<PAGE>
August 4, 2000
Dear Stockholder:
Enclosed please find the following documents:
1. A supplement to Crown's Proxy Statement, dated July 20, 2000, that was
previously transmitted to you as a Crown Stockholder relating to the
proposed merger of Crown with Rosemore Acquisition Corporation.
2. A duplicate proxy card and return envelope for your use.
3. Crown's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended on June 30,
2000.
4. Press release dated July 27, 2000, regarding Crown's second quarter
results and upcoming stockholders meeting.
3620-PI-00
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF CROWN]
SUPPLEMENT TO PROXY STATEMENT
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
One North Charles Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
August 4, 2000
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
The Board of Directors of Crown Central Petroleum Corporation ("Crown") has
scheduled a stockholders meeting for August 24, 2000, at which time you will be
asked to consider and vote on Crown's proposed merger with Rosemore Acquisition
Corporation ("RAC"), a matter of significant importance to you as a Crown
stockholder. As indicated in the proxy statement transmitted to you by Crown on
July 24, 2000, the merger would occur under the terms of an agreement between
Crown, RAC and Rosemore, Inc. ("Rosemore") and would provide Crown stockholders
with $9.50 per share for all of their Crown stock. The Rosemore merger
agreement was the result of an impartial and comprehensive process first begun
in February, 1999, when Crown engaged Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation to
explore Crown's strategic alternatives. This lengthy exploration process
resulted in only one fully financed, all cash offer--the Rosemore offer--to
acquire all of the outstanding shares of Crown. The Independent Committee of
Crown's Board of Directors unanimously approved the proposed merger between
Crown and RAC, based on its determination that the merger transaction, as
proposed, maximizes value for all Crown stockholders.
On July 17, 2000, Apex Oil Company, Inc. ("Apex") filed an amendment to its
Schedule 13D stating that it had increased its bid for Crown to $10.50 per
share of Crown common stock. The transaction proposed by Apex, however, is
subject to no less than thirteen separate financing contingencies, raising
serious questions about Apex's ability to pay $10.50 per share for all of the
Crown stock and cover other payment obligations which may arise from the
transaction.
The Independent Committee has asked Apex for evidence of financing
sufficient to permit Apex to complete its proposed transaction, and met with
P.A. Novelly, beneficial owner of Apex, on July 14, 2000 to discuss this issue.
Despite the Independent Committee's requests and its July 14th meeting with Mr.
Novelly, no indication of non-contingent financing has been provided by Apex.
The Independent Committee of Crown's Board of Directors has unanimously
reaffirmed its recommendation of the proposed merger between Crown and RAC. The
Independent Committee believes that the merger between Crown and RAC remains
fair and in the best interests of all of the stockholders of Crown,
particularly in light of the inability of Apex to provide evidence of cash
available to purchase Crown. Accordingly, the Independent Committee will
continue to work to close the merger transaction between Crown and RAC.
As discussed in the attached Proxy Supplement, the Independent Committee
believes there is a significant risk that Apex will not obtain acquisition
financing or other sources of cash sufficient to permit consummation of its
proposal. Accordingly, the Independent Committee continues to urge all
stockholders to vote in favor of the Rosemore offer. Please sign, date and mail
your WHITE proxy card at your earliest convenience.
Thank you for your interest and support.
Sincerely,
/s/ Michael F. Dacey
Michael F. Dacey
Chairman, The Independent Committee
of Crown Directors
<PAGE>
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES TODAY
If you have questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please call
toll free:
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
77 Water Street
New York, New York 10005
CALL TOLL-FREE (800) 848-3094
Investors and security holders are advised to read the proxy statement, and any
amendments or supplements thereto when they become available, because each of
these documents, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contains,
or will contain, important information.
The date of this supplement to the proxy statement is August 4, 2000, and it
is being mailed or otherwise delivered to Crown stockholders on or about such
date.
Novelly's July 25, 2000 Letter
By letter dated July 25, 2000 to Michael F. Dacey, Chairman of the
Independent Committee, Mr. P.A. Novelly took issue with the Committee's stated
reasons for not pursuing Apex's acquisition proposals and reiterated that Apex
had authorized Crown to contact its lenders, including Foothill Capital
Corporation ("Foothill"), to confirm that the Apex financing proposals were
"not conditional." Mr. Novelly's July 25, 2000 letter did not, however, explain
how it was possible to reconcile his statement that Foothill's financing
proposal, set forth in a letter dated July 12, 2000, was "not conditional"
against the multitude of conditions set forth in the Foothill letter; nor has
Mr. Novelly, to date, provided the Committee with any such explanation.
In his July 25 letter, Mr. Novelly also requested that Crown amend its
shareholder rights plan to allow Apex to make a tender offer for Crown stock at
$10.50 per share or, in the alternative, "redeem the rights issued under the
Rights Agreement so that Apex may make such a tender offer free from the rights
plan." Mr. Novelly indicated that the proposed tender offer would be subject to
the conditions that:
. the tendered shares represent not less than 20% of the aggregate voting
power of Crown stock then outstanding;
. Apex has the right to vote such shares at the upcoming special
stockholders meeting; and
. Apex receive any necessary regulatory approvals for the acquisition of
the shares.
Mr. Novelly's letter did not indicate that the proposed tender offer would
be for all of the outstanding Crown stock.
Independent Committee's Response to Novelly's July 25, 2000 Letter
On July 27, 2000, the Independent Committee met with its legal and financial
advisors and considered the letter from Mr. Novelly dated July 25. After
discussion, the Independent Committee authorized Mr. Dacey to reply to the
Novelly letter, which Mr. Dacey did by letter dated July 27, 2000. In his
letter, Mr. Dacey disputed Mr. Novelly's assertion that the evidence of
financing presented at the July 14 meeting effectively removed the financing
conditions to Apex's proposals. Mr. Dacey stated that "the letter delivered to
the Committee regarding refinancing of Crown's debt contained numerous explicit
and substantial conditions to the willingness of that lender to arrange
financing", and that "those express, written conditions cannot lightly be
dismissed or orally explained away."
<PAGE>
Mr. Dacey also indicated that the purpose of the meeting--to assess Apex's
financing contingency--was made clear to Mr. Novelly well prior to the meeting,
and that, despite this opportunity, Mr. Novelly had presented only "financing
letters full of conditions" for the Committee's consideration. Mr. Dacey also
reminded Mr. Novelly that Apex had been urged "for months" to enter into a
confidentiality agreement customary for these transactions, but had failed to
do so.
With respect to the statements regarding the tender offer for Crown shares,
Mr. Dacey related in his letter that, under the terms of Crown's merger
agreement with Rosemore, Inc. ("Rosemore") and Rosemore Acquisition Corporation
("RAC"), Crown was prohibited from amending or modifying, or proposing to amend
or modify, Crown's shareholder rights plan. Mr. Dacey did point out, however,
that if Mr. Novelly was interested in making a fair tender offer for 100% of
the Crown stock, coupled with a back-end merger, the rights plan already
contains an exemption that would permit such a transaction without amendment to
the rights plan. Mr. Dacey indicated, however, that should a tender offer for
Crown shares actually be made, the Committee would promptly consider all the
terms and conditions of such an offer and would take such action as is
appropriate regarding the rights plan for the benefit of all of Crown's
stockholders.
Apex/Golnoy Preliminary Proxy Statement
On July 31, 2000, Golnoy Barge Company, Inc. ("Golnoy") and Apex, two
entities beneficially owned by Mr. Novelly, filed a preliminary proxy statement
containing, among other things, the assertion that the Rosemore offer of $9.50
per share "offers inadequate value" to Crown's stockholders given "current
market conditions", as compared to Apex's alternative proposal of $10.50 per
share. The Committee, however, views Rosemore's $9.50 per share commitment as
the best and most likely way to maximize stockholder value. Any acquisition of
Crown by Apex could subject Crown to repayment obligations under its credit
facility with Congress Financial Corporation, its credit arrangement with
Heller Financial, and its $125 million senior note facility, among others.
Accordingly, an acquisition of Crown by Apex could result in Crown facing
immediate payment obligations in excess of $174 million. Mr. Novelly has not
provided any firm financing to cover these payment obligations following the
acquisition he proposes.
Recent Developments
Beginning in late January 2000, Gulf Coast refining margins have experienced
marked improvement as compared to the same 1999 period. For the first six
months of 2000, the Gulf Coast 20 day delayed 3/2/1 crack spread was $5.16 per
barrel compared to $2.23 per barrel for the same 1999 period. In particular,
the months of February, May and June 2000 realized significantly improved
margins as compared to the same 1999 months. As a result, Crown's estimated net
income improved from a loss of $22.9 million for the first six months of 1999
to a net income of $5.6 million for the first six months of 2000. If the
average Gulf Coast 20 day delayed 3/2/1 crack spread of $2.54 per barrel that
prevailed over the three year period from 1997 through 1999 were to have
prevailed during the first six months of 2000, Crown management estimates that
Crown would have incurred a net loss of approximately $29.6 million.
The Gulf Coast 20 day delayed 3/2/1 crack spread averaged $2.90 per barrel
in 1997, $2.00 per barrel in 1998, $2.62 per barrel in 1999, $2.54 per barrel
over the three year period of 1997 through 1999, and $2.66 per barrel over the
five year period of 1995 through 1999, compared to an average of $4.73 per
barrel for the first seven months of 2000. The Gulf Coast 20 day delayed 3/2/1
crack spread declined from $7.75 per barrel on June 30, 2000 to $1.63 per
barrel on July 31, 2000. This decline reflects the continuing volatility in the
price of crude oil and the margin available for finished petroleum products.
The daily closing spot price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil has ranged
from $33.93 per barrel on March 7, 2000, to $23.85 per barrel on April 10,
2000, to $34.75 on June 23, 2000, falling back to $27.41 on July 31, 2000.
2
<PAGE>
The futures markets trade futures margins, and many industry participants
use the futures markets to hedge anticipated futures margins. Crown and its
management are unable to predict or anticipate futures margins, but believe
that the futures markets provide the best available indicator of the margins
that will prevail in the future. The futures markets currently indicate a
market expectation that the average Gulf Coast 20 day delayed 3/2/1 crack
spread over the last five months of 2000 will be approximately $2.18 per
barrel, and over the full year 2001 will be approximately $2.90 per barrel.
There can be no assurances, however, that the actual margins over these periods
will not be higher or lower than those anticipated by the futures markets.
Crown processes a monthly average of 35,000 barrels per day of crude oil at
its Pasadena refinery under a processing agreement with Statoil Marketing and
Trading (US) Inc. Statoil owns and supplies to Crown the crude oil that Crown
processes for Statoil, and Crown returns to Statoil a specified mix of finished
petroleum products and receives a specified fee per barrel processed. The
processing agreement is scheduled to expire in October 2000. Crown does not
currently expect that the processing agreement will be renewed with Statoil.
When and if it expires, Crown will have to purchase additional crude oil to
process in place of Statoil's crude oil. At the July 31, 2000 price of West
Texas Intermediate crude oil for October 2000 delivery of $27.31 per barrel,
Crown will be required to expend up to approximately $25 million in working
capital to pay for the crude oil to process to replace the crude oil and
finished petroleum products currently owned by Statoil. In addition, Crown will
then be processing this throughput for its own account, rather than for the
account of Statoil. As a result, Crown expects that its profits would be
greater or its losses reduced if margins remain at the average levels that
prevailed during the first six months of 2000; however, Crown's profits would
be reduced or its losses increased if the margins return to the levels that
prevailed over the three year period from 1997 through 1999.
Market history over the past three years, current expectations as evidenced
by the futures markets, and the current 3/2/1 crack spread (as of July 31,
2000), would argue against using the margins experienced during the first six
months of 2000 as an indication of Crown's future performance or results of
operations.
Additional information regarding the recent financial performance of Crown
is contained in a press release issued by Crown on July 27, 2000, a copy of
which is enclosed herewith.
For Stockholders Who Have Already Voted
We have enclosed a second proxy card (and a return envelope) for your use,
in case you wish to change your vote. The proxy card requests your vote in
connection with the approval of the merger and merger agreement. If you have
already voted your proxy and you do not wish to change your vote, you do not
need to return this second proxy card.
For Stockholders Who Have Not Already Voted
Enclosed for your convenience is a duplicate proxy card (and return
envelope) for your use. You may use either the proxy card that was originally
sent to you, or you may use the second proxy card enclosed herewith. The proxy
card requests your vote in connection with the approval of the merger and
merger agreement.
Proxies and Revocation
You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to it being voted by filing a
notice of revocation with the Vice President-Secretary of Crown, Dolores B.
Rawlings, at One North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 or by a duly
executed proxy bearing a later date. A notice of revocation need not be on any
specific form. Your proxy may also be revoked by your attendance at the Special
Meeting and voting in person. Your attendance at the Special Meeting will not
by itself constitute revocation of your proxy. Your execution and return of a
proxy will not in any way affect your right to attend and to vote in person at
the Special Meeting.
3
<PAGE>
Additional Information
The proxy statement as supplemented by this supplement incorporates by
reference the information contained in Crown's (i) Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, as amended, (ii) Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, and (iii) Current Reports on Form 8-
K filed on July 18, 2000, June 22, 2000, May 2, 2000, April 10, 2000, April 3,
2000, March 31, 2000, March 17, 2000, March 13, 2000, March 10, 2000, March 7,
2000 and February 3, 2000. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 64
of the proxy statement.
4
<PAGE>
3620-PI-00
<PAGE>
[CROWN NEWS RELEASE LETTERHEAD]
Contact:
Institutional Inquiries:
JOHN E. WHEELER, JR.
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(410) 659-4803
Press/Shareholder Inquiries:
J. STEVEN WISE, Manager,
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Corporate & Government Affairs
Baltimore, Maryland-- July 27, 2000 (410) 659-4859
CROWN CENTRAL REPORTS SECOND QUARTER RESULTS
Crown Central Petroleum Corporation (CNP.A and CNP.B on the
American Stock Exchange) announced today a net profit of $9.2 million ($.93 per
share) in the second quarter of 2000, compared to a net loss of $11.0 million
($1.12 per share) in the second quarter of 1999. Sales and operating revenues
for the second quarter were $481.0 million compared to $281.4 million in the
second quarter of 1999.
For the first six months of 2000, the Company had a net profit of $5.6
million ($.57 per share) on revenues of $902.5 million, compared to a net loss
of $22.9 million ($2.32 per share) on revenues of $506.6 million during the same
period in 1999.
After adjusting the net profit for interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, abandonments and the LIFO inventory provision, the Company's cash
flow from operating activities for the second quarter 2000 was $29.4 million, up
from $6.9 million during the same period in 1999. With the Company's 35,000
barrel per day processing agreement with Statoil set to expire in October 2000,
the additional cash flow generated from operations will be needed to fund
estimated working capital requirements of approximately $27 million to enable
the Company to continue to operate its refineries at optimum capacity.
Refining margins contributed significantly to the improved results for the
period. The 20-day delayed Gulf Coast 3-2-1 benchmark increased from $2.32 per
barrel in the second quarter of 1999 to $6.23 per barrel in the second quarter
of 2000. Stocks of gasoline throughout the country were well below 1999 levels
during the period while demand remained strong, resulting in higher margins.
West Texas Intermediate crude oil averaged $28.93 per barrel for the second
quarter 2000, a 64% increase over the same period in 1999, when the average
was $17.64 per barrel.
The retail segment of the Company experienced a slight increase in gasoline
gross margins in the second quarter versus the same period last year, though
margins dropped substantially during the second half of the quarter.
<PAGE>
Gasoline volumes remained steady on a per month per store basis when compared
with the second quarter of 1999. Merchandise sales continued to increase on a
per month per store basis, improving from $37.8 thousand during the second
quarter of 1999 to $39.9 thousand for the same period in 2000.
Despite the significant improvement in refining margins during the second
quarter, in July gasoline inventories have returned to more historic average
levels. As a result, the 20-day delayed 3-2-1 crack spread has averaged $2.33
per barrel for the first 25 days of July. In addition, the currently forecasted
20-day delayed 3-2-1 margin for the remainder of 2000 is approximately $2.49 per
barrel.
Additionally, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a rule in
May requiring radical sulfur reductions in diesel fuel. This follows the EPA's
December 1999 adoption of a rule requiring drastic reductions in gasoline sulfur
levels and the implementation on June 1, 2000 of tighter specifications for
reformulated gasoline. These requirements, and the question of whether the
industry will be able to implement them in a relatively short period of time,
only add to the many challenges facing an already uncertain and volatile
industry. The Company is considering the impact of these rules on its
operations.
The Company announced on April 10, 2000 that it had entered into a
definitive merger agreement that would result in Crown becoming an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Rosemore, Inc., a Maryland corporation that owns 49%
of Crown's Class A common stock and 11% of Crown's Class B common stock. A
Special Meeting has been scheduled for August 24, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. at the Turf
Valley Conference Center in Ellicott City, Maryland for stockholders to consider
and vote upon the merger and related Agreement and Plan of Merger.
Headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland since 1930, Crown operates two
Texas refineries with a total capacity of 152,000 barrels per day, 327 Crown
gasoline stations and convenience stores in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern
U.S., and 13 product terminals along the Colonial, Plantation and Texas Eastern
Product pipelines.
<PAGE>
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
OPERATING STATISTICS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended Ytd Three Months Ended 2nd Qtr
June 30 Plan June 30 Plan
2000 1999 2000 2000 1999 2000
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COMBINED REFINERY OPERATIONS
----------------------------
Production (BPD-M) 147 136 155 155 138 159
Production (MMbbl) 26.7 24.6 28.2 14.1 12.5 14.5
Sales (MMbbl) 26.1 21.4 28.2 13.6 13.0 14.5
Gross Margin ($/bbl) 4.36 2.76 2.30 4.33 2.55 2.10
Gross Profits ($MM) 113.8 58.9 64.9 58.9 33.2 30.4
Operating Cost ($/bbl) (2.59) (3.01) (2.45) (2.68) (2.61) (2.40)
Operating Cost ($MM) (67.6) (64.4) (69.1) (36.4) (34.0) (34.8)
Refining Operating Profit (Loss)($MM) 46.2 (5.5) (4.2) 22.5 (0.8) (4.4)
RETAIL
------
Total Stores 327 348 332 327 348 332
Volume (pmps -Mgal) 119 118 121 120 120 126
Volume (MMgal) 233 247 241 118 125 126
Gasoline Gross Margin ($/gal) 0.093 0.092 0.097 0.103 0.098 0.095
Gasoline Gross Profit ($MM) 21.6 22.8 23.5 12.2 12.3 12.0
Company-Operated Stores 225 244 232 225 244 232
Merchandise Sales (pmps - $M) 37.6 35.6 36.8 39.9 37.8 39.8
Merchandise Sales ($MM) 50.8 52.1 51.2 36.9 27.7 27.7
Merchandise Gross Margin (%) 31.7 30.7 30.5 32.0 30.7 30.7
Merchandise Gross Profit ($MM) 16.1 16.0 15.6 8.6 8.5 8.5
Ancillary Income, Net ($MM) 6.2 7.1 6.3 3.0 3.7 3.2
Retail Gross Profit ($MM) 43.9 45.9 45.4 23.8 24.5 23.7
Retail Operating Costs (pmps -$M) (20.3) (21.0) (20.3) (20.1) (20.6) (20.5)
Retail Operating Costs ($MM) (39.9) (43.9) (40.4) (19.7) (21.5) (20.4)
Retail Non-Operating (Expense) Income ($MM) (0.1) 0.4 1.0 (0.4) 0.7 1.0
Retail Operating Profit (Loss)($MM) 3.9 2.4 6.0 3.7 3.7 4.3
WHOLESALE/TERMINAL
OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS)($MM) 14.0 6.9 0.5 3.2 2.1 (0.2)
OTHER
-----
LIFO (Provision) Recovery ($MM) (30.3) (21.5) (1.1) (2.9) (12.3) 9.8
Corporate Overhead ($MM) (12.6) (12.3) (13.0) (6.0) (5.9) (6.4)
Net Interest (Expense)($MM) (8.2) (6.9) (8.5) (4.1) (3.5) (4.2)
Other (Expense) Income ($MM) (3.8) 1.2 0.0 (3.9) (0.5) 0.0
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit ($MM) (3.6) 12.8 0.6 (3.3) 6.2 (0.2)
Total Net Income (Loss)($MM) 5.6 (22.9) (19.7) 9.2 (11.0) (1.3)
Depreciation & Amortization ($MM) 19.3 17.9 17.9 9.7 9.1 9.1
Net Interest Expense ($MM) 8.2 6.9 8.5 4.1 3.5 4.2
LIFO Provision (Recovery) ($MM) 30.3 21.5 1.1 2.9 12.3 (9.8)
(Gain) Loss from Asset Disposals ($MM) (0.4) (0.4) (1.0) 0.2 (0.8) (1.0)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) ($MM) 3.6 (12.8) (0.6) 3.3 (6.2) 0.2
EBITDAAL ($MM) 66.6 10.2 6.2 29.4 6.9 1.4
Capital Expenditures ($MM) 8.1 12.9 18.1 3.3 4.3 7.5
</TABLE>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPD = Barrels per day
bbl = barrel or barrels as applicable
gal = gallon or gallons as applicable
pmps = per month per store
M = in thousands
MM = in millions
Note: Merchandise sales consist of sales generated by Company-operated stores,
therefore, the per month per store (pmps) amounts are calculated using
Company-operated stores only.
<PAGE>
Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
June 30 June 30
2000 1999 2000 1999
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and operating revenues $ 902,533 $ 506,578 $ 481,049 $ 281,413
Income (loss) before income
taxes 9,210 (35,621) 12,486 (17,271)
Net income (loss) 5,650 (22,859) 9,213 (11,029)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic $ 0.57 $ (2.32) $ 0.93 $ (1.12)
Diluted 0.56 (2.32) 0.92 (1.12)
Weighted average shares used
in the computation of net
income (loss) per share:
Basic 9,871,431 9,871,431 9,871,431 9,871,431
Diluted 10,000,859 9,871,431 9,993,647 9,871,431
</TABLE>
