<PAGE>
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [_]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement [_] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE
COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY
RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or
Section 240.14a-12
CATERPILLAR INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[_] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1),
14a-6(i)(2) or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[_] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF CATERPILLAR (R)]
100 NE Adams Street
Peoria, Illinois 61629
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Wednesday, April 9, 1997
10:30 a.m., Pacific Time
Loews Coronado
4000 Coronado Bay
Coronado, California
February 28, 1997
Fellow stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 1997 Caterpillar Inc. Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to:
. Elect four directors.
. Approve appointment of Price Waterhouse LLP as independent auditors for
1997.
. Act on one stockholder proposal to be presented.
. Conduct other business properly brought before the meeting.
You must have an admission ticket to attend and procedures for obtaining
that ticket are discussed later in more detail. Stockholders of record at the
close of business on February 10, 1997 may vote at the meeting.
Your vote is important. Whether you plan to attend or not, please sign,
date, and return the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. If you attend
the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.
I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Donald V. Fites
--------------------
Donald V. Fites
Chairman
<PAGE>
Table of Contents
Notice of Annual Meeting................................................. Cover
Attendance and Voting Matters................................................ 1
The Caterpillar Board of Directors........................................... 2
Caterpillar Stock Owned by Officers and Directors............................ 6
Persons Owning More than Five Percent of Caterpillar Stock................... 7
Performance Graph............................................................ 7
Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation............... 8
Executive Compensation Tables................................................ 13
Certain Related Transactions................................................. 16
Appointment of Price Waterhouse LLP.......................................... 16
Stockholder Proposal and Caterpillar Response................................ 17
Other Matters................................................................ 19
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance................ 19
Stockholder Proposals for the 1998 Annual Meeting...................... 19
Solicitation........................................................... 19
Stockholder List....................................................... 19
Revocability of Proxy.................................................. 19
Appendix - General and Financial Information - 1996..........................A-1
i
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENDANCE AND VOTING MATTERS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADMISSION TICKET REQUIRED
You must have an admission ticket to attend the Annual Meeting and
admission is limited to stockholders of record on the record date or their
authorized proxy holder. Send written requests for tickets to the Company's
Secretary, R. Rennie Atterbury III, by April 1, 1997. Remember that if your
shares are held in the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee, please
include in your request an account statement or letter from the nominee
indicating that you are the beneficial owner of the shares as of the record
date.
VOTING METHODS
You can vote on matters to come before the meeting in two ways:
. You can come to the Annual Meeting and cast your vote there; or
. You can vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. If you do
so, the individuals named on the card will vote your shares in the
manner you indicate.
Each share of Caterpillar stock you own entitles you to one vote. As of
February 10, 1997, there were 189,657,071 shares of Caterpillar common stock
outstanding.
GIVING YOUR PROXY TO SOMEONE OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS DESIGNATED ON THE CARD
If you want to give your proxy to someone other than individuals noted on
the proxy card, you may do so by crossing out the names of those individuals and
inserting the name of the individual you are authorizing to vote. Either you or
that authorized individual must present the proxy at the Annual Meeting, along
with an admission ticket issued to you by Caterpillar.
THE QUORUM REQUIREMENT
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. If at least
one-third of Caterpillar stockholders are present in person or by proxy, a
quorum will exist. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for
establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker votes on some
matters on the proxy card but not on others because he does not have the
authority to do so.
VOTE NECESSARY FOR ACTION
Directors are elected by a plurality vote of shares present at the meeting,
meaning that the director nominee with the most affirmative votes for a
particular slot is elected for that slot. In an uncontested election for
directors, the plurality requirement is not a factor. Other action is by an
affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present at the meeting.
Abstentions and non-votes have the effect of a no vote on matters other than
director elections.
1
<PAGE>
MATTERS RAISED AT THE MEETING NOT INCLUDED IN THIS STATEMENT
We do not know of any matters to be acted upon at the meeting other than those
discussed in this statement. If any other matter is presented, proxy holders
will vote on the matter in their discretion.
To present other matters to the meeting you must provide advance written
notice to Caterpillar. For purposes of the 1997 Annual Meeting, that notice must
be received by March 15, 1997.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Caterpillar Board of Directors
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are proud of outside recognition received by our Board of Directors this
past year. Our Board was awarded honorable mention in the 1996
Wharton/SpencerStuart Board of the Year Contest. The panel making the award
cited our Board for excellence in corporate governance and for consistently
acting in the best long-term interests of shareholders, customers, employees,
and the community. Our Board was also selected as one of the 25 best boards by
Business Week in 1996.
Board members wish to express their deep sense of loss upon the death of one
of our members in 1996, Mr. Jerry Junkins. Joining the Caterpillar Board in
1988, Jerry served on every committee of the Board and unfailingly lent his
incisive business sense to Caterpillar. Jerry will continue to be missed both in
the deliberations of the Caterpillar Board and as a friend.
STRUCTURE
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes for purposes of election.
One class is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders to serve for a
three-year term.
At the 1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the terms of four directors are
expiring. Those directors nominated for election at this annual meeting would
hold office for a three-year term expiring in 2000. Other directors are not up
for election this year and will continue in office for the remainder of their
terms. Mr. John W. Fondahl is retiring from the Board effective April 9, 1997,
because he has reached our mandatory director retirement age of 72. We wish to
thank John for his twenty years of loyal service to our Board.
If a nominee is unavailable for election, proxy holders will vote for another
nominee proposed by the Board or, as an alternative, the Board may reduce the
number of directors to be elected at the meeting.
2
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS NOMINATED THIS YEAR FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2000
LILYAN H. AFFINITO, 65, retired in 1991 as Vice Chairman of the Board of
Maxxam Group Inc. (forest products, real estate management and development, and
integrated aluminum production operations). Other directorships: Chrysler
Corporation; Tambrands Inc.; Jostens Inc.; Kmart Corporation; Lillian Vernon
Corporation; and New York Telephone Company and New England Telephone and
Telegraph Company (NYNEX Telephone subsidiaries). Ms. Affinito has been a
director of the Company since 1980.
DONALD V. FITES, 63, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Caterpillar Inc.
since 1990. Other directorships: First Chicago NBD Corporation; Georgia-Pacific
Corporation; and Mobil Corporation. Mr. Fites has been a director of the Company
since 1986.
DAVID R. GOODE, 56, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Norfolk Southern
Corporation (holding company engaged principally in surface transportation)
since 1992 and President since 1991. Other directorships: Georgia-Pacific
Corporation; Norfolk Southern Corporation; Texas Instruments Incorporated; and
TRINOVA Corporation. Mr. Goode has been a director of the Company since 1993.
JOSHUA I. SMITH, 55, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The MAXIMA
Corporation (computer systems and management information products and services)
since 1978. Other directorships: Federal Express Corporation; Inland Steel
Corporation; and The Allstate Corporation. Mr. Smith has been a director of the
Company since 1993.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR these nominees.
DIRECTORS UP FOR ELECTION IN 1999
W. FRANK BLOUNT, 58, Chief Executive Officer of Telstra Corporation Limited
(telecommunications) since 1992. From 1991 to 1992 Mr. Blount served as
President and CEO of the New American Schools Development Corp. Other
directorships: Entergy Corporation, First Union National Bank of Georgia, and
LXE Inc. Mr. Blount has been a director of the Company since 1995.
JAMES P. GORTER, 67, Chairman of the Board of Baker, Fentress & Company
(closed end fund) since 1987 and Limited Partner of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
(investment bankers) since 1988. Other directorships: Consolidated-Tomoka Land
Co. Mr. Gorter has been a director of the Company since 1990.
PETER A. MAGOWAN, 54, Chairman of Safeway Inc. (supermarket chain) since 1980
and Chief Executive Officer from 1980 to 1993. Mr. Magowan is also President and
Managing General Partner of the San Francisco Giants (baseball team). Other
directorships: Chrysler Corporation and The Vons Companies, Inc. Mr. Magowan has
been a director of the Company since 1993.
CLAYTON K. YEUTTER, 66, Of Counsel to Hogan & Hartson (a Washington, D.C. law
firm) since 1993. Mr. Yeutter served as Counselor for Domestic Affairs to
President George Bush in 1992 and as Chairman of the Republican National
Committee from 1991 to 1992. Other directorships: ConAgra, Inc., Texas
Instruments Incorporated, B.A.T. Industries, Oppenheimer Funds, FMC Corporation,
and IMC Global, Inc. Mr. Yeutter has been a director of the Company since 1991.
3
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS UP FOR ELECTION IN 1998
GORDON R. PARKER, 61, retired in 1994 as Chairman of Newmont Mining
Corporation and Newmont Gold Company (worldwide gold mining). Other
directorships: The Williams Companies, Inc., Gold Fields of South Africa Ltd.,
and Phelps Dodge Corporation. Mr. Parker has been a director of the Company
since 1995.
GEORGE A. SCHAEFER, 68, retired in 1990 as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Caterpillar Inc. Other directorships: Aon Corporation; Helmerich &
Payne, Inc.; McDonnell Douglas Corporation; and Morton International, Inc. Mr.
Schaefer has been a director of the Company since 1983.
JOHN T. DILLON, 58, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of International
Paper (paper and forest products) since 1996. Prior to his current position, Mr.
Dillon was President and Chief Operation Officer from 1995 to 1996 and Executive
Vice President - Packaging from 1987 to 1995. Other directorships: IP Forest
Resources Company (the managing general partner of IP Timberlands, Ltd.). Mr.
Dillon has been a director of the Company since 1997.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
In 1996, our full Board met seven times. In addition to meetings of the full
Board, directors attended meetings of individual Board committees and often
considered issues separate from these meetings. For our incumbent Board as a
whole, attendance in 1996 at full Board and committee meetings exceeded 95%.
Our Board has four standing committees that serve a critical function for
Caterpillar and its stockholders.
The Audit Committee reviews management's independent accountant selection and
makes recommendations to the Board based on that review. The Committee also
questions management, including Caterpillar's internal audit staff, and
independent accountants on the application of accounting and reporting standards
to Caterpillar. Present members of the Committee are Messrs. David R. Goode
(chairman), W. Frank Blount, James P. Gorter, Gordon R. Parker, and George A.
Schaefer. During 1996, the Committee held four meetings.
The Compensation Committee reviews Caterpillar's compensation practices and
approves its compensation programs and plans. Present members of the Committee
are Ms. Lilyan H. Affinito and Messrs. James P. Gorter (chairman), John T.
Dillon, David R. Goode, Peter A. Magowan, and Clayton K. Yeutter. During 1996,
the Committee held three meetings.
The Nominating Committee recommends candidates to fill Board vacancies and for
the slate to be proposed by the Board at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The
Nominating Committee also advises the Board on nominees for Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer, and other executive officer positions in the
Company.
The Nominating Committee considers director nominees from stockholders for
election at the annual stockholders' meeting if a written nomination is received
by Caterpillar's Corporate
4
<PAGE>
Secretary not later than ninety days in advance of the meeting (nomination
procedures are discussed in greater detail in our bylaws which will be provided
upon written request).
Present members of the Committee are Messrs. Joshua I. Smith (chairman), W.
Frank Blount, Donald V. Fites, Gordon R. Parker, and George A. Schaefer. During
1996, the Committee held three meetings.
The Public Policy Committee makes recommendations to the Board on public
and social policy issues impacting Caterpillar. The Committee also oversees
Caterpillar's compliance programs and reviews major litigation, legislation and
stockholder matters not within the responsibilities of another Board committee.
Present members of the Committee are Ms. Lilyan H. Affinito and Messrs. Clayton
K. Yeutter, (chairman), Donald V. Fites, John T. Dillon, Peter A. Magowan, and
Joshua I. Smith. During 1996, the Committee held two meetings.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Of our current Board members, only one, Mr. Fites, is a salaried employee
of Caterpillar. Board members that are not salaried employees of Caterpillar
receive separate compensation for Board service. That compensation includes:
Annual Retainer: $30,000
Attendance Fees: $1,000 for each Board meeting
$1,000 for each Board Committee meeting
Expenses related to attendance
Committee Chairman Stipend: $5,000 annually
Stock Options: 2,000 shares annually
Restricted Stock: 375 shares annually (200 shares have a
restricted period of three years, while 175
shares are restricted until the director
terminates service)
Under Caterpillar's Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan, directors may
defer fifty percent or more of their annual compensation in an interest bearing
account or an account representing shares of Caterpillar stock.
Our directors also participate in a Charitable Award Program. Beginning in
the year of a director's death, an amount is paid proportionately in ten annual
installments to charities selected by the director and to the Caterpillar
Charitable Foundation. The maximum amount payable under the program is $1
million and is based on the director's length of service. The program is
financed through the purchase of life insurance policies, and directors derive
no financial benefit from the program.
Caterpillar's Directors' Retirement Plan was eliminated effective December
31, 1996. When the plan was eliminated, each director continuing in office
received an amount of restricted stock equal to the dollar value of past
pension accruals to be held in escrow until the director terminates service. In
addition, the dollar value of future annual pension accruals that would have
been made was determined and, as a result, directors will receive an annual
award of 175 shares of restricted stock, also to be held in escrow until the
director retires.
5
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATERPILLAR STOCK OWNED BY OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
(As of December 31, 1996)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Lilyan H. Affinito 14,800/1/
Glen A. Barton 57,503/2/
W. Frank Blount 700
Donald V. Fites 325,526/3/
Gerald S. Flaherty 97,348/4/
John W. Fondahl 15,400/5/
David R. Goode 3,400/6/
James P. Gorter 12,400/7/
Peter A. Magowan 5,100/8/
James W. Owens 49,338/9/
Gordon R. Parker 2,067/10/
George A. Schaefer 34,404/11/
Joshua I. Smith 2,500/12/
Richard L. Thompson 22,280/13/
Clayton K. Yeutter 5,300/14/
All directors and executive officers as a group 1,363,802/15/
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/1/ Includes 14,000 shares subject to outside director stock options
exercisable within 60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Ms.
Affinito has deferred a portion of her director compensation pursuant to
the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan representing an equivalent value
as if such compensation had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 3,392
shares of Common Stock.
/2/ Includes 30,402 shares subject to employee stock options exercisable within
60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr. Barton has deferred a
portion of his compensation pursuant to supplemental employees' investment
plans representing an equivalent value as if such compensation had been
invested on December 31, 1996 in 1,988 shares of Common Stock.
/3/ Includes 257,000 shares subject to employee stock options exercisable
within 60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr. Fites has
deferred a portion of his compensation pursuant to supplemental employees'
investment plans representing an equivalent value as if such compensation
had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 5,599 shares of Common Stock.
/4/ Includes 52,267 shares subject to employee stock options exercisable within
60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr. Flaherty has deferred
a portion of his compensation pursuant to supplemental employees'
investment plans representing an equivalent value as if such compensation
had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 3,001 shares of Common Stock.
/5/ Includes 14,000 shares subject to outside director stock options
exercisable within 60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr.
Fondahl has deferred a portion of his director compensation pursuant to the
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan representing an equivalent value as
if such compensation had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 2,063 shares
of Common Stock.
/6/ Includes 2,000 shares subject to outside director stock options exercisable
within 60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr. Goode has
deferred a portion of his director compensation pursuant to the Directors'
Deferred Compensation Plan representing an equivalent value as if such
compensation had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 1,509 shares of
Common Stock.
/7/ Includes 10,000 shares subject to outside director stock options
exercisable within 60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr.
Gorter has deferred a portion of his director compensation pursuant to the
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan representing an equivalent value as
if such compensation had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 1,514 shares
of Common Stock.
/8/ Includes 2,000 shares subject outside director stock options exercisable
within 60 days.
/9/ Includes 26,514 shares subject to employee stock options exercisable within
60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr. Owens has deferred a
portion of his compensation pursuant to supplemental employees' investment
plans representing an equivalent value as if such compensation had been
invested on December 31, 1996 in 1,045 shares of Common Stock.
/10/ Includes 667 shares subject to outside director stock options exercisable
within 60 days.
/11/ Includes 8,000 shares subject to outside director stock options exercisable
within 60 days.
/12/ Includes 2,000 shares subject to outside director stock options exercisable
within 60 days.
/13/ Includes 8,334 shares subject to employee stock options exercisable within
60 days. In addition to the shares listed above Mr. Thompson has deferred a
portion of his compensation pursuant to supplemental employees' investment
plans representing an equivalent value as if such compensation had been
invested on December 31, 1996 in 1,083 shares of Common Stock.
/14/ Includes 4,000 shares subject to outside director stock options exercisable
within 60 days. In addition to the shares listed above, Mr. Yeutter has
deferred a portion of his director compensation pursuant to the Directors'
Deferred Compensation Plan representing an equivalent value as if such
compensation had been invested on December 31, 1996 in 1,248 shares of
Common Stock.
/15/ Includes 843,939 shares subject to employee and outside director stock
options exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 14,465 shares for which
voting and investment power is shared and 700 shares for which beneficial
ownership has been disclaimed. All directors and executive officers as a
group beneficially own less than one percent of Company Common Stock.
6
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERSONS OWNING MORE THAN FIVE PERCENT OF CATERPILLAR STOCK
(AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Voting Dispositive Total Amount Percent
Authority Authority of Beneficial of
Sole Shared Sole Shared Ownership Class
Name and Address
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Joint filing by The Capital Group
Companies, Inc. and 462,740 None 13,934,940 None 13,934,940 7.2%
Capital Research and
Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joint filing by FMR Corp.,
Edward C. Johnson 3d,
and Abigail P. Johnson 698,572 1,500 13,703,154 1,500 13,704,654 7.16%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Stockholder
Return Among Caterpillar Inc., S&P 500 Composite Index,
and S&P Machinery (Diversified) Index
[GRAPH APPEARS HERE]
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
--------------------------------------------------------------
Caterpillar 100 123.62 206.92 258.45 281.06 367.62
S&P 500 100 107.61 118.41 120.01 164.95 202.73
S&P Machinery
(Diversified) 100 102.04 151.07 147.08 181.47 225.01
7
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of the Compensation Committee
on Executive Compensation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION POLICIES
The Compensation Committee ("Committee") establishes compensation
guidelines and targets based upon the performance of Caterpillar, business units
within Caterpillar, and individual executive officers. The Committee's goal is
to establish a compensation program that:
. links the interests of management and stockholders;
. links executive compensation with long-term Caterpillar performance; and
. attracts and retains executives of high caliber and ability.
For 1996, that program consisted of base salary, short-term incentive
compensation, stock options, and long-term incentive compensation.
The Committee believes this compensation program was a significant factor
contributing to Caterpillar's success this past year, including record profit
of $1.36 billion or $7.07 per share. As the performance graph demonstrates,
Caterpillar stock has provided holders with a cumulative return for the past
five years that significantly exceeds the S&P 500 Composite Index and
Caterpillar's peer group, the S&P Machinery (Diversified) Index.
BASE SALARY
Executive Officers
------------------
Each year the Committee reviews base salaries of individual executive
officers and their salary ranges. In determining adjustments to base salary and
salary ranges for a particular year, the Committee relies on consultant surveys
regarding salaries and other short-term compensation ("total short-term
compensation") at comparable companies. In making salary adjustments, the
Committee also makes subjective determinations regarding the performance of
individual officers with the assistance of those officers' supervisors.
In setting 1996 base salaries and salary ranges for all executive officers,
including Mr. Fites, the Committee referred to the Hewitt Survey of Core Group I
Companies. The Hewitt Survey included 25 companies, all of which are in the S&P
500 Composite Index and none of which are in the S&P Machinery (Diversified)
Index. According to the Hewitt Survey, total short-term compensation of
Caterpillar executive officers was below market average.
Based on the Hewitt Survey results, the Committee increased the salary
ranges for executive officers by 10% for 1996. The Committee also approved
increases in the base salary of all executive officers for 1996. These
increases were based upon a subjective analysis of each officer's individual
performance. After these adjustments, the total short-term compensation of
executive officers as a group remained below average according to the Hewitt
Survey.
8
<PAGE>
Chief Executive Officer
-----------------------
For 1996 Mr. Fites' base salary was increased to $1.15 million. In
determining his base salary, the Committee used the Hewitt Survey as a
benchmark. With the increase to Mr. Fites, his base salary for 1996 was
slightly higher than the average of CEOs included in the Hewitt Survey, but his
total short-term compensation was slightly lower.
In setting Mr. Fites' 1996 salary, the Committee also evaluated his
performance as an executive in the prior year. Determinative factors included
his contributions to Caterpillar, his home community, and a variety of national
and international business organizations. Some of the significant achievements
considered are set forth below:
. continued record profits and sales for Caterpillar;
. reengineered business processes continued to result in significant
reductions in product development time, necessary physical testing, and
product development costs;
. strategic alliances and acquisitions designed to enhance Caterpillar's
competitive position were pursued and completed;
. Mr. Fites continued his active participation in initiatives and
organizations designed to benefit not only Caterpillar but industry as a
whole.
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive Officers
------------------
In 1996, executive officers, together with most management and salaried
employees, participated in Caterpillar's Corporate Incentive Compensation
Plan. Payouts under the Incentive Plan for 1996 were based on a team award
incorporating Caterpillar's pre-tax return on assets ("ROA") for the year and
an individual award based on a subjective determination of individual
performance. For 1996, a total of approximately $208 million was earned by
Caterpillar employees under the corporate and business unit incentive plans.
For 1996, the team award portion of the payout was calculated by
multiplying:
. annual base salary;
. a specific percentage of base salary, which increases for higher
positions within Caterpillar, placing a greater percentage of
compensation at risk for those with greater opportunity to affect
Caterpillar performance; and
. a performance factor based upon Caterpillar's achievement of specific
levels of ROA.
Before any amount could be awarded under the Incentive Plan for 1996, a
minimum ROA level had to be achieved. Increasing amounts are awarded for
achievement up to a maximum ROA. Minimum, target, and maximum ROA levels to be
achieved were decreased from 1995, based on the Committee's consideration of
forecasted profit and asset levels for 1996. For 1996, the target ROA level
under the Incentive Plan was exceeded (although the maximum was not achieved)
and all executive officers received a team award.
9
<PAGE>
In addition to a team award, all executive officers received an individual
award under the Incentive Plan for 1996 based on a subjective determination of
individual performance. The aggregate of individual awards to all officers
cannot exceed the amount available in a discretionary pool established for such
awards. The discretionary pool amount is a specific percentage of team awards
paid to all executive officers.
In 1996, 19 executive officers participated in incentive plans applicable
to their business units. Caterpillar has 227 incentive compensation plans
applicable to business units and divisions within those units. Each business
unit within Caterpillar has its own criteria for determining incentive
compensation for its employees. With the exception of 11 incentive compensation
plans, for 1996, at least 25% of the payout under a business unit plan had to be
based on Caterpillar achievement of ROA levels applicable to the Incentive Plan.
Other factors determining business unit payout in 1996 included return on sales
("ROS") for the particular unit, unit ROA, unit profit, operating expenses,
percentage of industry sales, and customer satisfaction. In addition, units
providing administrative services to other units within Caterpillar had a
portion of their incentive compensation tied to the performance of those other
units. The two most widely used factors determining payouts under the business
unit plans in 1996 were unit ROS and unit ROA.
In 1996, executive officers participating in their respective business unit
incentive plans were eligible to receive fifty percent of the team award amount
that would have been awarded if he or she had participated solely in the
business unit plans, and fifty percent of the amount that would have been
awarded had the officer participated solely in the Incentive Plan. Nineteen
executive officers received payments based on 1996 performance of their
business units.
Chief Executive Officer
-----------------------
Because Caterpillar exceeded its target ROA level under the Incentive Plan
for 1996, Mr. Fites received a team award under the Incentive Plan. Mr. Fites
also received an individual award under the Incentive Plan for 1996.
At the beginning of 1996, Mr. Fites discussed with the Committee his goals
and expectations for the year. As discussed more fully below, Mr. Fites met
those goals with the type of leadership that resulted in being named for the
third year in a row as a gold award winner in the machinery industry by the
Wall Street Transcript. That award is based on interviews with industry
leaders, financial analysts, money managers, trade journalists and academics
analyzing the extent to which a CEO has taken steps to enhance the overall
value of the enterprise for the benefit of stockholders.
Mr. Fites' Goals and Results
. Caterpillar Results Mr. Fites set benchmarks for Caterpillar sales and
revenues, as well as profit after tax. Those goals were exceeded in 1996
by a significant margin and were once again at record levels.
. Strategic Alliances Mr. Fites established a goal of successfully
implementing strategic alliances completed in 1995, as well as pursuing
additional transactions in 1996 designed to improve Caterpillar's
competitive position and enhance shareholder value. Mr. Fites met these
goals in 1996. Alliances involving F.G. Wilson Ltd., Elphinstone Pty.
Ltd., and Brown Group Holdings Ltd. have been successfully absorbed into
the
10
<PAGE>
Caterpillar organization. In addition, Caterpillar purchased the MaK
diesel engine unit of Fried Krupp AG, providing a natural extension of
its diesel engine line. Caterpillar also pursued several smaller
acquisitions designed to enhance sales of attachments for Caterpillar
machines.
. Contact with Core Constituencies As in 1995, Mr. Fites expressed his
commitment to maintaining regular contact with financial analysts,
stockholders, dealers, customers, and employees. Mr. Fites again met
that goal. In July of 1996, he met with a group of approximately 100
analysts in New York, and maintained regular contact with Caterpillar
stockholders. Mr. Fites also attended several meetings of Caterpillar
dealers and personally called on over 30 major customers. In addition,
Mr. Fites personally visited over 14 Caterpillar facilities outside the
Peoria, Illinois area in 1996.
. Industry-Wide Efforts In 1996, Mr. Fites continued his participation in
initiatives designed to benefit industry as a whole. He completed a two-
year term as Chairman of the U.S.-Japan Business Council, providing
excellent leadership to that important group. He also was elected
Chairman of the Business Roundtable, an association of more than 200
CEOs of leading U.S. corporations representing over 10 million
employees. In that capacity, Mr. Fites has energetically forwarded the
promotion of public policies that create jobs, ensure a climate for
growth and foster export strength.
. Commitment to Charities and the Peoria Community Areas of accomplishment
in which Mr. Fites should be particularly proud include his commitment
to charitable organizations and his dedication to the Peoria, Illinois
community. In 1996, Mr. Fites served as Vice Chairman of the Salvation
Army National Advisory Board and received that group's "William Booth
Award," an award given to an individual dedicated to the goals of the
Salvation Army that has displayed outstanding humanitarian effort in the
community. In addition, Mr. Fites chaired a $100 million capital
campaign for Bradley University and approved a $3 million contribution
from Caterpillar for the development of the Peoria, Illinois riverfront.
STOCK OPTIONS
Executive Officers
------------------
In 1996, all executive officers, as well as other key employees, were
granted incentive and non-qualified stock options under Caterpillar's 1996
Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan. Incentive stock options were granted
up to the maximum number of shares which may be issued in accordance with U.S.
tax law to an individual. The remaining portion of any option grant not issued
as an incentive stock option was issued as a non-qualified stock option.
The number of options granted to a particular officer in 1996 depended upon
that officer's position and a subjective assessment of that officer's
individual performance. Specifically, a base stock option award was determined
for each officer level. The award was then adjusted based on individual
performance.
11
<PAGE>
To ensure executive officers retain significant stockholdings in
Caterpillar, the Committee encourages them to own a number of shares at least
equal to the average number of shares for which they received options in their
last three option grants. For 1996, if one-hundred percent of the minimum
ownership guideline was not met, significant progress had not been made to
achieve the desired ownership level, or a satisfactory explanation for failure
to meet the guideline had not been presented, the Committee would have reduced
the number of shares included in the officer's grant. For 1996, no officer was
penalized for low share ownership in receiving stock options.
Chief Executive Officer
-----------------------
In 1996, Mr. Fites received an option grant covering 75,000 shares of
Caterpillar stock, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and Option
Grants Table. Like other executive officers, Mr. Fites received this grant
based upon his position at Caterpillar and an assessment of his individual
performance. Individual performance factors considered by the Committee are
those discussed above with respect to Mr. Fites' individual Incentive Plan
award.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive Officers
------------------
Under the long-term incentive portion of the Option Plan ("LTIP"), a
three-year performance period ("cycle") is established each year, with
participants receiving a payout (50% in cash and 50% in restricted stock) if
certain minimum, target or maximum performance thresholds are achieved at the
end of the cycle. The Committee has discretion to apply different performance
criteria for different cycles. The Committee also has discretion during a cycle
to adjust performance measures set for that period to reflect changes in
accounting principles and practices; mergers, acquisitions or divestitures;
major technical innovations; or extraordinary, nonrecurring or unusual items.
A cycle under the LTIP's predecessor (i.e. , a long-term incentive
supplement to Caterpillar's 1987 Stock Option Plan) was established at the
beginning of 1994 for the years 1994-1996, with a payout to occur in 1997.
Amounts that could be paid at the end of that cycle depended upon an
executive's base salary at the end of the period, a predetermined percentage of
that salary that varied based on an executive's position, and whether certain
after-tax ROA thresholds had been achieved. For an executive to receive any
payout under the cycle established in 1994, Caterpillar had to achieve a
threshold ROA level for the cycle. If a target ROA level was achieved, a larger
amount would be received, while attaining a certain maximum ROA level would
yield the maximum amount payable under the cycle. For the cycle established in
1994, the target ROA level was exceeded and all executives, including those
named in the Summary Compensation Table, received a payout in early 1997 under
that cycle. The total value of cash and restricted stock received by LTIP
participants under the cycle established in 1994 was approximately $10.7
million.
Cycles were also established under the LTIP's predecessor in 1995 and 1996
for the periods 1995-1997 and 1996-1998, with payouts to occur, if at all, in
1998 and 1999. Like the 1994 cycle discussed above, a payout under these cycles
will depend upon an executive's base salary at the end of the period, a
predetermined percentage of that salary that varies based on the executive's
position, and whether certain after-tax ROA levels (minimum, target, and
maximum levels) have been achieved.
12
<PAGE>
Chief Executive Officer
-----------------------
Mr. Fites received a payout in 1997 under the 1994 LTIP cycle based on the
criteria discussed above. The amount received by Mr. Fites is disclosed in the
LTIP Payouts column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Mr. Fites also has the potential to receive in 1998 and 1999 a payout under
the LTIP for the 1995-1997 and 1996-1998 cycles based on the criteria discussed
above. Minimum, target, and maximum amounts that could be received by Mr. Fites,
as well as other named executive officers, are referenced in the Long-Term
Incentive Plans/Awards Table.
By the Compensation Committee consisting of:
James P. Gorter (Chairman) Clayton K. Yeutter John W. Fondahl
David R. Goode Peter A. Magowan Lilyan H. Affinito
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Compensation Tables
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary Compensation Table
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual -----------------------------
Compensation Awards Payouts
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities LTIP
Name and Other Annual Underlying Payouts All Other
Principal Position Year Salary Bonus/2/ Compensation Options ($) Compensation/1/
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D. V. Fites, 1996 $1,150,000 $1,151,150 -0- 75,000 $1,000,500/3/ $55,000
Chairman 1995 1,000,000 564,000 -0- 75,000 900,000 48,000
and CEO 1994 800,000 772,800 -0- 60,000 -0- 38,400
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. A. Barton, 1996 450,000 321,750 -0- 25,000 326,250/3/ 18,299
Group President 1995 400,000 188,000 -0- 25,000 300,000 16,000
1994 360,000 289,800 -0- 20,000 -0- 15,600
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. S. Flaherty, 1996 450,000 321,750 -0- 25,000 326,250/3/ 21,600
Group President 1995 400,000 188,000 -0- 25,000 300,000 19,200
1994 360,000 289,000 -0- 20,000 -0- 16,560
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. W. Owens, 1996 380,000 271,700 -0- 25,000 257,133/3/ 11,400
Group President 1995 330,000 155,100 -0- 25,000 214,500 9,900
1994 240,000 173,880 -0- 10,200 -0- 7,200
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. L. Thompson, 1996 380,000 271,700 -0- 25,000 257,133/3/ 11,400
Group President 1995 330,000 155,100 -0- 25,000 214,500 9,901
1994 265,000 186,626 -0- 10,400 -0- 7,951
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/1/Consists of matching Company contributions, respectively, for the Employees'
Investment Plan (EIP) and Supplemental Employees' Investment Plans of Messrs.
Fites ($7,800/$47,400), Barton ($6,466/$11,833), Flaherty ($7,400/$14,200),
Owens ($4,625/$6,775), and Thompson ($4,625/$6,775).
/2/Consists of cash payments made pursuant to the Corporate Incentive
Compensation Plan in 1997 with respect to 1996 performance, in 1996 with
respect to 1995 performance, and in 1995 with respect to 1994 performance.
/3/This payout was made in early 1997. Fifty percent of it was in cash and fifty
percent in restricted stock. The Company's average stock price on December
31, 1996 ($75.8125 per share) was used to determine the restricted stock
portion of the payout. As of December 31, 1996, the number and value of
restricted stock held by Messrs. Fites, Barton, Flaherty, Owens, and Thompson
was, respectively, 7,675 ($581,861), 2,558 ($193,928), 2,558 ($193,928),
1,829 ($138,661), and 1,829 ($138,661). Dividends accrue on this restricted
stock.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13
<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option Grants in 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Grants
- -------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
% of Total Potential Realizable Value
Number of Options at Assumed Annual Rates
Securities Granted to of Stock Price Appreciation
Underlying Employees Exercise for Option Term/1/
Options In Fiscal Price Expiration ------------------------------
Name Granted/2/ Year 1996/3/ Per Share Date 5% 10%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D.V. Fites 75,000 4.5 $65.8125 06/11/2006 $ 3,104,183 $ 7,866,585
G.A. Barton 25,000 1.5 65.8125 06/11/2006 1,034,728 2,622,200
G.S. Flaherty 25,000 1.5 65.8125 06/11/2006 1,034,728 2,622,200
J.W. Owens 25,000 1.5 65.8125 06/11/2006 1,034,728 2,622,200
R.L. Thompson 25,000 1.5 65.8125 06/11/2006 1,034,728 2,622,200
Executive Group 419,910 25.19 65.8125 06/11/2006 17,379,697 44,043,604
All Stockholders/4/ N/A N/A N/A N/A 7,990,165,589 20,248,666,590
Executive Group
Gains as % of all
Stockholder Gain N/A N/A N/A N/A .22% .22%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/1/ The dollar amounts under these columns reflect the 5% and 10% rates of
appreciation prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 5%
and 10% rates of appreciation would result in per share prices of $107.2016
and $170.7007, respectively. The Company expresses no opinion regarding
whether this level of appreciation will be realized and expressly disclaims
any representation to that effect.
/2/ Options are exercisable upon completion of one full year of employment
following the grant date (except in the case of death or retirement) and
vest at the rate of one-third per year over the three years following the
grant. Upon exercise, option holders may surrender shares to pay the option
exercise price and satisfy tax withholding requirements.
/3/ In 1996 options for 419,910 shares were granted to all executive officers,
as a group; options for 22,000 shares were granted to all directors who are
not executive officers, as a group; and options for 1,247,140 shares were
granted to all employees other than executive officers, as a group.
/4/ For "All Stockholders" the potential realizable value is calculated from
$65.8125, the price of Common Stock on June 11, 1996, based on the
outstanding shares of Common Stock on that date.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in 1996,
and 1996 Year-End Option/SAR Values
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised
Options/SARs at In-the-Money Options/
1996 Year-End SARs at 1996 Year-End
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares Acquired Value
Name On Exercise/1/ Realized/2/ Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D.V. Fites -0- $ -0- 257,000 145,000 $9,589,192 $1,889,064
G.A. Barton 19,905 618,728 30,402 48,333 763,460 629,685
G.S. Flaherty -0- -0- 52,267 48,333 1,639,501 629,685
J.W. Owens 320 12,410 26,514 45,066 701,417 558,730
R.L. Thompson 10,333 259,220 8,334 45,133 124,489 560,185
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
/1/ Upon exercise, option holders may surrender shares to pay the option
exercise price and satisfy tax witholding requirements. The amounts
provided are gross amounts absent netting for shares surrendered.
/2/ Calculated on the basis of the fair market value of the underlying
securities at the exercise date or year-end, as the case may be, minus the
exercise price.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Incentive
Plans/Awards in 1996
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance or Estimated future payouts under
Other Period Until non-stock price-based plans
Name Maturation or Payout Threshold Target Maximun
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D.V. Fites 1996-1998 $345,000 $690,000 $1,035,000
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 1995-1997 345,000 690,000 1,035,000
G. A. Barton 1996-1998 112.500 225,000 337,500
Group President 1995-1997 112,500 225,000 337,500
G. S. Flaherty 1996-1998 112.500 225,000 337,500
Group President 1995-1997 112,500 225,000 337,500
J. W. Owens 1996-1998 95,000 190,000 285,000
Group President 1995-1997 95,000 190,000 285,000
R. L. Thompson 1996-1998 95,000 190,000 285,000
Group President 1995-1997 95,000 190,000 285,000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Payout is based upon an executive's base salary at the end of the three-
year cycle, a predetermined percentage of that salary, and the Company's
achievement of specified levels of after-tax return on assets ("ROA") over the
three year period. The target amount will be earned if 100% of targeted ROA is
achieved. The threshold amount will be earned if 50% of targeted ROA is
achieved, and the maximum award amount will be earned at 150% of targeted ROA.
Base salary levels for 1996 were used to calculate the estimated dollar value of
future payments under both cycles.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pension Plan Table
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration Years of Service
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 20 25 30 35
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 100,000 $ 22,500 $ 30,000 $ 37,500 $ 45,000 $ 52,500
$ 150,000 33,750 45,000 56,250 67,500 78,750
$ 200,000 45,000 60,000 75,000 90,000 105,000
$ 250,000 56,250 75,000 93,750 112,500 131,250
$ 300,000 67,500 90,000 112,500 135,000 157,500
$ 350,000 78,750 105,000 131,250 157,500 183,750
$ 400,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 180,000 210,000
$ 450,000 101,250 135,000 168,750 202,500 236,250
$ 500,000 112,500 150,000 187,500 225,000 262,500
$ 550,000 123,750 165,000 206,250 247,500 288,750
$ 650,000 146,250 195,000 243,750 292,500 341,250
$ 750,000 168,750 225,000 281,250 337,500 393,750
$ 850,000 191,250 255,000 318,750 382,500 446,250
$ 950,000 213,750 285,000 356,250 427,500 498,750
$ 1,100,000 247,500 330,000 412,500 495,000 577,500
$ 1,400,000 315,000 420,000 525,000 630,000 735,000
$ 1,600,000 360,000 480,000 600,000 720,000 840,000
$ 1,950,000 438,750 585,000 731,250 877,500 1,023,750
$ 2,500,000 562,500 750,000 937,500 1,125,000 1,312,500
$ 3,000,000 675,000 900,000 1,125,000 1,350,000 1,575,000
$ 3,500,000 787,500 1,050,000 1,312,500 1,575,000 1,837,500
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
The compensation covered by the pension program is based on an employee's
annual salary and bonus. Amounts payable pursuant to a defined benefit
supplementary pension plan are included. As of December 31, 1996, the persons
named in the Summary Compensation Table had the following estimated credited
years of benefit service for purposes of the pension program: D. V. Fites -35
years*; G. A. Barton - 35 years*; G. S. Flaherty - 35 years*; J. W. Owens -24
years; and R. L. Thompson - 14 years. The amounts payable under the pension
program are computed on the basis of an ordinary life annuity and are not
subject to deductions for Social Security benefits or other amounts.
- ------------------
* Although having served more than 35 years with the Company, amounts
payable under the plan are based on a maximum of 35 years of service.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTAIN RELATED TRANSACTIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Siegfried R. Ramseyer, a Vice President of the Company, was Managing
Director of Caterpillar Overseas S.A. ("Subsidiary") until December 31, 1992,
and is indebted to that Subsidiary in the amount of approximately $302,826. The
loan is for a home purchased by Mr. Ramseyer in Switzerland and is
collateralized by a mortgage on the property. The primary purpose of the
transaction was to permit Mr. Ramseyer to retain his home in Switzerland and to
purchase a home in the United States where he has been assigned. The loan is
interest free and repayable to the Subsidiary no later than December 31, 2002.
If for any reason Mr. Ramseyer returns to Switzerland or ceases to act as a
Vice President of the Company prior to December 31, 2002, the Subsidiary is
entitled to request repayment of the loan upon giving 60 days prior written
notice. During Mr. Ramseyer's assignment in the United States, the Subsidiary
may lease the property and receive rental income.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPOINTMENT OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors seeks from the stockholders an indication of their
approval or disapproval of the Board's appointment of Price Waterhouse LLP
("Price Waterhouse") as independent auditors for 1997.
Price Waterhouse has been the independent auditors of the Company since
1925, and no relationship exists other than the usual relationship between
independent public accountant and client.
If the appointment of Price Waterhouse as independent auditors for 1997 is
not approved by the stockholders, the adverse vote will be considered a
direction to the Board of Directors to consider other auditors for next year.
However, because of the difficulty in making any substitution of auditors so
long after the beginning of the current year, the appointment for the year 1997
will stand unless the Board finds other good reason for making a change.
16
<PAGE>
Representatives of Price Waterhouse will be available at the annual meeting
of stockholders to respond to questions.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL AND CATERPILLAR RESPONSE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Seamus P. Finn, O.M.I., advises that, on behalf of The Missionary
Oblates of Mary Immaculate, the "Society of Oblate Fathers for Missions among
the Poor" ("Oblate Fathers") (owners of 800 shares of Company stock), he or
another representative intends to present for consideration and action at the
annual meeting the following resolution. Co-sponsor of this proposal is Ms.
Nancy Finnernan, on behalf of the Sisters of Loretto (Loretto Literary and
Benevolent Institution) (owners of 300 shares of Company stock).
RESOLUTION PROPOSED BY STOCKHOLDER
BE IT RESOLVED: the shareholders request the Board to review and develop
guidelines for country selection and report these guidelines to shareholders
and employees by September 1997. In its review, the Board shall develop
guidelines on maintaining investments in or withdrawing from countries where:
. there is a pattern of ongoing and systematic violation of human
rights
. a government is illegitimate
. there is a call by human rights advocates, pro-democracy
organizations or legitimately elected representatives for economic
sanctions against their country
SUPPORTING STATEMENT OF PROPONENT
WHEREAS: Levi Strauss & Co. bases its decision on whether to do business in
certain countries based on criteria that include whether:
"Brand image would be adversely affected by a country's perception or image
among our customers and/or consumers"
"Human rights environment would prevent us from conducting business
activities in a manner that is consistent with the Global Sourcing Guidelines
and other Company policies"
"Political, economic and social environment would threaten the Company's
reputation and/or commercial interests"
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and Burmese democracy movement leader Aung San
Suu Kyi has specifically called for economic sanctions on Burma;
17
<PAGE>
Hoppenstedt Affiliations reported that Caterpillar has a wholly owned
subsidiary in Burma. The Bangkok Nation reported that Caterpillar employs about
200 Burmese;
The New Light of Myanmar reported that a delegation led by a Burmese
military junta minister visited Caterpillar plants in the US in April, 1996;
The Delhi Financial Express reported on October 5, 1996, that Myanmar
Tractors & Trading Co Ltd, a dealer for Caterpillar in Burma, secured orders
worth $40 million from the Burmese Defense Ministry;
In its June 1996 "Foreign Economic Trends" report, the US Embassy in Burma
stated that: "In mid-1996, representatives of a U.S.-based manufacturer
indicated that their firm had recently sold US $30 million of dual-use heavy
construction equipment to the Defense Ministry's Directorate of Procurement."
(The term "dual-use" indicates equipment that can be used for either civilian
or military purposes.);
Eight cities - Ann Arbor (MI), Berkeley (CA), Carrboro (NC), Madison (WI),
Oakland (CA), San Francisco (CA), Santa Monica (CA), Takoma Park (MD) - and the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts have enacted laws that effectively prohibit
municipal or state purchases of products from companies, including Caterpillar,
that do business in Burma. Similar Burma-related legislation is pending in
other cities including New York City;
In September 1996, President Clinton signed into law a measure that
included a conditional ban on new US investment in Burma despite lobbying by
Caterpillar and other companies;
Caterpillar also does business in other countries with controversial human
rights records: China and Indonesia.
STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSAL
As a company that manufactures and distributes on a global scale,
Caterpillar competes in a world composed of differing races, religions,
cultures, customs, political philosophies, languages, economic resources, and
geography. We must respect these differences and realize that neither we nor the
United States can impose its values on the world.
It is not our purpose to remake the world in the image of any political,
moral or religious philosophy with which we may be comfortable. Rather, we hope
to help improve the quality of life, wherever we do business, by serving as a
means of developing infrastructure and natural resources and transmitting
knowledge that has been found useful elsewhere, thereby creating jobs and
better living conditions.
The additional standards suggested by the proponents for determining
whether business should be conducted in a particular country would put
Caterpillar in the business of making political decisions. We are being asked to
investigate and determine whether there is a "systematic violation of human
rights" and decide whether "a government is illegitimate." We believe these are
decisions to be made by international entities such as the United Nations and
perhaps, governmental authorities, not individual persons or companies. Where
the United States government
18
<PAGE>
has mandated that U.S. companies refrain from commerce, we have complied, often
to the advantage of our foreign competitors. History has shown that single
country, let alone corporate boycotts and sanctions, are ineffective, injuring
the economic interests of the boycotting entity.
We do not always agree with the policies or actions of governments in every
place we operate. However, due to the long-term nature of our business and the
inevitability of political and social change, we long ago concluded that it is
neither prudent nor appropriate for us to establish our own country-by-country
foreign policy. The proposal would put us in the untenable position of having
to assess and respond to any number of political and ideological disagreements
which may arise wherever we do business.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER MATTERS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Based upon a review of our records, all reports required to be filed
pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were filed on a timely basis.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 1998 ANNUAL MEETING
If you want to submit proposals for possible inclusion in the Company's
1998 Proxy Statement, you must do so on or before October 31, 1997.
SOLICITATION
Caterpillar is soliciting this proxy on behalf of its Board of Directors.
This solicitation is being made by mail but also may be made by telephone or in
person. We have hired Georgeson & Co. for $20,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses,
to assist in the solicitation.
STOCKHOLDER LIST
A stockholder list will be available for your examination during normal
business hours at the Loews Coronado, 4000 Coronado Bay, Coronado, California,
at least ten days prior to the annual meeting.
REVOCABILITY OF PROXY
You may revoke the enclosed proxy by filing a written notice of revocation
with the Company or by providing a later executed proxy.
19
<PAGE>
Notes
20
<PAGE>
APPENDIX
CATERPILLAR INC.
GENERAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1996
A-1
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C>
Report of Management............................................... A-3
Report of Independent Accountants.................................. A-3
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes........................ A-4
Eleven-year Financial Summary...................................... A-26
Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)
Results of Operations
-- 1996 Compared with 1995................................. A-28
-- 1995 Compared with 1994................................. A-32
Liquidity & Capital Resources................................... A-32
Employment...................................................... A-33
Other Matters................................................... A-33
1997 Economic and Industry Outlook.............................. A-35
1997 Company Outlook............................................ A-35
Supplemental Stockholder Information............................... A-37
Directors and Officers............................................. A-38
</TABLE>
A-2
<PAGE>
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The management of Caterpillar Inc. has prepared the accompanying consolidated
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, and
is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and, reflecting
management's best judgment, present fairly the company's results of operations,
financial position and cash flow.
Management maintains a system of internal accounting controls which has been
designed to provide reasonable assurance that: transactions are executed in
accordance with proper authorization, transactions are properly recorded and
summarized to produce reliable financial records and reports, assets are
safeguarded and the accountability for assets is maintained.
The system of internal controls includes statements of policies and business
practices, widely communicated to employees, which are designed to require them
to maintain high ethical standards in their conduct of company affairs. The
internal controls are augmented by careful selection and training of supervisory
and other management personnel, by organizational arrangements that provide for
appropriate delegation of authority and division of responsibility and by an
extensive program of internal audit with management follow-up.
The financial statements have been audited by Price Waterhouse LLP,
independent accountants, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. They have made similar annual audits since initial incorporation of
the company. Their role is to render an objective, independent opinion on
management's financial statements. Their report appears below.
Through its Audit Committee, the board of directors reviews the company's
financial and accounting policies, practices and reports. The Audit Committee
consists exclusively of five directors who are not salaried employees and who
are, in the opinion of the board of directors, free from any relationship that
would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member.
The Audit Committee meets several times each year with representatives of
management, including the internal auditing department, and the independent
accountants to review the activities of each and satisfy itself that each is
properly discharging its responsibilities. Both the independent accountants and
the internal auditors have free access to the Audit Committee and meet with it
periodically, with and without management representatives in attendance, to
discuss, among other things, their opinions as to the adequacy of internal
controls and to review the quality of financial reporting.
/s/ Donald V. Fites
Chairman of the Board
/s/ Douglas R. Oberhelman
Chief Financial Officer
January 21, 1997
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
[LOGO APPEARS HERE]
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF CATERPILLAR INC.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements, in
Statements 1 through 4, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Caterpillar Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated
cash flow for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
Peoria, Illinois
January 21, 1997
A-3
<PAGE>
STATEMENT 1
Consolidated Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31
(Millions of dollars except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery and Engines:
Sales (note 1B)................................ $15,814 $15,451 $13,863
------- ------- -------
Operating costs:
Cost of goods sold........................... 11,832 12,000 10,834
Selling, general and administrative expenses. 1,715 1,483 1,348
Research and development expenses (note 4)... 410 375 311
------- ------- -------
13,957 13,858 12,493
------- ------- -------
Operating profit............................... 1,857 1,593 1,370
Interest expense............................... 194 191 200
------- ------- -------
1,663 1,402 1,170
Other income (expense) (note 6)................ 127 92 43
------- ------- -------
Profit before taxes............................ 1,790 1,494 1,213
------- ------- -------
Financial Products:
Revenues (note 1B)............................. 708 621 465
------- ------- -------
Operating costs:
Selling, general and administrative expenses. 278 240 191
Interest expense............................. 316 293 210
------- ------- -------
594 533 401
------- ------- -------
Operating profit............................... 114 88 64
Other income (expense) (note 6)................ 37 33 (4)
------- ------- -------
Profit before taxes............................ 151 121 60
------- ------- -------
Consolidated profit before taxes................. 1,941 1,615 1,273
Provision for income taxes (note 7)............ 613 501 354
------- ------- -------
Profit of consolidated companies............... 1,328 1,114 919
Equity in profit of unconsolidated affiliated
companies (notes 1A and 11)................... 33 22 36
------- ------- -------
Profit......................................... $ 1,361 $ 1,136 $ 955
======= ======= =======
Profit per share of common stock................. $ 7.07 $ 5.72 $ 4.70
======= ======= =======
Dividends declared per share of common stock..... $ 1.55 $ 1.30 $ .63
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-4
<PAGE>
STATEMENT 2 Caterpillar Inc.
Changes in Consolidated Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31
(Dollars in millions)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common stock (note 18):
Balance at beginning of year.................................. $ 333 $ 745 $ 835
Common shares issued, including treasury shares reissued:
1996 - 743,996; 1995 - 713,131; 1994 - 1,144,631............ 21 15 48
Treasury shares purchased:
1996 - 4,408,004; 1995 - 7,140,100; 1994 - 4,426,200........ (304) (427) (240)
Issuance of common stock to effect 2-for-1 stock split........ -- -- 102
------ ------ ------
Balance at year-end........................................... 50 333 745
------ ------ ------
Profit employed in the business:
Balance at beginning of year.................................. 2,840 1,961 1,234
Profit........................................................ 1,361 1,136 955
Dividends declared............................................ (297) (257) (126)
Issuance of common stock to effect 2-for-1 stock split........ -- -- (102)
------ ------ ------
Balance at year-end........................................... 3,904 2,840 1,961
------ ------ ------
Foreign currency translation adjustment (note 3):
Balance at beginning of year.................................. 215 205 170
Aggregate adjustment for year................................. (53) 10 35
------ ------ ------
Balance at year-end........................................... 162 215 205
------ ------ ------
Stockholders' equity at year-end................................ $4,116 $3,388 $2,911
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-5
<PAGE>
STATEMENT 3
Financial Position at December 31
(Dollars in millions)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated
(Caterpillar Inc. and subsidiaries)
-----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and short-term investments...................................... $ 487 $ 638 $ 419
Receivables--trade and other......................................... 2,956 2,531 2,971
Receivables--finance (note 8)........................................ 2,266 1,754 1,319
Deferred income taxes and prepaid expenses (note 7).................. 852 803 865
Inventories (notes 1C and 9)......................................... 2,222 1,921 1,835
-----------------------------------
Total current assets................................................... 8,783 7,647 7,409
Land, buildings, machinery and equipment--net (notes 1D and 10)........ 3,767 3,644 3,776
Long-term receivables--trade and other................................. 128 126 125
Long-term receivables--finance (note 8)................................ 3,380 3,066 2,669
Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies (notes 1A and 11)... 701 476 455
Investments in Financial Products subsidiaries......................... -- -- --
Deferred income taxes (note 7)......................................... 1,093 1,127 1,243
Intangible assets (notes 1E and 5A).................................... 233 170 237
Other assets (note 20)................................................. 643 574 336
-----------------------------------
Total assets............................................................. $18,728 $16,830 $16,250
===================================
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings (note 13)...................................... $ 1,747 $ 1,174 $ 740
Accounts payable and accrued expenses................................ 2,858 2,579 2,624
Accrued wages, salaries and employee benefits........................ 1,010 875 1,047
Dividends payable.................................................... 76 68 50
Deferred and current income taxes payable (note 7)................... 142 91 144
Long-term debt due within one year (note 14)......................... 1,180 1,262 893
-----------------------------------
Total current liabilities.............................................. 7,013 6,049 5,498
Long-term debt due after one year (note 14)............................ 4,532 3,964 4,270
Liability for postemployment benefits (note 5)......................... 3,019 3,393 3,548
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities (note 7)................... 48 36 23
-----------------------------------
Total liabilities........................................................ 14,612 13,442 13,339
-----------------------------------
Contingencies (notes 17, 20 and 21)
Stockholders' equity (Statement 2)
Common stock of $1.00 par value (note 18):
Authorized shares: 450,000,000
Issued shares (1996, 1995 and 1994--203,723,656)
at paid-in amount.................................................. 881 901 923
Profit employed in the business........................................ 3,904 2,840 1,961
Foreign currency translation adjustment (note 3)....................... 162 215 205
Treasury stock (1996--13,372,546 shares; 1995--9,708,538 shares;
and 1994--3,281,569 shares) at cost.................................. (831) (568) (178)
-----------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity............................................... 4,116 3,388 2,911
-----------------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................... $18,728 $16,830 $16,250
===================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-6
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Supplemental consolidating data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machinery and Engines/1/ Financial Products
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 445 $ 580 $ 395 $ 42 $ 58 $ 24
2,960 2,910 2,919 175 132 96
-- -- -- 2,266 1,754 1,319
876 834 888 15 13 3
2,222 1,921 1,835 -- -- --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,503 6,245 6,037 2,498 1,957 1,442
3,242 3,199 3,343 525 445 433
128 126 125 -- -- --
-- -- -- 3,380 3,066 2,669
701 476 455 -- -- --
759 658 548 -- -- --
1,132 1,171 1,254 3 -- --
233 170 237 -- -- --
368 330 143 275 244 193
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$13,066 $12,375 $12,142 $ 6,681 $ 5,712 $ 4,737
================================================================================
$ 36 $ 14 $ 17 $ 1,711 $ 1,160 $ 723
2,556 2,358 2,416 520 776 278
1,005 873 1,045 5 2 2
76 68 50 -- -- --
70 40 112 72 51 32
122 156 86 1,058 1,106 807
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,865 3,509 3,726 3,366 3,095 1,842
2,018 2,049 1,934 2,514 1,915 2,336
3,019 3,393 3,548 -- -- --
48 36 23 42 44 11
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8,950 8,987 9,231 5,922 5,054 4,189
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
881 901 923 353 333 303
3,904 2,840 1,961 404 320 245
162 215 205 2 5 --
(831) (568) (178) -- -- --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,116 3,388 2,911 759 658 548
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$13,066 $12,375 $12,142 $ 6,681 $ 5,712 $ 4,737
================================================================================
</TABLE>
/1/Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries except for Financial
Products, which is accounted for on the equity basis.
The supplemental consolidating data is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to provide required supplemental disclosure of information about
the Financial Products subsidiaries. See note 1A on page A-10 for a definition
of the groupings in these statements.
A-7
<PAGE>
STATEMENT 4
Statement of Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31
(Millions of dollars)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated
(Caterpillar Inc. and subsidiaries)
-----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flow from operating activities:
Profit.....................................$ 1,361 $ 1,136 $ 955
Adjustments for noncash items:
Depreciation and amortization............ 696 682 683
Profit of Financial Products............. -- -- --
Other.................................... 158 324 166
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables - trade and other............ (319) 461 (308)
Inventories.............................. (111) (77) (315)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.... 134 (43) 519
Other - net.............................. (137) (293) 57
-----------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities.... 1,782 2,190 1,757
-----------------------------------
Cash flow from investing activities:
Capital expenditures - excluding equipment
leased to others.......................... (506) (464) (501)
Expenditures for equipment leased to others (265) (215) (193)
Proceeds from disposals of land, buildings,
machinery and equipment................... 135 119 88
Additions to finance receivables........... (5,802) (4,869) (2,934)
Collections of finance receivables......... 3,407 2,787 1,850
Proceeds from sale of finance receivables.. 1,425 1,262 241
Net short-term loans to Financial Products. -- -- --
Investments and acquisitions............... (612) (21) --
Other - net................................ (166) (348) (63)
-----------------------------------
Net cash used for investing activities....... (2,384) (1,749) (1,512)
-----------------------------------
Cash flow from financing activities:
Dividends paid............................. (289) (239) (91)
Common stock issued, including treasury
shares reissued........................... 10 11 12
Treasury shares purchased.................. (303) (427) (240)
Net short-term loans from Machinery
and Engines............................... -- -- --
Proceeds from long-term debt issued........ 1,088 1,414 1,083
Payments on long-term debt................. (1,335) (997) (746)
Short-term borrowings - net................ 1,262 30 74
-----------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used for) financing
activities.................................. 433 (208) 92
-----------------------------------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash...... 18 (14) (1)
-----------------------------------
(Decrease) increase in cash and short-term
investments................................. (151) 219 336
Cash and short-term investments at the
beginning of the period..................... 638 419 83
-----------------------------------
Cash and short-term investments at the end
of the period...............................$ 487 $ 638 $ 419
===================================
</TABLE>
All short-term investments, which consist primarily of highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less, are considered to be cash
equivalents.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-8
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Supplemental consolidating data
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machinery and Engines/1/ Financial Products
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 1,361 $ 1,136 $ 955 $ 96 $ 75 $ 39
575 580 588 121 102 95
(96) (75) (39) -- -- --
118 233 126 43 91 40
(298) 505 (281) (14) (36) (33)
(111) (77) (315) -- -- --
57 (28) 471 65 (5) 47
(143) (328) 73 20 17 (9)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,463 1,946 1,578 331 244 179
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(500) (460) (498) (6) (4) (3)
(8) (9) (9) (257) (206) (184)
21 35 15 114 84 73
-- -- -- (5,802) (4,869) (2,934)
-- -- -- 3,407 2,787 1,850
-- -- -- 1,425 1,262 241
325 (475) -- -- -- --
(612) (21) -- -- -- --
(153) (338) (81) (33) (40) (27)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(927) (1,268) (573) (1,152) (986) (984)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(289) (239) (91) (12) -- --
10 11 12 20 30 45
(303) (427) (240) -- -- --
-- -- -- (325) 475 --
37 270 -- 1,051 1,144 1,083
(166) (91) (240) (1,169) (906) (506)
18 (3) (112) 1,244 33 186
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(693) (479) (671) 809 776 808
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
22 (14) (1) (4) -- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(135) 185 333 (16) 34 3
580 395 62 58 24 21
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 445 $ 580 $ 395 $ 42 $ 58 $ 24
=============================================================================
</TABLE>
/1/ Represents Caterpillar Inc. and its subsidiaries except for Financial
Products, which is accounted for on the equity basis.
The supplemental consolidating data is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to provide required supplemental disclosure of information about
the Financial Products subsidiaries. See note 1A on page A-10 for a definition
of the groupings in these statements.
A-9
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of Caterpillar
Inc. and all its subsidiaries (affiliated companies that are more than 50%
owned).
Investments in companies that are owned 50% or less are accounted for by the
equity method. Accordingly, the company's share of the profit or loss is
included in Statement 1 as "Equity in profit of unconsolidated affiliated
companies" and the company's investments in these affiliates, including its
share of their retained profits, are included in Statement 3 as "Investments in
unconsolidated affiliated companies." Financial information of the
unconsolidated affiliated companies is included in note 11.
Information in the accompanying financial statements and supplemental
consolidating data, where applicable, has been grouped as follows:
CONSOLIDATED - represents the consolidated data of Caterpillar Inc. and all
its subsidiaries.
MACHINERY AND ENGINES - company operations excluding the Financial Products
subsidiaries; consists primarily of the company's manufacturing, marketing and
parts distribution operations.
FINANCIAL PRODUCTS - the company's finance and insurance subsidiaries,
primarily Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and Caterpillar Insurance
Services Corporation.
Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform with the
current year financial statement presentation.
B. SALES AND REVENUE RECOGNITION
Sales of machines and engines are generally unconditional sales that are
recorded when product is shipped and invoiced to independently owned and
operated dealers or customers.
Revenues primarily represent finance and rental revenues of Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc.
Finance revenues are recognized over the term of the contract at a constant
rate of return on the scheduled uncollected principal balance, and rental
revenues are recognized in the period earned. Recognition of income is
suspended when collection of future income is not probable. Income recognition
is resumed if the receivable becomes contractually current and collection
doubts are removed; previously suspended income is recognized at that time.
C. INVENTORIES
The cost of inventories is determined principally by the LIFO (last-in,
first-out) method of inventory valuation. This method was first adopted for the
major portion of inventories in 1950. The value of inventories on the LIFO
basis represented approximately 85% of total inventories at current cost value
at December 31, 1996, and 90% at December 31, 1995 and 1994.
If the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method had been in use, inventories would
have been $2,123, $2,103 and $2,035 higher than reported at December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively.
D. DEPRECIATION
Depreciation is computed principally using accelerated methods. These
methods result in a larger allocation of the cost of buildings, machinery and
equipment to operations in the early years of the lives of assets than does the
straight-line method, which allocates costs evenly over the lives of assets.
When an asset becomes fully depreciated, its cost is eliminated from both
the asset and the accumulated depreciation accounts.
E. AMORTIZATION
The cost of purchased intangibles is amortized using the straight-line
method. Amortization periods are based on estimated remaining useful lives. The
company's policy is to amortize most intangibles over 25 years or less.
When a purchased intangible becomes fully amortized, its cost is eliminated
from both the asset and the accumulated amortization accounts.
F. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative financial instruments are principally used by the company in the
management of its interest rate, foreign currency and commodity exposures.
Except as described in note 3, derivative instruments are not reflected in the
financial statements at fair market value. Amounts payable or receivable under
interest rate swap agreements are recognized as adjustments to interest expense
in the periods in which they accrue. Gains and losses on foreign currency
instruments that hedge net balance sheet exposures and anticipated cash flow
during the next 12 months are also recognized in the results of operations as
they accrue. Gains and losses, including net premiums paid, related to
effective hedges of identifiable firm foreign currency commitments are deferred
and recognized in the financial statements in the same period as the hedged
transaction. Net premiums paid for derivative financial instruments not
designated as effective hedges of identifiable firm foreign currency
commitments are deferred and recognized ratably over the life of the instrument.
G. USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales,
expenses and disclosure of contingent liabilities. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
Warranty accruals and actuarially determined product liability loss
reserves and postemployment benefits require the use of significant estimates.
The company believes the techniques and assumptions used in establishing these
liabilities are appropriate.
Significant estimates are also used in the determination of environmental
liabilities, income taxes and plant closing and consolidation costs, which are
discussed in the respective notes to the financial statements.
2. ACCOUNTING CHANGES
A. CHANGE IN METHOD
In the first quarter of 1994, the company changed its method of computing
LIFO inventories from a single pool approach to a multiple pool approach for
substantially all of its inventories. The company believes that the multiple
pool method results in a better matching of revenues and expenses. The
cumulative effect of the change on prior years was not determinable. This
A-10
<PAGE>
CATERPILLAR INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
change did not have a material effect on 1994 results of operations or
financial position.
B. IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED IN 1996
In June 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 125, "Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities." This statement establishes new criteria for determining whether a
transfer of financial assets should be accounted for as a sale or as a secured
borrowing. The accounting treatment of such transactions focuses on who
controls the transferred assets, and whether or not those assets have been
isolated from the transferor and put beyond the reach of its creditors. This
standard is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996, and will
therefore be adopted in 1997. It will not have a material impact on the
company's financial position or results of operations.
3. FOREIGN EXCHANGE
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for most of Caterpillar's
Machinery and Engines consolidated companies. The functional currency for most
Financial Products subsidiaries and equity-basis companies is the local
currency of the country in which the company is located. Net foreign exchange
gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign currency amounts to
the functional currency are included in "Other income (expense)" in Statement
1. Exchange effects resulting from translating all assets and liabilities from
the functional currency to the U.S. dollar at current exchange rates are
reported as "Foreign currency translation adjustment" in Statements 2 and 3.
Profit of consolidated companies for 1996 and 1995 included net pretax
foreign exchange gains (losses) of $1 and $(20), respectively. There were no
net pretax foreign exchange gains or losses included in profit of consolidated
companies for 1994. The aftertax net gains (losses) for 1996, 1995 and 1994
were $1, $(11) and $1, respectively. Certain gains or losses may impact either
taxes or pretax income, when stated in U.S. dollars, without impacting the
other and; accordingly, the relationship between the pretax and aftertax
effects may be disproportionate.
The company's Machinery and Engines operations are subject to foreign
exchange risk through future foreign currency cash flow as movement in currency
exchange rates impact: (1) the U.S. dollar value of sales made in foreign
currencies and (2) the U.S. dollar value of costs incurred in foreign
currencies. The company may enter into forward exchange contracts and certain
foreign currency option contracts to manage this foreign currency cash flow.
The company also enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge the net
foreign currency balance sheet exposures of its Financial Products
subsidiaries. Other than premiums associated with foreign currency option
contracts, gains or losses on this hedging activity are realized in the form of
cash receipts or payments at the maturity of the contracts.
Realized and unrealized gains or losses on all financial instruments which
are designated as, and are effective as, hedges of firmly committed future
foreign currency transactions are deferred and recognized in the financial
statements when the transaction or event being hedged is recognized. The cash
flow from these transactions is classified consistent with the cash flow for
the transaction or event being hedged. Similar accounting treatment is applied
to gains and losses on purchased foreign currency option hedges of probable net
anticipated foreign currency transactions. In those situations where these
financial instruments are either terminated or mature prior to the transaction
or event being hedged, the gains or losses continue to be deferred until the
transaction or event being hedged is recognized. Conversely, deferred gains and
losses are recognized in the results of operations immediately when the hedged
firmly committed or anticipated transaction is no longer anticipated to occur.
At December 31, 1996, the company had approximately $27 in foreign currency
option contracts to sell foreign currency to hedge firmly committed revenue
(sale) transactions.
Gains or losses on financial instruments, other than certain purchased
foreign currency options, used as hedges of anticipated but not firmly
committed foreign currency cash flow exposures and balance sheet positions are
reported in the results of operations as exchange rates change and included
with amounts reported in "Other income (expense)" in Statement 1. At December
31, 1996, the company had approximately $911 in forward exchange and foreign
currency option contracts to buy or sell foreign currency to hedge net foreign
currency balance sheet positions and anticipated, but not firmly committed,
net foreign currency cash flow exposures for the next 12 months.
The company also had $122 of cross-currency option and forward exchange
contracts to hedge European currency cash flow against the Deutsche mark. The
company uses the Deutsche mark to manage its European currency cash flow
exposure. These cross-currency contracts, which all mature within the first six
months of 1997, were entered into to hedge the risk associated with exchange
rate movements between the European currency cash flow exposure and the
Deutsche mark.
For all contracts not qualifying for deferred accounting treatment, net
unrealized losses total $3 and have been recognized in "Other income (expense)"
in Statement 1. Unrealized losses of $13 are reflected as a liability
("Accounts payable and accrued expenses") in Statement 3. Unrealized gains of
$10 are reflected as an asset ("Receivables - trade and other") in Statement 3.
The fair market value of all outstanding forward exchange and foreign
currency option contracts based on quoted market prices of comparable
instruments was a loss of $3. The value of the contracts upon ultimate
settlement is dependent upon actual currency exchange rates at the various
maturity dates. The maturity dates for virtually all of the outstanding
contracts range through mid-1997.
At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the company had approximately $219 and
$1,003, respectively, in forward exchange and foreign currency option contracts
to buy or sell foreign currency. At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the carrying
value of such contracts was a loss of zero and $4, respectively, and the fair
value, based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments, was a loss of
$1 and $97, respectively.
For the first half of 1994, net foreign exchange gains arising from
operations in Brazil's highly inflationary economy were removed from "Other
income (expense)" in Statement 1 and included on the operating statement lines
where the related inflationary effects were reported. Consequently, exchange
gains and losses on local currency denominated debt and cash deposits, where
the interest rates reflect the rate of inflation, were offset
A-11
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
against interest expense and interest income, respectively. Similarly, exchange
gains on local currency liabilities subject to monetary correction were offset
against the related expense. Additionally, in the first half of 1994,
noninterest bearing trade receivables in Brazil were discounted to present value
with the implicit interest income reported as a component of interest income.
Exchange losses on these receivables were offset against interest income. These
reclassifications were no longer applicable in 1996, 1995 or the second half of
1994 as inflation in Brazil dropped dramatically following the implementation of
a new economic reform package. Exchange gains and losses were reclassified as
follows:
1994
-----
Interest expense...................................................... $ 10
Cost of goods sold.................................................... 29
Provision for income taxes............................................ 10
Interest income....................................................... (53)
-----
$ (4)
=====
4. RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING EXPENSES
Research and engineering expenses are charged against operations as
incurred. The portions of these expenses related to new product development and
major improvements to existing products are classified as "Research and
development expenses" in Statement 1. The remaining portions, attributable to
engineering expenses incurred during the early production phase, as well as
ongoing efforts to improve existing products, are included in "Cost of goods
sold" in Statement 1.
5. POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS
A. PENSION PLANS
The company has pension plans covering substantially all employees. These
defined benefit plans provide a benefit based on years of service and/or the
employee's average earnings near retirement. The company's funding policy for
these plans is to contribute amounts which comply with applicable laws and
regulations and are tax deductible.
Cost components of consolidated pension expense were as follows:
1996 1995 1994
_________ _________ _________
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period................... $110 $ 95 $108
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation.................. 417 409 393
Return on plan assets:/(1)/
Actual.....................$(1,023) $(1,167) $(124)
Deferred................... 491 685 (335)
------- ------- ------
Recognized....................... (532) (482) (459)
Amortization of:
Net asset existing at
adoption of SFAS 87............... (22) (23) (22)
Prior service cost/(2)/............. 63 63 60
Net actuarial (gain) loss........... (1) (12) 1
---- ---- ----
Pension expense....................... $ 35 $ 50 $ 81
==== ==== ====
/(1)/ Although the actual return on plan assets is shown, the expected long-
term rate of return on plan assets was used in determining consolidated
pension expense. The difference between the actual return and the
recognized return on plan assets is shown as deferred return on plan
assets.
/(2)/ Prior service costs are amortized using a straight-line method over the
average remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits from the plan amendment.
The following assumptions were utilized in determining the costs and benefit
obligations for the pension plans:
Actuarial assumptions (December 31) 1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Weighted average discount rate............. 7.4% 7.4% 8.3%
Expected annual rate of increase
in future compensation................... 4.2% 4.1% 4.6%
Expected long-term rate
of return on plan assets................. 9.4% 9.4% 9.4%
Plan assets consist principally of common stocks, corporate bonds and U.S.
government obligations.
A reconciliation of the funded status of both U.S. and non-U.S. pension
plans at their plan year-end (November 30 for U.S. plans and September 30 for
non-U.S. plans) with the amount recognized in Statement 3 is presented in Table
I on Page A-13.
For certain pension plans with accumulated benefits in excess of plan
assets, an additional long-term liability was recorded as required by SFAS 87.
This amount is included in Table I as "Adjustment required to recognize minimum
liability." A related intangible asset of $3, $130 and $209 was recorded at
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
A point-in-time comparison of the projected benefit obligation to the market
value of assets is only one indicator of the pension plans' ability to pay
benefits when due. The benefit information is based on estimated conditions
over many future years, while the asset information relates to market values
prevailing at a specific moment. The plans' long-range ability to pay benefits
also depends on the future financial health of the company.
B. OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The company has defined benefit retirement health care and life insurance
plans for substantially all U.S. employees. Most of the plans are
non-contributory although some plans require retiree contributions. During
1992, the company made several changes to its retiree health care plans.
Included in those changes were the establishment of limits on the company's
costs related to substantially all future retirees' health care benefits. Such
limits will be effective January 1, 2000.
Cost components of postretirement benefit expense were as follows:
1996 1995 1994
-------- --------- --------
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period...................... $81 $ 73 $ 83
Interest cost on accumulated
benefit obligation..................... 226 232 223
Return on plan assets:/(1)/
Actual...................... $ (74) $ (58) $ 3
Deferred.................... 48 34 (26)
----- ----- ----
Recognized........................... (26) (24) (23)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost/(2)/................ (190) (190) (190)
Net actuarial (gain) loss.............. (1) (3) 2
---- ---- ----
Postretirement benefit expense........... $ 90 $ 88 $ 95
==== ==== ====
/(1)/ Although the actual return on plan assets is shown, the expected long-
term rate of return on plan assets was used in determining consolidated
postretirement benefit expense. The difference between the actual return
and the recognized return on plan assets is shown as deferred return on
plan assets.
/(2)/ Prior service costs are amortized using a straight-line method over the
average remaining service period of employees impacted by the plan
amendment.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CATERPILLAR INC.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE I
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets Exceed Accumulated Benefits
Accumulated Benefits Exceed Assets
--------------------------------- --------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of:
Vested benefit obligation............................... $ (3,114) $ (2,844) $ (2,379) $ (2,095) $ (2,124) $ (1,823)
Nonvested benefit obligation............................ (146) (142) (146) (364) (383) (402)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Accumulated benefit obligation.......................... $ (3,260) $ (2,986) $ (2,525) $ (2,459) $ (2,507) $ (2,225)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Actuarial present value of projected benefit obligation.. $ (3,603) $ (3,310) $ (2,829) $ (2,479) $ (2,533) $ (2,248)
Plan assets at market value.............................. 4,500 3,917 3,310 2,430 2,282 1,810
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Funded status at plan year-end........................... 897 607 481 (49) (251) (438)
Unrecognized net asset existing at adoption of SFAS 87... (75) (93) (114) (2) (5) (9)
Unrecognized prior service cost.......................... 153 155 158 166 233 279
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss................... (656) (418) (342) (238) (74) (45)
Adjustment required to recognize minimum liability....... - - - (3) (130) (209)
-------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ---------
Prepaid pension cost (pension liability) at December 31.. $ 319 $ 251 $ 183 $ (126) $ (227) $ (422)
======== ======== ======== ========== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The following assumptions were utilized in determining the costs and benefit
obligations for postretirement benefits (other than pensions):
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS (DECEMBER 31) 1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Weighted average discount rate............. 7.5% 7.5% 8.5%
Expected annual rate of increase
in future compensation................... 4.0% 4.0% 4.5%
Assumed health care cost trend rate/(1)/... 7.9%/(2)/ 8.7%/(3)/ 9.4%/(3)/
Expected long-term rate
of return on plan assets................. 9.5% 9.5% 9.5%
/(1)/ Rate is used to measure the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation
at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, and was used to
determine the postretirement benefit expense for 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
/(2)/ Gradually declining to 4.5% in 2002.
/(3)/ Gradually declining to 5.0% in 2001.
Plan assets consist principally of mutual funds, common stocks, corporate
bonds and government obligations.
The components of the liability for postretirement benefits (other than
pensions) as of December 31, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees....................................... $ (2,253) $ (2,149) $ (1,910)
Fully eligible active plan participants........ (502) (397) (242)
Other active plan participants................. (591) (485) (604)
-------- --------- --------
(3,346) (3,031) (2,756)
Plan assets at market value...................... 547 297 239
Unrecognized prior service cost.................. (289) (479) (669)
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss........... (49) (182) (265)
-------- -------- --------
Liability for postretirement benefits
(other than pensions).......................... $ (3,137) $ (3,395) $ (3,451)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Increasing the assumed health care trend rate by 1% each year would increase
the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994 approximately $210, $226 and $202, respectively, and the aggregate of
the service and interest cost components of 1996, 1995 and 1994 postretirement
benefit expense by approximately $22, $25 and $24, respectively.
The company makes contributions to Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary
Association (VEBA) trusts for payment of certain employee benefits for
substantially all active and retired U.S. employees. Postretirement benefits
funded through VEBA contributions include life insurance for hourly and
salaried employees and medical expenses for employees not enrolled in health
maintenance organizations. The company generally funds plan obligations on a
pay-as-you-go basis; however, in July of 1996 the company made a voluntary
contribution of $200. Balances in the VEBA trusts have accumulated over time
primarily from earnings on assets previously contributed to the trusts.
VEBA trust assets for retiree benefits are legally segregated from those for
active employees. As such, these assets are recorded as a reduction to the
liability for postretirement benefits. The return on plan assets are recorded
as a component of postretirement benefits expense.
C. OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The company offers various other postemployment benefits to substantially
all U.S. employees. These benefits are provided to former or inactive employees
after employment but before retirement, and are paid in accordance with the
company's established postemployment benefits policies. Postemployment benefits
include disability benefits, supplemental unemployment benefits, workers'
compensation benefits and continuation of health care benefits and life
insurance coverage.
D. SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM LIABILITY
The components of the long-term liability for postemployment benefits at
December 31 were as follows:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
Pensions.......................................... $ 3 $ 130 $ 209
Postretirement benefits other than pensions....... 2,948 3,199 3,275
Other postemployment benefits..................... 68 64 64
------ ------ ------
$3,019 $3,393 $3,548
====== ====== ======
A-13
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
The components of other income (expense) were as follows for the years ended
December 31:
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Foreign exchange gains (losses).............. $ 1 $(20) $ -
Investment and interest income............... 111 90 48
License fees................................. 26 28 23
Miscellaneous income (expense)............... 26 27 (32)
---- ---- ----
$164 $125 $ 39
==== ==== ====
7. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31 was:
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Machinery and Engines........................ $560 $456 $333
Financial Products........................... 53 45 21
---- ---- ----
Provision for income taxes................... $613 $501 $354
==== ==== ====
The components of the provision for income taxes were as follows for the
years ended December 31:
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Current tax provision:
U.S. federal taxes.......................... $399 $244 $164
Foreign taxes............................... 83 92 73
U.S. state taxes............................ 36 17 25
---- ---- ----
518 353 262
---- ---- ----
Deferred tax provision (credit):
U.S. federal taxes.......................... 86 147 87
Foreign taxes............................... 7 (6) (8)
U.S. state taxes............................ 2 7 13
---- ---- ----
95 148 92
---- ---- ----
Total provision for income taxes............. $613 $501 $354
==== ==== ====
Current tax provision is the amount of income taxes reported or expected to
be reported on the company's tax returns for the current year.
Income taxes paid in 1996, 1995 and 1994 totaled $452, $327 and $199,
respectively.
During 1996, the company reached a settlement with the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) covering tax years 1988 through 1991. As a result of this
settlement and a related reassessment of the company's tax liability for the
remaining open years, U.S. federal and U.S. state tax credits totaling $17 and
related net interest income of $2 were recorded.
Differences between accounting rules and tax laws cause differences between
the bases of certain assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes
and tax purposes. The tax effects of these differences, to the extent they are
temporary, are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities under SFAS 109
and consisted of the following components at December 31:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
U.S. federal, U.S. state, and foreign taxes:
Deferred tax assets:
Postemployment benefits other
than pensions............................ $1,212 $1,309 $1,331
Inventory valuation method................ 63 65 62
Unrealized profit excluded
from inventories......................... 176 170 156
Plant closing and
consolidation costs...................... 49 53 55
Net operating loss carryforwards.......... 101 150 166
Warranty reserves......................... 114 105 108
Accrued vacation.......................... 35 30 29
Qualified deficits........................ - - 33
Sales discounts........................... 41 18 12
Other..................................... 38 23 143
------ ------ ------
1,829 1,923 2,095
Deferred tax liabilities:
Capital assets............................. (91) (83) (84)
Pension.................................... (86) (91) (36)
------ ------ ------
(177) (174) (120)
------ ------ ------
Valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets........................ (149) (176) (182)
------ ------ ------
Deferred taxes - net......................... $1,503 $1,573 $1,793
====== ====== ======
From December 31, 1995 to December 31, 1996, the valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets decreased by $27. This was the result of origination and
reversal of temporary differences and changes in exchange rates and tax rates
at certain foreign locations where valuation allowances are recorded. During
1996, no changes occurred in the conclusions regarding the need for a valuation
allowance in any tax jurisdiction.
SFAS 109 requires that individual tax paying entities of the company offset
all current deferred tax liabilities and assets within each particular tax
jurisdiction and present them as a single amount in the Statement of Financial
Position. A similar procedure is followed for all noncurrent deferred tax
liabilities and assets. Amounts in different tax jurisdictions cannot be offset
against each other. Deferred taxes appear in Statement 3, at December 31, on
the following lines:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
Assets:
Deferred income taxes and
prepaid expenses......................... $ 444 $ 464 $ 575
Deferred income taxes...................... 1,093 1,127 1,243
------ ------ ------
1,537 1,591 1,818
------ ------ ------
Liabilities:
Deferred and current
income taxes payable..................... (10) (3) (6)
Deferred income taxes
and other liabilities.................... (24) (15) (19)
------ ------ ------
(34) (18) (25)
------ ------ ------
Deferred taxes - net......................... $1,503 $1,573 $1,793
====== ====== ======
The provision for income taxes was different than would result from applying
the U.S. statutory rate to profit before taxes for the reasons set forth in the
following reconciliation:
A-14
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Taxes computed at U.S. statutory rates................ $ 679 $ 565 $ 445
Increases (decreases) in taxes resulting from:
Subsidiaries' results subject to tax rates
other than U.S. statutory rates.................. 6 (7) (9)
Net operating loss carryforwards................... (12) (10) (50)
Benefit of Foreign Sales Corporation............... (49) (41) (34)
IRS settlement..................................... (17) -- --
State income taxes - net of federal taxes.......... 30 15 25
Valuation allowance adjustment..................... -- -- (22)
Research and experimentation credit................ (4) (4) --
Other - net........................................ (20) (17) (1)
----- ----- -----
Provision for income taxes............................ $ 613 $ 501 $ 354
===== ===== =====
U.S. income taxes, net of foreign taxes paid or payable, have been provided on
the undistributed profits of subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliated
companies, except in those instances where such profits have been permanently
invested and are not considered to be available for distribution to the parent
company. In accordance with this practice, the consolidated "Profit employed in
the business" in Statement 3 at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, included the
company's share of undistributed profits of subsidiaries and unconsolidated
affiliated companies, totaling $962, $932 and $753, respectively, on which U.S.
income taxes, net of foreign taxes paid or payable, have not been provided. If
for some reason not presently contemplated, such profits were to be remitted or
other wise become subject to U.S. income taxes, available credits would reduce
the amount of taxes otherwise due. Determination of the amount of unrecognized
deferred tax liability related to these permanently invested profits is not
practicable.
The domestic and foreign components of profit before taxes of consolidated
companies were as follows:
1996 1995 1994
----- ----- -----
Domestic........................................... $1,565 $1,205 $ 779
Foreign............................................ 376 410 494
------ ------ ------
$1,941 $1,615 $1,273
====== ====== ======
The foreign component of profit before taxes comprises the profit of all
consolidated subsidiaries located outside the United States. This profit
information differs from that reported in note 23C, which shows operating
profit for foreign geographic segments based only on the company's
manufacturing and financing operations located outside the United States.
Taxation of a multinational company involves many complex variables, such as
differing tax structures from country to country and the effect of U.S.
taxation of foreign profits. These complexities do not permit meaningful
comparisons of the U.S. and foreign components of profit before taxes and the
provision for income taxes. Additionally, current relationships between the
U.S. and foreign components are not reliable indicators of such relationships
in future periods.
Net operating loss carryforwards were available in various foreign tax
jurisdictions at December 31, 1996. The amounts and expiration dates of these
carryforwards are as follows:
2000.............................................................. $ 54
2001.............................................................. 7
2002.............................................................. 14
2003.............................................................. 6
Unlimited......................................................... 239
------
Total........................................................... $ 320
======
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon taxable income within
the carryback and carryforward periods available under the tax laws. The
company's domestic operations have generated significant cumulative profit over
the last three years. Although realization of the $1,285 of U.S. deferred tax
assets in excess of deferred tax liabilities is not certain, management has
concluded that it is "more likely than not" that the company will realize the
full benefit of U.S. deferred tax assets. While, in the aggregate, the
company's foreign subsidiaries have also generated cumulative profit over the
last three years, certain foreign subsidiaries are still in net operating loss
carryforward positions. With the exception of one subsidiary, there is not
currently sufficient positive evidence as required by SFAS 109 to substantiate
recognition of net deferred tax assets in the financial statements for those
foreign subsidiaries in net operating loss carryforward positions. Accordingly,
a valuation allowance of $149 has been recorded. It is reasonably possible that
sufficient positive evidence could be generated in the near term at one or more
of these foreign subsidiaries to support a reduction in the valuation allowance
and the resulting recognition of additional net deferred tax assets.
8. FINANCE RECEIVABLES
Finance receivables are receivables of Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation, which generally may be repaid or refinanced without penalty prior
to contractual maturity. Contractual maturities of outstanding receivables
(rental fleet financings of $297 are included in 1997 maturities due to the
company's experience that most terminate in six months) at December 31, 1996,
were:
<PAGE>
Installment Financing
Amounts Due In Contracts Leases Notes Total
----------- -------- ------ ------
1997...................... $ 587 $ 860 $ 839 $2,286
1998...................... 402 640 398 1,440
1999...................... 251 436 284 971
2000...................... 125 225 176 526
2001...................... 35 97 118 250
Thereafter................ 5 125 158 288
------ ------ ------ ------
1,405 2,383 1,973 5,761
Residual value............ -- 564 -- 564
Less: Unearned income..... 160 430 15 605
------ ------ ------ ------
Total..................... $1,245 $2,517 $1,958 $5,720
====== ====== ====== ======
The average recorded investment in impaired loans and leases for 1996, 1995
and 1994 was $43, $51 and $49, respectively. The total recorded investment in
impaired loans and leases was $33, $37 and $47 at December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994, respectively. These amounts, less the fair value of the underlying
collateral of $21, $25 and $32, represented a $12, $12 and $15 potential loss
on impaired loans and leases at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively,
for which related allowances for credit losses were recorded. Recognition of
income on finance receivables is suspended when management determines that
collection of future income is not probable. Accrual is resumed if the
receivables become contractually current and collection doubts are removed;
previously suspended income is recognized at that time. Total finance
receivables reported in Statement 3 are net of an allowance for credit losses.
Activity relating to the allowance was as follows:
A-15
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
________________________________________________________________________________
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year............... $ 57 $ 50 $ 41
Provision for credit losses................ 41 43 23
Less: Receivables, net of
recoveries, written off............ (21) (33) (13)
Other - net................................ (3) (3) (1)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year..................... $ 74 $ 57 $ 50
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Fair value information for finance receivables can be found in note 16 and
in Table IV on Pages A-18 and A-20, respectively.
Cat Financial's "Net investment in financing leases" at December 31
consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total minimum lease payments receivable............... $2,383 $1,858 $1,387
Estimated residual value of leased assets:
Guaranteed.................................... 162 113 84
Unguaranteed.................................. 402 297 208
------ ------ ------
2,947 2,268 1,679
Less: Unearned income................................. 430 363 264
------ ------ ------
Net investment in financing leases.................... $2,517 $1,905 $1,415
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
9. Inventories
Inventories at December 31, by major classification, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Raw materials and work-in-process............ $ 909 $ 710 $ 697
Finished goods............................... 1,103 1,006 942
Supplies..................................... 210 205 196
------ ------ ------
$2,222 $1,921 $1,835
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
10. Land, buildings, machinery and equipment
Land, buildings, machinery and equipment at December 31, by major
classification, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Land - at original cost............... $ 122 $ 102 $ 105
Buildings............................. 2,704 2,548 2,597
Machinery and equipment............... 3,778 3,657 3,609
Patterns, dies, jigs, etc............. 481 453 441
Furniture and fixtures................ 187 179 163
Computers............................. 537 479 474
Transportation equipment.............. 64 61 44
Equipment leased to others............ 779 674 633
Construction-in-process............... 165 150 164
------- ------- -------
8,817 8,303 8,230
Accumulated depreciation.............. (5,050) (4,659) (4,454)
------- ------- -------
Land, buildings, machinery and
equipment - net............... $3,767 $ 3,644 $ 3,776
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The company had commitments for the purchase or construction of capital
assets of approximately $275 at December 31, 1996. Capital expenditure plans
are subject to continuous monitoring, and changes in such plans could reduce
the amount committed.
Maintenance and repair expense for 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $518, $499 and
$461, respectively.
Equipment leased to others
Equipment leased to others, primarily by Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation, consisted of the following components at December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Equipment leased to others - at cost.......... $779 $674 $633
Less:
Accumulated depreciation.................... 251 220 189
---- ---- ----
Equipment leased to others - net.............. $528 $454 $444
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
Scheduled minimum rental payments to be received for equipment leased to
others during each of the years 1997 through 2001, and in total thereafter, are
$151, $117, $79, $46, $19 and $5, respectively.
11. Unconsolidated affiliated companies
The company's investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies consist
principally of a 50% interest in Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd., Japan of
$400. The other 50% owner of this company is Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.,
Japan.
Combined financial information of the unconsolidated affiliated companies,
as translated to U.S. dollars (note 3), was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended
September 30,
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Results of Operations
Sales............................... $3,729 $3,789 $3,324
====== ====== ======
Profit........................ $ 75 $ 44 $ 63
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Profit for the year ended September 30, 1994, includes $19 representing
aftertax gain on the sale of surplus assets.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At September 30,
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Position
Assets:
Current assets.............................. $1,995 $1,872 $1,853
Land, buildings, machinery and
equipment - net........................... 733 780 781
Other assets................................ 395 322 298
------ ------ ------
3,123 2,974 2,932
------ ------ ------
Liabilities:
Current liabilities....................... 1,683 1,676 1,575
Long-term debt due after one year......... 133 215 332
Other liabilities......................... 145 155 150
------ ------ ------
1,961 2,046 2,057
------ ------ ------
Ownership.................................... $1,162 $ 928 $ 875
------ ------ ------
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the company's consolidated "Profit employed in the
business" included $151 representing its share of undistributed profit of the
unconsolidated affiliated companies. In 1996, 1995 and 1994, the company
received $10, $8 and $3, respectively, in dividends from unconsolidated
affiliated companies.
A-16
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Credit commitments
The company has arrangements with a number of U.S. and non-U.S. banks to
provide lines of credit. These credit lines are changed as anticipated needs
vary and are not indicative of short-term borrowing capacity. In the United
States, the company has a long-term, contractually committed credit agreement,
which requires a minimum level of net worth. Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation cannot exceed a maximum debt to equity ratio.
Unsecured, confirmed credit lines available from banks were $4,916 at
December 31, 1996 (U.S. $2,887 and non-U.S. $2,029), of which $2,271 was
unused. For the purpose of computing unused credit lines, the total borrowings
under these lines and outstanding commercial paper supported by these lines was
considered to constitute utilization.
Machinery and Engines
At December 31, 1996, Machinery and Engines had $2,984 confirmed credit lines
(U.S. $2,887 and non-U.S. $97), of which $7 was utilized as backup for bank
borrowings. Under the contractually committed credit agreements, $1,650 is
available from various banks through October 2001, and $1,237 is available
through October 1997. The latter agreement may be extended on an annual basis
subject to mutual agreement. These two credit agreements may be used at the
company's option by either the company or up to 90% by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation, with a $300 sublimit for Caterpillar Financial Australia
Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cat Financial.
Financial Products
At December 31, 1996, Financial Products had $3,772 of confirmed lines (U.S.
$1,840 and non-U.S. $1,932), of which $2,381 was utilized as backup for
outstanding commercial paper and $257 for bank borrowings.
Based on long-term credit agreements, $967, $294 and $660 of commercial
paper outstanding at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, was
classified as long-term debt due after one year.
13. Short-term borrowings
Short-term borrowings at December 31 consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery and Engines:
Notes payable to banks........ $ 36 $ 14 $ 17
Financial Products:
Notes payable to banks........ 257 712 532
Commercial paper.............. 1,414 416 181
Other......................... 40 32 10
------ ------ ------
1,711 1,160 723
------ ------ ------
$1,747 $1,174 $ 740
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Interest paid on short-term borrowings for 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $141,
$122 and $99, respectively (interest paid in 1994 was $109 excluding the
reclassification described in note 3).
At December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the carrying value of short-term
borrowings approximated fair value.
The weighted average interest rates on short-term borrowings outstanding at
December 31 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Notes payable to banks......... 3.7% 5.4% 5.8%
Notes payable to others........ 5.5% 5.4% 5.3%
Commercial paper............... 5.2% 5.9% 6.1%
</TABLE>
The balances used to calculate the weighted average interest rates for
notes payable to banks exclude borrowings in high inflation countries (including
Brazil). The weighted average interest rates for these borrowings were not
considered meaningful because rates were impacted by the effect of significant
inflation. The balances used to calculate the weighted average interest rates
for commercial paper included $967, $294 and $660 of commercial paper supported
by revolving credit agreements which were classified as long-term debt due after
one year (note 12).
14. Long-term debt
Debt due after one year at December 31 consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery and Engines:
Notes - 9 1/8% due 1996.................. $ - $ - $ 150
Notes - 9 3/8% due 2000.................. 149 149 149
Notes - 9 3/8% due 2001.................. 183 183 183
Debentures - 9% due 2006................. 202 202 202
Debentures - 6% due 2007................. 136 131 127
Debentures - 9 3/8% due 2011............. 123 123 123
Debentures - 9 3/4% due 2000-2019........ 199 199 199
Debentures - 9 3/8% due 2021............. 236 236 236
Debentures - 8% due 2023................. 199 199 199
Medium-term notes........................ 185 300 300
Capital lease obligation - 7.4%.......... 281 257 -
Other.................................... 125 70 66
------ ------ ------
2,018 2,049 1,934
Financial Products:
Commercial paper supported by revolving
credit agreement (note 12)....... 967 294 660
Medium-term notes........................ 1,505 1,553 1,616
Other.................................... 42 68 60
------ ------ ------
2,514 1,915 2,336
------ ------ ------
$4,532 $3,964 $4,270
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The aggregate amounts of maturities and sinking fund requirements of
long-term debt during each of the years 1997 through 2001, including that due
within one year and classified as current are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery and Engines...... $ 122 $ 69 $ 63 $ 172 $ 209
Financial Products......... 1,058 668 499 285 45
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
$1,180 $ 737 $ 562 $ 457 $ 254
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Interest paid on total long-term borrowings, excluding the reclassification
described in note 3, for 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $333, $353 and $307,
respectively.
Other than the notes of the Financial Products subsidiaries, all
outstanding notes and debentures itemized above are unsecured direct obligations
of the parent company. The capital lease obligation is collateralized by the
leased manufacturing equipment and a security deposit.
The 6% debentures were sold at significant original issue discounts. This
issue is carried net of the unamortized portion of its discount, which is
amortized as interest expense over the life of the issue.
A-17
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 6% debentures, with a principal at maturity of $250 and original issue
discount of $144, have an effective annual cost of 13.3%. The 6% debentures may
be redeemed at any time, at the company's option, at an amount equal to the
respective principal at maturity.
The company may, at its option, redeem annually an additional amount for
the 9 3/4% sinking fund debenture issue, without premium, equal to 200% of the
amount of the sinking fund requirement. The company may also, at its option,
redeem additional portions of the sinking fund debentures by the payment of
premiums which, starting in 1999, decrease periodically. The premium at the
first redemption date of June 1, 1999, is 4.875%.
All other notes and debentures are not redeemable prior to maturity.
The medium-term notes are offered on a continuous basis through agents and
are primarily at fixed rates. Machinery and Engines' medium-term notes may have
maturities from nine months to 30 years. At December 31, 1996, these notes had
a weighted average interest rate of 7.6% with about six months to seven years
remaining to maturity.
The notes of the Financial Products subsidiaries primarily represent
medium-term notes having a weighted average interest rate of 6.5% with
maturities up to 15 years at December 31, 1996.
The carrying value and fair value of long-term debt can be found in Table
IV on Page A-20. Please refer to note 16 for the methods and assumptions used by
the company in estimating the fair value of long-term debt.
15. Interest rate derivative contracts
To manage its exposure to interest rate changes and lower the cost of borrowed
funds, the company uses various interest rate derivative contracts, including
swaps, caps, floors and forward rate agreements.
Interest rate derivative contracts are linked to specific debt instruments.
Interest differentials currently payable or receivable under the derivative
contracts are recognized each period as adjustments to "Interest expense" in
Statement 1. Current period income is not affected by the increase or decrease
in the fair market value of derivative instruments as interest rates change.
Interest rate swap agreements are settled in cash at specified intervals based
on the difference between the fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts
calculated by reference to the contractual notional amount. Premiums paid on
purchased interest rate caps and the cash settlement at the initial effective
date of forward rate agreements are deferred and recognized ratably as
adjustments to "Interest expense" in Statement 1 over the lives of the
agreements. Interest accruals in a net payable position are recorded as accrued
interest payable. Interest accruals in a net receivable position are recorded
as other assets. Early termination of a derivative instrument does not result
in recognition of immediate gain or loss except in those cases when the debt
instrument to which a contract is specifically linked is terminated.
The notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements outstanding
(excluding swaps with future effective dates) as of December 31, 1996,
segregated by type of instrument and year of maturity are presented in Table II
on Page A-19. The weighted average receive and pay interest rates and the
primary index to which the floating interest rates are linked are also
presented.
The notional amounts are not indicative of the company's exposure to
credit risk. The floating interest rates presented are based on the interest
rates in effect at the reporting date. These rates may change substantially in
the future due to open market factors.
The company's activity for 1996, 1995 and 1994 for each type of interest
rate swap agreement (excluding swaps with future effective dates) is summarized
in Table III on Page A-19.
At December 31, 1995, Financial Products subsidiaries had swaps having
future effective dates with a total notional amount of $59; $3
fixed-to-floating, $56 floating-to-fixed.
At December 31, 1994, Financial Products subsidiaries had three written
index-amortizing interest rate cap agreements outstanding. Two of these caps
had notional amounts of $100 and one had a notional amount of Canadian $50
(U.S. dollar equivalent $36). The company entered into these agreements, in
return for a premium, in order to reduce the overall cost of borrowing. Fair
value or mark-to-market accounting treatment was applied to these instruments.
Accordingly, unrealized and realized gains and losses on these instruments were
recorded as "Other income (expense)" in Statement 1 and as "Accounts payable
and accrued expenses" in Statement 3. Increases in interest rates during 1994
resulted in a recognized but unrealized mark-to-market loss on these written
options of $18. Lower interest rates in 1995 resulted in a reduction of the
loss to $7. The company terminated these cap agreements during 1995. In the
future, the use of interest rate contracts will be limited to those that
qualify for deferred accounting treatment, thereby minimizing fluctuations to
the earnings of the company created by mark-to-market accounting treatment.
The carrying value and fair value of interest rate swaps and options can be
found in Table IV on Page A-20. Please refer to note 16 for the methods and
assumptions used by the company in estimating the fair value of interest rate
swaps and options.
16. Fair values of financial instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the company in estimating its
fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and Short-term Investments: The carrying amount reported in the
balance sheet for cash and short-term investments approximated its fair value.
Long-term Investments: The fair value of long-term investments was based on
quoted market prices.
Foreign Currency Contracts (Forwards and Options): Fair value for foreign
currency exchange contracts was based on quoted market prices of comparable
instruments.
Finance Receivables: Fair value of finance receivables was estimated by
discounting the future cash flow using the current rates at which receivables
of similar remaining maturities would be entered into. Historical bad debt
experience was also considered.
Short-term Borrowings: The carrying amount of short-term borrowings
approximated fair value.
Long-term Debt: For Machinery and Engines notes and debentures, the fair
value was estimated based on quoted market prices. For Financial Products, fair
value is estimated by discounting the future cash flow using the company's
current borrowing rates for similar types and maturities of debt, except for
floating rate notes for which the carrying amount is considered a reasonable
estimate of fair value.
A-18
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Caterpillar Inc.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE II
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Rate Swaps
Expected Maturity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
At December 31, 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002-06 Total
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery and Engines:
Fixed-to-floating swaps
Notional amount............................ $ 150 $ 50 $ 200 $ 150 $ 450 $ - $ 1,000
Weighted average:
Receive rate.............................. 6.2% 6.4% 5.6% 6.2% 6.5% - 6.2%
Pay rate.................................. 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% - 5.7%
Pay rate index:
Federal Reserve H-15 30 day commercial paper
Financial Products:
Floating-to-fixed swaps
Notional amount............................ $ 477 $ 398 $ 209 $ 176 $ 71 $ 54 $ 1,385
Weighted average:
Receive rate.............................. 5.0% 5.0% 4.7% 5.4% 5.6% 5.0% 5.0%
Pay rate.................................. 5.6% 5.7% 5.6% 6.2% 6.0% 7.4% 5.8%
Receive rate index: LIBOR, commercial paper
Fixed-to-floating swaps
Notional amount............................. $ 115 $ 20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135
Weighted average:
Receive rate............................... 7.4% 5.2% - - - - 7.1%
Pay rate................................... 5.7% 5.8% - - - - 5.7%
Pay rate index: LIBOR
Floating-to-floating swaps
Notional amount............................. $ 226 $ 50 $ 73 $ - $ - $ - $ 349
Weighted average:
Receive rate............................... 5.7% 5.6% 5.2% - - - 5.6%
Pay rate................................... 5.5% 5.7% 5.3% - - - 5.5%
Receive/Pay rate index: LIBOR
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 111
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Rate Swaps
Machinery
& Engines Financial Products
---------- -----------------------------------------------------
Fixed-to Floating- Fixed-to Floating-
Floating to-Fixed Floating to-Floating Total
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993........................ $ 500 $ 851 $ 329 $ 867 $ 2,047
Additions........................................ 200 363 89 287 739
Maturities/Amortizations......................... (100) (220) (96) (241) (557)
Terminations..................................... - (54) (18) (421) (493)
F/X translation adjustment....................... - 11 - - 11
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1994........................ $ 600 $ 951 $ 304 $ 492 $ 1,747
Additions........................................ 220 420 70 60 550
Maturities/Amortizations......................... - (282) (63) (245) (590)
Terminations..................................... (20) (3) - (100) (103)
F/X translation adjustment....................... - 15 - - 15
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1995........................ $ 800 $ 1,101 $ 311 $ 207 $ 1,619
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Additions........................................ 200 814 - 239 1,053
Maturities/Amortizations......................... - (524) (176) (97) (797)
Terminations..................................... - - - - -
F/X translation adjustment....................... - (6) - - (6)
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1996........................ $ 1,000 $ 1,385 $ 135 $ 349 $ 1,869
======= ======= ======= ======= ========
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
A-19
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Rate Swaps and Options: The fair value is estimated based upon the
amount that the company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements as of
year-end.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the company's financial instruments
are presented in Table IV below.
17. Litigation
The company is involved in litigation matters which are normal in the course
of its operations. The results of these matters cannot be predicted with
certainty; however, management believes, based on the advice of legal counsel,
the final outcome will not have a materially adverse effect on the company's
consolidated financial position.
18. Capital stock
A. Stock options
In 1996, stockholders approved a plan providing for the granting of options
to purchase common stock of the company to officers and other key employees, as
well as non-employee directors. This plan reserves 7,000,000 shares for
issuance as well as an additional 4,000,000 shares authorized but unissued
under prior company stock option plans. The 1996 plan provides for the
granting of stock options for 2,000 shares to each non-employee director at the
close of each annual meeting of stockholders. Options are exercisable upon
completion of one full year of service following the grant date (except in the
case of death or retirement) and vest at the rate of one-third per year over
the three years following the grant. The maximum term of options is ten years.
Common shares issued under stock options, including treasury shares reissued,
totaled 656,966; 713,131; and 1,144,631 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Changes in the status of common shares subject to issuance under options
are presented in Table V on Page A-21.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted average
assumptions were used in determining fair value:
6/11/96 4/10/96 6/6/95 4/12/95
------- ------- ------ -------
Dividend yield.................... 2.13% 2.09% 1.66% 1.79%
Expected volatility............... 24.18% 25.22% 25.04% 25.32%
Risk-free interest rates.......... 6.59% 6.21% 5.87% 6.77%
Expected lives.................... 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years
Options granted under the company's stock option plan carry prices equal to
the average market price on the date of grant and therefore, in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board (APB) 25, no compensation expense is incurred in
association with the options. Below is a summary of the pro forma net income
and earnings per share amounts, determined as if the company had applied the
fair value provisions of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."
The pro forma effects on net income for 1996 and 1995 are not representative of
the effects on reported net income for future years because they do not take
into consideration pro forma compensation expense related to grants made prior
to 1995. Once the company is past the initial phase-in period, the pro formas
should be more representative for future years.
1996 1995
---- ----
Net income As reported....... $1,361 $1,136
Pro forma......... $1,352 $1,133
Profit per share of common stock As reported....... $ 7.07 $ 5.72
Pro forma......... $ 7.02 $ 5.71
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE IV
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
1996 1995 1994
Asset (Liability) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
At December 31 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Note
Amount Value Amount Value Amount Value Reference #
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash and short-term investments............ $ 487 $ 487 $ 638 $ 638 $ 419 $ 419 Statement 3, Note 20
Long-term investments...................... 508 508 449 449 172 172 Note 20
Foreign currency exchange contracts........ (3) (3) -- (1) (4) (97) Note 3
Finance receivables - net
(excluding operating and finance type
leases and currency swaps/1/)............. 4,954 4,980 4,207 4,175 3,603 3,582 Note 8
Short-term borrowings...................... 1,747 1,747 1,174 1,174 740 740 Note 13
Long-term debt
(including amounts due within one year)
Machinery and Engines.................... (2,140) (2,377) (2,205) (2,550) (2,020) (2,127) Note 14
Financial Products....................... (3,572) (3,621) (3,021) (3,083) (3,143) (3,108) Note 14
Interest rate swaps and options
Machinery and Engines -
in a net receivable position............. 1 4 -- 9 -- -- Note 15
in a net payable position................ (1) (3) (2) (1) (2) (50) Note 15
Financial Products-
in a net receivable position............. 1 4 2 7 3 46 Note 15
in a net payable position................ (4) (16) (4) (17) (23) (62) Note 15
</TABLE>
/1/Excluded items that have a net carrying value at December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994, of $692, $613 and $391, respectively.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-20
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At December 31, unissued common shares were reserved for potential stock
option grants and for issuance to other employee benefit plans in the following
amounts:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
--------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1977 stock option plan...................... - 2,547,304 2,547,304
1987 stock option plan...................... - 1,288,509 2,879,292
1996 stock option plan...................... 9,131,580 - -
Employee investment and
other benefit plans....................... 11,400,178 11,400,178 11,400,178
---------- ---------- ----------
20,531,758 15,235,991 16,826,774
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
Summarized information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 1996,
is presented below in Table VI.
B. Restricted stock
The 1996 Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan permits the company to award
restricted stock to officers and other key employees, as well as non-employee
directors. During 1996, the company awarded 84,830 shares of restricted stock to
officers and other key employees as Performance Awards, and 2,200 shares of
restricted stock were granted to non-employee directors.
C. Stockholders' rights plan
The company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which
2,000,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock of $1.00 par value. None of the preferred shares or the Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock have been issued.
On December 11, 1996, the company's board of directors adopted a new
Stockholders' Rights Plan. Under the plan, each share of Caterpillar common
stock represents one preferred stock purchase right. Each right entitles the
holder to purchase 1/100th of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock for the exercise price of $300.
These rights are exercisable only in limited circumstances. If someone acquires
15% or more of Caterpillar's common stock or announces a tender offer to do so,
each right holder (other than the acquiring person) will have the right to
purchase Caterpillar common stock at a 50% discount. Similar rights would attach
if the company was acquired in a merger or other transaction. The rights expire
December 11, 2006.
19. Operating leases
The company leases certain computer and communications equipment, transportation
equipment and other property through operating leases. Lease expense on these
leases is charged to operations as incurred. Total rental expense for operating
leases was $151, $139 and $137 for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Minimum
payments for operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable terms
in excess of one year are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Years ending December 31,
1997..................................................................... $107
1998..................................................................... 73
1999..................................................................... 53
2000..................................................................... 19
2001..................................................................... 15
Thereafter............................................................... 44
----
Total lease commitments.................................................. $311
====
</TABLE>
TABLE V
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
--------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------
Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average Average
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed Options
Outstanding at beginning of year........... 6,633,824 $ 43.91 6,553,371 $ 37.09 7,351,800 $ 31.19
Granted to officers and key employees...... 1,667,050 $ 65.81 1,602,640 $ 60.31 1,581,540 $ 53.53
Granted to outside directors............... 22,000 $ 66.94 20,000 $ 55.81 22,000 $ 56.69
Exercised.................................. (1,313,970) $ 36.05 (1,503,330) $ 31.69 (2,344,369) $ 29.90
Lapsed..................................... (71,847) $ 56.45 (38,857) $ 49.70 (57,600) $ 35.26
---------- ---------- ---------
Outstanding at end of year................. 6,937,057 $ 50.61 6,633,824 $ 43.91 6,553,371 $ 37.09
=========== ========== =========
Options exercisable at year-end............ 3,772,135 $ 40.87 3,584,140 $ 34.70 3,388,433 $ 30.58
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted during the year.................. $ 16.24 $ 15.23 not applicable
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE VI
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Weighted Average
Remaining
Range of # Outstanding Contractual Life Weighted-Average # Outstanding Weighted-Average
Exercise Prices at 12/31/96 (Years) Exercise Price at 12/31/96 Exercise Price
- ----------------- -------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$23.56 to $37.53 2,403,201 4.9 $32.16 2,403,201 $32.16
$53.53 to $66.94 4,533,856 8.5 $60.39 1,368,934 $56.14
--------- ---------
6,937,057 7.3 $50.61 3,772,135 $40.87
========= =========
</TABLE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-21
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments which potentially subject the company to credit risk
consist primarily of trade and finance receivables and short-term and long-term
investments. Additionally, to a lesser extent, the company is potentially
subject to credit risk associated with counterparties to derivative contracts.
Trade receivables are primarily short-term receivables from independently
owned and operated dealers which arise in the normal course of business. The
company performs regular credit evaluations of its dealers. The company
generally doesn't require collateral, and the majority of its trade receivables
are unsecured. The company does make use of various devices such as security
agreements and letters of credit to protect its interests as it deems
necessary. No single dealer or region represents a significant concentration of
credit risk. At December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the carrying value of trade
receivables approximated fair value.
Finance receivables primarily represent receivables under installment sales
contracts, receivables arising from leasing transactions and notes receivable.
The company generally maintains a secured interest in the equipment financed.
Receivables from customers in construction-related industries made up
approximately one-third of total finance receivables at December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively. No single customer or region represents a significant
concentration of credit risk. Fair value information for finance receivables
can be found in note 16 and in Table IV on Pages A-18 and A-20, respectively.
The company has short-term and long-term investments with high quality
institutions and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one
institution. At December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the carrying value of
short-term investments approximated fair value. Long-term investments are held
by Caterpillar Insurance Co. Ltd. and are a component of "Other assets" in
Statement 3. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the company had a long-term
investment which collateralizes a capital lease obligation (note 14). At
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the carrying value of long-term investments
was $508, $449 and $172, respectively, which, based on quoted market prices,
approximated fair value.
At December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation was contingently liable under guarantees of securities of certain
Caterpillar dealers totaling $253, $282 and $258, respectively, of which $159,
$222 and $165 was outstanding, respectively. These guarantees have terms
ranging up to two years and are fully secured by dealer assets. No loss has
been experienced nor is any anticipated under these agreements.
At December 31, 1996, the company had outstanding derivative contracts with
notional amounts totaling $3,957 with terms generally ranging up to five years.
The company deals only with financial institutions, which in the opinion of
management, will not expose the company to undue credit loss exposure. The
company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of the counterparties.
Collateral is not required of the coun terparties or of the company. The
company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
counterparties is limited to only the recognized but not realized gains
incurred on the derivative contracts. At December 31, 1996, the company's
exposure to credit loss was $14.
21. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
At this time, based on current regulations, the potential impact of
environmental regulation compliance on the company's capital expenditures,
earnings and competitive position is not expected to be material.
The company is involved in a number of remediation actions to clean up
hazardous wastes as required by federal and state laws. These laws often
require responsible parties to fund remediation actions regardless of fault,
legality of original disposal or ownership of a disposal site. Under accounting
guidelines, the company is required to accrue and charge to income management's
best estimate of future costs associated with these sites. When there appears
to be a range of possible costs with equal likelihood, liabilities are based on
the lower end of that range. For 1996, the amount accrued for potential
clean-up costs is contained in the line item, "Accounts payable and accrued
expenses" in Statement 3, and represents an immaterial portion of that line
item. While the company may have rights of contribution or reimbursement under
insurance policies, amounts that may be recoverable from other entities are not
considered in establishing the accrual.
In deciding upon amounts to be reserved for potential environmental
liability at a particular site, the company looks at several factors including:
. prior experience regarding environmental remediation at a
similar site;
. experience of other companies at a similar site;
. technology available for remediation at the time;
. the stage of remediation for the particular site (i.e., whether
the site is at the identification stage or whether a remedial
investigation or feasibility study has been conducted);
. documentation, if any, linking the company to a particular site;
. the amount the company has been asked to contribute to a particular
site; and
. aspects of the law under which the company is alleged to be
liable for clean up.
The company also looks at these factors in deciding whether it could incur
liabilities beyond those which it has accrued for future remediation. It is
difficult to estimate potential liability at sites in very early stages of
remediation (of which the company has seven currently). At this time, however,
the company believes the likelihood of incurring any material environmental
liability beyond that accrued is remote.
22. PLANT CLOSING AND CONSOLIDATION COSTS
At December 31, 1996, the reserve for plant closing and consolidation costs
was $259. Of this balance, $166 is related to costs associated with the closure
of the Component Products Division's Precision Barstock Products (PBP)
operation located in York, Pennsylvania. Significant costs related to the York
PBP portion of the reserve are employee severance benefits (pension, medical
and supplemental unemployment benefits), rearrangement and start-up costs
related to the relocation of production, and write-down of buildings, machinery
and equipment.
The probable closing of the York PBP manufacturing operation was announced
in December 1991. In March 1996, it was announced that the facility would be
closed. The company is currently in the process of closing the unit.
A-22
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also included in the reserve for plant closing and consolidation costs at
December 31, 1996, was $69 for write-downs of buildings, machinery and equipment
at previously closed facilities. The write-downs establish a new cost basis for
assets that have been permanently impaired. The remainder of the reserve at
December 31, 1996, is related to severance benefits provided to former employees
at previously closed facilities. The reserve for such benefits is reduced as the
benefits are provided. Currently, benefits are expected to be provided through
2003.
23. Segment information
A. Nature of operations
The company operates in three principal business segments:
(1) Machinery--Design, manufacture and marketing of construction, mining and
agricultural machinery -- track and wheel tractors, track and wheel
loaders, pipelayers, motor graders, wheel tractor-scrapers, track and
wheel excavators, backhoe loaders, mining shovels, log skidders, log
loaders, off-highway trucks, articulated trucks, paving products and
related parts.
(2) Engines--Design, manufacture and marketing of engines for earthmoving and
construction machines, on-highway trucks and locomotives; marine,
petroleum, agricultural, industrial and other applications; electric power
generation systems; and related parts. Caterpillar reciprocating diesel
and spark-ignited engines meet power needs ranging from 40 to 13,600
horsepower. Turbines range from 1,340 to 15,000 horsepower (1000 to 11 200
kilowatts).
(3) Financial Products -- Provides financing alternatives for Caterpillar and
noncompetitive related equipment, and extends loans to Caterpillar
customers and dealers. Also provides various forms of insurance to
Caterpillar dealers and customers to help support their purchase and
financing of Caterpillar equipment.
The company conducts operations in the Machinery and Engines segments of its
business under highly competitive conditions, including intense price
competition. It places great emphasis upon the high quality and performance of
its products and the service support for such products which is supplied by its
dealers. Although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types
of machines and engines produced by the company, there are numerous companies,
large and small, which compete with the company in the sale of each of its
products.
The company's products are sold primarily under the marks "Caterpillar,"
"Cat," "Solar," "Barber-Greene" and "MaK" (acquired 12/31/96). Machines are
distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers, 65 located
in the United States and 127 located outside the United States. Worldwide, these
dealers have more than 1,300 places of business. Diesel and spark-ignited
engines are sold principally through the worldwide dealer organization and to
other manufacturers for use in products manufactured by them. Caterpillar
dealers do not deal exclusively in the company's products, although in most
cases sales and servicing of the company's products are the dealers' principal
business. Turbines are sold through a sales force employed by Solar Turbines
Incorporated, a wholly owned subsidiary, or its subsidiaries and associated
companies. These employees are from time to time assisted by independent sales
representatives.
Financial Products consists primarily of Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation and its subsidiaries and Caterpillar Insurance Services Corporation.
The principal markets for the Machinery and Engines segments are located in
the United States, Europe, Asia/Pacific and Latin America. The United States is
the principal market for the Financial Products segment.
The majority of the company's sales and revenues is derived from the Machinery
segment.
B. Business segments
The high degree of integration of the company's manufacturing operations
necessitates the use of a substantial number of allocations in the determination
of business segment information. Intersegment sales and revenues, which
primarily represent intersegment engine sales, are valued at prices comparable
to those for unrelated parties.
Information on the company's business segments was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
For the years ended December 31:
Sales:
Machinery.................................. $11,862 $11,336 $10,164
Engines.................................... 4,879 4,920 4,381
Elimination of intersegment engine sales.... (927) (805) (682)
------- ------- -------
Consolidated sales.......................... 15,814 15,451 13,863
Financial Products revenues................. 708 621 465
------- ------- -------
Sales and revenues.......................... $16,522 $16,072 $14,328
======= ======= =======
Operating profit:
Machinery.................................. $ 1,562 $ 1,210 $ 1,099
Engines.................................... 395 462 348
Financial Products......................... 114 88 64
------- ------- -------
2,071 1,760 1,511
General corporate expenses.................. (100) (79) (77)
------- ------- -------
Operating profit............................ $ 1,971 $ 1,681 $ 1,434
======= ======= =======
Capital expenditures -- including
equipment leased to others:
Machinery................................. $ 314 $ 256 $ 272
Engines................................... 152 179 182
Financial Products........................ 263 210 187
General corporate......................... 42 34 53
------- ------- -------
$ 771 $ 679 $ 694
======= ======= =======
Depreciation and amortization:
Machinery.................................. $ 372 $ 375 $ 394
Engines.................................... 171 172 168
Financial Products......................... 121 102 95
General corporate.......................... 32 33 26
------- ------- -------
$ 696 $ 682 $ 683
======= ======= =======
At December 31:
Identifiable assets:
Machinery.................................. $ 6,010 $ 5,122 $ 5,773
Engines.................................... 3,023 2,746 2,570
Financial Products......................... 6,572 5,592 4,668
------- ------- -------
15,605 13,460 13,011
General corporate assets.................... 2,422 2,894 2,784
Investments in unconsolidated
affiliated companies....................... 701 476 455
------- ------- -------
Total assets................................ $18,728 $16,830 $16,250
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
A-23
<PAGE>
NOTES continued
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic segments
Manufacturing activities of the Machinery and Engines segments are carried on
in 31 plants in the United States; four in the United Kingdom; two each in
China, France, Germany, Italy and Mexico; and one each in Australia, Belgium,
Brazil, Hungary, Indonesia, Poland and Russia. Three major distribution centers
are located in the United States and ten are located outside the United States.
While the majority of the activity of the Financial Products segment is carried
on in the United States, it also conducts operations in Australia, Canada,
Europe and Mexico.
Caterpillar is a highly integrated company. The product of subsidiary
companies' manufacturing operations located outside the United States, in most
instances, consists of components manufactured or purchased locally which are
assembled with components purchased from related companies. As a result, the
profits of these operations do not bear any definite relationship to their
assets, and individual subsidiaries' results cannot be viewed in isolation.
Prices between Caterpillar companies are established at levels deemed equivalent
to those which would prevail between unrelated parties.
Information on the company's geographic segments, based on the location of the
company's manufacturing operations for Machinery and Engines, was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
For the years ended December 31:
Sales:
United States.................................. $13,042 $12,191 $10,994
Europe......................................... 2,214 2,638 2,358
All other...................................... 1,138 1,200 1,050
Elimination of intersegment sales from:
United States.................................. (265) (308) (266)
Europe......................................... (135) (125) (141)
All other...................................... (180) (145) (132)
------- ------- -------
Consolidated sales.............................. 15,814 15,451 13,863
Revenues:
United States................................ 534 482 362
All other.................................... 174 139 103
------- ------- -------
Sales and revenues.............................. $16,522 $16,072 $14,328
======= ======= =======
Operating profit:
Machinery and Engines:
United States................................ $ 1,708 $ 1,356 $ 1,108
Europe....................................... 166 206 244
All other.................................... 83 110 95
------- ------- -------
1,957 1,672 1,447
------- ------- -------
Financial Products:
United States................................ 98 81 61
All other.................................... 16 7 3
------- ------- -------
Total Financial Products........................ 114 88 64
------- ------- -------
2,071 1,760 1,511
General corporate expenses....................... (100) (79) (77)
------- ------- -------
Operating profit................................. $ 1,971 $ 1,681 $ 1,434
======= ======= =======
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- -------
At December 31:
Identifiable assets:
Machinery and Engines:
United States................................. $ 6,495 $ 5,836 $ 6,445
Europe........................................ 1702 1,229 1,160
All other..................................... 836 803 738
------- ------- -------
9,033 7,868 8,343
------- ------- -------
Financial Products:
United States................................. 4,687 4,042 3,557
All other..................................... 1,885 1,550 1,111
------- ------- -------
6,572 5,592 4,668
------- ------- -------
15,605 13,460 13,011
General corporate assets........................ 2,422 2,894 2,784
Investments in unconsolidated
affiliated companies........................... 701 476 455
------- ------- -------
Total assets.................................... $18,728 $16,830 $16,250
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
D. Non-U.S. sales
Sales outside the United States were 51% of consolidated sales for 1996, 52%
for 1995 and 49% for 1994. Information on the company's sales outside the
United States, based on dealer location, was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
For the years ended December 31:
Sales of U.S. manufactured product:
Asia/Pacific................................... $1,743 $1,505 $1,338
Europe......................................... 1,065 1,005 821
Latin America.................................. 913 829 763
Africa/Middle East............................. 767 644 522
Canada......................................... 748 852 806
------ ------ ------
5,236 4,835 4,250
------ ------ ------
Sales of non-U.S. manufactured product:
Asia/Pacific................................... 817 785 626
Europe......................................... 1,301 1,681 1,257
Latin America.................................. 325 354 388
Africa/Middle East............................. 384 270 231
Canada......................................... 75 104 103
------ ------ ------
2,902 3,194 2,605
------ ------ ------
Total sales outside the United States:
Asia/Pacific................................... 2,560 2,290 1,964
Europe......................................... 2,366 2,686 2,078
Latin America.................................. 1,238 1,183 1,151
Africa/Middle East............................. 1,151 914 753
Canada......................................... 823 956 909
====== ====== ======
$8,138 $8,029 $6,855
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
A-24
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24. Selected quarterly financial results (unaudited)
Financial information for interim periods was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 Quarter
-------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
------- ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and revenues.................... $3,844 $4,180 $4,033 $4,465
Less: Revenues........................ 162 172 184 190
------ ------ ------ ------
Sales................................. 3,682 4,008 3,849 4,275
Cost of goods sold.................... 2,780 2,976 2,905 3,171
------ ------ ------ ------
Gross margin.......................... 902 1,032 944 1,104
Profit................................ 296 374 310 381
Profit per share of common stock...... $ 1.53 $ 1.94 $ 1.61 $ 1.99
1995 Quarter
------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
------ ------ ------ ------
Sales and revenues.................... $3,913 $4,213 $3,733 $4,213
Less: Revenues........................ 140 154 165 162
------ ------ ------ ------
Sales................................. 3,773 4,059 3,568 4,051
Cost of goods sold.................... 2,890 3,110 2,878 3,122
------ ------ ------ ------
Gross margin.......................... 883 949 690 929
Profit................................ 300 323 213 300
Profit per share of common stock...... $ 1.50 $ 1.62 $ 1.07 $ 1.53
</TABLE>
A-25
<PAGE>
Eleven-year Financial Summary
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994 1993
--------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the Years Ended December 31:
Sales and revenues................... $16,522 16,072 14,328 11,615
Sales.............................. $15,814 15,451 13,863 11,235
Percent inside the United States.. 49% 48% 51% 51%
Percent outside the United States. 51% 52% 49% 49%
Revenues........................... $ 708 621 465 380
Profit (loss) before effects of
accounting changes/(1)/............. $ 1,361 1,136 955 652
Effects of accounting changes/(2)/... $ -- -- -- --
Profit (loss)/(1)/................... $ 1,361 1,136 955 652
Profit (loss) per share of common
stock:/(1)(3)/
Profit (loss) before effects of
accounting changes/(1)/........... $ 7.07 5.72 4.70 3.21
Effects of accounting changes/(2)/. $ -- -- -- --
Profit (loss)...................... $ 7.07 5.72 4.70 3.21
Dividends declared per share of
common stock........................ $ 1.55 1.30 .63 .30
Return on average common stock
equity.............................. 36.3% 36.1% 37.4% 34.6%
Capital expenditures:
Land, buildings, machinery and
equipment......................... $ 506 464 501 417
Equipment leased to others......... $ 265 215 193 215
Depreciation and amortization........ $ 696 682 683 668
Research and engineering expenses.... $ 570 532 435 455
As a percent of sales and revenues. 3.4% 3.3% 3.0% 3.9%
Provision (credit) for income
taxes/(4)/.......................... $ 613 501 354 42
Wages, salaries and employee
benefits............................ $ 3,437 2,919 3,146 3,038
Average number of employees.......... 54,968 54,263 52,778 50,443
At December 31:
Total receivables:
Trade and other.................... $ 3,084 2,657 3,096 2,769
Finance............................ $ 5,646 4,820 3,988 3,140
Inventories.......................... $ 2,222 1,921 1,835 1,525
Total assets:
Machinery and Engines.............. $12,156 11,238 11,582 11,131
Financial Products................. $ 6,572 5,592 4,668 3,676
Long-term debt due after one year:
Machinery and Engines.............. $ 2,018 2,049 1,934 2,030
Financial Products................. $ 2,514 1,915 2,336 1,865
Total debt:
Machinery and Engines.............. $ 2,176 2,219 2,037 2,387
Financial Products................. $ 5,283 4,181 3,866 3,041
Ratios -- excluding Financial
Products:
Ratio of current assets to current
liabilities.......................1.68 to 1 1.78 to 1 1.62 to 1 1.53 to 1
Percent of total debt to total
debt and stockholders' equity..... 34.6% 39.6% 41.2% 52.1%
</TABLE>
/(1)/ 1993 profit was after extraordinary loss on early retirement of debt;
profit before extraordinary loss was $681, $3.36 per share of common
stock. 1987 profit was after extraordinary tax benefit; profit before
extraordinary tax benefit was $319, $1.60 per share of common stock.
/(2)/ Effective January 1, 1992, the company adopted SFAS 106, SFAS 109 and SFAS
112.
/(3)/ Computed on weighted average number of shares outstanding.
/(4)/ The company adopted SFAS 109 in 1992. Prior to 1992, the tax provision was
determined in accordance with APB 11. The 1987 provision for income taxes,
including the reduction for the $31 extraordinary tax benefit, was $87.
A-26
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986
- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
10,194 10,182 11,436 11,126 10,435 8,294 7,380
9,840 9,838 11,103 10,882 10,255 8,180 7,321
45% 41% 45% 47% 50% 52% 54%
55% 59% 55% 53% 50% 48% 46%
354 344 333 244 180 114 59
(218) (404) 210 497 616 350 76
(2,217) -- -- -- -- -- --
(2,435) (404) 210 497 616 350 76
(1.08) (2.00) 1.04 2.45 3.04 1.76 .39
(10.98) -- -- -- -- -- --
(12.06) (2.00) 1.04 2.45 3.04 1.76 .39
.30 .53 .60 .60 .43 .28 .31
(86.7%) (9.4%) 4.7% 11.6% 16.0% 10.4% 2.4%
515 653 926 984 732 463 290
125 121 113 105 61 30 41
654 602 533 471 434 425 453
446 441 420 387 334 298 308
4.4% 4.3% 3.7% 3.5% 3.2% 3.6% 4.2%
(114) (152) 78 162 262 118 21
2,795 3,051 3,032 2,888 2,643 2,284 2,184
52,340 55,950 59,662 60,784 57,954 53,770 54,024
2,330 2,133 2,361 2,353 2,349 2,044 1,755
2,525 2,145 1,891 1,498 1,222 795 466
1,675 1,921 2,105 2,120 1,986 1,323 1,211
10,979 9,346 9,626 9,100 8,226 6,647 6,134
2,956 2,696 2,325 1,826 1,460 984 627
2,753 2,676 2,101 1,797 1,428 900 963
1,366 1,216 789 491 525 387 171
3,271 3,136 2,873 2,561 2,116 1,484 1,582
2,401 2,111 1,848 1,433 1,144 712 370
1.57 to 1 1.74 to 1 1.67 to 1 1.78 to 1 1.76 to 1 1.55 to 1 1.50 to 1
67.5% 43.7% 38.8% 36.4% 34.0% 29.4% 33.4%
</TABLE>
A-27
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The discussions of Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources are
grouped as follows:
Consolidated--represents the consolidated data of Caterpillar Inc. and all its
subsidiaries (affiliated companies that are more than 50% owned).
Machinery and Engines--company operations excluding the Financial Products
subsidiaries. This category consists primarily of the company's manufacturing,
marketing and parts distribution operations, which are highly integrated. Unless
attributed to a particular subsidiary, items discussed in Management's
Discussion and Analysis reflect the consolidated effect of contributions by
worldwide operations.
Financial Products--the company's Financial Products subsidiaries, primarily
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (Cat Financial) and Caterpillar
Insurance Services Corporation. Cat Financial and its subsidiaries in the
Americas, Australia and Europe derive earnings from financing sales and leases
of Caterpillar products and noncompetitive related equipment and from loans
extended to Caterpillar customers and dealers. Caterpillar Insurance Services
Corporation provides insurance services to Caterpillar dealers and customers to
help support their purchase and financing of Caterpillar equipment.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
- ---------------------
1996 COMPARED WITH 1995
Profit for 1996 was $1.36 billion or $7.07 per share of common stock, an
improvement of $225 million over profit of $1.14 billion or $5.72 per share for
1995. Sales and revenues of $16.52 billion were $450 million higher than last
year.
Machinery and Engines
Sales were $15.81 billion, an increase of $363 million from 1995. Profit before
tax was $1.79 billion, an improvement of $296 million. The primary reasons for
the increase in profit were a 2% improvement in price realization and the effect
of the stronger dollar as costs incurred in Japanese yen and European currencies
translated into fewer U.S. dollars.
Price realization improved primarily because of price increases taken over the
past year and the absence of certain European currency hedges in place a year
ago. (The adverse impact of currency hedges (forward contracts) that matured
during 1995 was about $135 million. All such forward contracts had matured as of
the end of 1995.) A favorable change in geographic sales mix also contributed to
the improved price realization. These favorable factors were partially offset by
higher sales discounts and the negative effect of the stronger dollar on sales
in European and Asian currencies.
Physical sales volume was about the same as in 1995.
Margin (sales less cost of goods sold) increased $531 million or 15%. Margin
as a percent of sales was 25.2%, up from 22.3%, primarily because of the better
price realization and the effect of the stronger dollar as costs incurred in
Japanese yen and European currencies translated into fewer U.S. dollars. In
addition, margins have improved as a result of lower material costs (a result of
our joint efforts with suppliers) and continued improvements in manufacturing
efficiencies.
These favorable items were partially offset by higher incentive pay expense.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1.72 billion, compared with
$1.48 billion in 1995. The $232 million increase reflects higher spending levels
in support of expanded operations and major initiatives to enhance long-term
growth, the effect of inflation on costs and higher incentive pay expense.
Research and development (R&D) expenses were up $35 million from 1995. The
increase primarily reflects continuing high levels of activity for new product
introductions and higher incentive pay expense.
Operating profit of $1.86 billion was $264 million higher than 1995. Operating
profit as a percent of sales was 11.7% compared with 10.3% a year ago.
Interest expense of $194 million was about the same as a year ago.
Other income/expense was income of $127 million compared with income of $92
million last year. The increase of $35 million is primarily due to a favorable
change in foreign exchange gains and losses, higher interest income and several
small favorable items recorded in 1996. Partially offsetting these favorable
items was the absence of a $10 million reimbursement recorded in 1995 under the
company's insurance coverage for the settlement of two class action complaints.
Financial Products
Before-tax profit for Financial Products was a record $151 million, up $30
million from 1995. The increase resulted primarily from a larger portfolio of
earning assets at Cat Financial and gains recognized on the sale of securities
at Caterpillar Insurance Company Limited (Cat Insurance). Partially offsetting
these favorable items was the absence of an $11 million pre-tax gain recorded in
1995 for interest rate caps written by Cat Financial. (The caps were terminated
during second-quarter 1995.)
Revenues of $708 million were a record and were up $87 million, primarily the
result of Cat Financial's larger portfolio. Selling, general and administrative
expenses were up $38 million, primarily due to Cat Financial's higher
depreciation on leased equipment and other increases due to a larger portfolio.
Interest expense was up $23 million due to increased borrowings to support the
larger portfolio, partially offset by lower borrowing rates. Other
income/expense was income of $37 million, an increase of $4 million from a year
ago.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $613 million, $112 million higher than a year ago. The
increase primarily reflects higher before-tax profit. The effective tax rate was
31.6% compared with 31.0% for 1995.
Unconsolidated Affiliated Companies
The company's share of unconsolidated affiliated companies' results was $33
million, up $11 million from a year ago. Profits from new unconsolidated
affiliates F.G. Wilson, L.L.C. and Caterpillar Elphinstone Pty. Ltd. along with
higher profits at Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. were the primary reasons for
the increase from 1995.
A-28
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOURTH-QUARTER 1996
COMPARED WITH FOURTH-QUARTER 1995
Fourth-quarter profit of $381 million or $1.99 per share was $81 million higher
than fourth-quarter 1995 profit of $300 million or $1.53 per share. A 4%
increase in physical sales volume and a 2% increase in price realization were
the most significant factors contributing to the increased profits.
Machinery and Engines
Profit before tax of $485 million was up 19% or $77 million from last year's
fourth-quarter. Sales of Machinery and Engines of $4.28 billion were up 6%. The
higher sales resulted from a 4% increase in physical sales volume along with a
2% improvement in price realization.
The increase in physical sales volume primarily resulted from higher machine
sales inside the United States that were partially offset by lower machine sales
outside the United States and lower engine sales inside the United States.
Price realization improved primarily because of price increases taken over the
past year and the absence of certain European currency hedges in place a year
ago. (The adverse impact of currency hedges (forward contracts) that matured
during fourth-quarter 1995 was about $30 million. All such forward contracts had
matured as of the end of 1995.) These favorable factors were partially offset by
higher sales discounts and the negative effect of the stronger dollar on sales
in European currencies.
Margin (sales less cost of goods sold) of $1.10 billion increased $175 million
from the fourth-quarter a year ago. Margin as a percent of sales was 25.8%, up
from 22.9%, primarily because of better price realization. Also contributing to
the higher margins were the higher volume, the favorable impact of a smaller
reduction of inventory during the quarter as compared to a year ago and the
effect of the stronger dollar as costs incurred in Japanese yen and European
currencies translated into fewer U.S. dollars.
Partially offsetting the impact on margin from these favorable items were
higher incentive pay expense and an unfavorable product sales mix.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $497 million, compared with
$392 million during the fourth-quarter 1995. The $105 million increase reflects
increased spending levels in support of expanded operations and major growth
initiatives, volume-related parts distribution expenses, the effect of inflation
on costs and higher incentive pay expense.
Research and development expenses of $111 million were up $9 million from the
fourth-quarter a year ago. The increase primarily reflects continuing high
levels of activity for new product introductions and higher incentive pay
expense.
Operating profit was $496 million, up $61 million from the fourth-quarter a
year ago. Operating profit, as a percent of sales, was 11.6% compared with 10.7%
a year ago.
Interest expense was about the same as fourth-quarter a year ago.
Other income/expense was income of $37 million compared with income of $20
million last year. The change reflects a favorable change in foreign exchange
gains and losses and several small favorable items recorded during the quarter.
Financial Products
Before-tax profit for Financial Products was $35 million, a record for any
fourth-quarter and an improvement of $15 million from last year's fourth-
quarter. The higher profit was primarily the result of a larger portfolio of
earning assets at Cat Financial.
Fourth-quarter record revenues of $190 million were up $28 million compared
with fourth-quarter 1995, primarily the result of Cat Financial's larger
portfolio.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $84 million, an increase of
$14 million compared with fourth-quarter a year ago, primarily due to Cat
Financial's higher depreciation on leased equipment and other increases due to a
larger portfolio. Interest expense was $9 million higher due to increased
borrowings to support the larger Cat Financial portfolio, partially offset by
lower borrowing rates. Other income/expense was income of $13 million, an
increase of $10 million primarily due to higher investment income from Cat
Insurance's investment portfolio.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $151 million, compared with $133 million
for the fourth-quarter last year. The increase primarily was due to the higher
before-tax profit partially offset by a lower effective tax rate. The effective
tax rate was 29% compared with 31% for the fourth-quarter of 1995.
Unconsolidated Affiliated Companies
The company's share of unconsolidated affiliated companies' results was $12
million, up $7 million from a year ago. Higher profits from Shin Caterpillar
Mitsubishi Ltd. were the primary reason for the increase.
FOURTH-QUARTER 1996
COMPARED WITH THIRD-QUARTER 1996
Fourth-quarter profit of $381 million or $1.99 per share was $71 million higher
than third-quarter profit of $310 million or $1.61 per share. A 12% increase in
sales volume was the most significant factor contributing to the increased
profit.
Machinery and Engines
Profit before tax for Machinery and Engines was $485 million, an $84 million
increase from the previous quarter. Sales of $4.28 billion increased $426
million because of the 12% higher physical sales volume. The increase in
physical sales volume was primarily the result of higher machine and engine
sales both inside and outside the United States. Price realization was lower due
to higher sales discounts.
Margin was $160 million higher than the third quarter. As a percent of sales,
the margin rate was 25.8% compared with 24.5% last quarter. The higher margin
rate is attributed to the favorable impact of higher sales and a more favorable
mix of product sold. Partially offsetting these favorable items were higher
sales discounts and the unfavorable impact of a reduction of inventory during
the quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $497 million, up $74 million
from third quarter. The increase was somewhat typical, as the fourth-quarter is
generally a higher cost quarter for these types of expenses. However, the
increase is primarily reflective of increased activity in support of expanded
A-29
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
operations and major growth initiatives. Volume-related parts distribution
expenses were also higher.
Research and development expenses of $111 million were up $7 million from the
third quarter. The increase primarily reflects continuing high levels of
activity for new product introductions and higher incentive pay expense.
Operating profit of $496 million increased $79 million. As a percent of sales,
operating profit was 11.6%, up from 10.8% in the third quarter.
Interest expense of $48 million was essentially the same as the third quarter.
Other income/expense was income of $37 million, an increase of $5 million
resulting from several small favorable items recorded during the quarter.
Financial Products
Financial Products' before-tax profit was $35 million, a decrease of $4 million
from third quarter. Revenues were up $6 million, primarily the result of Cat
Financial's larger portfolio. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
up $15 million mostly due to a higher provision for credit losses at Cat
Financial and other increases due to a larger portfolio. Other income/expense
was income of $13 million, up $6 million from the third quarter primarily due to
higher investment income from Cat Insurance's investment portfolio.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense of $151 million increased $13 million from the previous
quarter. The increase primarily reflects the higher profit before tax partially
offset by a reduction in the effective tax rate to 29%.
Unconsolidated Affiliated Companies
The company's share of unconsolidated affiliated companies' results was $12
million, up $4 million from the previous quarter. Higher profits from Shin
Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd. were the primary reason for the increase.
1996 SALES
Caterpillar worldwide sales were a record $15.81 billion in 1996, a $363 million
or 2% increase over 1995. The primary reason for the increase was improved price
realization. Sales increases were highest in the Asia/Pacific region and the
United States. Gains also were registered in Africa/Middle East and Latin
America while sales declined in Europe/Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)
and Canada.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sales by Business Segment
1996 1995 1994
----------------------
(Billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery..... $11.86 $11.33 $10.16
Engines....... 3.95 4.12 3.70
------ ------ ------
$15.81 $15.45 $13.86
====== ====== ======
- -------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Worldwide sales for the Machinery segment increased 5% from 1995, setting
another all-time record. Most of the improvement was due to higher price
realization although sales volume also increased due to higher dealer sales to
end-users.
Engine segment sales declined 4% from 1995 levels after four consecutive years
of record sales. The decline was due primarily to a drop in demand for on-
highway truck engines that more than offset an increase in sales to power
generation applications. Turbine sales also increased in power generation
applications as well as oil and gas applications.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Caterpillar Sales Inside the United States
1996 1995 1994
--------------------
(Billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery........... $ 5.89 $ 5.49 $ 5.16
Engines............. 1.78 1.93 1.85
------ ------ ------
$ 7.67 $ 7.42 $ 7.01
====== ====== ======
- -------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Caterpillar sales inside the United States were $7.67 billion, a $254 million or
3% increase over 1995, as higher sales in the machinery segment more than offset
a decline in the engine segment. Company machinery sales rose as dealers
increased their new machine inventories in response to the improved economic
outlook. This favorable inventory action combined with improved price
realization more than offset the impact of slightly lower dealer machine sales
to end-users. For the engine segment, higher turbine sales failed to offset the
decline in diesel and gas engines. Engine price realization was somewhat lower
than 1995.
Sales inside the United States represented 49% of the worldwide total versus
48% in 1995.
Dealer Machine Sales to End-Users Inside the United States
The United States economy registered moderate growth in 1996 with Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) increasing about 2.5%. This moderate growth combined with higher
construction and mining activity was sufficient to keep industry demand for
machines near last year's outstanding level. Machine sales to end-users,
however, declined slightly due to a lower share of industry sales primarily in
sand and quarry applications as well as in commercial, industrial and government
building construction. Deliveries increased to dealers' dedicated rental fleets,
which continue to constitute about one-quarter of all dollar deliveries.
Sales of machines to end-users in the construction sector declined slightly:
. Highway sales were lower as construction spending remained at 1995
levels.
. Sales to the commercial, industrial and government building sector
also were lower despite growth in private and public nonresidential
building construction.
. Housing-related sales were flat although housing starts were up 9%.
Sales to end-users also declined in the commodity sector:
. Coal mining sales were down although mine production was up. Coal
prices were generally lower.
. Sales to the sand and quarry sector of mining also were lower despite
higher mine production.
. Metal mining-related sales declined reflecting lower metals prices as
well as lower mine production.
A-30
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Sales to the agricultural sector rose reflecting the addition of new
models and a healthy farm economy.
. Forestry-related sales were lower. Lumber production was flat and
prices were down. Both pulp production and prices were down with
prices down significantly.
Sales to end-users in industrial and landfill sectors were both higher.
Engine Sales to End-Users Inside the United States
Engine sales to end-users declined as lower diesel and gas engine sales more
than offset an increase in turbine sales:
. Sales of engines to truck and bus Original Equipment Manufacturers
(OEMs) fell as demand for heavy duty trucks declined significantly.
. Diesel and gas engine sales remained near 1995 levels for other
applications as higher demand in marine and petroleum applications
offset lower demand in power generation and industrial applications.
. Higher turbine sales in oil and gas applications more than offset a
decline of turbine sales in power generation applications.
Caterpillar Sales Outside the United States
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---------------------
(Billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery.................................. $5.97 $5.84 $5.00
Engines.................................... 2.17 2.19 1.85
----- ----- -----
$8.14 $8.03 $6.85
===== ===== =====
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Caterpillar sales outside the United States were $8.14 billion, a 1%
increase from 1995. These sales represented 51% of worldwide sales, down from
52% in 1995. Sales were mixed by region with gains in Asia/Pacific,
Africa/Middle East and Latin America offsetting declines in Europe/CIS and
Canada.
Machinery segment sales surpassed 1995 levels as improved price realization
more than offset a drop in sales volume. Dealer sales to end-users, however,
increased.
Engine segment sales were virtually unchanged as price realization and sales
volume remained near 1995 levels. Diesel and gas engine sales declined although
gains were registered in the Asian and Latin American areas. Dealer sales to
end-users, however, increased with gains in power generation, industrial and
petroleum applications more than offsetting a decline in sales to marine and
on-highway truck OEM applications. Turbine sales increased in oil and gas
applications as well as industrial power generation with the largest gains in
Africa/Middle East and Asia/Pacific.
Asia/Pacific
Sales rose 12% with gains in most major countries. Sales were up in
Australia as the economy continued to register moderate growth. Sales in Japan
also increased reflecting economic recovery and higher spending in anticipation
of a 1997 sales tax increase.
In China, strong economic growth continued, but did not lead to higher sales
due to tight government policies.
Sales rose in the rest of the Asia/Pacific region. Continued strong economic
growth and investment in infrastructure projects led to higher end-user demand
for machines in most applications including forestry, housing and highway
construction. Sales of both diesel and gas engines, as well as turbines
increased.
Europe/CIS
Sales declined 12% due to a reduction in dealer new machine inventories and
a drop in industry demand, both of which were caused by slower economic growth
of Western Europe in 1996. Sales were lower in most countries, including the
United Kingdom, Germany and France. Dealer sales to end-users, however,
remained near 1995 levels due to a higher share of industry sales.
Sales to Central Europe increased reflecting good economic growth throughout
the region.
In the CIS, sales declined reflecting the continued recession and high
levels of political uncertainty, particularly in Russia.
Latin America
Sales rose 5% as higher engine sales offset a decline in machine sales.
Sales posted sizable gains in Mexico and Argentina as both economies picked up
after severe recessions in 1995. Recession led to lower sales in Venezuela, and
slower growth caused sales to decline in Brazil. End-user demand for machines
was lower for metals mining and highway construction, but higher for coal and
nonmetal mining.
Canada
Sales declined 14% after three years of growth. The economy slowed
considerably, especially early in the year, leading to a drop in industry
demand. Sales to end-users declined in most applications, although gains were
registered in metal mining and agriculture. Both diesel and gas engines, as
well as turbine sales were lower.
Africa/Middle East
Sales rose 26% for the region as a whole. Large gains were registered in
Africa which continued to benefit from profitable commodity prices, competitive
devaluations and ongoing economic reform. Much of the improvement came from
higher turbine sales, particularly in Nigeria, and from higher machine sales in
South Africa.
Dealer Inventories of Machines
United States dealers' new machine inventories increased in 1996 in response
to the improved economic and industry outlook, and at year-end were moderately
above normal relative to current selling rates. Outside the United States,
dealers' new machine inventories declined and at year-end were about normal
relative to current selling rates.
United States dealers' dedicated rental inventories were higher in December
than a year earlier and continue to be about twice the unit size of new machine
inventory.
A-31
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 COMPARED WITH 1994
Profit for 1995 of $1.14 billion or $5.72 per share was an all-time record
and an improvement of $181 million from 1994 profit of $955 million or $4.70
per share. 1995 sales and revenues of $16.07 billion, also an all-time record,
increased 12% from last year and were the most significant reason for the
higher profit.
Machinery and Engines
Sales of Machinery and Engines were $15.45 billion, $1.59 billion higher
than 1994. Profit before tax was $1.49 billion, an improvement of $281 million.
The primary reason for the increase in profit was higher sales -- a 9% increase
in physical sales volume and 2% better price realization.
The increase in physical sales volume was due to higher sales of machines
and engines both inside and outside the United States. Price realization
improved primarily because of price increases taken over the past year and the
effect of the weaker dollar as sales in European currencies translated into
more U.S. dollars. These factors were partially offset by higher sales
discounts and an unfavorable change in geographic sales mix. The benefit to
sales (and margin) of the weaker dollar was limited by currency hedges (forward
contracts) covering most U.S. manufactured product sold in Europe. The hedges
were put in place in 1991 to protect margins against potential strengthening of
the U.S. dollar. Without these currency hedges, sales and margin during the
year would have been about $135 million higher. All such forward contracts
matured during 1995.
Margin increased $422 million, primarily a result of higher sales volume and
improved price realization. These favorable items were partially offset by the
effect of the weaker dollar on costs, proportionately higher sales of lower
margin products and higher costs due to inflation. In addition, there was a
decrease in LIFO decrement benefits ($28 million in 1994 versus $22 million in
1995). Total margin as a percent of sales was 22.3%, a 0.5 percentage point
increase from a year ago.
SG&A (selling, general and administrative) expenses were up $135 million
from the previous year because of higher spending levels to support increased
sales volume and expanded operations around the world, higher costs due to
inflation and the effect of the weaker dollar as costs in European currencies
translated into more U.S. dollars. In addition, the absence of the assignment
of labor costs from SG&A to cost of goods sold for employees working in
manufacturing functions during 1994 contributed to the increase. Partially
offsetting these factors were a decrease in incentive pay expense and a
favorable adjustment to insurance reserves based on an actuarial valuation.
R&D (research and development) expenses were $64 million higher than 1994, a
result of a decrease in the assignment of labor costs from R&D to cost of goods
sold as fewer employees were working in manufacturing areas in 1995 compared
with 1994, expanded activity for new product introductions and higher costs due
to inflation.
Operating profit for 1995 was $1.59 billion, an increase of $223 million
from last year. As a percent of sales, operating profit was 10.3%, compared
with 9.9% for 1994.
Interest expense of $191 million was $9 million lower than a year ago as the
benefit of lower average debt of approximately $160 million was partially
offset by higher interest rates.
Other income/expense was income of $92 million compared with income of $43
million a year earlier. The improvement reflects the absence of a $17 million
expense in 1994 for the settlement of two class action complaints and a $10
million recovery in 1995 from the company's insurer related to this
settlement. In addition, interest on short-term investments contributed to the
increase. Partially offsetting these factors was an unfavorable change in
foreign exchange gains and losses.
Financial Products
Before-tax profit for Financial Products was $121 million, up $61 million
from 1994. The increase was a result of Cat Financial's larger portfolio of
earning assets and a $29 million favorable change in the mark-to-market
adjustment for Cat Financial's written interest rate caps. These written caps
were terminated during the second quarter of 1995.
Revenues of $621 million increased $156 million from a year ago, the result
of Cat Financial's larger portfolio.
SG&A expenses were $240 million, compared with $191 million last year. The
increase reflects a higher provision for credit losses and other volume-related
expenses at Cat Financial. Interest expense was $293 million, up $83 million
because of higher average borrowings to support the larger portfolio.
Other income/expense was income of $33 million compared with expense of $4
million a year ago. The favorable change resulted from an $11 million
mark-to-market gain for interest rate caps in 1995, compared with an $18
million mark-to-market loss in 1994.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $501 million, $147 million higher than a year ago.
The increase reflects higher before-tax profit and a 31% effective tax rate
compared with 28% in 1994.
Unconsolidated Affiliated Companies
The company's share of unconsolidated affiliated companies' profits was $22
million, down $14 million because of the unfavorable impact of the stronger
yen on SCM (Shin Caterpillar Mitsubishi Ltd.) sales outside Japan and lower
land sale gains at SCM in 1995.
LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES
- -----------------------------
Consolidated operating cash flow totaled $1.78 billion through the
fourth-quarter of 1996, compared with $2.19 billion for the twelve months of
1995.
Total debt at the end of 1996 was $7.46 billion, an increase of $1.06
billion from year-end 1995. Over this period, debt related to Machinery and
Engines decreased $43 million, to $2.18 billion, while debt related to
Financial Products increased $1.10 billion to $5.28 billion.
During 1995, the company announced a plan to repurchase up to 10% of its
outstanding common stock over the next three to five years. At December 31,
1996, 10.9 million shares had been purchased under the plan.
A-32
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machinery and Engines
Operating cash flow totaled $1.46 billion through the fourth-quarter of
1996, compared with $1.95 billion through the fourth-quarter of 1995. The cash
flow decrease is primarily the result of increased receivables.
Capital expenditures, excluding equipment leased to others and excluding
$136 million associated with acquisitions, totaled $500 million through the
fourth-quarter of 1996 compared with $460 million in 1995.
During 1996, investments and acquisitions totaled $612 million compared
with $21 million for the previous year. In addition, employee benefit plans were
prefunded by $200 million in 1996.
The percent of debt to debt plus stockholders equity improved to 35% at
December 31, 1996, from 40% at December 31, 1995.
Financial Products
Operating cash flow totaled $331 million for 1996, compared with $244
million for 1995. Cash used to purchase equipment leased to others totaled $257
million for 1996. In addition, 1996 net cash used for finance receivables was
$970 million, compared with $820 million for 1995.
Financial Products' debt was $5.28 billion at December 31, 1996, an
increase of $1.10 billion from December 31, 1995, and was primarily comprised of
$2.54 billion of medium term notes, $257 million of notes payable to banks and
$2.38 billion of commercial paper. At the end of 1996, finance receivables past
due over 30 days were 2.1%, compared with 2.0% at the end of the same period one
year ago. The ratio of debt to equity of Cat Financial was 7.8:1 at December 31,
1996, compared with 7.7:1 at December 31, 1995.
Financial Products had outstanding credit lines totaling $3.77 billion at
year-end 1996, which included $1.84 billion of the company's revolving credit
agreement. These credit lines are with a number of banks and are considered
support for the company's outstanding commercial paper, commercial paper
guarantees, the discounting of bank and trade bills and bank borrowings.
Dividends
Quarterly dividends paid per share of common stock for the last three years
were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Quarter 1996 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First.......................................... $ .35 $ .25 $.07
Second......................................... .35 .25 .08
Third.......................................... .40 .35 .15
Fourth......................................... .40 .35 .15
----- ----- ----
$1.50 $1.20 $.45
===== ===== ====
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
EMPLOYMENT
- ----------
At year-end, Caterpillar's worldwide employment was 57,026, compared with
54,352 one year ago. Hourly employment increased 1,046 to 33,040; salaried and
management employment increased 1,628 to 23,986. The increased employment is
primarily the result of acquisitions and also due to expanded operations and
major growth initiatives, partially offset by attrition.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year-End Employment 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Inside United States....... 38,571 39,978
Outside United States
Europe................... 11,953 8,413
Latin America............ 4,540 4,104
Asia/Pacific............. 1,746 1,630
Canada................... 127 121
Other.................... 89 106
------ ------
18,455 18,455 14,374 14,374
------ ------
Total Employment........... 57,026 54,352
====== ======
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
OTHER MATTERS
- -------------
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
At this time, based on current regulations, the potential impact of
environmental regulation compliance on the company's capital expenditures,
earnings and competitive position is not expected to be material.
The company is involved in a number of remediation actions to clean up
hazardous wastes as required by federal and state laws. These laws often
require responsible parties to fund remediation actions regardless of fault,
legality of original disposal or ownership of a disposal site. Under accounting
guidelines, the company is required to accrue and charge to income management's
best estimate of future costs associated with these sites. When there appears
to be a range of possible costs with equal likelihood, liabilities are based on
the lower end of that range. For 1996, the amount accrued for potential
clean-up costs is contained in the line item, "Accounts payable and accrued
expenses" in Statement 3, and represents an immaterial portion of that line
item. While the company may have rights of contribution or reimbursement under
insurance policies, amounts that may be recoverable from other entities are not
considered in establishing the accrual.
In deciding upon amounts to be reserved for potential environmental
liability at a particular site, the company looks at several factors including:
. prior experience regarding environmental remediation at a similar
site;
. experience of other companies at a similar site;
. technology available for remediation at the time;
. the stage of remediation for the particular site (i.e., whether the
site is at the identification stage or whether a remedial
investigation or feasibility study has been conducted);
. documentation, if any, linking the company to a particular site;
. the amount the company has been asked to contribute to a particular
site; and
. aspects of the law under which the company is alleged to be liable
for clean up.
The company also looks at these factors in deciding whether it could incur
liabilities beyond those which it has accrued for future remediation. It is
difficult to estimate potential liability at sites in very early stages of
remediation (of which the company has seven currently). At this time, however,
the company believes the likelihood of incurring any material environmental
liability beyond that accrued is remote.
A-33
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LITIGATION
The company is involved in litigation matters which are normal in the course
of its operations. The results of these matters cannot be predicted with
certainty; however, management believes, based on the advice of legal counsel,
the final outcome will not have a materially adverse effect on the company's
consolidated financial position.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
In the first quarter of 1994, the company changed its method of computing
LIFO (last-in, first-out) inventories from a single pool approach to a multiple
pool approach for substantially all of its inventories. The company believes
that the multiple pool method results in a better matching of revenues and
expenses. The cumulative effect of the change on prior years was not
determinable. This change did not have a material effect on 1994 results of
operations or financial position.
In June 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 125, "Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities." This statement establishes new criteria for determining whether a
transfer of financial assets should be accounted for as a sale or as a secured
borrowing. The accounting treatment of such transactions focuses on who
controls the transferred assets, and whether or not those assets have been
isolated from the transferor and put beyond the reach of its creditors. This
standard is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996, and will
therefore be adopted in 1997. It will not have a material impact on the
company's financial position or results of operations.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative financial instruments are principally used by the company in the
management of foreign currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures.
Foreign Currency
Movements in foreign currency exchange rates create a degree of risk to the
company's operations. These movements affect:
. The U.S. dollar value of sales made in foreign currencies, and
. The U.S. dollar value of costs incurred in foreign currencies.
Changing currency exchange rates also affect the company's competitive
position, as exchange rate changes may affect profitability and business
and/or pricing strategies of non-U.S. based competitors.
The company's policy is to use foreign currency related derivative
instruments only as needed to operate the business and protect the company's
interests. The company only enters into foreign currency related derivative
instruments to neutralize risk -- not as speculative instruments. The company
buys and sells currencies only in amounts large enough to cover business needs,
and to protect its financial and competitive position. The company's general
approach is to manage future foreign currency cash flow for Machinery and
Engines operations and net foreign currency balance sheet exposures for
Financial Products operations.
In managing foreign currency for Machinery and Engines operations, the
company's objective is to maximize consolidated aftertax U.S. dollar cash flow.
To this end, the company's policy allows for actively managing:
. cash flow related to firmly committed foreign currency transactions;
. anticipated foreign currency cash flow for a future rolling twelve-
month period; and
. outstanding hedging transactions.
The company uses forward exchange contracts and foreign currency option
contracts (purchased option contracts and/or combination option contracts) to
manage its foreign currency risk. When using forward exchange contracts, the
company is protected from unfavorable exchange rate movements, but has given up
any potential benefit from favorable changes in exchange rates. Purchased
option contracts, on the other hand, protect from unfavorable rate movements
while permitting the company to benefit from the effect of favorable exchange
rate fluctuations. The company does not use historic rate rollovers or
leveraged options, nor does it sell foreign currency options, except in the
case of combination option contracts that limit the unfavorable effect of
exchange rate movements, while allowing a limited potential benefit from
favorable exchange rate movements. None of the forward exchange or foreign
currency option contracts used by the company are exchange traded.
Each month, the company's financial officers approve the company's outlook
for expected currency exchange rate movements, as well as its policy on desired
future foreign currency cash flow positions (long, short, balanced) for those
currencies in which the company has significant activity. Financial officers
receive a daily report on currency exchange rates, cash flow exposure and open
foreign currency hedges. Expected future cash flow positions and strategies are
continuously monitored. The company's foreign exchange management practices,
including the use of derivative financial instruments, are presented to the
Audit Committee of the company's board of directors at least annually.
The following table summarizes the anticipated cash inflows and outflows
for the next 12 months, including those cash flows from firmly committed foreign
currency transactions for Machinery and Engines operations. The table also shows
the contractual amounts of related outstanding forward exchange and foreign
currency option contracts, excluding European cross-currency hedge contracts
totaling $122 million, as of December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Millions of dollars) Exposures Hedges
--------------------- -------------------
Buy Sell
Foreign Foreign
Inflows Outflows Currency Currency
------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
European Currencies............. $2,394 $3,039 $125 $ --
Japanese Yen.................... 268 633 58 --
Australian Dollar............... 582 256 -- 124
Brazilian Real.................. 306 331 -- --
Canadian Dollar................. 133 143 1 --
All Other Currencies............ 13 173 -- --
</TABLE>
In managing foreign currency for Financial Products operations, the
company's objective is to minimize earnings volatility resulting from the
translation of net foreign currency balance sheet positions.
As of December 31, 1996, the Financial Products operations had $630 million
in forward exchange contracts to sell European
A-34
<PAGE>
Caterpillar Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
currencies hedging their net European currency denominated asset position.
Except for changes related to business volume, the company's annual foreign
currency cash flow for Machinery and Engines operations and net balance sheet
exposures for Financial Products operations for periods beyond the next twelve
months are not expected to be materially different from those indicated above.
Interest Rate
To manage its exposure to interest rate changes and lower the cost of
borrowed funds, the company uses various interest rate derivative instruments,
including interest rate swap agreements, interest rate cap (option) agreements
and forward rate agreements. At the time these agreements are executed, they
are linked to a specific debt instrument. The company enters into such
agreements only with financial institutions, which in the opinion of
management, will not expose the company to undue credit loss exposure. The
company's Financial Products subsidiaries, in connection with their match
funding objective, use interest rate derivative instruments to modify debt
structures to match fund receivable portfolios. This match funding reduces the
risk of deteriorating margins between interest-bearing assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, regardless of which direction interest rates
move. The company, including Financial Products subsidiaries, also uses these
instruments to gain an economic and/or competitive advantage through a lower
cost of borrowed funds. This is accomplished by changing the characteristics of
existing debt instruments or entering into new agreements in combination with
the issuance of new debt.
Commodity Prices
The company's operations are also subject to commodity price risk, as
material prices change with movements in underlying commodity prices. The
company has used some commodity swap and option agreements to reduce this risk.
However, the use of these types of derivative financial instruments has not
been material.
1997 ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRY OUTLOOK
- ----------------------------------
World economic growth, excluding the CIS, should be similar to that
experienced in 1996. Faster growth in Canada, Europe and Latin America should
offset somewhat slower growth in the United States, Japan, Australia and
Africa/Middle East. Strong growth should continue in Asia. Including the CIS,
where economic recovery is expected, world growth should exceed last year's
level.
In this economic environment, worldwide industry demand for machines is
expected to remain near 1996 levels as slightly lower demand in the United
States and Japan is offset by stronger demand in Latin America, Asia and
Canada. Worldwide industry demand for engines is also forecast to remain
essentially unchanged as lower demand for truck engines is offset by higher
demand for commercial engines. Demand for turbines is expected to meet or
exceed 1996 levels.
U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is forecast to slow slightly from growth
of about 2.5% in 1996 to 2% in 1997 due to lower housing starts and slower
growth in consumer and business spending. Mining and nonresidential
construction activity should continue to grow. Inflation is forecast to remain
near 1996 levels and interest rates are not expected to rise. The slowdown in
overall economic growth combined with a decline in housing starts should result
in a slight decline in industry demand for machines. Heavy duty on-highway
truck demand is forecast to decline further in 1997, but commercial engine
demand should continue to rise. In Canada, better economic growth, low interest
rates and higher levels of mining and construction activity should lead to
higher industry demand for machines. Heavy duty truck engine demand will
continue to decline.
In Western Europe, GDP growth is forecast to improve somewhat from about 2%
in 1996 to about 2.5% in 1997. Short-term interest rates are at record low
levels, and there is considerable pent-up demand. Normally, this would lead to
a forecast of higher industry demand. Instead, demand is expected to remain
near 1996 levels due to delays of infrastructure projects as countries impose
fiscal constraints to meet the entry criteria for the European Monetary Union.
In Central Europe, good economic growth should continue resulting in better
industry demand.
Excellent economic growth is forecast to continue throughout developing
Asia, leading to higher industry demand. In Japan, the economy is expected to
slow as a result of a planned April 1 sales tax increase and the anticipated
expiration of fiscal stimulus spending. This slower growth and tighter fiscal
policy make any improvement in the industry unlikely. In Australia, growth is
forecast to slow somewhat but remain strong enough to keep industry demand near
1996 levels.
In Latin America, faster economic growth along with an improvement in
construction activity should lead to increased machine demand. In other
regions, slower but still moderate growth in Africa/Middle East will likely
keep demand near 1996 levels, while recovery in the CIS should contribute to
higher sales.
1997 COMPANY OUTLOOK
- --------------------
Worldwide company sales and revenues from ongoing operations are expected to
slightly surpass 1996 levels as higher industry demand in the developing
regions should offset slightly lower industry demand in the United States and
Japan. With worldwide industry demand near 1996 levels, the sales improvement
is expected from a forecasted increase in share of industry sales and limited
price increases. Sales will also be higher due to the acquisition of MaK
Motoren GmbH which occurred at the end of 1996.
In 1997, company investments to enhance long-term growth will continue to
accelerate. Major initiatives include electric power generation, agricultural
products, mining systems, compact machines and further strengthening of our
product support network to better link customer, dealer and company operations.
Additionally, the company will continue investing in manufacturing operations
and product support infrastructure in China and the CIS. Total capital
expenditures, which were $642 million for 1996 including $136 million
associated with acquisitions, are expected to increase 10 to 15% for 1997. (The
10 to 15% estimate for 1997 excludes any capital expenditures associated with
potential acquisitions.) R&D expenditures, which totaled $410 million in 1996,
are expected to increase about 20% to support product line expansion in 1997.
Investments such as these are needed to fuel the company's projected growth
over
A-35
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the next few years. Cash flow from operations will be strong and the company's
balance sheet will remain solid.
Despite the increased level of investment for growth initiatives, profit
for 1997 should approximate the 1996 level. Profit per share will continue to
benefit from the buy-back program announced in June 1995. The company now
anticipates the 10% share repurchase will be largely complete by year-end 1997.
The information included in the Outlook section is forward looking and
involves risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected
results. A discussion of these risks and uncertainties is contained in Form 8-K
filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on January 21, 1997.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS []
A-36
<PAGE>
SUPPLEMENTAL STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION
Annual Meeting
On Wednesday, April 9, 1997, at 10:30 a.m., PST, the annual meeting of
stockholders will be held at the Loews Coronado, Coronado, California. Requests
for proxies are being sent to stockholders with this report mailed on or
about February 28, 1997.
Stock Transfer Agent
First Chicago Trust Company of New York
P.O. Box 2500
Jersey City, NJ 07303-2500
Telephone: (201) 324-0498
Stock Exchange Listings
Caterpillar common stock is listed on stock exchanges in the United States,
Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain and Switzerland.
Number of Stockholders
Stockholders of record at year-end totaled 30,573, compared with 31,585 at
the end of 1995. Approximately 4.5% of the outstanding shares are held by
29,274 individuals. The remaining shares are held by trustees, banks and other
institutions for additional thousands of owners.
Employees' investment and profit-sharing plans acquired 1,378,928 shares of
Caterpillar stock in 1996. Investment plans, for which membership is voluntary,
held 12,474,796 shares for employee accounts at 1996 year-end. Profit-sharing
plans, in which membership is automatic for most U.S. and Canadian employees in
eligible categories, held 254,228 shares at 1996 year-end.
Common Stock Price Range
Quarterly price ranges of Caterpillar common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange, the principal market in which the stock is traded, were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------------- ------------------
Quarter High Low High Low
- ------- ---- --- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First..................... 73-7/8 54 58-7/8 48-1/4
Second.................... 71-7/8 62 65-1/4 55
Third..................... 75-7/8 62-3/4 75-1/4 56-1/8
Fourth.................... 81 68-1/4 63-1/8 50-3/4
</TABLE>
Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan
An Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan -- administered by First Chicago
Trust Company of New York -- is available to stockholders. The plan provides a
convenient, low-cost method for stockholders to increase their ownership in
Caterpillar common stock. In addition, stockholders who elect to participate
can make optional cash payments to purchase more Caterpillar shares.
Participation may begin with any regularly scheduled dividend payment if an
authorization form is completed and returned to the administrator prior to the
dividend record date. Stockholders wishing further information may contact
First Chicago Trust Company of New York, P.O. Box 13531, Newark, New Jersey
07188-0001. On the Internet: http://www.fctc.com. E-mail: [email protected]. Hearing
impaired: (201) 222-4955.
Publications for Stockholders
Single copies of the company's 1996 annual report on Securities and
Exchange Commission Form 10-K (without exhibits) will be provided without
charge to stockholders after March 31, 1997, upon written request to:
Secretary
Caterpillar Inc.
100 N.E. Adams Street
Peoria, IL 61629-7310
The company also makes available to stockholders copies of its Form 10-Q
reports. 10-Q reports are available in May, August and November.
Investor Inquiries
For those seeking additional information about the corporation --
Institutional analysts, portfolio managers and representatives of financial
institutions should contact:
James F. Masterson
Director of Investor Relations
Caterpillar Inc.
100 N.E. Adams Street
Peoria, IL 61629-5310
Telephone: (309) 675-4549
Facsimile: (309) 675-4457
E-mail: [email protected]
Individual stockholders should contact:
Laurie J. Huxtable
Assistant Secretary
Caterpillar Inc.
100 N.E. Adams Street
Peoria, IL 61629-7310
Telephone: (309) 675-4619
Internet Access
http://www.CAT.com
A-37
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
DIRECTORS
Lilyan H. Affinito/2,4/ Former Vice Chairman, Maxxam Group Inc.
W. Frank Blount/1,3/ Chief Executive Officer, Telstra Corporation Limited
John T. Dillon/2,4,6/ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, International
Paper
Donald V. Fites/3,4/ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Caterpillar Inc.
John W. Fondahl/2,4,5/ Civil Engineer
David R. Goode/1,2/ Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, Norfolk
Southern Corporation
James P. Gorter/1,2/ Chairman, Baker, Fentress & Company
Peter A. Magowan/2,4/ Chairman, Safeway Inc.; President & Managing General
Partner, San Francisco Giants
Gordon R. Parker/1,3/ Former Chairman, Newmont Mining Corporation and
Newmont Gold Company
George A. Schaefer/1,3/ Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Caterpillar Inc.
Joshua I. Smith/3,4/ Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, The MAXIMA
Corporation
Clayton K. Yeutter/2,4/ Of Counsel to Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D.C.
/1/Member of Audit Committee (David R. Goode, chairman)
/2/Member of Compensation Committee (James P. Gorter, chairman)
/3/Member of Nominating Committee (Joshua I. Smith, chairman)
/4/Member of Public Policy Committee (Clayton K. Yeutter, chairman)
/5/Retiring from the board of directors effective April 9, 1997
/6/Effective February 12, 1997
OFFICERS
Donald V. Fites Chairman
Glen A. Barton Group President
Gerald S. Flaherty Group President
James W. Owens Group President
Richard L. Thompson Group President
R. Rennie Atterbury III Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
James W. Baldwin Vice President
Vito H. Baumgartner Vice President
James S. Beard Vice President
Richard A. Benson Vice President
Ronald P. Bonati Vice President
James E. Despain Vice President
Roger E. Fischbach Vice President
Michael A. Flexsenhar Vice President
Donald M. Ings Vice President
Duane H. Livingston Vice President
Daniel M. Murphy Vice President
Douglas R. Oberhelman Vice President
Gerald Palmer Vice President
Robert C. Petterson Vice President
John E. Pfeffer Vice President
Siegfried R. Ramseyer Vice President
Alan J. Rassi Vice President
Gerald L. Shaheen Vice President
Gary A. Stroup Vice President
Sherril K. West Vice President
Donald G. Western Vice President
Wayne M. Zimmerman Vice President
Robert R. Gallagher Controller
F. Lynn McPheeters Treasurer
Robin D. Beran Assistant Treasurer
Mary J. Callahan Assistant Secretary
Laurie J. Huxtable Assistant Secretary
__________
Note: All director/officer information is as of December 31, 1996, except as
noted above.
A-38
<PAGE>
NOTES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-39
<PAGE>
NOTES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-40
<PAGE>
NOTES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-41
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF CATERPILLAR]
<PAGE>
PROXY AND VOTING INSTRUCTION
CATERPILLAR INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - APRIL 9, 1997
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on April 9, 1997, or
at any adjournments thereof, the undersigned hereby appoints (i) G.A. SCHAEFER
and C.K. YEUTTER, and each of them, proxies with power of substitution to vote
the common stock of the undersigned and (ii) THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, as
Trustee, to appoint G. A. SCHAEFER and C.K. YEUTTER and each or either of them,
with power of substitution, proxies to vote all shares of the Company's stock
credited to the accounts of the undersigned under the Employees' Investment
Plan Trust and/or the Caterpillar Inc. Investment Trust at the close of business
on February 10, 1997, as directed hereon on the following matters, and, in their
discretion, on any other matters that may come before the meeting.
Election of Directors. Nominees: L.H. Affinito, D.V. Fites, D.R Goode, J.I.
Smith
You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE
REVERSE SIDE, but you need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance
with the Board of Directors' recommendations. THIS CARD ALSO CONSTITUTES VOTING
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANY SHARES HELD BY THE UNDERSIGNED IN ANY COMPANY EMPLOYEE
INVESTMENT PLANS.
Please mark, sign, date and return this Proxy and Voting Instruction card
promptly using the enclosed envelope.
-----------
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
-----------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
<PAGE>
[X] Please mark your 1433
votes as in this
example.
Unless otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees for directors listed, FOR proposal 2 and AGAINST proposal 3.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR election of directors and proposal
2.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD
1. Election of [_] [_]
Directors
(See Reverse)
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
2. Appointment of [_] [_] [_]
Independent
Auditors
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST stockholder proposal 3.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Stockholder proposal [_] [_] [_]
ANNUAL REPORT
Mark here to discontinue annual report mailing for this account (for multiple-
account holders only). [_]
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon, Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such.
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
Annual Meeting
of
Caterpillar Inc. Stockholders
Wednesday, April 9, 1997
10:30 a.m.
Loews Coronado
4000 Coronado Bay
Coronado, California
================================================================================
Agenda
------
* Election of Directors
* Approve appointment of independent auditors
* Act on one stockholder proposal
* Conduct other business properly brought before the meeting
================================================================================
<PAGE>
PROXY
CATERPILLAR INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - APRIL 9, 1997
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on April 9, 1997, or
at any adjournments thereof, the undersigned hereby appoints G.A. SCHAEFER
and C.K. YEUTTER, and each of them, proxies with power of substitution to vote
the stock of the undersigned on the following matters, and, in their discretion,
on any other matters that may come before the meeting.
Election of Directors. Nominees: L.H. Affinito, D.V. Fites, D.R Goode, J.I.
Smith
You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE
REVERSE SIDE, but you need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance
with the Board of Directors' recommendations.
Please mark, sign, date and return this Proxy promptly using the enclosed
envelope.
-----------
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
-----------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
<PAGE>
[X] Please mark your 1433
votes as in this
example.
Unless otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees for directors listed, FOR proposal 2 and AGAINST proposal 3.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR election of directors and proposal
2.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD
1. Election of [_] [_]
Directors
(See Reverse)
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
2. Appointment of [_] [_] [_]
Independent
Auditors
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST stockholder proposal 3.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Stockholder proposal [_] [_] [_]
ANNUAL REPORT
Mark here to discontinue annual report mailing for this account (for multiple-
account holders only). [_]
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon, Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such.
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
Annual Meeting
of
Caterpillar Inc. Stockholders
Wednesday, April 9, 1997
10:30 a.m.
Loews Coronado
4000 Coronado Bay
Coronado, California
================================================================================
Agenda
------
* Election of Directors
* Approve appointment of independent auditors
* Act on one stockholder proposal
* Conduct other business properly brought before the meeting
================================================================================
<PAGE>
VOTING INSTRUCTION
CATERPILLAR INC.
ANNUAL MEETING - APRIL 9, 1997
This voting instruction is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on April 9, 1997, or
at any adjournments thereof, the undersigned hereby authorizes THE NORTHERN
TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, to appoint G. A. SCHAEFER and C.K. YEUTTER, and each
or either of them, with power of substitution, proxies to vote all shares of the
Company's stock credited to the accounts of the undersigned under the Employees'
Investment Plan Trust at the close of business on February 10, 1997, as directed
hereon on the following matters, and, in their discretion, on any other matters
that may come before the meeting.
Election of Directors. Nominees: L.H. Affinito, D.V. Fites, D.R Goode, J.I.
Smith
-----------
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
-----------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
<PAGE>
[X] Please mark your 1433
votes as in this
example.
Unless otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees for directors listed, FOR proposal 2 and AGAINST proposal 3.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR election of directors and proposal
2.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD
1. Election of [_] [_]
Directors
(See Reverse)
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
2. Appointment of [_] [_] [_]
Independent
Auditors
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST stockholder proposal 3.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Stockholder proposal [_] [_] [_]
ANNUAL REPORT
Mark here to discontinue annual report mailing for this account (for multiple-
account holders only). [_]
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon, Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such.
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
Annual Meeting
of
Caterpillar Inc. Stockholders
Wednesday, April 9, 1997
10:30 a.m.
Loews Coronado
4000 Coronado Bay
Coronado, California
================================================================================
Agenda
------
* Election of Directors
* Approve appointment of independent auditors
* Act on one stockholder proposal
* Conduct other business properly brought before the meeting
================================================================================
<PAGE>
VOTING INSTRUCTION
CATERPILLAR INC.
ANNUAL MEETING - APRIL 9, 1997
This voting instruction is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on April 9, 1997, or
at any adjournments thereof, the undersigned hereby authorizes THE CANADA TRUST
COMPANY, as Trustee, to appoint G.A. SCHAEFER and C.K. YEUTTER, and each or
either of them, with power of substitution, proxies to vote all shares of the
Company's stock credited to the accounts of the undersigned under the Employees'
Investment Plan Trust at the close of business on February 10, 1997, as directed
hereon on the following matters, and, in their discretion, on any other matters
that may come before the meeting.
Election of Directors. Nominees: L.H. Affinito, D.V. Fites, D.R Goode, J.I.
Smith
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
<PAGE>
[X] Please mark your 9050
votes as in this
example.
Unless otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees for directors listed, FOR proposal 2 and AGAINST proposal 3.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR election of directors and proposal
2.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD
1. Election of [_] [_]
Directors
(See Reverse)
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
2. Appointment of [_] [_] [_]
Independent
Auditors
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST stockholder proposal 3.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Stockholder proposal [_] [_] [_]
ANNUAL REPORT
Mark here to discontinue annual report mailing for this account (for multiple-
account holders only). [_]
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such.
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
Annual Meeting
of
Caterpillar Inc. Stockholders
Wednesday, April 9, 1997
10:30 a.m.
Loews Coronado
4000 Coronado Bay
Coronado, California
================================================================================
Agenda
------
* Election of Directors
* Approve appointment of independent auditors
* Act on one stockholder proposal
* Conduct other business properly brought before the meeting
================================================================================
<PAGE>
PROXY
CATERPILLAR INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - APRIL 9, 1997
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on April 9, 1997, or
at any adjournments thereof, the undersigned hereby appoints G.A. SCHAEFER and
C.K. YEUTTER, and each of them, proxies with power of substitution to vote the
stock of the undersigned on the following matters, and, in their discretion, on
any other matters that may come before the meeting.
Election of Directors. Nominees: L.H. Affinito, D.V. Fites, D.R Goode, J.I.
Smith
You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE
REVERSE SIDE, but you need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance
with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Please mark, sign, date and return
this Proxy promptly using the enclosed envelope.
-----------
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
-----------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
<PAGE>
[X] Please mark your 1433
votes as in this
example.
Unless otherwise specified, proxies will be voted FOR the election of the
nominees for directors listed, FOR proposal 2 and AGAINST proposal 3.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR election of directors and proposal
2.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD
1. Election of [_] [_]
Directors
(See Reverse)
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
2. Appointment of [_] [_] [_]
Independent
Auditors
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ----------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST stockholder proposal 3.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Stockholder proposal [_] [_] [_]
ANNUAL REPORT
Mark here to discontinue annual report mailing for this account (for multiple-
account holders only). [_]
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such.
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. FOLD AND DETACH HERE .
Annual Meeting
of
Caterpillar Inc. Stockholders
Wednesday, April 9, 1997
10:30 a.m.
Loews Coronado
4000 Coronado Bay
Coronado, California
================================================================================
Agenda
------
* Election of Directors
* Approve appointment of independent auditors
* Act on one stockholder proposal
* Conduct other business properly brought before the meeting
================================================================================
