United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE #0-9623
UST CORP.
---------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS 04-2436093
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
40 COURT STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(617) 726-7000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.625
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by Reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The number of shares of common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as
of February 20, 1997 was 25,237,309 for an aggregate market value of
$525,251,494.
At February 20, 1997, there were issued and outstanding 28,288,446 shares of
common stock, par value $0.625 per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's proxy statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting are
incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Part III.
Form 10-K Table of Contents
---------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Part I
<S> <C>
Item 1 Business 1
Item 2 Properties 9
Item 3 Legal Proceedings 10
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 10
Part II
Item 5 Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Security Holder Matters 10
Item 6 Selected Financial Data 11
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11
Financial Condition at December 31, 1996 12
Results of Operations 22
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Material 30
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 56
Part III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 56
Item 11 Executive Compensation 59
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 59
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 59
Part IV
Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 59
Signatures 63
</TABLE>
ii
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
General Description of Business
UST Corp. (the "Company"), a bank holding company registered with the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve Board"), was
organized as a Massachusetts business corporation in 1967. The Company is also
subject to examination by, and is required to file reports with, the
Commissioner of Banks of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the "Massachusetts
Commissioner"). As of December 31, 1996, the Company's banking subsidiaries were
USTrust and United States Trust Company ("USTC"), each headquartered in Boston.
Subsequently, on January 3, 1997, the Company acquired Walden Bancorp, Inc. of
Acton, Massachusetts ("Walden"), and its subsidiary banks, The Co-operative Bank
of Concord ("Concord"), headquartered in Concord, and The Braintree Savings Bank
("Braintree") headquartered in Braintree. The Company's acquisition of Walden is
discussed in further detail under the caption "Recent Developments - Acquisition
of Walden Bancorp, Inc." below. Each of the Company's subsidiary banks are
chartered under Massachusetts law. USTrust, USTC, Braintree and Concord are
sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Subsidiary Banks". All of
the capital stock of the Subsidiary Banks is owned directly or indirectly by the
Company. In addition, the Company owns, indirectly through its banking
subsidiaries, all of the outstanding stock of three active nonbanking
subsidiaries, all Massachusetts corporations: UST Leasing Corporation, UST
Capital Corp. and JSA Financial Corporation. As a result of the Walden
acquisition, the Company also acquired Concord's three nonbanking subsidiaries,
Walden Financial Corp., Walden Securities Corp. and Builders Collaborative, Inc.
and Braintree's three nonbanking subsidiaries, Braintree Savings Corp.,
Braintree Securities Corp. and Bra-Prop Corp. The Company engages in one line of
business, that of providing financial services through its banking and
nonbanking subsidiaries. A broad range of financial services is provided
principally to individuals and small- and medium-sized companies in New England
including those located in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods within the
Company's defined Community Reinvestment Act assessment area. In addition, an
important component of the Company's financial services is the provision of
trust and money management services to professionals, corporate executives,
nonprofit organizations, labor unions, foundations, mutual funds and owners of
closely-held businesses most of whom are located in the New England region. As
of the close of business on December 31, 1996, the Company's total assets were
approximately $2.71 billion and USTrust, the lead bank, had over $2.69 billion,
or 99 percent of the Company's consolidated assets. As of the close of business
on December 31, 1996, Walden's consolidated assets were approximately $1.0
billion.
The Subsidiary Banks
The Subsidiary Banks are engaged in a general banking business and accept
deposits which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
("FDIC"). In addition, Braintree's deposits in excess of FDIC insurance limits
are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the Mutual Savings Central Fund,
Inc. of Massachusetts and Concord's deposits in excess of FDIC insurance limits
are insured by the Share Insurance Fund of the Co-operative Central Bank. USTC,
which has full banking powers and accepts deposits which are insured by the
FDIC, focuses its activity on trust and money management, venture capital and
other fee-generating businesses. USTrust and USTC are commercial banks,
Braintree is a savings bank and Concord is a co-operative bank. The Subsidiary
Banks are all located in Massachusetts.
Recent Developments
Acquisition of Twenty (20) Bank of Boston and BayBank Branches On June 18, 1996,
USTrust entered into an agreement with The First National Bank of Boston to
purchase certain assets, deposit liabilities and other liabilities assigned to
twenty (20) branches in the greater Boston, Massachusetts area. Four (4) were
former branches of The First National Bank of Boston and sixteen (16) were
former branches of BayBank, N.A., an affiliate of The First National Bank of
Boston. In December, 1996, the transaction was completed.
1
USTrust assumed approximately $744 million in deposit liabilities and repurchase
agreements and purchased approximately $517 million in (i) commercial loans;
(ii) residential mortgages; (iii) home equity and other loans to businesses and
other customers located within or in areas proximate to the communities served
by the branches; (iv) certain fixed assets; (v) real property related to the
owned branches (vi) certain lease obligations with respect to the leased
branches and (vii) cash at the branches. Additionally, USTrust paid a premium
equal to 7% of the aggregate average daily balance of deposit liabilities
assumed for the period commencing twenty business days prior to the third
business day prior to the closing date and ending on the third business day
prior to the closing date. This premium was approximately $49 million. USTrust
did not acquire or retain any management personnel in connection with the
purchase of the branches nor any personnel responsible for originating the
majority of the loans acquired upon consummation of the transaction.
The four (4) former branches of The First National Bank of Boston opened for
business as USTrust branches on November 12, 1996 and the sixteen (16) former
branches of BayBank, N.A. opened for business as USTrust branches on December 9,
1996.
Sale of UST Bank/Connecticut
On August 15, 1996, the Company executed a definitive Agreement and Plan of
Merger under the terms of which the Company sold its Connecticut banking
subsidiary, UST Bank/Connecticut to HUBCO, Inc., a New Jersey based bank holding
company. The transaction was consummated on November 29, 1996 and, at that time,
UST Bank/Connecticut was merged with and into HUBCO's subsidiary, Lafayette
American Bank and Trust Company of Bridgeport, Connecticut. UST Bank/Connecticut
operated four offices in Fairfield County with total assets of approximately
$107 million. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company received cash of
$13.4 million representing UST Bank/Connecticut's adjusted capital plus a
deposit premium of 7%.
Acquisition of Walden Bancorp, Inc.
On August 30, 1996, the Company executed an agreement (the "Affiliation
Agreement") with Walden pursuant to which the Company would acquire Walden. On
January 3, 1997, the Company consummated this acquisition. Walden was the bank
holding company for Concord and Braintree, which operate an aggregate of
seventeen (17) branches in the Massachusetts counties of Middlesex, Norfolk and
Plymouth with assets aggregating $1 billion.
The transaction was structured as a tax-free exchange of 1.9 shares of the
Company's common stock for each share of Walden common stock and accounted for
as a pooling of interests. As of the closing date of January 3, 1997, the
transaction was valued at approximately $207 million. A total of 10,125,540
shares of the Company's common stock were issued in exchange for the 5,329,232
Walden shares outstanding at the closing date.
The assets acquired by the Company from Walden included the physical
premises of (or the leases with respect to) the aggregate of seventeen (17)
branches of Concord and Braintree. The Company also acquired all of the
personalty in these branches. USTrust has applied to the Massachusetts
Commissioner and the FDIC seeking permission to merge both Concord and Braintree
with and into USTrust. The Company anticipates that the transaction will be
consummated during the second quarter of 1997. Until that time, the branch
locations will continue to operate as branches of Concord and Braintree.
In connection with the acquisition of Walden and pursuant to the terms of the
Affiliation Agreement, the Company also named three (3) former Directors of
Walden to the Boards of Directors of the Company and USTrust. The individuals so
elected are David E. Bradbury, G. Robert Tod and Chester G. Atkins. Mr. Bradbury
was formerly the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
of Walden and Chairman of the Board of Concord. Mr. Tod is the President, Chief
Operating Officer and a director of the CML Group, Inc., a specialty retailer in
Acton, Massachusetts. He is also a Director of SCI Systems Inc., of Huntsville,
Alabama, and EG&G, Inc., of Wellesley, Massachusetts. Mr. Atkins is a Partner in
ADS Ventures, Inc., of Concord, Massachusetts. Mr. Atkins is also the former
United States Congressman from the 5th Congressional District of Massachusetts.
Business Services
The Subsidiary Banks provide a broad range of banking services including
deposit, investment, cash management, payroll, wire transfer, leasing, merchant
credit card and lending services throughout New England. Commercial and
industrial lending takes the form primarily of direct loans and includes lines
of credit, revolving credits, domestic and foreign letters of credit, term
loans, mortgage loans, receivable, inventory and equipment loans and other
specialized lending services. Furthermore, the Company provides additional
2
services to small business customers through utilization of government sponsored
and assisted loan programs and through the Company's Minority Enterprise Loan
Program. Since 1994, USTrust has been certified by the SBA as a "Small Business
Administration Lender." USTC provides deposit services and other banking
services, but focuses its activities on money management, venture capital and
other fee-generating services. Through loan participations, each bank is able to
provide credit to businesses in its area up to the aggregate limit available to
the Company's subsidiary banks. At December 31, 1996, the lending limit to a
single borrower of USTrust was approximately $35.8 million, and the lending
limits for the other subsidiary banks, USTC, Braintree and Concord, were
respectively $0.4 million, $9.7 million and $8.4 million.
Consumer Services
Consumer services are provided by the Subsidiary Banks to customers in their
geographic areas. These services include savings and checking accounts, NOW and
money market accounts, consumer loans, credit cards (through a private label
arrangement), ATM and debit cards, safe deposit box facilities and travelers'
checks. Consumer loans include home equity loans and lines of credit, automobile
loans, personal loans and loans to finance education costs as well as open-ended
credit. In 1996, the Company ceased providing residential mortgage origination
services. Through Concord, the Company maintains a residential mortgage
servicing capacity. As of February 28, 1997, the aggregate principal amount of
mortgages serviced by the Company was approximately $1.2 billion, of which $575
million is serviced for other institutions. Automobile loans increased
substantially in 1996 and reached a level of approximately $300 million as of
December 31, 1996. In addition, in 1997 the Company expects to begin offering
automobile leasing services to customers. The Company's Subsidiary Banks
currently have an aggregate of 65 offices which maintain an automated teller
machine system which, through membership in various networks, provides the
Company's customers with access to their accounts at locations throughout the
world. Most of the Company's proprietary ATM machines provide information to
customers in three languages, English, Spanish and Portuguese, and also provide
information adapted for the visually impaired.
Investment Services
The Investment Group located at USTrust was formed in 1994. The Investment
Group, a service of Essex National Securities, Inc. and Essex Insurance Agency
of Massachusetts, Inc., an unaffiliated, licensed broker-dealer, offers mutual
funds (whose investments are managed by nonaffiliated third parties), Treasury
Bills, Treasury Notes, corporate bonds, state, federal and municipal bonds and
discount brokerage services to the customers of USTrust. The Essex Insurance
Agency of Massachusetts, Inc. also offers annuities to USTrust customers at
branch locations.
Real Estate Services
The Subsidiary Banks provide a broad range of industrial and commercial real
estate lending services and other related financial services. In addition, as
noted above under the caption, "Consumer Services," Concord is engaged in
residential mortgage servicing.
Asset and Money Management and Trust Services
Asset and money management, custodial and trust services are provided by USTC.
In addition, USTC provides services as executor, administrator and trustee of
estates and acts, under the terms of agreements, in various capacities such as
escrow agent, bond trustee and trustee and agent of pension, profit sharing and
other employee benefit trusts. At December 31, 1996, the total assets under
management of USTC were approximately $2.8 billion. Approximately one-third of
total assets under management are those of clients who have requested that their
assets be managed with specified social as well as financial investment
objectives in mind. USTC also serves as investment adviser to a balanced mutual
fund, the Boston Managed Growth Fund.
Securities Portfolios Maintained by the Company
The Subsidiary Banks, both directly and through wholly-owned Massachusetts
securities corporations, maintain securities portfolios consisting primarily of
U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government Agency, and corporate and municipal securities,
some of which are secured by assets. The Subsidiary Banks own an aggregate of
four (4) Massachusetts securities corporations, namely UST Securities Corp.
(owned by USTrust),
3
Walden Securities Corporation, Inc. (owned by Concord) and Bra-Prop Corporation
and Braintree Securities Corp. (owned by Braintree). In 1997, the Company
organized a fifth company, USTrust Securities Corp., as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of UST Securities Corp. As Massachusetts securities corporations,
these subsidiaries make exclusively passive investments and serve the Company by
engaging exclusively in the buying, selling, dealing in and holding of
securities.
All of the Company's securities are deemed "available-for-sale" which enhances
the liquidity position of the Company and allows for flexibility in management
of interest rate risk. The securities portfolios of the Subsidiary Banks also
include certain other equity investments as allowed within limits prescribed by
Massachusetts and federal law. Such investments currently include, among others,
equity interests in the Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation's Limited
Partnership Equity Fund for Affordable Housing. The Treasury Division of the
Company provides securities portfolio advisory services to the Company's
affiliated banks. USTrust is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Boston. This membership provides USTrust with access to an additional source of
funds.
Principal Nonbanking Subsidiaries
UST Leasing Corporation, a subsidiary of USTrust organized in 1987, provides a
broad range of equipment leasing services to corporations headquartered
throughout the United States. UST Leasing Corporation offers a line of leasing
products designed to meet the needs of the Company's small business customers
and other business entities with similar needs. As of December 31, 1996, UST
Leasing Corporation's total assets were approximately $50 million.
UST Capital Corp., organized in 1961 and acquired by the Company in 1969, is a
subsidiary of USTC and is a licensed Small Business Investment Company. It
specializes in equity and long-term debt financing for growth-oriented
companies.
JSA Financial Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was
organized in 1959. In 1995 and 1996 this subsidiary acquired approximately $1.1
million and $5.1 million, respectively, of nonperforming and substandard assets
from the Company's former affiliate bank, UST Bank/Connecticut. Since that date,
it has been engaged in an active program to liquidate those assets. As of the
date of this Report, the value of the assets remaining on the books of JSA
Financial Corporation is approximately $4 million (which includes approximately
$2 million in cash).
Walden Financial Corporation, organized in 1975, is a subsidiary of Concord. It
operates as a leasing company, leasing depreciable equipment and buildings to
Concord and Braintree.
Competitive Conditions
The Company's banking and nonbanking subsidiaries face substantial competition
throughout Massachusetts. This competition is provided by commercial banks,
savings banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies, insurance companies,
"nonbank banks," mutual funds, government agencies, investment management
companies, investment advisors, brokers and investment bankers. In addition, the
Company anticipates increased competition from out-of-state and foreign banks
and bank holding companies as those entities increase their usage of interstate
banking powers granted since 1983 as well as by the 1994 enactment of the
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Act (discussed under "Supervision
and Regulation of the Company and its Subsidiaries" below). During the past six
years several factors have resulted in the development or establishment of
fewer, but financially stronger competitors in the local markets served by the
Company's banking subsidiaries. The most important of these factors include: (i)
the closing by regulators of a number of banks and bank holding companies in
Eastern Massachusetts; (ii) the acquisition during the early 1990's of small-
and medium-sized banks and bank holding companies by the largest New England
bank holding companies; (iii) the improved economic conditions during the
mid-1990's within the region; and (iv) the mergers of Fleet Financial Group and
Shawmut National Corporation and the Bank of Boston Corporation and BayBanks,
Inc., which resulted in the creation of two extremely large entities of what had
already been four of the five largest bank holding companies in New England.
Supervision and Regulation of the Company and its Subsidiaries
General
As a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
as amended (the "BHC Act"), the Company is subject to substantial regulation and
supervision by the Federal Reserve Board. As state-chartered banks, the
Subsidiary Banks are subject to substantial regulation and supervision
4
by the FDIC and the applicable state bank regulatory agencies. Such activities
are often intended primarily for the protection of depositors or are aimed at
carrying out broad public policy goals that may not be directly related to the
financial services provided by the Company and its subsidiaries. Federal and
state banking and other laws impose a number of requirements and restrictions on
the business operations, investments and other activities of depository
institutions and their affiliates.
General Supervision and Regulation
The Company, as a bank holding company under the BHC Act, is registered with the
Federal Reserve Board and is regulated under the provisions of the BHC Act.
Under the BHC Act the Company is prohibited, with certain exceptions, from
acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5 percent of the
voting shares of any company which is not a bank and from engaging in any
business other than that of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing
services to, or acquiring premises for, its affiliated banks, except that the
Company may engage in and own voting shares of companies engaging in certain
activities determined by the Federal Reserve Board, by order or by regulation,
to be so closely related to banking or to managing or controlling banks "as to
be a proper incident thereto."
The Company is required by the BHC Act to file with the Federal Reserve Board an
annual report and such additional reports as the Federal Reserve Board may
require. The Federal Reserve Board also makes periodic inspections of the
Company and its subsidiaries. The BHC Act requires every bank holding company to
obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before it may acquire
substantially all of the assets of any bank, or ownership or control of any
voting shares of any bank, if, after such acquisition, it would own or control,
directly or indirectly, more than 5 percent of the voting shares of such bank.
Because the Company is also a bank holding company under the Massachusetts
General Laws, the Massachusetts Commissioner has authority to require certain
reports from the Company from time to time and to examine the Company and each
of its subsidiaries. The Massachusetts Commissioner also has enforcement powers
designed to prevent banks from engaging in unfair methods of competition or
unfair or deceptive acts or practices involving consumer transactions. In 1996,
Massachusetts adopted legislation which allows well-capitalized banks to be
inspected by Massachusetts regulators once every 18 months in contrast to the
current yearly examination. Prior approval of the Massachusetts Board of Bank
Incorporation is also required before the Company may acquire any additional
commercial banks located in Massachusetts or in those states which permit
acquisitions of banking institutions located in their states by Massachusetts
bank holding companies.
The location of nonbank subsidiaries of the Company is not restricted
geographically under the BHC Act. In 1989, after the passage of the Financial
Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), the
Federal Reserve Board amended its regulations under the BHC Act to permit bank
holding companies, as a nonbanking activity, to own and operate savings
associations without geographical restrictions. Furthermore, in 1994, the
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Act of 1994 (the "Interstate
Banking Act") was enacted. The Interstate Banking Act's provisions, among other
things: (i) permit bank holding companies, under certain circumstances, to
acquire control of banks in any state, subject to (a) specified maximum national
and state deposit concentration limits; (b) any applicable state law provisions
requiring that the acquired bank has to have been in existence for a specified
period of up to 5 years; (c) any applicable nondiscriminatory state provisions
that make an acquisition of a bank contingent upon a requirement to hold a
portion of such bank's assets available for call by a state-sponsored housing
entity; and (d) applicable anti-trust laws; (ii) authorize interstate mergers by
banks in different states, including branching through bank mergers, beginning
June 1, 1997, subject to the provisions noted in (i) and to any state laws that
"opt-in" as of an earlier date or "opt-out" of the provision entirely; (iii)
authorize states to enact legislation permitting interstate de novo branching;
and (iv) provide for parity of treatment for foreign bank branch activities.
In 1996, Massachusetts enacted legislation implementing the provisions of the
Interstate Banking Act. In the new legislation, Massachusetts authorized
immediate "opt in" to interstate banking. Thus, the 1996 legislation
substantially facilitates the geographic expansion of banking by Massachusetts
and out-of-state banks. Unlike the Subsidiary Banks, national banks have used
the power available under a federal charter to move a bank's headquarters 30
miles or less and by that means have accelerated the pace of interstate
branching.
The 1996 legislation also allows out-of-state banks to establish and maintain
branches through a merger or consolidation with or the purchase of assets or
stock of any Massachusetts bank or through de novo branch establishment or
purchase of a branch without purchase of the bank which owns the branch, in
Massachusetts, provided that such out-of-state bank is expressly authorized to
do so by the laws of the state under which it is organized. The 1996 legislation
also allows Massachusetts banks to establish and
5
maintain branches through a merger or consolidation with or by the purchase of
the whole or any part of the assets or stock of any out-of-state bank of through
de novo branch establishment in any other state other than Massachusetts.
Finally, the 1996 legislation prohibits the establishment of bank holding
companies and acquisition of banks and bank holding companies by Massachusetts
and out-of-state bank holding companies if the Massachusetts bank to be acquired
has been in existence less than 3 years or if, after such acquisition, the bank
holding company would control 28% of the deposits in Massachusetts (until 1998,
when the deposit limitation is increased to 30%).
The Subsidiary Banks, whose deposits are insured by the FDIC, and the
subsidiaries of such banks are subject to a number of regulatory restrictions,
including certain restrictions upon: (i) extensions of credit to the Company and
the Company's nonbanking affiliates (collectively with the Company, the
"Affiliates"); (ii) the purchase of assets from Affiliates; (iii) the issuance
of a guarantee or acceptance of a letter of credit on behalf of Affiliates; and
(iv) investments in stock or other securities issued by Affiliates or acceptance
thereof as collateral for an extension of credit. In addition, all transactions
among the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries must be made on an
arm's length basis and valued on fair market terms. The Subsidiary Banks pay
deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC.
Federal Reserve Board policy requires bank holding companies to serve as a
source of strength to their subsidiary banks by standing ready to use available
resources to provide adequate capital funds to subsidiary banks during periods
of financial stress or adversity. A bank holding company also can be liable
under certain provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA") for the capital deficiencies of an
undercapitalized bank subsidiary. In the event of a bank holding company's
bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the trustee will be
deemed to have assumed and is required to cure immediately any deficit under any
commitment by the debtor to any of the federal banking agencies to maintain the
capital of an insured depository institution, and any claim for breach of such
obligation will generally have priority over most other unsecured claims. Under
the cross-guarantee provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, if any or
all of the Subsidiary Banks were placed in conservatorship or receivership, the
Company, as sole stockholder, would likely lose its investment in the applicable
Subsidiary Bank or Subsidiary Banks, and, in addition, its investment in its
other Subsidiary Bank or Subsidiary Banks would be at risk.
The Company and all its subsidiaries are also subject to certain restrictions
with respect to engaging in the issue, flotation, underwriting, public sale or
distribution of certain types of securities. In addition, under both Section 106
of the 1970 Amendments to the BHC Act and regulations which have been issued by
the Federal Reserve Board, the Company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from
engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of
credit, lease or sale of any property or the furnishing of any service. Various
consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of the Subsidiary
Banks.
The Subsidiary Banks, which are chartered under Massachusetts law, are subject
to federal requirements to maintain cash reserves against deposits, and to state
mandated restrictions upon the nature and amount of loans which may be made by
the banks (including restrictions upon loans to "insiders" of the Company and
its Subsidiary Banks) as well as to restrictions relating to dividends,
investments, branching and other bank activities.
FDICIA prescribes the supervisory and regulatory actions that will be taken
against undercapitalized insured depository institutions for the purposes of
promptly resolving problems at such institutions at the least possible long-term
loss to the FDIC. Five categories of depository institutions have been
established by FDICIA in accordance with their capital levels: "well
capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly
undercapitalized," and "critically undercapitalized." The federal banking
agencies have adopted uniform regulations to implement the prompt regulatory
action provisions of FDICIA.
Under the uniform regulations, a well capitalized institution has a minimum Tier
1 capital-to-total risk-based assets ratio of 6 percent, a minimum Total capital
to total risk-based assets ratio of 10 percent and a minimum leverage ratio of 5
percent and is not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive.
An adequately capitalized institution meets all of its minimum capital
requirements under the existing capital adequacy guidelines. An undercapitalized
institution is one that fails to meet any one of the three minimum capital
requirements. A significantly undercapitalized institution has a Tier 1 capital
to total risk-based assets ratio of less than 3 percent, a Tier 1 leverage
capital ratio of less than 3 percent or a Total capital to total risk-based
assets ratio of less than 6 percent. A critically undercapitalized institution
has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 2 percent or less. An institution whose capital
ratios meet the criteria for a well capitalized institution may be classified as
an adequately capitalized institution due to qualitative and/or quantitative
factors other than capital adequacy. An adequately capitalized institution or
undercapitalized institution may, under certain circumstances, be required to
comply with supervisory action as if it were in the next lower category. As of
December 31, 1996, all of the Subsidiary Banks were well capitalized with the
exception of USTrust. As of March 5, 1997, all of the Subsidiary Banks were well
capitalized, with the exception of USTrust
6
which was adequately capitalized. During a period from the consummation of the
twenty (20) branch purchase in December 1996 (described in further detail under
the caption entitled, "Recent Developments - Acquisition of Twenty (20) Bank of
Boston and BayBank Branches"), until March 5, 1997, USTrust's total capital to
total risk-based assets ratio temporarily fell below the requirements of an
adequately capitalized bank. The Company made a capital contribution on March 5,
1997 to address this requirement. For further discussion of this matter, refer
to Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
An undercapitalized institution is required to submit a capital restoration plan
for acceptance by the appropriate federal banking agency and will be subject to
close monitoring of both its condition and compliance with, and progress made
pursuant to, its capital restoration plan. The capital restoration plan will be
accepted only if: (i) it specifies the steps that will be taken to become
adequately capitalized and the activities in which the institution will engage;
(ii) it is based upon realistic assumptions and it is likely to succeed in
restoring the institution's capital; (iii) it does not appreciably increase the
institution's risk exposure; and (iv) each holding company that controls the
institution provides appropriate assurances of performance and guaranties that
the institution will comply with the plan until the institution is adequately
capitalized on an average basis for each of four consecutive quarters. Liability
under the guaranty is the lesser of (i) five percent of the institution's total
assets at the time it became undercapitalized and (ii) the amount necessary to
bring the institution into compliance with all applicable capital standards as
of the time the institution fails to comply with the plan. An institution that
fails to submit an acceptable plan may be placed into conservatorship or
receivership unless its capital restoration plan is accepted. An
undercapitalized institution will also be subject to restrictions on asset
growth, acquisitions, branching, new activities, capital distributions and the
payment of management fees.
FDICIA requires the appropriate regulatory agencies to take one or more specific
actions against significantly undercapitalized institutions and undercapitalized
institutions that fail to submit acceptable capital restoration plans, which
actions include but are not limited to: (i) requiring the institution to sell
shares or other obligations to raise capital; (ii) limiting deposit interest
rates; (iii) requiring the election of a new board of directors and/or
dismissing senior executive officers and directors who held such positions for
more than 180 days before the institution became undercapitalized; (iv)
prohibiting receipt of deposits from correspondent banks, (v) requiring
divestiture or liquidation of one or more subsidiaries; and (vi) requiring the
parent company to divest the institution if such divestiture will improve the
institution's financial condition and future prospects. In addition, an insured
institution that receives a less-than-satisfactory rating for asset quality,
management, earnings or liquidity may be deemed by its appropriate federal
banking regulator to be engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice for purposes
of issuing an order to cease and desist or to take certain affirmative actions.
If the unsafe or unsound practice is likely to weaken the institution, cause
insolvency or substantial dissipation of assets or earnings or otherwise
seriously prejudice the interest of depositors or the FDIC, a receiver or
conservator could be appointed. Finally, subject to certain exceptions FDICIA
requires critically undercapitalized institutions to be placed into receivership
or conservatorship within 90 days after becoming critically undercapitalized.
The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that it will consult with each federal
banking agency regulating the bank subsidiaries of a holding company to monitor
required supervisory actions, and based upon an assessment of these
developments, will take appropriate action at the holding company level.
Under FDICIA, federal bank regulators are also required to see that changes are
made in the operations and/or management of a bank or bank holding company if
the financial institution is deemed to be "undercapitalized." Under FDICIA, a
depository institution that is "adequately capitalized" but not "well
capitalized" is generally prohibited from accepting brokered deposits and
offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rates in its
market. In addition, "pass through" insurance coverage may not be available for
certain employee benefit accounts.
Additional regulations adopted pursuant to FDICIA include: (i) real estate
lending standards for depository institutions, which provide guidelines
concerning loan-to-value ratios for various types of real estate loans; (ii)
rules requiring depository institutions to develop and implement internal
procedures to evaluate and control credit and settlement exposure to their
correspondent banks; (iii) rules implementing the FDICIA provisions prohibiting,
with certain exceptions, insured state banks from making equity investments or
engaging in activities of the types and amounts not permissible for national
banks; and (iv) rules and guidelines for enhanced financial reporting and audit
requirements. Rules adopted pursuant to FDICIA include: (i) revisions to the
risk-based capital guidelines regarding interest rate risk, concentrations of
credit risk and the risks posed by "nontraditional activities;" and (ii) rules
addressing various "safety and soundness" standards.
In 1995, the Federal Reserve Board provided all bank holding companies with new
guidelines which direct examiners to provide separate supervisory ratings for
the risk management process of all bank holding companies. Pursuant to the
guidelines, examiners will evaluate the entire spectrum of risks facing
7
the Company including, but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity,
operational, legal and reputational risk. Under the guidelines, examiners are
directed to place primary consideration on findings relating to the following
elements: (i) active board and senior management oversight; (ii) adequate
policies, procedures and limits; (iii) adequate risk measurement, monitoring,
and management information systems; and (iv) comprehensive internal controls. In
1995, the Company established a Risk Management Committee to coordinate the
Company's management of applicable risks which reports to the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors of the Company.
The status of the Company as a registered bank holding company does not exempt
it from certain federal and state laws and regulations applicable to
corporations generally, including, without limitation, certain provisions of the
federal securities laws and the Massachusetts corporate laws. With the passage
of FIRREA in 1989, the Crime Control Act in 1990 and FDICIA in 1991, federal
bank regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC, were
granted substantially broader enforcement powers to restrict the activities of
financial institutions and to impose or seek the imposition of increased civil
and/or criminal penalties upon financial institutions, the individuals who
manage or control such institutions and "institution affiliated parties" of such
entities.
In 1996, legislation was enacted by Congress providing for the recapitalization
of the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF"). Savings associations and
commercial banks holding SAIF-insured deposits were assessed a one-time charge
in connection with the servicing of the debt incurred with respect to the thrift
bailout through the issuance of FICO bonds. USTrust acquired SAIF-insured
deposits, indirectly, through an affiliate on September 7, 1990, when it assumed
certain deposits and liabilities of the failed Home Owners Federal Loan Bank,
FSB, from the Resolution Trust Company. USTrust paid a one-time charge of $3
million in 1996. As a result of the foregoing, the deposit premiums which the
Subsidiary Banks pay to the FDIC have been reduced.
Pursuant to the federal Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") and similar
provisions of Massachusetts law, regulatory authorities review the performance
of the Company and its subsidiary banks in meeting the credit needs of the
communities served by the subsidiary banks. The applicable regulatory
authorities consider compliance with this law in connection with applications
for, among other things, approval of branches, branch relocations and
acquisitions of banks and bank holding companies. USTrust has received
"outstanding" ratings from the FDIC. The Massachusetts Commissioner has
continued to examine USTC for CRA compliance, and currently rates USTC
"satisfactory."
In 1994, the federal Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act
of 1994 (the "Community Development Act") was enacted. The Community Development
Act established financial and other assistance for entities involved primarily
in community development activities. The Community Development Act's provisions
also, among other items, (i) increased restrictions on some types of high
interest loans; (ii) improved small business access to capital; (iii) required
federal banking agencies to, among other things, coordinate examinations and
establish uniform regulations and guidelines where appropriate; and (iv) amended
certain requirements on insider loans. The Community Development Act had the
effect of reducing slightly certain regulatory burdens on financial
institutions, including the Company's subsidiaries.
From time to time various proposals are made in the United States Congress, as
well as state legislatures, which would alter the powers of, and place
restrictions on, different types of bank organizations as well as bank and
nonbank activities. Such legislative proposals include proposals related to
expansion of bank powers and increased consumer compliance disclosure
requirements. In early 1997, federal legislation was proposed which, if adopted,
would grant bank holding companies broader powers with respect to insurance and
securities activities. Under the proposed federal legislation, broader
cross-ownership would be authorized among banking, insurance and securities
companies. In addition, in 1997 legislation which would provide Massachusetts
chartered banks with broader insurance powers is being considered by the
Massachusetts legislature. At this time it is unclear whether either the
proposed federal or state legislation (in any form) will be adopted.
Accordingly, it is not possible to evaluate the effect of adoption of such
proposed legislation on the business of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Supervision, regulation and examination of the Subsidiary Banks by the bank
regulatory agencies are not intended for the protection of the Company's
security holders.
Governmental Policies, Economic Conditions and Credit Risk Concentration
The earnings and business of the Company's subsidiaries are and will be affected
by a number of external influences, including general economic conditions in the
United States and particularly in New England and the policies of various
regulatory authorities of the United States, including the Federal Reserve
Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of money and of bank
credit to influence general economic conditions within the United States and
throughout the world. From time to time, the Federal Reserve Board
8
takes specific steps to dampen domestic inflation and to control the country's
money supply. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve
Board for these purposes (including the level of cash reserves banks, including
nonmember banks such as all four of the Company's banking subsidiaries, are
required to maintain against deposits) influence in various ways the interest
rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and the interest received on earning
assets, and the overall level of bank loans, investments and deposits. The
impact upon the future business and earnings of the Company of prospective
domestic economic conditions, and of the policies of the Federal Reserve Board
as well as other U.S. regulatory authorities, cannot be predicted accurately.
During the period from 1990 through 1993, the Company's primary loan market, the
New England region, suffered from a weak economic environment. The economic
climate contributed to a decline in real estate values and adversely affected
the net worth of certain borrowing customers of the Company's subsidiary banks
and the Company's collateral position with respect to certain loans. The New
England regional economy improved in the mid-1990's, which aided the Company's
loan workout efforts over the past several years. In 1996, economic conditions
in the Company's principal markets improved at the same moderate pace as the
entire United States economy. Most of the Company's loans outstanding are from
borrowers located in Community Reinvestment Act delineated communities in
Massachusetts and a substantial portion of these loans are various types of real
estate loans; still others have real estate as additional collateral. At
year-end 1996, the Company's exposure to credit risk from borrowers who had real
estate as their primary collateral support included $729 million of loans. The
Base Lending Rate used by the Company's Subsidiary Banks and the costs they paid
for major sources of funds were essentially unchanged. In late 1996 and early
1997, a number of commentators and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board
suggested that interest rates might increase during 1997. Any renewed increases
in the Base Lending Rate used by the Company's Subsidiary Banks may have an
adverse effect upon the ability of some borrowers to repay their loans. In early
1997, the prices of marketable equity securities were at historically high
levels. A substantial diminution in the values of such marketable securities
could have an adverse effect upon the ability of some of the Company's borrowers
to repay loans outstanding to the Company's Subsidiary Banks and could reduce
gross fee income generated by the Asset Management Division of the United States
Trust Company.
General
No significant portion of the loans or deposits of any of the Company's banking
subsidiaries results from one or several accounts, the loss of which would
materially affect its business. The Company does not experience significant
seasonal fluctuations in its business.
Employees
As of December 31, 1996, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately
1,141 full-time and part-time employees. After the acquisition of Walden, as of
February 28, 1997, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 1,450
full-time and part-time employees.
ITEM 2. Properties
USTrust owns and occupies a twelve-story, 112,360 square foot brick and steel
building constructed in 1915 and located at Government Center, 30-40 Court
Street, Boston, Massachusetts which houses the banking premises of USTrust, USTC
and the offices of the Company and all of its nonbanking subsidiaries.
The Company currently leases a three-story brick office building of
approximately 37,900 square feet at 196 Broadway, Cambridge, Massachusetts, all
of which is used by USTrust, as well as 30,487 square feet in an adjacent office
tower at 141 Portland Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts. USTrust also leases
approximately 26,080 square feet of space at 25-55 Court Street, Boston,
Massachusetts, which is used primarily to house staff support services.
USTrust owns twenty branch offices in Boston, Cambridge, Canton, Dedham,
Gloucester, Milton, Milton Village, Natick, Needham, Newton, Norwood, Quincy,
Randolph, Somerville, Stoughton, Swampscott, Waltham, Watertown and West
Roxbury, Massachusetts. The remaining branch offices of the USTrust occupy
leased premises.
Braintree and Concord own 12 branch offices in Arlington, Braintree, Concord,
Hanover, Lexington, Norwell, Quincy and Randolph. The remaining branch offices
of Braintree and Concord occupy leased premises.
9
The 1997 annual leasehold commitment for all premises leased by the Company's
subsidiaries, including Walden and its subsidiaries, totals $5,449,364 not
including expenses related to tax or maintenance escalation provisions. Refer to
Note 16 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of operations, the Company and its subsidiaries become
defendants in a variety of judiciary and administrative proceedings. In the
opinion of management, however, there is no proceeding pending, or to the
knowledge of management threatened, which is likely to result in a material
adverse change in the financial condition or results of operations of the
Company and its subsidiaries.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At a Special Meeting of Stockholders held on December 17, 1996, the Stockholders
were asked to consider and vote upon proposals (i) to approve and adopt an
Affiliation Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of August 30, 1996,
between the Company and Walden and the corresponding Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of August 30, 1996, among the Company, an acquisition
subsidiary wholly-owned by the Company, and Walden as well as the transactions
contemplated thereby, including specifically the issuance of approximately 10.1
million shares of the Company's common stock to persons who were stockholders of
Walden immediately prior to the merger; and (ii) to amend the Company's Restated
Articles of Organization to increase the number of authorized shares of the
Company's common stock from 30,000,000 to 45,000,000. The following votes were
cast with respect to the two proposals:
In Favor Against Abstain Delivered, Not Voted
-------- ------- ------- --------------------
Walden Affiliation 10,036,402 34,282 90,617 1,475,432
Common Stock Increase 11,344,981 185,131 104,410 2,210
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Security Holder
Matters
The common stock of the Company is traded over the counter and its price is
quoted on the Nasdaq National Market System. During the period January 1, 1995
to December 31, 1996, the range of high and low sales prices for the Company's
common stock was as follows:
1996 1995
---- ----
Low High Low High
--- ---- --- ----
1st Quarter 13 15 1/8 9 3/4 11 3/8
2nd Quarter 12 3/4 15 1/8 10 1/2 13 1/2
3rd Quarter 14 1/4 17 1/8 13 1/4 15
4th Quarter 16 3/4 20 5/8 12 3/4 15 1/2
Such over-the-counter market quotations reflect interdealer prices, without
retail markup, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
The number of holders of record of common stock of the Company was 2,894 at
January 31, 1997.
The Company did not pay cash dividends from mid-1991 until the fourth quarter of
1995, at which time the Company declared and paid a cash dividend of $0.05 per
share to each holder of its common stock. During 1996, the Company gradually
increased the cash dividends declared to $0.08 per share in the fourth quarter.
The Company declared cash dividends totaling $0.29 per share to each holder of
its common stock in 1996.
Future dividends will depend upon the financial condition and earnings of the
Company and its subsidiaries, their need for funds and other factors, including
applicable government regulations and the absence of regulatory objection.
10
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated Summary of Selected Financial Data (1)
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings Data:
Interest income $ 157,654 $ 147,969 $ 132,312 $ 140,628 $ 157,024
Interest expense 61,528 52,535 40,213 47,944 68,970
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income 96,126 95,434 92,099 92,684 88,054
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (18,600) 13,090 24,281 68,427 42,245
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income after
provision for possible loan losses 114,726 82,344 67,818 24,257 45,809
Noninterest income 37,288 29,970 30,334 36,723 42,359
Noninterest expense 98,338 88,187 91,355 93,341 95,820
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before income
taxes 53,676 24,127 6,797 (32,361) (7,652)
Income tax provision (benefit) 21,014 9,169 2,051 (12,261) (2,931)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 32,662 $ 14,958 $ 4,746 $ (20,100) $ (4,721)
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Per share data:
Net income (loss) $ 1.79 $ .83 $ .27 $ (1.31) $ (.34)
Cash dividends declared $ .29 $ .05
Weighted average common shares outstanding 18,227,036 18,068,203 17,780,032 15,362,251 13,984,190
Consolidated Average Balances(2):
Total assets $ 2,066,904 $ 1,836,229 $ 1,881,429 $ 2,042,567 $ 2,270,874
Loans 1,359,326 1,265,098 1,283,464 1,435,665 1,584,390
Deposits 1,532,086 1,474,636 1,527,113 1,635,178 1,826,738
Funds borrowed(3) 328,779 185,666 192,115 244,775 268,519
Stockholders' investment 184,967 163,651 152,256 143,149 147,440
Consolidated Ratios:
Net income (loss) to average total assets 1.58% .81% .25% (.98)% (.21)%
Net income (loss) to average
stockholders' investment 17.66% 9.14% 3.12% (14.04)% (3.20)%
Average stockholders' investment to
average total assets 8.9% 8.9% 8.1% 7.0% 6.5%
Net (recoveries) chargeoffs to average loans (0.3)% 1.7% 1.9% 3.8% 2.6%
Reserve for possible loan losses to period end loans 2.1% 4.4% 5.0% 4.8% 3.4%
Average earning assets to average total assets 94.7% 94.8% 93.9% 93.0% 91.2%
Dividend Payout Ratio 16.2% 6.0%
</TABLE>
(1) This information should be read in connection with Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
of this Form 10-K.
(2) Average balances do not include the effect of fair value adjustments
under SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities."
(3) Includes federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, short-term and
other borrowings.
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements, notes, and tables included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. Certain amounts reported for prior periods
have been reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation. The discussion
contains certain forward-looking statements regarding the future performance of
the Company. All forward-looking information is inherently uncertain and actual
results may differ materially from the assumptions, estimates, or expectations
reflected or contained in the forward-looking information. Please refer to
"Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Information" of this Form 10-K
for a further discussion.
11
Highlights
Operating results for the year ended December 31, 1996, reflect the Company's
emphasis on new business development and acquisition activities. Net income for
the year, which included a number of one-time charges and credits, was $32.7
million, or $1.79 per share, a 118 percent increase over the $15.0 million, or
$0.83 per share, earned in 1995. Through business development efforts and
acquisition activities the Company grew from a resource base of $2.0 billion in
1995 to over $2.7 billion in resources at year-end 1996. In the fourth quarter
of 1996, the Company's principal banking subsidiary, USTrust, completed the
purchase of twenty banking branches and assumption of $744 million in deposit
liabilities and repurchase agreements and $508 million in loans from two local
banking subsidiaries of Bank of Boston Corporation ("the Branch Purchase"). Also
during the fourth quarter the Company completed the sale of its Connecticut
banking subsidiary, UST Bank/Connecticut ("UST/Conn"). Other acquisition
activities included the execution of an agreement to acquire Walden Bancorp,
Inc. ("Walden"), a $1.0 billion multi-bank holding company headquartered in
Acton, Massachusetts. The Walden acquisition was completed on January 3, 1997.
Refer to Note 2 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this
Form 10-K for a further discussion of acquisitions and divestitures.
The one-time charges and credits that influenced 1996 earnings included an
earnings credit of $18.6 million recorded through the provision for possible
loan losses, which reflects the established quality of the loan portfolio. Refer
to "Credit Quality and Reserve for Possible Loan Losses" for a further
discussion of provisions and the reserve. Other one-time items included a $6.8
million gain from the sale of UST/Conn, $5.9 million in acquisition-related
charges, and a $3.0 million assessment on certain deposits insured by the
Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF").
The continued reduction in foreclosed asset and workout expense and reduced FDIC
insurance assessments were also major factors supporting the 1996 operating
results.
Financial Condition at December 31, 1996
Assets
Total assets at December 31, 1996 were $2.707 billion, an increase of 37
percent, or $738 million from $1.969 billion a year ago. The increase was
largely attributed to the loans and other assets acquired in the Branch
Purchase, partially offset by the reduction in assets due to the sale of
UST/Conn. Total loans increased $576 million to $1.848 billion reflecting $508
million in loans acquired through the Branch Purchase and internal growth,
reduced by $70 million in connection with the UST/Conn sale. Internal net loan
growth was approximately 11 percent, or $138 million, compared with a slight net
reduction in loans of $5 million, in 1995. Federal funds sold increased $127
million primarily supported by a similar increase in short-term borrowings.
Intangible assets increased $49 million to $54 million at year-end 1996
reflecting a deposit premium paid in connection with the Branch Purchase. The
increase in Premises, Furniture and Equipment reflects the fixed assets of the
twenty additional branches acquired in the Branch Purchase. Partially offsetting
these asset increases was a reduction in securities of $47 million to $528
million.
12
Loans
The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commercial and financial $ 746,762 $ 642,940 $ 705,075 $ 760,446 $ 862,590
Commercial real estate:
Construction 27,256 16,937 13,109 35,295 50,427
Developer, investor and land 172,390 207,710 265,624 321,965 368,871
Consumer:
Residential mortgage 443,071 85,806 90,643 85,889 57,896
Home equity 86,046 70,066 64,068 63,188 67,010
Indirect automobile installment(1) 301,072 197,148 90,255 31,848 42,786
Other consumer(1) 31,026 23,015 21,964 23,944 26,914
Lease financing 40,519 28,455 25,945 26,348 28,312
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total loans(2) 1,848,142 1,272,077 1,276,683 1,348,923 1,504,806
Reserve for possible loan losses (38,789) (56,029) (64,088) (64,465) (50,478)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
$ 1,809,353 $ 1,216,048 $ 1,212,595 $ 1,284,458 $ 1,454,328
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
(1) Indirect automobile installment loans represent loans purchased without
recourse from automobile dealers which conform to the Company's
underwriting standards. The Company and its subsidiary banks do not
engage in subprime automobile lending. Automobile loans made directly to
consumers are not significant and are included with other consumer loans.
(2) Excluded from the loan balances at December 31, 1996 and 1995 were $.1
million and $13.1 million, respectively, in loans held-for-sale, recorded
at net realizable value and classified as other assets.
The loan portfolio mix changed significantly during the year. As of December 31,
1996, total consumer loans represent 47 percent of the Company's loan portfolio
while commercial and commercial real estate loans and leases represent 53
percent. This compares with a consumer loan percentage of 30 percent and
commercial loans and leases of 70 percent in 1995. The 1996 increase in the
consumer loan percentage reflects portfolio growth and portfolio additions from
the Branch Purchase.
The Company's commercial loan portfolios listed above totaled $946 million at
December 31, 1996, an increase of $79 million from a year ago. Commercial loans
acquired in the Branch Purchase totaled $111 million while commercial loans sold
in the UST/Conn sale were approximately $19 million. Excluding the acquisition
and divestiture activities, commercial loans decreased approximately $13 million
as normal amortization slightly outpaced new commercial loan volume during the
year. Prior to 1996 the commercial loan portfolio had been experiencing a sharp
decline due to the combination of normal amortization and the aggressive
reduction of problem loans through collection, chargeoff, third-party
refinancing, or sale.
Residential loans increased $357 million during the year to $443 million. The
increase reflects $380 million of residential loans acquired in the Branch
Purchase as reduced by normal amortization during the year and a $9 million
reduction in connection with the UST/Conn sale. Internal growth in residential
mortgage loans in 1996 was minimal as the Company elected to discontinue the
origination of these loans. The residential mortgage industry has become
increasingly the purview of large scale providers which prompted the Company's
subsidiary banks, after careful consideration, to take such action. With the
exception of residential loans obtained through acquisition, future growth in
this portfolio is not expected.
The strong growth in the indirect automobile portfolio of the prior two years
continued in 1996. This portfolio totaled $301 million at December 31, 1996, and
reflects net growth of 53 percent, or $104 million, this year compared with
growth of $107 million last year. The Company's "Prime Always" home equity loan
product and promotional campaign produced a 23 percent net growth in that
portfolio, or $16 million. Such growth is net of a $10 million reduction in
connection with the UST/Conn sale. The other consumer loan category increased $8
million mostly due to acquired cash reserve advance accounts from the Branch
Purchase. The lease financing portfolio reflects growth of 42 percent, or $12
million during the year. A portion of this growth, $5 million, was directly
related to the Branch Purchase.
13
Loan Maturity Distribution
The following table reflects the maturity and interest sensitivity of commercial
and financial, and commercial real estate loans, at December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
After 1 Year
(Dollars in thousands) 1 Year or Less through 5 Years After 5 Years Total
-------------- --------------- ------------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commercial and financial $ 473,372 $ 218,935 $ 54,455 $ 746,762
Commercial real estate:
Construction 7,790 10,044 9,422 27,256
Developer, investor and land 64,951 78,226 29,213 172,390
-------------- --------------- ------------- -----------
$ 546,113 $ 307,205 $ 93,090 $ 946,408
============== =============== ============= ===========
Interest sensitivity of above loans:
With predetermined interest rates $ 142,569 $ 111,193 $ 52,974 $ 306,736
With floating interest rates 403,544 196,012 40,116 639,672
-------------- --------------- ------------- -----------
$ 546,113 $ 307,205 $ 93,090 $ 946,408
============== =============== ============= ===========
</TABLE>
The Company does not have an automatic rollover (renewal) policy for maturing
loans. Renewal requests are reviewed and approved in substantially the same
manner as applications by new customers for extensions of credit. Additionally,
any renewal of a loan rated Substandard or lower in the Company's credit risk
rating profile requires the Controlled Loan Department head approval, and for
certain size loans and circumstances, the approval of the Senior Credit
Committee and Board of Directors.
Securities
The 1996 decrease of $47 million in securities was due to normal amortization, a
$22 million reduction in connection with the UST/Conn sale, sales of certain
below market-yielding securities, and net sales to accommodate cash flow
requirements. Adding to the decrease was a change from an unrealized gain on
securities available-for-sale of $1.7 million at December 31, 1995 to an
unrealized loss of $4.3 million at December 31, 1996, a $6 million decrease in
fair value. The decline in market value of the portfolio was directly related to
the downward movement in bond prices experienced earlier in the year. Refer to
Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further
discussion of the unrealized valuation adjustment to market value of securities
available-for-sale as required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115 ("SFAS No. 115"), "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities."
The change in the market value of securities available-for-sale also had the
effect of decreasing stockholders' investment by $3.5 million since year-end
1995. The unrealized gain reported as part of stockholders' investment of $1.0
million, net of tax at December 31, 1995, changed to an unrealized loss of $2.5
million, net of tax at December 31, 1996.
Partially offsetting the above-mentioned decreases to securities was the
purchase of $38.9 million in Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston ("FHLBB") stock by
a banking subsidiary, USTrust. The bank became a member of the FHLBB during the
year and is required to invest in the FHLBB in an amount equal to the greater of
1 percent of residential mortgage loans, including certain mortgage-backed
securities, or three tenths of 1 percent of total assets or a specified
percentage of outstanding advances.
The Company has a policy of purchasing securities primarily rated A or better by
Moody's Investors Services and U.S. Government securities to minimize credit
risk. As of December 31, 1996, all of the Company's mortgage-backed securities
were issued by agencies or sponsored agencies of the U.S. Government. Also at
December 31, 1996, none of the Company's mortgage-backed securities would be
classified as "high risk" under Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council guidelines. All securities, however, carry interest rate risk which
affects their market value such that as market yields increase, the value of the
Company's securities declines and vice versa. Additionally, mortgage-backed
securities carry prepayment risk where expected yields may not be achieved due
to an inability to re-invest the proceeds from prepayment at comparable yields.
Moreover, such mortgage-backed securities may not benefit from price
appreciation in periods of declining rates to the same extent as the remainder
of the portfolio. Refer to Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of this Form 10-K for a
further discussion of prepayment risk. The following table sets forth the book
value of the securities owned by the Company:
14
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities $ 216,978 $ 246,521
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies and corporations 170,061 196,967
Obligations of states and political subdivisions* 2,275 3,254
Other securities 138,860 128,931
------------ -----------
Total $ 528,174 $ 575,673
============ ===========
* Non-taxable
</TABLE>
The following table presents maturities for the Company's securities at December
31, 1996, and the approximate weighted tax equivalent yields (at the statutory
federal tax rate of 35 percent). Mortgage-backed securities are shown at or
based on their final maturity but are expected to have shorter average lives.
Considering this, the Company estimates the average life of the entire portfolio
to be 2.2 years. Yields presented in this table have been computed using the
amortized cost of the securities.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Securities Maturing In
1 Year or Less After 1-Yr. through 5 5-Yrs. through 10 10 Yrs. or more
(Dollars in thousands) Balance Yield Balance Yield Balance Yield Balance Yield
------- ----- ------- ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities $ 591 8.14% $ 63,040 6.51% $153,347 6.16%
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government
agencies and corporations $ 3,550 5.62% 142,481 5.50% 24,030 5.48%
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions 201 8.10% 763 8.29% 819 9.18% 492 8.67%
Other securities 30,134 6.21% 54,952 6.03% 7,100 5.36%
------- -------- -------- --------
Total $33,885 6.16% $198,787 5.67% $ 94,989 6.19% $153,839 6.17%
======= ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the Company owned the following corporate notes, whose
aggregate fair value was in excess of 10 percent of stockholders' investment.
(Dollars in thousands) Aggregate Market Value
General Motors Acceptance Corporation Medium Term Notes $20,102
The corporate notes are unsecured and are of investment grade and carry the
normal credit risk associated with such instruments.
Liquidity and Funding
Liquidity involves the Company's ability to raise or gain access to funds in
order to fulfill its existing and anticipated financial obligations. It may be
provided through amortization, maturity or sale of assets such as loans and
securities available-for-sale, liability sources such as increased deposits,
utilization of the FHLBB credit facility, purchased or other borrowed funds, and
access to the capital markets. The Company's securities portfolio is classified
entirely as available-for-sale, which provides the flexibility to sell certain
securities based upon changes in economic or market conditions, interest rate
risk and the Company's financial position and liquidity.
At December 31, 1996, liquidity, which includes excess cash, federal funds sold
and unpledged securities, totaled approximately $283 million, or 10 percent of
total assets, a $34 million decrease from 1995.
The funds needed to support the Company's loan and securities portfolios are
provided through a combination of commercial and retail deposits and short-term
borrowings. Total deposits increased $593 million, or 39 percent, to $2.106
billion since December 31, 1995. The large increase in deposits was due to the
assumption of $667 million in deposits as part of the Branch Purchase partially
offset by a reduction of $95 million in connection with the sale of UST/Conn.
These significant events had the effect of increasing NOW, money market and
regular savings deposits by $339 million. In addition, noninterest-bearing
deposits increased $167 million and time deposits increased $87 million.
15
As shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents
increased $21.7 million during 1996. Cash provided by operations resulted
largely from net interest income from loans and securities, less the net
difference of noninterest expense over noninterest income. Cash provided by
financing activities was due principally to the net increases in deposits and in
short-term and other borrowings, offset in part by dividends paid and treasury
stock acquisitions. Net cash used by investing activities was due to net
increases in federal funds sold and loans offset in part by net cash acquired
from the Branch Purchase, net proceeds from the sale of a bank subsidiary, and
an excess of proceeds from the sales and maturities of securities over purchases
of securities.
At December 31, 1996, the parent company had $1 million in cash and due from
banks and $14 million in short-term securities purchased under agreements to
resell, compared with $1 million cash and due from banks and $5 million in
short-term securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 1995.
For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company received a total of $6 million
in dividends from its asset management and trust subsidiary, United States Trust
Company ("USTC"), $5.7 million from USTrust, $1 million from JSA Financial
Corporation ("JSA"), a nonbanking subsidiary of the Company specializing in the
liquidation of problem assets, and $3 million from UST/Conn. During the same
period $13 million was contributed to USTrust. This capital contribution to
USTrust facilitated the purchase of 20 former Bank of Boston and BayBank
branches.
Deposits
The following table sets forth the remaining maturities of certificates of
deposit in the amount of $100 thousand or more at December 31, 1996:
(Dollars in thousands)
Less than three months $ 80,210
Three to six months 14,779
Six to twelve months 9,707
Over twelve months 14,166
--------------
Total $ 118,862
==============
Short-term Borrowings
The Company's short-term borrowings consist primarily of federal funds
purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and FHLBB borrowings.
These instruments are generally overnight funds.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, For the Year Ended December 31,
------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average Maximum Amount Average Amount Weighted Average
(Dollars in thousands) Balance Interest Rate at Any Month End Outstanding Interest Rate
------- ------------- ---------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Federal funds purchased:
1996 $ 96,677 5.73% $ 96,677 $ 68,551 5.35%
1995 57,406 5.63% 58,013 40,020 5.86%
1994 19,296 6.00% 35,061 29,090 4.14%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:
1996 $236,552 4.73% $ 286,109 $ 227,265 4.70%
1995 172,689 4.73% 172,689 127,752 4.85%
1994 126,597 4.48% 155,709 137,139 3.22%
FHLBB borrowings:
1996 $ 272,500 $ 24,795 5.48%
</TABLE>
Interest Rate Risk
Volatility in interest rates requires the Company to manage interest rate risk
which arises from differences in the timing of repricing of assets and
liabilities. Management monitors and adjusts the difference between
interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities ("GAP" position)
within various time frames. An institution with more assets repricing than
liabilities within a given time frame is considered asset sensitive ("positive
GAP") and in time frames with more liabilities repricing than assets it is
liability sensitive
16
("negative GAP"). Within GAP limits established by the Board of Directors, the
Company seeks to balance the objective of insulating the net interest margin
from rate exposure with that of taking advantage of anticipated changes in rates
in order to enhance income. The Company's policy is to limit its one-year
cumulative GAP position to 2.5 times equity, presently equal to approximately 18
percent of total assets. The Company has historically managed its interest rate
GAP primarily by lengthening or shortening the maturity structure of its
securities portfolio.
The Company's GAP presentation may not reflect the degrees to which
interest-earning assets and core deposit costs respond to changes in market
interest rates. The Company's rate-sensitive assets consist primarily of loans
tied to the prime rate and to a lesser extent the London Interbank Offered Rate
("LIBOR"). A small decline in the prime rate was realized during the first
quarter of 1996, which, along with a general external pressure on loan pricing,
had the effect of a reduction in the Company's yield on earning assets.
The following table summarizes the Company's GAP position at December 31, 1996.
The majority of commercial loans, as well as home equity loans, are included in
0-30 days as they reprice in response to changes in the interest rate
environment. Interest-bearing deposits are classified according to their
expected interest rate sensitivity. Actual sensitivity of these deposits is
reviewed periodically and adjustments are made in the Company's GAP analysis as
management deems appropriate. Securities and noninterest-bearing demand deposits
are categorized according to their expected lives based on published industry
prepayment estimates in the case of securities and current management estimates
for demand deposits. Securities are evaluated in conjunction with the Company's
asset/liability management strategy and may be purchased or sold in response to
expected or actual changes in interest rates, credit risk, prepayment risk, loan
growth and similar factors. The reserve for possible loan losses is included in
the "Over 1 Year" category of loans. At December 31, 1996, the one-year
cumulative GAP position was positive at $61 million, or approximately 2 percent
of total assets.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Interest Sensitivity Periods
(Dollars in millions) 0-30 Days 31-90 Days 91-365 Days Over 1 Year Total
--------- ---------- ----------- ----------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loans, net of reserve $ 787 $ 40 $ 162 $ 820 $ 1,809
Federal funds sold 127 127
Securities 25 50 68 385 528
Other assets 26 217 243
------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Total assets $ 965 $ 90 $ 230 $ 1,422 $ 2,707
------- ------- ------- -------- ========
Interest-bearing deposits $ 412 $ 96 $ 249 $ 809 $ 1,566
Borrowed funds 348 348
Noninterest-bearing deposits 119 421 540
Other liabilities and stockholders' equity 253 253
------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and equity $ 879 $ 96 $ 249 $ 1,483 $ 2,707
------- ------- ------- -------- ========
GAP for period $ 86 $ (6) $ (19) $ (61)
======= ------- ------- --------
Cumulative GAP $ 80 $ 61 $ 0
======= ======= ========
As a percent of total assets 3.18% 2.96% 2.25%
</TABLE>
Capital
There are three capital requirements which banks and bank holding companies must
meet. Two requirements take into consideration risks inherent in assets for both
on- and off-balance sheet items on a risk-weighted basis ("risk-based assets").
Risk weightings are as determined by banking regulators for the industry as a
whole. Under these requirements, the Company must meet minimum Tier 1 and Total
risk-based capital ratios (capital, as defined in the regulations, divided by
risk-based assets) of 4 percent and 8 percent, respectively. Tier 1 capital is
essentially shareholders' investment, net of intangible assets and Tier 2
capital is the allowable portion of the loan loss reserve (as defined) and
discounted subordinated debt. Total capital is the combination of Tier 1 and
Tier 2. The third requirement is a leverage capital ratio, defined as Tier 1
capital divided by total average assets, net of intangibles. All but the most
highly-rated banks are required to maintain a minimum of 4 percent. The Company
has not been notified of a specific requirement above the minimum. All three
capital ratios are calculated excluding the effect of SFAS No. 115 and
unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale.
17
As a condition to FDIC approval of the acquisition of sixteen BayBank branches,
USTrust was required to have a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of not less than
(i) 4.8 percent, no later than ten days after consummation of the acquisition of
the BayBank branches; and (ii) 5 percent, no later than three months after
acquisition of the BayBank branches and for a period of six months thereafter.
The Company currently anticipates that USTrust will maintain a Tier 1 leverage
ratio equal to or in excess of the foregoing conditions. In addition, the
Company expects that the foregoing conditions will not have a material adverse
impact on the future operations of USTrust.
As of December 31, 1996, all of the subsidiary banks were well capitalized, with
the exception of USTrust. As of March 5, 1997, all of the subsidiary banks were
well capitalized with the exception of USTrust which was adequately capitalized.
During a period from the consummation of the Branch Purchase in December, 1996
(described in further detail under the caption entitled, "Recent Developments -
Acquisition of Twenty (20) Bank of Boston and BayBank Branches," in Part I of
this Form 10-K) until March 5, 1997, USTrust's Total capital to total
risked-based assets ratio temporarily fell below the requirement of an
adequately capitalized bank. The Company made a capital contribution to USTrust
on March 5, 1997 in order to meet this requirement. For further discussion of
capital requirements, refer to Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In 1996, the Company declared quarterly cash dividends totaling $5.2 million, or
$0.29 per share, to stockholders. Also, during the year the Company received
dividends from subsidiaries of $6 million from USTC, $5.7 million from USTrust,
$1 million from JSA Financial Corporation and $3 million from UST/Conn, a former
banking subsidiary sold during the year. The Company contributed capital of $13
million to USTrust in 1996 to facilitate the Branch Purchase.
In 1995, the Company's Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program
and the Company adopted a shareholder rights plan. The stock repurchase program
was terminated in 1996 and all shares acquired thereunder were reissued. Refer
to Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K
for a discussion.
Credit Quality and Reserve for Possible Loan Losses
At year-end 1995, the Company had reduced the level of substandard loans to
levels which were comparable to industry peer group averages. While improvement
in credit quality is no longer a major strategic focus, the Company remains
committed to the maintenance of its current credit standards and in ensuring the
continued quality of the loan and lease portfolios. This year the Company was
successful in further reducing the level of substandards from $44 million at
year-end 1995 to $30 million at December 31, 1996, a 32 percent reduction. Loans
reported as substandard include loans classified as Substandard or Doubtful, as
determined by the Company in its internal credit risk rating profile. Under the
Company's definition, Substandard loans, which include loans on nonaccrual, are
characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if
the credit deficiencies are not corrected. The Substandard classification,
however, does not necessarily imply ultimate loss for each individual loan so
classified. Loans classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in
Substandard loans with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make
collection of 100 percent of the assets questionable and improbable.
At December 31, 1996, Substandard and Doubtful loans were $29.1 million and $.5
million, respectively. Substandard loans include $5.6 million of accruing
commercial and commercial real estate loans, of which 99 percent were current
with respect to contractual principal and interest payments, and $23.5 million
in loans that were on nonaccrual and included in nonperforming assets. All of
the loans rated Doubtful were on nonaccrual and included in nonperforming
assets. Also, at December 31, 1996, loans rated Special Mention in the Company's
internal risk rating profile amounted to $4.2 million, all of which were
current. Special Mention loans, as defined by the Company, have potential
weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these
potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for
the assets.
As of year-end 1996, approximately 35 percent of loans classified as Substandard
or Doubtful were collateralized by real estate, and the remainder were
collateralized by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other business
assets. Of the loans secured by real estate, approximately 60 percent were
collateralized by owner-occupied commercial properties, approximately 30 percent
were collateralized by commercial real estate development, and approximately 5
percent by residential real estate. The remaining loans were collateralized by
real estate under construction and raw land.
18
Nonperforming Assets
The following table sets forth the Company's total nonperforming assets and
performance measures regarding key indicators of asset quality:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Nonperforming assets:
Nonaccruals:
Commercial and financial $ 22,680 $ 14,531 $ 36,754 $ 28,511 $ 55,893
Commercial real estate:
Construction 16 44 551 1,025 16,558
Developer, investor and land 1,495 3,114 18,447 25,475 24,461
Consumer:
Residential mortgage 887 956 3,373 3,601 2,518
Home equity 522 741 656 190 1,240
Indirect automobile installment 778 446 134 40 271
Other consumer 46 98 29 540 550
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total nonaccrual 26,424 19,930 59,944 59,382 101,491
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due 363 257 1,409 557 1,091
Other real estate owned (OREO), net(1) 688 3,015 9,958 11,270 28,644
Restructured loans(2) 45 5,783 15,757 41,477 44,899
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total nonperforming assets $ 27,520 $ 28,985 $ 87,068 $112,686 $176,125
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Reserve for possible loan losses $ 38,789 $ 56,029 $ 64,088 $ 64,465 $ 50,478
Net (recoveries) chargeoffs $ (3,464) $ 21,149 $ 24,658 $ 54,440 $ 41,867
OREO reserve $ 320 $ 568 $ 1,044 $ 4,635 $ 389
Ratios:
Reserve to nonaccrual loans 146.8% 281.1% 106.9% 108.6% 49.7%
Reserve to total of nonaccrual loans, accruing loans
90 days or more past due and restructured loans 144.6% 215.7% 83.1% 63.6% 34.2%
Reserve to period-end loans 2.1% 4.4% 5.0% 4.8% 3.4%
Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans 1.4% 1.6% 4.7% 4.4% 6.7%
Nonaccrual loans and accruing loans over 90 days past
due to period-end loans 1.4% 1.6% 4.8% 4.4% 6.8%
Nonperforming assets to period-end loans and OREO 1.5% 2.3% 6.8% 8.3% 11.5%
Nonperforming assets to total assets 1.0% 1.5% 4.8% 5.5% 8.1%
Net (recoveries) chargeoffs to average loans (0.3%) 1.7% 1.9% 3.8% 2.6%
OREO reserve to OREO 31.7% 15.9% 9.5% 29.1% 1.3%
</TABLE>
(1) Other real estate owned ("OREO") represents assets to which title to the
collateral has been taken through foreclosure or in settlement of loans.
Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of the recorded
investment in the loan or fair value minus estimated costs to sell ("net
realizable value"). Included in OREO are automobiles owned which are
vehicles repossessed for reason of nonpayment. The balance is stated at
the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or net realizable value.
(2) Restructured loans are those where interest rates and/or principal
repayments have been restructured to defer or reduce payment as a result
of financial difficulties of the borrower.
As exhibited in the preceding table, the steep decline in nonperforming assets
in the earlier years leveled off in 1996. Nonperforming assets at December 31,
1996 of $28 million were within industry norms relative to the Company's size
and total volume of loans. Nonaccrual loans increased from $19.9 million last
year to $26.4 million at year-end 1996. The December 31, 1996 balance includes a
$8 million loan to a single commercial borrower which paid off in the first
quarter of 1997 with a minor chargeoff of loan principal. Restructured loans
decreased from $5.8 million last year to a nominal amount this year. The
improvement in asset quality and reduction in nonperforming loans has directly
contributed to the decreasing amount of net chargeoffs recorded by the Company.
In 1996, the Company recorded net recoveries of $3.4 million. Nonaccrual loans
were 1.4 percent of total loans at December 31, 1996 compared with 1.6 percent a
year ago. Nonperforming assets were 1.0 percent of total assets compared with
1.5 percent last year.
19
At December 31, 1996, total impaired loans were $24.2 million, comprised of $.5
million that required a reserve for possible loan losses of $.3 million and
$23.7 million that did not require a related reserve. Impaired loans, as defined
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 ("SFAS No. 114"),
"Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," are commercial and
commercial real estate loans recognized by the Company as nonaccrual and
restructured. Refer to Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of this Form 10-K for a further discussion on SFAS No. 114. The amount of
interest on December 31, 1996 impaired loans that would have been recorded had
the loans been paying in accordance with their original terms during 1996 was
approximately $2.6 million. The amount of interest income on these loans
included in net income in 1996 was approximately $.5 million.
Credit Quality Monitoring
Credit quality within the commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios
of each subsidiary is quantified by an internal credit risk rating system
designed to parallel regulatory criteria and categories of loan risk. Lenders
monitor their loans to ensure appropriate rating assignments are made on a
timely basis. Risk ratings and overall loan quality are also assessed on a
regular basis by an independent Loan Review Department which reports to the
Company's Board of Directors and its Asset Quality Committee. Loan Review
personnel conduct ongoing portfolio trend analyses and individual credit reviews
to evaluate loan risk and compliance with corporate lending policies. Results
and recommendations from this process provide senior management and the Board of
Directors and its Asset Quality Committee with independent information on loan
portfolio condition. The Asset Quality Committee monitors asset quality monthly
and actively reviews the large credit exposures.
The Company's commercial lending, credit and loan administration departments are
charged with ensuring compliance with lending policies, procedures and
administrative guidelines for the commercial portfolio. In addition, an
Appraisal Department reviews third-party real estate loan collateral appraisals
to ensure adherence to federal requirements and the Company's lending policies.
There is a Controlled Loan Department with specialized expertise in handling
most of the Company's nonaccrual and other troubled loans. In order to ensure
the effectiveness of credit quality monitoring systems, monitoring controls are
periodically reviewed and tested by the Company's Internal Audit Department.
The credit quality of the lease financing receivables portfolio is measured by
the same credit rating system described above. Consumer loan quality is
evaluated on the basis of delinquent data due to the large number of such loans
and relatively small size of individual credits. Historical trend analysis
reports are reviewed on a monthly basis by senior lending officers and the
Company's Board of Directors.
Past due nonconsumer loans, nonaccrual loans, and troubled debt restructurings
are reviewed at least quarterly by a Special Assets Committee whose membership
includes the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Loan Review Department
management and the most senior lending officers in the major lending and
credit-related divisions. Loans are placed on nonaccrual when there is doubt as
to the collectibility of interest or principal, or if loans are 90 days or more
past due unless they are both well secured and in the process of collection. In
every case, a loan reaching 180 days past due is placed on nonaccrual.
Reserve for Possible Loan Losses
The Company maintains a reserve for possible loan losses to absorb future
chargeoffs of loans and leases in the existing portfolio. The reserve is
increased when a loan loss provision is recorded in the income statement. When a
loan, or portion thereof, is considered uncollectible, it is charged against the
reserve. Recoveries on amounts previously charged-off are added to the reserve
when collected. Adequacy of the reserve for possible loan losses is determined
using a consistent, systematic methodology which analyzes the size and risk of
the loan and lease portfolio on a monthly basis. Factors in this analysis
include historical loss experience and asset quality, as reflected by
delinquency trends, nonaccrual and restructured loans and the Company's credit
risk rating profile. Consideration is also given to the current and expected
economic conditions and, in particular, how such conditions affect the types of
credits in the portfolio and the market area in general. This analysis is
documented using a combination of numerical and qualitative analysis and
includes sensitivity testing and a written conclusion.
No portion of the reserve is restricted to any loan or group of loans, and the
entire reserve is available to absorb realized losses. The amount and timing of
realized losses and future reserve allocations may vary from current estimates.
An allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses and ratio of loans in each
category to total loans at December 31, 1992 through 1996 is presented below:
20
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1996 1995 1994
---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------
Loans as a Loans as a Loans as a
Allocation Percent of Allocation Percent of Allocation Percent of
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Total Loans Amount Total Loans Amount Total Loans
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Amount of loan loss reserve:
Commercial and financial $ 15,263 40.3% $ 20,055 50.6% $ 30,962 55.3%
Commercial real estate:
Construction 524 1.5% 495 1.3% 538 1.0%
Developer, investor
and land 2,404 9.3% 4,802 16.3% 8,885 20.8%
Consumer* 11,022 46.7% 8,515 29.6% 6,028 20.9%
Lease financing 541 2.2% 356 2.2% 130 2.0%
Unallocated 9,035 21,806 17,545
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total $ 38,789 100.0% $ 56,029 100.0% $ 64,088 100.0%
========== ===== ========== ===== ========== =====
December 31,
1993 1992
---------------------- ----------------------
Loans as a Loans as a
Allocation Percent of Allocation Percent of
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Total Loans Amount Total Loans
Amount of loan loss reserve:
Commercial and financial $ 38,123 56.3% $ 25,702 57.3%
Commercial real estate:
Construction 1,648 2.6% 1,399 3.4%
Developer, investor
and land 12,426 23.9% 8,453 24.5%
Consumer* 5,470 15.2% 4,762 12.9%
Lease financing 132 2.0% 142 1.9%
Unallocated 6,666 10,020
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total $ 64,465 100.0% $ 50,478 100.0%
========== ===== ========== =====
</TABLE>
* Consumer loans include indirect automobile installment loans, residential
mortgages and home equity lines of credit, credit cards, and check credit loans.
The reserve for possible loan losses was $38.8 million at December 31, 1996, a
decrease of $17.2 million from the $56.0 million a year ago. Net chargeoffs of
$1.7 million in the first quarter of this year were offset with a similar amount
of provision for possible loan losses. In the second quarter the Company
realized $5.1 million in net recoveries on loans previously charged off. This,
along with the Company's risk rating and reserve adequacy indicators and
continued improvement in asset quality, provided a basis to record a $5.5
million credit provision in that quarter. In the third quarter, upon receipt of
final results from the federal and state regulatory agencies annual examination
and following its internal analysis of reserve adequacy, the Company recorded a
$14.6 million credit provision. Also during the third quarter, net recoveries of
$584 thousand were recorded. In the fourth quarter of 1996, net chargeoffs of
$518 thousand and the elimination of the $2.1 million reserve of the sold
banking subsidiary, UST/Conn, decreased the reserve to $38.8 million at year
end.
The $18.6 million credit provision recorded to the reserve for possible loan
losses during the year decreased the unallocated portion of the reserve from
$21.8 million, or 39 percent of the reserve, a year ago to $9.0 million, or 23
percent of the reserve at December 31, 1996. The reserve requirement for the
commercial loan portfolios was reduced $7.2 million due to the combination of
the favorable examination results which confirmed the Company's internal risk
rating indicators and reserve adequacy analysis, and the trend and level of
recoveries. The consumer loan reserve requirement increased $2.5 million due to
the acquisition of residential loans containing no delinquencies from the Branch
Purchase and internal growth in indirect automobile loans and home equity loans.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company's reserve ratios were more closely aligned
with those of comparable institutions, as the reserve was 147 percent of
nonaccruals, 141 percent of total nonperforming assets and 2.1 percent of total
loans.
21
A summary of loan loss experience for the years ended December 31, 1992 through
1996 is presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Reserve for loan losses at beginning of period $ 56,029 $ 64,088 $ 64,465 $ 50,478 $ 50,100
Chargeoffs:
Commercial and financial 3,388 8,823 15,320 29,789 24,012
Commercial real estate:
Construction 511 197 1,705 924
Developer, investor and land 256 16,531 13,483 23,387 10,788
Consumer:
Residential mortgage 256 1,845 897 686 1,250
Home equity 51 403 119 370 673
Indirect automobile installment 1,736 844 806 1,981 2,181
Other consumer 172 117 237 280 3,386
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total chargeoffs 5,859 29,074 31,059 58,198 43,214
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Recoveries:
Commercial and financial 4,875 4,236 4,319 1,628 688
Commercial real estate:
Construction 35 181 32 24 9
Developer, investor and land 3,104 1,799 1,034 928
Consumer:
Residential mortgage 554 982 62 11 36
Home equity 17 46 48 101 66
Indirect automobile installment 707 642 820 1,046 219
Other consumer 31 39 86 20 329
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total recoveries 9,323 7,925 6,401 3,758 1,347
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net (recoveries) chargeoffs (3,464) 21,149 24,658 54,440 41,867
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (18,600) 13,090 24,281 68,427 42,245
Reserve of sold bank (2,104)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Reserve for loan losses at end of period $ 38,789 $ 56,029 $ 64,088 $ 64,465 $ 50,478
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Average loans $1,359,326 $1,265,098 $1,283,464 $1,435,665 $1,584,390
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Ratio of net (recoveries) chargeoffs to average loans (0.3%) 1.7% 1.9% 3.8% 2.6%
</TABLE>
Results of Operations
Comparison of 1996 with 1995
For the year ended December 31, 1996, net income was $32.7 million, or $1.79 per
share, substantially higher than the $15.0 million, or $0.83 per share, earned
in 1995. The 1996 improvement in earnings was largely attributed to a $18.6
million earnings credit recorded through the provision for possible loan losses
compared with a provision of $13.1 million last year, a $6.8 million gain on the
sale of UST/Conn, an increase in lease residual income on maturing equipment
leases, reduced foreclosed asset and workout expense and FDIC insurance
assessment, and a modest improvement in net interest margin. Partially
offsetting these favorable increases were $5.9 million in acquisition-related
charges, a $3.0 million one-time SAIF deposit assessment, and increased salary
and employee benefits expense. This year's earning results produced a return on
average stockholders' investment of 17.66 percent compared with 9.14 percent
last year, and an improvement in return on average assets of 1.58 percent
compared with .81 percent in 1995. A comparative analysis for return on average
assets and return on average stockholders' investment is presented below:
22
Return on Average Assets
Year Ended December 31, 1996 1995
Net interest income 4.65% 5.20%
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (.90) .72
---- ----
Net interest income after provision for possible loan losses 5.55 4.48
Noninterest income 1.80 1.63
Noninterest expense 4.75 4.80
---- ----
Income before income tax 2.60 1.31
Income tax provision 1.02 .50
---- ----
Net income 1.58% .81%
==== ====
Return on Average Stockholders' Investment
Year Ended December 31, 1996 1995
Net interest income 51.97% 58.32%
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (10.06) 8.00
----- -----
Net interest income after provision for possible loan losses 62.03 50.32
Noninterest income 20.16 18.31
Noninterest expense 53.17 53.89
----- -----
Income before income tax 29.02 14.74
Income tax provision 11.36 5.60
----- -----
Net income 17.66% 9.14%
===== =====
Net Interest Income Analysis
The Company's net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis was $96.8
million in 1996, slightly above 1995 of $96.4 million. Actual net interest
income, excluding taxable equivalent basis adjustments, increased $692 thousand,
which exceeded the fully taxable increase due to lower tax-exempt and tax
preference interest income in 1996. This year's modest improvement in net
interest margin reflects the positive effect of earning asset growth slightly
exceeding the negative effect of lower market interest rates in 1996. The
decline in market rates was for the most part limited to the first quarter of
1996 as rates remained relatively level throughout the rest of the year.
The table below presents the following information: average earning assets
(including nonaccrual loans) and average interest-bearing liabilities supporting
earning assets; and interest income and interest expense expressed as a
percentage of the related asset or liability. The average balances and the rates
presented do not include the effect of fair value adjustments under SFAS No.
115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities."
23
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
Average Average Average Average Average Average
(Dollars in thousands) Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate
------- -------- ---- ------- -------- ---- ------- -------- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets
Cash and due from banks $ 83,331 $ 89,490 $ 95,717
Federal funds sold and other 19,388 $ 1,058 5.46% 51,908 $ 3,047 5.87% 24,095 $ 1,197 4.97%
Securities:
Taxable 574,737 34,007 5.92 418,484 25,746 6.15 452,700 27,206 6.01
Non-taxable(1) 4,684 461 9.84 5,097 750 14.71 5,559 557 10.02
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total securities 579,421 34,468 5.95 423,581 26,496 6.26 458,259 27,763 6.06
Loans(1) 1,359,326 122,754 9.03 1,265,098 119,375 9.44 1,283,464 104,322 8.13
Reserve for possible loan
losses (53,233) (63,039) (64,063)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net loans 1,306,093 1,202,059 1,219,401
Other assets 78,671 69,191 83,957
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total assets/interest income $2,066,904 $158,280 $1,836,229 $148,918 $1,881,429 $133,282
========== ======== ========== ======== ========== ========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing $ 355,172 $ 336,931 $ 350,405
NOW 142,565 $ 1,691 1.19% 158,636 $ 2,176 1.37% 163,841 $ 2,343 1.43%
Money market 230,391 7,271 3.16 237,580 6,580 2.77 288,489 6,372 2.21
Regular savings 268,992 6,637 2.47 254,496 7,104 2.79 311,139 7,745 2.49
Time 534,966 29,657 5.54 486,993 26,823 5.51 413,239 16,447 3.98
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total interest-bearing
deposits 1,176,914 45,256 3.85 1,137,705 42,683 3.75 1,176,708 32,907 2.80
---------- ---------- ----------
Total deposits 1,532,086 1,474,636 1,527,113
Short-term borrowings 328,779 16,272 4.95 179,260 9,281 5.18 180,325 6,240 3.46
Other borrowings 6,406 571 8.91 11,790 1,066 9.04
Other liabilities 21,072 12,276 9,945
Stockholders' investment 184,967 163,651 152,256
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders'
investment/interest expense $2,066,904 $ 61,528 $1,836,229 $ 52,535 $1,881,429 $ 40,213
========== ======== ========== ======== ========== =========
Earning assets - interest
income $1,958,135 $158,280 8.08% $1,740,587 $148,918 8.56% $1,765,818 $ 133,282 7.55%
Interest-bearing
liabilities - interest
expense $1,505,693 61,528 4.09% $1,323,371 52,535 3.97% $1,368,823 40,213 2.94%
-------- -------- ---------
Net interest spread(2) 3.99% 4.59% 4.61%
Net interest margin(3) $ 96,752 4.94% $ 96,383 5.54% $ 93,069 5.27%
======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
(1) Interest on loans to and obligations of states and political subdivisions
is not subject to federal income tax. In order to make pretax yields
comparable to taxable loans and investments, a tax equivalent adjustment
is utilized. The adjustment is based on a 35 percent federal income tax
rate in 1996 and 1995, and 34 percent in 1994 and includes applicable
state taxes, net of federal tax benefit.
(2) Net interest spread is the excess of the interest rate on average earning
assets over the interest rate on average interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Net interest margin is the excess of the interest earned over interest
expense divided by average earning assets.
As reflected in the foregoing table, the yield on loans, which was directly
affected by the market rate decline and to a lesser extent by external pressure
on loan pricing, decreased 41 basis points from 9.44 percent in 1995 to 9.03
percent for the year ended December 31, 1996. The yield on securities was also
affected by market interest rates and decreased 31 basis points from 6.26
percent to 5.95 percent this year. The combination of yield declines in loans
and securities and, to a lesser degree, lower federal funds sold yields,
resulted in a decline in yield on total earning assets of 48 basis points from
8.56 percent to 8.08 percent. As exhibited in the following table, the total
effect of lower yields on interest income due to lower earning asset rates was a
$6.7 million decline from 1995.
The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 12 basis points from last
year to 4.09 percent in 1996. Deposit costs, the principal component of
interest-bearing liabilities, have remained relatively stable since the third
quarter of 1995. This year's increase of 10 basis points to 3.85 percent in
deposit costs reflects the carryover effect in 1996 of rising deposit rates
during the first three quarters of 1995. Cost of borrowings, which are almost
entirely short term, decreased during the year consistent with interest rates.
The effect on total interest expense from changes in interest-bearing liability
rates from a year ago was a $298 thousand
24
decrease. The net effect on net interest income from changes in rates on
interest-earning assets and interest- bearing liabilities was a decrease of $6.4
million.
Reflecting the decline in earning asset yield and a modest increase in liability
costs, the interest margin and spread decreased from 5.54 percent and 4.59
percent, respectively, last year to 4.94 percent and 3.99 percent this year.
Since reaching a historical peak in the first quarter of 1995, both net interest
margin and rate spread have been on a decline in concert with market interest
rates and some pressure on loan pricing. Excluding the possible effects of
future market interest rate changes, some continued narrowing of margin and
spread is expected as the full impact of the Branch Purchase and Walden
acquisition are included in operating results. Net interest income, however,
will benefit favorably from both transactions.
Average earning assets for the year were $1.958 billion, $218 million higher
than 1995. Average securities volume was up $156 million to $579 million for the
year while average loans outstanding increased $94 million to $1.359 billion.
When combined with reduced federal funds sold volume, total interest income
increased $16.1 million from 1995 due to changes in earning asset volume.
Funding for the higher loan and securities volume was provided through an
increase in average borrowings of $143 million to $329 million and deposit
growth of $57 million which was principally higher cost certificates of deposit.
In the aggregate, interest-bearing liabilities increased $182 million in 1996 to
$1.506 billion. Such increase added $9.3 million in volume-related interest
expense over 1995. The net effect on net interest income from changes in volume
of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities was an increase of
$6.8 million.
The following table attributes changes in interest income and interest expense
to changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 1996
when compared with the year ended December 31, 1995. Changes attributable to
both rate and volume are allocated on a weighted basis.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Increase (Decrease) From Year Ended December 31, 1995
Year Ended Amount Due to Changes in
(Dollars in thousands) December 31, 1996 Total Change Volume Rate
----------------- ------------ ------ ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans* $ 122,754 $ 3,379 $ 8,649 $ (5,270)
Interest on securities:
Taxable 34,007 8,261 9,280 (1,019)
Non-taxable* 461 (289) (57) (232)
Interest on federal funds sold and other 1,058 (1,989) (1,788) (201)
------------ ----------- ------------ ----------
Total interest income* 158,280 9,362 16,084 (6,722)
------------ ----------- ------------ ----------
Interest expense:
Interest on NOW, money market and regular savings deposits 15,599 (261) (213) (48)
Interest on time deposits 29,657 2,834 2,658 176
Interest on short-term borrowings 16,272 6,991 7,417 (426)
Interest on other borrowings (571) (571)
------------ ----------- ------------ ----------
Total interest expense 61,528 8,993 9,291 (298)
------------ ----------- ------------ ----------
Net interest income $ 96,752 $ 369 $ 6,793 $ (6,424)
============ =========== ============ ==========
</TABLE>
* Fully taxable equivalent at the federal income tax rate of 35 percent and
includes applicable state taxes net of federal benefit. The tax equivalent
adjustment on loans was approximately $500 thousand and on non-taxable
securities was approximately $100 thousand.
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income was $37.3 million, $7.3 million higher than 1995.
Included in this year's non- interest income was a $6.8 million gain on the sale
of UST/Conn. Refer to Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for a further discussion. Corporate services income, which includes merchant
credit card income, increased 15 percent, or $1.3 million to $9.8 million.
Income recorded on maturing equipment leases increased $700 thousand to $1.4
million. Asset management fees decreased $707 thousand due to a lower level of
assets under management and net realized securities gains were $689 thousand
lower than 1995.
Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expense was $98.3 million, an increase of $10.2 million over
last year. The largest component of the increase was a $5.1 million provision
for acquisition expenses related to the Branch Purchase and a $793 thousand
charge for expense related to the 1997 Walden acquisition for a total of $5.9
million in acquisition charge expense. Refer to Note 11 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of acquisition
charges. Salary and employee benefits increased $3.7 million reflecting
additional staffing in retail banking, computer operations and processing to
support the addition
25
of 20 banking branches acquired in the Branch Purchase. Also included in 1996
benefit expense was a one-time $830 thousand provision for the remaining
obligation to fund a UST/Conn Directors' pension plan stemming from the
contractual provisions of the sale of this subsidiary. Credit card processing
expense increased $948 thousand consistent with the increase in merchant credit
card income described above. The deposit insurance assessment was $4.0 million
in 1996 and includes a one-time $3.0 million Savings Association Insurance Fund
assessment on former savings and loan association deposits held by a Company
subsidiary bank, USTrust. Refer to Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of the deposit
insurance assessment. Other noninterest expense, described below, increased $3.0
million to $25.9 million. Partially offsetting the aforementioned increases in
expense was a sharp decrease from 1995 in foreclosed asset and workout expense
of $4.2 million to $1.6 million this year, a direct benefit of the Company's
successful effort in the reduction of problem assets over the past few years.
Other noninterest expense increased from $23.0 million last year to $25.9
million this year. Furniture and equipment expense increased $592 thousand due
to increased maintenance and depreciation expense on the Company's investment in
new computer-related equipment and software. The increase in legal and
consulting of $638 thousand was largely driven by the growth in home equity and
indirect automobile loans and associated legal costs for new loan closings and
collection activities. In addition, a $243 thousand nonrecurring charge for
severance-related consulting services of a former Company executive was recorded
during the year. Advertising and promotion increased $744 thousand as a result
of several successful promotional campaigns during the year for new loan
products and deposit services as well as to increase the presence and awareness
of the Company's subsidiary bank, USTrust among the constituents of its market
area. This year's amortization of intangible expense includes one month, or $534
thousand of amortization of core deposit intangibles related to the Branch
Purchase. All other noninterest expense increased $2.5 million to $12.5 million.
Included this year was $870 thousand in litigation provisions recorded for
certain litigation matters that required accounting recognition, higher costs
associated with the increased volume of consumer loans, and other miscellaneous
operating costs. Slightly offsetting the aforementioned increases in other
noninterest expense was the absence this year of $1.9 million facility
consolidation provisions recorded last year in connection with space
consolidation, including the write-off of leases and leasehold improvements on
abandoned facilities.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Furniture and equipment depreciation and maintenance $ 4,164 $ 3,572
Legal and consulting 2,994 2,356
Advertising and promotion 2,867 2,123
Amortization of intangibles 1,703 1,798
Service bureau and other data processing 1,657 1,274
Facility consolidation provisions 84 1,895
All other 12,463 9,951
-------- --------
Total other noninterest expense $ 25,932 $ 22,969
======== ========
</TABLE>
It is expected that noninterest expense, excluding one-time items, will increase
substantially next year as the full year's effect of the Branch Purchase
overhead expenses are included. In addition, the Company expects to record a
one-time, pre-tax restructuring charge in 1997 of approximately $13.5 million in
connection with the Walden acquisition.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income taxes of $21.0 million in 1996 compared with $9.2
million in 1995. The increase is the direct result of the significantly higher
level of pre-tax income recorded this year. Refer to Note 12 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of
income taxes.
As of December 31, 1996, included in other assets was a deferred tax asset of
approximately $5.0 million, which is expected to be realized against future
taxable income. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the
Company will realize the benefit of these deferred assets.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The methods and assumptions used by the Company to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, in
accordance with SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments," are discussed in Note 18 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
26
of this Form 10-K. Financial instruments do not include all of the assets and
liabilities recorded on a company's balance sheet. Therefore, the aggregate fair
value amounts of the financial instruments do not represent the underlying value
of a company.
As a result of those assumptions and valuation methodologies, the estimated fair
value of Financial Instrument assets and liabilities of the Company as of
December 31, 1996 was $2.56 billion and $2.45 billion, or $27 million and $1
million in excess of carrying value, respectively. The estimated fair value of
Financial Instrument assets and liabilities as of December 31, 1995 was $1.91
billion and $1.76 billion, or $43 million and $4 million in excess of carrying
value, respectively. The decrease in excess of fair value over the carrying
value of Financial Instrument assets of $16 million is attributed, in the
opinion of management, to the $17 million decrease in reserve for possible loan
losses partially offset by the improvement in credit quality of the commercial
loan portfolios and resulting reduction in credit risk. The small decrease in
excess of fair value over carrying value of Financial Instrument liabilities, is
attributed, in the opinion of management, to the rollover of older certificates
of deposit at the current higher rates.
Comparison of 1995 with 1994
Net Interest Income Analysis
The Company's 1995 net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis was
$96.4 million, $3.3 million higher than the $93.1 million in 1994. The increase
reflects the positive effect on net interest income of a higher level of
interest rates in 1995 compared with 1994. The average interest rate spread was
relatively level with 1994 while the average interest rate margin was higher.
Partially offsetting the effect of a stronger interest rate margin was a decline
in the volume of earning assets, particularly loans, and a shift by deposit
customers from savings products to higher cost certificates of deposit during
1995.
Interest rates moved downward in the second half of 1995 following a period of
rapid interest rate rise from early 1994 through the first quarter of 1995. The
result of 1995's higher level of interest rates was an improvement in yield on
earning assets of 101 basis points from 7.55 percent in 1994 to 8.56 percent in
1995. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities, principally deposits, increased
by 103 basis points from 2.94 percent in 1994 to 3.97 percent in 1995. Yields on
prime-based loans and federal funds sold, which reprice daily, reached their
peak in the first quarter of 1995 and decreased steadily throughout the
remainder of the year consistent with the movement of interest rates.
While the Company initially refrained from increasing deposit rates in the
rising interest rate environment of 1994, to satisfy liquidity needs and in
response to competition for deposits, a more aggressive deposit pricing was
adopted in late 1994 and the first quarter of 1995. Beginning with the second
quarter and continuing through the rest of 1995, the Company moved to a less
competitive pricing policy. The result was a rising cost of deposits in early
1995 which subsided during the latter half of the year.
The interest rate spread in 1995 of 4.59 percent was approximately equal with
the 1994 spread of 4.61 percent as the rise in yield on earning assets equaled
the increase in cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest rate
margin improved 27 basis points to 5.54 percent reflecting the positive impact
of an equal rise in rates on the larger balance of average earning assets which
totaled $1.74 billion compared with interest-bearing liabilities which totaled
$1.32 billion. Also contributing to the increased net interest rate margin was a
reduction in interest-bearing liabilities of $45 million which exceeded a
decrease in interest-earning assets by $20 million. The net effect on net
interest income from changes in rates in 1995 compared with 1994 was an increase
of $5.5 million.
Average earning assets decreased $25 million from $1.77 billion in 1994 to $1.74
billion in 1995. The decrease reflects declines in average loans of $18 million
and securities of $35 million which was partially offset by an increase in lower
yielding federal funds sold of $28 million. Average interest-bearing liabilities
decreased $45 million from 1994 to $1.32 billion in 1995. In addition,
interest-bearing liabilities experienced a shift in the mix of average deposits
from savings and money market deposits to higher cost certificates of deposit.
Regular savings, NOW and money market deposits decreased $113 million while time
deposits increased $74 million. The net effect on net interest income from
changes in volume of loans, deposits and other interest-bearing balances in 1995
compared with 1994 was a decrease of $2.2 million.
The following table attributes changes in interest income and interest expense
to changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 1995
when compared with the year ended December 31, 1994. Changes attributable to
both rate and volume are allocated on a weighted basis.
27
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Increase (Decrease) From Year Ended December 31, 1994
Year Ended Amount Due to Changes in
(Dollars in thousands) December 31, 1995 Total Change Volume Rate
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans* $ 119,375 $ 15,053 $ (1,512) $ 16,565
Interest on securities:
Taxable 25,746 (1,460) (2,093) 633
Non-taxable* 750 193 (50) 243
Interest on federal funds sold and other 3,047 1,850 1,599 251
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest income* 148,918 15,636 (2,056) 17,692
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Interest expense:
Interest on NOW, money market and
regular savings deposits 15,860 (600) (2,599) 1,999
Interest on time deposits 26,823 10,376 3,293 7,083
Interest on short-term borrowings 9,281 3,041 (37) 3,078
Interest on other borrowings 571 (495) (480) (15)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest expense 52,535 12,322 177 12,145
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net interest income $ 96,383 $ 3,314 $ (2,233) $ 5,547
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
* Fully taxable equivalent at the federal income tax rate of 35 percent and
includes applicable state taxes net of federal benefit. The tax equivalent
adjustment on loans was approximately $700 thousand and on non-taxable
securities was approximately $200 thousand.
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income was $30.0 million in 1995, a slight decrease of $.3
million from 1994. Asset management fees decreased $1.1 million due to timing
differences in the recognition of fee income in 1994 and a slight decrease in
the level of assets under management in 1995 compared to 1994. Offsetting the
lower asset management fees were increases in corporate services income,
residual income on maturing equipment leases and higher realized gains from the
sale of primarily equity securities held by a investment company subsidiary.
Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expense was reduced $3.2 million in 1995 to $88.2 million
compared to 1994 due largely to decreases in foreclosed asset and workout
expense and deposit insurance assessments. The lower level of problem assets in
1995 resulted in a $3.0 million decrease in foreclosed asset and workout
expense. Deposit insurance assessments decreased $1.5 million in 1995 due to the
reduction in insurance premium rates by the FDIC.
Salary and employee benefits increased $1.6 million in 1995 to $44.3 million.
The increase was largely due to a full-year of asset management revenue-sharing
provisions in 1995 compared with only a half-year provision in 1994. Refer to
the paragraph below for a further discussion of the revenue-sharing provisions.
Included in salary and employee benefits was $.7 million and $1.0 million in
expenses related to severance agreements for 1995 and 1994, respectively.
In late 1994 and early 1995, the Company and senior executives of USTC's Asset
Management Division negotiated and entered into employment agreements designed
to maximize the profitability and grow the assets under management of the asset
management business. The agreements are designed to increase the foregoing
executives' participation in the value created in the asset management business
and, in a change-in-control situation, increase the likelihood that a
prospective purchaser will retain the services of the executives. Certain
provisions of the agreements became effective July 1, 1994, and contain
revenue-sharing provisions which permit the Asset Management Division to use a
specified percentage of its base revenues for the payment of expenses of the
operation, including incentive compensation.
Other noninterest expense was reduced $.6 million in 1995 to $23.0 million.
Included in other noninterest expense were provisions recorded in connection
with space consolidation, including the writedown to market value of Company
facilities offered for sale and the writeoff of leases on abandoned facilities,
lease subsidies and leasehold improvements. The facility consolidation
provisions were $1.9 million in 1995 compared with $.5 million in 1994. In
addition, the Company in 1995 accelerated the amortization of certain core
deposit intangible assets after conducting a review of the expected future
economic benefits derived from these assets and their current carrying amount.
The amount of accelerated amortization expense recorded in 1995 was $.6 million.
This resulted in an increase in amortization of intangible asset expense of $.4
million compared with 1994. Excluding such special items, other noninterest
expense was reduced over 10 percent, or $2.6 million, in 1995. The largest
reductions were in legal and consulting $1.2 million and
28
all other noninterest expense of $1.2 million. The decrease in all other
noninterest expense was due to reductions across numerous expense categories,
the largest were declines in appraisal fees, litigation expense and audit fees.
The major components of other noninterest expense were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
Furniture and equipment depreciation and maintenance $ 3,572 $ 3,476
Legal and consulting 2,356 3,553
Advertising and promotion 2,123 2,307
Facility consolidation provisions 1,895 480
Amortization of intangibles 1,798 1,367
Service bureau and other data processing 1,274 1,173
All other 9,951 11,171
-------- --------
Total other noninterest expense $ 22,969 $ 23,527
======== ========
</TABLE>
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Information
The preceding discussion and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this
Form 10-K contain certain forward-looking statements, including without
limitation the statements regarding (i) the Walden acquisition and associated
amounts and timing of certain restructuring charges and effect on future
operating results; and (ii) the full-year effect on operating results from the
Branch Purchase; and (iii) the Company's expectations regarding the ability of
its principal banking subsidiary USTrust in meeting the bank's regulatory
capital conditions and requirements. Moreover, the Company may from time to
time, in both written reports and oral statements by Company management, express
its expectations regarding future performance of the Company and estimates of
the effects of its acquisition activities. These forward-looking statements are
inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ from Company expectations.
Risk factors that could impact current and future performance include but are
not limited to: (i) changes in asset quality and the resulting credit
risk-related losses and expense; (ii) adverse changes in the economy of the New
England region, the Company's primary market, which could further accentuate
credit-related losses and expenses; (iii) since most of the Company's loans are
concentrated in Eastern Massachusetts and a substantial portion of these loans
have real estate as primary and secondary collateral, adverse changes in the
local real estate market can also negatively affect credit risk; (iv) the
Company operates in an increasingly competitive New England financial services
marketplace, where a large number of bank acquisitions and mergers has resulted
in fewer but much larger and financially stronger competitors which could alter
Company expectations; (v) fluctuations in market rates and prices can negatively
affect net interest margin, asset valuations and expense expectations; and (vi)
as a bank-holding company, the Company and its subsidiary banks are subject to
changing regulatory requirements of federal and state agencies that could
materially impact future operations of the Company.
29
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Material.
Index to Financial Statements
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Financial Statements Page
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants 31
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1996 and 1995 32
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 33
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Investment for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 34
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 35
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 36
</TABLE>
30
Report of Independent Public Accountants
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of UST Corp.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of UST Corp. (a
Massachusetts corporation) and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995,
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
investment and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of UST Corp. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 31, 1997
31
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Cash, due from banks and interest-bearing deposits (Note 3) $ 111,532 $ 89,799
Federal funds sold 127,469
Securities available-for-sale (Notes 1 and 4):
Mortgage-backed securities 216,978 246,521
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies and other securities 311,196 329,152
---------- ----------
Total securities available-for-sale 528,174 575,673
Loans (Notes 5, 14, and 16):
Loans - net of unearned discount of $18,444 in 1996 and $33,419 in 1995 1,848,142 1,272,077
Reserve for possible loan losses (38,789) (56,029)
---------- ----------
Total loans, net 1,809,353 1,216,048
Premises, furniture and equipment, net (Note 6) 41,512 31,840
Other real estate owned, net (Notes 1 and 7) 688 3,015
Loans held-for-sale (Note 1) 102 13,098
Intangible assets, net (Note 1) 53,878 4,650
Other assets (Notes 9 and 12) 33,906 34,965
---------- ----------
Total Assets $2,706,614 $1,969,088
========== ==========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing $ 540,014 $ 372,917
Interest-bearing:
NOW 259,265 166,011
Money market 243,749 210,924
Regular savings 457,769 244,680
Time:
Certificates of deposit over $100 thousand 118,862 112,426
Other time 486,207 405,779
---------- ----------
Total deposits 2,105,866 1,512,737
Short-term and other borrowings (Note 8) 348,066 243,105
Other liabilities (Note 9) 54,722 39,578
---------- ----------
Total liabilities 2,508,654 1,795,420
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 15 and 16)
Stockholders' investment (Notes 1, 10, and 13):
Preferred stock $1 par value; Authorized - 4,000,000 shares;
Outstanding - None
Common stock $.625 par value; Authorized - 45,000,000 shares;
Outstanding - 18,018,623 and 17,843,582 shares in 1996 and
1995, respectively 11,262 11,152
Additional paid-in capital 75,710 74,158
Retained earnings 112,975 87,253
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax (2,453) 961
Deferred compensation and other 466 144
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' investment 197,960 173,668
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment $2,706,614 $1,969,088
========== ==========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
32
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated Statements of Income
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans $ 122,279 $ 118,666 $ 103,526
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable 34,007 25,746 27,206
Non-taxable 310 510 383
Interest on federal funds sold and other 1,058 3,047 1,197
----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest income 157,654 147,969 132,312
----------- ----------- -----------
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits 45,256 42,683 32,907
Interest on borrowings 16,272 9,852 7,306
----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest expense 61,528 52,535 40,213
----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income 96,126 95,434 92,099
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (Note 5) (18,600) 13,090 24,281
----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income after provision for possible loan losses 114,726 82,344 67,818
----------- ----------- -----------
Noninterest income:
Asset management fees 12,569 13,276 14,419
Corporate services income 9,827 8,529 8,198
Gain on sale of bank subsidiary (Note 2) 6,806
Service charges on deposit accounts 4,422 4,637 4,893
Lease residual income 1,382 682 362
Securities gains, net (Note 4) 1,113 1,802 1,105
Other 1,169 1,044 1,357
----------- ----------- -----------
Total noninterest income 37,288 29,970 30,334
----------- ----------- -----------
Noninterest expense:
Salary and employee benefits (Note 9) 48,009 44,287 42,650
Net occupancy expense 7,571 7,672 7,837
Acquisition charges (Note 11) 5,933
Credit card processing expense 5,356 4,408 3,955
Deposit insurance assessment (Note 11) 3,954 3,067 4,566
Foreclosed asset and workout expense (Note 7) 1,583 5,784 8,820
Other (Note 11) 25,932 22,969 23,527
----------- ----------- -----------
Total noninterest expense 98,338 88,187 91,355
----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes 53,676 24,127 6,797
Income tax provision (Note 12) 21,014 9,169 2,051
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income $ 32,662 $ 14,958 $ 4,746
=========== =========== ===========
Per share data:
Net income $ 1.79 $ .83 $ .27
Cash dividends declared $ .29 $ .05
Weighted average number of common shares (Note 10) 18,227,036 18,068,203 17,780,032
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
33
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Investment
Additional Unrealized Deferred
Common Paid-in Retained Gain/(Loss) Treasury Compensation
(Dollars in thousands) Stock Capital Earnings on Securities Stock and Other Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance December 31, 1993 $10,815 $69,694 $68,437 $ 3,335 $ 538 $152,819
Net income 4,746 4,746
Stock option exercises and
stock issued under restricted stock
plan (Notes 9 and 10) 162 2,108 (664) 1,606
Change from net unrealized gain
to loss on securities available-for-sale,
net of tax (Note 1) (26,936) (26,936)
Reduction in ESOP loan guarantee 322 322
Activity in Directors Deferred
Compensation Program and other, net (Note 10) 32 327 (282) 77
------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Balance December 31, 1994 11,009 72,129 73,183 (23,601) (86) 132,634
Net income 14,958 14,958
Cash dividends declared (888) (888)
Stock option exercises and
stock issued under restricted stock
plan (Notes 9 and 10) 139 1,987 (171) 1,955
Change from net unrealized loss
to gain on securities available-for-sale,
net of tax (Note 1) 24,562 24,562
Reduction in ESOP loan guarantee 321 321
Activity in Directors Deferred
Compensation Program and other, net (Note 10) 4 42 80 126
------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Balance December 31, 1995 11,152 74,158 87,253 961 144 173,668
Net income 32,662 32,662
Cash dividends declared (5,202) (5,202)
Treasury stock acquired (Note 13) $(3,363) (3,363)
Stock option exercises and
stock issued under restricted stock
plan (Notes 9, 10 and 13) 94 1,367 (1,738) 3,221 2,944
Change from net unrealized gain
to loss on securities available-for-sale,
net of tax (Note 1) (3,414) (3,414)
Reduction in ESOP loan guarantee 143 143
Activity in Directors Deferred
Compensation Program and other, net (Note 10) 16 185 142 179 522
------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Balance December 31, 1996 $11,262 $75,710 $112,975 $(2,453) $ - $ 466 $197,960
======= ======= ======== ======= ======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
34
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 32,662 $ 14,958 $ 4,746
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (18,600) 13,090 24,281
Depreciation and amortization 5,541 5,244 5,295
Amortization of gain on sale/leaseback (372) (384)
(Accretion) amortization of securities discount or premium, net (140) 481 732
Gain on sale of bank subsidiary (6,806)
Securities gains, net (1,113) (1,802) (1,105)
Gain on sale of other real estate owned, net (558) (450) (384)
Writedowns of other real estate owned 496 2,035 2,360
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 3,312 (1,558) 7,134
(Increase) decrease in other assets (6,220) (15,415) 8,717
Increase in other liabilities 15,605 29,083 4,432
--------- --------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 24,179 45,294 55,824
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale 30,394 56,019 61,669
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale 140,986 25,599 196,943
Purchases of securities available-for-sale (145,941) (223,026) (144,794)
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity (100)
Net (increase) decrease in federal funds sold (142,069) 10,000 11,000
Net (increase) decrease in loans (137,067) (21,689) 37,735
Proceeds from other real estate owned 5,619 10,503 8,753
Proceeds from loans held-for-sale 12,996
Purchases of premises and equipment (5,885) (2,884) (3,670)
Net cash proceeds from sale of bank subsidiary (Note 2) 11,989
Net cash acquired from Branch Purchase (Note 2) 176,862
--------- --------- --------
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities (52,116) (145,478) 167,536
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in nontime deposits 42,024 (102,866) (91,940)
Net (decrease) increase in certificates of deposit (20,325) 124,797 (58,052)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term and other borrowings 32,299 74,473 (71,279)
Cash dividends paid (3,760) (888)
Treasury stock acquired (3,363)
Issuance of common stock for cash, net 2,795 1,388 792
--------- --------- --------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 49,670 96,904 (220,479)
--------- --------- --------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 21,733 (3,280) 2,881
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 89,799 93,079 90,198
--------- --------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 111,532 $ 89,799 $ 93,079
========= ========= ========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ 61,057 $ 51,730 $ 39,853
========= ========= ========
Income taxes $ 17,606 $ 7,768 $ 2,204
========= ========= ========
Noncash transactions (Note 2):
Transfers from securities held-to-maturity to securities available-for-sale $ 100
=========
Transfers from other assets to securities available-for-sale $ 4,180 $ 499 $ 300
========= ========= ========
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned $ 5,200 $ 6,175 $ 24,872
========= ========= ========
Transfers from loans to loans held-for-sale, net $ 13,098
=========
Financed other real estate owned sales $ 550 $ 565 $ 14,732
========= ========= ========
Common stock issuance $ 492 $ 784 $ 1,837
========= ========= ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
35
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
(1) Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
UST Corp. is a bank holding company with two banking subsidiaries: USTrust and
United States Trust Company ("USTC"), each headquartered in Boston,
Massachusetts. UST Corp. and its banking and nonbanking subsidiaries (the
"Company") is engaged in a single line of business, that of providing a broad
range of financial services principally to individuals and small- and
medium-sized companies in the New England region. Included in these services are
commercial banking, consumer services, trust and money management, and equipment
leasing. The Company through its banking subsidiaries operates 48 banking
branches in the greater Boston area.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with generally
accepted accounting principles and general practice in the banking industry. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reporting and disclosure of assets and liabilities, including
those that are of a contingent nature, at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. The significant accounting and
reporting policies of the Company are summarized below.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of UST Corp. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. The parent company only financial statements contained in
Note 17 reflect investments in subsidiaries using the equity method of
accounting.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform with
the current year presentation. Assets owned by others and held in a fiduciary or
agency capacity are not included in the consolidated balance sheets.
Securities
The Company classifies investments in debt and equity securities in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 ("SFAS No. 115"),
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." This
Statement addresses the accounting and reporting for investments in equity
securities that have readily determinable fair values and for all investments in
debt securities. Under this statement such securities are classified as
held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale.
Securities Held-to-Maturity - Debt securities which management has the positive
intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity, and
are carried at cost adjusted for the amortization of premium or the accretion of
discount. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, there were no securities classified by
the Company as held-to-maturity.
Trading Securities - Debt and equity securities with readily determinable market
values that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in
the near term are classified as trading securities and are carried at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings. At
December 31, 1996 and 1995, there were no securities classified by the Company
as trading.
Securities Available-for-Sale - Debt and equity securities not classified as
either held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale and
carried at fair value, with unrealized after-tax gains and losses reported as a
separate component of stockholders' investment. At December 31, 1996,
stockholders' investment was decreased by an unrealized loss related to SFAS No.
115 of $2.5 million net of a deferred tax benefit of $1.8 million.
For mortgage-backed securities, the Company recalculates the effective yield on
the investment to reflect the actual prepayment results and estimated future
prepayments. The net investment in these securities is adjusted to the amount
that would have existed had the new estimated average life and effective yield
been applied since the acquisition of the securities. Such adjustments are
charged or credited to interest income in the current period.
The Company determines the securities sold by the specific identification
method. The amount of taxes paid on gains is dependent upon the overall results
of operations of the subsidiary realizing the gain.
36
Premises, Furniture and Equipment
Premises, furniture and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. The Company provides for depreciation using the
straight-line method by charges to expense in amounts estimated to amortize the
cost over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:
Buildings and building improvements 10-40 years
Computer equipment 5 years
All other furniture and equipment 3-10 years
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease agreements plus
one renewal period.
Loans and Leases
Loans are stated at their principal amount net of unearned discount, if any.
Certain loans are made on a discounted basis. The unearned discount applicable
to such loans is recorded as income monthly by use of the actuarial method.
Interest income on nondiscounted loans is accrued based on the principal amount
of loans outstanding.
Loans and leases are placed on nonaccrual, with the reversal of all uncollected
accrued interest, when there is doubt as to the collectibility of interest or
principal or if loans or leases are 90 days or more past due unless they are
both well secured and in the process of collection. In every case, a loan or
lease reaching 180 days past due is placed on nonaccrual. Interest received on
nonaccrual loans and leases is applied to principal if collection of principal
is doubtful; otherwise, it is reflected in interest income on a cash basis.
Restructured loans are those on which concessions in terms have been granted as
a result of deterioration of a borrower's financial condition. Interest on these
loans is accrued at the new terms.
The Company adopted on January 1, 1995, SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan," as amended by SFAS No. 118. Under this Statement,
commercial and commercial real estate loans that are recognized by the Company
as nonaccrual and restructured are classified as "impaired loans" by the
Company. Consumer loans and leases recognized as nonaccrual are excluded from
impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114. Loan impairment is measured
based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the
loan's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan's
observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent.
Reserve for Possible Loan Losses
The reserve for possible loan losses is maintained at a level considered
adequate by management to provide for possible losses from loans and leases.
Adequacy of the reserve is determined by management using a consistent,
systematic methodology which analyzes the size and risk of the loan and lease
portfolio on a monthly basis. Factors in this analysis include historical loss
experience and asset quality, as reflected by delinquency trends, nonaccrual and
restructured loans and the Company's credit risk rating profile. Consideration
is also given to the current and expected economic conditions and, in
particular, how such conditions affect the types of credits in the portfolio and
the market area in general. This analysis is documented using a combination of
numerical and qualitative analysis and includes sensitivity testing and a
written conclusion. The reserve is based on estimates, and ultimate losses may
vary from current estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically and, as
adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the current
period.
When a loan, classified as impaired or otherwise, or a lease, or portion
thereof, is considered uncollectible, it is charged against the reserve.
Recoveries on amounts previously charged off are added to the reserve when
collected. Amounts are charged off once the probability of loss has been
established given consideration to such factors as level of collateral and
guarantees, prospective economic conditions and financial strength of the
customer.
Loans Held-For-Sale
In 1995, the Company transferred certain loans to an accelerated disposition
portfolio, "Loans held-for-sale." Such loans were transferred at their estimated
disposition values less estimated cost of disposal. The excess, if any, of the
loan balance over the determined value was charged to the reserve for possible
loan losses upon transfer.
37
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned ("OREO") includes properties which the Company acquired
through foreclosure or in settlement of loans. All OREO is held for sale and
carried at the lower of the loan value or fair value of the property acquired,
less estimated costs to sell ("net realizable value"). At the time of
foreclosure, the excess, if any, of the loan value over the net realizable
value, is charged to the reserve for possible loan losses. The carrying value of
OREO is reviewed periodically. Subsequent declines in the fair value of the
property and net operating results of the property are charged to "Foreclosed
asset and workout expense."
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income
tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or
liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or
rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the
income tax provision.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of
common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding. Common stock equivalents
consist primarily of dilutive outstanding stock options computed under the
treasury stock method. Average dilutive common stock equivalents were 343,314,
382,206 and 379,059 for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include goodwill and core deposit intangibles which are stated
at cost less accumulated amortization. Cost of purchased businesses in excess of
net assets acquired ("goodwill") includes amounts being amortized over twenty-
and forty-year periods. Values assigned to deposits of purchased businesses
("core deposit intangibles") are being amortized over seven- and fifteen-year
periods using an accelerated method.
On a periodic basis, the Company reviews its goodwill and core deposit
intangible assets for events or changes in circumstances that may indicate that
the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable, and, if appropriate,
reduces the carrying amount through a charge to income. Goodwill, net of
accumulated amortization, totaled $2.4 million and $2.0 million at December 31,
1996 and 1995, respectively. Core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated
amortization, totaled $51.4 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively. The increase in both intangible asset categories during 1996
was related to the purchase of twenty banking branches. The allocation of the
purchase price to intangible assets from the branch acquisition is subject to
the completion of certain appraisals of the assets acquired. Refer to Note 2 for
a further discussion.
Statements of Cash Flows
For the purpose of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash
on hand, amounts due from banks and interest-bearing deposits.
Recent Accounting Developments
As of January 1, 1996, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of."
This Statement requires a review for impairment of long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not
be recoverable. An impairment would be estimated if the sum of the expected
future cash flows to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset
is less than the carrying amount of the asset. This Statement does not apply to
financial instruments, core deposit intangibles, mortgage and other servicing
rights, or deferred tax assets. The adoption of this Statement did not have any
impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Also on January 1, 1996, the Company adopted SFAS No. 122, "Accounting for
Mortgage Servicing Rights." This Statement amends certain provisions of SFAS No.
65, "Accounting for Mortgage Banking Activities," prohibiting the capitalization
of mortgage loan servicing rights acquired through loan origination activities,
by requiring that both originated and purchased mortgage loan servicing rights
be capitalized. In addition, SFAS No. 122 requires all capitalized mortgage loan
servicing rights be evaluated for impairment based on their fair values. The
adoption of this Statement did not have any impact on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," which establishes a fair value-based method of accounting for
stock options and similar equity instruments of
38
employee stock compensation plans. This Statement allows the option of adopting
the new fair value method or to continue to measure compensation cost for the
those plans using the current intrinsic value-based method as prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees," ("APB Opinion No. 25"). Under this Statement, the continued use of
the intrinsic value-based method, requires pro forma disclosure of net income
and earnings per share as if the fair value-based method had been applied. The
Statement was adopted by the Company on January 1, 1996. The Company, however,
continues to use the intrinsic value-based method under the provisions of APB
Opinion No. 25 and has disclosed the pro forma information in Note 10.
In June 1996, the FASB issued SFAS No. 125 as amended by SFAS No. 127,
"Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities." This Statement provides accounting and reporting standards for
transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities.
The standards are based on consistent application of a financial components
approach that focuses on control. After a transfer of financial assets, an
entity recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the
liabilities it has incurred, derecognizes financial assets when control has been
surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when extinguished. This Statement
provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets
that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings. This Statement is
effective for transactions occurring after December 31, 1996, and is to be
applied prospectively. This Statement is not expected to have a material impact
on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
On March 3, 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." This
Statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 15 regarding the presentation of earnings
per share ("EPS") on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 128 replaces the
presentation of Primary EPS with a Basic EPS calculation that excludes the
dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. The Statement requires a dual
presentation of Basic and Diluted EPS, which is computed similarly to Fully
Diluted EPS pursuant to APB Opinion No. 15, for all entities with complex
capital structures. This Statement is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 1997 and requires restatement of all prior-period EPS data
presented. The Statement is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's earnings per share presentation.
(2) Acquisitions and Divestitures
Branch Purchase
In June 1996, the Company's principal banking subsidiary, USTrust, entered into
a definitive agreement with the First National Bank of Boston ("FNBB") and its
parent company, Bank of Boston Corporation, under which USTrust would purchase
twenty banking branches ("the Branch Purchase") of FNBB and BayBank, N.A.
("BayBank"). The transaction included the assumption of approximately $149
million in noninterest-bearing deposits, $378 million in savings deposits, $140
million of certificates of deposit, $77 million of repurchase agreements, $8
million in premises and equipment, and $508 million in commercial, residential
real estate, and other loans with businesses and consumers. USTrust paid a
premium equal to 7 percent of average deposit liabilities assumed or
approximately $49 million. The allocation of purchase price is subject to the
completion of certain appraisals of assets acquired. The transaction received
bank regulatory approval under the condition that USTrust have a Tier 1 leverage
capital ratio of not less than (i) 4.8 percent, no later than ten days after
consummation of the acquisition of sixteen BayBank branches; and (ii) 5 percent,
no later than three months after consummation of the acquisition of the BayBank
branches and for a period of six months thereafter. At December 31, 1996,
USTrust's Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 5.77 percent.
UST Bank/Connecticut
On November 29, 1996, the Company completed the sale of its Connecticut banking
subsidiary, UST Bank/Connecticut ("UST/Conn"), to Lafayette American Bank and
Trust company, a subsidiary of HUBCO, Inc., a New Jersey-based bank holding
company. Under the terms of the transaction, the Company received cash of $13
million representing UST/Conn's capital plus a deposit premium of 7 percent. As
a result, the Company recorded a $6.8 million gain on the sale in noninterest
income. The positive effect on capital from the gain and cash proceeds received
in the sale transaction provided the Company with the necessary funds to
contribute capital to USTrust to facilitate the aforementioned Branch Purchase.
At the time of the sale, UST/Conn had total assets, of $107 million, including
loans of $70 million, securities of $22 million, federal funds sold of $15
million, premises and equipment of $.5 million, and other real estate owned of
$.1 million. Liabilities totaled $101 million and included noninterest-bearing
deposits of $22 million, $41 million in savings deposits, certificates of
deposit of $32 million and $4 million in other borrowings.
39
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
Walden Bancorp, Inc.
Subsequent to December 31, 1996, on January 3, 1997, the Company completed its
acquisition of Walden Bancorp, Inc. ("Walden"), a multi-bank holding company
headquartered in Acton, Massachusetts. The transaction was accounted for as a
pooling of interests and was structured as a tax-free exchange of 1.9 shares of
the Company's common stock for each share of Walden common stock. The Company's
outstanding stock increased by 10,125,540 shares to a total of 28,144,163 shares
on the date of acquisition. Based on the closing price of the Company's stock as
of January 3, 1997, the market value of the shares exchanged totaled $207
million. Walden's two subsidiary banks, The Bank of Braintree and The
Co-operative Bank of Concord operate a total of seventeen branches located in
Massachusetts counties of Middlesex, Norfolk and Plymouth. It is expected that
these banks will be merged with USTrust, the Company's principal banking
subsidiary, during 1997. At December 31, 1996, Walden had total loans and total
assets of $604 million and $1.0 billion, respectively, and total deposits and
total stockholders' investment of $750 million and $98 million, respectively.
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information as of
December 31, 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 has
been prepared to give effect to the Walden acquisition using the pooling of
interests method of accounting. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements
of income data have been derived from the audited statements of income of the
Company and Walden for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994. The
unaudited pro forma balance sheet data have been derived from the audited
consolidated balance sheets of the Company and Walden as of December 31, 1996.
Such unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations or financial condition which would have
actually been reported had the merger of the Company and Walden occurred on the
assumed dates, nor is it necessarily indicative of the future results of
operations or financial condition of the Company. The unaudited pro forma
December 31, 1996 balance sheet data reflects an after-tax charge for estimated
merger and reorganization expenses as of the date of this filing of $9.1
million, ($13.5 million pre-tax) net of an estimated 40 percent tax benefit
(after excluding $2.5 million of nondeductible expense); however, since these
expenses are nonrecurring, they have not been reflected in the unaudited pro
forma statements of income data. The pro forma statements of income data also do
not give effect to any anticipated cost savings in connection with the
combination.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net interest income $ 135,255 $ 133,360 $ 127,792
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (17,300) 14,115 25,481
Noninterest income 44,216 38,698 38,002
Noninterest expense 126,329 118,820 119,133
Net income $ 43,181 $ 24,257 $ 14,234
Net income per share $ 1.52 $ .86 $ .51
</TABLE>
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
(Dollars in thousands) December 31, 1996
Total loans, net of reserve for possible loan losses $ 2,402,609
Total assets 3,684,743
Total deposits 2,855,812
Total stockholders' investment $ 286,490
(3) Restrictions on Cash and Due From Banks
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, cash and due from banks included $32.7 million
and $34.8 million, respectively, to satisfy the reserve requirements of the
Federal Reserve.
40
(4) Securities
A comparison of the amortized cost, estimated fair value and gross unrealized
gains and losses as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 for securities
available-for-sale follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(Dollars in thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
FHLMC $ 139,886 $ 735 $ (1,783) $ 138,838
FNMA 78,931 370 (1,161) 78,140
--------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total mortgage-backed securities 218,817 1,105 (2,944) 216,978
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies 172,828 96 (2,863) 170,061
Asset-backed securities 61,640 75 (74) 61,641
FHLBB equity securities* 38,851 38,851
Corporate debt securities 30,142 42 (4) 30,180
States and municipalities 2,233 42 2,275
Marketable equity securities 1,667 257 (6) 1,918
Foreign governments 365 365
All other securities* 5,905 5,905
--------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total securities available-for-sale $ 532,448 $ 1,617 $ (5,891) $ 528,174
========= ========= ========== =========
</TABLE>
* Equity securities of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston ("FHLBB") and
certain other securities, which did not have readily determinable market values
at December 31, 1996, were carried at cost. The Company's largest banking
subsidiary, USTrust, became a member of the FHLBB in 1996 and is required to
invest in the FHLBB in an amount equal to the greater of 1 percent of
residential mortgage loans, including certain mortgage-backed securities, or
three-tenths of 1 percent of total assets or a specified percentage of
outstanding advances.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(Dollars in thousands) Cost Gains Losses Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
FHLMC $155,916 $ 1,486 $ (411) $156,991
FNMA 89,239 799 (508) 89,530
-------- --------- --------- --------
Total mortgage-backed securities 245,155 2,285 (919) 246,521
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies 197,641 570 (1,244) 196,967
Asset-backed securities 85,157 443 85,600
Corporate debt securities 40,499 323 (2) 40,820
States and municipalities 3,169 85 3,254
Marketable equity securities 1,806 159 (20) 1,945
Foreign governments 390 390
All other securities 176 176
-------- --------- --------- --------
Total securities available-for-sale $573,993 $ 3,865 $ (2,185) $575,673
======== ========= ========= ========
</TABLE>
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 31,
1996 and 1995, by contractual maturity, are shown in the table below. Actual
maturities are expected to differ from contractual maturities because some
borrowers have the right to prepay without penalty. Mortgage-backed securities
are shown at their final maturity but are expected to have shorter average
lives. Equity securities, which have no contractual maturity, are presented in
the aggregate.
41
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
Amortized Estimated Amortized Estimated
(Dollars in thousands) Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Due after 1 year through 5 years $ 573 $ 591
Due after 5 years through 10 years 62,928 63,040 $ 38,276 $ 38,521
Due after 10 years 155,316 153,347 206,879 208,000
--------- ---------- -------- ---------
Total mortgage-backed securities 218,817 216,978 245,155 246,521
All other debt securities:
Due in 1 year or less 33,839 33,885 22,052 22,197
Due after 1 year through 5 years 199,930 198,196 233,296 233,676
Due after 5 years through 10 years 32,964 31,949 70,594 70,198
Due after 10 years 475 492 914 960
--------- ---------- -------- ---------
Total debt securities 486,025 481,500 572,011 573,552
Equity securities and other 46,423 46,674 1,982 2,121
--------- ---------- -------- ---------
Total $ 532,448 $ 528,174 $573,993 $ 575,673
========= ========== ======== =========
</TABLE>
Total gross realized gains, gross realized losses, and proceeds from the sale or
other disposition of securities available-for-sale for the three years ended
December 31 were:
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
Securities available-for-sale:
Debt securities:
Gross realized gains $ 14 $ 132 $ 79
Gross realized losses (333) (229)
Proceeds from sales* 28,809 53,474 60,061
Equity securities:
Gross realized gains $ 1,551 $ 2,148 $ 1,026
Gross realized losses (119) (249)
Proceeds from sales* 1,585 2,545 1,608
* Excluded from 1996 proceeds from sales was a reduction in securities
available-for-sale of $21.4 million in debt securities and $.1 million in equity
securities in connection with the UST/Conn sale.
At December 31, 1996, securities carried at $309.7 million were pledged to
secure public and trust deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and for other purposes as required by law.
(5) Loans
The composition of the loan portfolio (net of unearned discount) at December 31,
1996 and 1995 was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
Commercial and financial $ 746,762 $ 642,940
Commercial real estate:
Construction 27,256 16,937
Developer, investor and land 172,390 207,710
Consumer:
Residential mortgage 443,071 85,806
Home equity 86,046 70,066
Indirect automobile installment 301,072 197,148
Other consumer 31,026 23,015
Lease financing 40,519 28,455
---------- ----------
1,848,142 1,272,077
Reserve for possible loan losses (38,789) (56,029)
---------- ----------
$1,809,353 $1,216,048
========== ==========
42
Most of the Company's lending activity is with customers located within
Massachusetts. At year-end 1996, the Company's exposure to credit risk
principally secured by commercial real estate, home equity and residential real
estate included $729 million of loans. Refer to Note 16 for additional
discussion of concentration of credit risk.
Reserve for Possible Loan Losses
An analysis of the reserve for possible loan losses for the three years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period $ 56,029 $ 64,088 $ 64,465
Chargeoffs/transfers 5,859 29,074 31,059
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off 9,323 7,925 6,401
---------- ---------- ---------
Net (recoveries) chargeoffs (3,464) 21,149 24,658
Provision (credit) for possible loan losses (18,600) 13,090 24,281
Reserve of sold bank (2,104)
---------- ---------- ---------
Balance at end of period $ 38,789 $ 56,029 $ 64,088
========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, total impaired loans were $24.2 million, comprised of $.5
million that required reserves of $.3 million and $23.7 million that did not
require a related reserve since there was no dollar impairment as measured by
the provisions of SFAS No. 114. As of December 31, 1995, total impaired loans
were $25.7 million comprised of $1.4 million that required reserves of $.3
million and $24.3 million that did not require a related reserve. The average
recorded investment in impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995 was $21 million and $45 million, respectively. The methodology used in the
required reserve calculation utilized the fair value of collateral. For the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the amount of interest income on
impaired loans that would have been recognized if the loans had been paying in
accordance with their original terms, was $2.6 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, while the amount recognized as interest income in the same periods
was $.5 million and $.9 million, respectively.
(6) Premises, Furniture and Equipment
A summary of the accounts as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
Land $ 3,201 $ 2,746
Buildings and leasehold improvements 40,263 33,037
Furniture and equipment 19,882 15,343
--------- ----------
63,346 51,126
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (21,834) (19,286)
--------- ----------
$ 41,512 $ 31,840
========= ==========
Depreciation and amortization expenses reflected in the consolidated statements
of income were $3.8 million, $3.4 million and $3.9 million in 1996, 1995 and
1994, respectively.
(7) Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned is stated net of a valuation allowance. An analysis of
the valuation allowance for the three years ended December 31, 1996 is as
follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
Balance at beginning of period $ 568 $ 1,044 $ 4,635
Chargeoffs (744) (2,511) (5,951)
Provision charged to operations 496 2,035 2,360
------ ------- -------
Balance at end of period $ 320 $ 568 $ 1,044
====== ======= =======
43
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
The net cost of other real estate owned included in foreclosed asset and workout
expense in the income statement was approximately $700 thousand, $3.6 million
and $5.3 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. These costs include
provisions charged to operations to reflect reductions in net realizable value,
net gain or loss on sales and cost of maintaining and operating the properties.
(8) Short-term and Other Borrowings
Short-term borrowings consisted of the following at December 31, 1996 and 1995:
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
Short-term borrowings:
Federal funds purchased $ 96,677 $ 57,406
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 236,552 172,689
Treasury tax and loan note account 14,837 12,867
Other borrowings 143
--------- ---------
$ 348,066 $ 243,105
========= =========
During the year the Company's largest subsidiary bank, USTrust, became a member
of the FHLBB. As of December 31, 1996, the bank had a borrowing capacity with
the FHLBB of $287.5 million which the bank utilized and classified as short-term
borrowings during the year. As of December 31, 1996, however, there were no
FHLBB advances outstanding.
The weighted average interest rates for short-term borrowings at December 31,
1996 and 1995 were 4.93 percent and 4.98 percent, respectively. The average
outstanding short-term borrowings were $328.8 million in 1996 and $179.3 million
in 1995. The approximate weighted average interest rates during the year were
4.95 percent in 1996 and 5.18 percent in 1995. The maximum amount of short-term
borrowings outstanding at any month end was $577.8 million in 1996 and $243.0
million in 1995.
(9) Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a noncontributory, defined benefit retirement plan covering all
employees who meet specified age and employment requirements. The Company also
has a nonqualified, unfunded supplemental retirement plan, which covers certain
officers of the Company. The plans provide pension benefits that are based on
the employee's compensation during the highest four consecutive years before
retirement. The following summary sets forth each plan's funded status and
amounts included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
1996 and 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Qualified Plan Supplemental Plan
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1996 1995
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Vested benefit obligation $ 15,781 $ 15,124 $ 1,372 $ 1,186
Nonvested benefit obligation 1,159 402 91 26
-------- -------- -------- --------
Accumulated benefit obligation 16,940 15,526 1,463 1,212
Effect of projected future compensation levels 4,423 3,863 423 330
-------- -------- -------- --------
Projected benefit obligation for service rendered to date 21,363 19,389 1,886 1,542
Plan assets, primarily listed stocks and U.S. bonds 22,907 20,514
-------- -------- -------- --------
Excess (deficiency) of plan assets over projected benefit obligation 1,544 1,125 (1,886) (1,542)
Unrecognized (gain) loss (454) 2,753 (238) (197)
Unrecognized prior service asset (obligation) 1,115 (683) 541 292
Unrecognized net transition asset (1,083) (1,354)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Prepaid (accrued) costs included in other assets (other liabilities) $ 1,122 $ 1,841 $ (1,583) $ (1,447)
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The actuarial assumptions used were as follows:
1996 1995
Discount rate 7.5% 7.0%
Rate of increase of future compensation levels 4.5% 4.0%
Expected rate of return on plan assets 8.0% 9.0%
44
Net pension cost for 1996, 1995 and 1994 included the following components:
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
Service cost benefit earned during the period $ 1,337 $ 862 $ 1,050
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 1,473 1,377 1,265
Return on plan assets (3,032) (4,248) 325
Net amortization and deferral 1,173 2,805 (1,789)
------- ------- -------
Net pension cost $ 951 $ 796 $ 851
======= ======= =======
The Company has an Employee Savings Plan which qualifies as a deferred salary
arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Plan,
participating employees may defer a portion up to 10 percent of their pretax
earnings not to exceed the Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limits.
During 1996 the Company matched each eligible employee's contributions up to 5
percent of the employee's earnings. The rate of matching was 100 percent for the
first 1 percent of each employee's contribution and a rate of 25 percent for
contributions of greater than 1 percent up to the 5 percent maximum. Effective
January 1, 1997, the Company increased the maximum amount participating
employees may defer from 10 percent to 12 percent. The Company also increased
its matching contribution from 5 percent to 6 percent. The new rate of matching
is 100 percent for the first 2 percent of each employee's contribution and a
rate of 25 percent for contributions greater than 2 percent up to the new 6
percent maximum.
The Company has an employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") which covers
substantially all of its employees. The plan is administered by a committee
designated by the Board of Directors and is maintained in a separate trust
established for that purpose. Under the plan, the Company contributes either a
fixed amount or a percentage of compensation of all participants.
Certain key employees are awarded shares of the Company's common stock through
the Company's Restricted Stock Ownership Plan adopted in 1989 and the restricted
stock program of the Stock Compensation Plan adopted in 1992 and amended in
1994. Under these restricted stock plans 512,970 shares of common stock have
been granted. The shares vest to the employee over varying schedules. In 1996,
44,466 restricted shares vested under this plan. At December 31, 1996, there
were 54,600 unvested restricted shares outstanding.
Expenses relating to the plans were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
Employee Employee Savings
(Dollars in thousands) Pension Stock Ownership Restricted Stock Plan 401(k)
<C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 $951 $425 $531 $453
1995 796 425 490 273
1994 851 425 558 198
</TABLE>
(10) Stock Options
The Company has a Stock Compensation Plan for officers and key employees under
the terms of which the Company may issue incentive stock options, nonqualified
stock options and shares of restricted stock. At December 31, 1996, 64,509
shares of the Company's common stock remained available for future grants. The
Company's Stock Compensation Plan provides that the number of shares of common
stock reserved for future grants under the plan be increased by an amount equal
to 1.25 percent of the number of shares outstanding on the first day of each
fiscal year. As a result, as of January 1, 1997, 225,233 additional common
shares are to be reserved for future grants. The vesting periods for options
under this Plan range from immediate vesting at grant date to 5 years. The
expiration periods for options under this Plan range from 5 to 10 years.
The Company has two stock option plans for Directors, the 1996 Director Option
Plan and the 1995 Director Option Plan. Eligible Directors received option
grants at fair value for 5,000 shares in 1996 and up to 7,500 shares in 1995. A
total of 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock were reserved for issuance
under each Plan. The vesting periods for options under these Plans range from
immediate vesting at grant date to 3 years. The expiration periods for options
under these Plans range from 5 to 10 years.
The vesting periods for certain options under the aforementioned employee and
Director Plans can be accelerated in accordance with the Plans based on
prescribed movement in the market price of the Company's stock or other
conditions. Under all option Plans the option exercise price equaled the market
price of the Company's stock on date of grant.
45
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
The Company has opted to continue to measure stock compensation in accordance
with APB Opinion No. 25. Refer to Note 1, Recent Accounting Developments, for a
further discussion. If the Company had determined stock compensation cost
consistent with the fair value alternative contained in SFAS No. 123, the
Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro
forma amounts presented in the table below.
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) 1996 1995
Net income:
As reported $ 32,662 $ 14,958
Pro forma $ 31,959 $ 14,790
Earnings per share:
As reported $ 1.79 $ .83
Pro forma $ 1.75 $ .82
The following table presents the activity for the employee stock option program
under the Stock Compensation Plan and the activity in the Stock Option Plans for
Directors for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994:
Number of Shares Exercise Price Weighted Average
Under Option Per Share Exercise Price
Outstanding December 31, 1993 709,359 $5.00 - $12.00 $ 6.74
Granted in 1994 1,004,500 $9.00 - $13.38 $10.41
Canceled in 1994 (283,337) $6.07 - $13.38 $12.50
Exercised in 1994 (128,358) $6.07 - $8.62 $6.17
---------
Outstanding December 31, 1994 1,302,164 $5.00 - $12.00 $8.46
---------
Granted in 1995 282,300 $10.75 - $14.13 $13.21
Canceled in 1995 (26,365) $6.07 - $9.75 $8.68
Exercised in 1995 (195,206) $5.00 - $9.75 $6.74
---------
Outstanding December 31, 1995 1,362,893 $5.00 - $14.13 $9.61
---------
Granted in 1996 320,500 $13.44 - $14.81 $13.91
Canceled in 1996 (34,849) $6.07 - $12.88 $10.16
Exercised in 1996 (384,804) $6.07 - $13.44 $7.04
---------
Outstanding December 31, 1996 1,263,740 $5.00 - $14.81 $11.47
=========
Options exercisable at:
December 31, 1994 769,186 $5.00 - $12.00 $8.06
December 31, 1995 838,614 $5.00 - $14.13 $8.48
December 31, 1996 1,141,340 $5.00 - $14.81 $11.30
At December 31, 1996, 199,840 of the 1,263,740 options outstanding have exercise
prices between $5.00 and $9.00, with a weighted average exercise price of $8.85
and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.8 years. Of these
options, 197,840 are exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $8.85.
The remaining 1,063,900 options have exercise prices between $9.75 and $14.81,
with a weighted average exercise price of $11.96 and a weighted average
remaining contractual life of 5.4 years. Of these options, 943,500 are
exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $11.81.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995 was $1.99 and $3.36, respectively. The fair value of
each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for
grants in 1996 and 1995:
Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995
Risk-free interest rate 5.94% 5.15%
Expected dividend yield 3.5% 3.5%
Expected life in years 2.3 2.0
Expected volatility 18.12% 18.25%
46
In December 1994, the Board of Directors authorized an option substitution
program permitting employees to surrender options with an option price of more
than $9.75 (the fair market value) in exchange for new options on a one-for-one
basis. Outstanding options for 273,500 shares were exchanged under the program.
The Company has a Directors Deferred Compensation Program under which up to
250,000 shares of the Company's common stock may be granted to Directors of the
Company or its banking subsidiaries who choose to receive their Director's fees
or stipend in shares of the Company in lieu of cash.
(11) Noninterest Expense
Deposit Insurance Assessment
The Company's deposit insurance assessment reflects premiums paid to two Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") funds, the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF")
for banks, as well as the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF") for
savings and loan associations ("Thrifts") due to the Company's 1990 purchase of
deposits of a failed Thrift institution. The deposit insurance assessment for
the year ended December 31, 1996 reflects a reduction in expense due to reduced
premium rates by the FDIC on BIF balances, offset with a one-time $3.0 million
assessment by the SAIF on the former Thrift deposits held by the Company.
Acquisition Charges
The 1996 acquisition charges include $793 thousand in expenses incurred in
connection with the January 1997 acquisition of Walden and a $5.1 million
provision for acquisition expenses related to the Branch Purchase for a total of
$5.9 million.
The 1996 acquisition charges for Walden were primarily for professional, legal,
accounting and investment banking services incurred which were not contingent on
the completion of the transaction. The Branch Purchase provision consisted
largely of customer-related expenses such as direct mailings, replacement checks
and ATM and Debit cards, promotions, target advertising and various incentive
programs directed toward the new customers acquired in the purchase transaction.
The major components of acquisition charges were:
(Dollars in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 1996
Customer communications and retention $ 3,185
Professional services 2,043
Regulatory fees and filings 172
Other 533
--------
$ 5,933
========
During 1997, the Company expects to record a pretax restructuring charge of
approximately $13.5 million in connection with the Walden acquisition.
Other Noninterest Expense
The major components of other noninterest expense were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Furniture and equipment depreciation and maintenance $ 4,164 $ 3,572 $ 3,476
Legal and consulting 2,994 2,356 3,553
Advertising and promotion 2,867 2,123 2,307
Amortization of intangibles 1,703 1,798 1,367
Service bureau and other data processing 1,657 1,274 1,173
Facility consolidation provisions 84 1,895 480
All other 12,463 9,951 11,171
------- ------- -------
Total other noninterest expense $25,932 $22,969 $23,527
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
47
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
(12) Income Taxes
The income tax provision (benefit) included in the consolidated statements of
income consisted of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
Current tax expense (benefit)*:
Federal $ 11,705 $ 7,860 $ (6,230)
State 5,997 2,867 1,147
-------- -------- ---------
17,702 10,727 (5,083)
-------- -------- ---------
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
Federal 4,463 (1,735) 6,588
State (1,151) 177 546
-------- -------- ---------
3,312 (1,558) 7,134
-------- -------- ---------
Total $ 21,014 $ 9,169 $ 2,051
======== ======== =========
* The 1996 and 1995 current provisions do not reflect $301 thousand and $286
thousand, respectively, of tax benefits related to stock options exercised that
were credited directly to additional paid-in capital.
As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, cumulative deferred tax assets, included in
the consolidated balance sheets as other assets, amounted to $5.0 million and
$8.7 million, respectively, while cumulative deferred tax liabilities of $1.3
million and $1.7 million, respectively, were included in other liabilities.
Additionally, at December 31, 1996, there were tax refund receivables of
approximately $2 million included in other assets while current taxes payable
were approximately $2 million in both periods and included in other liabilities.
The components of the net deferred tax asset were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Book provision for loan losses in excess of tax $ 16,173 $ 23,117
Alternative minimum tax credit 3,243 6,768
Deferred compensation benefits not deducted for tax 1,905 1,449
Book writedowns on foreclosed real estate, not deducted for tax 137 240
Securities mark to market adjustment deferred for tax 114 (1,198)
Tax basis in core deposits less than book 71 (355)
Tax deductions on leveraged leases deferred for book (11,407) (14,919)
Loan mark to market adjustment for tax (2,189) (12,990)
Cumulative tax depreciation in excess of book (1,551) (583)
Tax basis in partnership investment less than book (789) (704)
Pension expense deducted for tax not book (557) (741)
Investment tax credits 5,498
Valuation allowance (state) (181)
Other, net (1,479) 1,582
-------- --------
Total net deferred tax asset $ 3,671 $ 6,983
======== ========
</TABLE>
48
The provisions for income taxes differ from the amounts computed by applying the
U.S. statutory federal tax rate of 35 percent in 1996 and 1995 and 34 percent in
1994, to income before income taxes principally due to:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax at statutory rate $ 18,772 $ 8,444 $ 2,311
Increases (reductions) from:
Tax-exempt income on investment securities and loans (457) (596) (676)
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 3,150 1,979 1,118
Low income housing credits (911) (724) (911)
Nondeductible expenses and other, net 460 66 209
-------- -------- --------
Tax expense recorded $ 21,014 $ 9,169 $ 2,051
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
(13) Capital
The Company and its banking subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to
meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly
additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have
a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action,
the Company and its subsidiary banks must meet specific capital guidelines that
involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance
sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital
amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the
regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Company and its banking subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and
ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in
the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as
defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31,
1996, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is
subject and that USTrust, while undercapitalized by regulatory definition, is in
compliance with the capital conditions set forth in the FDIC's approval of the
purchase of twenty banking branches discussed below.
Prior to the initiation of the purchase of the twenty former Bank of Boston and
BayBank branches, USTrust was defined as "well capitalized" as its capital
levels significantly exceeded the required minimum level for each relevant
capital category. In advance of the execution of a definitive agreement to
purchase the branches, pro forma financial information and projections were
presented to the regulators setting forth a program under which the bank would
become "adequately capitalized." The regulations prescribe that the FDIC, in its
discretion, may approve an application pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act where it is required to consider the adequacy of capital or the financial
resources of the insured depository institution where it finds that the
Applicant has committed to and is in compliance with a reasonable plan to meet
its minimum leverage capital requirements within a reasonable time period. The
transaction received the approval of bank regulators with the condition that
USTrust must have a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of not less than: (i) 4.8
percent, no later than ten days after consummation of the acquisition of the
sixteen BayBank branches; and (ii) 5 percent, no later than three months after
consummation of the acquisition of the BayBank branches and for a period of six
months thereafter. At December 31, 1996, USTrust was in compliance with the
foregoing provisions. As measured by the ratio of Total capital to risk-based
assets at December 31, 1996, USTrust temporarily fell below therequirements of
an "adequately capitalized" bank. Management believes that USTrust will meet all
of the conditions of an "adequately capitalized" bank during 1997 at or prior to
the merger of the Walden banks with and into USTrust. Until USTrust meets the
conditions of an "adequately capitalized" bank, it may not issue dividends or
make other capital distributions and may not accept brokered or high-rate
deposits in accordance with federal banking regulations. The Company expects
that the foregoing conditions and restrictions will not have a material adverse
impact on the future operations of USTrust.
The actual capital amounts and ratios of the Company and its banking
subsidiaries are presented in the following summary.
49
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1996
Amount Percent
Adequately Well Adequately Well
Capitalized Capitalized Capitalized Capitalized
(Dollars in millions) Actual Minimums Minimums Actual Minimums Minimums
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
UST Corp. Consolidated:
Tier 1 leverage capital $ 146.7 $ 92.3 N/A 6.36% 4.00% N/A
Tier 1 capital 146.7 84.7 N/A 6.93% 4.00% N/A
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) capital 173.1 168.4 N/A 8.23% 8.00% N/A
USTrust:
Tier 1 leverage capital 126.4 109.6 $109.6 5.77% 5.00% 5.00%
Tier 1 capital 126.4 84.0 126.0 6.02% 4.00% 6.00%
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) capital 152.7 167.1 208.9 7.31% 8.00% 10.00%
USTC:
Tier 1 leverage capital 2.1 .7 .8 12.43% 4.00% 5.00%
Tier 1 capital 2.1 .3 .5 27.87% 4.00% 6.00%
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) capital 2.1 .6 .8 27.88% 8.00% 10.00%
December 31, 1995
Amount Percent
Adequately Well Adequately Well
Capitalized Capitalized Capitalized Capitalized
(Dollars in millions) Actual Minimums Minimums Actual Minimums Minimums
UST Corp. Consolidated:
Tier 1 leverage capital $ 167.4 $ 75.8 N/A 8.83% 4.00% N/A
Tier 1 capital 167.4 65.3 N/A 10.24% 4.00% N/A
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) capital 187.8 127.7 N/A 11.75% 8.00% N/A
USTrust:
Tier 1 leverage capital 141.7 107.3 $ 89.4 7.92% 6.00%* 5.00%
Tier 1 capital 141.7 62.1 93.2 9.12% 4.00% 6.00%
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) capital 161.1 121.5 151.9 10.60% 8.00% 10.00%
USTC:
Tier 1 leverage capital 5.0 .9 .8 32.99% 6.00%* 5.00%
Tier 1 capital 5.0 .3 .4 69.65% 4.00% 6.00%
Total (Tier 1 and Tier 2) capital 5.0 .5 .7 69.65% 8.00% 10.00%
</TABLE>
* Both USTrust and United States Trust Company were under respective Board of
Directors' resolutions that required each bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage
capital of at least 6 percent and not pay a dividend which would cause the
individual bank's Tier 1 leverage capital to fall below 6 percent. Such Board
resolutions with regulatory approval were rescinded during 1996 and are no
longer applicable.
Dividends
The Company and its banking subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends is subject to
certain limitations imposed by statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and
limitations imposed by bank and bank holding company regulators. Massachusetts
statutes restrict the amount of dividends payable by banks to be the balance of
their undivided profits, net of any amount transferred to capital in excess of
par value. It is not likely, however, that bank and bank holding company
regulators would allow an institution to dividend any amounts which would reduce
that institution's capital to below minimum capital requirements.
In 1996 the Company declared quarterly cash dividends totaling $5.2 million, or
$0.29 per share to stockholders. During the year the Company received dividends
from subsidiaries of $6 million from USTC, $5.7 million from USTrust and $1
million from JSA Financial Corporation, a nonbanking subsidiary, and $3 million
from UST/Conn, a former banking subsidiary sold during the year. During 1996 the
Company contributed as capital $13 million to USTrust to facilitate the Branch
Purchase. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of the Branch Purchase.
50
Shareholder Rights Plan
In 1995, the Company's Board of Directors approved a Shareholder Rights Plan and
distributed preferred share purchase rights to shareholders. The rights will
become exercisable only if a person or group (i) acquires 15 percent or more of
the Company's common stock, (ii) announces a tender offer that would result in
ownership of 15 percent or more of the common stock, or (iii) is declared to be
an "Adverse Person" by the Company's Board of Directors. "Adverse Person"
includes any person or group who owns at least 10 percent of the Company's
common stock and attempts an action that would adversely impact the Company.
Each right would entitle a stockholder to purchase 1/100th of a share of a new
series of junior participating preferred stock.
Once a person or group has acquired 15 percent or more of the outstanding common
stock of the Company or is declared an "Adverse Person" by the Company's Board
of Directors, each right may entitle its holder (other than the acquiring person
or Adverse Person) to purchase, at an exercise price of $40, shares of common
stock of the Company (or any organization that acquires the Company) at a price
equal to 50 percent of their current market price. Under certain circumstances,
the Continuing Directors (as defined in the rights plan) may exchange the rights
for common stock (or equivalent securities) on a one-for-one basis excluding
rights held by the acquiring person or Adverse Person. The rights may be
redeemed by action of the Board of Directors for $.001 per right.
Stock Repurchase Program
In 1995, the Company's Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program authorizing the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares subject to market
conditions and other factors. The repurchased shares were held as treasury
shares to be used for general corporate purposes, including employee benefit
plans. In the third quarter of 1996 the program was terminated with a total of
250,000 shares repurchased, all of which were reissued in connection with the
exercise of stock options and deferred compensation distributions.
(14) Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company's banking subsidiaries have
granted loans to certain of the Company's directors and executive officers. All
such transactions are made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing
at the same time for individuals not affiliated with the Company and its
subsidiaries and at the time they were granted did not involve more than the
normal risk of collectibility. At December 31, 1996, none of these transactions
were on nonaccrual status, nor did they involve delinquent, substandard or
restructured loans.
An analysis of loans outstanding in excess of $60 thousand to directors and
officers related to the foregoing entities at December 31, 1996 is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 1995 $18,744
Repayments (3,172)
Other reductions* (359)
-------
Balance, December 31, 1996 $15,213
=======
* Other reductions are loans outstanding to directors and officers who ceased to
be directors or officers of the Company or its subsidiary banks during the year
or their balance decreased below $60 thousand.
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments for leased premises expire at various dates through 2010. At
December 31, 1996, minimum rental commitments for noncancelable leases are as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
1997 $ 5,228
1998 4,880
1999 4,479
2000 3,953
2001 2,583
thereafter 4,929
-------
Total $26,052
=======
51
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
Rent expense for the years ended December 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $3.4 million,
$3.9 million, and $4.1 million, respectively.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries become
defendants in a variety of judicial and administrative proceedings. In the
opinion of management there is no proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of
management threatened, which in the event of an adverse decision, would result
in a material adverse change in the financial condition or results of operations
of the Company.
(16) Financial Instruments With On- and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the
normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of
credit and financial guarantees, and foreign exchange contracts. Those
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of
the amount contained in the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of
those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in
particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
other party to the financial instrument or commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the
contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance sheet instruments.
The Company generally requires collateral or other security to support financial
instruments with credit risk.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Contract or Notional Amount
(Dollars in thousands) December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Financial instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit $ 652,000 $ 387,000
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written 57,000 48,000
Commercial letters of credit 4,000 3,000
Foreign exchange contracts 2,000 1,000
</TABLE>
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any condition established in the contract during its
term. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination
clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are
expected to expire without being fully drawn upon, the total commitment amounts
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates
each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. Of the total
commitments to extend credit, approximately $132 million and $70 million were
secured by real estate at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively.
The amount of collateral obtained is based on management's evaluation of the
credit risk. Collateral held on commitments and loans varies but may include
cash, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment. Standby and
commercial letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional
commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of, or payment
by, a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to
support private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
facilities to customers. The Company holds various collateral to support these
commitments including (but not limited to) cash, account receivables, inventory,
property plant and equipment. The extent of collateral held for those
commitments varies from zero to one hundred percent.
The Company's primary loan market is the New England region. Most of the loans
outstanding are from eastern Massachusetts and a substantial portion of these
loans are various types of real estate loans; still others have real estate as
additional collateral. Approximately 92 percent of the Company's outstanding
commercial and commercial real estate loans are collateralized.
The Company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to purchase or sell
foreign currencies at a future date at a predetermined exchange rate. Contracts
are purchased on the open market exclusively to assist customers with
international transactions denominated in foreign currencies. The Company is
exposed to credit risk in the event the customer fails to deliver or take
delivery of the agreed upon currency whereby the Company would execute the
transaction with another counterparty at the prevailing currency valuation. The
positive fair value, which represents the credit exposure of contracts
outstanding, was insignificant at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
52
The Company's securities portfolio includes a significant investment in
mortgage-backed securities. These securities carry prepayment risk due to the
fact that prevailing interest rates could decline. Under such circumstances an
unusually high percentage of homeowners may choose to refinance their first
mortgages to take advantage of these lower rates with the result that, under the
Company's accounting policy, adjustments reducing gross unamortized premiums
would be required. Refer to Note 1 for a discussion of accounting policies.
(17) Parent Company Financial Information
Summarized information relative to the balance sheets at December 31, 1996 and
1995 and statements of income and cash flows for the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1996 of UST Corp. (parent company only) are presented as
follows:
Balance Sheets - Parent Company Only
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash, due from banks and interest-bearing deposits $ 837 $ 952
Securities purchased under agreements to resell 14,000 5,000
Securities available-for-sale 2,208
Investment in banking subsidiaries 179,771 161,920
Investment in nonbanking subsidiaries 3,909 5,139
Premises, furniture and equipment, net 393 76
Other assets 5,351 3,645
-------- --------
Total assets $206,469 $176,732
======== ========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment:
Other borrowings $ 143
Other liabilities $ 8,509 2,921
Stockholders' investment 197,960 173,668
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' investment $206,469 $176,732
======== ========
</TABLE>
Statements of Income - Parent Company Only
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Dividend income $ 15,658 $ 5,000 $ 3,000
Undistributed equity in net income of subsidiaries 13,777 10,518 2,492
Gain on sale of bank subsidiary 6,806
Other income 4,685 4,216 731
--------- --------- ---------
40,926 19,734 6,223
Expenses 8,264 4,776 1,477
--------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 32,662 $ 14,958 $ 4,746
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
53
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
Statements of Cash Flows - Parent Company Only
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 32,662 $ 14,958 $ 4,746
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 220 125 447
Undistributed income of subsidiaries (13,777) (10,518) (2,492)
Noncash dividend from subsidiary (2,158)
Gain on sale of bank subsidiary (6,806)
Loss (gain) on sale of securities 2 (5)
(Increase) decrease in other assets (1,756) (558) 536
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 4,808 (1,262) 316
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities 13,193 2,747 3,548
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from securities 15,957 19,961
Purchase of securities (35,912)
Purchases of premises and equipment (415) (10)
Proceeds from sale of bank subsidiary 13,435
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments (9,000) (5,000) 21,000
Equity contributed to subsidiaries (13,000) (7,500) (5,400)
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash (used) provided investing activities (8,980) 3,447 (351)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of other borrowings (8,000) (4,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net 2,795 1,388 792
Treasury stock acquired (3,363)
Cash dividends paid (3,760) (888)
-------- -------- ---------
Net cash used by financing activities (4,328) (7,500) (3,208)
-------- -------- ---------
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (115) (1,306) (11)
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year 952 2,258 2,269
-------- -------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents end of year $ 837 $ 952 $ 2,258
======== ======== =========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ 56 $ 607 $ 938
======== ======== =========
Income taxes $ 12,160 $ 4,970
======== ========
Noncash transactions:
Transfers from other assets to securities available-for-sale $ 50
========
Dividend of equity securities received from subsidiary $ 2,158
========
</TABLE>
Cash dividends paid to the Company in 1996 by consolidated bank subsidiaries
totaled $14.7 million, $4.0 million in 1995 and $3.0 million in 1994. Cash
dividends paid to the Company by nonbank subsidiaries totaled $1.0 million in
both 1996 and 1995 and none in 1994.
(18) Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires
disclosure of the fair market value of financial instruments, whether assets,
liabilities or off-balance sheet commitments, if practicable. The following
methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments. Fair value estimates which were derived from discounted
cash flows or broker quotes cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent
markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the
instrument.
Cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and other short-term investments -
For these short-term instruments the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of
fair value.
Securities available-for-sale - For marketable securities fair values are based
on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Loans - For certain homogeneous categories of loans, such as residential
mortgages and home equity loans, fair value is estimated based on broker quotes
on sales of similar loans. The fair value of fixed rate
54
loans was estimated by discounting anticipated future cash flows using current
rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit
ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of performing
variable rate loans is the same as the book value at the reporting date because
the loans reprice when the market changes.
Deposit liabilities - The fair value of noncertificate deposit accounts is the
amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity
certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the anticipated future cash
payments using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining
maturities.
Short-term and other borrowings - For these short-term instruments the carrying
amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments - For commitments to extend credit,
standby and commercial letters of credit and foreign exchange contracts, the
carrying amount which represents accruals of deferred income (fees) arising from
these instruments, and the fair value of such deferred income is not material.
Refer to Note 16 for notional or contract amounts and a further discussion of
off-balance sheet financial instruments.
Values not determined - SFAS No. 107 excludes certain assets from its disclosure
requirements including real estate included in banking premises and equipment,
and the intangible value inherent in the Company's deposit relationships (i.e.,
core deposits). Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented below do
not represent the underlying value of the Company.
The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company's financial
instruments at December 31, 1996 and 1995 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
(Dollars in thousands) Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial instrument assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 111,532 $ 111,532 $ 89,799 $ 89,799
Securities 528,174 528,174 575,673 575,673
Federal funds sold 127,469 127,469
Loans, net 1,769,340 1,796,218 1,187,949 1,230,762
Loans held-for-sale 102 102 13,098 13,098
Financial instrument liabilities:
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing $ 540,014 $ 540,014 $ 372,917 $ 372,917
NOW 259,265 259,265 166,011 166,011
Money market 243,749 243,749 210,924 210,924
Regular savings 457,769 457,769 244,680 244,680
Time 605,069 605,977 518,205 522,189
Short-term and other borrowings 348,066 348,066 243,105 243,105
</TABLE>
(19) Consolidated Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For Year Ended December 31, 1996 For Year Ended December 31, 1995
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands, Fourth Third Second First Fourth Third Second First
except per share amounts) Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income $43,263 $38,552 $37,700 $38,139 $37,954 $37,626 $36,467 $35,920
Interest expense 16,820 14,948 15,018 14,742 14,311 13,921 12,867 11,436
Net interest income 26,443 23,604 22,682 23,397 23,643 23,705 23,600 24,484
Provision (credit) for
possible loan losses (14,600) (5,500) 1,500 1,800 2,790 3,670 4,830
Net interest income after
provision for possible
loan losses 26,443 38,204 28,182 21,897 21,843 20,915 19,930 19,654
Noninterest income 14,193 9,143 6,952 7,000 7,170 7,083 7,007 8,710
Noninterest expense 30,510 25,546 20,710 21,572 21,619 21,287 21,211 24,070
Income tax expense 3,763 8,863 5,600 2,788 2,895 2,566 2,182 1,524
Net income 6,363 12,938 8,824 4,537 4,499 4,145 3,544 2,770
Earnings per share $ 0.35 $ 0.71 $ 0.49 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.23 $ 0.20 $ 0.16
</TABLE>
55
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 1996
Net income increased steadily throughout 1995 and into the first quarter of
1996. The remaining quarters of 1996 reflect substantial increases in net income
over the 1995 quarters. The net income trend throughout the first five periods
represented above was largely attributed to a decline in provision for possible
loan losses and reduced foreclosed asset and workout expense. The second and
third quarters of 1996 were influenced by $5.5 million and $14.6 million credit
provisions for possible loan losses, respectively.
Net interest income had been on a slow decline in the first six quarters
consistent with the movement of interest rates and earning asset volumes.
Internal asset growth improved net interest income in the third and fourth
quarters of 1996 which also benefited from the earning assets acquired in the
December Branch Purchase.
Noninterest income was relatively consistent throughout the periods presented at
approximately $7 million, except for the first quarter 1995 and third quarter
1996 which included securities gains, and fourth quarter 1996 which included the
$6.8 million gain on the sale of UST/Conn.
As discussed, noninterest expense was on the decline throughout most of the two
years due to lower foreclosed asset and workout expense consistent with the
reduced level of problem assets. The third quarter 1996 noninterest expense
increased sharply due to the one-time $3.0 million SAIF assessment. Noninterest
expense for the fourth quarter of 1996 included acquisition charges of $5.9
million and higher operating expenses incurred in connection with the December
Branch Purchase.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Executive Policy Committee
In 1987, the Board of Directors of the Company created an Executive Policy
Committee which is the primary management forum of the Company for all strategic
and policy decisions. All decisions of the Executive Policy Committee are
subject to the review and approval of the Board of Directors of the Company. The
Executive Policy Committee has been directed by the Board of Directors to make
recommendations to the Board concerning adoption of policies, strategies and
programs concerning the following, among other matters: (a) acquisitions and
dispositions of corporate entities, assets and/or investments; (b) the issuance
of equity and/or debt; (c) engaging in new business activities; (d) the hiring,
termination, training and motivation of senior management; (e) the development
of marketing programs concerning financial services; (f) improvements to
operations, service delivery and implementation of procedures for cost control;
(g) improvements to the financial reporting and financial control systems; (h)
improvements to the business information systems; and (i) improvements
concerning risk management and legal and regulatory compliance programs. As of
March 15, 1997, there were 11 members of the Executive Policy Committee. The
members of the Committee are identified and the background of each Committee
member is set forth below under "Executive Officers".
56
Executive Officers
The names and ages of the executive officers of the Company and each executive
officer's position with the Company and its principal subsidiaries are listed
below. Each such executive officer is elected annually by the Directors of the
Company (or the Directors of the applicable subsidiary of the Company) and
serves until his or her successor is duly chosen and qualified or until his or
her earlier death, removal or disqualification.
Positions and Offices with the Company (and/or
where appropriate, position with one of the
Name Age Company's subsidiaries)
*Neal F. Finnegan 59 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
of the Company and Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of USTrust, Braintree
and Concord
*Domenic Colasacco 48 Executive Vice President/Trust and Investment
Management and Director of the Company and
Chairman and President of USTC
*James K. Hunt 53 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company; Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
USTrust; Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of Braintree
and Concord and Treasurer of UST Leasing
Corporation
*Eric R. Fischer 51 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Clerk of the Company; Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary of USTrust, USTC,
Braintree and Concord and Clerk of UST Capital
Corp. and UST Leasing Corporation
*Kathie S. Stevens 46 Executive Vice President and Senior Lending
Officer of the Company; Vice Chairman and
Senior Lending Officer of USTrust and President
of UST Capital Corp.
*Katharine C. Armstrong 52 Executive Vice President/Commercial Lending of
the Company, USTrust, Braintree and Concord
*Robert T. McAlear 54 Executive Vice President/Controlled Loans,
Credit and Acquisition Integration of the
Company; Vice Chairman of USTrust and Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Braintree
*Suzanne Moot 47 Executive Vice President/Marketing and Retail
Banking of the Company and USTrust
*Walter E. Huskins, Jr. 57 Executive Vice President/Administration of the
Company and USTrust; Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of Concord and
President of UST Leasing Corporation
*Linda J. Lerner 52 Senior Vice President/Human Resources of the
Company, USTrust and USTC
*Kenneth L. Sullivan 60 Senior Vice President/Operations of the Company
and Senior Vice President of USTrust George T.
Clarke 50 Senior Vice President and Controller
of the Company and USTrust and Treasurer of UST
Capital Corp.
* Member, Executive Policy Committee
The following sets forth the principal occupation during the past five years of
each of the executive officers of the Company.
Mr. Finnegan has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since 1993. During the prior five years, Mr. Finnegan was Executive Vice
President in charge of Private Banking at Bankers Trust Company, New York, New
York. From 1986 to 1988, Mr. Finnegan was President and Chief Operating Officer
of Bowery Savings Bank in New York City. From 1982 to 1986 he was Vice Chairman
of Shawmut Corporation in Boston. Mr. Finnegan also serves as Vice Chairman of
the Board of Trustees of Northeastern University. Mr. Finnegan is also Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of USTrust, Braintree and Concord and a
Director and Chairman of the Executive Committee of USTC.
Mr. Colasacco was elected Executive Vice President and a Director of the Company
in 1990. In 1993, he was also elected Chairman of the Board and President of
USTC. Prior to that time, he served as an Executive Vice President of USTC. He
also directs the trust and investment management activities of the Company and
its subsidiaries. Mr. Colasacco has been an officer of the Company or of one of
its subsidiaries since 1974.
Mr. Hunt was elected Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company in 1994. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hunt served as
Executive Vice President at Peoples Bancorp of Worcester, Inc., Worcester,
Massachusetts, from 1987 through mid-1994. He also serves as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of USTrust, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
57
and Treasurer of Braintree and Concord and as Treasurer of UST Leasing
Corporation and various other nonbanking subsidiaries.
Mr. Fischer was elected Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Clerk of
the Company in 1992. Prior to 1992, he served as Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Assistant Clerk of the Company. Before joining the Company in 1986,
he served as Assistant General Counsel of Bank of Boston Corporation and its
principal subsidiary, The First National Bank of Boston. Mr. Fischer is, and has
been since 1984, a member of the faculty of the Morin Center for Banking and
Financial Law Studies of Boston University School of Law. He also serves as
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of USTC, USTrust,
Braintree and Concord and Clerk of UST Capital Corp., UST Leasing Corporation
and various other nonbanking subsidiaries.
Ms. Stevens, who has served as Executive Vice President and Senior Lending
Officer of the Company since 1993, was also elected to the positions of Vice
Chairman and Senior Lending Officer of USTrust and Chairman of the Senior Credit
Committee of the Company and USTrust in 1995. Ms. Stevens has been a senior
officer in the Commercial Lending function since she joined the Company in 1985.
Ms. Stevens is also President of UST Capital Corp.
Ms. Armstrong serves as Executive Vice President/Commercial Lending of the
Company, USTrust, Braintree and Concord. In that capacity she oversees the
commercial lending, asset-based lending and commercial real estate lending
functions of the Company. From 1993 to 1995 Ms. Armstrong served as Senior Vice
President/Credit Administration of the Company. Ms. Armstrong joined the Company
in 1985 and served in various credit administration functions from 1985 until
she assumed her position as Executive Vice President/Commercial Lending in 1995.
Mr. McAlear was elected Executive Vice President/Controlled Loans and Credit of
the Company in 1994. He has served as Vice Chairman of USTrust since he joined
the Company in 1990. His primary responsibilities involve the supervision of the
controlled loan, owned real estate and credit administration functions of
USTrust and the Company, as well as supervision of the integration of banks and
branches acquired by the Company. Prior to 1990, Mr. McAlear served as an
Executive Vice President in the lending area of the Bank of New England. Mr.
McAlear also serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Braintree.
Ms. Moot joined the Company in 1995 and serves as Executive Vice
President/Marketing and Retail Banking of the Company and USTrust. Prior to
joining the Company, Ms. Moot served as a consultant to more than two dozen
commercial and savings bank clients between 1988 and 1995 and served as Vice
President of Commercial Marketing at Shawmut Bank, Boston, MA from 1985 to 1988.
Mr. Huskins was elected Executive Vice President/Administration of the Company
in August 1993. Mr. Huskins is also responsible for the leasing activities of
the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Huskins served as President,
Sterling Protection Company, Watertown, MA (security systems) from 1990 to 1993
and as Vice Chairman of Chancellor Corporation, Boston, MA (leasing) from 1977
to 1989. Mr. Huskins also serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Concord and Chairman of the Board and President of UST Leasing
Corporation.
Ms. Lerner has served as Senior Vice President of the Company since she joined
the Company in 1988. She directs the Human Resources activities of the Company,
USTrust and USTC. Prior to her joining the Company, Ms. Lerner served in a
similar capacity for the Provident Institution for Savings in Boston.
Mr. Sullivan has served as Senior Vice President/Operations of the Company since
1994. He has served since 1988 and continues to serve as Senior Vice President
of USTrust. In those capacities, he has responsibility for the data processing
and information systems of the Company as well as for its operations activities.
Prior to 1988, Mr. Sullivan served as Executive Vice President of Operations
with BayBanks Systems, Inc. in Waltham, Massachusetts. Prior to 1995, he also
served as President of UST Data Services Corp. which as of December 31, 1995 was
dissolved and became a division of USTrust.
Mr. Clarke was elected Senior Vice President and Controller of the Company in
1994 and of USTrust in 1996. From 1988 to 1994 he served as Vice President and
Controller of the Company. Before joining the Company, Mr. Clarke served as
Deputy Comptroller of The First National Bank of Boston. Mr. Clarke is also
Treasurer of UST Capital Corp.
There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and
any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an executive
officer.
Other than the information provided in the preceding paragraphs of this Item 10,
this item has been omitted since the Company will have filed a definitive proxy
statement within 120 days after December 31, 1996, the close of its fiscal year.
The additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
such proxy statement.
58
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
This item has been omitted since the Company will have filed a definitive proxy
statement within 120 days after December 31, 1996, the close of its fiscal year.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such proxy
statement.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
This item has been omitted since the Company will have filed a definitive proxy
statement within 120 days after December 31, 1996, the close of its fiscal year.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such proxy
statement.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
executive officers and directors to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Executive Officers and
Directors are required by the SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies
of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based on its review of the copies of such forms received by it and the
information provided by the Directors of the Company, the Company believes that,
during 1996, all such filing requirements applicable to its executive officers
and directors were complied with by such individuals.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
This item has been omitted since the Company will have filed a definitive proxy
statement within 120 days after December 31, 1996, the close of its fiscal year.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to such proxy
statement.
PART IV
ITEM 14. Exhibits. Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) List the following documents filed as part of this report:
1. All financial statements
UST Corp. and Subsidiaries
See Index to Financial Statements.
2. Financial statement schedules required to be filed by Item 8 of Form
10-K and by Item 14(d)
None (Information included in Financial Statements).
3. Exhibits required to be filed by Item 501 of Regulation S-K and by Item
13(c)
(3) Articles: By-Laws
3(a) Articles of Organization of the Company as amended to
date.*
3(b) By-laws of the Company as amended to date. (Exhibit to
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1994)**
(4) Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including
indentures:
4(a) Specimen of the Company's Common Stock Certificate.
(Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Registration Statement No.
2-67787 on Form S-l.)**
4(b) Description of rights of the holders of the Company's
Common Stock (Appearing on Page 76 of Registrant's
Registration Statement No. 333-15521 on Form S-4).**
4(c) Note Agreement, dated August 8, 1986, between the
Company and holders of the Company's 8.5% Senior Notes
Due August 1, 1996. (Exhibit 4(d) to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1986.)**
59
4(d) Rights Agreement, dated September 19, 1995, between UST
Corp. and United States Trust Company, as Rights Agent.
(Exhibit to Registrant's Form 8-A filed September 26,
1995)**
4(d)(i) Certificate of Vote Establishing a Series of a
Class of Stock. (Exhibit A to Rights Agreement
between the Company and United States Trust
Company, dated September 19, 1995 and filed as
an Exhibit to Registrant's Form 8-A filed
September 26, 1995.)**
4(d)(ii) Form of Rights Certificate. (Exhibit B to
Rights Agreement between the Company and United
States Trust Company, dated September 19, 1995
and filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Form
8-A filed September 26, 1995.)**
4(d)(iii)Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred
Shares. (Exhibit C to Rights Agreement between
the Company and United States Trust Company,
dated September 19, 1995 and filed as an
Exhibit to Registrant's Form 8-A filed
September 26, 1995.)**
(10) Material Contracts
10(a) Affiliation Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated
as of August 30, 1996, between UST Corp. and Walden
Bancorp. Inc. (Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on September
11, 1996)**
10(b) Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 18,
1996, between USTrust and The First National Bank of
Boston and joined in by Bank of Boston Corporation.
(Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on July 1, 1996)**
10(b)(i) Amendments to the Purchase and Assumption
Agreement between USTrust and The First
National Bank of Boston and joined in by Bank
of Boston Corporation.*
10(c) Definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
August 15, 1996, between the Company and HUBCO, Inc.
(Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 1996)**
10(d) Deferred Compensation Program, as amended to June 16,
1992. (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1992)**
10(e) Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended to May 15, 1990.
(Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1992)**
10(f) Pension Plan, as amended to January 1, 1990. (Exhibit to
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1991)**
10(f)(i) Amendment dated December 20, 1994 to the
Pension Plan as previously amended on January
1, 1990. (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended
December 31, 1994)**
10(f)(ii)Amendment dated February 18, 1997 to the
Pension Plan.*
10(g) Executive Policy Committee Deferred Benefits Plan dated
February 18, 1997.*
10(h) Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended to January 1,
1991. (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1991)**
10(h)(i) December 20, 1994 Amendment to Employee Stock
Ownership Plan. (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year
ended December 31, 1994)**
10(i) Employee Savings Plan (formerly known as Profit-Sharing
Plan), as amended to January 1, 1991. (Exhibit to Form
10-K for year ended December 31, 1991)**
10(i)(i) Amendment, as of January 1, 1994, to Employee
Savings Plan. (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year
ended December 31, 1994)**
10(i)(ii)Amendment effective as of January 1, 1997 to
Employee Savings Plan.*
10(j) 1992 Stock Compensation Plan. (Registration Statement
Nos. 33-54390 and 2-77803)**
10(j)(i) 1992 Stock Compensation Plan as amended and
restated on November 15, 1994. (Exhibit to Form
10-K for year ended December 31, 1994)**
10(k) Dividend Reinvestment Plan, as amended. (Exhibit to
Registration Statement No. 33-38836 on Form S-3.)**
60
10(l) 1989 Directors Stock Option Plan (Exhibit to Form 10-K
for year ended December 31, 1989)**
10(m) 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
(Exhibit to Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of
Stockholders dated April 20, 1995)**
10(m)(i) 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors. (Exhibit to Proxy Statement for
Annual Meeting of Stockholders dated April 19,
1996)**
10(n) Restated and amended Employment Agreement, dated as of
November 21, 1995, between the Company and Neal F.
Finnegan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company. (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December
31, 1995)**
10(n)(i) Amendment effective as of January 1, 1997 to
the Employment Agreement between the Company
and Neal F. Finnegan, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company.*
10(o) Executive Employment Agreements with certain members of
the Company's Executive Policy Committee, dated as of
February 1, 1996:
10(o)(i) Restated Employment Agreement between UST Corp.
and Walter E. Huskins, Executive Vice
President/Administration of the Company
(Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December
31, 1995)**
10(o)(ii)Restated Employment Agreement between UST
Corp. and James K. Hunt, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company (Exhibit to Form 10-K
for year ended December 31, 1995)**
10(o)(iii) Restated Employment Agreement between UST
Corp. and Eric R. Fischer, Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Clerk of the
Company (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended
December 31, 1995)**
10(o)(iv)Restated Employment Agreement between UST
Corp. and Linda J. Lerner, Senior Vice
President/Human Resources of the Company
(Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December
31, 1995)**
10(o)(v) Restated Employment Agreement between UST Corp.
and Kenneth L. Sullivan, Senior Vice
President/Operations of the Company (Exhibit to
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995)**
10(o)(vi)Restated Employment Agreement between UST
Corp. and Katharine C. Armstrong, Executive
Vice President/Commercial Lending of the
Company (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended
December 31, 1995)**
10(o)(vii) Restated Employment Agreement between UST
Corp. and Suzanne Moot, Executive Vice
President/Marketing and Retail Banking of the
Company (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended
December 31, 1995)**
10(o)(viii) Employment Agreement between UST Corp. and
Robert T. McAlear, Executive Vice
President/Controlled Loans and Credit of the
Company (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended
December 31, 1995)**
10(o)(ix)Employment Agreement between UST Corp. and
Kathie S. Stevens, Executive Vice President,
Senior Lending Officer of the Company (Exhibit
to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1995)**
10(o)(x) Amendments to Employment Agreements 10(o)(i)
through 10(o)(ix) dated as of December 17,
1996.*
10(p) Severance Pay Plan, effective January 1, 1995 (Exhibit
to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995)**
10(q) Senior Officer Severance Pay Plan, effective January 1,
1995 (Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1995)**
61
10(r) Asset Management Employment Agreement by and among
Employee/Principals of the Asset Management Division of
the United States Trust Company and United States Trust
Company and UST Corp., effective as of January 1, 1995:
10(r)(i) Employment Agreement among UST Corp, USTC and
Domenic Colasacco, President of USTC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (Exhibit
to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1995)**
10(r)(ii)Employment Agreement among UST Corp., USTC and
Robert A. Lincoln, Senior Vice President,
Senior Portfolio Manager of USTC (Exhibit to
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995)**
10(r)(iii) Employment Agreement among UST Corp., USTC
and Stephen K. Moody, Senior Vice President,
Senior Portfolio Manager of USTC (Exhibit to
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995)**
10(r)(iv)Employment Agreement among UST Corp., USTC and
Lucia B. Santini, Senior Vice
President/Administrator of USTC (Exhibit to
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995)**
10(r)(v) Employment Agreement among UST Corp., USTC and
Robert B. Zevin, Senior Vice President,
Economist and Senior Portfolio Manager of USTC
(Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December
31, 1995)**
10(s) Asset Management Unifying Agreement by and among
Employee/Principals of the Asset Management Division of
the United States Trust Company and United States Trust
Company and UST Corp., effective as of January 1, 1995
(Exhibit to Form 10-K for year ended December 31,
1995)**
10(s)(i) Amendment dated December 31, 1996 to the Asset
Management Unifying Agreement by and among
Employee/Principals of the Asset Management
Division of the United States Trust Company and
United States Trust Company and UST Corp.,
effective as of January 1, 1995.*
(11) Statement re: computation of per share earnings (See Note 1 to
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.)*
(21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant*
(23) Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP*
(27) Article 9 Summary Financial Information for 12 months ended
December 31, 1996*
* Filed herewith.
** Filed as part of a previous Commission filing and incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(d) Exhibits being filed
See Exhibit Index.
(e) Financial Statement Schedules included in Financial Statements.
62
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UST Corp.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
By s/ NEAL F. FINNEGAN By s/ JAMES K. HUNT
------------------------ ----------------------------
Neal F. Finnegan James K. Hunt
President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer) (Principal Financial Officer and
Date: March 18, 1997 Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 18, 1997
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By s/ CHESTER G. ATKINS By s/ SYDNEY L. MILLER
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
Chester G. Atkins, Director Sydney L. Miller, Director
Date: March 18, 1997 Date: March 18, 1997
By s/ DAVID E. BRADBURY By s/ VIKKI L. PRYOR
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
David E. Bradbury, Director Vikki L. Pryor, Director
Date: March 18, 1997 Date: March 18, 1997
By s/ ROBERT M. COARD By s/ GERALD M. RIDGE
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
Robert M. Coard, Director Gerald M. Ridge, Director
Date: March 18, 1997 Date: March 18, 1997
By s/ DOMENIC COLASACCO By s/ WILLIAM SCHWARTZ
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
Domenic Colasacco, Director and William Schwartz, Director
Executive Vice President Date: March 18, 1997
Date: March 18, 1997 By s/ BARBARA C. SIDELL
By s/ ROBERT L. CULVER --------------------------------
-------------------------------- Barbara C. Sidell, Director
Robert L. Culver, Director Date: March 18, 1997
Date: March 18, 1997 By s/ JAMES V. SIDELL
By s/ ALAN K. DERKAZARIAN --------------------------------
-------------------------------- James V. Sidell, Director
Alan K. Derkazarian, Director Date: March 18, 1997
Date: March 18, 1997 By s/ PAUL D. SLATER
By s/ DONALD C. DOLBEN --------------------------------
-------------------------------- Paul D. Slater, Director
Donald C. Dolben, Director Date: March 18, 1997
Date: March 18, 1997 By s/ EDWARD J. SULLIVAN
By s/ NEAL F. FINNEGAN --------------------------------
-------------------------------- Edward J. Sullivan, Director
Neal F. Finnegan, Director Date: March 18, 1997
President and Chief Executive Officer By s/ G. ROBERT TOD
Date: March 18, 1997 --------------------------------
By s/ EDWARD GUZOVSKY G. Robert Tod, Director
-------------------------------- Date: March 18, 1997
Edward Guzovsky, Director By s/ MICHAEL J. VERROCHI
Date: March 18, 1997 --------------------------------
By s/ WALLACE M. HASELTON Michael J. Verrochi, Director
-------------------------------- Date: March 18, 1997
Wallace M. Haselton, Director By s/ GORDON M. WEINER
Date: March 18, 1997 --------------------------------
By s/ BRIAN W. HOTAREK Gordon M. Weiner, Director
-------------------------------- Date: March 18, 1997
Brian W. Hotarek, Director
Date: March 18, 1997
By s/ FRANCIS X. MESSINA
--------------------------------
Francis X. Messina, Director
Date: March 18, 1997
</TABLE>
63
FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION
NO. 04-2436093
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
William Francis Galvin
Secretary of the Commonwealth
One Ashburton Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02108-1512
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
(General Laws, Chapter 156B, Section 72)
We, Neal F. Finnegan, * President
and Eric R. Fischer, * Clerk
of UST Corp.
(Exact name of corporation)
located at: 40 Court Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108
(Street address of corporation in Massachuserts)
certify that these Articles of Amendment affecting articles numbered:
Three (3)
(Number those articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or 6 being amended)
of the Articles of Organization were duly adopted at a meeting held on December
17, 1996, by vote of:
11,344,981 shares of UST Corp. Common Stock of 17,936,989 shares outstanding.
(type, class & series, if any)
par value of $0.625
**being at least a majority of each type, class or series outstanding and
entitled to vote thereon
VOTED: to amend the Corporation's Restated Articles of Organization to
increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation's
Common Stock from 30,000,000 to 45,000,000.
*Delele the inapplicable words. **Delete the inapplicable clause.
1 For amendments adopted pursuant to Chapter 156B, Section 70.
2 For amnendments adopted pursuant to Chapter 156B Section 71.
Note: If the space provided under any article or item on this form is
insufficient, additions shall be set forth on one side only of separate 8 1/2 x
11 sheets of paper with a left margin of at least 1 inch. Additions to more than
one article may be made on a single sheet so long as each article requiring each
addition is clearly indicated.
To change the number of shares and the par value (if any) of any type, class or
series of stock which the corporation is authorized to issue, fill in the
following:
The total presently authorized is:
WITHOUT PAR VALUE STOCKS WITH PAR VALUE STOCKS
TYPE NUMBER OF SHARES TYPE NUMBER OF SHARES PAR VALUE
Common: Common: 30,000,000 $0.625
Preferred: Preferred: 4,000,000 $1.00
(300,000 Series A Junior Participating) @ 1.00
Change the total authorized to:
WITHOUT PAR VALUE STOCKS WITH PAR VALUE STOCKS
TYPE NUMBER OF SHARES TYPE NUMBER OF SHARES PAR VALUE
Common: Common: 45,000,000 $0.625
Preferred: Preferred: 4,000,000 $1.00
(300,000 Series A Junior Participating) @ 1.00
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
(General Laws, Chapter 156B, Section 72)
================================================================================
I hereby approve the within Articles of Amendment, and the filing fee in the
amount of $15,000 having been paid, said article is deemed to have been filed
with me this 27 th day of December, 1996
Effective date:
/s/ William Francis Galvin
WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN
Secretary of the Commonwealth
TO BE FILLED IN BY CORPORATION
Photocopy of document to be sent to:
Eric R. Fischer, Esq.
40 Court Street
Boston, Massachusetts (617) 726-7377
The foregoing amendment(s) will become effective when these Articles of
Amendment are filed in accordance with General Laws, Chapter 156B, Section 6
unless these articles specify, in accordance with the vote adopting the
amendment, a later effective date not more than thirty days after such filing,
in which event the amendment will become effective on such later date.
Later effective date:
SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY, this 27th day of December, 1996
/s/ Neal F. Finnegan *President
- ------------------------------------------------------
Neal F. Finnegan
/s/ Eric R. Fischer *Clerk
- ------------------------------------------------------
Eric R. Fischer, Esq.
*Delete the inapplicable words.
EXHIBIT 10.b.i
The First National Bank of Boston
100 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
As of December 6, 1996
USTrust
40 Court Street
Boston, Massachusetts
Attention: Neal F. Finnegan
President and Chief Executive Officer
Re: Supplemental Loans, Loan Participations and Assignments
-------------------------------------------------------
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is hereby made to that certain Purchase and Assumption
Agreement, dated as of June 18, 1996 (as amended or modified prior to the date
hereof, the "Purchase Agreement"), by and between The First National Bank of
Boston ("FNBB") and USTrust ("UST") and joined in for certain limited purposes
by Bank of Boston Corporation ("BKBC"). Terms defined in the Purchase Agreement
and used without definition herein shall have the same respective meanings
herein as in the Purchase Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, FNBB has agreed, and
BKBC has agreed to cause BayBank, National Association ("BayBank"), (i) to
assign to UST on the BayBank Transfer Date certain interests in Supplemental
Loans (the "Assignments") and (ii) to grant to UST on the BayBank Transfer Date
certain participating interests in Supplemental Loans (the "Participations"), in
each case as more fully set forth in the Purchase Agreement and the Letter
Agreement, dated as of the date hereof, between FNBB and UST relating to the
BayBank Closing (the "BayBank Closing Side Letter"). In connection with such
transactions, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. FNBB hereby agrees to use reasonable efforts for a period of 30
days after the BayBank Transfer Date to obtain the consent of Panametrics, Inc.
in order to change UST's 49% Participation in the Supplemental Loan relating to
Panametrics, Inc. to an Assignment of a 49% interest in such Supplemental Loan
on terms substantially consistent with those contained in the Form of Assignment
and Acceptance attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
- 2 -
2. In the event that FNBB continues to be a lender under the
Supplemental Loan relating to Fire Control Instruments, Inc. ("Fire Control") on
March 9, 1997, then UST's participating interest in such Supplemental Loan shall
be reduced from 100% to 49%; provided, however, that, in connection with such
reduction, FNBB agrees to use reasonable efforts to cause the borrower to
approve a change in UST's 49% Participation to an Assignment of a 49% interest
in such Supplemental Loan. FNBB hereby acknowledges and agrees that its
obligations under the first sentence of the third paragraph of Section 5(a) of
the Letter Agreement, dated as of November 8, 1996, between FNBB and UST
relating to the split closings of the sale of the Branches (the "Split Closing
Side Letter") apply to such Supplemental Loan to Fire Control; provided,
however, that notwithstanding the foregoing the parties hereto hereby agree that
the first sentence of the third paragraph of Section 5(a) of the Split Closing
Side Letter shall not apply to such Supplemental Loan, and FNBB shall not have
any obligation to grant to UST a replacement Assignment or Participation, upon
the repayment or prepayment of such Supplemental Loan from proceeds of a loan or
other extension of credit from UST or any Affiliate of UST.
3. FNBB hereby agrees to use reasonable efforts to determine, as soon
as practicable after the BayBank Transfer Date and in any event within 5
business days after the BayBank Transfer Date, whether the Supplemental Loans
with Ionics, Incorporated and/or Panametrics, Inc. are pledged by FNBB to any
other person or entity. In the event that FNBB determines that either such
Supplemental Loan is so pledged, then FNBB agrees to use reasonable efforts to
terminate such pledge, including, without limitation, substituting collateral
for such pledge. In the event that FNBB terminates such pledge with respect to
either Supplemental Loan, FNBB agrees to promptly notify UST of such
termination. In the event that FNBB is unable to terminate such pledge with
respect to either such Supplemental Loan within 15 business days after the
BayBank Transfer Date (whether by substitution of collateral or otherwise), then
FNBB agrees to repurchase UST's interest in any such Supplemental Loan remaining
pledged and to replace UST's interest in such Supplemental Loan with an interest
in a Replacement Loan (as defined in the applicable Assignment or Participation
agreement) in accordance with the terms of the applicable Assignment or
Participation agreement; provided that, for purposes of determining the timing
of such repurchase and replacement, the date of notice of such repurchase and
replacement shall be deemed to be the last day of the 15 day period referred to
above.
4. FNBB agrees to use reasonable efforts to, as soon as practicable
after the BayBank Closing Date, (a) provide UST with evidence reasonably
acceptable to counsel for UST indicating that the $9,800,000 total commitment
under the
-3-
Supplemental Loan with HoltraChem, Inc. has been duly authorized by HoltraChem,
Inc. and (b) either (i) provide UST with evidence indicating that the maturity
of such Supplemental Loan has been duly extended or (ii) obtain an extension of
the maturity of such Supplemental Loan. In the event that FNBB is unable, within
15 business days after the BayBank Transfer Date (or, if requested by UST within
such 15 business day period, such additional period not to exceed 20 business
days), to (A) provide such evidence of due authorization of the total commitment
under such Supplemental Loan or (B) (i) provide such evidence of due extension
of the maturity of such Supplemental Loan or (ii) if applicable, obtain such
extension, then FNBB agrees to repurchase UST's interest in such Supplemental
Loan and to replace UST's interest in such Supplemental Loan with an interest in
a Replacement Loan (as defined in the applicable Assignment or Participation
agreement) in accordance with the terms of the applicable Assignment or
Participation agreement; provided that, for purposes of determining the timing
of such repurchase and replacement, the date of notice of such repurchase and
replacement shall be deemed to be the last day of the 15 day period (as the same
may be extended as set forth above) referred to above.
The parties further agree that in the event that FNBB is able, within
the 15 day period set forth above (as the same may be extended as set forth
above), to provide such evidence of due authorization and due extension of
maturity or, if applicable, extend such maturity, as described in the foregoing
paragraph, FNBB hereby agrees to use reasonable efforts for a period of 30 days
after the date on which FNBB provides such evidence of due authorization and due
extension of maturity or, if applicable, extend such maturity, to UST to obtain
the consent of HoltraChem, Inc. in order to change UST's 49% Participation in
the Supplemental Loan relating to HoltraChem, Inc. to an Assignment of a 49%
interest in such Supplemental Loan on terms substantially consistent with those
contained in the Form of Assignment and Acceptance attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
5. The parties hereto hereby agree to cooperate with each other in good
faith to enter into, as soon as practicable and in any event within 10 business
days after the BayBank Transfer Date, (a) an Assignment with respect to a 49%
interest in the Supplemental Loan to Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Ariad") and
(b) mutually reasonably satisfactory arrangements, including, without
limitation, documentation reasonably acceptable to counsel to UST and FNBB, with
respect to all outstanding leases between BayBank and Ariad on terms
substantially similar to the terms of such Assignment or, if an assignment would
be prohibited or require the consent of Ariad under the terms of the applicable
lease documents, on terms substantially similar to the terms of the
- 4 -
Participations, in each case, applied in the context of such leases. In the
event that such lease arrangements are not mutually agreed upon following such
good faith efforts, then FNBB agrees to replace such Assignment and such lease
arrangements with an interest in a Replacement Loan (as defined in such
Assignment agreement) in accordance with the terms of such Assignment agreement;
provided that, for purposes of determining the timing of such repurchase and
replacement, the date of notice of such repurchase and replacement shall be
deemed to be the last day of the 10 day period referred to above.
6. FNBB hereby agrees that UST shall be entitled, upon notice to FNBB
no later than 5:00 p.m., Boston time, on the day after the BayBank Transfer
Date, to elect to cause FNBB to repurchase UST's interest in the Supplemental
Loan to RWG Limited Partners, a Massachusetts Limited Partnership ("RWG") if UST
reasonabIy determines that adequate collateral is not or may not in the future
be available for such Supplemental Loan. In the event that UST so elects, FNBB
shall, on the Additional Residential Loan Transfer Date (as defined in the
BayBank Closing Side Letter) repurchase UST's interest in such Supplemental Loan
and transfer to UST residential loans of a type and quality reasonably the same
as the Additional Residentia1 Loans (as defined in the BayBank Closing Side
Letter) having an aggregate outstanding principal amount on such date
approximately equal to UST's share of the outstanding principal amount of the
Supplemental Loan to RWG on such date.
7. The parties hereto hereby agree that, in the event that FNBB
notifies UST by no later than 5:00 p.m., Boston time, on the day after the
BayBank Transfer Date, that it has reasonably determined that any of (a) the
Assignment with respect to Carlton Willard Home, Inc., (b) the Participation
with respect to RWG, or (c) the Participation with respect to Newell Properties,
Inc. are inconsistent with the terms of (i) Section 5(a) of the Split Closing
Side Letter or (ii) the loan documents for the applicable Supplemental Loan,
then the parties shall, as soon as practicable and in any event by close of
business on December 10, 1996, cooperate in good faith to modify such Assignment
or Participation in order to make such arrangements consistent with the terms of
Section 5(a) of the Split Closing Side Letter and the applicable loan documents.
In the event that such modification is not mutually agreed upon following such
good faith efforts, then FNBB agrees to repurchase UST's interest in such
Supplemental Loan and to replace UST's interest in such Supplemental Loan with
an interest in a Replacement Loan (as defined in the applicable Assignment or
Participation agreement) in accordance with the terms of the applicable
Assignment or Participation agreement; provided that, for purposes of
determining the timing of such repurchase and replacement, the date of notice of
such repurchase and
-5-
replacement shall be deemed to be the date which is 10 business days after the
BayBank Transfer Date.
8. FNBB agrees to deliver to USTrust, by no later than 5:00 p.m.,
Boston time, on the day after the BayBank Transfer Date, the Attached Loan
Documents (as defined in the applicable Participation or Assignment agreement)
for (a) its Assignment with respect to Carlton Willard Home, Inc., (b) its
Participation with respect to RWG, and (c) its Participation with respect to
Newell Properties, Inc. The parties hereto hereby agree that FNBB's failure to
deliver such Attached Loan Documents prior to such time shall not be deemed to
be a violation of the terms of the applicable Participation or Assignment.
This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
which shall together constitute but one and the same agreement. This letter
agreement shall for all purposes be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the internal laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This letter
agreement shall take effect as a sealed instrument as of the date first herein
above written, shall be binding on the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns.
- 6 -
Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing the
enclosed copy of this letter in the place provided below.
Very truly yours,
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON
By: /s/ William M. Parent
-----------------------
Title:
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
USTRUST
By:
------------------------
Title:
The undersigned hereby joins this Letter
Agreement for the sole purpose of
agreeing to cause the Assets and the
Assumed Liabilities to be transferred to
UST in accordance with the terms and
provisions of this Letter Agreement and
the Purchase Agreement.
BANK OF BOSTON CORPORATION
By: /s/ Peter J. Manning
-----------------------
Title:
-6-
Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing the
enclosed copy of this letter in the place provided below.
Very truly yours,
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON
By:
----------------------
Title:
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
USTRUST
By: /s/ Eric R. Fischer
------------------------------
Title: Executive Vice President
The undersigned hereby joins this Letter
Agreement for the sole purpose of
agreeing to cause the Assets and the
Assumed Liabilities to be transferred to
UST in accordance with the terms and
provisions of this Letter Agreement and
the Purchase Agreement.
BANK OF BOSTON CORPORATION
By:
-----------------------------
Title:
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON
100 Federal Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Dated as of November 8, 1996
USTrust
40 Court Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02108
Attention: Neal F. Finnegan
President and Chief Executive Offcer
Re: Amendments to Purchase and Assumption Agreement
-----------------------------------------------
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of
June 18, 1996 (the "Purchase Agreement"), by and between USTrust, a
Massachusetts trust company ("UST"), and The First National Bank of Boston, a
national banking association ("FNBB"), and joined in for certain limited
purposes by Bank of Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation. Capitalized
terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned
thereto in the Purchase Agreement or in a letter agreement between the parties
relating to the closing arrangements for the purchase of the Branches of even
date herewith.
The parties hereto hereby agree to amend the terms of the Purchase
Agreement as follows:
1. Additional Definitions. Section 1.1 of the Purchase Agreement is hereby
amended by inserting, in the appropriate places designated by alphabetical
order, the following new definitions:
"Merchant Credit Card Services" shall mean the so-called "Merchant
Credit Card" services provided to Branch Customers at the Branches.
"Night Deposit Services" shall mean services relating to night
deposits at the Branches.
"Silver Storage Agreements" shall mean those agreements relating to
so-called "silver storage" services at the Branches.
- 2 -
"Wire Transfer Services" shall mean services provided to Branch
Customers relating to wire transfers from the Branches.
2. Amendments to Section 1.1 of the Purchase Agreement. Section 1.1 of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by:
(i) amending the definition of "Excluded Deposits", by deleting
the word "and" at the end of clause (f), inserting,
immediately before the period at the end of clause (g), the
word "and" and the following new language:
(h) deposits which are booked or allocated to the Branches
owned by FNBB and were established by an "employer" pursuant
to a Keogh Plan. Seller acknowledges and agrees that Excluded
Deposits shall be excluded from the Deposit Liabilities for
purposes of calculating the 7% amount pursuant to Section
3.1(a) hereof at all times during the period referred to
therein.
(ii) amending the definition of "Related Commercial Products and Services",
by inserting, immediately after the phrase "relating to the Commercial
Loans" in the second line thereof, the following new phrase, "and,
regardless of whether such services are related to Commercial Loans,
all Merchant Credit Card Services, Night Deposit Services and Wire
Transfer Services"; and
(iii) amending the definition of "Safe Deposit Agreements", by inserting,
immediately after the word "Branches", the following new phrase, "and
Silver Storage Agreements".
3. Amendment to Section 3.3(a) of the Purchase Agreement. Section 3.3(a) of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
thereof:
The parties agree that Arthur Andersen LLP may act as
Purchaser's agent for purposes of verifying the Purchase Price
and Deposit Liabilities determination in accordance with this
section and shall have the same access to such work papers,
schedules and other supporting data of FNBB or BayBank with
respect to the Branches as Purchaser is entitled to for
purposes of such verification.
- 3 -
4. Amendment to Section 3.3(b) of the Purchase Agreement. Section 3.3(b) of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the word "fifteenth" in the
first line thereof and substituting the word "twentieth" in place thereof.
5. Amendment to Section 3.5(b) of the Purchase Agreement. Section 3.5(b) of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the word "and" at the end of
clause (vi) and adding the word "and" at the end of clause (vii) and adding the
following new clause (viii):
(viii) Periodic fees related to the Assets and Assumed
Liabilities, including lock box fees, letter of credit annual
fees and credit line annual fees.
6. Amendment to Section 3.6 of the Purchase Agreement. Section 3.6 of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by inserting a period after the words "the
provisions of this Agreement" in the third line thereof and deleting the
remainder of Section 3.6 in its entirety.
7. Amendment to Section 10.3(e) of the Purchase Agreement. The date "August 31,
1996" in Section 10.3(e) of the Purchase Agreement is hereby deleted and the
date "November 8, 1996" is hereby substituted in place thereof; provided,
however, that with respect to the West Roxbury Branch lease and the Third
Avenue, Waltham Branch lease, the date referred to in Section 10.3(e) shall
continue to be extended by the parties beyond November 8, 1996, until the
BayBank Closing Date, provided that there is a reasonable likelihood that FNBB
will obtain the consents of the landlords with respect to such Branch
properties.
8. Amendment to Section l5.2(a) of the Purchase Agreement. Section 15.2(a) of
the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "12.4"
therein and substituting "16.2" in place thereof.
9. Amendment to Section 15.8 of the Purchase Agreement. Section 15.8 of the
Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by inserting, immediately before the period
at the end of the first sentence thereof, a semicolon and the following new
phrase:
provided, however, that this Section 15.8 shall not apply to
any negative Deposit to the extent that, on the Transfer Date,
Seller transfers to Purchaser (i) positive Deposit Liabilities
eligible for offset against such negative Deposits or (ii) a
credit line which would permit drawings, in the amount of the
negative Deposit by the applicable Branch Customers; and
provided further, that the deposit premium calculated pursuant
to Section 3.1(a) hereof shall be reduced to reflect any such
reduction in such positive Deposit Liabilities in accordance
with this Section 15.8.
- 4 -
10. Amendment to Annex A to the Purchase Agreement. Paragraph 2 of Annex A to
the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence of
Paragraph 2 in its entirety and inserting the following new sentence in place
thereof:
"Purchaser and Seller agree that, at Seller's expense (for the
increase and incremental employment taxes attributable to the
increase), the retention bonus shall be increased by 1.7% of
the base amount specified above, resulting in a total
retention bonus of 10% of such base amount."
11. Certain Transferred Deposits. UST acknowledges and agrees that, with its
knowledge and consent at the request of the applicable Branch Customer, or as
otherwise agreed to by the parties based on the fact that a customer has
relocated from the market area of the Branches or has a "home banking"
relationship with FNBB or BayBank, certain Deposits have been transferred by
FNBB and BayBank from the Branches to other bank branches of FNBB and BayBank
not being acquired by UST (all such deposit accounts delivered hereinafter
referred to as "Transferred Deposits"). UST acknowledges and agrees that such
transfers shall be deemed not to have been made in violation of the Purchase
Agreement. FNBB acknowledges and agrees that such Transferred Deposits shall be
excluded from the Deposit Liabilities for purposes of calculating the 7% amount
pursuant to Section 3.1(a) of the Purchase Agreement at all times during the
period referred to therein. As of the date hereof, FNBB represents that such
Transferred Deposits have not in the aggregate exceeded $8,000,000. FNBB and UST
also acknowledge and agree that, for purposes of calculating the 7% amount
pursuant to Section 3.1 (a) of the Purchase Agreement, the Deposit Liabilities
shall at all times during the period referred to therein include Deposit
Liabilities in accounts that have been or are transferred by FNBB or BayBank
into the Branches prior to the applicable Transfer Date.
12. Certain Related Comercial Products and Services. The parties acknowledge and
agree that certain accounts relating to (i) repurchase agreements with certain
customers of FNBB, having an aggregate balance of approximately $3 million as of
the date hereof and (ii) sweep arrangements with Commercial Loan customers known
as "BayBank Precision Sweep Accounts" maintained or allocated by BayBank at the
BayBank Branches, and having an aggregate balance of approximately $60 million
as of the date hereof, constitute Related Commercial Products and Services for
purposes of the Purchase Agreement and will be transferred to UST, together with
an amount equal to the aggregate amount due to such customers with respect to
such agreements and accounts, on the FNBB or BayBank Transfer Date, as
applicable; provided, however, that such repurchase agreements and BayBank
Precision Sweep Accounts shall not be deemed Deposit Liabilities for purposes of
computing the 7% amount under Section 3.1(a) of the Purchase Agreement and for
purposes of Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of the Purchase Agreement.
- 5 -
13. Agreements as to Certain Branch Leases. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in the Purchase Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows:
(i) West Roxburv Branch Lease. The parties hereby agree that (a) FNBB
shall assign and UST shall accept the Branch Lease for the BayBank
Branch located in West Roxbury and (b) the Purchase Price shall be
reduced by an amount equal to [$69,436.19], the present value of
one-half of the additional rental payments required by the landlord
after the BayBank Closing Date for the remainder of the current lease
term.
(ii) Third Avenue, Waltham Branch Lease. The parties hereby agree that
the Branch Lease for the BayBank Branch located at Third Avenue,
Waltham includes the lease of the office space located on the second
and third floors of the Third Avenue, Waltham Branch (the "Second and
Third Floor Lease") and that (a) FNBB shall assign and UST shall accept
the Third Avenue, Waltham Branch Lease, including the Second and Third
Floor Lease, (b) the Purchase Price shall be reduced by an amount equal
to $610,079.22, one-half the present value of the rental payments
required to be paid from the BayBank Closing Date for the remainder of
the current lease term for the Second and Third Floor Lease and (c)
after the Bay Bank Closing Date, UST shall, upon receipt thereof (in
the case of a sublease) or at the end of each month (in the case of use
by UST), pay FNBB an amount which is equal to one-half of any rental
payments received by UST if the Second and Third Floor Lease is
subleased to a third party or one-half of the fair market value, taking
into account the nature of any such utilization (e.g. retail, office or
storage) of the rental of that portion of the Second and Third Floor
Lease space, if any, utilized by UST or any of its Affiliates. UST
agrees to obtain the consent of FNBB prior to making any alterations or
improvements with respect to the Second and Third Floor Lease space
which consent, unless the alterations or improvements are made at any
time when the remaining term on the Second and Third Floor Lease is
less than two years and would result in an expense to FNBB pursuant to
the immediately succeeding sentence of an amount in excess of the
amount of the aggregate yearly rent under such lease, shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed. In the event that, with the consent
of FNBB, UST makes alterations or improvements to the Second and Third
Floor Lease space in connection with any sublease of such space to a
third party, FNBB agrees to reimburse UST for one-half of the expenses
incurred by UST in connection therewith (net of any portion of such
expenses paid by any other Person such as the owner of the sublease of
such space).
14. Agreement as to Certain "ATM Surrounds". Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in the Purchase Agreement, the parties hereby agree that FNBB shall be
entitled, at its own expense, to remove all "surrounds" from the ATMs located at
the Branches; provided, however, that FNBB hereby agrees not to remove such
surrounds until the expiration of the ninety day period following the FNBB
Transfer Date, as applicable, or a
- 6 -
reasonable time thereafter to permit UST to replace such "ATM Surrounds" at the
Branches; and provided further, that (i) upon the removal of any such "ATM
Surround" by FNBB from any Branch subject to a Branch Lease, UST shall promptly
replace such "ATM Surround," and (ii) to the extent any landlord consent is
required for such removal of any "ATM Surrounds", FNBB shall, at its expense,
obtain such consents and UST shall use reasonable efforts to assist FNBB in
obtaining such consents.
15. Agreement as to Branch Closing Times. The parties hereby agree that the
closing of banking business to the public at the FNBB Branches and the ATMs at
the FNBB Branches on the FNBB Closing Date shall be 4 p.m. and approximately 3
p.m., respectively. The parties hereby agree that the closing of banking
business to the public at the BayBank Branches and ATMs at the BayBank Branches
shall be 4 p.m. and 4 p.m., respectively.
16. Waiver of certain Purchaser Covenant in Section 15.2(a) of the Purchase
Agreement. FNBB acknowledges and agrees that UST shall distribute within three
(3) business days after the Closing to customers of FNBB whose deposit accounts
are being transferred to UST, an initial supply of new basic checks, deposit
tickets or other similar instruments and ATM cards. FNBB acknowledges and agrees
that the failure by UST to deliver such items at least seven (7) days prior to
the Transfer Date as prescribed by the Purchase Agreement shall not be deemed to
be a violation of the Purchase Agreement.
17. Agreement as to Merchant Credit Card Machines. FNBB hereby agrees to use all
reasonable efforts to cause BayBank to transfer to UST all of BayBank's interest
in certain Merchant Credit Card machines owned or leased by BayBank, in each
case at a price to be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto.
18. Cash Management Services. Simultaneously herewith, the parties hereto are
entering into a Cash Management Services Agreement, pursuant to which FNBB has
agreed to provide certain cash management services to UST after the FNBB Closing
Date.
19. Advance Accounts. Notwithstanding anything in the Purchase Agreement to the
contrary, the parties hereto hereby agree that FNBB and BayBank may transfer out
of the applicable Branches to other branches of FNBB or BayBank not being
acquired by UST, any overdraft lines of credit which are more than sixty (60)
days delinquent, together with the deposit account to which such overdraft line
of credit relates. The parties acknowledge and agree that such transfers shall
be deemed not to have been made in violation of the terms of the Purchase
Agreement. FNBB acknowledges and agrees that deposit accounts transferred
pursuant to this Paragraph 19 shall be excluded from the Deposit Liabilities for
purposes of calculating the 7% amount pursuant to Section 3. l(a) of the
Purchase Agreement at all times during the period referred to therein.
-7-
20. Certain Leased Equipment. Simultaneously herewith, BancBoston Leasing Inc.
is selling and UST Leasing Corporation is purchasing certain equipment owned by
BancBoston Leasing Inc. and leased to certain Commercial Loan customers.
21. Nonsolicitation Guidelines. Subsection (c) of the third sentence of Section
10.4 of the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such subsection in
its entirety and inserting the following new subsection (c) in place thereof:
(c) respond to, or offer FNBB or BayBank products and for services to,
Branch Customers, including, without limitation, Branch Customers who
retain deposit accounts at FNBB or BayBank after the FNBB or BayBank
Transfer Date ("Split Customers") during or in response to unsolicited
in-person or telephonic inquiries by Branch Customers or Split
Customers with respect to banking or other financial services,
including without limitation, Commercial Loans; and
22. Agreement as to Certain Transitional Matters. Notwithstanding anything in
the Purchase Agreement to the contrary, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows with respect to certain Deposit histories of the Branch Customers:
(i) In the case of any bona fide dispute between a Branch Customer and
UST concerning the servicing of a Deposit account by FNBB or BayBank
relative to the period prior to the transfer of such account to UST,
FNBB will provide or cause BayBank to provide to UST, at FNBB's or
BayBank's expense, as applicable, to the extent reasonably requested
and available, information and copies of documents relating to such
Deposit account in a timely manner which would comply with standard
banking practices and customs. UST agrees that it shall reimburse FNBB
or BayBank, as applicable, for all direct costs incurred by such
persons in connection with providing such information and/or copies to
the extent that UST would customarily charge a fee to the Branch
Customer in connection with UST's providing such information and/or
copies;
(ii) In the event that UST receives a subpoena or is otherwise
requested pursuant to legal process or judicial or administrative
proceedings to provide information and/or documents relating to the
servicing of a Deposit account by FNBB or BayBank prior to the transfer
of such account to UST, UST shall request that the party requesting
such information subpoena or request by legal process or judicial or
administrative proceedings that FNBB or BayBank, as applicable, provide
such information or documentation. In the event that the requesting
party refuses or is unable to subpoena or otherwise make such request
to FNBB or BayBank directly, then, at the request of UST, FNBB will
provide or cause BayBank to provide, at
- 8 -
FNBB's or BayBank's own expense, to the extent available, such
information or documentation in a timely manner which would comply with
standard banking practices and customs; and
(iii) In the case of any inquiry by a Branch Customer relating to the
servicing of a Deposit account by FNBB or BayBank prior to the transfer
of such account to UST (but not relating to a bona fide dispute between
such Branch Customer and UST), or otherwise upon request by UST (except
to the extent provided in paragraphs (i) and (ii) above), FNBB agrees
to provide UST, to the extent reasonably requested and available, with
information and copies of pertinent documents relating to such account
in a timely manner which would comply with standard banking practices
and customs, and UST agrees to reimburse FNBB for FNBB's direct
expenses incurred in providing any such information and/or copies of
documents.
23. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and
conditions of the Purchase Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
remain in full force and effect, and each party hereto expressly affirms all of
its obligations under the Purchase Agreement. This Letter Agreement may be
executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and
the same agreement, and this Letter Agreement shall become effective when one or
more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties hereto. This Letter
Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of The
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (without reference to conflicts or choice of law
provisions).
- 9 -
Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing the
enclosed copy of this letter in the place provided below.
Very truly yours,
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON
By: /s/ William M. Parent
-------------------------
Title:
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
USTRUST
By: /s/ James K. Hunt
------------------
Title:
The undersigned hereby joins this Letter
Agreement for the sole purpose of
agreeing to cause the Assets and the
Assumed Liabilities to be transferred to
UST in accordance with the terms and
provisions of this Letter Agreement and
the Purchase Agreement.
BANK OF BOSTON CORPORATION
By: /s/ Peter J. Manning
---------------------
Title:
EXHIBIT 10(f)(ii)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
UST CORP. PENSION PLAN
WHEREAS, The UST Corp. Pension Plan (the "Plan") was amended and restated
effective July 1, 1996; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.1 of the Plan gives UST Corp. (the "Employer") the authority
to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan effective January 1, 1997 to (a)
improve early retirement benefits and (b) reflect former BayBank and Bank of
Boston employees.
NOW, THEREFORIE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1. Section 2.3 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"2.3 "VESTING SERVICE" means the Participant's Years of Service, excluding
years prior to the Plan Year in which the Employee attained the age of
18.
For purposes of determining Vesting Service, Service shall include employment
with the following entities provided the Employee was employed by an Employer on
the date the entity became an Affiliated Employer:
(a) Bank of Boston;
(b) BayBank;
(c) Charlesbank Trust Company;
(d) Citibank and Trust Company;
(e) Gloucester National Bank of Gloucester;
(f) Homeowners Savings Bank;
(g) Natick Trust Company;
(h) Neponset Valley Bank; and
(i) Valley Bank and Trust."
2. Section 2.4 is hereby amended by inserting the following at the beginning of
the table:
FIRST CALENDAR YEAR
ENTITY FOR BENEFIT SERVICE
------ -------------------
"Bank of Boston 1997
BayBank 1997"
-1 -
3. The first paragraph of Section 4.2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"A Participant's annual benefit under the Regular Formula is equal to the
excess of (a) over (b), the result multiplied by (c), where
(a) is 50% of the Participant's Average Final Pay,
(b) is 50% of the Participant's Social Security Credit, and
(c) is a fraction not to exceed one, whose numerator is the number of the
Participant's years of Benefit Service and whose denominator is 25,
provided that if the Participant has not attained age 55 on the date of
determination, the denominator shall be the greater of 25 and the
projected number of years of Benefit Service at his Normal Retirement
Date.
4. Section 6.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"6.2 EARLY RETIREMENT BENEFIT
The benefit payable to a Participant who retires prior to his Normal
Retirement Date shall be equal to his Accrued Benefit reduced by 5/12ths
of 1% for each month that benefits commence prior to his Normal
Retirement Date."
5. Section 8.3 is hereby amended by replacing the last sentence with the
following:
"In such event the benefit payable shall be his Accrued Benefit reduced for
early commencement in accordance with Section 6.2. "
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed by its
duly elected officer this 18th day of February, 1997.
UST CORP.
By: /s/ Eric R. Fischer
-------------------
-2 -
EXHIBIT 10(g)
UST CORP.
EXECUTIVE POLICY COMMITTEE PLAN
January, 1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I - NAME, PURPOSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE
1.01 Name and Purpose 1
1.02 Effective Date 1
ARTICLE II - DEFINITIONS
2.01 Accrued Benefit 2
2.02 Actuarial Equivalent 2
2.03 Board 2
2.04 Change of Control 2
2.05 Code 2
2.06 Committee 2
2.07 Compensation 2
2.08 Credited Service 2
2.09 Deferred Retirement Date 3
2.10 Early Retirement Date 3
2.11 Effective Date 3
2.12 Employee 3
2.13 Employer 3
2.14 Final Average Compensation 3
2.15 Normal Retirement Date 3
2.16 Participant 3
2.17 Plan 3
2.18 Qualified Plan 3
2.19 Qualified Plan Benefit 3
2.20 Social Security Benefit 3
2.21 Social Security Relirement Age 4
2.22 Supplemental Plan 4
2.23 Supplemental Plan Benefit 4
ARTICLE III - NORMAL AND DEFERRED RETIREMENT BENEFITS
3.01 Benefit Upon Normal Retirement 5
3.02 Benefit Upon Deferred Retirement 5
ARTICLE IV - EARLY RETIREMENT BENEFITS
4.01 Benefit Upon Early Retirement 6
4.02 Amount of Early Retirement Benefit 6
4.03 Commencement Date 6
ARTICLE V - DEATH BENEFITS
5.01 Death of a Participant Prior to Commencement Date 7
5.02 Death of a Participant After Commencement Date 7
ARTICLE VI - DISABILITY
6.01 Disability Defined 8
6.02 Disability Benefits 8
ARTICLE VII - FORM OF PAYMENT
7.01 Unmarried Participants 9
7.02 Married Participants 9
ARTICLE VIII - FUNDING
8.01 Funding 10
ARTICLE IX - ADMINISTRATION
9.01 Duties of the Committee 11
9.02 Finality of Decisions 11
9.03 Expenses of Administration 11
ARTICLE X - MISCELLANEOUS
10.01 Non-Guarantee of Employment 12
10.02 Rights under Plan 12
10.03 Amendments/Termination 12
10.04 Nonassignability 12
10.05 Claims Procedure 12
10.06 Entire Agreement: Successors 13
10.07 Change of Control 13
10.08 Successor Employer 13
10.09 Forfeiture 13
10.10 Governing Law 14
ARTICLE I
NAME, PURPOSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE
1.01 NAME AND PURPOSE
The plan set forth herein shall be known as the UST Corp. Executive Policy
Committee Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan, which is unfunded, was established,
and shall be maintained, solely for the purpose of providing deferred
compensation to a select group of management or highly compensated
employees within the meaning of Sections 201(2), 301(a), and 401(a)(1) of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and shall
be administered in a manner consistent with that intent. The plan is
sponsored by UST Corp.
1.02 EFFECTIVE DATE
The Plan's effective date is January 1, 1997. This Plan shall apply to
Participants who retire or whose employment with the Employer terminates on
or after January 1, 1997.
- 1 -
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
When used herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings unless a
different meaning is clearly required by the context of the Plan:
2.01 "Accrued Benefit" shall mean a monthly benefit payable in the normal
form of annuity commencing on the Participant's Normal Retirement
Date, or Deferred Retirement Date if applicable, which is equal to an
amount calculated in accordance with Section 3.01.
2.02 "Actuarial Equivalent" means a benefit of equivalent actuarial value,
using the actuarial assumptions set forth in the Qualified Plan.
2.03 "Board" or "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of UST
Corp.
2.04 "Change of Control" shall mean a Change of Control as that term is
defined in the Employer's Stock Compensation Plan.
2.05 "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
2.06 "Committee" means the committee designated by the Board of Directors
to administer the Plan.
2.07 "Compensation," with respect to any calendar year in which the
Participant earns Credited Service, shall mean the Participant's base
pay, bonuses and commissions. For purposes of determining compensation
for a calendar year, payments made under a bonus plan shall be
attributed to the year earned. Compensation shall not include:
(a) amounts payable under any long-term incentive plan,
(b) insurance premiums or benefits,
(c) relocation expenses, or
(d) special contractual agreements not deemed to be part of a
Participant's usual compensation.
2.08 "Credited Service" shall mean the Participant's period of employment
with the Employer, measured in years and months. One month of Credited
Service is earned in each calendar month that the Participant is
employed for one or more days.
- 2 -
2.09 "Deferred Retirement Date" shall mean a Participant's actual retirement
date, if the Participant remains in active service after his Normal
Retirement Date.
2.10 "Early Retirement Date" shall mean the date on which a Participant
retires from the employ of the Employer, if such date is before the
date the Participant reaches Normal Retirement Date yet after the date
the Participant has attained age 55 and has completed 5 years of
Credited Service.
2.11 "Effective Date" of the Plan shall be January 1, 1997.
2.12 "Employee" means any person employed by the Employer.
2.13 "Employer" means UST Corp. and any subsidiary and/or affiliated
corporation which has adopted this Plan.
2.14 "Final Average Compensation" shall mean Compensation averaged over the
5 consecutive calendar years within the last 10 years of Credited
Service immediately preceding his termination date which produce the
highest such average. If an Employee has Compensation in fewer than 5
complete consecutive calendar years, Compensation shall be averaged
over the total number of complete consecutive calendar years, unless
using a partial calendar year as a complete calendar year would
increase the average.
2.15 "Normal Retirement Date" shall mean the first day of the month
coincident with or next following the date a Participant has attained
age 62 and completed 5 years of Credited Service.
2.16 "Participant" means any Employee or former Employee who is a member of
the Executive Policy Committee, excluding Domenic Colassaco.
2.17 "Plan" means the UST Corp. Executive Policy Committee Plan.
2.18 "Qualified Plan" means the UST Corp. Pension Plan.
2.19 "Qualified Plan Benefit" shall mean the annual amount of pension
benefit under the Qualified Plan assuming:
(a) payments commence on the first of the month coincident with or
next following actual retirement under this Plan and
(b) payments are in the form of a single life annuity.
-3-
2.20 "Social Security Benefit" shall mean the annual Primary Insurance
Amount, which reflects any reduction for commencement prior to a
Participant's Social Security Retirement Age or any delayed retirement
credit for commencement after his Social Security Retirement Age, as
determined under the Social Security Act in effect on the January 1
preceding the date benefits commence (or such other date specified by
the Plan), and based upon the following assumptions:
(a) the Participant had no earnings during the calendar year which
includes the date his employment with the Employer terminates,
or in any subsequent calendar year;
(b) the Participant's earnings in each prior year are equal to the
maximum amount of wages subject to old age survivor and
disability insurance tax under the Federal Insurance Act;
(c) benefits commence on the first of the month coincident with or
next following actual retirement date; and
(d) if the Participant's benefit commencement date precedes the
Participant's Social Security Retirement Age, the Social
Security Benefit otherwise payable at Social Security
Retirement Age shall be reduced by
(i) 5/9ths of 1% for each of the first 36 months that
benefit commencement precedes Social Security
Retirement Age plus
(ii) 5/12ths of 1% for each month in excess of 36 months
that benefit commencement precedes Social Security
Retirement Age.
2.21 "Social Security Retirement Age" means the earliest age at which
unreduced benefits are payable from the Social Security Administration.
2.22 "Supplemental Plan" means the UST Corp. Supplemental Retirement
Benefits Plan.
2.23 "Supplemental Plan Benefit" means the benefit payable under the UST
Corp. Supplemental Retirement Benefits Plan, assuming
(a) payments commence on the first of the month coincident with or
next following actual retirement under this Plan and
(b) payments are in the form of a single life annuity.
- 4 -
ARTICLE III
NORMAL AND DEFERRED RETIREMENT BENEFITS
3.01 BENEFIT UPON NORMAL RETIREMENT
Upon reaching Normal Retirement Date, a Participant may retire from the
employ of the Employer and shall be entitled to receive a lifetime
monthly "Normal Retirement Benefit" (also referred to as the Accrued
Benefit) commencing on his Normal Retirement Date. The Participant's
monthly Normal Retirement Benefit shall be equal to one-twelfth of the
"Target Benefit" reduced by the sum of:
(a) his Qualified Plan Benefit; plus
(b) his Supplemental Plan Benefit; plus
(c) his Social Security Benefit.
Changes to a Participant's Qualified Plan Benefit, Supplemental Plan
Benefit, or Social Security Benefit which occur after the date of the
Participant's termination of employment shall not be reflected in the
determination of benefits payable from this Plan.
The "Target Benefit" is equal to 50% of his Final Average Compensation
multiplied by the ratio (not to exceed 1.0) of the Participant's
Credited Service divided by 20.
3.02 BENEFIT UPON DEFERRED RETIRIEMENT
Upon retiring on a Deferred Retirement Date, a Participant shall be
entitled to receive a benefit commencing on the first day of the month
coincident with or next following the Participant's Deferred Retirement
Date and continuing monthly for the lifetime of the Participant. The
amount of such benefit shall be equal to the amount otherwise payable
under Section 3.01 based on the Participant's Final Average
Compensation, Credited Service, Qualified Plan Benefit, Supplemental
Plan Benefit, and Social Security Benefit determined as of the
Participant's Deferred Retirement Date.
- 5 -
ARTICLE IV
EARLY RETIREMENT BENEFITS
4.01 BENEFIT UPON EARLY RETIREMENT
If a Participant terminates employment on or after his Early Retirement
Date, but prior to his Normal Retirement Date, and any of conditions
(a), (b) or (c) immediately below apply, he shall be entitled to a
lifetime monthly "Early Retirement Benefit" as described in Section
4.02 below:
(a) his termination of employment was involuntary,
(b) his retirement was requested by the Board, or
(c) his retirement has the consent of the Board.
4.02 AMOUNT OF EARLY RETIREMENT BENEFIT
The amount of the Participant's Early Retirement Benefit shall be equal
to the Target Benefit, as determined in accordance with the provisions
of Section 3.01; multiplied by the fraction shown below to reflect the
early commencement of benefits; and reduced by the sum of the Qualified
Plan Benefit, Supplemental Plan Benefit, and Social Security Benefit.
AGE AT RETIREMENT FACTOR
62 100%
61 95%
60 9o%
59 85%
58 80%
57 75%
56 70%
55 65%
(interpolated on a straight line basis for fractional ages)
4.03 COMMENCEMENT DATE
The Participant's Early Retirement Benefit shall commence on the first
day of the month coincident with or next following the Participant's
Early Retirement Date.
- 6 -
ARTICLE V
DEATH BENEFITS
5.01 DEATH OF PARTICIPANT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF BENEFITS
If a Participant who has been married for at least one year dies after
completing 5 years of Credited Service, but prior to the date his
benefits under this Plan commence, his Surviving Spouse shall be
eligible to receive a monthly lifetime benefit commencing on the first
day of the month following the later of the Participant's 55th birthday
and the Participant's death. The benefit payable to his Surviving
Spouse shall be equal to 50% of the benefit the Participant accrued
based upon his Target Benefit, Qualified Plan Benefit, Supplemental
Plan Benefit, and Social Security Benefit determined as of the date of
his death. The Target Benefit shall be reduced for early commencement
(based upon the Participant's age at commencement) in accordance with
the factors set forth in Section 4.02.
5.02 DEATH OF PARTICIPANT AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF BENEFITS
If a Participant dies after the commencement of his benefits under this
Plan, no death benefit will be payable hereunder except as otherwise
provided under the form of annuity payment in effect on the date of
death.
- 7 -
ARTICLE VI
DISABILITY
6.01 DISABILITY DEFINED
For purposes of this Plan, a Participant shall be deemed to be disabled
if he is eligible for and receiving benefits under an
Employer-sponsored Long-Term Disability plan.
6.02 DISABILITY BENEFITS
No benefits shall be payable hereunder solely on account of disability.
However, if a Participant is deemed to be disabled under Seetion 6.01,
he shall continue to accrue Credited Service until the earliest of the
following events:
(a) the Participant attains his Normal Retirement Date;
(b) the Participant dies;
(c) the Participant ceases to be disabled;
(d) the Participant terminates employment for any other reason.
The Participant's Compensation during the period of disability shall,
for purposes of this Plan, be deemed to be equal to the Participant's
Compensation for the most recent complete calendar year of employment.
- 8 -
ARTICLE VII
FORM OF PAYMENT
7.01 UNMARRIED PARTICIPANTS
The form of payment under this Plan for an unmarried Participant or a
Participant who has been married for less than one year on the date his
employment terminates is a single life annuity: a benefit payable
monthly for the lifetime of the Participant, the first payment to be
due on the date specified in Section 3 or 4 hereof, and the last
payment to be due on the first day of the calendar month in which death
occurs.
7.02 MARRIED PARTICIPANTS
The form of payment under this Plan for a Participant who has been
married for at least one year on the date his employment terminates is
a joint and contingent annuity, which is a benefit payable monthly for
the lifetime of the Participant with a benefit equal to 50% of such
benefit payable monthly to the surviving spouse for the lifetime of the
spouse. The amount of the monthly benefit payable as a joint and
contingent annuity is the Actuarial Equivalent of the monthly benefit
payable as a single life annuity.
-9-
ARTICLE VIII
FUNDING
8.01 FUNDING
There is no fund associated with this Plan. The Employer shall be
required to make payments only as benefits become due and payable under
the Plan. No person shall have any right, other than the right of an
unsecured general creditor, against the Employer with respect to the
benefits payable hereunder, or which may be payable hereunder, to any
Participant, surviving spouse or beneficiary hereunder. If the
Employer, acting in its sole discretion, establishes a reserve or other
fund associated with this Plan, no person shall have any right to or
interest in any specific amount or asset of such reserve or fund by
reason of amounts which may be payable to such person under this Plan,
nor shall such person have any right to receive any payment under this
Plan except as and to the extent expressly provided in this Plan. The
assets in any such reserve or fund shall be subject to the control of
the Employer and need not be used to pay benefits hereunder.
- 10-
ARTICLE IX
ADMINISTRATION
9.01 DUTIES OF THE COMMITTEE
The Plan shall be administered by the Committee in accordance with its
terms and purposes. The Committee shall determine the amount and manner
of payment of the benefits due to or on behalf of each Participant from
the Plan and shall cause them to be paid by the Employer accordingly.
9.02 FINALITY OF DECISIONS
The Committee expressly is granted, without intending any limitation,
the discretion to construe the terms of the Plan and to determine
eligibility for benefits hereunder. The decisions made by and the
actions taken by the Committee in the administration of the Plan shall
be final and conclusive on all persons, and neither the Committee nor
the Employer shall be subject to individual liability with respect to
the Plan.
9.03 EXPENSES OF ADMINISTRATION
All expenses incurred in connection with the execution of this Plan and
in carrying out the provisions hereof shall be paid by the Employer.
-11-
ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS
10.01 NON-GUARANTEE OF EMPLOYMENT
Nothing contained in the Plan shall be construed as a contract of
employment between the Employer and any Participant, or as a right of
any such Participant to be continued in the employment of the Employer,
or as a limitation on the right of the Employer to deal with any
Participant, as to his/her hiring, discharge, layoff, compensation, and
all other conditions of employment in all respects as though the Plan
did not exist.
10.02 RIGHTS UNDER PLAN
Nothing in the Plan shall be construed to limit, broaden, restrict, or
grant any right to a Participant, surviving spouse or any beneficiary
thereof under the Pension Plan, nor to grant any additional rights to
any such person under the Pension Plan, nor in any way to limit,
modify, repeal or otherwise affect the Employer's right to amend or
modify the Pension Plan.
10.03 AMENDMENTS/TERMINATION
The Employer reserves the right to amend or terminate this Plan by
written instrument signed by a duly authorized officer, provided that
no such amendment or termination shall reduce any benefits earned under
the terms of the Plan prior to the date of the termination or
amendment.
10.04 ON-ASSIGNABILITY
The benefits payable under the Plan shall not be subject to alienation,
assignment, garnishment, execution or levy of any kind and any attempt
to cause any benefits to be so subjected shall not be recognized,
except to the extent required by law.
10.05 CLAIMS PROCEDURE
Any Participant or Beneficiary of a deceased Participant may deliver to
the Committee a written claim for a determination with respect to the
amounts distributable to such claimant under the Plan. The procedures
for handling such request shall follow the claims procedures of the
Pension Plan.
- 12-
10.06 ENTIRE AGREEMENT: SUCCESSORS
The Plan, including any subsequently adopted amendments, shall
constitute the entire agreement or contract between the Employer and
any Participant regarding the Plan. There are no covenants, promises,
agreements, conditions or understandings, either oral or written,
between the Employer and any Participant relating to the subject matter
hereof, other than those set forth in the Plan. The Plan and any
amendment shall be binding on the parties hereto and their respective
heirs, administrators, trustees, successors and assigns, and on all
designated beneficiaries of the Participant.
10.07 CHANGE OF CONTROL
Upon a Change of Control, each Participant will become fully vested in
a minimum benefit which is based on the Participant's Final Average
Compensation, Qualified Plan Benefit, Supplemental Plan Benefit, and
Social Security Benefit earned through the Change of Control date, and
Credited Service determined assuming the Participant has three
additional years of Credited Service. Furthermore, the minimum benefit
payable on an Early Retirement Date shall assume the Participant is
three years older. Benefits, reduced for commencement prior to Normal
Retirement Date, if applicable, should commence at the later of the
date the Participant terminates employment and the first day of the
month coincident with or next following the Participant's 55th
birthday.
A Participant shall continue to earn benefits under this Plan for
employment which occurs subsequent to a Change of Control. The benefit
earned as of a date subsequent to a Change of Control shall be the
greater of the Accrued Benefit as of such date and the minimum benefit
as of the Change of Control date. The vesting which occurs in
accordance with the preceding paragraph does not apply to benefits in
excess of the minimum benefit.
10.08 SUCCESSOR EMPLOYER
In the event of the dissolution, merger, consolidation or
reorganization of the Employer, provision may be made by which a
successor to all or a major portion of the Employer's property or
business shall continue the Plan, and the successor shall have all the
powers, duties and responsibilities of the Employer under the Plan.
10.09 FORFEITURE
Except as provided in Section 10.07, the benefits otherwise payable by
the Plan on behalf of the Participant or his beneficiary shall be
forfeited if any one of the following events occur:
(a) The Participant, during the twenty-four month period following
the date the Participant's employment with the Employer
terminates, becomes an officer,
- 13 -
director, shareholder (of more than 10% of the stock of a
corporation), or employer of a corporation, or the owner of a
business, or a member of a partnership which conducts a business
in competition with the business of the Employer.
(b) The Participant is discharged from the Employer on the basis of
fraud or dishonesty.
(c) Employment with the Employer is terminated prior to attaining
both age 55 and five years of Credited Service.
1O.10 GOVERNING LAW
This Plan shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and
governed by, the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and of the
United States.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, UST Corp. has caused this instrument to be executed in its
name and on its behalh on the 18th day of February ,1997.
UST CORP.
/s/ William Schwartz
------------------------------
William Schwartz
Title: Chairman of the Board
Attest:
/s/ Eric R.Fischer
- ----------------------
(Seal)
- 14-
UST CORP. EXECUTIVE POLICY COMMITTEE PLAN
ILLUSTRATIVE BENEFIT CALCULATION WORKSHEET
TARGET BENEFIT
50% of Final Average Compensation ______________
x Service Ratio = Credited Service/20 (not to exceed 1.0) x ______________
x Reduction for Early Commencement x ______________
= Target Benefit = ______________
- - QUALIFIED PLAN BENEFIT payable at Benefit
Commencement Date - ______________
- - SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN BENEFIT payable at Benefit
Commencement Date - ______________
- - SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT payable at Benefit
Commeneement Date - ______________
= EXECUTIVE POLICY COMMITTEE PLAN BENEFIT
payable as a single life annuity = ______________
x 50% Joint and Contingent Annuity factor,
if married at least one year x ______________
= EXECUTIVE POLICY COMMITTEE PLAN BENEFIT
payable as a 50% Joint and Contingent annuity = ______________
EXHIBIT 10(i)(ii)
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
I, Eric R. Fischer, Clerk of UST Corp., do hereby certify that the
following is a true copy of a vote duly adopted by said Board at a regular
meeting thereof held on September 17, 1996, a quorum of Directors being present
and voting throughout:
VOTED: that, upon the recommendation of UST Corp.'s Employee Benefits
Committee, the Board hereby amends the UST Employee Savings
Plan, effective January 1, 1997: (i) to improve the Company
match to 100% of the first 2% contributed and 25% of the next
4% (maximum Company match equals 3% of pay); AND (ii) to
increase the maximum employee contribution from 10% to 12%;
AND (iii) to allow employees who are regularly scheduled, for
more than 20 hours and on the payroll by November 15, 1996, to
join the Plan as of January 1, 1997; AND (iv) to authorize the
Senior Vice President/Human Resources to take such steps and
to execute such documents as may be required (or deemed by her
desirable) to effect this amendment.
I do hereby certify that the above vote has not been rescinded, revoked or
modified and has been duly entered in the minute books of UST Corp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed hereto the
seal of UST Corp. this 2nd day of October, 1996.
UST Corp.
(SEAL)
/s/ Eric R. Fischer
-----------------------
Eric R. Fischer
Clerk
EXHIBIT 10(n)(i)
UST
AMENDMENT
This Agreement amends the First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between Neal F. Finnegan and UST Corp. dated as of the 21st day of November,
1995 (the "Employment Agreement"). All capitalized terms used in this Agreement
shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement unless
otherwise provided herein.
1. The original term of the Employment Agreement is hereby extended such
that it shall expire on January 4, 2000.
2. The Employee's base salary is hereby increased effective January 1,
1997, to a rate of $480,000 per annum.
3. In addition to the stock options previously granted the Employee as set
forth in Section II of the Employment Agreement, the Employee is
granted on January 2, 1997, a total of 50,000 stock options under the
Plan, priced at fair market value at the close of trading on January 2,
1997, as reported by the Wall Street Journal (the "Exercise Price").
The options shall vest as follows: (i) one third of the shares on
January 2, 1997; (ii) one third on the earlier of January 2, 1998 or
the first trading day on which the closing price of UST Common Stock
shall have equaled or exceeded for ten consecutive trading days the
Exercise Price plus Three Dollars ($3.00); and (iii) the last third on
the earlier of January 2, 1999 or the first trading day on which the
closing price of UST Common Stock shall have equaled or exceeded for
ten consecutive trading days the Exercise Price plus Six Dollars
($6.00).
4. In addition to shares of Restricted Stock previously granted the
Employee as set forth in Section II of the Employment Agreement, the
Employee is granted on January 2, 1997 a total 10,800 shares of
Restricted Stock under the plan which shall vest on January 2, 1999, in
accordance with the Plan.
5. The options and Restricted Stock granted to the Employee under this
Agreement shall vest in accordance with Section VIIIC. of the
Employment Agreement in the event of a Change of Control.
6. Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement, and all
of its terms and provisions, shall remain in full force and effect.
UST Corp.
40 Court Street. Boston. Massachusetts 02108
(617) 726-7000 Telex 951494 UST BSN
Intending to be legally bound, the parties have signed this Agreement as of
the 17th day of December, 1996.
UST CORP:
By: /s/ William Schwartz
------------------------
William Schwartz
Title: Chairman of the Board
/s/ Neal F. Finnegan
------------------------
Neal F. Finnegan
EXHIBIT 10(o)(x)
AMENDMENT
This Agreement amends the First Amended Executive Exmployment Agreement
between the Employee and UST Corp. dated as of the 1st day of February, 1996
(the "Employment Agreement"). All capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall
have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement unless otherwise
expressly provided herein.
1. Section 6.d.i and Section 6.e of the Employment Agreement are hereby
amended to provide that, in addition to base salary payable thereunder,
the Employee shall be paid an amount equal to the bonus which the
Employee earned for performance during the calendar year immediately
preceding the year in which termination occurs.
2. Section 6.g.i(1) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to
provide that, in addition to base salary payable thereunder, the
Employee shall be paid an amount equal to two (2) times the bonus which
the Employee earned for performance during the calendar year immediately
preceding the year in which termination occurs.
3. Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement, and all
of its terms and provisions, shall remain in full force and effect.
Intending to be legally bound, the parties have signed this Agreement as of
the 17th day of December, 1996.
UST CORP:
By: s/
------------------------------
Neal F. Finnegan
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
EMPLOYEE:
s/
-----------------------------------
Employee
UST Corp.
40 Court Street. Boston. Massachusetts 02108
(617) 726-7000 Telex 951494 UST BSN
EXHIBIT 10(s)(i)
December 31, 1996
TO: Eric Fischer
FR: Asset Management Principals
RE: Re-allocation of Formula Payment Shares
Please accept this memorandum as notification that at a meeting of the
principals on December 26, 1996, a supermajority, as provided in our "unifying
Agreement" voted to re-allocate shares as follows:
Principal Current Share New Share
Domenic Colasacco 25% 25%
Robert Lincoln 15% 15%
Stephen Moody 10% 12.5%
Lucia Santini 5% 5%
Robert Zevin 20% 12.5%
Unallocated 25% 30%
We acknowledge the above vote.
/s/ Domenic Colasacco /s/ Robert Lincoln /s/ Stephen Moody
- --------------------- ------------------ -----------------
Domenic Colasacco Robert Lincoln Stephen Moody
/s/ Robert Zevin /s/ Lucia Santini
- --------------------- ------------------
Robert Zevin Lucia Santini
EXHIBIT 21
Subsidiaries of UST Corp.(*)
USTrust
United States Trust Company
JSA Financial Corporation
UST Leasing Corporation (**)
UST Securities Corp. (**)
Mosaic Corp.
UST Capital Corp. (***)
USTrust Securities Corp. (****)
(*) Each of the above subsidiaries of UST Corp. is a Massachusetts
Corporation or trust company and each of the above entities does
business only under its corporate name with the exception of USTrust,
which does business under the name "USTrust Bank" as well as the name
"USTrust." The foregoing list does not include the names of inactive
subsidiaries or the names of subsidiaries of banking entities which
subsidiaries have been organized to hold foreclosed property, or other
assets held in satisfaction of debts previously contracted by the
applicable banking entity.
(**) Wholly-owned by USTrust
(***) Wholly-owned by United States Trust Company
(****) Organized as a wholly-owned subsidiary of UST Securities Corp. on
February 24, 1997.
As of January 3, 1997, the following additional companies became subsidiaries of
the Company:
The Co-operative Bank of Concord
The Braintree Savings Bank
Walden Financial Corp.
Builders Collaborative, Inc.
Braintree Savings Corporation
Walden Securities Corporation, Inc.
Bra-Prop Corporation
Braintree Securities Corp.
Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Public Accountants
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion in this
Form 10-K of our report dated January 31, 1997. It should be noted that we have
not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31,
1996 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.
s/Arthur Andersen LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UST CORP. AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FORM
10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 111,475
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS> 57
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD> 127,469
<TRADING-ASSETS> 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE> 528,174
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING> 0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET> 0
<LOANS> 1,848,142
<ALLOWANCE> 38,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 2,706,614
<DEPOSITS> 2,105,866
<SHORT-TERM> 348,066
<LIABILITIES-OTHER> 54,722
<LONG-TERM> 0
11,262
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 186,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 2,706,614
<INTEREST-LOAN> 122,279
<INTEREST-INVEST> 34,317
<INTEREST-OTHER> 1,058
<INTEREST-TOTAL> 157,654
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT> 45,256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 61,528
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET> 96,126
<LOAN-LOSSES> (18,600)
<SECURITIES-GAINS> 1,113
<EXPENSE-OTHER> 98,338
<INCOME-PRETAX> 53,676
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> 53,676
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 32,662
<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.79
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL> 8.08
<LOANS-NON> 26,424
<LOANS-PAST> 363
<LOANS-TROUBLED> 45
<LOANS-PROBLEM> 9,800
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN> 56,029
<CHARGE-OFFS> 5,859
<RECOVERIES> 9,323
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE> 38,789
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC> 38,789
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN> 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED> 9,035
</TABLE>
