DDL ELECTRONICS INC
10-K, 1995-09-29
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS
Previous: DANIEL INDUSTRIES INC, S-8, 1995-09-29
Next: DAILY MONEY FUND/MA/, 485APOS, 1995-09-29



                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C.  20549

                                 FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
     [X]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
          OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

                  For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1995

                                    OR

     [   ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) 
          OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

          For the transition period from _________ to __________

                       Commission File Number 1-8101

                           DDL ELECTRONICS, INC.

          (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

          Delaware                          33-0213512
(State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)          Identification No.)

       7320 SW Hunziker Rd., Suite 300, Tigard, Oregon 97223-2302
                 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

            Registrant's telephone number, including area code
                              (503) 620-1789

      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

    Title of each class             Name of each exchange on
                                     which registered

    Common Stock, .01 Par Value       New York Stock Exchange
                                       Pacific Stock Exchange

    7% Convertible Subordinated 
     Debentures due May 15, 2001         New York Stock Exchange

    8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated 
     Debentures due August 1, 2008       New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   X      No      

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge,
in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 
[   ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange on September 15, 1995:  
$34,637,179  

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of September 15, 1995:  16,299,849  

                    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended June
30, 1995, is incorporated by reference in Part I and II hereof. 
The Proxy Statement for the December 11, 1995 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders is incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

                               EXHIBIT INDEX
                               See page 24

<PAGE>
                            PART I


Item 1.   Business

    DDL Electronics, Inc. ("DDL" or the "Company") is an
independent provider of electronic contract manufacturing ("ECM")
services and a fabricator of printed circuit boards ("PCB") for
use primarily in the computer, communications, and
instrumentation industries.  The Company provides ECM services
for manufacturers of electronic equipment and fabricates
multilayer PCBs at its operations in Northern Ireland primarily
for customers in Europe.  

    The Company entered the ECM business by acquiring its
domestic ECM operations in 1985 and by organizing its European
ECM operations in 1990.  In its PCB fabrication business, the
Company manufactures PCBs ranging from simple single and
double-sided boards to multilayer boards with more than 20
layers.  Since the mid-1980s, the Company has increasingly
focused on the fabrication of advanced multilayer PCBs. 
Management believes the market for these boards offers the
opportunity for more attractive margins than the market for less
complex, single and double-sided boards.  Since 1985, the Company
has made substantial capital expenditures in its Northern Ireland
ECM and PCB fabrication facilities.  In fiscal 1995, the Company
liquidated or sold many  assets associated with its United States
PCB fabrication facility and its ECM operations.  The Company
maintains its corporate headquarters in Tigard, Oregon.

    The Company also has divested its non-ECM and non-PCB
businesses in recent years, including its communications
business, its pressure gauge and hose manufacturing operations,
its emergency lighting equipment manufacturing operations and its
engineering services operations.  


RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

    The Company incurred substantial operating losses in recent
years that have impaired operations and positive cash flows. 
These losses totaled $4,970,000, $6,948,000, and $5,067,000, in
the fiscal years ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993,
respectively.  The Company realized net profits of $75,000 and
$1,073,000 in 1995 and 1993, respectively, and incurred a net
loss of $8,354,000 in the 1994 fiscal year.  The fiscal 1995 net
profit, however, included an extraordinary gain of $2,441,000
recognized as a result of the extinguishment of the Company's
senior debt in fiscal year 1995, and a gain of $3,317 on a sale
of assets in fiscal year 1995.  The fiscal 1993 net profit
included an extraordinary gains from exchanges of the Company's
7% and 8-1/2% convertible subordinated debentures ("CSDs") for
equity, and a $603,000 gain from the sale of a discontinued
business.

    The losses in the Company's ECM and PCB fabrication
businesses have resulted from certain Company-specific factors,
including yield and quality problems, facility underutilization,
delays in meeting delivery schedules, collection problems and
management turnover, as well as from excess production capacity
in the industry putting extreme downward pressure on the
Company's prices and production volume.  As a result, the Company
sold or liquidated its unprofitable United States operations and
concentrated efforts on its profitable European operations.  

    In addition to improving its operations, the Company must
also increase sales volume and improve margins in order to
maintain its continuing operations in a profitable position. 
Notwithstanding the steps that have been taken to address the
Company's operating problems during the past several years, the
Company has only recently realized operating profits from its
continuing operations and there can be no assurance that such
profits will continue.  Maintaining profitability while managing
the Company's working capital is required in order to ensure the
Company's liquidity and the Company's cash balances are at levels
required to operate its business.  For management's response to
these operating issues, together with other significant events
and conditions occurring during the last three years, see the
1995 Annual Report to Stockholders under the caption
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" on pages 3 to 12 thereto.

    In December 1994, the Company successfully consummated an
integrated plan retiring over $12,000,000 of its senior debt upon
the sale of certain assets of the Company's Aeroscientifc Corp.
subsidiary, located in Beaverton, Oregon, to Yamamoto
Manufacturing (USA), Inc.  In addition, the liens of the
Company's two major senior lenders were contemporaneously
eliminated.  The release of liens was achieved by the Company
concluding termination agreements with Sanwa Bank California
("Sanwa") which covered Sanwa's term loan to the Company, and
with The Tokai Bank Ltd. ("Tokai") regarding its letter of credit
issued to First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. in connection
with Industrial Revenue Bonds ("IRBs") issued by the State of
Oregon.

    The January 17, 1994 Los Angeles earthquake caused major
structural damage to two leased buildings in Chatsworth,
California housing the Company's subsidiary, A.J. Electronics,
Inc. (A.J.).  In August 1994, after three months of  review, the
Small Business Administration Disaster Assistance Division
("SBA") denied A.J.'s request for economic financial assistance
regarding damage suffered in the Los Angeles earthquake.  A.J.
was unable to recover from the effects of the earthquake and
incurred substantial operating losses and cash outlays since the
January earthquake.  In its financial plan, A.J. predicted that
it would not recover economically until sometime in fiscal year
1996.  Management concluded, after the SBA's decision to deny
A.J. assistance, that A.J. would be a substantial economic burden
on the consolidated group considering the limited working capital
available to the Company.  On January 17, 1995, the Company sold
virtually all of A.J.'s operating assets to Raven Industries,
Inc., an entity unaffiliated with the Company.

    A program of acquisitions and mergers is being pursued in an
effort to accelerate the turnaround of the Company's operating
position and to improve shareholder value.  Given current and
anticipated market conditions, management believes that the
Company must develop faster ways of rebuilding and expanding its
customer base to withstand the impact of continued downsizing at
major customers.  No assurance can be given that the revised
strategic plan will be successful.  

FINANCIAL INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHICAL AREA

    The Company is principally engaged in two lines of business,
e.g., the provision of ECM services and the fabrication of PCBs. 
Information for each of the Company's last three fiscal years,
with respect to the amounts of revenues from sales to
unaffiliated customers, operating profit or loss and identifiable
assets of these segments is set forth under the caption "Selected
Financial Data" appearing on pages 2 and 33 of the Company's 1995
Annual Report to Shareholders. Such information is incorporated
herein by this reference and is made a part hereof.

ELECTRONIC CONTRACT MANUFACTURING AND PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
FABRICATION BUSINESSES

    The ECM and PCB fabrication industries and the markets in
which the Company's customers compete are characterized by rapid
technological change and product obsolescence.  As a result, the
end services provided and products made by the Company's ECM and
PCB fabrication customers have relatively short product lives. 
The Company believes that its future success in these industries
is dependent on its ability to continue to incorporate new
technology into its ECM and fabrication processes, to satisfy
increasing customer demands for quality and timely delivery, and
to be responsive to future changes in this dynamic market.

    The PCB fabrication market is highly fragmented.  Numerous
factors, however, have caused a shift toward consolidation in the
PCB fabrication industry, including extreme competition,
substantial excess production capacity experienced by the
industry prior to the current fiscal year, the greatly increased
capital and technical requirements to service the advanced
multilayer PCB fabrication market, and the inability of many PCB
fabricators to keep up with the changing demands and expectations
of customers on matters such as technical board characteristics,
quality, and timely delivery of product.

    Description of Products and Services--ECM.  The Company's ECM
operation provides turnkey ECM services using both surface mount
and through-hole interconnection technologies.  Under the turnkey
process, the Company procures customer-specified components from
suppliers, assembles the components onto PCBs, and performs
post-assembly testing.  The Company conducts the ECM portion of
its business through its DDL Electronics Limited ("DDL-E")
subsidiary servicing customers in Western Europe.  DDL-E does not
fabricate any of the components or PCBs used in these processes. 
However, it has, in the past, procured PCBs from the Company's
PCB fabricator.  The ECM business represented approximately 47%,
59% and 55% of the Company's consolidated sales for the fiscal
years ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. 

    Since turnkey electronic contract manufacturing may be a
substitute for all or some portion of a customer's captive ECM
capability, continuous communication between the Company and the
customer is critical.  To facilitate such communication, the
Company maintains a customer service department whose personnel
work closely with the customer throughout the assembly process. 
The Company's engineering and service personnel coordinate with
the customer on the implementation of new and re-engineered
products, thereby providing the customer with feedback on such
issues as ease of assembly and anticipated production lead times. 
Component procurement is commenced after component specifications
are verified and approved sources are confirmed with the
customer.  Concurrently, assembly routing and procedures for
conformance with the workmanship standards of the Institute for
Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits ("IPC") are
defined and planned.  Additionally, "in-circuit" test fixturing
is designed and developed.  "In-circuit" tests are normally
performed on all assembled circuit boards for turnkey projects. 
Such tests verify that components have been properly inserted and
meet certain functional standards and that electrical circuits
are properly completed.  In addition, under protocols specified
by the customer, the Company performs customized functional tests
designed to ensure that the board or assembly will perform its
intended function.  The Company's personnel monitor all stages of
the assembly process in an effort to provide flexible and rapid
responses to the customer's requirements, including changes in
design, order size, and delivery schedule.

    The materials procurement element of the Company's turnkey
services consists of the planning, purchasing, expediting, and
financing of the components and materials required to assemble a
PCB or system-level assembly.  Customers have increasingly
required the Company and other independent providers of ECM
services to purchase all or some components directly from
component manufacturers or distributors and to finance the
components and materials.  In establishing a turnkey relationship
with an independent provider of ECM services, a customer must
incur expenses in qualifying that provider of ECM services and,
in some cases, its sources of component supply, refining product
design and ECM processes, and developing mutually compatible
information and reporting systems.  With this relationship
established, the Company believes that customers experience
significant difficulty in expeditiously and effectively
reassigning a turnkey project to a new assembler or in taking on
the project themselves.  Alternatively, the Company faces the
obstacle of attracting new customers away from existing ECM
providers or from performing services in-house.

    Production of product for a customer is only performed when a
firm order is received.  Revenue is recognized when product is
shipped.  Customer cancellation of orders are infrequent and are
subject to cancellation charges.  More often a customer will
delay shipment of orders based on its actual or anticipated
needs.  Customer orders are produced based on one of two
production methods, either "Turnkey" (where DDL-E provides all
materials, labor and equipment associated with producing the
customers' product) or "Consigned" (DDL-E provides labor and
equipment only for manufacturing product).  Material costs
customarily represents 70% of the turnkey method's sales price. 
In other words, a change from turnkey to consigned orders at
DDL-E can result in a decline in sales volume without a reduction
in profit margin.

    Description of Products and Services--PCB Fabrication.  The
Company fabricates and sells advanced, multilayer PCBs based on
designs and specifications provided by the Company's customers. 
These specifications are developed either solely through the
design efforts of the customer or through the design efforts of
the customer working together with the Company's design and
engineering staff.  Customers submit requests for quotations on
each job and the Company prepares bids based on its own cost
estimates.  The Company currently conducts the fabrication
portion of its PCB business through its Northern Ireland,
Irlandus Circuits Limited ("Irlandus") subsidiary.  The Company's
fabrication facilities in Anaheim, California were shut down in
fiscal year 1992 and its Beaverton, Oregon facility was sold in
the current fiscal  year.  The PCB fabrication business
represented approximately 53%, 41% and 45% of DDL's consolidated
sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993,
respectively, with four or more layer boards constituting a
substantial portion of those sales.  

    PCBs range from simple single and double-sided boards to
multilayer boards with more than 20 layers.  When PCBs are joined
with electronic components in the assembly process, they comprise
the basic building blocks for electronic equipment.  Single-sided
PCBs are used in electronic games and automobile ignition
systems, whereas multilayer PCBs are used in more advanced
applications such as computers, office equipment, communications,
instrumentation, and defense systems.

    PCBs consist of fine lines of a conductive material, such as
copper, which are bonded to a non-conductive panel, typically
rigid laminated epoxy glass.  The conductive pathways in the PCBs
form electrical circuits and replace wire as a means of
connecting electronic components.  On technologically advanced
multilayer boards, conductive pathways between layers are
connected with traditional plated through-holes and may
incorporate surface mount technology. "Through-holes" are holes
drilled entirely through the board that are plated with a
conductive material and constitute the primary connection between
the circuitry on the different layers of the board and the
electronic components attached to the boards later.  "Surface
mount" boards are boards on which electrical components are
soldered instead of being inserted into through-holes.  Although
substantially more complex and difficult to produce, surface
mount boards can substantially reduce wasted space associated
with through-hole technology and permit greatly increased surface
and inner layer densities.  Complex boards may also have "via" or
"blind-via" holes that connect inner layers of multi-layer board
or connect an inner layer to the outside of the board.

    The development of increasingly sophisticated electronic
equipment, which combines higher performance and reliability with
reduced size and cost, has created a demand for increased
complexity, miniaturization, and density in electronic circuitry. 
In response to this demand, multilayer technology is advancing
rapidly on many fronts, including the widespread use of surface
mount technology.  More sophisticated boards are being created by
decreasing the width of the tracks on the board and increasing
the amount of circuitry that can be placed on each layer. 
Fabricating advanced multilayer PCBs requires high levels of
capital investment and complex, rapidly changing production
processes.

    As the sophistication and complexity of PCBs increase,
manufacturing yields typically fall.  Historically, the Company
relied on tactical quality procedures, in which defects are
assumed to exist and quality inspectors examine product lot by
lot and board by board to identify deficiencies, using automated
optical inspection and electrical test equipment.  This
traditional approach to quality control is not adequate to
produce acceptably high yields in an advanced multilayer PCB
fabrication environment, as it focuses on identifying, rather
than preventing, defects.  In recognition of this limitation,
Irlandus is striving to create a positive environment
encompassing management's awareness, process understanding, and
operator involvement in identifying and correcting production
problems before defects occur.

    The International Standards Organization ("ISO") has
published internationally recognized standards of workmanship and
quality.  Both Irlandus and DDL-E, the Company's ECM and PCB
operations in Northern Ireland, have achieved ISO 9002
certification which will be increasingly necessary to attract
business.  

    ECM Facilities.  DDL-E conducts its operations from a 67,000
square foot facility in Northern Ireland that was purchased in
1989.  Prior to DDL-E commencing operations in the Spring of
1990, approximately 1,600,000 pounds sterling (approximately
$2,700,000) was
expended on auto-insertion equipment, surface mount device
placement equipment, wave solder equipment, visual inspection
equipment, and automated test equipment.  The Company believes
that this facility possesses the technology to compete
effectively and that the facility is capable of supporting
projected growth for up to the next two years.

    Fabrication Facilities.  Irlandus occupies a 63,000 square
foot production facility and an adjacent 9,000 square foot office
and storage facility.  Irlandus' existing capacity is expected to
be adequate to meet anticipated order levels for the next three
years.  Aeroscientific stopped recognizing revenue at its 44,000
square foot Beaverton, Oregon facility when it was sold to
Yamamoto in December 1994.  

    Marketing and Customers.  The Company's sales in the ECM and
fabrication businesses and the percentage of its consolidated
sales to the principal end-user markets it serves for the last
three fiscal years were as follows (dollars in thousands):

                                                                
                            Year Ended June 30,

Markets                  1995                 1994            1993 
     
Computer           $7,115     24.1%     $23,905   49.3%  $25,479    44.0%
Communications      6,926     23.4        8,396   17.3    14,881    25.7
Financial           2,067     7.0            -      -         -       -  
Industrial & 
 Instrumentation    6,044    20.4         6,196   12.8    6,555      11.3
Medical             4,668    15.8        6,533    13.4    6,582      11.4
Automotive            175      .6          889     1.8    1,035       1.8
Government/
  Military          1,362     4.6        1,411     2.9    1,509       2.6
Other               1,219     4.1        1,199     2.5    1,842       3.2

    Total         $29,576   100.0%     $48,529   100.0% $57,883       100.0%


    The Company markets its ECM and PCB fabrication services
through both a direct sales force and independent manufacturers'
representatives.  The Company's marketing strategy is to develop
close relationships with, and to increase sales to, certain
existing and new major ECM and fabrication customers.  This
includes becoming involved at an early stage in the design of
PCBs for these customers' new products.  DDL believes that this
strategy is necessary to keep abreast of rapidly changing
technological needs and to develop new ECM and fabrication
processes, thereby enhancing the Company's ECM and fabrication
capabilities and its position in the industry.  As a result of
this strategy, however, fluctuations experienced by one or more
of these customers in demand for their products may have and have
had adverse effects on the Company's sales and profitability.

    At the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995, the
Company's ECM business had approximately 16 customers, all of
which were located in Western Europe, compared to 60 in fiscal
1994 and 37 in fiscal year 1993.  At the end of fiscal year 1995,
the Company fabricated PCBs for approximately 98 customers,
substantially all of which are located in Western Europe,
compared to 211 in fiscal year 1994 and 169 in fiscal year 1993. 
The Company's five largest customers accounted for 21%, 45% and
39% of consolidated sales during fiscal years 1995, 1994, and
1993, respectively.  For all three fiscal years , no single PCB
fabrication customer accounted for more than 4% of the Company's
consolidated sales.  The Company's largest European ECM customer
accounted for approximately 8% of consolidated sales in fiscal
year 1994.  Dataproducts Corporation, the largest customer of the
Company's former domestic ECM operation, accounted for 13% of
consolidated sales in both fiscal years 1993 and 1994.  No single
customer of the Company's domestic PCB or ECM discontinued
businesses accounted for more than 2% of consolidated sales in
fiscal year 1995.

    Two customers of the Company's European ECM operation made
combined purchases equal to or in excess of 12% and 10% of
consolidated sales during fiscal years 1995 and 1994,
respectively.  These two customers, GE Medical Systems, a General
Electric Company ("GE Medical") and DeLaRue Fortronic, LTD,
("Fortronic") comprised almost 90% of the Company's European ECM
sales in fiscal year 1994.  This amount dropped in fiscal year
1995 to 36%.  Sales to both of these customers diminished in the
latter part of fiscal year 1994.  Fortronic's purchases declined
due to reduced orders of its magnetic card reader products in the
European market, while orders from GE Medical have been reduced
as that company relocated its headquarters to the United States. 
Weakness in orders from these two customers continued into the
first half of fiscal year 1995, but orders increased in the last
half of fiscal year 1995. 

    The decreased number of customers in both the ECM and PCB
businesses reflects the impact of the Company's discontinuance of
business at several of its  subsidiaries.  The number of European
customers, however, has increased reflecting  the Company's
change in marketing activities to increase its customer base in
smaller, higher margin entities and reduce the Company's
dependency on large run volume, low margin customers.

    Raw Materials and Suppliers.  In its ECM business, the
Company uses numerous suppliers of electronic components and
other materials.  The Company's customers may specify the
particular manufacturers and components, such as the Intel 80486 
microprocessor, to be used in the ECM process.  To the extent
these components are not available on a timely basis or are in
short supply because of allocations imposed by the component
manufacturer, and the customer is unwilling to accept a
substitute component, delays may occur.  Such delays are
experienced in the ECM business from time to time and have caused
sales and inventory fluctuations at the Company's ECM business.

    The principal materials used by the Company in its
fabrication processes are copper laminate, epoxy glass, copper
alloys, gold and various chemicals, all of which are readily
available to the Company from various sources.  The Company
believes that its sources of materials for its fabrication
business are adequate for its needs and that it is not
substantially dependent upon any one supplier.

    Industry Conditions and Competition.  The markets in which
the ECM and PCB fabrication businesses operate are intensely
competitive and have experienced excess production capacity
during the past few years.  Seasonality is not a factor in the
ECM and PCB fabrication businesses.  There has been significant
downward pressure on the prices that the Company is able to
charge for its ECM and fabrication services.  More recently,
market conditions have improved which has resulted in an increase
in  product demand.  While the Company believes that market
conditions will continue to improve, it does not believe that
prices will increase as quickly.  ECM and fabrication customers
are increasing their orders, but are reluctant to pay more for
such services primarily due to the industry's excess capacity and
price competition.  Additionally, competition is principally
based on price, product quality, technical capability, and the
ability to deliver products on schedule.  Both the price of and
the demand for ECM services and PCBs are sensitive to economic
conditions, changing technologies, and other factors.  The
technology used in the ECM services and fabrication of PCBs is
widely available, and there are a large number of domestic and
foreign competitors.  Many of these firms are larger than the
Company and have significantly greater financial, marketing, and
other resources.  In addition, the Company faces a competitive
disadvantage against better financed competitors because the
Company's current financial situation causes certain customers to
be reluctant to do business with the Company's operating
subsidiaries.  Many of the Company's competitors have also made
substantial capital expenditures in recent years and operate
technologically advanced ECM and fabrication facilities.  In
addition, some of the Company's customers have substantial
in-house ECM capability, and to a lesser extent, PCB fabrication
capacity.  There is a risk that when these customers are
operating at less than full capacity they will use their own
facilities rather than purchase from the Company.  Despite this
risk, management believes that the Company has not experienced a
significant loss of business to in-house fabricators or
assemblers.  There also are risks that other customers,
particularly in the ECM market, will develop their own in-house
capabilities, that additional competitors will acquire the
ability to produce advanced, multilayer boards in commercial
quantities, or the ability to provide ECM services, and that
foreign firms, including large, technologically advanced Japanese
firms, will increase their share of the United States or European
market.

    Price competition in the computer marketplace which comprises
the Company's largest market is intense.  This has caused price
erosion and lower margins, particularly in the Company's PCB
fabrication business.  Significant improvement in the Company's
PCB gross margins may not be achieved in the near future due to
excess PCB production capacity worldwide and substantial
competitive pressures in the Company's principal market. 
Generally, the Company's customers are reducing inventory levels
and seeking lower prices from their vendors, such as the Company,
to compete effectively.


GENERAL

    Backlog.  At June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993, the Company's ECM
and PCB fabrication businesses had combined backlogs of
$9,247,000, $6,902,000 and $19,612,000, respectively.  Backlog is
comprised of orders believed to be firm for products that have
scheduled shipment dates during the next 12 months.  Some orders
in the backlog may be canceled under certain conditions.  
Historically, a substantial portion of the Company's orders have
been for shipment within 90 days of the placement of the order
and, therefore, backlog information as of the end of a particular
period is not necessarily indicative of trends in the Company's
business.  In addition, the timing of orders from major customers
may result in significant fluctuations in the Company's backlog
and operating results from period to period.

    Backlog at June 30, 1995 included only the Company's European
subsidiaries.  The increase from fiscal year 1994 reflects higher
order demand from existing ECM customers and new outstanding
orders from new ECM customers.  The Company's European PCB
backlog increased slightly from the last fiscal year.  The
fabrication group has and is expected to further increase sales
volume, but will not increase backlog as the sales increase is
expected to come from quick turn orders that are completed within
a one month accounting cycle and would, therefore, not be
included in the period end backlog.

    Backlog at June 30, 1994 had declined from previous years
primarily due to the following reasons:

    1.   Loss of large customers and their projected orders in
the Company's ECM business.  Total backlog for the Company's ECM
operations was $4,214,000 at fiscal year end 1994 versus
$17,612,000 at fiscal year end 1993.

    2.   Change in customer base in both the Company's ECM and
PCB units to a larger customer base with smaller, higher margin
purchase orders.  Many of these customers have short notice,
quick turn requirements, and few orders in the Company's backlog
therefore extend beyond a one to two month period.  Many of last
year's backlogged orders covered an eight to 12 month period.

    On July 1, 1993, the largest customer at the Company's
domestic ECM operation in fiscal year 1993, Dataproducts
Corporation, ("Dataproducts") issued a temporary stop work order
on the bulk of its existing purchase orders. Dataproducts' total
purchases for the year ended June 30, 1993, were approximately
$7,703,000, or approximately 13% of the Company's consolidated
revenues for the year and $6,322,000 or 13% of fiscal year 1994
consolidated sales. Dataproducts' order backlog as of June 30,
1993 was approximately $5,747,000 or approximately 29% of the
Company's consolidated backlog at such date.  Approximately
$700,000 of the Dataproducts backlog was canceled as a result of
the stop work order and the remaining orders were rescheduled for
delivery during the first six months of fiscal year 1994.  There
were no Dataproducts orders in the fiscal year end 1994 backlog. 
Because of the Dataproducts cancellation and reschedules, the
level of A.J.'s revenues were adversely affected in that year. 
Events of this nature can materially delay or undermine the
Company's ability to complete a successful turnaround and achieve
operating profitability which is critical to the Company's
viability.

    Environmental Regulation.  Federal, state, and local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment affect
the Company's ECM and PCB fabrication businesses.  Aeroscientific
has used or uses chemicals in the manufacture of their products
that are classified by the Environmental Protection Agency
("EPA") as hazardous substances. In the past, some of these
chemicals were either treated on site or removed from the
Company's facilities and disposed of elsewhere by arrangement
with the owners or operators of disposal sites.  The Company's
current operation treats all hazardous substances on site and
reclaims, as reusable material, virtually 100% of the byproducts
produced.  In late 1982, Aeroscientific-Anaheim received notice
from the EPA that it was regarded as a potentially responsible
party ("PRP") under federal environmental laws in connection with
a waste disposal site known as the "Stringfellow Superfund Site"
in Riverside County, California, which is presently being
considered by governmental authorities for remediation. 
Aeroscientific-Anaheim has been named as a third party defendant
by other PRPs in a case brought in U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of California in 1984, by the United States
Government.  The information developed during discovery and
investigation thus far indicates that Aeroscientific-Anaheim
supplied relatively small amounts of waste to the site as
compared to the many other defendants.  As part of the currently
proposed Settlement Agreement, de minimis polluters would pay a
fixed amount plus an amount that varies based on volume of
material dumped at the site.  Under these guidelines, the
Company's probable liability will be $120,000. Final settlement
and timing of payment are currently undeterminable, and no
assurances can be given that any settlement will be achieved. 
The Company, however, has accrued sufficient liability reserves
to cover the proposed settlement as of fiscal year end 1995.  Any
further remedial costs or damage awards in these cases may be
significant and management believes that the Company's allocated
share of such costs or damages could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business or financial condition.  The
actions are still in the pre-trial and discovery stages and a
prediction of outcome is difficult.  There is, as in the case of
most environmental litigation, the theoretical possibility of
joint and several liability being imposed upon Aeroscientific for
damages which may be awarded.  Total estimated cleanup costs for
the Stringfellow site have been estimated at $600 million.  The
Company's possible range of liability is undeterminable, and the
reliability and precision of estimated cleanup costs are subject
to a myriad of factors which are not currently measurable.

    The Company is aware of certain chemicals that exist in the
ground at its previously leased facility at 1240-1244 South
Claudina Street, Anaheim, California.  The Company has notified
the appropriate governmental agencies and is proceeding with
remediation and investigative studies regarding soil and
groundwater contamination.  The Company believes that it will be
required to implement a continuing remedial program for the site,
the cost of which is currently unknown.  The installation of
water and soil extraction wells was completed in August 1994.  A
plan for soil remediation was completed about the same time and
was submitted to regulatory authorities.  The full extent of
potential ground water pollution could not be determined given
preliminary estimates.  The Company retained the services of
Harding Lawson and Associates in May 1995 to begin the vapor
extraction of pollutant from the soil and to perform exploratory
hydro-punch testing to determine the full extent and cost of the
potential ground water contamination.  These processes are in
their preliminary stages and a complete and accurate estimate of
the full and potential costs cannot be determined at this time.  
The Company believes that the resolution of these matters will
require a significant cash outlay.  Initial estimates from
Harding Lawson indicate that it could cost as much as $3,000,000
for full remediation of the site and take over ten years to
complete.  The Company and Aeroscientific  entered into an
agreement to share the costs of environmental remediation with
the landlord at the Anaheim facility.  Under this agreement, the
Company is obligated to pay 80% of the site's total remediation
costs up to $725,000 (i.e., up to the Company's share of
$580,000) with any costs above $725,000 being shared equally
between the Company and the landlord.  To date, the Company has
paid $239,000 as its share of the remediation costs.  The Company
anticipates that its share of the final remediation cost should
approximate the amount it has presently reserved.  Under the
current remediation agreement, the Company is making monthly
payments of approximately $18,000 through the end of the current
fiscal year.  Management believes that the Company has the
ability to make these payments when due.

    From time to time the Company is also involved in other waste
disposal remediation efforts and proceedings associated with its
other facilities.  Based on information currently available to
the Company, management does not believe that the costs of such
efforts and proceedings will have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business or financial condition.

Headquarters Operations

    The Company maintains its corporate headquarters in a 3,000
square foot leased building located in Tigard, Oregon.  In
addition to executive officers, 5 employees work in the Company's
headquarters.  The Company's headquarters operations include the
management of the Company's operating subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis, the arranging of financing for those
operations and capital expenditures and the management of the
remaining assets of the Company's discontinued United States
operations.

    Employees.  The Company currently employs approximately 340
persons.


Item 2.  Properties

    The following table lists principal plants and properties of
the Company and its subsidiaries:
                                                       Owned
                                            Square       or
         Location                           Footage    Leased

ECM and PCB fabrication businesses:

Tigard, Oregon                                3,000     Leased
Chatsworth, California (sublet during 
fiscal 1995)                                 48,000     Leased
Craigavon, Northern Ireland                  63,000     Owned
Craigavon, Northern Ireland                  67,000     Owned
Craigavon, Northern Ireland                   9,000     Owned
         

         The Northern Ireland properties are pledged as security
for installment loans payable to the Industrial Development Board
for Northern Ireland from which the properties were purchased. 
These loans had an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately
$1,350,000 at June 30, 1995.  

         The Company's Tigard, Oregon headquarters facility is
leased for a two  year term expiring on January 6, 1997 from an
unaffiliated third party.   Rent on the headquarters is paid
monthly in advance.  Management believes that the Tigard
facilities are adequate to meet the Company's needs for the
foreseeable future.


Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

    As to other litigation matters that are not specifically
described under the caption "General - Environmental Regulation',
Item 1 above, no material legal proceedings are presently pending
to which the Company or any of its property is subject, other
than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company's
business 

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

    At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 31, 1995, Bernee
D.L. Strom and Erven Tallman were elected as Class II directors
by the shareholders, replacing former Class II directors Rockell
N. Hankin and John F. Coyne.  Election of Directors was the only
matter proposed at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  The
results of the election are as follows:
                                  FOR            WITHHELD

John F. Coyne                   2,743,980         42,782
Rockell N. Hankin               2,744,980         41,782
Bernee D. L. Strom              9,988,812         28,458
Erven Tallman                   9,988,812         28,458

    In recognition of the shareholder vote, and prior to the
certification of the results by the independent inspectors of
election, John F. Coyne and Rockell N. Hankin resigned from the
Board of Directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.  At a meeting of the Board, the remaining Directors
accepted these resignations and elected Bernee D. L. Strom and
Erven Tallman to fill the vacancies and to serve as directors
pending certification of the election results.  Solicitation for
election of Ms. Strom and Mr. Tallman as Class II Directors was
made by an opposition shareholder committee known as
"Shareholders Committee to Remove a Moribund Management"
("SCRMM"). A Settlement Agreement  was entered into between the
departing Board members of management and SCRMM that, among other
things, provided for the election, without dispute, of Ms. Strom
and Mr. Tallman as Directors, required the resignation, without
dispute, of William E. Cook, the acceptance and recognition by
SCRMM of prior company employment and severance agreements with
management, and provision for payment of proxy solicitation
expenses of DDL up to $150,000 paid by the Company and a similar
amount paid for SCRMM's proxy solicitation expenses.
<PAGE>
                                  PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters       

    The information set forth under the caption "Market
Information" on page 35 of the Company's 1995 Annual Report to
Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference and made a part
hereof.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

    The information set forth under the caption "Selected
Financial Data" on page 2 of the Company's 1995 Annual Report to
Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference and made a part
hereof.

Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations

    The information set forth under the caption "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" on pages 3 through 12 of the Company's 1995 Annual
Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference and
made a part hereof.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

    The consolidated financial statements set forth on page 14
through 34 of the Company's 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders,
and the report of independent public accountants set forth on
page 13 of said Annual Report, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, are incorporated herein by reference and
made a part hereof.

Item 9.  Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure

    Effective June 13, 1994, Price Waterhouse was dismissed as
DDL Electronic's Inc.'s independent accountants for fiscal
year-end 1994.  

    Price Waterhouse's report on the financial statements for the
fiscal years 1993 and 1992 contained no adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to
audit scopes or accounting principles, except that as follows:

    Price Waterhouse's report dated September 4, 1992 for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 1992 included the following
explanatory paragraph:

    "The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations, has few alternative
financing sources, and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.  Management's plans in regard to these matters are also
described in Note 1.  The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty."

    The Company's management was given approval by its Board of
Directors and the Board's Audit Committee to retain another
certified accountant after Price Waterhouse required an 80%
increase in its annual service fees.

    There has never been any and continues to be no disagreements
between the Company and Price Waterhouse on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure or audit scope or procedure, including up until the
time of Price Waterhouse's dismissal.  The Company has given
Price Waterhouse unlimited authority to discuss its audit
practices of the Company with the Company's successor auditor.

    The Company retained KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as its new
independent auditors effective June 13, 1994. The Company did not
consult with KPMG Peat Marwick LLP on any accounting or tax
matter prior to Peat Marwick's appointment.

    Attached to the Company's Form 8-K, filed June 13, 1994,  was
Price Waterhouse's letter addressed to the Commission regarding
its response to Regulation S-K, Item 304.  Furthermore, Price
Waterhouse was informed that statements in the Company's 8-K/A,
Item 4(a)(1)(iv) included the period up until the time of Price
Waterhouse's dismissal.
<PAGE>

                                 PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

    
    Information called for in Item 10 is omitted because the
Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1995 a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Commission.  


Item 11. Executive Compensation


    Information called for in Item 10 is omitted because the
Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1995 a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Commission.  


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management

    Information called for in Item 10 is omitted because the
Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1995 a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Commission.  
    

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

    Information called for in Item 10 is omitted because the
Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1995 a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Commission.  

<PAGE>
                                  PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on
Form 8-K

                                                 Reference (Page)
                                       Form 10K    1995 Annual
                                                     Report to
                                                    Stockholders
(a)(1) List of Financial statements:
       List of data incorporated by reference:

Consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 1995, and 1994*    14
Consolidated statement of operations for the years 
ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993                       15
Consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for 
the years ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993             17
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the years
ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993                       16
Notes to consolidated financial statements                18
Report of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP on consolidated
financial statements                                      13

*   The Company utilizes a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the
Friday closest to June 30, which, for fiscal years 1995 and 1994,
fell on June 30 and July 1, respectively.  For 10K filing
purposes, June 30, 1995, is utilized for the Company's fiscal
year end.

(a)(2)   List of Financial statement schedules for the years
ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993:**

Reports of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP and 
Price Waterhouse on
financial statement schedules              14

VIII - Valuation and Qualifying 
       Accounts and Reserves               15
IX   - Short-Term Bank Borrowings          None

**  Schedules other than those listed are omitted since they are
not applicable, not required, or the information required to be
set forth therein is included in the consolidated financial
statements or in the notes thereto.

(a)(3)   List of Exhibits:                   
Exhibit Index                               17

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

    During the fourth fiscal quarter, the following reports on
Form 8-K were filed:

    On April 11, 1995, a Form 8-K/A was filed pursuant to item 2,
Acquisition or Disposition of Assets, for filing of pro forma
financial information pursuant to Regulation S-X.

    On April 20, 1995, a Form 8-K was filed pursuant to item 5,
Other Events, for a  press release announcing that William E.
Cook, the Company's Chairman and CEO, had exercised stock options
to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

    On May 11, 1995, a Form 8-K was filed pursuant to item 5,
Other Events, for a press release that announced the Company's
fiscal third quarter ended March 31, 1995 operating results.

    On June 7, 1995, a Form 8-K was filed pursuant to item 5,
Other Events, for a press release issued June 1, 1995 announcing
the resignation of William E. Cook, the Company's Chairman and
CEO and the results of the Company's annual meeting of
shareholders on May 31, 1995 in which five new directors were
added to the board replacing Mr. Cook and two existing directors.

    On June 21, 1995, a Form 8-K was filed pursuant to item 1,
Changes in Control of Registrant, that announced the results of
the Company's May 31, 1995 annual meeting of shareholders and the
change in the Company's Board of Directors and management.
<PAGE>

                           REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
                AUDITORS' ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



The Board of Directors 
DDL Electronics, Inc.


Under date of August 18, 1995, we reported on the consolidated
balance sheets of DDL Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years
then ended, as contained in the 1995 annual report to
stockholders.  These consolidated financial statements and our
report thereon are incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10K for the year 1995.  In connection with our audit of
the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also
audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as
listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10K.  This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express and opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.





KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Portland, Oregon
August 18, 1995






                    Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1975
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, the 1980 Employee Stock Option
Plan, the 1981 Incentive Stock Plan, and the 1985 and 1987 Stock
Incentive Plans (No. 33-18356) and the 1991 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan (No. 33-45102) of DDL Electronics, Inc. of our Report
dated August 20, 1993, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedules,
which appears in this Form 10-K


Price Waterhouse LLP
September 28, 1995
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                     DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SCHEDULE VIII - VALUATION AND
                        QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES


                         Balance at     Charged to                    Balance
                         Beginning      Costs and                      at End
                         of Period      Expenses       Deductions   of Period


Allowance for doubtful accounts -

Year ended:
<S>                        <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
June 30, 1993            $748,000        $570,000      $(373,000)     $945,000

June 30, 1994             945,000         293,000       (705,000)      533,000

June 30, 1995             533,000          95,000       (446,000)      182,000

Inventory reserves -

Year ended:

June 30, 1993            $275,000        $780,000      $(881,000)      $174,000

June 30, 1994             174,000         266,000        (56,000)       384,000

June 30, 1995             384,000          62,000       (290,000)       156,000
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, DDL Electronics, Inc. has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

DDL Electronics, Inc.


By__/s/ Don A. Raig____________                                   
    Don A.Raig                           Date: September 28, 1995
    Interim President and Chief Operating                        
    Officer and Director                              
              


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

By___/s/  Don A. Raig_____________                                
    Don A.Raig                           Date: September 28, 1995
    Interim President and Chief Operating                         
    Officer and Director                                          
  
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

_/s/___Erven Tallman_______________                               
Erven Tallman                         Date: September 28, 1995
Acting Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director



/s/___Rob Wilson____________________                              
Rob Wilson                           Date: September 28, 1995
Interim Vice President and Director

/s/____Philip H. Alspach____________                             
 Philip H. Alspach                    Date: September 28, 1995
 Director                        

/s/____Bernee D. L. Strom__________                               
Bernee D.L. Strom                    Date : September 28, 1995
Director                        

/s/____Melvin Foster______________                                
Melvin Foster                        Date: September 28, 1995
Director       
<PAGE>
                               EXHIBIT INDEX

3-a       Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Commission File No.
33-7440)

3-b       Bylaws of the Company, amended and restated, effective
March 1995 

3-c       Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company to increase authorized number of
common shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-c of the
Company's 1990 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

3-d       Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8, Commission File No. 33-7440)

3-e       Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8, Commission File No. 33-7440)

4-a       Indenture dated July 15, 1988, applicable to the
Company's 8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due August
1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-c of the
Company's 1988 Annual Report on Form 10-K) 

4-b       Supplemental Indenture relating to the Company's 8-1/2%
Convertible Subordinated Debentures due August 1, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-b of the Company's 1991
Annual Report on Form 10-K)    

4-c       Indenture relating to the Company's 7% Convertible
Subordinated Debentures due 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4-c of the Company's 1991 Annual Report on Form 10-K)   

4-d       Rights Agreement dated as of June 10, 1989, between the
Company and Bank of America, as Rights Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K dated
June 15, 1989)

4-e       Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of February 21,
1991, amending the Rights Agreement dated as of June 10, 1989,
between the Company and Bank of America, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Registration
Statement No. 33-39115) 

10-a      Intentionally not used

10-b      1980 Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1 of Registration Statement No. 2-69580)

10-c      1981 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4 of Registration Statement No. 2-79576)

10-d      1985 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4a of Registration Statement No. 33-3172)

10-e      1987 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4a of Registration Statement No. 33-18356)

10-f      Form of Indemnity Agreement with officers and directors
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-o of the Company's 1987
Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-g      Consulting Agreement dated March 26, 1990, between the
Company and Thomas C. Beiseker (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10-s of the Company's 1990 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-h           Standard Industrial Lease-Net dated August 1,
1984, among the Company, Aeroscientific Corp., and Bradmore
Realty Investment Company, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10-w of the Company's 1990 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-i      Net Lease Agreement dated December 2, 1985, among the
Company, Catel Telecommunications, Inc. and Phoenix Mutual life
Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-x of
the Company's 1990 Annual Report on Form 10-K) 

10-j      Agreement dated March 10, 1992, between Irlandus
Circuits Limited and the Industrial Development Board for
Northern Ireland amending the Grant Agreement dated September 16,
1987, between Irlandus and the Industrial Development Board
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-br of the Company's 1992
Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-k      Agreement dated September 10, 1991, between DDL
Electronics Limited and the Industrial Development Board for
Northern Ireland amending the Grant Agreement dated August 29,
1989, between DDL Electronics and the Industrial Development
Board (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-bt of the
Company's 1992 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-l      Agreement dated November 22, 1991, between DDL
Electronics Limited and the Industrial Development Board for
Northern Ireland amending the Grant Agreement dated August 29,
1989, between DDL Electronics and the Industrial Development
Board (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-bu of the
Company's 1992 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-m      Agreement dated March 9, 1992, between DDL Electronics
Limited and the Industrial Development Board for Northern Ireland
amending the Grant Agreement dated August 29, 1989, between DDL
Electronics and the Industrial Development Board (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10-bv of the Company's 1992 Annual Report on
Form 10-K)

10-n      Agreement dated June 22, 1992, between DDL Electronics
Limited and the Industrial Development Board for Northern Ireland
amending the Grant Agreement dated August 29, 1989, between DDL
Electronics and the Industrial Development Board (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10-bw of the Company's 1992 Annual Report on
Form 10-K)

10-o      Standard Offer, Agreement and Escrow Instructions for
Purchase of Real Estate dated July 15, 1992, between Mark Lainer
and/or Nominee and the Company's A.J. Electronics, Inc.
subsidiary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 2, 1992)

10-p      Standard Industrial Lease - Net dated October 15, 1992,
between L.N.M. Corporation-Desert Land Managing Corp. and the
Company's A.J. Electronics, Inc. subsidiary (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 1993)

10-q      Standard Offer, Agreement and Escrow Instructions for
Purchase of Real Estate dated October 19, 1992, between Business
Ventures Corporation and the Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended January 1, 1993)

10-r      Form of Exchange Agreement between certain holders of
the Company's 7% and 8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures
and the Company dated as of November 11, 1992 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 1993)

10-s      Warrant Agreement by and between the Company and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company dated as of November 11,
1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28.2 of the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 7, 1993)

10-t      Lease Modification and Termination Agreement and
Promissory Note, dated April 28, 1993, between the Company and
Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 1993)

10-u      Form of Exchange Agreement between certain holders of
the Company's 7% and 8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures
and the Company dated May 14, 1993 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 28.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 19, 1993)

10-v      Amendment to Lease Modification and Termination
Agreement, dated June 11, 1993, between the Company and Phoenix
Home Life Mutual Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10-bz of Registration Statement No 33-63618)

10-w      Form of Exchange Agreement between certain holders of
the Company's 7% and 8-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures
and the Company dated June 24, 1993 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10-ca of Registration Statement No. 33-63618)

10-x      Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 7, 1993, between
Meret Optical Communications, Inc. and the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10-cb of Registration Statement No.
33-63618)

10-y      Second Amendment to Lease among Bradmore Realty
Investment Company, Ltd., the Company and the Company's
Aeroscientific Corp. subsidiary, dated July 2, 1993 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10-cd of Registration Statement No.
33-63618)

10-z      1991 General Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan adopted on
December 31, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-cf of
the Company's 1993 Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-aa          Form of Series B preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement between the Company and the Industrial Development
Board for Northern Ireland (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 1993)

10-ab          Data-Design Laboratories, Inc. 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Commission file No.
33-74400)

10-ac          Data-Design Laboratories, Inc. Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.8 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8,
Commission File No. 33-74400)

10-ad          Form of Land Registry for the Company's Northern
Ireland subsidiaries dated November 4, 1993 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report of
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993)

10-ae          Form of Guaranty by the Company's Northern Ireland
subsidiaries dated November 4, 1993 in favor of The Tokai Bank,
Ltd. and First Interest Bank of Oregon (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1993)

10-af          Form of Guaranty by the Company's Northern Ireland
subsidiaries dated November 4, 1993 in favor of Sanwa Bank
California (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1993)

10-ag          Form of Severance Agreement for Key Employees of
the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company's 1994
Annual Report on Form 10-K)

10-ah          Subscription Agreement for 760,000 shares of DDL
Electronics, Inc.'s Common Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10a of the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1994)

10-ai          Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Yamamoto
Manufacturing USA Inc. ("Buyer") and Aeroscientific Corp.
("Seller") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a of the
Company's Report on Form 8K dated November 2, 1994)

10-aj          Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Raven
Industries, Inc., A.J. Electronics, Inc. and DDL Electronics,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's
Report on Form 8K dated January 17, 1995)

10-ak          Closing Settlement Statement executed by A.J.
Electronics Inc., DDL Electronics, Inc. and Raven Industries,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the Company's
Report on Form 8K dated January 17, 1995)

10-al          Non-Competition and Non-Disclosure Agreement
between A.J. Electronics and Raven Industries, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of the Company's Report of Form 8K
dated January 17, 1995)

10-am          Payoff Agreement between Sanwa Bank California and
the Company dated December 29, 1994 

10-an          Termination Agreement between First Interstate
Bank of Oregon, N.A., the Tokai Bank Ltd. and the Company dated
December 29, 1994

10-ao          Employment Agreement between DDL Electronics, Inc.
and William E. Cook

10-ap          Settlement Agreement between DDL Electronics, Inc.
and opposition shareholders committee (SCRMM) 

11        Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings.

13        Annual Report to security holders

16        Letter from Price Waterhouse regarding dismissal as
independent accountants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16
of the Company's 1994 Annual Report on Form 10K)

21        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

23a       Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP 

23b       Consent of Price Waterhouse, LLP

27        Financial Schedule for electronic filers

99        Undertaking for Form S-8 Registration Statement

                                                                  
                                                                
                                                               


EXHIBIT 3B
DDL Electronics, Inc.
(a Delaware corporation)

BYLAWS

(Amended and Restated Effective March 21, 1995)

ARTICLE I

Offices

SECTION 1.01  Registered Office.  The registered office of DDL
Electronics, Inc. (the "Corporation") in the State of Delaware
shall be at 1209 Orange Street, City of Wilmington, County of New
Castle, and the name of the registered agent in charge thereof
shall be The Corporation Trust Company.

SECTION 1.02  Other Offices.  The Corporation may also have an
office or offices at such other place or places, either within or
without the State of Delaware, as the Board of Directors (the
"Board") may from time to time determine or as the business of
the Corporation may require.

ARTICLE II

Meetings of Stockholders

SECTION 2.01  Annual Meetings.  Annual meetings of the
stockholders of the Corporation for the purpose of electing
directors and for the transaction of such other proper business
as may come before such meetings may be held at such time, date
and place as the Board shall determine by resolution.

SECTION 2.02  Special Meetings.  A special meeting of the
stockholders for the transaction of any proper business may be
called at any time by the Board for a majority of the Board. 
Special meetings may not be called by any other person or persons
or in any other manner.

SECTION 2.03  Place of Meetings.  All meetings of the
stockholders shall be held at such places, within or without the
State of Delaware, as may from time to time be designated by the
person or persons calling the respective meeting and specified in
the respective notices or waivers of notice thereof.

SECTION 2.04  Notice of Meetings.  Except as otherwise required
by law, notice of each meeting of the stockholders, whether
annual or special, shall be given not less than ten (10) nor more
than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting to each
stockholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting by
delivering a typewritten or printed notice thereof to him
personally, or by depositing such notice in the United States
mail, in a postage prepaid envelope, directed to him at his post
office address furnished by him to the Secretary of the
Corporation for such purpose or, if he shall not have furnished
to the Secretary his address for such purpose, then at his post
office address last known to the Secretary, or by transmitting a
notice thereof to him at such address by telegraph, cable, or
wireless.  Except as otherwise expressly required by law, no
publication of any notice of a meeting of the stockholders shall
be required.  Every notice of a meeting of the stockholders shall
state the place, date and hour of the meeting, and, in the case
of a special meeting, shall also state the purpose or purposes
for which the meeting is called.  Notice of any meeting of
stockholders shall not be required to be given to any stockholder
who shall have waived such notice and such notice shall be deemed
waived by any stockholder who shall attend such meeting in person
or by proxy, except as a stockholder who shall attend such
meeting for the express purpose of objecting, at the beginning of
the meeting, to the transaction of any business because the
meeting is not lawfully called or convened.  Except as otherwise
expressly required by law, notice of any adjourned meeting of the
stockholders need not be given if the time and place thereof are
announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken.

SECTION 2.05  Quorum.  Except in the case of any meeting for the
election of directors summarily ordered as provided by law, the
holders of record of a majority in voting interest of the shares
of stock of the Corporation entitled to be voted thereat, present
in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at any meeting of the stockholders of the
Corporation or any adjournment thereof.  In the absence of a
quorum at any meeting or any adjournment thereof, a majority in
voting interest of the stockholders present in person or by proxy
and entitled to vote thereat, in the absence therefrom of all the
stockholders, any officer entitled to preside at, or to act as
secretary of, such meeting may adjourn such meeting from time to
time.  At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present
any business may be transacted which might have been transacted
at the meeting as originally called.

SECTION 2.06  Voting.
(a) Each stockholder shall, at each meeting of the stockholders,
be entitled to vote in person or by proxy each share or
fractional share of the stock of the Corporation having voting
rights on the matter in question and which shall have been held
by him and registered in his name on the books of the
Corporation:

(i) on the date fixed pursuant to Section 6.05 of these Bylaws as
the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to
notice of and to vote at such meeting, or

(ii) if no such record date shall have been so fixed, then (a) at
the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which
notice of the meeting shall be given or (b) if notice of the
meeting shall be waived, at the close of business on the day next
preceding the day on which the meeting shall be held.

(b) Shares of its own stock belonging to the Corporation or to
another corporation, if a majority of the shares entitled to vote
in the election of directors in such other corporation is held,
directly or indirectly by the Corporation, shall neither be
entitled to vote nor be counted for quorum purposes.  Persons
holding stock of the Corporation in a fiduciary capacity shall be
entitled to vote such stock.  Persons whose stock is pledged
shall be entitled to vote, unless in the transfer by the pledgor
on the books of the Corporation he shall have expressly empowered
the pledgee to vote thereon, in which case only the pledgee, or
his proxy, may represent such stock and vote thereon.  Stock
having voting power standing of record in the names of two or
more persons, whether fiduciaries, members of a partnership,
joint tenants in common, tenants by entirety or otherwise or with
respect to which two or more persons have the same fiduciary
relationship, shall be voted in accordance with the provisions of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

(c) Any such voting rights may be exercised by the stockholder
entitled thereto in person or by his proxy appointed by an
instrument in writing, subscribed by such stockholder or by his
attorney thereunto authorized and delivered to the secretary of
the meeting; provided, however, that no proxy shall be voted or
acted upon after three years from its date unless said proxy
shall provide for a longer period.  The attendance at any meeting
of a stockholder who may theretofore have given a proxy shall not
have the effect of revoking the same unless he shall in writing
so notify the secretary of the meeting prior to the voting of the
proxy.  At any meeting of the stockholders all matters, except as
otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, in these
Bylaws or by law, shall be decided by the vote of a majority in
voting interest of the stockholders present in person or by proxy
and entitled to vote thereat and thereon, a quorum being present. 
The voting at any meeting of the stockholders on any question
need not be by ballot, unless so directed by the chairman of the
meeting.  On a vote by ballot each ballot shall be signed by the
stockholder voting, or by his proxy, if there be such proxy, and
it shall state the number of shares voted.

SECTION 2.07  List of Stockholders.  The Secretary of the
Corporation shall prepare and make, at least ten (10) days before
every meeting of stockholders, a complete list of the
stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting arranged in
alphabetical order, and showing the address of each stockholder
and the number of shares registered in the name of each
stockholder.  Such list shall be open to the examination of any
stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting during
ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten (1O) days
prior to the meeting, either at a place within the city where the
meeting is to be held, which place shall be specified in the
notice of the meeting, or, if not so specified, at the place
where the meeting is to be held.  The list shall also be produced
and kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole
time thereof, and may be inspected by any stockholder who is
present.

SECTION 2.08  Judges.  If at any meeting of the stockholders a
vote by written ballot shall be taken on any question, the
chairman of such meeting may appoint a judge or judges to act
with respect to such vote.  Each judge so appointed shall first
subscribe an oath faithfully to execute the duties of a judge at
such meeting with strict impartiality and according to the best
of his ability.  Such judges shall decide upon the qualification
of the voters and shall report the number of shares represented
at the meeting and entitled to vote on such question shall
conduct and accept the votes, and, when the voting is completed,
shall ascertain and report the number of shares voted
respectively for and against the question.  Reports of judges
shall be in writing and subscribed and delivered by them to the
Secretary of the Corporation.  The judges need not be
stockholders of the Corporation, and any officer of the
Corporation may be a judge on any question other than a vote for
or against a proposal in which he shall have a material interest.

SECTION 2.09  No Action Without Meeting.  No action may be taken
by stockholders except at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders.  No action may be taken by stockholders by written
consent.

SECTION 2.10.  Stockholder Proposals.  Only stockholders of
record shall be entitled to present a stockholder proposal at any
meeting of the stockholders.  Before a stockholder of record may
present such a proposal, the stockholder of record must deliver
timely notice of such proposal to the Company.  To be timely, a
stockholder of record's notice of a proposal to be presented at
an annual meeting shall be delivered to the Secretary at the
principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than
sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the first
anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting of
stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the date
of the annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days prior to or
more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date, notice by
the stockholder of record to be timely must be so delivered not
earlier than the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual
meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of
the sixtieth (60th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth
(10th) day following the date on which public announcement of the
date of such meeting is first made.  A stockholder of record's
notice of a proposal to be presented at a special meeting shall
be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices
of the Corporation not earlier than the ninetieth (90th) day
prior to such special meeting and not later than the close of
business on the later of the sixtieth (60th) day prior to such
special meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the date on
which public announcement of the date of such special meeting is
first made.

ARTICLE III

Board of Directors

SECTION 3.01  General Powers.  The property, business and affairs
of the Corporation shall be managed by the Board.

SECTION 3.02  Number and Term of Office.  The number of directors
shall be four (4).  Directors need not be stockholders.  Each of
the directors of the Corporation shall hold office until his
successor shall have been duly elected and shall qualify or until
he shall resign or shall have been removed in the manner
hereinafter provided.

SECTION 3.03  Election of Directors.  The directors shall be
elected annually by the stockholders of the Corporation and the
persons receiving the greatest number of votes, up to the number
of directors then to be elected, shall be the persons then
elected.  The election of directors is subject to any provisions
contained in the Certificate of Incorporation relating thereto,
including any provisions for a classified Board and for
cumulative voting.

SECTION 3.04  Resignations.  Any director of the Corporation may
resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board or to
the Secretary of the Corporation.  Any such resignation shall
take effect at the time specified therein, or, if the time be not
specified, it shall take effect immediately upon its receipt; and
unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such
resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

SECTION 3.05  Vacancies.  Except as otherwise provided in the
Certificate of Incorporation, any vacancy in the Board, whether
because of death, resignation, disqualification, an increase in
the number of directors, or any other cause, can be filled only
by a vote of the majority of the remaining directors, although
less than a quorum.  Subject to further Resolution of the Board
prescribing a shorter time, each director so chosen to fill a
vacancy shall hold office until his successor shall have been
elected and shall qualify or until he shall resign or shall have
been removed in the manner hereinafter provided.

SECTION 3.06  Place of Meeting, Etc.  The Board may hold any of
its meetings at such place or places within or without the State
of Delaware as the Board may from time to time by resolution
designate or as shall be designated by the person or persons
calling the meeting or in the notice or a waiver of notice of any
such meeting.  Directors may participate in any regular or
special meeting of the Board by means of conference telephone or
similar communications equipment pursuant to which all persons
participating in the meeting of the Board can hear each other,
and such participation shall constitute presence in person at
such meeting.

SECTION 3.07  First Meeting.  The Board shall meet as soon as
practicable after each annual election of directors and notice of
such first meeting shall not be required.

SECTION 3.08  Regular Meetings.  Regular meetings of the Board
may be held at such times as the Board shall from time to time by
resolution determine.  If any day fixed for a regular meeting
shall be a legal holiday at the place where the meeting is to be
held, then the meeting shall be held at the same hour and place
on the next succeeding business day not a legal holiday.  Except
as provided by law, notice of regular meetings need not be given.

SECTION 3.09  Special Meetings.  Special meetings of the Board
shall be held whenever called by the President or a majority of
the authorized number of directors.  Except as otherwise provided
by law or by these Bylaws, notice of the time and place of each
such special meeting shall be mailed to each director, addressed
to him at his residence or usual place of business, at least five
(5) days before the day on which the meeting is to be held, or
shall be sent to him at such place by telegraph or cable or be
delivered personally not less than forty-eight (48) hours before
the time at which the meeting is to be held.  Except where
otherwise required by law or by these Bylaws, notice of the
purpose of a special meeting need not be given.  Notice of any
meeting of the Board shall not be required to be given to any
director who is present at such meeting, except a director who
shall attend such meeting for the express purpose of objecting,
at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction of any
business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened.

SECTION 3.10  Quorum and Manner of Acting.  Except as otherwise
provided in these Bylaws or by law, the presence of a majority of
the authorized number of directors shall be required to
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any
meeting of the Board, and all matters shall be decided at any
such meeting, a quorum being present, by the affirmative votes of
a majority of the directors present.  In the absence of a quorum,
a majority of directors present at any meeting may adjourn the
same from time to time until a quorum shall be present.  Notice
of any adjourned meeting need not be given.  The directors shall
act only as a Board, and the individual directors shall have no
power as such.

SECTION 3.11  Action by Consent.  Any action required or
permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board or of any
committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if a written
consent thereto is signed by all members of the Board or of such
committee, as the case may be, and such written consent is filed
with the minutes of proceedings of the Board or committee.

SECTION 3.12  Removal of Directors.  Subject to the provisions of
the Certificate of Incorporation, a director may be removed only
with cause and by the affirmative vote of the stockholders
holding a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the
Corporation, given at a special meeting of the stockholders
called for the purpose.

SECTION 3.13  Compensation.  The directors shall receive only
such compensation for their services as directors as may be
allowed by resolution of the Board.  The Board may also provide
that the Corporation shall reimburse each such director for any
expense incurred by him on account of his attendance at any
meetings of the Board or Committees of the Board.  Neither the
payment of such compensation nor the reimbursement of such
expenses shall be construed to preclude any director from serving
the Corporation or its subsidiaries in any other capacity and
receiving compensation therefor.

SECTION 3.14  Committees.  The Board may, by resolution passed by
a majority of the whole Board, designate one or more committees,
each committee to consist of one or more of the directors of the
Corporation.  Any such committee, to the extent provided in the
resolution of the Board and except as otherwise limited by law,
shall have and may exercise all the powers and authority of the
Board in the management of the business and affairs of the
Corporation, and may authorize the seal of the Corporation to be
affixed to all papers which may require it.  Any such committee
shall keep written minutes of its meetings and report the same to
the Board at the next regular meeting of the Board.  In the
absence or disqualification of a member of a committee, the
member or members thereof present at any meeting and not
disqualified from voting, whether or not he or they constitute a
quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board to
act at the meeting in the place of any such absent or
disqualified member.

ARTICLE IV

Officers

SECTION 4.01  Number.  The officers of the Corporation shall be a
President, one or more Vice Presidents (the number thereof and
their respective titles to be determined by the Board), a
Secretary and a Treasurer.

SECTION 4.02  Election, Term of Office and Qualifications.  The
officers of the Corporation, except such officers as may be
appointed in accordance with Section 4.03, shall be elected
annually by the Board at the first meeting thereof held after the
election thereof.  Each officer shall hold office until his
successor shall have been duly chosen and shall qualify or until
his resignation or removal in the manner hereinafter provided.

SECTION 4.03  Assistants, Agents and Employees, Etc.  In addition
to the officers specified in Section 4.01, the Board may appoint
other assistants, agents and employees as it may deem necessary
or advisable, including one or more Assistant Secretaries, and
one or more Assistant Treasurers, each of whom shall hold office
for such period, have such authority, and perform such duties as
the Board may from time to time determine.  The Board may
delegate to any officer of the Corporation or any committee of
the Board the power to appoint, remove and prescribe the duties
of any such assistants, agents or employees.

SECTION 4.04  Removal.  Any officer, assistant, agent or employee
of the Corporation may be removed, with or without cause, at any
time: (i) in the case of an officer, assistant, agent or employee
appointed by the Board, only by resolution of the Board; and (ii)
in the case of an officer, assistant, agent or employee, by any
officer of the Corporation or committee of the Board upon whom or
which such power of removal may be conferred by the Board.

SECTION 4.05  Resignations.  Any officer or assistant may resign
at any time by giving written notice of his resignation to the
Board or the Secretary of the Corporation.  Any such resignation
shall take effect at the time specified therein or, if the time
be not specified, upon receipt thereof by the Board or the
Secretary, as the case may be; and, unless otherwise specified
therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be
necessary to make it effective.

SECTION 4.06  Vacancies.  A vacancy in any office because of
death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or other cause,
may be filled for the unexpired portion of the term thereof in
the manner prescribed in these Bylaws for regular appointments or
elections to such office.

SECTION 4.07  The President.  The President of the Corporation
shall be the chief executive officer of the Corporation and shall
have, subject to the control of the Board, general and active
supervision and management over the business of the Corporation
and over its several officers, assistants, agents and employees.

SECTION 4.08  The Vice Presidents.  Each Vice President shall
have such powers and perform such duties as the Board may from
time to time prescribe.  At the request of the President, or in
case of the President's absence or inability to act upon the
request of the Board, a Vice President shall perform the duties
of the President and when so acting, shall have all the powers
of, and be subject to all the restrictions upon, the President.

SECTION 4.09  The Secretary.  The Secretary shall, if present,
record the proceedings of all meetings of the Board, of the
stockholders, and of all committees of which a secretary shall
not have been appointed in one or more books provided for that
purpose; he shall see that all notices are duly given in
accordance with these Bylaws and as required by law; he shall be
custodian of the seal of the Corporation and shall affix and
attest the seal to all documents to be executed on behalf of the
Corporation under its seal; and, in general, he shall perform all
the duties incident to the office of Secretary and such other
duties as may from time to time be assigned to him by the Board.

SECTION 4.10  The Treasurer.  The Treasurer shall have the
general care and custody of the funds and securities of the
Corporation, and shall deposit all such funds in the name of the
Corporation in such banks, trust companies or other depositories
as shall be selected by the Board.  He shall receive, and give
receipts for, moneys due and payable to the Corporation from any
source whatsoever.  He shall exercise general supervision over
expenditures and disbursements made by officers, agents and
employees of the Corporation and the preparation of such records
and reports in connection therewith as may be necessary or
desirable.  He shall, in general, perform all other duties
incident to the office of Treasurer and such other duties as from
time to time may be assigned to him by the Board.

SECTION 4.11  Compensation.  The compensation of the officers of
the Corporation shall be fixed from time to time by the Board. 
None of such officers shall be prevented from receiving such
compensation by reason of the fact that he is also a director of
the Corporation.  Nothing contained herein shall preclude any
officer from serving the Corporation, or any subsidiary
corporation, in any other capacity and receiving such
compensation by reason of the fact that he is also a director of
the Corporation.  Nothing contained herein shall preclude any
officer from serving the Corporation, or any subsidiary
corporation, in any other capacity and receiving proper
compensation therefor.

ARTICLE V

Contracts, Checks, Drafts, Bank Accounts, Etc.

SECTION 5.01  Execution of Contracts.  The Board, except as in
these Bylaws otherwise provided, may authorize any officer or
officers, agent or agents, to enter into any contract or execute
any instrument in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation,
and such authority may be general or confined to specific
instances; and unless so authorized by the Board or by these
Bylaws, no officer, agent or employee shall have any power or
authority to bind the Corporation by any contract or engagement
or to pledge its credit or to render it liable for any purpose or
in any amount.

SECTION 5.02  Checks, Drafts, Etc.  All checks, drafts or other
orders for payment of money, notes or other evidence of
indebtedness, issued in the name of or payable to the
Corporation, shall be signed or endorsed by such person or
persons and in such manner as, from time to time, shall be
determined by resolution of the Board.  Each such officer,
assistant, agent or attorney shall give such bond, if any, as the
Board may require.

SECTION 5.03  Deposits.  All funds of the Corporation not
otherwise employed shall be deposited from time to time to the
credit of the Corporation in such banks, trust companies or other
depositories as the Board may select, or as may be selected by
any officer or officers, assistant or assistants, agent or
agents, or attorney or attorneys of the Corporation to whom such
power shall have been delegated by the Board.  For the purpose of
deposit and for the purpose of collection for the account of the
Corporation, the President, any Vice President or the Treasurer
(or any other officer or officers, assistant or assistants, agent
or agents, or attorney or attorneys of the Corporation who shall
from time to time be determined by the Board) may endorse, assign
and deliver checks, drafts and other orders for the payment of
money which are payable to the order of the Corporation.

SECTION 5.04  General and Special Bank Accounts.  The Board may
from time to time authorize the opening and keeping of general
and special bank accounts with such banks, trust companies or
other depositories as the Board may select or as may be selected
by any officer or officers, assistant or assistants, agent or
agents, or attorney or attorneys of the Corporation to whom such
power shall have been delegated by the Board.  The Board may make
such special rules and regulations with respect to such bank
accounts, not inconsistent with the provisions of these Bylaws,
as it may deem expedient.

ARTICLE VI

Shares and Their Transfer

SECTION 6.01  Certificates for Stock.  Every owner of stock of
the Corporation shall be entitled to have a certificate or
certificates, to be in such form as the Board shall prescribe,
certifying the number and class of shares of the stock of the
Corporation owned by him.  The certificates representing shares
of such stock shall be numbered in the order in which they shall
be issued and shall be signed in the name of the Corporation by
the President or a Vice President, and by the Secretary or an
Assistant Secretary or by the Treasurer or an Assistant
Treasurer.  Any of or all of the signatures on the certificates
may be a facsimile.  In case any officer, transfer agent or
registrar who has signed, or whose facsimile signature has been
placed upon, any such certificate, shall have ceased to be such
officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate is
issued, such certificate may nevertheless be issued by the
Corporation with the same effect as though the person who signed
such certificate, or whose facsimile signature shall have been
placed thereupon, were such officer, transfer agent or registrar
at the date of issue.  A record shall be kept of the respective
names of the persons, firms or corporations owning the stock
represented by such certificates, the number and class of shares
represented by such certificates, respectively, and the
respective dates thereof, and in case of cancellation, the
respective dates of cancellation.  Every certificate surrendered
to the Corporation for exchange or transfer shall be canceled,
and no new certificate or certificates shall be issued in
exchange for any existing certificate until such existing
certificate shall have been so canceled, except in cases provided
for in Section 6.04.

SECTION 6.02  Transfers of Stock.  Transfers of shares of stock
of the Corporation shall be made only on the books of the
Corporation by the registered holder thereof, or by his attorney
thereunto authorized by power of attorney duly executed and filed
with the Secretary, or with a transfer clerk or a transfer agent
appointed as provided in Section 6.03, and upon surrender of the
certificate or certificates for such shares properly endorsed and
the payment of all taxes thereon.  The person in whose name
shares of stock stand on the books of the Corporation shall be
deemed the owner thereof for all purposes as regards the
Corporation.  Whenever any transfer of shares shall be made for
collateral security, and not absolutely, such fact shall be so
expressed in the entry of transfer if, when the certificate or
certificates shall be presented to the Corporation for transfer,
both the transferor and the transferee request the Corporation to
do so.

SECTION 6.03  Regulations.  The Board may make such rules and
regulations as it may deem expedient, not inconsistent with these
Bylaws, concerning the issue, transfer and registration of
certificates for shares of the stock of the Corporation.  It may
appoint, or authorize any officer or officers to appoint, one or
more transfer clerks or one or more transfer agents and one or
more registrars, and may require all certificates for stock to
bear the signature or signatures of any of them.

SECTION 6.04  Lost, Stolen, Destroyed, and Mutilated
Certificates.  In any case of loss, theft, destruction, or
mutilation of any certificate of stock, another may be issued in
its place upon proof of such loss, theft, destruction, or
mutilation and upon the giving of a bond of indemnity to the
Corporation in such form and in such sum as the Board may direct;
provided, however, that a new certificate may be issued without
requiring any bond when, in the judgment of the Board, it is
proper so to do.

SECTION 6.05  Fixing Date for Determination of Stockholders of
Record.  In order that the Corporation may determine the
stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of
stockholders or any adjournment thereof, or to express consent to
corporate action in writing without a meeting, or entitled to
receive payment of any dividend or other distribution or
allotment of any rights, or entitled to exercise any rights in
respect of any other change, conversion or exchange of stock or
for the purpose of any other lawful action, the Board may fix, in
advance, a record date, which shall not be more than sixty (60)
nor less than ten (10) days before the date of such meeting, nor
more than sixty (60) days prior to any other action.  If in any
case involving the determination of stockholders for any purpose
other than notice of or voting at a meeting of stockholders or
expressing consent to corporate action without a meeting the
Board shall not fix such a record date, the record date for
determining stockholders for such purpose shall be the close of
business on the day on which the Board shall adopt the resolution
relating thereto.  A determination of stockholders entitled to
notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to
any adjournment of such meeting; provided, however, that the
Board may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting.

ARTICLE VII

Indemnification

SECTION 7.01  Actions, Etc. Other Than by or in the Right of the
Corporation.  Any person who was or is a party or is threatened
to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed
action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil,
criminal, administrative, and whether external or internal - to
the Corporation (other than an action by or in the right of the
Corporation), by reason of the fact that he is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or, while serving
as a director or officer, is or was serving at the request of the
Corporation as a director, officer, employee, trustee or agent of
the Corporation or another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with
respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such
proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a
director, officer, trustee, employee or agent or in any other
capacity, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the
Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by law, including,
but not limited to, the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the
same exists or may thereafter be amended (but, in the case of any
such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits
the Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights than
said Law permitted the Corporation to provide prior to such
amendment), against all expenses (including attorneys' fees),
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit
or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests
of the Corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was
unlawful.  The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by
judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo
contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a
presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a
manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any
criminal action or proceeding, that he had reasonable cause to
believe that his conduct was unlawful.

SECTION 7.02  Actions, Etc. by or in the Right of the
Corporation.  Any person who was or is a party or is threatened
to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed
judicial action or suit by or in the right of the Corporation to
procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is
or was a director or officer, employee or agent of the
Corporation, or, while serving as a director or officer, is or
was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director,
officer, employee, trustee or agent of the Corporation or another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit
plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in
an official capacity as a director, officer, trustee, employee or
agent or in any other capacity, shall be indemnified and held
harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by
law, including, but not limited to, the Delaware General
Corporation Law, as the same exists or may thereafter be amended
(but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that
such amendment permits the Corporation to provide broader
indemnification rights than said Law permitted the Corporation to
provide prior to such amendment), against all expenses (including
attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit
if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed
to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation,
and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of
any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have
been adjudged to be liable to the Corporation unless and only to
the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such
action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that,
despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of
Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.

SECTION 7.03  Determination of Right of Indemnification.  Any
indemnification under Section 7.01 or 7.02 (unless ordered by a
court) shall be made by the Corporation only as authorized in the
specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the
director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the
circumstances because he has met the applicable standard of
conduct set forth in Section 7.01 and 7.02.  Such determination
shall be made (i) by the Board by a majority vote of a quorum
consisting of directors who were not parties to such action, suit
or proceeding, or (ii) if such a quorum is not obtainable, or,
even if obtainable a quorum of disinterested directors so
directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or
(iii) by the stockholders.

SECTION 7.04  Indemnification Against Expenses of Successful
Party.  Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article, to
the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of the
Corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in
defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in Section
7.01 or 7.02, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter
therein, he shall be indemnified against all expenses (including
attorneys' fees) incurred by him in connection therewith.

SECTION 7.05  Prepaid Expenses.  Expenses incurred by an officer
or director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or
proceeding shall be paid by the Corporation in advance of the
final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt
of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to
repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is
not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized
in this Article.  Such expenses incurred by other employees and
agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as
the Board deems appropriate.

SECTION 7.06  Right to Indemnification Upon Application;
Procedure Upon Application.  Any indemnification under or
advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this
Article shall be made promptly, and in any event within ninety
days, upon written request of the director or officer, employee
or agent, unless with respect to applications under Section 7.02
and 7.03, a determination is reasonably and promptly made by the
Board by a majority vote of quorum of disinterested directors
that such director or officer, employee or agent acted in a
manner set forth in such Sections as to justify the Corporation's
not indemnifying the director or officer, employee or agent.  In
the event no quorum of disinterested directors is obtainable, the
Board shall promptly direct that independent legal counsel shall
decide whether the director or officer, employee or agent acted
in a manner set forth in such Sections as to justify the
Corporations not indemnifying or making an advance to the
director or officer or, in the case of indemnification, employee
or agent.  The right to indemnification under or advancement of
expenses provided by this Article shall be enforceable by the
director, officer, employee or agent in any court of competent
jurisdiction, if the Board or independent legal counsel denies
the claim, in whole or in part, or if no disposition of such
claim is made within ninety days.  The director's, officer's,
employee's or agent's expenses incurred in connection with
successfully establishing his right to indemnification or
advancement of expenses, in whole or in part, in any such
proceeding shall also be indemnified by the Corporation.

SECTION 7.07  Other Rights and Remedies.  The indemnification
under and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted
pursuant to, this Article shall not be deemed exclusive of any
other rights to which those seeking indemnification or
advancement of expenses may be entitled under any Bylaws,
agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or
otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to
action in another capacity while holding such office, and shall
continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer,
employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs,
executors and administrators of such a person.  The right to be
indemnified or to the reimbursement or advancement of expenses
pursuant hereto (i) is a contract right based upon good and
valuable consideration, pursuant to which the person entitled
thereto may bring suit as if the provisions hereof were set forth
in a separate written contract between the Corporation and the
director or officer, employee or agent, (ii) is intended to be
retroactive and shall be available with respect to events
occurring prior to the adoption hereof, and (iii) shall continue
to exist after the rescission or restrictive modification hereof
with respect to events occurring prior thereto.

SECTION 7.08  Insurance.  Upon resolution passed by the Board,
the Corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of
any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent
of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the
Corporation, as a director, officer, employee, trustee or agent
of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise against any liability asserted against him and
incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his
status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the
power to indemnify him against such liability under the
provisions of this Article.

SECTION 7.09  Constituent Corporations.  For the purposes of this
Article, references to "the Corporation" include any constituent
corporations absorbed in a consolidation or merger as well as the
resulting or surviving corporation, so that any person who is or
was a director, officer, employee, trustee or agent of such a
constituent corporation or is or was serving at the request of
such constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee,
trustee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise shall stand in the same
position under the provisions of this Article with respect to the
resulting or surviving corporation as he would if he had served
the resulting or surviving corporation in the same capacity.

SECTION 7.10  Other Enterprises, Fines, and Serving at
Corporation's Request.  For purposes of this Article, references
to "other enterprises" shall include employee benefit plan;
references to "fines" shall include any excise taxes assessed on
a person with respect to any employee benefit plan; and
references to "serving at the request of the Corporation" shall
include any service as a director, officer, employee, trustee or
agent of the corporation which imposes duties on, or involves
services by, such director, officer, employee, trustee or agent
with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants, or
beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good faith and in a
manner he reasonably believed to be in the interest of the
participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall
be deemed to have acted in a manner "not opposed to the best
interests of the Corporation" as referred to in this Article.

SECTION 7.11  Savings Clause.  If this Article or any portion
thereof shall be invalidated on any ground by any court of
competent jurisdiction, then the Corporation shall nevertheless
indemnify each director, officer, employee or agent as to
expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement with respect to any action, suit,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal or
administrative, and whether internal or external, including a
grand jury proceeding and an action or suit brought by or in the
right of the Corporation, to the full extent permitted by any
applicable portion of this Article that shall not have been
invalidated or by any other applicable law.

SECTION 7.12  Liability of Directors for Breaches of Fiduciary
Duty.  Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in
these Bylaws, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware
General Corporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be
amended, a director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the
Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director.

ARTICLE VIII

Miscellaneous

SECTION 8.01  Seal.  The Board shall provide a corporate seal,
which shall be in the form of a circle and shall bear the name of
the Corporation and words and figures showing that the
Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware and the
year of incorporation.

SECTION 8.02  Waiver of Notices.  Whenever notice is required to
be given by these Bylaws or the Certificate of Incorporation or
by law, the person entitled to said notice may waive such notice
in writing, either before or after the time stated therein, and
such waiver shall be deemed equivalent to notice.

SECTION 8.03  Amendments.  Notwithstanding any provision herein
to the contrary, these Bylaws, or any of them, may be altered,
amended or repealed, and new Bylaws may be made only (i) by the
Board, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the number of the
Board; or (ii) by the stockholders, by an affirmative vote of the
stockholders holding a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of the Corporation given at any annual meeting or special
meeting of the stockholders, provided that notice of such
proposed amendment, modification, repeal or adoption is timely
given in the manner hereinabove provided.  Any Bylaws made or
altered by the stockholders may be altered or repealed by either
the Board or the stockholders.


EXHIBIT 10-AM                PAYOFF AGREEMENT

          THIS PAYOFF AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of
this 29th day of December, 1994, by and among SANWA BANK
CALIFORNIA, a California corporation ("Sanwa"), and DDL
ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as DATA
DESIGN LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware corporation) ("DDL"),
AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP., an Oregon corporation ("Aero-Or"),
AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP., a California corporation ("Aero-Cal"), A.J.
ELECTRONICS, INC., a California corporation ("A.J."), DDL EUROPE
LIMITED ("DDL-E"), DDL ELECTRONICS LIMITED ("DDL-Ltd."), and
IRLANDUS CIRCUITS LIMITED ("Irlandus") (Aero-Or, Aero-Cal, A.J.,
DDL-E, DDL-Ltd., and Irlandus are collectively referred to herein
as the "DDL Affiliates").  Terms not otherwise defined in this
Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in that
certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 5,
1992 between Sanwa and DDL (the "Credit Agreement").


                                 RECITALS

A.   DDL and Sanwa entered into that certain Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 (the "Credit
Agreement").

B.   To secure DDL's obligations under the Credit Agreement, DDL
and the DDL Affiliates executed certain General Security
Agreements dated as of June 5, 1992 in favor of Sanwa, and the
DDL Affiliates executed certain Continuing Guaranties dated as of
June 5, 1992 in favor of Sanwa.

C.   Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, DDL is
indebted to Sanwa in the principal sum of $6,847,519.59 plus
accrued but unpaid interest, costs and expenses, together with
the other obligations set forth in the Credit Agreement
(collectively, the "Outstanding Debt").

D.   DDL has experienced certain operating difficulties, which it
is currently attempting to resolve, but which make DDL unable to
comply with certain provisions of the Credit Agreement.

E.   DDL has requested Sanwa to accept, and Sanwa has agreed to
accept, the sum of $4,500,000.00 in full and complete
satisfaction of the Outstanding Debt.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the
mutual covenants contained herein, Sanwa, DDL and the DDL
Affiliates hereby agree as follows:

                                    I.
                      AGREEMENT FOR PART PERFORMANCE

          Sanwa hereby accepts payment of the sum of Four Million
Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($4,500,000.00) from DDL in full
and complete satisfaction of the Outstanding Debt.

                                    II.
                RELEASE OF LIENS: TERMINATION OF AGREEMENTS

     2.1  Release of Liens.  Sanwa hereby releases any and all
liens, encumbrances and other security interests (collectively,
the "Security Interests") it may hold in the Collateral and Real
Property Collateral of DDL and/or the DDL Affiliates.  
Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Sanwa shall
deliver or cause to be delivered to DDL, in form and substance
satisfactory to DDL and Sanwa, such statements terminating the
Security Interests, and such other documents as DDL may
reasonably deem necessary to assure itself that the Security
Interests have been released and terminated, including, without
limitation, the statements and documents identified on Exhibit 1
of this Agreement.

     2.2  Termination of Agreements.  The parties hereto agree
that all outstanding agreements and understandings between Sanwa
and DDL and/or the DDL Affiliates, other than this Agreement, are
hereby terminated and all obligations thereunder are completely
satisfied and released.  Such agreements and understandings
include, without limitation, those identified on Exhibit 2 of
this Agreement.

     2.3  Further Assurances.  At DDL's and/or the DDL
Affiliates' sole expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
each party to this Agreement shall cooperate fully in the
execution of any and all other documents and in the completion of
any additional actions that may be necessary or appropriate to
give full force and effect to the terms and intent of this
Agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to DDL and Sanwa,
including, without limitation, execution of all documents
necessary or appropriate to release Sanwa's Security Interest in
Collateral and/or Real Property Collateral located in Northern
Ireland.

                                   III.
                              MUTUAL RELEASE

     3.1  Release.  In consideration of this Agreement and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, DDL and the DDL Affiliates, on one
hand, and Sanwa, on the other, hereby and forever mutually
release and discharge one another and each of the other's
successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, parent companies,
employees, former employees, consultants, owners, officers,
directors, shareholders, general partners, limited partners,
predecessors, assigns, agents, attorneys, insurers, and
representatives from any and all causes of action, actions,
judgments, liens, indebtedness, damages, losses, claims,
liabilities, and demands of any nature whatsoever, known or
unknown, absolute or contingent, related or incidental to the
Outstanding Debt other than the obligations set forth in this
Agreement.

     3.2  Release of Unknown Claims.  It is the intention of the
parties in executing this Agreement that this Agreement shall be
effective as a bar to each and every claim, demand, and cause of
action that the parties may have against one another related or
incidental to the Outstanding Debt other than the obligations set
forth in this Agreement.  In furtherance of this intention, the
parties hereby expressly waive any and all rights or benefits
conferred by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California
Civil Code, and by any similar provision of California or Federal
law now in effect or in effect in the future, and expressly
consent that this Agreement shall be given full force and effect
according to each and all of its express terms and conditions,
including those relating to unknown and unsuspected claims,
demands, and causes of action, if any:

          A general release does not extend to claims which
     the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his
     favor at the time of executing the release, which if
     known by him must have materially affected his settlement
     with the debtor.

          The parties acknowledge that they may hereafter
discover claims or facts in addition to or different from those
which they now know or believe to exist with respect to the
subject matter of this Agreement and which, if known or suspected
at the time of executing this Agreement, may have materially
affected this settlement.  Nevertheless, the parties hereby waive
any rights, claims, or causes of action that might arise as a
result of such different or additional claims or facts.  The
parties acknowledge that they understand the significance and
potential consequence of such a release of unknown claims and of
the specific waiver of their rights under Section 1542.  The
parties intend that the claims released by them under this
Agreement be construed as broadly as possible.

                                    IV.
                               MISCELLANEOUS

     4.1  Binding Effect.  This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of DDL, the DDL Affiliates and Sanwa and
their respective successors and assigns.

     4.2  Governing Law: Waiver of Trial by Jury.  This Agreement
shall be governed by and interpreted and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.  The parties hereto
consent to the jurisdiction of any state or federal court located
within Los Angeles County of the State of California. The parties
hereto waive the right to trial by jury in any action, suit,
proceeding or counterclaim of any kind arising out of or related
to this Agreement.

     4.3  Recitals.  All of the recitals are incorporated herein
and made a part hereof.

     4.4  Warranty of Authorization.  Each person whose signature
appears hereon warrants and guarantees that he or she has been
duly authorized and has full authority to execute this Agreement
on behalf of the entity on whose behalf this Agreement is
executed.

     4.5  Entire Agreement.  This Agreement constitutes and
contains the entire agreement and understanding between the
parties. This Agreement supersedes and replaces all prior
negotiations and all agreements, proposed or otherwise, whether
written or oral, concerning the subject matter hereof.  This is a
fully integrated document.  In executing this Agreement, no party
hereto has relied on any representation not contained within this
document.  Each party hereto has been represented by counsel and
has relied solely on its counsel's advice as to the legal effect
hereof and its own knowledge and the terms of this document.

     4.6  Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all
of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.

     4.7  Attorneys' Fees and Costs.  In the event of litigation
in connection with or concerning the subject matter of this
Agreement or any breach of this Agreement, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incurred by
that party, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in
addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.  The
parties further agree that the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees and
costs, of collecting any costs and expenses awarded pursuant to
the prior sentence.

     4.8  Headings.  The headings set forth herein are solely for
the purpose of identification and have no legal significance.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the date
first written above.

SANWA BANK CALIFORNIA, a California corporation



By:________________________________
Its:_______________________________


DDL ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation



By:______________________________
Its: ____________________________


AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP., an Oregon corporation



By:_______________________________
its:______________________________    


AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP, a California
corporation



By:_______________________________
Its:______________________________  


A.J. ELECTRONICS, INC., a California corporation  


By:_______________________________
Its:______________________________  


DDL EUROPE LIMITED


By:__________________________________
Its:_________________________________



DDL ELECTRONICS, LTD. 



By:__________________________________
Its:_________________________________



<PAGE>
IRLANDUS CIRCUITS LIMITED




By:__________________________________
Its:_________________________________

EXHIBIT 1 TO PAYOFF AGREEMENT
Release of Liens



1.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by    
DDL to First American Title Insurance Company ("First    
American") for the benefit of Sanwa, The Tokai Bank Ltd. 
("Tokai") and First Interstate Bank of Oregon ("FIB") with    
respect to that property commonly known as 223 North Crescent    
Way, Anaheim, California;

2.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,     
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by     
A.J. to First American for the benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB    
with respect to that property commonly known as 20945 Plummer
Street, Chatsworth, California;

3.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,   
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by     
DDL to First American for the benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB     
with respect to that property commonly known as 7915 Center    
Avenue, Cucamonga, California;

4.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by     
DDL to First American for the benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with     
respect to that property known as Lot 11, Tract 11428, in the     
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California;

5.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by     
DDL to First American for the benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with     
respect to that property known as Lot 13, Tract 11428, in the     
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California;

6.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL
to Fidelity National Title Insurance Company for the benefit of
Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property commonly known
as 21423 North 11th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona; 

7.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by
Aero-Or to First American for the benefit of Sanwa with respect
to that property commonly known as 1270 NW 167th Place,
Beaverton, Oregon;

8.   Deed of Release among Irlandus, FIB, Tokai and Sanwa with
respect to that property located in Northern Ireland;

9.   Deed of Release among DDL, FIB, Tokai and Sanwa with respect
to that property located in Northern Ireland;

10.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of DDL under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Oregon Secretary
of State on June 23, 1992 as file number R12780;

11.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of Aero-Cal under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the California
Secretary of State on June 22, 1992 as file number 92134431;

12.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of Aero-Or under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Oregon Secretary
of State on June 23, 1992 as file number R12781;

13.  Form UCC-2 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of A.J. under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the California
Secretary of State on June 22, 1992 as file number 92134433;

14.  Form UCC-2 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of DDL under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the California
Secretary of State on June 22, 1992 as file number 92134429;

15.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of DDL under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Delaware Secretary
of State on June 23, 1992 as file number 9207522;

16.  Notice of Assignment of Promissory Note to Omni Acquisition 
Corp.;

17.  Notice of Assignment of Promissory Note and Deed of Trust to
M. Peter Thomas and Lisa Thomas;

18.  Notice of Assignment of Promissory Note and Deed of Trust to
Thomas J. Gullo and Linda G. Gullo;

19.  Assignment of Deed of Trust (as collateral), assigning all  
beneficial interest under that certain Second Deed of Trust and
Assignment of Rents with Request for Notice dated May 10, 1990
executed by M. Peter Thomas and Lisa Thomas recorded as
Instrument No. 90-286466 and further recorded as Instrument No.
90-375203.

20.  Assignment of Deed of Trust (as collateral), assigning all  
beneficial interest under that certain Second Deed of Trust and
Assignment of Rents with Request for Notice dated May 30, 1990
executed by Thomas J. Gullo and Linda C. Gullo recorded as
Instrument No. 90-314878 and further recorded as Instrument No.
90-372668.

21.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by A.J. to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property
commonly known as 20945 Plummer Street, Chatsworth, California;

22.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property
commonly known as 7915 Center Avenue, Cucamonga, California;

23.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with respect to that property known as
Lot 11, Tract 11428, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California;

24.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with respect to that property known as
Lot 13, Tract 11428, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California;

25.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by Aero-Or to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa with respect to that property commonly known as
1270 NW 167th Place, Beaverton, Oregon;

26.  Original Second Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents with
Request for Notice dated May 10, 1990 executed by M. Peter Thomas
and Lisa Thomas recorded as Instrument No. 90-286466 and further
recorded as Instrument No. 90-375203;

27.  Original Second Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents with 
Request for Notice dated May 30, 1990 executed by Thomas J.  
Gullo and Linda G. Gullo recorded as Instrument No. 90-314878    
and further recorded as Instrument No. 90-372668;

28.  Original Promissory Note Secured by Second Deed of Trust
dated May 10, 1990 in the principal amount of $560,000 executed
by M. Peter Thomas and Lisa Thomas;

29.  Original Promissory Note Secured by Second Deed of Trust
dated May 30, 1990 in the principal amount of $250,000 executed
by Thomas J. Gullo and Linda C. Gullo;

30.  Original Promissory Note dated February 28, 1992 in the
principal amount of $292,536.36 executed by Omni Acquisition
Corp.


                                EXHIBIT 2
                                   TO
                            PAYOFF AGREEMENT
                        Termination of Agreements



1.   The Credit Agreement;

2.   Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by
DDL in favor of Sanwa, Tokai and First Interstate Bank of Oregon,
N.A. ("FIB");

3.   General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by DDL
in favor of Sanwa;

4.   General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by Aero-
Or in favor of Sanwa;

5.   General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by
AeroCal in favor of Sanwa;

6.   General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by A.J.
in favor of Sanwa;

7.   Continuing Guaranty dated as of June 5, 1992 by Aero-Or in  
favor of Sanwa;

8.   Continuing Guaranty dated as of June 5, 1992 by Aero-Cal in 
favor of Sanwa; and

9.   Continuing Guaranty dated as of June 5, 1992 by A.J. in
favor of Sanwa.

EXHIBIT 10-AN              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

          THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made
as of the 29th day of December, 1994, by and among FIRST
INTERSTATE BANK OF OREGON, N.A., TRUSTEE ("FIB"), THE TOKAI BANK,
LTD., LOS ANGELES AGENCY ("Tokai"), AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP., an
Oregon corporation ("Aero-Or"), DDL ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (formerly known as DATA DESIGN LABORATORIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation) ("DDL"), AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP., a California
corporation ("Aero-Cal"), A.J. ELECTRONICS, INC., a California
corporation ("A.J."), DDL EUROPE LIMITED ("DDL-E"), DDL
ELECTRONICS LIMITED ("DDL-Ltd."), and IRLANDUS CIRCUITS LIMITED
("Irlandus") (DDL, Aero-Cal, A.J., DDL-E, DDL-Ltd., and Irlandus
are collectively referred to herein as the "Aero-Or Affiliates").
Terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in that certain Indenture of Trust
dated as of May 1, 1986 among the State of Oregon acting through
the Economic Development Commission (the "Issuer"), FIB and
Aero-Or.


                                 RECITALS

     A.   Issuer issued Adjustable Tender Economic Development
Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds"), and loaned certain proceeds from the
sale of the Bonds to Aero-Or pursuant to that certain Indenture
of Trust dated as of May 1, 1986 (the "Indenture") among the
Issuer, Aero-Or and FIB, as trustee, and that certain Loan
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1986 (the "Loan Agreement") between
Issuer and Aero-Or.

     B.   For repayment of the loan made by Issuer to Aero-Or,
Aero-Or agreed to pay to FIB, for the account of Issuer, an
amount equal to the principal amount of the Bonds together with
interest in the amount set forth in the Loan Agreement.  Said
repayment is secured by certain trust deeds, security agreements,
and guaranties executed by Aero-Or and the Aero-Or Affiliates.

     C.   Pursuant to a certain Reimbursement Agreement dated as
of May 1, 1986, as amended (the "Reimbursement Agreement"),
between Tokai and Aero-Or, Tokai issued a letter of credit dated
as of May 16, 1986, as amended (the "Letter of Credit"), for the
benefit of FIB as security for repayment of the Bonds.

     D.   Aero-Or is also the guarantor of certain credit
facilities extended by Sanwa Bank California ("Sanwa") to DDL.
DDL, Sanwa and FIB have entered into that certain Intercreditor
Agreement dated on or about June 5, 1992 (the "Intercreditor").

     E.   As of the date of this Agreement, Aero-Or has caused a
defeasance of the Bonds pursuant to Section 8.01 of the Indenture
(the "Defeasance"), by delivering to FIB (i) irrevocable
instructions from Aero-Or for redemption of the Bonds on February
1, 1995; (ii) irrevocable instructions from the Issuer for
redemption of the Bonds on February 1, 1995; (iii) the sum of
$5,387,820.27, which constitutes all principal and interest due
and payable, and thereafter to become due and payable, on the
Bonds; and (iii) an unqualified opinion of nationally recognized
bankruptcy counsel (which opinion is acceptable to Moody's
Investors Service, Inc.) that payment of such moneys does not
constitute an avoidable preference under Section 547 of the
Federal Bankruptcy Code, in satisfaction of the Indenture's
Available Moneys requirement.

     F.   In connection with the Defeasance, FIB has delivered
the original Letter of Credit to Tokai for cancellation,
accompanied by a permanent reduction certificate and letter
certificate of cancellation in form and content satisfactory to
Tokai, and FIB, Tokai and Sanwa have entered into a termination
letter with respect to the Intercreditor Agreement.

     G.   As of the date of this Agreement, Aero-Or has caused to
be paid to Tokai and FIB all of their fees and costs, including
trustee's and attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in connection
with the Bonds but separate and apart from the negotiation and
preparation of documents pertaining to the Defeasance, including,
without limitation, the following:  (a) $14,131.26 as letter of
credit fees due and payable to Tokai; (b) 5,082.25 Pounds
Sterling for fees and costs of Irish counsel; and (c) other
attorneys fees and costs through October 31, 1994 in the amount
of $22,739.47.

     H.   As of the date of this Agreement, Aero-Or has caused to
be paid to FIB and Tokai all of FIB's and Tokai's reasonable fees
and expenses, including without limitation attorneys' fees,
incurred in connection with the Defeasance.

     I.   The parties to this Agreement agree and acknowledge
that the Defeasance constitutes full and complete satisfaction of
all obligations arising out of or related to the Bonds.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals
and of the mutual covenants contained herein, Tokai, FIB,
Aero-Or, and the Aero-Or Affiliates hereby agree as follows:

                                    I.
                RELEASE OF LIENS; TERMINATION OF AGREEMENTS

     1.1  Release of Liens.  In consideration of the Defeasance
and receipt of the funds and documents described in the above
recitals, FIB and Tokai hereby release any and all liens,
encumbrances and other security interests (collectively, the
"Security Interests") it may hold in the property of Aero-Or
and/or the Aero-Or Affiliates.  Concurrently with the execution
of this Agreement, FIB and Tokai shall deliver or cause to be
delivered to Aero-Or, in form and substance satisfactory to
Aero-Or, FIB and Tokai, such statements terminating the Security
Interests, and such other documents as Aero-Or may reasonably
deem necessary to assure itself that the Security Interests have
been released and terminated, including, without limitation, the
statements and documents identified on Exhibit 1 of this
Agreement.

     1.2  Termination of Agreements.  Except as set forth below,
the parties hereto agree that all outstanding agreements and
understandings between FIB, Tokai, Aero-Or and/or the Aero-Or
Affiliates in any way arising out of or related to the Bonds,
other than this Agreement, are hereby terminated and all
obligations thereunder are completely satisfied and released.
Such agreements and understandings include, without limitation,
those identified on Exhibit 2 of this Agreement.  Notwithstanding
the foregoing, all indemnities, representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements as to environmental issues, covenants
and liability pertaining to any collateral granted by Aero-Or
and/or any Aero-Or Affiliate to Tokai and/or FIB shall remain in
full force and effect and be fully enforceable against such
entities.

     1.3  Further Assurances.  At Aero-Or's and/or the Aero-Or
Affiliates' sole expense, including without limitation reasonable
attorneys' fees, each party to this Agreement shall cooperate
fully in the execution of any and all other documents and in the
completion of any additional actions that may be necessary or
appropriate to give full force and effect to the terms and intent
of this Agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to Aero-Or,
Tokai and FIB, including, without limitation, execution of all
documents necessary or appropriate to release FIB's and Tokai's
Security Interest in Aero-Or's and/or the Aero-Or Affiliates'
property located in Northern Ireland.

                                    II.
                              MUTUAL RELEASE

     2.1  Release.  In consideration of this Agreement and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, Aero-Or and the Aero-Or Affiliates,
on one hand, and FIB and Tokai, on the other, hereby and forever
mutually release and discharge one another and each of the
other's successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, parent companies,
employees, former employees, consultants, owners, officers,
directors, shareholders, general partners, limited partners,
predecessors, assigns, agents, attorneys, insurers, and
representatives from any and all causes of action, actions,
judgments, liens, indebtedness, damages, losses, claims,
liabilities, and demands of any nature whatsoever, known or
unknown, absolute or contingent, related or incidental to the
Bonds, other than the obligations set forth in this Agreement and
any and all indemnification granted in favor of FIB and/or Tokai
or liability of Aero-Or and/or any of the Aero-Or Affiliates with
respect to environmental issues or concerns relating to the
property commonly known as 1270 NW 167th Place, Beaverton, Oregon
(the "Property") and/or any of the other collateral granted by
Aero-Or and/or the Aero-Or Affiliates to Tokai and/or FIB.

     2.2  Release of Unknown Claims.  It is the intention of the
parties in executing this Agreement that this Agreement shall be
effective as a bar to each and every claim, demand, and cause of
action that the parties may have against one another related or
incidental to the Bonds, other than the obligations set forth in
this Agreement and any indemnification granted in favor of FIB
and/or Tokai with respect to environmental issues or concerns
relating to the Property.  In furtherance of this intention, the
parties hereby expressly waive any and all rights or benefits
conferred by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California
Civil Code, and by any similar provision of California or Federal
law now in effect or in effect in the future, and expressly
consent that this Agreement shall be given full force and effect
according to each and all of its express terms and conditions,
including those relating to unknown and unsuspected claims,
demands, and causes of action, if any:

     A general release does not extend to claims which the
     creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor
     at the time of executing the release, which if known by
     him must have materially affected his settlement with the
     debtor.

          The parties acknowledge that they may hereafter
discover claims or facts in addition to or different from those
which they now know or believe to exist with respect to the
subject matter of this Agreement and which, if known or suspected
at the time of executing this Agreement, may have materially
affected this settlement.  Nevertheless, the parties hereby waive
any rights, claims, or causes of action that might arise as a
result of such different or additional claims or facts.  The
parties acknowledge that they understand the significance and
potential consequence of such a release of unknown claims and of
the specific waiver of their rights under Section 1542.  The
parties intend that the claims released by them under this
Agreement be construed as broadly as possible.

                                   III.
                               MISCELLANEOUS

     3.1  Binding Effect.  This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of Aero-Or, the Aero-Or Affiliates, FIB,
and Tokai and their respective successors and assigns.

     3.2  Governing Law: Waiver of Trial by Jury.  This Agreement
shall be governed by and interpreted and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.  The parties hereto
consent to the jurisdiction of any state or federal court located
within Los Angeles County of the State of California.  The
parties hereto waive the right to trial by jury in any action,
suit, proceeding or counterclaim of any kind arising out of or
related to this Agreement.

     3.3  Recitals.  All of the recitals are incorporated herein
and made a part hereof and all parties acknowledge and agree that
the recitals are true and correct.

     3.4  Warranty of Authorization.  Each person whose signature
appears hereon warrants and guarantees that he or she has been
duly authorized and has full authority to execute this Agreement
on behalf of the entity on whose behalf this Agreement is
executed.

     3.5  Entire Agreement.  This Agreement constitutes and
contains the entire agreement and understanding between the
parties.  This Agreement supersedes and replaces all prior
negotiations and all agreements, proposed or otherwise, whether
written or oral, concerning the subject matter hereof.  This is a
fully integrated document.  In executing this Agreement, no party
hereto has relied on any representation not contained within this
document.   Each party hereto has been represented by counsel and
has relied solely on its counsel's advice as to the legal effect
hereof and its own knowledge and the terms of this document.

     3.6  Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all
of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.

     3.7  Attorneys' Fees and Costs.  In the event of litigation
in connection with or concerning the subject matter of this
Agreement or any breach of this Agreement, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incurred by
that party, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in
addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.  The
parties further agree that the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover all costs, including without limitation reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs whether incurred before trial, at trial
or in any appeal or bankruptcy proceeding, of collecting any
costs and expenses awarded pursuant to the prior sentence.

     3.8  Headings.  The headings set forth herein are solely for
the purpose of identification and have no legal significance.

     3.9  Fiduciary Capacity of FIB.  FIB executes this Agreement
solely in its fiduciary capacity as Trustee under the Indenture
and related documents.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the date
first written above

FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF OREGON, N.A., TRUSTEE



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


THE TOKAI BANK, LTD., LOS ANGELES - AGENCY



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP., an Oregon
corporation



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________

DDL ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________

AEROSCIENTIFIC CORP. a California
corporation     -



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


A.J. ELECTRONICS, INC., a
California corporation




By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


DDL EUROPE LIMITED





By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


DDL ELECTRONICS LIMITED



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


IRLANDUS CIRCUITS LIMITED



By:______________________________
Its:______________________________


                                 EXHIBIT 1
                                    TO
                           TERMINATION AGREEMENT
                             Release of Liens



1.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL
to First American Title Insurance Company ("First American") for
the benefit of Sanwa Bank California, a California corporation
("Sanwa"), Tokai and FIB with respect to that property commonly
known as 223 North Crescent Way, Anaheim, California;

2.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by    
A.J. to First American for the benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB   
with respect to that property commonly known as 20945 Plummer
Street, Chatsworth, California;

3.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL
to First American for the benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with
respect to that property commonly known as 7915 Center Avenue,
Cucamonga, California;

4.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL
to First American for the benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with respect
to that property known as Lot 11, Tract 11428, in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California;

5.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL
to First American for the benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with respect
to that property known as Lot 13, Tract 11428, in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California;

6.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by     
DDL to Fidelity National Title Insurance Company for the benefit
of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property commonly
known as 21423 North 11th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona;

7.   Request for Reconveyance of that certain Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by
Aero-Or to First American for the benefit of Tokai and FIB with
respect to that property commonly known as 1270 NW 167th Place,
Beaverton, Oregon;

8.   Deed of Release among Irlandus, FIB, Tokai and Sanwa with
respect to that property located in Northern Ireland;

9.   Deed of Release among DDL-E, FIB, Tokai and Sanwa with
respect to that property located in Northern Ireland;

10.  Deed of Release among DDL-L, FIB, Tokai and Sanwa with
respect to that property located in Northern Ireland;

11.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating FIB'S and
Tokai's security interest in the assets of DDL under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Oregon Secretary
of State on June 23, 1992 as file number R12780;

12.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating FIB's and
Tokai's security interest in the assets of Aero-Cal under that
certain Financing Statement filed in the Office of the California
Secretary of State on June 22, 1992 as file number 92134431;

13.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating FIB's and
Tokai's security interest in the assets of Aero-Or under that
certain Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Oregon
Secretary of State on June 23, 1992 as file number R1278l;

14.  Form UCC-2 Termination Statement terminating FIB's and
Tokai's security interest in the assets of A.J. under that
certain Financing Statement filed in the Office of the California
Secretary of State on June 22, 1992 as file number 92134433;

15.  Form UCC-2 Termination Statement terminating FIB's and
Tokai's security interest in the assets of DDL under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the California
Secretary of State on June 22, 1992 as file number 92134429;

16.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating FIB'S security
interest in the assets of Aero-Or under that certain Financing
Statement filed in the Official Records of the County Recorder of
Washington County, Oregon on May 13, 1986 as file number
86019995;

17.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Tokai's
security interest in the assets of Aero-Or under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Official Records of the County
Recorder of Washington County, Oregon on May 13, 1986 as file
number 86019996;

18.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Tokai's
security interest in the assets of Aero-Or under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Oregon Secretary
of State on May 12, 1986 as file number K44261;

19.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating FIB's security 
interest in the assets of Aero-Or under that certain Financing
Statement filed in the Office of the Oregon Secretary of State on
May 12, 1986 as file number K44260;

20.  Form UCC-3 Termination Statement terminating Sanwa's
security interest in the assets of DDL under that certain
Financing Statement filed in the Office of the Delaware Secretary
of State on June 23, 1992 as file number 9207522;

21.  Assignment of Deed of Trust (as collateral), assigning all 
beneficial interest under that certain Second Deed of Trust and
Assignment of Rents with Request for Notice dated May 10, 1990
executed by M. Peter Thomas and Lisa Thomas recorded as
Instrument No. 90-286466 and further recorded as Instrument     
No. 90-375203.

22.  Assignment of Deed of Trust (as collateral), assigning all
beneficial interest under that certain Second Deed of Trust and
Assignment of Rents with Request for Notice dated May 30, 1990
executed by Thomas J. Gullo and Linda G. Gullo recorded as
Instrument No. 90-314878 and further recorded as Instrument No.
90-372668.

23.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property
commonly known as 223 North Crescent Way, Anaheim, California;

24.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property
commonly known as 20945 Plummer Street, Chatsworth, California;

25.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with respect to that property
commonly known as 7915 Center Avenue, Cucamonga, California;

26.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with respect to that property known as
Lot 11, Tract 11428, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California;

27.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to First American for the
benefit of Sanwa and Tokai with respect to that property known as
Lot 13, Tract 11428, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California;

28.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by DDL to Fidelity National Title
Insurance Company for the benefit of Sanwa, Tokai and FIB with
respect to that property commonly known as 21423 North 11th
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona;

29.  Original Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing by Aero-Or to Transamerica Title
Insurance Company for the benefit of FIB and Tokai with respect
to that property commonly known as 1270 NW 167th Place,
Beaverton, Oregon;

30.  Original Second Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents with
Request for Notice dated May 10, 1990 executed by M. Peter Thomas
and Lisa Thomas recorded as Instrument No.90-286466 and further
recorded as Instrument No. 90-375203;

31.  Original Second Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents with
Request for Notice dated May 30, 1990 executed by Thomas J. Gullo
and Linda G. Gullo recorded as Instrument No. 90-314878 and
further recorded as Instrument No. 90-372668;

32.  Original Promissory Note Secured by Second Deed of Trust
dated May 10, 1990 in the principal amount of $560,000 executed
by M. Peter Thomas and Lisa Thomas;

33.  Original Promissory Note Secured by Second Deed of Trust
dated May 30, 1990 in the principal amount of $250,000 executed
by Thomas J. Gullo and Linda G. Gullo;

34.  Original Promissory Note dated February 28, 1992 in the
principal amount of $292,536.36 executed by Omni Acquisition
Corp.


                                 EXHIBIT 2
                                    TO
                           TERMINATION AGREEMENT
                         Termination of Agreements



1.   The Indenture;

2.   The Loan Agreement;

3.   The Reimbursement Agreement;

4.   The Letter of Credit;

5.   Pledge and Security Agreement dated May 1, 1986 by Aero-Or, 
Tokai and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.;

6.   Guaranty Agreement dated May 1, 1986, as amended, between
DDL and Tokai;

7.   Guaranty Agreement dated May 1, 1986, as amended, between
DDL and FIB;

8.   Pledge and Security Agreement dated June 5, 1992 by DDL in
favor of Tokai, Sanwa, and FIB;

9.   General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by DDL
in favor of Tokai and FIB;

10.  General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by
Aero-Or in favor of Tokai and FIB;

11.  General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by
AeroCal in favor of Tokai and FIB;

12.  General Security Agreement dated as of June 5, 1992 by A.J.
in favor of Tokai and FIB;

13.  Continuing Guaranty dated as of June 5, 1992 by DDL in favor
of Tokai and FIB;

14.  Continuing Guaranty dated as of June 5, 1992 by Aero-Cal in
favor of Tokai and FIB; and

15.  Continuing Guaranty dated as of June 5, 1992 by A.J. in
favor of Tokai and FIB.


EXHIBIT 10-AP                    AGREEMENT



This Settlement Agreement is entered into by, between, and among
DDL Electronics, Inc. (hereinafter "DDL"), William E. Cook,
Rockell N. Hankin, Philip H. Alspach, and John F. Coyne, all in
their individual capacity as well as officers and/or directors of
DDL Electronics, Inc., and Karen Beth Brenner, Richard Fechtor,
Don A. Raig, Ronald J. Vannuki, Bernee D. L. Strom, Erven
Tallman, Melvin Foster, and Robert G. Wilson, all in their
individual capacities, as shareholders in DDL  Electronics, Inc.
as applicable, as proposed nominees to the DDL Electronics, Inc.,
board of directors, and/or as members of a shareholders'
committee known as "Shareholders Committee to Remove a Moribund
Management" ("SCRMM").

I.   PREAMBLE.  This Settlement Agreement is intended to effect
an orderly transition and transfer of control to a new board of
directors and management of DDL Electronics, Inc.  The parties
hereto agree to the procedures described herein, as well as to
the mutual undertakings herein expressed, agreeing that each
procedure and undertaking is conditioned on fulfillment of all
others.

2.   EQUITABLE JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT.  All parties agree
that the provisions of this Settlement Agreement may not lend
themselves to adequate remedies at law.  Accordingly, all parties
agree that this agreement, or any portion of it, shall be subject
to equitable as well as legal jurisdiction and that the
agreement, or any portion of it, shall be enforced by such
equitable remedies or injunctive relief as a court of competent
jurisdiction may direct.

3.   JURISDICTION AND APPLICABLE LAW.  This Settlement Agreement
shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware, and jurisdiction shall rest only with a Delaware state
or Federal court of competent jurisdiction, to the exclusion of
any and all other jurisdictions and courts.

4.   FRAMEWORK OF SETTLEMENT.   The parties hereto agree to a
settlement of a contest for control of the corporation, and other
matters, in which the following actions will take place:

(a)  The May 31, 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of DDL will
be properly convened and a quorum declared to be present;

(b)  Election of two (2) Class II directors will be the first 
item on the agenda, and the chair of the  meeting shall recognize
and receive nominations from any shareholder seeking recognition
from the floor at the Annual Meeting, and the casting of votes 
and proxies shall be conducted in accordance with the Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws of DDL.

(c)  In the event that the parties' preliminary tally of votes
and proxies appears to confirm the election of Bernee D. L. Strom
and Erven Tallman to the to (2) positions as Class II directors,
the chair of the meeting shall announce that preliminary result
to the Annual Meeting, subject to subsequent certification by CT
Corporation as election inspectors.

(d)  in the event that the preliminary tally of votes and proxies
appears to confirm the election of Bernee D. L. Strom and Erven
Tallman to the two (2) positions as Class II directors, the chair 
will announce that Rockell N. Hankin and John F. Coyne accept the 
apparent results of the election and that they will submit their
resignations as directors, effective immediately, in order to
facilitate an orderly transition and transfer of control.

(e)  The chair of the Annual Meeting shall announce that this 
Settlement Agreement has been reached by and among the parties,
and that the Agreement permits the selection of a new board of
directors and management team.  The chair will also announce that
the Chairman of the Board expects and intends to resign from all
positions with the Company in the event that the new board of
directors so requests.

(f)  If there is no further business to be brought before the
Annual Meeting, the meeting shall be adjourned.

(g)  Within thirty (30) minutes following adjournment of the
Annual Meeting, the remaining directors of DDL, William E. Cook
and Philip H. Alspach, shall formally convene a meeting of the
board and (1) accept the tendered resignations of Rockell N.
Hankin and John F. Coyne, and (2) elect Bernee D. L. Strom and
Erven Tallman as members of the board of directors to fill the
vacancies created by the resignations of Hankin and Coyne.

(h)  Strom and Tallman shall be recognized as duly elected
members of the board and invited to join the meeting then in
progress.

(i)  With the Chairman abstaining, it is expected that the
remaining members of the board shall then request the resignation
of William E. Cook from all positions that he holds with the
Company, and acknowledge that this direct request of the board is
without "Cause" as defined in Mr. Cook's employment agreement of
January 1, 1995.  Mr. Cook shall then tender his resignations.

(j)  The board shall then approve and ratify this Agreement and
acknowledge that DDL is bound by the terms hereof.  The board
then may, in its discretion, vote to expand the number of
directors and elect persons to fill any vacancies created
thereby.

5.   PRIOR AGREEMENTS.  All parties to this Settlement Agreement
agree that the following agreements between the Company and its
employees and directors shall be respected and implemented.  In
particular, without limitation, all parties agree to respect and
implement the terms of the following agreements, which are
incorporated herein as part of this Settlement Agreement:

(a)  Employment Agreements with William E. Cook dated January 1,
1995, and December 3, 1991 (including  exhibits thereto).

(b)  Severance Agreement with John F. Coyne dated December 28,
1994.

(c)  Severance Agreement with M. Charles Van Rossen dated
December 30, 1994.

(d)  Severance Agreement with Everett L. Norman dated April 14,
1995.

6.   INDEMNIFICATION.  In confirmation of their rights to
indemnification under existing agreements with DDL, Messrs. Cook,
Coyne, Hankin, and Alspach shall be indemnified by DDL for all
matters that arose during their service with DDL to the maximum
extent allowed by Delaware law including, without limitation,
mandatory advancement of expenses subject to the requirements of
Section 145(e) of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

7.   PROXY SOLICITATION EXPENSES.  The parties agree that
reasonable proxy solicitation expenses have been incurred in
furtherance of the interests of DDL and its shareholders. Subject 
to reasonable  documentation  and  substantiation,  the persons
expected to be elected  as new directors of  the Company agree
that unpaid proxy solicitation expenses incurred by DDL at the
direction of present management  in an amount not  to exceed One
Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) shall be  paid by
the Company. Reasonable expenses incurred by the Shareholders
Committee to Remove  a Moribund Management (SCRMM),  also subject
to reasonable documentation and substantiation, are also expected
to be paid or reimbursed.   Payments for expenses incurred by
present management shall be made ratably, and at the same time,
as payments made to reimburse expenses incurred by SCRMM.

8.   MUTUAL AND RECIPROCAL RELEASES.  The parties hereto
acknowledge that this Settlement Agreement is intended to resolve
any and all outstanding disagreements or disputes and to resolve
any past claims which exist, or may exist, among them.
Accordingly, the parties hereby release and forever discharge the
Company and one another from any and all past claims, causes of
action, or any other dispute of whatever nature, except any claim
or cause of action that arises from breach of this Agreement.

9.   NON-DISPARAGEMENT.  All parties hereto undertake to refrain
from any disparagement of the Company or any other party with
respect to any matter related to or involving DDL.

10.  PAYMENTS TO WILLIAM E. COOK PURSUANT TO HIS EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT.  In accordance with paragraph 5 hereof, upon his
resignation pursuant to this Agreement, Mr. Cook will be owed a
total sum of One Hundred and Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars
($165,000) pursuant to his employment agreement, which  shall be
paid by DDL in the following manner:

(a)  $35,000, less any normal taxes or other withholdings
required by law, shall be paid within not more than seven (7)
days after the effective date his resignation.

(b)  Thereafter, beginning July 15, 1995, and on the fifteenth
day of each month thereafter, the remaining obligation shall be
discharged by payments made in equal monthly installments of
$10,833.33, less any normal taxes or other withholdings required
by law.

(c)  In the event that DDL receives an anticipated tax refund, in
an amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) or more, all
remaining payments to Mr. Cook shall be accelerated and the
entire remaining obligation shall be paid in a single lump sum
payment within ten (10) days of the tax refund receipt, less any
normal taxes or other withholdings required by law.

11.  COUNTERPART AND FACSIMILE EXECUTION.  This Settlement
Agreement may be executed in counterpart copies or by facsimile
signature.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Settlement
Agreement this 31st day of May, 1995.


DDL Electronics, Inc.



______________________________
By:  William E. Cook               Attest:_____________________
     Chairman and Secretary
     Chief Executive Officer  



________________________________
William E. Cook, Individual and as Director of DDL     


________________________________
Rockell N. Hankin  Individual and as Director of DDL



John F. Coyne 
Individual and as Director of DDL


Bernee D. L. Strom, Individual
and as Prospective Director
of DDL      



Erven Tallman, Individual
and as Prospective Director
of DDL      


Melvin Foster, Individual
and as Prospective Director
of DDL      


Don A. Raig, Individual
and as Prospective Director
of DDL      


Robert G. Wilson, Individual
and as Prospective Director
of DDL      


Richard Fechtor, Individual
and as Shareholder in DDL 


Karen Beth Brenner, Individual
and as Shareholder in DDL 


Ronald J. Vannuki, Individual
and as Shareholder in DDL 

EXHIBIT 10-AO              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

          THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement",) is made
and entered into of the 1st day of January, 1995, by and between
DDL ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and WILLIAM E. COOK ("Cook").


                                BACKGROUND

     A.   The Company has employed Cook as its Chief Executive
Officer.

     B.   Pursuant to a Resolution of the Board of Directors of
the Company dated December 30, 1994, the Company is authorized
and instructed to enter into this Agreement to set forth the
terms and conditions of such continuing employment.

     C.   Cook agrees to be employed by the Company pursuant to
the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

                                 AGREEMENT

                                    I.
                                EMPLOYMENT

     1.1  Position.  The Company hereby engages and employs Cook
in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer.  The Company's Board
of Directors (the "Board") may provide such additional
designations of title to Cook as the Board, in its discretion,
may deem appropriate.  Cook shall report directly to the Board
and shall perform the executive duties and functions of Chief
Executive Officer, subject to the reasonable limitations of
authority set forth from time to time in the resolutions of the
Board and applicable law.  Cook shall not be required without his
consent to undertake responsibilities not commensurate with his
position as Chief Executive Officer, nor shall the Company
unreasonably limit or restrict his authority or responsibility in
the performance of those duties.

     1.2  Duties.  Cook's duties will include all of those
generally associated with the position of Chief Executive
Officer, subject to the direction of the Board.  Such duties will
include the full time corporate management of all of the
Company's operations, with Cook's primary duties being to focus
his efforts toward the objective of making the Company
profitable, of seeking additional financing (as required), and
developing and implementing a growth strategy for the Company
through internal operations and acquisition alternatives.

                                    II.
                         COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

     2.1  Base Salary.  Cook's base salary shall be at the rate
of One-Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars ($165,000) per year. 
This base salary will be reviewed at least annually by the
Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Compensation
Committee"), but shall not be adjusted down without Cook's prior
written consent.

     2.2  Bonus.  Cook shall be eligible to participate in the
Company's bonus plans as the same may be adopted from time to
time.

     2.3  Other Benefits.  Cook shall be entitled to four (4)
weeks per year of vacation time.  The Company shall furnish Cook
with an automobile or a car allowance of $600 per month. In
addition, the Company shall provide Cook with the medical
benefits that are made available at any given time to the other
executives of the Company, and shall provide Cook with an annual
paid medical examination.  The Company shall also furnish Cook
with a life insurance policy in the amount of two (2) times
Cook's base salary with an optional additional amount of one (1)
time base salary paid for by Cook.

     2.4  Expense Reimbursement.  Cook shall be reimbursed for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in accordance with the
Company's established policies applicable to all officers.


                                   III.
                       TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY

     3.1  At Will.  Cook and the Company acknowledge and agree
that Cook's employment with the Company is expressly "at will"
both during and after the term of this Agreement.  This means
that either party may terminate Cook's employment with or without
cause.  Any termination of Cook's employment is, however, subject
to the terms and provisions of this Agreement as to severance pay
and other obligations.

     3.2  Voluntary Resignation.  In the event that Cook's
employment with the Company terminates as a result of his
voluntary resignation, Cook shall be entitled to no severance
pay.  For purposes of this Agreement, the term "voluntary
resignation" shall not include a resignation that is tendered by
Cook pursuant to a direct request of the Board.  A resignation
tendered by Cook pursuant to a direct request of the Board shall,
for purposes of this Agreement, be treated as an involuntary
termination, and Cook's entitlement to severance pay and
additional benefits in accordance with the provisions of Sections
3.3(a) and 3.3(b) below shall depend upon whether the Board's
request was based on Cause (as defined in Section 3.3(c) below).

     3.3  Involuntary Termination.

          (a)  Severance Pay.  In the event that Cook's
employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for
Cause (as defined in Section 3.3(c) below), Cook shall be
entitled to no severance pay.  In the event that Cook's
employment with the Company is terminated other than for Cause,
Cook shall be entitled to severance pay in the form of a lump-sum
cash payment equal to the sum of (i) Cook's highest annual base
salary rate with the Company within the three-year period ending
on the date of Cook's termination, plus (ii) a "Bonus Increment.
"  The Bonus Increment shall equal the annualized average of all
bonus and incentive compensation payments paid to Cook pursuant
to Section 2.2 above during the two-year period immediately
before the date of Cook's termination. Cook shall not be required
or obligated to obtain other employment to mitigate the payments
due him hereunder, and no compensation received by Cook from such
other employment shall be an offset against the payments to be
made by the Company.

          (b)  Additional Benefits.  In the event that Cook's
employment with the Company is terminated by the Company other
than for Cause (as defined in Section 3.3(c) below), Cook shall
be entitled to continue to participate in the Company's employee
benefit programs (including without limitation the car or car
allowance) that had been made available to Cook pursuant to
Section 2.3 above.  These programs shall be continued at no cost
to Cook, except to the extent that tax rules require the
inclusion of the value of such benefits in Cook's income.  The
programs shall continue for the benefit of Cook for a period of
one (1) year after the date of Cook's termination, in the same
way and at the same level as immediately prior to Cook's
termination.  In addition, in the event that Cook's employment is
terminated with the Company other than for Cause, the Company
shall transfer to Cook ownership and possession (free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances) of the personal computer,
computerized day calendar (including all related personal
information manager software), and cellular telephone in Cook's
possession, custody or control immediately prior to Cook's
termination.

          (c)  Cause.  For purposes of this Agreement, "Cause"
shall mean (i) the willful and deliberate refusal of Cook to
comply with a lawful, written instruction of the Board, which
refusal is not remedied by Cook within a reasonable period of
time after his receipt of written notice from the Company
identifying the refusal, so long as the instruction is consistent
with the scope and responsibilities of Cook's designated
capacity; (ii) an act or acts of personal dishonesty by Cook that
were intended to result in substantial personal enrichment of
Cook at the expense of the Company; (iii) Cook's conviction of
any felony involving an act of moral turpitude; or (iv) Cook's
material breach of any representation or covenant contained in
Section 5, 6 or 7 of this Agreement.

          (d)  Constructive Termination.  Cook's employment with
the Company shall be deemed to have been involuntarily terminated
by the Company in the event of a "Constructive Termination" (as
defined below).  Cook shall be entitled to the severance pay and
additional benefits set forth in Sections 3.3(a) and 3.3(b) above
if (i) Cook gives written notice of his resignation within thirty
(30) days of such Constructive Termination and advises, as part
of such resignation, that he is resigning because of the
Constructive Termination, and (ii) the Constructive Termination
was other than for Cause.

          For purposes of this Agreement, "Constructive
Termination" shall mean (i) the material reduction or material
adverse modification of Cook's authority or duties without his
prior written consent (i.e., the substantial diminution or
adverse modification in Cook's title, status, overall position,
responsibilities, rporting relationship or general working
environment); (ii) failure of Cook to be reelected as a Director
of the Company (unless Cook advises that he does not desire to be
nominated); (iii) failure by the Company to provide
indemnification to Cook when permitted by the Company's charter
documents or indemnity agreement with Cook, as the same may be
amended or revised from time to time; or (iv) the purchase by one
person or entity, or two or more persons or entities acting in
concert, of equity securities of the Company representing more
than fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate voting power of all
outstanding securities of the Company.

     3.4  Death.  In the event of Cook's death, this Agreement
shall automatically terminate and shall be of no further force
and effect.  Termination of Cook's employment as a result of his
death shall not result in any obligation by the Company to pay
severance pay or other benefits to Cook's estate or heirs.

     3.5  Disability.  In the event of Cook's Disability (as
defined below) during the term of this Agreement for any period
of at least three (3) consecutive months, the Company shall have
the right, which may be exercised in its sole discretion, to
terminate this Agreement.  In the event the Company does elect to
terminate this Agreement, Cook shall not be entitled to any
severance pay at any time but shall be entitled to normal
disability benefits in accordance with the policies established
from time to time by the Company.  For purposes of this
Agreement, "Disability" shall mean the inability of Cook to
perform his employment services hereunder by reason of physical
or mental illness or incapacity as determined by a physician
chosen by the Company and reasonably satisfactory to Cook or his
legal representative.


                                    IV.
                                   TERM

     This Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof and
shall terminate one year after the date of Cook's employment
termination.

                                   V.
                      NONDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
                    AND NON-SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYEES

     5.1  Nondisclosure of Confidential Information. Except in
the performance of his duties hereunder, Cook shall not disclose
to any person or entity or use for his own direct or indirect
benefit any Confidential Information (as defined below)
pertaining to the Company obtained by Cook in the course of his
employment with the Company.  For purposes of this Agreement,
"Confidential Information" shall include the Company's products,
services, processes, suppliers, customers, customers' account
executives, financial, sales and distribution information, price
lists, identity and list of actual and potential customers, trade
secrets, technical information, business plans and strategies to
the extent that such information has not been publicly
disseminated by the Company, other than through a breach hereof.

     5.2  Non-Solicitation.  Cook agrees that, so long as he is
employed by the Company and for a period of one (1) year after
termination of his employment for any reason except involuntary
termination without Cause, he shall not (a) directly or
indirectly solicit, induce or attempt to solicit or induce any
Company employee to discontinue his or her employment with the
Company, (b) usurp any opportunity of the Company that Cook
became aware of during his tenure at the Company or which is made
available to him on the basis of the belief that Cook is still
employed by the Company, or (c) directly or indirectly solicit or
induce or attempt to influence any person or business that is an
account, customer or client of the Company to restrict or cancel
the business of any such account, customer or client with the
Company.


                                    VI.
                              NON-COMPETITION

          So long as Cook is employed by the Company and for a
period of one (1) year after termination of his employment for
any reason except involuntary termination without Cause, Cook
shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company's
President, either directly or indirectly, including without
limitation through a partnership, joint venture, corporation or
other entity or as a consultant, director or employee, engage in
the business engaged in by the Company as of the date hereof
within those geographical areas in which the Company currently
conducts active business operations.

          The parties hereto agree that both the scope and nature
of the covenant and the duration and area for which the covenant
not to compete set forth in this Article VI is to be effective
are reasonable in light of all facts and circumstances.  In the
event that any provision of this Agreement, including without
limitation any provision of this Article VI, shall to any extent
be held invalid, unreasonable or unenforceable, in any
circumstances, the parties hereto agree that the remainder of
this Agreement and the application of such provision of this
Agreement to other circumstances shall be valid and enforceable
to the fullest extent permitted by law.  If any provision, or any
part thereof, is held to be unenforceable because of the scope or
duration of or the area covered by such provision, the parties
hereto agree that the court making such determination shall have
the power, and is hereby asked by the parties, to reduce the
scope, duration and/or area of such provisions (and to substitute
appropriate provisions for any such unenforceable provisions) in
order to make such provisions enforceable to the fullest extent
permitted by law, and/or to delete specific words and phrases,
and such modified provisions shall then be enforceable and shall
be enforced.


                                   VII.
                   REPRESENTATIONS AND COVENANTS OF COOK

     7.1  Best Efforts.  In consideration of the payments to be
made hereunder, Cook agrees to devote substantially his entire
business time and attention to the performance of his duties
hereunder, and to serve the Company diligently and to the best of
his abilities.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Cook shall have
the continuing right to (a) make passive investments in the
securities of any publicly-owned corporation, (b) make any other
passive investments with respect to which he is not obligated or
required to, and does not in fact, devote any substantial
managerial efforts that interfere with his fulfillment of his
duties, and (c) upon the prior approval of the disinterested
Directors of the Company's Board, serve as a director or
consultant for other companies or entities.

     7.2  No Restrictions.  Cook represents that he is under no
actual or alleged restriction, limitation or other prohibition
(whether as a result of his prior employment or otherwise) to
perform his duties as described herein.

                                   VIII.
                               MISCELLANEOUS

     8.1  No Waiver.  The waiver by either party of a breach of
any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as or be
construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach thereof.

     8.2  Notices.  Any and all notices referred to herein shall
be sufficiently furnished if in writing, and sent by registered
or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the respective parties at
the following addresses or such other address as either party may
from time to time designate in writing:

To the Company:     DDL Electronics, Inc.
                    7320 SW Hunziker Road Suite 300 
                    Tigard, Oregon  97223-2302
                    Attention:  Secretary

     To Cook:       Mr. William E. Cook
                    14775 SW Peachtree Drive
                    Tigard, Oregon  97224-1486

     8.3  Assignment.  This Agreement may not be assigned by
Cook.  This Agreement shall be binding upon the Company's
successors and assigns.

     8.4  Entire Agreement.  This Agreement supersedes any and
all prior written or oral agreements between Cook and the
Company, and contains the entire understanding of the parties
hereto with respect to the terms and conditions of Cook's
employment with the Company.  Nothing herein shall modify or
amend that certain General Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement,
effective as of December 3, 1991, between the Company and Cook.

     8.5  Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws and decisions of the State
of Delaware.

     8.6  Expenses.  The Company agrees to pay all fees and
expenses incurred by it in connection with the preparation of
this Agreement.  In addition, the Company shall pay all of Cook's
fees, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees)
incurred in connection with entering into this Agreement and
enforcing his rights hereunder.

     8.7  Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in one or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to constitute an
original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.

The "Company":

DDL ELECTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation



By:________________________________________
Its.  Chief Financial Officer And Secretary



"Cook":





___________________________________________
William E. Cook     


  EXHIBIT 11

                    DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



                                          Year Ended June 30    

                                1995          1994             1993

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
  Loss from continuing 
  operations                  $(2,366,000)    $(8,354,000)    $(5,630,000)

  Income (loss) from 
  discontinued operations          -             -                603,000 

  Extraordinary items           2,441,000          -            6,100,000 


  Net income (loss)               $75,000     $(8,354,000)     $1,073,000 

Weighted average number 
of common shares 
outstanding                    15,149,968      14,239,292       9,332,774

Assumed exercise of stock 
options net of shares 
assumed reacquired under 
treasury stock method 
using average market price       820,549          857,883         795,906


Average common shares 
and common share 
equivalents                   15,970,517       15,097,175      10,128,680

Primary earnings (loss) per share:

    Continuing operations            $(0.15)          $(0.55)          $(0.56)
    Discontinued operations             -                -               0.06 
    Extraordinary items                0.15              -               0.60 
                                     $(0.00)          $(0.55)          $ 0.10 




NOTE:  Calculation of primary earnings per share for fiscal 1994
includes 857,883 of exercisable stock options. Including these exercisable
stock options makes primary earnings per share antidilutive.






                                                                  
     EXHIBIT 11

                    DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (Continued)


                                          Year Ended June 30      
        
 
 
                                1995          1994             1993

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS 
PER SHARE:
Loss from continuing 
operations                   $(2,366,000)     $(8,354,000)  $(5,630,000)
Add back net interest 
related to convertible 
subordinated debentures          134,000          135,000       274,000

Loss from continuing 
operations for fully 
diluted computation           (2,232,000)      (8,219,000)    (5,356,000)     
Income (loss) from 
discontinued operations            -                -            603,000

Extraordinary items             2,441,000           -           6,100,000     
Net income (loss) 
for fully diluted 
computation                   $   209,000      $(8,219,000)   $(1,347,000)    

Weighted average number 
of common shares 
outstanding                    15,149,968       14,239,292      9,332,774    
 

Assumed exercise of stock 
options and warrants net 
of shares assumed reacquired 
under treasury stock method 
using period end market price, 
if higher than average 
market price                    1,008,566          852,650      1,975,203 

Assumed conversion of 
convertible subordinated 
debentures               
                                  748,632          764,964      3,100,996 

Average fully diluted shares   16,907,166       15,856,906     14,408,973

Fully diluted earnings 
(loss) per share:
 Continuing operations                $(0.13)          $(0.52)         $(0.37) 
   
Discontinued operations                  -                -              0.04
Extraordinary items                     0.14              -              0.42
                                      $ 0.01            $(0.52)        $ 0.09 


Note:  The calculated fully diluted earnings per share are
antidilutive for fiscal years 1995 and 1994.
<PAGE>

Outside Cover of Annual Report 

DDL Logo 

DDL Electronics, Inc.
1995 Annual Report

Cover contains a shadowed reproduction of a printed circuit board

<PAGE>

                     DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
                               FINANCIAL SUMMARY
                    (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



June 30            1995      1994      1993      1992      1991 

Sales            $29,576  $ 48,529  $ 57,883  $ 58,516   $77,675

Operating Loss    (4,970)   (6,948)   (5,067)  (22,703)  (15,052)

Extraordinary 
     Items         2,441      -        6,100      -        4,807

Net Income (Loss)     75    (8,354)    1,073   (22,305)  (15,315)

Earnings (Loss)
     Per Share    $  .00   $ ( .55)  $   .10   $ (3.34)   $(2.31)






              CONTENTS

         FINANCIAL SUMMARY

         LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS. . . . . . . .    PAGE    1

         FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY . . . . .    PAGE    2

         MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.    PAGE    3-12

         AUDITORS' REPORT. . . . . . . . . . .    PAGE    13

         FINANCIAL SECTION . . . . . . . . . .    PAGE    14-34

         INVESTOR INFORMATION. . . . . . . . .    PAGE    35



DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

DDL Electronics, Inc. is engaged in foreign electronic contract 
manufacturing and fabrication of printed circuit boards
principally for the computer, communications, and instrumentation
industries.  The Company is one of the few suppliers of both of
these services.

<PAGE>
President's Message
To Our Stockholders:

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

         We would like to share with you, our fellow
shareholders, where our Company has been over the past year,
where our Company stands today and where our Company is going
tomorrow.  

         During the past fiscal year, here domestically, prior
management was forced to recognize that the "turnarounds" which
were extensively discussed and promised in our Company's two
prior year's Annual Reports were not going to become a reality. 
As a result, the Company's unprofitable production facility in
Southern California was closed and the facility sublet, and the
Company's unprofitable production facility in Beaverton, Oregon
was sold.  The Company used proceeds from these transactions to
eliminate all of its outstanding senior debt.

         These two significant moves by the prior management of
the Company were obviously considered too little and too late for
more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the shareholders of this
Company when they joined together on May 31, 1995 at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders at Rosemont, Illinois to force the
resignation of prior management and Board of Directors.

         Since the beginning of June, your fellow shareholders,
as interim executives, have been working long and hard to deal
with the multiplicity of problems arising out of DDL's past. 
Gradual progress can be seen on a monthly basis as non-productive
assets are disposed of and residual liabilities are reduced.  You
should anticipate that this process will continue throughout the
balance of this calendar year.

         Our Company's state of the art facilities at DDL
Electronics, Ltd. and Irlandus Circuits, Ltd., even though
operating well below capacity, were profitable for both the third
and fourth quarter of fiscal year 1995 and this same favorable
profit picture is continuing through the first quarter of fiscal
year 1996.

         As your fellow shareholders work daily to improve the
strength of our Company's balance sheet and operating
performance, we are also pursuing an aggressive strategy of
business combinations and business alliances so that our Company
re-establishes a profitable presence domestically while at the
same time expanding our production levels and profitability in
Northern Ireland.

         We understand and appreciate the charge from our fellow
shareholders; we labor daily and diligently to fulfill that
charge.  We firmly believe that with a little bit of patience and
luck, your and our investment in DDL Electronics, Inc. will once
again rise from the ashes.


/S/ Don A. Raig
- ---------------

DON A. RAIG, PRESIDENT
and CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER


<PAGE>


                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
    (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts and shares
outstanding)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                             Year ended June 30
<S>                      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       
                         ________________________________________
                         1995      1994      1993      1992    1991 
OPERATING DATA     
Sales                 $ 29,576  $ 48,529  $ 57,883  $ 58,516  $77,675

Costs and expenses:
 Cost of goods sold     26,516    47,860    55,052    57,688   77,479
 Administrative and 
    selling expenses     6,497     7,617     7,898     9,692   15,248
 Restructuring charges   1,533        -         -     13,839      -  
                        ------    ------    ------    ------   ------
Total costs & Expenses  34,546    55,477    62,950    81,219   92,727
                        ------    ------    ------    ------   ------
Operating loss          (4,970)   (6,948)   (5,067)  (22,703) (15,052)

Non-operating income (expense):
 Investment income         109       168       280       639    1,899
 Interest expense                   (883)   (1,110)   (1,107)   (1,830)  (4,058)
 Gain on Termination 
    of Pension Plan                   -         -         -         -     3,577
 Earthquake Costs                     -       (500)       -         -       - 
 Gain on sale of assets            3,317         2       264     1,589      - 
 Other income                         61        34        -         -       - 
                                  ------    ------    ------    ------   ------
Total non-operating
     income (expense)              2,604    (1,406)     (563)      398    1,418
                                   ------    ------    ------    ------   ------
Loss from continuing operations
 before income taxes              (2,366)   (8,354)   (5,630)  (22,305) (13,634)
(Provision) benefit for
    income taxes                      -         -         -         -       990
                                   ------    ------    ------    ------   ------
Loss from continuing 
     operations                   (2,366)   (8,354)   (5,630)  (22,305) (12,644)
Income (loss) from discontinued 
operations, less applicable 
income taxes                          -         -        603        -    (7,478)
                                    ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
Loss before extra-
     ordinary items               (2,366)   (8,354)   (5,027)  (22,305) (20,122)
Extraordinary items:
  Gain on debt 
     extinguishment                2,441        -      6,100        -     4,807
                                  ------    ------    ------    ------   ------
  Net income (loss)             $     75  $ (8,354) $  1,073  $(22,305)$(15,315)
                                 =======   =======   =======   =======  =======

Earnings (loss) per share:
 Primary:
Continuing operations               $(0.15)   $(0.55)   $(0.56)   $(3.34)  $(1.91)
Discontinued operations                 -         -       0.06        -     (1.12)
Extraordinary items                   0.15        -       0.60        -      0.72
                                     -----     -----     -----     -----    -----
       Total                      $   -      $(0.55)   $ 0.10    $(3.34)  $(2.31) 
                                    =====     =====     =====     =====    =====
Fully diluted:
Continuing operations               $(0.15)   $(0.55)   $(0.37)   $(3.34)  $(1.91)
Discontinued operations                 -         -       0.04        -     (1.12)
Extraordinary items                   0.15        -       0.42        -      0.72
                                     -----     -----     -----     -----    -----
       Total                       $   -     $(0.55)   $ 0.09    $(3.34)  $(2.31)
                                     =====     =====     =====     =====    =====

BALANCE SHEET DATA        1995         1994         1993         1992     1991 
                          ----         ----         ----         ----     ----
Current assets         $ 8,876      $12,018       $20,085       $23,116  $33,717
Current liabilities      8,904      $21,277       $14,289       $16,950  $30,678
Working capital (Deficit  $(28)     $(9,259)      $ 5,666       $ 6,166  $ 3,039
Current ratio *              1.0          0.6           1.4           1.4      1.1
Total assets           $12,590      $23,258       $33,739       $46,626  $72,639
Long-term debt         $ 7,030      $ 6,870       $20,393       $35,959  $28,060
Stockholders' equity
  (deficit)            $(3,344)     $(4,889)      $  (943)      $(6,283) $13,901
Equity (deficit)
   per share                $(0.21)      $(0.34)       $(0.08)        $(0.92)     $2.10
Shares outstanding   16,062,979   14,468,718    11,972,880      6,863,243  6,635,243

*Current ratio below 1.0 due to classification of the Company's
senior
debt as current.
<PAGE>

   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                      AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
    (NUMBERS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AND SHARE AMOUNTS)


Introductory Statement

    DDL Electronics, Inc. (the "Company" or "DDL") is an
independent provider ofelectronic contract manufacturing ("ECM")
services and a fabricator of printed circuit boards("PCBs") for
use primarily in the computer, communications, and
instrumentation industries.  Through its operating subsidiaries,
the Company provides ECM services for manufacturers of electronic
equipment.  The Company's ECM and PCB operations are located in
Northern Ireland and primarily provide services for customers in
Europe.

    Historically, DDL was a diversified holding company with
operations in the areas of ECMand PCB fabrication, broadband
communications equipment, and other businesses.  In the past
several years, the Company focused its activities in the area of
advanced ECM and PCB fabrication.  During fiscal 1995 the Company
sold substantially all the assets of its United States ECM and
PCB operations.  The sales enabled the Company to payoff senior
debt thereby reducing the Company's future financing costs.

    The Company has incurred operating losses in recent years. 
These losses totaled $4,970, $6,948 and $5,067 in the fiscal
years ended June 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively. 
Although the Company had net income for the years ended June 30,
1995 and 1993, the profits of $75 and $1,073, respectively,
included a gain in fiscal 1995 of $3,317 on sales of assets and
extraordinary gains of $2,441 and $6,100 in fiscal 1995 and 1993,
respectively, recognized as a result of debt extinguishment.  For
fiscal years ended June 30, 1995, 1994 and 1993, the Company's 
ECM and PCB fabrication businesses incurred operating losses of
$2,128, $5,745 and $3,799, respectively, prior to the allocation
of general corporate expenses.  General corporate expenses during
these three periods amounted to $2,842, $1,703, and $2,053,
respectively.  As of June 30, 1995, total stockholders' deficit
was $3,344.

    Industry-wide factors have resulted in excess production
capacity, severe price competition, and collection difficulties
in the markets in which the Company does business.  As explained
later, Company-specific factors have contributed to poor yields
and less than acceptable on-time delivery performance.  As a
result of these conditions the Company consolidated its
continuing operations into its ECM and PCB facilities in Northern
Ireland.  The combined European group had an operating profit in
fiscal 1995 of $617, while incurring operating losses in both
fiscal 1994 and 1993 of $1,206 and $1,129, respectively.

    The January 17, 1994 Los Angeles earthquake caused major
structural damage to two leased buildings in Chatsworth,
California housing the Company's subsidiary, A.J. Electronics,
Inc.  In August 1994, after three months of arduous review, the
Small Business Administration Disaster Assistance Division
("SBA") denied A.J. Electronics, Inc.'s ("A.J.") request for
economic financial assistance prompted as a result of physical
damage suffered in the Los Angeles earthquake.  Management
estimates that costs incurred as a result of the earthquake
exceeded $500, not including the impact from lost business and
costs to rebuild new business.  A.J. was unable to recover from
the disastrous effects of the earthquake and incurred substantial
operating losses and cash outlays since January 1994.  A.J.'s
financial plan predicted that it would not fully recover
economically until sometime in fiscal 1996.  Management reviewed
the situation at A.J. immediately after the decision by the SBA
and concluded that A.J. would be a substantial economic burden on
the consolidated group without financial assistance considering
the limited working capital available to the Company.  As a
result, management committed to a formal plan to liquidate and
sell the Company's A.J. segment.  The plan for disposal was
reviewed and approved by DDL's Board of Directors in its
September 1, 1994 Board meeting.  On January 17, 1995, the
Company sold virtually all of A.J.'s operating assets to Raven
Industries, Inc. ("Raven") for a purchase price of approximately
$663 and Raven's assumption of approximately $300 in capitalized
lease obligations.  Raven also assumed the sales tax obligation
associated with the sale that approximated $79.  A.J. entered
into a non-competition agreement with Raven that prevents A.J.,
but not the Company nor any of its other subsidiaries, from
engaging in contract manufacturing in competition with Raven.

    A.J. was a separate corporation and was DDL's only U.S. ECM
operation.  Although DDL has an ECM operation in Europe, the two
ECM companies did not co-mingle significant amounts of business
due to substantial geographic boundaries, industries served
and/or services provided.  A.J.'s expected liquidation costs were
recorded as a restructuring charge as of December 31, 1994 in the
amount of approximately $1,173.  This amount was subsequently
increased as of fiscal year end 1995 by $360 to $1,533 due to
additional costs associated with the closure of A.J. and for
expected lease termination expenses.

<PAGE>
Results of Operations

    The following table sets forth the Company's sales and other
operating data as percentages of sales:
                                          Year Ended June 30     

                                       1995      1994      1993
                                                
Sales                                 100.0%    100.0%    100.0%
Cost of goods sold                     89.7      98.6      95.1
                                      -----     -----     -----
Gross Margin                           10.3       1.4       4.9

Administrative and selling expenses    21.9      15.7      13.6
Restructuring charges                   5.2        -         -  
                                      -----     -----     -----
Operating loss                        (16.8)    (14.3)     (8.7)
Investment income                        .4        .3        .5
Interest expense                       (3.0)     (2.3)     (1.9)
Earthquake costs                         -       (1.0)       - 
Other income                             .2        .1        - 
Gain on sale of capital assets         11.2        -         .4
                                      -----     -----     -----
Loss from continuing operations 
before income taxes                    (8.0)    (17.2)     (9.7)
(provision) benefit for income taxes     -         -         - 
                                      -----     -----     -----
Loss from continuing operations        (8.0)    (17.2)     (9.7)
Gain (loss) from discontinued 
operations, less income taxes            -         -        1.0
                                      -----     -----     -----
Loss before extraordinary items        (8.0)    (17.2)     (8.7)
Gain on debt extinguishment             8.3        -       10.5
                                      -----     -----     -----
Net income (loss)                        .3%    (17.2)%     1.8%
                                      =====     =====     =====

Results of Operations
Fiscal 1995 vs. 1994

    Consolidated sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995
were $29,576, a decrease of $18,953 from last year.  The
reduction in sales resulted from the closure of the Company's
A.J. Electronics, Inc. ("A.J."), Electronic Contract
Manufacturing ("ECM") operation in November 1994 and the sale of
the Company's Beaverton, Oregon Aeroscientific Corp.("Oregon"),
Printed Circuit Board ("PCB") facility, at the end of December
1994.  Approximately $13,550 and $5,256 of decline in
consolidated sales was due to the reduced business volume at A.J.
and Oregon, respectively.  Restating fiscal years' 1995 and 1994
sales to eliminate both A.J. and Oregon reflects a decrease in
sales for the Company's continuing operations of $147. 
Consolidated gross margin improved by $2,391 to $3,060, or as a
percentage of sales, an improvement to 10.3% in 1995 vs. 1.4% in
1994. 

    A.J.'s continuing operations were severely damaged by the
January 17, 1994 Los Angeles earthquake.  After the earthquake
A.J. met its existing customer commitments, but lost new business
from existing customers and potential customers while the plant
was being recon-structed.  Because of A.J.'s substantial decline
in business, cash outflow and no opportunity for relief
financing, Management committed to the shutdown and liquidation
and sale of A.J. in August 1994.  A.J. ceased all business
activities in November.  The ECM industry, in general, has
experienced increased customer demand as customers move away from
captive or in house ECM capabilities and out source production. 
At the same time, the number of ECM service providers is growing,
thus increasing competition, keeping margins low and forcing
sudden changes in the ECM groups customer base.

    The Company's PCB business, in both the United States and
Europe, continued to be adversely affected by underutilization of
existing capacity which, together with intense competition from
companies within the PCB industry have contributed to a reduction
in sales.  The Company's domestic PCB production, formerly
performed at its Beaverton, Oregon Aeroscientific ("Oregon")
facility, was particularly impacted by its underutilization.  In
late 1994, Oregon changed its product mix and service strategy
concentrating on higher margin, quick turn or proto-type
business.  Oregon's operating results improved but could not
improve quickly enough to take advantage of improvements in the
PCB industry's market.  As a result, management took the
opportunity to sell its Oregon facility to a Japanese PCB company
interested in acquiring a production facility in the  United
States. Consideration for the sale of Oregon's assets included
approximately $9,200 in cash and assumption by the buyer of
approximately $300 of capitalized lease obligations. Oregon
retained its trade accounts receivable and trade accounts
payable.  The sale resulted in a gain of $3,317 net of the book
value of assets sold and of certain selling costs.  Proceeds from
sale of Oregon's assets were used to payoff all of the Company's
senior debt obligation.  This included negotiating a reduction in
the amount owed to one of the senior lenders, Sanwa Bank, of
$2,441; that amount was recognized as an extraordinary gain in
fiscal 1995 in accordance with  the Financial Accounting
Standards Board's, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
#15, "Accounting by Debtors and Creditors in Troubled Debt
Restructuring."  

    Sales for the combined European operations were $20,811 in
fiscal 1995, $147 or .7% lower than in the prior year.  Irlandus
Circuits Limited (Irlandus), located in Craigavon, Northern
Ireland, is a producer of high quality, high technology
multi-layer rigid PCBs.  Sales in U.S. dollars for the current
fiscal year improved by $1,082 or 11.5% over last  year (5.6%
increase as stated in Northern Ireland's functional currency, the
British pound sterling).  In fiscal 1995,  Irlandus concentrated 
on enhancing its quick-turn business (orders delivered in less
than 15 days from date of receipt) and on increased technology
capabilities.  Irlandus also changed its customer mix increasing
the number of new customers who rely more on quick response, low
volume, high technology, high margin business.  As a result
Irlandus has managed to improve pricing and gross margins without
substantially increasing sales volume.  Sales at the Company's
Northern Ireland ECM operation, DDL Electronics Limited
("DDL-E"), were $1,228 or 10.6% lower than last fiscal year
(13.9% lower stated in pounds sterling).  The sales decline at
DDL-E reflects its change in business mix from higher "Turnkey"
(where DDL-E provides all materials, labor and equipment
associated with producing the customers' product) to more
"Consigned" (DDL-E provides labor and equipment only for
manufacturing product) business.  This change in business mix
represented 95%/5% turnkey to consigned in fiscal 1994 versus
83%/17% in fiscal 1995.  Materials used in turnkey sales
typically approximate 70% of the products selling price. 
Consequently, the increase in consigned business in fiscal 1995,
indicates an increase in sales contribution for fiscal 1995 of
approximately 10%.  Weaknesses experienced in fiscal 1994's third
and fourth quarters from two major customers, continued into the
first half of fiscal 1995.  DDL-E experienced a strong recovery
in orders from these two customers in the last two quarters of
fiscal 1995, and coupled with the  addition of several new
customers in the second half of fiscal 1995, this resulted in 70%
of total current year sales being realized during the second half
of the year.

    The Company's consolidated operating loss was lower by $1,978
than last year's loss.  The fiscal 1995 operating loss includes
$1,533 in restructuring charges associated with the shut down and
liquidation of A.J., and approximately $1,400 of non-recurring
general and administrative expenses associated with the Company's
change in board and management through proxy contest, increases
in expected remediation costs associated with the Company's
former Anaheim facility (see Note 11 - Commitments and
Contingencies - notes to the consolidated financial statement)
and an increase in the reserve for costs of the Company's
post-retirement non-competition and consulting program.  

    The Company's Northern Ireland PCB and ECM businesses
performed profitably for the fiscal year ended 1995.  Combined
European gross margin improved by $1,530 to $2,835 while the
fiscal 1994 operating loss was replaced by an operating profit of
$561 (excluding intercompany corporate management fees).  As
previously mentioned, Irlandus realized an operating profit due
to the change in its operating strategy.  DDL-E realized strong
improvement in the second half of fiscal 1995 due to added
customers and increased orders from existing customers.  

    The current year's net loss before extraordinary item was 
$5,988 lower than in fiscal 1994 due to the $3,317 gain resulting
from the sale of Oregon's assets, and reduced interest expense
resulting from the complete payoff of the Company's senior debt
in December 1994. 

    Investment income declined in fiscal 1995 by $59 due to a
lower average monthly balance of investible funds, despite a
higher ending cash balance.  Interest expense declined during
fiscal 1995 as compared to fiscal 1994 as a result of the payoff
of the Company's senior debt.

    Improvement in the Company's consolidated loss from
continuing operations for fiscal 1995 was  due to the Company's
sale or liquidation of  unprofitable operations, improved
operating margins at the Company's continuing subsidiaries, lower
debt costs resulting from payoff of the Company's senior debt and
gain realized from the sale of Oregon's facility and
manufacturing assets.  This was offset by restructuring charges
associated with the liquidation of A.J. and additional general
and administrative costs recorded in the last quarter of fiscal
1995. 


Fiscal 1994 vs. 1993

    Consolidated sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994
were $48,529, a decrease of $9,354 from last year due to lower
sales volume at both the Company's PCB and its ECM operations.  
Sales were particularly affected at the Company's A.J. operation,
as a result of the January 17, 1994 Los Angeles earthquake and
the cancellation of orders by A.J.'s largest customer,
Dataproducts.  Damage to A.J.'s facilities forced a shutdown of
operations for part of January and February, and A.J. did not
return to full capacity until May. 

    The Company's ECM group experienced a decrease in sales for
the fiscal year, from last fiscal year, of $3,223 or 10%.  ECM
sales for fiscal 1994 were $28,620 or 59% of consolidated sales
as compared to fiscal 1993 sales of $31,843, 55% of consolidated
sales.  ECM group sales decline for the fiscal year reflects the
Los Angeles earthquake's impact on A.J.'s operations as well as
the impact from A.J.'s reduced sales to Dataproducts.  PCB
operations experienced a decline in sales of $7,371 or 26% for
the year ended June 30, 1994 when compared to the prior year.

    Oregon's fiscal 1994 sales declined by $2,589 to $11,179, an
18.8% decline from last year.  Competitive market conditions
caused downward pressure on pricing and sales volume. Oregon's
gross margin deficit and operating loss for fiscal 1994 were $628
and $2,379, respectively, or $1,008 and $1,018, respectively,
worse than in fiscal 1993.  The decline in sales and increase in
operating losses were due primarily to lower bookings levels,
extreme price competition and low yields on certain products.  A
change in Oregon's production management team generated improved
yields and higher pricing margins in the third and fourth
quarters, but these improvements were offset by lower sales
volume.  

    Sales for fiscal 1994 at A.J., were $17,057, a decrease of
$4,280 compared to 1993.  The decline in sales is a direct result
of the Los Angeles earthquake, and substantially reduced sales
volume to A.J.'s largest customer, Dataproducts.  A.J.'s sales
for the first two months of calendar 1994 were sharply curtailed
while A.J. awaited reconstruction of its plant facility and
realignment and replacement of damaged machinery and materials. 
Sales to the Company's largest customer, Dataproducts, in 1993
were $7,703.  Most of these sales occurred in the second half of
fiscal 1993, and represented 13.3% of the Company's consolidated
sales.  At the end of fiscal 1993 Dataproducts canceled a large
portion of its orders to A.J., which would have been shipped in
fiscal 1994, due to similar cancellations by Dataproducts'
customers.  Sales to Dataproducts in the first half of fiscal
1994 were $5,645 or 47.5% of A.J.'s total then year to date
sales.  Sales in the second half of fiscal 1994 to Dataproducts
were $677 for combined 1994 sales of $6,322 or 37% of A.J.'s 1994
sales and 13% of consolidated sales.  Sales to Dataproducts are
down sharply from the prior fiscal year and are less than
one-half of what A.J. anticipated before Dataproducts'
cancellations.  A.J.'s gross margin for 1994 was similarly
declined over last year by $408 to a deficit of $509.  A.J.'s
operating loss for the first half of 1994 was an improvement over
prior year's first half loss and worsened in the third and fourth
quarters. Management estimates that losses recognized by A.J. in
the second half of fiscal 1994 were result of capacity lost due
to impact on operations from the earthquake.  As a result, A.J.
shows a worsening of its gross margin deficit for the year
despite a reduction of its work force and reduction of operating
costs.  

    Sales in U.S. dollars at Irlandus, were $9,395 for 1994, a
decline of $4,782 or 33.7%, from the same period last year. 
Fiscal 1994 sales at DDL-E, were $11,563, an increase of $1,057,
or 10% over last year.  Combined European sales for the year, as
stated in dollars, were 15.1% lower than in 1993.  Restating
Irlandus' and DDL-E's combined sales in pounds sterling shows a
decrease in 1994 of only 8.3% when compared to last year. 
Differences in dollar versus pounds sterling caused a sales
decrease, due to the significant drop in the translation rate
during 1993.  The translation rate was lower and held relatively
steady during 1994.  Increased sales at DDL-E are due to sales to
new customers and increased sales to existing customers. DDL-E's
two largest customers, substantially reduced their orders
reducing sales in the second half of fiscal 1994. Irlandus' and
DDL-E's combined gross margin (after government grant subsidies)
for 1994 were $1,305.  This is $707 lower than 1993.  DDL-E's
gross margin was higher over this period by 88% or $483 while
Irlandus' gross margin was lower by 81% or $1,190.  Irlandus'
decline was due to price pressures and competition in the
Company's European PCB market.  Restating the pound sterling
translation rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 shows a
decline in rate to $1.50 pound sterling from fiscal 1993's rate
of $1.60 pound sterling.

    Reduced sales for the ECM business is coupled with a lower
gross margin of approximately 2%.  The PCB business, in both the
United States and Europe, continued to be adversely affected by
underutilization of its existing capacity which, together with
intense competition have contributed to a reduction in sales and
a 2% gross margin deficit for fiscal 1994.  The PCB operations
improved in the fiscal fourth quarter, posting a gross profit
margin of 4.6% on lower sales volume.  The improvement reflects
the Company's change in operating strategy for the PCB group,
concentrating on higher margin, quick turn and prototype
business.

    In the current year, consolidated gross margin declined by
$2,162 to $169 from fiscal 1993 and as a percent of sales to 1.4%
in 1994 vs. 4.9% in 1993.  The ECM groups gross margin for the
year was slightly higher by $75, an 8% increase from last year,
while the PCB groups gross margin declined by $2,198.  ECM
operations contributed $1,025 of gross margin for the current
year.  Although an improvement from last year, the ECM group's
continued low gross margin was a direct result of costs and lost
production capabilities as a result of the Los Angeles
earthquake's impact on A.J.'s facilities and due to order
cancellations by various customers.  PCB operations incurred a
gross margin deficit for the fiscal year of $356.  Much of the
PCB group's loss was incurred in the first half of fiscal 1994,
and was the result of trying to fill the PCB facilities with low
margin, complex and large volume orders.  The PCB group refocused
its business doing more high margin quick turn and prototype
business.

    The consolidated operating loss for fiscal year ended June
30, 1994 was greater than in fiscal 1993 by $1,881.  Lower sales
during fiscal 1994 along with lower gross margin percent
contributed to the decline,  partially offset by reduced
administrative and selling expenses of $281.  Reduced operating
expenses for 1994 were primarily due to the effects of a decline
in the Company's foreign currency translation rate and reduced
operating costs at the Company's PCB and corporate headquarters
operations.  Sharply lower average currency translation rate
during the first half of fiscal 1994 was a significant factor in
reducing Europe's operating costs.

    Investment income declined in 1994, after certain
reclassifications, by $113, mostly due to a reduction in the
Company's unallocated pension funds from a formerly terminated
defined benefit plan.  An average monthly balance of such funds
was approximately $1,366 during fiscal 1993.  This balance
dropped to an average monthly balance in fiscal 1994 of
approximately $463.  Additionally, interest realized on funds
invested in Northern Ireland for the current period showed a
lower U.S. return due to the pound sterling's drop in value. 
There was little change in interest expense during fiscal 1994 as
compared to fiscal 1993.  Although the average lending rate
increased by one percentage point over 1993 and interest expense
grants totaling $142 recognized by the Company's Northern Ireland
entities in fiscal 1993 were not available in fiscal 1994, these
factors were offset by a substantial reduction in debt through
exchange of convertible subordinated debentures for equity and
payments against senior debt. 


Inflation

    Changes in product mix from year to year and highly
competitive markets make it difficult to accurately assess the
impact of inflation on profit margins.  Management generally
believes that business has not been affected adversely or
materially by inflationary increases in costs and expenses.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

    For the year ended June 30, 1995, cash and cash equivalents
increased by $377.  As illustrated in the Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows, this increase in cash included the following:

    1.   $264 was used for operating activities, principally to
fund continued operating losses, before extraordinary gain and
gain on sale of assets.  Losses from operations were partially
offset by a reduction in working capital.

    2.   Investing activities provided $9,389 from the sale of
capital assets, including virtually all of the assets of the
Company's Aeroscientific Corp. and A.J. Electronics, Inc.
subsidiaries.  Offset by capital expenditures of $547 primarily
for the Company's European operations.  

    3.   Financing activities used $8,738 of cash, due to
reductions of long-term debt resulting from normal principal
payments on leases, mortgages and other term debt of $1,160 and
$9,659 of the $12,100 owing to the Company's senior lenders was
paid off in December 1994.  The remaining senior debt of $2,441
owing to Sanwa Bank, was forgiven, and a corresponding
extraordinary gain was recognized for the debt forgiveness.  Cash
used for debt reduction was offset by $612 in additions to
long-term debt, $1,267 from issuance of capital stock and $202 in
proceeds from government grants.

    For the year ended June 30, 1994, cash and cash equivalents
decreased by $228, primarily due to the following:  

    1.   $2,710 was used for operating activities, principally to
fund continued operating losses.

    2.   Investing activities used $670, primarily to finance
capital expenditures purchased for the Company's European
operations.  

    3.   Financing activities provided $3,131 of cash. 
Reductions of long-term debt resulted from normal principal
payments on leases, mortgages and other term debt of $1,187
payments on accrued interest associated with the Company's 7%
Convertible Subordinated Debentures of $63, and $383 in principal
payments on the term loan to Sanwa Bank California ("Sanwa") and
the Industrial Development Bonds pursuant to a sharing
arrangement for net sales proceeds from sales of certain
non-operating assets, and for the sale of Catel.  Such payments
are required in accordance with restructured loan agreements
entered into in June 1992.  Additional financing proceeds include
$268 received from foreign government grants (actual proceeds
based on capital and non-capital grant additions as reflected by
the change in the Company's grant receivable balance), $3,455
from exercise of 2,370 outstanding warrants issued in conjunction
with the fiscal 1993 exchange of convertible subordinated
debentures for equity, $272 from issuance of additional long term
debt, and $675 from issuance of Series B preferred stock to the
Industrial Development Board for Northern Ireland.


    For the year ended June 30, 1993, cash and cash equivalents
decreased by $404,000, primarily due to the following:  

    1.   $1,235 was used for operating activities, principally to
fund continued operating losses.  The decline in cash was
partially offset by the reduction of a terminated pension plan's
deferred asset.

    2.   Investing activities provided $3,250.  Cash was
generated from the sale of capital assets, including the A.J.
Electronics facility in Chatsworth, California, land and
buildings in Phoenix, Arizona, and Cucamonga, California, and
various other production machinery and equipment providing $2,391
in total proceeds.  Uses of cash included $727 expended on
capital assets and $200 for a long-term note receivable taken as
part of the sale of the Chatsworth property, less $257 received
on a settlement of a long-term note receivable.  Finally, the
sale of Catel had a net positive impact on investing cash flows
of $1,529.

    3.   Outflows of $2,219 were used for financing activities. 
Reductions of long-term debt resulted from normal principal
payments on leases of $649, principal payments on other loans and
accrued interest associated with the Company's 7% Convertible
Subordinated Debentures of $1,500, and $1,239 in principal
payments on the term loan to Sanwa and the Industrial Development
Bonds pursuant to a sharing arrangement for net sales proceeds
from sales of certain non-operating assets.  Additional financing
proceeds include $1,091 received from foreign government grants
(actual proceeds based on capital and non-capital grant additions
as reflected by the change in the Company's grant receivable
balance).

    4.   Finally, the decline in the exchange rate of the
Company's foreign subsidiaries' functional currency, the British
Pound Sterling, from $1.91/1 pound sterling to $1.51/1 pound
sterling during the periods
ended June 30, 1992, and June 30, 1993, created a $200 decrease
in recorded cash.      

    In July 1993, the Company raised $3.45 million from the
exercise of warrants to purchase the Company's common stock (see
Note 5 to the accompanying financial statements).  In October,
1993, the Company and the Industrial Development Board for
Northern Ireland (the "IDB-NI") reached an agreement whereby the
IDB-NI purchased 450 shares of new series B convertible preferred
stock ("preferred stock") for an aggregate price of approximately
$675.  In April 1995, the preferred stock was converted into
340,841 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $2.02 per
common share and a value of $1,530 per preferred share, or a
total of $688.  Funds invested by the IDB-NI were used for
working capital and other needs of the Company's Northern Ireland
subsidiaries (The IDB-NI has previously provided grants for the
establishment and operation of Irlandus and DDL-E (see Note 11 to
the accompanying financial statements for additional information
regarding these grants).  In October 1994 the Company privately
placed 760,000 shares of its common stock with a foreign
investor.  The sale of stock was exempt from registration under
regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, and other available
exemptions.  Net proceeds from the transaction of $980 were used
for general operating purposes and to assist in the payoff of the
Company's senior debt.

    The Company currently has no working capital lines of credit
or other readily available sources for future borrowing.  The
Company's primary source of liquidity at June 30, 1995 is its
cash balances which amounted to $2,917. Approximately $2,427 of
this balance is held by the Company's Northern Ireland
subsidiaries, and are limited as to the timing and amount that
may be expatriated.  Components of working capital decreased by
$4,009 during the year ended June 30, 1995.  This decrease
resulted principally from a $2,024 reduction in accounts
receivable, a $1,566 decrease in inventories and prepaid expenses
and an increase of $413 in accounts payable and other accrued
costs. 

    The Company has approximately $3,000 of accrued liability
remaining from a restructuring charge taken in fiscal 1992. 
Primary components of this reserve consist of $2,694 reserved for
certain post-retirement and non-competition consulting agreements
("Agreements") with former officers and directors of the Company
and $310 reserved for remediation of the Company's former
Anaheim, California PCB manufacturing facility.  During fiscal
1995 amounts were added to these reserves raising the accrued
Agreements reserve to $3,255 and the Anaheim remediation reserve
to $810.  Increase in the Agreements reserve resulted from
complete and full accrual of all potential amounts owing to all
possible participants covered under the plans.  During fiscal
1995, the Company reached a non-binding agreement to exchange the
debt of participants under the Agreements for 600,000 warrants to
purchase common stock of the Company under certain defined
contract rights.  The initial impact of a completed transaction
would be a reduction of DDL's long term debt by approximately
$1,800 with the final impact of complete elimination of the
entire recorded liability (if the warrants are fully exercised). 
While the agreement is non-binding, the company expects it will
seek to consummate such a transaction in the current fiscal year. 


    Increase in the Anaheim remediation reserve resulted from new
preliminary estimates to remediate the Anaheim site to standards
expected by the Orange County Water Quality Control Board.  The
installation of water and soil extraction wells was completed in
August 1994.  A plan for soil remediation was completed about the
same time and was submitted to regulatory authorities.  The full
extent of potential ground water pollution could not be
determined given preliminary estimates.  The Company put out for
bid the complete remediation and testing of the site and retained
Harding Lawson and Associates in May of 1995 to begin the vapor
extraction of pollutant from the soil and to perform exploratory
hydro-punch testing to determine the full extent and potential
cost of the ground water contamination.  These processes are in
their preliminary stages and a complete and accurate estimate of
the full and potential costs cannot be determined at this time.  
The Company believes that the resolution of these matters will
require a significant cash outlay.  Initial estimates from
Harding Lawson indicate that it could cost as much as $3,000 to
fully clean-up the site and take over ten years to complete.  The
Company and Aeroscientific Corp. entered into an agreement to
share the costs of environmental remediation with the landlord at
the Anaheim facility.  Under this agreement, the Company is
obligated to pay 80% of the site's total remediation costs up to
$725 (i.e., up to the Company's share of $580) with any costs
above $725 being shared equally between the Company and the
landlord.  To date the Company has paid $239 as its share of the
remediation costs.  The Company anticipates that its share of the
final remediation cost will be less than or equal to the amount
it has presently reserved.

    On December 29, 1994 the Company successfully consummated an
integrated plan to pay off all of the Company's senior debt.  The
retirement of over $12,000 in debt was completed in conjunction
with the Company's sale of certain assets of its Aeroscientific
Corp. Oregon ("Oregon") subsidiary to Yamamoto Manufacturing
(USA), Inc. ("Yamamoto").  The termination agreements with Sanwa
Bank California ("Sanwa") covering Sanwa's term loan to the
Company, and The Tokai Bank Ltd. ("Tokai") for its letter of
credit issued to First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. ("IRB
Trustee"), as trustee for the state of Oregon on the Industrial
Revenue Bonds ("IRBs") issued by Oregon, eliminated all liens
that the senior lender had against the Company.  As described in
the Company's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on Form 8-K, on or about January 3, 1995, consideration for the
sale of Oregon's assets to Yamamoto included approximately $9,200
in cash and assumption by Yamamoto of approximately $300 of
capitalized lease obligations.  Oregon retained its trade
accounts receivable and trade accounts payable.

    As part of the pay off, Sanwa accepted a cash payment of 
$4,500 in full and complete satisfaction of outstanding debt owed
by the Company to Sanwa; such debt included approximately $6,848
of principal, approximately $93 of accrued but unpaid interest
and any other accrued but unpaid costs and expenses associated
with Sanwa's financing.  Sanwa's payoff was accounted for in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 15, 
"Accounting by Debtors and Creditors in Troubled Debt
Restructuring" (FAS 15).  Under FAS 15 the payoff resulted in an
extraordinary gain of $2,441, representing the difference between
Sanwa's outstanding balance and what was paid by the Company as
settlement.

    The Company offset the full $5,300 of IRBs through defeasance
and redeemed the bonds on February 1, 1995.  The defeased funds,
plus approximately $68 for prepaid interest, was invested in
treasury securities that provided a return slightly higher than
the interest charged on the defeased bonds.  The Company received
full return of the prepaid interest.  Both Tokai and the IRB
Trustee signed termination agreements that released all liens on
assets owned by the Company.

    The Company's ECM and PCB fabrication businesses require
continuing investment in plant and equipment to remain
competitive.  At the same time, the Company's financial position
has severely restricted its recent ability to make capital
investments in its facilities. Capital expenditures during fiscal
1995, 1994 and 1993 were approximately $547, $614 and $684,
respectively (net of grant reimbursements of $97 and $43, in
fiscal 1994 and 1993, respectively).  The Company anticipates it
will need to increase its capital spending in the coming years in
order to stay competitive as technology improves.

    On December 31, 1992, holders of $4,826 principal amount of
the Company's 7% CSDs and $3,183 principal amount of its 8 1/2%
CSDs
exchanged the CSDs for common stock and warrants to purchase
common stock in the future and eliminated the interest payment
due November 16, 1992, on the exchanged 7% CSDs.  The exchanges
resulted in the issuance of 4,704,562 shares of common stock and
2,316,889 warrants to purchase common stock.  In May and June of
1993, the Company consummated additional exchanges with holders
of $585 principal amount of the 7% CSDs and $111 principal amount
of the 8 1/2% CSDs, resulting in the issuance of an additional
329,574 shares of common stock and 276,768 warrants, which
warrants had the same characteristics as those previously issued. 
The Company may effect similar exchanges with holders of the
remaining outstanding debentures in the future.  The warrants
were exercisable at $1.50 per share until July 31, 1993, after
which the exercise price increased to $2.25 per share until the
October 31, 1994, which was extended until August 1, 1995.  More
recently the Company's Board of Directors extended the exercise
period to December 29, 1995, and reduced the exercise price to
$1.42/share.  The Company can accelerate the termination date of
the warrants if the average closing market price of the Common
Stock for 10 business days within any 20 business-day trading
period is at least $3.00 per share.  The warrants are separately
tradable.  Reference is made to Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for a description of the accounting
treatment of the exchange.  In July 1993, 2,370,155 warrants were
exercised, generating net cash proceeds to the Company of
approximately $3,455; 223,500 warrants remain outstanding.

    In June 1995, the Company filed for approximately $2,300 in
refunds (net of certain expenses) with the Internal Revenue
Service associated with the carry back of certain net operating
loss (NOL) expense items in accordance with Sec. 172(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code.  The Company is presently awaiting these
refunds and has not recorded such amounts on the financial
statements.  

    The achievement of operating profitability is the most
significant internal factor to ensure the Company's long-term
viability.  No assurance can be given that the Company will
maintain operating profitability, or that cash generated from
non-operating asset sales or other means will be adequate to fund
future cash needs.  In the current competitive environment,
management believes that the liquidation value of its assets in a
voluntary or involuntary liquidation would be insufficient to
meet the Company's debt obligations.

<PAGE>
                         Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
DDL Electronics, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
DDL Electronics, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1995 and 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
the years then ended.  These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our
audits.  The accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows of DDL Electronics, Inc. an
subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 1993 were audited 
by other auditors whose report thereon, dated
August 20, 1993, expressed an unqualified opinion on those 
statements and included an explanatory paragraph indicating
there is substantial doubt concerning the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards.  Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement
presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.  In our
opinion, the 1995 and 1994 consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of DDL
Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 1995 and 1994, and the results of their operations and
cash flows for the year then
ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. 

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
in 1994 the Company adopted
the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's
Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes".  



/S/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
- ------------------------
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
August 18, 1995

<PAGE>



                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Consolidated Balance Sheets
                    (In thousands, except share amount)

                                                       June 30
       Assets                                    1995        1994

Current assets:
  Cash and cash equivalents                    $ 2,917      $ 2,540
  Accounts receivable (note 3)                   3,600        5,600
  Inventories (note 4)                           2,188        3,647
  Prepaid expenses                                 171          231
                                                ------       ------
       Total current assets                      8,876       12,018

Property, equipment and improvements,
  at cost (notes 5 and 11):
  Land                                             -          1,101
  Buildings and improvements                      5,217       8,670
  Plant equipment                                 9,486      22,499
  Office and other equipment                      1,268       1,508
  Construction in progress                          -            60
                                                 ------       ------
                                                 15,971       33,838

Less:  Accumulated depreciation and
 amortization                                   (12,662)     (23,196)
                                                 ------       ------
Property, equipment and improvements, net         3,309       10,642

Other assets                                        405          598
                                                 ------       ------

                                                 $12,590     $23,258
                                                  ======      ======




<PAGE>


                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Consolidated Balance Sheets
                    (In thousands, except share amount)

                                                             June 30
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit)           1995        1994

Current liabilities:
  Current portion of long-term debt (note 5)          $   633     $13,524
  Accounts payable                                      5,283       5,086
  Accrued payroll and employee benefits                   601         994
  Other accrued liabilities                             2,387       1,673
                                                       ------      ------
       Total current liabilities                        8,904      21,277

Long-term debt (note 5)                                 7,030       6,870

Commitments and contingencies (note 11)

Stockholders  equity (deficit) (notes 5 and 8):
  Convertible series B preferred stock, $1 par value; 
  1,000,000 shares authorized; 450 shares 
  issued and outstanding at June_30, 1994 
  (with liquidation preference at June 30, 1994
   of $688,500 over all other classes or series
   of capital stock)                                      -           -
  Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
  authorized; 16,062,979 and 14,468,718 shares 
  outstanding at June 30, 1995 and 1994, respectively    161         145
Additional paid-in capital                            20,983      19,646
Accumulated deficit                                  (23,598)    (23,673)
Foreign currency translation adjustment                 (890)     (1,007)
                                                      ------       ------
            Total stockholders  deficit               (3,344)     (4,889)
                                                      ------       ------
                                                     $12,590     $23,258
                                                      ======      ======


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  



<PAGE>

                DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Consolidated Statements of Operations
          (In thousands except per share and share amounts)

                                                      Year ended June 30
                                                1995         1994      1993

  Sales                                       $29,576     $48,529      $57,883

Costs and expenses:
  Cost of goods sold                           26,516      47,860       55,052
  Administrative and selling expenses           6,497       7,617        7,898
  Restructuring charges (note 2)                1,533         -             - 
                                               ------      ------       ------
                                               34,546      55,477       62,950
                                               ------      ------       ------
       Operating loss                          (4,970)     (6,948)      (5,067)
Non-operating income (expense):
  Investment income                               109         168          280
  Interest expense                               (883)     (1,110)      (1,107)
  Earthquake expenses                              -         (500)          -
  Gain on sale of assets                        3,317           2          264
  Other income                                     61          34           - 
                                               ------      ------       ------
                                                2,604      (1,406)        (563)
                                               ------       ------       ------
  Loss from continuing 
  operations before income taxes               (2,366)     (8,354)      (5,630)

Benefit (provision) for income taxes (note 6)      -          -           -
                                               ------      ------       ------
  Loss from continuing operations              (2,366)     (8,354)      (5,630)

Gain from discontinued operations (note 10)        -            -          603
                                               ------      ------       ------
  Loss before extraordinary item               (2,366)     (8,354)      (5,027)

Extraordinary item - 
  Gain on debt extinguishment (note 5)          2,441           -        6,100
                                               ------      ------       ------

       Net income (loss)                      $    75     $(8,354)     $ 1,073
                                               ======       ======       ======


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>


                                                      Year ended June 30
                                                1995         1994        1993
Primary income (loss) per share:
  Continuing operations                       $(0.15)     $(0.55)      $(0.56)
  Discontinued operations                         -            -         0.06
  Extraordinary item                            0.15           -         0.60
                                               -----        -----       -----
        Net income (loss)                     $   -       $(0.55)      $ 0.10
                                               =====        =====       =====

Fully diluted income (loss) per share:
  Continuing operations                       $(0.15)     $(0.55)      $(0.37)
  Discontinued operations                         -            -         0.04
  Extraordinary item                            0.15           -         0.42
                                               -----        -----       -----
          Net income (loss)                   $   -       $(0.55)      $ 0.09
                                               =====        =====        =====

Shares used in computing income (loss) per common 
  and common equivalent share:
    Primary                                 15,970,517   15,097,175   10,128,680
    Fully diluted                           16,907,165   15,856,906   14,408,973

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  


<PAGE>
            DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
             (In thousands, except share amounts)

                                                       Year ended June 30,
                                          1995            1994         1993
                                      
Cash flows from operating activities:
  Net income (loss)                     $    75        $(8,354)     $ 1,073
  adjustments to reconcile net loss to 
  net cash used by operating activities:
   Depreciation and amortization           1,505         3,120        3,616
   Gain on debt extinguishment            (2,441)         -          (6,100)
   Gain on sale of property and other 
assets                                    (3,317)          (2)         (264)
   Gain on disposal of discontinued 
operations                                   -              -          (603)
   Value of variable stock options granted   -              6           345
   Net decrease in operating working 
        capital (note 9)                   4,009        2,648            96
   (Increase) decrease in deposits and 
        other assets                          2            27         (424)
   Non-cash pension charge                   42             -        1,387
   Benefit of non-capital grants           (139)         (150)        (361)
   Other                                     -             (5)          -
                                          ------         ------       ------
 Net cash used by operating activities     (264)       (2,710)      (1,235)
                                      
Cash flows from investing activities:
  Capital expenditures                     (547)         (711)        (727)
  Proceeds from disposition of capital 
                                assets    9,936            18        2,391
  Additions to note receivable              -               -          257
  Long-term notes added                     -               -         (200)
  Net effect from disposal of 
      discontinued operations               -               -         1,529
                                        ------           ------       ------
 Net cash provided (used) by 
      investing activities                9,389           (693)       3,250
                                      
Cash flows (used) provided by 
      financing activities:
  Proceeds from long-term debt              612            272          114
  Reductions of long-term debt          (10,819)        (1,633)      (3,436)
  Net proceeds from exercise of 
stock warrants                              -            3,455           -
  Proceeds from stock option exercise       287             94           15
  Issuance of series B preferred stock       -             675           -
  Proceeds from foreign government grants   202            268        1,091
  Issuance of common stock                  980             -            -
  Other                                      -              -            (3)
                                          ------          ------       ------
 Net cash provided (used) by 
      financing activities                (8,738)         3,131       (2,219)
                                          ------         ------       ------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash      (10)            44         (200)
                                          ------          ------       ------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash 
equivalents                                  377            (228)        (404)
Cash and cash equivalents at 
beginning of period                        2,540           2,768        3,172
                                          ------          ------       ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end 
of period                                $ 2,917          $2,540      $ 2,768
                                          ======          ======       ======

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  
                                                                 
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
                    DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
            Consolidated Statements of Stockholders  Equity
(Deficit)
                   Years ended June_30, 1995, 1994 and 1993
                     (In thousands except share amounts)          
                              
                                                            
                         Common Stock      Preferred stock        
                    
                        --------------     --------------- 
<S>           <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>     
<C>       <C>              <C>       <C>                          
                           Foreign
                                                              
Additional               currency        Total
                                   Par                 Par    
paid-in  Accumulated  translation   stockholders'
                         Shares   value*   Shares     value*  
capital    deficit    adjustment  equity (deficit) 

Bal. at June 30, 1992    6,863,244  $  69     -      $   -    $
9,138    $(16,392)    $   902      $(6,283)

Net income                    -        -      -          -        
- -        1,073          -         1,073
Sales of stock and restrict-
 ed stock transactions      (6,000)    -      -          -        
(3)         -           -            (3)
Conversion of 7% subordinated 
 debentures                 59,500      1     -          -       
118          -           -           119
Exchanges of 7% and 8-1/2% 
 subordinated debentures 5,034,136     50     -          -     
5,767          -           -         5,817
Exercise of stock options   22,000     -      -          -        
15          -           -            15
Compensation expense on stock
  option grants               -        -      -          -       
345          -           -           345
Translation adjustments       -        -      -          -        
- -           -       (2,026)      (2,026)
                        ----------   ----   ----      -----    
- ------     ------      ------       ------
Bal. at June 30, 1993   11,972,880    120     -          -     
15,380    (15,319)     (1,124)        (943)

Net loss                      -        -      -          -        
 -      (8,354)         -        (8,354)
Exercise of warrants     2,370,148     24     -          -      
3,431         -           -         3,455
Issuance of preferred stock   -        -     450         -        
675         -           -           675
Conversion of 7% subordinated 
  debentures                30,500     -      -          -        
 61         -           -            61
Exercise of stock options   95,190      1     -          -        
 93         -           -            94
Compensation expense on stock
  option grants               -        -      -          -        
  6         -           -             6
Translation adjustments       -        -      -          -        
  -         -          117          117
                        ----------   ----   ----      -----     
- ------    ------      ------       ------
Bal. at June 30, 1994   14,468,718    145    450         -      
19,646   (23,673)     (1,007)      (4,889)

Net income                    -        -      -          -        
  -         75          -            75
Issuance of common stock   760,000      8     -          -        
 972         -          -           980
Conversion of 7% 
subordinated debentures     43,000      -     -          -        
  86         -          -            86
Exercise of stock options  450,447      5     -          -        
 282         -          -           287
Shares retired                 (27)     -     -          -        
  -          -          -            -
Conversion of Series B
 preferred stock to common 340,841      3   (450)        -        
  (3)        -          -            -
Translation adjustments       -         -     -          -        
   -         -         117          117
                        ----------   ----   ----      -----     
- ------    ------      ------       ------
Bal. at June 30, 1995   16,062,979  $ 161     -      $   -     
$20,983  $(23,598)    $  (890)     $(3,344)

*   Par Value  numbers restated for change in par value from
$.33-1/3 per share to $.01 per share.  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  
                                                                  
                                    
<PAGE>
                                   
                 DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                  (In thousands except share amounts)
                                    

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DDL
Electronics, Inc. ("DDL")
and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company").  All
significant intercompany transactions
and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.  During 1995,
the Company sold
substantially all of the assets of its domestic subsidiaries.  

ACCOUNTING PERIOD

The Company utilizes a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the
Friday closest to June 30
which, for fiscal years 1995 and 1994, fell on June_30 and July
1, respectively.  In these
consolidated financial statements, the fiscal year-end for all
years is shown as June 30 for
clarity of presentation.

INVENTORIES

Manufacturing inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net
realizable value, with cost
determined principally by use of the first-in, first-out method.  

PLANT, EQUIPMENT, AND IMPROVEMENTS

Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line
and declining balance
methods.  The principal estimated useful lives are:  buildings -
20 years; improvements - 10
years; plant, office, and other equipment - 3 to 7 years.  Upon
the retirement of assets, costs
and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the
accounts and any gain or
loss is included in income.  Plant and equipment acquired by
DDL's foreign subsidiaries are
recorded net of capital grants received from the Industrial
Development Board for Northern
Ireland.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of products.

  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                 DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                  (In thousands except share amounts)
                                    
INCOME TAXES

Effective July 1, 1993, the Company adopted, on a prospective
basis, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No._109(FAS 109), "Accounting for Income
Taxes".  FAS 109 is an
asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities
for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the
Company's financial statements or tax returns.  In estimating
future tax consequences, FAS
109 generally considers all expected future events other than
enactments of changes in tax
law or statutorily imposed rates.  Previously, the Company used
the FAS 96 asset and liability
approach that gave no recognition to future events other than the
recovery of assets and
settlement of liabilities at their carrying amounts.  Under FAS
109, the Company recognizes
to a greater degree the future tax benefits of expenses
recognized in the financial statements. 
There was no cumulative effect with the adoption of FAS 109.

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Primary income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding and common stock
equivalents.  The
determination of common stock equivalents assumes exercise of
those outstanding stock
options and warrants to purchase stock that have a dilutive
effect on net income per share
(calculated by the treasury stock method).  Fully diluted income
per share includes the
assumed conversion of the convertible subordinated debentures and
warrants if the effect on
income per share is dilutive.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The financial statements of DDL's Northern Ireland subsidiaries
have been translated into U.S.
dollars from their functional currency, British pounds sterling,
in the accompanying statements
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 52.   Balance sheet
amounts have been translated at the exchange rate on the balance
sheet date and income
statement amounts have been translated at average exchange rates
in effect during the period. 
The net translation adjustment is carried as a component of
stockholders' equity (deficit).  

CASH EQUIVALENTS

For financial reporting purposes, cash equivalents consist
primarily of money market
instruments and bank certificates of deposit that have original
maturities of three months or
less.


  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                    (In thousands except share amounts)
                                      

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk
consist principally of money market instruments and trade
receivables.  The Company invests
its excess cash in money market instruments and certificates of
deposit with high credit
quality financial institutions and, by policy, limits the amount
of credit exposure to any one
issuer.  Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
receivables exist because the
Company's electronic contract manufacturing ("ECM") and printed
circuit board ("PCB")
fabrication facilities rely heavily on a relatively small number
of customers.  The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and
generally does not require collateral. 
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses and
such losses, to date, have
been within management's expectations.  

CHANGES IN CLASSIFICATION

Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal 1994 and
1993 financial statements to
conform with the financial statement presentation for fiscal
1995.  Such reclassifications had
no effect on the Company's results of operations or stockholders'
equity (deficit).  

Note 2 - RESTRUCTURING COSTS AND PRIVISION FOR LOSS ON DISPOSAL
OF
ASSETS 

On September_1, 1994, the Company s Board of Directors approved a
plan to shut-down and
dispose of its A.J. Electronics, Inc. subsidiary (A.J.).  In
conjunction with this plan, the
Company recorded restructuring liabilities, aggregating $1,173 in
the second quarter and
increased its estimate in the fourth quarter to $1,533, for the
expenses associated with the shut
down and disposal of the assets of A.J.; including asset
write-downs of $552, additional bad
debt write-offs of $136, lease termination costs of $211 and all
other exit costs totaling $664. 
Substantially all of the operating assets of A.J. were sold on
January_17, 1995 for a total
consideration, in the form of cash and debt assumption, of
approximately $1,041.  During the
year, the Company has made cash payments of $278 for
restructuring related items resulting
in a restructuring reserve at June_30, 1995 of $494.

The Company has an accrued liability of approximately $3,000
remaining from a restructuring
charge incurred in fiscal 1992.  Primary components of this
reserve consist of $2,694 reserved
for certain post-retirement and non-competition consulting
agreements ( Agreements ) with
former officers and directors of the Company and $500 originally
accrued, of which $310
remained at June_30, 1995, for remediation of the Company's
former Anaheim, California
PCB manufacturing facility.  During fiscal 1995 amounts were
added to these reserves raising
the accrued Agreements reserve to $3,255 and the Anaheim
remediation reserve to $810. 
Increase in the Agreements reserve resulted from complete and
full accrual of all potential
amounts owing to all possible participants covered under the
plans.  

  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                    (In thousands except share amounts)


Note 3 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The components of accounts receivable are as follows:
                                                        June 30, 
                                                   1995         
1994

  Trade receivables                              $ 3,511       $
5,578
  Other receivables                                  270          
555
  Less allowance for doubtful accounts              (181)        
(533)
                                                  ------       
- ------
                                                 $ 3,600       $
5,600
                                                  ======       
======

Included in other receivables at June 30, 1995, and 1994 are
grants due from the Industrial
Development Board for Northern Ireland ("IDB-NI") of $140 and
$214, respectively (see note
11).  

Note 4 - INVENTORIES

Inventories are comprised of the following:

                                                      June 30, 
                                                   1995         
1994

  Raw materials                                  $ 1,634       $
3,167
  Work in process                                    710          
864
  Less reserves                                     (156)        
(384)
                                                  ------       
- ------
                                                 $ 2,188       $
3,647
                                                  ======       
======



<PAGE>
                      DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                       (In thousands except share amounts)


Note 5 - FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

                                                         June 30,
                                                    1995         
1994

  Industrial revenue bonds                        $   -         $
5,300
  Notes payable, secured by the plant and 
    buildings at the Northern Ireland opera-
    tions at variable rates (9.5% at June 30,
    1995), due in 30 semiannual installments
    of principal and interest                      1,346         
1,353
  Bank term loan payable                              -          
6,848
  Capitalized lease obligations (note 11)            124          
 880
  8 1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures,
    due 2008, interest payable semi-annually 
    convertible at holders option at a conver-
    sion price of $10 5/8 per share at any time
    prior to maturity.  Redeemable by the Company
    at 103.4% of the principal amount during the
    12 months ended July_31, 1995 and subsequent-
    ly at prices declining to 100% at August_1,
    1998, and thereafter                           1,580         
1,580
  7% Convertible Subordinated Debentures, due 
    2001, interest payable semi-annually conver-
    tible at holders option at a conversion 
    price of $2.00 per share at any time prior 
    to maturity                                      653          
 813
  Post retirement non-competition and consulting 
    program (note 7)                               3,255         
2,694
  Other                                              705          
 926
                                                  ------        
- ------
                                                   7,663        
20,394

  Less current maturities                            633        
13,524
                                                  ------        
- ------
                                                 $ 7,030        $
6,870
                                                  ======        
======
The aggregate amounts of minimum maturities of long-term debt for
the indicated fiscal years
(other than capitalized lease obligations, as described in note
11) are as follows:  1996_-
$568; 1997 - $112; 1998 - $120; 1999 - $269; 2000 - $106; and
thereafter $6,364.


  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                      DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                       (In thousands except share amounts)
                                         

During the second quarter of 1995, the Company successfully
consummated an integrated
plan to pay off $5,300 of 4.2% industrial revenue bonds (IRB s)
due 2006 and $6,941 of
Sanwa bank term loan, interest at Sanwa s prime lending rate, due
May_1, 1995.  The
retirement of this debt was completed in conjunction with the
Company s sale of certain
assets of its Aeroscientific Corp. Oregon subsidiary
(Aero-Oregon) for proceeds of
approximately $9,200 in cash and the assumption by the purchaser
of approximately $300 of
capitalized lease obligations.  As part of the pay off, Sanwa
accepted a cash payment of
$4,500 in complete satisfaction of the Company s debt to Sanwa
resulting in an extraordinary
gain of $2,441.  The sale of the Aero Oregon assets resulted in a
gain of approximately
$3,317.  

During 1993, pursuant to privately negotiated transactions,
holders of $5,411 in principal of
7% Convertible Subordinated Debentures (CSDs) and $3,294 in
principal of 8 1/2% CSDs
exchanged the CSDs for units consisting of common stock and
warrants to purchase common
stock.  The exchanges resulted in the issuance of 5,034,136
shares of common stock and
2,593,657 warrants to purchase common stock (see note 8).  On
July_31, 1993, holders of
91% of the outstanding warrants exercised such warrants
generating net cash proceeds of
approximately $3,445 which resulted in an extraordinary gain of
approximately $6,100.  

During 1995, 1994 and 1993, holders of $ 86, $61 and $119,
respectively, in principal of 7%
CSDs exchanged such CSDs for 43,000, 30,500 and 59,500 shares,
respectively, of common
stock pursuant to the conversion features of the related
indenture.  Accrued undiscounted
future interest related to the converted bonds was credited to
income.   



  (Continued)

<PAGE>
                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                     (In thousands except share amounts)

Note 6 - INCOME TAXES

Temporary differences between financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax bases of
assets and liabilities that give rise to significant portions of
the U.S. deferred tax assets and
liabilities relate to the following:

                                           June 30,        June 30,
                                             1995            1994

Deferred tax assets:
  Accrued employee benefits              $  1,228          1,066
  Warranty and loss reserves                  780            594
  Net operating loss carryforwards         19,890         20,358
  Other                                       148            588
                                           ------          ------
          Total gross deferred tax assets  22,046          22,606

Less valuation allowance                  (20,846)        (21,330)
                                           ------          ------
          Net deferred tax assets           1,200           1,276

Deferred tax liabilities:
  Plant and equipment, principally due to 
    differences in depreciation           $ (1,200)        (1,259)
  Other                                       -               (17)
                                            ------         ------
Total gross deferred tax liabilities       (1,200)         (1,276)
                                            ------          ------

          Net deferred tax asset         $    -                -
                                            ======           ======



  (Continued)

<PAGE>
                      DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                       (In thousands except share amounts)


The provision (benefit) for income taxes attributable to loss
from continuing operations differs
from an amount computed using the statutory federal income tax
rate as follows: 
                                                             June 30,
                                        1995               1994          1993

  Expected statutory federal tax      $  (804)           $(2,840)     $(1,914)
  Change in valuation allowance           804              2,840        1,914
                                       ------              ------       ------
                                    $    -                $  -         $  -
                                       ======              ======       ======

Pretax income (loss) from foreign operations for fiscal 1995,
1994, and 1993 was $443,
$(5,430), $(1,959),  respectively.

Income of Irlandus Circuits Limited, one of the Company's
Northern Ireland subsidiaries, is
sheltered by United Kingdom net operating loss carryforwards (the
"NOL").  The income tax
benefit from the NOL was  $- 0 -, $455, and $173, in fiscal 1995,
1994, and 1993,
respectively, which, in accordance with FAS No. 109, has been
treated as a reduction in the
provision for income taxes.  At June 30, 1995, the NOL amounted
to approximately $7,800
for income tax purposes.  Substantially all of these net
operating losses from prior years can
be carried forward by Irlandus for an indefinite period of time
to reduce future taxable
income.  In addition, future income of DDL Electronics Limited,
the Company's other
Northern Ireland operating company, is sheltered by an NOL which
amounted to $3,200 for
income tax purposes.

At June 30, 1995 the Company's valuation allowance was comprised
mostly of NOL
carryforwards generated during prior years.  The valuation
allowance decreased from the end
of fiscal 1994 by $484, primarily due to effects of asset sales
and current operations.  

As of June_30, 1995, the Company has U.S. federal and state NOL
carryforwards of $36,815
and $27,802, respectively, expiring in 2003 through 2010.  The
alternative minimum tax is
imposed at a 20% rate on a corporation's alternative minimum
taxable income which is
determined by making statutory adjustments to a corporation's
regular taxable income. 
Alternative minimum tax NOL carryforwards may be used to offset
only 90% of a
corporation's alternative minimum taxable income.  The NOL
carryforward for federal
alternative minimum tax purposes is approximately $28,539.  

  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                  DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                    (In thousands except share amounts)


The Company s ability to use its NOL carryforwards to offset
future taxable income is subject
to annual restrictions contained in the United States Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code).  These restrictions act to limit the
Company's future use of its NOL's
following certain substantial stock ownership changes enumerated
in the Code and referred to
hereinafter as an  ownership change .  Utilization of NOLs
incurred through July 1993
became limited due to an ownership change.  NOLs incurred
subsequent to July 1993 are not
subject to limitation.  The amount of the NOL carryforward
subject to limitation is
approximately $27,764.  The annual limitation is approximately
$1,222.
  
No provision was made for U.S. or additional foreign taxes on
undistributed earnings of the
Company's foreign subsidiaries as those earnings are reinvested. 
It is not practicable to
estimate the amount of tax that might be payable on the eventual
remittance of such earnings. 
On remittance, the United Kingdom imposes withholding taxes that
would then be available
for use as a credit against the U.S. tax liability, if any,
subject to certain limitations.   

Note 7 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has a post-retirement non-competition and consulting
program whereby key
employees may, at the Company's discretion, be offered payment
for their agreement not to
compete with the Company and for consulting services to be
rendered after retirement.  In
addition, the former employee must agree to be supportive of the
Company and to refrain
from any actions or statements that are adverse to the Company's
interest.  The
non-competition and consulting period is typically 10 years,
commencing at date of
retirement.  Consideration is paid in equal installments over 120
months.  Future payments to
retirees pursuant to this plan have been accrued with additional
amounts recorded in 1995 for
an added participant and to increase the reserve for director
emeritus fees and contract costs. 
Amounts owing are included in long-term debt (see note 5).  The
Company and the program
participants have agreed to defer payments made under the program
due to the Company's
deteriorating cash position.  Interest at prime rate is accrued
quarterly on deferred amounts. 
Program payments will resume at such time as the Board of
Directors determines that the
Company's cash position can support further payments.  


  (Continued)
<PAGE
                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
             (In thousands except share and per share amounts)



Note 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

STOCK OPTION PLANS

The 1993 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1993 Non-employee Stock
Option Plan (the 1993
Plans) provide for the granting to employees and directors of
incentive stock options, and for
granting of non-statutory stock options to directors and
consultants.  Subject to the discretion
of the Board of Directors, options granted under the 1993 Plans
generally vest and become
exercisable at the rate of 1/3 per year and have a 10 year term. 
The 1993 Non-employee
Stock Option Plan was terminated in fiscal 1995.  

The exercise price of all incentive stock options granted under
the 1993 Plans must be equal
to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.  The
exercise price of all
non-statutory stock options granted under the 1993 Plans must be
at least 85% of the fair
market values of the shares on the date of grant.  

Activity under the 1993 Plans for years 1993, 1994 and 1995 is as
follows:

                                                Shares         
Price per share

Shares under option, June 30, 1992            1,302,937        $ 
 .50  -  $ 7.12

Granted                                         738,072          
 .50  -    2.38
Forfeited                                      (335,416)         
 .69  -    7.12
Exercised                                       (22,000)         
 .69  -     .69
                                              ---------        
- -----      -----
Shares under option, June 30, 1993            1,683,593          
 .50  -    4.88

Granted                                         501,973          
 .50  -    1.88
Forfeited                                      (225,810)         
 .69  -    4.88
Exercised                                       (95,190)         
 .69  -    1.38
                                              ---------        
- -----      -----
Shares under option, June 30, 1994            1,864,566          
 .50  -    4.88

Granted                                         120,000         
1.13  -    1.38
Forfeited                                      (177,500)        
1.38  -    2.38
Exercised                                      (450,447)         
 .50  -    1.06
                                              ---------        
- -----      -----
Shares under option, June 30, 1995            1,356,619        $ 
 .50  -  $ 4.88
                                              =========        
=====      =====

At June 30, 1995, options for 1,240,230 shares were exercisable
and there were 308,027
shares available for future grants.  


  (Continued)
<PAGE>

                 DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
            (In thousands except share and per share amounts)
                                    

Series A Participating Junior Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
- -------------------------------------------------------------

1,000 preferred stock purchase rights, which may be exercised to
purchase one-hundredth of a
share of Series A Participating Junior Preferred Stock at a
purchase price of $30.00, subject to
adjustment, are outstanding at June_30, 1995.  The rights may be
exercised only after
commencement or public announcement that a person (other than a
person receiving prior
approval from the Company) has acquired or obtained the right to
acquire 20% or more of the
Company's outstanding common stock.  The rights, which do not
have voting rights, may be
redeemed by the Company at a price of $.01 per right within ten
days after the announcement
that a person has acquired 20% or more of the outstanding common
stock of the Company
and the redemption period may be extended under certain
circumstances.  In the event that
the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination
transaction, provision
shall be made so that each holder of a right shall have the right
to receive that number of
shares of common stock of the surviving company which at the time
of the transaction would
have a market value of two times the exercise price of the right. 
150,000 shares of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value are
authorized.  

Warrants
- --------

The following warrants are outstanding at June_30, 1995:

      1.    223,500 warrants to purchase common stock at $2.25
per share until August 1,
1995.  In July, 1995, the Board of Directors approved a change in
exercise price to $1.42 per
share and extended the exercise period to December_29, 1995.  The
Company can accelerate
the termination date of the warrants if the average closing
market price of the common stock  
for 10 business days within any 20 business day trading period is
at least $3.00 per share.  
The warrants are separately tradable.  
      
      2.    100,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $1.31
per share until May_24, 1997. 



  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                      DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                        (In thousands except share amounts)


Note 9 - INFORMATION RELATING TO CONCOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS

"Net cash provided (used) by operating activities" includes cash
payments for interest:

                                               June 30,
                                       1995        1994       1993

  Interest paid                     $   883     $1,100    $ 1,220

"Net decrease in operating working capital" is comprised of the
following (changes in
operating working capital accounts may not equal differences
derived by comparing balance
sheet accounts due to fluctuations in the exchange rate between
reported balance sheet dates):

                                                             June 30,
                                                    1995       1994       1993

  Decrease in accounts receivable                 $ 2,030     $3,604    $ 2,077
  (Increase) decrease in inventories                1,504      3,404     (1,423)
  (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses              62        881       (574)
  Increase (decrease) in accounts payable             111     (4,678)       793
  Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll
    and employee benefits                            (406)      (178)       130
  Increase (decrease) in other liabilities            708       (385)      (907)
                                                   ------     ------     ------
          Net decrease                            $ 4,009     $2,648    $    96
                                                   ======     ======     ======

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:

                                                             June 30,
                                                    1995       1994       1993

  Capital expenditures financed by lease
    obligations                                   $    96     $   94    $   124
  7% CSDs converted to equity                          86         61        119
  Market Value of equity and warrants 
    exchanged for 7% and 8 1/2% CSDs                   -           -      5,817
  Reduction of long-term debt resulting 
    from exchanges of CSDs                             -           -     12,191
  Conversion of preferred stock for 
    common stock                                        3          -         -


  (Continued)

<PAGE>
                      DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                       (In thousands except share amounts)


Note 10 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Communications Business

The Company's Catel Telecommunications, Inc. ("Catel")
subsidiary, which was engaged in
the manufacture of broadband telecommunications equipment for the
cable television and
telecommunication markets, was sold effective June 30, 1993. 
Operating results for this
discontinued business is excluded from the Consolidated Statement
of Operations to present
separately the results of continuing operations.  The results for
this entity are summarized as
follows:

                                                                  June 30, 1993
    Net sales                                                       
                                                                      $ 5,374
                                                                       ======
  Loss from operation of discontinued subsidiary                     $  (769)
  Offset of discontinued subsidiary loss                                 769
  Gain on disposal of discontinued operation                             603
                                                                       ------
                                                                     $   603
                                                                       ======

Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies

Future minimum lease payments at June 30, 1995, were as follows:

                                                     Capital     Operating
                                                       leases     leases

  Fiscal 1996                                         $    78     $    71
  Fiscal 1997                                              91          77
  Fiscal 1998                                              17          53
                                                        -----       -----
          Total                                       $   186     $   201
                                                        =====       =====

The present value of future minimum capital lease payments at
June 30, 1995, was $124. 
The capitalized cost of the related assets (primarily plant
equipment), which are pledged as
security under the leases, was $359 and $1,522 at June 30, 1995,
and 1994, respectively. 
Accumulated amortization on assets under capital leases amounted
to $237 and $767 at June
30, 1995 and 1994, respectively. 


  (Continued)

<PAGE>
                      DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                       (In thousands except share amounts)


Rental expense for operating leases amounted to $238, $478, and
$363, for fiscal 1995, 1994,
and 1993, respectively.  The Company's principal operating leases
are renewable at the fair
rental value on the expiration dates. 

Through June 30, 1995, the IDB-NI has reimbursed the Company for
qualifying capital
expenditures and for certain employment and interest costs in the
aggregate amount of $6,073. 
Approximately $3,486 of the government grants received by the
Company remain subject to
repayment terms if goals as to growth and employment levels are
not achieved and
maintained.

Federal, state, and local provisions relating to the protection
of the environment affect the
Company's printed circuit board fabrication operations.  The
Company's printed circuit board
plants generate hazardous waste, some of which is treated on site
and some of which is
removed from the Company's facilities and disposed of elsewhere
by arrangement with the
owners or operators of disposal sites.  The Company's
Aeroscientific-Anaheim subsidiary has
received notice from the United States Environmental Protection
Agency that it is regarded as
a potentially responsible party ("PRP") under federal
environmental laws in connection with a
waste disposal Site known as the "Stringfellow Superfund site" in
Riverside County,
California, which is presently being considered by governmental
authorities for remediation. 
Aeroscientific has been named as a third party defendant by other
PRPs in a case brought by
the United States Government concerning this site. 
Aeroscientific has also been named as a
defendant together with a large number of PRPs in a civil action
filed by the residents and
homeowners adjacent to the Stringfellow site.  The information
developed during discovery
and investigation thus far indicates that Aeroscientific supplied
relatively small amounts of
waste to the site as compared to the many other defendants. As
part of the currently 
proposed Settlement Agreement, small polluters would pay a fixed
amount plus an amount
that varies based on volume of material dumped at the site. 
Under these guidelines, the
Company's probable liability will be $120.  Final settlement and
timing of payment are
currently indeterminable, and no assurances can be given that any
settlement will be achieved. 
The Company, however, has accrued a sufficient liability to cover
the proposed settlement as
of fiscal year end 1995.  Any further remedial costs or damage
awards in these cases may be
significant and management believes that the Company's allocated
share of such costs or
damages could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business or financial
condition.  The actions are still in the pre-trial and discovery
stages and a prediction of
outcome is difficult.  There is, as in the case of most
environmental litigation, the theoretical
possibility of joint and several liability being imposed upon
Aeroscientific for damages which
may be awarded.  Total estimated cleanup costs for the
Stringfellow site have been estimated
at $600,000.  The Company's possible range of liability is
indeterminable, and the reliability
and precision of estimated cleanup costs are subject to a myriad
of factors which are not
currently measurable.


  (Continued)
<PAGE>
                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                    (In thousands except share amounts)


The Company is aware of certain chemicals that exist in the
ground at its previously leased
facility at 1240-1244 South Claudina Street, Anaheim, California. 
The Company has notified
the appropriate governmental agencies and is proceeding with
remediation and investigative
studies regarding soil and groundwater contamination.  The
Company believes that it will be
required to implement a continuing remedial program for the site,
the cost of which is
currently unknown.  The installation of water and soil extraction
wells was completed in
August 1994.  A plan for soil remediation was completed about the
same time and was
submitted to regulatory authorities.  The full extent of
potential ground water pollution could
not be determined given preliminary estimates.  The Company
retained the services of
Harding Lawson and Associates in May of 1995 to begin the vapor
extraction of pollutant
from the soil and to perform exploratory hydro-punch  testing to
determine the full extent and
cost of the potential ground water contamination.  These
processes are in their preliminary
stages and a complete and accurate estimate of the full and
potential costs cannot be
determined at this time.  The Company believes that the
resolution of these matters will
require a significant cash outlay.  Initial estimates form
Harding Lawson indicate that it could
cost as much as $3,000 to fully clean-up the site and take over
ten years to complete.  The
Company and Aeroscientific Corp. entered into an agreement to
share the costs of
environmental remediation with the landlord at the Anaheim
facility.  Under this agreement,
the Company is obligated to pay 80% of the site s total
remediation costs up to $725 (i.e., up
to the Company s share of $580) with any costs above $725 being
shared equally between the
company and the landlord.  To date the Company has paid $239 as
its share of the
remediation costs.  The Company has accrued $810 in the
accompanying balance sheet
associated with this environmental remediation, which represents
its estimated share of the
future discounted remediation costs.  

Other than the environmental litigation described above, the
Company is involved in
additional litigation matters resulting from the ordinary course
of business.  At the current
time, management believes that all such additional actions, in
the aggregate, will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company.


<PAGE>
                   DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                    (In thousands except share amounts)


Note 12 - BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOPRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Company operates in one primary industry segment providing
ECM and PCB fabrication
services principally to the computer, communications,
instrumentation, and medical equipment
markets. Sales, operating income, and identifiable assets by
geographic area are as follows: 
                                                            June 30,
                                                 1995        1994         1993

  Sales:
    United States                              $ 8,765     $27,571      $33,453
    Northern Ireland                            20,811     20,958       24,430
                                                ------     ------       ------
          Total                                $29,576     $48,529      $57,883
                                                ======     ======       ======

  Income/loss from operations:
    United States                              $(2,927)    $(5,979)     $(4,402)
    Northern Ireland                               561      (2,375)      (1,228)
                                                ------       ------       ------
          Total                                $(2,366)    $(8,354)     $(5,630)
                                                ======       ======       ======

  Identifiable assets:
    United States                              $ 1,003     $12,990      $14,601
    Northern Ireland                            11,587     10,268       19,138
                                                ------     ------       ------
          Total                                $12,590     $23,258      $33,739
                                                ======     ======       ======

Sales by A.J. Electronics to Dataproducts Corporation accounted
for approximately 13.0% and
13.3% of sales in 1994 and 1993, respectively.


<PAGE>

                    DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
              (In thousands except share and per share amounts)

Note 13 - QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

                                                 Quarters ended
                               
- -------------------------------------------------
                              September 30   December 31   March 31     June 30      Total

Fiscal 1995

Sales                             $ 8,940        $ 7,654      $6,079      $ 6,903    $ 29,576
                                   ======         ======      ======       ======     =======

Income (loss) from 
  continuing operations            (2,862)         2,145         167       (1,816)     (2,366)
Extraordinary item-gain on 
  debt extinguishment                  -           2,441          -            -        2,441
                                   ------         ------      ------       ------      ------
Net income (loss)                 $(2,862)       $ 4,586      $  167      $(1,816)    $    75
                                   ======         ======      ======       ======      ======

Income (loss) per share:
  Continuing operations            $(0.19)        $ 0.13       $0.01       $(0.11)     $(0.15)
  Extraordinary item                   -            0.15          -            -         0.15
                                    -----          -----       -----        -----       -----
        Total                      $(0.19)        $ 0.28       $0.01       $(0.11)       0.00
                                    ======         =====       =====        =====       =====

Fiscal 1994

Sales                             $14,249        $13,920     $11,343      $ 9,017     $48,529
                                   ======         ======     ======       ======      ======  

Net loss                          $(1,569)       $(2,324)    $(2,142)     $(2,319)    $(8,354)
                                   ======         ======     ======       ======      ======  

Loss per share
  Net loss                         $(0.11)        $(0.15)     $(0.14)      $(0.15)     $(0.55)
                                    =====          =====      =====        =====       =====  


<PAGE>

                       DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           Market and Dividend Information



The Company's common shares are traded on the New York Stock and
Pacific Stock
Exchanges (ticker symbol DDL).  The high and low closing sales
prices for the common
stock for the last two fiscal years, as reported in the New York
Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions, are set forth in the following table.

                                        Fiscal 1995           Fiscal 1994    
                                       High      Low         High      Low

1st Quarter                           1-7/8       1         2-5/8    1-5/8

2nd Quarter                           2-1/2       1         1-7/8       1

3rd Quarter                           1-1/2       1             2    1-1/8

4th Quarter                              2     1-1/8        1-3/8      3/4

There were approximately 1,567 stockholders of record at
September 15, 1995. 

The Company's warrants are traded on the Over the Counter (OTC)
Bulletin Board (ticker
symbol DDLBW).

The Company suspended dividend payments effective March 31, 1989. 
A resumption of
dividend payments is not anticipated in the foreseeable future.  


                           Form 10-K Annual Report

- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------

A copy of the Form 10-K annual report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(without exhibits) may be obtained free of charge upon written
request to DDL Electronics,
Inc., Tigard, Oregon  97223.







<PAGE>

              DDL ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

DIRECTORS, CORPORATE OFFICERS, OPERATING UNITS AND OTHER
INFORMATION

DIRECTORS
- ---------
Philip H. Alspach
President, Intercon, Inc.
Irvine, California            

Melvin Foster
Lawyer, Member of Massachusetts State Bar
Boston, Massachusetts  
Audit Committee

Don A. Raig
Interim President and 
Chief Operating Officer 
DDL Electronics, Inc.
Tigard, Oregon  

Bernee D. L. Strom
President and CEO, USA Digital Radio
Chicago, Illinois
Audit Committee

Erven Tallman
Acting Chairman of the Board 
and Chief Executive Officer, 
DDL Electronics, Inc.
Tigard, Oregon  
Compensation Committee

Rob Wilson
Interim Vice President, 
DDL Electronics, Inc.
Tigard, Oregon  
Compensation Committee

CORPORATE OFFICERS
- ------------------
Erven Tallman
Acting Chairman of the Board 
and Chief Executive Officer

Don A. Raig
Interim President and 
Chief Operating Officer 

Rob Wilson
Interim Vice President

C.L. Haslam
Secretary

OPERATING UNITS
- ---------------
DDL Electronics Limited
Craigavon, Northern Ireland

Irlandus Circuits Limited
Craigavon, Northern Ireland


TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
- ----------------------------
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & 
TRUST CO.
40 Wall Street
New York, New York  10005

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
- --------------------
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Portland, Oregon

LEGAL COUNSEL
- -------------
C. L. Haslam
4620 Sedgwick Street NW
Washington, DC 20016

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP
2500 Charlotte Plaza
Charlotte, North Carolina  28244

</TABLE>

EXHIBIT 21

                           DDL ELECTRONICS, INC.
                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


All subsidiaries are 100% owned by DDL Electronics, Inc., except
as otherwise
indicated, and are included in the consolidated financial
statements.


Subsidiaries                                                 
Incorporation

Aeroscientific Corp. (California) 
(99.9% owned by DDL Electronics, Inc.)                     
California

Aeroscientific Corp. (Oregon)
(100% owned by Aeroscientific Corp.(California))           
Oregon

A.J. Electronics, Inc.                                      
California

DDL Europe Limited                                          
Northern Ireland

DDL Electronics Limited 
(100% owned by DDL Europe Limited)                         
Northern Ireland

Irlandus Circuits Limited 
(100% owned by DDL Europe Limited)                         
Northern Ireland
                                                             




EXHIBIT 23a


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
DDL Electronics, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 33-18356, 33-45102 and 33-74400) on Form S-8 of
DDL Electronics, Inc. of our reports dated August 18, 1995 and
August 19, 1994, relating to the consolidated balances sheet of
DDL Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1995 and
1994, respectively, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows and related
schedules for the years then ended, which reports appears in the
June 30, 1995 and 1994 annual report of DDL Electronics, Inc.

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
in 1994 the Company adopted the provisions of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes".


KPMG PEAT MARWICK

Portland, Oregon
September 28, 1995

                                                               
EXHIBIT 23B

Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement
Schedules


To the Board of Directors of DDL Electronics, Inc.:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to
in our report dated August 20, 1993, appearing on Page 33 of the
1995 Annual Report to Stockholders of DDL Electronics, Inc. also
included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedules listed in
Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K as relating to the year ending
June 30, 1993.  In our opinion, these Financial Statement
Schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements.

Price Waterhouse LLP

Portland, Oregon 

August 20, 1993
               

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995            
JUN-30-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995            
JUN-30-1994
<CASH>                                           2,917            
      2,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0            
          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,600            
      5,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                       181            
        533
<INVENTORY>                                      2,188            
      3,647
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,876            
     12,018
<PP&E>                                          15,971            
     33,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,662            
     23,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,590            
     23,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,904            
     21,277
<BONDS>                                          2,233            
      2,393
<COMMON>                                           161            
        145
                                0            
          0
                                          0            
          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,505)            
    (5,034)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,590            
     23,258
<SALES>                                         29,576            
     48,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,576            
     48,529
<CGS>                                           26,516            
     47,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,059            
     55,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0            
          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0            
          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 883            
      1,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,366)            
    (8,354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0            
          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,366)            
    (8,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0            
          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,441            
          0
<CHANGES>                                            0            
          0
<NET-INCOME>                                        75            
    (8,354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0            
     (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0            
     (0.55)
        

</TABLE>

                                                  EXHIBIT 99

              UNDERTAKING FOR FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT



With respect to the Registration Statement previously filed by
the Company on Form S-8, the Company hereby undertakes as
follows:

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers
and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in
the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable.  In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the Company in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding), is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Company will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the
question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission