CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS CO
U-1/A, 1996-09-13
NATURAL GAS TRANSMISISON & DISTRIBUTION
Previous: COMPREHENSIVE CARE CORP, 10-K405/A, 1996-09-13
Next: CONSUMERS WATER CO, 11-K, 1996-09-13









                                                        File Number 70-8759


                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, DC  20549 

                            Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
                                          to
                                       Form U-1

                   APPLICATION-DECLARATION UNDER THE PUBLIC UTILITY
                             HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935

                                          By

                           CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY
                            CNG INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                                      CNG Tower
                                  625 Liberty Avenue
                         Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3199

           Consolidated Natural Gas Company, a registered holding company,
                           is the parent of the other party

                      Names and addresses of agents for service:

                        S. E. WILLIAMS, Senior Vice President
                                 and General Counsel
                           Consolidated Natural Gas Company
                                      CNG Tower
                                  625 Liberty Avenue
                         Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3199


                           N. F. CHANDLER, General Attorney
                    Consolidated Natural Gas Service Company, Inc.
                                      CNG Tower
                                  625 Liberty Avenue
                         Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3199



     <PAGE>
                                                        File Number 70-8759


                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                               Washington, D.C.  20549

                            Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
                                          to
                                       FORM U-1

                   APPLICATION-DECLARATION UNDER THE PUBLIC UTILITY
                             HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935



          Item 1.   Description of Proposed Transaction
                    -----------------------------------

          1.1  Introduction. Consolidated Natural Gas Company (the "Company" 

               ------------

     or "CNG"), a registered holding company under the Public Utility Holding

     Company Act of 1935, seeks to expand the geographic scope of certain of its

     core business activities to foreign energy markets.  These activities,

     which will be conducted through CNG's newly-formed subsidiary CNG

     International Corporation ("CNG International"), include gas transmission

     and storage, gas exploration and production, the brokering and marketing of

     electricity, gas and other energy commodities, energy consulting in foreign

     energy markets, and the provision of administrative, technical,

     construction, operating, maintenance and other management services to

     nonassociates with respect to their foreign operations (collectively,

     "Foreign Energy Activities").

          By order dated May 30, 1996, CNG was authorized to establish CNG

     International to invest in foreign utility companies ("FUCOs") and exempt

     wholesale generators ("EWGs") located outside of the United States. 

     Holding Co. Act Release No. 26523.<1>  The order further authorized the

     formation and capitalization of intermediate subsidiaries to hold interests

     in such EWGs and FUCOs, and the provision of $300 million credit support

     for these entities.  The order, however, reserved jurisdiction over the

     proposed investment of $300 million in Foreign Energy Activities, the $300 

     ---------------------

     <1>  A notice of the filing was issued on February 9, 1996.  No requests
          for hearing were received.


<PAGE>

     million credit support as it relates to these activities, and related

     transactions.

          Accordingly, CNG requests authority through March 31, 2001 to invest

     up to $300 million through CNG International in gas transmission and

     storage, gas exploration and production, and energy brokering and marketing

     activities outside of the United States.  To the extent Commission approval

     may be required, CNG further requests authority to provide guarantees and

     other credit support for these activities through March 31, 2001, up to an

     aggregate amount of $300 million at any one time outstanding, and for

     related transactions.  In this post-effective amendment, CNG seeks specific

     authority with respect to proposed investments by CNG International of up

     to $25 million in a Bolivian pipeline project, and up to $50 million in an

     Uruguayan pipeline project, including the formation and capitalization of

     such entities as may be required to hold CNG International's interests in

     the pipeline projects and related transactions, and asks the Commission to

     reserve jurisdiction over the balance of the transactions.  

          Time is of the essence.  As explained herein, the bid bond in

     connection with the Bolivian project must be submitted in the near future.
    
     Accordingly, CNG requests the Commission issue its order approving

     the proposed investments no later than October 4, 1996.

          1.2  Background. CNG, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in all 

               ----------

     phases of the natural gas business: exploration, production, purchasing,

     gathering, transmission, storage, distribution and marketing.  It is also

     involved in gas storage activities and the extraction and sale of oil,

     condensate, natural gasoline, butane, propane and ethane, and electric 

     power marketing.



<PAGE>


          For the year ending December 31, 1995, CNG had operating revenues of

     $3.307 billion.  As of December 31, 1995, CNG had consolidated assets of

     $5.418 billion.

          CNG continues to be one of the financially strongest companies in the

     industry.  The ratio of long-term debt to total capitalization is a

     conservative 35 percent.  The major rating agencies maintain high quality

     credit ratings of AA, AA-minus or A for the Company's senior debentures,

     and its commercial paper has the highest ratings.  These factors combine to

     give CNG flexibility and a solid foundation for its business strategy.

          As part of its business strategy, the Company is systematically

     seeking new ventures, both international and domestic, that will build upon

     the system's core competency as a provider of energy and energy services.

          In 1995, CNG formed a strategic alliance with EnergyAustralia,

     Australia's largest electric utility.  CNG is helping EnergyAustralia to

     develop its natural gas marketing capabilities in the restructured

     Australian energy market.  It is anticipated that the two companies

     together will identify and develop energy infrastructure projects in

     Australia and Asia.

          Earlier this year, the Commission authorized CNG to enter into a joint

     venture with two Canadian firms: Hydro-Quebec, North America's largest and

     lowest-cost generator of electricity, and Noverco, parent of Quebec's

     largest gas distributor.<2>  It is anticipated that the companies together

     will market a broad range of electric, gas and other energy supplies and

     services initially in the northeastern United States but may move into

     other market areas.



     ----------------------

     <2>  Consolidated Natural Gas Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26512 (Apr.
          ----------------------------
          30, 1996).

<PAGE>


          As the Commission has recognized, the energy industry is rapidly

     evolving.  Competition is overtaking regulation as the guiding force.<3> 

     As recent events illustrate, the industry is moving quickly toward a more

     integrated, more dynamic global energy marketplace.  The Wall Street 

                              ------

     Journal, on August 13, 1996, reported that the first-ever Mexican gas

     concession has been awarded to a consortium of U.S. and Mexican firms:

          The exclusive, 12-year concession to serve the border city of
          Mexicali, begins a privatization process that will open the entire
          country to natural-gas providers, creating a $3 billion-a-year market
          for private utilities over the next decade, according to industry
          sources.<4>

     The following day, the Journal reported that "giant energy companies,

     mainly U.S. ones, are vying to dominate access routes between Latin

     America's natural-gas fields and its big cities."  The paper reported that:

          Neighboring countries in the Southern Cone . . . have decided that
          knitting a vast gas-delivery system is the solution to the energy
          shortages that are accompanying their fast economic growth.  Within 20
          years, the network will connect gas fields in the Patagonian desert of
          Argentina and the jungles of Bolivia and Peru with the cities of
          Buenos Aires, Santiago, Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.  It will cross
          some of the world's most environmentally sensitive areas.  And it will
          cost billions of dollars, mostly from private-sector coffers.

                              *     *     *     *     *

          [The current situation] is a mess that needs to be sorted out soon. 
          Brazil has run out of feasible hydroelectricity sites, and gas is far
          less polluting than oil.  Electricity shortages are just a year or two
          away.  "We are already operating without a margin of error," says
          Carlos Roberto Silvestrin, director of Agencia Desenvolvimento Tiete
          Parana, a private-sector development group in Brazil.  "We need gas,
          and we need it quickly."

     At present, CNG is constrained by the 1935 Act from participating fully in

     these developing markets.  In contrast, non-registered U.S. companies, such



     --------------------
     <3>  See generally The Regulation of Public-Utility Holding Companies, 
          ----------------------------------------------------------------
          Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Investment Management
          (1995).

     <4>  The U.S. companies in the winning consortium, were Enova's San Diego
          Gas & Electric Co. and Pacific Enterprises' Southern California Gas
          Co.

<PAGE>

     as Enron Corp., CMS Energy Corp., and AES Corp., are already actively

     competing in Latin gas markets.

          The ability to participate in international gas markets is critical to

     CNG's long-term continued success.  Although CNG intends to strengthen and

     expand its core businesses of local gas distribution and interstate gas

     transportation, it also intends to pursue opportunities for growth in the

     unregulated parts of the energy market, including gas exploration and

     production, transportation and storage, and brokering and marketing of gas,

     electricity and other forms of energy -- the activities that are the

     subject of this filing.  By pursuing these activities in highly competitive

     foreign markets, CNG will gain expertise that will benefit its domestic

     utility consumers.

          In this regard, it is important to note that the Company's primary

     focus will continue to be on customers and opportunities domestically, even

     as it seeks to participate in carefully selected projects in key

     international markets.

          1.3  Foreign Energy Activities.  CNG has identified core 

               -------------------------

     competencies in which it can best respond to opportunities for growth in

     foreign energy markets.  Accordingly, in this post-effective amendment, CNG

     proposes that CNG International be authorized to identify, evaluate and

     engage in gas exploration and production, transmission and storage, and

     energy marketing activities in the foreign energy sector.

          Gas-Related Activities.  The world gas industry is rapidly evolving. 

          ----------------------

     Until recently, production companies (generally oil companies) have been

     multinational in scope while distribution companies have been limited to 



<PAGE> 

     domestic markets.<5>  Institutional changes, however, such as the opening

     of the gas market to new entrants, provide the conditions for a

     transformation of the gas business from a more domestically focused one

     into a more global industry.  Some companies, such as British Gas and

     Enron, have already designed and adopted strategies to become major actors

     in the global gas market.<6>

          A number of factors have contributed to the increased use of natural

     gas over the last decade.  Gas produces about half the carbon dioxide

     emissions of coal and about two thirds the emissions of fuel oil.  Thomas

     Land, writing for the Petroleum Economist Ltd. [UK] states, "The growing

     global need for environmentally clean fuel and availability of the

     plentiful natural gas reserves can be expected to combine as the major

     factor determining international trade and other economic activities in the

     medium term."<7>

          In a similar vein, Andrew Slaughter who is responsible for DRI/McGraw-

     Hill's International Energy Services comments that natural gas receives

     high marks for its environmental advantages, abundance, widespread

     geographical dispersion of its reserves, and the overall economics of gas

     use versus other fuels.<8>  Slaughter sees the strongest regional growth 


     --------------------
     <5>  Gas transportation by pipeline has been handled by consortiums of
          producing and buying companies, while liquid natural gas has been
          typically in the hands of the major oil companies.

     <6>  The investing community measures Consolidated's performance against
          the Value Line group of diversified natural gas companies (see Exhibit
          B-1), many of which are aggressively moving into international
          markets.

     <7>  Growth of Gas Could Boost World Economy; International Monetary Fund 
          --------------------------------------------------------------------
          Report on Natural Gas, Gas World International, May 1994.
          ---------------------

     <8>  Power Generation Key to Global Natural Gas, Electrical World, Nov. 
          ------------------------------------------
          1994.


<PAGE>



     rates in Latin America and the Asia/Pacific region.<9>  Energy, the economy

     and the environment will become even more closely linked as market

     globalization intensifies.<10>

          The development of energy infrastructure overseas, including

     hydrocarbon reserves, oil and gas pipelines, gas storage facilities, power

     generation, electric transmission lines, and retail distribution, also

     contributes to global energy security and price stabilization.  To the

     extent that there are additions to the supply and related infrastructure of

     different forms of energy that compete with each other, there will be less

     price volatility caused by disruption in any one energy source.

          CNG, as one of the largest integrated energy suppliers in the United

     States, has already responded to challenges in the domestic market by

     devoting additional resources to exploration and production, expanding its

     pipeline and storage capacity, and developing its energy services business.

     CNG now wishes to build upon this expertise to enable it to compete

     effectively in the global energy market.  The additional knowledge derived

     from these ventures will enable CNG to better serve consumers in the

     increasingly competitive domestic markets.

          Energy Marketing.  CNG is currently authorized to engage in the 

          ----------------

     brokering and marketing of gas through its wholly-owned subsidiary CNG 



     -------------------
     <9>  A list of natural gas-fired facilities by region is attached as
          Exhibit B-2.

     <10> Infrastructure investments result in orders for goods and services
          which frequently will be supplied by U.S. firms.  Examples in the
          energy sector would include pipe, compressors, turbines, engineering
          services, construction management, and operating management.  Filed as
          Exhibit B-3 are a number of  news releases of the Export-Import Bank
          of the United States regarding foreign energy projects that have been
          supported by Bank financing and the importance of exports to the
          domestic economy.  The Bank's support is directly related to an
          estimated 358,000 U.S. jobs and indirectly supports 2 million more.

     <11> Among other things, the CNG system is the largest gas storage operator
          in North America with a total capacity of 876 Bcf, and is arguably the
          best in the world at operating storage facilities.


<PAGE> 


     Energy Services Corporation,<12> and the marketing of electricity through

     its wholly-owned subsidiary CNG Power Services Corporation, an exempt

     wholesale generator.  CNG, through CNG Energy Arbitrage Corporation, is

     also authorized to engage in the marketing and brokering of electricity,

     gas and other fuels, the provision of electricity or fuel management

     services, and related activities and services.<13>  It is anticipated that

     CNG International will invest in brokering and marketing of electricity,

     oil, propane, natural gas liquids and other petroleum products, coal, wood

     chips and other fuels, in foreign energy markets.<14>

          1.5 Risk Profile of Foreign Energy Activities.  Investments in foreign

              -----------------------------------------

     ventures involve a variety of risks that are not necessarily present in the

     traditional, regulated public-utility industry.  CNG has addressed these

     concerns in the first instance by staffing CNG International with

     experienced professionals who have worked extensively with international

     project development and financing.<15>  By seeking project partners, using

     project financing and limiting the size of any one investment, CNG acts to

     ensure that the risks associated with foreign ventures do not adversely

     affect the financial strength of the CNG system.  In addition, CNG has

     established comprehensive procedures to identify and limit or mitigate the

     risks that may be associated with a specific project.



     --------------------
     <12> See Holding Co. Act Release No. 25600 (Aug. 7, 1992).

     <13> Consolidated Natural Gas Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26512  
          ---------------------------
     April 30, 1996).

     <14> The proposed combination of gas, electric and other energy commodity
          brokering and marketing in CNG International or a subsidiary thereof
          is similar to activities for which CNG Energy has made application in
          a pending Form U-1 proceeding at File No. 70-8883.  

     <15> Additional technical expertise will come primarily from CNG's domestic
          nonutility operations.

<PAGE> 

          The Project Review Process.  Every investment opportunity pursued by 

          --------------------------

     CNG is subjected to a series of formal reviews to ensure that the project

     satisfies the Company's standards for investment.  The process begins with

     the identification of an investment opportunity.  An analysis of the host

     country focuses on the political and economic stability of the particular

     country, the government's commitment to energy services, the legal and

     regulatory framework for private investment, and the potential effect of

     local business practices with respect to long-term investment of private

     capital.

          CNG has developed a formula and process for evaluating prospective CNG

     International investments in foreign countries.  The so-called "hurdle

     rate" study assesses the additional risks of operating in a foreign

     business environment and the uncertainty of projects in the development and

     construction stages, or with complex or new technology.

          The required rate of return or "hurdle rate" is calculated for high

     and low commercial risk projects in the foreign country.  Higher rates are

     applied to projects in the development and construction phases.  Tables are

     then prepared showing each country and the appropriate hurdle rates for

     each project stage.  The tables will be revised on a periodic basis to

     reflect changes in the country risk premiums, and to include countries

     where CNG International is actively developing projects.

          The hurdle rate table can then be used by developers to screen

     potential projects.  If the expected market rate is below the hurdle rate,

     the project can be rejected or the developer can look for income

     enhancements to boost the expected return on the project.<16>  After the

     project passes the initial screening process, a more intensive review of

     the project and the country will be undertaken.  The hurdle rate will be 

     ----------------------
     <16> In the past with EWGs and FUCOs, for example, CNG could earn
          additional income by securing the Operation & Maintenance contract, or
          by managing the fuel supply to the project.


<PAGE>


     further refined to take into account the risk profile of the project.  For

     example, the rate may be reduced if the developer is able to (i) purchase

     political risk insurance from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation,

     a U.S. Government agency, or the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency,

     a World Bank unit, or (ii) obtain sovereign guarantees from the host

     government for any of the project contracts or for foreign exchange

     availability.  The rate may also be modified upward or downward if a

     detailed review forecasts a significant change in the fundamental economic

     or political conditions of the country.<17>

          Once project development is undertaken, milestones are established and

     the project team monitors the major technical, financial, commercial and

     legal risks associated with the project and the management of those risks.

          In addition, each project is subjected to increasing levels of

     management review.  Depending on the amount of the potential exposure to

     the CNG system, a project must be approved by the Chairman and the Chief

     Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and by the full board of

     directors of CNG.

          Significantly, this internal review process is largely repeated by the

     lenders who provide debt financing for a foreign project, since repayment

     of the debt will depend, in the first instance, on the success of the

     project.  Project debt documents typically require the establishment of

     debt service and other funded reserves.

          CNG further represents that shareholders and not domestic utility

     customers will bear the risks that may be associated with these foreign

     ventures. 

     --------------------------

     <17> Attached as Exhibit B-4 is a detailed discussion of risks that are

          considered in connection with foreign ventures.



<PAGE>

          1.6  Immediate Pipeline Investment Opportunities.  Over the past year,

               -------------------------------------------

     CNG has reviewed literally dozens of potential foreign ventures.  On the

     basis of that review, CNG has identified two projects in Bolivia and

     Uruguay that meet the Company's criteria for investments.<18>  Specific

     authority is requested for those projects as discussed below.

          Bolivia Hydrocarbon Transportation

          ----------------------------------

          Bolivia is privatizing the state-owned oil and gas company Yacimientos

     Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos ("YPFB") through a public tender on

     interests in five separate units: two exploration and production units, one

     hydrocarbon transportation unit, one refining unit, and one marketing 

     unit. CNG has been prequalified by the Bolivian government to bid for the

     hydrocarbon transportation unit, which consists almost exclusively of gas

     pipelines.  It is anticipated that CNG International will participate in a

     bidding consortium.  The three members of the consortium would have equal

     economic interests in the bid. <19>

          The successful bidder will acquire a 50% economic interest and

     operational control of the existing natural gas transmission system in

     Bolivia.<20>  At present, the Bolivian system includes more the 2900 km of

     gas pipeline covering the southern and central part of the country. 

     Current transmission throughput is about 460 mmcfd including exports to

     Argentina.  Also included is a 35,000 b/d capacity oil pipeline from Santa

     Cruz, Bolivia to Arica, Chile. 

     --------------------
     <18> Attached as Exhibit C-1 is an overview of the factors that favor these
          investments.

     <19> A list of the qualified bidders for the Bolivian pipeline project is
          attached as Exhibit B-1.

     <20> The remaining 50% interest will be retained by YPFB.



<PAGE>

          In addition, the successful bidder will acquire 50% of the YPFB

     position in certain key transportation projects.  YPFB has a key ownership

     in a proposed major Bolivia to Brazil gas pipeline project, in which from

     283 to 565 mmcfd of gas is planned for export to Brazil.  YPFB's interest 

     includes 51% of the Bolivia portion of the pipeline and 12% of the

     Brazilian portion.  Additional YPFB pipeline projects are under development

     including pipelines to Chile and Paraguay.

          Bolivia's geographic position affords it the potential for serving a

     central role in the South American energy market, particularly in the

     southern cone.  Thus, participation in this capitalization is a key

     opportunity for CNG to establish a competitive position in these growing

     energy markets.

     ruguay Pipeline: Buenos Aires to Montevideo
     --------------------------------------------

          CNG International has been prequalified to submit a bid to construct,

     own, and operate a gas pipeline from Buenos Aires, Argentina to Montevideo,

     Uruguay.  It is anticipated that final bids will be submitted early this

     fall.<21>  If successful, CNG would participate in the construction and

     operation of an approximately 140 mile pipeline, including 30 miles under

     the river Plate, to provide transportation services on a non-discriminatory

     basis to substantial markets in Montevideo <22>.  It is anticipated that

     this project may eventually connect to other projects such as a planned

     pipeline to southern Brazil or a storage facility.  A successful bid on

     this project, besides providing an economic opportunity, could also provide

     a basis for developing additional energy markets in this region of South

     America.

     ----------------------
     <21> A list of the prequalified companies for the Uruguay pipeline project
     is attached as Exhibit C-3.

     <22>  The Uruguayan government may take a minority interest in the
     pipeline. 


<PAGE>


          CNG International will carry on the proposed activities through one or

     more special-purpose subsidiary or associate companies, partnerships,

     limited liability companies, joint ventures or other entities (depending

     upon the legal and regulatory requirements of the particular project) to be

     formed with unrelated persons or entities for the sole purpose of engaging

     in Foreign Energy Activities.  

          It is anticipated that financings by and among CNG International and

     its subsidiaries will be generally exempt pursuant to Rule 52 under the

     Act.  CNG requests the Commission reserve jurisdiction over any financing

     transactions that are not so exempt. <23>  

          Pursuant to the authorizations requested above and without limiting

     the same, CNG International and its subsidiaries would be able to acquire,

     without further Commission approval, voting or nonvoting stock in one or

     more corporation, general partnership interests or voting equity interests

     in one or more other joint business entities such as joint ventures or

     limited liability companies, or up to 100% of the limited partnership

     interests in one or more partnerships, provided all of such corporations,

     partnerships or other entities are established for the sole purpose of

     engaging in Foreign Energy Activities.<24>  

           CNG International will fund the proposed transactions by (i) selling

     shares of its common stock, $10,000 par value per share, to CNG, (ii) open

     account advances as described below, or (iii) long-term loans from CNG, in

     ---------------------------
     <23> CNG will file a post-effective amendment describing the general terms
     of each such security and requesting a supplemental order of the Commission
     authorizing such transactions.  CNG requests that supplemental orders be
     issued without further time-consuming public notice.

     <24> This would be similar to the authorization granted to CNG Energy in
     Commission order dated July 26, 1995, Holding Co. Act Release No. 26341,
     File No. 70-8621.


<PAGE> 

     any combination thereof.  The open account advances and long-term loans

     will have the same effective terms and interest rates as related borrowings

     of CNG in the forms listed.

           Open account advances may be made to CNG International on a revolving

     basis to provide working capital and to finance the activities authorized

     by the Commission.  Open account advances will be made under letter 

     agreement with CNG International and will be repaid on or before a date 

     not more than one year from the date of the first advance with interest 
   
     at the same effective rate of interest as CNG's weighted average 
  
     effective rate for commercial paper and/or revolving credit borrowings.  

     If no such borrowings are outstanding, the interest rate shall be 

     predicated on the Federal Funds' effective rate of interest as quoted 

     daily by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  Only outstanding amounts 

     of open account advances will be calculated against the $300 million cap 

     on financing requested herein.  

           CNG may make long-term loans to CNG International for the financing

     of its activities.  Loans to CNG International shall be evidenced by 

     long-term non-negotiable notes of CNG International (documented by book 

     entry only) maturing over a period of time (not in excess of 50 years) to

     be determined by the officers of CNG, with the interest predicated on and

     equal to CNG's cost of funds for comparable borrowings.  In the event CNG

     has not had recent comparable borrowings, the rates will be tied to the 
 
     Salomon Brothers indicative rate for comparable debt issuances published 

     in Salomon Brothers Inc. Bond Market Roundup or similar publication on the

     date nearest to the time of takedown. All loans may be prepaid at any time

     without premium or penalty.

           CNG will obtain the funds required for CNG International either

     through internal cash generation or from financings at the time authorized 



     <PAGE> 

     by the Commission, such as pursuant to the five year intrasystem financing

     authorization under Holding Co. Act Release No. 26500 (March 28, 1996).

           Authority is sought for CNG, CNG International and its subsidiaries

     engaged in Foreign Energy Activities to enter guarantee arrangements,

     obtain letters of credit, and otherwise provide credit support with respect

     to obligations of their respective subsidiaries to third parties as may be

     needed and appropriate to enable them to carry on in the ordinary course of

     their respective businesses.  The maximum aggregate limit on all credit

     support by CNG, CNG International and its subsidiaries, including the

     credit support previously authorized for EWGs and FUCOs, will be $300

     million at any one time outstanding.  The $300 million in guarantees and

     other credit support is in addition to the $300 million authority requested

     elsewhere herein.  



     Item 2.     Fees, Commissions and Expenses.

                 ------------------------------

           The fees, commissions and expenses to be paid or incurred in

     connection with the filing of this Application are estimated not to exceed

     $25,000, including the Commission's $2,000 filing fee, fees payable to 

     Consolidated Natural Gas Service Company, Inc. ("Service Company") for

     services on a cost basis (including regularly employed and fees of

     regularly employed counsel).



     Item 3.     Applicable Statutory Provisions.

                 -------------------------------

           3.1   Authorization Requested.  By order dated May 30, 1996, CNG was 

                 -----------------------

     authorized to establish CNG International to invest in FUCOs and EWGs

     located outside of the United States.  Holding Co. Act Release No.

     26523.<25>  The order further authorized the formation and capitalization

     of intermediate subsidiaries to hold interests in such EWGs and FUCOs, and

     the provision of $300 million credit support for these entities.  The 


     ---------------------
     <25>  A notice of the filing was issued on February 9, 1996.  No requests
           for hearing were received.


<PAGE> 

     order, however, reserved jurisdiction over the proposed investment of $300

     million in Foreign Energy Activities, the $300 million credit support as it

     relates to these activities, and related transactions.

           CNG now requests authority through March 31, 2001 to invest up to

     $300 million through CNG International in gas transmission and storage, gas

     exploration and production, and energy brokering and marketing activities

     outside of the United States.  To the extent Commission approval may be

     required, CNG further requests authority to provide guarantees and other

     credit support for these activities through March 31, 2001, up to an

     aggregate amount of $300 million at any one time outstanding, and for

     related transactions.  In this post-effective amendment, CNG seeks specific

     authority with respect to proposed investments by CNG International of up

     to $25 million in a Bolivian pipeline project, and up to $50 million in an

     Uruguayan pipeline project, including the formation and capitalization of

     such entities as may be required to hold CNG International's interests in

     the pipeline projects and related transactions, and asks the Commission to

     reserve jurisdiction over the balance of the transactions.   

           3.2   General Provisions.  The proposal herein is subject to sections

                 ------------------

     9(a), 10, 11, 32 and rule 54 and the Gas Related Activities Act of 1990. 

     If, however, the Commission considers the proposed transactions to require

     any authorization, approval or exemption, under any section of the Act or

     rule or regulation other than those cited hereinabove, such authorization, 

     approval or exemption is hereby requested.



     <PAGE> 



           3.3   Analysis of Section 11 Issues.

                 -----------------------------

           Under section 10(c)(1) of the Act, the SEC cannot approve an

     acquisition that would be "detrimental to the carrying out of the

     provisions of section 11."  That section, in turn, directs the SEC to limit

     the nonutility interests of a registered holding company to those that are

     "reasonably incidental, or economically necessary or appropriate" to such

     company's utility operations, including interests in any other business

     which the SEC finds "necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for

     the protection of investors or consumers and not detrimental to the proper

     functioning of such system."

           In the instant matter, these requirements are satisfied either by

     reason of the Gas Related Activities Act of 1990 ("GRAA"),<26> the plain

     meaning of section 11(b)(1) or consistent with SEC precedent under sections

     9, 10 and 11 of the Act.

     1.    MANY OF THE FOREIGN ENERGY ACTIVITIES CAN BE AUTHORIZED UNDER THE

           GRAA.

           The GRAA deems the requirements of section 11(b)(1) to be met with

     respect to certain gas-related activities.  In particular, the proposed gas

     transportation and storage activities are deemed to satisfy section

     11(b)(1) pursuant to section 2(a) of the GRAA.  The remaining activities,

     relating to gas exploration, development, production, marketing,

     manufacture and other similar activities related to the supply of natural

     or manufactured gas ("gas supply activities"), can be found to satisfy the

     standards of section 11 pursuant to section 2(b) of the GRAA.  That

     section, in turn, requires a Commission finding that the proposed activity:

           is in the interest of consumers of each gas utility company of such
           registered company or consumers of any other subsidiary of such
           registered company; and . . . 

     ---------------------
     <26>  Pub. L. No. 101-572, 104 Stat. 2810 (codified at 15 U.S.C. sec. 79k
           note).


<PAGE> 


           such acquisition will not be detrimental to the interest of consumers
           of any such gas utility company or other subsidiary as to the proper
           functioning of the registered holding company system.

     Section 2(c) of the GRAA provides that each determination be made "on a

     case-by-case basis, and not based on any preset criteria."

           The proposed gas supply activities clearly satisfy the standards for

     approval under section 2(b) of the GRAA.  These activities are in the

     interest of system consumers.  The activities of CNG International will

     benefit domestic utility consumers both directly, by enabling CNG to

     develop greater expertise in operating in competitive markets, and

     indirectly, by generating economic profits that will contribute to the

     financial strength of the CNG system and so result in continued low rates

     for CNG's consumers.  Such profits would be due, in part, to the higher

     rate of return associated with investments in foreign energy markets.

            As used in the GRAA, the term "consumers" also refers to customers

     of other system companies, such as pipelines and other nonutility

     subsidiaries.<27>  To succeed in a competitive marketplace, CNG

     International must provide benefits for these consumers as well.  The

     interchange of technical and other expertise, between the domestic and

     foreign portions of the CNG system will also contribute to the strength of

     the system as a whole.  Energy markets in other parts of the world are more

     developed than those in the Unites States.  The ability to move

     technological and market intelligence to and from CNG's domestic markets

     will make the Company more competitive, and so benefit consumers of both 

     utility and nonutility companies in the CNG system.  In addition, the

     proposed activities will contribute to the optimal use of system resources,

     allowing such resources to be deployed over larger market areas, and

     permitting full utilization of system personnel.

     ------------------------
     <27>  National Fuel Gas Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26181 (Dec. 6, 
          ---------------------
     1994).


<PAGE>


           Further, as the sponsors of the GRAA recognized:

           Technical advances and expertise may also be developed through these
           activities that may benefit consumers.  Finally, there may exist
           assets that either surplus to the needs of the system or that have
           developed in the normal course of system operations.  Use of these
           assets to maximize their value is recognized as a benefit to
           customers only so long as the proposed activity does not create a
           detriment to system customers. <28>

     In this matter, investors and not consumers will bear the risks that may be

     associated with these new ventures.  As explained previously, CNG conducts

     a thorough review of any proposed investment, with a view toward risk

     management.  The international operations will be conducted with the same

     prudence and sound business judgment that has resulted in CNG's present

     status as one of the country's most financially sound energy providers.

 	   There is no geographic limit under the GRAA.  In this matter, the

    public interest standard is readily satisfied.  

    For the reasons explained previously, the proposed activities will not 

    lead to a recurrence of the abuses the Act was intended to correct.<29>


     2.    THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES SATISFY THE PLAIN MEANING OF SECTION
           11(b)(1).

           The proposed activities can be approved under sections 9, 10 and 11

     of the Act.  In the first instance, gas transmission and storage,

     exploration and development, and the marketing and brokering of energy

     commodities all satisfy the plain meaning of section 11: they are both

     "reasonably incidental, or economically necessary or appropriate" to CNG's

     utility operations and "not detrimental" to the protected interests or to 


     -----------------------
     <28>  S17585 Cong. Rec. (Oct. 27, 1990).

     <29>  See Gaz Metropolitain, Inc., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26170 (Nov. 
           --- -----------------------
           23, 1994) (permitting a foreign holding company to acquire U.S.
           utility operations), and Southern Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 
                                       ------------
           25639 (Sept. 23, 1992) (permitting acquisition of foreign utility
           operations by a registered holding company).

<PAGE>


     the proper functioning of the CNG system.  There is precedent for this

     approach.  At the end of 1994, the SEC approved a proposal by The Southern

     Company to develop a wireless communications system to provide services to

     system companies and regional nonassociates.  In addition to approving the

     transaction under the functional relationship test, the SEC noted that the

     activities were permissible under the plain meaning of section 11, as

     "reasonably incidental, or economically necessary or appropriate" to the

     system's core utility operations, and "necessary or appropriate in the

     public interest or for the protection of investors or consumers and not

     detrimental" to the proper functioning of the integrated system.<30>

           Thereafter, in its report on the regulation of public-utility holding

     companies, the Division of Investment Management recommended that the SEC

     adopt a more flexible approach to diversification.  The report stated that:

           Specifically, the Division contemplates an interpretation of the
           language of section 11(b)(1) that would allow registered holding
           companies to engage in nonutility businesses that are economically
           appropriate and in the public interest, regardless of whether such 
                                                     --------------------------
           activities are ancillary to the utility business (emphasis added).
           ------------------------------------------------

     The report cited the Southern mobile communications order discussed above,

                             --------

     and the 1946 Study of Operations.<31>  The Division's recommendation is

     noteworthy because, as the staff is aware, the report was the result of a

     year-long process of consensus-building at all levels of the SEC, in

     consultation with congressional staff and the NARUC, as well as the

     companies and other interested parties.



     -----------------------
     <30>  Southern Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26211 (Dec. 30, 1994).
           ------------

     <31>  Study of Operations Pursuant to Public Utility Holding Company Act of
           ---------------------------------------------------------------------
           1935:  Hearings before the Securities Subcommittee of the House of 
           ------------------------------------------------------------------
           Representatives Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 79th 
           ------------------------------------------------------------
           Cong., 2d Sess., pt. 3 at 851 (1946).


<PAGE> 

     3.   THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES ARE CONSISTENT WITH COMMISSION PRECEDENT UNDER
          SECTIONS 9, 10 AND 11 OF THE ACT.

          In the alternative, the activities are consistent with Commission

     precedent.  Clearly, gas transmission and storage, gas exploration and

     production, and the marketing and brokering of energy commodities are all

     closely related to the CNG system's core utility business.  The fact that

     these activities will be conducted outside of the United States does not

     destroy that relationship.

          Although the SEC has traditionally required an operating or

     "functional relationship" between the nonutility business and the system's

     utility operations, the interpretation of this test has evolved in recent

     years, in response to changes in the utility industry.  In 1995, in an

     order removing the percentage limitation on the EUA system's energy

     management services business, the SEC found the standards of section 11

     satisfied because the subject activities were "closely related to the core

     business of the utility."<32>  The SEC explained that:

          The Act "creates a system of pervasive and continuing economic
          regulation that must in some measure at least be refashioned from
          time to time to keep pace with changing economic and regulatory
          climates."  The Commission is satisfied that, "On the facts of
          this matter we do not believe that the proposed acquisition will
          lead to a recurrence of the evils the Act was intended to
          address."<33>

     Since the report was issued, the SEC has taken several major steps toward 

     implementing its recommendations.  Proposed rule 58 would exempt from the

     requirement of prior SEC approval under sections 9(a)(1) and 10 of the Act,

     pursuant to section 9(c)(3), the acquisition by a registered holding

     ---------------------

     <32> Eastern Utilities Associates, Holding Co. Act Release No. 26232 (Feb.
          ----------------------------
          15, 1995) (footnote omitted).

     <33> Id., quoting Union Electric Co., 45 S.E.C. 489, 503 n. 52 (1974), 
          ---           -----------------
          aff'd sub nom. City of Cape Girardeau v. SEC, 521 F.2d 324 (D.C. Cir.
          ----- --- ---- -----------------------------
          1975), and Southern Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 25639 (Sept. 23,
                      ------------
          1992) (approving acquisition of foreign public-utility subsidiary
          companies).


<PAGE> 


     company of the securities of an energy-related company, subject to certain

     investment limitations and reporting requirements, and the acquisition by a

     registered gas-utility holding company of the securities of a gas-related

     company, subject to certain reporting requirements.<34>

          Most recently, in the CNG Energy Alliance order, the SEC authorized

     the system to engage, without geographic restriction, in marketing and

     brokering activities as a full participant in the integrated energy

     markets.  Under the order, CNG can deal in various types of energy

     commodities rather than limiting itself to gas, the energy sold by system

     utilities.<34>  The SEC noted that it is appropriate to assess issues in

     light of the "changing realities" of the utility industry."



     (i)  THE FOREIGN ENERGY ACTIVITIES ARE CLOSELY RELATED TO CNG'S CORE

          UTILITY BUSINESS.

          The Foreign Energy Activities are "energy-related" or "gas-related"

     within the meaning of proposed rule 58.  The proposed brokering and

     marketing of electricity and other energy commodities would also be energy-

     related activities under section b(1)(v) of the rule.  The proposing

     release cites various orders in which registered holding companies have

     been authorized to engage in energy marketing and brokering activities:

     Consolidated Natural Gas Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 24329 (Feb. 27, 

     --------------------
     <34> Exemption of Acquisition by Registered Public-Utility Holding
          Companies of Securities of Nonutility Companies Engaged in Certain
         Energy-Related and Gas-Related Businesses; Exemptions of Capital
          Contributions and Advances to Such Companies, Holding Co. Act Release
          No. 26313 (June 20, 1995).

     <35> Consolidated Natural Gas Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26512 (Apr.
          ---------------------------
          30, 1996).  The description of the CNG Energy Arbitrage order is taken
          from Eastern Utilities Associates, Holding Co. Act Release No.      
          ----------------------------
          26519 (May 23, 1996), in which the SEC authorized retail marketing of
          electric power with respect to pilot programs adopted in New Hampshire
          and Massachusetts.


<PAGE> 


     1987); Entergy Corp., Holding Co. Act Release No. 25848 (July 8, 1993); and

           ------------

     UNITIL Corp., Holding Co. Act Release No. 25816 (May 24, 1993).  In 

     ------------

     addition, as noted above, the SEC has recently authorized CNG in a wide

     range of energy marketing and brokering activities.<36>

          The activities related to gas exploration and production, transmission

     and storage, and brokering and marketing of natural gas are all "gas-

     related" activities within the meaning of the rule.  The definition of gas-

     related company under rule 58 is derived, in turn, from the Gas Related

     Activities Act of 1990 in which Congress intended, by permitting gas

     registered holding companies to invest in gas production, transportation,

     storage, marketing and similar activities, to promote competition in the

     natural gas markets.  As the SEC noted in the proposing release for rule

     58, "the activities contemplated by the GRAA are per se closely related 
                                                      --- --

     to the core utility business of the gas registered holding companies."  


     (ii) THE SEC HAS PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED REGISTERED HOLDING COMPANIES TO

          ENGAGE IN FOREIGN NONUTILITY ACTIVITIES.

          It is our understanding that the SEC staff distinguishes the instant

     matter from the precedent largely on the basis of the foreign nature of the

     proposed activities.  The basis for this distinction, however, is unclear. 

     The matter is not unprecedented.  Rather, there is ample precedent in

     orders issued by the SEC over the past 25 years, permitting registered

     holding companies to engage in a wide range of nonutility activities

     worldwide.

          Beginning in 1981, the SEC permitted The Southern Company to provide

     management, technical and training services to nonassociates including

     "unaffiliated domestic or foreign governmental agencies, public utilities, 

     -------------------
     <36> Indeed, a survey of the FERC Docket filings indicates that more than
          half of the power marketing applicants have gas, as well as electric
          marketing capability.


<PAGE> 

     industrial concerns, or entities owning, operating or performing services

     for any of them."  Southern Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 22132 (July 

                        ------------

     17, 1981).  A year later, the SEC authorized American Electric Power

     Company to sell "management, technical, and training expertise in the open,

     competitive market to non-affiliated entities including domestic and

     foreign governmental agencies, public utilities and other business

     concerns."  American Electric Power Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 22468

                 ---------------------------

     (Apr. 21, 1982).  See also New England Electric System, Holding Co. Act 
                       --- ---- ---------------------------

     Release No. 22719 (Nov. 19, 1982), and Middle South Utilities, Holding Co.

                                            ----------------------

     Act Release No. 22828 (Jan. 11, 1983).

          In 1992, the SEC issued a series of orders permitting public-utility

     holding companies, both registered and exempt, to acquire interests in

     foreign utility operations.  In authorizing Southern Electric

     International, Inc., a subsidiary of The Southern Company to acquire an

     ownership interest in an Australian power station, the SEC stated:

          Since the Act was adopted in 1935, the world economy has changed
          vastly.  Products and services are increasingly traded on a global
          market.  Financial and securities markets are becoming more
          international.  There is every reason to believe that this development
          will continue, and even accelerate.

          Against this backdrop, we note the increasing opportunities for
          international utility investments and demand for American utility
          expertise abroad. . . .  We agree with the commmenter, CNG, that
          "there is nothing in the 1930 era abuses cited in Section 1(b) which
          is apropos to the concentrated and project directed financings in the
          foreign utility investment transactions in the 1990s."

     Southern Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 25639 (Sept. 23, 1992) (citation

     ------------

     omitted).  The Energy Policy Act of 1992 subsequently amended the Act to

     create new sections 32 and 33 which expressly permit registered holding

     companies to invest in foreign utility operations.  In a floor statement,

     Senator Riegle explained that it was Congress' intention that registered

     holding companies be able to respond to "immediate and fleeting 

<PAGE> 

     opportunities for U.S. companies."<37>

          Although the same logic would apply in the instant matter, the

     exemption under section 33, which tracks the statutory definitions of gas

     and electric utility companies, does not by its terms extend to investments

     in foreign gas exploration, production, transportation and storage as such.

     The omission of these activities may be viewed as an unintended consequence

     of the decision in 1935 to narrow the definition of gas utility company to

     lessen the regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry.<38>  If, as

     originally proposed, the definition of gas utility had extended to

     production and transportation, as well as to distribution, it is likely

     that these activities would have been similarly exempted by the Energy

     Policy Act of 1992.  As it remains, and as recognized by the GRAA, these

     activities are integral to the operation of a gas utility system.  Their

     characterization as "nonutility" activities is a legal fiction that follows

     from the decision of the Congress in 1935 not to attempt to regulate the

     entire oil and gas industry.

          The Energy Policy Act also implicitly authorized registered holding

     companies to engage in foreign nonutility activities.  The Federal Energy

     Regulatory Commission has interpreted section 32 of the Act, which requires

     that an exempt wholesale generator be engaged "exclusively" in owning or 

     ---------------------
     <37> Statement of Sen. Riegle, Cong. Rec. S17629 (Oct. 8, 1992).

     <38> The Senate Report explains:

          "Gas utility company" had been defined in the original title to
          include every person in the business of producing, transporting, or
          selling natural or manufactured gas.  The committee did not find it
          desirable to include so broad a group of persons and has limited the
          definition for the purposes of [the 1935 Act] so as to reach only
          companies in the business of distribution at retail, thus excluding
          companies, whose only interest in the gas business is in the sources
          of supply or in transportation.

     S. Rep. No. 621, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 5 (1935) ("Senate Report").


<PAGE>


     operating eligible facilities, to permit certain incidental nonutility

     activities.  Section 33, which does not contain an "exclusively"

     requirement, on its face would seem to permit foreign nonutility activities

     by an entity that has notified the SEC of its status as a foreign utility

     company.

          In addition, since 1992, the SEC has issued a series of orders

     enlarging the scope of permissible nonutility activities.  In 1994, the SEC

     authorized Central and South West Corporation to provide a wide range of

     services, including design, construction, engineering, operation,

     maintenance, management, administrative, employment, tax, accounting,

     economic, financial, fuel environmental, communications, energy

     conservation, demand side management, overhead efficiency, utility

     performance and electronic data processing, as well as software development

     and support, services to "foreign electric utility enterprises."  Central 

                                                                      -------

     and South West Corp., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26156 (Nov. 3, 1994).  A

     --------------------

     year later, in the EUA Cogenex order discussed above, the SEC removed 

                       -----------

     previous restrictions on sales of goods and services to nonassociates,

     implicitly authorizing that company to render energy management services

     worldwide.  Eastern Utilities Associates, Holding Co. Act Release No. 26232

                 ----------------------------

     (Feb. 15, 1995).<39>  Similarly, the SEC removed the 50% limitation on the

     activities of HEC Canada and HEC International, permitting those companies

     to provide energy management, demand side management and consulting service

     worldwide.  Northeast Utilities, Holding Co. Act Release No. 26335 (July 
                 -------------------

     19, 1995).  See also Central and South West Corporation, Holding Co. Act 
                 --- ---- ----------------------------------

     Release No. 26367 (Sept. 1, 1995), and Allegheny Power System, Holding Co.

                                           ----------------------

     Act Release No. 26401 (Oct. 27, 1995).  Concurrently, in its release 


     -------------------
     <39> The SEC had previously authorized the formation of a subsidiary EUA
          Cogenex Canada for the sale of energy management and demand-side
          management services to Canadian institutional customers.  EUA 
                                                                    --- 
          Cogenex, Holding Co. Act Release No. 26135 (Sept. 30, 1994).
          -------

<PAGE> 

     proposing rule 58, the SEC stated that "it is unnecessary to restrict the

     extent to which an energy-related company or a gas-related company may

     serve nonassociate companies."



     (iii)     THE FOREIGN ENERGY ACTIVITIES WILL BENEFIT CNG'S CONSUMERS.

          The activities of CNG International will benefit domestic utility

     consumers both directly, by enabling CNG to develop greater expertise in

     operating in competitive markets, and indirectly, by generating economic

     profits that will contribute to the financial strength of the CNG system

     and so result in continued low rates for CNG's consumers.  Such profits

     would be due, in part, to the higher rate of return associated with

     investments in foreign energy markets.

          To succeed in a competitive marketplace, CNG International must

     provide benefits for these consumers as well.  The interchange of technical

     and other expertise, between the domestic and foreign portions of the CNG

     system will also contribute to the strength of the system as a whole.  Many

     energy markets in other parts of the world are more developed than those in

     the United States.  The ability to move technological and market 

     intelligence to and from CNG's domestic markets will make the Company more

     competitive, and so benefit consumers of both utility and nonutility

     companies in the CNG system.  In addition, the proposed activities will

     contribute to the optimal use of system resources, allowing such resources

     to be deployed over larger market areas, and permitting full utilization of

     system personnel.  As the sponsors of the GRAA recognized, technical

     advances and expertise may also be developed through these activities that

     may benefit consumers.<40>

     -------------------
     <40> S17585 Cong. Rec. (Oct. 27, 1990).


<PAGE>

     (iv) CONCLUSION

          Clearly much has changed since 1981 when CNG sold its Canadian

     operations because they were unable to use the properties as a direct

     source of supply for the CNG domestic utility system.  See Consolidated   
                                                            --- ------------

     Natural Gas Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 22016 (Apr. 21, 1981, as     
     ---------------

     amended Apr. 23, 1981).  With developments in infrastructure and

     technology, the gas from those operations is now serving utility customers

     in California.

          The gas industry, which has already undergone the first round of

     restructuring, now faces a second wave of challenges as companies seek to

     compete in a global energy market.  Other companies, that are not subject

     to the 1935 Act, have already penetrated these markets.  As noted

     previously, Enron Corporation, for example, has proclaimed its intention to

     be the first gas "major," with the capability of providing energy for all

     classes of customers world-wide.  At present, Enron and its subsidiaries

     are engaged in the gathering, transportation and marketing of natural gas

     throughout the United States and internationally through approximately

     44,000 miles of pipelines.  The company is also involved in the exploration

     for and production of natural gas and crude oil in the United States and

     internationally, the production, purchase, transportation and world-wide

     marketing of natural gas liquids and refined petroleum products, the 

     independent development, construction and operation of gas-fired power

     plants in the United States and internationally, and a wide range of energy

     marketing and brokering activities.

          Exempt holding companies, as well, have acquired significant interests

     in foreign gas-related ventures.  In 1995, CMS Energy Corporation, an

     exempt gas and electric utility holding company, through its pipeline

     subsidiary, acquired a 25% interest in Argentina's Trasportadora Gas del

     Norte pipeline for approximately $140 million.  In addition, the company 



<PAGE> 



     has announced that its oil and gas exploration and production subsidiary

     has entered into an agreement to acquire Pecten Yemen Company, an affiliate

     of Shell Oil Company, that holds a working interest in the East Shabwa

     Contract Area.  These efforts are in addition to the company's significant

     domestic activities, including power marketing and brokering.

          The proposed Foreign Energy Activities are a necessary complement to

     the foreign utility activities authorized under the Energy Policy Act of

     1992.  Strategic benefits are anticipated to stem from the company's

     participation in new energy markets.  While investments in foreign projects

     may pose risks that do not arise in the domestic electric utility industry,

     these risks are not an absolute bar to foreign investment.  Rather, as the

     SEC emphasized in its recent order permitting Southern to invest an amount

     equal to 100% of its consolidated retained earnings in exempt wholesale

     generators and foreign utility companies, there is a need for the

     registered holding company to establish procedures to identify and mitigate

     such risks.<41>

          In this matter, as discussed previously, there are ample safeguards

     for consumer interests.  The transactions will be structured so that

     investors and not consumers will bear the risks that may be associated with

     these new ventures.  As explained previously, CNG conducts a thorough 

     review of any proposed investment, with a view toward risk management.  The

     international operations will be conducted with the same prudence and sound

     business judgment that has resulted in CNG's present status as one of the

     country's most financially sound energy provider.

          Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, CNG requests that the

     SEC should release jurisdiction over the gas transmission and storage, gas 

     ------------------
     <40> Southern Co., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26501 (Apr. 1, 1996).
          ------------


<PAGE>


     exploration and production and the marketing and brokering of energy

     commodities.



     Item 4.   Regulatory Approval
               -------------------
              
          The authorization sought herein is not subject to the jurisdiction of

     any State or Federal Commission (other than the Commission).



     Item 5.   Procedure
               ---------

          It is hereby requested that the Commission issue its order with

     respect to the proposed pipeline transactions on or before October 4, 
   
     1996.  It is further requested that the Commission delegate authority to

     the Division to release jurisdiction over the remaining transactions, from

     time to time, as the record is completed with respect to those matters.

          It is submitted that a recommended decision by a hearing or other

     responsible officer of the Commission is not needed with respect to the

     proposed transactions.  The Division of Investment Management - Office of

     Public Utility Regulation may assist in the preparation of the Commission's

     decision.  There should be no waiting period between the issuance of the

     Commission's order and the date on which it is to become 

     effective.

          It is also requested that rule 24 Certificates of Notification be

     filed within 45 days after the end of each quarterly calendar period to

     report to the Commission with respect to transactions authorized pursuant

     to this filing.  Such certificates shall contain a CNG International

     balance sheet as of the end of such period, and a statement of income and

     expense for the period.

          The certificates will also contain a summary of services provided by

     associate CNG System companies to CNG International or its subsidiaries. 

     This summary will detail the service provided, identify the company

     providing the same, the total full-time equivalent employees involved in

     such service activities during the reporting period, the charge for such

     service and the method of calculating such charge (cost or market).


     Item 6.   Exhibits and Financial Statements
               ---------------------------------

          The following exhibits and financial statements are made a part of

     this statement:

           (a)  Exhibits

           A-1   Certificate of Incorporation of CNG International.

           A-2   By-laws of CNG International.*

           B-1   List of Diversified Natural Gas Companies Moving into 
                 International Markets.

           B-2   List of Natural Gas Fired Facilities by Region (1990-2015).
          
           B-3   News Releases of Export Import Bank Concerning Foreign Energy
                 Projects.

           B-4   Analysis of Foreign Investment Risks

            F    Opinion of counsel for CNG and CNG International.

- -------------
*  Filed Previously


     Item 7.  Information as to Environmental Effects
              _______________________________________

           The proposed transactions do not involve major federal action having

     a significant effect on the human environment.  See Item 1(a).

           No federal agency has prepared or is preparing an environmental

     impact statement with respect to the proposed transaction.



<PAGE> 

                                      SIGNATURE



          Pursuant to the requirements of the Public Utility Holding Company Act

     of 1935, the undersigned company has duly caused this statement to be

     signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                        CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY


                                   By   /s/ D. M. Westfall
                                        -----------------------------
                                        D. M. Westfall
                                        Senior Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer


                                        CNG INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                                   By    /s/ N. F. Chandler
                                         ----------------------------
                                         N. F. Chandler
                                         Its attorney


     Date: September 13, 1996


<PAGE>

          EXHIBIT INDEX
          --------------

          A-1  Certificate of Incorporation of CNG International.

         B-1  List of Diversified Natural Gas Companies Moving into 
               International Markets.

          B-2  List of Natural Gas Fired Facilities by Region (1990-2015).
          
          B-3  News Releases of Export Import Bank Concerning Foreign Energy
               Projects.

          B-4  Analysis of Foreign Investment Risks

           F    Opinion of counsel for CNG and CNG International.





                                                                         
                                              EXHIBIT A-1


                             CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                          OF

                            CNG INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                  The undersigned, a natural person, for the purpose of
             organizing a corporation for conducting the business and
             promoting the purposes hereinafter stated, under the
             provisions and subject to the requirements of the laws of
             the State of Delaware (particularly Chapter 1, Title 8 of
             the Delaware Code and the acts amendatory thereof and
             supplemental thereto, and known, identified, and referred to
             as the "General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware"),
             hereby certifies that:

                  FIRST.  The name of the corporation (hereinafter called
             the "corporation") is:

                       CNG INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                  SECOND.  The address, including street, number, city,
             and county, of the registered office of the corporation in
             the State of Delaware is 1013 Centre Road, Wilmington,
             County of New Castle; and the name of the registered agent
             of the corporation in the State of Delaware at such address
             is The Prentice-Hall Corporation System, Inc.

                  THIRD.  The purpose of the corporation is to engage in
             any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be
             organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

                  FOURTH.  The total number of shares of stock which the
             corporation shall have authority to issue is Thirty Thousand
             (30,000) shares.  Each of such shares have a par value of
             Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00).  All such shares are one
             class and are shares of Common Stock.

                  FIFTH.  The name and mailing address of the
             incorporator are as follows:

             NAME                          MAIL ADDRESSING

             Evelyn F. Wright              1013 Centre Road
                                           Wilmington, DE  19805

                  SIXTH.  The name and the mailing address of each person
             who is to serve as a director until the first annual meeting
             of stockholders or until a successor is elected and
             qualified is as follows:

                  S. E. Williams      CNG Tower
                                      625 Liberty Avenue
                                      Pittsburgh, PA  15222

                                      CNG Tower
                  D. M. Westfall      625 Liberty Avenue
                                      Pittsburgh, PA  15222

                                      625 Liberty Avenue

                  R. M. Sable, Jr.    Pittsburgh, PA  15222

                  SEVENTH.  The corporation is to have perpetual
             existence.

                  EIGHTH.  In furtherance, and not in limitation of the
             powers conferred by statue, the board of directors if
             expressly authorized:

                  To make, alter or repeal the by-laws of the
             corporation.

                  By a majority of the whole board, to designate one or
             more committees, each committee to consist of one or more of
             the directors of the corporation.  The board may designate
             one or more directors as alternate members of any committee,
             who may replace any designate one or more directors as
             alternate members of any committee, who may replace any
             absent or disqualified member at any meeting of the
             committee.  The by-laws may provide that in the absence or
             disqualification of a member of a committee, the member or
             members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified
             from voting, whether or not he or they constitute a quorum,
             may unanimously appoint another member of the board of
             directors to act at the meeting in the place of any such
             absent or disqualified member.  Any such committee, to the
             extent provided in the resolution of the board of directors
             or in the by-laws of the corporation, shall have and may
             exercise all the business and affairs of the corporation,
             and may authorize the seal of the corporation to be affixed
             to all papers which may require it; but no such committee
             shall have the power or authority in reference to amending
             the certificate of incorporation, adopting an agreement of
             merger or consolidation, recommending to the stockholders
             the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of
             the corporation's property and assets, recommending to the
             stockholders a dissolution of the corporation of a
             revocation of a dissolution, or amending the by-laws of the
             corporation; and unless the resolution or by-laws expressly
             so provide, no such committee shall have the power or
             authority to declare a dividend or to authorize the issuance
             of stock.

                  When and as authorized by the stockholders in
             accordance with statute, to sell, lease or exchange all or
             substantially all of the property and assets of the
             corporation, including its good will and its corporate
             franchises, upon such terms and conditions and for such
             consideration, which may consist in whole or in part of
             money or property including shares of stock in, and/or other
             securities of, any other corporation or corporation, as its
             board of directors shall deem expedient and for the best
             interests of the corporation.

                  NINTH.  Elections of directors need not be by written
             ballot unless the by-law of the corporation shall so

                  Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without
             the State of Delaware, as the by-laws may provide.  The
             books of the corporation may be kept (subject to any
             provision contained in the statutes) outside the State of
             Delaware at such place or places as may be designated from
             time to time by the board of directors or in the by-laws of
             the corporation.

                  TENTH.  To the full extent that the General Corporation
             Law of the State of Delaware, as the same now exists,
             permits elimination or limitation of the liability of
             directors, no director of the corporation shall be liable to
             the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for
             breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability
             (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the
             corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions
             not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or
             a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the
             Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any
             transaction from which the director derived an improper
             personal benefit.

                  To the full extent permitted by law, all directors of
             the corporation shall be afforded any exemption from
             liability or limitation of liability permitted by any
             subsequent enactment, modification or amendment of the
             General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

                  Any repeal or modification of either or both of the
             foregoing paragraphs by the stockholders of the corporation
             shall no adversely affect any exemption from liability
             limitation of liability or other right of a director of the
             corporation with respect to any matter occurring prior to
             such repeal or modification.

                  ELEVENTH.  The corporation reserves the right to amend,
             alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this
             certificate of incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter
             prescribed by statue, and all rights conferred upon
             stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.

             Signed on January 19, 1996


                                           /s/ Evelyn F. Wright
                                           ------------------------
                                           Evelyn F. Wright
                                           Incorporator








                                                                EXHIBIT B-1


                            LIST OF PREQUALIFIED COMPANIES
                           -------------------------------
                               FOR THE URAGUAY PIPELINE
                              -------------------------

          1.   THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. - Estados Unidos.

          2.   ENAGAS S.A. - Espana.

          3.   ENRON TRANSPORTADORA URUGUAY LTD. - Estados Unidos.

          4.   NOVAGAS INTERNATIONAL Ltd. - Canada.

          5.   NOVAGAS INTERNATIONAL S.A. - Argentina.

          6.   ICA (INGENTIEROS CIVILES ASOCIADOS S.A.) - Mexico - PAMAR
               SACIFIA - Argentina

          7.   TRANSPORTADORA DE GAS DEL SUR S.A. - Argentina.

          8.   INTERNATIONAL GENERATING COMPANY, Ltd. - Estados Unidos.

          9.   GDF INTERNATIONAL (Francia)-GASEBA S.A. (Argentina)-BRIDAS
               SAPIC (Argentina)-EMPRIGAS S.A. (Argentina).

          10.  SHELL INTERNATIONAL GAS LIMITED - Holanda.

          11.  CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY - Estados Unidos.

          12.  BRITISH GAS (Reino Unico)-ASTRA COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE
               PETROLEO S.A. - ORPYDSA (Uruguay)

          13.  TECHINT COMPANIA TECNICA INTERNACIONAL SACI (Argentina)-
               NOVAGAS INTERNACIONAL S.A.

          14.  COMPANIA GENERAL DE COMBUSTIBLES S.A. (Argentina)



     <PAGE> 

                     QUALIFIED BIDDERS FOR THE BOLIVIAN PIPELINE
                     -------------------------------------------

          1.   Bridas S.A.P.I.C.
          2.   CNG
          3.   CMS Enterprises
          4.   Compania General de Combustibles
          5.   El Paso Energy Development Company
          6.   Enron Transportadora (Bolivia) S.A.
          7.   Exxon Pipeline Bolivia Limited
          8.   GASEBA - Gax de France
          9.   International Generating Company Ltd.
          10.  International Generating Pipeline Company, Ltd.
          11.  IPL International, Inc.
          12.  Mobil Corporation
          13.  Nova Corporation
          14.  Nova Gas International S.A.
          15.  Panhandle International Development Corporation
          16.  Sonat Americas, Inc.
          17.  Tejas Gas International Ltd.
          18.  Transcanada Pipelines
          19.  Westcoast Energy, Inc.
          20.  Williams International Pipeline Company







                                                          EXHIBIT B-2


                    DIVERSIFIED NATURAL GAS COMPANIES 

                    MOVING INTO INTERNATIONAL MARKETS


          Coastal Corporation
          -------------------

               Central America - cogeneration plant
               China - cogeneration plant

          El Paso
          -------

               Mexico - 30% interest in 700 MW power plant
               Peru - 25% interest in pipeline, transmission line and 
                  gas-fired power plant

               (through acquisition of Tennecos energy assets):

               Southeastern Australia - 470 mile gas pipeline  
               South Australia - 488 mile gas pipeline 
               Brazil/Bolivia - 8-10% interest in a pipeline with
                  possible participation in related power plants
               China - technical advisor for construction of major
                  onshore gas pipeline
               Taiwan - alliance to develop a 600MW gas-fired power
                  plant and a 190 mile offshore pipeline
               Australia - an interest in a 135 MW power plant and a
                  50% interest in a gas field

          Enron
          -----

               Engaged in the following activities in India, Turkey, 
          Indonesia, Italy, China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Guatemala and
          the Dominican Republic: 

               More than 1,000MW in power projects under construction
               About 3,000MW in the final development stage
               About 2,300 MW in active development
               Almost 6,000 MW in preliminary development

               Engaged in gas pipeline and other gas activities  activities
          in Argentina, Columbia, Bolivia, Brazil, Russia, Trinidad and
          India

               Has energy trading operations in London, Buenos Aires,
               Caracas, Dubai, UAE, Kingston, Paris and Singapore

          Ensearch
          --------

               Victoria, Australia - Electric distribution company
                  (through Texas Utilities)

          Pacific Enterprises
          -------------------

               Argentina - 12.5% interest in each of two gas utilities
               Mexico - a gas distribution company

          PanEnergy
          ---------

               Peru - interest in a joint venture to develop oil and 
                  gas, and construct a gas-fired power plant and
                  transmission lines

          KN Energy
          ---------

               Soon to announce a joint venture with an international
               partner

          Noram Energy
          ------------

               A number of overseas projects are on the horizon








                                                          EXHIBIT B-3


          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          http://www.exim.gov:80/press/apr0596.html

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          April 5, 1996 
          Contact:  Marianna Ohe 202-565-3200

          Louisiana and Texas Oil & Gas Companies To Benefit

          EX-IM BANK SUPPORTS U.S. EXPORTS TO GHANA POWER PROJECT

          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) has
          approved financing to support $326 million in sales of U.S. oil
          and gas production equipment and services to an off-shore gas
          field development project in Ghana.  The transaction represents a
          major Ex-Im Bank commitment to supporting exports to the West
          African market.

          Ex-Im Bank has authorized a $253 million long-term guarantee to
          finance the export of capital equipment and services by U.S.
          suppliers to develop the Tano offshore natural gas fields and to
          build pipelines to carry the fuel to a 130-megawatt barge-mounted
          electric power plant that will be built and installed near the
          village of Effasu on the Ghanaian coast.  In addition, Ex-Im Bank
          has approved a $62.5 million direct loan to support long-term
          operations and maintenance services for the gas field system and
          the power plant.

          Principal U.S. suppliers include Continental Engineering and
          Construction Company of Lafayette, Louisiana, and Westinghouse
          International Service Company of Orlando, Florida, as well as a
          number of oil and gasfield companies in Louisiana and Texas. 

          "This transaction opens doors for U.S. exporters in the oil and
          gas industry in West Africa," said Ex-Im Bank Acting President
          and Chairman Martin A. Kamarck.  "This project will be the first
          offshore gas development to be done in Ghana, which has
          considerable reserves and a great need for power to develop its
          infrastructure.  Ex-Im Bank is committed to helping U.S.
          companies establish a share in this new developing market."

          The Tano gas fields are part of the greater Ivory Coast
          geological basin system, which is marked by small-to-medium-sized
          hydrocarbon field systems containing mainly gas reserves. 
          Pipelines from the Ghanaian and Ivorien gas fields will feed into
          the barge-mounted power plant, which will supply electricity to
          Ghana's national power grid system.

          Ghana National Petroleum Company is the borrower.  The lender is
          Chemical Bank of New York.  Ex-Im Bank's financing is guaranteed
          by the Bank of Ghana.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that helps finance
          and promote the sale of U.S. goods and services around the world.

                                       # # # #

          (Editors note:  The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states
          that Export-Import Bank of the United States is always acceptable
          as a first reference and Ex-Im Bank is the acceptable second
          reference.)


          [Ex-Im Home Page]  |  [View Press Releases] 


          Export-Import Bank of the United States
          Revised : April 11, 1996


     <PAGE>

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEhttp://www.exim.gov:80/press/dec0195a.html

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          DECEMBER 1, 1995
          CONTACT:  Linda Formella  (202) 565-3200

          Opens Doors in $1 Billion Market
          for U.S. Environmental Exporters

          EX-IM BANK SIGNS AGREEMENT WITH POLAND'S NATIONAL FUND AND BANK
          FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

          Today the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)
          signed a memorandum of understanding with Poland's National Fund
          for Environmental Protection and Water Management, and Bos Bank,
          Poland's Bank for Environmental Protection, to facilitate
          financing for sales of U.S. products and services to Polish
          environmental projects.  The agreement will provide a clear
          process to finance U.S. sales to one of the world's biggest
          emerging markets for environmental technology.

          "This agreement sets the stage for terrific opportunities for
          U.S. environmental exporters," said Ex-Im Bank Director Julie
          Belaga.  "Poland has a strong financial infrastructure for
          environmental protection that serves as a model for other
          countries.  Poland's current and projected environmental spending
          is over a billion dollars per year and is expected to rise as the
          country continues its rapid economic growth.  This agreement will
          enable U.S. exporters to establish a solid share in this exciting
          market."

          The Memorandum of Understanding establishes a cooperative
          financing arrangement that will allow Poland's National Fund for
          Environmental Protection and Water Management and Bos Bank to
          leverage financial resources to support more environmental
          projects. 

          Director Julie Belaga, Kazimierz Chlopecki, Chairman of Poland's
          National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management,
          and Jozef Koziol, President of Bos Bank, signed the agreement. 
          The signing occurred in conjunction with the Polish-American
          Conference on the Innovative Financing of Environmental Projects
          in Poland, jointly sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection
          Agency and the Environmental Business Council of New England.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that finances the
          sale of U.S. goods and services around the world. 

                                       # # # #


          (Editors note:  The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states
          that Export-Import Bank of the United States is always acceptable
          as a first reference and Ex-Im Bank is the acceptable second
          reference.)





          [Ex-Im Home Page]  |  [View Press Releases] 

          Approved:  IC 12/12/95

          url: http://www.exim.gov/press/dec0195a.html



<PAGE>

          History of Ex-Im Bank       http://www.exim.gov:80/history.html


          History of Ex-Im Bank

          A Brief History of the Export-Import Bank of the United States

          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) was
          created in 1934 and established under its present law in 1945 to
          aid in financing and to facilitate U.S. exports.  Its creation
          was spurred by the economic conditions of the 1930's when exports
          were viewed as a stimulus to economic activity and employment.  A
          primary aim of  Ex-Im Bank was to foster trade between the United
          States and the Soviet Union.  During the post-World War II era,
          Ex-Im Bank helped U.S. companies participate in the
          reconstruction of Europe and Asia.

          Ex-Im Bank is encouraged to supplement, but not compete with
          private capital. Over the years, the private sector, Congress and
          the executive branch have debated Ex-Im Bank's role in a free
          market economy, where the private sector handles the majority of
          export financing.  For example in 1953, the President virtually
          liquidated Ex-Im Bank in an effort to reduce government spending
          and to ease a turf battle with the World Bank, but Congress
          intervened to keep Ex-Im Bank open.  According to supporters, Ex-
          Im Bank has historically filled gaps created when the private
          sector is reluctant to engage in export financing.

          Today Ex-Im Bank faces many of the same challenges and
          opportunities that it encountered when it was first created.  For
          example, the United States is renewing trade relations with the
          countries of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. 
          Increasingly, exports are seen as vital for sustaining U.S.
          economic growth.  The U.S. economy is much more internationalized
          and exports form a larger share of the gross national product
          than in the 1930's.  In addition, around the world trading and
          financial systems are more interdependent and international
          competition is incomparibly more intense.

          Ex-Im Bank provides guarantees of working capital loans for U.S.
          exporters, guarantees the repayment of loans or makes loans to
          foreign purchasers of U.S. goods and services and provides credit
          insurance against non-payment by foreign buyers for political or
          commercial risk.  Ex-Im Bank must also balance its mandate, that
          there exists a reasonable assurance of repayment.

          To carry out the Clinton Administration's strategy for continuing
          export growth, the Bank is focusing on critical areas such as
          emphasizing exports to developing countries, aggressively
          countering trade subsidies of other governments, stimulating
          small business transactions, promoting the export of
          environmentally beneficial goods and services, and expanding
          project finance capabilities.

          Ex-Im Bank is not an aid or development agency, but a government
          held corporation, managed by a Board of Directors consisting of a
          Chairman, Vice Chairman and three additional Board Members. 
          Members serve for staggered terms and are chosen and serve at the
          discretion of the President of the United States.

          Export-Import Bank of the United States
          Revised: May 30, 1996



<PAGE> 

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE http://www.exim.gov:80/press/jan2996.html

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          January 29, 1996

          Contact: Marianna Ohe 202-565-3200

          Project Finance Program Continues Expanding
          Tex., La., Ohio, Mo. Firms Among Beneficiaries

          EX-IM BANK FINANCES PROJECTS IN TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, PAKISTAN

          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) is
          providing nearly $300 million in project financing to support the
          sale of U.S. equipment and services for an ammonia plant in
          Trinidad and Tobago and a power plant in Pakistan.

          Ex-Im Bank's Board of Directors authorized $240 million in
          financing to support the sale of equipment and services by The
          M.W. Kellogg Co., Houston, TX, and other U.S. suppliers for an
          ammonia plant in Trinidad and Tobago.  It is Ex-Im's first
          limited recourse project finance transaction in that country and
          will support thousands of high-quality American jobs.  M.W.
          Kellogg said it will use scores of suppliers around the country
          for the project. 

          "This is the first transaction in what is expected to be a
          continuing emphasis on Ex-Im Bank's important project finance
          program under the leadership of Acting Chairman Martin Kamarck,"
          said Dianne S. Rudo, Vice President and Co-Head, Project Finance
          Division.  "We are delighted that the program is branching out
          into a new country and a new sector with this deal."

          The sponsors of the transaction are Farmland Industries, Inc.,
          Kansas City, MO, and Mississippi Chemical Corp., Yazoo City, MO. 
          The project company, the Farmland MissChem Ltd. owned jointly by
          the sponsors, will build, own and operate a 1,850 metric ton-per-
          day anhydrous ammonia plant at the Brighton/La Brea Industrial
          Estate on the island of Trinidad.

          M.W. Kellogg, the primary contractor, will build the plant.  The
          government-owned National Gas Co. of Trinidad and Tobago will
          supply the natural gas for the project.  The sponsors will buy
          the output from the ammonia plant.

          Ex-Im Bank will provide a guarantee of political risk only on a
          $234.6 million loan by ABN-AMRO North America, Chicago, IL,
          during the pre-completion phase of the project.  At project
          completion, Ex-Im Bank will replace the commercial bank financing
          with a $240 million direct loan.  The loan will be repaid in 20
          semiannual installments starting Dec. 15, 1998.   

          Ex-Im Bank recently also authorized more than $50 million in
          project financing in support of exports by Babcock and Wilcox
          Co., headquartered in New Orleans, LA with production facilities
          in Barberton, OH, for a 125-megawatt oil-fired power plant in
          Pakistan.

          Sponsors of the project are Cogen Technologies of Houston, TX,
          Capco Resources of Canada and Powerflow International of
          Pakistan.  Saba Power Company Ltd., the project company owned
          jointly by the sponsors, will build, own and operate the oil-
          fired power plant near Farouqabad in Pakistan's Punjab Province.

          "The Saba Power Project is the second privately developed, owned
          and operated power project in Pakistan to receive an Ex-Im Bank
          financing commitment recently," said Glen T. Matsumoto, Vice
          President and Co-Head, Project Finance Division.  "The Pakistan
          model for private power is impressive, and Ex-Im Bank is doing
          all it can to be there with timely financing support for U.S.
          suppliers."  The Bank last November provided a financing
          commitment of  $242.8 million for a 586-megawatt power plant in
          western Pakistan. 

          Babcock and Wilcox will provide engineering, procurement and
          construction for the Saba project.  The Water and Power
          Development Authority of Pakistan will buy the plant's entire
          capacity and output.

          Ex-Im Bank will provide more than $50 million in financing upon
          project completion, either as a comprehensive guarantee or a
          direct loan.  The financing is to be repaid in 24 semiannual
          installments starting April 15, 1998.  During the construction,
          Ex-Im Bank will provide a political risk only guarantee to
          support a commercial bank construction loan.

          Ex-Im Bank approved a record $2.1 billion in project financing in
          fiscal 1995, its first full year with a dedicated Project Finance
          Division, enabling American companies to participate in
          infrastructure development in fast-growing emerging markets
          throughout the world. 

          With limited recourse project finance, repayment is based on
          project revenues rather than a guarantee of the debt from the
          host country government.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that helps finance
          and promote the sale of U.S. goods and services around the world.

                                       # # # #

          (Editors note:  The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states
          that Export-Import Bank of the United States is always acceptable
          as a first reference and Ex-Im Bank is the acceptable second
          reference.)


          [Ex-Im Home Page]  |  [View Press Releases] 

          Approved:  IC 2/12/96

          url: http://www.exim.gov/press/JAN291996.html

<PAGE> 

                                http://www.exim.gov:80/press/jun2596.html

          Press Release - Ex-Im Bank Support of Environmental Exports
          Surges

          Press Release

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          June 25, 1996
          Contact:  Marianna Ohe  (202) 565-3200

          American Firms Tap Fast-Growing Emerging Markets

          EX-IM BANK SUPPORT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXPORTS SURGES

          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) is
          supporting record levels of environmentally beneficial U.S.
          exports  --  from water purification systems and wind energy
          equipment to major gas-fired power projects  --  Ex-Im Bank
          Director Julie D. Belaga told a Denver wind energy conference.

          "The world market for environmental technologies will be worth
          some $800 billion by the year 2025," Belaga noted.  "Many
          companies and countries are scrambling to secure a share of this
          booming new high-tech industry sector.  Ex-Im Bank wants to
          ensure that American companies capture their fair share of these
          markets."

          Ex-Im Bank financing and potential business support of
          environmental exports increased 84 percent from 26 cases in 1994
          to 48 cases in 1995, Belaga reported at the Windpower '96
          conference of the American Wind Energy Association.  Overall, the
          Bank approved $1.37 billion in financing supporting
          environmentally beneficial exports in fiscal 1995.

          "Many of the companies were first-time users of Ex-Im Bank,"
          Belaga said.  "This  demonstrates that our aggressive marketing
          programs aimed at promoting export of environmentally beneficial
          products and services are working."

          Just last week, Ex-Im Bank approved financing enabling Zond
          Systems Inc. of Tehachapi, CA to sell wind turbine generators to
          the People's Republic of China to be used by small utilities in
          Inner Mongolia, Liaoning and Guangdong Provinces, Belaga noted. 

          Since January, she said, the Bank has approved financing for nine
          renewable energy projects, ranging from a $440,000 loan guarantee
          for one small wind turbine to Mexico, to a $56 million loan
          guarantee for the sale of equipment from a Virginia company for
          the 1,800-megawatt Xiaolangdi hydroelectric project on the Yellow
          River in China.  The projects amount to a 300 percent increase in
          Ex-Im Bank's activity in the area of renewable energy since 1993.

          In a powerful demonstration of support for small business and
          environmental exports, the Bank earlier this year approved $50
          million in financing backing the sale of equipment by a small
          Nevada company for a geothermal project in the Philippines.  Ex-
          Im Bank's support enabled the Nevada firm to win the contract in
          the face of stiff competition from Japanese and French companies.
                                                                            
          Belaga noted that key high-growth economies -- China, India,
          Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, South Korea, Poland and
          Argentina -- are expected to account for over 40 percent of
          global import growth in the next 20 years.  She said Ex-Im Bank
          is determined to see that American companies can compete and win
          in these markets.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that helps finance
          and promote the sale of U.S. goods and services around the world. 
          The Bank authorized $15 billion in financing in Fiscal Year 1994.

                                       # # # #

          (Editors note:  The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states
          that Export-Import Bank of the United States is always acceptable
          as a first reference and Ex-Im Bank is the acceptable second
          reference.)


          Export-Import Bank of the United States
          Revised : June 27, 1996



<PAGE>

          Press Release        http://www.exim.gov:80/press/may1796b.html


          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          May 17, 1996
          Contact:  Marianna Ohe  (202) 565-3200

          Missouri, Kentucky, Oklahoma To Benefit

          EX-IM BANK FINANCES U.S. EXPORTS FOR ARGENTINE POWER PLANT

          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) is
          financing the $60 million sale by Black & Veatch of Kansas City,
          MO, and other U..S. suppliers of equipment and services for a
          power plant in Argentina.  Black & Veatch considers the Ex-Im
          Bank transaction significant in establishing the company's
          presence in the Latin American market.

          Black & Veatch will provide engineering services and equipment to
          Perez Companc S.A., a large integrated energy company in
          Argentina, for the 660-megawatt Genelba combined cycle power
          plant near Ezieza International Airport in Buenos Aires Province. 
          A major subsupplier is Henry Vogt Machinery Co., Louisville, KY,
          a 100-year-old family-owned company which is providing a $23
          million heat recovery steam generator for the plant.  Vogt
          estimates its part of the deal will help sustain directly at
          least 100 jobs in Kentucky and Oklahoma, and indirectly
          additional jobs at suppliers to Vogt.

          Ex-Im Bank's Board of Directors approved a $54 million guarantee
          of a loan by Citibank N A, New York, NY.  The loan will be repaid
          in 20 semiannual installments beginning June 15, 1998.

          Black & Veatch is part of a consortium with Siemens of Germany to
          build the $235 million Genelba plant.  The Missouri company is
          responsible for engineering and construction management,
          installation of equipment, civil site work, equipment
          procurement, and offsite work such as design of a substation,
          transmission lines and a gas line.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that helps finance
          and promote the sale of U.S. goods and services around the world.

          (The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states that Export-
          Import Bank of the United States is the first reference and Ex-Im
          Bank is the acceptable second reference.)


          Export-Import Bank of the United States
          Revised : May 22, 1996



<PAGE>
          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE http://www.exim.gov:80/press/nov0995.html

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          NOVEMBER 9, 1995
          Contact:  Marianna Ohe 202-565-3200

          Conn., Mass., N.J., N.Y., S.C. Among States to Benefit 
          Sustains Over 3,000 High-Quality U.S. Jobs

          EX-IM BANK SUPPORTS U.S. SALES FOR PAKISTAN POWER PROJECT

          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) approved
          $242.8 million in financing supporting the sale of equipment and
          services by General Electric Co. (GE), Fairfield, CT, and other
          U.S. companies for a 586-megawatt power plant in western
          Pakistan.  It is the second largest private power project in
          Pakistan and Ex-Im Bank's first project finance deal in that
          country.  The transaction will bolster more than 3,000 American
          jobs. 

          "Ex-Im Bank is delighted to back American companies'
          participation in this landmark project," said Glen T. Matsumoto,
          Vice President and Co-Head of Ex-Im Bank's Project Finance
          Division.  "The Government of Pakistan has extended extraordinary
          efforts to create a private power structure which carefully
          allocates project risks between investors, the government, and
          lenders in pursuit of satisfying the electrical demand for their
          country.  Ex-Im Bank is committed to supporting strong project
          finance frameworks such as Pakistan's."

          Matsumoto stressed the importance to Ex-Im Bank of achieving
          financial closing for the project in an expedited manner.  He
          said the Bank hopes to provide financing for several other
          Pakistan private power projects in the near future.

          The project company, Uch Power Limited (UPL) based in Islamabad,
          will build, own and operate the combined cycle gas-fired plant
          near Dera Murad Jamali in Pakistan's Baluchistan Province. 
          Project sponsors and owners of UPL are General Electric Capital
          Corp., Tenaska Inc. and Hawkins Oil and Gas, all of the United
          States;  Midlands Electricity plc, of the U.K.;  Hasan Associates
          (Pvt.) Ltd., of Pakistan;  and the World Bank's International
          Finance Corp. (IFC).

          GE will manufacture equipment for the project in New York and
          South Carolina as well as subcontracting portions of the order to
          firms in other locations.  Raytheon Engineers and Constructors,
          Inc., Lexington, MA, will work with GE to provide project
          construction oversight services from its Lyndhurst, NJ, facility.

          Pakistan's Water and Power Development Authority will buy the
          plant's entire electricity output for 25 years.  The plant will
          use indigenous gas, unlike most power projects which require more
          expensive imported fuel. 

           Ex-Im Bank will provide a guarantee for political risk to
          commercial banks during the construction phase of the project. 
          At completion, the Bank will replace the commercial funding with
          a $156.6 million direct loan on a limited recourse finance basis
          -- with repayment based on the cash flow from the project rather
          than a guarantee of the debt by the host government.  In
          addition, Ex-Im will provide a $86.2 million loan facility
          directly to the government of Pakistan, which will in turn be
          invested in the Uch Project as part of the government's private
          power initiative.

          Co-financing the project with Ex-Im Bank are the World Bank
          (IBRD), the IFC and a commercial bank group headed by ABN Amro
          and Deutsche Bank.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that helps finance
          and promote the sale of U.S. goods and services around the world. 
          The Bank authorized $2.1 billion in limited recourse project
          financing in fiscal 1995.  Ex-Im Bank exposure in Pakistan,
          including the Uch Project, currently totals more than half a
          billion dollars.


                                       # # # #

          (Editors note:  The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states
          that Export-Import Bank of the United States is always acceptable
          as a first reference and Ex-Im Bank is the acceptable second
          reference.)

          [Ex-Im Home Page]  |  [View Press Releases] 

          Approved:  IC 12/5/95
          url: http://www.exim.gov/press/Nov9.html



<PAGE> 

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE http://www.exim.gov:80/press/oct0295.html

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
          OCTOBER 2, 1995

          Contact:  Marianna Ohe 202-565-3200

          California, Connecticut, New York Companies Among Beneficiaries
          Tens of Thousands of Jobs for U.S. Workers Across Country EX-IM
          BANK PROJECT FINANCING TOPS $2.1 BILLION IN FY 1995


          The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) approved
          a record $2.1 billion in project financing in Fiscal Year 1995
          supporting eight projects in countries as far-flung as the
          Philippines, Turkey and Colombia.

          Ex-Im Bank's new approach to limited recourse project finance has
          enabled American companies to participate in infrastructure
          development in fast-growing emerging markets throughout the
          world.  

          "This financing represents tens of thousands of high quality jobs
          for American workers across many industrial sectors," said Ex-Im
          Bank Chairman Kenneth D. Brody.  "The world is changing and a
          proactive Ex-Im Bank is changing with it.  Over the past three
          years the Bank averaged $150 million per year in project
          financing, or one case per year.  This year, our first with a
          project finance group, we did eight cases totaling $2.1 billion. 
          And we expect an additional 50 percent increase in Fiscal 1996."

          The Bank's Board of Directors recently approved over $900 million
          for three projects:

          Cilicap Refinery Project -- Indonesia.  Ex-Im Bank approved $296
          million in financing supporting the sale of equipment and
          services by Fluor Daniel, Inc., Irvine, California, for the
          expansion of the Cilicap oil refinery in Indonesia on the
          southern coast of Java.  Pertamina (Perusahaan Pertambangan
          Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara), the Indonesian national oil company,
          is the sole sponsor and will own 100 percent of the project.  The
          financing is arranged through an offshore trustee.  The project
          involves removing equipment bottlenecks and installing more
          efficient equipment to process larger amounts of material in the
          refinery.

          Termobarranquilla Power Project -- Colombia.  Ex-Im Bank approved
          $161 million in financing supporting the sale of power generation
          equipment and services by U.S. affiliates of ABB Energy Ventures,
          Stamford, Connecticut, and other U.S. suppliers for a gas-fired
          power project on the Magdalena River near Barranquilla, Colombia. 
          The project represents a dramatic step in Colombia's effort to
          privatize electrical assets and develop the power sector to meet
          growing demand.  It is the first independent power project in
          Colombia with power sales to a major state-owned utility, CORELCA
          (Corporacion Electrica de la Costa Atlantica), and CORELCA's
          first limited recourse project financing.  Sponsors of the
          project include Asea Brown Boveri, U.S. and Switzerland;  Energy
          Initiatives, Inc., a subsidiary of General Public Utilities of
          the U.S.;  the Lancaster Distral Group with affiliates in the
          U.S. and Colombia;  and CORELCA.  A new 750-megawatt gas-fired
          power plant will be built and an existing 230-megawatt plant
          rehabilitated.

          Samalayuca Power Project -- Mexico.  Ex-Im Bank approved $477
          million in financing supporting the sale of U.S. equipment and
          services by General Electric Co., Schenectady, New York, Bechtel
          Enterprises, Inc., San Francisco, California and other U.S.
          suppliers to build a 690-megawatt combined cycle power plant in
          Chihuahua State in Mexico.  It is the first privately funded
          power project in Mexico and will help meet the country's growing
          demand for electricity.  The sponsors of the project are General
          Electric;  Bechtel; El Paso Natural Gas Co., El Paso, TX;  and
          ICA Fluor Daniel, S.A. de R.L., Mexico.  Ex-Im Bank's Board of
          Directors found that the project, located about 30 miles south of
          El Paso, not only meets all relevant Ex-Im Bank and Mexican
          government standards for thermal power, but also would have no
          significant impact on the environment of the territory of the
          United States (FONSI).

          Earlier this year, Ex-Im Bank approved financing for five other
          project finance transactions:

          -$540 million for the sale of U.S. equipment and services for the
          Paiton Power Project in Indonesia

          $67 million for the sale of U.S. technology, equipment and
          services for the Comsigua Hot Briquetted Iron Plant in Punta
          Cucillo, Venezuela

          $165 million for the sale of U.S. mining equipment and services
          for the El-Abra Copper Mine Project in Chile in El Loa province

          $228 million in financing for the sale of U.S. power generation
          equipment for the Marmara Power Project in Turkey west of
          Istanbul $182 million for the sale of U.S. equipment and services
          for the Sual Power Project in the Philippines.

          With limited recourse project finance, repayment is based on
          project revenues rather than a guarantee of the debt from the
          host country government.  Demand for this financing in developing
          countries has soared in recent years, stemming from these
          governments' emphasis on privatization, the need to reduce
          sovereign debt obligations, and projections of unprecedented
          economic growth in these emerging markets.

          Ex-Im Bank is an independent government agency that helps finance
          and promote the sale of U.S. goods and services around the world. 
          The Bank authorized $15 billion in financing in Fiscal Year 1994.
                                       # # # #

                 (Editors note:  The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states
          that Export-Import Bank of the United States is always acceptable
          as a first reference and Ex-Im Bank is the acceptable second
          reference.)

          [Ex-Im Home Page]  |  [View Press Releases] 

            Approved:  IC 11/5/95

            url: http://www.exim.gov/press/oct2595.html


<PAGE> 


          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE http://www.exim.gov:80/press/oct2595.html

          MEDIA ADVISORY
          October 25, 1995
          CONTACT: Niki T. Shepperd (202) 565-3200

          Enormous Opportunities for U.S. Exporters

          EX-IM BANK VICE CHAIRMAN MARTIN A. KAMARCK TO VISIT CHINA 

          Export-Import Bank Vice Chairman Martin A. Kamarck and other
          senior level bank officials will visit China November 1-3, in an
          effort to promote U.S. exports and further strengthen and expand
          the Bank's relationship in this important market.

          "We view China as one of the most important and fastest growing
          emerging markets and we are committed to supporting U.S.
          exporters' participation,"  said Vice Chairman Kamarck. "We are
          very excited about the enormous opportunities in China and want
          exporters to know Ex-Im Bank financing is available."

          As part of the Bank's efforts to develop business oppportunities
          for U.S. companies, Ex-Im Bank's support to this market is
          underscored by the posting of Ex-Im Bank loan officer Walter B.
          Hill, Jr., in China.   Hill will work in Beijing and Shanghai,
          China until approximately March 1996, marketing the Bank programs
          and educate potential buyers, lenders, and government officials
          on the use of Ex-Im Bank financing for U.S. exports.  

          While in Beijing, Kamarck will meet with a variety of potential
          buyers and U.S. companies interested in participating in the
          tremendous growth needs certain to come in  China.  "We want to
          ensure exporters are fully informed on the financing options
          available through the Bank," Kamarck added.

          In fiscal year 1995, Ex-Im Bank supported $1 billion of exports
          to the People's Republic of China.  Since 1981, Ex-Im Bank has
          supported $4 billion of U.S. exports to China.  Ex-Im Bank is an
          independent government agency that finances the sale of U.S.
          goods and services around the world.  In FY'95, the Bank
          authorized $11.9 billion in financing.

                                         ###

          (The Bank follows the AP Stylebook, which states that Export-
          Import Bank of the United States is the acceptable first
          reference and Ex-Im Bank is acceptable on second reference.)

          [Ex-Im Home Page]  |  [View Press] 

          Approved:  IC 11/5/95
          url: http://www.exim.gov/press/oct2595.html

<PAGE>

          Talking Points               http://www.exim.gov:80/talkpt.html

          Highlights and Talking Points

          EXPORT-IMPORT BANK  IS A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE,  LEAN U.S. GOVERNMENT
          AGENCY WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO PRESERVE AND CREATE JOBS  HERE IN
          THE UNITED STATES BY LEVELING THE FINANCIAL PLAYING FIELD IN
          TODAY'S  FIERCELY COMPETITIVE WORLD TRADE ARENA.    

          EX-IM BANK SUPPORT FOR AMERICAN JOBS

          Ex-Im Bank is doing an excellent job achieving its mission.  
          During the last 3 years  alone, Ex-Im Bank financing supported
          nearly $47.7 billion of U.S. exports representing jobs for just
          under one million Americans.   

          COMPANIES FROM ACROSS AMERICA BENEFIT

          U.S. exporting companies from across the United States benefit
          from Ex-Im Bank financing programs.  Over the last five years, a
          total of 6,295 different companies, partnerships, or sole
          proprietors  were assisted by Ex-Im Bank, 3,760 of which are
          small businesses.

          EX-IM BANK SUPPORT FOR SMALL AND  MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES

          80% of all Ex-Im Bank fiscal year 1995 transactions benefited
          small businesses.  The dollar level of this support was $2.4
          billion.  While all of Ex-Im Bank's programs are available to
          support small and medium-sized businesses, particular programs
          have been designed specifically to fit the needs of these
          entities, not otherwise addressed by the private market place.

          Ex-Im Bank's Working Capital Guarantee Program assists small and
          medium-sized businesses in obtaining crucial working capital to
          fund their export activities.

          Ex-Im Bank's Export Credit Insurance Program provides risk
          mitigation on export receivables through its Small Business
          Insurance Policy, its Short-Term Environmental Export Insurance
          Policy,  its Short-Term Single Buyer Policy, and its Umbrella
          Policy.

          TheUmbrella Policy is a great example of a public-private
          partnership effort as the policy allows state agencies, export
          trading and management companies, insurance brokers and similar
          agencies to administrate Ex-Im Bank programs, thereby assisting
          clients in obtaining export credit insurance.

          EX-IM BANK STRETCHES BUDGET DOLLARS  FOR MAXIMUM BENEFIT

          Ex-Im Bank has done an outstanding job of stretching its budget 
          dollars as far as possible.  In fiscal year 1995, Ex-Im Bank
          leveraged its $674.8 million program budget to support nearly
          $13.5 billion in U.S. exports.   This represents a  leverage
          ratio of 20:1.  That is, for every dollar of budget expended, Ex-
          Im Bank provided a return of $20 worth of U.S. exports. 

          EX-IM BANK IS PRUDENT WITH THE PUBLIC PURSE AND HAS A GOOD
          FINANCIAL TRACK RECORD

          Loan losses due to "bad deals" during the past 16 years (1980-
          1995) were only $2.5 billion of $119 billion in exports financed,
          rendering a loan loss ratio of 2.1%.   By comparison, U.S.
          insured commercial banks' loan loss ratio was 6% on loans to
          foreign governments, and 3.3% on loans to individuals under
          credit card plans, for the 12 year period 1984-1995.  [1984 is
          the first year for this type of data disaggregation.  Source: 
          Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.] 

          U.S. EXPORTERS FACE STIFF FOREIGN COMPETITION

          Future growth and sustained employment will come from exports to
          developing countries.   U.S. exporting companies compete against
          foreign competitors  for world market share.  Those foreign
          companies, some of which are already "state" owned,  benefit from
          aggressive financing provided by their own government's export
          credit agency.  In 1994, the Japanese and French export credit
          agencies financed 39.9% and 19.4% of their respective country's
          exports.  By comparison, Ex-Im Bank financed 3.3% of total U.S.
          exports. 

          EX-IM BANK'S BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1977

          Ex-Im Bank's budget request for fiscal year 1977 (FY '97
          commences 10/1/96) is $736.6 million for programs and $47.6
          million for administrative expenses.  The House and Senate
          Appropriations Committees are expected to act on this request in
          the next two months.

          CURRENT CORPORATE WELFARE DEBATE

          Ex-Im Bank faces criticism from those who choose to believe that
          the world is economically perfect and that there is no need for a
          national export credit agency.   Critics refer to Ex-Im Bank as
          "corporate welfare" and talk about elimination of the Bank.  
          This would be unilateral disarmament in a trade battle for world
          market share.    Ex-Im Bank provides financing only for those
          transactions where the private sector either cannot or will not
          provide the requisite financing or the requisite terms  in order
          to make the U.S. exporter's bid competitive. 

          Export-Import Bank of the United States
          Revised : May 6, 1996


<PAGE> 

          Chairman's Remarks          http://www.exim.gov:80/tspeech.html

          Chairman's Remarks

          Dinner Speaker: Martin A. Kamarck, President and Chairman, Ex-Im
          Bank

          [Transcript from tape recording.]

          Good evening.  My name is Tino, and I am a recovering lawyer.

          People joke about lawyers, and it is true that, to succeed as a
          lawyer, you have to have a good nose for new business.  My
          business as a lawyer was finance, and it's been five years since
          I practiced.  But I got to tell you, my nose is twitching
          tonight.  I smell business.  I smell success.  I think there's
          going to be a lot of business that's done in the corridors of
          this hotel in the next 24 hours, and we're here tonight to
          celebrate that.

          We're here tonight to celebrate the fact that we got a lot of
          business done in the last 12 months.  We're here tonight to
          celebrate the fact that a lot of business can be and, with your
          help, will be done in the next few years.

          We are here tonight to celebrate the moment, this moment, when,
          if we seize it, we can turn the tide of the export battle, and we
          can win.

          The most important thing I want to say to you tonight and to your
          colleagues and coworkers and competitors and customers and
          suppliers and to the good people who represent us all in
          Congress, my message is that victory in the export battle will be
          neither assured nor automatic.  We pause to celebrate, but also
          to remind ourselves that the stakes are very high and that we
          must work together.  We must work more, harder, better, smarter,
          faster, to win growth for the American economy, to win high-wage
          jobs for American workers, to win market share for high-value
          American products, goods, and services.

          We have a lot to celebrate.  The opportunities, the potential
          markets are vast.  In the past ten years, imports bought by non-
          OECD countries--non-OECD countries--more than doubled from $600
          billion to almost $1.5 trillion.  And we expect them to more than
          double again in the next ten years.

          The U.S. has finally started to capture its fair share of these
          booming markets.  We started from a low base, but here's the
          kicker.  Last year, the growth in exports from America was
          astonishing--10 percent.  This year, with a stronger dollar, 8
          percent is predicted.  This good news didn't just happen.  We did
          it, all of us working together.<P>

          Big exports, big exporters are winning.  As the U.S. share of
          world exports has grown, that coming from the largest exporters,
          typically among the largest companies, has stayed pretty
          constant.  This means that these relatively few companies who are
          battling every day for big, high-profile projects against big,
          monopolistic, government-supported foreign competitors are
          winning.

          By the same token, the share of the fast-growing export pie that
          comes from small business is also keeping pace.  Small business
          exporters are winning.  Thousands of small businesses are
          exporting more into global markets, and thousands of small
          businesses are exporting for the first time every year.

          We see it at Ex-Im Bank.  You've heard that last year almost 80
          percent of the transactions we did directly benefited small
          business exporters.  We're not talking sub-suppliers here. 
          Eighty percent directly benefiting small business exporters.

          Now, we like to brag that this is because Ex-Im Bank has become
          more useful and more accessible for smaller exporters, and that
          is true.  But just among us tonight, it is also true that these
          small business customers are getting more motivated to compete
          for export business, more sophisticated about using financing to
          win that business, and, therefore, smarter about helping us to
          help them.  These small business exporters are winning.<P>

          And there's an important reason why U.S. exporters, big and
          small, are starting finally to gain ground in the battle for
          share in the world's emerging markets.  Their trusty sidekick has
          decided to come out from under the table and join the fight. 
          Trade bankers, phone home.<P>

          Your long exile in the wilderness is coming to an end.

          For too often and too long, at too many commercial banks the top
          management didn't listen to you, didn't listen to me.  But guess
          what?  They're listening now to your customers, and what they're
          hearing is that those customers want more trade finance services,
          and they want those trade finance services delivered faster,
          better, and smarter.  You are the winners.  We are the winners. 
          America is the winner.

          But what about Ex-Im Bank?  I've been talking for, what, about
          five minutes now, and I've hardly told you how wonderful we are. 
          Well, who am I to defy conventional Washington wisdom?  There is
          a buzz abroad in this town.  We've all heard it.  Something about
          corporate welfare.  It says that Ex-Im Bank is pernicious
          government interference in the marketplace.  It says that we pick
          winners and losers, that we select industries, markets, sectors
          to support according to some secret agenda.  It says that
          America's exporters don't need Ex-Im Bank, that they and their
          commercial bank partners will do just fine without us.  And if
          without us you lose business, well, the marketplace has spoken;
          and if you lose that business, you deserve to lose that business.

          It says that Ex-Im Bank is inconsequential, that we don't make a
          difference, that our tiny budget could be taken away altogether
          and no one would even notice.  It says--and here I have to quote
          directly from a Washington think tank report from the Cato
          Institute--"that money spent through Ex-Im Bank provides no
          corresponding societal benefit."  "No corresponding societal
          benefit."

          Who will dispute this conventional wisdom?  I will.  The facts
          will. 

          I've been at Ex-Im Bank for three years now.  I am proud to
          continue the tradition of activism started by John Macomber and
          Gene Lawson.  I am proud to have been a part of Ken Brody's team. 
          Together we picked up the pace of change.  I promise you tonight,
          with your help, the momentum will continue.

          We have the facts, we have the truth on our side.  The fact is
          Ex-Im Bank can and must serve all of our customers, America's
          exporters, and your lending partners, wherever and whenever you
          need us.  Of course, we have to have prudent standards.  Of
          course, we must carry out this mission as efficiently as we
          possibly can.  But we must have the resources we need, you need,
          to get the job done.

          The fact is America's exporters and the workers you employ do
          need Ex-Im Bank.  You need us to make the difference.  Everyone
          in this room has a story to tell.  Every day you take huge risks,
          operating risks, balance sheet risks, often even personal risks,
          to do business, to establish trading relationships, to build
          credibility in the world's most difficult markets.  Time after
          time, deal after deal, you face not just bruising competition on
          market factors of price, quality, service, but also official
          foreign government-sponsored financing support.  Almost always
          that support is backed by proportionately greater resources than
          the U.S. has made available to Ex-Im Bank and our sister
          agencies.

          To use the phrase you heard earlier, claimed by Fred, we cannot
          under these circumstances unilaterally disarm.  We cannot deprive
          you of the financing support you need to make the sale.  And the
          fact is a little bit of Ex-Im Bank goes a long way.  We don't
          have to spend a lot of money, and compared to the big picture, we
          don't even have to support a lot of exports to make a big, big
          difference.

          Ex-Im Bank supports the financing of only about 3 percent of
          America's total exports, but in those key emerging markets, where
          our exporters are slugging it out to win market share for capital
          goods, where trading relationships established today will pull
          the American economy into the 21st century, in these crucially
          important markets we support between 10 and 40 percent of
          America's exports.  We support those sales and only those sales
          where we make the difference.  And for every dollar, every one
          dollar set aside against the resulting rusk, America gets $17 to
          $20 of new export revenues.

          The fact is Ex-Im Bank may be the best bargain the Federal
          Government offers the American people.

          Ex-Im Bank's tiny share of the federal budget buys tremendous
          benefits.  The deals we've supported directly link to 358,000 new
          jobs, high-wage jobs in this country.  Take into account sub-
          suppliers, and there are as many as two million more added to the
          plus side of the jobs column.

          We have helped almost 6,000 companies win sales that they
          otherwise would have lost.  These companies employ people in more
          than 2,000 cities and towns across this nation, in 99 percent of
          the congressional districts and in every single one of the 50
          states.  The fact is dollars spent through Ex-Im Bank provide a
          whole lot of societal benefit.

          Finally, looking forward, the fact is that potential imports in
          emerging markets will grow at 10 to 15 percent every single year
          for the foreseeable future.  It is important, it is crucially
          important for our country, its economy, its workers, our
          children, that American exports keep pace, that at the very least
          we do not forever cede market share to the French, the British,
          the Japanese, the Germans.

          That responsibility is on our shoulders.  That opportunity lies
          before us.  Ex-Im Bank must be here and have the resources
          required to help you keep winning.

          Those are the facts.  I believe they're important.  I want to
          tell you tonight that I intend to fight for what I believe in.  I
          also happen to believe that you agree with me.  As we celebrate
          together tonight, I want to ask you to join with me in dedicating
          ourselves to two principles.

          First, we have to help each other.  In my leadership of the Bank,
          I have committed myself first and foremost to customer service. 
          We must and we will deliver for you more, better, faster,
          smarter.  In return, I ask you, work with us in partnership. 
          Understand what we can do and what we can't do.  Help us to
          understand your needs.  Most importantly, work with us to find
          creative solutions to our common problems.

          Second, we have got to tell our side of the story.  Here's
          another quote.  These words have as much meaning for us today as
          when they were spoken a year ago.  "Measure our performance any
          way that you choose--economic growth, job creation, the value of
          the services we provide, the contracts that have been signed with
          our support.  We believe that our plan, our strategy, is working-
          -is working for the American people, is working for American
          firms."

          Those words were said to us at this time last year at this
          conference by Ron Brown.

          He was right.  We know it.  It is our duty to tell it.  Tell is
          in the board rooms, but also tell it in the living rooms.  We can
          tell it on Wall Street, but we also must tell it on Main Street. 
          We can tell it from the mountaintop, but we also have to tell it
          on the shop floor.  Tell your colleagues, your customers, your
          coworkers, your partners, your suppliers, but also tell your
          friends, tell your families.  Tell it in Washington.

          This isn't about politics.  This isn't about partisanship.  This
          isn't about ideology.  It is about common sense.  And, yes, it is
          about welfare, economic welfare, America--America's welfare.  It
          is about the welfare of our workers, our families, our future. 
          Tell it.

          Thank you.  Have a wonderful time this evening, and get some
          deals done.


          Export-Import Bank of the United States
          Revised : May 14, 1996








                                                             EXHIBIT B-4


                          RISKS CONSIDERED BY CONSOLIDATED 
                         IN CONNECTION WITH FOREIGN VENTURES

                  A.   Hurdle Rate Study

                  Consolidated has developed a formula and process to
             calculate recommended hurdle rates, or the minimum
             acceptable internal rate of return on an after-tax
             discounted cash flow basis, for prospective CNG
             International investments in foreign countries.  For
             domestic business units, the rate of return for new
             investments must exceed Consolidated's weighted average cost
             of capital ("WACC") for that particular business.  The
             hurdle rate for international projects must be increased to
             cover the additional risks of operating in a foreign
             business environment and the uncertainty of projects in the
             development and construction stages, or with complex or new
             technology.    

                  Hurdle rates are calculated for high and low commercial
             risk projects in selected countries, primarily those in Asia
             and Latin America that are identified as target markets. 
             The formula starts with Consolidated's WACC for a similar
             domestic business, and then adds risk premiums for the
             particular country and the stage of the project.  Higher
             hurdle rates are applied to projects in the development and
             construction phases.  Tables are then prepared showing each
             country and the appropriate hurdle rates for each project
             stage.  The tables will be revised on a periodic basis to
             reflect changes in the country risk premiums, and to include
             countries where CNG International is actively developing
             projects.

                  The hurdle rate table can then be used by developers to
             screen potential projects.  If the expected market rate is
             below the hurdle rate, the project can be rejected or the
             developer can look for income enhancements to boost the
             expected return on the project.  For example, Consolidated
             may be able to earn additional income by securing the
             Operation & Maintenance contract, or by managing the fuel
             supply to the project.

                  After the project passes the initial screening process,
             a more intensive review of the project and the country will
             be undertaken.  The hurdle rate will be further refined to
             take into account the risk profile of the project.  For
             example, the rate may be reduced if the developer is able to
             (i) purchase political risk insurance from the Overseas
             Private Investment Corporation ("OPIC"), a U.S. Government
             agency, or the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
             ("MIGA"), a World Bank unit, or (ii) obtain sovereign
             guarantees from the host government for any of the project
             contracts or for foreign exchange availability.   The rate
             may also be modified upward or downward if a detailed review
             forecasts a significant change in the fundamental economic
             or political conditions of the country.  There are a whole
             host of factors that would lead to a revision of the hurdle
             rate for a specific project.  Many are identified in the
             detailed discussion of risks that follows.

                  B.   Consolidated's Expertise in Managing, mitigating
                       Country and Other Risk

                  Consolidated has taken a number of steps to identify
             and manage the risks inherent in foreign investments.  The
             principal risks identified are as follows:

                       Commercial risk
                       Country risk 
                       Construction risk
                       Development risk
                       Technical risk

                  There are also force majeure risks caused by natural
             disasters or accidents such as fires, floods, storms or
             earthquakes.  These risks are usually mitigated by
             commercial insurance.  The insurance should cover not only
             any asset loss, but also business interruption, including
             loss of revenues for delays in plant operations caused by
             natural disasters.  Force majeure risks are not included in
             the hurdle rate, but are captured as an expense in the
             financial model.

                  Consolidated has developed a framework and methodology
             for valuing the five categories of risks listed above as
             follows.

                       1.   Commercial Risk

                  Commercial credit risk includes assessment of the
             sponsor, management, the market, the project's cash
             generation capacity and its underlying components, the
             financial structure and funding, the size of the project and
             its life cycle, and its legal and institutional structure.  

                  The other sponsors or joint venture partners should be
             capable, credible, and experienced, and have adequate
             financial standing.  Important factors include:

                  The reputation, credibility and quality of the partner
                  based on the partner's character, and determined
                  through personal contacts and objective references such
                  as the local chamber of commerce or competition.

                  The sponsor's knowledge of the business based on proven
                  expertise in the specific industry, and experience over
                  a complete business cycle.  Less experience corresponds
                  to higher risk. Experience in other industries may
                  compensate for lack of experience in the specific
                  industry.

                  The sponsor's financial capacity and commitment to the
                  project, as confirmed by local banks or ratings
                  agencies.  Higher commitment reflects lower risk. 

                  The partners motivation or real business interest in
                  the project.  There should be a balance between the
                  contributions to the project and the respective
                  rewards, as well as a common interest and compatibility
                  that bind the partners together. The returns should be
                  derived primarily from the project rather than from
                  corollary activities, such as providing raw materials
                  or distribution services.

                  The management of the project is normally closely
             related to the sponsor, and should have many of the same
             attributes.  The quality and capability of the management
             team, its integrity, character, expertise in the industry,
             and commitment to the project are essential to the success
             of the project.  A management team with more years in the
             industry or a similar business translates into lower risk.  
             The key manager's  success in operating and implementing
             similar projects should be verified by reputable local
             sources.  A poor or unproven record will tend to increase
             project risk.

                  The most important market risk factor is the supply and
             demand of the project's product or output, and the ability
             of the project to successfully place its product in the
             market.  The launching of a new product for an entirely new
             market would imply a higher risk than an already established
             market.  Strong unmet demand will tend to lower project risk
             by increasing the chance of placing the project's output at
             an attractive price, while excess supply will depress prices
             and increase risk.  The ability of a project to increase
             prices to compensate for operating cost increases is much
             greater if the demand for the output is inelastic,
             indicating lower market risk.  The ability of the project to
             adjust production to take advantage of price changes also
             decreases risk.

                  The reliability and scale of the commercial network of
             the company is a key factor.  Regardless of how efficient a
             producer may be, it will fail if it is unable to place its
             output in the market.  A higher market share implies lower
             market risk.  The competitive advantage of the company
             relative to other domestic or international producers and
             the contribution of the project to increase market share
             should be assessed as part of the market research.

                  The operating risk of the project is based on its cash
             flow capacity.  The project is the principle source of cash
             generation to meet its debt obligations and reward its
             shareholders.  Besides marketing and management issues, the
             main elements of determining cash flow are i) process
             aspects, ii) technical assistance, iii) engineering and
             construction, iv) raw materials and services, v) cost
             competitiveness, vi) and other factors specific to the
             project.  The project financial projections and company
             financial statements are used to quantify the cash flow
             capacity of the project.  If financial projections show that
             a project's capacity to service debt or to provide an
             attractive return to shareholders is very sensitive to
             relatively small changes in key variables such as price,
             operating cost or capacity utilization, then the project
             entails higher risk.

                  The debt service ratio ("DSC") measures the borrower's
             ability to pay principle and interest on long term
             obligations out of earnings.  The DSC is defined as:  (net
             income + depreciation + interest) divided by (interest
             payments + current maturities of principle on outstanding
             debt).  A DSC below 1 indicates very high risk, while a DSC
             of 1.5 or higher correlates to low risk.  The rate of return
             on the project should be sufficient to adequately compensate
             providers of debt and equity capital.

                  The number, quality and reliability of providers of key
             inputs/raw materials is a critical factor in influencing a
             project's ability to operate economically.  A restricted
             number of suppliers may control key inputs and determine
             which producers survive or fail.  Highly volatile pricing of
             inputs may break a project if it is unable to adjust its
             selling price accordingly.

                  The project must have the capacity to generate
             sufficient exchange to cover foreign currency expenditures
             for imports or debt service.  The risk may be mitigated if
             the price of the company's output in the local market is
             indexed to the U.S. dollar.

                  A March 29, 1996 analysis by Salomon Brothers concluded
             that the beta or volatility of Consolidated's local
             distribution business was lower than the transmission
             business, which in turn was lower than the exploration and
             production business.  Many of the power plant projects and
             other investments that CNG International will pursue have
             commercial risk characteristics similar to the local
             distribution business.  For example, a gas turbine project
             may mitigate risk with carefully crafted power purchase
             agreements and fuel supply contracts.  Foreign investors are
             also protected by financing or insurance from U.S. or
             multinational government organizations such OPIC, Exim Bank,
             MIGA or the International Finance Corporation.  The
             investment then acts like an annuity, with relatively low
             commercial risk.  For projects of this type, a low
             commercial risk "WACC" is assigned.

                  Other potential CNG International projects have
             commercial risk characteristics similar to the exploration
             and production business.  For example, the revenues of a
             pipeline project may depend on the volume of gas, or a
             merchant power plant project may depend on electric demand
             and competitive electric rates.  For projects of this type,
             a high commercial risk WACC is assigned.

                  In order to evaluate domestic and international project
             opportunities on a consistent basis, the international WACC
             hurdle rates will be adjusted for significant interest rate
             or Consolidated capital structure changes when the
             Consolidated Treasurer's Department publishes new domestic
             hurdle rates for the various business segments.

                       2.   Country Risk

                  The country risk for a  project is comprised of
             political, macro and foreign exchange risk.  Political Risk
             includes investment losses due to war, insurrection and
             terrorism.  A coup or change in government by force may lead
             to anti-foreign legislation, termination of agreements or
             loss of rights which impairs  the value of the investment. 
             Strikes and industrial disputes may be politically
             motivated.

                  Macro Risk for a particular country considers such
             elements as the state and growth of the economy, inflation
             and the foreign exchange situation, and savings, investment
             and fiscal matters.

                  Foreign Exchange Risk represents the chance of loss on
             foreign currency exchange due to transfer or convertibility
             risk that remittances abroad from the borrower or investee
             are not allowed due to the lack of hard currency reserves,
             foreign exchange controls or nationalization.  Devaluation
             risks are not included as part of country risk, but are
             considered in the project cash flow analysis.

                  The stability or relative macroeconomic condition of a
             country can be  measured by outside independent agencies. 
             This is measured by risk ratings from The Economist,
                                                   --- ---------
             Euromoney and Institutional Investor.  Another indicator is
             ---------     ----------------------
             a country's past due debt, as well as sovereign ratings by
             Standard & Poor's and Moody's.
             -----------------     -------

                  The country's influence on the specific industry sector
             in which a particular project will operate must also be
             considered.  Some aspects include: (i) the number and size
             of the enterprises that are allowed or licensed by the
             government, (ii) historical performance of the sector and
             its future projections in light of the developments of the
             overall economy,  (iii) the extent of oligopoly conditions
             that might hinder competition from small or medium sized
             entrants into the market, and (iv) government policies and
             regulatory framework affecting the sector.

                  Nationalization or creeping expropriation and the
             degree of protectionism in a specific industry due to
             artificial government subsidies or regulations, including
             tariffs and quotas must also be considered.  There may also
             be protection and regulatory environment components such as
             (i) official attitude; a project that enjoys official
             priority may have a lower risk profile, and (ii) investment
             content; country profiles should be favorable to private
             sector investment.  A project which relies heavily on
             protective legislation for its viability may pose a high
             risk of failure if government policy changes.

                  A "country risk premium" is added to the WACC to
             account for the additional return required by U.S. investors
             to cover country/political risks; such as expropriation,
             currency blockage, and other political acts that reduce the
             present value of the investment.  The premium may be defined
             as the spread  between foreign currency denominated bonds
             issued by the host country and U.S. treasury bonds.  Salomon
             Brothers calculated the premium for selected countries in
             their March 1996 study by averaging the spreads on Yankee
             and Brady Bonds.  For countries with no Yankee or Brady
             Bonds, Salomon recommends an estimate of the spreads from an
             analysis of the Euromoney or Institutional Investor country
                             ---------    ----------------------
             credit ratings.

                  The Exim Bank also rates country risk on a scale of 1
             to 8, with 1 being the best or highest rating.  The ratings
             are used to assign exposure fees to loans.  The ratings come
             from economic and political data from official government
             sources, and are shared by all U.S. agencies which loan to
             foreign borrowers.

                  The development of risk premiums for additional
             countries or revision of the recently determined country
             risk premiums will be based on average foreign currency bond
             spreads.  If there are few or no traded bonds in a
             particular country, bonds issued by countries with a similar
             Institutional Investor or Euromoney rating will be
             ----------------------    ---------
             considered.  The Eximbank or S&P/Moody's country ratings may
             also be used to develop premiums for countries with thin
             securities markets. The country hurdle rates developed by
             this methodology will be useful in screening projects.

                  When the project enters the active development stage,
             the country risk premium may be further refined by reviewing
             economic statistics and projections, the political outlook,
             and reports issued by the World Bank and CIA.  The country
             risk criteria developed by the Inter-American Investment
             Corporation may also be applied to the specific project
             profile.

                  A number of multinational financial institutions,
             export credit agencies, and commercial banks have all noted
             the umbrella or halo effect of multilateral financial
             institution participation in a project.  The country risk
             may be mitigated to a large extent by participation of
             organizations such as the following:

                  Overseas Private Investment Corporation
                  Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
                  Export-Import Bank of the U.S. or its foreign
                     counterparts
                  International Finance Corporation
                  World Bank
                  Inter-American Investment Corporation
                  Asian Development Bank

             Their involvement may include project lending, insurance for
             project equity or debt, and minority equity participation in
             a project.  In such cases the country risk premium may be
             reduced to reflect the lower risk level.

                  Another means of reducing the country risk is to form
             joint ventures with local partners  with political
             connections or economic influence, foreign partners with
             strength in the host country, or with the host government or
             its agencies.  For example, a Singapore government company
             would be an excellent partner for a project in China.  Again
             the country risk premium may be reduced in situations where
             the partner provides protection from adverse government
             actions.  Sovereign government foreign exchange or other
             guarantees of specific agreements serve to mitigate country
             risk, which will have a positive impact on the assessment of
             the risk premium.

                       3.   Construction Risk

                  The construction risk may differ significantly from the
             operating risk of a project once it is on stream.  The focus
             should be on the ability of the sponsors and management to
             effectively implement the project within budget and without
             unnecessary delays and technical/engineering risks.  There
             should be availability of sufficient resources and
             completion guarantees to overcome unforeseen overruns. 
             Important issues are the capacity of the project management
             team to implement the project and  that the systems in place
             to monitor project planning, budget and resource allocation. 
             Lack of adequate systems is likely to indicate that
             insufficient controls are in place to ensure timely
             implementation within budget.

                  The total value of the project in relation to the size
             of the sponsor should be considered.  The larger the project
             in relation to the sponsor, the higher the risk; since the
             sponsor may not have the capacity to implement such a large
             project.  The longer the time required for project
             completion, the higher the risk of problems arising in the
             construction phase.

                  Expansion projects enlarge the pre-existing capacity of
             companies, while greenfield projects establish production at
             undeveloped sites and in the form of new companies. 
             Expansion projects are generally lower risk because a track
             record exists and experienced management is available.

                  The availability of completion guarantees from project
             sponsors or suppliers will reduce implementation risk.  the
             financial standing of the provider of the guarantees should
             be evaluated.  The  financial standing and technical
             competence of the engineering, construction and equipment
             suppliers should be closely examined.

                  A project that is adequately funded will minimize the
             risk of it not being completed.  Of particular importance
             will be the availability of equity resources that are
             considered sufficient to provide the company with a sound
             capitalization and financial structure.  Higher leverage
             indicates higher risk since fixed charges related to debt
             may overburden the company.  A long-term debt to equity
             above 2.0 correlates to high risk, while a ratio below 1
             correlates to low risk.  Liquidity is a firm's ability to
             meet maturing short-term obligations, and is often measured
             by the current ratio.  A current ratio of 1:1 or less
             indicates high risk.  During the implementation stage, the
             current ratio may be less than 1.  The project must have all
             the necessary financing commitments in place to cover
             possible project overruns in project cost or shortfalls in
             other elements of the project plan.

                  The particular way in which the debt instruments are
             structured and negotiated, as well as the terms and
             conditions can either increase or decrease the financial
             risk to the company or the party that implements the
             project.  Any collateral or assets pledged to the banks
             reduces financial flexibility.

                  The local legal counsel must review the adequacy of
             titles to properties, rights of way, environmental
             regulations, supply or distribution contracts, rights of the
             company that may be contested in court,  potential product
             or other liabilities  and matters that relate to the
             compliance of the laws  of the host country with respect to
             the implementation of the project.

                  While there is no empirical evidence to calculate an
             exact risk premium, most developers and financial
             institutions recognize the additional risks associated with
             the construction period and recommend a higher hurdle rate.

                       4.   Development Risk

                  The uncertainties are greatest in the development phase
             of the project.  As the project proceeds, additional costs
             and risks are identified.  There is the possibility of long
             delays due to negotiations with the following:

                       Host government, municipalities, and state and
                          local governments
                       Environmental agencies and activists
                       Local land owners and right of way holders
                       U.S. government and its agencies such as FERC and
                          SEC
                       Commercial and multilateral financial and
                          insurance institutions
                       Equity partners
                       Energy suppliers and energy purchasers
                       Engineers, construction firms and equipment
                          vendors.

             As the time increases, the costs escalate for legal and tax
             services, financial advisory assistance and development
             efforts.  New political and economic developments may impact
             the project, and create additional uncertainty risk.

                  While there is no empirical evidence available to
             quantify the development risk, a number of independent power
             producer ("IPP") developers add a premium to the hurdle rate
             to cover the uncertainty during the development period.  In
             countries with established IPP markets or where there has
             been successful investment in similar projects, a minimum
             "development premium" should be estimated and added.   Where
             no market exists or there is no experience with similar
             projects, the development premium should be higher than the
             minimum level.

                       5.   Technical Risk

                  Technical risk includes engineering design errors,
             defects in material and workmanship, faulty production
             planning, manufacturing and scheduling problems,  omission
             of necessary equipment, and inability of the equipment to
             meet the minimum performance and availability levels. 
             Improper maintenance and operation procedures can also lead
             to equipment breakdowns, industrial accidents and lost
             revenues.

                  The technical complexity and fuel risk of the project
             are also important considerations.  The following project
             types are ranked in order of increasing technical risk:

                       Gas turbine power plants
                       Pulverized coal fired power plants
                       Coal fired or coal fluid bed
                       Waste fuels
                       Geothermal with field risk

                  Some risk mitigation is achieved by careful negotiation
             of vendor contracts.  There should be bid bonds, performance
             guarantees with liquidated damages, equipment warranties and
             retentions.

                  The appropriate premium for technical risk is somewhat
             subjective.  For CNG International projects, a premium in
             the range of 1% to 2% may be added for more technically
             difficult projects such as coal fired power plants or coal
             fluid bed power plants.  A "technology premium" is also
             appropriate for more complex or newer technology for
             pipeline or gas projects.  The premium applies to operating,
             construction and development stage projects.








                                                             EXHIBIT F


                   [Letterhead of CNG International Corporation]



                                                 September 13, 1996


             Securities and Exchange Commission
             450 Fifth Street, N.W.
             Washington, D.C.  20549

                         Re:Consolidated Natural Gas Company, et al.
                            SEC File Number 70-8759

             Dear Madams and Sirs:

                   The following opinion is rendered in accordance with
             the requirements of Exhibit F to Form U-1 under the Public
             Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (the "Act") with respect
             to the transactions proposed ("Proposed Transactions") by
             Consolidated Natural Gas Company ("Consolidated") in Post-
             Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") to the Application-
             Declaration at SEC File No. 70-8759, as amended
             ("Application").  An order dated May 30, 1996, HCAR No.
             26523, was issued purusant to the Application which
             authorized Consolidated to finance a new subsidiary, CNG
             International Corporation ("CNG International"), through
             March 31, 2001, to invest in exempt wholesale generators
             ("EWGs"), as defined in Section 32(a) of the Act, outside
             the United States and in foreign utility companies
             ("FUCOs"), as defined in Section 33(a) of the Act, and
             Intermediate Companies (as defined) relating to EWGs and
             FUCOs.    

                   Authority is requested in the Amendment for CNG
             International to obtain for investments in Foreign Energy
             Activities (as defined), through March 31, 2001, up to
             $300,000,000 through (i) the sale of shares of its common
             stock, $10,000 par value per share, to Consolidated, (ii)
             open account advances from Consolidated, or (iii) long-term
             loans from Consolidated, and any combination thereof.  The
             Amendment also requests authority for Consolidated, either
             directly or indirectly through CNG International and its
             subsidiaries, to enter into credit support arrangements with
             respect to foreign energy transactions.

                   I have examined the certificates of incorporation and
             bylaws of Consolidated and CNG International; corporate
             actions of Consolidated and CNG International relating to
             the Proposed Transactions; the Application and Amendment;
             and such other documents, records, laws and other matters as
             I deemed relevant and necessary for the purposes of this
             opinion.

                   Based on such examination and relying thereon, I am of
             the opinion that when the Commission shall have permitted
             the Amendment to become effective, all requisite action will
             have been taken by Consolidated with respect to the Proposed
             Transactions, except the actual carrying out thereof.

                   In the event the Proposed Transactions are consummated
             in accordance with the Amendment, I am of the opinion that:

                   (a)   No state commission has jurisdiction of the 
                         proposed transactions;

                   (b)   All state laws applicable to the Proposed
                         Transactions will have been complied with;
                         
                   (c)   Consolidated will legally acquire the
                         capital stock of, and interests in open account
                         advances and long-term loans to, CNG
                         International as described in the Amendment;
                         
                    (d)   The guarantees and other credit support
                          arrangements of Consolidated will be valid and
                          binding obligations of the Consolidated; and 
                    
                    (e)   The consummation of the Proposed 
                          Transactions will not violate the legal rights
                          of the holders of any securities issued by
                          Consolidated or any associate company thereof.

                   I hereby consent to the use of this opinion in
             connection with said filing.

                                                 Very truly yours,

						 /s/ N. F. Chandler
						 ------------------- 	
                                                 N. F. Chandler
                                                 Attorney




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission