SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
[Amendment No. ___________]
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Sec. 240.14a-11(c) or Sec. 240.14a-12
Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2)
or Item 22(a)(2) or Schedule 14A.
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
<PAGE>
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
AND PROXY STATEMENT
MARCH 5, 1996
March 5, 1996
To the Shareholders of
Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.
The annual meeting of shareholders for 1996 will be held at the Pineville
High School Auditorium at 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on April 19,
1996, at 9 a.m., Pineville time. A notice of annual meeting of shareholders and
proxy statement is enclosed herewith, together with a proxy that may be used by
shareholders who are unable to attend the meeting in person.
The principal items of business to be transacted at the annual meeting are:
(1) the election of directors; and (2) the appointment of independent auditors
of the Company for the year ending December 31, 1996.
The board of directors of the Company recommends election of the nominees
for directors and appointment of the independent auditors, in each case as named
or described in the accompanying proxy statement.
You are cordially invited to attend the meeting. Even if you now expect to
attend the meeting, you are requested to sign, date and return the accompanying
proxy in the enclosed addressed envelope that requires no postage if mailed in
the United States. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person even though
you have mailed in your proxy. Your continued interest and cooperation are
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Gregory L. Nesbitt
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD APRIL 19, 1996
To the Shareholders of
Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of shareholders of Central
Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at the Pineville
High School Auditorium at 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on Friday,
April 19, 1996, at 9 a.m., Pineville time, for the following purposes:
(1) To elect directors;
(2) To consider and act upon a proposal to appoint the firm of
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public
accountants, as auditors of the Company for the year ending
December 31, 1996; and
(3) To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Holders of record of common stock and preferred stock of the Company at the
close of business on February 19, 1996 are entitled to notice of and to vote at
the annual meeting.
The bylaws of the Company require that the holders of shares of capital
stock representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast be represented in
person or by proxy at the meeting in order to constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. Therefore, it is important that your stock be
represented at the meeting.
Please date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the accompanying
envelope.
By order of the board of directors.
Michael P. Prudhomme
Secretary/Treasurer
March 5, 1996
<PAGE>
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
P. O. BOX 5000
PINEVILLE, LOUISIANA 71361-5000
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors of
Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. (the "Company"), to be voted at the
annual meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held at the time and place
and for the purposes set forth in the foregoing notice. In addition to the
original solicitation by mail, certain regular employees of the Company may
solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile or in person, and Morrow & Company, Inc.
("Morrow") has been retained on customary terms to assist in the solicitation of
proxies. The Company estimates that the fees and expenses to be incurred in
connection with Morrow's services will be approximately $10,000. Other than
Morrow, no specially engaged employees or solicitors will be retained to solicit
proxies. All expenses of such solicitation, including the cost of preparing and
mailing this proxy statement and the reimbursement of brokerage firms and other
nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy material to
beneficial owners of the Company's capital stock, will be borne by the Company.
This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy are being mailed to shareholders
beginning on or about March 5, 1996.
All duly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions
thereon. Shareholders who execute proxies, however, retain the right to revoke
them at any time before they are voted. A shareholder who attends the meeting
may vote in person even though such shareholder has mailed in a proxy. A proxy
may be revoked by a proxy bearing a later date. The revocation of a proxy will
not be effective until written notice thereof has been given to the secretary of
the Company, unless the person granting such proxy votes in person.
VOTING OF SECURITIES
As of February 19, 1996, the record date for the determination of
shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting, the Company had outstanding
22,440,634 shares of common stock, par value $2.00 per share ("Common Stock"),
and 369,140 shares of preferred stock, par value $100 per share ("$100 Preferred
Stock"), which are the only classes of stock of the Company outstanding and
entitled to vote at the meeting. Each holder of shares of Common Stock or $100
Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote for each share held, except that at an
election of directors, each holder of shares of Common Stock is entitled to cast
as many votes as equal the number of such holder's shares multiplied by the
number of directors to be elected, and may cumulate all or any part of such
votes for one or more of the nominees.
Under Louisiana law and the Company's articles of incorporation and bylaws,
an abstention from voting on a matter by a shareholder present in person or
represented by proxy at the meeting is not a vote "cast" and is counted neither
"for" nor "against" the matter subject to the abstention. Broker non-votes on
matters are treated as shares as to which voting power has been withheld by the
beneficial holders of those shares and, therefore, as shares not entitled to
vote. Under Louisiana law and the Company's articles of incorporation and
bylaws, a quorum is
determined based upon the number of outstanding shares of capital stock of the
Company entitled to vote on a matter, including shares relating to abstentions.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Company's bylaws provide for the division of the board of directors
into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class consisting,
as nearly as possible, of one-third the number of directors constituting the
whole board. Prior to the 1996 annual meeting of shareholders, the board of
directors will take action pursuant to the bylaws to decrease the number of
directors from ten to nine. The term of each directorship is three years, and
the terms of the three classes are staggered in a manner so that only one class
is elected by the shareholders annually. Those persons who served as directors
of the Company during the past year are named in the Company's 1995 annual
report to shareholders. Three Class II directors are to be elected this year to
serve as members of the board of directors until the annual meeting of
shareholders in 1999, or until their successors are elected and qualified. The
persons named in the accompanying proxy may act with discretionary authority (i)
with respect to cumulative voting of shares of Common Stock and (ii) upon the
unavailability of a nominee for election, although management is unaware of any
circumstances likely to render any of the nominees unavailable for election.
Unless a shareholder specifies otherwise, the persons named in the accompanying
proxy intend to vote in favor of the nominees listed below. The affirmative vote
of a plurality of the total votes cast is required for the election of
directors. All of the nominees currently serve as directors of the Company.
Directors who are members of Classes I and III, who are continuing as directors
at this time and whose terms of office expire in 1998 and 1997, respectively,
are named below on page 3. Mr. William A. Lockwood, who had served as a director
of the Company since 1982, recently retired from the board of directors.
DIRECTORS
The following sets forth information concerning the three nominees for
election as directors at the meeting and the continuing directors, including the
business experience of each during the past five years.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION UNTIL 1999 ANNUAL MEETING
CLASS II DIRECTORS
ROBERT T. RATCLIFF has been chairman, president and chief executive officer
of Ratcliff Construction Company, Inc., a company primarily engaged in the
design and construction of industrial, commercial and governmental facilities,
since 1975. Mr. Ratcliff (age 53) has been a director of the Company since 1993
and is a member of the audit committee of the board of directors. He is also a
director of Hibernia Corporation and Hibernia National Bank.
EDWARD M. SIMMONS is president and chief executive officer of McIlhenny
Company (makers of Tabasco brand products) and has served in such positions for
more than five years. Mr. Simmons (age 67) has been a director of the Company
since 1992, and he previously served on the Company's board of directors during
the period 1971-1981. He is a member of the compensation committee of the board
of directors and also serves as a director of First Commerce Corporation, First
National Bank of Commerce, Pan American Life Insurance Company and Piccadilly
Cafeterias, Inc.
2
ERNEST L. WILLIAMSON is a retired chairman and chief executive officer of
Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, a company primarily engaged in the
exploration for and the development and production of petroleum natural
resources. Before his retirement in 1988, he had served as chairman since 1985
and as chief executive officer since 1984. Mr. Williamson (age 71) became a
director of the Company in 1989 and is a member of the executive committee and
the compensation committee of the board of directors. He is also a director of
Halliburton Company, Hibernia Corporation and Louisiana Land & Exploration
Company.
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
CLASS I DIRECTORS
(TERMS OF OFFICE EXPIRE IN 1998)
SHERIAN G. CADORIA has served as president of Cadoria Speaker and
Consultancy Service since January 1992. She retired in 1990 as Brigadier General
of the United States Army after a 29-year military career. Ms. Cadoria (age 56)
has been a director of the Company since 1993 and is a member of the
compensation committee of the board of directors. She is also a director of
Rapides Bank & Trust Company.
HUGH J. KELLY is a retired president and chief executive officer of Ocean
Drilling & Exploration Company, a company which has offshore drilling operations
and explores for and produces oil and gas. Before his retirement in 1989, he had
served as chief executive officer since 1977 and as president and director since
1974. He is now an oil and gas consultant. Mr. Kelly (age 70) has been a
director of the Company since 1992 and is a member of the audit committee of the
board of directors. He is also a director of Tidewater, Inc., Hibernia National
Bank and Chieftain International, Inc.
GREGORY L. NESBITT has served as chief executive officer of the Company
since 1993 and has served as president since 1992; he had served as chief
operating officer from 1991 to 1993 and as executive vice president from 1988 to
1991. Mr. Nesbitt (age 58) has been a director of the Company since 1988 and is
a member of the executive committee of the board of directors. He joined the
Company in 1980 and served as senior vice president of the Company's electric
power supply group until January 1988.
CLASS III DIRECTORS
(TERMS OF OFFICE EXPIRE IN 1997)
J. PATRICK GARRETT has been president and chief executive officer of
Windsor Food Company Ltd., a privately held company engaged in the food
processing business, since July 1995. Prior to that time, he had been engaged in
the practice of law for more than five years as a member of the law firm of
Baker & Botts, L.L.P., which performed legal services for the Company in 1995
and has been retained to perform such services in 1996. Mr. Garrett (age 52) has
served as a director of the Company since 1981.
F. BEN JAMES, JR. has been president of James Investments, Inc., a company
primarily engaged in real estate development and international marketing, for
more than five years. Mr. James (age 60) has been a director of the Company
since 1986 and is chairman of the audit committee of the board of directors. He
is also a director of First Commerce Corporation.
A. DELOACH MARTIN, JR. has been chairman of Central Engineering & Supply
Company, a company engaged in the wholesale distribution of refrigeration and
mill supplies, for more than five years. Mr. Martin (age 66) became a director
of the Company in 1978 and is chairman of the executive committee and a member
of the audit committee of the board of directors.
3
ORGANIZATION AND COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The board of directors has an executive committee, an audit committee (the
"Audit Committee") and a compensation committee (the "Compensation Committee").
The members of such committees are identified under "Directors." The board of
directors has no standing nominating committee.
The Audit Committee recommends to the board of directors the appointment of
the independent auditors of the Company, reviews the scope of audits, reviews
and recommends to the board of directors financial reporting and accounting
practices, reviews the scope and results of the Company's procedures for
internal auditing and the adequacy of the system of internal accounting control
of the Company, and has responsibility with respect to audit matters generally.
During 1995, the Audit Committee held two meetings.
The Compensation Committee approves, or in some cases recommends to the
board of directors, remuneration arrangements and compensation plans involving
the Company's directors, officers and employees, and administers the granting of
restricted stock and other awards to eligible employees under the Company's
long-term incentive compensation plan and annual incentive compensation program
described below. The Compensation Committee held three meetings in 1995.
The board of directors held four regular meetings and two special meetings
during 1995. At intervals between formal meetings, members of the board are
provided with information regarding the operations of the Company and are
consulted informally from time to time with respect to pending business. During
1995, all directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the
board of directors and of all of the committees of the board of directors on
which such directors served.
The director who is a regularly employed officer of the Company receives no
fees for serving as a director of the Company. Each other director who is not
the chairman of a board committee receives an annual fee of $12,000 for serving
as a director. Each director who is the chairman of a board committee receives
an additional annual fee of $3,000. Each director receives $800 for each day he
or she attends one or more meetings of the board of directors or its committees.
The Company also reimburses directors for travel and related expenses incurred
in attending meetings of the board of directors or such committees. The Company
has in effect a deferred compensation plan for directors under which a director
may elect to defer all or part of his or her compensation as a director. The
Company has a retirement plan for its non-employee directors under which
directors with five years of service receive at age 65 or later retirement an
annual payment equal to the annual board fee in effect at the time of
retirement. Benefits are payable for life or a period equal to the number of
years of service as a director, whichever is shorter. The Company also provides
its non-employee directors $200,000 of life insurance and permanent total
disability coverage under the Company's group accidental death and dismemberment
plan, which covers all active, full-time employees.
4
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock and $100
Preferred Stock beneficially owned as of February 1, 1996 by each director and
nominee, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
below and all directors and executive officers as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP BENEFICIAL
OF COMMON STOCK(1) OWNERSHIP OF
---------------------------------------------- $100 PREFERRED
OPTIONS STOCK(2)
EXERCISABLE --------------------
WITHIN PERCENT PERCENT
DIRECT 60 DAYS OTHER OF CLASS INDIRECT OF CLASS
--------- ------------- ----- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Directors
Sherian G. Cadoria................. 100 * *
J. Patrick Garrett................. 7,719 900 * *
F. Ben James, Jr................... 2,400 * *
Hugh J. Kelly...................... 2,000 * *
A. DeLoach Martin, Jr.............. 19,200 * *
Gregory L. Nesbitt(3).............. 39,736 2,000 * 292 *
Robert T. Ratcliff................. 1,000 * *
Edward M. Simmons.................. 1,213 * *
Ernest L. Williamson............... 1,000 * *
Named Officers
Robert L. Duncan................... 25,846 4,100 * 261 *
David M. Eppler.................... 13,636 5,600 7 * 268 *
Leonard G. Fontenot................ 26,606 * 245 *
David K. Warner.................... 18,050 7,000 * 258 *
All directors and executive officers
as a group (17 persons, including
those listed above)................ 170,301 29,700 907 .92% 1,920 *
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, shares
are deemed to be "beneficially owned" by a person if such person directly or
indirectly has or shares the power to vote or to dispose of the shares,
regardless of whether such person has any economic interest in the shares.
In addition, a person is deemed to own beneficially any shares of which such
person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days, as in
the case of the stock options which are set forth under the "Options
Exercisable Within 60 Days" column. Shares of Common Stock listed under the
"Direct" column are those as to which each named individual or group has
sole voting or dispositive power, including shares held under the Company's
401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (1,241 shares for Mr. Nesbitt, 136 shares
for Mr. Eppler, 42 shares for Mr. Fontenot and 320 shares for other
executive officers included in the amount shown for all directors and
executive officers as a group) and shares granted as restricted stock awards
under the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan described below
(7,813, 2,555, 2,812, 0 and 2,495 shares for Messrs. Nesbitt, Duncan,
Eppler, Fontenot and Warner, respectively, and 4,711 shares for other
executive officers included in the amount shown for all directors and
executive officers
5
as a group). Shares listed under the "Other" column are those as to which
the named individual or group shares voting and dispositive power with
another person.
(2) The shares of $100 Preferred Stock beneficially owned by the individuals and
group indicated in the table are shares held for the respective accounts of
executive officers under the Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan.
(3) Mr. Nesbitt is also the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company.
* Less than 1% of class.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Section
16(a)"), requires the Company's executive officers and directors, and persons
who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity
securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York
Stock Exchange initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership
of the Company's equity securities. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on
review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written
representations that no year-end reports on Form 5 were required, during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, all Section 16(a) filing requirements
applicable to its executive officers, directors and greater-than-10%
shareholders were satisfied, except that one of the Company's executive
officers, Mr. Michael P. Prudhomme, filed a late monthly report covering one
transaction.
6
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
GENERAL
The Summary Compensation Table sets forth individual compensation
information with respect to the chief executive officer and the four other most
highly paid executive officers of the Company for services rendered in all
capacities to the Company during the fiscal years ended December 31, 1995,
December 31, 1994 and December 31, 1993. The table discloses the annual salary,
bonuses and other compensation awards and payouts to the named officers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONG-TERM
COMPENSA-
TION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION PAYOUTS
------------------------------------- ---------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER ALL OTHER
ANNUAL COM-
COMPENSA- LTIP PENSA-
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS(1) TION(2)(3) PAYOUTS(4) TION(5)
- ------------------------------------- --------- ---------- -------- ------------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Gregory L. Nesbitt................... 1995 $269,796 $94,800 $10,546 $146,135 $6,000
President and Chief 1994 242,431 66,000 17,530 54,476 6,000
Executive Officer 1993 208,000 55,000 7,339 93,208 5,996
David M. Eppler...................... 1995 $140,807 $49,956 $ 4,446 $ 72,970 $6,442
Vice President - Power Supply 1994 140,031 25,300 7,012 27,343 6,098
and Energy Transmission 1993 132,687 26,200 3,948 48,138 5,364
Robert L. Duncan..................... 1995 $128,945 $42,268 $ 4,080 $ 69,182 $6,898
Vice President - Customer 1994 124,200 31,900 6,584 30,036 6,843
Operations 1993 125,394 24,800 3,996 50,571 5,793
David K. Warner...................... 1995 $128,307 $42,152 $ 3,950 $ 67,574 $6,442
Vice President - Finance 1994 121,300 31,300 5,487 29,097 6,099
1993 122,000 24,300 3,879 48,740 4,948
Leonard G. Fontenot.................. 1995 $126,326 $43,347 $ 3,858 $ 63,319 $7,546
Former Vice President - Retired 1994 121,446 22,000 5,975 24,695 7,257
effective January 1, 1996 1993 116,222 22,700 3,591 46,793 6,062
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) The "Bonus" column includes cash awards that are payable or have been paid
to executive officers pursuant to an annual incentive compensation program
under which participants may receive incentive compensation in addition to
base compensation determined by the performance of the Company and the
individual participants, and merit lump-sum payments received by certain
named officers.
(2) For 1993, 1994 and 1995, the "Other Annual Compensation" column includes
long-term incentive plan compensation which represents dividends paid on
restricted stock awards. Dividends on restricted stock are paid quarterly
and at the same rate as dividends on the Common Stock. As permitted by the
rules on executive officer compensation disclosure,
7
restricted stock awards granted under the Company's long-term incentive
compensation plan, which are subject to performance-based vesting
requirements, are reported under the "Long-Term Incentive Plan -- Awards in
1995" table below. The number and value of the aggregate restricted stock
holdings at December 31, 1995, a portion of which is included in the "LTIP
Payouts" column, for each of the named executive officers were as follows:
Gregory L. Nesbitt, 7,078 shares with a value of $190,221; David M. Eppler,
2,984 shares with a value of $80,195; Robert L. Duncan, 2,738 shares with a
value of $73,584; David K. Warner, 2,651 shares with a value of $71,246; and
Leonard G. Fontenot, 2,589 shares with a value of $69,579.
(3) For 1994, the "Other Annual Compensation" column includes the amount paid to
the named executive officers as reimbursement for payment of taxes incurred
relating to future benefits accrued in 1994 pursuant to the Company's
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
(4) For 1993, 1994 and 1995, the "LTIP Payouts" column includes the value of
restricted stock and opportunity shares under the Company's long-term
incentive compensation plan vested in 1994 relating to the performance
period January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1993, in 1995 relating to the
performance period January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1994 and in 1996 relating
to the performance period January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1995,
respectively, and related tax gross-up amounts.
(5) For 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively, the "All Other Compensation" column
includes: (i) amounts contributed or accrued by the Company under the
Company's 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan on behalf of the named
executive officers as follows: Gregory L. Nesbitt, $5,996, $6,000 and
$6,000; David M. Eppler, $5,292, $5,999 and $6,000; Robert L. Duncan,
$4,977, $6,000 and $6,000; David K. Warner, $4,876, $6,000 and $6,000; and
Leonard G. Fontenot, $4,598, $5,766 and $6,000; and (ii) term life insurance
premiums paid for the benefit of the named executive officers as follows:
Gregory L. Nesbitt, $0, $0 and $0; David M. Eppler, $72, $99 and $442;
Robert L. Duncan, $816, $843 and $898; David K. Warner, $72, $99 and $442;
and Leonard G. Fontenot, $1,464, $1,491 and $1,546.
STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company currently maintains two plans pursuant to which options to
purchase shares of Common Stock are outstanding or available for future grants.
The Company's 1981 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"),
covering an aggregate of 800,000 shares of Common Stock, expired in 1991 and no
future grants can be made under this plan. As of February 1, 1996, options
covering 29,700 shares remained to be exercised pursuant to grants made under
the Stock Option Plan. The Company has in effect a long-term incentive
compensation plan pursuant to which certain officers and key employees may
receive stock options or stock appreciation rights. This plan is discussed in
greater detail under the section "Long-Term Incentive Plan" below. No stock
options were granted under the long-term incentive compensation plan in 1995.
Although the long-term incentive compensation plan permits grants of stock
appreciation rights, no such rights had been granted as of December 31, 1995.
8
The following table sets forth, for each of the persons listed in the
Summary Compensation Table, certain information concerning stock options
exercised during 1995. The table also discloses information concerning
unexercised stock options held at December 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN 1995 AND 1995 YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES VALUE OF
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
OPTIONS AT OPTIONS AT
SHARES DECEMBER 31, 1995(#) DECEMBER 31, 1995
ACQUIRED ON VALUE -------------------------- -----------------------------
NAME EXERCISE (#) REALIZED(1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE(1) UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------- -------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Gregory L. Nesbitt................... 2,000 $13,190 3,000 0 $30,285 $ 0
David M. Eppler...................... 3,000 26,938 5,600 0 56,532 0
Robert L. Duncan..................... 2,780 20,680 5,600 0 56,532 0
David K. Warner...................... 2,000 18,250 7,000 0 70,665 0
Leonard G. Fontenot.................. 2,400 15,228 0 0 0 0
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange Composite Tape on the exercise date and at year-end, respectively,
minus the exercise price.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company has in effect a long-term incentive compensation plan (the
"Long-Term Plan"), pursuant to which certain officers and key employees may
receive stock incentives and/or cash incentives based on the value of the Common
Stock. Five types of awards may be granted under the Long-Term Plan: (i) stock
awards consisting of restricted stock and "opportunity shares" which may be
awarded in connection with restricted stock awards; (ii) restricted unit awards
consisting of Common Stock equivalent units and "opportunity units" which may be
awarded in connection with restricted unit awards; (iii) nonstatutory stock
options or incentive stock options; (iv) stock appreciation rights attached to
stock options; and (v) stock appreciation rights not attached to stock options.
An aggregate of 800,000 shares of Common Stock, or cash equivalents of Common
Stock, may be issued pursuant to the Long-Term Plan (such number being subject
to antidilution adjustments under certain circumstances). Plan participants,
awards to participants, performance measurement periods and performance goals
are determined by the Compensation Committee. Upon a change of control of the
Company or merger or similar transaction involving the Company, all restrictions
imposed on awards under the Long-Term Plan will lapse, all unvested rights will
vest, and all stock options and similar rights granted under the plan will
become fully exercisable, subject to certain limitations imposed by the
Long-Term Plan.
9
The following table sets forth, for each of the persons listed in the
Summary Compensation Table, information as to long-term incentive plan awards
granted under the Long-Term Plan during 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN -- AWARDS IN 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
(C) ---------------------------------------------
(E) (F)
PERFORMANCE OR (D) NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
(B) OTHER PERIOD UNTIL NUMBER OF TARGET MAXIMUM
(A) NUMBER OF MATURATION OR THRESHOLD SHARES SHARES
NAME SHARES (#)(1) PAYOUT SHARES (#)(2) (#)(2) (#)(3)
- ------------------------------------- ------------- ------------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Gregory L. Nesbitt................... 2,803 1/1/95-12/31/97 701 2,803 4,205
David M. Eppler...................... 911 1/1/95-12/31/97 228 911 1,366
Robert L. Duncan..................... 827 1/1/95-12/31/97 207 827 1,241
David K. Warner...................... 785 1/1/95-12/31/97 196 785 1,177
Leonard G. Fontenot.................. 790 1/1/95-12/31/97 197 790 1,185
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) The amounts under column (B) "Number of Shares" represent the target level
of performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the named executive
officers in 1995, as reflected in column (E) "Number of Target Shares." For
further information concerning these awards and the award of "opportunity
shares" granted in connection with the restricted stock, see the discussion
under footnotes 2 and 3 below.
(2) The amounts under columns (D) "Number of Threshold Shares" and (E) "Number
of Target Shares" represent performance-based restricted stock awards
granted to the named executive officers in 1995 that will vest under the
threshold and target levels established by the Compensation Committee. The
restricted stock awards vest based on total return to shareholders (Common
Stock price appreciation plus dividends paid during performance cycle) in
relation (by percentile) to a peer group of other utilities ("Total Return
to Shareholders"). The vesting (payout) schedule for the restricted stock
awards set forth under these two columns, based on the Company's Total
Return to Shareholders ranking, is as follows:
(a) No awards vest if the Company's ranking is below 25th
percentile.
(b) Threshold performance provides 25% award payout at 25th
percentile.
(c) Target performance provides 100% award payout from 45th
percentile to 55th percentile.
Performance awards above the threshold level and below the target level will
be prorated.
The recipient of a restricted stock award is the record owner of the number
of target shares awarded, which are issued in the name of the recipient but
held in escrow by the Company until delivery to or forfeiture by the
recipient. The recipient may vote the shares covered by the award and
receives dividends with respect thereto, but generally may not sell, pledge
or otherwise transfer such shares until the restriction period imposed by
the Compensation Committee comes to an end and the performance goals
established by the committee have been met. The recipient may, at the end of
the restriction period, forfeit all or a portion of the restricted shares
awarded depending on the performance level achieved. The restriction
10
period for restricted stock awarded during 1995 is three years from the date
of grant (January 1998). The restricted stock awards require an additional
three-year holding period following vesting before any shares may be sold.
(3) The amounts under column (F) "Number of Maximum Shares" represent the number
of performance-based restricted stock awards that vest at the target level
set forth under column (E) "Number of Target Shares" PLUS the number of
performance-based "opportunity shares" granted to the named executive
officers in 1995 that will vest between the target and maximum levels
established by the Compensation Committee. The "opportunity shares" vest
based on Total Return to Shareholders and will be issued when the
restriction period on the associated restricted stock awards lapses. The
vesting (payout) schedule for the "opportunity shares" included in this
column, based on the Company's Total Return to Shareholders ranking, is as
follows:
(a) No awards of "opportunity shares" vest if the Company's
ranking is at or below the 55th percentile.
(b) Maximum performance provides 100% "opportunity share" award
payout (equal to 50% of number of target shares of restricted
stock) at 75th percentile.
Performance awards of "opportunity shares" above the target level and below
the maximum level will be prorated.
"Opportunity shares" awarded in connection with a restricted stock award
will not be issued until the lapse of restrictions on the related restricted
stock and do not entitle the recipient to the rights of a shareholder with
respect to the "opportunity shares" until the time of issuance of the Common
Stock representing the "opportunity shares." Provisions of the "opportunity
share" awards require an additional three-year holding period following
vesting before any of the shares may be sold.
PENSION PLAN
The Company has in effect a pension plan and related trust (the "Pension
Plan"), covering substantially all employees of the Company, under which the
Company makes such contributions as are actuarially necessary to provide for the
retirement benefits established under the plan. Benefits are based on employees'
earnings, length of service, age at retirement, payment form elected,
application of statutory benefit limits, and certain other factors, and are
payable upon normal retirement at age 65, upon early retirement beginning at age
55, or after termination of employment under certain circumstances. Annual
benefits under the Pension Plan are limited to the maximum amount prescribed by
sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the "Code"). For 1996, the annual compensation of each employee which is to be
taken into account under the Pension Plan cannot exceed $150,000, and the
maximum allowable pension benefit for the plan is limited to $120,000. Payments
to retired employees under the Pension Plan are not reduced for Social Security
benefits or other offsetting amounts.
In addition, effective July 1, 1992, the Company established a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP") for the benefit of certain participants
designated by the Compensation Committee. The SERP provides participants who
have completed ten years of service and terminated employment after reaching age
65 with a right to monthly payments for the life of the participant and
surviving spouse equal to 65% of final average compensation, reduced by the
Pension Plan benefit and benefits under other previous employer pension plans.
The SERP also
11
provides adjusted benefits for early retirement on or after age 55 with ten
years of service, for termination of service due to disability, and for
beneficiaries in the event of the death of the participant. Benefits under the
SERP are payable out of the Company's general funds. The SERP participants in
1995 were the five individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table and three
other executive officers of the Company.
Under the Pension Plan, eligible remuneration for purposes of determining
the annual pension benefit payable to a participant upon retirement is based
upon the average of the five consecutive years (of the participant's last ten
years of employment) during which the participant received his or her highest
amount of remuneration from the Company. Under the SERP, eligible remuneration
is based on the sum of the highest annual salary paid during the five years
prior to termination of employment, and the average of the three highest annual
incentive compensation program awards paid to the participant during the
preceding five years. The remuneration covered by the Pension Plan and the SERP
consists of salaries and bonuses paid to Pension Plan and SERP participants,
including the salaries and bonuses set forth in columns (C) and (D) of the
Summary Compensation Table. The estimated annual benefits payable upon
retirement at normal retirement age under the Pension Plan and the SERP for
Messrs. Nesbitt, Eppler, Duncan and Warner would be approximately $224,247,
$121,244, $109,382 and $108,567, respectively. These amounts are based on the
assumption that these executive officers will continue to work for the Company
until their normal retirement age and that their earnings in the five years
prior to such retirement will be the same, respectively, as their earnings
during the past five years. Mr. Fontenot, who retired effective January 1, 1996,
will receive annual benefits under the Pension Plan and the SERP of
approximately $85,000, subject to certain adjustments pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the plans.
LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN
The Company maintains a long-term disability plan that provides disability
benefits up to 60% of salary or a maximum of $7,500 per month for all active
full-time employees with two or more years of service. These benefits are
provided for the first 24 months out of the Company's general funds, and
thereafter pursuant to an insurance contract under which premiums are paid by
the Company.
SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
The Company has severance agreements with Messrs. Nesbitt, Eppler, Duncan
and Warner and three other executive officers of the Company. The agreement for
each such officer provides generally for payment of a minimum annual salary
equal to such executive officer's current annual base salary, participation in
all Company benefit plans and programs applicable to the Company's executive
officers and reimbursement of employment-related expenses incurred while
performing such officer's duties. Under the severance agreements, the base
salaries for 1996 for Messrs. Nesbitt, Eppler, Duncan and Warner are $272,000,
$140,800, $131,000 and $131,000, respectively. The severance agreements had an
initial term of three years ending on July 1, 1995, with continuously renewing
one-year extensions thereafter, unless either the Company or the executive
officer gives notice prior to such extension that such officer's term of
employment will not be extended.
12
The severance agreements include provisions governing reductions in salary
or duties, termination of employment and change in control. Generally, if the
executive's employment is terminated (i) by the Company for any reason other
than a material breach by the executive (as defined in the agreements) or (ii)
by the executive following a reduction in base salary (other than a reduction in
pay uniformly applicable to all officers) or a significant reduction in the
executive's authority, duties or responsibilities, the executive is entitled to
receive, as severance pay, an amount equal to his or her annual base salary at
the time of termination. The executive is also entitled to continued health plan
coverage for up to 18 months after such termination. The executive is also
entitled to require the Company to (i) purchase his or her principal residence
(if it is located within 60 miles of the Company's Pineville office) for an
amount equal to the greater of (x) the purchase price of the residence plus the
cost of capital improvements or (y) the fair market value of the residence, and
(ii) pay or reimburse the executive for relocation costs.
Generally, in the event a change in control occurs and within three years
after such change in control the executive's employment is terminated by the
Company for reasons other than a material breach by the executive (as defined in
the agreements) or the executive terminates his or her employment for good
reason (as defined in the agreements), the Company will pay the executive, in
lieu of any severance obligation otherwise payable under the severance
agreement, an amount equal to three times the executive's average compensation
paid during the five calendar years preceding the change in control. In the
event of a change in control, payments under the agreements for the individuals
named in the Summary Compensation Table (other than for Mr. Fontenot who retired
effective January 1, 1996), using compensation for the years 1991 through 1995,
would be approximately as follows: Mr. Nesbitt, $640,103; Mr. Eppler, $404,306;
Mr. Duncan, $387,905; and Mr. Warner, $374,876. However, the severance
agreements limit the amount payable upon a change in control to an amount that
would not result in the disallowance of a deduction to the Company under the
"golden parachute" provisions of the Code or the imposition of an excise tax on
the employee under Section 4999 of the Code.
The severance agreements also generally require the executives not to
disclose confidential information relating to the Company and, for a period of
one year after termination, not to hire Company officers, employees or agents or
solicit or divert any customer or supplier of the Company.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee (in this report, the "Committee") has prepared
its report of 1995 executive compensation. The Committee, composed entirely of
directors who are not current or former officers or employees of the Company, is
responsible for implementing, or making recommendations to the board of
directors with respect to, the Company's officer compensation programs. The
Committee has retained the services of executive compensation consultants to
provide professional assistance, data and advice regarding pay practices at the
Company. This report describes the basis on which such 1995 compensation
determinations or recommendations were made by the Committee with respect to the
Company's executive officers. This report, required by rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, provides specific information regarding compensation of
the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer
13
(the "Chief Executive Officer") and general information regarding compensation
of the Company's executive officers as a group. The Chief Executive Officer and
four other most highly compensated executive officers are sometimes referred to
as the "Named Executives."
Section 162(m) of the Code limits to $1,000,000 in a taxable year the
deduction publicly held companies may claim for compensation paid to an
executive officer, unless certain requirements are met. The Committee has
reviewed this provision and has determined that the Company is not affected by
Section 162(m) because no compensation paid to any officer currently approaches
or is expected to approach $1,000,000 in the near term. Accordingly, no change
to any of the compensation plans is contemplated at this time.
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
The Company seeks to ensure that executive compensation is directly linked
to corporate performance and shareholder value, as well as comparable pay
practices in the industry. Each year, the Committee, in making compensation
decisions and recommendations, and the board of directors, in approving base
salaries, review the performance of the Company and compare such performance to
specified internal and external performance standards. The Committee has
developed the following compensation guidelines as the principles upon which
compensation decisions and recommendations are made:
Provide variable compensation opportunities that are linked to the
financial performance of the Company and that align executive
compensation with the interests of shareholders.
Provide incentives to increase corporate performance and shareholder
value relative to those of other electric utilities.
Establish executive officer base pay levels at or somewhat below the
competitive market, while providing incentive awards (from the annual
and long-term plans) above the competitive market, provided that
performance objectives are achieved.
Provide a competitive total compensation package that is "at risk"
driven and enables the Company to attract and retain key executives.
COMPENSATION PROGRAM COMPONENTS
The compensation program for executive officers is currently comprised of
base salary, annual performance-related incentives and performance-based awards
of restricted stock and related "opportunity shares" granted under the Long-Term
Plan, as discussed above under "Long-Term Incentive Plan." In addition, certain
of the executive officers have stock options outstanding that were granted under
the Stock Option Plan, which expired in 1991 and under which no future grants
can be made. See "Stock Option Plans." The compensation programs for the
Company's executive officers are further explained below.
BASE SALARY -- Base pay levels recommended by the Committee are largely
determined through comparisons with those of other electric utilities
of similar size and complexity to the Company. These companies, as well
as other electric utilities, are included in the Edison Electric
Institute Index of 100 investor-owned electric utilities (the "Edison
Electric Institute Index") graphed in the performance graph shown
elsewhere. Actual salaries are based on individual performance
contributions within a salary structure that is
14
established through job evaluation and market comparisons. While the
actual relationship may vary from year to year, it is the Company's
policy to have base pay levels for the Company's executive officers,
including the Named Executives, to be at or slightly below the average
of the competitive market. Including 1995 base salary increases, actual
base pay levels for the Company's executive officers, including the
Named Executives, are consistent with this policy. Increases in base
salary for 1995 to continuing executive officers were recommended by
the Committee and approved by the board of directors in January 1995.
In January 1995 the base salaries of all but three of the executive
officers were increased from between 3% to 8%.
Three executive officers, whose base salaries were already at the
average of the competitive market, received merit lump-sum payments in
1995 in lieu of increases in base salary. These merit lump-sum payments
averaged 6% of base salary. In keeping with the Company's executive
compensation philosophy of positioning its base pay at or somewhat
below the market, two other executive officers who received a modest
pay increase also were given merit lump-sum payments which averaged 4%
of base salary. The merit lump-sum payments for 1995 to the executive
officers were recommended by the Committee and approved by the board of
directors in January 1995 and were paid in February 1995 in order to
recognize the individual performance and team contribution of each of
these executive officers.
In July 1995 in anticipation of an impending retirement of one of the
executive officers, changes in responsibilities were implemented
together with selected pay increases. The organizational changes
affected the base pay of three executive officers and included
increases ranging from 2% to 10%.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION -- The Company's executive officers are
eligible to participate in an annual incentive compensation program
with awards generally based on earnings per share goals and the
Company's actual return on equity in relation to that of the Edison
Electric Institute Index, a peer group of approximately 100 electric
utilities. Earnings per share and return on equity goals are generally
of equal weight. Based on actual results, awards from 0% to 150% of
target incentive levels may be made. For 1995, the earnings per share
target was $2.04. The Company's return on equity target was the 50th to
59th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index. The Company's
actual 1995 return on equity performance was in the 60th to 74th
percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index and its primary
earnings per share in 1995 were $2.08. Based on the earnings per share
and return on equity financial performance, the Committee approved
actual awards for 1995 at 114% of target annual bonus levels. The
objective of the annual incentive compensation program is to deliver
competitive levels of compensation (I.E., average award levels
comparable to the Company's competitive peer group) for the attainment
of short-term financial objectives that the Committee believes are
primary determinants of shareholder value over time, and to reinforce
behaviors that contribute to consistent growth of the enterprise. The
Committee bases target annual bonus levels on average competitive bonus
levels among other electric utility companies of similar size and
complexity. These companies are included in the Edison Electric
Institute Index. Targeted awards for executive officers of the Company
under this program range from
15
15% to 32% of base salary. Awards are paid in the first quarter of the
year following the year for which the award is earned. The amounts of
actual awards are further subject to the discretion of the Committee,
within established program guidelines (I.E., the ability of the
Committee to make adjustments to reflect extraordinary items of income
or expense).
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN -- The Committee supports
increased stock ownership by key executives of the Company and favors
awards to key executives of stock and/or cash based on the Company's
stock price appreciation and other measures of performance. The basis
for such position is the Committee's belief that the Company benefits
by providing those persons who have substantial responsibility for the
management and growth of the Company with additional incentives by
increasing their proprietary interest in the success of the Company or
by awarding those persons for increases in the Company's stock price or
the achievement of other long-term performance goals for the Company.
Thus, under the Long-Term Plan, executive officers may be eligible to
receive performance-based grants of restricted stock, related
"opportunity shares," restricted unit grant awards, related
"opportunity units," stock options and stock appreciation rights,
giving them the right to receive or purchase shares of Common Stock
under specified circumstances or to receive cash awards based on the
Company's stock price appreciation or the achievement of
pre-established long-term performance goals. The Committee believes
that such programs are also important as a means of retaining senior
management over the long term. The number of shares of stock and other
awards granted to executive officers under the Long-Term Plan is based
on competitive compensation practices (I.E., compensation practices of
other utilities that constitute the Edison Electric Institute Index).
Grants of restricted stock and awards of related "opportunity shares"
under the Long-Term Plan were made to all executive officers in 1995.
Awards to executive officers are based on a competitive compensation
analysis (I.E., compensation practices of other utilities that
constitute the Edison Electric Institute Index). Awards actually earned
are based on the Company's performance during a three-year performance
cycle compared to the other electric utilities in the Edison Electric
Institute Index over the same period. Grants of restricted stock and
"opportunity shares," for the third performance cycle, under the
Long-Term Plan were made in January 1993; such grants vested in 1995.
Because no base pay increases were given to the executive officers for
1993, as a result of an impending reorganization study, the number of
potential shares under the Long-Term Plan was increased for the third
performance cycle of the Long-Term Plan. For the third three-year
performance cycle which ended December 31, 1995, the Company's total
return to shareholders placed it at the 66th percentile compared to the
Edison Electric Institute Index, thus meeting the objectives, as
specified in the Long-Term Plan, for such performance cycle. Provisions
of the restricted stock and "opportunity share" grants require an
additional three-year holding period following vesting before any
shares may be sold. No other types of awards under the Long-Term Plan
were made to executive officers in 1995.
16
OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company also provides executive officers with certain executive
benefits, such as a supplemental retirement plan and severance agreements. The
Committee considers each of these programs to be reasonably competitive and
appropriate for executive officers of the Company.
1995 COMPENSATION FOR THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
The Committee believes that the role of the Chief Executive Officer is
particularly important in reaching corporate goals and accomplishing
organizational objectives. As such, for fiscal year 1995, the Committee made the
following recommendations or determinations regarding the compensation for Mr.
Nesbitt:
BASE SALARY -- Mr. Nesbitt is President and Chief Executive Officer. His
base salary was increased in January 1995 from $244,300 to $260,000, an
increase of approximately 6%. The amount of this increase was based on
the continued performance of Mr. Nesbitt as evaluated by the Committee.
Even with this adjustment, his base pay is significantly below peers in
the industry.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE -- Mr. Nesbitt was eligible to participate in 1995 in
the Company's annual incentive compensation program discussed in this
report above (see "Annual Incentive Compensation"). The Chief Executive
Officer's 1995 target award was 32% of his base salary. His actual award
for 1995 was 114% of target, or 36.5%.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE -- Awards were made to Mr. Nesbitt under the
Long-Term Plan during 1995. The number of shares of stock and other
awards granted to the Chief Executive Officer under the Long-Term Plan
is based on competitive practices within the industry. Administration is
consistent with the provisions of the plan as described above in
"Long-Term Incentive Plan." For the three-year performance cycle ended
December 31, 1995, the Chief Executive Officer's award was 130% of
target, or 2,991 shares.
SUMMARY
The Compensation Committee believes that base-pay levels and increases, and
performance-based awards, are reasonable and competitive with the compensation
programs provided to officers and other executives by electric utilities of
similar size and complexity to the Company. The Committee believes further that
the degree of performance sensitivity in the annual incentive program continues
to be reasonable, yielding awards that are directly linked to the annual
financial and operational results of the Company. The Long-Term Plan continues
to provide, in the view of the Committee, financial opportunities to
participants and retention features for the Company that are consistent with the
relative returns that are generated on behalf of the Company's shareholders.
The Compensation Committee
William A. Lockwood, Chairman
Sherian G. Cadoria, Brig. General (retired)
Edward M. Simmons
Ernest L. Williamson
17
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following performance graph compares the performance of the Common
Stock to the S&P 500 Index and to the Edison Electric Institute Index (which
includes the Company) for the Company's last five fiscal years. The graph
assumes that the value of the investment in the Common Stock and each index was
$100 at December 31, 1990 and that all dividends were reinvested.
[LINEAR GRAPH CREATED FROM PLOT POINTS BELOW]
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DECEMBER 31, 1990 IN CLECO COMMON STOCK, S&P 500 INDEX
AND EEI INDEX.
DECEMBER 31,
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
CLECO $100 $145 $151 $164 $163 $201
S&P 500 Index $100 $130 $140 $155 $157 $215
EEI Index(1) $100 $129 $139 $154 $136 $179
(1) The Edison Electric Institute Index is comprised of: Allegheny Power System,
Inc.; American Electric Power Co., Inc.; Atlantic Energy, Inc.; Baltimore
Gas & Electric Company; Bangor Hydro-Electric Company; Black Hills
Corporation; Boston Edison Company; Carolina Power & Light Company;
Centerior Energy Corporation; Central & South West Corporation; Central
Hudson Gas & Electric; Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.; Central
Maine
18
Power Company; Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Cilcorp Inc.;
CINergy Corp; Cipsco Inc.; CMS Energy Corp.; Commonwealth Energy System;
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.; Delmarva Power & Light Co.;
Dominion Resources, Inc.; DPL Inc.; DQE Inc.; DTE Energy Co. (newly formed
holding company of Detroit Edison Company); Duke Power Company; Eastern
Utilities Associates; El Paso Electrical Company; Empire District Electric
Company; Enova Corp. (holding company of San Diego Gas & Electric Co.);
Entergy Corporation; ESELCO Inc.; Florida Progress Corporation; FPL Group,
Inc.; General Public Utilities Corporation; Green Mountain Power
Corporation; Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.; Houston Industries
Incorporated; Idaho Power Company; IES Industries, Inc.; Illinova Corp.;
Interstate Power Co.; IPALCO Enterprises Inc.; Kansas City Power & Light
Company; KU Energy Corp.; LG&E Energy Corp.; Long Island Lighting Company;
Madison Gas & Electric Co.; Maine Public Service Company; MidAmerican Energy
Co. (formed by the merger of Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. and Midwest
Resources Inc.); Minnesota Power & Light Co.; Montana Power Co.; Nevada
Power Company; New England Electric System; New York State Electric & Gas
Corporation; Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.; NIPSCO Industries, Inc.; Northeast
Utilities; Northern States Power Co.; Northwestern Public Service Co.; Ohio
Edison Company; Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company; Orange & Rockland
Utilities, Inc.; Otter Tail Power Company; Pacific Gas & Electric Co.;
Pacificorp; Peco Energy Co.; Pinnacle West Capital Corp.; Portland General
Corporation; Potomac Electric Power Corporation; PP&L Resources Inc. (newly
formed holding company of Pennsylvania Power & Light Company); Public
Service Co. of Colorado; Public Service Company of New Mexico; Public
Service Enterprise Group, Incorporated; Puget Sound Power & Light Company;
Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation; SCANA Corp.; SCECORP; Sierra Pacific
Resources; Southern Company; Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.;
Southwestern Public Service Company; St. Joseph Light & Power Co.; TECO
Energy, Inc.; Texas Utilities Company; TNP Enterprises, Inc.; Tucson
Electric Power Company; Unicom Corp.; Union Electric Co.; United
Illuminating Company; Unitil Corp.; Upper Peninsula Energy Corp.; Utilicorp
United Inc.; Washington Water Power Co.; Western Resources, Inc.; Wisconsin
Energy Corporation; WPL Holdings Inc.; and WPS Resources Corp.
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
The firm of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public
accountants, has served as auditors for the Company continuously since 1952. The
board of directors, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, proposes to
continue such firm's services as auditors for the Company for the year ending
December 31, 1996. Neither such firm nor any of its associates has any
relationship with the Company except in their capacity as auditors. The persons
named in the accompanying proxy will vote in accordance with the choice
specified thereon, or, if no choice is properly indicated, in favor of the
appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as auditors of the Company.
A representative of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. is expected to attend the
annual meeting. If present, the representative will have an opportunity to make
a statement during the meeting if he or she so desires and will respond to
appropriate questions raised during the meeting.
19
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth, to the knowledge of the Company based on a
review of the information and as of the dates indicated, certain information
with respect to each person who is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of any class of the Company's voting securities.
SHARES OF
$100 PREFERRED STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
------------------------
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL PERCENTAGE
NAME AND ADDRESS OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
- ------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
State Street Bank and Trust Company,
Trustee of the ESOP Trust
225 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110................... 294,899(1) 79.9%
- ------------
(1) As of December 31, 1995, based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Reporting entity states that it has shared
dispositive power with respect to 294,899 shares and shared voting power
with respect to 294,899 shares. Such 294,899 shares are held by State Street
Bank and Trust Company as the ESOP trustee ("ESOP Trustee") under the ESOP
trust ("ESOP Trust") established pursuant to the Company's 401(k) Savings
and Investment Plan ("Savings Plan"). Such 294,899 shares are convertible
under certain circumstances pursuant to the Company's Restated Articles of
Incorporation and the governing instruments of the ESOP Trust and the
Savings Plan into 1,415,517 shares of Common Stock, subject to antidilution
adjustment, or approximately 6.3% of the Common Stock outstanding as of
December 31, 1995. Participants in the Savings Plan have voting rights with
respect to $100 Preferred Stock (or Common Stock into which such stock has
been converted) allocated to their accounts. The ESOP Trustee is required to
vote unallocated shares in the same proportion as allocated shares as to
which it has received voting instructions from participants. Participants in
the Savings Plan have, in the event of a tender or exchange offer,
investment discretion with respect to shares of $100 Preferred Stock (or
Common Stock into which such stock has been converted) allocated to their
accounts. In such an event, the ESOP Trustee is required to tender
unallocated shares in the same proportion that it tenders allocated shares
as to which it has received investment instructions, but has no power to
tender allocated shares as to which it has received no investment
instructions. Reporting entity also states that it, as trustee of various
collective investor funds for employee benefit plans and other index
accounts and various personal trust accounts, has sole voting power with
respect to 77,124 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power with respect
to 2,931 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to
75,360 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power with respect to
5,495 shares of Common Stock.
ANNUAL REPORT
The 1995 annual report to shareholders, including financial statements as
of and for the year ended December 31, 1995, is concurrently being mailed to
shareholders. No part of the 1995 annual report to shareholders is to be deemed
to be a part of the proxy solicitation material.
20
PROPOSALS BY SHAREHOLDERS
Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the Company's annual
meeting of shareholders to be held in 1997, and otherwise eligible, must be
received by the Company (at the address indicated on the first page of this
proxy statement) no later than November 6, 1996 (subject to certain provisions
of the Company's bylaws which require that certain proposals be submitted 180
days before such meeting) to be included in the Company's proxy material and
form of proxy relating to such meeting.
OTHER MATTERS
Management does not intend to bring any other matters before the meeting
and has not been informed that any other matters are to be presented to the
meeting by others. If other matters properly come before the meeting or any
adjournments thereof, the persons named in the accompanying proxy and acting
thereunder intend to vote in accordance with their best judgment.
ALL SHARES THAT A SHAREHOLDER OWNS, NO MATTER HOW FEW, SHOULD BE
REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY SHOULD
THEREFORE BE COMPLETED, SIGNED, DATED AND RETURNED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
By order of the board of directors.
Gregory L. Nesbitt
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 5, 1996
21
<PAGE>
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING ON APRIL 19, 1996
VOTING DIRECTION TO CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 401(K)
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN TRUSTEES
As a participant in the Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. 401(k)
Savings and Investment Plan, I hereby direct Merrill Lynch Trust Company,
Trustee, to vote those shares of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.
Common Stock and State Street Bank and Trust Company, Trustee, to vote
those shares of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. Convertible
Preferred Stock allocated to my account as follows at the annual meeting of
shareholders of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., to be held at the
Pineville High School Auditorium, 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana,
on Friday, April 19, 1996, and at any adjournments thereof, on all matters
coming before said meeting. Receipt of the notice of the meeting and the
proxy statement, both dated March 5, 1996, is acknowledged. The following
items of business will be considered at the aforesaid annual meeting: 1.
Election of three Class II Directors. Nominees:
Robert T. Ratcliff, Edward M. Simmons and Ernest L. Williamson,
whose terms of office expire in 1999.
2. Proposal to approve appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as auditors.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES
(SEE REVERSE SIDE) BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS. THE TRUSTEE CANNOT
VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD.
Please mark your
[X] votes as in this
example. 1628
This direction card when executed will be voted in the manner directed herein.
IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS DIRECTION CARD WILL BE VOTED
"FOR" ITEMS 1 AND 2.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL PROPOSALS.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. ELECTION OF [ ] [ ] 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE [ ] [ ] [ ]
DIRECTORS. APPOINTMENT OF COOPERS &
(SEE REVERSE) LYBRAND L.L.P. AS AUDITORS.
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- --------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor,
trustee or guardian, please give full
title as such.
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
<PAGE>
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
P FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING ON APRIL 19, 1996
R The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Gregory L. Nesbitt,
David K. Warner and Michael P. Prudhomme, and each of them (the
O "Proxy Committee"), his or her true and lawful agents
and proxies, with full power of substitution in each, to represent
X the undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Central
Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., to be held at the Pineville High
Y School Auditorium, 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on Friday,
April 19, 1996, and at any adjournments thereof, on all matters coming
before said meeting. Receipt of the notice of the meeting and the
proxy statement, both dated March 5, 1996, is acknowledged. The
following items of business will be considered at the aforesaid annual
meeting:
1. Election of three Class II Directors. Nominees:
Robert T. Ratcliff, Edward M. Simmons and Ernest L. Williamson,
whose terms of office expire in 1999.
2. Proposal to approve appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. as
auditors. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE
APPROPRIATE BOXES (SEE REVERSE SIDE) BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES
IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS'
RECOMMENDATIONS. THE PROXY COMMITTEE CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS
YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD. ACTION TAKEN PURSUANT TO THIS PROXY
CARD WILL BE EFFECTIVE AS TO ALL THE SHARES (WHETHER COMMON OR
PREFERRED, AND, IF PREFERRED, OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES) THAT YOU OWN.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please mark your
[X] votes as in this
example. 1628
This proxy when executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. IF NO
DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" ITEMS 1 AND 2.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL PROPOSALS.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. ELECTION OF [ ] [ ] 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE [ ] [ ] [ ]
DIRECTORS. APPOINTMENT OF COOPERS &
(SEE REVERSE) LYBRAND L.L.P. AS AUDITORS.
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- --------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as attorney, executor,
trustee or guardian, please give full
title as such.
-------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
<PAGE>
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING ON APRIL 19, 1996
P The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Gregory L. Nesbitt,
David K. Warner and Michael P. Prudhomme, and each of them (the
R "Proxy Committee"), his or her true and lawful agents and proxies,
with full power of substitution in each, to represent the
O undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Central
Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., to be held at the Pineville High
X School Auditorium, 1511 Line Street, Pineville, Louisiana, on
Friday, April 19, 1996, and at any adjournments thereof, on all
Y matters coming before said meeting. Receipt of the notice of the
meeting and the proxy statement, both dated March 5, 1996, is
acknowledged. The following items of business will be considered at
the aforesaid annual meeting:
1. Election of three Class II Directors. Nominees:
Robert T. Ratcliff, Edward M. Simmons and Ernest L. Williamson,
whose terms of office expire in 1999.
2. Proposal to approve appointment of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
as auditors.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE
BOXES (SEE REVERSE SIDE) BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH
TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS.
THE PROXY COMMITTEE CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN
THIS CARD. ACTION TAKEN PURSUANT TO THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE EFFECTIVE
AS TO ALL THE SHARES (WHETHER COMMON OR PREFERRED, AND, IF PREFERRED,
OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES) THAT YOU OWN.
Please mark your
[X] votes as in this
example. 1628
This proxy when executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. IF NO
DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" ITEMS 1 AND 2.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL PROPOSALS.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. ELECTION OF[ ] [ ] 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE [ ] [ ] [ ]
DIRECTORS. APPOINTMENT OF COOPERS &
(SEE REVERSE) LYBRAND L.L.P. AS AUDITORS.
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
- ------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each
sign. When signing as attorney,
executor, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such.
-----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
