<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 [Fee Required]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the Transition period from _____________________________
Commission File Number 1-8063
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
CALIFORNIA 94-6181186
------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1300 ETHAN WAY, SUITE 200, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95825
------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (916) 929-8244
--------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
------------------------------------ -----------------------
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest New York Stock Exchange
$1.00 par value ("Common Shares") Pacific Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for
at least the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Sequential Page: 01 of 45
Exhibit Index: Page 38
<PAGE> 2
Indicate by check mark whether if disclosure of disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[ ]
MARKET VALUE
Based on the closing sales price of $1-3/4 per share, the aggregate market value
of the outstanding Common Shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of
March 3, 1995 was $3,845,408.
OUTSTANDING SHARES
As of March 3, 1995, there were 9,156,969 outstanding Common Shares. The Common
Shares are listed on the New York and Pacific Stock Exchanges (trading symbol
"CT"). Trading is reported in many newspapers as "Cal RE" (CUSIP No. 130559107).
<PAGE> 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I PAGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Item 1. Business 1 - 3
Item 2. Properties 4
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 5
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART II
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Security
Holder Matters 6 - 7
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 8
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations 8 - 12
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 13
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure 34
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART III
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 10. Trustees and Executive Officers of the Registrant 35 - 36
Item 11. Executive Compensation 36
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 36
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 37
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART IV
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 38 - 39
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(i)
<PAGE> 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
==============================================================================
Item 1. Business
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL
California Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Trust" or "CalREIT") is a
self-administered real estate investment trust ("REIT") formed in 1966 in
California as a real estate trust. CalREIT has engaged primarily in the
acquisition, management, and disposition of commercial property and mortgage
investments for 29 years through various real estate market cycles.
CalREIT's Common Shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the
Pacific Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "CT".
The Trust's investment portfolio currently includes both fee title ownership of
real property as well as mortgage notes. It owns five properties located in
five market areas in the western United States. The $18.4 million real estate
portfolio encompasses one office property in Scottsdale, Arizona; a warehouse
storage facility in Pasadena, California; a hotel property near San Luis
Obispo, California; a shopping center in Sacramento, California and a 60%
interest in a retail/office property in Kirkland, Washington in the Seattle
metropolitan area. The commercial properties encompass approximately 273,000
rentable square feet; the hotel has 113 guest rooms plus food and beverage
service.
The Trust's mortgage note portfolio consists of approximately $20.7 million in
loans, valued at approximately $13.5 million, which bear interest at an overall
effective rate of approximately 8% and are collateralized by mortgages on real
property. Most of the investments in the eight loans were done in connection
with the disposition of Trust properties prior to 1994.
In 1994, total income to the Trust came from the following sources: 69% from
rental income and 36% from interest income less a 5% loss from the sale of a
property. As of year-end, the Trust had approximately $3.4 million in cash. The
Trust is not involved in any foreign operations, nor does it derive any income
from foreign sources. At year-end, the Trust was 48% leveraged reflecting
outstanding mortgage debt obligations of approximately $8.7 million; its
debt-to-equity ratio was approximately 1:3.
The Trust has operated and intends to continue to operate to qualify as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code thereby preserving certain tax benefits for its
shareholders that are available through such qualification.
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
On April 14, 1994, The Peregrine Real Estate Trust (formerly Commonwealth
Equity Trust) as majority shareholder owning 76% of CalREIT's outstanding
Common Shares, voted its common stock to elect a new Board of Trustees all of
whom were key management personnel of The Peregrine Real Estate Trust
("Peregrine"). Subsequently the Board was changed and is now comprised of one
outside Trustee who also serves on Peregrine's Board of Trustees, and two
remaining Trustees, both of whom are executive officers of Peregrine and one of
whom is also a
1
<PAGE> 5
Trustee of Peregrine. In order that the majority of its Trustees be
independent, at its next annual meeting of shareholders, the Trust will add to
its slate two additional candidates to serve as outside Trustees.
Peregrine emerged from bankruptcy on October 7, 1994 pursuant to its Third
Amended Plan of Reorganization as modified (the "Plan") which was confirmed by
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
Division on August 8, 1994. The Plan provided for the restructuring of
virtually all of Peregrine's secured and unsecured debt. As a result, a lender
group for which the Prudential Life Insurance Company of America acts as agent
(the "Lender Group") owns 52% of the common stock and 100% of the preferred
stock of The Peregrine Real Estate Trust; it also received Restructured Secured
Notes from Peregrine in the original amount of $40 million. Under the Note
Agreement, without permission and terms approved by the Lender Group, Peregrine
cannot vote to allow CalREIT to merge or acquire substantially all of the
assets of any company or entity other than Peregrine; or to form or acquire any
subsidiary or sell substantially all of the Trust's assets. Other than as
disclosed above, CalREIT is not affected in any material way by Peregrine's
operations under the Plan.
MANAGEMENT OF THE TRUST'S INVESTMENTS
In 1994, CalREIT became self-administered, elected the new Board of Trustees
and appointed new executive officers for the Trust. Frank A. Morrow is Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Arnold E. Brown is Chief Financial
Officer. Although the Trust is self-administered, it has no employees. All
management services are provided by employees of The Peregrine Real Estate
Trust (for whom Peregrine receives a reimbursement of costs pursuant to a cost
allocation agreement) or by independent contractors.
Upon installation of the new management group, CalREIT terminated its advisory
and management agreements with B & B Property Investment, Development and
Management Company, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, B & B Property, Inc.
CalREIT also terminated its agreement with North Main Street Company which
operated the Trust's hotel property.
Shortly thereafter, on April 29, 1994, United Property Services, Inc.
("UPSI") was engaged as the new property manager for the Trust's
commercial property assets. UPSI operates under an agreement that automatically
runs for consecutive month-to-month terms, but is terminable by either the
Trust or UPSI upon 30 days notice. On June 1, 1994, CapStar, a professional
hotel management company was signed to lease the Best Western Casa Grande Motor
Inn. Other agreements were signed with leasing firms in the Trust's various
market areas as part of a program to increase occupancy and rental income at
its commercial properties. As of year-end, the average weighted occupancy level
for the commercial property portfolio was 85% and 40% at the hotel property.
In addition, with respect to the Trust's note portfolio, foreclosure
proceedings were initiated against two delinquent noteholders and other
delinquency issues were resolved.
The rules and regulations adopted by various federal, state and local
government agencies concerning environmental controls in the operation of real
property may adversely affect existing property operations or reduce future
investment opportunities. While the Trust does not believe that environmental
controls have had a material impact on its activities to date, there can be no
assurance that the Trust will not be adversely affected in the future.
2
<PAGE> 6
During the last three fiscal years, the Trust has been involved in only one
industry segment: acquiring, operating and holding for investment
income-producing properties and making mortgage loans secured by real property.
The Trust's financial and operating performance information is set forth in the
accompanying financial statements.
During the latter part of 1994, the Trust began to explore alternative
strategies to grow the company through acquisitions, joint-venture arrangements
and possibly an infusion of new capital. A strategy was developed to
rationalize the portfolio and to concentrate on one asset class. It is also
expected that over time the Trust's holdings will favor equity positions rather
than mortgages. The Board explored growth opportunities in single and
multi-tenant industrial buildings, retail centers and hotel properties. Early
research indicated potential growth opportunities for CalREIT within the
lodging industry where the economics appear to be firming. In the coming
months, management intends to continue to explore multiple options to expand
the Trust, but will focus on growth potential within the lodging industry.
3
<PAGE> 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table sets forth certain information relating to properties owned
by the Trust at December 31, 1994. All of the properties are suitable for the
purpose for which they are designed and are being used.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date of Ownership Square Total
Direct Equity Investments Acquisition Percentage Feet Cost (1) Encumbrances
------------------------------------------------- ----------- ---------- ------- --------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OFFICE BUILDINGS:
Redfield Commerce Center, Scottsdale, Arizona 5/88 100% 27,900 $ 1,581,000 -
--------------- ---------
Total office buildings 1,581,000 0
--------------- ---------
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:
Fulton Square, Sacramento, California 5/91 100% 35,493 3,613,000 340,000
Totem Square, Kirkland, Washington 11/90 60% 126,623 9,092,000 4,365,000
515 S. Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, California 7/88 100% 83,000 5,745,000 -
--------------- ---------
Total commercial buildings 18,450,000 4,705,000
--------------- ---------
HOTELS:
Casa Grande Motor Inn, Arroyo Grande, California 9/92 100% 64,200 6,452,000 3,100,000
--------------- ---------
Total hotels 6,452,000 3,100,000
--------------- ---------
$ 26,483,000 7,805,000
=============== =========
</TABLE>
(1) Total cost before any reduction for valuation allowance related to
investments and accumulated depreciation.
4
<PAGE> 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of 1994.
5
<PAGE> 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART II
==============================================================================
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Security Holder Matters
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CalREIT's Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the
Pacific Stock Exchange ("PSE"). The trading symbol for CalREIT's Common Shares
is "CT". The Trust had 1,767 shareholders of record at March 3, 1995.
The following tables set forth the high and low sales prices of CalREIT shares
on the NYSE during the last two years. Distributions per share during this time
period also are set forth.
MARKET PRICE AND DISTRIBUTION DECLARED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarter Ended
-------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
3/31/94 6/30/94 9/30/94 12/31/94
High 2-1/8 2-1/8 2-1/8 2
Low 2-1/8 2 1-5/8 1-5/8
Distributions $ - 0.05 0.05 -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
3/31/93 6/30/93 9/30/93 12/31/93
High $ 3 2-3/4 2-5/8 2-5/8
Low 2 2-1/8 2-1/8 2-1/8
Distributions $ .05 0.18 - -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
6
<PAGE> 10
The following table sets forth the character for tax purposes of CalREIT's
distributions per common share during the last five fiscal years.
CHARACTER OF DISTRIBUTIONS
FOR TAX PURPOSES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For Tax Purposes
Characterized as
----------------
Total ---------------------------------------------
Years Ended Per Share Ordinary Capital Return of
December 31 Distributions Income Gains Capital
----------- ------------- ------ ----- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1990 $ .40 $ .02 $ .03 $ .35
1991 $ .25 $ .25 - -
1992 $ .20 - - $ .20
1993 $ .23 - - $ .23
1994 $ .10 - - $ .10
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE> 11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following represents selected financial data for California Real Estate
Investment Trust for the years ended December 31, 1994, 1993, 1992, 1991 and
1990. The data should be read in conjunction with other financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere herein.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating results:
Revenue $ 4,898 $ 5,453 $ 5,889 $ 7,182 $ 7,543
Net (loss) income (1) (36) (8,111) (10,279) (3,571) 2,955
Per Share of Beneficial Interest:
Net (loss) income $ (0.00) $ (.89) $ (1.13) $ (.39) $ .33
Distributions 0.10 $ .23 $ .20 $ .25 $ .40
Financial Position:
Total assets $ 36,540 $ 42,194 $ 55,477 $ 66,159 $ 70,188
Long-term obligations 8,740 13,360 15,682 14,650 12,651
</TABLE>
(1) Includes valuation losses of $119; $8,146; $11,609; $5,483 and $0 for 1994,
1993, 1992, 1991 and 1990, respectively. See Note 5 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERVIEW
In 1994 there were significant changes within California Real Estate Investment
Trust. Commonwealth Equity Trust (now The Peregrine Real Estate Trust), as the
majority shareholder holding a 76% interest in the Trust, voted its shares on
April 14, 1994 to remove and replace the Board of Trustees and its management
group. Peregrine believed the Trust was being operated in a liquidation mode as
opposed to that of a going concern and that overall returns from rapid property
dispositions may have been lower than those achievable over a longer holding
period. Peregrine believed it had to move to protect its and other
stockholders' investments in the company. Shortly after taking over management
of CalREIT, the new Board installed its own management group and terminated the
contracts of B & B Property Investment, Development and Management Company (B &
B), and B & B Property Investment, Inc. (B & B
8
<PAGE> 12
Property). In May 1994, CalREIT terminated its hotel management agreement with
North Main Street Company (North Main), also owned by B&B's former President
and Chairman of the Board.
Frank A. Morrow assumed the responsibility of Chairman of the Board of Trustees
and Chief Executive Officer immediately, and subsequently, Arnold E. Brown
became Chief Financial Officer and a Trustee. An immediate and comprehensive
review revealed the Trust was basically a small company with six properties of
widely varied types scattered throughout three Western states. In addition, the
Trust was found to hold a small loan portfolio of eight mortgage notes which
had come about primarily from disposition transactions occurring prior to 1994.
At the time the new management group took over in the second quarter of 1994,
CalREIT had approximately $3,300,000 in cash. A portion of this cash was used
to bring the Trust's properties up to good operating condition, to remedy a
sizable number of maintenance items and improvements which had been deferred.
Delinquent rents were collected and non-paying tenants evicted from the Trust's
commercial properties. A leasing program was implemented to improve occupancy
levels and to develop a higher caliber tenant mix. Foreclosure proceedings were
initiated on two noteholders delinquent in their payments. One of the Trust's
properties, a small shopping center in Imperial Canyon, California was sold.
Total distributions of $914,000, or $.10 per share, were paid during the second
and third quarters. No distributions were paid in the fourth quarter as
management concentrated on developing its short and long-term operating plans
and associated cash requirements.
For comparison purposes, it should be noted that the CalREIT property portfolio
underwent a significant reduction in size between 1993 and 1994. At the
beginning of 1993, CalREIT owned thirteen properties; however by the end of the
year, with seven properties sold, the Trust owned a total of six properties. As
of the end of May 1994, after the sale of the shopping center noted above,
CalREIT owned four commercial properties, one hotel property and a portfolio of
eight mortgage notes.
CalREIT's commercial property portfolio includes the 27,900 square foot
Redfield Commerce Center in Scottsdale, Arizona; the 35,500 square foot Fulton
Square Shopping Center in Sacramento; an 83,000 square foot Bekins storage
facility in Pasadena and the 126,600 square foot Totem Square retail/office
property in the Seattle metropolitan area. The average occupancy level for the
commercial properties in the portfolio at the end of 1994 was 85%, trending
upward in the first quarter of 1995.
CalREIT owns the 113-room Best Western Casa Grande Motor Inn located near San
Luis Obispo. Until May 14, 1994, this property was managed by North Main.
Commencing June 1, 1994, the hotel was leased to CapStar, a professional hotel
management company, at a base net lease rate of $20,000 per month plus a
percentage of profits above levels as specified in the related lease agreement.
Accordingly, all of the hotel's operations accounted for in the Trust's 1994
financial statements are for five months only, through the end of May 1994.
Thereafter, only the net lease payments are reflected.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At December 31, 1994, the Trust had $3,366,000 in cash. Its five properties had
a net book value of approximately $18,391,000 at year-end 1994 with
collateralized indebtedness against them totaling $8,740,000 (48%). CalREIT's
$20,714,000 note portfolio is carried at a book value of $13,532,000 due
primarily to cumulative write downs in valuation. The primary sources of
9
<PAGE> 13
liquidity for the Trust in 1995 will be its cash on hand, cash generated from
operations and interest payments on its notes. The primary demands on the
Trust's capital resources will be debt service payments and the funding of
capital improvements to the Trust's properties. In addition, in order to
maintain its REIT status, the Trust must distribute to shareholders
approximately $1,000,000 in 1995 and intends to do so in the late third or
early fourth quarter.
The Trust's debt-to-equity ratio improved to 1:3 at the end of 1994 as compared
to 1:2 at year-end 1993. This was primarily a result of the reduction in debt
obligations after the disposition of eight properties. The Trust's current
ratio (cash, accounts receivable in the next 12 months and prepaid expenses;
divided by distributions payable, accounts payable and other liabilities due
within the next 12 months) of 3:1 is indicative of the Trust's financial
stability at this time.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF 1994 TO 1993
Total Revenues decreased by $555,000, or 10%, to $4,898,000 in 1994, down from
$5,453,000 in 1993. This decline is primarily the result of the reduction of
the number of properties by eight, contributing to the overall revenue pool.
Rental revenues decreased by $908,000, or 26%, to $2,593,000 in 1994 compared
to revenues of $3,501,000 in 1993. As stated above, virtually all of the
decline is attributable to the absence of rents from eight properties that were
sold during 1993 and the first part of 1994. Rental revenues from the four
remaining commercial properties, increased by 9% or $190,000 from 1993 to 1994.
The largest increase, $170,000, was attributable to new property management
services and leasing programs implemented at Totem Square.
In 1994, interest revenue to the Trust increased by $777,000, or 87%, to
$1,675,000, up from $898,000 in 1993. This increase was due primarily to the
recognition of an additional $735,000 in interest income on one of the Trust's
mortgage notes. In September of 1994, this note was modified and $491,000 of
accrued interest, (the recognition of which had been deferred), was paid in
consideration for releasing an asset from the pool collateralizing the note.
Revenue from hotel operations during 1994 was $630,000, including $140,000 in
lease revenue from CapStar. CapStar has asked to renegotiate certain lease
terms. It has said it must improve the property's earning capacity. It has
taken a number of steps to accomplish this including increasing the number of
advance group and tour bookings, implementing a local marketing program and
substantially revamping the property's food and beverage operations.
Total Expenses decreased by $1,196,000, or 21%, to $4,597,000 in 1994 down from
$5,793,000 in 1993. This improvement is due primarily to the reduction of
operating expenses, property management fees, depreciation and amortization
expense, and interest expenses required by the Trust's 1994 downsized portfolio
of four commercial properties and one hotel. Specifically, from 1993 to 1994,
the eight properties sold during this time period accounted for a decrease of
$431,000 in commercial property operating expenses; $60,000 of the decrease in
property management expenses; $274,000 of the decrease in depreciation and
amortization expense; and $447,000 of the decrease in interest expense.
10
<PAGE> 14
The Trust's four commercial properties experienced a $161,000 or 22% increase
in property operating expenses from 1993 to 1994 primarily due to deferred
maintenance costs. In contrast, these four properties experienced a $20,000 or
21% decrease in property management expenses during the same time period,
primarily due to a reduction in monthly management fees from 5% to 3% of
collected rents which the Trust negotiated with its new property management
firm. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for these four properties
by $13,000, or 3%, from 1993 to 1994; as did interest expense which decreased
by $31,000 or 5%.
For the first five months of 1994, while the hotel was managed by North Main,
hotel operating expenses decreased by $14,000, or 2%, to $882,000 down from
$896,000 for all of 1993. Hotel property management expenses decreased $25,000,
or 83%, to $5,000 also during the first five months of 1994, down from $30,000
in 1993. Annual hotel depreciation and amortization expenses increased by
$35,000, or 35%, to $136,000 from 1993 to 1994; while the annual hotel interest
expense increased by $35,000, or 11%, to $356,000 from 1993 to 1994.
General and administrative costs increased $151,000, or 23%, from $662,000 in
1993 to $813,000 in 1994. This increase was due primarily to legal fees
incurred in the election of a new Board of Trustees and to the terminations of
B&B, B&B Property and North Main.
Net loss decreased by $8,075,000 in 1994 to $36,000, down from $8,111,000 in
1993. This decrease was due primarily to a substantial difference in valuation
losses charged in 1993 as compared to those charged in 1994.
Operating income in 1994 was $301,000 as compared to a loss of $340,000 in
1993. Early in 1994, the Imperial Canyon shopping center was sold at a gain to
the Trust of $114,000. Recognition of deferred gain from a partial principal
payment on one of the Trust's mortgage notes resulted in an additional $12,000
gain to the Trust in 1994. The total gain of $126,000 was offset by a $344,000
loss from the release of and default on two of the Trust's mortgage notes,
resulting in a total loss on the sale of assets of $218,000 for 1994. In 1993,
the Trust experienced a net gain of $131,000 on the sale of three assets and
the recognition of a deferred gain from a partial principal payment on one of
its mortgage notes.
Income before valuation losses or extraordinary items was $83,000 in 1994 as
compared to a loss of $209,000 in 1993. In 1994, valuation losses of $119,000
resulted from the write down of value on two properties. In 1993, the write
down of value on five properties and four mortgage notes resulted in a total
valuation loss of $8,146,000 for the year. In 1994 there were no extraordinary
items. During 1993, the Trust owned a property with a carrying value of
$2,056,000 which was foreclosed upon by its lender who held a note for
$2,300,000. As a result of this transaction, the Trust recognized a $244,000
gain on the foreclosure as an extraordinary item.
During the first five months of 1994, the hotel experienced an average
operating loss after debt service of $107,000 per month. With the signing of
the lease with CapStar, this amount was reduced to approximately $8,600 per
month, the difference between the monthly lease payment of $20,000 and the
property's monthly debt service requirement of $28,600. CapStar's operating
performance is being monitored closely and if significant improvement to the
bottom-line is not forthcoming in the near future, the Trust must make a
decision as to the viability of this management company or possibly whether to
hold this hotel property over the long-term.
11
<PAGE> 15
COMPARISON OF 1993 TO 1992
Total Revenues decreased by $436,000, or 7%, to $4,453,000 in 1993 from
$5,889,000 in 1992. This decline is primarily the result of the collection of
eight notes receivable during 1993 and the retirement of a note receivable due
to the foreclosure in connection with the acquisition of the hotel which caused
a revenue decrease of $1,350,000, and the acquisition of the hotel property
which caused an increase in revenue of $1,054,000.
Rental revenues declined $140,000, or 4%, to $3,501,000 in 1993 from $3,641,000
in 1992. This decrease represents the effect of the sale of seven properties
during the year combined with increased revenue from properties which were owned
for the entire year.
Interest revenue, as described above, decreased by $1,350,000, or 60%, to
$898,000 in 1993 from $2,248,000 in 1992.
Total Expenses increased by $727,000, or 14%, to $5,793,000 in 1993 from
$5,066,000 in 1992. Hotel operating expenses which were not present in 1992
accounted for $896,000 of expenses. Property management fees increased by
$236,000, or 61%, to $620,000 in 1993 from $384,000 in 1992. However, included
in this amount was a portfolio asset management fee of $165,000 paid to B&B in
1993, a substantial portion of which had been waived in 1992. Other property
related expenses decreased from 1992 to 1993 due to property sales described
above. Operating expenses decreased by $422,000, or 25%, to $1,281,000 in 1993
from $1,703,000 in 1992. Depreciation and amortization decreased by $264,000, or
(24%), to $847,000 in 1993 from $1,111,000 in 1992.
Interest expense increased by $99,000, or 7%, to $1,487,000 in 1993 from
$1,388,000 in 1992. This increase arose primarily from the Trust's new note
payable related to the hotel.
General and administrative expenses increased $182,000, or 38%, to $662,000 in
1993 from $480,000 in 1992. Of this increase, $176,000, or 97%, was attributable
to non-recurring expenses in connection with a proposed merger that was
ultimately abandoned.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Changing interest rates would not have a significant effect on the Trust's
current debt, as it is all at fixed rates. However, should the Trust desire to
increase its debt level or to raise equity in the future, an increase in
interest rates would make either debt or equity more costly.
12
<PAGE> 16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Page
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Accountants 14 - 16
Consolidated Balance Sheets 17
Consolidated Statements of Operations 18
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity 19
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 20
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 21 - 33
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation 40 - 42
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate 43 - 44
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE> 17
[COOPERS & LYBRAND
LETTERHEAD]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Trustees
California Real Estate Investment Trust
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of California Real
Estate Investment Trust and Subsidiary (Trust) as of December 31, 1994, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended. In connection with our audit of the
consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement
schedules as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the
Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
California Real Estate Investment Trust and Subsidiary at December 31, 1994,
and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Sacramento, California
March 3, 1995
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., a registered limited liability partnership, is a
member firm of Coopers & Lybrand (International).
14
<PAGE> 18
[BURNETT UMPHRESS+KILGOUR LETTERHEAD]
Independent Auditors' Report
The Board of Directors
California Real Estate Investment Trust
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of California Real
Estate Investment Trust and subsidiary (the Trust) as of December 31, 1993, and
the related consolidated statements of (loss) income, changes in shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended. In connection with our audit of
the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial
statement schedules as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility
of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of California Real
Estate Trust and subsidiary at December 31, 1993, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related
statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
Burnett, Umphress & Kilgour
Rancho Cordova, California
March 11, 1994
15
<PAGE> 19
[KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP LETTERHEAD]
Independent Auditors' Report
The Board of Directors
California Real Estate Investment Trust:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of loss, changes in
shareholders' equity, and cash flows of California Real Estate Investment Trust
and subsidiary (the Trust) for the year ended December 31, 1992. In connection
with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited
the financial statement schedules for the year ended December 31, 1992. These
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and the cash flows
of California Real Estate Investment Trust and subsidiary for the year ended
December 31, 1992 inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered
in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
February 12, 1993
16
<PAGE> 20
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 1994 and 1993
----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Investments:
Rental properties, less accumulated depreciation of $2,229,000
and $2,520,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively, and valuation
allowance of $5,863,000 and $8,674,000 in 1994 and 1993
respectively $ 18,391,000 $ 23,267,000
Notes receivable, net of valuation allowances and
deferred gains of $7,182,000 and $7,442,000 in
1994 and 1993, respectively 13,532,000 14,036,000
------------ ------------
31,923,000 37,303,000
Cash 3,366,000 3,451,000
Receivables, net of allowance of $323,000 and $233,000
in 1994 and 1993, respectively 974,000 1,081,000
Other assets, net of valuation allowance of $310,000 and
$260,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively 277,000 359,000
------------ ------------
Total Assets $ 36,540,000 $ 42,194,000
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Long-term notes payable, collateralized by deeds of trust
on rental properties $ 8,740,000 $ 13,360,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 43,000 88,000
Other liabilities 72,000 135,000
------------ ------------
Total Liabilities 8,855,000 13,583,000
------------ ------------
Shareholders' Equity:
Shares of beneficial interest, par value $1 a share;
unlimited authorization, 9,157,000 and 9,145,000 shares
outstanding in 1994 and 1993, respectively 9,157,000 9,145,000
Additional paid-in capital 55,098,000 55,086,000
Accumulated deficit (36,570,000) (35,620,000)
------------ ------------
Total Shareholders' Equity 27,685,000 28,611,000
------------ ------------
Commitments (Note 10)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $ 36,540,000 $ 42,194,000
============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
17
<PAGE> 21
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992
----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Rent $ 2,593,000 $ 3,501,000 $ 3,641,000
Interest 1,675,000 898,000 2,248,000
Hotel 630,000 1,054,000 -
-------------- -------------- ------------
4,898,000 5,453,000 5,889,000
-------------- -------------- ------------
Expenses:
Operating expenses 1,011,000 1,281,000 1,703,000
Hotel operating expenses 882,000 896,000 -
Property management 252,000 620,000 384,000
Depreciation and amortization 595,000 847,000 1,111,000
Interest 1,044,000 1,487,000 1,388,000
General and administrative 813,000 662,000 480,000
-------------- -------------- ------------
4,597,000 5,793,000 5,066,000
-------------- -------------- ------------
Income (loss) before (loss) gain on foreclosure or
sale of investments, valuation losses, extraordinary
item and minority interest 301,000 (340,000) 823,000
Net (loss) gain on foreclosure or sale of
investments (218,000) 131,000 88,000
-------------- -------------- ------------
Income (loss) before valuation losses,
extraordinary item and minority interest 83,000 (209,000) 911,000
Valuation losses 119,000 8,146,000 11,609,000
-------------- -------------- ------------
Loss before extraordinary
item and minority interest (36,000) (8,355,000) (10,698,000)
Extraordinary item - 244,000 -
--------------- -------------- ------------
Loss before minority interest (36,000) (8,111,000) (10,698,000)
Minority interest - - 419,000
--------------- --------------- ------------
Net loss $ (36,000) $ (8,111,000) $(10,279,000)
=============== =============== ============
Net loss per share of beneficial interest $ (0.00) $ (0.89) $ (1.13)
=============== =============== ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
18
<PAGE> 22
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992
----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares of Additional Total
Beneficial Interest Paid-in Accumulated Shareholders'
Number Amount Capital Deficit Equity
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1991 9,111,000 $ 9,111,000 $ 55,046,000 $ (13,352,000) $ 50,805,000
Net loss - - - (10,279,000) (10,279,000)
Proceeds from shares issued 17,000 17,000 18,000 - 35,000
Distributions - - - (1,823,000) (1,823,000)
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance at December 31, 1992 9,128,000 9,128,000 55,064,000 (25,454,000) 38,738,000
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss - - - (8,111,000) (8,111,000)
Proceeds from shares issued 17,000 17,000 22,000 - 39,000
Distributions - - - (2,055,000) (2,055,000)
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------
Balance at December 31, 1993 9,145,000 9,145,000 55,086,000 (35,620,000) 28,611,000
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------
Net loss - - - (36,000) (36,000)
Proceeds from shares issued 12,000 12,000 12,000 - 24,000
Distributions - - - (914,000) (914,000)
--------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------
Balance at December 31, 1994 9,157,000 $ 9,157,000 $ 55,098,000 $ (36,570,000) $ 27,685,000
========= =========== ============ ============= ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
19
<PAGE> 23
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992
----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (36,000) $ (8,111,000) $ (10,279,000)
------------ ------------ -------------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 595,000 847,000 1,111,000
(Gain) loss on foreclosure or sale of
investments 218,000 (375,000) (88,000)
Minority interest in net loss -- -- (419,000)
Valuation losses 119,000 8,146,000 11,609,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in receivables 107,000 386,000 (214,000)
Decrease (increase) in other assets 82,000 155,000 (180,000)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable
and accrued expenses (45,000) (609,000) 54,000
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities (106,000) (225,000) 91,000
------------ ------------ --------------
Total adjustments to net loss 970,000 8,325,000 11,964,000
------------ ------------ --------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 934,000 214,000 1,685,000
------------ ------------ --------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Loans made to The Peregrine Real Estate Trust -- - (12,000)
Payments related to sales of rental properties (100,000) - -
Proceeds from sale of rental properties -- 848,000 -
Improvements to rental properties (106,000) (1,510,000) (109,000)
Collections on notes receivable 346,000 5,575,000 93,000
Increase in notes receivable (175,000) - -
------------ ------------ --------------
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities (35,000) 4,913,000 (28,000)
------------ ------------ --------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on long-term notes payable (94,000) (91,000) (119,000)
Distributions paid (890,000) (2,016,000) (1,788,000)
------------ ------------ --------------
Net cash used by financing activities (984,000) (2,107,000) (1,907,000)
------------ ------------ --------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash (85,000) 3,020,000 (250,000)
Cash, beginning of year 3,451,000 431,000 681,000
------------ ------------ --------------
Cash, end of year $ 3,366,000 $ 3,451,000 $ 431,000
============ ============ ==============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
20
<PAGE> 24
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
ORGANIZATION
California Real Estate Investment Trust was organized under the laws
of the State of California pursuant to a Declaration of Trust dated
September 15, 1966.
The Trust became a partner of Totem Square, L. P. (Totem), a Washington
Limited Partnership in which the Trust owns a 59% interest, on November
30, 1990. The Trust also formed CalREIT Totem Square, Inc. (Cal-CORP)
to act as general partner of Totem. Cal-CORP has a 1% interest in
Totem, and Totem Square Associates, an unrelated party, has the
remaining 40%.
On April 14, 1994, The Peregrine Real Estate Trust (formerly
Commonwealth Equity Trust) as majority shareholder owning 76% of the
Trust's outstanding Common Shares, called a special meeting of
shareholders at which it voted its common stock to replace the Board of
Trustees. At that time, the Trust elected a new Board of Trustees all
of whom were key management personnel of The Peregrine Real Estate
Trust ("Peregrine"). Subsequently, the Board was changed and is now
comprised of one outside Trustee who also serves on Peregrine's Board
of Trustees, and two remaining Trustees, both of whom are executive
officers of Peregrine and one of whom is also a Trustee of Peregrine.
In order that the majority of its Trustees be independent, at its next
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Trust will add to its slate two
additional candidates to serve as outside Trustees.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
For 1994, 1993 and 1992, the consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Trust and Totem.
RENTAL PROPERTIES
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, rental properties are carried at cost,
net of accumulated depreciation and less a valuation allowance for
possible investment losses. The Trust's valuation allowance for
possible investment losses represents the excess of the carrying value
of individual properties over their appraised or estimated net
realizable value.
21
<PAGE> 25
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
The additions to the valuation allowance for possible investment losses
are recorded after consideration of various external factors,
particularly overbuilding in real estate markets which has a negative
impact on achievable rental rates. A gain or loss will be recorded to
the extent that the amounts ultimately realized from property sales
differ from those currently estimated. In the event economic conditions
for real estate continue to decline, additional valuation losses may be
recognized.
The allowance for depreciation and amortization has been calculated
under the straight-line method, based upon the estimated useful lives
of the properties which lives range from 30 to 40 years. Expenditures
for maintenance, repairs and improvements which do not materially
prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as
incurred.
Real estate acquired by cancellation of indebtedness or foreclosure is
recorded at fair market value at the date of acquisition but not in
excess of the unpaid balance of the related loan plus costs of securing
title to and possession of the property.
OTHER ASSETS
The Trust amortizes leasing commissions on a straight-line basis over
the lives of the leases to which they relate. Financing costs are
amortized over the lives of the loans or other financial instruments to
which they relate.
INCOME TAXES
The Trust has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust and
as such, is not taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is
distributed to shareholders, provided that at least 95% of its real
estate trust taxable income is distributed and that the Trust meets
certain other REIT requirements.
CASH
The Trust invests its cash and restricted cash in demand deposits with
banks with strong credit ratings. Bank balances in excess of federally
insured amounts totaled $4,299,000 and $3,146,000 as of December 31,
1994 and 1993, respectively. The Trust has not experienced any losses
on these deposits.
22
<PAGE> 26
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
SALES OF REAL ESTATE
The Trust complies with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 66 (SFAS 66), "Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate." Accordingly, the recognition of gains on certain transactions
are deferred until such transactions have complied with the criteria
for full profit recognition under the Statement. The Trust had deferred
gains of $1,169,000 and $1,181,000 at December 31, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In 1994, the Trust adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 107 (SFAS 107), "Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments." This statement requires disclosure of the fair value of
all financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and
not recognized in the balance sheet. The adoption of SFAS 107 resulted
only in additional disclosure requirements and had no effect on the
Trust's financial position or results of operations.
INCOME RECOGNITION
In 1994, the Trust adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 118 (SFAS 118), "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan -
Income Recognition and Disclosures." This statement requires disclosure
of the method of recognizing interest on impaired loans. The adoption
of SFAS 118 resulted only in additional disclosure requirements and had
no effect on the Trust's financial position or results of operations.
The Trust recognizes interest income on notes receivable when it is
estimated that the fair value of the collateral related to the note is
adequate.
NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share of beneficial interest is based upon the
weighted-average number of shares of beneficial interest outstanding.
Shares of beneficial interest equivalents were anti-dilutive for the
three years ended December 31, 1994. The weighted average number of
shares of beneficial interest and earnings per share of beneficial
interest are as follows:
23
<PAGE> 27
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average shares of
beneficial interest 9,150,596 9,138,480 9,117,797
--------- --------- ---------
Loss per share of beneficial interest
before extraordinary item $ (0.00) $ (.92) $ (1.13)
Extraordinary item -- .03 --
------------ ----------- -----------
Total $ (0.00) (.89) (1.13)
============ =========== ===========
</TABLE>
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made in the presentation of the
1993 financial statements to conform to the 1994 presentation.
2. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Until April 14, 1994, administrative services were provided to the
Trust by B & B Property Investment, Development and Management Company,
Inc. (B & B). B & B's compensation consisted of an advisory fee based
on the real estate investments and real estate commissions in
connection with purchases, sales and leasing of Trust properties as
well as a reimbursement of certain expenses incurred in performing
services for the Trust.
Until April 14, 1994, property management responsibilities of the Trust
were assigned to B & B Property Investment, Inc. (B & B Property). The
compensation for property management services was computed at 5% of the
gross receipts of each property managed and each note receivable
serviced.
Compensation to B & B and B & B Property was $156,000, $1,042,000 and
$474,000 during 1994, 1993 and 1992, respectively. Certain disputes
between the Trust, B & B and B & B Property arising from the Trust's
termination of B & B's and B & B Property's advisory and management
agreements were settled in May 1994 for $60,000.
24
<PAGE> 28
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
2. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS, CONTINUED:
The Trust entered into a management agreement with North Main Street
Company (North Main), a company owned by the President and Chairman of
the Board of the Trust's former advisor, B & B, to manage the Trust's
hotel. Pursuant to that agreement, the Trust incurred management fees
of $16,000 and $34,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively. The Trust also
terminated that agreement with North Main and leased the hotel property
to an unrelated third party, a professional hotel management company
which operates lodging facilities nationally.
The Trust and Peregrine are both self-administered. However, they share
certain costs, including personnel costs for which the Trust reimburses
Peregrine pursuant to a cost allocation agreement based on each trust's
respective asset values (real property and notes receivable) that is
negotiated annually. During 1994, reimbursable costs charged to the
Trust by Peregrine approximated $300,000. This amount was offset
against the following amounts due from Peregrine.
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, the Trust had amounts due from Peregrine
aggregating $202,000 and $437,000, net of valuation allowances of
$141,000 and $200,000, respectively. Such uncollateralized amounts are
due on demand; and the remaining $298,000 due from Peregrine to the
Trust will be satisfied against future cost allocations.
3. RENTAL PROPERTIES:
At December 31, 1994 and 1993, the Trust's rental property portfolio at
cost included commercial buildings, $18,450,000 and $26,505,000; office
buildings, $1,581,000 and $1,581,000; and hotel property, $6,452,000
and $6,375,000, respectively.
Noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 1994, provide for
minimum rental income during each of the next five years of $1,449,000,
$1,215,000, $945,000, $425,000 and $312,000, respectively, and $274,000
thereafter. Certain of the leases increase periodically based on
changes in the Consumer Price Index.
One rental property with a carrying value of $3,372,000 at December 31,
1994 is subject to a purchase option exercisable in 1996 on the part of
the lessee. Exercise price as determined by the related agreement is
greater than the carrying value of the property as of December 31,
1994.
25
<PAGE> 29
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
4. NOTES RECEIVABLE:
In order to facilitate sales of real estate, the Trust has accepted
partial payment in the form of notes receivable collateralized by deeds
of trust. Additionally, the Trust has invested in a variety of loans
collateralized by deeds of trust. As of December 31, 1994 and 1993, the
Trust had long-term notes receivable, collateralized by deeds of trust,
of (before valuation allowances and deferred gains) $20,714,000 and
$21,478,000, respectively. Generally the notes are collateralized by
real estate properties in California and Arizona.
The notes are to be repaid from the cash flow of the property or
proceeds from the sale or refinancing of the properties. At December
31, 1994, $2,282,000 of such notes were delinquent. Contractually
scheduled principal collections over the next five years, excluding
delinquent notes, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1995 $ 198,000
1996 25,000
1997 888,000
1998 794,000
1999 34,000
Thereafter 16,493,000
------------
$ 18,432,000
============
</TABLE>
The notes bear interest at rates ranging from 7.63% to 16% as of
December 31, 1994. For the year ended December 31, 1994, the overall
effective rate was approximately 8%.
5. VALUATION ALLOWANCES:
Based on a review of its investments, the Trust has provided for
valuation allowances as set forth below. Adverse economic factors,
particularly overbuilt real estate markets which caused a decline in
lease renewal rates, were the primary causes of these valuation losses.
If such adverse economic factors continue, additional valuation loss
provisions may be required.
Analysis of changes in the allowance for possible losses on real estate
investments, partnership interests, notes receivable, and rents and
interest receivable for 1994, 1993 and 1992 follow:
26
<PAGE> 30
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
5. Valuation Allowances, continued:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental Properties
Allowance for valuation losses on rental property
investments:
Beginning balance $ 8,674,000 $ 11,274,000 $ 7,863,000
Provision for valuation losses 69,000 4,330,000 5,731,000
Amounts charged against allowance
for valuation losses (2,880,000) (6,930,000) (2,320,000)
---------- ---------- -----------
Ending balance $ 5,863,000 $ 8,674,000 $ 11,274,000
========= ========= ==========
Notes Receivable
Allowance for valuation losses and deferred gains on
notes receivable:
Beginning balance $ 7,442,000 $ 4,377,000 $ --
Provision for valuation losses -- 2,859,000 5,878,000
Deferred gains on notes and other, net (12,000) 1,181,000 --
Amounts charged against allowance
for valuation losses (248,000) (975,000) (1,501,000)
---------- ---------- ----------
Ending balance $ 7,182,000 $ 7,442,000 $ 4,377,000
========= ========= ==========
Rents and Interest Receivable
Allowance for bad debt losses on rents and
interest receivable:
Beginning balance $ 233,000 $ 349,000 $ 312,000
Provision for losses 183,000 233,000 37,000
Amounts charged against allowance
for losses (93,000) (349,000) --
------------- ------------ -----------
Ending balance $ 323,000 $ 233,000 $ 349,000
============ ============= ===========
</TABLE>
In addition, the Trust has established an allowance for valuation
losses on other assets in the amount of $310,000 at December 31, 1994,
$260,000 at December 31, 1993 and $0 at December 31, 1992.
27
<PAGE> 31
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
6. LONG-TERM NOTES PAYABLE:
As of December 31, 1994 and 1993, the Trust had long-term notes payable
(Notes) of $8,740,000 and $13,360,000 respectively, most of which were
collateralized by deeds of trust on rental properties with an aggregate
net book value of $14,321,000 and $18,224,000 at December 31, 1994 and
1993, respectively. These notes are due in installments extending to
the year 2017 with interest rates ranging from 8% to 10.75%.
Contractually scheduled principal payments during each of the next five
years are $416,000, $4,348,000, $59,000, $3,076,000 and $43,000,
respectively, and $798,000 thereafter.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS:
Cash distributions were made per share of beneficial interest for the
past three years and were classified for Federal income tax purposes as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Ordinary income ---% ---% ---%
Capital gains income ---% ---% ---%
Return of capital 100% 100% 100%
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
Total distributions per share $0.10 $0.23 $0.20
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
8. STOCK OPTION PLAN:
At December 31, 1994, the Trust had no existing stock option plans.
During 1993, options on 53,100 shares in one then existing stock option
plan and 208,470 shares in another expired unexercised.
28
<PAGE> 32
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
9. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
In connection with the purchase of property and improvements, the Trust
entered into various noncash transactions as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Property cost $ -- $ -- $ 11,531,000
Other additions 106,000 1,510,000 63,000
---------- ----------- -------------
Total additions 106,000 1,510,000 11,594,000
Debt incurred by the Trust -- -- (3,060,000)
Notes receivable applied
to purchase -- -- (8,827,000)
Valuation loss on in-substance
foreclosures -- -- 1,164,000
Other assets applied to purchase -- -- (695,000)
Lease deposits -- -- (67,000)
---------- ----------- -------------
Cash used $ 106,000 $ 1,510,000 $ 109,000
========== =========== =============
</TABLE>
Included in the purchase of property for 1992 is property acquired
through in-substance foreclosure at a cost of $5,200,000. In connection
with the in-substance foreclosure, a note receivable for $2,940,000 was
applied and $3,060,000 in debt was incurred.
In connection with the sale of property, the Trust entered into various
noncash transactions as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales price $ 4,423,000 $ 12,515,000 $ 1,600,000
Notes receivable -- (9,367,000) --
Notes payable assumed by buyer and
other liabilities applied to sales
price (4,523,000) (2,300,000) (1,600,000)
----------- ------------ -----------
Cash (paid) received $ (100,000) $ 848,000 $ --
=========== ============ ===========
Cost of property sold $ 8,084,000 $ 21,631,000 $ --
=========== ============ ===========
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE> 33
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
9. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:
In 1993 and 1992, the Trust allowed foreclosure on notes payable
secured by deeds of trust. The sales prices of $2,300,000 and
$1,600,000 represent the value of the notes payable relieved in
connection with these foreclosures in 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Distributions were made as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total distributions $ 914,000 $ 2,055,000 $ 1,823,000
Distributions reinvested (24,000) (39,000) (35,000)
--------- ----------- -----------
Distributions paid in cash $ 890,000 $ 2,016,000 $ 1,788,000
========= =========== ===========
</TABLE>
In 1993, the Trust modified the terms of its note receivable on
Redfield Commerce Center, 7950 E. Redfield Road in Scottsdale, Arizona.
As a provision of the modification, $48,000 of accrued interest was
added to the principal amount of the note.
On October 23, 1992, the Trust exchanged $5,900,000 of notes receivable
collateralized by real property for a shopping center located in Mesa,
Arizona valued at $6,300,000 and owned by Peregrine. Notes aggregating
$1,084,000 are guaranteed by the Trust. The excess of the property
value over the value of the notes was used to satisfy delinquent
property taxes, unexpended security deposits and interest receivable.
In December 1992, the Trust exercised its right to offset $258,000 of
notes receivable and related accrued interest of $132,000 against notes
and accrued interest payable aggregating $390,000 with the same party.
Interest paid on the Trust's outstanding debt for 1994, 1993, and 1992,
was $1,121,000, $920,000 and $1,365,000 respectively.
10. COMMITMENTS:
LEASES
The Trust is obligated under a land lease to the year 2033. The minimum
annual payment under the lease for each of the next five years is
$69,000, and, in the aggregate, $2,346,000, thereafter. Total ground
lease expense was $75,000, $63,000 and $69,000 for 1994, 1993 and 1992,
respectively.
30
<PAGE> 34
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
11. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
SFAS 107 requires disclosure of fair value information about financial
instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which
it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market
prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using
present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount
rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived
fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to
independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in
immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS 107 excludes certain
financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its
disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts
presented do not represent the underlying value of the Trust.
The estimated fair value of the Trust's financial instruments,
including cash, notes receivable, rents and other receivables and notes
payable, at December 31, 1994, is approximately the same as their
carrying amounts.
12. MINORITY INTEREST:
The Trust has a 60% ownership interest in Totem, its subsidiary.
Totem's net losses have exhausted the minority shareholder's equity
interest. On the consolidated statement of operations, no minority
interest in the subsidiary's net loss is recorded for 1994 or 1993. In
the event that future income is generated from the subsidiary, the
Trust will have first rights to the income to the extent of the
minority shareholder's accumulated deficit in the subsidiary.
13. EXTRAORDINARY ITEM:
During 1993, the Trust owned a rental property with a carrying value of
$2,056,000 that was foreclosed upon by the lender of $2,300,000 of
long-term term debt which the property collateralized. Consequently,
the Trust recognized a $244,000 gain on the foreclosure as an
extraordinary item.
31
<PAGE> 35
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
14. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Quarter Ended
-------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
-------- ------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1994
----
Revenues $ 1,131,000 $ 891,000 $ 1,353,000 $ 1,523,000
Gain (loss) on fore-
closure or sale of
investments, net $ 0 $ 114,000 $ (344,000) $ 12,000
Net income (loss) $ (1,000) $ (328,000) $ 341,000 $ (48,000)(1)
Net income (loss) per share $ (0.00) $ (0.04) $ 0.04 $ (0.00)
1993
----
Revenues $ 1,604,000 $ 1,163,000 $ 1,154,000 $ 1,532,000
Gain (loss) on fore-
closure or sale of
investments, net $ 19,000 $ 244,000 $ 46,000 $ (178,000)
Net income (loss) $ (5,000) $ 480,000 $ 116,000 $ (8,702,000)(2)
Net income (loss) per share $ (0.00) $ 0.05 $ 0.01 $ (0.95)
1992
----
Revenues $ 1,490,000 $ 1,556,000 $ 1,540,000 $ 1,303,000
Gain on fore-
closure or sale of
investments $ 0 $ 0 $ 88,000 $ 0
Net income (loss) $ 358,000 $ 280,000 $ 420,000 $ (11,337,000)(3)
Net income (loss) per share $ 0.04 $ 0.03 $ 0.05 $ (1.25)
</TABLE>
(1) Includes $119,000 in valuation losses.
(2) Includes $8,146,000 in valuation losses.
(3) Includes $11,609,000 in valuation losses.
32
<PAGE> 36
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
----------
15. HISTORICAL FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AND FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION:
Equity REIT analysts generally consider Funds From Operations (FFO) an
appropriate measure of performance in comparing the results of
operations of REITs. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts as net income computed in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles before gains and losses on
sales of property and from debt restructuring plus depreciation and
amortization. Funds Available for Distribution ("FAD") is defined as
FFO less capital expenditures funded by operations and loan
amortization. The Trust believes that in order to facilitate a clear
understanding of the historical operating results of the Trust, FFO and
FAD should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) as
presented in this report. FFO and FAD should not be considered as an
alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of the Trust's
performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.
Funds From Operations and Funds Available for Distribution for the
years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 are summarized as follows:
Calculation of Funds From Operations
and Funds Available for Distribution
(Dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) before gain (loss)
on foreclosure or sale of investments, valuation
losses, extraordinary items and minority interest $ 301 $ (340)
Depreciation and amortization 595 847
--------- ----------
Funds From Operations 896 507
Capital Improvements (106) (1,510)
Loan principal payments (94) (91)
--------- ----------
Funds Available for Distribution $ 696 $ --
========= ==========
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 37
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During 1993, the Trust terminated KPMG Peat Marwick as its independent
accountant and appointed Burnett, Umphress & Kilgour. As of December 21, 1994,
Burnett, Umphress & Kilgour was terminated as the Trust's independent
accountant, and Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. ("C & L") was appointed the Trust's
independent accountant. Because the Trust is 76% owned by Peregrine, which is
also currently audited by C & L, cost savings will arise from C & L's auditing
of both trusts. These changes of accountants were appropriately reported by the
Trust on Form 8-K.
During the Trust's two most recent fiscal years and the interim period ending
December 21, 1994, there were no disagreements with either former accountant on
any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. Any disagreement(s), if not resolved
to the satisfaction of either former accountant, would have caused them to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with their
reports.
34
<PAGE> 38
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART III
==============================================================================
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Trustees consists of three persons, all of whose terms commenced
during 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Office
---- --- ------
<S> <C> <C>
Arnold E. Brown 47 Trustee and Chief Financial Officer
John McMahan 57 Trustee
Frank A. Morrow 55 Chairman of the Board of Trustees and CEO
</TABLE>
John McMahan serves as an outside Trustee; he is also Chairman of the Board of
Peregrine. Frank A. Morrow is also a Trustee for Peregrine. Arnold E. Brown also
serves as Chief Financial Officer for Peregrine.
There are no arrangements or understandings between any Trustee and any other
person pursuant to which the Trustee was selected as a Trustee. There are no
family relationships among any of the Trustees. The three Trustees will be
candidates for re-election at the annual meeting of shareholders when their term
expires. In order that the majority of its Trustees be independent, at its next
annual meeting of shareholders, the Trust will add to its slate two additional
candidates to serve as outside Trustees.
The principal occupations and affiliations of the Trustees are as follows:
Frank A. Morrow, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Morrow has been active in the real estate industry for over 25 years. As an
independent advisor and business consultant, he has worked for several real
estate companies as a turnaround specialist and workout expert. Other
assignments have included due diligence investigations, stepping in as senior
management in times of crisis, and multi-site real estate portfolio management.
Mr. Morrow has had considerable experience in the acquisition, financing,
leasing, management and sale of single as well as multiple assets. For a number
of years, he served as the Managing Director of Real Estate for Stanford
University and as Senior Vice President for the Boise Cascade Urban Development
Corporation. Prior to his business career, Mr. Morrow served nine years in the
U.S. Navy as an aviator and test pilot. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy
and in 1971, received an MBA degree from Stanford University. He serves on the
board of directors of Landsing Pacific Fund.
Arnold E. Brown, Chief Financial Officer and Trustee. Mr. Brown has over twenty
years experience in real estate finance and investment. He is a Certified Public
Accountant and previously served as a partner of the international accounting
and consulting firm of Grant Thornton, where he was one of eight members of that
firm's U. S. Real Estate Task Force. Since 1983, Mr. Brown has been in the
private real estate investment and advisory business. Through his company, Brown
Partners Ltd., he has acted as a principal or intermediary in numerous real
estate transactions
35
<PAGE> 39
and has advised real estate investment companies on
financial restructuring and real estate securities valuation matters. Mr. Brown
graduated from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1969 and
received an MBA degree from Stanford University in 1971.
John McMahan, Trustee. Mr. McMahan is President of John McMahan Associates,
Inc., a San Francisco-based real estate consulting firm founded in 1973. Mr.
McMahan has also served as the Chief Executive Officer of Mellon/McMahan Real
Estate Advisors, Inc. which grew into one of the country's largest real estate
investment advisors. He is a faculty member at the Haas Graduate School of
Business at the University of California at Berkeley. Mr. McMahan has published
many articles on real estate investment and has been active in several national
real estate organizations including the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts. Mr. McMahan graduated from the University of Southern
California and received an MBA degree in 1961 from the Harvard Graduate School
of Business. He serves on the boards of BRE Properties, Inc. and Mellon
Participating Mortgage Trust, Inc. as well as the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Managers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 11. Executive Compensation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described in Item 1, the Trust has no employees. Pursuant to a cost
allocation agreement discussed in Item 13, Frank A. Morrow, the Chairman and CEO
of the Trust, indirectly received cash compensation of $64,000 during 1994.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Listed below are those shareholders known to the Trust as of March 1, 1995 to be
the beneficial owner or the member of a group which is the beneficial owner of
more than five percent of the Trust's shares of beneficial interest (9,156,969
total).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Address Amount and Nature Percent
Title of Class of Beneficial Owner of Beneficial Ownership of Class
-------------- ------------------- ----------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Shares of The Peregrine Real Estate Trust
Beneficial Interest 1300 Ethan Way, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825 6,959,593 76.0%
John McMahan, Trustee 5,000
</TABLE>
36
<PAGE> 40
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peregrine owns 76% of the shares of the Trust and Messrs. McMahan, Morrow and
Brown, Chairman and Trustee; President, CEO and Trustee; and Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary, respectively, of Peregrine, are the only Trustees of the
Trust. Both the Trust and Peregrine are self-administered however, they share
certain costs, including personnel costs, for which the Trust reimburses
Peregrine pursuant to a cost allocation agreement based on each trust's
respective asset values (real property and notes receivable).
37
<PAGE> 41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART IV
================================================================================
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(a) (1) Financial Statements Page
------- -------------------- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Included in Part II of this report:
Reports of Independent Accountants 14 - 16
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1994 and 1993 17
Consolidated Statements of Operations, Years Ended December 31, 1994,
1993 and 1992 18
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity,
Years Ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 19
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Years Ended
December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 20
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 21 - 33
(a) (2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits
------- -------------------------------------------------------
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation 40 - 42
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate 43 - 44
The statements and schedules referred to above should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part II
of this Form 10-K. Schedules not included in this section have been omitted
because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in
the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(a) (3) List of Exhibits
----------------
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE> 42
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
(a) (4) REPORT ON FORM 8-K
</TABLE>
The Trust filed one report on Form 8-K during the quarter ended December 31,
1994 as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Financial
Date of Report Items Reported Statements Filed
-------------- -------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
December 21, 1994 Changes in Registrant's No
Certifying Accountant
</TABLE>
39
<PAGE> 43
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTAT INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1994 Page 1 Part A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Column A Column B Column C Column D
----------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Cost Capitalization Subsequent
..Initial Cost to Trust.. ..........to Acquisition..
Buildings,
Improvements
and Personal
Description Encumbrances Land Property Improvements Carrying Cost
----------- ------------ ---- -------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OFFICE BUILDINGS:
Redfield Commerce Center, Scottsdale, Arizona - 580,000 899,000 102,000 None
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total office buildings 0 580,000 899,000 102,000
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:
Fulton Square, Sacramento, California 340,000 Leased 3,536,000 77,000 None
Totem Square, Kirkland, Washington 4,365,000 3,175,000 5,793,000 124,000 None
515 S. Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, California - 1,410,000 4,305,000 30,000 None
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total commercial buildings 4,705,000 4,585,000 13,634,000 231,000
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
HOTELS:
Casa Grande Motor Inn, Aroyo Grande, California 3,100,000 1,289,000 3,911,000 1,252,000 None
---------- --------- --------- ---------
Total hotels 3,100,000 1,289,000 3,911,000 1,252,000
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total Investment in Real Estate $7,805,000 6,454,000 18,444,000 1,585,000
========== ========= ========== =========
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE> 44
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1994 Page 1 Part B
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Column A Column E Column F Column G
------------------------------------------------ -------- --------
Gross Amount at Which
.........Carried at Close of Period.............
Valuation
Buildings and Write Accumulated Date of
Description Land Improvements Down (2) Total (1) Depreciation Construction
----------- ---- ------------ -------- --------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OFFICE BUILDINGS:
Redfield Commerce Center, Scottsdale, Arizona 580,000 1,001,000 542,000 1,039,000 341,000 1983
--------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total office buildings 580,000 1,001,000 542,000 1,039,000 341,000
--------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:
Fulton Square, Sacramento, California Leased 3,613,000 69,000 3,544,000 369,000 1980
Totem Square, Kirkland, Washington 3,175,000 5,917,000 604,000 8,488,000 588,000 1981
515 S. Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, California 1,410,000 4,335,000 1,678,000 4,067,000 695,000 1915/1988
--------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total commercial buildings 4,585,000 13,865,000 2,351,000 16,099,000 1,652,000
--------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
HOTELS:
Casa Grande Motor Inn, Aroyo Grande, California 1,289,000 5,163,000 2,970,000 3,482,000 236,000 1984
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total hotels 1,289,000 5,163,000 2,970,000 3,482,000 236,000
--------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total Investment in Real Estate $6,454,000 20,029,000 5,863,000 20,620,000 2,229,000
========= ========== ========= ========== =========
<CAPTION>
Column A Column H Column I
-------- --------
Life on Which
Depreciation in
Latest Income
Date Statement is
Description Acquired Computed
----------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
OFFICE BUILDINGS:
Redfield Commerce Center, Scottsdale, Arizona 5/88 30 Years
Total office buildings
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:
Fulton Square, Sacramento, California 5/91 40 Years
Totem Square, Kirkland, Washington 11/90 40 Years
515 S. Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, California 7/88 40 Years
Total commercial buildings
HOTELS:
Casa Grande Motor Inn, Aroyo Grande, California 9/92 40 Years
Total hotels
Total Investment in Real Estate
</TABLE>
(1) Represents total cost of assets after valuation allowance.
(2) The Trust establishes allowances for possible investment losses
which represent the excess of the carrying value of individual properties
over their appraised or estimated net realizable value. Adverse economic
factors, particularly overbuilt real estate markets resulting in declining
lease renewal rates, were the primary causes of valuation allowances.
41
<PAGE> 45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reconciliation of total real estate carrying values for the three years
ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ASSET RECONCILIATION:
Balance, beginning of year $25,787,000 $43,308,000 $39,079,000
Additions:
Property acquisitions 6,331,000
Acquisitions through foreclosure 5,200,000
Improvements 106,000 1,510,000 377,000
Valuation losses on properties sold 2,880,000 6,930,000
Deductions:
Cost of property sold/disposed (8,084,000) (17,456,000)
Cost of property surrendered
in foreclosure (4,175,000) (4,268,000)
Valuation losses (69,000) (4,330,000) (3,411,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
Balance, end of year $20,620,000 $25,787,000 $43,308,000
=========== =========== ===========
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
RECONCILIATION:
Balance, beginning of year $ 2,520,000 $3,875,000 $3,726,000
Additions:
Depreciation 593,000 841,000 934,000
Deductions:
Accumulated depreciation on
real estate sold (884,000) (1,615,000)
Accumulated depreciation on
property surrendered in foreclosure (581,000) (785,000)
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $2,229,000 $2,520,000 $3,875,000
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
42
<PAGE> 46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
(Notes Receivable Collateralized by Deeds of Trust)
DECEMBER 31, 1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Final
Interest Maturity Prior
Description Rate Date Periodic Payment Terms Liens
----------- -------- -------- ---------------------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FIRST DEEDS OF TRUST:
Office Building, Phoenix,
Arizona 8.00% 1996 Monthly interest only payments N/A
Office/Commercial Building,
Phoenix, Arizona 8.00% 2000 Monthly 5% interest only payments N/A
Retail Building, Tempe
Arizona 9.25% 2017 Monthly principal and interest
payments of $9,249 N/A
SECOND DEEDS OF TRUST:
Commercial Building, Pacheco,
California 9.25% 1998 Monthly interest only payments 2,171,000
Office/retail complex, Fountain 50% of excess cash flows applied to
Valley, California 7.63% 2014 interest and then principal 8,915,000
Office/warehouse complex, 10.00% -
Sunnyvale, California 16.00% 1989 Monthly interest only payments 845,000
Retail Building, Sacramento,
California 11.00% 1994 Monthly interest only payments 1,525,000
Commercial Building, Tempe
Arizona 8.00% 2000 Monthly 4% interest only payments 960,000
-----------
$14,416,000
===========
<CAPTION>
Column A Column F Column G Column H
-------- -------- -------- --------
Valuation Write Carrying Principal Amount of
Face Amount Downs and Amount of Loans Subject to
of Notes Deferred Notes Delinquent Principal
Description Receivable Gains (2) Receivable (1) or Interest
----------- ----------- --------------- -------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FIRST DEEDS OF TRUST:
Office Building, Phoenix,
Arizona 861,000 168,000 693,000 None
Office/Commercial Building,
Phoenix, Arizona 8,882,000 930,000 7,952,000 None
Retail Building, Tempe
Arizona
937,000 937,000 None
SECOND DEEDS OF TRUST:
Commercial Building, Pacheco,
California 763,000 763,000 None
Office/retail complex,
Fountain Valley,
California 6,629,000 5,634,000 995,000 None
Office/warehouse complex,
Sunnyvale, California 2,071,000 2,071,000 2,071,000
Retail Building, Sacramento,
California 211,000 211,000 0 211,000
Commercial Building, Tempe
Arizona 360,000 239,000 121,000 None
----------- ---------- -----------
$20,714,000 $7,182,000 $13,532,000
=========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
(1) Represents carrying amount of notes after valuation allowance and deferred
gains.
(2) The Trust establishes allowances for possible investment losses which
represent the excess of the face amount of the note over the appraised or
estimated net realizable value of the property collateralizing the note.
In addition, deferred gains have been recorded against notes receivable
when required under SFAS 66 (Note 1). Such write downs in no way limit
the obligation of the borrower to comply with the terms of the note.
43
<PAGE> 47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A summary of activity for note receivable collateralized by deeds of trust for
the years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year $14,036,000 13,024,000 26,916,000
Additions:
New loans 175,000 10,578,000
Deferred interest added to
principal balance 49,000
Recognition of deferred gain 12,000 26,000
Deductions:
Notes receivable exchanged with
The Peregrine Real Estate Trust,
formerly Commonwealth Equity
Trust (6,224,000)
Collections from notes receivable (346,000) (5,575,000) (93,000)
Deferred gain on notes
receivable (1,207,000)
Notes receivable eliminated through
offset against note payable (258,000)
Note receivable eliminated
through foreclosure (2,940,000)
Write off of notes receivable (345,000)
Valuation losses on notes
receivable (2,859,000) (4,377,000)
----------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $13,532,000 14,036,000 13,024,000
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
3/31/95 /s/ FRANK A. MORROW
---------------------- -----------------------
Date Frank A. Morrow
Chief Executive Officer
3/31/95 /s/ ARNOLD E. BROWN
---------------------- -----------------------
Date Arnold E. Brown
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
3/31/95 /s/ FRANK A. MORROW
---------------------- -----------------------
Date Frank A. Morrow
Chairman of the Board
3/31/95 /s/ JOHN McMAHAN
---------------------- -----------------------
Date John McMahan
Trustee
3/31/95 /s/ ARNOLD E. BROWN
---------------------- -----------------------
Date Arnold E. Brown
Trustee
45
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH> 3,336
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 22,598
<ALLOWANCES> (13,678)
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 0
<PP&E> 26,483
<DEPRECIATION> (2,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 36,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 115
<BONDS> 8,740
<COMMON> 9,157
0
0
<OTHER-SE> 18,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 36,540
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 4,680
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 2,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 1,408
<LOSS-PROVISION> 119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1,044
<INCOME-PRETAX> 301
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 301
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (36)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (0.00)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED> (0.00)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Shares of beneficial interest equivalents were anti-dilutive. The figures
presented above are simple FDS.
</FN>
</TABLE>
