<PAGE> 1
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _____
Commission file number 333-90709-04
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC
---------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 34-1902647
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
3770 Embassy Parkway, Akron, Ohio 44333-8367
--------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(330) 670-3000
--------------
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
----
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
----
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No X
---- ----
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-X is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. X
---
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common
stock as of May 5, 2000 was as follows: AS OF MAY 5, 2000, THERE WERE
1,100 CLASS A UNITS OF MEMBERS' INTEREST. 1,000 CLASS B UNITS OF MEMBERS'
INTEREST AND 30,000 CLASS C UNITS OF MEMBERS' INTEREST OUTSTANDING.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
----
<PAGE> 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM PAGE
- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
1. Business 3
2. Properties 17
3. Legal Proceedings 18
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 18
5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters 18
6. Selected Financial Data 19
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 19
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 27
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 27
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 27
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 29
11. Executive Compensation 32
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 33
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 36
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 41
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Operations for the Periods from August 13, 1999 to
December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the Years Ended December
31, 1998 and 1997 50
Consolidated/Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 51
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Members' Interest/Stockholders' Deficit for the
Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, the Period from January 1, 1999 to August
12, 1999 and the Period from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999 53
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Periods from August 13, 1999 to
December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the Years Ended December
31, 1998 and 1997 54
Notes to Consolidated/Combined Financial Statements for the Periods from August 13,
1999 to December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the Years
Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 55
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
As used herein, "SBQ steel products" includes high quality engineered steel rod
products as well as special bar quality steel products.
Republic Technologies International Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, and its subsidiaries ("RTI", or the "Company"), produce and market
special bar quality ("SBQ") steel products. SBQ steel products are high quality
hot-rolled and cold-finished carbon and alloy steel bars and rods used primarily
in critical applications in the automotive and industrial equipment industries.
The Company supplies a diverse customer base that includes leading automobile
and industrial equipment manufacturers and their first tier suppliers.
The Company was formed in a combination completed on August 13, 1999 (the
"Combination"). The Combination was completed through a series of mergers, asset
transfers and related steps as set forth in a Master Restructuring Agreement
among Bar Technologies Inc. ("BarTech"), Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.
("Republic"), USS/Kobe Steel Company and various of their affiliates. Following
the Combination, RTI, a newly formed legal entity, indirectly owns and operates
all of the assets of BarTech, Republic and USS/Kobe Steel Company's SBQ steel
products business ("USS/Kobe").
BarTech was formed in September 1994 with the assistance of affiliates of The
Veritas Capital Fund L.P. ("Veritas") to acquire and restart specific melt shop
and hot-rolling assets of the former Bar, Rod and Wire Division of Bethlehem
Steel Corporation. In April 1996, Blackstone Capital Partners II Merchant
Banking Fund L.P. ("Blackstone") acquired control of BarTech concurrently with
BarTech's acquisition of Bliss and Laughlin Industries, Inc. ("BLI"), one of the
largest processors of cold-finished SBQ steel in North America. Republic was a
leading U.S. manufacturer of SBQ steel products which was formed in 1989 to own
and operate the former assets of the Bar Division of LTV Steel Company, Inc. In
September 1998, Blackstone and other investors acquired control of Republic
through RES Holding Corporation with the intention of combining it with BarTech.
USS/Kobe was the SBQ steel production facilities and related operations division
of USS/Kobe Steel Company, a 50/50 joint venture formed in July 1989 between
subsidiaries of USX Corporation ("USX"), and Kobe Steel, Ltd. ("Kobe").
BUSINESS
The production of SBQ steel products is a segment of the overall steel market.
The SBQ bar products segment is further divided into three categories which are
delineated by the quality and the end use of the bar product: (1) reinforcing
bar, (2) merchant quality bar and, (3) hot-rolled engineered bar. Hot-rolled
engineered bar is the highest quality segment of the bar product market. The
Company produces various grades and sizes of finished hot-rolled engineered bar
and rod products. The Company intends to operate in the higher quality end of
the hot-rolled engineered bar and rod market. SBQ steel products sell for higher
prices per net ton than merchant or commodity grade steel products as they
generally contain more alloys than merchant and commodity grade products and are
sold to customers who require precise metallurgical content and compliance with
rigorous quality specifications.
The following table sets forth the Company's net tons shipped, on a proforma
basis, for our principal product lines for the years ended December 31, 1999 and
1998 (in 000s):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
1998 1999
------------------ -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net tons shipped:
SBQ hot-rolled products 1,776 60% 1,674 65%
SBQ cold-finished products 486 17 439 17
Seamless rounds 552 19 362 14
Semi-finished steel products 128 4 103 4
--------- -------- ---------- --------
Total net tons shipped 2,942 100% 2,578 100%
========= ======== ========== ========
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE> 4
The following describes the Company's business by its principal product lines.
Hot-Rolled Products. The Company's hot-rolled products are manufactured from
steel or iron melted in its steel production facilities, which is cast into
blooms or direct cast into billets and then hot-rolled into bar or rod in a
variety of sizes and product shapes. As a direct cast billet or bloom cast
billet is reduced in size at the hot-rolling mills, the strength and integrity
of the resulting bar or rod product is increased. Because blooms have a larger
cross-sectional area than billets, a greater reduction to size occurs.
Accordingly, a hot-rolled product rolled from a bloom cast billet is generally
stronger than a direct cast billet hot-rolled product of the same size and
metallurgical content. Typically customers concerned about product quality and
strength as related to reduction of area require bloom-based hot-rolled bar
products.
Direct cast billet products are generally used for smaller SBQ product sizes and
for less demanding end-use applications. The Company's Canton, Ohio CAST-ROLL
and Lorain, Ohio melt shop facilities cast bloom-based products in a 10" by 13"
or 12.5" by 14" size and have approximately 2.4 million tons of aggregate annual
bloom capacity. The Johnstown, Pennsylvania facility produces direct cast
billet-based products in a 6 3/4" by 6 3/4" size and has .77 million tons of
annual billet capacity.
The following table displays the major end-market applications of the Company's
hot-rolled products by size and shape:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MAJOR END-MARKET APPLICATIONS BY PRODUCT SIZES AND SHAPES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rounds Squares Hexagons
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
7/32"-3/4"
Auto fasteners Not Applicable Hose couplings
Tire cord Converters
Specialty springs
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3/4"-3 1/4"
Bearings Not Applicable Hose couplings
Spindles Converters
Steering columns
Gears
Constant velocity joints
Hubs
Axles
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 1/4"+
Crankshafts Off-highway equipment Not Applicable
Axles Agricultural equipment
Hydraulic cylinders Converters
Machine parts
Converters
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Cold-Finished Products. The Company's cold-finished products are manufactured
from hot-rolled bars or rods that are processed further to achieve superior
straightness, tolerance, finish and mechanical properties.
The following table displays the major end market applications of the Company's
cold-finished products by shape without references to product size, which is
less important for determining the end use of cold-finished steel products:
4
<PAGE> 5
MAJOR END MARKET APPLICATIONS BY SHAPES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROUNDS HEXAGONS SQUARES FLATS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Constant velocity joints Hose fittings Agricultural Machine tool fixtures
Hydraulic hose couplings Spark plug shells equipment Office furniture
Steering rack gears Nuts Exercise equipment
Fractional horsepower motor shafts Agricultural equipment
Engine valves and fuel injector parts
Hydraulic cylinders for off-highway
and agricultural equipment
Shafts and gears for appliance
industry
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Seamless Tube Rounds. In connection with a supply agreement with USX and the
Lorain Tubular Company ("Lorain Tubular"), RTI produces semi-finished rounds at
its Lorain, Ohio facility for purchase by Lorain Tubular and by USX's Fairfield,
Alabama facility under specified circumstances. Depending on the desired end-use
application for Lorain Tubular, these products are either cast to sizes of
10.5", 12.25" or 13.5" or cast to size and then rolled at the Company's primary
rolling mill to sizes of 6" or 10.5". For the Fairfield facility, the Company
produces semi-finished product in rounds at 11.6". Seamless tubes are used in
oil and gas drilling and exploration applications. For a description of the
rounds supply agreement see Item 13 - "Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions".
Semi-Finished Steel Products. In addition to RTI's hot-rolled and cold-finished
products and seamless tube rounds, the Company sells semi-finished products
produced by its melt shop casters which have not been processed further at its
rolling mill facilities. These products are typically sold to rolling mills
operated by competitors which do not have melt shop facilities or to steel
service centers or distributors, for further processing before they reach the
ultimate end user. These products are sold in sizes ranging from 5"-14".
The Company reports in two segments: hot-rolled products and cold-finished
products. Seamless tube rounds and semi-finished steel products are included in
the hot-rolled segment.
The Company has a third segment, the specialty steel segment, that is reported
as a discontinued operation. RTI intends to sell its specialty steel division.
The Company currently has a letter of intent with Haynes Specialty Steels
Company, a subsidiary of Haynes International, Inc. ("Haynes") to sell this
segment. For further information see "Note 16-Discontinued Operations".
THE STEEL MANUFACTURING PROCESS
The manufacturing process for the Company's hot-rolled and cold-finished SBQ
steel products involves a number of steps that are outlined below.
Melting. The Company's production of steel begins at its two electric furnace
melt shops in Canton, Ohio and Johnstown, Pennsylvania and its blast furnaces in
Lorain, Ohio. The Canton and Johnstown melt shops operate electric arc furnaces,
which consume ferrous scrap as the primary raw material. At both facilities,
premium grade steel scrap is transported from a scrap yard to the facility's
melt shop, where it is melted in two 220-ton electric arc furnaces at the
Canton, Ohio facility or one of two 180-ton electric arc furnaces at the
Johnstown, Pennsylvania facility. After the scrap reaches a molten state, it is
poured from the furnace into ladles and further processed in a ladle refining
furnace, where alloys, carbon and other materials are added to create the
desired chemical, metallurgical and physical properties. During the scrap
melting and refining process, impurities are removed from the molten steel. In
addition, as part of the refining process, the molten steel is further processed
in a vacuum degasser, which removes oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen to produce a
clean, high-quality steel.
5
<PAGE> 6
At the Company's Canton, Ohio facility, the molten steel is introduced to its
CAST-ROLL process in which molten steel is poured into a four-strand continuous
bloom caster, solidified in molds and cut into blooms and billets in a single
continuous process. At the Johnstown, Pennsylvania facility, the molten steel is
poured into a five-strand continuous caster to be solidified and rolled into
billets. These semi-finished blooms and billets, having been produced to a
specified chemical composition, size and quality, are then cooled and sent to
the Company's rolling mills for further processing into finished products or
sold as semi-finished products.
Unlike the Company's electric furnace melt shops that rely on steel scrap, its
Lorain, Ohio facility produces iron in a blast furnace, and then converts the
iron to steel in a basic oxygen furnace by adding scrap. The primary raw
materials used in the Company's blast furnace are (1) taconite pellets, which
are a concentrated form of iron ore, (2) coke, which is a product produced by
baking specific types of coal at high temperature, and (3) limestone or other
cleansing materials, which are necessary to remove impurities in the material.
In addition, scrap material is often used in place of iron ore and pulverized
coal is often used in place of coke. The taconite pellets and coke are purchased
by the Company from USX Corporation pursuant to long-term supply agreements and
the other materials are either produced at the facility or purchased from third
parties. See Item 13 -- Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions-Agreements with USX Corporation and Kobe Steel, Ltd. and their
Affiliates.
The Company operates two blast furnaces at its Lorain facility. Within the
refractory brick-lined blast furnace chamber, the iron material consisting of
taconite or other ores, the carbon material consisting of coke and pulverized
coal and the cleansing or "flux" material are heated to temperatures in excess
of 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. The high temperature causes a chemical reaction
between the iron and carbon creating pig iron or hot metal. The flux material
combines with impurities to create a by-product called slag.
The pig iron is then transferred in liquid form by special rail vehicles to the
Lorain melt shop, which operates two 220-ton basic oxygen furnaces. Sulfur is
removed from the hot metal and the hot metal is mixed with high quality scrap.
This mixture is injected with oxygen that causes another chemical reaction that
converts the pig iron or hot metal into molten steel, which is then poured into
ladles. The ladles are transported to a ladle metallurgy facility where alloying
agents and other refining materials may be added and blended into the steel. In
addition, for some applications, the molten steel may be processed in a vacuum
degasser to reduce oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen.
The molten steel is then poured into a five-strand continuous bloom caster
through which the steel flows and cools. The cooled material solidifies and then
is cut into blooms. The caster produces large diameter round blooms that are
feedstock for hot-rolled large diameter seamless tube products or rectangular
blooms that are transported to a mill that converts the blooms into billets to
be used as feedstock for hot-rolled bar and rod, or into smaller diameter
semi-finished rounds to be used as feedstock for hot-rolled smaller diameter
seamless tube products.
Hot-Rolling. At the Company's hot-rolling mills, the blooms and billets are
processed into hot-rolled products by changing the internal physical properties,
size and shape of the steel. Blooms and billets are first reheated, then rolled
through up to 22 mill stands, which form the blooms and billets into the desired
dimensions and sizes for the Company's hot-rolled SBQ steel products. The
heated, finished hot-rolled products are coiled or are placed on a cooling bed
and then cut into required lengths. The hot-rolled products are then stacked
into coils or bundles and placed in warehouses from which they are shipped
directly to the customer or to one of the Company's cold-finishing mills for
further processing.
Cold-Finishing. The Company produces its cold-finished SBQ steel products by
improving the physical properties of hot-rolled products through value-added
processes at its cold-finishing plants. Cold-finishing processes produce
products with more precise size and straightness tolerances as well as a surface
finish that provide customers with a more efficient means of producing a number
of end products by often eliminating the first processing step in the customer's
process. The four basic cold-finishing processes are the following:
6
<PAGE> 7
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Cold Drawing..................... Hot-rolled products that have been descaled by blasting the
surface with hardened steel shot or pickling with acid are
(1) drawn or pulled through a
tungsten carbide die, which
compresses the surface,
elongates the product and makes
it smooth and shiny and (2)
straightened.
Turning and Polishing............ Removing the surface of hot-rolled products with a
revolving cutting tool, which is
the turning process, then rotating
the turned product through rollers
that polish the surface and
straighten the product.
Turning, Grinding and
Polishing........................ The same processes as turning and polishing products, with
the addition of a grinding process that yields very fine
tolerances.
Drawing, Turning,
Grinding and
Polishing...................... The same processes as turning, grinding and polishing
products, with the addition of a drawing process to add
physical strength.
</TABLE>
After the cold-finished products are cut to length, they are stacked in bundles
and transported to warehouses from which they are shipped to customers.
SEASONALITY
The Company's business is subject to some degree of seasonality. The primary end
markets for the Company's products are the automotive and industrial equipment
industries. Consequently, the SBQ industry, including the Company, typically
experiences higher shipment volumes and revenues in the third and fourth
quarters due to seasonality of the automotive and industrial equipment
industries.
RAW MATERIALS
Scrap Metal. The major raw material for the Company's electric arc furnace melt
shops is ferrous scrap metal, which is generated principally from industrial,
automotive, demolition and railroad sources. The long-term demand for scrap
metal and the importance of scrap metal to the domestic steel industry is
expected to increase as steelmakers continue to expand scrap metal-based
electric furnace capacity, with additions to, or replacements of, existing
integrated steel manufacturing facilities that use iron ore, coke and limestone
as their principal raw materials. The high quality of RTI's products requires
the use of premium grades of scrap metal, the supply of which is more limited.
Prices for scrap metal vary based on numerous factors including quality,
availability, freight costs, speculation by scrap brokers and other conditions
beyond the Company's control. However, the Company generally has not had
difficulty purchasing adequate scrap metal of the required quality. The Company
believes that adequate supplies of scrap metal will continue to be available in
sufficient quantities for the foreseeable future. In the future, the Company
expects to purchase scrap in the open market through a number of brokers and
dealers or by direct purchase.
The Company seeks to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in the price of scrap
metal by charging where possible scrap metal surcharges based on the increase in
the price of scrap metal above specified levels. For other customers,
adjustments are made in selling prices if the price of scrap exceeds or drops
below specified levels. These surcharges and price adjustments are determined on
a monthly or quarterly basis.
7
<PAGE> 8
Coke and Iron Ore Pellets. Iron ore pellets and coke are the principal raw
materials used in the Company's blast furnaces. RTI has entered into long term
sourcing agreements with USX who will supply the iron ore pellets and coke that
are the raw material inputs for the blast furnace/ basic oxygen process route at
its Lorain, Ohio facility. The Company expects that these agreements will
provide the Company, during the term of the contracts, with a consistent supply
of quality materials to RTI in the future at prices that will be favorable as
compared to market prices due to the "most favorable nations" pricing terms in
the agreement, which guarantees the Company a price matching the lowest price
offered by USX. For additional information on the iron ore pellets and coke
supply agreement, see Item 13 - "Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions".
Coal. The Lorain, Ohio blast furnace injects pulverized coal into the blast
furnace to offset its use of higher priced metallurgical coke and reduce the
material cost for hot-metal production. This coal is pulverized and delivered to
the Lorain facility under a long-term tolling agreement with Ohio Edison Power
Company. The price over the life of the agreement is fixed.
Alloys and Fluxes. Additionally, the Company purchases various materials such as
nickel, chrome, molybdenum, vanadium, manganese, silicon, aluminum, titanium,
sulphur, lead, lime and fluorspar for use as alloying agents and fluxing, or
cleansing, materials. Historically, prices of many of these materials have
fluctuated dramatically.
Semi-Finished Billets and Hot-Rolled Bars. Historically, the Company has
purchased semi-finished billets from other steelmakers for use in production at
its hot-rolling mills. The Company purchases from several suppliers and expects
that grades of semi-finished billets that it chooses not to produce will be
available for purchase.
In addition, the Company has previously purchased a portion of its hot-rolled
bar requirements for its cold-finishing operations from third-party suppliers.
During the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, approximately 70% and 55%,
respectively, of its cold-finished bar and rod production used internally
produced hot-rolled products.
ENERGY SOURCES
The Company's manufacturing facilities consume large amounts of electricity and
natural gas. RTI has not had difficulty in obtaining adequate sources of
electricity and natural gas in the past and does not foresee any significant
difficulties in the future.
The Company's primary use of electricity is at its electric arc furnace melt
shop facilities in Canton, Ohio and Johnstown, Pennsylvania and at its blast
furnace melt shop facility in Lorain, Ohio, which uses less electric power than
the electric arc furnaces. RTI currently has long-term electricity contracts in
place at each of these facilities, with the Canton, Ohio agreement expiring in
2000, the Johnstown, Pennsylvania agreement expiring in 2002 and the Lorain,
Ohio agreement running until 2004. The rest of its facilities purchase their
electricity from local utilities under various contracts and terms. The Company
believes that its electricity costs are competitive with other steel
manufacturers.
In connection with the Combination, RTI entered into an agreement with
FirstEnergy Services Corp. ("FirstEnergy") under which it appointed FirstEnergy
as its exclusive representative for the procurement of energy supply and
services. As a result of this arrangement, the Company expects that it is likely
that much of its energy purchasing requirements will eventually be filled by
FirstEnergy. For additional information on this arrangement see Item 13 -
"Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions".
The principal use of natural gas in the Company's operations is for the billet
reheating operations at its Lorain, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; Lackawanna, New York and
Massillon, Ohio hot-rolling mills and at the blast furnace and primary mill at
its Lorain, Ohio melt shop facility. The Company has negotiated distribution
contracts, storage contracts, primary firm transportation contracts and
secondary firm transportation contracts where necessary for cost effective,
reliable natural gas deliveries. The Company has also negotiated gas purchase
contracts with dependable supplies that are NYMEX based. Each facilities
delivery arrangement is negotiated separately for the specific needs of that
facility. The Company purchases future NYMEX contracts on a twelve to eighteen
month basis according to its business plan and hedging strategy.
8
<PAGE> 9
CUSTOMERS
The Company primarily markets its products to consumers of higher quality,
critical application SBQ steel products. Customers in these targeted market
segments require higher quality SBQ steel products for use in hot and cold
metal-forming operations such as cold forge/extrusion, warm forge, hot forge and
hot/cold heading processes, rather than traditional machining processes.
Penetration of these targeted market segments is dependent upon various factors,
including the ability to achieve precise chemistry and manufacturing tolerances.
Additionally, producers must meet pre-qualification requirements to become
approved suppliers for potential customers.
For customers in the automobile manufacturing industry and their suppliers, the
most important form of certification is the Quality System Requirement standard,
or "QS-9000" certification, which is a quality system standard established by
the Chrysler, Ford and General Motors Quality Requirement Task Force, which sets
forth a standard set of quality requirements for components and materials
suppliers to the automotive industry. Certification requirements vary in scope
and generally take between three and twelve months for a supplier to achieve.
Frequently, the qualification process requires a producer to supply one or more
trial heats of SBQ steel products for customer evaluation, although some
customers have longer pre-qualification requirements. Because of the high costs
incurred by suppliers and customers and significant time that may be required to
obtain qualifications, the qualification processes can create strong bonds and
commitments between suppliers and customers.
Most of the Company's facilities have satisfied all major pre-qualification
requirements, including QS-9000. All of its facilities have received QS-9000
certifications.
In 1999 the Company's five largest customers accounted for 25.7% of its total
net sales. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of its total sales.
DISTRIBUTION
The Company markets its SBQ steel products through a staff of professional sales
representatives and sales technicians located in the major manufacturing centers
of the Midwest, Great Lakes, and Southeast regions of the United States and
Canada, as well as utilizing independent sales agents to cover some areas in
states in the South and on the West Coast of the United States.
The Company's facilities are strategically located to serve the majority of
consumers of SBQ steel products in the United States and Canada. The Company
ships products between its mills and finished products to its customers by rail
and truck. Customer needs and location dictate the type of transportation
utilized by the Company for deliveries. The proximity of the Company's rolling
mills and cold-finishing plants to its customers allows it to provide
competitive rail and truck freight rates and flexible deliveries in order to
satisfy just-in-time and other customer manufacturing requirements. The Company
believes that the ability to meet the product delivery requirements of its
customers in a timely and flexible fashion is a key to attracting and retaining
customers as more and more SBQ steel product consumers reduce their in-plant raw
material inventory. The Company plans to optimize freight costs by using its
significantly greater scale of operations to negotiate more favorable
transportation arrangements, continuing to combine orders in shipments whenever
possible and utilizing "backhauling" of scrap and other raw materials.
9
<PAGE> 10
COMPETITION
The domestic steel industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with
other SBQ steel producers including the following:
- integrated mills, which make steel by processing iron ore and other
raw materials in a blast furnace;
- mini-mills, which make steel by melting scrap metals in an electric
arc furnace; and
- merchant bar quality producers.
The Company's primary competition for its hot-rolled bar products are both large
domestic steelmakers and specialized mini-mills. Many of the large steelmakers
have greater financial resources and utilize modern technologies similar to some
of the equipment and processes currently in place at the Company. Numerous
competitors exist in the domestic cold-finishing market. There are over 20
cold-finishers in the domestic market at present. In addition, foreign
competition can be significant in segments of the SBQ steel market, particularly
where certifications are not required, and during periods when the U.S. dollar
is strong as compared with foreign currencies. This competition is exerting
significant downward pressure on the price level of some of the Company's
products.
The principal areas of competition in the Company's markets are product quality
and range, delivery reliability, service and price. SBQ steel products are
characterized by special chemistry and precise processing requirements.
Maintaining high standards of product quality while keeping production costs
competitive is essential to the Company's ability to compete in its markets.
Management believes that RTI has the widest selection of product grades and
sizes in the industry. The ability of a manufacturer to respond quickly to
customer orders currently is, and is expected to remain, important as customers
continue to reduce their in-plant raw material inventory.
BACKLOG
The Company calculates backlog as those orders received but not yet shipped. Its
combined backlog as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, was $297 million and $306
million on a proforma basis, respectively. Orders are generally filled within 3
to 14 weeks of the order depending on the product, customer needs and other
production requirements. Customer orders are generally cancelable without
penalty prior to finish size rolling, and depend on customers' changing
production schedules. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that the amount
of backlog orders is a reliable indication of future sales.
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES
The Company has the patents, trademarks and trade names necessary for the
operation of its business as now conducted. The loss of any or all of these
patents, trademarks and trade names would not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business. However, in recognition of these trademarks in the
marketplace, the Company considers these intellectual property rights important
to its business and intends to actively defend and enforce them as necessary.
EMPLOYEES
In connection with the acquisition of Republic by RES Holding Corporation in
September 1998, the Company entered into a new Master Collective Bargaining
Agreement covering all former Republic and BarTech facilities with employees
represented by the United Steelworkers of America ("USWA") and replaced the
existing collective bargaining agreements with the USWA, other than selected
plant-specific agreements. In connection with the Combination, the scope of the
same Master Collective Bargaining Agreement was extended to cover the former
USS/Kobe Lorain, Ohio facility. This new labor agreement expires on October 31,
2003.
The vast majority of RTI's production workers are covered by the new collective
bargaining agreement with the USWA.
10
<PAGE> 11
Production employees at the Company's Cartersville, Georgia facility are not
represented by a union. RTI had 5,019 employees at December 31, 1999, including
946 salaried employees.
The new labor agreement provides for formalized workplace flexibility and
consolidation of job classifications at the Company's facilities. Under the new
labor agreement, the USWA has agreed to eliminate many practices, which in the
past restricted workplace flexibility and led to inefficiencies. RTI and the
USWA have also agreed to reduce the number of job classifications at all covered
facilities to five from over thirty-four. This reduction will enable RTI to
assign a greater number of responsibilities to individual employees.
RTI and the USWA have agreed under the new labor agreement that the USWA will be
granted "partnership" rights in the management of the company. These
"partnership" rights afford access to the Company's decision-making processes
through the formation of leadership and advisory committees containing members
of management and USWA representatives. Additionally, the USWA has the right to
appoint one director to the Board of Directors of Republic Technologies
International, Inc. ("RTI, Inc."), the Company's parent company, as agreed to by
the USWA and RTI.
The new labor agreement provides for voluntary early retirement buyouts and a
voluntary severance plan applicable to all former Republic facilities with
employees represented by the USWA and the former USS/Kobe facilities, for the
purpose of permanently reducing the net number of hourly employees represented
by the USWA at these facilities by over 1,700 from the date of the new labor
agreement. In the event that the required headcount reductions are not achieved
through the early retirement buyout program and a voluntary severance plan, the
Company may layoff up to 300 employees. For additional information regarding the
expected cash costs associated with the early retirement buyout program and the
voluntary severance plan, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation - Liquidity and Capital Resources".
Wage and benefit provisions under this collective bargaining agreement are
specified until expiration of the agreement and will be subject to negotiations
at that time.
The new labor agreement also provides for improvements in the existing defined
benefit pension plans covering employees at former Republic facilities, former
USS/Kobe facilities and the former BLI Harvey, Illinois facility, and the
creation of defined benefit plan obligations covering employees at former
BarTech's facilities. The existing defined benefit pension plans may be
consolidated into one defined benefit pension plan in the future, which will
contain terms found in traditional steel industry defined benefit pension plans.
For additional information regarding the anticipated pension costs associated
with the new labor agreement, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operation - Liquidity and Capital Resources".
Pursuant to the new labor agreement, the employees covered by the agreement are
expected to be offered the opportunity to purchase up to $15.0 million worth of
common stock of RTI, Inc. at a price per share equal to the effective price per
share paid by the investors for new shares they acquired in connection with the
Combination transactions. Pursuant to an agreement with the USWA, this offering
is to be accomplished on the earliest of (1) January 1, 2001, (2) immediately
preceding RTI proceeding with an initial public offering or (3) a change of
control. The new labor agreements contemplate that any shares sold will be
subject to customary restrictions on transfer and will have the benefit of
customary "piggyback" registration rights.
Finally, the new labor agreement also provides for management neutrality,
employment security for covered employees and various capital expenditures with
respect to the Company's new and existing facilities. The new labor agreement
also contemplates one-time payments to various USS/Kobe covered employees
expected to total approximately $3 million relating to signing bonuses and
employee equity interest obligations.
11
<PAGE> 12
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The domestic steel industry is subject to a broad range of environmental laws
and regulations, including those governing the following:
- - discharges into the air and water;
- - the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes;
- - the remediation of soil and groundwater contamination by petroleum
products or hazardous substances and wastes; and
- - the health and safety of its employees.
The Company continuously monitors its compliance with these environmental laws
and regulations and believes that it currently is in substantial compliance with
them. The Company anticipates that its expenditures for environmental control
measures during the next twenty-four months will be approximately $5.6 million.
As is the case with most steel producers, the Company could incur significant
costs related to environmental issues in the future, in particular those arising
from remediation costs for historical waste disposal practices at its
facilities. The Company currently believes that these costs are likely to be in
the range of $15.9 million to $25.5 million over the lives of the Company's
facilities although some third-party estimates are substantially higher. The
Company's reserve to cover probable environmental liabilities, including the
matters discussed below, was approximately $21.4 million as of December 31,
1999. In addition to the accrual amounts specifically discussed below, the $21.4
million also includes accruals of approximately $1 million relating to the
Company's voluntary program relating to the replacement of PCB-containing
transformers at its facilities, approximately $2.4 million relating to
additional environmental remediations anticipated in connection with the
Company's consolidation plan and $1.6 million relating to certain remaining
environmental matters which are not believed to be material and which are not
discussed below. The Company believes that it has no significant environmental
compliance and remediation costs with respect to the former BarTech's operations
and, accordingly, only three non-material reserve items have been established.
As of December 31, 1999, the Company had a reserve of $1.5 relating to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (the "U.S. EPA") "multimedia" audit which is
discussed below. Except as noted below, the Company is not otherwise aware of
any significant environmental compliance and remediation costs with respect to
the former USS/Kobe's operations for which the establishment of a reserve would
be appropriate. To the extent the Company incurs any such remediation costs,
these costs will most likely be incurred over a number of years; however, future
regulatory action regarding historical disposal practices at its facilities, as
well as continued compliance with environmental requirements, may require the
Company to incur significant costs that may have a material adverse effect on
its future financial performance.
The U.S. EPA has identified a number of solid waste management units, or
"SWMUs," at the Eighth Street facility in Canton, Ohio. On June 16, 1999, the
Company entered into an Administrative Consent Order with the U.S. EPA to
investigate these SWMUs and propose appropriate remedial measures. The "Berger
Triangle," a seven acre parcel of land the Company owns in Canton that is listed
on the U.S. EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Information System list of contaminated or potentially contaminated
sites, is also included within the scope of the Administrative Consent Order.
The Company anticipates that through the year 2004, it will spend approximately
$1.2 million to investigate the SWMUs and the Berger Triangle. The Company has
accrued approximately $4.6 million regarding these matters. However, the Company
is currently unable to predict precisely the amount or timing of the costs it
may be required to incur to remediate these sites, but the cost could be greater
than the amount currently accrued.
The electric arc furnace dust waste pile located at the Canton facility has been
exempted from the scope of the Administrative Consent Order discussed above.
However, on April 26, 1999, the Company entered into
12
<PAGE> 13
a Consent Decree with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (the "Ohio EPA")
providing for the closure in-place of that waste pile. The Company submitted a
draft closure plan to the Ohio EPA on July 2, 1999 which was approved on October
22, 1999. The Company originally anticipated initiating closure construction in
the Spring of the year 2000, but has had recent negotiations with the Ohio EPA
to defer this until 2001. The Company anticipates that the construction, which
would involve the placement of a 54 inch thick liner on top of the existing
pile, would involve expenditures of approximately $1 million. The Company
estimates that the cost of 30 years of post-closure monitoring and maintenance
of the closed waste pile would be an additional $1.1 million. RTI has accrued
approximately $2.1 million regarding the closure and post-closure care of the
waste pile.
Notices of historical waste disposal activities at one of the two Massillon,
Ohio facilities and the two Canton facilities were filed by LTV Steel and its
predecessors with the U.S. EPA, under Section 103(c) of the federal
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. In 1985,
the Ohio EPA recommended the Massillon plant as a medium priority for further
state investigation. The Ohio EPA also recommended the Harrison Avenue facility
in Canton as a medium priority for further state investigation and a low
priority for further federal investigation. No further investigation of
historical waste disposal activities has been performed at these facilities
since 1986 by any environmental authority. The Company could be required, in the
future, to incur significant costs to investigate such historical waste disposal
activities and remediate any contamination found to exist at these facilities.
RTI has accrued approximately $5.4 million regarding the Massillon facility.
However, the Company is currently unable to predict precisely the amount or
timing of such costs.
Through contractual agreements with Bethlehem Steel Corporation ("Bethlehem"),
the Company has sought to reduce the impact of costs arising from or related to
actual or potential environmental conditions at BarTech's facilities caused or
created by Bethlehem or BarTech's predecessors in title and attributable to the
period in which the Bethlehem Bar Rod and Wire Division or BarTech's
predecessors operated such facilities. Pursuant to such arrangements, Bethlehem
agreed to indemnify BarTech for such costs by limiting BarTech's potential
exposure to any such damages incurred (1) through December 1996, to 50% of the
first $2 million in damages, or $1 million, and (2) thereafter, to 50% of the
first $10 million of damages in the aggregate, or $5 million in total exposure.
Although several investigations of past or present environmental conditions at
the former BarTech's facilities have been conducted by or on behalf of Bethlehem
and regulatory agencies, the reports and results of which have been made
available to the Company, an in-depth, environmental review of the former
BarTech facilities to determine the potential scope, if any, of required
remediation at such facilities has not been conducted by or on the behalf of
BarTech or the Company. There can be no assurance that Bethlehem will meet its
obligations under the indemnification arrangements or that there will not be
future contamination for which the Company might be fully liable and that may
require it to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect
on its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Bethlehem is conducting remedial activities on a small portion of the
Lackawanna, New York facility historically used for mill scale storage, which
was identified as requiring corrective action by the U.S. EPA pursuant to an
Administrative Order on Consent issued to Bethlehem in 1990. Bethlehem is
currently awaiting approval of the Remedial Work Plan for the former mill scale
storage area submitted to the U.S. EPA in September 1994. Bethlehem is
ultimately liable for compliance with the Administrative Order on Consent and,
while no assurances can be given, the Company believes that Bethlehem is likely
to fulfill these obligations.
Some of the steel processing operations presently conducted by Bliss & Laughlin,
LLC ("Bliss & Laughlin") commenced over 100 years ago by predecessors of Bliss &
Laughlin and included properties which over the years were sold by Bliss &
Laughlin's predecessors. Given the nature and geographic diversity of its
current and its predecessors' former operations, it is possible that claims
would be asserted against Bliss & Laughlin in the future based upon the current
property ownership of Bliss & Laughlin and by operations of BarTech's
predecessors. Bliss & Laughlin has received an indemnification from the former
owner and operator of such properties for various environmental claims or
liabilities relating to activities at Bliss & Laughlin's Harvey and Batavia,
Illinois and Medina, Ohio properties prior to October 23, 1984, when Bliss &
Laughlin succeeded to ownership of such properties, and for various
environmental claims or
13
<PAGE> 14
liabilities relating to properties that were sold by Bliss & Laughlin's
predecessors. There can be no assurance that such former owner and operator will
meet its obligation under the indemnification agreements or that there will not
be future contamination for which the Company might be fully liable and that may
require it to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect
on its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Canadian Drawn Steel Company, Inc. ("CDSC"), is also subject to Canadian
federal, provincial, regional and municipal environmental laws and regulations.
The Company believes that it is currently in substantial compliance with
applicable environmental laws and regulations and does not anticipate any
material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in the
future. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be required
to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on its
business, results of operations or financial condition.
The Company, as successor to Republic, is a potentially responsible party
regarding one federal Superfund site at which it has disposed of waste. The
Bliss & Laughlin cold-finishing subsidiary is also a potentially responsible
party regarding its disposal of waste at two federal Superfund sites and at a
third site that is being remediated under authority of Ohio state law. USS/Kobe
is a potentially responsible party regarding one site being addressed by the
U.S. EPA. RTI has accrued approximately $0.3 million regarding these matters
and, while no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that the
liabilities relating to these sites will have a material adverse effect on its
business, results of operations or financial condition.
The Lorain, Ohio facility has been in continuous operation by the Company,
USS/Kobe, USX and its predecessors for over 100 years. Although the Company is
not aware of any material environmental issues at this facility other than those
described herein, it believes the long operational history of this facility
poses a significantly greater probability of some form of environmental
contamination than at its newer facilities. Costs or liabilities associated with
any contamination at this facility could be significant.
In connection with the formation of USS/Kobe Steel Company in 1989 by USX and
Kobe, USS/Kobe Steel Company obtained a limited indemnity from USX concerning
identified matters arising out of the past operation of the melt, bar and
tubular facilities at Lorain, Ohio by USX and its predecessors. The Company is
the beneficiary of a portion of this indemnity. The 1989 agreement relating to
the formation of USS/Kobe Steel Company divided environmental responsibility
into several different categories. The first category includes specific areas
and projects for which USX retained complete responsibility. USX retained all
responsibility relating to a hazardous waste landfill referred to as the D-2
Landfill, and for all disposal of waste materials prior to June 30, 1989 at
locations other than the Lorain property. The second category includes matters
that were split between USS/Kobe Steel Company and USX.
Two cost sharing baskets and one cost sharing percentage were agreed to by USX
and USS/Kobe Steel Company as well. One of the cost sharing baskets provides
that USS/Kobe Steel Company will be responsible for the first $10 million of
costs and USX will be responsible for costs above that amount incurred relating
to the areas formerly occupied by a coke plant and related facilities, a
sintering plant, and a galvanizing plant. USX and USS/Kobe Steel Company
subsequently agreed that USS/Kobe Steel Company could treat $3 million of its
expenses in demolishing the coke batteries as expenditures against this $10
million basket. The second cost sharing basket provides that USS/Kobe Steel
Company will be responsible for the first $9 million of costs related to 13
identified SWMUs that are generally classified as disposal sites. The percentage
cost sharing agreement provides that in the event of any groundwater
remediation, USS/Kobe Steel Company will pay 65% of the cost and USX will pay
35% of the cost. In each case, USX's obligation to indemnify is limited to
cleanup actions specifically required by government agencies.
Except for these specific indemnities and for specific projects that USX agreed
to complete, USS/Kobe Steel Company assumed responsibility for all environmental
conditions at the Lorain facility, including additional SWMUs at the facility
that were not included within the scope of the environmental cost sharing
provisions of the 1989 agreement contributing the Lorain facilities to USS/Kobe
Steel Company. Although environmental regulators have not required action
regarding the SWMUs at the Lorain facility, the Company could incur significant
investigation and remediation costs in the future. However, the Company
14
<PAGE> 15
is currently unable to predict precisely the amount or timing of the costs it
may be required to incur to investigate and remediate the SWMUs or other
potential areas of contamination.
Pursuant to the master restructuring agreement, which sets forth indemnification
and cost sharing arrangements regarding environmental liability at the Lorain,
Ohio facilities, the new tubular steel company owned by USX is responsible for
environmental liabilities relating to its operations and to the portions of the
real property at the Lorain site that it owns. As a general matter, the Company
will be responsible for environmental liabilities relating to its operations and
to the portions of the real property at the Lorain site that it owns. There can
be no assurance that USX will meet its obligations under the indemnification and
cost sharing arrangements in the master restructuring agreement or that there
will not be future identification of contamination at the facilities in Lorain,
Ohio for which the Company might be fully liable and that may require it to
incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on its
business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company and the U.S. EPA are parties to an April 1992 consent decree and an
April 1999 amendment to this consent decree concerning the blast furnaces at the
Lorain facility. Pursuant to the original consent decree, USS/Kobe Steel Company
paid a $500,000 penalty. The amended consent decree settled additional past
violations by payment of a $440,000 penalty, required the installation of new
continuous emission monitors, included a revised emission limit for carbon
monoxide and established interim emissions limits that will apply until a permit
modification establishing final emission limits is complete pursuant to the
amended consent decree.
USS/Kobe Steel Company was the subject of a "multimedia" audit by the U.S. EPA
beginning in 1997, which included an air, water and hazardous waste compliance
review. The final report and citations have not been issued, but a number of
citations and notices of violation have been issued as a result of the audit.
USS/Kobe Steel Company has already addressed many of the issues pointed out by
U.S. EPA. USS/Kobe Steel Company and the U.S. EPA have entered into a tolling
agreement concerning issuance of the final audit. On July 20, 1999, USS/Kobe
Steel Company had an initial meeting with the U.S. EPA regarding the multimedia
audit. At that time, the U.S. EPA proposed penalties related to alleged
violations of environmental laws addressing water, air and hazardous waste
issues and indicated that it would pursue the negotiation of a consent decree
with USS/Kobe Steel Company relating to the findings of the multimedia audit.
The Company has subsequently met with the U.S. EPA regarding these matters on
several occasions. It is possible that such a consent decree, if finalized, will
require penalties, further testing and mandatory and voluntary environmental
projects. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the final outcome of
the audit and the ongoing investigation, but it could result in litigation or
material penalties or other costs. Accordingly, and in light of the current
negotiations with the U.S. EPA, the Company has increased the reserve from $361
thousand at the time of the Combination to $1.5 million. Although the multimedia
audit is not generally the subject of an environmental indemnity, the Company
believes that penalties resulting from the multimedia audit, to the extent
relating to the steel tube facilities at the Lorain facility, would be under the
master restructuring agreement the responsibility of the new tubular steel joint
venture between USX and Kobe. To the extent that any penalties relate to
discharges of waste water from the D-2 Landfill, the Company believes those
penalties would be indemnified against by USX.
In August 1998, the U.S. EPA issued a notice of violation concerning emissions
from the Lorain, Ohio blast furnace casthouse and gas flare stack that allegedly
exceeded opacity limits. The U.S. EPA has stated that it will pursue these
matters as part of the multimedia enforcement action discussed above.
In July and November of 1998, the U.S. EPA issued Findings of Violation and
Order for Compliance alleging that USS/Kobe Steel Company violated its National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit by exceeding permit limits and
allowing unauthorized discharges. The Company believes that there have been a
small number of permit limit exceedences since January 1996 and that these
events are isolated incidents. The U.S. EPA has indicated an intention to pursue
these matters as part of the multimedia enforcement action discussed above.
In September 1998, the Ohio EPA issued a notice of violation regarding an oil
discharge from a storm sewer. USS/Kobe Steel Company remediated this discharge
and in April 1999 submitted to the agency a
15
<PAGE> 16
study that was required by the notice of violation. No response has been
received from the Ohio EPA concerning this matter.
In December 1992, the Ohio EPA issued a notice of potential violation alleging
that the storage of blast furnace flue dust constitutes unlawful disposal.
USS/Kobe Steel Company contests this characterization and in 1995 submitted to
Ohio EPA a revised waste management plan addressing this and other issues.
USS/Kobe Steel Company has not received a response from the agency. Based on
previous engineering estimates to conduct a self-directed closure of the area,
the Company has established a $2.5 million reserve.
The Bar and Pipe Mill Recycle System (the "BPMRS"), a component of the
wastewater treatment system at the Lorain, Ohio facility, is used by both the
Company's operations and the operations of the tubular steel company of USX.
Although the Company will be responsible for historical environmental
liabilities at the BPMRS, on an on-going basis the new tubular steel company and
the Company will share the cost of the continued operation of the BPMRS on a
basis proportionate to the amount of its respective discharges to that lagoon.
The Company is under no current obligation to upgrade or replace the BPMRS, and
it does not anticipate that it will do so within the next three years. However,
the Company does anticipate that a project to upgrade or replace the BPMRS will
occur after this period and the expense could be material to its business,
results of operation or financial condition. The new tubular steel company has
agreed that if it elects to continue to use the upgraded or replaced BPMRS, it
will bear a portion of the capital expense proportionate to the amount of its
discharge to the shared facility.
Various federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the
removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos containing materials, or
"ACMs." Such laws and regulations may impose liability for the release of ACMs
and may provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of
facilities at which ACMs were or are located for personal injury associated with
exposure to ACMs. The Company is aware of the presence of ACMs at its
facilities, but it believes that such materials are in acceptable condition at
this time. While no assurances can be given, the Company believes that any
future costs related to remediation of ACMs at these sites will not be material,
either on an individual basis or in the aggregate.
CONSOLIDATION PLAN
The Combination combines three businesses with a broad base of both
complementary and overlapping operations. The Company's consolidation plan
intends to create a more efficient, higher quality network of production
facilities operated by a smaller and more flexible workforce. This plan, as
originally conceived, contemplated a capital investment of approximately
$322 million to expand capacity, maximize operating efficiency and increase
value-added product processing. The Company's consolidation plan is currently
under review and full implementation of the plan may be delayed or the plan may
be revised, particularly in light of market developments and cash flow
constraints.
The principal components of the Company's consolidation plan include the
following:
Plant Rationalization. The Company plans to have shutdown several higher cost,
less efficient facilities by the end of 2003. The consolidation plan
contemplates that the production of these facilities will be reallocated to the
remaining lower-cost facilities and a new production facility to be constructed.
The Company also plans to construct a new quality verification line inspection
and shipping center and a heat treatment center. These actions are designed to
significantly reduce the Company's fixed operating costs, principally through
(1) the reduction of production employees represented by the USWA and (2) the
reduction of non-union salaried plant personnel.
Enhance Productivity at Remaining Facilities. Through the use of targeted
capital investment, improved product flows and facility specialization, the
Company believes that it can realize substantial variable cost savings at its
remaining facilities. Much of this variable cost improvement is expected to come
from closing outmoded shops with poor tolerances and high yield losses and
shifting to higher quality modernized operations with
16
<PAGE> 17
minimal yield losses. The elimination of obsolete steel making equipment may
also result in lower expenses on some production. Finally, targeted capital
expenditures for projects like the new Lorain processing center is expected to
allow the Company to insource production steps and recapture variable margin.
Elimination of Redundant Overhead Costs. By combining the overhead functions of
three companies, the Company plans to reduce its selling, general and
administrative and plant overhead through the elimination of redundant
positions.
In-sourcing Feedstock for Cold-Finishing and Bar Billets for Hot-Rolling. The
Company has captive cold-finishing divisions which have sourced approximately of
their hot-rolled bar requirements from internal sources. Under the Company's
consolidation plan, the Company anticipates that it will be able to self-supply
a greater proportion of its cold-finishing rough stock requirements which may
enable the Company to capture the margin between external purchase prices and
internal production costs.
There are a large number of factors which may affect the Company's ability to
complete this consolidation plan and achieve operating synergies and cost
savings. Many of these factors are beyond the Company's control. These factors
include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, increased
operating costs and unanticipated capital expenditures, problems in obtaining
funding for capital expenditures, customer certification issues the responses of
our competitors or customers and legal and regulatory developments.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company owns 19 manufacturing locations and leases its corporate offices.
The following table shows the locations, square footage and production capacity
as of December 31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
APPROXIMATE PRODUCTION
SIZE IN CAPACITY (A)
THOUSANDS OF (TONS IN
LOCATION SQUARE FEET THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Melt Shops/Caster Facilities:
Canton, Ohio 481 925
Lorain, Ohio 688 1,300
Johnstown, Pennsylvania 1,917 770
Hot-Rolling and Processing Mills:
Lorain, Ohio (two mills) 1,247 1,115
Lackawanna, New York 1,099 600
Massillon, Ohio (Oberlin Road) 667 480
Canton, Ohio 743 380
Chicago, Illinois (B) 2,019 --
Cold-Finishing Facilities:
Harvey, Illinois 331 120
Massillon, Ohio (Rose Avenue) 553 120
Gary, Indiana (Dunes Highway) 266 90
Batavia, Illinois 61 Closed
7/2/99
Cartersville, Georgia 92 60
Medina, Ohio 126 Closed
7/2/99
Gary, Indiana (Seventh Avenue) 200 60
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 135 60
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania 176 55
Willimantic, Connecticut 89 25
Corporate Offices 33 --
</TABLE>
(A)- Stated tons represent the production capacity of the individual
facility only and do not represent the Company's production capacity as
a whole added together.
(B)- The hot-rolling operations at the Chicago mill were shutdown in
November 1999. Certain processing operations are continuing in part of
this facility.
17
<PAGE> 18
All property relating to the Company's manufacturing facilities is owned by the
Company. In addition, the Company maintains operating leases for various sales
offices. The Company's corporate offices were relocated to Akron, Ohio in March
1999.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including environmental
proceedings with governmental authorities, personal injury and product liability
litigation and claims by present and former employees under federal and
counterpart state anti-discrimination and other laws relating to employment and
pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. Except those environmental
proceedings described above under "Item 1.-Business-Environmental Matters," the
Company does not believe that any proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its business, results of
operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
None
18
<PAGE> 19
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands of dollars)
The Predecessor-Combined
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company -
Consolidated Three Months
Period from Period from Year Ended Year Ended Ended Year Ended
August 13, 1999 to January 1, 1999 to December 31, December 31, December 28, September 30,
December 31, 1999 August 12, 1999 1998 1997 1996 1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales 519,934 512,871 472,570 $ 242,896 $ 40,251 77,163
Operating loss (137,273) (70,648) (70,333) (21,312) (8,702) (31,460)
Net loss from continuing
operations (183,024) (114,913) (113,558) (44,823) (13,525) (41,419)
Net loss before extraordinary
item (189,402) (114,913) (113,558) (44,823) (13,525) (41,419)
Extraordinary item (23,874) -- -- -- -- (2,214)
Net loss (213,276) (114,913) (113,558) (44,823) (13,525) (43,633)
Total assets (2) 1,415,418 1,047,760 888,065 205,678 206,287 200,979
Long-term debt (2) 481,062 589,228 422,483 130,741 132,093 132,426
Redeemable preferred stock (2) (3) -- 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500
</TABLE>
(1) The Company changed its fiscal year from its previous calendar quarter
basis ended September 30 to a 4/4/5 week fiscal quarter basis ending the
Saturday closest to December 31. As a result, the Company's fiscal year
1997 began on December 29, 1996 and ended on January 3, 1998. In 1999, the
Company changed its fiscal year to a calendar year ending on December 31,
1999. For comparative purposes fiscal years 1998 and 1997 are being
presented as ending on December 31, 1998 and 1997 respectively. The three
month transition period ended December 28, 1996 bridges the gap between the
Predecessor's old and new fiscal year-ends.
(2) Balance sheet balances at August 12, 1999 are not audited.
(3) Following the Combination and at December 31, 1999, the redeemable
preferred stock is part of the capitalization of the Company's ultimate
parent, RTI, Inc.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
The Company is the largest producer of SBQ steel products in the United States
with a market share of approximately 22%, based on 1999 calendar year pro forma
shipments. SBQ steel products are high quality hot-rolled and cold-finished
carbon and alloy steel bar and rod used primarily in critical applications in
automotive and industrial equipment. SBQ steel products are sold to customers
who require precise metallurgical content and quality characteristics. SBQ steel
products generally contain more alloys and sell for substantially higher prices
than merchant and commodity steel bar and rod products. The Company produces the
widest range of SBQ steel products in the United States and supplies a diverse
customer base that includes leading automobile and industrial equipment
manufacturers and their first tier suppliers.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The consolidated/combined results of operations include BarTech for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, Republic for the period from September 8, 1998
to December 31, 1998 and for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for USS/Kobe
for the period from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999. The results for
Republic and USS/Kobe are included from their respective acquisition dates.
Accordingly, prior period results are not comparable with the current periods.
19
<PAGE> 20
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 Net
sales for the year ended December 31, 1999 totaled $1,032.8 million on shipments
of approximately 1,878,000 net tons compared with net sales of $472.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 1998 on shipments of approximately 833,000 net
tons. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 1999 were comprised of $713.9
million for hot-rolled and $318.9 million for cold-finished, compared with
hot-rolled net sales of $251.7 million and cold-finished net sales of $220.9
million for the year ended December 31, 1998. The decrease in net selling value
per ton in the current year period is the result of a change in the product mix
toward lower value products combined with an overall decrease in selling prices
for both hot-rolled and cold-finished products as the Company initiated efforts
to reduce excess inventory levels.
The Company believes that the shipments following the completion of the
Combination were adversely affected by difficult market conditions in the
non-automotive sector, particularly during the third quarter, which led to lower
volumes and lower prices including reduced volumes at key customers. Management
believes that shipments to service centers especially suffered due to high
inventory levels coupled with higher than expected import levels. In addition,
shipments were significantly impacted by problems encountered in integrating the
three companies, particularly in the area of computer systems processing orders
and shipments, affecting customer service. For example, significant problems
were experienced with existing SAP information systems used at the Lorain
facility. The Company also had problems with systems at the Lackawanna facility,
a former BarTech facility, which were converted to systems employed at Republic.
Production was also adversely affected by a burn-through fault in one of two
basic oxygen process (BOP) vessels at the Lorain facility which idled the vessel
from September 22 through October 18 and disrupted production cycles in the
other vessel as well as casting and rolling operations at the Lorain facility.
The Company believes that its efforts to implement quality measures and teams in
order to improve product delivery reliability are having a positive effect.
However, its program to address information systems problems that have impacted
inventory and sales management, financial controls and product delivery is
expected to require most of 2000, and possibly some of first-half 2001, for
completion.
Cost of sales totaled $1,028.6 million, or 99.6% of net sales, for the year
ended December 31, 1999 compared with cost of sales of $471.6 million, or 99.8%
of net sales, for the year ended December 31, 1998. Cost of sales for the year
ended December 31, 1999 consisted of $807.1 million on hot-rolled products and
$221.5 million on cold-finished products compared with $262.9 million on
hot-rolled products and $208.7 million on cold-finished products for the year
ended December 31, 1998. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales
was primarily generated by a loss on contracts of approximately $13.6 million
and a $7.9 million write-down in inventory following a reassessment of
inventories subsequent to the Combination. This was partially offset by a
decrease in raw material prices.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $85.3 million, or 8.3% of net
sales, for the year ended December 31, 1999 compared with $39.4 million, or 8.3%
of net sales, for the year ended December 31, 1998. There was no change in
selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales
primarily because benefits derived from the combination of the selling, general
and administrative functions following the Combination were offset by expenses
incurred in the current year in relation to the Combination.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $42.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999 compared with $16.1 million for the year ended December 31,
1998. Approximately $22.8 million of the $26.3 million increase in depreciation
and amortization expense was due to an increase in fixed assets as a result of
the Combination.
Workforce reduction charges were $77.2 million for the year ended December 31,
1999 compared with $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. The
increase in workforce reduction charges resulted from 549 voluntary Early
Retirement Buyouts ("ERB's") being accepted during 1999 as compared to 200 ERBs
in 1998. Through December 31, 1999, 749 voluntary ERB packages had been
accepted.
Net interest expense was $89.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1999
compared with $43.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Approximately
$42.3 of the $46.0 million increase in net interest expense was attributable to
the higher average borrowings outstanding following the completion of the
Combination. The remainder of the increase was attributable to higher average
interest rates on the new borrowings compared to the borrowings repaid in
connection with the Combination.
The Company had other loss, net of $7.1 million for the year ended December 31,
1999 compared with other income of $2.9 million for the year ended December 31,
1998. The current year expense primarily consists of various reserves related to
the closure of several facilities in connection with the Company's consolidation
plan.
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998
consisted of currently payable income taxes, primarily foreign income taxes owed
by CDSC.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company also recorded an extraordinary
loss of $23.9 million from the early extinguishment of debt. This loss arose
from the repayment of certain debt in connection with the completion of the
Combination.
As a result, the Company reported a net loss of $328.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 1999 compared with a net loss of $113.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998.
20
<PAGE> 21
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED WITH YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 1998 totaled $472.6 million on
shipments of approximately 833,000 net tons compared with net sales of $242.9
million for the year ended December 31, 1997 on shipments of approximately
450,000 net tons. 1998 net sales for hot-rolled products were $251.7 million
while net sales for cold-finished products were $220.9 million for the same
period compared with 1997 hot-rolled net sales of $83.8 million and
cold-finished net sales of $159.1 million. Approximately $200.7 million of the
$229.7 million increase in net sales is due to the inclusion of Republic sales
from September, 1998 when Republic came under common control with BarTech. The
remainder is largely the result of a 17.1% increase in BarTech's shipping
volumes, primarily of hot-rolled products, coupled with a slight increase in
selling prices per ton on hot-rolled products. The increase in 1998 net sales
was adversely affected as selling prices per ton on cold-finished products
decreased as a reaction to downward market pressures on pricing from the
Company's competition.
Cost of sales totaled $471.6 million, or 99.8% of net sales, for the year ended
December 31, 1998 compared with cost of sales of $239.4 million, or 98.6% of net
sales, for the year ended December 31, 1997. Cost of sales in 1998 consisted of
$262.9 million on hot-rolled products and $208.7 million on cold-finished
products compared with $97.3 million on hot-rolled products and $142.1 million
on cold-finished products in 1997. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage
of net sales was due to a one-time non-cash purchase accounting fair value
adjustment of $22.6 million to conform Republic's inventory costing policies
with BarTech's. Excluding this one-time non-cash charge, cost of sales was 95.0%
of net sales at December 31, 1998. This decrease was due to operating cost
efficiencies associated with the higher production and shipping levels in 1998
partially offset by production outages experienced at the Lackawanna facility
during its third quarter 1998 due to the installation of a new rolling mill
electrical control system. The improvement in operating costs was primarily
generated by a decrease in manufacturing costs on a cost per ton basis for
hot-rolled products while costs on a per ton basis for cold-finished products
remained relatively unchanged.
Cost of sales for the year 1997 reflect operating cost inefficiencies related to
production outages during the fourth quarter of that period as BarTech
experienced a major mechanical breakdown at the Lackawanna hot bar rolling mill
operation. A failure on its No. 1 rolling stand resulted in a twelve-day
production outage. Additionally in 1997, BarTech experienced operating cost
inefficiencies relating to the integration of inexperienced personnel into the
Lackawanna rolling mill crews. BarTech added a third and fourth production shift
at the Lackawanna facility, which began in April and August 1997, respectively.
As a result, cost of sales as a percentage of net sales for 1997 was 116.1% for
hot-rolled products and 89.3% for cold-finished products.
Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 1998 was $16.1
million compared with $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1997.
Approximately $10.1 million of the increase was due to the inclusion of Republic
from September, 1998 when Republic came under common control with BarTech. The
remainder was primarily attributable to additional depreciation as a result of
the installation of a new rolling mill electrical control system at the
Lackawanna facility and upgrades to its computer system in an effort to improve
its processes related to financial and operational information.
Selling, general and administrative expense was $39.4 million during the year
ended December 31, 1998 compared with $21.7 million for the year ended December
31, 1997. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was due to
the inclusion of Republic from September, 1998 when Republic came under common
control with BarTech, which added $18.0 million in selling, general and
administrative expense. In the fall of 1998, the companies commenced marketing
their respective steel products jointly under the combined brand name "Republic
Technologies International" using a single sales force. However, throughout 1998
each customer purchase order for steel products was placed directly with BarTech
or Republic, as appropriate to make the sale. The costs of such joint marketing
efforts were
21
<PAGE> 22
borne ratably by BarTech and Republic based upon their approximate sales volumes
achieved through such joint marketing.
Selling, general and administrative expense included $1.3 million of
non-recurring expenses as BarTech incurred costs for employee severance
compensation and the relocation of its corporate offices previously located in
Seven Hills, Ohio as BarTech began initiatives to reduce overhead and increase
efficiency in anticipation of its combination with Republic.
Interest expense, net increased to $43.2 million for the year ended December 31,
1998 compared with $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1997.
Approximately $16.8 million of the increase is due to the inclusion of Republic
from September, 1998 when Republic came under common control with BarTech and
the borrowings related to the acquistion of Republic. The remainder reflects
higher average debt levels borrowed under BarTech's Revolving Credit Agreement.
Other income was $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1998 and $1.4
million for the year ended December 31, 1997. Income for the year ended December
31, 1998 primarily represented proceeds of $2.3 million for a settlement of an
antitrust lawsuit against certain graphite electrode producers. Other income for
the year ended December 31, 1997 is primarily comprised of a gain on the sale of
certain real property in Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
The provision for income taxes for 1998 and 1997 consisted of currently payable
income taxes, primarily foreign income taxes owed by CDSC. As a result, a net
loss of $113.6 million was reported in 1998 compared with a net loss of $44.8
million in 1997.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's primary liquidity needs relate to working capital needs, funding
requirements relating to its agreement with the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (the "PBGC"), capital expenditures and other costs relating to the
Company's consolidation plan, debt service requirements and tax distributions to
the Company's members.
PBGC OBLIGATIONS
In connection with the Combination Republic Technologies agreed with the PBGC to
fund $178 million into the Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. USWA Defined Benefit
Plan, a defined benefit pension plan for employees represented by the USWA in
connection with the headcount reduction and related early retirement benefits
contemplated by the Company's consolidation plan. Of the $178 million, $58.5
million has been funded through April 11, 2000 with an additional $33.7 million
to be funded by January 1, 2001, $18.5 million of which is due by July 1, 2000.
After such time Republic Technologies will be required to make the additional
quarterly contributions in accordance with the following schedule: $7.6 million
per quarter for the next two payments, $9.1 million per quarter for the next
four payments and $8.5 million per quarter for the final four payments. In
addition, pursuant to the Company's consolidation plan, Republic Technologies
will offer a combination of early retirement buyout packages and voluntary
severance plans to its employees, which the Company currently expects will
include expenditures outside its defined benefit plan of up to approximately
$36 million over the next 5 years. The actual cost of the early retirement
buyout packages and voluntary retirement plans will depend on the mix of such
arrangements offered to and accepted by the hourly employees represented by
the USWA.
In addition, with respect to the USS/Kobe Union Eligible Pension Plan, a defined
benefit plan for union employees, Republic Technologies has agreed with the PBGC
to maintain a specified level of funding based on statutory funding
requirements. The contributions shall be made as follows: for the year 2000, an
amount necessary to avoid an accumulated funding deficiency plus $4 million
($6 million); for 2001, an amount so that the December 31, 2001 credit balance
equals that of December 31, 2000 with interest plus $2 million; for 2002, an
amount so that the December 31, 2002 credit balance equals that of December 2001
with interest plus $2 million; for 2003, an amount so that the December 31, 2003
credit balance equals that of December
22
<PAGE> 23
31, 2002 with interest plus $2 million. Beginning with 2004, Republic
Technologies shall make contributions to maintain the December 31, 2003 credit
balance with interest. As security for such obligation, Republic Technologies
has provided the PBGC with a $5 million letter of credit. The Company currently
estimates that approximately $53.6 million of fundings will be required in
connection with these obligations.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The Company's four year consolidation plan contemplates capital expenditures of
$19 million in 2000, $56 million in 2001, $113 million in 2002 and $88 million
in 2003. The consolidation plan contemplates the construction of a new large bar
mill, which management estimates would cost approximately $90.0 million. The
Company anticipates receiving an estimated $11.0 million in government assisted
borrowings to fund a portion of this construction. The remaining funds required
to construct the new bar mill may be obtained from a combination of operating
cash flow, additional borrowings under the new credit facility, to the extent
then available, and proceeds from sales of assets and/or sales of debt or equity
securities. The plan to construct this facility is currently under review.
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
In conjunction with the Combination, Republic Technologies completed a private
offering of $425 million of senior secured notes and warrants and entered into
the $425 million new credit facility. The proceeds of this private offering,
together with approximately $239 million of borrowings under the new credit
facility and the proceeds from new equity contributions, were applied to
refinance a substantial portion of the indebtedness of Republic, RES Holding,
BarTech and USS/Kobe.
As a result of the Combination and the other transactions, the Company and
Republic Technologies have significant amounts of debt, with the interest
payments on the senior secured notes and interest and principal repayments under
the new credit facility representing significant obligations. The senior secured
notes will require semi-annual interest payments on January 15 and July 15 every
year until they mature on July 15, 2009. The senior secured notes require that
tender offers be made for such securities with certain proceeds from asset sales
in the event that such proceeds are not applied to specified purposes within
certain time periods. The loans under the new credit facility will require
periodic payments of interest and mature on August 13, 2004. The new credit
facility requires prepayment of loans and reductions of commitments with net
proceeds of specified asset dispositions, casualty and condemnation recovery
events, issues of equity and incurrences of permitted indebtedness. The 1984
environmental improvement revenue bonds, of which $9.0 million was outstanding
as of December 31, 1999, mature on December 1, 2001. In addition, the $5.5
million Series A Preferred Stock of Republic Technologies International, Inc. is
mandatorily redeemable on September 26, 2000. Payment of the redemption price
would require distributions or loans from Republic Technologies to the Company
followed by distributions or loans from the Company to RTI, Inc.
The senior secured notes and the new credit facility each contain significant
affirmative and negative covenants including separate provisions imposing
restrictions on additional borrowings, certain investments, certain payments,
sale or disposal of assets, payment of dividends and change of control
provisions, in each case, subject to certain exceptions. The ability of RTI to
receive distributions from Republic Technologies and its subsidiaries is
significantly restricted by the terms of the senior secured notes and the new
credit agreement. Under the terms of the senior secured notes, subject to
certain exceptions, generally neither Republic Technologies nor its subsidiaries
may declare or pay any dividend or make any other distribution or payment on or
in respect of capital stock, unless, at the time of and after giving effect to
the proposed payment, (1) no Default (as defined in the senior secured note
indenture) shall have occurred and be continuing, (2) immediately after giving
effect to such payment, the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined
in the senior secured note indenture) of Republic Technologies would be equal to
or greater than 2.5 to 1, and (3) the aggregate amount of all restricted
payments declared or made from and after the issue date would not exceed the 50%
of the Consolidated Net Income (as defined in the senior secured note indenture)
of Republic Technologies accrued on a cumulative basis during the period, taken
as one accounting period, beginning on October 1, 1999 and ending on the last
day of the fiscal quarter of Republic Technologies immediately preceding the
date of such proposed restricted payment or, if such aggregate cumulative
Consolidated Net Income of Republic Technologies for such period shall be a
deficit, minus 100% of such deficit, plus the cash proceeds from certain equity
offerings and value of certain investments. Under the terms of the new credit
facility, neither Republic Technologies nor its subsidiaries may declare or pay
any dividend to the Company or make any other distribution or payment to the
Company on or in respect of capital stock other than distributions or payments
for certain limited purposes and in limited amounts.
The senior secured notes are secured, subject to exceptions and limitations, by
(1) a first priority lien on, and security interest in, substantially all of the
existing assets of the issuers and the restricted subsidiaries, other than (a)
the CAST-ROLL and Cartersville, Georgia facilities, (b) inventory, (c) accounts
receivable and (d) intellectual property and related assets, and (2) a first
priority lien, shared on an equal and ratable basis with the lenders under the
new credit facility, on the equity interests of Republic Technologies and its
restricted subsidiaries. This collateral is subject to release without
substitution under a limited number of circumstances. Borrowings under the new
credit facility are secured by a first priority limited perfected security
interest in (1) the equity interests of Republic Technologies and its restricted
subsidiaries, shared on an equal and ratable basis with the senior secured notes
and (2) all presently owned and subsequently acquired accounts, inventory,
intellectual property and related assets of Republic Technologies and guarantors
and
23
<PAGE> 24
the real estate and fixed assets comprising, and the intellectual property
relating to, the CAST-ROLL facility, including the related melt shop.
The obligations under the senior secured notes are unconditionally and
irrevocably guaranteed jointly and severally by the Company and each of its
subsidiaries other than Republic Technologies, RTI Capital Corp. (the co-issuer
of the senior secured notes) and Oberlin Insurance Company. The obligations
under the new credit facility are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed
jointly and severally by the Company and each of its subsidiaries other than
Republic Technologies and Oberlin Insurance Company.
The high level of long-term debt relative to total capitalization could have
important consequences, including, among others, the following:
- RTI and Republic Technologies, may be unable to obtain additional
financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service
requirements and general corporate purposes;
- a substantial portion of cash flow from operations will need to be
used to pay principal and interest on indebtedness, which will reduce
the funds available for other purposes, including operations and
future business opportunities;
- RTI and Republic Technologies may need to make payments in connection
with environmental improvement revenue bonds related to USS/Kobe
facilities earlier than scheduled if USX makes early payment on these
bonds, and any such early payment may adversely affect liquidity;
- borrowings under the new credit facility as well as other future
borrowings, may be at variable interest rates of interest, which
create the risk of increased interest rates; and
- this leverage may make RTI and Republic Technologies more vulnerable
to economic downturns and competitive pressures.
TAX DISTRIBUTIONS
The Company and Republic Technologies are limited liability companies that are
expected to be treated as a partnership for income tax purposes and accordingly
are not an income taxpaying entity. However, pursuant to the limited liability
company agreement of the Company's parent, the Company's parent will be required
to make cash distributions to its members to the extent necessary to satisfy tax
obligations regarding members' investment in RTI, Inc. To the extent the
Company's parent is required to make these tax distributions, Republic
Technologies will be required to make equivalent cash distributions to the
Company. However, the Company believes that certain of its parent's members have
net operating loss carryforwards which may be available to offset a significant
portion of their taxable income attributable to their investment in the
Company's parent and reduce but not eliminate, the need for tax distributions.
Use of these net operating losses is subject to various limitations and
uncertainties and accordingly, the Company cannot make any assurances that these
net operating loss carryforwards will reduce the need for tax distributions or
that they will not be otherwise utilized.
Republic and USS/Kobe participated in Enterprise Zone Agreements granting
abatements from certain Ohio real and personal property taxes. USS/Kobe was
party to three 10 year agreements with a municipal subdivision (City of Lorain)
granting USS/Kobe a 50% abatement of taxes on specified investment in real
property, equipment and inventory, conditioned upon the company's best efforts
to maintain certain employment levels, subject to certain exceptions. The
reduction in taxes under these agreements amounted to approximately $2.5 and
$2.6 million in 1999 and 1998, respectively. Republic was party to a 10 year
agreement with a municipal subdivision (Canton Township) granting Republic a 75%
abatement of Ohio personal property taxes on certain investments in new
equipment. The reduction in taxes under the terms of this agreement amounted to
approximately $1.2 and $1.1 million in 1999 and 1998, respectively.
24
<PAGE> 25
LIQUIDITY SOURCES AND OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING LIQUIDITY
The Company intends to fund its working capital, pension contribution
requirements, capital expenditure, debt service requirements and tax
distributions to its parent company's members through cash flows generated from
operations and borrowings under the $425.0 million new credit facility.
Availability under the new credit facility is limited to a borrowing base equal
to (1) 60% of eligible inventory, plus (2) 85% of eligible accounts receivable,
plus (3) the lesser of 67% of the appraised value of the CAST-ROLL facility and
$125 million, which will decrease by $4.5 million per quarter beginning the
quarter ended December 31, 2000, minus (4) a reserve between $35.0 million and
$50.0 million. The CAST-ROLL facility is subject to reappraisal after March 31,
2001 or upon a default under the new credit facility. As of December 31, 1999,
approximately $336.4 million was outstanding under the new credit facility,
leaving undrawn commitments of approximately $63.0 million. The Company's net
availability on its revolving credit facility at April 30, 2000 was $16.5
million.
In connection with the Combination, RTI, Inc. issued 30,000 shares of its Series
C convertible preferred stock. The Series C convertible preferred stock accrues
dividends at a rate of 5% per year, which can be paid in cash or by the issuance
of additional shares of Series C convertible preferred stock at the election of
RTI, Inc.
The Company's performance during the third and fourth quarters of 1999 was below
expectations, causing the Company's liquidity position to be negatively
affected. The Company's liquidity position has also been negatively impacted by
the implementation of the Company's consolidation plan as a result of the time
lag between the incurrence of certain costs and the receipt of expected cash
flow benefits, such as in the case of headcount reductions requiring lump sum
payouts.
Management has sought to improve the Company's liquidity position by taking a
number of actions including, increasing spot prices, reducing administrative
staff, aggressive cost cutting programs, scaling back operations at its
Johnstown facility and reducing inventories. The Company has also reduced its
planned capital expenditures from $48 million to $19 million for 2000, has
obtained deferrals of $11 million of certain quarterly PBGC funding requirements
until July 2000, obtained deferrals of trade credit from a significant supplier
from June through October 2000, and obtained a deferral from the Ohio EPA of
$1.2 million of committed environmental expenditures until 2001. Management is
also pursuing additional financing from the State of Ohio.
The Company is in the process of selling its specialty steels division and
expects to complete the sale in the second quarter 2000. The Company is also in
the process of selling certain real estate and assets from facilities closed as
part of the consolidation plan.
Notwithstanding these efforts, the Company may need to obtain additional
financing to meet its cashflow requirements, including financing through the
sale of additional debt or equity securities. Restrictive covenants included in
the indenture relating to the senior secured notes and other debt obligations
limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, or sell assets
(most of which are pledged), and may otherwise limit the operational and
financial flexibility of the Company. The ability to sell its assets may also
be constrained by the provisions of the Company's new labor agreement.
25
<PAGE> 26
As a result of the factors mentioned above, the Company is highly leveraged and
could be considered a risky investment. Further information regarding the risk
factors of the Company can be found in the Company's S-4 Registration Statement.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and For Hedging Activities," ("SFAS 133"). This statement establishes accounting
and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded
on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value.
SFAS 133 requires that changes in the fair value of derivatives be recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. SFAS
133, as amended, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000,
and cannot be applied retroactively. The Company has not completed its
evaluation of SFAS 133 and accordingly, is unable to determine what impact, if
any, SFAS 133 will have on its financial statements.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
As is the case with most steel producers, the Company could incur significant
costs related to environmental issues in the future, in particular those arising
from remediation costs for historical waste disposal practices at its current
and former facilities. The Company's operations are subject to federal, state
and local, and in the case of the CDSC facilities, foreign, environmental laws
and regulations that in the event of environmental contamination could result in
the Company incurring significant liabilities.
The Company continuously monitors its compliance with applicable environmental
laws and regulations and believes that it currently is in substantial compliance
with them. The Company anticipates that its expenditures for environmental
control measures during the next twenty-four months will be approximately $5.6
million. The Company believes that costs in relation to remediation related to
historical waste disposal practices are likely to be in the range of $15.9
million to $25.5 million over the lives of the Company's facilities although
some third-party estimates are substantially higher. The Company's reserve to
cover probable environmental liabilities, including the matters discussed in
Item 1 - "Business", was approximately $21.4 million as of December 31, 1999.
Except as noted in Item 1 - "Business", the Company is not otherwise aware of
any significant environmental compliance and remediation costs for which the
establishment of a reserve would be appropriate. To the extent the Company
incurs any such remediation costs, these costs will most likely be incurred over
a number of years; however, future regulatory action regarding historical
disposal practices at its facilities, as well as continued compliance with
environmental requirements, may require the Company to incur significant costs
that may have a material adverse effect on its future financial performance. For
further information on environmental matters see Item 1 - "Business".
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this
report, including statements under Item 1 - "Business" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,"
regarding the Company's future financial position, results of operations,
business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives for future
operations, are forward-looking statements. In addition, these forward-looking
statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such
as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "foresee,"
"project," "plan" or "believe" or the negative of these words or variations on
these words or similar phrases. The Company has based these forward-looking
statements on our current assumptions, expectations and projections about future
events, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. You are cautioned that a
variety of factors could cause business conditions and results to differ
materially from what is contained in the forward-looking statements, including
the following:
- the Company's ability to increase sales to existing and new customers,
particularly sales to automotive and industrial equipment
manufacturers;
- the Company's ability to implement its consolidation plan and to
realize the expected benefits of the Combination in the time frame and
at the costs currently contemplated;
- market conditions and general risks associated with the steel
industry; and
- the matters discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4.
26
<PAGE> 27
The reader should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements
contained in this report.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risks due to changes in interest rates with
respect to certain of its long-term debt. The table below presents principal
cash flows and weighted average interest rates of the Company's long-term debt
at December 31, 1999 by expected maturity dates as well as the respective fair
value amounts.
The Company has a cold-finished facility in Canada and is, therefore, subject to
foreign currency exchange rate exposure. Historically, the exchange rate
volatility and related exposure to the Company has been minimal. At the present
time, the Company does not hedge foreign currency risks.
The fair value of the Company's Senior Notes was determined using quoted market
prices. The fair value of the Company's Solid Waste Revenue Bonds was determined
by the underwriter. Remaining long-term debt consists of the Company's economic
development financing, a subordinated note and an Industrial Revenue Bond (see
Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The fair value of the
Company's economic development financing approximates carrying value as the
development authorities continue to offer such financing on substantially the
same terms as provided to the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in millions)
There-
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 after Total Fair Value
--------- ----------- ------------ --------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed:
Senior Notes $425.0 $425.0 $276.3
Interest rate 13.75%
Revenue Bonds:
Solid Waste
Revenue Series 1996 $ 53.7 $ 53.7 $ 43.0
Interest rate 9.00%
Solid Waste
Revenue Series 1994 $ 20.2 $ 20.2 $ 16.2
Interest rate 8.25%
All other $ 2.4 $ 2.1 $ 2.5 $ 2.2 $ 1.4 $ 7.2 $ 17.8 $ 17.8
Average
interest rates 5.68% 5.17% 4.97% 4.63% 3.00% 3.00%
Variable $ 9.0 $ 8.3 $ 17.3 $ 17.3
Average
interest rates (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
</TABLE>
(1) - At variable Prime, LIBOR or other money market rates.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The response to this item is submitted in a separate section of this report
following the signature page.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Changes in Accountants
A report on Form 8-K was filed on December 28, 1998 by the Company's predecessor
announcing the appointment of the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
independent accountants to audit the fiscal 1998 financial statements of the
Company's predecessor and the dismissal of Arthur Andersen LLP,
27
<PAGE> 28
the Company's predecessor's previous independent public accountants, which has
been approved by the board of directors.
During the past two fiscal years, there were no disagreements with the Company's
predecessor's former accountants on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the Company's
predecessor's former accountants would have caused it to make reference to such
disagreement in connection with its report.
28
<PAGE> 29
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The Company's executive officers and directors as of April 13, 2000 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Joseph F. Lapinsky 50 Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer and
Director
George F. Babcoke 42 Executive Vice President and General Manager, Hot-Rolled and
Primary Operations
John G. Asimou 54 Executive Vice President and General Manager, Cold-Finished
Bar Operations
Stephen Graham 43 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
James T. Thielens, Jr. 41 Vice President, Commercial, Hot-Rolled Bar
Charles T. Cochran 45 Vice President, Commercial, Cold-Finished Bar
Katie B. Trinchard 42 Vice President, Information Technology
Joseph Kaczka 52 Vice President, Finance and Controller
John B. George 53 Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Secretary
Richard C. Lappin 55 Chairman and Director
Robert Friedman 56 Director
David A. Stockman 53 Director
David Blitzer 30 Director
Robert B. McKeon 45 Vice Chairman and Director
Thomas J. Campbell 40 Director
Lynn R. Williams 75 Director
Paul J. Wilhelm 57 Director
Albert E. Ferrara, Jr. 51 Director
Hiroharu Sawada 50 Director
Tadashi Takeuchi 46 Director
</TABLE>
Joseph F. Lapinsky has over 26 years of experience in the steel industry and
became President and Chief Operating Officer of BarTech and Republic in October
1998. Mr. Lapinsky also became a director of Republic at that time. Mr. Lapinsky
became Chief Executive Officer and a director of RTI in February 2000. Mr.
Lapinsky served as a corporate Vice President and President of Republic's
Hot-Rolled Bar Division from January 1997 to September 1998. Prior to that time
he served as General Manager of Republic's hot-rolled bar operations from
September 1995 to January 1997. Prior to that time he was Executive Vice
President of Autumn Industries, Inc. from September 1991 to September 1995 and
Executive Vice President of CSC Industries, Inc. from December 1987 to September
1991.
George F. Babcoke has over 23 years of experience in the steel industry and
became President of USS/Kobe Steel Company in July 1998. Mr. Babcoke served as
Vice President of Operations for USS/Kobe Steel Company from February 1997 until
July 1998. Before coming to USS/Kobe Steel Company, Mr. Babcoke held several
senior management positions at United States Steel's Gary Works, a fully
integrated steel producing facility in Gary, Indiana. Mr. Babcoke was the Plant
Manager, Primary Operations from 1996 to 1997 and the Plant Manager, Finishing
Operations from 1995 to 1996. Prior to that he held several positions including
Division Manager of Operation Services and Division Manager of Hot rolling.
John G. Asimou has over 31 years of experience in the steel industry and became
Executive Vice President and General Manager, Cold-finished Bar Division for
Republic and BarTech in October 1998. Mr. Asimou served as Executive Vice
President of Technology & Development of the Company from August 1996 until
September 1998. From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Asimou was Vice President - Quality &
Technology for Birmingham Steel Corporation. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Asimou
served as General Manager - Quality and Technology of American Steel & Wire
Corporation. From 1984 to 1986, Mr. Asimou was Metallurgical
29
<PAGE> 30
Service Engineer for Bethlehem Steel Corporation. From 1968 to 1984, Mr. Asimou
served in various SBQ bar and rod assignments for United States Steel
Corporation, a fully integrated steel producer.
Stephen Graham became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in
February 2000. From 1997 to February 2000, Mr. Graham served as Vice President,
Finance/Chief Financial Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., an
international automotive systems supplier. He also held positions as Chief
Financial Officer for Cambridge Industries, Inc., a plastics manufacturer, from
1996-1997, and as Vice President, Finance/Chief Financial Officer for Truck
Components, an automotive and industrial components manufacturer, from
1994-1996.
James T. Thielens, Jr. has over 19 years of experience in the steel industry and
became Vice President, Commercial, Hot-Rolled Bar Division for BarTech and
Republic in October 1998. Mr. Thielens served as Vice President, Sales and
Marketing, of Republic's Hot-Rolled Bar Division from March 1997 until September
1998. He served as General Manager of Marketing for Republic from March 1995 to
March 1997 and as a Regional Sales Manager of Republic's Bar Products Division
from April 1994 to March 1995. Prior to that time he held various sales and
marketing positions at Republic since its formation in 1989.
Charles T. Cochran has over 23 years of experience in the steel industry and
became Vice President, Commercial, Cold-Finished Bar Division for BarTech and
Republic in October 1998. Mr. Cochran served as Vice President, Sales and
Marketing, of Republic's Cold-Finished Bar Division from January 1997 to
September 1998. He served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing of Republic's
Bar Products Division from January 1995 to January 1997. From May 1994 to
January 1995 he was Republic's General Manager, Cold-Finished Bar Division.
Prior to that time he held various regional sales positions at Republic since
its formation in 1989.
Katie B. Trinchard became Vice President, Information Technology for BarTech and
Republic in October 1998. Ms. Trinchard served as General Manager, Information
Technology of BarTech from November 1997 until September 1998. From 1996 to
1997, Ms. Trinchard was an Independent Systems Integration Consultant whose
clients included among others, BarTech and Chase Brass & Copper, Inc., a
producer of copper alloy rod. From 1990 to 1996, Ms. Trinchard was Manager of
Consulting Services for Digital Equipment Corp.
Joseph Kaczka became Vice President of Finance and Controller for RTI in
September 1999. Mr. Kaczka joined RTI following over 30 years of service with
USS/Kobe Steel Company and its predecessor companies. He most recently served as
Treasurer and Controller for USS/Kobe Steel Company, which he had held since
1997. From 1995 through 1997, Mr. Kaczka held the position of Treasurer for
USS/Kobe Steel Company and from 1989 through 1995 he served as Controller for
USS/Kobe Steel Company. Prior to 1989, he held various positions at USX
locations in Pennsylvania, Alabama and Ohio.
John B. George has over 30 years of experience in the steel industry and became
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer for BarTech and Republic in October
1998. He was also appointed Secretary in December 1998. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. George previously served as Treasurer of Republic Engineered
Steels, Inc. since April 1991. From November 1989 to April 1991, he was
Assistant Treasurer for Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.
Richard C. Lappin became a director of Republic in January 1999. Mr. Lappin
became Chairman of the Board of RTI, Inc. in November 1999. Mr. Lappin is a
Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group, L.P., with which he has been
associated since 1999. Prior to this time, Mr. Lappin served as President of
Farley Industries, which included West-Point Pepperell, Inc., Acme Boot Company,
Inc., Tool and Engineering, Inc., Magnus Metals, Inc. and Fruit of the Loom,
Inc. Mr. Lappin is also a director of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., Clark
Refining Holdings, Inc., Collins & Aikman Corporation and Prime Succession, Inc.
Robert Friedman has been a Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group,
L.P. since March 1999. From 1975 to March 1999, Mr. Friedman was a partner with
the law firm of Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett. Mr. Friedman is also a director of
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., Clark Refining Holdings, Inc. and Corp.
Group.
30
<PAGE> 31
David A. Stockman was elected as a director of BarTech in March 1996 and became
Chairman of the Board of Directors of BarTech in September 1998. In September
1998, Mr. Stockman also became Chairman of the Board of Directors of Republic.
Mr. Stockman served as Chairman of the Boards of Directors of BarTech and
Republic through the completion of the Combination. Mr. Stockman served as
Chairman of the Board of Directors of RTI, Inc. until November 1999. From 1998
until September 1999, Mr. Stockman was a Senior Managing Director of The
Blackstone Group, L.P. In September 1999, Mr. Stockman founded Heartland
Industrial Management L.L.C., a new private equity sponsor. Mr. Stockman is also
a director of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.
David Blitzer was elected as a director of Republic in September 1998. Mr.
Blitzer is a Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group, L.P., which he
joined in 1991. He also currently serves on the board of directors of Haynes
International, Inc., Imperial Home Decor Group, Inc., Volume Services America,
Inc. and Volume Services, Inc.
Robert B. McKeon served as director of BarTech since September 1993 and as a
director of Republic since September 1998, and became Vice Chairman of the board
of directors of RTI, Inc. following the completion of the Combination. Mr.
McKeon has served as President of Veritas Capital, Inc., a New York- based
merchant banking and private equity investment firm, since its formation in
1992. From 1990 to 1992, Mr. McKeon was Chairman and from 1988 to 1990, was
President of Wasserstein Perella Management Partners, Inc., a New York merchant
banking fund. Mr. McKeon was formerly Chairman of Maybelline Inc. from 1990 to
1992 and Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Collins and Aikman Inc.
from 1989 to 1992. Mr. McKeon also serves as Chairman of H. Koch & Sons Inc.
Thomas J. Campbell served as a director of BarTech since September 1993. Mr.
Campbell has served as a partner and is a director of Veritas Capital Inc., a
New York merchant banking and private equity firm, since its formation in 1992.
From 1988 to 1992, Mr. Campbell was Vice President of Wasserstein Perella
Management Partners, Inc., a New York merchant banking fund. Mr. Campbell also
served as a director of Collins & Aikman Inc. from 1988 to 1992 and as a
director of Maybelline Inc. from 1990 to 1992. Mr. Campbell is also a director
of Baltimore Marine Industries, Inc.
Lynn R. Williams has been retired since 1994. From 1983 until his retirement,
Mr. Williams served as President of the USWA.
Paul J. Wilhelm has served as the President of U.S. Steel Group of USX since
1994 and as director of USX since 1995. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Wilhelm served as
Vice President-Operations of the U.S. Steel Group, and from 1993 to 1994, he was
the President of USS/Kobe Steel Company. Mr. Wilhelm is also a director of Union
Carbide Corporation and the Chairman of the American Iron and Steel Institute.
Albert E. Ferrara, Jr. has served as Vice President-Strategic Planning of USX
since 1997. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Ferrara served as the President of USX Realty
Development, an affiliate of USX.
Mr. Hiroharu Sawada has served a General Manager of product technology and
quality with Kobe Technologies Proprietary Inc. since November 1999. From July
1997 to October 1999, Mr. Sawada held a management position at the Iron and
Steel Division of Kobe Steel, Ltd., where he was responsible for bar and wire
rod technology as well as technical services to customers. From February 1993 to
June 1997, Mr. Sawada worked as General Manager and senior metallurgist in Kobe
Steel USA's Detroit office where he was responsible for technical service to
Kobe Steel's customers in the United States, Canada and Mexico.
Tadashi Takeuchi has served as a General Manager of joint ventures of Kobe Steel
USA, Inc. since April 1998. Prior to such time, Mr. Takeuchi held a management
position at the Iron and Steel Division of Kobe where he was responsible for
overseas operations.
31
<PAGE> 32
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999,
1998 and 1997, the compensation paid by the Company and its affiliates to its
Chief Executive Officer and each of its four most highly compensated executive
officers:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
All Other
Name & Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Compensation ($)
- ---------------------------------------- ---------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Thomas N. Tyrrell 1999 $ 400,000 $ 75,000 $ 3,840 (b)
Chief Executive Officer (a) 1998 $ 367,000 $ 175,000 $ 4,620 (b)
1997 $ 350,000 N/A $ 2,100 (b)
Joseph F. Lapinsky 1999 $ 275,000 $ 36,675 $ 2,640 (b)
Chief Executive Officer, President 1998 $ 229,160 $ 363,075 (c) N/A
& Chief Operating Officer (a) 1997 N/A N/A N/A
George F. Babcoke 1999 N/A (d) $ 300,000 (d) N/A
Executive Vice President & General 1998 N/A N/A N/A
Manager, Hot-Rolled and Primary 1997 N/A N/A N/A
Operations (a)
Robert L. Meyer 1999 $ 235,000 $ 67,000 $ 2,256 (b)
Executive Vice President & General 1998 $ 205,000 $ 112,500 $ 2,706 (b)
Manager, Rolling Operations(a) 1997 $ 195,000 N/A $ 1,170 (b)
John G. Asimou 1999 $ 225,000 $ 52,500 $ 2,160 (b)
Executive Vice President & General 1998 $ 191,250 $ 87,500 $ 2,525 (b)
Manager, Cold-Finished Bar Division 1997 $ 180,000 N/A $ 1,080 (b)
</TABLE>
(a) Messrs. Tyrrell and Meyer resigned from the Company in February 2000. Mr.
Lapinsky was named Chief Executive Officer at that time and Mr. Babcoke
assumed Mr. Meyer's dueties.
(b) The amounts set forth in this column for Messrs. Tyrrell , Lapinsky, Meyer
and Asimou reflect amounts of annual premiums paid by the Company under
group term life insurance for such officers. The life insurance carries a
maximum value of two times base salary for each officer and has no cash
surrender value.
(c) In fiscal 1998, Mr. Lapinsky received a retention bonus of $83,075, and
signing bonuses totaling $280,000 upon assuming his new positions with
BarTech and Republic.
(d) Mr. Babcoke was paid by U.S. Steel for 1999. The bonus represents a signing
bonus. Mr. Babcoke's annual salary is noted below in discussion about his
employment contract.
32
<PAGE> 33
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Messrs. Tyrrell, Lapinsky, Meyer and Asimou entered into employment agreements
with BarTech and Republic (the "Employment Agreements") effective October 1,
1998, each of which contains substantially similar terms and conditions except
with respect to salary provisions. Messrs. Tyrrell and Meyer resigned from the
Company in February 2000. The Employment Agreements for Messrs. Lapinsky and
Asimou will continue until September 30, 2001, and will renew annually
thereafter each October 1 for one year renewal terms unless terminated by
Messrs. Lapinsky and Asimou, as applicable, or the Company at least 90 days
prior to the expiration date. The annual base salaries of Messrs. Lapinsky and
Asimou currently in effect under these Employment Agreements are $275,000 and
$225,000, respectively, and each Employment Agreement provides for an annual
increase based on performance. Messrs. Lapinsky, Asimou and Cochran are also
entitled to receive an annual bonus, which will be no less than $100,000, and
$75,000, respectively, for fiscal years 1999 and 2000.
As a result of signing the Employment Agreements, Messrs. Tyrrell, Meyer and
Asimou and other members of management forfeited their rights to prior vested
and unvested options to purchase common stock of the Company
Mr. Babcoke entered into an employment agreement with BarTech and Republic,
which became effective July 1, 1999. Mr. Babcoke's employment agreement contains
substantially similar terms to the employment agreements of Messrs. Tyrrell,
Lapinsky, Meyer and Asimou. Mr. Babcoke's agreement provides for a base salary
equal to $235,000 and an annual bonus, which will be no less than $75,000 for
fiscal years 1999 and 2000.
The Company expects that members of its management, including the five executive
officers discussed above, with the exception of Messrs. Tyrrell and Meyer, will
be granted options to acquire common stock of RTI, Inc. equaling up to 5% of RTI
Inc.'s fully diluted equity at the time of granting these options.
DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION AND CONSULTING ARRANGEMENTS
The Company's directors receive no remuneration for serving as directors. All
directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending director
meetings.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
RTI is a limited liability company whose managing member is RTI, Inc. A number
of material arrangements relating to the voting or disposition of equity
securities of RTI, Inc. and RTI are included in an equityholders agreement,
described under Item 13, "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions".
Except as indicated below, the following table sets forth information as to the
approximate beneficial ownership of the voting securities of RTI, Inc. after the
consummation of the Combination, assuming exercise of outstanding warrants,
conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock and exchange by USX and
Kobe of their membership interests in the Company into RTI, Inc. common stock,
by the following:
- owners of more than 5% of the outstanding equity;
- each of the Company's directors and named executive officers; and
- all of the Company's executive officers and directors as a group.
The following table does not take into account options that are expected to be
granted to management in the future. Blackstone has the right to appoint a
majority of the directors of RTI, Inc. for so long as it beneficially owns at
least 25% of the fully diluted common stock of RTI, Inc. Except as indicated in
the footnotes to this table, the Company believes that the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all equity interests
shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated below, the
address for each of our beneficial owners is c/o Republic Technologies
International Holdings, LLC, 3770 Embassy Parkway, Akron, Ohio 44333-8367.
33
<PAGE> 34
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OWNERSHIP OF RTI, INC.
---------------------------------
NUMBER OF PERCENTAGE
NAME SHARES (#) OWNED (%)
- ---- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Blackstone Management Associates II L.L.C. ("BMA II")(1)(6) 3,077,918 38.2%
345 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10154
Veritas Capital Management L.L.C. ("VCM")(2)(8) 1,072,452 13.3%
660 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10021
USX Corporation(3) 1,111,405 13.8%
600 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
Kobe Steel, Ltd.(4) 1,013,650 12.6%
10-26 Wakinohama Cho
2 Chome Chuo-ku
Kobe City Hyogo
FirstEnergy Services Corp.(5) 429,478 5.3%
76 South Main Street
Akron, Ohio 44308
Joseph F. Lapinsky -- --
Stephen Graham -- --
John C. Asimou -- --
George F. Babcoke -- --
Richard C. Lappin(1)(6) 3,077,918 38.2%
Robert Friedman(1)(6) 3,077,918 38.2%
David A. Stockman(7) -- --
David Blitzer(1)(6) 3,077,918 38.2%
Robert B. McKeon(2)(8) 1,072,452 13.3%
Thomas J. Campbell (2)(8) 1,072,452 13.3%
Lynn R. Williams -- --
Paul J. Wilhelm -- --
Albert E. Ferrara, Jr. -- --
Hiroharu Sawada -- --
Tadashi Takeuchi -- --
All directors and named executive officers as a group (23 persons)(6)(8) 4,150,370 51.5%
</TABLE>
(1) BMA II's beneficial ownership in interest in the Company is held indirectly
through RTI, Inc. BMA II beneficially owns all of the 536,829 outstanding
shares of Class B common stock of RTI, Inc., 393,701, or approximately
73.3%, of the total 536,865 outstanding shares of Class C common stock of
RTI, Inc. and 2,147,388, or approximately 67.3%, of the total 3,191,637
outstanding shares of Class D common stock of RTI, Inc. Of BMA II's Class B
common stock, 423,132 shares are held directly by BRW Steel Holdings, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership initially organized by persons associated
with Veritas in connections with the initial formation of BarTech, and
113,697 shares are held by BRW Steel Offshore Holdings, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership initially organized by persons associated with
Blackstone and Veritas in connection with Blackstone's initial investment
in BarTech. Blackstone, a Delaware limited partnership for which BMA II is
the sole general partner, is the Class B general partner of BRW Steel
Holdings, and pursuant to the limited partnership agreement of BRW Steel
Holdings exercises all voting and dispositive powers with respect to the
Class B common stock held by BRW Steel Holdings. BMA II controls the Class
B general partners of BRW Steel Offshore Holdings, and pursuant to the
limited partnership of BRW Steel Offshore Holdings, exercises all voting
and dispositive powers with respect to the Class B common stock held by BRW
Steel Offshore Holdings. Accordingly, because BMA II has voting and
dispositive control with respect to all of the shares of Class B common
stock held by these partnerships, it may be deemed to beneficially own
these shares. The shares of Class C and Class D common stock beneficially
owned by BMA II are held directly by Blackstone Capital Partners II
Merchant Banking Fund, Blackstone Family Investment
34
<PAGE> 35
Partnership II L.P., Delaware limited partnerships for which BMA II is the
sole general partner, and Blackstone Offshore Capital Partners II L.P., a
Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership for which BMA II is the general
partner with voting and dispositive power. Accordingly, BMA II may be
deemed to beneficially own all of the shares of Class C and Class D common
stock held by Blackstone Capital Partners II Merchant Banking Fund,
Blackstone Offshore Capital Partners II L.P. and Blackstone Family
Investment Partnership II. Messers. Peter G. Peterson and Stephen A.
Schwarzman are the founding members of BMA II and control BMA II.
Accordingly, they may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares
of RTI, Inc. held by BMA II, although they disclaim this beneficial
ownership.
(2) VCM's beneficial ownership interest in the Company is held indirectly
through RTI, Inc. VCM beneficially owns 196,410, or approximately 66.5%, of
the total 295,199 outstanding shares of Class A common stock of RTI, Inc.
(which includes outstanding warrants for 91,609 shares of Class A common
stock), 143,164, or approximately 26.7% of the total 536,865 outstanding
shares of Class C common stock of RTI, Inc. and 732,878, or approximately
23.0%, of the total 3,191,637 outstanding shares of Class D common stock of
RTI, Inc. Of VCM's Class A common stock, 154,811 shares are held directly
by BRW Steel Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership initially
organized by persons associated with VCM in connection with the initial
formation of BarTech, and 41,599 shares are held by BRW Steel Offshore
Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership initially organized by
persons associated with Blackstone and Veritas in connection with
Blackstone's initial investment in BarTech. BRW Partners, Inc., a Delaware
corporation controlled by the principals of VCM, is the Class A general
partner of both BRW Steel Holdings and BRW Steel Offshore Holdings, and
pursuant to the limited partnership agreements of these partnerships,
exercises all voting and dispositive powers with respect to the Class A
common stock held by these partnerships. Accordingly, because VCM has
voting and dispositive control with respect to all of the shares of Class A
common stock held by these partnerships, it may be deemed to beneficially
own these shares. The shares of Class C common stock beneficially owned by
VCM are held directly by BRW Steel Holdings II, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership, and Veritas Capital, L.L.C. and KDJ, L.L.C., each Delaware
limited liability companies. The general partner of BRW Steel Holdings II
is BRW Partners, L.L.C., a limited liability company controlled by VCM.
Each of Veritas Capital and KDJ are also controlled by VCM. Accordingly,
VCM may be deemed to beneficially own all of these shares of Class C common
stock. The shares of Class D common stock beneficially owned by VCM are
held directly by The Veritas Capital Fund, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership of which VCM controls the general partner with voting and
dispositive power. Accordingly, VCM may be deemed to beneficially own all
of the shares of Class D common stock held by The Veritas Capital Fund. The
beneficial ownership number for VCM does not include .06% of the fully
diluted common stock held by an investor that is related to, but not an
affiliate of, VCM.
(3) USX's beneficial ownership interest in the Company is held directly by USX
RTI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an indirect subsidiary of
USX. Under the equityholders agreement described under Item 13, "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions", USX may exchange its ownership
interests in the Company for Class D common stock and warrants of RTI, Inc.
at any time after consummation of the Transactions, and under some
circumstances may be required to do so by Blackstone. The Company has
assumed such exchange in the above table.
(4) Kobe's beneficial ownership interest in the Company is held directly by
Kobe RTI Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an indirect subsidiary
of Kobe. Under the equityholders agreement described under Item 13,
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions", USX may exchange its
ownership interests in the Company for Class D common stock and warrants of
RTI, Inc. at any time after consummation of the Transactions, and under
some circumstances may be required to do so by Blackstone. The Company has
assumed such exchange in the above table.
(5) In connection with the consummation of the Transactions, FirstEnergy or its
affiliate purchased 30,000 shares of the Class C Convertible Preferred
Stock of RTI, Inc., which shares are immediately convertible, at the option
of FirstEnergy, into the indicated number of shares of RTI, Inc. common
stock beneficially owned by FirstEnergy. The conversion of FirstEnergy's
shares has been assumed in
35
<PAGE> 36
the table above.
(6) Messrs. Lappin, Friedman and Blitzer are affiliated with Blackstone in the
capacities described under Item 10, "Directors and Executive Officers".
Messrs. Lappin, Friedman and Blitzer disclaim beneficial ownership of any
equity of the Company or RTI, Inc. beneficially owned by BMA II.
(7) Mr. Stockman was a Senior Management Director of the Blackstone Group L.P.
from 1988 until September 1999.
(8) Messrs. McKeon and Campbell are the principals of Veritas and control VCM.
Accordingly, they may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares
of RTI, Inc. common stock owned by VCM, although they disclaim this
beneficial ownership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
MASTER RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENT
The Combination was effected pursuant to a master restructuring agreement
entered into among RTI Inc., the Company, Republic Technologies, Blackstone,
Veritas, USX, Kobe and various of their affiliates and related investors. The
master restructuring agreement contains customary representations, warranties,
covenants and indemnities. Indemnification claims under the master restructuring
agreement are generally satisfied through adjustments to our owners' relative
ownership interests.
EQUITYHOLDERS' AGREEMENT
In connection with the completion of the Combination, RTI Inc., Blackstone,
Veritas, USX, Kobe, FirstEnergy, various of their affiliates and other
equityholders of RTI Inc. entered into an equityholders agreement regarding
their ownership of the Company's equity and the common stock of RTI Inc.
Election of Directors. The equityholders agreement provides that the
parties will vote their shares of RTI Inc. common stock to elect a board of
directors that includes the following individuals:
- six directors designated by Blackstone;
- two directors designated by Veritas;
- two directors designated by USX;
- two directors designated by Kobe; and
- one director designated by the United Steelworkers union.
In each of the cases above other than the United Steelworkers, the right to
designate one or more directors is subject to decrease or termination if the
respective party's ownership level falls below thresholds specified in the
equityholders agreement. In addition, for so long as Blackstone is entitled to
designate six directors, it has the right upon its request to appoint additional
directors so as to obtain majority board control.
Fundamental Matters. Until the third anniversary of an initial public
offering of RTI Inc. common stock and provided that each of USX and Kobe
maintains specified equity ownership levels, the consent of each of USX and Kobe
is required for RTI Inc. to take specified actions, which, subject to various
exceptions, include the following:
- entering into or modifying specified types of material contracts
between RTI Inc. and affiliates of Blackstone or Veritas;
36
<PAGE> 37
- issuing equity interests in RTI Inc. and its subsidiaries, other than
specified allowances for management incentives, strategic transactions and an
initial public offering;
- incurring indebtedness other than pursuant to the Combination-related
transactions, refinancings of indebtedness existing at the time of the
Combination or otherwise permitted to be incurred by the equityholders
agreement, indebtedness pursuant to undrawn commitments under existing credit
facilities, and other incremental indebtedness not to exceed $500 million;
- other than pursuant to RTI Inc.'s existing capital expenditures
budget, making capital expenditures in excess of $50 million during the period
ending August 13, 2004;
- merging RTI Inc. with or into any other entity, or the acquisition of
the capital stock or assets of any other person, subject to various exceptions;
and
- selling two-thirds or more of the consolidated assets of RTI Inc.,
subject to various exceptions.
In addition, USX and Kobe generally have the right in connection with an initial
public offering of RTI Inc. common stock to purchase additional shares in the
public offering to the extent necessary to maintain their ownership percentage.
Exchange Events. Each of the affiliates of USX and Kobe that initially hold
interests in the Company have the right, subject to specified requirements, to
exchange the interests then owned by it for shares of Class D common stock of
RTI Inc. In addition, these parties are also entitled to receive in the exchange
warrants designed to mitigate the dilutive effect of the warrants issued with
the outstanding Senior Secured Notes issued by Republic Technologies and RTI
Capital Corp. and other RTI Inc. warrants. If these exchanges are completed, RTI
Inc. will own 100% of Holdings. Blackstone also generally may require these
exchanges to occur upon an initial public offering of the common stock of RTI
Inc.
Transfers of Common Stock. Unless an initial public offering of RTI Inc.'s
common stock has occurred, transfers of common stock prior to August 13, 2004
require the consent of Blackstone, except for transfers:
(1) to an affiliate,
(2) pursuant to the "tag-along" provision discussed below,
(3) pursuant to the "drag-along" provision discussed below,
(4) after three years following the closing of the Combination,
transfers subject to a right of first offer on the part of Blackstone and
(5) pursuant to the exercise of the registration rights discussed
below.
The equityholders agreement also provides that, without the prior consent of
Blackstone, USX and Kobe may only transfer equity interests in the Company to
each other or to RTI Inc.
Tag-Along Rights. The equityholders agreement grants to the parties the
right, subject to specified conditions, in connection with a proposed transfer
of common stock by either Blackstone or Veritas, to require the proposed
transferee to purchase a proportionate percentage of the shares owned by the
other parties, as applicable, at the same price and upon the same economic
terms.
Drag-Along Rights. So long as Blackstone owns 31% or more of the
outstanding common stock of RTI Inc. on a fully diluted basis, Blackstone has
the right, subject to specified conditions, in connection with an offer by a
third party to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common stock of RTI
Inc. held by the parties, to require the other parties to transfer all shares
owned by them to this third party at the same price and on the same economic
terms as the offer accepted by Blackstone.
37
<PAGE> 38
Registration Rights. The equityholders agreement gives Blackstone the right
to "demand" that RTI register its shares under the federal securities laws on
three separate occasions. The equityholders agreement also grants three "demand"
registrations to USX, three "demand" registrations to Kobe, one "demand"
registration to FirstEnergy and, subject to conditions, three "demand"
registrations to Veritas. The demand registration rights granted to USX, Kobe,
FirstEnergy and Veritas may, with limited exceptions, generally only be
exercised after an initial public offering of RTI Inc. common stock has
occurred. In addition, the equityholders agreement grants "piggyback"
registration rights to each of the equityholders each time RTI Inc. files a
registration statement in connection with a sale of common stock, except for
registration statements relating to
(1) shares underlying management options,
(2) the offering contemplated by the new labor agreement with the
United Steelworkers union or
(3) an initial public offering consisting only of primary shares.
PAYMENT OF FEES AND EXPENSES
From April 1996 to August 13, 1999, Blackstone and Veritas received annual
monitoring fees from BarTech equal to approximately $.9 million per year
pursuant to a monitoring agreement. Under the terms of the monitoring agreement,
Blackstone and Veritas provide management and financial monitoring services to
BarTech. Blackstone and Veritas have split the monitoring fees paid evenly
between them. Blackstone and Veritas have also been reimbursed by BarTech for
their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing such services.
In connection with the acquisition of Republic in 1998, RES Holding paid
transaction fees of $3.4 million to Blackstone and $.8 million to Veritas and
reimbursed them for all related out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, pursuant to
a monitoring agreement entered into with RES Holding, Blackstone and Veritas
were entitled to receive an annual monitoring fee for providing management and
financial monitoring services equal to approximately $1.1 million, with
Blackstone receiving 75% and Veritas receiving 25% of this monitoring fee.
Blackstone and Veritas have also been reimbursed by RES Holding and Republic for
their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services. Approximately
$2.4 million of accrued but unpaid BarTech and RES Holding monitoring fees were
paid following the Combination.
In connection with the Combination, the Company paid transaction fees in the
aggregate of $4.0 million to Blackstone, Veritas, USX and affiliates of Kobe. In
addition, the Company reimbursed or is expected to reimburse Blackstone,
Veritas, USX and Kobe for their out-of-pocket expenses related to the
Combination. Upon consummation of the Combination, the Company entered into a
new monitoring agreement with Blackstone, Veritas, USX and Kobe that replaced
the existing monitoring agreements regarding BarTech and Republic, with the
parties to receive an aggregate annual fee of $4.0 million.
In addition, in the future, Blackstone, Veritas, USX and Kobe or their
affiliates may receive customary fees for other advisory and transactional
services rendered to the Company. If such services are rendered in the future,
the fees will be negotiated from time to time on an arms-length basis and will
be based on the services performed and the fees charged to third parties for
comparable services.
SALES TO AND AGREEMENTS WITH BLACKSTONE AFFILIATES
During the period from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999, the period from
January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 1998, the
Company had approximately $43.6 million, $54.2 million and $89.0 million,
respectively, of net sales to American Axle & Manufacturing, a company
controlled by Blackstone. All such sales were in the ordinary course of business
and on arm's-length terms.
38
<PAGE> 39
The Company and Haynes, a company controlled by Blackstone, are parties to a
facilities management agreement dated as of April 15, 1999, by which Haynes
agreed to manage the Company's Baltimore, Maryland and Canton, Ohio Harrison
Avenue specialty steel finishing facilities. The Company continues to own these
facilities and must approve all material expenditures and financial decisions of
Haynes with respect to these facilities. As compensation for the services
provided, Haynes receives management fees equal to the total compensation costs,
including benefits, of the Haynes personnel providing management services to the
Company that is allocable to the time these personnel devote to these
facilities. In addition, Haynes is reimbursed by the Company for all of its
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of
management services.
AGREEMENTS WITH USX, KOBE, FIRSTENERGY AND THEIR AFFILIATES
In connection with the Combination, the Company entered into the following
agreements with USX, Kobe and FirstEnergy (another equity investor in the
Company's parent) or their affiliates:
ROUND SUPPLY AGREEMENT
- ----------------------
The Company entered into a five-year supply agreement with USX and the new
tubular steel joint venture between USX and Kobe, which provides for the tubular
joint venture purchasing all of its requirements for steel rounds at its Lorain,
Ohio pipemill from the Company up to a maximum of 400,000 tons per year for a
price equal to the Company's production costs plus an agreed upon margin per
ton. The tubular joint venture also has the right to purchase up to an
additional 200,000 tons per year for a price equal to the Company's fixed
production costs plus an agreed upon margin per ton. If the tubular joint
venture is unable to purchase at least 400,000 tons of steel rounds per year for
its Lorain, Ohio pipemill, USX is required to purchase any shortfall, under
specified circumstances, to satisfy the steel round requirements of its
Fairfield, Alabama pipemill facility that can not be satisfied from USX's
internal production of steel rounds. The Company sold approximately $51.1
million worth of seamless rounds to USX in the period from August 13, 1999 to
December 31, 1999.
COKE SUPPLY AGREEMENT
- ---------------------
The Company entered into a five-year supply agreement with USX, which provides
that RTI purchase substantially all of its requirements for coke for use in its
Lorain, Ohio blast furnace from USX. The purchase price for coke is based on
market prices and adjusted annually, subject to most favored nations provisions
for price and other conditions, which allow the Company to receive the most
favorable terms that USX grants to any of its coke customers. The Company
purchased approximately $22.0 million worth of coke from USX in the period from
August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999.
PELLET SUPPLY AGREEMENT
- -----------------------
Under this agreement, the Company agreed to purchase all of its iron ore pellet
requirements for its Lorain, Ohio blast furnace from USX for a period of five
years. The purchase price for pellets is generally based on market prices and
will be adjusted annually, subject to most favored nation provisions for price
and other conditions, which allow the Company to receive the most favorable
terms that USX grants to any of its pellet customers. The Company purchased
approximately $47.1 million worth of iron ore pellets from USX in the period
from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999.
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AGREEMENTS
- ------------------------------
The Company entered into technology transfer and related agreements with Kobe
and one of its affiliates which provides the Company with a license to use
various Kobe technology and requires Kobe to provide the Company with various
technical assistance in return for annual payments to Kobe of approximately $1
million.
SAFE HARBOR LEASE MATTERS AGREEMENT
- -----------------------------------
Pursuant to the master restructuring agreement, the Company received certain
property formerly owned by USS/Kobe that qualifies as "Safe Harbor Lease
Property," thus affording USX and Kobe with tax benefits. The Safe Harbor Lease
Matters Agreement contains covenants and warranties to ensure that the property
remains qualified as Safe Harbor Lease Property and to ensure the continuation
of the tax benefits.
39
<PAGE> 40
ENERGY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
- ---------------------------
In connection with the consummation of the Combination, the Company entered into
an agreement with FirstEnergy under which it appointed FirstEnergy as its
exclusive representative for the procurement of energy supply and services. As a
result of this arrangement, it is likely that much of the Company's energy
purchasing requirements will eventually be filled by FirstEnergy. Also in
connection with the consummation of the Combination, FirstEnergy purchased $30
million of the Series C convertible preferred stock of RTI, Inc.
In connection with the Combination, the Company also entered into an agreement
with the new tubular steel joint venture between USX and Kobe regarding the
provision of various utilities and an agreement with USX regarding the provision
of various transitional services. In addition, at the closing of the
Combination, the Company entered into an agreement with USX regarding payment of
certain payables owed by USS/KOBE Steel Company to USX.
40
<PAGE> 41
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a)(1) The following consolidated financial statements of the Company
are included in a separate section of this report following
the signature page:
Reports of Independent Auditors
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Operations - Periods From
August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 to
August 12, 1999 and the Years Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997
Consolidated/Combined Balance Sheets - December 31, 1999 and 1998
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Members'
Interest/Stockholders' Deficit - Periods From August 13, 1999 to
December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and
the Years Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Cash Flows - Periods From
August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 to
August 12, 1999 and the Years Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997
Notes to Consolidated/Combined Financial Statements -
December 31, 1999
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule
The following consolidated financial statement schedule of the
Company is included in a separate section of this report
following the signature page:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and
Exchange Commission are not required under the related
instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore, have been
omitted.
(a)(3) Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description
- ----------- -----------
2.1* Master Restructuring Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, among
RTI, Inc., RES Holding Corporation ("RES Holding"), Republic
Engineered Steels, Inc ("Republic"), Blackstone Capital Partners II
Merchant Banking Fund L.P. ("BCP II"), Blackstone Offshore Capital
Partners II L.P. ("BOCP II"), Blackstone Family Investment
Partnership II L.P. ("BFIP II"), The Veritas Capital Fund L.P.
("Veritas Fund"), HVR Holdings, LLC ("HVR"), USX Corporation
("USX"), Kobe Steel, Ltd. ("Kobe"), Kobe Delaware Inc. ("Kobe
Delaware"), USS Lorain Holding Company, Inc. ("USS Lorain"), USX RTI
Holdings, Inc. ("USX Holdings"), Kobe/Lorain Inc. ("Kobe/Lorain"),
Kobe RTI Holdings Inc. ("Kobe Holdings"), RTI, Republic
Technologies, Lorain Tubular Company, LLC ("Lorain Tubular") and
USS/Kobe Steel Company ("USS/Kobe SteelCo").
41
<PAGE> 42
3.1* Limited Liability Company Agreement of Republic Technologies
International Holdings, LLC ("RTI")
4.1* Indenture, dated as of August 13, 1999, Republic Technologies
International, LLC ("Republic Technologies"), RTI Capital Corp.
("RTI CapCo."), Republic Technologies International, Inc. ("RTI,
Inc."), Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC ("N&T"), Bliss & Laughlin, LLC
("B&L"), Canadian Drawn Steel Company, Inc. ("CDSC"), and United
States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee.
4.2* Form of 13 3/4% Senior Secured Note due 2009, Series B (included in
Exhibit 4.1)
4.3* Notes Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
August 13, 1999, among Republic Technologies, RTI CapCo, RTI, N&T,
B&L, CDSC, Chase, DLJ and BBRS.
4.4* Security Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, among Republic
Technologies, RTI CapCo, RTI, N&T, B&L, CDSC and the United States
Trust Company of New York, as Collateral Agent.
4.5* Form of Mortgage, Assignment of Leases, Security Agreement and
Fixture Filing, dated as of August 13, 1999, by Republic
Technologies to United States Trust Company of New York, as
Mortgagee.
4.6* Master Pledge Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, among Republic
Technologies, RTI CapCo, RTI, N&T, B&L, CDSC and United States Trust
Company of New York, as Collateral Agent.
4.7* Amended and Restated Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement,
dated as of August 13, 1999, among United States Trust Company of
New York, as Collateral Agent, United States Trust Company of New
York, as Trustee, the Pennsylvania Lenders (as defined therein),
BankBoston, N.A., as Agent, RTI, Republic Technologies, RTI CapCo,
N&T, B&L and CDSC.
4.8* Pledge Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, among
the Secured Parties (as defined therein) and United States Trust
Company of New York, as Collateral Agent.
10.1* Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, among
Republic Technologies, BankBoston, N.A., as Administrative Agent and
Co-Book Manager, Bank of America, N.A, as Syndication Manager and
Co-Book Manager, The Chase Manhattan Bank , as Documentation Agent
and Co-Book Manager, the Lending Institutions Named Therein, and
BBRS and Bank of America, N.A., as Co-Arrangers.
10.2* Security Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, among Republic
Technologies, RTI, RTI CapCo, N&T, B&L, CDSC and BankBoston, N.A.
10.3* Trademark Collateral Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as of
August 13, 1999, between Republic Technologies and BankBoston, N.A.
42
<PAGE> 43
10.4* Patent Collateral Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as of August
13, 1999, between Republic Technologies and BankBoston, N.A.
10.5* Canadian Security Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, between
CDSC and BankBoston, N.A.
10.6* Assignment of Intellectual Property, dated as of August 13, 1999, by
CDSC to BankBoston, N.A.
10.7* Open-End Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents, Income
and Proceeds, dated as of August 13, 1999, from Republic
Technologies to BankBoston, N.A.
10.8* Amended and Restated Equityholders Agreement, dated as of August 13,
1999, among BCP II, BOCP II, BFIP II, Veritas Fund, Veritas Capital,
LLC, KDJ, LLC, BRW Steel Holdings, L.P., BRW Steel Holdings II,
L.P., BRW Steel Offshore Holdings, L.P., RTI, Inc., RES Holding,
Republic Technologies, USX, USX Holdings, Kobe Delaware, Kobe, Kobe
Holdings, HVR, Sumitomo Corporation of America, FirstEnergy Services
Corp., Triumph Capital Investors II, L.P., TCI-II Investors, L.P.,
First Dominion Capital, LLC, TCW Leveraged Income Trust, L.P., TCW
Leveraged Income Trust II, L.P., TCW Shared Opportunity Fund, L.P.,
Shared Opportunity Fund IIB, LLC, Shared Opportunity Fund III, LLC,
and the other equityholders named therein.
10.9* Round Supply Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1999, between
Republic Technologies and USX.
10.10* Master Energy Services and Supply Agreement, dated as of August 13,
1999, between Republic Technologies and FirstEnergy Services Corp.
10.11* Transition, Administration and Utilities Services Agreement, dated
as of August 13, 1999, between Lorain Tubular and Republic
Technologies.
10.12* Letter Agreement, dated August 13, 1999, among Republic Technologies
and USX.
10.13* Letter Agreement, dated August 13, 1999, among Republic
Technologies, Lorain Tubular, Kobe and USX.
10.14 Master Agreement dated July 18, 1994, by and among the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, acting by and
43
<PAGE> 44
through the Department of Commerce, the Pennsylvania Industrial
Development Authority, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting by
and through the Department of Community Affairs, the Johnstown
Industrial Development Corporation, the County of Cambria, the City
of Johnstown, Republic Technologies and BRW Steel
Corporation-Johnstown. (Filed as exhibit to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of Bar Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No.
333-4254) and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.15 Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement dated September 21, 1994, by
and among the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting by and through
the Department of Commerce, the Pennsylvania Industrial Development
Authority, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting by and through
the Department of Community Affairs, the Johnstown Industrial
Development Corporation, the County of Cambria, the City of
Johnstown and Republic Technologies. (Filed as exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar Technologies Inc. (SEC
Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated by reference and made a
part hereof.)
10.16* Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement dated August 1999 among the
Johnstown Industrial Development Corporation, the County of Cambria,
the City of Johnstown and Republic Technologies.
10.17 Economic Development Partnership Loan Agreement dated September 21,
1994, between the City of Johnstown and Republic Technologies.
(Filed as exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar
Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated
by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.18 Economic Development Set-Aside Loan Agreement dated as of July 6,
1995, between the City of Johnstown and Republic Technologies.
(Filed as exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar
Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated
by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.19 Economic Development Set-Aside Loan Agreement dated July 6, 1995,
between the City of Johnstown and Republic Technologies. (Filed as
exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar
Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated
by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.20 Section 108 Loan Agreement dated July 20, 1994, by and between the
City of Johnstown, the County of Cambria and Republic Technologies.
(Filed as exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar
Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated
by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.21 Amendment No. 1 to Section 108 Loan Agreement, dated August 1994, by
and among the City of Johnstown, the County of Cambria and Republic
Technologies. (Filed as exhibit to the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 of Bar Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254)
and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.22 Community Development Block Grant Loan Agreement dated November 3,
1995, between Cambria County and Republic Technologies. (Filed as
exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar
Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated
by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.23 BID Loan Agreement dated March 12, 1996, between Johnstown
Industrial Development Corporation and Republic Technologies. (Filed
as exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Bar
Technologies Inc. (SEC Registration No. 333-4254) and incorporated
by reference and made a part hereof.)
44
<PAGE> 45
10.24 Loan Agreement dated December 1, 1988 between Development Authority
of Cartersville and Bliss & Laughlin Steel Company. (Filed as an
exhibit to Form 10-K of Bliss & Laughlin Industries Inc. for the
year ended September 30, 1989 and incorporated by reference and made
a part hereof.)
10.25 Trust Indenture dated as of October 1, 1994, between BankOne,
Columbus, N.A. ("BankOne") and the Ohio Water Development Authority
(the "Authority"). (Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 1994 and incorporated by reference and made a part
hereof.)
10.26 Trust Indenture dated as of June 1, 1996, between BankOne and the
Authority. (Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30,
1996 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.27 Loan Agreement dated as of October 1, 1994, between Republic
Technologies and the Authority. (Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 1994 and incorporated by reference and
made a part hereof.)
10.28 Loan Agreement dated as of June 1, 1996, between Republic
Technologies and the Authority. (Filed as an exhibit to Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 and incorporated by reference and
made a part hereof.)
10.29 Project Note dated October 1, 1994, by Republic Technologies to the
Trustee. (Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30,
1994 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.30 Project Note dated June 1, 1996, by Republic Technologies to the
Trustee. (Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30,
1996 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.31 Project Bond dated October 1, 1994, issued by the Authority. (Filed
as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Republic
Engineered Steels, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 1994 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.32 Project Bond dated as of June 1, 1996, issued by the Authority.
(Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Republic
Engineered Steels, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.33* Participation Agreement dated as of August 13, 1999, between
Republic Technologies and USX.
10.34 Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1998, between the Company and
Mr. Joseph Lapinsky, President and Chief Operating Officer. (Filed
as exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bar Technologies Inc.
for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1999 and incorporated by
reference and made a part hereof.)
45
<PAGE> 46
10.35 Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1998, between the Company and
Mr. John Asimou, Executive Vice President and General Manager,
Cold-Finished Bar Division. (Filed as exhibit to Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Bar Technologies Inc. for the fiscal year ended January
2, 1999 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.)
10.36* Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 1999, between Republic
Technologies and Mr. George F. Babcoke.
10.37* Master Collective Bargaining Agreement dated as of September 30,
1998 among Republic Technologies, RTI, Inc. and the United
Steelworkers of America (the "USWA").
10.38* 1999 Settlement Agreement, dated as of August 2, 1999, between
BarTech, Republic, Republic Technologies and the USWA.
10.39* Agreement dated as of November 2, 1998, between Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation and RES Holding.
10.40* Transaction and Monitoring Fee Agreement dated August 13, 1999,
among Blackstone Management Partners L.P., Veritas, USX, Kobe and
Republic Technologies.
16 Letter regarding Changes in Certifying Accountants (filed as Exhibit
16 to the Bar Technologies Inc. Form 8-K dated December 28, 1998,
and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof).
21* Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
* Filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-90709) of Republic Technologies International,
LLC and RTI Capital Corp, as co-issuers, and Republic
Technologies International Holdings, LLC and the other
guarantors named therein and incorporated by reference and
made a part hereof.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
46
<PAGE> 47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Republic Technologies International Holdings, LLC
-------------------------------------------------
(Registrant)
Date: May 8, 2000 By: /s/ Joseph F. Lapinsky
----------------------
Joseph F. Lapinsky
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief
Operating Officer
By: /s/ Joseph A. Kaczka By: /s/ Stephen Graham
--------------------------- -------------------------
Joseph A. Kaczka Stephen Graham
Vice President, Finance Executive Vice President and
and Controller and Chief Financial Officer
Chief Accounting Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints
Richard C. Lappin, Joseph F. Lapinsky and Robert Friedman, each acting alone,
his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments or supplements to this
report and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities indicated on May 8, 2000.
/s/ Joseph F. Lapinsky /s/ Robert Friedman
- ---------------------- -------------------
Joseph F. Lapinsky, Chief Executive Robert Friedman, Director
Officer, President, Chief Operating
Officer and Director
-------------------
David Blitzer, Director
/s/ Richard C. Lappin /s/ Lynn R. Williams
- ---------------------- -------------------
Richard C. Lappin, Chairman and Director Lynn R. Williams, Director
/s/ Paul J. Wilhelm
- ---------------------- -------------------
Robert B. McKeon, Vice Chairman and Paul J. Wilhelm, Director
Director
/s/ Hiroharu Sawada
- ---------------------- -------------------
Thomas J. Campbell, Director Hiroharu Sawada, Director
/s/ David A. Stockman
- ---------------------- -------------------
David A. Stockman, Director Tadashi Takeuchi, Director
/s/ Albert E. Ferrara, Jr. /s/ Stephen Graham
- ---------------------- -------------------
Albert E. Ferrara, Jr., Director Stephen Graham,
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
47
<PAGE> 48
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors of
Republic Technologies International Holdings, LLC
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Republic
Technologies International Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
members' interest, and cash flows for the period from August 13, 1999 to
December 31, 1999. We have also audited the combined balance sheet of the
Predecessor, Bar Technologies Inc. and Republic Engineered Steels, Inc., both of
which were under common ownership and common management, as of December 31, 1998
and the related combined statement operations, stockholder's deficit and of cash
flows for the period from January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the year ended
December 31, 1998. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule for
the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 listed in the Index at Item 14(a)(2).
These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31,
1999, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the
period from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999, and the combined financial
position of the Predecessor as of December 31, 1998 and the combined results of
its operations and its cash flows for the period from January 1, 1999 to August
12, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 1998 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, such financial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 1999
and 1998, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company's and the Predecessor's recurring
losses and negative cash flows from operations and the Company's members'
interest deficiency and limited available liquidity from existing credit
resources raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note
1. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recovery and classification of asset carrying
amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
May 8, 2000
48
<PAGE> 49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of
Bar Technologies Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended January 3, 1998
of Bar Technologies Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries. These
consolidated financial statements and schedule referred to below are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Bar
Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 3, 1998, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Our audit of Bar Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries was made for the purpose of
forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Schedule
II is presented for the purpose of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This
schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 24, 1998
49
<PAGE> 50
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED/COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIODS FROM AUGUST 13, 1999 TO
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND JANUARY 1, 1999
TO AUGUST 12, 1999 AND THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
The Company- The Predecessor - Combined
Consolidated -----------------------------------------------------
Period From Period From
August 13, 1999 January 1, 1999 Year Ended Year Ended
to December 31, to August 12, December 31, December 31,
1999 1999 1998 1997
------------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 519,934 $ 512,871 $ 472,570 $ 242,896
Cost of goods sold 542,789 485,887 471,617 239,370
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Gross profit (loss) (22,855) 26,984 953 3,526
Selling, general and administrative
expense 51,513 33,822 39,374 21,730
Depreciation and amortization expense 20,492 21,889 16,107 4,523
Workforce reduction charges (Note 10) 35,180 42,065 18,708 --
Other (income) expense, net 7,233 (144) (2,903) (1,415)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating loss (137,273) (70,648) (70,333) (21,312)
Interest expense, net 45,317 43,845 43,222 23,306
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes (182,590) (114,493) (113,555) (44,618)
Provision for income taxes (Note 11) 434 420 3 205
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss from continuing operations (183,024) (114,913) (113,558) (44,823)
Loss from disposition of discontinued
operations (Note 16) 6,378 -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss before extraordinary item (189,402) (114,913) (113,558) (44,823)
Extraordinary loss from early
extinguishment of debt (Note 4) 23,874 -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss $(213,276) (114,913) (113,558) (44,823)
=========
Preferred stock dividends 224 385 385
--------- --------- ---------
Net loss applicable to common shares $(115,137) $(113,943) $ (45,208)
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
50
<PAGE> 51
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED/COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
The Company - The Predecessor -
Consolidated Combined
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
------------------ -----------------
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,637 $ 5,948
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $27,237 and
$6,897, respectively 157,166 96,507
Inventories (Note 5) 284,668 201,309
Assets held for sale (Note 16) 15,219 22,408
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 7,907 14,722
---------- ----------
Total current assets 469,597 340,894
Property, plant and equipment:
Land and improvements 15,875 12,496
Buildings and improvements 43,032 49,614
Machinery and equipment 736,300 295,159
Construction-in-progress 25,361 13,366
---------- ----------
Total property, plant and equipment 820,568 370,635
Accumulated depreciation (56,802) (18,579)
---------- ----------
Net property, plant and equipment 763,766 352,056
Assets held for sale (Note 16) 9,009 11,687
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $11,203
and $10,456, respectively (Note 6) 163,479 173,377
Other assets 9,567 10,051
---------- ----------
Total assets $1,415,418 $888,065
========== ==========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
51
<PAGE> 52
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED/COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
The Company - The Predecessor -
Consolidated Combined
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
----------------- -----------------
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' INTEREST/STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT
<S> <C> <C>
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 196,050 $ 111,493
Accrued interest 26,494 4,885
Accrued compensation and benefits 50,162 29,272
Other postretirement benefits (Note 10) 15,365 4,200
Defined benefit pension obligations (Note 10) 42,000 57,801
Other accrued liabilities 57,599 43,430
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 7) 2,391 7,005
Revolving credit facilities (Note 8) 336,397 144,000
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities 726,458 402,086
Long-term debt (Note 7) 481,062 422,483
Deferred income taxes (Note 11) -- 5,001
Accrued environmental liabilities (Note 15) 17,373 13,057
Other postretirement benefits (Note 10) 204,268 95,712
Defined benefit pension obligations (Note 10) 56,480 7,339
Other liabilities 40,758 6,942
----------- -----------
Total liabilities 1,526,399 952,620
Redeemable stock:
Series A preferred stock; $.001 par value; authorized, 1,100
shares; issued and outstanding, 1,100 shares -- 5,500
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Members' interest/stockholders' deficit:
Members' interest (110,308) --
Bar Technologies Inc.:
Series B preferred stock; $.001 par value; authorized, issued
and outstanding, 1 share -- --
Class A common stock; $.001 par value; authorized 1,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding, 204,458 shares -- --
Class B common stock; $.001 par value; authorized, 600,000
shares; issued and outstanding, 536,829 shares -- 1
Class C common stock, non-voting; $.001 par value; authorized,
600,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 536,865 shares -- 1
Warrants outstanding -- 5,119
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.:
Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized, 1,000 shares; issued
and outstanding, 1 share -- --
Additional paid-in-capital -- 158,510
Accumulated deficit -- (230,004)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (673) (3,682)
----------- -----------
Total members' interest/stockholders' deficit (110,981) (70,055)
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and members' interest/stockholders' deficit $ 1,415,418 $ 888,065
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
52
<PAGE> 53
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED/COMBINED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' INTEREST/STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
For the Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, the Period From
January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 And the
Period From August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999
(in thousands of dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Bar Technologies Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series B Class A Class B Class C
Members' Preferred Common Common Common Warrants
Interest Stock Stock Stock Stock Outstanding
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1997 $ 1 $ 5,119
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
Preferred stock dividend
Issuance of common stock $ 1
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1997 -- -- 1 1 5,119
Initial capitalization of Republic
as of September 8, 1998
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
Minimum pension liability
adjustment
Preferred stock dividends
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1998 -- -- 1 1 5,119
Net loss
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
Minimum pension liability
adjustment
Preferred stock dividends
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------
Balance, August 12, 1999 -- -- 1 1 5,119
Exchange of members' interest to
effect combination $ 102,968 (1) (1) (5,119)
Net loss (213,276)
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1999 $(110,308) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
========= ========= ========= ======== ========= ========
<CAPTION>
Republic Total
Engineered Accumulated Members'
Steels, Inc. Additional Other Interest/
Common Paid-In Accumulated Comprehensive Stockholders' Comprehensive
Stock Capital Deficit Income (Loss) Deficit Income (Loss)
--------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1997 $ 33,706 $ (70,853) $ (131) $ (32,158)
Net loss (44,823) (44,823) $ (44,823)
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (363) (363) (363)
Preferred stock dividend (385) (385)
Issuance of common stock 29,349 29,350
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1997 63,055 (116,061) (494) (48,379) $ (45,186)
===========
Initial capitalization of Republic
as of September 8, 1998 $ -- 95,455 95,455
Net loss (113,558) (113,558) $ (113,558)
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (697) (697) (697)
Minimum pension liability
adjustment (2,491) (2,491) (2,491)
Preferred stock dividends (385) (385)
--------- --------- -------- --------- ---------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1998 -- 158,510 (230,004) (3,682) (70,055) $ (116,746)
===========
Net loss (114,913) (114,913) $ (114,913)
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 157 157 157
Minimum pension liability
adjustment 2,491 2,491 2,491
Preferred stock dividends (224) (224)
--------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -----------
Balance, August 12, 1999 -- 158,510 (345,141) (1,034) (182,544) $ (112,265)
===========
Exchange of members' interest to
effect combination (158,510) 345,141 284,478
Net loss (213,276) $ (213,276)
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 361 361 361
--------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1999 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (673) $(110,981) $ (212,915)
========= ========= ======== ========= ========= ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated/combined
financial statements.
53
<PAGE> 54
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED/COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIODS FROM AUGUST 13, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
JANUARY 1, 1999 TO AUGUST 12, 1999 AND THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
The Company- The Predecessor - Combined
Consolidated -------------------------------------------------
Period From Period From
August 13, 1999 January 1, Year Ended Year Ended
to 1999 to December 31, December 31,
December 31,1999 August 12, 1999 1998 1997
------------------ ---------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $(213,276) $(114,913) $(113,558) $ (44,823)
Adjustments to reconcile net cash used
in operating activities:
Extraordinary loss from early
extinguishment of debt 23,874 -- -- --
Depreciation and amortization 23,170 21,889 16,120 4,523
Accretion of original issue discount 879 5,750 1,393 1,243
Amortization of deferred financing cost 4,138 1,483 2,819 2,131
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable 70,712 (61,295) (5,393) (16,148)
(Increase) decrease in inventory (6,744) (6,645) 6,992 (462)
(Increase) decrease in other current assets 10,052 (3,237) (9,564) 1,159
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (81,847) 111,959 8,345 6,504
Increase (decrease) in accrued
compensation and benefits (1,290) 2,774 17,498 --
Increase (decrease) in defined benefit
pension 16,130 (3,140) 17,841 --
Increase (decrease) in other
postretirement benefits 8,348 14,720 6,070 --
Increase (decrease) in accrued
environmental liabilities 1,489 1,805 (689) --
Increase (decrease) in other current
liabilities 9,082 (3,349) 12,942 (4,051)
Other (3,567) (23,228) 12,909 (930)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (138,850) (55,427) (26,275) (50,854)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures (9,679) (21,788) (18,474) (5,813)
Acquisition, net of cash acquired 14,621 -- (154,260) --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES 4,942 (21,788) (172,734) (5,813)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt 419,950 387 83,780 324
Net proceeds under revolving credit
facilities 272,025 80,816 25,350 13,850
Repayments of long-term debt (685,131) (3,277) (2,405) (2,588)
Preferred stock dividends -- (224) (385) (385)
Deferred financing costs (30,274) -- -- --
Proceeds from capital contributions 155,025 -- 95,455 29,350
Other financing activities - net -- -- -- 12,836
--------- --------- --------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 131,595 77,702 201,795 53,387
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 358 157 (229) (363)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS (1,955) 644 2,557 (3,643)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period 6,592 5,948 3,391 7,034
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period $ 4,637 $ 6,592 $ 5,948 $ 3,391
========= ========= ========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts
capitalized $ 26,329 $ 41,224 $ 20,584 $ 18,957
========= ========= ========= =========
Cash paid for income taxes, net $ 128 $ 156 $ 196 --
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
54
<PAGE> 55
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIODS FROM AUGUST 13, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND JANUARY 1, 1999 TO
AUGUST 12, 1999 AND THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS, ORGANIZATION AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION
Republic Technologies International Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries ("RTI" or the
"Company") manufactures and markets special bar quality ("SBQ") steel
products. SBQ steel products are high quality hot-rolled and cold-finished
carbon and alloy steel bars and rods used primarily in critical applications in
automotive and industrial equipment. The Company produces a wide range of SBQ
steel products and supplies a diverse customer base that includes leading
automobile and industrial equipment manufacturers and their first tier
suppliers.
The Company was formed in a combination completed on August 13, 1999 (the
"Combination"). The Combination was completed through a series of mergers, asset
transfers and related steps as set forth in a Master Restructuring Agreement
among Bar Technologies Inc. ("BarTech"), Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.
("Republic"), USS/Kobe Steel Company and various of their affiliates. Following
the Combination, RTI, a newly formed legal entity, directly or indirectly owns
and operates all of the assets of BarTech, Republic and USS/Kobe Steel Company's
SBQ steel products business ("USS/Kobe").
BarTech and Republic have been operated under common management and ownership
control since prior to the Combination. The consolidated financial statements of
RTI are being presented from the date of the Combination. Comparative combined
financial statements are being presented for BarTech and Republic for the
periods that they were under common control prior to the Combination (the
"Predecessor").
Republic has been under common management and control since September 8, 1998,
the date acquired. The acquisition of Republic has been accounted for as a
purchase. The combining of BarTech and Republic in the Combination is being
accounted for as a common control merger like a pooling of interests. The
acquisition of USS/Kobe as part of the Combination is being accounted for as a
purchase. See Note 4 for additional information related to the common control
combination of BarTech and Republic and information related to the acquisitions
of Republic and USS/Kobe.
The Company and the individual companies included in the Combination, BarTech,
Republic and USS/Kobe, have historically incurred substantial losses. As a
result of the Combination, the Company has substantial indebtedness and is
highly leveraged. The Company's future performance is subject to the success of
its consolidation plan pursuant to which the Company expects to create a more
efficient, higher quality network of production facilities operated by a smaller
and more flexible workforce. The success of the consolidation plan will depend
on many factors including the Company's ability to rationalize its production
facilities and headcount, enhance the productivity of its remaining facilities
through facility specialization and targeted capital investment, eliminate
redundant overhead costs and produce internally more raw materials currently
purchased from third parties. The Company's future success will also depend on
general economic conditions and financial and competitive, regulatory, labor and
other factors, many of which are unforeseen and beyond the Company's control.
The Company's performance during the third and fourth quarters of 1999 was
below expectations, causing the Company's liquidity to be negatively affected.
The Company's liquidity position has also been negatively impacted by the
implementation of the Company's consolidation plan as a result of the time lag
between the incurrence of certain costs and the receipt of the expected cash
flow benefits, such as in the case of headcount reductions requiring lump sum
payouts. The Company's net availability on its revolving credit facility at
April 30, 2000 was $16.5 million.
Management has sought to improve the Company's liquidity position by taking a
number of actions including, increasing spot prices, reducing administrative
staff, aggressive cost cutting programs, scaling back operations at its
Johnstown facility and reducing inventories. The Company has also reduced its
planned capital expenditures from $48 million to $19 million for 2000, has
obtained deferrals of $11 million of certain quarterly PBGC funding requirements
until July 2000, obtained deferrals of trade credit from a significant supplier
from June through October 2000, and obtained a deferral from the Ohio EPA of
$1.2 million of committed environmental expenditures until 2001. Management is
also pursuing additional financing from the State of Ohio.
The Company is in the process of selling its specialty steels division and
expects to complete the sale in the second quarter 2000 (see Note 16). The
Company is also in the process of selling certain real estate and assets from
facilities closed as part of the consolidation plan.
Notwithstanding these efforts, the Company may need to obtain additional
financing to meet its cash flow requirements, including financing through the
sale of additional debt or equity securities. Restrictive covenants included in
the indenture relating to the senior secured notes and other debt obligations
limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, or sell assets
(most of which are pledged), and may otherwise limit the operational and
financial flexibility of the Company. The ability to sell its assets may also
be constrained by the provisions of the Company's new labor agreement.
55
<PAGE> 56
NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPALS OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated/combined financial statements contain results for
BarTech for the years ended December 31, 1999, January 2, 1999 and January 3,
1998, the results for Republic for the year ended December 31, 1999 and for the
period from September 8, 1998 to December 31, 1998, and the results for USS/Kobe
for the period from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999. To conform to the
predecessors' fiscal periods for presentation purposes, the years ended closest
to December 31, 1998 and 1997 were used herein. Prior period results are not
comparable with the current periods due to the acquisitions of Republic on
September 8, 1998 and USS/Kobe on August 13, 1999.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RTI and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. The combined financial statements include the accounts of
BarTech and its wholly owned subsidiaries and Republic and its wholly owned
subsidiaries for the periods that they were under common control prior to the
Combination. All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The Company operates in three separate segments: hot-rolled, cold-finished and
specialty steels. In connection with the acquisition of Republic, the Company
determined its intent to sell the specialty steels segment of the business. The
Company manages the reportable segments as separate strategic business units.
Differences between the segments include manufacturing techniques and equipment,
competition and end-users. The Company is in the process of selling its
specialty steels division. The accompanying consolidated/combined financial
statements reflect the specialty division as a discontinued business in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30. See Note 16 for
further information related to discontinued operations.
The combination of USS/Kobe into RTI and the Republic acquisition were accounted
for as purchases as of their respective acquisition dates. Under purchase
accounting, the total purchase price of Republic has been allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values as
of September 8, 1998. The total purchase price of USS/Kobe has been allocated to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of August 13, 1999, based on
their respective fair values and certain preliminary valuations and other
studies resulting in a reduction in property, plant and equipment for the excess
of the fair value of the net assets of USS/Kobe over the purchase price (i.e.,
purchase discount). See Note 4 for further information related to business
combinations.
NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The Company considers all short-term investments
with maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
INVENTORIES - Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market (net
realizable value). Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost
and include improvements that significantly extend the useful lives of existing
plant and equipment. The Company provides for depreciation of property, plant
and equipment on the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives
of the assets. The range of estimated useful lives of the Company's assets are
as follows:
Buildings and improvements 20 - 40 years
Machinery and equipment 3 - 30 years
Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Capital expenditures
that are not able to be put into use immediately are included in
construction-in-process. As these projects are completed, they are
56
<PAGE> 57
transferred to depreciable assets. Net gains or losses related to asset
dispositions are recognized in the Company's operating results in the period in
which the disposition occurs.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill, trademarks,
patented and unpatented technology and other intangible assets arising from the
acquisitions of BarTech and Republic by Blackstone Capital Partners II Merchant
Banking Fund L.P. and its affiliates (together, "Blackstone") and Veritas
Capital Fund, L.P. and its affiliates (together, "Veritas"). Goodwill is being
amortized over the period of expected benefit of 40 years. Other acquisition
related intangible assets are being amortized over the period of expected
benefit ranging from 28 months to 40 years. Intangible assets also include
deferred loan and bond fees. The deferred loan and bond fees are being amortized
using the effective interest rate method over the lives of the related debt
instruments.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS - Long-lived assets, consisting of property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceed the recovery amount or fair value, as
defined, of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
INCOME TAXES - The Company is a limited liability company that is treated
similar to a partnership for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and,
accordingly, has no income tax provision or deferred income tax assets or
liabilities related to these jurisdictions. Amounts for income taxes consist
primarily of a provision for foreign taxes relating to the Company's Canadian
subsidiary, Canadian Drawn Steel Company, Inc. ("CDSC") Prior to the
Combination, the Predecessor accounted for income taxes pursuant to the asset
and liability method.
ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS - The Company and other steel companies have in recent years
become subject to increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations. It
is the policy of the Company to endeavor to comply with applicable environmental
laws and regulations. The Company established a liability for an amount which
the Company believes is adequate, based on information currently available, to
cover costs of remedial actions it will likely be required to take to comply
with existing environmental laws and regulations.
The recorded amounts represent an estimate of the environmental remediation
costs associated with future events triggering or confirming the costs that, in
management's judgment, are likely to occur. This estimate is based on currently
available facts, existing technology, and presently enacted laws and
regulations, and it takes into consideration the likely effects of inflation and
other societal and economic factors. The precise timing of such events cannot be
reliably determined at this time due to absence of any deadlines for remediation
under the applicable environmental laws and regulations pursuant to which such
remediation costs will be expended. No claims for recovery are netted against
the stated amount.
MEMBERS' INTEREST - The Company has three classes of member interest units:
Class A, Class B and Class C. Class A units consisting of 1,100 units, have a
stated value of $5,000 per unit and carry a preferred return of $350 per unit.
Class B units, consisting of 1,000 units, have no stated value and are
allocated all net income/losses after preferred returns have been allocated.
Class C, consisting of 30,000 units, have a stated value of $1,000 per unit
and carry a preferred return of 5% of stated value. Both Class A and C units
have distribution and dissolution preferences ahead of Class B units. The
following is a summary of members' interest activity during the period from
August 13, 1999 through December 31, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Class A Class B Class C Total
Units Units Units Members' Interest
------- --------- ------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Members' interest
August 13, 1999 $5,500 $67,468 $30,000 $102,968
Preferred return 161 (786) 625 --
Net loss (213,276) (213,276)
------- --------- ------- -----------------
Members' interest
December 31, 1999 $5,661 $(146,594) $30,625 $(110,308)
======= ========= ======= =================
</TABLE>
REVENUE RECOGNITION - The Company records revenues at the time the product is
shipped to its customers. Sales are made with no right of return.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION - Asset and liability accounts of the Company's
foreign subsidiary, CDSC, are translated into U. S. dollars using current
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense
accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. Translation
adjustments are reflected as a component of members' interest/stockholders'
deficit.
Transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated/combined
statements of operations as incurred. These amounts were not significant in all
periods presented.
USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
57
<PAGE> 58
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In preparation of the consolidated/combined financial statements included
herein, the Company uses estimates for, among others, defined benefit pension
obligations, other postretirement benefit obligations, environmental
remediation, fair value adjustments related to the acquisition of USS/Kobe and
loss on discontinued operation, all of which are significant to the
consolidated/combined financial statements taken as a whole. Changes in
circumstances in the near term could have an impact on these estimates, and the
change in estimate could have a material effect on the consolidated/combined
financial statements.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT - In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and for Hedging Activities," ("SFAS
133"). This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring
that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an
asset or liability measured at fair value. SFAS 133 requires that changes in the
fair value of derivatives be recognized currently in earnings unless specific
hedge accounting criteria are met. SFAS 133, as amended, is effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2000, and cannot be applied retroactively. The
Company has not completed its evaluation of SFAS 133 and, accordingly, is unable
to determine what impact, if any, SFAS 133 will have on its financial
statements.
RECLASSIFICATIONS - Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period
financial statements to conform to current period presentation.
NOTE 4 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On August 13, 1999, the Combination of BarTech, Republic and USS/Kobe was
completed. The Combination occurred through a series of mergers, asset transfers
and related steps that resulted in the formation of the Company. Assuming
exercise of outstanding warrants and conversion of outstanding convertible
preferred stock of the Company's parent and exchange of Members' Interests by
USX Corporation ("USX") and Kobe Steel, Ltd. ("Kobe"), Blackstone and Veritas
indirectly own approximately 51.5 percent of the newly combined operations,
while USX and Kobe each indirectly own approximately 15 percent of the newly
combined operations. In conjunction with the Combination, the Company entered
into a new credit facility and applied proceeds from borrowings under this new
credit facility, together with proceeds of an offering of the senior secured
notes and warrants, including warrants sold separately from the senior secured
notes concurrent with the Combination, and new equity contributions, to
refinance a substantial portion of the indebtedness of Republic, RES Holding
(Republic's parent) BarTech and USS/Kobe. The combination of BarTech and
Republic is being accounted for as a common control merger like a pooling of
interests.
Combined and separate results of BarTech and Republic during the periods
preceding the Combination, while under common control, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BarTech Republic Adjustment Combined
-------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Period from January 1, 1999
to August 12, 1999:
Net sales $152,494 $360,377 -- $512,871
Net loss (25,279) (89,634) -- (114,913)
Year ended December 31, 1998:
Net sales $271,851 $200,719 -- $472,570
Net loss (41,978) (47,277) $(24,303) (113,558)
</TABLE>
58
<PAGE> 59
The combined financial results presented above include adjustments made to
conform accounting policies of the two companies. The only adjustment impacting
net loss was the restatement of Republic's cost of goods sold to change the
inventory accounting policy from last-in, first-out (LIFO) to first-in,
first-out (FIFO).
In connection with the combination of BarTech and Republic, the Company recorded
one-time charges for investment banking and professional fees in the period from
August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999 of approximately $7,900. The transaction
costs related to the acquisition of USS/Kobe are included in the purchase price.
The Company also recorded an extraordinary loss for call and tender offer
premiums, prepayment penalties and write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs associated with the retirement of various borrowings of BarTech and
Republic refinanced in connection with the Combination during the period from
August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999 of $23,874.
Blackstone and Veritas acquired control of Republic on September 8, 1998 for a
price of $7.25 per share of Republic common stock with the intent of combining
BarTech and Republic, subject to a refinancing of the combined companies' debt.
The purchase price totaled approximately $154,260, including transaction related
expenses and net of cash acquired of $4,041. RES Holding and its wholly owned
subsidiary, RES Acquisition were formed for the purpose of acquiring Republic.
The source of funds contributed to RES Acquisition consisted of (i) a capital
contribution of $95,455 by RES Holding representing proceeds from the issuance
of its common stock to Blackstone, Veritas and HVR Holdings, L.L.C. and (ii)
borrowings of approximately $65,046 under an RES Holding credit facility. RES
Acquisition acquired control of Republic on September 8, 1998 and RES
Acquisition merged with and into Republic on September 21, 1998.
The acquisition of Republic has been accounted for as a purchase and, pursuant
to the provisions of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 54 ("SAB No. 54") and the
rules of pushdown accounting, the acquisition gave rise to a new basis of
accounting. The purchase price and related acquisition expenses exceeded the
fair value of net assets acquired by $72,557 and has been recognized as
goodwill, which is being amortized over 40 years. The results of Republic's
operations are included in the consolidated/combined financial statements from
its September 8, 1998 acquisition date.
The acquisition of USS/Kobe has also been accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. The purchase price for USS/Kobe totaled approximately
$102,743, including transaction costs and net of cash acquired of $14,621.
Consideration in the transaction included equity to the sellers valued at
approximately $83,756 and seller debt assumed of $23,844. Under purchase
accounting, the total purchase cost is allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed of USS/Kobe based on their respective fair values as of
August 12, 1999, based on valuations and other studies that are not yet
finalized. The actual allocation of purchase price and the resulting effect on
income from operations may differ significantly from these preliminary
estimates. The excess of the fair value of the net assets of USS/Kobe over the
purchase price (i.e., purchase discount) of $5,445 has been recorded as a
reduction of property, plant and equipment.
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities
assumed based upon the fair values on the date of the acquisition as follows:
59
<PAGE> 60
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Republic USS/Kobe
--------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Purchase price:
Cash consideration $ 143,901
Fair value of equity consideration $ 83,756
Additional seller debt assumed 23,844
Acquisition fees and expenses 14,401 9,764
--------------------- ---------------------
Total purchase price 158,302 117,364
Book value of net assets acquired 85,100 206,859
--------------------- ---------------------
Excess purchase price over (discount from) book value
of net assets acquired 73,202 (89,495)
Allocation of purchase price:
Increase in inventory (16,980) (3,290)
Decrease in prepaids and other current assets 1,077
(Increase) decrease in property, plant and equipment (6,729) 6,838
(Increase) decrease in intangibles and other assets (39,352) 2,475
Decrease in deferred tax asset 54,829
Decrease in accounts payable (217)
Increase in accrued expenses 10,848 3,888
Increase in defined benefit pension obligation 41,357 26,247
(Decrease) increase in other postretirement benefits (45,344) 47,032
Other, net 726
--------------------- ---------------------
Goodwill (purchase discount) $ 72,557 $ (5,445)
===================== =====================
</TABLE>
The following pro forma information presents the consolidated results of
operations assuming the Combination was completed as of the beginning of January
1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
(in millions) 1999 1998
------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 1,307.4 $ 1,567.5
Cost of goods sold 1,302.7 1,464.8
---------- ----------
Gross profit (loss) 4.7 102.7
Selling, general and administrative
expense 95.1 94.2
Depreciation and amortization expense 64.2 75.5
Workforce reduction charges 77.2 18.7
Other (income) expense, net 7.7 (3.3)
---------- ----------
Operating loss (239.5) (82.4)
Interest expense, net 102.4 97.9
Provision for income taxes -- --
---------- ----------
Net loss from continuing operations $ (341.9) $ (180.3)
========== ==========
</TABLE>
NOTE 5 - INVENTORIES
The components of inventories are as follows:
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
----------------- -----------------
Raw materials and supplies $ 64,055 $ 28,506
Semi-finished and finished goods 220,613 172,803
----------------- -----------------
Total $ 284,668 $ 201,309
================= =================
At December 31, 1999 and 1998, inventories are net of market reserves and
obsolescence reserves aggregating $13,585 and $2,364, respectively.
60
<PAGE> 61
NOTE 6 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill $ 85,417 $ 12,859
Excess purchase price over net assets acquired -- 147,652
Patented and unpatented technology 55,300 --
Intangible pension asset -- 171
Deferred loan and bond fees 33,965 23,151
--------- ---------
174,682 183,833
Less accumulated amortization (11,203) (10,456)
--------- ---------
Total $ 163,479 $ 173,377
========= =========
</TABLE>
61
<PAGE> 62
NOTE 7 - LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt of the Company consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1999 1998
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Republic Technologies International, LLC:
13 3/4% Senior Secured Notes, due 2009 $425,000
Johnstown Enterprise Grant, interest rate at 3% 428
Former Republic:
9% Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 1996, due June 2021 53,700 $ 53,700
8 1/4% Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 1994, due October 1, 2014 20,200 20,200
9 7/8% First Mortgage Notes, due December 15, 2001 -- 203,615
Republic Revolving Credit Agreement -- 13,700
Other -- 5,506
Former BarTech:
13 1/2% Senior Secured Notes, due April 1, 2001 -- 91,609
Sunny Day Fund I ( "SDF I "), interest rate at 3.0%, due
October 1, 2009 -- 6,491
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority Note ( "PIDA I "),
interest rate at 2.0%, due October 1, 2009 -- 1,646
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority Note ( "PIDA II "),
interest rate at 3.0%, due March 1, 2011 -- 1,797
Business Infrastructure Development ( "BID ") Program, interest rate at
3.0%, due April 1, 2001 2,258 2,500
Economic Development Partnership ( "EDP I "), interest rate
at 3.0%, due October 1, 2009 5,707 5,707
Economic Development Partnership ( "EDP II "), interest rate
at 3.0%, due July 1, 2010 1,300 1,300
Economic Development Partnership ( "EDP III "), interest rate at 3.0%,
due December 1, 2007 3,000 3,000
Community Development Block Grant Program ("CDBG"),
interest rate at 3.0%, due July 1, 2010 618 690
Housing and Urban Development 108 ( "HUD ") Bonds, interest rates
between 6.6% and 8.2%, due on various dates from July 15, 2000
to September 26, 2003 4,500 5,750
Marine Midland Term Loan, interest rate at Prime or LIBOR
plus 1.0%, due March 1, 2003 -- 6,929
RDC Loan, interest rate at 7.75%, due July 1, 2004 -- 411
Bethlehem Subordinated Note, interest rate at 7.0%, due September 26, 2002 -- 5,500
Industrial Revenue Bond ( "IRB "), interest rate is variable, calculated
weekly, representing minimum rate required to sell bonds in a
secondary market, due December 1, 2018 3,600 3,600
Former USS/Kobe:
Environmental Bonds:
1984 Series, interest due monthly at a variable rate based on the
average of thirty-day yield evaluations at par of not less than
twenty issuers of tax-exempt securities, principal due
December 2001 9,000
1995 Series, variable rate tax-exempt securities, principal
due November 2015 4,745
-------- --------
534,056 433,651
Less original issue discount 50,603 4,163
Less current maturities 2,391 7,005
-------- --------
Long-term debt $481,062 $422,483
======== ========
</TABLE>
62
<PAGE> 63
13 3/4% SENIOR SECURED NOTES
On August 13, 1999, Republic Technologies and its subsidiary, RTI Capital Corp.,
co-issued senior secured obligations amounting to $425,000 aggregate principal
amount maturing on July 15, 2009 ("Senior Secured Notes") in a private offering.
Interest on the Senior Secured Notes is payable semi-annually on each January 15
and July 15, commencing January 15, 2000, to the holders of record of Senior
Secured Notes at the close of business on January 1 and July 1 immediately
preceding such interest payment date.
The Senior Secured Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of
the issuers, at any time on or after July 15, 2004, at the redemption prices,
which are expressed as percentages of principal amount, set forth below, plus
accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to the redemption
date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on the years indicated
below:
YEAR PERCENTAGE
2004 106.875%
2005 105.156%
2006 103.438%
2007 101.719%
2008 and thereafter 100.000%
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to July 15, 2002, the
issuers may, at their option, following one or more Public Equity Offerings (as
defined in the indenture related to the Senior Secured Notes (the "Indenture"))
redeem up to an aggregate of 35% of the principal amount of notes originally
issued from the holders, on a pro rata basis, at a redemption price equal to
113.750% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and
liquidated damages, if any, to the date of redemption; provided at least 65%
aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes would remain outstanding
immediately after giving effect to any such redemption; provided, further, that
if the Public Equity Offering is by Republic Technologies, the Company or any
other direct or indirect parent company of the Company, the net proceeds thereof
shall have been contributed to Republic Technologies or used to buy Capital
Stock (other than Disqualified Capital Stock) (as such terms are defined in the
Indenture) of Republic Technologies on or prior to the date of redemption.
The Senior Secured Notes are initially secured by, subject to exceptions and
limitations, (1) a first priority lien on, and security interest in,
substantially all of the real and personal properties of the Company and its
restricted subsidiaries, other than real and personal property located at the
CAST-ROLL and Cartersville, Georgia facilities and inventory, accounts
receivable, intellectual property and related assets and (2) a first priority
lien, shared on an equal and ratable basis with the lenders of Republic
Technologies' new credit facility, on Republic Technologies' equity interests
and its restricted subsidiaries. Collateral is subject to release without
substitution under a number of circumstances. The Senior Secured Notes contain
affirmative and negative covenants including provisions for restrictions on
additional borrowings, certain investments, certain payments, sale or
disposition of assets, payment of dividends and change of control provisions.
The Senior Secured Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior
basis, jointly and severally, by the Company and by all of Republic Technologies
International, LLC's subsidiaries, except for RTI Capital Corp., a co-issuer of
the securities, and Oberlin Insurance Company ("OIC"). The Company has no assets
other than its investment in Republic Technologies International, LLC. Separate
condensed consolidating financial information of the guarantor subsidiaries and
non-guarantor subsidiaries is not presented as the non-issuer, non-guarantor
subsidiary represents less than one percent of the Company's assets and revenues
and the Company believes that such information is not material to investors.
FORMER REPUBLIC LOAN AGREEMENTS
On June 1, 1996, Republic obtained $53,700 of financing through the issuance of
9% Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 1996, due June 1, 2021 in connection with
the solid waste disposal facilities installed at its Canton facility. These
bonds were issued in addition to the Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 1994
noted
63
<PAGE> 64
below, to assist in financing the facilities. As of December 31, 1999 and 1998,
Republic had available $351 and $337, respectively, of the $53,700 which is
classified as long-term restricted cash in the accompanying
consolidated/combined balance sheets.
On October 28, 1994, Republic obtained $20,200 of financing through the issuance
of 8 1/4% Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 1994, due October 1, 2014 in
connection with the solid waste disposal facilities installed at the Canton
facility.
On December 15, 1993, Republic issued $200,000 aggregate principal amount of 9
7/8 percent First Mortgage Notes due December 15, 2001 ("First Mortgage Notes")
in an underwritten public offering. The First Mortgage Notes were redeemable, in
whole or in part, at the option of Republic, on or after December 15, 1999 at
specified premiums. The First Mortgage Notes were secured by a mortgage on
substantially all of Republic's property, plant and equipment as of December 15,
1993.
As a result of the acquisition of Republic, Republic was required by the terms
of the indenture for the First Mortgage Notes to offer to purchase any and all
of the First Mortgage Notes at a purchase price of $1,010 per $1,000 principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (the "Change of Control Offer"). On
October 5, 1998, Republic commenced the Change of Control Offer, which expired
on November 5, 1998. Approximately $28,100 million principal amount of First
Mortgage Notes was tendered with the Change of Control Offer. The purchase of
the tender notes was assigned to affiliates of the Lenders (as defined below).
On October 29, 1998, Republic commenced a new offer to purchase any and all of
the outstanding First Mortgage Notes at a purchase price of $1,042.30 per $1,000
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest (the "Offer"). The Offer
expired on June 30, 1999. Republic accrued the offer premium over the period of
the Offer. For the purpose of funding the Change of Control Offer and the Offer,
Republic entered into an additional senior credit facility (the "Bridge
Facility") with Chase, DLJ Bridge Finance, Inc. and BankBoston N. A. (the
"Lenders") which provided for up to $208,500 of borrowings. Republic utilized
the Bridge Facility to purchase and retire all of the First Mortgage Notes on
June 30, 1999. The Bridge Facility was then repaid with proceeds of the
financing completed concurrent with the Combination.
Effective April 25, 1997, Republic amended and restated its revolving credit
facility ("Republic Revolving Credit Agreement"). The amended and restated
Republic Revolving Credit Agreement permitted borrowings up to $115,000 and was
secured by Republic's receivables, inventories, stock of a subsidiary,
short-term investments and certain intangible assets.
The Republic Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended in November 1998, provided
up to $50,000 for letters of credit. Borrowings under the Republic Revolving
Credit Agreement bore interest at a per annum rate equal to, at Republic's
option, (i) the higher of the base rate of BankBoston and 1/2% above the Federal
Funds effective rate plus 1/4%; or (ii) LIBOR plus 2 1/4%. The borrowing base
under the Republic Revolving Credit Agreement was the sum of 55% of eligible
inventory (as defined) up to a maximum of $75,000 and 85% of eligible accounts
receivable (as defined). Fees of 2 1/2% per annum on the maximum drawing amount
of each standby or documentary letter of credit were payable on the date of
issuance of such letter of credit.
On May 6, 1999, the Republic Revolving Credit Agreement was once again amended
(the "Amended Republic Agreement") to reflect the formation of Republic
Technologies International Marketing LLC ("Marketing JV"), a marketing joint
venture owned in equal proportions by Republic and BarTech. Under the Amended
Republic Agreement, the Marketing JV became a co-borrower and all borrowings
were secured additionally by the receivables of the Marketing JV. Under the
terms of the Marketing JV
64
<PAGE> 65
agreement, Republic purchased all the receivables of the Marketing JV on a
discounted basis as sales were made to customers. The Amended Republic Agreement
provided a temporary increase to permitted borrowings from $115,000 to $135,000
until December 31, 1999. The Amended Republic Agreement also provided up to
$50,000 for letters of credit. Interest rates on borrowings under the Amended
Republic Agreement were increased for base rate loans to base rate plus 3/4% and
for LIBOR rate plus 2 3/4%. Fees for standby or documentary letters of credit
were increased to 2 3/4%. As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, there were no
outstanding letters of credit.
As of December 31, 1998, amounts outstanding under the Republic Revolving Credit
Agreement were $13,700. The Republic Revolving Credit Agreement was extinguished
on August 13, 1999 with proceeds from the financing completed concurrent with
the Combination. The Marketing JV was terminated as a result of the Combination.
FORMER BARTECH SENIOR SECURED NOTES
BarTech's 13 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due April 1, 2001, consisting of $91,609
in aggregate principal amount at December 31, 1998 (the "BarTech Senior Secured
Notes"), were fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis, jointly
and severally, by BarTech's wholly-owned subsidiary, BLI and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, CDSC. The subsidiary guarantors comprised all of the direct and
indirect subsidiaries of BarTech. In connection with the Combination, BarTech
initiated a redemption of the BarTech Senior Secured Notes at a purchase price
of 106.75% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The
BarTech Senior Secured Notes were defeased concurrent with the Combination
pending completion of the redemption. Funds for this defeasance were obtained
from proceeds from the financing completed concurrent with the Combination. The
redemption of the BarTech Senior Secured Notes was completed on September 13,
1999.
In connection with the BarTech Senior Secured Notes, warrants were issued which
entitled the holders thereof to acquire an aggregate of 91,609 shares of Class A
Common Stock. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.01 per share and, as
a result of the completion of the Combination, are exercisable to purchase
shares of Class A common stock of Republic Technologies International, Inc., the
indirect parent of the Company. The warrants became exercisable on April 1, 2000
and will expire on April 1, 2001.
BARTECH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCING
In connection with the acquisition of the assets of The Bethlehem Steel Company
("Bethlehem") Bar, Rod and Wire Division and its original modernization and
expansion plan, BarTech entered into loan agreements with lenders in
Pennsylvania and New York to procure a portion of the financing for the
transaction.
PENNSYLVANIA
BarTech entered into the Master Agreement with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
and various of its agencies (collectively, the "Commonwealth") on July 18, 1994.
Pursuant to the Master Agreement, BarTech entered into loan agreements with the
Commonwealth, through its Department of Commerce and Department of Community
Affairs. The total amount committed to BarTech by the Commonwealth pursuant to
the Master Agreement was $33,000. The loans have been made through the Sunny Day
Fund ("SDF"), the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority ("PIDA"), the
Business Infrastructure Development Program ("BID"), the Economic Development
Partnership ("EDP") and the Community Development Block Grant Program ("CDBG").
BarTech has obtained approval from the Pennsylvania Industrial Development
Authority regarding the deferral of principal on its PIDA and BID loans, and
principal and interest deferral on its EDP loans. BarTech must resume principal
payments related to PIDA and BID loans and principal and interest payments
related to EDP loans beginning January 2000. All deferred loans are required to
be amortized over their original maturity schedule with no deferral of final
maturity. As of December 31, 1999 was not in compliance with the payments of
principal and interest related to its EDP loans. The Company subsequently
brought its payments current and received a waiver from its lender.
As of December 31, 1999 and, 1998, $12,883 and $23,131, respectively, in
aggregate principal amount of Commonwealth Loans were outstanding.
65
<PAGE> 66
NEW YORK
JDA Guaranteed Marine Midland Term Loan--BarTech was party to a Loan and Use
Agreement, dated September 21, 1994, with Marine Midland Bank ("Marine Midland")
(the "Marine Midland Loan"), whereby Marine Midland loaned $10,000 to BarTech
for use in connection with the acquisition of Lackawanna, New York real estate
from Bethlehem. The Marine Midland Loan was guaranteed by the New York Job
Development Authority ("JDA"). Interest on the Marine Midland Loan was prime
rate, or the LIBOR rate plus one percent, as determined by BarTech. The Marine
Midland Loan was extinguished with proceeds from the financing completed
concurrent with the Combination.
RDC Loan--BarTech was party to a Loan Agreement with the Buffalo and Erie County
Regional Development Corporation ("RDC") providing for a loan in the amount of
$500 to be used by BarTech for working capital needs (the "RDC Loan"). The RDC
Loan had an interest rate of 7.75% per annum until July 1, 1999, and had an
adjustable rate thereafter. The RDC Loan was secured by a Security Agreement,
which granted RDC a security interest in equipment, fixtures, inventory,
accounts receivable, chattel paper and general intangibles. The RDC Loan was
extinguished with proceeds from the financing completed concurrent with the
Combination.
BETHLEHEM SUBORDINATED LOAN AGREEMENT
BarTech entered into $5,500 Subordinated Loan Agreement, dated September 21,
1994, with Bethlehem (the "Bethlehem Loan"). The terms of the agreement provided
for three equal installments on the first day of October in each of the years
2000, 2001 and 2002 at a rate of 7.0% per annum and was due on September 26,
2002. The Bethlehem Loan was secured by a subordinated security interest in
certain real and personal property of BarTech and any and all proceeds
therefrom. The Bethlehem Loan was extinguished with proceeds from the financing
completed concurrent with the Combination.
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS
In December 1988, the Development Authority of Cartersville, Georgia issued
$3,600 in aggregate principal amount of its tax exempt industrial revenue bonds,
or "IRBs," the proceeds of which were loaned to BarTech's Bliss & Laughlin
subsidiary and used to partially fund the construction and equipping of Bliss &
Laughlin's Cartersville, Georgia facility. The Cartersville IRBs bear interest
at a rate equal to the minimum rate of interest which, in the opinion of the
remarketing agent for the Cartersville IRBs, would be necessary to sell
Cartersville IRBs in the secondary market. The interest rates paid on the
Cartersville IRBs varied from 2.65% to 5.90% during 1999 and was 5.90% at
December 31, 1999. Principal payments of $300 are due on the Cartersville IRBs
on each December 1 beginning in 2009 and continuing through 2012. Thereafter,
payments of $400 are due on each December 1 until the final payment on December
1, 2018. The Cartersville IRBs are secured by Bliss & Laughlin's Cartersville,
Georgia facility and the equipment located at the facility. As of December 31,
1999 and 1998, $3,600 of indebtedness was outstanding under the Cartersville
IRBs.
The Chase Manhattan Bank ("Chase") has issued an irrevocable transferable letter
of credit to secure payment of the principal of, interest on and the purchase
price of the Cartersville IRBs, in a stated amount equal to the principal on the
Cartersville IRBs, plus an amount equal to 210 days of interest on the
Cartersville IRBs at a rate of 12% per year. Draws on the letter of credit are
secured by a first priority lien on bonds purchased as a result of the draw
pursuant to the terms of the reimbursement agreement and a pledge and security
agreement entered into between Bliss & Laughlin and Chase.
USS/KOBE ENVIRONMENTAL BONDS
1984 EIRBS
In December 1984, the Ohio Water Development Authority issued $9,000 in
aggregate principal amount of tax exempt variable rate demand environmental
improvement revenue bonds, or "1984 EIRBs," the proceeds of which were loaned to
USX and used to finance the cost of pollution control equipment at the Lorain,
Ohio facility, which was contributed by USX to USS/Kobe Steel Company in 1989.
The 1984 EIRBs are special obligations of the State of Ohio exempt from various
forms of federal, state and local income taxation and are therefore subject to
mandatory redemption upon the occurrence of a determination of taxability, and
are further subject to optional and mandatory redemption and tender prior to
maturity pursuant to the terms of the trust indenture agreement concerning the
1984 EIRBs.
The interest rates paid on the 1984 EIRBs averaged 3.45% during calendar year
1999 and was 3.70% at December 31, 1999. The 1984 EIRBs mature on December 1,
2001. As of December 31, 1999, $9,000 of indebtedness was outstanding under the
1984 EIRBs.
66
<PAGE> 67
In connection with the original issuance of the 1984 EIRBs, PNC Bank, N.A.
("PNC") issued an irrevocable, direct-pay letter of credit to secure payment of
the principal of, interest on and the purchase price of the 1984 EIRBs, in an
amount equal to the principal of the 1984 EIRBs plus an amount equal to 75 days
of interest on the 1984 EIRBs at a rate of 15% per year. Draws on the letter of
credit are secured by a first priority lien on bonds purchased as a result of
the draw pursuant to the terms of the reimbursement agreement and a pledge and
security agreement entered into between PNC and USX.
In connection with the consummation of the Combination, Republic Technologies
agreed to pay the debt service on the 1984 EIRBs, including remarketing fees and
amounts due under the PNC letter of credit. Republic Technologies may need to
make payments in respect of the 1984 EIRBs earlier than scheduled if USX
terminates the PNC letter of credit or otherwise makes early payment in respect
of the 1984 EIRBs.
1995 EIRBS
In November 1995, the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority issued $10,160 of
its tax exempt variable rate environmental improvement revenue bonds, or "1995
EIRBs," the proceeds of which were loaned to USX for the purpose, in part, of
refinancing its outstanding $4,745 Ohio Air Quality Development Authority
Floating Rate Environmental Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series B. These Series B
bonds had been issued in 1980 to finance the cost of pollution control equipment
at the Lorain facility. The 1995 EIRBs are special obligations of the State of
Ohio exempt from various forms of federal, state and local income taxation and
are therefore subject to mandatory redemption upon the occurrence of a
determination of taxability, and are further subject to optional and mandatory
redemption and tender prior to maturity pursuant to the terms of the trust
indenture agreement concerning the 1995 EIRBs.
The interest rates paid on the 1995 EIRBs averaged 3.53% during calendar year
1999 and was 4.15% at December 31, 1999. The 1995 EIRBs mature on November 1,
2015. As of December 31, 1999, $4,745 of indebtedness was outstanding under the
1995 EIRBs.
The Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A. ("Wachovia") has issued an
irrevocable, direct-pay letter of credit to secure payment of the principal of,
interest on and the purchase price of the 1995 EIRBs, in a stated amount equal
to the principal amount of the 1995 EIRBs plus an amount equal to 210 days of
interest on the 1995 EIRBs at a rate of 12% per year. Draws on the letter of
credit are secured by a first priority lien on bonds purchased as a result of
the draw pursuant to the terms of the reimbursement agreement and a pledge and
security agreement entered into between Wachovia and USX.
In connection with the consummation of the Combination, Republic Technologies
agreed to pay 46.7% of the debt service on the 1995 EIRBs, including 46.7% of
the remarketing fees and amounts due under the Wachovia letter of credit.
Republic Technologies may need to make payments in respect of the 1995 EIRBs
earlier than scheduled if USX terminates the Wachovia letter of credit or
otherwise makes early payment in respect of the 1995 EIRBs.
Maturities of the Company's long-term debt at December 31, 1999 is as follows:
2000 $ 2,391
2001 11,147
2002 2,513
2003 2,152
2004 1,393
Thereafter 514,460
-------------------
Total $534,056
===================
The Company, subsequent to December 31, 1999, violated certain debt covenants
with respect to timely delivery of its audited 1999 consolidated financial
statements related to the Senior Secured Notes, the Solid Waste Revenue Bonds
Series 1994 and Series 1996, the various Commonwealth of Pennsylvania loans and
the Cartersville IRBs. These violations are no longer continuing upon delivery
of the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 8 - REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES
In connection with the Combination, Republic Technologies entered into a new
senior revolving credit facility ("New Revolver") with BankBoston, N.A.
("BankBoston"), as administrative agent, and other lenders. The New Revolver is
for a total principal amount of up to $425,000. The amount available at any
67
<PAGE> 68
time is limited by a borrowing base. The borrowing base equals 60% of eligible
inventory subject to a maximum; plus 85% of eligible accounts receivable; plus
the lesser of (a) 67% of the appraised liquidation in place value of the CAST-
ROLL facility plus the appraised value of the related property in Canton, Ohio,
provided that no downward adjustment based on any revaluation will be made prior
to March 31, 2001 and, (b) $125,000, minus the product of $4,500 and the number
of quarters elapsed beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2000; minus a
reserve of between $35,000 and $50,000, which will be adjusted based on the
amount of undrawn available amounts under the facility. There were $336,397 of
borrowings under the New Revolver outstanding at December 31, 1999. Amounts
available under the New Revolver at December 31, 1999 were approximately
$63,000.
Borrowings under the New Revolver bear interest, at the Republic Technologies'
option, of either: a base rate used by BankBoston, plus an applicable margin; or
a eurodollar rate on deposits for one, two, three or six month periods, plus the
applicable margin. The applicable margin on base rate loans is 1.25% and on
eurodollar loans is 3.25%. The applicable margin on base rate and eurodollar
loans may be increased by .25% under specified circumstances. The rate at
December 31, 1999 is 9.75%.
Republic Technologies must also pay a commitment fee on the unused commitments
under the New Revolver facility equal to 0.50% per annum, payable monthly in
arrears.
The New Revolver contains covenants that among other things, restrict Republic
Technologies' ability to incur additional indebtedness or guarantee the
obligations of others, change its line of business, merge, consolidate and
acquire or sell assets or stock, pay dividends, or prepay or amend the notes or
any of its subordinated indebtedness.
The Company, subsequent to December 31, 1999, violated a debt covenant under the
New Revolver with respect to timely delivery of its audited 1999 consolidated
financial statements. The bank group expressly reserved its rights and remedies
under the New Revolver but has not accelerated the loan. The event of default
is no longer continuing upon delivery of the consolidated financial
statements to the agent bank.
On September 8, 1998, the acquisition by RES Acquisition of Republic was
partially funded with short-term borrowings of approximately $65,000 (the "RES
Holding Facility") under the Credit Agreement dated September 8, 1998 between
RES Holding and The Chase Manhattan Bank ("Chase"), as administrative agent. The
maturity of the RES Holding Facility was June 8, 1999, however, the agreement
was extended to September 30, 1999. This debt was refinanced with proceeds of
the financing completed concurrent with the Combination.
BarTech had a revolving credit agreement with a group of banks with Chase as
agent which originally provided BarTech with borrowings in an aggregate
principal amount of up to $90,000, of which $5,400 was in the form of letters of
credit. This revolving credit agreement was subsequently amended in September
1997 to provide for the addition of a new revolving sub-facility
("Sub-Facility") and amended certain portions of the original revolving credit
agreement. The Sub-Facility component of the amended agreement provided BarTech
with up to $15.0 million of additional borrowing capacity based on a higher
receivable and inventory advance rate than in the revolving credit agreement.
On May 5, 1999, BarTech further amended its revolving credit agreement ("BarTech
Amended Agreement") in conjunction with the formation of the Marketing JV. The
BarTech Amended Agreement provided for a reduction in BarTech's borrowing
capacity to $77,000, of which $5,300 was in the form of letters of credit. In
addition, amounts available under BarTech's Sub-Facility were reduced to $2,000
with this BarTech Amended Agreement. By July 31, 1999, amounts available under
the BarTech Amended Agreement were further reduced to $71,500 and amounts were
no longer available under BarTech's Sub-Facility. The maturity date of the
BarTech Amended Agreement remained April 2, 2000 and is secured by certain
assets and stock of BarTech.
Borrowings under the BarTech Amended Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum
equal to, at BarTech's option, either a Prime rate plus 2.0% or adjusted LIBOR
plus 3.0%, subject to upward adjustment in certain circumstances. Sub-Facility
borrowings bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at BarTech's option,
either a Prime rate plus 3.5% or LIBOR plus 4.5%. Borrowings outstanding under
the BarTech Amended Agreement including the Sub-Facility were $79,000 at
December 31, 1998. Weighted-average interest rates on borrowings under the
BarTech Amended Agreement and the Sub-Facility were 8.79% and 11.50%,
respectively, at December 31, 1998. The BarTech Amended Agreement was
extinguished with proceeds of the financing completed concurrent with the
Combination.
68
<PAGE> 69
NOTE 9 - DEFINED CONTRIBUTION BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has defined contribution retirement plans that cover substantially
all employees. Company contributions to the plans are based on age and
compensation. The Company funds retirement plan contributions as accrued.
Contributions to these plans by the Company and its predecessor were $2,016,
$2,520, $1,337 and $171 for the period August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999, the
period January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the years ended December 31, 1998
and 1997, respectively.
Republic had profit sharing plans covering all of its employees, excluding
officers. Amounts provided to the profit sharing pool were based on percentages
of the consolidated excess cash flows of the Company, as defined. There was no
expense relating to these plans for any of the periods presented.
In connection with the defined benefit plan improvements during the term of the
new labor agreement, the Company's contributions to the existing defined
contribution plans covering employees at former Republic facilities, the former
Bliss & Laughlin Harvey, Illinois facility and former BarTech facilities will be
discontinued and the defined contribution plans may be merged into the defined
benefit plan (see Note 10).
NOTE 10 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
In connection with the Republic acquisition in September 1998, a new Master
Collective Bargaining Agreement and settlement agreement (collectively, the
"Master CBA") covering all of the former Republic and BarTech facilities with
employees represented by the USWA were entered into with the USWA. The Master
CBA replaced the existing collective bargaining agreements with the USWA, other
than selected plant-specific agreements. In connection with the Combination, the
scope of the Master CBA was extended to cover the former USS/Kobe Lorain, Ohio
facility. The Master CBA expires on October 31, 2003. The Master CBA provides
for improvements in the existing defined benefit pension plans covering
employees at former Republic facilities, former USS/Kobe facilities and the
former Bliss & Laughlin Harvey, Illinois facility, and the creation of a defined
benefit pension plan obligation covering employees at former BarTech facilities.
The existing defined benefit pension plans may be consolidated into one defined
benefit pension plan in the future, which will contain terms found in
traditional steel industry defined benefit pension plans.
The Master CBA allows Republic Technologies to reduce the number of job
classifications at all USWA-covered facilities to five from over thirty-four at
certain facilities thereby permitting employees to be assigned a wider range of
responsibilities.
The Master CBA requires Republic Technologies to offer Early Retirement Buyouts
("ERB's") to at least 1,000 employees and permits Republic Technologies to offer
a Voluntary Severance Plan ("VSP"). The purpose of these programs is to reduce
the hourly workforce by a net reduction of over 1,900 hourly employees over four
years. These programs are substantially voluntary in nature. Accordingly, the
costs associated with these workforce reductions are being recognized as charges
to operations as the offers for ERB's and VSP's are accepted by the employees
and intended to be awarded by Republic Technologies. Through December 31, 1999,
749 voluntary ERB packages were accepted. As such, Republic Technologies has
recorded $95,953 of workforce reduction charges to date for early retirement
benefits, including pension and other postretirement obligations and special
termination payments.
Under the terms of Master CBA, if the ERB's and VSP's do not achieve targeted
headcount reductions, Republic Technologies will have the flexibility to reduce
the hourly workforce by approximately 300 employees in addition to the number of
accepted ERB's and VSP's. Pursuant to the Master CBA, USWA represented employees
will be eligible for Supplemental Unemployment Benefits (SUB) and the
continuation of certain health insurance benefits.
The following is a general description of the Company and its predecessors'
defined benefit plans.
69
<PAGE> 70
REPUBLIC
Republic Technologies (formerly Republic) maintains a defined benefit "floor
offset" plan, which covers all former Republic USWA employees. The plan, when
combined with benefits from the Republic Technologies' (formerly Republic)
defined contribution pension plan and benefits from an LTV Steel Defined Benefit
Pension Plan, will provide a minimum level of pension benefits for USWA
employees. Benefits are based on a combination of employees' age and years of
service. Republic Technologies' policy is to fund this plan based on legal
requirements and tax considerations.
Republic entered into a memorandum of understanding with the PBGC on November 2,
1998, pursuant to which (1) the PBGC agreed to forebear from instituting
proceedings to terminate the USWA Defined Benefit Plan as a result of the
acquisition of Republic or the prospective combination with BarTech, (2) in
January 1999, Republic funded the pension plan with an approximate $27,000
initial contribution and (3) Republic made an additional contribution to such
pension plan in the amount of $20,000 on July 1, 1999. The agreement with the
PBGC contemplated additional quarterly contributions commencing October 1, 1999
in accordance with the following schedule: $7,500 per quarter for the first four
payments, $7,600 per quarter for the next four payments, $9,100 per quarter for
the next four payments and $8,500 per quarter for the final four payments. Of
Republic Technologies' aggregate pension obligation relating to these
contributions, $30,000 was classified as a current liability and $39,068 was
classified as a long-term liability in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1999.
Republic Technologies (formerly Republic) also sponsors postretirement plans for
health care and life insurance that cover most full-time employees. The plans
pay stated percentages of most necessary medical expenses incurred by retirees,
after subtracting payments by Medicare or other providers and after a stated
deductible has been met. Hourly employees become eligible for benefits after
completing 15 years of service and reaching age 60. Salary employees become
eligible for benefits if they retire after reaching age 65.
BARTECH
Bliss & Laughlin ("BLI") maintains defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all hourly employees of its Harvey, Illinois plant. Employees at
the Batavia, Illinois and Cartersville, Georgia plants are not covered. Benefits
are based on years of service and employee's age at termination. CDSC maintains
pension plans covering substantially all employees. Benefits for the CDSC
salaried employees' plan are based on an average salary for the five most recent
years prior to retirement. Benefits for the CDSC bargaining unit employees' plan
are based on years of service. Republic Technologies policy is to fund pension
cost in accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 in the United States and local regulations in Canada.
BLI and CDSC also sponsor postretirement plans for health care and life
insurance that cover most full-time employees. The plans pay stated percentages
of most necessary medical expenses incurred by retirees, after subtracting
payments by Medicare or other providers and after a stated deductible has been
met. Participants become eligible for benefits if they retire from BLI after
reaching age 55 with 10 or more years of service.
USS/KOBE
Republic Technologies (formerly USS/Kobe) sponsors two noncontributory defined
benefit plans covering substantially all former USS/Kobe employees. Benefits
under these plans are based upon years of service and final average pensionable
earnings, or a minimum benefit based upon years of service, whichever is
greater. The funding policy for these defined benefit plans provides that
payment to the pension trusts shall be equal to the minimum funding requirements
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 plus such additional
amounts as may be approved from time to time. Assets held by the plans are
invested primarily in corporate equity and debt securities and interest bearing
cash accounts. In addition, pension benefits from USS/Kobe's two defined
contribution plans, which cover participating employees, are based upon years of
service and career earnings.
In connection with the Combination, Republic Technologies agreed with the PBGC
to maintain a specified level of funding for the USS/Kobe Union Eligible Pension
Plan, a defined benefit plan for union
70
<PAGE> 71
employees, based on statutory funding requirements. The agreement with the PBGC
with respect to this plan contemplates that contributions will be made as
follows: for the year 2000, an amount necessary to avoid an accumulated funding
deficiency plus $4,000 ($6,000); for 2001, an amount so that the December 31,
2001 credit balance equals that of December 31, 2000 with interest plus $2,000;
for 2002, an amount so that the December 31, 2002 credit balance equals that of
December 2001 with interest plus $2,000; for 2003, an amount so that the
December 31, 2003 credit balance equals that of December 31, 2002 with interest
plus $2,000. The agreement with the PBGC further contemplates that, beginning
with 2004, Republic Technologies will make contributions to maintain the
December 31, 2003 credit balance with interest. As security for such obligation,
Republic Technologies has provided the PBGC with a $5,000 letter of credit.
Republic Technologies currently estimates that approximately $53,600 of fundings
will be required in connection with these obligations.
The components of the net periodic pension costs are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period From Period From
August 13, January 1,
1999 to 1999 to Year ended Year ended
December 31, August 12, December 31, December 31,
1999 1999 1998 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost $ 3,744 $ 3,719 $ 2,376 $ 393
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligations 7,746 4,662 2,733 1,254
Expected return on plan assets (6,811) (3,024) (2,006) (1,633)
Amortization of prior service cost (7) 30 40 35
Recognized net actuarial loss (26) 169 21 22
Curtailment loss 2,962 -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic pension cost $ 7,608 $ 5,556 $ 3,164 $ 71
============================================================
</TABLE>
71
<PAGE> 72
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost included the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period From Period From
August 13, 1999 January 1, Year ended Year ended
to December 31, 1999 to August December 31, December 31,
1999 12, 1999 1998 1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost of benefit earned $ 748 $ 1,047 $ 774 $ 161
Interest on accumulated postretirement benefit
obligations 4,289 6,004 2,449 415
Recognized net actuarial loss (53) (74) 42 10
------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic postretirement cost $ 4,984 $ 6,977 $ 3,265 $ 586
============================================================
</TABLE>
72
<PAGE> 73
The change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, funded status and
amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets related Republic
Technologies' pension plans and other postretirement benefits are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pension Plans Other Postretirement Benefits
------------------------------ ------------------------------
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
1999 1998 1999 1998
------------------------------ ------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 101,295 $ 19,142 $ 101,302 $ 6,579
Service cost 7,463 2,376 1,794 774
Interest cost 12,408 2,734 10,294 2,449
Acquisitions 147,963 63,750 104,638 87,753
Foreign currency exchange rate change 533 (654) 201 (456)
Actuarial (gain) loss (18,671) 4,980 173 (46)
Curtailment loss 51,800 11,186 20,817 5,382
Special termination benefits 3,357 -- -- --
Change in discount rate -- 418 -- 75
Benefits paid (18,661) (2,637) (8,622) (1,208)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Benefit obligation at end of year $ 287,487 $ 101,295 $ 230,597 $ 101,302
========= ========= ========= =========
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:
Fair value of plant assets at beginning of
year $ 32,802 $ 20,946 -- --
Actual return on plan assets 19,822 3,464 -- --
Employer contribution 55,221 508 $ 8,622 $ 1,208
Acquisitions 121,340 11,233 9,299 --
Foreign currency exchange rate change 609 (712) -- --
Benefits paid (18,661) (2,637) (8,622) (1,208)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 211,133 $ 32,802 $ 9,299 --
========= ========= ========= =========
Funded status-underfunded $ (76,354) $ (68,493) $(221,298) $(101,302)
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss (19,565) 4,297 1,665 1,333
Unrecognized prior service cost 1,316 502 -- --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net amount recognized $ (94,603) $ (63,694) $(219,633) $ (99,969)
========= ========= ========= =========
Amounts recognized in the statement of
financial position consist of:
Net amount recognized $ (94,603) $ (63,694) $(219,633) $ (99,969)
Adjustment required to recognize minimum
liability -- (2,491) -- --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Accrued benefit costs $ (94,603) $ (66,185) $(219,633) $ (99,969)
========= ========= ========= =========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:
Discount rate 7.47% 6.83% 7.50% 6.81%
Expected return on plan assets 8.98% 8.50%
Rate of compensation increase 3.95% 4.59%
</TABLE>
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value
of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in
excess of plan assets were $262,189, $263,725 and $186,452, respectively as of
December 31, 1999, and $83,423, $84,712 and $12,208, respectively, as of
December 31, 1998.
73
<PAGE> 74
For measurement purposes, a weighted average annual rate of increase in the per
capita cost of covered health care claims of 7.02% was assumed for fiscal 2000;
the rate assumed to decrease by approximately 0.5% per year to 4.52% for fiscal
2005, and remain at that level thereafter.
To illustrate the health care cost trend on amounts reported, changing the
assumed health care cost trend rates by one percentage point in each year would
have the following effects as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
One Percentage Point
----------------------------
Increase Decrease
------------ --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Effect on total service and interest cost components $ 1,358 $ (1,131)
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation 16,591 (14,003)
</TABLE>
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES
The Company is a limited liability company that will be treated as a partnership
for income tax purposes and accordingly is not an income taxpaying entity.
However, pursuant to the limited liability company agreement, RTI's parent will
be required to make cash distributions to its members to the extent necessary to
satisfy tax obligations regarding members' investment in RTI. To the extent
RTI's parent is required to make these tax distributions, the Company will be
required to make equivalent cash distributions to its parent. However, the
Company believes that certain of RTI's parent's members have net operating loss
carryforwards which may be available to offset a significant portion of their
taxable income attributable to their investment in the Company and reduce but
not eliminate, the need for tax distributions. Use of these net operating losses
is subject to various limitations and uncertainties and accordingly, the Company
cannot give any assurances that these net operating loss carryforwards will
reduce the need for tax distributions or that they will not be otherwise
utilized.
The provision for income taxes included in the accompanying
consolidated/combined statements of operations for all periods presented
represents a provision for foreign income taxes. Prior to the Combination, a
benefit for domestic income taxes is not included in the accompanying combined
statements of operations since the Company's deferred tax benefits for net
operating loss carryforwards were entirely offset by provisions for deferred tax
valuation allowances. At December 31, 1998, the Company had a deferred tax
valuation allowance recorded that exceeded its net deferred tax assets by
$5,001.
NOTE 12 - SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
The Company operates in three reportable segments: hot-rolled, cold-finished and
specialty steels. As discussed previously in Note 1, the Company intends to sell
its specialty steel division and accordingly, the accompanying
consolidated/combined financial statements reflect that division as a
discontinued operation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 30. As such the following tables do not reflect specialty steels as a
reportable segment. The Company manages the reportable segments as separate
strategic business units. Differences between the segments include manufacturing
techniques and equipment, competition, and end-users. The Company measures
segment performance based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, other postretirement benefits, workforce reduction charges and
other (income) loss, net ("EBITDA, as defined").
HOT-ROLLED
Hot-rolled bars and rods are processed from blooms and billets on rolling mills
to change the internal physical properties, size or shape of the steel.
Desirable characteristics of hot-rolled products include internal soundness,
uniformity of chemical composition and freedom from surface imperfection. The
Company's hot-rolled products include rounds, squares and hexagons, in both cut-
lengths and coils. Customers for hot-rolled products include manufacturers of
automotive parts, industrial equipment, independent forgers, steel service
centers and converters. The Company's hot-rolled products are used in the
manufacture of end-use products such as automotive drive trains, engine and
transmission parts, bearings and tractor components.
74
<PAGE> 75
COLD-FINISHED
Cold-finishing is a value-added process which improves the physical properties
of hot-rolled bars and rods. Cold-finished products are produced from hot-rolled
bars by cold-drawing, turning, grinding, thermal treating or a combination of
these processes. The manufacturing process allows for production of products
with more precise size and straightness tolerances, as well as improved strength
and surface finish, that provides customers with a more efficient means of
producing a number of end products by often eliminating processing steps in the
customers' use of the products. The Company's cold-finished products include
rounds, squares, hexagons, and flats, all of which can be further processed by
turning, grinding or polishing, or a combination thereof. Customers for cold-
finished products include manufacturers of automotive parts, industrial
equipment, steel service centers and distributors. The Company's cold-finished
products are used in the manufacture of end-use products such as automotive
steering assemblies, electrical motor shafts, ball and roller bearings, valves
and hand tools.
Prior to August 13, 1999, intersegment sales were made at current market prices
and were eliminated in consolidation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Period From August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter Segment
Cold- Total Elimination/ Consolidated/
Hot-Rolled Finished Segments Other Combined
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 459,201 $ 119,653 $ 578,854 $ (58,920) $ 519,934
Depreciation and amortization 18,331 2,161 20,492 -- 20,492
Segment profit (EBITDA,
as defined) (74,589) (259) (74,848) -- (74,848)
Segment assets 1,324,614 149,963 1,474,575 (59,157) 1,415,418
Capital expenditures 11,891 1,121 13,012 -- 13,012
For the Period From January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter Segment
Cold- Total Elimination/ Consolidated/
Hot-Rolled Finished Segments Other Combined
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 346,550 $ 199,295 $ 545,845 $ (32,974) $ 512,871
Depreciation and amortization 17,051 4,838 21,889 -- 21,889
Segment profit (EBITDA,
as defined) 953 (3,449) (2,496) -- (2,496)
Capital expenditures 18,784 1,574 20,350 -- 20,358
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter Segment
Cold- Total Elimination/ Consolidated/
Hot-Rolled Finished Segments Other Combined
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 301,605 $ 220,894 $ 522,499 $ (49,929) $ 472,570
Depreciation and amortization 13,029 3,078 16,107 -- 16,107
Segment profit (EBITDA,
as defined) (15,187) 6,346 (8,841) -- (8,841)
Segment assets 515,735 167,594 683,329 204,736 888,065
Capital expenditures 12,772 2,778 15,550 -- 15,550
</TABLE>
75
<PAGE> 76
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter Segment
Cold- Total Elimination/ Consolidated/
Hot-Rolled Finished Segments Other Combined
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 140,494 $ 159,120 $ 299,614 $ (56,718) $ 242,896
Depreciation and amortization 2,518 2,005 4,523 -- 4,523
Segment profit (EBITDA,
as defined) (22,102) 5,313 (16,789) -- (16,789)
Segment assets 138,509 94,816 233,325 (27,647) 205,678
Capital expenditures 4,590 1,223 5,813 -- 5,813
</TABLE>
NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
From April 1996 to August 13, 1999, Blackstone and Veritas received annual
monitoring fees from BarTech equal to $875 per year pursuant to a monitoring
agreement. Under the terms of the monitoring agreement, Blackstone and Veritas
provide management and financial monitoring services to BarTech. Blackstone and
Veritas have split the monitoring fees paid evenly between them. Blackstone and
Veritas have also been reimbursed by BarTech for their out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in providing such services.
In connection with the acquisition of Republic in 1998, RES Holding paid
transaction fees of $3,400 to Blackstone and $800 to Veritas and reimbursed them
for all related out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, pursuant to a monitoring
agreement entered into with RES Holding, Blackstone and Veritas were entitled to
receive an annual monitoring fee for providing management and financial
monitoring services equal to $1,125, with Blackstone receiving 75% and Veritas
receiving 25% of this monitoring fee. Blackstone and Veritas have also been
reimbursed by RES Holding and Republic for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in providing these services. Approximately $2,400 of accrued but unpaid BarTech
and RES Holding monitoring fees were paid following the Combination.
In connection with the Combination, the Company paid transaction fees in the
aggregate of $4,000 to Blackstone, Veritas, USX and affiliates of Kobe. In
addition, the Company reimbursed or is expected to reimburse Blackstone,
Veritas, USX and Kobe for their out-of-pocket expenses related to the
Combination. Upon consummation of the Combination, the Company entered into a
new monitoring agreement with Blackstone, Veritas, USX and Kobe that replaced
the existing monitoring agreements regarding BarTech and Republic, with the
parties to receive an aggregate annual fee of $4,000.
In addition, in the future, Blackstone, Veritas, USX and Kobe or their
affiliates may receive customary fees for other advisory and transactional
services rendered to the Company. If such services are rendered in the future,
the fees will be negotiated from time to time on an arms-length basis and will
be based on the services performed and the fees charged to third parties for
comparable services.
During the period from August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999, the period from
January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 1998, the
Company had approximately $43,600, $54,200 and $89,000, respectively, of net
sales to American Axle & Manufacturing, a company controlled by Blackstone. All
such sales were in the ordinary course of business and on arm's-length terms.
The Company and Haynes Specialty Steels Company, a subsidiary of Haynes, a
company controlled by Blackstone, are parties to a facilities management
agreement dated as of April 15, 1999, by which Haynes agreed to manage the
Company's Baltimore, Maryland and Canton, Ohio (Harrison Avenue) specialty steel
finishing facilities. The Company continues to own these facilities and must
approve all material expenditures and financial decisions of Haynes with respect
to these facilities. As compensation for the services provided, Haynes receives
management fees equal to the total compensation costs, including benefits, of
the Haynes personnel providing management services to the Company that is
allocable to the
76
<PAGE> 77
time these personnel devote to these facilities. In addition, Haynes is
reimbursed by the Company for all of its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with the provision of management services.
In connection with the Combination, the Company entered into the following
agreements with USX, Kobe and FirstEnergy Service Corp. ("FirstEnergy") (another
equity investor in the Company's indirect parent) or their affiliates:
ROUND SUPPLY AGREEMENT
- ----------------------
The Company entered into a five-year supply agreement with USX and the new
tubular steel joint venture between USX and Kobe, which provides for the tubular
joint venture purchasing all of its requirements for steel rounds at its Lorain,
Ohio pipemill from the Company up to a maximum of 400,000 tons per year for a
price equal to the Company's production costs plus an agreed upon margin per
ton. The tubular joint venture also has the right to purchase up to an
additional 200,000 tons per year for a price equal to the Company's fixed
production costs plus an agreed upon margin per ton. If the tubular joint
venture is unable to purchase at least 400,000 tons of steel rounds per year for
its Lorain, Ohio pipemill, USX is required to purchase any shortfall, under
specified circumstances, to satisfy the steel round requirements of its
Fairfield, Alabama pipemill facility that can not be satisfied from USX's
internal production of steel rounds. The Company sold approximately $51,100
worth of seamless rounds to USX in the period from August 13, 1999 to December
31, 1999.
COKE SUPPLY AGREEMENT
- ---------------------
The Company entered into a five-year supply agreement with USX, which provides
that RTI purchase substantially all of its requirements for coke for use in its
Lorain, Ohio blast furnace from USX. The purchase price for coke is based on
market prices and adjusted annually, subject to most favored nations provisions
for price and other conditions, which allow the Company to receive the most
favorable terms that USX grants to any of its coke customers. The Company
purchased approximately $22,000 worth of coke from USX in the period from August
13, 1999 to December 31, 1999.
PELLET SUPPLY AGREEMENT
- -----------------------
Under this agreement, the Company agreed to purchase all of its iron ore pellet
requirements for its Lorain, Ohio blast furnace from USX for a period of five
years. The purchase price for pellets is generally based on market prices and
will be adjusted annually, subject to most favored nation provisions for price
and other conditions, which allow the Company to receive the most favorable
terms that USX grants to any of its pellet customers. The Company purchased
approximately $47,100 worth of iron ore pellets from USX in the period from
August 13, 1999 to December 31, 1999.
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AGREEMENTS
- ------------------------------
The Company entered into technology transfer and related agreements with Kobe
and one of its affiliates which provides the Company with a license to use
various Kobe technology and requires Kobe to provide the Company with various
technical assistance in return for annual payments to Kobe of approximately
$1,000.
SAFE HARBOR LEASE MATTERS AGREEMENT
- -----------------------------------
Pursuant to the master restructuring agreement, the Company received certain
property formerly owned by USS/Kobe that qualifies as "Safe Harbor Lease
Property," thus affording USX and Kobe with tax benefits. The Safe Harbor Lease
Matters Agreement contains covenants and warranties to ensure that the property
remains qualified as Safe Harbor Lease Property and to ensure the continuation
of the tax benefits.
ENERGY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
- ---------------------------
In connection with the consummation of the Combination, the Company entered into
an agreement with FirstEnergy under which it appointed FirstEnergy as its
exclusive representative for the procurement of energy supply and services. As a
result of this arrangement, it is likely that much of the Company's energy
purchasing requirements will eventually be filled by FirstEnergy. Also in
connection with the consummation of the Combination, FirstEnergy purchased
$30,000 of the Series C convertible preferred stock of RTI, Inc. (the Company's
direct parent).
77
<PAGE> 78
In connection with the Combination, the Company also entered into an agreement
with the new tubular steel joint venture between USX and Kobe regarding the
provision of various utilities and an agreement with USX regarding the provision
of various transitional services. In addition, at the closing of the
Combination, the Company entered into an agreement with USX regarding payment of
certain payables owed by USS/KOBE to USX. See Note 7 for further information
regarding this item.
NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is the subject of or party to
various pending or threatened legal and environmental actions. The Company
provides for the costs related to these matters when a loss is probable and the
amount is reasonably estimable. Based on information presently known to the
Company, management believes that any ultimate liability resulting from these
actions will not have a material adverse affect on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company uses certain lease arrangements to supplement its financing
activities. Rental expense under operating leases was approximately $2,693,
$1,262, $2,400 and $800 for the period from August 13, 1999 to December 31,
1999, the period from January 1, 1999 to August 12, 1999 and the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. At December 31, 1999, total minimum
lease payments under noncancellable operating leases are $5,531 in 2000, $4,012
in 2001, $2,529 in 2002, $1,291 in 2003, $842 in 2004 and $2,741 thereafter. The
Company sublets BarTech's former Seven Hills, Ohio headquarters building which
provided income of approximately $88 in 1999 and will offset future minimum
lease obligations by approximately $200 in 2000-2004 and $100 thereafter.
On December 3, 1998, Republic entered into a technical exchange agreement with
Sanyo Special Steel Company of Japan ("Sanyo") for a total of $6,000. The
forty-eight month agreement involves technical assistance in melting, refining,
and casting technologies. Republic also entered into an agreement to share in
the cost and benefits of a similar agreement between BarTech and Sanyo dated
January 25, 1999. The BarTech and Sanyo agreement is also for a period of
forty-eight months with total payments of $6,000. Obligations under both
agreements as of December 31, 1999 are as follows: 2000--$2,400; 2001--$2,400;
2002--$1,200; and 2003--$600.
RTI, Inc., the Company's ultimate parent, has $5,500 Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding that is manditorily redeemable on September 26, 2000, payment for
which is expected to be made by RTI, Inc. from distributions or loans from the
Company.
NOTE 15 - ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
The Company is subject to a broad range of federal, state, and local
environmental laws and regulations, including those governing discharges into
the air and water, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, and
the remediation of contamination associated with the disposal of waste. The
Company continuously monitors its compliance with such environmental laws and
regulations and, accordingly, believes that it is currently in substantial
compliance with such laws and regulations. The Company expects to expend
approximately $5,600 during the next 24 months for environmental control
measures. As is the case with most steel producers, the Company could incur
significant costs related to environmental compliance, in particular those
arising from remediation costs for historical waste disposal practices at
certain of the Company's facilities. The Company believes that these costs are
most likely to be in the range of $15,869 to $25,546 over the lives of the
Company's facilities. This range represents the estimated aggregate cost to
resolve the environmental contingencies. The Company does not anticipate any
third-party recoveries. The reserve to cover potential current and noncurrent
environmental liabilities was approximately $21,408 and $14,300 as of December
31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, substantially all of which is classified as a
long-term obligation in the accompanying consolidated/combined balance sheets.
The reserve has been established and is monitored based on continuing reviews of
the reserve, each matter comprising the reserve, and whether any new matters
should be included in the reserve, using currently available information
relative to enacted laws and regulations and existing technology. These reviews
are performed periodically by an in-house committee comprised of representatives
experienced in environmental matters from the environmental, operating, and
accounting departments in consultation with outside legal and technical experts,
as necessary.
78
<PAGE> 79
NOTE 16 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In connection with its acquisition of Republic, the Company determined its
intent to sell its specialty steel division and accordingly, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements reflect that division as a discontinued
operations in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30. An
estimate of the operating results of the specialty steels division during the
phase-out period from the acquisition date to the estimated ultimate
disposition date was made and included as a fair value adjustment as part of
the allocation of the Republic purchase price. During the period from August
13, 1999 to December 31, 1999, a provision of $6,378 was made for the estimated
additional loss related to the ultimate disposition of the specialty steels
division.
In April 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with Haynes, a leading
manufacturer of nickel and cobalt based alloys, to manage the Company's
Specialty Steels division. According to the terms of the agreement, the Company
pays Haynes a management fee based upon the allocable portion of total costs
incurred by Haynes attributable to management activities of the combined
operations. The Company and Haynes are affiliates as both companies are
controlled directly or indirectly by entities associated with The Blackstone
Group. The Company is currently in the process of selling its specialty
division. Management anticipates the sale to be completed during the second
quarter of 2000.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period From Period From Period From
August 13, 1999 to January 1, 1999 to September 8, 1998 to
December 31, 1999 August 12, 1999 December 31, 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 16,822 $29,717 $21,169
Gross loss (3,779) (1,249) (530)
Loss before income taxes (5,441) (3,480) (2,281)
Provision for income taxes -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (5,441) $(3,480) $(2,281)
=====================================================================
The components of net assets of discontinued operations included in the
Company's balance sheets as assets held for sale were as follows:
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
----------------------- -----------------------
Assets held for sale, current- Inventories $ 15,219 $22,408
======================= =======================
Assets held for sale, non-current - Property, plant
and equipment $ 9,009 $11,687
======================= =======================
</TABLE>
NOTE 17 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND SIGNIFICANT
GROUP CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that
value:
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short
maturity of those investments.
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of this preferred
stock, which is not publicly traded.
79
<PAGE> 80
LONG-TERM DEBT
The fair value of the company's long-term debt obligations are
estimated based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar
issues or on the current rates offered to the company for debt of the
same remaining maturities. The fair value of the company's senior
secured notes is determined using quoted market prices. The fair value
of the company's economic development financing approximates carrying
values as the development authorities continue to provide such
financing on substantially the same terms as provided to the Company.
The estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments are as follows:
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
--------------------------- --------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
------------ ------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,637 $ 4,637 $ 5,948 $ 5,948
Long-term debt 483,453 370,527 429,488 451,617
Redeemable preferred stock -- -- 5,500 --
</TABLE>
80
<PAGE> 81
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
-------------------------------------------
Charged to Deductions
Balance at Charged to Other from Balance
Beginning Costs and Accounts - Reserves (a) at End of
Description of Year Expenses Recoveries Describe Year
- ------------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ --------------- ------------- -----------
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999 $ 2,679 6,534 40 403(c)(e) (858) 8,798
1998 817 448 (11) 1,630(b)(c)(d) (205) 2,679
1997 567 1,160 (885) (3)(c) (22) 817
RESERVES FOR
INVENTORIES:
1999 $ 2,364 11,221 $13,585
1998 0 2,364 2,364
1997 -- -- --
VALUATION ALLOWANCE
FOR DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:
1999 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1998 $ 42,736 16,934 $59,670
1997 24,791 17,945 42,736
</TABLE>
(a) Represents uncollected accounts charged-off against the allowance.
(b) Includes allowance recognized in connection with the acquisition of
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.
(c) Foreign currency translation
(d) Addition to allowance due to reclassification of $60
(e) Includes allowance recognized in connection with the acquisition of
USS/Kobe Steel Company's SBQ bar division.
81
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 4,637
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 184,501
<ALLOWANCES> 27,335
<INVENTORY> 284,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 469,597
<PP&E> 820,568
<DEPRECIATION> 56,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,415,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 57,599
<BONDS> 481,062
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,415,418
<SALES> 1,032,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,032,805
<CGS> 1,028,676
<TOTAL-COSTS> 1,028,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 212,050
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 89,162
<INCOME-PRETAX> (297,083)
<INCOME-TAX> 854
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (297,937)
<DISCONTINUED> 6,378
<EXTRAORDINARY> 23,874
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (328,189)
<EPS-BASIC> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
