ERLY INDUSTRIES INC
DFAN14A, 1997-09-29
GRAIN MILL PRODUCTS
Previous: TRIARC COMPANIES INC, 10-Q/A, 1997-09-29
Next: ECC INTERNATIONAL CORP, NT 10-K, 1997-09-29



<PAGE>
 
================================================================================
 
                           SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

          Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
                    Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )
        
Filed by the Registrant [_]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X] 

Check the appropriate box:

[_]  Preliminary Proxy Statement        [_]  Confidential, for Use of the 
                                             Commission Only (as permitted by
                                             Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[_]  Definitive Proxy Statement 

[_]  Definitive Additional Materials 

[X]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12

                             ERLY INDUSTRIES INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

                               THE POWELL GROUP
                      FARMERS RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC.
                               NANETTE N. KELLEY
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

   
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.

[_]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

   
     (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
         pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
         the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      

     (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (5) Total fee paid:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

[_]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
     
[_]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
     Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
     was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
     number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     
     (1) Amount Previously Paid:
 
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (3) Filing Party:
      
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     (4) Date Filed:

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:
<PAGE>
 
                                                           FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[LETTERHEAD OF THE POWELL GROUP]
                                                                COMPANY CONTACT:
                                                                  Nanette Kelley
                                                                       President
                                                                  (504) 922-4540


                                 THE POWELL GROUP FILES FIRST AMENDED DERIVATIVE
                                     COMPLAINT AGAINST ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                                OR ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. (NASDAQ)

                   BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA, SEPTEMBER 29, 1997... The Powell 
Group, its wholly owned subsidiary Farmers Rice Milling Company and The Powell 
Group President Nanette N. Kelley, who together own approximately 3.6% of the 
common shares of ERLY INDUSTRIES INC. (NASDAQ:ERLY), Los Angeles, announced 
today that they have filed in United States District Court, Central District of 
California, a First Amended Derivative Complaint against ERLY, AMERICAN RICE,
INC. (NASDAQ:RICE) (ARI) and ERLY's entire board of directors.

     On September 10, 1997, a jury returned verdicts for damages and costs 
against Gerald Murphy, chairman and chief executive officer of ERLY, and Douglas
Murphy, chief operating officer and a director of ERLY, for nearly $18 million 
in connection with litigation arising from the defendants' personal investment 
in a speculative Texas real estate development project. The Murphys had caused 
ERLY and ARI to become involved in disputes between the Murphys and their 
former partners, and as a result of that involvement, the jury also found ERLY 
and ARI jointly and severally liable for a portion of the damages and costs 
suffered by the plaintiffs. Ultimately, the verdict could result in an award for
damages and costs against ERLY and ARI of as much as $10 million. As a result, 
The Powell Group amended its recently filed lawsuit against Gerald Murphy, 
alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate 
assets, and the making of illegal corporate loans, to include all of ERLY's 
directors.

     "We believe that each ERLY director is accountable for the betrayal of the 
company's shareholders for approving corporate funds to defend the Murphys for 
civil fraud and conspiracy in the failure of a planned adult housing 
development. We believe that the present composition of the ERLY board is 
designed to make each director dependent on Gerald and Douglas Murphy. The 
Murphys, with the approval of the other board members, have subjected ERLY to 
substantial unnecessary damages, legal expenses and costs as a result of their 
intentional breach of fiduciary duties," Kelley said

     "We believe that the entire ERLY board was fully aware that the Murphy 
legal defense was outrageously unfair to ERLY and its shareholders and was being
undertaken to benefit the Murphys personally at company expense. They knew that 
it was a waste of corporate assets and would damage ERLY, but went ahead and 
approved and acquiesced in this misconduct. They voted unanimously to continue 
to advance funds for the Murphy legal defense in the Texas trial and to require
Gerald Murphy to repay no more than half of the total legal bills," she added.

     On August 25, 1997, Kelley and The Powell Group filed a Proxy Solicitation 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission seeking to elect a new board of 
directors of ERLY.

     A privately held holding company based in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, the 
Powell Group has interests in rice farming, rice milling and storage, rice 
hull-to-electricity generation, radio broadcasting, commercial and residential 
real estate development and construction, travel management services and timber.

                                *  *  *  *  *  
                                                                           #1490


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission