SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement Commission Only (as permitted by
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to
Section 240 14a-11(c) or Section 240
14a-12
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
[DUKE ENERGY LOGO Duke Energy Corporation
APPEARS HERE] 526 South Church Street
P.O. Box 1244
Charlotte, NC 28201-1244
R.B. PRIORY
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 1999
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the annual shareholders meeting, which
will be held on Thursday, April 15, 1999, at 10 a.m. in the O. J. Miller
Auditorium in the Energy Center, 526 South Church Street, Charlotte, North
Carolina. This meeting will provide a good opportunity for us to report to you
our progress during 1998, as well as to outline for you our goals for 1999.
During the meeting, we will elect four Class II directors to three-year
terms expiring in 2002. Also, we will act upon a proposal to amend the
Corporation's Articles of Incorporation to increase the amount of authorized
Common Stock, act upon the ratification of the appointment of auditors, act
upon a shareholder proposal and transact any other business that may come
before the meeting. The accompanying proxy statement contains further
information about all of these matters.
The Board of Directors and I hope you can attend the meeting, and look
forward to seeing you. Whether or not you expect to attend, please sign and
date the enclosed form of proxy and return it promptly in the accompanying
envelope to ensure that your shares will be represented. If you attend the
meeting, you may withdraw any previously given and vote your shares in person.
Sincerely,
/s/ R.B. PRIORY
--------------------------
<PAGE>
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
526 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
P.O. BOX 1244
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28201-1244
NOTICE OF 1999 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
March 12, 1999
To the Holders of Common Stock of
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of shareholders of Duke
Energy Corporation (the "Corporation") will be held in O. J. Miller Auditorium
in the Energy Center, 526 South Church Street, Charlotte, North Carolina, on
Thursday, April 15, 1999, at 10 a.m., for the following purposes:
(1) to elect four directors to Class II of the Board of Directors;
(2) to act upon a proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation to
increase the amount of authorized Common Stock from 500,000,000 to
1,000,000,000;
(3) to ratify the appointment of auditors;
(4) to act upon a shareholder proposal; and
(5) to transact such other business as may come before the meeting.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 22,
1999 as the record date for the meeting.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting regardless
of the number of shares you may hold. Please complete, sign and date the
enclosed form of proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope which
requires no postage if mailed within the United States.
By Order of the Board of Directors
RICHARD W. BLACKBURN
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY
<PAGE>
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement, with the accompanying proxy card, is first being
mailed to holders of Common Stock on or about March 12, 1999 and is furnished
in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation to be used at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on
April 15, 1999.
PROXIES; REVOCATION OF PROXIES
The accompanying form of proxy may be used by a holder of Common Stock
whether or not such holder attends the meeting in person. The proxy may be
revoked by such holder at any time prior to its use at the meeting. There is no
specific procedure or requirement under the Corporation's Articles of
Incorporation, By-Laws or North Carolina law with respect to how proxies may be
revoked. All shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this
solicitation, and not revoked before such proxies are exercised, will be voted
in the manner specified therein. If no directions are given, the proxies will
be voted FOR the proposed slate of directors (Proposal 1); FOR the proposal to
amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the amount of authorized Common
Stock (Proposal 2); FOR the ratification of the appointment of auditors
(Proposal 3); AGAINST the shareholder proposal (Proposal 4); and AT THE
DISCRETION OF THE PERSONS NAMED IN SUCH PROXIES ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY
COME BEFORE THE MEETING.
COST OF PROXY SOLICITATION
The entire cost of soliciting the proxies from holders of Common Stock
will be borne by the Corporation. In addition to the solicitation of the
proxies by mail, the Corporation will request banks, brokers and other record
holders to send proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of Common
Stock and secure their voting instructions. The Corporation will reimburse such
record holders for their reasonable expenses in so doing. The Corporation has
also made arrangements with Georgeson & Company, Inc. to assist it in
soliciting proxies and has agreed to pay $17,500 plus expenses for such
services. If necessary, the Corporation may also use several of its officers
and regular employees, who will not be specially compensated, to solicit
proxies from holders of Common Stock, either personally or by telephone,
telegram, facsimile or special delivery letter or by other means.
RECORD DATE; QUORUM; VOTING RIGHTS
The Board of Directors has fixed February 22, 1999, as the record date
(the "Record Date") for determination of holders of Common Stock entitled to
notice of and to vote at the meeting. Accordingly, only holders of record of
Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to
notice of and to vote at the meeting. The number of outstanding shares of
Common Stock entitled to vote at the meeting is . In order to establish a
quorum for the meeting, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast must be
either present in person or represented by valid proxy. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists
at the meeting.
Each share of Common Stock entitled to vote at the meeting entitles its
holder to one vote. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast
by the holders of Common Stock entitled to vote at the meeting. "Plurality"
means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast are
elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the
meeting. Approval by a majority of the votes cast by holders of Common Stock
entitled to vote at the meeting is required to approve Proposals 2, 3 and 4.
Any shares not voted, whether by abstention or broker non-vote, will not be
counted as votes cast for purposes of determining whether Proposals 2, 3 and 4
have received sufficient votes for approval, nor will any abstentions or broker
non-votes be counted in the election of directors.
MULTIPLE COPIES OF ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
The Corporation's Annual Report to Shareholders has been mailed to all
shareholders. The Annual Report is not to be regarded as proxy soliciting
material. If more than one copy of the Annual Report is sent to your address
and you wish to reduce the number of Annual Reports you receive and save the
Corporation the cost of producing and mailing duplicate reports, the
Corporation will discontinue the mailing of those reports if you mark the
appropriate box on each proxy card for which you do not wish to receive an
Annual Report. Mailing of dividends, dividend reinvestment and stock purchase
statements, proxy materials and special notices will not be affected by your
election to discontinue duplicate mailings of the Annual Report.
<PAGE>
At least one account must continue to receive an Annual Report. To
discontinue or resume the mailing of an Annual Report to an account,
shareholders of record may also call the Investor Relations Department at (800)
488-3853.
If you own Common Stock through a bank, broker or other nominee and
receive more than one Annual Report, contact the holder of record to eliminate
duplicate mailings.
ADVANCE NOTICE PROCEDURES
Under the Corporation's By-Laws, nominations for director may be made only
by the Board of Directors or by a shareholder entitled to vote who has
delivered notice to the Corporation not less than 90 nor more than 120 days
prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting. For the
annual meeting of shareholders in the year 2000, the Corporation must receive
this notice on or after December 17, 1999, and on or before January 16, 2000.
The Corporation's By-Laws also provide that no business may be brought
before an annual meeting except as specified in the notice of the meeting or as
otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of
Directors or by a shareholder entitled to vote who has delivered notice to the
Corporation (containing certain information specified in the By-Laws) within
the time limits described above for delivering notice of a nomination for the
election of a director. These requirements apply to any matter that a
shareholder wishes to raise at an annual meeting other than pursuant to the
procedures under Rule 14a-8 of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
A copy of the full text of the By-Law provisions discussed above may be
obtained by writing to the Secretary of the Corporation, Post Office Box 1244,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1244.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(PROPOSAL 1)
The Corporation's Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board of
Directors is to be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in size as
possible. Each year the directors of one class are elected to serve terms of
three years.
Four persons have been nominated by the Board of Directors for election as
directors to Class II at the meeting, to serve three-year terms and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. The Class II nominees are G. Alex
Bernhardt, Sr., William A. Coley, Max Lennon and Leo E. Linbeck, Jr. All of the
Class II nominees are currently Class II directors.
Votes (other than votes withheld) will be cast pursuant to the
accompanying proxy for the election of the nominees listed unless, by reason of
death or other unexpected occurrence, one or more of such nominees will not be
available for election. In that event, it is intended that such votes will be
cast for such substitute nominee or nominees as may be determined by the
persons named in such proxy. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe
that any of the nominees listed will not be available for election as a
director.
2
<PAGE>
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS
CLASS II DIRECTORS
(TERM EXPIRING IN 2002)
G. ALEX BERNHARDT, SR., CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
BERNHARDT FURNITURE COMPANY, FURNITURE MANUFACTURER
Photo Mr. Bernhardt, 55, was elected a director in 1991. He is Chairman of
Appears the Corporate Performance Review Committee and serves on the Finance
Here Committee. He has been associated with Bernhardt Furniture Company
of Lenoir, North Carolina, since 1965. He was named President and a
director in 1976 and became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in
1996. He is a director of Robert Talbott, Inc. and First Union
Corporation. He serves as a trustee of Davidson College and a member
of the North Carolina Governor's Business Council. He is a director
emeritus and past President of the American Furniture Manufacturers
Association.
WILLIAM A. COLEY, GROUP PRESIDENT, DUKE POWER, ELECTRIC OPERATIONS OF
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
Photo Mr. Coley, 55, joined the Corporation in 1966 and was elected a
Appears director in 1990. He was named Vice President, Operation, in 1984;
Here Vice President, Central Division, in 1986; Senior Vice President,
Power Delivery, in 1988; Senior Vice President, Customer Group, in
1990; Executive Vice President, Customer Group, in 1991; President,
Associated Enterprises Group, in 1994 and was appointed to his
present position in June 1997. He serves on the Management
Committee. He is a director of Carolina Pad and Paper Company and
the North Carolina Board of SouthTrust Bank. He also serves on the
Boards of Trustees of the Lynnwood Foundation, Queens College, Union
Theological Seminary, Presbyterian Healthcare Systems, United Way of
the Central Carolinas and the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce and is
on the Institutional Advisory Board and the Engineering Advisory
Board of the Georgia Institute of Technology.
MAX LENNON, PRESIDENT, MARS HILL COLLEGE, MARS HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
Photo Dr. Lennon, 58, was elected a director in 1988. He is Chairman of
Appears the Audit Committee and also serves on the Corporate Governance
Here Committee. He assumed his present position as President of Mars Hill
College in 1996, after serving as President of Eastern Foods, Inc.
from 1994 through 1995. He was previously involved in higher
education from 1966 to 1994, his last tenure being at Clemson
University where he served as President for eight years. He is a
director of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc.
LEO E. LINBECK, JR., CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
LINBECK CORPORATION, HOLDING COMPANY OF FOUR CONSTRUCTION-RELATED
FIRMS
Photo Mr. Linbeck, 64, was appointed a director in June 1997 upon the
Appears merger of the Corporation and PanEnergy. He had been a director of
Here PanEnergy since 1986. He is Chairman of the Compensation Committee
and serves on the Audit Committee. He assumed his present position
with Linbeck Corporation in 1990 after serving as Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Linbeck Construction
Corporation from 1975 to 1990. He serves as a director of Daniel
Industries, Inc. and as a director and trustee of 33 investment
companies managed by John Hancock Advisers, Inc.
3
<PAGE>
ROBERT J. BROWN, CHAIRMAN AND PRESIDENT, B&C ASSOCIATES, INC.,
MARKETING RESEARCH AND PUBLIC RELATIONS FIRM
Photo Mr. Brown, 64, was elected a director in 1994 and serves on the
Appears Audit and Corporate Performance Review Committees. He founded B&C
Here Associates, Inc., High Point, North Carolina, in 1960, served as its
President from 1960 until 1968 and has been its Chairman and
President since 1973. From 1968 until 1973, Mr. Brown was a Special
Assistant to the President of the United States, with oversight
responsibility for community relations, civil rights, emergency
preparedness and day care. He is a director of First Union
Corporation, Sonoco Products Company, Republic Industries, Inc. and
North Carolina Citizens for Business and Industry. He is a Class III
director with a term expiring in 2000.
ANN MAYNARD GRAY, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT, ABC, INC. AND FORMER
PRESIDENT, DIVERSIFIED PUBLISHING GROUP OF ABC, INC., TELEVISION,
RADIO AND PUBLISHING
Photo Ms. Gray, 53, was appointed a director in June 1997 upon the merger
Appears of the Corporation and PanEnergy. She had been a director of
Here PanEnergy since 1994. She serves on the Audit and Corporate
Performance Review Committees. She was President, Diversified
Publishing Group of ABC, Inc. from 1991 until 1997, and was a
Corporate Vice President of ABC, Inc. and its predecessors from 1979
to 1998. She is a director of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company. She is a
Class I director with a term expiring in 2001.
WILLIAM T. ESREY, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SPRINT
CORPORATION, A DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY
Photo Mr. Esrey, 59, was appointed a director in June 1997 upon the merger
Appears of the Corporation and PanEnergy. He had been a director of
Here PanEnergy since 1985. He serves on the Compensation and Corporate
Governance Committees. He has served as Chairman of Sprint
Corporation since 1990 and as its Chief Executive Officer since
1985. He was President of Sprint Corporation from 1985 to 1996. He
is a director of Sprint Corporation, General Mills, Inc., Everen
Capital Corporation, Exxon Corporation and Earthlink Network, Inc.
He is a Class III director with a term expiring in 2000.
DENNIS R. HENDRIX, RETIRED CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PANENERGY CORP
Photo Mr. Hendrix, 59, was appointed a director in June 1997 upon the
Appears merger of the Corporation and PanEnergy. He had been a director of
Here PanEnergy since 1990. He serves on the Corporate Performance Review
and Corporate Governance Committees. He was Chairman of the Board of
PanEnergy from 1990 to 1997; Chief Executive Officer of PanEnergy
from 1990 to 1995; and President of PanEnergy from 1990 to 1993. He
served as a director of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company ("PEPL")
and Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation ("TETCO") from 1990 to
1997; Chairman of the Board of PEPL and TETCO from 1990 to 1994 and
President of TETCO from 1990 to 1994. He is a director of Allied
Waste Industries, Inc., National Power, PLC, Newfield Exploration
Company and Pool Energy Services Co. He is a Class I director with a
term expiring in 2001.
4
<PAGE>
HAROLD S. HOOK, CONSULTANT, RETIRED CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF AMERICAN GENERAL CORPORATION, DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL
SERVICES
Photo Mr. Hook, 67, was appointed a director in June 1997 upon the merger
Appears of the Corporation and PanEnergy. He had been a director of
Here PanEnergy since 1978. He serves on the Corporate Performance Review
and Finance Committees. Mr. Hook retired from American General
Corporation in 1997 after more than 18 years as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. He serves as a director of Chase Manhattan
Corporation, The Chase Manhattan Bank, Cooper Industries, Inc. and
Sprint Corporation. He is a Class I director with a term expiring in
2001.
GEORGE DEAN JOHNSON, JR., PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, DEVELOPMENT, OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT OF
EXTENDED-STAY LODGING FACILITIES
Photo Mr. Johnson, 56, was elected a director in 1986. He is Chairman of
Appears the Finance Committee and also serves on the Compensation Committee.
Here Mr. Johnson began his legal career in 1967 when he joined Johnson,
Smith, Hibbard and Wildman as an attorney. He was General Partner of
WJB Video, a Blockbuster Video franchisee, from 1987 to 1993, and
served as President of the Domestic Consumer Division of Blockbuster
Entertainment Corporation from 1993 until 1995. He was a co-founder
of Extended Stay America and has served as its President and Chief
Executive Officer since 1995. He is Chairman of Johnson Development
Associates, Inc. and is a director of Florida Panthers Holdings,
Inc., Extended Stay America and Republic Industries, Inc. He also
serves on the Board of Trustees of Converse College. He is a Class
III director with a term expiring in 2000.
JAMES G. MARTIN, PH.D., VICE PRESIDENT, RESEARCH, CAROLINAS
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
Photo Mr. Martin, 63, was elected a director in 1994. He is Chairman of
Appears the Corporate Governance Committee and also serves on the
Here Compensation Committee. Since January 1993, he has been Chairman of
the Research Development Board of the Carolinas HealthCare System
located at Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina. He
was named to his present position in 1995. He served as Governor of
the State of North Carolina from 1985 to 1993 and was a member of
the United States House of Representatives, representing the Ninth
District of North Carolina, from 1973 to 1984. Mr. Martin is
currently a director of J. A. Jones, Inc., Palomar Medical
Technologies, Inc., Entropy, Inc., Reprogenesis, Inc. and Family
Dollar Stores, Inc. He is Chairman of the Global TransPark
Foundation, Inc. and a Trustee of Davidson College, where he was on
the Chemistry Department faculty from 1960 to 1972. He is a Class
III director with a term expiring in 2000.
RICHARD B. PRIORY, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
Photo Mr. Priory, 52, became Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Appears Officer in June 1997 upon the merger of the Corporation and
Here PanEnergy, and became President in November 1998. He was elected a
director in 1990. He joined the Corporation in 1976 as a Design
Engineer; was named Vice President, Design Engineering, in 1984;
Senior Vice President, Generation and Information Services, in 1988;
Executive Vice President, Power Generation Group, in 1991 and
President and Chief Operating Officer in 1994. He is Chairman of the
Management Committee and serves on the Finance and Corporate
Governance Committees. He is a director of Dana Corporation and J.
A. Jones Applied Research Corp. He serves on the boards of the
Edison Electric Institute, the Association of Edison Illuminating
Companies and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. He is a
member of The National Petroleum Council and The Business
Roundtable. Mr. Priory is also a member of the National Academy of
Engineering. He is a Class III director with a term expiring in
2000.
5
<PAGE>
RUSSELL M. ROBINSON, II, ATTORNEY, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A.
Photo Mr. Robinson, 67, was elected a director in 1995 and serves on the
Appears Audit and Corporate Performance Review Committees. He has been
Here engaged in the practice of law since 1956, and is the author of
ROBINSON ON NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION LAW. He is a director of
Cadmus Communications Corporation and Caraustar Industries, Inc. and
also serves as a member of the American Law Institute and a Fellow
of the American Bar Foundation. He is a member of the Board of
Visitors of Duke University Law School, a trustee of The Duke
Endowment and Chairman of The Foundation of the University of North
Carolina at Charlotte, Inc. He is a Class I director with a term
expiring in 2001.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF NOMINEES, DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The table below sets forth the beneficial ownership of Common Stock by
each director, each nominee for director, each executive officer whose name
appears in the Summary Compensation Table below ("Named Executive Officer") and
by directors and executive officers of the Corporation as a group, as of
December 31, 1998. In addition to the Common Stock, the Corporation also has
outstanding nine series of Preferred Stock and four series of Preferred Stock
A. As of December 31, 1998, no director, nominee for director or executive
officer of the Corporation was the beneficial owner of any shares of the
Corporation's Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock A.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES BENEFICIALLY RIGHT TO TOTAL SHARES
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR IDENTITY OF GROUP OWNED (1) ACQUIRE (2) BENEFICIALLY OWNED
- -------------------------------------------------- --------------------- ----------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Paul M. Anderson(3)............................ 215,133 106,800 321,933
G. Alex Bernhardt, Sr.(4)...................... 5,968 5,968
Richard W. Blackburn(3)........................ 4,035 4,035
Robert J. Brown(4)............................. 2,732 2,732
William A. Coley .............................. 19,750 19,750
William T. Esrey(4)............................ 6,151 13,574 19,725
Fred J. Fowler(3).............................. 34,402 54,304 88,706
Ann Maynard Gray(4)............................ 3,603 8,354 11,957
Dennis R. Hendrix(4)........................... 237,605 237,605
Harold S. Hook(4).............................. 11,693 5,220 16,913
George Dean Johnson, Jr.(4,6).................. 8,805 8,805
Max Lennon (4)................................. 6,123 6,123
Leo E. Linbeck, Jr.(4)......................... 5,942 13,574 19,516
James G. Martin(4)............................. 3,115 3,115
Richard J. Osborne(3).......................... 7,586 7,586
Richard B. Priory(3)........................... 12,138 12,138
Russell M. Robinson, II(4,7)................... 8,909,725 8,909,725
Directors and executive officers as a group
(19 persons)(3,4,5,6,7)....................... 9,498,812 204,046 9,702,858
</TABLE>
- ---------
1. Individuals may disclaim beneficial ownership of certain shares, as
indicated in a footnote. Unless otherwise indicated in a footnote, the
named individual or family member possesses sole voting power and sole
investment power with respect to shares of Common Stock shown as
beneficially owned by such person.
2. Represents shares which the individual has a right to acquire within 60 days
after December 31, 1998 through exercise of stock options.
3. Includes full shares allocated to the participant's accounts under employee
benefit plans as of December 31, 1998.
4. Includes full shares held in trust under the arrangement for directors
described under the caption "Compensation of Directors."
5. Includes 1,411 shares owned by Mr. Coley's wife. Beneficial ownership of
such shares is disclaimed.
6. Includes 2,609 shares held in a limited partnership controlled by Mr.
Johnson.
7. Includes 7,604,721 shares owned by The Duke Endowment and 1,302,132 shares
owned by the Doris Duke Trust. Mr. Robinson, who is a trustee of each of
such entities, with shared voting and investment power, expressly disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by such trusts.
6
<PAGE>
No person listed in the table beneficially owned more than 1% of the
Common Stock outstanding on December 31, 1998, with the exception of Russell M.
Robinson, II, who beneficially owned 8,909,725 shares of such stock on that
date largely because of the attribution to him of 7,604,721 shares owned by The
Duke Endowment and 1,302,132 shares owned by the Doris Duke Trust, shares he is
deemed to beneficially own in his capacities as a trustee of The Duke Endowment
and a trustee of the Doris Duke Trust, respectively. The directors and
executive officers as a group beneficially owned less than 1% of such stock
(not including the shares owned by such trusts) on that date.
The following table shows the number of units of limited partnership
interests in TEPPCO Partners, L.P., a publicly traded master limited
partnership of which Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation, is the general partner, which were
beneficially owned on December 31, 1998 by a director or nominee for director
of the Corporation, a Named Executive Officer, and by the directors and
executive officers of the Corporation as a group. None of such persons had the
right to acquire units within 60 days after December 31, 1998. As of December
31, 1998, the number of units beneficially owned by directors and executive
officers of the Corporation as a group did not exceed 1% of the then
outstanding units.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR UNITS BENEFICIALLY
IDENTITY OF GROUP OWNED
- ----------------------------------------------- -------------------
<S> <C>
Paul M. Anderson 4,000
Dennis R. Hendrix 29,000
Harold S. Hook 4,000
Richard J. Osborne 1,000
Directors and executive officers as a group 38,900
</TABLE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Set forth below is information regarding compensation to the Chief
Executive Officer, the other four most highly compensated executive officers of
the Corporation who were serving as executive officers at the end of 1998, and
one additional individual (Paul M. Anderson) for whom disclosure would have
been required as one of those executive officers but for the fact that he was
not serving as an executive officer at the end of 1998, for services to the
Corporation for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
------------------------------------------
OTHER ANNUAL
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) COMPENSATION($)
- ----------------------------------- ------ ------------ ----------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R. B. Priory 1998 810,000 891,000 34,011
Chairman of the Board, President 1997 671,933 297,339 59,652
and Chief Executive Officer 1996 476,509 107,215 14,144
P. M. Anderson (1) 1998 612,500 551,280 19,932
President and 1997 373,864 225,000 5,257
Chief Operating Officer
W. A. Coley 1998 380,676 159,884 16,941
Group President 1997 387,392 190,407 14,302
Duke Power Company 1996 378,947 300,723 43,734
F. J. Fowler (2) 1998 360,000 237,600 2,131
Group President 1997 190,227 185,040
Energy Transmission
R. W. Blackburn (3) 1998 360,000 237,600 2,123
Executive Vice President, 1997 53,077
General Counsel & Secretary
R. J. Osborne 1998 324,000 213,840 9,987
Executive Vice President 1997 299,322 72,085 36,284
and Chief Financial Officer 1996 253,200 47,931 3,448
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM COMPENSATION
-----------------------------------------------
AWARDS PAYOUTS
---------------------------------- ------------
RESTRICTED SECURITIES
STOCK UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION AWARD(S) ($) (4) OPTIONS/SARS(#) PAYOUTS($) COMPENSATION($) (5)
- ----------------------------------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------ --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R. B. Priory 500,000 1,034,203
Chairman of the Board, President 397,013 99,165
and Chief Executive Officer 124,362 31,254
P. M. Anderson (1) 400,000 1,254,052
President and 698,475
Chief Operating Officer
W. A. Coley 200,000 221,245
Group President 281,959 95,180
Duke Power Company 124,362 53,594
F. J. Fowler (2) 200,000 47,056
Group President 27,665
Energy Transmission
R. W. Blackburn (3) 165,750 150,000 73,166
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary
R. J. Osborne 100,000 168,907
Executive Vice President 171,774 32,516
and Chief Financial Officer 61,272 15,932
</TABLE>
- ---------
1. Mr. Anderson resigned as President and Chief Operating Officer on November
15, 1998. Compensation amounts shown for Mr. Anderson for 1997 relate to
the period from June 18, 1997 to December 31, 1997.
2. Compensation amounts shown for Mr. Fowler for 1997 relate to the period from
June 18, 1997 to December 31, 1997.
7
<PAGE>
3. Mr. Blackburn joined the Corporation on November 10, 1997. Compensation
amounts shown for Mr. Blackburn for 1997 relate to the period from November
10, 1997 to December 31, 1997.
4. Mr. Blackburn's aggregate restricted stock holdings at December 31, 1998,
were 3,000 shares with a value on that date of $192,188. Dividends are paid
on such shares. One-third of the restricted stock award to Mr. Blackburn
(1,000 shares) vested on January 4, 1999. The remainder vests in two
additional installments of 1,000 shares each on January 3, 2000 and January
2, 2001. No other Named Executive Officer held restricted stock on December
31, 1998.
5. All Other Compensation Column includes the following for 1998:
a. Matching contributions under the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan as
follows: R. B. Priory, $8,333; W. A. Coley, $7,990; R. J. Osborne,
$7,200; R. W. Blackburn, $2,138.
b. Matching contribution credits under a make-whole arrangement under the
Duke Energy Corporation Executive Savings Plan designed to maintain the
overall integrity of employee benefit plans as follows: R. B. Priory,
$77,457; W. A. Coley, $27,789; R. J. Osborne, $15,970; R. W. Blackburn,
$9,108.
c. Matching contributions under the Employees' Savings Plan of PanEnergy
Corp and Participating Affiliates as follows: P. M. Anderson, $10,560;
F. J. Fowler, $10,560.
d. Matching contribution credits under a make-whole arrangement under the
PanEnergy Corp Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan designed to
maintain the overall integrity of employee benefit plans as follows: P.
M. Anderson, $95,936; F. J. Fowler, $25,413.
e. Above-market interest earned on account balances in the Duke Energy
Corporation Executive Savings Plan, Supplemental Account as follows: R.
B. Priory, $8,132; W. A. Coley, $10,805; R. J. Osborne, $3,656; R. W.
Blackburn, $ 0.
f. Above-market interest earned on account balances in the PanEnergy Corp
Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: P. M. Anderson,
$8,558; F. J. Fowler, $16.
g. Economic value of life insurance coverage provided under life insurance
plans as follows: R. B. Priory, $16,323; P. M. Anderson, $3,276;
W. A. Coley, $6,408; F. J. Fowler, $8,006; R. J. Osborne, $2,081;
R. W. Blackburn, $ 0.
h. The cost to the Corporation of supplemental life insurance coverage
under the Supplemental Insurance Plan as follows: R. B. Priory, $10,851;
W. A. Coley, $3,997; R. J. Osborne, $0; R. W. Blackburn, $ 0.
i. The economic benefit of split-dollar life insurance coverage pursuant
to the Estate Conservation Plan as follows: R. B. Priory, $289; W. A.
Coley, $347; R. J. Osborne, $0; R. W. Blackburn, $ 0.
j. Pursuant to the employment agreement with P. M. Anderson described in
"Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control Arrangements" below, $83,334 in deferred compensation
is accrued monthly for a two-year period beginning in June 1997. In
1998, $1,000,008 was deferred under such agreement.
k. Cash payments to certain key employees whose incentives were not
adjusted to market-competitive levels between June 18, 1997 and December
31, 1997 to reflect significant changes in responsibilities as follows:
R. B. Priory, $910,000; W. A. Coley, $162,000; R. J. Osborne, $140,000.
See "Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation -- Other
Compensation."
8
<PAGE>
1998 OPTION GRANTS
The following table sets forth options granted to the Named Executive
Officers during 1998, along with the present value of such options on the date
they were granted, calculated as described in the footnote to the table.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GRANT DATE
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS VALUE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
NUMBER
OF SHARES % OF TOTAL EXERCISE
UNDERLYING OPTIONS/SARS OR BASE GRANT DATE
OPTIONS/SARS GRANTED TO PRICE EXPIRATION PRESENT
NAME GRANTED (1) (#) EMPLOYEES ($/SH) DATE VALUE (2) ($)
- ------------------------ --------------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Richard B. Priory 500,000 14.1 58.9375 04/16/2008 4,495,000
Paul M. Anderson 400,000 11.3 58.9375 04/16/2008 3,596,000
William A. Coley 200,000 5.6 58.9375 04/16/2008 1,798,000
Fred J. Fowler 200,000 5.6 58.9375 04/16/2008 1,798,000
Richard W. Blackburn 150,000 4.2 58.9375 04/16/2008 1,348,500
Richard J. Osborne 100,000 2.8 58.9375 04/16/2008 899,000
</TABLE>
- ---------
1. The Corporation has not granted any SARs to the Named Executive Officers or
any other persons.
2. Based on the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The key input variables
used in valuing the options were: risk-free interest rate, 5.8%; dividend
yield, 4.23%; stock price volatility, .151; option term, ten years. The
volatility variable reflected weekly stock price trading data from June 18,
1997 (the effective date of the merger between the Corporation and
PanEnergy Corp) through April 16, 1998 (the option grant date). An
adjustment was made for risk of forfeiture during the vesting period. The
actual value, if any, that a grantee may realize will depend on the excess
of the stock price over the exercise price on the date the option is
exercised, so that there is no assurance the value realized will be at or
near the value estimated by the Black-Scholes model.
EXERCISES OF STOCK OPTIONS IN 1998 AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table shows aggregate exercises of options during 1998 by
the Named Executive Officers, and the aggregate year-end value of the
unexercised options held by them. The value assigned to each unexercised,
"in-the-money" stock option is based on the positive spread between the
exercise price of such stock option and the fair market value ("FMV") of the
Common Stock on December 31, 1998, which was $64.25. The FMV is the average of
the high and low prices of a share of Common Stock on that date as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Tape. The ultimate value of
a stock option will be dependent on the market value of the underlying shares
on a future date.
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
OPTIONS/SARS AT OPTIONS/SARS AT
FY-END (1) (#) FY-END ($)
----------------- ---------------------
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME EXERCISE (#) VALUE REALIZED ($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------------ -------------- -------------------- ----------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Richard B. Priory -- -- 0/500,000 0/2,656,250
Paul M. Anderson 253,394 8,594,366 106,800/0 4,682,486/0
William A. Coley -- -- 0/200,000 0/1,062,500
Fred J. Fowler 5,495 209,144 50,823/206,963 2,063,239/1,202,358
Richard W. Blackburn -- -- 0/150,000 0/796,875
Richard J. Osborne -- -- 0/100,000 0/531,250
</TABLE>
---------
1. The Corporation has not granted any SARs to the Named Executive Officers
or any other persons.
Note: Future exercisability of currently unexercisable stock options
depends on the grantee remaining employed by the Corporation throughout
the vesting period of the options, subject to provisions applicable at
retirement, death or total disability. As of December 31, 1998, the Named
Executive Officers' unexercisable
9
<PAGE>
options vest and become exercisable on the following schedule, although
all unvested options will fully vest and become exercisable upon a
change-in-control (as defined in the applicable option agreement) of the
Corporation.
UNEXERCISABLE OPTIONS HELD BY:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VESTING DATE R. B. PRIORY W. A. COLEY F. J. FOWLER R. W. BLACKBURN R. J. OSBORNE
- -------------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ----------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
January 22, 1999 0 0 3,481 0 0
April 16, 1999 100,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 20,000
January 22, 2000 0 0 3,482 0 0
April 16, 2000 100,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 20,000
April 16, 2001 100,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 20,000
April 16, 2002 100,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 20,000
April 16, 2003 100,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 20,000
</TABLE>
RETIREMENT PLAN INFORMATION
Executive officers and other employees of the Corporation participate in
either of two noncontributory, qualified, defined benefit retirement plans: the
Retirement Cash Balance Plan and the Retirement Income Plan. The Retirement
Income Plan ceased admitting new participants after December 31, 1998. In
addition, selected managers are eligible to participate in the Executive Cash
Balance Plan, which is a noncontributory, nonqualified, defined benefit
retirement plan. A portion of the benefits earned in the Executive Cash Balance
Plan is attributable to compensation in excess of the Internal Revenue Service
annual compensation limit ($160,000 for 1998) and deferred compensation, as
well as reductions caused by maximum benefit limitations that apply to
qualified plans from the benefits that would otherwise be provided under the
Retirement Cash Balance Plan and the Retirement Income Plan. Benefits under the
Retirement Cash Balance Plan, the Retirement Income Plan and the Executive Cash
Balance Plan are based on eligible pay, generally consisting of base pay,
short-term incentives and lump-sum merit increases. The Retirement Cash Balance
Plan and the Retirement Income Plan exclude deferred compensation, other than
deferrals pursuant to Sections 401(k) and 125 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Under a new benefit accrual formula that applies in determining benefits
under the Retirement Cash Balance Plan on and after January 1, 1997, and under
the Retirement Income Plan on and after January 1, 1999, an eligible employee's
plan account receives a pay credit at the end of each month in which the
employee remains eligible and receives eligible pay for services. The monthly
pay credit is equal to a percentage of the employee's monthly eligible pay. The
percentage depends on age and completed years of service at the beginning of
the year, as shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MONTHLY PAY CREDIT
AGE AND SERVICE PERCENTAGE
- ---------------------- -------------------
<S> <C>
34 or less ......... 4%
35 to 49 ........... 5%
50 to 64 ........... 6%
65 or more ......... 7%
</TABLE>
In addition, the employee receives a monthly allocation of 4% for any
portion of eligible pay above the Social Security taxable wage base ($72,600
for 1999). However, for certain other employees of the Corporation, the
percentage is a flat 3% of eligible pay. Employee accounts also receive monthly
interest credits on their balances. The rate of the interest credit is adjusted
quarterly and equals the yield on 30-year U.S. Treasury Bonds during the third
week of the last month of the previous quarter, subject to a minimum rate of 4%
per year and a maximum rate of 9% per year.
Prior to application of the new benefit accrual formula, benefits for
eligible employees, including benefits under the Retirement Income Plan for
1998, were determined under other formulas. To transition from a prior formula
to the new formula, an eligible employee's accrued benefit earned under the
prior formula is preserved as a minimum, and the employee's account under the
new benefit accrual formula receives an opening balance derived from a variety
of factors. In addition, during 1998, Messrs. Priory, Coley, Osborne and
Blackburn were awarded one-time supplemental credits to their Executive Cash
Balance Plan accounts of $337,100; $102,800; $137,062; and $89,075,
respectively.
Assuming that the Named Executive Officers continue in their present
positions at their present salaries until retirement at age 65, their estimated
annual pensions in a single life annuity form under the applicable plan
attributable to such salaries would be: Richard B. Priory, $666,438; William A.
Coley, $255,114; Fred J. Fowler, $294,231; Richard W. Blackburn, $37,231; and
Richard J. Osborne, $196,147. Such estimates are calculated assuming interest
credits at a rate of 7% per
10
<PAGE>
annum and using a future Social Security taxable wage base equal to $72,600. As
described under "Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control Arrangements," Mr. Anderson's employment agreement provided
that, upon a termination prior to early retirement age of (55), he would
receive retirement benefits as if he had reached such age. As a result, Mr.
Anderson received a lump sum distribution of $3,434,743, exceeding by $244,356
the retirement benefit otherwise payable to him.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is currently
comprised of William T. Esrey, George Dean Johnson, Jr., Leo E. Linbeck, Jr.
and James G. Martin. None of the present or former members of the Compensation
Committee was at any time during 1998 or at any other time an officer or
employee of the Corporation.
No executive officer of the Corporation serves as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity which has one or more
executive officers serving as a member of the Corporation's Board of Directors
or the Compensation Committee.
---------------
NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY SET FORTH IN ANY OF THE
CORPORATION'S PREVIOUS FILINGS UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (THE "EXCHANGE ACT"), THAT
MIGHT INCORPORATE FUTURE FILINGS, INCLUDING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN WHOLE OR IN
PART, THE FOLLOWING COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND
THE PERFORMANCE GRAPH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SUCH REPORT SHALL NOT BE
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH FILINGS.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed
exclusively of nonemployee directors, is responsible for the Corporation's
executive compensation programs. The following is the report of the
Compensation Committee on compensation policies regarding executive officers
and the basis of compensation actions it has taken.
The objective of the Corporation's executive compensation programs is to
offer compensation opportunities that attract and retain talented executive
officers and key employees and that motivate such employees to enhance
shareholder value. Base pay, annual incentives and long-term incentives are
structured to deliver competitive pay opportunities, reward individual
performance and encourage executives to manage from the perspective of owners
with an equity stake in the Corporation. The executive compensation programs
are intended to provide total compensation (consisting of base salaries, annual
cash incentive opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities) that is
competitive with the median total compensation offered other executives
employed by companies of similar size, complexity and lines of business. To
determine competitive compensation levels, the Compensation Committee considers
data from surveys, proxy statements and independent compensation consultants.
The attainment of corporate, business group and, in some instances, individual
performance goals determines the payouts from the annual incentive compensation
plans. Long-term incentive compensation awards are designed to link a
significant portion of total pay directly to long-term financial performance
and creation of shareholder value.
To underscore the importance of linking executive and shareholder
interests, the Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for
executive officers and other members of senior management. The target level of
ownership of Common Stock (or Common Stock equivalents) for the Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer under such guidelines is three
times annual salary. The target level for other officers who are members of the
Corporation's Policy Committee, including Messrs. Coley, Fowler, Blackburn and
Osborne, is two times annual salary. Each employee subject to the guidelines is
expected to achieve the ownership target within a period of five years,
commencing on the later of January 1, 1997, or the date upon which the employee
became subject to the guidelines. Common Stock held in an executive's
Retirement Savings Plan account, Common Stock equivalents earned through
non-qualified deferred compensation programs and any Common Stock beneficially
owned outside such programs are included in determining compliance with the
guidelines.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 162(M) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a limitation on the
Corporation's ability to deduct from income tax annual compensation in excess
of $1 million paid to certain employees, generally the chief executive officer
and the four other most highly compensated executive officers. The Compensation
Committee intends to structure compensation that rewards performance while
preserving maximum deductibility of all compensation awards. Towards this end,
in 1998 the Board of Directors recommended and shareholders approved the Duke
Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan
11
<PAGE>
and the Duke Energy Corporation Policy Committee Short-Term Incentive Plan to
allow future grants of stock options (under the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan)
and other performance awards to satisfy the requirements for exemption from
Section 162(m). It is not anticipated that compensation realized by any
executive officer under programs now in effect will result in a material loss
of tax deductions.
BASE SALARIES
The Compensation Committee believes that a significant percentage of each
individual's compensation should be at risk as incentive compensation.
Therefore, the Compensation Committee tends to be conservative in establishing
salary opportunities and typically sets them at a level which approximates the
competitive median as determined by survey data. Individual executive officer's
salaries are reviewed annually and increases are determined by the Compensation
Committee based upon job responsibilities, level of experience, individual
performance and data obtained from surveys, consultants and staff research. No
salary increase was approved by the Compensation Committee for any Named
Executive Officer in 1998.
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
In 1998, the Compensation Committee administered two annual incentive
plans that permitted the granting of cash awards. Policy Committee members,
including Messrs. Priory, Anderson (before his resignation), Coley, Fowler,
Blackburn and Osborne, earned incentive compensation under the Policy Committee
Short-Term Incentive Plan, while other executive officers earned incentive
compensation under the Duke Energy Short-Term Incentive Plan. Individual
incentive targets under both Plans are intended to pay amounts equal to the
competitive median when target performance is achieved and to reward
outstanding results by paying bonuses of up to 150% of target when outstanding
results are achieved.
Awards under the Policy Committee Short-Term Incentive Plan were
calculated pursuant to a formula based upon the Corporation's earnings per
share (EPS). Minimum, target and maximum performance levels were established,
and participants could receive up to 150% of their short-term incentive
targets. According to the range of EPS threshold amounts established by the
Compensation Committee at the beginning of 1998, EPS resulted in payments of
110% of bonus targets to each Policy Committee member, including the Named
Executive Officers, prior to changes in such amounts as determined by the
Compensation Committee because of individual performance.
Awards under the Duke Energy Short-Term Incentive Plan, in which executive
officers other than members of the Policy Committee participated, were
determined on the basis of a combination of 1) EPS measures, 2) earnings before
interest and income taxes (EBIT) measures and, in some instances, other
measures unique to individual business groups, and 3) individual objectives.
Each of these three components determined one-third of each executive officer's
bonus.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
In 1998, the Compensation Committee approved the award of non-qualified
stock options (as described earlier in the proxy statement) to members of the
Policy Committee under the Duke Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. Also in 1998, the Compensation Committee approved the award of
non-qualified stock options to executive officers who were not members of the
Policy Committee under the Duke Power Company Stock Incentive Plan approved in
1996. The number of stock options granted was determined through a process
which: first, utilizes survey data to determine the annualized value of
long-term incentive compensation made to other executives and management
employees in comparable positions in companies with which the Corporation
competes for executive talent (target value), second, uses a variant of the
Black-Scholes stock option pricing model to calculate a ratio which, when
multiplied by the exercise price of the option, produces an expected present
value of the option, and third, calculates the number of options required to
make a competitive long-term grant by dividing target value by the expected
present value of a single option. The result of this process, expressed as a
number of options, may be adjusted by the Compensation Committee, or, in some
cases, its designee, depending upon the grant recipient's qualitative and
quantitative performance, the size of stock option awards in the past, and
expectations of the grant recipient's future performance.
OTHER COMPENSAION
In 1998 the Compensation Committee approved one-time payments to certain
employees whose long-term and short-term compensation was not adjusted at the
time of the merger of the Corporation with PanEnergy Corp, when, with regard to
those employees, there was a significant change in responsibilities as a result
of the merger, clear evidence of a compensation shortfall based on survey data
and a significant contribution by the employees to the success of the merger.
Messrs. Priory, Coley and Osborne qualified for and were awarded such one-time
payments in the amounts of $910,000, $162,000 and $140,000, respectively.
12
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Prior to the merger of the Corporation and PanEnergy Corp, the
Compensation Committee commissioned its compensation consultant to prepare an
independent report regarding the level of compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, considering in particular the size of the
Corporation, its complexity and the markets in which the Corporation competes
for executive talent. Based upon the Compensation Committee's analysis of the
consultant's report, the Compensation Committee at its June 1997 meeting
adjusted Mr. Priory's annual base salary to $810,000 and adjusted his annual
short-term incentive target to 100% of base salary beginning on January 1,
1998. Also based upon its analysis of the consultant's report, the Compensation
Committee granted Mr. Priory an award of non-qualified stock options to
purchase 500,000 shares of Common Stock under the Duke Energy Corporation 1998
Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee believes that this award
has put in place a mechanism which will result in meaningful rewards to Mr.
Priory for substantial improvements in shareholder value. The Compensation
Committee will consider additional stock option awards as it deems appropriate
from time to time.
It is the Compensation Committee's intention that, when taken together,
the components of Mr. Priory's pay, including salary, short-term incentive
opportunity and annualized long-term incentive award value, will result in
compensation which approximates the 50th percentile of the market when
incentive plan performance expectations are met and for compensation as high as
the 75th percentile of the market when results exceed expectations.
This report has been provided by the Compensation Committee.
LEO E. LINBECK, JR., Chairman
WILLIAM T. ESREY
GEORGE DEAN JOHNSON, JR.
JAMES G. MARTIN
13
<PAGE>
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Note: The stock price performance shown on the graph below is not
necessarily indicative of future price performance.
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG THE CORPORATION, S&P 500 INDEX,
S&P UTILITIES INDEX AND DOW JONES UTILITIES AVERAGE
(Performance Chart appears here -- see table below for plot points)
Assumes $100 invested on Dec. 31, 1993
in Duke Common Stock, S&P 500 Index,
S&P Utilities Index, and DJ Utilities.
Assumes reinvestment of dividends.
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
----------------------------------------------------
Duke 100 95 122 125 155 186
S&P 500 Index 100 101 139 170 227 291
S&P Utilities 100 92 129 133 165 188
DJ Utilities 100 85 111 121 147 174
The above performance graph features two widely published industry
indices, the S&P Utilities Index and the Dow Jones Utilities Average, in
satisfaction of the requirement for a comparative industry index. The
Corporation believes that the use of both of these indices provides the best
opportunity for comparison of the Corporation's total cumulative return with
those of significant peer companies in the electric and gas industries.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
ARRANGEMENTS
The Corporation entered into employment agreements dated as of November
24, 1996 with Messrs. Priory, Coley, Fowler, Osborne and Anderson, which became
effective on June 18, 1997 (the "Effective Time") and which remain in effect
for a two-year period from the Effective Time or such longer period as may be
mutually agreed upon by the parties to such agreements (the "Employment
Period"). The employment agreements were amended in October 1997 (as amended,
the "Employment Agreements"), when the Corporation and the employees mutually
agreed to short-term and long-term incentive opportunities. The principal terms
and conditions of the Employment Agreements are described below.
The Employment Agreements for Messrs. Priory, Coley, Fowler and Osborne
provide for an annual base salary that is at least equal to the executive's
annual base salary for the twelve-month period prior to the Effective Time
(i.e., Messrs. Priory, Coley, Fowler and Osborne were paid $476,509, $378,947,
$260,000 and $253,200, respectively, as base salary in 1996). Those Employment
Agreements also provide for an annual bonus opportunity of 100% for Mr. Priory
and 60% for each of Messrs. Coley, Fowler and Osborne under the terms of the
Duke Energy Corporation Policy Committee Short-Term Incentive Plan calculated
as a percentage of annual base salary. Each such executive is entitled to
participate in all long-term incentive plans, savings, retirement, welfare
benefit plans on the same basis as other peer executives of the Corporation.
The Employment Agreements also provided that Messrs. Priory, Coley, Fowler and
Osborne were to receive non-qualified stock options to purchase 500,000,
200,000, 200,000 and 100,000 shares of Common Stock, respectively. Such options
were issued under the Duke Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan. In
the event the executive's employment is terminated for "Good Reason" by the
executive or without "Cause" by the Corporation (both as defined in the
Employment Agreements), Messrs. Priory, Coley and Osborne will be entitled to
receive a lump-sum severance payment
14
<PAGE>
equal to the product of three times the executive's annual base salary and
target bonus and Mr. Fowler will be entitled to receive a lump-sum severance
payment equal to two times annual base salary and target bonus. In addition,
for three years following the executive's date of termination for "Good Reason"
or without "Cause" by the Corporation, Messrs. Priory, Coley and Osborne will
be entitled to continued coverage under the medical, life insurance and other
welfare benefit plans of the Corporation; Mr. Fowler's coverage would be
extended for two years and he would receive supplemental pension benefits
calculated as if he had an additional two years of service. In the event that
any of the payments or benefits provided for in the relevant Employment
Agreement would constitute a "parachute payment" (as defined in section
280G(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code), the executive is entitled to elect to
reduce such payments or benefits so that the excise tax imposed by section 4999
of the Internal Revenue Code would not apply. Each of the Priory, Coley,
Osborne and Fowler Employment Agreements contains a restrictive covenant that
prohibits the executive from disclosing or using certain confidential
information while employed by the Corporation and at any time thereafter.
The Employment Agreement of Paul M. Anderson provided that Mr. Anderson
would serve as Chief Operating Officer and President of the Corporation, a
member of the Office of the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the
Corporation's Policy Committee. The Anderson Employment Agreement further
provided that during the Employment Period Mr. Anderson would receive an annual
base salary of no less than $700,000, an annual bonus opportunity set at a
target level of no less than 90% of Mr. Anderson's base salary claimed under
the terms of the Duke Energy Corporation Policy Committee Short-Term Incentive
Plan, and a supplementary salary payment in the event that Mr. Anderson became
subject to North Carolina taxes such that the amount of Mr. Anderson's
after-tax compensation would be no less than the amount he would have received
absent the imposition of North Carolina taxes. In addition, Mr. Anderson was to
be awarded 400,000 nonqualified stock options, which were issued in 1998. Such
options were issued under the Duke Energy Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. Pursuant to the Anderson Employment Agreement, the Corporation also
provided Mr. Anderson with deferred compensation payable upon his attainment of
the age of 55, accruing at a monthly rate of $83,334, plus interest, for each
of the twenty-four months following the Effective Time. The Anderson Employment
Agreement prohibits Mr. Anderson from disclosing or using certain confidential
information while employed by the Corporation and at any time thereafter. The
Anderson Employment Agreement also provided that if Mr. Anderson's employment
terminated before the end of the Employment Period (except in the case of
termination for "Cause" or "Disability" as defined in the Employment
Agreement), Mr. Anderson would be entitled to the following: (i) a lump-sum
payment aggregating accrued obligations (such as unpaid salary and a pro rata
portion of his target bonus opportunity) to Mr. Anderson, and (ii) retirement
benefits, including qualified defined benefit retirement benefits, excess or
supplemental retirement benefits, and welfare benefits, as if Mr. Anderson had
reached early retirement age as of the date of termination of his employment.
In the event that compensation payments to Mr. Anderson would subject him to
excise tax under section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Corporation
would reduce such payments if and to the extent it would maximize Mr.
Anderson's after-tax compensation. Upon Mr. Anderson's resignation, effective
November 15, 1998, he received the payments described above and in the Summary
Compensation Table.
The Corporation entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Blackburn,
effective November 10, 1997, in connection with his employment as Executive
Vice President and General Counsel of the Corporation and a member of the
Policy Committee. The term of the employment agreement extended through
December 31, 1998. The agreement established an initial annual base salary of
$360,000 and an annual incentive target opportunity of 60% of base salary under
the Duke Energy Corporation Policy Committee Short-Term Incentive Plan. The
Agreement also provided for an award of 150,000 stock options which were
granted in 1998 at the same time and under the same terms as grants of stock
options to other Policy Committee members. The agreement further provided for
the award of 9000 shares of restricted stock in three equal grants of 3000
shares in January 1998, January 1999 and January 2000. With respect to each
such grant, 1,000 shares were to vest on each of the three successive
anniversary dates of the original award of the grant. It was also agreed that
Mr. Blackburn would be eligible to participate in the executive benefits plans
that are available to other members of the Policy Committee. The Blackburn
employment agreement further contained a non-competition clause and
confidentiality provision.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The fixed annual retainer for nonemployee directors of the Corporation is
$40,000. Additional annual compensation for serving as the Chairman of the
Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance, Corporate Performance Review or
Finance Committees is $4,000. In addition, nonemployee directors receive a fee
of $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors, each
committee meeting and other functions of the Corporation requiring their
presence, together with expenses of attendance.
15
<PAGE>
A nonemployee director may elect to receive 50% of his or her retainer and
attendance fees in the form of Common Stock or may defer such portion by having
it held in trust for the director's benefit and invested in Common Stock at
market price. The director may elect to receive the remaining 50% of such
compensation in cash or may elect to defer, until termination of service on the
Board of Directors, that portion in trust as shares of Common Stock or in an
investment account that is credited with interest based upon the interest paid
on 30-year U.S. Treasury Bonds.
Each January and July that a nonemployee director continues to serve on
the Board of Directors, such director is credited with 100 shares of Common
Stock to be held in trust. In general, shares of Common Stock held in trust,
and income thereon, will not become distributable until the nonemployee
director terminates service on the Board of Directors. Dividends will be
converted into additional shares held in trust at fair market value on the
dividend payment date. When a nonemployee director terminates service on the
Board of Directors, shares held in trust for his or her account will be
distributed to the director on the basis of the distribution schedule chosen by
such director.
Upon completing ten years of service on the Board of Directors, certain
directors become eligible to participate in the Directors' Charitable Giving
Program. Under this program, the Corporation will make, upon the director's
death, donations of up to $1,000,000 to charitable organizations selected by
the director. A director may request that the Corporation make donations under
this program during the director's lifetime, in which case the maximum donation
will be reduced on a net present value basis. The Corporation maintains life
insurance policies upon eligible directors to fund donations under the program.
Eligible directors include only those who were members of the Board of
Directors on February 18, 1998, and certain former directors who previously
qualified for benefits.
Nonemployee directors are subject to the Corporation's stock ownership
guidelines which require nonemployee directors to build and maintain holdings
of Common Stock (or Common Stock equivalents) equal in market value to three
times the annual retainer ($120,000). Nonemployee directors must attain this
ownership level within five years from January 1, 1997, the date of
implementation of the guidelines, or from the commencement of their service on
the Board of Directors, if after the implementation date.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors had eight meetings during 1998. No director
attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board of
Directors held during the period for which he or she was a director and the
meetings of the committees upon which he or she served during the period for
which he or she was a director.
Among its standing committees the Corporation has a Management Committee,
an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Corporate Governance Committee,
a Corporate Performance Review Committee, and a Finance Committee.
The Management Committee consists of Richard B. Priory and William A.
Coley. This Committee may exercise all of the authority of the Board of
Directors except with respect to certain actions specified in the Corporation's
By-Laws.
The Audit Committee consists of Robert J. Brown, Ann Maynard Gray, Max
Lennon, Leo E. Linbeck, Jr. and Russell M. Robinson, II. This Committee
recommends to the Board of Directors the engagement of the independent auditors
for the Corporation, determines the scope of the auditing of the books and
accounts of the Corporation, reviews reports submitted by the auditors,
examines procedures employed in connection with the Corporation's internal
audit program and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors as may be
appropriate. The Committee held seven meetings during 1998.
The Compensation Committee consists of William T. Esrey, George Dean
Johnson, Jr., Leo E. Linbeck, Jr. and James G. Martin. This Committee sets the
salaries and other compensation of all executive officers of the Corporation
except the Chairman of the Board. This Committee makes recommendations to the
Board of Directors regarding the salary and other compensation of the Chairman
of the Board for consideration and action by the Board of Directors, without
the presence or participation of the Chairman of the Board. The Committee also
makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the compensation of
nonemployee directors. The Committee held seven meetings during 1998.
The Corporate Governance Committee considers matters related to corporate
governance and formulates and periodically revises principles for board
governance, recommends to the Board of Directors the size and composition of
the Board of Directors within the limits set forth in the Corporation's
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws and recommends persons to be considered
as successors to the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee will consider
nominees for the Board of Directors recommended by shareholders. The Committee,
consisting of William T. Esrey, Dennis R. Hendrix, Max Lennon, James G. Martin
and Richard B. Priory, met three times in 1998.
16
<PAGE>
The Corporate Performance Review Committee consists of G. Alex Bernhardt,
Sr., Robert J. Brown, Ann Maynard Gray, Dennis R. Hendrix, Harold S. Hook and
Russell M. Robinson, II. This Committee monitors and makes recommendations for
improving the overall performance of the Corporation, and, at the policy level,
determines the adequacy of and support for the Corporation's emphasis on
continuous improvement. The Committee met six times during 1998.
The Finance Committee consists of G. Alex Bernhardt, Sr., Harold S. Hook,
George Dean Johnson, Jr., and Richard B. Priory. This Committee reviews the
financial and fiscal affairs of the Corporation and makes recommendations to
the Board of Directors regarding the Corporation's dividend, financing and
fiscal policies. The Committee met six times during 1998.
In February 1998, the Corporation adopted a policy stating that members of
the Board of Directors are to submit their resignation as a matter of course
upon a change in employment or other significant change in their professional
roles and responsibilities, with the exception of the normal retirement of
those individuals who were members of the Board of Directors on the date the
policy was adopted. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether
any such resignation will be accepted. It is expected that acceptance of any
such resignation will be effective as of the end of the term of the director
tendering the resignation.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Corporation has had business relationships and engaged in certain
transactions with affiliated parties. It is the policy of the Corporation to
engage in transactions with related parties only on terms that, in the opinion
of the Corporation, are no less favorable to the Corporation than could be
obtained from unrelated parties.
During 1998, the Corporation retained the law firm of Robinson, Bradshaw &
Hinson, P.A., of which Russell M. Robinson, II, a director of the Corporation,
is a shareholder, in connection with a number of matters. Fees for legal
services paid by the Corporation to the law firm in 1998 represented less than
5% of such firm's gross revenues for the year.
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
TO INCREASE AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK
(PROPOSAL 2)
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve the
adoption of a proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to increase
the amount of authorized Common Stock of the Corporation from 500,000,000 to
1,000,000,000. As of December 31, 1998, 362,965,360 shares of Common Stock were
issued and 137,034,640 were unissued, including approximately 25,000,000 shares
reserved for issuance under the Corporation's stock plans.
The additional shares of Common Stock, if authorized, would have the same
rights and privileges as the shares of Common Stock presently outstanding and
could in the future be issued for any proper corporate purpose. The
Corporation's Articles of Incorporation provide that the shares of Common Stock
of the Corporation do not have preemptive rights.
In 1997, in connection with the merger of the Corporation and PanEnergy
Corp, the Corporation's shareholders approved an increase in the authorized
Common Stock from 300,000,000 shares to 500,000,000 shares, primarily to enable
the Corporation to issue the additional shares necessary to consummate the
merger. The Board of Directors believes that the proposed increase in the
number of authorized shares of Common Stock will be advantageous to the
Corporation and its shareholders because it will provide the Corporation with
added flexibility in effecting financings, stock splits or stock dividends,
stock plans and other transactions and arrangements involving the use of stock.
The Board of Directors has the authority to issue additional shares of Common
Stock without shareholder approval except as may be required by law or
regulatory agencies or by the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Although the Corporation is always alert to opportunities, it has no present
intention to issue any of the newly authorized shares of Common Stock.
Furthermore, the Board of Directors is not proposing the increase in authorized
shares of Common Stock with the intention of discouraging tender offers or
takeover attempts. However, in the event of an unsolicited tender offer or
takeover proposal, the increased number of shares could give the Board of
Directors greater flexibility to act in the best interests of the Corporation
and its shareholders.
Unless required by law or by the applicable rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, no further authorization for the issuance of Common Stock by the
shareholders would be necessary, but any such issuance would be subject to the
approval of the North Carolina Utilities Commission and The Public Service
Commission of South Carolina.
17
<PAGE>
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
(PROPOSAL 3)
The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, has
reappointed, subject to shareholder ratification, the firm of Deloitte & Touche
LLP, certified public accountants, as independent auditors to make an
examination of the accounts of the Corporation for the year 1999. If the
shareholders do not ratify this appointment, other certified public accountants
will be considered by the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Audit
Committee.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.
A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will, as in prior years, attend
the annual meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and be
available to respond to appropriate questions.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
(PROPOSAL 4)
THE CORPORATION HAS BEEN ADVISED THAT ROBERT B. MILLS (OWNER OF RECORD OF
30 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK), 1443 GORSUCH AVENUE, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21218 AND
EDWARD LEWIS KING (OWNER OF RECORD OF 186 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK), 846
CANTERBURY ROAD NE, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30324, INTEND TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING
PROPOSAL AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.
THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT AND THE OPPOSING
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE SET FORTH BELOW.
A Shareholder Proposal to the Duke Power Company for consideration at its 1999
Annual Meeting
REFUSE PLUTONIUM FUEL FOR COMMERCIAL REACTORS
Whereas: The Department of Energy (DOE) plans to dispose of surplus weapons
plutonium by immobilization in ceramics and possibly as plutonium/uranium (MOX)
fuel for commercial reactors (to prevent diversion to bomb making and
environmental dispersal);
Whereas: Duke Power has expressed interest in using MOX fuel;
Whereas: I believe the public opposes using weapons plutonium fuel because I
believe it would: (1) be too dangerous because it would be more hazardous to
control during fissioning in reactors, increasing operating risks and component
aging; (2) still be weapons-usable, so would require heavy security in transit
and at reactors (greater proliferation potential than immobilization); (3) be
more costly to fabricate the fuel and to operate the reactors; (4) violate the
barrier between nuclear power and nuclear weapons; (5) generate nearly as much
new plutonium during fissioning as it initially contained, resulting in little
net loss of plutonium; (6) generate great quantities of radioactive waste,
exacerbating the already critical, unresolved problems of radioactive waste
storage; (7) increase the likelihood of locking the U.S. into a deadly
plutonium economy;
Whereas: The DOE has a poor track record over the last 23 years managing large
projects;
Whereas: The potential financial rewards are too small to justify the large
risks to some of the Company's most valuable assets;
Whereas: Cost-cutting to meet the new competition shakes public confidence that
Duke Energy could maintain adequate safety and security if the more risky
plutonium fuel were used;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the shareholders request the Board of Directors
to establish a firm policy to refuse to use plutonium (MOX) fuel.
Shareholders Supporting Statement:
Weapons plutonium cannot be fissioned directly, but must undergo complicated
and dangerous processing, creating additional radioactive waste. No conversion
facilities exist in the U.S. It could be many years before MOX could be
produced, extending plutonium accessibility for diversion or theft. During
these delays, economic or technical conditions may close candidate reactors.
Regulatory uncertainties between the DOE and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) could complicate the process, introducing further adverse economic
conditions for the utility.
18
<PAGE>
European experience using MOX is only from reprocessed commercial reactor
wastes, not the experimental weapons plutonium. European support for MOX is
declining. European reprocessing corporations are a driving force of the MOX
promotion, and falsely claim that the U.S. must use MOX to win Russia's
cooperation with surplus plutonium disposition. Rather, the U.S. should lead in
developing the most effective way to immobilize weapons plutonium directly, and
assist all others in this choice.
The safety of hundreds of future generations depends upon the careful isolation
of plutonium from the biosphere. Use of weapons plutonium in commercial
reactors would create a dangerous precedent. For economic, safety,
environmental, and nonproliferation reasons, I urge your supporting vote for
this proposal.
OPPOSING STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
In MOX fuel, a small amount of plutonium oxide (approximately 5%) is blended
with uranium oxide (approximately 95%). The resulting fuel is very similar to
the uranium fuel that is currently used in power reactors such as those in the
Corporation's McGuire and Catawba plants. There are decades of successful
experience with MOX fuel, and it is widely used in Europe today. In France
alone, 17 pressurized water reactors, very similar to those in the McGuire and
Catawba plants, are currently using MOX fuel.
Using MOX fuel in U.S. reactors is a key part of the international
nonproliferation initiative to dispose of surplus weapons plutonium in the
United States and Russia. Currently, surplus plutonium in both countries is
simply being stored, raising the risk (especially in Russia) that the plutonium
could be stolen, diverted, or re-used in weapons. The MOX fuel project involves
converting plutonium from nuclear weapons into MOX fuel and using that fuel in
commercial reactors. Irradiation of MOX fuel in a reactor destroys much of the
original plutonium and degrades the remainder so that it is no longer
attractive for weapons use. The program to dispose of surplus weapons material
was recommended by the National Academy of Sciences and has the strong support
of the U.S. government and other industrialized nations.
In the proposed program, surplus plutonium will be converted to plutonium
oxide, blended with uranium oxide, and fabricated into MOX fuel on a U.S.
government site (most likely the Savannah River Site in South Carolina). The
completed and sealed MOX fuel assemblies, virtually indistinguishable from
uranium fuel assemblies, will be shipped to the McGuire and Catawba plants for
irradiation. Many years of European experience, government-sponsored studies,
and evaluations by the Corporation indicate that MOX fuel can be used safely.
However, before receiving and irradiating MOX fuel at the McGuire and Catawba
plants, the Corporation must first apply for and receive amendments to their
respective facility operating licenses from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC). In order to receive these necessary regulatory approvals, the
Corporation will have to demonstrate to the NRC that MOX fuel poses no
significant hazard to the health and safety of the public.
The Corporation will pay substantially less for the MOX fuel than for the
equivalent quantity of uranium fuel. Therefore, the Corporation will realize
direct economic benefits through lower nuclear fuel prices.
THE MOX FUEL PROGRAM OFFERS THE CORPORATION AN OPPORTUNITY TO BENEFIT ITS
SHAREHOLDERS AT THE SAME TIME AS IT MAKES A MEANINGFUL CONTRIBUTION TO
NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. IN THE WORDS OF THE LATE WILLIAM
S. LEE III, WHO WAS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND PRESIDENT OF THE CORPORATION FOR
MANY YEARS:
It's clearly in the interest of world peace to make a substantial
investment in the safe dismantling and disposal of nuclear weapons. The
opportunity to earn a return on that investment by reclaiming materials for
peaceful uses seems too sensible to ignore. We should move now to convert
our nuclear weapons to power plant fuel and assist others to do the same.
Twentieth century swords can literally become the plowshares that work to
fuel a growing, more prosperous global economy in the 21st century.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.
OTHER MATTERS
On the date this proxy statement went to press, management did not know of
any other matters to be brought before the meeting other than those described
in this proxy statement. If any matters come before the meeting that are not
specifically set forth on the proxy card and in this proxy statement, it is the
intention of the persons named in the proxy card to vote thereon in accordance
with their best judgment.
19
<PAGE>
PROPOSALS FOR 2000 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholders who intend to present proposals at the annual meeting in 2000
pursuant to the procedures under Rule 14a-8 of the SEC, and who wish to have
such proposals included in the Corporation's proxy statement for that meeting,
must be certain that such proposals are received by the Secretary of the
Corporation by November 12, 1999. Such proposals must meet the requirements set
forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC in order to be eligible for
inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2000 annual meeting.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
To the Corporation's knowledge, based on information furnished to it and
contained in the reports filed pursuant to Rule 16a-3 of the Exchange Act, as
well as any written representations that no other reports were required, all
applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with during the year
ended December 31, 1998.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
A COPY OF THE CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998, WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED WITH THE SEC, WILL BE MADE
AVAILABLE TO HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK TO WHOM THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS MAILED,
WITHOUT CHARGE, UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE INVESTOR RELATIONS DEPARTMENT, DUKE
ENERGY CORPORATION, P.O. BOX 1005, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28201-1005.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please mark, sign, date and
promptly return the enclosed proxy in the enclosed envelope. No postage is
required for mailing in the United States.
By Order of the Board of Directors
RICHARD W. BLACKBURN
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 12, 1999
20
<PAGE>
[DUKE ENERGY LOGO APPEARS HERE]
<PAGE>
Duke Energy Corporation
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
April 15, 1999 at 10:00 a.m.
Energy Center-O.J. Miller Auditorium
526 South Church Street
Charlotte, NC
[Map of Charlotte Location Appeared Here]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints R.B. Priory, R.J. Osborne and R.W. Blackburn,
and each of them, proxies, with the powers the undersigned would possess if
personally present, and with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of
Common Stock of Duke Energy Corporation of the undersigned at the annual meeting
of shareholders to be held in the Energy Center, 526 South Church Street,
Charlotte, North Carolina, on April 15, 1999, and at any adjournment thereof,
upon all subjects that may come before the meeting, including the matters
described in the proxy statement furnished herewith, subject to any directions
indicated on the reverse side of this card. IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, THE
INDIVIDUALS DESIGNATED ABOVE WILL VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR
NOMINEES, IN ACCORD WITH THE DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE OTHER SUBJECTS
LISTED ON THE REVERSE OF THIS CARD AND AT THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTER
THAT MAY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.
Your vote for the election of directors may be indicated on the reverse.
Nominees are G. Alex Bernhardt, Sr., William A. Coley, Max Lennon and Leo E.
Linbeck, Jr.
Please sign on reverse and return promptly in the enclosed return envelope.
<PAGE>
[DUKE ENERGY LOGO
APPEARS HERE]
To Participants in the Duke Energy
Retirement Savings Plan:
As a participant in the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan, you have the right
to direct the Plan trustee in the voting of those shares of Duke Energy Common
Stock that are held by the Plan and allocated to your Plan account, on any
issues presented at Duke Energy's 1999 annual shareholder meeting, to be held
April 15 in Charlotte, N.C.
I encourage you to read the enclosed Proxy Statement and to complete the
attached proxy to direct the voting of the shares allocated to your Plan
account. Your Plan participant proxy will be treated confidentially. If you
elect not to return a completed proxy, shares allocated to your Plan account
will be voted by the Plan trustee in the same proportion as those shares held by
the Plan for which the Plan trustee has received direction from Plan
participants. Even though you may have returned a proxy for shares owned outide
the Plan, you are encouraged to exercise your rights by completing and returning
the enclosed proxy.
Sincerely,
R.B. Priory
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Directors recommend a vote "FOR" Items 1, 2 and 3 and a vote "AGAINST" Item 4
1. Election of four directors who will constitute Class II of
the Board of Directors.
To vote your shares for all director nominees, or to withhold voting for
all nominees, mark the appropriate box. If you do not wish your shares
voted for a particular director nominee, mark the "For*" box and enter
the name(s) of the exceptions in the space provided.
2. Proposal to increase the authorized Common Stock of
the Corporation from 500,000,000 shares to
1,000,000,000 shares.
3. Ratification of appointment of auditors.
4. Shareholder proposal
BEFORE MAILING, PLEASE DETACH THIS PORTION.
================================================================================
[DUKE ENERGY LOGO
APPEARS HERE]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Withhold * Except for the following
For All For* Authority ------------------ ----------------
[ ] [ ] [ ] ------------------ ----------------
------------------ ----------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
2.
For Against Abstain
[ ] [ ] [ ]
------------------------
JOHN A SHAREHOLDER ------------------------ ------------------------
422 S. CHURCH STREET 3. 4.
PB01H For Against Abstain For Against Abstain
CHARLOTTE, NC 28242-0001 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
------------------------ ------------------------
If you plan to attend the meeting, please mark: [ ]
If you do not wish to receive an Annual Report for this account, please mark:[ ]
ALLOCATION OF SHARES HELD BY RSP AS OF FEBRUARY 22, 1999
Shares
300.0352
Sign here as
------------------------------------
name(s) appears above Date ,1999
------------------------------------ -----------------
PLEASE SIGN THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND
THE MEETING. If signing for a corporation or partnership or as agent, attorney
or fiduciary, indicate the capacity in which you are signing. Each joint owner
should sign. If you do attend the meeting and decide to vote by ballot, such
vote will supersede this proxy.
<PAGE>
[DUKE ENERGY LOGO
APPEARS HERE]
DEAR SHAREHOLDER:
I hope you will join me and your fellow shareholders at Duke Energy's annual
meeting, which begins at 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 15, in the O.J. Miller
Auditorium, located in the Energy Center, 526 South Church St.,
Charlotte, North Carolina.
Shareholders will be asked to vote on the election of four directors, a proposal
to increase the authorized Common Stock, the ratification of appointment of
auditors and a shareholder proposal.
I hope to see you personally on April 15 in Charlotte.
Sincerely,
R.B. Priory
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Directors recommend a vote "FOR" Items 1, 2 and 3 and a vote "AGAINST" Item 4
1. Election of four directors who will constitute Class II of
the Board of Directors.
To vote your shares for all director nominees, or to withhold voting for
all nominees, mark the appropriate box. If you do not wish your shares
voted for a particular director nominee, mark the "For*" box and enter
the name(s) of the exceptions in the space provided.
2. Proposal to increase the authorized Common Stock of
the Corporation from 500,000,000 shares to
1,000,000,000 shares.
3. Ratification of appointment of auditors.
4. Shareholder proposal
BEFORE MAILING, PLEASE DETACH THIS PORTION.
================================================================================
[DUKE ENERGY LOGO
APPEARS HERE]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Withhold * Except for the following
For All For* Authority ------------------ ----------------
[ ] [ ] [ ] ------------------ ----------------
------------------ ----------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
2.
For Against Abstain
[ ] [ ] [ ]
------------------------
JOHN A SHAREHOLDER ------------------------ ------------------------
422 S. CHURCH STREET 3. 4.
PB01H For Against Abstain For Against Abstain
CHARLOTTE, NC 28242-0001 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
------------------------ ------------------------
If you plan to attend the meeting, please mark: [ ]
If you do not wish to receive an Annual Report for this account, please mark:[ ]
ALLOCATION OF SHARES HELD BY RSP AS OF FEBRUARY 22, 1999
Shares Account Number
300.0352 000052335
Sign here as
------------------------------------
name(s) appears above Date ,1999
------------------------------------ -----------------
PLEASE SIGN THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND
THE MEETING. If signing for a corporation or partnership or as agent, attorney
or fiduciary, indicate the capacity in which you are signing. Each joint owner
should sign. If you do attend the meeting and decide to vote by ballot, such
vote will supersede this proxy.
