<PAGE>
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement [_] Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2)
or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[_] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC.
8888 BALBOA AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
-----------------
NOTICE OF THE 1995 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 12, 1995
-----------------
To the Shareholders of
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc.
The 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Maxwell Laboratories, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held on December 12, 1995 at 10:00
A.M., local time, at the La Jolla Marriott, 4240 La Jolla Village Drive, La
Jolla, California, for the following purposes, all as more fully set forth in
the accompanying Proxy Statement:
1. To elect 3 directors of the Company of Class III, to serve until the
annual meeting of shareholders in 1998 and until their successors shall
have been duly elected and qualified.
2. To consider and approve the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on October 16, 1995 as
the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote
at the meeting and any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Karl M. Samuelian
Secretary
Dated: October 31, 1995
YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING. IF YOU DO NOT EXPECT TO
ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN
IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC.
8888 BALBOA AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
_________________
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 1995 ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 12, 1995
_________________
GENERAL INFORMATION
This Proxy Statement is being mailed on or about November 1, 1995 to the
shareholders of Maxwell Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the
Board of Directors of the Company to be used at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the
Shareholders of the Company to be held on December 12, 1995 (the "Meeting") and
any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Any proxy given may be revoked at any
time prior to the exercise of the powers conferred by it by filing with the
Secretary of the Company a written notice signed by the shareholder revoking
such proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. In addition, the
powers conferred by such proxy may be suspended if the person executing the
proxy is present at the meeting and elects to vote in person. All shares
represented by each properly executed and unrevoked proxy received in time for
the Meeting will be voted (unless otherwise indicated thereon) in the manner
specified therein at the Meeting and any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The Company will pay the expenses of soliciting proxies, including the
charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding solicitation
material to beneficial owners of shares. In addition to the use of the mails,
some of the Company's directors, officers and regular employees, without extra
compensation, may solicit proxies by telegram, telephone and personal interview.
A Summary Annual Report of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31,
1995 ("fiscal 1995") is being mailed to shareholders concurrently with the
mailing of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. The Summary
Annual Report contains, among other things, summary financial information
regarding the Company and a discussion of developments in the Company's business
during fiscal 1995. In addition, there is included as an Appendix to this Proxy
Statement complete financial statements of the Company together with the report
of the Company's independent auditors thereon. The Appendix also contains
certain additional financial and related information regarding the Company.
VOTING RIGHTS
The close of business on October 16, 1995 (the "Record Date") has been fixed
by the Board of Directors as the record date for determining shareholders
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting and any adjournment or
adjournments thereof. On the Record Date, there were outstanding 2,694,974
shares of the Company's Common Stock, $.10 par value ("Common Stock"), all of
one class and all of which are entitled to be voted at the Meeting. Holders of
such issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for
each share held by them.
A majority of the outstanding shares will constitute a quorum at the meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining the
presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions
are counted in the tabulation of the votes cast on proposals presented to
stockholders, whereas broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of
determining whether a proposal has been approved.
<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth, as of August 31, 1995, certain information
concerning the beneficial ownership of the Company's equity securities of each
person known by the Company to own beneficially five percent or more of the
Company's Common Stock, the Company's only outstanding class of securities
presently entitled to vote. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of
securities, whether or not he has any economic interest therein, if he directly
or indirectly has (or shares with others) voting or investment power with
respect to the securities or has the right to acquire such beneficial ownership
within sixty days.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES
NAME OF OF COMMON STOCK PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED (1) OF CLASS
---------------- ---------------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
The TCW Group, Inc....................... 185,888 6.9%
865 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. (2)...... 167,491 6.2%
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401
The Robertson Stephens Orphan Fund (3)... 160,896 6.0%
555 California Street
Suite 2600
San Francisco, Ca. 94104
</TABLE>
- --------------------
(1) Information with respect to beneficial ownership is based on information
furnished to the Company by each shareholder included in the table or
included in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(2) Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. ("Dimensional"), a registered investment
advisor, is deemed to have beneficial ownership of 167,491 shares of the
Company's Common Stock as of June 30, 1995, all of which shares are held in
portfolios of DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., a registered open-end
investment company, or in a series of the DFA Investment Trust Company, a
Delaware Business Trust, or the DFA Group Trust and the DFA Participating
Group Trust, investment vehicles for qualified employee benefit plans, for
all of which Dimensional serves as investment manager. Dimensional
disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares. Dimensional has sole
dispositive power over all of such 167,491 shares and sole voting power
over 127,769 of such shares. Persons who are officers of Dimensional serve
as officers of open-end investment companies mentioned above and in such
capacity vote the balance of 39,722 shares.
(3) The Robertson Stephens Orphan Fund (the "Fund") beneficially owns 160,896
shares of the Company's Common Stock and has shared voting and dispositive
power over all of such 160,896 shares. Bayview Investors, Ltd., a general
partner of the Fund, Robertson, Stephens & Company Investment Management,
L.P., a general partner of the Fund and Paul H. Stephens, the Investment
Manager of the Fund are also all beneficial owners of such 160,896 shares
with shared voting and dispositive power over the shares.
2
<PAGE>
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth, as of August 31, 1995, certain information
concerning the beneficial ownership of the equity securities of the Company of
(i) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (ii) the Chief
Executive Officer and the other four most highly compensated executive officers
of the Company who earned in excess of $100,000 during fiscal 1995 and (iii)
all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
The percentages set forth in the following table as to each person's
ownership of the Company's Common Stock are based on the 2,689,185 shares
outstanding on August 31, 1995, plus any shares which may be acquired upon
exercise of stock options held by such person which are exercisable on or within
sixty days after August 31, 1995. Accordingly, the percentages are based upon
different denominators.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES
NAME AND ADDRESS OF OF COMMON STOCK PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED (1) OF CLASS
------------------- ------------------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Lewis J. Colby, Jr................................ 14,915 (2) *
Adolphe G. Gueymard............................... 17,667 (2)(3) *
Thomas B. Hayward................................. 8,824 (2) *
Henry F. Owsley................................... 10,461 (2) *
Karl M. Samuelian................................. 4,920 (4) *
Donn A. Starry.................................... 7,667 (2) *
John W. Weil...................................... 14,612 (2) *
Alan C. Kolb...................................... 77,295 (2) 2.8%
Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr................................ 45,444 (2) 1.7%
Sean M. Maloy..................................... 22,409 (2) *
Donald M. Roberts................................. 2,292 (2) *
Eduardo M. Waisman................................ 7,650 (2) *
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(15 persons).................................. 253,274 (2) 8.9%
</TABLE>
- ------------------
* Less than 1% ownership.
(1) Information with respect to beneficial ownership is based on information
furnished to the Company by each shareholder included in the table. Except
as indicated in the notes to the table, each shareholder included in the
table has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares shown
to be beneficially owned by such shareholder. The table may not reflect
limitations on voting power and investment power arising under community
property and similar laws.
(2) Includes the following numbers of shares acquirable under options which were
exercisable on or within sixty days after August 31, 1995: Alan C. Kolb,
35,452; Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr., 14,336; Sean M. Maloy, 21,988; Donald M.
Roberts, 1,500; Eduardo M. Waisman, 7,650; Messrs. Gueymard, Starry, Hayward
and Drs. Weil and Colby, 7,667 each; Mr. Owsley, 5,461; and all directors
and executive officers as a group, 142,322.
(3) Does not include 1,157 shares held of record by Mr. Gueymard's wife. Mr.
Gueymard disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
(4) Does not include 8,667 shares subject to options granted on October 24,
1995, under the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan. These options are fully
exercisable and are subject to shareholder approval of the 1995 Stock Option
Plan at the Meeting.
3
<PAGE>
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of the Company is divided into three classes, with the
terms of office of each class ending in successive years. The terms of the
three directors currently serving in Class III expire with this Annual Meeting
of Shareholders. The directors in Class I and Class II will continue in office
until their terms expire at the 1996 and 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
respectively. Each director elected in Class III at the Meeting will hold
office for a term expiring at the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until
his successor is duly elected and qualified.
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held for
each of three nominees for director in Class III. The three nominees receiving
the greatest number of votes will be elected directors of the Company in Class
III. It is intended that the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be
voted, unless otherwise instructed, for the election of the three nominees named
below. While the Company has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will
be unable to stand for election as a director, it is intended that if such an
event should occur, such shares will be voted for the remainder of the nominees
and for such substitute nominee or nominees as may be selected by the Board of
Directors.
Set forth below is certain information regarding the nominees for director
and the other directors of the Company who will continue in office for terms
extending beyond the Meeting.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS
PERIOD SERVED AS A DIRECTOR,
POSITIONS AND OTHER RELATIONSHIPS
WITH THE COMPANY, AND BUSINESS
NAME AND AGE EXPERIENCE
------------ ---------------------------------
Alan C. Kolb, 66 Dr. Kolb has been a director of the Company
(Class III) since 1970. He also served as a director from
July, 1965 to October, 1967. From 1970 until June,
1980, Dr. Kolb was President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company. He was elected Chief
Executive Officer of the Company in June, 1980 and
in August, 1992, Dr. Kolb also assumed the duties
of President of the Company. From 1980 to 1995
Dr. Kolb served as Chairman of the Board.
Karl M. Samuelian, 63 Mr. Samuelian has been a director and Secretary
(Class III) of the Company since 1967. From 1978 to June,
1980, he also held the office of Chairman of the
Board of the Company. For more than five years,
Mr. Samuelian has been a shareholder in the law
firm of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara &
Samuelian, A Professional Corporation, and a
partner in the predecessor law partnership. The
Company retained the firm of Parker, Milliken,
Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, A Professional
Corporation to provide legal services during
fiscal 1995 and said firm has been retained in the
current fiscal year.
4
<PAGE>
PERIOD SERVED AS A DIRECTOR,
POSITIONS AND OTHER RELATIONSHIPS
WITH THE COMPANY, AND BUSINESS
NAME AND AGE EXPERIENCE
------------ ---------------------------------
Thomas B. Hayward, 71 Thomas B. Hayward, U.S. Navy (Retired), is
(Class III) President of Thomas B. Hayward Associates, Inc.,
an executive consulting firm. Admiral Hayward
served as the Chief of Naval Operations of the
United States Navy from 1978 until his retirement
from active service with the Navy in July, 1982.
He is a director of Litton Industries. He was
appointed a director of the Company in October,
1987.
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
Adolphe G. Gueymard, 82 Mr. Gueymard has served as a director of the
(Class I) Company since April, 1979. For more than five
years, Mr. Gueymard has been a petroleum and
financial consultant to various business
enterprises. He also is an independent investor in
oil and gas ventures.
John W. Weil, 67 Dr. Weil has been a director of the Company since
(Class I) June, 1981. From 1974 until 1983, he was a Senior
Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of The
Bendix Corporation. For more than the past five
years, Dr. Weil's principal occupation has been as
a consultant through Weil Associates, Inc., a firm
of which he is the President and sole employee.
Dr. Weil is also a director of Access Corporation.
Sean M. Maloy, 37 Mr. Maloy has been a director of the
(Class I) Company since March, 1994. On that same date, he
assumed the duties of Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer. From 1985 to 1994, he was
Vice President - Finance and Administration and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company and from
1982 to 1985, Corporate Controller.
Lewis J. Colby, Jr., 61 Dr. Colby has been a director of the
(Class II) Company since December, 1983. He was a Senior Vice
President-Technology of Allied-Signal, Inc. from
1985 until his retirement on January 1, 1989 and
held the same position with Allied Corporation
from 1981 to 1985.
5
<PAGE>
PERIOD SERVED AS A DIRECTOR,
POSITIONS AND OTHER RELATIONSHIPS
WITH THE COMPANY, AND BUSINESS
NAME AND AGE EXPERIENCE
------------ ---------------------------------
Donn A. Starry, 70 General Starry, U.S. Army, Retired, has been a
(Class II) director of the Company since July, 1988, and was
named Chairman of the Board in October, 1995.
General Starry retired from the Army in 1983 after
forty years of active service, which included
command of the Armor Center and School at Fort
Knox, the Fifth United States Corps in U.S. Army
Europe, the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine
Command, and the United States Readiness Command.
Subsequently, he joined Ford Aerospace Corporation
where he served briefly as Vice President-Mission
Analysis and Technical Affairs and then for three
years as Vice President/General Manager of the
Space Missions Group. From January 1, 1987 until
his retirement from industry in 1990, he served as
an Executive Vice President and Special Assistant
to the Chief Executive Officer of BDM
International. A two term member of the Defense
Science Board, he is presently advisor to industry
and government in the United States and several
foreign countries on matters relating to
armor/anti-armor combat systems and command
control systems for military operations at
tactical and operational levels, and relating to
large scale command control systems at strategic
levels for military and other applications.
Henry F. Owsley, 40 Mr. Owsley is a founding partner of Gordian
(Class II) Group, L.P., a financial advisory and merchant
banking firm formed in 1988. He has served as a
director of the Company since 1991. Mr. Owsley is
also a director of Intelogic Trace, Inc.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors of the Company held a total of five regular and
special meetings during fiscal 1995. All directors except Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr.
attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (a) the total number of meetings of
the Board of Directors and (b) the total number of meetings of all committees of
the Board on which he served.
The Company has an audit committee, the function of which is to assist the
Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to corporate
accounting, auditing and reporting practices. In performing such function, the
audit committee maintains a direct line of communication with the Company's
independent auditors. The audit committee held three meetings during fiscal
1995. Its current members are Messrs. Gueymard, Hayward, Colby, Starry, Owsley
and Weil.
The Company also has a Compensation Committee which authorizes and reviews
officers' compensation. This committee held one meeting during fiscal 1995, and
its current members are Messrs.
6
<PAGE>
Samuelian, Gueymard, Hayward, Weil, Colby, Starry, and Owsley. The Company has
no nominating committee.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Each director of the Company (other than Messrs. Starry, Kolb, Maloy and
Pyatt who receive no compensation other than that received in their capacities
as officers of the Company, and Mr. Samuelian who, in addition to his
compensation as an officer of the Company, receives the meeting fee only)
receives compensation of $2,268 per quarter and $810 per Board and Committee
meeting attended ($405 per Board or Committee telephonic meeting in which such
director participates).
For serving as Chairman of the Board and as head of the committee of the
Board in charge of selecting a new President and CEO-designee, General Starry
receives, beginning October 1, 1995, $15,000 per month and will be entitled to
the sum of $100,000 upon successful completion of the selection process.
Monthly amounts paid to General Starry after six months shall be credited toward
said $100,000 payment.
Director Option Plan. The Company maintains the Maxwell Laboratories, Inc.
Director Stock Option Plan (the "Director Option Plan") which authorizes the
granting of options to purchase a maximum of 132,300 shares of the Company's
Common Stock to non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries
through the tenth anniversary of adoption of the Plan in 1989. Persons who are
non-employee incumbent directors (or directors emeritus) of the Company are the
only persons eligible to participate in the Director Option Plan.
The Director Option Plan is administered by the Board of Directors of the
Company. Under the Plan, each non-employee director automatically receives
annual grants of options to purchase 1,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock
on the first business day following the scheduled organizational meeting of the
Board of Directors of the Company, provided that any eligible director on the
date of any such annual grant who was not a member of the Board of Directors on
the date of the preceding grant of options under the Director Option Plan and
who was not an employee of the Company at any time after the date of such
preceding grant will receive an initial grant of options to purchase 3,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock.
The purchase price of shares covered by an option granted under the Director
Option Plan is the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date
of grant of the option. Each option granted under the Director Option Plan
becomes exercisable in full on the first anniversary of the date on which it was
granted, provided that no such option may be exercised after the expiration of
ten years from the date of grant. Options to purchase an aggregate of 51,463
shares have been granted to the Company's non-employee directors (and director
emeritus) under the Director Option Plan and are outstanding thereunder.
Director Stock Purchase Plan. The Company maintains the Maxwell
Laboratories, Inc., 1994 Director Stock Purchase Plan (the "Director Purchase
Plan"), under which directors, other than those who are full-time employees of
the Company, have the opportunity to purchase directly from the Company shares
of Common Stock at 100% of the public trading price of the shares. A maximum of
50,000 shares have been authorized for purchases by directors under the plan.
The Director Purchase Plan is administered by the Board of Directors and
authorizes purchases by eligible directors, in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the plan, from and after January 1, 1995, the effective date of
the plan, until the earlier of ten years thereafter or the issuance of all
shares authorized for purchase. All incumbent directors who are not employed by
the Company on a full-time basis are eligible to purchase stock under the plan.
7
<PAGE>
The purchase price of shares purchased under the plan is the closing price of
the stock on the public trading market on the day on which the Company receives
the director's request for purchase. In the event that directors seek to
purchase in the aggregate more shares than are then available for purchase under
the plan, the Company will reduce the number of shares to be purchased by the
directors in proportion to the number originally requested. Shares purchased
under the plan will be issued directly by the Company and will be without
restriction as to trading, except such restrictions as are applicable generally
to directors of public companies under the securities laws.
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S
1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Board of Directors has adopted, subject to shareholder approval, the
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "1995 Plan") which
authorizes the granting of options to purchase a maximum of 250,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock to key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries,
including officers and directors who are also employees. The principal features
of the 1995 Plan are summarized below.
REASONS FOR THE 1995 PLAN
The Board of Directors of the Company believes that the Company's ability to
grant stock options to key employees assists the Company in attracting and
retaining key employees by affording them an opportunity to acquire a
proprietary interest in the Company. The Company's principal employee stock
incentive program has been the 1985 Stock Option Plan (the "1985 Plan"), under
which, similar to the proposed 1995 Plan, options have been granted to key
employees. The term of the 1985 Plan expired on October 24, 1995, and no
options may be granted under the 1985 Plan after that date. In view of the
above factors, on October 24, 1995, the Board of Directors adopted the 1995
Plan, subject to shareholder approval, authorizing the granting to key employees
of options to purchase a maximum of 250,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PLAN
The 1995 Plan authorizes the granting during the period commencing on October
24, 1995, the date of adoption of the 1995 Plan by the Board of Directors of the
Company, and concluding on the tenth anniversary thereof, of stock options to
purchase in the aggregate 250,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. As of
the date of this Proxy Statement, options to purchase 8,667 shares have been
granted under the 1995 Plan to Karl Samuelian, Secretary of the Company, and
such options are subject to shareholder approval of the 1995 Plan at the
Meeting. The 1995 Plan provides the flexibility for the grant of options
intended to qualify as "incentive stock options" under Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and options which do not
so qualify, referred to as "non-qualified stock options."
The 1995 Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors of the Company
or, at the discretion of the Board, by a Stock Option Committee appointed by the
Board (the "Committee"). The Board of Directors of the Company has delegated
the authority to administer the 1995 Plan to the Committee. Subject to the
provisions of the 1995 Plan, the Committee has the authority to determine the
employees to whom and the times at which options are granted, the price and
terms of and the number of shares covered by each option, and with respect to
each option granted under the 1995 Plan, whether it is intended to be an
incentive stock option or a non-qualified stock option.
There are no limitations as to the minimum or maximum number of shares of
Common Stock that may be optioned to any one eligible individual. However, the
number of shares as to which incentive stock options may become exercisable by
any one individual for any calendar year is limited to a dollar
8
<PAGE>
value of $100,000 (measured by the fair market value of the shares on the date
of grant). Any options becoming exercisable in excess of such limit in any
calendar year will be non-qualified stock options.
The purchase price of shares with respect to which an option is granted under
the 1995 Plan and the terms covering payment of such purchase price are
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, but such price may not be
less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date the option is
granted, as such fair market value is determined in good faith. In the event,
however, that an incentive stock option is granted to an employee who, at the
time the option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent of the
total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any
subsidiary, the purchase price of shares with respect to which such option is
granted must be at least 110% of the fair market value of the shares on the date
of grant.
Options granted under the 1995 Plan will be exercisable in such increments
and at such times as the Committee shall specify, provided that no incentive
stock option may be exercised after the expiration of ten years from the date of
grant, or five years from the date of grant with respect to options granted to
an employee who owns more than 10% of the outstanding shares of the Company's
stock. No non-qualified stock option may be exercised more than eleven years
after the date of grant. Shares covered by the unexercised portion of any
terminated or expired option may again be subject of further options under the
1995 Plan.
Upon any exercise of an option granted under the 1995 Plan, the purchase
price of the shares purchased upon such exercise shall be paid in full (i) in
cash, (ii) by delivery to the Company of shares of its Common Stock having a
fair market value equal to the purchase price or (iii) by a combination of cash
and stock. The fair market value of shares of the Company's Common Stock
delivered in full or partial payment of the exercise price of an option will be
determined by the Committee as of the date of exercise in the same manner by
which the fair market value of shares of the Company's Common Stock is
determined on the date of grant of an option.
The Company will receive no consideration upon the grant of any option under
the 1995 Plan. Cash proceeds received by the Company from the sale of Common
Stock pursuant to the exercise of options granted under the 1995 Plan will
constitute general funds of the Company which may be used for general corporate
purposes.
Under the 1995 Plan, if an optionee's employment with the Company is
terminated for any reason, the number of shares purchasable under any option
granted thereunder held by such optionee is limited to the number of shares
which are purchasable by him at the date of such termination. If termination of
employment occurs for any reason other than such optionee's death, the option
will expire unless exercised by him within sixty days after the date of such
termination. If termination of employment occurs by reason of death, the option
will expire unless exercised by the optionee's successor within one year after
the date of death.
Options granted under the 1995 Plan are exercisable only by the optionee
during his lifetime and are not transferable except by will or the laws of
descent and distribution.
In the event of any change in the Common Stock by reason of recapitalization,
reclassification, stock split-up, combination of shares, stock dividend, or like
capital adjustment, the 1995 Plan provides that the Board of Directors shall
make appropriate adjustments in the aggregate number, class and kind of shares
available for option grants under the 1995 Plan or subject to outstanding
options thereunder and also make appropriate adjustments in the per share
exercise price of outstanding options.
In the event of the merger, consolidation or other reorganization of the
Company, or in the event of any dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the
1995 Plan provides that the Board of Directors shall elect either to (i)
appropriately adjust the number, class, kind and exercise price of shares
subject
9
<PAGE>
to all outstanding options thereunder and shares which may become subject to
options granted thereafter, or (ii) terminate the 1995 Plan and any options
theretofore granted thereunder, subject to the right of optionees under the 1995
Plan to exercise, in whole or in part (including the portions of options which
may not otherwise have been exercisable due to any insufficient passage of
time), their options during a period of not less than thirty days following
notification by the Company of the event causing such termination.
The 1995 Plan may be amended, suspended or terminated by the Board of
Directors of the Company at any time, except that no amendment, suspension or
termination may affect, without his consent, any right or obligation of an
optionee under an option theretofore granted to him, and except that no
amendment made without shareholder approval shall (i) increase the maximum
number of shares for which options may be granted (except pursuant to
adjustments of the types described above), (ii) change the provisions relating
to the expiration dates of options, (iii) change the provisions relating to the
establishment of the option price (except pursuant to adjustments of the types
described above), or (iv) change the expiration date of Plan. No options may be
granted under the 1995 Plan after its termination on October 24, 2005.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Incentive Stock Options. No federal income tax consequences result from the
grant of an incentive stock option, and generally the exercise of an incentive
stock option will not result in the recognition of income by an optionee. If an
optionee satisfies certain holding period requirements for shares acquired upon
the exercise of an incentive stock option, the full amount of his gain upon the
sale of such shares (measured by the difference between the amount of his
proceeds of sale less the exercise price) will normally be treated as long-term
capital gain. The Company will not be entitled to any deduction under such
circumstances.
Non-Qualified Options. No federal income tax consequences result from the
grant of a non-qualified stock option. Generally, an optionee will recognize
ordinary income upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option in an amount equal
to the difference between the fair market value on the date of exercise of the
shares acquired upon exercise of the option and the aggregate exercise price for
such shares. The Company will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to
the amount of ordinary income recognized by an optionee as a result of the
exercise of a non-qualified stock option.
The preceding discussion under the heading "Federal Income Tax Consequences"
is based on federal tax laws and regulations as in effect on the date of this
Proxy Statement and does not purport to be a complete description of the federal
income tax aspects of the 1995 Plan.
VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
Approval of the 1995 Plan by the shareholders of the Company will require the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present and
represented at the Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR"
APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S 1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth as to the Chief Executive Officer, and each of
the other four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who
earned more than $100,000 in fiscal 1995, information concerning compensation
for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its
10
<PAGE>
subsidiaries during each of the fiscal years ended July 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993
in which such individuals served as an executive officer.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term Compensation
Annual Compensation (1) -------------------------------------
------------------------- Other Annual Restricted Stock Option Grants All Other
Name and Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation(2) (3) Stock Award(s) (Number of Shares) Compensation (4)
- ------------------------- ---- -------- ------- ------------------- -------------- -------------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alan C. Kolb 1995 $274,806 -0- $49,731 -0- 20,000 $ 4,500
President, Chief 1994 292,015 -0- 13,266 -0- -0- 27,393
Executive Officer 1993 268,800 $25,000 4,071 -0- 10,000 40,893
and Director
Sean M. Maloy 1995 174,602 -0- -0- -0- 20,000 4,409
Executive Vice 1994 183,974 -0- -0- -0- -0- 13,865
President, Chief 1993 157,500 15,000 -0- -0- 7,000 14,756
Operating Officer
and Director
Kedar D. Pyatt 1995 171,602 -0- -0- -0- 5,000 4,182
Sr. Vice 1994 181,746 -0- 5,393 -0- -0- 10,039
President, 1993 168,000 10,000 -0- -0- 2,000 15,024
Chief Technical
Officer, and
Director
Donald M. Roberts(5) 1995 150,010 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
General Counsel 1994 46,734 -0- -0- -0- 5,000 -0-
Eduardo M. Waisman (5) 1995 141,400 -0- -0- -0- 15,000 4,242
Vice President 1994 113,175 -0- -0- -0- -0- 5,554
</TABLE>
_______________________
(1) Amounts shown include cash compensation earned and received by executive
officers as well as amounts earned but deferred at the election of those
officers under the Company's Savings Plan.
(2) Represents the amounts paid to Dr. Kolb during fiscal years 1995, 1994 and
1993 and to Dr. Pyatt during fiscal year 1994 to defray income taxes payable
by them in connection with the receipt of the supplemental retirement
annuities described below.
(3) Does not include the dollar value of certain perquisites and other personal
benefits, securities or property the recipient received as personal
benefits. Although such amounts cannot be determined precisely, the Company
has concluded that the aggregate amount thereof does not exceed as to any of
the named individuals the lesser of $50,000 and 10% of the total salary and
bonus paid to such individual for fiscal 1995.
(4) The amounts shown in this column for fiscal 1995 consist of matching
contributions made by the Company under its Savings Plan.
(5) Appointed an executive officer during fiscal 1994.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table shows information on grants of stock options pursuant to
the Company's 1985 Stock Option Plan to the four executive officers of the
Company out of the five named in the foregoing Summary Compensation Table who
received such grants in fiscal 1995. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange
Commission rules, the table also shows the value of the options granted at the
end of the ten-year option terms if the stock price were to appreciate annually
by 5% and 10% respectively. There is no assurance that the stock price will
appreciate at the rates shown in the table.
11
<PAGE>
The table also indicates that if the stock price does not appreciate, there
will be no realizable value of the options granted.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Potential Realizable
Value at Assumed
Annual Rates of
Percentage of Stock Price
Total Options Appreciation for
Granted to Exercise Option Term
Options Employees in Price Expiration ----------------------------
Name Granted (1) FY 1995 (2) (per share) Date 0% 5% 10%
---- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alan C. Kolb 20,000 17.86% $7.50 09-11-99 $-0- $41,440 $91,580
Sean M. Maloy 20,000 17.86% $7.50 09-11-99 $-0- $41,440 $91,580
Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr. 5,000 4.46% $7.50 09-11-99 $-0- $10,360 $22,890
Eduardo M. Waisman 15,000 13.39% $7.50 09-11-99 $-0- $31,080 $68,680
</TABLE>
- --------------------
(1) Such options were all granted under the Company's 1985 Stock Option Plan.
The purchase price of shares covered by such stock options may not be less
than the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock at the date of
grant. The term of each such option is ten years and the increments in
which it is exercisable are determined by the committee which administers
the 1985 Plan.
(2) Total options include options covering 7,000 shares granted to directors
under the Company's Director Stock Option Plan.
FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
Shown below is information with respect to the value of unexercised options
to purchase the Company's Common Stock held by each of the five named executive
officers of the Company and granted to them in fiscal 1995 and prior years
under the Company's 1985 Stock Option Plan, measured in terms of the closing
price of the Company's Common Stock on July 31, 1995, the last day of the
Company's fiscal year 1995. None of the five named executive officers exercised
any stock options during fiscal 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Unexercised Value of Unexercised
Options Held at In-the-Money Options at
Name July 31, 1995 July 31, 1995
- ---- ----------------------------- ----------------------------------
Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alan C. Kolb 29,452 24,200 -0- $10,000
Sean M. Maloy 15,988 22,940 $1,737 $10,000
Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr. 12,836 5,840 -0- $ 2,500
Donald M. Roberts 1,500 3,500 $ 750 $ 1,750
Eduardo M. Waisman 3,150 17,100 -0- $ 7,500
</TABLE>
The following Shareholder Return Performance Graph and the Report of the
Compensation Committee and Stock Option Committee on Executive Compensation
included in this Proxy Statement shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy
Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates
the Performance Graph or the Compensation Committee/Stock Option Committee
Report by reference therein, and shall not be deemed soliciting material or
otherwise deemed filed under either of such Acts.
12
<PAGE>
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the five year cumulative total
return to shareholders on the Company's Common Stock with the five year
cumulative total return on the NASDAQ and a peer group of comparable companies
identified therein.
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., NASDAQ, AND INDUSTRY PEER GROUP
YEAR ENDING JULY 31, 1990-1995
[PERFORMANCE GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MAXWELL
Measurement Period LABORATORIES, INDUSTRY
(Fiscal Year Covered) INC. NASDAQ PEER GROUP
- --------------------- ------------- ------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Measurement Pt- 07/31/90 $100 $100 $100
FYE 07/31/91 $128.9 $117.4 $135.7
FYE 07/31/92 $105.4 $137.4 $116.9
FYE 07/31/93 $137.0 $168.1 $161.4
FYE 07/31/94 $ 91.3 $172.7 $171.6
FYE 07/31/95 $ 85.8 $236.3 $286.5
</TABLE>
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED 7/31/90 IN MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC. COMMON
STOCK, NASDAQ, AND INDUSTRY PEER GROUP (DIVIDENDS REINVESTED)
INDUSTRY PEER GROUP INCLUDES: CALIFORNIA MICROWAVE, COHERENT, INC.,
CUBIC CORPORATION, ILC TECHNOLOGY, INC., KAMAN CORPORATION CLA, TITAN
CORPORATION, AND WATKINS-JOHNSON
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
As described in more detail below, the Company's executive compensation
consists of three principal components--base salary and annual incentive
compensation as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors and stock option awards as determined by the Stock Option Committee of
the Board of Directors.
A formal Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company was
established during fiscal year 1993 and is comprised of all directors other than
Drs. Kolb and Pyatt and Mr. Maloy. The compensation policies of the Company are
designed to set its executive compensation, including salary and short-term and
long-term incentive programs, at a level consistent with amounts paid to
executive officers of companies of similar size and marketplace orientation. In
this regard, from time to time over the last approximately ten years, the
Company has retained the services of a nationally recognized consulting firm
specializing in executive compensation issues to perform market
13
<PAGE>
analyses of competitive compensation practices for selected executive officers.
The compensation policies of the Company are also designed to link executive
officer compensation to the Company's performance in the short-term and long-
term, to reward individual achievement and to attract and retain qualified
executives.
The Company's executive compensation consists of three principal components:
(1) Base Salary. Base salary is intended to be set at a level consistent
with amounts paid to executive officers of companies of comparable size
and business areas and generally reflective of the performance of the
Company and the individual. Salaries for executive officers other than the
Chief Executive Officer are reviewed on an annual basis; the base salary
for the Chief Executive Officer is reviewed every eighteen months. In
light of the Company's disappointing loss reported in fiscal 1994, no
salary increases were instituted for the executive officers in fiscal
1995. In addition, during fiscal 1994, in a continuing effort to bring
the Company's costs in line with its business base and as a part of other
restructuring efforts in that fiscal year, the salaries of Messrs. Kolb,
Maloy and Pyatt were reduced by 10% effective in March of 1994 and such
reduction continued throughout fiscal 1995.
(2) Annual Incentive Compensation. For a number of years prior to fiscal
1995, the Company maintained a Management Incentive Bonus Plan under which
annual bonuses to executive officers were based on formulae involving
quantitative factors such as corporate and divisional profitability
compared to target levels of profitability and return on shareholders'
equity thresholds and qualitative factors such as perceived individual job
performance and achievement. In view of the uncertainty regarding
financial targets to establish for fiscal 1995, such a plan was not
established for fiscal 1995 and no bonuses were awarded in fiscal 1995 to
executive officers.
(3) Long Term Incentive Compensation/Stock Options. The Company's long-
term incentive program consists of a stock option program pursuant to
which the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers (as well as
other key employees) are periodically granted stock options at the then
fair market value of the Company's Common Stock. These options are
designed to reward and retain executive officers over the long-term and to
link the value of the incentive to increases in the Company's stock price
over time benefiting shareholders as a whole. Options granted to the
executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table during
fiscal 1995 are set forth in the table above under the caption "Option
Grants in Last Fiscal Year."
Dated: October 31, 1995.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Lewis J. Colby, Jr.
Adolphe G. Gueymard
Thomas B. Hayward
Henry F. Owsley
Karl M. Samuelian
Donn A. Starry
John W. Weil
STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE
Lewis J. Colby, Jr.
Donn A. Starry
John W. Weil
14
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During fiscal 1995, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors was
comprised of directors Colby, Gueymard, Hayward, Starry, Samuelian, Weil and
Owsley. The same directors continue to serve on the Compensation Committee at
the present time.
Mr. Samuelian is the Secretary of the Company and is a shareholder in the law
firm of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, A Professional Corporation.
The Company retained the firm of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, A
Professional Corporation to provide legal services during fiscal 1995 and said
firm has been retained in the current fiscal year.
COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO PLANS
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc. Retirement Plan. The Company maintains the
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc. Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan") which is a
tax-qualified plan under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"). Substantially all employees of the Company, including all executive
officers of the Company are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan upon
their date of hire. The annual amount of the Company's contribution is 5% of
the compensation of plan participants, unless the Board of Directors exercises
its discretion in a particular year to set a greater or lesser contribution. As
a part of the cost reduction efforts in fiscal 1994, the Board suspended
contributions to the Retirement Plan in January, 1994, and such suspension
continued throughout fiscal 1995. The Board will examine reinstatement of
contributions when the operations have achieved a minimum level of
profitability. Contributions to the Retirement Plan are allocated among the
participants based upon each participant's compensation, including any bonuses,
commissions, deferred compensation and incentive compensation, but excluding any
compensation earned in any period during which an employee was not a participant
in the Retirement Plan. After completing three years of service, participants
attain a vested right to 50% of the Company's contributions made on their
behalf. Thereafter, participants attain a vested right to contributions at the
rate of 25% for each year of service and become fully vested after five years of
service.
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc. Savings Plan. The Company maintains a savings
plan under Section 401(k) of the Code ("Savings Plan") pursuant to which plan
eligible employees of the Company (including executive officers) may elect, from
time to time, to make contributions of up to 10% of their compensation from the
Company. The Company will make a matching contribution equal to 50% of the
first 6% of compensation contributed by a participant. All employees of the
Company are eligible to participate in the Savings Plan after completing one
year of service. Subject to applicable legal limitations, amounts contributed
to the Savings Plan by a participant will not be subject to federal income tax
until distributed from the Savings Plan (at such times as distributions are
permitted or required), and the Company will be entitled to a deduction for
federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of the participant's
contribution (and Company matching contribution) under the Savings Plan.
Participant contributions to the Savings Plan, and the Company's matching
contributions, are fully vested.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN CONTROL
ARRANGEMENTS
Employment Agreements. In June 1989, the Company entered into Employment
Agreements with Alan C. Kolb and Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr. Each Employment Agreement
was originally for a term ending July 31, 1994 and provides that on February 1,
1991 and each subsequent year during the term thereof, the Board of Directors
shall determine whether to extend the term for one or more additional years.
The term of each of such Employment Agreement is currently scheduled to expire
July 31, 1996. The Employment Agreements each provide that the employee will be
required to perform the duties for the Company he was performing on the date of
the agreement, plus such other and different duties as may be mutually agreed by
the Company and the employee, and that the employee will receive as compensation
the salary and incentive bonus to which he was then entitled, as well as other
fringe
15
<PAGE>
benefits then being provided by the Company. Any future increases in the
employee's compensation, bonus and benefits will be as determined by the Board
of Directors in accordance with its normal practices.
Each Employment Agreement provides that in the event the employee's
employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause (as defined in the
agreement) or by the employee for good reason (as defined in the agreement), the
Company will generally be obligated to pay the employee a lump sum severance
payment in the amount of the present value of the salary and bonus payments
which would have been made to the employee had he continued employment during
the then remaining term of the Employment Agreement, plus the value in cash, or
the actual benefits, of the other fringe benefit programs then covering the
employee for the period of the remaining term of the Employment Agreement. If
such severance payments are determined to be "parachute payments" under Section
280G of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company is not obligated to make that
portion of such payments which, if paid, would result in some or all of such
payments not being deductible to the Company by reason of Section 280G. If the
employee's employment is terminated by the Company for cause, by the employee
for other than good reason, or by reason of disability or death, then the
Company is obligated only to pay the employee what he had accrued through the
date of termination of employment plus, in the case of disability or death, such
further benefits as may be provided under applicable fringe benefit programs of
the Company.
Severance Pay Plan. The Company adopted in June, 1989 the Maxwell
Laboratories, Inc. Special Severance Pay Plan (the "Severance Pay Plan"). Any
key employee of the Company or any subsidiary who does not have an individual
agreement with the Company providing for severance benefits is eligible to
participate in the Severance Pay Plan upon being designated as a participant by
the Board of Directors of the Company. Sean Maloy has been designated as a
participant in the Severance Pay Plan and has been designated an "Executive
Employee" thereunder.
Under the Severance Pay Plan, a participant is entitled to severance benefits
if (i) he is terminated by the Company during the two-year period following a
change in control (as defined in such Plan) of the Company (other than by virtue
of a termination for good cause, as defined in such Plan) or (ii) if he
terminates his employment with the Company during such two-year period under
circumstances constituting a constructive termination (as defined in the
Severance Pay Plan) such as a significant reduction or alteration of his
responsibilities or a reduction in his base salary. Each such terminated or
terminating employee who is not designated as an Executive Employee under the
Severance Pay Plan is entitled to a severance benefit in the amount equal to the
product of (i) his monthly compensation (as defined in the Plan) and (ii) the
number of years (up to 12 years) during which he was employed with the Company;
provided that in no event shall his severance benefit be less than six times his
monthly compensation. Each such terminated or terminating employee who is
designated as an Executive Employee under the Plan is entitled to a severance
benefit in an amount equal to the product of (i) his monthly compensation and
(ii) the number of years (up to 24 years) during which he was employed with the
Company; provided that in no event shall his severance benefit under the Plan be
less than 18 times his monthly compensation. In addition to the severance
benefit described above, upon a termination of employment under such
circumstances, a participant in the Severance Pay Plan will be entitled to
receive with respect to all outstanding stock options then held by him (whether
or not then fully exercisable), other than incentive stock options granted prior
to the effective date of the Severance Pay Plan, a cash payment in an amount
equal to the appreciation of such options, which options shall be canceled in
exchange for such payment. Severance benefits which are payable to a participant
under the Severance Pay Plan are paid to him in a lump sum, in cash, not later
than five days following the date of termination of his employment.
Certain Supplemental Retirement Annuities. The Company has extended to Drs.
Kolb and Pyatt a benefit in the form of a retirement annuity intended to
supplement the retirement benefits available under the Company's regular
retirement programs. In December, 1989, the Company entered into agreements
with each of Drs. Kolb and Pyatt to provide an annuity estimated to pay him a
benefit
16
<PAGE>
equivalent to what he would receive, on an after-tax basis, from a
standard pension plan providing a benefit of 50% (in the case of Dr. Kolb) or
40% (in the case of Dr. Pyatt) of his average compensation during his three
years of highest compensation in his last five years of employment, reduced by
his social security benefits and by the benefits provided by the Company's tax-
qualified employee benefit plans. To receive the full benefit, except in the
event of death, disability or a change in control of the Company, Dr. Kolb must
remain with the Company for 10 years from the date of his annuity agreement, and
Dr. Pyatt for 9 years from the date of his annuity agreement, after which each
may retire and begin receiving his benefit.
Each year the Company will purchase and deliver to each of Drs. Kolb and
Pyatt an annuity contract funding a pro rata portion of his eventual retirement
annuity, and the Company will also pay each of them a cash payment each year in
an amount calculated to defray the federal and state income taxes payable by
each of them as a result of the receipt of the annuity contract. Each of Dr.
Kolb's and Dr. Pyatt's eventual retirement annuity will be equal to the payments
actually made under the annuity contracts purchased for him.
The annual benefit, after taking into account qualified plans and social
security, estimated to be provided to Dr. Kolb upon completion of the funding of
his retirement annuity is $65,000, and the annual benefit estimated to be
provided to Dr. Pyatt on the same basis upon completion of the funding of his
retirement annuity is $5,000.
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Ernst & Young LLP, certified public accountants ("E&Y"), were the Company's
auditors in fiscal 1995.
The Company has engaged E&Y as its auditors for the current fiscal year;
provided, however, that if E&Y shall decline to act or otherwise become
incapable of acting, or if its engagement is otherwise terminated by the Board
of Directors (none of which events are currently anticipated), the Board of
Directors will appoint other auditors for the fiscal year.
Representatives of E&Y will be present at the meeting with an opportunity to
make a statement if they desire to do so and such representatives will be
available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders in attendance.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Shareholders may present proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement and
form of proxy to be used in connection with the 1996 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of the Company, provided such proposals are received by the Company
no later than July 5, 1996 and are otherwise in compliance with applicable laws
and regulations.
17
<PAGE>
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board of Directors does not intend to present any other business at the
meeting and knows of no other matters which will be presented at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Karl M. Samuelian
Secretary
Dated: October 31, 1995
YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING. IF YOU DO NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND
THE MEETING, PLEASE MARK, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
18
<PAGE>
APPENDIX A
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC.
FISCAL YEAR 1995 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC.
INDEX TO APPENDIX A
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.... A-2
Five-Year Selected Financial Data........................................................ A-5
Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 1995 and 1994..................................... A-6
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Years Ended July 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993........ A-7
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the Three Years Ended July 31, 1995... A-8
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended July 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993.... A-9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................... A-10
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors........................................ A-20
</TABLE>
A-1
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
During the last several years, Maxwell has been transitioning from being
primarily engaged in Government R&D activities to being a provider of
technology-based commercial products and services. In 1995, commercial sales
for the first time comprised more than half of the Company's revenues,
accounting for 57% of the total business. This transition is moving forward as
a result of a combination of external events and our internal strategy.
Externally, cutbacks in overall Defense spending are still negatively impacting
the Company and creating significant issues for management. Fiscal 1995 sales
in the primarily Defense-related technology programs and services (TPS) business
segment fell by over $10 million to $32.2 million, as discussed in the TPS
section below. Indications are that overall Defense funding will continue to
decline, and therefore reduced levels of Defense-related sales are likely for
the Company. While we believe we are approaching the level of Defense work
which could remain a stable core, the level of future Defense cutbacks and the
impact on the Company is not predictable and, therefore, previously reported
results are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected in the future.
Internally, we are managing the transition towards specific strategic objectives
and commercial markets through focused investments, primarily in three core
areas: power conversion components and systems; purification technology; and
information technology. Activities in the commercial, industrial and scientific
products (CIS) business segment reflect this focus, as highlighted in the
discussions below. At the same time, we are continually looking at our cost
structure to keep it in line with forecasted revenues. In this regard, it is
important to note that certain costs, such as facilities, have time periods for
adjustment that are longer than the recent pace of shrinkage in Defense sales.
TPS sales declined by $10.2 million, or 24%, from 1994. As mentioned, this is
attributable to reduced sales in the Company's Defense business base, primarily
related to nuclear weapons effects simulation programs. While this includes
reductions in the systems side of this business area at our Balboa division, it
also reflects an even larger reduction in the software simulation side at the S-
Cubed division. In order to offset this decline, S-Cubed is applying its
capabilities developed in Defense work to commercial networking and software
applications, which are reported in the commercial, industrial and scientific
products business segment. Fiscal 1994 TPS sales of $42.5 million decreased
from $48.5 million in 1993. This decrease also resulted primarily from Defense
cutbacks, the majority of which related to S-Cubed and our Albuquerque division,
which was in transition from a previous operations and maintenance contract to
the follow-on which runs through August 1996. Two months after fiscal 1995
year-end, the Government ceased testing at three radiation simulators which have
been operated by the Balboa division for many years. This facility close down
is part of the Government's response to perceived reduced nuclear threats and
smaller Defense budgets. The division expects to provide funded assistance in
the closure of the facilities over a two-year period, and continues to develop
technology for and operate a next generation simulator for the Government.
Overall, CIS sales were virtually flat at $42.8 million in 1995, compared to
$43.0 million in 1994. However, adjusted for the Brobeck division, which was
discontinued in January 1994, and a large, multi-million dollar turnkey
capacitor bank system at the Balboa division, which was substantially completed
in 1994, remaining CIS sales increased $5.5 million, or 15% over prior year
levels. Increased shipments of PC-based controllers for original equipment
manufacturers at the I-Bus division and commercial software sales in new
business areas at the S-Cubed operation account for most of this increase.
Currently, the new software business at S-Cubed consists primarily of two long-
term fixed price contracts, both of which are scheduled for completion next
year. Fiscal 1994 CIS sales increased by $4.6 million over the $38.4 million of
1993, with increases occurring in most operations. The largest
A-2
<PAGE>
single contributor to that increase was the previously mentioned turnkey
capacitor bank system, which has not been replaced with a similar large project
at the Balboa division.
Cost of sales as a percent of sales was 75.3%, 80.2% and 75.7% in fiscal years
1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. In the TPS business segment, cost of sales
as a percent of sales has been relatively stable, varying approximately 2.5%
over the three-year period. The percentage was slightly higher last year,
primarily due to the impact in 1994 of inventory reserves established for a
Superconducting Super Collider contract which was partially terminated for the
convenience of the government. Compared to both 1995 and 1993, the CIS cost of
sales percentage in 1994 was higher by approximately 8.7% primarily due to a $2
million write-off on an overseas capacitor contract, and the carrying costs
attributable to the Brobeck division prior to its shut down.
Internally funded research and development expenses were $5,038,000 in fiscal
1995, a 5.1% increase over the $4,794,000 of the prior year. The increase is
primarily due to greater expenditures for software development initiatives at
the S-Cubed division and new PC-based products at I-Bus. These commercial
product developments support the Company's information technology focus area,
and more than offset a reduction in research and development costs at the Balboa
operation. As a percent of total Company sales, internal research and
development expenditures for fiscal 1995, 1994 and 1993 were 6.7%, 5.6% and
6.5%, respectively.
Selling, administrative and general expenses in fiscal year 1995 were
$13,636,000, or 18.2% of sales, compared with $14,068,000 and $13,525,000, or
16.5% and 15.6% of sales for fiscal years 1994 and 1993, respectively.
Administrative expenses were $1.1 million less in the current year than in 1994,
primarily as a result of cost cutting measures implemented in the last part of
1994. In addition, one-time costs were incurred in 1994 associated with
reducing the labor force in the third and fourth quarters. Partially offsetting
the reduction in administrative costs is a $650,000 increase in sales and
marketing expenditures, primarily attributable to I-Bus. I-Bus revenues have
grown at a 28% compound rate over the last four years, and the increase in
marketing expenses at that division has been required to support such growth.
Sales and marketing expenses increased in 1994 over 1993, also in support of
commercialization efforts in new product areas, and, in conjunction with the
one-time labor force reduction costs mentioned above, resulted in the increase
in selling, general and administrative expenses in 1994 over 1993.
Interest expense increased to $315,000 in fiscal 1995, from $252,000 and
$244,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively, due to a full year of expense on a term
bank loan obtained in February 1994 in the original amount of $2.5 million,
primarily to finance building improvements for the chemical analytical services
laboratory in a Company-owned facility. The Company realized interest income,
which is included in other-net, of $358,000, $164,000 and $264,000 in fiscal
years 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The increase in interest income in
1995 is primarily attributable to interest earned on various tax refunds and
receivables. The decrease in 1994 from 1993 was primarily due to a decrease in
invested funds.
Other-net represents income of $848,000 in 1995, compared to $589,000 and
$35,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively. As described above, interest income is
included in other-net, and the increase in interest income, and to a lesser
extent the final year of expense during 1994 related to the covenant-not-to-
compete provisions of the I-Bus purchase agreement, comprise the majority of the
change in other-net in fiscal 1995. As compared to 1993, the primary reason for
the increase is the amortization into income of amounts contributed by minority
shareholders upon the organization of PurePulse Technologies (formerly Foodco)
over such shareholders' proportionate share of PurePulse's equity. This
amortization began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1993, and will continue
through April 1996. Thus, fiscal year 1995 and 1994 other-net includes
$508,000 of such income in each year, compared to $127,000 in 1993.
A-3
<PAGE>
Income tax expense was incurred at an effective rate of 3.6% in 1995, and
39.0% in 1993, while recoverable income taxes were recorded at an effective rate
of 39.0% in 1994. The 3.6% rate in the current year primarily reflects the tax-
free status of the amortized PurePulse gain, which had a less significant effect
on the tax rate in the prior two years due to the greater amount of overall
income or loss in those years. The Company has net deferred tax assets in
excess of deferred tax liabilities of $1,285,000 at July 31, 1995, and had a
loss in the prior fiscal year. The 1994 loss was partially attributable to one-
time charges related to restructuring activities and the shut-down of the
Brobeck division, and given current backlog levels at the various operating
divisions, along with possible asset sales, management believes that the
deferred tax assets are realizable.
INFLATION AND CHANGES IN PRICES
A substantial portion of the Company's business with agencies of the United
States Government consists of cost-reimbursement contracts which permit recovery
of inflation costs. Fixed-price contracts with the government and other
customers typically include estimated costs for inflation in the contract price.
Generally, the Company has been able to increase prices to offset its inflation-
related increased costs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company maintained a strong financial position with working capital of
$17.9 million, a current ratio of 2.4:1, and cash and cash equivalents of $4.1
million at July 31, 1995. In addition, the Company has available a $7.5 million
unsecured bank line of credit. Management believes that funds on hand and those
generated by future operations and available through its bank line of credit
will be sufficient to finance working capital requirements for the foreseeable
future.
A-4
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
FIVE-YEAR SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31
--------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS & RATIOS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales.............................................. $75,004 $85,463 $86,902 $90,159 $86,312
Costs and expenses................................. 74,588 88,098 85,149 96,851 82,444
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority
interest......................................... 416 (2,635) 1,753 (6,692) 3,868
Provision for income taxes......................... 15 (1,028) 683 (2,745) 1,137
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary...... 86 80 48 30 72
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss).................................. $ 315 $(1,687) $ 1,022 $(3,977) $ 2,659
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary.......................................... $ .12 $ (.63) $ .38 $ (1.50) $ 1.00
Fully diluted.................................... $ .12 $ (.63) $ .37 $ (1.50) $ .99
Cash dividends per share........................... $ .40 $ .40
Total assets....................................... $52,370 $54,322 $55,086 $59,925 $56,413
Working capital.................................... $17,855 $18,091 $20,142 $18,410 $22,976
Working capital ratio.............................. 2.37:1 2.31:1 2.49:1 2.02:1 3.24:1
Long-term debt..................................... $ 1,928 $ 2,797 $ 1,515 $ 2,538 $ 1,710
Shareholders' equity at year-end................... $35,364 $34,960 $36,645 $35,456 $40,164
Shares outstanding at year-end..................... 2,689 2,675 2,675 2,656 2,636
Book value per share at year-end.................. $ 13.15 $ 13.07 $ 13.70 $ 13.35 $ 15.24
</TABLE>
A-5
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JULY 31
-----------------
1995 1994
------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents...................................................... $ 4,053 $ 4,579
Accounts receivable:
Trade and other, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$545 in 1995 and $530 in 1994............................................... 9,589 9,883
Long-term contracts -- Note 2................................................ 6,441 6,140
------- -------
16,030 16,023
Inventories and inventoried costs relating to long-term contracts -- Note 12... 7,239 7,608
Recoverable income taxes....................................................... 861 64
Prepaid expenses............................................................... 572 512
Deferred income taxes.......................................................... 2,090 3,135
------- -------
Total Current Assets........................................................ 30,845 31,921
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization -- Note 12........................................................ 20,315 20,981
Deposits and Other.............................................................. 1,210 1,420
------- -------
$52,370 $54,322
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable............................................................... $ 9,400 $ 9,925
Accrued employee compensation.................................................. 2,681 2,936
Current portion of long-term debt.............................................. 909 969
------- -------
Total Current Liabilities................................................... 12,990 13,830
Long-Term Debt -- Note 3........................................................ 1,928 2,797
Deferred Income Taxes........................................................... 805 1,030
Minority Interest and Additional Amounts Contributed............................ 1,283 1,705
Commitments & Contingencies -- Notes 6 & 10
Shareholders' Equity -- Note 4
Common Stock, $.10 par value
Authorized 5,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding: 1995 -- 2,689,185 shares;
1994 -- 2,674,973 shares................................................... 269 267
Additional paid-in capital.................................................... 18,889 18,802
Retained earnings............................................................. 16,206 15,891
------- -------
35,364 34,960
------- -------
$52,370 $54,322
======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
A-6
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31
------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- ----------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales...................................................... $75,004 $85,463 $86,902
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales............................................. 56,447 68,555 65,765
Selling, administrative and general expenses.............. 13,636 14,068 13,525
Research and development expenses......................... 5,038 4,794 5,650
Loss on closing of Brobeck division....................... 1,018
Interest expense........................................... 315 252 244
Other-net -- Note 12....................................... (848) (589) (35)
------- ------- -------
74,588 88,098 85,149
------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest... 416 (2,635) 1,753
Provision for income taxes -- Note 5....................... 15 (1,028) 683
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary.............. 86 80 48
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)......................................... $ 315 $(1,687) $ 1,022
======= ======= =======
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary................................................... $ .12 $ (.63) $ .38
======= ======= =======
Fully Diluted............................................. $ .12 $ (.63) $ .37
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
A-7
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1995
---------------------------------------
COMMON ADDITIONAL RETAINED
STOCK PAID-IN CAPITAL EARNINGS
-------- --------------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at August 1, 1992..................................... $241 $15,902 $19,313
Issuance of 18,580 shares under stock option plan
including related tax benefit.............................. 2 165
Issuance of 126,742 shares due to 5 percent stock dividend... 12 1,376 (1,388)
Net income for the year...................................... 1,022
---- ------- -------
Balance at July 31, 1993...................................... 255 17,443 18,947
Issuance of 580 shares under stock option plan
including related tax benefit.............................. 4
Issuance of 127,185 shares due to 5 percent stock dividend... 12 1,355 (1,369)
Net loss for the year........................................ (1,687)
---- ------- -------
Balance at July 31, 1994...................................... 267 18,802 15,891
Issuance of 14,212 shares under stock purchase plan.......... 2 87
Net income for the year...................................... 315
---- ------- -------
Balance at July 31, 1995...................................... $269 $18,889 $16,206
==== ======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
A-8
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JULY 31
------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)....................................... $ 315 $(1,687) $ 1,022
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization....................... 2,907 3,275 4,173
Provision for losses on accounts receivable......... 45 310 28
Loss on sales of property and equipment............. 122 154 12
Deferred income taxes............................... 820 (970) 1,715
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary....... 86 80 48
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable................................ (52) 266 980
Inventories........................................ 369 876 (1,434)
Prepaid expenses and other......................... 150 (225) 124
Accounts payable................................... (525) 1,152 (3,172)
Accrued employee compensation...................... (255) (812) (266)
Income taxes payable/recoverable................... (797) 914 (903)
------- ------- -------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities....... 3,185 3,333 2,327
Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment.............. (2,951) (4,662) (2,728)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment........... 80 26 14
------- ------- -------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities........... (2,871) (4,636) (2,714)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from long-term borrowing........................ 2,500
Principal payments on long-term debt..................... (929) (1,271) (1,370)
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock................... 89 4 167
Dividends paid........................................... (2)
------- ------- -------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing
Activities.................................... (840) 1,231 (1,203)
------- ------- -------
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents........... (526) (72) (1,590)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.. 4,579 4,651 6,241
------- ------- -------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year................. $ 4,053 $ 4,579 $ 4,651
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
A-9
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation and Minority Interest Amounts
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Maxwell
Laboratories, Inc., and its majority-owned subsidiary, PurePulse Technologies,
Inc. (formerly Foodco Corporation). All significant intercompany transactions
and account balances are eliminated in consolidation. The amount contributed by
minority shareholders in excess of their proportionate share of the subsidiary's
equity has been included with minority interest. Such amount is being amortized
into income over the three-year period commencing with the commercialization and
license agreement entered into by PurePulse Technologies in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 1993. The formation of PurePulse Technologies and its sale of stock,
which occurred in fiscal 1989, were non-taxable transactions, and therefore no
deferred income taxes have been provided on the recognized gain.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out
method) or market.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and
amortization are provided under the straight-line method in amounts sufficient
to amortize the cost of the depreciable assets over their estimated useful
lives. Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment amounted
to $3,415,000 in 1995, $3,783,000 in 1994, and $4,300,000 in 1993.
In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No.
121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of, effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 1995. The new Statement requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-
lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and
the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less
than the assets' carrying amount. Statement 121 also addresses the accounting
for long-lived assets that are expected to be disposed of. When events or
circumstances indicate that an impairment might exist, assets will be reviewed
for impairment at the appropriate asset group level. Any impairment losses
identified will be measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its
carrying amount. While certain assets held by the company are expected to be
subject to Statement No. 121 consideration, the company has not yet analyzed the
impact of the adoption of the new Statement. Management anticipates adopting
the new Statement in the first quarter of fiscal 1997 in accordance with the
Statement's applicable transition provisions, at which time an assessment of
long-lived asset impairment will be made based upon then current circumstances
and applicable estimated future cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
Sales include costs as incurred and fees as earned on cost-plus-fee contracts,
as well as costs incurred and estimated profits on long-term fixed-price
contracts. Such estimated profits have been computed by applying the various
percentages of completion of the contracts to the estimated ultimate profits.
Revenues from the sale of manufactured products are recorded when the products
are shipped. Provisions are made on a current basis to fully recognize any
anticipated losses on contracts.
A-10
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The computation of earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average
shares of Common Stock outstanding plus the dilutive effects of Common Stock
equivalents arising from stock options. The average number of Common and Common
equivalent shares outstanding was 2,678,000 in 1995, 2,675,000 in 1994, and
2,684,000 in 1993. The average number of shares used to compute earnings (loss)
per share, assuming full dilution, was 2,683,000 in 1995, 2,675,000 in 1994, and
2,718,000 in 1993.
Cash Equivalents
The company classifies all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three
months or less when purchased as cash equivalents.
NOTE 2 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The following tabulation shows the component elements of accounts receivable
from long-term contracts at July 31, 1995 and 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
------ -------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
U.S. Government:
Amounts billed............................... $2,331 $3,555
Amounts unbilled............................. 1,005 1,007
Retainage due upon completion of contracts... 434 563
Commercial customers:
Amounts billed............................... 657 570
Amounts unbilled............................. 2,014 445
------ ------
$6,441 $6,140
====== ======
</TABLE>
The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to retainage provisions
under long-term contracts will be due upon completion of the contracts and
acceptance by the customers. Substantially all retention balances and unbilled
receivables at July 31, 1995, are expected to become due and payable within the
next year.
NOTE 3 - LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS
Long-term debt at July 31 consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
------ ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Variable rate note payable to a bank, due $42,000
monthly plus interest............................................ $1,792 $2,250
7.75% fixed rate note payable to a bank, due $100,000 quarterly
plus interest.................................................... 800 1,200
10.0% fixed rate promissory note, due $3,000 monthly.............. 245 254
Other notes payable............................................... -- 62
------ ------
2,837 3,766
Less current portion.............................................. 909 969
------ ------
$1,928 $2,797
====== ======
</TABLE>
A-11
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3 - LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The variable rate note bears interest at the bank's prime rate plus 1/2%, and
at July 31, 1995, this rate was 9.25%. Both bank notes are unsecured, and
contain certain restrictive covenants relating to net-worth, net-worth-ratio and
quarterly operating results. The consideration of future cash dividends, if
any, could be limited by certain of these bank covenants.
Maturities of long-term debt for each of the five years ending July 31, 2000
are: 1996 - $909,000; 1997 - $910,000; 1998 - $512,000; 1999 - $305,000; and
2000 - $14,000.
Under an unsecured annual revolving bank line of credit agreement, the company
may borrow up to $7.5 million at the bank's prime rate. At July 31, 1995, there
were no outstanding borrowings under this credit arrangement.
Under certain contracts, the company is required to maintain letters of credit
during the period of contract performance. There were no such outstanding
letters of credit at July 31, 1995. At July 31, 1994, outstanding letters of
credit totaled $271,000.
NOTE 4 - STOCK PLANS
Stock Option Plans
The company's 1985 and 1989 Stock Option Plans provide for granting either
Incentive Stock Options or Non-Qualified Stock Options to employees and non-
employee members of the company's Board of Directors, respectively. The
options granted under these plans are to purchase Common Stock at not less than
fair market value at the date of grant. Employee options are exercisable in
cumulative annual installments of 30 percent or 20 percent, while options in the
Director Option Plan are exercisable in full one year after date of grant. All
options have terms of five to ten years. The following table summarizes stock
option activity for the three years ended July 31, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER PRICE
OF SHARES PER SHARE
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at August 1, 1992... 394,415 $ 7.70 to $17.70
Granted........................ 121,643 $10.32 to $10.71
Exercised...................... (18,580) $ 7.70 to $ 7.99
Expired or forfeited........... (89,227) $ 7.70 to $17.70
-------- ------ -- ------
Outstanding at July 31, 1993.... 408,251 $ 7.70 to $13.15
Granted........................ 17,600 $ 7.50 to $10.24
Exercised...................... (580) $ 7.70
Expired or forfeited........... (39,392) $ 7.70 to $12.92
-------- ------ -- ------
Outstanding at July 31, 1994.... 385,879 $ 7.50 to $13.15
Granted....................... 112,000 $ 7.50 to $ 8.00
Exercised..................... --
Expired or forfeited.......... (139,007) $ 7.70 to $12.92
-------- ------ -- ------
Outstanding at July 31, 1995.... 358,872 $ 7.50 to $13.15
======== ====== == ======
</TABLE>
The average price of all options outstanding at July 31, 1995, is $9.66 per
share; the outstanding options expire at various dates through December 2004. At
July 31, 1995, options for 199,000 shares of Common Stock are exercisable at
$7.50 to $13.15 per share and 184,000 shares are available for future grant.
A-12
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4 - STOCK PLANS (CONTINUED)
Stock Purchase Plans
In December 1994, the company established an Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
a Director Stock Purchase Plan, under which a total of 250,000 shares of Common
Stock were reserved for issuance. The employee plan permits substantially all
employees to purchase Common Stock through payroll deductions at 85% of the
lower of the trading price of the Stock at the beginning or at the end of each
six-month offering period. The director plan permits non-employee directors to
purchase Common Stock at 100% of the trading price of the Stock on the date a
request for purchase is received. In fiscal year 1995, 14,000 shares were
issued under the two plans for an aggregate of $89,000. At July 31, 1995,
236,000 shares are reserved for future purchases.
Stockholder Rights Plan
In 1989, the company adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan, and subsequently
distributed one nonvoting Common Stock purchase right (Right) for each
outstanding share of Common Stock. The Rights are not exercisable and will not
trade separately from the Common Stock unless a person or group acquires, or
makes a tender offer for, 20% or more of the company's Common Stock. Initially,
each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase one-half of a share of
company Common Stock at a price of $32.50 per one-half share, subject to certain
anti-dilution adjustments. The Rights expire on June 20, 1999.
If the Rights become exercisable and certain conditions are met, then each
Right not owned by the acquiring person or group will entitle its holder to
receive, upon exercise, company Common Stock having a market value of four times
the exercise price of the Right. These provisions will not apply if a majority
of the Board of Directors determines that the acquisition or other business
combination is in the best interest of the shareholders. In addition, the
company may redeem the Rights at a price of $.01 per Right, subject to certain
restrictions.
A-13
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES
Income taxes (credit) are as follows for the years ended July 31, 1995, 1994,
and 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
------ -------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal:
Current..... $(634) $ 15 $ (912)
Deferred.... 604 (935) 1,420
----- ------- ------
(30) (920) 508
State:
Current..... (171) (73) (120)
Deferred.... 216 (35) 295
----- ------- ------
45 (108) 175
----- ------- ------
$ 15 $(1,028) $ 683
===== ======= ======
</TABLE>
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The primary components
of the company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Uniform capitalization, contract and
inventory-related reserves............................................................ $ 723 $ 1,578
Accrued vacation........................................................................ 551 619
Environmental and other reserves........................................................ 495 534
Allowance for doubtful accounts......................................................... 217 213
Other................................................................................... 239 337
State NOL carryforward.................................................................. 300 200
Valuation allowance..................................................................... (300) (200)
------ -------
Net deferred tax assets............................................................... $2,225 $ 3,281
====== =======
Deferred tax liabilities:
Tax over book depreciation.............................................................. $ 802 $ 1,023
Deferred contract income recognition.................................................... 134 148
Other................................................................................... 4 5
------ -------
Total deferred tax liabilities........................................................ $ 940 $ 1,176
====== =======
</TABLE>
The effective income tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax
rate as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
------ ------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statutory federal income tax rate......................................................... 34.0% (34.0)% 34.0%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit............................................ 7.3 (2.7) 6.6
Amortization of minority interest......................................................... (41.5) (6.6) (2.5)
Other items............................................................................... 3.8 4.3 0.9
------ ------- ----
Effective income tax rate................................................................. 3.6% (39.0)% 39.0%
====== ======= ====
</TABLE>
A-14
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6 - LEASES
Rental expense amounted to $2,110,000, $2,343,000, and $2,140,000 in 1995,
1994, and 1993, respectively, and was incurred primarily for building rental.
Future minimum rental commitments as of July 31, 1995, are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1996......... $1,424
1997......... 1,221
1998......... 1,213
1999......... 1,102
2000......... 940
Thereafter... 3,630
------
$9,530
======
</TABLE>
Certain leases include renewal options for periods ranging from one to twenty-
five years and are subject to rental adjustment based on consumer price indexes.
Substantially all leases provide that the company pay for property taxes,
insurance, and repairs and maintenance.
NOTE 7 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Retirement Plan
Substantially all employees are covered under the company's defined
contribution retirement plan. Prior to 1994, company contributions under the
plan were based on 5% of defined compensation for covered employees. Effective
January 1, 1994, the company suspended contributions to the plan. There were no
contributions made during the year ended July 31, 1995; however, contributions
are expected to resume at an unspecified future date at the discretion of the
Board of Directors. Contributions aggregated $550,000 and $1,052,000 for the
years ended July 31, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
Savings Plan
Substantially all employees are eligible to elect coverage under a
contributory employee savings plan which provides for company matching
contributions based on one-half of employee contributions up to certain plan
limits. The company's matching contributions under this plan totaled $568,000,
$611,000, and $707,000 for the years ended July 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993,
respectively.
NOTE 8 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Karl M. Samuelian, a member of the Board of Directors of the company, is a
shareholder in the law firm of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, A
Professional Corporation, Outside General Counsel to the company. During the
years ended July 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, the company incurred legal fees for
services amounting to $66,000, $328,000, and $478,000, respectively, to Parker,
Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian.
NOTE 9 - LOSSES, RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
In the second and fourth quarters of fiscal 1994, the company recorded $3
million of pre-tax charges. A $1 million charge in the second quarter resulted
from the closing of the Brobeck division. Approximately $2 million of charges
were provided in the fourth quarter to recognize anticipated losses on contracts
and to provide for inventory and work force reduction costs. The majority of
this amount was related to an overseas contract for customized capacitors which
was terminated shortly after July 31, 1994.
A-15
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 10 - ENVIRONMENTAL MATTER
In January 1991, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, or
DTSC, notified the company that it had been identified as one of a number of
"potentially responsible parties" with respect to alleged hazardous substances
released into the environment at a recycling facility in San Diego County. As
Maxwell is not in the business of transporting or disposing of waste materials,
the company retained the services of the owners of the recycling facility to
transport certain waste material generated by Maxwell. After properly delivering
the materials to the transporter, Maxwell was not further involved in the
transportation, treatment or disposal of the materials. Under California and
Federal "Superfund" laws, Maxwell is a potentially responsible party even though
it was not involved in the transport or disposal of the substances. Moreover,
it is the company's understanding that alleged hazardous substances from at
least approximately 160 other potentially responsible parties were released at
the facility, and that response costs of approximately $7.9 million have been
incurred at the site by the DTSC.
In 1992, the company and approximately 40 other potentially responsible
parties signed a consent order with the State of California. The parties which
signed the consent order have agreed to reimburse the State for $4 million of
the $7.9 million response costs previously incurred, and to pay for certain
future site investigations and interim response actions outlined in the consent
order. The currently estimated cost of such activities is $9.1 million, and the
company's share of the cost, as allocated by the parties to the consent order,
is currently estimated at approximately 7.0%. The eventual cost of all removal
and remediation activities, for which the company and the other potentially
responsible parties will share in additional reimbursements to the State, and
including the $9.1 million referred to above, is currently estimated to be in
the range of $15 - $20 million. About half of such amount will consist of
maintenance and monitoring costs to be incurred over a 25-30 year period. The
company has accrued its share of such estimated costs; on the basis of amounts
accrued by the company, it is management's opinion that any additional liability
resulting from this situation will not have a material effect on the company's
financial statements.
NOTE 11 - BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The company is engaged in research, development, and manufacturing activities
related to sales of defense, scientific, commercial, and industrial products,
programs, and services. For purposes of analyzing and understanding the
financial statements, the company's operations have been classified into the
following industry segments:
Technology Programs and Services (TPS)
TPS consists of the business associated with scientific research and
development, primarily performed for agencies of the U.S. Government. Included
in this segment are scientific research and studies as well as large hardware
design, development, and manufacture, and the operation of test facilities.
Commercial, Industrial and Scientific Products (CIS)
CIS consists of the manufacture and sale of products, many of which have
evolved from or employ technology developed through the company's technology
programs and internally funded research and development.
A-16
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 11 - BUSINESS SEGMENTS (CONTINUED)
Business segment financial data for the three years ended July 31, is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- ---------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales:
Technology programs and services........................... $32,242 $42,449 $48,483
Commercial, industrial and scientific products............. 42,762 43,014 38,419
------- ------- -------
Consolidated total........................................ $75,004 $85,463 $86,902
======= ======= =======
Operating profit (loss):
Technology programs and services........................... $ 1,154 $ 1,609 $ 2,934
Commercial, industrial and scientific products............. 1,025 (872) 1,572
------- ------- -------
Total operating profit.................................... 2,179 737 4,506
Corporate expenses and revenues............................ (1,448) (3,120) (2,509)
Interest expense........................................... (315) (252) (244)
------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest $ 416 $(2,635) $ 1,753
======= ======= =======
Identifiable assets:
Technology programs and services........................... $16,463 $19,014 $21,589
Commercial, industrial and scientific products............. 22,403 20,796 19,164
Corporate.................................................. 13,504 14,512 14,333
------- ------- -------
Consolidated total........................................ $52,370 $54,322 $55,086
======= ======= =======
Depreciation and amortization:
Technology programs and services........................... $ 2,067 $ 2,311 $ 2,722
Commercial, industrial and scientific products............. 1,269 1,394 1,464
Corporate.................................................. 79 78 114
------- ------- -------
Consolidated total........................................ $ 3,415 $ 3,783 $ 4,300
======= ======= =======
Capital expenditures:
Technology programs and services........................... $ 1,248 $ 3,115 $ 1,770
Commercial, industrial and scientific products............. 1,605 1,424 897
Corporate.................................................. 98 123 61
------- ------- -------
Consolidated total........................................ $ 2,951 $ 4,662 $ 2,728
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Intersegment sales are insignificant. Operating profit (loss) is sales less
cost of sales and operating expenses, excluding interest expense and corporate
expenses and revenues. Corporate expenses in 1994 include a $1,018,000 loss on
closing the Brobeck division. Identifiable assets by segment include the assets
directly identified with those segments. Corporate assets consist primarily of
cash and cash equivalents, deferred income taxes and facilities and land.
Sales under U.S. Government contracts and subcontracts are primarily in the
TPS business segment, and aggregated $32,120,000, $45,971,000, and $50,711,000
in 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.
Export sales amounted to $7,318,000, $9,784,000, and $7,439,000 in 1995, 1994,
and 1993, respectively, principally to countries in Europe and the Pacific Rim.
A-17
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 12 - SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Inventories and inventoried costs relating to long-term contracts are
classified as follows at July 31, 1995 and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
------- -------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods..................................................................... $ 1,181 $ 1,052
Reimbursable research and development.............................................. 81 453
Work in process.................................................................... 2,211 1,985
Raw materials and purchased parts.................................................. 3,766 4,118
------- -------
$ 7,239 $ 7,608
======= =======
</TABLE>
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at July 31, 1995 and
1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
------- -------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Land and land improvements......................................................... $ 3,780 $ 3,780
Buildings and building improvements................................................ 11,182 10,563
Machinery and equipment............................................................ 30,006 28,122
Office furniture and equipment..................................................... 6,777 6,490
Leasehold improvements............................................................. 3,517 4,503
------- -------
55,262 53,458
Less allowances for depreciation and amortization.................................. 35,633 33,606
------- -------
19,629 19,852
Construction in progress........................................................... 686 1,129
------- -------
$20,315 $20,981
======= =======
</TABLE>
Included in Other-net is the amortization into income over a three-year period
of amounts contributed by minority shareholders upon the organization of
PurePulse Technologies over such shareholders' proportionate share of PurePulse
Technologies' equity. This amortization began in the fourth quarter of fiscal
1993, and amounts to $508,000 each year in 1995 and 1994, and $127,000 in 1993.
Also included in Other-net is interest income of $358,000, $164,000, and
$264,000 during the years ended July 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.
Financial instruments which subject the company to potential concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of investments in cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. The company invests its excess cash with major corporate and
financial institutions and in U.S. Government backed securities. The company has
established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities to maintain
safety and liquidity, and has not experienced any losses on these investments.
The company's accounts receivable result from contracts with the U.S.
Government, as well as contract and product sales to non-government customers in
various industries. The company performs on-going credit evaluations of
selected non-government customers and generally requires no collateral.
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information consists of the following
payments of interest and recovery of income taxes for the three years ended July
31, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
----- ----- -----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest................ $ 315 $ 252 $ 244
Income taxes refunded... $ 11 $ 998 $ 153
</TABLE>
A-18
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 13 - QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND STOCK INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations and Common
Stock price ranges for the years ended July 31, 1995 and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------------------------------------
OCTOBER 31 JANUARY 31 APRIL 30 JULY 31
---------- ------------- ------------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1995
Sales........................ $ 17,918 $ 17,630 $ 17,468 $ 21,988
Gross profit................. 4,972 4,584 3,785 5,216
Net income (loss)............ 323 237 (464) 219
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary..................... .12 .09 (.17) .08
Fully diluted............... .12 .09 (.17) .08
Common Stock price range:
High........................ 9 8 1/4 9 9
Low......................... 7 6 3/4 6 1/2 6 5/8
1994
Sales........................ $ 20,593 $ 20,142 $ 22,480 $ 22,248
Gross profit................. 4,321 4,325 5,191 3,071
Net income (loss)............ 11 (694) 320 (1,324)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary..................... -- (.26) .12 (.49)
Fully diluted............... -- (.26) .12 (.49)
Common Stock price range:
High........................ 14 5/8 13 3/4 10 3/8 10
Low......................... 8 3/4 9 1/4 7 1/2 7
</TABLE>
Note 9 of the financial statements contains a description of items which
occurred in the second and fourth quarters of fiscal year 1994, resulting in
losses in those quarters.
The company's Common Stock is traded in the NASDAQ National Market System
under the symbol MXWL. High and low stock prices reflect closing quotations.
The closing price for the company's stock on October 20, 1995, was $10.50.
As of October 1, 1995, there were 518 record holders of the company's Common
Stock. The company declared no dividends in fiscal 1995, but distributed a 5%
stock dividend during the second quarter of fiscal years 1994 and 1993, and has
on occasion paid cash dividends within the last five fiscal years. The Board of
Directors may consider future year-end cash dividends depending on the company's
cash and other requirements at such time.
A-19
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Maxwell
Laboratories, Inc., and subsidiary as of July 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended July 31, 1995. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Maxwell
Laboratories, Inc., and subsidiary at July 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended July 31, 1995, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
September 28, 1995
A-20
<PAGE>
MAXWELL
MAXWELL'S STRATEGIC
DIRECTION: FOCUSING
CORE CAPABILITIES ON
MAJOR MARKETS.
1995
SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT
<PAGE>
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc., based in San Diego, is an advanced scientific and
computer-based information systems and services company. Maxwell is recognized
as a leading developer and manufacturer of high-energy pulsed-power components
and systems for defense and commercial markets such as food processing and
packaging, mining, health care, and transportation. The Company also designs and
manufactures integrated PC systems for real-time commercial and industrial
applications.
<PAGE>
TO OUR
SHAREHOLDERS
Despite fluctuations in quarterly results during the past year, Maxwell
Laboratories was able to post a net profit for 1995. We were particularly
pleased by a strong performance in the fourth quarter.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
For the year ended July 31, 1995, total sales were $75,004,000, compared to
$85,463,000 in 1994. The Company had a net profit of $315,000, or $0.12 a
share, compared to a net loss of $1,687,000, or $0.63 a share, last year.
Commercial sales in 1995 were 57% of total sales, up from 46% of
Company sales in the prior year.
OPERATIONS
Although sales declined in 1995, the Company experienced steady improvement
in its efforts to stabilize revenue and generate income that can
provide a base for growth in new markets. Several operations contributed
significantly to income in 1995. Most noteworthy:
. I-Bus division, a leader in integrated PC systems for real-time industrial
and commercial applications, made impressive gains in sales and earnings.
Since being acquired by Maxwell in 1991, I-Bus has grown at an annual
compound rate of 28%.
. Although contract R&D business, largely defense oriented, has declined
sharply, Maxwell's contract R&D still generated approximately $30 million in
1995 sales.
. Finally, PurePulse Technologies, still a relatively small operation, made a
meaningful contribution to profits in 1995.
Additionally, there has been progress in emerging areas such as mining,
ultracapacitors for electric vehicles, and information systems for educational
and state/local government markets.
Operations and emerging technologies are discussed in more detail in the
Question and Answer portion of the annual report which follows this letter.
MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLAN
On September 19, 1995, the Company announced adoption of Maxwell's Executive
Management Succession Plan. As a first step, effective October 1, 1995, Dr.
Alan C. Kolb relinquished the position of Chairman of the Board to Donn A.
Starry, a member of the Board since 1988. The next step in the transition
process will be the establishment of a search committee, chaired by Donn
Starry, to select the next President, CEO-Designee.
OUTLOOK
Over the past three years, Maxwell Laboratories has undergone an extensive
restructuring and redirection of its priorities in order to accommodate the
declining defense market and take advantage of exciting new technology
applications in commercial markets. We believe that the company is now
positioned to realize profitable growth in several new commercial businesses.
As we enter 1996, our redirection efforts should produce the results we
anticipated at their inception. We look forward to improved revenues and gains
in earnings in 1996 and succeeding years.
We thank you for your support.
[Donn A. Starry's Picture appears here]
Donn A. Starry
Chairman of the Board
[Alan C. Kolb, Ph.D.'s Picture appears here]
Alan C. Kolb, Ph.D.
President and
Chief Executive Officer
1
<PAGE>
[PHOTO PAGE -- Text Continues on Page 3.]
GOVERNMENT
R & D PROGRAMS
Innovative technologies originally developed under government contracts to meet
the country's critical defense needs have led to a number of new applications
with promising commercial potential.
Over the past 25 years
Maxwell Laboratories has
made major investments in
professional skills and ex-
perience to address the
challenges of a wide variety
of complex government
R & D programs and to
move its technologies into
the commercial marketplace.
[PICTURE APPEARS HERE]
Reviewing milestone achievements
on a joint S-Cubed / Balboa program
are, left to right: Gary Jongeward,
Arne Kalma, Karin Robertson,
Larry Longden, Roger White,
and Jeff Stevens.
Government R&D
contracts today provide
more than one-third of
the Company's sales.
Research and development
programs are spread
throughout the Company,
involving pulsed-power
research at Maxwell's
Albuquerque division,
hardware and testing
programs at the Balboa
division, and research
and testing at
S-Cubed.
2
<PAGE>
In the following Question and Answer portion of this year's annual report, Dr.
Alan C. Kolb, President and Chief Executive Officer of Maxwell Laboratories,
responds to the most frequent and typical investor questions regarding the
Company's business, strategic direction, current operations, and outlook.
Q
For the past five years, the Company has been in transition--working to
develop promising new commercial products and services. It appears that
Maxwell is still in that transition period. Why is this taking so long?
A
The process of change from defense to commercial markets can best be
understood by events of the last five years. Because of the rapidity with
which the perceived "Cold War" threat diminished, U.S. defense budgets have
declined much more rapidly than anyone could have predicted five years ago.
For example, Maxwell's defense business declined from $65 million to $30
million in that five-year period. While the $30 million is not insignificant,
decreased sales and lesser profits mean fewer resources available to
commercialize our core technologies.
With government established programs, contractors are paid to meet
prescribed goals and paid a fee for achieving those goals. Products and
services for the commercial marketplace, by contrast, are developed from, or
funded by, internal financing or by agreements with strategic business
partners. As a consequence, financial limits determine how quickly commercial
products can be developed and marketed. Despite this constraint, Maxwell's
fiscal 1995 sales have a 57% commercial content, up from 17% in 1988. This
reflects a substantial increase in commercial business, nearly offsetting the
decline in defense revenues.
It should also be emphasized that many of the commercial products and
services Maxwell is developing are really revolutionary, not just evolutionary.
The time from product concept to a commercially marketable product is measured
3
<PAGE>
in years rather than months; significant revenues are realized long-term, as
opposed to monthly or quarterly returns characteristic of government
development contracts.
We see this effect in our PurePulse Technologies subsidiary. The concept
phase of PurePulse's technology began in 1981. To date, more than $12 million
has been invested in the commercialization of this revolutionary technology,
and while prototype units are now being sold, serial production has not yet
begun.
We have learned that the transition from defense contracting to
market-driven commercial sales is more difficult than we had anticipated. The
time and resources required to develop and bring commercial products to market
are considerable. As a consequence, we are focusing on those market
opportunities that allow us to use our resources most productively.
Q
Define Maxwell, if you could. What kind of company are you, and where are
you going?
A
Maxwell has three strong core competencies: power conversion components and
systems; purification technology; and information technology. The first two
are based on high-energy-density pulsed power. Information technology includes
both our computer software and hardware. We are applying our core technologies
to improve the quality of life in such areas as food and medical product
sterilization, low emission vehicle power sources, information networks, and
law enforcement. Today, Maxwell is providing improved capabilities for all
these applications.
With the exception of the I-Bus division, virtually all of the core
competencies were developed within Maxwell to respond to the requirements of
government agencies--the Defense Nuclear Agency, the Advanced Research Projects
Agency, and the National Laboratories of the Department of Energy. We still
have a number of products and services of interest to the Department of
Defense, and intend to continue to pursue those in order
to keep our technology base well honed.
To elaborate first on pulsed power, consider the following:
In the food processing and packaging markets, PurePulse Technologies'
PureBright(R)
4
<PAGE>
[PHOTO PAGE -- Text Continues on Page 7.]
POWER
CONVERSION
Maxwell was founded to develop and manufacture high-energy-density
capacitors. Its pioneering technologies have led to a new generation of
specialized capacitors for use in large commercial markets.
Specialized capacitors play a prominent role as one of the Company's most
innovative technologies. For example, Sierra division's new filter/capacitor
for the implantable pacemaker and defibrillator markets has been well received.
This capacitor blocks external sources of electromagnetic energy, such as
microwave transmissions, from affecting the internal circuitry.
[PICTURE APPEARS HERE]
Maxwell's new high-energy-density capacitor--the Ultracapacitor--has 10
times the energy density of any other capacitor built by Maxwell, and 3 to 5
times the energy density of any competing capacitor for the promising hybrid
electric vehicle market. The Ultracapacitor can also be used to provide a back-
up power source for industrial and commercial facilities during intermittent
power outages.
Power conversion presents many opportunities in large and growing markets.
Mining, health care, and transportation are just three areas where pulsed power
has the potential to do a job faster, more cost effectively, and safer.
5
<PAGE>
[PHOTO PAGE -- Text Continues on Page 7.]
PURIFICATION
SYSTEMS
The art of effectively using instantaneous pulses of intense light to
kill microbiological organisms is the product of Maxwell's more than
25 years of experience with high-energy-density pulsed power.
Maxwell pioneered the use of high-energy pulsed power for sterilization
purposes back in 1981. Since that time, more than $12 million has been
invested to produce hardware with consistently high levels of performance and
reliability.
[PICTURE APPEARS HERE]
PurePulse Technologies' proprietary PureBright(R) system gives the health care
industry an effective new tool for sterilizing medical products--in this case,
intravenous solutions.
The development of
reliable and cost effective
pulsed light and pulsed electric
field systems present substantial
opportunities for Maxwell's PurePulse
Technologies subsidiary in areas such
as food safety, air and water purification,
and medical products and package sterilization.
6
<PAGE>
system generates intense pulses of light that kill microorganisms,
extending the shelf life of foods. Our CoolPure(TM) system generates pulsed
electric fields in liquid foods, again extending shelf life. Outside the food
area, we are also addressing markets which could be substantial for medical
sterilization and purification of water and air.
Our Ultracapacitors have two exciting applications. One is to level the
electrical loads on batteries in electric or hybrid electric vehicles during
acceleration or braking, thus extending both battery life and driving range for
vehicles designed in response to increasingly stringent Corporate Average Fuel
Economy (CAFE) standards. Ultracapacitors can also provide continuous power
for large commercial and industrial facilities in the event of intermittent
power outages.
Another example of our core technical competency is our proprietary
electrothermal chemical cartridge (ETC). Originally developed for advanced
conventional weapons systems, this cartridge has a controllable explosive
capability for construction and demolition, mining, and fragmenting very large
rocks.
Q. These are examples of pulsed power that Maxwell has talked about in the
past. What are some of the lesser discussed areas of promise?
A. One which was noted in the letter to shareholders is Maxwell's I-Bus
division, a leader in producing customized, real-time commercial and industrial
integrated PC systems for original equipment manufacturer (OEM) applications.
Ruggedized PC platforms offer economical solutions with a fast time to market.
I-Bus has grown steadily by positioning itself as the ideal strategic partner
to medium-to-large OEMs.
Software integration and networking services for information systems is
another area in which respectable sales have already been achieved. By
leveraging the expertise originally developed to support our defense business,
the software and systems integration group of our S-Cubed division won two
multi-year contracts in 1994 totaling $6.9 million. One contract was for network
hardware for a state-of-the-art computerized Child Support Enforcement System;
the other was for upgrading a county Criminal Justice
7
<PAGE>
Information System, with the latest integrated data base and graphics tools.
More recently, two additional contracts were announced by our S-Cubed
division. One was a $3.2 million order to integrate computer systems for the
Florida Association of County Clerks. The second was an educational software
development and licensing agreement for algebra and physics instructional
products with Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, the largest distributor of secondary
educational materials in the country. Success in this initiative could open
the way to very large markets.
Q
What is the potential for further software business?
A
I believe we've barely scratched the surface with the programs just
mentioned. First, many state and local governments are facing increasing
pressures to reduce costs and increase efficiency. Up-to-date complex computer
hardware and software can help solve these problems. Second, the information
technology group is establishing itself in this market. Upon successful
completion of work in progress, we should have a strong record
of performance--something rare in this emerging marketplace.
Q
For several years, Maxwell has talked of new business opportunities and
technology applications. Should the Company have concentrated its resources on
fewer applications--those offering the greatest promise?
A
Ideally, you want the broadest range of new ideas to flow through the
organization. Then a downselection process takes place. We have carefully
chosen all the new applications because they initially met several key
criteria. In some cases, potential customers were not only interested in our
technology, they were willing and able to fund development to determine concept
feasibility. In virtually all cases, there appeared to be a substantial market
with growth rates consistent with our corporate needs, and in which the
technology appeared appropriate to match the market opportunity.
A company of our size does not have the financial development and
marketing resources
8
<PAGE>
[PHOTO PAGE -- Text Continues on Page 11.]
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY--SOFTWARE
Skills developed by S-Cubed's professionals for three-dimensional modeling and
space physics programs are now being applied to educational, criminal justice,
and other software markets.
Long noted for its ability
to develop the innovative software
needed to solve complex problems, S-Cubed
has also become a recognized provider of
networking and systems integration.
[PICTURE APPEARS HERE]
Applying its real-world
experiences, S-Cubed's staff has developed
an interactive CD-ROM physics
program which is being marketed
by Glencoe / McGraw-Hill
to the educational
marketplace.
As it successfully
completes its work on programs such
as a county Criminal Justice Information
System, a statewide Child Support Enforcement
Program, and a computer system
upgrade for a County Clerks Association,
S-Cubed is positioning itself to be a
recognized, dependable justice information
systems integrator, providing
software/ hardware solutions to government
agencies needing to increase efficiencies and
reduce costs.
9
<PAGE>
[PHOTO PAGE -- Text Continues on Page 11.]
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY--HARDWARE
By establishing itself as the ideal partner for Original Equipment Manufacturers
(OEMs) who require customized computers for their automated applications, I-Bus
has achieved a 28% compound growth rate.
I-Bus is an industry leader
in the design and production of
customized CPUs, enclosures, and systems
for OEM applications.
[PICTURE APPEARS HERE]
I-Bus provides this customized computer for
In-Flight Entertainment Systems.
The rugged computer provides the master
control functions for In-Flight's telephone
and entertainment systems located in the seat
backs and armrests of commercial aircraft.
Whether the application is in-flight
entertainment, computer telephony,
medical, automated equipment, or test
equipment, I-Bus has the resources to
respond quickly and cost effectively
to provide its customers with superior
custom computer solutions.
10
<PAGE>
needed to bring all of its technology applications to market. We are
concentrating our product development and marketing on those applications which
promise the greatest long- term potential. We have also been diligent in
searching out strategic partners to help us in these areas.
Q
It appears that some newer pulsed power applications are not generating
commercial sales as rapidly as Maxwell might have hoped. Why is this?
A
Whether we're talking about mining, food and medical purification, or other
applications, pulsed power generally does not represent the only way a process
can be improved. If our technology is adopted, it will generally replace an
existing technology. Therefore, it's not a question of one minor component
replacing another; rather, it represents a major change in the way the process
is carried out. Our new method therefore competes in both cost and efficiency
with the existing process.
From a customer's standpoint, replacement of an existing way of doing
things with Maxwell technology could mean a major, and potentially expensive,
retrofit program. Before a customer makes such a commitment, he will want--and
is entitled to--answers to important questions such as: What is the
improvement in performance? Can we maintain or improve reliability? How does
the cost of the proposed process compare? Are there substantial advantages to
the new system?
It takes time to acquire test data to answer such questions with
confidence. Since we must deliver the best product possible, we use the test
data to further enhance the product. In addition, it is normally necessary to
establish a test site to demonstrate whether or not
our product provides real advantages in an operating environment.
Q
Some of Maxwell's products require Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approval. What can be said about the time lines of the approval process?
A
The process itself is understandably deliberate and therefore slow--especially
with
11
<PAGE>
revolutionary technology applications. However, with PurePulse technology--
PureBright and CoolPure--we are making good progress in obtaining FDA approvals.
We are also beginning the process with the FDA for approval of purification
technology for medical and pharmaceutical products and processes. We expect that
FDA approval will lead to more application evaluations and testing with
customers at our PurePulse facilities. More importantly, FDA approval will
facilitate the establishment of product pilot lines and help accelerate the
commercial sales of PurePulse systems.
Q
Can you expand on your strategic plans for power conversion products?
A
Yes, particularly in regard to our ETC cartridge and Ultracapacitor
technologies. First, we are evaluating the use of our proprietary ETC
cartridge technology for mining, construction, and demolition applications.
Encouraging rock blasting tests have just been completed in an underground
working mine. Test results indicate that the ETC cartridge is potentially
superior to conventional explosives in terms of blast characteristics and mine
safety. It has the potential to allow mining to be done continuously, thus
reducing costs; and it will give the mining crew better control over the blast.
Of equal importance, our cartridge eliminates toxic fumes, thus providing
greater personal safety for mining crews. We are developing business
arrangements with potential strategic partners to further evaluate and
commercialize the technology.
Second, although still in the laboratory stage, Ultracapacitors are
being scaled up to meet load level requirements consistent with loads on
batteries that power electric or hybrid electric vehicles. To date, we have
built and successfully tested small prototypes. Our first scaled-up
Ultracapacitors have the highest energy density ever achieved--more than 10
times the energy density of any other commercial capacitor ever produced by
Maxwell. We believe this energy-density level to be three to five times greater
than any known competing capacitor for electric vehicle use. In this area, we
are also seeking strategic partners to provide development investment and
marketing support.
12
<PAGE>
Q
Are there other areas of interest to investors?
A
Yes. Our Sierra division has developed a proprietary miniature capacitor
with the ability to filter out externally caused high frequency signals that may
interfere with the operation of implantable heart defibrillators and pacemakers.
Sierra has been shipping the new filter/capacitor for several months. With about
three million wearers of implantable devices worldwide, and annual sales of
350,000 new devices, this promises to be a substantial market opportunity.
Q
Do you consider current profitability to be at an acceptable level?
A
No, it certainly isn't the kind of margin we should be satisfied with in the
long term. What we are working on is striking the proper balance in the
trade-off between current earnings and investments in new products that will
produce larger earnings in the future.
Q
What can investors look forward to in 1996?
A
In 1996, our primary goal is to expand market penetration with existing
products and to increase profit margins by becoming more efficient internally.
In addition, we intend to pursue license and joint development agreements which
should provide us with the resources to successfully commercialize our core
competencies. We intend to invest more selectively in order to accelerate the
development of our products and reduce their time-to-market.
In summary, we anticipate expansion of our existing commercial business
with an increase in both sales and profit in 1996. We also look for positive
developments with new product applications to achieve our long-term objectives.
13
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
FIVE-YEAR SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS & RATIOS) YEAR ENDED JULY 31
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales $75,004 $85,463 $86,902 $90,159 $86,312
Costs and expenses 74,588 88,098 85,149 96,851 82,444
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority
interest 416 (2,635) 1,753 (6,692) 3,868
Provision for income taxes 15 (1,028) 683 (2,745) 1,137
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary 86 80 48 30 72
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 315 $(1,687) $ 1,022 $(3,977) $ 2,659
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary $ .12 $ (.63) $ .38 $ (1.50) $ 1.00
Fully diluted $ .12 $ (.63) $ .37 $ (1.50) $ .99
Cash dividends per share $ .40 $ .40
Total assets $52,370 $54,322 $55,086 $59,925 $56,413
Working capital $17,855 $18,091 $20,142 $18,410 $22,976
Working capital ratio 2.37:1 2.31:1 2.49:1 2.02:1 3.24:1
Long-term debt $ 1,928 $ 2,797 $ 1,515 $ 2,538 $ 1,710
Shareholders' equity at year-end $35,364 $34,960 $36,645 $35,456 $40,164
Shares outstanding at year-end 2,689 2,675 2,675 2,656 2,636
Book value per share at year-end $ 13.15 $ 13.07 $ 13.70 $ 13.35 $ 15.24
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) JULY 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,053 $ 4,579
Accounts receivable:
Trade and other, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$545 in 1995 and $530 in 1994 9,589 9,883
Long-term contracts 6,441 6,140
------- -------
16,030 16,023
Inventories and inventoried costs relating to long-term contracts 7,239 7,608
Recoverable income taxes 861 64
Prepaid expenses 572 512
Deferred income taxes 2,090 3,135
------- -------
Total Current Assets 30,845 31,921
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization 20,315 20,981
Deposits and Other 1,210 1,420
------- -------
$52,370 $54,322
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 9,400 $ 9,925
Accrued employee compensation 2,681 2,936
Current portion of long-term debt 909 969
------- -------
Total Current Liabilities 12,990 13,830
Long-Term Debt 1,928 2,797
Deferred Income Taxes 805 1,030
Minority Interest and Additional Amounts Contributed 1,283 1,705
Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock, $.10 par value
Authorized 5,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding: 1995-2,689,185 shares;
1994-2,674,973 shares 269 267
Additional paid-in capital 18,889 18,802
Retained earnings 16,206 15,891
------- -------
35,364 34,960
------- -------
$52,370 $54,322
======= =======
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) YEAR ENDED JULY 31
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales $75,004 $85,463 $86,902
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 56,447 68,555 65,765
Selling, administrative and general expenses 13,636 14,068 13,525
Research and development expenses 5,038 4,794 5,650
Loss on closing of Brobeck division 1,018
Interest expense 315 252 244
Other-net (848) (589) (35)
------- ------- -------
74,588 88,098 85,149
------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest 416 (2,635) 1,753
Provision for income taxes 15 (1,028) 683
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary 86 80 48
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 315 $(1,687) $ 1,022
======= ======= =======
Earnings (loss) per share:
Primary $ .12 $ (.63) $ .38
======= ======= =======
Fully Diluted $ .12 $ (.63) $ .37
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
REPORT OF
ERNST & YOUNG LLP,
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc.
We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated balance sheets of Maxwell Laboratories, Inc., and subsidiary at
July 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended July 31, 1995 (not presented separately herein) and in our report dated
September 28, 1995, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the consolidated financial statements from
which it has been derived.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
---------------------------------
Ernst & Young LLP
San Diego, California
September 28, 1995
16
<PAGE>
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Alan C. Kolb, Ph.D./1/
President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
General Donn A. Starry, USA (Ret.)/1//,//2/
Chairman of the Board, Director
Sean M. Maloy
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer, Director
Kedar D. Pyatt, Jr., Ph.D./1/
Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer,
Director
Gary J. Davidson
Vice President-Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Donald M. Roberts
General Counsel
Richard C. Eppel
Vice President
Richard E. Smith
Vice President
Eduardo M. Waisman, Ph.D.
Vice President
Karl M. Samuelian/1/
Chairman of the Executive Committee and
Secretary, Director, Shareholder in the law firm
of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian,
Los Angeles, California
Lewis J. Colby, Jr., Ph.D./2/
Director, Retired Senior Vice President-
Technology, Allied-Signal, Inc., Morristown,
New Jersey
Adolphe G. Gueymard/2/
Director, Oil and Gas Investments, Houston, Texas
Admiral Thomas B. Hayward, USN (Ret.)/2/
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Thomas B. Hayward Associates, Honolulu, Hawaii,
an Asia-Pacific consulting firm
Henry F. Owsley/2/
Director, Founding Partner, The Gordian Group,
New York, New York
John W. Weil, Ph.D./2/
Director, President, Weil Associates, Inc.,
Consultants for Technology Appraisal,
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
Louis Siegel
Director Emeritus/3/, Retired Senior Executive
Vice President and Consultant, Union Bank,
Los Angeles, California
Outside Counsel
Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian,
Los Angeles, California
Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP, San Diego, California
Transfer Agent and Registrar
First Interstate Bank, Stock Transfer Department,
P.O. Box 54261, Terminal Annex, Los Angeles,
California 90054, (800) 522-6645
Corporate Offices
8888 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, California
92123-1506, (619) 279-5100
Form 10-K
The Company's Form 10-K annual report is available
to shareholders on written request directed to the
Vice President-Finance and Administration, at the
Company's corporate offices.
Stock Information
Maxwell Common Stock is traded over the counter
and is quoted in the NASDAQ National Market
System. The trading symbol is MXWL.
1995 Annual Meeting
The 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will
be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 12,
1995, at the La Jolla Marriott, 4240 La Jolla
Village Drive, La Jolla, California 92037. October
16, 1995, was the record date for determining the
shareholders entitled to vote at this meeting.
/1/ Member of the Executive Committee
/2/ Member of the Audit Committee
/3/ Retired 1991
<PAGE>
Maxwell Laboratories, Inc.
8888 Balboa Avenue
San Diego
California 92123-1506
(619) 279-5100
<PAGE>
MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC.
PROXY PROXY
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE 1995 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The undersigned shareholder of MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC. hereby appoints
Karl M. Samuelian and Alan C. Kolb and each of them, with full power of
substitution to each, proxies of the undersigned to represent the undersigned
at the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC. to be
held on December 12, 1995 at 10:00 A.M., local time, at the La Jolla Marriott,
4240 La Jolla Village Drive, La Jolla, California, and at any adjournment(s)
thereof, with all powers, including voting rights, which the undersigned would
possess if personally present at said meeting on the following:
(1) Election of Three Directors of the Company of Class III to serve until the
1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MAXWELL LABORATORIES, INC. and until
their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
[_] FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED BELOW [_] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote
(except as marked to the for all listed below
contrary below)
Alan C. Kolb, Karl M. Samuelian, Thomas B. Hayward
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority for any individual nominee write that
nominee's name in the space provided below.)
----------------------------------------------------------
(2) Approval of the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan.
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
(3) In their discretion, upon all matters as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. UNLESS A CONTRARY DIRECTION IS
INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED
ABOVE AND FOR PROPOSAL (2) ABOVE.
The proxies (or, if only one, then that one proxy) or their substitutes
acting at the meeting may exercise all powers hereby conferred.
The undersigned hereby revokes any prior proxy and ratifies and confirms all
that the above-named proxies or their substitutes, and each of them, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the 1995 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders and accompanying Proxy Statement dated October 31,
1995.
Dated: _______________________, 1995
____________________________________
Signature
____________________________________
IMPORTANT: In signing this Proxy,
please sign your name or names in
the same way as shown at left. When
signing as a fiduciary, please give
your full title. If shares are
registered in the names of two or
more persons, each should sign.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE MARK, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
