Exhibit 8.2
Opinion of Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
re: State Tax Matters
<PAGE>
October 23, 2000
Board of Directors
Lawrence Financial Holdings, Inc.
311 South Fifth Street
Ironton, Ohio 45638
Board of Directors
Lawrence Federal Savings Bank
311 South Fifth Street
Ironton, Ohio 45638
Re: Ohio business franchise tax and Ohio personal income tax opinion relating
to the proposed Conversion of Lawrence Federal Savings Bank, a
federally-chartered mutual savings bank, to a federally-chartered capital
stock savings bank and the concurrent acquisition of 100% of the
newly-issued stock of such corporation by Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc., a newly-formed Maryland holding company.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request, our opinion concerning certain Ohio business franchise
tax and Ohio personal income tax consequences of the proposed Conversion of
Lawrence Federal Savings Bank, a federally-chartered mutual savings bank (the
"Bank") to a federally-chartered capital stock savings bank (the "Converted
Bank") and the concurrent acquisition of 100% of the newly-issued stock of such
corporation by Lawrence Financial Holdings, Inc., a newly-formed Maryland
corporation operating exclusively within the State of Ohio (the "Holding
Company"), is set forth below.
Statement of Facts and Determinations
The facts and circumstances surrounding the proposed reorganization are quite
detailed and are described at length in the Plan of Conversion dated July 31,
2000. The related assumptions regarding such Conversion are documented in the
federal tax opinion letter dated July 31, 2000, as provided by Muldoon, Murphy &
Faucette.
Pursuant to the Plan of Conversion, Bank will, through a series of transactions,
convert from a federally-chartered mutual savings bank to a federally-chartered
capital stock savings bank and issue 100% of its newly-issued stock to Holding
Company.
<PAGE>
Board of Directors
October 23, 2000
Page 2
In addition, based on the opinion of Muldoon, Murphy & Faucette, as presented in
their letter dated October 18, 2000, for purposes of this opinion, the following
federal tax consequences will result:
1) The Conversion of Bank to Converted Bank will constitute a tax-free
reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended.
2) No gain or loss will be recognized for federal income tax purposes by Bank,
Converted Bank or Holding Company as a result of the Conversion, except
that some taxable gain could result to Holding Company and/or Converted
Bank if the stock subscription rights distributed to Eligible Account
Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders of Bank are subsequently
found to have a fair market value.
3) Taxable income will be recognized for federal income tax purposes by the
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders of Bank
only to the extent of the taxable value, if any, of the stock subscription
rights received.
Based upon our analysis of applicable Ohio tax law and administrative rulings,
we have made the following determinations:
A) The income tax liability of a corporation, other than a bank or thrift,
conducting business and owning property within Ohio, is calculated by
reference to the separate federal taxable income of that corporation, with
certain modifications (Section 5733.04(I) of the Ohio Revised Code).
B) Banks and thrifts are not subject to the Ohio income tax (Section
5733.06(D) of the Ohio Revised Code).
C) The net worth tax liability of any corporation, including banks and
thrifts, conducting business and owning property within Ohio, is determined
by reference to the balance sheet of the corporation as of the end of its
fiscal year or, under certain circumstances, as of December 31 of the year
preceding the first year such corporation is required to file an Ohio
franchise tax return (Sections 5733.056(B), 5733.05(C) and 5733.031(A) of
the Ohio Revised Code and Tax Commissioner's Rule 5703-5-03)
D) The income tax liability of an individual subject to the Ohio income tax on
personal income is calculated by reference to the federal Adjusted Gross
Income of that individual, with certain modifications (Section 5747.02 of
the Ohio Revised Code).
Opinion
Based upon the above facts and the opinions provided in the federal tax opinion
letter dated October 18, 2000, as provided by Muldoon, Murphy & Faucette, we are
of the opinion that, if the Conversion is effected in accordance with the Plan
of Conversion, for Ohio tax purposes:
<PAGE>
Board of Directors
October 23, 2000
Page 3
1) No gain or loss will be recognized by Bank upon its Conversion from a
federally-chartered mutual savings bank to a federally-chartered capital
stock savings bank because such conversion will have no effect on the
federal taxable income of Bank and because Bank is exempt from the Ohio
income tax.
2) No gain or loss will be recognized by Holding Company or Converted Bank
upon the acquisition of the stock of Converted Bank by Holding Company
because such acquisition will have no effect on the federal taxable income
of either corporation.
3) No gain or loss will be recognized by Holding Company upon the receipt of
property in exchange for its newly issued shares of stock because such
receipt will have no effect on the federal taxable income of Holding
Company.
4) Ohio taxable income will be recognized by Holding Company only to the
extent that federal taxable income is recognized by Holding Company as a
result of its distribution of subscription rights to Eligible Account
Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders of Bank.
5) Ohio taxable income will be recognized by Eligible Account Holders and
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders of Bank only to the extent that
taxable income is recognized with respect to the stock subscription rights
received in the Eligible Account Holders' and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders' federal Adjusted Gross Income.
Our opinion is based upon the current Ohio Revised Code and other legal
authorities currently in effect, which authorities are subject to modification
or challenge at any time and perhaps with retroactive effect. Further, no
opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction under the
provisions of any of the other sections of the Ohio Revised Code which may also
be applicable thereto, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at
the time of, or effects resulting from, the transaction which are not
specifically covered by the opinions set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
