<PAGE> 1
[MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION LOGO] "Quality Promised, Quality Delivered"
Dear Shareholder:
In last year's Annual Report, we stated that fiscal 1996 would "be the
pivotal year that determines the future of the Austro Mold Group in our
Company". During the first half of the fiscal year, we were unable to stem the
losses at Austro Mold. Accordingly, in the third quarter, the Board of Directors
authorized management to seek a buyer for Austro Mold. Although we marketed
Austro Mold locally utilizing a consultant, we ultimately received the best
offer from outside of the Rochester area, and were able to close the sale prior
to the end of the fourth quarter.
The significant write-off which we incurred as a result of the Austro Mold
sale, together with Austro Mold's operating losses, resulted in an unprofitable
year for the Company. However, the losses were all in the first three quarters.
In the fourth quarter, during which Austro Mold was sold, the Company returned
to profitability, reporting $204,000 in net earnings.
Our domestic core business, magnetic assemblies, performed well during
fiscal 1996, although its profitability was impacted by the addition of
lower-margin remanufacturing business. Our challenge remains to expand our core
business beyond its dependence upon a single major customer. In this connection,
our new European subsidiary, Magnetic Technologies Europe Limited (MTE), has
already played a leading role. In fiscal 1996, our largest customer accounted
for less than half of MTE's business and, after fiscal year end, MTE announced a
major contract with a new European customer.
Organizationally, the Board of Directors was further strengthened with the
addition of Catherine D'Amico. As Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President
and Treasurer of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc., Ms. D'Amico brings additional
financial experience to the Board. Outside Directors now constitute not only a
majority of the Board, but also serve as the sole members of both the Audit
Committee and Compensation Committee.
Looking ahead, now that we have divested ourselves of Austro Mold and the
Company has returned to profitability, we can focus our energies on expanding
our core business and achieving growth based upon our reputation for developing
and manufacturing high quality components and systems in the office automation
and imaging industries.
Sincerely,
/s/ Gordon H. McNeil
- -----------------------------
Gordon H. McNeil
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE> 2
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1996
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
Commission File No. 0-4277
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Incorporated in Delaware I.R.S. Employer No. 16-0961159
770 Linden Avenue, Rochester, New York 14625
Telephone No. (716) 385-8711
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class Names of exchanges on which registered
------------------- --------------------------------------
None None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock (Par Value $.15 per share)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past twelve months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No[ ]
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
The registrant's revenues for its most recent fiscal year ended July 31, 1996
were $25,227,635.
The aggregate market value of the issuer's voting common stock held by
non-affiliates as of September 16, 1996 was approximately $8,366,924
(2,308,117 shares x $3.625 average of bid and asked prices).
2,786,584 shares of the issuer's common stock were outstanding as of
September 16, 1996.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
The issuer's proxy statement for the December 17, 1996 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders is incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 9, 10, 11 and 12
of this report.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one) Yes [ ] No [ X ]
1
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
(a) Business Development
Magnetic Technologies Corporation (the Company) is engaged in contract
manufacturing. Incorporated in 1969, the Company's Magnetic Assembly Group has
historically concentrated on designing and manufacturing magnetic, electronic
and mechanical subassemblies of copiers and printers for the electronic office
equipment manufacturing industry.
During 1993, the Company undertook two unrelated steps in an effort to
decrease its reliance on a single customer (Xerox Corporation and its English
subsidiary, which historically accounted for approximately 90% of the Company's
business). It licensed to an English corporation the magnetic assembly European
business which it had been performing for Xerox, and it acquired the Austro Mold
Group, which designs and builds plastic molds and manufactures custom injection
molded parts and assemblies. The combined actions reduced the Company's
percentage of Xerox business to 74% in its fiscal year ended July 31, 1995
(fiscal 1995) and 80% in its fiscal year ended July 31, 1996 (fiscal 1996);
however, both actions have been nullified by subsequent events, and the
Company's percentage of business with Xerox is expected to increase somewhat in
the current fiscal year.
In the second half of fiscal 1995, the Company reacquired its European
business by purchasing Magnetic Technologies Europe Limited ("MTE"), located in
Rochester, Kent, England, from its parent corporation at a purchase price
considerably below the licensing fee originally received by the Company for that
business. Although MTE has diversified, and is expected to further diversify its
customer base, 48% of MTE's fiscal 1996 sales of $2,030,000 were to a Xerox
subsidiary.
The Austro Mold acquisition did not prove beneficial to the Company. After
the acquisition, Austro Mold suffered both a sales decline and cost overruns,
incurring net losses of approximately $2,000,000 in the two years prior to
fiscal 1996, and the Magnetic Assembly Group's profits were insufficient to
offset Austro Mold's losses. In fiscal 1995, the Company replaced the Vice
President in charge of the Austro Mold Group with an experienced plastics
industry executive and took corrective cost-control actions. In spite of these
measures, the Austro Mold Group losses continued. In its Form 10-KSB for fiscal
1995, the Company stated that fiscal 1996 would be the "defining, or pivotal,
year in which the future of Austro Mold will be determined". Accordingly, when
Austro Mold's losses continued through the first half of fiscal 1996, management
recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, its sale.
On July 15, 1996, the Company sold the Austro Mold Group assets to an
unrelated third party. The purchaser acquired Austro Mold's fixed assets and the
bulk of its inventory, while the Company retained Austro Mold's accounts
receivable, accounts payable and a lesser portion of its inventory. The
purchaser also subleased Austro Mold's premises in Rochester, New York, from the
Company through December 17, 1997, the duration of the original lease term. The
Company agreed to purchase its requirements for plastic molded parts from the
purchaser for a period of five years after the closing, provided that the
purchaser remains competitive in terms of quality, cost and delivery. The
purchaser paid $916,000 in cash for Austro Mold's fixed assets at the closing,
assumed $168,000 of equipment leases and tendered a $343,000 five-year note for
the inventory which it acquired. The note is personally guaranteed by the vice
president and majority shareholder of the newly formed Austro Mold corporation
and is secured by the conveyed assets (subordinate to the purchaser's bank
debt). The Company recorded an estimated $1,800,000 loss in the third quarter of
fiscal 1996 in connection with the Board of Director's approval of the sale of
Austro Mold's assets.
The Company incurred a net loss of $2,017,000 for fiscal 1996, including
the final loss on the sale of the Austro Mold Group assets of $1,774,000, on
revenues of $25,228,000; however, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996, the
Company returned to profitability with a net profit of $204,000 on sales of
$5,820,000.
2
<PAGE> 4
(b) Business of Issuer
The Company's contract manufacturing business consists of the development,
manufacture and assembly of products to the OEM market in various stages, from
engineering and design, to prototypes, to production runs. The products
currently consist of (a) precision magnetic, electronic and mechanical devices
and (b) the remanufacturing of components and subassemblies for reuse by office
equipment manufacturers.
The Magnetic Assembly Group, including the Company's remanufacturing
operations, operates out of the Company's main facility in Rochester, New York,
marketing its products primarily to United States original equipment
manufacturers by direct sales. The Company's wholly-owned European subsidiary,
MTE, operates out of a facility in Rochester, Kent, England, marketing magnetic
assemblies to European manufacturers by direct sales. The Company promotes
business by providing engineering, design and prototype services to assist
manufacturers in the development of new products. These services often result in
the Company obtaining production orders after the related products evolve from
the prototype stage.
The Company's magnetic assembly business competition includes Hitachi in
Japan, GenCorp in the United States and several smaller service companies;
however, more competition is provided by the in-house capabilities of the
Company's customers. Quality and price are both important factors in the
marketplace. In the area of quality, the Magnetic Assembly Group historically
set the high standards which some Japanese competitors have been able to meet in
recent years. In the area of pricing, the Company has faced continuous pressure
not only from competitors but also from its principal customer to lower prices.
Management believes that the Company's proprietary "reaction in mold" (RIM)
injection molding process utilized in the manufacture of magnetic brush cores
provides it with somewhat of a competitive advantage, and the Company utilizes
this RIM process both domestically and at MTE. Because MTE is located in
England, management believes it may have a competitive advantage over Japanese
companies in obtaining European business from new customers. In September 1996,
the Company announced that MTE had signed a multi-year contract to produce
magnetic assembly components for Xeikon N.V., a Belgian company.
Magnets, the Company's key raw material for magnetic assemblies, are
available through six suppliers, no one of which dominates the industry. Two of
the suppliers (Stackpole Corporation and GenCorp) are located in the United
States, while the other four are Japanese firms. All of the vendors deliver
acceptable quality materials, and in recent years, supplies of magnets have been
readily obtainable.
Since Xerox Corporation continues to be a major customer of the Company
[see Item 1(a) of this report], the loss of Xerox as a customer would have a
material adverse impact on the Company and would create a substantial burden to
replace the lost business. The Company continues to work with Xerox to find
methods of reducing their mutual reliance upon each other.
The Company has no material patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises,
concessions, royalty agreements or labor contracts. However, the Company's
proprietary RIM process is important to its business. No material portion of the
Company's products or services is dependent upon governmental approvals, nor do
existing or probable governmental regulations materially affect the Company's
business. Compliance with environmental statutes and regulations has not had a
material effect on the Company's capital expenditures, earnings or competitive
position in recent fiscal years.
The Company's expenditures in company-sponsored research and development
activities have been nominal ($1,000 in fiscal 1996 and $6,000 in fiscal
1995). Considering the integration of its engineering and manufacturing
operations, the Company cannot readily identify the amount of customer-funded
research and development activities.
The Company had 75 full-time employees at September 16, 1996.
3
<PAGE> 5
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company operates out of two leased facilities described below.
The Company's corporate headquarters, core engineering staff and domestic
magnetic assembly manufacturing operations, including remanufacturing
operations, are located in a 70,000 square foot building at 770 Linden Avenue,
Rochester, New York. The facility is in good condition and management believes
that it has sufficient capacity to house up to $35,000,000 to $40,000,000 of
sales volume per year. Under the terms of its lease expiring October 31, 2000,
the Company pays rental of $30,468 per month. The landlord of the building is
Linden Properties, a partnership in which one partner is the Chairman of the
Company's Board of Directors and holder of more than 5% of the Company's common
stock and the other partner is also an owner of more than 5% of the Company's
common stock.
MTE operates out of an 8,350 square foot facility in Rochester, Kent,
England as a tenant at will terminable by either party upon 30 days notice. The
location is adequate to house up to approximately $4,000,000 of annual sales
volume. Since the MTE operation is presently relatively small, it could easily
be moved to a more permanent location in England if sales volume increases made
such a move necessary or desirable.
The Company also has a residual obligation for the lease of its former
Austro Mold Group facility in Rochester, New York, through December 1997. The
Company's rental for three buildings at that location aggregating 40,000 square
feet is $13,650 per month. The Company has subleased that property to the
purchaser of the Austro Mold assets for $11,500 per month. The total aggregate
difference between the rental payments and rental receipts for that facility,
or $36,550, was accrued and included in the total loss on the sale of the
Austro Mold Group assets in fiscal 1996. The lease for Austro Mold's former
Florida facility in Clearwater expired on December 17, 1995. The rental expense
for that facility was accrued in fiscal 1995.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
4
<PAGE> 6
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(a) Market Information
The Company's common stock is traded on the over-the-counter market and is
reported under the symbol "MTCC" on the National Association of Securities
Dealers Automated Quotation System (NASDAQ/NNM: MTCC). The high and low bid
prices of the Company's common stock for each quarter during the past two fiscal
years were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL 1996 FISCAL 1995
----------------- -----------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
----- ----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter (August - October) $5.28 $4.00 $5.50 $4.00
Second Quarter (November - January) $5.00 $4.00 $5.38 $4.25
Third Quarter (February - April) $4.44 $3.38 $5.38 $4.25
Fourth Quarter (May - July) $4.00 $3.25 $5.88 $4.75
</TABLE>
Note: The above quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.
(b) Holders
On September 16, 1996, the Company had 4,652 stockholders of record, plus
an unknown number having their shares registered in "street name" or in the name
of a nominee.
(c) Dividends
The Company paid no cash dividends on its common stock during the past two
fiscal years and is unlikely to do so in the near future. Future profits are
more likely to be utilized to improve the Company's working capital base. Under
its current loan arrangements, the Company cannot pay cash dividends without
approval of its bank.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In fiscal 1996, the Company reported consolidated sales of $25,228,000, a
$3,018,000, or 14%, increase over the prior year. The Company's Magnetic
Assembly Group reported sales of $19,485,000, an increase of $2,516,000, or 15%,
over fiscal 1995 sales levels. MTE contributed sales totaling $2,030,000 for the
full fiscal year 1996, compared with sales of $558,000 in the last five months
of fiscal 1995 following its acquisition by the Company. The Company's Austro
Mold Group reported sales of $3,712,000 through July 15, 1996, compared with
$4,683,000 in fiscal 1995, a decrease of $971,000. A portion of the decrease in
Austro Mold Group sales was due to the closing of its Florida facility during
fiscal 1995, which reported sales of $308,000 for that year.
The continuing difficulties at Austro Mold contributed to the deterioration
of the Company's gross margins over the past few fiscal years. Fiscal 1996 gross
margin was 12.6%, versus 13.1% in fiscal 1995, 13.5% in fiscal 1994 and 17.7%
in fiscal 1993. Pricing pressure from the Company's principal customer was the
other primary reason for the gross margin declines. The Magnetic Assembly Group
gross margin was 14.8% in fiscal 1996 compared with 17.6% in the prior year. MTE
reported gross margins of 12.8% and 10.4% in fiscal years 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The Austro Mold Group reported gross margins of .9% and a
negative 2.6% in fiscal years 1996 and 1995, respectively.
5
<PAGE> 7
Fiscal 1996 selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$236,000, or 7%, from fiscal 1995. In fiscal 1995, selling, general and
administrative expenses included a $312,000 write-down related to the
acquisition of the remaining interest in MTE, primarily due to the write-off of
previously recognized profit in equipment manufactured by the Magnetic Assembly
Group and sold to MTE, as well as various costs associated with the acquisition.
Excluding the impact of the MTE write-down, the selling, general and
administrative costs of the Company decreased from 14% to 12% of net sales in
fiscal 1996. The decline was primarily the result of successful cost controls at
Austro Mold during the period preceding its sale, as well as increased sales
levels at MTE and a reduction in its selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of sales. The Company recorded a loss of $1,774,000 in
fiscal 1996 on the sale of the Austro Mold Group assets. The loss was the result
of three primary factors; a loss of $901,000 for the write-off of the remaining
unamortized cost of the noncompete agreement with the two previous owners of
Austro Mold, a loss of $533,000 on the sale of the fixed assets, and various
accrued expenses related to the sale. Interest expense increased $58,000, or
22%, as a result of increased borrowings during fiscal 1996. Total other income
and expenses improved by $104,000 in fiscal 1996 due to a $107,000 loss included
in fiscal 1995 results on the disposition of fixed assets, including the closing
of the Austro Mold Group Florida facility.
The Company incurred a net loss of $2,017,000 for fiscal 1996, compared
with a net loss of $775,000 for fiscal 1995. Included in the fiscal 1996 net
loss was a $1,774,000 loss related to the sale of the Austro Mold Group assets.
Included in the fiscal 1995 net loss was a $312,000 write-down related to the
acquisition of the remaining interest in MTE. Excluding those adjustments,
fiscal 1996 reported a loss of $242,000 and fiscal 1995 reported a loss of
$463,000. The losses in fiscal years 1996 and 1995 resulted primarily from
sizable losses for Austro Mold, as well as start-up costs for the MTE
subsidiary. The sales and profit performances of the Company's Magnetic Assembly
Group were insufficient to return the Company to profitability in the face of
Austro Mold's continued lower sales levels and operational problems.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company recorded sales of
$5,820,000, compared with sales of $5,887,000 for the fourth quarter of fiscal
1995, a slight decrease of $66,000. The Magnetic Assembly Group, MTE and Austro
Mold reported fourth quarter sales of $5,113,000, $460,000 and $247,000,
respectively. The fourth quarter gross margin for 1996 rebounded to 20% from 13%
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1995, resulting in net income of $204,000 for
the fiscal 1996 fourth quarter, compared with a net loss of $215,000 in the
fourth quarter of the previous year.
In fiscal 1995, the Company experienced a $4,593,000, or 26%, sales
increase, most of which was attributable to its Magnetic Assembly Group.
Magnetic assemblies, including remanufacturing, had revenues of $16,969,000 in
fiscal 1995, a $4,446,000 increase over fiscal 1994. The Company's total fiscal
1995 revenues were $22,210,000 versus $17,616,000 the prior year. Included are
Austro Mold Group sales of $4,683,000 and $5,094,000 in fiscal 1995 and fiscal
1994, respectively. MTE contributed $558,000 of sales in the last five months of
fiscal 1995 following its acquisition by the Company. The Company's fiscal 1995
gross margin decreased to 13.1% from 15.5% in fiscal 1994.
In fiscal 1995, selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$504,000, or 18%, from fiscal 1994; however, as a percentage of net sales, these
expenses decreased from 16% to 15%. Included in selling, general and
administrative expenses was a $312,000 write-down recorded in connection with
the acquisition of MTE, primarily related to the write-off of previously
recognized profit in equipment manufactured by the Magnetic Assembly Group and
sold to MTE, as well as various costs associated with the acquisition. Excluding
the impact of the MTE write-down, the selling, general and administrative costs
of the Company decreased to 14% of net sales. The decline was a result of
successful cost management efforts in fiscal 1995. Interest expense increased
$106,000, or 66%, as a result of increased borrowings and interest rates. Total
other income and expenses of $87,000 for fiscal 1995 included losses of $107,000
on the disposition of fixed assets.
6
<PAGE> 8
The Company incurred a net loss of $775,000 for fiscal 1995, compared with
a modest profit of $61,000 for fiscal 1994. Included in fiscal 1994 net income
was $676,000 of nonrecurring income representing the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle relating to income taxes. Excluding that
adjustment to income, fiscal 1994 resulted in an operating loss of $462,000. The
Company's loss before income taxes and extraordinary items was $774,000 and
$614,000 in fiscal years 1995 and 1994, respectively. The net loss in fiscal
1995 resulted from sizable losses at the Austro Mold Group as well as a net loss
of $98,000 for the MTE start-up operation. The rebound in sales and profit
performance of the Company's Magnetic Assembly Group was insufficient to return
the Company to profitability in the face of Austro Mold's lower sales levels and
continuing operational problems.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1995, the Company recorded sales of
$5,887,000, compared with sales of $4,323,000 for the fourth quarter of fiscal
1994, an increase of $1,564,000, or 36%. The increase was attributable to the
Magnetic Assembly Group remanufacturing business. In fiscal 1995, the fourth
quarter gross margin was 13% compared with 7% in the fourth quarter of fiscal
1994. The net loss for the fiscal 1995 fourth quarter was $215,000 compared with
a net loss of $627,000 in the fourth quarter of the previous year.
In fiscal 1996, the Magnetic Assembly Group reported a sales increase of
$2,516,000, or 15%. The increased sales were primarily attributable to increased
remanufacturing operations with the Company's largest customer. The Group's
gross margin declined to 14.8% from 17.6% the prior year due to continued
pricing pressure from that customer and lower margins in the remanufacturing
business. Magnetic Assembly's selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $84,000 from the prior year due to the inclusion of a $312,000
write-down in fiscal 1995 recorded in connection with the MTE acquisition. In
fiscal 1996, the Magnetic Assembly Group recorded a loss of $1,774,000 on the
sale of the Austro Mold Group assets. Excluding the impact of those nonrecurring
events, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $228,000;
however, as a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative costs
remained consistent as a percentage of net sales of 11%. The Magnetic Assembly
Group reported a net loss of $1,287,000 for the year ended July 31, 1996
compared with net income of $573,000 the prior year. Excluding the impact of the
nonrecurring events described above, the Group reported income of $487,000 and
$885,000 for fiscal years 1996 and 1995, respectively. The decrease of $398,000
is the result of the deterioration in the gross margin in fiscal 1996.
The Austro Mold Group reported sales of $3,713,000 through July 15, 1996
compared with $4,683,000 the prior fiscal year. The decrease of $971,000 is
partially attributable to the closing of its Florida facility, which reported
sales of $308,000 in fiscal 1995, as well as the continued deterioration of this
business. The gross margins were .9% in fiscal 1996 and a negative 2.6% in
fiscal 1995. The selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by
$297,000, and from 21% to 19% of net sales. The decrease was the result of cost
control procedures put into place by management during the period preceding the
sale of the Group. Austro Mold reported net losses of $690,000 and $1,250,000
in fiscal 1996 and fiscal 1995, respectively.
The Company's management does not believe that the losses which the Company
experienced in the last few fiscal years represent a pattern or continuing
trend. Management believes that the Company's magnetic assembly operations have
been strengthened by the broadened use of its technology in the areas of
remanufacturing, additional European business through MTE and an expanding
customer base.
The Company's backlog at July 31, 1996 was $8,513,000 compared with
$12,667,000 at July 31, 1995. The decrease in the backlog of $4,154,000 from
the previous year was the result of an unusually high backlog level at July 31,
1995.
As a result of the losses during the past three fiscal years, the Company's
liquidity has deteriorated. As of July 31, 1996, the Company's cash balance was
$846,000, versus $746,000 at July 31, 1995 and $400,000 at July 31, 1994;
working capital was $1,791,000, versus $2,623,000 and $2,854,000 at July 31,
1995 and 1994, respectively; the current ratio was 1.4 to 1.0 at July 31, 1996,
versus 1.5 to 1.0 and 2.0 to 1.0 at July 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Due to
increased borrowings to meet its cash needs, the Company's interest expense has
increased $58,000 in fiscal 1996 and $106,000 in fiscal 1995, despite better
loan terms which the Company obtained in a mid-year refinancing in fiscal 1995.
7
<PAGE> 9
In connection with the sale of the Austro Mold Group assets, the Company
received $916,000 cash, which was utilized to fund a principal payment of
$500,000 on the Company's revolving line of credit and for various expenses
related to the Austro Mold closing. In addition, the funds were used for a
$225,000 payment in settlement of the noncompete agreement with the previous
owners of Austro Mold. The settlement also requires a final payment of $207,000
in January 1997. Even though the Company's debt increased due to the acquisition
of MTE in March 1995 and the acquisition of its Austro Mold Group in November
1992, its cash flow should be adequate to fund the $207,000 settlement payment,
as well as the interest and principal on the current portion of long-term debt.
Operating cash flows in fiscal 1996 remained relatively consistent, showing
an improvement of $33,000 over the comparable period in fiscal 1995.
Cash provided by investing activities increased $1,242,000 in fiscal 1996
over the prior year. The increase is due to two factors; $916,000 cash proceeds
from the Austro Mold closing and decreased capital expenditures for production
equipment and vehicles.
Cash used by financing activities increased $1,517,000 in fiscal 1996 over
the prior year. The increase is the result of net loan payments over borrowings
of $446,000 in fiscal 1996 compared with net loan borrowings over payments of
$959,000 in fiscal 1995. In addition, fiscal 1995 cash flows included $113,000
of proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
In fiscal 1995, the Company was offered improved loan rates on its
then-existing bank debt and changed banks. The new loan accommodation remains
secured by the assets of the Company and includes both a $1,500,000 revolving
line of credit convertible into a term loan on March 1, 1997, as well as a
$1,250,000 line of credit. The maximum borrowing permitted under the revolving
line of credit was reduced from $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the
Austro Mold Group assets in fiscal 1996. At July 31, 1996, the Company had
$1,500,000 of principal outstanding on the revolving line of credit and
$1,010,000 on the line of credit. In connection with the MTE reacquisition, the
Company had a loan due to the Calder Group with an outstanding balance of
$188,000 at July 31, 1996. The Company also had other long-term debt totaling
$63,000 outstanding at July 31, 1996 and $296,000 of equipment leases with
another bank.
Capital expenditures totaled $319,000 in fiscal 1996, as compared with
$1,014,000 in fiscal 1995. Included in fiscal 1995 capital expenditures were
$112,000 of equipment financed with proceeds from the master lease line of
credit. The fiscal 1996 capital expenditures were financed with working capital
and a $184,000 advance on the Company's line of credit. Management estimates
that capital expenditures will approximate $425,000 in fiscal 1997, a portion of
which is expected to be funded with capital lease financing.
FROM TIME TO TIME, THE COMPANY MAY PUBLISH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
RELATING TO SUCH MATTERS AS ANTICIPATED FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, BUSINESS
PROSPECTS, TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS. ALL SUCH
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING ANTICIPATIONS, EXPECTATIONS AND
PROJECTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 10-KSB REPORT, ARE MADE BY THE COMPANY
PURSUANT TO THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION
REFORM ACT OF 1995. ALL SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES, AND ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM SUCH PROJECTIONS.
THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE COMPANY'S
DEPENDENCE UPON OBTAINING ORDERS FROM ITS CUSTOMERS TO SUPPLY COMPONENT PARTS
FOR CERTAIN OF THEIR PRODUCT LINES, WHICH ORDERS ARE IN TURN DEPENDENT UPON THE
MARKET SUCCESS OF THOSE PARTICULAR PRODUCTS -- A MATTER OVER WHICH THE COMPANY
HAS LITTLE INFLUENCE OR CONTROL.
8
<PAGE> 10
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Following is an index to the consolidated financial statements filed as
part of this report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Financial Statements Page No.
- -------------------- --------
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants 13
Consolidated Balance Sheets at July 31, 1996 and 1995 14
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended July 31, 1996 15
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the three years ended 16
July 31, 1996
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended July 31, 1996 17
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 18 - 29
</TABLE>
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART III
The information required by Items 9, 10, 11 and 12 of PART III of this
report is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's proxy statement
issued in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to
be held December 17, 1996, under the headings entitled "Voting Securities",
"Election of Directors", "Transactions Involving Directors and Executive
Officers", "Executive Compensation" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance", which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after
the end of fiscal 1996.
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The financial statements filed as a part of this report are listed in Item
7 above.
The exhibits filed with this report are listed on the Index to Exhibits on
pages 11-12 following the signature page and are numbered in accordance with
Item 601 of Regulation S-B. The Company will furnish a copy of the Exhibits
without charge to any stockholder submitting a written request addressed to
Susan M. Weise, Corporate Secretary, at 770 Linden Avenue, Rochester, New York
14625.
During the last quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company filed a report on Form
8-K dated July 15, 1996, relating to the Company's sale of its Austro Mold Group
assets. No financial statements were filed with the Form 8-K.
9
<PAGE> 11
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ Gordon H. McNeil
-------------------------------------
Gordon H. McNeil, President
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ Gordon H. McNeil
-----------------------------------------
Gordon H. McNeil, Director,
President, Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ Isadore Diamond
-----------------------------------------
Isadore Diamond, Director,
Chairman of the Board
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ Dana L. Limperis
-----------------------------------------
Dana L. Limperis, Controller
and Principal Accounting
Officer
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ G. Thomas Clark
-----------------------------------------
G. Thomas Clark, Director
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ Catherine D'Amico
-----------------------------------------
Catherine D'Amico, Director
Date: October 22, 1996 By: /s/ Bernard Kozel
-----------------------------------------
Bernard Kozel, Director
10
<PAGE> 12
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT STATUS OR INCORPORATION
NO. DESCRIPTION BY REFERENCE (IBR)
- ----------- ------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(3) (a) Certificate of Incorporation as amended to IBR to Exhibit A of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
date year ended July 31, 1994
(3) (b) By-Laws IBR to Exhibit A of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
year ended July 31, 1995
(10) (a) Sublease Agreement with Linden Properties IBR to Exhibit A of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
effective November 1, 1993 year ended July 31, 1993
(10) (b) Amendment to Sublease Agreement with Linden IBR to Exhibit B of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
Properties dated October 7, 1994 year ended July 31, 1994
(10) (c) Lease of Austro Mold facility, Rochester, IBR to Exhibit 5 of Form 8-K as amended dated
New York January 28, 1992
(10) (d) Share Purchase Agreement relative to the IBR to Exhibit 1 of Form 8-K as amended dated
acquisition of Magnetic Technologies Europe March 31, 1995
Limited
(10) (e) Credit Agreement, General Security IBR to Exhibit 3 of Form 8-K as amended dated
Agreement, Revolving Line of Credit Note and March 31, 1995
Commercial Line of Credit Note with First
National Bank of Rochester
(10) (f) Stock Option Contract held by IBR to Exhibit E of Form 10-K for fiscal year
G. Thomas Clark (a Director) dated ended July 31, 1992
September 18, 1992
(10) (g) Stock Option Contract held by IBR to Exhibit D of Form 10-K for fiscal year
Gordon H. McNeil (President and Chief ended July 31, 1992
Executive Officer) dated May 19, 1992
(10) (h) Stock Option Contract held by IBR to Exhibit B of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
Gordon H. McNeil (President and Chief year ended July 31, 1993
Executive Officer) dated January 7, 1993
(10) (i) Stock Option Contract held by IBR to Exhibit B of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
Bernard Kozel (a Director) dated year ended July 31, 1995
March 8, 1995
(10) (j) Asset Purchase Agreement relative to the Exhibit A to this Report
sale of the Austro Mold Group assets dated
July 15, 1996
(10) (k) Austro Mold sale Promissory Note, Security Exhibit B to this Report
Agreement and Subordination Agreement,
each dated July 12, 1996 or July 15, 1996
(10) (l) Sublease Agreement of Austro Mold facility Exhibit C to this Report
for lease term remainder dated July 15, 1996
</TABLE>
11
<PAGE> 13
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(CONTINUATION)
EXHIBIT STATUS OR INCORPORATION
NO. DESCRIPTION BY REFERENCE (IBR)
- -------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(10) (m) Promissory Note and Acceptance and Consent Exhibit D to this Report
in settlement of remaining obligations with
the former owners of Austro Mold, Inc.,
dated July 12, 1996 and
July 15, 1996, respectively
(21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant IBR to Exhibit C of Form 10-KSB for fiscal
year ended July 31, 1995
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE> 14
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Stockholders and
Board of Directors of
Magnetic Technologies Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the
related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in stockholders'
equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Magnetic Technologies Corporation and its subsidiary at July 31,
1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the three fiscal years in the period ended July 31, 1996, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, ACCOUNTING
FOR INCOME TAXES, in fiscal year 1994.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Rochester, New York
September 30, 1996
13
<PAGE> 15
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 31,
-----------------------------------
ASSETS 1996 1995
------------------ ------------
Current assets:
<S> <C> <C>
Cash, including interest-bearing deposits of $476,325, and $490,445
at July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively $ 846,363 $ 746,434
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $120,000
and $31,500 at July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 2,027,821 2,265,794
Inventories 3,470,874 4,182,773
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts in
process 291,288
Deferred income taxes 338,100 278,000
Prepaids and other current assets 100,140 109,613
------------ ------------
Current assets 6,783,298 7,873,902
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,992,635 3,877,951
Excess of cost over net assets acquired, net of accumulated amortization
of $127,154 at July 31, 1995 56,438
Deferred income taxes 454,400 514,500
Other assets 514,300 482,517
------------ ------------
$ 9,744,633 $ 12,805,308
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses $ 3,349,380 $ 3,961,287
Notes payable 1,217,830 826,108
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations 321,528 291,784
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts in
process 103,616 171,497
------------ ------------
Current liabilities 4,992,354 5,250,676
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations 1,726,243 2,533,666
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 6,718,597 7,784,342
------------ ------------
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock - $.15 par value;
Authorized - 15,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding - 2,786,584 and 2,786,675 shares at
July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 417,988 418,001
Stock warrants outstanding for 22,500 shares of common stock, valued at
$82,500, net of unamortized deferred expense of $26,895 and
$47,115 at July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively 55,605 35,385
Additional paid-in capital 7,645,921 7,646,302
Cumulative translation adjustment 2,359 479
Accumulated deficit (5,095,837) (3,079,201)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 3,026,036 5,020,966
------------ ------------
$ 9,744,633 $ 12,805,308
============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
14
<PAGE> 16
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 25,227,635 $ 22,209,634 $ 17,616,480
Cost of sales 22,056,953 19,290,099 15,241,215
------------- ------------- -------------
Gross profit 3,170,682 2,919,535 2,375,265
Selling, general and administrative expenses 3,105,905 3,341,450 2,837,504
Loss on sale of Austro Mold Group assets 1,774,167
------------- ------------- -------------
Operating loss (1,709,390) (421,915) (462,239)
Interest expense 323,192 265,233 159,395
Other (income) expense (16,446) 87,217 (7,355)
------------- ------------- -------------
Loss before income taxes and change in accounting
principle (2,016,136) (774,365) (614,279)
Provision for income taxes 500 500 500
------------- ------------- -------------
Loss before change in accounting principle (2,016,636) (774,865) (614,779)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
relating to income taxes 676,000
------------- ------------- -------------
Net (loss) income ($ 2,016,636) ($ 774,865) $ 61,221
============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------------ ------------------- --------------------
FULLY FULLY FULLY
PRIMARY DILUTED PRIMARY DILUTED PRIMARY DILUTED
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Loss) earnings per common
share:
Loss before change in
accounting principle ($.72) ($.72) ($.28) ($.28) ($.21) ($.21)
Change in accounting
principle .23 .23
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -------
Net (loss) income per share ($.72) ($.72) ($.28) ($.28) $.02 .02
======= ====== ====== ====== ====== =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
15
<PAGE> 17
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL
------------------------- STOCK PAID-IN ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT WARRANTS CAPITAL DEFICIT
--------- ---------- -------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at July 31, 1993 1,820,735 $273,110 $ 0 $ 7,630,371 ($2,365,557)
Effect of three-for-two
stock split 910,368 136,555 (136,555)
Fees relating to stock split (5,243)
Exercise of stock options 9,375 1,407 3,593
Repurchase and retirement of
fractional shares related
to stock split (621) (93) (108)
Tax benefits derived from
stock incentive plans 49,000
Stock warrants issued for
22,500 shares of common
stock 82,500
Deferral of stock warrants
issuance expense (82,500)
Amortization of deferred
stock warrants expense 15,165
Net income 61,221
--------- ---------- -------- ------------ ------------
Balance at July 31, 1994 2,739,857 410,979 15,165 7,541,058 ( 2,304,336)
Exercise of stock options 46,875 7,031 105,469
Repurchase and retirement of
fractional shares related
to stock split (57) (9) (225)
Amortization of deferred
stock warrants expense 20,220
Net loss (774,865)
--------- ---------- -------- ------------ ------------
Balance at July 31, 1995 2,786,675 418,001 35,385 7,646,302 ( 3,079,201)
Repurchase and retirement of
fractional shares related
to stock split (91) (13) (381)
Amortization of deferred
stock warrants expense 20,220
Net loss ( 2,016,636)
--------- ---------- -------- ------------ ------------
Balance at July 31, 1996 2,786,584 $ 417,988 $ 55,605 $ 7,645,921 ($5,095,837)
========= ========== ======== ============ ============
</TABLE>
The cumulative translation adjustment was $2,359 and $479 at July 31, 1996
and 1995, respectively.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
16
<PAGE> 18
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
----------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------ --------------- --------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net (loss) income ($ 2,016,636) ($ 774,865) $ 61,221
----------- ----------- -----------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities -
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (676,000)
Depreciation and amortization 1,006,508 1,079,062 988,353
Loss on disposal of property 3,788 106,734 910
Loss on sale of Austro Mold Group assets 1,774,167
Provision for bad debts 91,042 16,500 (9,719)
Imputed interest on long-term debt 20,056 9,153
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable 144,004 (98,048) 163,908
Decrease (increase) in inventories 393,617 (1,511,516) 60,969
Decrease (increase) in costs, estimated earnings and
billings on contracts in process 140,716 101,297 (29,121)
Increase in deferred income taxes (5,500)
Decrease (increase) in prepaids and other current
assets 1,809 (7,926) (28,262)
Payments under noncompete agreement (555,000) (330,000) (330,000)
Increase in other assets (16,825) (17,053) (77,166)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses (1,041,753) 1,344,753 25,982
Decrease in other long-term liabilities (9,045)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total adjustments 1,962,129 687,456 80,809
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities (54,507) (87,409) 142,030
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures (318,962) (902,346) (592,712)
Purchase of Magnetic Technologies Europe (MTE), net of
cash acquired (206,311)
Write-down of investment in MTE 312,302
Proceeds from sale of Austro Mold Group assets 916,497
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets 7,718 160,000 4,100
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 605,253 (636,355) (588,612)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings 602,500 3,457,758 660,000
Payments for expenses incurred for stock splits (5,243)
Principal payments on borrowings and capital leases (1,048,031) (2,498,581) (854,800)
Purchase and retirement of common stock (394) (234) (201)
Proceeds from stock options exercise 112,500 5,000
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities (445,925) 1,071,443 (195,244)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (4,892) (1,106)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash 99,929 346,573 (641,826)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 746,434 399,861 1,041,687
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 846,363 $ 746,434 $ 399,861
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
17
<PAGE> 19
MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The Company is engaged in the contract manufacturing business, including
development, manufacture and assembly of precision magnetic, electronic and
mechanical devices. The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware in
1969. The Company's corporate headquarters is located on Linden Avenue in
Rochester, New York. The Company's Austro Mold Group, sold in July 1996, was
engaged in the design and manufacture of precision plastic molds and custom
injection molded plastic parts and assemblies. Austro Mold had one facility in
Rochester, New York. Magnetic Technologies Europe Limited (MTE), a wholly-owned
foreign subsidiary effective March 1, 1995, is engaged in the same business as
the Company's traditional domestic operations, namely, the design and
manufacture of precision magnetic assemblies for office equipment manufacturers.
MTE has one facility located in Rochester, England. (See Notes 2 and 3.)
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with such principles requires the use of
estimates by management during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
for the periods presented and the accounts of its wholly-owned foreign
subsidiary, MTE, as of March 1, 1995. (See Note 3.) All significant intercompany
balances, transactions and profits are eliminated.
Translation of Foreign Currencies
Assets and liabilities of MTE are translated into U.S. dollars at currency
exchange rates in effect at the end of the balance sheet period. Revenues and
expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the related
income statement periods. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions are included in the results of operations. Gains and losses
resulting from the translation of the foreign subsidiary balance sheet are
recorded directly to the cumulative translation adjustment, a component of
stockholders' equity.
Revenue Recognition
The Company accounts for contracts for the manufacture of precision plastic
molds and custom tooling using the percentage of completion method of
accounting. Revenue is recognized in the ratio that costs incurred bear to total
estimated costs of the contracts. Contract costs include direct material and
labor costs as well as indirect costs related to contract performance. Losses
expected to be incurred are charged to operations in the period such losses are
determined.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being
determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed
principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the related assets, which range from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements
are amortized over the shorter of the related lease lives or the expected useful
lives of the improvements using the straight-line method.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. The costs of
renewals and betterments that increase the useful lives of property are
capitalized in the appropriate asset accounts. The gain or loss on items of
property retired or otherwise disposed of is credited or charged to operations,
and the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts.
18
<PAGE> 20
Excess of Cost Over Net Assets Acquired
Excess of cost over net assets acquired is amortized over ten years using
the straight-line method, or over the expected useful life of the related
intangible asset, whichever is shorter. During fiscal 1996, the remaining excess
of cost over net assets acquired was charged to expense.
Research and Development
The Company charges research and development expenditures to operations as
incurred.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all
highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and inventories are valued
at their carrying amounts, which are reasonable estimates of fair value. The
fair value of long-term debt is estimated using rates currently available to the
Company for debt with similar terms and maturities and is not materially
different from the carrying amount. The fair value of all other financial
instruments approximates cost as stated.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior years' financial statements were reclassified
to conform with current year presentation.
(Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
All per share amounts for fiscal 1996 and 1995 are based on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the period. The amounts do not
include any adjustments for stock options or warrants due to the antidilutive
effect they have on the net losses in those years. Per share amounts for
fiscal 1994 are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period after consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options
and warrants.
Weighted average shares of common stock were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
-------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Primary 2,786,644 2,779,521 2,948,161
Fully Diluted 2,786,644 2,779,521 2,963,865
</TABLE>
Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 (SFAS 121), ACCOUNTING FOR THE IMPAIRMENT
OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS TO BE DISPOSED OF, effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 1995. The Statement requires that long-lived assets and
certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not
be recoverable. The adoption of SFAS 121 is not expected to significantly
impact the Company's future operating results.
19
<PAGE> 21
The FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS
123), ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1995, which establishes accounting and reporting
for stock-based employee compensation plans. This Statement defines a fair value
based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity
instrument, but also allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost
for those plans using the current method of accounting prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK ISSUED TO
EMPLOYEES. The Company has elected not to change its method of accounting for
employee stock options and will provide the pro forma fair value disclosures
required by the new pronouncement.
NOTE 2 - SALE OF AUSTRO MOLD GROUP ASSETS:
During fiscal 1993, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the
outstanding stock of Austro Mold, Inc. Austro Mold was engaged in the
manufacture of precision plastic molds and custom plastic injection molding and
assembly. The effective date of the transaction was November 1, 1992 and was
reflected under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. The
purchase price was $1,910,177 before cash acquired of $128,789. The purchase was
financed with a $2,000,000 revolving line of credit at an interest rate of prime
plus .5%, which was refinanced during fiscal 1995 at a reduced interest rate of
prime plus .25%. (See Note 8.) The Company also assumed and retired Austro
Mold's bank indebtedness of $725,000 from working capital during fiscal 1993.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into a noncompete
agreement with the two previous owners of Austro Mold. The agreement was
effective from November 1992 through December 2000 and required payment of
$1,650,000 in 60 equal monthly installments commencing January 1993. The cost of
the noncompete agreement was being amortized to expense ratably over the period
in which it was in effect. The total amortization expense was $193,622, $202,041
and $202,041 for fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The excess of
unamortized cost of $1,074,388 over the remaining amount due under the agreement
of $797,500, or $276,888, was reflected in other assets at July 31, 1995.
On July 15, 1996, the Company sold the Austro Mold fixed assets, the mold
manufacturing work in process and the majority of the plastics injection molding
inventory to an unrelated third party. In exchange for these assets, the Company
received cash of $916,497 and a promissory note receivable of $342,683. The
purchaser also assumed three capital lease obligations totaling $168,325 for
various manufacturing equipment. The Company remains obligated under the leases
as a secondary guarantor, with the purchaser's vice president and majority
shareholder as the primary guarantor on the leases.
The promissory note receivable is payable in 48 equal monthly payments at a
stated rate of interest of 8% with payments and the accrual of interest
commencing on August 15, 1997. The note was discounted to $311,846 to reflect
the accrual of interest from the closing at the Company's 8.5% bank borrowing
rate on the date of closing. The discounted balance of $311,846 was reflected in
other assets at July 31, 1996. The note is secured by the personal guarantee of
the purchaser's vice president and majority shareholder and by the conveyed
fixed assets, subordinated to the purchaser's bank security interests.
In connection with the sale, the Company's remaining obligation of $467,500
under the noncompete agreement with the two previous owners of Austro Mold was
settled for a payment of $225,000 at closing and $207,572 payable in January
1997. The unamortized cost of the noncompete agreement of $900,766 at July 31,
1996 was charged to the loss on the sale in fiscal 1996.
The Company incurred a total loss on the sale of the Austro Mold Group
assets of $1,774,167, which was included in the net loss for fiscal 1996. (See
also Notes 6, 8, 9 and 14.)
20
<PAGE> 22
NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE AND SALE OF TECHNOLOGY:
In April 1993, Magnetic Technologies Corporation (MTC) entered into an
agreement with the Cookson Group plc (Cookson) of London, England, to form a new
company, Magnetic Technologies Europe Limited (MTE), to manufacture and sell
precision magnetic, electronic and mechanical devices in Europe. Headquartered
in Rochester, England, MTE was capitalized with $1,000,000, of which $750,000
was contributed by Cookson for all of the voting "A" shares of stock and
$250,000 was contributed by MTC for all of the nonvoting "B" shares of stock,
constituting a 25% interest in MTE. The investment in MTE was accounted for
under the cost method due to the Company's inability to exercise any influence
over the operating and financial policies of MTE. The Company had no voting
stock, no voting Board members, no policy-making influence, and no interchange
of personnel. Thus, management believes that the cost method of accounting for
this transaction was appropriate.
Concurrent with the formation of MTE, the Company sold Cookson and MTE a
license for the use of the Company's technology in connection with the
manufacture of products to be sold in Europe and the Near East. Cookson paid the
Company $1,250,000 for the technology and the Company agreed to discontinue
selling to the European market. (The Company's export sales in the immediately
preceding twelve month period had aggregated $2,200,000.) At the closing of the
transaction, Cookson also placed a $1,040,000 order on behalf of itself and MTE
for the Company to produce manufacturing machinery and related software to be
shipped to England.
In March 1994, Cookson sold certain of its businesses to Calder Group
Limited (Calder) and Calder's subsidiary, Magnet Applications Limited, became
the owner of all of MTE's voting "A" shares of stock. A year later, Calder
decided to dispose of certain of its operations, including MTE. On March 31,
1995, the Company acquired all of the voting shares of stock of MTE from
Calder's subsidiary. The acquisition was effective as of February 28, 1995 and
the accounts of MTE are consolidated with those of the Company from March 1,
1995 forward. The purchase price of the acquisition of the remaining 75%
interest in MTE was $492,007 plus closing costs of $23,054, before cash acquired
of $3,340. In connection with the acquisition, the Company incurred a note
payable to Calder of $351,000, payable in equal monthly installments of $9,750
over a 36 month period commencing May 1, 1995. The note payable to Calder has no
stated interest; therefore, interest was imputed at a rate of 9.25%. The balance
of the note payable, less imputed interest, was $305,410 at acquisition. The
loan was reflected in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as current
portion of long-term debt of $103,908 and long-term debt of $84,461 at July 31,
1996. (See Note 8.)
Prior to the acquisition of the remaining 75% of the outstanding stock of
MTE in March 1995, the Company evaluated its investment in MTE by reviewing the
monthly operating performance to determine whether any permanent impairment in
the value of its investment had occurred. These reviews took into consideration
MTE's performance as compared with budgets as well as the start-up plan for the
company. Based upon those evaluations, the Company had determined that the value
of the investment had not been impaired.
Effective March 1, 1995, the acquisition of the remaining 75% interest in
MTE was completed, and the transaction was accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting for business combinations. Since MTE became a wholly-owned
subsidiary, the Company recorded a $312,302 write-down of its investment in MTE
to account for an impairment in asset value, primarily related to the write-off
of previously recognized profit in equipment manufactured by MTC and sold to
MTE, as well as various costs related to the acquisition. The write-down was
included in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 1995. The
accounts of MTE are included in the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of March 1, 1995 forward.
21
<PAGE> 23
The following tables present unaudited pro forma results of operations as
if the acquisition of MTE had occurred at the beginning of each of the periods
presented, after giving effect to certain adjustments for intercompany
transactions, depreciation, interest and related income tax effects. These
pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not
purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition been
made at the beginning of the periods presented or of results which may occur in
the future.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRO FORMA RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1994
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net Sales $ 22,420,698 $ 17,323,672
Cost of sales 19,364,900 15,437,090
------------ ------------
Gross profit 3,055,798 1,886,582
Selling, general and administration expenses 3,684,645 3,200,201
------------ ------------
Operating loss (628,847) (1,313,619)
Interest, other income and expenses 415,621 208,289
------------ ------------
Loss before income taxes and change in accounting
principle (1,044,468) (1,521,908)
Provision for income taxes 500 500
------------ ------------
Loss before change in accounting principle ($ 1,044,968) ($ 1,522,408)
============ ============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRO FORMA RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
-------------------------------
1995 1994
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Loss per common share:
Loss before change in accounting principle
Primary ($.38) ($.56)
Fully diluted ($.38) ($.56)
Weighted average number of shares
Primary 2,779,521 2,736,545
Fully diluted 2,779,521 2,736,545
NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES:
Inventories consist of the following:
JULY 31,
-------------------------------
1996 1995
------------ ------------
Raw material $ 1,995,447 $ 2,558,700
Work in process 1,400,556 1,271,105
Finished goods 74,871 352,968
------------ ------------
$ 3,470,874 $ 4,182,773
============ ============
</TABLE>
22
<PAGE> 24
NOTE 5 - COSTS, ESTIMATED EARNINGS AND BILLINGS ON CONTRACTS IN PROCESS:
The following is a summary of costs, estimated earnings and billings on
contracts in process:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Costs and estimated earnings $ 87,134 $ 1,136,537
Billings to date (190,750) (1,016,746)
----------- -----------
($ 103,616) $ 119,791
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Costs, estimated earnings and billings were presented in the accompanying
balance sheet as:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 31,
---------------------------
1996 1995
---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
contracts in process $ 0 $ 291,288
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
contracts in process (103,616) (171,497)
---------- ---------
($ 103,616) $ 119,791
========== =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 6 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Major classifications of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995
---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Equipment under capital lease $ 537,513 $ 844,202
Machinery and engineering equipment 3,405,256 4,887,098
Furniture and fixtures 1,414,578 1,393,874
Leasehold improvements 378,326 513,453
Vehicles 46,320 101,243
Construction in process 116,526
---------- -----------
5,781,993 7,856,396
LESS: Accumulated depreciation and amortization 3,789,358 3,978,445
---------- -----------
$ 1,992,635 $ 3,877,951
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accumulated amortization for capital leases was $137,133 and $157,379
at July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Amortization expense was $76,835,
$90,756 and $53,909 in fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
On March 31, 1995, the Company closed its Austro Mold Group Clearwater,
Florida plant. The Company sold the machinery and equipment of the Florida plant
to a local business for $158,000. The Company recognized a $35,000 loss on the
sale of those assets during fiscal 1995.
On July 15, 1996, the Company sold its Austro Mold Group's fixed assets to
an unrelated third party. The book value of these assets at the time of the sale
was $1,449,139, for which the Company received $916,497. The Company recognized
a loss on the sale of these assets of $532,642 in fiscal 1996. (See also
Note 2.)
23
<PAGE> 25
NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE:
Notes payable at July 31, 1996, consisted of $1,010,258 outstanding on the
Company's bank line of credit and $207,572 payable in January 1997 related to
the settlement of the noncompete agreement with the two previous owners of
Austro Mold. (See Note 2.) At July 31, 1996, the Company had $239,742 available
under its bank line of credit bearing interest at prime plus .25%. The Company
utilized $409,158 of its available line of credit during fiscal 1996.
The line of credit is collateralized by equipment, receivables, contract
rights and inventory of the Company. The line of credit agreement contains a
provision requiring the Company to maintain a 30 day out of debt period during
each 12 month period. The Company has obtained a waiver from its bank related to
this provision for fiscal 1996 and fiscal 1997.
NOTE 8 - LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
PRINCIPAL BALANCE
CURRENT JULY 31,
INTEREST PORTION ------------------------------
DESCRIPTION DUE DATE RATE DUE 1996 1995
- -------------------- ---------------- ------------- ----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revolving bank line March 2002 (see
of credit conversion option
outlined below) Prime + .25% $ 81,460 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,806,650
Obligations under Various to
capital leases February 2000 6.95% to 9.15% 125,548 295,914 644,975
Calder loan April 1998 Imputed 9.25% 103,908 188,369 283,130
Other long-term debt March 2002 5.00% 10,612 63,488 90,695
--------- ----------- -----------
$ 321,528 2,047,771 2,825,450
=========
LESS: Current portion due within one year 321,528 291,784
----------- -----------
$ 1,726,243 $ 2,533,666
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The bank prime rate was 8.25% at July 31, 1996.
During fiscal 1996, the Company utilized the remaining $193,350 of its
available balance on the revolving bank line of credit. In connection with the
sale of the Company's Austro Mold Group assets in fiscal 1996, the Company made
a principal payment of $500,000 on the note, and the maximum allowable borrowing
under the note was reduced to $1,500,000. (See Note 2.) The revolving line of
credit requires interest payments at prime plus .25% through March 1, 1997,
when the principal balance can be refinanced at the Company's option under a
five-year term loan at the same interest rate as the note. It is the current
intention of the Company's management to refinance the note under the five-year
term loan option; therefore, an appropriate portion of the note has been
reclassified to current portion of long-term debt in the Company's balance
sheet at July 31, 1996 and is reflected accordingly in the five-year repayment
table below. The revolving line of credit had no available balance at July 31,
1996. The note is collateralized by the equipment, inventory, accounts
receivable and other personal property of the Company. The revolving line of
credit agreement contains, among other covenants, provisions pertaining to
mergers and acquisitions, capital expenditures, payment of dividends, tangible
net worth, working capital and debt ratios. The Company is in compliance with
or has obtained waivers related to the restrictive covenants at July 31, 1996.
The Company had an available master lease line of credit of $1,000,000 with
its previous bank, which was eliminated during fiscal 1995. Two outstanding
balances under the lease line of credit were eliminated in connection with the
sale of the Austro Mold Group assets during fiscal 1996. (See Note 2.) The
Company remains obligated under these leases as a secondary guarantor. The
outstanding total of the remaining lease line of credit balances was $295,914 at
July 31, 1996. These lease balances require monthly payments totaling $11,919
including 7.31% interest. The lease balances mature in October 1998. The total
obligations under capital leases are secured by equipment with a net book value
of $400,380 at July 31, 1996.
24
<PAGE> 26
During fiscal 1996, the Company became the guarantor for a maximum
liability of $100,000 for its wholly-owned subsidiary, MTE, with respect to a
vendor relationship.
Future principal payments on long-term debt are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTES CAPITAL OTHER LONG-
PAYABLE LEASES TERM DEBT
---------- -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fiscal 1997 $ 185,368 $125,548 $10,612
Fiscal 1998 343,105 135,040 10,318
Fiscal 1999 281,506 35,326 10,846
Fiscal 2000 306,388 11,401
Fiscal 2001 333,470 11,984
Later 238,532 8,327
---------- -------- -------
$1,688,369 $295,914 $63,488
========== ======== =======
</TABLE>
NOTE 9 - OPERATING LEASES:
The Company leases office and manufacturing facilities and vehicles. Lease
terms range from one to seven years, with renewal options for additional
periods. Rental expense charged to operations amounted to $613,619, $590,868
and $748,600 during fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The Linden
Avenue facility is leased from a related party. (See Note 12.)
The Austro Mold Group Rochester, New York plant was subleased in connection
with the sale of the Austro Mold Group assets effective July 15, 1996. The
sublease requires monthly payments of $11,500 through December 1997. The Company
remains obligated under the original lease for the plant for $13,650 per month
through December 1997. The difference in the monthly lease rentals of $2,150 per
month is reflected in the future minimum payments required under the
noncancelable operating lease schedule below. The difference in rental payments
and rental receipts for the remainder of the lease term, or $36,550, was accrued
and reflected in the loss on the sale of the Austro Mold Group assets for the
year ended July 31, 1996. (See Note 2.)
Future minimum payments required under noncancelable operating leases are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FACILITIES VEHICLES
------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal 1997 $ 391,411 $11,509
Fiscal 1998 376,364
Fiscal 1999 365,616
Fiscal 2000 365,616
Fiscal 2001 91,404
----------- -------
$ 1,590,411 $11,509
=========== =======
</TABLE>
NOTE 10 - COMMON STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS, STOCK WARRANTS AND INCENTIVE PLANS:
On March 8, 1995, the Company issued stock options to a director for the
purchase of 5,000 shares of the Company's $ .15 par value common stock. The
options were immediately exercisable at a price of $4.63 per share until the
earlier of their expiration date on March 7, 2000, or after a specified period
upon termination of the director's position with the Company. Also during fiscal
1995, a director exercised 9,375 of previously granted stock options. (See
Note 12.)
The Company declared a three-for-two stock split which became effective
February 16, 1994, increasing the number of outstanding shares of common stock
by 910,368. The split was approved by the Board of Directors to create
additional liquidity in the Company's stock and thereby provide a more efficient
trading market for stockholders. In connection with the stock split, $136,555
was transferred from additional paid-in capital to common stock. The transfer
was reflected in the Company's balance sheet as of July 31, 1994. Payment was
made to stockholders for any fractional share interests.
25
<PAGE> 27
In December 1993, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation increasing the authorized shares of common stock
from 5,000,000 to 15,000,000 and eliminating a series of authorized but unissued
preferred stock. Also in December 1993, 9,375 shares of common stock were issued
to a director upon exercise of outstanding stock options.
In November 1993, the Company issued stock warrants for 22,500 shares of
common stock to an investment securities consultant. The warrants are
exercisable at a price of $5.00 per share of common stock and expire on
December 31, 1997. The warrants were valued at $82,500 utilizing the
Black-Scholes method of securities valuation. The deferred expense related to
the issuance of the warrants is being amortized ratably to expense over a
period of 49 months. The unamortized deferred expense was $26,895 and $47,115
at July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The value of the outstanding warrants,
net of unamortized deferred expense, or $55,605 and $35,385, was reflected in
stockholders' equity at July 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
In January 1993, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of stock
options aggregating 225,000 shares to two officers of the Company. The options
have an exercise price of $2.50 per share. The options vest at a rate of 75,000
shares per year starting in fiscal 1994. During fiscal 1995, 37,500 of the
options were exercised and 75,000 of the options expired upon termination of
employment of one of the officers. The remaining options expire at the earlier
of January 2003 or within a specified period after termination of employment.
(See Note 12.)
In September 1992, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of stock
options to a director for 7,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$2.55 per share. The options expire in September 1997. (See Note 12.)
In May 1992, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of stock
options to an officer of the Company aggregating 150,000 shares at an exercise
price of $2.33 per share. These shares expire at the earlier of May 1997 or
within a specified period after termination of employment. (See Note 12.)
All stock options and warrants granted by the Company were issued at the
fair market value price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.
There was no activity in the outstanding number of stock options during
fiscal 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTION PRICE
SUMMARY OF STOCK OPTIONS NUMBER RANGE PER SHARE
----------------------------------- ------------ ----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding July 31, 1993 401,250 $ .53 - $2.55
Exercised (9,375) $ .53
-------
Outstanding July 31, 1994 391,875 $2.00 - $2.55
Granted 5,000 $4.63
Exercised (46,875) $2.00 - $2.50
Expired (75,000) $2.50
-------
Outstanding July 31, 1995 and
July 31, 1996 275,000 $2.34 - $4.63
=======
Exercisable at July 31, 1996 237,500 $2.34 - $4.63
=======
</TABLE>
The number of shares and option price per share have been adjusted to
reflect the three-for-two stock split which occurred in fiscal 1994.
Subsequent to July 31, 1996, the Company issued stock options to purchase
87,500 shares of common stock under the 1996 Stock Option Plan approved by the
Board of Directors. The options were issued to a consultant and Company
employees. (See Note 15.)
26
<PAGE> 28
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES:
Effective August 1, 1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109), ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES. The
adoption of SFAS 109 changed the Company's method of accounting for income taxes
from the deferred method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 11 (APB
11), ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES to an asset and liability approach. Previously,
the Company deferred the past tax effects of timing differences between
financial reporting and taxable income. The asset and liability approach
requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. The adjustment to the August 1,
1993 balance sheet to adopt SFAS 109 amounted to $676,000. This amount was
reflected in net income for fiscal 1994 as the cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle. It primarily represented the impact of adjusting deferred
taxes to reflect the existing net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
The Company had no provision for federal income taxes in fiscal years 1996,
1995 or 1994.
The following tables summarize the current and long-term deferred tax
assets and the related valuation allowances:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JULY 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995
--------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Current deferred tax assets:
Accrued expenses $ 252,600 $ 109,700
Inventory 28,500 44,800
Warranty reserves 10,300 15,100
Other deferred tax assets 46,700 11,800
Losses on fixed asset disposals 96,600
--------- ---------
$ 338,100 $ 278,000
========= =========
AT JULY 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995
--------- ---------
Long-term deferred tax assets:
Federal net operating loss carryforwards $ 832,600 $ 306,700
State net operating loss carryforwards 202,100 45,500
Federal investment tax credit carryforwards 40,900 96,300
State investment tax credit carryforwards 272,700 218,300
Federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards 51,000 51,000
State alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards 6,000 6,000
Depreciation 430,500 315,500
Other deferred tax assets 90,000 102,900
--------- ---------
1,925,800 1,142,200
LESS: Valuation allowance 1,471,400 627,700
--------- ---------
$ 454,400 $ 514,500
========= =========
</TABLE>
The federal net operating loss carryforwards expire periodically from
fiscal years 2002 through 2011, while federal tax credit carryforwards expire
periodically from fiscal years 1997 through 2002. For state tax purposes, the
net operating loss carryforwards expire periodically from fiscal years 2009
through 2011 and tax credit carryforwards expire periodically through fiscal
year 2011.
The realization of the deferred tax assets related to the net operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income. In addition, if certain substantial changes in the Company's
ownership should occur, there would be an annual limitation on the amount of
net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards which could be utilized.
27
<PAGE> 29
NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTIES:
Nonqualified stock options for the purchase of 9,375 shares at $.53 per
share were issued to a director during fiscal 1989. The director exercised the
options in December 1993. An additional 9,375 of nonqualified stock options for
the purchase of common stock at $2.00 per share were issued to the same director
during fiscal 1990. The director exercised these options during fiscal 1995. In
fiscal 1992, 150,000 stock options at $2.33 per share were issued to an officer.
In September 1992, the Company issued stock options to a director for the
purchase of 7,500 shares at $2.55 per share. In fiscal 1993, the Company issued
stock options to two officers for the purchase of 225,000 shares of common stock
at $2.50 per share. During fiscal 1995, 37,500 of the options were exercised and
75,000 of the options expired upon termination of employment of one of the
officers. Also during fiscal 1995, 5,000 options for the purchase of common
stock were issued to a director at $4.63 per share. (See Note 10.)
Since fiscal 1985, the Company has subleased office and manufacturing space
from a partnership, in which the Chairman of the Board of the Company is a 50%
partner and the other 50% partner is a stockholder of the Company. The current
term of the sublease is seven years and requires monthly rental payments of
$30,468. The sublease also requires the Company to pay real estate taxes,
maintenance and utility costs. Rent expense for the facility amounted to
$365,616, $367,680 and $368,400 in fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
During fiscal 1989, the Company entered into a one-year operating lease
agreement with the aforementioned partnership for manufacturing equipment. The
lease was renewable at the option of the Company for four consecutive one-year
periods, and was renewed through the first quarter of fiscal 1994. The original
agreement required rental payments of $20,000 per month. The lease was
renegotiated effective August 1993 and the monthly rental was lowered to $9,000
until November 1993, when the Company purchased the equipment and financed it
under a capital lease with a bank. (See Note 8.) Rental expense for the
equipment amounted to $27,000 in fiscal year 1994.
The Company also contracts with a local firm, owned by the stockholder
referred to above, for the construction of various building renovations and
improvements at an aggregate cost to the Company of $20,000, $68,000 and $21,000
in fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
NOTE 13 - BUSINESS SEGMENT AND MAJOR CUSTOMER INFORMATION:
The Company operates in one business segment defined as contract
manufacturing. This segment encompasses both the manufacture and assembly of
precision magnetic, electronic and mechanical devices at the Magnetic Assembly
Group and Magnetic Technologies Europe, as well as the design and manufacture of
precision plastic molds and custom injection molded plastic parts and assemblies
previously performed at the Austro Mold Group prior to the sale of its assets in
July 1996. All three units of the Company's business were effectively integrated
since the acquisition of Austro Mold in November 1992 and the acquisition of MTE
in February 1995. (See Notes 2 and 3.)
Sales outside the United States, principally to Europe and Canada, amounted
to $3,269,000, $1,851,000 and $1,140,000 in fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
During the years ended July 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, gross sales to one
customer amounted to $20,261,000, $16,494,000 and $10,755,000, respectively.
28
<PAGE> 30
NOTE 14 - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES TO STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS:
The following transactions represent noncash investing and financing
activities:
YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1996:
During fiscal 1996, a promissory note of $342,683, discounted to $311,846,
was received by the Company in connection with the sale of the Austro Mold Group
assets. (See Note 2.)
YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1995:
During fiscal 1995, capital lease obligations of $111,807 were incurred
when the Company entered into a lease for new manufacturing equipment.
During fiscal 1995, a loan of $305,410 was incurred in connection with the
acquisition of MTE. The loan is payable to the previous parent company of MTE.
(See Note 3.)
YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1994:
During fiscal 1994, capital lease obligations of $614,395 were incurred
when the Company entered into leases for new manufacturing equipment and
refinanced an existing operating lease.
During fiscal 1994, the Company declared a three-for-two stock split. In
connection with the split, $136,555 of additional paid-in capital was
transferred to common stock issued and outstanding.
During fiscal 1994, the Company realized a $49,000 tax benefit from
employee stock incentive plans. The impact of the benefit was reflected as an
increase to stockholders' equity at July 31, 1994.
NOTE 15 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT:
Subsequent to July 31, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors approved the
1996 Stock Option Plan, subject to stockholder vote and approval at the December
17, 1996 Annual Meeting. The plan authorizes the Board of Directors to grant
qualified incentive stock options and non-qualified options for the purchase of
the Company's common stock to directors, officers, key employees and
consultants. Twelve key employees received qualified incentive stock option
grants under the plan to purchase an aggregate of 77,500 shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $3.50 per share. A consultant also received a
non-qualified option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at the same
price. All of these option grants are subject to approval of the plan by the
stockholders at the Annual Meeting. (See also Note 10.)
29
<PAGE> 31
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
G. Thomas Clark
Catherine D'Amico
Isadore Diamond
Chairman of the Board
Bernard Kozel
Gordon H. McNeil
President & Chief Executive Officer
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
Susan M. Weise
Corporate Secretary and Treasurer
Magnetic Technologies Corporation
770 Linden Avenue
Rochester, New York 14625
(716) 385-8711
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Price Waterhouse LLP
1900 Chase Square
Rochester, New York 14604
LEGAL COUNSEL
Gerald B. Fincke
2300 East Graves Avenue
Orange City, Florida 32763
REGISTRAR & TRANSFER AGENT
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
2 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
