UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [Fee Required]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
or
| | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the transition period from ___________ to _____________
Commission file number 0-2085
BetzDearborn Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
PENNSYLVANIA 23-1503731
------------------------------ -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
4636 Somerton Road, Trevose, PA 19053
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (215) 355-3300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class: Name of each exchange on
which registered:
Common Stock New York Stock Exchange
- ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [ X ] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K ((section) 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of Registrant's voting common stock (Par value
$.10) held by non-affiliates of Registrant as of February 7, 1997:
$1,615,125,033
The number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's classes of
common stock as of February 7, 1997:
28,243,422 Common Shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Registrant's definitive proxy statement for use in conjunction
with Registrant's 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Registrant's 1996
Annual Report are incorporated into Parts II and III hereof.
<PAGE>
PART 1
Item 1 - BUSINESS
General
BetzDearborn Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Registrant") is engaged in the
engineered chemical treatment of water, wastewater and process systems operating
in a wide variety of industrial and commercial applications, with particular
emphasis on the chemical, petroleum refining, paper, automotive, electric
utility and steel industries. Registrant produces and sells a wide range of
specialty chemical products, and provides the technical expertise necessary to
utilize these products effectively. Chemical treatment programs are developed
for use in boilers, cooling systems, heat exchangers, paper and petroleum
process streams and both influent and effluent systems. Registrant monitors
changing water, process and plant operating conditions so as to prescribe the
appropriate treatment programs to solve problems such as corrosion, scale,
deposit formation and a variety of process problems.
Registrant has twelve (12) production plants in the United States and
nineteen (19) in countries outside the United States. Operations are conducted
primarily in the United States, Canada and Europe, and also in Asia-Pacific and
Latin America. Registrant employs approximately 6,185 people worldwide.
Acquisition of Dearborn
On June 28, 1996, pursuant to the Grace Dearborn Worldwide Purchase and
Sale Agreement (the "Agreement"), the Registrant acquired (the "Acquisition")
the Dearborn business unit ("Dearborn") of W. R. Grace & Co. - Conn. for $632
million, subject to certain adjustments. (See Note 2 to Consolidated Financial
Statements.) Dearborn is a global supplier of industrial water and process
treatment specialty chemicals with 1995 annual net revenues of $399.1 million,
approximately 75% of which were recorded by operations outside the United
States. Immediately following the Acquisition, the Registrant changed its name
from Betz Laboratories, Inc. to BetzDearborn Inc.
The Acquisition combines the second and third largest global suppliers of
engineered programs and advanced specialty chemical treatments for water,
wastewater and process systems operating in a wide variety of industrial,
commercial, and institutional applications. This combination enabled the
Registrant to surpass its long-term goal of developing non-U.S. sales to at
least 40% of revenues by 1999. International operations now account for almost
50% of annualized revenues, up from 28% in 1995.
Marketing
BetzDearborn Water Management Group provides all of Registrant's water and
wastewater technology worldwide. This unit provides specialty water treatment
programs for boiler, cooling, influent and effluent applications to its
principal markets such as refining, chemical, paper, electric utility, food,
light industrial, commercial and institutional establishments. BetzDearborn
Water Management Group accounts for 63.8% of Registrant's 1996 worldwide sales.
BetzDearborn Paper Process Group serves the global pulp and paper industry.
This unit formulates custom engineered programs for the process-related problems
associated with paper production. Deposition, corrosion, microbiological
fouling, foam control, de-inking and felt conditioning are other problems
associated with pulp and paper production that are treated by BetzDearborn Paper
Process Group technology.
<PAGE>
BetzDearborn Hydrocarbon Process Group develops specific products used in
process streams in the worldwide refining, petrochemical and gas production
industries. These products are "process-side" treatments as compared to
"water-side" treatments and are formulated to reduce production inefficiencies
in large industrial plants. This technology is applied in many ways including
controlling corrosion with effective inhibitors and controlling fouling in heat
exchangers through trace metal deactivation, polymer retardants, foam control,
and oxidation control.
BetzDearborn Metals Process Group serves steel, aluminum and plastic
producers, and the related transportation, machinery, appliances, fabricated
parts and coil industries. Its products and process-related treatment programs
are designed for cleaning, passivation, conversion coating, paint
detackification and storage of metals and metal parts.
These global business units are responsible for research and development,
technology commercialization, sales and marketing worldwide. They are supported
by regional centers in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America and North America.
The Paper, Hydrocarbon and Metals Process Groups are collectively referred to as
the global business units providing process treatment programs, and account for
36.2% of Registrant's 1996 worldwide sales.
Technical sales representatives working in each of the Registrant's global
business units assist in the development of engineered programs to meet a
customer's needs. Such programs are custom designed to conserve energy, minimize
corrosion and deposits, control microbiological fouling, reduce waste
generation, improve process efficiency or any combination of the above,
depending on the customer's requirements. Technical sales representatives also
train customer operating personnel in the controlling, testing and chemical
feeding required in applying Registrant's treatment programs. Since plant
operating conditions and intake water characteristics do not remain static, the
technical sales representatives make regularly scheduled plant follow-up visits
to monitor the treatment program results and help customer operating personnel.
To ensure treatment effectiveness, Registrant's sales representatives may
draw upon technical support and application management tools such as
computerized condensate modeling programs, Action Alert(R) statistical process
control software or laptop-based Application Atlas(R) account management tools.
Worldwide, Registrant has approximately 2,570 Regional Managers, District
Managers and Technical Sales Representatives selling and servicing its chemical
technologies.
Registrant's worldwide sales of specialty chemicals and the above-related
products during 1996 amounted to $1,037.0 million, as compared to $752.5 million
in 1995 and $708.3 million in 1994, and in each case constituted 100% of
Registrant's consolidated net sales. Consolidated net earnings for 1996 were
$64.3 million, as compared to $68.3 million in 1995 and $73.2 million in 1994.
Non-U.S. Operations
Registrant has significantly expanded its international operations as a
result of the acquisition of Dearborn. Registrant now conducts its non-U.S.
activities through subsidiaries and divisions in thirty-four (34) non-U.S.
locations. Registrant has North American subsidiaries in Canada and Mexico. In
Europe, Registrant operates subsidiaries and divisions located in Austria,
Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. In Latin America, Registrant has
subsidiaries and divisions located in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela. In the Asia-Pacific region, Registrant
conducts activities through subsidiaries and divisions located in Australia,
Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, South
<PAGE>
Africa, Taiwan and Thailand. In the Middle East, Registrant operates a
subsidiary in Saudi Arabia.
Although Registrant does not believe that its non-U.S. operations are
presently subject to a materially greater risk than its U.S. operations,
Registrant's non-U.S. operations may at any time be adversely affected by
conditions outside its control including economic and political conditions. See
Notes 1, 2, 3 and 4 to Consolidated Financial Statements for certain additional
information pertaining to these operations.
The range of products sold by Registrant to customers located outside of
the United States is substantially similar to, although not as broad in scope
as, those sold in the United States. Products and services sold to non-U.S.
markets during 1996 accounted for approximately $395.9 million or 38.2% of
Registrant's consolidated net sales, as compared to $196.6 million (26.1%) in
1995 and $156.8 million (22.1%) in 1994. Direct export sales of $11.2 million
(1.1%), to $10.8 million (1.4%) and $13.6 million (1.9%) for 1996, 1995 and
1994, respectively, are not included in non-U.S. net sales. The operating
earnings of Registrant's non-U.S. subsidiaries in 1996 were $35.3 million or
3.4% of Registrant's consolidated net sales as compared to $31.4 million (4.2%)
in 1995 and $22.7 million (3.2%) in 1994.
Approximately $702.0 million or 49.5% of Registrant's identifiable assets
are attributable to its U.S. operations, and $716.3 million or 50.5% are
attributable to its non-U.S. operations.
Production and Distribution
Many of Registrant's products are produced at more than one of the
thirty-one (31) production plants referred to under Item 2 ("Properties"). The
particular plant from which a customer's needs are filled is generally
determined on the basis of economy of freight. Most shipments to customers are
made by common carriers and Registrant-owned vehicles. Under Registrant's own
liquid distribution program, formulated products are delivered directly by
custom-built vehicles owned by Registrant to tanks owned by Registrant or the
customer at the customer's site. This "BetzDearborn Point of Feed(R) Delivery
(POF(R)) Service" reduces the storage and handling costs of the Registrant's
customers.
The "BetzDearborn Semi-Bulk Control"(R) program is a distribution system to
augment its "Point of Feed" and drum distribution programs. It is used by all of
Registrant's marketing units to serve their respective markets and involves the
delivery of a restricted line of the Registrant's products to customer locations
in stackable, returnable, reusable 300 and 400 gallon containers. This
"BetzDearborn Semi-Bulk Control" program offers greater convenience to those of
the Registrant's customers whose volume demand or other considerations make
unavailable "BetzDearborn Point of Feed Delivery Service," but who desire
delivery in other than drums.
In addition, Registrant operates a "Custom Distribution Service" (CDS(R))
that offers the "BetzDearborn Point of Feed Delivery Service" to some of
Registrant's customers with smaller quantity requirements. All three of the
above distribution systems eliminate the need for the handling, storage and
cleaning of chemical drums.
As most of Registrant's chemical products are shipped to customers within
one week of the receipt of specific purchase orders, Registrant has no
significant backlog of orders.
Raw Materials
Most of the chemicals used by the Registrant as raw materials are standard
commercial products available from two or more sources. Some of these chemicals
are
<PAGE>
produced by Registrant. Registrant's inventories of raw materials vary
according to the availability of and need for such raw materials. Management
believes that the loss of any single source of supply would not have a
materially adverse effect on its business.
The Registrant cannot presently estimate the effect which energy problems,
inflation or recession and resulting economic uncertainties may have upon its
customers, upon such customers' possible future purchases of Registrant's
products, upon future prices of raw materials purchased by Registrant or upon
future selling prices of Registrant's products and services.
Research and Development - Patents, Trademarks and Licenses
For many years the Registrant has pursued a research and development
program which has resulted in the improvement of existing products and the
development of new products. Although Registrant does not segregate such
research and development expenditures from total laboratory and engineering
costs, it estimates that expenditures for research and development during 1996
amounted to approximately $35.7 million as compared with approximately $32.2
million during 1995 and $29.8 million during 1994. All of these activities were
sponsored and paid for by the Registrant. Such activities were carried out in
1996 by approximately 650 professional and technical employees as compared with
approximately 496 and 508 professional and technical employees in 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
As a result of its research efforts, Registrant has produced numerous
chemicals, chemical formulations and equipment for which it has secured letters
patent and others for which Registrant is presently seeking letters patent.
Registrant also has registered various of its trademarks. As a result of the
Acquisition, Registrant acquired additional patents, trademarks, and tradenames
having an appraised value of $82.6 million. Patents are amortized on a straight
line basis over 13 to 15 years, and unlimited-life trademarks and tradenames are
amortized over 40 years. Registrant also has certain licensing agreements with
third parties whereby Registrant has authorized others to make use of and/or
sell Registrant's products or whereby Registrant has obtained such authorization
with respect to the products of others. Such licensing agreements are not
material.
Under United States law each letter patent is effective for 17 years from
the date of grant. Generally, trademark registrations are valid so long as the
trademarks registered are used and renewal of the registration is timely made.
Registrant's rights under its licensing agreements expire at various times in
accordance with the respective terms of such agreements. Because of the highly
competitive nature of the specialty chemical industry and the uniqueness of
Registrant's technology in the industry, Registrant considers its rights under
its patents, trademarks, and licensing agreements to be valuable assets.
Competition
Although the Acquisition and other acquisitions in the industry reduced the
number of competitors, Registrant's business remains highly competitive.
Competition is furnished by many large and small companies which compete with
Registrant to varying degrees throughout the world. The large competitors are
also engaged in business areas which are not in competition with Registrant, and
they do not publish sales and earnings figures which would make direct
comparisons possible.
However, on the basis of its experience in the industry and its estimates
of sales of comparable chemical products, Registrant believes that it is one of
the largest worldwide suppliers of such products. Registrant believes that it
competes effectively with its major competitors both as to service and price.
From time to time, Registrant has instituted price
<PAGE>
increases on its products to cover increased costs; however, Registrant
does not believe that such increases have affected its ability to compete
effectively. Registrant believes that its 1996 experience with respect to
increased costs was similar to that of its competitors.
Environmental Legislation
Registrant believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with
all applicable Federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and
regulations. In those instances where the Registrant has taken affirmative
action to insure compliance with applicable laws or regulations, such actions
have had no material effect on the earnings or competitive position of
Registrant.
Federal, state and foreign pollution and waste control legislation
governing the disposal of industrial and hazardous wastes confer broad powers on
the administrative personnel charged with their enforcement. The interpretation
and enforcement of such laws govern the amount and manner of disposal of many of
the chemicals used by industry, including some chemical products presently sold
by Registrant and its competitors. It is possible that some of such products
will no longer be able to be used unless the industrial users install their own
waste treatment plants or otherwise provide for disposition of their wastes.
These laws also impose heavy fines against manufacturers of chemicals or
carriers of chemicals, or both, if as a result of an accident, even if beyond
the control of the manufacturer or carrier, those chemicals spill into a river,
lake or other navigable water. Such manufacturers may also be ultimately
responsible for the cost of cleaning up any such spill.
While Registrant does not anticipate that it will incur substantial costs
in complying with existing environmental legislation, Registrant is unable to
predict the effect of existing or future Federal, state or local environmental
legislation or regulation on the Registrant's U.S. or non-U.S. business. (See
"Pending Legal Proceedings," page 10.)
Item 2 - PROPERTIES
The Registrant's principal facilities are at the following locations:
U.S. Facilities
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Square
Owned Footage
or of
Location Leased Facility General Character
-------- ------ -------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Bakersfield, California Owned 55,000 Office, Plant and
Warehouse
Long Beach, California Owned 13,000 Office
Jacksonville, Florida Owned 117,000 Office and Laboratory
Macon, Georgia Owned 71,000 Plant and Warehouse
Addison, Illinois Owned 118,800 Plant and Warehouse
Lake Zurich, Illinois Owned 141,000 Office, Plant, Warehouse
and Laboratory
Reserve, Louisiana Owned 24,000 Plant and Warehouse
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Square
Owned Footage
or of
Location Leased Facility General Character
-------- ------ -------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
New Philadelphia, Ohio Owned 108,000 Plant and Warehouse
Langhorne, Pennsylvania Owned 212,000 Plant and Warehouse
Horsham, Pennsylvania Owned 126,000 Office and Limited
Production
Horsham, Pennsylvania Owned 100,000 Office
Trevose, Pennsylvania Owned 198,000 Headquarters
Owned 46,500 W. H. and L. D. Betz
Research Center
Owned 50,000 Training Center,
Warehouse and
Maintenance Bldg.
Owned 81,000 J. D. Betz Engineering
Laboratory and BetzDearborn
Water Management
Group Laboratory
Puerto Rico Leased 12,000 Office and Warehouse
Beaumont, Texas Owned 82,000 Plant, Warehouse and
Office
Fort Worth, Texas(1) Owned 34,500 Plant and Warehouse
Garland, Texas Owned 45,000 Plant and Warehouse
Orange, Texas Owned 53,000 Plant and Warehouse
South Houston, Texas Owned 25,000 Plant and Warehouse
South Houston, Texas Owned 10,000 Sales Office
The Woodlands, Texas Owned 120,000 Laboratory and Office
Washougal, Washington Owned 46,000 Plant and Warehouse
Cheyenne, Wyoming(1) Owned 35,800 Plant and Warehouse
Non-U.S. Facilities
-------------------
Ingleburn, New South Wales, Owned 31,900 Office, Plant, Warehouse
Australia and Laboratory
Haasrode, Belgium Owned 38,500 Office and Laboratory
Herentals, Belgium Owned 43,800 Office, Plant and
Laboratory
Herentals, Belgium Owned 11,500 Office
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Square
Owned Footage
or of
Location Leased Facility General Character
-------- ------ -------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Hoboken, Antwerp, Belgium(1) Owned 46,000 Office and Laboratory
Cotia, Brazil Owned 27,000 Office and Laboratory
Sorocaba, Brazil Owned 87,200 Plant and Warehouse
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Owned 61,000 Plant, Warehouse and
Laboratory
Fort Saskatchewan Owned 28,000 Plant and Warehouse
Saskatchewan, Canada(1)
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Owned 77,500 Plant, Warehouse and
Laboratory
Pointe Claire, Quebec, Canada Owned 90,000 Office and Plant
Kanata, Ontario, Canada(1) Owned 43,000 Office and Laboratory
Pudahuel, Santiago, Chile Owned 25,800 Plant and Warehouse
Winsford, England(1) Owned 49,000 Office, Plant and
Laboratory
Crissey, France Owned 48,000 Office and Plant
Marne la Vallee, France Owned 26,000 Office and Laboratory
Heidelberg, Germany(1) Owned 69,000 Plant and Warehouse
Willich, Germany Owned 15,000 Office and Laboratory
Ferentino, Italy Owned 35,700 Office, Plant and
Laboratory
Qualiano, Italy Owned 25,300 Office, Plant and
Laboratory
Rome, Italy Owned 18,200 Office
Iri, Korea Owned 22,700 Office, Plant
and Laboratory
Singapore(2) Owned/ 26,300 Office, Plant,
Lease Warehouse and
Laboratory
Wynberg, South Africa Leased 9,700 Plant and Warehouse
Castellbisbal, Spain Owned 12,600 Office, Plant
and Warehouse
Helsingborg, Sweden Owned 261,000 Plant and Warehouse
Kilafors, Sweden Owned 8,600 Plant and Warehouse
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Square
Owned Footage
or of
Location Leased Facility General Character
-------- ------ -------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Taipei, Taiwan Owned 33,200 Office, Plant,
Warehouse and
Laboratory
Widnes, United Kingdom Owned 105,000 Plant and Warehouse
Valencia, Venezuela Owned 8,600 Plant and Warehouse
</TABLE>
The Registrant believes that the present production capacity of its plants
is adequate to meet its present and reasonably anticipated worldwide needs.
In addition to owned facilities, the Registrant leases numerous office
facilities throughout the world from which its local sales efforts are
conducted.
(1) Location closed in 1996 and scheduled for sale in 1997. See Note
11--Integration/Restructuring in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(2) In accordance with local law and custom, Registrant owns the Singapore
facility but presently holds the land upon which the facility is situated
under a 30-year lease which expires in August, 2009. At such time as the
lease lapses without being renewed, the office, plant and warehouse would
become the property of the Singapore government. Registrant would receive
no compensation therefor.
Item 3 - PENDING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine
litigation incidental to the business of the Registrant to which the Registrant
or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is the
subject.
The Registrant is a "Potentially Responsible Party" ("PRP") under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA")
as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act ("SARA") with
respect to ten (10) sites at which alleged releases or threatened releases of
hazardous substances into the environment may have occurred. In response, the
Registrant has been voluntarily participating with other PRPs at each of these
sites to familiarize itself with site conditions, determine the nature and
extent of contamination, analyze alternatives for remediation and develop a plan
for clean-up. In each instance, the Registrant has participated in discussions
with representatives of the EPA and other PRPs to determine its potential
liability for financing necessary response actions. Although it is impossible to
determine the exact cost of response activities, present information and the
likelihood of contributions from other PRPs at each site indicates that the
Registrant's ultimate share of remediation costs at seven (7) of the ten (10)
sites will be less than $100,000 of the total anticipated response cost.
At the Operating Industries, Inc. site, Monterey Park, California (the
"Site"), the Registrant is a signatory to two Partial Consent Decrees among the
United States of America, the State of California, the California Hazardous
Substance Account and approximately four hundred (400) other parties entered in
the United States District Court for the Central District of California in 1989
and 1992, respectively. Pursuant to such Partial Consent Decrees, the parties
are performing remedial activities at the Site in response to alleged releases
and threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment. The
Registrant, without admitting liability, agreed to an allocation of costs of
approximately $279,000 to be paid over a period of seven (7) years pursuant to
the 1989 Partial Consent Decree. Pursuant to the 1992 Partial Consent Decree,
the Registrant agreed to pay a portion of state and federal past costs and
perform necessary remedial work, and pay for oversight of such work. It is
estimated that Registrant's future allocation will be approximately $180,000
payable over the next five to seven years. Such amount, if ultimately assessed
and paid, would not be material to the business of the Registrant.
The Registrant is a third party defendant in two actions commenced in the
Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey in 1989 involving the
Helen Kramer Landfill site in Mantua Township, New Jersey. It is alleged that
the Registrant's wastes were shipped to the site from 1968 to 1971 and that two
loads of municipal solid waste were sent to the site in 1981. The EPA and New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection claims for past and future costs
total approximately $160 million. The Registrant is participating with other
defendants to develop an allocation plan to share site costs and is
participating in a court annexed mediation process. If remedial costs exceed
$160 million, the Registrant's allocation may exceed $900,000; however, such
allocation is speculative and would not materially affect the Registrant's
financial condition or results of operations. Presently, no final allocation of
costs has been determined among the PRPs, and the Registrant's ultimate final
allocation is still speculative.
The Registrant is a counterclaim defendant in a lawsuit commenced in the
Federal District Court of the Southern District of West Virginia in April, 1994,
by EPA seeking recovery of response costs incurred at the Artel Chemical
Corporation Site in Kanawha and Putnam Counties, West Virginia. There is a total
of 57 companies in the litigation. It is alleged that the Registrant used this
site for the blending of certain anti-freeze chemicals used in the coal mining
business. In April, 1996, Registrant executed a Consent Decree in which it will
resolve its alleged liability by paying a percentage of costs associated with
remediating the site. Pursuant to present estimates, the Registrant's share will
be approximately $440,000 payable over a period of two (2) to five (5) years.
Such allocation will not materially affect the Registrant's financial condition
or results of operations.
The Registrant is a secondary defendant in the case of Katherine Adams, et
al. v. Pacific Gas and Electric, ("PG&E") et al. commenced October, 1994 in the
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs seek money
damages for alleged exposures to chromate-based products sold by Registrant to
PG&E for use in a cooling tower between 1952 and 1966. PG&E apparently released
the water from the cooling tower to an unlined pond which in turn caused
contamination of the groundwater. Registrant has been advised that PG&E has
entered into a settlement agreement with the Plaintiffs. Registrant denies any
legal liability to plaintiffs for the acts of PG&E. Registrant also believes
that it would be entitled to offset its liability, if any, against the PG&E
settlement amount, and that adequate insurance coverage exists which would make
recovery of damages, if any, by the plaintiffs unlikely to materially affect the
Registrant's financial condition or results of operations.
The Registrant is a defendant in the case of Danny Aguayo, et al. v. Betz
Laboratories, Inc., et al. commenced September, 1995 in the Superior Court of
California, County of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs herein also seek money damages for
alleged exposure to chromate-based products sold by Registrant to PG&E for use
in cooling towers between 1952 and 1972. Plaintiffs allege exposure arising out
of the release of such products into groundwater and cooling tower drift as a
result of the customary use of chromate-based products by PG&E. Registrant
denies any legal liability to plaintiffs. Registrant also believes that adequate
insurance coverage exists which would make recovery of damages, if any, by
plaintiffs unlikely to materially affect Registrant's financial condition or
results of operations.
Item 4 - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Registrant's security holders
through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of
the fiscal year to which this report relates.
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5 - MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED
SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
Pursuant to General Instruction G(2) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 5,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the information contained in Note 12
to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Quarterly Financial Information
(Unaudited)," under the captions "Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share" and
"Common Share Market Prices" on page 41 of Registrant's 1996 Annual Report to
its Shareholders.
Item 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Pursuant to General Instruction G(2) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 6,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the following information contained
under the heading "Consolidated Summary of Operations" on pages 42 and 43 of
Registrant's 1996 Annual Report to its Shareholders: For Fiscal Years 1992
through 1996, both inclusive, the information under the headings "Net Sales,"
"Net Earnings," "Earnings per Common Share," "Cash Dividends Declared per Common
Share," "Total assets," and "Long-term debt."
Item 7 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Pursuant to General Instruction G(2) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 7,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the information contained under the
heading "Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results
Of Operations" on pages 23 through 26 of Registrant's 1996 Annual Report to its
Shareholders.
Item 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Pursuant to General Instruction G(2) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 8,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the consolidated financial
statements included on pages 27 through 41, both inclusive, of Registrant's 1996
Annual Report to its Shareholders.
Item 9 - DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
Item 10 - DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 10,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the information contained under the
heading "Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors" on pages 4 through 6, inclusive,
and "Executive Officers" on page 8 of Registrant's definitive proxy statement to
be used in connection with Registrant's 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 10, 1997.
<PAGE>
Item 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 11,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the information contained under the
headings "Remuneration of Directors" on page 10, "Compensation Committee Report
on Executive Compensation" on pages 11 through 14, both inclusive, "Executive
Compensation" on pages 15 through 17, both inclusive, "Pension Plan Table" on
page 20, and "Employment Agreements" on pages 20 and 21 of Registrant's
definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with Registrant's 1997
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about March 10, 1997.
Item 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, in response to Item 12,
Registrant hereby incorporates by reference the information contained under the
heading "Ownership of Company Shares" on pages 9 and 10 of Registrant's
definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with Registrant's 1997
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about March 10, 1997.
Item 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None.
PART IV
Item 14 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a. 1. and 2. The following consolidated financial statements of BetzDearborn
Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report of Registrant to its
Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 1996, are incorporated by
reference in Item 8:
Annual
Report
Page(s)
-------
Consolidated Statements of Operations--Years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 27
Consolidated Balance Sheets--December 31, 1996 and 1995 28-29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 30
Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders'
Equity--Years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 31
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 32-41
<PAGE>
The following consolidated financial statement schedule of BetzDearborn
Inc. and subsidiaries is included in Item 14(a):
Form 10-K
Pages
-----
Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 16 (F-1)
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore
have been omitted.
3. Listing of Exhibits.
Form 10-K
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
<S> <C> <C>
3 Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
*
* The items designated Exhibit 3 to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 1988,
(Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of
BetzDearborn Inc.) as heretofore filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission are hereby incorporated by
reference as Exhibit 3 hereto.
4 Instruments defining the rights of Security Holders *
* See Exhibit 3 hereto.
10 Material Contracts *
* The items designated Exhibit 10 to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 1992 ("Guidelines For
BetzDearborn Inc. Corporate Discretionary Senior
Executive Officer Bonus Plan; Corporate Discretionary
Executive Officer Bonus Plan; Corporate Discretionary
Officer Bonus Plan; and Corporate Discretionary Key
Employee Bonus Plan"); the item designated as Exhibit A
to Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement dated March
8, 1995 ("Stock Incentive Plan"); and the item
designated Exhibit A to Registrant's definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 10, 1997 ("Stock Option Plan of
1987"); the item designated as Exhibit 2.1 to
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on
March 29, 1996 (Grace Dearborn Worldwide Purchase and
Sale Agreement, dated as of March 11, 1996 by and
between W. R. Grace and Co.-Conn. and the Registrant);
the item designated as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 12, 1996
(Credit Agreement, dated as of June 20, 1996, by and
among the Registrant, Betz Canada Inc., the banks
parties thereto, and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of
New York, as Agent); all as heretofore filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission are hereby
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10 hereto.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit No. Description Page
----------- ----------- ----
<S> <C> <C>
11 Statement regarding computation of per share earnings 17
13 Registrant's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders 18
[only those portions specifically incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K are to be deemed as filed with the
Commission].
21 Subsidiaries of Registrant 68
23 Consent of Independent Auditors 70
27 Financial Data Schedule 71
</TABLE>
b. Reports on Form 8-K
None
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BETZDEARBORN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
(In thousands)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL. A COL. B. COL. C COL. D COL. E.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONS
---------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION BALANCE AT BEGINNING (1) (2)
OF PERIOD CHARGED TO COSTS CHARGED TO OTHER DEDUCTIONS -- BALANCE AT END
AND EXPENSES ACCOUNTS -- DESCRIBE DESCRIBE OF PERIOD
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts Receivable
deducted from Trade
Accounts Receivable:
Year Ended
December 31, 1996 $2,886 $1,319 $4,366 (B) $999 (A) $7,572
=========== =========== ========= ========== ===========
Year Ended
December 31, 1995 $2,693 $434 $122 (B) $363 (A) $2,886
=========== =========== ========= ========== ===========
Year Ended
December 31, 1994 $2,698 $322 $ - $327 (A) $2,693
=========== =========== ========= ========== ===========
</TABLE>
(A) Principally accounts written off.
(B) Acquisition of Dearborn in 1996 and the Misan Group in 1995.
<PAGE>
FINANCIAL REPORT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:
The management of BetzDearborn Inc. is responsible for the preparation
and presentation of the financial statements and other financial information
contained in this Annual Report. The financial statements include amounts that
are based on management's best estimates and judgments. These statements have
been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors.
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain adequate accounting systems
and financial controls. The quality and scope of our accounting systems and
financial controls are augmented by ongoing internal audit programs. In
addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors periodically meets with
management, our internal audit group and representatives of Ernst & Young LLP to
discuss financial reporting matters as well as to review auditing and internal
control procedures.
George L. James III
Vice President - Finance
Chief Financial Officer
February 11, 1997
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
BetzDearborn Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
BetzDearborn Inc. (formerly Betz Laboratories, Inc.) as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, common
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
BetzDearborn Inc. at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 11, 1997
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BetzDearborn Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACQUISITION OF DEARBORN
On June 28, 1996, pursuant to the Grace Dearborn Worldwide Purchase and
Sale Agreement (the "Agreement"), the Company acquired (the "Acquisition") the
Dearborn business unit ("Dearborn") of W.R. Grace & Co. - Conn. ("Grace") for
$632 million, subject to certain adjustments. Dearborn is a global supplier of
industrial water and process treatment specialty chemicals with 1995 annual net
revenues of $399.1 million, approximately 75% of which were recorded by
operations outside the United States. The Acquisition was financed by a $750
million Revolving Credit Agreement among the Company and a syndicate of banks.
Immediately following the Acquisition, the Company changed its name from Betz
Laboratories, Inc. to BetzDearborn Inc.
The Acquisition combines the second and third largest global suppliers
of engineered programs and advanced specialty chemical treatments for water,
wastewater and process systems operating in a wide variety of industrial,
commercial, and institutional applications. The Company consists of four global
business units:
o BetzDearborn Water Management Group, providing water treatment programs
to industrial, commercial and institutional establishments and
headquartered in Horsham, Pennsylvania;
o BetzDearborn Paper Process Group, providing process treatment programs
to the pulp and paper industry and headquartered in Jacksonville,
Florida;
o BetzDearborn Hydrocarbon Process Group, providing process treatment
programs to the refining, petrochemical and steel industries and
headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas; and
o BetzDearborn Metals Process Group, serving the metals and plastics
finishing industries and headquartered in Horsham, Pennsylvania.
These global business units are responsible for research and development,
technology commercialization, sales and marketing. They are supported by
regional centers in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America and North America. The
Paper, Hydrocarbon and Metals Process Groups are collectively referred to as the
global business units providing process treatment programs.
The Acquisition is accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and is included in the consolidated statement of operations since the
date of acquisition. The Company adopted a November 30 fiscal year end for
non-U.S. Dearborn units, except Canada, to align the fiscal year end with the
remainder of the Company's operations. Consequently, Dearborn units, except the
U.S. and Canada, reported five months of results of operations in 1996. The
Company intends to completely integrate the two companies, which will make it
impractical in the future to report the results of Dearborn separately from the
remainder of the Company's results of operations.
<PAGE>
In accordance with the purchase method, the adjusted purchase price was
allocated to the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, with the excess
recorded as goodwill. Of the purchase price, $82.6 million was allocated to
identifiable intangibles representing the independently appraised value of the
trademarks, trade names and patents of Dearborn. Estimated goodwill of $420.4
million was recorded, which is amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years.
Annualized intangible amortization expense approximates $14.4 million and $6.7
million is included in the 1996 results of operations.
Although the purchase price allocation is substantially complete, the
estimated goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date is subject to further
adjustment as a result of a number of factors such as: a final working capital
adjustment; further potential closures of Dearborn facilities; final
determination of the adequacy of reserves sufficient to meet all liabilities
assumed under the Agreement; further adjustments to estimated tax effects; and
potential adjustments to the fair value of assets acquired. The Company expects
to finalize the purchase accounting and resulting goodwill determination no
later than the second quarter of 1997.
The Company expects to incur annual interest expense of $45 million to
$50 million as a result of the Acquisition financing. In 1996, $24.1 million of
Acquisition-related interest expense was included in the results of operations.
As a result of the Acquisition, the Company's exposure to foreign
currency translation risk has increased. Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements sets forth the Company's geographic information and note 1 discloses
the impact of translation on the consolidated financial statements. With the
increase in significance of foreign operations, reported U.S. dollar sales and
income will be subjected to more unpredictable fluctuation from exchange rate
movements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- 1996 vs. 1995
Net Sales increased 38% from $752.5 million in 1995 to a record
$1,037.0 million in 1996. Sales in the U.S. increased 16% accompanied by a 96%
increase in non-U.S. sales over the prior year. All four global business units
posted solid performance and reported record sales, exclusive of the sales
resulting from the Acquisition. This performance reaffirms our belief in the
strategic decision in 1993 to globalize our business units. Net earnings and
fully diluted earnings per share, excluding the provisions for
integration/restructuring, for 1996 were $84.4 million and $2.65, respectively,
compared to $77.9 million and $2.47 in 1995. Including integration/restructuring
costs, net earnings and fully diluted earnings per share were $64.3 million and
$2.00, respectively, compared to $68.3 million and $2.16 in 1995.
The 38% increase in sales over the 1995 level was mainly due to an
estimated 29% growth as a result of acquisitions. It also included an estimated
7% increase in volume-mix, a 1% rise in selling prices and a 1% increase due to
the inclusion of certain freight revenues in 1996. Beginning in 1996, the
Company revised its practice
<PAGE>
of accounting for freight to standardize its practice worldwide. The result
increases both net sales and cost of products sold, with no effect on operating
earnings. The year-over-year increase, excluding the Acquisition, for the total
U.S. operations was approximately 6%, and for total non-U.S. operations was
approximately 29% in U.S. dollars and 32% in local currencies.
Net sales recorded by the Water Management Group global business unit,
exclusive of the approximate impact of the Misan and Dearborn acquisitions,
increased 7% over the prior year. In the U.S., this group turned in its best
year ever, increasing sales over 1995 in the middle single-digit percentage
range, with increased sales in all key customer industries. Outside the U.S.,
the Water Management Group recorded a middle teens percentage improvement over
last year's sales with the Asia-Pacific and Latin American regions recording the
largest increases.
The combined process chemical global business units, exclusive of
acquisitions, increased net sales by approximately 13%, with the U.S. reporting
a percentage increase in the upper single-digit range and non-U.S. units rising
over 20%. All global process chemical units reported increased sales. The Paper
Process Group increased its sales of Novus Polymers(TM) by 43% and has
experienced a successful new product introduction of its low toxicity Slime-Trol
RX-10R(R) biocide. The Hydrocarbon Process Group posted record sales for the
year, primarily due to new technology developments and rapid capacity expansion
in the petroleum refining industry outside North America, while U.S. capacity
reductions stabilized during the year. The Metals Process Group, the smallest of
the process chemical groups, achieved record sales and its third consecutive
year of double-digit percentage growth.
The Company's gross profit margin decreased from 63.6% of net sales in
1995 to 60.5% in 1996. This deterioration in the gross profit margin was
primarily due to changes in product mix (mostly those related to recent
acquisitions), standardization of the method of accounting for freight revenue
and increases in raw material and delivery costs, without comparable increases
in selling prices. Sales included in the 1996 Statement of Operations that are
attributable to the Misan and Dearborn acquisitions presently generate gross
profit margins at a rate lower than the Company's historical margin.
Selling, research and administrative expenses, as a percent of net
sales, decreased from 46.9% in 1995 to the current year's level of 45.5%. During
the second quarter of 1996, in preparation for the integration of Dearborn, the
Company revised the vesting policy for certain employee benefits to align Betz
and Dearborn policies, resulting in a reduction of operating expenses. Without
this, 1996 selling, research and administrative expenses would have been 46.0%
of net sales. The remainder of the decline was primarily due to savings achieved
from the Company's 1995 and 1996 restructuring actions, as well as ongoing cost
controls.
To continue to achieve reductions in operating costs and to integrate
the operations of the former Betz Laboratories, Inc. ("Betz") and Dearborn, the
Company has incurred or expects to incur incremental and non-recurring expenses
that are
<PAGE>
reported as Integration/Restructuring operating expenses. Integration expenses
are incremental and non-recurring costs necessary to integrate the two
businesses. Integration expenses in 1996 amounted to $20.4 million and are
associated with the activities of integration teams responsible for merging the
two companies for the benefit of future operations and include items such as
consulting and legal fees, integration incentive bonuses, training, travel and
Betz employee relocation expenses. These costs are reported as incurred and are
expected to continue into 1997, but are expected to be less than the 1996
expenses.
A $13.1 million pretax provision for restructuring is also included in
this caption for expected exit costs associated with the decisions to close Betz
facilities and the severance of Betz employees. The Company has also recorded a
$26.0 million pretax restructuring provision for the closure of Dearborn
facilities and severance costs for Dearborn employees located throughout the
world. The Dearborn restructuring provision increases the purchase price of the
Acquisition and, as such, is not included in 1996 results of operations.
These restructuring actions, which are principally cash obligations,
are expected to be complete during 1997 and include personnel reductions, office
consolidations and asset dispositions, including the shutdown of blending plants
in Winsford, United Kingdom; Fort Worth, Texas; Fort Saskatchewan, Canada; and
Heidelberg, Germany, and the shutdown of administrative and research facilities
in Lake Zurich, Illinois; Kanata, Canada; and Hoboken, Belgium, along with
approximately 15 satellite laboratories and 58 sales offices located throughout
the world. The combined provision includes $26.4 million for employee
termination benefits covering approximately 540 technical, production,
administrative and support employees worldwide. The remainder of the provision
is primarily related to facility closures and relocation of Dearborn employees.
The actions, when combined with other purchasing and production synergies, are
expected to yield in excess of $50 million in annual savings, which are expected
to be fully realized by 1998. No significant components of these provisions
would have been recognized in the absence of these actions.
The $15.6 million provision for restructuring recorded in 1995 was for
a series of actions to reduce operating costs. The provision included $7.8
million for the writedown associated with the closure of two blending plants and
other asset dispositions. The $7.8 million remaining provision was primarily for
employee termination benefits covering approximately 150 technical, production,
administrative and support employees located primarily in the U.S. As a result
of the completion of these restructuring actions, $3.5 million of the 1995
provision was reversed in 1996. The lower than anticipated costs resulted from
fewer terminations and higher attrition than planned, along with lower than
planned losses on the closure of the Compton, California plant. The completion
of the 1995 plan resulted in revised estimated annualized savings of
approximately $8 million, which will be fully realized in 1997.
Investment and other income declined $3.0 million from 1995 primarily
due to foreign exchange losses, principally in Venezuela. In addition, the
Acquisition financing caused the significant increase in interest expense during
1996.
<PAGE>
The effective income tax rate decreased from 38.8% in 1995 to 35.5% in
1996, reflecting the benefits from tax planning initiatives.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- 1995 vs. 1994
The Company's 1995 results of operations affirmed our belief in the
strategic decision to globalize to capture a larger share of non-U.S. markets.
Non-U.S. sales increased 22% from $170.4 million in 1994 to 1995's level of
$207.4 million. Sales in the U.S. increased 1% from $537.9 million in 1994 to
$545.0 million in 1995. Export sales from the U.S. are included with non-U.S.
sales in the preceding and succeeding discussion and analysis.
In 1995, net sales increased 6% from 1994 (approximately comprised of a
4% volume-mix gain and a 1% increase from both selling prices and from the
effects of foreign currency fluctuations). Net earnings decreased 7% from the
1994 level. During 1995, the Company recorded a pretax restructuring charge in
the amount of $15.6 million. Without this restructuring charge, 1995 net
earnings would have increased 6% over the 1994 level.
Sales in Europe, Canada, Asia-Pacific and Latin America were 16% higher
in local currencies. The 1995 U.S./non-U.S. sales relationship was 72%/28%,
respectively, compared to 76%/24% in 1994.
Sales reported by the Company's European subsidiaries were 18% higher
in U.S. dollars and 9% higher in local currencies. Sales of paper process
treatment programs in Europe were up strongly over 1994, while water treatment
programs and refinery process treatment programs recorded solid gains.
To continue its expansion in the European markets, the Company, on
November 7, 1995, acquired the Misan Group (Misan), an industrial water, paper
process and fuel oil treatment company with headquarters in Naples, Italy and
subsidiaries in Spain and Portugal. The Misan acquisition did not have a
material impact on the Company's 1995 results of operations, since it was
acquired on November 7, 1995, and the fiscal year ended on November 30, 1995.
The Canadian operation reported a local currency 1995 sales increase of
11%. The operation posted strong increases in all of the Company's core product
lines.
The Company's Asia-Pacific and Latin American subsidiaries also
experienced impressive sales growth for all product lines and were 42% higher
than 1994 in U.S. dollars and 38% higher in local currencies. Sales in the
Asia-Pacific area benefited from the acquisition of Taiwan Peitz Company, Ltd.
on May 1, 1995. The sales increase, exclusive of this acquisition, would have
been approximately 20% in local currencies.
<PAGE>
Taiwan Peitz Company, Ltd. was a water, paper process and refinery
process treatment business which had been a licensee of the Company's products
since 1974. The Taiwan Peitz acquisition provides the Company with additional
opportunities for growth in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly in the paper
and refinery process treatment businesses. The impact on the Company's 1995
results of operations was not material.
U.S. net sales for 1995, excluding the 1994 divestiture of Betz Energy
Chemicals, Inc., increased 2% from $533.8 million to $545.0 million.
Sales of water and wastewater treatment programs by the Water
Management Group, the largest marketing unit, were flat when compared to 1994,
primarily due to the ongoing weakness in the hydrocarbon processing industry.
Sales of specialty process chemical treatment programs in the U.S. rose
5% from the 1994 level of $182.8 million to $192.4 million in 1995. The Paper
Process Group reported a similar increase. Combined sales of specialty refinery
process treatment programs by Hydrocarbon Process Group and specialty process
chemicals to the metals industry by the Metals Process Group increased 6% over
1994.
The Company's gross profit margin decreased from 64.3% of net sales in
1994 to 63.6% in 1995, primarily due to higher raw material costs and a less
favorable product mix, without comparable increases in selling prices.
Selling, research and administrative expenses increased from $338.3
million in 1994 to $353.2 million in 1995, but decreased as a percent of net
sales to 46.9% from 1994's 47.8%. Reductions in administrative expenses were the
principal cause of this decline, which mainly resulted from restructuring
actions associated with the 1993 restructuring plan and continued cost controls.
Selling and research expenses, as a percent of sales, remained constant.
The effective income tax rate decreased from 39.5% in 1994 to 38.8% in
1995, reflecting the tax benefits from tax planning initiatives.
LIQUIDITY AND SOURCES OF CAPITAL
Prior to the consummation of the Acquisition on June 28, 1996, the
Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement (the "Revolver") with a
syndicate of banks. The Revolver provides for a five-year unsecured revolving
credit facility in the amount of $750 million that reduces to $550 million after
two years. The commitments made under the Revolver expire in July 2001. The
Revolver requires the Company, among other things, to maintain certain financial
ratios and meet certain net worth and indebtedness tests.
The Acquisition and the Revolver have a significant impact on the
Company's liquidity and sources of capital. The Company has taken or plans to
take actions necessary to manage its liquidity and capital resources in order to
comply with the
<PAGE>
provisions of the Revolver, to optimize its capital structure and to service the
dividend and debt requirements associated with its Employee Stock Ownership
Plan, while meeting operating cash requirements. The Company anticipates that
present cash and cash equivalents, cash provided from 1997 operating activities
and the $99 million of borrowings available under the Revolver will be
sufficient to fund its 1997 operating, capital expenditure, dividend and debt
cash requirements.
The Acquisition and related financing also increased the Company's
exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to foreign currency movements. The
Company plans to execute or has executed a number of instruments to reduce this
risk, including foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate swaps.
Since the Revolver bears interest at short-term variable rates, during
the second quarter of 1996, the Company executed a series of interest rate swaps
of variable to fixed rates, with staggered maturities, at a maximum notional
amount of $400 million for any future period. Also during 1996, the Company
hedged a portion of its exposure to foreign currency fluctuations through the
use of foreign currency forward contracts. These forward contracts were
primarily accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Gains or losses, which in the
aggregate are not material, are included with investment and other income on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company's accounts receivable and inventory balances, exclusive of
acquisitions, have increased in each year for the past three years to support
the increases in sales, especially in the non-U.S. business.
The restructuring liabilities are financed with available operating
cash flows and external financing resources. The Company expended $11.4 million
in 1996 to meet restructuring obligations.
Net cash used in investing activities, excluding the purchase of
Dearborn, decreased by $30.3 million in 1996 as compared to 1995. The Company
used approximately $32.5 million for the acquisition of Misan and Taiwan Peitz
during 1995. This amount is included with the purchases of businesses and
long-term investments on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. To partially
fund these acquisitions in 1995, the Company borrowed $17 million in short-term
notes payable which were repaid in 1996.
Capital expenditures for the year 1996 were $64.9 million, which
approximately equals 1995 expenditures. Major projects in 1996 included
expenditures for the installation of SAP financial systems and the expansion of
the Company's production facility in Beaumont, Texas to increase the
manufacturing capacity for the Novus(R) polymer line. The Company anticipates
that capital expenditures for 1997 will be $100 million to $110 million.
During 1996, the Company suspended its program of common share
purchases. Shares previously repurchased under this program will be used in
connection with stock plans and for other corporate purposes. In 1996, the
Company reissued 481,701
<PAGE>
treasury shares under its stock plans providing approximately $14.8 million in
cash proceeds.
The Company is a "Potentially Responsible Party" to ten waste disposal
sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986.
Adequate provision has been made in the financial statements for the Company's
portion of the anticipated remediation costs of these sites. While it is not
possible to precisely predict future costs in these matters, the Company does
not believe that any further assessments for these sites would have a materially
adverse impact upon its financial position.
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
The Company attempts to counter the impact of rising costs through
timely adjustments of product pricing whenever possible. The Company believes
that its use of the LIFO cost method and higher depreciation charges associated
with its newer, more costly and improved facilities mitigates the impact of
inflation on its reported earnings.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Pursuant to the "Safe Harbor" provisions under the Private Securities
Litigation Act of 1995, certain forward-looking statements made in this annual
report concerning such matters as sales, income, profitability, cost savings and
restructuring and integration progress are subject to a number of risks that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. For
example, timeliness could be longer than expected, there may be unforeseen
execution difficulties, or market, economic, or competitive conditions could
alter expected results.
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
BetzDearborn Inc.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31
----------------------------------------------------------
(In millions, except per share amounts) 1996 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES .................................................. $ 1,037.0 $ 752.5 $ 708.3
Operating Costs and Expenses:
Cost of products sold ................................... 409.3 273.7 252.5
Selling, research and administration .................... 472.0 353.2 338.3
Integration/restructuring ............................... 30.0 15.6 --
---------- -------- --------
911.3 642.5 590.8
---------- -------- --------
OPERATING EARNINGS ......................................... 125.7 110.0 117.5
Other Income (Expense):
Investment and other income ............................. (0.3) 2.7 3.6
Interest ................................................ (25.7) (1.1) (0.2)
---------- -------- --------
(26.0) 1.6 3.4
---------- -------- --------
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES ............................... 99.7 111.6 120.9
Income Taxes ............................................... 35.4 43.3 47.7
---------- -------- --------
NET EARNINGS ............................................... $ 64.3 $ 68.3 $ 73.2
========== ======== ========
Net Earnings per Common Share:
Primary ................................................. $ 2.10 $ 2.27 $ 2.43
========== ======== ========
Fully diluted ........................................... $ 2.00 $ 2.16 $ 2.30
========== ======== ========
Average Number of Common Shares:
(in thousands)
Primary ................................................. 28,105 27,889 28,108
========== ======== ========
Fully diluted ........................................... 30,927 30,651 30,885
========== ======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
BetzDearborn Inc.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31
---------------------------------
(In millions, except share amounts) 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 38.2 $ 13.9
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances:
1996 - $7.6; 1995 - $2.9 243.2 146.4
Inventories:
Finished products and goods purchased for resale 54.5 25.7
Raw materials 42.2 25.6
---------- --------
96.7 51.3
Income taxes 31.1 13.0
Prepaid expenses and other 29.5 27.6
---------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 438.7 252.2
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT --- at cost
Land 38.9 27.8
Buildings 221.9 190.3
Machinery and equipment 531.0 439.8
Construction in progress
(estimated cost to complete - $29.5) 11.9 12.5
---------- --------
803.7 670.4
Less allowance for depreciation (374.7) (336.6)
---------- --------
429.0 333.8
OTHER ASSETS
Investments and other 16.6 13.0
Goodwill - net of accumulated amortization:
1996 - $7.1; 1995 - $1.3 449.9 29.3
Other intangibles - net of accumulated amortization:
1996 - $4.3; 1995 - $2.2 84.1 2.2
---------- --------
550.6 44.5
---------- --------
$ 1,418.3 $ 630.5
========== ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
December 31
---------------------
1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade accounts payable $ 68.9 $ 39.2
Payroll and related taxes 47.8 26.7
Notes payable 0.8 18.5
Accrued restructuring costs 30.9 7.5
Other accrued liabilities 67.5 28.6
Income taxes -- 13.2
Dividends payable 10.6 10.2
Current portion of long-term debt 1.0 1.0
-------- -------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 227.5 144.9
LONG-TERM DEBT -- less portion classified as current 744.5 95.5
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Income taxes 12.4 20.5
Employee benefit plans 44.3 19.4
Other 4.1 7.2
-------- -------
60.8 47.1
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred shares, $.10 par value: authorized
1,000,000 shares;
issued 1996 -- 481,780 shares; 1995 --
487,903 shares 96.4 97.6
Guarantee of related ESOP debt (90.0) (91.4)
Common shares, $.10 par value: authorized --
90,000,000 shares;
issued 1996 -- 33,637,359 shares; 1995 --
33,643,981 shares 3.4 3.4
Capital in excess of par value of shares 93.8 82.6
Retained earnings 463.9 446.1
Cost of common shares in treasury: 1996 --
5,509,124 shares; 1995 -- 5,990,825 shares (188.0) (198.2)
Unearned compensation (4.2) (3.3)
Foreign currency translation adjustments 10.2 6.2
-------- -------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 385.5 343.0
-------- -------
$1,418.3 $ 630.5
======== =======
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
BetzDearborn Inc.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31
-----------------------------------------
(In millions) 1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings $ 64.3 $ 68.3 $ 73.2
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 61.0 48.5 44.8
Amortization 7.8 0.7 0.3
Compensation and employee benefit plans 12.6 10.5 8.6
Income taxes 7.4 (0.2) 1.6
Provision for restructuring 9.6 15.6 --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of business acquisitions:
Accounts receivable (24.2) (13.0) (18.8)
Inventories (2.7) (8.0) (2.3)
Prepaid expenses and other (1.0) (10.0) 0.3
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 7.5 (2.7) 6.6
--------- --------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 142.3 109.7 114.3
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment (64.9) (64.1) (55.0)
Proceeds from sales of long-term assets 3.5 2.0 9.1
Purchases of businesses and long-term investments (6.6) (34.6) (3.5)
Purchase of Dearborn, net of cash equivalents acquired (549.4) -- --
Other, net 1.0 (0.6) (1.7)
--------- --------- ---------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (616.4) (97.3) (51.1)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings under credit facilities 550.0 -- --
Net short-term borrowings (17.7) 17.4 --
Dividends paid (48.9) (48.4) (47.5)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, including treasury shares 14.8 1.0 3.1
Purchase of treasury shares -- (12.6) (20.0)
Principal payments on ESOP debt (1.0) (1.0) (0.5)
Retirement of ESOP preferred shares -- -- (0.5)
--------- --------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES 497.2 (43.6) (65.4)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 1.2 1.2 2.2
--------- --------- ---------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 24.3 (30.0) --
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 13.9 43.9 43.9
--------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 38.2 $ 13.9 $ 43.9
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
BetzDearborn Inc.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Capital in
Number of Shares Excess of
-------------------------------- Common Par Value
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) Common Treasury Stock of Stock
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1994 33,654,715 5,527,310 $ 3.4 $ 78.7
Net earnings
Dividends on preferred stock ($16.00 per share)
Tax benefit on preferred stock dividend
Dividends on common stock ($1.43 per share)
Reacquired common stock 400,000
Impact of stock issued under employee stock plans,
net of tax of $2.0 million (5,188) (142,411) 3.1
Currency translation adjustments
---------- --------- ------ ------
Balance at December 31, 1994 33,649,527 5,784,899 3.4 81.8
Net earnings
Dividends on preferred stock ($16.00 per share)
Tax benefit on preferred stock dividend
Dividends on common stock ($1.47 per share)
Reacquired common stock 300,000
Impact of stock issued under employee stock plans,
net of tax of $.3 million (5,546) (94,074) 0.8
Currency translation adjustments
---------- --------- ------ ------
Balance at December 31, 1995 33,643,981 5,990,825 3.4 82.6
Net earnings
Dividends on preferred stock ($16.00 per share)
Tax benefit on preferred stock dividend
Dividends on common stock ($1.49 per share)
Impact of stock issued under employee stock plans,
net of tax of $2.1 million (6,622) (481,701) 11.2
Currency translation adjustments
---------- --------- ------- -------
Balance at December 31, 1996 33,637,359 5,509,124 $ 3.4 $ 93.8
========== ========= ======= =======
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign
Unearned Currency
Retained Treasury Compen- Translation
Earnings Stock sation Adjustments
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1994 $ 394.7 $(170.4) $ (7.8) $ (4.3)
Net earnings 73.2
Dividends on preferred stock ($16.00 per share) (7.9)
Tax benefit on preferred stock dividend 3.3
Dividends on common stock ($1.43 per share) (39.8)
Reacquired common stock (20.0)
Impact of stock issued under employee stock plans,
net of tax of $2.0 million 2.9 2.3
Currency translation adjustments 7.0
------- ------- ------- -------
Balance at December 31, 1994 423.5 (187.5) (5.5) 2.7
Net earnings 68.3
Dividends on preferred stock ($16.00 per share) (7.8)
Tax benefit on preferred stock dividend 2.9
Dividends on common stock ($1.47 per share) (40.7)
Reacquired common stock (12.6)
Impact of stock issued under employee stock plans,
net of tax of $.3 million 1.9 2.2
Currency translation adjustments (0.1) 3.5
------- ------- ------- -------
Balance at December 31, 1995 446.1 (198.2) (3.3) 6.2
Net earnings 64.3
Dividends on preferred stock ($16.00 per share) (7.7)
Tax benefit on preferred stock dividend 2.7
Dividends on common stock ($1.49 per share) (41.5)
Impact of stock issued under employee stock plans,
net of tax of $2.1 million 10.2 (0.9)
Currency translation adjustments 4.0
------- ------- ------- -------
Balance at December 31, 1996 $ 463.9 $(188.0) $ (4.2) $ 10.2
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BetzDearborn Inc.
1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business - The Company is engaged in the engineered specialty chemical
treatment of water and industrial process systems operating in a wide variety of
industrial and commercial applications with particular emphasis on the chemical,
petroleum refining, paper, food processing, automotive, steel and power
industries. The Company develops, produces and markets a wide range of specialty
chemical products for use in boilers, cooling systems, heat exchangers, paper
and petroleum process streams and both influent and effluent systems. The
Company monitors changing water, process and plant operating conditions so as to
prescribe the appropriate treatment programs to solve problems such as
corrosion, scale, deposit formation and a variety of process problems.
Operations are conducted primarily in the United States, Canada and Europe, and
also in Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
Concentration of Credit Risk - Financial instruments which potentially
subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
accounts receivable and interest rate swap agreements. Concentrations of credit
risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of
customers comprising the Company's customer base and their dispersion across
many different industries and geographies. The Company generally does not
require collateral or other security to support customer receivables. The
counterparties to the interest rate swaps consist of a number of major
international financial institutions. The Company continually monitors the
credit ratings of its counterparties, and has limited the amount of agreements
with any one party. The Company believes these procedures minimize the risk of
credit losses in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. See note 2 regarding the preliminary nature of Dearborn purchase
accounting.
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany items and transactions are eliminated from the consolidated
statements. The Company follows the practice of using a November 30 fiscal year
for all non-U.S. subsidiaries, excluding Canada, in order to expedite the
year-end closing.
Revenue Recognition - Generally, the Company recognizes revenue upon
shipment and passage of title without right of return. For consignment sales,
revenue is recognized when material is used.
<PAGE>
Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The
carrying value of these investments approximates their fair value at December
31, 1996.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.
Cost of approximately 44 percent of the inventory is determined by the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method, the balance by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
If the FIFO method of inventory accounting had been used for all inventory,
amounts would have been approximately $10.9 million and $11.2 million higher
than reported at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively.
Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment is
recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. In March 1995, the
FASB issued Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," which requires impairment
losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of
impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount. The Company adopted
Statement 121 in the first quarter of 1996 and the effect of adoption was not
material.
Investments - Marketable equity securities and cash surrender value of
officers' life insurance policies are recorded at fair value. All other
investments are generally carried at cost, which does not exceed estimated fair
value.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - Goodwill amortization is
computed by the straight-line method generally over 40 years. Other intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis ranging between 3 and 40 years in
accordance with the nature of the asset. Goodwill and other intangible assets
relate primarily to the Acquisition (see note 2). For all such assets, the
Company evaluates their carrying values for impairment by considering the
operating performance and expected future undiscounted cash flows of the
underlying businesses.
Foreign Currency - The Company is exposed to the effect of foreign
exchange rate fluctuations on the U.S. dollar value of the income of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries (see note 4). Occasionally, the Company enters into
foreign currency forward contracts to minimize the effect of fluctuating foreign
currencies on its cash flow and current unremitted income from certain non-U.S.
subsidiaries. The forward contracts generally are marked to market and resulting
adjustments are recorded directly in income. These adjustments had no material
impact on the results of operations for 1996, 1995 and 1994. There were no open
contracts at the end of 1996. Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. operations
where the functional currency is the local currency are translated into U.S.
dollars at the fiscal year-end exchange rate. The related translation
adjustments are recorded as cumulative translation adjustments, a separate
component of shareholders' equity. Revenues and expenses are translated using
average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Foreign currency transaction
gains and losses, as well as translation adjustments for assets and liabilities
<PAGE>
of non-U.S. operations where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar, are
included in the results of operations. Such adjustments were not material in
1996, 1995 and 1994.
Research and Development - Research and development costs ($35.7
million in 1996, $32.2 million in 1995 and $29.8 million in 1994) are charged to
expense as incurred.
Per Share Amounts - Primary earnings per Common Share is computed by
dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of stock options during
the periods presented. In computing primary earnings per Common Share, preferred
stock dividends, net of related income tax benefits, reduce income available to
common shareholders. In computing fully diluted earnings per Common Share,
conversion of the Series A ESOP Convertible Preferred Shares is assumed.
Stock-Based Compensation - The Company follows Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock-based compensation (see
note 8).
<PAGE>
2: ACQUISITIONS
Dearborn - On June 28, 1996, pursuant to the Grace Dearborn Worldwide
Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement"), the Company acquired (the
"Acquisition") the Dearborn business unit ("Dearborn") of W.R. Grace & Co. -
Conn. ("Grace") for $632 million, subject to certain adjustments. Dearborn is a
global supplier of industrial water and process treatment chemicals with 1995
annual net revenues of $399.1 million. The Acquisition was financed by a $750
million Credit Agreement among the Company and a syndicate of banks (see note
5).
The Acquisition is accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and is included in the consolidated statement of operations since the
date of acquisition. The Company adopted a November 30 fiscal year-end for
non-U.S. Dearborn units except Canada to align the fiscal year-end with the
remainder of the Company's operations. Consequently, Dearborn units except
Canada and the U.S. reported five months of results of operations in 1996. The
Company intends to completely integrate the two companies, which will make it
impractical in the future to report the results of Dearborn separately from the
remainder of the Company's results of operations.
The Company has recorded goodwill of $420.4 million relating to this
acquisition, determined as follows (in millions):
Cash paid to Grace $ 539.4
Note payable to Grace (see note 5) 100.0
Additional adjustments due to Grace 2.9
--------
642.3
Adjustments:
Restructuring provision (see note 11) 26.0
Transition services cancellation fees 10.0
Professional fees and transaction costs 12.7
Tax effects, net (27.4)
--------
663.6
Less: Fair value of net tangible assets acquired 160.6
Fair value of identifiable intangible
assets acquired 82.6
--------
Estimated goodwill recorded as of acquisition date $ 420.4
========
The $26.0 million restructuring provision (see note 11) is primarily
for closure of Dearborn facilities and severance costs for Dearborn employees.
The Company may incur up to $10.0 million, in accordance with the Agreement,
relating to the cancellation of transition services currently provided to the
Company, principally in South America and Europe. Professional fees and
transaction costs amounting to $12.7 million are primarily for acquisition
consulting, legal and accounting fees. The estimated tax effects, which reduce
<PAGE>
the adjusted purchase price, are comprised of the estimated tax effects
resulting from the purchase price adjustments and for the net deferred tax
effects of differences in the allocation of purchase price for financial
reporting and tax purposes.
In accordance with the purchase method, the adjusted purchase price was
allocated to the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, with the excess
recorded as goodwill. The $82.6 million allocated to identifiable intangibles is
the independently appraised value of the trademarks, trade names and patents of
Dearborn. Patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over 13 to 15 years and
unlimited-life trademarks and trade names are amortized over 40 years. The
estimated goodwill of $420.4 million resulting from the Acquisition is amortized
on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Amortization expense of $6.7 million is
included in the 1996 results of operations.
Although the purchase price allocation is substantially complete, the
estimated goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date is subject to further
adjustment as a result of a number of factors such as: the final working capital
adjustment; further potential closures of Dearborn facilities; final
determination of the adequacy of reserves sufficient to meet all liabilities
assumed under the Agreement; further adjustments to the estimated tax effects;
and potential adjustments to the fair value of assets acquired. The Company
expects to finalize the purchase accounting in the second quarter of 1997.
Had the Acquisition occurred as of January 1, 1995, unaudited pro forma
results would have been (in millions, except per share amounts):
Year Ended December 31
----------------------
Pro forma unaudited 1996 1995
---- ----
Net Sales $1,261.6 $1,151.6
Net Earnings 50.0 25.5
Net Earnings per Common Share:
Primary 1.59 .74
Fully Diluted 1.53 --
The pro forma results reflect adjustments primarily for the increased
amortization and interest expense attributable to the Acquisition and the
related tax effects. Potential cost savings, however, from combining Dearborn
with the Company's operations are not reflected. Therefore, the pro forma
results are not indicative of the results that would have occurred had the
Acquisition actually been consummated on January 1, 1995, and are not intended
to be a projection of future results or trends. The historical financial results
of operations of Dearborn reflect the "carve out" of Dearborn from Grace.
Certain selling, research and administrative expenses of Grace have been
allocated to Dearborn on various bases, which, in the opinion of Grace's
management, are reasonable. However, such expenses are not necessarily
<PAGE>
indicative of, and it is not practicable for management to estimate, the nature
and level of expenses which might have been incurred if Dearborn had been
operating as a separate independent company.
Misan Group and Taiwan Peitz - In 1995, the Company acquired two
businesses to continue its expansion in non-U.S. markets. On May 1, 1995, the
Company acquired Taiwan Peitz Company, Ltd., a water, paper process and refinery
process treatment business, which had been a licensee of the Company's products
since 1974. On November 7, 1995, the Company acquired the Misan Group, an
industrial water, paper process and fuel oil treatment company with headquarters
in Naples, Italy and subsidiaries in Spain and Portugal.
The Taiwan Peitz and Misan acquisitions have also been accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting. The combined purchase price for these
acquisitions was $43.4 million consisting of $32.5 million in cash paid in 1995,
$7.3 million paid in 1996 and $3.6 million payable in 1997. The excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately
$25 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years. No
significant adjustments to the goodwill recorded on these acquisitions were made
in 1996.
The operating results of these acquired businesses have been included
in the consolidated statements of operations since the dates of acquisition. The
pro forma consolidated results of operations, as if the acquisitions had taken
place at the beginning of fiscal 1994, would not have been materially different
from the reported amounts for fiscal 1994 and 1995.
<PAGE>
3: INCOME TAXES
The components of earnings before income taxes are (in millions):
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
U.S. $ 85.1 $75.6 $ 90.6
Non-U.S. 14.6 36.0 30.3
------ ------ ------
$ 99.7 $111.6 $120.9
====== ====== ======
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in millions):
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Current:
Federal $ 22.4 $ 31.8 $ 34.8
State 4.3 4.4 4.3
Foreign 5.1 10.4 10.2
------ ------ ------
Total Current 31.8 46.6 49.3
Deferred:
Federal 2.9 (4.7) (1.9)
State 0.5 (1.0) (0.2)
Foreign 0.2 2.4 0.5
------ ------ ------
Total Deferred 3.6 (3.3) (1.6)
------ ------ ------
Total Taxes $ 35.4 $ 43.3 $ 47.7
====== ====== ======
A reconciliation of the effective income tax rate with the statutory
federal income tax rate is as follows:
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Federal tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State and local taxes, net of
federal income taxes 3.1 2.0 2.3
Foreign tax credits (4.8) -- --
Other items 2.2 1.8 2.2
------ ------ ------
Effective income tax rate 35.5% 38.8% 39.5%
====== ====== ======
<PAGE>
Deferred income taxes reflect the estimated future tax effects of
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as
of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
1996 1995
---- ----
Deferred Tax Assets:
Stock and benefit plans $ 15.3 $ 10.6
Nondeductible costs and expenses 19.3 11.0
Other -- 3.9
------ ------
Total Deferred Tax Assets 34.6 25.5
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Tax over book depreciation, net (21.7) (32.5)
Other (2.6) (0.5)
------ ------
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities (24.3) (33.0)
------ ------
Net Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities) $ 10.3 $ (7.5)
====== ======
In 1996 and 1995, the income taxes classified as current assets include
deferred tax assets of $22.7 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The
remaining deferred tax balance of $12.4 million and $20.5 million is included in
long-term liabilities - income taxes on the balance sheet.
The Company made income tax payments of $45.8 million, $46.0 million
and $39.3 million during the years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The Company has not provided United States income taxes on $70.9
million of unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries because management views
such earnings as being indefinitely invested.
<PAGE>
4: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates principally in one industry segment which includes
the development, manufacture and sale of specialty chemical products.
The Company's areas of operation outside of the United States and
Europe principally include Canada, Latin America and Asia-Pacific. No single
non-U.S. country in which the Company produces or markets its products has been
significant to consolidated operations. No single customer accounts for more
than 10 percent of the Company's revenues.
Information about the Company's operations in different geographic
locations is (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
United Other
1996 States Europe Foreign Consolidated
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $641.1 $ 218.9 $177.0 $1,037.0
Operating earnings 90.4 12.2 23.1 125.7
Identifiable assets 702.0 412.8 303.5 1,418.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995
Net sales $555.9 $ 111.6 $ 85.0 $ 752.5
Operating earnings 78.6 15.2 16.2 110.0
Identifiable assets 395.7 142.7 92.1 630.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994
Net sales $551.5 $ 94.3 $ 62.5 $ 708.3
Operating earnings 94.8 13.3 9.4 117.5
Identifiable assets 395.0 102.9 57.6 555.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the local currency is the functional currency of
non-U.S. operations representing 46% of consolidated identifiable assets. For
operations in highly inflationary economies, the U.S. dollar is the functional
currency. Identifiable assets of such operations were 5% of consolidated
identifiable assets at December 31, 1996.
United States identifiable assets include $2.6 million, $0.8 million
and $27.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and other investments at December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. These assets are available for general
corporate purposes.
Direct export sales of $11.2 million, $10.8 million and $13.6 million
for the years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, are included in United States
net sales.
<PAGE>
5: LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
----------------------- -------------------
Rate(1) Amount Rate(1) Amount
------- ------ ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revolving credit agreement 5.98% $548.0 --
Promissory note to Grace 5.87 100.0 --
ESOP debt 8.56 95.5 8.08% $96.5
Other indebtedness 6.36 2.0 --
------ -----
Total debt 745.5 96.5
Less current maturities 1.0 1.0
------ -----
Long-term debt $744.5 $95.5
====== =====
</TABLE>
(1) Weighted average interest rate at December 31.
Prior to the consummation of the Acquisition on June 28, 1996, the
Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement (the "Revolver") with a
syndicate of banks. The Revolver provides for a five-year unsecured revolving
credit facility in an amount of $750 million that reduces to $550 million after
two years. The commitments made under the Revolver expire in July 2001. The
Revolver requires the Company, among other things, to maintain certain financial
ratios and meet certain net worth and indebtedness tests. Approximately $99
million of the Revolver was unused at December 31, 1996.
Borrowings under the Revolver, at the Company's option, are at a
composite of three banks' base rates or at LIBOR, plus a margin. Margin pricing
is dependent on the Company's selected pricing option of either a specific
financial ratio test or the Company's public debt rating. The Company pays a
facility fee of .175% of the total commitment of funds provided by the banks.
Commitment fees to maintain the Revolver totaled $0.7 million during 1996 and
are included in interest expense.
<PAGE>
In addition to cash borrowings made to finance the above acquisition,
the Company used an additional $103 million of commitments under the Revolver to
obtain a Letter of Credit which secures a $100 million promissory note plus
interest payable to Grace. This note matured on January 2, 1997 and was
refinanced using proceeds from additional borrowings under the Revolver and
therefore is classified as long-term debt as of December 31, 1996.
In 1989 the Company arranged for and guaranteed a loan of $100 million
to the ESOP trust for the purchase of the Company's preferred stock (see note
7). The loan and guarantee, which mature on June 19, 2009, are recorded in the
Company's consolidated balance sheets as long-term debt and a reduction of
shareholders' equity. With respect to the ESOP debt, the Company is obligated,
among other things, to maintain certain financial ratios and meet certain net
worth and indebtedness tests. As a condition of the Trustee's approval of
changes in the financial covenants, the interest rate on the ESOP debt increased
from 8.08% to 8.56%.
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt, including the effect of
refinancing the promissory note to Grace as noted above, are as follows (in
millions): 1997 - $1.0; 1998 - $99.0; 1999 - $3.0; 2000 - $1.5; 2001 - $552.5;
and 2002 through 2009 - $88.5.
Interest Rate Swaps - During the second quarter of 1996, the Company
entered into interest rate swap agreements, with maturities ranging from 1.5 to
5.5 years, to effectively convert $400 million of the Company's variable-rate
long-term debt to fixed interest rate obligations, thereby reducing the
Company's risk to rising interest rates. Over the term of each swap agreement,
the Company exchanges interest payments with the swap counterparty without
exchanging the notional amount upon which the payments are based. The
differential to be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an adjustment
to interest expense related to the debt. The related amount payable to such
counterparties is included in accrued liabilities.
The Company has designated the series of swaps as hedges of future
interest rate exposure on its variable-rate debt outstanding. The series of
swaps will hedge no more than the aggregate amount of variable-rate debt
outstanding. The Company may also designate individual swaps included in this
series as both a hedge against interest rate exposure and a hedge of the fair
value of future fixed-rate term debt replacing outstanding variable-rate debt.
In the event future fixed-rate term debt is issued, the Company intends to
terminate the designated swaps and amortize the gain or loss on such termination
over the remainder of the hedged period. In the event fixed-rate debt is not
issued for the entire remaining hedged period, a portion of the termination gain
or loss will be included in net earnings.
Fair Value of Debt and Interest Rate Swaps - The fair value of the
Company's short-term notes payable, long-term debt and interest rate swaps, all
of which are held for purposes other than trading, at December 31 is summarized
below (in millions):
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------------------- -------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
-------- ----- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Notes payable $ 0.8 $ 0.8 $18.5 $ 18.5
Long-term debt 745.5 753.3 96.5 104.0
Interest rate swap payable 0.7 5.6 -- --
</TABLE>
The estimated fair values of these financial instruments are generally
based on quoted market prices or on current rates available to the Company for
financial instruments of similar remaining maturities and do not include
potential tax effects or possible expenses incurred in settling the transactions
to terminate the related agreements.
Interest Expense - Net ESOP expense (see note 7) is characterized as
interest expense in the accompanying financial statements. The effect of the
interest rate swap agreements referred to above was to increase interest expense
by $2.0 million in 1996. Cash payments for interest amounted to $17.8 million,
$1.6 million and $1.3 million for the years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Interest expense is capitalized on major construction projects. Interest expense
components for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Gross interest expense $26.1 $1.6 $1.3
Capitalized interest (0.4) (0.5) (1.1)
----- ---- ----
Interest expense $25.7 $1.1 $0.2
===== ==== ====
<PAGE>
6: LONG-TERM LEASES
Total rental expense for all leases amounted to $18.8 million, $14.9
million and $14.0 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The future
rental commitments, primarily for automobiles, as of December 31, 1996 for all
noncancelable long-term leases are (in millions): 1997 - $13.8; 1998 - $8.3;
1999 - $3.8; 2000 - $0.8; 2001 - $0.6; and $1.0 thereafter.
<PAGE>
7: EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP (ESOP) AND 401(k) PLAN
In 1989, the Company established an ESOP and a related trust as a
long-term benefit for substantially all of its U.S. employees. This plan
supplements the Company's employee retirement plan. Under this plan, the Company
sold 500,000 shares of a new Series A ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock to the
trust for $100 million. This series of preferred stock has one vote per share
with cumulative dividends at a rate of 8% and is stated at the aggregate
liquidation preference on the balance sheet. The Company arranged for and
guaranteed a loan of $100 million (see note 5) to the trust for the purchase of
the preferred stock. Proceeds of the loan were primarily used for the purchase
of common treasury stock to be used for future conversion and redemption of the
preferred stock, which is presently convertible into 2,702,588 shares of common
stock. The loan and guarantee are recorded in the Company's consolidated balance
sheets as long-term debt and a reduction in shareholders' equity.
Effective January 1, 1990, the Company's 401(k) program was integrated
into the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Employees may invest 2 to 15 percent of
eligible compensation. Company matches, equal to 25 percent of the first 4
percent of employees' investments, fully vest to employees upon the completion
of 5 years of service. The Company's matching contributions, which are included
in ESOP expense, are made in the form of the ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock.
The value of such matching contributions amounted to $1.5 million in 1996 and
$1.4 million in both 1995 and 1994.
After satisfying the 401(k) matching contributions, the remaining
shares of ESOP stock are allocated to each participant based on the ratio of the
participant's compensation to total compensation of all participants. During
1996, 6,123 shares of the Preferred Stock were converted to Common Shares by
plan participants and permanently retired. The number of shares allocated and
unallocated at December 31 are as follows:
1996 1995
---- ----
Allocated 121,911 109,512
Unallocated 359,869 378,391
------- -------
Total shares held by ESOP 481,780 487,903
======= =======
The Company is required to make quarterly contributions to the Plan
which enable the trust to service its indebtedness. Net ESOP cost for the
Company is comprised of the following elements (in millions):
<PAGE>
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
ESOP expense $ 9.3 $ 9.2 $ 9.2
Preferred dividends
(charged to retained earnings) (7.7) (7.8) (7.9)
----- ----- -----
ESOP expense charged to earnings $ 1.6 $ 1.4 $ 1.3
===== ===== =====
ESOP contributions $ 9.0 $ 8.8 $ 8.4
===== ===== =====
The ESOP expense is calculated using the 80-percent-of-shares-allocated
method. To the extent that this expense exceeds the ESOP's annual debt service
requirements, an adjustment is made to the shareholders' equity reduction to
reflect the cumulative effect of the excess charges.
<PAGE>
8: STOCK OPTION, STOCK INCENTIVE AND SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLANS
The Company follows Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," (APB 25) in accounting for its
employee stock options. Since each option's exercise price equals the fair
market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant, no compensation
expense is recognized. Pro forma disclosures as if compensation expense had been
recognized for options granted in 1996 and 1995, in compliance with FASB
Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," are included
below.
Option Plans - Options granted under the Company's Stock Option Plans
are at the fair value at the date of grant. The period during which these
options become exercisable ranges from date of grant to two years after date of
grant. Unexercised options expire ten years after date of grant. No individual
may receive an option if that individual owns (or would own if options were
exercised) stock possessing five percent of the voting power or value of all
classes of stock of the Company.
Option activity is summarized as follows:
Number of Average Weighted
Shares Price per Share
--------- ----------------
Outstanding at January 1, 1994 1,972,940
Granted 727,746
Canceled (25,490)
Exercised (110,927)
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 1994 2,564,269 $48.126
Granted 967,688 43.749
Canceled (40,998) 52.916
Forfeited (5,006) 44.875
Exercised (47,730) 21.606
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 1995 3,438,223 47.210
Granted 493,841 43.493
Canceled (44,715) 51.838
Forfeited (12,727) 44.450
Exercised (378,120) 39.501
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 1996 3,496,502 47.470
=========
Exercisable at December 31, 1996 2,922,488 48.236
=========
The exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 1996
ranged from $20.25 to $60.50. The weighted average remaining contractual life of
those options is 6.75 years. The options outstanding and exercisable at December
31, 1996 are segregated into groups based on ranges of exercise price below:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg.
Exercise Remaining
Shares Outstanding at 12/31/96: Range of Prices Price Life
--------------- -------- ---------
<C> <C> <C> <C>
162,281 $20.250 - $29.125 $22.870 1.24 yrs
178,192 33.500 - 39.250 38.256 7.70 yrs
2,025,727 40.500 - 49.625 45.123 7.83 yrs
1,130,302 50.250 - 60.500 56.661 5.47 yrs
---------
3,496,502 $20.250 - $60.500 $47.470 6.75 yrs
=========
Wtd. Avg.
Exercise
Shares Exercisable at 12/31/96: Range of Prices Price
--------------- --------
162,281 $20.250 - $29.125 $22.870
132,289 33.500 - 39.250 37.911
1,501,394 40.500 - 49.625 45.556
1,126,524 50.250 - 60.500 56.673
---------
2,922,488 $20.250 - $60.500 $48.236
=========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the Company had remaining an aggregate of
4,032,747 Common Shares reserved for issuance under its Stock Option Plans.
As required by Statement 123, pro forma information regarding net
income and earnings per share has been determined as if the Company had
accounted for its stock options under the fair value method. A weighted average
fair value of $9.63 for options granted in 1996 and $9.78 for those granted in
1995 was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 6.22%;
weighted average dividend yield of 3.4%; volatility factor of the expected
market price of the Company's common stock of .203; and a weighted average
expected life of the options of 6.75 years.
Option valuation models use highly subjective assumptions to determine
the fair value of traded options with no vesting or trading restrictions.
Because options granted under the Company's Stock Option Plans have vesting
requirements and cannot be traded, and because changes in the assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing
valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value
of its employee stock options.
For purposes of the pro forma disclosures required by Statement 123,
the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the
options' vesting period. Statement 123 requires only that the income effects of
options granted during 1995 and 1996 be included in the pro forma disclosures,
i.e., 1995 grants for the 1995 pro forma disclosures; 1995 and 1996 grants for
the 1996 pro forma disclosures. Since a portion of the Company's stock options
vest over one- and two-year periods, and additional options are granted each
year, the pro forma effect on net income reported below is not representative of
the effect of fair value stock option expense on future years' pro forma net
income. The Company's pro forma information follows (in millions, except for per
share information):
Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995
---- ----
Pro forma net income $60.5 $64.2
Pro forma earnings per share:
Primary 1.97 2.13
Fully diluted 1.88 2.03
Incentive Plan - The Employee Stock Incentive Plan provides that up to
2,500,000 shares of common stock may be granted to April 13, 2005, at the
discretion of the Board of Directors, to key employees and non-employee
Directors at no cost to the employees or Directors. The Company granted 72,407
shares and 20,658 shares during 1996 and 1995, respectively, at a weighted
average value of $43.58 in 1996 and $42.33 in 1995. Key employees receiving
grants are entitled to receive dividends, but assumption of full beneficial
ownership is contingent at the time of grant. In the event the employee does not
remain in continuous employment for the periods stipulated, the shares are
canceled and revert to the Company for reissuance under the Plan.
The aggregate fair market value of the shares granted under this Plan
is considered unearned compensation at the time of grant and compensation is
earned ratably over the stipulated period. Compensation cost included in net
income is $1.9 million in 1996 and $2.5 million in 1995.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had remaining an aggregate of 563,367
Common Shares available for issuance under its Employee Stock Incentive Plan.
Common Stock Shareholder Rights Plan - On September 8, 1988, the Board
of Directors declared a distribution of one Stock Purchase Right for each Common
Share outstanding. Each right will entitle the holder to buy from the Company a
unit consisting of one Common Share at an exercise price of $75 per unit. The
rights become exercisable ten days after a public announcement that a person or
group has acquired 20 percent or more of the Company's Common Shares or has
commenced a tender offer for 20 percent or more of the Common Shares. The rights
may be redeemed prior to becoming exercisable by action of the Board of
Directors at a redemption price of $.01 per right. If more than 20 percent of
the Company's Common Shares become held by a beneficial owner, other than
<PAGE>
pursuant to an offer deemed in the best interests of the shareholders by the
Company's independent directors, each right may be exercised for Common Shares,
or other property, of the Company having a value of twice the exercise price of
each right. If the Company is acquired by any person after the rights become
exercisable, each right will entitle its holder to receive common shares of the
acquiring company having a market value of twice the exercise price of each
right. The rights expire on September 19, 1998.
<PAGE>
9: EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS
The Company has defined benefit plans to provide pension benefits to
substantially all of its U.S. employees and for employees of several non-U.S.
operations. The benefits are primarily based on years of service and the
employee's final average compensation. The Company's funding policy is to
contribute an amount annually based upon actuarial and economic assumptions
designed to achieve adequate funding of projected benefit obligations. Plan
assets are principally invested in listed common stocks, bonds and common trust
funds.
Effective January 1, 1995, the Company refined the termination,
retirement and salary scale assumptions to better reflect actual experience. The
new salary scale assumption is graded by age with an underlying inflation
assumption. The underlying inflation assumption for the salary scale was changed
to 4% from 5% in 1994. The 1994 salary scale was not graded and assumed a
constant rate of increase over the employees' years of service. These changes
contributed to the reduction of the Company's 1995 net periodic pension expense.
Other primary assumptions used to develop the Company's net periodic
pension expense and the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Discount rate 7.5% 7.0% 8.5%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets 9.25% 9.25% 9.25%
Net periodic pension for the Company's defined benefit plans consists
of the following (in millions):
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Service cost $ 9.8 $ 6.8 $ 9.1
Interest cost 15.6 13.0 12.5
Return on plan assets (29.9) (33.3) (12.3)
Net amortization and deferral 14.8 20.6 .6
------ ------ -----
Net periodic pension expense $ 10.3 $ 7.1 $ 9.9
====== ====== =====
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the actuarial present value of benefit
obligations and funded status at December 31 for the Company's plans (in
millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Vested benefits $(189.1) $(154.0)
Nonvested benefits (12.1) (9.1)
-------- -------
Accumulated benefit obligation (201.2) (163.1)
Effect of projected future salary increases (42.4) (28.9)
------- --------
Projected benefit obligation (243.6) (192.0)
Plan assets at fair value 234.0 175.8
------- --------
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (9.6) (16.2)
Unrecognized net gain (28.3) (3.6)
Unrecognized prior service cost 6.4 7.0
Other (0.7) 0.8
------- --------
Net pension liability included in the balance sheet $ (32.2) $ (12.0)
======= =======
</TABLE>
The significant increases in 1996 expense and benefits reflect primarily
the impact of the Acquisition discussed in note 2.
<PAGE>
10: POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company pays limited medical and dental insurance premiums on
behalf of certain early retirees as well as providing a small life insurance
benefit for certain retirees. On June 28, 1996, the U.S. employees of Dearborn
became eligible for these benefits.
Other long-term liabilities at December 31, 1996 and 1995 include $7.8
million and $6.1 million, respectively, representing the actuarially determined
liability for these benefits. The actuarially determined expense was $1.5
million, $1.1 million and $1.3 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
<PAGE>
11: INTEGRATION/RESTRUCTURING
To achieve reductions in operating costs and to integrate the
operations of the former Betz Laboratories, Inc. (Betz) and the former Dearborn
business (Dearborn), the Company has incurred incremental and non-recurring
expenses that are reported as Integration/Restructuring operating expenses.
Integration expenses are incremental and non-recurring costs necessary
to integrate Dearborn and Betz. Integration expenses in 1996 amounted to $20.4
million and are associated with the activities of integration teams responsible
for merging the two companies for the benefit of future operations and include
items such as consulting and legal fees, integration bonuses, training, travel
and Betz employee relocation expenses. These costs are expensed as incurred and
will continue in 1997, but are expected to be less than 1996 expenses.
The provision for restructuring is for estimated exit costs associated
with the decisions to close Betz facilities and severance costs for Betz
employees. These costs are accrued when the decisions are announced and exit
costs can be reasonably estimated. A $9.6 million provision for restructuring,
net of the 1995 provision reversal noted below, was recorded in 1996 for the
closure of Betz facilities and the severance of Betz employees located
throughout the world. An additional $26.0 million restructuring provision for
the closure of Dearborn facilities and severance and relocation costs for
worldwide Dearborn employees was also recorded in 1996. The Dearborn provision
increases the purchase price of the Dearborn business in accordance with the
purchase method of accounting. These combined actions include personnel
reductions, office consolidations and asset dispositions, including the shutdown
of blending plants in Winsford, United Kingdom; Fort Worth, Texas; Fort
Saskatchewan, Canada; and Heidelberg, Germany, and the shutdown of
administrative and research facilities in Kanata, Canada; Lake Zurich, Illinois;
and Hoboken, Belgium along with satellite laboratories and sales offices located
throughout the world. The combined provision covers employee termination
benefits for approximately 540 technical, production, administrative and support
employees located throughout the world.
In connection with the Acquisition and restructuring decisions, at
December 31, 1996, approximately $12.2 million of assets are held for sale.
These assets, included in property, plant and equipment, are primarily
production facilities of both Betz and Dearborn. The Company plans to complete
the sale of such facilities in 1997.
The $15.6 million provision for restructuring recorded in 1995 was for
a series of actions to reduce operating costs. The provision included $7.8
million for the writedown associated with the closure of two blending plants and
other asset dispositions. The $7.8 million remaining provision was primarily for
employee termination benefits covering approximately 150 technical, production,
administrative
<PAGE>
and support employees located primarily in the U.S. As a result of the
completion of these restructuring actions, $3.5 million of the 1995
restructuring provision was reversed in 1996. The lower than anticipated cost
resulted from fewer than planned terminations and higher than planned attrition,
along with lower than estimated losses on the closure of the Compton, California
plant.
A reconciliation of activity with respect to the 1996 and 1995
restructuring accruals is as follows (in millions):
1996 1995
---- ----
Balance at beginning of year $ 7.5 $ 5.2
Provision:
Included in Goodwill (see Note 2) 26.0 --
Charged to Statement of Operations - net 9.6 15.6
Cash Payments (11.4) (5.5)
Non-cash - Fixed asset writedowns and
foreign exchange translation ( 0.8) (7.8)
------ ----
Balance at end of year $ 30.9 $ 7.5
====== =====
Although most major integration and restructuring decisions have been
made, there may be additional actions in 1997. The Company anticipates the
restructuring plans will be completed during 1997. Cash flows from operations
and available financing sources will be sufficient to implement the intended
actions.
<PAGE>
12: QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)
The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the years
ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 (in millions, except for per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 Quarter Ended
--------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
-------- ------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $ 199.5 $ 210.1 $ 304.2 $ 323.2
Gross Profit 122.6 129.3 183.8 192.0
Provision for Integration/
Restructuring -- .4 14.1 15.5
Earnings Before
Income Taxes 31.5 34.9 16.3 17.0
Net Earnings 19.7 22.3 10.9 11.4
Net Earnings Per
Common Share:
Primary .66 .75 .34 .35
Fully Diluted .62 .71 .33 .34
Fully Diluted (before inte-
gration/restructuring) .62 .71 .64 .68
Cash Dividends Declared
Per Common Share .37 .37 .375 .375
Common Share Market
Prices:
High Price 47-1/4 48 53-1/2 60-1/8
Low Price 40-1/8 41-3/4 43-1/8 50
1995 Quarter Ended
--------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
-------- ------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $ 177.9 $ 188.9 $ 195.8 $ 189.9
Gross Profit 114.9 120.3 124.5 119.1
Provision for Integration/
Restructuring -- -- 1.3 14.3
Earnings Before
Income Taxes 30.7 32.7 33.4 14.8
Net Earnings 18.7 20.0 20.5 9.1
Net Earnings Per
Common Share:
Primary .63 .67 .69 .28
Fully Diluted .59 .64 .65 .28
Fully Diluted (before inte-
gration/restructuring) .59 .64 .68 .56
Cash Dividends Declared
Per Common Share .36 .37 .37 .37
Common Share Market
Prices: 46-5/8 45-5/8 46-3/8 41-5/8
High Price 42-7/8 41-1/4 40-3/4 38-3/4
Low Price
</TABLE>
The common stock of the Company is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol BTL. The approximate number of record holders of
Common Shares as of February 7, 1997, was 3,549.
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS
BetzDearborn Inc.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share amounts) 1996 1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $1,037.0 $752.5 $708.3 $684.9
Operating Costs and Expenses:
Cost of products sold 409.3 273.7 252.5 237.5
Selling, research and administrative expenses 472.0 353.2 338.3 329.9
Provision for integration/restructuring 30.0 15.6 -- 16.2
-------- ------ ------ ------
911.3 642.5 590.8 583.6
-------- ------ ------ ------
Operating Earnings 125.7 110.0 117.5 101.3
Other Income (Expense):
Investment and other income (0.3) 2.7 3.6 2.9
Interest expense (25.7) (1.1) (0.2) (0.1)
-------- ------ ------ ------
(26.0) 1.6 3.4 2.8
-------- ------ ------ ------
Earnings Before Income Taxes 99.7 111.6 120.9 104.1
Income Taxes 35.4 43.3 47.7 40.7
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes, net -- -- -- 2.1
-------- ------ ------ ------
Net Earnings $64.3 $68.3 $73.2 $65.5
======== ====== ====== ======
Earnings per Common Share:
Primary $2.10 $2.27 $2.43 $2.12
Fully diluted $2.00 $2.16 $2.30 $2.02
Fully diluted (before integration/restructuring) $2.65 $2.47 $2.30 $2.33
Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share $1.49 $1.47 $1.43 $1.39
Average Number of Common Shares (in thousands):
Primary 28,105 27,889 28,108 28,576
Fully diluted 30,927 30,651 30,885 31,331
KEY STATISTICS
As Reported in the Company's Annual Reports
Total assets $1,418.3 $630.5 $555.5 $521.1
Non-U.S. sales $407.1 $207.4 $170.4 $153.6
Long-term debt $745.5 $96.5 $97.5 $98.0
Return on average common equity 16.5% 19.4% 22.3% 20.6%
Return on sales 6.2% 9.1% 10.3% 9.3%
Sales growth 37.8% 6.2% 3.4% (3.1%)
Primary earnings per Common Share growth (7.5%) (6.6%) 14.6% (21.8%)
Common dividends paid per share growth 1.7% 2.8% 2.9% 6.2%
(In millions, except per share amounts) 1992 1991 1990
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $707.0 $665.6 $596.8
Operating Costs and Expenses:
Cost of products sold 241.4 233.3 214.4
Selling, research and administrative expenses 334.3 313.3 278.3
Provision for integration/restructuring -- -- --
-------- ------ ------
575.7 546.6 492.7
-------- ------ ------
Operating Earnings 131.3 119.0 104.1
Other Income (Expense):
Investment and other income 3.2 5.0 4.9
Interest expense (0.3) (0.2) (1.6)
-------- ------ ------
2.9 4.8 3.3
-------- ------ ------
Earnings Before Income Taxes 134.2 123.8 107.4
Income Taxes 52.2 48.3 41.9
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes, net -- -- --
-------- ------ ------
Net Earnings $82.0 $75.5 $65.5
======== ====== ======
Earnings per Common Share:
Primary $2.71 $2.47 $2.12
Fully diluted $2.58 $2.36 $2.02
Fully diluted (before integration/restructuring) $2.58 $2.36 $2.02
Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share $1.33 $1.20 $1.05
Average Number of Common Shares (in thousands):
Primary 28,474 28,547 28,512
Fully diluted 31,221 31,306 31,287
KEY STATISTICS
As Reported in the Company's Annual Reports
Total assets $510.6 $475.8 $427.4
Non-U.S. sales $160.5 $142.0 $121.8
Long-term debt $98.5 $99.0 $99.5
Return on average common equity 28.0% 29.7% 30.1%
Return on sales 11.6% 11.3% 11.0%
Sales growth 6.2% 11.5% 15.5%
Primary earnings per Common Share growth 9.7% 16.5% 20.5%
Common dividends paid per share growth 12.1% 14.9% 13.5%
(In millions, except per share amounts) 1989 1988 1987 1986
---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $516.7 $447.6 $385.9 $344.4
Operating Costs and Expenses:
Cost of products sold 191.8 166.9 140.8 126.8
Selling, research and administrative expenses 237.4 204.7 177.5 154.3
Provision for integration/restructuring -- -- -- --
-------- ------ ------ ------
429.2 371.6 318.3 281.1
-------- ------ ------ ------
Operating Earnings 87.5 76.0 67.6 63.3
Other Income (Expense):
Investment and other income 5.0 2.9 3.0 3.5
Interest expense (1.5) (0.1) (0.1) --
-------- ------ ------ ------
3.5 2.8 2.9 3.5
-------- ------ ------ ------
Earnings Before Income Taxes 91.0 78.8 70.5 66.8
Income Taxes 35.1 30.4 29.9 31.3
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes, net -- -- -- --
-------- ------ ------ ------
Net Earnings $55.9 $48.4 $40.6 $35.5
======== ====== ====== ======
Earnings per Common Share:
Primary $1.76 $1.57 $1.29 $1.12
Fully diluted $1.72 -- -- --
Fully diluted (before integration/restructuring) $1.72 -- -- --
Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share $0.92 $0.82 $0.75 $0.69
Average Number of Common Shares (in thousands):
Primary 30,224 30,747 31,403 31,814
Fully diluted 31,696 -- -- --
KEY STATISTICS
As Reported in the Company's Annual Reports
Total assets $369.2 $318.5 $286.9 $269.6
Non-U.S. sales $98.3 $85.5 $69.0 $56.3
Long-term debt $100.0 -- -- --
Return on average common equity 25.8% 22.2% 19.9% 17.8%
Return on sales 10.8% 10.8% 10.5% 10.3%
Sales growth 15.4% 16.0% 12.0% 7.8%
Primary earnings per Common Share growth 12.1% 21.7% 15.2% (4.3%)
Common dividends paid per share growth 11.3% 9.6% 7.4% 7.9%
</TABLE>
Notes: On June 28, 1996 the Company acquired Dearborn -- see note 2.
1993 includes the cumulative effect of accounting changes relating to
income taxes, retiree health benefits and pensions amounting to primary
and fully diluted earnings per share of $.07.
<PAGE>
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS' INFORMATION
BetzDearborn Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIRECTORS
William R. Cook
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer,
BetzDearborn Inc.
John W. Boyer, Jr.
Retired Chief Executive Officer,
Philadelphia Suburban Corporation
Patrick F. Brennan
Retired President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Operating Officer,
Consolidated Papers, Inc.
Carolyn S. Burger
C. B. Associates, Inc.
George A. Butler
Retired President,
CoreStates Financial Corp.
Alan R. Hirsig
President and Chief Executive Officer,
ARCO Chemical Company
John F. McCaughan
President,
BetzDearborn Foundation
John A. Miller
Chairman, Investment Committee,
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company
John R. Quarles, Jr., Esq.
Partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
John A. H. Shober
Retired President and
Chief Executive Officer,
Penn Virginia Corporation
Geoffrey Stengel, Jr.
President, Envirite Corporation
Robert L. Yohe
Retired Vice Chairman,
Olin Corporation
<PAGE>
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
William R. Cook, Chairman
John F. McCaughan
AUDIT COMMITTEE
George A. Butler, Chairman
John W. Boyer, Jr.
Patrick F. Brennan
John A. Miller
John R. Quarles, Jr.
John A. H. Shober
OFFICERS
William R. Cook
Robert B. Allahand
June B. Barry
Edward G. Birnstiel
William C. Brafford
Dwight P. Davis
Richard A. Heberle
John L. Holland
George L. James, III
Ronald A. Kutsche
Richard L. Morris
J. Patrick Prader
Ian Priestnell
Larry V. Rankin
PRESIDENTS OF GLOBAL BUSINESS UNITS
John L. Holland
BetzDearborn Water Management Group
Ronald A. Kutsche
BetzDearborn Paper Process Group
John F. Elliott
BetzDearborn Hydrocarbon Process Group
William A. Micsky
BetzDearborn Metals Process Group
<PAGE>
REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT
American Stock Transfer and Trust Co.
40 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
10-K REPORT AND BUSINESS PROFILE
For further information, shareholders may obtain the Company's most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, by calling (215) 953-5550 or writing to the Investor Relations
Department at the headquarters address. Also available upon request is a
Business Profile containing additional background and data for use by
professional investors.
INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT
W. T. Drury, Jr.
Assistant Vice President --
Investor Relations
(215) 953-2355
ANNUAL MEETING
The next Annual Meeting of BetzDearborn Inc. will take place on April 10, 1997
at 11 a.m. Daylight Savings Time in the Corporate Training Center at Corporate
Headquarters, 4636 Somerton Road, Trevose, Pennsylvania.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net earnings $64.3 $68.3 $73.2
Effect of preferred stock dividends, net of taxes (5.3) (4.9) (4.9)
--------- --------- ----------
$59.0 $63.4 $68.3
========= ========= ==========
Average Common Shares outstanding 27.8 27.7 27.9
Common stock equivalents 0.3 0.2 0.2
--------- --------- ----------
Average number of Common Shares - primary 28.1 27.9 28.1
========= ========= ==========
Primary earnings per Common Share $2.10 $2.27 $2.43
========= ========= ==========
FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net earnings $64.3 $68.3 $73.2
Effect of ESOP charge to operations assuming
conversion of Series A ESOP Convertible
Preferred Shares, net of taxes (2.6) (2.1) (2.2)
--------- --------- ----------
$61.7 $66.2 $71.0
========= ========= ==========
Average Common Shares outstanding 27.8 27.7 27.9
Common stock equivalents 0.4 0.2 0.2
Assumed conversion of Series A ESOP Convertible
Preferred Shares 2.7 2.8 2.8
--------- --------- ----------
Average number of Common Shares - fully diluted 30.9 30.7 30.9
========= ========= ==========
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share $2.00 $2.16 $2.30
========= ========= ==========
</TABLE>
Common stock equivalents reflect the assumed exercise of dilutive employees'
stock options using the treasury stock method.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BETZDEARBORN INC.
By: /s/ William R. Cook Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
William R. Cook,
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ George L. James, III Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
George L. James, III
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ John F. McCaughan Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
John F. McCaughan,
Director
By: /s/ John W. Boyer, Jr. Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
John W. Boyer, Jr.,
Director
By: /s/ Patrick F. Brennan Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
Patrick F. Brennan,
Director
By: /s/ Carolyn S. Burger Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
Carolyn S. Burger,
Director
By: /s/ George A. Butler Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
George A. Butler,
Director
By: /s/ William R. Cook Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
William R. Cook,
Director
By: /s/ Alan R. Hirsig Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
Alan R. Hirsig,
Director
By: /s/ John A. Miller Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
John A. Miller,
Director
By: /s/ John Quarles Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
John Quarles,
Director
By: /s/ John A. H. Shober Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
John A. H. Shober,
Director
By: /s/ Geoffrey Stengel, Jr. Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
Geoffrey Stengel, Jr.,
Director
By: /s/ Robert L. Yohe Date: March 27, 1997
-----------------------------------
Robert L. Yohe,
Director
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
BetzDearborn Hydrocarbon Process Group Inc., a Texas corporation.
BetzDearborn Paper Process Group Inc., a Florida corporation.
BetzDearborn Argentina S.A., an Argentinean corporation.
BetzDearborn Australia Pty Limited, an Australian corporation.
BetzDearborn Ges. mbH, an Austrian corporation.
BetzDearborn N.V., a Belgian corporation.
Dearborn International Ltda., a Brazilian corporation.
BetzDearborn Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation.
BetzDearborn de Chile Ltda., a Chilean corporation.
BetzDearborn Colombia S.A., a Colombian corporation.
BetzDearborn Denmark A/S, a Danish corporation.
BetzDearborn de Ecuador S.A., an Ecuadorian corporation.
BetzDearborn OY, a Finnish corporation.
BetzDearborn S.A., a French corporation.
BetzDearborn GmbH, a German corporation.
BLI-DB HK, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
BetzDearborn India Private Limited, an Indian corporation.
PT BetzDearborn Persada, an Indonesian corporation.
BetzDearborn Ireland Limited, an Irish corporation.
BetzDearborn S.p.A., an Italian corporation.
BetzDearborn Korea Ltd., a Korean corporation.
Betz (Malaysia) Sdn. BHD, a Malaysian corporation.
BetzDearborn de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation.
BetzDearborn B.V., a Dutch corporation.
<PAGE>
BetzDearborn Norge A/S, a Norwegian corporation.
BetzDearborn del Peru S.A., a Peruvian corporation.
BetzDearborn Portuguesa, Lda., a Portuguese corporation.
BetzDearborn Pte. Ltd., a Singapore corporation.
BetzDearborn South Africa (Pty) Ltd., a South Africa corporation.
BetzDearborn Iberica S.A., a Spanish corporation.
BetzDearborn AB, a Swedish corporation.
BetzDearborn Taiwan Limited, a Taiwanese corporation.
BetzDearborn (Thailand) Co. Ltd., a Thailand corporation.
BetzDearborn de Uruguay S.A., a Uruguayan corporation.
BetzDearborn Limited, a United Kingdom corporation.
BetzDearborn Venezuela C.A., a Venezuelan corporation.
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of BetzDearborn Inc. of our report dated February 11, 1997, included in the 1996
Annual Report to Shareholders of BetzDearborn Inc.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of BetzDearborn Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this schedule based
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-60557) of BetzDearborn Inc. of our report dated February 11, 1997, with
respect to the financial statements incorporated herein by reference and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in the 1996 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
BetzDearborn Inc.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 38
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 251
<ALLOWANCES> 8
<INVENTORY> 97
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 439
<PP&E> 804
<DEPRECIATION> 375
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 227
<BONDS> 744
6
0
<COMMON> 3
<OTHER-SE> 376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,418
<SALES> 1,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,037
<CGS> 409
<TOTAL-COSTS> 409
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 26
<INCOME-PRETAX> 100
<INCOME-TAX> 35
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 64
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 64
<EPS-PRIMARY> 2.10
<EPS-DILUTED> 2.00
</TABLE>
