<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996
OR
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
-------------------- -----------------
Commission File Number 0-8725
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
A California Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
94-1572930
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1010 El Camino Real, Suite 210, Menlo Park, California 94025
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(415) 327-7147
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
None
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $10 per share ("Trust Shares")
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----- ------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
No market for Trust Shares currently exists and therefore a market value
for such Trust Shares cannot be determined.
The number of Trust Shares outstanding as of December 31, 1996 was
3,706,845, $10 par value per share.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
PART I
Item 1. Business........................................................ 1
Item 2. Properties...................................................... 7
Item 3. Legal Proceedings............................................... 14
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............. 14
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Trust Shares and Related
Shareholder Matters............................................ 15
Item 6. Selected Financial Data......................................... 17
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations............................ 18
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........ 22
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure............................ 39
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant.................. 39
Item 11. Executive Compensation.......................................... 40
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management..................................................... 40
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.................. 41
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on
Form 8-K....................................................... 42
Signatures................................................................ 43
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
(a) Historical Development of Business:
Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Trust") was organized pursuant
to a Declaration of Trust on April 17, 1963. The Trust is a California
real estate investment trust and qualifies as a real estate investment
trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
("Code").
The Trust's total assets were $46 million at December 31, 1996 and $63
million at December 31, 1995.
(b) Financial Information About Industry Segments:
The Trust is currently involved in only one industry segment--real estate.
The Trust operates and holds for investment, income producing real property
and promissory notes secured by real property. All of these activities are
included in the real estate industry segment. Therefore, all of the
revenues, operating profits and assets reported in the Consolidated
Financial Statements contained herein relate to this industry segment.
(c) Narrative Description of the Business:
TERMINATION OF TRANSACTION WITH PAN PACIFIC.
On January 10, 1997, the Trust entered into a definitive merger
agreement with Pan Pacific Development (U.S.) Inc. whereby both entities
agreed to contribute certain properties into a subsidiary of the Trust,
Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. On March 25, 1997, the agreement
was terminated for failure of certain conditions. The Trustees will continue
to pursue alternative sources of financing or an alternative approach
involving the orderly sale of the Trust's assets.
OVERVIEW
The Trust invests in real estate interests and mortgage notes. At
December 31, 1996, the Trust owned (i) a 100% equity interest in two shopping
centers, one of which is in receivership; (ii) a 40% controlling interest in
Kingsco, a general partnership that owns a ground lessee's interest in a
shopping center; and (iii) a ground lessee's interest in one strip shopping
center for redevelopment. In addition, the Trust holds various notes
receivable, most of which are secured by deeds of trust and acquired in
connection with sales or assignments of Trust properties or contractual
rights to acquire properties, and a leasehold interest in a parcel of land
that could be developed as a retail or office building. Each of the Trust's
shopping center properties is located in the metropolitan San Francisco Bay
Area. Notes receivable are secured by deeds of trust on shopping center
properties located in Northern California.
The Trust's shopping centers attract local area customers and are
typically anchored by a supermarket, superdrug, or other type of convenience
store. Anchor retailers are critically important to the success of the
shopping center because they attract consistent local traffic and repeat
shoppers whose expenditures support a variety of other stores in the shopping
center. Examples of anchor retailers in the Trust's shopping center
properties are WalMart, Lucky Stores and Walgreen. The overall tenant mix in
each of the Trust's shopping centers typically caters to the retailing of
day-to-day consumer necessities rather than high-priced luxury or specialty
items.
1
<PAGE>
POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES
The following is a discussion of the Trust's objectives and policies
with respect to investment, disposition, financing and certain other
activities in light of current conditions. Current capital constraints
affecting the Trust effectively preclude new acquisitions of significance.
The investment policies and other policies of the Trust are reviewed herein
in the context of the Trust's current financial condition. These policies
are determined by the Trustees, and may be amended or revised from time to
time at the discretion of the Trustees without a vote of the holders of
beneficial interests of the Trust ("shareholders"). No assurance can be
given that these investment objectives will be attained or that the value of
the Trust will not continue to decrease.
INVESTMENT POLICY. The Trust's historic investment objective has been
to invest in commercial real estate which would generate cash distributions
and long-term capital appreciation. This policy was successful from 1964
until recent years. Since 1974 the Trust has sought to accomplish these
objectives by acquisition, development and redevelopment of anchored
neighborhood shopping centers and commercial property in Northern California.
One reason the Trust concentrated in retail was because the anchor retail
stores tended to limit oversupply by building only to demand. But in recent
years the emergence of an entirely new group of retailers have changed that
historical pattern of development completely, resulting in increasing
over-construction in retail. In addition, during the last five years, the
Trust's lack of access to equity capital coupled with adverse property market
conditions have frustrated the Trust's achievement of its investment
objectives. These circumstances have resulted in the suspension of cash
distributions to shareholders, a reduction in the value of the Trust's assets
and a lack of liquidity for shareholders. The Trust has not acquired new
investment property since 1992 and its development activities have been
suspended.
Since 1991 the Trust has been actively seeking to recapitalize to
overcome these challenges. This activity has been conducted both under the
direction of several investment bankers as well as independently with
institutional investors. Recapitalization strategies that have been
considered include joint venture, merger and listing on one of the national
stock exchanges. During the early 1990's the impact of a nationwide economic
recession and the volatility of public capital markets have prevented a
successful outcome to these efforts. The Trust has conducted active
discussions with potential merger or joint venture candidates and the
Trustees have explored exhaustively every reasonable opportunity.
The value of the Trust's property portfolio has declined during the past
several years. This decline is the result of multiple factors. During the
early 1990's most prominent was the collapse of commercial real estate values
nationwide as a result of overbuilding, fallout from the savings and loan
collapse and the consequent liquidation of large numbers of commercial
properties at prices significantly below replacement cost, severely
depressing the nation's property markets. Other prominent factors include
the pronounced depth and protracted nature of the recent economic recession
and the permanent defense industry cutbacks which had a particularly adverse
effect on California commercial real estate values. While the economy
improved in 1995 and 1996, the value of the Trust's shopping center portfolio
has continued to be adversely affected by simultaneous rapid and continuing
changes in the retail industry. The proliferation of "big-box" discount
retailers characterized by their predatory pricing and marketing practices is
having a widespread impact, putting many traditional retailers at risk and
some into bankruptcy. The corollary effect of this retailing revolution has
been an aggressive overbuilding in the retail sector in excess of consumer
demand leading to increased vacancy and tenant business failures, driving
down rents and property values. While market conditions have improved during
the latter half of 1996 and into 1997, retail property values in general are
still off their valuation levels achieved in 1989 and 1990.
In addition to these general economic and retail industry trends the
value of the Trust's property portfolio has been damaged as a result of
adverse developments at El Portal Shopping Center in San Pablo, California.
Between 1994 through 1996 the Trust suffered the loss and closure of all of
its anchor tenants in the El Portal Shopping Center, resulting in the loss of
all its equity in the property, which formerly comprised a significant
proportion of the Trust's net worth and provided substantial annual cash flow
from operations. The cash drain, at the property level, created by these
problems prompted the Trust to cease making payments on the El Portal
property mortgage in October 1996. This action coupled with problems
relating to an old toxic release on the property, caused the mortgage holder
to file with the appropriate court jurisdiction to place the
2
<PAGE>
property in receivership. This receivership was formally ratified by the
court in January 1997. Meanwhile, at Monterey Plaza Shopping Center, the
closure of the HomeBase Store and the ensuing more than two year vacancy
(which ended in August 1996 when WalMart took over the lease) caused
significant economic harm to the property, not least of which was a reduction
in rent of more than $400,000 per year as well as other expensive concessions
coupled with the failure of many smaller retailers.
In considering dispositions, the Trust makes disposition decisions based
on current market conditions and its objective of realizing maximum value for
its shareholders.
FINANCING. The Trust intends to restructure its portfolio during 1997
in order to reduce indebtedness and achieve liquidity, by either pursuing
alternative financing or the sale of the Trust's properties and assets.
DISTRIBUTIONS. Until 1993, the Trust's policy had been to pay dividends
to its shareholders in an amount approximating 100% of its cash flows from
operations (i.e., net operating income plus depreciation and amortization).
Capital gains have been distributed on a case by case basis. That portion of
a distribution which is sheltered by depreciation and amortization
constitutes a nontaxable return of capital to the shareholders. Dividends
were paid on a regular basis for twenty-nine years, since 1964. However, on
February 25, 1993, the Trustees unanimously decided to suspend the payment of
regular dividends in order to conserve the Trust's cash flow, in an effort to
meet its capital needs, to maintain the quality of the Trust's properties and
to protect the Trust's credit, since the Trustees concluded that the Trust
could no longer rely on its traditional sources of liquidity (i.e., secured
bank financing and "intrastate" equity offerings) for these purposes. The
suspension of dividends is not expected to affect the Trust's qualification
as a REIT and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
WORKING CAPITAL RESERVES. The Trust seeks to maintain working capital
reserves (and, when not sufficient, access to borrowings) in amounts that the
Trustees determine to be adequate to meet normal capital demands in
connection with the operation of the Trust's business and investments. As
noted above, the Trust expects that it will either restructure or sell its
portfolio in order to generate adequate working capital reserves.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST POLICIES. The Trust has adopted certain policies
designed to reduce potential conflicts of interest. Such policies do not
apply where a Trustee, officer or affiliate has acquired property for the
sole purpose of facilitating its acquisition by the Trust, and the total
consideration paid by the Trust does not exceed the cost of the property to
such person (which cost is increased by such person's holding costs and
decreased by any income received by such person from the property) and no
special benefit results to such person. The Trustees may engage in real
estate transactions which may be of the type conducted by the Trust, but it
is not anticipated that such transactions will have a material effect upon
the Trust's operations.
OTHER POLICIES. The Trust intends to operate in a manner that will not
subject it to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended. The Trust does not intend (i) to invest in the securities of other
issuers for the purpose of exercising control over such issuers, (ii) to
underwrite securities of other issuers or (iii) to trade actively in loans or
other investments.
The Trust may make investments other than as previously described,
although it does not currently plan to do so. The Trust has authority to
repurchase or otherwise reacquire Trust Shares it has issued or may issue and
it may engage in such activities in the future. The Trustees have no present
intention of causing the Trust to repurchase any of the Trust Shares, and any
such action would be taken only in conformity with applicable federal and
state laws and the requirements for qualifying as a REIT under the Code and
the Treasury Regulations. Although the Trust may do so in the future in
connection with the purchase of additional properties or otherwise, the Trust
has not issued securities in exchange for property, nor has it reacquired any
of its securities. The Trust may make loans to third parties, including,
without limitation, to officers and to joint ventures in which the Trust
decides to participate, although no such loans have been made.
At all times, the Trust intends to meet the requirements of the Code to
qualify as a REIT unless, because of changes in future economic, market or
legal conditions, or changes in the Code or in the Treasury Regulations, the
Trustees elect to revoke the Trust's REIT election.
3
<PAGE>
MARKET CONDITIONS
The Company does not believe that the real estate market is an efficient
market. Local conditions and the type of commercial operations conducted at
each property directly affect property values in ways that may be unrelated
to overall nationwide, regional or neighborhood market trends. The real
estate market is also highly competitive, and maintaining property values is
difficult. Access to economically available equity capital is critical to
creating and maintaining real estate values. Other real estate investment
trusts (most of which are much larger than the Trust), pension trusts,
private investors, and real estate syndicates compete directly with the Trust
for capital. In addition to these geographic and industry considerations,
the market for real estate is heavily influenced by the financial, bond and
securities markets, as well as political, regulatory and Code factors.
During the last several years, investors have become increasingly
selective about real estate. This heightened selectivity has occurred
against a complex marketplace backdrop characterized by declining values and
reduced liquidity, lack of capital, adverse fall out resulting from reform of
the tax code, property over-building, solvency crisis in the savings and loan
industry and the related incidences of distress sales and dumping of swollen
property inventories by the Resolution Trust Corporation. Most of this
occurred within the context of a severe national economic recession. The
Trustees do not expect values to recover to the market levels achieved in the
late 1980's and early 1990's, prior to the downturn. This is particularly
true for retail property and there can be no assurance that this improvement
will occur or that 1997 will see any improvement. Thus there remain
significant impediments to the Trust's ability either to resume cash
distributions or to establish liquidity for its shareholders without
improvement in market values or capital restructuring.
The Trust is not involved in research and development activities other
than market research.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. Under various federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may become
liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous
substances released on or in its property. Such laws impose such liability
without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible
for, the release of such hazardous substances. The presence of such
substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, when
released, usually reduces the value and adversely affects the ability to sell
such real estate or to borrow using such real estate as collateral.
The Trust has notified a governmental authority of a spill from a former
dry cleaning shop at King's Court Shopping Center and the Regional Water
Quality Control Board of Santa Clara County has issued a clean-up order to
the Trust. Currently, a plan of remediation has been prepared with a
proposed plan of action for clean-up of the contamination. The remediation
clean-up is now underway and is expected to last at least two years. This
plan has been approved by the pertinent regulatory agencies on an interim
basis, pending review of remediation and testing results. The cost to
Kingsco for the clean-up is estimated to be $1,032,000, of which $723,000 has
already been expended. Reimbursements received from the insurance company
total $503,000. The Trust was not a partner of Kingsco at the time the
contamination occurred, and intends to look to the seller of the Trust's 40%
interest in Kingsco, Kingsco's insurance carriers at the time of the
contamination, the other partners of Kingsco and the entity that caused the
contamination for payment of the clean-up costs. The Trust believes that the
representations and warranties made by the seller in the agreement pursuant
to which the Trust acquired its partnership interest give the Trust a cause
of action against the seller for the clean-up costs.
In another, unrelated, environmental audit of the gasoline service
station pad ("Exxon Pad") at King's Court Shopping Center, the Phase I and II
work identified gasoline and possibly other service station by-products in
the soil underneath the station and its pumps. Exxon Corporation has assumed
financial and legal responsibility of the hazardous materials and remediation
of the Exxon Pad. The environmental firm responsible for maintaining and
analyzing the data from various monitoring wells on the Pad continues to
report to the Trust and governmental authorities on a quarterly basis.
Remediation efforts are now underway and include both vapor extraction and
"pump and treat" activities, depending upon the location of the materials in
the soil and water.
The Trust has also become aware of a spill from a former dry cleaning
establishment at El Portal Shopping Center. This spill probably occurred
prior to the Trust's ownership of the property. The Contra Costa
4
<PAGE>
County Regional Water Quality Control Board is currently reviewing the
situation and a clean-up remediation proposed by the Trust. The cost of
clean-up and timetable have not yet been finalized, however, based on current
knowledge, the cost is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Trust's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. During
1996, the Trustees authorized remediation expenditure up to $100,000. At
December 31, 1996, Other Liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements include $100,000 for such costs.
The Trust ground leases a parcel of land in San Pablo, California (the
Wanlass property) which has been contaminated with a gasoline spill from an
adjacent property. The source of contamination has been identified and
Atlantic-Richfield Company, Inc. ("ARCO") has issued a letter of
indemnification for the Trust's benefit respecting all financial and legal
liability arising from this contamination.
At Monterey Plaza Shopping Center the Phase One Environmental Assessment
Report identified the possibility of oil and grease contamination in the soil
as well as possible residues of pesticides, herbicides and insecticides due
to prior agricultural use of the property. The property was acquired from
the State of California, which held title immediately prior to the Trust and
which, the Trust believes, would be liable for any such contamination under
the controlling statutes. These possible hazardous waste contaminations are
not considered to be of material significance to the Trust.
Compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations relating
to the protection of the environment could have a significant impact on the
financial position of the Trust. However, other than disclosed herein, the
Trustees are not currently aware of any conditions that would have a material
adverse effect on the Trust.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The Trust's properties are subject to
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (the "ADA"). The ADA
has separate compliance requirements for "public accommodations" and
"commercial facilities" and generally requires that public facilities such as
retail shopping centers be made accessible to people with disabilities.
These requirements became effective in 1992. Compliance with the ADA
requirements will require removal of access barriers and other capital
improvements at the Trust's properties. Noncompliance could result in
imposition of fines by the United States government or an award of damages to
private litigants. However, the Trust does not believe that the costs of
compliance will be material. If required changes involve a greater
expenditure than the Trust currently anticipates, or if the changes must be
made on a more accelerated basis than it anticipates, the Trust could be
adversely affected.
MANAGEMENT
The search for suitable real estate capitalization and portfolio
restructuring is pursued by the Trust's investment advisor, Collier
Investments (the "Advisor"), a proprietorship owned by Charles R. Collier.
Under the terms of an Investment Advisory Agreement between the Trust and the
Advisor, the Advisor has agreed to use its best efforts to present to the
Trust recapitalization and portfolio restructuring opportunities consistent
with the investment policies and objectives of the Trust. After careful
study and review, the Advisor may recommend to the Trustees those
opportunities or strategies whose character is consistent with the investment
program of the Trust. In addition to relying on the advice of the Advisor,
the Trustees occasionally employ the services of independent professional
consultants.
The Trust employs no full-time executives or administrative staff,
except for the President who is a part-time employee and he is compensated as
such. The leasing and management of the Trust's properties and administration
of the Trust itself is performed by an independent contractor, Menlo
Management Company. Menlo Management is owned by Robert C. Gould who is also
Vice President and a trustee of the Trust (see Related Party Transactions).
California Bavarian Company, a privately held California corporation,
provides shareholder communication and liaison support services to the Trust
on a contractual basis for a monthly service fee. California Bavarian
Company is not related to the Trust. However its director, Mark D. Mordell,
is an agent of the Trust.
The Trust has five trustees who meet once a month and who are
compensated by the Trust. The Trustees include: Wilcox Patterson, who
serves as President; Harry E. Kellogg, who serves as Treasurer; John
5
<PAGE>
H. Hoefer and Robert C. Gould, who serve as Vice Presidents and William S.
Royce, who serves as Secretary. Each of the Trustees, Officers and Advisor
invest in the Trust.
COMPETITION
The Trust's properties are located in metropolitan communities in the
San Francisco Bay Area. Each property is situated amidst fully developed
commercial and retail areas. As such, there are other competing neighborhood
and community shopping centers located in near proximity to the Trust's
properties. These factors will have a bearing on the Trust's ability to rent
its properties to tenants on economic terms and to impose effective
mechanisms to control operating costs and resultant net income. The Trust
must compete for tenants and services with other property owners who may have
greater resources or more attractive locations than those available to the
Trust and its officers, directors and agents. Moreover, the extent and
increasing rates of changes in community demographics, public policy, retail
usage patterns, merchandising practices, consumer tastes and financial
strength of tenants, amongst other considerations, can all affect adversely a
property's competitive position in varying ways.
INSURANCE
The Trust typically maintains comprehensive liability, fire, extended
coverage and rental loss insurance with respect to its properties, and
generally requires tenants to reimburse the Trust for their pro rata share of
the Trust's insurance premiums and to maintain their own general liability
insurance with respect to the properties with policy terms and insured limits
customarily carried for similar properties. There are, however, certain
types of losses (such as from wars, flood, riots or earthquakes) which may be
uninsurable or insurable only at rates which, in the Trust's opinion, are
prohibitive. King's Court Shopping Center is insured against damage from
earthquakes.
(d) Foreign Operations
The Trust does not engage in any foreign operations or derive revenues
from foreign sources.
6
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST'S PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Trust's
properties (excluding property in receivership at El Portal) as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EFFECTIVE
PERCENTAGE GROSS 1996 ANNUAL ANNUAL RENT PERCENT
OWNERSHIP LEASABLE MINIMUM PER SQUARE PERCENT LEASED & ANCHORS AND
NAME/LOCATION INTEREST AREA (SQ FT) RENT (3) FOOT LEASED OCCUPIED PRINCIPAL TENANTS
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
King's Court Shopping Center 40% 78,576 $ 1,338,000 $ 17.03 93% 93% Lunardi's Supermarket;
Los Gatos, California Bank of America
Wells Fargo Bank
Monterey Plaza 100% 183,180 2,439,000 13.31 95% 39% Lucky Stores;
Shopping Center WalMart (4);
San Jose, California (1) (2) Walgreen
Wanlass Shopping Center 100% (5) 36,135 72,000 1.99 28% 28% Mechanics Bank
San Pablo, California
</TABLE>
- ----------------------
(1) Lucky Stores owns its store at Monterey Plaza Shopping Center and,
therefore, is not a tenant of the Trust. Even though the Trust does not
benefit directly from the economic performance of this anchor store, the
anchor is nonetheless critical to the success of the shopping center.
(2) The aggregate gross leasable area does not include approximately
51,000 square feet at Monterey Plaza Shopping Center. This represents the
store owned by Lucky Stores.
(3) Annual minimum rent excludes (a) percentage rents, (b) additional rent
payable by tenants such as common area maintenance, real estate taxes and
other expense reimbursements, and (c) future contractual rent escalations
or Consumer Price Index adjustments. Percentage rents are paid over and
above base rents, and are calculated as a percentage of a tenant's gross
sales above a predetermined threshold. The amount of percentage rents
received to date by the Trust has not been material to the Trust's
operations. Figures for total annual minimum rent in the above table have
been calculated based on rental payments for the calendar year 1996, and
have been adjusted for the effects of recognizing rent on a straight-line
basis as reported in the Trust's financial statements.
(4) WalMart has assumed the HomeBase lease and was currently paying a minimum
rent at December 31, 1996. HomeBase also paid a partial rent until
WalMart opened for business on January 29, 1997.
(5) Title to the Wanlass Shopping Center is a leasehold estate based on a
ground lease which expires in 2045. The lease contains an option to
purchase for the benefit of the Trust, as well as a put option requiring
the Trust to purchase the property freehold upon the death of one of the
ground lessors or at any time after May 25, 1998. The property is
proposed for redevelopment.
KING'S COURT SHOPPING CENTER. This neighborhood shopping center is
located in the town of Los Gatos, California. The center is anchored by
Lunardi's Supermarket, a local supermarket chain, and an array of retail and
service tenants such as Hallmark Cards, Wells Fargo Bank and Bank of America.
King's Court Shopping Center has 78,576 square feet of gross leasable space.
The Trust presently owns a 40% interest in Kingsco, the general partnership
which owns this shopping center. In addition, the Trust manages King's Court
Shopping Center and has control over the shopping center's operations,
including any leasing, renovation, sale and financing activities.
Kingsco owns a leasehold estate as to the land and fee title as to the
improvements (excluding a gas station). The ground lease has only 27 years
left in a 50-year term, expiring in 2024, and requiring minimum annual lease
rental payments of $40,000 plus between 10% and 12% of the property's gross
rental revenue in excess of $333,333 per annum. The Trust is presently
negotiating with the ground lessors to extend the ground lease, however there
can be no assurance that these negotiations will succeed on economically
acceptable terms. The carrying cost of the center, which includes the other
partners' interest in the property, was $5,784,000 after depreciation at
December 31, 1996. The property is security for a first mortgage loan with
an interest rate of prime +1.75%. At December 31, 1996 the rate was 10.25%
and the outstanding balance was $1,307,000.
7
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1996, King's Court Shopping Center was 93% leased.
Tenants occupying 10% or more of the rentable space as of December 31, 1996
are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF TOTAL
GROSS LEASABLE GROSS LEASABLE ANNUALIZED
TENANT AREA (SQ FT) AREA BASE RENT END OF LEASE TERM
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Lunardi's Supermarket 23,960 30% $ 140,000(1) November 2003
(1 option for 10 years)
</TABLE>
(1) Additional percentage rents paid by Lunardi's Supermarket were $156,000 in
1996, $140,000 in 1995, and $99,000 in 1994.
The Trust has discovered toxic pollution of the ground water under
King's Court Shopping Center. See "Governmental Regulation--Environmental
Matters" for discussion of this circumstance.
MONTEREY PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER. This community shopping center is
located in San Jose, California. The Trust began the development of this
shopping center in 1987, and completed development in 1990. The center has
233,000 square feet of retail space, of which the Trust owns 183,180 square
feet, or all but the Lucky Store. In addition to the Lucky Store anchor,
other retailers include WalMart, Walgreen, McDonald's, Lyon's Restaurant and
Taco Bell.
Negotiations amongst the Trust, HomeBase and WalMart concerning the
terms of WalMart's assumption of the HomeBase lease required that the base
rents for the premises be reduced substantially from the contact rents
required under the HomeBase lease. Also WalMart's merchandising practices
demanded modifications to Walgreen's lease in respect of pharmaceutical,
health and beauty product sales. As a result Walgreen's lease was amended to
relieve Walgreen's of reimbursements of property taxes, to pay Walgreen up to
one million dollars for release of its exclusive rights and to permit
Walgreen to terminate its lease upon its sole discretion prior to maturity.
Under the terms of the lease assumption HomeBase and the Trust each made
certain financial contributions towards the remodel costs for the premises to
accommodate WalMart.
The Trust is in a dispute with WalMart concerning alleged deficiencies
in the tenant's premises at Monterey Plaza. The sum in question is
approximately $136,000 and represents roof and skylight repairs and upgrades.
The Trust has declined to accept responsibility for these items and is
contesting WalMart's claim of Landlord responsibilities. Trust management
does not expect the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on
the Trust.
Monterey Plaza is security for a first mortgage loan with an interest
rate of 9.720%. At December 31, 1996, the outstanding balance was
$18,412,000. This loan matures on February 7, 2000. At December 31, 1996 the
Trust's investment in Monterey Plaza Shopping Center was $25,236,000 after
accumulated depreciation.
At December 31, 1996, Monterey Plaza Shopping Center was 95% leased.
Tenants leasing 10% or more of the rentable space as of December 31, 1996 are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF TOTAL
GROSS LEASABLE GROSS LEASABLE ANNUALIZED
TENANT AREA (SQ FT) AREA BASE RENT END OF LEASE TERM
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Wal-Mart 101,500 55% $761,000 August 6, 2006
(6 options for 5 years)
</TABLE>
WANLASS SHOPPING CENTER. Wanlass Shopping Center is a strip shopping
center located in San Pablo, California. The property has a total of 36,135
square feet of gross leasable area. Located adjacent to the Trust's El
Portal Shopping Center and fronting onto San Pablo Avenue, it was acquired as
a leasehold investment by the Trust in 1995 in connection with the plan to
redevelop El Portal Shopping Center. However the property is able to stand
alone as a retail investment, once certain physical improvements are made and
retail tenants installed. If capital is available, the Trust expects to
undertake these improvements for certain retail tenants on a build-to-suit
basis. The property is a fee title as to the improvement and a leasehold
estate as to the land under
8
<PAGE>
a ground lease which expires in 2045 with annual ground rent of $192,000.
There is currently no Trust indebtedness or financing secured by the
leasehold. The anchor tenant is Mechanics Bank.
The percentage of the center that is both leased and occupied at
December 31, 1996 was 28%. Tenants leasing 10% or more of the rentable space
as of December 31, 1996 are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF TOTAL
GROSS LEASABLE GROSS LEASABLE ANNUALIZED
TENANT AREA (SQ FT) AREA BASE RENT END OF LEASE TERM
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mechanics Bank 6,000 17% $ 30,780 September 2006
(2 options for 10 years)
</TABLE>
EL PORTAL SHOPPING CENTER. El Portal Shopping Center is a community
shopping center located in the city of San Pablo, California. The center was
acquired by the Trust in 1976, and repositioned and expanded in 1978 and
1986, respectively. The center has a total of 271,426 square feet of gross
leasable area. From 1976 to 1995 El Portal was an important source of cash
flow to the Trust. Between 1994 through 1996 El Portal suffered a complete
reversal arising from the loss or closure of all of its anchor tenants. The
resultant cash drain from the property prompted the Trust to suspend making
any further mortgage payments to the Trust Deed Non-Recourse Note holder,
Nationwide Life Insurance Company. The lender accordingly sought to place
the property in receivership as a prerequisite to obtaining fee title to the
property. This step was also prompted by the discovery in 1995 of a toxic
spill emanating from a former dry cleaner tenant. This spill probably
occurred prior to the Trust's acquisition of the property. The property was
officially confirmed into permanent receivership in January 1997. The Trust
expects that there is no residual equity for the Trust in the El Portal
Shopping Center.
VESTING OF TITLE TO PROPERTIES
Monterey Plaza and El Portal are owned in fee title, King's Court
Shopping Center and a parcel of land under the Wanlass Shopping Center fee
title to the properties is owned by the Trust. For King's Court Shopping
Center, the Trust acquired a 40% controlling interest in the general
partnership which owns a leasehold estate as to the land and fee title as to
the improvements (excluding a gas station). The ground lease term expires in
2024. In San Pablo the Trust leases a 2.513-acre parcel of land adjacent to
the El Portal Shopping Center and fronting onto San Pablo Avenue (the Wanlass
property). The ground lease expires in 2045 and contains a sell/put option
to purchase upon either the death of one of the ground lessors or on or after
March 1, 1998.
PROPERTY CONDITION
All of the buildings are suitable and adequate for the purposes for
which they were designed, are being used for those purposes, where leased and
occupied, and are in a good state of repair with the exception of El Portal
Shopping Center, which is in receivership, and the Wanlass Shopping Center,
which is a redevelopment property. However, due to changes in retail
industry practice, in recent years it has become increasingly evident that
tenant improvements for new and replacement tenants have escalated in cost
significantly in excess of the rate of inflation and have tended to increase
capitalization in Trust properties to a material extent. This trend is
partially a consequence of the growing competitiveness of the rental
marketplace in which the Trust's properties operate.
Routine ongoing requirements of building upkeep and tenant replacements
will necessitate capital expenditures during the future. The precise extent
of such expenditures cannot yet be determined.
PROPERTY SALES
On February 29, 1996, the Trust sold Menlo Center for a sales price of
$16,200,000. The existing financing was assumed by the buyer. After provision
for closing costs, transfer fees and real estate commissions, the proceeds of
this sale were all used to pay down other short-term Trust indebtedness and to
provide working
9
<PAGE>
capital for the Trust. The Trust remains liable to the buyer for an annual
net income subsidy for the remaining term of the First Deed of Trust
financing which matures in 2000.
PRINCIPAL TENANTS
WalMart Stores, Inc. ("WalMart") is the Trust's largest tenant. WalMart
is a national discount retailer chain, which is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange and, as of December 31, 1996, has credit rating of AA1 determined by
Moody's and Standard and Poor's. In August 1996, WalMart assumed the
HomeBase lease after significant modifications including rental reductions as
well as concomitant economic rental concessions from Walgreen.
Other significant tenants at the Trust's properties include Walgreen,
Lunardi's Supermarkets and Wells Fargo Bank, which lease properties
representing approximately 17% of the Trust's gross leasable area and 18% of
its base rental revenues.
Information with respect to the Trust's five largest tenants as of
December 31, 1996 is set forth in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS
NUMBER OF LEASABLE AREA PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF
TENANT LEASES (SQ FT) TOTAL BASE RENT/YEAR TOTAL
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
WalMart 1 101,500 34% $761,000 20%
Lunardi's Supermarket 1 23,960 8% 140,000 4%
Walgreen 1 14,000 5% 191,000 5%
Wells Fargo Bank 1 5,670 2% 182,000 5%
Bank of America 1 4,800 2% 150,000 4%
</TABLE>
OCCUPANCY RATES FOR PAST FIVE YEARS
The following table shows year-end rates for the past five fiscal years
for rentable space both leased and occupied, expressed as a percentage of total
rentable square footage for each of the Trust's properties:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Property 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
King's Court Shopping Center 100% 100% 98% 100% 93%
Monterey Plaza Shopping Center (1) 91% 98% 43% 39% 39%
Wanlass Shopping Center na na na na 28%
</TABLE>
- ------------------
(1) The WalMart Store at Monterey Plaza Shopping Center opened for business
January 29, 1997. See Description of Trust's Properties and Principal
Tenants.
(2) Wanlass Shopping Center was ground leased in May, 1995.
AVERAGE EFFECTIVE ANNUAL BASE RENT PER SQUARE FOOT FOR PAST FIVE YEARS
The following table shows average effective annual base rent per square
foot for each of the Trust's properties for the past five years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Property 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
King's Court Shopping Center $14.79 $14.85 $16.24 $16.55 $17.03
Monterey Plaza Center 13.73 14.14 14.03 14.58 13.31
Wanlass Shopping Center na na na na 1.99
(proposed for redevelopment)
</TABLE>
(1) Wanlass Shopping Center was ground leased in May, 1995.
10
<PAGE>
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
The following table shows lease expirations for the next ten years for
existing tenants at the Trust's properties as of December 31, 1996, assuming
that none of the tenants exercise renewal options:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Approximate Percent of Total Percent of Gross Average Annual
Lease Area in Leased Square Annualized Annual Rent Base Rent/year
Square Feet Footage Base Rent/year Represented by Per Square Foot
Lease Expiration Number of Under Expiring Represented by Under Expiring Expiring Under Expiring
Year Leases Expiring Leases Expiring Leases Leases Leases Leases
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1997 9 17,872 7.11% $ 338,028 9.45% $ 18.91
1998 4 4,637 1.85% 95,322 2.66% 20.56
1999 5 9,823 3.91% 215,423 6.02% 21.93
2000 6 6,871 2.74% 148,993 4.16% 21.68
2001 10 30,645 12.20% 774,294 21.64% 25.27
2002 1 264 .11% 1,980 .06% 7.50
2003 5 34,842 13.87% 484,628 13.54% 13.91
2004 2 4,887 1.95% 113,603 3.17% 23.25
2005 1 1,388 0.55% 29,148 .81% 21.00
2006 2 107,500 42.79% 792,030 22.14% 7.37
AFTER 2006 6 32,477 12.92% 584,648 16.35% 18.00
-- ------- ------ ----------- ------ -------
TOTAL 51 251,206 100.00% $ 3,578,097 100.00% $ 14.24
-- ------- ------ ----------- ------ -------
-- ------- ------ ----------- ------ -------
</TABLE>
LEASES
The majority of the anchor leases on the Trust's retail properties
provide for initial lease terms of between ten and twenty years, and the
leases on the Trust's smaller shop spaces typically provide for lease terms
of between three and five years. The Trust typically seeks to structure the
leases on its properties as "triple net" leases that impose on the tenant pro
rata obligations for real property taxes and assessments, repairs and
maintenance of common areas and insurance. Through the use of triple net
leases, the Trust seeks to reduce its exposure to escalating operational
costs and risks and the demands upon managerial time typically associated
with investments in real estate. In this way, triple net leases provide
opportunities for income growth from contractual rent increases without
corresponding increases in operational costs. However, the Trust has agreed
in certain instances to retain or limit the responsibility for some
obligations that would otherwise be the responsibility of the tenant under a
triple net lease.
OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS
As of December 31, 1996, the combined total indebtedness of the Trust
was approximately $33,400,000, consisting entirely of fixed rate debt except
for $1,307,000 of floating rate debt. Aggregate indebtedness included
$25,700,000 in long-term mortgage loans with maturity dates ranging from 1999
to 2000 and $7,700,000 in short-term notes payable with maturity dates in
1997. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
Trust's mortgage loans:
11
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROPERTY OR INTERESTS MATURITY PRINCIPAL SCHEDULED ANNUAL ANNUAL DEBT BALANCE DUE
PLEDGED AS COLLATERAL DATE BALANCE AMORTIZATION INTEREST RATE SERVICE AT MATURITY(1)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
El Portal (2)(4) 07/01/00 $ 4,438,000 $683,000 9.625% $ 583,000 $ 3,755,000
King's Court 06/01/99 1,307,000 87,000 10.25%(3) 168,000 1,220,000
Monterey Plaza 02/07/00 18,412,000 569,000 9.720% 1,954,000 17,843,000
Mt. Shasta (4) 01/02/99 1,543,000 204,000 9.375% 238,000 1,338,000
---------- ----------- ---------- -----------
TOTAL $25,700,000 $1,543,000 $2,943,000 $24,156,000
----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
</TABLE>
- -------------------
(1) Assumes no prepayments of principal prior to due dates thereof. The
mortgage loan with respect to Monterey Plaza Shopping Center permits
prepayment, but with substantial prepayment penalties.
(2) This property is in receivership.
(3) This mortgage loan bears interest at prime +1.75%, figure given is as of
December 31, 1996.
(4) This property is no longer owned by the Trust, but the Trust remains the
primary obligor on the underlying mortgage and ground lease. See
"Mortgage Notes Relating to Property Sales" below.
The following table shows the scheduled maturity of the Trust's long-term
mortgage loans over the next five years:
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
YEAR MATURING INDEBTEDNESS
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 $4,743,000 18.46%
1998 332,000 1.29%
1999 2,782,000 10.82%
2000 17,843,000 69.43%
2001 000 0.00%
------------- ------
Total, December 31, 1996 $ 25,700,000 100.00%
------------- ------
------------- ------
The 1997 amount shown in above includes a $4,438,000 loan secured by the
property in receivership at El Portal Shopping Center (see note to
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein).
MORTGAGE NOTES RELATING TO PROPERTY SALES
As part of its strategy to focus on metropolitan "in-fill" locations as
opposed to more rural locations, the Trust sold two properties, one each in
1988 and 1990. In connection with such sales, the Trust accepted seller
financing:
(i) WESTWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER. In December 1988, the Trust sold
the Westwood Village Shopping Center for $6,475,000, payable in cash of
$1,100,000 and a $5,375,000 seller carry-back note receivable due in seven
years with interest only payments at a rate of 9%. In March 1990, the
purchaser obtained a $4,100,000 loan secured by a first mortgage on this
shopping center to pay down the Trust's note. The remaining amount owed to
the Trust is subordinate to this new loan. The principal balance owed to the
Trust on December 31, 1996 was $1,104,000 and payments are current. This
loan was to mature in December 1995, but has been successively extended and
now matures December 1997. The shopping center income is sufficient to cover
the payments on this Note. However, there is considerable chronic high level
of vacancy at Westwood Village due to overbuilding of retail facilities in
the Redding area. This has put downward pressure on rents and property
values. The Trust feels that this Note may ultimately be only partially
collectible and its book carrying value has been reduced to $600,000 at
December 31, 1996.
12
<PAGE>
(II) MT. SHASTA SHOPPING CENTER. In August 1990, the Trust sold the Mt.
Shasta Shopping Center for $5,100,000, payable in cash of $900,000 and a
$4,200,000 all-inclusive promissory note and second deed of trust due January
1, 1999 (the "Mt. Shasta Note"). The Mt. Shasta Note bears interest 9.25%.
Because the interest rate was less than the market rate during the initial
period, the Mt. Shasta Note was discounted by $303,000 which is being
recognized as additional interest income over the term of the Mt. Shasta
Note. The Mt. Shasta Note requires interest only payments until it matures on
January 1, 1999. The Trust continues to be the primary obligor on the
underlying first mortgage note, the principal balance of which at December
31, 1996 was $1,543,000. Payments on the Mt. Shasta note are current. The
current owner of Mt. Shasta Shopping Center expects to refinance the property
and thereby repay the Trust's remaining loan balance. There is no assurance,
however, that this refinancing can be accomplished.
PROPERTY IN RECEIVERSHIP
On October 24, 1996, El Portal Shopping Center, located in San Pablo,
California was placed in receivership by the Superior Court of the State of
California. The receiver is an unrelated entity selected by Nationwide Life
Insurance Company, the holder of a non-recourse first mortgage on the
property, and the Superior Court. The Trust's decision to withhold further
mortgage payment obligations to the holder of the first mortgage was a result
of the property's continued negative cash flow resulting from recurring
losses and required capital expenditures. At the time of the receivership,
El Portal's first mortgage loan balance was $4,438,000. The Trust remains
liable for environmental matters, including a toxic spill from a former dry
cleaning establishment at El Portal Shopping Center. See discussion in
Government Regulation-Environmental Matters. Loss on disposition of $987,000
was recorded in 1996.
OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
The Trust entered into a purchase and sale agreement in 1993 (the "1993
Agreement") and three additional purchase and sale agreements in 1994 (the
"1994 Agreements") to purchase a total of four shopping centers.
In 1994 the Trust assigned its interest in the 1993 Agreement and the
1994 Agreements to another real estate investment trust for the sum of
$2,361,000, adjusted for certain closing costs and prorations. The Trust
also guaranteed the payment of certain rentals at the properties to the buyer
for a 24-month period.
During 1994, the Trust recorded a gain of $994,000 net of a rent
guarantee reserve accrual of $390,000, as the result the above transaction.
In 1995, the Trust increased the reserve by an additional $213,000,
In connection with the above transactions, on June 7, 1994, (i) Scotts
Valley Plaza, a California limited partnership ("Scott"), granted to the
Trust a one-year option to acquire the shopping center commonly known as
Scotts Village Plaza and (ii) Scotts Village Phase II, a California limited
partnership ("Scotts II"), granted a one-year option to the Trust to purchase
Scotts Valley Square, both of which are located in Scotts Valley, California.
Concurrently with the grant of these options and in connection with the
transactions contemplated by that certain Assignment and Agreement dated May
9 1994 and amended May 25, 1994, executed by and between Pacific Real Estate
Investment Trust and Western Investment Real Estate Trust, the Trust made a
loan to Malcolm R. Riley, one of the principals in Scotts and Scotts II, in
the amount of $750,000. The loan bears interest at 9% per annum, payable
monthly, and the principal is due and payable in 6 years. Simultaneously,
the Trust made a loan to Russell R. Pratt, in the amount of $500,000. That
loan bears interest at 8% per annum, payable monthly, and the principal is
due and payable in 6 years. Each of these loans is secured by the borrower's
respective partnership interests in Scotts and Scotts II. The Trust also
made a loan in the amount of $75,000 to Scotts, which bears interest at 8.6%
per annum (payable monthly), is due in 6 years and is secured by a second
deed of trust on Scotts Village Plaza. Payment on these notes are current.
13
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Between 1994 through 1996 El Portal suffered a complete reversal arising
from the loss or closure of all of its anchor tenants. The resultant cash
drain from the property prompted the Trust to suspend making any further
mortgage payments to the Trust Deed Non-Recourse Note Holder, Nationwide Life
Insurance Company. The unpaid balance of the mortgage loan was $4,438,000 at
December 31, 1996. The lender accordingly sought to place the property in
receivership as a prerequisite to obtaining fee title to the property. This
step was also prompted by the discovery in 1995 of a toxic spill emanating
from a former dry cleaner tenant, which probably occurred prior to the
Trust's acquisition of the property. The property was officially confirmed
into permanent receivership in January 1997. The Trust expects that there is
no residual equity for the Trust in the El Portal Shopping Center and during
1996, wrote down the carrying value by $987,000 (see Note 10).
The Trust is not presently involved in any other material litigation
nor, to its knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the
Trust or its properties, other than routine litigation arising out of the
ordinary course of business, some of which is expected to be covered by the
Trust's liability insurance and all of which collectively is not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the
Trust.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 1996.
14
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S TRUST SHARES AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS
MARKET VALUE OF TRUST SHARES
There is no established public trading market for Trust Shares.
Historically, the Trust maintained consecutive offerings of new Trust Shares
to existing shareholders and to the investing public at prices representing
the then current estimated market value for the Trust Shares. The Trust's
policy has been to review the prices at which Trust Shares were offered at
least annually, and at such other times as the Trustees believed the
estimated value of the Trust's assets had changed to a degree sufficient to
alter the prices of Trust Shares. In the past, Trust Shares have been offered
solely to California residents pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of the federal securities laws, and have been qualified with the
State of California for issuance pursuant to offering circulars prepared by
the Trust. The Trust's most recent offering circular expired on December 15,
1992, and no new Trust Shares have been sold since such date.
The Trust also historically maintained a dividend reinvestment program
through which existing shareholders were able to purchase Trust Shares at a
discount from the then current offering price in lieu of receiving dividends
in cash. The dividend reinvestment program has been suspended since the
expiration of the Trust's last offering circular in December 1992.
From time to time, to provide existing shareholders with a means of
trading Trust Shares, Pacific Real Estate Securities Co., Inc. ("Presco") has
acted as a crossing agent on behalf of the Trust so that persons interested
in acquiring Trust Shares could purchase Trust Shares from persons interested
in selling Trust Shares. Because there is no current offering circular in
place, Presco is not presently effecting crossing transfers of Trust Shares,
ceased operation as a broker/dealer in November 1995, and has subsequently
been wound up. Shareholders wishing to liquidate their interests in the Trust
must locate buyers for their Trust Shares independently. As of December 31,
1996, the Trust had been notified of 145,000 Trust Shares available for sale
by existing shareholders. There may be many more shareholders who also wish
to sell their shares, but lacking a market mechanism, have not formally
notified the Trust of their intentions. At this time, the Trust cannot
predict when or at what price these Trust Shares will be liquidated.
As of December 31, 1996, there were 3,706,845 Trust Shares issued and
outstanding which were held of record by approximately 3,500 shareholders.
15
<PAGE>
DISTRIBUTION POLICY
Historically, the Trust's policy has been to pay dividends to its
shareholders in an amount approximating 100% of its cash flows from
operations (i.e., net operating income plus depreciation and amortization).
From its inception in 1963, the Trust made 155 consecutive bi-monthly or
quarterly regular distributions. With respect to distributions paid in 1991,
1992 and the first quarter of 1993, 100% of the amount paid was sheltered
from current taxable liability as a result of book depreciation expense. On
February 25, 1993, the payment of dividends was suspended in order to
conserve the Trust's cash flow, to provide for its capital improvements
program, to maintain the quality of the Trust's properties and to protect the
Trust's credit, since the Trustees concluded that the Trust could no longer
rely on its traditional sources of liquidity (i.e., secured bank financing
and "intrastate" equity offerings). Dividends have remained suspended
through December 31, 1996. The Trust is applying the funds that would
otherwise have been distributed to its shareholders (i) to fund capital
expenditures necessary to maintain its properties, (ii) to make requisite
principal payments on its mortgage indebtedness and (iii) to facilitate
tenant improvements required upon developing and reletting of the Trust's
properties. Because the Trust did not have taxable income for 1996, the
suspension of dividends is not expected to affect the Trust's qualification
as a REIT.
16
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following represents selected financial data for the Trust for the
five years ended December 31, 1996. Acquisitions and dispositions which
occurred during the periods presented below materially affect the
comparability of the data. The data should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31: 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- ------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Data:
Rental revenues . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,780,000 $ 9,183,000 $ 12,417,000 $ 9,725,000 $ 8,683,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . $ 216,000 $ 2,031,000 $ (3,870,000) $ 2,730,000 $ 2,919,000
Property acquisition expenses,
prepayment penalty,
reincorporation expenses and
expenses of prospective offering. . . (230,000) (214,000) (1,430,000) (1,833,000) (80,000)
Interest income/(expense)--net (2,759,000) (4,727,000) (7,197,000) (4,588,000) (3,450,000)
Gain (loss) on lease termination (240,000) 3,577,000
Gain (loss) on options. . . . . . . . (213,000) 994,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Loss before minority
interest in joint venture . . . . . . (3,013,000) (3,123,000) (7,926,000) (3,691,000) (611,000)
Less minority interest in joint
venture's operations. . . . . . . . . (414,000) (325,000) (328,000) (238,000) (255,000)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (3,427,000) $ (3,448,000) $ (8,254,000) $ (3,929,000) $ (866,000)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss per share of
beneficial interest . . . . . . . . . $ (0.92) $ (0.93) $ (2.23) $ (1.06) $ (0.23)
Cash dividends per share of
beneficial interest . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.21 $ 0.62
AS OF DECEMBER 31:
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 46,183,000 $ 62,875,000 $ 95,287,000 $112,697,000 $110,269,000
Mortgages and other loans payable . . $ 33,400,000 $ 48,008,000 $ 75,770,000 $ 84,887,000 $ 78,643,000
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . 3,706,845 3,706,845 3,706,845 3,707,072 3,706,308
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with "Selected
Financial Data" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto
appearing elsewhere herein.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
During 1996 the Trust continued its efforts to recapitalize through a
variety of ways, including joint venture or merger with a compatible real
estate partner. This process has been hindered by the problems at El Portal
Shopping Center and the until recently unresolved HomeBase vacancy at Monterey
Plaza, as well as the toxic pollution at King's Court Shopping Center. In
order to meet its debt obligations and reduce its debt expense, the Trust sold
its Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center in March 1995, Menlo Center in February
1996 and is considering further sale of assets in 1997 in order to achieve
these goals.
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1996 was $3,427,000 as
compared to a net loss of $3,448,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995, a
decrease in the loss of $21,000.
Rental revenues decreased from $9,183,000 to $5,780,000, a decrease
of $3,403,000, or 37%, as a result of the sale of both Lakeshore Plaza Shopping
Center in 1995 and Menlo Center in 1996, and the declining revenues at El
Portal Shopping Center as a result of the HomeBase lease termination in 1994
and closures of Safeway Stores, Long's Drug store and Bank of America.
Operating expenses decreased from $2,145,000 in 1995 to $1,619,000 in
1996, a decrease of $526,000, or 25% due to a decrease in expenses at Lakeshore
Plaza Shopping Center in 1995 and Menlo Center in 1996, resulting from the sale
of the both centers, which was partial offset by an increase in the Wanless
ground lease expense.
Property taxes decreased from $1,194,000 in 1995 to $483,000 in 1996,
a decrease of $711,000, or 60% Property management fees decreased from $318,000
in 1995 to $197,000 in 1996, a decrease of $121,000, or 38%. Depreciation and
amortization decreased from $2,886,000 in 1995 to $2,062,000 in 1996, a
decrease of $824,000 or 29%. Each of these decreases resulted from the sale of
Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center in 1995 and Menlo Center in 1996.
General and administrative expenses decreased from $609,000 in 1995
to $520,000 in 1996, a decrease of $89,000 or 15% due to cost saving measures.
Loss on impairment of value was recognized $1,455,000 in 1996 due to
the reduction in carry value of El Portal Shopping Center by $987,000 and the
write down of the Trust's interest in the Westwood Village note of $468,000.
Gain on the sale of property of $772,000 represents the gain on the
sale of Menlo Center which was sold on February 29, 1996.
Interest income increased by $8,000, or 1%, from $637,000 to
$645,000, as a result of the interest earned on restricted funds.
Interest expense decreased by $1,960,000, or 37%, from $5,364,000 to
$3,404,000, due to the sale of both Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center in 1995 and
Menlo Center in 1996 and the assumption of related mortgage debt by the buyers
as well as the pay-down of short-term debt from the net proceeds of the sales.
In connection with the potential merger or joint venture activities,
the Trust incurred expenses of $230,000 in 1996 compared to $214,000 in 1995.
18
<PAGE>
Lease termination in 1996 is due to a lease termination in regards to
parcel land at the Westwood Village Shopping Center located Redding, California
(see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements).
The aggregate lease-up rate for two of the Trust's three properties
(excluding El Portal) was approximately 94% at December 31, 1996 and 97% at
December 31, 1995. At Monterey Plaza, the lease-up rate was 95%, while actual
occupancy rate was 39% because the WalMart store was under construction until
January 29, 1997. At King's Court the lease up rate and occupancy rate at
December 31, 1996 was 93%. At a third property (Wanlass) the lease-up rate
and occupancy rate was 28%. This property is proposed for redevelopment. The
aggregate occupancy rate for the Trust's overall shopping center portfolio
(excluding El Portal) at December 31, 1996 was 53%.
COMPARISON OF YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
During 1995 the Trust continued its efforts to recapitalize through a
variety of ways, including joint venture or merger with a compatible real
estate partner. The chief impediment was rising yield expectations of
potential institutional investor partners. In addition, the process has been
hindered by the problems at El Portal Shopping Center and the unresolved
HomeBase vacancy at Monterey Plaza, as well as the toxic pollution at King's
Court Shopping Center. In order to meet its debt obligations and improve its
earnings from operations, the Trust sold its Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center in
March 1995 and Menlo Center in February 1996.
In the course of generating proposals that culminated in the sale of
Lakeshore Plaza, the Trust's property portfolio was formally exposed to the
investment market. This exposure elicited several offers which were predicated
on estimates of value for all the Trust's properties with the exception of the
El Portal Shopping Center. El Portal was not a candidate for sale in this
manner because of the losses in its tenant structure and its redevelopment
needs. As a result of these estimates of value generated in competitive formal
bids and subsequent informal negotiations, the Trustees were able to assess the
probable current market value of most of its property portfolio. This had not
previously been possible due to the dearth of comparable property transactions
in the Bay Area since the decline of the real estate markets during the recent
recession. El Portal's value was estimated separately.
The estimated current market value information gathered in the
process described above led the Trustees to the decision to adjust the Trust's
book values to more closely reflect these current market values. The aggregate
of these write-downs at December 31, 1994 was $8,000,000. The details of the
amount of each adjustment are contained in the notes to the Trust's
consolidated financial statements.
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1995 was $3,448,000 as
compared to a net loss of $8,254,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994, a
decrease in the loss of $4,806,000. This decrease was caused by a decrease in
interest expense of $3,137,000 and a loss on impairment of property value of
$8,000,000 offset by the early termination of a lease which resulted in a net
gain of $3,578,000 after giving effect to writing off the remaining book value
of the building and associated tenant improvements leased by the former tenant,
the sale of options on four shopping center properties which resulted in a net
gain of $994,000, a one time loan commitment fee expensed in 1993 which did not
recur in 1994 and $1,400,000 increase in operating income.
Rental revenues decreased from $12,417,000 to $9,183,000, a decrease
of $3,234,000, or 26%, primarily as a result of the sale of Lakeshore Plaza
Shopping Center and declining revenues at El Portal Shopping Center as a result
of the HomeBase lease termination in 1994.
Operating expenses decreased from $2,162,000 in 1994 to $2,145,000 in
1995, a decrease of $17,000, or 1% due to additional expense of El Portal
ground lease and offset by a decrease in Lakeshore Plaza expense due to the
sale of the center.
Property taxes increased from $953,000 in 1994 to $1,194,000 in 1995,
an increase of $241,000, or 25%. due to supplemental bills at Monterey Plaza
Shopping Center. Property management fees decreased from $456,000 in 1994 to
$318,000 in 1995, a decrease of $138,000, or 30%. Depreciation and
amortization decreased from $3,862,000 in 1994 to $2,886,000 in 1995, a
decrease of $976,000 or 25%. Each of these decreases resulted from the sale
Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center.
19
<PAGE>
General and administrative expenses decreased from $854,000 in 1994
to $609,000 in 1995, a decrease of $245,000 due to cost saving measures.
Interest income decreased by $396,000, or 38% from $1,033,000 to
$637,000, as a result of the early repayment of two mortgage notes receivable
during 1994.
Interest expense decreased by $2,866,000, or 35%, from $8,230,000 to
$5,364,000, due to a pay-down on the El Portal mortgage, the assumption of
related mortgage from the sale of Lakeshore Plaza and the pay-down of short-
term debt.
In connection with a prospective offering of debt or equity
securities, potential merger or joint venture activities, the potential
acquisition of additional properties, and the proposed reincorporation as a
Maryland Corporation, the Trust incurred expenses of $214,000 in 1995 as
compared to $1,159,000 in 1994. These expenses were offset in part by a profit
of $994,000 in 1994 on the sale of property options acquired during this
effort.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash flow provided by operating activities was $364,000 in 1996,
compared to cash flow used by operating activities of $1,759,000 in 1995 and
$3,930,000 provided in 1994. The increase in 1996 was primarily due to reduced
expense resulting from property sales. The decrease in 1995 was primarily due
to a one-time lease termination fee received in 1994 at one property.
Cash flow provided by investing activities was $4,577,000 in 1996, as
compared to cash flow provided by investing activities in 1995 of $13,697,000
and $5,513,000 provided in 1994. The reduction in cash flow in 1996 compared
to 1995 was primarily due to timing differences in the receipt of rents and
payments of trade payables. The decrease in cash flow in 1995 compared to 1994
was due to the early payoff of three mortgage notes payable paid early as a
result of refinancing and also due to a mortgage loan pay-down due to the
HomeBase lease buy-out at El Portal Shopping Center.
Cash flow used by financing activities was $4,238,000 in 1996 as
compared to $12,296,000 used in 1995 and $9,633,000 used in 1994. The decrease
in 1996 is due to assumption of a smaller amount of mortgage debt and short-
term notes payable as the result of the sale of Menlo Center compared to the
assumption of a larger value of mortgage debt and short-term notes payable due
to the sale of Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center in 1995.
The Trust's financial structure at December 31, 1996 shows debt
financing, including short-term and unsecured notes, representing approximately
78% of the book value of the Trust's properties, before depreciation. The
increase in leverage from the level of 68% in 1995 is primarily due to the
Trust's use of the proceeds from the sale of Menlo Center to pay off the Menlo
Center mortgage note and $4,100,000 of short term notes, as well as the
exclusion of El Portal Shopping Center due to receivership.
The Trust is obligated on a number of short-term secured Notes due in
1997. Menlo Management Company and/or Collier Investments is the general
partner of the partnership lenders which hold these short-term mortgage notes.
The aggregate balance owed on these Notes is $7,700,000 at December 31, 1996.
These notes have the capacity to be increased to a total indebtedness of
$8,050,000 and are scheduled to mature on December 31, 1997. The Trust has the
intention and ability to obtain extensions on the maturity dates of these
notes.
Sources of liquidity for the Trust include five mortgage loans
receivable, totaling approximately $6,103,000 at December 31, 1996. Two of
these loans result from the sale of properties prior to 1991. Payments on these
notes are due as follows: $1,104,000 in December 1997 and $4,200,000 in
January 1999. The balance of $1,325,000 of these notes matures in 2000.
The Trust has engaged in formal negotiations during 1994, 1995 and
1996 regarding restructuring the Trust and the sale of certain Trust
properties. For further discussion see Item I Business - Investment Policy.
20
<PAGE>
There has been no public market for Trust Shares, nor have there been
any known market-makers. From time to time, in order to provide shareholders
with a means of trading Trust Shares, Pacific Real Estate Securities Co., Inc.
(Presco) has acted as a crossing agent on behalf of the Trust so that persons
interested in acquiring Trust Shares could purchase Trust Shares from persons
interested in selling Trust Shares. Presco ceased to function in this capacity
in 1992 and the company has since been wound up. The price of Trust Shares
sold by the Trust and selling shareholders was determined by the Trustees,
based on their estimate of the value of the Trust's properties and other assets
net of estimated liabilities, with the properties being valued based on
estimates of the long-term investment value of each property, rather than on
current market value or liquidation value, assuming that the properties were
held as long-term assets rather than being sold in mid-term or liquidated in
currently depressed market conditions. This valuation approach assumed that
the Trust would continue as a "going concern", and did not take into account
then current market value or liquidation value and costs of liquidation. All
existing shareholders who resided in California were given the opportunity to
purchase shares in cross-selling transactions.
JOINT VENTURE INTEREST
The Trust presently owns a 40% interest in Kingsco, the general
partnership which owns King's Court Shopping Center. In addition, the Trust
has managing control over King's Court Shopping Center operations, including
any leasing, renovation, sale or financing activities. The term of the
partnership continues until September 30, 2039. Cash flows and expenses of the
partnership are allocated in accordance with the partners' respective
percentage interests, with the Trust's allocation being equal to its 40%
interest. The shopping center is managed by Menlo Management Company on behalf
of the Trust; the Trust does not receive any portion of the management fee paid
to Menlo Management Company for such management services.
OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
At the present time, there are no material deferred capital
maintenance obligations outstanding for two of the Trust's existing shopping
centers. However, the Trust expects that several of its buildings at the
Wanlass Shopping Center may require significant capital investment in 1997. As
a result of the problems arising at El Portal Shopping Center the buildings at
El Portal have not been maintained on a current basis throughout all of 1996.
In addition, at each of the Trust's properties leasehold improvements and lease
commissions are expected to be incurred in connection with leasing activity.
No detailed capital budgets have been prepared for these items.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
In the last several years, inflation has not had a significant impact
on the Trust because of the relatively low inflation rate. Nonetheless, the
majority of the Trust's leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the
adverse impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses enabling the
Trust to receive percentage rents which generally increase as prices rise,
and/or escalation clauses which are typically related to increases in the
Consumer Price Index or similar inflation indices. Most of the Trust's leases
require the tenant to pay its share of operating expenses, including common
area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing the Trust's
exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
However, the Trust has agreed in certain instances to retain or limit the
responsibility for some obligations that would otherwise be the responsibility
of the tenant under a triple net lease.
The United States generally and the State of California are currently
enjoying economic growth. This growth comes on the heels of recent deep
economic recession, particularly in the State of California. However many
industries in the State of California continue to show the effect of this
recent recession. A repeat of these adverse changes in general or local
economic conditions could result in the inability of some existing tenants of
the Trust to meet their lease obligations and could adversely affect the
Trust's ability to attract or retain tenants. In addition to economic
conditions there are other major influences that can affect the success of
tenants in achieving or maintaining sufficient sales volumes to pay rent.
Competitive factors and overall changes in retail merchandising practices can
have an equal or even greater impact than economic factors. The loss of an
anchor retailer can lead to the diminution of retail sales and the loss of
other retailers in the same shopping center. This can seriously affect the
viability or value of a shopping center, as is particularly evident at El
Portal Shopping Center and, to a lesser extent, at Monterey Plaza Shopping
Center.
21
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Independent Auditors' Report 23
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1995 24
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 25
Statements of Changes in Shareholders'
Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994 26
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 27
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 28
Financial Statement Schedules:
III -- Commercial Properties and
Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 1996 36
IV -- Mortgage Loans on Real Estate at
December 31, 1996 38
Financial statements and supplemental financial statement schedules not
included have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which
they are required or because the information is included elsewhere in this
report.
22
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Trustees and Shareholders of Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of
Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Trust") and its joint venture
listed in the foregoing table of contents. Our audits also included the
financial statement schedules listed in the foregoing table of contents.
These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Trust and its joint
venture at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also,
in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information shown therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
January 24, 1997 (March 25, 1997 as to Note 12)
23
<PAGE>
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
-------------------
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Investment in commercial properties:
Land.................................................... $ 10,104,000 $ 14,308,000
Buildings and improvements.............................. 28,187,000 56,345,000
Accumulated depreciation................................. (7,271,000) (18,375,000)
------------- ------------
Commercial properties - net............................. 31,020,000 52,278,000
Property in receivership.................................. 4,438,000
Notes receivable (net of allowance of $507,000 in 1996 and
$39,000 in 1995).......................................... 6,279,000 6,811,000
Cash...................................................... 1,011,000 308,000
Restricted cash........................................... 1,154,000 100,000
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $143,000 in 1996
and $146,000 in 1995)..................................... 489,000 891,000
Deferred lease commissions - net.......................... 425,000 742,000
Deferred financing costs - net............................ 329,000 440,000
Other assets.............................................. 1,038,000 1,305,000
------------- ------------
Total................................................. $ 46,183,000 $ 62,875,000
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgage loans.......................................... $ 25,700,000 $ 36,818,000
Short-term notes........................................ 7,700,000 11,190,000
Security deposits....................................... 118,000 231,000
Accounts payable and other liabilities.................. 1,968,000 566,000
------------- ------------
Total liabilities..................................... $ 35,486,000 $ 48,805,000
------------- ------------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)...................
Minority interest in joint venture........................ 3,375,000 3,321,000
Shareholders' Equity:
Shares of beneficial interest, $10 par value, authorized:
1996 and 1995, 10,611,863; shares issued and
outstanding: 1996 and 1995, 3,706,845 37,068,000 37,068,000
Additional paid-in capital................................ 11,009,000 11,009,000
Accumulated deficit....................................... (40,755,000) (37,328,000)
------------- ------------
Shareholders' equity...................................... 7,322,000 10,749,000
------------- ------------
Total................................................. $ 46,183,000 $ 62,875,000
------------- ------------
------------- ------------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
<PAGE>
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
--------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental revenues....................................... $ 5,780,000 $ 9,183,000 $12,417,000
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating expenses (including related party
amounts of $478,000, $694,000 and $996,000 in
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively):
Operating............................................ 1,619,000 2,145,000 2,162,000
Property tax......................................... 483,000 1,194,000 953,000
General and administrative........................... 520,000 609,000 854,000
Depreciation and amortization........................ 2,062,000 2,886,000 3,862,000
Property management fees............................. 197,000 318,000 456,000
Loss on impairment of value.......................... 1,455,000 8,000,000
Gain on sale of property............................. (772,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses........................... 5,564,000 7,152,000 16,287,000
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income (loss)............................... 216,000 2,031,000 (3,870,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
Other income/(expense):
Interest income...................................... 645,000 637,000 1,033,000
Interest expense..................................... (3,404,000) (5,364,000) (8,230,000)
Gain (loss) on sale of options....................... (213,000) 994,000
Reincorporation/merger expenses...................... (230,000) (139,000) (355,000)
Property acquisition expenses........................ (75,000) (503,000)
Expenses of prospective offering..................... (301,000)
Prepayment penalty................................... (271,000)
Gain (loss) on lease termination..................... (240,000) 3,577,000
----------- ----------- -----------
Total other expense--net........................... (3,229,000) (5,154,000) (4,056,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss before minority interest..................... (3,013,000) (3,123,000) (7,926,000)
Minority interest in joint venture.................... (414,000) (325,000) (328,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss.............................................. $(3,427,000) $(3,448,000) $(8,254,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss per share of beneficial interest............. $ (0.92) $ (0.93) $ (2.23)
----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
<PAGE>
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
--------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BENEFICIAL INTEREST
------------------------------ ADDITIONAL ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT PAID-IN CAPITAL DEFICIT
------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance January 1, 1994............. 3,707,072 $37,071,000 $11,010,000 $(25,626,000)
Repurchase of shares................ (227) (3,000) (1,000)
Net Loss............................ (8,254,000)
------------ --------------- ----------------- ---------------
Balance December 31, 1994........... 3,706,845 37,068,000 11,009,000 (33,880,000)
Net Loss............................ (3,448,000)
------------ --------------- ----------------- ---------------
Balance December 31, 1995........... 3,706,845 37,068,000 11,009,000 (37,328,000)
Net Loss............................ (3,427,000)
------------ --------------- ----------------- ---------------
Balance December 31, 1996........... 3,706,845 $37,068,000 $11,009,000 $(40,755,000)
------------ --------------- ----------------- ---------------
------------ --------------- ----------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
<PAGE>
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
-------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
Net loss............................................. $ (3,427,000) $ (3,448,000) $ (8,254,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation......................................... 1,716,000 2,496,000 3,290,000
Amortization of note receivable discount............. (15,000) (64,000) (34,000)
Amortization of deferred cost........................ 343,000 359,000 570,000
Minority interest in joint venture's operations...... 414,000 325,000 328,000
Provision for doubtful receivables................... 77,000 103,000 161,000
Loss (gain) on sale of options....................... 213,000 (994,000)
Gain on sale of property............................. (772,000)
Loss (gain) on lease termination..................... 240,000 (3,578,000)
Proceeds from lease termination...................... 6,000,000
Loss on impairment value............................. 1,455,000 8,000,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and other liabilities............. 117,000 (1,107,000) (501,000)
Security deposits.................................. 10,000 (60,000) (38,000)
Deferred lease commissions......................... (105,000) (97,000) (217,000)
Deferred financing costs........................... (25,000)
Accounts receivable................................ 293,000 (238,000) (417,000)
Other assets....................................... 43,000 (241,000) (386,000)
------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities...... 364,000 (1,759,000) 3,930,000
------------- ------------- --------------
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Increase in restricted cash.......................... (100,000)
Construction of properties........................... (347,000) (107,000) (1,491,000)
Collection of notes receivable....................... 88,000 78,000 6,030,000
Additions of notes receivable........................ (9,000) (4,000) (1,327,000)
Proceeds from sale of Lakeshore...................... 14,043,000
Proceeds from sale of Menlo Center................... 4,845,000
Proceeds (costs) from sale of options................ (213,000) 2,301,000
------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash provided in investing activities............. 4,577,000 13,697,000 5,513,000
------------- ------------- --------------
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Costs of sale of Trust Shares........................ (4,000)
Proceeds from short-term notes....................... 910,000 800,000 3,905,000
Proceeds from mortgage loans......................... 1,500,000
Re-payment of mortgage loans......................... (388,000) (4,691,000) (9,712,000)
Re-payment of short-term notes....................... (4,400,000) (5,045,000) (4,810,000)
Re-payment of unsecured note payable................. (3,000,000)
Payment of financing costs........................... (152,000)
Distributions to joint venture partner............... (360,000) (360,000) (360,000)
------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash used by financing activities................. (4,238,000) (12,296,000) (9,633,000)
------------- ------------- --------------
Increase (decrease) in cash........................... 703,000 (358,000) (190,000)
Cash, January 1...................................... 308,000 666,000 856,000
------------- ------------- --------------
Cash, December 31.................................... $ 1,011,000 $ 308,000 $ 666,000
------------- ------------- --------------
------------- ------------- --------------
</TABLE>
NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING:
Assumption of mortgage note payable by buyers of Lakeshore Plaza Shopping
Center for $15,826,000 in 1995 and Menlo Center for $10,730,000 in 1996.
Establishment of an impound account for approximately $1,000,000 for a
Monterey Plaza Shopping Center tenant during 1996, which was funded by another
tenant. (see Note 1).
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
<PAGE>
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES.
ORGANIZATION
Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Trust") is a trust organized
under the laws of the State of California. The Trust is an investment
vehicle whose purpose is to acquire, hold for investment, and ultimately
sell, interests in neighborhood and community shopping centers and commercial
property in selected Northern California metropolitan areas. The Trust has
qualified and intends to continue to qualify as a real estate investment
trust under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the Trust and a joint
venture ("Kingsco") in which the Trust has a 40% controlling interest. The
joint venture is consolidated in the accompany financial statements as the
Trust has control over the joint venture's operations, including all leasing,
renovation, sale or refinancing activities. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
During 1996, the Trust implemented Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for Long Lived-Assets to Be Disposed Of." This new standard was used to
determine the 1996 loss on impairment of value as described in Note 10.
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
PROPERTIES
Properties are stated at the lower of depreciated cost or estimated
realizable value from the operation and ultimate sale of such properties.
Acquisition fees and interest incurred during construction periods are
capitalized. Property and improvements acquired by the Trust in connection
with its acquisition of a controlling interest in a joint venture are stated
at amounts agreed upon among the partners at the date of acquisition which
approximated market value at such date. Depreciation is computed by the
straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to forty
years. Properties and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from
the accounts at the time of sale. The related gain or loss is included in
the statement of operations. The determination of estimated realizable value
involves subjective judgement because the actual market value of real estate
can be determined only by negotiation between the parties in a sales
transaction.
RESTRICTED CASH
Restricted cash primarily consists of amounts held in an impound account
for a Monterey Plaza tenant as a result of the tenant agreeing to waive its
exclusive rights to sell certain products in the Plaza. The entire balance
of this impound account is payable to such tenant, the timing of which is
specified in its amended lease. The impound account was funded by another
tenant at the Plaza and the funds were placed in the impound account under
the control of the Trust and Prudential Insurance Company of American, the
Lender on the First Deed of Trust.
28
<PAGE>
DEFERRED LEASE COMMISSIONS
Deferred lease commissions are amortized on a straight-line basis over
the lives of the related leases, which range from two to forty years.
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS
Deferred financing costs represent loan fees and points paid to obtain
certain mortgage financing. These amounts are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the lives of the related loans which range from six to ten years.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets are primarily composed of expected reimbursements related
to the clean up at Kings Courts Shopping Center (see Note 14) and rental
revenues in excess of amounts currently billed. Certain lease agreements
contain provisions for fixed rent increases for future periods and for
periods of rent abatement during the earliest portion of such leases. Rental
revenue from such leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
lives of the related leases.
PROPERTY ACQUISITION EXPENSE
Property acquisition expense represents costs associated with
investigating properties which were not subsequently acquired.
INCOME TAXES
The Internal Revenue Code provides that a trust qualifies as a real
estate investment trust if, among other things, the trust distributes each
year at least 95% of its taxable income to shareholders. If the Trust
distributes at least 95% of its taxable income to shareholders, such
distributions can be treated as deductions by the Trust for income tax
purposes. Because it is the policy of the Trust to distribute amounts
approximately equal to its taxable income plus depreciation and amortization,
no provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial
statements.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying amounts of receivables and short-term notes payable are
reasonable estimates of fair value due to the short period of time until
their expected maturity. The carrying amount of mortgage loans is a
reasonable estimate of fair value based on the borrowing rates currently
available to the Trust for loans with similar terms and average maturities.
NET LOSS PER SHARE OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
Net loss per share of beneficial interest, is computed by dividing net
loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 3,706,845 in
1996, 1995 and 1994.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain 1995 and 1994 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the
1996 presentation.
2. INVESTMENT ADVISOR, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND SHAREHOLDER-SUPPORT SERVICES
AGREEMENTS
The Trust has entered into certain transactions with Collier Investment
(the "Advisor"), which is both the investment advisor to the Trust and its
real estate broker. Menlo Management Company, which manages the Trust's
properties, and is formerly affiliated with the Advisor. Robert C. Gould, an
officer and director of the Trust, is the owner of Menlo Management Company.
California Bavarian Company, a privately held California corporation,
provides shareholder communication and liaison support services to the Trust
on a contractual basis
29
<PAGE>
for a monthly service fee. California Bavarian Company is not related to the
Trust. However its director, Mark D. Mordell, is an agent of the Trust.
The amended investment advisory agreement provides that, commencing
January 1, 1994, the Trust pays to the Advisor, an annual base advisory fee
equal to 0.2% of the average gross invested assets of the Trust (as defined
in the advisory agreement). The Advisor also may receive real estate
brokerage commissions at negotiated rates in connection with the purchase,
sale or refinancing of the Trust's properties. In July 1994 the Advisor
offered to reduce the annual base advisory fee by 50% retroactive to January
1, 1994. The Investment Advisor also voluntarily waived real estate
brokerage commissions in connection with both the sale of Lakeshore Plaza
Shopping Center, which was sold on March 13, 1995, and the sale of Menlo
Center, which was sold on February 29, 1996.
The investment advisory agreement also provides for a yearly incentive
compensation payment to the Advisor equal to the sum of: (1) 10% of net
realized capital gains, excluding any depreciation, less accumulated realized
capital losses, if any; plus (2) 7.5% of the amount, if any, by which net
income, before depreciation but excluding capital gains, exceeded a minimum
base yield of 8.6% per annum on average net worth (as defined in the
agreement) during the preceding calendar year. Net income for this purpose
is after deduction of the regular fee, whether or not such fees were paid.
No incentive compensation fees were paid to the Advisor in 1996, 1995 or 1994.
The Trust has a property management agreement with Menlo Management
Company to manage the Trust's properties for a percentage of gross rentals
ranging from 4% to 5% for each property. In addition, for each property,
Menlo Management Company receives leasing commissions based on a percentage
of the total lease rental revenues, with certain minimum commission charges.
Menlo Management Company is the lessee of office space in one of the Trust's
properties which was sold in 1996. The Trustees believe that the terms of
the lease and property management agreements are comparable to terms the
Trust would obtain from non-related parties.
Menlo Management Company receives fees for administrative services
provided to the Trust and development, planning and negotiating services in
connection with development work at the Trust's properties.
Pacific Real Estate Securities Company Inc.("Presco") is a former
supplier of capital fund raising and shareholder services to the Trust. This
company was a subsidiary of Menlo Management Company. It was dissolved in
1995.
Fees paid or payable to the Advisor, Menlo Management Company and Presco
in 1996, 1995 and 1994 were as follows:
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- -----------
ADVISOR
Advisory fee........................ $ 50,000 $ 68,000 $ 112,000
MENLO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Property management fees............ 197,000 313,000 456,000
Administrative services............. 150,000 199,000 260,000
Loan fees........................... 81,000 114,000 132,000
Lease commissions................... 82,000 68,000 126,000
Real estate brokerage commissions... 145,000
PRESCO
Administrative services............. 36,000
---------- ---------- -----------
Total............................ $ 560,000 $ 762,000 $ 1,267,000
---------- ---------- -----------
---------- ---------- -----------
Real estate brokerage commissions have been capitalized and lease
commissions have been deferred.
30
<PAGE>
3. NOTES RECEIVABLE.
Notes receivable consist of the following at December 31, 1996 and December
31, 1995:
1996 1995
---------- ----------
Mortgage notes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,571,000 $6,565,000
Unsecured loans (principally to tenants). . 215,000 285,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . (507,000) (39,000)
---------- ----------
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,279,000 $6,811,000
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
The mortgage notes outstanding at December 31, 1996 result from sale of
two shopping center properties located in Northern California which bear
interest from 9% to 9.25% and from other loans (see Note 11). At the time of
sale, the two shopping center notes were discounted to yield market interest
rates ranging from 9.5% to 13%. The discounts are recognized as interest
income over the life of the note. The mortgage notes receivable have been
pledged as security for various short-term notes payable (see Note 4).
Notes receivable are due as follows:
1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,133,000
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,000
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,216,000
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,330,000
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . 143,000
Less discounts . . . . . . . . (58,000)
Less allowance for bad debt. . (507,000)
----------
Total . . . . . . . . . . $6,279,000
----------
----------
The debtor of a note scheduled to mature in December 1996 requested an
extension to December 1997 and the Trust granted this extension. During
1996, the Trust wrote down this note by $468,000 due to a decline in the
value of the underlying collateral and management's estimate of the notes
realizable value (see Note 10).
4. SHORT-TERM NOTES.
At December 31, 1996, notes outstanding are $7,700,000, with interest
rates ranging from 9.50% to 10.20%. The notes have the capacity to be
increased to a total indebtedness of $8,050,000 and are secured by mortgage
notes receivable from property sales (see Note 3), additional deeds of trust
on existing properties and the Trust's interest in a joint venture. All of
these notes at December 31, 1996 are held by private limited partnerships,
independent of the Trust, in which Menlo Management Company and/or Collier
Investments has a general partnership interest. Interest of $790,000,
$1,163,000 and $1,442,000 was paid on these notes in 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. The notes are scheduled to mature in December 1997. The Trust
has the intention and ability to obtain extensions on the maturity dates on
these notes.
5. MORTGAGE LOANS.
Operating properties are pledged as collateral for mortgage loans which
have interest rates varying from 9.375% to 10.25% at December 31, 1996. The
loans are payable monthly over periods through July 2000. In connection with
the sale of one property in 1990, the Trust remains the primary obligor on
the underlying non-recourse note payable, totaling $1,542,000, which is
secured by a first deed of trust on the property sold. The all-inclusive
promissory note receivable from the buyer was received by the Trust at the
date of sale.
Mortgage loans mature in future years as follows:
1997. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,743,000
1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332,000
1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,782,000
2000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,843,000
-----------
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,700,000
-----------
-----------
31
<PAGE>
The 1997 maturities shown above include $4,438,000 due on the property
in receivership (see Note 7).
Total interest costs in 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $3,404,000, $5,364,000
and $8,230,000. Interest paid was $3,404,000, $5,364,000 and $8,501,000,
respectively.
6. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OPERATING LEASES.
Space in the Trust's operating properties is leased to tenants under
long-term non-cancelable operating leases. The lease agreements provide for
fixed minimum rentals and generally include provisions for reimbursement of a
portion of common area maintenance expenses, property taxes, insurance, and
percentage rents. Minimum rentals under these leases at December 31, 1996
are as follows (excluding the property in receivership):
1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,475,000
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,193,000
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,986,000
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,891,000
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,644,000
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . 14,117,000
-----------
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . $29,306,000
-----------
-----------
Rental revenues in 1996, 1995 and 1994 included $201,000, $153,000 and
$196,000 of contingent rentals based on individual tenants' sales volumes.
For the years ending December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 rental revenues
representing 31% in 1996, 14% in 1995 and 17% in 1994, of total revenues were
earned from a single tenant at one of the Trust's properties in 1996 and 1995
and at two of the Trust's properties in 1994.
7. EL PORTAL SHOPPING CENTER.
In December 1994, HomeBase, an anchor tenant at El Portal Shopping
Center reached an agreement with the Trust whereby in exchange for a lease
termination the Trust accepted a $6,000,000 lease buy-out payment. Under the
terms of the mortgage loan secured by the property, $5,729,000 of this lease
buy-out was applied towards the principal reduction and $271,000 was applied
as a prepayment penalty. In connection with this transaction, the Trust
determined that the HomeBase facility became functionally obsolete, therefore
the remaining book value of $2,040,000 and associated deferred costs of
$383,000 were charged against the lease termination payment resulting in a
net gain of $3,577,000.
Between 1994 through 1996 El Portal suffered a complete reversal arising
from the loss or closure of all of its anchor tenants. The resultant cash
drain from the property prompted the Trust to suspend making any further
mortgage payments to the Trust Deed Non-Recourse Note Holder, Nationwide Life
Insurance Company. The unpaid balance of the mortgage loan was $4,438,000 at
December 31, 1996. The lender accordingly sought to place the property in
receivership as a prerequisite to obtaining fee title to the property. This
step was also prompted by the discovery in 1995 of a toxic spill emanating
from a former dry cleaner tenant, which probably occurred prior to the
Trust's acquisition of the property. The property was officially confirmed
into permanent receivership in January 1997. The Trust expects that there is
no residual equity for the Trust in the El Portal Shopping Center and, during
1996, wrote down the carrying value by $987,000 (see Note 10).
32
<PAGE>
8. SALE OF LAKESHORE PLAZA.
The Trust sold the Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center on March 13, 1995 for
a sales price of $31,292,000. The proceeds of this sale after provision for
assumption of the existing First Deed of Trust financing ($15,826,000 at
March 13, 1995), repayment of second mortgage ($4,000,000), closing costs,
escrow holdbacks for supplemental property taxes, vacant spaces and pending
tenant improvement allowances, legal fees, transfer taxes and miscellaneous
selling expenses, were all used to pay down other short-term notes ($5,045,000)
and an unsecured note payable including interest payable ($3,467,000). The loss
on sale was recognized in 1994 (see Note 10).
9. SALE OF MENLO CENTER.
The Trust sold Menlo Center on February 29, 1996. The sales price was
$16,200,000. The buyer assumed the existing financing in the amount of
$10,730,000. After payment of closing costs, transfer taxes, real estate
commissions and miscellaneous selling expenses, all totalling approximately
$445,000, the net proceeds of approximately $4,845,000 were used to repay
short-term debt and to provide working capital. Under the terms of the sale
contract, the Trust is obligated to subsidize the buyer's net operating
income to the extent necessary to assure the buyer of an 8.5% investment
yield from the operation of Menlo Center. The liability for this subsidy
amounted to $37,000 in 1996. No liability is currently expected for 1997 and
thereafter. The Trust's liability in this respect extends to the maturity
date of the existing First Trust Deed financing which the buyer assumed in
the purchase. This financing expires in 2000.
10. LOSS ON IMPAIRMENT OF VALUE.
In 1994, the Trustees decided to reduce the carrying value of two of the
Trust's properties to reflect their estimated current market value more
accurately. Accordingly, Menlo Center's carrying value was reduced by
$3,600,000 to $15,000,000 after depreciation. Lakeshore Plaza Shopping
Center's carrying value was reduced by $3,500,000 and an additional $900,000
related to deferred lease commissions and financing costs.
In 1996, loss on impairment of value is comprised of the following
components. First, El Portal Shopping Center's carrying value was reduced by
$987,000 to $4,438,000 after depreciation (see Note 7). Second, the Trust's
interest in the Westwood Village Note was written down by $468,000 to
$600,000 (see Note 3).
11. PROPERTY PURCHASE OPTIONS.
The Trust entered into a purchase and sale agreement in 1993 (the "1993
Agreement") and three additional purchase and sale agreements in 1994 (the
"1994 Agreements") to purchase a total of four shopping centers.
In 1994 the Trust assigned its interest in the 1993 Agreement and the
1994 Agreements to another real estate investment trust for the sum of
$2,361,000, adjusted for certain closing costs and prorations. The Trust
also guaranteed the payment of certain rentals at the properties to the buyer
for a 24-month period.
During 1994, the Trust recorded a gain of $994,000 net of a rent
guarantee reserve accrual of $390,000, as the result the above transaction. In
1995, the Trust increased the reserve by an additional $213,000.
In connection with the above transactions, on June 7, 1994, (i)
Scotts Valley Plaza, a California limited partnership ("Scott"), granted to
the Trust a one-year option to acquire the shopping center commonly known as
Scotts Village Plaza and (ii) Scotts Village Phase II, a California limited
partnership ("Scotts II"), granted a one-year option to the Trust to purchase
Scotts Valley Square, both of which are located in Scotts Valley, California.
Concurrently with the grant of these options and in connection with the
transactions contemplated by that certain Assignment and Agreement dated May
9 1994 and amended May 25, 1994, executed by and between Pacific Real Estate
Investment Trust and Western Investment Real Estate Trust, the Trust made a
loan to Malcolm R. Riley, one of the principals in Scotts and Scotts II, in
the amount of $750,000. The loan bears interest at 9% per annum, payable
monthly, and the principal is due and payable in 6 years. Simultaneously,
the Trust made a loan to Russell R. Pratt, in the amount of $500,000. That
loan bears interest at 8% per annum, payable monthly, and the principal is
due and payable in 6 years. Each of these loans is secured by the borrower's
respective partnership interests in Scotts and Scotts II. The Trust also
made a loan in the amount of $75,000 to Scotts, which bears interest at 8.6%
per annum (payable monthly), is due in 6 years and is secured by a second
deed of trust on Scotts Village Plaza. Payment on these notes are current.
12. Reincorporation/Merger Transactions.
The Trustees have formed Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
("PAC REIT") as a Maryland corporation for the purpose of effecting a
reincorporation (the "Reincorporation Transactions"). PAC REIT has no
material assets or liabilities and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Trust.
The Trust held a Special Meeting
33
<PAGE>
of the Shareholders on March 18, 1994, at which time the Reincorporation
Transactions were approved by the Trust's shareholders. The Trust does not
currently expect to effect the Reincorporation Transactions.
On January 10, 1997, the Trust entered into a definitive merger
agreement with Pan Pacific Development (U.S.) Inc. whereby both entities
agreed to contribute certain properties into a subsidiary of the Trust,
Pacific Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. On March 25, 1997, the agreement
was terminated for failure of certain conditions. The Trustees will continue
to pursue alternative sources of financing or an alternative approach
involving the orderly sale of the Trust's assets.
13. EXPENSES OF PROSPECTIVE OFFERING.
During 1994 the Trust was involved in discussions with underwriters
regarding a potential offering of the PAC REIT's Common Shares and/or debt
securities to public or private purchasers, should the Reincorporation
Transactions be consummated. The expenses incurred in connection with such a
prospective offering are reflected in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations as expenses of prospective offering.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.
The Trust is obligated on four land leases. The first lease extends
through 2012 and requires minimum annual payments of $26,000, plus 8% of the
property's rental revenue in excess of $325,000. The second lease extends
through 2024 and requires minimum annual payments of $40,000, plus 12% of the
property's annual rental revenue in excess of $333,000. The third lease
extends through 2045 and contains a dual option for the Trust to acquire fee
title and for the ground lessor to "put" the property to the Trust. The
option for the Trust to acquire commences upon the death of one of the ground
lessors and lasts for five years from said date. The option for the ground
lessors to "put" the property to the Trust begins March 1, 1998 and survives
through the term of the ground lease. The annual rent is $184,400 with
annual increases of 4%. The purchase price under the options is the minimum
ground rent capitalized at a 10% yield. Land lease expense totaled $381,000
in 1996, $400,000 in 1995, and $236,000 in 1994. The fourth lease extends
through December 31, 2007 and requires annual minimum rent payment of $45,000
plus real property taxes. This lease affects a parcel of land consisting of
5000 square feet and is located at the periphery of Westwood Village Shopping
Center in Redding, CA. The Trust sold this parcel to a third party in 1987
for a sale price of $440,000. The Trust leased the land back from the new
owner with the intent to sub-lease it to a retail or commercial user at a
ground rent equal to or greater than the ground rent payable by the Trust to
the buyer. The Trust has been unable to locate a ground lessee and it
estimates that the current market lease rate for this parcel has declined.
In order to eliminate the burden of the remaining eleven years of lease
payments, the Trust intends to terminate its lease prior to maturity and to
repurchase the land at its estimated current value of $200,000. The Limited
Partnership which owns the land has agreed to sell the parcel back to the
Trust in exchange for a payment equal to the current estimated value of the
land at $200,000 plus a lease termination fee of $240,000, based on the
present value of the rental commitment. The liability for the lease
termination fee has been accrued as of December 31, 1996.
In 1994, the Kingsco partnership initiated an environmental audit of the
property. The Phase I and II stages of the environmental audit identified
certain dry cleaning solvents which had contaminated the ground water beneath
the shopping center. Currently, a Phase III plan of remediation has been
prepared with a proposed plan of action for clean-up of the contamination
expected to be completed in approximately two years or longer. The cost to
Kingsco for the clean-up is estimated to be $1,032,000 of which $723,000 has
been expended through 1996. Reimbursements received from the insurance
company total $503,000. The Trust was not a partner of Kingsco at the time
the contamination occurred, and intends to look to the seller of the Trust's
40% interest in Kingsco, Kingsco's insurance carriers at the time of the
contamination, the other partners of Kingsco and the entity that caused the
contamination for payment of the clean-up costs. The Trust believes that the
representations and warranties made by the seller in the agreement pursuant
to which the Trust acquired its partnership interest give the Trust a cause
of action against the seller for the clean-up costs to the extent such costs
are not reimbursed by the insurance carriers. The interim plan of remediation
has been approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and remediation
has commenced. Accordingly, $309,000 and $529,000 is reflected in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1996 as Other
Liabilities and Other Assets respectively, for expected future costs and
reimbursements.
34
<PAGE>
In another, unrelated, environmental audit of the gasoline service
station pad ("Exxon Pad") at King's Court Shopping Center, the Phase I and II
work identified gasoline and possibly other service station by-products in the
soil underneath the station and its pumps. Exxon Corporation has assumed
financial and legal responsibility for the hazardous materials and remediation
of the Exxon Pad. The environmental firm responsible for maintaining and
analyzing the data from various monitoring wells on the Pad continues to report
to the Trust and governmental authorities on a quarterly basis. Remediation
efforts have commenced and include both vapor extraction and "pump and treat"
activities, depending upon the location of the materials in the soil and water.
The Trust has also become aware of a spill from a former dry cleaning
establishment at El Portal Shopping Center. This spill probably occurred
prior to the Trust's ownership of the property. The Contra Costa County
Regional Water Quality Control Board is currently reviewing the situation and
a clean-up remediation proposed by the Trust. The cost of clean-up and
timetable have not yet been finalized, however, based on current knowledge,
the cost is not expected to have a material effect on the Trust's financial
position. During 1996, the Trustees authorized remediation expenditure up to
$100,000. At December 31, 1996, Other Liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements include $100,000 for such costs.
The Trust ground leases a parcel of land in San Pablo, California (the
Wanlass property) which has been contaminated with a gasoline spill from an
adjacent property. The source of contamination has been identified and
Atlantic-Richfield Company, Inc. ("ARCO") has issued a letter of
indemnification for the Trust's benefit respecting all financial and legal
liability arising from this contamination.
At Monterey Plaza Shopping Center the Phase One Environmental Assessment
Report identified the possibility of oil and grease contamination in the soil
as well as possible residues of pesticides, herbicides and insecticides due
to prior agricultural use of the property. The property was acquired from
the State of California, which held title immediately prior to the Trust and
which would be liable for any such contamination. These possible hazardous
waste contaminations are not expected to be of material significance to the
Trust.
The Trust is in a dispute with WalMart concerning alleged deficiencies
in the tenant's premises at Monterey Plaza. The sum in question is
approximately $136,000 and represents roof and skylight repairs and upgrades.
The Trust has declined to accept responsibility for these items and is
contesting WalMart's claim of Landlord responsibilities. Trust management
does not expect the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on
the Trust.
15. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY.
In January 1992, the Trust began a Rights Offering, which entitled each
shareholder of record on December 31, 1991, to purchase an additional share
in the Trust for each share owned. The rights were exercisable at $13.68 per
share through March 20, 1992 when the offering expired. In addition, each
right was accompanied by one warrant which entitles the owner to purchase an
additional one-half share of beneficial interest for $7.00 during a two-year
period beginning January 1, 1995. (This is equivalent to a purchase price of
$14.00 for each whole share.) At December 31, 1996, 217,697 warrants,
covering 108,848.5 shares of beneficial interest, were issued and
outstanding. These warrants expired December 31, 1996.
35
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE III
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
-----------------
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D
COST CAPITALIZED
INITIAL COST SUBSEQUENT
TO TRUST(1) TO ACQUISITION
-------------------------- --------------------------
BUILDINGS
AND CARRYING
DESCRIPTION ENCUMBRANCES(3) LAND IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS COSTS
----------- -------------- ------ ----------- ------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES:
King's Court Shopping Center
Los Gatos, California . . . . 1,307,000 9,137,000 777,000
Monterey Plaza Shopping Center
San Jose, California . . . . 18,412,000 10,104,000 12,717,000 1,799,000 3,757,000
Mt. Shasta Shopping
Mt. Shasta, California(9) . . 1,543,000
----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
TOTAL 21,262,000 $ 10,104,000 $ 21,854,000 $ 2,576,000 $ 3,757,000
----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
COLUMN E COLUMN F COLUMN G COLUMN H
GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH CARRIED
AT CLOSE OF PERIOD(2)
------------------------------------
BUILDINGS ACCUMULATED
AND TOTAL DEPRECIATION DATE OF DATE
LAND IMPROVEMENTS (4) (5)(6) CONSTRUCTION ACQUIRED
-------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES:
King's Court Shopping Center
Los Gatos, California. . . . . . 9,914,000 9,914,000 4,130,000 (7) 12/86
Monterey Plaza Shopping Center
San Jose, California . . . . . . 10,104,000 18,273,000 28,377,000 3,141,000 (8) 7/87,1/88
4/88,7/88
Mt. Shasta Shopping 10/88,3/89
Mt. Shasta, California(9). . . .
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
$ 10,104,000 $ 28,187,000 $ 38,291,000 $ 7,271,000
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
</TABLE>
See notes on following page
36
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE III
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
--------------
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Notes:
<S> <C> <C>
(1) Construction costs incurred under the initial construction subsequent to purchase
of the land are included as initial cost to the Trust.
(2) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes excluding El
Portal Shopping Center property in receivership, is $34,077,000.
(3) Amount excludes $4,438,000 loan secured by property in receivership
at El Portal Shopping Center.
(4) Balance, January 1, 1994............................................ $ 110,145,000
Improvements capitalized subsequent to acquisition.................. 1,491,000
Retirements...................................................... (3,000,000)
--------------
Loss on impairment of property value............................. (7,100,000)
--------------
Balance, December 31, 1994.......................................... 101,536,000
Improvements capitalized subsequent to acquisition............... 108,000
Retirements...................................................... (30,991,000)
--------------
Balance, December 31, 1995.......................................... 70,653,000
Improvements capitalized subsequent to acquisition............... 347,000
Property in receivership......................................... (15,333,000)
Retirements...................................................... (17,376,000)
--------------
Balance, December 31, 1996.......................................... $ 38,291,000
--------------
--------------
(5) Balance, January 1, 1994............................................ $ 14,670,000
Additions charged to expense..................................... 3,290,000
Retirements...................................................... (960,000)
--------------
Balance, December 31, 1994.......................................... 17,000,000
Additions charged to expense..................................... 2,496,000
Retirements...................................................... (1,121,000)
--------------
Balance, December 31, 1995.......................................... 18,375,000
Additions charged to expense..................................... 1,716,000
Property in receivership......................................... (9,925,000)
Retirements...................................................... (2,895,000)
--------------
Balance, December 31, 1996.......................................... $ 7,271,000
--------------
--------------
(6) Depreciation is computed on lives ranging from three to forty years.
(7) This property is owned by a joint venture in which the Trust has a 40% controlling
interest.
(8) This property was acquired at various times and development was completed in 1991.
(9) This property has been sold, but the Trust remains primarily liable for the note
payable, which is secured by the property sold. An all-inclusive promissory note
receivable from the buyer was received by the Trust as the date of sale. Such
financing is commonly referred to as "wraparound" financing.
</TABLE>
37
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE IV
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
-------------
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E COLUMN F
INTEREST MATURITY PERIODIC FACE AMOUNT CARRYING AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION RATE DATE PAYMENT TERMS OF MORTGAGE OF MORTGAGE(1)(2)
- ------------------------------ --------- --------- ------------------------------------- --------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SECURED LOANS:
Westwood Shopping Center...... 9% 12/97 $7,967/mo. principal and interest. $ 5,375,000 $ 600,000 (3)
(Second mortgage secured by Balloon payment of $1,121,000 due
shopping center.) at maturity.
Mt. Shasta Shopping Center.... 9.25% 1/99 $32,375/mo. interest only. Balloon 4,200,000 4,178,000 (4)
(Wraparound second mortgage payment of $4,200,000 due at
secured by shopping center) maturity.
Scotts Valley Loans
Malcom Riley.................. 9% 6/2000 $5,625 750,000 750,000 (5)
Russell Pratt................. 8% 6/2000 $3,333 500,000 500,000 (5)
Scotts Valley Plaza........... 8.6% 6/2000 $537.50 75,000 75,000
------------- -------------
TOTAL SECURED LOANS $ 10,900,000 6,103,000
------------- -------------
------------- -------------
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Notes:
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(1) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purpose is $6,593,000.
(2) Balance, January 1, 1994......................... $11,130,000
Deductions during year:
Amortization of discount....................... 34,000
Additions...................................... 1,325,000
Collection of Principal........................ (5,974,000) (4,615,000)
------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1994..................... 6,515,000
Deductions during year:
Amortization of discount....................... 64,000
Collection of Principal........................ (14,000) 50,000
------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1995 6,565,000
Deductions during year:
Amortization of discount....................... 22,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts................ (468,000)
Collection of Principal........................ (16,000) (462,000)
------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1996..................... $ 6,103,000
-------------
-------------
(3) Net of discount of $37,000 based on an effective interest rate of 9.75% and allowance of
doubtful accounts of $468,000.
(4) Net discount of $22,000 based on an effective interest rate of 9.5%.
(5) Loans secured by interest in partnership which owns commercial real estate.
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
Mr. Wilcox Patterson, age 56, was elected a Trustee in 1980, and President
of the Trust in May 1985. Mr. Patterson is a director of Grove Farm Company,
Inc., a sugar plantation and real estate development corporation located on
Kauai in the Hawaiian Islands. He is also an independent real estate manager
and investor. Mr. Patterson served as Regional Vice President of Northern
California Savings and Loan Association between April 1979 and September
1980. Prior to that appointment, he served as a Vice President and Manager of
the Menlo Park branch of Northern California Savings and Loan Association.
In these capacities, he has gained considerable experience in real estate
financing.
Mr. John H. Hoefer, age 81, was elected a Trustee in 1982 and Vice
President in June 1988. Mr. Hoefer is a Rear Admiral, United States Naval
Reserve. He was founder of Hoefer, Dieterich and Brown, Inc., an advertising
agency in San Francisco, and was its Chairman at the time of its merger with
Chiat/Day, Inc. in 1979. He was also a Chairman of Chiat/Day, Inc. (San
Francisco).
Mr. Harry E. Kellogg, age 73, has served as a Trustee and Treasurer of the
Trust since the date of its inception and was an initial investor. Mr.
Kellogg was elected Executive Vice President of the Trust on December 5, 1978
and was President from February 1980 to May 1985. Mr. Kellogg has served as
Trustee of the Seattle Retail Clerks Union Pension Fund, the GEMCO Retail
Clerks Union Pension Trust Fund and is the former Vice President--Finance and
Secretary of Leslie Salt Co., a salt production company, with extensive real
estate holdings in the San Francisco Bay Area. At Leslie Salt Co., from
which he retired in 1979, Mr. Kellogg was responsible for the financial,
administrative and tax matters of the company.
Mr. William S. Royce, age 78, has been an investor in the Trust since 1964
and was elected a Trustee in 1980 and Secretary on June 15, 1988. Mr Royce
is an independent management consultant specializing in business planning and
regional economic development. He retired in 1984 from SRI International
(Stanford Research Institute). Mr. Royce also is a director of Diablo
Research Corporation and Treasurer of the Silicon Valley Economic Roundtable.
Mr. Robert C. Gould, age 52, was elected a Trustee and appointed Vice
President in June 1989 and has previously served as a Vice President and
Secretary of the Trust from 1985 through 1988. Mr. Gould is President and a
director of Menlo Management Company of which he is the sole owner. Prior to
his employment with Menlo Management, he was a real estate analyst with
Shell-Mex/B.P. Ltd., a subsidiary of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of
Companies. He is a licensed California real estate broker.
The Trust has an Audit Committee, which makes recommendations concerning the
engagement of independent public accountants, reviews the plans and results
of the audit engagement and reviews the adequacy of the Trust's internal
accounting controls, and a Compensation Committee. The members of both the
Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee are Mr. Hoefer and Mr. Royce.
39
<PAGE>
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, there were no officers
and/or Trustees whose aggregate direct remuneration exceeded $100,000. With
respect to the President of the Trust, aggregate direct remuneration,
consisting of fees for services performed as a Trustee, paid during the last
three fiscal years was as follows:
NAME AND AGGREGATE DIRECT
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR REMUNERATION
----------------------------------------------
Wilcox Patterson, 1996 $ 16,200
President
1995 $ 16,600
1994 $ 16,200
During fiscal 1996, aggregate direct remuneration paid to all Trustees and
officers as a group (five persons) was $40,100 of which $23,900 consisted of
fees for services performed as Trustees. Trustees are paid a monthly fee of
$200 for their services and a fee of $200 per Trustee meeting attended.
Committee members receive $100 per committee meeting attended.
None of the Trustees or executive officers of the Trust has failed to file,
on a timely basis, reports required to be filed pursuant to Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth as to each of the Trustees the number of Trust
Shares owned, directly or indirectly, by him on December 31, 1996. No person
is known by the Trust to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of
the Trust's outstanding Trust Shares. Each person identified in the table
has sole voting and investment power with respect to all Trust Shares shown
as beneficially owned by such person, except as otherwise set forth in the
notes to the table. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person
listed below is 1010 El Camino Real, Suite 210, Menlo Park, California 94025.
NUMBER OF SHARES PERCENT OF
NAME BENEFICIALLY OWNED CLASS(1)
---------------------------------------------------------------
John H. Hoefer 68,003 1.835%
Harry E. Kellogg (2) 7,293 .197%
Wilcox Patterson (2)(3) 27,900 .753%
William S. Royce 2,708 .073%
Robert C. Gould 1,471 .040%
(1) Based on 3,706,845 Trust Shares outstanding as of December 31, 1996, and
exercisable warrants to purchase 108,848.5 Trust Shares held by certain
shareholders as of December 31, 1996. These warrants expired December 31,
1996.
(2) Voting and investment power are shared.
(3) Includes 21,584 Trust Shares owned by members of Mr. Patterson's family as
to which Mr. Patterson disclaims any beneficial ownership interest.
40
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
For 1990 and thereafter, the Trustees have approved an incentive
compensation plan for Robert C. Gould, Trustee and Vice President of the
Trust. The annual incentive bonus under the agreement will be determined as
follows: 7.5% of the difference between "operating income" and 8.6% "adjusted
average equity." "Operating income" is defined as income from operations
before depreciation, gain on property sales, and deductions for investment
advisory fee, but after deduction for amortization of deferred costs.
"Adjusted average equity" is defined as the average of the year's beginning
and ending shareholders' equity plus accumulated depreciation. Incentive
compensation will be paid in stock, valued per share at the time the
compensation is paid at a price equal to the net proceeds per share received
by the Trust in sales of shares to the public. The Trustees intend to review
and modify if appropriate for each succeeding year, the percentage return on
adjusted average equity used in the above calculation so that it is
comparable to rates of return being earned by competing real estate entities.
For 1996, 1995 and 1994, the incentive compensation program resulted in no
bonus payment to Mr. Gould.
INVESTMENT ADVISOR, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS AND SALES SUPPORT SERVICES
AGREEMENT
Collier Investment acts as both investment advisor and real estate broker
for the Trust. Menlo Management manages the Trust's properties. Until its
dissolution in 1995, Presco provided support and capital fund raising
services and acted as a crossing agent for shareholders wishing to purchase
existing Trust shares. Collier Investment is a proprietorship of Russell
Collier. Menlo Management Company is owned by Robert C. Gould, who is a
Trustee and Vice President of the Trust. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for a description of the compensation paid to Collier
Investment and Menlo Management during the fiscal year ended December 31,
1996. Beginning on January 1, 1994, a revised investment advisory agreement
became effective, which provides for a base advisory fee to Collier
Investment of 1/5 of 1% of gross Trust assets. In July 1994, at Mr. Collier's
request this fee was reduced by 50% to 1/10 of 1% of gross Trust assets
retroactive to January 1, 1994. Mr. Collier also voluntarily waived his
right to receive any real estate brokerage commissions as a result of the
sales of Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center, which was sold on March 13, 1995,
and Menlo Center, which was sold on February 29, 1996.
LOANS FROM AFFILIATES OF MENLO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Due to the shortage or unavailability of equity financing, the Trust
obtained short-term financing at competitive rates to provide working capital
and to complete the development of its Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center
through a group of private limited partnerships. At December 31, 1996, notes
outstanding are $7,700,000, with interest rates ranging from 9.50% to 10.20%.
The notes have the capacity to be increased to a total indebtedness of
$8,050,000 and are secured by mortgage notes receivable from property sales
(see Note 3), additional deeds of trust on existing properties and the
Trust's interest in a joint venture. All of these notes at December 31, 1996
are held by private limited partnerships, independent of the Trust, in which
Menlo Management Company and/or Collier Investments has a general partnership
interest. Interest of $790,000, $1,163,000 and $1,442,000 was paid on these
notes in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The notes are due in December
1997. The Trust has the intention and ability to obtain extensions on the
maturity dates on these notes.
41
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:
(a) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. See Item 8 of
this Annual Report or Form 10-K for Consolidated Financial Statements for the
Trust, Notes thereto, and Consolidated Supplemental Schedules. A Table of
Contents to Consolidated Financial Statements and Consolidated Supplemental
Schedules is included in Item 8 and incorporated herein by reference.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. Report on Form 8-K was filed by the Trust on
March 14, 1996, October 24, 1996 and January 24, 1997.
(c) EXHIBITS:
TABLE REFERENCE EXHIBIT LOCATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------
3 and 4 Declaration of Incorporated by reference
Trust and Amendments from Form 10 and Form 8-K
of May 4, 1982
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation 5-K have been filed with
previous reports by the registrant and are incorporated by reference thereto.
42
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
Registrant
BY: WILCOX PATTERSON
-------------------------------
WILCOX PATTERSON, PRESIDENT
(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
BY: HARRY E KELLOGG
-------------------------------
HARRY E. KELLOGG, TREASURER
(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND
ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
Date: March 27, 1997
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURES DATE
---------- ----
/s/ WILCOX PATTERSON
--------------------------------------- March 27, 1997
WILCOX PATTERSON, PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
/s/ HARRY E KELLOGG
--------------------------------------- March 27, 1997
HARRY E KELLOGG, TREASURER AND TRUSTEE
/s/ ROBERT C. GOULD
--------------------------------------- March 27, 1997
ROBERT C. GOULD, TRUSTEE
/s/ WILLIAM S. ROYCE
--------------------------------------- March 27, 1997
WILLIAM S. ROYCE, TRUSTEE
/s/ JOHN H. HOEFER
--------------------------------------- March 27, 1997
JOHN H. HOEFER, TRUSTEE
43
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 2,165,000
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 6,929,000
<ALLOWANCES> 650,000
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 2,654,000
<PP&E> 42,729,000
<DEPRECIATION> (7,271,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 46,183,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,086,000
<BONDS> 33,400,000
0
0
<COMMON> 37,068,000
<OTHER-SE> (29,746,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 46,183,000<F1>
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 6,425,000
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 9,438,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 414,000<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION> 649,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 3,404,000
<INCOME-PRETAX> (3,427,000)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (3,427,000)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (3,427,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED> (.92)
<FN>
<F1>Includes $3,375,000 of Minority Interest in Joint Venture.
<F2>Represents minority interest portion of Current Net Loss.
</FN>
</TABLE>
