<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant /X/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/X/ Preliminary Proxy Statement / / Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
/ / Definitive Proxy Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec. 240.14a-11(c) or sec. 240.14a-12
United Companies Financial Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(i)(2)
or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
/ / $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was determined):
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
[LOGO]
UNITED COMPANIES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 1591
BATON ROUGE, LA 70821
To the Shareholders of
UNITED COMPANIES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Enclosed is a Notice of the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of United
Companies Financial Corporation, a Louisiana corporation (the "Company"), and a
Proxy and Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting
will be held on June 14, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. at One United Plaza, Fifth Floor,
4041 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The Proxy Statement describes the
matters to be acted upon at the meeting.
You are urged to sign and return the accompanying Proxy so that you may be
sure that your shares will be voted.
Sincerely,
J. TERRELL BROWN
President and Chief Executive Officer
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
May 1, 1995
<PAGE> 3
NOTICE OF 1995 ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS OF
UNITED COMPANIES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
TO THE HOLDERS OF THE COMMON STOCK:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of United
Companies Financial Corporation, a Louisiana corporation (the "Company"), will
be held at One United Plaza, Fifth Floor, 4041 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, on June 14, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. to consider and act upon:
(1) the election of the Board of Directors of eleven members;
(2) a proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation of the Company to
require the affirmative vote of the holders of no less than 80% of
the total voting power of the Company to amend, alter or repeal
certain amended provisions of the by-laws of the Company adopted by
the Board of Directors on and effective as of January 31, 1995, which
amended by-laws:
(a) authorize the Board of Directors exclusively to fix the number of
directors by no less than a 66 2/3% vote and classify the Board
of Directors into three classes with staggered terms;
(b) provide procedures for removal of directors and filling vacancies
on the Board of Directors;
(c) provide advance notice procedures for shareholder nominations and
proposals; and
(d) provide procedures for the calling of a special meeting of the
shareholders;
(3) a proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation of the Company to:
(a) provide that no action may be taken by the shareholders except at
an annual or special meeting;
(b) provide that a special meeting of the shareholders may be called
by the shareholders only by no less than 66 2/3% of the total
voting power of the Company; and
(c) eliminate the right of a director to vote by proxy;
(4) a proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan;
(5) a proposal to approve an amendment to the Company's Management
Incentive Plan;
(6) such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournment thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 17, 1995,
as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, the meeting.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SHERRY E. ANDERSON,
Secretary
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
May 1, 1995
IMPORTANT
TO ASSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR WISHES, DATE,
SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY FOR WHICH A RETURN ENVELOPE IS
PROVIDED.
<PAGE> 4
UNITED COMPANIES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
P. O. BOX 1591 -- 4041 ESSEN LANE
BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70821
PROXY STATEMENT
The accompanying Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of
United Companies Financial Corporation, a Louisiana corporation (the "Company"),
for use at the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday, June
14, 1995, at 9:00 a.m., at One United Plaza, Fifth Floor, 4041 Essen Lane, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana, and any postponements or adjournments thereof. This Proxy
Statement is being furnished in connection with the 1995 Annual Meeting. The
Company anticipates that this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Proxy will be
first sent or given to shareholders on approximately May 1, 1995.
On March 31, 1995, the Company had issued and outstanding and entitled to
vote 13,884,949 shares of its $2.00 par value common stock (the "Common Stock").
The Common Stock is the only outstanding class of voting security of the Company
and each share is entitled to one vote. There is no cumulative voting. Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 1995, will be
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, this Annual Meeting. Any shareholder
giving a Proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by
providing written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company or by
filing a Proxy of a later date with the Secretary of the Company. The holders of
a majority of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date,
whether present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for
the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. The shares held by each
shareholder who signs and returns the enclosed form of Proxy will be counted for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting, whether or not
the shareholder abstains on all or any matter to be acted on at the meeting.
Abstentions are counted toward the calculation of a quorum. Any unvoted position
in a brokerage account will be considered as not voted and will not be counted
toward fulfillment of quorum requirements.
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to consider and act upon the matters
which are listed in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and set forth in
this Proxy Statement. The enclosed form of Proxy provides a means for a
shareholder to vote for all of the matters listed in the accompanying Notice of
Annual Meeting and described in this Proxy Statement. The enclosed form of Proxy
also provides a means for a shareholder to vote for all the nominees for
director listed thereon or to withhold authority to vote for one or more of such
nominees. The Company's by-laws provide that directors are elected by a
plurality of the votes cast. Accordingly, the withholding of authority by a
shareholder will have no effect on the results of the election of those
directors for whom authority to vote is withheld. The accompanying form of Proxy
also provides a means for a shareholder to vote for, against or abstain from
voting on each of the other matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. Each
Proxy will be voted in accordance with the shareholder's directions.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in
person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is
required for Proposals 2 through 5 set forth in the accompanying Notice of
Annual Meeting. Approval of any other matters as may properly come before the
meeting will also require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at
the meeting. Abstentions with respect to Proposals 2 through 5 will have the
same effect as a vote against these Proposals.
Unless the shareholder specifies otherwise, a Proxy in the accompanying
form which is properly executed and duly returned will be voted FOR the election
of the eleven nominees listed hereinafter as directors for the respective terms
as specified herein and FOR Proposals 2 through 5 set forth in the accompanying
Notice of Annual Meeting.
The cost of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this Proxy
Statement, the form of Proxy, and the Notice of 1995 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders will be paid by the Company. In addition to solicitation by use of
the mails, solicitation of Proxies may also be made personally by certain
directors, officers and employees of the Company, and no additional compensation
will be paid to such individuals. In addition, the
2
<PAGE> 5
Company has retained Morrow & Co., New York, N.Y., to aid in the solicitation of
proxies for a fee of $10,000 plus disbursements. The Company will also supply
brokers or persons holding stock in their names or in the names of their
nominees with such number of Proxies, proxy material and annual reports as they
may require for mailing to beneficial owners, and will reimburse them for their
reasonable expenses incurred in connection therewith.
SECURITY HOLDINGS OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
The following table sets forth the amount and percent of shares of Common
Stock which, as of March 31, 1995, are deemed under the rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") to be "beneficially owned" by each director
and nominee for director of the Company, by each executive officer of the
Company, by all directors, nominees, and executive officers of the Company as a
group, and by any person or "group" (as that term is used in the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) known to the Company as of that date to be a
"beneficial owner" of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of
the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL PERCENTAGE
DIRECTORS, NOMINEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OWNERSHIP(1)(2) OF CLASS(3)
------------------------------------------------------ --------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
James J. Bailey, III.................................. 83,830(4)(5) --
General Robert H. Barrow (retired).................... 26,637(4) --
J. Terrell Brown...................................... 469,956(5)(6)(7) 3.351%
Richard A. Campbell................................... 86,154(4) --
Harris J. Chustz...................................... 237,950(5)(6) 1.705%
Harris J. Chustz, Jr.................................. 58,901(5) --
W. Roger Clark........................................ 73,758(6)(7) --
John D. Dienes........................................ 45,155(6)(7) --
Roy G. Kadair, M.D.................................... 4,000 --
Robert D. Kilpatrick.................................. 31,669(4) --
O. Miles Pollard, Jr.................................. 32,450(4) --
Charles Prosser, M.D.................................. 131,567(4)(5) --
Dale E. Redman........................................ 108,126(6)(7) --
Robert B. Thomas, Jr.................................. 28,315(6)(7) --
William H. Wright, Jr................................. 220,778(4)(5) 1.587%
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a
group (15 persons).................................. 1,639,246 11.327%
OTHER PERSONS
------------------------------------------------------
United Companies Financial Corporation
Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust
440 Riverside Mall
Baton Rouge, LA 70801............................... 2,441,693(8) 17.585%
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Under rules promulgated by the SEC, "beneficial ownership" includes having
or sharing with others the power to vote or direct the investment of
securities. Accordingly, a person having or sharing the power to vote or
direct the investment of securities is deemed to "beneficially own" the
securities even if he has no right to receive any part of the dividends on
or the proceeds from the sale of these securities. Also, because
"beneficial ownership" extends to persons, such as co-trustees under a
trust, who share power to vote or control the disposition of the
securities, the very same securities may be deemed "beneficially owned" by
two or more persons shown in the table. Information with respect to
"beneficial ownership" shown in the table above is based upon information
supplied by the directors, nominees and executive officers of the Company
and filings made with the SEC or furnished to the Company by any
shareholder.
3
<PAGE> 6
(2) Includes pro rata shares, where applicable, that have been allocated to an
individual's account in the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan and
Trust (the "ESOP") and in the Company's Employees' Savings Plan and Trust
(the "401(k) Plan").
(3) Less than 1% except as otherwise indicated.
(4) Includes shares which the named holder as of March 31, 1995, was entitled to
acquire upon the exercise of options granted (whether or not such options
are vested) under the Company's 1993 and 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plans.
(5) Includes shares held by family members and controlled affiliates.
(6) Includes shares which the following named holders as of March 31, 1995, were
entitled to acquire upon exercise of options granted (whether or not such
options are vested) under the Company's stock option plans for employees :
Mr. Brown, 131,912; Mr. Chustz, 71,137; Mr. Clark, 56,530; Mr. Dienes,
27,499; Mr. Redman, 73,744; and Mr. Thomas, 22,000; all executive officers
as a group (6 persons), 382,822; and all directors, executive officers and
senior vice presidents as a group (27 persons), 659,389.
(7) Includes shares of restricted stock awarded to the named holder under a
proposed amendment to the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, which
amendment and the related awards are contingent upon shareholder approval
at the 1995 Annual Meeting.
(8) Held by Hibernia National Bank as trustee. An ESOP participant exercises
voting rights over shares of Common Stock allocated to the participant's
account, whether or not vested. Voting rights for any unallocated shares of
Common Stock held by the ESOP are voted by the trustee in proportion to the
voting of allocated shares by the ESOP participants. At March 31, 1995,
there were 410,250 unallocated shares held by the ESOP. The Plan
Administrator, a committee composed of five officers and directors of the
Company, may, in certain circumstances, direct the trustee to purchase,
sell, resell or otherwise dispose of Common Stock.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The number of directors to be elected at the 1995 Annual Meeting to
constitute the Board of Directors has been fixed at eleven. In accordance with
Section 4.1 of the by-laws of the Company, as amended by the Board of Directors
on and effective as of January 31, 1995, beginning with the 1995 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders, the Board of Directors of the Company has divided the Board of
Directors into three classes that are equal or nearly equal in number to each
other. Section 4.1 of the by-laws provides that the three classes shall have
terms expiring at the 1996, 1997 and 1998 Annual Meetings. The three classes and
the nominees assigned to each class by the Board are set out below. At each
Annual Meeting following the 1995 Annual Meeting, the successors of the class of
directors whose term expires shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring
at the Annual Meeting held in the third year following the year of their
election. Each of the nominees, with the exception of Messrs. Chustz, Jr. and
Dienes and Dr. Kadair, is at present a director of the Company. Mr. Chustz and
Dr. Prosser are not standing for reelection to the Board. The enclosed form of
Proxy confers discretionary authority with respect to the election of directors,
but no authority under the Proxy will be exercised to vote for the election of
any person as a director, other than the persons named in this Proxy Statement
who have been nominated by the present Board of Directors, unless, for some
reason not presently known, one or more of such nominees should become
unavailable. In such event, it is intended that the Proxy would be voted for a
substitute nominee or nominees who would be designated by the Board of Directors
prior to the Annual Meeting. In order to be elected a director, a nominee must
receive a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of Common Stock. The name
and age, principal occupation or employment, and other data regarding each
nominee, based on information received from the respective nominees, are set
forth below:
NOMINEES TO SERVE UNTIL THE 1998 ANNUAL MEETING
JAMES J. BAILEY, III
Mr. Bailey, age 53, has served as a director of the Company since 1987. Mr.
Bailey is managing partner of Bailey Family Investments and Chairman of Tri-Star
Investments, and he is a member of the Board of
4
<PAGE> 7
Directors of First Commerce Corporation, City National Bank of Baton Rouge and
St. Mary Bank and Trust, Franklin, Louisiana.
J. TERRELL BROWN
Mr. Brown, age 55, is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Chief Executive Officer of each of the subsidiaries of the Company. He has
served as a director and executive officer since 1972 and was named Chief
Executive Officer in 1985. Mr. Brown is also a director of Hibernia Corporation.
RICHARD A. CAMPBELL
Mr. Campbell, age 63, has served as a director of the Company since 1987.
Mr. Campbell is an oil and gas exploration geologist in Lafayette, Louisiana.
ROBERT D. KILPATRICK
Mr. Kilpatrick, age 71, has served as a director of the Company since 1989.
Mr. Kilpatrick serves as a director of Kuhlman Corporation and is an advisory
director of Boardroom Consultants, Inc. Prior to retirement in 1989, Mr.
Kilpatrick served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CIGNA
Corporation and served as a director of CIGNA Corporation until 1994.
NOMINEES TO SERVE UNTIL THE 1997 ANNUAL MEETING
HARRIS J. CHUSTZ, JR.
Mr. Chustz, age 44, has served as the Manager of Finance and Accounting
with Florida Keys Electric Cooperative and has held this position since 1976.
Mr. Chustz is the son of the Company's Chairman of the Board, Harris J. Chustz,
who is not standing for reelection.
ROY G. KADAIR, M.D.
Dr. Kadair, age 49, is a practicing physician (Internal Medicine) and has
been associated with the Baton Rouge Clinic for over 17 years. He is a director
and member of the executive committee of General Health System, and serves on
the board of directors of Baton Rouge General Hospital and Gulf South Health
Plan.
DALE E. REDMAN
Mr. Redman, age 47, is Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer
and Assistant Secretary of the Company and Vice Chairman of each of the
subsidiaries of the Company. Prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer
and Executive Vice President in 1988, Mr. Redman served as Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company. He has served as a director since 1983.
WILLIAM H. WRIGHT, JR.
Mr. Wright, age 68, has served as a director of the Company since 1972. He
serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Wright Insurance
Agency, Inc. and is a director of City National Bank of Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
NOMINEES TO SERVE UNTIL THE 1996 ANNUAL MEETING
ROBERT H. BARROW, GENERAL (RETIRED)
General Barrow, age 73, has served as a director of the Company since 1983.
He retired as Commandant of the United States Marine Corps in July, 1983.
General Barrow is a member of the Board of Advisors, Baton Rouge Region, Premier
Bank, National Association.
5
<PAGE> 8
JOHN D. DIENES
Mr. Dienes, age 53, serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company and President of United Companies Lending Group, Inc.
("UCLG"), Southern Mortgage Acquisition, Inc., Ginger Mae(R), Inc and UNICOR
Mortgage(R), Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. At the time Mr.
Dienes joined the Company in February 1994, he had over 30 years of experience
in the financial industry. Prior to his employment with the Company, Mr. Dienes
served as Executive Vice President and Director of Western Corporate Banking for
NationsBank Corporation, Dallas, Texas.
O. MILES POLLARD, JR.
Mr. Pollard, age 57, has served as a director of the Company since 1990. He
is engaged in private investments and serves as President of Cadogan Properties,
Inc. and Secretary of Randall Management Services, Inc. He is a director of
First Commerce Corporation, City National Bank of Baton Rouge and Coca-Cola
Bottling Company West, Inc.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the above nominees for
director.
BOARD MEETINGS, COMMITTEES AND COMPENSATION
During the year ended December 31, 1994, six meetings of the Board of
Directors were held. Each incumbent director who is a nominee for reelection
attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board of Directors
and committees of the Board held during the period for which he was a director
or a member of a particular committee. The following Directors presently serve
on the Audit Committee: James J. Bailey, III, General Robert H. Barrow, Charles
Prosser, M.D. (who is not standing for re-election) and William H. Wright, Jr.
The Audit Committee met six times in 1994. The primary functions of the Audit
Committee are as follows: to review the scope and timing of the audit and
non-audit services to be rendered by the Company's independent accountants; to
approve the audit plans of the independent accountants and internal auditors and
to review their reports upon completion of their audits; to review the
appropriateness of the Company's accounting policies, the adequacy of its
financial controls and the reliability of the financial information reported to
the public; and to report to the Board of Directors on its activities. The
following Directors presently serve on the Compensation Committee: Richard A.
Campbell, Robert D. Kilpatrick and O. Miles Pollard, Jr. The Compensation
Committee met three times in 1994. The primary functions of the Compensation
Committee are as follows: to review and approve, subject to ratification by the
Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer's compensation; to consult with
the Chief Executive Officer and approve compensation for members of senior
management; to administer the Company's stock option plans (other than plans in
which non-employee directors participate), including approval of all awards
thereunder; to approve an annual aggregate amount that may be used for the
current year's management incentive plan and to administer such plan; and to
report to the Board of Directors on its activities. On January 31, 1995, the
Board of Directors established a Nominating Committee to be comprised of
non-management directors. The following directors presently serve on the
Nominating Committee: James J. Bailey, III, Robert D. Kilpatrick and William H.
Wright, Jr. The primary functions of the Nominating Committee are to review the
qualifications of candidates for the Company's Board of Directors suggested by
Board members, management, shareholders and others, to consider the performance
of incumbent directors in determining whether to nominate them for reelection
and to recommend to the Board a slate of nominees for election as directors. For
information regarding the Company's procedures for the submission of shareholder
nominations, see "Proposal 2 -- Part (c) -- Shareholder Nominations and
Proposals".
Directors who are full-time employees of the Company receive no additional
compensation for services as a director. Each non-employee director received
$1,000 per Board meeting and $500 per Committee meeting attended during 1994.
Each Committee Chairman received an annual retainer of $1,000. Each director who
is not an employee of the Company also received during 1994 an annual retainer
of $4,800, paid in quarterly increments.
6
<PAGE> 9
Each director who is not an employee of the Company is entitled to
participate in the Company's 1993 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the
"1993 Director Plan"). The 1993 Director Plan provides for the automatic grant
of stock options to purchase 4,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock to each
non-employee director each year upon his or her election or reelection to the
Board of Directors. On July 22, 1993, each non-employee director was awarded an
option to purchase 8,800 shares of Common Stock (after an adjustment for a 100%
common stock dividend paid on October 18, 1993, and a 10% common stock dividend
paid on January 10, 1995) at an exercise price of $12.84 per share (as
adjusted). The Company also has another option plan for non-employee directors,
the 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "1989 Director Plan"). All
shares reserved for issuance under the 1989 Director Plan, however, have been
awarded pursuant to options. The exercise prices of options awarded under the
1993 and 1989 Director Plans are based upon 100% of the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the date of the grants. As of March 31, 1995, options to
purchase 171,336 shares of Common Stock at an average exercise price of $13.88
are outstanding under the Company's 1989 and 1993 Director Plans.
The Company has entered into employment agreements and has authorized and
plans to execute change of control contracts with each of its officer-directors
as described below under "Employment Agreements and Change of Control
Arrangements".
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In addition to the individuals nominated for director above who are also
executive officers of the Company, the following three individuals presently
serve as executive officers of the Company:
HARRIS J. CHUSTZ
Mr. Chustz, age 79, is Chairman of the Board and of the Executive Committee
of the Company. He has served as an executive officer and director of the
Company since 1972 and was named Chairman of the Board of the Company in 1986.
Mr. Chustz is not standing for reelection to the Board.
W. ROGER CLARK
Mr. Clark, age 48, serves as Executive Vice President of the Company and
President of United Companies Lending Corporation ("UC Lending"), Pelican
Mortgage Company, Inc., United Companies Mortgage of Tennessee, Inc., and Adobe,
Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. Mr. Clark joined the Company in
1983 and was named Executive Vice President of the Company in 1988 and President
of UC Lending in 1990.
ROBERT B. THOMAS, JR.
Mr. Thomas, age 48, serves as Executive Vice President of the Company and
Chairman and President of United Companies Life Insurance Company ("UC Life), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Thomas joined UC Life in February of
1993. Prior to his employment with UC Life, Mr. Thomas served as a principal of
Lewis and Ellis, Inc., a Dallas, Texas actuarial consulting firm and, through
Lewis and Ellis, served as consulting actuary to UC Life for approximately 15
years.
7
<PAGE> 10
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information on the annual and
long-term compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other
four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company for the years
ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION ------------
------------------------------------ AWARDS
OTHER ANNUAL ------------ ALL OTHER
NAME AND BONUS COMPENSATION OPTIONS(3)/ COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) ($)(1)(5) ($)(2) SARS(#) (4)($)
- --------------------------- ----- --------- --------- ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
J. Terrell Brown 1994 $ 378,304 $ 297,205 -- -- $ 43,083
President and Chief 1993 375,625 76,395 -- 55,000 32,114
Executive Officer 1992 373,437 69,677 -- -- 43,498
W. Roger Clark 1994 168,702 136,094 -- -- 23,597
Executive Vice President 1993 155,269 39,027 -- 22,000 12,382
and President, UC Lending 1992 142,188 30,509 -- -- 6,473
John D. Dienes 1994 220,864 241,805 -- 27,499 --
Executive Vice President
and 1993 -- -- -- -- --
Chief Operating Officer 1992 -- -- -- -- --
and President, UCLG
Dale E. Redman 1994 236,014 189,131 -- -- 25,628
Executive Vice President 1993 218,333 55,793 -- 22,000 14,218
and Chief Financial Officer 1992 182,167 39,381 -- -- 13,403
Robert B. Thomas, Jr. 1994 209,366 168,116 -- -- 22,315
Executive Vice President 1993 175,269 49,732 -- 22,000 --
and Chairman and 1992 -- -- -- -- --
President, UC Life
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Amounts awarded under the Company's Management Incentive Plan for the
respective fiscal years, even if deferred. Included in the amounts awarded
to J. Terrell Brown in 1994, 1993 and 1992 were $16,729, $16,998 and
$17,134, respectively, which were deferred pursuant to an unfunded salary
deferral agreement entered into between the Company and Mr. Brown in 1989.
The aggregate amount payable by the Company to Mr. Brown at March 31, 1995
was $119,461.
(2) No personal benefits, which are non-cash compensation, are disclosed in the
"Other Annual Compensation" column since they did not exceed the lesser of
either $50,000 or 10% of the total annual salary and bonus for any of the
named executive officers.
(3) Represents options granted under the Company's stock option plans for
employees after giving effect to stock dividends. All options have been
granted at an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the date of the grant. For additional information regarding
options granted during the last fiscal year, see "Option Grants in Last
Fiscal Year," and for information regarding current holdings of options, see
"Options Exercised and Year-End Values of Unexercised Options".
(4) Amounts reported include amounts contributed or accrued for 1994, 1993 and
1992 for the named officers under the Company's Employee Stock Ownership
Plan ("ESOP") and Employees' Savings Plan and Trust. Amounts for J. Terrell
Brown for 1994, 1993 and 1992 also include $16,998, $17,134 and $17,259
respectively, in loans to Mr. Brown for payment of a portion of the premium
on a life insurance policy. The loans were made without interest and are
secured by an assignment of the policy. See "Transactions with Management
and Others."
(5) Includes $41,667 paid to Mr. Dienes in the form of a bonus upon commencement
of his employment with the Company.
8
<PAGE> 11
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table sets forth information regarding the options granted
during the year ended December 31, 1994 to the Chief Executive Officer and the
other four most highly compensated executive officers.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POTENTIAL
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS REALIZABLE VALUE AT
-------------------------------------------------- ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL OF
SECURITIES OPTIONS STOCK PRICE
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO APPRECIATION
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES EXERCISE FOR OPTION TERM
GRANTED IN FISCAL PRICE EXPIRATION ---------------------
NAME (#)(1) YEAR ($/SH) DATE 5% 10%
- --------------------------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
John D. Dienes............. 27,499 70% $36.8182 2/24/2004 $636,733 $1,613,606
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) The options granted to the named executive were awarded under the Company's
1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"). The options granted under the
1993 Plan are not exercisable, except in limited circumstances, until three
years have elapsed from the date such options are granted. The exercise
price of the options, which can be no less than 100% of the fair market
value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, has been adjusted to
reflect a 10% stock dividend paid by the Company on January 10, 1995. The
number of shares underlying the above options have also been adjusted to
reflect such stock dividend. The options will expire ten years from the date
of grant.
OPTIONS EXERCISED AND YEAR-END VALUES OF UNEXERCISED OPTIONS
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 1994,
regarding the number of shares received and the value realized upon exercise of
stock options, and the number and value of exercisable and unexercisable options
to purchase Common Stock of the Company held by the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and the other four most highly compensated executive officers.
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END 1994 OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VALUE OF
NUMBER OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
SHARES OPTIONS AT OPTIONS AT FISCAL
ACQUIRED FISCAL YEAR-END(#) YEAR-END($)(1)(2)(3)
ON VALUE --------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME EXERCISE(#) REALIZED($) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- --------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
J. Terrell Brown........... -- -- 76,912 55,000 $1,563,927 $ 785,626
W. Roger Clark............. 10,120 $ 247,700 34,530 22,000 705,500 314,250
John D. Dienes............. -- -- -- 27,499 -- --
Dale E. Redman............. 11,000 341,182 51,744 22,000 1,057,126 314,250
Robert B. Thomas, Jr....... -- -- -- 22,000 -- 364,875
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) All options were awarded at the fair market value of the shares of Common
Stock on the date of the grant.
(2) Values in each column are based on the closing price, as reported on the
National Association of Securities Dealers Quotations National Stock Market
("NASDAQ NSM"), of the Company's Common Stock on December 31, 1994
($27.125).
(3) The exercise prices of the reported options range from $5.53 to $36.8182 per
share (as adjusted for stock dividends) with a weighted average exercise
price of $11.60.
9
<PAGE> 12
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors during
1994 were Richard A. Campbell, Robert D. Kilpatrick and O. Miles Pollard, Jr. No
member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries during 1994. No executive officer of the Company
served during 1994 as a director or as a member of the compensation committee of
another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director or on the
Compensation Committee of the Company.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
GENERAL
The Compensation Committee ("the Committee") of the Company's Board of
Directors has furnished the following report on executive compensation in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This report outlines the duties of the Committee with respect to
executive compensation, the components of the Company's executive officer
compensation program and the basis on which the 1994 compensation was determined
for the executive officers of the Company, with particular detail given to the
Company's Chief Executive Officer's 1994 compensation.
During 1994, the Committee was comprised of the following Board members,
each of whom were outside directors of the Company: Richard A. Campbell,
Chairman, Robert D. Kilpatrick, and O. Miles Pollard, Jr.
Duties of the Committee include establishing the compensation program for
the Chief Executive Officer, consulting with the Chief Executive Officer and
approving compensation for other executive officers, administering the
Management Incentive Plan and approving the annual amount to be distributed as
bonuses thereunder, and administering the Company's stock option plans for
employees. In performing the duties described above, the Committee observes the
following guidelines: (i) to provide a competitive compensation program that
enables the Company to attract, retain and motivate a high-quality executive
management team focused on enhancing shareholder value; (ii) to coordinate
compensation programs with the Company's annual and long-term objectives and
strategies; and (iii) to provide compensation opportunities that are based on
the performance of the Company.
The Committee's philosophy on executive compensation is to link
compensation to the value and level of performance of the executive. To achieve
this, various pay delivery systems comprise the Company's compensation program
for executive officers and key employees. The principal components of the
Company's compensation program are salary and incentive compensation, which
includes cash bonuses and equity-based incentives (stock options and, commencing
in 1995, contingent upon shareholder approval, the award of "restricted" stock).
The compensation decisions of the Committee relative to the Company's executive
officers and key employees are described below as to each of the foregoing
components.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS GENERALLY
Salary. The salary levels of the Company's executive officers are reviewed
by the Committee annually. In determining appropriate base-salary levels, the
Committee considers such factors as duties and responsibilities inherent in the
position in question, initiative, performance, tenure and pay practices for
executives of other companies in the financial services industry, as well as
business conditions generally prevailing in the mortgage and insurance
industries.
Cash Bonuses. Annual awards are made to executives and key employees of
cash compensation pursuant to the Company's Management Incentive Plan. The cash
bonuses are based upon the attainment by the Company of financial objectives
based on return on equity during the prior year. Awards are made from a bonus
pool determined as a percentage of the Company's prior year net income as
specified by the Committee; however, funding of the bonus pool is capped at 10%
of after tax net income. Plan participants are assigned to one of five
eligibility levels based on the participant's contribution to and impact upon
the success of the Company. Bonuses are not paid unless a specified threshold
level of financial performance is achieved by the Company, which is presently
set at a minimum of a 10% return on equity. Accordingly, compensation of
10
<PAGE> 13
executive officers and key employees is generally higher during years in which
Company performance meets or exceeds the specified goals. Net income for the
year ended December 31, 1994, totaled $49.5 million compared to $11.6 million
during 1993. As a result, total cash bonuses paid to 102 individuals
participating in the incentive plan during 1994 was approximately $2.6 million
compared to cash bonuses of approximately $.5 million paid to 84 individuals
participating in the plan during 1993. In administering the Management Incentive
Plan for 1994 and approving the annual amount to be distributed as bonuses
thereunder, the Committee decided that the bonuses based on 1994 net income of
the Company paid to the members of the executive management committee would be
fifty percent of the amount otherwise payable to them thereunder.
Equity-Based Incentives. The Company maintains stock option plans to
provide officers, supervisory personnel, other key employees and consultants
with additional incentive to promote the financial success of the Company as
reflected in increased value of the Company's Common Stock. Options granted
under the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan for employees have generally been
long-term (10 years) and vest three years after the date of grant. With such
features, the Company considers stock options as a way of aligning the interests
of management with the long-term interests of the Company's shareholders and
inducing such executives to remain with the Company on a long-term basis. During
1994, options to purchase 27,499 shares (as adjusted for the 10% common stock
dividend paid January 10, 1995) of the Company's Common Stock were awarded to
John D. Dienes in connection with his joining the Company as Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer. The exercise price of the options awarded
to Mr. Dienes is $36.8182, the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock
on the date of grant (as adjusted for stock dividends). No other executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table were awarded stock options
during 1994. As of December 31, 1994, options to purchase in the aggregate
678,387 shares of the Company's Common Stock were held by 347 employees under
the Company's stock option plans for employees. Included in this amount as of
December 31, 1994, were options to purchase 311,685 shares of the Company's
Common Stock at an average exercise price of $11.60 held by the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The Committee has recommended
an amendment to the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan to provide for the award
of restricted stock under such plan. The Board of Directors has approved the
amendment and it is being submitted for shareholder approval at the 1995 Annual
Meeting. On February 23, 1995, the Committee made the following awards of
restricted stock under the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan to the Chief Executive
Officer and other executive officers, subject to the approval of the plan
amendment by the shareholders: Mr. Brown, 9,500 shares, Mr. Redman, 6,500
shares; Mr. Dienes, 6,500 shares; Mr. Clark, 5,000 shares; and Mr. Thomas, 5,000
shares. Each of the awards to the foregoing executives vest in 50% increments on
February 23, 1996, and February 23, 1997, respectively, if (i) the executive is
still in the employ of the Company on each date and (ii) the Company reaches
certain performance levels established by the Committee pursuant to the proposed
amendment to the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan.
The Committee has also recommended and the Board of Directors has approved
an amendment to the Management Incentive Plan to allow a participant to elect to
receive all or part of the cash bonus otherwise to be awarded thereunder in
shares of Common Stock. This amendment is also being submitted for shareholder
approval at the 1995 Annual Meeting. The Company considers this amendment as
well as the amendment to the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan as additional
means of (i) providing compensation through equity-based incentives; and (ii)
linking the interests of management with the long-term interests of the Company
and its shareholders.
COMPENSATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
In establishing the compensation for Mr. Brown, the Committee observes the
same guidelines as set forth for executive officers generally. No specific
weighting is assigned to these guidelines, or factors, in determining the Chief
Executive Officer's compensation. During 1994, the base salary of Mr. Brown
remained substantially the same as the previous year as Mr. Brown waived the
guaranteed increase in base salary under his employment contract with the
Company, which is discussed in greater detail below. The increase in total
compensation of Mr. Brown for 1994 resulted from his participation in the
Management Incentive Plan, which is based upon the performance of the Company as
discussed above.
11
<PAGE> 14
POLICY WITH RESPECT TO QUALIFYING COMPENSATION FOR DEDUCTIBILITY
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, limits the
deduction allowable to the Company for compensation paid to the Chief Executive
Officer and each of the four other most highly compensated executive officers to
$1 million. Qualified performance-based compensation is excluded from this
limitation if certain requirements are met. The Company's policy is generally to
preserve the Federal income tax deductibility of compensation paid, to the
extent feasible. The Committee believes that awards under the Company's
Management Incentive Plan and its awards of options made under stock option
plans for employees will qualify as performance-based compensation and thereby
be excluded from the $1 million limitation. Notwithstanding the Company's policy
to preserve the Federal income tax deductibility of compensation payments, under
certain circumstances, the Committee, in its discretion, may authorize payments,
such as salary, bonuses or otherwise that may cause an executive officer's
income to exceed the deductible limits.
Richard A. Campbell, Chairman
Robert D. Kilpatrick
O. Miles Pollard, Jr.
12
<PAGE> 15
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has employment contracts with key management employees,
including Messrs. Brown, Dienes and Redman. The term of the contracts with
Messrs. Brown and Redman extends to June 1, 1997, and with Mr. Dienes to
February, 1996, and each contract generally requires payment of a minimum base
salary with guaranteed annual increases for the term of the contract.
The Company also has in effect deferred compensation agreements with
Messrs. Brown and Redman pursuant to which, upon retirement at or after age 55,
the employee will receive deferred compensation payments in monthly payments for
10 years. The deferred compensation amount increases based on the number of
years of service after age 55, with a cap at age 70. For Messrs. Brown and
Redman, should they elect to exercise this agreement at age 55, they will
receive $35,000 per annum for the 10 year period. Should they wait until age 65
to exercise this agreement, they will receive $200,000 and $135,000 per annum,
respectively, for the 10 year period. The Company has purchased life insurance
on the lives of Messrs. Brown and Redman to fund its obligations under these
deferred compensation agreements. Under a separate split dollar agreement, the
beneficiaries of Messrs. Brown and Redman will receive a death benefit equal to
the policy value, $1,365,000 and $1,120,000, respectively, minus the lesser of
the cash value of the policy or premiums paid and any policy indebtedness to the
insurer. Under an additional unfunded salary deferral agreement entered into in
1989, a specified amount of compensation otherwise payable to Mr. Brown is
credited to an account to be paid to Mr. Brown or beneficiaries designated by
him on the earlier of Mr. Brown's death or termination of employment. During
1994, Mr. Brown's compensation, as reflected in the Bonus section of the Summary
Compensation Table, includes $16,729 which was deferred pursuant to this
agreement.
In addition, the Company has supplemental retirement agreements with
Messrs. Clark, Dienes and Thomas pursuant to which, upon retirement, the
employee will receive monthly payments for 15 years. The annual amounts payable
under such agreements are as follows: Mr. Clark, $60,000; Mr. Dienes, $84,000;
and Mr. Thomas $60,000. The Company has purchased life insurance on the lives of
Messrs. Clark, Dienes and Thomas to fund its obligations under these agreements.
Although not the purpose of these employment, deferred compensation and
supplemental retirement agreements, a possible effect of such contracts may be
to discourage or deter a potential tender offer for the Company.
The Company has authorized and plans to execute during 1995 change of
control contracts with Messrs. Brown, Dienes and Redman. The contracts will
provide, in general, that each executive will be entitled to a lump sum payment
of two years salary and bonus plus the continuation of certain benefits if the
executive is terminated without cause or his duties or responsibilities are
diminished within 24 months after a change of control of the Company. The
Company believes that these contracts are important in retaining qualified
management through a transition in ownership, if a change were to occur, by
providing such executives with a certain comfort level during such transition so
that they can focus on what is in the best interests of the shareholders rather
than on their position with the Company.
13
<PAGE> 16
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following line graph provides a comparison of the total shareholder
return on the Company's Common Stock with the return of the NASDAQ Index for
U.S. Companies and the NASDAQ Index of Financial Stocks for the period
commencing January 1, 1990 and ending December 31, 1994. All amounts have been
calculated as if all dividends were reinvested.
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE
TOTAL RETURN OF THE COMPANY, NASDAQ (U.S. COMPANIES)
AND NASDAQ FINANCIAL STOCKS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNITED COM- NASDAQ STOCK
PANIES FINAN- NASDAQ STOCK MARKET
MEASUREMENT PERIOD CIAL MARKET (U.S. FINANCIAL
(FISCAL YEAR COVERED) CORPORATION COMPANIES) STOCKS
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1989 100.0 100.0 100.0
1990 92.9 84.9 76.6
1991 135.8 136.3 118.6
1992 120.1 158.6 169.5
1993 539.5 180.9 197.0
1994 412.0 176.9 197.6
</TABLE>
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
The Company and its subsidiaries have, from time to time, made loans to
certain of its executive officers and directors and/or to entities in which such
persons have a material interest. Each of these loans is secured by a first
mortgage on the residence, and/or commercial or other real estate. There were no
such loans outstanding during 1994 nor through March 31, 1995.
Since 1989, the Company has made loans to Mr. Brown without interest,
secured by an assignment of a life insurance policy owned by Mr. Brown. The
loans were incurred to pay a portion of the premium on the assigned life
insurance policy. The Company has agreed to make annual loans of comparable
amounts for payment of a portion of these insurance premiums through the earlier
of the date of termination of Mr. Brown's employment or 2004. As of March 31,
1995, the aggregate amount owed by Mr. Brown on such loans was $119,461.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries have
purchased liability, worker's compensation, fidelity bond and various property
and other insurance coverage from the Wright Insurance Agency, Inc., of which
Mr. Wright is the majority owner. Premiums paid by the Company and its
subsidiaries for this insurance coverage were approximately $1.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 1994. The Company and its subsidiaries expect to
purchase additional insurance coverage in the future from the Wright Insurance
Agency, Inc. The Company believes that the premiums paid to the Wright Insurance
Agency, Inc. for the above-described coverage are comparable to those premiums
that would be charged by an unaffiliated third party for insurance of similar
coverage.
14
<PAGE> 17
At December 31, 1994, the Company had loans to the ESOP with an aggregate
principal balance outstanding of $4.3 million. The loans are to be repaid with
interest at rates which range from 7.85% to 9.5% per annum. The proceeds of the
loans were used by the ESOP for purchases of the Company's Common Stock.
INTRODUCTION TO PROPOSALS 2 AND 3 -- AMENDMENTS
TO THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
Proposal 2 is a single amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation
that would require the affirmative vote of the holders of no less than 80% of
the total voting power of the Company to alter, amend or repeal the following
amendments to the Company's by-laws that were adopted by the Board of Directors
on January 31, 1995, are in effect, and are being submitted to the shareholders
solely to make it more difficult for shareholders to change them. The
amendments, which are described in greater detail below: (1) authorize the Board
of Directors exclusively to fix the number of directors by no less than a
66 2/3% vote and classify the Board into three classes with staggered terms; (2)
provide procedures for the removal of directors and for filling vacancies on the
Board; (3) provide advance notice procedures for shareholder nominations and
proposals; and (4) provide procedures for the calling of a special meeting of
the shareholders.
Proposal 3 describes other amendments to the Company's Articles of
Incorporation adopted by the Board of Directors, and which are being submitted
to the shareholders for approval: (a) to provide that no action may be taken by
the shareholders except at an annual or special meeting; (b) to provide that a
special meeting of the shareholders may be called only by a written request
signed by the holders of no less than 66 2/3% of the total voting power of the
Company; (c) to provide that amendments (a) and (b) may not be amended, altered
or repealed except by the affirmative vote of the holders of no less than 80% of
the total voting power of the Company; and (d) to eliminate the right of a
director absent from a meeting of the Board or any committee thereof to give a
proxy to another director or to a shareholder. These amendments to the Articles
of Incorporation are not presently in effect and will become effective only if
approved by the shareholders.
The proposed amendments to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company
embodied in Proposals 2 and 3 are set forth in their entirety in Exhibit "A"
attached to this proxy statement. Any discussion herein of the proposed
amendments is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the amendments set
forth in Exhibit "A". The Board of Directors has unanimously adopted the
aforedescribed amendments to the Company's Articles of Incorporation, has
determined that such amendments are advisable and has unanimously voted to
recommend them to the Company's shareholders for approval.
Taken together, the amendments to the Articles of Incorporation and by-laws
of the Company (which amendments, under the proposed amendment to the Articles,
may not be amended, altered or repealed without the 80% shareholder vote) will
make more difficult, and thus may discourage any attempt, to gain control of the
Company through a proxy contest or through the acquisition of the Company's
Common Stock, and as a result, will tend to perpetuate the control of present
management. The 80% voting requirements in certain provisions of the amendments
contained in Proposals 2 and 3 could allow the holders of just over 20% of the
total voting power of the Company to defeat proposed actions that might be
supported by persons holding a majority of the total voting power of the
Company. As set forth under "Security Holdings of Management and Others", the
present directors and executive officers of the Company are the beneficial
owners of 10.893% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. In the opinion of
the Board, there has been a trend towards the accumulation of substantial stock
positions in public companies as a prelude to proposing a takeover or a
significant corporate restructuring. Such "tactics" are frequently implemented
without any advance notice to or consultation with the company's board of
directors, and frequently involve attempts by minority shareholders to gain
representation on or control of the company's board without the incumbent
directors being given an opportunity to determine whether the interests of such
minority shareholders coincide with the shareholders as a group.
Although the Board is not aware of any attempt to gain control of the
Company or representation on the Board through accumulation of shares or
otherwise, the Board believes that efforts by a purchaser of a significant
number of shares of the Company's Common Stock to acquire control of the Board
could adversely
15
<PAGE> 18
affect the Board's ability to protect the interests of the Company and its other
shareholders by negotiating with such a purchaser, evaluating such purchaser's
plans for the Company or considering alternatives to such purchaser's proposals.
Takeovers or changes in management of the Company which are proposed and
effected without prior consultation and negotiation with the Company's Board of
Directors are not necessarily detrimental to the interests of shareholders, and,
to the extent the proposed amendments discourage a prospective purchaser from
acquiring a significant interest in the Company's Common Stock with a view
toward acquiring control, the amendments could deprive shareholders of an
opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over the prevailing market price.
The Board believes, however, that the amendments described below are in the best
interests of the shareholders because they will encourage any party interested
in pursuing such an attempt to negotiate with the Board, and will provide
additional time and flexibility to respond to any proposal to gain control of
the Company, and that such benefits outweigh any potential disadvantages to
shareholders. Presently the Company's Board of Directors has no intention of
proposing additional anti-takeover measures in future proxy solicitations.
The Company's Articles of Incorporation presently contain provisions that
have intended "anti-takeover" effects. Article VII of the Articles of
Incorporation includes certain provisions (the "Special Vote Provisions") that
require the affirmative vote of 80% of the outstanding shares of the Company's
voting stock before the Company may enter into a (i) merger or consolidation
with any other corporation, (ii) a sale or lease of substantially all of the
assets of the Company to any other corporation, person or entity, or (iii) a
sale or lease to the Company by any other corporation, person or entity of
assets having a value in excess of $1 million in exchange for voting stock of
the Company if, in each case, such other corporation, person or entity, directly
or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of the Company's voting stock prior
to any such transaction. The Special Vote Provisions apply only to the above
described transactions which do not receive prior approval of the Board of
Directors. Article VII of the Articles of Incorporation also contain certain
provisions (the "Takeover Consideration Provisions") authorizing the Board of
Directors, in evaluating an offer from a third party to merge with or acquire
the shares or assets of the Company, to give due consideration to certain
factors not directly related either to the price per share offered for or the
then market price of the Company's Common Stock. The Special Vote and Takeover
Consideration Provisions may be altered only by the affirmative vote of 80% of
the outstanding shares of the Company's voting stock.
On July 27, 1994, the Board of Directors of the Company redeemed all rights
reserved under the Company's rights plan adopted in February 1989, adopted a new
Rights Plan (the "Rights Plan"), declared a dividend of one preferred stock
purchase right (a "Right") on August 6, 1994, and authorized the issuance of one
Right for each outstanding share of Common Stock issued after August 6, 1994,
before the earliest of the Distribution Date, the Redemption Date and the Final
Expiration Date (as each term is defined in the Rights Plan). The Rights have
"anti-takeover" effects since, among other things, the Rights will cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire the Company
on terms not approved by the Board of Directors, except pursuant to an offer
conditioned on a substantial number of Rights being acquired.
As a Louisiana corporation, the Company is subject to the provisions of the
Louisiana Business Corporation Law (the "LBCL"), which contains "fair price" and
"control share acquisition" provisions. Each of these provisions imposes
significant restrictions on the ability of an acquiror of a large block of
voting stock of a Louisiana corporation to exercise control over the
corporation. The "fair price" provisions are designed to restrict the ability of
a Louisiana corporation to enter into mergers or other extraordinary corporate
transactions with certain shareholders. These provisions require that certain
business combinations between a Louisiana corporation and "interested
shareholders" must be approved by (i) the corporation's board of directors, (ii)
the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the voting stock of the corporation, and
(iii) the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the voting stock of the corporation
(excluding stock held by the interested shareholders), unless the business
combination satisfies certain "fair price" tests regarding the payments to be
made to shareholders and meets certain other procedural requirements. The
"control share acquisition" provisions of the LBCL provide, generally, that
persons who, after May 4, 1987, acquire stock that would normally entitle them
to exercise 20% or more of the voting power of the corporation will not be able
to vote
16
<PAGE> 19
the shares acquired by them in excess of 20% of such voting power unless their
ability to vote is reinstated by the shareholders of the corporation at a
meeting held after the acquiring person requests such a vote.
The Company also has two wholly-owned subsidiaries that are Louisiana
chartered insurance companies, United Companies Life Insurance Company and
United General Title Insurance Company. Ownership of these two subsidiaries can,
under applicable Louisiana law, delay or impede a change of control of the
Company. Section 731 of the Louisiana Insurance Code provides that a Louisiana
insurer may merge or consolidate with or acquire control of another insurer, or
a person may acquire control of a Louisiana insurance company, only if the plan
of merger or consolidation or acquisition of control is submitted to or receives
advance approval from the Louisiana Commissioner of Insurance after a public
hearing thereon. Louisiana's Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Law,
constituting Part XXI-A of the Louisiana Insurance Code, requires the filing of
periodic registration statements by the Company with the Louisiana Commissioner
of Insurance and regulates transactions among members of an insurance holding
company system such as that of the Company. Any change of control (10% or more
of voting securities is presumed to constitute control for purposes of this
legislation) requires notification to, hearing before and approval of the
Louisiana Commissioner of Insurance.
While the foregoing summarizes several anti-takeover measures previously
adopted by the Company and certain provisions of Louisiana law that would give
the Company some anti-takeover protection, the Board of Directors does not
believe that the Company's previously adopted anti-takeover measures and such
legislation alone is sufficient to protect the interests of the Company's
shareholders as a whole. As a result, the Board of Directors is recommending
several additional anti-takeover measures for approval of the shareholders that
it believes are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
PROPOSAL 2 -- AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
TO REQUIRE A SUPER MAJORITY VOTE OF THE SHAREHOLDERS TO AMEND,
ALTER OR REPEAL CERTAIN EXISTING PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANY'S BY-LAWS.
Proposal 2 has four parts: (a) Staggered Board and Number of Directors; (b)
Removal of Directors and Filling Vacancies; (c) Shareholder Nominations and
Proposals; and (d) Right to Call Special Shareholders' Meeting. Shareholders may
vote for, against or abstain from voting with respect to each of the four parts
of Proposal 2, and need not vote or abstain consistently with respect to such
parts.
Proposal 2 is a single amendment (the "Super Majority Vote Amendment") to
the Articles of Incorporation that would require an affirmative vote of the
holders of no less than 80% of the total voting power of all shares of the
Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together
as a single class (the "Super Majority Vote"), to amend, alter, change, waive or
repeal, directly or indirectly, or to adopt any provision inconsistent with,
certain amendments to the Company's by-laws that were adopted by the Board of
Directors on and effective as of January 31, 1995. The amendments to the
Company's by-laws to which the Super Majority Vote Amendment relates are
discussed in greater detail below, but such discussion of the amendments is
qualified in its entirety by the text of each of the provisions of the by-laws
which are attached hereto as Exhibit "B". The amendments to the Company's
by-laws will continue in effect even if the Super Majority Vote Amendment is not
approved by the shareholders of the Company.
PART (A) -- STAGGERED BOARD AND NUMBER OF DIRECTORS
General
The proposal would require a Super Majority Vote to amend, alter or repeal
Section 4.1 of the Company's by-laws. Section 4.1 provides, in part, that the
number of directors of the Company shall be fixed exclusively from time to time
by resolution duly adopted by a vote of no less than 66 2/3% of the entire Board
of Directors. The number of directors nominated for election at the 1995 Annual
Meeting has been fixed by the Board of Directors at eleven. For more information
regarding the nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the 1995 Annual
Meeting, see "Election of Directors". Section 4.1 also provides that, beginning
with the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the directors shall be divided
into three classes, as nearly equal in number as
17
<PAGE> 20
possible, with each class initially elected at the 1995 Annual Meeting to serve
terms of one, two and three years, respectively, with each director being
assigned to one of the three classes as provided by the Board. Thus, directors
elected at the 1995 Annual Meeting in the first class will hold office until the
1996 Annual Meeting; those in the second class will hold office until the 1997
Annual Meeting; and those in the third class will hold office until the 1998
Annual Meeting; or, in each case, the directors will serve until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. For more information regarding which
class the nominees for directors at the 1995 Annual Meeting have been assigned,
see "Election of Directors". At each Annual Meeting commencing with the 1996
Annual Meeting, directors elected to succeed those in the class whose terms then
expire will be elected to three-year terms, so that the terms of one class of
directors will expire each year at the Annual Meeting of shareholders. Thus,
after 1995, shareholders will elect only one-third of the directors at each
Annual Meeting. Finally, the staggered board provision will apply to every
election of directors, whether or not a change in control of the Company has
occurred or if the holders of a majority of the voting power of the Company
desire to change the Board. Under the present provisions of the Articles and the
LBCL, the shareholders, by majority vote of the shares present in person or by
proxy at a duly called shareholders' meeting (which requires a quorum of a
majority of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding), could amend, alter or
repeal Section 4.1 of the by-laws.
Advantages
A Board of Directors fixed as set forth above with staggered terms would
facilitate continuity and stability of leadership and policy by assuring that
experienced personnel familiar with the Company and its business will be on the
Company's Board of Directors at all times. It would prevent precipitous changes
in the composition of the Company's Board of Directors and the manner of its
election and, thereby, would make it more difficult to effect changes in the
Company's policies, business strategies and operations that are not in the best
interests of the Company and its shareholders. The proposal, by requiring a
Super-Majority Vote, precludes a potential acquiror from amending the Company's
by-laws in order to increase the size of the Board and then attempt to fill
those vacancies in an effort to acquire control of the Company.
A staggered board is a way, like the Company's Rights Plan, to encourage
persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to initiate such an
acquisition through arm's-length negotiations with the management and Board of
Directors of the Company, who would then be in a position to negotiate a
transaction that is fair and in the best interests of all shareholders. A
staggered Board of Directors will require at least two Annual Meetings of
Shareholders, instead of one, for shareholders to effect a change in the
majority of the Company's Board of Directors (assuming that the shareholders
approve the Super Majority Vote Amendment as it relates to the existing by-law
provision regarding removal of directors discussed below in part (b)). Under the
provisions of the Company's by-laws prior to the Board amendments, a change in
the majority of the Board could have been effected at one shareholders' meeting.
Although staggered board provisions are not designed to be, and are not,
effective against an any-and-all cash tender offer, staggered board provisions
have provided boards of directors with additional leverage to negotiate
protections for corporate constituencies even after a takeover bidder has
acquired a majority of their company's stock.
Disadvantages
A fixed board with staggered terms will make it more difficult for
shareholders to change the composition of the Company's Board of Directors even
if the shareholders believe such a change would be desirable. In addition,
because of the additional time required to change control of the Board, the
amendment would tend to perpetuate incumbent directors, even if they were not
adequately fulfilling their duties. Since the proposed amendment would increase
the amount of time required for a takeover bidder to obtain control of the
Company without the cooperation of the Company's Board of Directors, even if the
takeover bidder were to acquire a majority of the Company's outstanding Common
Stock, the presence of a staggered board provision might, like the Rights Plan,
tend to discourage certain types of tender offers, perhaps including some tender
offers that shareholders might feel would be in their best interests. As a
result, shareholders may be deprived of opportunities to sell some or all of
their shares in a tender offer for control, which usually involves a purchase
price that is higher than the current market price and often involves a bidding
contest between
18
<PAGE> 21
competing takeover bidders. A fixed board with staggered terms could also
discourage open market purchases by a potential takeover bidder, which could
temporarily increase the market price of the Company's Common Stock and thereby
enable shareholders to sell their shares at a price higher than that which would
otherwise have prevailed. In addition, a fixed board with staggered terms could
decrease the market price of the Company's Common Stock by making it less
attractive to persons who invest in securities in anticipation of an increase in
price if a takeover attempt develops.
PART (B) -- REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS AND FILLING VACANCIES
General
Sections 4.16 and 4.13, respectively, of the by-laws of the Company,
provide that (i) any director or directors may be removed from office only by a
Super Majority Vote and (ii) any vacancy resulting in the Board of Directors
shall be exclusively filled by a vote of no less than 66 2/3% of the remaining
directors. Under the present Articles and the LBCL, the shareholders, by a
majority vote of the shares present in person or by proxy at a duly called
shareholders' meeting (which requires a quorum of a majority of the total shares
of Common Stock outstanding), could amend, alter, or repeal Sections 4.16 and
4.13 of the by-laws. The proposal would require a Super Majority Vote to amend,
alter or repeal either of these two by-law provisions. The LBCL provides that
directors may be removed from office by the shareholders by a vote of a majority
of the total voting power at any special meeting called for such purpose. The
LBCL further provides that vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled by
a majority vote of the remaining directors. The LBCL, however, allows Louisiana
corporations to adopt provisions that provide otherwise, such as the Company's
by-laws.
Advantages
Requiring a Super Majority Vote to remove any director or directors is
consistent with, and supportive of, the purposes of adopting a staggered board
since together the two provisions tend to moderate the pace at which the
Company's Board of Directors could be changed. In addition, the removal
provision will properly condition a director's continued service upon his or her
ability to serve, rather than his or her position relative to a takeover bidder
or a dominant shareholder. Permitting directors rather than shareholders to fill
vacancies is a further deterrent to the strategy of removing existing directors
and replacing them with persons chosen by a takeover bidder. It would also
prevent those seeking majority representation on the Company's Board from
attempting to obtain such representation through expanding the size of the Board
and filling the new directorships with their nominees.
Disadvantages
The removal provision of the Company's by-laws would make it more difficult
to remove any director, even if such removal is believed to be in the
shareholders' best interests. And, since the directors have the power to retain
and discharge management, the removal provision makes it more difficult to
remove management. Accordingly, the provision could tend to perpetuate the
Company's incumbent directors and management. Finally, the removal provision
would render more difficult and may discourage an attempt to acquire control of
the Company. The provision regarding filling vacancies eliminates the ability of
shareholders to vote for new directors to fill vacancies on the Company's Board
of Directors.
PART(C) -- SHAREHOLDER NOMINATIONS AND PROPOSALS
General
Subsection 4.9.2 of the Company's by-laws provides that shareholders may
submit nominations for director only if (a) written notice thereof is delivered
to the Company at least 60 days in advance of the Annual Meeting at which the
nomination is to be considered (or if fewer than 70 days notice or prior public
disclosure of the meeting date is given or made to shareholders, then not later
than the tenth day following the day on which the notice of the date of the
meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made) and (b) certain specified
information regarding the shareholder submitting the nomination and the
nominee(s) is
19
<PAGE> 22
provided to the Company along with such notice. With respect to the shareholder,
the submission must contain (a) the name and address, as they appear on the
Company's books, of the shareholder; (b) the number of shares beneficially owned
by the shareholder; (c) a description of all arrangements or understandings
between the shareholder and any nominee(s) the shareholder proposes to nominate;
(d) a representation by the shareholder that the shareholder will attend the
meeting to move consideration of the nomination(s); and (e) a representation by
the shareholder that the shareholder will remain a shareholder through the
record date of the meeting. With respect to the nominee(s) for director, the
shareholder shall provide all information that is required to be disclosed in
solicitation of proxies for the election of directors, or as otherwise required,
in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, including, but not limited to, the consent of each nominee to be
named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
Section 4.2 of the Company's by-laws provides that any proposals submitted
by shareholders for consideration at an Annual or Special Meeting that are
timely delivered to the Company and in proper written form can be considered at
such meeting. To be timely delivered, the shareholder proposal must be received
by the Company at least 60 days prior to the Annual or Special Meeting at which
the proposal is to be considered (or if fewer than 70 days notice or prior
public disclosure of the meeting date is given or made to shareholders, then not
later than the tenth day following the day on which the notice of the date of
the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made). To be in proper
written form, the shareholder must provide a brief description of the proposal,
the reason(s) for submitting the proposal, the name and address of the
shareholder, the number of shares beneficially owned by the shareholder, any
material interest of the shareholder in the proposal, and representations that
the shareholder will attend the meeting to move consideration of the proposal at
the meeting and that the shareholder will remain a shareholder of record through
the record date of the meeting.
Further, Section 2.3 of the by-laws designates the Chairman, or in his
absence, the Vice Chairman, or in his absence, the Chief Executive Officer as
the officer to preside over all meetings of the shareholders. In addition, it
provides that no business shall be conducted at any shareholders' meeting except
in accordance with the procedures set forth in the by-laws, including
shareholder proposals and nominations. Finally, Section 2.3 authorizes the
presiding officer, if the facts warrant, to determine and declare to the meeting
that business or nominations were not properly brought before the meeting in
accordance with the by-laws and that any such business or nominations shall not
be transacted or submitted for consideration at the meeting.
The proposal would require a Super Majority Vote to amend, alter or repeal
Sections 2.3 and 4.2 and Subsection 4.9.2 of the by-laws. Under the present
Articles and the LBCL, the shareholders, by majority vote of the shares present
in person or by proxy at a duly called shareholders' meeting (which requires a
quorum of a majority of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding), could
amend, alter or repeal any of these three by-law provisions.
Advantages
Advance notice of nominations of directors by shareholders will afford a
meaningful opportunity for the Board of Directors to consider and investigate
the qualifications of the proposed nominees and, to the extent necessary or
desirable, will provide the Board of Directors with an opportunity to inform
shareholders about the qualifications of the nominees and to submit its position
regarding their election. This will better enable shareholders to determine
whether they desire to attend the meeting or grant a proxy to the Company's
Board of Directors or, if solicited, to the nominating shareholder regarding the
election of directors. It will also provide the Company's Board of Directors
with additional time to respond to nominations that are a part of coercive
takeover tactics and to consider appropriate alternatives to enhance the
Company's ability to negotiate with the potential acquiror. Accordingly,
adoption of the proposal as it relates to shareholder nominations may have the
effect of delaying, discouraging or making more difficult certain tender offers,
attempted business combinations, proxy contests or an assumption of control of
the Company.
Section 4.2 of the by-laws provides a more orderly procedure for conducting
meetings of shareholders by avoiding unannounced surprise proposals at the
meetings. It would also provide the Company's Board of
20
<PAGE> 23
Directors with a meaningful advance opportunity to consider the merits of a
shareholder proposal, as well as the opportunity to advise shareholders in
advance regarding the proposal, its merits and the voting recommendation of the
Company's Board of Directors. This would enable the shareholders to determine
whether they desire to attend the meeting or grant a proxy to the Board of
Directors or, if solicited, to the proponent regarding the proposal. Adoption of
the proposal also would provide the Company's Board of Directors with sufficient
time to consider appropriate alternatives to the proposal or to take proper
actions to thwart a takeover related proposal that they do not believe is in the
best interests of shareholders.
Disadvantages of Provisions Regarding Shareholder Nominations and Proposals
The advance notice requirement for nominations may delay or deter contests
for a change of control of the Company through its Board of Directors even
though a large percentage of shareholders might believe such a change would be
beneficial to the shareholders. Moreover, it could disadvantage shareholders who
desire to nominate directors in an effort to gain a minority voice on the
Company's Board of Directors or to change the direction of the Company, but do
not have the resources or desire to seize control of the Company or to undertake
an election contest against the nominees of the Company's Board of Directors.
Section 4.2 of the by-laws makes it more difficult for shareholders to
cause changes in the management or operation of the Company or to effect
transactions that are opposed by the Company's incumbent Board of Directors.
Furthermore, it could cause worthwhile shareholder proposals to be eliminated
from consideration simply because the need or idea for the proposal did not
arise within the requisite time period. In addition, it could have the effect of
discouraging a third party from making an offer or otherwise attempting to
obtain control of the Company even though such action may be viewed as
beneficial by the Company's shareholders.
PART (D) -- RIGHT TO CALL SPECIAL SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING
General
Section 2.2 of the Company's by-laws provides that, except as provided in
the Company's Articles of Incorporation (which the Board of Directors is
proposing to amend, as described below, to limit the right of shareholders to
call a special shareholders' meeting), a special meeting of the shareholders may
only be called by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or by
resolution of the Board of Directors adopted by a vote of no less than 66 2/3%
of the entire Board. The proposal would require a Super Majority Vote to change
Section 2.2 of the by-laws. Under the present Articles and the LBCL, the
shareholders by majority vote of the shares present in person or by proxy at a
duly called shareholders' meeting (which requires a quorum of a majority of the
total shares of Common Stock outstanding), could amend, alter or repeal Section
2.2 of the by-laws. See also "Proposal 3 -- Part (b) -- Shareholder Right to
Call a Special Meeting" regarding the right of shareholders to call a special
meeting if the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is not
adopted. As set forth pursuant to Part (b) of Proposal 3 below, the Board of
Directors approved and is recommending to the shareholders an amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation of the Company limiting the right of shareholders to
call a special shareholders' meeting by requiring a written request signed by
the holders of no less than 66 2/3% of the total voting power of the Company to
call such a meeting.
Advantages/Disadvantages
For information concerning the advantages and disadvantages of Section 2.2
of the by-laws, and the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to
require a Super Majority Vote to amend, alter or repeal Section 2.2, see
"Proposal 3 -- Part(b) -- Shareholder Right to Call a Special Meeting".
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE SUPER MAJORITY VOTE
AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION DESCRIBED IN PROPOSAL 2.
21
<PAGE> 24
PROPOSAL 3 -- AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION REGARDING SHAREHOLDER ACTION
BY WRITTEN CONSENT, SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO CALL SPECIAL
MEETINGS AND DIRECTOR'S RIGHT TO GIVE PROXY
Proposal 3 has three parts: Part (a) -- Shareholder Action by Written
Consent; Part (b) -- Shareholders' Right to Call Special Meetings; and Part
(c) -- Director's Right to Give Proxy. Shareholders may vote for, against or
abstain from voting with respect to each of the three parts of Proposal 3, and
need not vote or abstain consistently with respect to such parts. This Proposal
3 will become effective only if approved by the shareholders of the Company.
PART (A) -- SHAREHOLDER ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT
General
The Board of Directors has approved and is recommending to the shareholders
an amendment to Article XII of the Company's Articles of Incorporation
eliminating the right of shareholders to take action by written consent.
Presently, Article XII provides that any corporate action requiring or
permitting a shareholder vote may be taken by the written consent of
shareholders having not less than a majority of the shares entitled to vote upon
the action if a meeting were held. The LBCL permits shareholder action by
written consent of all shareholders having voting power on the issue, but allows
the Articles of Incorporation to provide that a written consent of shareholders
may be signed by a lesser specified percentage. The proposal would eliminate
shareholder action by written consent by amending Article XII to provide the
shareholder action may be taken only at an Annual or Special Meeting of
shareholders. Further, the proposed amendment would require a Super Majority
Vote to amend, alter or repeal Article XII.
Advantages
Eliminating shareholder action by written consent would, to the extent that
the provisions of the Company's Rights Plan are inapplicable or invalid, force
consideration of a shareholder proposal at a duly called shareholders' meeting,
which would require that advance notice regarding the proposal, together with
written proxy materials analyzing the pros and cons of the proposal, be sent to
all shareholders from whom proxies are to be solicited. This would increase the
amount and level of debate over the proposal and would allow all shareholders to
be heard. It would also provide the Company's Board of Directors with an
opportunity to convey to shareholders its views regarding the proposal, as well
as to take any other actions regarding the proposal that it believes are in the
best interests of the Company, its shareholders and corporate constituencies.
Disadvantages
Elimination of the right of shareholders to act by written consent forces
shareholders of the Company who have the requisite power to act to go through
the unnecessary time and expense of calling and holding a meeting of
shareholders to take action that the shareholders propose to take. Moreover, the
combination of this proposal and the proposal to limit the right of shareholders
to call a special meeting of shareholders would mean that shareholders generally
will be able to vote on the direction of the Company only once a year at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
PART (B) -- SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO CALL SPECIAL MEETING
General
The Board of Directors has approved and is recommending an amendment to
Article XII of the Company's Articles of Incorporation to provide that
shareholders may call a special shareholders' meeting, but only by a written
request signed by the holders of no less than 66 2/3% of the total voting power
of the Company. The proposed amendment would also require a Super Majority Vote
to amend, alter or repeal Article XII. Presently, the Articles of Incorporation
contain no provision regarding the shareholders' right to call meetings and
Section 2.2 of the Company's by-laws merely provides that special shareholders'
meetings may be called
22
<PAGE> 25
by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or by resolution
adopted by 66 2/3% of the entire board. However, the LBCL provides, that unless
the Articles or by-laws provide otherwise, shareholders holding 20% of the
voting power may call a special meeting. Thus, if the shareholders do not
approve the proposed amendment, shareholders of the Company holding 20% or more
of the Company's Common Stock could call a special shareholders' meeting.
Advantages
Requiring 66 2/3% of the total voting power of the Company's shareholders
to call a Special Meeting would make it more difficult for a dissident group of
shareholders or a takeover bidder to force consideration of a shareholder
proposal at a Special Meeting rather than at the next Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Special Meetings of Shareholders require considerable management
time and expense and can become very disruptive to the normal operations of the
Company.
Disadvantages
Requiring such a large percentage of the total voting power of the Company
to call a special shareholders' meeting will mean that, unless the larger
percentage is obtained, shareholders will generally be able to vote to change
the direction of the Company only once a year at the annual meeting of
shareholders, even if a substantial percentage of shareholders believe such an
earlier change would be beneficial to the shareholders. Accordingly, the
proposed amendment would tend to perpetuate the control of the Company's
incumbent directors and management.
PART (C) -- DIRECTOR'S RIGHT TO GIVE PROXY
General
The Board of Directors has approved and is recommending to the shareholders
an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation to delete Section 3 of
Article V, which presently provides that any director absent from any meeting of
the Board of Directors or any committee thereof may be represented by another
director or a shareholder who may cast the absent director's vote by proxy. The
LBCL provides for the right of a director to give a proxy to another director or
to a shareholder, but also provides that, in the absence of any such provision
in the articles, no director shall have a right to vote by proxy.
Advantages
Eliminating the right of a director to vote by proxy prevents the
possibility that a takeover bidder or dissident shareholder could, through the
use of coercive threats or economic incentives, convince a group of directors
not to attend a scheduled meeting of the Company's Board of Directors and,
instead, give their proxies to the takeover bidder or dissident shareholder to
vote at such meeting.
Disadvantages
The principal disadvantage of the proposed amendment is that it would
eliminate the ability of a director to vote on matters to be voted upon at a
meeting at which such director cannot, due to legitimate reasons, be present in
person or by conference telephone, and thus could disenfranchise a director in
such instances.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENTS TO THE
COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION DESCRIBED IN PROPOSAL 3.
23
<PAGE> 26
PROPOSAL 4 -- AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPANY'S 1993 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
The Board of Directors is recommending for approval by the shareholders an
amendment to the United Companies Financial Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive
Plan (the "1993 Plan") that allows the award of restricted stock to participants
thereunder. The discussion herein of the proposal is qualified in its entirety
by the complete text of the proposed amendment to the 1993 Plan, which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "C".
The 1993 Plan was approved by the shareholders on April 28, 1994, and
automatically terminates on July 22, 2003, ten years following the date of
adoption by the Board of Directors. The persons eligible to participate in the
1993 Plan are those officers, key employees of and consultants to the Company
and its subsidiaries as may be designated from time to time by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee"), which acts as
administrator for the 1993 Plan.
Presently, the 1993 Plan allows the award to participants of options to
purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock. The options may be either options
intended to qualify as incentive stock options ("ISO's") under Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and those not
intended by the Committee to be ISO's. The aggregate number of shares of Common
Stock subject to award under the 1993 Plan is 660,000 shares, approximately 4.8%
of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 31, 1995. The maximum
number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan is subject to
adjustment in the event of a stock dividend, split or combination or to reflect
a merger, capitalization or other change in the capital structure of or by the
Company. Currently outstanding under the 1993 Plan are options to purchase an
aggregate of 288,308 shares of Common Stock at an average exercise price of
$15.91 per share. The Board of Directors may suspend or discontinue the 1993
Plan or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever, with the exception of
certain circumstances where the 1993 Plan provisions require shareholder
approval.
Generally, the proposed amendment would grant the Committee the authority
to award shares of restricted stock to participants under the 1993 Plan
presently within the class of persons eligible to receive stock options. The
shares of such restricted stock shall be awarded from the shares of Common Stock
previously reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan. The maximum number of
shares that may be awarded under the 1993 Plan to any individual participant in
any calendar year is 30,000 shares.
The shares of restricted stock awarded shall be subject to a restriction
period (the "Restriction Period") established by the Committee, in its
discretion, but in no event shall the Restriction Period be for a period less
than six months. The Committee, in its discretion, may also award shares of
restricted stock that are contingent upon the attainment by the Company of
certain performance levels during the Restriction Period. However, the proposed
amendment provides that any performance conditions attached to the award by the
Committee must be tied to the Company's return on equity. The Committee has the
discretion to establish the minimum return on equity that must be met at the end
of a certain period for that condition of the award to be fulfilled, except that
in no event may the performance level set by the Committee be less than a 10%
return on equity. Before any performance condition is considered as fulfilled,
the Committee must certify that the specified return on equity has been met by
the Company.
During the Restriction Period, the shares may not be sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of. During the Restriction Period,
the certificates representing the shares, which shall be registered in the name
of the participant, shall be deposited with the Company until such time as the
shares vest. Notwithstanding the Restriction Period, but still subject to any
performance-based conditions applicable to the award, the shares shall
immediately vest upon the death, disability or retirement (on or after his or
her normal retirement date) of the participant. Participants receiving shares of
restricted stock shall be entitled to dividend and voting rights even though the
shares have not vested. Shares of restricted stock shall be entirely forfeited
by the participant if, (i) during the Restriction Period, the participant
breaches any terms or conditions set forth in the 1993 Plan or the participant
resigns from the Company (before his or her normal retirement date and other
than in the case of disability) or is terminated by the Company; or (ii) any
performance-based conditions imposed upon the award have not been met.
24
<PAGE> 27
Since the date upon which the Committee approved the amendment of the 1993
Plan to allow awards of restricted stock, effective February 23, 1995, the
following awards of restricted stock have been made to the persons and groups
described in the table below, subject to the approval of the amendment to the
1993 Plan by the shareholders at the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If the
amendment to the 1993 Plan is not approved by the shareholders at the 1995
Annual Meeting, all of the awards included in the table below will be forfeited.
NEW PLAN BENEFITS PURSUANT TO THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE 1993 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES OF
NAME RESTRICTED STOCK
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------
<S> <C>
J. Terrell Brown.................................................... 9,500
W. Roger Clark...................................................... 5,000
John D. Dienes...................................................... 6,500
Dale E. Redman...................................................... 6,500
Robert B. Thomas, Jr................................................ 5,000
Non-Executive Officers and Employees Group.......................... -0-
</TABLE>
Each of the foregoing awards will vest in 50% increments on February 23, 1996,
and February 23, 1997, respectively, subject to the condition that the Company's
return on equity for each of the years ended December 31, 1995, and December 31,
1996, is at least 10%.
The proposed amendment to the 1993 Plan is being submitted for shareholder
approval based upon the application of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act") to transactions in the Company's Common
Stock by its directors and certain officers (the "insiders"). Section 16(b)
provides that any profit resulting from a purchase and sale or sale and purchase
of the Company's Common Stock by an insider within a period of less than six
months must be remitted to the Company. Unless an exception from Section 16(b)
is available, an acquisition of shares of restricted stock under the amended
1993 Plan may subject an insider to Section 16(b) liability. Acquisition of
shares of restricted stock under the proposed amendment to the 1993 Plan will be
exempt from Section 16(b) liability if the requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the
1934 Act are met. One of the requirements of Rule 16b-3 is that any material
amendment (such as the proposed amendment) be approved by the Company's
shareholders. Unless the proposed amendment is approved by the shareholders, an
insider receiving shares of restricted stock under the 1993 Plan may be
subjected, in certain circumstances, to Section 16(b) liability.
The Company believes that the proposed amendment is desirable because it
allows the Company the ability to award compensation to executives and key
employees that is equity-based, and that, if the Committee so determines, is
tied to the Company's performance. Such awards should facilitate the alignment
of the interests of management with the long-term interests of the Company and
its shareholders.
Approval of the amendment of the 1993 Plan requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented
at the 1995 Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
AMENDMENT TO THE 1993 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.
25
<PAGE> 28
PROPOSAL 5 -- AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
The Board of Directors is recommending an amendment to the United Companies
Financial Corporation Management Incentive Plan (the "Management Incentive Plan"
or for the purposes of this section, the "Plan") for approval by the
shareholders that will allow a participant in the Plan to elect to receive all
or part of the bonus, otherwise payable thereunder in cash, in shares of the
Company's Common Stock. The following discussion of the proposed amendment is
qualified in its entirety by the complete text of the proposed amendment
attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
The Management Incentive Plan presently provides for the award to
executives and certain key employees of the Company of cash compensation in
addition to base salary for achievement by the Company of financial objectives
based on return on equity during the year. The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors (the "Committee") administers the Management Incentive Plan
and has the authority to interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan, to
designate key employees who shall be eligible to participate in the Plan and to
determine a threshold level of Company performance to be achieved in order for a
fund to be established (the "bonus pool") and for any awards to be paid. The
Board of Directors may amend the Management Incentive Plan as it deems advisable
except in certain circumstances where the shareholders must approve an
amendment. The Management Incentive Plan requires a minimum return on equity of
10% for the establishment of the bonus pool available for awards thereunder. The
allocation of the bonus pool at or above the threshold return on equity will be
determined by the Committee; however, awards may not exceed and funding is
capped at 10% of after tax net income. Plan participants are assigned to one of
five eligibility levels based on such participants' contribution to and impact
on the success of the overall organization. 102 individuals received awards
under the Management Incentive Plan in 1994. Prior to the payment of any award
under the Plan, the Committee must certify in writing that the performance goals
and all applicable conditions have been met.
The proposed amendment to the Management Incentive Plan would provide each
participant with the right to elect to receive all or part of the award
otherwise payable in cash, to shares of Common Stock. Any such election must be
made in writing and delivered to the Committee no later than six months and one
day prior to December 31st of the plan year for which the participant chooses to
make the election. Once the election is submitted by the participant, it may not
be revoked or changed. If a participant so elects to receive Common Stock in
lieu of cash, the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued shall equal the
amount designated by the participant to be delivered in Common Stock, expressed
as a percentage of the total award (which amount shall be calculated by
multiplying the percentage provided by the participant by the total amount of
the cash award) divided by the fair market value (determined in accordance with
the provisions of the Plan), of a share of the Company's Common Stock on
December 31st of the plan year for which the election is made.
Further, under the proposed amendment, if an executive officer of the
Company elects to receive all or part of their award in shares of Common Stock,
the Committee has the discretion to place certain restrictions and conditions
upon the Common Stock, including restriction periods and performance-based
conditions. However, the proposed amendment further provides that any
performance-based conditions imposed upon the vesting of such shares shall be
based upon the Company's return on equity, and that the minimum return on equity
that may be established by the Committee as a condition shall be no less than
10% for any annual period. Finally, if applicable, the Committee must certify
that any such performance-based conditions have been met.
Pursuant to the proposed amendment, the Board of Directors has reserved
300,000 shares of the Company's authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock
for issuance under the Management Incentive Plan. If the shareholders approve
the proposed amendment, the Company intends to prepare and file a Registration
Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC, to register the shares reserved for issuance
under the Plan.
26
<PAGE> 29
The Committee has not received any elections pursuant to the Management
Incentive Plan and if it does, the elections will not be effective unless the
shareholders approve the proposed amendment at the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. The table below reflects the cash awards made to the persons and
groups described therein pursuant to the Management Incentive Plan for the plan
year ended December 31, 1994.
1994 PLAN BENEFITS UNDER THE
COMPANY'S MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AMOUNT
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
<S> <C>
J. Terrell Brown......................................................... $ 297,205
W. Roger Clark........................................................... 136,094
John D. Dienes........................................................... 200,138
Dale E. Redman........................................................... 189,131
Robert B. Thomas, Jr..................................................... 168,116
Non-executive Officer & Employee Group................................... 1,568,024
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) On December 31, 1994, the fair market value (as determined in accordance
with the terms of the Management Incentive Plan, as amended) of a share of
the Common Stock of the Company was $27.125.
The purpose of submitting the proposed amendment to the Management
Incentive Plan for shareholder approval is to avoid the operation of Section
16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act"), if
certain officers (the "insiders") of the Company elect to receive Common Stock
in lieu of cash under the plan. Section 16(b) provides that any profit resulting
from a purchase and sale or a sale and purchase by an insider during a period of
less than six months must be remitted to the Company. Unless an exemption from
Section 16(b) is available, the receipt by a insider of Common Stock under the
Incentive Plan may result in liability under Section 16(b). Acquisition of
shares of Common Stock under the Incentive Plan will be exempt from Section
16(b) liability if the requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the 1934 Act are met.
One of the requirements of Rule 16b-3 is that the plan and any material
amendments thereto be approved by the shareholders. Unless the proposed
amendment to the Management Incentive Plan is approved by the shareholders, an
insider receiving shares of Common Stock under the plan is exposed to potential
Section 16(b) liability.
The Company believes that the proposed amendment is desirable because it
allows participants to increase their equity interest in the Company by electing
to receive Common Stock rather than cash under the Plan. Equity ownership in the
Company by its employees should facilitate the alignment of the interests of
such persons with the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Further, the amendment is advantageous to the Company to the extent it
positively affects the Company's liquidity.
Approval of the amendment to the Management Incentive Plan requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock
present or represented at the Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
AMENDMENT TO THE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires
the Company's directors and certain officers and persons who own more than ten
percent of the Company's Common Stock to file with the SEC reports of ownership
and changes in ownership of the Common Stock. Directors, certain officers and
greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required by applicable
regulations to furnish the Company with all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to the
Company, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Form
5 reports were required to be filed, the Company
27
<PAGE> 30
believes that, during the 1994 fiscal year, all filing requirements applicable
to its directors and certain officers were complied with except the late filing
in September, 1994, by Robert B. Thomas, Jr., of a Form 4 report with respect to
his acquisition in May, 1994, of 500 shares of Common Stock.
AUDITOR SERVICES
The Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 1994 were audited by the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP and such firm will
remain as the Company's auditors until replaced by the Board of Directors. A
representative of such firm will be present at the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to respond to any appropriate questions and will have the
opportunity to make a statement, if he so desires.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any shareholder's proposal to be considered by the Company for inclusion in
the 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders proxy material must be submitted in
accordance with applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and received by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than
January 1, 1996.
In order for a shareholder to bring any business or nominations before the
1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, certain conditions set forth in Section 2.8
and Subsection 4.9.2 of the by-laws of the Company, as amended by the Board of
Directors on January 31, 1995, must be complied with, including, but not limited
to, the delivery of a notice to the Secretary of the Company not less than 60
days in advance of the 1995 Annual Meeting, or if fewer than 70 days notice or
prior disclosure of the date of the 1995 Annual Meeting is given or made to the
shareholders, not later than the tenth day following the day on which the notice
at the date of the 1995 Annual Meeting was mailed or such prior disclosure was
made. The requirements as to the form and content of such advance notice are set
forth in Section 2.8 and Subsection 4.9.2 of the Company's by-laws, the full
text of which is provided as part of Exhibit "B" attached to this proxy
statement. See also "Proposal 2 -- Part (c) -- Shareholder Nominations and
Proposals."
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters which may be properly, or
are likely to be, brought before the meeting. However, if any proper matters are
brought before the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy will vote
thereon as the Board of Directors recommends.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
SHERRY E. ANDERSON,
Secretary
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
May 1, 1995
28
<PAGE> 31
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED COMPANIES
FINANCIAL CORPORATION ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
For the purpose of (i) eliminating the right of a director, absent from any
meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof, to be represented
thereat by another director or by a shareholder; (ii) requiring the affirmative
vote of the holders of no less than 80% of the total voting power of all shares
of United Companies Financial Corporation (the "Corporation") to amend, alter,
change, waive or repeal, directly or indirectly, or to adopt any provision
inconsistent with, certain provisions of the Corporation's by-laws, as amended
by the Board of Directors on, and effective as of, January 31, 1995; (iii)
eliminating the right of shareholders to act by written consent, and requiring a
written request signed by the holders of no less than 66 2/3% of the total
voting power of all shares of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors, voting together as a single class, to call a special
meeting of shareholders; and (iv) requiring the affirmative vote of the holders
of no less than 80% of the total voting power of all shares of the Corporation
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a
single class, to amend, alter, change, waive or repeal, directly or indirectly,
or to adopt any provision inconsistent with, any provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation that are being amended, the Corporation's Articles of
Incorporation are hereby amended as follows:
1. Existing Section 3 of Article V is hereby deleted in its entirety.
2. Existing Section 4 of Article V is hereby redesignated as Section 3 of
Article V and such Section is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:
"ARTICLE V
* * *
Section 3. The by-laws of the Corporation may be made, altered,
amended, changed, waived or repealed, and new by-laws may be adopted, by
the Board of Directors at any regular or special meeting by the affirmative
vote of a majority of those directors present at any meeting of the
directors; subject, however, to the right of the shareholders to alter,
amend, change, waive or repeal any by-laws made or amended by the
directors. The by-laws may contain any provision relating to the business
of the Corporation, the conduct of its affairs, its rights or powers, or
the rights or powers of its shareholders, directors or officers, not
inconsistent with law or these Articles of Incorporation, as heretofore or
hereafter amended. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.8,
4.1, 4.13 and 4.16 and Subsection 4.9.2 of the Corporation's by-laws, as
amended by the Board of Directors on and effective as of January 31, 1995,
may not be amended, altered, changed, waived or repealed, directly or
indirectly, nor may any provision inconsistent with such Sections be
adopted, except by the affirmative vote of the holders of no less than 80%
of the total voting power of all shares of the Corporation entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
Further, any other provisions of these Articles of Incorporation or the
by-laws notwithstanding (and in addition to any other vote that may be
required by law, these Articles of Incorporation or the by-laws), there
shall be required to amend, alter, change, waive or repeal, directly or
indirectly, or to adopt any provision inconsistent with, this Section 3 of
Article V the affirmative vote of the holders of no less than 80% of the
total voting power of all shares of the Corporation entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class."
A-1
<PAGE> 32
3. Article XII is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"ARTICLE XII
No action shall be taken by the shareholders of the Corporation except
at an annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation. A
special meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation may be called by the
shareholders, but only by a written request therefor, stating the purpose
or purposes thereof, delivered to the secretary of the Corporation and
signed by the holders of no less than 66 2/3% of the total voting power of
all shares of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single class. Notwithstanding any other
provision of these Articles of Incorporation or the by-laws (and in
addition to any other vote that may be required by law, these Articles of
Incorporation or the by-laws), there shall be required to amend, alter,
change, waive or repeal, directly or indirectly, or to adopt any provision
inconsistent with, this Article XII the affirmative vote of the holders of
no less than 80% of the total voting power of all shares of the Corporation
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as
a single class."
A-2
<PAGE> 33
EXHIBIT B
PROVISIONS OF THE BY-LAWS OF UNITED COMPANIES
FINANCIAL CORPORATION SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSED SUPER MAJORITY
VOTE AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
2.2 Special Meeting of Shareholders. Except as provided in the Articles, a
special meeting of the shareholders may be called for any purpose or purposes at
any time by the chairman of the board or the chief executive officer of the
Corporation, or by resolution of the board of directors duly adopted by a vote
of no less than sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the entire board
of directors. (As amended January 31, 1995, to be effective as of January 31,
1995)
2.3 Presiding Officer. The chairman of the board or in his absence one of
the vice-chairmen, and in their absence the chief executive officer of the
Corporation shall preside at all meetings of the shareholders. Notwithstanding
anything in these by-laws to the contrary, no business shall be conducted at any
meeting of the shareholders except in accordance with the procedures set forth
in these by-laws, including but not limited to the procedures for the submission
of shareholder proposals and shareholder nominations of directors pursuant to
Section 2.8 and Subsection 4.9.2, respectively. The presiding officer of any
meeting of the shareholders shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare
to the meeting that business or nominations were not properly brought before the
meeting in accordance with these by-laws, including but not limited to Section
2.8 and Subsection 4.9.2, respectively, and if he should so determine, he shall
so declare to the meeting and any such business or nominations not properly
brought before the meeting shall not be transacted and shall not be submitted
for consideration at the meeting. (As amended January 31, 1995, to be effective
as of January 31, 1995)
2.8 Shareholder Proposals. Any proposal by a shareholder submitted for
consideration at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders of the
Corporation must be timely delivered in the proper written form to the secretary
of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder's proposal shall be delivered to
or mailed and received at the Corporation's principal offices at least sixty
(60) days prior to the annual or special meeting at which the proposal is to be
considered (or, if fewer than seventy (70) days notice or prior public
disclosure of the meeting date is given or made to the shareholders, not later
than the tenth day following the day on which the notice of the date of the
meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made). To be in proper written
form, such shareholder proposal shall set forth in writing (i) the name and
address, as they appear on the Corporation's books, of the shareholder
submitting the proposal, (ii) the number of shares beneficially owned by the
shareholder, (iii) a brief description of the proposal, (iv) the reason(s) for
submitting the proposal, (v) any material interest of the shareholder in the
proposal, (vi) a representation by the shareholder that the shareholder will
attend the meeting to move consideration of the proposal, and (vii) a
representation by the shareholder that the shareholder will remain a shareholder
of record through the record date of the meeting. (As amended January 31, 1995,
to be effective as of January 31, 1995)
4.1 Number of Directors, Election and Term. Except as otherwise provided
pursuant to the provisions of Article III of the Articles relating to the rights
of the holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the
common stock as to dividends or upon liquidation to elect additional directors
under specified circumstances, the number of directors shall be fixed
exclusively from time to time by resolution duly adopted by a vote of no less
than sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the entire board of
directors. At the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the directors shall be
divided into three (3) classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, as
determined by the board of directors, with the term of office of the first class
to expire at the 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the term of office of the
second class to expire at the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and the term
of office of the third class to expire at the 1998 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, with the members of each class to hold office until their
successors are elected and qualified. At each annual meeting of the shareholders
following the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the successors of the class
of directors whose term expires at such annual meeting of the shareholders shall
be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of the
shareholders held in the third year following the year of their election, with
each director in each such class to hold office until his or her successor is
elected and qualified. (As amended January 31, 1995, to be effective as of
January 31, 1995)
B-1
<PAGE> 34
4.9.2 By shareholders. Any nomination by a shareholder for election to the
board of directors at any annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation
must be timely delivered in the proper written form to the secretary of the
Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder's nomination shall be delivered to or
mailed and received at the Corporation's principal offices at least sixty (60)
days prior to the annual meeting at which the nomination is to be considered
(or, if fewer than seventy (70) days notice or prior public disclosure of the
meeting date is given or made to the shareholders, not later than the tenth day
following the day on which the notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or
such public disclosure was made). To be in proper written form, the
shareholder's nomination(s) shall set forth in writing (a) as to each person
whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a
director, all information relating to such person that is required to be
disclosed in solicitation of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise
required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, including but not limited to such person's written
consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a
director, if elected; and (b) as to the shareholder proposing the nomination(s),
(i) the name and address, as they appear on the Corporation's books, of the
shareholder, (ii) the number of shares beneficially owned by the shareholder,
(iii) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the
shareholder and each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate and any
other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the
nomination or nominations are to be made by the shareholder, (iv) a
representation by the shareholder that the shareholder will attend the meeting
to move consideration of the nomination(s), and (v) a representation by the
shareholder that the shareholder will remain a shareholder of record through the
record date of the meeting. (As amended January 31, 1995, to be effective as of
January 31, 1995)
4.13 Vacancies. Newly created directorships resulting from any increase in
the authorized number of directors or any vacancies in the board of directors
resulting from death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from
office or other cause shall be filled exclusively by a vote of no less than
sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the remaining directors, even
though the remaining directors may not constitute a quorum, at any regular or
special board of directors meeting. Any director elected in accordance with the
preceding sentence shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the
class of directors in which the new directorship was created and the vacancy
occurred and until such director's successor is elected and qualified. (As
amended January 31, 1995, to be effective as of January 31, 1995)
4.16 Removal. Except as otherwise provided pursuant to the provisions of
Article III of the Articles relating to the rights of the holders of any class
or series of stock having a preference over the common stock as to dividends or
upon liquidation to elect additional directors under specified circumstances,
any director may be removed from office at any time, with or without cause, only
by the affirmative vote of the holders of no less than eighty percent (80%) of
the total voting power of all shares of the Corporation entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. (As
amended January 31, 1995, to be effective as of January 31, 1995)
B-2
<PAGE> 35
EXHIBIT C
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED COMPANIES FINANCIAL
CORPORATION 1993 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
In order to provide an additional type of award that may be made pursuant
to United Companies Financial Corporation's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the
"1993"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1. The last sentence of Section 1.01 is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
"To this end the Company may from time to time (i) grant options under
the Plan to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company, par value
$2.00; and (ii) make awards of shares of restricted stock, on the terms
and conditions hereafter established."
2. Section 1.02 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"1.02 ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee (the
"Committee") of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board of
Directors") or such other committee appointed by the Board of Directors
from time to time. The Committee shall consist of not less than 3
members of the Board of Directors each of whom shall be a "disinterested
person" as defined in Rule 16b-3 (or any successor provision)
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actions approved
by a majority of the members of the Committee shall be the valid acts of
the Committee. No director while a member of the Committee shall be
eligible to receive an award under the Plan. The Committee shall have
full authority to act in selecting the persons eligible to participate
in the Plan, in determining the amount and terms of the awards made to
each, subject to the limitations in Articles II, III and IV and the
terms and conditions of the awards, in interpreting the Plan, in
adopting, amending and rescinding rules and regulations relating to the
Plan, and in making all other determinations and taking all other action
necessary or advisable for the implementation and administration of the
Plan.
The interpretation and construction by the Committee of any
provisions of the Plan or of any award made under it, and all actions
taken by the Committee, shall be final, binding and conclusive on the
Company, its shareholders, the Subsidiaries, all recipients of awards
hereunder, their respective legal representatives, successors and
assigns and upon all other person claiming under or through any of them.
Members of the Board of Directors, the Committee and officers and
employees of the Company who may take actions relating to the Plan shall
not be liable for any action or determination made in good faith upon
the advice of counsel with respect to the Plan or any award made under
it, and shall incur no liability except for gross negligence or willful
misconduct in the performance of their duties."
3. Section 1.04 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"1.04 TYPES OF AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN
Awards under the Plan may be in the form of any one or more of the
following: (i) Stock Options as described in Article II, (ii) Incentive
Stock Options, as described in Article III, or (iii) Restricted Stock,
as described in Article IV."
4. Section 1.05 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"1.05 AGGREGATE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
The stock subject to the awards hereunder shall be shares of the
Company's authorized but unissued or reacquired $2 par value common
stock, hereafter sometimes called the "Common Stock". The aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued as awards pursuant
to the Plan shall not exceed 660,000 (after giving effect to the 100%
Common Stock dividend paid on October 18, 1993 and the 10% Common Stock
dividend paid on January 10, 1995). The
C-1
<PAGE> 36
limitations established by the preceding sentence shall be subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 5.01 of the Plan. Any shares of Common
Stock subject to an award made under the Plan which for any reason is
terminated, forfeited, unexercised, or expires shall again be available
for issuance under the Plan."
5. New Article IV is added to read in its entirety as follows:
"ARTICLE IV -- RESTRICTED STOCK
4.01 AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK
The Committee may from time to time, and subject to the provisions
of the Plan and such other terms and conditions as the Committee may
prescribe, award to any participant in the Plan shares of Common Stock
("Restricted Stock"). Shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan
shall be subject to such restriction period (the "Restriction Period")
as the Committee in its discretion may determine. Notwithstanding the
forgoing, in no event shall the Restriction Period be less than six
months.
4.02 RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENTS
The award of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by a written
restricted stock agreement, executed by the Company and the holder of
the Restricted Stock, stating the number of shares of Restricted Stock
subject to the award, the applicable Restriction Period, and in such
form, and with such other terms and conditions not inconsistent with the
provisions of the Plan, as the Committee may from time to time determine
in its discretion.
4.03 PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
The Committee may, in its discretion, make any award of Restricted
Stock under the Plan subject to certain performance-based conditions.
However, any performance-based conditions that may be imposed by the
Committee shall be based upon the Company's attainment of a minimum
return on equity during the Restriction Period. In no event, however,
may the Committee establish as a minimum return on equity of the Company
of less than 10% for any year of the Company. For the purpose of this
Section 4.03, 'return on equity' shall mean the return on equity of the
Company for the specified period, computed on a consolidated basis in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Before any
performance-based condition will be considered as fulfilled, the
Committee must certify that such condition has been met by the Company.
Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 5.01 of the Plan, the maximum
number of shares of Restricted Stock that may be awarded to any
individual participant during a calendar year shall be 30,000 shares.
4.04 RESTRICTIONS AND FORFEITURES
(a) During the Restriction Period, and unless and until any
performance-based conditions upon the award of Restricted Stock have
been met, the shares of Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned,
transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of or encumbered, either
voluntarily or involuntarily.
(b) Participants receiving awards of Restricted Stock shall be entitled
to dividend and voting rights for the shares, even though they are
not vested, provided that such rights shall terminate immediately as
to any forfeited shares of Restricted Stock.
(c) The shares of Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by a stock
certificate registered only in the name of the participant, which
stock certificate shall be held by the Company until the Restricted
Stock has fully vested.
C-2
<PAGE> 37
(d) Notwithstanding the Restriction Period, but still subject to any
performance-based conditions that may be imposed upon the award, the
occurrence of any of the following events shall cause the immediate
vesting of the shares of Restricted Stock:
(i) the death of the participant;
(ii) the retirement of the participant on or after the participant's
normal retirement date;
(iii) the disability of the participant. For the purposes of this
Subsection, the term "disability" shall be defined as such term
is defined in Subsection 2.06(c) of the Plan.
(e) Shares of Restricted Stock shall be entirely forfeited by the
participant in the event that (i) during the Restriction Period, the
participant breaches any terms or conditions of the Plan or the
participant resigns from or is terminated by the Company; or (ii) any
performance-based conditions imposed upon an award are not met.
4.05 LEGEND ON CERTIFICATES
Each certificate evidencing shares of Restricted Stock awarded
pursuant to the Plan shall be evidenced by a certificate bearing the
following (or a similar) legend:
'The transferability of this certificate and the shares of
stock represented hereby are subject to the terms and
conditions (including forfeiture) contained in the United
Companies Financial Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plan and
a Restricted Stock Agreement entered into between the owner
and United Companies Financial Corporation. Copies of such
Plan and Agreement are on file in the office of the Secretary
of United Companies Financial Corporation, 4041 Essen Lane,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809.'
6. Present Article IV of the Plan is redesignated as Article V, and each
Section thereunder shall be renumbered accordingly.
7. Section 5.01, as renumbered, is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows:
"5.01 RECAPITALIZATION
Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company,
the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each Stock Option or
Incentive Stock Option (collectively for purposes of this Article V, an
"Option"), the exercise price per share thereof for each such Option,
and the number of shares of Common Stock awarded as Restricted Stock
under Article IV hereof, shall be proportionately adjusted for any
increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock of
the Company resulting from a subdivision or consolidation of shares or
the payment of a stock dividend (but only on the Common Stock) or any
other increase or decrease in the number of such shares effected without
receipt of consideration by the Company.
In the event of a merger, consolidation, combination, exchange of
shares, separation, reorganization, or liquidation of the Company, each
outstanding Option or share of Restricted Stock shall pertain to and
apply to the securities to which a holder of the number of shares of
Common Stock subject to the Option or award as Restricted Stock would
have been entitled.
In the event of a change in the Common Stock of the Company as
presently constituted, which is limited to a change of all of its
authorized shares with par value into the same number of shares with a
different par value or without par value, the shares resulting from any
such change shall be deemed to be Common Stock within the meaning of the
Plan.
To the extent that the foregoing adjustments relate to stock or
securities of the Company, such adjustments shall be made by the
Committee, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding
and conclusive, provided that each Incentive Stock Option granted
pursuant to this Plan shall not be adjusted in a manner that causes the
Incentive Stock Option to fail to qualify as an "incentive stock option"
within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.
C-3
<PAGE> 38
Any award made pursuant to the Plan shall not affect in any way the
right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassification,
reorganizations or changes of its capital or business structure or to
merge or to consolidate or to dissolve, liquidate or sell, or transfer
all or any part of its business or assets."
8. Sections 5.05 and 5.06, as renumbered, are hereby amended to delete
the words "Option" and "Options" used therein and to substitute therefor
the words "award" or "awards", respectively.
9. Section 5.10, as renumbered, is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows:
"5.10 GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
The Plan, the granting and exercise of Options and the award of
Restricted Stock thereunder, and the obligations of the Company to sell
and deliver shares under such Options, shall be subject to all
applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any
governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be
required. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary,
Options shall be granted and exercised and Restricted Stock shall be
awarded in such a manner as to conform to the provisions of Rule 16b-3,
or any replacement rule, adopted pursuant to the provisions of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as the same now exists or may, from time
to time, be amended."
10. The full text of the Plan is amended to change all references to
"Section 4.01" therein to "Section 5.01".
C-4
<PAGE> 39
EXHIBIT D
PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED COMPANIES
FINANCIAL CORPORATION MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
In order to provide participants in the United Companies Financial
Corporation Management Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") with the right to
elect to receive all or part of the cash bonus otherwise payable thereunder in
shares of the Common Stock, par value $2.00 in United Companies Financial
Corporation, the Incentive Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1. Subsection 3.5 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"3.5 'Committee' shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company comprised of at least two members who are
not employees of the Company and who are not otherwise eligible to
receive an Award under the Plan."
2. Subsection 7.2 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"7.2 Eligibility Level Allocation. The allocation of the Bonus Pool by
level of participation and the maximum Award per Participant shall be
established by the Committee prior to January 1 of the Plan Year. The
Committee shall determine prior to the beginning of each Plan Year
the portion of the Bonus Pool to be allocated to each eligibility
level."
3. Section 8 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"SECTION 8. PAYMENT OF AWARDS
Subject to the Participant's right to elect to receive shares of
the Company's Common Stock, par value of $2.00 per share (the 'Common
Stock') pursuant to Section 9 below, all Awards under the Plan shall be
payable in cash and shall be paid within 120 days of the end of the Plan
Year for which the Award is made. All Award payments under the Plan
shall be subject to such federal and state withholding taxes required by
law at the time of payment."
4. New Section 9 is added to read in its entirety as follows:
"SECTION 9: PARTICIPANTS' RIGHT TO RECEIVE COMMON STOCK
9.1 Election Rights
Each Participant selected to participate in the Plan in accordance
with Section 5.1 may elect to reduce all or part of the Award that would
otherwise be payable under the Plan in cash pursuant to Section 8, to
shares of Common Stock. Any such election shall be in writing and must
be delivered to the Committee no later than six months and one day prior
to December 31st of the Plan Year. Once the election is submitted, it
may not be revoked or changed.
If a Participant so elects to receive shares of Common Stock in
lieu of cash under an Award, there shall be issued to such Participant a
number of shares of Common Stock equal to the percentage of the Award
designated by the Participant to be awarded in shares of Common Stock
(which amount will be calculated by multiplying the percentage elected
by the Participant by the total Award divided by the Fair Market Value
(as defined in Section 9.2 below) of a share of the Company's Common
Stock on December 31st of the Plan Year).
9.2 Fair Market Value
The term 'Fair Market Value' means the fair market value of a share
of Common Stock determined in good faith by the Committee in the
following manner:
a. If the shares of Common Stock are then listed on any national
or regional stock exchange or traded in the over-the-counter
market and prices are quoted in the NASDAQ National Stock
Market, the Fair Market Value shall be the last quoted sales
price of a share of the
D-1
<PAGE> 40
Common Stock on the date in question, or if there are not
reported sales on such date, on the last preceding date on
which sales were reported;
b. If the shares of Common Stock are not so listed or quoted,
then the Fair Market Value shall be the mean between the bid
and ask price quoted by a market maker or other recognized
specialist in the Common Stock at the close of the date in
question; or
c. In the absence of either of the forgoing, the Fair Market
Value shall be determined by the Committee in its absolute
discretion after giving consideration to the book value, the
revenues, the earnings history and the prospects of the
Company in light of market conditions generally.
The Fair Market Value determined in such manner shall be final,
binding and conclusive on all parties.
9.3 Common Stock Subject to Plan
The shares of Common Stock that may be issued hereunder shall be
from the authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock of the Company.
Subject to the provisions of the next succeeding paragraph of this
Section 9.3, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock reserved and
available for issuance hereunder shall not exceed 300,000 shares.
In the event that the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock
are changed into or exchanged for a different kind or number of shares
of stock or securities of the Company as the result of any stock
dividend, stock split, combination of shares, exchange of shares, merger
consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization or other change in the
capital structure of the Company, then the number of shares subject to
the Plan shall be equitably adjusted by the Committee."
9.4 Special Provisions for Executive Officer Participants
If any executive officer of the Company elects to receive all or
part of his or her award in shares of Common Stock, the Committee, in
its discretion, may subject such shares of Common Stock to certain
restrictions or conditions, including restriction periods or
performance-based conditions. However, if the Committee chooses to
impose a performance-based condition upon the vesting of such shares,
the condition shall be linked to Company performance and based upon the
Company's return on equity. However, the Committee shall not establish a
return on equity requirement any less than 10% for any annual period.
Finally, the Committee must certify, before the condition shall be
considered as being fulfilled, that the performance-based condition has
been met by the Company."
5. Sections 9 and 10 are redesignated as Sections 10 and 11 respectively.
6. Section 11 is redesignated as Section 12, Subsections 11.1 and 11.2
are redesignated as Subsections 12.2 and 12.3 respectively and new
Subsection 12.1 is added to read in its entirety as follows:
"SECTION 12: MISCELLANEOUS
12.1 Amendment of the Plan
The Board of Directors may amend the Plan from time to time in its
sole discretion as it deems advisable. However, no amendment shall,
without the approval of the shareholders of the Company, (i) materially
modify the eligibility requirements for participation in the Plan; (ii)
increase, decrease or otherwise alter the aggregate number of shares of
Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan; (iii) materially
increase the benefits accruing to Participants; (iv) remove the
administration of the Plan from the Committee or render members of the
Committee eligible to receive Awards under the Plan. In additional, the
provisions of Section 9 of the Plan may not be amended more than once in
any six month period except to comply with changes in the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, or the rules thereunder."
D-2
<PAGE> 41
UNITED COMPANIES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
THE SOLICITATION OF THIS PROXY IS MADE ON BEHALF
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PROXY
The undersigned hereby appoints J. TERRELL BROWN and DALE E. REDMAN,
and each of them, with full power of substitution, the attorney and proxy of
the undersigned to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of UNITED
COMPANIES FINANCIAL CORPORATION to be held at the United Companies Financial
Corporation Executive Office Building, 4041 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, Louisiana,
at 9:00 a.m. on June 14, 1995, or any postponement or adjournment thereof, and
to vote the stock of the undersigned with all powers the undersigned would
possess if present upon the following matters and upon any other business that
may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment
thereof.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted as specified herein.
If no specification is made, it is the intention of the proxies to vote FOR
proposals 1,2,3,4 and 5.
Please indicate your vote for the election of Directors on the
reverse. The nominees are:
James J. Bailey, III, General Robert H. Barrow (Retired), J. Terrell
Brown, Richard A. Campbell, Harris J. Chustz, Jr., John D. Dienes, Roy G.
Kadair, M.D., Robert D. Kilpatrick, O. Miles Pollard, Jr., Dale E. Redman,
William H. Wright, Jr.,
SEE REVERSE SIDE
<PAGE> 42
PLEASE MARK
[X] YOUR VOTES
LIKE THIS
INSTRUCTIONS: This proxy, signed and dated, must be returned for your shares to
be represented at the Annual Meeting. To vote, please mark the appropriate box
for each proposal in blue or black ink, date and sign this proxy exactly as
your name appear(s) hereon. If stock is held jointly, signature should include
both names. Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians and others signing
in a representative capacity should give their full title. The shares
represented by this proxy will be voted as specified by the shareholder(s). If
no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted FOR proposals (1), (2), (3),
(4) and (5). PLEASE return promptly in the enclosed postage paid envelope.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR PROPOSALS 1,2,3,4 AND 5.
[ ] To vote for all items AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, mark
this box, sign, date and return this proxy. (NO ADDITIONAL VOTE IS
NECESSARY - JUST SIGN, DATE AND RETURN)
(1) Election of eleven directors to three classes of the Board of
Directors:
WITHHOLD
FOR AUTHORITY
to vote for
Individual nominees
listed below
[ ] [ ]
(2) Approval of an 80% vote to amend the following by-laws of United
Companies Financial Corporation as described in the Proxy Statement
dated May 1, 1995:
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
(a) Staggered Board and Number of Directors [ ] [ ] [ ]
(b) Removal of Directors and Filling Vacancies [ ] [ ] [ ]
(c) Shareholder Nominations and Proposals [ ] [ ] [ ]
(d) Right to Call Special Shareholders Meeting [ ] [ ] [ ]
(3) Approval of the following amendments to the Articles of Incorporation
of United Companies Financial Corporation:
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
(a) Shareholder Action by Written Consent [ ] [ ] [ ]
(b) Shareholder Right to Call Special Meetings [ ] [ ] [ ]
(c) Eliminate Director's Right to Give Proxy [ ] [ ] [ ]
(4) Approval of an Amendment to the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan:
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
(5) Approval of an Amendment to the Company's Management Incentive Plan:
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
SIGNATURE____________________ SIGNATURE____________________ DATED________, 1995
NOTE: Please sign this proxy as name(s) appear above and return it promptly in
the envelope provided, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
