BP AMOCO PLC
6-K, 2000-02-04
PETROLEUM REFINING
Previous: MEDITRUST OPERATING CO, S-3, 2000-02-04
Next: HANCOCK JOHN CASH RESERVE INC, 497, 2000-02-04




                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

                            Report of Foreign Issuer

                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                             dated February 4, 2000

                                 BP AMOCO p.l.c.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


          BRITANNIC HOUSE, 1 FINSBURY CIRCUS, LONDON, EC2M 7BA, ENGLAND
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant  files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                 Form 20-F         x            Form 40-F
                          ---------------------          ---------------------


        Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  by  furnishing  the
        information  contained  in  this  Form is also  thereby  furnishing  the
        information  to the  Commission  pursuant  to Rule  12g3-2(b)  under the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                   Yes                             No          x
                       ---------------------          ---------------------




THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE  INCORPORATED  BY REFERENCE IN THE
PROXY  STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS  INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRATION  STATEMENT ON FORM F-4
(FILE  NO.  333-10588)  OF BP  AMOCO  p.l.c.,  THE  PROSPECTUS  INCLUDED  IN THE
REGISTRATION  STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (FILE NO. 333-9790) OF BP AMOCO p.l.c.,  THE
PROSPECTUS  INCLUDED  IN THE  REGISTRATION  STATEMENT  ON  FORM  F-3  (FILE  NO.
33-39075) OF BP AMERICA INC. AND BP AMOCO p.l.c., THE PROSPECTUS INCLUDED IN THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (FILE NO. 33-20338) OF BP AMERICA INC. AND BP
AMOCO p.l.c., THE PROSPECTUS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRATION  STATEMENT ON FORM F-3
(FILE NO.  33-29102)  OF THE  STANDARD  OIL  COMPANY  AND BP AMOCO  p.l.c.,  THE
PROSPECTUS  INCLUDED  IN THE  REGISTRATION  STATEMENT  ON  FORM  S-8  (FILE  NO.
33-21868)  OF BP AMOCO  p.l.c.,  THE  PROSPECTUS  INCLUDED  IN THE  REGISTRATION
STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO.  333-9020) OF BP AMOCO  p.l.c.,  THE  PROSPECTUS
INCLUDED IN THE  REGISTRATION  STATEMENT  ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO.  333-9798) OF BP
AMOCO p.l.c., AND THE PROSPECTUS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRATION  STATEMENT ON FORM
S-8 (FILE NO.  333-79399) OF BP AMOCO p.l.c.,  AND TO BE A PART THEREOF FROM THE
DATE ON WHICH  THIS  REPORT  IS  FURNISHED,  TO THE  EXTENT  NOT  SUPERSEDED  BY
DOCUMENTS OR REPORTS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED OR FURNISHED.


<PAGE>

The following  document  (bearing the exhibit  number listed below) is furnished
herewith and made part of this Report pursuant to the General  Instructions  for
Form 6-K.

Exhibit

1.   Press Release dated  February 2, 2000,  entitled 'BP Amoco and Arco Prepare
     for Litigation'.




                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                 BP AMOCO p.l.c.
                                  (Registrant)

Dated:   February 4, 2000                     By: /s/ P.J. CLAYTON
                                                  Deputy Company Secretary




BP AMOCO AND ARCO PREPARE FOR LITIGATION

Following  the decision of the US Federal Trade  Commission  (FTC) to oppose the
proposed  combination of BP Amoco and ARCO, the two companies  today  reaffirmed
their intention to pursue the issue in court.

The companies said in a joint statement: "We are surprised and disappointed that
the FTC has rejected all efforts for a positive resolution. We have consistently
been  open to  improvement  of our  original  proposal.  We have  addressed  the
concerns of the State of Alaska.  We have been,  and remain,  willing to discuss
any reasonable options that might lead to a negotiated settlement.

"We regret that the only  course now open to us is to resolve the issue  through
litigation  but  we  believe  we  have  a  compelling  case  in  support  of our
combination which we will argue vigorously in court."

The statement  added:  "Any suggestion that there is a special West Coast market
for Alaskan  crude oil that  functions  independently  of world crude  prices is
without  foundation.  In fact,  the proposed  combination  of our companies will
drive down Alaskan  production costs,  making Alaskan crude oil more competitive
in the world market.

"This fact was recognised in the charter agreement reached between the companies
and the State of Alaska last December. West Coast consumers will benefit because
BP Amoco has  undertaken to continue  ARCO's  low-price,  high-volume  marketing
strategy.  Since  there is no  refining  or  marketing  overlap  between the two
companies  there should be no adverse  competition  issues  concerning  gasoline
prices.

"Unfortunately,  litigation  will add needless time and cost to the  combination
process," the companies  said.  "The losers from this delay and  uncertainty are
the  people  and  communities  who are  relying  on the  combination  for future
projects, jobs and commitments."

The proposed combination of BP Amoco and ARCO was announced on April 1, 1999 and
was  subsequently  approved  by the  European  Union  and  shareholders  of both
companies. An agreement was also reached with the State of Alaska committing the
combined  company  to reduce  its  ownership  of Alaska  North  Slope  crude oil
production  as well as  exploration  acreage and  interests in the  Trans-Alaska
Pipeline system and marine tankers.

In  addition,  BP Amoco  assured  California  Governor  Gray Davis that it would
maintain ARCO's low-price gasoline marketing strategy, remove MTBE from gasoline
a year ahead of the state's  December 2002 deadline and  substantially  increase
ARCO's  contribution  to $100 million over ten years to charitable and community
causes in the state.



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission