=============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
-----
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [x]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[x] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or
Section 240.14a-12
------------------------------------------------
FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
------------------------------------------------
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[x] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(i)(2).
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
=============================================================================
<PAGE>
Fairfield Communities, Inc.
2800 Cantrell Road
Little Rock, Arkansas 72202
----------------------------------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
----------------------------------------
Dear Stockholder:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Fairfield Communities, Inc. (the
"Company") will be held on Thursday, May 9, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. Central
Daylight Savings Time at The Capital Hotel, 111 West Markham Street, Little
Rock, Arkansas, for the following purposes:
1. To elect eight members of the Board of Directors; and
2. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
The Board of Directors has nominated certain individuals for election to
serve as directors. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote for
these nominees.
The close of business on March 25, 1996 has been fixed as the record
date for the meeting. All stockholders of record at that time are entitled
to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements
thereof.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting. The Board
of Directors urges you to date, sign and return promptly the enclosed proxy
to give voting instructions with respect to your shares of Common Stock. The
proxies are solicited by the Company's Board of Directors. The return of the
proxy will not affect your right to vote in person if you attend the meeting.
A copy of the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended
December 31, 1995 is also enclosed.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Marcel J. Dumeny
Marcel J. Dumeny
Secretary
April 1, 1996
TO ASSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE
COMPLETE THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE
ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE PREPAID ENVELOPE.
<PAGE>
Fairfield Communities, Inc.
2800 Cantrell Road
Little Rock, Arkansas 72202
(501) 664-6000
Proxy Statement
for
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held May 9, 1996
INTRODUCTION
General
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the board of directors (the "Board" or the "Board of Directors")
of Fairfield Communities, Inc. (the "Company") for use at the 1996 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"), to be held on Thursday, May
9, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Savings Time at The Capital Hotel, 111
West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, and any adjournments or
postponements thereof. At the Annual Meeting, the holders (sometimes
referred to herein as "stockholders") of common stock, $0.01 par value per
share, of the Company (the "Common Stock"), will be asked to elect as
directors the individuals nominated by the Board (collectively, the
"Nominees" and each individually a "Nominee") and to approve, consent to,
ratify or otherwise transact such other business as may properly come before
the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Board
knows of no other business that will be presented for stockholder action at
the Annual Meeting.
The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is
P.O. Box 3375, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203. This Proxy Statement is first
being mailed to stockholders of the Company on or about April 1, 1996.
Record Date, Solicitation and Revocability of Proxies
The Board has selected March 25, 1996 as the record date (the "Record
Date") for the Annual Meeting. Only those stockholders of record as of the
close of business on the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at
the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were
9,946,553 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. Stockholders will
be entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held by them of record
at the close of business on the Record Date on any matters properly brought
before the Annual Meeting for a vote. A list of the stockholders of the
Company will be available at the Company's principal executive offices in
Little Rock, Arkansas for at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting for
examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting.
Proxies in the form enclosed are solicited by the Board. Shares of
Common Stock represented by a properly executed proxy, if such proxy is
received in time and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in
accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxy. IF NO INSTRUCTIONS
ARE INDICATED, SHARES OF COMPANY COMMON STOCK WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION
OF THE NOMINEES AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDER AS TO ANY OTHER
MATTER WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING FOR A VOTE. IF
NECESSARY, AND UNLESS CONTRARY INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN, THE PROXY HOLDER MAY
ALSO VOTE IN FAVOR OF A PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN THE MEETING IN ORDER TO PERMIT
FURTHER SOLICITATION OF PROXIES, TO OBTAIN A QUORUM OR TO OBTAIN SUFFICIENT
VOTES TO APPROVE THE PROPOSALS.
A stockholder who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to
its exercise at the Annual Meeting by any one of the following actions: (i)
giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company, (ii)
properly submitting to the Company a duly executed proxy bearing a later date
than the proxy being revoked or (iii) appearing in person at the Annual
Meeting and voting in person. All written notices of revocation or other
communications with respect to revocation of proxies should be addressed as
follows: Fairfield Communities, Inc., P.O. Box 3375, Little Rock, Arkansas
72203, Attention: Marcel J. Dumeny, Secretary.
The Company will bear the expense of preparing and mailing the proxy
materials and may use regular employees and associates, without additional
compensation, to request, by telephone or otherwise, the return of proxies or
attendance at the Annual Meeting. Arrangements will also be made with
brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward
solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares of Common Stock,
and the Company will reimburse such brokerage firms and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
them in connection with the forwarding of such materials. The Company has
retained Morrow & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies. The fee
to be paid by the Company to such firm is estimated to be $3,000, plus
reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs and expenses.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the number of
shares deemed present or represented at the Annual Meeting, or any
adjournments or postponements thereof, for purposes of determining whether a
quorum exists. Abstentions and broker non-votes with regard to matters
brought before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments or postponements
thereof, will be treated as shares not voted for purposes of determining
whether the requisite vote has been obtained. With regard to the election of
directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from each Nominee.
Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have
no effect.
Votes Required
Provided a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the
shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote
is required for election of each of the Nominees. Stockholders may not
cumulate their votes.
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
General
The Board is comprised of one class of directors, elected annually.
Each director serves a one-year term (and, in each case, until his or her
respective successor is duly elected and qualified). The Nominees have been
nominated for the eight director positions. The number of directors,
currently set at eight, is fixed from time to time by or in the manner
provided in the Company's Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (the "Bylaws").
Information regarding the Nominees is set forth below. Each of the
Nominees, except for Bryan D. Langton and Charles D. Morgan, Jr., is
currently serving as a director of the Company. Mr. Ronald Langley began
serving as a director in May 1995. Messrs. Russell A. Belinsky, Ernest D.
Bennett, III, Philip L. Herrington and William C. Scott began serving as
directors in September 1992. Mr. John W. McConnell has been a director of
the Company since March 1990. Mr. Daryl J. Butcher, whose current term as a
director expires at the time of the Annual Meeting, is not standing for
reelection as a director.
A plurality of the votes of the Common Stock cast at the Annual Meeting
(or any adjournments or postponements thereof) is required to elect
directors. Each Nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement
and to serve if elected. If a Nominee should for any reason become
unavailable for election, proxies may be voted with discretionary authority
by the proxy holder for a substitute designated by the Board.
The Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of the
Nominees. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless
stockholders specify in their proxies a contrary choice.
Nominees for Election as Directors
Russell A. Belinsky, age 35, Managing Director, Chanin and Company, an
investment banking company, since December 1994. From 1990 to December 1994,
Mr. Belinsky was Senior Vice President and Principal of Chanin and Company
and Senior Vice President and Principal of GTC Capital Partners. Director,
Furr's/Bishop's, Inc., a restaurant company, since February 1996. From 1986
to 1990, Mr. Belinsky was an associate at the law firm of Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom.
Ernest D. Bennett, III, age 43, partner at the law firm of Taylor,
Philbin, Pigue, Marchetti and Bennett since June 1992. From 1989 to May
1992, Mr. Bennett served as General Counsel at Robert Orr/Sysco Food Services
Company. From 1980 to 1989, Mr. Bennett was a partner at the law firm of
Camp and Bennett.
Philip L. Herrington, age 43, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Herrington, Inc., a private investment and business advisory firm involved in
resort and real estate development and management, since 1986. President and
Chief Operating Officer of Destin Guardian Corporation, a real estate
development company, since 1989.
Ronald Langley, age 51, Chairman of Quaker Holdings Limited, an
investment banking firm, since October 1992. Chairman, since 1995, and
Director, since 1993, of Physicians Insurance Company of Ohio, an insurance
company. Director of Summit Global Management, Inc., a subsidiary of
Physicians Insurance Company of Ohio which acts as a registered investment
company, since 1995. Director, PC Quote, Inc., an information retrieval
company, since 1995.
Bryan D. Langton, age 59, Chairman of Holiday Inns, Inc., an owner,
franchiser and manager of hotels, since February 1990. President and Chief
Executive Officer of Holiday Inns, Inc. from February 1990 to March 1996.
Director, Bass PLC, a hospitality, food, drink and electronic entertainment
company, and parent company of Holiday Inns, Inc., since 1985. Director,
Wachovia Bank of Georgia NA. Director, National Service Industries Inc., a
textile rental, chemical, lighting equipment, insulation and envelope product
and services company, since 1993.
John W. McConnell, age 54, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company since 1991; President and Chief Operating Officer from 1990 to 1991;
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1986 to 1990.
Charles D. Morgan, Jr., age 53, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Acxiom Corporation, a data processing, facilities management and
software provider to the direct marketing, mail order, catalogue sales and
publishing industries and to marketing firms engaged in prospect generation.
Mr. Morgan joined Acxiom Corporation in 1972 as Vice President, becoming
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1975 and President in 1991.
Director, Boatmen's National Bank of Conway.
William C. Scott, age 59, President and Director of Summit Care
Corporation, a developer and operator of retirement and convalescent centers,
since 1985.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMMITTEES AND COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD
Board Committees
During 1995, there were eight meetings of the Board. With the exception
of Mr. Langley, all of the directors attended at least 75 percent of the
aggregate number of meetings of the Board and all committees on which they
served. Mr. Langley attended four of the five Board meetings following his
May 1995 election as a director and did not attend the one meeting of a
committee on which he served following his election.
The Board currently has three standing committees. Certain information
regarding the function of these standing committees, their membership and
number of meetings held during 1995 follows.
The Audit Committee, which met three times during 1995, recommends to
the Board a firm to serve as the independent public accountants for the
Company and monitors the performance of such firm; reviews and approves the
scope of the annual audit and quarterly reviews and evaluates with the
independent public accountants the Company's annual audit and annual
consolidated financial statements; reviews with management the status of
internal accounting controls; and evaluates public financial reporting
documents of the Company. From January 1, 1995 to November 17, 1995, the
members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Ernest D. Bennett, III
(Chairman), Daryl J. Butcher and Ronald Langley. From November 17, 1995 to
the present, the members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Ernest D.
Bennett, III (Chairman), Daryl J. Butcher and William C. Scott.
The Compensation Committee, which met two times during 1995, reviews the
administration of the Company's employee benefit plans and takes certain
actions (including, where appropriate, the making of recommendations to the
Board) with respect to the Company's compensation policies. From January 1,
1995 to November 17, 1995, the members of the Compensation Committee were
Messrs. Russell A. Belinsky (Chairman), William C. Scott and Philip L.
Herrington. From November 17, 1995 to the present, the members of the
Compensation Committee are Messrs. Russell A. Belinsky (Chairman), Philip L.
Herrington and Ronald Langley.
During 1995, the Board established a Nominating Committee to review and
recommend to the Board proposed nominees for directors of the Company. The
members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Philip L. Herrington
(Chairman), Russell A. Belinsky and John W. McConnell. The Nominating
Committee, which met two times during 1995, considers stockholder
recommendations which are submitted in writing and addressed to the attention
of the Secretary of the Company. Any recommendation should include the name
and address of the stockholder making the recommendation and the number of
shares owned by said stockholder, the candidate's name and address, a summary
of the candidate's educational background and business or professional
experience during the past five years, the names of any corporations of which
the candidate is or has been a director and any other information the
proposing stockholder considers relevant in evaluating the candidate's
qualifications. The recommendation also should indicate the candidate's
willingness to serve if nominated and selected.
Directors' Compensation
The Company has a policy of compensating only outside directors for
attendance at meetings of the Board and meetings of Board committees. During
1995, outside directors received $1,000 for each in-person Board and Board
committee meeting and $750 for each telephonic Board or Board committee
meeting in which they participated, plus a $1,750 monthly retainer.
Compensation payments to directors totaled $176,935 for 1995. The Company
also reimburses directors for travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with attendance at meetings.
The Company's First Amended and Restated 1992 Warrant Plan (the "1992
Warrant Plan") provides for the grant of non-qualified stock warrants to
certain key employees and directors to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of
Common Stock. Warrants under the 1992 Warrant Plan are to be granted at
prices not less than the fair market value of such shares on the date of
grant and may be exercisable for periods of up to 10 years from the date of
grant. During 1995, warrants were granted to outside directors to purchase a
total of 3,000 shares each of Common Stock. These warrants were granted
effective November 17, 1995 at an exercise price of $7.125 per share, and
become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer (the "CEO") and each of the other four most highly compensated
executive officers (collectively, the "named executive officers") for each of
the last three years:
Long Term
Annual Compensation Compensation
------------------- ------------
Securities
Underlying All Other
Name and Warrants/ Compen-
Principal SARS sation
Position Year Salary Bonus (#) (4)
-------- ---- ------ ----- ------- -------
John W. McConnell 1995 $275,000 $261,565 - $114,377
President and 1994 275,000 275,000 - 109,993
Chief Executive 1993 275,000 185,625 - 68,054
Officer
Clayton G. Gring, Sr. 1995 198,077 164,073 - 82,990
Senior Vice 1994 150,000 183,750 - 55,381
President and 1993 150,000 37,500 100,000 35,877
Chief Operating
Officer (1)
Marcel J. Dumeny 1995 175,000 85,277 - 38,691
Senior Vice 1994 175,000 87,500 - 62,915
President, General 1993 175,000 67,411 - 41,071
Counsel and
Secretary
Robert W. Howeth 1995 175,000 85,865 - 51,477
Senior Vice 1994 173,823 88,429 - 61,409
President, Chief 1993 164,800 49,440 100,000 33,795
Financial Officer
and Treasurer (2)
Morris E. Meacham 1995 120,000 84,562 - 42,538
Vice President (3) 1994 121,539 157,692 - 78,980
1993 200,000 72,051 - 43,589
- --------------------
(1) On January 23, 1996, Mr. Gring was elected Chief Operating Officer.
(2) During 1994, Mr. Howeth was elected Chief Financial Officer.
(3) Prior to January 1, 1994, Mr. Meacham served as Executive Vice
President.
(4) Compensation in 1995 includes (a) contributions to the Company's
Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (Mr. McConnell - $5,220; Mr. Gring - $5,220;
Mr. Dumeny - $5,220; Mr. Howeth - $5,220 and Mr. Meacham - $5,220), (b)
allocated benefits under the Company's Excess Benefit Plan (Mr.
McConnell - $11,879; Mr. Gring - $6,523; Mr. Dumeny - $1,196; Mr. Howeth
- $3,089 and Mr. Meacham - $1,535), (c) dollar amounts of premiums paid
on life insurance policies for the benefit of the named executives
officers' respective designated beneficiaries (Mr. McConnell - $5,724;
Mr. Gring - $10,155; Mr. Dumeny - $1,475; Mr. Howeth - $1,600 and Mr.
Meacham - $3,053) and (d) allocated benefits under the Company's Key
Employee Retirement Plan (Mr. McConnell - $91,554; Mr. Gring - $61,092;
Mr. Dumeny - $30,800; Mr. Howeth - $41,568 and Mr. Meacham - $32,730).
Compensation in 1994 includes (a) contributions to the Company's
Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (Mr. McConnell - $7,849; Mr. Gring - $6,724;
Mr. Dumeny - $7,568; Mr. Howeth - $7,553 and Mr. Meacham - $7,849), (b)
allocated benefits under the Company's Excess Benefit Plan (Mr.
McConnell - $14,252; Mr. Gring - $2,036; Mr. Dumeny - $5,158; Mr. Howeth
- $4,752 and Mr. Meacham - $8,214), (c) dollar amounts of premiums paid
on life insurance policies for the benefit of the named executives
officers' respective designated beneficiaries (Mr. McConnell - $5,392;
Mr. Gring - $9,121; Mr. Dumeny - $1,189; Mr. Howeth - $1,598 and Mr.
Meacham - $2,661) and (d) allocated benefits under the Company's Key
Employee Retirement Plan (Mr. McConnell - $82,500; Mr. Gring - $37,500;
Mr. Dumeny - $49,000; Mr. Howeth - $47,506 and Mr. Meacham - $60,256).
Compensation in 1993 includes (a) contributions to the Company's
Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (Mr. McConnell - $10,513; Mr. Gring -
$6,307; Mr. Dumeny - $10,513; Mr. Howeth - $8,579 and Mr. Meacham -
$10,513), (b) allocated benefits under the Company's Excess Benefit Plan
(Mr. McConnell - $7,225; Mr. Dumeny - $334 and Mr. Meacham - $719), (c)
dollar amounts of premiums paid on life insurance policies for the
benefit of the named executives officers' respective designated
beneficiaries (Mr. McConnell - $4,941; Mr. Gring - $11,209; Mr. Dumeny -
$1,135; Mr. Howeth - $1,485 and Mr. Meacham - $2,357) and (d) allocated
benefits under the Company's Key Employee Retirement Plan (Mr. McConnell
- $45,375; Mr. Gring - $18,361; Mr. Dumeny - $29,089; Mr. Howeth -
$23,731 and Mr. Meacham - $30,000).
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Savings/Profit Sharing Plan
The Company's Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (the "Savings/Profit Sharing
Plan") covers substantially all employees with one year or more of credited
service. This plan includes a profit sharing feature, with annual employer
discretionary contributions, and a 401(k) feature, which allows employee
elective salary deferrals, with the Company currently matching a portion of
such deferrals. Participants are fully vested in their profit sharing and
matching accounts after seven years of credited service. The Company's
contribution to the Savings/Profit Sharing Plan totaled $0.6 million for
1995.
Excess Benefit Plan
The Excess Benefit Plan (the "Excess Benefit Plan") is a non-qualified,
unfunded plan established to provide designated employees with benefits to
compensate for certain limitations imposed by federal law on the amount of
compensation which may be considered in determining employer contributions to
participants' accounts under the profit sharing feature of the Savings/Profit
Sharing Plan. Participants' accounts under the Excess Benefit Plan are
credited with amounts that, except for the limits of the Internal Revenue
Code, would have been contributed to such participants' accounts under the
profit sharing feature of the Savings/Profit Sharing Plan. Participants'
accounts under the Excess Benefit Plan vest in accordance with the vesting
schedule for profit sharing accounts under the Savings/Profit Sharing Plan.
Interest is credited to the participants' accounts annually at the base
(prime) rate of interest charged by The First National Bank of Boston.
Participants' accounts under the Excess Benefit Plan were credited by a total
of $0.1 million for 1995.
Key Employee Retirement Plan
The Key Employee Retirement Plan (the "Key Employee Retirement Plan") is
a non-qualified, unfunded plan established to provide certain senior
executives of the Company with retirement benefits. Under the Key Employee
Retirement Plan, participants' accounts are credited on each January 1 by a
percentage of each participant's preceding year's total cash compensation.
In general, the benefit percentage can range from 0% to 20%, depending on the
Company's three-year moving average rate of return on stockholders' equity.
Participants' accounts are fully vested after seven years of service or upon
the occurrence of a change in control of the Company, death of the
participant, termination of employment due to total disability or retirement
on or after the age 55, in each case while employed by the Company. Interest
is credited to participants' accounts monthly at the base (prime) rate of
interest charged by The First National Bank of Boston, as in effect on the
first banking day of each year. Participants' accounts were credited by a
total of $0.3 million for 1995.
Stock Warrants
The Company's 1992 Warrant Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified
stock warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Under the
1992 Warrant Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
("Compensation Committee") may grant to "key" employees warrants to purchase
shares of Common Stock at prices not less than the fair market value of such
shares on the date of grant. "Key" employees are determined by the
Compensation Committee, and may include executive officers, and other
officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. Warrants may be
exercisable for periods up to 10 years from the date of grant. There were no
stock warrants granted to any named executive officer during 1995.
Warrant Exercises In Last Year And Year-End Warrant Values
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number
of unexercised warrants at December 31, 1995. There were no warrants
exercised by any named executive officer during 1995.
Value of Unexercised
Number of Securities in-the-Money
Underlying Unexercised Warrants Warrants
at Year End at Year End(1)
----------- --------------
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
John W. McConnell 150,000 - $618,750 $ -
Clayton G. Gring, Sr. 40,000 60,000 165,000 247,500
Marcel J. Dumeny 100,000 - 412,500 -
Robert W. Howeth 40,000 60,000 165,000 247,500
Morris E. Meacham 100,000 - 412,500 -
- --------------------
(1) The dollar amounts shown represent the amount by which the product of
the number of shares purchasable upon the exercise of the related
warrants and the December 31, 1995 closing market price of $7.125 per
share exceeds the aggregate purchase price payable upon such exercise.
Employment Arrangements and Termination of Employment Arrangements
The Company entered into employment agreements (the "Employment
Agreements"), effective September 1, 1992, with Messrs. John W. McConnell and
Marcel J. Dumeny (the "Executives"). The Employment Agreements are for
initial terms of three years, with automatic one-year extensions, unless at
least nine months' termination notice is given by either the Company or the
Executives prior to the expiration of the initial or any renewal term, and
provide for (a) initial annual base salaries to Messrs. McConnell and Dumeny
of $275,000 and $175,000, respectively, (b) Company paid term life insurance
coverage equal to two times their respective base salaries, (c) the grant to
Messrs. McConnell and Dumeny of warrants, exercisable through August 31,
2002, to purchase 150,000 and 100,000 shares, respectively, of Common Stock,
at an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share, with 25% of such warrants
vesting (and becoming non-cancelable, regardless of whether or not the
Executive thereafter remains employed by the Company) on each of September 1,
1992, August 31, 1993, August 31, 1994 and August 31, 1995, and (d) incentive
compensation programs at the discretion of the Board of Directors. If,
during the term of the Employment Agreements, an Executive is terminated (i)
for any reason, other than "for cause" (as defined in the Employment
Agreements), death or disability, or (ii) at the Executive's option due to
"Constructive Discharge" (as defined in the Employment Agreements), then such
Executive shall receive termination pay, subject to the limitations of
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, equal to 150% of his highest
annualized salary prior to termination. No termination pay is due to any
Executive who voluntarily resigns, is terminated "for cause" or ceases to be
employed as a result of death or disability.
Effective January 1, 1994, Mr. Meacham entered into an employment
contract (the "Employment Contract") as Vice President of Special Projects.
The Employment Contract is for a three-year term, with automatic one-year
extensions, unless at least nine months' termination notice is given by
either the Company or Mr. Meacham prior to the expiration of the initial or
any renewal term, and provides for an annual base salary of $120,000. The
Employment Contract also provides for payment of annual incentive bonuses
upon such terms as the Board may deem appropriate. If, during the term of
the Employment Contract, Mr. Meacham is terminated (a) for any reason, other
than "for cause" (as defined in his Employment Contract), death or
disability, or (b) at his option due to "Constructive Discharge" (as defined
in his Employment Contract), then Mr. Meacham is entitled to termination pay,
subject to the limitations of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code,
equal to (i) $180,000, if his termination date occurs at any time during the
period from December 31, 1995 through December 30, 1996, and (ii) $120,000,
if his termination date occurs at any time from and after December 31, 1996.
No termination pay is due to Mr. Meacham if he voluntarily resigns, is
terminated "for cause" or ceases to be employed as a result of death or
disability, except that Mr. Meacham may elect to terminate his employment
effective December 31, 1996 and receive $120,000, to partially compensate him
for his willingness to terminate his prior employment agreement, which
provided for significantly higher base salary and termination pay, and enter
into the Employment Contract. Mr. Meacham is also entitled to Company paid
term life insurance coverage in the amount of $400,000. On March 12, 1996,
Mr. Meacham, with the Company's consent, took an unpaid personal leave of
absence, which may extend through all or part of the remainder of 1996.
During 1993, the Company entered into Severance Pay Agreements (the
"Severance Pay Agreements") with Messrs. Gring and Howeth. The Severance Pay
Agreements extend through August 31, 1995, with automatic one-year
extensions, unless at least nine months' termination notice is given by
either the Company or Messrs. Gring or Howeth prior to the expiration of the
initial or any renewal term. If, during the term of the Severance Pay
Agreements, Messrs. Gring or Howeth is terminated (i) for any reason, other
than "for cause" (as defined in the Severance Pay Agreements), death or
disability, or (ii) at Messrs. Gring's or Howeth's option, due to
"Constructive Discharge" (as defined in the Severance Pay Agreements), then
Messrs. Gring or Howeth shall receive termination pay, subject to the
limitations of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, equal to 150% of
their highest annualized base salary prior to termination. No termination
pay is due to Messrs. Gring or Howeth if they voluntarily resign, are
terminated "for cause" or cease to be employed as a result of death or
disability. Messrs. Gring and Howeth have also been separately granted
Company paid term life insurance coverage in amounts equal to two times their
respective base salaries.
On September 1, 1992, the Company granted Mr. Meacham a warrant,
exercisable through August 31, 2002, to purchase 100,000 shares of Common
Stock, at an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share. The warrant is fully
vested and non-cancelable, regardless of whether or not Mr. Meacham remains
employed by the Company. On September 29, 1993, the Company granted Messrs.
Gring and Howeth warrants, with a term of 10 years from the date of grant
(subject to earlier termination if Messrs. Gring or Howeth ceases to be
employed by the Company), to purchase 100,000 shares each of Common Stock at
an exercise price equal to $3.00 per share, with 20% of such warrants vesting
on each of the first through fifth anniversaries following the date of grant.
Also during 1993, the Company granted two other executive officers warrants,
with a term of 10 years from the date of grant (subject to earlier
termination if either employee ceases to be employed by the Company), to
purchase, in the aggregate, 40,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price equal to $3.00 per share, with 20% of such warrants vesting on each of
the first through fifth anniversaries following the date of grant.
Report on Executive Compensation
The following Report on Executive Compensation (the "Report") and the
performance graphs in the next section shall not be deemed to be "soliciting
material" or to be "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC") or subject to Regulations 14A or 14C of the SEC or to the liabilities
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and
shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, notwithstanding any general
incorporation by reference of this Proxy Statement into any other document.
INTRODUCTION
The Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the
"Committee") reviews, considers for approval and administers the granting of
benefits under all compensation programs for officers of the Company holding
the position of Vice President or above (the "Officers"). More specifically,
on an annual or more frequent basis, the Committee reviews and considers for
approval recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") for salary,
incentive compensation and stock warrant grants to the other Officers of the
Company and recommends to the Board of Directors the salary, incentive
compensation and stock warrant grants to the CEO. The actions taken by the
Committee are reported to the Board of Directors, which exercises final
approval authority over compensation decisions.
From January 1, 1995 to November 17, 1995, the members of the Committee
were Russell A. Belinsky, Chairman of the Committee, Philip L. Herrington and
William C. Scott. From November 17, 1995 through December 31, 1995, the
members of the Committee were Russell A. Belinsky, Chairman of the Committee,
Philip L. Herrington and Ronald Langley. No member of the Committee is a
current or former employee or officer of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. Except as otherwise stated, the Report discusses the
Committee's compensation policies applicable to the officers of the Company
at the executive level (the "Executive Officers"), including the relationship
between the Company's performance and executive compensation, and describes
the specific bases on which the Committee made compensation decisions in 1995
with regard to the CEO.
During 1993, the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") was amended, adding
Section 162(m), which, in general, limits the deductibility of annual
compensation paid after January 1, 1994 to the CEO and four other most highly
compensated executive officers to $1,000,000, subject to certain exceptions.
The Internal Revenue Service in December 1995, published final regulations
implementing this limitation. The limitation is not currently expected to
result in the loss of any tax deductions for the Company's cash compensation
programs, but may result in a limitation on the amount of tax deduction taken
in connection with certain awards under the Company's stock warrant plan,
since the ultimate value of the stock warrants is open-ended, depending upon
the market price for the Company's common stock at the time the warrants are
exercised, as compared to the exercise price. Warrants granted to three of
the named Executive Officers of the Corporation, including the CEO, for a
total of 350,000 shares of the Company's common stock, pre-date the February
17, 1993 transition date established for application of Section 162(m) of the
Code and, based upon the Company's review of the final regulations
implementing Section 162(m), are not believed to be subject to the $1,000,000
limit on tax deductibility. Payments under the Excess Benefit and Key
Employee Retirement Plans count towards the Section 162(m) limitation and
accordingly may, when aggregated with other compensation subject to the
Section 162(m) limitation, such as income from the exercise of certain of the
stock warrants, result in a limitation on the deductibility of benefits paid
under such plans. The Company has no current plans to amend the stock
warrant plan, Excess Benefit Plan or Key Employee Retirement Plan, or to take
other actions, to comply with the exemptions from the limitation, but intends
to monitor the Company's tax situation, the Company's compensation practices
and developments in this area of the tax law in future years, to determine
whether its executive compensation plans should be amended, or other action
taken, to meet the deductibility requirements of the tax law.
POLICY AND OVERALL COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES
The Committee's general policy is to provide Officers of the Company
with competitive compensation opportunities, which are internally equitable,
including short and long term incentive awards based upon meeting or
exceeding business and/or individual performance goals. These performance
goals are annually reflected as specific targets designed primarily to
reflect measures of profitability and shareholder return (e.g., stock price)
and, secondarily, management priorities, which change over time. The actual
target levels and relative weights of each measure are subjectively
determined by the Committee, on an annual basis.
COMPARABLE COMPENSATION INFORMATION
During 1995, the Committee retained William M. Mercer, Incorporated
("Mercer"), a national consulting firm experienced in executive compensation
matters, to review the compensation programs of the Company applicable to the
named Executive Officers. The Committee believed that it was desirable to
update the work done by Mercer in 1994, particularly since the Company
operates in a line of business for which comparable compensation information
is not readily available. Mercer's 1995 study of the Company's compensation
programs for the named Executive Officers (the "Study") included base salary,
total cash compensation (salary plus short term incentives), short term
incentive compensation practices, long term incentive/capital accumulation
practices and retirement benefits. In developing market comparables, because
of a lack of data from other publicly traded companies whose primary focus is
the vacation ownership business, the Study relied upon a composite of a
number of published surveys of executive compensation, for public and private
companies of similar size, which Mercer independently compiled in the normal
course of its business. All survey data were updated to a July 1, 1995
comparison date.
The Study found that the named Executive Officers' base salaries (after
giving effect to the increase, discussed below, in Mr. Gring's base salary)
ranged from 84% to 107% of the market average for similar positions, with the
average of the five named Executive Officers' base salaries being 94% of the
market average for similar positions. Based upon the Company's growth during
the latter half of 1995, projected growth during 1996 and Mercer's forecast
of executive salary increases in 1996, Mercer determined that the average
base salaries of the named Executive Officers will be 10% to 12% below
marketplace salaries for companies of comparable size. The Study also
compared total cash compensation (salary plus short term cash incentives)
earned for 1994 (adjusted to reflect Mr. Gring's 1995 increase in base
salary) to survey data, and determined that the named Executive Officers'
total compensation was at approximately the 75th percentile of the comparison
group. Mercer found the Company's compensation programs for the named
Executive Officers to be more heavily weighted towards "at risk" short term
incentive compensation than base salary, as compared to other companies in
the survey group. The Study said that this was consistent with the Company's
desire to maintain a strong link between financial performance and executive
pay. In analyzing short term incentive practices, Mercer determined that the
overall cash compensation levels were reflective of the growth the Company
experienced in revenues, earnings, stockholders' equity and stock price.
The Study examined survey companies' practices concerning the issuance
of long-term incentive awards to their five key executives and concluded
that, assuming a stock price of $7.00 per share, the Committee should
consider annual warrant grants to purchase approximately 122,000 shares of
common stock for the named Executive Officers, as a group. In view of the
limited amount of stock remaining available for grant under the Company's
warrant plan, Mercer suggested that consideration be given either to
replenishing the plan with shares in the near future or to exploring cash
based long term incentive programs, as an alternative, in order to prevent
shareholder dilution.
The Study reviewed the Company's retirement plan for the named Executive
Officers. Mercer found that the basic concept underlying the Key Employee
Retirement Plan, which is to replace approximately 40% of the average of the
last three years' cash compensation (salary plus short term incentive
compensation) for an executive with 20 years of service, is consistent with
how other companies provide for executive retirement. Mercer noted that the
Key Employee Retirement Plan differs from most other companies' plans by
incorporating a performance requirement, measured by return on stockholders'
equity, which only provides for an accrual of 4% of cash compensation if a
minimum 5% to 8% moving average rate of return on stockholders' equity is
met, with a maximum accrual of 20% of cash compensation for achieving an 18%
or greater moving average rate of return on stockholders' equity over the
three year measurement period. Mercer observed that achieving the highest
rate of stockholders' return every year for a number of years could result in
a retirement benefit above market levels, but that this would be a result of
the performance feature, which Mercer found to be a strength, consistent with
the Company's overall performance based compensation philosophy. Mercer also
noted that all of the participants in the Key Employee Retirement Plan served
with the Company as executive officers prior to the implementation of the
plan, and in some cases without many years remaining until retirement, and
that if the Company achieves above average performance, the higher percentage
accruals will permit these employees to realize retirement benefits more
consistent with their longer terms of service, prior to adoption of this
plan.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM COMPONENTS
The four components of the Company's compensation programs for Executive
Officers are (i) base salary, (ii) short term cash incentive compensation
award (bonus) plans, (iii) long term incentive award programs (stock
warrants) and (iv) benefits, each of which is discussed in detail below.
Base Salary. Except for an increase in Mr. Gring's base salary to
$200,000 per year, which Mercer determined in its Study to be 92% of the
market salary level, the Committee determined not to grant salary increases
during 1995 to the other Executive Officers. This decision reflects the
Committee's preference to emphasize performance based incentive compensation
over base salary.
Short Term Cash Incentive Compensation. The short term cash incentive
compensation plans applicable to the Executive Officers for 1995 were
designed to provide the potential for the participants to earn performance
based maximum awards ranging, on an individual basis, from approximately 15%
to 120% of base salary, depending on job function and scope of
responsibility. All but one of the Executive Officers' incentive
compensation plans were tied in whole or in substantial part to the level of
the Company's pre-tax earnings for 1995, as compared to budget. 1995
performance resulted in awards just below the maximum established levels for
this incentive target. Other significant performance goals for 1995 included
(a) increasing the trading price of the Company's common stock, which was
partially achieved, (b) acquiring properties for new or replacement inventory
for vacation ownership sites having at least $10 million in annual sales
potential, with a qualifying property acquisition occurring during 1995 in
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, (c) selling certain non-core assets, for which
two named Executive Officers received awards totaling $62,159, based upon
achieving in excess of $12 million of qualifying net asset sales proceeds,
(d) developing, and obtaining Board approval for, a plan for a new vacation
club product, which was achieved, (e) acquiring property management contracts
meeting certain qualifications, which was not achieved, and (f) establishing
a financing vehicle for the Company's contract receivables on more attractive
terms than existing alternatives, which was not achieved. Short term cash
incentive compensation for 1995 for the five named Executive Officers
decreased by approximately 14% from 1994.
Long Term Incentive Awards. The Committee believes that stock warrant
grants are desirable to align the interests of the Executive Officers and the
stockholders. In determining whether to grant stock warrants, the Committee
reviews the relationship of vested and unvested long-term compensation awards
to cash compensation, the desirability of providing additional incentives to
increase shareholder value and the potential for individual contribution to
affect the Company's performance. In light of the Committee's subjective
evaluation of these factors, during 1995, the Committee elected not to
recommend any additional awards of stock warrants to Executive Officers,
primarily due to the amount of stock warrants previously granted to the
Executive Officers, all of which remained outstanding unexercised at year-
end.
Benefits. The Company's benefit programs include optional life, health,
dental and disability coverages and participation in a tax qualified
Savings/Profit Sharing Plan, all of which are generally available to
qualifying employees of the Company. In addition, as disclosed under the
heading "Compensation of Executive Officers - Employment Arrangements and
Termination of Employment Arrangements", the named Executive Officers have
been granted additional Company paid term life insurance and are entitled to
certain severance benefits, in the event that their employment is terminated
by the Company, other than "for cause" or by reason of death or disability.
The Company's contributions to the Savings/Profit Sharing Plan totaled
$625,987 for 1995, which amount was calculated as being 5% of the pre-
contribution, pre-tax profit of the Company for 1995, net of the amounts
allocated to the Excess Benefit Plan, discussed below. This percentage was
unchanged from the previous two years. The Company in 1994 adopted a non-
qualified, unfunded Excess Benefit Plan, due to limitations on the amount of
compensation which can be considered, under the Code, for highly compensated
participants in determining contribution allocations to individual profit
sharing plan accounts. Accounts were established under the Excess Benefit
Plan for all employees of the Company who were affected by such limitations.
A total of $61,013 was allocated for 1995 under the Excess Benefit Plan to
twenty-two participants' accounts, to reflect the additional contributions
which would have been allocated to such participants' accounts under the
profit sharing plan in the absence of the Code limitation, of which $24,221
was allocated to the accounts of the five named Executive Officers and the
remaining $36,792 was allocated primarily to the accounts of employees in
sales and sales management positions whose compensation subjected them to the
compensation limitations, none of whom was an Executive Officer of the
Company. In addition, during 1995, participants' accounts under the Excess
Benefit Plan accrued interest at 8.5%, which was the base (prime) lending
rate in effect on January 3, 1995 at The First National Bank of Boston.
The Company in 1994 adopted a non-qualified, unfunded Key Employee
Retirement Plan. Under the Key Employee Retirement Plan, an account is
established for each of the named Executive Officers, with a book entry
credited on January 1 of each year, based upon the Benefit Percentage
determined under the plan multiplied by each participant's prior year's total
cash compensation. The Benefit Percentage ranges from 0% to 20%, depending
upon the three year moving average rate of return on the Company's
stockholders' equity, with tiers ranging, on the low side, from "less than
5%" return on stockholders' equity, generating a Benefit Percentage of "0%",
to, on the high side, an "18% or greater" return on stockholders' equity,
generating a Benefit Percentage of 20%. The tier levels of return on
stockholders' equity were established subjectively, using as reference points
the average rates of return on stockholders' equity achieved by companies
comprising the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrials. For 1995, the Benefit
Percentage was 16%, based upon the average of the Company's 1993, 1994 and
1995 returns on stockholders' equity being 16.5%, resulting in an aggregate
benefit allocation for all participants of $257,744. In addition, during
1995, participants' accounts under the Key Employee Retirement Plan accrued
interest at 8.5%, which was the base (prime) lending rate in effect on
January 3, 1995 at The First National Bank of Boston.
COMPENSATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
During 1995, the base salary of Mr. John W. McConnell, President and CEO
of the Company, remained unchanged. Mr. McConnell was paid short term cash
incentive compensation awards totaling approximately 95% of base salary,
based upon (i) the Corporation's pre-tax earnings for 1995, as compared to
budget, resulting in an incentive award equal to approximately 67% of base
salary, and (ii) the trading price of the Corporation's stock during 1995, as
compared to hurdle levels subjectively established by the Committee,
resulting in an incentive award equal to approximately 28% of base salary.
As noted above, Mr. McConnell was not awarded any stock warrants or
other long term incentives during 1995. Mr. McConnell received benefit
allocations for 1995 (a) determined on a basis consistent with all other
participating employees of the Company, of $5,220 under the Savings/Profit
Sharing Plan, (b) determined on a basis consistent with all affected
employees, of $11,879 under the Excess Benefit Plan and (c) determined on a
basis consistent with all named Executive Officers, of $91,554 under the Key
Employee Retirement Plan. As noted above, Mr. McConnell has been granted
Company paid term life insurance, at a premium cost in 1995 of $5,724.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
From January 1, 1995 From November 17, 1995
to November 17, 1995: through December 31, 1995:
Russell A. Belinsky, Chairman Russell A. Belinsky, Chairman
Philip L. Herrington Philip L. Herrington
William C. Scott Ronald Langley
Performance Graph
The following graph shows the annual cumulative stockholder return for
the periods from December 31, 1990 through July 2, 1992 and September 1, 1992
through December 31, 1995, following assumed investments of $100 each in
shares of Company common stock on each of December 31, 1990 and September 1,
1992, respectively. All shares of Company common stock, $.10 par value (the
"Old Common Stock"), that were outstanding and traded during the period of
December 31, 1990 through July 2, 1992 were canceled prior to the Company's
reorganization in September 1992, under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (the "Reorganization"), and no distributions were made on
account of interests in such securities. All shares of Common Stock that are
currently outstanding are shares that were issued after September 1, 1992
(and after cancellation of the Old Common Stock) pursuant to, or following,
the Reorganization.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN OF COMPANY COMMON STOCK
BEFORE AND AFTER REORGANIZATION WITH THE S&P 500 AND NASDAQ U.S.
INDEXES AND NYSE AND NASDAQ MARKET CAPITALIZATION PEER GROUPS (1),(2),(3)
OLD COMMON STOCK
12/31/90 12/31/91 7/2/92
FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES 100 143.00 0.00
S&P 500 100 130.40 130.68
NYSE PEER GROUP 100 97.78 124.80
NASDAQ U.S. 100 160.56 154.18
NASDAQ PEER GROUP 100 155.41 124.92
NEW COMMON STOCK
9/1/92 12/31/92 12/31/93 12/31/94 12/31/95
FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES 100 100.00 300.00 366.67 475.00
S&P 500 100 106.26 116.92 118.46 162.93
NYSE PEER GROUP 100 108.76 112.65 143.67 122.38
NASDAQ U.S. 100 120.66 138.52 135.40 191.33
NASDAQ PEER GROUP 100 102.94 106.61 125.74 129.77
- -------------------
(1) The amounts plotted in the left-hand box entitled "Old Common Stock" in
the graph represent the cumulative total return of the Old Common Stock
outstanding prior to the Company's Reorganization (i.e., during the
period December 31, 1990 through July 2, 1992 when trading in the Old
Common Stock was suspended permanently by the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE")), which amounts are compared with (i) the S&P 500 Index, a
broad equity market index, (ii) the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.'s Automated Quotations System ("NASDAQ") Stock Market U.S.
Index, (iii) a peer group constructed of NYSE listed companies with
similar market capitalization (the "NYSE Market Capitalization Peer
Group") and (iv) a peer group constructed of NASDAQ listed companies
with similar market capitalization (the "NASDAQ Market Capitalization
Peer Group"). During 1995, the Company's Common Stock was listed for
trading on The NASDAQ Stock Market, until December 20, 1995, when the
Company's Common Stock was listed for trading on the NYSE.
(2) The data which appear in the right-hand box entitled "New Common Stock"
in the graph compare the cumulative total return of the new Common Stock
outstanding subsequent to the Company's Reorganization (i.e., during the
period September 1, 1992 through December 31, 1995) with (i) the S&P 500
Index, (ii) the NASDAQ Stock Market U.S. Index, (iii) the NYSE Market
Capitalization Peer Group and (iv) the NASDAQ Market Capitalization Peer
Group.
(3) The Company's primary operation is the Leisure Products business, with
the major sources of revenue and profitability being the sale of
vacation ownership intervals and interest income from installment
contracts receivable originated in connection with such sales. Only a
few other publicly held companies engage in this line of business.
Prominent among this limited group are The Walt Disney Company, Hilton
Hotels Corporation and Host Marriott Corporation, which are (i)
diversified, with such companies' similar product segments providing
substantially less than 50% of such companies' revenues, and (ii)
substantially larger, in terms of revenue, assets and market
capitalization, than the Company. Because of these factors, the Company
elected to compare the performance of its stock to the S&P 500 Index and
the NYSE Market Capitalization Peer Group. Because of the prior listing
of the Common Stock on The NASDAQ Stock Market, the Company's proxy
statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting contained a comparison of the
performance of the Company's common stock to the NASDAQ Stock Market
U.S. Index and the NASDAQ Market Capitalization Peer Group. Because of
the December 20, 1995 listing of the Common Stock on the NYSE, the
Company is required to use a broad based index which includes companies
listed on the NYSE, and has elected also to change the market
capitalization peer group from NASDAQ listed companies to NYSE listed
companies. Pursuant to applicable SEC requirements, the stock
performance graph has been prepared to compare the performance of the
Company's common stock to the two NASDAQ Stock Market based indices used
in the proxy statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting, as well as the two
NYSE based indices chosen by the Company for use in this Proxy
Statement.
The NYSE Market Capitalization Peer Group is comprised of 10 NYSE
companies immediately above and below the Company's December 31, 1995
market capitalization ($87.974 million), as follows: Zapata Corp.
(ZAP); Mestek, Inc. (MCC); Katy Industries (KT); ICF Kaiser Intl, Inc.
(ICF); American Media (ENQ); Wackenhut Corp. (WAK); Advest Group, Inc.
(ADV); Mid-American Waste Systems (MAW); Oriental Bank & Trust (OBT);
Wainco Oil Co. (WOL); Levitz Furniture, Inc. (LFI); Nashua Corp. (NSH);
Zemex (ZMX); Genesco, Inc. (GCO); Cooper Companies (COO); Talley
Industries (TAL); Watsco (WSO); Gray Communications Sys. (GCS); Cooker
Restaurant (CGR); and Worldtex (WTX).
The NASDAQ Market Capitalization Peer Group is comprised of 10 NASDAQ
companies immediately above and below the Company's December 31, 1995
market capitalization, as follows: Sullivan Dental Products (SULL);
Easco, Inc. (ESCO); Staar Surgical Co. (STAA); Arakis Energy Corp.
(AKSEF); Norand Corp. (NRND); Paradigm Technology, Inc. (PRDM); Parkvale
Financial Corp. (PVSA); Richardson Electric Ltd. (RELL); PSC Inc.
(PSCX); Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK); Ottawa Financial Corp. (OFCP);
Sangstat Medical Corp. (SANG); Bachman Information Systems (BACH);
Atkinson (G.F.) Co. (ATKN); Bally Gaming Intl, Inc. (BGII); Norton
McNaughton, Inc. (NRTY); Mecon Inc. (MECN); HMN Financial, Inc. (HMNF);
Biocryst Pharmacueticals (BCRX); and Sun Bancorp, Inc. (SUBI).
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES
Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth certain information as of February 29,
1996 with respect to any persons known by the Company to be the beneficial
owner of more than five percent of the Common Stock:
Name and Address of Amount and Nature of Percent of
Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership Class (b)
- ------------------ -------------------- ----------
Physicians Insurance Company of Ohio
13515 Yarmouth Drive, NW 1,962,126(a) 19.7%
Pickerington, Ohio 43147
- ------------------
(a) A report on Schedule 13D has been filed with the SEC by Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio and two of its wholly-owned subsidiary
companies ("PICO") indicating that PICO has sole voting and dispositive
power over 1,962,126 shares. The foregoing information has been
included in reliance upon, and without independent verification of, the
disclosures contained in the above-referenced report on Schedule 13D.
(b) Calculated based on 9,946,553 shares outstanding as of February 29,
1996. The total amount of Common Stock to be issued after resolution of
all claims under the plan of reorganization will differ from the amount
of Common Stock outstanding at February 29, 1996. Consequently, the
ownership interest of existing stockholders will be diluted.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information as of February 29,
1996 with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock
by each of the non-management directors and nominees, each of the named
executive officers and by all directors, director nominees and executive
officers as a group. Except as noted, each individual named has sole
investment and voting power with respect to his shares of Common Stock.
Amount and Nature of Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Owner Class
----------------------- ---------------- -----
Non-Management Russell A. Belinsky 9,000(a) *
Directors and Ernest D. Bennett, III 5,000(a) *
Director Daryl J. Butcher 15,000(a) *
Nominees Philip L. Herrington 5,000(a) *
Ronald Langley 0(b) 0
Bryan D. Langton 0 0
Charles D. Morgan, Jr. 0 0
William C. Scott 25,000(c) *
Named Executive John W. McConnell 208,000(d) 2.0
Officers Clayton G. Gring, Sr. 40,024(e) *
Marcel J. Dumeny 136,000(e) 1.3
Robert W. Howeth 63,000(e) *
Morris E. Meacham 100,000(e) 1.0
All Directors and Executive
Officers as a Group 623,024 6.0(f)
- ----------------------
* Beneficial ownership represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares.
(a) Includes 5,000 shares that each of the indicated persons has the right
to acquire (through the exercise of warrants) within 60 days after
February 29, 1996.
(b) Excludes 1,962,126 shares held by PICO, as to which Mr. Langley
disclaims beneficial ownership.
(c) Includes 5,000 shares which Mr. Scott has the right to acquire (through
the exercise of warrants) within 60 days after February 29, 1996.
Includes 20,000 shares held by Mr. Scott's wife, as to which Mr. Scott
disclaims beneficial ownership.
(d) Includes 150,000 shares which Mr. McConnell has the right to acquire
(through the exercise of warrants) within 60 days after February 29,
1996. Includes 53,000 shares held by Mr. McConnell's wife, as to which
Mr. McConnell disclaims beneficial ownership.
(e) Includes shares that each of the indicated persons has the right to
acquire (through the exercise of warrants) within 60 days after February
29, 1996, as follows: Marcel J. Dumeny (100,000), Robert W. Howeth
(40,000), Clayton G. Gring, Sr. (40,000) and Morris E. Meacham
(100,000).
(f) Calculated based on 10,417,553 shares outstanding as of February 29,
1996, which includes 471,000 shares that the directors and executive
officers have the right to acquire (through the exercise of warrants)
within sixty days after February 29, 1996. The total amount of Common
Stock to be issued after resolution of all claims under the plan of
reorganization will differ from the amount of Common Stock outstanding
at February 29, 1996. Consequently, the ownership interest of existing
stockholders will be diluted.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors and
executive officers, and certain persons who own more than 10% of its Common
Stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it
with respect to the year ended December 31, 1995, and written representations
from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that all filing
requirements have been complied with as they apply to its directors,
executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of the Common Stock,
except that a Form 4 was filed late by Russell A. Belinsky, Ernest D.
Bennett, III, Daryl J. Butcher, Philip L. Herrington, Ronald Langley and
William C. Scott with respect to stock warrants granted in November 1995 to
each of the outside directors of the Company to purchase 3,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock.
Independent Public Accountants
The Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP to serve as independent public
accountants for the Company. The independent public accountants have audited
the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1995 and performed such other nonaudit services as the Company requested.
A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the
Annual Meeting. This representative will have the opportunity to make a
statement, if he or she so desires, and is also expected to be available to
respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Stockholder Proposals
If stockholder proposals are to be considered by the Company for
inclusion in a proxy statement for a future meeting of the stockholders, such
proposals must be submitted on a timely basis and must meet the requirements
established by the SEC. Stockholder proposals for the Company's 1997 annual
meeting of stockholders will not be deemed to be timely submitted unless they
are received by the Company at its principal executive offices by December 2,
1996. Such stockholder proposals, together with any supporting statements,
should be directed to the Secretary of the Company. Stockholders submitting
proposals are urged to submit their proposals by certified mail, return
receipt requested.
Additional Information Available
A copy of the Form 10-K as filed with the SEC will be provided without
charge to each person solicited who submits a written request therefor,
stating that such person was a beneficial owner of Common Stock on March 25,
1996, addressed to Robert W. Howeth, Treasurer, Fairfield Communities, Inc.,
2800 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202.
Other Business
Management does not know of or intend to bring before the Annual Meeting
any other business. If, however, any other business should be presented to
the meeting, the proxies named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the
proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING, PLEASE SIGN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM OF PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE
PREPAID RETURN ENVELOPE.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Marcel J. Dumeny
Marcel J. Dumeny
Secretary
Little Rock, Arkansas
April 1, 1996
<PAGE>
FORM OF PROXY CARD
FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC.
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
of Fairfield Communities, Inc. for use at the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on May 9, 1996
The undersigned hereby appoints John W. McConnell and Marcel J. Dumeny,
and each of them, jointly and severally and with full power of substitution,
as Proxies to vote, as designated below, all common stock of Fairfield
Communities, Inc. owned by the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 9, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. Central
Daylight Savings Time at The Capital Hotel, 111 West Markham Street, Little
Rock, Arkansas, and at any and all postponements and adjournments thereof.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION FOR VOTING IS GIVEN,
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JUDGMENT OF THE
PERSON OR PERSONS VOTING THE PROXY WITH RESPECT TO ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT
MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING.
<REVERSE SIDE>
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1.
1. Election of Directors
Nominees: Russell A. Belinsky, Ernest D. Bennett, III,
Philip L. Herrington, Ronald Langley, Bryan D. Langton,
John W. McConnell, Charles D. Morgan, Jr., William C. Scott
FOR WITHHELD
_ _
|_| |_|
_
|_|____________________________________
For all nominees except as noted above
Please complete, date, sign and return
this proxy promptly in the enclosed
envelope. If signing as attorney,
executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as
such. If signing on behalf of a
corporation, please sign in full
corporate name by an authorized officer.
If shares are registered in more than
one name, all holders must sign. The
undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt
of the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the Proxy Statement and
the Annual Report to Stockholders for
the year ended December 31, 1995
furnished therewith.
Signature: _____________ Date: ______ Signature: _____________ Date: ______
