<PAGE> 1
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JULY 9, 1998
REGISTRATION NO. 333-51203
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------
ZILOG, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
DELAWARE 3674 13-3092996
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (PRIMARY STANDARD INDUSTRIAL (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) CLASSIFICATION CODE NUMBER) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
</TABLE>
910 EAST HAMILTON AVENUE, CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008, (408) 558-8550
(ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF
REGISTRANT'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
------------------------
RICHARD R. PICKARD, ESQ.
VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY
ZILOG, INC.
910 EAST HAMILTON AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 558-8500
(NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE,
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE)
COPIES OF CORRESPONDENCE TO:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
KATHARINE A. MARTIN, ESQ. STEPHEN H. SHALEN, ESQ.
PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON
2550 HANOVER STREET ONE LIBERTY PLAZA
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94304-1115 NEW YORK, NY 10006
</TABLE>
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
As soon as practicable after the Registration Statement becomes effective.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. [ ]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
------------------------
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID
SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
PROSPECTUS
ZILOG, INC.
Offer to Exchange Series B 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due
2005, which have been registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, for any and all outstanding Series A 9 1/2%
Senior Secured Notes due 2005
The Exchange Offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on August
7, 1998, unless extended.
Zilog, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company," the "Issuer" or
"Zilog"), hereby offers, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in this Prospectus and the accompanying letter of transmittal (the "Letter of
Transmittal," and, together with this Prospectus, the "Exchange Offer"), to
exchange its Series B 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the "New Notes"),
which have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), pursuant to a Registration Statement (as defined herein) of
which this Prospectus is a part, for any and all of the outstanding Series A
9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 of the Issuer (the "Old Notes"). The New
Notes and the Old Notes are collectively referred to herein as the "Notes."
Any and all Old Notes that are validly tendered and not withdrawn on or
prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the date the Exchange Offer expires,
which will be August 7, 1998 (30 calendar days following the commencement of the
Exchange Offer) unless the Exchange Offer is extended (such date, including as
extended, the "Expiration Date"), will be accepted for exchange. Tenders of Old
Notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on
the Expiration Date. The Exchange Offer is not conditioned upon any minimum
principal amount of Old Notes being tendered for exchange. However, the Exchange
Offer is subject to certain customary conditions, which may be waived by the
Issuer, and to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 27, 1998, by and among the Issuer and Goldman Sachs & Co., BancBoston
Securities Inc. and Citicorp Securities, Inc. (the "Initial Purchasers") (the
"Registration Rights Agreement"). Old Notes may only be tendered in integral
multiples of $1,000. See "The Exchange Offer."
The New Notes will be obligations of Zilog and will be entitled to the
benefits of the same Indenture (as defined herein) that governs the Old Notes.
The form and terms of the New Notes are the same in all material respects as the
form and terms of the Old Notes, except that the New Notes do not contain terms
with respect to liquidated damages provisions and the New Notes have been
registered under the Securities Act and therefore will not bear legends
restricting the transfer thereof. See "The Exchange Offer" and "Description of
the New Notes."
The New Notes will be represented by permanent global notes in fully
registered form and will be deposited with, or on behalf of, The Depository
Trust Company ("DTC") and registered in the name of a nominee of DTC. Beneficial
interests in the permanent global notes will be shown on, and transfers thereof
will be effected through, records maintained by DTC and its participants.
The New Notes are being offered hereunder to satisfy certain obligations of
Zilog contained in the Registration Rights Agreement. Based on interpretations
by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), as
set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties, including Exxon Capital
Holdings Corporation, SEC No-Action Letter (available April 13, 1988), Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, SEC No-Action Letter (available June 5, 1991) and
Shearman & Sterling, SEC No-Action Letter (available July 2, 1993)
(collectively, the "Exchange Offer No-Action Letters"), the Issuer believes that
the New Notes issued pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be offered for resale,
resold or otherwise transferred by each holder (other than a broker-dealer who
acquires such New Notes directly from the Issuer for resale pursuant to Rule
144A under the Securities Act or any other available exemption under the
Securities Act and other than any holder that is an "affiliate" (as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Issuer) without compliance with the
registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act, provided
that such New Notes are acquired in the ordinary course of such holder's
business and such holder is not engaged in, and does not intend to engage in, a
distribution of such New Notes and has no arrangement with any person to
participate in a distribution of such New Notes. By tendering Old Notes in
exchange for New Notes, each holder, other than a broker-dealer, will represent
to the Issuer that: (i) it is not an affiliate (as defined in Rule 405 under the
Securities Act) of the Issuer; (ii) it is not a broker-dealer tendering Old
Notes acquired for its own account directly from the Issuer; (iii) any New Notes
to be received by it will be acquired in the ordinary course of its business;
and (iv) it is not engaged in, and does not intend to engage in, a distribution
of such New Notes and has no arrangement or understanding to participate in a
distribution of New Notes. If a holder of Old Notes is engaged in or intends to
engage in a distribution of New Notes or has any arrangement or understanding
with respect to the distribution of New Notes to be acquired pursuant to the
Exchange Offer, such holder may not rely on the applicable interpretations of
the staff of the Commission and must comply with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any secondary
resale transaction.
FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY
PARTICIPANTS IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER, SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 15 OF
THIS PROSPECTUS.
------------------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
------------------------
The date of this Prospectus is July 9, 1998
<PAGE> 3
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account pursuant to
the Exchange Offer (a "Participating Broker-Dealer") must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in
connection with any resale of such New Notes. The Letter of Transmittal states
that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a Participating
Broker-Dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the
meaning of the Securities Act. This Prospectus, as it may be amended or
supplemented from time to time, may be used by a Participating Broker-Dealer in
connection with resales of New Notes received in exchange for Old Notes where
such Old Notes were acquired by such Participating Broker-Dealer as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities. Pursuant to the
Registration Rights Agreement, the Issuer has agreed that it will make this
Prospectus available to any Participating Broker-Dealer for use in connection
with any such resale for a period of time not to exceed one year after the date
on which the Exchange Offer is consummated. See "Plan of Distribution."
The Issuer will not receive any proceeds from the Exchange Offer. The
Issuer has agreed to pay the expenses of the Exchange Offer. No underwriter is
being utilized in connection with the Exchange Offer.
THE EXCHANGE OFFER IS NOT BEING MADE TO, NOR WILL THE ISSUER ACCEPT
SURRENDERS FOR EXCHANGE FROM, HOLDERS OF OLD NOTES IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH
THE EXCHANGE OFFER OR THE ACCEPTANCE THEREOF WOULD NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
SECURITIES AND BLUE SKY LAWS OF SUCH JURISDICTION.
The Old Notes have been designated as eligible for trading in the Private
Offerings, Resale and Trading through Automated Linkages ("PORTAL") market.
Prior to this Exchange Offer, there has been no public market for the New Notes.
If such a market were to develop, the New Notes could trade at prices that may
be higher or lower than their principal amount. The Issuer does not intend to
apply for listing of the New Notes on any securities exchange or for quotation
of the New Notes on The Nasdaq Stock Market's National Market or otherwise. The
Initial Purchasers have previously made a market in the Old Notes, and the
Issuer has been advised that the Initial Purchasers currently intend to make a
market in the New Notes, as permitted by applicable laws and regulations, after
consummation of the Exchange Offer. The Initial Purchasers are not obligated,
however, to make a market in the Old Notes or the New Notes and any such
market-making activity may be discontinued at any time without notice at the
sole discretion of the Initial Purchasers. There can be no assurance as to the
liquidity of the public market for the New Notes or that any active public
market for the New Notes will develop or continue. If an active public market
does not develop or continue, the market price and liquidity of the New Notes
may be adversely affected. See "Risk Factors -- Lack of Public Market for the
Notes."
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Issuer is not currently subject to the periodic reporting and other
informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the "Exchange Act"). The Issuer will become subject to such requirements upon
the effectiveness of the Registration Statement (as defined below). Pursuant to
the indenture by and among the Issuer and State Street Bank and Trust Company (
the "Trustee"), dated as of February 27, 1998 (the "Indenture"), the Issuer has
agreed to file with the Commission and provide to the holders of the Old Notes
annual reports and the information, documents and other reports which are
required to be delivered pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
This Prospectus constitutes a part of a registration statement on Form S-4
(together with all amendments and exhibits, the "Registration Statement") filed
by the Issuer with the Commission, through the Electronic Data Gathering,
Analysis and Retrieval System ("EDGAR"), under the Securities Act, with respect
to the New Notes offered hereby. This Prospectus omits certain of the
information contained in the Registration Statement, and reference is hereby
made to the Registration Statement for further information with respect to the
Issuer and the securities offered hereby. Although statements concerning and
summaries of certain documents are included herein, reference is made to the
copies of such documents filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement or
otherwise filed with the Commission. These documents may be inspected without
charge at the office of the Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies may be obtained at fees and
2
<PAGE> 4
charges prescribed by the Commission. Copies of such materials may also be
obtained from the Web site that the Commission maintains at http://www.sec.gov.
Zilog(R) and Z-80(R) are trademarks of Zilog, Inc. Trademarks of other
corporations and organizations are also referenced in this Prospectus.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Prospectus includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
various provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. All statements,
other than statements of historical facts, included in this Prospectus that
address activities, events or developments that Zilog expects or anticipates
will or may occur in the future, including such things as cost-cutting measures
and future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof),
business strategy and measures to implement strategy, competitive strengths,
goals, expansion and growth of Zilog's and its subsidiaries' business and
operations, product introduction schedules, plans, discontinuation of certain
businesses or operations, references to future success and other such matters,
are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain
assumptions and analyses made by Zilog in light of its experience and its
perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future
developments as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the
circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to
Zilog's expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially, including the
significant considerations and risks discussed in this Prospectus; general
economic, market or business conditions; the opportunities (or lack thereof)
that may be presented to and pursued by Zilog and its subsidiaries; competitive
actions by other companies; changes in laws or regulations; and other factors,
many of which are beyond the control of Zilog and its subsidiaries.
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Prospectus are
qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the
results or developments anticipated by Zilog will be realized or, even if
substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or
effects on Zilog and its subsidiaries or their business or operations. The
Issuer expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any
updates or revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that occur or arise or are anticipated to occur or arise after the
date hereof.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
All reports and any definitive proxy or information statements filed by the
Issuer pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
subsequent to the date of this Prospectus and prior to the termination of the
offering of the New Notes offered hereby shall be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into this Prospectus and to be a part hereof from the date of filing
of such documents. Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed
to be incorporated herein by reference, or contained in this Prospectus, shall
be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus to the
extent that a statement contained herein or in any other subsequently filed
document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein
modifies or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so modified or
superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute a part of this Prospectus.
THIS PROSPECTUS INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NOT PRESENTED
HEREIN OR DELIVERED HEREWITH. A COPY OF ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED
HEREIN BY REFERENCE (EXCLUDING EXHIBITS, UNLESS SUCH EXHIBITS ARE SPECIFICALLY
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE) WILL BE PROVIDED WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH
PERSON, INCLUDING ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER, TO WHOM A PROSPECTUS IS DELIVERED, UPON
ORAL OR WRITTEN REQUEST OF ANY SUCH PERSON BY FIRST CLASS MAIL OR OTHER EQUALLY
PROMPT MEANS WITHIN ONE BUSINESS DAY AFTER RECEIPT OF SUCH REQUEST. WITH RESPECT
TO DOCUMENTS OF ZILOG, INC. INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, REQUESTS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO ZILOG, INC., ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS MANAGER, 910 EAST HAMILTON
AVENUE, CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008, (408) 558-8500.
3
<PAGE> 5
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed
information and financial statements and the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Data of the Issuer, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere
in this Prospectus. Except as otherwise set forth herein, references herein to
pro forma financial data of the Issuer are to financial data of the Issuer which
give effect to the Recapitalization (as defined herein), including the issuance
of the Notes, the issuance of the Non-voting Common Stock (as defined herein)
and the issuance of the Preferred Stock (as defined herein). All references
herein to a fiscal year refer to the 12 months ended on December 31 of the year
referenced. All references herein to a fiscal quarter refer to a period which is
thirteen weeks in duration (except for the fiscal quarter ended April 5, 1998,
which was fourteen weeks) ending on the last Sunday of each quarter.
THE ISSUER
Zilog is a worldwide designer, manufacturer and marketer of application
specific standard products ("ASSPs") for use in the high-growth consumer
electronics, data communications and computer peripherals end markets. Through
proprietary design technology, Zilog works with customers to customize its ASSPs
to control the basic function and performance of electronic devices. ASSPs
typically comprise some combination of a microprocessor, digital signal
processor, memory and input/output functions on a single semiconductor. Examples
of Zilog's product applications include chips in televisions that provide
picture-in-picture display and in remote control units that send instructions to
televisions and video cassette recorders, and chips that operate keyboards and
mouse-type pointing devices. Through its worldwide distribution network of more
than 120 representatives and distributors, the Issuer supplies over 800
customers with over 700 products. The average life cycle of these products is
over eight years.
The Issuer places significant emphasis on anticipating and meeting its
customers' needs as new electronic devices are designed. As customers "design
in" Zilog's products, the Issuer is able to gain a greater share of its
customers' purchases while maintaining its embedded position within its
customers' existing products. The Issuer believes that this design strategy is
at the core of its ability to achieve a high degree of customer acceptance
within specific applications. Reflecting the proprietary and often sole-source
nature of its products within its customers' applications, the Issuer's
relationships with its top 10 customers average seven years. In addition,
Zilog's customer base includes many leaders in their respective industries,
including Black & Decker, Cellnet, Cisco, DSC Communications, Fujitsu, General
Instrument, Hewlett-Packard, International Business Machines ("IBM"), Logitech,
Lucky Goldstar, Microsoft, Minebea ("NMB"), Samsung, Sharp and VeriFone.
Founded in 1974, Zilog is a pioneer in the semiconductor market. The
Issuer's Z-80(R) product, introduced in 1975, is the largest selling 8-bit
microprocessor in history and is still being sold today. In 1997, Zilog products
based on the Z-80 architecture accounted for approximately $75 million in
revenue, representing 29% of the Issuer's total revenue. Headquartered in
Campbell, California, the Issuer has two fabrication facilities in Nampa, Idaho
and two test and assembly centers in the Philippines. For the three months ended
April 5, 1998, Zilog had revenue of $49.5 million and pro forma EBITDA of $2.5
million.
THE INDUSTRY
According to trade statistics published by the Semiconductor Industry
Association (the "SIA"), revenue for the worldwide semiconductor market was $137
billion in 1997. The overall semiconductor market has expanded at a compound
annual growth rate of 17% from 1991 to 1997. The semiconductor industry is
comprised of three broad product segments: logic devices, including
microprocessors, microcontrollers and digital signal processors, which process
data (approximately 50% of total industry sales); memory devices, which store
data (approximately 22% of total industry sales); and analog and discrete
devices, which process electronic signals (approximately 28% of total industry
sales). Zilog develops, manufactures and markets products in the logic device
segment. The logic device segment further consists of three distinct categories:
(i) general purpose logic products, such as the Intel Pentium(R) microprocessor,
which are neither application
4
<PAGE> 6
nor customer specific, are used for a wide array of logic-related functions and
are typically capable of more functions than are actually required for any given
application; (ii) application or customer specific integrated circuits
("ASICs"), which are designed to meet particular application requirements, are
usually proprietary to one customer and are generally produced in relatively
small volumes; and (iii) ASSPs, which are designed for a particular application,
but are not proprietary to a single customer. The Issuer's ASSPs typically
comprise some combination of a microprocessor, digital signal processor, memory
and input/output functions on a single semiconductor to control the basic
function and performance of its customers' products.
Revenue for the ASSP segment of the semiconductor industry has grown from
$14.6 billion in 1994 to $27.8 billion in 1997, a compound annual growth rate of
approximately 24%, and is forecasted to grow to $44.6 billion by the year 2000.
The Issuer believes that the market for ASSPs is distinct from other logic and
memory markets in that it is less cyclical and that ASSPs typically have longer
product life cycles. Applications in the ASSP market generally do not demand the
processing power of general purpose microprocessors such as the Intel Pentium(R)
microprocessor, which operates personal computers; rather, Zilog's products
operate or perform specialized functions in everyday products such as
telephones, garage door openers and televisions, all of which exhibit growing
degrees of silicon content.
THE ISSUER'S STRENGTHS
As a pioneer in the industry, Zilog has established a well-recognized and
respected brand name in its markets and has developed strong, long-term
relationships with numerous customers who are leaders in their respective
markets. The Issuer's franchise is built upon several specific strengths,
including the following:
LEADING MARKET POSITION WITH HIGH QUALITY CUSTOMER BASE. The Issuer
believes it maintains a leading market position in several niches, including
television remote controls, keyboards and mouse-type pointing devices.
Approximately 70% of its revenue is derived from relationships with customers
for a particular proprietary product design. The Issuer believes that these
relationships provide a significant recurring revenue stream and represent a
strong competitive advantage for Zilog as a redesign of the customer's hardware
and software to use a competitor's ASSP would often involve substantial costs to
the customer. In addition, Zilog believes that it has established strong,
long-term relationships by partnering with customers throughout the interactive
product design and manufacturing process. Currently, the Issuer sells to more
than 800 customers worldwide, and its relationships with its top 10 customers
average seven years. In consumer electronics, Zilog sells to customers that
include Black & Decker, Samsung, SGS-Thomson, Sony and Zenith. In data
communications, Zilog's customers include Lucent Technologies ("Lucent"), Cisco,
IBM, Motorola and VeriFone. Zilog's computer peripheral customers include
Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft and NMB, the largest keyboard manufacturer in the
world.
DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS AND MARKETS. Within the consumer electronics, data
communications and computer peripherals end markets, Zilog currently sells and
markets over 700 products to more than 800 customers worldwide. The Issuer sells
either directly through its 29 sales offices or indirectly through its more than
120 sales representatives and distributors located throughout the world. In
1997, no single product or single customer accounted for more than 8% of total
revenue. The Issuer believes that its product and market diversity, its
independence from reliance on any one customer and its numerous sales personnel
and locations around the world help to insulate the Issuer from some of the
volatility that affects other companies in the semiconductor industry. The
Issuer also believes no competitor addresses exactly the same diverse set of
markets.
COMPREHENSIVE PROPRIETARY DESIGN LIBRARY. Based upon over 20 years of
design expertise, Zilog's proprietary design library allows customers to select
or modify proven components that can be combined and assembled to create new
products or new applications. Zilog's customers that have designed their
products using one or more of the Issuer's devices can redesign and upgrade to
new Zilog ASSPs, often without the loss of hardware or software compatibility.
This methodology allows customers to leverage Zilog's vast component library to
advance their own product development processes. Because of extensive
customization, Zilog's customers depend upon Zilog's expertise for much of their
end-product functionality. A Zilog customer switching to a non-Zilog design
could incur significant learning, design, software and manufacturing costs.
5
<PAGE> 7
OWNERSHIP OF STATE-OF-THE-ART MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Over the last three
years, Zilog has spent $235 million to increase capacity and improve efficiency
by building a new wafer fabrication facility, renovating an existing facility
and equipping both facilities with state-of-the-art equipment. These facilities
contain fabrication modules equipped to manufacture products with competitive
submicron dimensions. Overall, the Issuer estimates that it is operating its
fabrication facilities at 60% capacity, enabling Zilog to capitalize on future
upswings in industry demand. The present building also has sufficient space and
infrastructure to accommodate the additional machinery for a 50% increase in
total capacity. The Company may engage in certain cost-cutting measures to
enable it to operate more efficiently for the amount of product now being
manufactured.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Under the leadership of Curtis J. Crawford, formerly Group President of the
Microelectronics Group and President of the Intellectual Property Division of
Lucent, and now Zilog's President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the
Issuer intends to capitalize on its core strengths with the following business
strategies:
INCREASE EFFICIENCY OF SALES OPERATIONS. The Issuer intends to consolidate
its sales operations to improve efficiency and focus its direct sales force and
its manufacturers' sales representatives on developing larger volume customers.
Zilog will work with distributors to better manage the large number of small
customers. The Issuer believes that an increased emphasis on design wins by
refocusing its field application engineering and sales resources and
improvements in design tools for use by its customers should lead to an
increased base of recurring revenue from its customers. Zilog increased its
design wins from 180 in 1995 to over 200 each in 1996 and 1997.
FOCUS APPLICATIONS. Utilizing its library of proprietary designs, the
Issuer has introduced an average of 39 new products annually since 1993,
including 36 new products in 1997. The Issuer's strategy is to focus its efforts
on those product lines in which Zilog believes it has the expertise to succeed.
By concentrating its efforts in fewer areas, Zilog intends to upgrade its
existing product lines to meet the changing requirements of evolving
applications. In addition to releasing new or upgraded products in its historic
market applications (e.g., keyboards, mouse-type pointing devices and television
remote controls), Zilog expects to introduce in 1998 products in several areas
that capitalize on its technological expertise, including transaction processing
(credit card) modems, internet-access devices for televisions and telephones and
enhanced universal serial bus ("USB") keyboard and pointing device
microcontrollers for personal computers.
EXPAND PRODUCT CAPABILITIES. The Issuer's position within its markets
depends in part upon the strength and capabilities of its library of proprietary
designs. Zilog intends to expand its existing library by utilizing its
engineering resources more effectively, investing in computer-aided development
tools to assist the Issuer's design engineers and acquiring additional design
technology from third parties. By investing in its design library, Zilog will be
able to offer more products with broader functionalities and enhance its
competitive position with new and existing customers.
STRENGTHEN INTERNAL SYSTEMS AND CUSTOMER SUPPORT TOOLS. The Issuer intends
to increase the efficiency of its experienced employee workforce by investing in
appropriate productivity tools and upgrading office workspace. For example, the
Issuer intends to invest over $8 million in 1998 in improved internal systems
such as E-mail, computer networks and voicemail. In addition, the Issuer
recently moved its headquarters to a nearby facility providing approximately
33,000 additional square feet of office space. Zilog also intends to improve its
offering of customer support tools such as compilers, emulators and debuggers,
which facilitate customer adoption of Zilog products. With these tools, Zilog
believes the value of its existing product portfolio to its customers, as well
as its ability to create new products, should be significantly enhanced.
LEVERAGE MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES. The Issuer's ownership of a
substantial portion of its manufacturing resources provides an important
strategic advantage. Direct control over fabrication, assembly and test
operations allows Zilog to offer its customers continuous supply, shortens the
Issuer's design and production cycles and allows Zilog to capture the
manufacturing margin. Having spent $235 million over the last three
6
<PAGE> 8
years in order to increase capacity and improve efficiency in its manufacturing
facilities, Zilog believes it is well positioned to increase revenue and margins
in the future. Because of a decrease in business, the Company may engage in
certain cost-cutting measures consistent with its current level of business.
The Company's strategy involves substantial risk. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be successful in implementing its strategy or that its
strategy, even if implemented, will lead to successful achievement of the
Company's objectives. If the Company is unable to implement its strategy
effectively, the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
THE RECAPITALIZATION
The Issuer was established in 1974 and became a wholly owned subsidiary of
Exxon Corporation in 1981. In 1989, Zilog was acquired in a leveraged buyout
transaction sponsored by Warburg Pincus Capital Company, L.P. In 1991, Zilog
became a publicly traded company, and its Common Stock was initially listed on
Nasdaq and traded under the symbol "ZLOG". Zilog's Common Stock was subsequently
listed on the New York Stock Exchange and traded under the symbol "ZLG" until
February 27, 1998.
Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 1997, as
amended (the "Merger Agreement"), entered into by and among TPG Partners II,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("TPG II"), TPG Zeus Acquisition
Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), and Zilog, Merger Sub merged
with and into Zilog (the "Merger"), and Zilog continues as the surviving
corporation. By virtue of the Merger, shares of Zilog Common Stock having an
implied value of approximately $7.5 million held by certain of Zilog's
stockholders were converted into common stock of Zilog. All other shares of
outstanding Common Stock were converted into the right to receive cash
consideration as set forth in the Merger Agreement. In the Merger, the common
stock of Merger Sub was converted into new shares of Common Stock, Non-Voting
Common Stock and Preferred Stock of Zilog. Also, in connection with the Merger,
options to purchase shares of Common Stock issued under Zilog's stock plans
outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger were canceled
and, in certain instances, were converted into the right to receive an amount in
cash, as set forth in the Merger Agreement. Zilog paid approximately $4.2
million to redeem outstanding options as a result of the Merger. The Merger was
approved by Zilog's stockholders on January 27, 1998.
Effective immediately after the consummation of the Merger on February 27,
1998, the Board of Directors of Zilog, the surviving corporation, declared a
4-for-1 stock split in the form of a dividend for each share of Common Stock and
Class A Non-Voting Common Stock and designated 1,500,000 shares of Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock. Unless otherwise specified, all share amounts in
this Prospectus do not give effect to this stock split.
Cash funding requirements for the Merger were satisfied through the
following: (i) a cash equity investment by TPG II and certain other investors of
$117.5 million in Merger Sub (the "Equity Investment"); (ii) use of
approximately $34.0 million of Zilog's cash and cash equivalents; and (iii)
$280.0 million of gross proceeds from the offering of the Old Notes (the
"Offering"). See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation -- Liquidity and Capital Resources." Upon consummation
of the Merger, Zilog became able to borrow up to $25.0 million under a new
senior secured revolving credit facility with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P.
as arranger and syndication agent and BankBoston, N.A. as administrative agent
(the "Revolving Credit Facility").
The Merger was accounted for as a recapitalization transaction for
accounting purposes. The Merger, the Equity Investment, and the Offering are
herein referred to collectively as the "Recapitalization." See "The
Recapitalization."
NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Curtis J. Crawford became President, CEO and a Director of Zilog upon
completion of the Recapitalization. Mr. Crawford, 50, has more than 24 years of
experience in software, systems and semiconductors. He recently served as Group
President of the Microelectronics Group and President of the Intellectual
Property Division of Lucent, a leading designer and manufacturer of a wide range
of communications technologies.
7
<PAGE> 9
As President of Lucent's Microelectronics Group, Mr. Crawford managed the
worldwide development, design, manufacture and sale of semiconductors and
optoelectronic components for applications in telecommunications, networked
computing, multimedia, wireless and consumer electronics. During Mr. Crawford's
tenure, the Microelectronics Group grew external sales from $0.8 billion in 1991
to $2.8 billion in 1997, representing a 23% compound annual growth rate. As
President of Lucent's Intellectual Property Division, Mr. Crawford managed a
broad portfolio of technology patents and licenses.
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
Texas Pacific Group ("TPG") was founded by David Bonderman, James G.
Coulter and William S. Price, III in 1992 to pursue public and private
investment opportunities through a variety of methods, including leveraged
buyouts, recapitalizations, joint ventures, restructurings and strategic public
securities investments. The principals of TPG manage TPG Partners, L.P. and TPG
II, both Delaware limited partnerships, which, with affiliated partnerships,
have aggregate committed capital of over $3.2 billion. Among TPG's investments
are technology and telecommunications companies Paradyne Corporation, GlobeSpan
Semiconductor and GT Com. Other TPG portfolio companies include America West
Airlines, Belden & Blake, Beringer Wine Estates, Del Monte Foods, Denbury
Resources, Ducati Motor, Favorite Brands International, Genesis ElderCare, J.
Crew, Virgin Entertainment and Vivra Specialty Partners. In addition, the
principals of TPG led the $9 billion reorganization of Continental Airlines in
1993.
OTHER
Zilog's principal executive offices are located at 910 East Hamilton
Avenue, Campbell, California 95008-6600, and its telephone number is (408)
558-8500.
SUMMARY OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
AGREEMENT..................... The Old Notes were issued on February 27, 1998
to the Initial Purchasers. The Initial
Purchasers placed the Old Notes with
institutional investors. In connection
therewith, the Issuer and the Initial
Purchasers entered into the Registration Rights
Agreement, providing, among other things, for
the Exchange Offer. See "The Exchange Offer."
THE EXCHANGE OFFER............ New Notes are being offered in exchange for an
equal principal amount of Old Notes. As of the
date hereof, $280,000,000 aggregate principal
amount of Old Notes is outstanding. Old Notes
may be tendered only in integral multiples of
$1,000.
RESALE OF NEW NOTES........... Based on interpretations by the staff of the
Commission, as set forth in no-action letters
issued to third parties, including the Exchange
Offer No-Action Letters, the Issuer believes
that the New Notes issued pursuant to the
Exchange Offer may be offered for resale,
resold or otherwise transferred by each holder
thereof (other than a broker-dealer who
acquires such New Notes directly from the
Issuer for resale pursuant to Rule 144A under
the Securities Act or any other available
exemption under the Securities Act and other
than any holder that is an "affiliate" (as
defined under Rule 405 of the Securities Act)
of the Issuer) without compliance with the
registration and prospectus delivery provisions
of the Securities Act, provided that such New
Notes are acquired in the ordinary course of
such holder's business and such holder is not
engaged in, and does not intend to engage in, a
distribution of such New Notes and has no
arrangement with any person to participate in a
distribution of such New Notes. By tendering
the Old Notes in exchange for New Notes, each
holder, other than a broker-dealer, will
represent to the Issuer that: (i) it is not an
affiliate (as defined in Rule 405 under the
8
<PAGE> 10
Securities Act) of the Issuer; (ii) it is not a
broker-dealer tendering Old Notes acquired for
its own account directly from the Issuer; (iii)
any New Notes to be received by it were
acquired in the ordinary course of its
business; and (iv) it is not engaged in, and
does not intend to engage in, a distribution of
such New Notes and has no arrangement or
understanding to participate in a distribution
of the New Notes. If a holder of Old Notes is
engaged in or intends to engage in a
distribution of the New Notes or has any
arrangement or understanding with respect to
the distribution of the New Notes to be
acquired pursuant to the Exchange Offer, such
holder may not rely on the applicable
interpretations of the staff of the Commission
and must comply with the registration and
prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act in connection with any secondary
resale transaction. Each Participating
Broker-Dealer that receives New Notes for its
own account pursuant to the Exchange Offer must
acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus
meeting the requirements of the Securities Act
in connection with any resale of such New
Notes. The Letter of Transmittal states that by
so acknowledging and by delivering a
prospectus, a Participating Broker-Dealer will
not be deemed to admit that it is an
"underwriter" within the meaning of the
Securities Act. This Prospectus, as it may be
amended or supplemented from time to time, may
be used by a Participating Broker-Dealer in
connection with resales of New Notes received
in exchange for Old Notes where such Old Notes
were acquired by such Participating
Broker-Dealer as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities. The
Issuer has agreed that it will make this
Prospectus available to any Participating
Broker-Dealer for use in connection with any
such resale for a period of time not to exceed
one year after the date on which the Exchange
Offer is consummated. See "Plan of
Distribution." To comply with the securities
laws of certain jurisdictions, it may be
necessary to qualify for sale or register the
New Notes prior to offering or selling such New
Notes. The Issuer has agreed, pursuant to the
Registration Rights Agreement and subject to
certain specified limitations therein, to
register or qualify the New Notes for offer or
sale under the securities or "blue sky" laws of
such jurisdictions as may be necessary to
permit consummation of the Exchange Offer.
CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO
EXCHANGE OLD NOTES............ Upon consummation of the Exchange Offer,
subject to certain exceptions, holders of Old
Notes who do not exchange their Old Notes for
New Notes in the Exchange Offer will no longer
be entitled to registration rights and will not
be able to offer or sell their Old Notes,
unless such Old Notes are subsequently
registered under the Securities Act (which,
subject to certain limited exceptions, the
Issuer will have no obligation to do), except
pursuant to an exemption from, or in a
transaction not subject to, the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws. See "Risk
Factors -- Risk Factors Relating to the
Notes -- Consequences of Failure to Exchange"
and "The Exchange Offer -- Terms of the
Exchange Offer."
EXPIRATION DATE............... 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on August 7,
1998 (30 calendar days following the
commencement of the Exchange Offer), unless the
Exchange Offer is extended, in which case the
term "Expira-
9
<PAGE> 11
tion Date" means the latest date and time to
which the Exchange Offer is extended.
INTEREST ON THE NEW NOTES..... Interest on the New Notes will accrue and be
payable, at a rate of 9 1/2% per annum, on
March 1 and September 1 of each year commencing
September 1, 1998.
CONDITIONS TO THE EXCHANGE
OFFER......................... The Exchange Offer is not conditioned upon any
minimum principal amount of Old Notes being
tendered for exchange. However, the Exchange
Offer is subject to certain customary
conditions, which may, under certain
circumstances, be waived by the Issuer. See
"The Exchange Offer -- Conditions." Except for
the requirements of applicable federal and
state securities laws, there are no federal or
state regulatory requirements to be complied
with or obtained by the Issuer in connection
with the Exchange Offer.
PROCEDURES FOR TENDERING OLD
NOTES......................... Each holder of Old Notes wishing to accept the
Exchange Offer must complete, sign and date the
Letter of Transmittal, in accordance with the
instructions contained herein and therein, and
mail or otherwise deliver such Letter of
Transmittal, together with the Old Notes to be
exchanged and any other required documentation
to the Exchange Agent (as defined herein) at
the address set forth herein or effect a tender
of Old Notes pursuant to the procedures for
book-entry transfer as provided for herein. See
"The Exchange Offer -- Procedures for
Tendering" and "-- Book Entry Transfer."
GUARANTEED DELIVERY
PROCEDURES.................... Holders of Old Notes who wish to tender their
Old Notes and whose Old Notes are not
immediately available or who cannot deliver
their Old Notes and a properly completed Letter
of Transmittal or any other documents required
by the Letter of Transmittal to the Exchange
Agent prior to the Expiration Date may tender
their Old Notes according to the guaranteed
delivery procedures set forth in "The Exchange
Offer -- Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."
WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS............. Tenders of Old Notes may be withdrawn at any
time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on
the Expiration Date. To withdraw a tender of
Old Notes, a written notice of withdrawal must
be received by the Exchange Agent at its
address set forth herein under "The Exchange
Offer -- Exchange Agent" prior to 5:00 p.m.,
New York City time, on the Expiration Date.
ACCEPTANCE OF OLD NOTES AND
DELIVERY OF NEW NOTES......... Subject to certain conditions, any and all Old
Notes that are properly tendered in the
Exchange Offer prior to 5:00 p.m., New York
City time, on the Expiration Date will be
accepted for exchange. The New Notes issued
pursuant to the Exchange Offer will be
delivered promptly following the Expiration
Date. See "The Exchange Offer -- Terms of the
Exchange Offer."
CERTAIN TAX CONSIDERATIONS.... The exchange of New Notes for Old Notes should
not be considered a sale or exchange or
otherwise a taxable event for Federal income
tax purposes. See "Certain United States
Federal Tax Considerations."
EXCHANGE AGENT................ State Street Bank and Trust Company is serving
as exchange agent (the "Exchange Agent") in
connection with the Exchange Offer.
10
<PAGE> 12
FEES AND EXPENSES............. All expenses incident to consummation of the
Exchange Offer and compliance with the
Registration Rights Agreement will be borne by
the Issuer. See "The Exchange Offer -- Fees and
Expenses."
USE OF PROCEEDS............... There will be no cash proceeds payable to the
Issuer from the issuance of the New Notes
pursuant to the Exchange Offer. See "Use of
Proceeds."
SUMMARY OF TERMS OF NEW NOTES
The Exchange Offer relates to the exchange of up to $280,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of Old Notes for up to an equal aggregate principal amount of
New Notes. The New Notes will be entitled to the benefits of the same Indenture
that governs the Old Notes and that will govern the New Notes. The form and
terms of the New Notes are the same in all material respects as the form and
terms of the Old Notes, except that the New Notes do not contain terms with
respect to liquidated damages and the New Notes have been registered under the
Securities Act and therefore will not bear legends restricting the transfer
thereof. See "Description of the New Notes."
MATURITY DATE................. March 1, 2005.
GUARANTEES.................... The Issuer's payment obligations under the
Notes will be jointly and severally guaranteed
(the "Subsidiary Guarantees") by each direct
and indirect domestic subsidiary, if any, of
the Issuer that guarantees any indebtedness of
the Issuer or any other subsidiary of the
Issuer. See "Description of
Notes -- Guarantees."
INTEREST PAYMENT DATES........ March 1 and September 1 of each year,
commencing September 1, 1998.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION........... Except as described below, the New Notes are
not redeemable at the Issuer's option prior to
March 1, 2002. From and after March 1, 2002,
the New Notes will be subject to redemption at
the option of the Issuer, in whole or in part,
upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days'
notice, at the redemption prices set forth
herein, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to the date of redemption.
In addition, prior to March 1, 2001, up to 35%
of the aggregate principal amount of the New
Notes will be redeemable at the option of the
Issuer from the net proceeds of one or more
Public Equity Offerings (as defined herein) at
a price of 109.50% of the principal amount of
the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to the date of redemption; provided that
at least $100.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of New Notes remains outstanding
immediately after each such redemption; and
provided, further, that the notice of any such
redemption shall occur within 90 days of the
date of closing of such Public Equity Offering.
SECURITY...................... The New Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees
will be secured by: (a) a first priority
security interest in substantially all of the
Issuer's and its domestic subsidiaries (if any)
real and personal property, including all plant
and equipment at operating facilities, subject
to Permitted Liens (as defined herein), and
excluding, among other things, inventory,
accounts receivable and the proceeds thereof
and (b) a pledge of all of the capital stock of
the Issuer's domestic subsidiaries (if any) and
65% of the capital stock of the Issuer's
foreign subsidiaries (the "Collateral"). The
Collat-
11
<PAGE> 13
eral also includes proceeds resulting from an
Event of Loss (as defined herein) or a
Collateral Asset Sale (as defined herein)
pending application thereof. No appraisals of
any of the Collateral have been prepared by or
on behalf of the Issuer in connection with the
sale of the Notes. The value of the Collateral
at any time will depend on market and other
economic conditions, including the availability
of suitable buyers for the Collateral. See
"Description of Notes -- Security."
CHANGE OF CONTROL............. In the event of a Change of Control, the Issuer
will be required to make an offer to repurchase
the New Notes at a price equal to 101% of the
principal amount thereof, plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. See
"Risk Factors -- Ability to Effect Repurchase
of the Notes upon Change of Control."
RANKING....................... The New Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees (if
any) will be senior secured indebtedness of the
Issuer and the Guarantors (if any) ranking pari
passu in right of payment with all other senior
borrowings of the Issuer and the Guarantors (if
any) and the New Notes will be structurally
subordinated to all indebtedness and other
liabilities and commitments (including trade
payables and capital lease obligations) of the
Issuer's foreign subsidiaries. Any right of the
Issuer to receive assets of any of its foreign
subsidiaries upon the latter's liquidation or
reorganization (and the consequent right of the
holders of the New Notes to participate in
those assets) will be effectively subordinated
to the claims of that subsidiary's creditors,
except to the extent that the Issuer is itself
recognized as a creditor of such subsidiary, in
which case the claims of the Issuer would still
be subordinate to any security in the assets of
such subsidiary and any indebtedness of such
subsidiary senior to that held by the Issuer.
As of April 5, 1998, the indebtedness
(including trade payables and capital lease
obligations) of the Issuer's foreign
subsidiaries was $1.9 million. See "Description
of Notes -- Ranking."
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS......... The Indenture governing the New Notes contains
certain covenants that among other things,
limit the ability of the Issuer and its
Subsidiaries to incur additional Indebtedness
(as defined herein), issue Disqualified Stock
(as defined herein), pay dividends or
distributions, make investments or certain
other Restricted Payments (as defined herein),
enter into certain transactions with
affiliates, dispose of certain assets, incur
liens and engage in mergers and consolidations.
See "Description of Notes."
USE OF PROCEEDS
There will be no cash proceeds payable to the Issuer from the issuance of
the New Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer. The proceeds from the sale of the
Old Notes were used to fund the Recapitalization. See "Use of Proceeds" and "The
Recapitalization."
RISK FACTORS
See "Risk Factors" for a discussion of certain factors that should be
considered in evaluating an investment in the Notes.
12
<PAGE> 14
SUMMARY HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below are summary historical and pro forma financial data of the
Issuer. The summary historical consolidated financial data as of December 31,
1997 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 have
been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, consolidated
financial statements that have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
auditors, appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus. The summary historical
consolidated financial data for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 1994 have been derived from consolidated financial statements that
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, which are not
included or incorporated herein. The summary historical financial data as of
April 5, 1998 and for the three months in the periods ended March 30, 1997 and
April 5, 1998 have been derived from the unaudited financial statements of the
Company included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The Pro Forma Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data and Other Data for the year ended December 31,
1997 and the three months in the period ended April 5, 1998 give effect to the
Recapitalization as though it had occurred on January 1, 1997. The pro forma
adjustments as applied to the respective historical consolidated financial
information of the Issuer reflect and account for the Merger as a
recapitalization. Accordingly, the historical basis of the Issuer's assets and
liabilities has not been impacted by the Recapitalization. The information
presented below should be read in conjunction with "Capitalization," "Unaudited
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information," "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto and other financial information included
elsewhere in this Prospectus. See also "Available Information" and "Disclosure
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HISTORICAL
--------------------
HISTORICAL THREE MONTHS PRO
---------------------------------------------------- PRO FORMA ENDED FORMA
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------ -------------------- --------
---------------------------------------------------- DECEMBER 31, MARCH 30, APRIL 5, APRIL 5,
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1997 1998 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------------ --------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS DATA:
Sales..................... $202,727 $223,316 $265,122 $298,425 $261,097 $261,097 $70,136 $ 49,539 $ 49,539
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales............. 105,727 111,288 135,066 175,319 171,722 171,722 44,028 40,767 40,767
Research and
development............. 20,833 23,048 24,546 30,548 30,467 30,467 6,632 8,104 8,104
Selling, general and
administrative.......... 37,619 37,790 41,943 47,934 47,806 47,806 12,052 13,941 13,941
Recapitalization.......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,304 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Total costs and
expenses................ 164,179 172,126 201,555 253,801 249,995 249,995 62,712 76,116 62,812
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss)... 38,548 51,190 63,567 44,624 11,102 11,102 7,424 (26,577) (13,273)
Other income (expense):
Interest income........... 2,463 2,496 2,676 2,443 2,892 1,596 595 1,159 1,099
Interest expense.......... -- -- -- -- -- (28,429) -- (2,978) (7,339)
Other..................... 813 860 (360) (911) 832 832 (880) (88) (88)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
income taxes............ 41,824 54,546 65,883 46,156 14,826 (14,899) 7,139 (28,484) (19,601)
Provision (benefit) for
income taxes............ 15,057 19,637 23,418 16,155 2,965 (7,439) 2,356 (8,545) (5,436)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)......... $ 26,767 $ 34,909 $ 42,465 $ 30,001 $ 11,861 $ (7,460) $ 4,783 $(19,939) $(14,165)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======= ======== ========
OTHER DATA:
EBITDA(1)................. $ 55,489 $ 72,908 $ 90,421 $ 92,028 $ 75,684 $ 75,684 $21,694 $(10,790) $ 2,514(2)
Depreciation.............. 16,128 20,858 27,214 48,315 63,750 63,750 15,150 16,015 16,015
Capital expenditures...... 39,658 60,708 79,346 117,065 38,437 38,437 11,991 7,260 7,260
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(3).............. 53.9x 79.7x 81.3x 56.4x 18.2x N/M 34.1x N/M N/M
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE> 15
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HISTORICAL HISTORICAL
------------ -------------
DECEMBER 31, APRIL 5,
1997 1998
------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD):
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments........... $106,311 $66,890
Working capital............................................. 131,594 93,791
Net property, plant and equipment........................... 223,577 214,962
Total assets................................................ 415,639 373,105
Total debt.................................................. -- 280,000
Stockholders' equity........................................ 340,482 23,204
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) EBITDA represents earnings (losses) from operations before interest income
and expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs), income
taxes, depreciation, amortization of goodwill and non-cash stock option
compensation expenses. EBITDA is presented because it is a widely accepted
financial indicator of a leveraged company's ability to service and/or incur
indebtedness and because management believes that EBITDA is a relevant
measure of the Issuer's ability to generate cash without regard to the
Issuer's capital structure or working capital needs. EBITDA as presented may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies,
depending upon the non-cash charges included. When evaluating EBITDA,
investors should consider that EBITDA (i) should not be considered in
isolation but together with other factors which may influence operating and
investing activities, such as changes in operating assets and liabilities
and purchases of property and equipment; (ii) is not a measure of
performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; (iii) should not be construed as an alternative or substitute
for income from operations, net income or cash flows from operating
activities in analyzing the Issuer's operating performance, financial
position or cash flows; and (iv) should not be used as an indicator of the
Issuer's operating performance or as a measure of its liquidity.
(2) Reflects the elimination of certain non-recurring Merger related expenses.
See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Information."
(3) For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, (i)
earnings consist of income before income taxes, plus fixed charges and (ii)
fixed charges consist of interest expense incurred and the estimated portion
of rental expense deemed by Zilog to be representative of the interest
factor of rental payments under operating leases. The pro forma ratio of
earnings to fixed charges reflects the interest expense on the Notes, as if
the Notes had been issued at the beginning of the respective periods
presented. On a pro forma basis, for the year ended December 31, 1997 and
the three months ended April 5, 1998, the deficiency of earnings from
continuing operations before income taxes to cover fixed charges was $14.9
million and $19.6 million, respectively. For the historical three months
ended April 5, 1998, the deficiency of earnings from continuing operations
before income taxes to cover fixed charges was $28.5 million.
14
<PAGE> 16
RISK FACTORS
Prospective holders of the New Notes should carefully consider the
following factors in addition to the other information contained and
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus before making an investment in the
Notes offered hereby. This Prospectus contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act. Actual
results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors and uncertainties set forth below and
elsewhere in this Prospectus. See "Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements."
SUBSTANTIAL LEVERAGE AND ABILITY TO SERVICE INDEBTEDNESS
The Issuer has incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with the
Recapitalization. At April 5, 1998, Zilog had (i) $280 million of consolidated
long-term indebtedness and (ii) equity of $23.2 million. On a pro forma basis,
the Issuer's earnings would have been insufficient to cover fixed charges by
$19.6 million for the three months ended April 5, 1998.
The Issuer and its Subsidiaries also may incur additional indebtedness in
the future, subject to the limitations imposed by the Indenture dated as of
February 27, 1998 by and among the Issuer, certain of its subsidiaries and the
Trustee (the "Indenture"). The high degree to which the Issuer is leveraged may
have important consequences to Zilog, including the following: (i) Zilog's
ability to obtain additional financing for future acquisitions (if any), working
capital, capital expenditures, product development or other purposes may be
impaired or any such financing may not be available on terms favorable to Zilog;
(ii) a substantial portion of Zilog's cash flow available from operations after
satisfying certain liabilities arising in the ordinary course of business will
be dedicated to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing funds that would
otherwise be available to Zilog; (iii) a decrease in net operating cash flows or
an increase in expenses of Zilog could make it difficult for Zilog to meet its
debt service requirements or force it to modify its operations; and (iv) high
leverage may place Zilog at a competitive disadvantage, limit its flexibility in
reacting to changes in its operating environment and make it vulnerable to a
downturn in its business or the economy generally. Moreover, the degree to which
the Issuer is leveraged could prevent it from repurchasing all of the New Notes
tendered to it upon the occurrence of a Change of Control. See "-- Ability to
Effect Repurchase of the New Notes upon Change of Control."
In order to satisfy the Issuer's obligations under the New Notes and any
future obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Issuer will be
required to generate substantial operating cash flow. The ability of the Issuer
to meet debt service and other obligations or to refinance any such obligation
will depend on the future performance of the Issuer, which will be subject to
prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors,
certain of which may be beyond the control of the Issuer. While the Issuer
believes that, based on current levels of operations and its business plan, it
will be able to meet its debt service and other obligations or to refinance its
indebtedness, there can be no assurances with respect thereto. See "Unaudited
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information" and "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and
Capital Resources' for information regarding the operating cash flow and debt
service obligations of the Issuer.
RISK OF NOT REALIZING COLLATERAL VALUE
No appraisals of any of the Collateral have been prepared by, or on behalf
of, the Issuer in connection with the sale of the New Notes. The proceeds from a
sale of the Collateral in the event of a foreclosure would depend on various
factors at the time of the sale, including the strength of the market for ASSPs
and general economic conditions, and whether certain components of the
Collateral could be sold intact or would have to be disassembled and sold in
parts, which would likely result in proceeds significantly lower than the
Issuer's investment. The Collateral is currently dedicated to the production of
ASSPs. Because significant time and expense would be required to reconfigure
certain operating facilities, the proceeds from a sale of the Collateral in a
foreclosure would likely be lower if few or none of the parties interested in
purchasing the Collateral intended to utilize the Collateral to produce ASSPs.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the proceeds of any sale of the
Collateral following a default would be sufficient to satisfy the aggregate
amounts due on the
15
<PAGE> 17
New Notes. If such proceeds were not sufficient to repay all such amounts,
holders of the New Notes (to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale
of the Collateral) would have only an unsecured claim against the Issuer's
remaining assets. See "Description of New Notes -- Security." In addition, the
ability of holders of New Notes to realize upon the Collateral may be subject to
certain federal bankruptcy law limitations in the event of a bankruptcy
involving the Issuer. See "Description of New Notes -- Certain Bankruptcy
Limitations."
RISKS IN CONNECTION WITH AN EVENT OF LOSS AFFECTING COLLATERAL
The New Notes are intended to be secured by liens on substantially all of
the Issuer's and its domestic subsidiaries (if any) real property and personal
property, including all plant and equipment at operating facilities, including
any insurance or condemnation proceeds resulting from an Event of Loss (as
herein defined) with respect to the Collateral. Such proceeds will be held in an
account with the Collateral Agent pending expenditure by the Issuer or until
used to redeem all or a portion of the New Notes. There is no statutory or
otherwise clearly established method for perfecting a security interest in such
an account under the law applicable to the Issuer Security Agreement, dated as
of February 27, 1998 by and between Zilog and the Trustee. Consequently, no
assurance can be given that the holders of the New Notes will obtain the benefit
of a valid and perfected security interest in any insurance or condemnation
proceeds resulting from an Event of Loss. See "Description of
Notes -- Security."
OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES; STRUCTURAL SUBORDINATION
Certain operations of the Issuer are conducted through its foreign
subsidiaries. Except to the extent the Issuer may itself be a creditor with
recognized claims against its foreign subsidiaries, the claims of creditors of
the foreign subsidiaries will have priority with respect to the assets and
earnings of the foreign subsidiaries over the claims of creditors of the Issuer,
including holders of the New Notes, even though subsidiary obligations do not
constitute senior indebtedness of the Issuer. As of April 5, 1998, the
indebtedness (including trade payables and capital lease obligations) of the
Issuer's foreign subsidiaries was $1.9 million. See "Description of New
Notes -- Ranking."
RECENT AND ANTICIPATED OPERATING RESULTS
Zilog's operating results are affected by a wide variety of factors which
could have a material adverse effect on it including, but not limited to,
Zilog's ability to introduce new products and technologies on a timely basis,
changes in product mix or fluctuations in manufacturing yields which affect
Zilog's gross margins, market acceptance of Zilog's and its customers' products,
the level of orders that are received and can be shipped in a quarter, customer
order patterns and seasonality, cyclicality in the semiconductor industry,
increases in freight costs, gain or loss of a significant customer and whether
Zilog's customers buy from a distributor or directly from Zilog. Certain of the
Issuer's products have sustained decreases in average selling prices and the
Issuer has sustained product mix shifts that have caused average selling prices
of Zilog's products in the aggregate to decrease by 24% in 1997 and this trend
may continue. Significant reductions in selling prices may have a material
adverse effect on the Issuer. Zilog will likely experience substantial
period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results due to general
industry conditions including cyclical periods of diminished product demand,
accelerated erosion of average selling prices and production over-capacity or
events occurring in the United States economy or the economies of the worldwide
markets Zilog serves. A significant decline in demand for Zilog's products could
have a material adverse effect on the Issuer, and there can be no assurance that
any new products will receive or maintain substantial market acceptance.
Zilog's revenue and EBITDA have declined from $298.4 million and $92.0
million, respectively, for 1996 to $261.1 million and $75.7 million,
respectively, for 1997. For the three months ended April 5, 1998, Zilog had
revenues of $49.5 million and pro forma EBITDA of $2.5 million. Although the
Issuer believes that it has developed a business strategy that will improve its
operating performance, it is anticipated that revenue and EBITDA will decline
significantly in 1998 while this business strategy is being implemented. Many of
the factors which affect the Issuer's operating performance are outside the
Issuer's control and there can be no assurance that the Issuer's business
strategy will be successful or that results of operations will not continue to
16
<PAGE> 18
decline. Implementation of the Issuer's business plan requires significant
expenditures and there can be no assurance that the Issuer will be in a position
to implement it fully or that such expenditures will be offset by any increase
in revenue. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources." Continued significant
declines in operating performance could have a material adverse effect on the
Issuer and its ability to meet its debt service and other obligations.
During the second half of 1997 and the first half of 1998, Zilog
experienced a general decline in revenue consistent with the overall decline in
the current semiconductor marketplace. Similar to other semiconductor companies,
the Company is considering implementation of certain cost-cutting measures which
may include, but are not limited to, the following: refocusing of business
priorities; renegotiation with vendors and service providers to lower the costs
of materials and services; reallocation of personnel and responsibilities to
better utilize human resources; partnering to better utilize assets; reductions
in workforce; changes of manufacturing mix; increased use of subcontractors or
foundry for greater efficiency and lower short term costs; changes in shift
structures; and temporary plant shutdowns. In addition, Zilog is considering
realignment of capital expenditures consistent with its current level of
business.
In connection with the Recapitalization, Zilog incurred a significant
amount of non-recurring expenses, which may result in a decrease in Zilog's
current cash balance and interest income as compared to those of previous
periods. See "The Recapitalization."
THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY
The semiconductor industry has been characterized by cyclicality. The
industry has experienced significant economic downturns at various times in the
last three decades, characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated
erosion of average selling prices and production over-capacity. During 1995, the
semiconductor industry in general, including Zilog, experienced a period of
increased demand. During 1996, the industry experienced a slowdown from the
growth levels of 1995. Zilog experienced this slowdown during the last two
quarters of 1996. Additionally, during 1997, Zilog's revenue and profit were
lower than their respective levels in 1996 and there can be no assurance that
revenue and profit will return to historic levels. Zilog will likely experience
substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results due to
general industry conditions or events occurring in the general economy. The
fluctuations are difficult to foresee and there can be no assurance that future
fluctuations will not be more severe or prolonged or otherwise would not have a
material adverse effect on the Issuer.
Certain of Zilog's products are incorporated into printers, mouse-type
pointing devices, keyboards and modems. As a result, a slowdown in the demand
for personal computers and related peripherals could adversely affect Zilog's
operating results. A significant portion of Zilog sales are to the consumer
electronics markets for use in products such as television sets, infrared remote
controls and telephone answering machines. The consumer electronics markets are
volatile and rapid changes in customer preferences for electronics products
could have a material adverse effect on Zilog.
DEPENDENCE ON NEW PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES
Zilog's operating results will depend to a significant extent on its
ability to continue to introduce new products. The success of new product
introductions is dependent on several factors, including proper new product
selection, timely completion and introduction of new product designs, complexity
of the new products to be designed and manufactured, development of support
tools and collateral literature that make complex new products easy for
engineers to understand and use and market acceptance of customers' end
products. There can be no assurance that any new products will receive or
maintain substantial market acceptance. The Issuer's new business strategy
includes increased focus on design wins. However, there is a substantial delay
between a design win and sales of new products. Any such sales are subject to
the success or failure of the customer's product. There can be no assurance that
the Issuer will successfully identify new product opportunities and develop and
bring new products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner, or that
products or technologies developed by others will not render the Issuer's
products or technologies obsolete or
17
<PAGE> 19
noncompetitive. A fundamental shift in technology in the Issuer's product
markets could have a material adverse effect on the Issuer.
NEW MANAGEMENT AND KEY PERSONNEL
As of February 27, 1998, upon completion of the Recapitalization, Curtis J.
Crawford became President and CEO of Zilog, replacing Dr. Edgar Sack, the former
CEO. Although Mr. Crawford has significant experience in the industry in which
Zilog competes, there can be no assurance that this management transition and
the implementation of a new management strategy will not adversely affect
operating results. In addition, the Issuer depends upon its ability to hire and
retain qualified technical, sales and management personnel. The competition for
such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Issuer will be
successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
In 1997, the Issuer's 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 44%
of the Issuer's total revenue, although no single customer accounted for more
than 8% of the Issuer's total revenue. Particular customers may change from
period to period but the Issuer expects that sales to a limited number of
customers will continue to account for a significant percentage of its revenue
in any particular period for the foreseeable future. The Issuer has no long-term
contracts with its customers and there can be no assurance that its current
customers will place additional orders, or that the Issuer will obtain orders of
similar magnitude from other customers. The loss of one or more major customers
or any reduction, delay or cancellation of orders by any such customer or the
failure of the Issuer to market successfully to new customers, could have a
material adverse effect on the Issuer. During 1997, purchases by a major
customer, which had accounted for approximately 13% of the Issuer's total
revenue in 1996, declined to approximately 6% of the Issuer's total revenue in
1997. This decline was primarily attributable to a technology shift at the
customer resulting in a product that did not require a controller. There can be
no assurance that sales to one or more significant customers will not decline in
the future or that any such decline will not have a material adverse effect on
the Issuer.
PRODUCTION YIELDS AND MANUFACTURING RISKS; NEW WAFER FABRICATION FACILITY
The manufacture of semiconductor products is highly complex and production
yields are sensitive to a wide variety of factors, including the level of
contaminants in the manufacturing environment, impurities in the materials used
and the performance of personnel and equipment. In addition, as is common in the
semiconductor industry, Zilog has from time to time experienced difficulty in
beginning production at new facilities or in effecting transitions to new
manufacturing processes and, consequently, has suffered delays in product
deliveries or reduced yields. Zilog believes that an important competitive
factor will be its ability to continue to successfully increase production
capacity to meet customer demand and shorten delivery time. No assurance can be
given that Zilog or its outside wafer foundries will not experience production
yield problems in the future which could have a material adverse effect on the
Issuer. While the Issuer believes its manufacturing capacity to be sufficient,
the failure to increase production capacity through the successful and efficient
expansion of production at its new facility in Nampa, Idaho or to obtain wafers
from outside suppliers as needed during periods of increased demand could have a
material adverse effect on the Issuer.
Zilog's future success is dependent upon its ability to develop and
implement new design and process technologies. Semiconductor design and process
methodologies are subject to rapid technological change, requiring large
expenditures for research and development. Most new products are extremely
complex in design and many use Zilog's 0.65 micron CMOS process. Zilog has
developed a 0.35 micron CMOS process, and the first test wafers in this process
were produced in January 1998. A failure to make a successful transition to the
0.35 micron CMOS process could have a material adverse effect on the Issuer.
Manufacture of large complex die involves a significant technological risk. The
failure to complete new product designs in time to meet market requirements and
achieve volume production of new products at acceptable yields using the new
manufacturing processes would have a material adverse effect on the Issuer. See
"Business -- Research and Development."
18
<PAGE> 20
Zilog also uses outside contract assemblers for packaging a portion of its
production. Shortages in contract assembly capacity could adversely impact
Zilog's financial results. Should Zilog be unable to obtain additional assembly
capacity, Zilog's ability to achieve continued revenue growth may be restricted.
Shortage of product could also result in the loss of customers. See
"Business -- Manufacturing."
COMPETITION
The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by
price erosion, rapid technological change and heightened foreign competition in
many markets. The industry consists of major domestic and international
semiconductor companies, many of which have substantially greater financial and
other resources than Zilog with which to pursue engineering, manufacturing,
marketing and distribution of their products. Emerging companies are also
increasing their participation in the semiconductor market. The ability of Zilog
to compete successfully in its markets depends on factors both within and
outside of its control including, but not limited to, success in designing and
manufacturing new products that implement new technologies, protection of the
Issuer products by effective utilization of intellectual property laws, product
quality, reliability, ease of use, price, diversity of product line, efficiency
of production, the pace at which customers incorporate Zilog's microprocessors,
microcontrollers and digital signal processors into their products, success of
competitors' products and general economic conditions. See
"Business -- Competition."
EXPORT SALES; INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Approximately 59% of Zilog's sales in 1997 were to foreign customers and
Zilog expects that export sales will continue to represent a significant portion
of sales, although there can be no assurance that export sales, as a percentage
of net sales, will remain at current levels. Beginning in the fourth quarter of
1997, certain countries in Asia, which accounted for approximately 42% of
Zilog's 1997 revenue, experienced general market instability characterized by a
substantial decrease in demand that resulted in significant capital constraints
throughout the region. In many cases, these constraints were exacerbated by the
continuing need of businesses in the region to service indebtedness denominated
in dollars or other foreign currencies. As a result, many businesses in the
region have explored ways to preserve capital, including reducing capital
investment, reducing working capital, outsourcing manufacturing functions,
selling assets and discontinuing lines of business. In addition, substantial
devaluations of local currencies have significantly improved the competitive
position of certain competitors of the Issuer that operate in the affected
regions. The Issuer believes that this instability did not have a material
effect on the Issuer's revenue in 1997. During the first half of 1998, certain
of the Issuer's customers in these regions have significantly delayed purchases
of the Issuer's products, significantly reduced the production of products which
utilize the Issuer's ASSPs or have purchased ASSPs from the Issuer's competitors
that operate in the affected regions. There can be no assurance that this
instability will not continue to have a material adverse effect on the Issuer.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Recent Developments -- Asian Revenue."
Zilog purchases a substantial portion of its raw materials and equipment
from foreign suppliers. While Zilog's export sales are primarily United States
Dollar denominated transactions, Zilog is subject to the risks of conducting
business internationally, including unexpected changes in, or impositions of,
legislative or regulatory requirements, fluctuations in the United States dollar
against foreign currencies, which could increase the sales price in local
currencies of Zilog's products in foreign markets or increase the cost of wafers
purchased by Zilog, delays resulting from difficulty in obtaining export
licenses for certain technology, tariffs and other barriers and restrictions,
potentially longer payment cycles, greater difficulty in accounts receivable
collection, potentially adverse taxes and the burdens of complying with a
variety of foreign laws. In addition, Zilog is subject to general geopolitical
risks, such as political and economic instability and changes in diplomatic and
trade relationships, which could affect, among other things, customers' ordering
patterns and inventory levels. There can be no assurance that such regulatory,
geopolitical, economic and other factors will not adversely impact Zilog in the
future or require the Issuer to modify its current business practices. In
addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect Zilog's
intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United
States.
19
<PAGE> 21
Zilog operates two primary assembly and test facilities in the Philippines
through two wholly owned subsidiaries. Zilog has a significant capital
investment at these facilities. Zilog's reliance on personnel and assets and its
maintenance of inventories at these facilities entails certain political and
economic risks, including political instability and expropriation, currency
controls and exchange fluctuations, as well as changes in tax laws, tariff and
freight rates. Political stability in the Philippines appears to have increased
markedly during the past three years, but no assurances of continued stability
can be given. Zilog has not experienced any significant interruptions in its
business operations in the Philippines to date. Nonetheless, any loss or
disruption of production in the Philippines could have a material adverse effect
on the Issuer, particularly if operations or air transportation from the
Philippines were disrupted for a substantial period of time.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Zilog's ability to compete will be affected by its ability to protect its
proprietary information. Zilog relies primarily on its trade secrets and
technological know-how in the conduct of its business. There can be no assurance
that the steps taken by Zilog to protect its intellectual property will be
adequate to prevent misappropriation of its technology or that Zilog's
competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially
equivalent or superior to Zilog's technology. The semiconductor industry is
characterized by frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and
other intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that third parties
will not assert additional claims or initiate litigation against Zilog, its
foundries or its customers with respect to existing or future products. In
addition, Zilog may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for
infringement of Zilog's proprietary rights or to determine the scope and
validity of the proprietary rights of Zilog or others. Litigation by or against
Zilog could result in significant expense to Zilog and divert the efforts of
Zilog's technical and management personnel, whether or not litigation is
determined in favor of Zilog. In the event of an adverse result in any such
litigation, Zilog could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the
manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale and importation of infringing products,
expend significant resources to develop or obtain non-infringing technology,
discontinue the use of certain processes, or obtain licenses to the technology
which is the subject of the litigation. There can be no assurance that Zilog
would be successful in such development or acquisition or that any such
licenses, if available, would be available on commercially reasonable terms, and
any such development or acquisition could require expenditures by Zilog of
substantial time and other resources. Any such litigation or adverse result
therefrom could have an adverse effect on Zilog.
Zilog has been notified by three parties that it may be infringing certain
patent ownership and other intellectual property rights. In the event Zilog
determines that such notices may involve meritorious claims, Zilog may seek a
license. Based on industry practice, Zilog believes that in most cases any
necessary licenses or other rights could be obtained on commercially reasonable
terms. However, no assurance can be given that licenses could be obtained on
acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. The failure to obtain
necessary licenses or other rights or the advent of litigation arising out of
such claims could have a material adverse effect on Zilog. See
"Business -- Patents and Licenses."
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
Zilog is subject to a variety of government regulations related to the
discharge or disposal of hazardous materials used in its manufacturing process.
Although Zilog believes that it is in substantial compliance with all relevant
regulations and has all permits necessary to conduct its business, the failure
to comply with present or future regulations or the loss of any permit could
result in fines being imposed on Zilog, limitation or suspension of production
or cessation of operations. Compliance with any such future regulations could
require Zilog to acquire additional equipment or to incur substantial other
expenses. Any failure by Zilog to control the use of, or adequately restrict the
discharge of, hazardous materials could subject it to future liabilities.
20
<PAGE> 22
In 1996, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho entered orders
approving a settlement in the lawsuit entitled Tsotung Ko, et al. v. Zilog, Inc.
In the suit, 31 plaintiffs alleged that the Issuer endangered their health and
safety by chemical exposures at one of the Issuer's Nampa, Idaho facilities. In
addition, the plaintiffs alleged that the Issuer discriminated against them
after they were injured by chemical exposures. Although the Issuer made payments
in connection with the settlement, the Issuer strongly denied these allegations.
In January 1998, USA Today published a series of articles about
environmental and employee health and safety conditions at semiconductor
manufacturing facilities. The Issuer's operations during 1993 and 1994 and the
Tsotung Ko lawsuit were the primary subject of one article and were mentioned in
other articles. Since 1993, the Issuer has constructed its MOD III facility,
expanded MOD II, closed MOD I and has upgraded the environmental monitoring and
control equipment at its MOD II facility. The Issuer believes it is in
substantial compliance with all applicable environmental and employee health and
safety regulations. However, this recent public attention focused on the
environmental and employee health and safety conditions at the Issuer's
facilities could increase the incidence of environmental or employee health and
safety complaints or governmental investigations into the Issuer's operations.
Zilog recently underwent a multimedia inspection by the Environmental Protection
Agency and various state and local agencies and a separate detailed inspection
by OSHA. While the Issuer has not received all of the final reports from these
investigations, the Issuer believes that it remains in compliance with all
material environmental, health and safety regulations and that the foregoing
inspections will not result in any fines or penalties for non-compliance with
such regulations. There can be no assurance that the Issuer will not incur
significant expense in connection with other governmental investigations and/or
environmental or employee health and safety matters.
ABILITY TO EFFECT REPURCHASE OF THE NEW NOTES UPON CHANGE OF CONTROL
Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Issuer will be required to
make an offer to repurchase the New Notes at a price equal to 101% of the
principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated
Damages, if any, to the date of repurchase. Certain events constituting a Change
of Control could result in a default under future indebtedness of the Issuer.
There can be no assurance that the Issuer would have sufficient resources
available at the time of any Change of Control to repurchase the New Notes
and/or to pay its obligations under such indebtedness.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES
In certain circumstances, the incurrence by the Issuer of indebtedness such
as the New Notes may be subject to review under relevant state and federal
fraudulent conveyance laws if a bankruptcy case or lawsuit is commenced by or on
behalf of unpaid creditors of the Issuer. Under these laws, if a court were to
find that, after giving effect to the sale of the New Notes and the application
of the net proceeds therefrom, either (a) the Issuer incurred such indebtedness
with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or contemplated
insolvency with a design to prefer one or more creditors to the exclusion in
whole or in part of others or (b) the Issuer received less than reasonably
equivalent value or consideration for incurring such indebtedness and (i) was
insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of such transaction, (ii) was engaged
in a business or transaction for which the assets remaining with the Issuer
constituted unreasonably small capital or (iii) intended to incur, or believed
that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they matured,
such court may subordinate such indebtedness to presently existing and future
indebtedness of the Issuer, avoid the issuance of such indebtedness and direct
the repayment of any amounts paid thereunder to the Issuer's creditors or take
other action detrimental to the holders of such indebtedness.
In certain circumstances, the incurrence by a Guarantor of a Guarantee (as
defined herein) may be subject to review under relevant state and federal
fraudulent conveyance laws if a bankruptcy case or lawsuit is commenced by or on
behalf of unpaid creditors of such Guarantor. Under these laws, if a court were
to find that either (a) a Guarantee was incurred by a Guarantor with the intent
of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or such Guarantor contemplated
insolvency with a design to prefer one or more creditors to the exclusion in
whole or in part of others or (b) such Guarantor received less than reasonably
equivalent value or
21
<PAGE> 23
consideration for incurring such Guarantee and (i) was insolvent or rendered
insolvent by reason of such transaction, (ii) was engaged in a business or
transaction for which the assets remaining with such Guarantor constituted
unreasonably small capital or (iii) intended to incur, or believed that it would
incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they matured, such court
may subordinate such Guarantee to presently existing and future indebtedness of
such Guarantor, avoid the issuance of such Guarantee and direct the repayment of
any amounts paid thereunder to such Guarantor's creditors or take other action
detrimental to the holders of such Guarantee. A legal challenge of a Guarantee
on fraudulent conveyance grounds, may, among other things, focus on the
benefits, if any, realized by the Guarantor as a result of the issuance of the
New Notes by the Issuer.
The measures of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing considerations
will vary depending upon the law applied in any proceeding with respect to the
foregoing. Generally, however, the Issuer or a Guarantor would be considered
insolvent if (i) the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, were
greater than the salable value of all of its assets at a fair valuation or if
the present fair salable value of its assets were less than the amount that
would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including
contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature or (ii) it could not
pay its debts as they become due. Similar fraudulent conveyance and other
concerns may be applicable to the Subsidiary Guarantees to be issued by certain
of the Issuer's subsidiaries and similar and other concerns as to enforceability
may apply to Subsidiary Guarantees that may be granted in the future.
To the extent that any Guarantee was voided as a fraudulent conveyance or
held unenforceable for any other reason, holders of the New Notes would cease to
have any claim in respect of such Guarantee and would be creditors solely of the
Issuer and any Guarantor whose Guarantee was not voided or held unenforceable.
In such event, the claims of the holders of the applicable New Notes against the
issuer of an invalid Guarantee would be subject to the prior payment of all
liabilities and preferred stock claims of such Guarantor. There can be no
assurance that, after providing for all prior claims and preferred stock
interests, if any, there would be sufficient assets to satisfy the claims of the
holders of the applicable New Notes relating to any voided portions of any of
the Guarantees.
Based upon financial and other information currently available to it,
management of the Issuer believes that the New Notes and the Guarantees are
being incurred for proper purposes and in good faith and that, at the time the
New Notes and the Guarantees are issued, the Issuer and each Guarantor, as the
case may be, were (i) neither insolvent nor rendered insolvent thereby, (ii) in
possession of sufficient capital to run its business effectively and (iii)
incurring debts within its ability to pay as the same mature or become due. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources." In reaching these conclusions,
the Issuer has relied upon various valuations and estimates of future cash flow
that necessarily involve a number of assumptions and choices of methodology. No
assurance can be given, however, that the assumptions and methodologies chosen
by the Issuer would be adopted by a court or that a court would concur with the
Issuer's conclusions.
SECURITIES CLASS ACTION AND OTHER LEGAL MATTERS
Zilog has been named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit
which was filed on January 23, 1998 in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California. Certain executive officers of the Issuer are
also named as defendants. The plaintiff purports to represent a class of all
persons who purchased the Issuer's Common Stock between June 30, 1997 and
November 20, 1997 (the "Class Period"). The complaint alleges that the Issuer
and certain of its executive officers made false and misleading statements
regarding the Issuer that caused the market price of its Common Stock to be
"artificially inflated" during the Class Period. The complaint does not specify
the amount of damages sought. The Issuer believes the lawsuit lacks merit and
intends to defend it vigorously. There can be no assurance that the Issuer will
prevail in its defense of the lawsuit or that any judgment against the Issuer
will not be material.
Zilog is participating in other litigation and responding to claims arising
in the ordinary course of business. Zilog intends to defend itself vigorously in
these matters. Zilog's management believes that it is
22
<PAGE> 24
unlikely that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect
on the Issuer, although there can be no assurance in this regard.
RESTRICTIVE DEBT COVENANTS
The Indenture contains a number of significant covenants that, among other
things, restrict the ability of the Issuer to dispose of assets, incur
additional indebtedness, prepay other indebtedness (including the New Notes) or
amend certain debt instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, enter
into sale and leaseback transactions, make investments, loans or advances, make
acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted
by Issuer or its subsidiaries, make capital expenditures or engage in certain
transactions with affiliates and otherwise restrict certain corporate
activities. In addition, under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Issuer is
required to comply with specified financial ratios and tests, including minimum
interest coverage ratios, leverage ratios below a specified maximum, minimum net
worth levels and minimum ratios of inventory to senior debt. See "Description of
the New Notes" and "Description of Revolving Credit Facility."
Zilog's ability to comply with such agreements may be affected by events
beyond its control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry
conditions. The breach of any of such covenants or restrictions could result in
a default under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Indenture, which would
permit the senior lenders, or the holders of the New Notes, to declare all
amounts borrowed thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and
unpaid interest, and the commitments of the senior lenders to make further
extensions of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility could be terminated. If
the Issuer were unable to repay its indebtedness to its senior lenders, such
lenders could proceed against the collateral securing such indebtedness as
described under "Description of the Issuer Indebtedness."
PROCEDURES FOR TENDER OF OLD NOTES
The New Notes will be issued in exchange for Old Notes only after timely
receipt by the Exchange Agent of such Old Notes, a properly completed and duly
executed Letter of Transmittal and all other required documents. Therefore,
holders of Old Notes desiring to tender such Old Notes in exchange for New Notes
should allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery. Failure by a holder in
following such procedures may result in delay in receiving an Exchange Note on a
timely basis. Neither the Exchange Agent nor the Issuer is under any duty to
give notification of defects or irregularities with respect to tenders of Old
Notes for exchange. Any holder of Old Notes who tenders in the Exchange Offer
for the purpose of participating in a distribution of the New Notes will be
required to comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of
the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction. Each broker-dealer
that receives New Notes for its own account in exchange for Old Notes, where
such Old Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making
activities or any other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of New Notes. See "The
Exchange Offer -- Procedures for Tendering" and "Plan of Distribution."
CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO EXCHANGE OLD NOTES
Holders of Old Notes who do not exchange their Old Notes for New Notes
pursuant to the Exchange Offer will continue to be subject to the restrictions
on transfer of such Old Notes as set forth in the legend thereon as a
consequence of the issuance of the Old Notes pursuant to exemptions from, or in
transactions not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws. In general, the Old Notes may not be
offered or sold, unless registered under the Securities Act, except pursuant to
an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. The Issuer does not currently anticipate that
it will register the Old Notes under the Securities Act. To the extent that Old
Notes are tendered and accepted in the Exchange Offer, the trading market for
untendered and tendered but unaccepted Old Notes could be adversely affected.
23
<PAGE> 25
LACK OF PUBLIC MARKET FOR THE NOTES
The Old Notes have been designated as eligible for trading in the PORTAL
market. Prior to this Exchange Offer, there has been no public market for the
New Notes. If such a market were to develop, the New Notes could trade at prices
that may be higher or lower than their principal amount. The Issuer does not
intend to apply for listing of the New Notes on any securities exchange or for
quotation of the New Notes on The Nasdaq Stock Market. The Initial Purchasers
have previously made a market in the Old Notes, and the Issuer has been advised
that the Initial Purchasers currently intend to make a market in the New Notes,
as permitted by applicable laws and regulations, after consummation of the
Exchange Offer. The Initial Purchasers are not obligated, however, to make a
market in the Old Notes or the New Notes and any such market making activity may
be discontinued at any time without notice at the sole discretion of the Initial
Purchasers. There can be no assurance as to the liquidity of the public market
for the New Notes or that any active public market for the New Notes will
develop or continue. If an active public market does not develop or continue,
the market price and liquidity of the New Notes may be adversely affected.
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
The summary herein of certain provisions of the Registration Rights
Agreement does not purport to be complete and reference is made to the
provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement, which has been filed as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement and a copy of which is available as set
forth under the heading "Available Information."
TERMS OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER
In connection with the issuance of the Old Notes pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement by and among the Issuer and the Initial Purchasers, the Initial
Purchasers and their respective assignees became entitled to the benefits of the
Registration Rights Agreement.
Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Issuer is required to file
within 60 days after February 27, 1998 (the date the Registration Rights
Agreement was entered into (the "Closing Date")) a registration statement (the
"Exchange Offer Registration Statement") for a registered exchange offer with
respect to an issue of new notes identical in all material respects to the Old
Notes except that the new notes shall contain no restrictive legend thereon.
Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Issuer is required to (i) cause the
Exchange Offer Registration Statement to be filed with the Commission no later
than 60 days after the Closing Date, (ii) use its best efforts to cause such
Exchange Offer Registration Statement to become effective no later than 135 days
after the Closing Date, (iii) use its best efforts to keep the Exchange Offer
open for at least 20 Business Days (or longer if required by applicable law),
(iv) use its best efforts to consummate the Exchange Offer as soon as
practicable following the date on which the Exchange Offer Registration
Statement is declared effective by the Commission, but in no event later than
180 days after the Closing Date and (v) cause the Exchange Offer to comply with
all applicable federal and state securities laws. The Exchange Offer being made
hereby, if commenced and consummated within the time periods described in this
paragraph, will satisfy those requirements under the Registration Rights
Agreement.
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Prospectus
and in the Letter of Transmittal, all Old Notes validly tendered and not
withdrawn prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the Expiration Date will be
accepted for exchange. New Notes of the same class will be issued in exchange
for an equal principal amount of outstanding Old Notes accepted in the Exchange
Offer. Old Notes may be tendered only in integral multiples of $1,000. This
Prospectus, together with the Letter of Transmittal, is being sent to all
registered holders as of July 10, 1998. The Exchange Offer is not conditioned
upon any minimum principal amount of Old Notes being tendered in exchange.
However, the obligation to accept Old Notes for exchange pursuant to the
Exchange Offer is subject to certain conditions as set forth herein under
"-- Conditions."
Old Notes shall be deemed to have been accepted as validly tendered when,
as and if the Trustee has given oral or written notice thereof to the Exchange
Agent. The Exchange Agent will act as agent for the
24
<PAGE> 26
tendering holders of Old Notes for the purposes of receiving the New Notes and
delivering New Notes to such holders.
Based on interpretations by the staff of the Commission, as set forth in
no-action letters issued to third parties, including the Exchange Offer
No-Action Letters, the Issuer believes that the New Notes issued pursuant to the
Exchange Offer may be offered for resale, resold or otherwise transferred by
each holder thereof (other than a broker-dealer who acquires such New Notes
directly from the Issuer for resale pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities
Act or any other available exemption under the Securities Act and other than any
holder that is an "affiliate" (as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act)
of the Issuer without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery
provisions of the Securities Act, provided that such New Notes are acquired in
the ordinary course of such holder's business and such holder is not engaged in,
and does not intend to engage in, a distribution of such New Notes and has no
arrangement with any person to participate in a distribution of such New Notes.
By tendering the Old Notes in exchange for New Notes, each holder, other than a
broker-dealer, will represent to the Issuer that: (i) it is not an affiliate (as
defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Issuer; (ii) it is not a
broker-dealer tendering Old Notes acquired for its own account directly from the
Issuer; (iii) any New Notes to be received by it will be acquired in the
ordinary course of its business; and (iv) it is not engaged in, and does not
intend to engage in, a distribution of such New Notes and has no arrangement or
understanding to participate in a distribution of the New Notes. If a holder of
Old Notes is engaged in or intends to engage in a distribution of the New Notes
or has any arrangement or understanding with respect to the distribution of the
New Notes to be acquired pursuant to the Exchange Offer, such holder may not
rely on the applicable interpretations of the staff of the Commission and must
comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act in connection with any secondary resale transaction. Each
Participating Broker-Dealer that receives New Notes for its own account pursuant
to the Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in
connection with any resale of such New Notes. The Letter of Transmittal states
that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a Participating
Broker-Dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the
meaning of the Securities Act. This Prospectus, as it may be amended or
supplemented from time to time, may be used by a Participating Broker-Dealer in
connection with resales of New Notes received in exchange for Old Notes where
such Old Notes were acquired by such Participating Broker-Dealer as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities. The Issuer has agreed that
it will make this Prospectus available to any Participating Broker-Dealer for a
period of time not to exceed one year after the date on which the Exchange Offer
is consummated for use in connection with any such resale. See "Plan of
Distribution."
In the event that (i) any changes in law or the applicable interpretations
of the staff of the Commission do not permit the Issuer to effect the Exchange
Offer, or (ii) if any holder of Old Notes shall notify the Issuer within 20
business days following the consummation of the Exchange Offer that (A) such
holder was prohibited by law or Commission policy from participating in the
Exchange Offer or (B) such holder may not resell the New Notes acquired by it in
the Exchange Offer to the public without delivering a prospectus and the
prospectus contained in the Exchange Offer Registration Statement is not
appropriate or available for such resales by such holder or (C) such holder is a
broker-dealer and holds Old Notes acquired directly from the Issuer or one of
its affiliates, then the Issuer shall (x) cause to be filed a shelf registration
statement pursuant to Rule 415 under the Act (the "Shelf Registration
Statement") on or prior to 60 days after the date on which the Issuer determines
that it is not required to file the Exchange Offer Registration Statement
pursuant to clause (i) above or 60 days after the date on which the Issuer
receives the notice specified in clause (ii) above and shall (y) use its best
efforts to cause such Shelf Registration Statement to become effective within
135 days after the date on which the Issuer becomes obligated to file such Shelf
Registration Statement. If, after the Issuer has filed an Exchange Offer
Registration Statement, the Issuer is required to file and make effective a
Shelf Registration Statement solely because the Exchange Offer shall not be
permitted under applicable federal law, then the filing of the Exchange Offer
Registration Statement shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of clause (x)
above. Such an event shall have no effect on the requirements of clause (y)
above. The Issuer shall use its best efforts to keep the Shelf Registration
Statement continuously effective, supplemented and amended to the extent
necessary to ensure that it is available for sales of Transfer Restricted
Securities (as defined below) by the holders thereof for a period of at least
two years following the date on which such Shelf Registration Statement first
becomes effective under the Securities Act. The term
25
<PAGE> 27
"Transfer Restricted Securities" means each Note, until the earliest to occur of
(a) the date on which such Note is exchanged in the Exchange Offer and entitled
to be resold to the public by the holder thereof without complying with the
prospectus delivery requirements of the Act, (b) the date on which such Note has
been disposed of in accordance with a Shelf Registration Statement, (c) the date
on which such Note is disposed of by a broker-dealer pursuant to the "Plan of
Distribution" contemplated by the Exchange Offer Registration Statement
(including delivery of the prospectus contained therein) or (d) the date on
which such Note is distributed to the public pursuant to Rule 144 under the Act.
If (i) the Exchange Offer Registration Statement or the Shelf Registration
Statement is not filed with the Commission on or prior to the date specified in
the Registration Rights Agreement, (ii) any such Registration Statement has not
been declared effective by the Commission on or prior to the date specified for
such effectiveness in the Registration Rights Agreement, (iii) the Exchange
Offer has not been consummated within 180 days after the Closing Date or (iv)
any Registration Statement required by the Registration Rights Agreement is
filed and declared effective but shall thereafter cease to be effective or fail
to be usable for its intended purpose without being succeeded immediately by a
post-effective amendment to such Registration Statement that cures such failure
and that is itself declared effective immediately (each such event referred to
in clauses (i) through (iv), a "Registration Default"), then the Issuer has
agreed to pay liquidated damages to each holder of Transfer Restricted
Securities. With respect to the first 90-day period immediately following the
occurrence of such Registration Default the liquidated damages shall equal $.05
per week per $1,000 in principal amount of Transfer Restricted Securities held
by such holder for each week or portion thereof that the Registration Default
continues. The amount of the liquidated damages shall increase by an additional
$.05 per week per $1,000 in principal amount of Transfer Restricted Securities
with respect to each subsequent 90-day period until all Registration Defaults
have been cured, up to a maximum amount of liquidated damages of $.25 per week
per $1,000 principal amount of Transfer Restricted Securities. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary set forth herein, (1) upon filing of the Exchange Offer
Registration Statement (and/or, if applicable, the Shelf Registration
Statement), in the case of (i) above, (2) upon the effectiveness of the Exchange
Offer Registration Statement (and/or, if applicable, the Shelf Registration
Statement), in the case of (ii) above, (3) upon consummation of the Exchange
Offer, in the case of (iii) above, or (4) upon the filing of a post-effective
amendment to the Registration Statement or an additional Registration Statement
that causes the Exchange Offer Registration Statement (and/or, if applicable,
the Shelf Registration Statement) to again be declared effective or made usable
in the case of (iv) above, the liquidated damages payable with respect to the
Transfer Restricted Securities as a result of such clause (i), (ii), (iii) or
(iv), as applicable, shall cease.
All accrued liquidated damages shall be paid to the holder of the global
note representing the Old Notes by wire transfer of immediately available funds
or by federal funds check and to holders of certificated securities by mailing
checks to their registered addresses on each June 15 and December 15. All
obligations of the Issuer set forth in the preceding paragraph that are
outstanding with respect to any Transfer Restricted Security at the time such
security ceases to be a Transfer Restricted Security shall survive until such
time as all such obligations with respect to such security shall have been
satisfied in full.
Upon consummation of the Exchange Offer, subject to certain exceptions,
holders of Old Notes who do not exchange their Old Notes for New Notes in the
Exchange Offer will no longer be entitled to registration rights and will not be
able to offer or sell their Old Notes, unless such Old Notes are subsequently
registered under the Securities Act (which, subject to certain limited
exceptions, the Issuer will have no obligation to do), except pursuant to an
exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. See "Risk Factors -- Risk Factors Relating to
the Notes -- Consequences of Failure to Exchange Old Notes."
EXPIRATION DATE; EXTENSIONS; AMENDMENTS; TERMINATION
The term "Expiration Date" shall mean August 7, 1998 (30 calendar days
following the commencement of the Exchange Offer), unless the Exchange Offer is
extended, if and as required by applicable law, in which case the term
"Expiration Date" shall mean the latest date to which the Exchange Offer is
extended.
26
<PAGE> 28
In order to extend the Expiration Date, the Issuer will notify the Exchange
Agent of any extension by oral or written notice and will notify the holders of
the Old Notes by means of a press release or other public announcement prior to
9:00 A.M., New York City time, on the next business day after the previously
scheduled Expiration Date.
The Issuer reserves the right (i) to delay acceptance of any Old Notes, to
extend the Exchange Offer or to terminate the Exchange Offer and not permit
acceptance of Old Notes not previously accepted if any of the conditions set
forth herein under "-- Conditions" shall have occurred and shall not have been
waived by the Issuer, by giving oral or written notice of such delay, extension
or termination to the Exchange Agent, or (ii) to amend the terms of the Exchange
Offer in any manner deemed by it to be advantageous to the holders of the Old
Notes. Any such delay in acceptance, extension, termination or amendment will be
followed as promptly as practicable by oral or written notice thereof to the
Exchange Agent. If the Exchange Offer is amended in a manner determined by the
Issuer to constitute a material change, the Issuer will promptly disclose such
amendment in a manner reasonably calculated to inform the holders of the Old
Notes of such amendment.
INTEREST ON THE NEW NOTES
The New Notes will accrue interest at a rate of 9 1/2%. Commencing
September 1, 1998, cash interest on the New Notes will accrue and be payable, at
a rate of 9 1/2% per annum, semi-annually in arrears on each March 1 and
September 1.
PROCEDURES FOR TENDERING
To tender in the Exchange Offer, a holder must complete, sign and date the
Letter of Transmittal, have the signatures thereon guaranteed if required by the
Letter of Transmittal, and mail or otherwise deliver such Letter of Transmittal,
together with any other required documents, to the Exchange Agent prior to 5:00
p.m., New York City time, on the Expiration Date. In addition, either (i) the
certificates for such Old Notes must be received by the Exchange Agent along
with the Letter of Transmittal, (ii) a timely confirmation of a book entry
transfer (a "Book-Entry Confirmation") of such Old Notes, if such procedure is
available, into the Exchange Agent's account at DTC (the "Book-Entry Transfer
Facility") pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer described below,
must be received by the Exchange Agent prior to the Expiration Date or (iii) the
holder must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below. THE
METHOD OF DELIVERY OF OLD NOTES, LETTERS OF TRANSMITTAL AND ALL OTHER REQUIRED
DOCUMENTS IS AT THE ELECTION AND RISK OF THE HOLDERS OF THE NOTES. IF SUCH
DELIVERY IS BY MAIL, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT REGISTERED MAIL, PROPERLY INSURED,
WITH RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, BE USED. IN ALL CASES, SUFFICIENT TIME SHOULD BE
ALLOWED TO ASSURE TIMELY DELIVERY. NO LETTERS OF TRANSMITTAL OR OLD NOTES SHOULD
BE SENT TO THE ISSUER. Delivery of all documents must be made to the Exchange
Agent at its address set forth below. Holders of Notes may also request their
respective brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or nominees to
effect such tender for such holders.
The tender by a holder of Old Notes will constitute an agreement between
such holder and the Issuer in accordance with the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein and in the Letter of Transmittal.
Only a holder of Old Notes may tender such Old Notes in the Exchange Offer.
The term "holder" with respect to the Exchange Offer means any person in whose
name Old Notes are registered on the books of the Issuer or any other person who
has obtained a properly completed bond power from the registered holder.
Any beneficial owner whose Old Notes are registered in the name of a
broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and who wishes
to tender should contact such registered holder promptly and instruct such
registered holder to tender on his behalf. If such beneficial owner wishes to
tender on his own behalf, such beneficial owner must, prior to completing and
executing the Letter of Transmittal and delivering his Old Notes, either make
appropriate arrangements to register ownership of the Old Notes in such owner's
name or obtain a properly completed bond power from the registered holder. The
transfer of registered ownership may take considerable time.
27
<PAGE> 29
Signatures on a Letter of Transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the
case may be, must be guaranteed by any member firm of a registered national
securities exchange or of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.,
a commercial bank or trust company having an office or correspondent in the
United States or an "eligible guarantor" institution within the meaning of Rule
17Ad-15 under the Exchange Act (each an "Eligible Institution") unless the Old
Notes tendered pursuant thereto are tendered (i) by a registered holder who has
not completed the box entitled "Special Issuance Instructions" or "Special
Delivery Instructions" on the Letter of Transmittal or (ii) for the account of
an Eligible Institution.
If the Letter of Transmittal is signed by a person other than the
registered holder of any Old Notes listed therein, such Old Notes must be
endorsed or accompanied by bond powers and a proxy which authorizes such person
to tender the Old Notes on behalf of the registered holder, in each case as the
name of the registered holder or holders appears on the Old Notes.
If the Letter of Transmittal or any Old Notes or bond powers are signed by
trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers of
corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, such
persons should so indicate when signing, and unless waived by the Issuer,
evidence satisfactory to the Issuer of their authority to so act must be
submitted with the Letter of Transmittal.
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including time of
receipt) and withdrawal of the tendered Old Notes will be determined by the
Issuer in its sole discretion, which determination will be final and binding.
The Issuer reserves the absolute right to reject any and all Old Notes not
properly tendered or any Old Notes which, if accepted, would, in the opinion of
counsel for the Issuer, be unlawful. The Issuer also reserves the absolute right
to waive any irregularities or conditions of tender as to particular Old Notes.
The Issuer's interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Exchange Offer
(including the instructions in the Letter of Transmittal) will be final and
binding on all parties. Unless waived, any defects or irregularities in
connection with tenders of Old Notes must be cured within such time as the
Issuer shall determine. Neither the Issuer, the Exchange Agent nor any other
person shall be under any duty to give notification of defects or irregularities
with respect to tenders of Old Notes, nor shall any of them incur any liability
for failure to give such notification. Tenders of Old Notes will not be deemed
to have been made until such irregularities have been cured or waived. Any Old
Notes received by the Exchange Agent that are not properly tendered and as to
which the defects or irregularities have not been cured or waived will be
returned without cost to such holder by the Exchange Agent to the tendering
holders of Old Notes, unless otherwise provided in the Letter of Transmittal, as
soon as practicable following the Expiration Date.
In addition, the Issuer reserves the right in its sole discretion, subject
to the provisions of the Indenture, to (i) purchase or make offers for any Old
Notes that remain outstanding subsequent to the Expiration Date or, as set forth
under "-- Conditions," (ii) to terminate the Exchange Offer in accordance with
the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement and (iii) to the extent permitted
by applicable law, purchase Old Notes in the open market, in privately
negotiated transactions or otherwise. The terms of any such purchases or offers
could differ from the terms of the Exchange Offer.
ACCEPTANCE OF OLD NOTES FOR EXCHANGE; DELIVERY OF NEW NOTES
Upon satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions to the Exchange Offer,
all Old Notes properly tendered will be accepted, promptly after the Expiration
Date, and the New Notes will be issued promptly after acceptance of the old
Notes. See "-- Conditions" below. For purposes of the Exchange Offer, Old Notes
shall be deemed to have been accepted as validly tendered for exchange when, as
and if the Issuer has given oral or written notice thereof to the Exchange
Agent.
In all cases, issuance of New Notes for Old Notes that are accepted for
exchange pursuant to the Exchange Offer will be made only after timely receipt
by the Exchange Agent of certificates for such Old Notes or a timely Book-Entry
Confirmation of such Old Notes into the Exchange Agent's account at the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility, a properly completed and duly executed Letter of
Transmittal and all other required documents. If any tendered Old Notes are not
accepted for any reason set forth in the terms and conditions of the Exchange
Offer or if Old Notes are submitted for a greater principal amount than the
holder
28
<PAGE> 30
desires to exchange, such unaccepted or nonexchanged Old Notes will be returned
without expense to the tendering holder thereof (or, in the case of Old Notes
tendered by book-entry transfer procedures described below, such nonexchanged
Old Notes will be credited to an account maintained with such Book-Entry
Transfer Facility) as promptly as practicable after the expiration or
termination of the Exchange Offer.
BOOK-ENTRY TRANSFER
The Exchange Agent will make a request to establish an account with respect
to the Old Notes at the Book-Entry Transfer Facility for purposes of the
Exchange Offer within two business days after the date of this Prospectus. Any
financial institution that is a participant in the Book-Entry Transfer
Facility's systems may make book-entry delivery of Old Notes by causing the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility to transfer such Old Notes into the Exchange
Agent's account at the Book-Entry Transfer Facility in accordance with such
Book-Entry Transfer Facility's procedures for transfer. However, although
delivery of Old Notes may be effected through book-entry transfer at the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility, the Letter of Transmittal with any required
signature guarantees and any other required documents must, in any case, be
transmitted to and received by the Exchange Agent at one of the addresses set
forth below under "-- Exchange Agent" on or prior to the Expiration Date or the
guaranteed delivery procedures described below must be complied with.
GUARANTEED DELIVERY PROCEDURES
If a registered holder of the Old Notes desires to tender such Old Notes,
and the Old Notes are not immediately available, or time will not permit such
holder's Old Notes or other required documents to reach the Exchange Agent
before the Expiration Date, or the procedures for book-entry transfer cannot be
completed on a timely basis, a tender may be effected if (i) the tender is made
through an Eligible Institution, (ii) prior to the Expiration Date, the Exchange
Agent receives from such Eligible Institution a properly completed and duly
executed Letter of Transmittal and Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, substantially
in the form provided by the Issuer (by mail or hand delivery), setting forth the
name and address of the holder of Old Notes and the amount of Old Notes
tendered, stating that the tender is being made thereby and guaranteeing that
within three New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") trading days after the date of
execution of the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, the certificates for all
physically tendered Old Notes, in proper form for transfer, or a Book-Entry
Confirmation, as the case may be, and any other documents required by the Letter
of Transmittal will be deposited by the Eligible Institution with the Exchange
Agent and (iii) the certificates for all physically tendered Old Notes, in
proper form for transfer, or a Book Entry Confirmation, as the case may be, and
all other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal are received by the
Exchange Agent within three NYSE trading days after the date of execution of the
Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
WITHDRAWAL OF TENDERS
Tenders of Old Notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New
York City time on the Expiration Date.
For a withdrawal to be effective, a written notice of withdrawal must be
received by the Exchange Agent prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time on the
Expiration Date at one of the addresses set forth below under "-- Exchange
Agent." Any such notice of withdrawal must specify the name of the person having
tendered the Old Notes to be withdrawn, identify the Old Notes to be withdrawn
(including the principal amount of such Old Notes) and (where certificates for
Old Notes have been transmitted) specify the name in which such Old Notes are
registered, if different from that of the withdrawing holder. If certificates
for Old Notes have been delivered or otherwise identified to the Exchange Agent,
then, prior to the release of such certificates, the withdrawing holder must
also submit the serial numbers of the particular certificates to be withdrawn
and a signed notice of withdrawal with signatures guaranteed by an Eligible
Institution unless such holder is an Eligible Institution. If Old Notes have
been tendered pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer described above,
any notice of withdrawal must specify the name and number of the account at the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility to be credited with the withdrawn Old Notes and
otherwise comply with the procedures of such facility. All questions as to the
validity, form and eligibility (including time of receipt) of such notices will
be determined by the Issuer, whose determination shall be final and binding on
all parties.
29
<PAGE> 31
Any Old Notes so withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for
exchange for purposes of the Exchange Offer. Any Old Notes which have been
tendered for exchange but which are not exchanged for any reason will be
returned to the holder thereof without cost to such holder (or, in the case of
Old Notes tendered by book-entry transfer into the Exchange Agent's account at
the Book-Entry Transfer Facility pursuant to the book-entry transfer procedures
described above, such Old Notes will be credited to an account maintained with
such Book-Entry Transfer Facility for the Old Notes) as soon as practicable
after withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the Exchange Offer.
Properly withdrawn Old Notes may be retendered by following one of the
procedures described under "-- Procedures for Tendering" and "-- Book-Entry
Transfer" above at any time on or prior to the Expiration Date.
CONDITIONS
Notwithstanding any other term of the Exchange Offer, Old Notes will not be
required to be accepted for exchange, nor will New Notes be issued in exchange
for any Old Notes, and the Issuer may terminate or amend the Exchange Offer as
provided herein before the acceptance of such Old Notes, if because of any
change in law, or applicable interpretations thereof by the Commission, the
Issuer determines that they are not permitted to effect the Exchange Offer. The
Issuer has no obligation to, and will not knowingly, permit acceptance of
tenders of Old Notes from affiliates (within the meaning of Rule 405 under the
Securities Act) of the Issuer or from any other holder or holders who are not
eligible to participate in the Exchange Offer under applicable law or
interpretations thereof by the Commission, or if the New Notes to be received by
such holder or holders of Old Notes in the Exchange Offer, upon receipt, will
not be tradable by such holder without restriction under the Securities Act and
the Exchange Act and without material restrictions under the "blue sky" or
securities laws of substantially all of the states of the United States.
EXCHANGE AGENT
State Street Bank and Trust Company has been appointed as Exchange Agent
for the Exchange Offer. Questions and requests for assistance and requests for
additional copies of this Prospectus or of the Letter of Transmittal should be
directed to the Exchange Agent addressed as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
By Mail: By Overnight Mail or Courier:
P.O. Box 778 Two International Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02102 Boston, Massachusetts 02102
Attention: Corporate Trust Department Attention: Corporate Trust Department
By Hand in New York to 5:00 p.m. By Hand in Boston to 5:00 p.m.:
(as drop agent): Two International Place
61 Broadway Fourth Floor
15th Floor Corporation Trust
Corporate Trust Window Boston, Massachusetts 02110
New York, New York 10006
</TABLE>
For information call:
(617) 664-5587
FEES AND EXPENSES
The expenses of soliciting tenders pursuant to the Exchange Offer will be
borne by the Issuer. The principal solicitation for tenders pursuant to the
Exchange Offer is being made by mail; however, additional solicitations may be
made by telegraph, telephone, telecopy or in person by officers and regular
employees of the Issuer.
The Issuer will not make any payments to brokers, dealers or other persons
soliciting acceptances of the Exchange Offer. The Issuer, however, will pay the
Exchange Agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will reimburse
the Exchange Agent for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection
therewith. The Issuer may also pay brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries the
30
<PAGE> 32
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in forwarding copies of the
Prospectus and related documents to the beneficial owners of the Old Notes, and
in handling or forwarding tenders for exchange.
The expenses to be incurred in connection with the Exchange Offer will be
paid by the Issuer, including fees and expenses of the Exchange Agent and
Trustee and accounting, legal, printing and related fees and expenses.
The Issuer will pay all transfer taxes, if any, applicable to the exchange
of Old Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer. If, however, certificates
representing New Notes or Old Notes for principal amounts not tendered or
accepted for exchange are to be delivered to, or are to be registered or issued
in the name of, any person other than the registered holder of the Old Notes
tendered, or if tendered Old Notes are registered in the name of, any person
other than the person signing the Letter of Transmittal, or if a transfer tax is
imposed for any reason other than the exchange of Old Notes pursuant to the
Exchange Offer, then the amount of any such transfer taxes (whether imposed on
the registered holder or any other persons) will be payable by the tendering
holder. If satisfactory evidence of payment of such taxes or exemption therefrom
is not submitted with the Letter of Transmittal, the amount of such transfer
taxes will be billed directly to such tendering holder.
THE RECAPITALIZATION
Zilog was established in 1974 and became a wholly owned subsidiary of Exxon
Corporation in 1981. In 1989, Zilog was acquired in a leveraged buyout
transaction sponsored by Warburg Pincus Capital Company, L.P. In 1991, Zilog
became a publicly traded company, and its Common Stock was initially listed on
Nasdaq and traded under the symbol "ZLOG". Zilog's Common Stock was subsequently
listed on the New York Stock Exchange and traded under the symbol "ZLG" until
February 27, 1998.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Zilog on
February 27, 1998, and Zilog continues as the surviving corporation (the
"Merger"). By virtue of the Merger, shares of Zilog common stock having an
implied value of approximately $7.5 million held by certain of Zilog's
stockholders prior to the Merger were converted into common stock of Zilog. All
other shares of outstanding common stock were canceled and, except for shares of
common stock held in Zilog's treasury, owned by Zilog or any subsidiary of
Zilog, or held by a stockholder of Zilog who has properly exercised appraisal
rights under Delaware law, were converted into the right to receive cash
consideration, all as set forth in the Merger Agreement. By virtue of the
Merger, the common stock of Merger Sub was converted into new shares of Common
Stock, Non-Voting Common Stock and Preferred Stock of Zilog. Also, in connection
with the Merger, options to purchase shares of Common Stock issued under Zilog's
stock plans outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger were
canceled and, in certain instances, were converted into the right to receive an
amount in cash, as set forth in the Merger Agreement. Zilog has paid
approximately $4.2 million to redeem outstanding options as a result of the
Merger. The Merger was approved by Zilog's stockholders on January 27, 1998.
Effective immediately after the consummation of the Merger on February 27,
1998, the Board of Directors of Zilog, the surviving corporation, declared a
4-for-1 stock split in the form of a dividend for each share of Common Stock and
Class A Non-Voting Common Stock and designated 1,500,000 shares of Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock. Unless otherwise specified, all share amounts in
this Prospectus do not give effect to this stock split.
Cash funding requirements for the Merger were satisfied through the
following: (i) the Equity Investment; (ii) use of approximately $34.0 million of
Zilog's cash and cash equivalents; and (iii) $280.0 million of gross proceeds
from the Offering. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources." Upon
the consummation of the Merger, subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions, Zilog may be able to borrow up to $25.0 million under the Revolving
Credit Facility.
31
<PAGE> 33
The Merger was accounted for as a recapitalization transaction for
accounting purposes. The following table sets forth the sources and uses of
funds in connection with the Recapitalization.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT
--------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
SOURCES:
Notes..................................................... $280,000
Equity Investment......................................... 117,500
Continuing Equity Investment.............................. 7,500
--------
Total............................................. $405,000
Excess Cash............................................... 33,998
--------
Total............................................. $438,998
========
USES:
Continuing Equity Investment.............................. $ 7,500
Payment for Outstanding Shares............................ 399,475
Payment for Outstanding Stock Options..................... 4,195
Fees and Expenses......................................... 27,828(1)
--------
Total............................................. $438,998
========
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) As of April 5, 1998 includes approximately $9.3 million of debt issuance
costs which were capitalized and will be amortized over the terms of the
related debt, approximately $15.2 million of fees related to the purchase
and retirement of Zilog's outstanding Common Stock and approximately $3.4
million of bridge loan fees. These fees and expenses do not include other
costs associated with the Recapitalization that are being charged to
operations when incurred.
NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Curtis J. Crawford became President, CEO and a Director of Zilog upon
completion of the Recapitalization. Mr. Crawford, 50, has more than 24 years of
experience in software, systems and semiconductors. He recently served as Group
President of the Microelectronics Group and President of the Intellectual
Property Division of Lucent, a leading designer and manufacturer of a wide range
of communications technologies.
As President of Lucent's Microelectronics Group, Mr. Crawford managed the
worldwide development, design, manufacture and sale of semiconductors and
optoelectronic components for applications in telecommunications, networked
computing, multimedia, wireless and consumer electronics. During Mr. Crawford's
tenure, the Microelectronics Group grew external sales from $0.8 billion in 1991
to $2.8 billion in 1997, representing a 23% compound annual growth rate. As
President of Lucent's Intellectual Property Division, Mr. Crawford managed a
broad portfolio of technology patents and licenses.
TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
TPG was founded by David Bonderman, James G. Coulter and William S. Price,
III in 1992 to pursue public and private investment opportunities through a
variety of methods, including leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations, joint
ventures, restructurings and strategic public securities investments. The
principals of TPG operate TPG Partners, L.P. and TPG Partners II, both Delaware
limited partnerships with aggregate committed capital of over $3.2 billion.
Among TPG's investments are technology and telecommunications companies Paradyne
Corporation, GlobeSpan Semiconductor and GT Com. Other TPG portfolio companies
include America West Airlines, Belden & Blake, Beringer Wine Estates, Del Monte
Foods, Denbury Resources, Ducati Motor, Favorite Brands International, Genesis
ElderCare, J. Crew, Virgin Entertainment and Vivra Specialty Partners. In
addition, the principals of TPG led the $9 billion reorganization of Continental
Airlines in 1993. The principal executive office of TPG is located at 201 Main
Street, Suite 2420, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 and its telephone number is (817)
871-4000.
USE OF PROCEEDS
There will be no cash proceeds payable to Zilog from the issuance of the
New Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer. The proceeds from the sale of the Old
Notes were used by Zilog to finance the Recapitalization.
32
<PAGE> 34
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the cash and consolidated capitalization of
Zilog as of April 5, 1998. The following table should be read in conjunction
with the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information, the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
APRIL 5, 1998
--------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 66,890
========
Long-term debt:
The Notes................................................. $280,000
--------
Total debt(1)..................................... 280,000
Stockholders' equity:
Stock and paid-in capital................................. 25,200
Retained earnings (deficit)............................... (1,996)
--------
Total stockholders' equity........................ 23,204
--------
Total capitalization.............................. $303,204
========
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) In addition, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent,
Zilog is able to borrow up to $25.0 million under the Revolving Credit
Facility.
33
<PAGE> 35
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 1997 and the three months in the period ended April
5, 1998 give effect to the Recapitalization as though it had occurred on January
1, 1997. The pro forma adjustments as applied to the respective historical
consolidated financial information of the Issuer reflect and account for the
Merger as a recapitalization. Accordingly, the historical basis of the Issuer's
assets and liabilities has not been impacted by the Merger. The pro forma
adjustments presented are based upon available information and certain
assumptions that Zilog's management believes are reasonable.
The following should be read in conjunction with Zilog's Consolidated
Financial Statements and notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this
Prospectus. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information and
related notes are provided for informational purposes only and are not
necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the
Recapitalization been completed on the date indicated nor is such financial
information necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected to occur
in the future.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 5, 1998
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA
---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales....................... $261,097 $261,097 $ 49,539 $ 49,539
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales............. 171,722 171,722 40,767 40,767
Research and
development............ 30,467 30,467 8,104 8,104
Selling, general and
administrative......... 47,806 47,806 13,941 13,941
Recapitalization.......... 13,304 $ (13,304)(1) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
Total costs and
expenses............. 249,995 249,995 76,116 (13,304) 62,812
-------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
Operating income (loss)..... 11,102 11,102 (26,577) 13,304 (13,273)
Other income (expense):
Interest income........... 2,892 $ (1,296)(2) 1,596 1,159 (60)(2) 1,099
Interest expense.......... -- (28,429)(3) (28,429) (2,978) (4,361)(3) (7,339)
Other..................... 832 -- 832 (88) -- (88)
-------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
Income (loss) before income
taxes..................... 14,826 (29,725) (14,899) (28,484) 8,883 (19,601)
Provision (benefit) for
income taxes.............. 2,965 (10,404)(4) (7,439) (8,545) 3,109(4) (5,436)
-------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
Net income (loss)........... $ 11,861 $(19,321) $ (7,460) $(19,939) $ 5,774 $(14,165)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========== ========
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Represents the elimination of non-recurring Merger related expenses in
executive and employee bonuses, severance payments and consulting fees and
payments in respect of employee stock options outstanding prior to the
Merger. In addition, approximately $10 million in executive and employee
bonuses will be recorded during the second and third quarters of fiscal
1998.
(2) Represents reduction of interest income due to the reduction of cash and
cash equivalents as a result of the Merger.
(3) Represents interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs as a
result of the Merger.
(4) Provision (Benefit) provided at United States statutory rate.
34
<PAGE> 36
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes certain selected consolidated financial data
of the Issuer and its subsidiaries. The selected consolidated financial data as
of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1997 have been derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with, consolidated financial statements that have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, appearing elsewhere herein. The
selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 and
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1994 have been
derived from consolidated financial statements that have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent auditors, which are not included or incorporated herein.
The selected consolidated financial data for the three months in the periods
ended March 30, 1997 and April 5, 1998 and as of April 5, 1998 have been derived
from, and should be read in conjunction with, the unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere herein and include, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of the results for the unaudited interim periods.
Results for the three months in the period ended April 5, 1998 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year,
and includes charges related to the Recapitalization. The information presented
below should be read in conjunction with "Capitalization," "Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Information," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere
in this Prospectus. See also "Available Information" and "Disclosure Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------
---------------------------------------------------- MARCH 30, APRIL 5,
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Sales.......................................... $202,727 $223,316 $265,122 $298,425 $261,097 $70,136 $ 49,539
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales................................ 105,727 111,288 135,066 175,319 171,722 44,028 40,767
Research and development..................... 20,833 23,048 24,546 30,548 30,467 6,632 8,104
Selling, general and administrative.......... 37,619 37,790 41,943 47,934 47,806 12,052 13,941
Recapitalization............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,304
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total costs and expenses....................... 164,179 172,126 201,555 253,801 249,995 62,712 76,116
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Operating income (loss)........................ 38,548 51,190 63,567 44,624 11,102 7,424 (26,577)
Other income (expense):
Interest income.............................. 2,463 2,496 2,676 2,443 2,892 595 1,159
Interest expense............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (2,978)
Other........................................ 813 860 (360) (911) 832 (880) (88)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes.............. 41,824 54,546 65,883 46,156 14,826 7,139 (28,484)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes........... 15,057 19,637 23,418 16,155 2,965 2,356 (8,545)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Net (loss) income.............................. $ 26,767 $ 34,909 $ 42,465 $ 30,001 $ 11,861 $ 4,783 $(19,939)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======= ========
OTHER DATA:
EBITDA(1)...................................... $ 55,489 $ 72,908 $ 90,421 $ 92,028 $ 75,684 $21,694 $(10,790)
Depreciation................................... 16,128 20,858 27,214 48,315 63,750 15,150 16,015
Capital expenditures........................... 39,658 60,708 79,346 117,065 38,437 11,991 7,260
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2).......... 53.9x 79.7x 81.3x 56.4x 18.2x 34.1x N/M
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF
PERIOD):
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments.................................. $ 75,240 $ 87,900 $ 81,608 $ 68,923 $106,311 $ 66,890
Working capital................................ 88,131 85,173 102,761 88,567 131,594 93,791
Net property, plant and equipment.............. 78,789 126,651 179,340 248,711 223,577 214,962
Total assets................................... 212,470 286,691 353,430 401,066 415,639 373,105
Total debt..................................... -- -- -- -- -- 280,000
Stockholders' equity........................... 165,580 212,595 278,864 325,280 340,482 23,204
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) EBITDA represents earnings (losses) from operations before interest income
and expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs), income
taxes, depreciation, amortization of goodwill and non-cash stock option
compensa-
35
<PAGE> 37
tion expenses. EBITDA is presented because it is a widely accepted financial
indicator of a leveraged company's ability to service and/or incur
indebtedness and because management believes that EBITDA is a relevant
measure of the Issuer's ability to generate cash without regard to the
Issuer's capital structure or working capital needs. EBITDA as presented may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies,
depending upon the non-cash charges included. When evaluating EBITDA,
investors should consider that EBITDA (i) should not be considered in
isolation but together with other factors which may influence operating and
investing activities, such as changes in operating assets and liabilities
and purchases of property and equipment; (ii) is not a measure of
performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; (iii) should not be construed as an alternative or substitute
for income from operations, net income or cash flows from operating
activities in analyzing the Issuer's operating performance, financial
position or cash flows; and (iv) should not be used as an indicator of the
Issuer's operating performance or as a measure of its liquidity.
(2) For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, (i)
earnings consist of income before income taxes, plus fixed charges and (ii)
fixed charges consist of interest expense incurred and the estimated portion
of rental expense deemed by the Company to be representative of the interest
factor of rental payments under operating leases. For the three months ended
April 5, 1998, the deficiency of earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes to cover fixed charges was $28.5 million.
36
<PAGE> 38
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is management's discussion and analysis of the financial
condition and results of operations of Zilog for the fiscal years ended December
31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and the three months in the periods ended March 30, 1997
and April 5, 1998. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the sections entitled "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data," "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Information" and the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere
herein. Management's discussion and analysis provides information concerning
Zilog's business environment, consolidated results of operations and liquidity
and capital resources. In addition to historical information, management's
discussion and analysis includes certain forward-looking statements regarding
events and financial trends that may affect Zilog's future operating results and
financial position. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. Such
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause Zilog's
actual results and financial position to differ materially. Such risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those specifically discussed
below as well as those set forth in "Risk Factors" and "Disclosure Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements."
GENERAL
Zilog is a worldwide designer, manufacturer and marketer of ASSPs for use
in the consumer electronics, data communications, and computer peripherals end
markets. ASSPs are logic devices designed for a particular application but are
not proprietary to a specific customer. Zilog's products, many of which are
"designed in" to customers' end-products, demonstrate generally greater customer
acceptance, longer life cycles and less obsolescence than general purpose
microprocessors.
Zilog, a pioneer in the semiconductor market, is headquartered in Campbell,
California, and operates two fabrication facilities in Nampa, Idaho and two test
and assembly centers in the Philippines. For the fiscal year ended December 31,
1997, Zilog generated revenue and EBITDA of $261.1 million and $75.7 million,
respectively. For the three months in the period ended April 5, 1998, Zilog's
revenue and pro forma EBITDA were $49.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Financial Performance. During the second half of 1997 and the first half of
1998, Zilog experienced a general decline in revenue consistent with the overall
decline in the current semiconductor marketplace. Similar to other semiconductor
companies, the Company is considering implementation of certain cost-cutting
measures which may include, but are not limited to, the following: refocusing of
business priorities; renegotiation with vendors and service providers to lower
the costs of materials and services; reallocation of personnel and
responsibilities to better utilize human resources; partnering to better utilize
assets; reductions in workforce; changes of manufacturing mix; increased use of
subcontractors or foundry for greater efficiency and lower short term costs;
changes in shift structures; and temporary plant shutdowns. In addition, Zilog
is considering realignment of capital expenditures consistent with its current
level of business.
Asian Revenue. In 1997, Zilog generated approximately $110.5 million, or
42.3% of its total revenue, from sales to customers located in Korea, Singapore,
Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan and China. While economic activity in some of these
countries, most notably Korea, has been adversely affected by recent
developments in local currency and banking markets, Zilog believes that the
effect of these developments on Zilog's business is somewhat mitigated by the
financial condition of many of Zilog's customers in these markets, such as
Samsung, Hitachi, Logitech and NMB. Many of these customers are leaders in their
respective industries and conduct their business on a multinational basis. In
addition, a substantial portion of Zilog's total revenue generated from the
Asian region in 1997 was related to end-products subsequently exported to
non-Asian markets such as the United States and Europe and therefore represent
an important source of foreign currency for these customers. Zilog does not
believe that economic conditions in Asia had a material effect on 1997 revenue.
Zilog believes that it will continue to benefit from the geographic diversity of
its customers and the
37
<PAGE> 39
diverse end-markets for its customers' products. No assurance can be given that
continued negative developments in the Asian region will not have an adverse
effect on Zilog's future operating performance. See "Risk Factors -- Export
Sales; International Operations."
Standard & Poor's. On April 18, 1998, Standard & Poor's revised its outlook
on Zilog to negative from positive, while affirming Zilog's credit rating, and
the ratings on the Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility.
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 COMPARED TO QUARTER ENDED APRIL 5, 1998
Sales in the first quarter of 1998 were $49.5 million, compared to $70.1
million in the first quarter of 1997, a decrease of $20.6 million, or 29.4%. The
decline in sales was primarily attributable to a decline of $13.1 million in the
data communications group as a result of lower volume and prices, particularly
in the modem product line. The modem volume decline was affected by the loss of
a significant design position with a data communications equipment manufacturer.
The customer placed no orders in the first quarter of 1998 and Zilog does not
anticipate receiving future orders. Revenue declined approximately $3.7 million
in the peripherals group, primarily as a result of the discontinuation of the
development and marketing of the hard disk products. This reflected Zilog's
strategic decision to refocus its development efforts on other market
opportunities. In addition, sales of keyboard products declined as a result of
the industry slowdown in personal computer sales. Revenue also declined further
due to approximately $3.8 million in price declines in the television and
infrared remote product lines of the consumer group.
Overall unit volumes declined by 13.0% in the first quarter of 1998
compared to the same period in 1997 largely due to lower shipments in the modem
and keyboard product lines as described above. Average selling prices also
declined as a result of changes in the sales mix and factors described above,
together with the continuing over-capacity in the industry.
Domestic and international sales in the first quarter of 1998 were 36.8%
and 63.2% of revenue, respectively, compared to 38.0% and 62.0%, respectively,
in the first quarter of 1997.
Cost of Sales in the first quarter of 1998 was $40.8 million, or 82.3% of
sales, compared to $44.0 million, or 62.8% of sales in the first quarter of
1997, a decrease of $3.3 million, or 7.4%. This increase in cost of sales as a
percentage of sales was primarily attributable to a decrease in revenue as a
result of lower average selling prices. The decrease in cost of sales in
absolute dollars in the first quarter of 1998, when compared to the same period
of 1997, is a result of producing less units.
Research and Development expenses in the first quarter of 1998 were $8.1
million, compared to $6.6 million in the first quarter of 1997, an increase of
$1.5 million, or 22.2%. This increase primarily reflects continued investments
in outside design services to assist in the development of new products and
added depreciation due to the capital investments in Zilog's new research and
development technology center in Idaho. Zilog plans to invest a major portion of
its estimated $37 million capital expenditures budget for 1998 in completing its
research and development technology center, which will have the capability of
designing to a 0.35 micron feature size in mixed signal processes.
Selling, General and Administrative expenses in the first quarter of 1998
were $13.9 million compared to $12.1 million in the first quarter of 1997, an
increase of $1.8 million, or 15.7%. This increase was due to higher personnel
costs associated with increasing the sales force and a worldwide sales meeting.
Operating Income (loss) in the first quarter of 1998 was ($26.6) million
compared to $7.4 million of income in the first quarter of 1997. The reduction
in operating income in the first quarter of 1998 was primarily due to
recapitalization expenses associated with the Merger and lower revenue as a
result of lower average selling prices and product mix.
Benefit for Taxes. The benefit for income taxes was 30.0% for the first
quarter of 1998, compared to 33.0% in the first quarter of 1997. The 1998
benefit differs from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of foreign
taxes, and the expiration of the Philippines tax holiday. The tax provision for
the first quarter of 1997 differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as
a result of tax exempt earnings and foreign earnings taxed at a lower than U.S.
tax rate offset by state taxes.
38
<PAGE> 40
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Sales for 1997 were $261.1 million, compared to $298.4 million in 1996, a
decrease of $37.3 million, or 12.5%. The sales decline was primarily
attributable to (i) the loss of a significant design position with a data
communications equipment manufacturer and (ii) the decrease of microprocessor
sales to hard disk manufacturers. The data communications customer, which
generated approximately 12.8% of 1996 revenues, changed the technology of its
newest model(s) of its modem product, which resulted in a decrease to Zilog of
approximately $23 million in revenue versus the year-earlier period, although
this particular customer continues to purchase Zilog's products for other
applications. No single customer accounted for more than 8% of revenue in 1997.
The discontinuation of the development and marketing of the hard disk products,
which resulted in a decrease to Zilog of approximately $8.5 million in revenue
versus the year-earlier period, reflected Zilog's strategic decision to refocus
its development efforts on other market opportunities.
Overall unit volume increased by 15.4% in 1997, largely driven by increased
demand for Zilog's keyboard and pointing device ASSPs. Revenue growth, however,
was adversely affected by generally declining average selling prices as a result
of changes in sales mix described above and continuing over-capacity in the
industry.
Cost of Sales in 1997 was $171.7 million or 65.8% of sales, compared to
$175.3 million or 58.7% of sales in 1996, a decrease of $3.6 million or 2.1%.
The decrease in cost of sales was primarily attributable to the elimination in
1997 of outside wafer foundry cost offset by increased depreciation of $15.8
million and overhead associated with the new MOD III manufacturing facility in
Nampa, Idaho, which was completed in 1996. Excluding this increase in
depreciation expense associated with the new facility, 1997 cost of sales as a
percent of revenues was relatively unchanged at 59.7% compared to 58.7% in 1996.
Research and Development expenses for 1997 and 1996 were both $30.5
million. Research and Development expenses could increase in 1998 due to higher
depreciation charges associated with Zilog's investments in its new Research and
Development Technology Center, which is located in the new MOD III manufacturing
facility.
Selling, General and Administrative expenses for 1997 were $47.8 million,
which is relatively unchanged from the $47.9 million recorded in 1996.
Administrative expenses were $1.5 million less in 1997 than in 1996 due to a
litigation settlement in 1996, partially offset by higher recruiting and
personnel costs in 1997 associated with increasing the sales force.
Operating Income for 1997 was $11.1 million, or 4.3% of sales, compared to
$44.6 million, or 15.0% of sales, for 1996. The reduction in operating income in
1997 was primarily due to a higher percentage of cost of goods sold as a result
of lower revenues and increased depreciation charges associated with Zilog's new
MOD III manufacturing facility.
Provision for Taxes. Zilog's effective tax rate was 20% for 1997 compared
to 35% for 1996. The lower provision for income taxes for 1997 is primarily
attributable to a larger impact of tax exempt interest income, foreign earnings
taxed at a lower rate than the United States rate and the reinstatement of the
research and development tax credit on reduced pre-tax earnings. During 1997,
the President signed new legislation into law retroactively reinstating the
research and development tax credit for 1997. In addition, through December 27,
1997, Zilog was entitled to a partial tax holiday in the Philippines. As of
1998, Zilog's Philippines earnings will effectively be taxed at higher rates.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Sales for 1996 were $298.4 million, compared to $265.1 million in 1995, an
increase of $33.3 million, or 12.6%. The growth in 1996 was driven by increased
unit volumes of data communications and consumer electronics products with no
single customer accounting for more than 12.8% of sales. See "Risk Factors --
Key Customers."
Cost of Sales in 1996 was $175.3 million, compared to $135.1 million for
1995, an increase of 29.8%. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales increased to
58.7% in 1996 from 50.9% in 1995, primarily as a result of
39
<PAGE> 41
additional depreciation expenses and production overhead costs related to
Zilog's new MOD III manufacturing facility.
Research and Development expenses for 1996 were $30.5 million, compared to
$24.5 million for 1995, an increase of 24.5%. The increase primarily reflects
continued investment in new product development.
Selling, General and Administrative expenses for 1996 were $47.9 million,
compared to $41.9 million for 1995, an increase of 14.3%. As a percentage of
sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 16.1% in 1996
from 15.8% in 1995. This increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of
sales is primarily attributable to costs associated with a litigation
settlement. See "Risk Factors -- Environmental Regulation."
Operating Income for 1996 was $44.6 million, or 15.0% of sales, compared to
$63.6 million, or 24.0% of sales, for 1995. The decrease in operating income in
1996 was primarily due to a higher percentage of costs of goods sold as a result
of increased depreciation charges and production overhead associated with
Zilog's new MOD III manufacturing facility.
Provision for Taxes. Zilog's effective tax rate was 35% for 1996 compared
to 35.5% for 1995. The 1996 effective tax rate differs from the 1995 effective
tax rate primarily because of Zilog's increased investment in tax exempt
securities and state income tax credits.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
On February 27, 1998, Zilog issued $280 million principal amount of the Old
Notes. Proceeds, net of debt issuance costs, were approximately $270.7 million
and were used to finance the Merger.
In conjunction with the Merger, the Issuer entered into the Revolving
Credit Facility. To date, no amount has been borrowed under the Revolving Credit
Facility.
During the first quarter of fiscal 1998, Zilog incurred operating and net
losses due in large part to the $13.3 million recapitalization charges,
depreciation expense and amortization and interest expenses related to the
Notes.
Cash used by operating activities was $5.9 million for the three months
ended April 5, 1998, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of
$11.2 million for the three months ended March 30, 1997. Because of the sale of
short term investments, cash provided from investing activities was $6.9 million
for the three months ended April 5, 1998, as compared to cash used by investing
activities of $15.6 million for the three months ended March 30, 1997. Cash used
by financing activities for the three months ended April 5, 1998 was $26.2
million and was primarily attributable to cash transactions related to the
Merger, compared to $0.4 million in cash provided by financing activities for
the three months ended March 30, 1997.
Zilog expects to make total capital expenditures of approximately $37.0
million in 1998. These expenditures will primarily be used to complete Zilog's
investment in its new research and development technology facility in Idaho, to
purchase production equipment for its fabrication facility, and for computer
networks and office productivity tools.
Subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions precedent, Zilog may
borrow on the Revolving Credit Facility, if needed. At present, the Company
would not be able to satisfy such conditions; however, Zilog believes its
current cash and cash equivalents, together with funds expected to be generated
from operations, will provide adequate cash to fund the Issuer's anticipated
liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months.
Zilog's primary cash needs are working capital and capital expenditures.
Zilog has financed these cash requirements primarily through internally
generated cash flow and cash received upon the exercise of stock options. As of
April 5, 1998, Zilog had cash and short term investments of approximately $66.9
million.
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 1997 was $72.6 million
compared to $91.6 million for fiscal 1996. The major component for both periods
was depreciation and amortization of $63.8 million and $48.3 million for 1997
and 1996, respectively, as well as a reduction in outstanding accounts
receivable and higher net income in 1996.
40
<PAGE> 42
Zilog generated cash from investing activities of $1.1 million in 1997
compared to using cash of $96.9 million in 1996 and $71.4 million in 1995,
primarily as a result of capital expenditures of $117.1 million and $79.3
million in 1996 and 1995, respectively. Zilog has made approximately $38.4
million of capital expenditures through the end of fiscal 1997, principally for
equipment in the new research and development technology center for development
of 0.35 micron and mixed signal process.
Cash provided by financing activities was $3.0 million and $13.0 million
for 1997 and 1996, respectively, representing the proceeds from the exercise of
stock options and purchases under Zilog's Stock Purchase Plan.
Zilog expects its capital expenditures for 1998 to be approximately $37.3
million, principally for equipment for the MOD III fabrication facility and the
technology center, computer networks and office productivity tools (E-mail,
voicemail and personal computers). Zilog estimates that in 1998 following the
Recapitalization it will spend approximately $20 million on non-recurring
expenses relating to the Recapitalization including executive and employee
bonuses and severance payments, payments in respect of outstanding employee
stock options and consulting fees. Zilog also intends to move to a larger
headquarters building and to increase the number of its design engineers, sales
personnel, field application engineers and distribution partners. See
"Business -- Business Strategy." While Zilog is unable to estimate the annual
cost of this increase, Zilog anticipates that it may be significant. Zilog
expects to fund these capital expenditures and other costs from cash on hand and
internally generated cash flows. As of April 5, 1998, after giving effect to the
Recapitalization, Zilog had $66.9 million of cash and short-term investments on
hand. See "Risk Factors -- Recent and Anticipated Operating Results."
As a result of the Recapitalization, Zilog's capital structure changed
substantially. At the closing of the Recapitalization, Zilog's capital structure
consisted of the Old Notes, a $25.0 million Revolving Credit Facility (as to
which no amount was drawn at closing) and stockholders' equity of $34.1 million.
Upon consummation of the Merger, the Revolving Credit Facility became available
to fund Zilog's working capital needs. The Revolving Credit Facility will mature
in 2003 and has no scheduled interim amortization.
Zilog's ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, or to pay
the interest or premium, if any, on, or to refinance, its indebtedness
(including the Notes), or to fund planned capital and other expenditures will
depend on its future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other
factors that are beyond its control. Based upon the current level of operations,
management believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together
with available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, will be adequate
to meet Zilog's anticipated future requirements for working capital, budgeted
capital and other expenditures and scheduled payments of principal and interest
on its indebtedness, including the New Notes, for the next several years. There
can be no assurance that Zilog's business will generate sufficient cash flow
from operations or that future borrowings will be available under the Revolving
Credit Facility in an amount sufficient to enable Zilog to service its
indebtedness, including the New Notes, or make anticipated capital and other
expenditures.
As part of its business strategy, Zilog plans to replace the majority of
its computer systems. Such systems will function properly with respect to dates
in the year 2000 and thereafter. Zilog is investigating Year 2000 compliance by
its vendors and customers. There can be no assurance that the systems of such
other companies will be converted in a timely manner and will not have an
adverse effect on Zilog.
INFLATION
Zilog does not believe that inflation has had a material impact on its
results of operations.
41
<PAGE> 43
BUSINESS
THE ISSUER
Zilog is a worldwide designer, manufacturer and marketer of ASSPs for use
in the high-growth consumer electronics, data communications and computer
peripherals end markets. Through proprietary design technology, the Issuer works
with customers to customize its ASSPs to control the basic function and
performance of electronic devices. ASSPs typically comprise some combination of
a microprocessor, digital signal processor, memory and input/output functions on
a single semiconductor. Examples of the Issuer's product applications include
chips in televisions that provide picture-in-picture display and in remote
control units that send instructions to televisions and video cassette
recorders, and chips that operate keyboards and mouse-type pointing devices.
Through its worldwide distribution network of more than 120 representatives and
distributors, the Issuer supplies over 800 customers with over 700 products. The
average life cycles of these products are over eight years.
The Issuer places significant emphasis on anticipating and meeting its
customers' needs as new electronic devices are designed. As customers "design
in" Zilog's products, the Issuer is able to gain a greater share of its
customers' purchases while maintaining its embedded position within its
customers' existing products. The Issuer believes that this design strategy is
at the core of its ability to achieve a high degree of customer acceptance
within specific applications. Reflecting the proprietary and often sole-source
nature of its products within its customers' applications, the Issuer's
relationships with its top 10 customers average seven years. In addition,
Zilog's customer base includes many leaders in their respective industries,
including Black & Decker, Cellnet, Cisco, DSC Communications, Fujitsu, General
Instrument, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Logitech, Lucky Goldstar, Microsoft, NMB,
Samsung, Sharp and VeriFone.
Founded in 1974, Zilog is a pioneer in the semiconductor market. The
Issuer's Z-80 product, introduced in 1975, is the largest selling 8-bit
microprocessor in history and is still being sold today. In 1997, Zilog products
based on the Z-80 architecture accounted for approximately $75 million in
revenue, representing 29% of the Issuer's total revenue. Headquartered in
Campbell, California, the Issuer has two fabrication facilities in Nampa, Idaho
and two test and assembly centers in the Philippines. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, the Issuer had revenue of $261.1 million and EBITDA of $75.7
million. For the three month period ended April 5, 1998, the Issuer had revenue
of $49.5 million and pro forma EBITDA of $2.5 million.
THE INDUSTRY
According to trade statistics published by the SIA, revenue for the
worldwide semiconductor market was $137 billion in 1997. The overall
semiconductor market has expanded at a compound annual growth rate of 17% from
1991 to 1997. The semiconductor industry is comprised of three broad product
segments: logic devices, including microprocessors, microcontrollers and digital
signal processors, which process data (approximately 50% of total industry
sales); memory devices, which store data (approximately 22% of total industry
sales); and analog and discrete devices, which process electronic signals
(approximately 28% of total industry sales). Zilog develops, manufactures and
markets products in the logic device segment. The logic device segment further
consists of three distinct categories: (i) general purpose logic products, such
as the Intel Pentium(R) microprocessor, which are neither application nor
customer specific, are used for a wide array of logic-related functions and are
typically capable of more functions than are actually required for any given
application; (ii) ASICs, which are designed to meet particular application
requirements, are usually proprietary to one customer and are generally produced
in relatively small volumes; and (iii) ASSPs, which are designed for a
particular application, but are not proprietary to a single customer. The
Issuer's ASSPs typically comprise some combination of a microprocessor, digital
signal processor, memory and input/output functions on a single semiconductor to
control the basic function and performance of its customers' products.
Revenue for the ASSP segment of the semiconductor industry has grown from
$14.6 billion in 1994 to $27.8 billion in 1997, a compound annual growth rate of
approximately 24%, and is forecasted to grow to $44.6 billion by the year 2000.
The Issuer believes that the market for ASSPs is distinct from other logic and
42
<PAGE> 44
memory markets in that it is less cyclical and that ASSPs typically have longer
product life cycles. Applications in the ASSP market generally do not demand the
processing power of general purpose microprocessors such as the Intel Pentium(R)
microprocessor, which operates personal computers; rather, Zilog's products
operate or perform specialized functions in everyday products such as
telephones, garage door openers and televisions, all of which exhibit growing
degrees of silicon content.
ZILOG'S STRENGTHS
As a pioneer in the industry, Zilog has established a well-recognized and
respected brand name in its markets and has developed strong, long-term
relationships with numerous customers who are leaders in their respective
markets. The Issuer's franchise is built upon several specific strengths,
including the following:
LEADING MARKET POSITION WITH HIGH QUALITY CUSTOMER BASE. The Issuer
believes it maintains a leading market position in several niches, including
television remote controls, keyboards and mouse-type pointing devices.
Approximately 70% of its revenue is derived from proprietary relationships with
customers for a particular product design. The Issuer believes that these
relationships provide a significant recurring revenue stream and represent a
strong competitive advantage for Zilog as a redesign of the customer's hardware
and software to use a competitor's ASSP would often involve substantial costs to
the customer. In addition, Zilog believes that it has established strong,
long-term relationships by partnering with customers throughout the iterative
product design and manufacturing process. Currently, the Issuer sells to more
than 800 customers worldwide, and its relationships with its top 10 customers
average seven years. In consumer electronics, Zilog sells to customers that
include Black & Decker, Samsung, SGS-Thomson, Sony and Zenith. In data
communications, Zilog's customers include Lucent, Cisco, IBM, Motorola and
VeriFone. Zilog's computer peripheral customers include Hewlett-Packard,
Microsoft and NMB, the largest keyboard manufacturer in the world.
DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS AND MARKETS. Within the consumer electronics, data
communications and computer peripherals end markets, Zilog sells and markets
over 700 products to more than 800 customers worldwide. The Issuer sells either
directly through its 29 sales offices or indirectly through its more than 120
sales representatives and distributors located throughout the world. In 1997, no
single product or single customer accounted for more than 8% of total revenue.
The Issuer believes that its product and market diversity, its independence from
reliance on any one customer and its numerous sales personnel and locations
around the world help to insulate the Issuer from some of the volatility that
affects other companies in the semiconductor industry. The Issuer also believes
no competitor addresses exactly the same diverse set of markets.
COMPREHENSIVE PROPRIETARY DESIGN LIBRARY. Based upon over 20 years of
design expertise, Zilog's proprietary design library allows customers to select
or modify proven components that can be combined and assembled to create new
products or new applications. Zilog's customers that have designed their
products using one or more of the Issuer's devices can redesign and upgrade to
new Zilog ASSPs, often without the loss of hardware or software compatibility.
This methodology allows customers to leverage Zilog's vast component library to
advance their own product development processes. Because of extensive
customization, Zilog's customers depend upon Zilog's expertise for much of their
end-product functionality. A Zilog customer switching to a non-Zilog design
could incur significant learning, design, software and manufacturing costs.
OWNERSHIP OF STATE-OF-THE-ART MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Over the last three
years, Zilog has spent $235 million to increase capacity and improve efficiency
by building a new wafer fabrication facility, renovating an existing facility
and equipping both facilities with state-of-the-art equipment. These facilities
contain fabrication modules equipped to manufacture products with competitive
submicron dimensions. Overall, the Issuer estimates that it is operating its
fabrication facilities at 60% capacity, enabling Zilog to capitalize on future
upswings in industry demand. The present building also has sufficient space and
infrastructure to accommodate the additional machinery for a 50% increase in
total capacity. Because of a decrease in business, the Company may engage in
certain cost-cutting measures to enable it to operate more efficiently for the
amount of product now being manufactured.
43
<PAGE> 45
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Under the leadership of Curtis J. Crawford, formerly Group President of the
Microelectronics Group and President of the Intellectual Property Division of
Lucent, who joined Zilog as President and CEO upon the closing of the
Recapitalization, the Issuer intends to capitalize on its core strengths with
the following business strategies:
INCREASE EFFICIENCY OF SALES OPERATIONS. The Issuer intends to consolidate
its sales operations to improve efficiency and focus its direct sales force and
its manufacturers' sales representatives on developing larger volume customers.
Zilog will work with distributors to better manage the large number of small
customers. The Issuer believes that an increased emphasis on design wins by
refocusing its field application engineering and sales resources and
improvements in design tools for use by its customers should lead to an
increased base of recurring revenue from its customers. Zilog increased its
design wins from 180 in 1995 to over 200 each in 1996 and 1997.
FOCUS APPLICATIONS. Utilizing its library of proprietary designs, the
Issuer has introduced an average of 39 new products annually since 1993,
including 36 new products in 1997. The Issuer's strategy is to focus its efforts
on those product lines in which Zilog believes it has the expertise to succeed.
By concentrating its efforts in fewer areas, Zilog intends to upgrade its
existing product lines to meet the changing requirements of evolving
applications. In addition to releasing new or upgraded products in its historic
market applications (e.g., keyboards, mouse-type pointing devices and television
remote controls), Zilog expects to introduce in 1998 products in several areas
that capitalize on its technological expertise, including transaction processing
(credit card) modems, internet-access devices for televisions and telephones and
enhanced USB keyboard and pointing device microcontrollers for personal
computers.
EXPAND PRODUCT CAPABILITIES. The Issuer's position within its markets
depends in part upon the strength and capabilities of its library of proprietary
designs. Zilog intends to expand its existing library by utilizing its
engineering resources more effectively, investing in computer-aided development
tools to assist the Issuer's design engineers and acquiring additional design
technology from third parties. By investing in its design library, Zilog will be
able to offer more products with broader functionalities and enhance its
competitive position with new and existing customers.
STRENGTHEN INTERNAL SYSTEMS AND CUSTOMER SUPPORT TOOLS. The Issuer intends
to increase the efficiency of its experienced employee workforce by investing in
appropriate productivity tools and upgrading office workspace. For example, the
Issuer intends to invest over $8 million in 1998 in improved internal systems
such as E-mail, computer networks and voicemail. In addition, the Issuer
recently moved its headquarters to a nearby facility providing approximately
33,000 additional square feet of office space. Zilog also intends to improve its
offering of customer support tools such as compilers, emulators and debuggers,
which facilitate customer adoption of Zilog products. With these tools, Zilog
believes the value of its existing product portfolio to its customers, as well
as from its ability to create new products, should be significantly enhanced.
LEVERAGE MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES. The Issuer's ownership of a
substantial portion of its manufacturing resources provides an important
strategic advantage. Direct control over fabrication, assembly and test
operations allows Zilog to offer its customers continuous supply, shortens the
Issuer's design and production cycles and allows Zilog to capture the
manufacturing margin. Having spent $235 million over the last three years in
order to increase capacity and improve efficiency in its manufacturing
facilities, Zilog believes it is well positioned to increase revenue and margins
in the future. Because of a decrease in business, the Company may engage in
certain cost-cutting measures consistent with its current level of business.
The Company's strategy involves substantial risk. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be successful in implementing its strategy or that its
strategy, even if implemented, will lead to successful achievement of the
Company's objectives. If the Company is unable to implement its strategy
effectively, the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
MARKETS AND PRODUCTS
Zilog relies upon its knowledge, experience, customer relationships and
proprietary core and cell designs to target products in the rapidly growing
consumer electronics, data communications and computer peripheral
44
<PAGE> 46
end markets. Because Zilog creates ASSPs which have a high degree of integration
and which are designed for a particular application, but which are not
proprietary to a single customer, Zilog's ASSPs typically address larger
aggregate markets and generally have higher production volumes than ASICs. Zilog
works closely with industry leaders in its selected markets to design innovative
products. Through its customer relationships, Zilog has been able to establish
and maintain technological leadership, attract multiple customers in the same
market and create industry standards. The Issuer believes that it is
well-positioned with respect to the trends in its target market areas, which
trends include the increase in the complexity and sophistication of consumer
electronics products and the networking of, and increased demand for, personal
computers and peripherals.
Zilog's ASSP products are primarily based upon 8-bit and 16-bit
microprocessor, microcontroller or digital signal processors. Applications in
the ASSP market generally do not demand the processing power of microprocessors
such as the Intel Pentium(R) microprocessor, which operates personal computers.
Rather, Zilog's products operate or perform specialized functions in everyday
products such as telephones, garage door openers and televisions, all of which
exhibit growing degrees of silicon content.
Zilog currently offers over 700 products (independent of ROM codes), sold
in a wide selection of package, speed grade and other configurations to more
than 800 customers worldwide. Zilog's customers include Black & Decker, Cisco,
Cellnet, DSC Communication, Fujitsu, General Instrument, Hewlett-Packard,
Hitachi, IBM, Logitech, Lucent, Lucky Goldstar, Microsoft, NMB, Motorola,
Northern Telecom, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, Texas Instruments, VeriFone and Zenith
Electronics. The Issuer believes its product portfolio, with an average product
life cycle of over eight years, has relatively less obsolescence risk than those
of other semiconductor companies.
Zilog's three target markets are consumer electronics, data communications
and computer peripherals:
Consumer Electronics. The increase in the use of ASSPs in consumer
electronics has created a significant market opportunity for Zilog.
Sophisticated ASSPs are increasingly found in consumer electronics such as
spread spectrum cordless telephones, audiovisual equipment, telephone answering
machines and household appliances. Other consumer electronics applications that
use Zilog's products are television controllers, infrared remote controls,
internet appliances, battery chargers, garage door openers, home security
systems, cable television systems, video cassette recorders and automotive
controllers such as airbags.
Data Communications. The data communications market is growing in response
to the need to connect computer systems at remote locations and the need for
multiple users to share peripherals such as printers and facsimile machines. By
networking computers and peripherals, it is possible to share information files,
distribute computer loads more efficiently and facilitate communications between
terminals, computers and peripherals, thereby maximizing the benefit from an
organization's investment in its installed base of computer equipment. Zilog
sells microprocessors optimized for use in the following data communications
applications: ethernet routers, bridges, data switches, modems, terminals,
printers, workstations, local area networks and wide area networks.
Computer Peripherals. Strong unit demand for personal computers and
peripherals has driven growth for ASSPs. The typical computer system may have up
to six or seven peripherals which facilitate the human interface, provide memory
functions, or service the communications link with other computers. Among the
most common peripherals are the printer, keyboard, monitor, mouse-type pointing
device, facsimile and modem. Zilog ASSPs are used in each of these applications.
45
<PAGE> 47
The following table summarizes selected applications of the Issuer's
products in the consumer electronics, data communications and computer
peripherals markets.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATA
END MARKET: CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER PERIPHERALS
- -------------------------------- ----------------------- --------------- --------------------
PERCENTAGE OF REVENUE
FOR 1997 36% 37% 27%
- -------------------------------- ----------------------- --------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Applications: Cordless phones ISDN Mouse-type pointing
Television controllers WAN device
Infrared remote
controls XDSL Keyboard
Battery chargers Modems Fax/Printer/Scanner
Household appliances ATM/frame relay PCMCIA
Meter reader
Automotive
Card reader/smart cards
Security systems
Customers: Black & Decker Cisco Acer
Samsung Lucent Hewlett-Packard
SGS-Thomson Motorola Logitech
Sharp VeriFone Microsoft
Sony NMB
Zenith
Example of Product Application: Television Modem Mouse
Transmits and Causes cursor to
Example of Zilog ASSP Function: Picture-in-Picture receives data move
</TABLE>
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Zilog believes that the continued introduction of new ASSPs in its target
markets and application support tools for these products are essential to its
growth. As of December 31, 1997, Zilog employed 140 people in research and
development. Expenditures for research and development in 1995, 1996 and 1997
were approximately $24.5 million, $30.5 million and $30.5 million, respectively,
representing approximately 9%, 10% and 12%, respectively, of sales.
Most of Zilog's new products are created by design engineers through the
use of its proprietary design library. All of the designs in Zilog's library are
produced by a subset of Zilog's standard manufacturing process. The design rules
employed ensure that the need to adjust the library is minimal as manufacturing
technology advances to smaller dimensions. Zilog employs the concept of
"concurrent engineering." Designers and process engineers work side by side in
the product definition and design stages to manufacture a new product that will
maximize efficiencies and yields when the design cycle and fabrication processes
are completed.
Zilog has three design centers with different specialties. The Campbell,
California, design center specializes in consumer electronics, while the Nampa,
Idaho, design center focuses primarily on Zilog's memory libraries. The Austin,
Texas, design center concentrates its efforts mainly on digital signal processor
products and applications. While cross-fertilization occurs, by concentrating
design efforts in these centers, engineers develop valuable expertise in their
respective areas.
MANUFACTURING
Zilog owns a substantial portion of its manufacturing resources and
believes this is an important part of its strategy. The Issuer has made
significant capital expenditures of $235 million over the last three years to
increase capacity and improve efficiency at its facilities. Direct control over
wafer fabrication, assembly and
46
<PAGE> 48
test operations allows Zilog to provide customers with continuous supply,
shorten Zilog's design and production cycles, and capture manufacturing margins.
By operating two semiconductor fabrication facilities in Nampa, Idaho,
Zilog enjoys significant manufacturing flexibility. These facilities contain
fabrication modules equipped to produce products with submicron dimensions. The
Issuer can manufacture certain ASSPs using low volume, low cost production runs
from its MOD II facility built in 1984, as well as more tightly integrated,
newly developed ASSPs from its MOD III facility built in 1996. Additionally, the
Issuer's facilities enable Zilog to produce mixed-signal (analog-digital
conversion) ASSPs. Zilog's MOD III facility is currently producing ASSPs at 0.65
micron dimensions and produced its first test wafers at 0.35 micron dimensions
in January 1998. Overall, the Issuer estimates its facilities are operating at
60% capacity which should enable the Issuer to capitalize on future upswings in
industry demand. The Issuer further believes that its manufacturing facilities
provide cost and quality competitive advantages. In addition, the Issuer
conducts high volume assembly and test operations in two facilities in the
Philippines. Zilog also uses outside contract assemblers for packaging a portion
of its products. Although the Issuer believes that its manufacturing facilities
will remain competitive in the current market environment without additional
significant capital expenditures, and that the Issuer's manufacturing, assembly
and test facilities are among the most efficient in the industry, the Issuer is
considering manufacturing alternatives to increase the efficiency of production
of its products.
The Idaho and Philippines plants operate 24 hours per day, seven days a
week. Automated data collection and analysis systems are used to maintain
efficient manufacturing line loading and to assure that the production mix is in
accord with the Issuer's sales order forecast. Zilog is considering alternative
shift structures to lessen its costs. A skilled workforce is very important to
high productivity in semiconductor manufacturing. Zilog maintains an extensive
personnel training and certification program in its plants and believes that
this leads to lower turnover and higher worker involvement. All of Zilog's
operations are managed through the use of statistical process control
techniques.
SALES AND MARKETING
In 1997, Zilog shipped its products to over 800 customers through its
direct sales force and through manufacturers' sales representatives and
distributors. The Issuer's products are sold to manufacturers in the consumer
electronics, data communications and computer peripherals markets as well as the
military and aerospace industries. Zilog's worldwide headquarters are in
Campbell, California. The Issuer has sales offices located in the metropolitan
areas of Atlanta, Boston, Boulder, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, El Paso,
Minneapolis, Orange County, Philadelphia, Portland, San Diego, Beijing, Erfurt,
Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, London, Munich, Seoul, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Singapore,
Taipei, Teichung, Tokyo, Toronto and Vancouver. Each of these offices has a
direct sales force who calls on large accounts and manages the activities of
Zilog's 31 sales representative organizations. The Issuer frequently holds
technical sales conferences and training sessions for its direct sales and sales
representative personnel. Zilog is considering consolidation of its sales force
to reduce costs and to more efficiently meet the requirements of its customers.
Zilog's direct marketing force consists of technical specialists and field
application engineers. Zilog's technical specialists are based at corporate
headquarters and focus exclusively on one of consumer electronics, data
communications or computer peripherals applications. Field application engineers
are located in Zilog's sales offices around the world and work directly with
local customers in close consultation with the Issuer's technical specialists.
Field application engineers typically develop technology expertise in the market
segment which is most prominent in their geographic area.
Zilog also markets and sells its products through four North American
distributors and 32 international distributors. As is common in the
semiconductor industry, Zilog grants price protection and limited rights of
return to distributors. In certain circumstances, distributors are granted a
credit for the difference between the price they were originally charged for
products in inventory at the time of a price reduction and the reduced price
which Zilog subsequently charges. In 1997, the aggregate amount of this credit
was $67,000.
For the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, sales to customers
located outside of the United States aggregated approximately 57%, 56% and 59%,
respectively, of sales for these periods. Total sales to
47
<PAGE> 49
these international customers in each of such periods were approximately $150.4
million, $166.9 million and $154.3 million, respectively. See "Risk
Factors -- Export Sales; International Operations."
During the year ended December 31, 1997, no single customer represented
more than 8% of Zilog's sales and no distributor accounted for more than 7% of
Zilog's sales. Zilog believes that its customer and geographic balance help it
to reduce volatility in operating results.
COMPETITION
The principal competitive factors in Zilog's markets include design and
end-market applications expertise, product features and performance, including
the ability to preserve the customers' software, price, time to market and
manufacturing. Zilog believes its competitive strengths include its expertise in
the technology of a broad range of applications in the consumer electronics,
data communications and computer peripherals markets, its design methodology
which includes its design system with its extensive library of customer familiar
cores and cells, and its manufacturing facilities and capabilities.
The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by
price erosion, rapid technological change and heightened foreign competition in
many markets. The industry consists of major domestic and international
semiconductor companies, many of which have substantially greater financial and
other resources than Zilog with which to pursue engineering, manufacturing,
marketing and distribution of their products. Emerging companies are also
expected to increase their participation in the semiconductor market. The
ability of Zilog to compete successfully in its markets depends on factors both
within and outside of its control, including, but not limited to, success in
designing and manufacturing new products that implement new technologies,
protection of the Issuer products by effective utilization of intellectual
property laws, product quality, reliability, ease of use, price, diversity of
product line, efficiency of production, the pace at which customers incorporate
Zilog's microcontrollers, microprocessors and digital signal processors into
their products, success of competitors' products and general economic
conditions.
Zilog competes with its licensees on certain products. With respect to
certain products, Zilog competes with other ASSP manufacturers which target the
same specific market segment. However, no single competitor addresses exactly
the same set of products or markets as Zilog.
PATENTS AND LICENSES
Zilog holds 94 United States patents and has 14 United States patent
applications pending, as well as 16 pending foreign patent applications. Zilog
has also filed and received one patent outside of the United States. Zilog has
more than 49 United States mask work registrations on its products. Copyright
registrations are held by Zilog to protect proprietary software employed in over
100 of its products. The Issuer has claimed more than 40 trademarks or
servicemarks.
Zilog's ability to compete may be enhanced by its ability to protect its
proprietary information, including the issuance of patents, copyrights, mask
work registrations and trademarks. Only a few of these intellectual property
rights have been litigated. While no intellectual property right of Zilog has
been invalidated or declared unenforceable, there can be no assurance that such
rights will be upheld in the future. Accordingly, management believes that, in
view of the rapid pace of technological change in the semiconductor industry,
the technical experience and creative skills of the Issuer's engineers and other
personnel will be extremely important in determining Zilog's future
technological success.
Zilog has more than 100 active licenses for product or technology exchange.
The purpose of these licenses has, in general, been to provide second sources
for standard products or to convey or receive rights to certain proprietary or
patented cores, cells or other technology.
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, Zilog has from time to time
received, and may in the future receive, communications from third parties
asserting patent rights, mask work rights, copyrights or trademark rights
covering certain of Zilog's products, technologies or information. See "Risk
Factors -- Intellectual Property Rights."
48
<PAGE> 50
PROPERTIES
Zilog's headquarters and research and development facilities are located at
910 East Hamilton Avenue, Campbell, California. Zilog executed a six-year lease
on this new 108,000 square foot headquarters and research and development
facility commencing May 1, 1998. Zilog performs wafer fabrication at its 77,000
square foot and 128,000 square foot buildings located on a 65-acre site in
Nampa, Idaho. Zilog owns these Idaho facilities.
Assembly and test operations are performed at Zilog's two facilities in
Manila, the Philippines, which are 54,000 square feet and 34,000 square feet,
respectively. Zilog owns the larger facility subject to a ground lease which
expires in 2004, and leases the second Manila facility. This lease expires in
July 1998, but has an option for Zilog to renew for a term of five years. Zilog
has leased a 4,000 square foot engineering design center in Austin, Texas. This
lease expires in March 1998, prior to which time the Issuer plans to move this
facility to a new location. In addition, Zilog has short-term leases for its
sales offices located around the world in the United States, Canada, England,
Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the People's Republic of China,
Singapore and Taiwan.
EMPLOYEES
As of April 5, 1998, Zilog employed 1,706 full-time persons, including
1,302 in manufacturing, 145 in research and development, 192 in sales and
marketing and 67 in finance and administration. Approximately one-half of
Zilog's employees work at its assembly and test facilities located in Manila,
the Philippines. Zilog considers its relations with its employees to be good.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Zilog is subject to a variety of government regulations related to the
discharge or disposal of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used
in its manufacturing process, including the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,
the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act, the Clean Air Act and the Water
Pollution Control Act. Zilog believes it has also obtained all necessary
environmental permits to conduct its business, which generally relate to the
discharge of hazardous wastes. Nevertheless, the failure to comply with present
or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on Zilog, suspension
of production or cessation of operations. Such regulations could require the
Issuer to acquire significant equipment or to incur substantial other expenses
to comply with environmental regulations. Any failure by Zilog to control the
use of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances could
subject it to future liabilities.
In 1996, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho entered orders
approving a settlement in the lawsuit entitled Tsotung Ko, et al. v. Zilog, Inc.
In the suit, 31 plaintiffs alleged that the Issuer endangered their health and
safety by chemical exposures at one of the Issuer's Nampa, Idaho facilities. In
addition, the plaintiffs alleged that the Issuer discriminated against them
after they were injured by chemical exposures. Although the Issuer made payments
in connection with the settlement, the Issuer strongly denied these allegations.
In January 1998, the newspaper USA Today published a series of articles
about environmental and employee health and safety conditions at semiconductor
manufacturing facilities. The Issuer's operations during 1993 and 1994 and the
Tsotung Ko lawsuit were the primary subject of one article and were mentioned in
several other articles. Since 1993, the Issuer has constructed its MOD III
facility, expanded MOD II, closed MOD I and has upgraded the environmental
monitoring and control equipment at its MOD II facility. The Issuer believes it
is in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental and employee
health and safety regulations. However, this recent public attention focused on
the environmental and employee health and safety conditions at the Issuer's
facilities could increase the incidence of environmental or employee health and
safety complaints or governmental investigations into the Issuer's operations.
Zilog recently underwent a multimedia inspection by the Environmental Protection
Agency and various state and local agencies and a separate detailed inspection
by OSHA. While the Issuer has not received all of the final reports from these
investigations, the Issuer believes that it remains in compliance with all
material environmental,
49
<PAGE> 51
health and safety regulations and that the foregoing inspections will not result
in any fines or penalties for non-compliance with such regulations. There can be
no assurance that the Issuer will not incur significant expense in connection
with these and other governmental investigations and/or environmental or
employee health and safety matters.
LEGAL MATTERS
The Issuer has been named as a defendant in a purported class action
lawsuit which was filed on January 23, 1998 in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California. Certain executive officers of the
Issuer are also named as defendants. The plaintiff purports to represent a class
of all persons who purchased the Issuer's Common Stock during the Class Period.
The complaint alleges that the Issuer and certain of its executive officers made
false and misleading statements regarding the Issuer that caused the market
price of its Common Stock to be "artificially inflated" during the Class Period.
The complaint does not specify the amount of damages sought. The Issuer believes
the lawsuit lacks merit and intends to defend it vigorously. There can be no
assurance that the Issuer will prevail in its defense of the lawsuit or that any
judgment against the Issuer will not be material.
Zilog is participating in other litigation and responding to claims arising
in the ordinary course of business. Zilog intends to defend itself vigorously in
these matters. Zilog's management believes that it is unlikely that the outcome
of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Issuer, although
there can be no assurance in this regard.
50
<PAGE> 52
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding individuals
who are serving as directors and executive officers of Zilog. It is anticipated
that additional individuals will be elected to serve as directors of Zilog. Each
director will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until
his or her successor is elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by the
Board of Directors and serve at the Board's discretion.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Curtis J. Crawford....................... 50 President and Chief Executive Officer; Director
William S. Price III..................... 42 Director
David M. Stanton......................... 36 Director
Carrie A. Wheeler........................ 26 Director
Michael J. Bradshaw...................... 49 Senior Vice President, Operations
Thomas C. Carson III..................... 57 Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales
Richard L. Moore......................... 62 Senior Vice President, Technology
Gerald J. Corvino........................ 50 Senior Vice President and Chief Information
Officer
W. Norman Wu............................. 45 Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy
Officer
James M. Thorburn........................ 50 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Richard R. Pickard....................... 44 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
</TABLE>
Curtis J. Crawford became President, Chief Executive Officer and a director
of the Issuer upon consummation of the Recapitalization. From 1997 to 1998, Mr.
Crawford was Group President of the Microelectronics Group and President of the
Intellectual Property division of Lucent (a successor to certain AT&T
businesses). From 1995 to 1997, he was the President of the Microelectronics
Group. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Crawford was President of AT&T Microelectronics, a
business unit of AT&T Corporation. From 1991 to 1993, he held the position of
Vice President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Microelectronics. From
1988 to 1991, he held the position of Vice President, Sales, Service and Support
for AT&T Computer Systems. Prior thereto, he served in various sales, marketing
and executive management positions at various divisions of IBM. Mr. Crawford
holds a B.A. degree in Business Administration and Computer Sciences and a
Master of Arts degree in Marketing from Governors State University. In addition,
he received an M.B.A. from the Charles H. Kellstadt Graduate School of Business
at DePaul University in 1977 and was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from
Governors State University in 1996. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board
of Directors of the i-STAT Corporation, and as a member of the Board of
Directors of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and ITT Industries, Inc. Mr.
Crawford previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of Lyondell
Petrochemical Company, The Sisters of Mercy Hospital Corporation and the SIA.
William S. Price III became a director of Zilog upon consummation of the
Recapitalization. Mr. Price was a founding partner of TPG in 1993. Prior to
forming TPG, Mr. Price was Vice President of Strategic Planning and Business
Development for GE Capital, and from 1985 to 1991 he was employed by the
management consulting firm of Bain & Company, attaining partnership status and
acting as co-head of the Financial Services Practice. Mr. Price is a graduate of
Stanford University and received a J.D. degree from the Boalt Hall School of Law
at the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Price is Chairman of the Board of
Favorite Brands International, Inc. and Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Beringer Wine Estates. He also serves on the Boards of Directors of Belden &
Blake Corporation, Continental Airlines, Inc., Continental Micronesia, Inc.,
Denbury Resources, Inc. and Vivra Specialty Partners, Inc.
David M. Stanton became a director of Zilog upon consummation of the
Recapitalization. Mr. Stanton is a partner of TPG. From 1991 until he joined TPG
in 1994, Mr. Stanton was a venture capitalist with Trinity Ventures, where he
specialized in information technology, software and telecommunications
investing. Mr. Stanton holds a B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from Stanford
University and an M.B.A. from the
51
<PAGE> 53
Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. Stanton serves on the Boards of
Directors of Belden & Blake Corporation, Denbury Resources, Inc., GlobeSpan
Semiconductor, Inc., Paradyne Corporation and TPG Communications, Inc.
Carrie A. Wheeler became a director of Zilog upon consummation of the
Recapitalization. Ms. Wheeler has served as a Vice President of TPG since 1996.
Prior to joining TPG, Ms. Wheeler was a financial analyst in the Mergers and
Acquisitions Department and the Principal Investment Area of Goldman, Sachs &
Co. from 1993 to 1996. Ms. Wheeler holds a Bachelors of Commerce Honours degree
from Queen's University.
Michael J. Bradshaw has served as Senior Vice President, Operations since
March 1992. Previously he served as Vice President, Operations since the
Issuer's inception in June 1989 and served as the head of the Operations Group
of the Issuer's predecessor since March 1985. Before joining Zilog, Mr. Bradshaw
was employed by Texas Instruments and Mostek Corporation, both semiconductor
manufacturers, where he served as Director of Worldwide Planning. Immediately
prior to his employment by the Issuer's predecessor, he was the Vice President,
Operations Planning and Control of General Instrument Microelectronics. He holds
a B.S. degree in Engineering Mathematics, with concentration in electrical
engineering, from the Missouri School of Mines, and Masters degrees in Business
Administration and Science Administration from the University of Houston.
Thomas C. Carson III became Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales in
January 1993. From March 1992 to January 1993, he served as Vice President,
Sales, after having joined Zilog in 1987 as Director, Worldwide Sales. Mr.
Carson has been a sales and marketing executive for more than 25 years.
Previously, he held the positions of Vice President of Sales at Raytheon Data
Systems, Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Datastream Communications,
and Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Enhansys, Inc. Prior to that, Mr.
Carson was employed by IBM for more than 17 years, where he held several key
sales and marketing management positions. Mr. Carson holds a B.A. in Economics
and Mathematics from East Tennessee State University and pursued post graduate
studies in the M.B.A. program at the University of Tennessee.
Richard L. Moore has served as Senior Vice President, Technology since June
1996. From May 1995 to May 1996, he served as Vice President, Technology. Prior
to joining Zilog, Mr. Moore served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cromemco, Inc., a client/server computer manufacturer, from October 1988 to May
1995. Mr. Moore has worked in various other managerial and executive capacities
in the computer and semiconductor industries for the past 35 years. Mr. Moore
holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas (El Paso)
and an M.B.A. from Saint Mary's College (Moraga, California).
Gerald J. Corvino has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information
Officer since June 1998. Prior to joining Zilog, Mr. Corvino served as Chief
Information Officer for Oracle Corporation from 1996 to 1998, as Chief
Information Officer for AT&T Microelectronics from 1994 to 1996 and as Vice
President Corporate Information Services at Amdahl from 1978 to 1994. Mr.
Corvino is certified for Managing Information Systems Resources from Harvard
Business School.
W. Norman Wu has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer
since June 1998. Prior to joining Zilog, Mr. Wu served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Avantos Performance Systems, Inc., a management software
company he co-founded in 1991. Mr. Wu holds a B.S. and M.S. degree in Electrical
Engineering from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University.
James M. Thorburn has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer since May 1998. Prior to joining Zilog, Mr. Thorburn served as Vice
President of Operations Finance at National Semiconductor and managed the
financial needs for National Semiconductor's Communications and Computing Group
Analog division, and European Operations. Mr. Thorburn holds a B.S. in Economics
from the University of Glasgow.
Richard R. Pickard has served as Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary since March 1992. From June 1989 to March 1992, he served as General
Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Pickard was General Counsel and Secretary of the
predecessor company from 1987 through June 1989. Before joining Zilog, Mr.
Pickard served as Corporate Counsel at NEC Electronics, Inc., a semiconductor
company, and in private
52
<PAGE> 54
practice. Mr. Pickard holds a B.A. in American Civilization from Williams
College and a J.D. from the College of William and Mary.
The aggregate cash and non-cash compensation paid by Zilog during 1997 to
its five most highly compensated executive officers was approximately $2.2
million.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL
ARRANGEMENTS
The Issuer entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Crawford, which
provides that, for a period of five years commencing on the consummation date of
the Recapitalization, Mr. Crawford will serve as President and CEO of Zilog and
as a member of its Board of Directors. The employment agreement provides for an
annual base salary of $800,000, and an annual target bonus of at least $600,000
provided the Issuer achieves certain performance objectives to be determined
each year, except that, with respect to calendar year 1998, a minimum bonus of
$600,000 will be paid in January 1999.
Upon commencement of his employment with the Issuer, Mr. Crawford received
a $1.0 million bonus and the Issuer intends to establish on January 1, 1999 a
deferred compensation account of $8.0 million, which will earn interest of 8%
per annum, compounded annually. The $8.0 million plus earnings will be paid to
Mr. Crawford on January 2, 2002 or earlier, if Mr. Crawford elects, upon the
occurrence of (i) a change in control of the Issuer (as defined in the
employment agreement), (ii) a public offering (as defined in the employment
agreement) of any class of stock of the Issuer or (iii) the termination of Mr.
Crawford's employment with the Issuer, provided that, if Mr. Crawford
voluntarily resigns his employment with the Issuer prior to January 1, 1999, he
shall forfeit all rights to the $8.0 million payment. If Mr. Crawford
voluntarily resigns his employment with the Issuer prior to January 5, 1999 and
returns to his former employer without Zilog's consent, he shall forfeit all
rights to the $1.0 million bonus.
The Issuer will also grant Mr. Crawford 50,000 shares of Common Stock on
each of May 1, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 (all share and share price information
in this paragraph give effect to a 4-for-1 stock split declared after
consummation of the Recapitalization). Such shares shall become fully
deliverable prior to such dates on the earlier to occur of (i) a change in
control, (ii) a public offering or (iii) if Mr. Crawford ceases to be employed
with the Issuer for any reason, provided that, if Mr. Crawford voluntarily
resigns his employment prior to January 5, 1999 and returns to his former
employer without Zilog's consent, he shall return any shares granted and shall
forfeit any shares that have not yet been granted. Finally, the employment
agreement provides that the Issuer will grant Mr. Crawford the option to
purchase 500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share
(the "$5 Option") and 500,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of
$10.00 per share (the "$10 Option"). The $5 Option and the $10 Option will each
become exercisable as follows: (i) 62,500 shares on the date the
Recapitalization is consummated, (ii) 62,500 shares on December 31, 1998 and
(iii) 31,250 shares at the end of each calendar quarter in each of calendar
years 1999, 2000 and 2001. The options will also become immediately exercisable
in full upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) a change in
control of the Issuer, (ii) a public offering or (iii) the termination of Mr.
Crawford's employment by the Issuer without cause (as defined in the employment
agreement), by Mr. Crawford for good reason (as defined in the employment
agreement) or on account of Mr. Crawford's death or permanent disability. If Mr.
Crawford voluntarily resigns his employment with the Issuer for any reason, he
shall forfeit any unvested options. Mr. Crawford will have the right to require
the Issuer to register his shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to such
option on May 1, 2001, or, at the Issuer's option in lieu of registering such
shares, to purchase such shares from Mr. Crawford at an appraised fair market
value on such date.
Dr. Sack stepped down as CEO following consummation of the Merger. Pursuant
to Dr. Sack's employment agreement, upon such resignation, Dr. Sack became
entitled to receive the following payments in a cash lump sum: (a) the current
base salary for the period remaining under his employment agreement, (b) payouts
under Zilog's Employee Performance Incentive Plan for awards granted prior to
the effective date of termination of employment, and (c) payouts under Zilog's
Executive Bonus Plan for awards granted prior to the effective date of
termination of employment. In addition, Dr. Sack is entitled to continue his
participation in group insurance plans, including basic and supplemental life
insurance and disability insurance
53
<PAGE> 55
and health insurance and the flexible spending plan for the health insurance and
dependent care coverage, maintained by Zilog for an additional 24 months. In
addition, upon consummation of the Merger, all of Dr. Sack's outstanding stock
options became fully vested, were canceled and Dr. Sack received cash for the
difference, if any, between the exercise price and $20.00. See "The
Recapitalization."
Pursuant to the employment agreements between Zilog and each of Sally
Baumwell, Michael J. Bradshaw, Robert Collins, J. James Magill, Richard L.
Moore, Richard R. Pickard, Alan Secor and Thomas C. Carson III, upon
consummation of the Merger, the term of each such executive officer's employment
was automatically extended for 24 months from the earlier of the Effective Time
or the expiration date of each respective employment agreement. If any of such
executive officers terminates employment with Zilog after the Effective Time,
either voluntarily for Good Reason (as defined in each respective employment
agreement) or involuntarily for reasons other than for Cause or Detrimental
Activity (as defined in each respective employment agreement): (i) the executive
officer will be entitled to receive the following payments in a cash lump sum:
(a) the then current base salary for the period remaining under the employment
agreement, (b) payouts under Zilog's Employee Performance Incentive Plan for
awards granted prior to the effective date of termination of employment, and (c)
payouts under Zilog's Executive Bonus Plan for awards granted prior to the
effective date of termination of employment; (ii) the executive officer's
unvested stock options granted after the Effective Time and outstanding as of
the date of such termination will continue to vest for the period of time
remaining under the employment agreement; and (iii) the executive officer will
be entitled to continue participation in group insurance plans, including basic
and supplemental life insurance and disability insurance and health insurance
and the flexible spending plan for the health insurance and dependent care
coverage, maintained by Zilog through the expiration of the term of the
employment agreement. In addition, upon consummation of the Merger, all of the
above executives' outstanding stock options became fully vested, were canceled
and they received cash for the difference, if any, between the exercise price
and $20.00. See "The Recapitalization."
Alan Secor resigned as Vice President and General Manager, Consumer
Products Division, in May 1998. Pursuant to the terms of his employment
agreement, Mr. Secor received a lump cash payment of approximately $465,512.
Sally Baumwell resigned as Vice President of Human Resources and
Administration in May 1998. Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement,
Ms. Baumwell received a lump sum cash payment of approximately $363,540.
Robert Collins resigned as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in
May 1998. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Collins
received a lump sum cash payment of approximately $331,250.
J. James Magill resigned as Vice President and General Manager, Data
Communications Division in May 1998. Pursuant to the terms of his employment
agreement, Mr. Magill received a lump sum cash payment of approximately
$367,208.
54
<PAGE> 56
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the annual compensation, long-term
compensation and other compensation paid to each individual serving as its chief
executive officer during 1997 and to each of the four other most highly
compensated executive officers of Zilog during the years ended December 31,
1995, 1996 and 1997.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION(1)
---------------
AWARDS
---------------
SECURITIES
ANNUAL COMPENSATION(1) UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND ----------------------- OPTIONS/ COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($) SAR(#)(2) ($)(3)
------------------ ---- ---------- --------- --------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
E.A. Sack(4)..................... 1997 $526,435 $306,276 115,350 $17,538
President and CEO 1996 511,750 491,376 60,700 16,869
1995 467,866 445,050 75,000 16,557
M.J. Bradshaw.................... 1997 220,823 62,331 20,350 17,538
Senior Vice President, Operations 1996 212,116 87,588 83,275(5) 16,869
1995 206,157 94,650 25,100 16,557
R.L. Moore....................... 1997 215,004 69,834 20,350 17,538
Senior Vice President, Technology 1996 195,185 75,120 116,400(6) 15,008
1995(7) 99,692 54,000 45,000 5,641
A. Secor(8)...................... 1997 218,369 54,448 20,350 17,538
Vice President and General
Manager, 1996 215,615 79,358 52,150(9) 16,869
Consumer Products Division 1995 214,854 85,913 20,000 16,557
T.C. Carson...................... 1997 217,390 42,468 35,100 17,538
Senior Vice President Sales and 1996 169,995 45,948 82,100(10) 16,869
Strategic Marketing 1995 198,585 121,650 25,000 16,557
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) No "Other Annual Compensation," "Restricted Stock Award(s)" or "LTIP
Payouts" were made to the Executive Officers during 1995, 1996 or 1997.
(2) Securities underlying Option/SAR share numbers reflect the effect of a
3-for-2 stock split to shareholders of record on February 1, 1993, paid on
February 15, 1993.
(3) Amounts represent the Issuer's matching and discretionary contributions to
the Zilog, Inc. Tax-Deferred 401(k) Investment Plan, and the Issuer's
contribution to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
(4) Dr. Sack resigned from Zilog effective upon the consummation of the Merger
on February 27, 1998.
(5) Includes options granted on November 6, 1996 for 11,250 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on June 1, 1994, 525 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on December 15, 1994, 100 shares
upon cancellation of a previous option granted on March 23, 1995, 25,000
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on April 6, 1995, 700
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on January 17, 1996,
and 20,000 shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on
February 21, 1996.
(6) Includes options granted on November 6, 1996 for 40,000 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on June 14, 1995, 5,000 shares
upon cancellation of a previous option granted on November 16, 1995, 700
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on January 17, 1996,
20,000 shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on February
21, 1996, 10,000 shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on
May 16, 1996, and 5,000 shares upon cancellation of a previous option
granted on July 16, 1996.
(7) Mr. Moore joined Zilog in May 1995.
(8) Mr. Secor resigned from Zilog in May 1998.
55
<PAGE> 57
(9) Includes options granted on November 6, 1996 for 10,000 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on June 1, 1994, 700 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on December 15, 1994, 20,000
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on April 6, 1995, 700
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on January 17, 1996,
and 20,000 shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on July
16, 1996.
(10) Includes options granted on November 6, 1996 for 15,000 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on June 1, 1994, 700 shares upon
cancellation of a previous option granted on December 15, 1994, 25,000
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on April 6, 1995, 700
shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on January 17, 1996
and 20,000 shares upon cancellation of a previous option granted on
February 21, 1996.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
The following table provides information with respect to the aggregate
option exercises and fiscal year-end option values for each of Zilog's Named
Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VALUE OF
SECURITIES UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING IN-THE MONEY
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS/SARS
OPTIONS/SARS AT FISCAL
AT FISCAL YEAR-END(#) YEAR-END($)
--------------------- ----------------
ACQUIRED ON VALUE EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME EXERCISE(#) REALIZED($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE(1)
---- ----------- ----------- --------------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
E. A. Sack(2).................... 0 $0 408,325/206,250 $2,002,726/ 0
M. J. Bradshaw................... 0 $0 148,313/ 56,275 43,250/ 0
R. L. Moore...................... 0 $0 31,425/ 69,625 0/ 0
A. Secor(3)...................... 0 $0 96,538/ 41,262 127,649/69
T. C. Carson III................. 0 $0 117,275/ 67,225 145,000/ 0
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) These amounts represent the difference between the exercise price of the
stock options and the closing price of the Issuer's Common Stock on December
31, 1997, for options held by each Named Executive Officer.
(2) Dr. Sack resigned from Zilog effective upon the consummation of the Merger
on February 27, 1998.
(3) Mr. Secor resigned from Zilog in May 1998.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In connection with the Merger, Zilog paid TPG II and certain affiliates
financial advisory and other fees and reimbursed certain expenses, in an
aggregate amount of approximately [$8] million.
In connection with the Merger, TPG II and certain other investors received
3,375,000 new shares of Common Stock, 1,250,000 shares of Non-Voting Common
Stock and 250,000 shares of Preferred Stock of Zilog, the surviving corporation.
The Preferred Stock has initial liquidation value of $100 per share. The
Preferred Stock will accumulate dividends at the rate of 13.5% per annum payable
quarterly for periods ending on or prior to February 26, 2008. Dividends will
compound to the extent not paid in cash. On February 27, 2008, Zilog will be
required to pay in cash all accumulated but unpaid dividends on the Preferred
Stock. Thereafter, the Preferred Stock will accumulate dividends at the rate of
15.5% per annum. Subject to restrictions imposed by certain indebtedness of
Zilog, Zilog will be able (but not required) to redeem shares of the Preferred
Stock at any time at redemption prices ranging from 105% of liquidation value
plus accumulated and unpaid dividends at February 27, 1998 to 100% of
liquidation value plus accumulated and unpaid dividends at February 27, 2003 and
thereafter. In certain circumstances involving a change of control of Zilog,
subject to restrictions imposed by certain indebtedness of Zilog, holders of
Preferred Stock will be able (but not required) to require Zilog to repurchase
shares of Preferred Stock at liquidation value plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends.
56
<PAGE> 58
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK
The authorized capital stock of Zilog consists of 35,000,000 shares of
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, 15,000,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
par value $100.00 per share.
COMMON STOCK
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders. Approval of matters brought before the
stockholders will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the holders of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock, except as otherwise required by the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"). Holders of Class
A Non-Voting Common Stock do not have any voting rights, except the right to
vote as a class to the extent required by the DGCL.
Except for differences in voting rights described above, the rights,
powers, preferences and limitations of the Common Stock and Class A Non-Voting
Common Stock are identical. Subject to the rights of holders of Preferred Stock
and other classes and/or series of preferred stock, if any, all shares of Common
Stock and Class A Non-Voting Common Stock are entitled to share in such
dividends as the Board of Directors may from time to time declare from sources
legally available therefor. Subject to the rights of creditors and holders of
Preferred Stock and other classes and/or series of preferred stock, if any,
holders of Common Stock and Class A Non-Voting Common Stock are entitled to
share ratably in a distribution of assets of the Surviving Corporation upon any
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Surviving Corporation.
PREFERRED STOCK
There are currently 250,000 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. Under
the Issuer's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors has
the authority to issue, from time to time, by resolution and without any action
by stockholders, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $100.00
per share, in one or more classes and/or series and may establish the powers,
designations, preferences, rights and qualifications, limitations or
restrictions (which may differ with respect to each such class and/or series) of
such class and/or series. Upon consummation of the Recapitalization, the Board
of Directors adopted a resolution providing for the creation of a Series of
Preferred Stock into which the shares of capital stock of Merger Sub were
converted in the Merger. The Preferred Stock is a non-voting, 13.5% pay-in-kind
preferred stock with a stated value of $100.00 per share (the "Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock").
The Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock accumulates dividends at the rate
of 13.5% per annum (payable quarterly) for periods ending on or prior to the
anniversary of the Effective Time in 2008, and 15.5% per annum thereafter.
Dividends will be payable, at the election of the Board of Directors but subject
to availability of funds and the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, in cash
or in kind through a corresponding increase in the liquidation preference (as
described below) of the Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock. The Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock has an initial liquidation preference of $100.00 per
share.
To the extent that a quarterly dividend payment in respect of a share of
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock is not made in cash when due, the amount of
such unpaid dividend will accumulate (whether or not declared by the Board of
Directors) through an increase in the liquidation preference of such share of
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock equal to the amount of such unpaid dividend,
and compounding dividends will accumulate on all such accumulated and unpaid
dividends. The liquidation preference will be reduced to the extent that
previously accumulated dividends are thereafter paid in cash. The Issuer is
required on the anniversary of the Effective Time in 2008 to pay in cash all
accumulated dividends that have been applied to increase the liquidation
preference (the "Clean-Down").
Shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option
of the Issuer, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices ranging from 105%,
if redeemed prior to the six-month anniversary of the Effective Time in 1998, to
100%, if redeemed after the six-month anniversary of the Effective Time in 2003,
in
57
<PAGE> 59
each case of the sum of (i) the liquidation preference thereof, increased to the
extent that accumulated dividends thereon shall not have been paid in cash, plus
(ii) accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date of redemption. Optional
redemption of the Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock will be subject to, and
expressly conditioned upon, certain limitations under the Revolving Credit
Facility.
In certain circumstances, including the occurrence of a change of control
of the Issuer, but again subject to certain limitations under the Revolving
Credit Facility, the Issuer may be required to repurchase shares of Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock at 101% of the sum of the liquidation preference
thereof, increased to the extent that accumulated dividends thereon shall not
have been paid in cash, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to the repurchase
date.
Holders of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock do not have any voting
rights with respect thereto, except for (i) such rights as are provided under
the DGCL, (ii) the right to elect, as a class, one director of the Issuer in the
event that the Issuer fails to comply with its Clean-Down or repurchase
obligations and (iii) class voting rights with respect to transactions adversely
affecting the rights, preferences or powers of the Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock and certain transactions involving stock that ranks junior in payment of
dividends, or upon liquidation, to the Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As of the consummation date of the Recapitalization, TPG II and certain
related investors owned 3,375,000 shares of Common Stock, 1,250,000 shares of
Class A Non-Voting Common Stock and 250,000 shares of Series A Cumulative
Preferred Stock, representing in the aggregate, approximately 94% of total
equity capital and 90% of the voting interests of Zilog.
58
<PAGE> 60
DESCRIPTION OF REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY
On the closing date of the Recapitalization, Merger Sub and Zilog entered
into the Revolving Credit Facility with the several lenders from time to time
parties thereto (the "Lenders"), Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as arranger
and syndication agent, and BankBoston, N.A., as administrative agent for the
Lenders. The following is a summary description of the principal terms of the
Revolving Credit Facility and the other loan documents. The description set
forth below does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to certain agreements setting forth the principal terms and conditions
of the Revolving Credit Facility.
STRUCTURE
The Lenders have committed, subject to compliance with certain conditions,
to provide Zilog with a five-year senior secured Revolving Credit Facility of up
to $25.0 million. To date, no amounts have been borrowed under the Revolving
Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility may be utilized to fund Zilog's
working capital requirements, including issuance of standby letters of credit,
and for other general corporate purposes. Loans and letters of credit under the
Revolving Credit Facility will be available at any time during its five-year
term subject to a borrowing base consisting of 80% of eligible accounts
receivable and 25% of eligible inventory and the fulfillment of customary
conditions precedent including the absence of any default under the Revolving
Credit Facility.
SECURITY; GUARANTY
Zilog's obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed, to
the extent no adverse tax consequences would result, by each of Zilog's foreign
subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are
secured by a perfected first priority security interest in all of the accounts
receivable and inventory and proceeds thereof of Zilog and, to the extent no
adverse tax consequences would result, foreign subsidiaries.
INTEREST
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per
annum equal (at Zilog's option) to: (i) the "Eurodollar Rate" (as defined below)
plus an applicable margin or (ii) a base rate equal to the higher of the
Administrative Agent's base rate or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 1/2 of
1% plus, in each case, an applicable margin. Initially, the applicable margin is
expected to be 2.50% for Eurodollar rate loans and 1.50% for base rate loans.
"Eurodollar Rate" means the Eurodollar rate appearing on the Telerate Page 3750.
FEES
Zilog is required to pay the Lenders, on a quarterly basis, a commitment
fee on the undrawn portion of the Revolving Credit Facility at a rate initially
equal to 1/2 of 1% per annum. Zilog is also obligated to pay (i) a per annum
letter of credit fee on the aggregate amount of outstanding letters of credit;
(ii) a fronting bank fee for the letter of credit issuing bank; and (iii)
customary agent, arrangement and other similar fees.
COVENANTS
The Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among
other things, restricts the ability of Zilog and its subsidiaries to dispose of
assets; incur additional indebtedness; prepay other indebtedness or amend
certain debt instruments (including the Indenture); pay dividends; create liens
on assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; make capital
expenditures; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions; engage in
mergers or consolidations; change the business conducted by Zilog or its
subsidiaries; or engage in certain transactions with affiliates and otherwise
restrict certain corporate activities. In addition, under the Revolving Credit
Facility, Zilog is required to maintain specified financial ratios and tests,
including minimum interest coverage ratios, minimum fixed charge coverage ratios
and leverage ratios below a specified maximum.
59
<PAGE> 61
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
The Revolving Credit Facility contains customary events of default,
including nonpayment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants,
cross default and cross-acceleration to certain other indebtedness, certain
events of bankruptcy and insolvency, material judgments against Zilog,
invalidity of any guaranty or security interest and a change of control of Zilog
in certain circumstances as set forth therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
for the first year following the closing date of the Merger, Zilog's failure to
be in compliance with the covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility
shall not, with certain specified exceptions, constitute an event of default so
long as no loans or letters of credit are outstanding thereunder.
60
<PAGE> 62
DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW NOTES
GENERAL
The Old Notes were, and the New Notes will be, issued pursuant to the
Indenture which is dated as of February 27, 1998 and is between the Issuer and
the Trustee. The terms of the New Notes will include those stated in the
Indenture and those made part of the Indenture by reference to the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939 (the "Trust Indenture Act"). The New Notes will be subject
to all such terms, and prospective holders of New Notes are referred to the
Indenture and the Trust Indenture Act for a statement thereof. The following
summary of the material provisions of the Indenture does not purport to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Indenture,
including the definitions therein of certain terms used below. Copies of the
proposed form of Indenture and Registration Rights Agreement are available as
set forth below under "Available Information." The definitions of certain terms
used in the following summary are set forth below under "-- Certain
Definitions."
RANKING
The New Notes will rank senior in right of payment to all subordinated
Indebtedness of the Issuer and pari passu in right of payment with all
unsubordinated borrowings.
The New Notes will be effectively subordinated to all indebtedness and
other liabilities and commitments (including trade payables and capital lease
obligations) of the Issuer's foreign subsidiaries. Any right of the Issuer to
receive assets of any of its foreign subsidiaries upon the latter's liquidation
or reorganization (and the consequent right of the Holders of the New Notes to
participate in those assets) will be effectively subordinated to the claims of
that subsidiary's creditors, except to the extent that the Issuer is itself
recognized as a creditor of such subsidiary, in which case the claims of the
Issuer would still be subordinated to any security in the assets of such
subsidiary and any indebtedness of such subsidiary senior to that held by the
Issuer. As of April 5, 1998, the aggregate amount of indebtedness (including
trade payables and capital lease obligations) of the Issuer's foreign
subsidiaries was $1.9 million.
SECURITY
The New Notes will be secured by a first priority security interest,
subject to Permitted Liens, in the Collateral. The Collateral will consist of
substantially all of the Issuer's and its domestic subsidiaries (if any) real
property and personal property, including all plant and equipment at operating
facilities (including its Nampa, Idaho facilities, its headquarters in Campbell,
California and its research and development facilities in Austin, Texas),
subject to Permitted Liens, and excluding, among other things, (i) inventory,
accounts receivable and proceeds of inventory and accounts receivable and (ii)
assets of foreign subsidiaries (collectively, with the Pledged Shares (as
defined below) the "Collateral"). That portion of the Collateral consisting of
interest in real property and improvements thereon to be pledged to the
Collateral Agent will be pledged by means of one or more deeds of trust (the
"Deeds of Trust"). The remaining Collateral will be pledged pursuant to one or
more security agreements, which may be incorporated in the Deeds of Trust (the
"Security Agreements"). The Collateral will also include insurance and
condemnation proceeds from any Event of Loss or Collateral Asset Sale (each as
defined herein). Pursuant to the Indenture, all such proceeds not expended by
the Issuer as provided in the Indenture must be used by the Issuer to make an
offer to repurchase all or a portion of the New Notes. The preceding description
of the Collateral Documents does not purport to be complete and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the Collateral Documents. Copies of the Collateral
Documents are available as set forth under "Available Information." See
"Business -- Properties."
In connection with the closing of the offering of the Old Notes, the Issuer
was required to provide a mortgagee's title insurance policy (the "Mortgagee
Title Policy") in favor of the Collateral Agent, covering the liens on certain
real estate portions of the Collateral (the "Parcels"). Because a survey of the
Parcels may not be completed prior to the closing of the Offering, the Mortgagee
Title Policy may contain an exception to coverage for any title defects that
would be disclosed by a survey (the "Survey Exception"). The Issuer does not
believe that any such defects of a material nature exist.
The Issuer also entered into a pledge agreement (the "Issuer Pledge
Agreement") providing for the pledge by the Issuer to the Trustee, as collateral
agent (in such capacity, the "Collateral Agent") for the
61
<PAGE> 63
Holders of the Notes, of the Capital Stock of all of its directly and indirectly
owned domestic subsidiaries (if any), 65% of the Capital Stock of its foreign
subsidiaries and all Subsidiary Intercompany Notes owed to the Issuer or any of
its domestic subsidiaries (if any). The Issuer's directly owned Subsidiaries
entered into pledge agreements (each, a "Subsidiary Pledge Agreement" and,
together with the Issuer Pledge Agreement, the "Pledge Agreements") providing
for the pledge by each such Subsidiary to the Collateral Agent of all of the
Capital Stock its directly owned domestic subsidiaries (if any) 65% of its
directly owned foreign Subsidiaries and all Subsidiary Intercompany Notes
Indebtedness payable to such Subsidiary by its direct Subsidiaries. Such pledges
will secure the payment and performance when due of all of the Obligations of
the Issuer under the Indenture and the New Notes as provided in the Pledge
Agreements.
So long as no Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, and
subject to certain terms and conditions in the Indenture and the Collateral
Documents, the Issuer will be entitled to use the Collateral in a manner
consistent with normal business practices. Upon the occurrence and during the
continuance of an Event of Default, the Collateral Agent may sell the Collateral
or any part thereof in accordance with the terms of the Collateral Documents.
All funds distributed under the Collateral Documents and received by the
Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Holders of the New Notes shall be
distributed by the Collateral Agent in accordance with the provisions of the
Collateral Documents.
Under the terms of the Collateral Documents, the Holders of the New Notes
will determine the circumstances and manner in which the Collateral shall be
disposed of, including, but not limited to, the determination of whether to
release all or any portion of the Collateral from the Liens created by the
Collateral Documents and whether to foreclose on the Collateral following an
Event of Default. Moreover, upon the full and final payment and performance of
all Obligations of the Issuer under the Indenture and the New Notes, and all
Obligations of the Issuer to the Collateral Agent, the Collateral Documents
shall terminate and the Collateral shall be released. In addition, in the event
that any of the Collateral is sold and the Net Proceeds are applied in
accordance with the terms of the covenant entitled "-- Repurchase at the Option
of Holders -- Asset Sales, Collateral Asset Sales and Events of Loss," the
Collateral Agent shall release the Liens in favor of the Collateral Agent in the
assets sold; provided that the Collateral Agent shall have received from the
Issuer an Officers' Certificate that such Net Proceeds have been or will be so
applied.
The Collateral Documents and the Indenture provide that the Net Proceeds of
all Collateral Asset Sales shall be promptly and without any commingling
deposited with the Collateral Agent subject to a charge in favor of the
Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Holders until applied as permitted under
the covenant described under "-- Repurchase at the Option of Holders -- Asset
Sales, Collateral Asset Sales and Events of Loss." Amounts so paid to the
Collateral Agent shall be invested or released in accordance with the provisions
of the Indenture and the Collateral Documents.
No appraisals of any of the Collateral have been prepared by or on behalf
of the Issuer in connection with the sale of the New Notes. The value of the
Collateral at any time will depend on market and other economic conditions,
including the availability of suitable buyers for the Collateral. See "Risk
Factors -- Risk of Not Realizing Collateral Value."
The release of any Collateral from the terms of the Collateral Documents
pursuant to the terms thereof will not be deemed to impair the security under
the Indenture in contravention of the provisions thereof and of the Collateral
Documents if and to the extent the Collateral is released pursuant to the terms
of the Indenture and the Collateral Documents. To the extent applicable, the
Issuer shall comply with Section 314(d) of the Trust Indenture Act. The
Subsidiary Pledge Agreements limit the proceeds from a sale of pledged
Collateral that can be distributed to Holders of New Notes to the maximum
distribution that would not be considered to be a fraudulent conveyance. As a
result, the Holders of New Notes may not recover the full value of the
Collateral pledged pursuant to the Subsidiary Pledge Agreement.
CERTAIN BANKRUPTCY LIMITATIONS
The right of the Collateral Agent to repossess and dispose of the
Collateral upon the occurrence of an Event of Default is likely to be impaired
by applicable bankruptcy law if a bankruptcy proceeding were to be commenced by
or against the Issuer prior to or possibly even after the Collateral Agent has
repossessed and disposed of the Collateral. Under applicable federal bankruptcy
laws, secured creditors are prohibited from repossessing their
62
<PAGE> 64
security from a debtor in a bankruptcy case, or from disposing of security
repossessed from such a debtor, without bankruptcy court approval. Moreover,
applicable federal bankruptcy laws generally permit the debtor to continue to
retain and to use collateral even though the debtor is in default under the
applicable debt instruments; provided generally that the secured creditor is
given "adequate protection." The meaning of the term "adequate protection" may
vary according to circumstances, but it is intended in general to protect the
value of the secured creditor's interest in the collateral and may include cash
payments or the granting of additional security, if and at such times as the
court in its discretion determines, for any diminution in the value of the
collateral as a result of the stay of repossession or disposition or any use of
the collateral by the debtor during the pendency of the bankruptcy case. In view
of the lack of a precise definition of the term "adequate protection" and the
broad discretionary powers of a bankruptcy court, it is impossible to predict if
payments under the New Notes would be made following commencement of and during
a bankruptcy case, whether or when the Collateral Agent could repossess or
dispose of the Collateral or whether or to what extent Holders of the New Notes
would be compensated for any delay in payment or loss of value of the Collateral
through the requirement of "adequate protection." Furthermore, in the event the
bankruptcy court determines the value of the Collateral is not sufficient to
repay all amounts due on the New Notes, the Holders of the New Notes would hold
"undersecured claims." Applicable federal bankruptcy laws do not permit the
payment and/or accrual of interest, costs and attorneys' fees for "undersecured
claims" during the debtor's bankruptcy case.
PRINCIPAL, MATURITY AND INTEREST
New Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $280.0 million will be issued
in the Exchange Offer. The New Notes will mature on March 1, 2005. Interest on
the New Notes will accrue at the rate of 9 1/2% per annum and will be payable
semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1, commencing on September 1,
1998, to Holders of record on the immediately preceding February 15 and August
15, respectively. Interest on the New Notes will accrue from the most recent
date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the
date of original issuance. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day
year comprised of twelve 30-day months. Principal, premium and Liquidated
Damages, if any, and interest on the New Notes will be payable at the office or
agency of the Issuer maintained for such purpose within the City and State of
New York or, at the option of the Issuer, payment of interest may be made by
check mailed to the Holders of the New Notes at their respective addresses set
forth in the register of Holders of Notes; provided that all payments of
principal, premium and interest with respect to New Notes represented by one or
more permanent global Notes (the "Global Notes") will be required to be made by
wire transfer of immediately available funds to the account of DTC or any
successor thereto. Until otherwise designated by the Issuer, the Issuer's office
or agency in New York will be the office of the Trustee maintained for such
purpose. The New Notes will be issued in denominations of $1,000 and integral
multiples thereof.
GUARANTEES
The Issuer's payment obligations under the New Notes will be jointly and
severally guaranteed (the "Subsidiary Guarantees") on a senior basis by the
Guarantors. The obligations of each Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guarantee
will be limited so as not to constitute a fraudulent conveyance under applicable
law. See, however, "Risk Factors -- Fraudulent Conveyances."
The Indenture provides that no Guarantor may consolidate with or merge with
or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the surviving Person) another
corporation, Person or entity whether or not affiliated with such Guarantor
unless (i) subject to the provisions of the following paragraph, the Person
formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than such
Guarantor) assumes all the obligations of such Guarantor, pursuant to a
supplemental indenture in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the
Trustee, under the Indenture and the Subsidiary Guarantees; and (ii) immediately
after giving effect to such transaction, no Default or Event of Default exists.
The Indenture provides that in the event of a sale or other disposition of
all of the assets of any Guarantor in accordance with the terms of the
Indenture, by way of merger, consolidation or otherwise, or a sale or other
disposition of all of the capital stock of any Guarantor, then such Guarantor
(in the event of a sale or other disposition, by way of such a merger,
consolidation or otherwise, of all of the capital stock of such Guarantor)
63
<PAGE> 65
or the corporation acquiring the property (in the event of a sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of such Guarantor) will be
released and relieved of any obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee.
In July 1998, Zilog merged its two domestic subsidiaries, Zilog Europe and
Zilog TOA Company, with and into Zilog. Prior to such merger, Zilog formed a
foreign subsidiary and transferred certain assets of Zilog Europe to the new
subsidiary. As a result of the merger, Zilog Europe and Zilog TOA Company ceased
to be Guarantors (as defined herein) of the Issuer's payment obligations under
the Notes. In accordance with the terms of the Issuer Pledge Agreement (as
defined herein), Zilog will pledge 65% of the stock of such foreign subsidiary
to partially secure the payment and performance of the obligations of Zilog
under the Indenture and the New Notes as provided in the Pledge Agreements (as
defined herein).
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
Except as otherwise described below, the New Notes will not be redeemable
at the Issuer's option prior to March 1, 2002. Thereafter, the New Notes will be
subject to redemption at any time at the option of the Issuer, in whole or in
part, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days' notice, at the redemption
prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus
accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages thereon, if any, to the
applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning
on March 1 of the years indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR PERCENTAGE
---- ----------
<S> <C>
2002...................................................... 104.750%
2003...................................................... 102.375
2004 and thereafter....................................... 100.000
</TABLE>
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time and from time to time on or
prior to March 1, 2001, the Issuer may (but shall not have the obligation to)
redeem up to an aggregate of 35% of the aggregate principal amount of New Notes
issued under the Indenture at a redemption price equal to 109.50% of the
principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated
Damages thereon, if any, to the redemption date, with all or a portion of the
net cash proceeds of one or more Public Equity Offerings; provided that at least
$100 million in aggregate principal amount of New Notes remain outstanding (and
held by Persons other than the Issuer and its Subsidiaries) immediately after
the occurrence of such redemption; and provided further, that such redemption
shall occur within 90 days of the date of the closing of such Public Equity
Offering.
MANDATORY REDEMPTION
Except as set forth below under "-- Repurchase at the Option of Holders,"
the Issuer is not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments
with respect to the New Notes.
REPURCHASE AT THE OPTION OF HOLDERS
Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, each Holder
of New Notes will have the right to require the Issuer to repurchase all or any
part (equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof) of such Holder's New
Notes pursuant to the offer described below (the "Change of Control Offer") at
an offer price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof
plus accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages thereon, if any, to the
date of purchase (the "Change of Control Payment"). Within 30 days following any
Change of Control, the Issuer will mail a notice to each Holder describing the
transaction or transactions that constitute the Change of Control and offering
to repurchase New Notes on the date specified in such notice, which date shall
be no earlier than 30 days (or such shorter time period as may be permitted
under applicable laws, rules and regulations) and no later than 60 days from the
date such notice is mailed (the "Change of Control Payment Date"), pursuant to
the procedures required by the Indenture and described in such notice. The
Issuer will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act
and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws
and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the New
Notes as a result of a Change of Control. To the extent that the provisions of
any securities laws or regulations conflict with the provisions of the Indenture
relating to such Change of Control Offer, the Issuer will comply with the
applicable securities laws and regulations and shall not be deemed to have
breached its obligations described in the Indenture by virtue thereof.
64
<PAGE> 66
On the Change of Control Payment Date, the Issuer will, to the extent
lawful, (1) accept for payment all New Notes or portions thereof properly
tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer, (2) deposit with the Paying
Agent an amount equal to the Change of Control Payment in respect of all New
Notes or portions thereof so tendered and (3) deliver or cause to be delivered
to the Trustee the New Notes so accepted together with an Officers' Certificate
stating the aggregate principal amount of New Notes or portions thereof being
purchased by the Issuer. The Paying Agent will promptly mail to each Holder of
New Notes so tendered the Change of Control Payment for such New Notes, and the
Trustee will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to be transferred by book
entry) to each tendering Holder a new Note equal in principal amount to any
unpurchased portion of the New Notes surrendered, if any; provided that each
such new Note will be in a principal amount of $1,000 or an integral multiple
thereof. The Issuer will publicly announce the results of the Change of Control
Offer on or as soon as practicable after the Change of Control Payment Date.
The Change of Control provisions described above will be applicable whether
or not any other provisions of the Indenture are applicable. Except as described
above with respect to a Change of Control, the Indenture does not contain
provisions that permit the Holders of the New Notes to require that the Issuer
repurchase or redeem the New Notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization
or similar transaction.
Future agreements governing indebtedness may prohibit the Issuer from
purchasing any New Notes and provide that certain change of control events with
respect to the Issuer would constitute a default thereunder. In such case, the
Issuer's failure to purchase tendered New Notes would constitute an Event of
Default under the Indenture which could, in turn, constitute a default under any
such agreement. Finally, the Issuer's ability to pay cash to the Holders of New
Notes upon a repurchase may be limited by the Issuer's then existing financial
resources.
The Issuer will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon a
Change of Control if a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the
manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth
in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the Issuer and
purchases all New Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of
Control Offer.
The definition of Change of Control includes a phrase relating to the sale,
lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of "all or substantially all"
of the assets of the Issuer and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole. Although
there is a developing body of case law interpreting the phrase "substantially
all," there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable
law. Accordingly, the ability of a Holder of New Notes to require the Issuer to
repurchase such New Notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or
other disposition of less than all of the assets of the Issuer and its
Subsidiaries taken as a whole to another Person or group may be uncertain.
Asset Sales, Collateral Asset Sales and Events of Loss. The Indenture
provides that the Issuer will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries
to, consummate an Asset Sale unless (i) the Issuer (or the Subsidiary, as the
case may be) receives consideration at the time of such Asset Sale at least
equal to the fair market value (evidenced by a resolution of the Board of
Directors set forth in an Officers' Certificate delivered to the Trustee) of the
assets or Equity Interests issued or sold or otherwise disposed of and (ii) at
least 75% of the consideration therefor received by the Issuer or such
Subsidiary is in the form of (A) cash or Cash Equivalents or (B) Qualified
Proceeds, provided that the aggregate fair market value of Qualified Proceeds
(other than cash or Cash Equivalents), which may be received in consideration
for asset sales pursuant to this clause (ii)(B) shall not exceed $5.0 million
since the Issue Date; provided further that the amount of (x) any liabilities
(as shown on the Issuer's or such Subsidiary's most recent balance sheet) of the
Issuer or any Subsidiary (other than contingent liabilities and liabilities that
are by their terms subordinated to the New Notes or any guarantee thereof) that
are assumed by the transferee of any such assets pursuant to a customary
novation agreement that releases the Issuer or such Subsidiary from further
liability and (y) any securities, notes or other obligations received by the
Issuer or any such Subsidiary from such transferee that are converted by the
Issuer or such Subsidiary into cash (to the extent of the cash received) within
90 days, shall be deemed to be cash for purposes of this provision.
Within 360 days after the receipt of any Net Proceeds from an Asset Sale,
the Issuer or any Subsidiary may apply such Net Proceeds to the acquisition of a
controlling interest in another business, the making of a
65
<PAGE> 67
capital expenditure or the acquisition of other property or assets, in each case
which is used or useable in the business of the Issuer or its Subsidiaries on
the Issue Date or businesses reasonably related thereto. Pending the final
application of any such Net Proceeds, the Issuer or such Subsidiary may
temporarily reduce amounts available under revolving credit facilities or invest
such Net Proceeds in any manner that is not prohibited by the Indenture. Any Net
Proceeds from Asset Sales that are not applied or invested as provided in the
first sentence of this paragraph will be deemed to constitute "Excess Proceeds."
When the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds $7.5 million, the Issuer
will be required to make an offer to all Holders of New Notes (an "Asset Sale
Offer") to purchase the maximum principal amount of New Notes that may be
purchased out of the Excess Proceeds, at an offer price in cash in an amount
equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest
and Liquidated Damages thereon, if any, to the date of purchase, in accordance
with the procedures set forth in the Indenture. To the extent that the aggregate
amount of New Notes tendered pursuant to an Asset Sale Offer is less than the
Excess Proceeds, the Issuer or its Subsidiaries may use any remaining Excess
Proceeds for general corporate purposes. If the aggregate principal amount of
New Notes surrendered by Holders thereof exceeds the amount of Excess Proceeds,
the Trustee shall select the New Notes to be purchased on a pro rata basis. Upon
completion of such Asset Sale Offer, the amount of Excess Proceeds shall be
reset at zero.
The Indenture provides that the Issuer will not, and will not permit any of
its Subsidiaries to, engage in a Collateral Asset Sale unless (a) such
Collateral Asset Sale involves the Collateral in its entirety, or, if such
Collateral Asset Sale involves less than all of the Collateral (a "Partial
Collateral Asset Sale"), such Partial Collateral Asset Sale involves a single
Collateral Asset Sale with a fair market value at the time of consummation of
such Collateral Asset Sale not exceeding $50.0 million and is not part of a
series of Collateral Asset Sales in any eighteen month period with an aggregate
value (measured as of the time of consummation of such sales) exceeding $50.0
million in the aggregate; (b) the Issuer receives consideration in respect of
and concurrently with such Collateral Asset Sale at least equal to the fair
market value of such Collateral; (c) with respect to each such Collateral Asset
Sale, the Issuer delivers an Officers' Certificate to the Trustee dated no more
than 15 days prior to the date of consummation of the relevant Collateral Asset
Sale, certifying that (i) such sale complies with clauses (a) and (b) above and
(ii) if the fair market value of the Collateral being sold exceeds $10.0
million, the fair market value of such Collateral was determined in good faith
by the Board of Directors of the Issuer (whose determination, if the Collateral
Asset Sale involves Collateral with a fair market value in excess of $50.0
million, was based on the opinion of a nationally recognized qualified
independent appraiser prepared contemporaneously with such Collateral Asset Sale
and which opinion, in such case, will be attached to the Officers' Certificate)
as evidenced by copies of a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Issuer
adopted in respect of and concurrently with such Collateral Asset Sale; (d) 100%
of such consideration is in cash or Cash Equivalents; and (e) the Net Proceeds
therefrom shall be paid directly by the purchaser thereof to the Collateral
Agent, pursuant to the applicable security document, as additional Collateral.
In the case of a Partial Collateral Asset Sale, the Issuer, within 360 days from
the date of consummation of a Partial Collateral Asset Sale, may apply all of
the Net Proceeds therefrom to purchase or otherwise invest in Replacement
Collateral. Any such Net Proceeds not so applied shall constitute "Excess
Proceeds" and shall be applied to make an Asset Sale Offer, in accordance with
the terms of the second paragraph of this covenant. In the case of a Collateral
Asset Sale other than a Partial Collateral Asset Sale all of the Net Proceeds
therefrom shall constitute "Excess Proceeds" and shall be applied to make an
Asset Sale Offer in accordance with the terms described above.
The Indenture provides that if the Issuer suffers an Event of Loss, (a) the
Net Proceeds therefrom shall be paid directly by the party providing such Net
Proceeds to the Collateral Agent, pursuant to the applicable Collateral
Document, as additional Collateral and (b) the Issuer shall take such actions,
at its sole expense, as may be required to ensure that the Collateral Agent,
pursuant to the applicable security document, has from the date of such deposit
a first ranking Lien (subject to Permitted Liens) on such Net Proceeds pursuant
to the terms of the applicable Collateral Document. As any portion or all of the
Net Proceeds from any such Event of Loss are received by the Collateral Agent,
the Issuer may apply all of such amount or amounts, as received, together with
all interest earned thereon, individually or in combination, (i) to purchase or
otherwise invest in Replacement Collateral or (ii) to restore the relevant
Collateral. In the event that the Issuer elects to restore the relevant
Collateral pursuant to the foregoing clause (ii), within six months of receipt
of such Net Proceeds from an Event of Loss, the Issuer shall (x) give the
Trustee irrevocable written notice of such election and (y) enter into a binding
commitment to restore such Collateral, a copy of which shall be supplied
66
<PAGE> 68
to the Trustee, and shall have 12 months (and up to an additional 6 months under
certain circumstances) from the date of such binding commitment to complete such
restoration, which shall be carried out with due diligence. Any such Net
Proceeds not so applied shall constitute "Excess Proceeds" and shall be applied
to make an Asset Sale Offer in accordance with the terms of the second paragraph
of this covenant.
Under the terms of the Indenture, in the event that the Issuer decides
pursuant to the foregoing provisions to apply any portion of the Net Proceeds
from a Collateral Asset Sale or an Event of Loss to purchase or otherwise invest
in Replacement Collateral, (i) the Issuer shall deliver an Officers' Certificate
to the Trustee dated no more than 30 days prior to the date of consummation of
the relevant investment in Replacement Collateral, certifying that the purchase
price for the amount of the investment in Replacement Collateral does not exceed
the fair market value of such Replacement Collateral and, if the fair market
value of such Replacement Collateral exceeds $10.0 million, certifying that the
fair market value of such Replacement Collateral was determined in good faith by
the Board of Directors of the Issuer and, in the event the fair market value of
such Replacement Collateral exceeds $50.0 million, was based on the opinion of a
nationally recognized qualified independent appraiser attached to the Officers'
Certificate, as evidenced by copies of a resolution of the Board of Directors of
the Issuer adopted in respect of and concurrently with the investment in such
Replacement Collateral; (ii) the Trustee will instruct the Collateral Agent to
release such certified purchase price to the Issuer, free of the Lien of the
Collateral Documents; and (iii) the Issuer shall take such actions, at its sole
expense, as shall be required to permit the Collateral Agent, pursuant to the
applicable Collateral Document, to release such Net Proceeds, together with any
interest thereon, from the Lien of the applicable Collateral Document and to
ensure that the Collateral Agent has, from the date of such purchase or
investment, a first ranking Lien (subject to Permitted Liens on such Collateral)
on such Replacement Collateral under the applicable Collateral Document.
SELECTION AND NOTICE
If less than all of the New Notes are to be redeemed or repurchased in an
offer to purchase at any time, selection of New Notes for redemption or
repurchase will be made by the Trustee in compliance with the requirements of
the principal national securities exchange, if any, on which the New Notes are
listed, or, if the New Notes are not so listed, on a pro rata basis, by lot or
by such other method as the Trustee deems fair and appropriate; provided that no
New Notes of $1,000 or less shall be redeemed or repurchased in part. Notices of
redemption may not be conditional. Notices of redemption or repurchase shall be
mailed by first class mail at least 30 but not more than 60 days before the
redemption date or repurchase date to each Holder of New Notes to be redeemed or
repurchased at its registered address. If any Note is to be redeemed or
repurchased in part only, the notice of redemption or repurchase that relates to
such Note shall state the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed
or repurchased. A new Note in principal amount equal to the unredeemed or
unrepurchased portion thereof will be issued in the name of the Holder thereof
upon cancellation of the original Note. On and after the redemption or
repurchase date, interest will cease to accrue on New Notes or portions of them
called for redemption or repurchase.
CERTAIN COVENANTS
Restricted Payments. The Indenture provides that the Issuer will not, and
will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly: (i) declare
or pay any dividend or make any other payment or distribution on account of the
Issuer's or any of its Subsidiaries' Equity Interests (including, without
limitation, any such dividend, distribution or other payment in connection with
any merger or consolidation involving the Issuer or any Subsidiary) or to the
direct or indirect holders of the Issuer's or any of its Subsidiaries' Equity
Interests in their capacity as such (other than dividends or distributions
payable in Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer or
dividends or distributions payable to the Issuer or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary
of the Issuer); (ii) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire or retire for value
(including, without limitation, any such purchase, redemption, acquisition or
retirement for value in connection with any merger or consolidation involving
the Issuer) any Equity Interests of the Issuer (other than any such Equity
Interests owned by the Issuer or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer);
(iii) make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem, defease or
otherwise acquire or retire for value any Indebtedness that is subordinated to
the New Notes, except a payment of interest or a payment of principal at Stated
Maturity for such payment; or (iv) make any Restricted Investment (all such
payments
67
<PAGE> 69
and other actions set forth in clauses (i) through (iv) above being collectively
referred to as "Restricted Payments"), unless, at the time of and immediately
after giving effect to such Restricted Payment:
(a) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof; and
(b) the Issuer would, at the time of such Restricted Payment and after
giving pro forma effect thereto, have been permitted to incur at least
$1.00 of additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described below
under caption "-- Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred
Stock"; and
(c) such Restricted Payment, together with the aggregate amount of all
other Restricted Payments made by the Issuer and its Subsidiaries after the
date of the Indenture (excluding Restricted Payments permitted by clauses
(ii), (iii), (iv) and (viii) of the next succeeding paragraph), is less
than the sum (without duplication) of (i) 50% of the Consolidated Net
Income of the Issuer for the period (taken as one accounting period) from
the beginning of the first fiscal quarter commencing after the date of the
Indenture to the end of the Issuer's most recently ended fiscal quarter for
which internal financial statements are available at the time of such
Restricted Payment (or, if such Consolidated Net Income for such period is
a deficit, less 100% of such deficit), plus (ii) 100% of the aggregate
Qualified Proceeds received by the Issuer from contributions to capital or
the issue or sale since the date of the Indenture of Equity Interests of
the Issuer (other than Disqualified Stock) or of Disqualified Stock or debt
securities of the Issuer that have been converted into such Equity
Interests (other than Equity Interests (or Disqualified Stock or
convertible debt securities) sold to a Subsidiary of the Issuer and other
than Disqualified Stock or convertible debt securities that have been
converted into Disqualified Stock), plus (iii) to the extent that any
Restricted Investment that was made after the date of the Indenture is sold
for Qualified Proceeds or otherwise liquidated or repaid the lesser of (A)
the Qualified Proceeds with respect to such Restricted Investment (less the
cost of disposition, if any) and (B) the initial amount of such Restricted
Investment, plus (iv) $5.0 million.
The foregoing provisions will not prohibit (i) the payment of any dividend
within 60 days after the date of declaration thereof, if at said date of
declaration such payment would have complied with the provisions of the
Indenture; (ii) the redemption, repurchase, retirement, defeasance or other
acquisition of any subordinated Indebtedness or Equity Interests of the Issuer
or any Guarantor in exchange for, or out of the net cash proceeds of the
substantially concurrent sale (other than to a Subsidiary of the Issuer) of,
other Equity Interests of the Issuer (other than any Disqualified Stock);
provided that the amount of any such net cash proceeds that are utilized for any
such redemption, repurchase, retirement, defeasance or other acquisition shall
be excluded from clause (c) (ii) of the preceding paragraph; (iii) the
defeasance, redemption, repurchase, retirement or other acquisition of
subordinated Indebtedness in exchange for, or with the net cash proceeds from,
an incurrence of Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness; (iv) the payment of any
dividend (or the making of any similar distribution or redemption) by a
Subsidiary of the Issuer to the holders of its common Equity Interests on a pro
rata basis; (v) the repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement
for value of any Equity Interests of the Issuer or any Subsidiary of the Issuer
held by any member of the Issuer's (or any of its Subsidiaries') management,
employees or consultants pursuant to any management, employee or consultant
equity subscription agreement or stock option agreement in effect as of the date
of the Indenture; provided that (x) the aggregate price paid for all such
repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests shall not exceed the
sum of (A) $5.0 million and (B) the aggregate cash proceeds received by the
Issuer from any reissuance of Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock)
by the Issuer to members of management of the Issuer and its Subsidiaries
(provided that the cash proceeds referred to in this clause (B) shall be
excluded from clause (c)(ii) of the preceding paragraph) and (y) no Default or
Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing immediately after such
transaction; (vi) cash payments in lieu of fractional shares issuable as
dividends on preferred securities of the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries;
provided that such cash payments shall not exceed $20,000 in the aggregate in
any twelve-month period and no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred
and be continuing immediately after such transaction; (vii) the declaration and
payment of dividends to holders of any class or series of Disqualified Stock of
the Issuer or a Guarantor issued after the date of the Indenture in accordance
with the covenant described below under the caption "-- Incurrence of
Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock"; provided that no Default or
68
<PAGE> 70
Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing immediately after making
such declaration or payment; and (viii) from and after January 1, 1999 so long
no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, payments by the
Issuer not exceeding $35.0 million in the aggregate since the Issue Date in
respect of the redemption of shares of Preferred Stock outstanding on the Issue
Date (or shares of Preferred Stock issued as dividends thereon) if both before
and after giving effect to any such payment, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for
the Issuer's most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal
financial statements are available immediately preceding the date of such
payment would be at least 2.5 to 1.
The amount of all Restricted Payments (other than cash) shall be the fair
market value on the date of the Restricted Payment of the asset(s) or securities
proposed to be transferred or issued by the Issuer or such Subsidiary, as the
case may be, pursuant to the Restricted Payment. The fair market value of any
non-cash Restricted Payment shall be determined by the Board of Directors whose
resolution with respect thereto shall be delivered to the Trustee, such
determination to be based upon an opinion or appraisal issued by an accounting,
appraisal or investment banking firm of national standing if such fair market
value exceeds $10.0 million. Not later than the date of making any Restricted
Payment, the Issuer shall deliver to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate
stating that such Restricted Payment is permitted and setting forth the basis
upon which the calculations required by the covenant "Restricted Payments" were
computed, together with a copy of any fairness opinion or appraisal required by
the Indenture.
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock. The Indenture
provides that the Issuer will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries
to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise
become directly or indirectly liable, contingently or otherwise, with respect to
(collectively, "incur") any Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt) and that the
Issuer will not issue any Disqualified Stock and will not permit any of its
Subsidiaries to issue any shares of preferred stock; provided, however, that the
Issuer may incur Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt) or issue shares of
Disqualified Stock and the Guarantors may incur Indebtedness or issue shares of
preferred stock if the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the Issuer's most
recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements
are available immediately preceding the date on which such additional
Indebtedness is incurred or such Disqualified Stock or preferred stock is issued
would have been at least 2.0 to 1, determined on a pro forma basis (including a
pro forma application of the net proceeds therefrom), as if the additional
Indebtedness had been incurred, or the Disqualified Stock had been issued, as
the case may be, at the beginning of such four-quarter period.
The provisions of the first paragraph of this covenant will not apply to
the incurrence of any of the following items of Indebtedness (collectively,
"Permitted Debt"):
(i) the incurrence by the Issuer (and the guarantee thereof by the
Guarantors) of Indebtedness under Credit Facilities; provided that the
aggregate principal amount of all Indebtedness (with letters of credit
being deemed to have a principal amount equal to the maximum potential
liability of the Issuer and the Guarantors thereunder) outstanding under
all Credit Facilities after giving effect to such incurrence, including all
Indebtedness incurred to refund, refinance or replace any Indebtedness
incurred pursuant to this clause (i), does not exceed an amount equal to
$25.0 million;
(ii) the incurrence by the Issuer and its Subsidiaries of the Existing
Indebtedness;
(iii) the incurrence by the Issuer and the Guarantors of Indebtedness
represented by the New Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees;
(iv) the incurrence by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries of
Indebtedness represented by Capital Lease Obligations, mortgage financings
or purchase money obligations, in each case incurred for the purpose of
financing all or any part of the purchase price or cost of construction or
improvement of property, plant or equipment used in the business of the
Issuer or such Subsidiary, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$25.0 million at any time outstanding;
69
<PAGE> 71
(v) the incurrence by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries of
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness in exchange for, or the net proceeds of
which are used to refund, refinance or replace Indebtedness (other than
intercompany Indebtedness) that was permitted by the Indenture to exist or
be incurred;
(vi) the incurrence by the Issuer or any of the Guarantors of
intercompany Indebtedness between or among the Issuer and any of the
Guarantors; provided, however, that (i) if the Issuer is the obligor on
such Indebtedness, such Indebtedness is expressly subordinated to the prior
payment in full in cash of all Obligations with respect to the New Notes
and (ii)(A) any subsequent issuance or transfer of Equity Interests that
results in any such Indebtedness being held by a Person other than the
Issuer or a Guarantor and (B) any sale or other transfer of any such
Indebtedness to a Person that is not either the Issuer or a Guarantor shall
be deemed, in each case, to constitute an incurrence of such Indebtedness
by the Issuer or such Guarantor, as the case may be;
(vii) the incurrence by the Issuer or any of the Guarantors of Hedging
Obligations that are incurred for the purpose of fixing or hedging (i)
interest rate risk with respect to any floating rate Indebtedness that is
permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be outstanding or (ii) the value
of foreign currencies purchased or received by the Issuer in the ordinary
course of business;
(viii) Indebtedness incurred in respect of worker's compensation
claims, self-insurance obligations, performance, surety and similar bonds
and completion guarantees provided by the Issuer in the ordinary course of
business;
(ix) the guarantee by the Issuer or any of the Guarantors of
Indebtedness of the Issuer or a Guarantor that was permitted to be incurred
by another provision of this covenant;
(x) the incurrence by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries of
Acquired Debt in an aggregate principal amount at any time outstanding not
to exceed $5.0 million;
(xi) Indebtedness arising from the honoring by a bank or other
financial institution of a check, draft or similar instrument inadvertently
(except in the case of daylight overdrafts) drawn against insufficient
funds in the ordinary course of business; provided, however, that such
Indebtedness is extinguished within five business days of incurrence;
(xii) the incurrence by the Issuer or any of the Guarantors of
additional Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount (or accreted
value, as applicable) at any time outstanding, including all Indebtedness
incurred to refund, refinance or replace any Indebtedness incurred pursuant
to this clause (xii), not to exceed $25.0 million; and
(xiii) Indebtedness arising from guarantees of Indebtedness of the
Issuer or any Subsidiary or the agreements of the Issuer or a Subsidiary
providing for indemnification, adjustment of purchase price or similar
obligations, in each case, incurred or assumed in connection with the
disposition of any business, assets or Capital Stock of the Issuer or any
Subsidiary, or other guarantees of Indebtedness incurred by any person
acquiring all or any portion of such business, assets or Capital Stock of
the Issuer or any Subsidiary for the purpose of financing such acquisition,
provided that the maximum aggregate liability in respect of all such
Indebtedness shall at no time exceed the gross proceeds actually received
by the Issuer and its Subsidiaries in connection with such disposition.
For purposes of determining compliance with this covenant, in the event
that an item of Indebtedness meets the criteria of more than one of the
categories of Permitted Debt described in clauses (i) through (xiii) above or is
entitled to be incurred pursuant to the first paragraph of this covenant, the
Issuer shall, in its sole discretion, classify such item of Indebtedness in any
manner that complies with this covenant and such item of Indebtedness will be
treated as having been incurred pursuant to only one of such clauses or pursuant
to the first paragraph hereof. Accrual of interest, the accretion of accreted
value and the payment of interest in the form of additional Indebtedness will
not be deemed to be an incurrence of Indebtedness for purposes of this covenant.
Liens. The Indenture provides that the Issuer will not, and will not permit
any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or
suffer to exist any Lien securing Indebtedness or trade payables
70
<PAGE> 72
on any asset now owned or hereafter acquired, or any income or profits therefrom
or assign or convey any right to receive income therefrom for purposes of
security, except Permitted Liens.
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Subsidiaries. The
Indenture provides that the Issuer will not, and will not permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create or otherwise cause or suffer to
exist or become effective any encumbrance or restriction on the ability of any
Subsidiary to (i)(a) pay dividends or make any other distributions to the Issuer
or any of its Subsidiaries (1) on its Capital Stock or (2) with respect to any
other interest or participation in, or measured by, its profits, or (b) pay any
indebtedness owed to the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) make loans or
advances to the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries or (iii) transfer any of its
properties or assets to the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries, except for such
encumbrances or restrictions existing under or by reason of (a) Existing
Indebtedness as in effect on the date of the Indenture, (b) the Revolving Credit
Facility as in effect as of the date of the Indenture and any amendments,
modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings,
replacements or refinancings thereof, provided that such amendments,
modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings,
replacement or refinancings are no more restrictive with respect to such
dividend and other payment restrictions than those contained in the Revolving
Credit Facility as in effect on the date of the Indenture, (c) the Indenture,
the New Notes and the Collateral Documents, (d) applicable law, rule, regulation
or order, (e) any agreement or instrument governing Indebtedness or Capital
Stock of a Person acquired by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries as in effect
at the time of such acquisition (except to the extent such agreement or
instrument was entered into in connection with or in contemplation of such
acquisition), which encumbrance or restriction is not applicable to any Person,
or the properties or assets of any Person, other than the Person and its
Subsidiaries, or the property or assets of the Person and its Subsidiaries, so
acquired, provided that, in the case of Indebtedness, such Indebtedness was
permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be incurred, (f) by reason of
customary non-assignment provisions in leases, licenses, encumbrances, contracts
or similar assets entered into or acquired in the ordinary course of business
and consistent with past practices, (g) purchase money obligations for property
acquired in the ordinary course of business that impose restrictions of the
nature described in clause (iii) above on the property so acquired, (h)
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness, provided that the restrictions contained in
the agreements governing such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness are no more
restrictive than those contained in the agreements governing the Indebtedness
being refinanced or (i) contracts for the sale of assets containing customary
restrictions with respect to a Subsidiary pursuant to an agreement that has been
entered into for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the
Capital Stock or assets of such Subsidiary.
Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets. The Indenture provides that the
Issuer may not consolidate or merge with or into (whether or not the Issuer is
the surviving corporation), or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or
otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its properties or assets in one
or more related transactions, to another Person unless (i) the Issuer is the
surviving corporation or the Person formed by or surviving any such
consolidation or merger (if other than the Issuer) or to which such sale,
assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance or other disposition shall have been
made is a corporation or limited liability company organized or existing under
the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
(ii) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if
other than the Issuer) or the Person to which such sale, assignment, transfer,
lease, conveyance or other disposition shall have been made assumes all the
obligations of the Issuer under the New Notes, the Indenture and the Collateral
Documents pursuant to a supplemental indenture or other documents or instruments
in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee; (iii) immediately after such
transaction no Default or Event of Default exists under the Indenture or the
Collateral Documents; and (iv) except in the case of a merger of the Issuer with
or into a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer, the Issuer or the Person formed
by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than the Issuer), or
to which such sale, assignment, transfer, lease, conveyance or other disposition
shall have been made will, at the time of such transaction and after giving pro
forma effect thereto as if such transaction had occurred at the beginning of the
applicable four-quarter period, be permitted to incur at least $1.00 of
additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test set
forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption
"-- Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock." The foregoing
clause (iv) will not prohibit (a) a merger between the Issuer and a Person that
owns all of the Capital Stock of the Issuer created for the purpose of
71
<PAGE> 73
holding the Capital Stock of the Issuer, (b) a merger between the Issuer and a
Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer or (c) a merger between the Issuer and an
Affiliate incorporated solely for the purpose of reincorporating the Issuer in
another State of the United States so long as, in the case of each of clause
(a), (b) and (c), the amount of Indebtedness of the Issuer and its Subsidiaries
is not increased thereby.
Transactions with Affiliates. The Indenture provides that the Issuer will
not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, make any payment to or
Investment in, or sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of its
properties or assets to, or purchase any property or assets from, or enter into
or make or amend any contract, agreement, understanding, loan, advance or
guarantee with, or for the benefit of, any Affiliate (each of the foregoing, an
"Affiliate Transaction"), unless (i) such Affiliate Transaction is on terms that
are no less favorable to the Issuer or the relevant Subsidiary than those that
would have been obtained in a comparable transaction by the Issuer or such
Subsidiary with an unrelated Person and (ii) the Issuer delivers to the Trustee
(a) with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate
Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of $1.0 million, a
resolution of the Board of Directors set forth in an Officers' Certificate
certifying that such Affiliate Transaction complies with clause (i) above and
that such Affiliate Transaction has been approved by a majority of the
disinterested members of the Board of Directors and (b) with respect to any
Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate Transactions involving
aggregate consideration in excess of $10.0 million, an opinion as to the
fairness to the Holders of such Affiliate Transaction from a financial point of
view issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking firm of national
standing; provided that (u) payments of fees and expenses (including any such
payments to TPG) in connection with the Recapitalization, (v) contracts,
agreements, understandings or other arrangements existing on the Issue Date, (w)
transactions with suppliers or other purchasers or sales of goods or services,
in each case in the ordinary course of business (including, without limitation,
pursuant to joint venture agreements) and otherwise in accordance with the terms
of the Indenture which are fair to the Issuer, in the good faith determination
of the Board of Directors of the Issuer or the senior management of the Issuer,
and are on terms at least as favorable as might reasonably have been obtained at
such time from an unaffiliated party, (x) any employment agreements, stock
option or other compensation agreements or plans (and the payment of amounts or
the issuance of securities thereunder) and other reasonable fees, compensation,
benefits and indemnities paid or entered into by the Issuer or any of its
Subsidiaries with the officers, directors or employees of the Issuer or its
Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, (y) transactions between or
among the Issuer and/or its Subsidiaries and (z) Restricted Payments (other than
Restricted Investments) that are permitted by the provisions of the Indenture
described above under the caption "-- Restricted Payments," in each case, shall
not be deemed Affiliate Transactions.
Sale and Leaseback Transactions. The Indenture provides that the Issuer
will not, and will not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, enter into any sale
and leaseback transaction with respect to any property or asset of the Issuer or
any of its Subsidiaries; provided that the Issuer may enter into such a sale and
leaseback transaction if (i) the Issuer could have (a) incurred Indebtedness in
an amount equal to the Attributable Debt relating to such sale and leaseback
transaction pursuant to the covenant described above under the caption
"-- Incurrence of Additional Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" and
(b) incurred a Lien to secure such Indebtedness pursuant to the covenant
described above under the caption "-- Liens," (ii) the gross cash proceeds of
such sale and leaseback transaction are at least equal to the fair market value
(as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and set forth in an
Officers' Certificate delivered to the Trustee) of the property that is the
subject of such sale and leaseback transaction and (iii) the transfer of assets
in such sale and leaseback transaction is excluded from the definition of Asset
Sale pursuant to clause (v) or is permitted by, and the Issuer applies the
proceeds of such transaction in compliance with, the covenant described above
under the caption "-- Asset Sales, Collateral Asset Sales and Events of Loss."
Loans to Subsidiaries. The Indenture provides that all loans to
Subsidiaries made by the Issuer from time to time after the date of the
Indenture will be evidenced by unsecured Subsidiary Intercompany New Notes in
favor of the Issuer that will be pledged to the Collateral Agent pursuant to the
Pledge Agreement as Collateral to secure the New Notes. The Indenture will also
provide that all loans by the Issuer to any Subsidiary outstanding on the date
of the Indenture will be evidenced by an unsecured Subsidiary Intercompany Note
that will be pledged to the Collateral Agent pursuant to the Pledge Agreement as
72
<PAGE> 74
Collateral for the New Notes. Each Subsidiary Intercompany Note will be payable
upon demand and will bear interest at a market rate. A form of Subsidiary
Intercompany Note will be attached as an annex to the Indenture. Repayments of
principal with respect to any Subsidiary Intercompany Note will be required to
be pledged to the Collateral Agent pursuant to the Pledge Agreement as
Collateral to secure the New Notes until such amounts are repaid.
Issuances and Sales of Capital Stock of Wholly Owned Subsidiaries. The
Indenture provides that the Issuer (i) will not, and will not permit any Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer to, transfer, convey, sell, lease or otherwise
dispose of any Capital Stock of any Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer to any
Person (other than to the Issuer or to a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer),
unless (a) such transfer, conveyance, sale, lease or other disposition is of all
the Capital Stock of such Wholly Owned Subsidiary and (b) the cash Net Proceeds
from such transfer, conveyance, sale, lease or other disposition are applied in
accordance with the covenant described above under the caption "-- Asset Sales,
Collateral Asset Sales and Events of Loss" and (ii) will not permit any Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer to issue any of its Equity Interests (other than,
if necessary, shares of its Capital Stock constituting directors' qualifying
shares) to any Person other than to the Issuer or to a Wholly Owned Subsidiary.
Payments for Consent. The Indenture provides that neither the Issuer nor
any of its Subsidiaries will, directly or indirectly, pay or cause to be paid
any consideration, whether by way of interest, fee or otherwise, to any Holder
of any New Notes for or as an inducement to any consent, waiver or amendment of
any of the terms or provisions of the Indenture or the New Notes unless such
consideration is offered to be paid or is paid to all Holders of the New Notes
that consent, waive or agree to amend in the time frame set forth in the
solicitation documents relating to such consent, waiver or agreement.
Guarantees of Certain Indebtedness. The Indenture provides that (i) the
Issuer will not permit any of its Subsidiaries that is not a Guarantor to incur,
guarantee or secure through the granting of Liens the payment of any
Indebtedness and (ii) the Issuer will not and will not permit any of its
Subsidiaries to pledge any intercompany notes representing obligations of any of
its Subsidiaries, to secure the payment of any Indebtedness, in each case unless
such Subsidiary, the Issuer and the Trustee execute and deliver a supplemental
indenture evidencing such Subsidiary's Guarantee (providing for the
unconditional guarantee by such Subsidiary, on a senior basis, of the New
Notes).
Reports. The Indenture provides that, whether or not required by the rules
and regulations of the Commission, so long as any New Notes are outstanding, the
Issuer will furnish to the Holders of New Notes (i) all quarterly and annual
financial information that would be required to be contained in a filing with
the Commission on Forms 10-Q and 10-K if the Issuer were required to file such
Forms, including a "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" that describes the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer and its consolidated Subsidiaries and, with respect to
the annual information only, a report thereon by the Issuer's certified
independent accountants and (ii) all current reports that would be required to
be filed with the Commission on Form 8-K if the Issuer were required to file
such reports, in each case within the time periods set forth in the Commission's
rules and regulations. In addition, whether or not required by the rules and
regulations of the Commission, following the consummation of the Exchange Offer
contemplated by the Registration Rights Agreement, the Issuer will file a copy
of all such information and reports with the Commission for public availability
within the time periods set forth in the Commission's rules and regulations
(unless the Commission will not accept such a filing) and make such information
available to securities analysts and prospective investors upon request. In
addition, the Issuer and the Guarantors have agreed that, for so long as any New
Notes remain outstanding, they will furnish to the Holders and to securities
analysts and prospective investors, upon their request, the information required
to be delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act.
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
The Indenture provides that each of the following constitutes an Event of
Default: (i) default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on, or
Liquidated Damages with respect to, the New Notes; (ii) default in payment when
due of the principal of or premium, if any, on the New Notes; (iii) failure by
the Issuer or any
73
<PAGE> 75
of its Subsidiaries for 30 days after notice by the Trustee or by the Holders of
at least 25% of New Notes then outstanding to comply with any of its other
agreements in the Indenture or the New Notes; (iv) default under any mortgage,
indenture or instrument under which there may be issued or by which there may be
secured or evidenced any Indebtedness for money borrowed by the Issuer or any of
its Subsidiaries (or the payment of which is guaranteed by the Issuer or any of
its Subsidiaries) whether such Indebtedness or guarantee now exists, or is
created after the date of the Indenture, which default (a) is caused by a
failure to pay principal of or premium, if any, or interest on such Indebtedness
after giving effect to any grace period provided in such Indebtedness on the
date of such default (a "Payment Default") or (b) results in the acceleration of
such Indebtedness prior to its stated maturity and, in each case, the principal
amount of any such Indebtedness, together with the principal amount of any other
such Indebtedness under which there has been a Payment Default or the maturity
of which has been so accelerated, aggregates $15.0 million or more; (v) failure
by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries to pay final judgments (net of any
amounts with respect to which a reputable and creditworthy insurance company has
acknowledged liability in writing) aggregating in excess of $15.0 million, which
judgments are not paid, discharged or stayed for a period of 60 days; (vi)
except as permitted by the Indenture, any Subsidiary Guarantee shall be held in
any judicial proceeding to be unenforceable or invalid or shall cease for any
reason to be in full force and effect or any Guarantor, or any Person acting on
behalf of any Guarantor, shall deny or disaffirm its obligations under its
Subsidiary Guarantee; (vii) material breach by the Issuer of any representation
or warranty set forth in the Collateral Documents, or a material default by the
Issuer in the performance of any covenant set forth in the Collateral Documents,
or repudiation by the Issuer of its obligations under the Collateral Documents
or the unenforceability of the Collateral Documents against the Issuer for any
reason, which in any such case materially impairs the Trustee's lien on or the
value of the Collateral, taken as a whole; and (viii) certain events of
bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the Issuer or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries.
If any Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or the
Holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding New Notes
may declare all the New Notes to be due and payable immediately. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, in the case of an Event of Default arising from certain events of
bankruptcy or insolvency, with respect to the Issuer or any Guarantor
constituting a Significant Subsidiary, all outstanding New Notes will become due
and payable without further action or notice. Holders of the New Notes may not
enforce the Indenture or the New Notes except as provided in the Indenture.
Subject to certain limitations, Holders of a majority in principal amount of the
then outstanding New Notes may direct the Trustee in its exercise of any trust
or power. The Trustee may withhold from Holders of the New Notes notice of any
continuing Default or Event of Default (except a Default or Event of Default
relating to the payment of principal or interest) if it determines that
withholding notice is in their interest. In the event of a declaration of
acceleration of the New Notes because an Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing as a result of the acceleration of any Indebtedness described in
clause (iv) of the preceding paragraph, the declaration of acceleration of the
New Notes shall be automatically annulled if the holders of any Indebtedness
described in clause (iv) of the preceding paragraph have rescinded the
declaration of acceleration in respect of such Indebtedness within 30 days of
the date of such declaration and if (a) the annulment of the acceleration of
such New Notes would not conflict with any judgment or decree of a court of
competent jurisdiction and (b) all existing Events of Default, except nonpayment
of principal or interest on the New Notes that became due solely because of the
acceleration of the New Notes, have been cured or waived.
In the case of any Event of Default occurring by reason of any willful
action (or inaction) taken (or not taken) by or on behalf of the Issuer with the
intention of avoiding payment of the premium that the Issuer would have had to
pay if the Issuer then had elected to redeem the New Notes pursuant to the
optional redemption provisions of the Indenture, an equivalent premium shall
also become and be immediately due and payable to the extent permitted by law
upon the acceleration of the New Notes. If an Event of Default occurs prior to
March 1, 2002, by reason of any willful action (or inaction) taken (or not
taken) by or on behalf of the Issuer with the intention of avoiding the
prohibition on redemption of the New Notes prior to March 1, 2002, then the
premium specified in the Indenture shall also become immediately due and payable
to the extent permitted by law upon the acceleration of the New Notes.
74
<PAGE> 76
The Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the New Notes
then outstanding by notice to the Trustee may on behalf of the Holders of all of
the New Notes waive any existing Default or Event of Default and its
consequences under the Indenture except a continuing Default or Event of Default
in the payment of interest on, or the principal of, the New Notes.
The Issuer is required to deliver to the Trustee annually a statement
regarding compliance with the Indenture and the Collateral Documents, and the
Issuer is required upon becoming aware of any Default or Event of Default, to
deliver to the Trustee a statement specifying such Default or Event of Default.
NO PERSONAL LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND STOCKHOLDERS
No director, officer, employee, incorporator or stockholder of the Issuer,
as such, shall have any liability for any obligations of the Issuer under the
New Notes, the Collateral Documents, the Indenture or the Subsidiary Guarantees
or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or
their creation. Each Holder of New Notes by accepting a Note waives and releases
all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for
issuance of the New Notes. Such waiver may not be effective to waive liabilities
under the federal securities laws and it is the view of the Commission that such
a waiver is against public policy.
LEGAL DEFEASANCE AND COVENANT DEFEASANCE
The Issuer may, at its option and at any time, elect to have all of its
obligations and the obligations of the Guarantors discharged with respect to the
outstanding New Notes ("Legal Defeasance") except for (i) the rights of Holders
of outstanding New Notes to receive payments in respect of the principal of,
premium, if any, and interest and Liquidated Damages on such New Notes when such
payments are due from the trust referred to below, (ii) the Issuer's obligations
with respect to the New Notes concerning issuing temporary New Notes,
registration of New Notes, mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen New Notes and
the maintenance of an office or agency for payment and money for security
payments held in trust, (iii) the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities
of the Trustee, and the Issuer's obligations in connection therewith and (iv)
the Legal Defeasance provisions of the Indenture. In addition, the Issuer may,
at its option and at any time, elect to have the obligations of the Issuer
released with respect to certain covenants that are described in the Indenture
("Covenant Defeasance") and thereafter any omission to comply with such
obligations shall not constitute a Default or Event of Default with respect to
the New Notes. In the event Covenant Defeasance occurs, certain events (not
including non-payment, bankruptcy, receivership, rehabilitation and insolvency
events) described under "Events of Default" will no longer constitute an Event
of Default with respect to the New Notes.
In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance, (i)
the Issuer must irrevocably deposit with the Trustee, in trust, for the benefit
of the Holders of the New Notes, cash in U.S. dollars, non-callable Government
Securities, or a combination thereof, in such amounts as will be sufficient, in
the opinion of a nationally recognized firm of independent public accountants,
to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest and Liquidated Damages on
the outstanding New Notes on the stated maturity or on the applicable redemption
date, as the case may be, and the Issuer must specify whether the New Notes are
being defeased to maturity or to a particular redemption date; (ii) in the case
of Legal Defeasance, the Issuer shall have delivered to the Trustee an opinion
of counsel in the United States reasonably acceptable to the Trustee confirming
that (a) the Issuer has received from, or there has been published by, the
Internal Revenue Service a ruling or (b) since the date of the Indenture, there
has been a change in the applicable federal income tax law, in either case to
the effect that, and based thereon such opinion of counsel shall confirm that,
subject to customary assumptions and exclusions, the Holders of the outstanding
New Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax
purposes as a result of such Legal Defeasance and will be subject to federal
income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as
would have been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred; (iii) in the
case of Covenant Defeasance, the Issuer shall have delivered to the Trustee an
opinion of counsel in the United States reasonably acceptable to the Trustee
confirming that, subject to customary assumptions and exclusions, the Holders of
the outstanding New Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal
income tax purposes as a result of such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject
to federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and
75
<PAGE> 77
at the same times as would have been the case if such Covenant Defeasance had
not occurred; (iv) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing on the date of such deposit (other than a Default or Event of Default
resulting from the financing of amounts to be applied to such deposit) or
insofar as Events of Default from bankruptcy or insolvency events are concerned,
at any time in the period ending on the 91st day after the date of deposit; (v)
such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not result in a breach or
violation of, or constitute a default under any material agreement or instrument
(other than the Indenture) to which the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party or by which the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries is bound; (vi) the
Issuer must have delivered to the Trustee an opinion of counsel to the effect
that, subject to customary assumptions and exclusions (which assumptions and
exclusions shall not relate to the operation of Section 547 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code or any analogous New York State law provision), after the 91st
day following the deposit, the trust funds will not be subject to the effect of
any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or similar laws affecting
creditors' rights generally; (vii) the Issuer must deliver to the Trustee an
Officers' Certificate stating that the deposit was not made by the Issuer with
the intent of preferring the Holders of New Notes over the other creditors of
the Issuer with the intent of defeating, hindering, delaying or defrauding
creditors of the Issuer or others; and (viii) the Issuer must deliver to the
Trustee an Officers' Certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that
all conditions precedent provided for relating to the Legal Defeasance or the
Covenant Defeasance have been complied with.
TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE
A Holder may transfer or exchange New Notes in accordance with the
Indenture. The Registrar and the Trustee may require a Holder, among other
things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents and the
Issuer may require a Holder to pay any taxes and fees required by law or
permitted by the Indenture. The Issuer is not required to transfer or exchange
any Note selected for redemption. Also, the Issuer is not required to transfer
or exchange any New Notes for a period of 15 days before a selection of New
Notes to be redeemed.
The registered Holder of a New Note will be treated as the owner of it for
all purposes.
AMENDMENT, SUPPLEMENT AND WAIVER
Except as provided in the next two succeeding paragraphs, the Indenture,
the Subsidiary Guarantees, the New Notes or the Collateral Documents may be
amended or supplemented with the consent of the Holders of at least a majority
in principal amount of the New Notes then outstanding (including, without
limitation, consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer
or exchange offer for, New Notes), and any existing default or compliance with
any provision of the Indenture, the Subsidiary Guarantees or the New Notes may
be waived with the consent of the Holders of a majority in principal amount of
the then outstanding New Notes (including consents obtained in connection with a
purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, New Notes).
Without the consent of each Holder affected, an amendment or waiver may not
(with respect to any New Notes held by a non-consenting Holder): (i) reduce the
principal amount of New Notes whose Holders must consent to an amendment,
supplement or waiver, (ii) reduce the principal of or change the fixed maturity
of any New Note or alter the provisions with respect to the redemption of the
New Notes (other than provisions relating to the covenants described above under
the caption "-- Repurchase at the Option of Holders"), (iii) reduce the rate of
or change the time for payment of interest on any Note, (iv) waive a Default or
Event of Default in the payment of principal of or premium, if any, or interest
on the New Notes (except a rescission of acceleration of the New Notes by the
Holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the New Notes
and a waiver of the payment default that resulted from such acceleration), (v)
make any Note payable in money other than that stated in the New Notes, (vi)
make any change in the provisions of the Indenture relating to waivers of past
Defaults or the rights of Holders of New Notes to receive payments of principal
of or premium, if any, or interest on the New Notes, (vii) waive a redemption
payment with respect to any Note (other than a payment required by one of the
covenants described above under the caption "-- Repurchase at the Option of
Holders"), (viii) except as otherwise permitted by the Indenture, release any
Guarantor from any of its obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee or the
Indenture, or amend the
76
<PAGE> 78
provisions of the Indenture relating to the release of Guarantors, (ix) release
the Lien of the Collateral Agent in any of the Collateral other than pursuant to
the terms of the Indenture or the Collateral Documents or (x) make any change in
the foregoing amendment and waiver provisions.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, without the consent of any Holder of New
Notes, the Issuer, the Guarantors and the Trustee may amend or supplement the
Indenture, the Subsidiary Guarantees, the New Notes or the Collateral Documents
to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency, to provide for uncertificated
New Notes in addition to or in place of certificated New Notes, to provide for
the assumption of the Issuer's or a Guarantor's obligations to Holders of New
Notes in the case of a merger or consolidation, to make any change that would
provide any additional rights or benefits to the Holders of New Notes or that
does not adversely affect the legal rights under the Indenture or the Collateral
Documents of any such Holder, to comply with requirements of the Commission in
order to effect or maintain the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust
Indenture Act or to allow any Guarantor to guarantee the New Notes.
CONCERNING THE TRUSTEE
The Indenture contains certain limitations on the rights of the Trustee,
should it become a creditor of the Issuer, to obtain payment of claims in
certain cases, or to realize on certain property received in respect of any such
claim as security or otherwise. The Trustee will be permitted to engage in other
transactions; however, if it acquires any conflicting interest it must eliminate
such conflict within 90 days, apply to the Commission for permission to continue
or resign.
The Holders of a majority in principal amount of the then outstanding New
Notes will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any
proceeding for exercising any remedy available to the Trustee, subject to
certain exceptions. The Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default
shall occur (which shall not be cured), the Trustee will be required, in the
exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a prudent man in the conduct
of his own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the Trustee will be under no
obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the
request of any Holder of New Notes, unless such Holder shall have offered to the
Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or
expense.
BOOK-ENTRY, DELIVERY AND FORM
The Old Notes were offered and sold to qualified institutional buyers in
reliance on Rule 144A ("Rule 144A Notes"). The Old Notes were also offered and
sold in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S ("Regulation S
Notes"). Except as set forth below, the New Notes will be issued in registered,
global form in minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000
in excess thereof. New Notes will be issued at the closing of the Exchange Offer
(the "Closing") only against payment in immediately available funds.
The Global Notes will be deposited upon issuance with the Trustee as
custodian for DTC in New York, New York, and registered in the name of DTC or
its nominee, in each case for credit to an account of a direct or indirect
participant in DTC as described below.
Except as set forth below, the Global Notes may be transferred, in whole
and not in part, only to another nominee of DTC or to a successor of DTC or its
nominee. Beneficial interests in the Global Notes may not be exchanged for New
Notes in certificated form except in the limited circumstances described below.
See "-- Exchange of Book-Entry Notes for Certificated Notes." In addition,
transfer of beneficial interests in the Global Notes will be subject to the
applicable rules and procedures of DTC and its direct or indirect participants
(including, if applicable, those of Euroclear and CEDEL), which may change from
time to time.
Initially, the Trustee will act as Paying Agent and Registrar. The New
Notes may be presented for registration of transfer and exchange at the offices
of the Registrar.
77
<PAGE> 79
DEPOSITORY PROCEDURES
DTC has advised the Issuer that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company
created to hold securities for its participating organizations (collectively,
the "Participants") and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of
transactions in those securities between Participants through electronic
book-entry changes in accounts of its Participants. The Participants include
securities brokers and dealers (including the Initial Purchasers), banks, trust
companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Access to
DTC's system is also available to other entities such as banks, brokers, dealers
and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with
a Participant, either directly or indirectly (collectively, the "Indirect
Participants"). Persons who are not Participants may beneficially own securities
held by or on behalf of DTC only through the Participants or the Indirect
Participants. The ownership interests and transfer of ownership interests of
each actual purchaser of each security held by or on behalf of DTC are recorded
on the records of the Participants and Indirect Participants.
DTC has also advised the Issuer that, pursuant to procedures established by
it, (i) upon deposit of the Global Notes, DTC will credit the accounts of
Participants tendering Old Notes with portions of the applicable Global Notes
and (ii) ownership of such interests in the Global Notes will be shown on, and
the transfer of ownership thereof will be effected only through, records
maintained by DTC (with respect to the Participants) or by the Participants and
the Indirect Participants (with respect to other owners of beneficial interest
in the Global Notes).
Investors in the Rule 144A Global Notes may hold their interests therein
directly through DTC, if they are participants in such system, or indirectly
through organizations (including Euroclear and CEDEL) which are participants in
such system. Investors in the Regulation S Global Notes must initially hold
their interests therein through Euroclear or CEDEL, if they are participants in
such systems, or indirectly through organizations which are participants in such
systems. Euroclear and CEDEL will hold interests in the Global Notes on behalf
of their participants through customers' securities accounts in their respective
names on the books of their respective depositaries, which are Morgan Guaranty
Trust Company of New York, Brussels office, as operator of Euroclear, and
Citibank, N.A., as operator of CEDEL. The depositaries, in turn, will hold such
interests in the Global Notes in customers' securities accounts in the
depositaries' names on the books of DTC. All interests in a Global Note,
including those held through Euroclear or CEDEL, may be subject to the
procedures and requirements of DTC. Those interest held through Euroclear or
CEDEL may also be subject to the procedures and requirements of such systems.
The laws of some states require that certain persons take physical delivery in
definitive form of securities that they own. Consequently, the ability to
transfer beneficial interests in a Global Note to such persons will be limited
to that extent. Because DTC can act only on behalf of Participants, which in
turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants and certain banks, the ability of a
person having beneficial interests in a Global Note to pledge such interests to
persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take
actions in respect of such interests, may be affected by the lack of a physical
certificate evidencing such interests. For certain other restrictions on the
transferability of the New Notes, see "-- Exchange of Book-Entry New Notes for
Certificated New Notes," "-- Exchange of Certificated New Notes for Book-Entry
New Notes" and "-- Exchanges Between Regulation S New Notes and Rule 144A New
Notes."
EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED BELOW, OWNERS OF INTEREST IN THE GLOBAL NOTES WILL NOT
HAVE NEW NOTES REGISTERED IN THEIR NAMES, WILL NOT RECEIVE PHYSICAL DELIVERY OF
NEW NOTES IN CERTIFICATED FORM AND WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED THE REGISTERED OWNERS
OR HOLDERS THEREOF UNDER THE INDENTURE FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Payments in respect of the principal of and premium and interest on a
Global Note registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be payable by the
Trustee to DTC in its capacity as the registered Holder under the Indenture.
Under the terms of the Indenture, the Issuer and the Trustee will treat the
persons in whose names the New Notes, including the Global Notes, are registered
as the owners thereof for the purpose of receiving such payments and for any and
all other purposes whatsoever. Consequently, neither the Issuer, the Trustee nor
any agent of the Issuer or the Trustee has or will have any responsibility or
liability for (i) any aspect of DTC's records or any Participant's or Indirect
Participant's records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial
ownership interest in the Global Notes, or for maintaining, supervising or
reviewing any
78
<PAGE> 80
of DTC's records or any Participant's or Indirect Participant's records relating
to the beneficial ownership interests in the Global Notes or (ii) any other
matter relating to the actions and practices of DTC or any of its Participants
or Indirect Participants. DTC has advised the Issuer that its current practice,
upon receipt of any payment in respect of securities such as the New Notes
(including principal and interest), is to credit the accounts of the relevant
Participants with the payment on the payment date, in amounts proportionate to
their respective holdings in the principal amount of beneficial interest in the
relevant security as shown on the records of DTC unless DTC has reason to
believe it will not receive payment on such payment date. Payments by the
Participants and the Indirect Participants to the beneficial owners of New Notes
will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be
the responsibility of the Participants or the Indirect Participants and will not
be the responsibility of DTC, the Trustee or the Issuer. Neither the Issuer nor
the Trustee will be liable for any delay by DTC or any of its Participants in
identifying the beneficial owners of the New Notes, and the Issuer and the
Trustee may conclusively rely on and will be protected in relying on
instructions from DTC or its nominee for all purposes.
Except for trades involving only Euroclear and CEDEL participants, interest
in the Global Notes are expected to be eligible to trade in DTC's Same-Day Funds
Settlement System and secondary market trading activity in such interests will
therefore settle in immediately available funds, subject in all cases to the
rules and procedures of DTC and its participants. See "-- Same-Day Settlement
and Payment."
Transfers between Participants in DTC will be effected in accordance with
DTC's procedures, and will be settled in same-day funds, and transfers between
participants in Euroclear and CEDEL will be effected in the ordinary way in
accordance with their respective rules and operating procedures.
Subject to compliance with the transfer restrictions applicable to the New
Notes described herein, cross-market transfers between the Participants in DTC,
on the one hand, and Euroclear or CEDEL participants, on the other hand, will be
effected through DTC in accordance with DTC's rules on behalf of Euroclear or
CEDEL, as the case may be, by its respective depositary; however, such
cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to Euroclear or
CEDEL, as the case may be, by the counterparty in such system in accordance with
the rules and procedures and within the established deadlines (Brussels time) of
such system. Euroclear or CEDEL, as the case may be, will, if the transaction
meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its respective
depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering
or receiving interests in the relevant Global Note in DTC, and making or
receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds
settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear participants and CEDEL participants may
not deliver instructions directly to the depositaries for Euroclear or CEDEL.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a Euroclear or
CEDEL participant purchasing an interest in a Global Note from a Participant in
DTC will be credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the relevant
Euroclear or CEDEL participant, during the securities settlement processing day
(which must be a business day for Euroclear and CEDEL) immediately following the
settlement date of DTC. DTC has advised the Issuer that cash received in
Euroclear or CEDEL as a result of sales of interests in a Global Note by or
through a Euroclear or CEDEL participant to a Participant in DTC will be
received with value on the settlement date of DTC but will be available in the
relevant Euroclear or CEDEL cash account only as of the business day for
Euroclear or CEDEL following DTC's settlement date.
DTC has advised the Issuer that it will take any action permitted to be
taken by a Holder of New Notes only at the direction of one or more Participants
to whose account with DTC interests in the Global Notes are credited and only in
respect of such portion of the aggregate principal amount of the New Notes as to
which such Participant or Participants has or have given such direction.
However, if there is an Event of Default under the New Notes, DTC reserves the
right to exchange the Global Notes for legended New Notes in certificated form,
and to distribute such New Notes to its Participants.
The information in this section concerning DTC, Euroclear and CEDEL and
their book-entry systems has been obtained from sources that the Issuer believes
to be reliable, but the Issuer takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
79
<PAGE> 81
Although DTC, Euroclear and CEDEL have agreed to the foregoing procedures
to facilitate transfers of interests in the Global Notes among Participants in
DTC, Euroclear and CEDEL, they are under no obligation to perform or to continue
to perform such procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued at any time.
Neither the Issuer nor the Trustee will have any responsibility for the
performance by DTC, Euroclear or CEDEL or their respective participants or
indirect participants of their respective obligations under the rules and
procedures governing their operations.
EXCHANGE OF BOOK-ENTRY NEW NOTES FOR CERTIFICATED NOTES
A Global Note is exchangeable for definitive New Notes in registered
certificated form if (i) DTC (x) notifies the Issuer that it is unwilling or
unable to continue as depositary for the Global Note and the Issuer thereupon
fails to appoint a successor depositary or (y) has ceased to be a clearing
agency registered under the Exchange Act, (ii) the Issuer, at its option,
notifies the Trustee in writing that it elects to cause the issuance of the New
Notes in certificated form or (iii) there shall have occurred and be continuing
an Event of Default or any event which after notice or lapse of time or both
would be an Event of Default with respect to the New Notes. In addition,
beneficial interests in a Global Note may be exchanged for certificated New
Notes upon request but only upon at least 20 days prior written notice given to
the Trustee by or on behalf of DTC in accordance with its customary procedures.
In all cases, certificated New Notes delivered in exchange for any Global Note
or beneficial interests therein will be registered in the names, and issued in
any approved denominations, requested by or on behalf of the depositary (in
accordance with its customary procedures).
EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATED NEW NOTES FOR BOOK-ENTRY NEW NOTES
New Notes issued in certificated form may not be exchanged for beneficial
interests in any Global Note unless the transferor first delivers to the Trustee
a written certificate (in the form provided in the Indenture) to the effect that
such transfer will comply with the appropriate transfer restrictions applicable
to such New Notes as described under "Notice to Investors." In the case of any
such exchange for an interest in the Regulation S Global Note, such transfer
must occur pursuant to Regulation S or Rule 144 (if available).
EXCHANGES BETWEEN REGULATION S NEW NOTES AND RULE 144A NEW NOTES
Prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period, beneficial interests in
the Regulation S Global Note may be exchanged for beneficial interests in the
Rule 144A Global Note only if such exchange occurs in connection with a transfer
of the New Notes pursuant to Rule 144A and the transferor first delivers to the
Trustee a written certificate (in the form provided in the Indenture) to the
effect that the New Notes are being transferred to a person who the transferor
reasonably believes is a qualified institutional buyer within the meaning of
Rule 144A, purchasing for its own account or the account of a qualified
institutional buyer in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A and
in accordance with all applicable securities laws of the states of the United
States and other jurisdictions.
Beneficial interest in a Rule 144A Global Note may be transferred to a
person who takes delivery in the form of an interest in the Regulation S Global
Note, whether before or after the expiration of the Restricted Period, only if
the transferor first delivers to the Trustee a written certificate (in the form
provided in the Indenture) to the effect that such transfer is being made in
accordance with Rule 903 or 904 of Regulation S or Rule 144 (if available) and
that, if such transfer occurs prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period,
the interest transferred will be held immediately thereafter through Euroclear
or CEDEL.
Transfers involving an exchange of a beneficial interest in the Regulation
S Global Note for a beneficial interest in a Rule 144A Global Note or vice versa
will be effected in DTC by means of an instruction originated by the Trustee
through the DTC Deposit/Withdraw at Custodian system. Accordingly, in connection
with any such transfer, appropriate adjustments will be made to reflect a
decrease in the principal amount of the Regulation S Global Note and a
corresponding increase in the principal amount of the Rule 144A Global Note or
vice versa, as applicable. Any beneficial interest in one of the Global Notes
that is transferred to a person who takes delivery in the form of an interest in
the other Global Note will, upon transfer, cease to be an interest in such
Global Note and will become an interest in the other Global Note and,
80
<PAGE> 82
accordingly, will thereafter be subject to all transfer restrictions and other
procedures applicable to beneficial interest in such other Global Note for so
long as it remains such an interest.
SAME DAY SETTLEMENT AND PAYMENT
The Indenture will require that payments in respect of the New Notes
represented by the Global Notes (including principal, premium, if any, and
interest and Liquidated Damages, if any) be made by wire transfer of immediately
available funds to the accounts specified by the Global Note Holder. With
respect to New Notes in certificated form, the Issuer will make all payments of
principal, premium, if any, interest and Liquidated Damages, if any, by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the Holders
thereof or, if no such account is specified, by mailing a check to each such
Holder's registered address. The New Notes represented by the Global Notes are
expected to be eligible to trade in the PORTAL market and to trade in the
Depositary's Same-Day Funds Settlement System, and any permitted secondary
market trading activity in such New Notes will, therefore, be required by the
Depositary to be settled in immediately available funds. The Issuer expects that
secondary trading in any certificated New Notes will also be settled in
immediately available funds.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a Euroclear or
CEDEL participant purchasing an interest in a Global Note from a Participant in
DTC will be credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the relevant
Euroclear or CEDEL participant, during the securities settlement processing day
(which must be a business day for Euroclear and CEDEL) immediately following the
settlement date of DTC. DTC has advised the Issuer that cash received in
Euroclear or CEDEL as a result of sales of interests in a Global Note by or
through a Euroclear or CEDEL participant to a Participant in DTC will be
received with value on the settlement date of DTC but will be available in the
relevant Euroclear or CEDEL cash account only as of the business day for
Euroclear or CEDEL following DTC's settlement date.
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the Indenture. Reference
is made to the Indenture for a full disclosure of all such terms, as well as any
other capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is provided.
"Acquired Debt" means, with respect to any specified Person, (i)
Indebtedness of any other Person existing at the time such other Person is
merged with or into or became a Subsidiary of such specified Person, including,
without limitation, Indebtedness incurred in connection with, or in
contemplation of, such other Person merging with or into or becoming a
Subsidiary of such specified Person, and (ii) Indebtedness secured by a Lien
encumbering any asset acquired by such specified Person.
"Affiliate" of any specified Person means any other Person directly or
indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common
control with such specified Person. For purposes of this definition, "control"
(including, with correlative meanings, the terms "controlling," "controlled by"
and "under common control with"), as used with respect to any Person, shall mean
the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the
direction of the management or policies of such Person, whether through the
ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise; provided that
beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the voting securities of a Person shall
be deemed to be control.
"Asset Sale" means (i) the sale, lease (other than an operating lease),
conveyance or other disposition of any assets or rights (including, without
limitation, by way of a sale and leaseback) other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practices (provided that the sale, lease,
conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Issuer and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole will be governed by the provisions
of the Indenture described above under the caption "-- Change of Control" and/or
the provisions described above under the caption "-- Merger, Consolidation or
Sale of Assets" and not by the provisions of the Asset Sale covenant), and (ii)
the sale by the Issuer and the issue or sale by any of its Subsidiaries of
Equity Interests of any of the Issuer's Subsidiaries, in the case of either
clause (i) or (ii), whether in a single transaction or a series of related
transactions that have a fair market value (as determined in good faith by the
Board of Directors) in excess of $1.0 million or for net cash proceeds in excess
of $1.0 million. Notwithstand-
81
<PAGE> 83
ing the foregoing: (i) a transfer of assets by the Issuer to a Guarantor or by a
Guarantor to the Issuer or to another Guarantor, (ii) an issuance of Equity
Interests by a Guarantor to the Issuer or to another Guarantor, (iii) a
Restricted Payment that is permitted by the covenant described above under the
caption "-- Restricted Payments," (iv) a Collateral Asset Sale and (v) the sale
and leaseback of any assets within 90 days of the acquisition of such assets,
will not be deemed to be Asset Sales.
"Attributable Debt" in respect of a sale and leaseback transaction means,
at the time of determination, the present value (discounted at the rate of
interest implicit in such transaction, determined in accordance with GAAP) of
the obligation of the lessee for net rental payments during the remaining term
of the lease included in such sale and leaseback transaction (including any
period for which such lease has been extended or may, at the option of the
lessor, be extended).
"Capital Lease Obligation" means, at the time any determination thereof is
to be made, the amount of the liability in respect of a capital lease that would
at such time be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet in accordance with
GAAP.
"Capital Stock" means (i) in the case of a corporation, corporate stock,
(ii) in the case of an association or business entity, any and all shares,
interests, participations, rights or other equivalents (however designated) of
corporate stock, (iii) in the case of a partnership or limited liability
company, partnership or membership interests (whether general or limited) and
(iv) any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the right to
receive a share of the profits and losses of, or distributions of assets of, the
issuing Person.
"Cash Equivalents" means (i) securities issued or unconditionally and fully
guaranteed or insured by the full faith and credit of the United States
government or any agency or instrumentality thereof having maturities of not
more than one year from the date of acquisition, (ii) obligations issued or
unconditionally and fully guaranteed by any state of the United States of
America or any political subdivision of any such state or any public
instrumentality thereof maturing within one year from the date of acquisition
thereof and, at the time of acquisition, having one of the two highest ratings
obtainable from either Standard & Poor's Ratings Group ("S&P") or Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's"); (iii) certificates of deposit and
eurodollar time deposits with maturities of one year or less from the date of
acquisition, bankers' acceptances with maturities not exceeding one year and
overnight bank deposits, in each case with any lender party to the Credit
Facility or with any domestic commercial bank having capital and surplus in
excess of $250.0 million, (iv) repurchase obligations with a term of not more
than seven days for underlying securities of the types described in clauses (i)
and (iii) above entered into with any financial institution meeting the
qualifications specified in clause (iii) above, (v) commercial paper having one
of the two highest ratings obtainable from either Moody's or S&P and in each
case maturing within one year after the date of acquisition and (vi) investments
in funds investing exclusively in investments of the types described in clauses
(i) through (v) above.
"Change of Control" means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) the
sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of
merger or consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Issuer and its Subsidiaries taken as a
whole to any "person" (as such term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange
Act) other than the Principal and its Affiliates, (ii) the adoption of a plan
relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the Issuer, (iii) the consummation
of any transaction (including, without limitation, any merger or consolidation)
the result of which is that (A) any "person" (as defined above), other than the
Principal and its Affiliates, becomes the "beneficial owner" (as such term is
defined in Rule 13d-3 and Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act), directly or
indirectly, of 40% or more of the Voting Stock of the Issuer (measured by voting
power rather than number of shares) and (B) the Principal and its Affiliates
beneficially own, directly or indirectly, in the aggregate a lesser percentage
of the Voting Stock of the Issuer than such other "person," (iv) the first day
on which a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Issuer are
not Continuing Directors or (v) the Issuer consolidates with, or merges with or
into, any Person, or any Person consolidates with, or merges with or into, the
Issuer, in any such event pursuant to a transaction in which any of the
outstanding Voting Stock of the Issuer is converted into or exchanged for cash,
securities or other property, other than any such transaction where (A) the
Voting Stock of the Issuer outstanding immediately prior to such transaction is
converted into
82
<PAGE> 84
or exchanged for Voting Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the surviving
or transferee Person and (B) either (1) the "beneficial owners" (as defined
above) of the Voting Stock of the Issuer immediately prior to such transaction
own, directly or indirectly through one or more subsidiaries, not less than a
majority of the total Voting Stock of the surviving or transferee corporation
immediately after such transaction or (2) if, immediately prior to such
transaction the Issuer is a direct or indirect subsidiary of any other Person
(such other Person, the "Holding Company"), then the "beneficial owners" (as
defined above) of the Voting Stock of such Holding Company immediately prior to
such transaction own, directly or indirectly through one or more subsidiaries,
not less than a majority of the Voting Stock of the surviving or transferee
corporation immediately after such transaction.
"Collateral" means all property and assets, tangible and intangible, that
from time to time secure the New Notes pursuant to the applicable Collateral
Documents, including any Replacement Collateral.
"Collateral Asset Sale" means the sale, lease (other than an operating
lease), conveyance or other disposition of any Collateral (including, without
limitation, by means of an amalgamation, merger, consolidation or similar
transaction (each, a "Disposition") (provided that the sale, lease, conveyance
or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Issuer and
its Subsidiaries taken as a whole will be governed by the provisions of the
Indenture described above under the caption "-- Change of Control" and/or the
provisions described above under the caption "-- Merger, Consolidation or Sale
of Assets" and not by the provisions of the Collateral Asset Sale covenant), or
a series of related Dispositions by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries
involving the Collateral, other than (i) the sale for fair market value of
machinery, equipment, furniture, apparatus, tools or implements or other similar
property that may be defective or may have become worn out or obsolete or no
longer used or useful in the operations of the Issuer or (ii) the sale or
exchange of equipment at the Issuer's operating facilities with an aggregate
value not to exceed $5.0 million at any one time provided such equipment has
been replaced by equipment of equal or greater value within 180 days of such
sale or exchange. A Collateral Asset Sale shall not include the requisition of
title to or the seizure, condemnation, forfeiture or casualty of any Collateral.
"Collateral Documents" means, collectively, the Deeds of Trust, the
Security Agreements, the Pledge Agreements and any other agreements,
instruments, financing statements or other documents that evidence, set forth or
limit the Lien of the Collateral Agent in the Collateral.
"Consolidated Cash Flow" means, with respect to any Person for any period,
the Consolidated Net Income of such Person for such period plus (i) an amount
equal to any extraordinary loss plus any net loss realized in connection with an
Asset Sale (to the extent such losses were deducted in computing such
Consolidated Net Income), plus (ii) provision for taxes based on income or
profits of such Person and its Subsidiaries for such period, to the extent that
such provision for taxes was included in computing such Consolidated Net Income,
plus (iii) consolidated interest expense of such Person and its Subsidiaries for
such period, whether paid or accrued and whether or not capitalized (including,
without limitation, amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue
discount, non-cash interest payments, the interest component of any deferred
payment obligations, the interest component of all payments associated with
Capital Lease Obligations, imputed interest with respect to Attributable Debt,
commissions, discounts and other fees and charges incurred in respect of letter
of credit or bankers' acceptance financings, and net payments (if any) pursuant
to Hedging Obligations), to the extent that any such expense was deducted in
computing such Consolidated Net Income, plus (iv) depreciation and amortization
(including amortization of goodwill and other intangibles but excluding
amortization of prepaid cash expenses that were paid in a prior period) and
other non-cash expenses (excluding any such non-cash expense to the extent that
it represents an accrual of or reserve for cash expenses in any future period or
amortization of a prepaid cash expense that was paid in a prior period) of such
Person and its Subsidiaries for such period to the extent that such
depreciation, amortization and other non-cash expenses were deducted in
computing such Consolidated Net Income, plus (v) Recapitalization Related
Special Charges of such Person and its Subsidiaries for such period, to the
extent any such expense was deducted in computing Consolidated Net Income of
such Person for such period, plus (vi) deferred compensation expense of such
Person and its Subsidiaries for such period (provided, however, that any
payments actually made with respect to the liabilities for which such charges
were created shall be deducted from Consolidated Cash Flow in the period when
made), to the extent any such expense was
83
<PAGE> 85
deducted in computing Consolidated Net Income of such Person for such period,
plus (vii) the impact on Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person for such period,
an aggregate amount not to exceed $5.0 million since the Issue Date, of the
deferral of recognition of revenue by the Issuer until products are shipped by
the Issuer's distributors, minus (viii) non-cash items increasing such
Consolidated Net Income for such period, in each case, on a consolidated basis
and determined in accordance with GAAP. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
provision for taxes based on the income or profits of, and the depreciation and
amortization and other non-cash charges of, a Subsidiary of a Person shall be
added to Consolidated Net Income to compute Consolidated Cash Flow only to the
extent (and in the same proportion) that the Net Income of such Subsidiary was
included in calculating the Consolidated Net Income of such Person and only if a
corresponding amount would be permitted at the date of determination to be
dividended to the Issuer by such Subsidiary without prior approval (that has not
been obtained), pursuant to the terms of its charter and all agreements,
instruments, judgments, decrees, orders, statutes, rules and governmental
regulations applicable to that Subsidiary or its stockholders.
"Consolidated Net Income" means, with respect to any Person for any period,
the aggregate of the Net Income of such Person and its Subsidiaries for such
period, on a consolidated basis, determined in accordance with GAAP; provided
that (i) the Net Income (but not loss) of any Person that is not a Subsidiary or
that is accounted for by the equity method of accounting shall be included only
to the extent of the amount of dividends or distributions paid in cash to the
referent Person or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary thereof that is a Guarantor, (ii)
the Net Income of any Subsidiary shall be excluded to the extent that the
declaration or payment of dividends or similar distributions by that Subsidiary
of that Net Income is not at the date of determination permitted without any
prior governmental approval (that has not been obtained) or, directly or
indirectly, by operation of the terms of its charter or any agreement,
instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute, rule or governmental regulation
applicable to that Subsidiary or its stockholders, (iii) the Net Income of any
Person acquired in a pooling of interests transaction for any period prior to
the date of such acquisition shall be excluded, (iv) the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principles shall be excluded and (v) the amortization of
(A) any premiums, fees or expenses incurred in connection with the
Recapitalization and related financings, or (B) any amounts required or
permitted by Accounting Principles Board Opinion Nos. 16 (including non-cash
write-ups and non-cash charges relating to inventory and fixed assets, in each
case arising in connection with the Acquisition) and 17 (including non-cash
charges relating to intangibles and goodwill arising in connection with the
Acquisition) shall be excluded.
"Continuing Directors" means, as of any date of determination, any member
of the Board of Directors of the Issuer who (i) was a member of such Board of
Directors immediately after consummation of the Acquisition or (ii) was
nominated for election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval
of a majority of the Continuing Directors who were members of such Board at the
time of such nomination or election, or any successor Continuing Directors
appointed by such Continuing Directors (or their successors).
"Credit Facilities" means, with respect to the Issuer, one or more debt
facilities (including, without limitation, the Revolving Credit Facility) or
commercial paper facilities with banks or other institutional lenders providing
for revolving credit loans, term loans, receivables financing (including through
the sale of receivables to such lenders or to special purpose entities formed to
borrow from such lenders against such receivables) or letters of credit, in each
case, as amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced or refinanced
in whole or in part from time to time. Indebtedness under Credit Facilities
outstanding on the date on which New Notes are first issued and authenticated
under the Indenture shall be deemed to have been incurred on such date in
reliance on the exception provided by clause (i) of the definition of Permitted
Debt.
"Default" means any event that is or with the passage of time or the giving
of notice or both would be an Event of Default.
"Disqualified Stock" means any Capital Stock that, by its terms (or by the
terms of any security into which it is convertible or for which it is
exchangeable at the option of the holder thereof), or upon the happening of any
event, matures or is mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund
obligation or otherwise, or redeemable at the option of the Holder thereof, in
whole or in part, on or prior to the date on which the New Notes mature;
provided, however, that a class of Capital Stock shall not be Disqualified Stock
84
<PAGE> 86
hereunder solely as the result of any maturity or redemption that is conditioned
upon, and subject to, compliance with the covenant described above under the
caption "-- Certain Covenants -- Restricted Payments; and provided further, that
Capital Stock issued to any plan for the benefit of employees of the Issuer or
its subsidiaries or by any such plan to such employees shall not constitute
Disqualified Stock solely because it may be required to be repurchased by the
Issuer in order to satisfy applicable statutory or regulatory obligations.
"Equity Interests" means Capital Stock and all warrants, options or other
rights to acquire Capital Stock (but excluding any debt security that is
convertible into, or exchangeable for, Capital Stock).
"Event of Loss" means (i) the loss or destruction of or damage to any
Collateral, (ii) the condemnation, seizure, confiscation, requisition of the use
or taking by exercise of the power of eminent domain or otherwise of any
Collateral or (iii) any consensual settlement in lieu of any event listed in
clause (ii), in each case whether in a single event or a series of related
events, that results in Net Proceeds from all sources in excess of $5.0 million.
"Existing Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of the Issuer and its
Subsidiaries (other than Indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility) in
existence on the date of the Indenture, until such Indebtedness is repaid.
"Fixed Charges" means, with respect to any Person for any period, the sum,
without duplication, of (i) the consolidated interest expense (net of interest
income) of such Person and its Subsidiaries for such period, whether paid or
accrued (including, without limitation, amortization of debt issuance costs and
original issue discount, non-cash interest payments, the interest component of
all payments associated with Capital Lease Obligations, imputed interest with
respect to Attributable Debt, commissions, discounts and other fees and charges
incurred in respect of letter of credit or bankers' acceptance financings, and
net payments (if any) pursuant to Hedging Obligations); provided, however, that
in no event shall any amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in
connection with the Recapitalization be included in Fixed Charges, (ii) the
consolidated interest expense of such Person and its Subsidiaries that was
capitalized during such period, (iii) any interest expense on Indebtedness of
another Person that is Guaranteed by such Person or one of its Subsidiaries or
secured by a Lien on assets of such Person or one of its Subsidiaries (whether
or not such Guarantee or Lien is called upon) and (iv) the product of (a)
(without duplication) (1) all dividends paid or accrued in respect of
Disqualified Stock which are not treated as interest for tax purposes and (2)
all cash dividend payments, on any series of preferred stock of such Person or
any of its Subsidiaries, other than dividend payments on Equity Interests
payable solely in Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of the
Issuer, times (b) a fraction, the numerator of which is one and the denominator
of which is one minus the then current combined federal, state and local
statutory tax rate of such Person, expressed as a decimal, in each case, on a
consolidated basis and in accordance with GAAP.
"Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio" means with respect to any Person for any
period, the ratio of the Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person and its
Subsidiaries for such period to the Fixed Charges of such Person and its
Subsidiaries for such period. In the event that the Issuer or any of its
Subsidiaries incurs, assumes, Guarantees, repays or redeems any Indebtedness
(other than revolving credit borrowings) or issues or redeems preferred stock
subsequent to the commencement of the period for which the Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio is being calculated but prior to the date on which the event for which the
calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is made (the "Calculation Date"),
then the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio shall be calculated giving pro forma effect
to such incurrence, assumption, Guarantee, repayment or redemption of
Indebtedness, or such issuance or redemption of preferred stock, as if the same
had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter reference period.
In addition, for purposes of making the computation referred to above, (i)
acquisitions that have been made by the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries,
including through mergers or consolidations and including any related financing
transactions, during the four-quarter reference period or subsequent to such
reference period and on or prior to the Calculation Date shall be deemed to have
occurred on the first day of the four-quarter reference period and Consolidated
Cash Flow for such reference period shall be calculated without giving effect to
clause (iii) of the proviso set forth in the definition of Consolidated Net
Income and shall reflect any pro forma expense and cost reductions attributable
to such
85
<PAGE> 87
acquisitions, (to the extent such expense and cost reduction would be permitted
by the Commission to be reflected in pro forma financial statements included in
a registration statement filed with the Commission) and (ii) the Consolidated
Cash Flow attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance
with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the Calculation
Date, shall be excluded, and (iii) the Fixed Charges attributable to
discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations
or businesses disposed of prior to the Calculation Date, shall be excluded, but
only to the extent that the obligations giving rise to such Fixed Charges will
not be obligations of the referent Person or any of its Subsidiaries following
the Calculation Date.
"GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles set forth in the
opinions and pronouncements of the Accounting Principles Board of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and statements and pronouncements of
the Financial Accounting Standards Board or in such other statements by such
other entity as have been approved by a significant segment of the accounting
profession, which are in effect on the date of the Indenture; provided, however,
that all reports and other financial information provided by the Issuer to the
Holders, the Trustee and/or the Commission shall be prepared in accordance with
GAAP, as in effect on the date of such report or other financial information.
"Guarantee" means a guarantee (other than by endorsement of negotiable
instruments for collection in the ordinary course of business), direct or
indirect, in any manner (including, without limitation, letters of credit and
reimbursement agreements in respect thereof), of all or any part of any
Indebtedness.
"Guarantors" means each direct and indirect Subsidiary of the Issuer that
executes a Subsidiary Guarantee in accordance with the provisions of the
Indenture, and their respective successors and assigns.
"Hedging Obligations" means, with respect to any Person, the obligations of
such Person under (i) interest rate swap agreements, interest rate cap
agreements and interest rate collar agreements and (ii) other agreements or
arrangements designed to protect such Person against fluctuations in interest
rates or the value of foreign currencies.
"Indebtedness" means, with respect to any Person, any indebtedness of such
Person, whether or not contingent, in respect of borrowed money or evidenced by
bonds, notes, notes or similar instruments or letters of credit (or
reimbursement agreements in respect thereof) or banker's acceptances or
representing Capital Lease Obligations or the balance deferred and unpaid of the
purchase price of any property or representing any Hedging Obligations, except
any such balance that constitutes an accrued expense or trade payable, if and to
the extent any of the foregoing indebtedness (other than letters of credit and
Hedging Obligations) would appear as a liability upon a balance sheet of such
Person prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as all indebtedness of others
secured by a Lien on any asset of such Person (whether or not such indebtedness
is assumed by such Person) and, to the extent not otherwise included, the
Guarantee by such Person of any indebtedness of any other Person. The amount of
any Indebtedness outstanding as of any date shall be (i) the accreted value
thereof, in the case of any Indebtedness that does not require current payments
of interest, and (ii) the principal amount thereof, together with any interest
thereon that is more than 30 days past due, in the case of any other
Indebtedness.
"Investments" means, with respect to any Person, all investments by such
Person in other Persons (including Affiliates) in the forms of direct or
indirect loans (including guarantees of Indebtedness or other obligations),
advances or capital contributions (excluding commission, travel and similar
advances to officers and employees made in the ordinary course of business),
purchases or other acquisitions for consideration of Indebtedness, Equity
Interests or other securities, together with all items that are or would be
classified as investments on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP.
If the Issuer or any Subsidiary of the Issuer sells or otherwise disposes of any
Equity Interests of any direct or indirect Subsidiary of the Issuer such that,
after giving effect to any such sale or disposition, such Person is no longer a
Subsidiary of the Issuer, the Issuer shall be deemed to have made an Investment
on the date of any such sale or disposition equal to the fair market value of
the Equity Interests of such Subsidiary not sold or disposed of in an amount
determined as provided in the final paragraph of the covenant described above
under the caption "-- Restricted Payments."
"Issue Date" means February 27, 1998.
86
<PAGE> 88
"Lien" means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge,
charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset,
whether or not filed, recorded or otherwise perfected under applicable law
(including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any lease in
the nature thereof, and any option or other agreement to give a security
interest).
"Net Income" means, with respect to any Person, the net income (loss) of
such Person, determined in accordance with GAAP and before any reduction in
respect of preferred stock dividends, excluding, however, (i) any gain (but not
loss), together with any related provision for taxes on such gain (but not
loss), realized in connection with (a) any Asset Sale or Collateral Asset Sale
(including, without limitation, dispositions pursuant to sale and leaseback
transactions) or (b) the disposition of any securities by such Person or any of
its Subsidiaries or the extinguishment of any Indebtedness of such Person or any
of its Subsidiaries and (ii) any extraordinary or nonrecurring gain (but not
loss), together with any related provision for taxes on such extraordinary or
nonrecurring gain (but not loss).
"Net Proceeds" means the aggregate cash proceeds received by the Issuer or
any of its Subsidiaries in respect of any Asset Sale or Collateral Asset Sale
(including, without limitation, any cash received upon the sale or other
disposition of any non-cash consideration received in any Asset Sale or
Collateral Asset Sale), net of the direct costs relating to such Asset Sale or
Collateral Asset Sale (including, without limitation, legal, accounting and
investment banking fees, and sales commissions) and any relocation expenses
incurred as a result thereof, taxes paid or payable as a result thereof (after
taking into account any available tax credits or deductions and any tax sharing
arrangements), amounts required to be applied to the repayment of Indebtedness
(other than Indebtedness under the Credit Facilities) secured by a Lien on the
asset or assets that were the subject of such Asset Sale or Collateral Asset
Sale and any reserve for adjustment in respect of the sale price of such asset
or assets established in accordance with GAAP.
"Obligations" means, with respect to any Indebtedness, any principal,
premium, interest, penalties, fees, indemnifications, reimbursements, damages
and other liabilities payable under the documentation governing such
Indebtedness.
"Permitted Investments" means (a) any Investment in the Issuer or in a
Subsidiary; (b) any Investment in cash and Cash Equivalents; (c) any Investment
by the Issuer or any Subsidiary in a Person, if as a result of such Investment
(i) such Person becomes a Subsidiary or (ii) such Person is merged, consolidated
or amalgamated with or into, or transfers or conveys substantially all of its
assets to, or is liquidated into, the Issuer or a Subsidiary; (d) any Restricted
Investment made as a result of the receipt of non-cash consideration from an
Asset Sale that was made pursuant to and in compliance with the covenant
described above under the caption "-- Repurchase at the Option of
Holders -- Asset Sales" or a transaction not constituting an Asset Sale by
reason of the $1 million threshold contained in the definition thereof; (e) any
acquisition of assets solely in exchange for the issuance of Equity Interests
(other than Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer; (f) Hedging Obligations entered
into in the ordinary course of business by the Issuer or its Subsidiaries and
otherwise in accordance with the Indenture; (g) loans and advances to employees
and officers of the Issuer and its Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of
business for bona fide business purposes not in excess of $5.0 million at any
one time outstanding; (h) Investments in securities of trade creditors or
customers received in settlement of obligations or pursuant to any plan of
reorganization or similar arrangement upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of such
trade creditors or customers; and (i) other Investments in any Person having an
aggregate fair market value (measured on the date each such Investment was made
and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value), when taken together
with all other Investments made pursuant to this clause (i) that are at the time
outstanding, not to exceed $25.0 million.
"Permitted Liens" means (i) Liens existing as of the Issue Date to the
extent and in the manner such Liens are in effect on the Issue Date; (ii) Liens
on Collateral securing the New Notes, the Exchange New Notes and the Subsidiary
Guarantees; (iii) Liens of the Issuer or a Guarantor on assets of any Subsidiary
of the Issuer; (iv) Liens securing Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness which is
incurred to refinance any Indebtedness which has been secured by a Lien
permitted under the Indenture and which has been incurred in accordance with the
provisions of the Indenture; provided, however, that such Liens (A) are not
materially less favorable to the Holders and are not materially more favorable
to the lienholders with respect to such
87
<PAGE> 89
Liens than the Liens in respect of the Indebtedness being refinanced and (B) do
not extend to or cover any property or assets of the Issuer or any of its
Subsidiaries not securing the Indebtedness so refinanced; (v) Liens for taxes,
assessments or governmental charges or claims either (A) not delinquent or (B)
contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and as to which the Issuer or
its Subsidiaries shall have set aside on its books such reserves as may be
required pursuant to GAAP; (vi) statutory Liens of landlords and Liens of
carriers, warehousemen, mechanics, suppliers, materialmen, repairmen and other
Liens imposed by law incurred in the ordinary course of business for sums not
yet delinquent for a period of more than 60 days or being contested in good
faith, if such reserve or other appropriate provision, if any, as shall be
required by GAAP shall have been made in respect thereof; (vii) Liens incurred
or deposits made in the ordinary course of business in connection with workers'
compensation, unemployment insurance and other types of social security or
similar obligations, including any Lien securing letters of credit issued in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice in connection
therewith, or to secure the performance of tenders, statutory obligations,
surety and appeal bonds, bids, leases, government contracts, performance and
return-of-money bonds and other similar obligations (exclusive of obligations
for the payment of borrowed money); (viii) judgment Liens not giving rise to an
Event of Default so long as such Lien is adequately bonded and any appropriate
legal proceedings which may have been duly initiated for the review of such
judgment shall not have been finally terminated or the period within which such
proceedings may be initiated shall not have expired; (ix) easements,
rights-of-way, zoning restrictions and other similar charges or encumbrances in
respect of real property not interfering in any material respect with the
ordinary conduct of the business of the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries; (x)
any interest or title of a lessor under any lease, whether or not characterized
as capital or operating; provided that such Liens do not extend to any property
or assets which is not leased property subject to such lease; (xi) Liens
securing Capital Lease Obligations and purchase money Indebtedness incurred in
accordance with clause (iv) of the definition of Permitted Debt; provided,
however that in the case of purchase money Indebtedness (A) the Indebtedness
shall not exceed the cost of such property or assets being acquired or
constructed and shall not be secured by any property or assets of the Issuer or
any Subsidiary of the Issuer other than the property and assets being acquired
or constructed and (B) the Lien securing such Indebtedness shall be created
within 90 days of such acquisition or construction; (xii) Liens upon specific
items of inventory or other goods and proceeds of any Person securing such
Person's obligations in respect of bankers' acceptances issued or created for
the account of such Person to facilitate the purchase, shipment or storage of
such inventory or other goods; (xiii) Liens securing reimbursement obligations
with respect to letters of credit which encumber documents and other property
relating to such letters of credit and products and proceeds thereof; (xiv)
Liens encumbering deposits made to secure obligations arising from statutory,
regulatory, contractual, or warranty requirements of the Issuer or any of its
Subsidiaries, including rights of offset and set-off; (xv) Liens securing
Hedging Obligations which Hedging Obligations relate to Indebtedness that is
otherwise permitted under the Indenture; (xvi) Liens securing Acquired Debt
incurred in accordance with clause (x) of the definition of Permitted Debt;
provided that (A) such Liens secured such Acquired Debt at the time of and prior
to the incurrence of such Acquired Debt by the Issuer or a Subsidiary of the
Issuer and were not granted in connection with, or in anticipation of, the
incurrence of such Acquired Debt by the Issuer or a Subsidiary of the Issuer and
(B) such Liens do not extend to or cover any property or assets of the Issuer or
of any of its Subsidiaries other than the property or assets that secured the
Acquired Debt prior to the time such Indebtedness became Acquired Debt of the
Issuer or a Subsidiary of the Issuer and are no more favorable to the
lienholders than those securing the Acquired Debt prior to the incurrence of
such Acquired Debt by the Issuer or a Subsidiary of the Issuer; (xvii) leases or
subleases granted to others not interfering in any material respect with the
business of the Issuer or its Subsidiaries; (xviii) Liens arising out of
consignment or similar arrangements for the sale of goods entered into by the
Issuer or any Subsidiary in the ordinary course of business; (xix) Liens
incurred in the ordinary course of business of the Issuer or any Subsidiary of
the Issuer with respect to obligations that do not exceed $5.0 million at any
one time outstanding and that (a) are not incurred in connection with the
borrowing of money or the obtaining of advances or credit (other than trade
credit in the ordinary course of business) and (b) do not in the aggregate
materially detract from the value of the property or materially impair the use
thereof in the operation of business by the Issuer or such Subsidiary and (xx)
Liens on inventory, accounts receivable and the proceeds thereof securing
working capital Indebtedness of the Issuer and liens on cash collateral
constituting proceeds of accounts receivable or inventory securing letters of
credit
88
<PAGE> 90
or mandatory prepayments of working capital Indebtedness secured thereby, which
Indebtedness is, in each case, incurred in compliance with the Indenture.
"Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness" means any Indebtedness of the Issuer
or any of its Subsidiaries issued in exchange for, or the net proceeds of which
are used to extend, refinance, prepay, retire, renew, replace, defease or refund
Indebtedness of the Issuer or any of its Subsidiaries (other than such
Indebtedness described in clauses (i), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (xi), (xii) or
(xiii) of the covenant described above under the caption "-- Certain
Covenants -- Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock;"
provided that: (i) the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of
such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal amount of
(or accreted value, if applicable), plus accrued interest on, the Indebtedness
so extended, refinanced, prepaid, retired, renewed, replaced, defeased or
refunded (plus the amount of reasonable expenses incurred in connection
therewith including premiums paid, if any, to the holders thereof); (ii) such
Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity date at or later than
the final maturity date of, and has a Weighted Average Life to Maturity equal to
or greater than the Weighted Average Life to Maturity of, the Indebtedness being
extended, refinanced, prepaid, retired, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded;
(iii) if the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, prepaid, retired, renewed,
replaced, defeased or refunded is subordinated in right of payment to the New
Notes, such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity date later
than the final maturity date of, and is subordinated in right of payment to, the
New Notes on terms at least as favorable to the Holders of New Notes as those
contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness being extended,
refinanced, prepaid, retired, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded; and (iv)
such Indebtedness is incurred either by the Issuer or by the Subsidiary who is
the obligor on the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, prepaid, retired,
renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded.
"Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability
company, unincorporated organization, trust or joint venture, or a governmental
agency or political subdivision thereof.
"Principal" means TPG Partners II, L.P.
"Public Equity Offering" means an underwritten public offering of common
stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer, pursuant to an effective
registration statement filed with the Commission in accordance with the
Securities Act, other than an offering pursuant to Form S-8 (or any successor
thereto).
"Qualified Proceeds" means any of the following or any combination of the
following: (i) cash, (ii) Cash Equivalents, (iii) long-term assets that are used
or useful in the business of the Issuer or its subsidiaries on the Issue Date or
businesses reasonably related thereto (the "Permitted Business"), (iv) the
Capital Stock of any Person engaged primarily in a Permitted Business if, in
connection with the receipt by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary of the
Issuer of such Capital Stock, (a) such Person becomes a Wholly Owned Subsidiary
and a Guarantor or (b) such Person is merged, consolidated or amalgamated with
or into, or transfers or conveys substantially all of its assets to, or is
liquidated into, the Issuer or any Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Issuer that is
a Guarantor.
"Recapitalization Related Special Charges" means (i) up to $10.0 million of
retention bonuses paid to employees of the Issuer within six months following
the Issue Date, (ii) up to $5.0 million of (x) severance costs paid by the
Issuer within six months following the Issue Date and (y) bonuses paid by the
Issuer to members of management of the Issuer retained effective on or after
January 1, 1998 and paid within six months following the Issue Date, (iii)
expense incurred by the Issuer as a result of (x) payments made by the Issuer on
the Issue Date in respect of options to purchase common stock of the Issuer
outstanding on the Issue Date and (y) the grant by the Issuer on the Issue Date
of options to purchase common stock of the Issuer and (iv) consulting fees, not
exceeding $1.5 million, paid by the Issuer within six months following the Issue
Date.
"Replacement Collateral" means, at any relevant date in connection with a
Collateral Asset Sale or Event of Loss, assets used in the Issuer's business
other than the Collateral, which on such date (i) constitute similar assets to
Collateral disposed of or destroyed and do not constitute Capital Stock of any
Person, (ii) are acquired by the Issuer at a purchase price which does not
exceed the fair market value of such Replacement Collateral (as determined in
the case of each of (i) and (ii), in good faith by the Board of Directors of the
89
<PAGE> 91
Issuer,) and made available to the Collateral Agent, (iii) are free and clear of
all Liens other than Permitted Liens, and (iv) are subject to the Collateral
Documents.
"Restricted Investment" means an Investment other than a Permitted
Investment.
"Revolving Credit Facility" means that certain revolving credit facility,
dated as of February 27, 1998, by and among the Issuer, Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P. and BankBoston, N.A., as agents and lenders, providing for up to
$25.0 million of revolving credit borrowings, including any related notes,
guarantees, collateral documents, instruments and agreements executed in
connection therewith, and in each case as amended, extended, modified, renewed,
refunded, replaced or refinanced from time to time.
"Significant Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary that would be a "significant
subsidiary" as defined in Article 1, Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X, promulgated
pursuant to the Act, as such Regulation is in effect on the date of the
Indenture.
"Stated Maturity" means, with respect to any installment of interest or
principal on any series of Indebtedness, the date on which such payment of
interest or principal was scheduled to be paid in the original documentation
governing such Indebtedness, and shall not include any contingent obligations to
repay, redeem or repurchase any such interest or principal prior to the date
originally scheduled for the payment thereof.
"Subsidiary" means, with respect to any Person, (i) any corporation,
association or other business entity of which more than 50% of the total voting
power of shares of Voting Stock is at the time owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such Person or one or more of the other Subsidiaries of that
Person (or a combination thereof) and (ii) any partnership (a) the sole general
partner or the managing general partner of which is such Person or a Subsidiary
of such Person or (b) the only general partners of which are such Person or of
one or more Subsidiaries of such Person (or any combination thereof).
"Voting Stock" of any Person as of any date means the Capital Stock of such
Person that is at the time entitled to vote in the election of the Board of
Directors of such Person.
"Weighted Average Life to Maturity" means, when applied to any Indebtedness
at any date, the number of years obtained by dividing (i) the sum of the
products obtained by multiplying (a) the amount of each then remaining
installment, sinking fund, serial maturity or other required payments of
principal, including payment at final maturity, in respect thereof, by (b) the
number of years (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth) that will elapse between
such date and the making of such payment, by (ii) the then outstanding principal
amount of such Indebtedness.
"Wholly Owned Subsidiary" of any Person means a Subsidiary of such Person
all of the outstanding Capital Stock or other ownership interests of which
(other than directors' qualifying shares) shall at the time be owned by such
Person or by one or more Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of such Person or a
combination thereof.
90
<PAGE> 92
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS
IN GENERAL
The following summary describes the principal United States federal income
tax consequences of the exchange of Old Notes for New Notes (the "Exchange") and
the principal U.S. federal tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of Notes, but does not purport to be a comprehensive description of
all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to exchange Old
Notes. In particular, special tax considerations that may apply to certain types
of taxpayers, including securities dealers, banks, tax-exempt investors and
insurance companies, are not addressed. In addition, this summary does not
describe any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality or
taxing jurisdiction other than the United States federal government. In general,
this summary assumes that a holder holds Notes as capital assets under the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") and not as part of a "hedge,"
"straddle," "conversion transaction," "synthetic security" or other integrated
investment.
This summary is based on the U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, rulings
and judicial and administrative decisions in effect or available on the date
hereof. All of the foregoing are subject to change, which change may apply
retroactively and could affect the continued validity of this summary.
As used in this section, the term "U.S. Holder" means a holder of a Note
who is a citizen or resident of the United States, which is a corporation,
partnership or other entity created or organized under the laws of the U.S. or
any state or political subdivision thereof, which is an estate that is subject
to U.S. federal income taxation without regard to the source of its income, or
which is a trust the administration of which is subject to the primary
supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more U.S. persons who have the
authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust and the term
"Non-U.S. Holder" means any holder of Notes other than a U.S. Holder.
ALL HOLDERS OF OLD NOTES ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS
REGARDING THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXCHANGE OF
OLD NOTES FOR NEW NOTES AND OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF NOTES, INCLUDING
NEW NOTES RECEIVED IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER, IN VIEW OF THEIR OWN PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES.
EXCHANGE OF OLD NOTES FOR NEW NOTES
The Exchange pursuant to the Exchange Offer will not be a taxable event for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a holder of an Old Note whose Old
Note is accepted in the Exchange Offer will not recognize gain on the Exchange.
A tendering holder's tax basis in the New Notes will be the same as such
holder's tax basis in its Old Notes. A tendering holder's holding period for the
New Notes received pursuant to the Exchange Offer will include its holding
period for the Old Notes surrendered therefor.
OTHER U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR U.S. HOLDERS OF NOTES
Original Issue Discount and Stated Interest. The Old Notes were issued and
the New Notes will be issued without original issue discount. Stated interest on
the Notes will be includable in a U.S. Holder's income in accordance with such
holder's method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Sale, Exchange and Retirement of Notes. Upon the sale, exchange,
redemption, retirement or other taxable disposition of a Note, a U.S. Holder
generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount
realized on such disposition and the U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Note. Except
as discussed below under " --Market Discount," gain or loss recognized by a U.S.
Holder on such disposition of a Note will be capital gain or loss and will, in
the case of individuals, be long-term capital gain or loss subject to a maximum
federal income tax rate of 20% if the Note has been held for more than 18 months
at the time of such disposition. Net capital gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on
such a disposition of Notes held for more than 12 months but for not more than
18 months will be subject to tax at a federal income tax rate not to exceed 28%
and capital gain recognized from such a disposition of Notes held for 12 months
or less will be
91
<PAGE> 93
subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates. In addition, capital gain
recognized by a U.S. corporate taxpayer will be subject to tax at the ordinary
income tax rates applicable to corporations.
Market Discount. If a Note is acquired by a subsequent purchaser at a
"market discount," some or all of any gain realized upon a disposition
(including a sale or a taxable exchange) or payment at maturity of such Note may
be treated as ordinary income. "Market discount" with respect to a Note is,
subject to a de minimis exception, the excess of (i) the issue price of the Old
Note exchanged therefor plus all previously accrued original issue discount, if
any, over (ii) such U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Note. The amount of market
discount treated as having accrued will be determined either on a ratable basis,
or, if the U.S. Holder so elects, using a constant-yield method. Upon any
subsequent disposition (including a gift or payment at maturity) of such Note
(other than in connection with certain nonrecognition transactions), the lesser
of any gain on such disposition (or appreciation, in the case of a gift) or the
portion of the market discount that accrued while the Note was held by such U.S.
Holder will be treated as ordinary interest income at the time of the
disposition. In lieu of including accrued market discount in income at the time
of disposition, a U.S. Holder may elect to include market discount in income
currently. Unless a U.S. Holder so elects, such U.S. Holder may be required to
defer a portion of any interest expense that may otherwise be deductible on any
indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase or carry such Note until the
U.S. Holder disposes of the Note.
Bond Premium. If New Notes are purchased or Old Notes were purchased for an
amount in excess of all remaining payments on the Notes other than qualified
stated interest (such excess generally being "bond premium"), the U.S. Holder
may elect to amortize the bond premium over the period from the date of
acquisition to the maturity date of the Notes and reduce the amount of interest
included in income in respect of the Notes by such amortized amount. Bond
premium may be offset against interest realized in respect of the taxable year
of the U.S. Holder in an amount that is based upon the U.S. Holder's yield to
maturity determined by using the U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Notes and
compounding at the close of each accrual period. A U.S. Holder who elects to
amortize bond premium must reduce its adjusted tax basis for the Notes by the
amount of such allowable amortization. Under certain circumstances, the amount
of bond premium and the amortization period may be determined with reference to
the optional redemption price and date of the Notes. The election to amortize
bond premium is revocable only with the consent of the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service and applies to all obligations owned or subsequently acquired by the
electing U.S. Holder.
OTHER U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS
Interest. Interest paid by the Company to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be
subject to United States federal income or withholding tax if such interest is
not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the
United States by such Non-U.S. Holder and such Non-U.S. Holder (i) does not
actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of
all classes of stock of the Company, (ii) is not a controlled foreign
corporation with respect to which the Company is a "related person" within the
meaning of the Code and (iii) certifies, under penalties of perjury, that such
holder is not a United States person and provides such holder's name and
address.
Gain on Disposition. A Non-U.S. Holder will generally not be subject to
United States federal income tax on gain recognized on a sale, redemption or
other disposition of a Note unless (i) the gain is effectively connected with
the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by the Non-U.S.
Holder or (ii) in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder who is a nonresident alien
individual and holds the Note as a capital asset, such holder is present in the
United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year and certain other
requirements are met.
Federal Estate Taxes. If interest on the Notes is exempt from withholding
of United States federal income tax under the rules described above under
"-- Interest," the Notes will not be included in the estate of a deceased
Non-U.S. Holder for United States federal estate tax purposes.
92
<PAGE> 94
INFORMATION REPORTING AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING
The Company will, where required, report to the holders of Notes and the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service the amount of any interest paid on the Notes in
each calendar year and the amounts of tax withheld, if any, with respect to such
payments.
Under current United States federal income tax law, a 31% "backup"
withholding tax is applied to certain payments made to, and to the proceeds of
sales before maturity by, certain U.S. persons if such persons (i) fail to
furnish their taxpayer identification numbers which, for an individual, would be
such individual's Social Security Number or (ii) in certain circumstances, fail
to certify, under penalties of perjury, that they have both furnished a correct
taxpayer identification number and not been notified by the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service that they are subject to backup withholding for failure to
report interest and dividend payments.
In the case of payments of interest to Non-U.S. Holders, temporary U.S.
Treasury Department regulations provide that the 31% backup withholding tax and
certain information reporting requirements will not apply to such payments with
respect to which either the requisite certification, as described above under
"-- Other U.S. Federal Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders-Interest," has
been received or an exemption has otherwise been established, as long as neither
the Company nor its payment agent has actual knowledge that the holder is a
United States person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not in
fact satisfied. Under temporary U.S. Treasury Department regulations, these
information reporting and backup withholding requirements will apply, however,
to the gross proceeds paid to a Non-U.S. Holder on the disposition of Notes by
or through a United States office of a United States or foreign broker, unless
the holder certifies to the broker under penalties of perjury as to its name,
address and status as a foreign person or the holder otherwise establishes an
exemption. Information reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, will
also apply to a payment of the proceeds of a disposition of Notes by or through
a foreign office of either a United States broker or a foreign broker with
certain types of relationships to the United States, unless such broker has
documentary evidence in its file that the holder of the Notes is not a United
States person, and such broker has no actual knowledge to the contrary, or the
holder establishes an exception. Neither information reporting nor backup
withholding generally will apply to a payment of the proceeds of a disposition
of Notes by or through a foreign office of a foreign broker not having any of
the requisite relationships to the United States.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the
backup withholding rules may be refunded or credited against the Non-U.S.
Holder's United States federal income tax liability, provided that the required
information is furnished to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
The U.S. Treasury Department recently promulgated final regulations
regarding the withholding and information reporting rules discussed above. In
general, the final regulations do not significantly alter the substantive
withholding and information reporting requirements but rather unify current
certification procedures and forms and clarify reliance standards. As originally
promulgated, the final regulations were to be generally effective for payments
made after December 31, 1998, subject to certain transition rules; however, the
U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service subsequently announced
that the December 31, 1998 date would be extended to December 31, 1999. Non-U.S.
Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the impact, if
any, of the new final regulations.
93
<PAGE> 95
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account pursuant to
the Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus meeting
the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of such New
Notes. This Prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time,
may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of New Notes received
in exchange for Old Notes where such Old Notes were acquired as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities. The Issuer has agreed that
it will make this Prospectus available to any Participating Broker-Dealer for a
period of time not to exceed one year after the date on which the Exchange Offer
is consummated for use in connection with any such resale. In addition, until
such date, all broker-dealers effecting transactions in the New Notes may be
required to deliver a prospectus.
The Issuer will not receive any proceeds from any sale of New Notes by
broker-dealers. New Notes received by broker-dealers for their own account
pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be sold from time to time in one or more
transactions in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions, through
the writing of options on the New Notes or a combination of such methods of
resale, at market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at prices related to
such prevailing market prices or negotiated prices. Any such resale may be made
directly to purchasers or to or through brokers or dealers who may receive
compensation in the form of commissions or concessions from any such
broker-dealer and/or the purchasers of any such New Notes. Any broker-dealer
that resells New Notes that were received by it for its own account pursuant to
the Exchange Offer and any broker or dealer that participates in a distribution
of such New Notes may be deemed to be an "underwriter" within the meaning of the
Securities Act and any profit on any such resale of New Notes and any
commissions or concessions received by any such persons may be deemed to be
underwriting compensation under the Securities Act. The Letter of Transmittal
states that by acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a
prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an
"underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act.
Starting on the Expiration Date, the Issuer will promptly send additional
copies of this Prospectus and any amendment or supplement to this Prospectus to
any broker-dealer that requests such documents in the Letter of Transmittal. The
Issuer has agreed to pay all expenses incident to the Exchange Offer (including
the expenses of one counsel for the holders of the Old Notes) other than
commissions or concessions of any brokers or dealers and will indemnify the
holders of the Old Notes (including any broker-dealers) against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters in connection with the Exchange Offer are being
passed upon for Zilog by Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP, Palo Alto, California.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Zilog, Inc. and its subsidiaries
at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1997, appearing in this Prospectus and in the Registration
Statement have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set
forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in
reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
94
<PAGE> 96
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Report of Ernst and Young LLP, Independent Auditors......... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets................................. F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income........................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows....................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity............. F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-7
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE> 97
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Zilog, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Zilog, Inc.
as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Zilog, Inc. at
December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
February 6, 1998, except for Note 2,
as to which the date is February 27, 1998
F-2
<PAGE> 98
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PAR VALUE AMOUNTS)
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------- APRIL 5,
1996 1997 1998
--------- --------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 15,511 $ 92,184 $ 66,890
Short-term investments.................................... 53,412 14,127 --
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $250 in 1996, 1997 and 1998......................... 29,395 31,633 28,107
Inventories............................................... 34,469 32,968 32,511
Prepaid expenses, deferred income taxes and other current
assets................................................. 15,516 19,769 20,114
--------- --------- ---------
Total current assets.............................. 148,303 190,681 147,622
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements................ 34,061 34,314 34,316
Machinery and equipment................................... 345,867 381,144 388,402
--------- --------- ---------
379,928 415,458 422,718
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization............ (131,217) (191,881) (207,756)
--------- --------- ---------
Net property, plant and equipment................. 248,711 223,577 214,962
Other assets................................................ 4,052 1,381 10,521
--------- --------- ---------
$ 401,066 $ 415,639 $ 373,105
========= ========= =========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 28,786 $ 24,733 $ 23,993
Accrued compensation and employee benefits................ 17,545 18,284 19,453
Other accrued liabilities................................. 5,116 5,287 8,084
Income taxes payable...................................... 8,289 10,783 2,301
--------- --------- ---------
Total current liabilities......................... 59,736 59,087 53,831
Notes payable............................................... -- -- 280,000
Deferred income taxes....................................... 16,050 16,070 16,070
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' Equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 190,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 1996 and 1997. (At April 5, 1998:
Preferred Stock, $100 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; 1,500,000 shares designated as Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock; 250,000 shares of Series A
Cumulative Preferred issued and outstanding; aggregate
liquidation preference $25,000)........................ -- -- 25,000
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares
authorized, 20,127,976 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 1996 and 20,333,742 shares at December 31,
1997. (At April 5, 1998: Common Stock, $.01 par value;
35,000,000 shares authorized; 14,999,368 shares issued
and outstanding; Class A Non-Voting Common Stock, $.01
par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,000,000
shares issued and outstanding)......................... 201 203 200
Additional paid-in capital................................ 161,599 164,950 --
Retained earnings (deficit)............................... 163,375 175,236 (1,996)
Net unrealized gains on securities (Net of tax effect) 105 93 --
--------- --------- ---------
Total shareholders' equity........................ 325,280 340,482 23,204
--------- --------- ---------
$ 401,066 $ 415,639 $ 373,105
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See Accompanying Notes.
F-3
<PAGE> 99
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THREE MONTHS ENDED
-------------------------------- ------------------------------
1995 1996 1997 MARCH 30, 1997 APRIL 5, 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------------- -------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales............................ $265,122 $298,425 $261,097 $70,136 $ 49,539
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales.................. 135,066 175,319 171,722 44,028 40,767
Research and development....... 24,546 30,548 30,467 6,632 8,104
Selling, general and
administrative.............. 41,943 47,934 47,806 12,052 13,941
Recapitalization............... -- -- -- -- 13,304
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
201,555 253,801 249,995 62,712 76,116
Operating income (loss).......... 63,567 44,624 11,102 7,424 (26,577)
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net........... 2,676 2,443 2,892 595 1,159
Interest expense............... -- -- -- -- (2,978)
Other, net, including license
and royalty income and
expense..................... (360) (911) 832 (880) (88)
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Income (loss) before income
taxes.......................... 65,883 46,156 14,826 7,139 (28,484)
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes.......................... 23,418 16,155 2,965 2,356 (8,545)
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Net income (loss)................ 42,465 30,001 11,861 4,783 (19,939)
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax............. 1,003 (72) (12) 58 (93)
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Comprehensive income............. $ 43,468 $ 29,929 $ 11,849 $ 4,841 $(20,032)
======== ======== ======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
See Accompanying Notes.
F-4
<PAGE> 100
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS)
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THREE MONTHS ENDED
--------------------------------- ------------------------------
1995 1996 1997 MARCH 30, 1997 APRIL 5, 1998
--------- --------- --------- -------------- -------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)................... $ 42,465 $ 30,001 $ 11,861 $ 4,783 $ (19,939)
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation...................... 27,214 48,315 63,750 15,150 16,015
Loss from disposition of
equipment...................... 386 100 50 3 --
Deferred income taxes............. 4,794 3,811 (2,229) -- --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable............ (5,640) 13,666 (2,238) (3,381) 3,526
Inventories.................... (7,171) (6,317) 1,501 2,456 457
Prepaid expenses, and other
assets....................... (9,956) 5,000 201 26 (452)
Accounts payable............... (2,620) (7,421) (4,053) (6,991) (740)
Accrued compensation and
employee benefits............ 2,068 2,798 739 (2,363) 1,173
Other accrued liabilities and
income taxes payable......... 3,322 1,683 3,062 1,550 (5,966)
--------- --------- --------- -------- ---------
Cash provided by (used
for) operating
activities.............. 54,862 91,636 72,644 11,233 (5,926)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures................ (79,346) (117,065) (38,437) (11,991) (7,260)
Short-term investments:
Purchases......................... (112,240) (55,006) (229,730) (10,755) --
Proceeds from sales............... 87,121 45,035 141,936 7,156 14,127
Proceeds from maturities.......... 33,076 30,095 127,304 -- --
--------- --------- --------- -------- ---------
Cash provided by (used
for) investing
activities.............. (71,389) (96,941) 1,073 (15,590) 6,867
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of stock..... 16,276 13,032 2,956 442 208
Purchase of outstanding shares...... -- -- -- -- (399,475)
Merger expenses charged to retained
earnings.......................... -- -- -- -- (15,202)
Proceeds of Notes payable........... -- -- -- -- 270,734
Investment by TPG................... -- -- -- -- 117,500
--------- --------- --------- -------- ---------
Cash provided (used) by financing
activities..................... 16,276 13,032 2,956 442 (26,235)
--------- --------- --------- -------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents....................... (251) 7,727 76,673 (3,915) (25,294)
Cash and cash
equivalents -- beginning of
period............................ 8,035 7,784 15,511 15,511 92,184
--------- --------- --------- -------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents -- end of
period............................ $ 7,784 $ 15,511 $ 92,184 $ 11,596 $ 66,890
========= ========= ========= ======== =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash
flow information --
Cash paid for:
Income taxes...................... $ 12,754 $ 9,249 $ 1,905 $ 311 $ 53
========= ========= ========= ======== =========
</TABLE>
See Accompanying Notes.
F-5
<PAGE> 101
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK CLASS A NON-VOTING NET
----------------- -------------------- ------------------ UNREALIZED
ADDITIONAL GAIN
PAID-IN RETAINED (LOSS) ON
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS SECURITIES
------- ------- ----------- ------ --------- ------ ---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 1995... -- $ -- 18,499,965 $ 185 $ -- $ -- $122,327 $ 90,909 $ (826)
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option and
stock purchase plans,
including tax benefit of
$6,525..................... -- -- 955,662 10 -- -- 22,791 -- --
Adjustments to unrealized
gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,003
Net income................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 42,465 --
------- ------- ----------- ----- --------- ---- -------- --------- ------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1995....................... -- -- 19,455,627 195 -- -- 145,118 133,374 177
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option and
stock purchase plans,
including tax benefit of
$3,455..................... -- -- 672,349 6 -- -- 16,481 -- --
Adjustments to unrealized
gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (72)
Net income................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,001 --
------- ------- ----------- ----- --------- ---- -------- --------- ------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1996....................... -- -- 20,127,976 201 -- -- 161,599 163,375 105
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option and
stock purchase plans,
including tax benefit of
$397....................... -- -- 205,766 2 -- -- 3,351 -- --
Adjustments to unrealized
gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (12)
Net income................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,861 --
------- ------- ----------- ----- --------- ---- -------- --------- ------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1997....................... -- -- 20,333,742 203 -- -- 164,950 175,236 93
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option plans
plus tax benefit
(unaudited)................ -- -- 14,852 -- -- -- 212 -- --
Adjustment to unrealized gain
on sale of
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
(unaudited)................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (93)
Purchase of outstanding
shares (unaudited)......... (20,348,594) (203) -- -- (165,162) (234,110) --
TPG investment, new stock
issued (unaudited)......... 250,000 25,000 14,999,368 150 5,000,000 50 -- 92,300 --
Preferred dividends accrued
(unaudited)................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (281) --
One time merger charges
(unaudited)................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (15,202) --
Net loss (unaudited)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (19,939) --
------- ------- ----------- ----- --------- ---- -------- --------- ------
BALANCE AT APRIL 5, 1998
(UNAUDITED)................ 250,000 $25,000 14,999,368 $ 150 5,000,000 $ 50 $ -- $ (1,996) $ --
======= ======= =========== ===== ========= ==== ======== ========= ======
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
-------------
<S> <C>
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 1995... $ 212,595
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option and
stock purchase plans,
including tax benefit of
$6,525..................... 22,801
Adjustments to unrealized
gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax..... 1,003
Net income................... 42,465
---------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1995....................... 278,864
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option and
stock purchase plans,
including tax benefit of
$3,455..................... 16,487
Adjustments to unrealized
gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax..... (72)
Net income................... 30,001
---------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1996....................... 325,280
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option and
stock purchase plans,
including tax benefit of
$397....................... 3,353
Adjustments to unrealized
gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax..... (12)
Net income................... 11,861
---------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1997....................... 340,482
Issuance of Common Stock
under stock option plans
plus tax benefit
(unaudited)................ 212
Adjustment to unrealized gain
on sale of
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
(unaudited)................ (93)
Purchase of outstanding
shares (unaudited)......... (399,475)
TPG investment, new stock
issued (unaudited)......... 117,500
Preferred dividends accrued
(unaudited)................ (281)
One time merger charges
(unaudited)................ (15,202)
Net loss (unaudited)......... (19,939)
---------
BALANCE AT APRIL 5, 1998
(UNAUDITED)................ $ 23,204
=========
</TABLE>
See Accompanying Notes.
F-6
<PAGE> 102
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of business: Zilog designs, develops, manufactures and markets
application specific standard products (ASSPs) for the data communications,
consumer product controller and intelligent peripheral controller markets.
Principles of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Zilog, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant transactions
and accounts between the Company and these subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Interim Financial Information: The interim financial information for the
three month periods ended March 30, 1997 and April 5, 1998 is unaudited;
however, in the opinion of the Company's management, all adjustments (including
normal recurring adjustments), necessary for a fair statement of interim results
have been included. The results for the three months ended April 5, 1998 are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.
Revenue recognition: Certain of the Company's sales are made through
distributors under agreements allowing limited right of return and price
protection on merchandise unsold by the distributors. Revenue is recognized at
the time of shipment with appropriate reserves provided for returns and price
allowances. Royalty income is recognized on a quarterly basis when the income is
earned and received from the licensees.
Foreign currency translation: All of the Company's subsidiaries use the
U.S. dollar as the functional currency. Accordingly, monetary accounts and
transactions are remeasured at current exchange rates, and nonmonetary accounts
are remeasured at historical rates. Revenues and expenses are remeasured at the
average exchange rates for each period, except for depreciation expense which is
remeasured at historical rates. Foreign currency exchange gains and (losses)
were included in determining results of operations and aggregated $(508,000),
$(540,000), and $940,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively.
Fair values of financial instruments: The Company's short-term investments
consist primarily of various State and Municipal bonds. Cash and cash
equivalents consist primarily of cash in bank accounts and overnight investments
in commercial paper. The following methods and assumptions were used by the
Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount (at cost), in the balance
sheet for cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 1996 and 1997 were
$15,511,000 and $92,184,000 respectively, which approximates fair value, due to
their short maturities.
Short-term investments: The fair values for marketable debt securities are
based on quoted market prices. Investments consist primarily of marketable debt
securities which are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are reported in shareholders'
equity. The cost basis of investments is adjusted for amortization of premiums
and accretion of discounts to maturity, which is included in interest income.
Realized gains and losses are included in other income. The cost of securities
sold is based on the specific identification method.
F-7
<PAGE> 103
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of December
31, 1996 and 1997 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
--------- ---------
MUNICIPAL MUNICIPAL
BONDS BONDS
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Cost.................................................... $53,250 $14,011
Gross Unrealized Gains.................................. 173 116
Gross Unrealized (Losses)............................... (11) --
------- -------
Estimated Fair Value.................................... $53,412 $14,127
======= =======
</TABLE>
The gross realized gains and losses on sales for the year ended December
31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 were not significant.
The maturities for the marketable debt securities at December 31, 1996 and
1997 are shown below (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
--------------------- ---------------------
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
COST FAIR VALUE COST FAIR VALUE
------- ---------- ------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Due in 1 year or less.............. $30,831 $30,921 $14,011 $14,127
Due after 1 year through 3 years... 22,419 22,491 -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
$53,250 $53,412 $14,011 $14,127
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which
approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market and consist
of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, APRIL 5,
1996 1997 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Raw materials.............................. $ 5,385 $ 4,171 $ 4,081
Work-in-process............................ 23,412 23,543 23,199
Finished goods............................. 5,672 5,254 5,231
------- ------- -------
$34,469 $32,968 $32,511
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Property, plant and equipment: Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets which are
generally five years for machinery and equipment and thirty years for buildings.
Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the shorter of the
remaining terms of the leases or the estimated economic lives of the
improvements.
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments which potentially
subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash
equivalents, short-term investments and trade accounts receivable. By policy,
the Company places its investments only with high credit quality financial
institutions. Almost all of the Company's trade accounts receivable are derived
from sales to electronics distributors and to manufacturers of consumer
products, intelligent computer peripherals and products which network computers
and peripherals. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers' financial condition and
F-8
<PAGE> 104
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
limits its exposure to accounting losses by limiting the amount of credit
extended whenever deemed necessary and generally does not require collateral.
Stock Awards: The Company accounts for employee stock awards in accordance
with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. As stock
option grants are issued with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the
stock, the Company recognizes no compensation expense for stock option grants.
Additionally, as the Stock Purchase Plan qualifies as an "Employee Stock
Purchase Plan" under Section 423 of the Code, no compensation expense is
recorded. Pro forma information required by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation is presented in Note 5, below.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In June 1997, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board issued Statement No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (FAS
No. 130) and Statement No. 131. Disclosures About Segments of An Enterprise and
Related Information (FAS No. 131). FAS No. 130 establishes rules for reporting
and displaying comprehensive income. FAS No. 131 will require the Company to use
the "management approach" in disclosing segment information. Both statements are
effective for the Company during 1998. FAS No. 130 was adopted on January 1,
1998.
NOTE 2. THE MERGER
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among TPG Partners II,
L.P. (TPG II), TPG Zeus Acquisition Corporation ("Merger Sub") and Zilog dated
as of July 20, 1997, as amended (the "Merger Agreement"), Merger Sub merged with
and into Zilog on February 27, 1998, and Zilog continues as the surviving
corporation (the "Merger"). By virtue of the Merger, 374,842 shares of Zilog
common stock held by certain of Zilog's stockholders prior to the Merger remain
outstanding. All other shares of outstanding common stock were canceled and
converted into the right to receive cash consideration. By virtue of the Merger,
the common stock of Merger Sub was converted into new shares of common stock,
non-voting common stock and preferred stock of Zilog. Also in connection with
the Merger, stock options to purchase shares of common stock issued under
Zilog's stock plans outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the
Merger were canceled and, in certain instances, were converted into the right to
receive an amount in cash, as set forth in the Merger Agreement. The transaction
was accounted for as a recapitalization which resulted in TPG II owning 90% of
the voting shares and pre-Merger shareholders owning 10% of the voting shares.
Because TPG II acquired less than substantially all of the Common Stock the
basis of the Company's assets and liabilities were not impacted by the
transaction.
In connection with the Merger, Zilog amended its articles of incorporation
with respect to the Company's authorized share capital. Authorized shares are as
follows: (i) 5,000,000 shares of $100 par value preferred stock, (ii) 15,000,000
of $0.01 par value Class A Non-Voting common stock and (iii) 35,000,000 shares
of $0.01 par value common stock. Immediately after consummation of the Merger,
the Board of Directors declared a 4-for-1 stock split in the form of a dividend
for each share of Common Stock and Class A Non-voting Common Stock and
designated 1,500,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock.
As of April 5, 1998 approximately $431.5 million was used to complete the
Merger as follows: (i) $399.5 million for the purchase of the pre-Merger
outstanding common stock; (ii) $4.2 million for the cancellation of existing
stock options; and (iii) $27.8 million in fees and expenses.
The cash funding requirements for the Merger were satisfied through the
following: (i) an equity investment by TPG II and certain other investors of
$117.5 million; (ii) use of approximately $34.0 million of Zilog's cash and cash
equivalents; and (iii) $280 million of gross proceeds from the sale of senior
secured notes through a private placement. As a result of the Merger (on a
post-split basis), the Company has
F-9
<PAGE> 105
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
1,500,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock, 15,000,000 shares of
common stock and 5,000,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting common stock issued and
outstanding.
Upon consummation of the Merger, Zilog obtained a revolving credit
facility, under which $25 million may be borrowed, secured by certain
inventories and accounts receivable. The revolving credit facility and the
indenture governing the senior secured notes contain covenants that, among other
things, limit the ability of the Company and its Subsidiaries to incur
additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock, pay dividends or
distributions, make investments or certain other restricted payments, enter into
certain transactions with affiliates, dispose of certain assets, incur liens and
engage in mergers and consolidations. In addition, under the revolving credit
facility, Zilog is required to maintain specified financial ratios and tests,
including minimum interest coverage ratios, minimum fixed charge coverage ratios
and leverage ratios below a specified maximum.
The revolving credit facility contains customary events of default,
including nonpayment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants,
cross default and cross-acceleration to certain other indebtedness, certain
events of bankruptcy and insolvency, material judgments against Zilog,
invalidity or any guaranty or security interest and a change of control of Zilog
in certain circumstances as set forth therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
for the first year following the closing date of the Merger, Zilog's failure to
be in compliance with the covenants contained in the revolving credit facility
shall not, with certain specified exceptions, constitute an event of default so
long as no loans or letters of credit are outstanding thereunder.
The Company has issued $280.0 million 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes, which
mature on February 27, 2005. Interest is payable to note holders on each quarter
end from the date of issuance. Expenses associated with the offering of
approximately $9.3 million are deferred. Such expenses are being amortized to
interest expense over the term of the notes.
Interest on the revolving credit facility will be calculated as the sum of
the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate plus the Applicable Margin in effect during the
time of the applicable Interest Period selected by the Company. There have been
no borrowings on the revolving credit facility as of April 5, 1998.
Recapitalization expenses incurred through April 5, 1998 in connection with
the change in control and merger consist of the following (in thousands of
dollars):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Stock option buy out........................................ $ 4,195
Bridge loan fees............................................ 3,360
Employee retention bonus.................................... 3,333(1)
Executives severance and bonus.............................. 2,361
Other....................................................... 55
-------
Recapitalization expenses......................... $13,304
=======
</TABLE>
(1) An employee retention bonus of approximately $10.0 million will be payable
in the third quarter of 1998. The costs of the bonus are being recognized
ratably over the six (6) month vesting period.
NOTE 3. STATE OF INCORPORATION
The Company changed the state of incorporation from California to Delaware
in May 1997. As a result of that change, no par Common Stock became $.01 par
Common Stock under the State of Delaware Corporation laws. All share information
was retroactively adjusted to reflect the $.01 par value.
F-10
<PAGE> 106
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Employee Performance Incentive Plan: Under the amended 1987 Employee
Performance Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), domestic exempt employees not
included in any other Company incentive program are eligible to participate in
incentive awards. The Incentive Plan provided for awards of up to 7.5% of pretax
profit (as defined) for the periods 1995, 1996 and 1997 dependent upon the
attainment of certain operating results. Results of operations were charged
approximately $3,893,000, $2,141,000, and $2,421,000 in the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, under this plan. The Incentive Plan may
be continued, discontinued or amended by the Company's Board of Directors.
Savings Plan: The Company has an employee savings plan that qualifies as a
deferred salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Under the plan, participating U.S. employees may defer a portion of their pretax
earnings, up to the Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limit ($9,500
for calendar year 1997). The Company may make matching contributions on behalf
of each participating employee in an amount equal to 100% of the participant's
deferral contribution, up to 1 1/2% of the participant's compensation on a
quarterly basis. The Company may also make additional discretionary
contributions to the 401(k) Plan up to a limit set by federal tax law. Matching
contributions to the savings plan were approximately $549,000, $589,000, and
$583,000 in 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. The discretionary contributions
for 1995, 1996 and 1997 were approximately $1,308,000, $2,354,000, and
$1,820,000, respectively.
NOTE 5. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock: Holders of Common Stock will be entitled to one vote per
share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Approval of matters
brought before the stockholders will require the affirmative vote of a majority
of the holders of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, except as otherwise
required by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL").
Holders of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock will not have any voting rights,
except the right to vote as a class to the extent required by DGCL.
Except for differences in voting rights described above, the rights,
powers, preferences and limitations of the Common Stock and Class A Non-Voting
Common Stock are identical. Subject to the rights of holders of Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock and other classes and/or series of preferred stock,
if any, all shares of Common Stock and Class A Non-Voting Common Stock are
entitled to share in such dividends as the Board of Directors may from time to
time declare from sources legally available therefor. Subject to the rights of
creditors and holders of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock and other classes
and/or series of preferred stock, if any, holders of Common Stock and Class A
Non-Voting Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in a distribution of
assets of the Surviving Corporation upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of the Surviving Corporation.
Preferred Stock: The Board of Directors has the authority to issue, from
time to time, by resolution and without any action by stockholders, up to
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $100.00 per share, in one or more
classes and/or series and may establish the powers, designations, preferences,
rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions (which may differ with
respect to each such class and/or series) of such class and/or series. Upon
consummation of the Recapitalization, the Board of Directors adopted a
resolution providing for the creation of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock
into which the shares of capital stock of Merger Sub were converted in the
Merger. The Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock is a non-voting 13.5% preferred
stock with a stated value of $100.00 per share.
The Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock will accumulate dividends at the
rate of 13.5% per annum (payable quarterly) for periods ending on or prior to
the anniversary of the Effective Time in 2008, and 15.5% per annum thereafter.
Dividends will be payable, at the election of the Board of Directors but subject
to
F-11
<PAGE> 107
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
availability of funds and the terms of the Senior Secured Notes and Revolving
Credit Facility, in cash or in kind through a corresponding increase in the
liquidation preference (as described below) of the Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock. The Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock has an initial liquidation
preference of $100.00 per share.
To the extent that a quarterly dividend payment in respect of a share of
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock is not made in cash when due, the amount of
such unpaid dividend will accumulate (whether or not declared by the Board of
Directors) through an increase in the liquidation preference of such share of
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock equal to the amount of such unpaid dividend,
and compounding dividends will accumulate on all such accumulated and unpaid
dividends. The liquidation preference will be reduced to the extent that
previously accumulated dividends are thereafter paid in cash. The Issuer is
required on the anniversary of the Effective Time in 2008 to pay in cash all
accumulated dividends that have been applied to increase the liquidation
preference (the "Clean-Down").
Shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option
of the Issuer, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices ranging from 105%,
if redeemed prior to the six-month anniversary of the Effective Time in 1998, to
100%, if redeemed after the six-month anniversary of the Effective Time in 2003,
in each case of the sum of (i) the liquidation preference thereof, increased to
the extent that accumulated dividends thereon shall not have been paid in cash,
plus (ii) accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date of redemption.
Optional redemption of the Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock will be subject
to, and expressly conditioned upon, certain limitations under the Senior Secured
Notes and Revolving Credit Facility.
In certain circumstances, including the occurrence of a change of control
of the Issuer, but again subject to certain limitations under the Senior Secured
Notes and Revolving Credit Facility, the Issuer may be required to repurchase
shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock at 101% of the sum of the
liquidation preference thereof, increased to the extent that accumulated
dividends thereon shall not have been paid in cash, plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends to the repurchase date.
Holders of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock will not have any voting
rights with respect thereto, except for (i) such rights as are provided under
the DGCL, (ii) the right to elect, as a class, one director of the Issuer in the
event that the Issuer fails to comply with its Clean-Down or repurchase
obligations and (iii) class voting rights with respect to transactions adversely
affecting the rights, preferences or powers of the Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock and certain transactions involving stock that ranks junior in payment of
dividends, or upon liquidation, to the Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock.
Stock Purchase Plan: During 1990, the Company adopted an employee stock
purchase plan (the "Stock Purchase Plan") allowing eligible employees to
purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock. The total number of shares of
Common Stock authorized for issuance under the plan is 600,000. All full-time
employees of the Company are eligible to participate, subject to certain limited
exceptions. The Stock Purchase Plan provides a means for the Company's employees
to purchase stock through payroll deductions of up to 10% of their gross
compensation. The purchase price for shares offered under the Stock Purchase
Plan is equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price of the Common Stock on
the first day of the six month offer period, or the last day of the six month
offer period. Shares purchased under the Plan were 47,875, 65,087 and 92,898 in
1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. Subscriptions of the Stock Purchase Plan were
suspended after the expiration in October, 1997 of the six month offer period.
Upon completion of the Merger, the Plan was terminated.
Stock Option Plans: The Zilog New Employee and Employee Promotion Common
Share Option Plan (the "1989 Option Plan") and The Zilog Employee Common Share
Option Plan (the "1990 Option Plan") expired during 1995, and no further stock
options may be granted under these plans. In April 1994, the 1994 Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan (the "1994 Option Plan") was adopted, effective January 1,
1994.
F-12
<PAGE> 108
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
Under the 1994 Option Plan, the Company may grant to eligible employees:
restricted shares, stock units, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock
options or stock appreciation rights, to purchase up to a total of 3,542,208
shares as of December 31, 1997. The exercise price for incentive stock options,
nonqualified stock options and stock appreciation rights will be determined by
the Board of Directors. Under the terms of the plan, restricted shares and stock
units may be awarded to eligible employees at no cost. No options have been
granted since July 1997. Upon completion of the Merger, the 1994 Option Plan was
terminated.
Options under the plans generally vested 25% at the end of one year from
the date of grant and 25% on each anniversary of the grant date thereafter.
Eligible employees under the option plans are new employees and employees at
certain position classification levels within the Company. Effective January 1,
1995 and on each January 1 thereafter for the remaining term of the Plan, an
additional 1,000,000 Common Shares shall be reserved for award as Restricted
Shares, Stock Units, Options and SARs. Any Common Shares that have been reserved
but not awarded as Restricted Shares, Stock Units, Options and SARs during any
calendar year shall not remain available for award in any subsequent calendar
year. All options granted had 10 year terms.
Shares granted and canceled for 1996, include a Stock Option Replacement
offered by the Company to existing grant holders of unexercised shares of the
1994 plan which were granted prior to October 18, 1996. Under the terms of the
Stock Option Replacement offer, 2,494,352 shares were canceled and re-granted at
the market value of the common stock, at the election of the grant holder. These
new grants are not otherwise exercisable for one year from the date of the stock
option replacement on November 6, 1996, but with the same vesting schedule and
expiration date of the original grants.
The following table summarizes activity under the 1989, 1990 and 1994
Option Plans:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
SHARES --------------------------
AVAILABLE PRICE PER
FOR GRANT SHARES SHARE
---------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1994......... 433,182 4,662,860 $ 0.13-$35.25
Shares reserved...................... 1,000,000 -- --
Granted.............................. (1,644,600) 1,644,600 $29.75-$47.75
Exercised............................ -- (907,787) $ 0.13-$35.25
Canceled............................. 248,913 (549,149) $ 2.67-$47.75
---------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1995......... 37,495 4,850,524 $ 0.13-$47.75
========== =========
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE> 109
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information
for the year ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES OPTIONS
AVAILABLE SHARES WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
FOR GRANT OUTSTANDING EXERCISE PRICE
---------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1996......... 37,495 4,850,524 $27.12
Shares reserved.................... 1,000,000 -- --
Granted............................ (3,598,502) 3,598,502 $25.56
Exercised.......................... -- (607,262) $19.12
Canceled........................... 2,561,007 (3,171,491) $33.16
---------- ---------- ------
Balance at December 31, 1996....... -- 4,670,273 $20.67
Shares reserved.................... 1,000,000 -- --
Granted............................ (916,800) 916,800 $22.84
Exercised.......................... -- (112,868) $12.89
Canceled........................... (83,200) (330,872) $21.79
---------- ---------- ------
Balance at December 31, 1997....... -- 5,143,333 $21.11
========== ========== ======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
------------------------------------------
WEIGHTED OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
AVERAGE ----------------------------
REMAINING WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
RANGE OF NUMBER CONTRACTUAL AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING LIFE EXERCISE PRICE EXERCISABLE EXERCISE PRICE
--------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
At December, 1997:
$ 0.13 -- $10.00............... 180,543 2.93 years $ 5.68 180,543 $ 5.68
$10.66 -- $20.00............... 2,531,803 7.80 years $19.36 1,359,443 $18.83
$20.16 -- $30.00............... 2,163,289 7.26 years $22.91 1,092,026 $22.44
$30.12 -- $47.75............... 267,698 7.42 years $33.53 168,609 $32.55
--------- ------ --------- ------
$ 0.13 -- $47.75............... 5,143,333 7.38 years $21.11 2,800,621 $20.22
========= ====== ========= ======
</TABLE>
The weighted average fair value of options granted in 1997, 1996 and 1995
were $8.52, $9.23 and $12.26 per share, respectively.
Pro Forma Stock Based Compensation: Pro forma information regarding net
income and earnings per share is required by FASB Statement 123, which also
requires that the information be determined as if the Company has accounted for
its employee options granted subsequent to December 31,1994 under the fair value
method of that statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the
date of grant utilizing a Black-Scholes option pricing model with a multiple
option approach. The following weighted-average assumptions for 1995, 1996, and
1997, respectively, were used: risk-free interest rates (annual average) of
6.4%, 5.5%, and 6.1%; dividend yields of zero; volatility factors of the
expected market price of the Company's common stock of .40, .67, and .47; and a
weighted-average expected life of the option of 4.5 years.
To comply with the pro forma reporting requirements of FAS No. 123 for
stock awards granted under the employee stock purchase plan, compensation cost
is estimated for the fair value of the employees' purchase rights using the
Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions for those rights granted in
1995, 1996, and 1997; dividend yield of 0.0%; an expected life ranging up to .5
years; expected volatility factor of .42, .61, and .48; and a risk free interest
rate of 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.0%. The weighted average fair value of those purchase
rights granted in March 1995, September 1995, March 1996, September 1996 and
March 1997 were $3.75, $3.59, $3.54, $5.62 and $5.93, respectively.
F-14
<PAGE> 110
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable,
single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosure, the expense amortization of the
options' fair value is allocated over the options' vesting period (4 years). The
Company's pro forma information follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pro forma net income........................... $36,957 $10,413 $2,012
</TABLE>
For pro forma disclosure in accordance with FAS No. 123, the 1996 Stock
Option Replacement offer options were treated as a modification of an award. Any
additional compensation arising from the modification is recognized over the
remaining vesting period of the new grant. FAS No. 123 is effective for options
granted by the Company commencing January 1, 1995. All options granted before
January 1, 1995 have not been valued and no pro forma compensation expense has
been recognized. However any option granted before January 1, 1995 that was
repriced in 1996 is treated as a new grant within 1996 and valued accordingly.
In addition, as compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of
the option, which is typically four years, and pro forma disclosure is only
required commencing with 1995, the initial impact on pro forma income may not be
representative of pro forma compensation expense in future years. However, upon
completion of the Merger, all options were canceled and all existing option
plans terminated.
NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal:
Current...................................... $15,998 $10,076 $3,036
Deferred..................................... 4,074 3,360 (1,949)
------- ------- ------
20,072 13,436 1,087
State:
Current...................................... 1,478 966 565
Deferred..................................... 684 636 55
------- ------- ------
2,162 1,602 620
Foreign:
Current...................................... 1,148 1,302 1,593
Deferred..................................... 36 (185) (335)
------- ------- ------
1,184 1,117 1,258
------- ------- ------
Provision for income taxes................... $23,418 $16,155 $2,965
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
The tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options reduce taxes
currently payable as shown above by $6,525,000, $3,455,000, and $397,000 in
1995, 1996 and 1997 respectively. Such benefits are credited to additional
paid-in-capital when realized.
F-15
<PAGE> 111
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
Pretax income from foreign operations was $3,901,000, $4,678,000, and
$5,309,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively.
Unremitted foreign earnings to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United
States and on which no deferred taxes have been provided, amounted to
approximately $17,500,000 at December 31, 1997. If such amounts were remitted,
the residual U.S. tax liability (net of foreign tax credits), would be
approximately $3,000,000.
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying
the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes. The sources and
tax effects of the differences are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computed expected provision.................... $23,059 $16,155 $5,189
State tax, net of federal benefit.............. 1,405 1,042 403
Tax exempt interest income..................... (710) (745) (721)
Foreign rates less than the federal rate....... (206) (791) (838)
Research and development credits............... (682) (572) (921)
Other.......................................... 552 1,066 (147)
------- ------- ------
$23,418 $16,155 $2,965
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1996 1997
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax liabilities:
Tax over book depreciation........................... $(16,046) $(18,599)
Valuation of investment portfolio.................... (57) (59)
-------- --------
(16,103) (18,658)
Deferred tax assets:
Inventory valuation adjustment and reserves.......... 4,106 4,105
Accruals not currently deductible.................... 2,297 1,975
Alternative minimum tax credits...................... -- 3,186
Prepaid expenses and other........................... 537 2,183
-------- --------
6,940 11,449
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liabilities......................... $ (9,163) $ (7,209)
======== ========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1997 the Company had alternative minimum tax credit
carryforwards of approximately $3,186,000 which may be carried forward
indefinitely.
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases certain of its facilities under noncancelable operating
leases which expire in 1998 through 2004. The Company is currently negotiating a
new office lease which will start May 1, 1998 for Campbell headquarters and
expects to have the lease signed by the end of February, 1998. The facilities
lease agreements generally provide for base rental rates which increase at
various times during the terms of the leases and also provide for renewal
options at fair market rental value.
F-16
<PAGE> 112
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
Minimum future payments under these noncancelable operating leases at
December 31, 1997 are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998........................................................ $1,390
1999........................................................ 534
2000........................................................ 418
2001........................................................ 340
2002........................................................ 280
Thereafter.................................................. 296
------
$3,258
======
</TABLE>
Total rental expense, including month-to-month rentals, was $2,732,000,
$2,778,000, and $2,875,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively.
The Company has been named as a defendant in a purported class action
lawsuit which was filed on January 23, 1998 in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California. Certain executive officers of the
Company are also named as defendants. The plaintiff purports to represent a
class of all persons who purchased the Company's Common Stock between June 30,
1997 and November 20, 1997 (the "Class Period"). The complaint alleges that the
Company and certain of its executive officers made false and misleading
statements regarding the Company that caused the market price of its Common
Stock to be "artificially inflated" during the Class Period. The complaint does
not specify the amount of damages sought. The Company believes the lawsuit lacks
merit and intends to defend it vigorously. There can be no assurance that the
Company will prevail in its defense of the lawsuit or that any judgment against
the Company will not be material.
The Company is participating in other litigation and responding to claims
arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company intends to defend itself
vigorously. The Company believes that it is unlikely that the outcome of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company, although there can
be no assurance in this regard.
NOTE 8. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in one industry segment and is primarily engaged in
the design, development, manufacturing and marketing of application specific
standard semiconductor products. The Company sells its products to system
manufacturers in a broad range of industries. During the period ending December
31, 1996 one customer, Lucent Technologies, represented 12.8% of sales or
approximately $38,000,000. No single customer accounted for more than 8.5% of
sales during the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1995.
Export sales to unaffiliated customers located outside the United States,
expressed as a percentage of consolidated sales, consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Far East................................................ 40% 42% 42%
Europe.................................................. 10 9 10
Other................................................... 7 5 7
-- -- --
57% 56% 59%
== == ==
</TABLE>
The Company's operating results are subject to the risks inherent in
international sales and purchases, including, but not limited to various
regulatory requirements, political and economic changes and disruptions,
transportation delays, foreign currency fluctuations, export/import controls,
tariff regulations, higher freight rates, difficulties in staffing and managing
foreign sales operations, greater difficulty in accounts receivable
F-17
<PAGE> 113
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 5, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
MARCH 30, 1997 AND APRIL 5, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)
collection, and potentially adverse tax consequences. Duty, tariff and freight
costs can materially increase the cost of crucial components for the Company's
products. Foreign exchange fluctuations may render the Company's products less
competitive relative to locally manufactured product offerings, or could result
in foreign exchange losses. The Company remains subject to the transaction
exposures that arise from foreign exchange movements between the dates foreign
currency export sales or purchase transactions are recorded and the dates cash
is received or payments are made in foreign currencies. There can be no
assurance that the Company's current or any future currency exchange strategy
will be successful in avoiding exchange related losses or that any of the
factors listed above will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company's operations outside the United States consist of two assembly
plants in the Philippines and sales offices in certain foreign countries.
Domestic operations are responsible for the design, development and wafer
fabrication of all products, as well as the coordination of production planning
and shipping to meet world-wide customer commitments. The Philippine assembly
plants are reimbursed in relation to value added during assembly, and the
foreign sales offices receive a commission on export sales within their
territory. Accordingly, for financial statement purposes, it is not meaningful
to segregate revenues or operating profits for the assembly and foreign sales
operations. Identifiable assets by geographic area are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1996 1997
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
United States (including corporate assets)............. $329,304 $353,224
Philippines............................................ 70,388 60,061
Other.................................................. 1,374 2,354
-------- --------
Total assets................................. $401,066 $415,639
======== ========
</TABLE>
F-18
<PAGE> 114
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
NO PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY
REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS
PROSPECTUS AND THE ACCOMPANYING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE,
SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN
AUTHORIZED BY THE ISSUER OR THE EXCHANGE AGENT. NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR THE
ACCOMPANYING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, OR BOTH TOGETHER, CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO
SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION TO
ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION. NEITHER
THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS, NOR THE ACCOMPANYING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, OR
BOTH TOGETHER, NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES,
CREATE AN IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE ISSUER
SINCE THE DATE HEREOF OR THEREOF OR THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS
CORRECT AT ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF OR THEREOF.
UNTIL OCTOBER 7, 1998 (90 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS), ALL DEALERS
EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN THE NEW NOTES, WHETHER OR NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS
DISTRIBUTION, MAY BE REQUIRED TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO
THE OBLIGATION OF THE DEALERS TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS WHEN ACTING AS
UNDERWRITERS AND WITH RESPECT TO THEIR UNSOLD ALLOTMENTS OR SUBSCRIPTIONS.
------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Available Information..................... 2
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.............................. 3
Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference............................... 3
Prospectus Summary........................ 4
Risk Factors.............................. 15
The Exchange Offer........................ 24
The Recapitalization...................... 31
New Chief Executive Officer............... 32
Texas Pacific Group....................... 32
Use of Proceeds........................... 32
Capitalization............................ 33
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Information............................. 34
Selected Consolidated Financial Data...... 35
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.............................. 37
Business.................................. 42
Management................................ 51
Description of Capital Stock.............. 57
Description of Revolving Credit
Facility................................ 59
Description of the New Notes.............. 61
Certain United States Federal Tax
Considerations.......................... 91
Plan of Distribution...................... 94
Legal Matters............................. 94
Experts................................... 94
Consolidated Financial Statements......... F-1
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
ZILOG, INC.
OFFER TO EXCHANGE
Series B 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005,
which have been registered under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended,
for
any and all outstanding
Series A 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005
PROSPECTUS
July 9, 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 115
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section 145 of the DGCL permits Zilog's board of directors to indemnify any
person against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in
connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding
in which such person is made a party by reason of his or her being or having
been a director, officer, employee or agent of Zilog, in terms sufficiently
broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities
(including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the "Act"). The statute provides that indemnification
pursuant to its provisions is not exclusive of other rights of indemnification
to which a person may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of
stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise.
Article IX of Zilog's Certificate of Incorporation provides for
indemnification of its directors, officers, employees and other agents to the
fullest extent permitted by law.
As permitted by sections 102 and 145 of the DGCL, Zilog's Certificate of
Incorporation eliminates a director's personal liability for monetary damages to
Zilog and its stockholders arising from a breach or alleged breach of a
director's fiduciary duty except for liability under section 174 of the DGCL or
liability for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to Zilog or its
stockholders, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law or for any transaction from
which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
In addition, Zilog maintains officers' and directors' insurance covering
certain labilities that may be incurred by officers and directors in the
performance of their duties.
ITEM 21. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Exhibits. A list of exhibits included as part of this Registration
Statement is set forth in the Exhibit Index which immediately precedes such
exhibits and is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules. Other than Schedule II, schedules have
been omitted since the required information is not present, or not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the
information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
ITEM 22. UNDERTAKINGS
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the
registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit
plans annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant, pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act
of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by any such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in
the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question
II-1
<PAGE> 116
of whether or not such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests for
information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to
Item 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of this form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other
equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed
subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date
of responding to the request.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a
post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the
company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and
included in the registration statement when it became effective.
II-2
<PAGE> 117
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant
has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf, hereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Campbell, State of California, on July 9, 1998.
ZILOG, INC.
By: /s/ CURTIS J. CRAWFORD
------------------------------------
Curtis J. Crawford
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities indicated, on July 9, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<C> <S>
/s/ CURTIS J. CRAWFORD President and Chief Executive Officer;
- ----------------------------------------------------- Director
Curtis J. Crawford
* Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
- ----------------------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
James M. Thorburn
* Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
William S. Price III
* Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
David M. Stanton
* Director
- -----------------------------------------------------
Carrie A. Wheeler
</TABLE>
*By: /s/ CURTIS J. CRAWFORD
-------------------------------
Curtis J. Crawford
Attorney-in-Fact
II-3
<PAGE> 118
SCHEDULE II
ZILOG, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS
BEGINNING CHARGED TO COSTS BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD AND EXPENSES DEDUCTIONS(1) END OF PERIOD
- --------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995:
Allowance for doubtful accounts............ $250 $314 $(314) $250
==== ==== ===== ====
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996:
Allowance for doubtful accounts............ $250 $107 $(107) $250
==== ==== ===== ====
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997:
Allowance for doubtful accounts............ $250 $189 $(189) $250
==== ==== ===== ====
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
II-4
<PAGE> 119
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------- -----------
<S> <C>
2.1* Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 1997,
between TPG Partners II, L.P. and Zilog, Inc. (the
"Recapitalization Agreement").
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
Schedule to the Recapitalization Agreement.
2.2* Amendment Number One to the Recapitalization Agreement,
dated as of November 18, 1997, by and between TPG Partners
II, L.P., TPG Zeus Acquisition Corporation and Zilog, Inc.
2.3* Amendment Number Two to the Recapitalization Agreement,
dated as of December 10, 1997, by and between TPG Partners
II, L.P., TPG Zeus Acquisition Corporation and Zilog, Inc.
2.4* Amendment Number Three to the Recapitalization Agreement,
dated as of January 26, 1997, by and among TPG Partners II,
L.P., TPG Zeus Acquisition Corporation and Zilog, Inc.
3.1* Certificate of Incorporation of Zilog, Inc.
3.2* Certificate of Merger of TPG Zeus Acquisition Corporation
into Zilog, Inc. filed with the Delaware Secretary of State
on February 27, 1998.
3.3* Bylaws of Zilog, Inc.
3.4* Certificate of Designations of Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock of Zilog, Inc.
4.1* Stockholders' Voting Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1997,
by and among TPG Partners II, L.P., on the one hand, and
Warburg, Pincus Capital Company, L.P. and Warburg, Pincus &
Co., on the other hand.
4.2* Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998, by
and among Zilog, Inc., TPG Partners II, L.P., TPG Investors
II, L.P., TPG Parallel II, L.P. and certain other
stockholders of Zilog, Inc.
4.3* Letter Agreement, dated as of November 18, 1997, by and
among TPG Partners II, L.P., Warburg, Pincus Capital
Company, L.P., Warburg, Pincus & Co. and Zilog, Inc.
4.4* Form of 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 of Zilog, Inc.
4.5* Indenture, dated as of February 27, 1998, by and among
Zilog, Inc., Zilog Europe, Zilog TOA Company and State
Street Bank and Trust Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Indenture.
4.6* Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 23, 1998, by and
among Zilog, Inc., Zilog Europe, Zilog TOA Company, Goldman,
Sachs & Co., BancBoston Securities Inc. and Citicorp
Securities, Inc.
4.7* Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 27,
1998, by and among Zilog, Inc., Zilog Europe, Zilog TOA
Company, Goldman, Sachs & Co., BancBoston Securities Inc.
and Citicorp Securities, Inc.
4.8* Company Security Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998,
by and between Zilog, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust
Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Company Security Agreement.
4.9* Subsidiary Security Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998
by and among each of the direct and indirect Zilog, Inc.
Subsidiary signatories thereto and State Street Bank and
Trust Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Subsidiary Security Agreement.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 120
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------- -----------
<S> <C>
4.10* Company Pledge Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998 by
and between Zilog, Inc. and State Street Bank and Trust
Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Company Pledge Agreement.
4.11* Subsidiary Pledge Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998
by each of the direct and indirect Zilog, Inc. Subsidiary
signatories thereto and State Street Bank and Trust Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Subsidiary Pledge Agreement.
4.12* Company and Subsidiary Patent and Trademark Security
Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998 by and among Zilog,
Inc., each of the direct and indirect domestic Zilog, Inc.
Subsidiary signatories thereto and State Street Bank and
Trust Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Company and Subsidiary Patent and Trademark
Security Agreement.
4.13* Copyright Security Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998
by Zilog, Inc., each of the direct and indirect Zilog, Inc.
Subsidiary signatories thereto and State Street Bank and
Trust Company.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Copyright Security Agreement.
4.14* Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of March 26, 1998, by and
among Zilog, Inc., TPG Partners II, L.P., TPG Investors II,
L.P., TPG Parallel II, L.P. and certain other stockholders
of Zilog.
5.1* Opinion of Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP regarding legality
of the New Notes.
10.1* Contract of Lease, dated March 22, 1979, by and between
Zilog Philippines, Inc. and Fruehauf Electronics Phils.
Corporation.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Contract of Lease.
10.2* Industrial Lease Agreement, dated as of March 3, 1981, by
and between M.J.H.M. Partnership II and ADDA Corporation,
and addenda 1-5 thereto, as assigned to Zilog, Inc. on
August 25, 1981 and addendum 1 thereto.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Industrial Lease Agreement.
10.3* Form of 1997 Employee Performance Incentive Plan.
10.4* 1997 Zilog Employee Performance Incentive Plan
Administrative Guide.
10.5* 1997 Zilog Employee Performance Incentive Plan Executive
Bonus Administrative Guide.
10.6* Employment Agreement, dated May 22, 1997, by and between
Michael J. Bradshaw and Zilog, Inc.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the 1997 Zilog Employee Performance Incentive
Plan Executive Bonus Administrative Guide.
10.7* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 22, 1997, by and
between Alan Secor and Zilog, Inc.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the 1997 Zilog Employee Performance Incentive
Plan Executive Bonus Administrative Guide.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 121
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------- -----------
<S> <C>
10.8* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 22, 1997, by and
between Richard L. Moore and Zilog, Inc.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the 1997 Zilog Employee Performance Incentive
Plan Executive Bonus Administrative Guide.
10.9* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 22, 1997, by and
between Thomas C. Carson and Zilog, Inc.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the 1997 Zilog Employee Performance Incentive
Plan Executive Bonus Administrative Guide.
10.10* Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998, among
Zilog, Inc., Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as arranger
and syndication agent, BankBoston, N.A., as administrative
agent and the financial institutions listed therein.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Credit Agreement.
10.11* Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of February 27, 1998, by each
of the direct and indirect Zilog, Inc. Subsidiary
signatories thereto, BankBoston, N.A. and the financial
institutions named therein.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Subsidiary Guaranty.
10.12* Collateral Account Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998,
by and between Zilog, Inc. and BankBoston, N.A. and the
financial institutions named therein.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Collateral Account Agreement.
10.13* Company Security Agreement, dated as of February 27, 1998,
by and between Zilog, Inc. and BankBoston, N.A. as
administrative agent and representative.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Company Security Agreement.
10.14* Subsidiary Security Agreement, dated as of February 27,
1998, by and among each of the direct and indirect Zilog,
Inc. Subsidiary signatories thereto and BankBoston, N.A. as
administrative agent.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Subsidiary Security Agreement.
10.15* Employment Agreement, dated as of January 5, 1998, by and
between Curtis J. Crawford and TPG Partners II, L.P.
10.16* Lease, dated as of February 18, 1998, between Zilog, Inc.
and Carramerica Realty Corporation.
NOTE: Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant hereby undertakes to
furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
schedule to the Lease.
21.1 Subsidiaries of Zilog, Inc.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors.
23.2* Consent of Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP (included in its
opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1).
25.1* Form T-1 with respect to the eligibility of State Street
Bank and Trust Company with respect to the Indenture.
27.1* Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 122
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------- -----------
<S> <C>
99.1* Form of Letter of Transmittal.
99.2* Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
99.3* Form of Letter to Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust
Companies and Other Nominees.
99.4* Form of Letter to Clients.
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* Previously filed.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF ZILOG, INC.
1. Zilog International Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation.
2. Zilog Asia Ltd., a Hong Kong company.
3. Zilog Philippines, Inc., a Philippines corporation.
4. Zilog Electronics Philippines, Inc. a Philippines corporation and wholly
owned subsidiary of Zilog Philippines, Inc.
5. Zilog Japan KK, a Japanese company.
6. Zilog UK, a United Kingdom company.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the reference of our firm under the captions "Summary
Historical and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Date," "Selected Consolidated
Financial Data" and "Experts," and to the use of our report dated February 6,
1998, except for Note 2, as to which the date is February 27, 1998, in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-4) and related Prospectus of Zilog,
Inc. for the registration of $280,000,000 of 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due
2005.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
July 7, 1998
