Filed by Consolidated Papers, Inc.
Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14-a-12
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Subject Company: Consolidated Papers, Inc.
Commission File No.: 001-11359
[Interview with George W. Mead, Chairman of Consolidated Papers, Inc.
posted on Stora Enso's website]
These materials contain certain statements that are neither reported financial
results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions of the U.S. federal
securities laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in the forward-looking statements. Many of these risks and
uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond the companies ability to control
or estimate precisely, such as future market conditions, currency fluctuations,
the behavior of other market participants and the actions of governmental
regulators. These and other risk factors are detailed in Consolidated Papers'
SEC reports. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of these materials.
Consolidated Papers does not undertake any obligations to publicly release any
revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of these materials.
Investors and security holders are advised to read the proxy
statement/prospectus regarding the business combination transaction between
Stora Enso and Consolidated Papers, when it becomes available, because it will
contain important information. The proxy statement/prospectus will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission by Stora Enso and Consolidated Papers.
Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the proxy
statement/prospectus (when available) and other related documents filed by Stora
Enso and Consolidated Papers at the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. When
available, the proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents may also be
obtained from Consolidated Papers by contacting Consolidated Papers, Attn: Tim
Laatsch, Corporate Communications, 231 First Avenue North, Wisconsin Rapids,
Wisconsin, 52295-8050 and/or Stora Enso, Attn: Maija Harso, Investor Relations,
Kahavaranta 1, P.O. Box 309, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland.
<PAGE>
Consolidated Papers, its directors, executive officers and certain other members
of Consolidated Papers management and employees may be soliciting proxies from
Consolidated Papers shareholders in favor of the merger. Information concerning
the participants will be set forth in the proxy statement/prospectus when it is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For Additional Information:
Jukka Harmala, CEO of Stora Enso, tel. +358 2046 21404
Esko Makelainen, SEVP, Accounting and Legal Affairs, tel. +358 2046 21450
Ingvar Peterson, SEVP, Chief Financial Officer, tel. +46 8 613 6600
Scott Deitz, Director of Public Affairs, tel. +715 422 1521
www.storaenso.com
www.storaenso.com/investors
www.consolidatedpapers.com
<PAGE>
What does Consolidated gain by combining with Stora Enso? What are the strengths
of the newly formed company?
Consolidated Papers' Board of Directors initiated a detailed analysis of the
various options available to the Company in October of 1999. The Board
concluded that, ideally, the Company should join with a large and focused
company in order to get maximum value from the assets and the resources of
Consolidated. Clearly Stora Enso meets these criteria. Stora Enso had
decided that they needed to acquire a platform to build on in order to enter
the North American printing paper market. Consolidated Papers clearly
furnished an excellent platform for that purpose. On the other hand, Stora
Enso is a large, global and skillful paper company. Bringing these skills to
bear on Consolidated will be good for both.
You were actively looking for a partner yourself. Were there any other notable
candidates and why did you decide on Stora Enso?
I can't comment at this time on the merger process. Our Board believed that
Stora Enso presented the best opportunity for Consolidated and its
shareholders.
We have seen in the news that your employees are worried about their future and
their jobs because of the acquisition. What has your response to them been?
As usual, the news media seek out bad news if possible. Our response has
been that Stora Enso has stated that they have purchased Consolidated Papers
as a "platform" to build on in order to enter the North American printing
paper market. Nevertheless, we point out, that all such decisions after
closing the sale will be up to Stora Enso.
Can we expect production enhancement operations at your mills? If so, what will
they be? Will there be changes in your current product range?
These decisions will be entirely up to Stora Enso. The combination of our
two organizations should bring opportunities for improvement.
Does Consolidated Papers have previous experience of acquisitions?
Yes, we have made two acquisitions in the last five years. The first in 1995
was the two printing paper mills of Pentair, Niagara, an LWC mill in
northern Wisconsin, and LSPI, a supercalender mill in Duluth, Minnesota.
Within that acquisition we also acquired a recycled pulp facility. Our
second acquisition, 1997, was of the Kimberly mill of Repap, now Inter Lake
Papers (ILP).
<PAGE>
Do you believe that two different corporate cultures can easily be merged? Do
you see any differences between Nordic and American corporate cultures and
management styles? What can we learn from each other?
To me this is one of the major advantages of the merger in general. While
corporate cultures cannot be easily merged if they are very different, I do
not sense that our two organizations do have major differences. As I stated
in the press conference in Helsinki on February 22, Scandinavian countries
have historically had to look beyond their country borders for marketing
their products as drawn from their native resources. This is especially true
with forest products. Thus Stora Enso brings to Consolidated the global
perspective that we were looking for. At the same time, Consolidated Papers
has longstanding, mutually supportive relationships with a majority of the
major printing paper customers in North America. I personally believe that
the blending of our slightly different cultures will bring out strengths
greater than either organization had individually.
Forest company shares have higher valuations in the U.S. than for example in
Finland. What do you see as the reason for the difference? Will it disappear?
I can make two general statements regarding valuations that appear to apply
today: U.S. companies in many industries trade at higher valuations than
foreign companies and larger companies trade at higher valuations than
smaller companies. On the other hand the relative valuation of Stora Enso
has in recent time improved relative to the U.S. paper industry and the
difference today is slight. Obviously, I have no idea whether it will
disappear any more than I can predict anything else about the stock market.
Your assessment of the future of North American forestry companies; will the
industry continue to consolidate, will the number of companies drop, will some
players give up the fight?
Yes, consolidation will continue and therefore the number of companies will
drop. I have no idea whether some players will give up the fight, but our
past experience is that paper mills rarely die, they just change owners.
