<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For Quarter Ended June 30, 1999
Commission File Number 1-4373
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 86-0654102
(State or other jurisdiction of I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number
1600 North Desert Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85281
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(602) 389-8600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, at the latest practical date.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLASS OUTSTANDING AS OF JULY 27, 1999
- ----- -------------------------------
<S> <C>
Common 7,048,036
Par value $.01 per share
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 2
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Balance Sheets-
June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998................................... 1
Consolidated Statements of Income-
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998.............. 2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-
Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998............................... 3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements..................................... 4
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............................................ 6
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 4. SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.......................... 13
ITEM 5. OTHER MATTERS................................................................. 14
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.............................................. 14
SIGNATURES...................................................................................... 14
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------- --------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,777 $ 4,946
Accounts receivable, net 24,590 18,601
Inventories, net 15,249 12,493
Deferred tax asset 2,649 2,680
Other current assets 1,952 2,313
-------- --------
Total current assets 50,217 41,033
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net 35,830 33,314
OTHER ASSETS 3,536 3,557
-------- --------
$ 89,583 $ 77,904
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 17,305 $ 10,649
Accrued liabilities 4,461 4,673
Current taxes payable 18 235
Current portion of long-term debt 6,461 651
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 28,245 16,208
-------- --------
LONG-TERM DEBT 6,634 7,444
-------- --------
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY 3,104 3,156
-------- --------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock 80 80
Additional paid-in capital 32,545 32,484
Retained earnings 27,247 26,849
Cumulative translation adjustment 10 8
Less - Treasury stock, at cost (8,282) (8,325)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity 51,600 51,096
-------- --------
$ 89,583 $ 77,904
======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
1
<PAGE> 4
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------- ------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
-------- ---------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES $ 31,600 $ 22,682 $ 54,644 $ 41,161
-------- -------- -------- --------
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales 25,103 17,095 45,294 30,782
Selling, general and administrative 2,493 1,815 4,942 3,434
Research and technology 2,008 1,904 3,829 3,593
-------- -------- -------- --------
29,604 20,814 54,065 37,809
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income 1,996 1,868 579 3,352
-------- -------- -------- --------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest, net (211) 130 (366) 322
Other, net (3) (6) (33) (23)
-------- -------- -------- --------
(214) 124 (399) 299
-------- -------- -------- --------
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR
(BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES 1,782 1,992 180 3,651
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 742 869 (218) 1,533
-------- -------- -------- --------
NET INCOME $ 1,040 $ 1,123 $ 398 $ 2,118
======== ======== ======== ========
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic $ 0.15 $ 0.14 $ 0.06 $ 0.27
======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted $ 0.15 $ 0.14 $ 0.06 $ 0.26
======== ======== ======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES
Basic 7,017 7,918 7,015 7,913
======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted 7,106 8,128 7,120 8,141
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
2
<PAGE> 5
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------------
1999 1998
---------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 398 $ 2,118
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 2,605 2,178
Provision for (reduction of) accounts receivable valuation reserves 117 (15)
Provision for (reduction of) inventory valuation reserves 1,561 (803)
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in accounts receivable (6,106) (1,794)
(Increase) in inventories (4,316) (13,341)
(Increase) decrease in other assets 363 (153)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 6,443 7,917
Increase (decrease) in taxes payable, net (238) 1,851
-------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 827 (2,042)
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net (5,102) (4,880)
Investments -- (2,420)
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (5,102) (7,300)
-------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from notes payable to banks 5,000 --
Issuance of treasury stock 43 22
Stock options exercised 61 48
-------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities 5,104 70
-------- --------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS 2 (14)
-------- --------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS 831 (9,286)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period 4,946 16,371
-------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $ 5,777 $ 7,085
======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
3
<PAGE> 6
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note A The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial information and the instructions to
Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary
to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows for all periods presented have been made. The results of
operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 are
not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be
expected for the entire year ending December 31, 1999. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's December
31, 1998 financial statements and accompanying notes thereto.
Note B Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the three and six-month periods. Diluted earnings per common
share for the three and six-months period are determined assuming that
the options were exercised at the beginning of the period or at the
time of issuance, if later.
Note C Inventories consist of the following at:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 1999 December 31, 1998
------------- -----------------
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Raw Materials $10,800 $ 9,367
Work-in-process 2,322 1,459
Finished Good 2,127 1,667
------- -------
$15,249 $12,493
======= =======
</TABLE>
Note D Property, plant, and equipment consist of the following at:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, 1999 December 31, 1998
------------- -----------------
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Building and improvements $ 15,997 $ 13,031
Furniture and equipment 39,459 37,324
-------- --------
55,456 50,355
Less accumulated depreciation (19,626) (17,041)
-------- --------
$ 35,830 $ 33,314
======== ========
</TABLE>
Note E Segment information:
Management monitors and evaluates the financial performance of the
Company's operations by its four operating segments located in various
parts of the world. These segments consist of three manufacturing
operations, located in the United States, China, and the Philippines,
and a sales and distribution operation in the United Kingdom.
The following operating segment information includes financial
information (in thousands) for all four of the Company's operating
segments.
4
<PAGE> 7
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended United United
June 30, 1999 States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total
------------- ------ ------- ----- ----------- ------------ -----
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 10,535 $ 14,225 $ 6,840 $ - $ - $ 31,600
Intersegment sales 18,427 - 2,694 804 (21,925) -
Income before provision for
(benefit from) income taxes 1,345 245 292 16 (116) 1,782
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended United United
June 30, 1998 States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total
------------- ------ ------- ----- ----------- ------------ -----
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 16,071 $ 6,611 $ - $ - $ - $ 22,682
Intersegment sales 7,098 - - 727 (7,825) -
Income before provision for
(benefit from) income taxes 1,992 423 (382) 24 (65) 1,992
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended United United
June 30, 1999 States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total
------------- ------ ------- ----- ----------- ------------ -----
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 17,483 $ 24,576 $ 12,585 $ - $ - $ 54,644
Intersegment sales 33,518 - 3,839 1,595 (38,952) -
Income before provision for
(benefit from) income taxes (609) 382 349 31 27 180
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Months Ended United United
June 30, 1998 States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total
------------- ------ ------- ----- ----------- ------------ -----
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 30,070 $ 11,091 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,161
Intersegment sales 11,212 - - 1,325 (12,537) -
Income before provision for
(benefit from) income taxes 3,636 397 (382) 37 (37) 3,651
</TABLE>
Note F Comprehensive income (in thousands) during:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Quarter ended June 30 $1,042 $1,107
Six months ended June 30 400 2,104
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE> 8
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT RESULTS
Except for the historical information contained herein, this Report
contains forward looking statements including those relating to margins, pricing
pressures, quarterly fluctuations, the impact of our China facility, material
shortages, and research and technology expenses that involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially.
We caution that these statements are qualified by various factors that
may affect future results including the following: changes in the market for our
products and the success of our customers' products, the failure of key
technologies to deliver commercially acceptable performance, our dependence on
one large customer, the absence of long-term purchase commitments, and our
lengthy development periods and product acceptance cycles. This Report should be
read in conjunction with our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998.
OVERVIEW
We offer advanced design and manufacturing services to original
equipment manufacturers, commonly referred to as OEMs. We specialize in custom
display modules utilizing liquid crystal display, or LCD, components and
technology. Our LCD modules have varying levels of integration. At a minimum,
each module includes an LCD, a custom LCD driver, and a flexible connector. We
also provide value-added services, which increase our profit margins, by
assembling additional components onto the module based upon the specific needs
of the customer. These additional components include such items as key pads,
plastics, speakers, light guides, and optics.
We currently sell substantially all of our LCD modules to major OEMs.
When we win a design program, our customer typically pays most or all of our
nonrecurring engineering expenses to defray the costs of custom design, as well
as the costs of nonrecurring tooling for custom components. The typical program
life cycle of a custom-designed LCD module is three to twelve months and
includes technical design, prototyping, pilot manufacturing, and high-volume
manufacturing. We typically seek large volume programs from major OEMs. The
minimum production quantity for an LCD module typically approximates 100,000
units per year, although the production rate for some programs has been as high
as 100,000 units per week. The selling price of our LCD modules usually ranges
between $5 and $20 per unit. We recognize revenue upon product shipment.
We experienced substantial growth from 1993 through 1995, primarily as
a result of sales to OEMs in the wireless communications industry, which grew
substantially during that period. During that period, our primary customer was
Motorola. In 1996, our net sales declined, primarily as a result of the
phase-out by Motorola of a significant family of programs. In 1997, our net
sales returned to pre-1996 levels primarily as a result of several new programs
and customers, including Hewlett-Packard. Motorola accounted for 65.1% of our
net sales in 1996, 34.6% in 1997, and 63.6% in 1998. In the first half of 1999,
net sales to Motorola increased at a rate faster than net sales to our other
customers and represented 80.8% of our net sales. Hewlett-Packard accounted for
32.0% of our net sales in 1997, and less than 10% in 1998 and the first half of
1999. This percentage decrease occurred as several older Hewlett-Packard
programs matured. In addition, new programs launched by Hewlett-Packard in 1998
either did not require our LCD modules or required less complex, lower cost
modules.
During the past several years, we have experienced seasonal quarterly
fluctuations in our net sales as our OEM customers developed retail products
with shorter product life cycles and phased out older programs early in the year
following holiday sales. As a result, sales usually peak in the fourth quarter
of a calendar year and are lower in the following quarter.
Several factors impact our gross margins, including manufacturing
efficiencies, product differentiation, product uniqueness, inventory management,
product mix, and volume pricing. Currently, significant pricing pressure exists
in the LCD module market, especially in higher volume programs in the wireless
communications
6
<PAGE> 9
industry. Accordingly, as the production levels of some of our new higher volume
programs have increased, the lower standard gross margins on those programs have
impacted our overall margins.
We vertically integrate our manufacturing facilities. In Arizona, we
own and operate the largest high-volume LCD production line in North America. We
generally use the Arizona facility for the manufacture of more technologically
complex and custom high-volume LCDs. We also purchase LCDs from Asian sources to
provide us an alternate source and to ensure available capacity. In order to
take advantage of lower labor costs, we ship our LCDs to our facilities in
Manila, the Philippines, or Beijing, China, for assembly into modules.
Historically, we have conducted most of our manufacturing operations at
our facility in Manila. At that facility, we assemble LCDs into modules and
perform certain back-end LCD processing operations. We conduct our operations in
Manila under an agreement with a third-party subcontract manufacturer. Under
this agreement, the subcontractor supplies direct labor and incidental services
required to manufacture our products. We also lease our manufacturing facility
from the subcontractor. All indirect manufacturing employees, primarily
technicians, supervisors, and engineers, are our employees.
In early 1998, we decided to open a similar display module
manufacturing facility in Beijing. Within six months, we located a temporary
manufacturing facility, equipped the facility, trained our personnel, qualified
the facility for customers, and qualified products manufactured at the facility.
As we began manufacturing operations in Beijing in the second and third quarters
of 1998, however, we incurred costs in advance of the receipt of significant
sales. These incremental Beijing-based expenses were reflected in our cost of
sales. We began manufacturing in volume in Beijing in the fourth quarter of
1998. We operated the temporary Beijing facility at approximately 80% of
capacity during the second quarter of 1999.
We commenced construction of our permanent Beijing facility in late
1998. This facility was substantially completed in early July 1999, and we are
currently in the process of occupying this new facility. We own our Beijing
facility through a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary. We expect to begin
production in the new manufacturing facility late in the third quarter of 1999.
We believe that the gross margin contribution of our Beijing facility will
increase as additional manufacturing lines are added and fixed overhead expenses
are spread over a greater volume of sales.
Selling, general, and administrative expense consists principally of
administrative and selling costs, salaries, commissions, and benefits to
personnel and related facility costs. We make substantially all of our sales
directly to OEMs, and our sales force consists of a small number of direct
technical sales persons. As a result, there is no material cost of distribution
in our selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general, and
administrative expense has increased as we have expanded our business and
increased our diversification efforts. In addition, we have recently incurred
substantial marketing and administrative expenses in connection with our LCoS
microdisplay business.
Research and technology expense consists principally of salaries and
benefits to scientists, design engineers, and other technical personnel, related
facility costs, process development costs, and various expenses for projects,
including new product development. Research and technology expense continues to
increase as we develop new display products and technologies, especially LCoS
microdisplays, while we continue with our in-house process development efforts
related to the high-volume LCD manufacturing line located in Arizona.
Since 1997, we have been working on the development of LCoS
microdisplays. In 1997, we entered into a strategic alliance with National
Semiconductor Corporation for the development of LCoS microdisplay products.
Under that alliance, National focused on the silicon technologies needed for
microdisplays, and we focused on the liquid crystal technologies. National
recently decided to close its microdisplay business unit, and in connection with
that closing, in July 1999, we purchased certain assets and licensed silicon
technologies from National relating to LCoS microdisplays for approximately $3.0
million in cash and warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of our common stock in a
transaction valued at approximately $3.6 million. No additional payments are
required under the licenses. We also hired several key technical employees of
National to assist in the implementation of the acquired technologies.
7
<PAGE> 10
In April 1998, we entered into a strategic relationship with inViso,
Inc., formerly Siliscape, Inc., a privately held company with numerous patents
and proprietary technology related to microdisplay development. We acquired a
minority equity interest in inViso for approximately $3.3 million. As part of
this strategic relationship, we provide proprietary manufacturing capabilities
and liquid crystal expertise, and inViso provides patented and proprietary
technologies and components for the joint development of microdisplay products.
These acquisitions, investments, and licenses will result in increased
research and technology expenses as we expand our LCoS microdisplay development
efforts in preparation for the commercial introduction of LCoS microdisplay
products. We are also considering licensing other technologies from other
companies that could be optimized on our LCD manufacturing line as well as
entering into further alliances. We expect to continue to devote substantial
resources to research and development, focusing, especially in the near term, on
our LCoS microdisplay technology and related products. As a result, the actual
dollar amount of our research and technology expenses will continue to increase.
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
NET SALES. Net sales increased 39.2% to $31.6 million in the three
months ended June 30, 1999 from $22.7 million in the three months ended June 30,
1998. This increase was the result of several new programs, primarily for
Motorola. Motorola accounted for approximately 85.1% of our net sales in the
three months ended June 30, 1999 as compared with approximately 52.9% in the
three months ended June 30, 1988.
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales increased to 79.4% of net sales in the
three months ended June 30, 1999 from 75.4% in the three months ended June 30,
1998. This percentage increase resulted primarily from significant price
pressure in the LCD module markets, especially affecting higher volume programs
in the wireless communications industry. In addition, high volume programs that
generally produce lower gross margins represented a larger percentage of net
sales, thereby reducing overall gross margin. Our gross margin was also
adversely impacted by the high fixed costs associated with the new Beijing
facility. In the three months ended June 30, 1999, our operations in Beijing
produced a gross profit contribution of $616,000 on net sales of $9.5 million,
corresponding to a gross margin in our Beijing facility of 6.5%.
SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE. Selling, general, and
administrative expense increased 38.9% to $2.5 million in the three months ended
June 30, 1999 from $1.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 1998.
Selling, general, and administrative expense was 7.9% of net sales in the three
months ended June 30, 1999 compared to 8.0% in the three months ended June 30,
1998. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expense reflected the
continued expansion of our business. In particular, in the three months ended
June 30, 1999, we incurred approximately $400,000 of marketing and
administrative expenditures relating to the LCoS microdisplay business compared
to approximately $50,000 in the three months ended June 30, 1998.
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY EXPENSE. Research and technology expense
increased 5.3% to $2.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 1999 from $1.9
million in the three months ended June 30, 1998. Research and technology expense
was 6.4% of net sales in the three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to 8.4%
in the three months ended June 30, 1998. Although research and technology
expense associated with in-process developments on the LCD line decreased in the
three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998, research
and technology expense overall increased as the result of the development of new
display products and technologies. For example, LCoS microdisplays accounted for
approximately $950,000 of research and technology expense in the three months
ended June 30, 1999 compared to approximately $550,000 in the three months ended
June 30, 1998.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Other expense in the three months ended
June 30, 1999 was $214,000 compared to other income of $124,000 in the three
months ended June 30, 1998. The difference was a result of increased interest
expense and reduced interest income. The increase in interest expense was
primarily a result of additional borrowing incurred in connection with the stock
repurchase program and increased borrowings on our working line of credit.
PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES. We had a provision for
income taxes of $742,000 in the three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to a
provision for income taxes of $869,000 in the three months
8
<PAGE> 11
ended June 30, 1998. This change resulted primarily from lower pre-tax income in
the three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998. The
tax rate decreased to 41.6% in the three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to
43.6% in the three months ended June 30, 1998. The increased tax rate in the
three months ended June 30, 1998 resulted primarily from losses in Beijing for
which we did not receive a tax benefit proportionate to our tax rate elsewhere
in the world. In the second half of 1999, we expect our overall tax rate to be
approximately 42.0%.
NET INCOME (LOSS). Net income decreased 9.1% to $1.0 million, or $0.15
per diluted share, in the three months ended June 30, 1999 from $1.1 million, or
$0.14 per diluted share, in the three months ended June 30, 1998. Excluding LCoS
microdisplay related expenses, our net income in the three months ended June 30,
1999 was approximately $1.8 million, or $0.25 per diluted share.
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
NET SALES. Net sales increased 32.5% to $54.6 million in the six months
ended June 30, 1999 from $41.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 1998.
This increase was the result of several new programs, primarily for Motorola.
COST OF SALES. Cost of sales increased to 83.0% of net sales in the six
months ended June 30, 1999 from 74.8% in the six months ended June 30, 1998.
This percentage increase resulted primarily from significant price pressure in
the LCD module markets, especially affecting higher volume programs in the
wireless communications industry. In addition, high volume programs that
generally produce lower gross margins represented a larger percentage of net
sales in the first six months of 1999, thereby reducing overall gross margin.
Our gross margin in the six months ended June 30, 1999 was also adversely
impacted by the under-utilization of our facility in Manila during the first
quarter of 1999, partly related to material shortages and allocation of
manufacturing to our new Beijing facility. Utilization of the Manila facility
improved during the second quarter of 1999. In addition, in late 1998 and early
1999, we moved the labor-intensive portion of our Arizona LCD line and certain
chip-on-glass equipment to Manila. Inefficiencies related to the start-up of the
new lines adversely affected manufacturing yields in Manila during the first
quarter of 1999. However, yields improved as the facility became fully
operational in the second quarter. In addition, high fixed overhead costs
associated with our new Beijing facility adversely impacted gross margins during
the first six months of 1999. In the first six months of 1999, our operations in
Beijing produced a gross profit contribution of $349,000 on net sales of $16.4
million, corresponding to a gross margin in our Beijing facility of 2.1%.
SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE. Selling, general, and
administrative expense increased 44.1% to $4.9 million in the six months ended
June 30, 1999 from $3.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 1998. Selling,
general, and administrative expense was 9.0% of net sales in the six months
ended June 30, 1999 compared to 8.3% in the six months ended June 30, 1998. The
increase in selling, general, and administrative expense reflected the continued
expansion of our business. In particular, in the first half of 1999, we incurred
approximately $800,000 of marketing and administrative expenditures relating to
our LCoS microdisplay business compared to approximately $100,000 in the first
six months of 1998.
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY EXPENSE. Research and technology expense
increased 5.6% to $3.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 1999 from $3.6
million in the six months ended June 30, 1998. Research and technology expense
was 7.0% of net sales in the six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to 8.8% in
the six months ended June 30, 1998. Although research and technology expense
associated with in-process developments on the LCD line decreased in the first
six months of 1999, research and technology expense overall increased as the
result of the development of new display products and technologies. For example,
LCoS microdisplays accounted for approximately $1.8 million of research and
technology expense in the first six months of 1999 compared to approximately
$1.0 million in the first six months of 1998.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Other expense in the six months ended June
30, 1999 was $399,000 compared to other income of $299,000 in the six months
ended June 30, 1998. The difference was a result of increased interest expense
and reduced interest income. The increase in interest expense was primarily a
result of
9
<PAGE> 12
additional borrowing incurred in connection with our stock repurchase program
and increased borrowings on our working capital line of credit. Reduced interest
income was a result of lower cash balances.
PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES. We had a benefit from income
taxes of $218,000 for the six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to a provision
for income taxes of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 1998. This
change resulted primarily from lower pre-tax income in the six months ended June
30, 1999 compared to the same period in 1998. In addition, we recorded a tax
benefit in the first quarter of 1999 relating to a state income tax refund. In
the second half of 1999, we expect our overall tax rate to be approximately
42.0%.
NET INCOME (LOSS). Net income decreased 81.0% to $398,000, or $0.06 per
diluted share, in the six months ended June 30, 1999 from $2.1 million, or $0.26
per diluted share, in the six months ended June 30, 1998. Excluding LCoS
microdisplay related expenses, our net income for the six months ended June 30,
1999 was approximately $1.9 million, or $0.27 per diluted share.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At June 30, 1999, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.8 million
compared to cash and cash equivalents of $4.9 million at December 31, 1998.
During the first six months of 1999, we had $827,000 in net cash flow
from operations compared to $2.0 million in net cash outflow from operations
during the first six months of 1998. Cash flow from operations improved
primarily as a result of a smaller increase in inventories during the six months
ended June 30, 1999 than during the comparable 1998 period, although this
improvement was offset by a greater increase in accounts receivable, primarily
as a result of increased sales. In addition, one of our major customers has
lengthened the payment terms to all of its vendors, including us. We anticipate
that accounts receivable will continue to increase during the balance of 1999 if
net sales increase, but we expect that inventory balances will level out as we
strive to increase inventory turns. Depreciation expense was $2.6 million in the
first six months of 1999 compared to $2.2 million in the first six months of
1998. This increase was primarily a result of an increased number of starts on
the LCD manufacturing line in Arizona. The high-volume LCD line is depreciated
on a units of production method based on units started.
Our working capital was $22.0 million at June 30, 1999, down from $24.8
million at December 31, 1998. Our current ratio at June 30, 1999 was 1.8-to-1
compared to 2.5-to-1 at December 31, 1998. The reduction in our working capital
and current ratio occurred primarily because of our substantial investments in
fixed assets in Beijing, including our new facility. Including our cash, cash
equivalents, and available credit facilities, we had approximately $15.8 million
in readily available funds at June 30, 1999 compared to $21.9 million at
December 31, 1998.
In November 1998, we entered into a new $25.0 million secured credit
facility with Imperial Bank and the National Bank of Canada. The credit facility
consists of a $15.0 million revolving line of credit that matures in 2000, which
is available for general corporate purposes, and a $10.0 million term loan
facility that matures in 2004, which provides available funds to repurchase our
common stock. At June 30, 1999, $8.1 million of borrowings were outstanding
under the term loan facility as a result of our purchase of almost one million
shares of our own common stock. Advances under the facilities may be made as
prime rate advances, which accrue interest payable monthly at the bank's prime
lending rate, or as LIBOR rate advances, which bear interest at 175 basis points
in excess of the LIBOR base rate for the general facility and 237.5 basis points
in excess of the LIBOR base rate for the repurchase facility. All outstanding
borrowings are prime rate advances.
Capital expenditures during the first half of 1999 were approximately
$5.1 million compared to $4.9 million during the first half of 1998. Capital
expenditures for the first half of 1999 consisted primarily of $3.8 million for
equipment and construction costs relating to our manufacturing facility in
Beijing and $1.3 million for manufacturing and office equipment for our
operations in Manila and Arizona. We anticipate the initial facilities and
capital cost for our operations in Beijing to be approximately $10.0 to $12.0
million. We expect to incur
10
<PAGE> 13
additional capital costs as we add additional manufacturing lines in Beijing. To
date, we have expended approximately $9.1 million in Beijing for manufacturing,
equipment, building construction, and land costs.
In July 1999, we purchased certain assets and licensed silicon
technologies from National Semiconductor relating to LCoS microdisplays for
approximately $3.0 million in cash and warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of our
common stock. Substantially all of the purchase price will be allocated to
depreciable assets, tooling and mask rights, and amortizable licenses.
We believe that our existing balances of cash and cash equivalents,
anticipated cash flows from operations, the proceeds of this offering, and
available and anticipated credit lines will provide adequate sources to fund our
operations and planned expenditures through 2000. We may have to expand our loan
commitments or pursue alternate methods of financing or raising capital,
however, should we encounter additional cash requirements. For example, accounts
receivable and inventory could rise faster than anticipated if revenue levels
increase more than currently anticipated. In addition, we will continue to seek
other alliances or acquisitions and additional relationships with regard to the
strategic development of various new technologies, especially LCoS
microdisplays, that may also require us to make additional capital investments.
We cannot provide assurance that adequate additional loan commitments or
alternative methods of financing will be available or, if available, that they
will be on terms acceptable to us.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE FLUCTUATIONS
The results of our operations for the periods discussed have not been
significantly affected by inflation or foreign currency fluctuations. We
generally sell our products and services and negotiate purchase orders with our
foreign suppliers in U.S. dollars. The sub-assembly agreement relating to our
operations in Manila, however, is based on a fixed conversion rate, exposing us
to exchange rate fluctuations with the Philippine peso. We have not incurred any
material exchange gains or losses to date. There has been some minor benefit as
a result of the peso devaluation, although we are now required to pay
approximately one-third of any peso devaluation gain to our lessor and direct
labor subcontractor in Manila.
We commenced operations in Beijing in 1998. Although the Chinese
currency currently is stable, its value in relation to the U.S. dollar is
determined by the Chinese government. There is general speculation that China
may devalue its currency in response to recent devaluations by several Asian
countries as a result of East Asia's economic crisis. Devaluation of the Chinese
currency could result in translation adjustments to our balance sheet as well as
reportable losses depending on our monetary balances and outstanding
indebtedness at the time of devaluation. The government of China historically
has made it difficult to convert its local currency into foreign currencies.
Although we from time to time may enter into hedging transactions in order to
minimize our exposure to currency rate fluctuations, the Chinese currency is not
freely traded and thus is difficult to hedge. In addition, the government of
China has recently imposed restrictions on Chinese currency loans to
foreign-operated entities in China. Based on the foregoing, there can be no
assurance that fluctuations and currency exchange rates in the future will not
have an adverse effect on our operations.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE DISCLOSURE
Many existing computer programs and databases use only two digits to
identify a year in the date field. For example, 99 would represent 1999. These
programs and databases were designed and developed without considering the
impact of the upcoming millennium. Consequently, date sensitive computer
programs may interpret the date "00" as 1900 rather than 2000. If not corrected,
many computer systems could fail or create erroneous results in 2000.
OUR STATE OF READINESS
We have completed an assessment of all of our internal and external
systems and processes with respect to the year 2000 issue. In response to this
assessment, we have created a multi-functional year 2000 task force to resolve
any non-compliant year 2000 systems or processes. This group is currently on
schedule to complete this task during the third quarter of 1999. We plan to
continuously test all of our internal and external systems and processes,
including the associated year 2000 fixes, for year 2000 compliance during 1999.
As part of this
11
<PAGE> 14
process, we have assessed the potential impact of year 2000 failures from
vendors and other companies upon our business and currently are taking steps to
minimize that risk. Based on our current state of readiness and the actions we
are currently taking, including installing backup processes and systems, we do
not believe that the year 2000 problem will have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, liquidity, or operations.
OUR COSTS OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
We estimate that our total costs of year 2000 compliance will be less
than $300,000. These costs include updating of computer software and hardware
manufacturing equipment, as well as employment and other out-of-pocket costs. To
date we have spent $224,000 for the upgrade and testing of our systems.
12
<PAGE> 15
RISKS OF YEAR 2000 ISSUES
We procure a significant amount of raw materials used in our
manufacturing processes from foreign vendors. As a result, we may be at risk
from foreign companies and countries that are not taking adequate measures to
ensure year 2000 compliance or that may not be at the same level of preparedness
as companies in the United States. For example, economic problems in Asia may
affect or divert resources with respect to the year 2000 issue. Failure of those
foreign countries and companies to be year 2000 compliant may cause material
shortages that could adversely impact our manufacturing operations. In addition,
we currently have significant manufacturing operations in Manila and Beijing. As
a result, we may be at risk with respect to suppliers of necessary resources,
such as power or water, that may not be year 2000 compliant. For example,
brownouts or blackouts may occur due to lack of year 2000 compliance. In
addition, some of our customers may experience catastrophic year 2000 failures,
including prolonged interruptions in factory production, in which case they may
have a reduced demand for our products.
OUR CONTINGENCY PLANS
We are developing contingency plans with respect to significant year
2000 issues that are within our control. For example, we are in the process of
assessing and verifying the year 2000 compliance of our international and
domestic raw material vendors. Verification will be accomplished through the use
of written inquiries to suppliers, certifications, audits, and information
provided by suppliers on their websites. We intend to replace any vendors found
not to be year 2000 compliant with vendors that are year 2000 compliant. In the
construction of our new Beijing facility, we procured material, processes, and
equipment that are year 2000 compliant. We also are investigating the use of
stand-by generators for our plants in the event of local power failures. We are
investigating transferring our manufacturing processes to alternate
manufacturing facilities if external factors beyond our control relative to the
year 2000 issue occur and we cannot conduct manufacturing operations at any
particular facility.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 4. SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on April 22, 1999. All of
the nominees were elected to our Board of Directors as set forth in the Proxy
Statement as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nominees Votes in Favor Withheld/Against
-------- -------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Jeffrey D. Buchanan 5,639,137 184,786
David C. Malmberg 5,642,761 181,162
Thomas H. Werner 5,640,051 183,872
Kenneth M. Julien 5,635,781 188,142
Gary R. Long 5,639,261 184,662
</TABLE>
The following items were also voted upon and approved by the
Stockholders:
(a) To approve the amendment to the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "1998
Plan").
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Votes in Favor Opposed Abstain
-------------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
5,406,596 384,421 32,906
</TABLE>
(b) To ratify the appointment of Arthur Andersen LLP as our independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Votes in Favor Opposed Abstain
-------------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
5,713,146 90,204 20,573
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE> 16
ITEM 5. OTHER MATTERS
Effective July 12, 1999, David R. Buchanan resigned as Acting President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Jack L. Saltich was named
President and Chief Executive Officer. He was also elected a director on July
22, 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Saltich served as Vice President of
Advanced Micro Devices from 1993 until July 1999 and as Executive Vice President
of Applied Micro Circuits Corp. from 1991 until 1993. He is to receive a base
salary of $320,000 and is eligible to participate in the incentive compensation
plan, stock option plans and other generally available benefit programs. He was
granted stock options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock
under the 1998 Stock Option Plan. The options vest over a four-year period and
are exercisable at fair market value as of the date of grant.
Mr. David Buchanan is expected to continue as a consultant with the
Company upon terms yet to be determined.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) EXHIBIT 11: Statement Re: Computation of Per Share
Earnings.
EXHIBIT 27: Financial Data Schedule
(b) Reports on Form 8-K: None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
------------------------
(Registrant)
Dated: July 28, 1999 By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
--------------------------
Name: Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Its: Executive Vice President;
Chief Financial Officer
14
<PAGE> 1
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
EXHIBIT 11
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
------------------------- --------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common shares outstanding beginning of period 7,012,107 7,907,123 7,005,107 7,905,523
Effect of Weighting Shares:
Employee stock options exercised 1,261 8,487 6,099 5,580
Issue of treasury stock 4,024 2,004 4,024 2,004
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Basic 7,017,392 7,917,614 7,015,230 7,913,107
========== ========== ========== ==========
Common shares outstanding beginning of period 7,012,107 7,907,123 7,005,107 7,905,523
Effect of Weighting Shares:
Employee stock options exercised 1,261 8,487 6,099 5,580
Employee stock options outstanding 88,470 210,369 104,278 228,200
Issue of treasury stock 4,024 2,004 4,024 2,004
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Diluted 7,105,862 8,127,983 7,119,508 8,141,307
========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income $1,040,000 $1,123,000 $ 398,000 $2,118,000
========== ========== ========== ==========
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic $ 0.15 $ 0.14 $ 0.06 $ 0.27
========== ========== ========== ==========
Diluted $ 0.15 $ 0.14 $ 0.06 $ 0.26
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE UNAUDITED SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 OF THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
LIABILITY OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING
WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY
INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH> 5,777
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 25,223
<ALLOWANCES> 633
<INVENTORY> 15,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 50,217
<PP&E> 55,456
<DEPRECIATION> 19,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 89,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 28,245
<BONDS> 13,095
0
0
<COMMON> 80
<OTHER-SE> 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 89,583
<SALES> 54,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 54,644
<CGS> 45,294
<TOTAL-COSTS> 54,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 33
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 366
<INCOME-PRETAX> 180
<INCOME-TAX> (218)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 398
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 398
<EPS-BASIC> 0.06
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.06
</TABLE>
