SEMCO ENERGY INC
8-K, 1999-11-12
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION
Previous: GRAINGER W W INC, 10-Q, 1999-11-12
Next: FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP /DE/, 10-Q, 1999-11-12



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C.  20549





                                    FORM 8-K





                                 CURRENT REPORT
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
                      OF THE SEURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



                       Date of Report:  November 12, 1999



                               SEMCO ENERGY, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




          MICHIGAN           0-8503             38-2144267
     (State  or  other     (Commission     (I.R.S.  Employer
     jurisdiction  of     File  Number)     Identification  No.)
     incorporation)




     405  WATER  STREET,  PORT  HURON,  MICHIGAN     48060
     (Address  of  principal  executive  offices)     (Zip  Code)



     Registrant's  telephone  number,  including  area  code     810-987-2200


<PAGE>
ITEM  2.     ACQUISITION  OF  ASSETS.

     On  November  1,  1999,  SEMCO  Energy, Inc. ("SEMCO Energy") closed on its
previously  announced  acquisition  of  ENSTAR  Natural  Gas  Company and Alaska
Pipeline  Company (together known as "ENSTAR").  The Anchorage-based natural gas
distribution and natural gas transmission companies were formerly owned by Ocean
Energy,  Inc.  SEMCO  Energy acquired ENSTAR for approximately $290.5 million in
cash,  which  includes  adjustments  for  working  capital  and  the purchase of
approximately $58.7 million of ENSTAR debt held by Ocean Energy, and the accrued
interest  thereon.

     The acquisition was approved by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and the
Federal  Trade  Commission  and has been financed initially through a short-term
credit  facility  from  a syndicate of banks until permanent financing of equity
and  long-term debt is arranged.     With the completion of the acquisition, the
Company  will be reorganized so that ENSTAR Natural Gas Company and SEMCO Energy
Gas  Company  operate  as  divisions of SEMCO Energy and Alaska Pipeline Company
operates as a subsidiary of SEMCO Energy.  The acquisition will be accounted for
using  the  purchase  method  of  accounting.

     Within  60  days  of the date of this report, SEMCO Energy will file a Form
8-K  containing  ENSTAR's  combined  statements  of  financial  position  as  of
September  30,  1999,  December  31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, and the related
combined  statements  of  income  and  cash  flows  for each of the years in the
three-year  period  ended     December  31,  1998  and for the nine months ended
September 30, 1999 and 1998.  In addition, the Form 8-K will include a pro forma
combined  statement of financial position as of September 30, 1999 and pro forma
statements  of  income  for the year ended December 31, 1998 and the nine months
ended  September  30,  1999.


ITEM  7.(c)     EXHIBITS.
     99.1     Regulatory  Commission  of  Alaska  Order  Approving Applications,
Subject  to  Conditions;  and  Requiring  Filings.



<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES
                                   ----------

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf by the
undersigned  thereunto  duly  authorized.

                                         SEMCO  Energy,  Inc.
                                             (Registrant)


Dated:  November  12,  1999               By:/s/Sebastian Coppola
                                             _________________________________
                                             Sebastian  Coppola
                                             Senior  Vice  President  and
                                             Chief  Financial  Officer

<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX
                                    Form 8-K
                                November 12, 1999

     -  4  -
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       EXHIBIT INDEX
                                                         Form 8-K
                                                     November 12, 1999





Exhibit No.  Description                                                                             Filed
- -----------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------   --------------------------------------
                                                                                     Herewith                  By Reference
                                                                                     ---------                 ------------
<C>          <S>                                                                     <C>                        <C>
   99.1       Regulatory Commission of Alaska Order Approving Applications,              X
              Subject to Conditions; and Requiring Filings.
</TABLE>

                 STATE  OF  ALASKA

            THE  REGULATORY  COMMISSION  OF  ALASKA

BEFORE  COMMISSIONERS:             G.  NANETTE  THOMPSON,  CHAIR
                        BERNIE  SMITH
                        PATRICIA  M.  DEMARCO
                        WILL  ABBOTT
                        JAMES  S.  STRANDBERG


IN  THE  MATTER  OF  THE  APPLICATION  FOR  )
TRANSFER  OF  THE  CERTIFICATE  OF  PUBLIC  )       U-99-93
CONVENIENCE  AND  NECESSITY  NO.  4  TO     )
OPERATE  AS  A  NATURAL  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  )      ORDER  NO.  1
PUBLIC  UTILITY  FROM  OCEAN  ENERGY,       )
INC.,  TO  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.             )
- --------------------------------------------
IN  THE  MATTER  OF  THE  APPLICATION  FOR  )       U-99-94
APPROVAL  OF  THE  TRANSFER  OF  CONTROL    )
OF  ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY,  HOLDER  OF  )      ORDER  NO.  1
CERTIFICATE  OF  PUBLIC  CONVENIENCE  AND   )
NECESSITY  NO.  141  TO  OPERATE  AS  A     )
NATURAL  GAS  PIPELINE,  FROM  OCEAN        )
ENERGY,  INC.,  TO  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.    )
- --------------------------------------------

          ORDER  APPROVING  APPLICATIONS,  SUBJECT  TO
            CONDITIONS;  AND  REQUIRING  FILINGS


BY  THE  COMMISSION:

ON  JULY  30,  1999,  OCEAN  ENERGY,  INC.  (OCEAN),  AND  SEMCO
ENERGY,  INC.  (SEMCO),  FILED  JOINT  APPLICATIONS  FOR  APPROVAL  OF  THE
TRANSFER  OF  CERTIFICATE  OF  PUBLIC  CONVENIENCE  AND  NECESSITY
(CERTIFICATE)  NO.  4,  HELD  BY  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY  (ENSTAR),
AND  FOR  A  TRANSFER  OF  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  ALASKA  PIPELINE
COMPANY  (APLC),  HOLDER  OF  CERTIFICATE  NO.  141  (DOCKETS  U-99-93  AND




U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)  -  (10/19/99)
PAGE  1  OF  6

<PAGE>
U-99-94,  RESPECTIVELY).  IN  EACH  CASE  THE  REQUESTED  TRANSFERS  WERE
FROM  OCEAN  TO  SEMCO.

ENSTAR  IS  CURRENTLY  A  DIVISION  OF  OCEAN.  APLC  IS
CURRENTLY  A  WHOLLY-OWNED  SUBSIDIARY  OF  OCEAN.  CERTIFICATE  NO.  4
AUTHORIZES  ENSTAR  TO  OPERATE  AS  A  NATURAL  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  PUBLIC
UTILITY  AND  CERTIFICATE  NO.  141  AUTHORIZES  APLC  TO  OPERATE  A
NATURAL  GAS  TRANSMISSION  PIPELINE  SYSTEM.  ENSTAR  AND  APLC  ARE
SUBJECT  TO  ECONOMIC  REGULATION  AND  ARE  MANAGED  AND  REGULATED
TOGETHER  AS  A  SINGLE  UNIT.

OCEAN  AND  SEMCO  REQUESTED  THAT  THE  APPLICATIONS  BE
APPROVED  BY  THE  COMMISSION  IN  A  FINAL  ORDER  ISSUED  NO  LATER  THAN
NOVEMBER  30,  1999,  AND  THAT  THE  ORDER  ALSO  STATE  THAT  NO  OTHER
REGULATORY  APPROVALS  ARE  REQUIRED  FROM  THE  COMMISSION.

THE  APPLICATIONS  WERE  NOTICED  TO  THE  PUBLIC  ON  AUGUST  5,
1999,  WITH  A  CLOSING  DATE  OF  SEPTEMBER  7,  1999,  FOR  SUBMISSION  OF
COMMENTS  IN  FAVOR  OF,  OR  IN  OPPOSITION  TO,  THE  FILINGS.

ON  SEPTEMBER  7,  1999,  MARATHON  OIL  COMPANY  AND  MARATHON
ALASKA  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY  (COLLECTIVELY  MARATHON)  FILED  COMMENTS
EXPRESSING  CONCERN  THAT  SEMCO  WAS  PAYING  CONSIDERABLY  MORE  THAN
BOOK  VALUE  FOR  THE  ASSETS  OF  ENSTAR/APLC  AND  WAS  CONCERNED  ABOUT
THE  ASSOCIATED  IMPACT  ON  RATES.  MARATHON  POINTED  OUT  THAT
ENSTAR/APLC  ARE  LONG  OVERDUE  FOR  A  RATE  CASE  AND  EXPRESSED  CONCERN
REGARDING  THE  POTENTIAL  FOR  SUBSIDIZATION  OF  SEMCO'S  OTHER
OPERATIONS.  MARATHON  ALSO  RECOMMENDED  THAT  THE  COMMISSION  ADDRESS
RISKS  TO  THE  PUBLIC  AND  IMPOSE  THE  SAME  CONDITIONS  ON  ENSTAR/APLC


U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)  -  (10/19/99)
PAGE  2  OF  6

<PAGE>
AS  IT  DID  IN  DOCKET  NO.  U-84-67.(1)  ON  SEPTEMBER  14,  1999,
ENSTAR/APLC  FILED  ITS  RESPONSE  TO  MARATHON'S  COMMENTS.

ON  SEPTEMBER  22,  1999,  STAFF  SUBMITTED  ITS  ANALYSIS  AND
RECOMMENDATION  (REPORT)  REGARDING  THE  JOINT  APPLICATIONS.  STAFF'S
REPORT  SETS  OUT  IN  DETAIL  THE  HISTORY  OF  THE  PROCEEDINGS,  THE
PUBLIC  NOTICING  OF  THE  APPLICATIONS,  AND  STAFF'S  FINDINGS  AND
RECOMMENDATIONS  REGARDING  DISPOSITION  OF  THE  APPLICATIONS.  A  COPY
OF  STAFF'S  REPORT  IS  ATTACHED  TO  THIS  ORDER  AS  AN  APPENDIX.

AMONG  OTHER  THINGS,  STAFF  CONCLUDED  THAT  SEMCO  IS  FIT,
WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ASSUME  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  ENSTAR/APLC,
THAT  THE  PROPOSED  TRANSFERS  ARE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST,  AND  THAT
CONTINGENT  UPON  CLOSING  THE  TRANSFERS,  THEY  SHOULD  BE  APPROVED,
SUBJECT  TO  CONDITIONS.


                  DISCUSSION

THE  COMMISSION'S  STANDARD  FOR  EVALUATING  APPLICATIONS
OF  THIS  TYPE  IS  WHETHER  THE  PROPOSED  TRANSFER  IS  AFFIRMATIVELY
CONSISTENT  WITH  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST  UNDER  THE  CRITERIA  FOR
CERTIFICATION  SET  OUT  IN  AS  42.05.  THE  COMMISSION  HAS  CAREFULLY
CONSIDERED  THE  EVIDENCE  PRESENTED  IN  THIS  PROCEEDING,  INCLUDING
STAFF'S  RECOMMENDATION  IN  LIGHT  OF  THIS  STANDARD,  AND  CONCLUDES
THAT  THE  APPLICATION  SHOULD  BE  APPROVED.  THE  COMMISSION  FINDS

______________
(1)  THIS  DOCKET  IS  ENTITLED:  IN  THE  MATTER  OF  THE  APPLICATION
BY  SEAGULL  ENERGY  CORPORATION  TO  ACQUIRE  FROM  ENSTAR  CORPORATION
THE  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  DIVISION  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY,  HOLDER
OF  CERTIFICATE  OF  PUBLIC  CONVENIENCE  AND  NECESSITY  NO.  4,  AND  THE
STOCK  OF  ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY,  HOLDER  OF  CERTIFICATE  OF  PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE  AND  NECESSITY  NO.  141.

U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)  -  (10/19/99)
PAGE  3  OF  6

<PAGE>
THAT  BENEFITS  WOULD  RESULT  FROM  THE  PROPOSED  TRANSFER,  THAT  THE
TRANSFER  IS  CONSISTENT  WITH  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST,  AND  THAT  ANY
POTENTIAL  RISKS  CAN  BE  MITIGATED  BY  PLACING  CONDITIONS  ON  THE
CERTIFICATE.  ACCORDINGLY,  THE  COMMISSION  ACCEPTS  STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION  TO  APPROVE  THE  APPLICATIONS  SUBJECT  TO  CONDITIONS
MORE  FULLY  DELINEATED  IN  STAFF'S  REPORT  AND  AS  DISCUSSED  IN  THIS
ORDER.  STAFF'S  REPORT  IS  INCORPORATED  HEREIN  BY  REFERENCE  AND
ADOPTED  AS  THE  COMMISSION'S  FINDINGS  OF  FACT  AND  CONCLUSIONS  OF
LAW.

THE  COMMISSION  REMINDS  ENSTAR  AND  APLC  THAT  ALL
COMMITMENTS  AND  OBLIGATIONS  MADE  BY  THEM  OR  PLACED  ON  THEM  BY  THIS
COMMISSION  REMAIN  IN  EFFECT  UNDER  THE  OWNERSHIP  CHANGE  APPROVED
BY  THIS  ORDER.


                   ORDER

THE  COMMISSION  FURTHER  ORDERS:

1.   THE  JOINT  APPLICATION  FILED  BY  OCEAN  ENERGY,  INC.,
AND  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  TO  TRANSFER  OWNERSHIP  OF  CERTIFICATE  OF
PUBLIC  CONVENIENCE  AND  NECESSITY  NO.  4  HELD  BY  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS
COMPANY  TO  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  IS  APPROVED,  CONTINGENT  UPON
CLOSING  THE  TRANSFER  AND  SUBJECT  TO  THE  CONDITIONS  SET  OUT  IN
ORDERING  PARAGRAPH  NOS.  3  THROUGH  10  OF  THIS  ORDER.

2.   THE  JOINT  APPLICATION  FILED  BY  OCEAN  ENERGY,  INC.,
AND  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  TO  TRANSFER  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  ALASKA
PIPELINE  COMPANY  TO  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  IS  APPROVED,  CONTINGENT

U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)  -  (10/19/99)
PAGE  4  OF  6

<PAGE>
UPON  CLOSING  THE  TRANSFER  AND  SUBJECT  TO  CONDITIONS  SET  OUT  IN
ORDERING  PARAGRAPH  NOS.  3  THROUGH  10,  BELOW.


3.   WITHIN  TEN  DAYS  AFTER  CLOSING  THE  TRANSFER,  OCEAN
ENERGY,  INC.,  AND  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  SHALL  NOTIFY  THE  COMMISSION
OF  THE  FINAL  CLOSING  DATE  OF  THE  PURCHASE  AND  SALE  AGREEMENT
REFERRED  TO  IN  THE  COMMISSION  STAFF  REPORT  ATTACHED  AS  AN  APPENDIX
HERETO.

4.   BY  THIS  ORDER,  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY/ALASKA
PIPELINE  COMPANY  ARE  PUT  ON  NOTICE  THAT  NO  ACQUISITION  ADJUSTMENT
WILL  BE  ALLOWED  IN  ASSOCIATION  WITH  THESE  TRANSACTIONS  FOR
PURPOSES  OF  SETTING  RATES  IN  FUTURE  RATE  PROCEEDINGS  UNLESS  THE
COMMISSION  WERE  TO  DETERMINE  A  SHOWING  HAS  BEEN  MADE  THAT  IT  WOULD
BE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST.

5.   BY  4  P.M.,  JULY  1,  2000,  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS
COMPANY/ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY  SHALL  FILE  WITH  THE  COMMISSION,
IN  A  NEW  DOCKET,  THE  DOCUMENTATION  REQUIRED  BY  3  AAC  48.275(A)  AND
3  AAC  48.275(H)  USING  FINANCIAL  DATA  FOR  THE  YEAR  1999.
MEANWHILE,  THE  CURRENT  RATES  OF  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY/ALASKA
PIPELINE  COMPANY  SHALL  BE  ALLOWED  TO  REMAIN  IN  EFFECT  ON  AN
INTERIM  BASIS.

6.   SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  SHALL  MAINTAIN  THE  ACCOUNT  AND
OPERATING  BOOKS  AND  RECORDS  OF  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY  AND
ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY  SEPARATE  FROM  EACH  OTHER  AND  FROM  THE
BOOKS  OF  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  AND  ITS  AFFILIATES.

U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)  -  (10/19/99)
PAGE  5  OF  6

<PAGE>
7.   SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  IS  PROHIBITED  FROM  ENCUMBERING
ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY/ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY  ASSETS  BY  USING
THEM  AS  COLLATERAL  FOR  FINANCING  NON-UTILITY  OR  NON-REGULATED
UTILITY  BUSINESS  ACTIVITIES.

8.   SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  IS  PROHIBITED  FROM  SELLING  GAS
CURRENTLY  UNDER  CONTRACT  TO  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY/ALASKA
PIPELINE  COMPANY  TO  ANOTHER  ENTITY  AND  SHALL  CONTINUE  TO  BE
REQUIRED  TO  SUBMIT  FUTURE  GAS  SUPPLY  CONTRACTS  TO  THE  COMMISSION
FOR  APPROVAL.

9.   WITHIN  FIFTEEN  DAYS  OF  THE  FINAL  CLOSING  DATE
REPORTED  TO  THE  COMMISSION  IN  ORDERING  PARAGRAPH  NO.  3  OF  THIS
ORDER,  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.,  SHALL  ADOPT,  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH
3  AAC  48.400  AND  3  AAC  48.410,  THE  EXISTING  TARIFF  FILED  BY  ENSTAR
NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY/ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY.

10.   WITHIN  THIRTY  DAYS  OF  THE  FINAL  CLOSING  DATE
REPORTED  TO  THE  COMMISSION  IN  ORDERING  PARAGRAPH  NO.  3  OF  THIS
ORDER,  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY/ALASKA  PIPELINE  COMPANY  SHALL
FILE  A  COMPLETE  TARIFF  REFLECTING  THE  CHANGE  IN  OWNERSHIP  FROM
OCEAN  ENERGY,  INC.,  TO  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.


DATED  AND  EFFECTIVE  AT  ANCHORAGE,  ALASKA,  THIS  19TH  DAY  OF
OCTOBER,  1999.

             BY  DIRECTION  OF  THE  COMMISSION
         (COMMISSIONERS  G.  NANETTE  THOMPSON,  CHAIR,  AND
            WILL  ABBOTT,  NOT  PARTICIPATING.)

(  S  E  A  L  )

U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)  -  (10/19/99)
PAGE  6  OF  6

<PAGE>
                 STATE  OF  ALASKA

            THE  REGULATORY  COMMISSION  OF  ALASKA
            1016  WEST  SIXTH  AVENUE,  SUITE  400
               ANCHORAGE,  ALASKA  99501
                M  E  M  O  R  A  N  D  U  M

TO:  COMMISSIONERS                          DATE:  SEPTEMBER  22,  1999
        G.  NANETTE  THOMPSON,  CHAIR
        BERNIE  SMITH
        PATRICIA  M.  DEMARCO
        WILL  ABBOTT
        JAMES  S.  STRANDBERG

FROM:   DONALD  W.  BAXTER,  P.E.
        UTILITY  ENGINEERING  ANALYST  IV

SUBJECT:   DOCKETS  U-99-93/94;  APPLICATIONS  FOR  TRANSFER  OF
           CERTIFICATE  AND  CONTROLLING  INTEREST


                STATEMENT  OF  CASE

BEFORE  THE  COMMISSION  ARE  JOINT  APPLICATIONS  FILED  BY  OCEAN
ENERGY,  INC.  (OCEAN)  AND  SEMCO  ENERGY,  INC.  (SEMCO)  FOR  APPROVAL
OF  THE  TRANSFER  OF  THE  CERTIFICATE  OF  PUBLIC  CONVENIENCE  AND
NECESSITY  (CERTIFICATE)  FOR  ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY  (ENSTAR),
AND  FOR  TRANSFER  OF  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  ALASKA  PIPELINE
COMPANY  (APLC),  FROM  OCEAN  TO  SEMCO  (DOCKETS  U-99-93  AND  U-99-94,
RESPECTIVELY).


                 RECOMMENDATION

1.   THE  COMMISSION  STAFF  (STAFF)  RECOMMENDS  THAT  SEMCO  BE  FOUND
FIT,  WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ACQUIRE  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN
ENSTAR  AND  APLC,  AND  THAT  THE  PROPOSED  TRANSFERS  BE  FOUND  TO  BE
IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST.  CONTINGENT  UPON  CLOSING  THE
TRANSFERS,  THE  APPLICATIONS  SHOULD  BE  APPROVED  SUBJECT  TO  THE
FOLLOWING  CONDITIONS:

- --   THAT  OCEAN/SEMCO  BE  REQUIRED  TO  NOTIFY  THE  COMMISSION  OF  THE
FINAL  CLOSING  DATE  OF  THE  PURCHASE  AND  SALE  AGREEMENT  (PURCHASE
AGREEMENT)  WITHIN  TEN  (10)  DAYS  THEREAFTER

- --   THAT  ENSTAR/APLC  BE  PLACED  ON  NOTICE  THAT  NO  ACQUISITION
ADJUSTMENT  WILL  BE  ALLOWED  IN  ASSOCIATION  WITH  THESE



STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94       ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                              APPENDIX
PAGE  1  OF  10                                                PAGE  1  OF  10

<PAGE>
TRANSACTIONS  FOR  PURPOSES  OF  SETTING  RATES  IN  FUTURE  RATE
PROCEEDINGS  UNLESS  THE  COMMISSION  WERE  TO  DETERMINE  A  SHOWING
HAS  BEEN  MADE  THAT  IT  WOULD  BE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST

- --   THAT  ENSTAR/APLC'S  RATES  BE  ALLOWED  TO  REMAIN  IN  EFFECT  ON  AN
INTERIM  BASIS  AND  THAT  THEY  BE  REQUIRED  TO  MAKE  A  FILING  IN
COMPLIANCE  WITH  3  AAC  48.275(A)  AND  3  AAC  48.275(H)  BY  JULY  1,
2000,  USING  FINANCIAL  DATA  FOR  THE  YEAR  1999

- --   THAT  SEMCO  BE  REQUIRED  TO  CONTINUE  THE  ESTABLISHED  PRACTICE
OF  MAINTAINING  THE  ACCOUNT  AND  OPERATING  BOOKS  AND  RECORDS  OF
ENSTAR  AND  APLC  SEPARATE  FROM  EACH  OTHER  AND  FROM  THE  BOOKS
OF  SEMCO  AND  ITS  AFFILIATES

- --   THAT  SEMCO  BE  PROHIBITED  FROM  ENCUMBERING  ENSTAR/APLC'S
ASSETS  BY  USING  THEM  AS  COLLATERAL  FOR  FINANCING  NON-UTILITY
OR  NON-REGULATED  UTILITY  BUSINESS  ACTIVITIES

- --   THAT  SEMCO  BE  PROHIBITED  FROM  SELLING  GAS  CURRENTLY  UNDER
CONTRACT  TO  ENSTAR/APLC  TO  ANOTHER  ENTITY  AND  CONTINUE  TO  BE
REQUIRED  TO  SUBMIT  FUTURE  GAS  SUPPLY  CONTRACTS  TO  THE
COMMISSION  FOR  APPROVAL

2.   SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  ALLOWED  TO  ADOPT  ENSTAR/APLC'S  EXISTING  TARIFF
IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  AND  BE  REQUIRED  TO  FILE  AN  ADOPTION  NOTICE  FOR
THE  TARIFF  AS  REQUIRED  IN  3  AAC  48.400,  AND  FOLLOW  THE
REQUIREMENTS  OF  THAT  REGULATION.  THE  ADOPTION  NOTICE  SHOULD
BE  FILED  WITHIN  15  DAYS  AFTER  THE  DATE  OF  CLOSING  OF  THE
PURCHASE  AGREEMENT.  STAFF  ALSO  RECOMMENDS  THAT  ENSTAR  BE
REQUIRED  TO  FILE  A  COMPLETE  TARIFF  REFLECTING  THE  CHANGE  IN
OWNERSHIP  OF  ENSTAR  AND  APLC  FROM  OCEAN  TO  SEMCO  NO  LATER  THAN
30  DAYS  AFTER  THE  DATE  THE  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT  IS  CLOSED.


                PROCEDURAL  HISTORY

ON  JULY  30,  1999,  OCEAN  AND  SEMCO  FILED  JOINT  APPLICATIONS
REQUESTING  APPROVAL  OF  THE  TRANSFER  OF  ENSTAR'S  CERTIFICATE  AND
FOR  TRANSFER  OF  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  APLC,  BOTH  FROM  OCEAN  TO
SEMCO.  OCEAN  AND  SEMCO  REQUESTED  THAT  THESE  REQUESTS  BE  APPROVED
BY  THE  COMMISSION  IN  A  FINAL  ORDER  ISSUED  NO  LATER  THAN  NOVEMBER
30,  1999,  AND  THAT  THE  ORDER  ALSO  STATE  THAT  NO  OTHER  REGULATORY
APPROVALS  ARE  REQUIRED  FROM  THE  COMMISSION  BY  OCEAN,  ENSTAR/APLC
OR  SEMCO  TO  EFFECTUATE  THESE  TRANSACTIONS.

ON  AUGUST  12,  SEPTEMBER  7,  SEPTEMBER  10,  SEPTEMBER  14,  AND
SEPTEMBER  17,  1999,  ADDITIONAL  INFORMATION  WAS  FILED  TO  SUPPLEMENT
THE  APPLICATIONS.

THE  APPLICATIONS  WERE  NOTICED  TO  THE  PUBLIC  ON  AUGUST  5,  1999,
WITH  COMMENTS  DUE  BY  SEPTEMBER  7,  1999.  ON  SEPTEMBER  7,  1999,

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94       ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                              APPENDIX
PAGE  2  OF  10                                                PAGE  2  OF  10

<PAGE>
MARATHON  OIL  COMPANY  AND  MARATHON  ALASKA  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY
(COLLECTIVELY  MARATHON)  FILED  COMMENTS  EXPRESSING  CONCERN  THAT
SEMCO  WAS  PAYING  CONSIDERABLY  MORE  THAN  BOOK  VALUE  FOR  THE  ASSETS
OF  ENSTAR/APLC  AND  WAS  CONCERNED  ABOUT  THE  ASSOCIATED  IMPACT  ON
RATES.  MARATHON  POINTED  OUT  THAT  ENSTAR/APLC  ARE  LONG  OVER  DUE
FOR  A  RATE  CASE  AND  EXPRESSED  CONCERN  REGARDING  THE  POTENTIAL  FOR
SUBSIDIZATION  OF  SEMCO'S  OTHER  OPERATIONS.  MARATHON  ALSO
RECOMMENDED  THAT  THE  COMMISSION  ADDRESS  RISKS  TO  THE  PUBLIC  AND
IMPOSE  THE  SAME  CONDITIONS  ON  ENSTAR/APLC  AS  IT  DID  IN  DOCKET  NO.
U-84-67.(1)  ON  SEPTEMBER  14,  1999,  ENSTAR/APLC  FILED  ITS  RESPONSE
TO  MARATHON'S  COMMENTS.


                   ISSUES

1.   SHOULD  ENSTAR'S  CERTIFICATE  AND  CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  APLC  BE
TRANSFERRED  TO  SEMCO?

- --   IS  SEMCO  FIT,  WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ASSUME  OWNERSHIP  AND
OPERATION  OF  ENSTAR  AND  APLC?
- --   IS  APPROVAL  OF  THE  APPLICATIONS  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST?

2.   IF  THE  TRANSFERS  ARE  APPROVED,  SHOULD  CONDITIONS  OR
REQUIREMENTS  BE  IMPOSED  UPON  SEMCO,  OCEAN,  AND/OR  ENSTAR/APLC?

3.   IF  THE  TRANSFERS  ARE  APPROVED,  SHOULD  ANY  ACTION  BE  TAKEN  WITH
RESPECT  TO  THE  ENSTAR/APLC  TARIFF?


           INFORMATION  REGARDING  ENSTAR  AND  APLC

ENSTAR,  HOLDER  OF  CERTIFICATE  NO.  4,  IS  CURRENTLY  A  DIVISION  OF
OCEAN  AND  APLC,  HOLDER  OF  CERTIFICATE  NO.  141,  IS  A  WHOLLY  OWNED
SUBSIDIARY  OF  OCEAN.(2)  CERTIFICATE  NO.  4  AUTHORIZES  ENSTAR  TO
OPERATE  AS  A  NATURAL  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  PUBLIC  UTILITY  AND
CERTIFICATE  NO.  141  AUTHORIZES  APLC  TO  OPERATE  A  NATURAL  GAS

________________
(1)THIS  DOCKET  IS  ENTITLED IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION BY SEAGULL ENERGY
CORPORATION  TO  ACQUIRE  FROM  ENSTAR CORPORATION THE GAS DISTRIBUTION DIVISION
ENSTAR  NATURAL  GAS  COMPANY,  HOLDER  OF CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY NO. 4, AND THE STOCK OF ALASKA PIPELINE COMPANY, HOLDER OF CERTIFICATE
OF  PUBLIC  CONVENIENCE  AND  NECESSITY  NO.  141.

(2)OCEAN  WAS  PREVIOUSLY  NAMED  SEAGULL  ENERGY CORPORATION (SEAGULL). SEAGULL
RECENTLY  ACQUIRED  OCEAN'S  PREDECESSOR  THROUGH  MERGER,  AND  THE  SURVIVING
CORPORATION RETAINED THE NAME OCEAN. THE MERGER AND NAME CHANGE WERE APPROVED BY
ORDER  U-98-184(1)  DATED MARCH 3, 1999. THE APPLICANTS INDICATED THE REASON FOR
THE  MERGER  WAS  TO  ALLOW  THE  TWO  COMPANIES  TO  BENEFIT  FROM CONSOLIDATED
OPERATIONS  AND  ECONOMIES OF SCALE BECAUSE THEY WERE BOTH INVOLVED WITH OIL AND
GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, AND WERE EXPERIENCING FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES DUE
TO  LOW  ENERGY  PRICES.

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94      ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                             APPENDIX
PAGE  3  OF  10                                               PAGE  3  OF  10

<PAGE>
TRANSMISSION  PIPELINE  SYSTEM,  BOTH  IN  SOUTHCENTRAL  ALASKA.(3)
ENSTAR  AND  APLC  ARE  SUBJECT  TO  ECONOMIC  REGULATION  AND  ARE
MANAGED  AND  REGULATED  TOGETHER  AS  A  SINGLE  UNIT.  ACCORDING  TO
ENSTAR/APLC'S  FEDERAL  ENERGY  REGULATORY  COMMISSION  FORM  NO.  2  FOR
THE  YEAR  ENDING  DECEMBER  31,  1998  (FERC  REPORT),  THEY  JOINTLY
HELD  TOTAL  ASSETS  OF  $194,646,291,  REALIZED  TOTAL  OPERATING
REVENUES  OF  $93,592,155,  AND  REALIZED  A  NET  UTILITY  OPERATING
INCOME  OF  $15,925,997.  THE  APPLICANTS  ASSERT  THAT  ENSTAR'S  RATES
ARE  AMONG  THE  LOWEST  IN  THE  NATION.


         ANALYSIS  OF  FITNESS,  WILLINGNESS,  AND  ABILITY

IS  SEMCO  FIT,  WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ASSUME  OWNERSHIP  AND  OPERATION
OF  ENSTAR  AND  APLC?

SEMCO  IS  A  MICHIGAN  CORPORATION,  INCORPORATED  IN  1977,  WITH  ITS
PRINCIPAL  OFFICES  IN  PORT  HURON.  IT  IS  PUBLICLY  TRADED  ON  THE
NASDAQ  STOCK  EXCHANGE  AND  IS  WIDELY  HELD.(4)  ACCORDING  TO  THE
APPLICATION  SEMCO  WAS  MOTIVATED  TO  PURCHASE  ENSTAR/APLC  BY  ITS
DESIRE  TO  EXPAND  ITS  CORE  BUSINESS,  THE  OWNERSHIP  AND  OPERATION
OF  NATURAL  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  UTILITIES.(5)

STAFF  BELIEVES  THE  COMMISSION  SHOULD  FIND  SEMCO  MANAGERIALLY  AND
TECHNICALLY  FIT,  WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ASSUME  MANAGEMENT  AND
CONTROL  OF  ENSTAR/APLC  FOR  A  VARIETY  OF  REASONS.  SEMCO  OWNS  THE
THIRD  LARGEST  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  UTILITY  IN  MICHIGAN  WITH  MORE  THAN
250,000  CUSTOMERS  AND  THEREFORE  HAS  A  PROVEN  TRACK  RECORD  FOR
PROVIDING  SERVICE.  THE  APPLICANTS  ASSERT  THAT  SEMCO  HAS
SIGNIFICANT  MANAGEMENT  SKILL  AND  EXPERIENCE.  STAFF  REVIEWED  THE
RESUMES  OF  KEY  SEMCO  PERSONNEL  AND  FOUND  THEM  TO  BE  WELL
QUALIFIED  FOR  THEIR  RESPECTIVE  POSITIONS.  THE  APPLICANTS  STATE
THAT  SEMCO  HAS  CONTINUOUSLY  MAINTAINED  THE  LOWEST  DISTRIBUTION
CHARGES  IN  MICHIGAN  FOR  ITS  CUSTOMERS.  THEY  ASSERT  THIS  IS  A
REFLECTION  OF  SEMCO'S  EMPHASIS  ON  HIGH  QUALITY  SERVICE  AND
PRODUCTIVITY  OF  ITS  EMPLOYEES.  THESE  ASSERTIONS  ARE  BACKED  BY
THE  RESULTS  OF  A  1997  SURVEY  OF  SEMCO'S  CUSTOMERS  THAT  WAS
INCLUDED  WITH  THE  APPLICATION  WHICH  SHOWS  A  HIGH  DEGREE  OF
CUSTOMER  SATISFACTION.  STAFF  CONTACTED  TWO  STAFF  MEMBERS  AND  ONE

_______________
(3)APLC'S  PIPELINES  CARRY  NATURAL GAS FROM THE KENAI PENINSULA AND BELUGA GAS
FIELDS  TO  ENSTAR'S  DISTRIBUTION  NETWORK  IN ANCHORAGE, THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA
VALLEY,  AND  PORTIONS  OF  THE  KENAI  PENINSULA.

(4)SEMCO'S  ONLY  LARGE  STOCKHOLDER,  JIMMY  C.  FOSTER,  IS  AN INDIVIDUAL WHO
ACQUIRED  A  5.1 PERCENT INTEREST AS A RESULT OF SEMCO'S ACQUISITION OF OILFIELD
MATERIALS  CONSULTANTS,  INC.

(5)IN  ADDITION  TO  ITS  REGULATED  UTILITY  BUSINESS,  SEMCO  OWNS A NUMBER OF
NON-REGULATED  BUSINESSES.  THESE INCLUDE SUBSIDIARIES IN SEVEN STATES PROVIDING
PIPELINE  CONSTRUCTION,  QUALITY  ASSURANCE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, AS WELL AS
PROPANE,  PIPELINE  AND  STORAGE  SERVICES.

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94    ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                           APPENDIX
PAGE  4  OF  10                                             PAGE  4  OF  10

<PAGE>
COMMISSIONER  AT  THE  MICHIGAN  PUBLIC  SERVICE  COMMISSION  (MPSC),
ALL  OF  WHICH  PROVIDED  FAVORABLE  COMMENTS  REGARDING  SEMCO.  THEY
STATED  THAT  SEMCO'S  RATES,  MANAGEMENT,  CUSTOMER  RELATIONS,  AND
RELATIONS  WITH  THE  MPSC  ARE,  FOR  THE  MOST  PART,  FAVORABLE  IN
COMPARISON  WITH  OTHER  MICHIGAN  GAS  UTILITIES,  AND  THAT  SEMCO  HAS
BEEN  INNOVATIVE  IN  A  VARIETY  OF  AREAS.

SEMCO  INDICATES  THAT  THE  CLIMATE  OF  ITS  MICHIGAN  UPPER  PENINSULA
SERVICE  AREA  IS  SIMILAR  TO  THAT  OF  SOUTHCENTRAL  ALASKA,  AND  THAT
ITS  DISTRIBUTION  FACILITIES  WERE  BUILT  ABOUT  THE  SAME  TIME  AS
ENSTAR'S,  IN  THE  EARLY  1960'S.  STAFF  THEREFORE  BELIEVES  THAT  THE
OPERATION  AND  MAINTENANCE  CHARACTERISTICS  OF  ENSTAR/APLC'S
FACILITIES  SHOULD  BE  VERY  SIMILAR  TO  THOSE  OF  SEMCO,  AND  THE  TWO
SYSTEMS  SHOULD  COMPLEMENT  EACH  OTHER.  SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  WELL
QUALIFIED  TO  OPERATE  ENSTAR/APLC'S  FACILITIES.

WHILE  SEMCO  BELIEVES  THAT  THERE  MAY  BE  LONG-TERM  OPPORTUNITIES  TO
ACHIEVE  CERTAIN  ECONOMIES  OF  SCALE  AND  TO  EXPAND  ENSTAR/APLC'S
BUSINESS,  IT  BELIEVES  THEY  ARE  ALREADY  WELL-MANAGED,  EFFICIENT
OPERATIONS  THAT  WILL  REQUIRE  FEW,  IF  ANY  SHORT-TERM  CHANGES.  THE
APPLICANTS  ASSERT  THAT  NO  CHANGE  IN  THE  CURRENT  MANAGEMENT  OR
TECHNICAL  RESOURCES  OF  ENSTAR/APLC  IS  ANTICIPATED.  ENSTAR/APLC
WILL  DRAW  UPON  SEMCO  FOR  CERTAIN  MANAGEMENT  SERVICES  UNDER
CONTRACTUAL  ARRANGEMENTS  SIMILAR  TO  AN  EXISTING  AGREEMENT  WITH
OCEAN.  RATES  WILL  STAY  THE  SAME  AND  ENSTAR/APLC  WILL  CONTINUE  TO
OPERATE  UNDER  ENSTAR'S  EXISTING  TARIFF.

FINANCIAL  FITNESS

INCLUDED  IN  THE  APPLICATION  WAS  SEMCO'S  UNAUDITED  SEC  FORM  10-Q
FOR  THE  QUARTER  ENDING  MARCH  31,  1999.  IT  INDICATES  THAT  SEMCO
HAD  TOTAL  ASSETS  OF  $414,759,000,  AND  TOTAL  LIABILITIES  OF
$270,325,000.  ITS  CURRENT  RATIO  WAS  1.40(6)  AND  ITS  DEBT  TO  EQUITY
RATIO  WAS  65%/35%.  THE  FORM  10-Q  INDICATE  THAT  SEMCO  HAD
OPERATING  REVENUES  OF  $594,895,000  AND  OPERATING  EXPENSES  OF
$566,189,000,  RESULTING  IN  AN  OPERATING  INCOME  OF  $28,706,000  FOR
THE  PREVIOUS  12-MONTH  PERIOD.  SEMCO  REALIZED  A  NET  INCOME  (WHICH
ALSO  REFLECTS  OTHER  INCOME,  INCOME  TAXES,  AND  AN  EXTRAORDINARY
CHARGE  DUE  TO  EARLY  RETIREMENT  OF  DEBT)  OF  $11,871,000.  STAFF
REVIEWED  SEMCO'S  UNAUDITED  SEC  FORM  10-Q  FOR  THE  QUARTER  ENDING
JUNE  30,  1999,  AND  SEMCO'S  AUDITED  SEC  FORM  10-K  FOR  THE  YEAR
ENDING  DECEMBER  31,  1998.(7)  THE  FORM  10-Q  INDICATES  THERE  WERE  NO
SIGNIFICANT  CHANGES  IN  SEMCO'S  FINANCIAL  STATUS  DURING  THE  SECOND
QUARTER  OF  1999.  THE  FORM  10-K  INDICATES  THAT  SEMCO  REALIZED
POSITIVE  OPERATING  CASH  FLOWS  OF  $11.0  MILLION,  $9.0  MILLION,  AND
$24.7  MILLION  DURING  THE  CALENDAR  YEARS  1996,  1997,  AND  1998,

____________________
(6)THERE  ARE  $1.40  IN  CURRENT  ASSETS FOR EACH $1.00 IN CURRENT LIABILITIES.

(7)THESE  DOCUMENTS  WERE  NOT  INCLUDED  WITH  THE  APPLICATION.

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94       ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                              APPENDIX
PAGE  5  OF  10                                                PAGE  5  OF  10

<PAGE>
RESPECTIVELY.  BASED  UPON  THE  ABOVE,  SEMCO  APPEARS  TO  BE  IN
SATISFACTORY  FINANCIAL  HEALTH.

FINANCING  FOR  THE  PURCHASE  WILL  BE  ACCOMPLISHED  IN  TWO  PHASES.  THE
FIRST  PHASE  WILL  CONSIST  OF  A  BRIDGE  LOAN  USED  TO  PAY  OCEAN  AT
CLOSING.  SEMCO  HAS  A  COMMITMENT  FOR  THIS  LOAN  FROM  BANK  OF  AMERICA
IN  THE  AMOUNT  OF  $260  MILLION.  THE  SECOND  PHASE  WILL  BE  TO  REPLACE
THE  BRIDGE  LOAN  WITH  LONG-TERM  FINANCING,  WHICH  WILL  CONSIST  OF  45
TO  55  PERCENT  EQUITY  CAPITAL  WITH  THE  REMAINDER  BEING  LONG-TERM
DEBT.  SEMCO  EXPECTS  TO  COMPLETE  THE  LONG-TERM  FINANCING  WITHIN
APPROXIMATELY  SIX  MONTHS  OF  CLOSING  AND  ASSERTS  THAT  IT  HAS
EXPERIENCE  IN  FINANCING  SUCH  TRANSACTIONS.

BASED  UPON  THE  ABOVE,  STAFF  BELIEVES  THAT  THE  COMMISSION  SHOULD
ALSO  FIND  SEMCO  FIT,  WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ACQUIRE  CONTROLLING
INTEREST  IN  ENSTAR  AND  APLC.


                 PUBLIC  INTEREST

IS  APPROVAL  OF  THE  APPLICATIONS  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST?

THE  ACQUISITIONS  ARE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST  FOR  A  VARIETY  OF
REASONS.  OCEAN  WAS  MOTIVATED  TO  SELL  ENSTAR/APLC  BY  A  DESIRE  TO
CONCENTRATE  ON  ITS  CORE  BUSINESS  OF  OIL  AND  GAS  EXPLORATION  AND
PRODUCTION  AND  TO  REDUCE  ITS  DEBT  IN  AN  ENVIRONMENT  OF  DECLINING
ENERGY  PRICES.  SEMCO  WAS  MOTIVATED  TO  PURCHASE  ENSTAR/APLC  BY
ITS  DESIRE  TO  EXPAND  ITS  CORE  BUSINESS,  WHICH  IS  THE  OWNERSHIP
AND  OPERATION  OF  NATURAL  GAS  DISTRIBUTION  UTILITIES,  AND  BECAUSE
OF  ITS  DESIRE  TO  SEEK  OTHER  RELATED  GROWTH  OPPORTUNITIES  IN
ALASKA.  THEREFORE,  ENSTAR/APLC  WILL  BECOME  A  PART  OF  A  GROWTH-ORIENTED
COMPANY  WITH  ITS  PRIMARY  FOCUS  ON  NATURAL  GAS  DISTRIBUTION.

FOR  CONSUMERS  IN  RURAL  AREAS  TO  RECEIVE  AND  ENJOY  THE  BENEFITS  OF
NATURAL  GAS  UTILITY  SERVICE,  EXPANSION  OF  ENSTAR/APLC'S
TRANSMISSION  AND  DISTRIBUTION  SYSTEM  IS  REQUIRED.  THE  APPLICANTS
STATED  THAT  SINCE  1991  SEMCO  HAS  ACHIEVED  AN  AVERAGE  CUSTOMER
GROWTH  RATE  OF  THREE  PERCENT  WHICH  IS  THE  HIGHEST  IN  MICHIGAN  AND
MORE  THAN  TWICE  THE  NATIONAL  AVERAGE.  THEY  STATE  THAT  SEMCO  HAS
DEVELOPED  A  NUMBER  OF  INNOVATIVE  MAIN  EXTENSION  POLICIES  THAT
HAVE  PERMITTED  IT  TO  EXTEND  ITS  SERVICE  TO  AN  INCREASING  NUMBER
OF  CUSTOMERS  IN  RURAL  AREAS  OF  MICHIGAN.

THE  AVAILABILITY  OF  SEMCO'S  POOL  OF  TECHNICAL,  MANAGERIAL,
FINANCIAL,  REGULATORY,  AND  ADMINISTRATIVE  GAS  UTILITY  RESOURCES
SHOULD  MAKE  IT  BETTER  QUALIFIED  TO  OWN  AND  OPERATE  ENSTAR/APLC
THAN  THE  CURRENT  OWNER.  RATEPAYERS  MAY  BE  ABLE  TO  REALIZE
POTENTIAL  BENEFITS  UNDER  SEMCO  OWNERSHIP  AND  MANAGEMENT  OF
ENSTAR/APLC  DUE  TO  ECONOMIES  OF  SCALE,  CONSOLIDATED  MANAGEMENT,
ADMINISTRATIVE  EFFICIENCIES,  TAX  SAVINGS,  POTENTIAL  REDUCTIONS  IN

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94    ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                           APPENDIX
PAGE  6  OF  10                                             PAGE  6  OF  10

<PAGE>
RATES  OF  RETURN  ON  PLANT  IN  SERVICE,  AND  OTHER  FACTORS  BECAUSE
SEMCO  IS  IN  THE  GAS  UTILITY  BUSINESS.

INHERENT  WITH  THE  TRANSFERS  ARE  CERTAIN  RISK  FACTORS  SUCH  AS  THE
COST  OF  IMPLEMENTING  THE  TRANSFERS;  UNCERTAINTIES  IN  INTEGRATING
BUSINESS  OPERATIONS  AND  OF  REALIZING  EXPECTED  SYNERGIES  AND  COST
SAVINGS;  RISKS  GENERALLY  ASSOCIATED  WITH  ACQUISITIONS  AND  THE
EXPANSION  OF  SEMCO'S  EXISTING  OPERATIONS;  AND  OTHER  RISKS
INHERENT  TO  THE  ENERGY  INDUSTRY.(8)  STAFF  BELIEVES  THESE  RISKS  ARE
ACCEPTABLE  IF  MITIGATED.  WITH  RESPECT  TO  THESE  RISKS,  THE
COMMISSION  NOTED  IN  ORDER  U-84-67(4)  DATED  APRIL  2,  1985,(9)
THAT  SEAGULL'S  CORE  BUSINESS  OF  OIL  EXPLORATION  AND  PRODUCTION  ARE,  BY
DEFINITION,  RISKIER  THAN  THE  UTILITY  BUSINESS  WHICH  COULD
INTRODUCE  PRESSURE  ON  THE  LATTER  FOR  RESOURCES  NECESSARY  TO
SUSTAIN  OR  EXPAND  AFFILIATED  OPERATIONS.  STAFF  BELIEVES  THAT  THE
TRANSFERS  ARE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST  AND  THAT  THEY  SHOULD  BE
APPROVED.

PURCHASE  AGREEMENT

THE  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT  FOR  THE  TRANSFERS  WAS  EXECUTED  ON  JULY  15,
1999,  AND  CLOSING  IS  SCHEDULED  TO  OCCUR  FIVE  DAYS  AFTER  ALL
CONDITIONS  TO  CLOSING  ARE  SATISFIED.  CLOSING  REQUIRES  HART-SCOTT-
RODINO  ANTITRUST  IMPROVEMENTS  ACT  OF  1976  APPROVAL  BY
FEDERAL  ANTITRUST  AUTHORITIES  (WHICH  WAS  OBTAINED  ON  SEPTEMBER  2,
1999)  AND  APPROVAL  OF  THE  COMMISSION.  SEMCO  WILL  PAY  OCEAN  A
CASH  PURCHASE  PRICE  OF  APPROXIMATELY  $290.2  MILLION.  THE
PURCHASE  PRICE  CONSISTS  OF  $70  MILLION  FOR  APLC'S  STOCK,  $161.5
MILLION  FOR  ENSTAR,  AND  THE  PRINCIPAL  AMOUNT  OF  APLC'S  DEBT  TO
OCEAN  AS  OF  THE  CLOSING  DATE  WHICH  IS  NOT  TO  EXCEED  $58.7  MILLION
(THE  AMOUNT  OF  THE  DEBT  AS  OF  MARCH  31,  1999).  THE  PURCHASE
PRICE  WILL  ALSO  INCLUDE  THE  INTEREST  ACCRUED  ON  APLC'S  DEBT.  THE
PURCHASE  PRICE  WILL  BE  ADJUSTED  TO  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE  AMOUNT  OF
WORKING  CAPITAL  HELD  BY  ENSTAR/APLC  AT  CLOSING,  IF  NEEDED.

THE  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT  CONTAINS  CUSTOMARY  PROVISIONS  FOR
TRANSACTIONS  OF  THIS  TYPE.  STAFF  REVIEWED  THE  SELLER'S  AND
PURCHASER'S  DISCLOSURE  SCHEDULES  REFERENCED  THEREIN  AND  DID  NOT
FIND  THESE  DOCUMENTS  TO  CONTAIN  ANYTHING  OF  CONCERN.  STAFF
BELIEVES  THAT  THE  TERMS  AND  CONDITIONS  OF  THE  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT

___________________
(8)IN  DOCKET  U-84-67 THE NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY IDENTIFIED ADDITIONAL RISKS
IN  THAT  PROCEEDING  INCLUDING  CONCERNS  THAT  THE  FINANCIAL  RESOURCES  OF
ENSTAR/APLC  COULD  BE USED TO FUND OTHER PARENT COMPANY VENTURES; ENSTAR/APLC'S
ONGOING  MAINTENANCE  COULD  BE DEFERRED TO PROVIDE CASH FOR THE PARENT COMPANY;
THE  PARENT  COMPANY COULD HINDER MANAGEMENT OF ENSTAR/APLC; RATEPAYERS COULD BE
MANIPULATED INTO PAYING FOR THE PARENT COMPANY'S ACQUISITION DEBT; AND COMBINING
ENSTAR/APLC WITH THE PARENT COULD ENDANGER ENSTAR/APLC'S FINANCIAL HEALTH. THESE
RISKS  ALSO  APPLY  TO  THE  SUBJECT  TRANSACTIONS.

(9)6  APUC  619

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94    ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                           APPENDIX
PAGE  7  OF  10                                             PAGE  7  OF  10

<PAGE>
AND  ITS  ATTACHMENTS  ARE  REASONABLE  AND  RECOMMENDS  IT  BE  FOUND
CONSISTENT  WITH  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST.


                  CONDITIONS

IF  THE  TRANSACTIONS  ARE  APPROVED,  SHOULD  CONDITIONS  OR
REQUIREMENTS  BE  IMPOSED  UPON  SEMCO  AND/OR  OCEAN?

CLOSING  OF  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT

IN  ORDER  TO  ENSURE  THE  COMMISSION  IS  KEPT  APPRISED  OF  THE  STATUS  OF
THE  TRANSACTIONS,  STAFF  RECOMMENDS  THAT  OCEAN/SEMCO  BE  REQUIRED  TO
NOTIFY  THE  COMMISSION  OF  THE  FINAL  CLOSING  DATE  OF  THE  PURCHASE
AGREEMENT  WITHIN  TEN  (10)  DAYS  THEREAFTER.  APPROVAL  OF  THE
APPLICATION  SHOULD  ALSO  BE  CONTINGENT  UPON  CLOSING  THE
TRANSACTIONS.

ACQUISITION  ADJUSTMENTS(10)

STAFF  HAS  ESTIMATED  THE  EXCESS  OF  PURCHASE  PRICE  OVER  NET  ASSETS  AS
APPROXIMATELY  $100  MILLION.  STAFF  BELIEVES  AS  42.05.441(B)
REQUIRES  THAT  THE  ORIGINAL  COST  OF  THE  ASSETS  SHOULD  BE  USED  IN
FUTURE  RATE  CASE  ANALYSES  RATHER  THAN  THE  COST  TO  SEMCO  BECAUSE  THE
ORIGINAL  COST  IS  LESS.  STAFF  RECOMMENDS  THAT  THE  COMMISSION  MAKE
IT  A  CONDITION  OF  APPROVAL  OF  THE  TRANSFERS  THAT  NO  ACQUISITION
ADJUSTMENT  WILL  BE  ALLOWED  IN  FUTURE  RATE  PROCEEDINGS  INVOLVING
ENSTAR/APLC  UNLESS  THE  COMMISSION  WERE  TO  APPROVE  A  SHOWING  THAT  IT
WOULD  BE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST.  STAFF  RECOMMENDS  THE  COMMISSION
NOTE  THAT  IT  MAY  CONSIDER  SEMCO'S  METHOD  OF  FINANCING  ANY  PURCHASE
PRICE  IN  EXCESS  OF  NET  ASSETS  (EQUITY)  ACQUIRED,  SHOULD  A  DOUBLE
LEVERAGE  ADJUSTMENT  TO  ENSTAR/APLC'S  RATE  OF  RETURN  ON  EQUITY  BE
DEEMED  APPROPRIATE  IN  FUTURE  RATE  CASES.

RATES

AS  POINTED  OUT  IN  MARATHON'S  COMMENTS,  ENSTAR/APLC  RATES  HAVE  NOT
BEEN  REVIEWED  FOR  15  YEARS.  MARATHON  INDICATED  THAT  A  RATE  CASE
IS  LONG  OVER  DUE.  STAFF  AGREES  A  RATE  CASE  IS  WARRANTED
IRRESPECTIVE  OF  THE  IMPACT  OF  THESE  TRANSACTIONS  AND  BELIEVES
THAT  SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  REQUIRED  TO  ADOPT  ENSTAR/APLC'S  EXISTING
RATES  ON  AN  INTERIM  BASIS,  AND  THAT  ENSTAR/APLC  BE  REQUIRED  TO
MAKE  A  FILING  IN  COMPLIANCE  WITH  3  AAC  48.275(A)  AND  3  AAC
48.275(H)  BY  JULY  1,  2000,  USING  FINANCIAL  DATA  FOR  THE  YEAR
1999.  THE  3  AAC  48.275(H)  COST  OF  SERVICE  STUDY  IS  NEEDED  TO
REFLECT  CHANGES  IN  THE  COMPOSITION  OF  CUSTOMER  CLASSES  THAT  MAY
HAVE  OCCURRED  OVER  THE  YEARS.  SINCE  THE  APPLICANTS  ASSERT  THAT
MINIMAL  CHANGES  ARE  ANTICIPATED  TO  ENSTAR/APLC'S  OPERATIONS  UNDER

____________________
(10)IN  ITS  RESPONSE  TO  MARATHON'S  COMMENTS  FILED  ON  SEPTEMBER  14, 1999,
ENSTAR/APLC  STATED  THAT  SEMCO  IS  NOT  REQUESTING AN ACQUISITION ADJUSTMENT.

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94    ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                           APPENDIX
PAGE  8  OF  10                                             PAGE  8  OF  10

<PAGE>
SEMCO  MANAGEMENT,  USING  1999  DATA  SHOULD  RESULT  IN  A  TEST  PERIOD
REASONABLY  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  EXPECTED  ONGOING  OPERATIONS  AND  WILL
PROVIDE  A  GOOD  BENCHMARK  FOR  MEASURING  ACTUAL  ADJUSTMENTS  UNDER
SEMCO  OWNERSHIP  AS  THEY  OCCUR  IN  THE  FUTURE.


CONDITIONS  REQUIRED  IN  ORDER  U-84-67(4)  (11)

WHEN  THE  COMMISSION  APPROVED  THE  TRANSFER  OF  ENSTAR/APLC  FROM  ITS
PREVIOUS  OWNER,  ENSTAR  CORPORATION,  TO  SEAGULL  IN  THE  ABOVE
REFERENCED  ORDER,  APPROVAL  WAS  SUBJECT  TO  SEVERAL  CONDITIONS.
BASED  UPON  ITS  REVIEW  OF  THOSE  CONDITIONS  STAFF  BELIEVES  THAT  THE
FOLLOWING  CONDITIONS  SHOULD  BE  CARRIED  THROUGH  TO  THESE
TRANSACTIONS:

- --   SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  REQUIRED  TO  CONTINUE  THE  ESTABLISHED  PRACTICE
OF  MAINTAINING  THE  ACCOUNT  AND  OPERATING  BOOKS  AND  RECORDS  OF
ENSTAR  AND  APLC  SEPARATE  FROM  EACH  OTHER  AND  FROM  THE  BOOKS  OF
SEMCO  AND  ITS  AFFILIATES.  THIS  WILL  PROVIDE  THE  ONGOING  DATA
BASE  NECESSARY  FOR  MONITORING  ALL  FACETS  OF  ENSTAR/APLC  AND
FOR  INVESTIGATING  ANY  MATTERS  WHICH  COME  TO  THE  COMMISSION'S
ATTENTION.

- --   SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  PROHIBITED  FROM  ENCUMBERING  ENSTAR/APLC'S
ASSETS  BY  USING  THEM  AS  COLLATERAL  FOR  FINANCING  NON-UTILITY
OR  NON-REGULATED  UTILITY  BUSINESS  ACTIVITIES.  THIS  WILL
ASSURE  THAT  NO  INDIRECT  WEAKENING  OF  ENSTAR/APLC'S  FINANCIAL
CONDITION  OCCURS  AND  WILL  MINIMIZE  THE  POTENTIAL  FOR
FORECLOSURE  ON  ITS  ASSETS.

- --   SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  PROHIBITED  FROM  SELLING  GAS  CURRENTLY  UNDER
CONTRACT  TO  ENSTAR/APLC  TO  ANOTHER  ENTITY  AND  CONTINUE  TO  BE
REQUIRED  TO  SUBMIT  FUTURE  GAS  SUPPLY  CONTRACTS  TO  THE
COMMISSION  FOR  APPROVAL.


                   TARIFF

SHOULD  ANY  ACTION  BE  TAKEN  WITH  RESPECT  TO  THE  ENSTAR/APLC  TARIFF
IF  THE  PROPOSED  TRANSFERS  ARE  APPROVED?

SEMCO  HAS  INDICATED  THAT  ENSTAR'S  CURRENT  TARIFF,  INCLUDING
RATES,  WILL  NOT  CHANGE  AS  A  RESULT  OF  THE  TRANSFERS.(12)  STAFF
RECOMMENDS  THAT  ENSTAR/APLC  BE  REQUIRED  TO  FILE  TARIFF  ADOPTION

__________________
(11)6  APUC  612

(12)APLC  DOES  NOT  MAINTAIN  A  TARIFF AT THE COMMISSION BECAUSE BOTH APLC AND
ENSTAR  ARE  REGULATED  AS  A SINGLE ENTITY. APLC'S RATES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED
INTO  ENSTAR'S  TARIFF.

STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94    ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                           APPENDIX
PAGE  9  OF  10                                             PAGE  9  OF  10

<PAGE>
NOTICE  REFLECTING  THE  CHANGE  IN  OWNERSHIP  OF  ENSTAR/APLC  FROM
OCEAN  TO  SEMCO  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH  3  AAC  48.400.  THE  ADOPTION
NOTICE  SHOULD  BE  FILED  NO  LATER  THAN  15  DAYS  AFTER  THE  PURCHASE
AGREEMENT  IS  CLOSED.  STAFF  ALSO  RECOMMENDS  THAT  ENSTAR/APLC  BE
REQUIRED  TO  FILE  A  COMPLETE  TARIFF  REFLECTING  THE  CHANGE  IN
OWNERSHIP  OF  ENSTAR  AND  APLC  FROM  OCEAN  TO  SEMCO.  ENSTAR/APLC
HAS  INFORMED  STAFF  THAT  THE  NEW  TARIFF  IS  NOW  FULLY  COMPUTERIZED,
AND  STAFF  THEREFORE  RECOMMENDS  THAT  IT  BE  FILED  NO  LATER  THAN  30
DAYS  AFTER  THE  DATE  THE  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT  IS  CLOSED.


                  CONCLUSION

STAFF  BELIEVES  THAT  SEMCO  IS  FIT,  WILLING,  AND  ABLE  TO  ASSUME
CONTROLLING  INTEREST  IN  ENSTAR  AND  APLC,  THAT  THE  PROPOSED
TRANSFERS  ARE  IN  THE  PUBLIC  INTEREST,  AND  THAT  THE  APPLICATIONS
SHOULD  BE  APPROVED  SUBJECT  TO  THE  CONDITIONS  DISCUSSED  ABOVE.
SEMCO  SHOULD  BE  ALLOWED  TO  ADOPT  ENSTAR/APLC'S  EXISTING  TARIFF  IN
ITS  ENTIRETY  AND  BE  REQUIRED  TO  FILE  AN  ADOPTION  NOTICE  FOR  THE
TARIFF  AS  REQUIRED  IN  3  AAC  48.400,  AND  FOLLOW  THE  REQUIREMENTS
OF  THAT  REGULATION.  THE  ADOPTION  NOTICE  SHOULD  BE  FILED  WITHIN
15  DAYS  AFTER  THE  DATE  OF  CLOSING  OF  THE  PURCHASE  AGREEMENT.
STAFF  ALSO  RECOMMENDS  THAT  ENSTAR  BE  REQUIRED  TO  FILE  A  COMPLETE
TARIFF  REFLECTING  THE  CHANGE  IN  OWNERSHIP  OF  ENSTAR  AND  APLC  FROM
OCEAN  TO  SEMCO  NO  LATER  THAN  30  DAYS  AFTER  THE  DATE  THE  PURCHASE
AGREEMENT  IS  CLOSED.





STAFF  RECOMMENDATION  -  U-99-93/U-99-94    ORDER  U-99-93(1)/U-99-94(1)
SEPTEMBER  22,  1999                                           APPENDIX
PAGE  10  OF  10                                           PAGE  10  OF  10



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission