CONSOLIDATED PAPERS INC
425, 2000-06-14
PAPER MILLS
Previous: COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP, 10-K, EX-27, 2000-06-14
Next: CPI CORP, SC 13G/A, 2000-06-14



                                              Filed by Consolidated Papers, Inc.
                                       Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
                           Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14-a-12
                                          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                                      Subject Company: Consolidated Papers, Inc.
                                                  Commission File No.: 001-11359

           [Buck Evan's Address to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
                              June 14, 2000]


                               SHAREHOLDER MEETING
                                  June 14, 2000

Good afternoon  ladies and  gentlemen,  and welcome to the 96th and probably our
last, Consolidated Papers Annual Shareholder Meeting.



In  preparing  my remarks  for today,  I felt a strong  temptation  to trace the
history of this company. To talk about the success,  the progress,  we've shared
over the years.

Then I thought about you: Consolidated's retirees, employees,  shareholders, and
board members. You and those before you, who represent the strength, the growth,
and the very lifeblood of this fine company.  You're the people who have written
the history of  Consolidated  Papers.  Now you're the same people looking to the
future of this company.

While tracing the business history of Consolidated may be interesting;  it's not
the history that we will dwell upon. It's the recent past, the present,  and the
future we will address today.

First,  let's  review  1999 to put  the  current  direction  of our  company  in
perspective.

The strength of our domestic  economy (once again) worked for and against us, in
1999.  Consumption  of coated  printing  papers and packaging  papers  increased
throughout  the year as the United States  economy  hummed  along.  And yet, our
sales were down 8 percent compared with record sales of 1998.



Foreign  paper came to our shores in  abundance  last year.  And by the way,  it
continues  unabated today. So much so that increased  demand,  the new business,
created by the robust economy,  was and is supplied by imports.  On top of that,
foreign  paper  has  even  taken  away  some  of the  domestic  producers'  long
established business.

The dollar was strong compared with foreign currencies,  especially the Japanese
yen and Korean won. American papermakers,  Consolidated included,  lost domestic
market share to foreign competition.



Here's  an  example:  Through  the 1970s and 80s,  Consolidated  Papers  was the
dominant coated paper supplier in southern California.  Our market share of free
sheet coated  grades  (grades we produce  here in Wisconsin  Rapids) was over 20
percent.  Today,  we estimate  that  Japanese,  Korean and other  foreign  paper
manufacturers have 85 percent of the coated paper market in Southern California.
Consolidated,  Mead, SAPPI, Potlatch, Champion, and the other domestics are left
to divide up the remaining 15 percent.  Why? Because, we cannot compete with the
Asian  papermakers  on our West Coast.  Our delivered  cost in 1999 and today is
often  higher  than the  purchase  price of paper  coming  ashore from Japan and
Korea.

Total  sales  slipped 8 percent  in 1999,  and our  earnings  fell to 73 cents a
share, which is a significant  decline from $1.13 per share in 1998 and $1.37 in
1997.

With  declining  market  share and  earnings,  it was  clear in 1999 that  North
America's  largest and most successful coated paper  manufacturer,  Consolidated
Papers,  was heading down a dark and dangerous  path if we didn't take immediate
action--action  to reverse the trend of rising costs, to increase  productivity,
to improve product quality,  and to increase sales.  Your management team worked
diligently  throughout  the past several years to identify the problems and seek
out opportunities. To solve the problems / and capitalize on the opportunities.

We began by selling off a non-core  asset,  Castle Rock  Container  Company.  We
permanently  removed a  30,000-tons  per year low profit margin paper machine at
Niagara. Across the company, our permanent, full-time employee number dropped by
462 people.

We imposed tight capital budget constraints.

Looking ahead for a moment, in 2000, our capital budget is $106-million dollars,
a 36 percent reduction  compared to 1999 / and  approximately  $75-million below
book depreciation.

We can and we will accomplish the objective of reducing our business costs.  Our
commitment to shareholders  remains--to spend only on essentials:  projects that
improve quality and improve sales; equipment replacement to maintain efficiency;
projects  promising a return  greater than the cost of capital;  and, of course,
safety programs and environmental projects.

We shaped and formed all of our actions within the framework of a Business Plan.
You may recall we introduced this plan to you at our annual meeting last year.



The  plan  was  designed  to  guide  us;  give  us  a  roadmap  toward  improved
efficiencies;  better asset  utilization and  conservation;  reduced costs;  and
improved customer, employee, shareholder, and community relations.

The Business Plan challenged us to improve the company's  financial results.  In
1999, we introduced CVA (Consolidated Value Added), to all management employees.
CVA,  you'll recall,  helps bring together our vision,  strategy,  process,  and
people,  to  focus  on  improving  our  financial   performance--return  on  the
investment. CVA is pointing us in the right direction--value creation.

Beginning  January 1 of this year, the old  Consolidated  incentive  program was
replaced with CVA.

You'll  recall,  a specific  Business Plan  objective,  aligned with CVA, was to
reduce costs by 100-million dollars over 1999 and 2000.

In 1999, we reduced our business  costs by  $38,023,000  and through May of this
year, we've reduced costs an additional $22-million for a total of $60,000,000.

We still have 40-million dollars to go, and I can assure you we will achieve our
goal, by continued manufacturing  efficiencies,  purchasing policy and procedure
changes, reorganization, and when appropriate, outsourcing.

Employee  relations  was another area we  identified  as an area of concern.  By
empowering our employees,  attacking pockets of bureaucracy,  removing redundant
layers of management, improving communications, and listening to and considering
new ideas, we have been and will continue streamlining our organization.

At times, progress has been slow, but there is quantifiable progress being made.



It should be mentioned too that since the spring of 1999, your labor  management
teams and labor  leaders  have worked long and hard to reach fair and  equitable
long-term labor contracts.  We have 6-year contracts in place with PACE,  OPEIU,
IBEW,  UAJ, and HEREIU and I'm very  pleased to announce  that the IAM 655 local
will be  voting  tomorrow  on a  contract  that  has full  bargaining  committee
support.


[PAUSE]

On the sales side of our business, sales began improving in the third quarter of
1999. In some segments,  notably  publication and specialty papers,  improvement
continues  today.  The gains  are  driven in part by the  strong  United  States
economy; only modest foreign competition in these grades; and Consolidated's new
direction,  new programs, new products, and increased promotion.  Unfortunately,
coated free sheet grades,  like those made in the Rapids  Division and converted
into sheets, are still experiencing softer demand.

Our Information  Technology strategic plan is well along the road to completion.
E-commerce is just around the corner.

Y2K came and went without a glitch thanks to the teamwork and  dedication of the
people who worked on the remediation  project.  And let's not forget most of the
18-million  dollar  cost was money  that  would have found its way to the bottom
line if January 1, 2000 had not been an extraordinary event.

In many ways, 1999 was a successful year; a year of new  initiatives;  a year of
management rededication;  a turning point. A year of transition:  new customers;
manufacturing improvements;  technical breakthroughs;  new products,  heightened
staff  efficiencies--thousands  of loyal employees  sharply focused on improving
our business.

All of this,  because over the past several  years,  it has become  increasingly
apparent that Consolidated  Papers is on the cusp, whether struggling to compete
against  advantaged  foreign paper  producers,  or much larger fully  integrated
domestic  companies,  yes, the company and the industry  have reached a critical
juncture--a  crossroads requiring that we change. Change as an industry and as a
company.

Please  understand  this,  Consolidated  Papers,  if we are to  continue to be a
successful company, a viable employer, must remain a very important part of this
changing industry. An industry undergoing consolidation.  An industry focused on
globalization. An industry soon to be dominated by a few large corporations.

The paper industry of North America has been in a ten-year  slump--earning  less
than the cost of  capital--unable  to generate the capital required to stay in a
high-stakes  game. A game that now includes players from all over the world. New
paper mills with state of the art technology in places like Indonesia, Malaysia,
Finland, China, Korea, and Japan.

I know when you consider  all the facts,  you'll  agree  Consolidated  should be
merged  into  a  larger,  global  company.  / The  paper  industry  is  terribly
fragmented.  Efficiencies of scale realized by auto, chemical, steel, hotel, and
other industries can't be realized in our industry.  / With a company like Stora
Enso, we will be able to realize efficiencies unobtainable at this time.

Presently, the top 10 companies in our industry worldwide represent only 20 - 30
percent of the total market. In most other industries, the top 10 companies have
80 - 85 percent of the market. After the merger, Consolidated Papers will become
part of a top 10 company  (actually  Stora Enso is the world's largest or second
largest) depending upon who is counting.

Larger  companies  like Stora Enso have  access to lower  cost  capital.  Larger
companies can weather down cycles better.

And

The most  efficient  low-cost  producers,  and therefore most  competitive,  are
larger  companies.  Consolidated  Papers will  benefit  from Stora  Enso's size,
expertise,  and global  market  strength.  We look forward to  benchmarking  and
incorporating their best practices.

Acquired  capacity  costs  less  than  building  new  capacity,  and that  makes
Consolidated  Papers  attractive  to Stora Enso.  We bring  two-million  tons of
productive capacity to the Stora Enso family.

Fewer competitors  means smarter  competition,  and Consolidated  teamed up with
Stora Enso in North America will be a powerhouse.  Our sales people  welcome the
opportunity to represent both Consolidated Papers and Stora Enso products.

These are just a few reasons why consolidation makes sense for Consolidated.

[PAUSE]

The future looks bright for the coated paper industry, especially if you're part
of a large company with a global presence like Stora Enso.

[PAUSE]

I mentioned at the beginning of my report that this will most likely be the last
Consolidated  Papers  Annual  Meeting.  With  that in  mind--I  will  take  this
opportunity to say Ladies and Gentlemen,  members of the Board, fellow employees
and  retirees--we've  been through some really tough times together,  and now we
draw near to the transformation of a great company into an even greater company,
Stora Enso.

As we bid Consolidated  Papers  Incorporated  goodbye, we look with anticipation
toward the dawning of a new era--the new Stora Enso.

Now here's our Chairman of the Board, George Mead.

George.


<PAGE>



                        G.W. MEAD'S ADDRESS TO THE ANNUAL
                             MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                             JUNE 14, 2000 - 2 P.M.
                                WISCONSIN RAPIDS



Today is a special  occasion.  After  nearly 100 years,  it is the final  annual
shareholder  meeting for  Consolidated  Papers.  As is our  responsibility,  and
rightly so, we are here to report to you the events of the year and the economic
health and well being of our company.

But I hope you will indulge me for a bit while I talk about some other  factors.
Many of you, our  shareholders,  are attached to  Consolidated in multiple ways.
You may also be an employee,  retiree,  parent of an  employee,  supplier of raw
materials  to the  company,  customer  of ours,  community  neighbor or business
person dependent upon our economic  success for your business.  We, for the most
part,  know each other on a first-name  basis and depend upon each other in many
ways. We are not global.

Today, we must also acknowledge the contributions of the good people that led us
here and the global economic conditions that are taking us in new directions. In
a while I want to talk about our vision of the  future,  and the good people who
will take us forward.

But right now I want to recognize the vision and success of our ancestors,  both
yours and mine, who invested their working lives, their money, gave their ideas,
performed the work, manufactured the product and built the "jewel" which we will
shortly hand over to new leadership, Stora Enso.

A few years ago we celebrated the sixtieth  anniversary of our relationship with
one of our largest  accounts,  Time Inc. It was in the mid  thirties  that Peter
Massay,  George Mead, Bill Thiele, Gil Dickerman and Bert Raprager developed the
famous  Consolidated  coater which  transformed  the coated  paper  business and
became the basis for so many years of success for our  Company.  It wasn't easy,
but  it  typified   the  kind  of   hard-working   dedication   which  has  been
characteristic of Consolidated's  success over the years. The folks at Time Inc.
thought  enough of the  anniversary  to  present  us with a montage of the first
covers of many of their magazines. It hangs directly outside my office.

Why would one of our  customers  care that much?  Naturally,  we all try hard to
provide good products with a fair price in a timely manner. But there is more to
it than that. Consolidated has character. We are responsible.

Time  Inc.  is not  our  oldest  account.  But  sixty-five  years  with a  major
relationship  is indicative of our extremely  high level of mutual respect which
we share with all of our customers.

Am I saying that Consolidated is special? Yes, indeed. And Stora Enso recognizes
that.

It certainly wasn't easy to develop Consolidated's world-wide reputation.  Those
of you who are or were our employees  recognize  that. The extra time, the extra
effort were critical.  Think of all of the skills! Engineers to design and build
paper machines and dams and who saw how to improve upon them.  Operators who not
only ran and managed machinery,  but also visualized and created improvements in
products and processes.  Craftsmen who not only kept the wheels turning, but who
visualized  ways  to do  it  better.  Technicians  who  not  only  measured  and
controlled  quality,  but also  improved it.  Managers who had to combine all of
these  skills  plus  providing  the  leadership  and  working  conditions  which
encouraged truly superior performance.

We have done this within the framework of one of the toughest,  most competitive
and  cyclical  industries.  We operate in an  increasingly  complex  environment
demanding  new  skills  in  areas  such as  information  technology,  developing
personnel  and finance.  We are  dependant  upon natural  resources,  energy and
capital,  all  scarce  and  all of  which  must  be  accurately  and  creatively
allocated. A constant case of give and take.

We have been fortunate in being able to recruit the kind of talent,  the kind of
character,  which is  required  to make this  succeed.  We are  located in areas
conducive to raising families and developing good relationships.  But this, too,
does not just happen, does not come  automatically.  We have all worked, each in
our own way, to make our  communities  even better places to live.  Consolidated
has supported these endeavors, recognizing their importance.

I would like to pay my personal respects to the many mentors who helped me in my
career.  I'll mention a few: Ed Witte and Freeman Gilke,  Mickey McCourt and the
Murtfeldt  brothers,  Walter and  Stanton  Mead,  Henry  Baldwin  and Ira Boyce,
Clarence Jackson and Howard Richmond. Each a leader and a teacher. And these had
predecessors,  like those who were sent to Canada and returned:  Miller, McCourt
again,  and  Rowland.  They were  still here when I came.  Before  them were the
founders, along with our grandfather,  Jackson,  Johnson, Witter and Nash, among
others.

Our world has changed.  Our customers and our  competitors are becoming more and
more  global.  Partnering  with Stora Enso brings new assets,  new  abilities to
assist us in  competing in what is an  increasingly  difficult  and  treacherous
world.  As many  have  said to me,  the  merger  with  Stora  Enso  was not only
inevitable, but the best of all possible solutions. This gives us a solid future
in our industry, benefiting not just the shareholders, but employees, neighbors,
suppliers,  and customers. Any other route would have had greater risk. Instead,
the breadth and depth of Stora Enso will bring new and  exciting  opportunities.
Putting it simply, Stora Enso describes us as a platform. They are truly global,
with mills in Europe, Canada and China and landholdings in South America and the
Pacific basin.  They were already the largest coated paper  manufacturer  in the
world.  We can improve  world-wide  logistics and balance  orders  between paper
machines more efficiently.  We can satisfy customers who want a single source of
supply in various corners of the world.  These important  capabilities  have not
been available to us in the past.

But there is more. Our respective  skills and  technologies  have been developed
independently.  This  brings the  opportunity  to compare and  improve,  what is
referred to as  "benchmarking."  Stora Enso's size brings a broader diversity of
skills which we can utilize. They are good people, talented people. I am looking
forward to  working  with them.  I have  already  enjoyed  and  appreciated  the
interaction which is permitted to date.

You can see why I approach the future with  optimism and  enthusiasm.  With full
respect for all the many contributions of the past, we now can see our way clear
to a challenging, yet positive and exciting future.

The transaction  with Stora Enso is long and complex.  Many  regulations must be
met, many approvals obtained. We appear to be on schedule.

As you  realize,  since  collectively  we  will  be  taking  50  percent  of our
Consolidated  stock value in Stora Enso stock, it was important to us that we be
able to trade that stock easily in a United States  market.  Fortunately,  Stora
Enso had already  begun the  preliminary  work to  accomplish  this and that has
helped speed up this process.

The listing of Stora Enso stock in the form of an ADS,  or  American  Depositary
Share, the equivalent of their stock on the New York Stock Exchange,  requires a
filing with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of what is known as an "F-4"
registration  statement (show).  The substance of this document will also be the
proxy  that you will be  receiving  for our  special  shareholders'  meeting  to
consider  merging  with Stora  Enso.  It is  extremely  thorough  and  complete:
fortunately  the first ten pages provide an excellent  summary of the situation.
We hope to get approval from the Securities and Exchange  Commission in the next
few  weeks,  at which  time we can print  the  proxy  and send it out to you.  A
Shareholders' meeting will be called for about four to six weeks after the proxy
is mailed. This places the final stages of our transaction somewhere into August
or September.

We had hoped to combine  today's  shareholder  meeting  with the final one,  but
state law required  that we hold our regular  annual  meeting  before the end of
July, and it did not appear that the special meeting could be held until August,
at least. Thus two meetings.

I hope I've made it clear that your Board, our executive  management  (scattered
throughout  the room) and I are unanimous in believing that this is far and away
the best solution for the future success of what we now call  "Consolidated." Is
there sadness in a change this  dramatic,  in losing control of what in the past
we have controlled? Of course. Are there concerns as to how some individuals may
be affected?  Again, of course. But the important thing is that we move into the
future with the  confidence  that we have done the  absolute  best that could be
done in assuring a prosperous  future for our  organization  as a whole.  I know
that you will join us with the  continuing  support which we have enjoyed in the
past.





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission