FORM 10-QSB - QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Quarterly or Transitional Report
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2000
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ......... to ........
Commission file number 0-10255
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
South Carolina 57-0707398
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
55 Beattie Place, Post Office Box 1089
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)
(864) 239-1000
(Issuer's telephone number)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
a)
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per unit data)
March 31, 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Assets
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,501
Receivables and deposits 134
Restricted escrows 637
Other assets 260
Investment properties:
Land $ 1,428
Buildings and related personal property 20,129
21,557
Less accumulated depreciation (15,103) 6,454
$ 8,986
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 177
Tenant security deposit liabilities 147
Accrued property taxes 62
Other liabilities 292
Mortgage notes payable 11,227
Partners' Deficit
General partners $ (54)
Limited partners (15,000 units issued and
outstanding) (2,865) (2,919)
$ 8,986
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
b)
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit data)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2000 1999
Revenues:
Rental income $1,312 $1,285
Other income 77 58
Total revenues 1,389 1,343
Expenses:
Operating 524 503
General and administrative 49 55
Depreciation 184 157
Interest 233 237
Property taxes 77 69
Total expenses 1,067 1,021
Net income $ 322 $ 322
Net income allocated to general partners (1%) $ 3 $ 3
Net income allocated to limited partners (99%) 319 319
$ 322 $ 322
Net income per limited partnership unit $21.27 $21.27
Distributions per limited partnership unit $33.00 $66.00
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
c)
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Limited
Partnership General Limited
Units Partners Partners Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Original capital contributions 15,000 $ 2 $15,000 $15,002
Partners' deficit at
December 31, 1999 15,000 $ (52) $(2,689) $(2,741)
Distributions to partners -- (5) (495) (500)
Net income for the three months
ended March 31, 2000 -- 3 319 322
Partners' deficit at
March 31, 2000 15,000 $ (54) $(2,865) $(2,919)
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
d)
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2000 1999
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S> <C> <C>
Net income $ 322 $ 322
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 184 157
Amortization of discounts and loan costs 22 23
Change in accounts:
Receivables and deposits 7 --
Other assets (24) (41)
Accounts payable 35 (45)
Tenant security deposit liabilities -- 7
Accrued property taxes 14 (4)
Other liabilities (29) 31
Net cash provided by operating activities 531 450
Cash flows from investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements (260) (87)
Net (deposits to) withdrawals from restricted escrows (136) 136
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities (396) 49
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on mortgage notes payable (39) (36)
Distributions to partners (500) (1,000)
Net cash used in financing activities (539) (1,036)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (404) (537)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,905 1,682
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 1,501 $ 1,145
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest $ 211 $ 214
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
</TABLE>
e)
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A - Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Shelter
Properties I (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Article 310(b) of
Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of Shelter Realty I Corporation (the
"Corporate General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2000, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2000. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Principles of Consolidation
The Registrant's financial statements include all of the accounts of the
Registrant and its 99.99% owned partnership. The General Partner of the
consolidated partnership is Shelter Realty I Corporation. Shelter Realty I
Corporation may be removed by the Registrant; therefore, the consolidated
partnership is controlled and consolidated by the Registrant. All significant
interpartnership transactions have been eliminated.
Note B - Transfer of Control
Pursuant to a series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and
February 26, 1999, Insignia Financial Group, Inc. and Insignia Properties Trust
merged into Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly
traded real estate investment trust with AIMCO being the surviving corporation
(the "Insignia Merger"). As a result, AIMCO ultimately acquired 100% ownership
interest in the Corporate General Partner. The Corporate General Partner does
not believe that this transaction has had or will have a material effect on the
affairs and operations of the Partnership.
Note C - Reconciliation of Cash Flows
The following is a reconciliation of the subtotal on the accompanying
consolidated statements of cash flows captioned "net cash provided by operating
activities" to "net cash provided by operations", as defined in the Partnership
Agreement. However, "net cash provided by operations" should not be considered
an alternative to net income as an indicator of the Partnership's operating
performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in thousands)
2000 1999
<S> <C> <C>
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 531 $ 450
Payments on mortgage notes payable (39) (36)
Property improvements and replacements (260) (87)
Change in restricted escrows, net (136) 136
Changes in reserves for net operating
liabilities (3) 52
Additional reserves (93) (515)
Net cash provided by operations $ -- $ --
</TABLE>
At March 31, 2000 and 1999, the Corporate General Partner reserved an additional
$93,000 and $515,000, respectively to fund continuing capital improvements and
repairs at the Partnership's four investment properties.
Note D - Transactions with Affiliated Parties
The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the Corporate General
Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all
partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for (i) certain
payments to affiliates for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership. The following payments were
paid or accrued to the Corporate General Partner and affiliates during the three
months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999:
2000 1999
(in thousands)
Property management fees (included in
operating expenses) $ 71 $ 67
Reimbursement for services of affiliates
(included in operating and general and
administrative expense and investment properties) 26 32
Due to Corporate General Partner 101 101
During the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, affiliates of the
Corporate General Partner were entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of the Registrant's properties for providing property management services. The
Registrant paid to such affiliates approximately $71,000 and $67,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
An affiliate of the Corporate General Partner received reimbursement of
accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $26,000 and
$32,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
During 1992, a liability of approximately $101,000 was incurred to the Corporate
General Partner for sales commissions earned. Per the Partnership Agreement,
this liability can not be paid until certain levels of return are received by
the limited partners. As of March 31, 2000, the level of return to the limited
partners has not been met.
AIMCO and its affiliates currently own 10,278 limited partnership units in the
Partnership representing 68.52% of the outstanding units. A number of these
units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates.
It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will make one or more additional
offers to acquire additional limited partnership interests in the Partnership
for cash or in exchange for units in the operating partnership of AIMCO. Under
the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters. As a result of its
ownership of 68.52% of the outstanding units, AIMCO is in a position to
influence all voting decisions with respect to the Registrant. When voting on
matters, AIMCO would in all likelihood vote the Units it acquired in a manner
favorable to the interest of the Corporate General Partner because of their
affiliation with the Corporate General Partner.
Note E - Distributions
Cash distributions from operations of approximately $500,000 ($495,000 of which
was paid to the limited partners, $33.00 per limited partnership unit) and
$1,000,000 ($990,000 of which was paid to the limited partners, $66.00 per
limited partnership unit) were made to the partners during the three months
ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Note F - Segment Reporting
Description of the types of products and services from which the reportable
segment derives its revenues:
The Partnership has one reportable segment: residential properties. The
Partnership's residential property segment consists of four apartment complexes
located in Georgia (2), Virginia, and South Carolina. The Partnership rents
apartment units to tenants for terms that are typically twelve months or less.
Measurement of segment profit or loss:
The Partnership evaluates performance based on segment profit (loss) before
depreciation. The accounting policies of the reportable segment are the same as
those of the Partnership as described in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Factors management used to identify the enterprise's reportable segment:
The Partnership's reportable segment consists of investment properties that
offer similar products and services. Although each of the investment properties
is managed separately, they have been aggregated into one segment as they
provide services with similar types of products and customers.
Segment information for the three month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 is
shown in the tables below. The "Other" column includes partnership
administration related items and income and expense not allocated to the
reportable segment.
2000 Residential Other Totals
(in thousands)
Rental income $ 1,312 $ -- $ 1,312
Other income 75 2 77
Interest expense 233 -- 233
Depreciation 184 -- 184
General and administrative expense -- 49 49
Segment profit (loss) 369 (47) 322
Total assets 8,802 184 8,986
Capital expenditures for investment
properties 260 -- 260
1999 Residential Other Totals
(in thousands)
Rental income $ 1,285 $ -- $ 1,285
Other income 51 7 58
Interest expense 237 -- 237
Depreciation 157 -- 157
General and administrative expense -- 55 55
Segment profit (loss) 370 (48) 322
Total assets 7,948 575 8,523
Capital expenditures for investment
properties 87 -- 87
Note G - Legal Proceedings
In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others,
the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships and corporate entities. The action purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are named as nominal
defendants, challenging the acquisition by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia
("Insignia Affiliates") of interests in certain general partner entities, past
tender offers by Insignia Affiliates to acquire limited partnership units, the
management of partnerships by Insignia Affiliates and the Insignia Merger (see
"Note B - Transfer of Control"). The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and
equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. On June 25,
1998, the Corporate General Partner filed a motion seeking dismissal of the
action. In lieu of responding to the motion, the plaintiffs have filed an
amended complaint. The Corporate General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999. Pending the ruling on such demurrers,
settlement negotiations commenced. On November 2, 1999, the parties executed and
filed a Stipulation of Settlement, settling claims, subject to final court
approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all limited partners who own units as
of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of the settlement was obtained on
November 3, 1999 from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
San Mateo, at which time the Court set a final approval hearing for December 10,
1999. Prior to the December 10, 1999 hearing the Court received various
objections to the settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary
approval based upon the alleged lack of authority of class plaintiffs' counsel
to enter the settlement. On December 14, 1999, the Corporate General Partner and
its affiliates terminated the proposed settlement. Certain plaintiffs have filed
a motion to disqualify some of the plaintiffs' counsel in the action. The
Corporate General Partner does not anticipate that costs associated with this
case will be material to the Partnership's overall operations.
The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
The matters discussed in this Form 10-QSB contain certain forward-looking
statements and involve risks and uncertainties (including changing market
conditions, competitive and regulatory matters, etc.) detailed in the
disclosures contained in this Form 10-QSB and the other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission made by the Registrant from time to time. The
discussion of the Registrant's business and results of operations, including
forward-looking statements pertaining to such matters, does not take into
account the effects of any changes to the Registrant's business and results of
operations. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.
The Partnership's investment properties consist of four apartment complexes. The
following table sets forth the average occupancy of the properties for each of
the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999:
Average
Occupancy
Property 2000 1999
Quail Hollow Apartments
West Columbia, South Carolina 90% 92%
Windsor Hills Apartments
Blacksburg, Virginia 96% 97%
Heritage Pointe Apartments
(Formerly Rome Georgian Apartments)
Rome, Georgia 92% 96%
Stone Mountain West Apartments
Stone Mountain, Georgia 96% 95%
The Corporate General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at Heritage
Pointe Apartments to increased competition in the local market.
Results of Operations
The Registrant's net income for both the three months ended March 31, 2000 and
1999, was approximately $322,000. There was no change in net income for the
comparable three month periods, however total revenues and total expense both
increased for the three months ended March 31, 2000 as compared to 1999. The
increase in total expenses is primarily attributable to an increase in
depreciation, operating, and property tax expenses. Depreciation expense
increased at all the Partnership's properties due to the increase in depreciable
assets placed into service over the past year at all four of the Partnership's
investment properties. Operating expense increased due to an increase in
insurance expense and employee salaries and related employee benefits. The
increase in total expenses was partially offset by a decrease in general and
administrative expense.
The increase in total revenues is due to an increase in rental income and other
income. Rental income increased as a result of an increase in the average annual
rental rates at all four of the Registrant's investment properties which more
than offset the decrease in occupancy noted above. Other income increased due to
an increase in lease cancellation fees and deposit forfeitures as a result of
the decrease in occupancy at three of the Registrant's investment properties.
General and administrative expense decreased due to a decrease in general
partner reimbursements allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included in
general and administrative expense were costs associated with the quarterly and
annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement.
As part of the ongoing business plan of the Registrant, the Corporate General
Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment properties to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting the Registrant from increases in expenses. As part of this
plan, the Corporate General Partner attempts to protect the Registrant from the
burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and
maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, due to changing market
conditions, which can result in the use of rental concessions and rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Corporate General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2000, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $1,501,000 compared to approximately $1,145,000 at March 31, 1999.
The decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31,
2000 from the Partnership's year ended December 31, 1999, was approximately
$404,000. This decrease is due to approximately $539,000 of cash used in
financing activities and approximately $396,000 of cash used in investing
activities partially offset by approximately $531,000 of cash provided by
operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of
distributions to partners and to a lesser extent, principal payments made on
mortgages encumbering the Registrant's investment properties. Cash used in
investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements and net
deposits to restricted escrows maintained by the mortgage lenders. The
Registrant invests its working capital reserves in money market accounts.
The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital
expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital
expenditures required at the properties to adequately maintain the physical
assets and other operating needs of the Registrant and to comply with Federal,
state, local, legal, and regulatory requirements. Capital improvements planned
for each of the Registrant's properties are detailed below.
Quail Hollow Apartments
The Partnership has budgeted approximately $264,000 for capital improvements at
Quail Hollow Apartments consisting primarily of exterior painting, floor
covering and appliance replacements, and exterior building improvements. During
the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Partnership spent approximately
$172,000 consisting primarily of appliances, roof replacements, exterior
painting, and exterior building improvements. These improvements were funded
from operating cash flow and replacement reserves.
Heritage Pointe Apartments
The Partnership has budgeted approximately $93,000 for capital improvements at
Heritage Pointe Apartments consisting primarily of plumbing upgrades, floor
covering and appliance replacements and air conditioning upgrades. During the
three months ended March 31, 2000, the Partnership spent approximately $36,000
consisting primarily of plumbing upgrades, appliances, and floor covering
replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
Stone Mountain West Apartments
The Partnership has budgeted approximately $99,000 for capital improvements at
Stone Mountain West Apartments consisting primarily of floor covering, appliance
replacements, parking area upgrades and air conditioning unit replacements.
During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Partnership spent
approximately $49,000 consisting primarily of major landscaping, floor covering
replacements and appliances. These improvements were funded from operating cash
flow.
Windsor Hills Apartments
The Partnership has budgeted approximately $155,000 for capital improvements at
Windsor Hills Apartments consisting primarily of structural improvements, floor
covering and appliance replacements, and air conditioning unit replacements.
During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Partnership spent
approximately $3,000 consisting primarily of floor covering replacements. These
improvements were funded from operating cash flow.
The additional capital improvements will be incurred only if cash is available
from operations and Partnership reserves. To the extent that such budgeted
capital improvements are completed, the Registrant's distributable cash flow, if
any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.
The Registrant's current assets are thought to be sufficient for any near term
needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Registrant. The mortgage
indebtedness of approximately $11,227,000, net of discount, is amortized over
varying periods with required balloon payments ranging from November 15, 2002 to
November 1, 2003. The Corporate General Partner will attempt to refinance such
indebtedness and/or sell the properties prior to such maturity date. If the
properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Registrant
will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.
Cash distributions from operations of approximately $500,000 ($495,000 of which
was paid to the limited partners, $33.00 per limited partnership unit) and
$1,000,000 ($990,000 of which was paid to the limited partners, $66.00 per
limited partnership unit) were made to the partners during the three months
ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Registrant's distribution
policy is reviewed on a semi-annual basis. Future cash distributions will depend
on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the availability of cash
reserves, and the timing of debt maturities, refinancings, and/or property
sales. There can be no assurance; however, that the Registrant will generate
sufficient funds from operations to permit further distributions to its partners
in 2000 or subsequent periods. Distributions may be further restricted by the
requirement to deposit net operating income (as described in the mortgage notes)
into a Reserve Account until the Reserve Account is funded in an amount equal to
$300 to $325 per apartment unit for Quail Hollow, Stone Mountain West and
Heritage Pointe for a total of $151,800 to $164,500. The mortgage agreement
stipulates a minimum reserve of $400 per apartment unit at Windsor Hills for a
total of $120,000. As of March 31, 2000 the Partnership had deposits of
approximately $441,000 in its Reserve Accounts.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California
for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others,
the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner and several of their affiliated
partnerships and corporate entities. The action purports to assert claims on
behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of
limited partnerships (including the Partnership) which are named as nominal
defendants, challenging the acquisition by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.
("Insignia") and entities which were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia
("Insignia Affiliates") of interests in certain general partner entities, past
tender offers by Insignia Affiliates to acquire limited partnership units, the
management of partnerships by Insignia Affiliates and the Insignia Merger (see
"Part 1 - Financial Information, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note B - Transfer
of Control"). The plaintiffs seek monetary damages and equitable relief,
including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. On June 25, 1998, the
Corporate General Partner filed a motion seeking dismissal of the action. In
lieu of responding to the motion, the plaintiffs have filed an amended
complaint. The Corporate General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999. Pending the ruling on such demurrers,
settlement negotiations commenced. On November 2, 1999, the parties executed and
filed a Stipulation of Settlement, settling claims, subject to final court
approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all limited partners who own units as
of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of the settlement was obtained on
November 3, 1999 from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
San Mateo, at which time the Court set a final approval hearing for December 10,
1999. Prior to the December 10, 1999 hearing the Court received various
objections to the settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary
approval based upon the alleged lack of authority of class plaintiffs' counsel
to enter the settlement. On December 14, 1999, the Corporate General Partner and
its affiliates terminated the proposed settlement. Certain plaintiffs have filed
a motion to disqualify some of the plaintiffs' counsel in the action. The
Corporate General Partner does not anticipate that costs associated with this
case will be material to the Partnership's overall operations.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a) Exhibits:
Exhibit 27, Financial Data Schedule, is filed as an exhibit to
this report.
b) Reports on Form 8-K filed during the quarter ended March 31,
2000:
None.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SHELTER PROPERTIES I
By: Shelter Realty I Corporation
Corporate General Partner
By: /s/Patrick J. Foye
Patrick J. Foye
Executive Vice President and Director
By: /s/Martha L. Long
Martha L. Long
Senior Vice President and
Controller
Date: May 10, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties I 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316220
<NAME> Shelter Properties I
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END> MAR-31-2000
<CASH> 1,501
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 134
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 0 <F1>
<PP&E> 21,557
<DEPRECIATION> 15,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 8,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 0 <F1>
<BONDS> 11,227
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> (2,919)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 0
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,389
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 1,067
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 233
<INCOME-PRETAX> 0
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 322
<EPS-BASIC> 21.27 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
</TABLE>
