs in return
for long-term contracts.
-- The Company is implementing an aggressive marketing and sales
program targeting commercial customers to sell them DSL
high-speed Internet access and other related products and
services.
-- The Company is raising additional equity through private
placements to cover costs associated with its initial
marketing plan and the necessary infrastructure to effect its
business plan.
Management believes the successful completion of its plans, will
produce increased revenues and cash flows. However, no assurance can be given
that the Company will be successful in the implementation of its plans or that
the Company will be able to raise additional funds.
Results of Operations
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999 increased $257,316 from
no revenues reported for the year ended December 31, 1998. This increase was
primarily due to the acquisition of AirNexus and the sales of commercial voice
and data products and services.
Cost of Sales for the year ended December 31, 1999 increased $159,209
from no such costs reported for the year ended December 31, 1998. This increase
was due to the acquisition of AirNexus and the cost of the commercial voice and
data products.
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 1999 increased
$2,172,528 from no amortization expense reported for the year ended December 31,
1998. This increase is due to the write-off of goodwill associated with
2-Infinity and the AirNexus acquisitions, which was determined to be impaired
because of the circumstances that exist indicating the carrying amount of those
assets may not be recoverable. The total goodwill was amortized because of the
impairment.
Oil and gas properties expenditures for the year ended December 31,
1999 increased to $341,444 from no such expenditures reported for the year ended
December 31, 1998. This increase was primarily due to the increase in activity
in 1999 in investments with joint partners in oil and gas exploration projects,
primarily in the following three projects:
13
<PAGE>
-- The South Halter Island Prospect, located in St. Mary and
Terrebonne Parishes, Louisiana, in which the well was
non-producing and was plugged and abandoned in July 1999.
Total costs expensed relating to this well in 1999 were
$205,520.
-- The Union Central Life Insurance Co. Well No. 1, located in
Colorado County, Texas, in which the development of this well
is currently ongoing and production commenced at the end of
December 1999. Total costs expensed relating to this well in
1999 were $36,649.
-- The VUA: Bernard #1, located in Lafayette Parish, Louisiana,
in which the well produced $8,765 in 1999 and subsequent to
year-end it was determined that future costs to continue
production will exceed any potential revenue. As such, the
well will be plugged and abandoned in 2000. Total costs
expensed relating to this well in 1999 were $90,112.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31,
1999, increased $9,379,629 or 2,671% to $9,730,768 from $351,139 in the year
ended December 31, 1998. The increase is primarily due to $7,934,529 of
additional compensation as a result of salary increases and stock awards issued
to current and former officers and employees for services performed in 1999,
$688,653 for the additional general and administrative expense as a result of
acquiring 2-Infinity and AirNexus, and $547,959 of additional legal, consulting
and professional fees to complete the convertible debt and equity financings and
oil and gas related transactions in 1999.
Interest Expense for the year ended December 31, 1999, increased
$431,551 or 7,859% to $437,042 from $5,491 in the year ended December 31, 1998.
The increase is primarily due to the additional interest of $404,500 recorded as
a result of the settlement with the holders of $750,000 aggregate principal
amount of 8% convertible debentures completed in January, 2000. The Company
completed a settlement with the debenture holders, canceling all previous
agreements in exchange for 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock and
$324,750 aggregate principal amount of 8% convertible debentures exercisable at
50% of the fair market value of the Company's stock on the date of exercise. The
debentures were subsequently converted into 3,392,857 shares. Total proceeds to
the Company, net of the original $40,000 fee, was $460,000 relating to the
transaction. The Company recorded the transaction as if the settlement occurred
prior to year-end.
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1999 increased by $12,231,681
or 3,431% to $12,588,149 from $356,468 for the comparable period in the prior
year. The Company expects to incur additional losses until its revised business
strategy results in sufficient revenues to offset its investment and operating
expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company raised $1,187,500 from notes payable and the sale of
convertible debentures during the year ended December 31, 1999. In addition the
company raised $430,000 in private placements of common stock to accredited
investors and options and $175,630 from the exercise of common stock warrants.
In the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, the Company raised $344,378
in private placements of common stock of accredited investors.
The Company is currently operating at a loss and expects to continue to
depend on cash generated from the sale of debt and equity securities to fund its
operating deficit. There can be no assurance that the company will be able to
generate sufficient revenues to meet its operating cash and growth needs or that
any equity or debt funding will be available or at terms acceptable to the
Company in the future to enable it to continue operating in its current form.
The Company's loss for the fiscal year ended December 31,1999 was
$(12,588,149). The Company expects to incur losses for the foreseeable future
due to the ongoing activities of the Company to develop a network operations
center and continue its strategy of installing and maintaining DSL equipment in
facilities such as commercial buildings and multi-tenant dwellings. The Company
believes that this strategy, while initially requiring additional cash outlays,
will result in
14
<PAGE>
higher margins and longer customer retention. The Company expects its existing
operations to continue to result in negative cash flow and working capital
deficiencies that will require the Company to continue to obtain additional
capital.
Based on current commitments and on going working capital needs, the
Company believes that it will require substantial additional debt or equity
funding to continue to implement its revised business strategy, including
acquisitions. The Company's cash needs and usage may vary based on the outcome
of these initiatives. There can be no assurance that the necessary financing
will be available to the Company or, if available, that the same will be on
terms satisfactory or favorable to it. It is possible that additional equity
financing will be highly dilutive to existing shareholders.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
15
<PAGE>
CONTENTS
Independent Auditors' Report.......................................F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheet.........................................F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations..............................F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)..........F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows..............................F-9
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements....................F-11
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors
Lakota Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(A Development Stage Company)
Atlanta, Georgia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Lakota
Technologies, Inc. (formerly Lakota Energy, Inc.) and Subsidiaries (a
development stage company) as of December 31, 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 and from inception
on November 14, 1995 through December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lakota Technologies,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (a development stage company) as of December 31, 1999 and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998 and from inception on November 14, 1995 through
December 31, 1999 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company is a development stage company
with no significant operating results to date, which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard
to these matters are also described in Note 4. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
/s/ Jones, Jensen & Company
Jones, Jensen & Company
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 14, 2000
F-2
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1999
-----------------
<S> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash $ 65,413
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $1,268 17,044
Loan receivable employees 1,290
Security deposit 16,191
-----------------
Total Current Assets 99,938
-----------------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Furniture and fixtures 44,951
Equipment 39,140
Less: accumulated depreciation (12,263)
-----------------
Total Property and Equipment 71,828
-----------------
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES (Notes 1 and 2) 57,225
-----------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 228,991
=================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Continued)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1999
-----------------
<S> <C>
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 110,795
Notes payable (Note 6) 545,000
Accrued expenses 126,739
Accrued compensation 7,509,459
Accrued interest payable 419,500
-----------------
Total Current Liabilities 8,711,493
-----------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock 25,000,000 shares authorized,
no par value; no shares outstanding -
Common stock 100,000,000 shares authorized, no par
value; 41,278,482 shares issued and outstanding 5,662,968
Deficit accumulated during the development stage (14,145,470)
-----------------
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (8,482,502)
-----------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) $228,991
==================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
From
Inception on
For the Years November 14,
Ended December 31, 1995 Through
------------------------------------ December 31,
1999 1998 1999
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES $ 257,316 $ - $ 257,316
COST OF SALES 159,209 - 159,209
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
GROSS MARGIN 98,107 - 98,107
EXPENSES
Depreciation expense 14,449 1,200 16,849
Amortization expense 2,172,528 - 2,172,528
Oil and gas properties expenditures 341,444 - 342,644
General and administrative 9,730,768 351,139 10,492,623
----------------- ---------------- -----------------
Total Expenses 12,259,189 352,339 13,024,644
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
Loss from Operations (12,161,082) ((352,339) (12,926,537)
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest expense (437,042) (5,491) (1,230,670)
Interest income 13,495 1,362 15,257
Loss on disposal of assets (3,520) (3,520)
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
Total Other Income (Expense) (427,067) (4,129) (1,218,933)
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
NET LOSS $ (12,588,149) $ (356,468) $ (14,145,470)
================ ================ =================
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE $ (0.36) $ (0.03)
================ ================
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING 34,569,693 13,371,602
================ ================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Deficit
Accumulated
Common Stock During the
--------------------------------------- Development
Shares Amount Stage
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at inception on
November 14, 1995 - $ - $ -
Net loss for the period ended
December 31, 1995 - - (1,683)
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance, December 31, 1995 - - (1,683)
Issuance of common stock to founders
at approximately $0.00 per share 9,187,500 1,250 -
Issuance of common stock in merger with
Chancellor Trading Group, Inc. at $0.002 1,801,000 3,908 -
Issuance of common stock for cash 108,000 108,000 -
at $1.00 per share
Issuance of common stock for services 20,000 20,000 -
at $1.00 per share
Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 1996 - - (458,412)
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance, December 31, 1996 11,116,500 133,158 (460,095)
Common stock issued for cash at $1.00
per share 212,500 212,500 -
Conversion of preferred stock to common
stock at $1.00 per share 812,500 812,500 -
Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 1997 - - (740,758)
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance, December 31, 1997 12,141,500 $ 1,158,158 $ (1,200,853)
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Deficit
Accumulated
Common Stock During the
--------------------------------------- Development
Shares Amount Stage
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1997 12,141,500 $ 1,158,158 $ (1,200,853)
Common stock issued for cash at
approximately $0.10 per share 3,608,800 344,378 -
Common stock issued for services
at approximately $0.03 per share 4,928,433 147,853 -
Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 1998 - - (356,468)
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance, December 31, 1998 20,678,733 1,650,389 (1,557,321)
Common stock issued for cash
at approximately $0.12 per share 1,360,000 167,600 -
Common stock issued for debt
at approximately $0.07 per share 7,685,581 550,000 -
Common stock issued in business
combination at $0.35 per share 6,000,000 2,100,000 -
Common stock issued for services
at approximately $0.12 per share 5,054,977 598,538 -
Options issued for cash at approximately
$0.10 per share - 100,000 -
Stock issued for debt and interest at approximately
$0.09 per share 1,185,216 104,091 -
Funds received for stock to be issued 200,000 20,000 -
subsequent to year end, 200,000 shares at
$0.10 per share
Stock issued for cash at approximately
$0.12 per share 2,560,300 318,030 -
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
Balance forward 44,724,807 $ 5,608,648 $ (1,557,321)
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Deficit
Accumulated
Common Stock During the
--------------------------------------- Development
Shares Amount Stage
----------------- ----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance forward 44,724,807 $ 5,608,648 $ (1,557,321)
Stock issued for services at approximately
$0.14 per share 400,000 54,320 -
Common stock canceled (Note 11) (3,846,325) - -
Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 1999 - - (12,588,149)
----------------- ---------------- ------------------
Balance, December 31, 1999 41,278,482 $ 5,662,968 $ (14,145,470)
================= ================= ==================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-8
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
From
Inception on
For the Years November 14,
Ended December 31, 1995 Through
------------------------------------- December 31,
1999 1998 1999
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss) $ (12,588,149) $ (356,468) $ (14,145,470)
Adjustments to reconcile net d(loss to net
cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation expense 14,449 1,200 16,849
Loss on disposal of assets 3,520 - 3,520
Amortization expense 2,172,528 - 2,174,156
Common stock issued for services 8,570,476 147,853 8,738,329
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (17,044) - (17,044)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 108,691 2,104 110,795
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses 62,414 6,476 82,229
(Increase) decrease in other assets (2,295) - (17,481)
Increase in related party receivable - (33,870) -
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities (1,675,410) (232,705) (3,054,117)
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of property and equipment (84,397) - (100,518)
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Net Cash (Used) by Investing Activities (84,397) - (100,518)
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payment of notes payable (60,000) (22,098) (110,532)
Proceeds from notes payable/debenture 1,187,500 - 1,242,414
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock - - 812,500
Issuance of common stock and options 605,630 344,378 1,275,666
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 1,733,130 322,280 3,220,048
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH (26,677) 89,575 65,413
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 92,090 2,515 -
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
CASH AT END OF PERIOD $ 65,413 $ 92,090 $ 65,413
================== ================= ==================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-9
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
From
Inception on
For the Years November 14,
Ended December 31, 1995 Through
------------------------------------- December 31,
1999 1998 1999
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR:
Interest $ 4,739 $ - $ 4,739
Income taxes $ - $ - $ -
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
Common stock and debt issued for services $ 8,570,476 $ 147,853 $ 8,738,329
Organization costs paid by related party $ - $ - $ 5,472
Issuance of preferred stock for oil and
gas properties $ - $ - $ 812,500
Common stock issued for business
acquisition $ 2,100,000 $ - $ 2,100,000
Common stock issued for debt $ 647,500 $ - $ 647,500
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-10
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
NOTE 1 HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION
The consolidated financial statements presented are those of
Lakota Technologies, Inc. (formerly Lakota Energy, Inc.) ("the
Company") (a development stage company) and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, 2-Infinity.com, Inc.("2-Infinity-Texas"),
AirNexus, Inc., and Lakota Oil and Gas, Inc. The Company was
incorporated in the state of Colorado on July 14, 1995 to
engage in the acquisition and exploration of oil and gas
properties. In 1999, management diversified into the
technology and Internet markets, acquiring two
companies 2-Infinity.com, Inc. ("2-Infinity-Texas") and
AirNexus, Inc. ("AirNexus").
On May 28, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding
stock of 2-Infinity-Texas, a Texas Corporation. As
consideration for the acquisition, the Company issued
3,000,000 shares of its common stock to the sole shareholder
and founder of 2-Infinity-Texas. 2-Infinity-Texas provides
digital bundled services, including high-speed Internet
access. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
On June 8, 1999, the Company acquired all of the shares of
Voice Design, Inc., a Texas Corporation that later changed its
name to AirNexus. As consideration for the acquisition, the
Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its common stock and
$60,000 cash to the shareholders of AirNexus. AirNexus is a
retail provider of commercial voice and data products and
services. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
On June 9, 1999, the Company formed Lakota Oil & Gas, Inc.
("Lakota Oil"), a 100% owned subsidiary. The Company
transferred the Company's interest in two active oil
exploration projects into Lakota Oil. As of December 31, 1999,
Lakota Oil had minimal operations with only one well in
production.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a. Basis of Presentation
Principles of consolidation - The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Lakota Technologies, Inc.
and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company balances
and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
Accounting for oil and gas producing activities - The Company
uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and
gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests
in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory
wells that find proved reserves, and to drill and equip
development wells are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory
wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and
geophysical costs, and costs of carrying and retaining
unproved properties are expensed.
F-11
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
b. Revenue Recognition
The Company has recorded revenues from its percentage interest
in the oil production from the producing oil and gas wells.
Revenue from the production of oil is recognized when the oil
is removed from the well. Revenues for 1999 also include
revenues from the Company's newly acquired technology
subsidiary, AirNexus since June 8,1999. 2-Infinity-Texas
reported no revenues in 1999. Revenue From business telephone
and voice mail systems products are recorded when shipped and
any related services revenue are recorded when the services
are rendered to the customer.
c. Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share excludes dilution and was computed by
dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the Period. Dilutive loss per
share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other obligations to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings or
losses of the Company. For all periods presented, basic and
diluted loss per share were equal, as the inclusion of
dilutive securities would be antidilutive. Total warrants
outstanding as of December 31, 1999 were 5,002,500. There were
no warrants outstanding at December 31, 1998.
d. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
e. Provision for Taxes
At December 31, 1999, the Company had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $5,375,000 that may be offset
against future taxable income through 2017. No tax benefit has
been reported in the consolidated financial statements. The
related benefit has been offset by a valuation allowance due
to historical operating losses and the uncertainty if the net
loss carryforwards will be utilized in future periods.
f. Amortization
Oil and gas wells will be amortized using the
units-of-production method on the basis of total estimated
units of proven reserves. Amortization will not be recorded
until reserves are extracted.
g. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for
small tools, ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to
operations as incurred. Major additions and improvements are
capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over estimated useful lives of the assets of 3 to 5
years.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 1999 and
1998 was $14,449 and $1,200, respectively.
F-12
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
h. Advertising
The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of
advertising to expense as incurred.
i. Goodwill
The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment under
FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of
long-Lived Assets. Under those rules, goodwill associated with
assets acquired in a purchase business combination where
determined to be impaired because circumstances exist that
indicate the carrying amount of those assets may not be
recoverable. The total goodwill was amortized because of the
impairment and recognized in 1999.
NOTE 3 BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On May 28, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding
shares of 2-Infinity-Texas, a provider of high-speed Internet
access products and services, for 3,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock. 2-Infinity-Texas had only been in
existence for a short period of time and had no prior
operations. The acquisition has been accounted for as a
purchase. The agreement also provides additional consideration
based upon achieving certain revenue performance goals for up
to an additional 6,000,000 shares. In January 2000, the
additional consideration was cancelled.
On June 9, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding
shares of AirNexus, a retail provider of commercial voice and
data products and services. The Company issued 3,000,000
shares of common stock and $60,000 in cash in exchange for all
of the outstanding shares if AirNexus. The acquisition has
been accounted for as a purchase. The agreement also provides
additional consideration based upon achieving certain revenue
performance goals for up to an additional 3,000,000 shares. In
January 2000, the additional consideration was cancelled.
Allocation of the purchase price for the acquisitions is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2-Infinity-Texas AirNexus
------------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill $ 1,139,000 $ 1,020,000
Cash 104,479 515
Property and equipment 5,731 -
Other assets 1,669 9,238
Liabilities assumed (50,879) (129,753)
------------------ -----------------
Total Purchase Price $ 1,200,000 $ 900,000
================== =================
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
The following pro forma financial information gives effect to
the 2-Infinity-Texas and AirNexus acquisitions as if they had
been acquired at the beginning of fiscal years 1998 and 1999.
The pro forma results were prepared for comparative purposes
only and are not indicative of the results of operations which
actually would result had the acquisitions occurred on the
date indicated, or which may result in the future:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------
1999 1998
--------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 351,226 $ 201,451
Loss from operations (12,158,343) (295,051)
Net loss (12,581,854) (298,470)
Basic and diluted loss per share $ ( 0.53) $ (0.02)
Basic and diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding 34,613,638 13,371,602
</TABLE>
NOTE 4 GOING CONCERN
Since inception through May 1999, the Company devoted
substantially all of its efforts to invest with joint partners
in oil and gas exploration projects. However, as a result of
minimal revenue and continued losses from these ventures, the
Company decided to diversify into other markets primarily
technology and the Internet. The Company's acquisition of
2-Infinity-Texas and AirNexus provided the ability to enter
into the technology, Internet market. However, the Company has
not operated profitably to date and there are no assurance
that future operations will be profitable.
The Company incurred net losses of $(12,588,149) and
$(356,468) for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The Company's ability to operate as a going
concern is contingent upon its ability to effectively market
its newly acquired technology products and services and get it
to the marketplace. Future success is also dependent on the
Company's ability to obtain additional equity financing. The
aforementioned factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
In January 2000, new board members and senior management were
appointed in connection with running operations and raising
additional capital through the private placement (Note 13).
The new management adopted new strategies for the Company and
developed a plan of action as follows:
The Company is pursuing additional strategic
alliances to expand the development and marketing of
its core technological products and services
surrounding high-speed Internet access.
The Company is obtaining customers and monthly
revenue stream by waiving activation fees and
hardware costs in return for long-term contracts.
The Company is implementing an aggressive marketing
and sales program targeting commercial customers with
DSL ("Digital Subscriber Line"), high-speed Internet
access with the ability to additionally deliver other
related products and services.
The Company is raising additional equity through
private placements to cover the initial marketing
plan and infrastructure to acquire and maintain
anticipated revenue stream.
F-14
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
Management believes the successful completion of its plans,
will produce revenues and cash flows. However, no assurance
can be given that the Company will be successful in the
implementation of its plans or that the Company will be able
to raise additional funds. In the event the Company's
activities do not result in increased revenues and cash flows
and the Company is not able to raise additional financing to
meet its operating needs, the Company may no longer be able to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might be necessary should the
Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 5 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In February 1999, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of
restricted common stock to an entity controlled by the
President of Lakota Oil, as consideration for services valued
at $100,000 related to the negotiation and consummation of a
transaction with an oil and gas project.
In January and February 2000, the Company mutually separated
from three officers and directors, its CEO, CFO and the
President of Lakota Oil. Included in the settlement agreements
with the former CEO, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares and
$100,000 to compensate him for past service and the Company
paid $40,000 for the execution of the settlement agreement and
consulting services during the transition to new management.
Each party mutually discharged any indebtedness owed to the
other and Cam Am Resources, Inc, a related party of the CEO.
As a result, the Company has accrued at December,1999 $500,000
for compensation of past services at the fair market value of
the shares and cash issued as a result of this agreement. In
addition, included in the settlement agreements with the
former CFO and the President of Lakota Oil, the Company issued
an aggregate of 5,500,000 shares and $100,000 to compensate
them for past service and the Company paid an aggregate of
$65,000 for the execution of the agreements and consulting
services during the transition to new management. As a result,
the Company has accrued at December 31, 1999, $2,760,500 of
compensation expense at the fair market value of the shares
and cash issued as a result of these agreements.
Effective August 1, 1999, the Company approved and implemented
the Omnibus Stock Option Plan ("the Plan") and the board of
directors granted 2,000,000 options to purchase the Company's
common stock under the plan. In January 2000, the options
granted under the plan were cancelled as part of the
settlement and separation agreements with the option holders
and the Plan was terminated.
In April 2000, the board of directors approved the issuance of
4,040,000 common shares to employees and directors of the
Company as compensation for services performed from June
through January 2000. The shares were valued at the fair
market value on the date the board was authorized to grant the
shares, which was $1.156. In December 31, 1999,the company has
accrued $ 4,141,960 of compensation expense.
NOTE 6 NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable as of December 31, 1999 are detailed in the
following summary:
F-15
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
$750,000, 8% Convertible Debentures, $250,000
held in escrow (see Note 9) $ 500,000
Notes payable to individuals; convertible to stock at the option
of the holder within one to three years; interest at 9.75%, paid
quarterly until converted; unsecured. 40,000
Notes payable, due on demand, unsecured, non-interest bearing. 5,000
------------------
Total notes payable 545,000
Less: current portion (545,000)
------------------
Long-term portion $ -
==================
</TABLE>
NOTE 7 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
As a result of the acquisitions in 1999, the Company leases
four offices under lease agreements accounted for as operating
leases, three in Houston and one in Atlanta. Real estate
taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses are obligations of
the Company.
Minimum rental payments under the non-cancelable operating
leases are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Periods ended
December 31,
--------------------
<S> <C>
2000 $ 175,861
2001 173,693
2002 159,258
2003 72,597
2004 55,607
-------------------
$ 637,016
===================
</TABLE>
Rent expense was $89,652 and $26,013 for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Contingencies
The Company is arbitrating a claim arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of the Company's legal
counsel and management, any liability resulting from such
litigation would not be material in relation to the Company's
financial position
F-16
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES
The income tax benefit differs from the amount computed at
federal statutory rates of approximately 38% as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------------------ ----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Income tax benefit at statutory rate $ 4,783,000 $ 135,000
Change in valuation allowance (4,783,000) (135,000)
------------------------ ----------------------
$ - $ -
======================== ======================
</TABLE>
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) at December 31, 1999 are
comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------
1999 1998
----------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net operating loss carryforward $ 5,375,000 $ 592,000
Valuation allowance (5,375,000) (592,000)
----------------------- ----------------------
$ - $ -
======================= =======================
</TABLE>
Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform
Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for Federal
income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual
limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating
loss carryforwards maybe limited as to use in future years.
NOTE 9 CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
In March 1999, the Company issued $550,000 of 8% convertible
and incurred a fee of $44,000 on the issuance. All the
debentures were converted prior to December 31, 1999 into
7,685,581 shares of common stock.
In August 1999, the Company issued $23,500 of 3% Convertible
Debentures and $74,000 of 1% Convertible Debentures. All the
debentures were converted prior to December 31, 1999 into
1,185,216 shares of common stock.
In August 1999, the Company issued $750,000 of 8% convertible
debentures exercisable at 75% of fair market value of the
Company's common stock on the date of conversion. In addition,
the Company issued 5,000,000 warrants at an exercise price of
50% of the fair market value of the Company's stock on the
date of exercise. The Company incurred a fee of $40,000 for
the transaction. In addition, $250,000 of the $750,000 was
held in escrow until all requirements under the agreements
were met, to include an effective registration statement,
which the Company was in default on January 1, 2000. Effective
January 18, 2000, the Company completed a settlement with the
debenture holders, canceling all previous agreements in
exchange for 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock
and $324,750 of 8% convertible debentures exercisable at 50%
of the fair market value of the Company's stock. The
debentures were subsequently converted into 3,392,857 shares.
Total cash received, net of the original $40,000 fee, was
$460,000 relating to the transaction. The Company has
F-17
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
recorded the transaction as if the settlement occurred prior
to year-end. A charge to interest expense in the amount of
$404,500 has been recorded at December 31, 1999 relating to
this transaction.
NOTE 10 WARRANTS & OPTIONS
A summary of the status of the Company's warrants as of
December 31,1999 and changes during the period ending December
31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Average
Exercise
Shares Price
------------------ -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding, December 31 1998 - $ -
Granted 14,505,000 0.21
Expired (3,132,200) 0.18
Exercised (1,370,300) 0.13
Cancelled (note 9) (5,000,000) 50% of share price
------------------- ------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 1999 5,002,500 $ 0.25
================== ==================
Exercisable, December 31, 1999 5,002,500 $ 0.25
================== ==================
</TABLE>
The Company issued 1,000,000 options to purchase the Company's
common stock in June 1999 at $0.10 per share. The options
expired December 31, 1999.
NOTE 11 COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS
In 1997, the Company issued approximately 4,500,000 shares for
services. In 1999, the Company renegotiated the number of
shares since the services had not been performed as
anticipated. The Company received back and canceled 3,846,325
shares.
NOTE 12 OPERATING SEGMENTS
Effective June 30, 1999, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131,
"Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information." The Company conducts its operations principally
in the oil and gas industry through Lakota Oil and technology
industry through 2-Infinity-Texas and Air Nexus.
Certain financial information concerning the Company's
operations in different industries is as follows:
F-18
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the year ended December 31, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------
Oil and Gas
Exploration Technology Consolidated
--------------- --------------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 8,765 $ 248,550 $ 257,316
Operating loss applicable to
industry segment (5,260,100) (6,904,502) (12,164,602)
Write-down of goodwill - (2,159,000) (2,159,000)
Other income (expenses) -
interest income (424,035) 488 (423,547)
Assets 92,605 136,386 228,991
Depreciation expense 2,505 11,944 14,449
Property and equipment acquisition 3,815 80,276 84,091
</TABLE>
Prior to 1999, the Company only operated in the oil and gas
industry.
NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding
shares of AGM, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, a reporting public
company with no operations. The Company elected to have
successor issuer status to become a reporting public entity.
The purchase price was 2,200,000 shares of the Company's
common stock. In connection with this transaction, the Company
also issued 1,500,000 shares of stock and $50,000 for
consulting services to another corporation that assisted in
the negotiation and completion of the transaction.
In the first quarter of 2000, the Company completed a private
placement raising $2,000,000 by offering 20,000,000 shares of
the Company's common stock at $.10 per share. The offering
also includes for every two shares purchased, a warrant to
acquire an additional share of common stock at $.50,
exercisable for a period of one year from the date of
issuance.
On March 22, 2000, the Company acquired a CLEC license, a
contract that entitles the Company to resale Southwestern Bell
Telephone Company products and services at a 32% discount, for
$217,000 and 100,000 shares of common stock.
On April 7, 2000, the Company amended its lease agreement
relating to the primary office space in Houston. The agreement
extends the original lease to the year 2007 and provides the
terms for the expansion into additional office space
commencing May 1, 2000. The additional lease commitment under
this amendment to the non-cancelable operating lease is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Periods ended
December 31,
--------------------
<S> <C>
2000 $ 77,849
2001 118,319
2002 139,024
2003 235,527
2004 237,667
Thereafter 741,930
-------------------
$1,550,316
===================
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE>
LAKOTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 1999
On April 12, 2000, the shareholders of the Company approved
the increase in the number of authorized shares of common
stock outstanding to 300,000,000 shares and the Company's name
changed to 2-Infinity.com, Inc.
F-20
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current
directors and executive officers of the Company. Our executive officers are
elected annually by the Board of Directors. Our directors serve one year terms
until their successors are elected. The executive officers serve terms of one
year or until their death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors.
There are no family relationships between any of the directors and executive
officers. In addition, there was no arrangement or understanding between any
executive officer and any other person pursuant to which any person was selected
as an executive officer.
The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Positions
---- ---
<S> <C> <C>
Majed M. Jalali 26 Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and
President
Patrick Cody Morgan 33 Director, Chief Technology
Officer and Secretary
Kelly Nispel 37 Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
</TABLE>
MAJED M. JALALI has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors and
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2000. Prior
to that he served as President of 2-Infinity-Texas beginning in March 1999. From
January 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Jalali served as Chief Executive Officer of
Infinity International School. Prior thereto, Mr. Jalali was a university
student.
PATRICK CODY MORGAN has been the Vice President and Chief Technology
Officer and Secretary of the Company since January 2000. Prior to that, he was
the President of AirNexus, Inc. beginning in May 1998, as well as a member of
the board of directors. From October 1996 until May 1998, Mr. Morgan was a
partner in Digiphone. From 1994 to October 1996, Mr. Morgan was the general
manager of Digitech Business Systems, a Houston, Texas company that provided
business telephones and voicemail systems.
KELLY NISPEL has been Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for the
Company since March 2000. From 1997 to 2000, Ms. Nispel was employed by
Corporate Express Delivery Systems, Inc. (CEDS), recently acquired by United
Shipping and Technology, Inc., in a variety of positions from Director of
Finance to Vice President of Finance. Her responsibilities included SEC
financial reporting, senior lender reporting, banking relations and other
financial, tax and treasury matters. From 1996 to 1997, Ms. Nispel was employed
with Corporate Express, Inc., the parent company of CEDS, as a Regional
Assistant Controller. From 1993 to 1996, Ms. Nispel was the Chief Financial
Officer for Ovation Data Services, Inc., where she was responsible for all
financial related matters. Ms. Nispel is a certified public accountant in the
states of Texas and Colorado.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The directors have not received any compensation for serving in such
capacity, and we do not currently contemplate compensating our directors in the
future for serving in such capacity.
16
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Summary Compensation Table shows selected compensation information
for services rendered in all capacities for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999. Other than as set forth below, no executive officer's salary and bonus
exceeded $100,000 in any of the applicable years. The following information
includes the dollar value of base salaries and stock bonus awards, whether paid
or deferred.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Compensation(1) Long Term Compensation
------------------- ----------------------
Name and
Principal Position Year Salary ($) Restricted Stock Awards ($)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
R. K. ("Ken") Honeyman(2) 1999 222,328 134,114(4)
Former President and 1998 96,240 --
Director
Howard N. Wilson(2) 1999 123,746 98, 371(5)
Former Vice President and 1998 46,250 --
Secretary
John B. Hayes(3) 1999 76,903 196,000(6)
Former President of 1998 -- --
Lakota Oil & Gas
</TABLE>
(1) Excludes any perquisites and other benefits that do not exceed the lesser of
$50,000 or 10% of the total of annual salary and bonus reported for any
executive officer.
(2) No longer an executive of the company.
(3) Former President of Lakota Oil and Gas, Inc., a subsidiary of the company.
(4) The Company issued as compensation 1,676,429 shares with a closing market
price on the date of issue of $0.08 per share.
(5) The Company issued as compensation 1,229,643 shares with a closing market
price on the date of issue of $0.08 per share.
(6) The Company issued as compensation 1,000,000 shares with a closing market
price on the date of issue of $0.10 per share and 300,000 shares with a closing
market price on the date of issue of $0.32 per share.
Employment Agreements
In June 1999, the Company entered into an employment agreement with
Patrick Cody Morgan. The contract is for a term of three years at an annual
salary of $250,000 beginning on March 1, 2000 and may be terminated at any time
for cause or good reason, as defined in the agreement.
In June 1999, the Company entered into an employment agreement with
Majed Jalali. The contract is for a term of three years at an annual salary of
$325,000 beginning on March 1, 2000 and may be terminated at any time for cause
or good reason, as defined in the agreement.
Restricted Stock Issuances
In February 1999, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted
common stock to Cactus Petroleum, Inc., an entity controlled by John B. Hayes, a
former Director of the Company, as consideration for services provided pursuant
to an agreement with Optima Investments, Inc. in connection with the private
placement of securities under Rule 504 of Regulation D offering. Mr. Hayes
assisted in the identification, negotiation, and closing of the transaction with
Optima.
In April 1999, the Company issued 1,676,429 and 1,229,643 shares of
restricted common stock to Ken Honeyman and Howard Wilson, respectively, as
consideration for accrued compensation for past services rendered. Mr. Honeyman
and Mr. Wilson had each verbally agreed to forego any cash compensation up to
the date of issuance for their services as chief executive officer and
secretary, respectively, in exchange for the shares.
17
<PAGE>
In July 1999, the Company issued 300,000 shares of restricted common
stock to John B. Hayes as consideration for accrued compensation for past
services rendered. Mr. Hayes had verbally agreed to forego any cash compensation
up to the date of issuance for services rendered as president of the oil and gas
division of Lakota Energy, Inc., and subsequently as president of Lakota Oil and
Gas, Inc.
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The following table presents information regarding the beneficial
ownership of all shares of the common stock at March 3, 2000 by:
-- each person who owns beneficially more than five percent of
the outstanding shares of the common stock;
-- each director of the Company;
-- each named executive officer of the Company; and
-- all named executive officers and directors as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Address of Number of shares
Beneficial Owner of Common Stock Percent of Class
---------------- --------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
R. K. Honeyman (1) 3,606,429 5.7
Howard N. Wilson (1) 1,329,643 2.1
John B. Hayes (1) 1,300,000 2.1
Majed Jalali (1) 3,000,000 4.7
Patrick Cody Morgan (1)(2) 2,000,000 3.2
Dipak Bhatt (2)(3) 4,200,000 6.6
4107 Vaughn Creek Court
Sugar Land, Texas 77479
All officers and directors as a group 11,236,072 17.7
</TABLE>
(1) The address for each of these shareholders is c/o 2-Infinity.com, Inc., 4828
Loop Central Drive, Suite 150, Houston, Texas 77081.
(2) Includes shares held as joint tenants with spouse, or directly in spouse's
name.
(3) Includes warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common
stock, 1,250,000 of which are exercisable until November 30, 2000 at $0.15 per
share and 750,000 of which are exercisable until December 22, 2000 at $0.20 per
share.
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
In February 1999, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted
common stock to an entity controlled by the president of Lakota Oil as
consideration for services valued at $100,000 related to the negotiation and
consummation of a transaction with an oil and gas project.
In January and February 2000, the Company mutually separated from three
officers and directors, its CEO, CFO and the president of Lakota Oil. Included
in the settlement agreements with the former CEO, the company issued 4,000,000
shares and $100,000 to compensate him for the past service and the company paid
$40,000 for execution of the settlement agreement and consulting services during
the transition to new management. Each party mutually discharge any indebtedness
owed to the other and Cam Am Resources, Inc, a related party of the CEO. As a
result, the Company has accrued at December 31, 1999, $500,000 for compensation
of past services at the fair market value of the shares and the cash issued as a
result of this agreement. In addition, included in the settlement agreements
with the former CFO and the former President of Lakota Oil, the Company issued
an aggregate of 5,500,000 shares and $100,000 to compensate them for past
services and the company paid aggregate of $65,000 for the execution of the
agreements and consulting services during the transition to new management. As a
result, the Company has accrued at December 31, 1999 $2,760,500 of compensation
expense at the fair market value of the shares and cash issued as a result of
these agreements.
Effective August 1, 1999, the Company approved and implemented the
Omnibus Stock Option Plan ("the Plan") and the board of directors granted
2,000,000 options
18
<PAGE>
to purchase the Company's common stock under the plan. In January 1999, the
options granted under the plan were cancelled as part of the settlement and
separation agreements with the option holders and the Plan was terminated.
In June 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares at
$.38 per share of restricted common stock to Majed Jalali, the sole shareholder
of 2-Infinity-Texas, pursuant to the acquisition agreement between the Company
and Jalali.
In June 1999, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares at
$.32 per share of restricted common stock to Patrick Cody Morgan and Candus
Morgan in connection with the acquisition of AirNexus (formerly Voice Design,
Inc.)
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(A) Exhibits.
2.1* Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated November 6, 1996 between
Lakota Energy, Inc. and Chancellor Trading Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
2.2* Reorganization and Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 28, 1999
between Lakota Energy, Inc., 2-Inifinity.com, Inc., and Majed
Jalali (incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement
on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
2.3* Reorganization and Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 8, 1999
between Lakota Energy, Inc. and Voice Design, Inc. and its
shareholders (incorporated by reference from the Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No.
333-88575)).
2.4* Stock Transfer Agreement dated June 14, 1999 between Lakota Energy,
Inc. and Lakota Oil and Gas, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575)).
3.1* Articles of Incorporation of Chancellor Trading Group, Inc. filed
July 14, 1995 (incorporated by reference from the Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No.
333-88575)).
3.2* Articles of Merger between Lakota Energy, Inc. and Chancellor
Trading Group, Inc. filed December 27, 1996 (incorporated by
reference from the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota
Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
3.3* Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Lakota
Energy, Inc. filed August 4, 1999 (incorporated by reference from
the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575)).
3.4* Bylaws of Lakota Energy, Inc., as amended (incorporated by
reference from the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota
Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
3.5* Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Lakota
Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000).
10.1* Oil and Gas Lease dated October 21, 1995 (incorporated by reference
from the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.2* Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease dated March 15, 1996
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
19
<PAGE>
10.3* Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease dated April 26, 1996.
10.4* Employment Agreement between 2-Infinity.com, Inc. and Majed Jalali
effective June 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference from the
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.5* Employment Agreement between Voice Design, Inc. and Patrick Cody
Morgan effective June 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference from the
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.6* Promissory Note payable to Paras Chokshi dated February 12, 1999
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.7* Promissory Note payable to Dipak Bhatt dated February 12, 1999
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.8* Tut Systems, Inc. Value Added Reseller Agreement dated May 20, 1999
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.9* Warrant executed in favor of Dipak Bhatt to purchase 1,250,000
shares, expiring November 30, 2000 (incorporated by reference from
the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.10* Warrant executed in favor of Dipak Bhatt to purchase 750,000
shares, expiring December 22, 2000 (incorporated by reference from
the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of Lakota Technologies
(Registration No. 333-88575))
10.11* Warrant executed in favor of Michael A. Hancock and Steven D.
Morrison to purchase 500,000 shares, expiring December 10, 2000
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.12* Warrant executed in favor of Michael A. Hancock and Steven D.
Morrison to purchase 250,000 shares, expiring December 17, 2000
(incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 of Lakota Technologies (Registration No. 333-88575)).
10.13** Letter Agreement and Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2000 between Lakota Technologies, Inc. and Majed Jalali.
10.14** Letter Agreement and Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2000 between Lakota Technologies, Inc. and Patrick Cody
Morgan.
10.15** Voice Solutions Reseller Agreement dated as of November 23, 1999,
between 3Com Corporation and Air Nexus, Inc.
10.16** Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Assets dated as of March 22,
2000, between 2-Infinity.com, Inc. and Afaneh, Inc.
10.17* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Jason
Miller, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.18* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Andrea
Gonzales, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.19* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Sherri
20
<PAGE>
Mercer, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.20* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and David
Marron, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.21* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Nick
Escobedo, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.22* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Mike
Virata, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.6 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.23* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Cody
Morgan, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.7 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.24* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Majed
Jalali, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.25* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Candus
Morgan, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.9 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.26* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Charlie
Downey, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.27* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and David
Bodie, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.11 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.28* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Kelly
Nispel, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.12 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
10.29* Restricted Stock Award Agreement Between 2-Infinity.com and Ahmed
Alumran, dated April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.13 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-38304)).
23.1 Consent of Jones, Jensen & Company, Certified Public Accountants
27 Financial Data Schedule
---------------------
* Incorporated by reference as indicated
** Previously Filed
(B) Reports on From 8-K.
None.
21
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
2-INFINITY.COM, INC.
Dated June 21, 2000
By: /s/ Majed Jalali
-------------------------
Name: Majed Jalali
Title: President and
Chief Executive Officer
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
on June 20, 2000 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Majed Jalali Chairman, President and Chief June 21, 2000
---------------------------- Executive Officer (principal
Majed Jalali executive officer)
/s/ Patrick Cody Morgan Chief Operating Officer and Director June 21, 2000
---------------------------
Patrick Cody Morgan
/s/ Kelly Nispel Chief Financial Officer, June 21, 2000
--------------------------- Treasurer and Director (principal
accounting and financial officer)
Kelly Nispel
/s/ Scott E. Smith Director June 21, 2000
----------------------------
Scott E. Smith
/s/ Michael L. Omer Director June 21, 2000
-----------------------------
Michael L. Omer
</TABLE>
22
