BOISE CASCADE CORP
PRRN14A, 1997-03-10
PAPER MILLS
Previous: BOEING CO, 10-K, 1997-03-10
Next: FRANKLIN ASSET ALLOCATION FUND, N-30D, 1997-03-10



                    SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

   Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
             Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )


Filed by the Registrant   [   ]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ X ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ X ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement

[   ]  Definitive Proxy Statement

[   ]  Definitive Additional Materials

[   ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S)
240.14a-12

[   ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

                       BOISE CASCADE
- -----------------------------------------------------------------

    (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)  United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 99

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[ X ]  No fee required.

[   ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-
6(i)(4) and 0-11.

     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:

     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:

     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount
on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):

     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     (5)  Total fee paid:

[   ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[   ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule
and the date of its filing.

     (1)  Amount previously paid:

     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     (3)  Filing Party:

     (4)  Date Filed


<PAGE>

UFCW 99       
2401 N. Central Ave., 2nd fl. 
Phoenix AZ  85004
(602) 572-2149

Sent to shareholders:    March 14    , 1997 

SHAREHOLDER SOLICITATION FOR PROPOSAL FOR ANNUAL
ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTORS (BOARD DECLASSIFICATION) 
at BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION
Annual Stockholders Meeting 
April 18, 1997, 10:00 a.m.
Boise Center on the Grove
850 W. Front Street
Boise, ID 

Dear Fellow Boise Cascade Shareholder:

     We write to alert you to an upcoming vote on our shareholder
proposal recommending the company declassify its board of
directors (that is, have all directors elected annually). 

     Boise Cascade has a "classified" or "staggered" board,
meaning each year shareholders only get to vote on one-third of
the seats on the board. 

     Recently several companies have moved to declassify
their board, such as Mead Paper and Union Pacific.  In
1996,         proposals against staggered boards passed at
Alumax, General Instrument, Liz Claiborne, Rowan and Stride Rite.

They received a majority of shares voted at 4 other companies.
   Shareholder support for proposals recommending
declassification increased to an average 42.4% (59
companies).    
 
     Many companies have annual election of all directors,
including Hewlett-Packard and U.S. Bancorp.  Wayne Huizenga, co-
founder of Blockbuster and Waste Management (WMX), has the
following views on staggered boards, according to        
Business Week reporter Gail DeGeorge.         

     He didn't believe in staggered boards, golden parachutes,
     poison pills, or any of the other anti-takeover remedies
     adopted by U.S. corporations. "The best thing for
     shareholders to if someone wants to come in and make a run
     at the company, let them make a run. Run the price up,
     that's what my job was * * * All these chairmen that want to
     put this in place and that in place, they all want to save
     their jobs. I don't care about my job."FN1 

FN1:     The Making of a Blockbuster (1996) at 211.      Neither
Huizenga nor DeGeorge are participants in this solicitation. They
have not been consulted regarding this quotation nor consented
thereto.

<PAGE>
In our view, a director is more likely to be responsive to
shareholder interests if he or she must answer annually to the
shareholders rather than every third year. 

     Under a classified board, even if a majority of shareholders
wanted to replace the whole board, that would likely take 3 years
to fully accomplish.  Our proposal is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that shareholders recommend the Company have all
     directors stand for election annually (in other words,
     declassify its board of directors). 

       
                                                                 
VOTING PROCEDURE AND VOTING RIGHTS

     MANAGEMENT DID NOT INCLUDE THIS PROPOSAL IN THE PROXY CARD
IT ALREADY SENT YOU. IF YOU EXECUTE 
    
   THAT     CARD, IT PURPORTS
TO GIVE MANAGEMENT DISCRETION TO VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. 

     If you are a holder of record, you can use the enclosed card
to vote on the proposal.  If instead you own through a bank,
broker or other nominee, you need to check with them on how to
direct how they will vote your stock on this matter. It is
possible management may resolicit you with a card allowing you to
direct its vote on the proposal. You may also vote by attending
the annual meeting. 

       You may revoke a proxy vote any time before the tally by
(1) executing a later proxy card; (2) appearing at the meeting to
vote, or (3) delivering the proxyholder or the Company's
secretary written notice of revocation prior to the date of the
meeting.  We will keep the content of all cards we receive
confidential from everyone except our staff, except that at the
meeting our cards must be presented to the company's tabulator in
order to be counted.  The proposal is advisory in nature and
cannot be implemented without Board approval.  Each share of
common stock will be entitled to one vote on each matter coming
before the meeting.  To be approved, the proposal would have to
receive more affirmative votes than negative for shares
represented at the meeting.  The record date is 2/25/97.  

<PAGE>
SOLICITATION

       The sole participants in this solicitation are United Food
& Commercial Workers Local 99 (which owns 42 shares of company
common stock), and members of its staff (not owners themselves). 
UFCW 99 will bear the costs of this solicitation, expected to be
$2,000.  We represent employees in the Arizona retail food
industry, and are in negotiations over a successor contract for
one Albertson's store. We are organizing other Albertson's stores
over management opposition in what we feel are improper forms.FN2
        Albertson's director John Carley has been a director of
BC's Office Products subsidiary.  Albertson's director John Fery
is BC's retired Chairman.  Albertson's does business with BC and
BC Office Products.     After we made this proposal, we learned
Albertson's CEO Gary Michael was nominated for the first time
this year for election as a BC director. We are not soliciting
against his election.     We do not ask for your support in the
labor dispute and do not believe it relevant to how you should
vote on a corporate governance proposal. Even if these labor
problems are resolved, we will present your proxy cards at the
shareholders meeting.  Last year we pursued similar shareholder
proposals at other companies with board connections to
Albertson's, and         this year, we will present governance
proposals at Boeing, Heritage Media, TIS Mortgage, Pier 1 and
Questar, which have an Albertson's director on their boards. 

FN2: Over 1400 Albertson's employees around the nation have
   signed     declarations    claiming     they worked
"off-the-clock" (without compensation):         two class action
suits are pending against Albertson's on this issue. Since 1/93,
the National Labor Relations Board has issued approximately 47
complaints against Albertsons. Management has used the workplace
to campaign against us while refusing us access, even to break
areas.  It refuses to use expeditious union recognition
procedures (used by it in other locations), instead insisting on
Board procedures:            we do not claim this is illegal, but
in our view it costs      more time and money for all concerned. 

<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS/EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION/ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER MATTERS FOR
SHAREHOLDER VOTE 

         We incorporate by reference the information on these
subjects in management's proxy statement. If you return a proxy
card to us but do not direct us how to vote on these matters, we
will vote for all nominees and
    
       proposals. If any matter
comes before the meeting not listed in our card (which we do not
anticipate), we will not vote your stock thereon.  

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 1998 MEETING

    Shareholders owning over $1,000 in stock for over one
year have the right to have a proposal included in management's
proxy statement.  The deadline to submit such proposals to the
Company is Nov. 5, 1997.

PLEASE VOTE FOR THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR ANNUAL ELECTION OF
ALL DIRECTORS (BOARD DECLASSIFICATION).

                                     Sincerely,
                                     William McDonough
                                     President UFCW 99

<PAGE>

USE THIS CARD ONLY IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD (I.E.,
       DO NOT HOLD THROUGH BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE). 

     If you are not    the record owner    ,        contact the
record owner to direct it    on     how to vote your shares. 

PROXY 
SOLICITED BY UFCW 99        for
BOISE CASCADE CORP. 
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
April 18, 1997

     The undersigned shareholder hereby appoints William
McDonough proxy with full power of substitution to vote for the
undersigned at the Boise Cascade Corp. annual meeting, and at
any adjournments thereof, on the matters set forth in the Proxy
Statements. The undersigned directs this proxy be voted in
accordance with the instructions below, and grants no
discretionary authority.

     WE RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR MOVING TO ANNUAL ELECTION OF ALL
DIRECTORS (DECLASSIFY THE BOARD). 

(1) Proposal recommending annual election of all directors (board
declassification) 

     FOR [   ]   AGAINST [   ]     ABSTAIN [   ]

(2) Election of directors

     Nominees: Phillip Carroll, George Harad, Donald Macdonald,
Gary Michael, Jane Shaw, Edson Spencer

    FOR all nominees: [  ]  WITHHOLD from all nominees [  ]

FOR all nominees except: ____________________________

   (3) Shareholder proposal to change state of incorporation from
Delaware to Idaho.

     FOR [   ]   AGAINST [   ]     ABSTAIN [   ]    

(4) Appoint Arthur Andersen LLP as accountants for 1997

     FOR [   ]   AGAINST [   ]     ABSTAIN [   ]

SIGNATURE ________________________________   DATE ___________

PRINT NAME/TITLE__________________________   DATE ___________

ADDRESS __________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
____________     ___________      ___________
# OF SHARES      PHONE No.        FAX NO.

PERSONS SIGNING IN REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY SHOULD
INDICATE AS SUCH. IF SHARES ARE HELD JOINTLY, BOTH OWNERS SHOULD
SIGN. 








© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission