BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORP
10-Q/A, 1999-08-25
DRUGS, PROPRIETARIES & DRUGGISTS' SUNDRIES
Previous: BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES INC, 4, 1999-08-25
Next: BRESLER & REINER INC, 8-K, 1999-08-25


THIS AMENDMENT IS A RE-FILING OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, WHICH WAS TIMELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION BY THE
COMPANY ON AUGUST 17, 1999 VIA EDGAR AND ALSO FILED ON AUGUST 16, 1999 BY
HARDCOPY PURSUANT TO A RULE 201 TEMPORARY HARDSHIP EXEMPTION UNDER REGULATION
S-T. THE FORM 10-Q FILED VIA EDGAR ON AUGUST 17, 1999 CONTAINS NON-SUBSTANTIVE
FORMATTING ERRORS AS A RESULT OF TECHNICAL PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED WITH THAT
FILING, WHICH THIS AMENDMENT CORRECTS.

[ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

[ X ]

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1999

OR

[

]

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission file number 1-5110

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey

22-1444512

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

 

4000 Metropolitan Drive, Orange, California

92868-3510

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

 

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

(714) 385-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Title of each class of
Common Stock

 

Number of Shares Outstanding
July 31, 1999

 

 

 

Class A Common Stock -
par value $1.50 per share

 


134,206,974


 

[ COVER ]

 

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

INDEX

 

Page No.

   

Part I.

Financial Information

       
 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

 
       
   

Consolidated Balance Sheets, June 30,

3

     

1999 and September 30, 1998

 
       
   

Statements of Consolidated Earnings

5

     

for the third quarter and nine months
ended June 30, 1999 and 1998

 
       
   

Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for the

6

     

nine months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998

 
       
   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7

       
 

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial

15

   

Condition and Results of Operations

 
       
 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures

27

   

About Market Risk

 
   

Part II.

Other Information

       
 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

28

     
 

Item 2.

Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

33

     
 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

33

     
 

Item 6.

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

35

   

Signatures

37

   

Index to Exhibits

38


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 1999 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1998

(dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)


June 30,

September 30,

- - ASSETS - -

1999

1998


CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

113,348

 

$

79,004

 

 

Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for doubtful receivables: $70,038 at June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999 and $30,363 at September 30, 1998

 

 

1,413,686

 

 

920,247

 

 

Inventories

 

 

2,203,373

 

 

1,458,290

 

 

Income taxes receivable

 

 

-

 

 

38,371

 

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

50,835

 

 

4,876

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

3,781,242

 

 

2,500,788

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY - at cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

11,630

 

 

12,427

 

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

 

128,474

 

 

88,055

 

 

Equipment and fixtures

 

 

245,540

 

 

186,077

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Total property

 

 

385,644

 

 

286,559

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

156,094

 

 

141,745

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Property - net

 

 

229,550

 

 

144,814

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill - net

 

 

1,622,564

 

 

253,568

 

 

Investments

 

 

13,198

 

 

8,851

 

 

Noncurrent receivables

 

 

23,943

 

 

19,176

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

6,441

 

 

7,352

 

 

Deferred charges and other assets

 

 

129,641

 

 

68,663

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Total other assets

 

 

1,795,787

 

 

357,610

 

 


 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

5,806,579

 

$

3,003,212

 

 


 

 


 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


 

[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ] 

 

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 1999 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1998

(dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 


 

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

- - LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY - -

1999

 

 

1998

 


 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Accounts payable

$

2,117,564

$

1,579,332

Accrued liabilities

192,451

113,331

Customer credit balances

174,773

137,832

Income taxes payable

6,895

-

Deferred income taxes

82,187

72,846

Current portion of long-term obligations

350,183

6,029


Total current liabilities

2,924,053

1,909,370


LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS:

7 3/8% senior notes

149,605

149,522

7 1/4% senior notes

99,793

99,767

8 3/8% senior subordinated notes

308,119

-

Commercial paper

188,815

-

Revolving bank loan payable

211,185

170,000

7% convertible subordinated debentures

20,609

20,609

6 7/8% exchangeable subordinated debentures

8,425

8,425

Deferred income taxes

8,422

-

Other

57,305

16,455


Total long-term obligations

1,052,278

464,778


COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE

PREFERRED SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUST

HOLDING SOLELY DEBT SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY

300,000

-

SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY:

Capital stock:

Preferred - authorized: 3,000,000 shares; issued: none

-

-

Class A Common - authorized: 300,000,000 shares;

issued: 137,295,878 shares at June 30, 1999

and 111,835,142 shares at September 30, 1998

205,944

167,753

Paid-in capital

814,366

80,231

Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of income taxes

535

(132

)

Retained earnings

534,533

453,654


Total

1,555,378

701,506

Less Treasury shares at cost: 3,100,349 shares at June 30,

1999 and 8,952,812 shares at September 30, 1998

25,130

72,442


Total shareowners' equity

1,530,248

629,064


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY

$

5,806,579

$

3,003,212



See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS

FOR THE THIRD QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS ENDED

JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998

(in thousands except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

THIRD QUARTER

NINE MONTHS



1999

1998

1999

1998



Consolidated earnings:

Net sales and other revenues:

Excluding bulk shipments to

customers' warehouses

$

4,454,888

$

3,513,184

$

12,716,939

$

10,053,851

Bulk shipments to customers'

warehouses

1,048,430

946,420

2,815,158

2,423,111





Total net sales and other revenues

5,503,318

4,459,604

15,532,097

12,476,962





Costs and expenses:

Cost of sales

5,176,829

4,270,621

14,753,343

11,926,508

Distribution, selling, general

and administrative expenses

244,209

133,264

559,142

389,394

Special charges

-

-

-

9,800





Total costs and expenses

5,421,038

4,403,885

15,312,485

12,325,702





Operating earnings

82,280

55,719

219,612

151,260

Net interest expense

22,044

9,650

47,906

30,339





Earnings before taxes on income and

distributions on preferred securities

of subsidiary trust

60,236

46,069

171,706

120,921

Taxes on income

26,101

18,889

71,246

53,596





Earnings before distributions on

preferred securities of subsidiary trust

34,135

27,180

100,460

67,325

Distributions on preferred securities

of subsidiary trust, net of income tax

benefit of $860

(1,350

)

-

(1,350

)

-





Net earnings

$

32,785

$

27,180

$

99,110

$

67,325





Earnings per share:

Basic

$

.26

$

.27

$

.88

$

.67





Diluted

$

.26

$

.26

$

.87

$

.66





Weighted average number of

shares outstanding:

Basic

125,935

101,038

112,377

100,919





Diluted

127,007

102,547

113,866

102,423





Cash dividends declared per share

of Class A Common Stock

$

.075

$

.060

$

.150

$

.180






See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED

JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)


1999

1998


Operating Activities

Net earnings

$

99,110

$

67,325

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash

flows from operating activities:

Provision for doubtful receivables

20,527

9,299

Depreciation and amortization of property

23,563

17,339

Loss on dispositions of property

656

998

Amortization of intangible assets

16,934

10,279

Deferred compensation

2,726

2,128

Deferred income taxes

10,693

(3,475)

Effects of changes on, net of business acquisitions:

Receivables

(142,378

)

(117,275

)

Inventories

(661,380

)

(264,732

)

Income taxes receivable/payable

41,043

19,226

Prepaid expenses and other assets

(42,671

)

(6,109

)

Accounts payable

439,893

260,943

Accrued liabilities

18,374

(12,201

)

Customer credit balances

36,941

(10,354

)



Net cash flows from operating activities

(135,969

)

(26,609

)



Investing Activities

Property acquisitions

(27,001

)

(17,604

)

Acquisition of businesses, less cash acquired

(238,519

)

(23,065

)

Other

1,705

644



Net cash flows from investing activities

(263,815

)

(40,025

)



Financing Activities

Net revolving bank loan activity

41,185

80,000

Net commercial paper activity

535,600

-

Proceeds from issuance of trust preferred securities,

net of issuance costs

290,405

-

Redemption of senior subordinated notes

(16,881

)

-

Repayment of other obligations, principally debt

of acquired entities

(394,726

)

(1,036

)

Distributions paid on trust preferred securities

(2,210

)

-

Shareowners' equity transactions:

Exercise of stock options

6,540

1,988

Cash dividends paid on Common Stock

(25,975

)

(18,158

)

Other

190

-



Net cash flows from financing activities

434,128

62,794



Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

34,344

(3,840

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

79,004

54,494



Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

113,348

$

50,654



Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

$

42,224

$

28,578

Income taxes - net of refunds

19,612

38,651


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


 

[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

 

1.

Basis Of Presentation

Bergen Brunswig Corporation, a New Jersey corporation formed in 1956, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is one of the nation's leading supply channel management companies, providing pharmaceuticals, medical-surgical and specialty products as well as information management solutions and outsourcing services designed to improve cost-effectiveness and increase value for customers, patients and manufacturers across the entire healthcare spectrum. Additionally, the Company serves approximately 500,000 patients in long-term care and alternate site settings. The Company also develops disease-specific treatment protocols and pharmacoeconomic initiatives to assist in the reduction of overall healthcare costs while improving disease management and outcomes.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, after elimination of the effect of intercompany transactions and balances.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for reporting on Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements and notes to conform to fiscal 1999 presentations.

The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles necessarily requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

 

 

2.

Accounting Pronouncements

Effective October 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. This statement defines comprehensive income as "all changes in equity during the period with the exception of stock issuances and dividends." The Company's comprehensive income consists of the following:

 

Third Quarter
Ended
June 30,

 

Nine Months
Ended
June 30,



Dollars in thousands

 

1999

 

1998

 

1999

 

1998

 


Net earnings

$

32.8

$

27.2

$

99.1

$

67.3

 

Net unrealized gain (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

on investments

 

0.2

 

(0.4

)

0.7

 

(0.3

)


Comprehensive income

$

33.0

$

26.8

$

99.8

$

67.0

 


 

Effective October 1, 1998, the Company adopted the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use". This statement provides guidance for the capitalization and amortization of costs incurred in connection with software to be used internally by the Company. Adoption of the statement has not had a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Consistent with its past practices, the Company is assessing the recoverability of goodwill and the impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" which requires impairment losses to be recognized for long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the assets' carrying amounts. An impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of an asset to its carrying amount.

 

 

3.

Revenue Recognition

The Company records revenues when product is shipped or services are provided to its customers. Along with other companies in its industry, the Company now reports as revenues the gross dollar amount of bulk shipments to customers' warehouses and the related costs in cost of sales. Bulk shipment transactions are arranged by the Company with its suppliers at the express direction of the customer, and involve either shipments from the supplier directly to customers' warehouse sites or shipments from the supplier to Company warehouses for immediate shipment to customers' warehouse sites. All periods presented have been reclassified to reflect the new presentation. Previously, only the gross profit related to these bulk shipments was reported in revenues. This gross profit was not material in any period presented.

 

 

4.

Borrowing Arrangements

The Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC which was declared effective on May 14, 1999 (the "1999 Registration Statement"). The 1999 Registration Statement provides the ability to the Company to offer senior and subordinated debt to the public from time to time up to an aggregate maximum principal amount of $300 million and enables the Company to effect the issuance of trust preferred securities in an amount equal to the registered amount of securities. In connection with the filing of the 1999 Registration Statement, the Company has formed Bergen Capital I (the "Trust") which was established to sell preferred securities to the public; sell common securities to the Company; use the proceeds from these sales to buy an equal amount of subordinated debt securities of the Company; and distribute the cash payments it receives on the subordinated debt securities it owns to the holders of its preferred and common securities. In turn, the Company will pay principal, premium (if any) and interest on its subordinated debt securities; and will guarantee certain payments relating to the preferred securities.

On May 26, 1999, the Trust, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued 12,000,000 shares of 7.80% Trust Originated Preferred Securities (SM) (TOPrS(SM)) (the "Preferred Securities") at $25 per security. The proceeds of such issuances were invested by the Trust in $300 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's 7.80% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Notes due June 30, 2039 (the "Subordinated Notes"). The Company used the net proceeds from the Trust for general corporate purposes, principally retirement of a portion of its outstanding debt. The Subordinated Notes represent the sole assets of the Trust and bear interest at the rate of 7.80%, payable quarterly, and are redeemable by the Company beginning in May 2004 at 100% of the principal amount thereof. The obligations of the Trust related to the Preferred Securities are guaranteed by the Company.

Holders of the Preferred Securities are entitled to cumulative cash distributions at an annual rate of 7.80% of the liquidation amount of $25 per security beginning June 30, 1999. The Preferred Securities will be redeemable upon any repayment of the Subordinated Notes at 100% of the liquidation amount beginning in May 2004.

The Company, under certain conditions, may cause the Trust to defer the payment of distributions for successive periods of up to 20 consecutive quarters. During such periods, accrued distributions on the Preferred Securities will compound quarterly at an annual rate of 7.80%. Also, during such periods, the Company may not declare or pay distributions on its capital stock; may not redeem, purchase or make a liquidation payment on any of its capital stock; and may not make interest, principal or premium payments on, or repurchase or redeem, any of its debt securities that rank equal with or junior to the Subordinated Notes.

The Subordinated Notes and the related Trust investment in the Subordinated Notes have been eliminated in consolidation and the Preferred Securities reflected as outstanding in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On April 23, 1999, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the "Senior Credit Facility") with a group of banks. The Senior Credit Facility allows borrowings of up to $600 million under a 364-day unsecured revolving line of credit to be used for general corporate purposes, including retirement of outstanding debt of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and entities which the Company may acquire in the future. The Senior Credit Facility has loan covenants which are identical to those of the Company's credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement"). There were no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 1999 under the Senior Credit Facility.

The Company's Credit Agreement, which is effective through March 2001, allows borrowings of up to $400 million and also allows borrowings under discretionary credit lines ("discretionary lines") outside of the Credit Agreement. On April 23, 1999, the Credit Agreement was amended to, among other things, allow borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement and discretionary lines were $211 million and $170 million at June 30, 1999 and September 30, 1998, respectively. The Credit Agreement has loan covenants which require the Company to maintain certain financial statement ratios. The Company is in compliance with all required ratios at June 30, 1999. The weighted average interest rate was 5.70% for borrowings outstanding at June 30, 1999. The amount of credit available to the Company under the Credit Agreement and the Senior Credit Facility is reduced dollar for dollar by the amount of outstanding Notes under the Commercial Paper Agreements (see below).

On April 14, 1999, the Company entered into a series of commercial paper dealer agreements (the "Commercial Paper Agreements") with a group of commercial paper dealers which provides for the private placement of short-term commercial paper notes of the Company (the "Notes") up to a maximum of $1 billion outstanding. Outstanding Notes under the Commercial Paper Agreements were approximately $536 million at June 30, 1999. The Commercial Paper Agreements allow maturities of up to 364 days from the date of issue and are backed by the Credit Agreement and Senior Credit Facility. The Notes may not be redeemed prior to maturity nor are they subject to voluntary prepayment. The weighted average interest rate was 5.42% for Notes outstanding at June 30, 1999.

An aggregate of $400 million of outstanding borrowings at June 30, 1999 (including $211 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement and discretionary lines and $189 million outstanding Notes under the Commercial Paper Agreements) have been classified as long-term debt based on the Company's ability to finance them on a long-term basis under the Credit Agreement.

On June 25, 1999, PharMerica Inc. ("PharMerica"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, completed an offer to purchase its 8 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the "8 3/8% Senior Notes"). Holders tendered an aggregate principal amount of $16.9 million in response to PharMerica's offer to purchase the 8 3/8% Senior Notes at a cash price equal to $1,010 per $1,000 principal amount, plus interest. The offer was required as a result of the acquisition of PharMerica by the Company on April 26, 1999 according to the terms of the indenture under which the 8 3/8% Senior Notes were issued.

The Company also filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC which became effective on March 27, 1996 (the "1996 Registration Statement"). The 1996 Registration Statement allows the Company to sell senior and subordinated debt or equity securities to the public from time to time up to an aggregate maximum principal amount of $400 million. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from any sale of such securities for general corporate purposes, which may include, without limitation, the repayment of indebtedness of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries, and entities which the Company may acquire in the future. Any offering of such securities shall be made only by means of a prospectus.

 

 

5.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share ("Basic") is computed by dividing net earnings (the numerator) by the weighted average number of shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding during each period (the denominator). Diluted earnings per share is similar to the computation for Basic, except that the denominator is increased by the dilutive effect of employees' stock options outstanding, computed using the treasury stock method.

 

 

6.

Dividends

On September 24, 1998, the Company declared a 2-for-1 stock split on the Company's Class A Common Stock ("Common Stock") which was paid on December 1, 1998 to shareowners of record on November 2, 1998. Share and per share amounts included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes are based on the increased number of shares giving retroactive effect to the stock split.

On September 24, 1998, the Company declared a $0.075 per share quarterly cash dividend on the Company's Common Stock that was paid on December 1, 1998 to shareowners of record as of November 2, 1998. This $0.075 payment constituted the Company's dividend for the first quarter ended December 31, 1998. Ordinarily the dividend for that quarter is not declared until November. However, in order to make its dividend announcement at the same time that the Company announced the 2-for-1 stock split, the Company declared this cash dividend early. For accounting purposes, this cash dividend was recorded in the fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1998, resulting in a larger than usual dividend in that quarter and no dividend during the quarter ended December 31, 1998. Regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.075 per share of Common Stock were paid on March 1 and June 1, 1999 and recorded in the second and third quarters, respectively, of fiscal 1999. In addition, on July 23, 1999, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.075 per share on the Company's Common Stock, payable September 1, 1999 to shareowners of record on August 2, 1999.

 

 

7.

Business Acquisitions

On April 26, 1999, the Company completed its acquisition of PharMerica, one of the nation's largest providers of pharmaceutical products and pharmacy management services to long-term care and alternate site settings, headquartered in Tampa, Florida. The Company issued approximately 24.7 million shares of Common Stock valued at approximately $670 million, acquired net assets (excluding debt) at fair value of approximately $335 million, assumed debt of approximately $600 million and incurred costs of approximately $25 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $960 million in the transaction.

On January 21, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Stadtlander Drug Co. ("Stadtlander"), a national leader in disease-specific pharmaceutical care delivery for transplant, HIV, infertility and serious mental illness patient populations and a leading provider of pharmaceutical care to the privatized corrections market, headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Company paid approximately $195 million in cash and issued approximately 5.7 million shares of Common Stock, previously held as Treasury shares, valued at approximately $140 million. The Company acquired net assets (excluding debt) at fair value of approximately $55 million, assumed debt of approximately $100 million and incurred costs of approximately $10 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $390 million in the transaction.

 

If the acquisitions of PharMerica and Stadtlander had occurred as of the beginning of the nine months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, unaudited pro forma net sales and other revenues, net earnings , and diluted earnings per share would have been as follows:

 

 

Nine Months Ended
June 30,


Dollars in millions, except per share amounts

1999

 

1998


Net sales and other revenues

$

15,720.4

 

 

$

13,153.7

 


Net earnings

$

103.2

 

 

$

78.3

 


Diluted earnings per share

$

0.76

 

 

$

0.59

 


 

The pro forma operating results above include the results of operations for PharMerica and Stadtlander for the nine months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 with increased goodwill amortization along with other relevant adjustments to reflect fair value of the acquired assets. Additionally, the pro forma operating results include pro forma interest expense on the assumed acquisition borrowings to finance the cash portion of the Stadtlander transaction; pro forma adjustments to provision for taxes on income to reflect, primarily, the aforementioned non-deductible goodwill amortization; and pro forma issuance of the Company's Common Stock reflected in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the computations of pro forma diluted earnings per share.

The results of operations reflected in the pro forma information above are not necessarily indicative of the results which would have been reported if the PharMerica and Stadtlander acquisitions had been effected at the beginning of the respective nine-month periods.

On February 10, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of J.M. Blanco, Inc. ("J.M. Blanco"), Puerto Rico's largest pharmaceutical distributor, headquartered in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, for a cash purchase price of approximately $30 million. The Company acquired net assets (excluding debt) at fair value of approximately $23 million, assumed debt of approximately $22 million and incurred costs of approximately $1 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $30 million in the transaction.

On December 31, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the business, assets and property, subject to certain liabilities, of Medical Initiatives, Inc. ("MII"), a pre-filler of pharmaceuticals for oncology centers, located in Tampa, Florida. The Company issued approximately 210,000 shares of Common Stock, previously held as Treasury shares, valued at approximately $6.3 million, acquired net assets at fair value of approximately $0.5 million and incurred costs of $0.2 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $6.0 million in the transaction.

The inclusion of the J.M. Blanco and MII acquisitions would not materially affect the foregoing pro forma accounts.

The amounts recorded for the aforementioned acquisitions, each of which has been accounted for as a purchase for financial reporting purposes, are subject to change after the completion of purchase accounting adjustments. The Company is in disagreement with the seller and its independent auditors regarding the valuation of the net assets of Stadtlander. If the Company is unable to settle this matter with the seller, it will be arbitrated by an independent party.

The J.M. Blanco acquisition and the cash portion of the Stadtlander acquisition were financed from borrowings under the Credit Agreement and other bank borrowings.

 

 

8.

Prior Year Special Charge

During the second quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $9.8 million ($9.8 million, net of tax, or $.09 per diluted share; no income tax benefit was recorded in the second quarter) for expenses related to the proposed merger with Cardinal Health, Inc., which was terminated on August 7, 1998. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $4.0 million related to the aforementioned merger expenses since the expenses became deductible as a result of the termination of the proposed merger.

 

 

9.

Content of Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

In the opinion of management of the Company, the foregoing consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of the Company and its subsidiaries for the periods shown and such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Results of operations for the first nine months of fiscal 1999 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any other fiscal period.

 


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

ITEM 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

 

and Results of Operations

Portions of management's discussion and analysis presented below, consisting of those statements which are not historical in nature (including, without limitation, the Company's expectations regarding its margins and the Company's Year 2000 disclosures), constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results to materially differ from those projected or implied. The most significant of such risks, uncertainties and other factors are described in Exhibit 99 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

 

Results of Operations

The Company reported significant increases in both revenues and earnings during the third fiscal quarter and nine months ended June 30, 1999 compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year. Net sales and other revenues, including bulk shipments to warehouses, increased 23% and 24% for the third quarter and nine-month period, respectively, of fiscal 1999 over the same periods of the prior year. Net earnings increased 21% for the third quarter of fiscal 1999, and increased 47% for the fiscal 1999 nine-month period.

Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of fiscal 1999 was flat compared to the third quarter of fiscal 1998 and increased 32% for the nine-month period. Due primarily to the issuance of shares of Common Stock in connection with the Stadtlander and PharMerica acquisitions, there were 24% and 11% increases in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share computation in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 1999, respectively.

The earnings of PharMerica and Stadtlander were below management's expectations during the third quarter of fiscal 1999. As a result, these acquired entities had a dilutive effect on the Company's earnings per share.

PharMerica's revenues and operating margins were significantly impacted by negative industry trends resulting from dramatically lower reimbursement to nursing homes for Medicare patients under the recently-implemented Prospective Pricing System (PPS), which, among other things: (1) lowered occupancy by Medicare-funded patients at facilities served by PharMerica, (2) significantly diminished acuity levels among residents of these facilities, and (3) increased customer pricing pressure. Management expects that the negative impact of PPS may be at least partially addressed by proposed Federal legislation, but there is no assurance that such legislation will be enacted or that its effect will bring significant relief. Management is in the process of implementing several initiatives designed to improve PharMerica's earnings, including the use of purchasing leverage through the Company's pharmaceutical bussiness' programs, the centralization of packaging operations, the consolidation of billing centers, the installation of a perpetual inventory and pricing system, and the conversion to a common AS400 computer platform. No assurances can be given that such initiatives will result in improved earnings for PharMerica.

Stadtlander's operating results were adversely impacted by an increase in the allowance for doubtful receivables during the quarter. Management is taking several steps to reduce bad debt losses, including the conversion to a new billing and accounts receivable system and the implementation of new credit controls. Revenues for Stadtlander increased significantly over the comparable prior-year quarter (when Stadtlander was under different ownership), due to growth in all major product lines, including HIV, transplant, corrections and infertility.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company's operating earnings for the third quarter and first nine months of the current and prior fiscal year and should be read in connection with the discussion below:

 

Third Quarter
Ended
June 30,



Nine Months
Ended
June 30,




%


%

Dollars in millions

1999

 

1998

Change

 

1999

 

1998

Change


Revenues excluding bulk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

shipments

$

4,454.9

$

3,513.2

27

%

$

12,716.9

$

10,053.9

26

%

Bulk shipments

 

1,048.4

 

946.4

11

 

 

2,815.2

 

2,423.1

16

 


 

Total net sales and other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

revenues

 

5,503.3

 

4,459.6

23

 

 

15,532.1

 

12,477.0

25

 

Cost of sales

 

5,176.8

 

4,270.6

21

 

 

14,753.3

 

11,926.5

24

 


 

Gross profit

 

326.5

 

189.0

73

 

 

778.8

 

550.5

41

 

Distribution, selling, general

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

& administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

expenses (DSG&A)

 

244.2

 

133.3

83

 

 

559.2

 

389.4

44

 


Operating earnings before

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

special charge

 

82.3

 

55.7

48

 

 

219.6

 

161.1

36

 

Special charge

 

-

 

-

-

 

 

-

 

9.8

-

 


 

Operating earnings

$

82.3

$

55.7

48

%

$

219.6

$

151.3

45

%


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

excluding bulk shipments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

7.33

%

5.38

%

 

 

6.12

%

5.48

%

 

 

DSG&A expenses

 

5.48

%

3.79

%

 

 

4.40

%

3.87

%

 

 

Operating earnings before

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

special charge

 

1.85

%

1.59

%

 

 

1.73

%

1.60

%

 

 

Operating earnings

 

1.85

%

1.59

%

 

 

1.73

%

1.50

%

 

 

 

Revenues

Along with other companies in its industry, the Company now reports bulk shipments of pharmaceuticals in revenues and cost of sales. Previously, only the gross profit on such bulk shipments was reported in revenues. Fiscal year 1998 amounts presented herein have been reclassified to conform with the new reporting method. Bulk shipment transactions are arranged by the Company with its suppliers at the express direction of the customer, and involve either (a) shipments from the supplier directly to the customer's warehouse or (b) shipments from the supplier to Company warehouses for immediate shipment to the customer's warehouse. Bulk sales of pharmaceuticals do not impact the Company's inventory since the Company simply processes the orders that it receives from its suppliers directly to the customers' warehouses. The Company serves as an intermediary by paying the supplier and billing the customer for the goods. Due to the insignificant margins generated through bulk shipments, fluctuations in such revenues have an immaterial impact on the Company's operating earnings.

Revenues excluding bulk shipments increased 27% and 26% in the current quarter and nine months, respectively, over the corresponding prior-year periods. The increases principally reflect internal growth within the Company's existing distribution businesses. A portion of the revenue increases for the third quarter and nine-month period was attributable to business acquisitions, principally Stadtlander and PharMerica acquired in January and April 1999, respectively. Excluding the effect of these acquired entities, consolidated revenues grew 22% and 24% for the third quarter and nine-month period ended June 30, 1999, respectively.

Revenues from the pharmaceutical business grew 20% and 22% for the third quarter and nine-month period of fiscal 1999, respectively, over the prior-year comparable periods with double-digit percentage increases across all major customer categories and geographic regions. Such increases were primarily volume-related, reflecting growth from increased shipments to existing customers as well as from shipments to new customers. A small portion of this growth was attributable to the acquisition of J.M. Blanco in February 1999, which resulted in sales into Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Revenues from the medical-surgical supply business increased 13% for both the third quarter and nine-month period of fiscal 1999 over the same periods in the prior year, primarily attributable to (a) the acquisition of Pacific Criticare, Inc. in May 1998 and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. in September 1998, which enabled this business to serve additional geographic areas and (b) shipments to new primary acute care customers. Revenues from the specialty products business increased 162% and 152% for the third quarter and nine-month period of fiscal 1999, respectively, over the prior year comparable periods, primarily reflecting growth from existing and new customers and the acquisition of Stadtlander in January 1999. The Stadtlander acquisition resulted in sales into the disease-specific pharmaceutical care delivery and privatized corrections markets. Excluding the effect of the Stadtlander acquisition, revenues from the specialty products business grew 73% and 92% in the third quarter and nine-month period ended June 30, 1999, respectively. The acquisition of PharMerica in April 1999 resulted in sales into long-term care and alternate site settings.

 

 

Gross Margins

Gross profit as a percentage of revenues excluding bulk shipments ("gross margin") was 7.33% and 5.38% for the third fiscal quarter of 1999 and 1998, respectively, and 6.12% and 5.48% for the respective nine-month periods. The overall gross margin increase for both the quarter and the nine months ended June 30, 1999 was primarily due to the higher margins in the Stadtlander and PharMerica businesses, partially offset by lower gross margins in the distribution businesses. Excluding Stadtlander and PharMerica, the consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues excluding bulk shipments would have been 5.35% and 5.29% in the current third quarter and nine-month period, respectively. For both the third quarter and nine-month period of fiscal 1999, distribution gross margins decreased principally due to a change in the sales mix, with a greater portion of revenues coming from high-volume, low-margin customers, partially offset by the effects of higher inventory investment buying.

In all of the Company's distribution businesses, it is customary to pass on manufacturers' price increases to customers. Investment buying enables distributors such as the Company to benefit by purchasing goods in advance of anticipated manufacturers' price increases. Consequently, the rate or frequency of future price increases by manufacturers, or the lack thereof, influences the profitability of the Company.

Management anticipates further downward pressure on gross margins in the distribution businesses in fiscal 1999 because of continued price competition influenced by high-volume customers. Management expects that these pressures may be offset to some extent by an increased sales mix of more profitable products and services, the Company's acquisitions of Stadtlander and PharMerica, and reduction of distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues, as described below.

 

 

Distribution, Selling, General & Administrative Expenses ("DSG&A")

DSG&A as a percentage of revenues excluding bulk shipments was 5.48% and 3.79% in the third quarter of fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively, and 4.40% and 3.87% for the nine months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increases for the third quarter and the nine-month period of the current fiscal year were primarily attributable to the Stadtlander and PharMerica businesses which experience significantly higher DSG&A expense ratios compared to the Company's distribution businesses. The effect of Stadtlander's and PharMerica's operating expenses was offset, in part, in both periods by continued operating efficiencies and the spreading of fixed costs over a larger revenue base by the Company's distribution businesses. Without the Stadtlander and PharMerica acquisitions, consolidated DSG&A as a percentage of revenues excluding bulk shipments would have been 3.52% and 3.58% in the current year quarter and nine-month period, respectively. The Company's distribution infrastructure has been able to process increasing volume without a proportionate increase in DSG&A. Also, the aforementioned shift in the distribution businesses' mix towards high-volume customers reduced the DSG&A percentage because these customers are less costly to service.

 

 

Other Income Statement Line Items

Net interest expense, including $2.2 million of distributions on the Preferred Securities, increased by $14.6 million, or 151%, compared to the prior year quarter and increased $19.8 million, or 65%, compared to the prior year nine-month period. These increases resulted principally from borrowings under the Commercial Paper Agreements, PharMerica's 8 3/8% Senior Notes, issuance of the Preferred Securities and higher average borrowings under the Credit Agreement and discretionary lines.

Taxes on income, including a $.9 million tax benefit related to distributions on the Preferred Securities, were 43.5% and 41.0% of pre-tax earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively, and 41.5% and 44.3% for the comparable nine-month periods. The increase in the effective rate in the third quarter of fiscal 1999 is primarily due to the impact of nondeductible goodwill amortization from the PharMerica acquisition. The decrease in the effective rate in the nine-month period of fiscal 1999 is primarily due to the impact of the non-deductible merger expenses recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 1998, partially offset by the aforementioned effect of the PharMerica goodwill amortization.

 

 

Prior Year Special Charge

During the second quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $9.8 million ($9.8 million, net of tax; no income tax benefit was recorded in the second quarter) for expenses related to the proposed merger with Cardinal Health, Inc., which was terminated on August 7, 1998. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $4.0 million related to the aforementioned merger expenses since such expenses became deductible as a result of the termination of the merger.

 

 

Liquidity And Capital Resources

Following is a summary of the Company's capitalization at the end of the most recent quarter and fiscal year. Except that debt is net of cash herein, these percentages are calculated in accordance with the covenants set forth in the Company's Credit Agreement and Senior Credit Facility, in which certain non-cash charges are excluded from the calculation:

 

June 30,
1999

September 30,
1998


Debt, net of cash

39%

34%

Equity

61%

66%

 

The increase in the debt percentage is mainly due to an increase in borrowings under the Credit Agreement and discretionary lines to $211 million at June 30, 1999 from $170 million at September 30, 1998 and borrowings outstanding under the Commercial Paper Agreements of approximately $536 million at June 30, 1999. Borrowings increased during the nine months ended June 30, 1999 primarily to finance a portion of the purchase price of the Stadtlander acquisition, to finance the purchase price of the J.M. Blanco acquisition and to repay certain debt assumed in connection with those acquisitions and the PharMerica acquisition.

The Company's Credit Agreement with a group of domestic and foreign banks is effective through March 2001 and provides for maximum borrowings of up to $400 million plus additional borrowings under discretionary lines outside of the Credit Agreement.

On April 23, 1999, the Company entered into its Senior Credit Facility with a group of banks and amended the Credit Agreement. The Senior Credit Facility allows borrowings of up to $600 million under a 364-day unsecured revolving line of credit to be used for general corporate purposes, including retirement of outstanding debt of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and entities which the Company may acquire in the future. The Senior Credit Facility has loan covenants which are identical to those of the Company's Credit Agreement, as amended. There were no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 1999 under the Senior Credit Facility.

On April 14, 1999, the Company entered into a series of Commercial Paper Agreements with a group of commercial paper dealers which provides for the private placement of short-term commercial paper notes of the Company up to a maximum of $1 billion outstanding. Outstanding borrowings under the Commercial Paper Agreements were approximately $536 million at June 30, 1999. The Commercial Paper Agreements allow maturities of up to 364 days from the date of issue and are backed by the Credit Agreement and Senior Credit Facility. The amount of credit available to the Company under the Credit Agreement and Senior Credit Facility is reduced dollar for dollar by the amount outstanding under the Commercial Paper Agreements.

The Company's 1999 Registration Statement, which became effective on May 14, 1999, contemplates the offering by the Company of senior and subordinated debt to the public from time to time up to an aggregate maximum principal amount of $300 million and enables the Company to effect the issuance of trust preferred securities in an amount equal to the registered amount of securities. On May 26, 1999, the Company's Trust issued 12,000,000 shares of its Preferred Securities at $25 per security. The proceeds of such issuances were invested by the Trust in $300 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's Subordinated Notes. The Company used the net proceeds from the Trust for general corporate purposes, principally retirement of a portion of its outstanding debt. The Subordinated Notes represent the sole assets of the Trust and bear interest at the rate of 7.80%, payable quarterly, and are redeemable by the Company beginning in May 2004 at 100% of the principal amount thereof. The obligations of the Trust related to the Preferred Securities are guaranteed by the Company.

The Company's 1996 Registration Statement, which became effective on March 27, 1996, allows the Company to sell senior and subordinated debt or equity securities to the public from time to time up to an aggregate maximum principal amount of $400 million.

See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Credit Agreement, the Senior Credit Facility, the Commercial Paper Agreements, the Preferred Securities and the 1999 and 1996 Registration Statements.

On September 24, 1998, the Company declared a 2-for-1 stock split on the Company's Common Stock , which was paid on December 1, 1998 to shareowners of record on November 2, 1998. All per share amounts presented herein have been restated to reflect the effect of this stock split.

Cash dividends per share paid on Common Stock amounted to $0.150 and $0.180 in the first nine months of fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively. The fiscal 1999 first quarter dividend was actually declared on September 24, 1998 (in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1998) but was not paid until December 1, 1998 to shareowners of record on November 2, 1998. The declaration was made earlier than usual in order to coincide with the announcement of the aforementioned 2-for-1 stock split. On March 1 and June 1, 1999, the Company paid regular quarterly cash dividends of $.075 per share of Common Stock. In addition, on July 23, 1999, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.075 per share on the Company's Common Stock, payable September 1, 1999 to shareowners of record on August 2, 1999.

 

The Company's cash flows during the first nine months of fiscal 1999 and 1998 are summarized in the following table:

 

Nine Months Ended
June 30,


(in millions)

1999

 

1998


Net earnings after non-cash charges

$

174.2

 

 

$

103.9

 

Increases in non-cash assets and liabilities

 

(310.2

)

 

 

(130.5

)


Cash flows from operations

 

(136.0

)

 

 

(26.6

)

Acquisition of businesses, less cash acquired

 

(238.5

)

 

 

(23.1

)

Capital expenditures

 

(27.0

)

 

 

(17.6

)

Net proceeds from trust preferred securities

 

290.4

 

 

 

-

 

Net proceeds from debt

 

182.1

 

 

 

80.0

 

Cash dividends and distributions paid

 

(28.2

)

 

 

(18.2

)

Other - net

 

(8.5

)

 

 

1.7

 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$

34.3

 

 

$

(3.8

)


 

During the periods presented, cash flows from earnings and borrowings under the Credit Agreement and discretionary lines, Commercial Paper Agreements and Preferred Securities were adequate to fund working capital increases, capital expenditures, business acquisitions and dividend and distribution payments. The Company believes that internally-generated cash flows; funds available under the Credit Agreement and discretionary lines; the Senior Credit Facility; the Commercial Paper Agreements; and funds potentially available in the private and public capital markets will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash and capital requirements. However, actual results could differ materially from this forward-looking statement as a result of unanticipated capital requirements or an inability to access the capital markets on acceptable terms when, and if, necessary.

Working capital increased to $857.2 million at June 30, 1999 from $591.4 million at September 30, 1998, primarily as a result of higher receivables and inventory balances supporting revenue growth, seasonal inventory requirements and contributions from the Stadtlander, J.M. Blanco and PharMerica acquisitions. The current ratio decreased slightly to 1.29 at June 30, 1999 from 1.31 at September 30, 1998.

Capital expenditures for fiscal 1999 and 1998 related principally to additional investments in existing locations, as well as to purchases of warehousing equipment and data processing hardware and software.

During the nine months ended June 30, 1999, the Company financed a portion of the purchase price of the Stadtlander acquisition; financed the purchase price of the J.M. Blanco acquisition; and repaid certain debt assumed in connection with these acquisitions and the PharMerica acquisition through additional borrowings on the discretionary lines and under its Credit Agreement, borrowing under the Commercial Paper Agreements and the issuance of the Preferred Securities. The Company is exploring various alternatives for the long-term financing of such acquisitions and possible refinancing of the assumed debt, including other borrowings, or possible debt or equity offerings.

 

Business Acquisitions

On April 26, 1999, the Company completed its acquisition of PharMerica. The Company issued approximately 24.7 million shares of Common Stock valued at approximately $670 million, acquired net assets (excluding debt) at fair value of approximately $335 million, assumed debt of approximately $600 million and incurred costs of approximately $25 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $960 million in the transaction.

On February 10, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of J.M. Blanco for a cash purchase price of approximately $30 million. The Company acquired net assets (excluding debt) at fair value of approximately $23 million, assumed debt of approximately $22 million and incurred costs of approximately $1 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $30 million in the transaction.

On January 21, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Stadtlander. The Company paid approximately $195 million in cash and issued approximately 5.7 million shares of Common Stock, previously held as Treasury shares, valued at approximately $140 million. The Company acquired net assets at fair value of approximately $55 million, assumed debt of approximately $100 million and incurred costs of approximately $10 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $390 million in the transaction.

On December 31, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the business, assets and property, subject to certain liabilities, of MII. The Company issued approximately 210,000 shares of Common Stock, previously held as Treasury shares, valued at approximately $6.3 million, acquired net assets at fair value of approximately $0.5 million and incurred costs of $0.2 million. The Company recorded goodwill of approximately $6.0 million in the transaction.

 

Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure

The Year 2000 problem results from computer programs and devices which do not differentiate between the year 1900 and the year 2000 because they were written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year; accordingly, computer systems that have date-sensitive calculations may not properly recognize the year 2000. This situation may cause systems to process critical financial and operational information incorrectly or not at all, which would result in significant disruptions of the Company's business activities.

Since the Company relies heavily on computer technology throughout its businesses to effectively carry out its day-to-day operations, it has made resolution of the Year 2000 problem a major corporate initiative. In October 1996, the Company established a central office to direct its companywide Year 2000 efforts for all of its business, including Bergen Brunswig Drug Company ("BBDC"), Bergen Brunswig Medical Corporation ("BBMC") and Bergen Brunswig Specialty Company ("BBSC"). A steering committee comprised of several executive officers provides top-level oversight for the program. Both internal and external resources are being used to identify, correct and test the Company's systems for Year 2000 compliance.

The Company's Year 2000 program addresses both information technology ("IT") and non-IT systems. The Company's business applications reside on mainframe, midrange and desktop computer systems. The Company's IT infrastructure is comprised of hardware, internally-developed software, and software purchased from external vendors. The Company's non-IT systems include equipment which uses date-sensitive embedded technology. Principal non-IT systems include telecommunications equipment, automated warehouse equipment, and hand-held order entry devices which the Company has provided to its customers.

The Company has divided its Year 2000 program by business unit and functional area into numerous individual projects in order to provide detailed management for each at-risk system. The Company's approach is to address each Year 2000 project in the following phases: inventory, assessment, planning, renovation, testing and certification. For BBDC, all critical systems have been tested and certified as Year 2000 compliant. During the latter half of calendar 1999, BBDC will complete the renovation and testing of the remaining IT and non-IT systems, including the replacement or upgrading of the order-entry devices used by customers. In addition, BBDC will perform comprehensive enterprise integration testing of all major IT systems, including order fulfillment, procurement, financial services and accounting.

BBMC and BBSC are comprised of a number of entities acquired during the last several years. Although some of the computer systems within these entities are Year 2000 complaint, certain significant computer systems are not Year 2000 compliant. Certain of the non-compliant systems are being remediated for Year 2000 compliance while the remainder will be replaced with Year 2000 compliant systems. It is expected that all of BBMC's and BBSC's systems will be Year 2000 compliant by October 1999, including testing and certification.

PharMerica, which was acquired on April 26, 1999, had also centralized its Year 2000 readiness efforts under an executive steering committee and a project management team prior to the acquisition, similar to the approach used by the Company. Remediation and testing efforts are well underway, and a majority of the primary dispensing systems have been certified as Year 2000 compliant. It is expected that the remainder of PharMerica's computer systems will be Year 2000 compliant by October 1999.

The Company also recognizes that it would be at risk if its suppliers, customers, banks, utilities, transportation companies and other business partners fail to properly remediate their Year 2000 systems and software. Accordingly, during calendar 1998 the Company began the process of communicating with such entities through questionnaires and other means in order to assess the status of their remediation efforts. The Company has met and will continue to meet with major business partners to discuss progress and contingencies, conduct on-site assessments, and test critical electronic interfaces. Although the Company is not aware of any significant Year 2000 problems with any of these third parties, there can be no assurances that their systems or software will be remediated in a timely manner, or that a remediation failure would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company is also subject to risk should government or private payors and insurers fail to become Year 2000 compliant and therefore be unable to make full or timely reimbursement to the Company's customers. Such a situation could have a material adverse affect on the Company's cash flows by reducing the ability of customers to pay for products purchased from the Company. A number of states have reported that only a small portion of their systems have been remediated for Year 2000 compliance to date, increasing the likelihood that at least some of such systems will not be compliant by the Year 2000; such an occurrence would adversely affect Medicaid and other governmental reimbursement programs. In addition, the federal Medicare program recently acknowledged that it is not fully Year 2000 compliant, although it expects that all of its major payment processing systems will be compliant by December 1999. Any Medicaid or Medicare failures would also have a significant impact on PharMerica, which derives more than half of its revenues from these government payors.

The Company is charging the cost of its Year 2000 program to expense as incurred, except for purchases of computer hardware and other equipment, which are capitalized as property and depreciated over the equipment's estimated useful lives in accordance with the Company's normal accounting policies. Through June 30, 1999, the Company's cumulative Year 2000 costs have amounted to approximately $12.9 million (including $1.5 million of capital expenditures). The Company's remaining costs are expected to be approximately $7.8 million (including $4.0 million of capital expenditures). The aforementioned amounts exclude (1) the costs associated with new systems which are being installed primarily to integrate operations and achieve additional information technology functionality and (2) the costs associated with the remediation efforts of PharMerica. Through June 30, 1999, PharMerica's cumulative Year 2000 costs have amounted to approximately $3.7 million (including $1.3 million of capital expenditures). PharMerica's remaining costs are expected to be approximately $2.5 million (including $1.1 million of capital expenditures).

The Year 2000 remediation effort has not had a material impact on the Company's daily operations or the development of its information technology systems. Although the aforementioned cost estimates reflect management's best judgment using current information and assumptions about the future, actual costs could vary significantly from the Company's estimates due to technological difficulties, the noncompliance of IT vendors or other third parties, and by entities that communicate with the Company, and other factors.

While the Company is not presently aware of any significant exposure that its systems and software will not be properly remediated on a timely basis, there can be no assurances that all Year 2000 remediation processes will be completed and tested before January 1, 2000 or that the contingency plans described below will sufficiently mitigate the risk of a Year 2000 compliance problem. If Year 2000 remediation efforts by the Company or third parties are unsuccessful, there could be a significant disruption of the Company's business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company is in the process of identifying the major potential failure points and the related adverse consequences associated with them, including a "reasonably worst-case scenario." As such risks are identified, the Company is developing contingency plans for conducting its business until the problems can be corrected. For example, such plans include alternative electronic and manual means of receiving, processing and shipping customer orders, purchasing inventory from suppliers, and sending and receiving cash payments. It is anticipated that contingency plans will be substantially completed by September 30, 1999, although there will be continuing follow-up activity later in calendar 1999 as January 1, 2000 approaches.

The foregoing discussion concerning the Year 2000 problem contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties (referred to above and in Exhibit 99 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999) that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Although the Company believes that minimal business disruption will occur as a result of Year 2000 issues, there is no assurance that all Year 2000 problems will be remediated in a timely manner by the Company or third parties and that any such failures will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

 

ITEM 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's most significant "market risk" exposure is the effect of changing interest rates. The Company manages its interest expense by using a combination of fixed and variable-rate debt. At June 30, 1999, the Company's debt consisted of approximately $587.2 million of fixed-rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of 7.86% and $746.8 million of variable-rate debt (consisting of borrowings under the bank Credit Agreement and discretionary lines and Commercial Paper Agreements) with a weighted average interest rate of 5.50%. The amount of the variable-rate debt fluctuates during the year based on the Company's cash requirements; maximum borrowings at any quarter end during fiscal 1999 were $757.5 million. If interest rates on such variable debt were to increase by 55 basis points (one-tenth of the rate at June 30, 1999), the net impact on the Company's results of operations and cash flows would be immaterial.

The Company also believes that its interest rate exposure may be somewhat mitigated due to the favorable effect which inflation may have on the Company, specifically, manufacturers' price inflation which may accelerate concurrent with a general increase in interest rates.

 


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There have been no new material developments in the legal proceedings as previously reported in Part I, Item 3 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 1998, except as otherwise might be set forth below.

Between August 3, 1993 and February 14, 1994, the Company, along with various other pharmaceutical industry-related companies, was named as a defendant in eight separate state antitrust actions in three courts in California. These lawsuits are more fully detailed in "Item 1 - Legal Proceedings" of Part II of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1994 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated herein by reference. In April 1994, these California state actions were all coordinated as Pharmaceutical Cases I, II and III, and assigned to a single judge in San Francisco Superior Court. On August 22, 1994, a Consolidated Amended Complaint ("California Complaint"), which supersedes and amends the eight prior complaints, was filed in these actions.

The California Complaint alleges that the Company and 35 other pharmaceutical industry-related companies violated California's Cartwright Act, Unfair Practices Act, and the Business and Professions Code unfair competition statute. The California Complaint alleges that defendants jointly and separately engaged in secret rebating, price fixing and price discrimination between plaintiffs and plaintiffs' alleged competitors who sell pharmaceuticals to patients or retail customers. Plaintiffs seek, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated California pharmacies, injunctive relief and treble damages in an amount to be determined at trial. The judge struck the class allegations from the Unfair Practices Act claims.

Between August 12, 1993 and November 29, 1993, the Company was also named in 11 separate Federal antitrust actions. All 11 actions were consolidated into one multidistrict action in the Northern District of Illinois entitled, In Re Brand-Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, No. 94 C. 897 (MDL 997). On March 7, 1994, plaintiffs in these 11 actions filed a consolidated amended class action complaint ("Federal Complaint") which amended and superseded all previously filed Federal complaints against the Company. The Federal Complaint names as defendants the Company and 30 other pharmaceutical industry-related companies. The Federal Complaint alleges, on behalf of a nationwide class of retail pharmacies, that the Company conspired with other wholesalers and manufacturers to discriminatorily fix prices in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The Federal Complaint seeks injunctive relief and treble damages. On November 15, 1994, the Federal court certified the class defined in the Federal Complaint for the time period October 15, 1989 to the present. These lawsuits are more fully detailed in "Item 1 - Legal Proceedings" of Part II of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1994 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated herein by reference.

On May 2, 1994, the Company and Durr Drug Company were named as defendants, along with 25 other pharmaceutical related-industry companies, in a state antitrust class action in the Circuit Court of Greene County, Alabama entitled Durrett v. UpJohn Company, et al., No. 94-029 ("Alabama Complaint"). The Alabama Complaint alleges on behalf of a class of Alabama retail pharmacies and a class of Alabama consumers that the defendants conspired to discriminatorily fix prices to plaintiffs at artificially high levels. The Alabama Complaint seeks injunctive relief and treble damages. On June 25, 1999, the Alabama Supreme Court held that plaintiffs' claims are not valid under the Alabama antitrust statute. Further litigation on this issue in currently pending. Similar actions were also filed against the Company and other wholesalers and manufacturers in Mississippi, Montgomery Drug v. UpJohn, et. al., No. 97-0103, and in Tennessee, Graves v. Abbott, et. al., No. 25,109-II. The various state actions have not yet been set for trial.

On October 21, 1994, the Company entered into a sharing agreement with five other wholesalers and 26 pharmaceutical manufacturers. Among other things, the agreement provides that: (a) if a judgment is entered against both the manufacturer and wholesaler defendants, the total exposure for joint and several liability of the Company is limited to $1.0 million; (b) if a settlement is entered into by, between, and among the manufacturer and wholesaler defendants, the Company has no monetary exposure for such settlement amount; (c) the six wholesaler defendants will be reimbursed by the 26 pharmaceutical defendants for related legal fees and expenses up to $9.0 million total (of which the Company will receive a proportionate share); and (d) the Company is to release certain claims which it might have had against the manufacturer defendants for the claims presented by the plaintiffs in these cases. The agreement covers the Federal court litigation, as well as the cases which have been filed in various state courts. In December 1994, plaintiffs in the Federal action had moved to set aside the agreement, but plaintiffs' motion was denied on April 25, 1995. In 1996, the class plaintiffs filed a motion for approval of a settlement with 12 of the manufacturer defendants, which would result in dismissal of claims against those manufacturers and a reduction of the potential claims against the remaining defendants, including those against the Company. The Court granted approval for the settlement. In 1998, an additional four of the manufacturer defendants settled. The effect of the settlements on the sharing agreement is that the Company's maximum potential loss would be $1.0 million, regardless of the outcome of the lawsuits, plus possible legal fee expenses in excess of the Company's proportionate share of the $9.0 million reimbursement of such fees or any additional amounts to be paid by the manufacturer defendants.

In September 1998, a jury trial of this action commenced in Federal Court. On November 30, 1998, the Court granted all remaining defendants a directed verdict, dismissing all class claims against the Company and other defendants. On July 13, 1999, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the Company and the other wholesaler defendants from the class action litigation. Plaintiffs petition for rehearing on this issue was denied on August 9, 1999.

In addition to the above-mentioned Federal class action and state court actions, the Company and other wholesale defendants have been added as defendants in a series of related antitrust lawsuits brought by certain independent pharmacies who have opted out of the class action cases and by certain chain drug and grocery stores. After a successful motion by the Company and other wholesalers, the damage period in these cases has been limited to October 1993 to the present. These lawsuits are also covered by the sharing agreement described above. Plaintiffs in these suits have requested remand to various federal courts nationwide for purposes of trial. A decision on the remand motion is pending, and no trial dates have been set.

In November 1995, in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Abbott Laboratories filed a complaint seeking damages of approximately $4.0 million against the Company and various affiliates for credits allegedly due in connection with the purchase and subsequent sale of Abbott products by the Company. In October 1998, Abbott amended its complaint to allege spoliation of evidence and to request punitive damages in excess of $30 million. The Company has filed various counterclaims and has asked for damages according to proof at trial. This matter is currently stayed pending settlement negotiations between the parties.

After discussions with counsel, management of the Company believes that any allegations of liability set forth in all of the lawsuits described above are without merit and that any attendant liability of the Company, although unlikely, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

A United States federal investigation of Stadtlander with respect to possible violations of the Medicare provisions of the Social Security Act is being conducted. The activities under investigation predated the ownership of Stadtlander by Counsel Corporation, the entity that sold Stadtlander to the Company. The Company has been advised that while owned by Counsel Corporation, Stadtlander cooperated fully with the authorities investigating this matter.

Stadtlander has also been named as a defendant in legal proceedings commenced in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, asserting, among other things, that by entering into a transaction with a third-party, Stadtlander interfered with the plaintiff's relationship with that third-party. This proceeding is in a preliminary stage. In addition, Stadtlander is a 49% equity owner of a limited liability company formed for the purpose, among other things, of operating a specialty pharmacy business to provide services to patients diagnosed with a serious mental illness. This limited liability company is governed by an operating agreement that contains, among other things, a covenant prohibiting the members from participating in certain competing activities. In April 1999, the other member of the limited liability company brought suit in California Superior Court, San Diego County, seeking, among other things, to enjoin the PharMerica merger and to recover general, special and punitive damages from the Company. The court refused to enjoin the merger; the plaintiff's demand for damages has not yet been resolved and is in the discovery stages. Counsel Corporation has agreed to provide certain indemnification to the Company with respect to the proceedings referred to in this paragraph and the immediately preceding paragraph.

In November 1998 and February 1999, two putative securities class actions were filed against PharMerica and certain individuals in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The proposed classes consist of all persons who purchased or acquired stock of PharMerica between January 7, 1998 and July 24, 1998. The complaints seek monetary damages but do not specify an amount. In general, the complaints allege that the defendants made material omissions by withholding from the market information related to the costs associated with certain acquisitions. The complaints allege claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A motion to dismiss both actions was filed on March 2, 1999, and the motion is currently under review.

PharMerica is also subject to investigations, claims and suits arising out of its institutional pharmacy business, including matters relating to the repayment of monies paid to PharMerica under Medicare or Medicaid. Prior to the acquisition of PharMerica by the Company, the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), during the course of a Medicare Audit of various nursing homes, requested PharMerica to produce records related to intravenous pharmaceuticals provided to particular nursing homes in 1997 and 1998. PharMerica cooperated with the audit and complied with the request. Subsequently, PharMerica learned that HHS auditors alleged that during the 1997-98 time frame, certain nursing homes, primarily operating in Texas, improperly billed Medicare for intravenous pharmaceuticals and related services. The government has been made aware that PharMerica did not bill the Medicare program for the goods and services it sold to nursing homes. The government has not revealed the extent of any investigation that may be ongoing against PharMerica or entities that, unlike PharMerica, billed Medicare, or any legal basis upon which to seek reimbursement from PharMerica for overpayments the government alleges the Medicare program made to customers of PharMerica.

On or about March 2, 1999, the Company was served with a Summons and Complaint filed by the Office of the State's Attorney General on behalf of the People of the State of California alleging that the Company and twenty-two other defendants engaged in the manufacture, distribution and/or selling of coal tar products to consumers within the State of California and that these activities constituted a violation of California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 and Unfair Competition Act. In addition, on or about March 20, 1999, the Company was served with a Summons and First Amended Complaint filed by Perry Gottesfeld alleging that the Company and sixteen other defendants engaged in various activities that violated the Acts cited by the State's Attorney General in the Complaint referenced above. The Company, through its counsel, has been in negotiations with both these plaintiffs. Responsive pleadings were filed in April 1999 and the parties are conducting discovery.

On or about March 5, 1999, the Company was notified that it was a possible potentially responsible party ("PRP") in connection with the Butterworth Landfill Superfund Site located in Grand Rapids, Michigan (the "Butterworth Site") and that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") had entered into a Consent Decree with five principal PRPs (not including the Company) to spend $9.6 million on immediate responsive activities at the Butterworth Site, including remedial investigation and feasibility studies. In addition and pursuant to Section 107 of the CERCLA, the U.S. Department of Interior has asserted a claim for damages caused to natural resources ("NRD Liability"). The present value of the expected remedial action at the Butterworth Site over the next thirty (30) years is in excess of $20 million. The Company was offered a settlement by the EPA whereby the Company would pay approximately $53,000 (the "Settlement Amount") in exchange for statutory contribution protection and a covenant not to sue in a Court-entered decree. The Company has tendered the Settlement Amount. The decree is expected to be entered in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999. At that time all EPA claims and NRD Liability against the Company will be released and any future contribution or cost recovery actions by other PRPs against the Company will be barred.

In addition to the Butterworth Site Claim, the EPA made a demand that the Company pay (by March 12, 1999), approximately $168,000 to settle the Company's alleged liability for waste material disposed of at the Casmalia Disposal Site in Santa Barbara County, California (the "Casmalia Site"). The present value of the expected remedial action at the Casmalia Site is $399 million. The EPA designated the Company a de minimis waste generator and offered what it termed a de minimis settlement. The Company declined the EPA's offer and believes that it may be afforded an opportunity to reduce its costs of settlement. Of course, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in reducing its cost in settling this matter or that the EPA will continue to be interested in settling with the Company for the amount previously offered.

The Company is also involved in various additional items of litigation incidental to its business. The potential outcome of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Although the amount of liability at June 30, 1999 with respect to the Company's legal proceedings cannot be ascertained, in the opinion of management, any resulting future liability will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

 

ITEM 2.

CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the nine months ended June 30, 1999, the Company issued shares of its Common Stock without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") on two occasions. On December 31, 1998, in connection with its acquisition of MII, the Company issued approximately 210,000 shares of its Common Stock to the former shareowners of MII. On January 21, 1999, in connection with its acquisition of Stadtlander, the Company issued approximately 5.7 million shares of its Common Stock to the former shareowner of Stadtlander. Such issuances were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act. In each of these instances, the privately issued shares have been registered under the 1933 Act for resale by the former shareowners of the acquired businesses.


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Annual Meeting of Shareowners of the Company was held on April 22, 1999 in Orange, California and the following matters, as described in the Proxy Statement dated March 16, 1999, were voted upon:

(a)

Proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 11, 1999, by and among the Company, Peacock Merger Corp. and PharMerica, Inc. was adopted and votes were as follows:

 

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

82,461,954

8,969,784

218,829

(b)

All of management's nominees for the Company's Board of Directors were elected (for a term ending in the year so indicated) with the following vote:

 

 

 

Nominee

For

Withheld


 

Jose E. Blanco, Sr. (2002)

95,109,701

3,223,056

 

Charles J. Lee (2002)

95,109,701

3,311,297

 

George R. Liddle (2002)

95,110,074

3,310,924

 

George E. Reinhardt , Jr. (2002)

95,181,843

3,239,155

 

Directors whose term of office continued after the Annual Meeting were: Rodney H. Brady, Neil F. Dimick, Charles C. Edwards, M.D., Robert E. Martini, James R. Mellor, Donald R. Roden and Francis G. Rodgers.

(c)

Proposal to approve the adoption of an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock from 200,000,000 to 300,000,000 was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

92,577,457

5,688,939

154,602

(d)

Proposal to approve the adoption of the 1999 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Plan was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

73,779,093

17,025,037

846,436

(e)

Proposal to approve the adoption of the 1999 Management Stock Incentive Plan was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

56,383,943

34,794,045

472,579

(f)

Proposal to approve the adoption of the 1999 Deferred Compensation Plan was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

83,216,789

7,964,180

469,598

(g)

Proposal to approve the adoption of the 1999 Management Stock Accumulation Plan was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

81,976,572

8,843,610

830,384

(h)

Proposal to approve the adoption of the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

88,560,968

2,818,708

270,891

(i)

Shareowner proposal requesting that the Board of Directors redeem the Company's Rights Agreement was approved and votes were as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Abstained


 

63,120,723

21,883,980

6,645,863


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)

EXHIBITS

 

 

 

 

10*

The Indenture for Senior Debt Securities and Indenture for Subordinated Debt Securities, both dated as of May 14, 1999, between the Company and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee are set forth as Exhibits 4.5 and 4.6 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-3/A dated May 14, 1999 (file no. 333-74349)

 

 

 

 

27

Financial Data Schedule for the nine months ended June 30, 1999.

 

 

 

 

99*

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information is set forth as Exhibit 99 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.

 

 

 

 

*

Document has heretofore been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof.

 

 

 

 

(b)

REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:

 

 

 

On July 13, 1999, a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 7, 1999, was filed, reporting under Items 5 and 7, that the Company had issued a press release announcing preliminary third quarter results.

 

 

 

On May 26, 1999, a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 26, 1999, was filed, reporting under Items 5 and 7, that Bergen Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $300 million aggregate liquidation amount of its 7.80% Trust Originated Preferred Securities (the "Preferred Securities").

 

 

 

On May 21, 1999, a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 20 1999, was filed, reporting under Items 5 and 7, that the Company and the Trust entered into an Underwriting Agreement with a group of underwriters to provide for the issuance by the Trust of $300 million aggregate liquidation amount of its Preferred Securities at a public offering price of $25 per Preferred Security.

 

 

 

On May 21, 1999, a Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated April 26, 1999, was filed, reporting under Items 2 and 7, an amendment to the reports previously filed with respect to the previously announced merger with PharMerica, dated as of April 26, 1999.

 

 

 

On April 30, 1999, a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 26, 1999, was filed, reporting under Items 2 and 7, that the Company had completed the previously announced merger with PharMerica.

 

 

 

On April 19, 1999, a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 14, 1999, was filed, reporting under Item 5, that the Company and PharMerica had been named as defendants in a lawsuit commenced on April 14, 1999 by PMR Corp.

 

 

 

[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

By

/s/ Donald R. Roden

Donald R. Roden
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

By

/s/ Neil F. Dimick

Neil F. Dimick
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

August 13, 1999

 

 

 

 


[ COVER ] | [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ]

 

 

 

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 

PAGE
NUMBER

 

 

 

10*

The Indenture for Senior Debt Securities and Indenture for Subordinated Debt Securities, both dated as of May 14, 1999, between the Company and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee are set forth as Exhibits 4.5 and 4.6 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3/A dated May 14, 1999 (file no. 333-74349).

 

 

 

 

27

Financial Data Schedule for the nine months ended June 30, 1999.

39

 

 

 

99*

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information is set forth as Exhibit 99 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Document has heretofore been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof.

 



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission