<PAGE>
REVOCATION STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_]Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_]Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-
6(e)(2))
[_]Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]Definitive Additional Materials
[_]Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S) 240.14a-12
COMMERCIAL INTERTECH CORP.
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
---------------------------------------------------------------
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[_]$125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c) (1) (ii), 14a-6(i) (1), 14a-6(i) (2) or
Item 22(a) (2) of Schedule 14A.
[_]$500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-
6(i) (3).
[_]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[X]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a) (2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
<PAGE>
/R/[LOGO] Commercial Intertech
--------------------
August 3, 1996
Dear Commercial Intertech Shareholder:
Over the last few weeks, you have undoubtedly received numerous
communications concerning United Dominion's hostile attempt to take over
Commercial Intertech. I am writing to you today to help you understand the
actions your Board of Directors has taken to protect and enhance the value of
your investment and to help you better understand why we believe that
continuing to implement our strategic program is in your best interests.
With this letter are instructions for what you will need to do with respect
to the first shareholder vote in connection with this important matter. Please
read this letter and the instructions carefully before taking any action.
ENHANCED VALUE: SPIN-OFF OF CUNO TO SHAREHOLDERS
First, your Board has taken a critical step forward in its program to unlock
significant shareholder value-- both immediately and over the long term--by
declaring a dividend to Commercial Intertech shareholders of 100 percent of
the common stock of CUNO, our fluid filtration and purification subsidiary.
The spin-off of CUNO is a key component of our strategic program and
fulfills the plan established earlier this year to separate CUNO from
Commercial Intertech. We are doing so in order to unlock the value of this
fast-growing enterprise. CUNO deserves the substantially higher market
valuation commanded by fluid filtration companies, and we believe the
establishment of a separate public trading market for CUNO is the best and
quickest way to make that possible.
The new CUNO shares will be distributed on the basis of one common share of
CUNO for each Commercial Intertech common share held, payable to holders of
record as of the close of business on August 9, 1996. The spinoff will permit
each of the companies to establish compensation plans that relate directly to
the performance of their respective businesses and will allow management of
each company to focus better on the development of their respective
businesses. In addition, CUNO's publicly traded common stock should provide an
attractive currency for growth through future acquisitions.
CUNO is an outstanding company, with a strong record and significant
potential for sustained growth. It has grown steadily over the last five
years: Revenues have increased from $131.0 million in fiscal 1991 to $162.7
million in fiscal 1995, and its operating income has risen from $5.9 million
to $10.8 million over the same period. For the first six months of fiscal 1996
ended April 30, 1996, CUNO posted revenues of $86.1 million, up 11 percent
from $77.3 million in the first six months of 1995, and operating income of
$7.6 million, up 63 percent from $4.7 million in the same 1995 period.
Following the spin-off, Commercial Intertech will concentrate on its core
industrial businesses, which have excellent prospects. Our hydraulic systems
business unit operates 16 manufacturing or assembly facilities in six
countries. It introduced eight new products in fiscal 1995 for markets as
diverse as school bus brake systems and construction equipment. Our building
systems and metal products units operate five production facilities in the
U.S. and Europe. Astron buildings continue to be in high demand around the
world, housing commercial, industrial, and service operations through
innovative structures.
<PAGE>
United Dominion has said we are trying to break up the company as a defense
to its hostile takeover attempt. That's both cynical and false. We have been
working on this plan since early in 1996. Along with strengthening our core
businesses and repurchasing a portion of our shares, the spin-off is an
integral part of our strategic plan to reward shareholders and enhance
business performance at both companies over the long term. In addition, it
will ensure that you--our shareholders--rather than United Dominion, will
realize the full benefits of CUNO's leading position in the worldwide fluid
filtration business and its long-term growth potential. United Dominion, in
its attempts to stop the spin-off, is trying to capture for itself the
anticipated higher stock market valuation for CUNO instead of letting you reap
the value of your investment.
CONSISTENT RESULTS: COMMERCIAL INTERTECH'S PERFORMANCE
Your Board's belief that continuing to implement our strategic plan makes
the most sense for shareholders is founded on, among other things, our history
of delivering strong and consistent financial results.
. We reported record earnings in fiscal 1995.
. We have been profitable for 76 consecutive years.
. We have paid dividends to shareholders for 61 consecutive years.
. We have raised our dividend to shareholders in 7 of the past 10 years and
within the past three years have declared a 3 for 2 stock split.
In its communications to you and in the press, United Dominion has
mischaracterized both its intentions and its treatment of employees. Let us
set the record straight.
FRIENDLY OR UNFRIENDLY: THE REAL STORY
United Dominion would like you to believe it wants to acquire Commercial
Intertech in a friendly transaction. But the facts demonstrate otherwise.
United Dominion proceeded with a hostile tender offer before our Board even
responded to its initial proposal. United Dominion then raised its bid to $30
per share less than two business days later, strongly suggesting that its
first offer was an attempt to buy Commercial Intertech on the cheap. Then
United Dominion attacked us in court with lawsuits designed to prevent us from
taking steps to maximize Commercial Intertech's value for its shareholders.
And then it began a consent solicitation of shareholders attempting to replace
our Board. So much for a "friendly" transaction. We will not be bullied into
shortchanging our shareholders.
WHAT'S BEST FOR EMPLOYEES: THE REAL STORY
United Dominion has said that it has been kind and gentle with employees,
claiming that it retains as many acquired employees "as possible." They
haven't, however, said what as many "as possible" means. Indeed, for more than
10 years United Dominion has been buying, selling, and reorganizing companies,
unsettling workers' lives, and disrupting the communities in which these
companies operate. Consider these facts:
. Last year, United Dominion acquired Flair Corporation, which owns CM Kemp
Manufacturing Company. To date about 100 employees are losing their jobs
as a result of the imminent closing of the Kemp plant in Glen Burnie,
Maryland.
. United Dominion doesn't hesitate to dismantle, reshuffle, or close long-
time operations. In 1990 it closed a steel fabricating plant in Ontario,
Canada, eliminating about 275 jobs.
2
<PAGE>
. According to records of a U.S. government lawsuit against United Dominion
and information obtained from plant employees, about 70 union workers at
Hyster Company's Kewanee, Illinois plant were terminated, the old union
contract was broken, and benefits were sharply reduced when United
Dominion acquired Hyster in 1990.
. United Dominion once had 22,000 employees at 77 factories around the
world, as detailed in an article in the Charlotte Observer, United
Dominion's hometown paper, dated June 12, 1995. The Company now has a
significantly smaller workforce, with 10,666 employees as of the end of
1995. Where are those employees today?
. The above mentioned Charlotte Observer article details William R.
Holland's rise through United Dominion to become CEO and calls him a
"corporate ax." Here is a key passage in its entirety: "Holland, with the
company since 1973, took over as chief executive and corporate ax. He sold
divisions, paid off debt and laid off workers, whacking almost 60 percent
of the work force."
. At this very moment, United Dominion and its partner are closing Smith-
Steelite of Wheatland, PA in an action characterized as " . . . a total
surprise . . ." by a U.S. Steelworkers' representative.
DON'T TENDER OR CONSENT: ACT IN YOUR OWN BEST INTERESTS
You have, or will shortly receive, a blizzard of documents from United
Dominion. There is no need to do anything at this time. United Dominion's move
to try to call a shareholder meeting quickly was an obvious attempt to prevent
the CUNO spin-off from happening and to pressure you to act quickly in order
to be able to carry out its inadequate and unwanted offer to take over your
company. Tendering your shares or voting to allow United Dominion to call an
immediate special shareholders meeting is a vote against your own best
interests. You will set in motion steps to redeem Commercial Intertech's
shareholder rights plan, which is designed to protect your investment from
inadequate offers--precisely like United Dominion's. And you will encourage
United Dominion to continue in its effort to replace your Board with three
handpicked nominees who will negotiate a transaction with themselves--which
directly contradicts the concept of fiduciary duty and enhancement of
shareholder value.
Don't make a hasty decision that jeopardizes your investment in Commercial
Intertech. Please read our proxy materials about our strategic plan. Please
read our materials about CUNO and its prospects. And then decide for yourself
who can best maximize the value of your investment.
OUR ALTERNATIVE: FIGHTING FOR WHAT WE BELIEVE IN
We are determined to fight for the things we believe in--the fact that the
value inherent in Commercial Intertech belongs to you, our shareholders. Your
Board of Directors strongly believes that our company's long-term strategic
plan, including the spin-off of CUNO, is the best way for you to realize value
for your shares.
We will continue to keep you informed. Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
/s/ Paul J. Powers
Paul J. Powers
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
3
