<PAGE 1>
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549-1004
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission file number 2-7909
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 04-1144610
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
One Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142-9150
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(617) 225-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
None None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Class
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [ x ] NO [ ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Outstanding at
Class of Common Stock March 15, 1996
Common Stock, $25 par value 346,600 shares
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(1)(a) and
(b) of Form 10-K as a wholly-owned subsidiary and is therefore filing this
Form with the reduced disclosure format.
Documents Incorporated by Reference Part in Form 10-K
None Not Applicable
List of Exhibits begins on page 38 of this report.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 2>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
FORM 10-K DECEMBER 31, 1995
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
PAGE
Item 1. Business.............................................. 3
General............................................ 3
Electric Power Supply.............................. 3
New England Power Pool............................. 5
Energy Mix......................................... 5
Regulation......................................... 5
(a) Wholesale Rate Proceedings.................. 5
(b) Rate Settlement Agreement................. 6
(c) Cost Recovery............................... 7
Rate Schedule............................. 7
Purchased Power........................... 7
Conservation and Load Management Programs. 7
Customer Transition Charge............... 7
(d) Electric Industry Restructuring............. 8
(e) Potential Impact of Regulatory
Restructuring........................... 9
Competition........................................ 9
Environmental Matters.............................. 10
Construction and Financing......................... 10
Employees.......................................... 11
Item 2. Properties............................................ 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings..................................... 11
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters................................... 12
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations............................................ 13
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........... 16
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure................... 16
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports
on Form 8-K........................................... 37
Signatures..................................................... 50
<PAGE>
<PAGE 3>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
PART I.
Item 1. Business
General
Cambridge Electric Light Company (the Company) is engaged in the
production, distribution and sale of electricity at retail to approximately
44,500 customers in the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts. The service
territory encompasses a seven square mile area with a population of
approximately 96,000. In addition, the Company sells power for resale to the
New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) and the Town of Belmont, Massachusetts
(Belmont), and sells steam from its electric generating stations at wholesale
to an affiliated company for distribution to customers for space heating and
other purposes.
The Company, which was organized on January 28, 1886 pursuant to a special
act of the legislature of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, operates under
the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU),
which regulates retail rates, accounting, issuance of securities and other
matters. The Company also files its wholesale rates with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC). The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Commonwealth Energy System (System), which, together with its subsidiaries, is
referred to as "the system."
By virtue of its charter, which is unlimited in time, the Company
distributes electricity without direct competition in kind from any privately
or municipally-owned utility. Alternate sources of energy are available to
customers within the service territory. In early 1995, the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, one of the Company's largest customers, completed and
placed into service a natural gas cogeneration facility which will meet
approximately 94% of their power needs. For further information on this
facility refer to the "Customer Transition Charge" section discussion which
follows.
Of the Company's 1995 retail electric unit sales, 11.8% was sold to
residential customers, 81.7% to commercial customers, 5.9% to industrial
customers and 0.6% to municipal and other customers.
Electric Power Supply
The Company owns generating facilities with a total capacity of 112.5 MW,
of which 49.5 MW is used for peaking purposes. The Company relies primarily
on purchased power to meet its energy requirements.
Power purchases for the Company and Commonwealth Electric Company (Common-
wealth Electric), the other wholly-owned electric distribution subsidiary of
the System, are arranged in accordance with their requirements. These
arrangements include purchases from Canal Electric Company (Canal), another
wholly-owned subsidiary of the System. Canal is a wholesale electric
generating company located in Sandwich, Massachusetts and is an important
source of purchased power for the Company. Under long-term contracts, system
entitlements include one-quarter (141.5 MW) of the capacity and energy of
Canal Unit 1 and one-half (290 MW) of the capacity and energy of Canal Unit 2.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 4>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
The Company's entitlements in these units are 28.2 MW and 57.8 MW,
respectively.
Pursuant to a Capacity Acquisition and Disposition Agreement (CADA), Canal
seeks to secure bulk electric power on a single system basis to provide cost
savings for the customers of the Company and Commonwealth Electric. The CADA
has been accepted for filing as an amendment to Canal's FERC rate schedule and
allows Canal to act on behalf of the Company and Commonwealth Electric in the
procurement of additional capacity for one or both companies. The CADA is in
effect for Seabrook 1 and Phases I and II of Hydro-Quebec. Exchange agree-
ments are in place with these utilities whereby, in certain circumstances, it
is possible to exchange capacity so that the mix of power improves the pricing
for dispatch for both the seller and the purchaser. Power contracts are in
place whereby Canal bills or credits the Company and Commonwealth Electric for
the costs or revenues associated with these facilities. The Company and
Commonwealth Electric, in turn, have billed or are billing these charges (net
of revenues from sales) to their customers through rates subject to DPU
approval.
The Company also has equity ownership interests (2 1/2% to 4 1/2%) in
three operating nuclear units located in New England with power entitlements
totaling 67.6 MW. One of the operating nuclear units, located in Wiscasset,
Maine and operated by Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (Maine Yankee), was
experiencing degradation of its steam generator tubes, principally in the form
of circumferential cracking, which until early 1995 was believed to be limited
to a relatively small number of tubes. During a refueling and maintenance
outage that began in early February 1995, Maine Yankee, through the use of new
inspection methods, detected increased degradation involving approximately 60%
of the tubes which was well beyond Maine Yankee's expectations.
After carefully evaluating alternative courses of action to remedy this
situation, Maine Yankee in late May declared it would perform repairs by
sleeving all 17,000 steam generator tubes. Repairs, which cost approximately
$26 million including the Company's share of $1 million, began in June and
were completed in December 1995. The unit was returned to partial service in
January 1996.
In addition, the Company has entitlements of 19.7 MW and 8.1 MW through
Canal's equity ownership in Hydro-Quebec Phase II and joint-ownership in the
Seabrook nuclear unit, respectively.
Additionally, on February 26, 1992, Yankee Atomic Electric Company's Board
of Directors decided to permanently cease power operation at a nuclear unit
located in Rowe, Massachusetts and, in time, decommission the facility. The
Company has a 2% interest in this facility. For further information, refer to
Note 3(e) of Notes to Financial Statements filed under Item 8 of this report.
The Company expects to provide for future peak load plus reserve require-
ments through existing system generation, including purchasing excess capacity
from neighboring utilities. These and other bulk electric power purchases are
necessary in order to fulfill the system's NEPOOL obligation and for Canal to
acquire and deliver electric generating capacity to meet the Company's and
Commonwealth Electric's requirements.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 5>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
New England Power Pool
The Company, together with other electric utility companies in the New
England area, is a member of NEPOOL, which was formed in 1971 to provide for
the joint planning and operation of electric systems throughout New England.
NEPOOL operates a centralized dispatching facility to ensure reliability
of service and to dispatch the most economically available generating units of
member companies to fulfill the region's energy requirements. This concept is
accomplished through the use of computers to monitor and forecast load
requirements.
The Company and the System's other electric subsidiaries are also members
of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC), an advisory organization,
which includes the major power systems in New England and New York plus the
provinces of Ontario and New Brunswick in Canada. The NPCC establishes cri-
teria and standards for reliability and serves as a vehicle for coordination
in the planning and operation of these systems.
The reserve requirements used by NEPOOL participants in planning future
additions are determined by NEPOOL to meet the reliability criteria recom-
mended by the NPCC. The system estimates that, during the next ten years,
reserve requirements so determined will be in the range of 20% to 25% of peak
load.
Energy Mix
The Company's energy mix, including purchased power, was as follows:
1995 1994 1993
Oil 23% 31% 43%
Nuclear 36 43 44
Natural gas 40 25 12
Hydro 1 1 1
Total 100% 100% 100%
The Company's energy mix shifted during 1994 from oil to natural gas and
other types of generation due to the availability of capacity from an
independent power producing facility and an effort to reduce its reliance on
oil. The lower oil component in 1995 reflects Canal Unit 1 being off-line for
the first seven months of the year and an additional outage period of nearly
one month during the fourth quarter. In addition to power purchases, the
Company is actively pursuing sales of certain available capacity to utilities
in and outside the New England region.
Regulation
(a) Wholesale Rate Proceedings
The Company provides power supply and transmission services to its FERC-
jurisdictional wholesale customers. The Company requires FERC approval to
change its wholesale rates, including those to the Municipal Light Department
of the Town of Belmont, Massachusetts (Belmont), a "partial requirements"
<PAGE>
<PAGE 6>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
customer since 1986. Since February 1993 Belmont has taken power supply
service under a FERC approved Net Requirements Power Supply Agreement.
In 1993, the Company and Belmont began negotiations for a new transmission
service agreement. The negotiations were not successful. On June 29, 1994
the Company filed for approval with the FERC a new transmission service
agreement for service to Belmont. The FERC accepted the rates effective
January 25, 1995, subject to refund. At the same time, an investigation was
opened by the FERC to determine the reasonableness of both the existing
transmission tariff rates to Belmont and the proposed transmission service
agreement with Belmont. Both Belmont and FERC staff intervened in the
investigation. The Company filed its case with the FERC on October 25, 1994
and evidentiary hearings were held in March 1995.
An Initial Decision (ID) of the Presiding Administrative Law Judge was
issued on September 14, 1995. In the ID the Administrative Law Judge found
that the Company's existing transmission tariff rates were just and
reasonable. The Administrative Law Judge identified a number of revisions to
the filed transmission service agreement which effectively reduced the rates
to Belmont. In October 1995, the parties filed briefs on exceptions to the
Administrative Law Judge's ID. The Company awaits final FERC action on this
investigation.
(b) Rate Settlement Agreement
In May 1995, the DPU approved settlement proposals sponsored jointly by
the Company, Commonwealth Electric and the Attorney General of Massachusetts
which resolved issues related to cost of service, rates, accounting matters
and generating unit performance reviews.
The Company's settlement agreement: (1) implemented a $1.5 million refund
to the Company's customers through its Fuel Charge during the third and fourth
quarters of 1995 including its share of excess deferred tax reserves related
to Seabrook Unit 1 refunded in May 1995 to the Company by Canal Electric; (2)
allows the Company to defer certain long-term purchased power and transmission
capacity costs in excess of the amount of such capacity costs currently
included in the Company's base rates up to an annual amount of $2 million for
recovery in its next general retail base rate case; (3) prohibits the Company
from seeking recovery of costs it incurred in obtaining cost savings through a
work force reduction and restructuring, totaling approximately $400,000; and
(4) includes the DPU's withdrawal of all related requests, appeals, motions or
other issues raised by parties regarding certain generating unit performance
reviews.
The system's management is encouraged by the support provided through the
Office of the Attorney General and believes that these settlements will
eliminate the need for potentially costly litigation and regulatory
proceedings and, by moderating rate impacts and enabling the system to remain
competitive in a changing environment, the settlements are in the best
interest of the system and its customers and shareholders.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 7>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
(c) Cost Recovery
Rate Schedule
The Company files a FC rate schedule, subject to DPU regulation, under
which the Company is allowed current recovery from retail customers of costs
of fuel used in electric generation and a substantial portion of purchased
power, demand and transmission costs. This schedule requires the quarterly
computation and DPU approval of a FC decimal based on forecasts of fuel,
electricity purchased for resale and transmission costs and billed unit sales
for each period. To the extent that collections under the rate schedule do
not match actual costs for a given calendar quarter, an appropriate adjustment
is reflected in the calculation of the Company's decimal for the next calendar
quarter.
Purchased Power
The Company has long-term contracts for the purchase of electricity from
various sources. Generally, these contracts are for fixed periods and require
that the Company pay a demand charge for its capacity entitlement and an
energy charge to cover the cost of fuel. The Company collects a portion of
these capacity-related purchased power costs associated with certain long-term
power and transmission agreements through base rates as approved by the DPU.
Revenues collected through base rates are generally designed to reimburse
the Company for all costs of operation other than fuel, the energy portion of
purchased power, transmission and C&LM costs while providing a fair return on
capital invested in the business. However, as a result of a DPU-mandated
recovery mechanism for capacity-related costs associated with certain long-
term purchased power contracts, the Company, because it collects through base
rates a portion of its capacity-related purchased power costs associated with
certain long-term power arrangements, has experienced a revenue excess or
shortfall when unit sales and/or the costs recoverable in base rates vary from
test-period levels. This issue, which has had a significant impact on the
Company's net income, was addressed in a settlement agreement approved by the
DPU in May 1995 which permits deferral of up to $2 million for these capacity-
related purchased power costs. (Refer to the "Rate Settlement Agreement"
section for additional details.)
Conservation and Load Management Programs
The Company has implemented a variety of cost-effective conservation and
load management (C&LM) programs for its customers which are designed to reduce
future energy use. On June 30, 1993, the DPU issued an order in Phase I of a
C&LM cost recovery filing made by the Company and Commonwealth Electric which
allows the recovery of "lost base revenues" from electric customers. The
recovery of lost base revenues is employed by the DPU to encourage effective
implementation of C&LM programs. These and other C&LM costs are recovered
through a Conservation Charge decimal. The KWH savings that are realized as a
result of the successful implementation of C&LM programs serve as the basis
for determining lost base revenues.
Customer Transition Charge
On September 29, 1995, the DPU issued a ruling largely approving four rate
<PAGE>
<PAGE 8>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
tariffs, including a Customer Transition Charge (CTC), that were filed by the
Company on March 15, 1995 following the completion by the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) of a 19 MW natural gas-fired cogeneration
facility that will meet approximately 94% of MIT's power, heating and cooling
requirements. The CTC will protect remaining customers from paying certain
costs, often referred to as stranded investment costs, that were incurred in
the event that the Company's largest customers discontinue full service, yet
still remain connected for back-up and other services. These costs include
long-term power contracts entered into to meet projected energy requirements,
investments in substations, underground and overhead lines and current and
future decommissioning costs associated with nuclear plants. This ruling is
believed to be the first retail stranded cost charge approved nationally and
follows the DPU restructuring order (discussed below) which endorsed, in
principle, the recovery of stranded investment costs.
MIT appealed the CTC ruling to the FERC and the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court (SJC). On February 29, 1996, the FERC denied MIT's appeal
seeking relief from paying the CTC. The FERC ruled that the CTC does not
discriminate against MIT as a qualifying facility and that stranded costs are
to be resolved at the state level. The appeal before the SJC is still pending
but the FERC's action will be a factor that the SJC will consider.
Through the CTC, the Company will initially recover 75% of net stranded
investment costs as calculated in its proposal. The Company's other rates
include a Supplemental Service Rate, a Standby Service Rate and a Maintenance
Service Rate each of which were approved with only minor changes. The Company
is encouraged by the DPU's position on recovery of stranded investment costs
and expects to address recovery of the remaining 25% in its restructuring
filing.
(d) Electric Industry Restructuring
On August 16, 1995, the DPU issued an order calling for the restructuring
of the electric utility industry in Massachusetts. The stated purpose of the
restructuring effort is to allow customers more flexibility in choosing their
electric service provider and to develop an efficient industry structure and
regulatory framework that minimizes long-term costs to consumers while
maintaining the safety and reliability of electric services with a minimum
impact on the environment. The electric utility industry will ultimately be
functionally separated into three segments to help meet this objective:
generation, transmission and distribution.
In February 1996, certain utilities submitted required proposals detailing
how they plan to move into a competitive market structure. Since that time,
the DPU has given notice of a generic proceeding that will focus on many of
the policy issues raised in the DPU's original order. Each of the state's
electric utilities, together with other interested parties, will participate
in this proceeding. The purpose of this generic proceeding is to establish a
set of rules governing the restructuring of the electric industry in
Massachusetts. These generic rules would set the basis for the DPU's review
of each of the utility-specific restructuring proposals. The proposal to be
submitted jointly by the Company and Commonwealth Electric (the Companies) is
due in September 1996. Management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome
of these proceedings.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 9>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
On February 15, 1996, in response to the DPU's initial restructuring
order, the Companies announced one element of the proposal entitled
"Competitive Challenge" in which the Companies would voluntarily put their
power capacity entitlements (1,140 MW) to a market test in an effort to
develop a competitive market whereby customers would have the flexibility of
choosing their electric supplier. The proposal calls for the auctioning in a
competitive market of entitlements in all twenty-one contracts, including
contracts held by the Companies involving the System's generating subsidiary
Canal Electric. The proposal provides for total recovery of the difference
between the current market value of the Companies' power contracts and their
original unavoidable costs. This difference, considered to be a stranded
cost, would be recovered through a non-bypassable access charge paid over an
appropriate time period by all customers in the Companies' service areas.
The auction approach has received initial positive reviews from the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources and the Office of
the Attorney General.
(e) Potential Impact of Regulatory Restructuring
Based on the current regulatory framework, the Company accounts for the
economic effects of regulation in accordance with the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects
of Certain Types of Regulation." The Company has established various
regulatory assets in cases where the DPU and/or the FERC have permitted or are
expected to permit recovery of specific costs over time. The regulatory
assets amounted to $7.8 million (5.7% of total assets) as of December 31,
1995. Similarly, the regulatory liabilities established by the Company are
required to be refunded to customers over time. In March 1995, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of." SFAS No.
121 imposes stricter criteria for regulatory assets by requiring that such
assets be probable of future recovery at each balance sheet date. Management
does not expect that the effects of SFAS No. 121, which the Company adopted on
January 1, 1996, will have a material impact on its financial position or
results of operations. However, this conclusion may change in the future as
changes are made in the current regulatory framework pursuant to the
aforementioned electric utility restructuring order issued by the DPU.
Competition
The Company continues to develop and implement strategies that deal with
the increasingly competitive environment facing the electric business. The
inherently high cost of providing energy services in the Northeast has placed
the region at a competitive disadvantage as more customers begin to explore
alternative energy supply options. Many state and federal government agencies
are considering implementing programs under which utility and non-utility
generators can sell electricity to customers of other utilities without regard
to previously closed franchise service areas. In 1994, the DPU began an
inquiry into incentive ratemaking and in February 1995 opened an investigation
into electric industry restructuring that led to the aforementioned
restructuring order.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 10>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
In March 1994, the Company was successful in negotiating a seven-year
service agreement with Harvard University, whose sales in 1995 and 1994
accounted for approximately 9.4% and 8.5%, respectively, of the Company's
total unit sales for those years.
As part of its commitment to meet the demands of a new, competitive
electric market, the Company began marketing products specially designed for
the residential and commercial customer. Products offered to residential
customers through the Company include carbon monoxide detectors and a home
safety kit containing tests for: lead in paint and water; radiation leaks from
microwave ovens; drinking water safety; carbon monoxide; and radon gas.
Products offered to smaller commercial customers include: an energy
consumption monitor that will monitor two devices simultaneously, such as
refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment and at the same time provide
information about energy consumption and cost; a voltage scanner for sensitive
equipment; electric power surge protectors; and power-plug loggers that
monitor the KWH usage on a particular piece of electrical equipment.
For larger commercial or industrial customers, enhanced services focus on
information systems, utilizing real-time monitoring software so customers are
educated about their usage patterns, electrotechnologies in manufacturing
processes so customers can increase profits and competitive advantages in the
marketplace, engineering services, energy audit services, maintenance
management programs, and demand-side management programs.
In addition, the Company is actively involved with the Chamber of Commerce
in each operating district as well as local and state economic development
offices. Information on foreign trade zones, tax incentive programs and
financial and lending institutions is provided to businesses to attract and
encourage relocation or expansion in the Company's region.
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to laws and regulations administered by federal,
state and local authorities relating to the quality of the environment. These
laws and regulations affect, among other things, the siting and operation of
generating facilities, and will continue to impact future operations, capital
costs and construction schedules. Air emission regulations require the use of
more costly lower-sulphur content fuels (0.5% maximum in the case of the
Company's facilities, which are located in a populated urban area) in electric
generating facilities. The amendments to the federal Clean Air Act enacted in
1990 will impose restrictions on air emissions, and have a particular impact
on the cost of electric generating operations. Regulations enacted by the
state of Massachusetts required a reduction in sulphur dioxide emission rates
effective December 31, 1994. These regulations may also result in an increase
in the cost of power purchased from others. The Company recovers its cost of
fuel and purchased power through its FC or base rates.
Construction and Financing
Information concerning the Company's construction and financing programs
is contained in Note 3(a) of the Notes to Financial Statements filed under
Item 8 of this report.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 11>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Employees
The Company has 155 regular employees, 115 employees (74%) are represented
by the Utility Workers' Union of America, A.F.L.-C.I.O. The existing
collective bargaining agreement expires September 1, 1998. Employee relations
have generally been satisfactory.
Item 2. Properties
The Company owns and operates two steam generating plants and two gas
turbine units located in Cambridge with a total capability of 112.5 MW
together with an integrated system of distribution lines and substations.
At December 31, 1995, the Company's electric transmission and distribution
system consisted of 93 pole miles of overhead lines, 691 cable miles of
underground line, 217 substations and 45,059 active customer meters.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company is an intervenor in an appeal at the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court (SJC) filed by MIT of a decision by the DPU approving a
customer transition charge (CTC) that allows the Company to recover certain
stranded investment costs. MIT filed its appeal at the SJC on October 19,
1995, and requests that the SJC set aside the DPU's decision approving the
Company's CTC. MIT alleges that the CTC is contrary to the requirements of
the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, that the DPU's
establishment of the CTC constitutes retroactive ratemaking and is in excess
of the DPU's statutory authority, and that the level of stranded investment
costs to be recovered through the CTC is unsupported by the record. The
parties to this proceeding are MIT, the DPU and the Company. The Company
intends to present legal and policy arguments in support of the DPU's
September 29, 1995 decision. The position taken by the Company will be
consistent with its position in MIT's appeal at the FERC. Management is
encouraged by the favorable decision rendered by the FERC. For additional
information refer to "Cost Recovery" section in Item 1 of this report.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 12>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
PART II.
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters
(a) Principal Market
Not applicable. The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Commonwealth Energy System.
(b) Number of Stockholders at December 31, 1995
One
(c) Frequency and Amount of Dividends Declared in 1995 and 1994
1995 1994
Per Share Per Share
Declaration Date Amount Declaration Date Amount
January 25, 1995 $ 2.90 January 21, 1994 $ 2.59
April 28, 1995 1.15 April 25, 1994 3.10
July 24, 1995 3.00 July 18, 1994 2.00
November 14, 1995 7.50 October 24, 1994 10.00
$14.55 $17.69
Reference is made to Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements
filed under Item 8 of this report for the restriction against the
payment of cash dividends.
(d) Future dividends may vary depending on the Company's earnings and
capital requirements as well as financial and other conditions
existing at that time.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 13>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of certain significant factors which have
affected operating revenues, expenses and net income during the periods
included in the accompanying statements of income and is presented to
facilitate an understanding of the results of operations. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Financial Statements filed
under Item 8 of this report.
A summary of the period to period changes in the principal items included
in the accompanying statements of income for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1994 and unit sales for these periods is shown below:
Years Ended Years Ended
December 31, December 31,
1995 and 1994 1994 and 1993
Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Electric Operating Revenues $(4 906) (3.8)% $ 2 187 1.7%
Operating Expenses:
Fuel used in electric production (125) (4.1) 644 27.1
Electricity purchased for resale (3 223) (4.4) (1 464) (2.0)
Transmission (345) (4.8) (513) (6.6)
Other operation and maintenance (282) (1.2) (1 899) (7.2)
Depreciation 97 2.4 235 6.2
Taxes -
Federal and state income (537) (16.5) 1 810 124.7
Local property and other 114 3.0 195 5.5
(4 301) (3.6) (992) (0.8)
Operating Income (605) (6.0) 3 179 46.2
Other Income 4 1.6 3 1.2
Income Before Interest Charges (601) (5.8) 3 182 44.6
Interest Charges 203 5.0 41 1.0
Net Income $ (804) (12.9) $ 3 141 101.3
Unit Sales (MWH)
Retail 9 320 0.7 (14 748) (1.1)
Sales for resale (160 059) (52.7) 2 831 0.9
Total unit sales (150 739) (9.3) (11 917) (0.7)
<PAGE>
<PAGE 14>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Unit Sales
The following is a summary of unit sales and customers for the periods
indicated:
Years Ended December 31,
1995 1994 1993
% %
Change Change
Unit Sales (MWH):
Residential 157 355 0.9 155 986 0.2 155 638
Commercial 1 089 187 1.3 1 074 726 1.5 1 091 365
Industrial 78 063 (7.6) 84 471 2.1 82 706
Municipal and other 8 014 (1.3) 8 116 (2.7) 8 338
Total retail 1 332 619 0.7 1 323 299 (1.1) 1 338 047
Wholesale 143 565 (52.7) 303 624 0.9 300 793
Total 1 476 184 (9.3) 1 626 923 (0.7) 1 638 840
Customers:
Residential 37 686 (0.2) 37 758 - 37 752
Commercial 6 458 1.0 6 393 0.9 6 339
Industrial 57 (1.7) 58 (1.7) 59
Municipal and other 302 1.7 297 2.1 291
Total 44 503 - 44 506 0.1 44 441
For 1995, the Company's total unit sales decreased 9.3% and reflects a
significant decrease in wholesale sales to NEPOOL due to changes in the
Company's capacity needs. Retail unit sales increased slightly and reflect
moderate increases in the commercial and residential sectors.
In 1994, despite a slight increase in retail customers, primarily
commercial, retail unit sales decreased 1.1% due primarily to a decline in
sales to a large municipal customer. This decrease also reflects a lower
demand for power from residential, commercial and municipal customers during
the fourth quarter of 1994 due to milder weather conditions compared to both
normal and the fourth quarter of 1993.
Operating Revenues
Operating revenues for 1995 declined $4.9 million (3.8%) due primarily to
decreases in wholesale unit sales, electricity purchased for resale ($3.2
million), C&LM charges ($764,000), transmission charges ($345,000), and fuel
costs ($125,000) offset, in part, by a small increase in retail unit sales.
Also impacting the change in operating revenues was the implementation of a
$1.5 million rate refund pursuant to the May 1995 settlement agreement
discussed in Item 1.
The recovery of lost base revenues through the operation of a CC decimal
is allowed by the DPU to encourage effective implementation of C&LM programs.
To the extent that current costs associated with C&LM programs increase or
decrease from period to period based on customer participation, a
corresponding change will occur in revenue.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 15>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Operating revenues increased $2.2 million or 1.7% in 1994 due primarily to
new base rates for the Company which became effective June 1, 1993 offset, in
part, by a lower level C&LM program costs ($1.7 million), a decline in
purchased power of $1.5 million and the lower level of total unit sales.
As a result of a DPU mandated recovery mechanism implemented in 1993 for
capacity-related costs associated with certain long-term purchased power
contracts, the Company has experienced a revenue excess or shortfall when unit
sales and/or the costs recoverable in base rates vary from test-period levels.
This issue, which has had a significant impact on net income, was addressed in
a settlement agreement approved by the DPU in May 1995 (refer to the "Cost
Recovery" section in Item 1 of this report for additional details). During
1995 and 1994, the Company overrecovered approximately $900,000 and $3.2
million, respectively, resulting in an increase to net income of approximately
$545,000 and $2 million, respectively.
The following is an analysis of revenue components for the years 1995,
1994 and 1993:
Years Ended December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
% %
Change Change
Electric revenues:
Costs recovered in Fuel
or Conservation Charge $ 47 907 (8.9) $ 52 610 (13.5) $ 60 808
Certain power costs
recovered in base rates 31 727 0.8 31 481 19.7 26 294
Other revenue recoveries (*) 43 720 (1.0) 44 169 13.3 38 971
Total revenues $123 354 (3.8) $128 260 1.7 $126 073
(*) Includes sales for resale and other base rate revenues.
Electricity Purchased For Resale, Transmission and Fuel
To satisfy demand requirements and provide required reserve capacity, the
Company purchases power on a long and short-term basis through entitlements
pursuant to power contracts with other New England and Canadian utilities,
Qualifying Facilities and other non-utility generators through a competitive
bidding process that is regulated by the DPU. The Company supplements these
sources with its own generating capacity.
During 1995, purchased power, transmission and fuel costs decreased $3.7
million or 4.5% due primarily to a $3.2 million reduction in purchased power
costs which reflects the unavailability of Canal Electric Company's (Canal)
Unit 1 due to a combination of scheduled maintenance and other repairs which
kept the unit out of service from January until August 1995. In addition, a
nuclear unit remained out of service for most of 1995 while undergoing
extensive generator repairs.
Purchased power, transmission and fuel costs decreased $1.3 million (1.6%)
in 1994 due primarily to decreased sales to a large municipal customer.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 16>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Other Operation and Maintenance
During 1995, other operation decreased $887,000 (4.1%) due primarily to a
decline in liability insurance ($856,000) due to adjustments to insurance
accruals that reflect better than anticipated experience, lower C&LM costs
($764,000) and a decline in the provision for bad debts reflecting improved
collection experience ($234,000). This was offset, in part, by higher costs
for labor ($669,000) and postretirement benefits ($366,000). Maintenance
costs increased $605,000 due primarily to repairs to the Company's Kendall and
Blackstone generating units.
Other operation expense decreased $1.7 million in 1994 due primarily to
the aforementioned lower level of C&LM program costs, lower payroll costs
($508,000) and affiliated services company charges ($228,000) that reflect the
impact of a second quarter 1993 work force reduction. These decreases were
partially offset by higher insurance and benefits costs ($405,000) and an
increase in the provision for bad debts ($304,000). Maintenance costs
decreased $197,000 in 1994 due mainly to a lower level of labor-related costs
reflecting the work force reduction.
Depreciation and Taxes
Depreciation expense increased 2.4% and 6.2% in 1995 and 1994,
respectively, due to higher levels of depreciable property, plant and
equipment. Federal and state income taxes decreased during 1995 by
approximately 17% due to a lower level of pretax income. A higher level of
pretax income contributed to the 1994 increase of $1.8 million. Local
property and other taxes increased in 1995 due to higher rates and assessments
along with a slight increase in payroll-related taxes ($64,000). Lower
property assessments were an offsetting factor to the 1994 increase of 5.5%.
Other Income and Interest Charges
There were no significant changes to other income during 1995 and 1994.
Interest charges during 1995 increased 5% due to a higher level of short-term
borrowings and higher short-term interest rates (6.1% in 1995 versus 4.3% in
1994) offset, somewhat, by an increase in the debt component of allowance for
funds used during construction (AFUDC) ($82,000).
Despite a lower average level of short-term borrowings, total interest
charges increased slightly in 1994 due to higher short-term rates offset, in
part, by an increase in the debt component of AFUDC reflecting an increase in
construction-work-in-progress during 1994.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Company's financial statements required by this item are filed
herewith on pages 17 through 36 of this report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 17>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of Cambridge Electric Light Company:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC
LIGHT COMPANY (a Massachusetts corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of
Commonwealth Energy System) as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial statements and
schedules referred to below are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Cambridge Electric Light
Company as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed in the index to
financial statements and schedules are presented for purposes of complying
with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the
basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, fairly state, in all material respects, the financial
data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 16, 1996.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 18>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
PART II.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance Sheets at December 31, 1995 and 1994
Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
Statements of Retained Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993
Notes to Financial Statements
PART IV.
SCHEDULES
I Investments in, Equity in Earnings of, and Dividends Received
From Related Parties for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994
and 1993
II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended December 31,
1995, 1994 and 1993
SCHEDULES OMITTED
All other schedules are not submitted because they are not applicable or
not required or because the required information is included in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
Financial statements of 50% or less owned companies accounted for by the
equity method have been omitted because they do not, considered
individually, constitute a significant subsidiary.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 19>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994
ASSETS
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at original cost $156 925 $148 855
Less - Accumulated depreciation 58 839 55 618
98 086 93 237
Add - Construction work in progress 1 225 3 541
99 311 96 778
INVESTMENTS
Equity in nuclear electric power companies 9 224 9 164
Other 5 5
9 229 9 169
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash 239 376
Accounts receivable -
Affiliated companies 2 140 917
Customers, less reserves of $490,000 in 1995
and $471,000 in 1994 10 534 9 835
Unbilled revenues 1 769 3 088
Inventories, at average cost -
Materials and supplies 511 577
Electric production fuel oil 796 804
Prepaid property taxes 1 690 1 702
Other 872 730
18 551 18 029
DEFERRED CHARGES
Yankee Atomic purchased power contract 4 504 8 163
Other 5 447 5 570
9 951 13 733
$137 042 $137 709
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 20>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
CAPITALIZATION
Common Equity -
Common stock, $25 par value -
Authorized and outstanding -
346,600 shares in 1995 and 1994,
wholly-owned by Commonwealth
Energy System (Parent) $ 8 665 $ 8 665
Amounts paid in excess of par value 27 953 27 953
Retained earnings 7 561 7 166
44 179 43 784
Long-term debt, including premiums, less
current sinking fund requirements and
maturing debt 21 865 42 027
66 044 85 811
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Interim Financing -
Notes payable to banks 2 675 2 175
Advances from affiliates 2 425 550
Maturing long-term debt 20 000 -
25 100 2 725
Other Current Liabilities -
Current sinking fund requirements 160 160
Accounts payable -
Affiliated companies 3 787 4 212
Other 8 870 8 359
Accrued taxes -
Local property and other 1 690 1 711
Income 731 667
Accrued interest 973 994
Other 1 272 1 878
17 483 17 981
42 583 20 706
DEFERRED CREDITS
Accumulated deferred income taxes 13 882 12 639
Unamortized investment tax credits 1 941 2 035
Yankee Atomic purchased power contract 4 504 8 163
Other 8 088 8 355
28 415 31 192
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
$137 042 $137 709
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 21>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES $123 354 $128 260 $126 073
OPERATING EXPENSES
Fuel used in electric production 2 895 3 020 2 376
Electricity purchased for resale 69 415 72 638 74 102
Transmission 6 861 7 206 7 719
Other operation 20 617 21 504 23 206
Maintenance 3 404 2 799 2 996
Depreciation 4 127 4 030 3 795
Taxes -
Income 2 725 3 262 1 452
Local property 3 017 2 968 2 683
Payroll and other 835 770 860
113 896 118 197 119 189
OPERATING INCOME 9 458 10 063 6 884
OTHER INCOME 258 254 251
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES 9 716 10 317 7 135
INTEREST CHARGES
Long-term debt 3 776 3 788 3 797
Other interest charges 638 341 246
Allowance for borrowed funds used
during construction (136) (54) (9)
4 278 4 075 4 034
NET INCOME $ 5 438 $ 6 242 $ 3 101
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 22>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at beginning of year $ 7 166 $ 7 056 $ 6 156
Add (Deduct):
Net income 5 438 6 242 3 101
Cash dividends on common stock (5 043) (6 132) (2 201)
Balance at end of year $ 7 561 $ 7 166 $ 7 056
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 23>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 5 438 $ 6 242 $ 3 101
Effects of noncash items -
Depreciation and amortization 4 258 4 323 3 989
Deferred income taxes 1 067 917 1 081
Investment tax credits (94) (95) (95)
Earnings from corporate joint ventures (1 111) (1 189) (1 069)
Dividends from corporate joint ventures 1 051 1 084 1 099
Change in working capital, exclusive
of cash and interim financing -
Accounts receivable and unbilled
revenues (603) 1 209 (3 013)
Prepaid taxes 55 991 700
Accounts payable and other (609) 1 683 2 362
Deferred postretirement benefit and
pension costs (503) (1 019) (1 284)
All other operating items 109 (1 967) (412)
Net cash provided by operating activities 9 058 12 179 6 459
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property, plant and
equipment (exclusive of AFUDC) (6 229) (6 499) (4 270)
Allowance for borrowed funds used
during construction (136) (54) (9)
Net cash used for investing activities (6 365) (6 553) (4 279)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payment of dividends (5 043) (6 132) (2 201)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings, net 500 175 500
Proceeds from (payment of)
affiliate borrowings 1 875 (755) 1 305
Retirement of long-term debt through
sinking funds (162) (162) (162)
Net cash used for financing activities (2 830) (6 874) (558)
Change in cash (137) (1 248) 1 622
Cash at beginning of period 376 1 624 2
Cash at end of period $ 239 $ 376 $ 1 624
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid (net of capitalized
amounts) $ 3 934 $ 3 743 $ 3 863
Income taxes paid (refunded) $ 2 061 $ 2 102 $ (44)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 24>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) General Information
Cambridge Electric Light Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Commonwealth Energy System (the System). The System is the
parent company and, together with its subsidiaries, is collectively referred
to as "the system." The System is an exempt public utility holding company
under the provisions of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 with
investments in four operating public utility companies located in central,
eastern and southeastern Massachusetts and several non-regulated companies.
The Company's operations are involved in the production and sale of elec-
tricity to approximately 44,500 customers in the city of Cambridge,
Massachusetts. The service territory encompasses a seven square-mile area
with a population of approximately 96,000. In addition, the Company sells
power for resale to the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) and the Town of
Belmont, Massachusetts (Belmont), and sells steam from its electric generating
stations at wholesale to an affiliated company for distribution to customers
for space heating and other purposes.
The Company has 155 regular employees, 115 (74%) of whom are represented
by a single collective bargaining unit. Employee relations have generally
been satisfactory.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Principles of Accounting
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain prior year amounts are reclassified from time to time to conform
with the presentation used in the current year's financial statements.
(b) Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The Company is regulated as to rates, accounting and other matters by
various authorities including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU).
Based on the current regulatory framework, the Company accounts for the
economic effects of regulation in accordance with the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects
of Certain Types of Regulation." The Company has established various
regulatory assets in cases where the DPU and/or the FERC have permitted or are
expected to permit recovery of specific costs over time. Similarly, the
regulatory liabilities established by the Company are required to be refunded
to customers over time. In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of." SFAS No. 121 imposes stricter
criteria for regulatory assets by requiring that such assets be probable of
<PAGE>
<PAGE 25>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
future recovery at each balance sheet date. Management does not expect that
the effects of SFAS No. 121, which the Company adopted on January 1, 1996,
will have a material impact on its financial position or results of
operations. However, this conclusion may change in the future as changes are
made in the current regulatory framework pursuant to an electric utility
restructuring order issued by the DPU in August 1995.
The principal regulatory assets included in deferred charges at
December 31, 1995 and 1994 were as follows:
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
Yankee Atomic unrecovered plant
and decommissioning costs $ 4 504 $ 8 163
Postretirement benefit costs
including pensions 2 807 2 304
Other 498 763
$ 7 809 $11 230
As of December 31, 1995, $5.7 million of the Company's regulatory assets
and all of its regulatory liabilities are reflected in rates charged to
customers over a weighted average period of approximately 5 years. The
Company intends to request and expects to receive approval for recovery of its
remaining regulatory assets in future rate proceedings.
The regulatory liabilities, reflected in the accompanying balance sheets
and related to deferred income taxes, were $3.2 million and $3.7 million at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
(c) Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions between the Company and other system companies include
purchases and sales of electricity, including purchases from Canal Electric
Company (Canal), an affiliate wholesale electric generating company. Other
Canal transactions include costs relating to the abandonment of Seabrook 2 and
the recovery of a portion of Seabrook 1 pre-commercial operation costs. In
addition, payments for management, accounting, data processing and other
services are made to an affiliate, COM/Energy Services Company. Transactions
with other system companies are subject to review by the DPU.
The Company's operating expenses include the following major intercompany
transactions for the periods indicated:
Purchased Power
Purchased Power and Transmission
Period Ended Purchased Power and Transmission From Canal
December 31, Canal Units Seabrook 1 as Agent
(Dollars in Thousands)
1995 $10 148 $ 6 973 $ 1 465
1994 11 650 8 622 9 780
1993 12 637 9 141 10 896
The costs for the Canal and Seabrook 1 units are included in the long-term
obligation table listed in Note 2(b). In addition, the Company purchased
<PAGE>
<PAGE 26>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
natural gas from an affiliate, Commonwealth Gas Company, totaling $1,969,000,
$2,158,000 and $1,485,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
(d) Operating Revenues
Customers are billed for their use of electricity on a cycle basis
throughout the month. To reflect revenues in the proper period, the estimated
amount of unbilled sales revenue is recorded each month.
The Company is generally permitted to bill customers currently for costs
associated with purchased power and transmission, fuel used in electric
production and conservation and load management (C&LM) costs through adjust-
ment clauses. Amounts recoverable under the adjustment clauses are subject to
review and adjustment by the DPU.
The amount of such costs incurred by the Company but not yet reflected in
customers' bills is recorded as unbilled revenues. However, as of December
31, 1995, the Company had overcollected $348,000 which is reflected as a
liability in the balance sheet. This overcollected fuel-related amount is
returned to customers in subsequent months. There was no overcollected amount
at December 31, 1994.
(e) Depreciation
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method at rates intended
to amortize the original cost and the estimated cost of removal less salvage
of properties over their estimated economic lives. The average composite
depreciation rate was 2.72% in 1995, 2.76% in 1994 and 2.66% in 1993.
(f) Maintenance
Expenditures for repairs of property and replacement and renewal of items
determined to be less than units of property are charged to maintenance
expense. Additions, replacements and renewals of property considered to be
units of property are charged to the appropriate plant accounts. Upon
retirement, accumulated depreciation is charged with the original cost of
property units and the cost of removal less salvage.
(g) Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
Under applicable rate-making practices, the Company is permitted to
include an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) as an element
of its depreciable property costs. This allowance is based on the amount of
construction work in progress that is not included in the rate base on which
the Company earns a return. An amount equal to the AFUDC capitalized in the
current period is reflected in the accompanying statements of income.
While AFUDC does not provide funds currently, these amounts are recover-
able in revenues over the service life of the constructed property. The
amount of AFUDC recorded was at a weighted average rate of 7.75% in 1995, 6.5%
in 1994 and 3.5% in 1993.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 27>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
(3) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Financing and Construction Programs
The Company is engaged in a continuous construction program presently
estimated at $27.2 million for the five-year period 1996 through 2000. Of
that amount, $6.3 million is estimated for 1996. The program is subject to
periodic review and revision because of factors such as changes in business
conditions, rates of customer growth, effects of inflation, maintenance of
reliable and safe service, equipment delivery schedules, licensing delays,
availability and cost of capital and environmental factors. The Company
expects to finance these expenditures on an interim basis with internally
generated funds and short-term borrowings which are ultimately expected to be
repaid with the proceeds from sales of long-term debt and equity securities.
(b) Power Contracts
The Company has long-term contracts for the purchase of electricity from
various sources. Generally, these contracts are for fixed periods and require
payment of a demand charge for the capacity entitlement and an energy charge
to cover the cost of fuel. Pertinent information with respect to life-of-the-
unit contracts for power from operating nuclear units in which the Company has
an equity ownership (Yankee Nuclear Units) is as follows:
Connecticut Maine Vermont
Yankee Yankee Yankee
(Dollars in Thousands)
Equity Ownership (%) 4.50 4.00 2.50
Plant Entitlement (%) 4.50 3.59 2.25
Plant Capability (MW) 560.0 870.0 496.0
Company Entitlement (MW) 25.2 31.2 11.2
Contract Expiration Date 2007 2008 2012
1993 Actual Cost ($) 10 016 7 050 4 076
1994 Actual Cost ($) 8 902 6 250 3 660
1995 Actual Cost ($) 9 498 7 376 4 003
Decommissioning cost estimate (100%) ($) 385 523 361 212 347 383
Company's decommissioning cost ($) 17 349 12 968 7 816
Market value of assets (100%) ($) 180 388 142 116 141 300
Company's market value of assets ($) 8 117 5 102 3 179
The Company pays its share of decommissioning expense to each of the
operators of these nuclear facilities as a cost of electricity purchased for
resale.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 28>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
The Company also has long-term contracts to purchase capacity from other
generating facilities. Information relative to these contracts is as follows:
Range of
Contract
Expiration Entitlement 1995 1994 1993
Dates % MW Cost Cost Cost
(Dollars in Thousands)
Type of Unit
Cogenerating 2011 17.2 24.5 $14 680 $14 808 $ 4 979
Oil 2001-2009 * 86.1 10 148 11 650 12 637
Nuclear 2026 0.7 8.1 6 919 8 622 9 141
Total 118.7 $31 747 $35 080 $26 757
(*) Includes contracts to power from two oil-fired units with capacity
entitlements of 4.99% and 9.97%.
Costs pursuant to these contracts are included in electricity purchased
for resale in the accompanying statements of income and are recoverable in
revenue.
The estimated aggregate obligations under the life-of-the-unit contracts
for capacity from the operating Yankee Nuclear Units and other long-term
purchased power obligations, including the Canal and Seabrook 1 units, in
effect for the five years subsequent to 1995 are as follows:
Long-Term
Equity-Owned Purchased
Nuclear Units Power Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
1996 $21 195 $37 927 $59 122
1997 21 130 40 027 61 157
1998 23 596 41 241 64 837
1999 23 153 41 561 64 714
2000 23 813 42 139 65 952
In addition, the Company incurred costs for purchases from the New England
Power Pool of $14,185,000, $6,241,000 and $11,039,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.
(c) Price-Anderson Act
Under the Price-Anderson Act (the Act), owners of nuclear power plants
have the benefit of approximately $8.9 billion of public liability coverage
which would compensate the public for valid bodily injury and property loss on
a no fault basis in the event of an accident at a commercial nuclear power
plant. Under the provisions of the Act, each nuclear reactor with an
operating license can be assessed up to $79.3 million per nuclear incident
with a maximum assessment of $10 million per incident within one calendar
year. Nuclear plant owners have initiated insurance programs designed to help
cover liability claims relating to property damage, decontamination,
replacement power and business interruption costs for participating utilities
arising from a nuclear incident.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 29>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
The Company has an equity ownership interest in four nuclear generating
facilities. The operators of these units maintain nuclear insurance coverage
(on behalf of the owners of the facilities) with Nuclear Electric Insurance
Limited (NEIL II and NEIL III) and the combined American Nuclear
Insurers/Mutual Atomic Energy Liability Underwriters (ANI). NEIL II provides
$1.4 billion of property, boiler, machinery and decontamination insurance
coverage, including accidental premature decommissioning insurance in the
amount of the shortfall in the Decommissioning Trust Fund, in excess of the
underlying $500 million policy. NEIL III provides $850 million of additional
insurance coverage. All companies insured with NEIL are subject to
retroactive assessments if losses exceed the accumulated funds available. ANI
provides $500 million of "all risk" property damage, boiler, machinery and
decontamination insurance. An additional $200 million of primary financial
protection coverage is provided for off-site bodily injury or property damage
caused by a nuclear incident. ANI also provides secondary financial
protection liability insurance which currently provides $8.7 billion of
retrospective insurance premium benefits in accordance with the provisions of
the Act. Additional coverage provided by ANI includes tort liability
protection arising out of radiation injury claims by nuclear workers and
injury or property damage caused by the transportation or shipment of nuclear
materials or waste.
Based on its various ownership interests in the four nuclear generating
facilities, the Company's retrospective premium could be as high as $1.3
million yearly or a cumulative total of $12.3 million, exclusive of the effect
of inflation indexing (at five-year intervals) and a 5% surcharge ($4 million)
in the event that total public liability claims from a nuclear incident exceed
the funds available to pay such claims.
(d) Guarantee Agreement
In connection with its investment in Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company,
the Company has guaranteed its pro-rata portion of that company's nuclear fuel
financing. At December 31, 1995, the Company's portion amounted to $800,000.
(e) Yankee Atomic Nuclear Power Plant
In 1992, Yankee Atomic Electric Company (Yankee Atomic) permanently
discontinued power operation and began the decommissioning of the Yankee
Nuclear Power Station (the plant). At December 31, 1995, the Company's 2%
investment in Yankee Atomic was $464,000. The Company's estimated decom-
missioning costs include its unrecovered share of all costs associated with
the shutdown of the plant, recovery of its plant investment, and decom-
missioning and closing the plant. The most recent cost estimate to
permanently shut down the plant is approximately $225.2 million at December
31, 1995. The Company's share of this liability is $4.5 million and is
reflected in the accompanying balance sheets as a liability and corresponding
regulatory asset. The market value of the Company's share of assets in the
plant's decommissioning fund at December 31, 1995 is approximately $2.1
million.
(f) Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to laws and regulations administered by federal,
state and local authorities relating to the quality of the environment. These
<PAGE>
<PAGE 30>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
laws and regulations affect, among other things, the siting and operation of
electric generating and transmission facilities and can require the installa-
tion of expensive air and water pollution control equipment. These regula-
tions have had an impact on the Company's operations in the past and will
continue to have an impact on future operations, capital costs and construc-
tion schedules of major facilities.
(4) Income Taxes
For financial reporting purposes, the Company provides federal and state
income taxes on a separate-return basis. However, for federal income tax
purposes, the Company's taxable income and deductions are included in the
consolidated income tax return of the System and it makes tax payments or
receives refunds on the basis of its tax attributes in the tax return in
accordance with applicable regulations.
The following is a summary of the Company's provisions for income taxes
for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993:
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
Federal
Current $ 1 397 $ 1 976 $ 326
Deferred 991 805 973
Investment tax credits (94) (95) (95)
2 294 2 686 1 204
State
Current 355 464 140
Deferred 174 157 195
529 621 335
2 823 3 307 1 539
Amortization of regulatory liability
relating to deferred income taxes (98) (45) (87)
$ 2 725 $ 3 262 $ 1 452
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected
to reverse.
Accumulated deferred income taxes consisted of the following in 1995 and
1994:
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
Liabilities
Property-related $16 263 $15 144
All other 2 345 2 168
18 608 17 312
Assets
Investment tax credits 1 253 1 313
Pension plan 761 732
Regulatory liability 1 128 1 192
All other 935 1 109
4 077 4 346
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net $14 531 $12 966
<PAGE>
<PAGE 31>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
The net year-end deferred income tax liability above includes a current
deferred tax liability of $648,000 and $327,000 in 1995 and 1994, respec-
tively, which are included in accrued income taxes in the accompanying balance
sheets.
The total income tax provision set forth previously represents 33% in
1995, 34% in 1994 and 32% in 1993 of income before such taxes. The following
table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate to these percentages:
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
Federal statutory rate 35% 35% 35%
Federal income tax expense at statutory levels $2 857 $3 326 $1 594
Increase (Decrease) from statutory levels:
State tax net of federal tax benefit 343 404 218
Tax versus book depreciation 2 39 27
Amortization of excess deferred reserves (98) (14) (87)
Amortization of investment tax credits (94) (95) (96)
Reversals of capitalized expenses (14) (100) (14)
Dividend received deduction (272) (291) (264)
Other 1 (7) 74
$2 725 $3 262 $ 1 452
Effective federal income tax rate 33% 34% 32%
(5) Employee Benefit Plans
(a) Pension
The Company has a noncontributory pension plan covering substantially all
regular employees who have attained the age of 21 and have completed one year
of service. Pension benefits are based on an employee's years of service and
compensation. The Company makes monthly contributions to the plan consistent
with the funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974.
Components of pension expense and related assumptions to develop pension
expense were as follows:
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
Service cost $ 484 $ 560 $ 459
Interest cost 1 924 1 732 1 646
Return on plan assets - (gain)/loss (5 388) 392 (3 175)
Net amortization and deferral 3 672 (1 901) 1 781
Total pension expense 692 783 711
Transfers to affiliated companies, net 439 404 400
Less: Amounts capitalized and deferred 243 386 232
Net pension expense $ 888 $ 801 $ 879
Discount rate 8.50% 7.25% 8.50%
Assumed rate of return 9.00 8.50 8.50
Rate of increase in future compensation 5.00 4.50 5.50
<PAGE>
<PAGE 32>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Pension expense reflects the use of the projected unit credit method which
is also the actuarial cost method used in determining future funding of the
plan. The Company, in accordance with current ratemaking, is deferring the
difference between pension contribution, which is reflected in base rates, and
pension expense, recognized pursuant to SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting
for Pensions." The funded status of the Company's pension plan (using a
measurement date of December 31) is as follows:
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
Accumulated benefit obligation:
Vested $ (19 638) $ (16 519)
Nonvested (2 093) (1 871)
$ (21 731) $ (18 390)
Projected benefit obligation $ (26 053) $ (22 343)
Plan assets at fair market value 26 361 21 931
Projected benefit obligation
(greater) less than plan assets 308 (412)
Unamortized transition obligation 825 962
Unrecognized prior service cost 1 194 1 314
Unrecognized gain (4 019) (3 418)
Accrued pension liability $ (1 692) $ (1 554)
The following actuarial assumptions were used in determining the plan's
year-end funded status:
1995 1994
Discount rate 7.25% 8.50%
Rate of increase in future compensation 4.25 5.00
Plan assets consist primarily of fixed-income and equity securities.
Fluctuations in the fair market value of plan assets will affect pension
expense in future years.
(b) Other Postretirement Benefits
Historically, the Company provided postretirement health care and life
insurance benefits to eligible retired employees. Employees became eligible
for these benefits if their age plus years of service for the Company or
another subsidiary of the System at retirement equaled 75 or more. However,
as of January 1, 1993, the Company eliminated postretirement health care
benefits for those non-bargaining employees who were less than 40 years of age
or had less than 12 years of service at that date. Under certain
circumstances, eligible employees are required to make contributions for
postretirement benefits.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting
for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" as of January 1, 1993 and the
cumulative effect of implementation of SFAS No. 106 was approximately $10
million which is being amortized over 20 years. Prior to 1993, the cost of
postretirement benefits was recognized as benefits were paid.
The Company makes contributions to various voluntary employees' benefi-
ciary association (VEBA) trusts that were established pursuant to section
<PAGE>
<PAGE 33>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). The Company also makes
contributions to a subaccount of its pension plan pursuant to section 401(h)
of the Code to satisfy a portion of its postretirement benefit obligation.
The Company contributed approximately $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $1.1
million to these trusts during 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 include the following components and related
assumptions:
1995 1994 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
Service cost $ 164 $ 198 $ 201
Interest cost 817 784 839
Return on plan assets (521) (14) (74)
Amortization of transition obligation
over 20 years 498 497 498
Net amortization and deferral 337 (94) (7)
Total postretirement benefit cost 1 295 1 371 1 457
Transfer from affiliated companies, net 579 603 586
Less: Amounts capitalized and deferred 458 863 1 268
Net postretirement benefit cost $1 416 $1 111 $ 775
Discount rate 8.50% 7.25% 8.50%
Assumed rate of return 9.00 8.50 8.50
Rate of increase in future compensation 5.00 4.50 4.50
The funded status of the Company's postretirement benefit plan using a
measurement date of December 31, 1995 and 1994 is as follows:
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees $ (6 219) $ (5 990)
Fully eligible active plan participants (1 720) (1 358)
Other active plan participants (3 463) (3 147)
(11 402) (10 495)
Plan assets at fair market value 2 973 1 681
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
greater than plan assets (8 429) (8 814)
Unamortized transition obligation 8 458 8 956
Unrecognized gain (29) (142)
$ - $ -
The following actuarial assumptions were used in determining the plan's
estimated accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) and funded
status for 1995 and 1994:
1995 1994
Discount rate 7.25% 8.50%
Rate of increase in future compensation 4.25 5.00
Medicare part B premiums 12.20 12.30
Medical care 8.00 8.50
Dental care 5.00 5.00
<PAGE>
<PAGE 34>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
The above rates, with the exception of the dental rate which remains
constant, decrease to five percent in the year 2007 and remain at that level
thereafter. A one percent change in the medical trend rate would have a
$133,000 impact on the Company's annual expense and would change the APBO by
approximately $1.4 million.
Plan assets consist primarily of fixed-income and equity securities.
Fluctuations in the fair market value of plan assets will affect postretire-
ment benefit expense in future years.
Effective with its June 1, 1993 rate order from the DPU, the Company was
allowed to recover its SFAS No. 106 expense in base rates over a four-year
phase-in period with carrying costs on the deferred balance. At December 31,
1995 and 1994, the Company's deferral amounted to approximately $2.2 million
and $1.8 million, respectively.
(c) Savings Plan
The Company has an Employees Savings Plan that provides for Company
contributions equal to contributions by eligible employees of up to four
percent of each employee's compensation rate. Effective January 1, 1993, the
rate was increased to five percent for those employees no longer eligible for
postretirement health benefits. The Company's contribution was $317,000 in
1995, $325,000 in 1994 and $321,000 in 1993.
(6) Interim Financing and Long-Term Debt
(a) Notes Payable to Banks
The Company and other system companies maintain both committed and
uncommitted lines of credit for the short-term financing of their construction
programs and other corporate purposes. As of December 31, 1995, system
companies had $80 million of committed lines of credit that will expire at
varying intervals in 1996. These lines are normally renewed upon expiration
and require annual fees of up to .1875% of the individual line. At December
31, 1995, the system's uncommitted lines of credit totaled $70 million.
Interest rates on the Company's outstanding borrowings generally are at an
adjusted money market rate and averaged 6.1% and 4.3% in 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Notes payable to banks totaled $2,675,000 and $2,175,000 at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
(b) Advances from Affiliates
Notes payable to the System totaled $2,425,000 and $410,000 at December
31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. These notes are written for a term of up to
11 months and 29 days. Interest is at the prime rate and is adjusted for
changes in that rate during the term of the notes. The rate averaged 8.8% and
7.3% in 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The Company is a member of the COM/Energy Money Pool (the Pool), an
arrangement among the subsidiaries of the System, whereby short-term cash
surpluses are used to help meet the short-term borrowing needs of the utility
subsidiaries. In general, lenders to the Pool receive a higher rate of return
than they otherwise would on such investments, while borrowers pay a lower
<PAGE>
<PAGE 35>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
interest rate than those available from banks. Interest rates on the out-
standing borrowings are based on the monthly average rate the Company would
otherwise have to pay banks, less one-half the difference between that rate
and the monthly average U.S. Treasury Bill weekly auction rate. The borrow-
ings are for a period of less than one year and are payable upon demand.
Rates on these borrowings averaged 5.8% and 4.3% in 1995 and 1994, respective-
ly. The Company had no notes payable to the Pool at December 31, 1995. Notes
payable to the Pool totaled $140,000 at December 31, 1994.
(c) Long-Term Debt Maturities and Retirements
Long-term debt outstanding, exclusive of current maturities, current
sinking fund requirements and related premiums, is as follows:
Original Balance December 31,
Issue 1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
7-Year Notes - 9.97%, due 1996 $20 000 $ - $20 000
7-Year Notes - 8.04%, due 1999 10 000 10 000 10 000
15-Year Notes - 8.7%, due 2007 5 000 5 000 5 000
30-Year Notes -
Series C, 6 1/4%, due 1997 6 000 4 260 4 320
Series D, 7 3/4%, due 2002 5 000 2 600 2 700
$21 860 $42 020
Under the terms of its Indenture of Trust, the Company is required to make
periodic sinking fund payments for retirement of outstanding long-term debt.
The payments and balances of maturing debt issues for the five years
subsequent to December 31, 1995 are as follows:
Sinking Fund Maturing
Year Payments Debt Issues Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
1996 $160 $20 000 $20 160
1997 100 4 260 4 360
1998 100 - 100
1999 100 10 000 10 100
2000 100 100 200
(d) Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of certain financial instruments included in the accompany-
ing balance sheets as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 is as follows:
1995 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Value Value Value Value
Long-Term Debt $42 025 $43 656 $42 187 $41 966
<PAGE>
<PAGE 36>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
The carrying amount of cash, notes payable to banks and advances to/from
affiliates approximates the fair value because of the short maturity of these
financial instruments.
The estimated fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market
prices of the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered for debt
with the same remaining maturity. The fair values shown above do not purport
to represent the amounts at which those obligations would be settled.
(7) Dividend Restriction
At December 31, 1995, approximately $5,402,000 of retained earnings was
restricted against the payment of cash dividends by terms of term loans and
note agreements securing long-term debt. As of the same date, retained
earnings also included approximately $4,227,000 representing the Company's
equity in undistributed earnings of the nuclear companies.
(8) Lease Obligations
The Company leases equipment and office space under arrangements that are
classified as operating leases. These lease agreements are for terms of one
year or longer. Leases currently in effect contain no provisions that
prohibit the Company from entering into future lease agreements or obliga-
tions.
Future minimum lease payments, by period and in the aggregate, of noncanc-
elable operating leases consisted of the following at December 31, 1995:
Operating Leases
(Dollars in Thousands)
1996 $ 1 268
1997 1 019
1998 975
1999 975
2000 976
Beyond 2000 2 763
Total future minimum lease payments $ 7 976
Total rent expense for all operating leases, except those with terms of a
month or less, amounted to $1,374,000 in 1995, $1,484,000 in 1994 and
$1,577,000 in 1993. There were no contingent rentals and no sublease rentals
for the years 1995, 1994 and 1993.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 37>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
PART V.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) 1. Index to Financial Statements
Financial statements and notes thereto of the Company together with
the Report of Independent Public Accountants, are filed under Item 8
of this report and listed on the Index to Financial Statements and
Schedules (page 18).
(a) 2. Index to Financial Statement Schedules
Filed herewith at page(s) indicated -
Schedule I - Investments in, Equity in Earnings of, and Dividends
Received From Related Parties - Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994
and 1993 (pages 46-48).
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts - Years Ended December
31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 (page 49).
(a) 3. Exhibits:
Notes to Exhibits -
a. Unless otherwise designated, the exhibits listed below are
incorporated by reference to the appropriate exhibit numbers and the
Securities and Exchange Commission file numbers indicated in
parentheses.
b. The following is a glossary of Commonwealth Energy System and
subsidiary companies' acronyms that are used throughout the following
Exhibit Index:
CES.....................Commonwealth Energy System
CE......................Commonwealth Electric Company
CEL.....................Cambridge Electric Light Company
CEC.....................Canal Electric Company
CG......................Commonwealth Gas Company
NBGEL...................New Bedford Gas and Edison Light Company
<PAGE>
<PAGE 38>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
Exhibit Index
Exhibit 3. Articles of incorporation and by-laws.
3.1 Articles of incorporation of CEL (Exhibit 1 to the CEL Form 10-K for
1990, File No.2-7909).
3.2 By-laws of CEL, as amended (Exhibit 2 to the CEL Form 10-K for 1990,
File No.2-7909).
Exhibit 4. Instruments defining the rights of security holders; including
indentures.
Indenture of Trust or Supplemental Indenture of Trust.
4.1.1 Original Indenture on Form S-1 (April 1949) (Exhibit 7(a), File
No. 2-7909).
4.1.2 Third Supplemental on Form 10-K (1984) (Exhibit 1, File No. 2-
7909).
4.1.3 Fourth Supplemental on Form 10-K (1984) (Exhibit 2, File No. 2-
7909).
4.1.4 Sixth Supplemental on Form 10-Q (June 1989) (Exhibit 1, File No.
2-7909).
4.1.5 Seventh Supplemental on Form 10-Q (June 1992) (Exhibit 1, File No.
2-7909).
Exhibit 10. Material Contracts.
10.1 Power Contracts.
10.1.1 Power Contract between CEC and CEL dated December 1, 1965 (Exhibit
13(a)(1) to the CEC Form S-1, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.2 Contract between CEC and NBGEL and CEL, affiliated companies, for
the sale for specified amounts of electricity from CEC Unit 2 dated
January 12, 1976 (Exhibit 7 to the CES Form 10-K for 1985, File No.
1-7316).
10.1.3 Power Contract, as amended to February 28, 1990, superseding the
Power Contract dated September 1, 1986 and amendment dated June 1,
1988, between CEC (seller) and CE and CEL (purchasers) for seller's
entire share of the Net Unit Capability of Seabrook 1 and related
energy produced and other provisions (Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form
10-Q (March 1990), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.4 Termination Supplement between CEC, CE and CEL RE: Seabrook Unit 2
dated December 8, 1986 (Exhibit 3 to the CEC Form 10-K for 1986,
File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5 Agreement for Joint-Ownership, Construction and Operation of the
New Hampshire Nuclear Units (Seabrook) between CE, Public Service
Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) and others dated May 1, 1973 and
filed by CE as Exhibit 13(N) on Form S-1 dated October 1973, File
No. 2-49013, and as amended below:
<PAGE>
<PAGE 39>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.1.5.1 First through Fifth Amendments to 10.1.5 dated May 24, 1974, June
21, 1974, September 25, 1975, October 25, 1974 and January 31,
1975, respectively (Exhibit 13(m) to CE's Form S-1, (November 7,
1975), File No. 2-54995).
10.1.5.2 Sixth through Eleventh Amendments to 10.1.5 dated April 18, 1979,
April 18, 1979, April 25, 1979, June 8, 1979, October 11, 1979 and
December 15, 1979, respectively (Refiled as Exhibit 1 to the CEC
Form 10-K for 1989, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.3 Twelfth through Fourteenth Amendments to 10.1.5 dated May 16, 1980,
December 31, 1980 and June 1, 1982, respectively (Refiled as
Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 to the CE 1992 Form 10-K), File No. 2-7749).
10.1.5.4 Fifteenth and Sixteenth Amendment to 10.1.5 dated April 27, 1984
and June 15, 1984, respectively (Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(June 1984), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.5 Seventeenth Amendment to 10.1.5 dated March 8, 1985 (Exhibit 1 to
the CEC Form 10-Q (March 1985), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.6 Eighteenth Amendment to 10.1.5 dated March 14, 1986 (Exhibit 1 to
the CEC Form 10-Q (March 1986), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.7 Nineteenth Amendment to 10.1.5 dated May 1, 1986 (Exhibit 1 to the
CEC Form 10-Q (June 1986), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.8 Twentieth Amendment to 10.1.5 dated September 19, 1986 (Exhibit 1
to the CEC Form 10-K for 1986, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.9 Twenty-First Amendment to 10.1.5 dated November 12, 1987 (Exhibit 1
to the CEC Form 10-K for 1989, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.5.10 Twenty-Second Amendment and Settlement Agreement to 10.1.5 both
dated January 13, 1989, (Exhibit 4 to the CEC Form 10-K for 1988,
File No. 2-30057).
10.1.6 Resolutions proposed by Merrill Lynch Capital Markets and adopted
by the Joint-Owners of the Seabrook Nuclear Project regarding
Project financing, dated May 14, 1984 (Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form
10-Q (March 1984), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.7 Interim Agreement to Preserve and Protect the Assets of and
Investment in Seabrook by and between CEC, PSNH and other
participants, dated April 27, 1984 (Exhibit 2 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(June 1984), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.8 Agreement for Seabrook Project Disbursing Agent by and among CEC,
PSNH and other participants establishing Yankee Atomic Electric
Company as the disbursing agent under the Joint-Ownership
Agreement, dated May 23, 1984, (Exhibit 4 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(June 1984), File No. 2-30057).
<PAGE>
<PAGE 40>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.1.8.1 First Amendment dated March 8, 1985 to 10.1.8 (Exhibit 2 to the CEC
Form 10-Q (March 1985), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.8.2 Second through Fifth Amendments dated May 20, 1985, June 18, 1985,
January 2, 1986 and November 12, 1987, respectively, to 10.1.8
(Exhibit 4 to the CEC Form 10-K for 1987, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.9 Capacity Acquisition Agreement between CEC, CEL and CE dated
September 25, 1980 (Exhibit 1 to the 1991 CEC Form 10-K, File
No. 2-30057).
10.1.9.1 Supplement to 10.1.9 consisting of three Capacity Acquisition
Commitments each dated May 7, 1987, concerning Phases I and II of
the Hydro-Quebec Project and electricity acquired from Connecticut
Light and Power Company (Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September
1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.9.2 Supplements to 10.1.9 consisting of two Capacity Acquisition
Commitments each dated October 31, 1988, concerning electricity
acquired from Western Massachusetts Electric Company and/or
Connecticut Light and Power Company for periods ranging from
November 1, 1988 to October 31, 1994 (Exhibit 2 to the CEC Form
10-Q (September 1989), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.9.3 Amendment to 10.1.9 as amended and restated June 1, 1993,
henceforth referred to as the Capacity Acquisition and Disposition
Agreement, whereby CEC, as agent, in addition to acquiring power
may also sell bulk electric power which the Company and/or CE owns
or otherwise has the right to sell (Exhibit 1 to CE's Form 10-Q
(September 1993), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.10 Power Contract between Yankee Atomic Electric Company and CEL,
dated June 30, 1959, as amended April 1, 1975 (Exhibit 1 to the CEL
Form 10-K, File No. 2-7909).
10.1.10.1 Second, Third and Fourth Amendments to 10.1.10 as amended October
1, 1980, April 1, 1985 and May 6, 1988, respectively (Exhibit 2 to
the CEL Form 10-Q (June 1988), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.10.2 Fifth and Sixth Amendments to 10.1.10 as amended June 26, 1989 and
July 1, 1989, respectively (Exhibit 1 to the CEL Form 10-Q
(September 1989), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.11 Power Contract between Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company and
CEL dated July 1, 1964 (Exhibit 13-K1 to the CES Form S-1, (April
1967) File No. 2-25597).
10.1.11.1 Additional Power Contract to 10.1.11 providing for extension on the
contract term dated April 30, 1984 (Exhibit 5 to the CEL Form 10-Q
(June 1984), File No. 2-7909).
<PAGE>
<PAGE 41>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.1.11.2 Second Supplementary Power Contract to 10.1.11 providing for
decommissioning financing dated April 30, 1984 (Exhibit 6 to the
CEL Form 10-Q (June 1984), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.12 Power Contract between CEL and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corporation dated February 1, 1968 (Exhibit 3 to the CEL 1984 Form
10-K, File No. 2-7909).
10.1.12.1 First Amendment (Section 7) and Second Amendment (decommissioning
financing) to 10.1.12 as amended June 1, 1972 and April 15, 1983,
respectively (Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, to the CEL Form 10-Q
(June 1984), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.12.2 Third and Fourth Amendments to 10.1.12 as amended April 1, 1985 and
June 1, 1985, respectively (Exhibit 1 and 2 to the CEL Form 10-Q
(June 1986) File No. 2-7909).
10.1.12.3 Fifth and Sixth Amendments to 10.1.12 both as amended May 6, 1988
(Exhibit 1 to the CEL Form 10-Q (June 1988), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.12.4 Seventh Amendment to 10.1.12 as amended June 15, 1989 (Exhibit 2 to
the CEL Form 10-Q (September 1989), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.12.5 Additional Power Contract between CEL and Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corporation providing for decommissioning financing and
contract extension dated February 1, 1984 (Refiled as Exhibit 1 to
the 1993 CEL Form 10-K, File No. 2-7909).
10.1.13 Power Contract between Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company and CEL
dated May 20, 1968 (Exhibit 5 to the CES Form S-7, File No. 2-
38372).
10.1.13.1 First Amendment (decommissioning financing) and Second Amendment
(supplementary payments) to 10.1.13 as amended March 1, 1984 and
January 1, 1984, respectively (Exhibits 3 and 4 to the CEL Form
10-Q (June 1984), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.13.2 Third Amendment to 10.1.13 as amended October 1, 1984 (Exhibit 1 to
the CEL Form 10-Q (September 1984), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.14 Participation Agreement between Maine Electric Power Company and
CEL and/or NBGEL for the construction of a 345 KV transmission line
between Wiscasset, Maine and Mactaquac, New Brunswick, Canada and
for the purchase of base and peaking capacity from the New
Brunswick Electric Power Commission, dated June 20, 1969 (Exhibit
13 to the CES Form 10-K for 1984, File No. 1-7316).
10.1.14.1 Supplement Amending 10.1.14, as amended June 24, 1970 (Exhibit 8 to
the CES Form S-7, Amendment No. 1, File No. 2-38372).
10.1.15 Service Agreement for Non-Firm Transmission Service between Boston
Edison Company and CEL dated July 5, 1984 (Exhibit 4 to the CEL
1984 Form 10-K, File No. 2-7909).
<PAGE>
<PAGE 42>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.1.16 Power Exchange Agreement by and between Boston Edison Company and
CEL dated December 1, 1984 (Exhibit 5 to the CEL 1984 Form 10-K,
File No. 2-7909).
10.1.17 Agreement, dated September 1, 1985, With Respect To Amendment of
Agreement With Respect To Use Of Quebec Interconnection, dated
December 1, 1981, among certain New England Power Pool (NEPOOL)
utilities to include Phase II facilities in the definition of
"Project" (Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1985), File
No. 2-30057).
10.1.17.1 Amendatory Agreement No. 3 to 10.1.17, as amended June 1, 1990
(Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1990), File No. 2-
30057).
10.1.18 Preliminary Quebec Interconnection Support Agreement - Phase II
among certain NEPOOL utilities, dated June 1,1984 (Exhibit 6 to the
CE Form 10-Q (June 1984), File No. 2-7749).
10.1.18.1 First, Second and Third Amendments to 10.1.18 as amended March 1,
1985, January 1, 1986 and March 1, 1987, respectively (Exhibit 1 to
the CEC Form 10-Q (March 1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.18.2 Fourth and Eighth Amendments to 10.1.18 as amended July 1, 1987 and
August 1, 1988, respectively (Exhibit 3 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(September 1988), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.18.3 Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Amendments to 10.1.18 as amended October
15, 1987, December 15, 1987 and March 1, 1988, respectively
(Exhibit 1 to the CEC Form 10-Q (June 1988), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.18.4 Ninth and Tenth Amendments to 10.1.18 as amended November 1, 1988
and January 15, 1989, respectively (Exhibit 2 to the CEC Form 10-K
for 1988, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.18.5 Eleventh Amendment to 10.1.18 as amended November 1, 1989 (Exhibit
4 to the CEC Form 10-K for 1989, File No. 2-30057).
10.1.18.6 Twelfth Amendment to 10.1.18 as amended April 1, 1990 (Exhibit 1 to
the CEC Form 10-Q (June 1990), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.19 Agreement to Preliminary Quebec Interconnection Support Agreement -
Phase II among PSNH, New England Power Company, Boston Edison
Company and CEC whereby PSNH assigns a portion of its interests
under the original Agreement to the other three parties, dated
October 1, 1987 (Exhibit 2 to the CEC 1987 Form 10-K, File No.
2-30057).
10.1.20 Phase II Equity Funding Agreement for New England Hydro-
Transmission Electric Company, Inc. (New England Hydro
(Massachusetts) between New England Hydro and certain NEPOOL
utilities, dated June 1, 1985 (Exhibit 2 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(September 1985), File No. 2-30057).
<PAGE>
<PAGE 43>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.1.21 Phase II Equity Funding Agreement for New England Hydro-
Transmission Corporation (New Hampshire Hydro) between New
Hampshire Hydro and certain NEPOOL utilities, dated June 1, 1985
(Exhibit 3 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1985), File No.
2-30057).
10.1.21.1 Amendment No. 1 to 10.1.21 as amended May 1, 1986 (Exhibit 6 to the
CEC Form 10-Q (March 1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.21.2 Amendment No. 2 to 10.1.21 as amended September 1, 1987 (Exhibit 3
to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.22 Phase II Massachusetts Transmission Facilities Support Agreement
dated June 1, 1985, refiled as a single agreement incorporating
Amendments 1 through 7 dated May 1, 1986 through January 1, 1989,
respectively, between New England Hydro-Transmission Electric
Company, Inc. (New England Hydro) and certain NEPOOL utilities
(Exhibit 2 the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1990), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.23 Phase II New Hampshire Transmission Facilities Support Agreement
dated June 1, 1985, refiled as a single agreement incorporating
Amendments 1 through 8 dated May 1, 1986 through January 1, 1990,
respectively, between New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation
(New Hampshire Hydro) and certain NEPOOL utilities (Exhibit 3 to
the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1990), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.24 Phase II New England Power AC Facilities Support Agreement between
New England Power and certain NEPOOL utilities, dated June 1, 1985
(Exhibit 6 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1985), File No.
2-30057).
10.1.24.1 Amendments Nos. 1 and 2 to 10.1.24 as amended May 1, 1986 and
February 1, 1987, respectively (Exhibit 5 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(March 1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.24.2 Amendments Nos. 3 and 4 to 10.1.24 as amended June 1, 1987 and
September 1, 1987, respectively (Exhibit 5 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(September 1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.25 Phase II Boston Edison AC Facilities Support Agreement between
Boston Edison Company and certain NEPOOL utilities, dated June 1,
1985 (Exhibit 7 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1985), File No.
2-30057).
10.1.25.1 Amendments Nos. 1 and 2 to 10.1.25 as amended May 1, 1986 and
February 1, 1987, respectively (Exhibit 2 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(March 1987), File No. 2-30057).
10.1.25.2 Amendments Nos. 3 and 4 to 10.1.25 as amended June 1, 1987 and
September 1, 1987, respectively (Exhibit 4 to the CEC Form 10-Q
(September 1987), File No. 2-30057).
<PAGE>
<PAGE 44>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.1.26 Agreement Authorizing Execution of Phase II Firm Energy Contract
among certain NEPOOL utilities in regard to participation in the
purchase of power from Hydro Quebec, dated September 1, 1985
(Exhibit 8 to the CEC Form 10-Q (September 1985), File No.
2-30057).
10.1.27 System Power Sales Agreement by and between Connecticut Light and
Power (CL&P), Western Massachusetts Electric Company (Northeast
Utilities companies), as sellers, and CEL, as buyer, of power in
excess of firm power customer requirements from the electric
systems of the Northeast Utilities companies, dated June 1, 1984,
as effective October 25, 1985 (Exhibit 1 to the CEL 1985 Form 10-K,
File No. 2-7909).
10.1.28 Power Sale Agreement by and between Altresco Pittsfield, L. P. and
the Company for entitlement to the electric capacity and related
energy to be produced by a cogeneration facility located in
Pittsfield, Massachusetts, dated February 20, 1992 (Exhibit 1 to
the CEL Form 10-Q (September 1993), File No. 2-7909).
10.1.28.1 System Exchange Agreement by and among Altresco Pittsfield, L.P.,
the Company, CE and New England Power Company, dated July 2, 1993
(Exhibit 3 to the CE Form 10-Q (September 1993), File No. 2-7749).
10.2 Other Agreements.
10.2.1 Pension Plan for Employees of Commonwealth Energy System and
Subsidiary Companies as amended and restated January 1, 1993
(Exhibit 1 to the CES Form 10-Q (September 1993), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.2 Employees Savings Plan of Commonwealth Energy System and Subsidiary
Companies as amended and restated January 1, 1993 (Exhibit 2 to the
CES Form 10-Q (September 1993), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.2.1 First Amendment to the Employees Savings Plan of Commonwealth
Energy System and Subsidiary Companies, as amended and restated as
of January 1, 1993, effective October 1, 1994. (Exhibit 1 to the
CES Form S-8 (January 1995), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3 NEPOOL Agreement dated September 1, 1971 as amended through August
1, 1977 between NEGEA Service Corporation, as agent for CEL, CEC,
NBGEL and various other electric utilities operating in New
England, together with amendments dated August 15, 1978, January
31, 1979 and February 1, 1980 (Exhibit 5(c)13 to the CES Form S-16
(April 1980), File No. 2-64731).
<PAGE>
<PAGE 45>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
10.2.3.1 Thirteenth Amendment to 10.2.3 dated September 1, 1981 (Exhibit 3
to the CES 1991 Form 10-K, File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.2 Fourteenth through Twentieth Amendments to 10.2.3 as amended
December 1, 1981, June 1, 1982, June 15, 1983, October 1, 1983,
August 1, 1985, August 15, 1985 and September 1, 1985, respectively
(Exhibit 4 to the CES Form 10-Q (September 1985), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.3 Twenty-first Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended to January 1, 1986
(Exhibit 1 to the CES Form 10-Q (March 1986), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.4 Twenty-second Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended to January 1, 1986
(Exhibit 1 to the CES Form 10-Q (September 1986), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.5 Twenty-third Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended April 30, 1987 (Exhibit
1 to the CES Form 10-Q (June 1987), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.6 Twenty-fourth Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended March 1, 1988 (Exhibit
1 to the CES 1987 Form 10-K, File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.7 Twenty-fifth Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended May 1, 1988 (Exhibit 1
to the CES Form 10-Q (March 1988), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.8 Twenty-sixth Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended March 15, 1989 (Exhibit
1 to the CES Form 10-Q (March 1989), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.9 Twenty-seventh Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended October 1, 1990
(Exhibit 3 to the CES 1990 Form 10-K, File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.10 Twenty-Eighth Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended September 15, 1992
(Exhibit 1 to the CES Form 10-Q (September 1994), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.3.11 Twenty-Ninth Amendment to 10.2.3 as amended May 1, 1993 (Exhibit 2
to the CES Form 10-Q (September 1994), File No. 1-7316).
10.2.4 Guarantee Agreement by CEL (as guarantor) and MYA Fuel Company (as
initial lender) covering the unconditional guarantee of a portion
of the payment obligations of Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
under a loan agreement and note initially between Maine Yankee and
MYA Fuel Company (Exhibit 3 to the CEL 1985 Form 10-K, File No.
2-7909).
Exhibit 27. Financial Data Schedule
Filed herewith as Exhibit 1 is the Financial Data Schedule for the twelve
months ended December 31, 1995.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the three months ended
December 31, 1995.
<PAGE>
<PAGE 46>
<TABLE>
SCHEDULE I
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
INVESTMENTS IN, EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF, AND DIVIDENDS RECEIVED
FROM RELATED PARTIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
(Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>
1995
Balance Balance
December 31, Equity December 31,
Name of Issuer and 1994 in Dividends 1995
Description of Investment Shares Amount Earnings Received Amount
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock
Connecticut Yankee
Atomic Power Company 15 750 $4 583 $ 674 $ 693 $4 564
Maine Yankee Atomic
Power Company 20 000 2 744 285 138 2 891
Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corporation 9 801 1 318 170 183 1 305
Yankee Atomic Electric
Company 3 068 519 (18) 37 464
Total $9 164 $1 111 $1 051 $9 224
Other Investments
Massachusetts Business
Development Corporation 500 $ 5 $ 5
Total $ 5 $ 5
<FN>
Under terms of the capital funds agreements and power contracts, no stock may be sold or transferred except
to another stockholder; however, no market exists for these securities.
See Note 3(e) of the Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a discussion of the
permanent closing of the nuclear plant owned by Yankee Atomic Electric Company.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<PAGE 47>
<TABLE>
SCHEDULE I
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
INVESTMENTS IN, EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF, AND DIVIDENDS RECEIVED
FROM RELATED PARTIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
(Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>
1994
Balance Balance
December 31, Equity December 31,
Name of Issuer and 1993 in Dividends 1994
Description of Investment Shares Amount Earnings Received Amount
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock
Connecticut Yankee
Atomic Power Company 15 750 $4 490 $ 743 $ 650 $4 583
Maine Yankee Atomic
Power Company 20 000 2 776 245 277 2 744
Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corporation 9 801 1 317 158 157 1 318
Yankee Atomic Electric
Company 3 068 476 43 - 519
Total $9 059 $1 189 $1 084 $9 164
Other Investments
Massachusetts Business
Development Corporation 500 $ 5 $ 5
Total $ 5 $ 5
<FN>
Under terms of the capital funds agreements and power contracts, no stock may be sold or transferred except
to another stockholder; however, no market exists for these securities.
See Note 3(e) of the Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a discussion of the
permanent closing of the nuclear plant owned by Yankee Atomic Electric Company.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<PAGE 48>
<TABLE>
SCHEDULE I
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
INVESTMENTS IN, EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF, AND DIVIDENDS RECEIVED
FROM RELATED PARTIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>
1993
Balance Balance
December 31, Equity December 31,
Name of Issuer and 1992 in Dividends 1993
Description of Investment Shares Amount Earnings Received Amount
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock
Connecticut Yankee
Atomic Power Company 15 750 $4 518 $ 563 $ 591 $4 490
Maine Yankee Atomic
Power Company 20 000 2 759 328 311 2 776
Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corporation 9 801 1 336 178 197 1 317
Yankee Atomic Electric
Company 3 068 476 - - 476
Total $9 089 $1 069 $1 099 $9 059
Other Investments
Massachusetts Business
Development Corporation 500 $ 5 $ 5
Total $ 5 $ 5
<FN>
Under terms of the capital funds agreements and power contracts, no stock may be sold or transferred except
to another stockholder; however, no market exists for these securities.
See Note 3(e) of the Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a discussion of the
permanent closing of the nuclear plant owned by Yankee Atomic Electric Company.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<PAGE 49>
SCHEDULE II
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
(Dollars in Thousands)
Additions
Balance at Provision Deductions Balance
Beginning Charged to Accounts End
Description of Year Operations Recoveries Written Off of Year
Year Ended December 31, 1995
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts $471 $327 $101 $409 $490
Year Ended December 31, 1994
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts $491 $561 $ 92 $673 $471
Year Ended December 31, 1993
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts $453 $257 $280 $499 $491
<PAGE>
<PAGE 50>
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
FORM 10-K DECEMBER 31, 1995
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
(Registrant)
By: WILLIAM G. POIST
William G. Poist,
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Principal Executive Officers:
WILLIAM G. POIST March 28, 1996
William G. Poist,
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
R. D. WRIGHT March 29, 1996
Russell D. Wright,
President and Chief Operating Officer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer:
JAMES D. RAPPOLI March 28, 1996
James D. Rappoli,
Financial Vice President and Treasurer
A majority of the Board of Directors:
WILLIAM G. POIST March 28, 1996
William G. Poist, Director
R. D. WRIGHT March 29, 1996
Russell D. Wright, Director
JAMES D. RAPPOLI March 28, 1996
James D. Rappoli, Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Cambridge Electric Light
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE> PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT> 99,311
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST> 9,229
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS> 18,551
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES> 9,951
<OTHER-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 137,042
<COMMON> 8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN> 27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS> 7,561
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ> 44,179
0
0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET> 41,865
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES> 5,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE> 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS> 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT> 160
0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS> 0
<LEASES-CURRENT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB> 45,738
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB> 137,042
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE> 123,354
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE> 2,725
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES> 111,171
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES> 113,896
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS> 9,458
<OTHER-INCOME-NET> 258
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN> 9,716
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE> 4,278
<NET-INCOME> 5,438
0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM> 5,438
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS> 5,043
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS> 3,776
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS> 9,058
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
