SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
Transitional Report Pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the period from Inception, March 4, 1999 to December 31, 1999
Commission file number 000-28519
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Former Name)
PATHOBIOTEK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
(New Name)
Texas 76-0510754
------------------------- --------------------
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
7010 NW 100 DRIVE, BLDG. A, STE. #101, HOUSTON, TX 77092
--------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 785-4722
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class: None
Name of each exchange on which registered: N/A
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class: Common No Par Value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing
requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes No X
----- ------
Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B
is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best
of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to
this Form 10-KSB. X
-----
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $0
1
<PAGE>
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:
___X___ Yes _______ No
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of December 31, 1999: $0
Number of outstanding shares of the registrant's no par value common stock, as
of December 31, 1999: 672,000
2
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Description of Business.
------------------------
General
--------
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on
March 4, 1999 and is in the early developmental and promotional stages. To date
the Company's activities have been organizational ones, directed at developing
its business plan and raising its initial capital. The company has no commercial
operations as of date hereof. The company has no full-time employees and owns no
real estate.
At year end, the Company is a "shell" company and its only current business
plan is to seek, investigate, and, if warranted, acquire one or more properties
or businesses, and to pursue other related activities intended to enhance
shareholder value. The acquisition of a business opportunity may be made by
purchase, merger, exchange of stock, or otherwise, and may encompass assets or a
business entity, such as a corporation, joint venture, or partnership. The
Company has no capital, and it is unlikely that the Company will be able to take
advantage of more than one such business opportunity. The Company intends to
seek opportunities demonstrating the potential of long-term growth as opposed to
short-term earnings.
At the present time the Company has not identified any business opportunity
that it plans to pursue, nor has the Company reached any agreement or definitive
understanding with any person concerning an acquisition. The Company filed a
Form 10-SB on a voluntary basis in 1999 in order to become a 12(g) registered
company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a "reporting company," the
Company may be more attractive to a private acquisition target because it may be
listed to trade its shares on the OTCBB.
It is anticipated that the Company's officers and directors will contact
broker-dealers and other persons with whom they are acquainted who are involved
3
<PAGE>
in corporate finance matters to advise them of the Company's existence and to
determine if any companies or businesses they represent have an interest in
considering a merger or acquisition with the Company. No assurance can be given
that the Company will be successful in finding or acquiring a desirable business
opportunity, given that no funds that are available for acquisitions, or that
any acquisition that occurs will be on terms that are favorable to the Company
or its stockholders.
The Company's search will be directed toward small and medium-sized
enterprises which have a desire to become public corporations and which are able
to satisfy, or anticipate in the reasonably near future being able to satisfy,
the minimum asset requirements in order to qualify shares for trading on NASDAQ
or a stock exchange (See "Investigation and Selection of Business
Opportunities"). The Company anticipates that the business opportunities
presented to it will (i) be recently organized with no operating history, or a
history of losses attributable to under-capitalization or other factors; (ii) be
experiencing financial or operating difficulties; (iii) be in need of funds to
develop a new product or service or to expand into a new market; (iv) be relying
upon an untested product or marketing concept; or (v) have a combination of the
characteristics mentioned in (i) through (iv). The Company intends to
concentrate its acquisition efforts on properties or businesses that it believes
to be undervalued. Given the above factors, investors should expect that any
acquisition candidate may have a history of losses or low profitability.
The Company does not propose to restrict its search for investment
opportunities to any particular geographical area or industry, and may,
therefore, engage in essentially any business, to the extent of its limited
resources. This includes industries such as service, finance, natural resources,
manufacturing, high technology, product development, medical, communications and
others. The Company's discretion in the selection of business opportunities is
unrestricted, subject to the availability of such opportunities, economic
conditions, and other factors.
As a consequence of this registration of its securities, any entity which
has an interest in being acquired by, or merging into the Company, is expected
to be an entity that desires to become a public company and establish a public
trading market for its securities. In connection with such a merger or
acquisition, it is highly likely that an amount of stock constituting control of
the Company would be issued by the Company or purchased from the current
principal shareholders of the Company by the acquiring entity or its affiliates.
If stock is purchased from the current shareholders, the transaction is very
likely to result in substantial gains to them relative to their purchase price
for such stock. In the Company's judgment, none of its officers and directors
would thereby become an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Section 2(11) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The sale of a controlling interest by
certain principal shareholders of the Company could occur at a time when the
other shareholders of the Company remain subject to restrictions on the transfer
of their shares.
4
<PAGE>
Depending upon the nature of the transaction, the current officers and
directors of the Company may resign management positions with the Company in
connection with the Company's acquisition of a business opportunity. See "Form
of Acquisition," below, and "Risk Factors - The Company - Lack of Continuity in
Management." In the event of such a resignation, the Company's current
management would not have any control over the conduct of the Company's business
following the Company's combination with a business opportunity.
It is anticipated that business opportunities will come to the Company's
attention from various sources, including its officer and director, its other
stockholders, professional advisors such as attorneys and accountants,
securities broker-dealers, venture capitalists, members of the financial
community, and others who may present unsolicited proposals. The Company has no
plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any individual for such
person to act as a finder of opportunities for the Company.
The Company does not foresee that it would enter into a merger or
acquisition transaction with any business with which its officers or directors
are currently affiliated. Should the Company determine in the future, contrary
to foregoing expectations, that a transaction with an affiliate would be in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders, the Company is in general
permitted by Florida law to enter into such a transaction if:
1. The material facts as to the relationship or interest of the affiliate and as
to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the Board of
Directors, and the Board in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by
the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested directors, even though
the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum; or
5
<PAGE>
2. The material facts as to the relationship or interest of the affiliate and as
to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the stockholders
entitled to vote thereon, and the contract or transaction is specifically
approved in good faith by vote of the stockholders; or
3. The contract or transaction is fair as to the Company as of the time it is
authorized, approved or ratified, by the Board of Directors or the stockholders.
Investigation and Selection of Business Opportunities
------------------------------------------------------
To a large extent, a decision to participate in a specific business opportunity
may be made upon management's analysis of the quality of the other company's
management and personnel, the anticipated acceptability of new products or
marketing concepts, the merit of technological changes, the perceived benefit
the company will derive from becoming a publicly held entity, and numerous other
factors which are difficult, if not impossible, to analyze through the
application of any objective criteria. In many instances, it is anticipated that
the historical operations of a specific business opportunity may not necessarily
be indicative of the potential for the future because of the possible need to
shift marketing approaches substantially, expand significantly, change product
emphasis, change or substantially augment management, or make other changes. The
Company will be dependent upon the owners of a business opportunity to identify
any such problems which may exist and to implement, or be primarily responsible
for the implementation of, required changes. Because the Company may participate
in a business opportunity with a newly organized firm or with a firm which is
entering a new phase of growth, it should be emphasized that the Company will
incur further risks, because management in many instances will not have proved
its abilities or effectiveness, the eventual market for such company's products
or services will likely not be established, and such company may not be
profitable when acquired.
It is anticipated that the Company will not be able to diversify, but will
essentially be limited to one such venture because of the Company's limited
financing. This lack of diversification will not permit the Company to offset
potential losses from one business opportunity against profits from another, and
should be considered an adverse factor affecting any decision to purchase the
Company's securities.
6
<PAGE>
It is emphasized that management of the Company may effect transactions having a
potentially adverse impact upon the Company's shareholders pursuant to the
authority and discretion of the Company's management to complete acquisitions
without submitting any proposal to the stockholders for their consideration.
Holders of the Company's securities should not anticipate that the Company
necessarily will furnish such holders, prior to any merger or acquisition, with
financial statements, or any other documentation, concerning a target company or
its business. In some instances, however, the proposed participation in a
business opportunity may be submitted to the stockholders for their
consideration, either voluntarily by such directors to seek the stockholders'
advice and consent or because state law so requires.
The analysis of business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the
supervision of the Company's President, who is not a professional business
analyst. See "Management." Although there are no current plans to do so, Company
management might hire an outside consultant to assist in the investigation and
selection of business opportunities, and might pay a finder's fee. Since Company
management has no current plans to use any outside consultants or advisors to
assist in the investigation and selection of business opportunities, no policies
have been adopted regarding use of such consultants or advisors, the criteria to
be used in selecting such consultants or advisors, the services to be provided,
the term of service, or regarding the total amount of fees that may be paid.
However, because of the limited resources of the Company, it is likely that any
such fee the Company agrees to pay would be paid in stock and not in cash.
Otherwise, the Company anticipates that it will consider, among other things,
the following factors:
1. Potential for growth and profitability, indicated by new technology,
anticipated market expansion, or new products;
2. The Company's perception of how any particular business opportunity will be
received by the investment community and by the Company's stockholders;
3. Whether, following the business combination, the financial condition of
the business opportunity would be, or would have a significant prospect in the
foreseeable future of becoming sufficient to enable the securities of the
Company to qualify for listing on an exchange or on a national automated
securities quotation system, such as NASDAQ, so as to permit the trading of such
securities to be exempt from the requirements of Rule 15c2-6 recently adopted by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. See "Risk Factors - The Company -
Regulation of Penny Stocks."
7
<PAGE>
4. Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be
provided by the Company or from operations, through the sale of additional
securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements, or from other
sources;
5. The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;
6. Competitive position as compared to other companies of similar size and
experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a
whole;
7. Strength and diversity of existing management, or management prospects that
are scheduled for recruitment;
8. The cost of participation by the Company as compared to the perceived
tangible and intangible values and potential; and
9. The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials,
services, professional assistance, and other required items.
In regard to the possibility that the shares of the Company would qualify
for listing on NASDAQ, the current standards include the requirements that the
issuer of the securities that are sought to be listed have total assets of at
least $4,000,000 and total capital and surplus of at least $2,000,000. Many, and
perhaps most, of the business opportunities that might be potential candidates
for a combination with the Company would not satisfy the NASDAQ listing
criteria.
No one of the factors described above will be controlling in the selection
of a business opportunity, and management will attempt to analyze all factors
appropriate to each opportunity and make a determination based upon reasonable
investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business
opportunities may occur in many different industries and at various stages of
development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and
analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.
Potential investors must recognize that, because of the Company's limited
capital available for investigation and management's limited experience in
business analysis, the Company may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse
facts about the opportunity to be acquired.
8
<PAGE>
The Company is unable to predict when it may participate in a business
opportunity. It expects, however, that the analysis of specific proposals and
the selection of a business opportunity may take several months or more.
In March of 2000, the Company completed a merger as described in a Form 8-K
dated March 7, 2000 with Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc., a Texas Corporation.
This report is being filed to conform the merged companies financial reporting
period to a calendar year end.
Prior to making a decision to participate in a business opportunity, the
Company will generally request that it be provided with written materials
regarding the business opportunity containing such items as a description of
products, services and company history; management resumes; financial
information; available projections, with related assumptions upon which they are
based; an explanation of proprietary products and services; evidence of existing
patents, trademarks, or services marks, or rights thereto; present and proposed
forms of compensation to management; a description of transactions between such
company and its affiliates during relevant periods; a description of present and
required facilities; an analysis of risks and competitive conditions; a
financial plan of operation and estimated capital requirements; audited
financial statements, or if they are not available, unaudited financial
statements, together with reasonable assurances that audited financial
statements would be able to be produced within a reasonable period of time not
to exceed 60 days following completion of a merger transaction; and other
information deemed relevant.
As part of the Company's investigation, the Company's executive officers
and directors may meet personally with management and key personnel, may visit
and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of
certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel,
and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of the Company's
limited financial resources and management expertise.
It is possible that the range of business opportunities that might be
available for consideration by the Company could be limited by the impact of
Securities and Exchange Commission regulations regarding purchase and sale of
"penny stocks." The regulations would affect, and possibly impair, any market
that might develop in the Company's securities until such time as they qualify
for listing on NASDAQ or on another exchange which would make them exempt from
applicability of the "penny stock" regulations. See "Risk Factors -- Regulation
of Penny Stocks."
9
<PAGE>
Company management believes that various types of potential merger or
acquisition candidates might find a business combination with the Company to be
attractive. These include acquisition candidates desiring to create a public
market for their shares in order to enhance liquidity for current shareholders,
acquisition candidates which have long-term plans for raising capital through
the public sale of securities and believe that the possible prior existence of a
public market for their securities would be beneficial, and acquisition
candidates which plan to acquire additional assets through issuance of
securities rather than for cash, and believe that the possibility of development
of a public market for their securities will be of assistance in that process.
Acquisition candidates which have a need for an immediate cash infusion are not
likely to find a potential business combination with the Company to be an
attractive alternative.
There are no loan arrangements or arrangements for any financing
whatsoever relating to any business opportunities.
Form of Acquisition
--------------------
It is impossible to predict the manner in which the Company may
participate in a business opportunity. Specific business opportunities will be
reviewed as well as the respective needs and desires of the Company and the
promoters of the opportunity and, upon the basis of that review and the relative
negotiating strength of the Company and such promoters, the legal structure or
method deemed by management to be suitable will be selected. Such structure may
include, but is not limited to leases, purchase and sale agreements, licenses,
joint ventures and other contractual arrangements. The Company may act directly
or indirectly through an interest in a partnership, corporation or other form of
organization. Implementing such structure may require the merger, consolidation
or reorganization of the Company with other corporations or forms of business
organization, and although it is likely, there is no assurance that the Company
would be the surviving entity. In addition, the present management and
stockholders of the Company most likely will not have control of a majority of
the voting shares of the Company following a reorganization transaction. As part
of such a transaction, the Company's existing directors may resign and new
directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.
It is likely that the Company will acquire its participation in a
business opportunity through the issuance of Common Stock or other securities of
10
<PAGE>
the Company. Although the terms of any such transaction cannot be predicted, it
should be noted that in certain circumstances the criteria for determining
whether or not an acquisition is a so-called "tax free" reorganization under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, depends upon the issuance to the stockholders of
the acquired company of a controlling interest (i.e. 80% or more) of the common
stock of the combined entities immediately following the reorganization. If a
transaction were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than
other "tax free" provisions provided under the Internal Revenue Code, the
Company's current stockholders would retain in the aggregate 20% or less of the
total issued and outstanding shares. This could result in substantial additional
dilution in the equity of those who were stockholders of the Company prior to
such reorganization. Any such issuance of additional shares might also be done
simultaneously with a sale or transfer of shares representing a controlling
interest in the Company by the current officers, directors and principal
shareholders. (See "Description of Business - General").
It is anticipated that any new securities issued in any reorganization
would be issued in reliance upon exemptions, if any are available, from
registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some
circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of the transaction, the Company
may agree to register such securities either at the time the transaction is
consummated, or under certain conditions or at specified times thereafter. The
issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any
trading market that might develop in the Company's securities may have a
depressive effect upon such market.
The Company will participate in a business opportunity only after the
negotiation and execution of a written agreement. Although the terms of such
agreement cannot be predicted, generally such an agreement would require
specific representations and warranties by all of the parties thereto, specify
certain events of default, detail the terms of closing and the conditions which
must be satisfied by each of the parties thereto prior to such closing, outline
the manner of bearing costs if the transaction is not closed, set forth remedies
upon default, and include miscellaneous other terms.
As a general matter, the Company anticipates that it, and/or its
officers and principal shareholders will enter into a letter of intent with the
management, principals or owners of a prospective business opportunity prior to
signing a binding agreement. Such a letter of intent will set forth the terms of
11
<PAGE>
the proposed acquisition but will not bind any of the parties to consummate the
transaction. Execution of a letter of intent will by no means indicate that
consummation of an acquisition is probable. Neither the Company nor any of the
other parties to the letter of intent will be bound to consummate the
acquisition unless and until a definitive agreement concerning the acquisition
as described in the preceding paragraph is executed. Even after a definitive
agreement is executed, it is possible that the acquisition would not be
consummated should any party elect to exercise any right provided in the
agreement to terminate it on specified grounds.
It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business
opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant
agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial
management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys
and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business
opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation would
not be recoverable. Moreover, because many providers of goods and services
require compensation at the time or soon after the goods and services are
provided, the inability of the Company to pay until an indeterminate future time
may make it impossible to procure goods and services.
In all probability, upon completion of an acquisition or merger, there
will be a change in control through issuance of substantially more shares of
common stock. Further, in conjunction with an acquisition or merger, it is
likely that management may offer to sell a controlling interest at a price not
relative to or reflective of any value of the shares sold by management, and at
a price which could not be achieved by individual shareholders at the time.
Investment Company Act and Other Regulation
--------------------------------------------
The Company may participate in a business opportunity by purchasing,
trading or selling the securities of such business. The Company does not,
however, intend to engage primarily in such activities. Specifically, the
Company intends to conduct its activities so as to avoid being classified as an
"investment company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment
Act"), and therefore to avoid application of the costly and restrictive
registration and other provisions of the Investment Act, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder.
12
<PAGE>
Section 3(a) of the Investment Act contains the definition of an
"investment company," and it excludes any entity that does not engage primarily
in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, or that does
not engage in the business of investing, owning, holding or trading "investment
securities" (defined as "all securities other than government securities or
securities of majority-owned subsidiaries") the value of which exceeds 40% of
the value of its total assets (excluding government securities, cash or cash
items). The Company intends to implement its business plan in a manner which
will result in the availability of this exception from the definition of
"investment company." Consequently, the Company's participation in a business or
opportunity through the purchase and sale of investment securities will be
limited.
The Company's plan of business may involve changes in its capital
structure, management, control and business, especially if it consummates a
reorganization as discussed above. Each of these areas is regulated by the
Investment Act, in order to protect purchasers of investment company securities.
Since the Company will not register as an investment company, stockholders will
not be afforded these protections.
Any securities which the Company might acquire in exchange for its
Common Stock are expected to be "restricted securities" within the meaning of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"). If the Company elects to
resell such securities, such sale cannot proceed unless a registration statement
has been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission or an
exemption from registration is available. Section 4(1) of the Act, which exempts
sales of securities not involving a distribution, would in all likelihood be
available to permit a private sale. Although the plan of operation does not
contemplate resale of securities acquired, if such a sale were to be necessary,
the Company would be required to comply with the provisions of the Act to effect
such resale.
An acquisition made by the Company may be in an industry which is
regulated or licensed by federal, state or local authorities. Compliance with
such regulations can be expected to be a time-consuming and expensive process.
Competition
------------
The Company expects to encounter substantial competition in its efforts
to locate attractive opportunities, primarily from business development
companies, venture capital partnerships and corporations, venture capital
affiliates of large industrial and financial companies, small investment
companies, and wealthy individuals. Many of these entities will have
significantly greater experience, resources and managerial capabilities than the
Company and will therefore be in a better position than the Company to obtain
access to attractive business opportunities. The Company also will possibly
experience competition from other public "blank check" companies, some of which
may have more funds available than does the Company.
13
<PAGE>
No Rights of Dissenting Shareholders
-------------------------------------
The Company does not intend to provide Company shareholders with
complete disclosure documentation including audited financial statements,
concerning a possible target company prior to acquisition, because the Florida
Business Corporation Act vests authority in the Board of Directors to decide and
approve matters involving acquisitions within certain restrictions. Any
transaction would be structured as an acquisition, not a merger, with the
Registrant being the parent company and the acquiree being merged into a wholly
owned subsidiary. Therefore, a shareholder will have no right of dissent under
Florida law.
No Target Candidates for Acquisition
-------------------------------------
None of the Company's Officers, Directors, promoters, affiliates, or
associates have had any preliminary contact or discussion with any specific
candidate for acquisition. There are no present plans, proposals, arrangements,
or understandings with any representatives of the owners of any business or
company regarding the possibility of an acquisition transaction.
Administrative Offices
-----------------------
At year end, the Company had a mailing address at 465 Ocean Drive, 3224,
Miami Beach, Florida, which is the office address of its President, Scott
Deitler. Other than this mailing address, the Company does not currently
maintain any other office facilities, and does not anticipate the need for
maintaining office facilities at any time in the foreseeable future. The Company
pays no rent or other fees for the use of this mailing address. Legal counsel
will not be involved in any day to day activities but will handle securities
related and corporate matters for the Company, so long as he is engaged to do
so.
14
<PAGE>
Employees
----------
The Company is a development stage company and currently has no employees.
Management of the Company expects to use consultants, attorneys and accountants
as necessary, and does not anticipate a need to engage any full-time employees
so long as it is seeking and evaluating business opportunities. The need for
employees and their availability will be addressed in connection with the
decision whether or not to acquire or participate in specific business
opportunities. There is no current plan under which, remuneration may be paid to
or accrued for the benefit of, the Company's officers prior to, or in
conjunction with, the completion of a business acquisition for services actually
rendered, and the company has adopted a resolution and policy which precludes
payment of any compensation or finder's fees to officers or directors. See
"Executive Compensation" and under "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
Risk Factors
-------------
1. Conflicts of Interest. Certain conflicts of interest may exist between the
Company and its officers and directors. They have other business interests to
which they devote their attention, and may be expected to continue to do so
although management time should be devoted to the business of the Company. As a
result, conflicts of interest may arise that can be resolved only through
exercise of such judgment as is consistent with fiduciary duties to the Company.
See "Management," and "Conflicts of Interest."
It is anticipated that Company's officers and directors may actively
negotiate or otherwise consent to the purchase of a portion of his common stock
as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition
transaction. In this process, the Company's officers may consider his own
personal pecuniary benefit rather than the best interests of other Company
shareholders, and the other Company shareholders are not expected to be afforded
the opportunity to approve or consent to any particular stock buy-out
transaction. See "Conflicts of Interest."
2. Need For Additional Financing. The Company has very limited funds, and such
funds may not be adequate to take advantage of any available business
opportunities. Even if the Company's funds prove to be sufficient to acquire an
interest in, or complete a transaction with, a business opportunity, the Company
may not have enough capital to exploit the opportunity. The ultimate success of
15
<PAGE>
the Company may depend upon its ability to raise additional capital. The Company
has not investigated the availability, source, or terms that might govern the
acquisition of additional capital and will not do so until it determines a need
for additional financing. If additional capital is needed, there is no assurance
that funds will be available from any source or, if available, that they can be
obtained on terms acceptable to the Company. If not available, the Company's
operations will be limited to those that can be financed with its modest
capital.
3. Regulation of Penny Stocks. The Company's securities, when available for
trading, will be subject to a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that
imposes special sales practice requirements upon broker-dealers who sell such
securities to persons other than established customers or accredited investors.
For purposes of the rule, the phrase "accredited investors" means, in general
terms, institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000, or individuals having a
net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or having an annual income that exceeds
$200,000 (or that, when combined with a spouse's income, exceeds $300,000). For
transactions covered by the rule, the broker-dealer must make a special
suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written
agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the rule may
affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company's securities and also
may affect the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell their securities
in any market that might develop therefore.
In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a number
of rules to regulate "penny stocks." Such rules include Rules 3a51-1, 15g-1,
15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6, 15g-7, and 15g-9 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because the securities of the Company may
constitute "penny stocks" within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply
to the Company and to its securities. The rules may further affect the ability
of owners of Shares to sell the securities of the Company in any market that
might develop for them.
Shareholders should be aware that, according to Securities and Exchange
Commission, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from
patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for
the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the
promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of
purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) "boiler room"
16
<PAGE>
practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price
projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed
bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the
wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after
prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting
inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. The
Company's management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in
the penny stock market. Although the Company does not expect to be in a position
to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in
the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations
to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to the
Company's securities.
4.Lack of Operating History. The Company was formed on March 4, 1999. Due to the
special risks inherent in the investigation, acquisition, or involvement in a
new business opportunity, The Company must be regarded as a new or start-up
venture with all of the unforeseen costs, expenses, problems, and difficulties
to which such ventures are subject.
5. No Assurance of Success or Profitability. There is no assurance that the
Company will acquire a favorable business opportunity. Even if the Company
should become involved in a business opportunity, there is no assurance that it
will generate revenues or profits, or that the market price of the Company's
Common Stock will be increased thereby.
6. Possible Business - Not Identified and Highly Risky. The Company has not
identified and has no commitments to enter into or acquire a specific business
opportunity and therefore can disclose the risks and hazards of a business or
opportunity that it may enter into in only a general manner, and cannot disclose
the risks and hazards of any specific business or opportunity that it may enter
into. An investor can expect a potential business opportunity to be quite risky.
The Company's acquisition of or participation in a business opportunity will
likely be highly illiquid and could result in a total loss to the Company and
its stockholders if the business or opportunity proves to be unsuccessful. See
Item 1 "Description of Business."
7. Type of Business Acquired. The type of business to be acquired may be one
that desires to avoid effecting its own public offering and the accompanying
expense, delays, uncertainties, and federal and state requirements which purport
to protect investors. Because of the Company's limited capital, it is more
likely than not that any acquisition by the Company will involve other parties
whose primary interest is the acquisition of control of a publicly traded
company. Moreover, any business opportunity acquired may be currently
unprofitable or present other negative factors.
17
<PAGE>
8. Impracticability of Exhaustive Investigation. The Company's limited funds and
the lack of full-time management will likely make it impracticable to conduct a
complete and exhaustive investigation and analysis of a business opportunity
before the Company commits its capital or other resources thereto. Management
decisions, therefore, will likely be made without detailed feasibility studies,
independent analysis, market surveys and the like which, if the Company had more
funds available to it, would be desirable. The Company will be particularly
dependent in making decisions upon information provided by the promoter, owner,
sponsor, or others associated with the business opportunity seeking the
Company's participation. A significant portion of the Company's available funds
may be expended for investigative expenses and other expenses related to
preliminary aspects of completing an acquisition transaction, whether or not any
business opportunity investigated is eventually acquired.
9. Lack of Diversification. Because of the limited financial resources that the
Company has, it is unlikely that the Company will be able to diversify its
acquisitions or operations. The Company's probable inability to diversify its
activities into more than one area will subject the Company to economic
fluctuations within a particular business or industry and therefore increase the
risks associated with the Company's operations.
10. Reliance upon Financial Statements. The Company generally will require
audited financial statements from companies that it proposes to acquire. Given
cases where audited financials are not available, the Company will have to rely
upon interim period unaudited information received from target companies'
management that has not been verified by outside auditors. The lack of the type
of independent verification which audited financial statements would provide,
increases the risk that the Company, in evaluating an acquisition with such a
target company, will not have the benefit of full and accurate information about
the financial condition and recent interim operating history of the target
company. This risk increases the prospect that the acquisition of such a company
might prove to be an unfavorable one for the Company or the holders of the
Company's securities.
18
<PAGE>
Moreover, the Company will be subject to the reporting provisions of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and thus
will be required to furnish certain information about significant acquisitions,
including audited financial statements for any business that it acquires.
Consequently, acquisition prospects that do not have, or are unable to provide
reasonable assurances that they will be able to obtain, the required audited
statements would not be considered by the Company to be appropriate for
acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are
applicable. Should the Company, during the time it remains subject to the
reporting provisions of the Exchange Act, complete an acquisition of an entity
for which audited financial statements prove to be unobtainable, the Company
would be exposed to enforcement actions by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") and to corresponding administrative sanctions,
including permanent injunctions against the Company and its management. The
legal and other costs of defending a Commission enforcement action would have
material, adverse consequences for the Company and its business. The imposition
of administrative sanctions would subject the Company to further adverse
consequences.
In addition, the lack of audited financial statements would prevent the
securities of the Company from becoming eligible for listing on NASDAQ, or on
any existing stock exchange. Moreover, the lack of such financial statements is
likely to discourage broker-dealers from becoming or continuing to serve as
market makers in the securities of the Company. Without audited financial
statements, the Company would almost certainly be unable to offer securities
under a registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, and the
ability of the Company to raise capital would be significantly limited until
such financial statements were to become available.
11. Other Regulation. An acquisition made by the Company may be of a business
that is subject to regulation or licensing by federal, state, or local
authorities. Compliance with such regulations and licensing can be expected to
be a time-consuming, expensive process and may limit other investment
opportunities of the Company.
12. Dependence upon Management; Limited Participation of Management. The Company
currently has only two individuals who are serving as its officers and directors
on a part time basis. The Company will be heavily dependent upon their skills,
talents, and abilities to implement its business plan, and may, from time to
time, find that the inability of the officers and directors to devote their full
time attention to the business of the Company results in a delay in progress
toward implementing its business plan. See "Management." Because investors will
not be able to evaluate the merits of possible business acquisitions by the
Company, they should critically assess the information concerning the Company's
officers and directors.
19
<PAGE>
13. Lack of Continuity in Management. The Company does not have an employment
agreement with its officers and directors, and as a result, there is no
assurance they will continue to manage the Company in the future. In connection
with acquisition of a business opportunity, it is likely the current officers
and directors of the Company may resign subject to compliance with Section 14f
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A decision to resign will be based upon
the identity of the business opportunity and the nature of the transaction, and
is likely to occur without the vote or consent of the stockholders of the
Company.
14. Indemnification of Officers and Directors. Florida Statutes provide for the
indemnification of its directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain
circumstances, against attorney's fees and other expenses incurred by them in
any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with
or activities on behalf of the Company. The Company will also bear the expenses
of such litigation for any of its directors, officers, employees, or agents,
upon such person's promise to repay the Company therefor if it is ultimately
determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification.
This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by the
Company which it will be unable to recoup.
15. Director's Liability Limited. Florida Statutes exclude personal liability of
its directors to the Company and its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty except in certain specified circumstances. Accordingly,
the Company will have a much more limited right of action against its directors
than otherwise would be the case. This provision does not affect the liability
of any director under federal or applicable state securities laws.
16. Dependence upon Outside Advisors. To supplement the business experience of
its officers and directors, the Company may be required to employ accountants,
technical experts, appraisers, attorneys, or other consultants or advisors. The
selection of any such advisors will be made by the Company's President without
any input from stockholders. Furthermore, it is anticipated that such persons
may be engaged on an "as needed" basis without a continuing fiduciary or other
obligation to the Company. In the event the President of the Company considers
it necessary to hire outside advisors, he may elect to hire persons who are
affiliates, if they are able to provide the required services.
20
<PAGE>
17. Leveraged Transactions. There is a possibility that any acquisition of a
business opportunity by the Company may be leveraged, i.e., the Company may
finance the acquisition of the business opportunity by borrowing against the
assets of the business opportunity to be acquired, or against the projected
future revenues or profits of the business opportunity. This could increase the
Company's exposure to larger losses. A business opportunity acquired through a
leveraged transaction is profitable only if it generates enough revenues to
cover the related debt and expenses. Failure to make payments on the debt
incurred to purchase the business opportunity could result in the loss of a
portion or all of the assets acquired. There is no assurance that any business
opportunity acquired through a leveraged transaction will generate sufficient
revenues to cover the related debt and expenses.
18. Competition. The search for potentially profitable business opportunities is
intensely competitive. The Company expects to be at a disadvantage when
competing with many firms that have substantially greater financial and
management resources and capabilities than the Company. These competitive
conditions will exist in any industry in which the Company may become
interested.
19. No Foreseeable Dividends. The Company has not paid dividends on its common
stock and does not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future.
20. Loss of Control by Present Management and Stockholders. The Company may
consider an acquisition in which the Company would issue as consideration for
the business opportunity to be acquired an amount of the Company's authorized
but unissued Common Stock that would, upon issuance, represent the great
majority of the voting power and equity of the Company. The result of such an
acquisition would be that the acquired company's stockholders and management
would control the Company, and the Company's management could be replaced by
persons unknown at this time. Such a merger would result in a greatly reduced
percentage of ownership of the Company by its current shareholders. In addition,
the Company's major shareholders could sell control blocks of stock at a premium
price to the acquired company's stockholders.
21
<PAGE>
21. No Public Market Exists. There is no public market for the Company's common
stock, and no assurance can be given that a market will develop or that a
shareholder ever will be able to liquidate his investment without considerable
delay, if at all. If a market should develop, the price may be highly volatile.
Factors such as those discussed in this "Risk Factors" section may have a
significant impact upon the market price of the securities offered hereby. Owing
to the low price of the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to
effect transactions in the securities. Even if a purchaser finds a broker
willing to effect a transaction in these securities, the combination of
brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and any other selling costs
may exceed the selling price. Further, many lending institutions will not permit
the use of such securities as collateral for any loans.
22. Rule 144 Sales. All of the outstanding shares of Common Stock held by
present officers, directors, and stockholders are "restricted securities" within
the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As
restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective
registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable
exemptions from registration under the Act and as required under applicable
state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who has held
restricted securities for one year may, under certain conditions, sell every
three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed
the greater of 1.0% of a company's outstanding common stock or the average
weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks prior to the sale.
23. Blue Sky Considerations. Because the securities registered hereunder have
not been registered for resale under the blue sky laws of any state, the holders
of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market
that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant
state blue-sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the
securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. Some jurisdictions may
not under any circumstances allow the trading or resale of blind-pool or
"blank-check" securities. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary
market for the Company's securities to be a limited one.
22
<PAGE>
Item 2. Property
-------------------------------
The Company does not have any formal offices at year end. Records are
maintained and mail received at 7010 NW 100 Drive, Bldg. A, Ste. #101, Houston,
TX 77092. The company owns no real property.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
------------------------------------
The Company is a party to no pending legal proceedings, nor is its property
subject to such proceedings, at year end 1999.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No matters were submitted during the fiscal year covered by this report to
a vote of security holders of the Company, through the solicitation of proxies
or otherwise.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of the date of this report, there has been no trading or quotation
of the Company's common stock. The range of high and low trade quotations for
each fiscal quarter since the last report, as reported by the National Quotation
Bureau Incorporated, was as follows
1999 High Low
First quarter * *
Second quarter * *
Third quarter * *
Fourth quarter * *
1998 High Low
First quarter * *
Second quarter * *
Third quarter * *
Fourth quarter * *
1997 High Low
First quarter * *
Second quarter * *
Third quarter * *
Fourth quarter * *
* No quotations
The above quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
As of December 31, 1999, there were 5 record holders of the Company's
common Stock.
The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock
and does not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future.
23
<PAGE>
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Financial Condition and Changes in Financial Condition
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No operations were conducted and no operating revenues were generated in
the fiscal year. The Company had no income in 1999, except interest. The Company
at year end had no capital, cash of $3,257, and no other assets. The Company at
year end was illiquid and needed cash infusions from shareholders to provide
capital, or loans from any sources.
Transitional Report
-------------------
The Company elected to use a calendar year for accounting purposes due to
its merger with Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. in March 2000. Pathobiotek uses a
normal calendar year for accounting.
Results of Operations for the period ended December 31, 1999 from Inception,
March 4, 1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company incurred expenses totalling $4,592 in 1999 from inception. The
Company had no operations in 1999 and only $49 in interest income in 1999. The
net loss for 1999 was ($4,656) from inception. The net loss per share was less
than ($.01) in 1999. A continuation of the trend of net losses should be
expected to continue in the future until some profitable operations are
achieved, if ever any are acquired or developed.
Liquidity & Capital Resources
-----------------------------
The company had nominal cash at year end, $3,257, and no other capital
resources. The company will be dependent on its shareholders for loans for
expenses, and has no capital availability except through private sales of
treasury stocks, none of which has been arranged.
24
<PAGE>
Item 7. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please refer to pages F-1 through F-10.
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AJ. Robbins, P.C., Certified Public Accountants and Consultants, were
retained in 1999 as auditors for the Company for the year ended December 31,
1999 and thereafter.
In connection with audits of two most recent fiscal years and any interim
period preceding resignation, no disagreements exist with any former accountant
on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope of procedure, which disagreements if not resolved
to the satisfaction of the former accountant would have caused him to make
reference in connection with his report to the subject matter of the
disagreement(s).
The decision to change accountants was approved by the Board of Directors
as the registrant has no audit committee.
The principal accountants' reports on the financial statements for any of
the past two years contained no adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion nor
was qualified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles except
for the "going concern" qualification.
25
<PAGE>
PART III
Item 9. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant and
Compliance with Section 16(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The directors and executive officers currently serving the Company are
as follows:
NAME POSITION HELD TENURE
Scott A. Deitler* President and Director Annual since 1999
James W. Toot* Secretary, Treasurer Annual since 1999
and Director
Jeff P. Ploen* Director Annual since 1999
* These officers and Directors resigned in March, 2000, at the time of the
business combination with Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. See 8-K dated March 7,
2000.
The directors named above will serve until the next annual meeting of
the Company's stockholders. Thereafter, directors will be elected for one-year
terms at the annual stockholders' meeting. Officers will hold their positions at
the pleasure of the board of directors, absent any employment agreement, of
which none currently exists or is contemplated. There is no arrangement or
understanding between the directors and officers of the Company and any other
person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a
director or officer.
The directors and officers of the Company will devote such time to the
Company's affairs on an "as needed" basis, but less than 20 hours per month. As
a result, the actual amount of time which they will devote to the Company's
affairs is unknown and is likely to vary substantially from month to month.
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
SCOTT A. DEITLER, age 43, President and director since inception, received
a B.A. in Business and Conservation from the University of Colorado in 1978.
From 1987 to 1995, he was President and a director of Colorado Coin Co., in
Boulder, Colorado. From 1993 to 1998, he was President of Ulta Travel, Inc., a
travel agency. He is President and Director of J.S.J. Capital Corp. (1999),
J.S.J. Capital II, Inc. (1999), J.S.J. Capital III, Inc. (1999), Marathon
Marketing Corp. (1999), Advanced Ceiling Supplies, Inc. (1997, Cross Check Corp.
(1997), all of which are shell companies without specific business, but which
are seeking an acquisition or merger.
JAMES W. TOOT, age 44, Secretary and director since 1999. Mr. Toot was a
licensed securities representative from 1981 to 1996. From 1986 to 1990, he was
a Vice President of Rocky Mountain Securities, Inc. From 1990 to 1994, he was a
Vice President of Cohig & Associates, Inc., a broker/dealer. From 1994 to 1996,
he was Vice President of Rocky Mountain Securities, Inc. Since 1997, he has been
Secretary and director of J.S.J. Capital Corp. (1999), J.S.J. Capital II, Inc.
(1999), J.S.J. Capital III, Inc. (1999), Marathon Marketing Corp. (1999),
Advanced Ceiling Supplies, Inc. (1997, Cross Check Corp. (1997), all of which
are shell companies without specific business, but which are seeking an
acquisition or merger.
26
<PAGE>
JEFF P. PLOEN, age 49, is a director and Treasurer of the Company since
1999. He received a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of
Florida. He was Branch Manager of Neidiger Tucker Bruner, Inc. (1990 to 1992)
and Branch Manager of Cohig & Associates, Inc. (1992 to 1993). He was a licensed
securities representative from 1972 to 1994. He was C.E.O. of Tamarron
Investments, Inc. from 1993 to 1995. He has been President and a Director of J.
Paul Consulting Corp. since 1995. He has been a director and Treasurer of J.S.J.
Capital Corp. (1999), J.S.J. Capital II, Inc. (1999), J.S.J. Capital III., Inc.
(1999), Cross Check Corp. (1997-1999), and Marathon Marketing Corp. (1999), all
of which are shell companies without specific business, but which are seeking
an acquisition or merger.
Management will devote minimal time to the operations of the Company,
and any time spent will be devoted to screening and assessing and, if warranted,
negotiating to acquire business opportunities.
None of the Company's officers and/or directors receives any
compensation for their respective services rendered to the Company, nor have
they received such compensation in the past. They all have agreed to act without
compensation until authorized by the Board of Directors, which is not expected
to occur until the Company has generated revenues from operations after
consummation of a merger or acquisition. As of the date of filing this report,
the Company has no funds available to pay officers or directors. Further, none
of the officers or directors is accruing any compensation pursuant to any
agreement with the Company. No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option
or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company
for the benefit of its employees.
It is possible that, after the Company successfully consummates a
merger or acquisition with an unaffiliated entity, that entity may desire to
employ or retain one or a number of members of the Company's management for the
purposes of providing services to the surviving entity, or otherwise provide
other compensation to such persons. However, the Company has adopted a policy
whereby the offer of any post-transaction remuneration to members of management
will not be a consideration in the Company's decision to undertake any proposed
transaction. Each member of management has agreed to disclose to the Company's
Board of Directors any discussions concerning possible compensation to be paid
to them by any entity which proposes to undertake a transaction with the Company
and further, to abstain from voting on such transaction. Therefore, as a
practical matter, if each member of the Company's Board of Directors were
offered compensation in any form from any prospective merger or acquisition
candidate, the proposed transaction would not be approved by the Company's Board
of Directors as a result of the inability of the Board to affirmatively approve
such a transaction.
It is possible that persons associated with management may refer a
prospective merger or acquisition candidate to the Company. In the event the
Company consummates a transaction with any entity referred by associates of
management, it is possible that such an associate will be compensated for their
referral in the form of a finder's fee. It is anticipated that this fee will be
either in the form of restricted Common Stock issued by the Company as part of
the terms of the proposed transaction, or will be in the form of cash
consideration. However, if such compensation is in the form of cash, such
payment will be tendered by the acquisition or merger
27
<PAGE>
candidate, because the Company has insufficient cash available. The amount of
such finder's fee cannot be determined as of the date of filing this report, but
is expected to be comparable to consideration normally paid in like
transactions. No member of management of the Company will receive any finders
fee, either directly or indirectly, as a result of their respective efforts to
implement the Company's business plan outlined herein.
The Company has adopted a policy that its affiliates and management
shall not be issued further common shares of the Company, except in the event
discussed in the preceding paragraphs.
PREVIOUS "BLANK CHECK" OR "SHELL" COMPANY INVOLVEMENT
Management of the Company has been involved in prior private "blank
check" or "shell" companies as follows:
Each of the members of management are also officers and Directors of
certain other "shell" companies, as follows: J.S.J. Capital Corp., J.S.J.
Capital II, Inc., J.S.J. Capital III, Inc., Cross Check Corp. and Marathon
Marketing Corp. Scott Deitler and James Toot are President and Secretary,
respectively, and Directors of Advanced Ceiling Supplies, Inc. None of the
companies have completed an acquisition or merger and all of the companies are
in the development stage.
INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
As permitted by Florida Statutes, the Company may indemnify its
directors and officers against expenses and liabilities they incur to defend,
settle, or satisfy any civil or criminal action brought against them on account
of their being or having been Company directors or officers unless, in any such
action, they are adjudged to have acted with gross negligence or willful
misconduct. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons
controlling the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the Company has
been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in that Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable.
EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY
The Florida Business Corporation Act excludes personal liability for
its directors for monetary damages based upon any violation of their fiduciary
duties as directors, except as to liability for any breach of the duty of
loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, acts in violation of the Florida
Corporation Act, or any transaction from which a director receives an improper
personal benefit. This exclusion of liability does not limit any right which a
director may have to be indemnified and does not affect any director's liability
under federal or applicable state securities laws.
28
<PAGE>
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The officers and directors of the Company will not devote more than a
portion of their time to the affairs of the Company. There will be occasions
when the time requirements of the Company's business conflict with the demands
of their other business and investment activities. Such conflicts may require
that the Company attempt to employ additional personnel. There is no assurance
that the services of such persons will be available or that they can be obtained
upon terms favorable to the Company.
Conflicts of Interest - General. Certain of the officers and directors
of the Company may be directors and/or principal shareholders of other companies
and, therefore, could face conflicts of interest with respect to potential
acquisitions. In addition, officers and directors of the Company may in the
future participate in business ventures which could be deemed to compete
directly with the Company. Additional conflicts of interest and non-arms length
transactions may also arise in the future in the event the Company's officers or
directors are involved in the management of any firm with which the Company
transacts business. The Company's Board of Directors has adopted a policy that
the Company will not seek a merger with, or acquisition of, any entity in which
management serve as officers or directors, or in which they or their family
members own or hold a controlling ownership interest. Although the Board of
Directors could elect to change this policy, the Board of Directors has no
present intention to do so. In addition, if the Company and other companies with
which the Company's officers and directors are affiliated both desire to take
advantage of a potential business opportunity, then the Board of Directors has
agreed that said opportunity should be available to each such company in the
order in which such companies registered or became current in the filing of
annual reports under the Exchange Act subsequent to January 1, 1999.
The Company's officers and directors may actively negotiate or
otherwise consent to the purchase of a portion of their common stock as a
condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition
transaction. It is anticipated that a substantial premium over the initial cost
of such shares may be paid by the purchaser in conjunction with any sale of
shares by the Company's officers and directors which is made as a condition to,
or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. The fact
that a substantial premium may be paid to the Company's officers and directors
to acquire their shares creates a potential conflict of interest for them in
satisfying their fiduciary duties to the Company and its other shareholders.
Even though such a sale could result in a substantial profit to them, they would
be legally required to make the decision based upon the best interests of the
Company and the Company's other shareholders, rather than their own personal
pecuniary benefit.
29
<PAGE>
Management will devote minimal time to the operations of the Company,
and any time spent will be devoted to screening and assessing and, if warranted,
negotiating to acquire business opportunities.
None of the Company's officers and/or directors receives any
compensation for their respective services rendered to the Company, nor have
they received such compensation in the past. They all have agreed to act without
compensation until authorized by the Board of Directors, which is not expected
to occur until the Company has generated revenues from operations after
consummation of a merger or acquisition. As of the date of filing this report,
the Company has no funds available to pay officers or directors. Further, none
of the officers or directors is accruing any compensation pursuant to any
agreement with the Company. No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option
or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company
for the benefit of its employees.
It is possible that, after the Company successfully consummates a merger or
acquisition with an unaffiliated entity, that entity may desire to employ or
retain one or a number of members of the Company's management for the purposes
of providing services to the surviving entity, or otherwise provide other
compensation to such persons. However, the Company has adopted a policy whereby
the offer of any post-transaction remuneration to members of management will not
be a consideration in the Company's decision to undertake any proposed
transaction. Each member of management has agreed to disclose to the Company's
Board of Directors any discussions concerning possible compensation to be paid
to them by any entity which proposes to undertake a transaction with the Company
and further, to abstain from voting on such transaction. Therefore, as a
practical matter, if each member of the Company's Board of Directors were
offered compensation in any form from any prospective merger or acquisition
candidate, the proposed transaction would not be approved by the Company's Board
of Directors as a result of the inability of the Board to affirmatively approve
such a transaction.
Conflicts of Interest
Members of the Company's management are associated with other firms
involved in a range of business activities. Consequently, there are potential
inherent conflicts of interest in their acting as officers and directors of the
Company. Insofar as the officers and directors are engaged in other business
activities, management anticipates it will devote only a minor amount of time to
the Company's affairs.
30
<PAGE>
Item 10. Executive Compensation
----------------------------------------------
The Company accrued no compensation to the executive officers as a
group for services rendered to the Company in all capacities during the 1999
fiscal year. No one executive officer received, or has accrued for his benefit,
in excess of $60,000 for the year. No cash bonuses were or are to be paid to
such persons.
The Company does not have any employee incentive stock option plans.
There are no plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation was
paid or distributed during the last fiscal year, or is proposed to be paid or
distributed in the future, to the executive officers of the Company. No other
compensation not described above was paid or distributed during the last fiscal
year to the executive officers of the Company. There are no compensatory plans
or arrangements, with respect to any executive office of the Company, which
result or will result from the resignation, retirement or any other termination
of such individual's employment with the Company or from a change in control of
the Company or a change in the individual's responsibilities following a change
in control.
31
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE OF EXECUTIVES
----------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Awards
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Name & Year Salary Bonus Other Annual Restricted Securities
Principal Position ($) ($) Compensation Stock Underlying
($) Award(s) Options/
($) SARS (#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott A. Deitler, 1997 0 0 0 0 0
President 1998 0 0 0 0 0
1999 0 0 0 0 0
James W. Toot, 1997 0 0 0 0 0
Secretary 1998 0 0 0 0 0
1999 0 0 0 0 0
Jeff P. Ploen 1997 0 0 0 0 0
Treasurer 1998 0 0 0 0 0
1999 0 0 0 0 0
</TABLE>
Directors' Compensation
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Name Annual Meeting Consulting Number Number of
Retainer Fees ($) Fees/Other of Securities
Fee($) Fees ($) Shares Underlying
(#) Options
SARS (#)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Director, Scott A. Deitler 0 0 0 0 0
B. Director, James W. Toot 0 0 0 0 0
C. Director, Jeff P. Ploen 0 0 0 0 0
</TABLE>
Option/SAR Grants Table (None)
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year an FY-End Option/SAR
value (None)
32
<PAGE>
Long Term Incentive Plans - Awards in Last Fiscal Year (None)
No officer or director has received any other remuneration in the two
year period prior to the filing of this registration statement. There is no
current plan in existence, to pay or accrue compensation to its officers and
directors for services related to seeking business opportunities and completing
a merger or acquisition transaction. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions." The Company has no stock option, retirement, pension, or
profit-sharing programs for the benefit of directors, officers or other
employees, but the Board of Directors may recommend adoption of one or more such
programs in the future.
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table sets forth, as December 31, 1999, the number of shares
of Common Stock owned of record and beneficially by executive officers,
directors and persons who hold 5.0% or more of the outstanding Common Stock of
the Company. Also included are the shares held by all executive officers and
directors as a group.
SHAREHOLDERS/ NUMBER OF SHARES OWNERSHIP
BENEFICIAL OWNERS PERCENTAGE
------------------- ------------------ ----------
Scott A. Deitler 100,000 10%
President & Director
James W. Toot 224,000 22.4%
Secretary & Director
Jeff P. Ploen 224,000 22.4%
Treasurer & Director
Wintrade Financial, L.L.C. 85,000 8.5%
All directors and executive 633,000 63.3%
officers as a group (3 persons)
Each principal shareholder has sole investment power and sole voting power over
the shares.
33
<PAGE>
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
----------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
In 1999, the Company issued to its founding directors a total of
548,000 shares of Common Stock for a total of $244.64. In 1999, 2 persons
purchased 124,000 shares at $.00044 per share for a total of $55.36.
Certificates evidencing the Common Stock issued by the Company to these persons
have all been stamped with a restrictive legend, and are subject to stop
transfer orders by the Company. For additional information concerning
restrictions that are imposed upon the securities held by current stockholders,
and the responsibilities of such stockholders to comply with federal securities
laws in the disposition of such Common Stock, see "Risk Factors - Rule 144
Sales."
No officer, director, or affiliate of the Company has or proposes to
have any direct or indirect material interest in any asset proposed to be
acquired by the Company through security holdings, contracts, options, or
otherwise.
The Company has adopted a policy under which any consulting or finder's
fee that may be paid to a third party for consulting services to assist
management in evaluating a prospective business opportunity would be paid in
stock or in cash. Any such issuance of stock would be made on an ad hoc basis.
Accordingly, the Company is unable to predict whether or in what amount such a
stock issuance might be made.
Although management has no current plans to cause the Company to do so,
it is possible that the Company may enter into an agreement with an acquisition
candidate requiring the sale of all or a portion of the Common Stock held by the
Company's current stockholders to the acquisition candidate or principals
thereof, or to other individuals or business entities, or requiring some other
form of payment to the Company's current stockholders, or requiring the future
employment of specified officers and payment of salaries to them. It is more
likely than not that any sale of securities by the Company's current
stockholders to an acquisition candidate would be at a price substantially
higher than that originally paid by such stockholders. Any payment to current
stockholders in the context of an acquisition involving the Company would be
determined entirely by the largely unforeseeable terms of a future agreement
with an unidentified business entity.
34
<PAGE>
PART IV
Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
-------------------------------------------------
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Reports on Form 8-K:
None
2. Exhibits:
None
35
<PAGE>
INDEX
Form 10-K
Regulation Consecutive
S-K Number Exhibit Page Number
3.1 Articles of Incorporation *Incorporated by reference
to Registration Statement
10SB/12(g) #000-28519
3.2 Amendment to Articles of Incorporated by Reference
Incorporation to Registration Statement
10SB/12(g) #000-28519
3.2 Bylaws *Incorporated by reference
to Registration Statement
10SB/12(g) #000-28519
27.1 Financial Data Schedule EX-27.1
36
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES:
-----------
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATED: August 15, 2000
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
BY: /S/ ROBERT C. SIMPSON
-------------------------------
Robert C. Simpson, PhD, President
BY: /S/ LUTHER LINDENER
--------------------------------
Luther Lindener, MD, PhD, Secretary
Directors:
/S/ ROBERT C. SIMPSON
--------------------------------
Robert C. Simpson, PhD, Director
/S/ LUTHER LINDENER
--------------------------------
Luther Lindener, MD, PhD, Director
/S/ GREG MCDONALD
--------------------------------
Greg McDonald, PhD, Director
/S/ JOHN BONFIGLO
--------------------------------
John Bonfiglo, Director
/s/ ANDY BLASBAND
--------------------------------
Andy Blasband, PhD, Director
37
<PAGE>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
<PAGE>
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Independent Auditor's Report F-2
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet F-3
Statements of Operations F-4
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) F-5
Statements of Cash Flows F-6
Notes to Financial Statements F-7
<PAGE>
AJ. ROBBINS & PC
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
AND CONSULTANTS
3033 E. First Avenue, Suite 201
Denver, CO 80206
(303) 321-1281
Fax: (303) 321-1288
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Investra Enterprises, Inc.
Boulder, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Investra Enterprises, Inc. (a
development stage company) as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements
of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the
four months then ended, for the period from March 4, 1999 (inception) to August
31, 1999 and cumulative from March 4, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Investra Enterprises, Inc. as
of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the four months then ended and for the period from March 4, 1999 (inception) to
August 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
financial statements, the Company is in the development stage and has not
commenced operations. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital, complete a merger
with Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc. and ultimately achieve profitable operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ A.J. Robbins, PC
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
AND CONSULTANTS
Denver, Colorado
August 3, 2000
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1999
ASSETS
<S> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS, Cash $ 3,257
==================
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accrued interest, related party $ 113
Loans payable, related party 7,500
------------------
7,613
==================
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
672,000 shares issued and outstanding 300
(Deficit) accumulated during the development stage (4,656)
------------------
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (4,356)
------------------
$ 3,257
==================
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Cumulative
from
For the Period March 4,
For the Four From March 4, 1999
Months 1999 (Inception)
Ended (Inception) to to
December 31, August 31, December 31,
1999 1999 1999
----------------- ----------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE:
Interest income $ 49 $ - $ 49
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
EXPENSES:
General and administrative 4,513 79 4,592
Interest expense, related party 113 - 113
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Total Expenses 4,626 79 4,705
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
NET (LOSS) $ (4,577) $ (79) $ (4,656)
================= ================= =================
NET (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC $ (.01) $ *
================ ===============
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC 672,000 672,000
================= =================
*Less than $(.01)
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE PERIODS FROM MARCH 4, 1999 (INCEPTION)
TO AUGUST 31, 1999 AND
SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999
(Deficit)
Accumulated
During the
Common Stock Development
Shares Amount Stage Total
-------------- ---------------- ------------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances, March 4, 1999 - $ - $ - $ -
Issuance of stock on March 20, 1999 for
$.00045 per share 672,000 300 - 300
Net (loss) - - (79) (79)
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Balances, August 31, 1999 672,000 300 (79) 221
Net (loss) for the period - - (4,577) (4,577)
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Balances, December 31, 1999 672,000 $ 300 $ (4,656) $ (4,356)
================ ================ ================ ================
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-5
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cumulative
from
For the Period March 4,
For the Four From March 4, 1999
Months 1999 (Inception)
Ended (Inception) to to
December 31, August 31, December 31,
1999 1999 1999
----------------- ----------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM (TO) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) from operations $ (4,577) $ (79) $ (4,656)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used) by
Changes in:
Accrued interest, related party 113 - 113
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities (4,464) (79) (4,543)
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM (TO) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued for cash - 300 300
Proceeds from loans payable, related party 7,500 - 7,500
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 7,500 300 7,800
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
NET INCREASE IN CASH 3,036 221 3,257
CASH, beginning of period 221 - -
----------------- ----------------- ------------
CASH, end of period $ 3,257 $ 221 $ 3,257
================= ================= =================
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-6
<PAGE>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
History
Investra Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), a development stage company, was
organized under the laws of the State of Florida on March 4, 1999. The Company
is in the development stage as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 7. The fiscal year end is August 31.
Going Concern
The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a
going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction
of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company is in the
development stage and has not earned any revenues from operations to date.
The Company devoted its efforts to locating merger candidates. On March 6, 2000
the Company entered into a merger agreement with Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc.
(see Note 4). The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital, complete a merger
with Pathobiotek Diagnostics, Inc., and ultimately, achieve profitable
operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes pursuant to
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. Under this method, deferred
income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of
temporary differences between the tax basis of the assets and liabilities and
their financial amounts at year end.
For federal income tax purposes, substantially all expenses must be deferred
until the Company commences business and then they may be written off over a
60-month period. Therefore, $4,656 of net losses incurred in the period from
March 4, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999 have not been deducted for tax
purposes and represent a deferred tax asset. The Company is providing a
valuation allowance in the full amount of the deferred tax asset since there is
no assurance of future taxable income. Tax deductible losses can be carried
forward for 20 years until utilized, however, such loses may be subject to
limitations, in the event of a change of ownership.
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed based upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings
per share consists of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
plus the dilutive effects of options and warrants calculated using the treasury
stock method. In loss periods, dilutive common equivalent shares are excluded as
the effect would be anti-dilutive.
F-7
<PAGE>
INVESTRA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.
NOTE 2 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
During March 1999, the Company issued for cash 672,000 shares of its no par
value common stock to its officers and directors at $.00045 per share.
NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On October 5, 1999, the Company received loans from stockholders in the amount
of $7,500. The loans are due upon demand, with interest accruing at 6%.
NOTE 4 - CHANGE IN CONTROL
On March 6, 2000, the five stockholders of the Company sold a total of 672,000
shares, or 100% of the outstanding common stock of the Company to Pathobiotek
Diagnostics, Inc. (Pathobiotek) for $150,000.
Upon completion of the purchase of all issued and outstanding shares of the
Company, Pathobiotek merged with the Company as a wholly owned subsidiary, with
Pathobiotek being the surviving entity.
F-8