GOLD KIST INC
424B3, 1996-05-15
POULTRY SLAUGHTERING AND PROCESSING
Previous: CARLYLE REAL ESTATE LTD PARTNERSHIP VII, 10-Q, 1996-05-15
Next: GRUBB & ELLIS CO, 10-Q, 1996-05-15



                 SUPPLEMENT DATED MAY 16, 1996 TO THE 
                   PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 24, 1995
   
   
   In January 1993, certain Alabama member patrons of the
   Association filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Jefferson
   County, Alabama, Tenth Judicial Circuit, against the
   Association and Golden Poultry and certain directors and
   officers of the companies.  (Ronald Pete Windham and Windham
   Enterprises, Inc. on their behalf and on behalf of and for the
   use and benefit of Gold Kist, Inc. and its
   shareholders/members v. Harold O. Chitwood, individually in
   his capacity as an officer of Gold Kist and a Director of
   Golden Poultry; et al).  The lawsuit alleges that the named
   defendants violated their fiduciary duties by diverting
   corporate opportunities from the Association to Golden Poultry
   and Carolina Golden Products Company in connection with the
   creation of Golden Poultry and Carolina Golden Products
   Company and by permitting their continued operations.  In
   March 1994, the Court certified the Windham litigation as a
   class action.  In September 1995, Golden Poultry and Carolina
   Golden Products Company were dismissed from the litigation. 
   On October 25, 1995, the jury in the Windham case returned
   verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs in the litigation. 
   Injunctive or equitable remedies will be determined at a later
   date by the Jefferson County, Alabama Circuit Court judge. 
   Among the remedies requested are the purchase of the minority
   interest in Golden Poultry common stock and the subsequent
   merger of Golden Poultry into the Association, and additional
   allocations and distributions of approximately $134.2 million
   to the class members, plus substantial attorneys' fees.  After
   the Court has rendered its final judgment, Gold Kist will
   consider an appeal.


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission