<PAGE>
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 2, 2000
Registration Statement No. 333-93913
================================================================================
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------
FORM N-2
/X/ REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
/X/ Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5
/ / Post-Effective Amendment No. ____________
---------------------
UTEK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
---------------------
202 South Wheeler Street
Plant City, Florida 33566
Address of principal executive offices (Number, Street, City, State and Zip
Code)
(813) 754-4330
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
---------------------
Sam I. Reiber, Esq., General Counsel
601 E. Twiggs Street
Tampa, Florida 35602
(813) 223-7509
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
---------------------
Copies to:
Jay M. Kaplowitz, Esq. Robert W. Walter, Esq.
GERSTEN, SAVAGE & KAPLOWITZ, LLP BERLINER ZISSER WALTER & GALLEGOS, P.C.
101 East 52nd Street, 9th Floor 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4700
New York, New York 10022 Denver, Colorado 80203
(212) 752-9700 (303) 830-1700
(212) 752-9713 (fax) (303) 830-1705 (fax)
---------------------
Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable
after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. / /
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered
on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act
of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with a dividend
reinvestment plan, check the following box: /X/
---------------------
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant
shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration
Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8 (a) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
================================================================================
<PAGE>
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
============================================================================================================
Proposed
Proposed Maximum
Maximum Aggregate Amount of
Title of Each Class of Amount Being Offering Price Offering Registration
Securities Being Registered Registered Per Security(1) Price Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock, par value $0.01........ 1,150,000(2) $ 6.00 $6,900,000 $ 1,821.60
Representative's Warrants ........... 100,000 $ .03 $ 3,000 (4)
Common Stock Issuable on Exercise
of Representative's Warrants ....... 100,000(3) $ 9.90 $ 990,000 $ 261.36
Total: .............................................................................. $ 2,082.96
============================================================================================================
</TABLE>
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
(2) Includes up to 150,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
underwriters' over-allotment option.
(3) Pursuant to Rule 416, this Registration Statement also covers an
indeterminable number of additional shares of Common Stock issuable as a
result of any future anti-dilution adjustments in accordance with the
terms of the Warrants.
(4) No fee due pursuant to Rule 457(g).
<PAGE>
CROSS REFERENCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Item number and heading Location in prospectus
----------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
Part A
------
Item 1. Outside Front Cover Outside Front Cover Page
Item 2. Inside Front and Outside Back Cover Page Inside Front and Outside Back Cover Page
Item 3. Fee Table and Synopsis Fee Table; Prospectus Summary
Item 4. Financial Highlights Financial Highlights
Item 5. Plan of Distribution Underwriting
Item 6. Selling Shareholders Not applicable
Item 7. Use of Proceeds Use of Proceeds
Item 8. General Description of the Registrant Prospectus Summary; Risk Factors; Business
Item 9. Management Management
Item 10. Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Description of Securities
Securities
Item 11. Defaults and Arrears on Senior Securities Not applicable
Item 12. Legal Proceedings Investment Objectives and Policies -- Legal
Proceedings
Item 13. Table of Contents of the Statement of Not applicable
Additional Information
Part B
------
Item 14. Cover Page Not applicable
Item 15. Table of Contents Not applicable
Item 16. General Information and History Business -- General Information and History
Item 17. Investment Objectives and Policies Investment Objectives and Policies
Item 18. Management Management
Item 19. Control Persons and Principal Holders of Control Persons and Principal Holders of
Securities Securities
Item 20. Investment Advisory and Other Services Investment Advisory and Other Services
Item 21. Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices
Item 22. Tax Status Income Tax Matters
Item 23. Financial Statements
</TABLE>
Pursuant to General Instruction on Form N-2, all information required to
be set forth in Part B: Statement of Additional Information has been included
in Part A: The Prospectus. All items required to be set forth in Part C are set
forth in Part C.
<PAGE>
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer
to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 2, 2000
1,000,000 Shares
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
UTEK CORPORATION
Common Stock
------------
UTEK Corporation is offering 1,000,000 shares of its common stock at $6.00
per share. This is our initial public offering and there currently is no public
market for our common stock.
We are an internally managed closed-end management investment company that
operates as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of
1940. Our primary investment objective is to increase our net assets by
exchanging stock in our portfolio companies for cash and other assets we will
use to acquire licenses to additional technologies. We seek to achieve our
investment objective by developing our portfolio companies that identify,
license and market new technologies invented primarily by employees of
universities and laboratories.
On closing of this offering, investors will experience immediate and
substantial dilution of $3.74 or 62% per share. Shares of closed-end investment
companies, like our company, have a tendency to trade at a discount from their
net asset value. The initial public offering price is $6.00 per share, which
was determined based upon negotiations with the representative of the
underwriters. Our common stock will be listed on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market
under the symbol UTOB.
Investing in our common stock involves risks including, but not limited
to, those associated with our portfolio companies, which are development stage
companies with little or no operating histories. See "Risk Factors" beginning
on page 6.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sales Load
------------------------------------
Underwriting
Price to Discounts and Non-Accountable Proceeds to
Public Commissions Expense Allowance UTEK
-------------- --------------- ------------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Per Share ......... $ 6.00 $ 0.60 $ 0.18 $ 5.22
Total ............. $6,000,000 $600,000 $180,000 $5,220,000
</TABLE>
We have entered into a three-year financial consulting agreement with the
representative of the underwriters for a total fee of $110,000 payable on
closing of this offering. We have granted the underwriters a 45-day option to
purchase up to an additional 150,000 shares of common stock to cover
over-allotments. The underwriters are offering the shares on a firm commitment
basis.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this
prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or about October
__, 2000.
Schneider Securities, Inc.
The date of this prospectus is , 2000.
<PAGE>
---------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page Page
----- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Available Information ............................... ii Portfolio Transactions .............................. 33
Reports to Stockholders ............................. ii Regulation .......................................... 33
Fee Table ........................................... iii Management .......................................... 35
Prospectus Summary .................................. 1 Control Persons and Principal Holders of
Risk Factors ........................................ 6 Securities ....................................... 39
Dilution ............................................ 14 Conflicts of Interest ............................... 40
Dividends and Future Distributions .................. 15 Investment Advisory Services ........................ 40
Capitalization ...................................... 15 Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices ............ 40
Use of Proceeds ..................................... 16 Income Tax Matters .................................. 41
Selected Financial Data ............................. 17 Description of Securities ........................... 41
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Underwriting ........................................ 43
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 18 Legal Matters ....................................... 45
Business ............................................ 22 Experts ............................................. 45
Investment Objectives and Policies .................. 22 Custodian ........................................... 45
Determination of Net Asset Value .................... 32 Index to Consolidated Financial Statements .......... F-1
</TABLE>
You should rely only on the information contained in this document or to
that which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you
with information that is different. This document may only be used where it is
legal to sell these securities. The information in this document may only be
accurate on the date of this document.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We have filed a Registration Statement on Form N-2 regarding this offering
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This prospectus, which is a part
of the registration statement, sets forth concisely the information about our
company that a prospective investor should know before investing, and this
prospectus should be read and retained for future reference. This prospectus
does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement,
and you should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits to read
that information. References in this prospectus to any of our contracts or
other documents are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the
exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual
contract or document. You may read and copy the registration statement, the
related exhibits and the other materials we file with the Commission at the
Commission's public reference room at 450 Fifth Street N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549 and at the Commission's regional offices at 500 West Madison Street,
Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661 and 7 World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New
York, New York 10048. You can also request copies of those documents, upon
payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the Commission. Please call the
Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the
public reference rooms and regional offices. The Commission also maintains an
Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other
information regarding companies that file documents electronically with the
Commission, including information about us following this offering. The SEC's
website address is www.sec.gov. Our website address is www.utekcorp.com. Our
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
As a result of this offering, we will be subject to the informational
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act. So long as we are subject to the
periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, we will furnish reports
and other information required thereby to the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports
containing, among other information, audited financial statements certified by
an independent accounting firm and quarterly reports containing unaudited
financial statements. We also intend to file such other reports as we may
determine or as may be required by law.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may over-allot or
effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market price of our common
stock offered hereby at levels above that which might otherwise prevail in the
open market. Such stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
ii
<PAGE>
FEE TABLE
Stockholder Transaction Expenses
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
Underwriting discounts and commissions ......... 10.0%
Non-accountable expense allowance .............. 3.0%
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets)
Other expenses
Salaries and wages ............................. 3.3%
Professional fees .............................. 3.4%
Sales and marketing ............................ 2.4%
Management fees ................................ 0.7%
General and administrative ..................... 3.4%
----
Total annual expenses ................................ 13.2%
====
The non-accountable expense allowance is equal to three percent (3%) of the
aggregate gross proceeds from the offering and is payable to Schneider
Securities, Inc., as representative of the underwriters.
Other expenses are based upon estimated amounts for the current fiscal year, as
a percentage of net assets, including estimated net proceeds from the offering.
For additional information on management compensation, please refer to the
discussion of our stock option plans beginning on page 38.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 1 year 3 years 5 years 10 years
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
You will pay the following expenses on a $1,000
investment after the following periods, assuming a
5% annual return ................................. $251 $461 $635 $953
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The purpose of the above table is to assist investors in understanding the
various costs and expenses that an investor in our company will bear directly
or indirectly.
The foregoing should not be considered a representation of past or future
expenses or rates of return. The actual expenses and rates of return may be
greater or lesser than those shown in the example.
iii
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus. It may
not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand this
offering fully, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the
risk factors and the financial statements. Unless we tell you otherwise, the
information in this prospectus assumes that the underwriters will not exercise
their over-allotment option.
UTEK Corporation
General
We are a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that
has elected to be treated as a special type of investment company known as a
business development company, or BDC. Our primary investment objective is to
increase our net assets by exchanging stock in our portfolio companies for cash
and other assets we will use to acquire licenses to additional technologies. We
intend to achieve this objective through our U2B(SM) investment model which
consists of:
o making controlling investments in and forming development stage
companies, which we refer to as portfolio companies;
o developing our portfolio companies through the acquisition of new
technologies and, when appropriate, the funding of further research and
development;
o realizing value primarily through the sale of our portfolio companies to
companies in related industries in non-taxable transactions in which we
receive common stock of the acquiring company; and
o selling the common stock we receive in exchange for our portfolio
companies and investing the proceeds of sale in licensing additional
portfolio technologies for our portfolio companies.
Investment Strategy
We form and make investments in our portfolio companies for the purpose of
assisting the portfolio companies in obtaining licenses to new technologies
developed at universities and research laboratories in a variety of industries,
including e-commerce, nanotechnology, computer sciences, environmental
engineering and healthcare. We also seek acquisition partners that will
purchase our portfolio companies including their technology rights, primarily
in stock for stock exchanges. We may also make additional investments in
portfolio companies and their acquirors to fund continued research and
development of the acquired technologies.
We also provide our portfolio companies with significant managerial
assistance including having members of our management team serve as directors
and executive officers of our portfolio companies. Our management has
experience identifying and acquiring licensing rights to technologies developed
at universities and research laboratories and selling those rights to other
entities for commercialization, a process referred to as technology transfer.
We also provide assistance to portfolio companies in connection with setting up
and funding sponsored research programs for the development of new
technologies. Our portfolio companies are formed with the objective of
completing a technology transfer. Our U2B(SM) investment model is designed to
bring technologies from their inception at universities to the private sector;
hence, we engage in university-to-business technology transfer.
As of the date of this prospectus we have controlling interests in the
following portfolio companies:
o Technology Development, Inc., which is seeking to acquire new computer
hardware and software technologies;
1
<PAGE>
o Advanced Desalination Technologies, Inc., which is seeking to acquire a
water desalination technology;
o Doppler Tomography International, Inc., which is seeking to acquire new
technologies for non-invasive analysis of body tissue;
o Microsphere Technology, Inc., which is seeking to acquire licenses to
novel materials science technologies;
o XGR Imaging, Inc., which is seeking to acquire new imaging technologies;
o Advanced Measurement Systems, Inc., which is currently seeking to acquire
licenses to new surface measurement technologies;
o Advanced Surface Measurement, Inc., which is currently seeking to acquire
licenses to new surface analysis technologies;
o Voice Tech Worldwide, Inc., which has acquired a license to a proprietary
process technology that acts as a voice-mail to e-mail agent providing
access to multiple heterogeneous voice-mail systems; and
o Universal Keypad, Inc., which has acquired a license to a proprietary
technology that acts to enhance the ease-of-use of keypads.
When we identify a new technology that we believe has commercial
potential, it is our practice to have a portfolio company enter into an
agreement with the developers to license the technology. We intend that
substantially all research and marketing will be conducted by our portfolio
companies. However, we do not intend to have a portfolio company invest
substantial sums in a new technology or a licensing arrangement until such time
as we or the portfolio company has identified a suitable purchaser and we have
entered into an agreement to sell the portfolio company to the purchaser. These
sales are structured such that we exchange all the shares we own in the
portfolio company for common stock or other securities of the purchaser in a
tax-free exchange. Sales of our portfolio companies to date are as follows:
o In May 1998, we received 1,000,000 shares of common stock of Lexon, Inc.
in connection with the sale of Gentest, Inc. a portfolio company, to
Lexon. Lexon is a development stage public company whose shares are traded
on the over-the-counter bulletin board under the symbol LXXN.
o In June 1999, we received 791,957 shares of common stock of NuElectric,
Inc. in connection with the sale of our portfolio company, Clean Water
Technologies, Inc. to NuElectric. On November 12, 1999, we exchanged
300,000 shares of our NuElectric common stock for common stock in another
company. In September 2000, we received 546,000 shares of NuElectric common
stock in connection with the sale of our portfolio company Zorak, Inc. to
NuElectric. We own a total of 1,037,957 shares of NuElectric common stock.
NuElectric is a development stage public company whose shares are traded
on the over-the-counter bulletin board under the symbol NRGE.
o In May 1999, we received 900,000 shares of common stock of Centrex, Inc.
in connection with the sale of our portfolio company, E. Coli Measurement
Systems, Inc., to Centrex. In September 1999, we received 684,000 shares
of common stock of Centrex in connection with the sale of another
portfolio company, Safe Water Technologies, Inc., to Centrex. Centrex is a
development stage private company and we own 1,584,000 shares of Centrex
common stock.
o In January 1999, we received 879,300 shares of common stock of Image
Analysis, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation in connection with the sale of our
portfolio company, Image Analysis Corporation, to Image Analysis, Inc.
Image Analysis, Inc. is a development stage private company and we own
879,300 shares of common stock of Image Analysis, Inc.
2
<PAGE>
o In May 1999, we received 900,000 of common stock of Nucor Enterprises,
Inc., an Oklahoma corporation on the sale of our portfolio company,
Advanced Reinforcing Technologies, Inc. to Nucor. Nucor is a development
stage private company and we own 900,000 shares of common stock of Nucor.
o In January 2000, we received $50,000 cash and a promissory note for
$150,000 on the sale of our portfolio company, Cancer Diagnostics, Inc.,
to Lexon, Inc.
o In March 2000, we received 100,799 shares of common stock of Graphco
Technologies, Inc., on the sale of our portfolio company, Digital
Personnel, Inc., to Graphco-DPI Holding Company, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Graphco Technologies, Inc. Graphco Technologies, Inc. is a
private company.
o In June 2000, we received 931,000 shares of common stock of The Quantum
Group, Inc., on the sale of our portfolio company Advanced Recycling
Sciences, Inc. to The Quantum Group, Inc. The Quantum Group, Inc. is a
development stage public company with shares traded on the OTC Bulletin
Board under the symbol QTMG.
Our objective is to hold the securities that we receive in exchange for
our portfolio companies until such time that we can sell the securities for
cash or other assets. The proceeds of these sales are to be used primarily to
acquire additional rights in technologies for our portfolio companies.
We also provide consulting services relating to technology transfer to
university research departments and to public and private companies.
UTEK Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware
in July 1999. Our principal executive offices are located at 202 South Wheeler
Street, Plant City, Florida 33566, and our telephone number is (813) 754-4330.
Our website is located at www.utekcorp.com.
Management Fees and Compensation
Clifford M. Gross, our Chairman, will receive a salary of $150,000 per
year. Our President, Uwe Reischl, will receive a salary of $100,000 per year.
In addition, we granted stock options and paid other compensation to certain of
our officers for their management assistance to portfolio companies. See
"Management -- Executive Compensation."
3
<PAGE>
The Offering
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Common stock offered ...................... 1,000,000 shares.
Public offering price ..................... $6.00 per share.
Common stock to be outstanding after this
offering ................................ 3,782,226 shares. This does not include 100,000 shares
reserved for issuance to the representative of the
underwriters.
Risk factors .............................. Investing in our common stock involves a high degree
of risk including, but not limited to, the highly
speculative nature of our investments in our portfolio
companies and the illiquidity and lack of
diversification of our investments.
Use of Proceeds ........................... We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for:
o investments in portfolio companies and additional
investments for research and development of
licensed technologies; and
o general corporate purposes, including working
capital.
The Nasdaq SmallCap Market symbol ......... UTOB
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE>
Financial Highlights
The following table sets forth per share income, capital changes and
certain other operating information for us. The financial and other data has
been derived from our audited financial statements for the years ended December
31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 and the unaudited financial statements for the six
months ended June 30, 1999 and 2000, all of which are included in another
section of this prospectus. The information below should be read in conjunction
with "Selected Financial Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial
statements and their footnotes, each of which is included in another section of
this prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PER SHARE INFORMATION
Net asset value, beginning of period $ -- $ 0.02 $ 0.56 $ 0.56 $ 1.18
Net increase from operations (1) ..... -- 0.05 0.10 0.23 0.22
Net change in unrealized
appreciation on investments
(after taxes) (1) ................... -- 0.23 (0.04) 0.13 0.05
Net increase from stock
transactions (1) .................... 0.02 0.26 0.56 0.56 --
--------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------
Net asset value, end of period ......... $ 0.02 $ 0.56 $ 1.18 $ 1.48 $ 1.45
========= ========= ========== ========= ==========
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Net assets, end of period .............. $ 31,708 $1,365,647 $3,284,453 $4,104,821 $4,041,860
Ratio of expenses to average net
assets (2) ........................... 32% 31% 31% 15% 26%
Ratio of net income to average net
assets (2) ........................... (32%) 15% 12% 23% 17%
Portfolio turnover rate ................ -- -- 7% -- --
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period ........ 2,070,494 2,304,691 2,682,420 2,682,420 2,782,226
</TABLE>
-------------
(1) Calculated based on weighted average number of shares outstanding during
the period.
(2) Excluding income taxes.
5
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock is speculative and involves a high
degree of risk. In addition to the other information in this prospectus, you
should carefully consider the following risk factors before making an
investment decision.
Our investment model is speculative in nature and our history of investments
using the model is limited.
Our investment model is highly speculative since it involves making
investments in new development stage companies and having those companies
invest in new, untested technology. Furthermore, we have only been using our
investment model for a relatively short period of time and have little or no
historical information upon which to judge whether or not the model is
successful. We cannot assure you that our investment model or any of our
investments will be successful.
Our portfolio companies are development stage companies dependent upon the
successful commercialization of new technologies. Each of our investments in
portfolio companies is subject to a high degree of risk and we may lose all of
our investment in a portfolio company if it is not successful.
We invest in development stage companies that our management believes can
benefit from our expertise in technology transfer. Development stage companies
are subject to all of the risks associated with new businesses. In addition,
our portfolio companies are also subject to the risks associated with research
and development of new technologies. These include the risks that new
technologies may:
o not be identified, developed or commercialized,
o not function, or
o become obsolete.
Our portfolio companies must successfully acquire licenses to new
technologies, and in some cases further develop new technologies, and then
complete a merger transaction for our investments to be successful. Two of our
portfolio companies have acquired technology licenses which will revert back to
their university licensors if those companies are not sold by approximately the
end of October 2000. We cannot assure you that any of our investments in our
portfolio companies will be successful. Our portfolio companies will be
competing with larger, established companies, with greater access to, and
resources for, further development of these new technologies. In addition, for
an investment to be successful, our portfolio companies often must develop the
technology and identify buyers who are willing to acquire the technology, in
exchange for stock or other consideration. We cannot assure you that any of our
portfolio companies will be successful or that we will successfully sell our
portfolio companies or sell or relicense the technology rights held by our
portfolio companies. We may lose our entire investment in any or all of our
portfolio companies.
Our portfolio companies depend upon the research and development activities of
universities and laboratories, over which neither we nor our portfolio
companies have any control.
Our portfolio companies depend upon the research activities of
universities and government research facilities. Neither we, nor our portfolio
companies, have any control over the research activities of universities and
research laboratories. In addition, we have no control over what types of
research are presented to us by universities and government research facilities
for evaluation and commercial development. Further, the licenses to
technologies that our portfolio companies obtain may be non-exclusive. In the
event that we make an investment in a portfolio company, and we are unable to
locate a new technology to be acquired by the portfolio company, we could lose
our entire investment.
Technologies acquired by our portfolio companies may become obsolete before we
can sell the portfolio companies.
Neither we nor our portfolio companies have any control over the pace of
technology development. There is a significant risk that a portfolio company
could acquire the rights to a technology that is currently or is subsequently
made obsolete by other technological developments. We cannot assure you that
any of our portfolio companies will successfully acquire, develop and transfer
any new technology.
6
<PAGE>
The patents on the technologies that our portfolio companies license may
infringe upon the rights of others and patent applications that universities or
laboratories have filed may not be granted.
Many of our portfolio companies rely upon patents to protect the
technologies that they license. If the patents on technologies that they
license are found to infringe upon the rights of others, or are held to be
invalid, then the licenses to such technologies will have little or no value to
our portfolio companies. In addition, if a patent licensed by a portfolio
company is found to infringe upon the rights of others, the portfolio company
may be liable for monetary damages. Our portfolio companies are dependent upon
universities or government research facilities to file, secure and protect
patents on licensed technologies. In the event that a patent is challenged or
violated, our portfolio companies may not have the financial resources to
defend the patent either in the preliminary stages of litigation or in court.
In addition, if our portfolio companies acquire licenses to technologies with
patents pending, we cannot assure you that such patents will be granted.
Technologies that have been developed with funding from the United States
government may have limits on their use which could affect the value of the
technology to a portfolio company.
Technologies developed with funds provided by the United States government
have restrictions regarding where they may be sold and have limits on
exclusivity. A portfolio company that acquires a technology developed with
federal funding may be limited as to where it can sell the technology. The
technology may only be allowed to be sold or manufactured within the United
States. In addition, under Section 23 of the United States Code, the government
has the right to use technologies that it has funded regardless of whether the
technology has been licensed to a third party. Such regulations may limit the
marketability, and therefore reduce the value of, the technology to our
portfolio companies.
We may need to make additional investments in our portfolio companies to
provide them with capital to further develop licensed technologies.
We may have to make additional investments in portfolio companies to
protect our initial investments. We retain the discretion to make any
additional investments as our management determines. The failure to make such
additional investments may jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio
company and our initial (and subsequent) investments. Moreover, additional
investments may limit the number of companies in which we can make initial
investments. We have no established criteria in determining whether to make an
additional investment except that our management will exercise its business
judgment and apply criteria similar to those used when making the initial
investment. We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds to make any
necessary additional investments. This could adversely affect our success and
result in the loss of a substantial portion or all of our investment in a
portfolio company.
We may be unable or decide not to make additional investments in our portfolio
companies which could result in our losing our initial investment if the
portfolio company fails. Our ownership and control may be diluted if a
portfolio company obtains additional funds from third party investors.
Our agreement with the underwriters restricts the size of our investment
in any single portfolio company and, as a result, could prohibit an additional
investment in a portfolio company in the event that our initial investment
represented 10% or more of our assets. Even if we are able to make an
additional investment in a portfolio company within the prescribed limits, we
may elect not to make an additional investment in a portfolio company in order
to limit the size of our investment which is at risk. It is also our policy not
to make loans to our portfolio companies which in the aggregate exceed 25% of
our net assets. Therefore, if a portfolio company requires additional funds to
continue operating, and we cannot or choose not to make an additional
investment, our investment in the portfolio company may decline in value. In
addition, to the extent that a portfolio company seeks additional financing
from third parties, our ownership interest and control of the portfolio company
may be diluted.
The securities we hold in our portfolio companies are illiquid and we may not
be able to sell the portfolio company securities we hold for amounts equal to
their recorded value, if at all.
Our portfolio companies are all private entities and we acquire securities
in each portfolio company in a private transaction. As a result, all of the
securities we hold in our portfolio companies are restricted securities, as
defined under the Securities Act and are subject to restrictions on resale.
Furthermore, we do not anticipate that a public market will exist for any of
the securities we hold in our portfolio companies.
7
<PAGE>
Therefore, any sale or other transfer of the securities we hold in portfolio
companies will be made in private transactions and we cannot assure you that we
will be able to sell our portfolio company securities for amounts equal to the
values that we have ascribed to them.
We are dependent on merger transactions, structured as tax-free exchanges to
sell our portfolio companies. A change in the Internal Revenue Code affecting
tax-free exchanges could reduce or eliminate our ability to sell portfolio
companies.
We do not anticipate selling any of our portfolio companies, except in
connection with merger transactions. We anticipate that most, if not all, of
such merger transactions will be structured as tax free exchanges under Section
368 of the Internal Revenue Code. If Section 368 were to be amended so that we
were no longer able to structure our merger transactions as tax free exchanges,
we may not be able to sell our portfolio companies on acceptable terms. If we
are unable to successfully sell a portfolio company in a merger transaction, we
may lose our investment.
We have been dependent on a small number of companies controlled by the same
investor group for the purchase of our portfolio companies. We have only
limited experience selling our portfolio companies and of the ten transactions
that we have completed, six have been with companies controlled by the same
group of investors.
As of the date of this prospectus we have completed only ten transactions,
including nine mergers and one stock sale, involving the sale of portfolio
companies to other companies. Six of these sales have been made to companies
that were then controlled by substantially the same investors. As a result, we
have only had the benefit and experience of negotiating such agreements with a
small number of purchasers. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
successfully negotiate merger transactions for sales of our portfolio companies
in the future.
The agreements we have with universities do not guarantee that the universities
will grant licenses to our portfolio companies.
The agreements that we have entered into with universities provide us with
the ability to evaluate the commercial potential for technologies at an early
stage of development. However, these agreements do not provide us with any
guarantee that following our evaluation, a university will grant us a license.
As a result, we may expend time and resources evaluating a technology and not
be able to secure a license to such technology for one of our portfolio
companies.
We are exposed to significant asset concentration risk.
To date, six out of the ten consummated transactions have been with "merger
parties" controlled by substantially the same investors. The value of these
investments represented approximately 65% of our total net assets as of December
31, 1999 and approximately 57% of our total net assets as of June 30, 2000.
We are dependent upon our management's ability to identify acquirors for our
portfolio companies.
Our investment strategy is based upon selling our portfolio companies
primarily to small or development stage public companies that wish to acquire
the technologies owned by our portfolio companies. We do not expect to sell any
portfolio company securities to the public. If we fail to identify an acquiror
for a portfolio company, we do not expect to sell that portfolio company's
securities to the public. Therefore, our entire investment in the portfolio
company could be lost.
We are dependent upon and have little or no control over the efforts of
companies that acquire our portfolio companies to successfully commercialize
the acquired technologies.
When we sell a portfolio company, we receive common stock from the
acquiring company based upon the mutually agreed upon values of the portfolio
company, its licensed technology and the acquiring company. We then intend to
sell the securities that we acquire in exchange for our portfolio companies at
some time in
8
<PAGE>
the future. Therefore, our ability to profit from an investment in a portfolio
company is ultimately dependent upon the price we receive for the shares of the
acquiring company. In most cases, the companies that acquire our portfolio
companies must successfully commercialize the technologies they acquire. We do
not have control over the companies that acquire our portfolio companies and we
do not intend to provide them with managerial assistance. These operating
companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies
with:
o greater financial resources,
o more extensive research and development experience,
o greater manufacturing, marketing and service capabilities, and
o a greater number of qualified and experienced managerial and technical
personnel.
The operating companies may face additional risks of product and
technological obsolescence and government regulation over which we will have
little or no control. They may need additional financing which they are unable
to secure and we are unable or unwilling to provide or they may be subject to
adverse developments unrelated to the technologies they acquire. We cannot
assure you that any of the companies that acquire our portfolio companies will
be successful or that we will be able to sell the securities we receive at a
profit or for sufficient amounts to even recover our investment in the
portfolio company.
The companies that have merged with our portfolio companies to date are
development stage companies and, as a result, the value of the securities that
we receive in such merger transactions are subject to significant fluctuations.
Historically we have merged, and we intend to continue to merge, our
portfolio companies with companies in related fields that are development stage
companies. As a result, the securities that we receive when we merge a
portfolio company are subject to all of the risks associated with securities of
development stage companies. The values of these securities may be subject to
significant fluctuations. We cannot assure you that when we sell these
securities, we will receive the value ascribed to the securities either at the
time of acquisition or during subsequent valuation periods.
Our investments in our portfolio companies may be concentrated in one or more
industries and if these industries should decline or fail to develop as
expected our investments will be lost.
Our investments in our portfolio companies may be concentrated in one or
more industries. This concentration will mean that our investments will be
particularly dependent on the development and performance of those industries.
Accordingly, our investments may not benefit from any advantages which might be
obtained with greater diversification of the industries in which our portfolio
companies operate. If those industries should decline or fail to develop as
expected, our investments in our portfolio companies in those industries will
be subject to loss.
Our investments in our portfolio companies are not made on a multi-tiered basis
and are subject to loss.
Substantially all of our portfolio companies are early stage companies. We
may make substantial investments in our portfolio companies to enable them to
conduct initial research, development and acquisition activities. These
investments are not made in companies at different stages of development and,
accordingly, our investments do not benefit from any advantages which might be
obtained by making investments on a multi-tiered basis. We cannot assure you
that any or all of our portfolio companies will find or acquire new
technologies. If any or all of them do find or acquire new technologies, we
cannot assure you that the portfolio companies will find suitable merger
partners or purchasers of the technologies. As a result, any or all of our
portfolio companies may use the proceeds of our investments to pay
unrecoverable costs and expenses of researching, developing or acquiring
technologies.
We generally receive equity securities of the companies that acquire our
portfolio companies, rather than cash. We record revenues from these
transactions; however, the securities that we receive will be subject to
restrictions on resale which will limit our ability to sell these securities
and attain liquidity.
To date, we have received equity securities for most of the portfolio
companies we have sold. We recorded operating income from these transactions.
However, all of the securities we received in exchange for
9
<PAGE>
our portfolio companies are "restricted," as such term is defined under Rule
144. These securities are restricted because they were issued in private
transactions not involving a public offering and may not be sold in the absence
of registration other than under Rule 144 or another exemption from
registration. As a result of such restrictions, our ability to sell or
otherwise transfer the securities we hold in order to generate cash will be
limited. We cannot assure you that we will be able to receive the recorded
value of our portfolio company securities in merger transactions.
We may not be able to merge our portfolio companies with publicly traded
entities and may receive non-publicly traded securities in exchange for our
portfolio companies. We may be required to sell the securities we receive at a
substantial discount to their appraised value if no public market exists.
To date, we have completed ten sales of portfolio companies. Of these
sales, four have been to public companies, and the remainder have been to
non-public companies. We are substantially dependent upon the ability of
non-public acquirors of our portfolio companies to implement a plan which would
facilitate a trading market for their securities or other strategy which would
allow for the potential sale of our ownership interest. In addition, to the
extent that we own more than 10% of an acquiror's shares, we may be deemed to
be an affiliate of the acquiror which would limit our ability to dispose of
securities we receive for our portfolio companies. Our sales of the securities
we receive for our portfolio companies may be limited by, and subject to, the
lack of or limited nature of a trading market for the securities and the
volatility of the stock market as a whole. Such limitations could prevent or
delay any sale of these securities or significantly reduce the amount of
proceeds, if any, that we might realize.
The values we place on our investments may not accurately reflect their future
value or the value that we will receive for them when we sell them.
At June 30, 2000, December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively,
equity securities amounting to $4,542,896 or 112% of net assets, $2,594,931 or
79% of net assets and $1,300,000 or 95% of net assets, have been valued at fair
value as determined by the board of directors in consultation with an
independent valuation specialist. As a general matter, restricted securities and
securities without an active trading market are more difficult to accurately
value than unrestricted, actively traded securities of public companies. We are
required by the 1940 Act to determine the value of our illiquid securities on a
quarterly basis and make a good faith determination of the fair value of the
investments. See "Determination of Net Asset Value" and our financial
statements. Generally, such investments are valued on a "going concern" basis
without giving effect to any disposition costs. If we were required to sell any
of such investments, there is no assurance that the fair value, as determined by
management, would be obtained. If we were unable to obtain fair value for such
investments, there would be an adverse effect on our net asset value and on the
price of our common stock.
One of the companies that we own shares in is involved in an investigation by
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We have received a subpoena from the SEC's Division of Enforcement in
connection with an investigation that involves Lexon, Inc. We own 924,973
shares of Lexon. We have received no further information regarding the nature
of this investigation. As a result we cannot presently assess the materiality
or significance of any potential legal proceedings, liabilities of Lexon or
other risks or uncertainties, including any adverse effect on the trading price
of Lexon common stock.
The book value of the shares of common stock purchased in this offering will be
immediately and substantially diluted.
The public offering price at which our common stock is sold in this
offering is significantly higher than the net asset value per share of our
common stock. Each share will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$3.74 or 62% from the offering price.
Your ownership interest and the value of the shares of our common stock
purchased in this offering may be diluted by the exercise of stock options and
warrants we have granted or may grant in the future.
We have adopted employee stock option plans under which certain of our
employees and directors have been granted options to purchase up to 378,000
shares of our common stock. We have also reserved an
10
<PAGE>
additional 372,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under our employee
stock option plans to key employees and directors. In addition, we will issue
warrants to the representative of the underwriters to purchase shares of common
stock equal to ten percent of the shares sold in this offering at an exercise
price of $9.90 per share. The issuance and sale of these shares of common stock
will dilute the ownership interest of investors in this offering and may have
an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
If our underwriters do not act as market makers for our common stock, you may
have more difficulty selling your shares.
The underwriters of this offering may act as market makers for our common
stock. However, the underwriters are not obligated to act as market makers. If
our underwriters do not act as market makers for our common stock you may have
more difficulty selling your shares. In addition, our shares may experience
greater fluctuations in price. Our shares may also be thinly traded and a low
amount of trading may significantly adversely affect the price of our shares.
The representative of the underwriters has advised us of its intention to make
a market in our common stock.
We depend upon Clifford M. Gross and Uwe Reischl for our investment decisions
in portfolio companies.
We rely, and will continue to be substantially dependent upon, the
continued services of our management, principally our Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board, Clifford M. Gross, and our President, Uwe Reischl.
Our management is responsible for the review of potential investments by and
the provision of advice to our portfolio companies regarding the acquisition of
technologies and additional research and development. We also depend upon our
management's key contacts with universities, to maintain our access to new
technologies, and their relationships with companies in the private sector in
order to effectuate the sale of our portfolio companies.
Any transactions we engage in with affiliates may involve conflicts of
interest.
The 1940 Act restricts transactions between us and any of our affiliates,
including our officers, directors, employees and principal stockholders. In
many cases, the 1940 Act prohibits transactions between such persons and
ourselves unless we first apply for and obtain an exemptive order from the SEC.
Delays and costs in obtaining necessary approvals may decrease or even
eliminate any profitability of such transactions or make it impracticable or
impossible to consummate such transactions. These affiliations could cause
circumstances which would require the SEC's approval in advance of proposed
transactions by us in portfolio companies.
Further, depending upon the extent of our management's influence and
control with respect to such portfolio companies, the selection of the
affiliates of management to perform such services may not be a disinterested
decision, and the terms and conditions for the performance of such services and
the amount and terms of such compensation may not be determined in arm's-length
negotiations.
We have a limited amount of funds available for investment in portfolio
companies and as a result, our investments will lack diversification.
Based on the amount of our existing available funds, together with the
funds from this offering, it is unlikely that we will be able to commit our
funds to investments in, and the acquisition of, securities of a large number
of companies. We intend to continue to operate as a non-diversified investment
company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Prospective investors should
understand that our current investments are not, and in the future may not be,
substantially diversified. We may not achieve the same level of diversification
as larger entities engaged in similar venture capital activities. Therefore,
our assets may be subject to greater risk of loss than if they were more widely
diversified. The loss of one or more of our limited number of investments could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
11
<PAGE>
We are subject to government regulations because of our status as a business
development company.
We have elected to be treated as a BDC under the Small Business Investment
Incentive Act of 1980, which modified the 1940 Act. Although the Incentive Act
relieves BDCs from compliance with many of the provisions of the 1940 Act, the
Incentive Act imposes on BDCs greater restrictions on permitted types of
investments. Moreover, the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act impose
numerous restrictions on our activities, including restrictions on the nature
of our investments and transactions with affiliates. We cannot assure you that
this legislation will be interpreted or administratively implemented in a
manner consistent with our objectives and manner of operations. Upon approval
of a majority of our stockholders, we may elect to withdraw our status as a
BDC. If we elect to withdraw our election, or if our election to operate as a
BDC is rejected, or if we otherwise fail to qualify as a BDC, we may be subject
to the substantially greater regulation under the 1940 Act. Compliance with
such regulations would significantly increase our costs of doing business.
We have a limited operating history upon which you can assess our prospects and
we are subject to the risks associated with any new business.
As a result of our short history of operations, we have only consummated
transactions with a very small number of companies. Therefore, there is little
historical information regarding our operations upon which you can base your
investment decision. In addition, we are subject to all of the business risks
and uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise. We cannot assure
you that our investment objective will be attained.
Our management has limited experience operating a business, has had no
experience in managing and operating a business development company, and has
little or no experience in corporate finance and corporate mergers.
The members of our management team have been engaged in the operation of
our business for a short period of time and so have limited experience. Some of
our directors and executive officers only have experience in science and
research. Furthermore, we commenced operations as a business development
company in October 1999 and so our directors and executive officers have only
had experience operating a business development company since October 1999. In
addition, our management has had limited experience in the areas of corporate
finance and corporate mergers.
Our management has broad discretion in investing the proceeds of this offering.
Except as set forth in "Use of Proceeds" and subject to our fundamental
policies, our management has broad discretion in the application of the
proceeds of this offering. We have not identified any particular use for the
net proceeds of this offering other than to make investments on the basis of
opportunities as they may arise. Accordingly, purchasers of our securities must
rely on the ability of management in making portfolio investments consistent
with our objectives. Investors will not have the opportunity to evaluate
personally the relevant economic, financial and other information which will be
utilized by management in deciding whether or not to make a particular
investment.
There are no significant barriers to entry to our business and we expect to
face significant competition as new competitors enter the market.
We expect that if our investment model proves to be successful, our
current competitors in the technology transfer market may duplicate our
strategy and new competitors may enter the market. We compete against other
technology transfer companies, some of which are much larger and have
significantly greater financial resources than we do. In addition, these
companies will be competing with our portfolio companies to acquire
technologies from universities and government research laboratories. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to successfully compete against these
competitors in the acquisition of technology licenses, funding of technology
development or marketing of portfolio companies.
12
<PAGE>
One of our current stockholders has significant influence over our management
and affairs and will continue to have significant control over us after the
completion of this offering.
Clifford M. Gross, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board,
beneficially owns approximately 70% of our common stock and upon completion of
this offering will beneficially own approximately 51% of our common stock. As a
result, following the completion of this offering, Dr. Gross will be able,
among other things, to elect directors, change our investment policies, and
withdraw our election to operate as a BDC.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information included in this prospectus may contain forward-looking
statements. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future
plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the
words "may," "will," "should," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe,"
"intend" or "project" or the negative of these words or other variations on
these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are
based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and we cannot assure you that these
projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. Our
actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risk
factors described above.
13
<PAGE>
DILUTION
The public offering price at which our common stock is sold in this
offering is significantly and substantially higher than the net asset value per
share of our common stock. At June 30, 2000, we had a net asset value of
$4,041,860 or $1.45 per share. After giving effect to the sale of 1,000,000
shares of common stock being offered, and after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and expenses of this offering of $1,484,000, our
adjusted net asset value at June 30, 2000 would have been $8,557,860 or $2.26
per share, representing an immediate increase in net asset value of $.81 per
share to the existing stockholders and an immediate, significant and
substantial dilution of $3.74 or 62% per share to new investors. Please also
refer to the Fee Table on page iii.
The following table illustrates the above information with respect to
dilution to new investors on a per share basis at June 30, 2000:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Initial public offering price per share of common stock ......... $ 6.00
Net asset value per share before the offering ................... $ 1.45
Increase attributable to new investors .......................... 0.81
-------
Adjusted net asset value per share after the offering ........... 2.26
-------
Dilution to new investors ....................................... $ 3.74
=======
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth, with respect to existing stockholders and
the investors in the offering, a comparison of the number of shares of common
stock purchased from our company, the percentage ownership of such shares, the
aggregate consideration paid, the percentage of total consideration paid and
the average price paid per share.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Owned Total Consideration Average
----------------------- ------------------------- Price per
Number Percent Amount Percent Share
----------- --------- ------------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Existing stockholders .............. 2,782,226 73.6% $2,163,832 26.5% $ 0.78
Investors in this offering ......... 1,000,000 26.4% $6,000,000 73.5% $ 6.00
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE>
DIVIDENDS AND FUTURE DISTRIBUTIONS
We have never declared or paid any dividends to the holders of our common
stock and we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to retain all earnings for use in connection with the
expansion of our business and for general corporate purposes. Our board of
directors will have sole discretion in determining whether to declare and pay
dividends in the future. The declaration of dividends will depend on our
profitability, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects and
other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Our ability to pay
dividends in the future could be limited or prohibited by regulatory
requirements and the terms of financing agreements that we may enter into or by
the terms of any preferred stock that we may authorize and issue.
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 1998,
December 31, 1999 and June 30, 2000 on an actual basis and adjusted to give
effect to our sale of 1,000,000 shares of the common stock being offered. The
as adjusted number of shares issued and outstanding presented in the following
table do not include the 100,000 shares in the aggregate reserved for issuance
upon exercise of the representative's warrants.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31 June 30 June 30
-------------------------- ------------- --------------
1998 1999 2000 2000
------------ ------------ ------------- --------------
(unaudited) (as adjusted)
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Composition of net assets
Common stock, $.01 par value, 19,000,000
shares authorized; 2,454,402, 2,782,226 and
2,782,226 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 1998 and 1999 and June 30, 2000,
respectively ................................ $ 24,544 $ 27,822 $ 27,822 $ 37,822
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000
shares authorized and none issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1998 and 1999 and
June 30, 2000, respectively ................. -- -- -- --
Additional paid-in capital ................... 629,262 2,136,010 2,136,010 6,642,010
Accumulated net operating income ............. 100,841 386,702 993,488 993,488
Net unrealized appreciation, net of deferred
income taxes ................................ 611,000 733,919 884,540 884,540
Net assets ...................................... 1,365,647 3,284,453 4,041,860 8,557,860
Total liabilities and net assets ................ 1,805,795 4,205,345 5,631,248 10,147,248
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock, after
deducting the estimated discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable by
us, will be approximately $4,516,000. We estimate that, if the underwriters
exercise in full their over-allotment option, the net proceeds from the sale of
our common stock, after similar deductions, will be approximately $5,299,000.
We intend to apply the estimated net proceeds, assuming the underwriters do not
exercise their over-allotment option, as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Approximate Percentage of
Application of Proceeds Amount Net Proceeds
----------------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Investments in portfolio companies ............................ $3,750,000 83%
Salaries and professional fees ................................ 542,000 12
General corporate purposes, including working capital ......... 224,000 5
---------- --
Total ...................................................... $4,516,000 100%
========== ===
</TABLE>
We reserve the right to reallocate proceeds to different uses if, in
management's view, the needs of the business so require.
We intend to invest approximately 83%, or $3,750,000 of the estimated net
proceeds in portfolio companies, either as initial or additional investments,
within two years from the closing of this offering. We provide funding and
managerial assistance to portfolio companies to assist in research and other
activities necessary to identify and develop emerging technologies and to
identify and market these to potential end-users. However, we do not in most
cases intend to provide funding to actually acquire rights in or to any
emerging technology until an acquiror has been identified and the portfolio
company or we have entered into an agreement to dispose of the asset or the
portfolio company, respectively. We believe that the net proceeds of this
offering will be sufficient to make approximately 10 initial investments. Our
estimated use of the net proceeds for salaries and professional fees are based
upon our projected expenses for the 12 month period following this offering. We
intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes
including working capital.
In the event that the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised,
the net proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment option will be used to
make investments in portfolio companies and for general corporate purposes
including working capital.
Pending investment in portfolio companies, we intend to invest the net
proceeds of any offering of shares in time deposits, income-producing
securities with maturities of three months or less that are issued or
guaranteed by the federal government or an agency of the federal government,
high quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of
investment or high quality money market funds. Our ability to achieve our
investment objective may be limited to the extent that the net proceeds of this
offering, pending full investment, are held in time deposits and other
short-term instruments.
16
<PAGE>
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our summary consolidated financial and other
data and has been derived from our audited financial statements for the years
ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, and unaudited financial statements for
the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 2000, all of which are included in
another section of this prospectus. The information below should be read in
conjunction with "Prospectus Summary -- Financial Highlights," "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
our consolidated financial statements and the notes to our consolidated
financial statements, each of which is included in another section of this
prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six months ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30
----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
------------- -------------- ---------------- -------------- ---------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Statement of Opera-
tions Data:
Income from operations .................... $ -- $ 381,843 $ 1,315,373 $ 934,052 $ 1,923,632
Expenses .................................. 5,115 213,437 728,322 422,886 949,390
---------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes ......... (5,115) 168,406 587,051 511,166 974,242
Provision (benefit) for income taxes ...... -- 62,450 301,190 (112,982) 367,456
---------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
Net income (loss) from operations ......... (5,115) 105,956 285,861 624,148 606,786
Net realized and unrealized gains ......... -- 611,000 122,919 605,000 150,621
---------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets ..... $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 408,780 $1,229,148 $ 757,407
========== =========== ============ ========== ===========
Per share net increase (decrease) in
net assets ............................... $ (0.00) $ 0.31 $ 0.15 $ 0.46 $ 0.27
Weighted average number of shares
used in per-share computations ........... 2,070,494 2,304,691 2,682,420 2,682,420 2,782,226
Unaudited pro forma information:
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
before pro forma effect of change in
UTEK's tax structure ..................... $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 408,780 $1,229,148 $ 757,407
Pro forma effect of change in tax
structure ................................ -- -- 78,794 (306,618) --
---------- ----------- ------------ ---------- -----------
Pro forma increase in net assets .......... $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 487,574 $ 922,530 $ 757,407
========== =========== ============ ========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31 June 30
------------------------------- ------------
1998 1999 2000
-------------- -------------- ------------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Investments at market value ......... $ 1,300,000 $ 2,594,931 $4,542,896
Cash and cash equivalents ........... 418,178 1,007,229 91,735
Total assets ........................ 1,805,795 4,205,345 5,631,248
Total liabilities ................... 440,148 920,892 1,589,388
Net assets .......................... 1,365,647 3,284,453 4,041,860
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. This
prospectus contains forward-looking statements regarding the plans and
objectives of management for future operations. The forward-looking statements
included herein are based on current expectations and assumptions that involve
numerous risks and uncertainties. Although management believes that the
assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of
the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no
assurance that the forward-looking statements included herein will prove to be
accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information
should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our
objectives and plans will be achieved.
General
Our primary business is to make investments in companies that possess or
will likely identify emerging and established technologies and markets for
those technologies. Our primary investment objective is to increase our net
assets by exchanging stock in our portfolio companies for cash and other assets
we will use to acquire licenses to additional technologies. We believe that we
will be able to achieve our objectives by concentrating on investments in
companies which we believe are likely to benefit from our management's
expertise in technology transfer.
The income that we derive from our investments in our portfolio companies
consists of both cash and equity securities that we receive upon disposition of
our portfolio companies. The appraised dollar value of the equities that we
receive makes up a significant portion of our revenues. An independent
appraiser assesses the value of our investments in portfolio companies.
Our expenses include salaries and wages, professional fees, sales and
marketing costs as well as general and administrative costs. Sales and
marketing costs include advertising, travel and other expenses that vary with
revenues. General and administrative costs include rent, depreciation,
telecommunications and other overhead costs.
We used an equity-based method of compensating certain outside service
providers during 1998 and 1999. Those costs are reflected in the general and
administrative costs of the statement of operations. Some service agreements
were for periods in excess of one year and any remaining value is recorded as a
prepaid expense for the period. Approximately $738,000 of our prepaid expenses
are attributable to the costs of this offering.
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2000 compared to the six months ended June 30, 1999
Income from operations. Income from operations increased 106% to
$1,923,632 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 from $934,052 for the six
months ended June 30, 1999. The increased income from operations resulted from
completing three technology transfers with substantially more value as
contrasted to four transfers completed in the first six months of 1999. As
described below, in the first six months of 2000, we sold one portfolio company
for $200,000 and completed two tax free mergers in which we received securities
valued at $1,706,472. An independent consultant valued the securities we
received. In our transactions with:
o Graphco Technologies, Inc., we received 100,799 shares of common stock of
Graphco Technologies, Inc. which were valued at the time of sale at $9.45
per share;
o Lexon, Inc., we sold one of our portfolio companies for $200,000. Under
the terms of the agreement, we received $50,000 on the date of the
transaction and $70,000 subsequently, with the remaining $80,000 plus
interest to be received by September 30, 2000; and
o The Quantum Group, Inc., we received 931,000 shares of common stock of
The Quantum Group, Inc. which were valued at the time of sale at $.81 per
share.
18
<PAGE>
Expenses. Total expenses increased 125% to $949,390 for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from $422,886 for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
General and administrative costs decreased 32% to $159,822 for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 from $234,965 for the six months ended June 30,
1999. The decrease was due to the timing of business and office expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses increased 874% to $525,303 for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from $53,905 for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The
increase in sales and marketing expenses resulted from upfront fees paid to
fund additional research for consummated technology transfers.
Salaries and wages costs increased 113% to $163,295 for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from $76,695 for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
Increased salary costs reflect the addition of a full-time manager of
technology alliances, an additional full-time executive assistant, and our
president.
Professional fees increased 76% to $100,970 for the six months ended June
30, 2000 from $57,321 for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase is
the result of the engagement of auditors, attorneys and other professional
service providers whose services were necessary for preparing documents related
to this offering and otherwise to grow our business. We anticipate that a
significant portion of these expenses will be recurring in nature.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Income Taxes. Unrealized
appreciation of investments amounted to $150,621 for the six months ended June
30, 2000, a 75% decrease from $605,000 for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
The relative decreased appreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2000
resulted from a decrease in the value our investments in Lexon and NuElectric.
Our effective tax rate was a provision of 38% for the six months ended
June 30, 2000 compared with a benefit of 22% for the six months ended June 30,
1999. The benefit recorded in 1999 is primarily the result of the tax losses
generated by certain of our subsidiaries while the income we generated (during
the period of time in 1999 when we were structured as an limited liability
company) passed through to our then members.
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Income from operations. Income from operations increased 244% to
$1,315,373 for the year ended December 31, 1999 from $381,843 for the year
ended December 31, 1998. This increase was due to the completion of
transactions with four companies in 1999 versus one transaction during the year
ended December 31, 1998. In each transaction we received restricted shares in a
tax-free exchange for a portfolio company. An independent consultant valued the
shares received in each transaction. In our transactions with:
o Image Analysis, Inc., we received 879,300 shares of common stock of Image
Analysis, Inc. The shares were valued at time of sale at $0.25 per share;
o Nucor Enterprises, Inc., we received 900,000 shares of common stock of
Nucor, Inc. The shares were valued at time of sale at $0.14 per share;
o Centrex, Inc., we received 1,584,000 shares of common stock of Centrex,
Inc. The shares were at time of sale valued at $0.33; and
o NuElectric, Inc., we received 791,957 shares of common stock of
NuElectric. The shares were valued at time of sale at $0.29 per share.
Subsequent to this transaction, we exchanged 300,000 NuElectric, Inc.
shares for 150 shares of Rosbon, Inc. in a private transaction of equal
value. As of December 31, 1999 we owned 491,957 shares in NuElectric, Inc.
We also entered into several consulting agreements that generated
aggregate revenues of $165,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999 as compared
to $55,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998.
Expenses. Total expenses increased 241% to $728,322 for the year ended
December 31, 1999 from $213,437 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Salaries
and wages increased 623% to $197,125 for the year ended December 31, 1999 from
$27,275 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Professional fees increased as
well by 4,595% to $184,697 for the year ended December 31, 1999 from $3,934 for
the year ended December 31, 1998. Sales and marketing costs increased 21% to
$79,544 from $65,649. General and administrative
19
<PAGE>
expenses increased by 129% to $266,956 for the year ended December 31, 1999
from $116,579 for the year ended December 31, 1998. These increases were the
result of not being fully operational until May 1998, as well as increases in
staff and salaries and the engagement of auditors and other professional
service providers necessary to grow our business. We anticipate that these will
be reoccurring expenses.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Income Taxes. Unrealized
appreciation of investments decreased 80% to $122,919 for the year ended
December 31, 1999 versus $611,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998. The
relative decrease in appreciation resulted from a decline in the value of our
investment in Lexon, Inc. While there were increases in appreciation related to
our investments in Image Analysis, Inc. and NuElectric, Inc., the overall
effect yielded a net decrease.
Our effective tax rate was a provision of 51% for the year ended December
31, 1999 compared with a provision of 37% for the year ended December 31, 1998.
The provision recorded in 1999 is higher primarily as a result of the tax
losses generated by UTEK LLC (UTEK LLC was formed on December 31, 1998) which
were passed through to its members.
Year ended December 31, 1998 compared to year ended December 31, 1997
Income from operations. Income from operations was $381,843 for the year
ended December 31, 1998. We did not have any income from operations for the
year ended December 31, 1997. The increase in income from operations was the
result of completing our first full year of operations in 1998. During 1998, we
completed one technology transfer transaction which generated income of
$320,000. In addition, we received a $55,000 consulting fee.
Expenses. Total expenses increased to $213,437 for the year ended December
31, 1998 from $5,115 for the year ended December 31, 1997. There were no
salaries and wages, professional fees, or sales and marketing costs in 1997.
General and administrative costs increased 2,179% to $116,579 for the year
ended December 31, 1998 from $5,115 for the year ended December 31, 1997. In
1997 there were only general and administrative start up costs, and during 1998
our business was not fully operational until May. Some of the 1998 sales and
marketing costs were related to transactions that took place in 1999.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Income Taxes. Unrealized
appreciation of investments amounted to $611,000 for the year ended December
31, 1998. The appreciation relates to our investment in Lexon, Inc. We did not
hold any investments during 1997.
Our effective tax rate was 37% for the year ended December 31, 1998. We
did not record a benefit or provision for the year ended December 31, 1997
since we did not have any significant operations during that year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net assets increased 23% to $4,041,860 for the six months ended June 30,
2000 from $3,284,453 for the year ended December 31, 1999. This increase was a
result of net income from operations and appreciation of investments.
Net assets increased 141% to $3,284,453 for the year ended December 31,
1999 from $1,365,647 for the year ended December 31, 1998. This increase was a
result of net income from operations, appreciation of investments and
additional capital contributions to us.
Our primary source of liquidity and capital through June 30, 2000 was the
issuance of common stock rather than income from operations. Our income from
operations consists primarily of the sale of technology rights for equity
securities rather than cash. In total, we completed three private placement
transactions resulting in proceeds of $530,433 in 1998 and $1,305,807 in 1999.
On June 30, 2000 we had $91,735 in cash and no debt. Based upon our anticipated
capital needs for operations, general corporate purposes, and future research
and development agreements with universities to complete technology transfer
transactions, management believes that the net proceeds received from this
offering will be sufficient to meet our funding requirements for at least 12
months.
20
<PAGE>
On September 13, 2000, we secured a revolving line of credit with a
financial institution. This line of credit permits us to borrow up to $150,000.
Advances under the line of credit bear interest at the financial institution's
prime rate, currently 9.5% per annum. The line of credit is due on demand and
is secured by a pledge of a portion of our investments in non-controlled
affiliates and the personal guarantees of the chief executive officer, a
director, and a shareholder.
We believe that, upon consummation of this offering, we will have
sufficient capital to implement our current investment objectives. However, our
ability to meet our future investment objectives may be dependent upon our
ability to raise capital from time to time through the sale of equity
securities. There can be no assurance that we can raise funds when and if
required. We currently have no material commitments for capital expenditures,
except as described under "Use of Proceeds" and to finance the working capital
needs of our portfolio companies.
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risks
Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S.
interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in
short-term instruments. Due to the nature of our short term investments, we
have concluded that we do not have material market risks exposure.
Our investment policy requires us to invest funds in excess of current
operating requirements in:
o obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies;
o investment grade state and local government obligations;
o securities of U.S. corporations rated A1 or P1 by Standard & Poors or
the Moody's equivalents; and/or
o money market funds, deposits or notes issued or guaranteed by U.S. and
non-U.S. commercial banks meeting certain credit rating and net worth
requirements with maturities of less than two years.
At June 30, 2000 our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of
demand deposits and money market funds held by a large institution in the U.S.
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. This
prospectus contains forward-looking statements regarding the plans and
objectives of management for future operations. The forward-looking statements
included herein are based on current expectations and assumptions that involve
numerous risks and uncertainties. Although management believes that the
assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of
the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no
assurance that the forward-looking statements included herein will prove to be
accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information
should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our
objectives and plans will be achieved.
General
Our primary business is to make investments in companies that possess or
will likely identify emerging and established technologies and markets for
those technologies. Our primary investment objective is to increase our net
assets by exchanging stock in our portfolio companies for cash and other assets
we will use to acquire licenses to additional technologies. We believe that we
will be able to achieve our objectives by concentrating on investments in
companies which we believe are likely to benefit from our management's
expertise in technology transfer.
The income that we derive from our investments in our portfolio companies
consists of both cash and equity securities that we receive upon disposition of
our portfolio companies. The appraised dollar value of the equities that we
receive makes up a significant portion of our revenues. An independent
appraiser assesses the value of our investments in portfolio companies.
Our expenses include salaries and wages, professional fees, sales and
marketing costs as well as general and administrative costs. Sales and
marketing costs include advertising, travel and other expenses that vary with
revenues. General and administrative costs include rent, depreciation,
telecommunications and other overhead costs.
We used an equity-based method of compensating certain outside service
providers during 1998 and 1999. Those costs are reflected in the general and
administrative costs of the statement of operations. Some service agreements
were for periods in excess of one year and any remaining value is recorded as a
prepaid expense for the period. Approximately $738,000 of our prepaid expenses
are attributable to the costs of this offering.
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2000 compared to the six months ended June 30, 1999
Income from operations. Income from operations increased 106% to
$1,923,632 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 from $934,052 for the six
months ended June 30, 1999. The increased income from operations resulted from
completing three technology transfers with substantially more value as
contrasted to four transfers completed in the first six months of 1999. As
described below, in the first six months of 2000, we sold one portfolio company
for $200,000 and completed two tax free mergers in which we received securities
valued at $1,706,472. An independent consultant valued the securities we
received. In our transactions with:
o Graphco Technologies, Inc., we received 100,799 shares of common stock of
Graphco Technologies, Inc. which were valued at the time of sale at $9.45
per share;
o Lexon, Inc., we sold one of our portfolio companies for $200,000. Under
the terms of the agreement, we received $50,000 on the date of the
transaction and $70,000 subsequently, with the remaining $80,000 plus
interest to be received by September 30, 2000; and
o The Quantum Group, Inc., we received 931,000 shares of common stock of
The Quantum Group, Inc. which were valued at the time of sale at $.81 per
share.
18
<PAGE>
Expenses. Total expenses increased 125% to $949,390 for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from $422,886 for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
General and administrative costs decreased 32% to $159,822 for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 from $234,965 for the six months ended June 30,
1999. The decrease was due to the timing of business and office expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses increased 874% to $525,303 for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from $53,905 for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The
increase in sales and marketing expenses resulted from upfront fees paid to
fund additional research for consummated technology transfers.
Salaries and wages costs increased 113% to $163,295 for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 from $76,695 for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
Increased salary costs reflect the addition of a full-time manager of
technology alliances, an additional full-time executive assistant, and our
president.
Professional fees increased 76% to $100,970 for the six months ended June
30, 2000 from $57,321 for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase is
the result of the engagement of auditors, attorneys and other professional
service providers whose services were necessary for preparing documents related
to this offering and otherwise to grow our business. We anticipate that a
significant portion of these expenses will be recurring in nature.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Income Taxes. Unrealized
appreciation of investments amounted to $150,621 for the six months ended June
30, 2000, a 75% decrease from $605,000 for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
The relative decreased appreciation for the six months ended June 30, 2000
resulted from a decrease in the value our investments in Lexon and NuElectric.
Our effective tax rate was a provision of 38% for the six months ended
June 30, 2000 compared with a benefit of 22% for the six months ended June 30,
1999. The benefit recorded in 1999 is primarily the result of the tax losses
generated by certain of our subsidiaries while the income we generated (during
the period of time in 1999 when we were structured as an limited liability
company) passed through to our then members.
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Income from operations. Income from operations increased 244% to
$1,315,373 for the year ended December 31, 1999 from $381,843 for the year
ended December 31, 1998. This increase was due to the completion of
transactions with four companies in 1999 versus one transaction during the year
ended December 31, 1998. In each transaction we received restricted shares in a
tax-free exchange for a portfolio company. An independent consultant valued the
shares received in each transaction. In our transactions with:
o Image Analysis, Inc., we received 879,300 shares of common stock of Image
Analysis, Inc. The shares were valued at time of sale at $0.25 per share;
o Nucor Enterprises, Inc., we received 900,000 shares of common stock of
Nucor, Inc. The shares were valued at time of sale at $0.14 per share;
o Centrex, Inc., we received 1,584,000 shares of common stock of Centrex,
Inc. The shares were at time of sale valued at $0.33; and
o NuElectric, Inc., we received 791,957 shares of common stock of
NuElectric. The shares were valued at time of sale at $0.29 per share.
Subsequent to this transaction, we exchanged 300,000 NuElectric, Inc.
shares for 150 shares of Rosbon, Inc. in a private transaction of equal
value. As of December 31, 1999 we owned 491,957 shares in NuElectric, Inc.
We also entered into several consulting agreements that generated
aggregate revenues of $165,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999 as compared
to $55,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998.
Expenses. Total expenses increased 241% to $728,322 for the year ended
December 31, 1999 from $213,437 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Salaries
and wages increased 623% to $197,125 for the year ended December 31, 1999 from
$27,275 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Professional fees increased as
well by 4,595% to $184,697 for the year ended December 31, 1999 from $3,934 for
the year ended December 31, 1998. Sales and marketing costs increased 21% to
$79,544 from $65,649. General and administrative
19
<PAGE>
expenses increased by 129% to $266,956 for the year ended December 31, 1999
from $116,579 for the year ended December 31, 1998. These increases were the
result of not being fully operational until May 1998, as well as increases in
staff and salaries and the engagement of auditors and other professional
service providers necessary to grow our business. We anticipate that these will
be reoccurring expenses.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Income Taxes. Unrealized
appreciation of investments decreased 80% to $122,919 for the year ended
December 31, 1999 versus $611,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998. The
relative decrease in appreciation resulted from a decline in the value of our
investment in Lexon, Inc. While there were increases in appreciation related to
our investments in Image Analysis, Inc. and NuElectric, Inc., the overall
effect yielded a net decrease.
Our effective tax rate was a provision of 51% for the year ended December
31, 1999 compared with a provision of 37% for the year ended December 31, 1998.
The provision recorded in 1999 is higher primarily as a result of the tax
losses generated by UTEK LLC (UTEK LLC was formed on December 31, 1998) which
were passed through to its members.
Year ended December 31, 1998 compared to year ended December 31, 1997
Income from operations. Income from operations was $381,843 for the year
ended December 31, 1998. We did not have any income from operations for the
year ended December 31, 1997. The increase in income from operations was the
result of completing our first full year of operations in 1998. During 1998, we
completed one technology transfer transaction which generated income of
$320,000. In addition, we received a $55,000 consulting fee.
Expenses. Total expenses increased to $213,437 for the year ended December
31, 1998 from $5,115 for the year ended December 31, 1997. There were no
salaries and wages, professional fees, or sales and marketing costs in 1997.
General and administrative costs increased 2,179% to $116,579 for the year
ended December 31, 1998 from $5,115 for the year ended December 31, 1997. In
1997 there were only general and administrative start up costs, and during 1998
our business was not fully operational until May. Some of the 1998 sales and
marketing costs were related to transactions that took place in 1999.
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Income Taxes. Unrealized
appreciation of investments amounted to $611,000 for the year ended December
31, 1998. The appreciation relates to our investment in Lexon, Inc. We did not
hold any investments during 1997.
Our effective tax rate was 37% for the year ended December 31, 1998. We
did not record a benefit or provision for the year ended December 31, 1997
since we did not have any significant operations during that year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net assets increased 23% to $4,041,860 for the six months ended June 30,
2000 from $3,284,453 for the year ended December 31, 1999. This increase was a
result of net income from operations and appreciation of investments.
Net assets increased 141% to $3,284,453 for the year ended December 31,
1999 from $1,365,647 for the year ended December 31, 1998. This increase was a
result of net income from operations, appreciation of investments and
additional capital contributions to us.
Our primary source of liquidity and capital through June 30, 2000 was the
issuance of common stock rather than income from operations. Our income from
operations consists primarily of the sale of technology rights for equity
securities rather than cash. In total, we completed three private placement
transactions resulting in proceeds of $530,433 in 1998 and $1,305,807 in 1999.
On June 30, 2000 we had $91,735 in cash and no debt. Based upon our anticipated
capital needs for operations, general corporate purposes, and future research
and development agreements with universities to complete technology transfer
transactions, management believes that the net proceeds received from this
offering will be sufficient to meet our funding requirements for at least 12
months.
20
<PAGE>
On September 13, 2000, we secured a revolving line of credit with a
financial institution. This line of credit permits us to borrow up to $150,000.
Advances under the line of credit bear interest at the financial institution's
prime rate, currently 9.5% per annum. The line of credit is due on demand and
is secured by a pledge of a portion of our investments in non-controlled
affiliates and the personal guarantees of the chief executive officer, a
director, and a shareholder.
We believe that, upon consummation of this offering, we will have
sufficient capital to implement our current investment objectives. However, our
ability to meet our future investment objectives may be dependent upon our
ability to raise capital from time to time through the sale of equity
securities. There can be no assurance that we can raise funds when and if
required. We currently have no material commitments for capital expenditures,
except as described under "Use of Proceeds" and to finance the working capital
needs of our portfolio companies.
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risks
Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S.
interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in
short-term instruments. Due to the nature of our short term investments, we
have concluded that we do not have material market risks exposure.
Our investment policy requires us to invest funds in excess of current
operating requirements in:
o obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies;
o investment grade state and local government obligations;
o securities of U.S. corporations rated A1 or P1 by Standard & Poors or
the Moody's equivalents; and/or
o money market funds, deposits or notes issued or guaranteed by U.S. and
non-U.S. commercial banks meeting certain credit rating and net worth
requirements with maturities of less than two years.
At June 30, 2000 our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of
demand deposits and money market funds held by a large institution in the U.S.
21
<PAGE>
BUSINESS
General Information and History
We are a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that
has elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act.
We commenced operations in 1997 as UTEK Corporation ("UTEK Florida"),
which was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida in August 1996.
UTEK Florida was engaged in the business of technology transfer. On December
31, 1998, we formed UTEK, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the
laws of the State of Florida. Subsequent thereto, the shareholders of UTEK
Florida exchanged their shares of common stock for membership units in UTEK,
LLC. In July 1999, we formed UTEK Corporation under the laws of the State of
Delaware and in October 1999, UTEK LLC was merged into UTEK Corporation.
Prior to our election to operate as a closed end investment company
treated as a BDC, we were engaged in the business of technology transfer as an
operating company.
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Objectives
Our primary investment objective is to increase our net assets by
exchanging stock in our portfolio companies for cash and other assets we will
use to acquire additional technologies. We seek to achieve our investment
objective by developing our portfolio companies that identify, license and
market new technologies invented primarily by employees of universities and
laboratories. We intend to merge our portfolio companies principally into
publicly traded companies in tax free stock for stock exchanges. Shares
received in those exchanges will, in the course of our business, be converted
to cash and other assets to permit us to invest in additional portfolio
companies. As a BDC, we generally may change our non-fundamental investment
objectives and policies without stockholder approval but we require stockholder
approval to change our fundamental investment objectives. We do not have a
registered investment adviser and our management, under the supervision of our
board of directors, makes our management decisions.
Since our election to operate as a BDC, we have concentrated our efforts
on making controlling equity investments in portfolio companies in private
transactions. Our investments consist of funding to be used to identify,
research and market new technologies and for the acquisition of licenses to
those new technologies and, when appropriate, the support of sponsored research
programs to further the development of licensed technology. In return for our
investments, we receive common stock in our portfolio companies. We also
provide these portfolio companies with significant managerial assistance by
having one or more members of our management serve as directors and officers of
our portfolio companies. After we have made an investment, we help our
portfolio companies in their business of researching, identifying and
developing new technologies and markets. We also assist them in acquiring the
licenses to new technologies developed at universities and research
laboratories. Our management provides portfolio companies with significant
assistance in locating and acquiring these technologies and markets for them.
We then find merger partners for our portfolio companies who will acquire the
portfolio company from us in exchange for common stock.
Our investments are concentrated in small or development stage companies
that license and develop new technologies for commercial applications.
Moreover, our investments in portfolio companies may be concentrated in one or
more industries. In this event, we will not obtain any advantages that may
result from diversifying our portfolio company investments among more
industries. We do not contemplate permitting our portfolio companies to expend
significant sums on a new venture, which cannot be recovered in due course,
absent the execution letters of intent or definitive merger agreements for the
resale of the technology or the merger of the portfolio company. However, we
intend to make initial investments in our portfolio companies in amounts
sufficient to permit them to conduct initial research and, in some cases, to
fund additional development of new technologies and markets. Since
substantially all of our portfolio companies are early stage companies, our
portfolio company investments do not benefit from any diversification of risk
that may
22
<PAGE>
result from spreading investments among companies at various stages of
development. Furthermore, a portfolio company may spend all of the money that
we have invested without finding, acquiring or locating a new technology or
suitable market for a new technology, in which case we would likely lose our
entire investment in the portfolio company.
We intend to take advantage of our experience in the field of technology
transfer to maximize the return on our investments in portfolio companies.
Technology transfer refers to the process by which new technologies, developed
in universities, government research facilities, or similar research settings,
are acquired and licensed to companies for commercial development and use. Our
management and certain members of our board of directors have experience in
technology transfer. Our investments in our portfolio companies are structured,
through our U2BSM investment model, to allow us to take advantage of our
management's expertise and to give us control of the portfolio company. In
addition, we intend to capitalize on relationships that members of our
management and board of directors have developed with universities and
government research laboratories.
Subject to limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, our investment objectives,
policies and investment diversification status may change at any time and from
time to time without stockholder approval.
We anticipate that a substantial portion of our investment opportunities
will be presented to us as a result of management's contacts with universities,
research laboratories and in private industry.
Fundamental Policies
We do not contemplate issuing senior securities. We will not issue senior
securities except in accordance with restrictions imposed by Section 61 of the
1940 Act which require, among other things, asset coverage in the amount of at
least 200% of our net assets. Further, we may issue more than one class of
senior securities and warrants, options or other profit sharing arrangements,
subject to the provisions set forth in Section 61. We will not sell securities
short or on margin, write puts or calls or purchase or sell commodities or
commodity contracts. We may from time to time sell some of the securities we
receive in consideration for stock for our portfolio companies in exchange for
real estate, which may be subject to mortgages. The amount of assumed mortgages
will not exceed 15% of our net assets. We did, on one occasion, exchange a
portion of securities we received for a portfolio company for common stock in a
company whose only asset was real estate. We will not underwrite the issuance
of securities of other companies. We will not purchase real estate mortgage
loans. We will limit the amount of money we borrow to 30% of our net assets.
Where necessary, we may make loans to or additional investments in portfolio
companies to protect our initial investment and we will continue to invest in
restricted securities of portfolio companies. We will not make loans to our
portfolio companies which in the aggregate exceed 25% of our net assets. We may
concentrate our investments in a particular industry or group. However, we do
not intend to concentrate on investments in one industry.
Our board of directors has adopted the following policies regarding
investments in portfolio companies. We have agreed with the representative of
the underwriters that these policies will not be modified by the Board of
Directors for a period of 12 months after this offering without the
representative's prior written consent. These policies include:
o limiting the amount of our total investment in any single portfolio
company to $500,000 or 10% of our net assets, whichever is less;
o not permitting a portfolio company to commit significant amounts of the
funds we have invested towards payment to third parties for the
acquisition of the rights to a technology or the further development of a
technology, until we have an agreement in place to resell the technology
or to merge the portfolio company with an acquiring company or at least an
executed letter of intent for a merger or sale; and
o limiting in the future the number of new portfolio companies that we will
merge with private companies such that our total investment in our
portfolio companies that have merged with private companies does not
exceed 10% of our total net assets measured as of the date of this
offering.
23
<PAGE>
We contemplate that, based on existing federal tax law, most sales of our
portfolio companies will be structured as merger transactions where we will
receive common stock in the acquiror in exchange for all our shares in our
portfolio company.
Our Investment Model
Our investments in portfolio companies generally follow a specific series
of steps which our management believes provide the greatest opportunity for
long term appreciation of our assets. As our investments are designed to bring
and develop technologies from their inception at universities to the private
sector, we refer to our investment model as "U2B" SM. Using our U2BSM
investment model, we intend to acquire securities in portfolio companies and
eventually exchange those securities for securities in public companies that
acquire our portfolio companies. The following is a list of the steps that we
generally take when we make an investment in a portfolio company using our
investment model:
1. Evaluate potential technology growth fields.
2. Form and make a controlling equity investment in the portfolio company.
3. Assist the portfolio company in the identification and evaluation of new
technologies and markets that offer the portfolio company a significant
opportunity for growth.
4. When appropriate, advise and assist the portfolio company in negotiating
a sponsored research agreement to further develop the technology.
5. Identify and contact potential "merger partners" to merge with the
portfolio company.
6. Advise and assist the portfolio company in completing the technology
transfer with the research institution and acquiring the license to the
technology.
7. Complete the sale of the portfolio company to the "merger partners" and
receive compensation for the sale of all the stock we hold in the
portfolio company.
8. Sell any securities received in exchange for the portfolio company and
use the proceeds to make additional investments.
Investment Evaluation Process
New technology opportunities may come to our attention from many sources.
The primary sources to date have been from our management's contacts with
universities and in the private sector. We believe that the ability of our
management to maintain and develop relationships with university and research
laboratories is a key factor in our ability to identify new potential
investment opportunities.
Prior to a portfolio company committing funds to an investment
opportunity, we will assist the portfolio company by conducting research
regarding the prospects and risks of the potential investment. Our scientific
advisory council and management's experience is essential in evaluating:
o new technologies,
o products,
o markets,
o industry trends,
o financial requirements,
o competition, and
o the operating record and quality of the entrepreneurial group associated
with a prospective investment.
Although our management has scientific and professional experience, they
may have limited or no experience in the specific areas of business in which
potential merger candidates are engaged.
24
<PAGE>
Investments in Portfolio Companies
Our initial investments will be made in transactions that will normally be
negotiated directly by our management with the portfolio company or an
affiliate of the portfolio company. In all prior and most future instances, we
have formed or will form our portfolio companies as subsidiaries. Our
management will seek to structure the terms of the investment so as to provide
for the capital needs and success of the portfolio company and at the same time
to maximize our opportunity for long-term capital appreciation. An important
factor in successful investing is proper structuring of the transaction in
terms of:
o price,
o type of security,
o restrictions on use of funds,
o commitments or rights to provide additional financing,
o control and involvement in the issuer's business and liquidity, and
o a viable plan to realize liquidity and capital appreciation on the
investment.
We intend to limit our total cash investments in any individual portfolio
company to the lesser of $500,000 or an amount equal to ten percent of our net
assets at the time of investment. To date, our initial investments have been
less than that amount. By limiting the size of our total investment in any one
portfolio company, we hope to reduce and diversify our risks. In exchange for
our investment, we will receive such number of shares of common stock in the
portfolio company to give us a controlling interest. To date, all of our
portfolio company securities have been common stock and we anticipate that we
will continue to acquire common stock in portfolio companies. Use of the funds
that we provide to portfolio companies will be restricted to obtaining licenses
to new technologies and developing and marketing those technologies. Our
management's involvement with the portfolio companies will primarily be
directed towards helping them acquire technology licenses and, when
appropriate, establishing sponsored research programs to further develop the
technology. We then plan to achieve some form of liquidity for our portfolio
investments by selling our portfolio companies primarily to public companies.
Identifying New Technologies
We have developed relationships with a number of universities in the
United States that actively conduct research. In order to provide us early
access to new technologies, we have entered into alliances, licensing or
license option agreements with the following institutions:
Agreement with the University of South Florida
In January 1998, we entered into an agreement with the University of South
Florida pursuant to which we have agreed to review and evaluate the commercial
potential of certain new technologies developed at the university that are
presented to us. In return, we have the ability, if we deem it appropriate, to
enter into license option agreements with the university providing our company
with the exclusive right to seek a licensee or other commercial opportunity for
the technology, provided mutually agreeable terms are reached, for a limited
period of time. We have reviewed and negotiated licenses with the University of
South Florida on the following technologies:
o a new diagnostic test for colon, testicular and ovarian cancer,
o a new software technology for digitally coloring MRIs to facilitate their
reading and the rendering of diagnoses, and
o a new technique to identify cryptosporidium (a water-borne parasite) in
water.
The term of the agreement is for three years, however either party may
terminate the agreement on 60 days written notice.
25
<PAGE>
Agreement with the University of Memphis
In May 1998, we entered into an agreement with the University of Memphis
pursuant to which we have agreed to evaluate the commercial potential of select
technologies developed at the university that are presented to us for review.
The university has agreed that upon our request, it will file patents to
protect technologies that we wish to have protected. In addition, under the
agreement, the university may grant to us license option agreements which will
give us the exclusive rights to license a particular technology, provided
mutually agreeable terms are reached, for a period of 12 months.
The term of the agreement is five years, but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with Johns Hopkins University
In June 1999, we entered into an agreement with Johns Hopkins University
pursuant to which we have agreed to evaluate the commercial potential of
certain technologies developed at the university that are presented to us for
review. The university has agreed that upon our request, it will file patents
to protect technologies that we wish to have protected. In addition, under the
agreement, the university may grant to us license option agreements which will
give us the exclusive rights to license the technology, provided mutually
agreeable terms are reached, for a period of 12 months.
The term of the agreement is five years, but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with the University of Florida
In October 1999, we entered into an agreement with the University of
Florida pursuant to which we have agreed to evaluate the commercial potential
of certain technologies developed at the university that are presented to us
for evaluation. Under the agreement, the university may grant us license option
agreements which will give us the exclusive rights to license the technology,
provided mutually agreeable terms are reached, for a period of 12 months.
The term of the agreement is five years, but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with Fraunhofer Institute of Germany for Interfacial Engineering and
Biotechnology IGB
In November 1999, we entered into a strategic alliance with Fraunhofer
pursuant to which we have agreed to review certain technologies developed at
Fraunhofer to gauge their potential for successful commercialization in the
United States. Pursuant to the agreement, Fraunhofer will grant to us a 12
month, exclusive, royalty free license option for the technologies reviewed, if
we so request. We may then license these technologies, provided mutually
agreeable terms are reached.
The term of the agreement is five years, but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties
In December 1999, we entered into an agreement with Virginia Tech
Intellectual Properties pursuant to which we have agreed to evaluate the
commercial potential of certain technologies developed at Virginia Tech
Intellectual Properties, that are presented to us for evaluation. Under the
agreement, Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties may grant us license option
agreements which will give us the exclusive rights to license the technology,
provided mutually agreeable terms are reached, for a period of 12 months.
The term of the agreement is five years, but may be terminated by either
party on 30 days written notice.
Agreement with Florida Institute of Technology
In March 2000, we entered into an agreement with Florida Institute of
Technology to review certain technologies developed at Florida Institute of
Technology to gauge their potential for successful commercialization. Under the
agreement, Florida Institute of Technology may grant us a 12 month exclusive,
royalty free license option agreement for these technologies. We may then
license these technologies, provided mutually agreeable terms are reached, for
a period of 12 months.
The term of the agreement is five years but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
26
<PAGE>
Agreement with Florida State University Research Foundation
In December 1999, we entered into an agreement with Florida State
University Research Foundation to review certain technologies developed at the
Research Foundation to gauge their potential for successful commercialization.
Under the agreement, the Research Foundation may grant us a 12 month exclusive,
royalty-free license option agreement for these technologies. We may then
license these technologies, provided mutually agreeable terms are reached, for
a period of 12 months.
The term of the agreement is five years but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with Sopartec
In May 2000, we entered into an agreement with Sopartec to review certain
technologies developed at the Universite Catholique de Louvain to gauge their
potential for successful commercialization. Under the agreement, either the
Universite or Sopartec may grant us exclusive 12 month options to license
certain technologies, provided mutually agreeable terms are reached.
The term of the agreement is for five years but may be terminated by
either party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with Auburn University
In June 2000, we entered into an agreement with Auburn University to
review certain technologies developed at Auburn to gauge their potential for
successful commercialization. Under the agreement, Auburn may grant us an
exclusive, 12 month royalty-free license option agreement for these
technologies.
The term of the agreement is five years but may be terminated by either
party on 60 days written notice.
Agreement with Caltech
In June 2000, we entered into an agreement with California Institute of
Technology (also known as Caltech) to review its intellectual property and
technologies to gauge their potential for successful commercialization. Under
the agreement, Caltech may grant a 12 month exclusive, royalty-free license
option agreement for these technologies.
The term of the agreement is for five years but may be terminated by
either party on 60 days written notice.
Evaluation and Acquisition of Technology
With few exceptions, all technologies developed by university faculty are
the property of the universities we work with and are licensed by the
university's research foundations or similar organizations to our portfolio
companies for commercialization. To help facilitate the identification of and
access to new technology, we have created a Scientific Advisory Council to
review technologies developed at universities and laboratories.
When we assist a new portfolio company to evaluate a new technology, we
review the technology to make sure that it meets three criteria:
o the technology must represent a significant advance over existing
technologies;
o there must be an existing global market for the technology once it is
commercialized; and
o the technology must be socially responsible (i.e., not intended for
destructive or harmful purposes).
If, in our management's view, a technology meets these criteria, then they
will assist the portfolio company in commencing negotiations with the
technology developer to arrange for a license. Our management will review
license agreements and advise portfolio companies as to license terms and
requirements. In addition, when we require assistance in evaluating a
technology, our management will have the technology reviewed by members of our
Scientific Advisory Council.
27
<PAGE>
Our Scientific Advisory Council is chaired by Stuart Brooks, M.D. Dr. Reischl
serves as the executive director of the Scientific Advisory Council. Our
Scientific Advisory Council currently consists of the following members:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Title Expertise
------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Albert J. Anthony, D.M.D. Retired Dentistry and dental equipment.
Gunter Blobel, M.D., Ph.D. Professor, Cell Biology, Cell biology/Nobel
Rockefeller University Prize winner in
Medicine (1999).
Alain M. Boudet, Ph.D. Professor, University of Paul Cell and molecular plant biology.
Sabatier
Russell Brantman, Ph.D. Consultant Mechanical engineering/Systems
Engineering/Vehicle safety
systems/Crash simulations.
Stuart Brooks, M.D. Professor, University of South Florida Lung disease/Allergies.
Chairman Scientific Advisory Council Respiratory Illness. Occupational
medicine.
Tzann T. Fang, M.D. Physician, Midwestern Regional Medical oncology/Internal
Medical Center medicine/Hematology
Jui-Sung Hung, M.D., F.A.C.C. Professor, China Medical College Cardiology.
Hospital
Gerald Krueger, Ph.D., CPE Principal Scientist/Ergonomist, Human performance
Col. U.S. Army (retired) enhancement/
Human systems design.
Jean-Marie Lehn, Ph.D. Professor, College de France, Nanotechnologies/Nobel
Strasbourg, France Prize winner in Chemistry (1987).
Yun-Fan Liaw, M.D. Professor, Chang Gung Medical Gastroenterology/Hepatology.
College
O. Norman Nesheim, Ph.D. Professor, University of Florida Pesticide regulation and safety
management/ Food and water
safety with pesticide use.
George Newkome, Ph.D. Vice President of Research, Molecular chemistry.
University of South Florida
Charles Proctor, Ph.D., P.E. Research Associate Professor, Orthopedic implants and devices.
University of Florida
Peter Reischl, Ph.D. Professor, San Jose State University Electrical engineering/
High frequency energy conversion.
Uwe Reischl, Ph.D., M.D. President, UTEK Corporation Architectural engineering/
Executive Director Scientific Industrial health and safety/
Advisory Council Occupational medicine.
Brian B. Schwartz, Ph.D. Professor, Graduate School of the Physics and material science.
City University of New York
Dean Sheppard, M.D. Professor, University of California Molecular biology.
- San Francisco
Michael Zaworotko, Ph.D. Professor, University of Nanotechnology/
South Florida Crystal engineering/
X-ray crystallography.
</TABLE>
Identifying Acquisition Candidates
In order to realize a return on our investments in our portfolio
companies, we must sell our portfolio companies or the technology and
development rights they hold. Based on current tax law and industry conditions,
it is our policy to sell our portfolio companies to acquirors in merger
transactions where we receive shares in the acquiring company in a tax-free
exchange for all of our shares in our portfolio company. In this manner, all
rights to technologies held by our portfolio companies transfer to the acquiror
and the acquiror assumes all obligations under the license agreements. Most of
our merger transactions to date have been with private companies whose common
stock is not publicly traded. Our goal is to engage in merger transactions
primarily with public companies.
Our management has primary responsibility for locating suitable merger
partners. However, we have formed a network of independent marketing
representatives with diverse backgrounds offering varied expertise
28
<PAGE>
for the purpose of assisting us in locating promising prospects for mergers.
These representatives are located in Plant City and Tampa, Fla., New York,
Boston, Baltimore and Washington, D.C. as well as in Germany and Belgium. We
have entered into agreements with our independent marketing representatives.
Most of the agreements provide that a marketing representative will receive a
fixed fee of 10% of any cash or stock we receive in connection with the sale of
a portfolio company to a company that the representative has introduced to us.
In certain cases, we have issued marketing representatives shares of our common
stock as a flat fee for their services.
Some recent transactions that we have completed include the following:
In May 1998, Gentest, Inc. a portfolio company, merged with Lexon, Inc.,
an Oklahoma corporation. In connection with the merger, we received 1,000,000
shares of Lexon common stock and Lexon acquired ownership of Gentest, Inc.
which had acquired the exclusive license to develop, manufacture and market a
blood test that will potentially allow for the early screening of colon cancer
and certain types of ovarian and testicular cancers. Lexon is developing this
blood test for general laboratory use. The prototype blood test kit requires
additional evaluation and testing and cannot be sold in the United States. The
blood test kit requires FDA approval before it can be sold in the United
States.
Lexon is a public company with shares traded on the over-the-counter
bulletin board under the symbol LXXN. We currently own 924,973 shares of Lexon
common stock which represents approximately 12% of the 7,503,000 shares of
Lexon issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2000.
In June 1999, our portfolio company Clean Water Technologies, Inc., merged
with NuElectric Inc., a Delaware corporation. NuElectric is in the business of
acquiring, developing and marketing new technologies for conserving energy and
protecting the environment. In connection with the merger, we received 791,957
shares of NuElectric common stock. As a result of the merger, NuElectric
acquired the exclusive license to a new technology for removing arsenic from
water. In September 2000, our portfolio company Zorax, Inc. merged with
NuElectric. In connection with the merger, we received 546,000 shares of
NuElectric common stock. As a result of the merger, NuElectric acquired an
exclusive license to a technology for the separation of cystic parasitic forms
from water. NuElectric is a public company with shares traded on the
over-the-counter bulletin board under the symbol NRGE. We currently own
1,037,957 shares of NuElectric common stock, which represents approximately 25%
of the issued and outstanding common stock of NuElectric as of June 30, 2000.
In May 1999, Centrex, Inc. acquired E. Coli Measurement Systems, Inc., one
of our portfolio companies, in a merger transaction. Centrex has acquired the
exclusive license to a new technology for the detection of E. Coli bacteria in
food and water. In July 1999, E. Coli Measurement Systems, Inc. entered into a
licensing and sponsored research agreement with the University of California
regarding an E. Coli detection technology. The technology was developed at the
Los Alamos National Laboratory and Centrex is providing funding to develop a
prototype system for the rapid detection of E. Coli in food and water. Centrex
also holds an exclusive license to a new technology developed at the University
of South Florida for the automated detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in
water. Centrex is a privately held company. We own 1,584,000 shares of Centrex
common stock.
In January 1999, Image Analysis Corporation, a portfolio company, merged
with Image Analysis, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation. As a result of the merger,
Image Analysis, Inc. holds the exclusive license, patented in the United States
and other countries, to a new technology for producing color magnetic resonance
images, or MRI, from existing MRI scanners. Image Analysis, Inc. is currently
funding research and development of this new technology. The research is being
conducted at Brenau University in Georgia under the direction of Dr. Keith
Brown, the inventor of the technology. Image Analysis, Inc. is a privately held
company. We currently own 879,300 shares of common stock of Image Analysis,
Inc.
In May 1999, Advanced Reinforcing Technologies, Inc., a portfolio company,
merged with Nucor, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation. Nucor is involved with the
development of new materials for rebuilding and enhancing the infrastructure of
roads and bridges. Pursuant to the merger, Nucor acquired the exclusive license
for a new carbon fiber composite rebar building technology developed at Cornell
University. In addition, Advanced Reinforcing Technologies established a
sponsored research program for further development of its technology. Nucor is
a privately held company. We own 900,000 shares of common stock of Nucor.
29
<PAGE>
In January 2000, Lexon, Inc. purchased all of the issued and outstanding
stock of Cancer Diagnostics, Inc., one of our portfolio companies, for
$200,000. Under the terms of the Agreement and a subsequent extension granted
to Lexon, Inc. by us, we received $120,000 and will receive the remaining
$80,000 plus interest of approximately $8,000 by September 30, 2000.
In March 2000, Digital Personnel, Inc., a portfolio company, merged with
and into Graphco-DPI Holding Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Graphco
Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation. Graphco Technologies, Inc. is
involved with the development of personal identification technology and
software solutions for computer aided maintenance and support. As a result of
the merger, Graphco Technologies, Inc. acquired the exclusive worldwide license
to technology for new software designed to produce human likenesses that should
be able to simulate conversation for e-commerce applications. Graphco
Technologies, Inc. is a privately held company. We own 100,799 shares of common
stock of Graphco Technologies, Inc.
In June 2000, Advanced Recycling Sciences, Inc., a portfolio company,
merged with and into The Quantum Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation. The Quantum
Group, Inc. is a development stage company, which provides technology for
recycling vehicular tires. As a result of the merger, Quantum acquired the
worldwide license to a technology for a method of reclamation of
scrap-vulcanized rubber using supercritical fluids. The Quantum Group, Inc. is
a public company with shares traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board. We
own 931,000 shares of common stock of The Quantum Group, Inc. which represents
approximately 9% of the total issued and outstanding shares at June 30, 2000.
Investment Advisory Services
The value of the securities that we receive in exchange for our portfolio
companies is determined by an outside, independent financial advisor. We have
retained Bolten Financial Consulting, Inc., 6605 Mid Place, Temple Terrace,
Florida 33617 to provide us with valuations of the securities we receive in
exchange for portfolio companies, updated to each quarterly valuation date. We
pay Bolten Financial Consulting, Inc. a fee each time it values our
investments. In 1999, we paid Bolten Financial Consulting, Inc. a total of
$25,166 for valuations.
Advisory Councils
In addition to our Scientific Advisory Council, we have assembled a
European Advisory Council for the purpose of developing business in Europe for
us. It is our intention to expand both Councils, as and when appropriate, to
more completely represent our interests and needs in the near future.
Our European Advisory Council consists of the following members:
Carl Nisser, LL.M., D.E.S. (Chairman European Advisory Council and one of our
directors). Mr. Nisser was educated at the universities of Uppsala, Strassbourg
and Coimbra. He is a member of the Swedish Bar Association, Former Assistant
Judge of the Appellate Court of Stockholm, Former Director of Corporate and
Legal Affairs for AB Volvo, Former Director of Corporate Affairs for Goodyear
International Corporation, VP of Intermatrix Group, and currently Principal of
Advokatfirman Nisser (Law firm with offices in Brussels and London). Mr. Nisser
is Chairman and CEO of Ecom Enterprises and is on the board of directors of
several companies in the United States and Europe. He has authored several
articles on legal and economic issues.
Bo Hjelt. Mr. Hjelt was educated at Indiana University, Geneva University
(HEC), and IMI Geneva (MBA). He is the Chairman of Corporate Development
International, which he founded in 1973. Mr. Hjelt is also the member of
several boards of directors, and serves on the Board of the International
Federation for Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida.
Lord Chesham. Lord Chesham was educated at Eton College, Qualified Chartered
Accountant. He was the Former Finance Director of Bowater Corporation of
Australia. He was appointed Deputy Chief Whip of the House of Lords, 1995-97.
Professor Marcel Crochet, PhD. Professor Crochet was educated at the University
of Louvain and the University of California at Berkeley. He was appointed
Rector of the Catholic University of Louvain in 1995. Prior to this he served
as Chairman of the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Dean of Engineering
at
30
<PAGE>
the University of Louvain. Professor Crochet is the author of 140 scientific
publications in the field of fluid mechanics and is on the editorial board of
several scientific journals. Dr. Crochet has also served as the chief executive
officer of POLYFLOW Corporation. He has received numerous international awards
recognizing his work in technology innovation.
Dr. Jonas Lonnroth. Dr. Lonnroth was educated at Davidson College, N.C. and at
the medical facility of the University of Uppsala, Sweden. He completed studies
in Russian and law, and is a specialist in ear, nose and throat surgery. Dr.
Lonnroth speaks eight languages, and holds a patent in compass technology.
Lupold von Wedel. Mr. von Wedel was educated in Paris at the Institut des
Hautes Etudes Internationales and studied law at Freiburg University. He began
his business career with Hoechst AG as regional manager. Currently Mr. von
Wedel is managing director of Logika AG, a diversified services firm which
provides senior management support to industry.
Properties
Our executive offices are located at 202 South Wheeler Street, Plant City,
Florida, where we lease approximately 2,700 sq. feet of space with an annual
rent of $18,993. The lease will expire on March 31, 2002. We anticipate that
this space will be sufficient to address our needs for the foreseeable future.
Portfolio Companies
As of the date of this prospectus, each of our investments in our
portfolio companies were for amounts less than 5% of our total assets. We have
controlling interests in each of our portfolio companies and members of our
management also serve as officers and directors of each portfolio company. The
principal place of business of each portfolio company is located at our
executive offices at 202 South Wheeler Street, Plant City, Florida. In addition
to our investment, we provide portfolio companies with managerial assistance in
completing technology transfers. We have not made loans to any of our portfolio
companies. The following is a list of our current portfolio companies with a
brief description of their business:
Microsphere Technologies, Inc. is a development stage company that is
currently seeking to acquire licenses to new materials science technologies. We
own 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Microsphere
Technologies, Inc., which we acquired for $5,000. Uwe Reischl is the sole
director of Microsphere Technologies.
Technology Development, Inc. is a development stage company that is
seeking to acquire new computer modeling and related technologies. We own 100%
of the common stock of Technology Development, Inc., for which we paid $150.
Clifford M. Gross is the sole director and president of Technology Development,
Inc.
Advanced Desalination Technologies, Inc. is a development stage company
that is seeking to acquire a water desalination technology. We own 100% of the
common stock of Advanced Desalination Technologies, Inc., for which we paid
$150. Uwe Reischl is the sole director and president of Advanced Desalination
Technologies, Inc.
Doppler Tomography International, Inc. is a development stage company that
is seeking to acquire new technologies for the non-invasive analysis of body
tissue. We have invested $750 in Doppler Tomography to date. We own 100% of the
common stock of Doppler Tomography. Uwe Reischl is the sole director and
president of Doppler Tomography.
XGR Imaging, Inc., is a development stage company that is currently
seeking to acquire licenses to new imaging technologies. We own 100% of the
issued and outstanding common stock of XGR Imaging, Inc. Uwe Reischl is the
sole director of XGR Imaging, Inc.
Advanced Measurement Systems, Inc., is a development stage company that is
currently seeking to acquire licenses to new surface measurement technologies.
We own 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Advanced Measurement
Systems, Inc. Uwe Reischl is the sole director of Advanced Measurement Systems,
Inc.
31
<PAGE>
Advanced Surface Measurement, Inc., is a development stage company that is
currently seeking to acquire licenses to new surface analysis technologies. We
own 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Advanced Surface
Measurement, Inc. Uwe Reischl is the sole director of Advanced Surface
Measurement, Inc.
Voice Tech Worldwide, Inc., is a development stage company that has
acquired a license to a proprietary process technology that acts as a
voice-mail to e-mail agent providing access to multiple heterogeneous
voice-mail systems. In the event that we sell Voicetech Worldwide, Inc. we are
required to issue 49% of its issued and outstanding stock to Stanford
University. Uwe Reischl is the sole director and president of Voice Tech
Worldwide, Inc. If Voice Tech Worldwide, Inc. is not sold by October 31, 2000,
all license rights will revert to Stanford University.
Universal Keypad, Inc., is a development stage company that has acquired a
license to a proprietary technology that acts to enhance the ease-of-use of
keypads. We own 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Universal
Keypad, Inc. Uwe Reischl is the sole director and president of Universal
Keypad, Inc. If Universal Keypad, Inc. is not sold by November 3, 2000, all
license rights to the technology will revert to the inventor.
All of the foregoing portfolio companies are privately-held and are valued
at our cost, which our board of directors has determined to be fair market
value and to be equal to our purchase price for their common stock.
Employees
As of the date of this prospectus, we had five full-time employees and 26
consulting associates. Of these employees and associates, three are senior
executives. Our employees and associates are not represented by a labor union.
We consider relations with our employees and associates to be good.
Legal Proceedings
We have received a subpoena from the SEC's Division of Enforcement in
connection with an investigation that involves Lexon, Inc. We own 924,973
shares of Lexon. We have received no further information regarding the nature
of this investigation. As a result we cannot presently assess the marketability
or significance of any potential legal proceedings, liabilities of Lexon or
other risks or uncertainties that may result, including any adverse effect on
the trading price of Lexon common stock that we own.
We are not currently a party to any legal proceeding.
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
We determine the net asset value per share of our common stock quarterly.
The net asset value per share of common stock is equal to the value of our
total assets minus total liabilities and preferred stock divided by the total
number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Our board of directors has the responsibility for determining the fair
market value of the public and private equity securities that we receive from
companies that acquire our portfolio companies. Our board has selected an
independent appraiser, upon which it has determined to rely for a valuation of
these securities and to assist it in its determination of their fair market
value. With respect to private equity securities, each investment is valued
using industry valuation benchmarks, and then the value is assigned a discount
reflecting the illiquid nature of the investment as well as our minority,
non-control position. When an external event such as a purchase transaction,
public offering, or subsequent equity sale occurs, the pricing indicated by the
external event is used to corroborate our private equity valuation. Equity
securities in public companies that carry certain restrictions on sale are
generally valued at a discount from the public market value of the securities.
Restricted and unrestricted publicly traded stocks may also be valued at
discounts due to the size of our investment or market liquidity concerns.
32
<PAGE>
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The capital stock we receive from portfolio companies is expected to be
acquired primarily in private transactions negotiated directly with the
portfolio company or an affiliate. Our management will continue to be
principally responsible for conducting negotiations with respect to our
investments in portfolio companies.
In addition to securities of public companies that we receive as a result
of mergers by our portfolio companies, we may invest a portion of our other
assets in the publicly traded securities of public companies. Such investments
and other investments that are not "qualifying assets" may not exceed 30% of
the value of our total assets at the time of any such investment.
Based on the amount of existing available funds together with the proceeds
from this offering, it is not likely that we will be able to acquire securities
in a large number of companies. As a result, our investments will not be
substantially diversified. Furthermore, the technologies which our portfolio
companies acquire have been, and are expected to be, sold primarily to early
stage and other smaller public companies. Accordingly, the securities we
receive upon the merger of our portfolio companies will not be diversified
among companies at various stages of development and we will not derive the
benefits which may arise from making multi-tiered investments.
REGULATION
We have elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC,
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which we refer to as the 1940 Act. A
BDC is a special type of closed-end, non-diversified investment company
registered under and regulated by the 1940 Act. The Small Business Investment
Incentive Act of 1980 (which we refer to as the Incentive Act) modified the
provisions of the 1940 Act applicable to a BDC. After filing its election to be
treated as a BDC, a company may not withdraw its election without first
obtaining the approval of holders of a majority of its outstanding voting
securities (as defined under the 1940 Act). The following is a brief
description of certain provisions of the 1940 Act, as modified by the Incentive
Act, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 1940
Act, the Incentive Act and the rules thereunder.
Generally, to be eligible to elect BDC status, a company must engage in
the business of furnishing capital and significant managerial assistance to
companies which do not have ready access to capital through conventional
financial channels. Such portfolio companies are termed "eligible portfolio
companies." More specifically, in order to qualify as a BDC, a company must (i)
be a domestic company; (ii) have registered a class of its equity securities or
have filed a registration statement with the Commission pursuant to Section 12
of the Exchange Act; (iii) operate for the purpose of investing in the
securities of certain types of portfolio companies, namely, development stage
or emerging companies and businesses suffering or just recovering from
financial distress; (iv) extend significant managerial assistance generally to
such portfolio companies; (v) have a majority of directors who are not
"interested persons" (as defined in the 1940 Act), and (vi) file (or, under
certain circumstances, intend to file) a proper notice of election with the
Commission.
An eligible portfolio company is generally a company in the United States
that is not an investment company and that (i) does not have a class of
securities registered on an exchange or included in the Federal Reserve Board's
over-the-counter margin list; (ii) is actively controlled by a BDC and has an
affiliate of a BDC on its board of directors; or (iii) meets such other
criteria as may be established by the Commission. Control under the 1940 Act is
presumed to exist where a BDC beneficially owns more than 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company.
The 1940 Act prohibits or restricts companies subject to the 1940 Act from
investing in certain types of companies, such as brokerage firms, insurance
companies, investment banking firms and investment companies. Moreover, the
1940 Act limits the type of assets that BDCs may acquire to certain prescribed
qualifying assets and certain assets necessary for its operations (such as
office furniture, equipment and facilities) if, at the time of acquisition,
less than 70% of the value of the BDC's assets consists of qualifying assets.
Qualifying assets include:
o privately acquired securities of companies that were eligible portfolio
companies at the time such BDC acquired their securities;
o securities of bankrupt or insolvent companies;
o securities of eligible portfolio companies controlled by a BDC;
33
<PAGE>
o securities received in exchange for or distributed in or with respect to
any of the foregoing, and
o cash items, government securities and high-quality short-term debt.
The 1940 Act also places restrictions on the nature of the transactions in
which, and the persons from whom, securities can be purchased in order for the
securities to be considered qualifying assets. Such restrictions include
limiting purchases to transactions not involving a public offering and
acquiring securities directly from either the portfolio company or their
officers, directors or affiliates.
We are permitted by the 1940 Act, under specified conditions, to issue
multiple classes of senior debt and a single class of preferred stock if our
asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after the issuance
of the debt or the preferred stock (i.e., such senior securities may not be in
excess of 50% of our net assets). If the value of our net assets, as defined,
were to increase through the issuance of additional capital stock or otherwise,
we would be permitted under the 1940 Act to issue additional senior securities.
We have no senior securities outstanding and have no current intention of
issuing any senior securities although we may do so in the future.
We may sell our securities at a price that is below the net asset value
per share only (i) after a majority of our disinterested directors has
determined that such a sale would be in our best interests and the best
interests of our stockholders, and (ii) upon the approval by the holders of a
majority of our outstanding voting securities, including a majority of the
voting securities held by non-affiliated persons, of such a policy or practice
within one year prior to such sale. If the offering of the securities is
underwritten, a majority of the disinterested directors must determine in good
faith that the price of the securities being sold is not less than a price
which closely approximates the market value of the securities, less any
distribution discounts or commissions. As defined in the 1940 Act, the phrase
"majority of our outstanding voting securities" means the vote of (i) 67% or
more of our common stock present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50%
of our outstanding common stock are present or represented by proxy, or (ii)
more than 50% of our outstanding common stock, whichever is less.
Many of our transactions with our affiliates (as well as affiliates of
those affiliates) which were prohibited without the prior approval of the SEC
under the 1940 Act prior to its amendment by the Incentive Act are now
permissible upon the prior approval of a majority of our disinterested
directors and a majority of the directors having no financial interest in the
transactions. However, certain transactions involving certain persons with whom
we are associated, including our directors, officers, and employees, may still
require the prior approval of the SEC. In general:
o any person who owns, controls or holds power to vote more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock;
o any director, executive officer or general partner of that person; and
o any person who directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is
under common control with, that person,
must obtain the prior approval of a majority of our disinterested
directors and, in some situations, the prior approval of the SEC, before
engaging in certain transactions involving us or any company under our control.
The 1940 Act generally does not restrict transactions between a company and its
portfolio companies.
While a BDC may change the nature of its business so as to cease being a
BDC or, under certain circumstances, to change its business purpose, it may do
so only if authorized by a majority vote (as defined in the 1940 Act) of its
outstanding voting securities: stockholder approval of changes in other
fundamental investment policies of a BDC is not required (in contrast to the
general 1940 Act requirement, which requires stockholder approval for a change
in any fundamental investment policy). We are entitled to change our
non-diversification status without stockholder approval. Should we lose our
status as a BDC, we would become subject to more stringent regulation under the
1940 Act if we did not become exempt from 1940 Act regulation.
34
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
Our board of directors supervises the management of our company. The
responsibilities of each director include, among other things, the oversight of
the investment process, quarterly valuations of our assets and our financing
arrangements.
The following table contains certain information concerning our directors,
director nominees, officers and other key employees and their ages.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Positions Held Principal Occupation(s)
Name, Address and Age* With Registrant During Past Five Years**
---------------------- --------------- ------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Clifford M. Gross, age 43*** Chief Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Professor
Directors
Uwe Reischl, age 55 President Scientific advisor, Professor
Carole R. Mason, age 39 Chief Financial Officer Certified public accountant
Sam Reiber, age 53*** General Counsel and Director Attorney
Stuart M. Brooks, age 64 Director of Scientific Advisory Professor
Board and Director
Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong, age 51 Director Professor
Arthur Chapnik, age 60 Director President of apparel design and
marketing company
Carl Nisser, age 60 Director Attorney
David Michael, age 63 Director Certified public accountant
</TABLE>
* The address for all named individuals is c/o UTEK Corporation, 202 South
Wheeler Street, Plant City, Florida 33566.
** Such occupations are in addition to the individuals' positions with us.
*** Such persons are deemed to be interested persons under the 1940 Act.
Directors and Executive Officers
Clifford M. Gross, Ph.D. has served as our Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1997. Dr. Gross received his Ph.D.
from New York University in 1981, and from 1982 to 1984 Dr. Gross served as the
Acting Director of the Graduate Program in Ergonomics and Biomechanics at New
York University. From 1984 to 1985 Dr. Gross served as the Chairman of the
Department of Biomechanics at New York Institute of Technology. In 1985, Dr.
Gross founded and served as CEO of the Biomechanics Corp. of America until
1995. From 1996 to 1997, Dr. Gross served as a research professor and Director
of the Center for Product Ergonomics at University of South Florida. Dr. Gross
holds 18 patents and has authored numerous publications. His first book,
entitled "The Right Fit," describes how companies can increase market-share and
profitability using a biomechanics technology strategy. The current book that
he has co-authored with Dr. Uwe Reischl and Paul Abercrombie, entitled "The New
Idea Factory," outlines a new U2B(TM) model for using university-developed
technology to rapidly expand the intellectual capital of technology companies.
A system from his laboratory was replicated in the Cooper Hewitt National
Museum of Design -- Smithsonian Institution in March 1997 as part of a new
exhibit on Henry Dryfuss and ergonomics.
Uwe Reischl, Ph.D., M.D. has served as our President since June 1999 and
was our Executive Vice President from September 1998 until June 1999. Dr.
Reischl received a Masters degree in Architecture from the University of
California at Berkeley, he received a Ph.D. degree in Environmental Health
Sciences from the University of California at Berkeley, and both a second Ph.D.
in Occupational Medicine and an M.D. in General Medicine from the University of
Ulm (Ulm, Germany). Prior to joining UTEK, Dr. Reischl served as a Scientific
Advisor at the World Health Organization (WHO) Center at the University of Ulm.
Dr. Reischl was an Assistant Professor at the University of California,
Director of the Program in Industrial Health and Safety at Oakland University,
and he was an Associate Professor at the College of Public Health, University
of South Florida. Dr. Reischl has 15 years experience in university teaching
and research.
35
<PAGE>
Carole R. Mason, C.P.A., has served as our Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer since June 1999. From 1987 to the present, Ms. Mason
has also been a partner of Myers, Mason & Co. Ms. Mason has conducted a
diversified accounting practice in Tampa, Florida for 15 years. She received
her Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Tampa.
Sam Reiber, J.D., has served as our General Counsel since 1997 and has
been a Director since May 1998. Mr. Reiber was a founding partner of Linsky and
Reiber, a law firm located in Tampa, Florida. Mr. Reiber has conducted a
diversified practice of law in Tampa for 25 years. Mr. Reiber's practice
includes all types of real property, corporate matters, litigation and estate
planning. He received a Bachelor's degree in economics from the University of
Minnesota in 1969 and a Juris Doctorate from the William Mitchell College of
Law in 1974.
Stuart M. Brooks, M.D. has served as a director since 1998 and has been
the director of our Scientific Advisory Board since 1998. He is a Professor of
Medicine and Public Health and Director of the NIOSH Educational and Research
Center at USF.
Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong, Ph.D. has served as a director since May 1998.
Between May 1998 and December 1998, Dr. Gyimah-Brempong served as our Director
of University Partnerships, and as such was responsible for helping us to build
relationships with American universities. Since 1994 to the present, Dr.
Gyimah-Brempong has been a Professor of Economics at the University of South
Florida School of Business. Dr. Gyimah-Brempong recently completed a
comprehensive report on how American universities market their technology.
Arthur Chapnik has served as a director since May 1998. Mr. Chapnik is
also the President of Harrison McJade & Co., Ltd., an apparel design and
marketing company. Mr. Chapnik served as president of Samsung USA's women's
apparel division from 1988 to 1990. Mr. Chapnik is Dr. Gross' father-in-law.
Carl Nisser, LL.M., D.E.S., has served as a director and chairman of our
European Advisory Counsel since May 1998. Mr. Nisser is a principal of
Advokatfirman Nisser, with offices in Brussels, London and New York. He has
served as Director of Corporate and Legal Affairs for both Volvo and Goodyear
International Corporation in the U.S., Europe and the Far East. Mr. Nisser also
serves in an of counsel capacity with our counsel, Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz,
LLP. Mr. Nisser was educated at the universities of Uppsala, Strassbourg and
Coimbra. Mr. Nisser is chairman and CEO of E.com Enterprises, Inc. and a member
of several boards of directors. He is also an author of several articles on
legal and economic issues.
David Michael, CPA has served as a director since February 2000. Since
1983, Mr. Michael has served as the president of David Michael & Co., P.C., an
accounting firm. He also serves on the board of directors of Del Global
Technologies Corp. (NASDAQ:DGTC). Mr. Michael received a BBA in accounting from
City College in New York in 1959.
Committees of the Board
Our board of directors has established an Audit Committee and a
Compensation Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are David Michael,
Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong and Stuart Brooks. The functions of the Audit Committee
will be to annually recommend to the board of directors the appointment of our
independent public accountants, discuss and review the scope and fees of the
prospective annual audit, review the results thereof with the independent
public accountants, review and approve non-audit services of the independent
public accountants, review compliance with existing major accounting and
financial policies relative to the adequacy of our internal accounting
controls, review compliance with federal and state laws relating to accounting
practices and review and approve transactions, if any, with affiliated parties.
The members of the Compensation Committee are Stuart Brooks, Sam Reiber
and Arthur Chapnik. The functions of the Compensation Committee will be to
review and approve annual salaries and bonuses for all officers, review,
approve, and recommend to the board of directors the terms and conditions of
any employee benefit plans or changes thereto, administer our stock option
plan, and carry out the responsibilities required by rules of the SEC.
36
<PAGE>
Compensation of Directors
We have issued shares of our common stock to our directors as compensation
for acting in such capacity and we intend to grant our directors options to
purchase shares of our common stock in compensation for their services. We have
not paid any cash compensation to any of our directors. We are currently
reviewing our policy on compensation of outside directors and may pay outside
directors a cash honorarium in the future.
Consulting Agreements with Directors
We retain or have previously retained certain of our directors to serve as
independent contractors pursuant to consulting agreements under which these
persons were generally paid in shares, which vest over a two-year period,
rather than salaries. The directors with whom we have consulting relationships
are listed below:
As part of his board duties, Stuart Brooks, M.D. had been retained to
serve as Director of the Scientific Advisory Board. Pursuant to the agreement,
we have issued to Dr. Brooks, in consideration for his services, 5,000 shares
of our common stock.
As part of his board duties, Arthur Chapnik had previously served as
Director of Public Relations. Pursuant to the agreement, we have issued to Mr.
Chapnik, in consideration for his services, 5,000 shares of our common stock.
As part of his board duties, Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong, Ph.D. had previously
served as Director of University Partnerships. Pursuant to the agreement, we
have issued to Dr. Gyimah-Brempong, in consideration for his services, 5,000
shares of our common stock.
Carl Nisser has previously served as Director of European Licensing.
Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Nisser will represent us in Europe, and in
consideration for his services we issued to Mr. Nisser 10,000 shares of our
common stock in two equal installments, 5,000 shares in 1998 and 5,000 shares
in 1999. In addition, we paid Mr. Nisser in cash for legal services rendered to
us as director of our European Advisory Council.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information regarding compensation
paid by us during each of the last three fiscal years to our Chief Executive
Officer who was our sole executive officer to have earned in excess of $60,000
for any year.
Summary Compensation Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Aggregate Annual Pension or Estimated Total Compensation
Compensation Retirement Benefits Annual From Fund and
------------------- Accrued as Part of Benefits Upon Fund Complex
Name and Principal Position Year Total Fund Expenses Retirement Paid to Investors
--------------------------- ---- ----- ------------- ---------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Clifford M. Gross, 1999 $120,400 -- -- --
Chief Executive Officer 1998 $ 18,000 -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
Employment Agreements
We have entered into five-year employment agreements, effective September
1, 1999, with Dr. Clifford M. Gross and Dr. Uwe Reischl. Drs. Gross and Reischl
have agreed to serve as our Chief Executive Officer and President. Dr. Gross
will receive an annual base salary of $150,000 and Dr. Reischl will receive an
annual base salary of $100,000. Upon completion of this offering, we will grant
to Drs. Gross and Reischl incentive stock options to purchase up to 100,000 and
50,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, both Drs. Gross and Reischl
will receive an automobile allowance. Pursuant to their employment agreements
with us, Dr. Gross and Dr. Reischl have agreed to devote substantially all of
their time and attention to the business and affairs of our company. Each
employment agreement contains a covenant not to compete with us for a one-year
period immediately following termination of employment.
We have engaged Carole Mason, C.P.A. to serve as our Chief Financial
Officer. However, we will not have the benefit of her services on a full time
basis as she has other duties at Myers, Mason & Co., P.A. Following this
offering, we anticipate that Ms. Mason will become a full-time employee or we
will seek to hire a qualified full-time chief financial officer.
37
<PAGE>
Key Man Life Insurance
We have obtained "key man" life insurance policies in the amount of
$500,000 on the life of each of Clifford M. Gross, our Chief Executive Officer,
and Uwe Reischl, our President.
Stock Option Plans
Our stockholders have adopted two employee stock option plans, an
incentive stock option plan adopted in September 1999 (the "1999 Plan") and a
non-qualified stock option plan adopted in February 2000 (the "2000 Plan").
The purpose of the 1999 Plan is to enable us to compete successfully in
attracting, motivating and retaining employees with outstanding abilities. The
options are intended to be Incentive Stock Options within the meaning of
section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Following the consummation of this
offering, the Compensation Committee will administer the 1999 Plan.
The 1999 Plan. Under the 1999 Plan, we are authorized to issue options to
purchase up to 500,000 shares of our common stock. All officers and other
employees who perform significant services for or on behalf of us are eligible
to participate in the 1999 Plan.
We may grant under the 1999 Plan both incentive stock options within the
meaning of Section 422 of the Code, and stock options that do not qualify for
incentive treatment under the Code.
The exercise price of each incentive stock option under the plan will be
determined by the Compensation Committee, but will be not less than 100% of the
current market value of the common stock on the date of grant (or 110% in the
case of an employee who at the time owns more than 10% of the total combined
voting power of all classes of capital stock). The non-qualified option
exercise price will be determined by the Compensation Committee, but will not
be less than 100% of the current market value of the common stock on the date
of grant.
The 2000 Plan. Under the 2000 Plan, we are authorized to issue options to
purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock. All officers and other
employees as well as other persons who perform significant services for or on
behalf of us are eligible to participate in the 2000 Plan.
We may grant under the 2000 Plan only stock options that do not qualify
for incentive treatment under Section 422 of the Code.
The exercise price for 2000 Plan options will be determined by the
Compensation Committee, but will not be less than 100% of the current market
value of the common stock on the date of grant.
General. In the discretion of the Compensation Committee and upon receipt
of all regulatory approvals, an option holder may be permitted to utilize a
cashless exercise as payment in whole or in part of the exercise price in
certificates for shares of common stock (valued for this purpose at its fair
market value on the day of exercise) or other property.
An incentive stock option shall expire ten years from the date it is
granted. The Compensation Committee may provide in the stock option agreement
that the option expires 30 days following the termination of employment for any
reason other than death or disability or 12 months following a termination of
employment for death or disability. In no event shall any option granted under
the plan be exercised after the expiration date of such option in the
applicable stock option agreement.
If the outstanding shares of common stock are changed into, or common
stock issuable under the plan exchanged for, cash or a different number or kind
of our shares or securities of another corporation through reorganization,
merger, recapitalization, stock split-up, reverse-stock split, stock dividend,
stock consolidation, stock combination, or similar transaction, an appropriate
adjustment will be made by the Compensation Committee in the number and kind of
shares as to which options may be granted. In the event of such change or
exchange, other than for shares or securities of another corporation or by
reason of reorganization, the Compensation Committee will also make a
corresponding adjustment in the number or kind of shares and the exercise price
per share allocated to unexercised options or portions thereof, of options
which have been
38
<PAGE>
granted prior to such change. Any such adjustment, however, will be made
without change in the total price applicable to the unexercised portion of the
option but with a corresponding adjustment in the price for each share (except
for any change in the aggregate price resulting from rounding off of share
quantities or prices).
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
The following table sets forth certain information, as of the date hereof,
and as adjusted to give effect to the offering and the transactions
contemplated thereby, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the common
stock by (i) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) each of our executive officers and
directors, and (iii) all our executive officers and directors as a group:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percentage
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
of -------------------------
Name and Address of Common Stock Before After
Beneficial Owner(1) Beneficially Owned Offering Offering(2)
------------------- ------------------ -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Clifford M. Gross(3) ............... 1,962,254 69.9% 51.5%
Carl Nisser(4) ..................... 72,500 2.6 1.9
Uwe Reischl(4) ..................... 55,500 2.0 1.5
Sam Reiber(5) ...................... 23,550 0.8 0.6
Stuart Brooks(6) ................... 18,750 0.7 0.5
Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong(6) ......... 18,750 0.7 0.5
Arthur Chapnik(6) .................. 18,750 0.7 0.5
Carole R. Mason(7) ................. 17,750 0.6 0.4
David Michael(8) ................... 6,250 0.2 0.2
--------- ----- -----
All directors and executive officers
as a group consisting of nine
persons ........................... 2,194,054 78.2% 57.6%
========= ===== =====
</TABLE>
------------
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is our
address.
(2) The percentages of shares beneficially owned after the offering have been
calculated assuming that the underwriter has not exercised its
over-allotment option.
(3) The shares of common stock are held by Clifford M. Gross and his wife
jointly. Includes 25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus.
(4) Includes 12,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus.
(5) Includes 12,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus, and 3,050
shares of common stock held in the name of Linsky & Reiber.
(6) Includes 6,250 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus.
(7) The shares of common stock are held in the name of Myers, Mason & Co., P.A.
Includes 3,750 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus.
(8) Includes 6,250 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options
exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus.
Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable
or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this prospectus are deemed to be
outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options for
the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person but are not
treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of
any other person.
39
<PAGE>
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Transactions with UTEK
In September 2000 we secured a line of credit for $150,000 from a
financial institution. Clifford M. Gross, our chief executive officer and Sam
Reiber, one of our directors, personally guaranteed our obligation under this
line of credit. Neither Dr. Gross nor Mr. Reiber received any compensation for
this guarantee.
Carl Nisser, one of our directors, is also associated with our counsel,
Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz, LLP, with whom he serves in an of counsel
capacity. In addition, in connection with this offering, Mr. Nisser will
receive approximately 30% of the fees payable to Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz,
LLP.
INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES
We are internally managed by our officers under the supervision of our
board of directors. We therefore have no investment advisory, administrative or
similar agreements with any person or entity.
We serve as our own custodian in accordance with the provisions of the
Investment Company Act. We intend to store the certificates representing the
common stock we receive from acquirers of our portfolio companies in a safety
deposit box at Southtrust Bank, located at 202 S. Wheeler St., Plant City,
Florida. Securities in our portfolio companies are held in the custody and
control of Linsky & Reiber, Attorneys at Law, 601 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa,
Florida.
Decisions regarding investments in our portfolio companies are made
primarily by Clifford M. Gross, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors, Uwe Reischl, our President, and Carole R. Mason, our Chief
Financial Officer, subject to approval by our Board of Directors. Dr. Gross has
been responsible for our investments for approximately two years, Dr. Reischl
for approximately one and one-half years and Ms. Mason for approximately nine
months. See "Management -- Executive Officers and Directors" for a summary of
the business experience of Drs. Gross and Reischl and Ms. Mason during the past
five years. The firm of Linsky & Reiber, attorneys at law, of which Sam Reiber,
our General Counsel and a Director, is a partner, currently serves as our
custodian, transfer agent and dividend paying agent. Linsky & Reiber is located
at 601 E. Twiggs Street, Tampa, Florida 33602. Following the offering, we
expect those services to be conducted by our transfer agent, Computershare
Trust Company, Inc., 12039 W. Alameda Parkway, Suite Z-2, Lakewood, Colorado
80228.
We expect that expenses relating to our formation and costs relating to
the portfolio companies that we will be amortized on a straight line basis over
a period of 60 months. The costs associated with the initial formation and
operation of our portfolio companies may include obligations of the portfolio
companies to us, including management and administrative fees.
The transfer agent for our common stock is Computershare Trust Company,
Inc., 12039 W. Alameda Parkway, Suite Z-2, Lakewood, Colorado 80228.
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in portfolio
companies in privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers in
the normal course of business.
When we sell the securities we receive in exchange for portfolio
companies, our management will arrange for the execution of such transactions
and the allocation of brokerage services and commissions. In executing
transactions in the securities we receive for portfolio companies, our
management will seek to obtain the most favorable execution, that is, the best
combination of net price and prompt, reliable execution. In management's
opinion it is not possible to determine in advance that any particular broker
will actually be able to effect the most favorable execution because, in the
context of an often changing market, order execution involves judgments as to
the price, volume, trend and breadth of the market, possibility of a block
transaction, and the broker's activity in the security as well as its general
record for prompt, competent and reliable service in all aspects of order
processing, execution and settlement as well as anticipated commission rates.
40
<PAGE>
A substantial portion of the securities that we receive in exchange for
our portfolio companies may be traded in the over-the-counter markets, and we
intend to deal directly with the dealers who make markets in the securities
involved, except in those circumstances where better price and execution are
otherwise available. Under the 1940 Act, persons affiliated with our company
are prohibited from dealing with us as principal in the purchase and sale of
securities. Transactions in the over-the-counter markets usually involve
transactions with dealers acting as principal for their own account. We will
not deal with affiliated persons as principal; however, affiliated persons of
our company may serve as our broker in over-the-counter markets and other
transactions conducted on an agency basis in accordance with the 1940 Act,
except that if an affiliated person is a market maker in the securities of a
company, then the affiliated person will not serve as our broker in the
purchase of such securities.
Our management has no obligation to deal with any broker or group of
brokers in the execution of transactions.
INCOME TAX MATTERS
For Federal and state income tax purposes, we are taxed at regular
corporate rates on ordinary income and recognize gains on distributions of
appreciated property. We are not entitled to the special tax treatment
available to most regulated investment companies because, among other reasons,
we do not distribute at least 90% of "investment company taxable income" as
required by the Code for such treatment. Distributions of cash or property by
us to our stockholders, if any, will be taxable as dividends only to the extent
that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits. Distributions in
excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated first as
a return of capital to the extent of the holder's tax basis and then as gain
from the sale or exchange of property.
Each investor is urged to consult with his or her tax advisor concerning
the Federal, state and local, and foreign tax consequences of an investment in
our company.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
Our total authorized capital stock consists of 19,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.01 per share. The following descriptions of capital stock are
qualified in all respects by reference to our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws, which were filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part.
Common Stock
The holders of common stock elect all directors and are entitled to one
vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted upon by
stockholders. As of the date of this prospectus, 2,782,226 shares of common
stock were issued and outstanding. Upon successful completion of this offering,
3,782,226 shares of common stock will be issued and outstanding. Subject to
preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding preferred stock, all
shares of common stock participate equally in dividends, when and as declared
by the Board of Directors and in net assets on liquidation. The shares of
common stock have no preference, conversion, exchange, preemptive or cumulative
voting rights.
Preferred Stock
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of shares of
preferred stock in one or more series. As of the date of the prospectus there
are no issued and outstanding shares of preferred stock, and no shares of
preferred stock will be issued and outstanding as a result of the offering. Our
Board of Directors has the authority, without any vote or action by our
stockholders, to create one or more series of preferred stock up to the limit
of our authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock and to fix the number
of shares constituting such series and the designation of such series, the
voting powers (if any) of the shares of such series and the relative,
participatory, option or other rights (if any), and any qualifications,
preferences, limitations or restrictions including, without limitation, the
dividend rate (and whether dividends are cumulative), conversion
41
<PAGE>
rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), and
redemption price and liquidation preferences, and any other rights, preferences
and limitations pertaining to such series which may be fixed by our Board of
Directors pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law.
For so long as we are subject to the 1940 Act, we are subject to
restrictions relating to the issuance of senior securities, including preferred
stock. We would generally be restricted from issuing preferred stock if,
immediately after issuance or sale, the preferred stock did not have an asset
coverage of at least 200 percent. For this purpose, the term "asset coverage,"
when applied to the preferred stock, generally means the ratio that the value
of our total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by the
preferred stock, bears to the involuntary liquidation preference of the
preferred stock (and certain other of our debt obligations). In addition, the
preferred stock would generally have the right to elect at least two directors
to the board and to elect a majority of the board in certain circumstances. The
preferred stock would have certain other voting and priority payment rights as
required by the 1940 Act.
Anti-Takeover Provisions Affecting Our Common Stock
Blank Check Preferred Stock
The existence of authorized but unissued preferred stock may enable our
Board of Directors to render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain
control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.
For example, if in the due exercise of its fiduciary obligations, our Board of
Directors were to determine that a takeover proposal is not in our best
interests, our Board of Directors could cause us to issue shares of preferred
stock without stockholder approval in one or more private offerings or other
transactions that might dilute the voting or other rights of the proposed
acquiror. In this regard, our certificate of incorporation grants the Board of
Directors broad power to establish the rights and preferences of authorized and
unissued preferred stock. The issuance of shares of preferred stock pursuant to
the Board of Directors' authority described above could decrease the amount of
earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of our common stock
and adversely affect the rights of such holders, including voting rights in the
event a particular series of preferred stock is given a disproportionately
large number of votes per share, and may have the effect of delaying, deferring
or preventing a change in control of us that may be favored by certain
stockholders. In addition, the use of preferred stock to prevent a takeover
could have the effect of depriving stockholders of an opportunity to sell their
common stock at a premium over the then-current market price.
Outstanding Securities
The following table lists our authorized and outstanding securities as of
June 30, 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount held by UTEK
Title of class Amount authorized for its own account Amount outstanding(1)
----------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
common stock 19,000,000 shares -- 2,782,226
preferred stock 1,000,000 shares -- --
</TABLE>
------------
(1) Does not include 100,000 shares of common stock issuable in the aggregate
on exercise of the representative's warrants.
The shares of our common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2000 were issued
in private transactions. On August 27, 1997, we issued a total of 1,950,000
shares, at a price of $.0146 per share, for net proceeds of $28,506. On May 14,
1998, we completed a private placement transaction by issuing 207,068 shares at
a price of $1.50 per share for aggregate net proceeds of $310,602. On July 25,
1998, we completed another private placement transaction and issued 96,400
shares at a price of $2.28 per share for aggregate net proceeds of $219,831. On
April 12, 1999, we completed a private placement transaction and issued 281,424
shares at a price of $4.64 per share for aggregate net proceeds of $1,305,807.
Stock issued for services includes:
Year Ended December 31, Shares Value
------------------------- --------- ----------
1997 166,334 $ 8,317
1998 34,600 86,550
1999 46,400 204,219
42
<PAGE>
Following the closing of this offering, there will be outstanding warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of our common stock. Warrants will be
issued upon payment of the purchase price of $.03 per warrant at the closing of
the offering to Schneider Securities, Inc., the representative of the
underwriters of our offering. The representative's warrants may be exercised
for shares of common stock in an aggregate amount equal to up to ten percent of
the shares issued in this offering. The representative's warrants will be
exercisable for a four year period beginning one year after the effective date
of this offering, at $9.90 per share which is 165% of the offering price of our
common stock. The exercise prices and the number of shares issuable upon
exercise of these warrants are subject to change if certain dilutive events
occur and the holders of these warrants have certain rights to have shares
acquired on exercise of the warrants registered under the Securities Act at our
expense.
Transfer Agent
The transfer agent for our common stock is Computershare Trust Company,
Inc., 12039 W. Alameda Parkway, Suite Z-2, Lakewood, Colorado 80228.
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an underwriting
agreement dated , 2000, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters named
below, for which Schneider Securities, Inc. is acting as the representative,
the following respective amounts of shares of common stock:
Underwriters Number of
------------ ---------
Shares
----------
Schneider Securities, Inc. .........
----------
Total .............................. 1,000,000
=========
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are obligated to
purchase all the shares of common stock in the offering if any are purchased,
other than those shares covered by the over-allotment option described below.
The underwriting agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the
offering of common stock may be terminated.
Schneider Securities, Inc. will act as representative of the underwriters
in offering the shares of common stock.
We have granted to the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to
150,000 additional shares at the initial public offering price less the
underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriters may exercise the
option only to cover any over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock initially at
the public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus and to selling
group members at that price less a concession of $. per share. The
underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount of $. per share
on sales to other broker/dealers. After the initial public offering, the public
offering price and concession and discount to broker/dealers may be changed by
the underwriters.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated expenses we
will pay.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Per Share Total
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Without With Without With
Over-allotment Over-allotment Over-allotment Over-allotment
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Underwriting discounts and
commissions paid by us ......... $ 0.60 $ 0.60 $600,000 $690,000
Expenses payable by us .......... $ 0.18 $ 0.18 $180,000 $207,000
</TABLE>
We will pay all of the expenses of the offering, which we estimate will be
approximately $475,000. In addition we will pay to the represenative of the
underwriters $180,000 for their expenses (excluding the sale of any
over-allotment shares). We previously paid $50,000 to another underwriter.
43
<PAGE>
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
We, our officers and directors and stockholders owning 97% of the common
stock outstanding prior to this offering have agreed to a 24-month "lock up"
covering all the shares of common stock and certain other securities
beneficially owned, including securities that are convertible or exchangeable
into or exercisable for shares of common stock.
In addition, for a two year period we will not issue any securities
without the consent of Schneider Securities, Inc., not including any shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of any securities currently outstanding or
which may be issued under the 1999 stock option plan or the 2000 stock option
plan. Schneider Securities, Inc. has agreed to not unreasonably withhold or
unduly delay its consent to the issuance of securities for acquisitions.
We and Schneider Securities, Inc. will enter into a financial consulting
agreement providing for Schneider Securities, Inc. to act as a management and
financial consultant to us for a three year period for a fee of $110,000
payable at the closing of this offering. Under this agreement, Schneider
Securities, Inc. will provide us with consulting services in connection with
its evaluation of our management, business operations and financing
opportunities, including prospective mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and
other business transactions.
We have granted Schneider Securities, Inc. for a period ending on ,
2005 the right to have a designee of Schneider Securities, Inc. present at
meetings of the Board of Directors and each of its committees subject to our
right to exclude such designee under certain circumstances. The designee will
be entitled to the same notices and communications sent by us as we give to our
directors and will attend directors' and committees' meetings, but will not be
entitled to vote. Such designee will also be entitled to receive the same
compensation payable to directors as independent members of the Board of
Directors and its committees and all reasonable expenses in attending such
meetings. As of the date of this prospectus no designee has been selected.
In connection with this offering, we have agreed to sell to the
representative of the underwriters, for a purchase price of $.03 per warrant,
warrants to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock. These warrants are
exercisable at $9.90 per share of common stock for a period of four years
beginning one year from the effective date of this offering. These warrants
contain antidilution provisions providing for adjustment of the exercise price
upon the occurrence of certain events, including (i) the issuance of common
stock, or securities exercisable or convertible into common stock, at a price
less than the exercise price and (ii) any recapitalization, reclassification,
stock dividend, stock split, stock combination or similar transaction. In
addition, the warrants grant to the holders rights, commencing on the date of
this prospectus, to have common stock issued on exercise of the warrants
registered under the Securities Act. These rights include the right to require
us to register these shares for a five year period and the right to include
these shares for a seven year period in any registration statement filed by us.
The represenative's warrants will be restricted from sale, transfer,
assignment or hypothecation for a period of one year from the effective date of
the offering except to officers or partners (not directors) of the underwriter
and members of the selling group and/or their officers or partners.
The underwriters may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing transactions,
syndicate covering transactions, penalty bids and "passive" market making in
accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
o Over-allotment involves syndicate sales in excess of the offering size,
which creates a syndicate short position.
o Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security
so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.
o Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in
the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to
cover syndicate short positions.
44
<PAGE>
o Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling concession
from a syndicate member when the shares of common stock originally sold by
such syndicate member are purchased in a syndicate covering transaction to
cover syndicate short positions.
o In "passive" market making, market makers of the common stock who are
underwriters or prospective underwriters may, subject to certain
limitations, make bids for or purchases of the common stock until the
time, if any, at which a stabilizing bid is made.
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty
bids may cause the price of the common stock to be higher than it would
otherwise be in the absence of these transactions. These transactions may be
effected on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be
discontinued at any time.
Market makers may buy or sell our shares of common stock in order to meet
the demand of those parties that want to trade in our common stock. The
underwriters of this offering may act as market makers for our common stock,
but are not obligated to be market makers. If the underwriters do not act as
market makers, you may have more difficulty executing either buy or sell
trades. In addition, there may be greater fluctuations in the price of our
common stock, and a relatively low amount of trading may significantly
adversely affect the market value of our shares.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares offered will be passed upon for us by Gersten,
Savage & Kaplowitz, LLP, 101 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022.
Certain legal matters in connection with the offering will be passed upon for
the underwriters by Berliner Zisser Walter & Gallegos, P.C. 1700 Lincoln
Street, Suite 4700, Denver, Colorado 80203.
EXPERTS
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, have audited our consolidated
financial statements at December 31, 1999 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1999, as set forth in their report. We have
included our financial statements in the prospectus and elsewhere in the
registration statement in reliance on Ernst & Young LLP's report, given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
CUSTODIAN
We will act as a self-custodian of our portfolio securities in compliance
with applicable regulations under the 1940 Act.
45
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules
Contents
Report of Independent Auditors ........................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets .............................. F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations .................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows .................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets ......... F-6
Financial Highlights ..................................... F-7
Schedule of Investments .................................. F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............... F-11
F-1
<PAGE>
Report of Independent Auditors
Board of Directors and Shareholders
UTEK Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of UTEK
Corporation, including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 1999
and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and
changes in net assets, and financial highlights for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial statements and
financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements and the financial highlights. Our procedures included the physical
inspection of securities owned as of December 31, 1999 and 1998. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and financial highlights
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of UTEK Corporation at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
consolidated results of its operations, its cash flows and changes in its net
assets and financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
February 8, 2000
F-2
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31
1999
December 31 December 31 Proforma June 30
1998 1999 (Note 4) 2000
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Investments in non-controlled affiliates (cost
$320,000, $1,418,212 and $3,124,684 at
December 31, 1998 and 1999 and June 30, 2000,
respectively) ......................................... $ 1,300,000 $ 2,594,931 $ 2,594,931 $ 4,542,896
Cash and cash equivalents .............................. 418,178 1,007,229 1,007,229 91,735
Prepaid expenses and other assets ...................... 22,760 522,447 522,447 914,403
Fixed assets, net ...................................... 64,857 80,738 80,738 82,214
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
TOTAL ASSETS ....................................... 1,805,795 4,205,345 4,205,345 $ 5,631,248
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses ....................................... 8,698 114,453 114,453 324,620
Deferred income taxes .................................. 431,450 806,439 727,645 (a) 1,264,768
------------ ------------ ------------- -----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES .................................. 440,148 920,892 842,098 1,589,388
------------ ------------ ------------- -----------
NET ASSETS ......................................... $ 1,365,647 $ 3,284,453 $ 3,363,247 $ 4,041,860
============ ============ ============= ===========
Commitments and Contingencies
Composition of net assets
Common stock, $.01 par value, 19,000,000 shares
authorized; 2,454,402, 2,782,226 and 2,782,226
shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
1998 and 1999 and June 30, 2000, respectively ......... $ 24,544 $ 27,822 $ 27,822 $ 27,822
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized and none issued and outstanding ............ -- -- -- --
Additional paid-in capital ............................. 629,262 2,136,010 2,136,010 2,136,010
Accumulated income:
Accumulated net operating income ...................... 100,841 386,702 514,145(a) 993,488
Net unrealized appreciation of investments, net of
deferred income taxes (Note 4) ...................... 611,000 733,919 685,270(a) 884,540
------------ ------------ ------------- -----------
Net assets ............................................. $ 1,365,647 $ 3,284,453 $ 3,363,247 $ 4,041,860
============ ============ ============= ===========
Net asset value per share .............................. $ 0.56 $ 1.18 $ 1.21 $ 1.45
============ ============ ============= ===========
</TABLE>
------------
(a) Reflects the unaudited pro forma impact on the Company's financial position
had it been taxable as a "C Corporation" (see Note 4).
See accompanying notes.
F-3
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31 Six Months Ended June 30
------------------------------------------ ----------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income from operations: ............................
Sale of technology rights ......................... $ -- $ 320,000 $1,098,212 $ 872,492 $1,906,472
Consulting fees ................................... 55,000 165,000 43,214 --
Interest income, net .............................. -- 6,843 52,161 18,346 17,160
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
-- 381,843 1,315,373 934,052 1,923,632
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Expenses:
Salaries and wages ................................ -- 27,275 197,125 76,695 163,295
Professional fees ................................. -- 3,934 184,697 57,321 100,970
Sales and marketing ............................... -- 65,649 79,544 53,905 525,303
General and administrative ........................ 5,115 116,579 266,956 234,965 159,822
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
5,115 213,437 728,322 422,886 949,390
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes .................. (5,115) 168,406 587,051 511,166 974,242
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 4) ...... -- 62,450 301,190 (112,982) 367,456
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) from operations ............... (5,115) 105,956 285,861 624,148 606,786
Net realized and unrealized gains:
Increase in unrealized appreciation of
non-controlled affiliate investments, net of
deferred income tax expense of $369,000, and
$73,800, at December 31, 1998 and 1999, and
$90,872 and $365,000 at June 30, 1999 and
2000, respectively (Note 4) ..................... -- 611,000 122,919 605,000 150,621
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets. ............. $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 408,780 $1,229,148 $ 757,407
========= ========= ========== ========== ==========
Unaudited pro forma information:
Net increase (decrease) in net assets before pro
forma effect of change in Company's tax
structure. ........................................ $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 408,780 $1,229,148 $ 757,407
Pro forma effect of change in tax structure ........ -- -- 78,794 (306,618) --
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Pro forma increase in net assets. .................. $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 487,574 $ 922,530 $ 757,407
========= ========= ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-4
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31
--------------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
------------- ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating activities:
Net increase (decrease) in net assets ................... $ (5,115) $ 716,956 $ 408,780
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in
net assets to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Increase in net unrealized appreciation of
investments .......................................... -- (980,000) (196,719)
Deferred income taxes .................................. -- 431,450 374,989
Services received for common stock ..................... 8,317 86,550 204,219
Depreciation and amortization .......................... 197 4,181 14,046
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: ...........
Prepaid expenses and other assets ..................... (31,766) 8,809 (499,687)
Accrued expenses ...................................... -- 8,698 105,755
--------- ---------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ..... (28,367) 276,644 411,383
--------- ---------- ------------
Investing activities:
Investment securities received for sale of
portfolio companies .................................... -- (320,000) (1,098,212)
Purchases of fixed assets ............................... -- (69,038) (29,927)
--------- ---------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities ................... -- (389,038) (1,128,139)
--------- ---------- ------------
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuances of common stock ................. 28,506 530,433 1,305,807
--------- ---------- ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities ............... 28,506 530,433 1,305,807
--------- ---------- ------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ........ 139 418,039 589,051
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period ........ -- 139 418,178
--------- ---------- ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period .............. $ 139 $ 418,178 $ 1,007,229
========= ========== ============
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended June 30
------------------------------
1999 2000
------------- ---------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Operating activities:
Net increase (decrease) in net assets ................... $1,229,148 $ 757,407
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in
net assets to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Increase in net unrealized appreciation of
investments .......................................... (695,873) (515,620)
Deferred income taxes .................................. (22,109) 732,456
Services received for common stock ..................... 204,219 --
Depreciation and amortization .......................... 6,297 9,580
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: ...........
Prepaid expenses and other assets ..................... (64,444) (391,956)
Accrued expenses ...................................... 131,325 210,167
---------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ..... 788,563 802,034
---------- -------------
Investing activities:
Investment securities received for sale of
portfolio companies .................................... (872,492) (1,706,472)
Purchases of fixed assets ............................... (2,858) (11,056)
---------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities ................... (875,350) (1,717,528)
---------- -------------
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuances of common stock ................. 1,305,807 --
---------- -------------
Net cash provided by financing activities ............... 1,305,807 --
---------- -------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ........ 1,219,020 (915,494)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period ........ 418,178 1,007,229
---------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period .............. $1,637,198 $ 91,735
========== =============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-5
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31
------------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
------------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Changes in net assets from operations:
Net income (loss) from operations ......................... $ (5,115) $ 105,956 $ 285,861
Change in net unrealized appreciation of
investments, net of related deferred taxes .............. -- 611,000 122,919
--------- ---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations (5,115) 716,956 408,780
Capital stock transactions:
Common stock issued for cash .............................. 28,506 530,433 1,305,807
Common stock issued for services .......................... 8,317 86,550 204,219
--------- ---------- ----------
Net increase in net assets from stock transactions ......... 36,823 616,983 1,510,026
--------- ---------- ----------
Net increase in net assets ................................. 31,708 1,333,939 1,918,806
Net assets at beginning of period .......................... -- 31,708 1,365,647
--------- ---------- ----------
Net assets at end of period ................................ $ 31,708 $1,365,647 $3,284,453
========= ========== ==========
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended June 30
---------------------------
1999 2000
------------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Changes in net assets from operations:
Net income (loss) from operations ......................... $ 624,148 $ 606,786
Change in net unrealized appreciation of
investments, net of related deferred taxes .............. 605,000 150,621
---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations 1,229,148 757,407
Capital stock transactions:
Common stock issued for cash .............................. 1,305,807 --
Common stock issued for services .......................... 204,219 --
---------- ----------
Net increase in net assets from stock transactions ......... 1,510,026 --
---------- ----------
Net increase in net assets ................................. 2,739,174 757,407
Net assets at beginning of period .......................... 1,365,647 3,284,453
---------- ----------
Net assets at end of period ................................ $4,104,821 $4,041,860
========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
F-6
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Financial Highlights
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PER SHARE INFORMATION
Net asset value, beginning of period..... $ -- $ 0.02 $ 0.56 $ 0.56 $ 1.18
Net increase from operations(1) ........ -- 0.05 0.10 0.23 0.22
Net change in unrealized apprecia-
tion on
investments (after taxes)(1) ......... -- 0.23 ( 0.04) 0.13 0.05
Net increase from stock transac-
tions(1) ............................. 0.02 0.26 0.56 0.56 --
--------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------
Net asset value, end of period .......... $ 0.02 $ 0.56 $ 1.18 $ 1.48 $ 1.45
========= ========= ========== ========= ==========
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Net assets, end of period ............... $ 31,708 $1,365,647 $3,284,453 $4,104,821 $4,041,860
Ratio of expenses to average net
assets (2) ............................. 32% 31% 31% 15% 26%
Ratio of net income to average net
assets ................................. (32)% 15% 12% 23% 17%
Portfolio turnover rate ................. -- -- 7% -- --
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period .......... 2,070,494 2,304,691 2,682,420 2,682,420 2,782,226
</TABLE>
------------
1 Calculated based on weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
period.
2 Excluding income taxes.
See accompanying notes.
F-7
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date of Original
Shares Acquisition Cost Value
----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock in non-controlled affiliate - 95.2%
1,000,000 5/98 Lexon, Inc., publicly traded over the counter development
stage enterprise; developer of health care technology $ 320,000 $1,300,000
--------- ----------
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 95.2% $ 320,000 1,300,000
=========
Cash and other assets, less liabilities - 4.8% 65,647
----------
Net Assets - 100% $1,365,647
==========
</TABLE>
Notes to Schedule of Investments:
o The above investment is non-income producing. Equity investments that have
not paid dividends within the last twelve months are considered non-income
producing.
o Original cost approximates tax basis of investment.
o The valuation of all illiquid holdings is determined by the board of
directors in consultation with the Company's independent appraiser (Notes 1
and 2).
o Lexon, Inc. shares are restricted as to disposition for a two year period
commencing on the date of acquisition.
o As a greater than 10% holder, the Company is considered to be an affiliate of
the above company and as a result, its ability to sell the securities will
be limited under the Securities Act.
See accompanying notes.
F-8
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date of Original
Shares Acquisition Cost Value
----------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock in non-controlled affiliates - 79.0%
1,000,000 5/98 Lexon, Inc., publicly traded over the counter development
stage enterprise - 21.9%, developer of health care technology $ 320,000 $ 720,000
879,300 1/99 Image Analysis, Inc., privately held - 23.1%; medical and
hospital equipment developer 219,825 756,198
1,584,000 5/99 Centrex, Inc., privately held - 15.9%; developer of water
purification methodologies 522,720 522,720
900,000 5/99 Nucor Enterprises, Inc., privately held - 3.8%, developer of
construction materials 126,000 126,000
491,957 6/99 NuElectric, Inc., publicly traded over the counter - 9.3%
environmental services 142,667 305,013
150 11/99 Rosbon, Inc. - privately held - 5.0%, real estate development 87,000 165,000
---------- ----------
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 79.0% $1,418,212 2,594,931
========== ==========
Cash and other assets, less liabilities - 21.0% 689,522
----------
Net Assets at December 31, 1999 - 100% $3,284,453
==========
</TABLE>
Notes to Schedule of Investments:
o The above investments are non-income producing. Equity investments that have
not paid dividends within the last twelve months are considered non-income
producing.
o Original cost approximates tax basis of investments.
o The valuation of all illiquid holdings is determined by the board of
directors in consultation with the Company's independent appraiser (Notes 1
and 2).
o Lexon, Inc., Image Analysis, Inc., Centrex, Inc., Nucor Enterprises, Inc. and
395,978 NuElectric, Inc. shares are restricted as to disposition for a two
year period commencing on the date of acquisition.
o The Company owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock of each of the
above investments. As such, the Company is deemed to be an affiliate of the
above companies.
See accompanying notes.
F-9
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Schedule of Investments
June 30, 2000
(unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date of Original
Shares Acquisition Cost Value
----------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock in non-controlled affiliates - 112.4%
1,000,000 5/98 Lexon, Inc., publicly traded over the counter development
stage enterprise - 23.0%; developer of health care technology $ 320,000 $ 930,000
879,300 1/99 Image Analysis, Inc., privately held - 18.7%; medical and
hospital equipment developer 219,825 756,198
1,584,000 5/99 Centrex, Inc., privately held - 12.9%; developer of water
purification methodologies 522,720 522,720
900,000 5/99 Nucor Enterprises, Inc., privately held - 2.0%; developer of
construction materials 126,000 83,700
491,957 6/99 NuElectric, Inc., publicly traded over the counter - 9.4%;
environmental services 142,667 378,806
150 11/99 Rosbon, Inc. - privately held - 4.1%; real estate development 87,000 165,000
100,799 3/00 Graphco Technologies, Inc. - 23.6%; privately held
developer of e-commerce technologies 952,362 952,362
931,000 6/00 The Quantum Group, Inc. - 18.7%; publicly traded over the
counter developer of tire recycling methodologies 754,110 754,110
---------- ----------
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 112.4% $3,124,684 $4,542,896
========== ==========
Cash and other assets, less liabilities - (12.4%) (501,036)
Net Assets at June 30, 2000 - 100% $4,041,860
==========
</TABLE>
Notes to Schedule of Investments:
o The above investments are non-income producing. Equity investments that have
not paid dividends within the last twelve months are considered non-income
producing.
o Original cost approximates tax basis of investments.
o The valuation of all illiquid holdings is determined by the board of
directors in consultation with the Company's independent appraiser (Notes 1
and 2).
o Lexon, Inc., Image Analysis, Inc., Centrex, Inc., Nucor Enterprises, Inc.,
and 395,978 NuElectric, Inc. shares are restricted as to disposition for a
two year period commencing on the date of acquisition.
o The Company owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock of each of the
above investments with the exception of Graphco Technologies, Inc. and The
Quantum Group, Inc.
As such, the Company is deemed to be an affiliate of the above companies
with the exception of Graphco Technologies, Inc. and The Quantum Group, Inc.
F-10
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
The Company
We are a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that
has filed a notification of election to be treated as a Business Development
Company ("BDC") under the Investment Company Act of 1940 Act.
We commenced operations in 1997 as UTEK Corporation ("UTEK Florida"),
which was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida in August 1996.
UTEK Florida was engaged in the business of technology transfer. On December
31, 1998, we formed UTEK, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the
laws of the State of Florida. Subsequent thereto, the shareholders of UTEK
Florida exchanged their shares of common stock for membership units in UTEK,
LLC. In July 1999, we formed UTEK Corporation under the laws of the State of
Delaware and in October 1999, UTEK LLC was merged into UTEK Corporation.
As a BDC, we must be primarily engaged in the business of furnishing
capital and managerial expertise to companies that do not have ready access to
capital through conventional financial channels. Such companies are termed
"portfolio" companies.
The Company invests in portfolio companies that management believes are
positioned to benefit from the acquisition of new technology. The Company's
investments in portfolio companies are used by the portfolio companies to
acquire the license rights to new technologies developed at universities and
/or government research facilities. The Company provides portfolio companies
with managerial assistance in technology transfer. Technology transfer is the
process by which technologies developed by universities or research
laboratories are licensed to companies for commercial use. The Company also may
make additional investments to fund continued research and development of the
acquired technologies. All portfolio companies are privately-held and are
valued at cost, which the Company's board of directors has determined to be
fair market value and to be equal to the Company's purchase price for their
common stock.
The Company seeks "merger partners" for portfolio companies, whereby the
Company receives common stock in the merger partner in a non-taxable exchange
for shares of the portfolio company. The Company seeks merger partners that are
in the early stages of development. The merger partners normally have little or
no prior operating history.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of
UTEK Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary UTEK Holdings, Inc. All
intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Portfolio companies
are consolidated with the Company prior to the exchange of their shares with a
merger partner.
Interim Financial Information
The financial information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six
months then ended is unaudited, but includes all adjustments (consisting only
of normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management are necessary
in order to make the financial statements not misleading at such dates and for
those periods. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2000 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.
Segment Disclosures
Management considers the Company as operating in only one segment,
transfer of new technologies through the sale of portfolio companies. The
Company has no assets or significant operations established outside the United
States.
F-11
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued)
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies -- (Continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Investments
Investments are stated at value. Securities traded on the over-the-counter
market are valued at the closing price on the valuation date. Illiquid
securities may be subject to a discount from the closing price. Restricted
securities and other securities for which prices are not readily available, or
for which market quotations are considered not to reflect fair value, are
valued by independent appraisers based on applicable quantitative and
qualitative factors. These factors may include, but are not limited to, type of
securities, nature of business, marketability, market price of unrestricted
securities of the same issue, (if any), comparative valuation of securities of
publicly-traded companies in the same or similar industries, current financial
conditions and operating results, sales and earnings growth, operating
revenues, competitive conditions and current and prospective conditions in the
overall stock market. The Company's board of directors has relied on the
appraiser's valuation of investments to assist in its determination of fair
value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid fixed income investments with
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Income Taxes
The Company does not qualify as a Regulated Investment Company for income
tax purposes. Therefore, the Company is taxed as a regular corporation for
federal and state income tax purposes. The Company accounts for income taxes in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Deferred
tax liabilities are related principally to unrealized appreciation of
investments.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of technology rights upon the
exchange of the shares of portfolio companies with unrelated merger partners.
The Company records revenue based on the value of the consideration received.
In most cases, the consideration received for the Rights is the common stock of
the purchaser. The common stock received is recorded as an investment at value.
Revenue derived from consulting services is recognized as earned, over the life
of the underlying consulting agreements. In some cases, the Company is paid a
fee for negotiating a successful technology transfer. In these instances,
revenue is recognized upon consummation of the transaction.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the respective assets (generally two to five years). Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the
assets or lease term.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents amounts received but not yet earned for
consulting services to be provided under contractual obligations.
F-12
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued)
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies -- (Continued)
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments that potentially
subject the company to concentrations of credit risk. The estimated fair value
of financial instruments approximates the carrying value based on available
market information. The Company invests its excess available funds primarily in
U.S. Government backed securities. The Company's customers are typically
located in the United States.
Research and Development
Research and development costs consist of expenditures incurred during the
course of planned search and investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge
that will be useful in developing new products or processes. The Company
expenses all research and development costs as they are incurred. As of
December 31, 1998 and 1999, the Company had incurred no such costs. As of June
30, 2000 the Company had incurred $235,000 in such costs, which is classified
as sales and marketing expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
2. Investments
Equity securities at December 31, 1998, 1999 and June 30, 2000 (95%, 79%
and 112% of net assets, respectively) were valued at fair value as estimated by
independent third party appraisers hired by the Company, in the absence of
readily ascertainable fair values.
The values assigned to these securities are based upon available
information and do not reflect amounts that could be realized upon immediate
sale, nor amounts that ultimately may be realized. Accordingly, the fair values
included in the schedule of investments may differ from the values that would
have been used had a ready market existed for these securities and such
differences could be significant.
As of December 31, 1999 and June 30, 2000, the Company had established
seven and eight portfolio companies with net assets of $133,000 and $25,000,
respectively, which are included in other assets.
On January 28, 2000, the Company sold its Cancer Diagnostics portfolio
company to Lexon, Inc. for $200,000. We received $50,000 in cash and a
promissory note for $150,000.
On March 21, 2000, the Company sold its 70% interest in Digital Personnel,
Inc. a portfolio company, to a subsidiary of Graphco Technologies, Inc. ("GTC")
for 100,799 shares of GTC common stock in a non-taxable exchange.
On June 24, 2000, the Company sold its 95% interest in Advanced Recycling
Sciences, Inc. portfolio company to The Quantum Group, Inc. for 931,000
unregistered shares of The Quantum Group, Inc. capital stock.
3. Fixed Assets
Fixed assets consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31
------------------------- June 30
1998 1999 2000
---------- ------------ ------------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computer Equipment .................... $ 37,084 $ 54,741 $ 65,797
Furniture and Fixtures ................ 19,125 26,268 26,268
Leasehold improvements ................ 12,829 17,955 17,955
-------- --------- ---------
69,038 98,964 110,020
Less accumulated depreciation ......... (4,181) (18,226) (27,806)
-------- --------- ---------
$ 64,857 $ 80,738 $ 82,214
======== ========= =========
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued)
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
4. Income Taxes
Prior to October 14, 1999, the Company's business was structured as a
limited liability company ("LLC"). The LLC elected to be treated as a
partnership under the provisions of Subchapter K of the Internal Revenue Code.
Under those provisions, the LLC did not pay corporate income taxes on its
taxable income. Instead, the owners of the LLC were individually liable for
income taxes on the LLC's taxable income. The LLC's subsidiaries, including
UTEK Holdings and UTEK Corporation, were all taxed as C corporations. The tax
provisions for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, are
determined based on the earnings of UTEK Holdings, since the LLC and its other
subsidiaries did not begin operations until January 1, 1999.
On October 14, 1999, the Company restructured its business, whereby the
members of the LLC contributed their membership interests to the Company, a
newly created corporation. As a result, all of the LLC's assets, including the
stock of its subsidiaries, were transferred to the Company. The LLC ceased to
exist. In addition, UTEK Holdings and UTEK Corporation were liquidated into the
Company. As of October 14, 1999, the Company is taxable as a C Corporation.
The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based
upon differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
The components of the income tax provision (benefit) on operations,
excluding deferred income taxes on unrealized appreciation of investments, are
as follows:
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30,
------------------------------- ----------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
------ --------- ---------- ------------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
Current:
Federal $-- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
State -- -- -- -- --
--- ------- -------- ---------- --------
-- -- -- -- --
Deferred:
Federal -- 53,322 257,168 (96,469) 313,884
State -- 9,128 44,022 (16,513) 53,572
--- ------- -------- ---------- --------
-- 62,450 301,190 (112,982) 367,456
--- ------- -------- ---------- --------
$-- $62,450 $301,190 $ (112,982) $367,456
=== ======= ======== ========== ========
A reconciliation of the differences between the effective income tax rate
and the statutory federal tax rate follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30,
--------------------------------------- ----------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
------------ ---------- ----------- ------------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tax at U.S. statutory rate $ (1,739) $ 57,258 $199,597 $ 173,796 $331,242
State taxes, net of federal benefit (186) 6,210 29,057 (10,899) 36,214
Valuation allowance 1,925 (1,925) -- -- --
LLC loss deductible by members -- -- 71,193 (277,040) --
Other -- 907 1,343 1,161 --
-------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
$ -- $ 62,450 $301,190 $ (112,982) $367,456
======== ======== ======== ========== ========
</TABLE>
F-14
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued)
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
4. Income Taxes -- (Continued)
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30,
------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
----------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Noncurrent deferred tax asset:
Net operating loss carryforward $ 1,925 $ 57,740 $ 107,741 $ 170,948 $ 383,358
Other 203 -- 203
Less: Valuation allowance (1,925) -- -- -- --
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------
-- 57,740 107,944 170,948 383,561
Current deferred tax liability:
Investments in non-controlled -- (489,190) (914,383) (854,416) (1,648,329)
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------
affiliates
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $ -- $ (431,450) $ (806,439) $ (683,468) $ (1,264,768)
======== ========== ========== ========== ============
</TABLE>
SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax
assets reported if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management
has determined that a valuation allowance is not necessary as of December 31,
1999.
At December 31, 1999, the Company has available net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $286,000, which expire in 2012, 2018, and 2019.
On a pro forma basis, if the Company were a taxable entity for all
periods, the Company would recognize the benefit of additional taxable losses
of approximately $209,000. The unaudited pro forma tax provision on operations,
presented as if the Company were a taxable entity for all periods presented and
calculated in accordance with SFAS NO. 109, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30,
------------------------------- ----------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
------ --------- ---------- ------------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Current income tax provision $-- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Deferred income tax provision -- 62,450 222,396 193,636 367,456
--- ------- -------- -------- --------
$-- $62,450 $222,396 $193,636 $367,456
=== ======= ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of the differences between the pro forma effective income
tax rate and the pro forma statutory federal tax rate follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended
Year Ended December 31 June 30,
--------------------------------------- ----------------------------
1997 1998 1999 1999 2000
------------ ---------- ----------- ------------- ------------
(unaudited) (unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tax at U.S. statutory rate $ (1,739) $ 57,258 $199,597 $173,796 $331,242
State taxes, net of federal benefit (186) 6,210 21,456 18,679 36,214
Valuation allowance 1,925 (1,925) -- -- --
Other -- 907 1,343 1,161 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ -- $ 62,450 $222,396 $193,636 $367,456
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued)
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
5. Stockholders' Equity
Transactions in common stock for the three years ended December 31, 1999
and the six months ended June 30, 2000 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additional
Common Stock Shares Par value paid-in capital
------------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1997 -- $ -- $ --
Initial funding-August 27, 1997 1,950,000 19,500 9,006
Issued for services 166,334 1,664 6,653
--------- ------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1997 2,116,334 21,164 15,659
Private placement -- May 14, 1998 207,068 2,070 308,532
Private placement -- July 25, 1998 96,400 964 218,867
--------- ------- ----------
303,468 3,034 527,399
Issued for services 34,600 346 86,204
--------- ------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1998 2,454,402 24,544 629,262
Private placement--April 12, 1999 281,424 2,814 1,302,993
Issued for services 46,400 464 203,755
--------- ------- ----------
Balance at December 31, 1999 and June 30, 2000 2,782,226 $27,822 $2,136,010
========= ======= ==========
</TABLE>
The Board of Directors of UTEK Corporation authorized management of the
Company to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the initial public offering of the Company's Common Stock. The
Company contemplates using the proceeds from the proposed public offering to
finance its growth plans.
In conjunction with the proposed public offering discussed above, the
Company intends to issue approximately 1,150,000 shares, including the
underwriters' over-allotment option. This amount excludes 100,000 shares
reserved for issuance upon exercise of the underwriters' warrants exercisable
over a period of four years at $9.90 per share.
In September 1999, the Company's stockholders approved the establishment
of an employee stock option plan. Under the Plan, the Company is authorized to
grant options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock. At December 31,
1999 and June 30, 2000, no options had been granted.
Additionally, upon completion of the above mentioned offering, the Company
intends to grant to its CEO and President incentive stock options to purchase
up to 100,000 and 50,000 shares of its common stock, respectively.
In addition, other employees and members of the Board of Directors will be
granted an aggregate of 228,000 options.
6. Stock Compensation and Employment Agreements
Stock grants to employees and non-employees in exchange for services have
a vesting period of two years. The Company accounts for stock grants to
employees in exchange for services in accordance with APB No 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. Stock grants to non-employees in exchange for
services are accounted for in accordance with FAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. Expenses related to stock grants to employees and
non-employees during fiscal 1997, 1998, and 1999, amounted to $4,900, $78,700,
and $204,000, respectively.
Effective September 1, 1999, the Company entered into five-year employment
agreements with its CEO and President providing for an annual base salary of
$150,000 and $100,000, respectively for their services.
7. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company's commitments are limited to an operating lease for the
corporate office. During fiscal 1997, 1998, 1999 rental expense related to this
lease was $-0-, $6,932, $16,937, respectively.
F-16
<PAGE>
UTEK Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued)
(Information as of June 30, 1999 and 2000 and for the six months then ended is
unaudited)
7. Commitments and Contingencies -- (Continued)
At December 31, 1999, future minimum payments under operating leases are
as follows:
2000 $18,993
2001 18,993
2002 4,748
-------
Total $42,734
=======
8. Subsequent Events (unaudited)
On August 8, 2000, the Company received and signed a letter of intent from
Voice & Wireless Corporation for the acquisition of its subsidiary, Universal
Keypad, Inc. This transaction may take place by October 31, 2000 pending the
result of due diligence and provided all necessary conditions and approvals are
achieved.
In August 2000, the Company sold 75,027 shares of its Lexon, Inc. common
stock for $62,035.
On September 6, 2000, the Company and its previous underwriter mutually
agreed to terminate their investment banking relationship. On September 6, 2000,
the Company and Schneider Securities, Inc. signed a letter of intent for
Schneider Securities to provide investment banking services to the Company.
On September 13, 2000, the Company finalized a revolving line of credit
loan with a local financial institution. This line of credit allows the Company
to borrow up to $150,000 with a rate of interest at prime (presently 9.5%). The
line of credit is due on demand and is secured by a pledge of a portion of the
Company's investments in non-controlled affiliates and the personal guarantees
of the chief executive officer, a director, and a shareholder.
On September 21, 2000 the Company received 546,000 shares of common stock
of NuElectric, Inc., in connection with the merger of the Company's portfolio
company Zorax, Inc. (of which it owned 91%) into NuElectric, Inc.
F-17
<PAGE>
===============================================================================
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide information different from that contained
in this prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares
of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The
information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of
this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of
any sale of our common stock.
-----------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
---------
Prospectus Summary ................................ 1
Risk Factors ...................................... 6
Dilution .......................................... 14
Dividends and Future Distributions ................ 15
Capitalization .................................... 15
Use of Proceeds ................................... 16
Selected Financial Data ........................... 17
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations ..................................... 18
Business .......................................... 22
Investment Objectives and Policies ................ 22
Determination of Net Asset Value .................. 32
Portfolio Transactions ............................ 33
Regulation ........................................ 33
Management ........................................ 35
Control Persons and Principal Holders of
Securities ..................................... 39
Conflicts of Interest ............................. 40
Investment Advisory Services ...................... 40
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices .......... 40
Income Tax Matters ................................ 41
Description of Securities ......................... 41
Underwriting ...................................... 43
Legal Matters ..................................... 45
Experts ........................................... 45
Custodian ......................................... 45
Consolidated Financial Statements ................. F-1
-----------------------------------
Until , 2000 (25 days after the date of this Prospectus), all dealers
effecting transactions in our securities, whether or not participating in this
distribution, may be required to deliver a Prospectus. This is in addition to
the obligation of dealers to deliver a Prospectus with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
===============================================================================
<PAGE>
===============================================================================
1,000,000
Shares
of Common Stock
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
UTEK CORPORATION
----------
PROSPECTUS
----------
Schneider Securities, Inc.
===============================================================================
<PAGE>
PART C
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 24. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
(1) Financial Statements
See "Index to Financial Statements" on page F-1 of the prospectus
(2) Exhibits
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement**
1.2 Form of Agreement Among Underwriters**
1.3 Form of Selected Dealers' Agreement**
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, dated July 6, 1999, as filed and recorded with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware on July 13, 1999**
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, dated October 14, 1999, as filed and
recorded with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 15, 1999.**
3.3 By-Laws of UTEK Corporation**
4.1 Form of Representative's Warrant**
4.2 Certificate of Merger of UTEK Corporation and UTEK LLC, dated October 18, 1999,
as filed and recorded with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 25, 1999.**
4.3 Specimen Common Stock Certificate**
5.1 Opinion of Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz, LLP
10.1 Form of Financial Consulting Agreement between UTEK Corporation and Schneider Securities,
Inc.
10.2 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan**
10.3 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan**
10.4 Employment Agreement with Clifford M. Gross**
10.5 Employment Agreement with Uwe Reischl**
10.6 Agreement dated January 30, 1998 between UTEK Corporation and the University of South
Florida**
10.7 Master Agreement dated June 18, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity**
10.8 Strategic Alliance dated November 3, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Fraunhofer Institute
for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB**
10.9 Strategic Alliance dated October 18, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and University of Florida**
10.10 Services Agreement dated May 18, 1998 between UTEK Corporation and the University of
Memphis.**
10.11 Consulting Agreement between UTEK Corporation and NuElectric Corporation, dated
November 16, 1998.**
10.12 Consulting Agreement between UTEK Corporation and Darby Group Companies, dated
May 3, 1999.**
10.13 License Agreement dated July 13, 1999 between The Regents of the University of California and
E. Coli Measurement Systems, Inc.**
10.14 License Agreement dated January 1, 1999 between Clean Water Technologies, Inc. and the
University of South Florida Research Foundation, Inc.**
10.15 Sponsored Research Agreement dated February 12, 1999 between Advanced Reinforcing Technolo-
gies, Inc. and Cornell University**
10.16 License Agreement between Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. and Advanced Reinforcing
Technologies, Inc. dated March 1, 1999.**
10.17 License Agreement dated December 15, 1999 between the California Institute of Technology and
Digital Personnel, Inc.**
10.18 License Agreement dated September 1999 between Safe Water Technologies, Inc. and University of
South Florida Research Foundation, Inc.**
10.19 Strategic Alliance dated December 13, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Virginia Tech Intel-
lectual Properties, Inc.**
</TABLE>
II-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.20 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 21, 2000 between UTEK Corporation, Digital Person-
nel, Inc. and Graphco-DPI Holding Company, Inc.**
10.21 License Agreement dated as of March 28, 2000 between Johns Hopkins University and Zorax,
Inc.**
10.22 Sponsored Research Agreement dated March 31, 2000 between Johns Hopkins University and
Zorax, Inc.**
10.23 Strategic Alliance dated December 23, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Florida State Univer-
sity Research Foundation.**
10.24 Strategic Alliance dated March 23, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and Florida Institute of Tech-
nology.**
10.25 Strategic Alliance dated April 14, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and Sopartec.
10.26 Strategic Alliance dated June 1, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and Auburn University.
10.27 Commercial Pledge and Security Agreement dated September 13, 2000 between UTEK Corpora-
tion and The Bank of Tampa.**
10.28 Merger Agreement dated September 21, 2000 between UTEK Corporation, NuElectric, Inc. and Zorax, Inc.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP, independent auditors.
23.2 Consent of Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz, LLP (incorporated into Exhibit 5.1)
24.1 Powers of Attorney (included on signature page)
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
------------
Exhibits have been filed herewith unless otherwise indicated.
* To be filed by amendment
** Previously filed
ITEM 25. MARKETING ARRANGEMENTS
The information contained under the heading "Underwriting" on pages 43-45
of the prospectus is incorporated herein by this reference.
See the form of Underwriting Agreement filed as exhibit 1.1 hereto.
ITEM 26. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The following is a statement of the estimated expenses to be paid by the
Company in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities
being registered:
SEC Registration Fee .................................... $ 2,083
NASD Filing Fee ......................................... 1,262
Nasdaq Listing Fees* .................................... 6,250
Printing Engraving Expenses* ............................ 90,000
Legal Fees and Expenses* ................................ 290,000
Accounting Fees and Expenses* ........................... 260,000
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses* ............................. 35,000
Transfer Agent and Registrar Fees and Expenses* ......... 10,000
Miscellaneous* .......................................... 9,405
--------
Total ................................................ $704,000
========
------------
* estimate
ITEM 27. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL
Microsphere Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company.
Technology Development, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company.
Advanced Desalination, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company.
Doppler Tomography International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
II-2
<PAGE>
ITEM 28. NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
The following table sets forth the number of record holders of the
Company's common stock as of the date hereof:
Title of Class Number of Record Holders
-------------- ------------------------
Common Stock, $0.01 par value .......... 106
ITEM 29. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
provides for the indemnification of officers and directors under certain
circumstances against expenses incurred in successfully defending against a
claim and authorizes Delaware corporations to indemnify their officers and
directors under certain circumstances against expenses and liabilities incurred
in legal proceedings involving such persons because of their being or having
been an officer or director.
Section 102(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a
corporation, by so providing in its Certificate of Incorporation, to eliminate
or limit a director's liability to the corporation and its stockholders for
monetary damages arising out of certain alleged breaches of their fiduciary
duty. Section 102(b)(7) provides that no such limitation of liability may
affect a director's liability with respect to any of the following: (i)
breaches of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders; (ii) acts or omissions not made in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct of knowing violations of law; (iii) liability for
dividends paid or stock repurchased or redeemed in violation of the Delaware
General Corporation law; or (iv) any transaction from which the director
derived an improper personal benefit. Section 102(b)(7) does not authorize any
limitation on the ability of the company or its stockholders to obtain
injunctive relief, specific performance or other equitable relief against
directors.
Article Ten of our Certificate of Incorporation provides that the personal
liability of our directors be eliminated to the fullest extent permitted under
the Delaware General Corporation law.
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of the issue.
We refer to the Underwriting Agreement, the proposed form of which is
filed as Exhibit 1.1, pursuant to which the underwriter agrees to indemnify our
directors and certain of our officers and certain other persons against certain
civil liabilities.
ITEM 30. BUSINESS AND OTHER FUNCTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISOR
Not applicable.
ITEM 31. LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
Our accounts and records are and will be maintained at the address set
forth below:
UTEK Corporation
202 South Wheeler Street
Plant City, Florida 33566
II-3
<PAGE>
ITEM 32. MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Except as described in the prospectus under "Management", we are not a
party to any management services transaction.
ITEM 33. UNDERTAKINGS
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the 1933 Act may
be available to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to any charter provision, By-law, contract arrangement, statute, or
otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in
the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the 1933
Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) to suspend the offering of shares until the prospectus is amended if
(i) subsequent to the effective date of its registration statement, the net
asset value declines more than ten percent from its net asset value as of
the effective date of the registration statement or (ii) the net asset
value increases to an amount greater than its net proceeds as stated in the
prospectus; and
(2) that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as
part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and
contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule
424(b)(1) or (4) or Rule 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to
be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared
effective; and
(3) that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form
of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating
to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at
that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof, and
(4) to remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination
of the offering.
II-4
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Act, the Registrant certifies that it
has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirement for
filing on Form N-2 and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the State of
Florida on October 2, 2000.
UTEK Corporation
By: /s/ Clifford M. Gross
------------------------------------------
Clifford M. Gross
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Clifford M. Gross Chief Executive Officer and Chairman October 2, 2000
-------------------------- of the Board of Directors
Clifford M. Gross
* President October 2, 2000
--------------------------
Uwe Reischl
* Chief Financial Officer October 2, 2000
--------------------------
Carole R. Mason
* General Counsel and Director October 2, 2000
--------------------------
Sam Reiber
* Director of Scientific Advisory Board October 2, 2000
-------------------------- and Director
Stuart M. Brooks
* Director October 2, 2000
--------------------------
Kwabena Gyimah-Brempong
* Director October 2, 2000
--------------------------
Arthur Chapnik
* Director October 2, 2000
--------------------------
Carl Nisser
/s/ David Michael Director October 2, 2000
--------------------------
David Michael
*By: /s/ Clifford M. Gross
---------------------
Clifford M. Gross
(attorney-in-fact)
</TABLE>
II-5
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement
1.2 Form of Agreement Among Underwriters
1.3 Form of Selected Dealers' Agreement
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, dated July 6, 1999, as filed and recorded with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware on July 13, 1999**
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, dated October 14, 1999, as filed and recorded with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 15, 1999.**
3.3 By-Laws of UTEK Corporation**
4.1 Form of Representative's Warrant
4.2 Certificate of Merger of UTEK Corporation and UTEK LLC, dated October 18, 1999,
as filed and recorded with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 25, 1999.**
4.3 Specimen Common Stock Certificate**
5.1 Opinion of Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz, LLP
10.1 Form of Financial Consulting Agreement between UTEK Corporation and Schneider Securities, Inc.
10.2 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan**
10.3 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan**
10.4 Employment Agreement with Clifford M. Gross**
10.5 Employment Agreement with Uwe Reischl**
10.6 Agreement dated January 30, 1998 between UTEK Corporation and the University of South Florida**
10.7 Master Agreement dated June 18, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Johns Hopkins University**
10.8 Strategic Alliance dated November 3, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Fraunhofer Institute for
Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB**
10.9 Strategic Alliance dated October 18, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and University of Florida**
10.10 Services Agreement dated May 18, 1998 between UTEK Corporation and the University of
Memphis.**
10.11 Consulting Agreement between UTEK Corporation and NuElectric Corporation, dated
November 16, 1998.**
10.12 Consulting Agreement between UTEK Corporation and Darby Group Companies, dated
May 3, 1999.**
10.13 License Agreement dated July 13, 1999 between The Regents of the University of California and E. Coli
Measurement Systems, Inc.**
10.14 License Agreement dated January 1, 1999 between Clean Water Technologies, Inc. and the
University of South Florida Research Foundation, Inc.**
10.15 Sponsored Research Agreement dated February 12, 1999 between Advanced Reinforcing Technologies, Inc.
and Cornell University**
10.16 License Agreement between Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. and Advanced Reinforcing
Technologies, Inc. dated March 1, 1999.**
10.17 License Agreement dated December 15, 1999 between the California Institute of Technology and Digital
Personnel, Inc.**
10.18 License Agreement dated September 1999 between Safe Water Technologies, Inc. and University of South
Florida Research Foundation, Inc.**
10.19 Strategic Alliance dated December 13, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Virginia Tech Intellectual
Properties, Inc.**
10.20 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 21, 2000 between UTEK Corporation, Digital Personnel, Inc.
and Graphco-DPI Holding Company, Inc.**
10.21 License Agreement dated as of March 28, 2000 between Johns Hopkins University and Zorax, Inc.**
10.22 Sponsored Research Agreement dated March 31, 2000 between Johns Hopkins University and Zorax, Inc.**
10.23 Strategic Alliance dated December 23, 1999 between UTEK Corporation and Florida State University
Research Foundation.*
10.24 Strategic Alliance dated March 23, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and Florida Institute of Technology.*
10.25 Strategic Alliance dated April 14, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and Sopartec.
10.26 Strategic Alliance dated June 1, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and Auburn University.
10.27 Commercial Pledge and Security Agreement dated September 13, 2000 between UTEK Corporation and The
Bank of Tampa
10.28 Merger Agreement dated September 21, 2000 between UTEK Corporation, NuElectric, Inc. and Zorax, Inc.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP, independent auditors.
23.2 Consent of Gersten, Savage & Kaplowitz, LLP (incorporated into Exhibit 5.1)
24.1 Powers of Attorney (included on signature page)
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
------------
Exhibits have been filed herewith unless otherwise indicated
* To be filed by amendment
** Previously filed
