GOLD KIST INC
424B3, 1996-09-24
POULTRY SLAUGHTERING AND PROCESSING
Previous: CRAIG CORP, 8-K, 1996-09-24
Next: OPPENHEIMER TAX FREE BOND FUND, NSAR-BT, 1996-09-24



   
           SUPPLEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 TO THE
                PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 24, 1995



In January 1993, certain Alabama member patrons of the
Association filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Jefferson
County, Alabama, Tenth Judicial Circuit, against the
Association and Golden Poultry and certain directors and
officers of the companies.  (Ronald Pete Windham and Windham
Enterprises, Inc. on their behalf and on behalf of and for the
use and benefit of Gold Kist, Inc. and its
shareholders/members v. Harold O. Chitwood, individually in
his capacity as an officer of Gold Kist and a Director of
Golden Poultry; et al).  The lawsuit alleged that the named
defendants violated their fiduciary duties by diverting
corporate opportunities from the Association to Golden Poultry
and Carolina Golden Products Company in connection with the
creation of Golden Poultry and Carolina Golden Products
Company and by permitting their continued operations.  In
March 1994, the Court certified the Windham litigation as a
class action.  In September 1995, Golden Poultry and Carolina
Golden Products Company were dismissed from the litigation. 
On October 25, 1995, the jury in the Windham case returned
verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs in the litigation.  On
July 2, 1996, the Jefferson County, Alabama Circuit Court
Judge entered a memorandum opinion and non-final judgment in
the case directing Gold Kist to acquire the approximately 27%
of Golden Poultry shares currently owned by investors so that
all of the issued and outstanding stock of Golden Poultry
becomes owned by Gold Kist or a wholly owned subsidiary,
either through a merger or a tender offer for the minority
shares of Golden Poultry stock outstanding.  The Court denied
the plaintiffs' demands for additional allocations and cash
distributions to the class members.  Upon motions for 
reconsideration filed by both parties to the action, the 
Court modified its memorandum opinion in a Final Judgment and 
Decree entered upon September 13, 1996, under which Gold Kist
was relieved of the Court's requirement to acquire all of the 
shares of Golden Poultry common stock not owned
by Gold Kist and was directed to acquire only that Golden 
Poultry stock held by any current officers or directors of 
Gold Kist and their spouses and minor children.  The Court 
also ordered Gold Kist to cause the surrender of all Golden 
Poultry stock options held by Gold Kist officers and directors 
or the exercise of such options and purchase by Gold Kist of 
the resultant stock, to redeem from eligible members 
approximately $21.2 million of notified equity of Gold Kist, 
to pay $4.2 million in attorney's fees to the plaintiffs
attorneys and to establish a policy prohibiting officers
and directors of Gold Kist from future ownership of Golden 
Poultry stock. An appeal of the Final Judgment may be filed 
on or before October 25, 1996, and could have the effect of 
staying the Final Judgment pending the outcome of any appeal.


[7123/S-1-A-1]



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission