<PAGE>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-6844
CALPROP CORPORATION
CALIFORNIA 95-4044835
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
13160 MINDANAO WAY, #180
MARINA DEL REY, CALIFORNIA 90292
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES (ZIP CODE)
OR ORGANIZATION)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (310) 306-4314
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- -----------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, no par value NASD Bulletin Board
</TABLE>
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant. The aggregate market value shall be computed by reference
to the price at which the stock was sold or the average bid and asked prices
of such stock, as of a specified date within 60 days prior to the date of
filing.
$2,594,415 at March 12, 1997
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
9,224,585 Shares Outstanding at March 12, 1997
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for 1997 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
report.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Calprop Corporation ("Calprop") designs, constructs and sells single-family
detached and attached homes and townhomes as part of condominiums or planned
unit developments in California. The Company selects and acquires the site,
secures construction financing and constructs and sells homes. The Company
also sells improved lots in California. The Company selects projects of
varying types in several local markets in an effort to reduce the risks
inherent in the residential housing industry. To enable the Company to adapt
to the changing market conditions and to control its overhead expenses, the
Company performs its construction activities through independent
subcontractors under the direction of on-site construction supervisors
employed by the Company rather than employing a permanent construction work
force. The Company does not generally finance the purchase of its homes, but
has done so in the past to facilitate sales and may do so in the future to the
extent it is feasible, if market conditions require such financing. In
addition to the continuing emphasis on single-family construction, the Company
also develops raw land through the planning, zoning, and entitlement process.
During 1996, the Company was primarily engaged in the development and
marketing of 89 single-family detached homes and 53 townhomes. The Company as
of December 31, 1996 has standing inventory (completed homes not sold) of
seven detached houses that should be sold in 1997. Additionally, the Company
has eleven model homes used in selling the various types of housing developed.
Also, during 1997, the Company should complete the construction in process at
December 31, 1996 of 27 townhouses and 42 single-family detached homes. Escrow
has been opened on eleven of the townhomes and nineteen of the detached
houses.
As of December 31, 1996 the Company had six residential housing projects in
various stages of development, consisting of 353 units under current
development and approximately 548 units held for future development, ranging
from less expensive homes for first-time buyers to more expensive near custom
homes.
Residential Housing Industry
The California residential housing industry includes several hundred
developers and home builders of various sizes and capabilities. The
development process starts with the acquisition of a raw parcel of land. The
developer prepares preliminary plans, environmental reports and obtains all
necessary governmental approvals, including zoning and conditional use permits
before subdividing the land into final tract maps and approved development
plans. The subdivided parcel is then graded and the infrastructure of roads,
sewers, storm drains, and public utilities are added to develop finished lots.
Building permits are obtained and housing is constructed, and then sold or
rented. California residential housing is constructed in a variety of types,
including single-family detached homes (ranging from the less expensive
"first-time buyer" homes to the medium priced "trade-up" homes to the more
expensive "custom" homes), patio-homes (adjacent homes with party walls),
condominiums (owner-occupied multifamily housing), and multifamily rental
housing (apartments, retirement homes and other types of nonowner occupied
multifamily housing). Any of these types can be built as part of a planned
unit development with common areas such as green belts, swimming pools and
other recreational facilities for common use by occupants.
The Company's Strategy
In recent years, the Company's strategy has been to acquire land in or near
major urban centers in California and to construct single-family housing for
resale. The Company does not specialize in the construction of a specific type
or design of housing and, although the Company constructs housing only in
California, it does not limit its operation to any specific location in
California. The Company usually acquires project sites which are properly
zoned and subdivided so that the Company can construct and sell single-family
housing in a relatively short period of time, usually two to three years. The
Company will also acquire raw land that is not zoned or subdivided for
investment or for development by processing it through the entitlement process
to obtain proper zoning and other permits necessary for development into
single-family housing and other urban uses.
2
<PAGE>
Future Projects
As the Company intends to continue specializing in the construction and sale
of single-family and multifamily housing, the Company is presently considering
potential projects for development. The following discussion is the process
which the Company follows to acquire land, entitle, market and build
residential housing projects.
Land Acquisition and Construction
In considering the purchase of land for the construction of housing, the
Company takes various factors into account, including, among others,
population growth patterns, availability of utilities and community services
such as water, gas, electricity, sewer, transportation and schools, the
estimated absorption rate for new housing, estimated costs of construction and
success of the Company's past projects in and familiarity with the area.
The Company's long-term strategy is to acquire or option project sites which
are properly zoned and subdivided so that the Company can construct and sell
single-family housing in a relatively short period of time, usually less than
three years, after acquiring the land. Larger projects are constructed in
phases, and the Company determines the number of homes in each phase based
upon the estimated costs of construction and estimated sales schedule. The
division of a project into phases may also be required by the project
construction lender. Although a construction and marketing schedule is
established for all phases at the commencement of a project, the precise
timing of construction of each phase depends on the rate of sales of homes in
previous phases.
In certain instances, the Company purchases land which is not substantially
ready for construction. Depending on the stage of development of the parcel,
the Company might be required to obtain necessary entitlements to subdivide
the parcel of land; these entitlements include environmental clearances,
zoning, subdivision mapping, permits and other governmental approvals. After
the entitlement process the Company would then develop the land through
grading lots and streets, and building the infrastructure of water, sewer,
storm drains, utilities, curbs, streets, and possibly amenities, such as
parks, pools and recreational facilities.
The Company acts as its own general contractor, and its supervisory
employees coordinate all work on a project. The services of independent
architectural, design, engineering and other consulting firms are engaged to
assist in the pre-construction aspects of the project. The Company's
construction activities are conducted through independent subcontractors,
under fixed-price contracts, operating in conformity with plans,
specifications and detailed drawings furnished by the Company and under the
direction of on-site construction supervisors employed by the Company.
Generally, the Company solicits bids from several potential subcontractors and
awards a contract for a single phase of a project based on the subcontracting
bid as well as the Company's knowledge of the subcontractor's work and
reputation. Subcontracting enables the Company to retain the necessary
flexibility to react to changes in the demand for housing, and to utilize the
management strengths, specialization capabilities, equipment and facilities of
its subcontractors without large capital investments of its own.
The Company does not have long-term contractual commitments with any of its
subcontractors, consultants or suppliers of materials. The Company selects
subcontractors who it believes will perform the required work in a timely
manner and whose quality of workmanship meets the Company's standards.
Although some subcontractors employ unionized labor, the Company has not
signed a master labor agreement or experienced any significant delays in
construction as a result of strikes or stoppages; however, there can be no
assurances that the Company will not experience such delays in the future.
The Company secures raw materials, fixtures and furnishings directly or
through its subcontractors from customary trade sources. Although certain
products have been in short supply from time to time, such shortages have not
impaired the Company's ability to conduct its business in the past and are not
expected to do so in the foreseeable future.
3
<PAGE>
Marketing
The Company's marketing department coordinates the design of the homes to be
built and the interior design of model units and the design and preparation of
advertising materials. The Company builds, landscapes and furnishes model
units for public display. After each project is sufficiently completed so as
to permit retail sales to begin, the Company selects a realtor or realty
company to market homes which are under construction or completed.
Projects in which product is currently in the marketing stage are Summertree
Park, Pleasant Oaks Estates, Montserrat and Cypress Cove. All such projects
are being marketed through realtors who have no other affiliation with the
Company.
Warranties
The Company provides a one-year express warranty against defects in
workmanship and materials to purchasers of homes in its projects. In addition,
California law provides the Company's customers certain implied warranties,
the scope and duration of which exceed the Company's express warranties. The
Company requires its subcontractors to indemnify the Company in writing and
requires the insurance of the subcontractor to provide that the Company is a
primary insured and an additional insured from its subcontractors for
liabilities arising from their work, except for liability arising through the
sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Company or from defects in
designs furnished by the Company. Nevertheless, the Company is primarily
liable to its customers for breach of warranty. The Company has builder's
product liability insurance coverage which it believes to be adequate in light
of the Company's claims history.
Schedule II to the financial statements sets forth the Company's warranty
reserves which the Company believes are adequate. Normal warranty costs are
accrued at the close of escrow and held on a project until two years after the
project is completed and all completion bonds posted with governmental
agencies are released. In the past 3 years, the Company has not completely
closed out any projects.
Financing
Generally, the Company acquires a project site for a purchase price paid
with cash or a combination of cash and short-term acquisition financing
secured by the project site. The amount and terms of financing vary from
project to project.
After final working drawings from architects are prepared, the Company
obtains a construction loan, secured by the portion of the project site to
which the loan relates. The Company's construction loans are used to finance
projected construction costs. In order to obtain the construction loan, the
Company must repay all acquisition financing or obtain a reconveyance of that
portion of the project site which is used to secure the construction loan. The
construction loan is due and payable shortly after completion of the
construction being financed. The Company repays construction financing from
the proceeds of project unit sales. The construction financing provides for
release of individual lots for sale during the term of the financing upon
partial repayment of principal in a specified amount per lot. All cash sales
proceeds in excess of the specified release amount are retained by the
Company. If the Company experienced a delay in unit sales following
construction and was unable to extend the term of its construction financing,
the Company would be required to repay the construction financing or obtain
other financing in order to hold the unsold units until market conditions
improved. Although the Company does not arrange third-party financing for its
customers, it has provided secured purchase money financing from time to time
to the extent required by market conditions. In addition, the Company in the
future may also subsidize home purchasers, as an alternative to providing
direct financing, by "buying down" the interest rate on loans from lending
institutions, the extent and amount of which would depend upon prevailing
market conditions and interest rate levels at the time.
The Company usually receives the full sales price for its homes in cash at
the closing of purchase escrows. Most of the Company's home purchasers obtain
conventional financing from independent financial institutions.
4
<PAGE>
Depending upon the price range of the homes in a particular project and the
prevailing mortgage market in the area, the financing obtained by the
Company's qualifying home purchasers may be insured either by the Federal
Housing Administration ("FHA") or guaranteed by the Veterans Administration
("VA"). As a result of government regulations, FHA and VA financing of the
purchase of homes from the Company is limited because, among other things, the
loan amount may not exceed certain specified levels.
Competition
The home building industry is highly competitive, particularly in the large
urban areas of California. In each of the areas in which it operates, the
Company competes in terms of location, design, quality, price and available
mortgage financing with numerous other residential construction firms,
including large national and regional firms, many of which have greater
financial resources than the Company. The Company believes that no single
competitor dominates any single market area served by the Company.
For projects in master planned developments, the Company's units are
adjacent to those of other builders and usually marketed at the same time
through participation in joint advertising programs. While this often
increases direct competition for the Company, it also attracts a larger group
of potential purchasers than would be the case if the Company advertised by
itself.
Business Risks
The development, construction and sale of single-family homes generally are
subject to various risks, including, among others, possible changes in the
governmental structure of the project locality, possible shortages of suitable
undeveloped land at reasonable prices, unfavorable general and local economic
conditions such as employment conditions and income levels of the general
population, adverse local market conditions resulting from such unfavorable
economic conditions or competitive overbuilding, increases in prevailing
interest rates, increases in real estate taxes and the cost of materials and
labor, and the availability of construction financing and home mortgage
financing attractive to home purchasers. In addition, the demand for
residential housing depends in part on the tax consequences of home ownership
to home purchasers. There have been various tax legislation proposals before
Congress over the past few years which could reduce the tax advantages
currently associated with home ownership. There can be no assurances that any
such legislation, if enacted, would not adversely impact the residential
housing industry in general or the Company's business and results of
operations.
The Company's business in particular depends upon the successful completion
of construction and sale of homes on established schedules. Construction and
sale schedules may be adversely affected by a variety of factors which are not
within the Company's control, including the factors described above, inclement
weather conditions, earthquakes, labor and material shortages and strikes.
Although the Company has not experienced any serious labor or material
shortages in recent years, the residential housing industry from time to time
experiences serious labor and material shortages.
Governmental Regulations
The residential housing industry is also subject to increasing
environmental, building, zoning and real estate sales regulation by various
federal, state and local governmental authorities. Such regulations affect
home building by specifying, among other things, the type and quality of
building material which must be used, certain aspects of land use and building
design, as well as the manner in which the Company conducts its sales, lending
activities and other dealings with its customers. For example, the Federal
Consumer Credit Protection Act requires, among other things, certain
disclosures to purchasers about finance charges in credit transactions, such
as sales financed by the Company. California law requires that full
information concerning certain subdivisions be filed with the California Real
Estate Commissioner, and in such instances no sales may be made to the public
until the Commissioner has issued a public report which is delivered to
purchasers. Because the Company's competitors are also subject to the
foregoing regulation, the Company believes that it is not placed at a
competitive disadvantage, except to the extent that competitors with greater
financial resources and greater
5
<PAGE>
volume of development activity may more readily withstand longer delays and
increased costs in the development of projects.
Although the strategy of the Company is to build homes on land which is
already subdivided, zoned and improved with utilities, the Company
occasionally undertakes projects which entail the subdivision of partially
improved land. In such cases the Company is required to obtain the approval of
numerous governmental authorities regulating such matters as permitted land
uses and levels of population density, access to utility services such as
water and waste disposal, and the dedication of acreage for open space, parks,
schools and other community purposes. Furthermore, changes in prevailing local
circumstances or applicable law, including moratoria, zoning changes and other
governmental actions, can require additional approvals or modification of
approvals previously obtained. As a result of such regulation, the time
between the original acquisition and the commencement and completion of a
project can increase significantly. Furthermore, the commencement or
completion of a project could be precluded entirely, in which case the Company
would sustain a substantial loss on the project.
Employees
The Company has approximately 21 full-time employees, including four
executive officers, nine persons in its finance, marketing and operations
departments, and eight field superintendents and general laborers. The Company
also employs temporary and part-time laborers from time to time as necessary.
None of the Company's employees is currently represented by a collective
bargaining unit. The Company compensates its employees with salaries and
fringe benefits that it believes are competitive with the building industry
and the local economy. The Company believes that relations with its employees
generally are excellent.
Licensing
The Company is licensed by the State of California as a general building
contractor, and this license is essential to its operations. This license must
be renewed every two years. The Company's current license expires in June 1998
and the Company expects to renew its license on or before expiration.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Current projects
The table below sets forth certain information relating to the Company's
current projects as of December 31, 1996 and certain information relating to
the Company's development operations during the previous twelve months. In
addition, the Company owns 517 entitled lots in Victorville, California and 31
entitled lots in unincorporated territory of Riverside County, California.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS SOLD REMAINING
SOLD UNDER COMPLETED SUBJECT TO UNITS TO
12 MONTHS CONSTRUCTION AND UNSOLD CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCT
ENDED AS OF AS OF AS OF AS OF
PROJECT 12/31/96 12/31/96 12/31/96 12/31/96 12/31/96
- ------- --------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1. Montana Del Lago..... -- -- -- -- 41
2. Elysian 2............ -- -- -- -- 100
3. Summertree Park-Elk
Grove.................. 21 19 4 1 73
4. Cypress Cove......... 26 27 -- 11 --
5. Pleasant Oaks
Estates................ 2 2 -- 2 --
6. Montserrat........... 17 21 3 19 52
7. Mission Gorge........ -- -- -- -- --
--- --- --- --- ---
66 69 7 33 266
=== === === === ===
Total inventory units as
of 12/31/96 (including
11 model units)........ 353
===
</TABLE>
6
<PAGE>
1. MONTANA DEL LAGO (RANCHO SANTA MARGUERITA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Montana Del Lago project consists of 41 units of single-family detached
housing. The project consists of two models ranging from 1,281 to 1,412 square
feet with base sales prices before lot premiums or sales incentives of
$148,900 to $160,900. Construction of the project's first phase of 21 units
and two models is anticipated to begin in the second quarter of 1997.
The project is located about 50 miles southeast of Los Angeles along
Interstate 5 near Newport Beach.
The Company's construction loan from United Savings Bank is expected to
permit borrowing by the Company of up to an aggregate amount of $5,100,000 on
this project and to bear interest at 1.5% in excess of the bank's reference
rate.
In 1996, the Company formed DMM Development Co., LLC, a California limited
liability company, ("DMM") with RGC Courthomes, Inc., a California
corporation, ("RGC"). In October, 1996, the 41 lots were acquired by DMM. The
net proceeds, as defined in the DMM operating agreement, are to be distributed
between the members as follows, 33.3% to RGC and 66.7% to the Company.
The Company has an acquisition loan with the Curci-Turner Company on the
entire 41 lots of the project. The loan permits borrowing by the Company of
$650,000 on this project and bears interest at 12%. The loan contains a profit
sharing provision in the amount of 33% of "net proceeds" as defined in the
agreement. As of December 31, 1996, $650,000 of the principal of this loan was
outstanding.
2. ELYSIAN 2 (DEL MAR HEIGHTS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Elysian 2 project consists of 100 units of single-family detached
housing. The project consists of three models ranging from 1,212 to 1,567
square feet with base sales prices before lot premiums or sales incentives of
$192,900 to $236,900. Construction of the project's first phase of 21 units
and two models is anticipated to begin in the second quarter of 1997.
The project is located about 20 miles north of San Diego along Interstate 5.
The Company's construction loan from Imperial Bank is expected to permit
borrowing by the Company of up to an aggregate amount of $15,000,000 on this
project and to bear interest at 1.5% in excess of the bank's reference rate.
In 1996, the Company formed DMM Development Co., LLC, a California limited
liability company, ("DMM") with RGC. In December, 1996, the 100 lots were
acquired by DMM. The net proceeds, as defined in the DMM operating agreement,
are to be distributed between the members as follows, 33.3% to RGC and 66.7%
to the Company.
The Company has an acquisition loan with the Curci-Turner Company on the
entire 100 lots of the project. The loan permits borrowing by the Company of
$3,050,000 on this project and bears interest at 12%. The loan contains a
profit sharing provision in the amount of 33.3% of "net proceeds" as defined
in the agreement. As of December 31, 1996, $3,050,000 of the principal of this
loan was outstanding
3. SUMMERTREE PARK (ELK GROVE, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Summertree Park project consists of 120 units of single-family detached
housing. The first phase of 22 units and four models was released for
construction in July of 1995. The Company closed escrow on 21 of these units
during 1996. The first phase product has been discontinued and presently two
units remain unsold. The project presently consists of three models ranging
from 1,509 to 2,183 square feet with base sales prices, before lot premiums or
sales incentives, of $129,900 to $157,900. Construction of 18 units and three
models began in October 1996. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had not
released any units of the second phase product for sale.
7
<PAGE>
The project is located about 20 miles south of Sacramento along Highway 99.
The Company's construction loans on the first and second phases of
construction were secured with Imperial Bank. The loans permit borrowing by
the Company of $4,890,000 and $2,092,967 on this project and bear interest at
the bank's reference rate plus 1.5%. As of December 31, 1996, the outstanding
principal of these loans were $255,659 and $393,705, respectively, and the
Company had available $58,561and $1,699,262, respectively. The Company
believes these funds are adequate to complete the construction of the first
and second phases of construction.
The Company has an acquisition/construction loan with the Curci-Turner
Company on the entire 120 lots of the project. The loan permits borrowing by
the Company of $4,000,000 on this project and bears interest at 10%. The loan
contains a profit sharing provision in the amount of 40% of "net proceeds" as
defined in the agreement. As of December 31, 1996, $3,607,681 of the principal
of this loan was outstanding.
4. CYPRESS COVE (HALF MOON BAY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Cypress Cove project consists of 128 units of townhomes. The project
consists of 4 plans ranging from 1,282 to 1,659 square feet with base sales
prices, before lot premiums or sales incentives, of $239,900 to $294,900. The
Company released the project's first 22 units and four models for construction
in 1991, sixteen homes in 1992, thirteen homes in 1993, 37 homes in 1994 and
the remaining 36 homes in 1996. The Company closed escrow on two homes in
1991, 21 homes in 1992, sixteen homes in 1993, seventeen homes in 1994,
fifteen homes in 1995 and 26 homes in 1996. The Company had no unsold
completed inventory as of December 31, 1996.
The project is located about 30 miles South of San Francisco along Highway
1, 10 miles from San Mateo.
The Company's construction loan on sixteen units was secured with United
Savings Bank. The loan permits borrowing by the Company of $2,700,000 on this
project and bears interest at the bank's reference rate plus 1.75%. As of
December 31, 1996, $556,441 of the principal of this loan was outstanding and
the Company has available $806,691. The Company believes these funds are
adequate to complete the construction of the sixteen units of construction.
The Company has an acquisition/construction loan with the Curci-Turner
Company on 20 lots of the project. The loan permits borrowing by the Company
of $2,100,000 on this project and bears interest at 12%. The loan contains a
profit sharing provision in the amount of 50% of "net proceeds" as defined in
the agreement. As of December 31, 1996, $1,579,182 of the principal of this
loan was outstanding and the Company has available $520,818. The Company
believes these funds are adequate to complete the construction of the 20 units
of construction.
5. PLEASANT OAKS ESTATES (THOUSAND OAKS, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Pleasant Oaks Estates project consists of fourteen units of single-
family detached housing. The project consists of product ranging from 2,800 to
3,300 square feet with base sales prices before lot premiums or sales
incentives of $375,000 to $495,000. The Company released nine units and one
model for construction in 1994 and the final four units in 1995. The Company
closed escrow on ten homes in 1995 and two in 1996. The Company had no unsold
completed inventory as of December 31, 1996.
The project is located about 30 miles northwest of Los Angeles along Highway
101.
The Company's construction loan on one unit was secured with CenFed Bank.
The loan permits borrowing by the Company of $260,000 on this project and
bears interest at the bank's reference rate plus 2.0%. As of December 31,
1996, $257,425 of the principal of this loan was outstanding and the Company
has available $2,575.
8
<PAGE>
6. MONTSERRAT (MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Montserrat project consists of 97 units of single-family detached
housing. The project consists of four models ranging from 2,280 to 3,389
square feet with base sales prices before lot premiums or sales incentives of
$169,900 to $219,900. The Company released for construction four models and 41
units in 1996. The remaining 54 units will be released as sales permit. The
Company closed escrow on seventeen units in 1996 and as of December 31, 1996,
the Company had three units of completed and unsold inventory.
The project is located about 65 miles southeast of Los Angeles along Highway
15.
The Company secured a $1,346,000 acquisition loan from L & N Consultants,
Inc., the land seller, which bears interest at prime plus 2.0%. As of December
31, 1996, $728,900 of principal was outstanding.
The Company's construction loan on the 24 units including four models and 21
units was secured in 1996 with Imperial Bank. The loans permit borrowing by
the Company of $3,465,000 and $3,721,851, respectively, on this project and
bears interest at the bank's reference rate plus 1.75% and 1.5%, respectively.
As of December 31, 1996, the first of these loans was paid in its entirety,
while $1,342,954 of the principal of the second of these loans was
outstanding. The Company had available $1,336,424 to complete the 21 units,
which the Company believes is a sufficient amount to complete the units.
The Company has a model and acquisition loan with the Curci-Turner Company
on four model units and 21 units of the project. The loans permit borrowing by
the Company of $400,000 and $1,487,500, respectively and bear interest at 12%.
The loans contain a profit sharing provision in the amount of 50% of "net
proceeds" as defined in the agreement. As of December 31, 1996, $400,000 and
$472,500, respectively, of the principal of these loans were outstanding.
7. MISSION GORGE (SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
The Company, in 1987, purchased approximately 200 acres of land in San
Diego. Previous owners, as a part of a group of property owners, had entered
into an option agreement with another developer to acquire the group's
property, upon obtaining an Amended Community Plan for the community in which
the property is located. At the present time, the Amended Community Plan has
not been completed. The Company is actively pursuing alternative land
development opportunities.
The Company formed the Mission Gorge, LLC, a California limited liability
company, with the Curci-Turner Company for the purposes of developing the 200
acres of the Mission Gorge project. The net proceeds are to be divided
equally, as defined in the operating agreement, among the two members, Calprop
Corp. and Curci-Turner Company.
Land Held for Investment
1. BRENTWOOD (VICTORVILLE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA)
This project consists of 517 lots. The Company substantially completed the
entitlement process on the project during 1992. The project is part of a Mello
Roos Community Facilities District for major infrastructure in the Victorville
area. The Company has considered selling the vacant land, and has valued the
investment accordingly. However, in the future, the Company may ultimately
decide to build single-family housing on 140 lots, with homes averaging 1000
square feet and average sales prices near $85,000. The plans for the remaining
377 lots include lot sales to other builders and possibly a second project for
which the basic parameters have not been determined.
The project is located about 90 miles northeast of Los Angeles and 30 miles
north of San Bernardino near Interstate 15 and Highway 395.
9
<PAGE>
2. MOCKINGBIRD CANYON (UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA)
The project originally consisted of 162 lots. The Company owned 31 lots and
131 lots were subject to a first trust deed with the original seller of the
property. In November of 1990 the Company received a notice of default on the
loan. The 131 lots were sold in foreclosure on March 13, 1991. The Company
completed the entitlement process on the remaining 31 lots during 1991. In the
future, the Company is planning on building single-family homes averaging
3,200 square feet and average sales prices near $390,000 on the 31 lots.
The project is located about 90 miles east of Los Angeles and 30 miles south
of San Bernardino along Interstate 15.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to
which any of its properties are subject other than routine litigation
incidental to the Company's business, none of which is considered by the
Company to be material to its business or operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of Registrant's security holders during
the fourth quarter of 1996.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Since October 1, 1996, transactions in the Company's common stock, its only
class of common equity security, have been regularly quoted on the NASD
Bulletin Board under the symbol CLPO. Prior to October 1, 1996, the Company's
common stock was traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol, CPP.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 stock price range--
High....................................... 1 1/4 1 1/8 1 5/8
Low........................................ 1/2 3/8 3/8 3/16
1995 stock price range--
High....................................... 1 3/8 1 3/8 1 1/4 1 1/8
Low........................................ 5/8 1 7/8 5/8
</TABLE>
- --------
As of March 12, 1997, there were 557 record holders of common stock.
Source of Information: Chase Mello Shareholder Services
Dividends: There have been no cash dividends declared in the past three years,
nor was there a stock dividend declared during 1996 or 1995. The
dividend policy, whether cash or stock, is reviewed by the Board of
Directors on an annual basis. During 1996, there were no restrictions,
as a result of a loan or other agreement, limiting the Company's
ability to issue a dividend.
10
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following data should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements of the Company and the related notes thereto which are included
elsewhere in this Form 10K and in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which is also
included elsewhere in this Form 10K.
FOR THE FIVE YEAR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and operating
revenue................ $13,717,126 $17,061,239 $18,733,525 $23,431,438 $ 34,135,653
(Loss) income before
extraordinary item..... (9,200,342) 513,381 (1,628,889) (3,147,770) (22,741,204)
Extraordinary item--
extinguishment of debt. -- -- -- 610,893 17,377,400
Net (loss) income....... (9,200,342) 513,381 (1,628,889) (2,536,877) (5,363,804)
(Loss) income before
extraordinary item per
common share........... (1.28) 0.01 (0.44) (0.70) (4.86)
Extraordinary item per
common share........... -- -- -- $ 0.13 $ 3.71
Net (loss) income per
common share........... (1.28) 0.01 (0.44) (0.57) (1.15)
As of December 31:
Total assets............ $27,533,378 $31,805,263 $30,433,365 $31,851,283 $ 46,284,622
Long term obligations... $14,993,355 $10,444,731 $ 4,336,544 $ 828,263 $ 5,719,587
</TABLE>
The extraordinary items in 1992 and 1993 are a result of forgiveness of debt.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The Company began experiencing difficulties due to the down turn in the
California real estate market during the second quarter of 1990, and the
Company has continued through 1996 to be impacted by the general economic
downturn. In response to these conditions the Company began utilizing marketing
programs which included price reductions and incentives to potential buyers.
The decrease in sales revenue between 1994 and 1995 is primarily attributable
to a decrease in units sold. The Company's sales decreased from $18,733,525 in
1994 to $17,061,239 in 1995. The Company sold 104 units in 1994 as opposed to
76 in 1995. The Company's gross profit increased from $118,789 in 1994 to
$824,406 in 1995, primarily as a result of the reversal of warranty reserves in
the amount of $733,672 as a result of the settlement of a lawsuit.
The decrease in sales, and cost of sales between 1995 and 1996 is primarily
attributable to a decrease in units sold and the mix of units sold. The
Company's sales decreased from $17,061,239 in 1995 to $13,717,126 in 1996. The
Company sold 76 units in 1995 as opposed to 66 in 1996. The Company's gross
profit decreased from $824,406 in 1995 to a gross loss of $432,998 in 1996.
Such gross loss was a result of increased incentives required to stimulate
sales, increased capitalized overhead and interest due to slower absorption and
increased warranty costs.
In 1993, the Company's Oceanside property was taken by the State of
California through eminent domain. The Company received a deposit of probable
compensation of $2,332,000 from the State and a loss was recorded at that time.
In January 1995, a valuation trial was held, and the verdict entitled the
Company to an additional $2,080,900, plus interest. On March 24, 1995, the
Company received $2,280,363 in settlement of this matter, which was recorded as
income in the first quarter of 1995. The reversal of warranty reserves and the
settlement with the State of California contributed to net income of $513,381
in 1995.
11
<PAGE>
In 1996, the Company recognized impairment of real estate under development
and land held for investment in the amount of $6,093,475. Impairment losses
recognized on the Company's real estate under development projects, Pleasant
Oaks Estates, Cypress Cove, and Summertree Park, Elk Grove, were $1,014,629,
$1,540,972 and $1,911,676, respectively. The impairment loss recognized on the
Company's land held for investment, the Victorville project, was $1,626,198.
The impairment loss on the Pleasant Oaks Estates project is primarily a
result of additional municipal requirements in 1996 which contributed to a
significant delay of the completion of the final units. Additional land
development costs were incurred to satisfy the municipal requirements, and as
a result of the delay, the Company incurred increased project overhead and
interest costs, and was forced to reduce sales prices and raise incentives as
the competition in this market increased.
The impairment loss on the Cypress Cove project is due to the Company
incurring increased production overhead, interest and marketing costs as a
result of a slow down in absorption due to a decreased customer base, and an
increased production period, as the area experienced the impact of inclement
weather conditions in the winter and spring of 1996, including the closure of
a major access road from the San Francisco Bay Area. Additionally, in order to
revitalize the project subsequent to the storms in 1996, the Company increased
sales incentives.
The impairment loss on the Summertree Park, Elk Grove project is primarily a
result of a slower absorption caused by a sagging real estate market in the
Sacramento area. As a result, the Company discontinued the product after the
first phase of production, and began to develop a new product line in 1996,
which the Company plans to open in April 1997. The Company incurred increased
capitalized marketing, production overhead and interest costs as models were
constructed for the new product line. Contributing to additional production
overhead and interest costs relating to the development of the new product,
the carrying costs for the development were further increased as inclement
weather conditions in the area during the winter and spring of 1996 hampered
sales and the development efforts. Additionally, in order to increase the
absorption of the old product line, the Company increased sales incentives.
The impairment loss recognized on the Company's land held for investment,
the Victorville property, was a result of the Company valuing the land based
on the sale of the vacant lots as opposed to the development of the project.
The Company has continued its program of cost reduction and control in all
areas of its operations. Based on current economic factors, interest rates and
current product mix, the Company does not anticipate a significant turnaround
in profitability until 1998, at the earliest.
Results of operations
The Company had a net loss of $1,628,889 in 1994, a net income of $513,381
in 1995 and a net loss of $9,200,342 in 1996. The net loss in 1994 is the
result of a continuing soft California housing market. The net income in 1995
is primarily the result of both the favorable $2,332,000 State of California
settlement and the reversal of $729,933 in warranty reserves as a result of
the settlement of a lawsuit. The net loss suffered in 1996 is primarily
reflected in the additional recognition of asset impairment of the Company's
properties in the amount of $6,093,475.
Gross revenues decreased from $18,733,525 in 1994 to $17,061,239 in 1995
(9%) and then to $13,717,126 in 1996 (20%). In 1994, the Company sold 104
homes. The average sales price of a home sold in 1994 was $180,130. In 1995,
the Company sold 76 homes and two lots. The average sales price of a home sold
in 1995 was $223,174. In 1996, the Company sold 66 homes. The average sales
price of a home sold in 1996 was $204,733.
The overall gross profit percentage of the Company changed from 0.6 percent
in 1994 to 4.8 percent in 1995 to a negative 3.2 percent in 1996. The
Company's gross overall profit percentage has been adversely
12
<PAGE>
impacted by profit participation payments made to construction lenders,
increased incentives required to stimulate sales, increased capitalized
overhead and interest due to slower absorption and increased warranty costs.
The reversal of warranty reserves positively impacted the gross profit in 1995
while increased warranty costs negatively impacted the gross profit in 1996.
General and administrative expenses increased from $2,166,236 in 1994 to
$2,454,220 in 1995, and then decreased to $2,332,444 in 1996 for a 13.3
percent increase from 1994 to 1995 and a 5.0 percent decrease to 1996. The
increase from 1994 to 1995 is the result of increased payroll costs, increased
accounting costs incurred to both resolve an Internal Revenue Service audit
and file an amended 1993 tax return in pursuit of a tax refund, and increased
general liability insurance premiums.
Both the increase in other income from 1994 to 1995 and the decrease from
1995 to 1996 is due primarily to the State of California settlement which
resulted in $2,332,000 of income.
Liquidity and capital resources
During 1995, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $4,000,000 from
the Curci-Turner Company for the acquisition and development of the Summertree
Park project. In addition to interest, this loan contains a profit sharing
provision which provides that Curci-Turner Company receive 40% of "Net
Proceeds" as defined in the agreement, which is comparable to gross profit. As
of December 31, 1996, the outstanding balance owing on this loan totaled
$3,607,681.
In 1995, CenFed Bank made a loan commitment on the Company's Pleasant Oaks
Estates project in the amount of $260,000, Imperial Bank made a loan
commitment on the Company's Summertree Park project in Sacramento County in
the amount of $4,890,000, Keros-Mozilo Mortgage Bankers made a loan commitment
on the model complex of the Company's Cypress Cove project in the amount of
$840,000, and L & N Consultants, Inc. made a loan commitment on the developed
lots in the Company's Montserrat project in the amount of $1,346,000. As of
December 31, 1996, the outstanding balances owing on these loans were
$257,425, $255,656, $840,000 and $728,900, respectively.
During 1996, the Curci-Turner Company made loans of $1,487,500 and
$2,100,000 to the Company secured by 21 lots and a four unit model complex in
the Montserrat project in Murrieta, California and 20 units in the Cypress
Cove project, respectively. In addition to interest, this loan contains a
profit sharing provision which provides that Curci-Turner Company receives 50%
of "Net Proceeds" as defined in the agreements, which is comparable to gross
profit. As of December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal on these two notes
was $872,500 and $1,579,182, respectively.
During 1996, the Curci-Turner Company made a loan of $3,700,000 to the
Company secured by 41 lots in the Montana Del Lago project in Rancho Santa
Marguerita and 100 lots in the Elysian 2 project. In addition to interest,
this loan contains a profit sharing provision which provides that Curci-Turner
Company receive 33.3%, respectively, of "Net Proceeds" as defined in the
agreement. As of December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal on this note was
$3,700,000.
During 1996, the Curci-Turner Company made an unsecured loan of $1,000,000
to the Company. Additionally, the Company converted its Preferred Stock to
Common Stock and the accrued Preferred Stock dividend due Curci-Turner Company
of $472,645 was exchanged for a note with interest payable at 10%. As of
December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal on these notes was $500,000 and
$472,645, respectively.
During 1996, Imperial Bank made loan commitments of $3,721,851 on the
Montserrat project and $2,092,967 on the Summertree Park project. United
Saving Bank made a loan commitment of $2,700,000 on the Cypress Cove project.
As of December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal balances owing on these
loans was $393,705, $1,699,262 and $556,441, respectively.
13
<PAGE>
During 1996, the Company borrowed $1,900,000 from an officer of the Company.
Additionally, the Company converted its Preferred Stock to Common Stock and
the accrued Preferred Stock dividend in the amount of $581,542 was exchanged
for a note with interest payable at 10%. As of December 31, 1996, the
outstanding principal on these notes was $1,140,000 and $581,542,
respectively.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company has an outstanding balance on the
Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds (CFD), issued by the City of
Victorville, California, of $2,336,544. Given the weakness in the Victorville
housing market, the Company has determined that servicing the nonrecourse bond
liability is not a prudent use of capital. As of December 31, 1996, the
Company had a delinquency of $446,759 for the Victorville bond liability
principal and accrued interest.
During 1996, the Company borrowed additional amounts primarily for the
purposes of financing insurance premiums and other miscellaneous purposes. As
of December 31, 1996, the combined outstanding principal balance was $717,566.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had remaining loan commitments from
banks and a related party of approximately $4,940,000 and $1,820,000,
respectively, which may be drawn down by the Company upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions. The Company continues to seek joint venture partners and
additional financing to fund its operations.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company does not have any material commitments
for capital expenditures in 1997.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had six projects in various stages of
development, with four producing revenues from completed homes: Cypress Cove,
Summertree Park, Pleasant Oaks Estates and Montserrat. The remaining two
projects, Montana Del Lago and Elysian 2, are in the initial stages of
development. The Company enters 1997 with 69 homes under construction of which
33 homes are sold and seven homes completed and unsold. Additionally, the
Company has an inventory of 266 improved lots and 548 mapped unimproved lots.
Based on its agreements with its lenders, the Company believes that it will
have sufficient liquidity to finance its construction projects in 1997 through
funds generated from operations, funds available under its existing bank
commitments, funds generated from new lending institutions, and, if necessary,
funds that could be obtained by using its internally financed real estate
development in process as collateral for additional loans.
Management's plan, with respect to managing cash flow includes the following
components: pay off debt that is coming due in 1997, minimize operating
expenses, and maintain control over costs. With regard to the debt coming due
in 1997, management expects to pay these loans off through cashflow from
operations, prior to their maturity date. With regard to minimizing operating
expenses, management plans to achieve this by continuing to closely examine
overhead items. Management anticipates that the funds generated from
operations, including borrowings from existing loan commitments, will be
adequate to allow the Company to continue operations throughout 1997.
Effects of inflation
Real estate has long been considered a hedge against inflation, and
inflation has often contributed to dramatic growth in property values. During
normal markets the Company has been able to pass increased costs of materials
and labor to its buyers by increasing its sales prices. However, growth in
property values slowed or reversed during 1995, 1996 and 1997 in California,
thus preventing the Company from increasing sales prices to cover increased
costs.
14
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE NO. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
-------- ---------------------
<C> <S>
16 Independent Auditors' Report
18 Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
19 Statements of Operations--Three Years Ended December 31, 1996
20 Statements of Stockholders' Equity--Three Years Ended December 31,
1996
21 Statements of Cash Flows--Three Years Ended December 31, 1996
23 Notes to Financial Statements
SCHEDULE SUPPORTING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
-----------------------------------------
33 II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts--Three Years Ended December 31,
1996
</TABLE>
ITEM 9. DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 are incorporated by reference from the Company's
definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the close of the
calendar year with the Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)(1) and (2) For a listing of financial statements and schedules,
reference is made to Item 8 included in this Form 10-K.
(3) The Exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits immediately
following Schedule II are filed as part of this report. Exhibits 10.1 through
10.4 are compensatory plans.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K--
No Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ending on December
31, 1996.
15
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CALPROP CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Date: March 26, 1997 /s/ Victor Zaccaglin
-------------------------------------
Victor Zaccaglin
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ Mark F. Spiro Vice President/Secretary March 26, 1997
------------------------------------ and Treasurer (Chief
Mark F. Spiro Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Ronald S. Petch President March 26, 1997
------------------------------------
Ronald S. Petch
/s/ George R. Bravante, Jr. Director March 26, 1997
------------------------------------
George R. Bravante, Jr.
/s/ John L. Curci Director March 26, 1997
------------------------------------
John L. Curci
/s/ Victor Zaccaglin Chairman of the Board March 26, 1997
------------------------------------ Chief Executive Officer
Victor Zaccaglin
</TABLE>
16
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of
Calprop Corporation
Los Angeles, California:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Calprop Corporation as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1996. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in the index at Item 8. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Calprop Corporation as of December 31,
1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 19, 1997
17
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ASSETS 1996 1995
------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT (Notes 1, 2 and 5)......... $ 21,908,164 $ 24,862,199
INVESTMENT IN LAND (Note 3)........................ 4,037,187 5,655,063
------------ ------------
TOTAL INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE.................... 25,945,351 30,517,262
------------ ------------
OTHER ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 1)............... 1,224,780 758,323
Prepaid expenses................................. 29,587 288,548
Deferred and other assets (Note 4)............... 333,660 241,130
------------ ------------
Total other assets............................. 1,588,027 1,288,001
------------ ------------
$ 27,533,378 $ 31,805,263
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 1996 1995
------------------------------------ ------------ ------------
TRUST DEEDS AND NOTES PAYABLE (NOTE 5)............. $ 5,011,866 $ 4,682,926
RELATED PARTY NOTES (NOTE 5 )...................... 12,528,550 7,575,000
------------ ------------
Total trust deeds and notes payable............ 17,540,416 12,257,926
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX BONDS
(NOTE 3 and 5 )................................... 2,336,544 2,336,544
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES........... 3,025,783 1,993,056
WARRANTY RESERVES (NOTE 1)......................... 261,401 301,700
ACCRUED DIVIDENDS PAYABLE ON PREFERRED STOCK (NOTE
7)................................................ -- 929,262
------------ ------------
Total liabilities.............................. 23,164,144 17,818,488
MINORITY INTEREST (NOTE 2)......................... 10,000 --
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 10)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (NOTES 7 and 8):
Convertible preferred stock, no par value
Authorized--6,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--no shares outstanding
at December 31, 1996, and 3,571,368 shares at
December 31, 1995 (Note 7).................... -- 4,571,351
Common stock, no par value--
Authorized--20,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--9,224,585 and 4,899,030
shares at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 respectively....... 9,224,585 4,899,030
Additional paid-in capital....................... 25,911,579 25,910,018
Deferred Compensation (Note 8)................... (68,655) (87,938)
Accumulated deficit.............................. (30,708,275) (21,305,686)
------------ ------------
Total Equity................................... 4,359,234 13,986,775
------------ ------------
$ 27,533,378 $ 31,805,263
============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
18
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS (Notes 1 and 2):
Real estate sales...................... $13,717,126 $17,061,239 $18,733,525
Cost of real estate sales.............. 14,150,124 16,236,833 18,614,736
----------- ----------- -----------
(432,998) 824,406 118,789
Recognition of impairment of real
estate under
development and land held for
investment (Note 2)................... (6,093,475) -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) income from development
operations.......................... (6,526,473) 824,406 118,789
Other Income (Note 9).................... 181,788 2,406,350 785,329
Other Expenses:
General and administrative............. 2,332,444 2,429,009 2,166,236
Interest Expense (Note 5).............. 217,854 25,211 --
Investment property holding costs (Note
3).................................... 305,359 263,155 366,771
----------- ----------- -----------
Total other expenses................. 2,855,657 2,717,375 2,533,007
----------- ----------- -----------
NET (LOSS) INCOME........................ $(9,200,342) $ 513,381 $(1,628,889)
=========== =========== ===========
NET (LOSS) INCOME ALLOCABLE TO COMMON
STOCK................................... $(9,402,589) $ 48,938 $(2,093,674)
=========== =========== ===========
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE (NOTE 1)..... $ (1.28) $ 0.01 $ (0.44)
=========== =========== ===========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK............................ 7,346,772 4,836,393 4,762,382
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements
19
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL TOTAL
----------------------- --------------------- PAID-IN DEFERRED ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL COMPENSATION DEFICIT EQUITY
---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE,
January 1, 1994...... 3,576,301 $ 4,577,665 4,763,276 $4,763,276 $25,956,826 -- $(19,260,950) $16,036,817
Net loss............. (1,628,889) (1,628,889)
Net issuance of
shares under 1989
stock incentive plan
(Note 8)............ 48,540 48,540 (53,871) (5,331)
Conversion of
preferred stock to
common stock........ (1,426) (1,825) 1,825 1,825 --
Dividend accrual--
preferred stock..... (464,785) (464,785)
---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ----------- -------- ------------ -----------
BALANCE,
December 31, 1994.... 3,574,875 $ 4,575,840 4,813,641 $4,813,641 $25,902,955 -- $(21,354,624) $13,937,812
Net Income........... 513,381 513,381
Net issuance of
shares under 1989
stock incentive plan
(Note 8)............ 79,400 79,400 7,438 $(87,938) (1,100)
Issuance of shares
upon exercise of
options issued under
1993 stock option
plan (Note 8)....... 1,500 1,500 (375) 1,125
Conversion of
preferred stock to
common stock........ (3,507) (4,489) 4,489 4,489 --
Dividend accrual--
preferred stock..... (464,443) (464,443)
---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ----------- -------- ------------ -----------
BALANCE,
December 31, 1995.... 3,571,368 $ 4,571,351 4,899,030 $4,899,030 $25,910,018 $(87,938) $(21,305,686) $13,986,775
Net loss............. (9,200,342) (9,200,342)
Cancellation of
shares under 1989
stock incentive plan
(Note 8)............ (3,680) (3,680) 1,561 (2,119)
Amortization of
deferred
compensation
(Note 8)............ 19,283 19,283
Redemption of
preferred stock for
cash................ (189,153) (242,116) (242,116)
Conversion of
preferred stock to
common stock........ (3,382,215) (4,329,235) 4,329,235 4,329,235 --
Dividend accrual--
preferred stock..... (202,247) (202,247)
---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ----------- -------- ------------ -----------
BALANCE,
December 31, 1996.... -- -- 9,224,585 $9,224,585 $25,911,579 $(68,655) $(30,708,275) $ 4,359,234
========== =========== ========= ========== =========== ======== ============ ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
20
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss) income................... $ (9,200,342) $ 513,381 $ (1,628,889)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)
income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization..... 48,109 15,277 61,360
Recognition of impairment of real
estate under development and land
held for investment.............. 6,093,475 -- --
Other............................. -- 86,837 (5,331)
Provision for warranty reserves... 399,905 275,966 143,954
Change in assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in deferred
and other assets................. (49,600) 384,207 (146,102)
(Increase) in investments in land. (8,322) (5,556) --
Decrease (increase) in prepaid
expenses......................... 258,961 (36,712) 94,717
(Decrease) increase in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
and warranty reserves............ (461,635) (1,512,487) 82,173
Additions to real estate
development in process........... (15,663,366) (18,398,550) (14,834,078)
Cost of real estate sales......... 14,150,124 16,236,833 18,614,736
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities........... $ (4,432,691) $ (2,440,804) $ 2,382,540
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital (expenditures) sales........ $ (73,875) $ (39,846) $ 141,373
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings under construction loans-
related parties.................... 10,855,868 6,060,000 11,780,113
Payments under construction loans-
related parties.................... (5,902,318) (3,692,084) (7,726,292)
Borrowings under construction loans. 9,598,373 9,790,510 6,516,665
Payments under construction loans... (9,269,433) (9,882,267) (12,961,742)
Contributions from joint venture
partner............................ 10,000 -- --
Payments of preferred stock
dividends.......................... (77,351) (136,257) --
Redemption of convertible preferred
stock.............................. (242,116) -- --
Payments on bond liability.......... -- (44,888) (81,396)
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock.............................. -- 1,125
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities........... $ 4,973,023 $ 2,096,139 $ (2,472,652)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents........................ 466,457 (384,511) 51,261
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of the year.............. 758,323 1,142,834 1,091,573
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
the year........................... $ 1,224,780 $ 758,323 $ 1,142,834
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
21
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
Cash paid during the periods for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)...... $ 217,854 $ 25,211 $ 141,332
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Accrual of preferred dividend............. (202,247) (464,443) (464,785)
Conversion of preferred stock to common
stock.................................... 4,329,235 -- --
Exchange of real estate under development
of $4,400,984, less a loan payable of
$2,000,000 for fifty percent interest in
a joint venture ......................... 2,000,000 -- --
Record CFD debt and related asset......... -- -- 2,381,432
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
22
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Management's intentions--Since 1990, the Company has experienced
difficulties producing sufficient cash flow from its development operations.
The Company has sold assets and obtained additional loans to maintain a
sufficient level of cash flow to continue its operations. Management's plan,
with respect to managing cash flow includes the following components: pay off
debt that is coming due in 1997, minimize operating expenses, and maintain
control over costs. With regard to the debt coming due in 1997, management
expects to pay these loans off through cashflow from operations, prior to
their maturity date. With regard to minimizing operating expenses, management
plans to achieve this by continuing to closely examine overhead items.
Management anticipates that the funds generated from operations will be
adequate to allow the Company to continue operations throughout 1997.
(b) Nature of operations--The Company is primarily engaged in the
construction and sale of single-family attached and detached homes, including
lot sales.
(c) Use of estimates--The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) Real estate sales--Revenue from real estate sales and related costs are
recognized at the close of escrow, when title passes to the buyer. The Company
follows the guidelines for profit recognition as set forth by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate."
(e) The Company regularly reviews the carrying value of its real estate
developments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the
sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the
asset, the Company recognizes an impairment loss.
Cost of real estate sales is based upon the relative sales value of units
sold to the estimated total sales value of the respective projects.
(f) Warranty reserves--The Company provides a one-year warranty to
purchasers of single-family homes. The Company accrues estimated warranty
costs, based on actual historical costs, on properties as they are sold.
(g) Cash and cash equivalents--For purposes of the statement of cash flows,
cash and cash equivalents include securities purchased with an original
maturity of 90 days or less.
(h) Net income (loss) per share--Net income (loss) per share has been
computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding (7,346,772
in 1996, 4,836,393 in 1995, 4,762,382 in 1994), after giving effect to the
Preferred Stock Dividend of $202,247 in 1996, $464,443 in 1995, $464,787 in
1994.
(i) Accounting Pronouncements--In October 1995, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," which is effective for the
Company beginning January 1, 1996. SFAS No. 123 requires expanded disclosure
of stock-based compensation arrangements with employees and allows for
compensation cost to be measured either based on the fair market value of the
equity instrument awarded or under APB 25, which recognizes compensation cost
based on intrinsic value of the equity instrument awarded. The Company will
continue to
23
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
apply APB Opinion No. 25 to its stock based compensation awards to employees
and will disclose the required pro forma effect on net income and earnings per
share.
(j) Fair Value of Financial Instruments--Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 107, "Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,"
requires disclosure of fair value information on financial instruments, when
it is practicable to estimate that value. Management believes that the book
value of all financial instruments approximates their fair market value as
result of variable interest rates and short term durations.
(k) Basis of consolidation--The accompanying financial statements include
the accounts of Calprop Corporation and all its subsidiaries. The Company
consolidates subsidiaries in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) 94.
The Company has consolidated the financial statements of DMM Development,
LLC ("DMM"). Calprop Corporation is entitled to receive two-thirds of profits
of DMM, and the other owner, RGC Courthomes, Inc. ("RGC"), is entitled to the
remaining one-third of profits. Prior to the allocation of the profits, a
management fee is payable to the both owners based on a percentage of sales.
Such fees as a percentage of sales are 2% and 4%, payable to Calprop
Corporation and RGC, respectively. As a result of the consolidation, the
Company has recorded minority interest of $10,000 as of December 31, 1996.
(l) Reclassifications--Certain amounts for prior years have been
reclassified to conform with the current year financial statement
presentation.
(2) REAL ESTATE UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Real estate under development at December 31, 1996 and 1995 is summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---------------------- ----------------------
AMOUNT UNITS/LOTS AMOUNT UNITS/LOTS
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single-family residences...... $ 7,411,791 79 $ 5,497,852 34
Townhomes..................... 5,178,177 31 6,333,133 21
----------- --- ----------- ---
Net single family residences.. 12,589,968 110 11,830,985 55
Land under development........ 6,917,212 257 13,031,214 223
----------- --- ----------- ---
Total real estate under
development before
investment in joint venture.. 19,507,180 367 24,862,199 278
Investment in joint venture... 2,400,984 --
----------- --- ----------- ---
Total real estate under
development.................. $21,908,164 367 $24,862,199 278
=========== === =========== ===
</TABLE>
Investment in joint venture represents the Company's investment in Mission
Gorge, LLC. In 1996, Mission Gorge, LLC, a California limited liability
company, was formed and the Company transferred its Mission Gorge property to
the joint venture. In connection with the formation, the Curci-Turner Company,
of which a principal is a stockholder of the Company, converted its $2,000,000
note into equity in Mission Gorge, LLC. As a result, Mission Gorge, LLC is
owned by both the Company and the Curci-Turner Company, and each is entitled
to receive 50% of "Net Proceeds" as defined in the operating agreement.
During 1996, the Company recorded an impairment loss on its Pleasant Oaks
Estates project, the Cypress Cove project, and the Summertree Park, Elk Grove
project of $1,014,629, $1,540,972 and $1,911,676, respectively.
24
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The impairment loss on the Pleasant Oaks Estates project is primarily a
result of additional municipal requirements in 1996 which contributed to a
significant delay of the completion of the final units. Additional land
development costs were incurred to satisfy the municipal requirements, and as
a result of the delay, the Company incurred increased project overhead and
interest costs, and was forced to reduce sales prices and raise incentives as
the competition in this market increased.
The impairment loss on the Cypress Cove project is due to the Company
incurring increased production overhead, interest and marketing costs as a
result of a slow down in absorption due to a decreased customer base, and an
increased production period, as the area experienced the impact of inclement
weather conditions in the winter and spring of 1996, including the closure of
a major access road from the San Francisco Bay Area. Additionally, in order to
revitalize the project subsequent to the storms in 1996, the Company increased
sales incentives.
The impairment loss on the Summertree Park, Elk Grove project is primarily a
result of a slower absorption caused by a sagging real estate market in the
Sacramento area. As a result, the Company discontinued the product after the
first phase of production, and began to develop a new product line in 1996,
which the Company plans to open in April 1997. The Company incurred increased
capitalized marketing, production overhead and interest costs as models were
constructed for the new product line. Contributing to additional production
overhead and interest costs relating to the development of the new product,
the carrying costs for the development were further increased as inclement
weather conditions in the area during the winter and spring of 1996 hampered
sales and the development efforts. Additionally, in order to increase the
absorption of the old product line, the Company increased sales incentives.
Development operations in 1996, 1995 and 1994 are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS
----------- ----- ----------- ----- ----------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REAL ESTATE SALES:
Single-family
residences........... $ 6,956,676 40 $12,929,854 61 $14,177,525 87
Townhomes............. 6,760,450 26 4,131,385 15 4,556,000 17
----------- --- ----------- --- ----------- ---
Total Sales......... 13,717,126 66 17,061,239 76 18,733,525 104
COST OF REAL ESTATE
SALES:
Single-family
residences........... 7,005,459 12,591,882 13,929,189
Townhomes............. 6,744,760 4,143,297 4,541,593
Warranty and property
investigation costs.. 399,905 275,966 143,954
Reversal of warranty
reserves............. -- (774,312) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total Cost of Sales. 14,150,124 16,236,833 18,614,736
Recognition of
impairment of real
estate under
development and land
held for investment.... (6,093,475) -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) income from
development operations. $(6,526,473) $ 824,406 $ 118,789
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Reversal of warranty reserves in 1995 is the result of the settlement of a
lawsuit filed against the Company for general damages caused by alleged land
subsidence.
(3) INVESTMENT IN LAND
The Company is deferring the development of the Victorville project in San
Bernardino County, California, and its Mockingbird project, in Riverside
County, California due to market conditions.
25
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The Company regularly reviews the carrying value of its investment in land
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of the asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash
flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company recognizes an
impairment loss.
During 1996, the Company recorded an impairment loss associated with the
Victorville property, which is included as land held for investment, of
$1,626,198, resulting in a net carrying value of $2,976,000. The recognition
of impairment loss was a result of the Company valuing the land based on the
sale of the vacant lots as opposed to the development of the project.
The Company has expensed the holding costs related to these properties,
consisting primarily of property taxes, and debt service on the Victorville
bond liability (Note 5). In addition, as of December 31, 1996, the Company has
a delinquency of $466,759 for the Victorville bond liability and $35,310 for
property taxes. Given the weakness in the Victorville housing market, the
Company has determined that paying these taxes and servicing the nonrecourse
bond liability is not a prudent use of capital.
(4) DEFERRED AND OTHER ASSETS
Included in deferred and other assets is trust deeds receivable. The Trust
deeds receivable at December 31, 1996 and 1995 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OUTSTANDING
BALANCE
INTEREST ------------------
RATE 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Trust deeds receivable.......................... 10%-12% $168,597 $175,666
Less reserve.................................... (50,000) (50,000)
-------- --------
Net trust deeds receivable...................... 118,597 125,666
Other........................................... 215,063 115,464
-------- --------
Deferred and other assets....................... $333,660 $241,130
======== ========
</TABLE>
These trust deeds are collateralized by lots, houses, and condominium units
sold by the Company, and mature from 1997 to 2014.
(5) TRUST DEEDS AND NOTES PAYABLE
Trust deeds and notes payable as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE
-----------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Notes payable to financial institutions, secured by
development projects' trust deeds--variable rates
ranging from prime + 0.5% to prime + 2.0%; maturing
February 1997 through October 2025................... $ 5,011,866 $ 4,682,926
Notes payable to related parties, secured by
development projects' trust deeds-- rates of prime +
1.5% and 12%; maturing January 1998 through December
1999................................................. 9,759,364 7,500,000
Note payable to related parties, unsecured--rates
ranging from prime to 15%; maturing April 1997
through June 1999.................................... 2,769,186 75,000
----------- -----------
Total trust deeds and notes payable................... $17,540,416 $12,257,926
=========== ===========
Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds....... $ 2,336,544 $ 2,336,544
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the Prime rate was 8.25%.
26
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had remaining loan commitments from
banks and a related party of approximately $4,940,000 and $1,820,000,
respectively, which may be drawn down by the Company upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions. The Company continues to seek joint venture partners and
additional financing to fund its operations.
During 1995, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $4,000,000 from
the Curci-Turner Company for the acquisition and development of the Summertree
Park project. In addition to interest, this loan contains a profit sharing
provision which provides that Curci-Turner Company receive 40% of "Net
Proceeds" as defined in the agreement, which is comparable to gross profit. As
of December 31, 1996, the outstanding balance owing on this loan totaled
$3,607,681.
During 1996, the Curci-Turner Company made loans of $1,487,500 and
$2,100,000 to the Company secured by 21 lots and a four unit model complex in
the Montserrat project in Murrieta, California and 20 units in the Cypress
Cove project, respectively. In addition to interest, these loans contain
profit sharing provisions which provide that Curci-Turner Company receive 50%
of "Net Proceeds" as defined in the agreements, which is comparable to gross
profit. As of December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal on these two notes
was $872,500 and $1,579,183, respectively.
During 1996, the Curci-Turner Company made a loan of $3,700,000 to the
Company secured by 41 lots in the Montana Del Lago project in Rancho Santa
Marguerita and 100 lots in the Elysian 2 project. In addition to interest,
this loan contains a profit sharing provision which provides that Curci-Turner
Company receive 33.3% of "Net Proceeds" as defined in the agreement. As of
December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal on this note was $3,700,000.
During 1996, the Curci-Turner Company made an unsecured loan of $1,000,000
to the Company. Additionally, the Company converted its Preferred Stock to
Common Stock and the accrued Preferred Stock dividend due Curci-Turner Company
of $472,645 was exchanged for a note with interest payable at 10%. As of
December 31, 1996, the outstanding principal on these notes was $500,000 and
$472,645, respectively.
During 1996, the Company borrowed $1,900,000 from an officer of the Company.
Additionally, the Company converted its Preferred Stock to Common Stock and
the accrued Preferred Stock dividend due the officer of $581,542 was exchanged
for a note with interest payable at 10%. As of December 31, 1996, the
outstanding principal on these notes was $1,140,000 and $581,542,
respectively.
In March 1997, Montserrat Development Co., LLC, a California limited
liability company, was formed and the Company transferred 24 lots from the
Montserrat project to the entity. In connection with the formation, an officer
of the Company converted a $120,000 note due from the Company into equity in
Montserrat Development Co., LLC. As a result, Montserrat Development Co., LLC
is owned by both the Company and the officer, and each is entitled to receive
99% and 1%, respectively, of "Net Proceeds" as defined in the operating
agreement.
The $2,336,544 Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds (CFD), were
issued by the City of Victorville, California, to finance the construction of
the infrastructure within the District, of which the Company's Victorville
property is a part. The bonds are repaid through a special tax assessment on
the parcels of land within the development. As the amount of the liability is
fixed and determinable and the related assets are subject to a lien, the
liability and corresponding site improvement assets have been reflected in the
financial statements.
During 1996, the Company borrowed additional amounts primarily for the
purposes of financing insurance premiums and other miscellaneous purposes. As
of December 31, 1996, the combined outstanding principal balance was $717,566.
27
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Aggregate future principal payments due on trust deeds payable, notes
payable, and CFD indebtedness are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRINCIPAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, PAYMENTS
----------------------- -----------
<S> <C>
1997........................................................ $ 4,883,605
1998........................................................ 7,261,717
1999........................................................ 4,821,301
2000........................................................ 72,228
2001........................................................ 77,699
Thereafter.................................................. 2,760,410
-----------
Total..................................................... $19,876,960
===========
</TABLE>
During 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company paid interest of $743,401, $862,505
and $304,035 respectively, on loans from related parties.
(6) INCOME TAXES
The deferred income tax assets, resulting from differences between
accounting for financial statements purposes, and tax purposes less valuation
reserves are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Inventory Reserves................................ $ 4,706,000 $ 2,634,000
Warranty Reserves................................. 102,000 52,000
State Net Operating Loss.......................... 1,517,000 1,373,000
Loss Carryback Claim.............................. 457,000 457,000
Federal Operating Loss............................ 4,127,000 3,095,000
------------ -----------
10,909,000 7,611,000
Valuation Reserve................................. (10,909,000) (7,611,000)
------------ -----------
$ -- $ --
============ ===========
</TABLE>
The Company has established a valuation reserve equal to the deferred tax
asset, as realization depends on the Company's ability to generate future
earnings.
During 1995, the Company filed a claim for a refund resulting from the
carryback of losses related to the condemnation of certain property.
The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the
Company's effective rate for 1996, 1995, and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
AMOUNT PRETAX INCOME
--------------------------------- ------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
----------- --------- --------- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statutory rate............ $(3,128,116) $ 174,550 $(553,822) (34)% 34 % (34)%
Utilization of
unrecognized deferred
income tax benefit....... -- (174,550) -- -- (34) --
Limitation of loss
carryforward............. 3,128,116 -- 553,822 34 -- 34
----------- --------- --------- --- --- ---
$ -- $ -- $ -- -- % -- % -- %
=========== ========= ========= === === ===
</TABLE>
28
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 1996, the Corporation had net operating loss
carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately
$12,100,000 and $16,300,000, respectively. For federal and state tax purposes
the net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2007 through 2011, and from
1998 through 2007, respectively.
(7) PREFERRED STOCK
In the third quarter of 1996, the Company paid $319,467 to redeem 189,153
shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock at the redemption price of $1.28 per
share, plus accrued dividends of approximately $0.32 per share, for
shareholders of record on June 7, 1996. The remaining preferred shares
(3,382,215) were converted into Common Stock. In addition, the shareholders
received a promissory note in the amount of the preferred dividends accrued of
$1,054,187, bearing interest at the rate of 10.0% per annum, payable
quarterly. The total number of shares of Common Stock issued for Convertible
Preferred Stock was 4,329,235 shares.
(8) QUALIFIED AND NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has three stock-based compensation plans, which are described
below. In addition, the Company issued 150,000 warrants in 1996 for non-
employee services. The Company applies APB Opinion 25 and related
Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation. Accordingly,
no compensation costs have been recognized for its fixed stock option plans or
issuance of warrants during 1996. The compensation cost that has been charged
against income for its stock incentive plan was $17,164 during 1996. Had
compensation costs for the Company's stock-based compensation plans and
issuance of warrants been determined based on the fair value at the grant
dates for awards issued in 1995 and 1996 under the plans consistent with FASB
Statement 123, the Company's net (loss) income and (loss) income per share
would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
----------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Net (loss) income to common shareholders:
As reported...................................... $(9,402,589) $ 48,938
Pro forma........................................ $(9,519,652) $(49,744)
(Loss) income per share:
As reported...................................... $ (1.28) $ 0.01
Pro forma........................................ $ (1.30) $ (0.01)
</TABLE>
The 1983 Stock Option Plan authorized an aggregate of 596,957 (adjusted for
stock dividends) shares of common stock to be reserved for grant. The 1983
Stock Option Plan expired in September, 1993. Changes in the 1983 Stock
Options Plan are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------------ ------------------ -------------------
WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
------- --------- ------- --------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, beginning
of year................ 324,500 $1.53 325,000 $1.54 453,674 $2.90
Granted................. -- -- --
Exercised............... -- -- --
Canceled................ (40,000) 2.69 (500) 2.50 (128,674) 6.39
------- ----- ------- ----- -------- -----
Outstanding, end of
year................... 284,500 $1.37 324,500 $1.53 325,000 $1.54
======= ===== ======= ===== ======== =====
Exercisable, end of
year................... 237,500 235,500 229,000
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The 1993 Stock Option Plan, (amended by the shareholders May 23, 1996)
authorizes an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock to
be reserved for grant. The options fully vest a year from the date of grant.
Changes in the 1993 Stock Option plan are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
------- --------- ------- --------- ------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, beginning
of year................ 883,250 $0.89 582,000 $0.79 307,500 $0.80
Granted................. 5,000 0.69 305,250 1.09 275,500 0.78
Exercised............... -- (1,500) 0.75 --
Canceled................ (11,000) 0.84 (2,500) 0.75 (1,000) 0.75
------- ------- -------
Outstanding, end of
year................... 877,250 0.89 883,250 0.89 582,000 0.79
======= ======= =======
Exercisable, end of
year................... 872,250 563,000 301,500
======= ======= =======
Available for grant, end
of year................ 621,250 120,250 423,000
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about the outstanding options at
December 31, 1996, from the Company's 1983 and 1993 stock option plans:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
--------------------------------- ---------------------
WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
RANGE OF NUMBER REMAINING AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE
EXERCISE OUTSTANDING CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE EXERCISABLE EXERCISE
PRICES AT 12/31/96 LIFE PRICE AT 12/31/96 PRICE
-------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$0.69 to $0.96.......... 790,000 6.5 years $0.82 768,000 $0.82
$1.00 to $1.25.......... 307,250 6.5 years 1.10 307,250 1.10
$2.50 to $3.00.......... 64,500 1.7 years 2.89 34,500 2.79
--------- --------- ----- --------- -----
$0.69 to $3.00.......... 1,161,750 5.8 years 1.01 1,109,750 0.96
========= ========= ===== ========= =====
</TABLE>
The 1989 Executive Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, (amended by the
shareholders May 23, 1996) authorizes an aggregate of 500,000 (adjusted for
stock dividends) shares of the Company's common stock to be reserved for
awards to key employees of the Company. The stock, once granted to the key
employees, vests at 20 percent a year from the date of grant. The non-vested
shares represent unearned compensation. Changes in the 1989 Executive Long-
Term Stock Incentive plan are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Issued shares, beginning of year................ 261,060 181,660 133,120
Issued.......................................... -- 83,000 51,000
Returned at termination of employment........... (3,680) (3,600) (2,460)
------- ------- -------
Issued shares, end of year...................... 257,380 261,060 181,660
======= ======= =======
Vested, end of year............................. 131,980 83,590 53,135
======= ======= =======
Available for award, end of year................ 242,620 13,940 93,340
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Included as a separate deduction of stockholder's equity is deferred
compensation relating to this plan of $68,655 and $87,937 as of December 31,
1996, and 1995, respectively.
30
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The 1992 Director Stock Option Plan authorizes an aggregate amount of
100,000 shares to be granted. Each year, the directors that are members of the
stock option committee are granted options to buy 7,500 shares at the market
price at the date of grant, exercisable one year after grant, and expire 10
years after the grant date. During 1996, 7,500 shares were granted under this
plan at an exercise price of $0.69 per share, which represents the market
price at the date of grant. At December 31, 1996, no other shares related to
this plan were outstanding.
On May 23, 1996, the Company issued warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of
common stock to a consultant. One-third of the warrants were exercisable
immediately, one-third are exercisable one year after the grant date, and the
remaining one-third are exercisable two years after the grant date. Such
warrants have a $1.00 exercise price and expire 5 years from the grant date.
The weighted-average fair value of the options granted during 1996 and 1995
is $0.55 for the 1993 plan, $0.55 for the 1992 plan, and $0.37 for the
warrants. The fair value of options and warrants granted during 1996 is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions: no dividend yield, expected
volatility of 67 percent, risk free interest rate of 6.5 percent, and an
expected life of 10 years for all options and 5 years for all warrants.
On October 31, 1996, the Company issued warrants to purchase 150,000 shares
of common stock to the minority owner of DMM Development, LLC (see Note 2).
One-third of the warrants were exercisable immediately, one-third are
exercisable one year after the grant date, and the remaining one-third are
exercisable two years after the grant date. Such warrants have a $1.00
exercise price and expire 5 years from the grant date. The market price of
common stock at the date of issuance was less than the exercise price.
Accordingly, no value was ascribed to the warrants.
(9) OTHER INCOME
In 1993, the Company's Oceanside property was taken by the State of
California through eminent domain. The Company received a deposit of probable
compensation of $2,332,000 from the State and a loss of $194,932 was recorded
at that time. In January 1995, a valuation trial was held, and the verdict
entitled the Company to an additional $2,080,900, plus accrued interest. On
March 24, 1995, the Company received $2,280,363 in settlement of this matter,
which was recorded as other income in the first quarter of 1995.
(10) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There are several legal actions and claims pending against the Company.
Based on the advice of legal counsel, management believes that the ultimate
liability, if any, which may result from any of these lawsuits will not
materially affect the financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
The Company has an operating lease with a related party that expires in
2001. Future minimum rent as of December 31, 1996, is $92,096 in 1997 through
2000, and $76,746 in 2001, for a total of $445,130. Rent expense for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $101,721 ($34,951 to a related
party), $82,178 and $87,122, respectively.
31
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(11) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA--(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
------------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales...................... $1,844,278 $2,550,093 $ 2,626,505 $ 6,696,250
Gross loss................. (59,511) (83,087) (4,411,503) (1,972,372)
Net loss................... $ (770,131) $ (831,099) $(5,001,876) $(2,597,236)
========== ========== =========== ===========
Net loss per share......... $ (0.18) $ (0.15) $ (0.54) $ (0.28)
========== ========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
--------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales......................... $3,478,025 $4,263,810 $5,058,756 $4,260,648
Gross profit (loss)........... 133,546 757,953 7,700 (74,793)
Net income (loss)............. $1,802,808 $ 104,800 $ (469,438) $ (924,789)
========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income (loss) per share
(primary).................... $ 0.35 $ 0.00 $ (0.12) $ (0.21)
========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income per share (fully-
diluted)..................... $ 0.19
==========
</TABLE>
During the third and fourth quarter of 1996, the Company recognized
impairment losses for real estate under development and land held for
investment of $4,326,848 and $1,766,627, respectively. The impairment losses
were for the Company's Victorville, Cypress Cove and Elk Grove projects.
During the first quarter of 1995, the Company received $2,280,363 in a
settlement with the State of California, which was recorded as other income.
See Note 9.
During the second quarter of 1995, cost of real estate sales was reduced by
approximately $730,000 resulting from the reversal of warranty reserves
associated with the settlement of a lawsuit filed against the Company for
general damages caused by alleged land subsidence.
32
<PAGE>
CALPROP CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TRUST
DEEDS
WARRANTY RECEIVABLE
----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance January 1, 1994................................. $ 1,791,786 $105,790
Additions charged to operations....................... 143,954 --
Reductions............................................ (436,332) --
----------- --------
Balance December 31, 1994............................... $ 1,499,408 $105,790
Additions charged to operations....................... 275,966 --
Reductions............................................ (1,473,674) (55,790)
----------- --------
Balance December 31, 1995............................... $ 301,700 $ 50,000
Additions charged to operations....................... 399,905 --
Reductions............................................ (440,204) --
----------- --------
Balance December 31, 1996............................... $ 261,401 $ 50,000
=========== ========
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEQUENTIAL
EXHIBIT PAGE
NUMBER DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION NUMBER
------- -------------------- ----------
<C> <S> <C>
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Amendment No.
1 to Form S-1 filed with Securities Exchange Commission
on July 3, 1994 bearing File #33-62516.)
3.2 By-laws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1
filed with Securities Exchange Commission on July 3,
1994 bearing File #33-62516.)
10.1 1983 Calprop Corporation Stock Option Plan (Incorporated
by reference to the Company's Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File No. 2-86872), which became effective
September 30, 1983.)
10.2 1989 Executive Long-Term Stock Incentive Option Plan
(Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-8
Registration Statement (File No. 33-33640), which became
effective March 18, 1991.)
10.3 1992 Directors Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by
reference to the Company's Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File No. 33-57226), which became effective
January 18, 1993.)
10.4 1993 Calprop Corporation Stock Option Plan (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Amendment
No. 1 to Form S-1 filed with Securities Exchange
Commission on July 3, 1993 bearing File #33-62516.)
23 Independent Auditors' Consent
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
34
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CALPROP CORPORATION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
2-86872, 333-15333, 33-33640, 333-15137, 33-57226, 33-62516, 33-88892, and
333-15061 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 19, 1997 appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calprop Corporation for the year ended December
31, 1996.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 19, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 1,224,780
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 0
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 25,945,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 1,224,780
<PP&E> 0
<DEPRECIATION> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 27,533,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,287,184
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 9,224,585
<OTHER-SE> (4,865,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 27,533,378
<SALES> 13,717,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 13,898,914
<CGS> 14,150,124
<TOTAL-COSTS> 23,099,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 2,855,657
<LOSS-PROVISION> 6,093,475
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 217,854
<INCOME-PRETAX> (9,200,342)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (9,200,342)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (9,200,342)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED> (1.28)
</TABLE>
