ERLY INDUSTRIES INC
DEFA14A, 1997-10-14
GRAIN MILL PRODUCTS
Previous: ERLY INDUSTRIES INC, DEFA14A, 1997-10-14
Next: EASTCO INDUSTRIAL SAFETY CORP, 10KSB, 1997-10-14



<PAGE>   1

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                              (AMENDMENT NO.   )

Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
     Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ]  Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]  Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-11(c) or 240.14a-12

                              ERLY Industries Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

                              ERLY Industries Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.

[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------

     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
          pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
          filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------

     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     (5)  Total fee paid:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------

[ ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
     Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
     paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
     number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1)  Amount Previously Paid:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     (3)  Filing Party:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     (4)  Date Filed:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   2
                          [ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. LOGO]



 
                                October 10, 1997
 
                      PLEASE RETURN YOUR WHITE PROXY CARD
 
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
 
     As you know, we are quickly approaching our annual meeting of shareholders
to be held on Friday, October 17, 1997, at which time you will be asked to vote
on three key proposals that may have a critical impact on the future of your
Company:
 
     1.  Elimination of cumulative voting in elections of directors;
 
     2.  Elimination of shareholder action by written consent; and
 
     3.  Election of five directors.
 
     While I am sure you have received numerous correspondence with respect to
these proposals, there is a recent development which I feel may be of particular
importance to you in making your decision on how to vote.
 
   
     I am pleased to report that Institutional Shareholder Services--the highly
respected independent advisor to institutional investors -- has published a
16-page written report recommending a vote FOR election of the current members
of the board of directors of ERLY and AGAINST election of Nanette Kelley or any
of the other nominees of the Powell Group. Following meetings with members of
your Management and with Ms. Kelley, ISS concluded that the dissidents are not a
superior alternative to current Management. In its report, ISS said: "DUE TO OUR
CONCERNS ABOUT THE POWELL GROUP'S ABILITY TO REFINANCE THE [AMERICAN RICE, INC.]
NOTES AND IN LIGHT OF [ERLY'S] SHAREHOLDER RETURNS OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS, WE
RECOMMEND THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE INCUMBENT DIRECTORS." Enclosed is a
copy of our press release regarding the ISS report.
    
 
     PLEASE DATE, SIGN, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD EVEN IF YOU
HAVE PREVIOUSLY SIGNED A BLUE PROXY CARD OR A WHITE PROXY CARD. ONLY YOUR LATEST
DATED PROXY CARD WILL COUNT. PLEASE ACT PROMPTLY SO THAT YOUR VOTE WILL BE
PROPERLY COUNTED.
 
              ELIMINATION OF CUMULATIVE VOTING IS STILL NECESSARY
 
     Elimination of cumulative voting is still necessary to keep Nanette Kelley
from becoming a member of your Board. With cumulative voting, she can elect
herself to the Board with proxies on a small percentage of the outstanding
shares. And even if it turns out that she is only one of five directors, we
remain very concerned that she will disrupt the business of the Board and
Management.
 
     IN LIGHT OF THE HARM SHE HAS ALREADY CAUSED THE COMPANY, PLEASE CONSIDER
HOW MUCH MORE DAMAGE SHE CAN DO FROM A POSITION AS A DIRECTOR. PLEASE ALSO
IMAGINE HOW DIFFICULT IT WILL BE TO CONDUCT BOARD MEETINGS WITH A DIRECTOR WHO
IS SO HOSTILE TO THE OTHER DIRECTORS THAT SHE HAS SUED THEM. WE FEAR THAT SHE
WILL DELIBERATELY TRY TO SABOTAGE MANAGEMENT TO PROVE THAT HER UNFAIR CLAIMS
ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE YOUR COMPANY WERE TRUE. WE DON'T THINK THAT IS A
RISK YOU SHOULD TAKE. PLEASE VOTE FOR ELIMINATION OF CUMULATIVE VOTING AND AVOID
THAT RISK.
<PAGE>   3
 
                    FUTURE REASSESSMENT OF CUMULATIVE VOTING
 
     After considering comments from some of the Company's larger shareholders,
including ISS, we have decided to submit for shareholder consideration
reinstatement of cumulative voting in elections of directors no later than the
annual meeting of shareholders in the year 2000 if the proposal for elimination
of cumulative voting is approved at the 1997 annual meeting.
 
     Our argument is not with cumulative voting. It is with Nanette Kelley. The
Company's proposal to eliminate cumulative voting was a direct and singular
response to Ms. Kelley's hostile behavior. Her attempts to malign the Board and
Management have been disruptive and, we believe, totally irresponsible.
 
                         CAN NANETTE KELLEY BE TRUSTED?
 
     Here are just a few examples of conduct which demonstrate why we think Ms.
Kelley should not be a director of ERLY:
 
     - She misrepresented that she controlled the vote of 51% of the outstanding
       shares of ERLY when, in actuality, she controlled only a very small
       percentage. If her claim was true, she wouldn't have to keep attacking
       your Management in an effort to get your proxy.
 
     - She misrepresented that she can refinance $99 million of notes of
       American Rice, Inc., the principal subsidiary of ERLY, at a much lower
       interest rate, but has finally admitted that refinancing is not feasible
       since the notes are not callable.
 
   
     - She even claimed that she had a commitment from a bank to loan the money
       needed to refinance ARI's notes when, in actuality, she cannot provide a
       single document to substantiate her claim. There is no such bank
       commitment.
    
 
     - She sued all of the Directors of ERLY and ARI while claiming she knows
       nothing about the facts alleged in the suit and yet she criticizes
       Management for incurring litigation expenses.
 
     - She made no effort to discuss these issues with Management before filing
       her lawsuit and had, in fact, already prepared the lawsuit before she
       ever met one single member of Management.
 
     - She claims that her rice milling company is more profitable than ERLY but
       she refuses to disclose its "reviewed but unaudited" financial
       statements.
 
             YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT -- PLEASE GIVE US YOUR SUPPORT
 
     Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote is important on these
critical issues. We hope you will continue to give us your ongoing support by
signing, dating, and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card FOR each of our
proposals in the enclosed return envelope.
 
     Remember, only your latest dated proxy card counts, so we would like you to
return the enclosed proxy card even if you have previously signed a WHITE or a
BLUE proxy card. Act promptly so that your vote will be properly counted at the
meeting.
 
     We sincerely appreciate and need your help. Gerald Murphy, Douglas Murphy,
William Burgess, Alan Wiener and Bill McFarland are the directors of ERLY. The
officers and directors of ERLY own 37% of the outstanding shares. If you have
any questions or comments, please feel free to call MacKenzie Partners, Inc.,
which is assisting us with our solicitation, at (800) 322-2885.
 
                                          Sincerely,
 
                                  [/s/ GERALD D. MURPHY]
                                          Gerald D. Murphy
                                          Chairman


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission