CENTRAL & SOUTH WEST CORP
8-K, 1995-06-09
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: CENTEX CORP, 8-K, 1995-06-09
Next: CERTRON CORP, 10-Q, 1995-06-09



                              
                                                            
             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                  WASHINGTON, D.C.   20549
                              
                              
                          FORM  8-K
                              
                              
                       CURRENT REPORT
                              
             Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
             the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                              
                              
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):     June 9, 1995

Commission        Registrant, State of Incorporation,      I.R.S. Employer
File Number         Address and Telephone Number          Identification No.


1-1443            Central and South West Corporation         51-0007707
                  (A Delaware Corporation)
                  1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
                  Dallas, TX 75202-1234
                  (214) 777-1000















ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS

CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION (CSW) AND EL PASO
ELECTRIC COMPANY (EL PASO) PROPOSED MERGER

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On June 9, 1995, CSW sent a letter to El Paso terminating
their merger agreement (Merger Agreement) and declining to
extend the termination date under the Merger Agreement as
requested by El Paso in its May 22, 1995 letter to CSW.
CSW's  June 9, 1995 letter also informed El Paso that it was
revoking the Modified Third Amended Plan of Reorganization
for the proposed merger with El Paso by a contemporaneous
filing with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas, Austin Division, before which the
El Paso bankruptcy reorganization proceeding, Case No. 92-
10148-FM is pending.  The letter is attached as Exhibit
99.1.  In addition, on June 9, 1995, CSW issued a press
release announcing that it had terminated the Merger
Agreement with El Paso because conditions for completing the
proposed merger had not been satisfied and because El Paso
had breached their agreement.  The press release is attached
as Exhibit 99.2.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
For background information and earlier developments related
to the proposed merger with El Paso, reference is made to
CSW's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1995, Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 23, 1995 and the documents
referenced therein.

OTHER
El Paso is subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and in
accordance therewith files reports and other information
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  For additional
information concerning El Paso and the proposed merger, see
El Paso's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994 and its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 1995 and the documents
referenced therein or supplementary thereto.

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.




                                   CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION


Date:  June 9, 1995

                                   By:  /s/ Wendy G. Hargus
                                            Wendy G. Hargus
                                            Controller


EXHIBIT 99.1

                                                      Letter from CSW to
                                                      El Paso dated 6/9/95
  Central and South West Corporation
     1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
P.O. Box 660164 - Dallas,Texas 75266-0164
              214-777-1096
                              
          FERD. C. MEYER, JR.
         Senior Vice President
                  and
            General Counsel


                                   June 9, 1995


Mr. David H. Wiggs, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Curtis L. Hoskins
President
Board of Directors
El Paso Electric Company
303 North Oregon
El Paso, Texas  79901

           Re:  Notice of Termination and Response to
                Request for Extension of Termination Date

Gentlemen:

      This  letter (i) constitutes notice of termination  of
the  Agreement  and Plan of Merger among  El  Paso  Electric
Company  ("EPE"), Central and South West Corporation ("CSW")
and  CSW  Sub, Inc. ("CSW Sub") dated as of May 3, 1993,  as
amended (the "Merger Agreement"), and (ii) responds  to  the
May   22,  1995  letter  from  EPE  requesting  a  six-month
extension of the Termination Date.

      Pursuant  to Sections 9.1(b) and (d) and 10.1  of  the
Merger   Agreement,  CSW,  by  and  through  its  Board   of
Directors,  hereby  gives its notice of termination  of  the
Merger  Agreement to EPE's President and Board of Directors.
CSW  also declines to grant EPE's requested extension of the
Termination Date because CSW has reasonably determined  that
one  or  more  closing  conditions are  incapable  of  being
satisfied  on  or before the Termination Date  as  extended.
The  granting  of the extension would therefore  be  futile.
Moreover,  EPE's extension request is not supportable  under
existing facts and circumstances.

I.   Termination - Failure of Conditions

      CSW has the right to terminate the Merger Agreement if
one  or  more of the closing conditions set forth in Article
VIII  of the Merger Agreement have not been satisfied on  or
before  June  8,  1995.  As described herein,  a  number  of
closing  conditions  were not fulfilled  by  June  8,  1995.
These  unsatisfied closing conditions include, but  are  not
limited to, the following:



 Central Power and Light Company - Public Service Company of
       Oklahoma - Southwestern Electric Power Company
 West Texas Utilities Company - Transok, Inc. - Central and
                  South West Services, Inc.


Mr. David H. Wiggs, Jr.
June 9, 1995
Page 2



           A.   All  required regulatory approvals and  rate
     orders  of the Public Utility Commission of Texas,  the
     New  Mexico  Public  Utility  Commission,  the  Federal
     Energy   Regulatory  Commission,  the  Securities   and
     Exchange   Commission,  and  the   Nuclear   Regulatory
     Commission  must  have been received and  become  Final
     Orders  and  must  be in effect.  Merger  Agreement  at
     Sections 8.2(b), 8.3(g).

           B.   No  Governmental Authority  shall  have
     enacted  any law, rule, regulation, or  ordinance,
     or  issued  an  order,  that  would  have  an  EPE
     Material Adverse Effect upon the prospects for the
     business  of  Reorganized EPE  after  the  Merger.
     Merger Agreement at Section 8.2(c).

          C.  No EPE Material Adverse Effect shall have
     occurred  and no fact or circumstance shall  exist
     which  may reasonably be expected to give rise  to
     an  EPE Material Adverse Effect.  Merger Agreement
     at Section 8.3(f).

II.  Termination - Breaches

     In a letter dated May 23, 1995, CSW gave written notice
of   EPE's   material   breaches  of  its   representations,
warranties,  covenants,  and  agreements  under  the  Merger
Agreement and requested that the breaches be remedied within
ten  (10)  days  of  receipt thereof.   The  May  23  letter
identified the following material breaches:

    *     EPE's failure to remedy the material adverse effects
          identified  in  his  September  12,  1994   letter
          (constituting breaches of EPE's representations and
          warranties under Sections  3.6  and  8.3(b) and its
          covenants and agreements under Sections  5.2(o) and
          (p) and 6.8  of  the  Merger Agreement);

    *     EPE's action in Bankruptcy Court seeking to enjoin
          the PUCT, which  caused  the PUCT to postpone  its
          consideration of the Merger, and which filings were
          not provided to CSW in advance (constituting breaches
          of EPE's agreements and covenants under Sections
          5.2(o), 6.8 and 7.1 of the  Merger Agreement);

    *     EPE's pursuit of a stand-alone plan  in  lieu   of
          the proposed Merger, including actively participating
          in  discussions  with,  and  otherwise  assisting,
          facilitating,   and   encouraging  other  persons,
          including representatives of EPE's  creditors  and
          shareholders, in connection with possible proposals
          regarding  reorganization  of  EPE,  and expending
          substantial sums in doing  so,  thereby   reducing
          EPE's  value   and  breaching Sections  5.3(b) and
          6.8 of the Merger  Agreement; and


Mr. David H. Wiggs, Jr.
June 9, 1995
Page 3



    *     EPE's action, in further pursuit of a stand-alone
          plan, to reward its own senior  management through
          abnormal stock option grants in breach of Sections
          5.2(g) and 5.2(m) of the Merger Agreement.

     These breaches have not been cured.  In addition, EPE's
pursuit   of  a  stand-alone  plan  constitutes   a   breach
permitting  termination  under Section  9.1(b)(iii)  of  the
Merger Agreement.

III. Merger Agreement Void; Plan Revoked

      By  virtue of this termination, effective upon receipt
of  this letter, the Merger Agreement has become void and no
further  liability exists on the part of CSW or its officers
or directors to any party.  Merger Agreement at Section 9.2.

      CSW  reserved the right under the Plan,  at  any  time
prior to the Effective Date, with or without approval of the
Bankruptcy Court, to revoke or withdraw the Plan.   Plan  at
Section 6.7. Accordingly, CSW hereby gives its notice to EPE
of revocation  of  the   Plan,   which   notice   shall   be
contemporaneously   filed   with   the   Bankruptcy   Court.
Consequently, the Plan and confirmation order shall be of no
further force or effect.

      The  decision of CSW's Board of Directors to terminate
the  Merger  Agreement was made only after a careful  review
and  consideration  of  all facts and circumstances  bearing
thereon.   We regret that CSW's best efforts did not  result
in  the consummation of the Merger under the terms set forth
in the Merger Agreement.

                         Very truly yours,

                         CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION


                         By:  Ferd. C. Meyer, Jr.
                              Senior Vice President
                                 and General Counsel


FCM/ml

cc:  Akin, Gump, Strauss,
       Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.
     4100 First City Center
     1700 Pacific Avenue
     Dallas, TX  75201-4518
     Attn.:  Allen P. Miller, P.C.



EXHIBIT 99.2

                                             Press Release
                                             Issued 6/9/95
               CSW     
Central and South West Corporation
     
News Release

     
        Central and South West Corporation terminates
       merger agreement with El Paso Electric Company,
   cites breach of agreement and material adverse effects
                              
     Dallas (June 9, 1995)--Central and South West

Corporation (NYSE: CSR) said it notified El Paso Electric

Company today that it is terminating the companies' proposed

merger because conditions for completing the agreement have

not been satisfied and because El Paso Electric has breached

the merger agreement.

     Central and South West said its board of directors

rejected a May 22 request from El Paso Electric to extend

the merger agreement for six months until December 8.

     "We have used our best efforts to complete the merger,

investing many thousands of hours and millions of dollars,"

said E.R. Brooks, chairman, president and chief executive

officer of Central and South West.  "Our decision to

terminate the merger agreement is in the best interests of

Central and South West's shareholders and customers," Brooks

said.

     Under the merger agreement, Central and South West is

permitted to terminate the agreement if conditions for

completing the merger were not satisfied by June 8, 1995.

The company noted that several of the closing conditions had

not been satisfied and could not be satisfied by December 8,

including receipt of required state and federal regulatory

approvals.

     In a May 23 letter, Central and South West had warned

El Paso Electric that the utility was in breach of the

merger agreement and that it had 10 days to remedy the

breaches, as required under the merger agreement.

     In a June 1 response, El Paso Electric denied that it

had breached the merger agreement and accused Central and

South West of repudiating and breaching the agreement.

     Central and South West said its decision to terminate

voided the merger agreement with El Paso Electric and the

utility's plan of reorganization, which had been confirmed

by the bankruptcy court on December 8, 1993.  The proposed

merger between Central and South West and El Paso Electric

was announced on May 4, 1993.

     Central and South West Corporation is a public utility

holding company based in Dallas.  It owns Central Power and

Light Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma,

Southwestern Electric Power Company and West Texas Utilities

Company.  These four subsidiaries provide electric utility

service to 1.6 million customers in Texas, Oklahoma,

Louisiana and Arkansas.

     Central and South West also owns Transok, Inc., an

Oklahoma intrastate natural gas pipeline company, and

several other subsidiaries.

     El Paso Electric Company is an electric utility serving

approximately 268,000 customers in El Paso, Texas, and an

area of the Rio Grande Valley in West Texas and southern New

Mexico as well as wholesale customers located in Southern

California and Mexico.

     
     
     
     
     
                            # # #
Media contact: Gerald R. Hunter, manager of external communications
for Central and South West Corporation, 214-777-1165.
Financial analyst contact: Sharon R. Peavy, director of investor
relations for Central and South West Corporation, 214-777-1277.




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission