THREE FIVE SYSTEMS INC
S-3, 2000-04-27
SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES
Previous: ELDER BEERMAN STORES CORP, 10-K, 2000-04-27
Next: THREE FIVE SYSTEMS INC, S-3, 2000-04-27

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2000
Registration No. 333-            


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM S-3

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Delaware 86-0654102


(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

1600 North Desert Drive

Tempe, Arizona 85281
(602) 389-8600

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)


Jeffrey D. Buchanan

Chief Financial Officer
1600 North Desert Drive
Tempe, Arizona 85281
(602) 389-8600

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)


Copies to:

     
Robert S. Kant, Esq.
Jean E. Harris, Esq.
Brian H. Blaney, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
One East Camelback
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-1656
(602) 263-2300
Dennis C. Sullivan, Esq.
David A. Hubb, Esq.
Anne H. West, Esq.
Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP
400 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94301
(650) 328-6561


      Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

      If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box.  [   ]

      If any of the securities being registered in this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box.  [   ]

      If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  [   ]                 

      If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  [   ]                 

      If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box.  [   ]

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

         


Proposed
Title of Shares Maximum Aggregate Amount of
To be Registered Offering Price(1) Registration Fee

Common stock, par value $.01 $154,493,300.00 $40,786.23


(1)  Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o).


     The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.




Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed without notice. Three-Five Systems, Inc. may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and Three-Five Systems, Inc. is not soliciting offers to buy these securities, in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale of these securities is not permitted.

Prospectus (Not Complete)

Issued April 27, 2000

2,600,000 Shares

[THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS LOGO]

Common Stock


      Three-Five Systems, Inc. is offering 2,600,000 shares of common stock in a firmly underwritten offering.


      Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TFS.” The last reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on April 24, 2000 was $51.67 per share on a split-adjusted basis ($77.50 actual).


       Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5.


                 
Per Share Total


Offering Price $ $
Discounts and Commissions to Underwriters $ $
Offering Proceeds to Three-Five $ $

      Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

      We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional 390,000 shares to cover any over-allotments. The underwriters can exercise this right at any time within thirty days after the offering. The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to investors on              , 2000.

Joint Lead and Book-Running Managers

 
Banc of America Securities LLC Needham & Company, Inc.


ING Barings


The date of this prospectus is                , 2000


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Inside Front Cover Page:

      Upper-right: Picture of a woman using a cellular telephone

      Top: (Heading) “Technology, Design and Flexible, High-Volume Manufacturing To Serve Today’s Growing LCD Market”

      Text beneath top heading:

“We have over ten years of LCD design and manufacturing experience. We provide display design services and LCD manufacturing or the design, manufacturing, and integration of complete, custom LCD display module systems. Three-Five partners with each customer to add value at each step of the process, with fast, flexible, worldwide capability to meet any OEM demand.”

“Custom liquid crystal displays for the cellular communication and other established markets.”

Diagram describing the mechanics of an LCD display

      Text in Middle:

“Our advanced research and technology center in Arizona, supported by our core
LCD business, is the cornerstone of ongoing LCD enhancements and an incubator
for commercializing innovative display technologies of tomorrow.”

      Middle: (Heading)

“Innovation To Meet The Demands of Tomorrow’s Dynamic Markets: Microdisplays”

      Text in Middle:

“Market-driven proprietary technologies, including LCoS(TM) microdisplays and LCiD displays, are based on Three-Five’s core competencies in design and manufacturing. Microdisplays are tiny LCDs with high resolution that are magnified for individual or group viewing. Our LCoS microdisplays are being assessed by major OEM customers for various applications, including AV projectors, HDTV screens, computer monitors, and virtual, full-page displays for use in cell phones and other communications products.”

      Bottom: Diagram describing the mechanics of Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS) microdisplays

      Bottom text:

“Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS) is a technology that merges the high-density resolution of silicon integrated circuits with liquid crystal displays. LCoS combines the benefits of high performance, low cost, and low power consumption.”

Bottom left: Picture of an LCoS handheld device

Text beneath picture of LCoS picture: “Example of a potential mobile Internet appliance with a full SVGA resolution microdisplay and a mousepad.”

Gatefold Page

Upper-left: (Heading) “Evolutionary Display Technologies”

Middle: Arranged under the heading, “LCD Modules Customized For Today’s Growing Markets” are pictures of a printer, cellular phone and MP3 player in which our display technology has been incorporated. The pictures have captions superimposed on them with text above the captions and pictures.

Left margin: (Caption) “LCD Display with LED Lamp”; above the caption is text that reads, “Since our beginning in the mid-1980s, Three-Five has offered customers a variety of information display solutions. These solutions include LCDs integrated with LED devices and other components. Soon after our inception, we began to drive the evolution of our display capabilities away from standard LED products and into custom LCDs.”

Left-middle: (Caption) “LCD — Liquid Crystal Display”; above the caption is text that reads, “LCDs are today’s predominant flat panel display technology. We produce TN, STN, FSTN and DSTN, as well as color and monochrome LCDs at our automated, high-volume manufacturing facility in Arizona, the largest of its kind in North America.”

Middle: (Caption) “LCiD(TM) — Liquid Crystal intense Display”; above the caption is text that reads, “Our LCiD(TM) display was one of the first products developed by our highly experienced research and technology team in Arizona in 1997. This display resembles a brightly-colored LED, but offers customers the low power requirements of an LCD combined with sunlight readability and customized colors.”

Right: Under the heading, “Microdisplays For Newly Emerging Markets” is text that reads, “The most exciting technology yet to emerge from our research laboratories is the LCoS microdisplay. Our LCoS technology has the ability to deliver millions of pixels of information with clear resolution on a space about the size of a thumbnail. The applications for this low-cost technology are many and range from business projector systems to a variety of portable communications devices. The potential for LCoS rests in future products both in existing and emerging markets. Potential applications include rear projection computer monitors, rear and front projection digital TV, and head-mounted displays for computers, games, and movies. Data viewers for wireless portable information devices such as cell phones are believed to have the highest market potential. Other applications include head-mounted displays for flight, flight simulation, equipment maintenance, and medicine.” Under the text are pictures of a monitor, a rear projection display and a hand held internet access device incorporating LCoS microdisplays bearing the caption “LCoS(TM) — Liquid Crystal on Silicon” superimposed on them.

Bottom-left: (Heading) “Expanding Markets”. Beneath the heading are sub-headings with text. The sub-headings and text read, “Communications/Computing: mobile radios, pagers, global positioning systems, cellular phones, cordless phones, feature phones, remote controls, personal digital assistants; Office Automation: mail processing equipment, data storage devices, printers, multifunction peripherals, facsimile machines, photo copiers, scanners, computer peripherals; Industrial: temperature controllers, industrial ovens, portable controllers, vehicle instrumentation, gas pumps, scales, chart recorders; Medical: patient monitors and controls, digital assistants, diagnostic equipment, digital thermometers and glucometers, oximeters, infusion systems; Point of Sale: test & measurement, point-of-sale terminals, barcode scanners, transaction terminals, electronic shelf labeling; Consumer: white goods, brown goods, audio systems, video systems, home theater, radios.”

Bottom-left:“Rear-Projection: large format monitors, digital television, high-definition television, projection television, and display cubes. Front-Projection: portable audio-visual projectors, and home theater. Portable: mobile Internet appliances, wireless convergence products, commercial/industrial wearable computers, and personal DVD viewers.”


Table of Contents

     You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information in this document may only be accurate on the date of this document.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
Page

Prospectus Summary 2
Risk Factors 5
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 16
Use of Proceeds 16
Price Range of Common Stock 17
Dividend Policy 17
Capitalization 18
Selected Consolidated Financial Data 19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 20
Business 28
Management 41
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers 44
Underwriting 46
Legal Matters 47
Experts 47
Where You Can Find More Information 48
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference 48
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements F-1

      All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Three-Five,” or “the Company” in this prospectus mean Three-Five Systems, Inc. and all entities owned or controlled by Three-Five Systems, Inc., except where it is clear that the term means only the parent company.

      Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus reflects a four-for-three stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend in December 1999, reflects the completion of a three-for-two stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend on or about May 12, 2000 to stockholders of record on May 1, 2000, and assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option to purchase up to 390,000 additional shares of common stock.

      The triangle logo, Three-Five and the triangle logo, and LCiD® are registered trademarks of Three-Five, and LCoS™ and LCoS™ stylized are trademarks of Three-Five. This prospectus also includes trademarks, service marks, and trade names of other companies.

1


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

      This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus carefully. This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Introduction

      We are a leading worldwide supplier of custom designed and manufactured display modules for use in the end products of original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. We currently specialize in custom liquid crystal display, or LCD, components and technology. We collaborate closely with our customers in providing our design and manufacturing services. Our LCD modules are used in mobile handsets and other wireless communication devices as well as in the data collection, medical electronics, and other commercial and consumer marketplaces. In addition to our traditional LCD module business, we are pursuing the commercialization of our liquid crystal on silicon, or LCoS , microdisplays following substantial research and development over the past three years. We market our services in North America, Europe, and Asia through a direct technical sales force. Motorola is our largest customer.

      We believe we are well positioned to expand our custom LCD module business through securing new customers and increasing our business with existing customers. Our facilities, technology, and personnel enable us to design, develop, and manufacture, on a timely and cost-effective basis, a wide range of innovative, distinctive, and high-quality display modules that our customers require in their end products. Our Arizona headquarters includes the largest high-volume LCD manufacturing line in North America and a research and technology center dedicated to custom design engineering and development of advanced display technology. Our new manufacturing facility in Beijing, China substantially increases our capacity and complements our long-standing manufacturing facility in Manila, the Philippines. We operate our highly automated, high-volume LCD manufacturing line in Arizona to produce the majority of our LCDs. We utilize advanced, flexible manufacturing systems for high-volume module assembly in Manila and Beijing. We believe our three manufacturing facilities provide us with a competitive advantage in meeting the custom LCD needs of our customers.

      Our technological capabilities closely coupled with our LCD manufacturing expertise have been essential to our ability to develop and commercialize new types of displays. We are engaged in research and development efforts on several types of new display technologies, including reflective color LCDs, color-filter LCDs, plastic LCDs, monochrome LCDs with a paper-white background, bi-stable LCDs, and organic and polymer light emitting displays. We will continue to undertake some of these initiatives with partners and in strategic alliances.

      We are pursuing the commercialization of our LCoS microdisplay technology. This technology addresses market demands for high-information content, power-efficient displays with increased functionality and smaller sizes at relatively low costs. LCoS microdisplays are no larger than a thumbnail, but contain all of the information appearing on a high-resolution personal computer screen. The tiny image on an LCoS microdisplay can be projected onto a screen or other surface for individual or group viewing or used in a portable application and viewed through a magnifying device similar to a viewfinder. We are working with various international OEMs on LCoS microdisplay product offerings for a broad range of applications for anticipated introduction during the next six to twelve months. Initial applications are expected to include use in business projection equipment and computer monitors. Other potential applications include the use of LCoS microdisplays in digital and high-definition televisions and in a wide variety of portable devices, such as wireless Internet access devices, mobile handsets, pagers, and personal digital assistants, or PDAs, as well as in wearable computing equipment.

2


Table of Contents

      Our strategy is to enhance our position as a leading worldwide supplier of custom designed and manufactured displays for application in various high-growth segments of the electronics industry. Key elements of our strategy include the following:

  •  targeting leading companies in high-growth industries;
 
  •  intensifying our efforts to expand our customer base;
 
  •  emphasizing strong and long-lasting customer relationships that enable us to become seamless extensions of our customers’ design and manufacturing functions;
 
  •  combining domestic design and prototyping with low-cost, high-volume production capacity through the use of advanced computer-aided design software and advanced, efficient, and highly automated production processes;
 
  •  emphasizing innovative design and manufacturing techniques to improve the speed, efficiency, and performance of our design and manufacturing services; and
 
  •  emphasizing the development of new display technologies to meet customers’ continual requirements for higher information content and lower costs.

We believe our strategy has enabled us to provide our customers with displays that have competitive advantages in terms of size, cost, and product differentiation.

      We maintain our principal executive offices at 1600 North Desert Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85281, and our telephone number is (602) 389-8600. Our Web site is located at www.threefive.com. Information contained on our Web site does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

The Offering

 
Common stock offered 2,600,000 shares
 
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering 21,566,930 shares
 
Use of proceeds To increase our manufacturing capacity through the expansion of facilities and the acquisition of equipment; to fund the continued development of our LCoS microdisplay technology and develop new display or display-related technologies; and to provide additional working capital to finance the expansion of our business. We may expand our manufacturing capacity and technology development in part through strategic acquisitions, investments, and alliances, but have no current plans to do so.
 
New York Stock Exchange symbol TFS

      The total number of shares that we assume will be outstanding after the offering excludes (a) 1,797,108 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2000, with a weighted average exercise price of $10.09 per share, (b) 539,052 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our stock option plans, and (c) 140,000 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price of $8.47 per share.

3


Table of Contents

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

(in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                           
Three Months
Years Ended December 31, Ended March 31,


1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000







Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales $ 91,585 $ 60,713 $ 84,642 $ 95,047 $ 147,408 $ 23,044 $ 39,162







Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 70,481 58,321 64,760 76,149 117,583 20,191 29,360
Selling, general, and administrative 5,386 5,351 6,557 7,334 11,170 2,449 2,262
Research, development, and engineering 2,396 4,065 5,106 7,159 8,745 1,821 2,763







78,263 67,737 76,423 90,642 137,498 24,461 34,385







Operating income (loss) 13,322 (7,024 ) 8,219 4,405 9,910 (1,417 ) 4,777
Other income (expense), net 643 273 358 (42 ) (18 ) (185 ) 580







Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 13,965 (6,751 ) 8,577 4,363 9,892 (1,602 ) 5,357
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 5,548 (2,920 ) 3,334 1,773 2,968 (960 ) 1,770







Net income (loss) $ 8,417 $ (3,831 ) $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924 $ (642 ) $ 3,587







Earnings (loss) per common share(1):
Basic $ 0.55 $ (0.25 ) $ 0.33 $ 0.17 $ 0.44 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.19







Diluted $ 0.52 $ (0.25 ) $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.43 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.18







Weighted average number of common shares(1):
Basic 15,432 15,536 15,708 15,277 15,563 14,018 18,926







Diluted 16,169 15,536 16,180 15,604 16,005 14,018 20,047







                 
March 31, 2000

As
Actual Adjusted(2)


Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 45,413 $ 172,342
Working capital 63,300 190,229
Total assets 129,000 255,929
Total stockholders’ equity 105,761 232,690

(1)  Adjusted for the four-for-three stock split effected in December 1999 and the three-for-two stock split to be effected on or about May 12, 2000 to stockholders of record on May 1, 2000.
 
(2)  Adjusted to reflect the sale of the 2,600,000 shares of common stock offered by us in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $51.67 per share and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses and giving effect to the application of the net proceeds. See “Use of Proceeds” and “Capitalization.”

4


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

      Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that there are risks, including those set forth below. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all the other information included in this prospectus, before you decide to purchase shares of our common stock.

Motorola accounts for a significant portion of our sales.

      Our business depends to a significant extent on Motorola’s success in the mobile handset business, particularly in the various major mobile handset programs in which we participate. Any material delay, cancellation, or reduction of orders from Motorola could have a material adverse effect on our business.

      Motorola has been our largest customer during each of the last five years. Sales to Motorola accounted for approximately 84.9% of our net sales in the first three months of 2000, 86.1% in 1999, 63.6% in 1998, 34.6% in 1997, 65.1% in 1996, and 80.5% in 1995. Throughout this period, substantially all of our sales to Motorola were for mobile handset applications.

      We anticipate that sales to Motorola in 2000 will exceed 1999 levels and that the percentage of our net sales attributable to Motorola will stay in the current range for the remainder of 2000 as a result of increased worldwide demand for mobile handsets. Sales to Motorola currently are made under multiple product programs administered by eight buyers operating in eight separate plants. During the first three months of 2000, the five largest of these product programs accounted for a total of 79.5% of our net sales, with the largest program accounting for 27.0% of our net sales. During 1999, the five largest of these product programs accounted for a total of 79.1% of our net sales, with the largest program accounting for 33.0% of our net sales.

      A decline in sales to Motorola could occur at any time. For example, an unexpected reduction in Motorola mobile handset programs reduced our net sales to Motorola from $73.7 million in 1995 to $39.5 million in 1996 and $29.2 million in 1997. Since Motorola has no long-term contractual commitments to purchase any of our products, we could experience similar declines in our net sales in the future.

We are subject to lengthy development periods and product acceptance cycles.

      We sell our display modules to OEMs, which then incorporate them into the products they sell. OEMs make the determination during their product development programs whether to incorporate our display modules or pursue other alternatives. This requires us to make significant investments of time and capital in the custom design of display modules well before our customers introduce their products incorporating these displays and before we can be sure that we will generate any significant sales to our customers or even recover our investment. During a customer’s entire product development process, we face the risk that our display will fail to meet our customer’s technical, performance, or cost requirements or will be replaced by a competing product or alternative technological solution. Even if we complete our design process in a manner satisfactory to our customer, the customer may delay or terminate its product development efforts. The occurrence of any of these events would adversely affect our operating results.

We do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers.

      Our customers, including Motorola, generally do not provide us with firm, long-term volume purchase commitments. Although we have begun to enter into more manufacturing contracts with our customers, these contracts clarify order lead times, inventory risk allocation, and similar matters rather than provide firm, long-term volume purchase commitments. As a result, customers can cancel purchase commitments or reduce or delay orders at any time. The cancellation, delay, or reduction of customer commitments could result in our holding excess and obsolete inventory or having unabsorbed manufacturing overhead. The large percentage of our sales to customers in the electronics industry, which is subject to severe competitive pressures, rapid technological change, and product obsolescence, increases our inventory and overhead risks.

      Our operating results have been materially and adversely affected in the past as a result of the failure to obtain anticipated orders and deferrals or cancellations of purchase commitments because of changes in

5


Table of Contents

customer requirements. For example, we made two announcements in 1998 that sales would not meet our expectations because of delays in customer programs.

We depend on the market acceptance of the products of our customers.

      We do not sell any products to end users. Instead, we design and manufacture various product solutions that our customers incorporate into their products. As a result, our success depends almost entirely upon the widespread market acceptance of our customers’ products. Any significant slowdown in the demand for our customers’ products would adversely affect our business.

      Because our success depends on the widespread market acceptance of our customers’ products, we must identify industries that have significant growth potential and establish relationships with OEMs in those industries. Our failure to identify potential growth opportunities or establish relationships with OEMs in those industries would adversely affect our business.

      Our dependence on the success of the products of our customers exposes us to a variety of risks, including the following:

  •  our ability to provide significant design and manufacturing services for customers on a timely and cost-effective basis;
 
  •  our success in maintaining customer satisfaction with our design and manufacturing services;
 
  •  our ability to match our design and manufacturing capacity with customer demand and to maintain satisfactory delivery schedules;
 
  •  customer order patterns, changes in order mix, and the level and timing of orders placed by customers that we can complete in a quarter; and
 
  •  the cyclical nature of the industries and markets we serve.

Our failure to address these risks may cause our sales to decline.

Our emerging microdisplay business may not be successful.

      A key element of our current business plan involves the commercialization of our microdisplay technology. The success of this effort depends on numerous factors. As a result, we could be unable to expand our business as we currently anticipate and may make substantial investments in product development, manufacturing, and marketing efforts that may not result in microdisplay sales.

      Manufacturing an LCoS microdisplay involves a significantly different procedure than manufacturing a typical liquid crystal display. Although we added additional equipment to our Arizona manufacturing facility in the last two years for manufacturing LCoS microdisplays, the manufacture of microdisplays will require us to overcome numerous challenges, including the following:

  •  the use of new materials, including silicon;
 
  •  the modification of equipment and processes to accommodate the miniature size of the product;
 
  •  the implementation of new manufacturing techniques;
 
  •  the incorporation of new handling procedures;
 
  •  the maintenance of cleaner manufacturing environments; and
 
  •  the ability to master tighter tolerances in the manufacturing process.

      We could experience significant problems in commencing volume production of LCoS microdisplays. These problems could result in the delay of the full implementation of high-volume LCoS microdisplay production. In addition, lower than expected manufacturing yields could significantly and adversely affect us because of the relatively high cost of the silicon backplanes used in LCoS microdisplays.

6


Table of Contents

      Various target markets for our microdisplays, including projectors, monitors, digital and high-definition televisions, and portable microdisplays, are uncertain, may be slow to develop, or could utilize competing technologies. Many manufacturers have well-established positions in the projector and monitor markets. As a result, we must provide these manufacturers with lower cost, comparable performance microdisplays for their products. Digital and high-definition television has only recently become available to consumers, and widespread market acceptance is uncertain. Penetrating this market will require us to offer lower cost alternatives to existing technology. In addition, the commercial success of the portable microdisplay market is uncertain. Gaining acceptance in this market may prove difficult because of the radically different approach of microdisplays to the presentation of information. The failure of any of these target markets to develop as we expect, or our failure to penetrate these markets, will impede our anticipated sales growth. Even if our technology successfully meets our price and performance goals, our customers may not achieve commercial success in selling their products that incorporate our microdisplay technology.

We face intense competition.

      We serve intensely competitive industries that are characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, and competition from major domestic and international companies. This intense competition could result in pricing pressures, lower sales, reduced margins, and lower market share. Many of our competitors have greater market recognition, larger customer bases, and substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, and other resources than we possess. As a result, they may be able to introduce new products and respond to customer requirements more quickly than we can.

      Our competitive position could suffer if one or more of our customers decide to design and manufacture their own display modules, to use standard devices, to contract with our competitors, or to use alternative technologies. In addition, our customers typically develop a second source, even for displays we design for them. These second source suppliers may win an increasing share of a program, particularly as it grows and matures, by competing primarily on price rather than on design capability.

      Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, both within and outside our control. These factors include the following:

  •  our success in designing and manufacturing new product solutions, including those implementing new technologies;
 
  •  our ability to address the needs of our customers;
 
  •  the quality, performance, reliability, features, ease of use, pricing, and diversity of our product solutions;
 
  •  foreign currency fluctuations, which may cause a foreign competitor’s products to be priced significantly lower than our product solutions;
 
  •  the quality of our customer services;
 
  •  our efficiency of production;
 
  •  the rate at which customers incorporate our product solutions into their own products; and
 
  •  product or technology introductions by our competitors.

Shortages of components and materials may delay or reduce our sales and increase our costs.

      Our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and other materials necessary to produce our displays could result in reduced or delayed sales or lost orders. Any delay in or loss of sales could adversely impact our operating results. We obtain many of the materials we use in the manufacture of our displays from a limited number of foreign suppliers, particularly suppliers located in Asia, and we do not have long-term supply contracts with any of them. As a result, we are subject to economic instability and currency fluctuations in these Asian countries as well as to increased costs, supply interruptions, and difficulties in

7


Table of Contents

obtaining materials. Our customers also may encounter difficulties or increased costs in obtaining from others the materials necessary to produce their products into which our product solutions are incorporated.

      Materials and components for some of our major programs from time to time have been subject to allocation because of shortages of these materials and components. During 1998, we occasionally delayed sales of our LCD modules as a result of the unavailability of LCD polarizers and IC drivers, or ASICs. During 1999 and the first quarter of 2000, we experienced difficulties obtaining our requirements for ASICs as a result of a worldwide shortage. These shortages resulted in lost sales opportunities. Similar shortages in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We must maintain satisfactory manufacturing yields and capacity.

      Our inability to maintain high levels of productivity or satisfactory delivery schedules at our manufacturing facilities in Manila, Beijing, or Arizona would adversely affect our operating results. The design and manufacture of LCDs and display modules are highly complex processes that are sensitive to a wide variety of factors, including the level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment, impurities in the materials used, and the performance of personnel and equipment. As is typical in the industry, at times we have experienced lower than anticipated manufacturing yields and lengthening of delivery schedules. We may encounter lower manufacturing yields and longer delivery schedules as we continue to ramp up our high-volume LCD line to greater production levels and begin to manufacture LCoS microdisplays. In addition, the complexity of manufacturing processes will increase along with increases in the sophistication of display modules.

      We anticipate that we will expand our capacity by establishing one or more additional production facilities. We will face all of the risks inherent in constructing, equipping, and commencing operations in any new facilities that we establish. These risks include the following:

  •  the ability to identify and acquire or lease suitable property;
 
  •  construction delays and cost overruns;
 
  •  the ability to procure and install necessary equipment;
 
  •  the ability to hire, train, and manage manufacturing personnel; and
 
  •  production delays, unfavorable manufacturing yields, and lengthening delivery schedules.

These risks could be more pronounced with respect to any facilities that we establish in foreign countries. Any problems with our LCD manufacturing operations could result in the lengthening of our delivery schedules, reductions in the quality or performance of our design and manufacturing services, and reduced customer satisfaction.

Our business depends on new products and technologies.

      We operate in rapidly changing industries. Technological advances, the introduction of new products, and new design and manufacturing techniques could adversely affect our business unless we are able to adapt to the changing conditions. As a result, we will be required to expend substantial funds for and commit significant resources to

  •  continue research and development activities on existing and potential product solutions;
 
  •  engage additional engineering and other technical personnel;
 
  •  purchase advanced design, production, and test equipment; and
 
  •  expand our manufacturing capacity.

      Our future operating results will depend to a significant extent on our ability to continue to provide new product solutions that compare favorably on the basis of time to introduction, cost, and performance with the

8


Table of Contents

design and manufacturing capabilities of OEMs and competitive third-party suppliers. Our success in attracting new customers and developing new business depends on various factors, including the following:

  •  utilization of advances in technology;
 
  •  innovative development of new solutions for customer products;
 
  •  efficient and cost-effective services; and
 
  •  timely completion of the design and manufacture of new product solutions.

Our efforts to develop new technologies may not result in commercial success.

      Our research and development efforts with respect to new technologies may not result in customer or widespread market acceptance. Some or all of those technologies may not successfully make the transition from the research and development lab to cost-effective production as a result of technology problems, competitive cost issues, yield problems, and other factors. Even when we successfully complete a research and development effort with respect to a particular technology, our customers may determine not to introduce or may terminate products utilizing the technology for a variety of reasons, including the following:

  •  difficulties with other suppliers of components for the products;
 
  •  superior technologies developed by our competitors;
 
  •  price considerations;
 
  •  lack of anticipated or actual market demand for the products; and
 
  •  unfavorable comparisons with products introduced by others.

      For example, in 1999 we deferred the commercialization of our Liquid Crystal active Drive, or LCaD®, display product line. We have decided to concentrate our resources elsewhere and have not yet determined whether or to what extent we will pursue commercialization of the LCaD product line.

      The nature of our business requires us to make capital expenditures and investments for new technologies. For example, our capital expenditures, including tooling and licenses, for LCoS microdisplays, currently our largest research and development effort, have been over $8.0 million through March 31, 2000. To facilitate the development of our LCoS microdisplay products, we also made an equity investment of $3.8 million in Inviso, Inc., formerly Siliscape, Inc., during 1998 and 2000 and purchased assets and technology of the former Light Valve business unit of National Semiconductor Corporation for approximately $3.6 million during 1999. We may be required to make similar investments and acquisitions in the future to maintain or enhance our ability to offer technological solutions.

      Significant expenditures relating to one or more new technologies, especially LCoS microdisplays, that ultimately prove to be unsuccessful for any reason could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, any investments or acquisitions, such as Inviso and the assets and technology of the former Light Valve business unit, made to enhance our technologies may prove to be unsuccessful.

We face risks associated with international operations.

      Our manufacturing operations in Manila, Beijing, and Arizona and our sales and distribution operations in Europe and Asia create a number of logistical and communications challenges. Our international operations also expose us to various economic, political, and other risks, including the following:

  •  management of a multi-national organization;
 
  •  compliance with local laws and regulatory requirements as well as changes in those laws and requirements;
 
  •  employment and severance issues;
 
  •  overlap of tax issues;
 
  •  tariffs and duties;

9


Table of Contents

  •  possible employee turnover or labor unrest;
 
  •  lack of developed infrastructure;
 
  •  the burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws; and
 
  •  political or economic instability in certain parts of the world.

      Changes in policies by the United States or foreign governments resulting in, among other things, increased duties, higher taxation, currency conversion limitations, restrictions on the transfer or repatriation of funds, limitations on imports or exports, or the expropriation of private enterprises also could have a material adverse effect on us. Any actions by our host countries to reverse policies that encourage foreign investment or foreign trade also could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, U.S. trade policies, such as “most favored nation” status and trade preferences for certain Asian nations, could affect the attractiveness of our services to our U.S. customers.

We depend on our operations in Arizona.

      Our Arizona facility and its high-volume LCD manufacturing line are critical to our success. We utilize this high-volume line to produce a majority of our own requirements for LCDs. We also have installed a dedicated high-volume microdisplay manufacturing line in this facility. We intend, at least initially, to produce all of our LCoS microdisplays on this dedicated line. This facility also houses our principal research, development, engineering, design, and managerial operations. Any event that causes a disruption of the operation of this facility for even a relatively short period of time would adversely affect our ability to provide both technical and manufacturing support for our customers.

We depend on our manufacturing operations in the Philippines.

      Any disruption or termination of our manufacturing operations in Manila or air transportation with the Philippines, even for a relatively short period of time, would adversely affect our operations. The Philippines have been subject to volcanic eruptions, typhoons, and substantial civil disturbances, including attempted military coups against the government, since we commenced operations at the facility in 1986. We have made cumulative capital investments in the Philippines amounting to approximately $15.2 million through March 31, 2000. We believe that our manufacturing operations in Manila constitute one of our most important resources and that it would be difficult to replace the low-cost, high-performance facility or the highly trained production staff in the event of the disruption or termination of our manufacturing operations in Manila.

      Our operations in Manila also depend on the business and financial condition of the third-party subcontractor that owns the manufacturing facility, which is located on land the subcontractor leases from the Philippine government. The subcontractor operates the facility utilizing equipment, processes, and documentation that we own and supervisory personnel that we employ. The subcontractor provides us with direct production personnel and leases space to us. The subcontractor also utilizes additional space in the facility to produce products for other entities unrelated to us. The failure of the subcontractor to fulfill its obligations to us would adversely affect our operating results. Our agreements with the subcontractor extend through December 31, 2000 and are renewable from year to year thereafter, but may be terminated by the subcontractor or us upon 180 days written notice.

      We are considering establishing our own production facility in Manila during the last half of 2000. In such event, we would likely retain our existing facility because of expected capacity requirements in 2001.

We depend on our manufacturing operations in China.

      We commenced manufacturing operations in Beijing, China, during 1998 in a leased temporary facility. During 1999, we completed the construction of a permanent, high-volume LCD module manufacturing facility in Beijing, which is similar to our Manila facility. We have made cumulative capital investments in

10


Table of Contents

China amounting to approximately $11.0 million through March 31, 2000. We are considering expansion of our Beijing manufacturing facility.

      Our operations and assets are subject to significant political, economic, legal, and other uncertainties in China. The Chinese government recently has been pursuing economic reform policies, including the encouragement of foreign trade and investment and greater economic decentralization. The Chinese government, however, may not continue to pursue these policies, may not successfully pursue these policies, or may significantly alter these policies from time to time. China currently does not have a comprehensive and highly developed system of laws, particularly with respect to foreign investment activities and foreign trade. Enforcement of existing and future laws and contracts is uncertain, and implementation and interpretation of laws may be inconsistent. As the Chinese legal system develops, the passage of new laws, changes in existing laws, and the preemption of local regulations by national laws may adversely affect us. We also could be adversely affected by a number of other factors, including the following:

  •  the imposition of austerity measures intended to reduce inflation;
 
  •  inadequate development or maintenance of infrastructure, including the unavailability of adequate power and water supplies, transportation, raw materials, and parts; and
 
  •  a deterioration of the general political, economic, or social environment in China.

      In November 1999, the United States and China signed an agreement that will lift trade barriers between the two countries and that advances China’s efforts to join the World Trade Organization. Special interest groups have raised objections to these efforts and we cannot be certain whether or to what extent trade relations with China will continue to improve. Any developments that adversely affect trade relations between the United States and China in the future could adversely affect us by increasing the cost to U.S. customers of products manufactured by us in China.

We face risks associated with international trade and currency exchange.

      Political and economic conditions abroad may adversely affect the foreign manufacture and sale of our displays. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or foreign countries, such as a change in the current tariff structures, export or import compliance laws, or other trade policies, could adversely affect our ability to manufacture or sell displays in foreign markets and to purchase materials or equipment from foreign suppliers.

      While we transact business predominantly in U.S. dollars and bill and collect most of our sales in U.S. dollars, we collect a portion of our revenue in non-U.S. currencies, such as the Chinese renminbi. In the future, customers increasingly may make payments in non-U.S. currencies, such as the Euro. In addition, we account for a portion of our costs, such as payroll, rent, and indirect operating costs, in non-U.S. currencies, including Philippine pesos, British pounds sterling, and Chinese renminbi.

      Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our cost of goods and operating margins and could result in exchange losses. In addition, currency devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of that currency. The Philippine peso suffered a major devaluation in late 1997, and the Chinese renminbi has experienced significant devaluation against most major currencies over the last five years. Hedging foreign currencies can be difficult, especially if the currency is not freely traded. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results.

      The risks described above are particularly important since international sales represented 81.2% of our net sales in the first three months of 2000 and 82.0% of our net sales in 1999. Sales in foreign markets, primarily Europe and China, to OEMs based in the United States accounted for almost all of our international sales in both of these periods. In the future, we expect sales to OEMs based in Europe and China to increase.

Variability of customer requirements may adversely affect our operating results.

      Custom manufacturers for OEMs must provide increasingly rapid product turnaround and respond to ever-shorter lead times. A variety of conditions, both specific to individual customers and generally affecting

11


Table of Contents

the demand for their products, may cause customers to cancel, reduce, or delay orders. Cancellations, reductions, or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers could adversely affect our business. On occasion, customers require rapid increases in production, which can strain our resources and reduce our margins. Although we have increased our manufacturing capacity, we may lack sufficient capacity at any given time to meet our customers’ demands if their demands exceed anticipated levels.

Our operating results have significant fluctuations.

      In addition to the variability resulting from the short-term nature of our customers’ commitments, other factors contribute to significant periodic and seasonal quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations. These factors include the following:

  •  the timing of orders;
 
  •  the volume of orders relative to our capacity;
 
  •  product introductions and market acceptance of new products or new generations of products;
 
  •  evolution in the life cycles of customers’ products;
 
  •  timing of expenditures in anticipation of future orders;
 
  •  effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes;
 
  •  changes in cost and availability of labor and components;
 
  •  product mix;
 
  •  pricing and availability of competitive products and services; and
 
  •  changes or anticipated changes in economic conditions.

      Accordingly, you should not rely on the results of any past periods as an indication of our future performance. It is likely that in some future period, our operating results may be below expectations of public market analysts or investors. If this occurs, our stock price may drop.

We must effectively manage our growth.

      The failure to manage our growth effectively could adversely affect our operations. We have increased the number of our manufacturing and design programs and plan to expand further the number and diversity of our programs in the future. Our ability to manage our planned growth effectively will require us to

  •  enhance our operational, financial, and management systems;
 
  •  expand our facilities and equipment; and
 
  •  successfully hire, train, and motivate additional employees, including the technical personnel necessary to operate our new production facility in Beijing.

      The expansion and diversification of our product and customer base may result in increases in our overhead and selling expenses. We also may be required to increase staffing and other expenses as well as our expenditures on capital equipment and leasehold improvements in order to meet the anticipated demand of our customers. For example, prior to the receipt of orders, we substantially increased our manufacturing capacity in 1998 by starting up manufacturing operations in Beijing. We plan further expansion of our manufacturing capacity. Customers, however, generally do not commit to firm production schedules for more than a short time in advance. Any increase in expenditures in anticipation of future orders that do not materialize would adversely affect our profitability. Customers also may require rapid increases in design and production services that place an excessive short-term burden on our resources.

12


Table of Contents

We depend on key personnel.

      Our development and operations depend substantially on the efforts and abilities of our senior management and technical personnel. The competition for qualified management and technical personnel is intense. The loss of services of one or more of our key employees or the inability to add key personnel, including those required for our LCD manufacturing facility, could have a material adverse effect on us. Although we maintain non-competition and nondisclosure covenants with certain key personnel, we do not have any fixed-term agreements with, or key person life insurance covering, any officer or employee.

We must protect our intellectual property, and others could infringe on or misappropriate our rights.

      We believe that our continued success depends in part on protecting our proprietary technology. Third parties could claim that we are infringing their patents or other intellectual property rights. In the event that a third party alleges that we are infringing its rights, we may not be able to obtain licenses on commercially reasonable terms from the third party, if at all, or the third party may commence litigation against us. The failure to obtain necessary licenses or other rights or the institution of litigation arising out of such claims could materially and adversely affect us.

      We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property. We seek to protect certain of our technology under trade secret laws, which afford only limited protection. We face risks associated with our intellectual property, including the following:

  •  pending patent applications may not be issued;
 
  •  intellectual property laws may not protect our intellectual property rights;
 
  •  third parties may challenge, invalidate, or circumvent any patent issued to us;
 
  •  rights granted under patents issued to us may not provide competitive advantages to us;
 
  •  unauthorized parties may attempt to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights;
 
  •  others may independently develop similar technology or design around any patents issued to us; and
 
  •  effective protection of intellectual property rights may be limited or unavailable in some foreign countries, such as China, in which we operate.

      We may not be able to obtain effective trademark, service mark, copyright, and trade secret protection in every country in which we sell our products. We may find it necessary to take legal action in the future to enforce or protect our intellectual property rights or to defend against claims of infringement. Litigation can be very expensive and can distract our management’s time and attention, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, we may not be able to obtain a favorable outcome in any intellectual property litigation.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile.

      The market price of our common stock has been extremely volatile. Our stock price increased dramatically during the three-year period ended December 31, 1994, but declined significantly during 1995 and 1996. The stock price increased again during 1997, but declined significantly in 1998. Our stock price again increased significantly during 1999 and the first three months of 2000. The trading price of our common stock in the future could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, including the following:

  •  variations in our quarterly operating results;
 
  •  actual or anticipated announcements of technical innovations or new product developments by us or our competitors;
 
  •  changes in analysts’ estimates of our financial performance;

13


Table of Contents

  •  general conditions in the electronics industry; and
 
  •  worldwide economic and financial conditions.

      In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices for many high-technology companies and that often have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations and other factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The electronics industry is cyclical.

      The electronics industry has experienced significant economic downturns at various times, characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices, and production over-capacity. In addition, the electronics industry is cyclical in nature. We have sought to reduce our exposure to industry downturns and cyclicality by providing design and production services for leading companies in rapidly expanding segments of the electronics industry. We may, however, experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results because of general industry conditions or events occurring in the general economy.

We must finance the growth of our business and the development of new products.

      To remain competitive, we must continue to make significant investments in research and development, equipment, and facilities. As a result of the increase in fixed costs and operating expenses related to these capital expenditures, our failure to increase sufficiently our net sales to offset these increased costs would adversely affect our operating results.

      From time to time, we may seek additional equity or debt financing to provide for the capital expenditures required to maintain or expand our design and production facilities and equipment. We cannot predict the timing or amount of any such capital requirements at this time. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to expand our business or to develop new business at the rate desired and our operating results may suffer. Debt financing increases expenses and must be repaid regardless of operating results. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing stockholders.

Potential strategic alliances may not achieve their objectives.

      We anticipate that we will enter into various strategic alliances. Among other matters, we will explore strategic alliances designed to enhance or complement our technology or to work in conjunction with our technology; to increase our manufacturing capacity; to provide necessary know-how, components, or supplies; and to develop, introduce, and distribute products utilizing our technology. Any strategic alliances may not achieve their strategic objectives, and parties to our strategic alliances may not perform as contemplated.

Any acquisitions that we undertake could be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value, and harm our operating results.

      We expect to review opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that would complement our current products, expand the breadth of our markets or enhance our technical capabilities, or may otherwise offer growth opportunities. While we have no current agreements or negotiations underway, we may buy businesses, products or technologies in the future. If we make any future acquisitions, we could issue stock that would dilute existing stockholders’ percentage ownership, incur substantial debt, or assume contingent liabilities. Our experience in acquiring other businesses and technologies is limited. Potential acquisitions also involve numerous risks, including the following:

  •  problems assimilating the purchased operations, technologies, or products;
 
  •  unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition;
 
  •  diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses;

14


Table of Contents

  •  adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
 
  •  risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and
 
  •  potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations.

      We cannot assure you that we would be successful in overcoming problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions, and our inability to do so could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to environmental regulations.

      Our operations result in the creation of small amounts of hazardous waste, including various epoxies, gases, inks, solvents, and other wastes. Any failure by us to control the use, or adequately restrict the discharge, of hazardous substances could subject us to future liabilities. We are subject to federal, state, and local governmental regulations related to the use, storage, discharge, and disposal of toxic, volatile, or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in our design and manufacturing processes. The amount of hazardous waste produced by us may increase in the future depending on changes in our operations. Our failure to comply with present or future environmental regulations could result in the imposition of fines, suspension of production, or a cessation of operations. Compliance with these regulations could require us to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses.

The application of the net proceeds of this offering is uncertain.

      We plan to use the net proceeds of this offering to increase our manufacturing capacity through the expansion of facilities and the acquisition of equipment; to fund the continued development of our LCoS microdisplay technology and to develop new display or display-related technologies; and to provide additional working capital to finance the expansion of our business. We may expand our manufacturing capacity and technology development in part through strategic acquisitions, investments, and alliances. We do not, however, have any commitments respecting capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, or alliances. As a result, management will have wide discretion in the application of the net proceeds of this offering and investors will not have the opportunity to assess the use of proceeds of this offering. Our management may not utilize the proceeds in an effective manner, and the use of the proceeds may not increase our profitability or market value.

Change in control provisions may adversely affect existing stockholders.

      Our restated certificate of incorporation and the Delaware General Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of making more difficult or delaying attempts by others to obtain control of our company, even when these attempts may be in the best interests of stockholders. Our restated certificate also authorizes the board of directors, without stockholder approval, to issue one or more series of preferred stock, which could have voting and conversion rights that adversely affect or dilute the voting power of the holders of common stock. Delaware law also imposes conditions on certain business combination transactions with “interested stockholders.”

Sales of large numbers of shares could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

      All of our outstanding shares are freely tradeable without restriction or further registration. Affiliates must sell all shares they own in compliance with the volume and other requirements of Rule 144, except for the holding period requirements. Our directors and executive officers have agreed that for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus, they will not directly or indirectly sell any shares of common stock without the joint consent of Banc of America Securities LLC and Needham & Company, Inc. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our stockholders, or even the potential for such sales, may have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.

15


Table of Contents

We do not pay cash dividends.

      We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate that we will pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Instead, we intend to apply earnings to the expansion and development of our business.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

      Certain statements and information contained in this prospectus regarding revenue, margins, expenses, and earnings analysis for fiscal 2000 and thereafter; technological innovations; future products or product development; our product development strategies; potential acquisitions or strategic alliances; the success of particular product or marketing programs; the amounts of revenue generated as a result of sales to significant customers; and liquidity and anticipated cash needs; and other statements contained in this prospectus regarding matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as such term is defined under applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements, by their very nature, include risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, actual results may differ, perhaps materially, from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include those discussed under “Risk Factors.”

USE OF PROCEEDS

      The net proceeds to us from the sale of our common stock are estimated to be approximately $126.9 million, assuming a public offering price of $51.67 per share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses. We plan to use the net proceeds to increase our manufacturing capacity through the expansion of facilities and the acquisition of equipment; to fund the continued development of our LCoS microdisplay technology and to develop new display or display-related technologies; and to provide additional working capital to finance the expansion of our business. We may expand our manufacturing capacity and technology development in part through strategic acquisitions, investments, and alliances. We do not have any commitments respecting capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, or alliances. Prior to using the net proceeds, we plan to invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest bearing, investment grade securities.

16


Table of Contents

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

      Our common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TFS” since December 29, 1994. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low closing prices of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated, as adjusted for the four-for-three stock split effected in December 1999 and the three-for-two stock split to be effected in May 2000.

                   
High Low


1998:
First Quarter $ 11.53 $ 8.88
Second Quarter 10.19 7.44
Third Quarter 9.09 3.53
Fourth Quarter 6.94 3.25
1999:
First Quarter $ 8.00 $ 4.31
Second Quarter 6.91 4.03
Third Quarter 11.06 6.84
Fourth Quarter 27.33 11.13
2000:
First Quarter $ 43.83 $ 25.46
Second Quarter (Through April 24, 2000) 55.38 36.75

      As of April 24, 2000, there were approximately 780 holders of record and approximately 7,171 beneficial owners of our common stock. The closing sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on April 24, 2000 was $51.67 per share on a split-adjusted basis ($77.50 actual).

DIVIDEND POLICY

      Our policy is to retain earnings to provide funds for the operation and expansion of our business. We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, our credit facility with Imperial Bank does not permit us to pay dividends without the consent of Imperial Bank. The payment of cash dividends in the future will depend on our growth, profitability, financial condition, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

17


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

      The following table sets forth our capitalization at March 31, 2000 and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the 2,600,000 shares of common stock offered by us in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $51.67 per share, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses and giving effect to our receipt and application of the net proceeds:

                       
March 31, 2000

Actual As Adjusted


(in thousands)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding $ $
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 18,992,913 issued and 18,992,324 outstanding, actual; 21,592,913 issued and 21,592,324 outstanding, as adjusted(1)(2) 190 216
Additional paid-in capital 68,343 195,246
Retained earnings 37,226 37,226
Cumulative translation adjustment 5 5
Treasury stock, at cost (589 shares)(2) (3 ) (3 )


Total stockholders’ equity 105,761 232,690


Total capitalization $ 105,761 $ 232,690



(1)  Excludes the following:

  •  1,797,108 shares issuable upon exercise of options outstanding at March 31, 2000 under our stock option plans, with a weighted average exercise price of $10.09 per share;
 
  •  539,052 shares available for future issuance under our stock plans; and
 
  •  140,000 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $8.47 per share.

    For a discussion of our benefit plans, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)  Adjusted for the three-for-two stock split to be effected on or about May 12, 2000 to stockholders of record on May 1, 2000.

18


Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

      The following table contains selected consolidated financial data and is qualified by the more detailed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1997, December 31, 1998, and December 31, 1999 have been derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements, which statements have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, and are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1996 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP but which are not included in this prospectus. Data as of March 31, 2000 and for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000 have been derived from our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and, in our opinion, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2000 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. This data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                                           
Three Months Ended
Years Ended December 31, March 31,


1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000







(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales $ 91,585 $ 60,713 $ 84,642 $ 95,047 $ 147,408 $ 23,044 $ 39,162







Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 70,481 58,321 64,760 76,149 117,583 20,191 29,360
Selling, general, and administrative 5,386 5,351 6,557 7,334 11,170 2,449 2,262
Research, development, and engineering 2,396 4,065 5,106 7,159 8,745 1,821 2,763







78,263 67,737 76,423 90,642 137,498 24,461 34,385







Operating income (loss) 13,322 (7,024 ) 8,219 4,405 9,910 (1,417 ) 4,777
Other income (expense), net 643 273 358 (42 ) (18 ) (185 ) 580







Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 13,965 (6,751 ) 8,577 4,363 9,892 (1,602 ) 5,357
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 5,548 (2,920 ) 3,334 1,773 2,968 (960 ) 1,770







Net income (loss) $ 8,417 $ (3,831 ) $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924 $ (642 ) $ 3,587







Earnings (loss) per common share (1):
Basic $ 0.55 $ (0.25 ) $ 0.33 $ 0.17 $ 0.44 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.19







Diluted $ 0.52 $ (0.25 ) $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.43 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.18







Weighted average number of common shares(1):
Basic 15,432 15,536 15,708 15,277 15,563 14,018 18,926







Diluted 16,169 15,536 16,180 15,604 16,005 14,018 20,047







                 
March 31, 2000

Actual As Adjusted(2)


Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 45,413 $ 172,342
Working capital 63,300 190,229
Total assets 129,000 255,929
Total stockholders’ equity 105,761 232,690

(1)  Adjusted for the four-for-three stock split effected in December 1999 and the three-for-two stock split to be effected on or about May 12, 2000 to stockholders of record on May 1, 2000.
 
(2)  Adjusted to reflect the sale of the 2,600,000 shares of common stock offered by us in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $51.67 per share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses and giving effect to the application of the net proceeds. See “Use of Proceeds” and “Capitalization.”

19


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

      We offer advanced design and manufacturing services to original equipment manufacturers, commonly referred to as OEMs. We specialize in custom display modules utilizing liquid crystal display, or LCD, components and technology. Our LCD modules have varying levels of integration. At a minimum, each module includes an LCD, a custom LCD driver, and a flexible connector. We also provide value-added services, which increase our competitiveness, by assembling additional components onto the module based upon the specific needs of the customer. These additional components include such items as keypads, microphones, speakers, light guides, and optics.

      We currently sell substantially all of our LCD modules to major OEMs. We derived more than 80% of our net sales in 1999 and in the first quarter of 2000 from the mobile handset market. When we win a design program, our customer typically pays all or a portion of our nonrecurring engineering expenses to defray the costs of custom design, as well as the costs of nonrecurring tooling for custom components. The typical program life cycle of a custom-designed LCD module is three to twelve months and includes technical design, prototyping, pilot manufacturing, and high-volume manufacturing. We typically seek large volume programs from major OEMs. The minimum production quantity for an LCD module typically approximates 100,000 units per year, although the production rate for some programs has been as high as 100,000 units per week. The selling price of our LCD modules usually ranges between $5 and $20 per unit. We recognize revenue upon product shipment.

      We experienced substantial growth from 1993 through 1995, primarily as a result of sales to OEMs in the wireless communications industry, which grew substantially during that period. During that period, our primary customer was Motorola. In 1996, our net sales declined, primarily as a result of the phase-out by Motorola of a significant family of programs. In 1997, our net sales returned to pre-1996 levels primarily as a result of several new programs and customers, including Hewlett-Packard. Motorola accounted for 65.1% of our net sales in 1996, 34.6% in 1997, and 63.6% in 1998. In 1999, net sales to Motorola increased at a rate faster than net sales to our other customers and represented 86.1% of our net sales. In the first quarter of 2000, net sales to Motorola represented 84.9% of our net sales. Hewlett-Packard accounted for 32.0% of our net sales in 1997, and less than 10.0% in 1998, 1999, and the first quarter of 2000. This percentage decrease occurred as several older Hewlett-Packard programs matured and ended. In addition, new programs launched by Hewlett-Packard in 1998 and 1999 either did not require our LCD modules or required less complex, lower cost modules.

      During the past several years, we have experienced seasonal quarterly fluctuations in our net sales as our OEM customers developed retail products with shorter product life cycles and phased out older programs early in the year following holiday sales. As a result, sales usually peak in the fourth quarter of a calendar year and are lower in the following quarter.

      Several factors impact our gross margins, including manufacturing efficiencies, product mix, product differentiation, product uniqueness, inventory management, and volume pricing. Currently, significant pricing pressure exists in the LCD module market, especially in higher volume programs in the wireless communications industry. Accordingly, as the production levels of some of our new higher volume programs have increased, the lower standard gross margins on those programs have impacted our overall margins.

      We vertically integrate our manufacturing facilities. In Arizona, we own and operate the largest high-volume LCD production line in North America. We generally use the Arizona facility for the manufacture of more technologically complex and custom high-volume LCDs. We also purchase LCDs from Asian and European sources to provide us an alternate source and to ensure available capacity. In order to take advantage of lower labor costs, we ship our LCDs to our facilities in Manila, the Philippines, or Beijing, China, for assembly into modules.

20


Table of Contents

      Historically, we have conducted most of our manufacturing operations at our facility in Manila. At that facility, we assemble LCDs into modules and perform certain back-end LCD processing operations. We conduct our operations in Manila under an agreement with a third-party subcontract manufacturer. Under this agreement, the subcontractor supplies direct labor and incidental services required to manufacture our products. We also lease our manufacturing facility from the subcontractor. All indirect manufacturing employees, primarily technicians, supervisors, and engineers, are our employees.

      In early 1998, we decided to open a similar display module manufacturing facility in Beijing. Within six months, we located a temporary manufacturing facility, equipped the facility, trained our personnel, qualified the facility for customers, and qualified products manufactured at the facility. We commenced construction of our permanent Beijing facility in late 1998. This facility was substantially completed in early July 1999, and we began production in the new manufacturing facility late in the third quarter of 1999. All production in Bejing beginning in the fourth quarter of 1999 was conducted at our new permanent facility. We own our Beijing facility through a wholly owned foreign subsidiary.

      Selling, general, and administrative expense consists principally of administrative and selling costs, salaries, commissions, and benefits to personnel and related facility costs. We make substantially all of our sales directly to OEMs, and our sales force consists of a small number of direct technical sales persons. As a result, there is no material cost of distribution in our selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general, and administrative expense has increased as we have expanded our business and increased our diversification efforts. In addition, we have recently incurred substantial marketing and administrative expenses in connection with our LCoS microdisplay business.

      Research, development, and engineering expense consists principally of salaries and benefits to scientists, design engineers, and other technical personnel, related facility costs, process development costs, and various expenses for projects, including new product development. Research, development, and engineering expense continues to increase as we develop new display products and technologies, especially LCoS microdisplays, while we continue with our in-house process development efforts related to the high-volume LCD manufacturing line located in Arizona.

      Since 1997, we have been working on the development of LCoS microdisplays. In 1997, we entered into a strategic alliance with National Semiconductor Corporation for the development of LCoS microdisplay products. Under that alliance, National focused on the silicon technologies needed for microdisplays, and we focused on the liquid crystal technologies. In 1999, National decided to close its microdisplay business unit. In connection with that closing, in July 1999, we purchased certain assets and licensed silicon technologies from National relating to LCoS microdisplays. We paid approximately $3.0 million in cash and issued warrants to purchase 140,000 shares of our common stock in the transaction, which valued the transaction at approximately $3.6 million. No additional payments are required under the licenses. We also hired several key technical employees of National to assist in the implementation of the acquired technologies.

      In April 1998, we entered into a strategic relationship with Inviso, Inc., formerly Siliscape, Inc., a privately held company with numerous patents and proprietary technology related to microdisplay development. We acquired a minority equity interest in Inviso for approximately $3.3 million. In March 2000, we acquired an additional interest in Inviso for $500,000, raising our total minority equity interest to $3.8 million. As part of this strategic relationship, we provide proprietary manufacturing capabilities and liquid crystal expertise, and Inviso provides patented and proprietary technologies and components for the joint development of microdisplay products.

      In August 1999, we licensed the microdisplay technology of S-Vision Corporation, which had recently ceased operations. This license is an irrevocable, royalty free, fully paid-up, worldwide license to manufacture and package certain microdisplay products and patented optical engines.

      In October 1999, we entered into an agreement with Tecdis S.p.A., a European-based LCD company, to form an ASIC design center in Chatillon, Italy. The ASIC design center will be known as Dora and will focus on the design of ASICs necessary to drive the LCDs we and Tecdis design for our respective

21


Table of Contents

customers. Recently, STMicroelectronics announced its participation in Dora and its agreement to manufacture the ASICs designed by Dora.

      These acquisitions, investments, and licenses will result in increased research, development, and engineering expense as we expand our LCoS microdisplay development efforts in preparation for the commercial introduction of LCoS microdisplay products. We are also considering licensing other technologies from other companies that could be optimized on our LCD manufacturing line as well as entering into further alliances. We expect to continue to devote substantial resources to research and development, especially on our LCoS microdisplay technology and related products. As a result, the actual dollar amount of our research, development, and engineering expense will continue to increase.

Results of Operations

      The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of net sales of certain items in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

                                           
Three Months
Ended
Years Ended December 31, March 31,


1997 1998 1999 1999 2000





Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %





Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 76.5 80.1 79.8 87.6 75.0
Selling, general, and administrative 7.8 7.7 7.6 10.6 5.7
Research, development, and engineering 6.0 7.6 5.9 7.9 7.1





90.3 95.4 93.3 106.1 87.8





Operating income (loss) 9.7 4.6 6.7 (6.1 ) 12.2
Other income (expense), net 0.4 (0.9 ) 1.5





Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 10.1 4.6 6.7 (7.0 ) 13.7
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 3.9 1.9 2.0 (4.2 ) 4.5





Net income (loss) 6.2 % 2.7 % 4.7 % (2.8 )% 9.2 %





Three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to three months ended March 31, 1999

      Net Sales. Net sales increased 70.0% to $39.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2000 from $23.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 1999. The revenue increase was the result of the increased worldwide demand for mobile handsets.

      Cost of Sales. Cost of sales decreased significantly to 75.0% of net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2000 from 87.6% in the three months ended March 31, 1999. Our cost of sales in the three months ended March 31, 2000 was favorably impacted by operating efficiencies and cost reduction efforts as a result of the continued high levels of production for programs that have been ongoing for several quarters. In addition, the quarter ended March 31, 1999 was adversely impacted by delayed program start-ups, yield issues related to new programs, and start-up expenses for our Beijing facility. In the second quarter, we do not expect cost reduction efforts to offset new, lower pricing for our older programs because production levels are expected to remain relatively constant. In the second half of 2000, a substantial number of new programs for new and existing customers are expected to begin. Many of these new programs are for lower tier mobile handsets and are aggressively priced. Accordingly, we expect our cost of sales as a percentage of net sales to increase during the balance of 2000, although we currently believe that our annual cost of sales as a percentage of net sales in 2000 will remain below that in 1999.

      Selling, General, and Administrative Expense. Selling, general, and administrative expense decreased 4.2% to $2.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2000 from $2.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 1999. The decrease in SG&A expense was the result of a variety of factors, including reduced recruiting fees. Our goal is to keep SG&A expense approximately the same as 1999 levels. SG&A expense

22


Table of Contents

was 5.7% of net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to 10.6% in the three months ended March 31, 1999.

      Research, Development, and Engineering Expense. Research, development, and engineering expense increased 55.6% to $2.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2000 from $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 1999. RD&E expense was 7.1% of net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to 7.9% in the three months ended March 31, 1999. RD&E expense overall increased as the result of the development of new display products and technologies, primarily LCoS microdisplays. LCoS microdisplays accounted for approximately $1.5 million of RD&E expense in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to approximately $866,000 in the three months ended March 31, 1999.

      Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income was $580,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to other expense of $185,000 in the three months ended March 31, 1999. The difference was a result of increased interest income and reduced interest expense. Increased interest income was a result of significantly larger cash balances. The decrease in interest expense was primarily a result of the elimination of all indebtedness.

      Provision for (Benefit From) Income Taxes. We had a provision for income taxes of $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to a benefit from income taxes of $960,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 1999. This change resulted from having income in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to a net loss in the same period in 1999. Generally, the tax rate was lower in the three months ended March 31, 2000 as a result of higher net income in China, which is a low tax rate jurisdiction. We expect our worldwide tax rate in 2000 to be approximately 33%.

      Net Income (Loss). Net income was $3.6 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to a net loss of $642,000, or $0.05 per diluted share, in the three months ended March 31, 1999. Excluding LCoS microdisplay related expenses, our net income for our core passive display business for the three months ended March 31, 2000 was approximately $4.9 million, or $0.24 per diluted share.

Year ended December 31, 1999 compared to year ended December 31, 1998

      Net Sales. Net sales increased 55.2% to $147.4 million in 1999 from $95.0 million in 1998. This increase resulted from several new programs, primarily for Motorola. Net sales in the fourth quarter of 1999 were 117.2% greater than net sales in the first quarter of 1999.

      Cost of Sales. Cost of sales decreased to 79.8% of net sales in 1999 from 80.1% in 1998. This percentage decrease resulted primarily from increased operating efficiencies as a result of a significant increase in production volume. Most of those operating efficiencies occurred in the fourth quarter of 1999. In addition, our permanent China manufacturing facility was operational during the entire fourth quarter, and in that new facility we experienced better yields and absorption than when we operated in our temporary China facility.

      Selling, General, and Administrative Expense. Selling, general, and administrative expense increased 53.4% to $11.2 million in 1999 from $7.3 million in 1998. Selling, general, and administrative expense was 7.6% of net sales in 1999 compared to 7.7% in 1998. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expense reflected the continued expansion of our business. In particular, we incurred approximately $2.2 million of marketing and administrative expenditures relating to our LCoS microdisplay business in 1999 compared to approximately $300,000 in 1998.

      Research, Development, and Engineering Expense. Research, development, and engineering expense increased 20.8% to $8.7 million in 1999 from $7.2 million in 1998. Research, development, and engineering expense was 5.9% of net sales in 1999 compared to 7.6% in 1998. Although research, development, and engineering expense associated with in-process developments on the LCD line decreased in 1999, research, development, and engineering expense overall increased as the result of the development of new display products and technologies. For example, LCoS microdisplays accounted for approximately $4.4 million of research, development, and engineering expense in 1999 compared to approximately $2.4 million in 1998.

23


Table of Contents

      Other Income (Expense), Net. Other expense was $18,000 in 1999 compared to other expense of $42,000 in 1998. We had sharply higher interest income in the fourth quarter of 1999 as a result of increased cash balances and a tax refund. That interest income offset interest expense we had in the first three quarters of 1999 as a result of additional borrowing incurred in connection with our stock repurchase program and increased borrowings on our working capital line of credit. All credit lines were paid off and cash balances increased as a result of our equity offering in the third quarter of 1999.

      Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.0 million in 1999 compared to $1.8 million in 1998. This change resulted primarily from higher pre-tax income in 1999 compared to the same period in 1998. In addition, we recorded tax benefits in the first and fourth quarters of 1999 relating to a state income tax refund. Generally, the tax rate was also lower in 1999 as a result of higher net income in China (which is a low tax rate jurisdiction) compared to a net loss in China in 1998.

      Net Income. Net income increased 165% to $6.9 million, or $0.43 per diluted share, in 1999 from $2.6 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, in 1998. Excluding LCoS microdisplay related expenses, our net income for 1999 was approximately $11.4 million, or $0.71 per diluted share.

Year ended December 31, 1998 compared to year ended December 31, 1997

      Net Sales. Net sales increased 12.3% to $95.0 million in 1998 from $84.6 million in 1997. The increase resulted from several new programs in 1998 for a variety of customers, including Motorola. In 1998, we recorded 56.7% of our net sales in the third and fourth quarters. Net sales in the fourth quarter of 1998 were almost 58.6% greater than in the first quarter of 1998.

      Cost of Sales. Cost of sales increased to 80.1% of net sales in 1998 from 76.5% in 1997. The corresponding decrease in our gross margin was primarily the result of manufacturing variances occurring as a result of the start-up of our new manufacturing facility in Beijing, unfavorable manufacturing yields experienced in connection with the start of several new programs, and increased pricing pressure from customers and competitors, partially as a result of the Asian economic crisis.

      Selling, General, and Administrative Expense. Selling, general, and administrative expense increased 10.6% to $7.3 million in 1998 from $6.6 million in 1997. Selling, general, and administrative expense was 7.7% of net sales in 1998 compared to 7.8% in 1997. Selling, general, and administrative expense increased in absolute terms as a result of increased selling expenses and the addition of administrative personnel. As a result of increased net sales in 1998, however, selling, general, and administrative expense declined slightly as a percent of net sales.

      Research, Development, and Engineering Expense. Research, development, and engineering expense increased 41.2% to $7.2 million in 1998 from $5.1 million in 1997. Research, development, and engineering expense was 7.6% of net sales in 1998 compared to 6.0% in 1997. In 1998, we continued to expand and intensify our research and development efforts on proprietary display products as well as ongoing LCD manufacturing process improvements, including increased use of the LCD manufacturing line in our Arizona facility as a resource for development of these new products.

      Other Income (Expense), Net. Other expense was $42,000 in 1998 compared to other income of $358,000 in 1997. Net interest income in 1998 was $75,000, down from $548,000 in 1997. The decrease in net interest income was the result of investing lower average cash balances during the year as well as increased interest expense as a result of increased debt. This decline in net interest income was partially offset by reduced foreign exchange losses.

      Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.8 million in 1998 compared to $3.3 million in 1997. Our overall tax rate was 40.6% in 1998 compared to 38.9% in 1997. The increased tax rate resulted primarily from losses in Beijing for which we did not receive a tax benefit proportionate to our tax rate elsewhere in the world.

      Net Income. Net income decreased 50.0% to $2.6 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, in 1998 compared to $5.2 million, or $0.32 per diluted share, in 1997.

24


Table of Contents

Quarterly Results of Operations

      The following table presents unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the nine quarters in the period ended March 31, 2000, as well as such data expressed as a percentage of net sales. We believe that all necessary adjustments have been included to present fairly the quarterly information when read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent quarter.

                                                                           
Quarters Ended

(in thousands)
1998 1999 2000



Mar. 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31 Mar. 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31 Mar. 31









Net sales $ 18,479 $ 22,682 $ 24,572 $ 29,314 $ 23,044 $ 31,600 $ 42,723 $ 50,041 $ 39,162









Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales 13,687 17,095 22,243 23,124 20,191 25,103 33,882 38,407 29,360
Selling, general, and Administrative 1,619 1,815 1,721 2,179 2,449 2,493 2,741 3,487 2,262
Research, development, and engineering 1,689 1,904 1,250 2,316 1,821 2,008 2,427 2,489 2,763









16,995 20,814 25,214 27,619 24,461 29,604 39,050 44,383 34,385









Operating income (loss) 1,484 1,868 (642 ) 1,695 (1,417 ) 1,996 3,673 5,658 4,777
Other income (expense), net 175 124 (52 ) (289 ) (185 ) (214 ) (160 ) 541 580









Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 1,659 1,992 (694 ) 1,406 (1,602 ) 1,782 3,513 6,199 5,357
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 664 869 (291 ) 531 (960 ) 742 1,476 1,710 1,770









Net income (loss) $ 995 $ 1,123 $ (403 ) $ 875 $ (642 ) $ 1,040 $ 2,037 $ 4,489 $ 3,587









                                                                           
Percentage of Net Sales
Quarters Ended

1998 1999 2000



Mar. 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31 Mar. 31 June 30 Sept. 30 Dec. 31 Mar. 31









Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %









Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales 74.1 75.4 90.5 78.9 87.6 79.4 79.3 76.8 75.0
Selling, general, and Administrative 8.8 8.0 7.0 7.4 10.6 7.9 6.4 6.9 5.7
Research, development, and engineering 9.1 8.4 5.1 7.9 7.9 6.4 5.7 5.0 7.1









92.0 91.8 102.6 94.2 106.1 93.7 91.4 88.7 87.8









Operating income (loss) 8.0 8.2 (2.6 ) 5.8 (6.1 ) 6.3 8.6 11.3 12.2
Other income (expense), net 1.0 0.6 (0.2 ) (1.0 ) (0.9 ) (0.7 ) (0.4 ) 1.1 1.5









Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 9.0 8.8 (2.8 ) 4.8 (7.0 ) 5.6 8.2 12.4 13.7
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 3.6 3.8 (1.2 ) 1.8 (4.2 ) 2.3 3.4 3.4 4.5









Net income (loss) 5.4 % 5.0 % (1.6 )% 3.0 % (2.8 )% 3.3 % 4.8 % 9.0 % 9.2 %









      Historically, we have experienced seasonal fluctuations in our net sales. OEM customers that purchase our products for incorporation into retail products, such as mobile handsets, typically increase their purchases during the year-end holiday period and phase out old programs early in the year following holiday sales. As a result, net sales typically peak in the fourth quarter and reach a seasonal low point in the first quarter.

      There is significant pricing pressure in higher volume programs in the wireless communications and office automation industries. In addition, high-volume programs that generally have lower gross margins began to represent a larger percentage of net sales in the second half of 1998, thereby reducing gross margins. In the third quarter of 1998, we also started several new programs and incurred substantial start-up costs on those new programs. In addition, excess inventory purchases occurred in the second quarter of 1998, slowing purchases in the third quarter of 1998 and greatly reducing material overhead absorption in that quarter. In the first quarter of 1999, we had an unfavorable product mix, shipping principally lower margin products. In addition, reduced manufacturing yields and under-absorption of fixed overhead contributed to lower margins. In the second half of 1999, higher volumes in our manufacturing facilities produced increased operating efficiencies, resulting in better margins.

25


Table of Contents

      We started new manufacturing operations in Beijing in 1998 in a temporary manufacturing facility. Our gross margins in the second and third quarters of 1998 were adversely affected by start-up costs associated with these operations, which were incurred in advance of the receipt of significant sales. We moved into our permanent facility in the third quarter of 1999 and, as a result, operating efficiencies increased in China in the fourth quarter of 1999.

      In 1999, we continued to expand and intensify our research and development efforts on proprietary display products, such as LCoS microdisplays. Other expense increased in the last half of 1998 and the first half of 1999 as our cash balances declined and we increased our borrowings. All borrowings were paid off and cash balances increased as a result of our equity offering in the third quarter of 1999. As a result, we had sharply higher interest income in the fourth quarter of 1999.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      At March 31, 2000, we had cash and cash equivalents of $45.4 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $45.4 million at December 31, 1999.

      In the quarter ended March 31, 2000, we had $2.8 million in net cash flow from operations compared to $2.1 million in net cash flow from operations in the quarter ended March 31, 1999. Although we had net income in the first quarter of 2000 and a net loss in the first quarter of 1999, our cash flows in the two quarters were comparable because accounts payable and accrued liabilities were reduced by $4.5 million in the first quarter of 2000 compared to an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $1.5 million in the first quarter of 1999.

      Depreciation expense increased to $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2000 compared to $1.3 million for the first quarter of 1999. This increase primarily relates to increased starts on our LCD line and increased building depreciation as a result of our China operations. The high-volume LCD line is depreciated on a units of production method based on units started. Inventory turns increased from 6.3 in the first quarter of 1999 to 9.3 in the first quarter of 2000. Accounts receivable DSOs (Day Sales Outstanding) decreased to 43 days in the first quarter of 2000 from 69 days in the first quarter of 1999.

      In 1999, we had $18.4 million in net cash flow from operations compared to nearly flat net cash flow from operations during 1998. Cash flow from operations improved during 1999 primarily as a result of increased net income and depreciation expense. Our depreciation expense was $5.9 million for 1999 as compared with $4.7 million for 1998. This increase relates to increased starts on our LCD line and increased capital equipment as a result of our China operations. The high-volume LCD line is depreciated on a units of production method based on units started. The increased operational cash flow in 1999 was also the result of inventory turns increasing from 7.3 to 9.5 in 1999 and account receivable DSOs (Day Sales Outstanding) decreasing throughout the year, ending at 52 days on December 31, 1999.

      Our working capital was $63.3 million at March 31, 2000 and $60.9 million at December 31, 1999. Our current ratio increased to 4.2-to-1 at March 31, 2000 from 3.8-to-1 at December 31, 1999. The increase in our working capital and current ratio during the first quarter of 2000 occurred primarily because of the significant reduction in accounts payable while inventories remained relatively unchanged. Including our cash, cash equivalents, and available credit facilities, we had approximately $70.8 million in readily available funds at March 31, 2000 compared to $70.7 million at December 31, 1999.

      In January 2000, we entered into a new credit facility with Imperial Bank to replace the then existing credit facility. The new credit facility is a $25.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit that matures in January 2001. Mellon Bank is a participating lender on that new credit facility. No borrowings are outstanding under the new credit facility. Advances under the new facility may be made as prime rate advances, which accrue interest payable monthly at the bank’s prime lending rate, or as LIBOR rate advances, which bear interest at 150 basis points in excess of the LIBOR base rate. Our Three-Five Systems Limited subsidiary has established an annually renewable credit facility with a United Kingdom bank in order to fund its working capital requirements. The credit facility, which expires July 15, 2000, provides $350,000 of borrowing capacity secured by accounts receivable of Three-Five Systems Limited. No borrowings are outstanding under this facility.

26


Table of Contents

      Capital expenditures during the quarter ended March 31, 2000 were approximately $3.2 million. These capital expenditures primarily consisted of equipment for our operations in Manila, Beijing, and Arizona, including manufacturing equipment for LCoS microdisplays. We also made an additional investment in Inviso, Inc. of $500,000, bringing our total minority investments in Inviso to $3.8 million. Our total capital budget for 2000 remains at approximately $14.0 million, although actual expenditures may be greater if additional capacity is needed in the fourth quarter of 2000.

      Capital expenditures during 1999 were approximately $12.5 million. These capital expenditures consisted of $5.6 million for equipment and construction costs relating to our manufacturing facility in Beijing; $1.8 million for manufacturing and office equipment for our operations in Manila and Arizona; and $5.1 million for LCoS microdisplays, including our purchase of assets and licenses from National Semiconductor and S-Vision. The assets and licensed silicon technologies from National Semiconductor relating to LCoS microdisplays were acquired for approximately $3.0 million in cash and warrants to purchase 140,000 shares of our common stock. Substantially all of the purchase price was allocated to depreciable assets, tooling and mask rights, and amortizable licenses.

      Capital expenditures during 1998 were approximately $8.1 million. These capital expenditures consisted primarily of manufacturing and office equipment for our operations in Manila and Arizona and laboratory equipment for research and development. In addition, we spent $5.3 million for equipment and construction in 1998 related to our Beijing operations. In 1998 and 1999, we cumulatively expended approximately $10.9 million in Beijing for manufacturing, equipment, building construction, and land costs.

      We believe that our existing balances of cash and cash equivalents, the proceeds of this offering, anticipated cash flows from operations, and available credit lines will provide adequate sources to fund our operations and planned expenditures through 2000. We may have to expand our loan commitments or pursue alternate methods of financing or raise capital, however, should we encounter additional cash requirements, such as the need for increased manufacturing capacity. In addition, we will continue to seek other alliances or acquisitions and additional relationships with regard to the strategic development of various new technologies, especially LCoS microdisplays, that may also require us to make additional capital investments. We cannot provide assurance that adequate additional loan commitments or alternative methods of financing will be available or, if available, that they will be on terms acceptable to us.

Effects of Inflation and Foreign Currency Exchange Fluctuations

      The results of our operations for the periods discussed have not been significantly affected by inflation or foreign currency fluctuations. We generally sell our products and services and negotiate purchase orders with our foreign suppliers in U.S. dollars. However, we have certain foreign currency exchange exposure as a result of our manufacturing operations in the Philippines and China. The sub-assembly agreement relating to our operations in Manila is based on a fixed conversion rate, exposing us to exchange rate fluctuations with the Philippine peso. We have not incurred any material exchange gains or losses to date. There has been some minor benefit as a result of the peso devaluation, although we are now required to pay approximately one-third of any peso devaluation gain to our lessor and direct labor subcontractor in Manila.

      In China, we have accounts receivable and cash deposits in the local currency. Although the Chinese currency currently is stable, its value in relation to the U.S. dollar is determined by the Chinese government. There has been general speculation since late 1998 that China may devalue its currency. Devaluation of the Chinese currency could result in translation adjustments to our balance sheet as well as reportable losses depending on our monetary balances and outstanding indebtedness at the time of devaluation. The government of China historically has made it difficult to convert its local currency into foreign currencies. Although from time to time we may enter into hedging transactions in order to minimize our exposure to currency rate fluctuations, the Chinese currency is not freely traded and thus is difficult to hedge. In addition, the government of China has recently imposed restrictions on Chinese currency loans to foreign-operated entities in China. Based on the foregoing, we cannot provide assurance that fluctuations and currency exchange rates in the future will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

27


Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Introduction

      We design and manufacture display modules for use in the end products of original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. We currently specialize in custom liquid crystal display, or LCD, components and technology. We collaborate closely with our customers in providing our design and manufacturing services. Our LCD modules are used in mobile handsets and other wireless communication devices as well as in the data collection, medical electronics, and other commercial and consumer marketplaces. In addition to our traditional LCD module business, we are pursuing the commercialization of our liquid crystal on silicon, or LCoS, microdisplays following substantial research and development over the past three years. We market our services in North America, Europe, and Asia primarily through a direct technical sales force. Motorola is our largest customer.

Industry Overview

Liquid Crystal Displays

      Prior to the introduction of LCDs in the 1970s, most commonly used displays and indicators had substantial limitations as to their use, especially in terms of size, life, and power consumption. LCDs were developed in response to these limitations, especially the demand for greater information content and less power consumption than was possible using light emitting diode, or LED, technology. LCDs, sometimes called flat panel displays, provide high-information content displays at competitive prices. LCDs now appear in products throughout the communications, office automation, industrial, medical, and commercial electronics industries. LCDs are one of the fastest growing of the established display industry segments, primarily because of their widespread application in mobile communications devices, a fast-growing segment of the electronics industry.

      An LCD modifies light that passes through or is reflected by it, rather than emitting light like an LED. An LCD generally consists of a layer of liquid crystalline material suspended between two glass plates. The liquid crystals align themselves in a predictable manner when stimulated electrically. The alignment produces a visual representation of the desired information. LCDs can display information in black and white or in a wide range of color combinations. LCD displays consist of a matrix of dots, called pixels, which are arranged in rows and columns that can be selectively energized to form letters or pictures. A principal advantage of LCDs over other display technologies, such as LEDs, is the ability to include thousands or even millions of pixels in a single display, which allows for greater information content.

      There are two types of LCDs, active matrix and passive matrix. Active matrix LCD displays are relatively complex devices that require manufacturing operations involving very large capital investments. Active matrix LCD displays are used in larger, high-information content applications, such as laptop computers. Passive matrix LCD displays are less complex and less expensive to manufacture. Passive matrix LCD displays are used in such applications as mobile handsets, pagers, office equipment, data collection terminals, point of sale equipment, medical devices, transportation instrumentation, and industrial instruments and controls.

The Custom Passive LCD Market

      Stanford Resources, Inc. estimated that the worldwide market for passive LCD display modules was approximately $2.8 billion in 1998. This market includes displays used in mobile handsets and other wireless communication devices as well as in office automation equipment, industrial controls, medical equipment, and instrumentation, but excludes displays for use in low-end consumer products, such as watches and calculators, according to Stanford Resources. Of the $2.8 billion market, $1.4 billion represented LCD displays used in mobile handset applications. Mobile handsets are the largest and fastest growing market for LCD modules. According to Stanford Resources, the worldwide market for mobile wireless handsets has grown from an estimated 165 million units produced in 1998 to 281 million units in 1999. Stanford Resources estimates that

28


Table of Contents

mobile handset production will be 390 million units in 2000. Additional fast growing markets for LCD display modules include pagers, personal digital assistants, or PDAs, and palm top computers.

      The increasing complexity and functionality of handheld products, such as wireless computing devices, require OEMs to increase the visual performance and information content of the displays incorporated into their products. At the same time, the market continues to demand that OEMs incorporate displays with reduced power requirements and lower costs. Custom passive LCDs address these requirements for high performance, increased information content, low power, and low cost.

      OEMs also seek ways to differentiate their products from the products of their competitors. Custom-designed display modules provide OEMs a cost-effective means to achieve this differentiation. In designing its product, an OEM must determine whether to use standard “off-the-shelf” display modules, to design its own custom display modules for production by a custom display manufacturer, or to enter into arrangements with a third party for custom display design and production. In making a decision to engage third parties for custom design and production, OEMs recognize that standard “off-the-shelf” displays make it more difficult to differentiate their products from those of their competitors. In considering whether to design their own display modules, OEMs often recognize that their greatest strengths consist of consumer brand name recognition, market research and product development expertise, and highly developed sales and distribution channels. Advanced design and manufacturing processes require increasing investments for research and development, personnel, and equipment. Competitive market conditions require a shorter period of time from product conception to delivery, product differentiation, improved product user friendliness, and continually enhanced product performance and reduced product cost during the life cycle of the product. As a result of these factors and increasingly sophisticated and complex technology, it has become more difficult for even the leading OEMs to maintain the necessary technology, expertise, personnel, and equipment to design and produce internally all of the various components necessary for their products. As a result, there has been a trend toward outsourcing the design and production of components such as display modules.

      In addition to design and production, OEMs have increased their use of third-party suppliers to add additional components to their products. This permits the integration of more of the manufacturing steps into fewer locations. This trend toward integration and outsourcing decreases the number of suppliers necessary to produce a final product and results in lower costs.

The Emerging Microdisplay Market

      Market trends demand high-information, power-efficient displays with increasing functionality and smaller sizes at relatively low costs. Microdisplays based on liquid crystal on silicon technology provide a response to those demands.

      Liquid crystal on silicon microdisplays are a form of LCD in which liquid crystalline material is suspended between a glass plate and a silicon backplane rather than between two glass plates. The silicon backplane, essentially an integrated circuit, provides drive signals for each pixel element of the display as well as logic functions, such as serial to parallel conversion and data storage. Because silicon integrated circuits, a highly developed technology, form the basis of these displays, liquid crystal on silicon technology permits a very high-information, high-performance display in a small size and at a relatively low cost.

      Microdisplays are no larger than a thumbnail, but contain all of the information appearing on a high-resolution personal computer screen. The tiny image on a microdisplay can be projected onto a screen or other surface for individual or group viewing or used in a portable application that is viewed through a magnifying device similar to a viewfinder. Various types of projector applications represent the most common current use of microdisplays. Projectors can cast the information on a distant large screen, as in audio-visual front projectors, or shine the image through a translucent screen, as in rear projectors. Potential initial microdisplay applications include use in business projection equipment and computer monitors. Other potential applications include digital and high-definition televisions and a wide variety of portable devices, such as wireless Internet access devices, mobile handsets, pagers, and PDAs as well as in wearable computing equipment using head-mounted displays, which allow hands-free access to large amounts of information.

29


Table of Contents

      A well-developed front projector market currently exists. These products are typically referred to as audio-visual projectors and are generally fixed or portable products used in business applications. Most front projectors currently use transmissive polysilicon and reflective DMD microdisplay technologies. Reflective liquid crystal on silicon technology, however, is expected to provide more information at a lower cost.

      Emerging market segments are beginning to develop for large, cost-effective, higher-resolution computer monitors and television screens. Current display technologies for computer monitors and digital and high-definition televisions encounter serious barriers related to cost, resolution, and dimensions when used for high-resolution large screens. Many companies are considering the incorporation of microdisplays into large, high-resolution screens to enable affordable display solutions.

      Significant development efforts are currently being directed to portable microdisplays as a potential method for delivering high-information content at low cost and with low power consumption in mobile, hand-held communications devices. It is widely assumed that converged voice and data communications devices have the potential to become a new class of products in mobile communications, probably integrated with PDA functions, such as phonebooks and calendars. In concept, the functions of the telephone, e-mail, pagers, PDAs, and the Internet are expected to become integrated. Delivery of high-information content over the Internet on a small, direct-view display, however, presents difficult technological challenges. Portable microdisplays used with a viewfinder offer a potential solution because they can deliver as much information as a computer monitor in a very small, lightweight, and power-efficient package.

      The portable microdisplay market is just beginning to develop. Market potential currently is uncertain and is limited by such factors as the availability of sufficient wireless communications bandwidth, the uncertainty of customer acceptance, and the possibility of alternative technologies. Nevertheless, many major vendors of mobile handsets, pagers, and PDAs have prototype programs underway to develop new converged mobile communications products with large information content at low cost, and many of these vendors are beginning to assess portable microdisplays for use in these products.

The Three-Five Approach

      We seek to provide our customers with high-performance, information-rich, low-power consumption displays that have competitive advantages in terms of size, cost, and product differentiation. To accomplish this goal, our research and development activities focus on technological developments intended to meet the current and future requirements of our customers. We add value for our customers through our ability to integrate the design and production process, which reduces the time between product conception and market introduction. Our emphasis on customization and technological leadership has positioned us to develop new custom product solutions for our customers as they seek displays with more information content at lower cost.

      Our custom product solutions provide OEMs with the following benefits:

  •  access to specialized design and manufacturing technology and expertise;
 
  •  accelerated design process and reduced design and manufacturing costs through the use of our specialized personnel, equipment, and facilities;
 
  •  reduced reliance on multiple suppliers for components and integration of their production processes; and
 
  •  the ability to concentrate their own resources on the design, production, and distribution of their core products.

      By eliminating the duplication and overlap of investment and resources, we and our OEM customers are able to work together and grow at a faster rate than would otherwise be possible. We concentrate on the development of our display technologies and their applications to products, while our customers devote time and resources on market development for these products.

      Our historical target market consists of high-end monochrome passive matrix LCD display modules of  1/4 VGA (320 x 240 pixels) or less resolution, primarily those having smaller than three-inch diagonal screen

30


Table of Contents

sizes. We do not address low-end LCD display markets, such as watches and calculators. Our target market for LCoS microdisplays consists of displays of SVGA (800 x 600 pixels) or higher resolution.

Strategy

      Our strategy is to enhance our position as a leading worldwide supplier of custom-designed and manufactured displays for application in various high-growth segments of the electronics industry. Key elements of our strategy include the following:

Target Leading Customers in High-Growth Industries

      We identify industries that we believe have the greatest long-term potential for growth. We recognize that our growth and development is closely aligned with the growth and development of the industries we serve. Current targeted industries include mobile handsets and other wireless communications, data collection, office automation, medical equipment, and industrial controls.

      Within an industry, we target leading companies that we believe would benefit from our design and manufacturing services. Targeted customers typically are Fortune 1000 manufacturing companies whose products require display devices. Our sales and engineering staffs then attempt to demonstrate the benefits that the potential customer would derive by outsourcing to us the design and production of display devices required in their products.

      Once we establish a relationship with a new customer, we endeavor to develop new programs for other product groups within the customer’s business. For this reason, we specifically target customers with multiple divisions or product lines.

Expand Customer Base

      We intend to intensify our efforts to expand our customer base. We also plan to target specialized markets that have substantial volume requirements. We will continue to seek opportunities in growing and emerging markets, both in the United States and internationally.

Establish Close Relationships with Customers

      We seek to establish strong and long-lasting customer relationships through our fundamental business practice, which we refer to as “customer partnering.” Customer partnering involves aligning our prospects with those of our customers and seeking to make our engineering and production staffs seamless extensions of the product design and production departments of our customers. This includes our engineers spending a significant portion of their time assisting customers with their own research and development efforts at their facilities. In addition, our customers’ engineers spend a significant amount of time conducting research and development in our facilities.

      We stress product solutions for our customers’ products. We view each customer’s new product as our own and take pride in creating and implementing innovative engineering solutions that differentiate the customer’s product from competitive products. In connection with this philosophy, we have positioned ourselves to provide a rapid response to our customers and their worldwide operations.

      To achieve our customer partnering goal, we emphasize corporate cultures, customs, and communications that complement those of our customers. A thorough understanding of our customers’ products and business goals enables us to anticipate customer needs and to develop new design and production solutions for their products.

      We continually attempt to enhance the competitive position of our customers by providing them with innovative, distinctive, and high-quality display devices on a timely and cost-effective basis. To do so, we work continually to improve our productivity, lower our costs, and speed the delivery of our product solutions. We endeavor to streamline the entire design through delivery process by maintaining an ongoing engineering and manufacturing improvement effort.

31


Table of Contents

      We continue to provide customer support after product design has been completed and production has been commenced. Through such follow-on activity, we conduct quality enhancement and cost-reduction efforts to maintain the competitiveness of our customers’ products.

Provide Advanced Custom Design and Manufacturing Services

      We seek to design, prototype, and manufacture, on a timely and cost-effective basis, a wide range of innovative, distinctive, and high-quality display devices for operational control and information display functions required in the end products of OEMs. Our design processes utilize advanced computer-aided design software to provide custom solutions for customers’ products in time frames and on cost bases that we believe are substantially shorter and lower-priced than industry norms.

      We operate our highly automated, high-volume LCD manufacturing line in Arizona to produce the majority of our LCDs. We utilize advanced, flexible manufacturing systems for high-volume module assembly in Manila and Beijing. We believe our three manufacturing facilities provide us with a competitive advantage in meeting the custom LCD needs of our customers. We anticipate that our ability to design, prototype, and manufacture product solutions will be enhanced by the expansion of our engineering personnel, our increased design capacity, and our ability to meet our LCD requirements. We continue to increase our production personnel and add sophisticated manufacturing equipment to meet expanding capacity requirements. We will continue to explore the most advanced and cost-efficient production methods for each product solution.

Exceed Customer Requirements Through Speed and Efficiency

      We emphasize innovative design and manufacturing techniques to improve the speed, efficiency, and performance of our design and manufacturing services. This enables our customers to address the pressure to reduce the lead times for market introduction of their products. As part of our development process, we continually improve and modify our design and manufacturing processes, controls, and methodology in an effort to support our customers’ requirements.

Leverage Research, Development, and Engineering

      We continually strive to develop and acquire new technologies and utilize technological developments in order to provide practical solutions for our customers. We conduct an active research and development program designed to

  •  continually improve our products and create new products,
 
  •  increase our efficiency,
 
  •  reduce our costs,
 
  •  improve the speed, efficiency, and performance of our design and manufacturing services,
 
  •  develop new design and manufacturing processes and techniques, and
 
  •  enhance the quality, cost-effectiveness, and value of our services.

      We plan to expand our research and development efforts through increased expenditures and the hiring of additional personnel to meet the expectations of our customers and to satisfy our goal to design and produce the most advanced product solutions on a timely and cost-effective basis. New technologies include our LCoS microdisplays, which address the increased demands for high-information displays in a small size and at a relatively low cost. In addition, we currently are exploring the development and expansion of existing LCD technologies as well as new technologies, such as sunlight readable LCDs, color LCDs, plastic LCDs, bi-stable LCDs, graphics and color graphics, organic and polymer light emitting displays, and pixel-related display technologies.

32


Table of Contents

Products and Services

      We currently engage in the design and manufacture of LCD display modules and the development and commercialization of manufacturing technologies for use in various products of OEMs.

LCD Display Modules and Services

      We currently emphasize custom designed LCD display modules. A manufacturer of a complete system or product requiring a specific type of visual display, such as a mobile handset, medical instrument, business machine, or hand-held data collection device, represents a typical buyer for a custom LCD display module. For each custom display module, we work directly with our customer to develop and produce the original design and to manufacture the display module in accordance with the customer’s specifications. At a minimum, each module includes an LCD, a custom LCD driver, and a flexible connector. We also provide value-added services by assembling additional components onto the module, such as keypads, microphones, speakers, light guides, and optics. In 1999, LCD custom display modules accounted for approximately 95.0% of our net sales.

      We have developed a sophisticated design process to meet the specific needs of our customers’ applications. Each design project normally involves a cross-functional team of our engineers who are assigned to a customer program. The team consults with the customer’s engineers throughout the design, prototype development, and manufacturing process. We continue to supply value-added engineering support after the design solution has been developed and integrated into the manufacturing process in an ongoing effort to provide customers with product performance enhancements and cost-reduction opportunities.

      The difficulties in developing a custom LCD module include unclear customer expectations, evolving customer requirements, and changing customer end-product specifications. These factors result in lengthy lead times for market introduction of customers’ products. To overcome the traditional obstacles involved in custom design and development, we have developed the four phase program development process described below. We combine our program development process with our philosophy of being a “seamless extension of our customer.” This results in a very flexible, responsive, accurate, and fast development cycle that enables our customers to introduce their products into the market rapidly. Our program development process consists of the following phases:

  •  Feasibility and concept phase. We work closely with our customer to understand its requirements. Customer input varies from rough sketches to detailed specifications. Experienced LCD module design engineers work to develop conceptual solutions to customer requirements that include both design and cost parameters.
 
  •  Prototype phase. We conduct a design review with the customer; complete at our Arizona facility a proposed design, including the electrical, mechanical, and optical features of the LCD display module; and deliver a prototype to the customer.
 
  •  Pilot phase. We perform a thorough design review with our customer, involving an analysis of performance, cost, and volume production considerations. A successful pilot phase results in the completion of any design changes, the ordering of the tooling required for production, and the delivery of manufacturing samples. We generally conduct the pilot phase primarily in Manila.
 
  •  High-volume production phase. We complete any required changes in the manufacturing process, receive necessary tooling, and commence high-volume production. The production takes place either in Manila or Beijing.

      We also design and produce standard or “off-the-shelf” devices, which involve designs that are adaptable to various uses with little or no modification. Standard devices encompass a wide variety of display devices having varied applications. Standard display devices include solid state lamps, multi-digit numerical displays, integrated displays, and bar graph displays. In 1999, our standard devices accounted for less than 3% of our net sales and consisted of non-LCD devices.

33


Table of Contents

New Display Technologies

      We are pursuing several new technology initiatives for our display module business. First, we have patented a new type of sunlight readable LCD display that we call Liquid Crystal intense Display, or LCiD. This lower information content device provides a multi-colored, emissive-looking display at passive LCD prices.

      LCiD display devices include a display from as little as one line by five character dot matrix to as large as four line by 20 character dot matrix, all available in a variety of colors. We began production shipments of LCiD in the fourth quarter of 1999. We expect that LCiD displays will be used primarily in lower information content applications requiring high contrast, desired color, and ease of readability from full sunlight to complete darkness. We have recently received orders for LCiD displays for applications in several markets. These applications include radar detectors and various types of digital audio devices, including MP3 players. Other potential applications for our LCiD display devices include automotive instrumentation, appliances, hand-held instrumentation devices, vending equipment, stereo equipment, embedded computing equipment, remote sensing equipment, outdoor monitor equipment, and industrial controls.

      We also have begun research and development efforts on several types of new display technologies, including reflective color LCDs, color-filter LCDs, plastic LCDs, monochrome LCDs with a paper-white background, bi-stable LCDs, and organic and polymer light emitting displays. Some of these initiatives have and will be undertaken with partners and in strategic alliances. For example, we recently established a strategic relationship with Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corporation to develop reflective color LCD displays. We expect that manufacturers of mobile handsets, Internet appliances, and smart phones will soon begin to use color LCD displays. Reflective color displays utilize ambient light to illuminate the display. As a result, reflective color displays use less power than other types of color displays, which is important for portable products where battery life is a critical factor.

LCoS Microdisplays

      The display market demands continually greater information content at reduced prices. In response to these demands, we are pursuing the commercialization of our liquid crystal on silicon, or LCoS, microdisplays following three years of extensive research and development activities. Our LCoS technology provides very high-information content in a small size and at an expected relatively low cost. The information presented by these displays is magnified for view, generally either in a projector or in a viewfinder. We believe that the inherent capability of our LCoS technology provides a cost-effective solution to increased information demands.

      Our current plan for the development of our LCoS microdisplay business is to respond in an efficient manner to industry developments and changes, to develop a dedicated organization infrastructure, and to develop or lead the market to a common LCoS module platform. To meet our business objective of becoming the leading supplier of microdisplay visual systems, we must rapidly commercialize LCoS microdisplay technology on a cost-effective basis. This requires us to focus on common LCoS module platforms that provide economies of scale, rapid time to market, and broad market penetration. Specifically, our strategy calls for a business preparation phase and a business growth phase. We are currently transitioning from the business preparation phase to the business growth phase. In the preparation phase, we emphasized research, development, and licensing opportunities to expand our technology portfolio, design engineering of LCoS products for a significant number of OEMs, and management to establish an organization infrastructure. The business growth phase calls for resources to be deployed primarily in high-volume manufacturing, marketing, sales, and business development.

      We are developing a broad range of LCoS microdisplay products to offer customers. The table below sets forth various resolutions with pixel count, or the number of color dots on a screen, and potential uses for our

34


Table of Contents

LCoS microdisplays. We currently have multiple LCoS solutions, which we have prototyped for customer evaluation. We are focussing on products with the capability to produce all of the following resolutions:
                 
Resolution Pixel Count Applications



SVGA 480,000 Hand-held devices such as PDAs or mobile handsets and head mounted displays or wearable computers
XGA 780,000 Portable audio-visual projectors
SXGA 1,300,000 Portable audio-visual projectors, rear-projection monitors, digital television
HDTV 2,000,000 High-definition digital television

      We believe that the initial markets for our LCoS microdisplay products will be in front projectors, monitors, and digital and high-definition television sets. Currently, the front projector, rear projection, and digital and high-definition television markets are being served by active matrix polysilicon microdisplays and DMD microdisplays. Polysilicon microdisplays are manufactured by several large Japanese companies. These products are incapable of producing cost-effective resolutions above XGA without the further expense of adding special optics and are generally more expensive than anticipated costs for LCoS microdisplays. DMD microdisplays are a proprietary product of Texas Instruments. Although DMDs have no inherent resolution limitations, they are relatively expensive to manufacture, especially at higher resolutions. The expected relatively low cost for LCoS microdisplays makes them more suitable for competitive consumer marketplaces, such as portable business projectors, monitors, and digital and high-definition televisions.

      We believe another market for LCoS microdisplay products will be converged wireless products requiring high-information content displays for e-mail and access to the Internet. Use of an LCoS microdisplay in a viewfinder application would enable a person to carry a portable device capable of delivering the same SVGA resolution as on the person’s desktop or laptop computer. This has the potential to allow portable access to the Internet and critical information, such as calendars, maps, e-mail, and documentation, in a handheld product. The high resolution of the device would avoid scrolling or time-consuming text conversions in accessing the World Wide Web for needed information.

      We plan to offer a range of LCoS product solutions with different levels of integration from individual light valves to fully integrated displays. By adopting a modular approach to configuring and selling our LCoS microdisplays, we will have the opportunity to price our products on a value-added basis and to rapidly introduce new LCoS products. In addition, we have been working with optical companies that are interested in developing optical light engines for sale to OEMs that manufacture monitors and televisions. A light engine consists of a lens, color management system, lamp, and microdisplay. LCoS microdisplays require different optics than those employed when using transmissive polysilicon microdisplays.

      We have recently entered into an agreement with Nikon Corporation and Mitsui & Co. Ltd. for the development of a high-performance light engine employing Nikon’s proprietary polarizing beam splitter optical technology and our LCoS microdisplays. The light engines will be targeted to the rear-projection computer monitor and television markets as a replacement for conventional CRT computer monitors and televisions. In addition, Advanced Optical Engineering and Samsung Electro-Mechanics Company recently announced the development of a new optical light engine, which utilizes our LCoS microdisplay, targeted to the projection market and designed to be a platform for the development of other light engine products to be used in rear-projection computer monitors, PCTVs, television sets, and Internet ready appliances.

      We will have undertaken extensive development efforts before the first sale of LCoS products, and we expect to incur substantial losses in the microdisplay business until the volume production of LCoS microdisplays. We currently expect initial production to commence in late 2000.

Sales and Marketing

      We approach sales and marketing on three levels: engineer to engineer, salesperson to procurement, and factory to factory. Our approach is to treat an existing program as a marketing platform for the next program.

35


Table of Contents

Our engineering, marketing, and sales groups provide ongoing services to our customers throughout the life of product programs. These services include implementing continuous improvement tools related to both the product’s cost and technical performance. This service function allows us to market future sales within our customer base.

      We market our services primarily in North America, Asia, and Europe through a direct technical sales force resident in those areas. A staff of in-house, Arizona-based engineering personnel directs and aids all sales personnel. We have 15 sales persons worldwide.

      Our sales to customers in Europe represented approximately 35.2% of net sales in 1998, approximately 46.7% of net sales in 1999, and approximately 47.5% of net sales in the first three months of 2000. Our sales to customers in Asia represented approximately 12.1% of net sales in 1998, approximately 35.3% of net sales in 1999, and approximately 31.9% of net sales in the first three months of 2000.

      Recently, we signed an exclusive distributorship agreement with Mitsui Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan. Under this agreement, Mitsui will market and sell our LCiD and LCoS products to customers in Japan.

Customers

      Our strategy involves concentrating our efforts on providing design and production services to leading companies in mobile handsets and other wireless communications, data collection, medical equipment, and other commercial and consumer marketplaces. As a result, we derive our net sales from services provided to a limited number of customers.

      Our largest customer is Motorola. Sales to Motorola accounted for approximately 84.9% of our net sales in the first three months of 2000, 86.1% of our net sales in 1999, and 63.6% of our net sales in 1998. No customer other than Motorola accounted for more than 10.0% of our net sales in 1998, 1999, or the first three months of 2000. Sales to Motorola currently are made through multiple national and international buyers, and products are delivered to diverse geographical regions throughout the world including Asia, North America, and Europe. Substantially all of our net sales to Motorola have been for mobile handset applications, and we are currently in the design or manufacturing phase for more than 20 of their programs. Motorola has an LCD module allocation process in which it designates key LCD module vendors, including us, and communicates to each vendor the anticipated annual range of purchases. Although the allocation process does not provide a guarantee of business to us, it provides an indication that purchases by Motorola during 2000 could exceed 1999 levels. See “Risk Factors — Motorola accounts for a significant portion of our sales.”

      One of our key strategic goals is to diversify our customer base while increasing our sales to Motorola. During the first quarter of 2000, we secured 11 new design wins. The design wins were for LCD modules to be used in products such as mobile handsets, data collection devices, and MP3 players. Of the 11 design wins, seven are for new customers, five of which are mobile handset manufacturers. We anticipate that production shipments for several of these design wins will commence in the second half of 2000. However, design wins do not assure the commercial introduction or success of a product. See “Risk Factors — We are subject to lengthy development periods and product acceptance cycles.”

Backlog

      As of March 31, 2000, we had a backlog of orders of approximately $37.1 million. The backlog of orders as of December 31, 1999 was approximately $46.3 million. Our backlog consists of product orders for which confirmed purchase orders have been received and which are scheduled for shipment within 12 months. Most orders are subject to rescheduling or cancellation by the customer with limited penalties. Because of the possibility of customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellations and potential delays in product shipments, our backlog as of a particular date may not be indicative of net sales for any succeeding period.

36


Table of Contents

Manufacturing Services, Facilities, and Quality Control

Manufacturing Services

      We have organized our manufacturing geographically to optimize the combination of technology and labor factors. This organization enables us to compete solely on the basis of cost, if necessary, with suppliers of similar products and services throughout the world. Our advanced manufacturing techniques include surface mount technologies, chip-on-board, chip-on-flex, chip-on-glass, flip-chip, tape automated bonding, and sophisticated testing systems throughout these processes.

      We seek to increase our value to our customers by providing responsive, flexible, total manufacturing services. To date, our manufacturing services have been concentrated on the manufacture of LCDs and assembly of display modules that we have designed. We provide extended manufacturing services beyond these core services, however, if the customer requires them. Extended services may include adding additional components, such as keypads, microphones, speakers, light guides, and optics, or the turnkey manufacture of a complete assembly.

Manufacturing Facilities

      We currently conduct manufacturing operations in Arizona; Manila, the Philippines; and Beijing, China. The Arizona facility houses a Class 1000 “clean room” and LCD fabrication and prototyping operation. We utilize this facility primarily to conduct LCD research and development, to produce prototype and pre-production runs of devices for customer approval, to conduct full production runs of low-volume devices, and to develop advanced manufacturing processes that can be applied in Manila and Beijing during full-scale production. In addition, the facility has the largest fully automated LCD production capacity in North America. This highly automated line enables us to eliminate substantially our dependence on foreign suppliers of LCDs. Facility personnel include a team of experts ranging from LCD research scientists to specialized engineers with backgrounds in electronics, mechanics, chemistry, physics, and manufacturing. We maintain a wide variety of state-of-the-art testing and quality control equipment at the facility.

      We have also recently completed a dedicated LCoS microdisplay production line at our Arizona facility. As a result of capacity and line-balancing issues, we decided to operate the LCoS microdisplay fabrication line separately from the LCD line. We are also completing construction of new clean rooms so that we can perform all manufacturing, packaging, and module assembly for LCoS products at our Arizona facility.

      We conduct high-volume LCD module manufacturing in Manila and Beijing. In Manila, we are a party to a sub-assembly agreement with Technology Electronic Assembly and Management Pacific Corporation, or TEAM, under which TEAM supplies direct manufacturing services at a facility that TEAM owns and that is located on land TEAM leases from the Philippine government. We also are party to a lease agreement with TEAM under which TEAM leases space to us with respect to the manufacturing operations services that TEAM performs under the sub-assembly agreement. At the leased facility, TEAM manufactures, assembles, and tests devices that we design pursuant to procedures set forth in the sub-assembly agreement in accordance with our specifications. Under the sub-assembly agreement, TEAM supplies only the direct labor and certain incidental services required to manufacture our products. We own the manufacturing, assembling, and testing equipment, including automated die attach and wire bond equipment with automatic pattern recognition features for die and wire placement for LED die, as well as the processes and documentation that TEAM uses at the Manila facility. We pay TEAM for the direct manufacturing personnel based upon a negotiated available hourly rate. We employ all professional personnel, including an operations manager, with a support staff consisting of manufacturing supervisors; manufacturing, quality, and process engineers; and logistics and administrative personnel at the Manila facility.

      Our sub-assembly agreement and lease agreement with TEAM extend through December 31, 2000, and each is renewable from year to year thereafter. We have occupied this facility for more than 10 years. The sub-assembly agreement requires us to maintain minimum production levels. The termination of the lease agreement or sub-assembly agreement or the inability of TEAM to fulfill its requirements under the sub-assembly agreement would require us to acquire additional manufacturing facilities or to contract for

37


Table of Contents

additional manufacturing services. See “Risk Factors — We depend on our manufacturing operations in the Philippines.” We are considering establishing an additional production facility in Manila during the last half of 2000. In such event, we would likely retain the TEAM facility because of expected capacity requirements in 2001.

      Our Beijing facility is a high-volume display module manufacturing facility similar to our current facility in Manila. We initially leased a facility in Beijing on a temporary basis, and we commenced manufacturing at this facility in the third quarter of 1998. We completed the construction of our permanent facility in Beijing in July 1999, and all production during and subsequent to the fourth quarter of 1999 occurred in that new facility. We employ all of the direct and indirect manufacturing employees at the facility, including technicians, supervisors, and engineers.

Quality Control

      We recognize the need to maintain a strong reputation for quality as a means of retaining existing customers and securing additional orders from them as well as attracting new customers. We have an extensive quality control program and maintain at each of our facilities quality systems and processes that meet or exceed the demanding standards set by many leading OEMs in targeted industries. We base our quality control program upon statistical process control, which advocates continual quantitative measurements of crucial parameters and uses those measurements in a closed-loop feedback system to control the manufacturing process. We perform product life testing to help ensure long-term product reliability. We analyze results of product life tests and take actions to refine the manufacturing process or enhance the product design.

      Increased global competition has led to increased customer expectations with respect to price, delivery, and quality. Customers often evaluate price in the quotation process and evaluate delivery and quality only after receiving the product. Therefore, many customers preview a company’s quality by viewing the quality systems employed. We have received ISO 9002 and QS 9000 certification of our Manila manufacturing facility. ISO and QS are quality standards established by international organizations that attempt to ensure that the processes used in development and production remain consistent. This is accomplished through documentation maintenance, training, and management review of the processes used. Although achieving an ISO 9002 or QS 9000 certification does not assure that we will obtain future business, it is a factor that enables our customers to recognize that our production processes meet these established, global standards of performance.

Components and Raw Materials

      Components and raw materials constitute a substantial portion of our product costs. The principal components and raw materials we use in producing our displays consist of LCD glass, application specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, circuit boards, molded plastic parts, lead frames, and packaging materials. Our procurement strategy is to secure alternative sources of supplies for the majority of these materials. Many of these, however, must be obtained from foreign suppliers, which subjects us to the risks inherent in obtaining materials from foreign sources, including supply interruptions and currency fluctuations. With one exception, our suppliers generally are meeting our requirements, and we believe our strategic supplier alliances have further strengthened our relations with offshore suppliers. We experienced material shortages of ASICs in 1999 and the first quarter of 2000 as a result of the increased worldwide demand for cellular handsets. These shortages prevented us from meeting customer demand for certain of our products. The shortage of ASICs is expected to continue through 2000. This shortage and similar shortages in other materials could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Research, Development, and Engineering

      We conduct an active and ongoing research, development, and engineering program that focuses on advancing technology, developing improved design and manufacturing processes, and improving the overall quality of the products and services that we provide. Our goal is to provide our customers with new solutions

38


Table of Contents

that address their needs. Research and development personnel concentrate on LCD technology, especially on improving the performance of current products and expanding the technology to serve new markets. We also conduct research and development in manufacturing processes, including those associated with efficient, high-volume production and electronic packaging.

      With the availability of our high-volume LCD manufacturing line in Arizona, we are focusing our research and development efforts on new display technologies. We expect that these advanced display technologies will enable us to provide our customers with differentiating products or products that provide higher information content. These new technologies include active addressing, sunlight readable LCDs, color LCDs, plastic LCDs, bi-stable LCDs, graphics and color graphics, organic and polymer light emitting displays, and pixel-related display technologies. These products may be available for use in custom devices or in standard devices. We have undertaken a significant research and development program and made substantial investments with respect to the development of our LCoS microdisplays for potential use in projectors, monitors, digital and high-definition televisions, and portable applications. We expect that the majority of our available research and development personnel hours will be dedicated to LCoS microdisplays in 2000.

      In October 1999, we signed a letter agreement with Tecdis S.p.A., a European-based LCD company, to form an ASIC design center in Chatillon, Italy. The ASIC design center will be known as Dora and will focus on the design of ASICs necessary to drive the LCDs we and Tecdis design for our respective customers. Recently, STMicroelectronics announced its participation in Dora and its agreement to manufacture the ASICs designed by Dora.

      In February 2000, we established a strategic relationship with Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corporation to develop reflective color LCD displays. We expect that manufacturers of mobile handsets, Internet appliances, and smart phones will soon begin to use color LCD displays. Reflective color displays utilize ambient light to illuminate the display. As a result, reflective color displays use less power than other types of color displays, which is important for portable products where battery life is a critical factor.

Intellectual Property

      We rely on a variety of intellectual property methods including patents, trade secrets, trademarks, confidentiality agreements, licensing agreements, and other forms of contractual provisions to protect and advance our intellectual property. Although our existing LCD display business has not historically depended on intellectual property protection, we are manufacturing more advanced display products for which we are actively seeking intellectual property protection. For example, our LCiD technology is patented. We have also applied for numerous other process, product, and design patents, all related to display technologies. There can be no assurance that any of these patents will be issued to us.

      We have also taken several steps to both protect and advance our LCoS microdisplay technology.

  •  We filed several patents relating to our LCoS microdisplay technology. These patents cover the areas of product design and manufacturing process technology.
 
  •  In July 1999, we purchased the assets, including all production and test equipment, specialized laboratory equipment, and supporting design documentation and software, of the former Light Valve business unit of National Semiconductor. We also hired several key scientists of that business unit and acquired an exclusive, paid-up, royalty free license on all of the patents and intellectual property related to that business unit. This license covers all intellectual property relating to the processing, packaging, and testing of light valves and the integrated circuits necessary to manufacture and sell both light valves and light engines.
 
  •  In August 1999, we licensed the microdisplay technology of S-Vision Corporation, a former microdisplay competitor that had recently ceased operations. Under this agreement, we acquired an irrevocable, royalty free, fully paid-up, worldwide license to the intellectual property associated with S-Vision’s digital backplane and optical systems, which provides us rights to manufacture certain

39


Table of Contents

  microdisplay products and patented optical engines. In addition, S-Vision assigned to us a patent relating to the design and manufacture of microdisplay products.

Competition

      We believe that Hosiden, Hyundai, Optrex, PCI, Philips, Samsung, Seiko-Epson, Seiko Instruments, and Sharp constitute the principal competitors for our passive LCD devices. Most of these competitors are large companies that have greater financial, technical, marketing, manufacturing, vertical integration, and personnel resources than we do. Our sales, profitability, and success depend substantially upon our ability to compete with other providers of display modules. We cannot provide assurance that we will continue to be able to compete successfully with these organizations.

      We currently compete principally on the basis of the technical innovation, engineering service, and performance of our display modules, including their ease of use and reliability, as well as on their cost, timely design, and manufacturing and delivery schedules. Our competitive position could be adversely affected if one or more of our customers, particularly Motorola, determines to design and manufacture their display modules internally or secures them from other parties.

      Other large companies are currently pursuing microdisplay solutions. Texas Instruments has developed a product, referred to as a DMD microdisplay, that competes with our LCoS technology, and IBM and JVC are producing a similar liquid crystal on silicon display based on their own technology. Numerous other established and start-up companies are also pursuing similar and related technologies that may compete with our LCoS technology.

Environmental Regulations

      Our operations create a small amount of hazardous waste, including various epoxies, gases, inks, solvents, and other wastes. The amount of hazardous waste we produce may increase in the future depending on changes in our operations. The general issue of the disposal of hazardous waste has received increasing focus from federal, state, local, and international governments and agencies and has been subject to increasing regulation.

Employees

      As of March 31, 2000, we employed a total of 2,162 persons, of whom 1,114 were employed through third-party contracts. Of our direct employees, 201 were full-time and 14 were temporary employees at our principal U.S. facility in Arizona and U.S. sales offices; 237 were employees at our manufacturing facility in Manila; 588 were employees at our manufacturing facility in Beijing; and 8 were employees at our Three-Five Systems Limited subsidiary in Swindon, England. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good, and none of our employees currently are represented by a union in collective bargaining with us.

      TEAM provides the personnel engaged in the direct assembly of our devices in Manila under the sub-assembly agreement between us and TEAM. As of March 31, 2000, 1,114 persons performed direct labor operations at the Manila facility through the sub-assembly agreement with TEAM.

40


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding our directors, executive officers and key employees:

             
Name Age Position Held



Jack L. Saltich 56 President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Jeffrey D. Buchanan 45 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director
Carl E. Derrington 49 Vice President, Chief Manufacturing Officer
Robert L. Melcher 60 Chief Technology Officer
Robert T. Berube 61 Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller
James F. Bowser 58 Vice President — New Business Development
Charles K. Rahrig 44 Vice President — Design Engineering
Dan J. Schott 60 Vice President — Research and Development
Elizabeth A. Sharp 38 Vice President — Corporate Relations
Robert W. Harrison 39 Senior Director — LCD Marketing and Sales
Allan L. Davis 47 Senior Director — Microdisplay Marketing and Sales
David C. Malmberg(1) 57 Chairman of the Board
Kenneth M. Julien(2) 46 Director
Gary R. Long(1)(2) 68 Director
Thomas H. Werner(1)(2) 40 Director
David P. Chavoustie(1)(2) 56 Director

(1)  Member of the compensation committee.
(2)  Member of the audit committee.

      Jack L. Saltich has served as a director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of our company since July 1999. Mr. Saltich served as Vice President of Advanced Micro Devices from May 1993 until July 1999; as Executive Vice President of Applied Micro Circuits Corp. from January 1991 until March 1993; and as Vice President of VLSI from July 1988 until January 1991. Mr. Saltich held a variety of executive positions for Motorola from July 1971 until June 1988. These positions included serving as an Engineering Manager from May 1974 until January 1980, an Operation Manager from January 1980 until May 1982, Vice President and Director of the Bipolar Technology Center from May 1982 until June 1986, and Vice President and Director of the Advanced Product Research and Development Laboratory from June 1986 until June 1988.

      Jeffrey D. Buchanan has served as a director and Executive Vice President — Finance, Administration, and Legal of our company since June 1998; as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since June 1996; and as Secretary since May 1996. Mr. Buchanan served as our Vice President — Finance, Administration, and Legal from June 1996 until July 1998 and as our Vice President — Legal and Administration from May 1996 to June 1996. Mr. Buchanan served from June 1986 until May 1996 as a business lawyer with O’Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Killingsworth & Beshears, where his practice emphasized mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, and taxation. Mr. Buchanan was associated with the international law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine from 1984 to 1986, and he was a senior staff person at Deloitte & Touche from 1982 to 1984. Mr. Buchanan is a member of the Arizona and Washington state bars and passed the certified public accounting examination in 1983.

41


Table of Contents

      Carl E. Derrington has been our Chief Manufacturing Officer since May 1999. Dr. Derrington joined our company in 1986 as Director of Research and Development. Since that time, Dr. Derrington has served as Plant Manager from January 1986 until September 1987, Director of Engineering from September 1987 until August 1989, Director of Manufacturing from August 1989 until April 1996, and Director of Manufacturing Engineering from April 1996 until April 1999.

      Robert L. Melcher has been our Chief Technology Officer since October 1999. Prior to joining our company, Dr. Melcher was employed at IBM in a variety of management positions since 1970. He served as the Program Leader for Projection Displays from 1993 to 1999 and as Director of the Physical Sciences Department from 1990 to 1993.

      Robert T. Berube has been our Principal Accounting Officer since July 1998 and has served as our Corporate Controller since July 1990. Mr. Berube served as Chief Financial Officer of Electronic Research Associate, Inc., a manufacturing company, from July 1977 until April 1990.

      James F. Bowser has been our Vice President — New Business Development since June 1998. He has also served as our Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Vice President of Operations, Director of Sales, and Senior Vice President of Marketing and New Product Development at various times since August 1990. From 1985 until August 1990, Mr. Bowser worked for National Computer Systems, a producer of hardware and software for the financial and educational market sectors, as Vice President and General Manager, Financial Systems Division, and as Vice President of Operations.

      Charles K. Rahrig has been our Vice President — Design Engineering since September 1998. He joined our company in July 1996 as our Director of Program Management. From 1979 until 1996, Mr. Rahrig held a variety of technical and management posts at Honeywell, Inc., including Engineering Section Head from 1988 until 1992 and Engineering Department Manager from 1992 until his departure in 1996.

      Dan J. Schott has been our Vice President — Research and Development since July 1996. From January 1994 until July 1996, he served as our Vice President of Technology. From 1988 to January 1994, Mr. Schott was an Associate Director with Honeywell Inc., where his responsibilities included flat panel display research and development. From 1981 until 1987, Mr. Schott held various engineering management and program management positions with Sperry Rand Corp.

      Elizabeth A. Sharp has been our Vice President — Corporate Relations since April 1996. Ms. Sharp served as our Director of Human Resources from May 1992 until April 1996, as our Corporate Administrator from April 1988 until May 1992, as our Personnel Manager from April 1987 until April 1988, and as our Administrative Assistant to the President and Chief Financial Officer from May 1986 until April 1987.

      Robert W. Harrison has been our Senior Director — LCD Marketing and Sales since June 1999. Mr. Harrison served as a display industry consultant from August 1998 until joining our company. He was General Manager for display products for Hyundai Electronics America for CRT, flat panel and passive LCD products from April 1995 until August 1998. From January 1994 until April 1995, Mr. Harrison was the Eastern Regional Sales Manager for Three-Five Systems. He held various regional sales management and strategic sales managerial positions with Optrex America, Inc., a manufacturer of liquid crystal displays, from August 1998 until January 1994, including Strategic Sales Manager to Motorola and Xerox.

      Allan L. Davis has been our Senior Director — Microdisplay Marketing and Sales since September 1999. From January 1997 to September 1999, Mr. Davis served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for S-Vision, Incorporated, a microdisplay design company. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Davis was Director of Flat Panel Displays Group at Fujitsu Microelectronics, Incorporated. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Davis held several executive operations, product and sales and marketing positions, including Business Development Manager for Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, a developer of electronic intelligence and semiconductor technology; Senior Business Development Manager for Science Applications International Corporation, a developer of technology for government applications; and President and Chief Operating Office for Notebook Computer Company.

42


Table of Contents

      David C. Malmberg has been a director of our company since April 1993 and Chairman of the Board since April 1999. Mr. Malmberg is a private investor and management consultant. Before resigning in May 1994, Mr. Malmberg spent 22 years at National Computer Systems, including 13 years as its President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Malmberg serves as the Chairman of the Board of National City Bancorporation and Fieldworks, Inc., and is a member of the board of directors of PPT/ Vision, Inc., all publicly held companies. He also serves on the Board of Trustees for Minnesota State University, Mankato.

      Kenneth M. Julien has been a director of our company since October 1996. Mr. Julien has served as President and a director of Julien Aerospace Systems, Inc., an aerospace parts supplier, since November 1996 and as Managing Director of Julien Investments LLC, a real estate development and lending company, since August 1994. Mr. Julien served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from August 1992 to April 1993; as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of our company or one of our predecessors from May 1988 to August 1992; and as a director of our company or one of its predecessors from July 1987 to May 1990. Mr. Julien served as a Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cerprobe Corporation, a publicly held company engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, and marketing semiconductor test equipment, from October 1983 to May 1988. Mr. Julien also served as a director of Cerprobe from February 1988 to June 1988 and currently serves on the board of Alanco Technologies, Inc., a public company.

      Gary R. Long has been a director of our company since October 1996. Mr. Long served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CalComp Technology, Inc., a computer peripherals company, from January 1994 until his retirement in February 1997. Mr. Long served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of CalComp’s Digitizer Products Division in Scottsdale, Arizona, from 1980 to January 1994. Prior to 1980, Mr. Long served as Vice President of Operations for Talos Systems, which designed and manufactured digitizers for the computer graphics industry.

      Thomas H. Werner has been a director of our company since March 1999. Mr. Werner has served as Vice President and General Manager for the Business Connectivity Division of 3Com Corporation since October 1998. From January 1996 until September 1998, Mr. Werner was Vice President of the Manufacturing Personal Communication Division of U.S. Robotics, which 3Com Corporation acquired in June 1997. Mr. Werner also served in various positions at Oak Frequency Control, a manufacturer of telecommunications components, most recently as President of the Networks Group, from February 1994 until January 1996.

      David P. Chavoustie has been a director of our company since January 2000. From April 1998 to present, Mr. Chavoustie has served as Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing of ASML, a manufacturer of lithography equipment used to manufacture semiconductors. From April 1992 until March 1998, Mr. Chavoustie held several positions with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., a semiconductor company, including Vice President/ General Manager Customer Specific Products Division, Vice President/ General Manager Embedded Processor Division, and Vice President Worldwide Sales/ Marketing — Vantis (a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMD). From 1985 to 1992, Mr. Chavoustie held various positions with VLSI Technology, Inc., an ASIC semiconductor company, including Sales Director, Vice President Sales and Corporate Marketing, and Senior Vice President/ General Manager ASIC Products. From 1974 to 1984, Mr. Chavoustie held various sales positions with Advanced Micro Devices, including area sales — Southeast United States, regional sales manager, and district sales manager — Upstate New York.

      Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.

43


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock on April 20, 2000, as adjusted to reflect the three-for-two stock split effected on or about May 12, 2000 to holders of record on May 1, 2000, by (1) each of our directors and executive officers, and (2) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. We are not aware of any person who owns more than 5% of our common stock. Each of our directors and executive officers may be reached through us at 1600 North Desert Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85281.

         
Number of Shares
Name of Beneficial Owner Beneficially Owned(1)(2)(3)


Directors and Executive Officers:
Jack L. Saltich(4) 3,999
Jeffrey D. Buchanan(5) 166,179
Carl E. Derrington(6) 88,301
Robert L. Melcher(7)
Robert T. Berube(8) 1,646
David C. Malmberg(9) 57,017
Kenneth M. Julien(10) 11,417
Gary R. Long(11) 15,917
Thomas H. Werner(12) 3,348
David P. Chavoustie(13)
All directors and executive officers as a group (ten persons) 347,824

 (1)  Includes, when applicable, shares owned of record by the stockholder’s minor children and spouse and by other related individuals and entities over whose shares of common stock such person has custody, voting control, or power of disposition.
 
 (2)  The number of shares shown includes the shares of common stock which the person will have the right to acquire within 60 days of April 20, 2000. In calculating the percentage of ownership, all shares which the identified person will have the right to acquire within 60 days of April  20, 2000 upon the exercise of vested stock options are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of shares owned by such person, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of shares owned by any other person.
 
 (3)  The number of shares beneficially owned by each of the identified persons represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares. The number of shares held by all directors and executive officers as a group represents 1.83% of the outstanding shares prior to the offering and 1.61% after the offering.
 
 (4)  Does not include 400,002 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.
 
 (5)  Includes 110,000 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options, but does not include 120,003 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.
 
 (6)  Includes 300 shares held by Mr. Derrington as custodian for his minor child and 16,001 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options, but does not include 94,001 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.
 
 (7)  Does not include 120,002 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.
 
 (8)  Includes 1,301 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options, but does not include 15,702 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.
 
 (9)  Includes 9,003 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options.
 
(10)  Includes 1,398 shares held by Mr. Julien as custodian for his minor children and 5,003 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options.

44


Table of Contents

(11)  Includes 8,649 shares held by the Long Revocable Trust, Gary R. Long and Carol  L. Long, Trustees and 5,003 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options.
 
(12)  Includes 666 shares issuable upon exercise of vested stock options, but does not include 1,355 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.
 
(13)  Does not include 1,500 shares issuable upon exercise of unvested stock options.

45


Table of Contents

UNDERWRITING

      We are offering the shares of common stock described in this prospectus through a number of underwriters. Banc of America Securities LLC and Needham & Company, Inc. are the representatives of the underwriters. We have entered into a firm commitment underwriting agreement with the representatives. Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters, and each underwriter has agreed to purchase, the number of shares of common stock listed next to its name below at the public offering prices less the underwriting discounts and commissions on the cover page of this prospectus:

           
Underwriters Number of Shares


Banc of America Securities LLC
Needham & Company, Inc. 
ING Barings LLC

Total 2,600,000

      The underwriting agreement is subject to a number of terms and conditions and provides that the underwriters must buy all of the shares if they buy any of them. The underwriters will sell the shares to the public when and if the underwriters buy the shares from us.

      The underwriters initially will offer shares to the public at the price specified on the cover page of this prospectus. The underwriter may allow to some dealers a concession of not more than $       per share. The underwriters may also allow, and any other dealers may reallow, a concession of not more than $       per share to some other dealers. If all the shares are not sold at the public offering price, the underwriters may change the public offering price and the other selling terms. No change in the selling terms will vary the proceeds to be received by us as specified on the cover page of this prospectus. The common stock is offered subject to a number of conditions, including:

  •  receipt and acceptance of the common stock by the underwriters; and
 
  •  the right on the part of the underwriters to reject orders in whole or in part.

      We have granted the underwriters an option to buy up to 390,000 additional shares of common stock. These additional shares would cover sales of shares by the underwriters that exceed the number of shares specified in the table above. The underwriters may exercise this option at any time within 30 days after the date of this prospectus. If the underwriters exercise this option, they will each purchase, subject to a number of terms and conditions, additional shares approximately in proportion to the amounts specified in the table above.

      The following table shows the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters. These amounts are shown assuming no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares.

                 
Full
No Exercise Exercise


Per share underwriting discounts and commissions $ $
Total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by us $ $

46


Table of Contents

      The expenses of the offering, not including underwriting discounts and commissions, are estimated to be approximately $360,000 and will be paid by us. Expenses of the offering, exclusive of underwriting discounts and commissions, include the SEC filing fee, printing expenses, transfer agent and registration and other miscellaneous fees.

      We and our executive officers and directors have entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters. Under these agreements, subject to exceptions, we may not issue any new shares of common stock, and our executive officers and directors may not offer, sell, contact to sell, or otherwise dispose of or hedge any common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock. These restrictions will be in effect for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus. At any time and without notice, Banc of America Securities LLC and Needham & Company, Inc. jointly may, in their sole discretion, release all or some of the securities from these lock-up agreements.

      We will indemnify the underwriters against some liabilities, including some liabilities under the Securities Act. If we are unable to provide this indemnification, we will contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.

      In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. These transactions may include:

  •  short sales;
 
  •  over-allotment;
 
  •  purchases to cover positions created by short sales; and
 
  •  stabilizing transactions.

      Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in this offering. In order to cover a short position, the underwriters may bid for and purchase shares of common stock in the open market or may exercise their over-allotment option. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock while this offering is in progress.

      The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This means that if the representatives purchase shares in the open market in stabilizing transactions or to cover short sales, the representatives can require the underwriters that sold those shares as part of this offering to repay the underwriting discount received by them.

      As a result of these activities, the price of the common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If the underwriters commence these activities, they may discontinue them at any time. The underwriters may carry out these transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.

LEGAL MATTERS

      The validity of the common stock offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Phoenix, Arizona. Certain legal matters relating to this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, Palo Alto, California. Members of Greenberg Traurig, LLP own a total of approximately 21,000 shares of our common stock.

EXPERTS

      The audited financial statements included in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as indicated in their reports with respect thereto, and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving said reports.

47


Table of Contents

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

      We have filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance we refer you to the copy of the contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference.

      For further information with respect to Three-Five Systems, Inc. and the common stock offered by this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement, exhibits and schedules. A copy of the registration statement may be inspected by anyone without charge at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC in Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549; the Chicago Regional Office, Suite 1400, 500 West Madison Street, Citicorp Center, Chicago, Illinois 60661; and the New York Regional Office, Suite 1300, 7 World Trade Center, New York, New York 10048. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, upon payment of the prescribed fees. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The registration statement is also available through the SEC’s Web site at the following address: http://www.sec.gov.

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

      The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the information we file with it, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus and information we file later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any future filings made by us with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 until the sale of all of the shares of common stock that are part of this offering. The documents we are incorporating by reference are as follows:

  •  our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed on March 14, 2000;
 
  •  our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, filed on April 26, 2000;
 
  •  the description of our common stock contained in our registration statement on Form 8-A (Registration No. 1-4373) declared effective by the SEC on December 28, 1994, including any amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating that description; and
 
  •  our Proxy Statement, filed on March 28, 2000.

      Any statement contained in a document that is incorporated by reference will be modified or superseded for all purposes to the extent that a statement contained in this prospectus (or in any other document that is subsequently filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference) modifies or is contrary to that previous statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed a part of this prospectus except as so modified or superceded.

      You may request a copy of these filings at no cost by writing or telephoning our investor relations department at the following address and telephone number:

  Three-Five Systems, Inc.
  1600 North Desert Drive
  Tempe, Arizona 85281
  (602) 389-8600

48


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         
Page

Report of Independent Public Accountants F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1999 and March 31, 2000 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 and the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 and the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000 F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7

F-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Three-Five Systems, Inc.:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

  /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

  January 21, 2000

F-2


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)
                             
December 31, March 31,


1998 1999 2000



(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,946 $ 45,363 $ 45,413
Accounts receivable, net 18,601 20,886 18,509
Inventories 12,493 12,344 12,865
Deferred tax asset 2,680 3,231 4,202
Other current assets 2,313 1,047 1,839



Total current assets 41,033 82,871 82,828
Property, Plant and Equipment, net 33,314 40,546 42,171
Other Assets, net 3,557 3,513 4,001



$ 77,904 $ 126,930 $ 129,000



LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 10,649 $ 13,450 $ 10,153
Accrued liabilities 4,673 7,526 6,279
Current taxes payable 235 1,042 3,096
Current portion of long-term debt 651



Total current liabilities 16,208 22,018 19,528



Long-term Debt 7,444



Deferred Tax Liability 3,156 3,692 3,711



Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 15,949,802 shares issued, 14,010,215 shares outstanding at December 31, 1998; 18,859,138 shares issued, 18,858,549 shares outstanding at December 31, 1999 159 189 190
Additional paid-in capital 32,484 67,388 68,343
Retained earnings 26,770 33,639 37,226
Cumulative translation adjustment 8 7 5
Less — Treasury stock, at cost; 1,939,587 shares at December 31, 1998 and 589 shares at December 31, 1999 (8,325 ) (3 ) (3 )



Total stockholders’ equity 51,096 101,220 105,761



$ 77,904 $ 126,930 $ 129,000



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

F-3


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)
                                           
Three Months Ended
Years Ended December 31, March 31,


1997 1998 1999 1999 2000





(unaudited)
Net Sales $ 84,642 $ 95,047 $ 147,408 $ 23,044 $ 39,162





Costs and Expenses:
Cost of sales 64,760 76,149 117,583 20,191 29,360
Selling, general, and administrative 6,557 7,334 11,170 2,449 2,262
Research, development, and engineering 5,106 7,159 8,745 1,821 2,763





76,423 90,642 137,498 24,461 34,385





Operating income (loss) 8,219 4,405 9,910 (1,417 ) 4,777





Other Income (Expense):
Interest, net 548 75 51 (155 ) 604
Other, net (190 ) (117 ) (69 ) (30 ) (24 )





358 (42 ) (18 ) (185 ) 580





Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 8,577 4,363 9,892 (1,602 ) 5,357
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 3,334 1,773 2,968 (960 ) 1,770





Net income (loss) $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924 $ (642 ) $ 3,587





Earnings (loss) Per Common Share:
Basic $ 0.33 $ 0.17 $ 0.44 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.19





Diluted $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.43 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.18





Weighted Average Number of Common Shares:
Basic 15,708,107 15,277,262 15,563,121 14,018,060 18,926,154





Diluted 16,179,950 15,604,082 16,005,050 14,018,060 20,047,340





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999
(in thousands, except share data)
                                                                   
Common Stock Total

Additional Cumulative Stock- Compre-
Shares Paid-in Retained Translation Treasury Holders’ hensive
Issued Amount Capital Earnings Adjustment Stock Equity Income








Balance, December 31, 1996 15,559,658 $ 155 $ 32,329 $ 18,939 $ 14 $ (253 ) $ 51,184
Net income 5,243 5,243 $ 5,243
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation adjustments 6 6 6

Comprehensive income $ 5,249

Stock options exercised 296,388 3 50 (2 ) 51
Early disposition of incentive stock options 41 41







Balance, December 31, 1997 15,856,046 158 32,420 24,180 20 (253 ) 56,525
Net income 2,590 2,590 $ 2,590
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation adjustments (12 ) (12 ) (12 )

Comprehensive income $ 2,578

Stock options exercised 93,756 1 64 65
Purchase of treasury stock (8,072 ) (8,072 )







Balance, December 31, 1998 15,949,802 159 32,484 26,770 8 (8,325 ) 51,096
Net income 6,924 6,924 $ 6,924
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation adjustments (1 ) (1 ) (1 )

Comprehensive income $ 6,923

Stock options exercised 150,650 2 184 (1 ) 41 226
Warrants issued 555 555
Early disposition of incentive stock options 30 30
Sale of common stock, net of offering expenses of $3,007. 2,758,686 28 34,135 (54 ) 8,281 42,390







Balance, December 31, 1999 18,859,138 $ 189 $ 67,388 $ 33,639 $ 7 $ (3 ) $ 101,220







The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)
                                                 
Three Months
Ended
Years Ended December 31, March 31,


1997 1998 1999 1999 2000





(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924 $ (642 ) $ 3,587
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
Provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 4,135 4,693 5,898 1,279 1,590
Provision for (reduction of) accounts receivable valuation reserves (69 ) (64 ) 234 45 57
Loss on disposal of assets 2
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (5,641 ) (5,997 ) (2,519 ) 898 2,319
(Increase) decrease in inventories (3,649 ) (4,238 ) 149 (784 ) (520 )
(Increase) decrease in other assets 505 (1,425 ) 1,271 (328 ) (788 )
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,778 1,730 5,654 1,544 (4,544 )
Increase in taxes payable and deferred taxes, net 1,461 2,649 823 73 1,100





Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 6,765 (62 ) 18,434 2,085 2,801





CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (3,050 ) (8,119 ) (12,537 ) (2,727 ) (3,205 )
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 19
Investment in Inviso, Inc. (3,320 ) (500 )





Net cash used in investing activities (3,031 ) (11,439 ) (12,537 ) (2,727 ) (3,705 )





CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from (payments on) notes payable to banks 8,095 (8,095 ) 3,000
Stock options exercised 51 65 226 65 956
Purchase of treasury stock (8,072 )
Net proceeds from equity offering 42,390





Net cash provided by financing activities 51 88 34,521 3,065 956





Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 6 (12 ) (1 ) (2 )





NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 3,791 (11,425 ) 40,417 2,423 50
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year 12,580 16,371 4,946 4,946 45,363





CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year $ 16,371 $ 4,946 $ 45,363 $ 7,369 $ 45,413





SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid $ 4 $ 364 $ 914



Income taxes paid, net of refunds $ 1,973 $ 992 $ 2,209



SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Value of warrants granted $ $ $ 555



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999

(1) Organization and Operations:

      Three-Five Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) offers advanced design and manufacturing services to a wide range of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Most of the Company’s sales consist of custom display modules developed in close collaboration with its customers. Modules designed and manufactured by the Company are used in mobile handsets and other wireless communication devices as well as in the data collection, medical electronics, and other commercial and consumer marketplaces. The Company currently specializes in liquid crystal display (LCD) components and technology in providing its design and manufacturing services for its customers. The Company markets its services primarily in North America, Europe, and Asia through direct technical sales persons and, to a much lesser extent, through an independent sales and distribution network.

      The Company currently conducts manufacturing operations in Tempe, Arizona; Manila, the Philippines; and Beijing, China. The Company believes that the Arizona facility has the largest fully automated LCD glass production capacity in North America. High-volume LCD module manufacturing is done in Manila, the Philippines and Beijing, China. In Manila, a third-party subcontractor operates the facility under a sub-assembly agreement with the Company utilizing equipment, processes, and documentation owned by the Company. The sub-assembly agreement has a current term extending through December 31, 2000, and from year to year thereafter, but may be terminated by either party upon 180 days written notice. The termination of or the inability of the Company to obtain products pursuant to the sub-assembly agreement, even for a relatively short period, would have a material adverse effect on the operations and profitability of the Company. The Company commenced manufacturing operations in China during 1998. The China facility is a high-volume LCD module manufacturing facility similar to the Company’s facility in Manila. The Company initially leased a facility in Beijing on a temporary basis, which expired in mid-1999, and the Company commenced manufacturing operations in that temporary facility in the second quarter of 1998. In July 1999, the Company completed construction of its own facility in Beijing and commenced manufacturing operations in the new facility in September of 1999.

      The Company’s strategy involves concentrating its efforts on providing design and production services to leading companies in a limited number of fast-growing industries. The Company has been undertaking substantial efforts to diversify its business, broaden its customer base, and expand its markets. The Company’s historical major customer accounted for approximately 35%, 64%, and 86% of the Company’s net sales in 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively and 75% (unaudited) and 84.9% (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000, respectively. This increased percentage occurred principally as a result of increased sales to that customer. The Company’s other significant customer accounted for 32% of the Company’s net sales during 1997 and less than 10% of the Company’s net sales during both 1998 and 1999 and the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000, respectively (unaudited). A significant decrease in orders for the Company’s products from the Company’s historical major customer or a decline in the demand for mobile handsets would result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

      The significant amount of sales to a few customers results in certain concentrations of credit risk for the Company. The Company’s accounts receivable balance, including the accounts receivable of the Company’s largest customers, is comprised of customers, primarily in the mobile handset, computer hardware, and other electronic products industries. These customers are located primarily in the United States, Asia and Europe.

F-7


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

  Principles of Consolidation and Preparation of Financial Statements

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

      Three-Five Systems Limited (Limited), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is incorporated in the United Kingdom. Limited sells and distributes the Company’s products to customers on the European continent.

      Three-Five Systems Pacific, Inc. (Pacific), a wholly owned Philippines corporation, procures supplies primarily from Philippine vendors. Pacific also manages and assists production personnel of the third-party subcontractor that operates the facility in the Philippines.

      During the first quarter of 1998, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary in China, Three-Five Systems (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (Beijing). Beijing manufactures and sells the Company’s products to customers primarily located in Asia.

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

  Unaudited Interim Results

      The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2000, and for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000, together with the related notes, are unaudited. The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and its cash flows as of March 31, 2000 and for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 2000. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2000 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2000.

  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

      The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by the Company using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in estimating fair values. Accordingly, the estimates may not be indicative of amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange. The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these instruments. In addition, at December 31, 1998, the carrying amount on the outstanding revolving line of credit facility is estimated to approximate fair value as the actual interest rate is consistent with rates estimated to be currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

  Cash Equivalents

      For purposes of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of investments in commercial paper, marketable debt securities, money market mutual funds, and United States government agencies’ obligations. A portion of the Company’s funds held in money market mutual funds are invested in repurchase agreements. These repurchase agreements are collateralized by U.S. Treasury and

F-8


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Government obligations. Cash equivalents were $1,992,000 and $42,962,000 at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively.

  Inventories

      Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. Write-downs are established against Company-owned inventories for excess, slow-moving, and obsolete items and for items where the net realizable value is less than cost. The write-downs totaled $1,125,000 and $3,028,000 at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively.

      Inventories consist of the following at (in thousands):

                         
December 31,

March 31,
1998 1999 2000



(unaudited)
Raw materials $ 9,367 $ 9,554 $ 9,033
Work-in-process 1,459 1,336 1,770
Finished goods 1,667 1,454 2,062



$ 12,493 $ 12,344 $ 12,865



  Property, Plant and Equipment

      Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and generally is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from 3 to 39 years. Depreciation expense totaled $4,094, $4,653 and $5,860 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. During 1996, the Company placed into service a high-volume LCD manufacturing line in its Tempe, Arizona manufacturing facility. The Company is depreciating the LCD manufacturing line using the units of production method. Depreciation expense recorded using this method may be subject to significant fluctuation from year to year resulting from changes in actual production levels and ongoing analysis of the capacity of the equipment. Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at (in thousands):

                         
December 31,

March 31,
1998 1999 2000



(unaudited)
Building and improvements $ 13,031 $ 16,411 $ 16,411
Furniture and equipment 37,324 47,036 50,242



50,355 63,447 66,653
Less accumulated depreciation (17,041 ) (22,901 ) (24,482 )



$ 33,314 $ 40,546 $ 42,171



      The Company utilizes a significant portion of the high-volume LCD manufacturing line at its Arizona facility to produce a substantial portion of its own requirements for LCDs and intends, at least initially, to produce all of its microdisplays on a dedicated line at this facility. Any event that causes a disruption of the operation of this facility for even a relatively short period of time would adversely affect the Company’s ability to provide both technical and manufacturing support for its customers. Such disruptions could require the Company to purchase its LCD requirements from third parties, resulting in the Company’s inability to recover its investment in the LCD manufacturing facility.

F-9


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

  Accrued Liabilities

      Accrued liabilities include accrued compensation of approximately $975,000 and $3,788,000 at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively.

  Income Taxes

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires the use of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect when these differences are expected to reverse.

  Foreign Currency Translation

      Financial information relating to the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is reported in accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. The functional currency of Pacific is the same as the local currency. The gain or loss resulting from the translation of Pacific’s financial statements has been included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Non-U.S. assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the year-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates during the year.

      The functional currency of Beijing and Limited is the U.S. dollar. Beijing, however, maintains its books and records in the renminbi. Therefore, the Company utilizes the remeasurement method of foreign currency translation when Beijing is consolidated. Any resulting remeasurement gain or loss is reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

      The net foreign currency transaction loss in 1997, 1998, and 1999 was $183,000, $177,000, and $49,000, respectively, and has been included in other expenses in the accompanying statements of income.

  Revenue Recognition

      The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment. The Company provides reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable. These reserves totaled $431,000 and $650,000 at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of all of its customers and considers various factors in establishing its allowance for doubtful accounts.

  Research, Development, and Engineering

      Research, development, and engineering costs are expensed as incurred. The Company currently is incurring research, development, and engineering costs for several new technologies that it plans to introduce in the future. There is a risk that some or all of those technologies may not successfully make the transition from the research, development, and engineering lab to cost-effective manufacturable products.

  Earnings Per Share

      During 1997, the Company adopted SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Pursuant to SFAS No. 128, basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share are determined

F-10


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

assuming that outstanding options and warrants were exercised at the beginning of each year or at the time of issuance, if later. Set forth below are the disclosures required pursuant to SFAS No. 128:

                                               
Three Months Ended
Years Ended December 31, March 31,


1997 1998 1999 1999 2000





(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Basic earnings per share:
Income available to common stockholders $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924 $ (642 ) $ 3,587





Weighted average common shares 15,708 15,277 15,563 14,018 18,926





Basic per share amount $ 0.33 $ 0.17 $ 0.44 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.19





Diluted earnings per share:
Income available to common stockholders $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924 $ (642 ) $ 3,587





Weighted average common shares 15,708 15,277 15,563 14,018 18,926
Options and warrants assumed exercised 472 327 442 1,121





Total common shares plus common stock equivalents 16,180 15,604 16,005 14,018 20,047





Diluted per share amount $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.43 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.18





  Recently Issued Accounting Standards

      In 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income,which requires companies to report all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investment by owners and distribution to owners, in a financial statement for the period in which they are recognized. The Company has chosen to disclose comprehensive income, which encompasses net income and foreign currency translation adjustments, in the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity. Prior years have been restated to conform to the SFAS No. 130 requirements.

      Comprehensive income (loss) for the interim periods are as follows:

                   
Three Months Ended
March 31,

1999 2000


(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Net income (loss) $ (642 ) $ 3,587
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (2 )


Comprehensive income (loss) $ (642 ) $ 3,585


      In 1998, the Company also adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The new rules establish revised standards for public companies relating to the reporting of financial and descriptive information about their operating segments in financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 131 and all of the required disclosures. (See Note 8.)

      In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. The issuance of SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133,” delayed the required effective date of SFAS No. 133 to all

F-11


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 133 during the year ending December 31, 2001. Management does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 133 will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.

(3)  Long-Term Debt:

      Long-term debt consists of the following at (in thousands):

                 
December 31,

1998 1999


$15.0 million revolving line of credit, interest due monthly at the bank’s prime rate (8.5% at December 31, 1999) or at the LIBOR base rate (6.13% at December 31, 1999) plus 1.75%, unpaid balance due May 22, 2000, secured by all assets of the Company other than real property $ $
$10.0 million revolving line of credit/term loan, interest due monthly at the bank’s prime rate or at the LIBOR base rate plus 2.375%, unpaid balance due August 5, 2004, secured by all assets of the Company other than real
property
8,095
$350,000 United Kingdom credit facility, interest due quarterly at the bank’s base rate plus 2%, unpaid balance due July 15, 2000, secured by Limited’s accounts receivable


8,095
Less current maturities (651 )


$ 7,444 $


      In November 1998, the Company entered into a commitment from Imperial Bank and the National Bank of Canada for a $25.0 million credit facility. This credit facility consists of (i) a $15.0 million revolving line of credit for general corporate needs, and (ii) a $10.0 million term loan, which provides available funds to repurchase a portion of the Company’s common stock. Under this credit facility the Company is required to apply all proceeds from the sale of any treasury stock to the outstanding principal balance of the term loan. The credit facility also contains restrictive covenants that include, among other things, restrictions on the declaration or payment of dividends and the amount of capital expenditures. The credit facility also requires the Company to maintain a specified net worth, as defined, to maintain required debt to equity ratio, and to maintain certain other financial ratios.

      On January 21, 2000, the Company entered into a new $25.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit with Imperial Bank, which matures on January 19, 2001. This new revolving line of credit bears interest at the bank’s prime rate, or at the LIBOR base rate plus 1.5%, and is payable monthly. The new revolving line of credit contains restrictive covenants that include, among other things, restrictions on the declaration or payment of dividends and the sale or transfer of assets. The new revolving line of credit facility also requires the Company to maintain a specified net worth, as defined, to maintain a required debt to equity ratio, and to maintain certain other financial ratios.

(4)  Stockholders Equity:

      On November 8, 1999, the Board of Directors approved a four-for-three stock split, effective in the form of a 33 percent stock dividend. The stock split was paid on December 17, 1999, to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 3, 1999. This stock split has been given retroactive recognition for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

      On April 18, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a three-for-two stock split, to be effected in the form of a stock dividend. The Board’s approval of the stock split was contingent upon the approval by the stockholders of an increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock, which occurred on

F-12


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

April 27, 2000. At this time, the stockholders approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from 15 million to 60 million. The stock dividend will be paid on or about May 12, 2000, to stockholders of record at the close business on May 1, 2000. The increase in the authorized shares and the stock split have been given retroactive recognition for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

      In July 1999, the Company purchased certain assets and licensed silicon technologies from National Semiconductor relating to liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS™) microdisplays for approximately $3.0 million in cash and warrants, with a fair market value of $555,000 as determined by the Black-Scholes method, to purchase 140,000 shares of common stock at a price of $8.47 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. The warrants become exercisable on July 12, 2000 and expire on July 12, 2002.

      In September 1999, the Company issued 4,000,226 shares of common stock at $9.69 per share (the Offering). The Offering consisted of 4,600,000 shares of common stock comprised of 4,000,226 newly issued Company shares and 599,774 shares sold by an existing shareholder. In October 1999, the Company issued 690,000 shares of common stock at $9.69 per share to cover over-allotments pertaining to the Offering.

(5)  Benefit Plans:

      The Company has five stock option plans, the 1990 Stock Option Plan (1990 Plan), the 1993 Stock Option Plan (1993 Plan), the 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (1994 Plan), the 1997 Stock Option Plan (1997 Plan), and 1998 Stock Option Plan (1998 Plan).

  1990 Stock Option Plan

      Under the 1990 Plan, there were options issued but unexercised to purchase 203,277 shares as of December 31, 1999. In conjunction with stockholder approval of the 1993 Plan, the Board terminated the 1990 Plan with respect to unissued options to purchase 170,909 shares of common stock, which remained and were unissued as of the date the 1993 Plan was adopted. The exercise prices of options are determined by the plan administrator, but may not be less than 100% (110% if the option is granted to a stockholder who at the time the option is granted owns stock representing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). The 1990 Plan will remain in force through May 1, 2000.

      The expiration date, maximum number of shares purchasable, and the other provisions of the options granted under the 1990 Plan were established at the time of grant. Options were granted for terms of up to ten years and become exercisable in whole or in one or more installments at such times as were determined by the Board of Directors upon grant of the options.

  1993 Stock Option Plan

      The 1993 Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase up to 770,909 shares of the Company’s common stock (which includes 170,909 shares previously reserved for issuance under the Company’s 1990 Plan), the direct granting of common stock (stock awards), the granting of stock appreciation rights (SARs) and the granting of other cash awards (cash awards; stock awards, SARs, and cash awards are collectively referred to herein as Awards). Under the 1993 Plan, options and Awards may be issued to key personnel and others providing valuable services to the Company. The options issued may be incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. If any option or SAR terminates or expires without having been exercised in full, stock not issued under such option or SAR will again be available for grant pursuant to the 1993 Plan. There were options outstanding to acquire 721,029 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 1993 Plan at December 31, 1999.

      To the extent that granted options are incentive stock options, the terms and conditions of those options must be consistent with the qualification requirement set forth in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the

F-13


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Code). The expiration date, maximum number of shares purchasable, and the other provisions of the options will be established at the time of grant. Options may be granted for terms of up to ten years and become exercisable in whole or in one or more installments at such time as may be determined by the plan administrator upon grant of the options. The exercise prices of options are determined by the plan administrator, but may not be less than 100% (110% if the option is an incentive stock option granted to a stockholder who at the time the option is granted owns stock representing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company) of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant. The 1993 Plan will remain in force until February 24, 2003.

  1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan

      During 1999, the Board of Directors amended the 1994 Plan to decrease the number of available shares for issuance from 200,000 shares to 100,000 shares.

      The 1994 Plan provides for the automatic grant of stock options to non-employee directors to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Under the 1994 Plan, options to acquire 500 shares of common stock will be automatically granted to each non-employee director at the meeting of the Board of Directors held immediately after each annual meeting of stockholders, with such options to vest in a series of 12 equal and successive monthly installments commencing one month after the annual automatic grant date. In addition, each non-employee director serving on the Board of Directors on the date the 1994 Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders received an automatic grant of options to acquire 1,000 shares of common stock and each subsequent newly elected non-employee member of the Board of Directors receives an automatic grant of options to acquire 1,000 shares of common stock on the date of their first appointment or election to the Board of Directors. Those options become exercisable and vest in a series of three equal and successive annual installments, with the first such installment becoming exercisable immediately after the director’s second successive election to the Board of Directors (the First Vesting Date), the second installment becoming exercisable 10 months after the First Vesting Date, and the third installment becoming exercisable 22 months after the First Vesting Date (provided that the director has not ceased serving as a director prior to a vesting date). A non-employee member of the Board of Directors is not eligible to receive the 500 share automatic option grant if that option grant date is within 30 days of such non-employee member receiving the 1,000 share automatic option grant. The exercise price per share of common stock subject to options granted under the 1994 Plan will be equal to 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date such options are granted. There were outstanding options to acquire 19,008 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 1994 Plan at December 31, 1999.

  1997 Stock Option Plan

      On January 27, 2000, the Board of Directors increased the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 1997 Plan from 200,000 shares to 350,000 shares (unaudited).

      The 1997 Plan provides for the granting of nonqualified options. Under the 1997 Plan, options may be issued to key personnel and others providing valuable services to the Company. The options issued will be nonqualified stock options and shall not be incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code. Any option that expires or terminates without having been exercised in full will again be available for grant pursuant to the 1997 Plan. There were options outstanding to acquire 199,038 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 1997 Plan at December 31, 1999.

      The expiration date, maximum number of shares purchasable, and the other provisions of the options will be established at the time of grant. Options may be granted for terms of up to ten years and become exercisable in whole or in one or more installments at such time as may be determined by the plan administrator upon grant of the options. The exercise prices of the options are determined by the plan administrator, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant. The 1997 Plan will remain in force until May 12, 2007.

F-14


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

  1998 Stock Option Plan

      During 1999, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 1998 Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued from 600,000 shares to 1,100,000 shares.

      The 1998 Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options and/or nonqualified options. Under the 1998 Plan, options may be issued to key personnel and others providing valuable services to the Company. The options issued will be incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code. Any option that expires or terminates without having been exercised in full will again be available for grant pursuant to the 1998 Plan. There were options outstanding to acquire 593,007 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 1998 Plan at December 31, 1999.

      The expiration date, maximum number of shares purchasable, and the other provisions of the options will be established at the time of grant. Options may be granted for terms of up to ten years and become exercisable in whole or in one or more installments at such time as may be determined by the plan administrator upon grant of the options. The exercise prices of the options are determined by the plan administrator, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant (110% if the option is an incentive stock option granted to a stockholder who at the time the option is granted owns stock representing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). The 1998 Plan will remain in force until January 28, 2008.

      Tax benefits from early disposition of common stock by optionees with incentive stock options are credited to additional paid-in capital.

      A summary of the status of the Company’s five stock option plans at December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 and changes during the years then ended, are presented in the table and narrative below:

                                                 
1997 1998 1999



Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Options Price Options Price Options Price






Outstanding at beginning of year 1,103,621 $ 3.46 1,110,014 $ 5.54 1,399,706 $ 6.10
Granted 409,022 7.39 669,689 6.93 1,019,944 8.52
Exercised (324,615 ) .65 (94,046 ) .54 (157,470 ) 1.94
Expired (78,014 ) 6.11 (285,951 ) 7.72 (526,821 ) 6.56



Outstanding at end of year 1,110,014 $ 5.54 1,399,706 $ 6.10 1,735,359 $ 7.76



Exercisable at end of year 330,210 455,060 447,678



Weighted average fair value of options granted $ 5.51 $ 5.13 $ 6.54



      The weighted average fair value of options granted for the years ended 1997, 1998 and 1999 were $7.39, $6.93 and $8.52, respectively.

F-15


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 1999:

                                         
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable


Number Weighted Average Number
Range of Outstanding at Remaining Weighted Average Exercisable at Weighted Average
Exercise December 31, Contractual Exercise December 31, Exercise
Prices 1999 Life Price 1999 Price






$ 0.12 – $ 4.50 54,745 6.7 $ 2.63 16,742 $ 0.38
  4.51 –  10.00 1,448,600 8.0 7.14 393,933 6.57
 10.01 –  23.33 232,014 9.3 12.84 37,003 11.30





1,735,359 8.1 $ 7.76 447,678 $ 6.73





      Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company accounts for transactions with its employees pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, under which no compensation cost has been recognized. However, the Company has computed for pro forma disclosure purposes the value of all options granted during 1997, 1998 and 1999, using the Black-Scholes option pricing method with the following weighted assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 5.45%, 4.52%, and 6.34%; expected dividend yields of zero; expected lives of 6.4, 6.6, and 6.2 years; and expected volatility (a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate during a period) of 60.0%, 61.4%, and 61.9%. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been as follows:

                           
Years Ended December 31,

1997 1998 1999



(in thousands, except per share data)
Net income:
As reported $ 5,243 $ 2,590 $ 6,924
Pro forma 4,636 1,980 5,393
Basic earnings per share:
As reported $ 0.33 $ 0.17 $ 0.44
Pro forma 0.30 0.13 0.35
Diluted earnings per share:
As reported $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.43
Pro forma 0.29 0.13 0.34

      The pro forma compensation costs reflected in the above table were $994,000, $1,028,000 and $2,187,000, for the years ended 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively.

     401(k) Profit Sharing Plan

      Effective September 1, 1990, the Company adopted a profit sharing plan (401(k) Plan) pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Code. The 401(k) Plan covers substantially all full-time employees who meet the eligibility requirements and provides for a discretionary profit sharing contribution by the Company and an employee elective contribution with a discretionary Company matching provision. The Company expensed discretionary contributions pursuant to the 401(k) Plan in the amount of $71,000, $100,000, and $159,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively.

F-16


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(6)  Income Taxes:

      The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31 consists of the following (in thousands):

                               
1997 1998 1999



Current, net of operating loss carryforwards and tax credits utilized:
Federal, net of tax benefit from early termination of incentive stock options $ 356 $ (509 ) $ 2,619
States 97 (24 ) 210
Foreign 71 237 832



524 (296 ) 3,661
Deferred provision (benefit) 2,769 2,069 (723 )
Tax benefit from early termination of incentive stock
options, reflected in stockholders’ equity 41 30



Provision for income taxes $ 3,334 $ 1,773 $ 2,968



      In accordance with SFAS No. 109, a tax benefit for net operating losses of approximately $35,000, $-0-,
and $-0-, and tax credits of approximately $-0-, $-0-, and $115,362 were utilized in 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively, are included as a reduction of the current provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of income.

      The components of deferred taxes at December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

                   
1998 1999


Net long-term deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated tax depreciation $ 3,156 $ 3,229
Investments in foreign affiliates 463


$ 3,156 $ 3,692


Net short-term deferred tax assets:
Inventory reserve $ 436 $ 1,140
Uniform capitalization 1,076 692
Accrued liabilities not currently deductible 1,022 1,128
Allowance for doubtful accounts 156 233
Other (10 ) 38


$ 2,680 $ 3,231


      A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

                         
1997 1998 1999



Statutory federal rate 34 % 34 % 34 %
Effect of state taxes 5 3 3
Foreign earnings taxed at different rates (4 )
Other, net 4 3
Benefit from prior year state refund claims (6 )



39 % 41 % 30 %



      The favorable state tax benefit is the result of settled state refund claims from prior years.

F-17


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      A deferred U.S. tax liability has not been provided on the undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries because it is the intent of the Company to permanently reinvest such earnings. Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which have been or are intended to be permanently invested in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 23, Accounting for Income Taxes — Special Areas, aggregated approximately $990,000 at December 31, 1999.

(7)  Commitments and Contingencies:

      In March 1995, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for its primary manufacturing facility in Manila, the Philippines. The lease has a current term extending through December 31, 2000, and from year-to-year thereafter, but may be terminated by either party upon 180 days written notice. In April 1995, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for an additional manufacturing facility in Manila, the Philippines. This lease expired March 31, 2000 and has been renewed through March 31, 2001 (unaudited).

      Rent expense was approximately $793,000, $917,000, and $763,000, for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively.

      In April 1994, the Company entered into a ground lease (with purchase options) on a 5.7 acre site in Tempe, Arizona. Annual lease payments under the ground lease, which will expire on March 31, 2069, subject to renewal and purchase options as well as termination provisions, will average approximately $100,000 over the term of the lease subject to certain escalation provisions. A design, manufacturing, and corporate headquarters facility containing approximately 97,000 square feet was completed on the land in 1995 at a cost of approximately $10.4 million. During 1996, the Company entered into a transaction, in which it conveyed its Tempe, Arizona facility and certain improvements to the City of Tempe as consideration for a rent-free 75-year lease. The Company has the option to repurchase the facility for $1,000 after ten years; therefore, the lease is accounted for as a capital lease.

      The Company’s future lease commitments under the non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 1999 are as follows (in thousands):

         
2000 $ 466
2001 160
2002 144
2003 100
Thereafter 6,524

$ 7,394

      The Company is involved in certain administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate settlement of these administrative proceedings will not materially impact its financial position or results of operations.

(8)  Segment Information:

      The Company offers advanced design and manufacturing services to a wide range of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). The majority of the Company’s sales are attributed to the LCD product line. The Company’s products are included in end-user devices for the following product categories: communication devices, office, industrial, medical and commercial electronics.

      Management monitors and evaluates the financial performance of the Company’s operations by its four operating segments located throughout the world. These segments consist of three manufacturing operations,

F-18


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

located in the United States, China, and the Philippines, and a sales and distribution operation in the United Kingdom.

      The following operating segment information includes financial information (in thousands) for all four of the Company’s operating segments. Financial information for the China operation is presented beginning from the date those operations commenced, June 1998.

                                                 
United United
States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total






December 31, 1997
Net sales $ 83,023 $ 10,755 $ $ 3,107 $ (12,243 ) $ 84,642
Income before provision for income taxes 7,990 436 104 47 8,577
Provision for income taxes 3,263 32 39 3,334
Depreciation 4,058 27 9 4,094
Total assets 68,039 4,896 354 (454 ) 72,835
Capital expenditures 3,036 14 3,050
                                                 
United United
States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total






December 31, 1998
Net sales $ 92,251 $ 33,438 $ 7,205 $ 3,010 $ (40,857 ) $ 95,047
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes 4,643 676 (947 ) (2 ) (7 ) 4,363
Provision for income taxes 1,537 209 27 1,773
Depreciation 4,408 36 168 41 4,653
Total assets 60,514 9,195 12,301 642 (4,748 ) 77,904
Capital expenditures 2,809 10 5,298 2 8,119
                                                 
United United
States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total






December 31, 1999
Net sales $ 134,028 $ 68,798 $ 40,257 $ 3,291 $ (98,966 ) $ 147,408
Income before provision for income taxes 6,381 1,624 2,147 65 (325 ) 9,892
Provision for income taxes 2,140 811 17 2,968
Depreciation 4,983 21 856 5,860
Total assets 101,562 10,421 19,235 696 (4,984 ) 126,930
Capital expenditures 7,459 9 5,624 13,092
                                                 
United United
States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total






Three Months Ended March 31, 1999 (unaudited)
Net sales $ 6,948 $ 10,351 $ 5,745 $ $ $ 23,044
Intersegment sales 15,091 1,145 791 (17,027 )
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes (1,954 ) 137 57 15 143 (1,602 )

F-19


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

                                                 
United United
States Kingdom China Philippines Eliminations Total






Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 (unaudited)
Net sales $ 15,597 $ 18,596 $ 4,969 $ $ $ 39,162
Intersegment sales 19,063 4,723 699 (24,485 )
Income before provision for income taxes 1,499 1,485 2,413 14 (54 ) 5,357

      Net sales are generated from the sale of LCD display devices, which are applied in several different end-use products. Total net sales by these product categories are as follows (in thousands):

                           
Years Ended December 31,

1997 1998 1999



Mobile handsets and other wireless communication devices $ 31,415 $ 62,073 $ 128,634
Office automation equipment 33,528 12,658 7,908
Other 19,699 20,316 10,866



Total $ 84,642 $ 95,047 $ 147,408



(9)  Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

      The following table summarizes the unaudited consolidated quarterly results of operations as reported for 1998 and 1999 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

                                                                   
Quarters Ended

1998 1999


Mar. 31 June 30 Sep. 30 Dec. 31 Mar. 31 June 30 Sep. 30 Dec. 31








Net sales $ 18,479 $ 22,682 $ 24,572 $ 29,314 $ 23,044 $ 31,600 $ 42,723 $ 50,041
Gross profit 4,792 5,587 2,329 6,190 2,853 6,497 8,841 11,634
Net income (loss) 995 1,123 (403 ) 875 (642 ) 1,040 2,037 4,489
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic $ 0.06 $ 0.07 $ (0.03 ) $ 0.06 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.07 $ 0.14 $ 0.24








Diluted $ 0.06 $ 0.07 $ (0.03 ) $ 0.06 $ (0.05 ) $ 0.07 $ 0.14 $ 0.23








F-20


Table of Contents

Inside Back Cover

Top: (heading) “High-Volume World Class Manufacturing”; beneath the heading are subheadings and text, in bullet point form. The subheadings and text read, “Tempe, Arizona: LCD/ microdisplay manufacturing; High-volume automated LCD manufacturing line; Design, research and technology center; Total quality management; Manila, The Philippines: Display module manufacturing/ assembly; ISO 9002 certified; Highly trained work force; Advanced manufacturing techniques; Capacity: approximately 14 million modules per year; Beijing, China: Display module manufacturing/ assembly; Positioned for emerging growth markets; Cost effective labor; Capacity: approximately 12 million modules per year”

Right-margin: Three pictures of assembly lines from the three manufacturing facilities.


Table of Contents



2,600,000 Shares

[THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS LOGO]


Prospectus

             , 2000

Banc of America Securities LLC

Needham & Company, Inc.

ING Barings




Table of Contents

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 14.  Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

      The following table sets forth the expenses in connection with the offering described in the Registration Statement. All such expenses are estimates except for the SEC registration fee and NASD and New York Stock Exchange filing fees.

         
SEC registration fee $ 40,786

NYSE filing fee 6,000

Blue Sky fees and expenses 5,000

NASD fee 16,000

Transfer agent and registrar fees 5,000

Accountants’ fees and expenses 30,000

Legal fees and expenses 200,000

Printing and engraving expenses 50,000

Miscellaneous fees 7,214

Total $ 360,000

Item 15.  Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

      The Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant provide that the Registrant will indemnify and advance expenses, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, to each person who is or was a director or officer of the Registrant, or who serves or served any other enterprise or organization at the request of the Registrant (an “Indemnitee”).

      Under Delaware law, to the extent that an Indemnitee is successful on the merits in defense of a suit or proceeding brought against him or her by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, or agent of the Registrant, or serves or served any other enterprise or organization at the request of the Registrant, the Registrant shall indemnify him or her against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action.

      If unsuccessful in defense of a third-party civil suit or a criminal suit, or if such a suit is settled, an Indemnitee may be indemnified under Delaware law against both (i) expenses, including attorneys’ fees, and (ii) judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Registrant, and, with respect to any criminal action, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

      If unsuccessful in defense of a suit brought by or in the right of the Registrant, where the suit is settled, an Indemnitee may be indemnified under Delaware law only against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred in the defense or settlement of the suit if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Registrant except that if the Indemnitee is adjudged to be liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his or her duty to the Registrant, he or she cannot be made whole even for expenses unless a court determines that he or she is fully and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses.

      Also under Delaware law, expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, or proceeding may be paid by the Registrant in advance of the final disposition of the suit, action, or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the officer or director to repay such amount if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by the Registrant. The

II-1


Table of Contents

Registrant may also advance expenses incurred by other employees and agents of the Registrant upon such terms and conditions, if any, that the board of directors of the Registrant deems appropriate.

Item 16.  Exhibits.

  (a)  Exhibits

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibits


* 1 Underwriting Agreement
3 (a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant(1)
* 3 (b) Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
3 (c) Bylaws of the Company(2)
4 Specimen Stock Certificate(2)
* 5 Opinion of Greenberg Traurig, LLP
* 23 (a) Consent of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (to be included in its Opinion filed as Exhibit 5)
23 (b) Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
24 Power of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers (included on the signature page of this Registration Statement)
27 Financial Data Schedule

 *   To be filed by amendment.
 
(1)  Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 1994, as filed with the Commission on or about May 12, 1994.
 
(2)  Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-84083) as filed on July 30, 1999, as amended on August 26, 1999, and declared effective September 27, 1999.

  (b)  Financial Statement Schedules

      Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

      All other schedules have been omitted on the basis of immateriality or because such schedules are not otherwise applicable.

Item 17.  Undertakings.

      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

      Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit, or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such

II-2


Table of Contents

indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

      (1)  For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

      (2)  For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-3


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Phoenix, state of Arizona, on April 27, 2000.

  THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.

  By:  /s/ JEFFREY D. BUCHANAN
 
  Jeffrey D. Buchanan
  Executive Vice President

POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the persons whose signatures appear below constitute and appoint jointly and severally, Jack L. Saltich, Jeffrey D. Buchanan, and Robert T. Berube and each one of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including pre-effective and post-effective amendments) to this registration statement, and to sign any registration statement and amendments thereto for the same offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all which said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do, or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

         
Signature Title Date



/s/ JACK L. SALTICH

Jack L. Saltich
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) April 27, 2000
 
/s/ JEFFREY D. BUCHANAN

Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director (Principal Financial Officer) April 27, 2000
 
/s/ ROBERT T. BERUBE

Robert T. Berube
Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) April 27, 2000
 
/s/ DAVID C. MALMBERG

David C. Malmberg
Chairman of the Board April 27, 2000
 
/s/ GARY R. LONG

Gary R. Long
Director April 27, 2000

II-4


Table of Contents

         
Signature Title Date



/s/ KENNETH M. JULIEN

Kenneth M. Julien
Director April 27, 2000
 
/s/ THOMAS H. WERNER

Thomas H. Werner
Director April 27, 2000
 
/s/ DAVID P. CHAVOUSTIE

David P. Chavoustie
Director April 27, 2000

II-5


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Three-Five Systems, Inc.:

      We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the financial statements included in Three-Five Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated January 21, 2000. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken as a whole. The schedule shown on page S-2 is the responsibility of the Company’s management and is presented for the purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

  /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

  January 21, 2000

S-1


Table of Contents

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999
                                           
Balance at Charged to Charged to
beginning of Costs and Other Balance at
Period Expenses Accounts Other End of Period





(in thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns and allowances:
Year ended 12/31/97 $ 649 $ (105 ) $ 36 1 $ $ 580
Year ended 12/31/98 580 (24 ) (40 )1 516
Year ended 12/31/99 516 219 15 1 750

(1)  Actual return activity

S-2


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibits


* 1 Underwriting Agreement
3 (a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant(1)
* 3 (b) Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
3 (c) Bylaws of the Company(2)
4 Specimen Stock Certificate(2)
* 5 Opinion of Greenberg Traurig, LLP
* 23 (a) Consent of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (to be included in its Opinion filed as Exhibit 5)
23 (b) Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
24 Power of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers (included on the signature page of this Registration Statement)
27 Financial Data Schedule

 *   To be filed by amendment.
 
(1)  Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 1994, as filed with the Commission on or about May 12, 1994.
 
(2)  Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-84083) as filed on July 30, 1999, as amended on August 26, 1999, and declared effective September 27, 1999.


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission