CENTRAL & SOUTH WEST SERVICES INC
35-CERT, 2000-08-28
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: FIDELITY CONTRAFUND, NSAR-A, EX-99, 2000-08-28
Next: SMTEK INTERNATIONAL INC, 10-K, 2000-08-28







                                  UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549




PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935
File No.  70-6802
Report Date:  April 1, 2000 through June 30, 2000


In the matter of:
Central and South West Services, Inc.



I.  CONSTRUCTION AND FUEL PROJECTS

Central and South West  Corporation  (CSW) is a public utility  holding  company
with four  electric  operating  subsidiaries:  Central  Power and Light  Company
(CPL);  Public Service  Company of Oklahoma (PSO);  Southwestern  Electric Power
Company (SWP) and West Texas  Utilities  Company  (WTU).  Central and South West
Services,  Inc. (CSWS) performs at cost,  accounting,  engineering,  tax, legal,
financial,  marketing,  fuel planning,  electronic data processing,  centralized
economic  dispatching  of  electric  power  and other  services  for CSW and its
subsidiaries.  CSWS  is  required  to file  quarterly  reports  concerning:  (a)
description  of  activities  for  each  construction   project;  (b)  method  of
accounting  for  each  project;   (c)  information  on  fuel  projects  and  (d)
information on the project billing allocations.

(A)  METHOD OF ACCOUNTING

The cost of materials,  labor, outside services and other expenditures  directly
attributable to construction of the jointly-owned  projects are paid by CSWS and
SWP as agents  for the  participating  companies.  Controlled-disbursement  bank
accounts  for  each  project  and the  CSW  money  pool  facilitate  funding  of
construction  checks.  Each company must provide  financing for its share of the
construction costs.

A summary  statement  of  activity  is  provided  monthly by CSWS and SWP to the
participating  companies.  A series of service ID's and account  numbers enables
the  participating  companies to record  their  respective  ownership  shares of
construction  work in progress,  retentions  payable,  accrued sales tax, vendor
accounts payable and cash paid.

(B)  CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

COLETO CREEK UNIT  #2

This project has been suspended. Accordingly, no new construction or engineering
activities  occurred on this project  during the quarter.  CSWS is continuing to
provide  contract  administration,  including  contract  suspension  costs,  and
maintenance of  environmental  permits during the project's  dormant period.  No
costs were incurred this quarter.

WALKER COUNTY UNIT #1

This project has been suspended. Accordingly, no new construction or engineering
activities  occurred on this project during the quarter.  No costs were incurred
this quarter.


EXPENDITURES BY PROJECT :
(thousands)
                                      COLETO             WALKER
                                      CREEK              COUNTY
QUARTER ENDED June  30, 2000

CPL                                    $ --               $ --

PSO                                      --                 --

SWP                                      --                 --

WTU                                      --                 --

TOTAL                                  $ --               $ --


EXPENDITURES BY PROJECT :
(thousands)

                                     COLETO             WALKER
                                      CREEK             COUNTY
SIX  MONTHS ENDED June  30, 2000

CPL                                   $ --               $ --

PSO                                     --                 --

SWP                                     --                 --

WTU                                     --                 --

TOTAL                                 $ --               $ --


(C)  FUEL PROJECTS

SOUTH  HALLSVILLE:  Work on this project  consisted of overseeing  the contract
------------------
miner's reclamation  activities.  Land and lignite lease maintenance  comprised
the majority of the work on this project.

DOLET  HILLS:  Land and lignite  lease  maintenance  as well as advance  royalty
payments comprised the majority of the work on this project. The property is now
in production and advanced royalty payments are being recouped.


(D)  BASIS FOR PROJECT BILLING ALLOCATIONS

SWP PROJECTS:

                                     SOUTH          DOLET
OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE              HALLSVILLE        HILLS

SWP                                 85.936%        46.094%

NON-AFFILIATED ENTITIES             14.064%        53.906%

TOTAL                              100.000%        100.000%

The South  Hallsville  project and the Dolet Hills project are in the production
stage.


ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL ACTIVITIES:

Administrative and general activities included continuing  maintenance of a Land
Management  System.  Expenditures  for  these  activities,   along  with  legal,
accounting,  procurement,  employee relations, treasury and information services
were $ 66,244 for the second quarter.


EXPENDITURES BY PROJECT:
(thousands)

QUARTER ENDED           SOUTH      DOLET
June  30, 2000        HALLSVILLE   HILLS
                         (1)        (1)

CPL                      $ --       $ --

PSO                        --         --

SWP                       172          4

WTU                        --         --

TOTAL                    $172       $  4


(1)  Excludes non-affiliated interests in these projects.



SIX MONTHS ENDED        SOUTH      DOLET
June 30, 2000         HALLSVILLE   HILLS
                         (1)        (1)

CPL                     $ --       $ --

PSO                       --         --

SWP                      1,934      518

WTU                       --         --

TOTAL                   $1,934     $518

(1)   Excludes non-affiliated interests in these projects.




                           QUARTER ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                           JUNE 30, 2000       JUNE 30, 2000
                         BUDGET     ACTUAL    BUDGET    ACTUAL

SOUTH HALLSVILLE  (1)      $ 72      $ 172     $ 115    $1,934

DOLET HILLS (1)              28          4       933       518

TOTAL                     $ 100      $ 176    $ 1048   $ 2,452

(1)  Excludes non-affiliated interests in these projects.


                                      SINCE
CUMULATIVE  EXPENDITURES        JANUARY 1, 1984
(thousands)

SOUTH HALLSVILLE (1)              $ 36,796

DOLET HILLS (1)                     12,204

ABANDONED PROJECTS                  24,101

TOTAL                             $ 73,101

(1)  Excludes non-affiliated interests in these projects.


II.  FUEL PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES


                                           CONTRACT
                       TOTAL      TOTAL     MINER'S    TOTAL
                        TONS       TONS    DELIVERED  COST OF
                      PRODUCED   SHIPPED   COST/TON  FUEL/TON
                                                        (3)
QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000

SOUTH HALLSVILLE  (1)   398,013    375,966    $25.57    $32.58

DOLET HILLS  (2)        338,634    304,571    $17.45    $17.91


SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000

SOUTH HALLSVILLE  (1) 1,239,111  1,208,883    $18.40    $22.11

DOLET HILLS  (2)        583,926    558,498    $18.65    $19.88

The above amounts exclude non-affiliated interests in these projects.


(1) Lignite reserves are owned and controlled by SWP,  Oklahoma  Municipal Power
Authority  (OMPA) and Northeast Texas Electric  Cooperative  (NTEC) and mined by
Sabine  Mining  Company.  All tonnage was delivered to the Henry W. Pirkey Power
Plant which is also owned by SWP,  OMPA, and NTEC. The total cost of fuel is the
sum of the contract miner's delivered cost, lease maintenance and royalty costs,
overhead costs and amortization costs.

(2) Lignite reserves are owned and controlled by SWP, Central Louisiana Electric
Company,  Inc. (CLECO) and OMPA. NTEC acquires its ownership share from SWP once
the  lignite is  delivered  to the plant.  The  lignite is mined by Dolet  Hills
Mining  Venture.  All tonnage was delivered to the Dolet Hills Power Plant which
is owned by SWP, CLECO,  OMPA and NTEC. The total cost of fuel is the sum of the
miner's delivered cost, lease maintenance and royalty costs,  overhead costs and
amortization costs.

(3) The cost per ton is  estimated  each month and then  adjusted to actual cost
the following month.


III.  OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES

CPL  incurred  no  expenditures  related to the  operation  and  development  of
existing leases in south Texas.


                                    SIGNATURE

As requested by order of the Securities and Exchange  Commission pursuant to the
Public  Utility  Holding  Company Act of 1935,  Central and South West Services,
Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on the 28th day of August, 2000.




                         By:  /s/ A. A. Pena
                                   A. A. Pena
                                    Treasurer





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission