<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT TO ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1993
Commission file number 1-7894
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
California 95-2312900
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, #1800 90024-3913
Los Angeles, California (Zip Code)
(Address of principal
executive offices)
</TABLE>
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (213) 879-1480
AMENDMENT NO. 2
The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items,
financial statements, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 1993, as set forth on the pages attached
hereto:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5. Market for the Company's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 2
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ERLY Industries Inc.
------------------------------
Registrant
Date: July 8, 1994 By /s/ Richard N. McCombs
------------------------------
Richard N. McCombs
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE> 3
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-K/A ANNUAL REPORT
AMENDMENT NO. 2
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Part I
- - - ------
Item 1: Business See pages 2-11
Item 2: Properties See pages 12-13
Item 3: Legal Proceedings See "Commitments and Contingencies"
on pages 69-70
Item 4: Submission of Matters See page 13
to a Vote of Security
Holders
Part II
- - - -------
Item 5: Market for the Company's See page 14
Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters
Item 6: Selected Financial Data See pages 29-30
Item 7: Management's Discussion See pages 31-41
and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of
Operations
Item 8: Consolidated Financial See pages 42-74
Statements
Item 9: Changes in and See page 14
Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure
Part III
- - - --------
Item 10: Directors and Executive See pages 15-16
Officers of the Company
Item 11: Executive Compensation See pages 17-22
Item 12: Security Ownership of See pages 22-24
Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management
Item 13: Certain Relationships See pages 24-25
and Related Transactions
Part IV
- - - -------
Item 14: Exhibits, Financial See pages 26-85
Statement Schedules and
Reports on Form 8-K
</TABLE>
1
<PAGE> 4
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ERLY Industries Inc. (the "Company" or "ERLY") is engaged primarily in the food
processing business, with rice and juice its principal food product lines. The
Company conducts its food processing business through Comet Rice, Inc. ("Comet
Rice" or "Comet"), one of the largest rice millers in the United States, and
ERLY Juice Inc. ("ERLY Juice"), a processor and bottler of orange juice,
grapefruit juice and other beverages. In May 1993, the Company completed a
transaction with American Rice, Inc. ("ARI") through which ERLY increased its
ownership interest in the voting power of ARI from 48% to 81%. American Rice
is an international company active in all phases of rice processing, trading
and marketing.
The Company also owns Chemonics Industries, Inc. ("Chemonics"), a subsidiary
with an international consulting division and a fire retardant chemicals
business.
ERLY was incorporated in California in 1964. Its executive offices are located
at 10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite #1800, Los Angeles, California, 90024.
COMET RICE, INC.
Comet purchases, processes and markets rice and rice by-products for sale in
domestic and foreign markets.
The Company entered the rice business in 1970 when it acquired all of the
assets of Comet which had operated through predecessor companies since 1902.
Subsequent acquisitions were made to add United Rice Growers and Millers (April
1979), PIRMI Delta, Inc. (October 1982), and Comet Rice of Puerto Rico, Inc.
(April 1983).
In 1988, Comet also acquired a 72% interest in Aqaba Packaging Company (APC),
incorporated under the laws of Jordan. The remaining 28% was owned by Amman
Resources, an unaffiliated Jordanian company. APC was formed for the purpose
of finishing and packaging rice for sales in Iraq, Jordan and other Middle East
markets. The primary asset of this corporation was a bulk receiving and
packaging facility in Aqaba, Jordan.
COMBINATION WITH AMERICAN RICE, INC.
In 1988, Comet acquired a 48% interest in American Rice, Inc. On March 7,
1991, the shareholders of ARI (including a majority of shareholders of ARI
other than ERLY) approved the merger of ARI into Comet, subject to obtaining
the required financing by the merger agreement. On August 23, 1992, ARI
entered into an Interim Forbearance Agreement with three of its lenders under
which, among other things, ARI agreed with these three lenders that the merger
agreement was effectively terminated as a result of the delays in obtaining the
necessary financing. The merger agreement was subsequently formally
terminated, as provided for in the merger agreement, based on the mutual
consent of both ARI and Comet, which was effective August 23, 1992.
During the period from August 23, 1992 through May 26, 1993, ARI obtained
numerous extensions and forbearances. However, by December 1, 1992 several
legal actions by some of ARI's lenders to exercise remedies commenced. The
legal actions included several postings by one of ARI's lenders, Rabobank, to
foreclose on ARI's Freeport properties. The last foreclosure date was set for
June 1, 1993.
2
<PAGE> 5
On May 26, 1993, ERLY, Comet and ARI consummated a transaction for ARI to
acquire substantially all of the assets of Comet and assume all of Comet's
liabilities (the "Transaction"). The Transaction was structured as a sale of
assets due to the need to complete the Transaction in a form that was
acceptable to the new lenders, so that it could be accomplished before the June
1, 1993 foreclosure date. ARI also refinanced the combined indebtedness of ARI
and Comet ("Refinancing"). Since ERLY, the sole shareholder of Comet, will own
the larger portion of the voting rights in the surviving corporation, the
Transaction is accounted for as a reverse acquisition of ARI by ERLY.
In exchange for the assets acquired (and liabilities assumed) from Comet, ARI
issued to ERLY 14,000,000 shares of a newly designated Series B Preferred
Stock, $1 par value. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock provides for
annual cumulative, non-participating dividends of $.37, is convertible into two
shares of ARI common stock, is entitled to two votes, and has a liquidation
preference of $1.00 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock carries an
aggregate dividend of approximately $5.2 million per year.
The refinancing included a $47.5 million line of credit by Congress Financial
and $65.3 million of term loans which were led by Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase).
Proceeds from this refinancing paid down ARI's $15 million revolving credit
line provided by Rabobank, Texas Commerce Bank (TCB) and Bank of America, ARI's
$13.3 million term loan provided by Rabobank, a settlement of ARI's $35.5
million term loan (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) held by
TCB, Bank for Cooperatives and six insurance companies, and a paydown of
Comet's revolving and term debt of $44.4 million provided by Chase,
Internationale Nederlanden Bank (ING Bank) and TCB.
Additional cash was required in order to complete refinancing for the
Transaction. Subsequent to the embargo on trade with Iraq in 1990 (see Export
Sales of Rice), the Aqaba facility was underutilized and during that period was
operating at approximately 10% of capacity. Prior to the Iraq embargo, the
Aqaba facility operated at over 90% of capacity. Although impartial access to
the Aqaba facility to all users of the facility subsequent to its sale in April
1993, will eliminate a major competitive advantage held by Comet in sales to
Iraq and Jordan, the reduced volume of U.S. rice shipped to those countries
during the past three years indicate that the disposal will have a minimal
effect on Comet's operations. Therefore, Comet sold its interest in APC in
April 1993 to the 28% owner for $2.5 million in cash and future payments to be
determined related to the quantity of U.S. rice packaged by the Aqaba facility.
Comet has no remaining affiliation with the purchaser.
The terms of the revolver included a two year commitment at an interest rate of
prime plus 2%. The $65.3 million term loans mature on December 31, 1997 with
annual principal repayments required of $4.2 million, $5.9 million, $5.9
million, $5.9 million and $43.4 million in fiscal years ending March 31, 1994,
1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. Interest rates range from prime plus
3% to prime plus 5% through May 1995, increasing to a range of prime plus 6% to
prime plus 8% by 1997.
ARI's loan agreements with its lenders contain various restrictions on the
ability of ARI to pay dividends on the Series B Preferred and, as a result, ARI
is currently precluded from paying the dividends. The Comet assets acquired by
ARI did not include the ARI stock previously held by Comet. In connection with
the Transaction, Comet transferred the ARI stock held by it to ERLY. Comet's
combined holdings of ARI common stock and ARI Series A Preferred Stock prior to
the Transaction, represented 48% of the voting power of the outstanding ARI
stock. As a result of the Transaction, ERLY holds 81% of the combined voting
power of ARI stock outstanding after the Transaction. In addition, ERLY is a
guarantor for all of the new ARI debt and the loan agreements contain certain
restrictive covenants applicable to ERLY.
3
<PAGE> 6
The Comet-ARI Transaction provides a significant benefit to the Company. The
Company's investment in ARI (carried on the Company's books as of March 31,
1993 at $13.1 million) is preserved and enhanced as a result of the
restructuring and resultant refinancing. As a result of the Transaction, ARI
should have improved ability to service debt, a more diversified market for its
products, an expanded share of domestic and export rice markets, more
diversified sources for its supply of rough rice and improved abilities to
reduce costs, operate more efficiently and develop markets for its products.
The Transaction is expected to reduce manufacturing and distribution costs for
both companies' facilities as both companies process and package product closer
to the ultimate customer which would increase gross margins. ARI's Freeport
facility, which operated at 85% and 72% capacity in fiscal 1993 and 1992,
respectively, provides Comet access to a Texas rice facility located on a
deepwater port. Comet will utilize excess capacity at the Freeport facility to
process and package rice for sales to Comet's Caribbean customers. ARI may
utilize Comet's California facility to package rice for sales to its California
customers.
Selling, general and administrative costs are also expected to be lower due to
the consolidation of these functions at both companies. It is estimated that
most of these savings will come from relatively lower personnel costs and
similar expenses such as legal, insurance and auditing fees.
The Transaction will allow better utilization of both companies' facilities due
to increased bank credit lines and working capital which will allow the Company
to purchase additional raw product and sell to more export markets.
As part of the Transaction, ARI and the Company have entered into a management
agreement. This agreement recognizes that ARI will be part of ERLY's group of
affiliated companies and as such will participate in the benefits of the
overall management and administrative expertise of ERLY. ARI will pay $900,000
per year to ERLY under the terms of this agreement. The amount to be paid by
ARI to ERLY is expected to provide a reasonable but not precise allocation of
management costs incurred by ERLY on behalf of ARI. There are, of course, no
comparable costs for such services as compared to those that could be obtained
from non-affiliated parties; however, the Company believes such costs are not
in excess of those that would be required to obtain such management services
from non-affiliated parties.
OPERATIONS
Comet's staff of buyers purchases rough rice from a large number of growers in
California, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Missouri. Comet's
purchases are customarily accomplished through competitive bidding against
various rice milling and marketing cooperatives and companies. The rough rice,
purchased from the rice growers, is delivered to one of Comet's storage plants
located in Maxwell, California; Stuttgart, Arkansas; Harrisburg, Arkansas
(disposed in April 1993); and Greenville, Mississippi (disposed in July 1992),
or to public warehouses or other storage facilities until it is transferred to
one of Comet's processing plants, located in Maxwell, California; Greenville,
Mississippi (disposed in July 1992); Arecibo, Puerto Rico (closed in September
1992); and Stuttgart, Arkansas. At these plants, Comet processes and mills the
rough rice into any one of its several rice products, including brown and white
rice, parboiled rice, rice flour, rice bran, millfeed and hulls.
4
<PAGE> 7
Comet's rice plant in Greenville, Mississippi was sold through foreclosure sale
in July 1992 (see Management's Discussion and Analysis and Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).
Comet packages processed rice in bulk bags or in branded consumer packages
under its own labels. Comet sells its rice products to approximately 300
customers, including food market chains, institutions, processors, exporters
and foreign customers.
The following table presents a comparison of Comet's domestic and export rice
sales in hundredweight ("cwt.") and dollars for the three years ended March 31,
1993:
Net sales of Comet Rice, Inc.
(Cwt. and dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Domestic Export Total
Years ended ---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------------
March 31 Cwt. $ % Cwt. $ % Cwt. $ %
----------- ----- ------- -- ----- ------- -- ------ ------- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1993 6,948 90,288 53 5,970 79,329 47 12,918 169,617 100
1992 6,542 101,373 47 7,921 112,717 53 14,463 214,090 100
1991 6,449 103,753 47 8,665 115,166 53 15,114 218,919 100
</TABLE>
Net sales are not necessarily indicative of operating profit since rough rice
costs vary significantly resulting in corresponding changes in selling prices.
This is particularly true in the export market where the volume of rice sold,
the cost of rough rice and Comet's milling margins vary from time to time
depending on fluctuations in the world market.
DOMESTIC SALES OF RICE
Comet sells rice in bulk to restaurants, institutions, governmental agencies,
cereal manufacturers, breweries, repackagers and other processors. Comet also
markets various brands of packaged rice to wholesalers and food market
retailers for household consumption. Comet's rice flour, bran and breading
products are purchased by customers in the bakery and specialty food
industries, and its rice by-products (including bran, hulls and millfeed) are
distributed through feed dealers.
Comet sells its rice products for use in domestic markets through direct
contact with major accounts and representation by a small network of
independent food brokers. Comet maintains a small sales organization to
supervise its dealings with brokers and to handle sales to national accounts.
Sales revenue from domestic sales has declined in each of the past two years
due to unit price decreases which have more than offset additional revenue from
increased volume. The price declines relate primarily to lower rough rice
cost.
EXPORT SALES OF RICE
Rice processed at milling facilities at Maxwell, California; Stuttgart,
Arkansas; and Greenville, Mississippi (disposed in July 1992) is sold in bulk
and in various bag sizes to export customers. Export sales are made directly
to customers in foreign countries and to U.S. exporters that in turn sell the
rice in foreign markets. A significant quantity of proprietary branded product
is included in packaged export sales. Comet's sales organization oversees
broker operations and sales to exporters.
5
<PAGE> 8
Export sales are subject to significant fluctuations due to wide variations in
supply and demand as a result of the impact of such factors as the relative
strength of the United States dollar to other foreign currencies and both U.S.
and foreign governmental agriculture and trade policies. Accordingly, sales by
geographical area will vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year
to year. The Company's exposure to foreign currency fluctuations are not
material as Comet requires sales to foreign customers to be priced in U.S.
dollars and payable by irrevocable letters of credit by a major bank prior to
shipment. Additional material business risks relating to export sales are
discussed under "Competition" and "Significant Business Factors."
Export sales in 1993 reflect a substantial decline in dollars and cwt. compared
to 1992 and 1991. During the three years ended March 31, 1993, Comet's export
sales by geographical area were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31
----------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Export sales
Middle East $46,208 $ 31,181 $ 57,018
Caribbean 11,016 30,355 169
Europe 8,974 15,089 13,161
Africa 2,114 11,380 4,867
Far East 1,193 1,375 5,989
Canada 1,163 3,245 4,737
South America 51 9,953 17,401
Other 8,610 10,139 11,824
------- -------- --------
Total export sales $79,329 $112,717 $115,166
======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
Comet's revenues include export sales to customers in the Middle East of 15%,
9% and 16% of ERLY's total consolidated revenues for the years ended March 31,
1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
In fiscal years 1988 to 1991, Comet's largest customer in the Middle East was
Iraq. Sales to Iraq were made directly to the Iraqi Grain Board, the official
buying agency for the Iraq government, or through a United States grain
exporter. Comet's sales to Iraq were $21.5 million for the year ended March
31, 1991, accounting for 10% of all Comet sales during that year. All Iraq
sales were made using credit guaranties by the U.S. Government through the GSM
102 and 103 Programs. In August 1990, the U.S. Government discontinued
extending such credit guaranties for rice exports to Iraq and imposed a total
embargo against any trade with Iraq. Consequently, Comet has exported no rice
to Iraq since June 30, 1990 and the volume and profitability of export sales
have been adversely affected from fiscal year 1991 through fiscal year 1993.
For fiscal year 1993, Middle East sales were up from fiscal year 1992
reflecting increased sales to Turkey which were aided by the U.S. Government
Export Enhancement Program ("EEP").
For fiscal 1991, export sales included sales to countries such as Brazil, Ivory
Coast and Peru. In fiscal 1992, sales to these countries were largely replaced
with sales to the Caribbean and African markets. The decline in fiscal 1993
export sales to all areas except the Middle East reflects a more selective
acceptance of export contracts as a result of the smaller milling capacity to
be filled after the disposition of the Greenville, Mississippi mill. Export
sales to specific geographical areas are largely unpredictable unless some type
of franchise is enjoyed in a specific area. Acceptance of contracts is
generally based on expected profit margin available which changes annually in
all geographical areas due to many factors including, but limited to, crop size
by country, world demand and governmental support or restrictions. A
consistent pattern of sales by geographical area should therefore not be
expected.
6
<PAGE> 9
COMPETITION
Domestic. Comet buys a substantial portion of its rough rice requirements
through competitive bidding. In California, some rice is purchased under
contracts requiring payment of current government loan redemption value upon
delivery with an additional premium payable at crop year end. Price,
promotional allowances and product quality are important competitive factors at
the sales level. Although one of the largest rice millers in the United
States, Comet faces competition from several other sizeable rice processing
companies that have equal or substantially greater resources to expend in
marketing their rice products. Principal competitors, some of which have
greater financial resources than the Company, include Riceland Foods, Inc. (an
Arkansas cooperative), Uncle Ben's Inc. (a subsidiary of Mars, Inc.), Riviana
Foods, Inc. and Farmers Rice (a California cooperative).
Foreign. The United States has historically been one of the largest exporters
of rice in the world. However, while Comet considers itself a low-cost
producer and a diversified seller, it may not always be able to sell at
profitable prices in world markets where Comet faces worldwide competition.
The competitiveness of Comet's prices is critically affected by factors that
are difficult to predict, such as the value of the dollar relative to the
currencies of other rice-producing and rice-importing nations, and the sizes of
foreign and domestic rice crops. As the size of the foreign crop increases,
the prices for foreign rice tend to decline, and more foreign buyers are able
to satisfy their rice requirements in foreign markets at prices lower than
Comet's. The adverse effect of a large foreign harvest may be aggravated when
domestic rice crops decline, since smaller domestic crops tend to escalate
Comet's cost of rough rice. Conversely, as the size of the foreign crop
decreases and the size of the domestic crop increases, Comet's ability to
compete in foreign markets improves.
SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS FACTORS
General. Comet regards itself as a rice processing and marketing company.
Rice, because it can be easily stored and remain within the U.S. Government's
loan program, is purchased and processed throughout the year. Prices for rough
rice vary due to changes in supply and demand in the U.S. and the world market.
These changes occur throughout the year and are not based on predictable
seasonal factors. Working capital requirements vary based on sales
requirements and price volatility and do not generally change based on
seasonality.
Generally, it is Comet's policy to purchase rough rice to meet identified
export sales requirements and to satisfy the stable and relatively predictable
domestic demand for its rice products. However, Comet may purchase rice in
excess of sales orders received, or accept orders in excess of available
inventory, and consequently, its profits could be substantially affected by
rapidly changing rough rice costs or processed rice selling prices.
Utilization of plant capacity also influences operating profitability. Since
Comet has a substantial investment in its operating facilities, under normal
circumstances a high volume of business is necessary to recover its fixed costs
and achieve profitability. Because rough rice prices vary from time to time
within the crop year, the timing of Comet's rough rice purchases for its
domestic requirements affects the profitability of its domestic rice business.
The profitability of Comet's export activities is also related to the cost and
availability of domestic rice in relation to world demand and price levels.
7
<PAGE> 10
Import and Other Restrictions. Some foreign countries prohibit the importation
of rice; other foreign countries which currently import Comet rice impose
import quotas, levies or other restrictions on the importation of rice from the
United States.
Farm Bill. The adoption of the Food Security Act of 1985 opened world markets
to U.S. rice millers and generally resulted in increased throughput from higher
domestic and export sales beginning in April 1986. The legislation provides
subsidies to rice producers so that rice can be milled at prices expected to be
competitive in the world market.
The Food Security Act of 1985 was originally only applicable to crops produced
through 1990, however, its applicability has been extended to crops produced
through 1995. There is no assurance that the currently favorable provisions
under this legislation will be extended into future periods or will not be
amended due to budgetary or other governmental constraints.
U.S. Government Export Programs. The U.S. Government offers a variety of
export programs such as GSM and EEP to increase the competitiveness of U.S.
rice in export markets. GSM programs provide long-term credit to foreign
countries to purchase U.S. rice. EEP bonus programs provide subsidies to U.S.
companies in markets where European export competitors are subsidized by
European governments.
IMPORTANCE OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND FRANCHISES HELD
Comet holds patents, trademarks, licenses or franchises that provide a
competitive advantage in the rice industry. Its Green Peacock, Colusa and
Autumn Harvest brands are important trademarks in the Asian trade. Its "Comet"
brand is used in export sales as well as domestic sales in the Western United
States. For the balance of the country, ARI owns all of the Comet and ARI
brands for domestic sale (other than rights retained by Comet for
California-grown rice). These brands and trademarks are significant and have
substantial value.
ERLY JUICE INC.
ERLY Juice is a subsidiary of ERLY Industries that was formed in 1988 to
purchase the assets of the Citrus Division of Kraft, Inc. and the assets of the
TreeSweet Companies. In addition, in early 1989, ERLY Industries bought the
stock of Worldmark, Inc., which owned two plants located in Eau Claire,
Michigan. These acquisitions included a large well-maintained juice plant in
Lakeland, Florida capable of extracting, concentrating, blending, freezing and
storing juices from fresh oranges and grapefruits. The Lakeland plant, as well
as the two plants in Eau Claire, Michigan, are capable of packing juices and
non-carbonated drinks, as well as frozen concentrated citrus juices, in various
sizes of glass, cartons and can containers.
The acquisition of the assets from the TreeSweet Companies included the
valuable trademarks of "TreeSweet", "Awake" and "Orange Plus". ERLY Juice now
maintains a nationwide market in these brands, as well as supplying private
label juice to major retailers. The Company also has contracts to pack fruit
juices and non-carbonated drinks for six major beverage companies in the United
States.
8
<PAGE> 11
In January 1993, ERLY Juice sold its wholly owned subsidiary, TreeSweet of
Puerto Rico, Inc., to a group of private investors in Puerto Rico. ERLY Juice
will no longer have sales in the Puerto Rican market which historically has
accounted for about 10% and 15% of ERLY Juice's sales and gross profit,
respectively. In July 1993, its Lakeland, Florida plant was sold to Florida
Juice, Inc., a Florida company owned by a group led by a major grove owner.
ERLY Juice will continue to use the Lakeland facility, as well as other
non-owned plants throughout the country, as co-packers for its retail and food
service business. ERLY Juice operated the Lakeland, Florida plant at less than
full capacity. Management believes that by selling the plant and contracting
for the same services with the purchaser of the facility, ERLY Juice will
convert its processing and packaging costs to copacking fees which should
result in cost savings when compared to its operational expenses attributable
to the Lakeland facility. As a result of the sale, ERLY Juice will not own any
processing or packing capacity in Florida. The Company believes that there is
sufficient excess capacity in the industry to process and pack its product at
comparable rates if access to the Lakeland facility is interrupted. The
disposition will enable ERLY Juice to focus its limited financial resources on
the sales and marketing functions associated with the TreeSweet label (See Note
21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
For the years ended March 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, ERLY Juice reported sales of
$82 million, $96 million and $106 million, respectively.
SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS FACTORS
Florida citrus products are processed from November through March of each year.
Working capital needs increase during this time period due to higher operating
costs associated primarily with increased labor expenses, utility costs and raw
product purchases. The impact of the latter is reduced by raw product purchase
contracts which provide for raw product payments over a twelve month period as
well as purchases of bulk concentrate during the year. Sales for citrus based
products have only minor seasonal impacts.
ERLY Juice has purchased a substantial portion of its orange and grapefruit
requirements from growers in Florida through one-year contracts. This results
in a considerable risk of local freezes, curtailing the availability of juice
and escalating costs. Through the sale of the Lakeland facility, the Company
has substantially reduced its risk because it will be better able to expand its
economical sources for juice to include not only Florida but California, Mexico
and Brazil.
ERLY Juice sells and markets its products through an internal sales force and
broker network to distributors and directly to large grocery chains. The
ability to compete is impacted by the size and effectiveness of its sales
force.
COMPETITION
ERLY Juice sells primarily through its "TreeSweet," "Awake," and "Orange Plus"
trademarks. The Company's competition is significantly larger than ERLY Juice
in most of its markets and has substantially greater resources to expend in
marketing their juice products. Principal competitors include Minute Maid (a
subsidiary of Coca Cola, Inc.) and Tropicana (a subsidiary of Seagram's, Inc.)
both of which have greater financial resources than the Company.
9
<PAGE> 12
CHEMONICS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Chemonics Industries, Inc. is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona from where it
administrates its two divisions. Chemonics' international consulting
activities are coordinated from its Washington, D.C. office. Chemonics also
maintains facilities in Northern California and Western Canada from which fire
retardant chemicals are manufactured and sold. Chemonics' sales in each of the
Company's last three fiscal years were $49,814,000 (1993), $41,198,000 (1992)
and $33,859,000 (1991).
Chemonics International offers technical assistance and related services to
developing countries worldwide under contracts with the Agency for
International Development (AID), the World Bank, and other international
development agencies as well as private firms. Services are provided in a
range of areas including agriculture, agribusiness, natural resources and the
environment, and rural development. A major focus is development of private
enterprise, especially in countries where government controlled enterprise once
dominated. Agriculture and agribusiness assistance provides for a potentially
close working relationship with other companies in the ERLY group. Chemonics
International has recently added a trade and investment office in Miami,
Florida.
The division has 30 long-term contracts, 26 of which are based overseas and 4
in Washington, D.C., which are regional or worldwide in scope. Countries or
regions with the largest amount of business include Egypt, Oman, Central
America, the Caribbean, the Philippines, Nepal, Pakistan, South Africa,
Botswana, Swaziland and Burundi. In addition, an office has been opened in
Budapest to support efforts to develop markets in Eastern Europe and the
countries of the former Soviet Union.
At March 31, 1993, Chemonics International has a contract backlog of
approximately $143 million, covering 1994 through 1999. Of this amount, $41
million relates to services expected to be provided in fiscal year 1994.
Contracts are subject to cancellation in the event of severe political turmoil
in the country or region, subject to appropriate compensation for wind-down.
Contracted projects can be cancelled although it has rarely happened.
Chemonics' ability to enforce contractual commitments is limited due to AID
being an agency of the U.S. Government. Revenues for 1993 were $37,185,000, a
20% increase over prior year. Revenues were $31,035,000 in 1992, up 52% from
1991 revenues of $20,414,000.
The primary product of the Company's fire retardant business is Fire-Trol, a
patented, United States Forest Service tested and qualified material which is
designed to combat forest, brush and grass fires through dissemination from
tanker airplanes. The chemical and other components of Fire-Trol are generally
available throughout the year. Manufactured at Chemonics' three processing
centers in Orland, California; Kamloops, British Columbia; and Edmonton,
Alberta, Fire-Trol is available throughout all major forest fire areas in North
America. It is distributed in Canada through Chemonics' Canadian subsidiary,
Chemonics Industries (Canada) Ltd. The major customers of Fire-Trol are the
United States and Canadian governments. The Company is in the process of
developing the overseas market for Fire-Trol and has established operations in
France, Portugal, Italy and South America.
Chemonics holds significant patents for Fire-Trol (which expire in various
years through the year 2000), but it faces substantial competition in its fire
retardant business from Monsanto Chemical Company, a corporation with far
greater resources than the Company. Annual sales of Fire-Trol fluctuate
according to the number and severity of forest fires in the geographical areas
serviced by
10
<PAGE> 13
Chemonics. The primary fire season is from June to October. Consequently,
most of Fire-Trol's sales occur during this period. Working capital
requirements are consequently higher during these time periods due to increased
short-term borrowing and due to maintenance of higher inventory levels.
Revenues were $12,629,000, $10,163,000 and $13,445,000 in 1993, 1992 and 1991,
respectively. This volume variation, based primarily on weather and fire
location, is an important aspect of Chemonics' overall sales and profitability.
KASCO MEDIA TRADING COMPANY
The Company formed a joint venture called Kasco Media Trading Company ("Kasco")
in January 1987. Kasco provided a service for major companies to dispose of
surplus goods in exchange for attractively priced media advertising. Effective
March 31, 1991, ERLY sold its interest in Kasco to its joint venture partner.
This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $3,000,000 in fiscal year 1991.
Kasco operated profitably on revenues of $8.7 million for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 1991.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
THE BEVERAGE SOURCE
The Beverage Source ("TBS") is classified as a discontinued operation for
financial reporting purposes. In fiscal year 1990, all of its wine brands and
labels were sold in separate transactions. The direct sales force, main office
and bottling operations were shut down. The remaining wine business was a
streamlined bulk wine processing operation utilizing two wineries at Sanger and
Tulare, California. In June 1992, the winery at Sanger was sold. Management
will continue to consider and evaluate opportunities to dispose of the
remaining assets of TBS in an orderly manner.
EMPLOYEES
The Company employs approximately 919 people full-time in continuing
operations, of which 665 are in the food processing business. None of the
Company's operations are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
All eligible employees of the Company are covered by a profit sharing
retirement plan and a group insurance plan providing life insurance, medical,
dental and hospitalization benefits. Annual contributions to the profit
sharing retirement plan are solely at the discretion of the Board of Directors
of the Company.
11
<PAGE> 14
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table summarizes the principal properties owned and/or occupied
by the Company and its subsidiaries:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Approximate Owned or Leased-
Square Footage of Expiration Date of
Location Buildings Lease
- - - --------------------- ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
- - - ---------------------
Administrative offices:
Los Angeles, California 11,086 sq. ft. Leased 1996
Houston, Texas 24,566 sq. ft. Leased 1997
Phoenix, Arizona 10,300 sq. ft. Leased 2002
Washington, D.C. 27,270 sq. ft. Leased 1999
Washington, D.C. 11,314 sq. ft. Leased 1996
Washington, D.C. 6,830 sq. ft. Leased 1993
Washington, D.C. 4,796 sq. ft. Leased 1993
Washington, D.C. 4,190 sq. ft. Leased 1994
Miami, Florida 1,785 sq. ft. Leased 1996
Processing and shipping of
rice and rice products:
Stuttgart, Arkansas 142,900 sq. ft. Owned
Maxwell, California 124,500 sq. ft. Owned
Arecibo, Puerto Rico (1) 55,000 sq. ft. Leased 1992
Aqaba, Jordan (2) 5,000 sq. ft. Owned
Purchasing, drying and
storage of rough rice prior
to processing:
Maxwell, California 136,500 sq. ft. Leased 2034
Harrisburg, Arkansas (2) 55,000 sq. ft. Owned
Greenville, Mississippi 10,000 sq. ft. Leased 1994
Juice processing plants:
Lakeland, Florida (3) 213,493 sq. ft. Owned
Eau Claire, Michigan 100,266 sq. ft. Owned
Eau Claire, Michigan 83,970 sq. ft. Owned
Processing, warehousing and
shipping of fire retardants:
Phoenix, Arizona 20,600 sq. ft. Leased 2002
Orland, California 20,000 sq. ft. Owned
Kamloops, British Columbia,
Canada 10,000 sq. ft. Leased 2016
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 4,800 sq. ft. Leased 1993
</TABLE>
(1) Closed September 1992.
(2) Sold April 1993.
(3) Sold July 1993.
12
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Approximate Owned or Leased-
Square Footage of Expiration Date of
Location Buildings Lease
- - - ------------------------ ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
- - - -----------------------
Grape crushing, fermenting,
processing, and warehousing
of wine:
Tulare, California 49,000 sq. ft. Owned
Delano, California* 121,000 sq. ft. Owned
</TABLE>
*Leased to a third party.
All properties owned or leased by the Company are maintained in good repair,
and management believes them to be adequate for their respective purposes. All
machinery and equipment are considered to be in sound and efficient operating
condition. Facilities reflected as discontinued operations above are
classified as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets.
Substantially all property, plant and equipment detailed above (in addition to
all receivables, inventories and the capital stock of Comet Rice, Inc., ERLY
Juice Inc., Chemonics Industries, Inc., and American Rice, Inc.) are pledged as
collateral on notes payable and certain other long-term obligations.
As a result of the sale of the Greenville rice facility, Comet's rice
processing capacity was reduced by approximately 40%. Currently, excess
capacity in its Stuttgart facility and ARI's Freeport facility provides
sufficient processing so that the effective reduction in processing at current
utilization rates will be limited to less than 15%.
Utilization of Rice Processing Capacity
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FY 1992 FY 1993
------- -------
(Before (After
Greenville Greenville
Sale) Sale)
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Greenville 80% N/A
Stuttgart 25% 98%
Maxwell 65% 75%
Total Comet 65% 80%
Freeport 70% 85%
Total Comet and ARI 66% 82%
</TABLE>
The sale of the Aqaba Packaging Company in April 1993 is not expected to effect
Comet's sales as the plant was operating at less than ten percent of capacity.
The sale of the Lakeland juice facility eliminates ERLY Juice's ownership of
processing capacity and ninety percent of its ownership in packaging capacity.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through a solicitation
of proxies or otherwise, since the last Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on
November 20, 1992.
13
<PAGE> 16
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(A) MARKET INFORMATION
The Company's common stock was listed in the National Market Issue Section of
the Over-the-Counter Market as ERLY Industries Inc. - NASDAQ Symbol "ERLY"
through July 1993. Due to non-compliance with NASDAQ's minimum capital
requirement, ERLY was removed from the National Market Issue Section of NASDAQ
and trading in its stock is currently handled through security dealers who act
as market makers for ERLY stock.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fiscal Year 1993
High $3-3/8 $2-5/8 $4-1/4 $4-3/4
Low 1-7/8 1-1/2 1-1/2 2-7/8
Fiscal Year 1992
High $8-1/2 $7-1/4 $6-1/4 $4-1/2
Low 6-7/8 5-1/2 3-3/8 2-7/8
</TABLE>
(B) HOLDERS
There were 1,135 shareholders of record as of June 30, 1993.
(C) DIVIDENDS
The Company has never paid any cash dividends on ERLY Common Stock and has no
present intention to declare or pay cash dividends on the Common Stock in the
foreseeable future. The Company intends to retain any earnings which it may
realize in the foreseeable future to finance its operations.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There have been no disagreements on accounting or financial disclosures to
report.
14
<PAGE> 17
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following is a list of the directors of ERLY Industries Inc. with
information provided as of June 30, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date Elected
as Director
Name of Director Age of Company
- - - ---------------- --- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Gerald D. Murphy 65 April 1964
</TABLE>
Mr. Murphy is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and is Vice Chairman of the Board of American Rice, Inc. (which is 81% owned by
ERLY effective May 1993). He also serves as a Director of Pinkerton's, Inc., a
security and investigation services firm, and High Resolution Sciences, Inc., a
technological corporation.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Douglas A. Murphy 37 January 1988
</TABLE>
Mr. Murphy is President (since 1990) and Chief Operating Officer (since 1992)
of ERLY Industries Inc., President of ERLY Juice Inc. (since 1988), a
subsidiary of the Company, and President, Chief Executive Officer (since 1993)
and Director (since 1990) of American Rice, Inc. He was President of Comet
American Marketing, a division of American Rice, Inc. from 1986 to 1990. He is
also a Director of Compass Bank Houston.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
William H. Burgess 76 September 1975
</TABLE>
Mr. Burgess is a private business consultant, Chairman of CMS Digital, Inc., a
privately held company, and a Director of American Rice, Inc. From 1978 to
1986 Mr. Burgess was Chairman of International Controls Corp., an
internationally diversified manufacturing company.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Bill J. McFarland 56 August 1986
</TABLE>
Mr. McFarland is Vice President of the Company (since 1975), President of ERLY
Food Group (since 1990), President of Comet American Marketing (since 1993) and
Senior Vice President of American Rice, Inc. (since 1993). He was formerly
President of The Beverage Source (from 1979 to 1990) and President of Early
California Foods from 1975 until its sale in 1985 (both subsidiaries of the
Company).
15
<PAGE> 18
The following is a list of the executive officers of ERLY Industries Inc.,
their ages and their positions as of June 30, 1993:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Gerald D. Murphy 65 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of ERLY Industries since formation of the
Company in 1964 and President of the Company from 1964 to 1990; and Vice Chairman of the
Board of American Rice, Inc.
Douglas A. Murphy 37 President since 1990 and Chief Operating Officer since 1992 of ERLY Industries; President of
ERLY Juice Inc. since 1988; President and Chief Executive Officer since 1993 and Director
since 1990 of American Rice, Inc.; and President of Comet American Marketing from 1986 to
1990.
Bill J. McFarland 56 Vice President of the Company since 1975; President of ERLY Food Group from 1990; President
of Comet American Marketing since 1993; Senior Vice President of American Rice, Inc. since
1993; President of The Beverage Source from 1979 to 1990; and President of Early California
Foods from 1975 until its sale in 1985.
Richard N. McCombs 47 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 1990; Executive Vice
President of Finance and Administration, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of American Rice,
Inc. since 1993; President of ISC Wines of California from 1984 to 1986; and Executive Vice
President of The Beverage Source from 1986 to 1990 and President since 1990.
Kurt A. Grey 52 Vice President of the Company since 1982; President, Cicero Industries (a manufacturer of
speaker systems) from 1981 to 1982; and Vice President, Union Bank, from 1976 to 1981.
Lolan M. Pullen 59 Vice President of the Company since 1986; Vice President of Comet Rice, Inc. since 1986; and
Vice President - Finance of Early California Foods from 1976 until its sale in 1985.
Thomas A. Whitlock 43 Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Company since 1991; and Vice President and
Controller of The Beverage Source from 1987 to 1990.
</TABLE>
Douglas A. Murphy, President of ERLY Industries Inc., ERLY Juice Inc. and
American Rice, Inc., is the son of Gerald D. Murphy, Chairman of the Board of
the Company. There are no other family relationships among the directors or
executive officers of the Company.
16
<PAGE> 19
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information for each of the three fiscal
years ended March 31, 1993 for the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company and
its subsidiaries:
COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-term
Compen-
Annual Compensation sation
----------------------- --------
Fiscal Other All
Year Annual Other
Name and ended Compen- Options Compen-
Principal Position March 31 Salary Bonus sation (#) sation
- - - ------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(1) (2)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Gerald D. Murphy 1993 $280,000 $ - $3,284 -0- $6,650
Chairman of the 1992 290,000 - (3) -0- (3)
Board and Chief 1991 275,000 61,500 (3) -0- (3)
Executive Officer
Douglas A. Murphy 1993 195,000 - 6,695 -0- 5,143
President, ERLY 1992 200,000 - (3) -0- (3)
Industries Inc. 1991 190,000 51,250 (3) -0- (3)
and ERLY Juice Inc.
Bill J. McFarland 1993 185,000 - 2,670 -0- 3,700
President, ERLY 1992 190,000 - (3) -0- (3)
Food Group 1991 180,000 30,500 (3) -0- (3)
Frank M. Feffer 1993 150,000 - 6,272 -0- -0-
President, Chemonics 1992 150,000 47,500 (3) -0- (3)
Industries, Inc. 1991 144,000 - (3) -0- (3)
Richard N. McCombs 1993 140,000 10,000 1,933 -0- 4,399
Vice President and 1992 140,000 - (3) -0- (3)
Chief Financial 1991 130,000 35,875 (3) -0- (3)
Officer
</TABLE>
_____________
(1) Amounts included in this column reflect: (i) the cost of Company
provided automobiles relating to personal use, and (ii) reimbursements
under the Company's Executive Medical Plan. Under the Plan, key
executive officers of the Company are entitled to be reimbursed for
expenses incurred for medical and dental care provided to the key
executive officer and his dependents which are not otherwise covered
by other sources.
(2) Amounts include Company contributions under the ERLY Industries Inc.
Employees Profit Sharing Retirement Plan.
(3) Disclosure not required by applicable transition rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
17
<PAGE> 20
In 1982, the Board of Directors adopted an Incentive Stock Option
Plan, which was subsequently approved by the shareholders. On June 18, 1982,
the Board granted options to key management employees for 80,525 shares (as
adjusted for stock dividends), including 20,131 shares each to Messrs. Gerald
D. Murphy and McFarland. The option price for Mr. McFarland was $4.35 per
share, being equal to the market value as of date of grant (as adjusted for
subsequent stock dividends). Mr. Gerald D. Murphy's option price was $5.26 per
share or 110% of the market value at date of grant, since Mr. Gerald D. Murphy
holds more than 10% of the outstanding stock of the Company. Mr. Murphy
exercised all of his options in 1988.
On March 31, 1983, the Board granted options for 67,639 shares (as
adjusted for stock dividends) to key management employees. The option price
was $4.78 per share, being equal to the market value at date of grant.
On March 31, 1985, the Board granted options for 16,105 shares (as
adjusted for stock dividends), including 8,053 shares to Mr. McFarland, at an
option price of $3.73 per share, the market price at date of grant.
On March 22, 1988, the Board granted options for 124,448 shares (as
adjusted for stock dividends), including 26,620 shares to Mr. McFarland and
66,550 shares to Mr. Douglas A. Murphy at an option price of $4.51 per share,
the market price at date of grant.
Options may be exercised over a maximum period of ten years, except
that Mr. Gerald D. Murphy was required to exercise his option within a five
year period, with exercise rights accruing at the rate of 25% of the total
grant per year beginning one year from date of grant. An employee pays no
federal income tax when an option is granted or when shares are purchased under
the option, nor does the Company obtain the benefit of a tax deduction at such
times. Applicable federal income taxes, if any, payable by the employee are
deferred until the shares are sold.
As of this date, options for 123,184 shares remain outstanding. The
market value of the Company's common stock at June 30, 1993 was $4.53 per
share, compared to the per share option prices (as adjusted for stock
dividends) of $3.73 to $4.51.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL YEAR 1993
AND MARCH 31, 1993 OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Value of
Number of Unexercised
Unexercised In-The-Money
Options at Options at
Shares March 31, 1993 (#) March 31, 1993 ($)(1)
Acquired on Value -------------------------- --------------------------
Exercise (#) Realized ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
------------ ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Gerald D. Murphy - - - - - -
Douglas A. Murphy - - 66,550 - - -
Bill J. McFarland - - 34,673 - - -
Frank M. Feffer - - - - - -
Richard N. McCombs - - - - - -
</TABLE>
(1) Market value of underlying securities at March 31, 1993, less the exercise
price.
18
<PAGE> 21
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS
AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Decisions on the compensation of the Company's executive officers are made
by the Compensation Committee which was composed of three directors during
fiscal 1993; Mr. William H. Burgess, Chairman, Mr. Gerald D. Murphy and Dr.
William M. Duke (until his death in October 1992). Mr. Burgess is a private
business consultant, Chairman of CMS Digital, Inc. and a Director of American
Rice, Inc. He is the beneficial owner of 8.9% of the Company's common stock.
Mr. Murphy is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and is the
beneficial owner of 41.5% of the Company's common stock. Dr. Duke was Chairman
of Cathwill Corp. and a Director of Arrays, Inc.
All decisions by the Compensation Committee were reviewed and approved
without change, by the full Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Murphy did
not participate in any Compensation Committee or Board of Directors discussions
or decisions concerning his own compensation. Except for Mr. Murphy, who is
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, no other member of the Compensation
Committee is now or ever has been an officer or employee of the Company or its
subsidiaries. Mr. Burgess and Mr. Murphy are also Directors of American Rice,
Inc. Both serve on ARI's Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,
with Mr. Murphy as Chairman of the Committee.
For information concerning certain other relationships of Mr. Gerald D.
Murphy with ERLY Industries, see Item 13. - "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" below.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee reviews and sets the compensation levels of
members of management. It is responsible for the administration of the
Company's various compensation plans including annual salaries and bonuses, the
stock option plan, the ERLY Industries Inc. Employees Profit Sharing and
Retirement Plan and other benefits provided to executives.
Base salary levels for the executives of the Company and its subsidiaries
are set annually relative to salaries paid at other companies of comparable
size and complexity. Annual salary increases and bonuses paid are based on the
executive's performance and the performance of the Company and the subsidiary
or operating unit to which the executive is assigned.
In view of the disappointing financial results reported by the Company for
fiscal year 1992, Mr. Gerald D. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer, received a
3.4% lower salary in fiscal 1993 as compared to fiscal 1992. Substantially all
other executives' salaries were frozen in 1993 at their 1992 levels, and in
some cases were reduced.
The Company also has an Incentive Stock Option Plan, as described under
"Executive Compensation" which authorizes the issuance of stock options. No
options have been granted under the Plan in the last three fiscal years. The
Company provides insured medical benefits to executive officers that are
generally available to all full-time employees of the Company. Executive
officers also are eligible to participate in the ERLY Industries Inc. Employees
Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan on the same basis as all other eligible
employees of the Company. The Company provides additional benefits to
executive officers through executive medical coverage and company provided
automobiles.
19
<PAGE> 22
Amounts paid in fiscal 1993 under the above described plans and programs for
the Chief Executive Officer and the four most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company and its subsidiaries are included in the compensation
table and related footnotes presented in the "Executive Compensation" section.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
William H. Burgess, Chairman
Gerald D. Murphy
20
<PAGE> 23
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE
The graph below compares the cumulative total return on the Company's
Common Stock with the cumulative total return of (i) the Total Return Index for
the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S. companies) Index, and (ii) the Total Return Index
for Standard and Poor's Food Industry Companies. The comparison covers the
five-year period from April 1, 1988 to March 31, 1993, the end of ERLY's 1993
fiscal year and assumes that $100 was invested at the beginning of the period
in ERLY Common Stock and in each index.
The stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily
indicative of future price performance.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total Return S & P
for the Food
ERLY NASDAQ Stock Products
Industries Market - Companies
Measurement Period Inc. U.S. Companies Index
- - - ------------------ ---------- -------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
At March 31, 1988 $100 $100 $100
FYE March 31, 1989 106 112 134
FYE March 31, 1990 151 122 161
FYE March 31, 1991 148 140 220
FYE March 31, 1992 69 180 240
FYE March 31, 1993 65 205 263
</TABLE>
21
<PAGE> 24
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Officers and directors of the Company are required to file initial reports
of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has reviewed such reports
received by it and believes that during the fiscal year ended March 31, 1993
its officers and directors complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing
requirements, except for the following: Annual Form 5 reports are to be filed
with the SEC within 45 days after fiscal year end. Form 5's for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1993 were filed to report exempt transactions under
Section 16(b) of the Act for the following officers: G.D. Murphy, D.A. Murphy,
B.J. McFarland, R.N. McCombs and J.S. Poole. Such reports were filed in June
1993, subsequent to the May 15 due date, and therefore were not timely filed.
The Board of Directors has four committees with specific responsibilities
to support the operations of the full Board. These are the Executive
Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Stock Option Plan
Committee and the Profit Sharing Plan Committee. The Board of Directors does
not have a Nominating Committee, as the entire Board acts in this capacity.
Members of the Board of Directors who are not officers of the Company are
compensated on the basis of $1,500 per quarter plus a fee of $1,100 for each
meeting attended in person or by telephone. In addition, in fiscal 1993, Mr.
Burgess received fees of $4,500 for public relations services provided to the
Company.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the ownership of the
Company's Common Stock as of June 30, 1993 of (i) each person known to the
Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding
shares of Common Stock; (ii) each director and nominee for director of the
Company; (iii) each executive officer named in the Compensation Table; and (iv)
all directors and executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries as a
group. Except as indicated, each of the stockholders has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by each
stockholder.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and address of Amount and nature of Percent of
beneficial owner beneficial ownership class
---------------------- -------------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Gerald D. Murphy, Chairman 1,487,035 shares 41.5%*
ERLY Industries Inc. Direct (1) and
10990 Wilshire Blvd. Indirect (2)
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Douglas A. Murphy, President 465,939 shares 12.2%*
ERLY Industries Inc. Direct (3)
10990 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90024
William H. Burgess, Director 310,143 shares 8.9%
550 Palisades Drive Direct
Palm Springs, CA 92262
</TABLE>
22
<PAGE> 25
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and address of Amount and nature of Percent of
beneficial owner beneficial ownership class
---------------------- -------------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
State Treasurer of the 302,368 shares 8.7%
State of Michigan Direct
301 W. Allegan Street
Lansing, MI 48922
Gentleness 220,000 shares 6.3%
P.O. Box N7776 Direct (4)
Lyford Cay
Nassau, Bahamas
Bill J. McFarland 40,505 shares 1.2%
ERLY Industries Inc. Direct
10990 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Frank M. Feffer 3,100 shares .1%
ERLY Industries Inc. Direct
10990 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Richard N. McCombs 11,078 shares .3%
ERLY Industries Inc. Direct
10990 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90024
All directors and executive officers
as a group (10 persons) 1,897,526 shares (5) 48.9%
</TABLE>
____________
* All expressions of percentage of shares held assume that
options or convertible notes held by the particular individual
have been exercised or converted, and no others.
(1) Mr. Gerald D. Murphy, Chairman of the Board of the Company, is
the record holder of 1,016,949 shares and has the right to
acquire an additional 154 shares pursuant to the conversion
features of a note receivable from the Company with a
principal balance of $857 described under "Transactions with
Management" in this Proxy Statement.
(2) Mr. Gerald D. Murphy's indirect beneficial ownership
represents 469,932 shares owned (1) directly by his son
Douglas A. Murphy, President of the Company, and (2) held in
trust for his grandson. Of this total, Gerald D. Murphy has
voting control of the 3,993 shares held in trust for his
grandson, however, he denies holding voting or investment
control of the balance of the 465,939 shares owned directly by
his son, Douglas A. Murphy.
(3) Mr. Douglas A. Murphy, President of the Company, is the record
holder of 132,793 shares and has the right to acquire an
additional 66,550 shares pursuant to options granted under the
1982 Incentive Stock Option Plan described under "Executive
Compensation." In addition, Mr. D.A. Murphy has the right to
acquire an additional 266,596 shares pursuant to the
conversion features of a $1,000,000 note receivable from the
Company described under "Transactions With Management" in this
Proxy Statement.
23
<PAGE> 26
(4) Based upon Schedule 13D filed as of October 30, 1992 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Gentleness is an Isle of
Man Corporation indirectly controlled by John M. Templeton.
Mr. Templeton may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the
shares of ERLY owned by Gentleness by virtue of his ability to
direct the voting or disposition of such shares.
(5) All directors and officers as a group owned of record or
beneficially 1,897,526 shares, representing 48.9% of the
Company's issued and outstanding voting securities. This
includes stock options held by officers to purchase 123,184
shares under the Company's Incentive Stock Option Plan and
266,750 shares issuable pursuant to notes payable by the
Company described under "Transactions With Management."
Mr. Gerald D. Murphy has pledged 431,805 shares of his ERLY Industries
stock as collateral for personal loans totalling $664,000 from three financial
institutions (see "Transactions with Management").
Mr. Douglas A. Murphy has pledged 174,375 shares of ERLY Industries
stock as collateral for personal loans totalling $482,500 from two financial
institutions.
As discussed in Item 1. - "Business - Combination with American Rice,
Inc." ERLY Industries holds 81% of the combined voting power of ARI stock
outstanding subsequent to the May 26, 1993 transaction. ERLY's ownership in
ARI consists of 3,888,889 shares of the ARI Common Stock, 3,888,889 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock (which is convertible into ARI Common Stock), and
14,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (which is convertible into ARI
Common Stock). Because of their positions as directors and significant
shareholders of ERLY Industries, Messrs. Gerald Murphy, Douglas Murphy, and
Burgess could be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the ARI stock owned by
ERLY Industries.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In March 1987, the Company loaned $20.5 million to Hansen Foods, Inc.
(the "Hansen Note"). Mr. Gerald D. Murphy, Chairman of the Board of ERLY
Industries Inc., loaned the Company $1.2 million (the "Murphy Note") to help
finance the Company's loan to Hansen Foods represented by the Hansen Note. The
Murphy Note provided for interest at the prime rate plus 4.5%.
Hansen Foods defaulted in its payments on the Hansen Note in March
1988. In November 1988, Hansen Foods filed for protection from its creditors
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. A sale of the assets of Hansen Foods
was completed in January 1990 after approval by the Bankruptcy Court. The sale
provided funds to satisfy the secured obligations of third party creditors
involved in the financing of the Hansen Note, but did not provide sufficient
funds to pay the Murphy Note. Mr. G.D. Murphy received total principal
payments of $11,868 in 1988 on the Murphy Note.
On January 1, 1990, the Murphy Note was canceled in exchange for two
convertible promissory notes with face amounts of $1,000,000 and $296,000.
These notes bore interest at the prime rate plus 2% and were due in full on
January 1, 1993. These notes were convertible at any time into ERLY Industries
common shares at a conversion price of $5.57 per share, the market price on
January 1, 1990 (as adjusted for a 10% stock dividend in September 1990).
24
<PAGE> 27
In April 1992, Mr. Gerald D. Murphy sold the $1.0 million note to his son,
Douglas A. Murphy. In fiscal 1993, G.D. Murphy received principal payments of
$215,000 and interest payments of $43,000 on the original $296,000 note. The
principal balance remaining on this note at March 31, 1993 was $857. Mr.
Douglas Murphy renewed the $1.0 million note on April 1, 1993. The new note
bears interest at the prime rate plus 2%, is due in full on April 1, 1994, and
may be converted at any time into ERLY Industries common shares at a conversion
price of $3.75 per share, the average market price of ERLY stock for the seven
trading days immediately prior to the renewal date of the note.
As of March 31, 1993, ERLY Corporate had an intercompany payable of $12.1
million to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Comet Rice, Inc. As part of the
Transaction described in Item 1. - "Business - Combination with American Rice,
Inc.", this receivable was transferred to American Rice when it received
substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Comet Rice in conjunction
with the Transaction. This receivable was reduced by ERLY's issuance of a $3
million term note to ARI's former term lenders.
25
<PAGE> 28
PART IV
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
Number
------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(a) 1. Financial Statements
--------------------
Selected Financial Data 29
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 31-41
Consolidated Statements of Operations 42
Consolidated Balance Sheets 43
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 44-45
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity 46
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 47-73
Independent Auditors' Report 74
2. Financial Statement Schedules
-----------------------------
Schedule III - Condensed Financial
Information of ERLY Industries Inc.
(Parent Only) 75-77
Schedule V - Property, Plant and Equipment 78
Schedule VI - Accumulated Depreciation,
Depletion and Amortization of Property,
Plant and Equipment 79
Schedule VIII - Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts 80
Schedule X - Supplementary Income Statement
Information 81
</TABLE>
All other schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not
required under the instructions or the information is included in
the financial statements and schedules of the registrant.
26
<PAGE> 29
PART IV
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(CONTINUED)
3. Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Exhibit
Number Description Reference
------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
(3) Articles of Incorporation and
By-Laws (as amended) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Company's Form 10, filed on
August 29, 1969, File No. 1-7894).
(4) The Indenture dated as of December 1,
1978 for $20 million 12-1/2% Subordinated
Sinking Fund Debentures due 1993 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 2(b) to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-7, filed December 6, 1978, Registration
No. 2-62870).
(11) Calculations of Primary and Fully Exhibit I
Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share.
(22) Subsidiaries of ERLY Industries Inc. Exhibit II
(23) Notice of 1993 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement
(incorporated by reference to Proxy filed with the Company's
Form 10-K, filed September 30, 1993, File No. 1-7894).
(28) Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 23, 1993, between and among
American Rice, Inc., Comet Rice, Inc. and ERLY Industries Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1. to the Company's
Form 8-K, filed June 16, 1993, File No. 1-7894).
(28) Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 25, 1993,
between and among American Rice, Inc., Comet Rice, Inc.
and ERLY Industries Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.
to the Company's Form 8-K, filed June 16, 1993, File No. 1-7894).
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE> 30
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
(28) American Rice, Inc. 1993 Annual Report and Form 10-K (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit III to the Company's Form 10-K, filed
September 30, 1993, file No. 1-7894).
</TABLE>
(b) 1. Reports on Form 8-K
-------------------
No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1993. In June 1993, the
Company filed a Form 8-K to report the acquisition of
additional stock in American Rice, Inc. and the related
increase in ERLY's voting interest from 48% to 81%.
28
<PAGE> 31
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31: 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993* Pro Forma
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(In thousands except 1993
per share data) (unaudited
- Note 3)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales
Comet Rice (1) $233,310 $263,002 $218,919 $214,090 $169,617 $309,160
ERLY Juice (2)(3) 43,851 132,057 105,912 96,386 82,213 82,213
Consulting 14,512 20,611 20,414 31,035 37,185 37,185
Fire-Trol 14,672 9,649 13,445 10,163 12,629 12,629
Other 6,689 6,094 8,697
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total net sales $313,034 $431,413 $367,387 $351,674 $301,644 $441,187
Operating profit (loss)
(before interest expense
and corporate overhead)
Comet Rice $ 10,033 $ 13,849 $ 11,515 $ 4,882 ($ 55) $ 10,203
ERLY Juice 2,483 2,469 1,066 (6,574) (2,889) (2,889)
Consulting 672 1,416 307 1,669 1,536 1,536
Fire-Trol 2,558 370 2,342 623 1,532 1,532
Other 311 (44) (90)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating
profit $ 16,057 $ 18,060 $ 15,140 $ 600 $ 124 $ 10,382
Income (loss) from
continuing operations ($ 3,009) $ 308 $ 1,860 ($ 16,975) ($ 15,961) ($ 3,961)
Net income (loss) ($ 15,041) $ 455 $ 3,260 ($ 12,539) ($ 8,673) $ 4,168
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
per share ($ 1.04) $ .10 $ .61 ($ 5.43) ($ 4.63) ($ 1.15)
Net income (loss) per
common share ($ 5.20) $ .15 $ 1.06 ($ 4.01) ($ 2.52) $ 1.21
Average common shares
outstanding* 2,891,805 3,029,278 3,088,573 3,127,291 3,444,250 3,444,250
Cash dividend per
common share $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Stock dividend issued 10% 10% 10% - - -
At year-end:
Total assets $209,945 $242,139 $225,059 $196,726 $135,100 $238,423
Long-term debt*** $ 82,953 $ 75,668 $ 73,274 $ 64,080 $ 40,565 $ 88,395
Subordinated debt*** $ 16,961 $ 14,122 $ 12,634 $ 11,139 $ 9,941 $ 9,941
Stockholders' equity
(deficiency) $ 8,755 $ 9,759 $ 13,141 $ 21 ($ 9,194) $ 12,356
Shares outstanding** 2,762,378 3,086,744 3,088,731 3,429,513 3,486,956 3,486,956
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE> 32
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (continued)
(1) Rice sales decreased in fiscal 1991 compared to fiscal 1990 primarily
as a result of the embargo of rice sales to Iraq.
(2) Fiscal year 1989 represented the first year of operations of ERLY
Juice. ERLY Juice sales for fiscal 1989 only includes six months of
sales from the Kraft business and one month of sales of the TreeSweet
label.
(3) ERLY Juice sales declined by $2.6 million (20%) from fiscal
1990 to fiscal 1991, due to consumer resistance to price increases
in orange juice resulting from the freeze in December 1989, and
interruptions caused by the transition of the sales force from Kraft
representation to independent food brokers.
* Restated for write-down of investment in ARI attributed to Houston
property (1993) (See Note 22).
** Retroactively adjusted to give effect to a 10% stock dividend in
September 1990, November 1989 and October 1988.
*** Including current portion.
30
<PAGE> 33
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the year ended March 31, 1993, ERLY Industries recorded a net loss of $8.7
million or $2.52 per share of common stock on sales of $302 million. This
compares with a net loss in 1992 of $12.5 million or $4.01 per share on sales
of $352 million and net income in 1991 of $3.3 million or $1.06 per share on
sales of $367 million.
Results for 1993 include extraordinary income of $7.3 million, or $2.11 per
share, relating to discounts on extinguishment of debt. Results for 1992
include extraordinary income of $4.4 million, or $1.42 per share, relating to
an exchange of $5.4 million of debt for 300,000 shares of ERLY common stock.
See Notes 6 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal year 1993 reported a loss from continuing operations of $16.0 million or
$4.63 per share compared to a loss from continuing operations in 1992 of $17.0
million or $5.43 per share compared to income from continuing operations of
$1.9 million, or $ .61 per share in 1991. Results from continuing operations
include investment income (loss) relating to ERLY's 48% interest in American
Rice, Inc. which amounted to ($1,630,000), ($2,607,000) and ($2,772,000) in
1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Included in 1991 income is a $3 million
gain on sale of ERLY's interest in a joint venture.
RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS
COMET RICE
Comet Rice reported operating profit (loss) (before interest expense and
corporate overhead) of ($55,000) on sales of $170 million in 1993, $4.9 million
on sales of $214 million in 1992 and $11.5 million on sales of $219 million in
1991.
Sales for 1993 of $170 million were $44 million, or 21% lower than 1992 sales.
Domestic sales were down in 1993 by $11 million or 11% from 1992 although
volume increased by 6%. The average sales price per cwt. for domestic rice
declined by 16% from $15.50 in 1992 to $12.99 in 1993 primarily due to lower
rough rice costs. Export sales in 1993 declined by $33 million or 30% from
1992 due to the disposition of Comet's Greenville, Mississippi mill in July
1992. Due to the August 23, 1993 Forbearance Agreement between ARI and its
lenders, Come Rice was precluded from utilizing excess capacity at ARI's
Freeport facility. Discontinuation of significant amounts of marginal export
business as a result of disposition of the Greenville mill resulted in lower
sales to all geographical areas except the Middle East and South America.
Expected profit margins on sales to Turkey caused increased sales to the Middle
East. Sales to South America in 1992 were primarily rough rice sales which
became uneconomical in 1993 due to changes in world supply and demand. The
average sales price per cwt. for export rice declined by only 7%, considerably
lower than the 16% domestic decline, while volume decreased by 25%.
Cost of sales declined by $42 million in 1993 from 1992. This represents a 22%
reduction which is proportionate to the 21% decline in sales. Lower rough rice
costs and reductions of fixed expenses resulting from the disposition of the
Greenville mill allowed the cost of sales decline to remain proportionate with
the sales decline.
31
<PAGE> 34
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Although gross profit increased as a percent of sales from 11.8% in fiscal 1992
to 13.2% in fiscal 1993, gross profit in dollars declined 12% from $25.4
million in 1992 to $22.4 million in 1993. Comet's operations in the Southern
U.S. ("Comet Delta" or "Delta") had a decline in gross profit of 36% reflecting
a 42% lower sales volume due, in part, to decreased milling capacity with the
disposition of the Greenville mill and transfer of Comet Delta's operations
from Greenville to the Stuttgart, Arkansas mill. The Delta decline was largely
offset by an increase in gross profit by Comet California attributable to a 14%
sales increase. The Puerto Rico operations contributed no gross profit due to
expenses associated with the closure of the Puerto Rico mill and conversion of
sales to toll packed product.
Comet Jamaica suffered losses due to a continuation of preferential tariffs
causing a competitive disadvantage for commercial sales of rice from the U.S.
Comet Rice has contracted approximately 20% of its rice needs in Arkansas and
Mississippi and over 50% of its rice needs in California from the 1993 crop.
In California, Comet has reduced the percent of rice purchased under contract
from prior years.
In April 1993, Comet sold its Harrisburg, Arkansas drying and storage facility.
This sale is not expected to have a material impact on the operations,
liquidity or cash flow of Comet.
The Comet-ARI Transaction provides a significant benefit to the Company. The
Company's investment in ARI (carried on the Company's books as of March 31,
1993 at $13.1 million) is preserved and enhanced as a result of the
restructuring and resultant refinancing. As a result of the Transaction, ARI
should have improved ability to service debt, a more diversified market for its
products, an expanded share of domestic and export rice markets, more
diversified sources for its supply of rough rice and improved abilities to
reduce costs, operate more efficiently and develop markets for its products.
The Transaction is expected to reduce manufacturing and distribution costs at
all Rice facilities as both companies process and package product closer to the
ultimate customer which would increase gross margins. ARI's Freeport facility
which operated at 85% and 72% capacity in fiscal 1993 and 1992, respectively,
provides Comet access to a Texas rice facility located on a deepwater port.
Comet will utilize excess capacity at the Freeport facility to process and
package rice for sales to Comet's Caribbean customers. ARI may utilize Comet's
California facility to package rice for sales to its California customers.
Selling, general and administrative costs are also expected to be lower due to
the consolidation of these functions at both companies. It is estimated that
most of these savings will come from relatively lower personnel costs and
similar expenses such as legal, insurance and auditing fees.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 1993 over 1992 by
$2.0 million or 32% due to increases in the allowance for doubtful accounts of
approximately $2.4 million.
Interest expense declined by $2.8 million or 35% during 1993 from 1992 due to
the disposition of indebtedness related to the Greenville mill, lower average
borrowings due to lower inventories and lower average interest rates. The
Transaction has increased working capital at the Company's rice subsidiary by
virtue of access to additional lines of credit. Interest expense, because of
the consolidation of ARI's financial statements, will increase by at least 60%.
32
<PAGE> 35
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In addition to the increase caused by the addition of ARI's fiscal 1993
interest expense, the Company's interest expense is expected to increase
slightly due to the net effect of higher interest rates as a result of the
refinancing, offset by reduced interest expense related to the reduction in
debt resulting from debt discounts provided by ARI's former lenders.
If and when the $5.2 million annual dividends are paid by ARI to the Company,
parent company liquidity will be materially enhanced. However, bank covenants
prevent dividends from being paid currently.
The refinancing included a $47.5 million line of credit by Congress Financial
and $65.3 million of term loans which were led by Chase Manhattan Bank.
Proceeds from this refinancing paid down ARI's $15 million revolving credit
line provided by Rabobank, TCB and Bank of America, ARI's $13.3 million term
loan provided by Rabobank, a settlement of ARI's $35.5 million term loan held
by TCB, Bank for Cooperatives and six insurance companies, and a paydown of
Comet's revolving and term debt of $44.4 million provided by Chase, ING Bank
and TCB.
Additional cash was required in order to complete refinancing for the
Transaction. Subsequent to the embargo on trade with Iraq in 1990 (see Export
Sales of Rice), the Aqaba facility was underutilized and during that period was
operating it at approximately 10% of capacity. Prior to the Iraq embargo, the
Aqaba facility operated at over 90% of capacity. Although access to the Aqaba
facility by all users of the facility subsequent to its sale in April 1993,
will eliminate a major competitive advantage held by Comet in sales to Iraq and
Jordan, the reduced volume of U.S. rice shipped to those countries during the
past three years indicate that the disposal would have a minimal effect on
Comet's operations. Therefore, Comet sold its interest in APC in April 1993 to
the 28% owner for $2.5 million in cash and future payments to be determined
related to the quantity of U.S. rice packaged by the Aqaba facility. Comet has
no remaining affiliation with the purchaser.
The terms of the revolver included a two year commitment at an interest rate of
prime plus 2%. The $65.3 million term loans mature on December 31, 1997 with
annual principal repayments required of $4.2 million, $5.9 million, $5.9
million, $5.9 million and $43.4 million in fiscal years ending March 31, 1994,
1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. Interest rates range from prime plus
3% to prime plus 5% through May 1995, increasing to a range of prime plus 6% to
prime plus 8% by 1997.
In addition, the Company believes that by combining the two rice companies,
both companies will be more successful due to the potential synergies and the
economies of scale that result from the combination. The Transaction is
expected to reduce manufacturing and distribution costs at all rice facilities
as both companies process and package product closer to the ultimate customer
which would increase gross margins. ARI's Freeport facility which operated at
85% and 72% capacity in fiscal 1993 and 1992, respectively, provides Comet
access to a Texas rice facility located on a deepwater port. Comet will
utilize excess capacity at the Freeport facility to process and package rice
for sales to Comet's Caribbean customers. ARI may utilize Comet's California
facility to package rice for sales to its California customers.
33
<PAGE> 36
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Selling, general and administrative costs are also expected to be lower due to
the consolidation of these functions at both companies. It is estimated that
most of these savings will come from relatively lower personnel costs and
similar expenses such as legal, insurance and auditing fees. The Company
estimates that less than 10 persons will be laid off as a result of the
Transaction.
The Transaction will allow better utilization of both companies' facilities due
to increased bank credit lines and working capital which will allow the Company
to purchase additional raw product and sell to more export markets.
Due to continuing operating losses resulting from low margins and uncertainty
about future U.S. rice exports, Comet ceased payments in January 1992 on a $16
million non-recourse obligation secured by its rice plant in Greenville,
Mississippi. Comet could no longer economically justify the investment in and
carrying cost of operating the primary facility of its division, Comet Delta.
Comet's decision was based on three factors: (1) the payment requirements were
non-recourse obligations not assumed by Comet when it took possession of the
facility in 1986, (2) Comet's Arkansas facility and ARI's Freeport facility
were both under-utilized, and (3) uncertainty about the future of U.S. rice
exports.
In July 1992, the Greenville, Mississippi facility was sold through a
foreclosure sale resulting in an extraordinary gain on debt forgiveness of
$4,726,000 after a $4 million write-down of the plant facility to estimated
market value (net gain from the transaction was $726,000). The disposition of
the Greenville facility allows Comet to better utilize other existing
facilities and adjust its operations to the lower export sales experienced by
the U.S. rice industry by acceptance of fewer marginal contracts and movement
of profitable contracts to consequently available capacity.
Sales for 1992 of $214 million were $5 million, or 2% lower than 1991 sales.
The mix between domestic sales and export sales was approximately the same in
1992 as 1991. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, total
U.S. export sales for crop year 1991 (which corresponds closest to Comet's
fiscal 1992) were down 15% compared to the prior year. Comet exports were down
only 2% and management believes that Comet increased its market share of
exports during this period. The increase in market share required increased
acceptance of marginal business and resulted in increased sales in 1992 over
1991 to the Caribbean, Europe and Africa. South America sales, consisting
primarily of rough rice, became less economical due to world supply conditions
and declined in 1992.
Comet's operating profit in 1992 of $4.9 million was down $6.6 million from
1991. Lower margins resulted from increased costs of rough rice in the
Southern U.S. and increased competition for domestic and export business as
domestic processors competed for a smaller rice crop and fewer export sales.
Comet Delta's gross profit in fiscal 1992 declined 33% from fiscal 1991 due to
reduced margins on export sales. Comet's operating results in 1992 were also
adversely impacted by losses in Puerto Rico and Jamaica. One-time costs
associated with changes in Comet Puerto Rico's management, higher rough rice
costs along with intense competition for business in Puerto Rico (which reduced
selling prices and increased direct selling expenses) resulted in operating
losses for Puerto Rico. Comet has attempted to develop its market in Jamaica,
but large import tariffs imposed on commercial sales of rice from the U.S. and
intense competition from CARICOM countries resulted in losses.
34
<PAGE> 37
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Due to the embargo of sales to Iraq, Comet's joint venture in the Aqaba, Jordan
rice finishing and packaging facility experienced losses during fiscal 1992.
At March 31, 1992 Comet's investment in the joint venture was $1.3 million and
it also had a $1.6 million note receivable from the joint venture. The Aqaba
Packaging facility operated at less than ten percent capacity in fiscal 1993.
Most of Comet's sales to the Middle East subsequent to the Iraq embargo have
been shipped directly to the market rather than through Aqaba. The sale of the
facility in April 1993 is not expected to affect the sales to current customers
of Comet.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for Comet in 1992 were down $3
million, or 12% lower than 1991. Included in the total are direct selling
expenses which declined $3.7 million in 1992 due to reduced export business
requiring payment of ocean freight.
ERLY JUICE
In fiscal 1993, ERLY Juice recorded a $2.9 million operating loss (before
interest expense and corporate overhead) on sales of $82 million compared to an
operating loss of $6.6 million on sales of $96 million in fiscal 1992.
Although sales decreased 14.7% and branded case volume declined 16.7% in 1993,
gross margin improved by $492,000 as compared to 1992. On a per case basis,
the average net selling price of branded product increased 5%, while the cost
of sales decreased 4.4% and direct selling costs increased 21.9%.
Competitive conditions allowed sales price increases during the first part of
fiscal 1993, while costs were reasonably low. Prices dropped in the last half
of the year as the industry looked forward to record volume production from the
Florida crop. Margins narrowed as competitors sold off excess inventories in
anticipation of the new crop.
Margins continue to be low in the first quarter of fiscal 1994, as the industry
moved this record crop into the marketplace. Intense competition, ERLY Juice's
highest level of debt and negative working capital continue to create pressure
on current and future earnings. Future operating performances are dependent
upon improvement in sales volume and stability in costs.
In February 1993, the Company entered into settlement arrangements with two
creditors of ERLY Juice whereby $3.1 million of debt and accrued interest was
satisfied in exchange for payments totalling $569,000. These transactions
resulted in gains of $2,562,000 on extinguishment of debt, which are reflected
as extraordinary income in fiscal 1993.
In January 1993, ERLY Juice sold its wholly owned subsidiary, TreeSweet of
Puerto Rico, Inc. Sale proceeds of $3.5 million were used to reduce debt.
This transaction resulted in a gain of $1,392,000. ERLY Juice will no longer
have sales in the Puerto Rican market which historically has accounted for
about 10% and 15% of ERLY Juice's sales and gross profit, respectively.
No citrus raw product contracts have been signed for the 1993-1994 crop. In
August of the prior year, about 80% of the raw product purchases had been
contracted. The Company believes that it will be able to contract its raw
product needs from the 1993 crop with the new owner of the Lakeland facility or
from other processors.
35
<PAGE> 38
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
During the year ended March 31, 1992, ERLY Juice reported an operating loss of
$6.6 million on sales of $96 million. Operations were adversely affected
during the first half of the year due to a disruption in the market caused by
the transition from the Kraft label to the TreeSweet label. In addition, ERLY
Juice's margins were reduced by the sudden and dramatic increase in raw fruit
prices in October 1991 due to industry reports of estimated reductions in the
upcoming orange crop. Competitive conditions caused sales price increases to
lag such cost increases, resulting in significantly lower-than-normal margins
during the last half of fiscal 1992. Subsequent to year end, ERLY Juice sold
its Lakeland facility which was its primary processing and packaging facility.
ERLY Juice operated the Lakeland, Florida plant at less than full capacity.
Management believes that by selling the plant and contracting for the same
services with the purchaser of the facility, ERLY Juice will convert to
processing and packaging costs to copacking fees which should result in a cost
savings when compared to its operational expenses attributable to the Lakeland
facility. As a result of the sale, Juice will not own any processing or
packing capacity in Florida. The Company believes that there is sufficient
excess capacity in the industry to process and pack its product at comparable
rates if access to the Lakeland facility is interrupted.
As a result, the Company believes that the sale of the Lakeland facility will
reduce ERLY Juice's working capital requirements, reduce operating costs and
improve cash flow. Sales are not expected to be affected.
During the year ended March 31, 1991, ERLY Juice reported operating profits of
$1.1 million on sales of $106 million. The operations were adversely affected
by consumer resistance to price increases related to the freeze in December
1989 and by interruptions caused by the transition of the sales force from
Kraft representation to independent food brokers. The Company also incurred
higher 8 than normal marketing and promotional expenses because of the
transition from the Kraft label to the TreeSweet label.
CHEMONICS INDUSTRIES
Chemonics reported combined sales in 1993 of $49.8 million compared to $41.2
million in 1992 and $33.9 million in 1991.
Chemonics International continues to expand its consulting business with sales
of $37.2 million in 1993, up 20% from 1992 sales of $31.0 million. Sales in
1992 were up 52% from 1991 sales of $20.4 million. Funded contract backlog at
March 31, 1993 was approximately $143 million, covering 1994 through 1999, up
from $120 million at the end of fiscal 1992. Fire-Trol sales, which are
directly affected by weather, location and severity of fires, have varied over
the last three years with sales of $12.6 million in 1993, $10.2 million in 1992
and $13.4 million in 1991.
INVESTMENT INCOME
In fiscal 1993, ERLY reported an investment loss of $1.6 million representing:
(1) a $3.2 million write-down on the portion of its investment in ARI
attributed to ARI's Houston property, offset by (2) income of $1,560,000 from
ERLY's 48% equity interest in ARI's net income for fiscal year 1993. In
fiscal 1992, ERLY reported an investment loss of $1.6 million comprised of a
$2.6 million loss on its 48% interest in ARI's net loss, offset by a $1.0
million decrease in the reserve on the Company's note receivable from
California CoPackers (due to reduced loss
36
<PAGE> 39
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
exposure to ERLY since California CoPackers was sold and ERLY received $5.2
million in cash and a $4 million note receivable in July 1992). This compares
to investment income of $2.2 million in fiscal 1991 as a result of a $3.0
million gain from the sale of a joint venture interest in Kasco Media Trading
Company, a $2.0 million decrease in the reserve on the note receivable from
California CoPackers, partially offset by a $2.8 million loss from ERLY's 48%
interest in ARI's 1991 net loss.
CORPORATE
Consolidated interest expense was $11.1 million, $14.9 million and $16.2
million in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. This favorable trend has
resulted from lower interest rates on variable-rate borrowings due to the
declining prime interest rate and reductions in long-term and subordinated
debt. ERLY has reduced its long-term debt and subordinated debt by $24.7
million (33% of outstanding term debt as of March 31, 1992), $10.7 million and
$3.9 million in fiscal years 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. This
represents a $39.3 million reduction for the three-year period ended March 31,
1993.
If and when the $5.2 million annual dividends are paid by ARI to the Company,
parent company liquidity will be materially enhanced. However, bank covenants
prevent dividends from being paid currently.
RESULTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
THE BEVERAGE SOURCE
The Beverage Source ("TBS") is classified as a discontinued operation for
financial reporting purposes. In fiscal year 1990, all wine brands and labels
were sold in separate transactions. The direct sales force, main office and
bottling operations were shut down. The remaining business was a streamlined
bulk wine processing operation with two wineries at Sanger and Tulare,
California. In June 1992, the winery at Sanger was sold.
The TBS restructuring has enabled it to operate with slightly positive cash
flow in fiscal year 1993 and to continue to meet current operating obligations.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
For the year ended March 31, 1993, ERLY recorded a $8.7 million net loss. Cash
remained equal to the prior year as a result of $15.4 million in cash provided
by operating activities, $7.3 million provided by investing activities, offset
by a $23.7 million use of cash in financing activities.
Cash provided by operating activities resulted from decreases in inventory
levels and receivables at Comet Rice of $19.4 million and $9.1 million,
respectively, offset by decreases in accounts payable and other current
liabilities at Comet Rice of $11.4 million. These changes at Comet Rice were
primarily due to the sale of the Greenville facility.
37
<PAGE> 40
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cash provided by investing activities primarily was due to the $5.2 million
payment received from California CoPackers and the $3.5 million proceeds from
the sale of ERLY Juice's Puerto Rico subsidiary, offset by capital expenditures
of $5.2 million.
Cash used in financing activities primarily reflected the $16.3 million
decreased in notes payable due to lower inventory and receivable levels as well
as $6.6 million principal payments on long-term debt.
Comet's cash flow in 1993 was significantly reduced from 1992 primarily as a
result of its operating loss and reduced export sales of $33.4 million.
Although gross profit increased as a percent of sales from 11.8% to 13.2%,
total operating profit decreased by $4.9 million in 1993 as compared to 1992.
The transaction by which Comet was combined with ARI is expected to provide
improved cash flows due to operating and administrative synergies of the two
companies.
Although 1993 operating losses were reduced at ERLY Juice compared to 1992,
ERLY Juice's cash flow continues to be negatively impacted by intense
competition and negative working capital. In an effort to reduce bank debt and
improve liquidity, ERLY Juice sold its TreeSweet of Puerto Rico operations in
January 1993, and the Lakeland, Florida processing facility in July 1993.
Chemonics' operations for 1994 are expected to provide positive cash flows,
similar to those experienced in 1990 through 1993. The growth in sales of
Chemonics International has increased the need for additional short-term bank
debt and working capital, particularly during the increased temporary demands
of the fire season. Discussions with Chemonics' bank are in process and the
Company believes that the credit line will be increased to accommodate these
seasonal demands.
The parent company's operating cash requirements for corporate overhead are
expected to be met through positive cash flows from investments, remaining wine
operations and management fees received from subsidiaries. Lines of credit
have been arranged through subsidiary companies, with the result that cash
distributions are either not permitted to the parent company or limited to
certain amounts under management agreements.
The 12-1/2% subordinated sinking fund debentures with an outstanding principal
balance of $8.9 million, will mature on December 1, 1993. At this time, the
Company is considering a number of alternatives for refinancing these
debentures, including a request to the debenture holders to extend the maturity
date. At this time, no proposal has been offered by the Company to the
bondholders and consequently there is no assurance that the Company will be
able to satisfactorily refinance the bonds. Management, however, believes that
a refinancing may be accomplished.
For the year ended March 31, 1992, ERLY recorded a $12.5 million net loss.
Cash increased by $900,000 from the prior fiscal year due to $7.6 million in
cash provided by operating activities, offset by $2.1 million in cash used in
investing activities, and $4.6 million used in financing activities.
38
<PAGE> 41
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cash provided by operating activities resulted primarily from $24 million in
decreases of inventory and accounts payable and $6 million in other current
liabilities in both Comet Rice and ERLY Juice, offset by a net loss of $12.5
million.
Cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of $2.3 million in
capital expenditures.
Cash used in financing activities consisted primarily of $7.0 million of
principal payments on long-term debt.
For the year ended March 31, 1991, ERLY recorded a $3.3 million net income.
Cash remained equal to the prior year as a result of $1.2 million in cash
provided by operating activities, $1.6 million in cash provided by financing
activities, offset by $2.9 million of cash used in investing activities.
Cash provided by operating activities primarily reflected a decrease in
receivables, offset by a decrease in accounts payable and other current
liabilities. Cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of $4.5
million in capital expenditures. Cash provided by financing activities
consisted primarily of increases in notes payable and new long-term debt,
partially offset by $7.4 million in principal payments on long-term debt.
A plan to improve liquidity, reduce term debt, and overcome financial
limitations of ERLY Industries Inc. was initiated in 1989. Accomplishments to
date with respect to this plan are as follows:
Most importantly, ERLY completed the multiyear effort to combine ERLY's wholly
owned subsidiary, Comet Rice, Inc., and its 48% owned American Rice, Inc. in
May 1993. This transaction involved restructuring and refinancing the combined
indebtedness of Comet and ARI. During the six months prior to the Transaction,
one of ARI's lenders had posted several notices of foreclosure on ARI's
Freeport facility, the last foreclosure date being June 1, 1993. ERLY's
investment in ARI at the time of the Transaction was approximately $13 million.
See Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
discussion.
California CoPackers purchased Hansen Foods out of bankruptcy in January 1990
and ERLY received approximately $11.3 million in cash and a note receivable for
the balance of ERLY's $24 million notes receivable from Hansen Foods. In July
1992, the assets and business, subject to certain liabilities, of California
CoPackers were purchased by a third party. In exchange for its $8 million net
receivable (net of a $3 million reserve), ERLY received a payment of $5.2
million (which was used to pay down bank debt as required by Comet's loan
agreements) and a $4 million note receivable, secured by the Hansen trademark
license.
The liquidation of The Beverage Source's trademarks, inventory and receivables
was substantially completed by April 1990. In June 1992, TBS sold its Sanger,
California facility, further reducing its operations in the wine business.
In March 1991, ERLY Industries sold its 50% share in Kasco Media Trading
Company to its joint venture partner, resulting in a $3 million gain.
In July 1992, Comet's Greenville, Mississippi rice facility, which was secured
by a $16 million non-recourse obligation, was disposed through foreclosure
sale.
39
<PAGE> 42
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In conjunction therewith, the Company eliminated $16 million of debt and
property, plant and equipment of $14 million.
In January 1993, ERLY Juice sold its wholly owned subsidiary, TreeSweet of
Puerto Rico, Inc. Sale proceeds of $3.5 million were used to reduce debt.
As a result of the foregoing, as of March 31, 1993 ERLY has reduced term debt
relating to continuing operations by 50% since 1989. Term debt (both long-term
and current portion) was $50.5 million as of March 31, 1993 compared to $99.9
million as of March 31, 1989, a decrease of $56.8 million partially offset by
an increase in term debt of $7.4 million. These debt reductions have occurred
as a result of asset sales, restructurings and scheduled principal payments.
An additional $20.1 million reduction of short-term debt and term debt of
discontinued operations resulted from asset sales and discontinuation of The
Beverage Source. Since March 31, 1993, term debt has been reduced an
additional $16 million as a result of the sale of ERLY Juice's Lakeland
facility and settlement of other ERLY Juice term debt with a major supplier
(See Note 21).
The Company's subsidiaries were in violation of certain debt covenants at March
31, 1993. The combination of Comet Rice and American Rice in May 1993, and the
associated Refinancing eliminated the violations at Comet Rice (See Note 3).
Negotiations are in process with the Company's lenders to restructure ERLY
Juice's debt and to provide a temporary increased working capital facility for
Chemonics. ERLY Juice had a $6.5 million term loan and a $30 million revolver
loan with ING Bank. As a result of the Lakeland sale, ERLY Juice's remaining
ING debt is $23 million. The Company is negotiating with its lender to extend
the maturity so that ERLY Juice can realize the expected benefits to gross
margins to be realized as a result of the sale of Lakeland. Both negotiations
are expected to be completed in fiscal year 1994.
ERLY Juice, under the terms of its borrowing agreement, did not have to make
principal payments in fiscal year 1993.
Because of the continuing losses at ERLY Juice, the Company's restructuring
alternatives for ERLY Juice include the possibility of selling or discontinuing
the business.
With the combination of Comet Rice with ARI which was completed on May 26,
1993, the combined rice operations are expected to provide sufficient cash flow
to make payments under its management agreement. Under the terms of the ARI
Series B Preferred Stock issued to ERLY in exchange for the assets and
liabilities of Comet, ERLY is entitled to an aggregate dividend of
approximately $5.2 million per year. ARI loan agreements contain various
restrictions on the ability of ARI to pay such dividends and ARI is precluded
from paying the dividends during the five-year term of the loan agreement.
The Refinancing included a $47.5 million line of credit by Congress Financial
and $65.3 million of term loans which were led by Chase Manhattan Bank.
Proceeds from this Refinancing paid down ARI's $15 million revolving credit
line provided by Rabobank, TCB and Bank of America, ARI's $13.3 million term
loan provided by Rabobank, a settlement of ARI's $35.5 million term loan held
by TCB, Bank for Cooperatives and six insurance companies, and a paydown of
Comet's revolving and term debt of $44.4 million provided by Chase, ING Bank
and TCB.
40
<PAGE> 43
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The terms of the revolver included a two year commitment at an interest rate of
prime plus 2%. The $65.3 million term loans mature on December 31, 1997 with
annual principal repayments required of $4.2 million, $5.9 million, $5.9
million, $5.9 million and $43.4 million in fiscal years ending March 31, 1994,
1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. Interest rates range from prime plus
3% to prime plus 5% through May 1995, increasing to a range of prime plus 6% to
prime plus 8% by 1997.
ARI is required to maintain certain financial ratios as part of the new
revolver and term loan agreements. The financial ratio covenants are as
follows:
Net book value (greater than) $24.5 million plus 50% of
net income Working capital (greater than) $7.0 million plus 50% of net income
Financial leverage (less than) 4.5 to 1 through March 31, 1994
Working capital leverage (less than) 5.0 to 1 through March 31, 1994
Coverage ratio (greater than) 1 to 1
ARI's new term and revolving debt agreements require ERLY to guarantee the debt
of ARI. These agreements also provide the lenders with the option of
accelerating repayment of the ARI debt and terminating the agreements under
certain conditions related to ERLY's ability to meet its obligations as they
come due, and to remain in compliance with its debt agreements.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred substantial
operating losses in each of the two years ended March 31, 1993, has a
consolidated working capital deficit of approximately $44 million and has a
consolidated deficiency in assets at March 31, 1993. In addition, the Company
is in default on certain of its bank debt covenants. These conditions raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
41
<PAGE> 44
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended March 31 1993* 1992 1991
- - - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $301,644,000 $351,674,000 $367,387,000
Cost of sales 240,394,000 289,975,000 288,938,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Gross profit 61,250,000 61,699,000 78,449,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 62,716,000 63,459,000 64,505,000
Interest expense 11,051,000 14,920,000 16,194,000
Interest income (700,000) (1,194,000) (1,394,000)
Investment (income) loss 1,630,000 1,607,000 (2,228,000)
Other income (508,000) (594,000) (939,000)
Gain on sale of subsidiary (1,392,000)
Write-down of rice facility 4,000,000
------------ ------------ ------------
76,797,000 78,198,000 76,138,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before
taxes on income,
discontinued operations
and extraordinary items (15,547,000) (16,499,000) 2,311,000
Taxes on income 414,000 476,000 451,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before discontinued
operations and
extraordinary items (15,961,000) (16,975,000) 1,860,000
Discontinued operations:
Provision for (losses) credit
on discontinued businesses - - 1,400,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary items (15,961,000) (16,975,000) 3,260,000
Extraordinary items 7,288,000 4,436,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) ($8,673,000) ($12,539,000) $ 3,260,000
============ ============ ===========
Weighted average common
shares outstanding** 3,444,000 3,127,000 3,089,000
============ ============ ===========
Net income (loss) per
common share:
Continuing operations ($4.63) ($5.43) $ .61
Discontinued operations .45
Extraordinary items 2.11 1.42
------------ ------------ ------------
($2.52) ($4.01) $1.06
============ ============ ===========
</TABLE>
* Restated for write-down of investment in ARI attributed to Houston property
(1993) described in Note 22.
** Retroactively adjusted to give effect to a 10% stock dividend in
September 1990.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
<PAGE> 45
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro Forma
March 31 After Merger 1993 1992
- - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Unaudited (Restated
ASSETS - Note 3) - Note 22)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash $ 4,268,000 $ 3,872,000 $ 3,842,000
Notes and accounts receivable,
less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $3,280,000 (1993)
and $956,000 (1992) 41,908,000 35,534,000 53,345,000
Inventories 57,988,000 27,725,000 51,402,000
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets 5,781,000 2,524,000 2,751,000
Rice facility, net (disposed
July 1992) 14,031,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total current assets 109,945,000 69,655,000 125,371,000
Long-term notes receivable, net 5,764,000 6,623,000 6,354,000
Property, plant and equipment, net 76,428,000 30,857,000 32,564,000
Assets held for sale, net 22,544,000 4,210,000 7,339,000
Investment in American Rice, Inc. 13,104,000 14,734,000
Other assets 23,742,000 10,651,000 10,364,000
------------ ------------ ------------
$238,423,000 $135,100,000 $196,726,000
============ ============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable, collateralized $ 64,217,000 $ 62,359,000 $ 78,696,000
Accounts payable 41,061,000 20,106,000 32,807,000
Accrued payroll and other
current liabilities 2,072,000 7,298,000 6,332,000
Income taxes payable 2,034,000 1,829,000 1,807,000
Debt related to rice facility 16,054,000
Current portion of long-term
and subordinated debt 26,731,000 22,531,000 34,805,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 136,115,000 114,123,000 170,501,000
Long-term debt 70,511,000 26,881,000 14,722,000
Subordinated debt 1,094,000 1,094,000 9,638,000
Deferred income taxes 3,343,000
Minority interest 13,598,000 790,000 832,000
Redeemable common stock,
300,000 shares issued
and outstanding 1,406,000 1,406,000 1,012,000
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $1 a share:
Authorized: 5,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding: 3,186,956
shares (1993) and 3,129,513
shares (1992) 3,187,000 3,187,000 3,130,000
Additional paid-in capital 12,687,000 12,687,000 12,993,000
Retained earnings (deficit) (2,569,000) (24,119,000) (15,446,000)
Cumulative foreign currency
adjustments (949,000) (949,000) (656,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 12,356,000 (9,194,000) 21,000
------------ ------------ ------------
$238,423,000 $135,100,000 $196,726,000
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
<PAGE> 46
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended March 31 1993* 1992 1991
- - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) ($8,673,000) ($12,539,000) $ 3,260,000
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization 4,279,000 5,124,000 5,123,000
Equity in net (income) loss
of American Rice, Inc. 1,630,000 2,607,000 2,772,000
Extraordinary income on disposal
of rice facility (4,726,000)
Write-down of rice facility 4,000,000
Gain on sale of subsidiary (1,392,000)
Extraordinary income on
extinguishment of debt (2,562,000) (4,436,000)
Income on investments (1,000,000) (5,000,000)
Provision for losses (credit)
on discontinued businesses (1,400,000)
Provision for loss on receivables 2,359,000 208,000 409,000
Change in assets and liabilities,
net of effects of acquisition
and sale of businesses:
Decrease (increase) in
receivables 8,561,000 (1,743,000) 18,223,000
Decrease (increase) in
inventories 22,757,000 24,014,000 (5,798,000)
Decrease in prepaid and
other current assets 186,000 117,000 1,524,000
(Decrease) in accounts
payable and other current
liabilities (11,060,000) (6,057,000) (17,606,000)
Increase (decrease) in taxes
payable 22,000 (176,000) 200,000
Decrease (increase) in assets
held for sale 1,479,000 (479,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 15,381,000 7,598,000 1,228,000
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 47
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended March 31 1993* 1992 1991
- - - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Payment on note receivable from
California CoPackers 5,200,000
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary 3,460,000
Disposition of property, plant
and equipment 2,531,000 289,000 277,000
Additions to property, plant
and equipment (5,200,000) (2,302,000) (4,522,000)
Payments on notes receivable
related to Hansen Foods 1,000,000
Other, net 1,355,000 (74,000) 375,000
----------- ----------- -----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES 7,346,000 (2,087,000) (2,870,000)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase (decrease) in
notes payable** (16,337,000) 1,334,000 5,557,000
Proceeds from long-term debt 159,000 1,091,000 3,500,000
Principal payments on
long-term debt (5,304,000) (5,519,000) (5,895,000)
Principal payments on
subordinated debt (1,360,000) (1,557,000) (1,558,000)
Proceeds from sale of stock 145,000 27,000 15,000
----------- ----------- -----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES (22,697,000) (4,624,000) 1,619,000
----------- ----------- -----------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
DURING THE YEAR 30,000 887,000 (23,000)
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR 3,842,000 2,955,000 2,978,000
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH, END OF YEAR $ 3,872,000 $ 3,842,000 $ 2,955,000
=========== =========== ===========
Supplemental cash flow information -
Net cash paid during the year for:
Interest expense $10,346,000 $13,683,000 $15,899,000
Income taxes $ 392,000 $ 620,000 $ 441,000
</TABLE>
Non-cash financing activities:
During 1992, the Company issued 300,000 shares of redeemable common stock
valued at $1.0 million in exchange for debt in the amount of $5.4 million,
resulting in an extraordinary gain of $4.4 million.
* Restated. See Note 22.
** Reflects net changes in borrowing arrangements which are related to
levels of inventories and accounts receivable.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
45
<PAGE> 48
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative
Additional Retained Foreign Total
Common Paid-in Earnings Currency Stockholders'
Stock Capital (Deficit) Adjustments Equity*
- - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE
April 1, 1990 $2,806,000 $11,349,000 ($4,482,000) $86,000 $9,759,000
Net income 3,260,000 3,260,000
Foreign currency
adjustments 110,000 110,000
Common stock
issued 3,000 12,000 15,000
10% stock dividend 280,000 1,402,000 (1,682,000)
Cash payments in
lieu of fractional
shares (3,000) (3,000)
---------- ----------- ------------ --------- ------------
BALANCE
March 31, 1991 3,089,000 12,763,000 (2,907,000) 196,000 13,141,000
Net income (loss) (12,539,000) (12,539,000)
Foreign currency
adjustments (852,000) (852,000)
Common stock
issued 41,000 230,000 271,000
---------- ----------- ------------ -------- ----------
BALANCE
March 31, 1992 3,130,000 12,993,000 (15,446,000) (656,000) 21,000
Net income (loss) (8,673,000) (8,673,000)
Foreign currency
adjustments (293,000) (293,000)
Common stock
issued 57,000 88,000 145,000
Accretion of
redeemable common
stock (394,000) (394,000)
---------- ----------- ------------ --------- -----------
BALANCE
March 31, 1993 $3,187,000 $12,687,000 ($24,119,000) ($949,000) ($9,194,000)
========== =========== ============ ========= ===========
</TABLE>
* Restated. See Note 22.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
46
<PAGE> 49
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of consolidation--The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of ERLY Industries Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
"Company" or "ERLY"). All significant intercompany accounts, intercompany
profits and intercompany transactions are eliminated.
Investment in companies in which the Company holds less than a majority
interest (but greater than a 20% interest) and does not have a controlling
economic interest are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Under
the equity method, the investments are initially recorded at cost, are adjusted
by the Company's share of results of operations, and are reduced by
distributions received.
Inventories--Certain rice inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market
on an identified lot basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. Other inventories are stated primarily at the lower of average cost or
market. Inventory cost includes direct materials, direct labor and
manufacturing overhead. Market value is determined by deducting the costs of
disposition from estimated selling prices.
The Company, from time to time, buys and sells futures contracts as a hedge of
certain inventory positions. The contracts are accounted for in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 80, "Accounting
for Futures Contracts." Gains and losses are recognized when the related
inventory is sold.
Property, plant and equipment--Fixed assets are stated at cost and are
depreciated, using the straight-line method of depreciation, over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets as follows: buildings and improvements--3
to 30 years; and machinery and equipment--3 to 25 years.
Other assets--Included in other assets are trademarks and tradenames which are
being amortized over 30 years and deferred costs related to long-term debt and
subordinated debentures which are being amortized over the respective terms of
the related debt.
Federal and state income taxes--In February 1992, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes" which superseded SFAS No. 96. This Statement
requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the
financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the
financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of existing assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The Company's fiscal year 1993 financial
statements reflect the adoption of SFAS 109. There was no material affect to
adopting this standard. The application of these policies is affected by net
operating loss carryforwards available to the Company.
Foreign currency translation--All assets and liabilities of operations outside
the United States are translated at the foreign exchange rates in effect at
year end. Revenues and expenses for the year are translated at average
exchange rates during the year. Translation gains and losses are not included
in determining net income but are accumulated and reported as a separate
component of stockholders' equity. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions are credited or charged to income.
47
<PAGE> 50
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Earnings per share--Earnings per share are based on the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during each year, retroactively adjusted
to give effect to a 10% stock dividend in September 1990. Stock options and
warrants have no dilutive effect on the calculation of earnings per share.
NOTE 2 - MANAGEMENT PLAN
A plan to improve liquidity, reduce term debt, and overcome financial
limitations of ERLY Industries Inc. was initiated in 1989. Accomplishments to
date with respect to this plan are as follows:
Most importantly, ERLY completed the Transaction to combine ERLY's wholly owned
subsidiary, Comet Rice, Inc. ("Comet Rice" or "Comet"), and American Rice, Inc.
("ARI") in May 1993. ERLY also refinanced the combined indebtedness of Comet
and ARI. During the six months prior to the transaction, one of ARI's lenders
had posted several notices of foreclosure on ARI's Freeport facility, the last
foreclosure being June 1, 1993. As a result of the transaction, ERLY increased
its ownership in ARI from 48% to 81% of the combined voting power of ARI. See
Notes 3 and 4 for additional discussion.
California CoPackers purchased Hansen Foods out of bankruptcy in January 1990
and ERLY received approximately $11.3 million in cash and a note receivable for
the balance of ERLY's $24 million notes receivable from Hansen Foods. In July
1992, the assets and business, subject to certain liabilities, of California
CoPackers were purchased by a third party. In exchange for its $8 million net
receivable (net of a $3 million reserve), ERLY received a payment of $5.2
million (which was used to pay down bank debt as required by Comet's loan
agreements) and a $4 million note receivable, secured by the Hansen trademark
license.
The liquidation of The Beverage Source's trademarks, inventory and receivables
was substantially completed by April 1990. In June 1992, TBS sold its Sanger,
California facility, further reducing its operations in the wine business.
In March 1991, ERLY Industries sold its 50% share in Kasco Media Trading
Company to its joint venture partner, resulting in a $3 million gain.
In July 1992, Comet's Greenville, Mississippi rice facility, which was secured
by a $16 million non-recourse obligation, was disposed through foreclosure
sale. In conjunction therewith, the Company eliminated $16 million of debt and
property, plant and equipment of $14 million.
In January 1993, ERLY Juice sold its wholly owned subsidiary, TreeSweet of
Puerto Rico, Inc. Sale proceeds of $3.5 million were used to reduce debt.
As a result of the foregoing, as of March 31, 1993 ERLY has reduced term debt
relating to continuing operations by 50% since 1989. Term debt (both long-term
and current portion) was $50.5 million as of March 31, 1993 compared to $99.9
million as of March 31, 1989, a decrease of $56.8 million partially offset by
an increase in term debt of $7.4 million. These debt reductions have occurred
as a result of asset sales, restructurings and scheduled principal payments.
An additional $20.1 million reduction of short-term debt and term debt of
discontinued operations resulted from asset sales and discontinuation of The
Beverage Source. Since March 31, 1993, term debt has been
48
<PAGE> 51
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 - MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONTINUED)
reduced an additional $16 million as a result of the sale of ERLY Juice's
Lakeland facility and settlement of other ERLY Juice term debt with a major
supplier (See Note 21).
The Company's subsidiaries were in violation of certain debt covenants at March
31, 1993. The combination of Comet Rice and American Rice in May 1993, and the
associated refinancing eliminated the violations at Comet Rice (See Note 3).
Negotiations are in process with the Company's lenders to restructure ERLY
Juice's debt and to provide a temporary increased working capital facility for
Chemonics. Both negotiations are expected to be completed in fiscal year 1994.
ERLY Juice, under the terms of its borrowing agreement, did not have to make
principal payments in fiscal year 1993.
Because of the continuing losses at ERLY Juice, the Company's restructuring
alternatives for Juice include the possibility of selling or discontinuing the
business.
With the combination of Comet Rice with ARI which was completed on May 26, 1993
(Note 3), the combined rice operations are expected to provide sufficient cash
flow to make payments under its management agreement. Under the terms of the
ARI Series B Preferred Stock issued to ERLY in exchange for the assets and
liabilities of Comet, ERLY is entitled to an aggregate dividend of
approximately $5.2 million per year. ARI loan agreements contain various
restrictions on the ability of ARI to pay such dividends and ARI is precluded
from paying the dividends during the five-year term of the loan agreement.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred substantial
operating losses in each of the two years ended March 31, 1993, has a
consolidated working capital deficit of approximately $44 million and has a
consolidated deficiency in assets at March 31, 1993. In addition, the Company
is in default on certain of its bank debt covenants. These conditions raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY AMERICAN RICE,
INC.
American Rice, Inc. is a public company involved in the rice business. Formed
in 1987, ARI succeeded an agricultural cooperative in a reorganization.
Pursuant to the reorganization, which was consummated in April 1988, ARI
acquired all of the assets of the cooperative in exchange for approximately 52%
of ARI's outstanding voting stock.
The remaining 48% of ARI's voting stock was acquired by ERLY's wholly owned
subsidiary, Comet Rice, Inc. in exchange for $20 million cash and Comet's 50%
ownership in an ARI and Comet joint venture, Comet American Marketing.
In March 1990, ERLY, Comet and ARI entered into an agreement to merge Comet
into ARI. The planned combination would result in all of the assets and
liabilities formerly held by Comet to be held by ARI and would result in ERLY
owning 81% of the voting securities.
In March 1991, the shareholders of ARI approved the merger agreement subject
to obtaining necessary short and long-term financing. However, the merger
financing was not completed and in August 1992 the prior merger agreement
was terminated.
49
<PAGE> 52
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY
AMERICAN RICE, INC. (CONTINUED)
On May 26, 1993, ARI consummated a transaction to acquire substantially all of
the assets of Comet and assume all of Comet's liabilities (the "Transaction").
ARI also refinanced the combined indebtedness of ARI and Comet ("Refinancing").
In exchange for the assets acquired (and liabilities assumed) from Comet, ARI
issued to ERLY 14,000,000 shares of a newly created Series B Preferred Stock,
$1 par value. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock provides for annual
cumulative, non-participating dividends of $.37, is convertible into two shares
of ARI common stock, is entitled to two votes, and has a liquidation preference
of $1.00 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock issued to ERLY carries an
aggregate dividend of approximately $5.2 million per year. Applicable loan
agreements contain various restrictions on the ability of ARI to pay such
dividends and ARI is currently precluded from paying the dividends. The Comet
assets acquired by ARI did not include the ARI stock previously held by Comet.
In connection with the Transaction, Comet transferred the ARI stock held by it
to ERLY. Comet's combined holdings of ARI common stock and ARI Series A
Preferred Stock prior to the Transaction, represented approximately 48% of the
voting power of the outstanding ARI stock. As a result of the Transaction,
ERLY holds 81% of the combined voting power and common stock equivalents of ARI
stock outstanding after the Transaction.
In connection with the Refinancing, ARI received $47.5 million in credit lines
from a new revolving credit lender and loans from new term lenders for $65.3
million. In addition, ERLY is a guarantor for all of the new ARI debt and the
loan agreements contain certain restrictive covenants applicable to ERLY.
These agreements also provide the lenders with the option of accelerating
repayment of the ARI debt and terminating the agreements under certain
conditions related to ERLY's ability to meet its obligations as they come due,
and to remain in compliance with its debt agreements.
As additional consideration, 13 million shares of ARI Series B Preferred Stock,
$1 par value, were pledged by ERLY for the benefit of the new term lenders. In
connection with the Refinancing, ARI's indebtedness to its former lenders was
partially satisfied by ARI's issuance to the former lenders of a combined
aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of a newly created Series C Preferred Stock,
which carries annual cumulative, non- participating dividends of $.50 per
share, is non-convertible and non-voting, has a liquidation preference of $1.00
per share, and is callable by ARI at any time at a price of $5.27 per share
less aggregate dividend payments per share. Applicable loan agreements with
the new lenders contain various restrictions on the ability of ARI to pay these
dividends and ARI is currently precluded from paying the dividends. As part of
the Refinancing, ARI's former lenders agreed to a debt discount of
approximately $10.5 million. As additional consideration for the satisfaction
of the existing indebtedness of ARI, ERLY issued notes of $3 million and
pledged one million shares of ARI Series B Preferred Stock for the benefit of
the former lenders. This $3 million was offset by ARI against its receivable
from ERLY.
ARI and Comet have capitalized approximately $5 million of costs associated
with the Refinancing at the date of closing. These costs will be amortized
over the respective terms of the new ARI debt.
50
<PAGE> 53
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY AMERICAN RICE,
INC. (CONTINUED)
ERLY's management believes the Transaction will allow better utilization of
both companies' physical assets, improve cash flow and working capital through
operating efficiencies, and increase the overall financial strength of the
combined rice business through debt reduction. The expected result is the
ability of the combined rice operations to provide sufficient cash flow to
permit the payment of dividends to ERLY in future years, which in turn will be
used by ERLY to service its debt obligations, including new debt of $3 million
to old ARI term lenders which was required as part of the Refinancing. No debt
service on the $3 million debt to the old ARI term lenders is required unless
dividend payments are declared by ARI to ERLY.
51
<PAGE> 54
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY AMERICAN RICE,
INC. (CONTINUED)
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Transaction has been accounted for by ERLY as an acquisition, using the
purchase method of accounting, under which the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values.
The unaudited pro forma condensed balance sheet and statement of operations are
not necessarily indicative of the financial position and results of operations
that would have resulted had the Transaction actually occurred on the assumed
dates and should not be used to predict future results.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ERLY American Eliminations Pro Forma
Industries Rice, and March 31,
Inc. Inc. Pro Forma 1993
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustments Notes (Unaudited)
------------ ------------ ----------- ----- -----------
(as restated) (in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 3,872 $ 1,926 ($ 1,530) b,d $ 4,268
Notes and accounts
receivable, net 35,534 11,484 (5,110) a,b 41,908
Inventories 27,725 30,263 57,988
Prepaid expenses and
deferred income taxes 2,524 2,377 880 e 5,781
-------- -------- -------- --------
69,655 46,050 (5,760) 109,945
Note receivable from ERLY 921 (921) a
Property, plant and
equipment 30,857 35,522 10,049 b,c 76,428
Investment in ARI 13,104 (13,104) a -
Assets held for sale 4,210 13,126 5,208 c 22,544
Other assets 17,274 6,559 5,673 b,c,d 29,506
-------- -------- -------- --------
$135,100 $102,178 $ 1,145 $238,423
======== ======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable $ 61,438 $ 15,349 ($ 12,570) d $ 64,217
Note payable to ARI 921 (921) a
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities 27,404 19,693 (3,964) a 43,133
Income taxes payable 1,829 205 2,034
Current portion of
long-term and
subordinated debt 22,531 4,200 26,731
-------- -------- -------- --------
114,123 39,447 (17,455) 136,115
Long-term and subordinated
debt 27,975 44,567 (937) d 71,605
Deferred income taxes 1,713 1,630 e 3,343
Minority interest 790 12,808 b,c,f 13,598
Redeemable common stock 1,406 1,406
Stockholders' equity (9,194) 16,451 5,099 d 12,356
-------- -------- -------- --------
$135,100 $102,178 $ 1,145 $238,423
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE> 55
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY AMERICAN RICE,
INC. (CONTINUED)
The results of operations from American Rice, Inc. will be consolidated with
ERLY Industries beginning June 1993. The following unaudited pro forma
results, however, have been prepared assuming the Transaction had occurred on
April 1, 1992.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ERLY American Eliminations Pro Forma
Industries Rice, and March 31,
Inc. Inc. Pro Forma 1993
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustments Notes (Unaudited)
------------ ------------ ----------- ----- -----------
(as restated) (in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $301,644 $176,619 ($ 37,076) a $441,187
Cost of sales 240,394 147,245 (36,798) a,b 350,841
-------- -------- --------- ---------
Gross profit 61,250 29,374 (278) 90,346
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 62,716 18,957 456 a 82,129
Interest expense 11,051 7,167 78 g 18,296
Interest income (700) (700)
Equity in earnings of ARI (1,560) 1,560 a
Write-down investment in
ARI attributed to property 3,190 3,190
Gain on partial investment
in Comet Rice sold to
minority interest (11,627) c (11,627)
Other (income) loss 2,100 505 a,b 2,605
-------- -------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before taxes
on income and minority
interest (15,547) 3,250 8,750 (3,547)
Taxes on income 414 414
-------- -------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) before
minority interest (15,961) 3,250 8,750 (3,961)
Loss of ARI applicable to
common stock allocated
to minority interest 8,129 h 8,129
--------- -------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) ($ 15,961) $ 3,250 $ 16,879 $ 4,168
========= ======== ========= =========
Net income (loss) per
common share ($ 4.63) $ 1.21
========= =========
Weighted average common
shares outstanding 3,444 3,444
========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Basis of Presentation. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements
are presented to illustrate (1) the pro forma effects of the Transaction on
ERLY's financial position as of March 31, 1993, as if the Transaction had
occurred on that date, and (2) operations for the year ended March 31, 1993, as
if the Transaction had occurred at April 1, 1992. However, in accordance with
the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding such pro forma
information, the extraordinary item (and the minority interest related thereto)
resulting from the debt forgiveness described in
53
<PAGE> 56
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY AMERICAN RICE,
INC. (CONTINUED)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Basis of Presentation (continued)
note d of this footnote is not presented. Such extraordinary item will result
in an extraordinary gain of $10,555 ($3.06 per common share), while the
minority interest in this extraordinary item will be $2,005 ($.58 per common
share).
ERLY owned 3,888,889 shares of ARI common stock and all of the 3,888,889
outstanding shares of ARI Series A Preferred Stock (having one vote per share),
or approximately 48% of the voting power of ARI. Under the terms of the
Transaction, ARI purchased all of the assets and assumed all of the liabilities
of Comet, except for the ARI stock owned by Comet, in exchange for all of the
14,000,000 shares of ARI Series B Preferred Stock (having two votes per share),
and ARI continued as the surviving corporation. As a result of the
Transaction, ERLY's ownership in ARI was increased from 48% to 81% of the
voting power of ARI.
The pro forma adjustments and eliminations include the following significant
items:
a. Elimination entries were recorded to eliminate intercompany transactions,
intercompany receivables and intercompany payables between ERLY, Comet and
ARI, and to eliminate ERLY's investment in ARI.
b. In April 1993, Comet sold its Harrisburg, Arkansas facility and its
interest in Aqaba Packaging Company as part of the refinancing of Comet
and ARI pursuant to the Transaction.
c. Since ERLY, the sole shareholder of Comet at the time of the Transaction,
will own the larger portion of the voting rights in the combined
corporation, the Transaction is accounted for as a reverse acquisition of
ARI by ERLY through its subsidiary, Comet, reflecting the change of
control that will occur. The fair value of ARI is estimated to be
approximately $35 million as determined by a valuation study performed by
an investment banking firm. The Transaction will be accounted for under
the guidelines of APB Opinion No. 16, "Business Combinations" and Emerging
Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 90-13, "Accounting for Simultaneous
Common Control Mergers".
The accounting consists of three steps: Step one consists of a
recognition by ARI of ERLY's historical cost of it's original 48%
interest. When ERLY purchased 48% of ARI in 1988 for $20 million, the
purchase price was $8.4 million greater than 48% of ARI stockholders'
equity. ERLY attributed the excess to ARI's 39 acres of land in Houston,
which excess was carried at $5.2 million at March 31, 1993. The $5.2
million excess attributed to the Houston property would be "pushed down"
or added to the book value of the Houston property on ARI books with a
corresponding increase in equity.
Step two recognizes the step acquisition by ERLY of an additional equity
interest in ARI of approximately 33 percent, in exchange for substantially
all of the assets of Comet and all of Comet's liabilities. In accordance
with EITF 90-13, Step 3 would fair value Comet's assets to the extent sold
to the shareholders of ARI. ERLY would account for the Transaction as a
partial sale of Comet Rice, Inc., and a partial acquisition of ARI,
increasing its ownership from 48% to 81%. Under EITF 90-13, a gain of
$11.6 million would be recognized by ERLY to the extent of the 19% of
Comet Rice sold.
54
<PAGE> 57
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - ACQUISITION OF COMET RICE, INC. BY AMERICAN RICE,
INC. (CONTINUED)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
d. The proceeds from new term lenders in the amount of $65.3 million were
used to retire substantially all of Comet's and ARI's long-term debt prior
to the Refinancing, and available cash and proceeds from a $47.5 million
credit line with a new revolving credit lender were used to retire all of
Comet's and ARI's revolving credit borrowings prior to the Refinancing.
As part of the Refinancing, ARI's former term lenders agreed to debt
discounts resulting in an extraordinary gain of approximately $10.5
million. In connection with the Refinancing, ARI's indebtedness to former
term lenders was partially satisfied by ERLY's issuance of a $3 million
term note.
e. Taxes on income from debt discount, net of estimated net operating loss
utilization.
f. The minority interest in ARI has been established in consolidation. This
reflects the acquisition of a 19% interest in Comet Rice at fair value,
plus 19% of: ARI historical equity, applicable pro forma adjustments and
debt discount.
g. The pro forma statement of operations reflects increased interest expense
due to higher interest rates as a result of the Refinancing, offset by
reduced interest expense related to the reduction in debt resulting from
the debt discounts provided by ARI's former lenders as discussed in noted
above. Interest rates are estimated to average approximately 11 percent
for the year ended March 31, 1993.
h. In the case where ownership of a subsidiary involves complex securities
like convertible preferred stocks in addition to common stocks, specific
rules under generally accepted accounting principles require that earnings
or losses of the subsidiary be allocated between the parent and the
minority interest in accordance with the underlying terms of the various
securities, rather than allocation based on voting ownership of the
subsidiary.
ARI's cumulative annual dividends of $5.2 million related to the Series B
Preferred Stock and $750,000 related to the Series C Preferred Stock are
deducted from ARI earnings to yield earnings or loss applicable to common
stock. The Series B Preferred Stock dividend is allocated entirely to
ERLY, while the Series C Preferred Stock dividend is allocated entirely
to minority interest.
The Series B and Series C Preferred Stock dividends are allocated to ERLY
and to the minority interest, respectively, even if this allocation
results in a loss being attributed to the common stock as these preferred
stock dividends are based on the underlying terms of the securities.
Similarly, these dividends are allocated even if not declared as the
dividends are cumulative.
The remaining earnings or losses applicable to common stock after deduction
of the preferred stock dividends is allocated in accordance with the
relative common stock ownership of ERLY (32%) and the minority interest
(68%).
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT IN AMERICAN RICE, INC.
Comet Rice, Inc. recorded its initial investment in American Rice, Inc. at its
cost of $20,000,000 at date of acquisition (April 1988). The cost was
allocated first to the 48% of ARI's equity ($11,610,000) acquired by Comet and
the remainder ($8,390,000) to Comet's 48% share of ARI's Houston property (See
Note 5). Operations of ARI for fiscal 1993 resulted in net income of
$3.3 million principally as a result of improvements in gross profits due to
lower rough rice prices and price increases in the Saudi Arabia market.
However, ARI has incurred substantial operating losses in fiscal 1992 and
1991. Prior to the Transaction and associated refinancing, ARI had a working
capital deficit of $38 million and was in default on all of its indebtedness.
One of ARI's lenders had posted notice to non-judicially foreclose on its
collateral, including ARI's Freeport facility, inventories and receivables, on
June 1, 1993.
The investment in ARI was accounted for under the equity method, and is
adjusted by Comet's 48% interest in the results of ARI's operations, which
resulted in income (loss) to Comet of $1,560,000, ($2,607,000) and ($2,772,000)
for the years ended March 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. An additional
loss of $3.2 million on the investment in ARI was recorded in 1993 to
write-down the portion of the investment attributed to the ARI Houston property
(See Notes 5 and 22). The carrying value of ERLY's investment in ARI at
March 31, 1993 was $13.1 million. Upon completion of the Transaction and the
increase in ERLY's ownership interest from 48% to 81%, ARI's financial
55
<PAGE> 58
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT IN AMERICAN RICE, INC. (CONTINUED)
statements will be consolidated with those of ERLY after appropriate purchase
accounting adjustments.
As of March 31, 1993, ARI's stock price was $.56 per share as quoted by
NASDAQ. The low price for the month was $.44 per share and the high price was
$.94 per share. ERLY's 3.9 million shares of ARI common stock would be worth
$2.2 million at a per share price of $.56. If ERLY converted its 3.9 million
shares of Series A preferred stock, ERLY's shares would be worth $4.4 million
at March 31, 1993 at $.56 per share, compared to a book value at that date of
$13.1 million. ERLY's Series A preferred shares have a $5.14 per share
preference in liquidation.
American Rice, Inc.'s condensed balance sheets follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, 1993 March 31, 1992
-------------- --------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets $ 46,050 $36,983
Property, plant and
equipment, net 35,522 37,794
Property held
for sale 13,126 13,141
Other assets 7,480 7,597
-------- -------
$102,178 $95,515
======== =======
Current liabilities $ 39,447 $82,314
Long-term debt and
deferred items 46,280
Stockholders' equity 16,451 13,201
-------- -------
$102,178 $95,515
======== =======
</TABLE>
American Rice, Inc.'s condensed statements of operations follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended Year ended Year ended
March 31, 1993 March 31, 1992 March 31, 1991
-------------- -------------- --------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $176,619 $176,201 $198,462
Cost of sales 147,245 158,036 178,333
-------- --------- ---------
Gross profit 29,374 18,165 20,129
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 18,957 17,287 19,882
Interest expense 7,167 6,310 6,255
-------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before
taxes on income 3,250 (5,432) (6,008)
Taxes on income (benefit) (231)
-------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ 3,250 ($ 5,432) ($ 5,777)
======== ========= =========
</TABLE>
In conjunction with the combination of Comet Rice and ARI in May 1993, ERLY
intends to conform ARI's inventory costing procedures to the first- in,
first-out (FIFO) method from the last-in, first-out method (LIFO), which is
consistent with Comet's accounting. If ARI had reported its results of
operations on a FIFO basis for the fiscal years ended March 31, 1993, 1992 and
1991, net income (loss) would have been $3,898,000, ($5,845,000) and
$1,425,000, respectively.
56
<PAGE> 59
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 - INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)
Investment income (loss) consists of the following for the years ended March
31, 1993, 1992 and 1991:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992 1991
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Equity in income (loss)
of American Rice, Inc. $ 1,560,000 ($2,607,000) ($2,772,000)
Write-down portion of
investment in ARI
attributed to Houston
property (3,190,000)
Decrease in reserve on
note receivable from
California CoPackers 1,000,000 2,000,000
Gain on sale of joint
venture interest in Kasco
Media Trading Company 3,000,000
----------- ----------- ----------
($ 1,630,000) ($1,607,000) $2,228,000
=========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
As discussed in Note 4, Comet originally attributed $8.4 million of its initial
investment in ARI to Comet's 48% share of ARI's Houston property. Based upon
an updated appraisal of the property which indicated a lower value for the
property than at the time of the original investment, the Company recorded a
$3.2 million write-down in 1993 of the portion of its investment in ARI
attributed to the Houston property (See Note 22). The excess is therefore
now carried at $5.2 million.
At March 31, 1991, the Company had an $11 million note receivable from
California CoPackers, the purchaser of the assets of Hansen Foods, a business
in which ERLY previously had a $24 million investment. At March 31, 1990 and
1989 the note was carried net of a $5 million reserve for loss established in
1989. The note was collateralized by the Hansen trademark license and certain
personal property. In 1991, California CoPackers provided ERLY with additional
collateral for the loan consisting of real property. The additional security
reduced the loss exposure on the note and the reserve for loss was therefore
reduced by $2,000,000 in 1991, resulting in an increase in the net carrying
value of the note to $8 million.
In July 1992, the assets and business, subject to certain liabilities, of
California CoPackers were purchased by a third party. In exchange for its $8
million net receivable (net of a $3 million reserve), ERLY received a cash
payment of $5.2 million and a $4 million note receivable (with an effective
interest rate of 8.41%, due in fiscal 1998), secured by the Hansen trademark
license. The loss exposure on the California CoPackers note was therefore
further reduced and the reserve for loss was reduced by $1,000,000 in 1992.
Effective March 1991, the Company sold its 50% interest in Kasco Media Trading
Company to its joint venture partner. In conjunction with the sale, amounts
payable by ERLY to the partnership in the amount of $3.4 million were canceled
and ERLY assumed a $400,000 note payable and received a $300,000 note from its
joint venture partner. This transaction resulted in a gain of $3,000,000.
57
<PAGE> 60
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- - - ------------------------------------------
NOTE 6 - EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS
The Company had the following extraordinary items for the years ended March 31,
1993 and 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Gain on extinguishment of debt
of rice facility $4,726,000 $ -
Gains on extinguishment of debt
related to ERLY Juice Inc. 2,562,000 4,436,000
---------- ----------
$7,288,000 $4,436,000
========== ==========
</TABLE>
Due to continuing operating losses resulting from low margins and uncertainty
about future U.S. rice exports, Comet ceased payments in January 1992 on a $16
million non-recourse obligation secured by its rice plant in Greenville,
Mississippi. In July 1992, the facility was sold through foreclosure sale and
in conjunction therewith, the Company eliminated the related non-recourse debt
of $16 million and the related property, plant and equipment. The disposition
of the facility was accounted for in accordance with: (1) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 15, "Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for
Troubled Debt Restructurings," and (2) Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No.
91-2, "Debtor's Accounting for Forfeiture of Real Estate Subject to a
Nonrecourse Mortgage."
These guidelines require a two-step approach in accounting for the disposition.
Prior to the disposition, the plant was written-down by $4,000,000 to its
estimated fair market value. This write-down is included in results of
operations prior to taxes on income and extraordinary items in the consolidated
statements of operations in fiscal 1993. Secondly, the difference between the
estimated fair market value of the facility and the amount of debt extinguished
(net of estimated shut-down and relocation expenses) resulted in a gain of
$4,726,000 on the extinguishment of debt which was recorded as extraordinary
income in fiscal 1993. The net gain on the transaction was therefore $726,000.
In February 1993, the Company entered into settlement arrangements with two
creditors of ERLY Juice whereby $3.1 million of debt and accrued interest was
satisfied in exchange for payments of $569,000. These transactions resulted in
a combined gain of $2,562,000 on extinguishment of debt which is reflected as
extraordinary income in fiscal 1993.
In fiscal year 1992, the Company entered into an agreement with a creditor
whereby ERLY exchanged $5.4 million of long-term debt for 300,000 shares of
redeemable ERLY common stock. This resulted in a gain of $4,436,000 on
extinguishment of debt which is reflected as extraordinary income. See Note
16.
NOTE 7 - NATURE OF THE BUSINESS - SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company's rice and juice operations are subject to significant fluctuations
due to wide variations in supply and demand and due to the impact, on an
international trading level, of such factors as the relative strength of the
United States dollar and governmental agricultural and trade policies.
Accordingly, the Company's results of operations will vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and from year to year. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses on export sales are not material as Comet requires all sales to
foreign customers, with the exception of a few well-established accounts, to be
payable in United States dollars by irrevocable letters of credit or confirmed
by a major bank prior to shipment.
58
<PAGE> 61
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 - NATURE OF THE BUSINESS - SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
The Company's revenues include export rice sales of $79.3 million or 26%,
$112.7 million or 32% and $115.2 million or 31% of consolidated sales for the
years ended March 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
In fiscal years 1988 to 1991, Comet's largest customer in the Middle East was
Iraq. Sales to Iraq were made directly to the Iraqi Grain Board, the official
buying agency for the Iraq government, or through a United States grain
exporter. Comet's sales to Iraq were $21.5 million for the year ended March
31, 1991, accounting for 6% of ERLY's consolidated sales during that year. All
Iraq sales were made using credit guaranties by the U.S. Government through the
GSM 102 and 103 Programs. In August 1990, the U.S. Government discontinued
extending such credit guaranties for rice exports to Iraq and imposed a total
embargo against any trade with Iraq. Consequently, Comet has exported no rice
to Iraq since June 30, 1990 and the volume and profitability of export sales
have been adversely affected from fiscal year 1991 through fiscal year 1993.
For fiscal year 1993, Middle East sales were up from fiscal year 1992
reflecting increased sales to Turkey which were aided by the U.S. Government
Export Enhancement Program ("EEP").
While the Food Security Act of 1985 originally only provided benefits for crops
produced through 1990, its provisions have been extended to crops produced
through 1995. There is no assurance that the currently favorable provisions
under this legislation will be extended into future periods or will not be
amended due to budgetary or other governmental constraints.
59
<PAGE> 62
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 - NATURE OF THE BUSINESS - SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
The Company's sales, operating profit and other financial data by industry
segment for the three years ended March 31, 1993 follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31
-----------------------------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
-------------- -------------- --------------
$ % $ % $ %
------ ---- ------ ----- ------ -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales (in thousands)
Export sales - Rice
Middle East $ 46,208 $ 31,181 $ 57,018
Caribbean 11,016 30,355 169
Europe 8,974 15,089 13,161
Africa 2,114 11,380 4,867
Far East 1,193 1,375 5,989
Canada 1,163 3,245 4,737
South America 51 9,953 17,401
Other 8,610 10,139 11,824
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
79,329 26% 112,717 32% 115,166 31%
Domestic sales
Rice 90,288 30 101,373 29 103,753 28
Juice 82,213 27 96,386 27 105,912 29
Consulting 37,185 12 31,035 9 20,414 6
Fire-Trol 12,629 5 10,163 3 13,445 4
Other 8,697 2
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
Total $301,644 100% $351,674 100% $367,387 100%
======== === ======== === ======== ===
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before taxes on income
Rice ($ 55) $ 4,882 $ 11,515
Juice (2,889) (6,574) 1,066
Consulting 1,536 1,669 307
Fire-Trol 1,532 623 2,342
Other (90)
-------- -------- --------
Operating profit 124 600 15,140
General corporate expense (1,091) (2,360) (1,196)
Interest expense (11,051) (14,920) (16,194)
Interest income 700 1,194 1,394
Investment income (loss) (1,630) (1,607) 2,228
Other income (loss)* (2,599) 594 939
-------- -------- --------
Total ($ 15,547) ($ 16,499) $ 2,311
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
* Fiscal year 1993 includes $1.4 million gain on sale of subsidiary and $4
million loss on write-down of rice facility.
60
<PAGE> 63
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- - - ------------------------------------------
NOTE 7 - NATURE OF BUSINESS - SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31
----------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Identifiable assets
Rice $ 74,325 $124,602 $143,102
Juice 45,897 54,234 65,889
Consulting 13,282 11,074 8,568
Fire-Trol 8,413 8,289 6,463
Discontinued operations 4,210* 7,339* 8,611*
Corporate 4,386 11,796 11,643
Intercompany eliminations (15,413) (20,608) (19,218)
-------- -------- --------
Total $135,100 $196,726 $225,059
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
* Net of reserve of $1.6 million, $2.2 million and $3.5 million at
March 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Depreciation and amortization
Rice $1,991 $2,814 $2,978
Juice 1,463 1,501 1,369
Consulting 202 193 127
Fire-Trol 510 488 404
Corporate 113 128 146
Other 99
------ ------ ------
Total $4,279 $5,124 $5,123
====== ====== ======
Capital expenditures
Rice $2,651 $ 772 $2,923
Juice 1,821 479 912
Consulting 455 250 104
Fire-Trol 273 801 575
Corporate 8
------ ------ ------
Total $5,200 $2,302 $4,522
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
NOTE 8 - INVENTORIES
A summary of inventories at March 31, 1993 and 1992 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $14,817,000 $30,625,000
Finished goods 12,908,000 20,777,000
----------- -----------
$27,725,000 $51,402,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
61
<PAGE> 64
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9 - LONG-TERM NOTES RECEIVABLE
Long-term notes receivable at March 31, 1993 and 1992 consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992
---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Note receivable from Hansen
Natural Corporation, due 1997,
interest at 8.41%, collateralized
by Hansen trademark license, net
of $200,000 reserve (1993) $3,800,000 $ -
Note receivable from California
CoPackers, interest at 10.9%,
collateralized by land and
Hansen trademark license,
net of $2,000,000 reserve (1992) 9,000,000
Note receivable from Aqaba
Packaging Company, a 49% owned
subsidiary of Comet, amounts
due to be deducted from
payments for future services,
non-interest bearing 1,592,000 1,641,000
Various 1,637,000 3,153,000
Less current portion of long-term
notes receivable (406,000) (7,440,000)
---------- -----------
$6,623,000 $ 6,354,000
========== ===========
</TABLE>
The Company had a note receivable from California CoPackers (the successor to
Hansen Foods) which was recorded at a net carrying amount of $9 million at
March 31, 1992. In July 1992, the assets and business, subject to certain
liabilities, of California CoPackers were purchased by a third party. In
exchange for its note, ERLY received a payment of $5.2 million (which paid down
bank debt as required by bank agreements) and a $4 million note receivable,
secured by the Hansen trademark license. The note has an effective interest
rate of 8.41% and is due in fiscal 1998.
Principal maturities on notes receivable are as follows: 1994--$406,000;
1995--$1,090,000; 1996--$ - ; 1997--$ - ; 1998--$3,800,000;
thereafter--$1,733,000.
NOTE 10 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of property, plant and equipment at March 31, 1993 and 1992 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land $ 980,000 $ 979,000
Buildings and improvements 10,730,000 10,817,000
Machinery and equipment 42,258,000 44,034,000
------------ ------------
53,968,000 55,830,000
Less accumulated depreciation
and amortization (23,111,000) (23,266,000)
------------ ------------
$ 30,857,000 $ 32,564,000
============ ============
</TABLE>
62
<PAGE> 65
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- - - ------------------------------------------
NOTE 10 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)
Due to continuing operating losses resulting from low margins and uncertainty
about future U.S. rice exports, Comet ceased payments in January 1992 on a $16
million non-recourse obligation secured by its rice plant in Greenville,
Mississippi. In July 1992, the facility was sold through foreclosure sale and
in conjunction therewith, the Company eliminated the related non-recourse debt
of $16 million, and property, plant and equipment of $14 million. To
facilitate analysis, these items were segregated in the consolidated balance
sheets for the year ended March 31, 1992. See Note 6 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for a discussion of the accounting treatment for the
disposal of this plant facility.
NOTE 11 - ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
The assets held for sale classified as long-term represent the Company's winery
operations which management intends to dispose of in an orderly manner.
The Company established a reserve of $7 million in 1989 to provide for
estimated losses on disposition of assets, and projected losses on discontinued
operations. The reserve was charged for $1 million in 1989 to write-off a past
due note receivable. In fiscal year 1990 the reserve increased by a net $1
million representing debt forgiveness credited to the reserve offset by
write-offs, operating losses and legal expenses. The reserve was charged for
$2.1 million in write-offs, operating losses and legal expenses relating to
discontinued operations and business restructuring in fiscal year 1991. In
1991, the reserve was also adjusted to eliminate reserves no longer considered
necessary and income from discontinued businesses of $1.4 million was recorded.
During 1992, the reserve was reduced by $1.3 million to record a loss on the
disposition of a facility previously included in assets held for sale and to
record other expenses related to discontinued businesses. During 1993, the
reserve was reduced by $607,000 to record losses from the discontinued wine
business including the loss on the disposition of a plant facility.
NOTE 12 - OTHER ASSETS
Other assets at March 31, 1993 and 1992 consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Trademarks and tradenames $ 6,434,000 $ 6,765,000
Investment in joint ventures 1,363,000 1,382,000
Deferred debt issue costs 2,767,000 2,774,000
Other 3,782,000 2,534,000
----------- -----------
14,346,000 13,455,000
Less accumulated amortization
of intangible assets (3,695,000) (3,091,000)
----------- -----------
$10,651,000 $10,364,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
63
<PAGE> 66
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 12 - OTHER ASSETS (CONTINUED)
The investment in joint ventures consists primarily of Comet's investment in
the Aqaba, Jordan rice finishing and packaging facility which experienced
losses during 1993 and 1992 due to under-utilization. Comet also had a $1.6
million note receivable from the joint venture (See Note 9). Comet has been
unable to realize a positive return on its investment while the Iraq embargo
has been in effect. As a result of and in conjunction with the refinancing of
Comet's debt prior to the Transaction between Comet and ARI, Comet sold its
interest in the Aqaba, Jordan rice mill in April 1993 (See Note 21).
Included in other assets at March 31, 1993 and 1992 are $1,954,000 and
$1,256,000 of costs associated with the combination of Comet Rice, Inc. and
American Rice, Inc.
NOTE 13 - NOTES PAYABLE
The Company and its subsidiaries have utilized short-term lines of credit with
commercial banks in addition to other short-term loans. Interest expense on
notes payable to banks and on other short-term borrowings amounted to
$5,856,000 (1993), $7,612,000 (1992) and $6,777,000 (1991).
A comparison of information relating to the Company's lines of credit for the
years ended March 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992 1991
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Average during the year:
Short-term borrowings $69,238,000 $78,775,000 $61,319,000
Weighted average interest
rate* 8.10% 8.90% 10.60%
Average bank prime rate 6.13% 7.71% 9.79%
At March 31:
Lines of credit, subject to
collateral availability $82,850,000 $84,514,000 $87,154,000
Short-term borrowings $62,359,000 $78,696,000 $77,362,000
Average interest rate 7.52% 7.81% 9.68%
Bank prime rate 6.00% 6.50% 9.00%
Unused short-term
borrowing capacity $ 800,000 $ 2,264,000 $ 3,134,000
Maximum month-end short-term
borrowings during the year $76,454,000 $79,600,000 $79,047,000
</TABLE>
*Based on outstanding borrowings
Substantially all receivables, inventories, property, plant and equipment and
the capital stock of Comet Rice, Inc., ERLY Juice Inc., Chemonics Industries,
Inc., and American Rice, Inc. (purchased by Comet as an investment) are pledged
as collateral on notes payable and certain other long-term obligations.
64
<PAGE> 67
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 13 - NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)
The Company's subsidiaries were in violation of certain debt covenants at March
31, 1993, principally minimum net worth and working capital requirements. The
combination of Comet Rice and American Rice in May 1993 and the associated
refinancing eliminated the violations at Comet Rice and ARI (See Note 3).
Negotiations are in process with the Company's lenders regarding a
restructuring of ERLY Juice's debt. Because of substantial losses at ERLY
Juice since 1991, if the current restructuring efforts are not successful, the
Company may consider various alternatives including the sale or discontinuation
of ERLY Juice. Negotiations are also under way to provide a temporary
increased working capital facility for Chemonics and are expected to be
completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 1994.
NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is composed of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31
---------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
-------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Currently payable
Federal $ - $ - $ -
State 35,000 60,000 9,000
Foreign 379,000 416,000 442,000
-------- -------- --------
Total provision $414,000 $476,000 $451,000
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The reconciliation of the Company's effective tax rate on continuing operations
to the normal federal tax rate is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31
----------------------------
1993 1992 1991
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal rate (34%) (34%) 34%
Foreign taxes 4 3 19
State taxes 1
Current year operating
loss not tax benefitted 34 34
Prior year operating
losses tax benefitted
in current year (34)
-- -- --
Effective tax rate 4% 3% 20%
== == ==
</TABLE>
The pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations (before discontinued
operations and extraordinary items) related to domestic and foreign operations
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31
--------------------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
------------ ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Domestic ($13,042,000) ($17,337,000) $1,448,000
Foreign 685,000 838,000 863,000
------------ ------------ ----------
Total ($12,357,000) ($16,499,000) $2,311,000
============ ============ ==========
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE> 68
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
In 1993 the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", effective April 1, 1992.
SFAS No. 109 requires the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes, under which deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax
consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates
applicable to future years to differences between financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The cumulative
effect of this accounting change on prior years was zero. The Company has not
recognized the benefit of any net operating loss carryforwards as a result of
adopting SFAS No. 109.
The Company and certain subsidiaries file consolidated federal income and
combined state franchise tax returns. The Company has, for financial reporting
purposes, net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $44 million and,
for tax reporting purposes, net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$48 million, which expire at various dates through 2008. The difference
between the financial and tax net operating loss carryforwards result primarily
from temporary differences attributable to depreciation, provisions for losses
and investments in non-consolidated entities in the amounts of ($15 million),
$6 million and $2 million, respectively. The Company has established a
valuation allowance equal to the total amount of the net deferred tax assets.
The Company's income tax returns for fiscal years 1979 through 1989 are
currently under examination by tax authorities. The tax authorities have
issued notices of proposed assessments for certain of those years. The Company
has formally protested various positions taken by the tax authorities and
believes that a majority of the Company's positions will be upheld. A portion
of the net operating loss carryforwards may be utilized for additional taxes
assessed. Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have
been made and that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial position.
66
<PAGE> 69
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 15 - LONG-TERM AND SUBORDINATED DEBT
A schedule of outstanding long-term and subordinated debt at March 31, 1993 and
1992 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1992
------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Long-term debt:
Term loans due 1993, interest
at bank prime rate plus 1.5% $15,225,000 $18,125,000
Term loan due 1993, interest
at bank prime rate plus 2% 6,493,000 6,750,000
Term loan due 1993,
interest at 22% 5,245,000 4,245,000
Note payable on juice facility,
interest at 10%, maturities based
on volume 3,100,000 3,100,000
Note payable on juice facility,
interest at 13.5%, maturities
through 1999 1,101,000 1,000,000
Term loan due 1993, interest
at bank prime rate plus 2.25% 1,000,000 2,400,000
Note payable to officer, due 1994,
interest at bank prime rate plus 2% 1,000,000 1,216,000
Various obligations with maturities
to 2000, interest rates ranging from
10% to 15% 2,401,000 6,190,000
Deferred trade payables to supplier 5,000,000 5,000,000
Less current portion of
long-term debt (13,684,000 (33,304,000)
----------- -----------
$26,881,000 $14,722,000
=========== ===========
Subordinated debt:
12-1/2% subordinated sinking fund
debentures, net of unamortized
discount of $89,000 (1993) and
$152,000 (1992), due 1993 $ 8,847,000 $10,151,000
Note payable on rice facility,
maturities through 1997,
non-interest bearing 1,094,000 988,000
Less current portion of
subordinated debt (8,847,000 (1,501,000)
----------- -----------
$ 1,094,000 $ 9,638,000
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Bond discount related to the 12 1/2% subordinated sinking fund debentures
issued in 1978 is being amortized over the 15-year life of the debentures.
67
<PAGE> 70
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 15 - LONG-TERM AND SUBORDINATED DEBT (CONTINUED)
Certain of the Company's and subsidiaries' long-term debt agreements require
maintenance of minimum amounts or ratios related to working capital, long-term
debt and net worth, in addition to the observance of other covenants. These
restrictions also preclude the payment of cash dividends. The Company's
subsidiaries were in violation of certain debt covenants at March 31, 1993.
The combination of Comet Rice and American Rice in May 1993 and associated
refinancing eliminated the violations at Comet Rice and ARI (See Note 3).
Negotiations are in process with the Company's lenders to restructure ERLY
Juice's debt and to provide a temporary increased working capital facility for
Chemonics. Both negotiations are expected to be completed in fiscal year 1994.
ERLY Juice, under the terms of its borrowing agreement, did not have to make
principal payments in fiscal year 1993.
As part of the Comet and ARI Refinancing, ARI received $47.5 million in credit
lines from a new revolving credit lender and loans from new term lenders for
$65.3 million. The $47.5 million credit line expires in May 1995, carries an
interest rate of prime plus 2%, and is collateralized by receivables,
inventory, cash and junior liens on ARI assets pledged to the new term lenders.
The $65.3 million term loans mature on December 31, 1997 with annual principal
repayments required of $4.2 million, $5.9 million, $5.9 million, $5.9 million
and $43.4 million in fiscal years ending March 31, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 and
1998, respectively. Interest rates range from prime plus 3% to prime plus 5%
through May 1995, increasing to a range of prime plus 6% to prime plus 8% by
1997. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 6,
"Classification of Short-Term Obligations Expected To Be Refinanced", the Comet
debt refinanced is classified as long-term at March 31, 1993. Terms of the
loan restrict dividend payments, investments, capital expenditures and require
maintenance of certain working capital levels, leverage and net worth. These
loans are collateralized by substantially all of ARI's fixed assets and
trademarks and have junior liens on collateral for the credit lines.
In addition, ERLY is a guarantor for all of the new ARI debt and the loan
agreements contain certain restrictive covenants applicable to ERLY.
Consequently, the new ARI debt contains cross default provisions with the debt
of ERLY. ARI has capitalized approximately $5 million of costs in connection
with the loan restructure.
Principal maturities on ERLY's long-term and subordinated debt are as follows:
1994--$22,531,000; 1995--$7,340,000; 1996--$6,465,000;
1997--$6,274,000; 1998--$3,234,000; thereafter--$4,662,000.
Interest expense on long-term and subordinated debt amounted to $5,195,000
(1993), $7,308,000 (1992) and $9,417,000 (1991).
NOTE 16 - REDEEMABLE COMMON STOCK
In fiscal 1992, ERLY issued 300,000 shares of ERLY common stock in exchange for
$5.4 million of debt (See Note 6). In conjunction with this transaction, ERLY
entered into an agreement to repurchase all of such stock at a price of $6 per
share, at the option of the stockholder, over a four-year period beginning
January 1, 1994. These shares are classified as redeemable common stock in the
consolidated balance sheets. At issuance, the shares were recorded at their
fair market value of $1,012,000. The difference between the fair value of the
common stock at issuance and its redemption value is being accreted to
redeemable common stock over the redemption period through charges to equity
which amounted to $394,000 in 1993.
68
<PAGE> 71
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 17 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Under the Company's 1982 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 250,000 shares of common
stock were reserved for the granting of options to key employees. The purchase
price for shares may not be less than the market value of the shares at the
date of grant. The options are exercisable 25% a year over a four-year period
beginning one year after the date of issuance. Options generally expire ten
years from the date of grant. The following table summarizes the activity in
stock options under the Plan for 1993, 1992 and 1991:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Exercise Price
Options Per Option
--------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at April 1, 1990 156,659 $3.73 - $4.51
Granted -
Exercised -
Cancelled or expired (9,317) $4.51
-------
Outstanding at March 31, 1991 147,342 $3.73 - $4.51
Granted -
Exercised -
Cancelled or expired -
-------
Outstanding at March 31, 1992 147,342 $3.73 - $4.51
Granted -
Exercised -
Cancelled or expired (24,158) $4.35
-------
Outstanding at March 31, 1993 123,184 $3.73 - $4.51
=======
Exercisable at March 31, 1993 123,184
=======
</TABLE>
At March 31, 1993, the Company has outstanding warrants issued in conjunction
with certain financing and restructuring agreements to purchase approximately
288,000 shares of ERLY common stock. The warrants are exercisable at prices
ranging from $.01 to $6.80 per share, subject to adjustment, and expire from
1993 to 1995.
Six thousand shares of $100 par value preferred stock are presently authorized
but unissued.
NOTE 18 - PROFIT-SHARING PLAN
The Company has a defined contribution profit-sharing plan covering
substantially all of its employees. Contributions to the plan are determined
annually at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Total profit-sharing
plan expense was $410,000 (1993), $412,000 (1992) and $759,000 (1991).
NOTE 19 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is involved in litigation in the ordinary course of business. It
is the opinion of management that resolution of such litigation will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
69
<PAGE> 72
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 19 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
The Company's Chemonics subsidiary has operated in the chemical and pesticide
business and has potential liability for the correction of environmental
contamination relating to certain of its property. Chemonics has contracted
with an independent laboratory to perform sample testing and provide
consultation to assess various cleanup options available. The estimated costs
of such remedies are not presently determinable because the extent and scope of
the cleanup required is unknown and the method by which such cleanup can be
accomplished is under investigation. Management does not believe, however,
that the costs associated with this matter will have a material adverse effect
on the financial condition of the Company.
The Company and its subsidiaries are obligated under operating leases for plant
facilities and equipment. Aggregate minimum rental commitments under operating
leases with noncancellable terms of more than one year are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ending March 31
- - - --------------------
<S> <C>
1994 $ 3,155,000
1995 2,678,000
1996 2,241,000
1997 1,716,000
1998 1,459,000
Thereafter 14,627,000
-----------
$25,876,000
===========
</TABLE>
Included in minimum rental commitments is an assumed $360,000 per year on
certain rice drying and storage facilities where rental payments are based on
rice milling volume. Rental expense resulting from this milling volume factor
was $360,000 in 1993, 1992 and 1991.
Total rental expense amounted to $3,313,000 (1993), $2,990,000 (1992) and
$2,772,000 (1991). Certain leases provide for options to renew and for payment
of taxes, insurance and maintenance costs.
NOTE 20 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In August 1989, ERLY entered into a management agreement with ARI, under which
ERLY was paid a monthly management fee of $25,000 for certain marketing,
operating and management services. The management agreement expired in August
1992. ERLY recorded management fee income of $119,000 (1993), $300,000 (1992)
and $300,000 (1991). At March 31, 1992, ERLY had a $100,000 receivable from
ARI for management fees. No amount was due at March 31, 1993. In addition,
ERLY had a $921,000 note payable to ARI at March 31, 1993 and 1992. The note
was due April 1, 1993 and bears interest at prime plus 2%. As a result of the
Comet and ARI combination, the note payable to ARI was combined with amounts
owed to Comet Rice. The total amount payable to ARI after the May 1993
combination is approximately $10 million and is payable from dividends to be
received from ARI.
Comet Rice purchases milled and rough rice from ARI, and sells milled and rough
rice to ARI. Management believes that all such transactions with ARI are
conducted at prevailing market rates or rates that are based on production cost
formulas. Comet's net sales include sales of milled rice to ARI of $8.9
million, $27.8 million and $26.8 million for the years ended March 31, 1993,
1992 and 1991, respectively. Purchases from
70
<PAGE> 73
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 20 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
ARI amounted to $5.4 million, $17.5 million and $9.0 million for the years
ended March 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. As a result of transactions
with ARI in the ordinary course of business, Comet had a net receivable from
ARI of $4.2 million and $7.2 million at March 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively,
included in notes and accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
In December 1989, Comet entered into an agreement with ARI to provide certain
sales services to ARI with respect to ARI's operations in Puerto Rico with a
50% profit participation on sales between Comet and ARI. This agreement was
terminated effective December 31, 1991 and ARI conducts its own business in
Puerto Rico.
In January 1990, ERLY Juice entered into an arrangement with ARI, to provide
certain marketing, sales, credit and general management services to ARI's Comet
American Marketing Division (CAM) operations. As a result of this arrangement,
nearly all employees of CAM became employees of ERLY Juice. ERLY Juice
receives a monthly fee from ARI for its services. During the years ended March
31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, ERLY Juice recorded fees of $1.9 million, $1.9 million
and $1.6 million, respectively. ERLY Juice had a net (payable) receivable with
ARI of ($42,000) and $60,000 at March 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
As part of the Transaction, ARI and the Company have entered into a management
agreement. This agreement recognizes that ARI will be part of ERLY's group of
affiliated companies and as such will participate in the benefits of the
overall management and administrative expertise of ERLY as well as planning by
ERLY's corporate management to assist in developing a comprehensive, global
business plan; raw product supply development; new market development
financing; and assistance and advice on ARI's insurance plans, human resources
programs and policies.
The $900,000 annual fee will be paid monthly and will be adjusted annually
based on the most recent published Consumer Price Index. The agreement is for
a period of two years with two-year automatic renewals unless one party
notifies the other that it wishes to terminate the agreement.
The Company believes that the fee is as favorable as might have been obtained
from a non-affiliated party, however because of its uniqueness, a comparison to
possible arrangements to parties who are not affiliated with ARI is not
available.
NOTE 21 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In April 1993, Comet Rice sold its Harrisburg, Arkansas drying and storage
facility and its interest in Aqaba Packaging Company as part of the refinancing
of Comet and ARI pursuant to the Transaction. Both generated cash to reduce
financing requirements at the closing of the Transaction.
In July 1993, ERLY Juice sold its primary orange juice processing plant in
Lakeland, Florida to Florida Juice, Inc. for $11.9 million. This sale is part
of a restructuring of ERLY Juice to reduce operating losses. In conjunction
with this restructuring, one of ERLY Juice's primary creditors agreed to
discount term debt and accounts payable obligations in exchange for cash. The
combined effect of both transactions did not result in a loss and will be
accounted for in fiscal year 1994. The sale of the plant facility resulted in
a loss of $2.7 million before tax effects while the gain from debt forgiveness
(which will be reflected as an extraordinary item) amounted to $5.6 million
before tax.
71
<PAGE> 74
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 22 - 1993 Restatement
Fiscal year 1993 has been restated to reflect a $3,190,000 write-down
of investment in ARI attributed to Houston property (See Notes 4 and 5).
The effect of this restatement is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Previously
Reported As Restated
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Stockholders' equity
(deficit) at March 31, 1993 ($6,004,000) ($9,194,000)
Net loss for 1993 ($5,483,000) ($8,673,000)
Net loss per share for 1993 ($1.59) ($2.52)
</TABLE>
NOTE 23 - QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year 1993
(In thousands except per share data)
------------------------------------------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter* Quarter Quarter Total
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $93,909 $81,934 $64,595 $61,206 $301,644
Gross profit 18,297 17,524 15,511 9,918 61,250
Income (loss) from
continuing operations 918 (3,402) (1,956) (11,521) (15,961)
Extraordinary income 4,726 2,562 7,288
Net income (loss) 918 1,324 (1,956) (8,959) (8,673)
Income (loss) per share from
continuing operations .27 (.99) (.57) (3.31) (4.63)
Extraordinary income per share 1.38 .74 2.11
Net income (loss) per share .27 .39 (.57) (2.57) (2.52)
Weighted average shares
outstanding 3,430 3,430 3,438 3,480 3,444
Price range of common stock:
High $3-3/8 $2-5/8 $4-1/4 $4-3/4
Low 1-7/8 1-1/2 1-1/2 2-7/8
</TABLE>
* Restated. The Company originally recorded extraordinary income in the second
quarter of fiscal 1993 of $5,023 on the extinguishment of debt related to the
Greenville, Mississippi rice facility (See Note 6). This gain was based on
best estimates available at the time and when the fiscal determination was
computed it was determined that the actual gain was in excess of the original
estimate by $297 and therefore the extraordinary gain on the transaction was
reduced to $4,726 for the second quarter.
Significant items increasing (decreasing) net income for the fourth quarter of
1993 are as follows: write-down of a portion of ERLY's investment in ARI
relating to Houston property - ($3,190); extraordinary income on extinguishment
of debt related to ERLY Juice - $2,562; gain on sale of subsidiary - $1,392;
increase in allowances for doubtful accounts - ($2,000); write-down of year-end
inventories by ERLY Juice - ($945); and, accounts payable adjustment by ERLY
Juice -($1,000).
72
<PAGE> 75
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 23 - QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year 1992
(In thousands except per share data)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $77,422 $98,465 $90,288 $85,499 $351,674
Gross profit 14,280 16,586 14,402 16,431 61,699
Income (loss) from
continuing operations (4,453) (3,464) (4,881) (4,177) (16,975)
Extraordinary income 4,436 4,436
Net income (loss) (4,453) (3,464) (4,881) 259 (12,539)
Income (loss) per share from
continuing operations (1.43) (1.11) (1.56) (1.33) (5.43)
Extraordinary income per share 1.41 1.42
Net income (loss) per share (1.43) (1.11) (1.56) .08 (4.01)
Weighted average shares
outstanding 3,113 3,124 3,126 3,147 3,127
Price range of common stock:
High $8-1/2 $7-1/4 $6-1/4 $4-1/2
Low 6-7/8 5-1/2 3-3/8 2-7/8
</TABLE>
Significant items increasing (decreasing) net income for the fourth quarter of
1992 are as follows: reduction in loss reserve on note receivable - $1,000;
extraordinary income on extinguishment of debt related to ERLY Juice - $4,436;
write-down of year-end inventories by Comet Rice - ($863); and, write-down of
year-end inventories and accounts receivable by ERLY Juice - ($1,600).
73
<PAGE> 76
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors
ERLY Industries Inc.
Los Angeles, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ERLY Industries
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") at March 31, 1993 and 1992, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1993. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at
Item 14. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of ERLY Industries Inc. and
subsidiaries at March 31, 1993 and 1992, and the results of their operations
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1993,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred substantial
operating losses in each of the two years ended March 31, 1993, has a
consolidated working capital deficit of approximately $44 million and has a
consolidated deficiency in assets at March 31, 1993. In addition, the Company
is in default on certain of its bank debt covenants. These conditions raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plan is described in Note 2. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in May 1993
the Company consummated a transaction whereby it increased its ownership in
American Rice, Inc. ("ARI") from 48% to 81% of the voting power of ARI stock in
exchange for substantially all of the assets, subject to all of the
liabilities, of its wholly owned subsidiary, Comet Rice, Inc. In May 1993, the
Company also refinanced the combined indebtedness of ARI and Comet.
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, in 1993 the
Company changed its method of accounting for income taxes.
As discussed in Notes 4, 5 and 22, the 1993 consolidated financial statements
have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a $3,190,000
write-down of investment in ARI attributed to Houston property.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
July 8, 1994
Los Angeles, California
74
<PAGE> 77
ITEM 14(A)2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
SCHEDULE III - CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31,
--------------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Corporate overhead expenses ($ 1,091) ($ 2,360) ($ 1,196)
Income from subsidiaries 1,037 700 541
Interest expense (1,517) (1,833) (2,108)
Interest income 220 739 714
Other income 9 594 939
Income on investments 1,000 5,000
------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before taxes on income
and discontinued operations (1,342) (1,160) 3,890
Taxes on income (benefit) (a) 2 (64)
------- ------- -------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before discontinued operations (1,344) (1,160) 3,954
Discontinued operations:
Provision for (losses) credit on
discontinued businesses - - 1,400
------- ------- --------
Net income (loss) before undistributed
earnings (losses) of subsidiaries (1,344) (1,160) 5,354
Undistributed earnings (losses)
of subsidiaries (7,329) (11,379) (2,094)
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) ($ 8,673) ($12,539) $ 3,260
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
(a) Reflects tax sharing benefit for subsidiaries in 1991.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
75
<PAGE> 78
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
SCHEDULE III - CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31,
-----------------------
1993 1992
------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 26 ($ 198)
Notes and accounts receivable, net 298 6,189
Other current assets 291 5
------- -------
Total current assets 615 5,996
Long-term notes receivable 4,890 4,982
Property, plant and equipment, net 6 10
Investment in subsidiaries* 392 6,085
Other assets 31 84
------- -------
$ 5,934 $17,157
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable $ 921 $ 1,455
Other current liabilities 2,953 3,301
Current portion of long-term
and subordinated debt 8,847 1,305
-------- -------
Total current liabilities 12,721 6,061
Long-term debt 1,001 1,216
Subordinated debt 8,847
Redeemable common stock 1,406 1,012
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock 3,187 3,130
Additional paid-in capital 12,687 12,993
Retained earnings (deficit) (24,119) (15,446)
Cumulative foreign currency
adjustments (949) (656)
------- -------
Total stockholders' equity (9,194) 21
------- -------
$ 5,934 $17,157
======= =======
</TABLE>
* Recorded at equity in net assets of subsidiaries.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
76
<PAGE> 79
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
SCHEDULE III - CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31,
------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) ($8,673) ($12,539) $ 3,260
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Undistributed (earnings) losses
of subsidiaries 7,329 11,379 2,094
Depreciation and amortization 113 128 146
Provision for loss on receivables (250) 250
Income on investments (1,000) (5,000)
Provision for losses (credit) on
discontinued businesses (1,400)
Change in assets and liabilities
net of effects of acquisition
and sale of businesses:
Decrease (increase) in receivables 941 370 (1,674)
(Increase) decrease in other
current assets (286) 58
Decrease in assets held for sale 1,379
Increase (decrease) in notes payable
and other current liabilities (882) 1,100 (280)
-------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES (1,708) 1,125 (2,854)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Payment on note receivable from
California CoPackers 5,200
Distributions (to) from subsidiaries (1,885) (275) (558)
Payments on notes receivable
related to Hansen Foods 1,000
Other, net 46 218 356
------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES 3,361 (57) 798
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on long-term debt (214) (81)
Principal payments on subordinated debt (1,360) (1,360) (1,360)
Proceeds from sale of stock 145 27 15
Loans from subsidiaries 3,500
-------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES (1,429) (1,414) 2,155
-------- ------- -------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH DURING THE YEAR 224 (346) 99
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR (198) 148 49
-------- ------- -------
CASH, END OF YEAR $ 26 ($ 198) $ 148
======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
77
<PAGE> 80
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at Balance at
beginning Additions Retirements end of
Description of period at cost or sales Other (a) period
- - - ----------- ---------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year ended
March 31, 1993
- - - --------------
Land $ 979,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 980,000
Buildings and
improvements 10,817,000 111,000 (124,000) (74,000) 10,730,000
Machinery and
equipment 44,034,000 5,089,000 (6,901,000) 36,000 42,258,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
55,830,000 5,200,000 (7,025,000) (37,000) 53,968,000
Rice facility
disposed in
July 1992 21,828,000 (21,828,000)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $77,658,000 $ 5,200,000 ($28,853,000) ($ 37,000) $53,968,000
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Year ended
March 31, 1992
- - - --------------
Land $ 1,236,000 $ - $ - ($ 257,000) $ 979,000
Buildings and
improvements 17,210,000 393,000 (27,000) (6,759,000) 10,817,000
Machinery and
equipment 57,552,000 1,909,000 (411,000) (15,016,000) 44,034,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
75,998,000 2,302,000 (438,000) (22,032,000) 55,830,000
Rice facility
disposed in
July 1992 21,828,000 21,828,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $75,998,000 $ 2,302,000 ($ 438,000) ($ 204,000) $77,658,000
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Year ended
March 31, 1991
- - - --------------
Land $ 1,236,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,236,000
Buildings and
improvements 16,867,000 342,000 (3,000) 4,000 17,210,000
Machinery and
equipment 53,990,000 4,180,000 (656,000) 38,000 57,552,000
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $72,093,000 $4,522,000 ($ 659,000) $ 42,000 $75,998,000
=========== ========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
(a) Includes (1) adjustments relating to application of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, "Foreign Currency
Translation", and (2) reclassification in 1992 of assets relating to
the Greenville, Mississippi rice facility to segregate as a separate
caption.
78
<PAGE> 81
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VI - ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION
AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
Balance at charged to Balance at
beginning costs and Retirements end of
Description of period expenses or sales Other (a) period
- - - ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year ended
March 31, 1993
- - - --------------
Buildings and
improvements $ 2,606,000 $ 497,000 ($ 3,000) $ 14,000 $ 3,114,000
Machinery and
equipment 20,660,000 2,953,000 (3,498,000) (118,000) 19,997,000
----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- -----------
23,266,000 3,450,000 (3,501,000) (104,000) 23,111,000
Rice facility
disposed in
July 1992 7,797,000 (7,797,000)
----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Total $31,063,000 $3,450,000 ($11,298,000) ($ 104,000) $23,111,000
=========== ========== =========== ========== ===========
Year ended
March 31, 1992
- - - --------------
Buildings and
improvements $ 3,398,000 $ 616,000 ($ 127,000) ($1,281,000) $ 2,606,000
Machinery and
equipment 23,621,000 3,769,000 (159,000) (6,571,000) 20,660,000
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
27,019,000 4,385,000 (286,000) (7,852,000) 23,266,000
Rice facility
disposed in
July 1992 7,797,000 7,797,000
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Total $27,019,000 $4,385,000 ($ 286,000) ($ 55,000) $31,063,000
=========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
Year ended
March 31, 1991
- - - --------------
Buildings and
improvements $ 2,824,000 $ 572,000 $ - $ 2,000 $ 3,398,000
Machinery and
equipment 20,027,000 3,936,000 (361,000) 19,000 23,621,000
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Total $22,851,000 $4,508,000 ($ 361,000) $ 21,000 $27,019,000
=========== ========== ========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
(a) Includes (1) adjustments relating to application of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation",
and (2) reclassification in 1992 of accumulated depreciation relating
to the Greenville, Mississippi rice facility to segregate as a
separate caption.
79
<PAGE> 82
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
SCHEDULE VIII - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
-------------------------
Balance at Charges to Charges Deductions Balance at
beginning costs and to other from end of
Description of period expenses accounts reserves(a) period
- - - ----------- --------- ---------- -------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year ended
March 31, 1993
- - - --------------
Allowance for
doubtful accounts $ 956,000 $2,474,000 ($ 34,000) ($ 116,000) $3,280,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Reserve for notes
receivable $2,000,000 ($1,800,000) $ 200,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Reserve for
discontinued
businesses $2,189,000 ($ 607,000) $1,582,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Year ended
March 31, 1992
- - - --------------
Allowance for
doubtful accounts $ 748,000 $ 883,000 ($ 14,000) ($ 661,000) $ 956,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Reserve for notes
receivable $3,000,000 ($1,000,000) $2,000,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Reserve for
discontinued
businesses $3,455,000 ($1,266,000) $2,189,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Year ended
March 31, 1991
- - - --------------
Allowance for
doubtful accounts $ 339,000 $ 543,000 $ 155,000 ($ 289,000) $ 748,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Reserve for notes
receivable $5,000,000 - - ($2,000,000) $3,000,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Reserve for
discontinued
businesses $7,024,000 - - ($3,569,000) $3,455,000
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(a) Uncollectible accounts written off to allowance for doubtful accounts;
reduction of reserve for notes receivable in 1993, 1992 and 1991; and,
charges to restructure reserve for discontinued businesses.
80
<PAGE> 83
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE X - SUPPLEMENTARY INCOME STATEMENT INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31,
------------------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Maintenance and repairs $2,734,000 $4,155,000 $6,122,000
Amortization of intangible
assets (A) (A) (A)
Taxes, other than payroll
and income taxes:
Property taxes (A) (A) (A)
Other taxes (A) (A) (A)
Advertising costs (A) (A) (A)
</TABLE>
(A) Amounts are not presented as they do not exceed one percent of sales.
81
<PAGE> 84
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, ERLY Industries Inc. has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
By /s/ Gerald D. Murphy
---------------------------------------
Gerald D. Murphy, Chairman of the Board
(Chief Executive Officer)
By /s/ Richard N. McCombs
---------------------------------------
Richard N. McCombs, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting Officer)
Date: July 8, 1994
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of ERLY
Industries Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
/s/ Gerald D. Murphy /s/ Douglas A. Murphy
- - - --------------------------- ----------------------------
Gerald D. Murphy, Director Douglas A. Murphy, Director
/s/ Bill J. McFarland /s/ William H. Burgess
- - - --------------------------- ----------------------------
Bill J. McFarland, Director William H. Burgess, Director
82
<PAGE> 85
EXHIBIT I
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended March 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income (loss) from
continuing operations ($15,961) ($16,975) $ 1,860 $ 308 ($ 3,009)
Income from extraordinary
items 7,288 4,436
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations 147 (5,032)
Provision for (losses)
credit on discontinued
businesses 1,400 (7,000)
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Net income (loss) ($ 8,673) ($12,539) $ 3,260 $ 455 ($15,041)
======== ======== ======= ======= ========
Average number of shares
of common stock and
common stock equivalents
outstanding*:
Average number of
shares of common
stock outstanding 3,444 3,127 3,089 3,029 2,892
Common stock equivalents:
Dilutive effect of
stock options after
application of treasury
stock method (1)
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Total 3,444 3,127 3,089 3,029 2,892
======== ======== ======= ======= ========
Primary and fully
diluted income (loss)
per common share*:
Income (loss) from
continuing operations ($ 4.63) ($ 5.43) $ .61 $ .10 ($ 1.04)
Income from extraordinary
items 2.11 1.42
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations .05 (1.74)
Provision for (losses)
credit on discontinued
businesses .45 (2.42)
-------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Primary and fully diluted
income (loss) per common share ($ 2.52) ($ 4.01) $ 1.06 $ .15 ($ 5.20)
======== ======== ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
* Retroactively adjusted to give effect to 10% stock dividends in
September 1990, November 1989 and October 1988.
(1) The dilutive effect of stock options and warrants was less than 3%;
therefore, none are shown above.
83
<PAGE> 86
EXHIBIT II
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
SUBSIDIARIES
The following is a list of all parents and principal subsidiaries of the
Company reflecting ownership and the state or country of incorporation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
% of Voting
Securities
Parent Subsidiaries Owned
- - - ------ ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C>
ERLY Industries Inc. Comet Rice, Inc. 100%
(California) (Texas)
ERLY Juice Inc. 100%
(California)
Chemonics Industries, Inc. 100%
(Arizona)
The Beverage Source Inc. 100%
(California)
Worldmark, Inc. 100%
(Michigan)
Comet Rice, Inc. Comet Rice of Puerto Rico, Inc. 100%
(Texas) (Delaware)
Comet Ventures, Inc. 90%
(California)
Bulk Terminal and Transport, Inc. 72%
(Cayman Islands)
Aqaba Packing Company 49%
(Jordan)
American Rice, Inc. 48%
(Texas)
</TABLE>
84
<PAGE> 87
EXHIBIT II (CONTINUED)
ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
% of Voting
Securities
Parent Subsidiaries Owned
- - - ------ ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Worldmark, Inc. Eau Claire Packing Co. 100%
(Michigan) (Michigan)
Chemonics Industries, Inc. Chemonics Industries (Canada) Ltd. 100%
(Arizona) (Canada)
</TABLE>
All subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements.
85
