<PAGE> 1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 20, 1996.
Registration No. 333-02263
===============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1 to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Missouri
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
3621
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)
43-0259330
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
8000 West Florissant Avenue
St. Louis, Missouri 63136
(314) 553-2000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)
HARLEY M. SMITH, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
8000 West Florissant Avenue
St. Louis, Missouri 63136
(314) 553-2431
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copy to:
Frederick W. Scherrer, Esq. Donald A. Denton, Esq.
Bryan Cave LLP Hancock & Estabrook, LLP
One Metropolitan Square 1500 Mony Tower I
211 North Broadway, Suite 3600 Post Office Box 4976
St. Louis, MO 63102 Syracuse, NY 13221
(314) 259-2000 (315) 471-3151
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective
and all other conditions to the merger (the "Merger") of a subsidiary of the
Registrant with and into Lipe-Rollway Corporation pursuant to the Agreement and
<PAGE> 2
Plan of Merger described in the enclosed Proxy Statement/Prospectus have been
satisfied or waived.
If any the securities being registered on this form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. [ ]
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT
SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING
PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.
===============================================================================
<PAGE> 3
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
Cross Reference Sheet pursuant to Rule 404(a) of the Securities Act of 1933
and Item 501(b) of Regulation S-K showing the location or heading in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus of information required by Part I of Form S-4.
Item in Form S-4 Location or Heading in Proxy
Statement/Prospectus
- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
A. Information about the Transaction.
1. Forepart of Registration
Statement and Outside Front
Cover Page of Prospectus. . . Facing Page; Cross Reference Sheet;
Outside Front Cover Page
2. Inside Front and Outside Back
Cover Pages of Prospectus . . Available Information; Incorporation
of Certain Documents by Reference;
Table of Contents
3. Risk Factors, Ratio of
Earnings to Fixed Charges,
and Other Information . . . . Summary
4. Terms of the Transaction. . . Summary; The Rollway Special Meeting;
Information About Emerson; Information
About Rollway; The Merger; Certain
Provisions of the Merger Agreement;
Comparative Rights of Shareholders
5. Pro Forma Financial
Information . . . . . . . . . Not Applicable
6. Material Contacts With the
Company Being Acquired. . . . Summary; The Merger; Certain
Provisions of the Merger Agreement
7. Additional Information
Required For Reoffering by
Persons and Parties Deemed
to be Underwriters. . . . . . Not Applicable
8. Interests of Named Experts
and Counsel . . . . . . . . . Legal Matters; Experts
9. Disclosure of Commission
Position on Indemnification
for Securities Act
Liabilities . . . . . . . . . Not Applicable
B. Information About the Registrant.
10. Information With Respect to
S-3 Registrants . . . . . . . Available Information; Incorporation
of Certain Documents by Reference
<PAGE> 4
11. Incorporation of Certain
Information by Reference. . . Available Information; Incorporation
of Certain Documents by Reference
12. Information With Respect to
S-2 or S-3 Registrants. . . . Not Applicable
13. Incorporation of Certain
Information by Reference. . . Not Applicable
14. Information With Respect to
Registrants Other Than
S-3 or S-2 Registrants. . . . Not Applicable
C. Information About the Company Being Acquired.
15. Information With Respect to
S-3 Companies . . . . . . . . Not Applicable
16. Information With Respect to
S-2 or S-3 Companies. . . . . Not Applicable
17. Information With Respect to
Companies Other Than S-2 or
S-3 Companies . . . . . . . . Summary; Information About Rollway;
Rollway Financial Statements
D. Voting and Management Information.
18. Information if Proxies,
Consents or Authorizations
Are to be Solicited . . . . . Available Information; Incorporation
of Certain Documents by Reference;
Summary; The Merger; The Rollway
Special Meeting; Information About
Rollway; Dissenting Shareholder Rights
19. Information if Proxies,
Consents or Authorizations
Are Not to be Solicited, or
in an Exchange Offer. . . . . Not Applicable
<PAGE> 5
Lipe-Rollway Corporation
7600 Morgan Road
Liverpool, New York 13090 [.........., 1996]
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a Special Meeting of Shareholders of
Lipe-Rollway Corporation ("Rollway"), which will be held at the offices of
Rollway, 7600 Morgan Road, Liverpool, New York 13090, at 10:00 a.m., local
time, on [.........., 1996] (together with all adjournments and postponements
thereof, the "Rollway Special Meeting").
At the Rollway Special Meeting holders of shares of common stock, par value
$0.50 per share ("Rollway Common Stock"), will be asked to consider and vote
upon a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
April 1, 1996 and as amended April 11, 1996 and .........., 1996 (the "Merger
Agreement"), by and among Emerson Electric Co. ("Emerson"), Emersub XLI, Inc.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerson ("Emersub"), and Rollway. Under the
Merger Agreement, Emersub will be merged with and into Rollway (the "Merger").
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the consideration payable to the
holders of shares of Rollway Common Stock will be approximately $8,270,000,
subject to adjustment as provided in the Merger Agreement (collectively, the
"Merger Consideration"). For example, if the closing of the Merger had
occurred on June ....., 1996, the Merger Consideration would have been adjusted
downward by approximately $.......... pursuant to the post-closing adjustment
provisions set forth in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement. This
would have resulted in a Merger Consideration of approximately $.......... (or
approximately $.......... per share of Rollway Common Stock), subject to the
terms of the Escrow Agreement described herein. See "The Merger -- Merger
Consideration" and "The Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity" in the accompanying
Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The foregoing example is based upon Rollway's
internal, unaudited balance sheet for the fiscal month ended June ....., 1996,
which has not been subjected to a year-end accounting audit or the specific
audit provisions prescribed in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement.
Accordingly, changes in Rollway's financial condition between June ....., 1996
and the closing date of the Merger, as well as any adjustments necessitated by
the Closing Date audit contemplated by the Merger Agreement, may have a
material effect on the amount of the Merger Consideration. See "The Merger --
Merger Consideration in the accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The
consideration will be paid in shares of the common stock, par value $1.00 per
share, of Emerson ("Emerson Common Stock") which will be valued at the average
closing price of the Emerson Common Stock during the five consecutive trading
days ending on .........., 1996, which is five days prior to the Rollway
Special Meeting. The Emerson Common Stock will be issuable pro rata to holders
of shares of Rollway Common Stock at the time of the Merger. However, no
fractional shares of Emerson Common Stock will be issued, and cash will be paid
in lieu thereof. As a consequence of the Merger, Rollway will be the surviving
corporation and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerson. A copy of
the Merger Agreement is annexed to the accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus
as Exhibit A.
Additionally, at the Rollway Special Meeting, the holders of Rollway Common
Stock and the holders of shares of $1.00 Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock, par value $10.00, of Rollway ("Rollway Preferred Stock") will be asked
to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment (the "Preferred
Terms Amendment") to the terms of the Rollway Preferred Stock. The full text
of the Preferred Terms Amendment is provided in the accompanying Proxy
Statement/Prospectus under the heading "Merger -- Preferred Terms Amendment."
Upon approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment, subject to the consummation of
the Merger, each outstanding share of Rollway Preferred Stock will be converted
<PAGE> 6
in the Merger into the right to receive a fraction of a share of Emerson Common
Stock (valued as described above) equal in value to $20.00 and an amount in
cash equal to the amount of accrued and unpaid dividends owed on such share of
Preferred Stock at the effective time of the Merger ($2.50 per Rollway
Preferred Share as of June ....., 1996). However, no fractional shares of
Emerson Common Stock will be issued, and cash will be paid in lieu thereof.
The cash and Emerson Common Stock payable to the holders of the Rollway
Preferred Stock will not be paid out of the Merger Consideration, but will be
in addition thereto. If the Merger is approved and approval of the Preferred
Terms Amendment is not obtained, then Rollway shall redeem all of the
outstanding shares of Rollway Preferred Stock for cash in an amount equal to
$20.00 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon in accordance
with their terms immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger.
Accordingly, this letter shall constitute notice that all shares of Rollway
Preferred Stock shall be redeemed for the consideration described above on the
date of the closing of the Merger, if the Merger is approved and the Preferred
Terms Amendment is not approved at the Rollway Special Meeting.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY AND THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT ARE FAIR TO
THE SHAREHOLDERS AND OPTION HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A
VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL
TO ADOPT THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT.
The accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus describes the Merger Agreement
and the Preferred Terms Amendment that the holders of Rollway Common Stock and
holders of Rollway Preferred Stock are being asked to consider and vote upon at
the Rollway Special Meeting. The accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus also
constitutes a prospectus for the Emerson Common Stock to be issued in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the proposed Merger Agreement.
We urge you to carefully review and consider the accompanying Notice of Special
Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement/Prospectus and Proxy, which contain
information about Rollway and Emerson and describe the proposed Merger, the
Preferred Terms Amendment and certain related matters.
All shareholders are invited to attend the Rollway Special Meeting in
person. The affirmative vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of
the outstanding shares of Rollway Common Stock will be necessary for approval
and adoption of the Merger Agreement and the affirmative votes of the holders
of not less than a majority of the outstanding shares of the Rollway Common
Stock and of the Rollway Preferred Stock will be necessary for approval and
adoption of the Preferred Terms Amendment. Under the New York Business
Corporation Law (the "NYBCL"), any holder of Rollway Common Stock who properly
objects to the Merger and any holder of Rollway Preferred Stock who properly
objects to the Preferred Terms Amendment may assert statutory dissenters'
rights by complying with the requirements of the NYBCL. See "Dissenting
Shareholders Rights" in the accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
If the Merger Agreement is approved and the Merger is consummated, holders
of Rollway Common Stock will be sent a letter of transmittal with instructions
for surrendering their certificates representing shares of Rollway Common
Stock. If the Merger Agreement and the Preferred Terms Amendment are approved
and the Merger is consummated, the holders of Rollway Preferred Stock will also
be sent a letter of transmittal with instructions for surrendering their
certificates representing shares of Rollway Preferred Stock (letters of
transmittal will also be available at the Rollway Special Meeting). Please do
not send any share certificates until you receive these materials.
<PAGE> 7
In order that your shares may be represented at the Rollway Special
Meeting, you are urged to promptly complete, sign, date and return the
accompanying Proxy in the enclosed envelope, whether or not you plan to attend
the Rollway Special Meeting. Any shareholder returning a blank executed Proxy
will be authorizing the named proxies to vote the shares covered by the Proxy
in favor of the Merger Agreement and the Preferred Terms Amendment, as
applicable. If you attend the Rollway Special Meeting in person, you may, if
you wish, vote personally on all matters in which you are entitled to vote
which are brought before the Rollway Special Meeting even if you have
previously returned your Proxy. Your prompt cooperation will be appreciated.
Very truly yours,
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE> 8
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION
7600 Morgan Road
Liverpool, New York 13090
------------------------------
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be Held on [.........., 1996]
A Special Meeting of the Shareholders of Lipe-Rollway Corporation
("Rollway") will be held at the offices of Rollway, 7600 Morgan Road,
Liverpool, New York 13090 at 10:00 a.m., local time, on [.........., 1996] (the
"Rollway Special Meeting") for the following purposes:
1. For the holders of Rollway Common Stock to consider and vote upon
a proposal to approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
April 1, 1996 and as amended April 11, 1996 and .........., 1996 (the
"Merger Agreement"), by and among Rollway, Emerson Electric Co. ("Emerson")
and Emersub XLI, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerson ("Emersub"),
and the transactions contemplated thereby. The Merger Agreement provides
for the merger of Emersub with and into Rollway (the "Merger"), pursuant to
which Rollway will be the surviving corporation and will become a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Emerson. Upon the effectiveness of the Merger, each
outstanding share of Rollway Common Stock will be converted into the right
to receive a number of shares of Emerson Common Stock to be determined
pursuant to the provisions of the Merger Agreement. However, no fractional
shares of Emerson Common Stock will be issued, and cash will be paid in
lieu thereof. The terms of the Merger are described in the accompanying
Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The Merger Agreement is attached to the
accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Exhibit A.
2. For the holders of Rollway Common Stock and the holders of Rollway
Preferred Stock to consider and vote upon the Preferred Terms Amendment.
The full text of the Preferred Terms Amendment is provided in the
accompanying Proxy Statement/Prospectus under the heading "The Merger --
Preferred Terms Amendment." Upon the approval of the Preferred Terms
Amendment, subject to the consummation of the Merger, each outstanding
share of Rollway Preferred Stock will be converted into the right to
receive a fraction of a share of Emerson Common Stock equal in value to
$20.00 and an amount in cash equal to the amount of accrued and unpaid
dividends owed on such share of Preferred Stock at the effective time of
the Merger ($2.50 per Rollway Preferred Share as of June ....., 1996).
However, no fractional shares of Emerson Common Stock will be issued, and
cash will be paid in lieu thereof. The cash and Emerson Common Stock
payable to the holders of the Rollway Preferred Stock will not be paid out
of the Merger Consideration, but will be in addition thereto. If the
Merger is approved and approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment is not
obtained, then Rollway shall redeem all of the outstanding shares of
Rollway Preferred Stock for cash in an amount equal to $20.00 per share
plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon in accordance with their
terms immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger.
3. To transact any other business properly coming before the Rollway
Special Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
<PAGE> 9
The Board of Directors of Rollway has fixed the close of business on
[.........., 1996] as the record date for the Rollway Special Meeting to
determine the Rollway shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Rollway Special Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Please be advised that, if the Merger Agreement is approved and the Merger
is consummated, holders of Rollway Common Stock who file a written objection to
the proposed Merger before the vote on the approval of the Merger Agreement and
who do not vote to approve the Merger Agreement, will have the right to dissent
from the proposed Merger and to receive the "fair value" of their shares of
Rollway Common Stock in cash, if the Merger is consummated and they fully
comply with the procedures set forth in Section 623 of the New York Business
Corporation Law. Additionally, please be advised that if the Preferred Terms
Amendment is approved, holders of Rollway Preferred Stock who file a written
objection to the Preferred Terms Amendment before the vote of the approval of
the Preferred Terms Amendment and who do not vote in favor of the Preferred
Terms Amendment, will have the right to dissent from the Preferred Terms
Amendment and to receive the "fair value" of their shares of Rollway Preferred
Stock in cash, if the Merger is consummated and they fully comply with the
procedures set forth in Section 623 of the New York Business Corporation Law.
See "Dissenting Shareholder Rights" and Exhibit C to the accompanying Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
A form of Proxy and a Proxy Statement/Prospectus containing more detailed
information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Rollway Special
Meeting accompany this notice.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY AND THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT ARE FAIR TO
THE SHAREHOLDERS AND OPTION HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A
VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL
TO ADOPT THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT.
IN ORDER TO ASSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ROLLWAY SPECIAL MEETING,
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY, WHICH IS
BEING SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROLLWAY, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN
TO ATTEND THE ROLLWAY SPECIAL MEETING. AN ADDRESSED RETURN ENVELOPE WHICH
REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES IS ENCLOSED FOR THAT
PURPOSE. ANY SHAREHOLDER RETURNING A BLANK EXECUTED PROXY WILL BE AUTHORIZING
THE NAMED PROXIES TO VOTE THE SHARES COVERED BY THE PROXY IN FAVOR OF THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT, AS APPLICABLE. IF YOU
ATTEND THE ROLLWAY SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON AND DESIRE TO REVOKE YOUR PROXY
AND VOTE IN PERSON, YOU MAY DO SO. IN ANY EVENT, A PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY
TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED. YOUR PROMPT COOPERATION WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.
By Order of the Board of Directors
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Chairman of the Board
Liverpool, New York
[.........., 1996]
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY
<PAGE> 10
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
7600 Morgan Road 8000 West Florissant Avenue
Liverpool, New York 13090 St. Louis, Missouri 63136
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
Shares of Emerson Common Stock
$1.00 Par Value
This Proxy Statement and Prospectus (the "Proxy Statement/Prospectus") is
being furnished to the shareholders of Lipe-Rollway Corporation, a New York
corporation ("Rollway"), in connection with a special meeting of shareholders
of Rollway to be held on [.........., 1996] and any adjournment or postponement
thereof (the "Rollway Special Meeting"). The Board of Directors of Rollway has
fixed the close of business on [.........., 1996] (the "Record Date") as the
record date for the Rollway Special Meeting to determine the holders of shares
of common stock, par value $0.50 per share, of Rollway (the "Rollway Common
Stock"), and holders of shares of $1.00 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
par value $10.00, of Rollway ("Rollway Preferred Stock"), entitled to notice of
and a vote at the Rollway Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement
thereof. At the Rollway Special Meeting, holders of Rollway Common Stock will
be asked to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
April 1, 1996 and as amended April 11, 1996 and .........., 1996 (the "Merger
Agreement"), by and among Emerson Electric Co., a Missouri corporation
("Emerson"), Emersub XLI, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Emerson ("Emersub"), and Rollway. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, Emersub will be merged with and into Rollway (the "Merger").
Rollway will be the corporation surviving the Merger (the "Surviving
Corporation") and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerson as a result
of the Merger. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus as Exhibit A.
Additionally, at the Rollway Special Meeting, the holders of Rollway Common
Stock and the holders of Rollway Preferred Stock will be asked to consider and
vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment (the "Preferred Terms Amendment")
to the terms of the Rollway Preferred Stock. The full text of the Preferred
Terms Amendment is provided herein under the heading "The Merger Agreement --
Preferred Terms Amendment." It is a condition to Emerson's obligations under
the Merger Agreement that Rollway obtain the requisite shareholder approval of
the Preferred Terms Amendment or complete the redemption of the Rollway
Preferred Shares prior to the Effective Time. Therefore, if the Preferred
Terms Amendment is not appropriately approved and Rollway is unable to redeem
all of the outstanding Rollway Preferred Shares, due to an inability to raise
the funds necessary for such redemption or otherwise, the Merger may not be
consummated. See "The Merger -- Preferred Stock Treatment."
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Ann M. Hodgkins, H. Follett Hodgkins, III,
Cynthia H. Schallmo, two Trusts Under Last Will and Testament of H. Follett
Hodgkins and Trust Under Last Will and Testament of Ruth S. Hodgkins (the
"Group Shareholders"), who collectively own a majority of the outstanding
shares of Rollway Common Stock, each entered into Option Agreements dated as of
November 6, 1995, as amended on January 5, 1996, March 27, 1996 and April 11,
1996, with Emerson and Rollway (the "Option Agreements"). Pursuant to the
Option Agreements, each Group Shareholder has agreed, among other things, to
vote (at the Rollway Special Meeting) such holder's shares of Rollway Common
Stock (57.5% of the outstanding Rollway Common Stock) in favor of the Merger
and not to take any actions which would have the effect of preventing or
hindering the Merger. In addition, each Group shareholder will vote such
<PAGE> 11
holder's shares of Rollway Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock (19.5% of
the outstanding Rollway Preferred Stock) in favor of the Preferred Terms
Amendment. In addition, the Group Shareholders have agreed in the Option
Agreements to sell their shares of Rollway Common Stock and Rollway Preferred
Stock to Emerson in certain situations. See "The Merger -- Option Agreements."
At the Effective Time (as hereinafter defined) of the Merger, holders of
shares ("Rollway Common Shares") of Rollway Common Stock (including Rollway
Common Stock resulting from the exercise, immediately prior to the Merger, of
options ("Rollway Options") to purchase Rollway Common Stock) will each have
the right to receive shares ("Emerson Common Shares") of common stock, par
value $1.00 per share, of Emerson ("Emerson Common Stock"), subject to an
escrow arrangement and a holdback arrangement. See "The Merger -- Merger
Consideration," "The Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity" and "The Merger --
Holdback." Each holder of Rollway Common Shares will have the right to receive
a portion of the Merger Consideration (as hereinafter defined), payable in
Emerson Common Shares, equal in value to the Rollway Common Share Price (as
hereinafter defined) multiplied by the number of Rollway Common Shares held by
that holder. The "Rollway Common Share Price" will be based on an aggregate
purchase price for all of the Rollway Common Shares equal to approximately
$8,270,000, subject to adjustment as provided in the Merger Agreement
(collectively, the "Merger Consideration"), divided by the number of Rollway
Common Shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis at the Effective Time. For
example, if the closing of the Merger had occurred on June ....., 1996, the
Merger Consideration would have been adjusted downward by approximately
$.......... pursuant to the post-closing adjustment provisions set forth in
Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement. This would have resulted in a
Merger Consideration of approximately $.......... (or approximately $..........
per share of Rollway Common Stock), subject to the terms of the Escrow
Agreement described herein. See "The Merger -- Merger Consideration" and "The
Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity." The foregoing example is based upon Rollway's
internal, unaudited balance sheet for the fiscal month ended June ....., 1996,
which has not been subjected to a year-end accounting audit or the specific
audit provisions prescribed in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement.
Accordingly, changes in Rollway's financial condition between June ....., 1996
and the Closing Date, as well as any adjustments necessitated by the Closing
Date audit contemplated by the Merger Agreement, may have a material effect on
the amount of the Merger Consideration. See "The Merger -- Merger
Consideration."
Subject to approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment by the holders of a
majority of the Rollway Common Shares and a majority of the shares (the
"Rollway Preferred Shares") of Rollway Preferred Stock, at the Effective Time,
each holder of Rollway Preferred Shares will have the right to receive in
exchange for each Rollway Preferred Share a fraction of a share of Emerson
Common Stock equal in value to $20.00 and an amount in cash equal to the amount
of accrued and unpaid dividends owed on such share of Preferred Stock at the
effective time of the Merger ($2.50 per Rollway Preferred Share as of
June ....., 1996). The cash and Emerson Common Stock payable to the holders of
the Rollway Preferred Stock will not be paid out of the Merger Consideration,
but will be paid in addition thereto. If approval of the Preferred Terms
Amendment is not obtained and the Merger is consummated, Rollway shall redeem
all of the outstanding Rollway Preferred Shares for cash in an amount equal to
$20 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon in accordance with
their terms immediately prior to the Effective Time. See "The Merger --
Preferred Terms Amendment" and "The Merger -- Preferred Stock Treatment."
<PAGE> 12
The Committee (the "Option Committee") of the Board of Directors of Rollway
authorized to administer the Lipe-Rollway Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan
(the "Rollway Option Plan") has amended the Rollway Option Plan and each
Rollway Option to provide that all Rollway Options shall become vested
immediately prior to the Effective Time and may be exercised at such time by
the holders thereof. The holders of the Rollway Options have agreed to
exercise such options prior to the Effective Time, subject to the consummation
of the Merger. All shares of Rollway Common Stock received upon exercise of
Rollway Options prior to the Effective Time shall be converted in the Merger
into the right to receive Emerson Common Stock, as described above. See
"Information About Rollway -- Description of Rollway Options" and "The Merger -
- - The Rollway Options."
Rollway has received an opinion from Rollway's counsel that, subject to
certain assumptions, the Merger will constitute a tax-free reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").
See "The Merger -- Certain Federal Income Tax Matters." It is a condition to
Rollway's obligations under the Merger Agreement that Rollway shall not have
received any written notification from its counsel that such tax opinion has
been rescinded. If such tax opinion is rescinded, however, Emerson may employ
another law firm (reasonably acceptable to Rollway) to give such opinion and if
such other law firm, within 30 days after being employed by Emerson, gives
Rollway such tax opinion, then Rollway shall pay the fees and expenses of such
law firm in connection with such opinion and Rollway shall be deemed to have
waived this condition to its obligations. See "Certain Provisions of the
Merger Agreement -- Conditions to the Consummation of the Merger."
The Board of Directors of Rollway has retained the services of Management
Planning, Inc. ("MPI"), on the basis of its experience, to provide an opinion
concerning the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the terms of the
Merger and the consideration to be received by the holders of the Rollway
Common Stock and the Rollway Preferred Stock. Before approving the proposed
transactions, the Board of Directors of Rollway received a written opinion from
MPI that the consideration to be received by the holders of the Rollway Common
Stock and the Rollway Preferred Stock in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement is adequate and constitutes fair
consideration from a financial point of view. A copy of MPI's opinion is
attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Exhibit B and sets forth the
procedures followed, the matters considered and the limitations on the scope of
review undertaken by MPI. See "The Merger -- Fairness Opinion."
Emerson Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the
Chicago Stock Exchange under the symbol "EMR." On [.........., the closing
sale price for Emerson Common Stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange
composite tape, was [$..........] per share. This Proxy Statement/Prospectus
was first mailed to the holders of Rollway securities on or about [..........,
1996].
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus also constitutes the prospectus for the
Emerson Common Shares to be issued in the Merger. Emerson has filed a
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (together with any amendments thereto, the
"Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") of which this Proxy Statement/Prospectus is a part. All
information concerning Rollway in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus has been
furnished by Rollway, including that contained under the heading "The Merger --
Certain Federal Income Tax Matters," and all information concerning Emerson
<PAGE> 13
contained or incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus has
been furnished by Emerson.
------------------------------
THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED IN THE MERGER HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR
DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL
OFFENSE.
------------------------------
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representation not contained in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and, if given
or made, such information or representation should not be relied upon as having
been authorized. This Proxy Statement/Prospectus does not constitute the
solicitation of a proxy or an offer or solicitation to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any securities other than the shares of Emerson Common Stock
to which it relates or an offer or solicitation to any person in any
jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be unlawful. Neither
the delivery of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus nor any distribution of the
securities offered hereby shall, under any circumstances, create any
implication that there has been no change in the affairs of Emerson or Rollway
since the date hereof.
------------------------------
The date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus is [.........., 1996].
<PAGE> 14
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Emerson is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and, in accordance
therewith, files reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Commission. The reports, proxy statements and other information filed by
Emerson with the Commission may be inspected and copied at the public reference
facilities maintained by the Commission at Judiciary Plaza, Room 1024, 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and should be available at the
Commission's Regional Offices at Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New
York, New York 10048, and Northwestern Atrium Center, 500 West Madison Street,
Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661. Copies of such material also can be
obtained at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the
Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The Emerson
Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Chicago Stock
Exchange under the symbol "EMR." Copies of the reports, proxy statements and
other information filed with the Commission can also be inspected and copied at
the offices of the New York Stock Exchange at 11 Wall Street, New York, New
York 10005 and at the offices of the Chicago Stock Exchange at 440 South
LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60605.
Emerson has filed with the Commission the Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), with respect to the
securities of Emerson to be issued pursuant to the Merger. This Proxy
Statement/Prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the
Registration Statement and the exhibits thereto, certain parts of which were
omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Commission. Such
additional information may be obtained from the Commission's principal office
in Washington, D.C. Statements contained in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus or
in any document incorporated in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus by reference as
to the content of any contract or other document referred to herein or therein
are not necessarily complete, and in each instance reference is made to the
copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement or such other document, each such statement being qualified in all
respects by such reference.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents filed with the Commission by Emerson (File
No. 1-278) are incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus:
1. Emerson's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1995 (File No. 1-278).
2. Emerson's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 1995 (File No. 1-278).
3. Emerson's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 1996 (File No. 1-278).
4. The description of Emerson's Common Stock which is contained in
Emerson's Registration Statement on the Form 10 filed under the 1934
Act, as amended under cover of Form 8 on January 19, 1981, and
amendments to the Restated Articles of Incorporation described and set
forth in the Proxy Statement dated December 19, 1984 (File No. 1-278).
<PAGE> 15
5. The descriptions of Emerson's Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan
which is contained in Emerson's Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed under the 1934 Act, as amended under cover of Form 8 on
November 3, 1988 (File No. 1-278).
All documents filed by Emerson with the Commission pursuant to
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the date
hereof and prior to the Rollway Special Meeting shall hereby be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and to be part
hereof from the date of filing of such documents. See "Available Information."
Any statement contained herein or in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated herein by reference shall be deemed to be modified or superseded
for purposes of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus to the extent that a statement
contained herein or in any other subsequently filed document incorporated or
deemed to be incorporated herein by reference, which statement is also
incorporated herein by reference, modifies or supersedes such statement. Any
such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so
modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus incorporates documents by reference which
are not presented herein or delivered herewith. Copies of these documents
(excluding exhibits unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by
reference into the information incorporated herein) will be provided by first
class mail without charge to each person to whom this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus is delivered, upon written or oral request by such person
to H. M. Smith, Esq., Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary,
Emerson Electric Co., 8000 West Florissant Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri ((314)
553-2431). In order to ensure timely delivery of the documents, any request
should be made by [.........., 1996].
<PAGE> 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AVAILABLE INFORMATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Business of Emerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Business of Rollway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
The Rollway Special Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Date, Time and Place. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Record Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Votes Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Voting and Revocation of Proxies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Solicitation of Proxies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
The Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Form of the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Merger Consideration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Calculation of Rollway Common Share Price . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Emerson Share Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Holdback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Escrow and Indemnity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Common Shareholders' Representative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Preferred Terms Amendment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Preferred Stock Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Rollway Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Reasons for the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Recommendation of the Rollway Board of Directors. . . . . . . . . 25
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Fairness Opinion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Conditions to Consummation of the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Regulatory Approvals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Dissenting Shareholders' Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Accounting Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Certain Federal Income Tax Matters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Option Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Comparison of Shareholder Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
ROLLWAY SPECIAL MEETING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Purpose; Vote Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Voting and Revocation of Proxies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Solicitation of Proxies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
INFORMATION ABOUT EMERSON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Description of Emerson Capital Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Certain Effects of Authorized but Unissued Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Certain Charter and By-Law Provisions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
<PAGE> 17
INFORMATION ABOUT ROLLWAY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Rollway Bearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Lipe Automation Equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Legal Proceedings and Administrative Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Executive Officers and Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Business Experience. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Security Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Principal
Shareholders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Description of Rollway Capital Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Description of Rollway Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Director/Officer Indemnification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
1995, 1994 and 1993 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations - Three months ended March 3, 1996. . . . . . 53
THE MERGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Background of the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Emerson's Reasons for the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Rollway's Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of Rollway's Board of
Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Fairness Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Effective Time; Closing Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Form of the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Merger Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Holdback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Escrow and Indemnity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Common Shareholders' Representative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Preferred Terms Amendment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Preferred Stock Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
The Rollway Options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Option Agreements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Non-Competition and Employment Agreements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Certain Federal Income Tax Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Accounting Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Regulatory Approvals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Exchange Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Representations and Warranties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Certain Other Covenants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
No Solicitation of Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Conditions to the Consummation of the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
Termination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Election of Directors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Removal of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Indemnification and Limitation of Liability of Directors and Officers. . 91
Shareholder Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Inspection Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Action by Consent of Shareholders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
<PAGE> 18
Dividends and Repurchases of Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Amendments to Charter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Amendments to By-Laws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Preemptive Rights of Shareholders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Control Share Acquisition Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Takeover Bid Disclosure Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Business Combinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Sale, Lease or Exchange of Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Rollway Preferred Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Preferred Share Purchase Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Rights of Dissenting Shareholders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
LEGAL MATTERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
EXPERTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
EXHIBIT A - AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
EXHIBIT B - FAIRNESS OPINION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
EXHIBIT C - NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW SECTIONS 623, 806(b)(6) AND
910. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
<PAGE> 19
SUMMARY
The following is a summary of certain information contained elsewhere in
this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the Exhibits hereto, which are incorporated
herein by reference, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the more
detailed information included in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Exhibits hereto, including, but not limited to, the Merger Agreement set forth
as Exhibit A hereto. Shareholders and option holders are urged to read
carefully this Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the Exhibits hereto in their
entirety.
Business of Emerson Emerson was incorporated in Missouri in 1890.
Originally engaged in the manufacture and sale of
electric motors and fans, Emerson's product lines were
subsequently expanded through internal growth and
acquisitions. Emerson is now engaged principally in
the design, manufacture and sale of a broad range of
electrical, electromechanical and electronic products
and systems. The mailing address of Emerson's
principal executive offices is 8000 West Florissant
Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63136, telephone number
(314) 553-2000. See "Information About Emerson."
Business of Rollway Rollway was incorporated in New York in 1924. Rollway
currently has two principal lines of business. Its
bearing operations provide high quality, high
performance and precision bearings for a number of
industries including aerospace, mining, agriculture,
construction and precision manufacturing. Rollway's
automation equipment operations manufacture and sell
beltless, vibratory, positioning, feeding and conveyor
systems for the machine tool industry. The mailing
address of Rollway's principal executive offices is
7600 Morgan Road, Liverpool, New York 13090, telephone
number (315) 457-6211. See "Information About
Rollway."
The Rollway Special Meeting
General The purpose of the Rollway Special Meeting is to
consider and vote upon the approval of the Merger and
the Preferred Terms Amendment and to consider such
other business as may be properly introduced.
Date, Time and Place The Rollway Special Meeting will be held at 7600
Morgan Road, Liverpool, New York 13090 at 10:00 a.m.,
local time on [.........., 1996].
Record Date The Board of Directors of Rollway has set [..........,
1996] as the Record Date for determining those
shareholders of Rollway that will be entitled to vote
at the Rollway Special Meeting.
Votes Required The affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-
thirds of the outstanding Rollway Common Shares (i.e.,
at least .......... shares as of .........., 1996) is
required to approve the Merger. The affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the Rollway Common
Shares (i.e., at least .......... shares as of
<PAGE> 20
.........., 1996) and a majority of the Rollway
Preferred Shares (i.e., at least .......... shares as
of .........., 1996) is required to approve the
Preferred Terms Amendment. As of .........., 1996,
directors and executive officers of Rollway and their
affiliates held in the aggregate .......... Rollway
Common Shares (..........% of outstanding Rollway
Common Shares) and .......... Rollway Preferred Shares
(..........% of Rollway Preferred Shares). The Group
Shareholders have agreed to vote their shares of
Rollway Common Stock (57.5% of the outstanding Rollway
Common Stock) and their shares of Rollway Preferred
Stock (19.5% of the outstanding Rollway Preferred
Stock) in favor of the Merger and the Preferred Terms
Amendment.
Voting and Revocation
of Proxies Each holder of Rollway Common Shares and Rollway
Preferred Shares as of the Record Date will be
entitled to vote at the Rollway Special Meeting. Only
the holders of Rollway Common Shares shall be entitled
to vote on the Merger. Holders of Rollway Common
Shares and holders of Rollway Preferred Shares shall
be entitled to vote on the Preferred Terms Amendment.
Votes may be cast either in person or by proxy.
Unless a contrary indication is included therein, all
proxies will be voted in favor of the Merger and the
Preferred Terms Amendment, as applicable. At any time
before they are voted proxies may be revoked by (i)
the holder attending the Rollway Special Meeting and
voting thereat in person, (ii) the due execution of a
later dated proxy, or (iii) the due execution and
delivery of a notice of revocation to the Secretary of
Rollway. See "Rollway Special Meeting -- Voting and
Revocation of Proxies."
Solicitation of
Proxies This Proxy Statement/Prospectus is being furnished in
connection with the solicitation on behalf of the
Board of Directors of Rollway of proxies for use at
the Rollway Special Meeting.
The Merger
Form of the Merger If (i) the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby are approved by holders of at
least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Rollway
Common Stock and (ii) all other conditions to the
Merger are satisfied or waived, Emersub will be merged
with and into Rollway, with Rollway as the Surviving
Corporation, which will thereupon become a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Emerson.
Merger Consideration At the Effective Time of the Merger, pursuant to the
Merger, holders of Rollway Common Shares will have the
right to receive Emerson Common Shares, subject to an
escrow arrangement (see "-- Escrow and Indemnity"
below) and a holdback arrangement (see "--Holdback"
<PAGE> 21
below). Each holder of Rollway Common Shares will
have the right to receive a portion of the Merger
Consideration, payable in Emerson Common Shares valued
at the Emerson Share Value (as hereinafter defined),
equal to the Rollway Common Share Price multiplied by
the number of Rollway Common Shares held by such
holder. Emerson shall aggregate the Emerson Common
Stock issuable to any person, and since fractional
shares will not be issued, such person shall receive
cash in lieu of fractional shares remaining following
such aggregation. See "The Merger -- Merger
Consideration."
Calculation of Rollway
Common Share Price The "Rollway Common Share Price" will be based on an
aggregate purchase price for all of the Rollway Common
Shares equal to approximately $8,270,000, subject to
adjustment as provided in the Merger Agreement
(collectively, the "Merger Consideration"), divided by
the number of Rollway Common Shares outstanding at the
Effective Time. For example, if the closing of the
Merger had occurred on June ....., 1996, the Merger
Consideration would have been adjusted downward by
approximately $.......... pursuant to the post-closing
adjustment provisions set forth in Sections 1.9 and
1.10 of the Merger Agreement. This would have
resulted in a Merger Consideration of approximately
$.......... (or approximately $.......... per share of
Rollway Common Stock, assuming .......... shares of
Rollway Common Stock outstanding), subject to the
terms of the Escrow Agreement described herein. See
"The Merger -- Merger Consideration" and "The Merger -
- Escrow and Indemnity." The foregoing example is
based upon Rollway's internal, unaudited balance sheet
for the fiscal month ended June ....., 1996, which has
not been subjected to a year-end accounting audit or
the specific audit provisions prescribed in Sections
1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement. Accordingly,
changes in Rollway's financial condition between
June ....., 1996 and the Closing Date, as well as any
adjustments necessitated by the Closing Date audit
contemplated by the Merger Agreement, may have a
material effect on the amount of the Merger
Consideration. See "The Merger--Merger
Consideration."
Emerson Share Value The "Emerson Share Value" will equal the average
closing price of an Emerson Common Share for the five
consecutive trading days ending on .........., 1996,
which is five days prior to the Rollway Special
Meeting, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, New
York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions.
Holdback Emerson Common Shares valued at the Emerson Share
Value worth $1,000,000 (the "Holdback") will be
withheld from the initial distribution of the Merger
Consideration as security for the possible adjustments
to the Merger Consideration described under "The
Merger--Holdback."
<PAGE> 22
Escrow and Indemnity Emerson Common Shares valued at the Emerson Share
Value worth $2,600,000 (the "Escrow Deposit") will be
held in escrow under the Escrow Agreement to be
executed in connection with the closing of the Merger
(Exhibit 1.13 to the Merger Agreement attached hereto
as Exhibit A, the "Escrow Agreement"). A portion of
the Escrow Deposit equal at the closing date to
$2,500,000 and all income thereon (collectively, the
"Indemnity Escrow Funds") will be held for 18 months
from the Closing Date (except as described below) as
security to compensate Emerson and the Surviving
Corporation (i) for any losses they suffer as a result
of the breach of any of Rollway's representations,
warranties or covenants in the Merger Agreement,
(ii) as a result of the assertion against Emerson or
the Surviving Corporation of certain tax liabilities,
(iii) arising out of Rollway's agreement to indemnify
MPI, (iv) arising out of the commission payment
practices of Lipe Rollway, N.V., Rollway's Belgian
subsidiary ("LRNV"), or (v) arising out of certain
legal proceedings pending against Rollway. See "The
Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity." Of this amount,
$1,000,000 and any income thereon (less any amounts
distributed to Emerson for claims relating to LRNV's
commission payment practices) will be released from
escrow on January 3, 1997, unless prior to January 1,
1997 Emerson has reasonably reliable evidence that
events have occurred which would justify an extension
to 5 years of the statute of limitations applicable to
any reporting or payment requirements applicable to
the commission payment practices of LRNV. In such an
event, the remaining portion of the $1,000,000 as of
January 3, 1997 and any income thereon will continue
to be held in escrow until January 4, 1999. The
balance of the Escrow Deposit ($100,000), and all
income earned thereon (collectively, the
"Representative Escrow Funds"), will be held to pay
the reasonable fees and expenses of the Common
Shareholders' Representative (described below)
incurred in resolving any dispute relating to any
claims for such losses. See "Certain Provisions of
the Merger Agreement -- Representations and
Warranties" and "The Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity."
BY SUBMITTING CERTIFICATES FORMERLY REPRESENTING
ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK, EACH SUBMITTING COMMON
SHAREHOLDER WILL HAVE AGREED TO PERSONALLY INDEMNIFY
EMERSON, THE SURVIVING CORPORATION AND THEIR
AFFILIATES ON DEMAND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LOSSES TO THE
EXTENT ESCROW FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE THEREFOR, EITHER
BECAUSE THE ESCROW FUNDS HAVE BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO
EMERSON DUE TO THE BREACH OF ANY OF ROLLWAY'S
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES OR COVENANTS IN THE MERGER
AGREEMENT OR THE ESCROW AGREEMENT HAS TERMINATED.
SUCH PERSONAL INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE
SEVERAL AND ONLY IN PROPORTION TO, AND SHALL BE
LIMITED TO, EACH COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S PORTION OF THE
MERGER CONSIDERATION. SUCH COMMON SHAREHOLDERS SHALL
<PAGE> 23
ALSO BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ANY RIGHT OF
CONTRIBUTION OR OTHER SIMILAR RIGHT AGAINST THE
SURVIVING CORPORATION ARISING OUT OF ROLLWAY'S
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND SHALL BE DEEMED
TO HAVE AGREED TO ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE MERGER
AGREEMENT SPECIFICALLY STATED THEREIN TO BE AN
OBLIGATION OR AGREEMENT OF SUCH COMMON SHAREHOLDERS.
See "The Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity."
Common Shareholders'
Representative By submitting certificates formerly representing
Rollway Common Stock, each submitting shareholder will
have agreed to the appointment of Henry Fust, a C.P.A.
in Syracuse, New York, as the Common Shareholders'
Representative. The Merger Agreement provides that,
upon its approval and consummation, the former holders
of the Rollway Common Stock will have waived any right
or cause of action for any action taken or omitted
from being taken by the Common Shareholders'
Representative. See "The Merger -- Common
Shareholders' Representative."
Preferred Terms
Amendment At the Rollway Special Meeting, the holders of Rollway
Common Stock and the holders of Rollway Preferred
Stock will be asked to approve the Preferred Terms
Amendment. If approved, this amendment to Rollway's
Certificate of Incorporation would provide that, upon
the consummation of the Merger, each share of Rollway
Preferred Stock would be converted into the right to
receive a fraction of a share of Emerson Common Stock,
as described below under "-- Preferred Stock
Treatment." The text of the Preferred Terms Amendment
is set forth herein under the heading "The Merger --
Preferred Terms Amendment." The approval of the
holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding
Rollway Common Stock and the holders of a majority of
the issued and outstanding Rollway Preferred Stock is
required to approve the Preferred Terms Amendment. It
is a condition to Emerson's obligations under the
Merger Agreement that Rollway shall have either (i)
obtained appropriate shareholder approval of the
Preferred Terms Amendment prior to the Effective Time
or (ii) completed the redemption of all Rollway
Preferred Shares prior to the Effective Time.
Therefore, if the Preferred Terms Amendment is not
appropriately approved and Rollway is unable to redeem
all of the outstanding Rollway Preferred Shares, due
to an inability to raise the funds necessary for such
redemption or otherwise, the Merger may not be
consummated.
Preferred Stock
Treatment Subject to approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment,
at the Effective Time each holder of Rollway Preferred
Shares will have the right to receive in exchange for
each Rollway Preferred Share a fraction of a share of
Emerson Common Stock equal in value to $20.00 and an
<PAGE> 24
amount in cash equal to the amount of accrued and
unpaid dividends owed on such Rollway Preferred Share
at the Effective Time ($2.50 per Rollway Preferred
Share as of June ....., 1996). Emerson shall
aggregate the Emerson Common Stock issuable to any
person, and, since fractional shares will not be
issued, such person shall receive cash in lieu of any
fractional shares remaining following such
aggregation. The cash and Emerson Common Stock
payable to the holders of the Rollway Preferred Stock
will not be paid out of the Merger Consideration, but
will be in addition thereto. If approval of the
Preferred Terms Amendment is not obtained and the
Merger is consummated, Rollway will redeem all of the
outstanding shares of Rollway Preferred Stock for
$20.00 per share in cash plus accrued and unpaid
dividends in accordance with their terms immediately
prior to the Effective Time. See "The Merger --
Preferred Stock Treatment."
Rollway Options The Option Committee of the Board of Directors of
Rollway authorized to administer the Rollway Option
Plan has amended the Rollway Option Plan and each
Rollway Option to provide that all Rollway Options
shall become vested immediately prior to the Effective
Time and may be exercised at such time by the holders
thereof. The holders of the Rollway Options have
agreed to exercise such options prior to the Effective
Time, subject to the consummation of the Merger. All
shares of Rollway Common Stock received upon exercise
of Rollway Options prior to the Effective Time shall
be converted in the Merger into the right to receive
Emerson Common Stock, as described above. It is a
condition to Emerson's obligations under the Merger
Agreement that all Rollway Options be exercised prior
to the Effective Time. See "Information About Rollway
-- Description of Rollway Options" and "The Merger --
The Rollway Options."
Reasons for the
Merger Emerson's Reasons. Many factors were taken into
consideration by Emerson in entering into the Merger
Agreement, including the acquisition of Rollway's
cylindrical and thrust bearing products, the
prospects, assets, obligations and potential earnings
of Rollway, the synergism which should result from the
combination of Rollway with Emerson Power Transmission
(an Emerson subsidiary) and the ability of Emerson to
provide Rollway with a much stronger sales and
marketing organization. See "The Merger -- Emerson's
Reasons for the Merger."
Rollway's Reasons. The Rollway Board of Directors
considered a number of factors in determining to enter
into the Merger Agreement, including the operating
history and future prospects of Rollway, its dividend
paying history, the need for shareholder liquidity,
the consideration to be received by Rollway's
shareholders if the transactions contemplated by the
<PAGE> 25
Merger Agreement are consummated and the prospects of
Emerson being the best viable alternative.
Recommendation of
the Rollway
Board of Directors THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROLLWAY HAS UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED THEREBY AND THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT
AS BEING FAIR AND IN THE BEST INTEREST OF ROLLWAY, ITS
SHAREHOLDERS AND THE HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY OPTIONS. THE
ROLLWAY BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT
HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK APPROVE THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY
AND THAT HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK AND HOLDERS
OF ROLLWAY PREFERRED STOCK APPROVE THE PREFERRED TERMS
AMENDMENT.
Interests of Certain
Persons in the
Merger At the Effective Time, Emerson and H. Follett
Hodgkins, Jr. will enter into a non-competition
agreement pursuant to which Mr. Hodgkins will agree
not to compete with Rollway for a period of five years
and to maintain certain information in confidence. In
consideration therefor, Mr. Hodgkins will be entitled
to receive $100,000 per year during the non-compete
period, $10,000 per year for life and certain other
benefits such as health insurance and life insurance.
Also at the Effective Time, Emerson expects to enter
into employment agreements with Edmund Babiarz,
Stephen Bregande and Karl Loessner, each of whom is an
officer and/or director of Rollway. See "The Merger -
- Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
Fairness Opinion The Board of Directors of Rollway has retained the
services of MPI, on the basis of its experience, to
provide an opinion concerning the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the terms of the Merger
and the consideration to be received by the holders of
the Rollway Common Stock and the Rollway Preferred
Stock. Before approving the proposed transactions,
the Board of Directors of Rollway received a written
opinion from MPI that the consideration to be received
by the holders of the Rollway Common Stock and the
Rollway Preferred Stock in connection with the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is
adequate and constitutes fair consideration from a
financial point of view. A copy of MPI's opinion is
attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as
Exhibit B and sets forth the procedures followed, the
matters considered and the limitations on the scope of
review undertaken by MPI. See "The Merger -- Fairness
Opinion."
Conditions to
Consummation
of the Merger The respective obligations of Emerson and Rollway to
consummate the Merger are each subject to various
conditions, including, without limitation,
<PAGE> 26
(i) obtaining the approval of the Merger Agreement by
the holders of not less than two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of Rollway Common Stock and (ii)
obtaining the approval of the Preferred Terms
Amendment or completion of the redemption of the
Rollway Preferred Shares prior to the Effective Time.
See "Certain Provisions of the Merger Agreement --
Conditions to the Consummation of the Merger."
Termination The Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby may be terminated prior to the Closing Date
only as follows: (a) by the mutual written consent of
the Boards of Directors of Rollway and Emerson; or
(b) by either Rollway or Emerson in the event the
Merger has not been consummated on or before
October 8, 1996, unless the failure to consummate the
Merger is a result of the breach of or default under
the Merger Agreement by such party. See "Certain
Provisions of the Merger Agreement -- Termination."
Regulatory Approvals Consummation of the Merger requires notifications to,
and/or approvals from, certain governmental
authorities, all which have been obtained. See "The
Merger -- Regulatory Approvals."
Dissenting
Shareholders'
Rights Under the New York Business Corporation Law (the
"NYBCL"), any holder of Rollway Common Stock who
properly objects to the Merger and any holder of
Rollway Preferred Stock who properly objects to the
Preferred Terms Amendment may assert statutory
dissenters' rights by complying with the requirements
of the NYBCL. See "Dissenting Shareholders Rights."
It is a condition to the consummation of the Merger
that (i) holders of not more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of Rollway Common Stock shall have
exercised dissenting shareholder rights with respect
to the Merger and (ii) holders of not more than 5% of
the outstanding shares of Rollway Preferred Stock
shall have exercised dissenting shareholder rights
with respect to the Preferred Terms Amendment.
Accounting Treatment The Merger will be accounted for by Emerson as a
"purchase," as such term is used under generally
accepted accounting principles, for accounting and
financial reporting purposes. See "The Merger --
Accounting Treatment."
Certain Federal
Income Tax Matters Rollway has received an opinion from Rollway's counsel
that, subject to certain assumptions, the Merger will
constitute a tax-free reorganization under Section
368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"). Based on such opinion, no gain
or loss will be recognized by the holders of Rollway
Common Stock (and Rollway Preferred Stock, if the
Preferred Terms Amendment is approved) upon receipt of
Emerson Common Stock solely in exchange for such
<PAGE> 27
Rollway Common Stock (or Rollway Preferred Stock) in
the Merger (except to the extent of cash received in
lieu of fractional shares, in payment of accrued and
unpaid dividends or as a result of exercising
dissenters' rights). See "The Merger -- Certain
Federal Income Tax Matters."
It is a condition to Rollway's obligations under the
Merger Agreement that Rollway shall not have received
any written notification from its counsel that its tax
opinion has been rescinded. If such tax opinion is
rescinded, however, Emerson may employ another law
firm (reasonably acceptable to Rollway) to give such
opinion and if such other law firm, within 30 days
after being employed by Emerson, gives Rollway such
tax opinion, then Rollway shall pay the fees and
expenses of such law firm in connection with such
opinion and Rollway shall be deemed to have waived
this condition to its obligations. See "Certain
Provisions of the Merger Agreement -- Conditions to
the Consummation of the Merger."
Option Agreements H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Ann M. Hodgkins, H. Follett
Hodgkins, III, Cynthia H. Schallmo, two Trusts Under
Last Will and Testament of H. Follett Hodgkins and
Trust Under Last Will and Testament of Ruth S.
Hodgkins (as previously defined, the "Group
Shareholders"), who collectively own a majority of the
outstanding Rollway Common Stock, each entered into an
Option Agreement dated as of November 6, 1995, as
amended on January 5, 1996, March 27, 1996 and
April 11, 1996, with Emerson and Rollway. Pursuant to
the Option Agreements, each of the Group Shareholders
has agreed, among other things, to vote (at the
Rollway Special Meeting) such holder's shares of
Rollway Common Stock (57.5% of the outstanding Rollway
Common Stock) in favor of the Merger and not to take
any actions which would have the effect of preventing
or hindering the Merger. In addition, each Group
Shareholder will vote such holder's shares of Rollway
Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock (19.5% of the
outstanding Rollway Preferred Stock) in favor of the
Preferred Terms Amendment. In addition, the Group
Shareholders have agreed in the Option Agreements to
sell their shares of Rollway Common Stock and Rollway
Preferred Stock to Emerson in certain situations. See
"The Merger -- Option Agreements."
Expenses Each party to the Merger Agreement has agreed that it
shall be responsible for its own fees and expenses
relating to the Merger Agreement and the consummation
of the transactions contemplated therein; provided,
however, that Rollway has agreed to pay the fees and
expenses of the Group Shareholders relating to the
negotiation and execution of the Option Agreements.
See "Certain Provisions of the Merger Agreement --
Expenses." The payment of these fees and expenses
will likely decrease the Merger Consideration. See
"The Merger -- Merger Consideration."
<PAGE> 28
Comparison of
Shareholder Rights See "Comparative Rights of Shareholders" for a summary
of certain differences between the rights of holders
of Emerson Common Stock and Rollway Common Stock and
Rollway Preferred Stock.
<PAGE> 29
COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Emerson Electric Co.
Emerson Common Stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange
and Chicago Stock Exchange under the symbol "EMR." The following table sets
forth the range of sale prices of Emerson Common Stock as reported on the New
York Stock Exchange composite tape and the per share quarterly dividends
declared during the periods indicated.
EMERSON COMMON STOCK
High Low Dividend
---------- ---------- ----------
Fiscal 1994
- -----------
Quarter Ended 12/31. . . . . . . . . . . $61 $55 3/8 $0.39
Quarter Ended 3/31 . . . . . . . . . . . 65 7/8 57 7/8 0.39
Quarter Ended 6/30 . . . . . . . . . . . 61 1/8 56 1/8 0.39
Quarter Ended 9/30 . . . . . . . . . . . 64 57 0.39
Fiscal 1995
- -----------
Quarter Ended 12/31. . . . . . . . . . . 64 1/4 57 1/4 0.43
Quarter Ended 3/31 . . . . . . . . . . . 67 1/8 61 1/2 0.43
Quarter Ended 6/30 . . . . . . . . . . . 72 64 1/8 0.43
Quarter Ended 9/30 . . . . . . . . . . . 75 3/8 69 3/4 0.49
Fiscal 1996
- -----------
Quarter Ended 12/31. . . . . . . . . . . 81 3/4 69 1/4 0.49
Quarter Ended 3/31 . . . . . . . . . . . 86 3/4 77 3/4 0.49
Quarter Ended 6/30 (through ..........). ...... ...... .....
On [.........., 1996], the closing sale price for Emerson Common Stock on
the New York Stock Exchange composite tape was $[..........] per share. As of
September 30, 1995, the number of holders of record of Emerson Common Stock was
approximately 31,000.
Lipe-Rollway Corporation
The Rollway Common Stock is not now nor has it been in recent years
admitted to trading on any national stock exchange or quotation system. During
the past several years trading in Rollway Common Shares has been extremely
limited. Based on the information available to Rollway, Rollway Common Shares
have traded in brokered and other private transactions at prices ranging
between $1.00 and $12.00 during the period January 13, 1995 through
February 29, 1996.
Rollway has never declared or paid a cash dividend with respect to Rollway
Common Shares. No dividends have been declared or paid on the Rollway
Preferred Shares since the fourth quarter of 1993. As of June ....., 1996,
Rollway had dividends in arrears of $234,230 on its Rollway Preferred Shares
representing two and one-half years of unpaid dividends.
<PAGE> 30
As of [.........., 1996], there were .......... record holders of Rollway
Common Stock and .......... record holders of Rollway Preferred Stock.
Holders of Rollway securities are urged to obtain current market quotations
for Emerson Common Stock. No assurance can be given as to the Emerson Share
Value or as to the market price of Emerson Common Stock at the Effective Time
of the Merger or thereafter.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table sets forth earnings, dividends and book values per
share of Emerson Common Stock and Rollway Common Stock on a historical basis
and on an equivalent basis for Rollway. The equivalent information presented
is based on an assumed exchange ratio ("Assumed Common Exchange Ratio") of
.......... of a share of Emerson Common Stock for each share of Rollway Common
Stock. The actual Common Exchange Ratio will be based on the Merger
Consideration, which is approximately $8,270,000, subject to adjustment as
provided in the Merger Agreement. For example, if the closing of the Merger
had occurred on June ....., 1996, the Merger Consideration would have been
adjusted downward by approximately $.......... pursuant to the closing net
worth provisions set forth in Section 1.9 of the Merger Agreement and would
have been adjusted upward by approximately $.......... pursuant to the closing
pension liability provisions set forth in Section 1.10 of the Merger Agreement.
This would have resulted in a Merger Consideration of approximately $..........
(or approximately $.......... per share of Rollway Common Stock, assuming
.......... shares of Rollway Common Stock outstanding), subject to the terms of
the Escrow Agreement described herein. See "The Merger -- Merger
Consideration" and "The Merger -- Escrow and Indemnity." The foregoing example
is based upon Rollway's internal, unaudited balance sheet for the fiscal month
ended June ....., 1996, which has not been subjected to a year-end accounting
audit or the specific audit provisions prescribed in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of
the Merger Agreement. Accordingly, changes in Rollway's financial condition
between June ....., 1996 and the Closing Date, as well as any adjustments
necessitated by the Closing Date audit contemplated by the Merger Agreement,
may have a material effect on the amount of the Merger Consideration. The
Assumed Common Exchange Ratio was calculated based on: (a) the foregoing
example of the Merger Consideration as of June ....., 1996 (i.e., $..........)
and (b) an assumed Emerson Share Value of $.......... (the closing price of
Emerson Common Stock on .........., 1996). No assurance can be given that the
Assumed Common Exchange Ratio will approximate the actual exchange ratio. The
actual exchange ratio will be based on the Emerson Share Value, which will not
be determined until the end of .........., 1996, which is five days prior to
the Rollway Special Meeting, and the Rollway Common Share Price, which will not
finally be determined until immediately after the approval of the Closing
Balance Sheet (as hereinafter defined). See "The Merger--Merger
Consideration." Pro forma combined information is not required to be presented
as it would not have been materially different from Emerson historical
information. The table should be read in conjunction with the selected
financial data and respective consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto of Emerson and Rollway included elsewhere or incorporated by reference
in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
<PAGE> 31
Proforma
Equivalent
of One
Emerson Rollway Rollway
Common Share Common Share Common
Historical Historical Share(2)
------------ ------------- ------------
Most Recent Fiscal Year (1):
Net Earnings $ 4.06 $ .81 $.....
Cash Dividends 1.78 -- .....
Book Value at Fiscal Year End 21.75 8.24 .....
Proforma
Equivalent
of One
Emerson Rollway Rollway
Common Share Common Share Common
Historical Historical(3) Share(2)
------------ ------------- ------------
Six Months Ended March 31, 1996:
Net Earnings (Loss) $ 2.17 ($0.18) $.....
Cash Dividends .98 -- .....
Book Value at End of Period 22.73 9.40 .....
- ---------------
(1) Information presented for Emerson fiscal year ended September 30, 1995 and
Rollway fiscal year ended December 3, 1995.
(2) Based on an Assumed Common Exchange Ratio of .........., which was
calculated as if the Closing had occurred on June ....., 1996 (as described
above), without giving effect to any possible post-closing Merger
Consideration adjustments, and using an assumed Emerson Share Value of
$...........
(3) Information presented for Rollway six month period ended March 3, 1996.
Rollway Common Share historical net earnings and book value was $1.03 and
$9.06, respectively, for the three month period ended March 3, 1996.
<PAGE> 32
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below are selected historical financial data of Emerson and
Rollway. This information is based upon and should be read in conjunction with
the other financial information of Emerson and Rollway presented or
incorporated by reference elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
<TABLE>
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
<CAPTION>
Six
Months Ended
March 31, Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
---------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings Statement Data:
Net sales 5,385.6 4,798.7 10,012.9 8,607.2 8,173.8 7,706.0 7,427.0
Net earnings 485.4 430.5 907.7 788.5 708.1 662.9 631.9
Per Share of Emerson
common stock:
Net earnings 2.17 1.93 4.06 3.52 3.15 2.96 2.83
Cash dividends .98 .86 1.78 1.56 1.44 1.38 1.32
Balance Sheet Data
(At End of Period)
Total assets 10,376.8 9,423.3 9,399.0 8,215.0 7,814.5 6,627.0 6,364.4
Long-term debt 816.1 330.4 208.6 279.9 438.0 448.0 450.2
</TABLE>
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting for
postemployment benefits ($21.3 million; $.10 per share) was $451.8
million in the six months ended March 31, 1995 and $929.0 million in
fiscal 1995, respectively. Net earnings in the six months ended
March 31, 1995 includes non-recurring items which were substantially
offset by the accounting change.
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting for
postretirement benefits ($115.9 million; $.52 per share) was $904.4
million in fiscal 1994. Net earnings in fiscal 1994 includes non-
recurring items which were substantially offset by the accounting
change. See Notes 2 and 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K for information
regarding these items and Emerson's acquisition and divestiture
activities.
<PAGE> 33
<TABLE>
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Data)
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Fiscal Year Ended
---------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 3, Feb. 28, Dec. 3, Nov. 27, Nov. 28, Nov. 29, Dec. 1,
1996 1995 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings Statement Data:
Net sales $ 12,105 $ 9,884 $ 46,493 $ 32,904 $ 32,453 $ 32,700 $ 35,639
Net earnings (loss) 733 336 707<F1> 102 (146) (1,167) (926)
Net earnings (loss
per common share
outstanding)<F2> 0.94 0.42 0.81 0.01 (0.32) (1.69) (1.37)
Weighted Average
Number of Shares 752,628 752,628 752,628 752,628 752,628 752,628 752,628
Balance Sheet Data
(At End of Period)
Total assets 36,064 30,033 34,155 27,762 22,521 22,695 25,485
Long-term debt and
redeemable preferred
stock 6,580 10,900 6,767 10,165 3,768 4,682 2,780
- ---------------
<FN>
<F1> After deduction of one time administrative expenses totaling $1,488,108. See "Information About Rollway --
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
<F2> Net earnings (loss) per common share outstanding are after unpaid dividends on cumulative preferred stock.
No dividends have ever been declared or paid on the Rollway Common Shares.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 34
ROLLWAY SPECIAL MEETING
General
This Proxy Statement and Prospectus is being furnished to Rollway
Shareholders for use at the Rollway Special Meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on
[.........., 1996], at Rollway's offices, 7600 Morgan Road, Liverpool, New York
13088.
At the close of business on [.........., 1996], the Record Date for the
determination of the Rollway shareholders entitled to vote at the Rollway
Special Meeting, there were 1,500,000 authorized shares of Rollway Common Stock
of which 752,628 shares were issued and outstanding, as well as options to
purchase 66,666 shares of Rollway Common Stock, and 250,000 authorized shares
of Rollway Preferred Stock of which 93,692 shares were issued and outstanding.
Each share of Rollway Common Stock and each share of Rollway Preferred Stock
shall be entitled to one vote on the respective matters set forth below.
Purpose; Vote Required
The purpose of the Rollway Special Meeting is to vote on the approval of
the Merger and the Preferred Stock Amendment. Only the holders of Rollway
Common Stock shall be entitled to vote on the approval of the Merger at the
Rollway Special Meeting. Holders of Rollway Common Stock and holders of
Rollway Preferred Stock shall be entitled to vote on the approval of the
Preferred Terms Amendment.
Pursuant to Rollway's By-Laws, a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of Rollway Common Stock and a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of Rollway Preferred Stock must each be represented, either in person or
by proxy, in order to constitute a quorum at the Rollway Special Meeting. Each
properly executed proxy received by Rollway will be treated as present at the
Rollway Special Meeting for purposes of determining the required quorum
regardless of whether the proxy votes for, against, abstains or contains no
voting indication with respect to the matters to be voted upon.
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of the Rollway Common Stock is required to approve the
Merger. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the
Rollway Common Stock outstanding and the holders of a majority of the shares of
the Rollway Preferred Stock outstanding is required to approve the Preferred
Terms Amendment.
Pursuant to certain Option Agreements dated November 6, 1995, as amended on
January 5, 1996, March 27, 1996 and April 11, 1996, the Group Shareholders have
agreed to vote in favor of the Merger. These shareholders include H. Follett
Hodgkins, Jr., Cynthia Hodgkins Schallmo, Ann M. Hodgkins, H. Follett Hodgkins,
III, Key Trust Company and H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr. as Co-Trustees U/W Ruth S.
Hodgkins and Key Trust Company and H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr. as Co-Trustees U/W
H. Follett Hodgkins. Collectively, these individuals and entities have the
right to vote 57.5% of the issued and outstanding Rollway Common Stock entitled
to vote on the Merger. In addition, these individuals and entities will vote
their shares of Rollway Common Stock (57.5%) and Rollway Preferred Stock
(19.5%) in favor of the Preferred Terms Amendment.
<PAGE> 35
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
All shares of Rollway Stock (Common or Preferred) that are represented by a
properly executed proxy and received prior to the vote at the Rollway Special
Meeting will be voted at such meeting in the manner directed on the proxy
unless such proxy is revoked in advance of such vote. All proxies will be
voted in accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. If no direction
is indicated on the proxy, the proxy will be voted in favor of the Merger
and/or the Preferred Terms Amendment, as applicable.
At any time before it is voted, any proxy given by a holder of Rollway
Stock may be revoked by (i) the holder attending the Rollway Special Meeting
and voting in person, (ii) the due execution and delivery of a later dated
proxy, or (iii) the due execution and delivery of a written notice of
revocation to Donald M. Mawhinney, Jr., Secretary, Lipe-Rollway Corporation,
7600 Morgan Road, Liverpool, New York 13090. Attendance at the Rollway Special
Meeting will not in itself constitute the revocation of a proxy.
Solicitation of Proxies
This Proxy Statement/Prospectus is being furnished in connection with the
solicitation on behalf of the Board of Directors of Rollway of proxies for use
at the Rollway Special Meeting. The costs of solicitation will be borne by
Rollway. In addition to the use of mails, some of the officers, directors and
regular employees of Rollway may solicit proxies in person and by telephone and
may solicit brokers and other persons holding shares beneficially owned by
others to procure from the beneficial owners consents to the execution of
proxies. Rollway will reimburse such brokers and other persons for their
expenses incurred in sending proxy forms and other materials to their
principals.
INFORMATION ABOUT EMERSON
Business
Emerson was incorporated in Missouri in 1890. Originally engaged in the
manufacture and sale of electric motors and fans, Emerson's product lines were
subsequently expanded through internal growth and acquisitions. Emerson is now
engaged principally in the design, manufacture and sale of a broad range of
electrical, electromechanical and electronic products and systems.
The products manufactured by Emerson are classified into the following
industry segments: Commercial and Industrial Components and Systems; and
Appliance and Construction-Related Components. Net sales, income before income
taxes and accounting changes and total assets attributable to each industry
segment for the three years ended September 30, 1995 are set forth in Note 12
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 39 of Emerson's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995 (the "1995
Annual Report"), which note is hereby incorporated by reference. Information
with respect to acquisition and divestiture activities by Emerson is set forth
in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 33 of the 1995
Annual Report, which note is hereby incorporated by reference.
<PAGE> 36
Commercial and Industrial Components and Systems
The Commercial and Industrial segment includes process control
instrumentation, valves and systems; industrial motors and drives; industrial
machinery, equipment and components; and electronic products. These products
are generally highly engineered, both in product design and manufacturing
process. Products of this segment are sold to commercial and industrial
distributors and end-users for manufacturing and commercial applications.
Products used in process industries include various types of
instrumentation, valves and control systems for measurement and control of
fluid flow. Included are various types of meters such as rotometers, positive
displacement meters, magnetic flow meters, turbine meters, direct mass flow
meters and laboratory instruments to measure water quality. Other products
include solid state telemetering equipment, various types of pressure and
vacuum relief valves and personal computer-based software used for industrial
automation applications. In addition, Emerson manufactures and sells
temperature sensors, pressure sensors and transmitters used to measure and/or
control temperature, pressure, level and rate and amount of flow. Also
produced are process gas chromatographs, in-situ absorptive oxygen analyzers,
infrared gas and trace moisture analyzers, combustion analyzers and systems,
and other analyzers which measure pH and conductivity. Emerson also
manufactures and sells sliding stem valves, rotary valves, plastic-lined plug
valves, butterfly valves, pressure regulators, and related actuators and
controllers.
Emerson also manufactures electronic measurement and data acquisition
equipment for use in industrial processing. In addition, Emerson produces
vibratory separating equipment used primarily in the chemical, mining,
pharmaceutical, food processing, pulp and paper, ceramic and metal-working
markets.
Beginning with a line of electric motors for industrial and heavy
commercial applications, Emerson's products for industrial automation include
certain kinds of integral horsepower motors, gear drives, pump motors,
alternators, electronic variable speed drives and diesel generator sets.
Emerson also produces electronic uninterruptible power supplies, power
conditioning and distribution equipment, modular power systems and
environmental control systems used in communications and information processing
applications.
Emerson manufactures and sells components for the transmission and
regulation of mechanical power, such as certain kinds of chains, sprockets,
sheaves, gears, bearings, couplings and speed reducers, and a line of cam-
operated index drives, programmable motion controllers and automation
accessories. These products are used primarily in industrial and commercial
applications requiring the transmission of mechanical motion or drive systems
of various types.
Emerson also manufactures a line of multi-purpose pressure and solenoid
valves, pressure, vacuum and temperature switches, automatic transfer switches,
remote control switches and electric power control systems. These products are
widely used in the automation of equipment and industrial processes and for the
control of emergency electric power.
Emerson also produces a variety of industrial and commercial ultrasonic
products for applications such as cleaning, sealing, welding and flaw
detection. Other products include material preparation and microstructure
<PAGE> 37
analysis equipment. Emerson also manufactures electric circulation heaters,
fluid heat transfer systems and component heating elements.
Emerson manufactures a broad line of components for current-and noncurrent-
carrying electrical distribution devices such as panelboards, receptacles,
fittings, cable handling reels and lighting products for use in hazardous and
nonhazardous environments.
Appliance and Construction-Related Components
The Appliance and Construction-Related segment consists of fractional
horsepower motors; appliance components; heating, ventilating and air
conditioning components; and tools. This segment includes components sold to
distributors and original equipment manufacturers for inclusion in end-products
and systems (ultimately sold through commercial and residential building
construction channels); and construction-related products which retain their
identity and are sold through distributors to consumers and the professional
trades.
Emerson manufactures and sells a variety of components and systems for
refrigeration and comfort control applications, including hermetic and semi-
hermetic compressors; hermetic motors and terminals for hermetically sealed
compressors; and fractional and sub-fractional horsepower motors for selected
appliance, office equipment, ventilating equipment, pump, heater and other
motor-driven machine applications. Automatic temperature controls, timers,
switches, and thermo-protective devices are manufactured for gas and electric
heating systems, refrigeration and air conditioning equipment and various large
and small appliances. Emerson also manufactures and sells a variety of
electric heating elements and electrostatic air cleaners.
Emerson manufactures and sells a line of electrical products primarily for
the residential markets, including humidifiers, electric waste disposers, hot
water dispensers, ventilating equipment and exhaust fans.
Emerson is a producer of selected professional and hardware tools and
service equipment. These products include certain kinds of wrenches, thread
cutters, pipe cutters, reamers, vises, pipe and bolt threading machines and
sewer and drain cleaning equipment. The principal markets for these
professional tools and service equipment include plumbing, heating and air
conditioning contractors, construction and maintenance companies, petroleum and
gas producers, refiners and processors, and farm and home consumers.
Emerson also produces a specialized line of light-duty industrial bench
power tools, ladders and scaffolding and related accessories. Also produced by
Emerson for marketing by a major retailer are shop vacuum cleaners, a line of
bench tools for home workshop use and a line of hand tools including adjustable
wrenches, screwdrivers, pliers and chisels.
Description of Emerson Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Emerson consists of 400,000,000 shares of
Emerson Common Stock and 5,400,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $2.50
per share (the "Emerson Preferred Stock"). As of December 31, 1995, there were
224,036,674 shares of Emerson Common Stock outstanding and no shares of Emerson
Preferred Stock outstanding.
<PAGE> 38
Common Stock
Subject to the rights of any Emerson Preferred Stock which may be issued in
the future, each holder of Emerson Common Stock on the applicable record date
is entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the board of
directors of Emerson out of funds legally available therefor, and in the event
of liquidation, to share pro rata in any distribution of Emerson's assets
remaining after payment of liabilities. Generally, the vote of the holders of
a majority of shares of voting stock shall decide all matters presented to a
vote of shareholders of Emerson, unless, by express provision of law, Emerson's
Restated Articles of Incorporation or Emerson's By-laws, a different vote is
required. All shares of Emerson Common Stock and Emerson Preferred Stock are
deemed to be voting stock of Emerson, and all holders thereof shall be entitled
to one vote for each share of stock standing in their names, respectively.
Holders of Emerson Common Stock have no pre-emptive rights to purchase or
subscribe for any stock or other securities of Emerson. The outstanding
Emerson Common Stock is, and the Emerson Common Shares offered hereby when sold
and delivered will be, fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred Stock
The Board of Directors of Emerson has the authority to issue the shares of
Emerson Preferred Stock in one or more series and to fix, by resolution, the
number of shares constituting any such series, the designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including the dividend
rights, dividend rates, terms of redemption (including sinking fund
provisions), redemption prices, conversion rights, amounts payable on
liquidation and liquidation preferences of the shares constituting any series,
without any further vote or action by the shareholders. Each holder of Emerson
Preferred Stock will be entitled to one vote per share on all matters presented
to a vote of shareholders of Emerson. No shares of Emerson Preferred Stock are
outstanding. Any shares of Emerson Preferred Stock so authorized and issued
would have priority over the Emerson Common Stock with respect to dividend and
liquidation rights.
On November 1, 1988, the Emerson Board of Directors designated 2,500,000
shares of Emerson Preferred Stock as Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, par value $2.50 per share, in connection with the adoption of the
Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan (described below), but no shares of Series
A Junior Participating Preferred Stock have been issued as of the date hereof.
Certain Effects of Authorized but Unissued Stock
Emerson's authorized but unissued shares, as well as treasury shares, are
available for future issuance without shareholder approval. These additional
shares may be utilized for a variety of proper corporate purposes, including
future public offerings to raise additional capital, to facilitate corporate
acquisitions and for employee benefit plans.
One of the effects of the existence of unissued and unreserved Emerson
Preferred Stock and Emerson Common Stock could be to enable Emerson's Board of
Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management which could
render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of Emerson
means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and thereby
protect the continuity of Emerson's management. Issuance of Emerson Preferred
<PAGE> 39
Stock might, under certain circumstances, deter the acquisition of Emerson or
its securities by a person concerned about the terms or effect of such Emerson
Preferred Stock. No such attempt to obtain control is known to Emerson
management.
Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan
In November, 1988, Emerson's Board of Directors approved and implemented a
Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan (the "Rights Plan"), designed to assure
that all of Emerson's shareholders receive fair and equal treatment in the
event of any proposed takeover and to guard against abusive takeover tactics.
Pursuant to the Rights Plan, the Board of Directors declared a dividend
distribution of one Preferred Share Purchase Right (a "Right") for each
outstanding share of Emerson Common Stock as of the record date of November 14,
1988. Initially, the Rights are evidenced by and trade with the Emerson Common
Stock certificates and no separate Rights certificates exist. Until the Rights
become separable as described below, a Right will accompany every share of
Emerson Common Stock, whether initially issued or issued from Emerson's
treasury.
The Rights would become exercisable and separate from Emerson Common Stock
on the earlier to occur of (i) ten days following a public announcement that a
person or group of affiliated or associated persons (an "Acquiring Person") has
acquired 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Emerson Common Stock, or (ii)
ten business days (or such later date as determined by the Board of Directors
prior to such time as any person becomes an Acquiring Person) following the
commencement of, or announcement of an intention to make, a tender offer or
exchange offer, the consummation of which would result in the beneficial
ownership by a person or group of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of
Emerson Common Stock. The 20% thresholds may be reduced to not less than 10%
or the highest percentage known by Emerson to be owned by any person or group,
by the Board of Directors in its discretion.
When exercisable, each Right would entitle the registered holder to
purchase one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, par value $2.50 per share, at an exercise price of $120 per one-
hundredth of a share, subject to certain adjustments. Each share of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters
submitted to a vote of shareholders. Emerson has reserved for issuance the
number of shares of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock issuable
upon exercise of the Rights.
If any person or group of affiliated or associated persons acquires 20% or
more but less than 50% of Emerson Common Stock outstanding, each Right, except
those which have become void because held by certain persons, may be exchanged
by the Board of Directors for one share of Emerson Common Stock or one-
hundredth of a share of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock,
subject to certain adjustments.
In the event that Emerson is acquired in a merger or other business
combination transaction or 50% or more of its consolidated assets or earning
power is sold, proper provision will be made so that each holder of a Right
will thereafter have the right to receive, upon the exercise thereof at the
then current exercise price of the Right, that number of shares of common stock
of the acquiring company which at the time of such transaction will have a
market value of two times the exercise price of the Right.
<PAGE> 40
In the event that (i) any person becomes an Acquiring Person (unless such
person first acquires 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Emerson Common
Stock by a purchase pursuant to a tender offer for all of the shares of Emerson
Common Stock for cash, which purchase increases such person's beneficial
ownership to 80% or more of the outstanding shares of Emerson Common Stock) or
(ii) during such time as there is an Acquiring Person, there will be a
reclassification of securities or a recapitalization or reorganization of
Emerson or other transaction or series of transactions involving Emerson which
has the effect of increasing by more than 1% the proportionate share of the
outstanding shares of any class of equity securities of Emerson or any of its
subsidiaries beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person, proper provision will
be made so that each holder of a Right, other than Rights beneficially owned by
the Acquiring Person (which will thereafter be void), will thereafter have the
right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of Emerson Common Stock
having a market value of two times the exercise price of the Right.
The Rights can be redeemed, in whole but not in part, by the Emerson Board
of Directors for one cent per Right (the "Redemption Price") at any time prior
to the acquisition by a person or group of affiliated or associated persons of
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the Emerson Common Stock. In addition,
if a bidder who does not beneficially own more than 1% of the Emerson Common
Stock (and who has not within the past year owned in excess of 1% of the
Emerson Common Stock and, at a time he held such greater than 1% stake,
disclosed, or caused the disclosure of, an intention which relates to or would
result in the acquisition or influence of control of Emerson) proposes to
acquire all of the Emerson Common Stock (and all other shares of capital stock
of Emerson entitled to vote with the Emerson Common Stock in the election of
directors or on mergers, consolidations, sales of all or substantially all of
Emerson's assets, liquidations, dissolutions or windings up) for cash at a
price which a nationally recognized investment banker selected by such bidder
states in writing is fair, and such bidder has obtained written financing
commitments (or otherwise has financing) and complies with certain procedural
requirements, then Emerson, upon the request of such bidder, will hold a
special shareholders meeting to vote on a resolution requesting the Board of
Directors to accept the bidder's proposal. If a majority vote in favor of such
resolution, then for a period of 60 days after such meeting the Rights will be
automatically redeemed at the Redemption Price immediately prior to the
consummation of any tender offer for all of such shares at a price per share in
cash equal to or greater than the price offered by such bidder; provided,
however, that no redemption will be permitted or required after the acquisition
by any person or group of affiliated or associated persons of beneficial
ownership of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Emerson Common Stock.
Immediately upon any redemption of the Rights, the right to exercise the Rights
will terminate and the only right of the holders will be to receive the
Redemption Price. The Rights, which do not have voting privileges, expire on
November 1, 1998, unless such date is extended or the Rights are earlier
redeemed.
The Rights have certain anti-takeover effects. The rights could cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire Emerson
without conditioning the offer on redemption of the Rights or on substantially
all of the Rights also being acquired. The Rights should not, however,
interfere with any merger or other business combination approved by the Board
of Directors since the Rights may be redeemed by Emerson as described above.
<PAGE> 41
Certain Charter and By-Law Provisions
The charter and by-laws of Emerson contain certain provisions, among other
things, establishing a classified board, limiting changes in the size of the
board, the removal of directors and the filling of vacancies, limiting the
calling of shareholder meetings, and restricting certain business combinations.
See "Comparative Rights of Shareholders." These provisions may have anti-
takeover effects.
INFORMATION ABOUT ROLLWAY
General
Rollway's history began 116 years ago in 1880 with the opening of the C. E.
Lipe shop. Since then Rollway has designed and manufactured a myriad of
products and has become recognized as a premier bearing and material handling
manufacturer.
Rollway currently has two domestic divisions - Rollway Bearing and Lipe
Automation Equipment, both manufacturing in Syracuse, New York - and an
international subsidiary, Lipe-Rollway N.V. ("LRNV") with offices and a
warehouse in Kontich, Belgium. Rollway currently employs a total of
approximately 290 people.
Rollway Bearing Division provides high quality, high performance, precision
bearings for a wide variety of industries that include aerospace, mining,
agriculture, construction and precision manufacturing. Lipe Automation
Equipment manufactures beltless, vibratory, positioning, feeding and conveyor
systems under the trademark Dyna-Slide and the Lipe Bar Feed line of equipment,
which serves the machine tool industry. LRNV has responsibility for Rollway's
international operations, providing an international distribution channel in 85
countries outside the United States. Much of the product sold by LRNV is
manufactured to Rollway quality specifications with the Rollway label and is
produced by a variety of different Eastern European and other manufacturers.
Rollway Bearing
Rollway Bearing manufactures high quality cylindrical roller bearings,
cylindrical thrust bearings, tapered thrust bearings and angular contact ball
bearings up to 42 inch outside diameters.
Industry and Market Overview
American Bearing Manufacturers Association statistics for the first two
quarters of 1995 show positive industry growth compared to the prior year.
Bearing shipments (except tapered roller bearings) were up 17%. Rollway
shipments for fiscal year 1995 were up 21%, incoming orders 17% and backlog
16%, in each case over fiscal 1994. Rollway has recently seen strength in the
Original Equipment Manufacturing ("OEM") marketplace, and an increase in
government sales. During the past year Rollway has taken a far more selective
approach with respect to aerospace marketing resulting in a decrease in
aerospace business. Government sales have been strong in non-aerospace
bearings.
<PAGE> 42
Market Size and Potential
The total US cylindrical bearing market for products which can be
manufactured by Rollway is estimated at $250 million per year. This does not
include automotive applications. Rollway has the potential to gain market
share specifically in the steel and oil field equipment industries.
Aftermarket sales through distribution also offer substantial growth
opportunities for Rollway.
Sales and Distribution
Rollway's primary OEM customers produce off-highway equipment, machinery,
hydraulic pumps, industrial gear boxes and oil field equipment. Rollway
maintains a small but important position with all major distributors due to a
long history of quality products. Aerospace sales are for helicopter
transmissions and hydraulic pumps.
Competition and Technology
The Rollway Bearing Division has a number of very large multi-national
competitors and several smaller domestic producers of cylindrical and thrust
bearings.
Rollway has an ongoing program with Crucible Steel and Syracuse University
to develop a hot, isostatically pressed material to be used as a bearing steel.
This material exhibits excellent hardness, fine, uniform distribution of
carbides and few non-metallic inclusions. Rollway's largest aerospace customer
has shown interest in this program and testing will begin in 1996.
Lipe Automation Equipment
Lipe Automation Equipment ("LAE") is a value-added, engineer to-order,
supplier of parts handling equipment, serving both the assembly automation and
screw machine industries for over 25 years. With 1995 revenues of
approximately $3.1 million and approximately 28 employees, LAE has developed a
reputation for delivering quality products and service.
Industry & Market Overview
The Dyna-Slide product line is one of the most respected names in the parts
handling business, with a customer base that includes many of the Fortune 1000.
By focusing the majority of its efforts in the automotive, bearing, glass,
powdered metal and ceramic, plastic injection molding, metal stamping, and
machining industries, LAE has, in many cases, become the de facto standard for
supporting the gentle handling and difficult part orientation requirements of
many major American manufacturers. The Lipe Bar Feed is a mature product that
has significant name recognition in the machine tool industry. LAE's Single
Spindle bar feed units have a reputation of uncompromised reliability and
quality. With over 14,000 Lipe Bar Feed units sold and delivered, a strong
spare parts business has evolved in support of the maintenance and repair needs
of customers.
<PAGE> 43
Market Size and Potential
The Dyna-Slide and Bar Feed products service many industries. Because of
Dyna-Slide's careful handling capability, its markets include glass, powdered
metals, powdered ceramics, plastic injection moldings, bearings and other
finished or fragile parts. Bar Feed has its main application as a complement
to automatic screw machines. It also adds value to centerless grinder, thread
rollers, automatic lathes, punch presses, cut off machines and production
automatics. The automatic positioning of each new bar brings more productivity
as well as a fast and easy set up. The market potential for both of these
products within their current industries can be extended with more
representation of the product through increased marketing and sales efforts.
The potential also exists for new markets with the new technology enhancements
and engineering expertise currently available within LAE.
Sales and Distribution
The business outlook for both the Dyna-Slide and Bar Feed lines of business
remains positive with expectations of annual growth over the next 5 years. Use
of sales representative organizations to market and support LAE's products
provides increased territory coverage and exposure for the high quality
manufacturing solutions offered by LAE. A heightened commitment towards
stocking programs will promote an increase in the spare parts business. This
augments LAE's distribution network by supporting customers with the proper
solutions at the time they are needed.
Competition and Technology
The introduction of the new Lipe Short Bar Feed system in the first half of
1996 should enhance LAE's competitive edge. The ability to modify a proven
product to adapt to new applications such as this, assists LAE in penetrating
more markets and becoming more competitive. In addition, the focus on
providing more turnkey solutions with Dyna-Slide, through integration of other
automation components, like pick-n-place and rotary index tables, makes Dyna-
Slide a more versatile product. The addition of PLC (programmable logic
controllers) technology to products adds a broader market potential through the
computer programming versatility of this application. This technology enhances
LAE's presence in the competitive marketplace of complete, automated equipment
solutions. The introduction of the Flexible Feeder as a part of the LAE
equipment line should enhance LAE's market presence. The advantage of the
Flexible Feeder is the multi-use capability to adapt to different tooling needs
for application with more types of equipment. The competitive advantage lies
in the need for only one piece of adaptable equipment as opposed to multiple,
single use pieces. The continued development of engineering capability and new
technology together with LAE's reputation is enabling LAE to compete with
established machine builders in becoming a premier supplier of automated
systems.
A critical success factor will be the development of an engineering
competency that provides for not only the conceptual development of LAE's
solutions, but also the credibility needed in order to compete with the more
established specialty machine builders. In order to be successful, LAE must
leverage its reputation and expertise in the parts handling business, and
deliver quality products on time. If LAE is successful in making the
transition from being strictly a product supplier to more of a systems
integrator, the long term growth potential is significant.
<PAGE> 44
European sales as a percentage of total sales turnover are increasing.
Germany and Eastern Europe have been recent growth areas. Part of this growth
has stemmed from a new authorized Rollway distributor in Slovania. This will
help become a basis for expansion into other countries. Growth will continue
in this market with the settling of political situations in this area. South
East Asia and North Africa are two new target areas. With the fastest growing
economic center in the world in South East Asia, there are many opportunities
for expansion in this market. The experience of LRNV's sales people should be
beneficial in penetrating the North African area. LRNV is currently developing
new selling techniques for the local Antwerp market as well.
Properties
Rollway owns and maintains office and manufacturing facilities in one
location in the Syracuse, New York metropolitan area. This facility has an
aggregate floor space of approximately 222,000 square feet. LRNV owns an
office and distribution facility in Kontich, Belgium with an aggregate floor
space of approximately 59,500 square feet.
Legal Proceedings and Administrative Matters
Rollway is a party from time to time to legal proceedings in the ordinary
course of its business. Rollway in not engaged at the present time in any
legal proceeding of a material nature.
During the course of the due diligence process, Emerson and Rollway noted
several environmental issues with respect to Rollway's Syracuse, New York
facility. These issues, which involve primarily the discharge of materials,
have been reported as required to the appropriate governmental authorities.
Without further site characterization studies, it is difficult to determine the
actual costs of remediating the underlying problems. The estimated range of
costs is $900,000 to $2,300,000. The lower of these amounts has been reflected
in Rollway's year end December 3, 1995 financial statements. No proceeding has
been instituted or threatened to be instituted by any governmental authority as
of the date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus with respect to any of these
environmental issues.
Also during the due diligence process it was noted that Rollway has not
complied with certain requirements set forth in the Emergency Planning and
Community Right to Know Act and certain foreign reporting requirements.
Failure to comply with these requirements can result in the imposition of civil
penalties against Rollway. As of the date of this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
no such penalties have been imposed or threatened by any governmental
authority.
In February 1996, a former employee instituted an action against Rollway in
the New York State Division of Human Rights. The individual is alleging that
he was terminated because of his race. Rollway believes that it was justified
in terminating the individual as part of reduction in force and intends to
vigorously defend the action.
In March 1996, an action was commenced against LRNV, Rollway's
international subsidiary, by a former employee alleging wrongful termination.
The action seeks lost commissions. LRNV believes that it had just cause for
terminating the employee and that no commissions were owed the former employee
as the result of the circumstances surrounding the termination.
<PAGE> 45
In the opinion of Rollway's management, neither of the actions described
above will have a material impact on Rollway's results of operations or
liquidity.
Executive Officers and Directors
The executive officers and directors of Rollway, their respective ages and
positions held are as follows:
Name Age Position
- ------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr. 68 Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and Director
Stephen M. Bregande 48 Director, President and Chief
Operating Officer
William Eames 50 Chief Financial Officer
D. M. Mawhinney, Jr. 69 Director, General Counsel and
Secretary
Donald F. Dew 71 Director
L. Richard Oliker 62 Director
Edward F. Reynolds 60 Director
Edmund J. Babiarz 42 Vice President
Karl Loessner 59 Vice President, Managing Director
LRNV
Business Experience
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Hodgkins has served as a director of Rollway since 1963 and has
been Chief Executive Officer since 1973. Mr. Hodgkins has over 45 years with
Rollway.
Stephen M. Bregande, Director, President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr.
Bregande has served as a director and as Chief Operating Officer of Rollway
since 1994. Prior to joining the company, he was Vice-President and General
Manager of Data Net Inc. and Vice-President and General Manager at Dun &
Bradstreet Software. Mr. Bregande has also held other positions with Xerox
Corporation.
William J. Eames, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Eames has
served as Chief Financial Officer of Rollway since 1992 and as Treasurer since
1991. His prior financial experience was with General Electric.
D. M. Mawhinney, Jr., Director, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr.
Mawhinney has served as a director of Rollway since 1976 and as General Counsel
and Secretary since 1988. He is a partner in the law firm of Hiscock &
Barclay, LLP, Syracuse, New York.
<PAGE> 46
Donald F. Dew, Director. Mr. Dew has served as a director of Rollway since
1988. He is currently retired. Mr. Dew is the Chairman of the Board of
Diemolding Corporation, a plastic molding firm located in Syracuse, New York
and is a director of Fleet Bank of NY, Regional Board.
L. Richard Oliker, Director. Mr. Oliker has served as a director of
Rollway since 1981. He is a Professor Emeritus from Syracuse University and
currently serves as a Director of American General Life Insurance Company of
NY, Diemolding Corporation and Fleet Bank of NY, Regional Board.
Edward F. Reynolds, Director. Mr. Reynolds has served as a director of
Rollway since 1988. He is retired and is the former President and Chief
Executive Officer of R.E. Dietz Company, Syracuse, New York (lighting equipment
manufacturer).
Edmund J. Babiarz, Vice President. Mr. Babiarz has served as Vice-
President of Rollway since May, 1995. Prior to joining Rollway, he was
employed by Dun & Bradstreet Software and was involved in management strategy
and sales direction. Mr. Babiarz also has had experience with Baan
International (software company) and Xerox Corporation.
Karl Loessner, Vice-President, Managing Director of Lipe-Rollway N.V. Mr.
Loessner has been a Vice-President of Rollway since May, 1995. He became
Managing Director of Lipe-Rollway N.V. in 1986. Mr. Loessner has over 35 years
experience in the bearing industry and has been responsible for developing an
international distribution channel for Rollway's products in over 85 countries.
He was previously employed by Torrington (bearing manufacturer).
<PAGE> 47
Security Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of Rollway Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock as of
[.........., 1996] by (i) each current director and executive officer of
Rollway, (ii) all current directors and executive officers of Rollway as a
group and (iii) each person or group of persons known by Rollway to
beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Rollway Common
Stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares of % of Shares of % of
Common Common Preferred Preferred
Stock Stock Stock Stock
Beneficially Beneficially Beneficially Beneficially
Owned Owned Owned Owned
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Directors and Executive Officers
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr.<F1>,<F2> 340,637 41.5 817,805 19.00
Stephen M. Bregande<F3> 60,984 7.44 126 .13
D. M. Mawhinney, Jr. 3,837 .47 182 .19
Edward F. Reynolds 260 .03 -- --
Edmund J. Babiarz<F4> 6,666 .81 -- --
All current directors and executive officers
as a group (9 in group) 412,384 50.33 18,113 19.33
5% Shareholders
Key Trust Company and H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr.
as Co-Trustees U/W H. Follett Hodgkins 20,082 2.45 4,593 4.90
Key Trust Company and H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr.
as Co-Trustees U/W Ruth S. Hodgkins 106,762 13.03 5,688 6.07
Cynthia Hodgkins Schallmo 47,838 5.84 297 3.17
H. Follett Hodgkins, III 44,361 5.41 146 .16
- ---------------
<FN>
<F1> Includes 4,368 shares of Common Stock and 862 shares of Preferred Stock owned by Mr. Hodgkins' wife,
Ann Hodgkins. Mr. Hodgkins disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
<F2> Includes 126,844 shares of Common Stock and 10,281 shares of Preferred Stock with respect to which
Mr. Hodgkins is a Co-Trustee with Key Trust Company (see "5% Shareholders"). Mr. Hodgkins has the
right to vote and dispose of all such shares.
<F3> Includes 60,000 shares of Common Stock, which is the number of shares Mr. Bregande will be entitled
to acquire pursuant to Rollway's existing option plan if the Merger is approved. (See "The Merger -
The Rollway Options.")
<F4> Includes 6,666 shares of Common Stock, which is the number of shares Mr. Babiarz will be entitled to
acquire pursuant to Rollway's existing option plan if the Merger is approved. (See "The Merger -
The Rollway Options.").
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 48
Description of Rollway Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Rollway consists of 1,500,000 shares of
Rollway Common Stock and 250,000 shares of Rollway Preferred Stock. As of
[.........., 1996] there were 752,628 shares of Rollway Common Stock
outstanding and 93,692 shares of Rollway Preferred Stock outstanding.
Rollway Common Stock
Subject to the rights of the Rollway Preferred Stock described below, each
holder of Rollway Common Stock on the applicable record date is entitled to
receive such dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors of Rollway
out of funds legally available therefore, and in the event of liquidation, to
share pro rata in any distribution of Rollway's assets remaining after the
payment of liabilities and the payment of any amounts due the holders of
Rollway Preferred Stock. Each share of Rollway Common Stock entitles the
holder thereof to one vote on all matters properly submitted to Rollway's
shareholders. Except as otherwise required by law or by Rollway's Certificate
of Incorporation, the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Rollway Common Stock is required to approve a matter presented to a vote of the
shareholders of Rollway. Holders of Rollway Common Stock have no pre-emptive
rights to purchase or subscribe for any stock or other securities of Rollway.
The outstanding stock of Rollway is fully paid and non-assessable.
Rollway Preferred Stock
Each share of Rollway Preferred Stock entitles the holder thereof to a
dividend of $1.00 per share when declared by the Board of Directors of Rollway
and to a preference of $10.00 per share in the event of the liquidation of
Rollway. Dividends on the Rollway Preferred Stock are cumulative and are
required to be paid prior to the payment of any dividends on the Rollway Common
Stock. Holders of Rollway Preferred Stock generally are not entitled to vote
on matters presented to Rollway shareholders; provided, however, if Rollway
shall have failed to pay the stated dividend on the Rollway Preferred Stock for
a period of three or more years, the holders of the Rollway Preferred Stock,
voting as a class, shall be entitled to elect two of Rollway's directors. No
dividends have been declared or paid on Rollway Preferred Stock since the
fourth quarter of 1993. Rollway has the right to redeem the Rollway Preferred
Stock at any time for a price of $20.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid
dividends thereon to the redemption date.
Description of Rollway Options
On January 5, 1995, the Rollway shareholders approved a performance stock
option plan pursuant to which a total of 80,000 shares of Rollway Common Stock
were reserved for issuance. As of [.........., 1996], a total of 66,666
Rollway Options were outstanding pursuant to the plan. Of this amount, 60,000
were held by Stephen M. Bregande and 6,666 were held by Edmund J. Babiarz
pursuant to separate Incentive Stock Option Agreements (the "Incentive
Agreements"). The option exercise price is established in the Incentive
Agreements at $1.80 per share.
<PAGE> 49
The Incentive Agreements initially set forth the following vesting
schedules for Messrs. Bregande and Babiarz:
Total No. of Shares Vested
----------------------------------------------------
Year Bregande Babiarz
- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
1994 20,000 1,667
1995 35,000 3,333
1996 50,000 5,000
1997 60,000 6,666
1998 60,000 6,666
Vesting was to occur, however, only if certain defined performance goals were
satisfied. These goals were satisfied for fiscal years' 1994 and 1995.
Notwithstanding the vesting schedule, the Incentive Agreements each provide
that the Rollway Options granted thereunder shall immediately vest and become
fully exercisable upon a "Change in Control". Change in Control is defined to
include: (i) any one or more persons other than an existing affiliate becoming
the beneficial owner of at least 50% of the combined voting power of Rollway's
securities; (ii) the sale of more than 50% (based on book value) of Rollway's
assets; or (iii) Rollway being merged or consolidated with any other person
other than an affiliate.
On February 8, 1996, the Option Committee of Rollway's Board of Directors
amended the Rollway Option Plan and each Rollway Option to provide that all
Rollway Options shall become vested immediately prior to the Effective Time and
shall be exercised at such time by the holders thereof. All shares of Rollway
Common Stock received upon exercise of the Rollway Options prior to the
Effective Time shall be converted in the Merger into the right to receive
Emerson Common Stock. The holders of the Rollway Options have agreed to
exercise such options prior to the Effective Time, subject to the consummation
of the Merger. See "The Merger - The Rollway Options."
Director/Officer Indemnification
During 1992, a criminal investigation was commenced by the United States of
America against Rollway and three of its employees. The resulting suit alleged
that Rollway and the employees submitted false cost or pricing data in
connection with a U.S. Army Contract.
In 1995, Rollway entered into an agreement with the federal government
pursuant to which Rollway agreed to make restitution in the amount of $400,000
and to take certain steps to help ensure future compliance in connection with
government contracts. The three individuals, one of which (Robert Wiehl) was
an officer of Rollway, were tried in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of New York. Each of these individuals was acquitted of all
charges.
Over the past several years, Rollway made indemnification payments to these
individuals in connection with the lawsuit. These payments were made pursuant
to certain agreements which provided for indemnification of certain expenses by
Rollway if the individuals were acquitted. The payments totaled approximately
$370,000, of which approximately $65,000 related to Robert Wiehl.
<PAGE> 50
At its March 13, 1996 special meeting, the Board of Directors of Rollway
passed a resolution authorizing the procurement of continuing insurance
coverage for Rollway's existing officers and directors after the Merger. A
policy was obtained in March 1996 at a one-time cost of approximately $65,000,
which provides for an aggregate of $3,000,000 of such coverage for a period of
six years.
1995, 1994 and 1993 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Operating Results
Net sales for fiscal 1995 amounted to $46,493,462 representing an increase
of 41.3% above 1994 net sales. The net sales for 1994 were $32,903,821 or an
increase of 1.4% from 1993 net sales of $32,453,081. The increase in sales for
fiscal 1995 was primarily attributable to increased sales in the Rollway
international bearing markets. The backlog of sales orders, as of the end of
fiscal 1995, amounted to $17,065,164 which represented an increase of
$6,128,164 or 56.0% compared to 1994. The largest share of the sales order
backlog increase in 1995 over 1994 came from an improvement in Rollway's
domestic and international bearing markets. The domestic backlog increased
16.4% and international 57.2% over 1994. Increased volume in the international
markets was achieved through adding a new distributor and additional
availability of product from Rollway's international suppliers in 1995.
Domestically, prices and volume increased during 1995. Distribution product
pricing was increased by 7.5%, 5.0% and 5.5% for 1995, 1994 and 1993
respectively. There were no new product releases during these years.
Costs of product sold expressed as a percent of sales were 70.9% in 1995,
72.4% in 1994 and 75.4% in 1993. Domestic bearing gross profits as a percent
to sales increased in all three years (22%, 20% and 16% in 1995, 1994 and
1993). Efficiency increases domestically were the result of additions of new
equipment and reengineering of the manufacturing processes. The international
business has continued to grow and the gross profit margin associated therewith
has remained constant. The international business carries a higher gross
profit margin and a higher percentage sales and general administrative expense
(e.g., commissions) than that associated with the domestic business.
Selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $8,728,829 in
1995, $7,453,184 in 1994 and $6,957,418 in 1993. The major increases in 1995
were the result of increased operating expenses in the international division
due to increased sales volume. Overall selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of sales are 18.8%, 22.7% and 21.4% for 1995, 1994 and
1993 respectively. The decline in the 1995 percentage is primarily the result
of increased sales volume. During 1994 Rollway started its reengineering
process and incurred additional expenses over 1993. Domestically, Rollway
incurred a $30,000 fine to the Federal Government as noted in the Rollway
financial statements note 9 and incurred added expense in writing off bad
debts. These items accounted for a portion of the increase in administrative
expenses from 1993 to 1994. During 1994 the international division experienced
a currency transaction expense of $143,000 versus $49,000 income in 1993.
Other administrative expenses incurred in 1995 totaled $1,488,108. These
expenses were composed of one time expenses. They include merger related
professional fees ($318,000), defense of former employees ($270,000) and
potential environmental clean up issues ($900,000). The environmental issues
were noted as part of the due diligence process. These issues, which primarily
<PAGE> 51
involve the discharge of materials at Rollway's Syracuse, New York facility,
have been reported as required to the appropriate governmental authorities.
Preliminary estimates of the potential costs of remediation associated with
these matters indicate a range of costs between $900,000 and $2,300,000.
Significantly more site characterization will have to be performed, however, in
order to arrive at a reliable estimate. Because it cannot determine what
amount within the estimated range represents a better estimate, Rollway has
recorded a $900,000 liability at December 3, 1995. Management of Rollway, in
conjunction with its environmental advisors, has estimated that $70,000 of this
liability will be incurred during the ensuing fiscal year and consequently, the
remainder of the liability has been classified as long-term.
Interest expense was $1,746,486, $1,208,949 and $1,021,935 in 1995, 1994
and 1993, respectively. The increases in 1994 to 1995 and 1993 to 1994 were
$537,537 and $187,014, respectively. The primary reason for the increase was
increased domestic borrowing.
The unusual relationship of income tax expense to pre-tax income results
generally from foreign income being taxed at higher than U.S. statutory rates
and from domestic losses for which no tax benefits have been recognized. See
note 5 to the Rollway financial statements for more information concerning
Rollway's tax position.
1995 net income of $707,074 increased 596% over 1994 despite other
administrative expenses incurred. 1994 net income was $101,588 versus a loss
of $146,132 in 1993.
Rollway continues to compensate for inflationary cost increases through its
efforts to control costs in the area of operating expenses, procedures designed
to maximize volume efficiencies, and offsetting price increases to customers.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Rollway's net cash flow was $321,830, $50,340 and ($189,334) in 1995, 1994
and 1993 respectively. Cash provided by operating activities was $58,245,
($229,071) and $1,076,116 for 1995, 1994 and 1993 respectively. Cash flow from
operations increased in 1995 over 1994 primarily due to increased income, but
was down from levels in 1993 when trade receivables and inventories increased
at a slower rate and accounts payable increased significantly over 1992 levels.
Purchases of property, plant and equipment in 1995 and 1994 were $1,540,223 and
$1,800,146. This was due to investment in new and refurbished equipment in the
domestic bearing factory. The increases in trade accounts receivable and
inventories in 1995 over 1994 were the result of increased sales activity.
Rollway had domestic and foreign lines of credit, which provide for short-term
borrowings up to approximately $10,020,000 at December 3, 1995. Borrowings
against these lines of credit aggregated $8,686,818 at December 3, 1995.
Rollway also had at December 3, 1995 checks outstanding in excess of bank
balances in the amount of $501,671 and $995,224 of current portion of long term
debt. Such amounts were $433,405 and $880,697, respectively, at November 27,
1994. The weighted average interest rate on short term borrowings outstanding
as of December 3, 1995 was 10.35%. As of February 28, 1996 the average
interest rate on outstanding short term debt was 9.76%. The domestic portion
of the lines of credit were refinanced on March 21, 1995. As more fully
discussed in the Rollway financial statements note 2, Rollway has both short
and long term debt agreements, with the majority of the interest based on the
prime rate. These debt agreements were entered into to support Rollway's
working capital and long term equipment needs. Additional covenants created
<PAGE> 52
with the change of lending institutions added a minimum current ratio
calculation of 1.25 and a liabilities to tangible net worth of not more than 4
to 1. Rollway is in compliance with all of the debt covenants to date.
During 1995 accrued expenses increased 83% over 1994 levels. This increase
was due to increased commission and bonus accrual of $300,000, accrued legal
fees of $270,000 (see Rollway financial statements note 8) and increased
pension requirements of $158,499. The financing activities show increased
borrowings in all three years. During 1994 Rollway's domestic lender offered a
short term loan to Rollway to add working capital and additional manufacturing
equipment. During 1995 this short term loan was converted to a long term note
adding additional capital to reengineer the business. Rollway daily cash
management is based on minimizing cash balances and interest payments by paying
down bank borrowings with all excess cash. At December 3, 1995, November 27,
1994 and November 28, 1993, long-term debt consisted of $6,766,808, $10,165,439
and $3,702,688 respectively.
Rollway refinanced its domestic debt on March 21, 1995 creating additional
funds availability. On February 27, 1996, Rollway increased its domestic line
of credit by $1,500,000. Short term borrowings for 1995 and 1994 totaled
$8,686,818 and $2,482,893 respectively, and result from the need to support
increased sales activity. Rollway maintains excess availability to borrow cash
daily to fund all outstanding checks not covered by normal daily cash
activities. It is possible to show negative cash at any point of time due to
outstanding checks exceeding cash balances as demonstrated at December 3, 1995.
However, funds to cover these checks will be borrowed as the checks are
presented to the bank or covered by daily cash receipts. As noted above,
Rollway had additional borrowing availability of $1,333,182 as of year-end
1995. The current portion of long term debt not included in short term
borrowing was $995,224, and $880,697 for 1995 and 1994, respectively. Rollway
had as of December 3, 1995 current principal long-term debt maturities of
$995,224 and $953,332 for 1996 and 1997, respectively. Also, Rollway had
current lease commitments of $130,631 and $94,128 for 1996 and 1997,
respectively. These obligations are expected to be funded by the generation of
cash flow from operations. The business plan for 1996 and 1997 shows increases
in operating profits, continued emphasis on collections of accounts receivables
and moderate increases to capital equipment expenditures. In management's
opinion, Rollway's business plan will generate sufficient cash to meet
Rollway's cash requirements and allow the short term debt to be reduced during
this period.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 52,
all balance sheet accounts of foreign subsidiaries are translated at current
exchange rates and income statement items are translated at an average exchange
rate for the year. Foreign subsidiary currencies include the Belgian Franc and
the German Deutschmark. The gain or loss resulting from translating subsidiary
financial statements is recorded as a separate component of shareholders'
equity. Foreign currency translations adjustments reflect the revaluation of
assets to current currency values as of a specific date. Due to debt covenants
in the United States and Belgium that restrict borrowing additional funds to
support working capital outside the respective country, management's
involvement in currency positioning is limited. Translation adjustments have
not impacted the statement of operations. However, transactions gains and
losses have been realized through the Belgium subsidiary as a result of dealing
with various currencies. Rollway has not used foreign currency hedging
contracts but may in the future.
<PAGE> 53
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Three months ended March 3, 1996
Operating Results
Net sales for the first quarter ended March 3, 1996 amounted to $12,105,255
representing an increase of 22.4% over net sales of $9,884,370 for the same
period in 1995. The increase in sales was attributable to increases in the
international markets. The backlog of sales orders amounted to $15,932,000,
$17,065,000 and $15,618,000 at March 3, 1996, December 3, 1995, and
February 26, 1995, respectively.
Cost of product sold expressed as a percentage of sales was 69.8% for the
first quarter of 1996 and 70.7% for the first quarter of 1995. The decrease
was primarily due to increased international sales levels which carry in a
higher gross margin than domestic sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $2,301,260 in 1996
and $2,098,552 in 1995. The increase in 1996 was due to higher distributor
commissions paid by the international division as a result of higher sales
levels. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales for
1996 and 1995 were 19.0% and 21.2% respectively.
The relationship of income tax expense to pretax income is less than the
U.S. statutory rate due to the net operating loss carry forward impact from the
domestic divisions for which no deferred tax benefit had previously been
recorded.
Interest expense amounted to $418,936 for the first quarter of 1996 and
$352,466 for the same period 1995. The increase of $66,470 was due to
increased domestic borrowing and higher interest rates during 1996.
The 1996 first quarter net income was $732,860. This was a 118% increase
over net income of $335,804 for the first quarter of 1995.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Borrowings against available short term lines of credit total $9,260,302
and $8,686,818 for the first quarter 1996 and December 3, 1995 respectively.
Total available short term lines of credit total $11,520,000 as of March 3,
1996.
Long-term debt was $6,580,296 and $6,766,808 as of the end of the first
quarter 1996 and December 3, 1995, respectively.
Rollway Bearing Division refinanced its debt on March 21, 1995. On
February 27, 1996, Rollway increased its short term available debt from
$6,500,000 to $8,000,000. The attainment of this availability is restricted to
calculations based on asset levels.
As more fully described above (see "Information about Rollway--Legal
Proceedings and Administrative Matters"), since the end of its last fiscal year
Rollway has been named as the defendant in two separate actions by former
employees each alleging that he was wrongfully terminated. Rollway believes
that the termination was justified in each instance and intends to vigorously
defend the matters. In the opinion of Rollway's management, neither of these
<PAGE> 54
actions, even if adversely determined, would have material impact on Rollway's
liquidity.
As more fully described below (see "The Merger--Background of the Merger"),
in February 1996, Rollway noted that LRNV had not filed a required report with
a foreign taxing authority listing commission payments to certain European
distributors. Although the report was subsequently filed, LRNV could be
subject to substantial penalties for the late filing. LRNV has been informed
that the imposition of the penalties is unlikely. If imposed, however, the
penalties would negatively impact Rollway's liquidity.
THE MERGER
General
The discussion in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus of the Merger and the
description of the principal terms of the Merger Agreement are subject to and
qualified in their entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, a copy of
which is attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Exhibit A and which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Background of the Merger
In May 1993, Rollway received a letter from Emerson expressing an interest
in Rollway. Shortly thereafter, Emerson and Rollway engaged in preliminary
discussions regarding a possible merger. As a result of these discussions, the
parties entered into a confidentiality agreement on June 23, 1993.
Over the course of the next several months, Rollway provided Emerson with
substantial information regarding Rollway and its operations. After an
analysis of this information, Emerson made a preliminary proposal in October
1993 to acquire Rollway. The proposal included a purchase price of $2.9
million for the Rollway Common Stock. Of this amount, approximately $1.5
million was to be held in escrow to secure against a breach of any
representations and warranties by Rollway. The proposal was followed by
meetings of Emerson representatives with H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Rollway's
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in October 1993 and with the Rollway
Board of Directors in December 1993. In January 1994, Rollway proposed a
purchase price of $5.8 million for the Rollway Common Stock. Of this amount,
approximately $.8 million was to be held in escrow.
With respect to both of the foregoing proposals and all subsequent
proposals, it was agreed that the Rollway Preferred Stock would be redeemed for
its redemption value of $20 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends and a
Non-Competition Agreement would be entered into by H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr.
(see "--Non-Competition and Employment Agreements").
Over the course of the next several months there was minimal negotiating
activity while Emerson undertook a due diligence examination of Rollway and
Rollway prepared a new business plan. Subsequently, in August 1994, Rollway
presented its business plan to Emerson in an attempt to induce Emerson to
increase its offering price. Rollway was unsuccessful in its attempt. Since
no agreement could be reached regarding price, discussions terminated.
In July 1995, Rollway expressed a renewed interest in being acquired by
Emerson. This interest led to Emerson submitting a merger proposal on
<PAGE> 55
August 10, 1995. The proposal included an all cash price of approximately $9.8
million for the Rollway Common Stock subject to possible reductions if Rollway
failed to meet a minimum net book value target and subject to a
to-be-determined escrow amount. On August 11, 1995, Rollway's Board of
Directors met to discuss the proposal and three days later submitted a counter-
proposal of $14.4 million for the Rollway Common Stock. Emerson responded on
August 31, 1995 with a new proposal which retained the original purchase price
($9.8 million) but which structured the transaction as a stock-for-stock tax-
deferred reorganization. Again, the consideration was to be subject to
possible reductions and a to-be-determined escrow amount.
On September 15, 1995, Rollway's Board of Directors met again to discuss
the revised Emerson proposal and the status of the negotiations.
Representatives of Rollway were authorized at that time to continue negotiating
a letter of intent. On September 15, 1995, Emerson and Rollway entered into a
"no-shop" agreement.
Over the course of the next two months, the parties negotiated the terms of
the letter of intent while Emerson updated its due diligence examination of
Rollway. On November 2, 1995, the parties entered into a letter of intent.
The transaction, which was subject to a number of conditions, was to be
structured as a tax-deferred merger of a subsidiary of Emerson with and into
Rollway with Rollway as the surviving corporation. As a result of the merger,
each share of Rollway Common Stock was to be converted into Emerson Common
Stock based, in part, on Rollway's balance sheet as of the closing.
On November 10, 1995, the letter of intent was amended to add Rollway's
monthly performance projections through May 1996 and extend the deadline for
execution of the Merger Agreement to May 10, 1996.
Emerson's due diligence examination of Rollway's domestic operations was
completed in December 1995. During this process, Emerson noted several items
of concern. These items principally involved certain environmental issues, the
quantity and quality of Rollway's inventories, Rollway's obligation to
indemnify certain employees (see "Information About Rollway -- Director/Officer
Indemnification"), the status of Rollway's accounts payable and the potential
liability of Rollway in connection with a Workers' Compensation claim. After
extensive negotiations, the parties agreed to a settlement of all of these
issues. The settlement resulted in a reduction in the preliminary
consideration to be received by the holders of Rollway's Common Stock to $8.27
million. The reduced consideration represented a compromise between Rollway's
and Emerson's estimates of the surviving company's contingent liabilities for
these matters after the Merger.
Throughout January 1996 the parties negotiated the terms and conditions of
the Merger Agreement, while Emerson continued its due diligence examination of
Rollway's international operations. The majority of the negotiations centered
on the scope of Rollway's representations and warranties (see "Certain
Provisions of the Merger Agreement -- Representations and Warranties") and the
amount of the Merger Consideration to be held in escrow. After considerable
negotiation, the parties agreed that Emerson Common Stock with a total value of
$1.5 million would be held in escrow to secure Rollway's obligations in the
event of a breach by Rollway of its representations and warranties. Emerson's
primary concern at the time was Rollway's inventories, which had not been the
recent subject of a complete physical inventory. Rollway had instead been
relying on statistical sampling.
<PAGE> 56
On February 8, 1996, Rollway's Board of Directors tentatively approved the
execution of the Merger Agreement subject to the Board's review of certain
final exhibits. This approval followed a presentation by MPI. During the
presentation, MPI reviewed its February 2, 1996 written opinion to the Rollway
Board of Directors, wherein MPI concluded that the terms and conditions of the
Merger and the Preferred Terms Amendment were fair from a financial point of
view to the holders of the Rollway Common Shares and the Rollway Preferred
Shares. MPI also made a detailed presentation regarding the valuation
methodologies used by MPI in reaching its conclusion. See "-- Fairness
Opinion."
Emerson concluded its international due diligence examination in March
1996. During this process, Emerson noted that Rollway had not filed a
required 1994 foreign tax report listing Rollway's commission payments to
certain of its European distributors, thus potentially exposing Rollway to
fines of approximately $1.1 million until January 1, 1997. Emerson therefore
requested an additional escrow of $1 million as security in the event a claim
is made regarding the late filing. This portion of the escrow would be
released to the former holders of the Rollway Common Stock on January 3, 1997.
This amount approximated Emerson's estimate of the potential exposure ($1.1
million) if a late filing claim was successfully asserted. Rollway's Board of
Directors agreed and, on March 28, 1996, again approved the Merger Agreement.
See "-- Escrow and Indemnity" and Sections 1.13 and 7.7 of the Merger
Agreement, which is attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Exhibit A.
This approval followed MPI's written confirmation that its prior opinion as to
the fairness of the transactions contemplated with Emerson was still valid.
Emerson and Rollway signed the Merger Agreement on April 1, 1996. The
Merger Agreement was amended on April 11, 1996: (a) to provide that either
party can terminate it if the Merger is not consummated by October 8, 1996,
rather than July 31, 1996, and (b) to add Closing Book Value Benchmarks (as
hereinafter defined) for the fiscal months of August and September. The Merger
Agreement was further amended on .........., 1996 to provide: ........... The
Merger Agreement is the result of extensive arms' length negotiations.
Emerson's Reasons for the Merger
The positive factors considered by Emerson in entering into the Merger
Agreement were the acquisition of Rollway's cylindrical and thrust bearing
products, the prospects, assets, obligations and potential earnings of Rollway,
the synergism which should result from the combination of Rollway and Emerson's
Power Transmission subsidiary, the ability of Emerson to provide Rollway with a
much stronger sales and marketing organization, Emerson's ability to upgrade
Rollway's equipment and Emerson's belief that combining Rollway with Emerson's
existing bearing operations will enhance the presence of both companies in the
bearing market, thereby enabling them to offer their customers a broader and
more varied array of products. Emerson also believes that Rollway's
international division offers good growth potential. In addition, Emerson
considered that Rollway's small size, its need to upgrade its plants and
equipment, its working capital constraints, its narrow product lines and its
lack of purchasing leverage with its material suppliers were all handicapping
Rollway's potential earnings. With Emerson's substantially greater resources,
Emerson believes it can cure these problems.
In view of the wide variety of the factors described above which were
considered by Emerson, Emerson did not find it practicable to quantify or
<PAGE> 57
otherwise attempt to establish the relative importance of the various factors
that it considered when determining to enter into the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement was unanimously approved by all members of Emerson's
Board of Directors present at the board meeting held on October 3, 1995.
Rollway's Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of Rollway's Board of
Directors
As a result of significant operating losses, in 1992, the Board of
Directors of Rollway began considering the various alternatives available to
Rollway (e.g., remaining independent, seeking a strategic partner, selling to
or merging with a third party). Three potential acquisition/partner candidates
were identified.
Over the course of the next two years, Rollway was in contact with each of
these candidates, including Emerson. For example, in 1993 Rollway signed a
confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement with one of the candidates. After
several visits, the candidate expressed a casual interest in acquiring Rollway
but was unwilling to put forth a definitive offer. Shortly thereafter, the
discussions stopped.
Similarly, in June 1994, Rollway received an inquiry from a potential
acquiror expressing a possible interest in Rollway. This potential acquiror
had made previous overtures dating back to the 1980's. Interest initially was
expressed in the range of $4.00 to $5.00 per Rollway Common Share. Later, in
the fall of 1994, discussions intensified. Rollway's management was convinced
that the candidate was valuing Rollway without giving due consideration to the
improvement in Rollway's financial and business condition. The candidate was
unconvinced and negotiations languished through early 1995.
In April 1995, the discussion process was revived, and in May a letter of
intent was executed. The letter contemplated the acquisition of Rollway's
Common Stock at a cash price of $12.00 per share. The transaction was subject
to a number of conditions, including financing of the purchase price and a
satisfactory due diligence examination of Rollway.
In early July 1995, the candidate approached Rollway seeking a price
reduction of over 50%. The reduction was due primarily to the candidate's
concerns about the salability of Rollway's inventories and the perceived
uncertainty associated with LRNV. The proposed reduced purchase price was
totally unsatisfactory to Rollway's Board of Directors and was rejected. On
July 7, 1995, the offer was formally withdrawn by the candidate.
Over the course of the next several months, extensive negotiations took
place between Rollway and Emerson. During this period the parties discussed at
length a multitude of issues including the valuation of Rollway and the nature
of Rollway's European operation. These discussions precipitated Emerson's
August 1995 offer described above. See "-- Background of the Merger."
In January and February 1996, the Board of Directors of Rollway held
several special meetings to consider the initial drafts of the Merger Agreement
and the issues raised by Emerson as a result of its due diligence. At the
special meetings, the Rollway Board of Directors considered in detail the terms
and conditions of the proposed Merger and the Preferred Terms Amendment.
<PAGE> 58
On March 21 and March 28, 1996, the Rollway Board of Directors met again in
special session to consider the final Merger Agreement and the terms of the
proposed Merger and Preferred Terms Amendment. See "--Background of the
Merger." After giving the matter extensive consideration, the Board of
Directors of Rollway unanimously approved each of the proposals.
In reaching its conclusions, the Board of Directors of Rollway considered
the following principal factors:
1. Operating History and Future Prospects. Over the past two years,
Rollway has demonstrated a return to profitability. For the fiscal year ending
November 27, 1994, Rollway had net income of $101,588. For the year ended
December 3, 1995, its net income was $707,074.
Unfortunately, this recent success has not been sufficient to offset
Rollway's losses over the past several years. These losses have been
substantial - i.e., $146,132, $1,167,091 and $926,103 for fiscal years ending
November 28, 1993, November 29, 1992 and December 1, 1991, respectively, As a
result, it has been extremely difficult for Rollway to finance any form of long
term growth. It has also made it difficult for Rollway to follow the movement
in the bearing industry of providing a broader product line. In management's
opinion, smaller providers, such as Rollway, are faced with a more difficult
challenge of satisfying customers' total product requirements.
Although the Directors of Rollway are hopeful that Rollway's recent
profitable performance can be sustained, they do not believe that this
improvement will be sufficient to allow Rollway to grow competitively without a
significant infusion of capital.
2. Dividend Paying History. Rollway has never paid a cash dividend on
its Common Stock. In recent years, Rollway has been in arrears on its
Preferred Stock dividends. The lack of dividend paying ability has been due,
in part, to the restrictions contained in certain debt arrangements to which
Rollway is a party. It has also been due, in part, to Rollway's inability to
generate surplus operating funds. Based on recent operating results and
Rollway's cash requirements, the Directors do not believe that dividends can be
paid on Rollway's Common Stock in the foreseeable future if Rollway remains
independently owned.
3. Shareholder Liquidity. Rollway's Common Stock is not traded on any
national securities exchange. As a result, trading has been extremely limited.
The effect of this inactivity has been a significant lack of shareholder
liquidity. The Merger offers Rollway shareholders the opportunity to receive
Emerson Common Stock which is listed on a national securities exchange and
actively traded.
4. Merger Consideration. The total Merger Consideration will be
approximately $8,270,000, subject to adjustment as provided in the Merger
Agreement (see "--Merger Consideration"), and will be divided on a pro rata
basis among the holders of Rollway Common Stock. For example, if the closing
of the Merger had occurred on June ....., 1996, the Merger Consideration would
have been adjusted downward by approximately $.......... pursuant to the post-
closing adjustment provisions set forth in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger
Agreement. This would have resulted in a Merger Consideration of approximately
$.......... (or approximately $.......... per share of Rollway Common Stock),
subject to the terms of the Escrow Agreement. See "-- Merger Consideration"
and "-- Escrow and Indemnity." (The foregoing example is based upon Rollway's
internal, unaudited balance sheet for the fiscal month ended June ....., 1996,
<PAGE> 59
which has not been subjected to a year-end accounting audit or the specific
audit provisions prescribed in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement.
Accordingly, changes in Rollway's financial condition between June ....., 1996
and the Closing Date, as well as any adjustments necessitated by the Closing
Date audit contemplated by the Merger Agreement, may have a material effect on
the amount of the Merger Consideration.) If the Preferred Terms Amendment is
approved, each share of Rollway Preferred Stock will receive a fraction of a
share of Emerson Common Stock equal in value to $20.00 and an amount in cash
equal to the amount of accrued dividends owed on such Share at the Effective
Time. Thus the total dollar value of Emerson Common Stock to be received in
the Merger in exchange for Rollway Preferred Stock will be $1,873,840.
The Directors believe that the Merger Consideration is fair. This belief
is based on the Directors' assessment of Rollway's future prospects and on
previous offers to acquire Rollway. It is also based on the fairness opinion
of Rollway's valuation advisor, MPI, discussed below (see "--Fairness
Opinion").
In the opinion of Rollway's Board of Directors, each of the above factors
supported a determination that the transactions contemplated with Emerson are
in the best interest of Rollway's Common and Preferred Shareholders. Given the
extensive nature of the factors discussed above, the Rollway Board did not
attempt to assign any individual weight to each factor. In total, however, the
Board of Directors believe that the Merger and the Preferred Terms Amendment
present the best opportunity for Rollway to succeed in the future and for
Rollway's shareholders to achieve an acceptable return on their investment.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROLLWAY HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY AS BEING FAIR AND IN THE
BEST INTEREST OF ROLLWAY, ITS SHAREHOLDERS AND THE HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY OPTIONS.
THE ROLLWAY BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY
COMMON STOCK APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
THEREBY AND THAT HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK AND HOLDERS OF ROLLWAY
PREFERRED STOCK APPROVE THE PREFERRED TERMS AMENDMENT.
Fairness Opinion
On February 2, 1996, MPI delivered its written opinion to the Board of
Directors of Rollway that the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement
are fair from a financial point of view to the holders of the Rollway Common
Shares and the Rollway Preferred Shares. At the February 8, 1996 special
meeting of the Rollway Board, MPI made a detailed presentation of the basis of
its opinion and confirmed its February 2, 1996 opinion. This opinion was again
confirmed on March 25, 1996. MPI did not participate in the determination or
negotiation of the amount of the Merger Consideration to be received by Rollway
shareholders.
In connection with rendering its opinion, MPI: (i) considered the terms
and conditions of the proposed Merger and Preferred Terms Amendment; (ii)
reviewed and analyzed financial data regarding Rollway, including its audited
and unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended
approximately November 30, 1985 through 1995; (iii) reviewed and analyzed the
other relevant financial and operating data supplied by Rollway; (iv) discussed
past and current operations, financial condition and future prospects of
Rollway with members of its senior management; (v) prepared a comparative
analysis of Rollway and certain publicly held companies deemed by MPI to be
reasonably similar to Rollway with respect to financial and operating results
<PAGE> 60
and investment characteristics; (vi) compared the financial terms of the Merger
with the financial terms of certain other mergers and acquisitions which MPI
deemed relevant; (vii) reviewed the premiums in value paid for control in
certain recent business combinations of companies in a variety of industries;
(viii) prepared a discounted net cash flow analysis; and (ix) reviewed
historical prices and trading activity of Rollway Common Stock.
The following is a summary of certain of the financial analyses used by MPI
in connection with providing its written opinion to the Board of Directors of
Rollway on February 2, 1996, which analyses were the subject of the detailed
presentation to the Rollway Board on February 8, 1996:
Comparative Analysis. As part of its analysis, MPI compared certain
financial information of Rollway with that of a group of selected publicly
traded bearings manufacturers and distributors, including Bearings, Inc.,
Brenco, Inc., Federal-Mogul Corporation, Kaydon Corporation, NN Ball & Roller,
Inc., Sinter Metals, Inc., and The Timken Company. MPI prepared a quantitative
and qualitative analysis of Rollway versus the publicly traded companies in
respect to trends of net sales and earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT"),
operating and profitability ratios, and balance sheet ratios. MPI calculated
various financial multiples and ratios for the publicly traded companies, after
determining the total market value of the total invested capital of each
selected company, using trading prices as of February 2, 1996. The multiples
were as follows: (1) market value times latest year EBIT ratios ranged from 5.4
times to 18.2 times; (2) market value times latest year earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") ratios ranged from
4.5 times to 16.0 times; (3) market value times five year average EBIT ratios
ranged from 9.3 times to 26.6 times; (4) market value times five year average
EBITDA ratios ranged from 7.3 times to 22.7 times; (5) market value times five
year weighted average EBIT ratios ranged from 7.6 times to 22.9 times; and (6)
market value times five year weighted average EBITDA ratios ranged from 6.1
times to 19.9 times.
MPI then considered various qualitative and quantitative differences
between the selected companies and Rollway, including Rollway's below average
long term sales and EBIT growth and its leveraged financial condition.
Discounted Net Cash Flow Analysis. MPI performed a discounted net cash
flow analysis of Rollway based on certain financial projections prepared by the
management of Rollway for the fiscal years ended 1996 through 1999. MPI
discounted the projected free cash flows of Rollway over the forecast period at
a range of discount rates of from 15.0% to 20.0%, representing an estimated
range of the weighted average cost of capital for Rollway. The sum of the
present values of such free cash flows for Rollway was then added to the
present value of Rollway's terminal value discounted to a present value
equivalent using the aforementioned range of discount rates.
Analysis of Purchase Price. MPI prepared a financial analysis of the
Merger and calculated the aggregate consideration and various financial
multiples based upon the approximate cash consideration of $8,270,000, subject
to adjustment as set forth in the Merger Agreement. The multiples were as
follows: (1) latest year EBIT - 5.5 times; (2) latest year EBITDA - 4.6 times;
(3) five year average EBIT - 15.2 times; (4) five year average EBITDA - 10.6
times; (5) five year weighted average EBIT - 11.0 times; and (6) five year
weighted average EBITDA - 8.3 times.
Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis. MPI conducted a search for mergers and
acquisitions in the bearings industry over the two year period preceding the
<PAGE> 61
valuation date. Rexnord Corporation, whose diversified product line
importantly included consumable replacement parts such as bearings, was
acquired in 1994 and sold for 9.6 times latest year EBIT and 8.1 times latest
year EBITDA. In view of the significant qualitative and quantitative
differences between Rollway and Rexnord Corporation, MPI viewed this
transaction as a reasonable confirmation of the implicit multiples in the
Merger.
Historical Stock Trading Analysis. MPI reviewed and analyzed the reported
trading prices and activity for the Common Stock of Rollway since 1989 and
determined that trading in Rollway Common Stock has been extremely limited.
Rollway Common Shares traded in brokered and other private transactions at
prices ranging between $1.00 and $12.00 during the period January 13, 1995
through February 29, 1996. From 1989 through 1994, shares of Rollway Common
Stock traded between $0.25 and $4.25 per share.
Pursuant to confirming its opinion on March 25, 1996, MPI substantially
updated its analyses as described hereinabove. MPI had at its disposal the
final 1995 fiscal year end audited financial statements of Rollway, which
results were reflected in the update, as well as more current information for
the same group of selected publicly traded companies. Revised financial and
market multiples for the public companies were determined as follows: (1)
market value times latest year EBIT ratios ranged from 6.8 times to 19.5 times;
(2) market value times latest EBITDA ratios ranged from 5.5 times to 17.2
times; (3) market value times five year average EBIT ratios ranged from 11.6
times to 28.5 times; (4) market value times five year average EBITDA ratios
ranged from 8.4 times to 24.4 times; (5) market value times five year weighted
average EBIT ratios ranged from 9.6 times to 24.6 times and (6) market value
times five year weighted average EBITDA ratios ranged from 7.4 times to 21.3
times. There were no material changes in the projected financial results of
Rollway and, therefore, the discounted net cash flow analysis was unchanged.
There were no interim acquisitions of companies primarily engaged in the
manufacture and distribution of bearings. Based upon these analyses, MPI
concluded that the purchase price was fair from a financial point of view.
A copy of MPI's opinion is attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as
Exhibit B and sets forth the procedures followed, the matters considered and
the limitations on the scope of review undertaken by MPI. In preparing its
opinion, MPI relied, without independent verification, on the accuracy and
completeness of all financial and other information that was publicly available
or furnished by Rollway. MPI did not make any independent valuation or
appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities of Rollway.
Shareholders of Rollway should note that the preparation of a fairness
opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial
analysis or summary description. Selecting portions of the analysis or of the
summary set forth above, without considering the analysis as a whole, could
create an incomplete view of the processes underlying MPI's opinion. In
arriving at its fairness determination, MPI considered the results of all such
analyses. No company or transaction used as a comparison in the analyses is
identical to Rollway or the contemplated transaction. The analyses were
prepared solely for the purpose of MPI providing its opinion to the Board of
Directors of Rollway as to the fairness of the Merger and the Preferred Terms
Amendment from a financial point of view, and do not purport to be appraisals
or necessarily reflect the prices at which Rollway or its securities actually
may be sold. As described above, certain of the analyses performed by MPI
relied on estimates of future financial performance provided by the management
of Rollway. Analyses based on forecasts of future results are not necessarily
<PAGE> 62
indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less
favorable than suggested by such analyses. As described above, MPI's opinion
and presentation to the Board of Directors of Rollway was one of the several
factors taken into consideration by the Board of Directors of Rollway in making
its determination to approve the Merger. The foregoing summary does not
purport to be a complete written description of the analyses performed by MPI
and is qualified by reference to the written opinion of MPI as set forth in
Exhibit B hereto, which Rollway Shareholders are urged to read in its entirety.
In arriving at its fairness determination, MPI considered the results of all of
its analysis and did not assign relative weights thereto.
MPI is being paid a fee of $72,500 for acting as a financial advisor and
rendering its opinion to Rollway. In addition, Rollway has agreed to reimburse
MPI for out-of-pocket expenses and to indemnify MPI and certain persons against
certain liabilities under the federal securities laws arising out of its
engagement. MPI's fee is not contingent upon the successful consummation of
the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Effective Time; Closing Date
If the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
approved by shareholders holding at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares
of Rollway Common Stock, the Merger will be consummated and effected at the
time a Certificate of Merger is filed with the Secretary of State of New York
and a Certificate of Merger is filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware.
The time at which the Merger becomes effective is referred to herein as the
"Effective Time." The Merger Agreement provides that Emerson and Rollway will
cause Certificates of Merger to be filed and recorded on the day following the
Rollway Special Meeting in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
NYBCL and the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Merger Agreement may be
terminated prior to the Effective Time by either Emerson or Rollway in certain
circumstances, whether before or after the approval of the Merger Agreement by
the shareholders of Rollway. See "Certain Provisions of the Merger Agreement
- -- Termination." The closing of the Merger will be deemed to have occurred on
the last day of the fiscal month following the Rollway Special Meeting. The
day on which the Closing occurs is referred to herein as the "Closing Date."
Form of the Merger
If (i) the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
approved by holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Rollway
Common Stock, and (ii) all other conditions to the Merger are satisfied or
waived (see "Certain Provisions of the Merger -- Conditions to the Consummation
of the Merger"), Emersub will be merged with and into Rollway, with Rollway as
the Surviving Corporation, which will thereupon become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Emerson.
Merger Consideration
At the Effective Time of the Merger, holders of Rollway Common Shares will
have the right to receive Emerson Common Shares, subject to an escrow
arrangement (see "-- Escrow and Indemnity" below) and a holdback arrangement
(see "--Holdback" below). Each holder of Rollway Common Shares will have the
right to receive a portion of the Merger Consideration, payable in Emerson
Common Shares valued at the Emerson Share Value, equal to the Rollway Common
<PAGE> 63
Share Price multiplied by the number of Rollway Common Shares held by that
holder. Emerson shall aggregate the Emerson Common Stock issuable to any
person, and since fractional Emerson shares will not be issued, such person
shall receive cash in lieu of fractional shares remaining following the
aggregation. The "Rollway Common Share Price" will be based on an aggregate
purchase price for all of the Rollway Common Shares equal to approximately
$8,270,000, subject to adjustment up or down as described below (as previously
defined, the "Merger Consideration"), divided by the number of Rollway Common
Shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis at the Effective Time. For
example, if the Closing had occurred on June ..... 1996, the Merger
Consideration would have been adjusted downward by approximately $..........
pursuant to the closing net worth provisions set forth in Section 1.9 of the
Merger Agreement and would have been adjusted upward by approximately
$.......... pursuant to the closing pension liability provisions set forth in
Section 1.10 of the Merger Agreement. This would have resulted in a Merger
Consideration of approximately $.......... (or approximately $.......... per
share of Rollway Common Stock, assuming .......... shares of Rollway Common
Stock outstanding), subject to the terms of the Escrow Agreement described
herein. See "-- Escrow and Indemnity." The foregoing example is based upon
Rollway's internal, unaudited balance sheet for the fiscal month ended
June ....., 1996, which has not been subjected to a year-end accounting audit
or the specific audit provisions prescribed in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the
Merger Agreement. Accordingly, changes in Rollway's financial condition
between June ....., 1996 and the Closing Date, as well as any adjustments
necessitated by the Closing Date audit contemplated by the Merger Agreement,
may have a material effect on the amount of the Merger Consideration.
<PAGE> 64
The "Emerson Share Value" will equal the average closing price of an
Emerson Common Share for the five consecutive trading days ending on the fifth
business day prior to .........., 1996, the date of the Rollway Special
Meeting, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, New York Stock Exchange
Composite Transactions. The following table illustrates the number of shares
of Emerson Common Stock which would be issued in payment of the Merger
Consideration, depending on what the Emerson Share Value is:
Number of shares of
Emerson Common Stock Issued
based on an estimated
Merger Consideration
Emerson Share Value of $..........
- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
$ 70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
<PAGE> 65
The Merger Consideration ultimately payable to the former holders of
Rollway Common Shares will equal $8,269,936 minus the Closing Book Value
Adjustment (as hereinafter defined), if any, and plus or minus the Pension
Liability Adjustment (as hereinafter defined), if any. The "Closing Book Value
Adjustment" shall equal the amount, if any, by which the Closing Book Value
Benchmark (as hereinafter defined) exceeds the actual Rollway Closing Book
Value (as hereinafter defined). The "Closing Book Value Benchmark" shall equal
one of the following amounts, depending upon when the Closing Date occurs:
Then the Closing Book Value
If the Closing Date Is Between Benchmark Will Be
- -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
July 9 and August 5 $9.338 million
August 6 and September 9 $9.508 million
September 10 and October 7 $9.679 million
The amounts set forth above were provided by Rollway's management to
Emerson as estimates of the book value of Rollway as of the ends of the months
indicated, calculated in the same manner as the Rollway Closing Book Value will
be calculated. These estimates were prepared by Rollway's management for
internal purposes only, and were not prepared with a view to public disclosure
or compliance with published guidelines of the Commission or guidelines
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for the
preparation and presentation of financial forecasts. Rollway does not as a
matter of course make public its internal estimates.
The starting point in preparing the above estimates was Rollway's actual
September 1995 balance sheet. Rollway's management then made a number of
assumptions regarding Rollway's projected performance. These assumptions
included that revenues would remain at a constant level with no growth, that
the backlog would increase by approximately 1%, that cost of goods sold would
increase approximately 1% and that selling, general and administrative expenses
would increase approximately 2%. As of June ....., 1996, Rollway's performance
was approximately .....% below its projections for the fiscal month ending on
such date (approximately a $.......... reduction per Rollway Common Share)
primarily as a results of costs and expenses associated with the transactions
contemplated in the Merger Agreement. Management of Rollway does not
anticipate that the shortfall will be lessened significantly prior to the
Effective Time.
These estimates were of necessity based on numerous complex assumptions
that are inherently subject to significant economic and competitive
uncertainties, which are difficult to predict and in many cases are beyond
Rollway's control. Some or all of such assumptions may not be realized. Given
the uncertainties inherent in the process of making such estimates, there can
be no assurance that the projected results will be achieved, thereby avoiding a
Closing Book Value Adjustment or that any of the projected results would be
achieved were Rollway to remain an independent company. Actual results for
projected periods may be significantly higher or lower than the projected
results. The fact that the estimates were shared by Rollway with Emerson
should not be regarded as an indication that Rollway or Emerson considers the
estimates to be an accurate prediction of future events. Such estimates are
speculative and should not be regarded as representations by Rollway or Emerson
that such projected results will be achieved. Rollway does not intend to
update or otherwise revise these estimates prior to consummation of the Merger.
<PAGE> 66
The "Rollway Closing Book Value" will be determined based on a balance
sheet of Rollway as of the Closing Date (the "Closing Balance Sheet") to be
prepared by the Surviving Corporation during the 60 days following the
Effective Time. The Closing Balance Sheet will be prepared based on Rollway's
historical accounting practices to the extent such practices are in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied (except for
the adjustments to be made to the Closing Balance Sheet as described in the
next paragraph). The Closing Balance Sheet will include accruals for Closing
Fees (as hereinafter defined) payable by Rollway but not actually paid by
Rollway as of the Closing Date. Any disputes relating to the preparation of
the Closing Balance Sheet may be resolved on behalf of the Rollway shareholders
by the Common Shareholders' Representative. See "--Escrow and Indemnity" and
"--Common Shareholders' Representative." Expenses incurred by the Common
Shareholders' Representative in any such disputes will be reimbursed from the
Holdback. See "--Holdback." The holders of Rollway Common Stock shall
automatically be deemed to have waived any right or cause of action for any
action taken or omitted from being taken by the Common Shareholders'
Representative absent a showing of gross error or fraud.
For purposes of calculating the Closing Book Value, the following
principles shall apply: (i) there will be no adjustment for currency
translation, (ii) the line items for "intangible pension asset," "pension
accrual" and "long term pension liability" will be reversed, (iii) up to
$236,000 of the legal fees and expenses of the former Rollway employees Wiehl,
Connor and Cramp, if paid by Rollway prior to the Closing Date, will be added
to assets on the Closing Balance Sheet, or, if such legal fees and expenses are
accrued on the books of Rollway as a liability on the Closing Date, then such
accrual (up to $236,000) will be disregarded in calculating the liabilities of
Rollway on the Closing Balance Sheet, (iv) the costs and expenses associated
with the remediation (but not the costs or expenses of Rollway in connection
with the discovery or assessment thereof) of the environmental issues described
on Schedule 1.16 to the Merger Agreement, if approved in writing by Emerson in
advance and paid by Rollway prior to the Closing Date, will be added to the
Closing Balance Sheet, or if such costs and expenses are accrued on the books
of Rollway as a liability on the Closing Date, then such accruals will be
disregarded in calculating the liabilities of Rollway on the Closing Balance
Sheet, (v) deferred taxes will be fixed at zero, (vi) severance payments, if
any, triggered by the Merger made prior to the Closing Date to Stephen Bregande
or Edmund Babiarz pursuant to their respective employment agreements with
Rollway will be added to the Closing Balance Sheet, or, if such payments are
accrued on the books of Rollway as a liability on the Closing Date, such
accruals will be disregarded in calculating the liabilities of Rollway on the
Closing Balance Sheet, and (vii) an amount equal to 40% of the taxable gain
realized by Rollway as a result of the transfer of life insurance policies to
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr. will be subtracted from the Rollway Closing Book
Value. The foregoing adjustments are illustrated on Schedule 1.9 to the Merger
Agreement (a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus as
part of Exhibit A). The Merger Agreement provides that in the event of a
conflict between the provision and the Merger Agreement that describes these
adjustments and Schedule 1.9 to the Merger Agreement, Schedule 1.9 will govern.
Additionally, in an effort to resolve certain specified items of concern which
are expressly stated in the Merger Agreement regarding Rollway, the parties to
the Merger Agreement have agreed to a financial settlement with respect to such
items which has been reflected in the Merger Consideration. Accordingly, the
parties have agreed in the Merger Agreement that the Merger Consideration shall
not be further reduced nor shall any claim for indemnification be made with
respect to any of these specified items regardless of any representations or
warranties of Rollway contained in the Merger Agreement. If the Closing had
<PAGE> 67
occurred on June ....., 1996, the Closing Book Value would have been
$.........., which would have caused a reduction in the Merger Consideration of
$........... The foregoing example is based upon Rollway's internal, unaudited
balance sheet for the fiscal month ended June ....., 1996, which has not been
subjected to a year-end accounting audit or the specific audit provisions
prescribed in Sections 1.9 and 1.10 of the Merger Agreement. Accordingly,
changes in Rollway's financial condition between June ....., 1996 and the
Closing Date, as well as any adjustments necessitated by the Closing Date audit
contemplated by the Merger Agreement, may have a material effect on the amount
of the Merger Consideration.
Concurrent with the delivery of the Closing Balance Sheet, Emerson will
deliver to the Common Shareholders' Representative a calculation of the
"Rollway Closing Pension Liability," which shall be equal the underfunded
pension liability of Rollway as of the Closing Date, defined as the amount by
which the projected benefit obligation of the Rollway pension plans exceeds the
fair market value of plan assets, calculated using the following assumptions:
Discount rate: 8.00%
Mortality: 1983 GAM
Termination: 125% of Sarason's T-5
Retirement: Age Rate
---------- ----------
55-61 2%
62 15%
63 10%
64 10%
65 100%
The "Pension Liability Adjustment" will equal the amount by which the Rollway
Closing Pension Liability is greater than or less than $1,953,000. If the
Closing had occurred on June ....., 1996, the Pension Liability Adjustment
would have been $.........., which would have increased the Merger
Consideration by $...........
For purposes of issuing Emerson Common Stock to shareholders of Rollway who
surrender their certificates formerly representing Rollway Common Shares after
the Effective Time but prior to the final determination of the Merger
Consideration, the consideration initially payable to such shareholders will be
calculated based on the balance sheet of Rollway as of the month-end
immediately preceding the Closing Date (which may in fact be the Closing Date)
(the "Pre-Closing Balance Sheet"). Such initial amount of consideration is
referred to herein as the "Estimated Merger Consideration" and is subject to an
Escrow and Holdback. See "-- Escrow and Indemnity" and "--Holdback."
Holdback
Emerson Common Shares valued at the Emerson Share Value worth $1,000,000,
the "Holdback," shall be withheld from the payment of the Estimated Merger
Consideration as security for any adjustments to the Estimated Merger
Consideration based upon the Closing Balance Sheet, determination of the
Rollway Closing Pension Liability, and to fund any reasonable expenses incurred
by the Common Shareholders' Representative in resolving any dispute relating to
the Closing Balance Sheet and/or the determination of the Rollway Closing
Pension Liability (the "Representative's Expenses"). After the Merger
Consideration has been finally determined, and if it is greater than the
<PAGE> 68
Estimated Merger Consideration (less the Holdback, net of the Representative's
Expenses, if any (the "Net Holdback")), such excess shall be promptly issued to
the former holders of Rollway Common Shares on a pro rata basis in proportion
to each such holder's portion of the Merger Consideration. If the Estimated
Merger Consideration (less the Net Holdback) is greater than the Merger
Consideration, Emerson shall be entitled to retain the Holdback and withdraw
from the Escrow Funds the amount, if any, by which the Estimated Merger
Consideration (less the Net Holdback) exceeds the Merger Consideration. To the
extent the Escrow Funds are insufficient to reimburse Emerson for the amount by
which the Estimated Merger Consideration (less the Net Holdback) exceeds the
Merger Consideration, each former holder of shares of Rollway Common Stock
shall be obligated to return to Emerson such holder's pro rata portion of such
excess consideration by either: (a) tendering to Emerson his or her
certificate representing Emerson Shares issued in the Merger in exchange for
new certificates representing the number of Emerson Shares to which such holder
is actually entitled; or (b) paying Emerson cash equal to such holder's pro
rata portion of such excess consideration.
Escrow and Indemnity
Emerson Common Shares valued at the Emerson Share Value worth $2,600,000,
the "Escrow Deposit," will be held in Escrow under an Escrow Agreement to be
executed in connection with the closing of the Merger (Exhibit 1.13 to the
Merger Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, the "Escrow Agreement"). The
Escrow Deposit shall be funded from the Merger Consideration otherwise payable
to the holders of Rollway Common Shares. The Indemnity Escrow Funds
($2,500,000 of the Escrow Deposit) will be held as security to compensate
Emerson, the Surviving Corporation and their affiliates if they suffer losses:
(a) as a result of a breach of any of Rollway's representations,
warranties or covenants in the Merger Agreement (see "Certain Provisions of the
Merger Agreement -- Rollway's Representations and Warranties");
(b) as a result of the assertion against Emerson or the Surviving
Corporation of any loss or liability, including Rollway's or the Surviving
Corporation's liability for its own taxes or its liability, if any, for the
taxes of others (for example, by reason of transferee liability or application
of Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6), including, but not limited to, any
former tax affiliate of Rollway, or damage or reasonable expense (including but
not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) payable with respect to
taxes claimed or assessed against Rollway or the Surviving Corporation (i) for
any taxable period ending on or before the Closing Date or (ii) for any taxable
period resulting from a breach of any of Rollway's tax-related representations
or warranties contained in Section 2.9 of the Merger Agreement (excluding those
taxes which are properly accrued as liabilities on the Closing Balance Sheet);
(c) resulting from or arising out of any agreement or arrangement
regarding indemnification of MPI;
(d) resulting from or arising out of LRNV's commission payment
practices; and
(e) resulting from or arising out of the last two items described
above under "Information About Rollway -- Legal Proceedings and Administrative
Matters."
<PAGE> 69
The foregoing claims and losses for which Emerson is entitled to be indemnified
are referred to herein as the "Indemnifiable Claims." Emerson may not,
however, withdraw Escrow Funds until undisputed Indemnifiable Claims exceed
$100,000 in the aggregate, at which point Emerson will be entitled to withdraw
Escrow Funds in payment of all undisputed Indemnifiable Claims, including the
first $100,000 worth of Indemnifiable Claims. Indemnifiable Claims arising out
of Rollway's agreement to indemnify MPI are not subject to such $100,000
threshold. The Representative Escrow Funds ($100,000 of the Escrow Deposit)
will be held to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Common
Shareholders' Representative incurred in resolving any dispute relating to
Indemnifiable Claims. The Escrow Agreement shall be executed by Emerson, the
Common Shareholders' Representative, and Boatmen's Trust Company of St. Louis
(the "Escrow Agent").
The Escrow Agent will distribute the Escrow Deposit and all income earned
thereon to the former holders of the Rollway Common Stock in accordance with
the Escrow Agreement as follows:
(a) on January 3, 1997, the Escrow Agent will distribute a portion of
the Indemnity Escrow Funds (valued at the Emerson Share Value) equal to the
lesser of (i) $1,000,000, together with all income earned thereon, less any
amounts distributed to Emerson under the Escrow Agreement in respect of claims
arising from or relating to the commission payment practices of LRNV, or (ii)
the Indemnity Escrow Funds, to the former holders of the Rollway Common Stock;
and
(b) eighteen months after the Closing Date, the Escrow Agent will
distribute the balance of the Indemnity Escrow Funds and the Representative
Escrow Funds to the former holders of the Rollway Common Stock;
except in each case to the extent some or all of such Escrow Funds have been
distributed to Emerson or to the Common Shareholders' Representative pursuant
to the terms of the Escrow Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Emerson discovers, prior to
January 1, 1997, reasonably reliable evidence that, in connection with the
commission payment practices of LRNV, LRNV and/or Rollway committed acts that
justify or might justify an extension to 5 years of the statute of limitations
applicable to any tax-reporting or tax-payment statute applicable to such
commission payment practices, the Escrow Agent will not make the distribution
described in paragraph (a) above and will, upon the expiration of eighteen
months after the Closing Date, retain from the distribution described in
paragraph (b) above Emerson Shares (valued at the Emerson Share Value) equal to
the lesser of (i) $1,000,000, together with all income earned thereon, less any
amounts distributed to Emerson under the Escrow Agreement in respect of claims
arising from or relating to the commission payment practices of LRNV, or (ii)
the Escrow Funds, until January 4, 1999, at which time such retained Escrow
Funds, to the extent not distributed to Emerson, shall be distributed to the
former holders of the Rollway Common Stock pursuant to the Escrow Agreement.
See Section 1.13 of the Merger Agreement, which is attached to this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus as Exhibit A.
TO THE EXTENT THE ESCROW FUNDS ARE INSUFFICIENT TO REIMBURSE EMERSON FOR
THE AMOUNT OF INDEMNIFIABLE CLAIMS, IF ANY, EACH FORMER HOLDER OF SHARES OF
ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK SHALL BE PERSONALLY OBLIGATED TO PROMPTLY RETURN TO
EMERSON SUCH HOLDER'S PRO RATA PORTION OF SUCH EXCESS CONSIDERATION BY
TENDERING TO EMERSON HIS OR HER CERTIFICATE REPRESENTING EMERSON SHARES ISSUED
IN THE MERGER IN EXCHANGE FOR NEW CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING THE NUMBER OF
<PAGE> 70
EMERSON SHARES TO WHICH SUCH HOLDER IS ACTUALLY ENTITLED OR BY PAYING EMERSON
THE CASH EQUIVALENT OF SUCH EXCESS CONSIDERATION. THIS INDEMNIFICATION
OBLIGATION WILL BE THE OBLIGATION OF THE FORMER ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK HOLDER WHO
SUBMITTED HIS OR HER ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE FOR EXCHANGE IN THE
MERGER AND WILL NOT AFFECT SUCH PERSON'S ABILITY TO TRANSFER THE EMERSON SHARES
RECEIVED IN THE MERGER AND SHALL BE LIMITED TO SUCH FORMER COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S
PORTION OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION. HOLDERS WHO PROPERLY CLAIM DISSENTING
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THIS INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATION.
BY SUBMITTING CERTIFICATES FORMERLY REPRESENTING ROLLWAY COMMON STOCK, EACH
SUBMITTING COMMON SHAREHOLDER WILL HAVE AGREED TO PERSONALLY INDEMNIFY EMERSON,
THE SURVIVING CORPORATION AND THEIR AFFILIATES ON DEMAND AGAINST ANY AND ALL
LOSSES TO THE EXTENT ESCROW FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE THEREFOR, EITHER BECAUSE
THE ESCROW FUNDS HAVE BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO EMERSON DUE TO THE BREACH OF ANY
OF ROLLWAY'S REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES OR COVENANTS IN THE MERGER AGREEMENT
OR THE ESCROW AGREEMENT HAS TERMINATED. SUCH PERSONAL INDEMNIFICATION
OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE SEVERAL AND ONLY IN PROPORTION TO, AND SHALL BE LIMITED
TO, EACH COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S PORTION OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION. SUCH COMMON
SHAREHOLDERS SHALL ALSO BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ANY RIGHT OF CONTRIBUTION OR
OTHER SIMILAR RIGHT AGAINST THE SURVIVING CORPORATION ARISING OUT OF ROLLWAY'S
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MERGER
AGREEMENT AND SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE AGREED TO ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE
MERGER AGREEMENT SPECIFICALLY STATED THEREIN TO BE AN OBLIGATION OR AGREEMENT
OF SUCH COMMON SHAREHOLDERS.
Common Shareholders' Representative
As described below, by submitting certificates formerly representing shares
of Rollway Common Stock for exchange in the Merger, the holders of such
certificates will have agreed to the appointment of Henry Fust, a C.P.A. in
Syracuse, New York, as the Common Shareholders' Representative. Mr. Fust is a
partner in Fust, Charles, Chambers & Harfosh LLP. The Common Shareholders'
Representative will be responsible for protecting the interests of the former
holders of Rollway Common Stock in connection with the calculation of the
Closing Balance Sheet and the Rollway Closing Pension Liability, the assertion
of any Indemnifiable Claims by Emerson and for voting all Emerson Common Shares
held in Escrow. The Merger Agreement provides that the Common Shareholders'
Representative will have full power to act on behalf of the former holders of
Rollway Common Shares in connection with such matters, that Emerson agrees to
grant the Common Shareholders' Representative and his agents access to such
books, records and other information as may be reasonably necessary to respond
to any claim for indemnification and that the former holders of the Rollway
Common Shares will have waived any right or cause of action for any action
taken or omitted from being taken by the Common Shareholders' Representative.
The Common Shareholders' Representative will be entitled to reimbursement from
the former holders of Rollway Common Shares of all reasonable expenses included
in the performance of his duties as Common Shareholders' Representative,
including, but not limited to, the right to employ financial advisors and other
agents to undertake or assist in such duties. The Common Shareholders'
Representative is expressly authorized to rely upon the advice of such
consultants and agents. Payment of the fees and expenses of the Common
Shareholders' Representative and his advisors and agents in connection with the
preparation of the Closing Balance Sheet and the determination of the Rollway
Closing Pension Liability will be made from the Holdback. Payment of such fees
and expenses in connection with the Common Shareholders' Representative's
duties in connection with any claim for indemnification by Emerson will be made
from the Representative Escrow Funds, to the extent available. The Common
<PAGE> 71
Shareholders' Representative is not required to perform any services on behalf
of the former holders of the Rollway Common Stock unless he is reasonably
assured that adequate funds are available to pay his fees and expenses.
Emerson will have no obligation to pay, and the Indemnity Escrow Funds will not
be available to pay, any such fees and expenses.
The Common Shareholders' Representative's address is: Henry Fust, C.P.A.,
Fust, Chambers, Charles & Harfosh LLP, 5786 Widewater Parkway, DeWitt, New York
13214 (telephone: (315) 446-3600). If for any reason Henry Fust is unable to
serve as the Common Shareholders' Representative, then a partner in the firm of
Fust, Chambers, Charles & Harfosh LLP chosen by such firm will serve as the
substitute Common Shareholders' Representative.
Preferred Terms Amendment
At the Rollway Special Meeting, the holders of Rollway Common Stock and
Rollway Preferred Stock will be asked to approve the Preferred Terms Amendment.
Emerson and Rollway agreed to offer the Preferred Terms Amendment to the
holders of the Rollway Preferred Stock in order to permit their shares to be
redeemed in connection with the Merger on a tax-deferred basis. If approved,
this amendment to Rollway's Certificate of Incorporation would provide that,
upon the consummation of the Merger, shares of Rollway Preferred Stock would be
converted into the right to receive from Emerson shares of Emerson Common Stock
and from Rollway an amount in cash equal to the amount of any accrued and
unpaid dividends on the shares of Rollway Preferred Stock, as described below
under "-- Preferred Stock Treatment." As of June ....., 1996, each share of
Rollway Preferred Stock had $2.50 of dividends accrued but unpaid with respect
thereto. If the Preferred Terms Amendment is approved but the Merger is not
consummated, the Preferred Terms Amendment will have no effect on the rights of
the holders of Rollway Preferred Stock. The Preferred Terms Amendment is as
follows:
Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation filed in the office of the Department of State on June 21,
1967, relating to the designations, preferences, privileges and voting
powers and restrictions and qualifications of authorized shares, is hereby
amended to insert the following new paragraph (A)(k):
(k) Upon the effective time (the "Effective Time") of the merger (the
"Merger"), if it shall occur, of the corporation with Emersub XLI, Inc., a
Delaware corporation wholly-owned by Emerson Electric Co., a Missouri
corporation ("Emerson"), each issued and outstanding share of the
corporation's $1.00 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Preferred
Stock") shall be converted into the right to receive (a) a fraction of a
share of the common stock of Emerson ("Emerson Common Stock") equal in
value to $20.00, and (b) an amount in cash equal to the amount of accrued
and unpaid dividends owed on such share of Preferred Stock at the Effective
Time. For purposes of valuing the Emerson Common Stock into which the
Preferred Stock shall be converted, each share of Emerson Common Stock
shall be valued at the "Emerson Share Value," as such term is defined in
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 1, 1996 and as amended
April 11, 1996 and .........., 1996 (the "Merger Agreement") governing the
Merger. Fractional shares of Emerson Common Stock will not be issued.
Instead, Emerson shall aggregate the shares of Emerson Common Stock
issuable to any person, and, if following such aggregation, any person
would be entitled to receive a fractional share of Emerson Common Stock but
for this paragraph, such person will, in lieu of such fractional share and
<PAGE> 72
after surrender of such person's certificate or certificates formerly
evidencing Preferred Stock, be entitled to receive an amount in cash equal
to the Emerson Share Value multiplied by the fraction of the share of
Emerson Common Stock to which such person would otherwise be entitled. The
procedure for the exchange of certificates formerly evidencing shares of
the Preferred Stock for cash and certificates evidencing Emerson Common
Stock shall be as provided in the Merger Agreement.
The approval of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding
shares of Rollway Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock is required to
approve the Preferred Terms Amendment. It is a condition to Emerson's
obligations under the Merger Agreement that Rollway shall have either
(i) obtained appropriate shareholder approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment
prior to the Effective Time or (ii) completed the redemption of all Rollway
Preferred Shares prior to the Effective Time. Therefore, if the Preferred
Terms Amendment is not appropriately approved and Rollway is unable to redeem
all of the outstanding Rollway Preferred Shares due to an inability to raise
the funds necessary for such redemption or otherwise, the Merger may not be
consummated.
Preferred Stock Treatment
Subject to approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment by the holders of a
majority of the Rollway Common Shares and of the Rollway Preferred Shares, at
the Effective Time, each holder of Rollway Preferred Shares will have the right
to receive in exchange for each Rollway Preferred Share a fraction of a share
of Emerson Common Stock equal in value to $20.00 and an amount in cash equal to
the amount of accrued and unpaid dividends owed on such Rollway Preferred Share
at the Effective Time. Emerson shall aggregate the Emerson Common Stock
issuable to any person, and, since fractional shares will not be issued, such
person shall receive cash in lieu of any fractional share remaining following
such aggregation. The cash and Emerson Common Stock payable to the holders of
the Rollway Preferred Stock will not be paid out of the Merger Consideration,
but will be in addition thereto. The Emerson Common Stock and cash payable to
former holders of Rollway Preferred Stock will not be subject to the Escrow and
Holdback described above. If approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment is not
obtained and the Merger is consummated, Rollway will redeem for $20.00 per
share (plus any accrued and unpaid dividends) in cash all of the outstanding
shares of Rollway Preferred Stock in accordance with their terms immediately
prior to the Effective Time. See "--Certain Federal Income Tax Matters--Tax
Consequences to Holders of Rollway Preferred Stock."
The Rollway Options
The Committee overseeing the Rollway Option Plan has amended the Rollway
Option Plan and each Rollway Option to provide that such options shall become
fully vested immediately prior to the Effective Time and shall be exercisable
at such time upon payment of the applicable exercise price. The holders of the
Rollway Options have agreed to exercise such options prior to the Effective
Time, subject to the consummation of the Merger. It is a condition to
Emerson's obligations under the Merger Agreement that all Rollway Options be
exercised prior to the Effective Time.
<PAGE> 73
Option Agreements
H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Ann M. Hodgkins, H. Follett Hodgkins, III,
Cynthia H. Schallmo, two Trusts Under Last Will and Testament of H. Follett
Hodgkins and Trust Under Last Will and Testament of Ruth S. Hodgkins, the Group
Shareholders, who collectively own a majority of the outstanding Rollway Common
Stock, each entered into an Option Agreement with Emerson and Rollway.
Pursuant to the Option Agreements, as amended, each of the Group Shareholders
has agreed, among other things, to vote (at the Rollway Special Meeting) such
holder's shares of Rollway Common Stock (57.5% of the outstanding Rollway
Common Stock) in favor of the Merger and the Merger Agreement and not to take
any actions which would have the effect of preventing or hindering the Merger.
In addition, each Group Shareholder will vote such holder's shares of Rollway
Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock (19.5% of the outstanding Rollway
Preferred Stock) in favor of the Preferred Terms Amendment. In addition, the
Group Shareholders have agreed in the Option Agreements to sell their shares of
Rollway Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock to Emerson in certain
situations. See "--Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
Each Option Agreement grants Emerson an irrevocable option ("Emerson
Option") to purchase from the Group Shareholders their shares of Rollway Common
Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock under certain circumstances. The Emerson
Options are exercisable, in whole but not in part: (a) between on and after
May 11, 1996 and June 14, 1996 in the event the Merger Agreement is not
executed on or before May 10, 1996 AND if on or before May 10, 1996 (i) any
person, firm, corporation, business entity or group (other than Emerson)
(collectively a "Competing Buyer") announces its intention to acquire or
acquires 5% or more of the capital stock of Rollway or (ii) any Competing Buyer
and Rollway or its Board of Directors or any member of the Group Shareholders
executes a letter of intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement
providing for a merger or other business combination involving Rollway or the
sale of a substantial portion of the assets of Rollway or the sale of any
capital stock of Rollway or any similar transaction involving Rollway (other
than to Emerson) or (iii) there is any written or oral proposal to Rollway or
any of its shareholders or its Board of Directors offering or proposing any of
the foregoing (other than any such communications from Emerson), (b) in the
event Rollway or any member of the Group Shareholders breaches the Merger
Agreement or the "no-shop agreement" dated September 18, 1995, then until
October 8, 1996 Emerson can exercise the Emerson Option, (c) in the event any
member of the Group Shareholders breaches the Merger Agreement, the Option
Agreements and any other agreement similar to the Option Agreements
(collectively, the "Group Agreements"), then until October 8, 1996 Emerson can
exercise the Emerson Option, (d) in the event on or before May 10, 1996 any
member of the Group Shareholders (i) elects for any reason to sell any Rollway
Shares to any third party (excluding transfers among the Group Shareholders
where such Rollway Shares remain subject to a Group Agreement) or (ii) grants a
proxy to vote any shares of the capital stock of Rollway to any Competing Buyer
(excluding a proxy to vote for the Merger and any proxy approved in writing by
Emerson), then until October 8, 1996 Emerson can exercise the Emerson Option,
or (e) if the Merger Agreement is executed but the Merger is not consummated,
then at any time during the 15 day period following the termination of the
Merger Agreement pursuant to its terms, unless the Merger Agreement is
terminated due solely to a breach of its terms by Emerson. If Emerson
exercises the Emerson Options, it agrees to promptly offer to all other holders
of Rollway capital stock (and options therefor) the opportunity to sell their
shares (and options) to Emerson upon comparable terms and conditions, provided
that Emerson is not obligated to consummate any purchase of Rollway capital
stock pursuant to the exercise of an Emerson Option unless it is simultaneously
<PAGE> 74
able to consummate the acquisition of all Rollway capital stock owned by the
Group Shareholders (which shall include not less than 52% of the Rollway Common
Shares on a fully diluted basis).
The price per Rollway Common Share will be determined pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, with the date of the Closing Balance Sheet, for purposes of
such determination, being as of the end of the month prior to the date of
Emerson's exercise of the Emerson Options. The price per Rollway Preferred
Share under the Emerson Options is $20.00 in value of Emerson Common Stock per
share of Rollway Preferred Stock (plus a cash payment equal to unpaid
dividends). The purchase price for the Rollway capital stock is payable in
shares of Emerson Common Stock, except that if the Merger is not considered to
be part of a tax-free reorganization, Emerson must make an additional 10% cash
payment to the Group Shareholders.
For 90 days following the purchase of a Group Shareholder's Rollway shares
under the Emerson Options, Emerson is required to purchase upon any Group
Shareholder's request, on a first requested, first purchased basis, up to an
aggregate of $500,000 of the Emerson Common Stock issued to each Group
Shareholder under the Option Agreement. At the expiration of the 90-day
period, Emerson is required to purchase Emerson Common Stock from the Group
Shareholders only if the Group Shareholder cannot legally sell the shares in
the open market. Emerson's obligation to purchase Emerson Common Stock that
cannot be sold by the Group Shareholders on the open market expires two years
after the closing of the Emerson Option exercise.
In the event the Emerson Options are exercised, $750,000 of the aggregate
Emerson Common Stock issuable under all Emerson Options will be paid into
escrow for 18 months as security for certain representations, warranties and
covenants of the Group Shareholders in the Option Agreements. Emerson is also
permitted to seek reimbursement for certain losses directly from the Group
Shareholders and/or Rollway. Each Group Shareholder's indemnification
obligation is limited to the total consideration received by such Group
Shareholder from Emerson pursuant to his or her Option Agreement.
If Emerson exercises its Emerson Option with respect to H. Follett
Hodgkins, Jr.'s Rollway capital stock, it must enter into a non-competition
agreement with Mr. Hodgkins with the same terms described below under the
heading "--Non-Competition Agreement."
The Emerson Options terminate if Emerson hasn't exercised the Emerson
Options by the later of October 8, 1996 or the fifteenth day after the
termination of the Merger Agreement, if terminated.
Non-Competition and Employment Agreements
At the Closing of the Merger, Emerson and H.F. Hodgkins, Jr., Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Rollway, are expected to enter into a
non-competition agreement (the "Non-Competition Agreement"). Under the
Agreement, Mr. Hodgkins will agree not to compete with the business of Rollway
for a five-year period. Mr. Hodgkins will also agree not to use or disclose
confidential information concerning Rollway. Mr. Hodgkins will be paid
$100,000 per year for the five-year term of the Non-Competition Agreement. In
addition, two life insurance policies with an aggregate death benefit of
$1,358,925 and a cash surrender value of approximately $567,202 at February 22,
1996 (subject to approximately $552,125 of debt at February 22, 1996) will be
transferred by Rollway to Mr. Hodgkins, Mr. Hodgkins and his wife will
<PAGE> 75
participate in Emerson's retiree medical program, and Emerson will pay Mr.
Hodgkins $10,000 per year for life. Execution of the Non-Competition Agreement
is a condition to the consummation of the Merger. The execution of employment
agreements between Emerson and each of Stephen Bregande and Karl Loessner are
also conditions to the consummation of the Merger. See "Interests of Certain
Persons in the Merger."
Certain Federal Income Tax Matters
The following discussion summarizes certain material federal income tax
considerations of the Merger that will generally be applicable to holders of
Rollway securities in connection with the Merger. This discussion is based on
currently existing provisions of the Code, existing and proposed Treasury
Regulations thereunder and current administrative rulings and court decisions,
all of which are subject to change. Any such change, which may or may not be
retroactive, could alter the tax consequences to Rollway's shareholders as
described herein.
Rollway shareholders should be aware that this discussion does not deal
with all federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to particular
Rollway shareholders in light of their particular circumstances, such as
shareholders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the
Code or who acquired their shares in connection with stock option plans or in
other compensatory transactions. In addition, the following discussion does
not address the tax consequences of the Merger under foreign, state or local
tax laws or the tax consequences of transactions effectuated prior to or after
the Merger (whether or not such transactions are in connection with the
Merger). ACCORDINGLY, ROLLWAY SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX
ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE
APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE
MERGER IN THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.
Neither Emerson nor Rollway has requested a ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service (the "IRS") with regard to any of the federal income tax
consequences of the Merger. Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, counsel to Rollway, has
rendered an opinion dated April 1, 1996, (the "Tax Opinion"), that the Merger
will constitute a reorganization under Sections 368(a) of the Code (a
"Reorganization"). Such Tax Opinion is based on the assumption that all
documents, agreements and representations to be signed and delivered in
connection with the Merger will be duly signed and delivered in substantially
the form in which they currently exist or currently are expected to exist, that
such documents, agreements and representations are accurate in all material
respects, and that the transactions will proceed as contemplated in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and such documents and upon certain representations and
agreements of Rollway, Emerson and certain shareholders of Rollway.
Consummation of the Merger is conditioned upon the Tax Opinion or a
substantially equivalent other tax opinion being in effect at Closing. The Tax
Opinion is not binding on the IRS and does not preclude the IRS from adopting a
contrary position.
Accordingly, Emerson gives no assurance that the federal tax consequences
set forth in such Tax Opinion will not be challenged by the IRS or that any
such challenge would not be successful.
<PAGE> 76
Tax Consequences to Holders of Rollway Common Stock
Subject to the limitations and qualifications referred to herein, and
assuming the Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, the Tax Opinion opines that
the following federal income tax consequences should result:
(a) No gain or loss will be recognized by the holders of Rollway Common
Stock upon the receipt of Emerson Common Stock solely in exchange for such
Rollway Common Stock in the Merger (except to the extent of cash received in
lieu of fractional shares or as a result of exercising dissenters rights).
(b) The aggregate tax basis of the Emerson Common Stock so received by
Rollway shareholders in the Merger (reduced by any amount allocable to
fractional shares for which cash is received) will be the same as the aggregate
tax basis of the Rollway Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor,
decreased by the amount of cash and the fair market value of any other
consideration received in the Merger and increased by the amount of gain, if
any, recognized by the Rollway shareholder on the exchange.
(c) The holding period of the Emerson Common Stock so received by each
Rollway shareholder in the Merger will include the period for which the Rollway
Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor was considered to be held,
provided that the Rollway Common Stock so surrendered is held as a capital
asset at the time of the Merger.
(d) Cash payments received by holders of Rollway Common Stock in lieu of a
fractional share will be treated as if such fractional share of Emerson Common
Stock has been issued in the Merger and then redeemed by Emerson. A Rollway
shareholder receiving such cash will recognize gain or loss upon such payment,
measured by the difference (if any) between the amount of cash received and the
basis in such fractional share. The gain or loss should be capital gain or
loss provided that such share of Rollway Common Stock was held as a capital
asset at the time of the Merger.
(e) Until such time, if ever, as a claim is made against the Escrow
Deposit by Emerson or the Surviving Corporation, the holders of Rollway Common
Stock will be deemed for all purposes to be the owners of the Emerson Common
Shares held in escrow pursuant to the Escrow Agreement. Accordingly, each
holder of Rollway Common Stock participating in the Merger will be required to
report and include in income for federal tax purposes his or her proportionate
share of any earnings on the Escrow Deposit, including but not limited to any
dividends paid on the Emerson Common Shares.
(f) A shareholder of Rollway who exercises dissenters' rights under any
applicable law with respect to a share of Rollway Common Stock and receives
payments for such stock in cash will recognize capital gain or loss (if such
stock was held as a capital asset at the Effective Time) measured by the
difference between the amount of cash received and the shareholder's basis in
such share, provided such payment is neither essentially equivalent to a
dividend within the meaning of Section 302 of the Code nor has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend within the meaning of Section 356(a)(2) of the Code
(collectively, a "Dividend Equivalent Transaction").
A sale of Rollway Common Shares incident to an exercise of dissenters'
rights will generally not be a Dividend Equivalent Transaction if, as a result
of such exercise, the dissenting shareholder owns no shares of Emerson Common
Stock (either actually or constructively within the meaning of Section 318 of
the Code).
<PAGE> 77
The Tax Opinion is subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement and certain representations and covenants received from Rollway,
Emerson, Emersub and certain shareholders of Rollway, including representations
in certain certificates delivered to counsel by certain shareholders of
Rollway, by Emerson and by Emersub, the truth and accuracy of which are assumed
for purposes of rendering the Tax Opinion.
Specifically, Rollway has represented and warranted to Hancock & Estabrook,
LLP that:
(i) the fair market value of the Emerson Common Stock received by the
Rollway Shareholders in the Merger will be approximately equal to the fair
market value of the Rollway Common and Preferred Stock surrendered;
(ii) there is no plan or intention by the officers or directors of Rollway
who are also shareholders of Rollway, and to the best of the knowledge of the
management of Rollway there is no plan or intention on the part of the
remaining Rollway Shareholders to sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a
number of shares of Emerson Common Stock received in the Merger that would
reduce the Rollway Shareholders' ownership of Emerson Common Stock to a number
of shares having a value, as of the date of the Merger, of less than fifty
percent (50%) of the value of all of the formerly outstanding Rollway Common
Stock and Preferred Stock as of the same date;
(iii) except as otherwise specifically provided in the Merger Agreement,
Rollway, Emerson, Emersub and the shareholders of Rollway will each pay their
respective expenses, if any, incurred in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
(iv) on the date of the Merger, the fair market value of the assets of
Rollway will exceed the sum of its liabilities to which the assets are subject;
(v) neither Emerson nor Emersub owns, directly or indirectly, nor have they
owned during the past five years, directly or indirectly, any shares of Rollway
Common or Preferred Stock;
(vi) there is no indebtedness existing between Emerson and Rollway or
between Emersub and Rollway;
(vii) the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares of Emerson Common
Stock is solely for the purpose of avoiding the expense and inconvenience to
Emerson of issuing fractional shares and does not represent separately
bargained for consideration; any fractional share interest in Emerson Common
Stock in lieu of which cash will be paid will be less than one full share of
Emerson Common Stock; and the fractional interests of each Rollway Shareholder
will be aggregated and no Rollway Shareholder will receive cash in an amount
equal to or grater than the value of one full share of Emerson Common Stock in
respect of such fractional share interest;
(viii) at the time of the Merger, Rollway will not have outstanding any
warrants, options, convertible securities or any other type of right pursuant
to which any person could acquire Rollway Common or Preferred Stock that, if
exercised or converted, would affect Emerson's acquisition or retention of all
of the outstanding shares of Rollway Common and Preferred Stock;
(ix) Rollway is not an investment company as defined in Section
368(a)(2)(F)(iii) and (iv) of the Code;
<PAGE> 78
(x) if the Preferred Terms Amendment is approved, then, following the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, Rollway will hold at least
ninety percent of the fair market value of its net assets and at least seventy
percent of the fair market value of its gross assets held immediately prior to
the Merger;
(xi) if the Preferred Terms Amendment is not approved then, following the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, Rollway will hold all of its
operating assets (exclusive of cash used to redeem the Rollway Preferred
Stock); and
(xii) if the Preferred Terms Amendment is not approved the funds used to
redeem the Preferred Stock will be supplied by Rollway or borrowed by Rollway
and none of such funds will be supplied by either Emerson or its affiliates; if
Rollway borrows such funds to redeem the Preferred Stock any such loan will not
be guaranteed by Emerson or any of its affiliates; and for a two year period
following the Merger any debt service, refinancing or repayment of any such
loan will be made only by Rollway with its own funds.
Emerson and Emersub have each represented and warranted to Hancock &
Estabrook, LLP that:
(i) Emerson is and at the time of the Merger will be in control of Emersub,
within the meaning of Section 368(c) of the Code;
(ii) Emersub has been formed solely for the purpose of merging into
Rollway, and has not conducted and will not conduct any activity other than
those required for the Merger;
(iii) following the Merger there is no plan or intention for Rollway to
issue additional shares of its stock that would result in Emerson losing
control of Rollway within the meaning of Section 368(c) of the Code;
(iv) there is no plan or intention to liquidate Rollway; to merge Rollway
with or into another corporation; to cause Rollway to sell or otherwise dispose
of any of its assets (except for dispositions made in the ordinary course of
business); or to sell or otherwise dispose of any of the shares of Rollway
Common or Preferred Stock acquired in the Merger;
(v) except for fractional share interests which will be settled in cash,
Emerson has no plan or intention to redeem or otherwise reacquire any of its
stock to be issued in the Merger except for any possible purchases made in the
open market pursuant to a Board authorized stock repurchase plan;
(vi) neither Emerson or Emersub owns directly or indirectly, nor have they
owned during the past five years, directly or indirectly, any shares of stock
of Rollway;
(vii) following the Merger, Rollway will continue its historic business or
use a significant portion of its historic business assets in a business;
(viii) neither Emerson nor Emersub is an investment company as defined in
Section 368(a)(2)(F)(iii) and
(iv) of the Code;
(ix) the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares of Emerson Common
Stock is solely for the purpose of avoiding the expense and inconvenience to
Emerson of issuing fractional shares and does not represent separately
<PAGE> 79
bargained for consideration; any fractional share interest in Emerson stock in
lieu of which cash is paid will be less than one full share of Emerson stock;
and the fractional interests of each Rollway shareholder will be aggregated and
no Rollway shareholder will receive cash in an amount equal to or greater than
the value of one full share of Emerson Common Stock in respect of such
fractional share interest;
(x) except as otherwise provided in the Merger Agreement, Emerson, Emersub,
Rollway and the shareholders of Rollway will each pay their respective
expenses, if any, incurred in connection with the transaction;
(xi) Emersub will have no liabilities which will be assumed by Rollway and
will not transfer to Rollway any assets subject to liabilities, in the
transaction;
(xii) there is no indebtedness existing between Emerson and Rollway or
between Emersub and Rollway;
(xiii) if the Merger is approved, except for those holders of Rollway
Common Shares who dissent, all Rollway Common Shareholders will exchange their
shares of Rollway Common Stock for Emerson voting stock. If the Preferred
Terms Amendment is approved, all holders of Rollway Preferred Shares, except
for those who dissent, will receive Emerson voting stock in exchange for
Rollway Preferred Stock (other than cash paid in respect of dividends in
arrears);
(xiv) if the Preferred Terms Amendment is not approved, Rollway Preferred
Shareholders will be redeemed for cash pursuant to Section 4.5 of the Merger
Agreement;
(xv) the payments and benefits to be made to H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr. under
the non-competition agreement described in Section 5.13 of the Merger Agreement
are not separate consideration for or allocable to any of his Shares of stock
of Rollway; and
(xvi) in the event the Preferred Terms Amendment is not approved, none of
the funds used to redeem the Rollway Preferred Stock will be supplied by either
Emerson or any of its affiliates (other than Rollway); if Rollway borrows funds
to redeem the Rollway Preferred Stock such loan will not be guaranteed by
Emerson or any of its affiliates; and for the two year period following the
Merger, any debt service, refinancing or repayment of such loan will be made
only by Rollway with its own funds.
In addition, certain of the Shareholders of Rollway have represented,
warranted and covenanted to Hancock & Estabrook, LLP that:
(i) except for certain sales of an insubstantial amount which will not
affect the tax opinion of Hancock & Estabrook, LLP no such Shareholders have
any present intention to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the shares of
Emerson Common Stock to be received by such Shareholders in the Merger; and
(ii) if it becomes necessary or desirable for any such Shareholder to
dispose of any of the Emerson Common Stock received in the Merger within two
years of receipt of such stock the Shareholders will first obtain an opinion
from Hancock & Estabrook, LLP or other recognized tax counsel to the effect any
such proposed sale, transfer or other disposition will not result in the Merger
being a taxable event under the Code.
<PAGE> 80
Finally, H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr. has represented and warranted to Hancock
& Estabrook, LLP that the payments to be made to him under the non-competition
agreement described in Section 5.13 of the Merger Agreement are not separate
consideration for or allocable to any of his Shares of stock in Rollway.
Certain of these representations are qualified as to the knowledge of the
relevant party. If the facts as represented are not accurate, the Merger may
fail to qualify as a tax-free reorganization. In such case, a shareholder
would recognize gain or loss equal to the fair market value of the Rollway
Common Stock surrendered less such shareholder's basis in these shares.
The Merger should constitute a Reorganization either (1) under Sections
368(a)(1)(A) and (a)(2)(E) of the Code if the Preferred Terms Agreement is
approved by a majority of the holders of Rollway Preferred Stock and such
shareholders receive Emerson common stock or (ii) under Section 368(a)(1)(B) if
the Preferred Terms Agreement is not approved by a majority of the holders of
the Rollway Preferred Stock and such shareholders are redeemed with Rollway
funds (or a Rollway borrowing). Qualification as a Reorganization under
Sections 368(a)(1)(A) and 368(a)(2)(E) requires that Emerson acquire "control"
of Rollway solely for Emerson voting stock. Control is defined for these
purposes as 80% of the combined voting power of all Rollway stock entitled to
vote and 80%of each other class of outstanding Rollway stock. Stock which is
redeemed by Rollway with its own funds in connection with the Merger will not
be considered outstanding for this purpose. Emerson will acquire at least 80%
of the Rollway Common Stock for Emerson Common stock, taking into account the
exercise of the Emerson Options under the Option Agreements, if exercised. The
Rollway Preferred Stock will either be converted into Emerson Common Stock
pursuant to the Merger or redeemed by Rollway with its own funds in connection
with the Merger. Thus, the "control" requirement should be satisfied. If
Emerson were considered to acquire more than 20% of either the Rollway Common
Stock or Rollway Preferred Stock for other than Emerson Common Stock the Merger
would not qualify as a Reorganization. Qualification as a Reorganization under
Sections 368(a)(1)(A) and 368(a)(2)(E) also requires that the Merger satisfy a
"substantially all" properties requirement. This requirement is satisfied if
following the Merger Rollway holds "substantially all" the properties it held
prior to the Merger taking into account any extraordinary dividends or
redemptions that are part of the Reorganization. The IRS for advance ruling
purposes requires that the merged entity hold at least 90% of the fair market
value of the "net assets" it held prior to the Merger and 70% of the fair
market value of the "gross assets" it held prior to the Merger. Thus, if the
Rollway Preferred Stock is redeemed by Rollway in connection with the Merger
and the consideration constitutes more than 10% of the combined value of the
Rollway Common Stock and Rollway Preferred Stock outstanding prior to the
Merger, the IRS advance ruling position would not be met. Such advance ruling
position is not a rule of law and case law would support a lower threshold
based on an examination of all the facts and circumstances.
If the "substantially all" properties requirement, set forth above, were
not satisfied as a result of the redemption of the Preferred Stock, the Merger,
nevertheless, should qualify as a Reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(B).
Such a Reorganization requires that Emerson "control" Rollway immediately
following the Merger, and that the sole consideration provided by Emerson to
the Rollway shareholders (excluding cash received in lieu of fractional shares)
be Emerson voting stock. Emerson will "control" Rollway following the Merger.
Thus, the control requirement should be satisfied. Further, since any
consideration paid to redeem the Preferred Stock or pay dissenters will come
from Rollway funds (or a Rollway borrowing) and will not be paid by Emerson or
any of its affiliates, the solely for voting stock requirement should be met.
<PAGE> 81
In such case, the Merger should qualify as a Reorganization pursuant to Section
368(a)(1)(B).
A successful IRS challenge to the Reorganization status of the Merger (as a
result of a failure of the "control" requirement, "substantially all"
requirement, the solely voting stock requirement (in the case of a
Reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(B)), or otherwise) would result in
significant tax consequences. Each Rollway shareholder would recognize gain or
loss with respect to each share of Rollway Common Stock surrendered equal to
the difference between the shareholder's basis in such share and the fair
market value, as of the Effective Time, of the Emerson Common Stock received in
exchange therefor. In such event, a shareholder's aggregate basis in the
Emerson Common Stock so received would equal its fair market value, and the
shareholder's holding period for such stock would begin the day after the
Merger.
Even if the Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, a recipient of shares of
Emerson Common Stock would recognize gain to the extent that such shares were
considered to be received in exchange for services or property (other than
solely Rollway Common Stock). Gain would also have to be recognized to the
extent that an Rollway shareholder was treated as receiving (directly or
indirectly) consideration other than Emerson Common Stock. All or a portion of
such gain amounts may be taxable as ordinary income.
Tax Consequences to Holders of Rollway Preferred Stock
If the Preferred Terms Amendment is approved, the exchange of Rollway
Preferred Stock for Emerson Common Stock and cash should have the same federal
income tax consequences as described above under the heading "--Tax
Consequences to Holders of Rollway Common Stock." Cash payments received in
payment of accrued and unpaid dividends on the Rollway Preferred Stock will be
taxable as ordinary income.
If the Preferred Terms Amendment is not approved and Rollway redeems the
Rollway Preferred Stock for $20.00 in cash per share immediately prior to the
Merger, as required by the Merger Agreement, holders of Rollway Preferred Stock
would recognize gain or loss with respect to each share of Rollway Preferred
Stock surrendered equal to the difference between the $20.00 redemption price
to be paid by Rollway and the holder's basis in each such share. Cash payments
received in payment of accrued and unpaid dividends on the Rollway Preferred
Stock will be taxable as ordinary income.
Because of the complexity of the tax laws, and because the tax consequences
of the Merger to any particular shareholder may be affected by matters not
discussed herein, it is recommended that each holder of Rollway securities
consult his or her personal tax advisor concerning the applicable foreign and
United States federal, state and local income tax consequences of the Merger.
Accounting Treatment
The Merger will be accounted for by Emerson as a "purchase," as such term
is used under generally accepted accounting principles, for accounting and
financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, from and after the Effective Time,
Rollway's results of operations will be included in Emerson's consolidated
results of operations. For purposes thereof, Emerson will establish a new
accounting basis for Rollway's assets and liabilities based upon the fair
<PAGE> 82
market values thereof and Emerson's purchase price, including the cost of the
acquisition.
Regulatory Approvals
Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act ("H-S-R Act") and the rules promulgated
thereunder by the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC"), the Merger may not be
consummated until notifications have been given and certain information has
been furnished to the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice (the "Antitrust Division") and specified waiting period requirements
have been satisfied. Emerson and Rollway filed notification and report forms
under the H-S-R Act with the FTC and the Antitrust Division on December 7,
1995, and the required waiting periods for such filings under the H-S-R Act
were terminated on December 15, 1995. However, at any time before or after the
Effective Time of the Merger, and notwithstanding that the H-S-R Act waiting
periods have been terminated, the FTC, the Antitrust Division or any state
government could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems
necessary or desirable in the public interest. Such action could include
seeking to enjoin the Merger or seeking divestiture of Rollway by Emerson, in
whole or in part, or the divestiture of substantial assets of Emerson, Rollway
or their respective subsidiaries. In addition to approvals under the H-S-R
Act, consummation of the Merger is conditioned upon the receipt of all
necessary governmental and regulatory approvals and requirements in connection
with the transactions contemplated hereby, all of which have been obtained.
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, Emerson and H.
Follett Hodgkins, Jr. are expected to enter into the Non-Competition Agreement
described above under the heading "--Non-Competition Agreement." Execution of
the Non-Competition Agreement is a condition of the closing of the Merger.
Pursuant to the Option Agreement (see "The Merger - Option Agreements"),
Mr. Hodgkins has agreed to vote all of his Rollway Common Shares in favor of
the Merger and all of his Rollway Common Shares and Rollway Preferred Shares in
favor of the Preferred Terms Amendment and has agreed to enter into the
Non-Competition Agreement if Emerson exercises the Emerson Options.
Also at the Effective Time, Emerson expects to enter into employment
agreements with Edmund Babiarz, Stephen Bregande and Karl Loessner. Each of
these individuals is an officer and/or director of Rollway. Mr. Loessner and
Mr. Bregande's employment agreements are attached to the Merger Agreement
(Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus) as Exhibits 5.13(a) and 5.13(b),
respectively. Mr. Loessner will be employed as Managing Director of LRNV. Mr.
Loessner's employment agreement is of indefinite duration, subject to
termination in accordance with Belgian law. Mr. Loessner's base salary will be
250,000 Deutsche Marks per year. Mr. Loessner will also be eligible for
certain bonus payments yet to be determined. Mr. Bregande will be employed as
President of the Surviving Corporation. His employment agreement has a term of
one year and provides for an annual base salary of $200,000. In addition, Mr.
Bregande will be eligible to receive an incentive bonus based on achieving
certain financial targets, with a maximum bonus payment of $120,000. If Mr.
Bregande's employment is terminated without cause, he will receive severance
payments equal to twelve months of his base salary. Mr. Babiarz's employment
agreement contains substantially the same terms as Mr. Bregande's employment
agreement, except that Mr. Babiarz will be employed as a Vice President of the
Surviving Corporation, will have a base salary of $105,000, will be eligible to
<PAGE> 83
receive a maximum incentive bonus of $100,000, and will receive twelve months
of severance pay if terminated without cause.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of the Merger
Agreement not summarized elsewhere in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The
Merger Agreement is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement/Prospectus
and is incorporated herein by reference. Such summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement.
Exchange Procedures
If the Merger is approved at the Rollway Special Meeting, each holder of
Rollway Common Stock (and each holder of Rollway Preferred Stock, if the
Preferred Terms Amendment is approved) will be mailed a letter of transmittal
with which each holder of a certificate or certificates representing
outstanding shares of Rollway Stock ("Certificates") may tender such
Certificates in exchange for the applicable consideration. (Letters of
transmittal will also be available at the Rollway Special Meeting.) The
letters of transmittal specify that delivery will be effected, and risk of loss
and title to the Certificates will pass, only upon proper delivery of the
Certificates to Boatmen's Trust Company of St. Louis (the "Exchange Agent") as
exchange agent and contain instructions for effecting the surrender of the
Certificates in exchange for certificates representing shares of Emerson Common
Stock and cash in lieu of any fractional shares. In the case of lost or
destroyed certificates, Emerson will accept documentation acceptable to it in
lieu thereof and may also require the holder of a lost or destroyed certificate
to post an insurance bond acceptable to Emerson. Upon the consummation of the
Merger, each holder of Certificates, subject to the surrender of such
Certificates together with the transmittal letter duly completed and executed
by such holder, will receive (i) certificates evidencing that number of whole
shares of Emerson Common Stock to which such holder is entitled to receive in
exchange therefor (less any amounts to be retained in the Escrow and the
Holdback), (ii) any dividends or other distributions to which such holder is
entitled in respect of Rollway Preferred Shares and as described below and
(iii) cash in lieu of fractional shares of Emerson Common Stock; and the
Certificates so surrendered will be cancelled. Until surrendered, each
Certificate will be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to evidence
only the right to receive upon such surrender the applicable portion of the
consideration described above.
No fractional shares of Emerson Stock will be issued in connection with the
Merger. Where the Merger would otherwise require the issuance of a fractional
share, cash equal to such fractional interest multiplied by the Emerson Share
Value will be paid to the holder of such interest in lieu of a fractional
share.
No dividends or other distributions will be paid to a former shareholder of
Rollway with respect to shares of Emerson Common Stock until such shareholder's
Certificate(s) are transmitted to the Exchange Agent. Any dividends declared
on Emerson Common Stock between the Effective Time and the date of the
surrender of such Certificate(s) will be held by Emerson for the benefit of the
holder and will be paid to the holder, without interest thereon, upon the
surrender of such Certificate(s). Holders of any unsurrendered Certificates
will not be entitled to vote the Emerson Common Stock to which they are
<PAGE> 84
entitled until such Certificates are exchanged for certificates representing
Emerson Common Stock.
At the Effective Time, the stock transfer books of Rollway will be closed,
and there will be no further registration of transfer of shares thereafter on
the records of Rollway.
Representations and Warranties
The Merger Agreement contains various representations and warranties of
Rollway and its subsidiaries concerning the following matters: (i) due
organization and qualification of Rollway and its subsidiaries and their power
and authority to use their assets and properties and conduct their businesses;
(ii) the capital structure of Rollway and its subsidiaries; (iii) the
authorization, execution, delivery, performance and enforceability of the
Merger Agreement by and against Rollway and its subsidiaries; (iv) the absence
of any agreement or obligation, including but not limited to, notes, mortgages,
indentures, deeds of trust and liens or any statute, regulation or order that
either would be breached or accelerated by the execution of the Merger
Agreement or would prevent the effectuation of the transactions contemplated
therein; (v) third-party consents; (vi) receipt by the directors of Rollway of
a "fairness opinion" and the adoption of resolutions approving the Merger
Agreement and transactions contemplated therein and determination of the
fairness of the Merger and recommendation of the Merger by the directors of
Rollway; (vii) the accuracy of the financial statements of Rollway; (viii) the
usability, salability and condition of Rollway's inventory; (ix) the validity
and enforceability of the accounts and notes receivables of Rollway; (x) the
absence of any undisclosed liability of Rollway; (xi) certain tax matters
relating to, and payment of taxes by, Rollway; (xii) disclosure of certain
events in the operation of Rollway's business or relating to its properties;
(xiii) ownership status and use of real property owned or leased by Rollway;
(xiv) Rollway's legal and marketable title to its assets; (xv) the maintenance
of Rollway's tangible assets; (xvi) the validity and enforceability of all
intangible assets, rights, items and documents necessary or desirable to carry
on the business of Rollway; (xvii) the compliance with, and absence of default
or violation of, any statute, regulation, order, license or charter document;
(xviii) the possession and validity of all licenses or permits required to
conduct Rollway's business; (xix) disclosure of certain contractual obligations
of Rollway; (xx) the validity of certain contracts; (xxi) the status of
Rollway's relationship with certain of its customers and suppliers; (xxii)
disclosure of pending or threatened litigation; (xxiii) an accurate listing of
Rollway's officers, directors, employees and consultants; (xxiv) disclosure of
indebtedness to or from Rollway's shareholders, directors, officers, employees
or agents beyond normal salaries and employee benefits; (xxv) disclosure of
certain affiliations and outside financial interests of Rollway's directors and
officers; (xxvi) the absence of bribes or other illegal or improper payments,
by Rollway to certain individuals; (xxvii) the nature of Rollway's labor
agreements, employee benefit plans and employment agreements and related ERISA
matters; (xxviii) claims for overtime, back wages, vacation and minimum wages
and the absence of claims related to discrimination, workers compensation or
occupation, safety and health standards; (xxix) alien employment eligibility;
(xxx) the absence of pending or threatened labor disputes, strikes or work
stoppages that may reasonably be expected to affect the business condition of
Rollway and the absence of any unfair labor practices by Rollway or any of its
employees, representatives or agents; (xxxi) disclosure of pending or
threatened charges or complaints against Rollway by the National Labor
Relations Board or any state or local labor or employment agency or
<PAGE> 85
representative thereof; (xxxii) the status of insurance policies; (xxxiii) the
status of certain financial guarantees and product warranties, product
liability, product safety or similar claims against Rollway; (xxxiv) certain
environmental matters regarding Rollway; (xxxv) the absence of any brokerage,
finder's or agent's fees due in connection with the Merger; (xxxvi) disclosure
of foreign assets and compliance with foreign laws and regulations; (xxxvii)
the status, accuracy and completeness of Rollway's bank accounts, books and
records; and (xxxviii) full disclosure.
Emerson may make a claim for indemnification for breach of any of the
foregoing representations and warranties until the end of the eighteenth month
after the Closing Date, except that (i) claims for indemnification relating to
breaches of the representations and warranties pertaining to tax matters may be
brought until the later of the final resolution of any proceeding involving any
such tax matter or expiration of any applicable statute of limitations, and
(ii) claims for indemnification relating to breaches of the representations and
warranties pertaining to Rollway's title to its property and assets may be
brought until May 14, 2006.
The Merger Agreement contains various representations and warranties of
Emerson and Emersub concerning the following matters: (i) due organization and
qualification of Emerson and Emersub and their power and authority to use their
assets and properties and conduct its businesses; (ii) the capital structure of
Emerson and Emersub; (iii) the authorization, execution, delivery, performance
and enforceability of the Merger Agreement by and against Emerson and Emersub;
(iv) the absence of any agreement or obligation, including but not limited to
notes, mortgages, indentures, deeds of trust and liens or any statute,
regulation or order that either would be breached or accelerated by the
execution of the Merger Agreement or that would prevent the effectuation of the
transaction(s) contemplated therein; (v) third-party consents; (vi) the status
of the Emerson Shares; (vii) the filing by Emerson of all reports and other
documents required by the Exchange Act or the Securities Act; and (viii) the
absence of any brokerage, finder's or agent's fees in connection with the
Merger.
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
Rollway has agreed that unless otherwise consented to by Emerson, the
business of Rollway and its subsidiaries will be conducted in the ordinary
course of business and consistent with past practice, subject to certain
exceptions. Rollway has agreed that neither Rollway nor any of its
subsidiaries will do, or agree to do, any of the following: (i) grant any
increase in the rate of pay of any of its employees, grant any increase in the
salaries of any officer, employee or agent, grant any additional Rollway
Options or otherwise modify the terms thereof (except as specifically
contemplated in the Merger Agreement), enter into or increase the benefits
provided under any bonus, profit-sharing, incentive compensation, pension,
retirement, medical, hospitalization, life insurance or other insurance plan or
plans, or other contracts or commitments, or in any other way increase in any
amount the benefits or compensation of any such officer, employee or agent,
except, however, ordinary increases in compensation not unusual in character or
amount made in the ordinary course of business to employees who are not
directors or officers, and except that Rollway may continue in place benefit,
bonus or incentive plans which were scheduled by their terms to terminate or
lapse as of the end of fiscal year 1995 and proceed with such plan(s) through
the Closing Date; (ii) enter into any employment contract or collective
bargaining agreement; (iii) sell, dispose of, or encumber any assets (except
<PAGE> 86
pursuant to existing contracts); (iv) make, or enter into any contract for, any
capital expenditure or enter into any material lease of capital equipment or
real estate involving more than $50,000 individually (except pursuant to
existing contracts); (v) enter into any contract or commitment (other than for
the purchase or sale of inventory, supplies, other products or services in the
ordinary course of business) involving more than $25,000, or enter into any
series of such contracts with one party or known affiliated group of parties
involving more than $25,000 in the aggregate; (vi) create, assume, incur or
guarantee any indebtedness other than (a) in the usual and ordinary course of
business and with a maturity date of less than one year or (b) that incurred
pursuant to existing contracts; (vii) declare or pay any dividend on, issue or
make any sale of, or distribution in respect of, its capital stock or directly
or indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any of its capital stock,
except for issuances of Rollway Stock under existing Rollway Options;
(viii) conduct or transact business other than in a manner consistent with its
past practices or change any accounting procedures or practices or its
financial structure, except as required to conform to generally accepted
accounting principles, in which case Rollway must give Emerson prior notice
thereof; (ix) except as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, make any
amendments to or changes in its Certificate of Incorporation or By-Laws, or
with respect to Rollway's subsidiaries, any of their respective constituent
documents; (x) perform any act, or attempt to do any act, or permit any act or
omission, which will or may reasonably be expected to cause a breach by Rollway
of any contract to which it is a party, including the Merger Agreement; or
(xi) fail to conduct its existing activities substantially in the same manner
as previously conducted, fail to use its reasonable best efforts to keep its
business organization intact, including its present employees and present
relationships with suppliers and customers and others having advantageous
business relations with it, fail to maintain its existing insurance policies on
property owned or leased by it in full force and effect, or fail to operate,
maintain and repair all of such property in a manner consistent with past
practice.
Certain Other Covenants
In addition to the covenants described above and elsewhere in this Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, the following is a description of certain other principal
covenants of the parties to the Merger Agreement. Both Rollway and Emerson
have agreed: (i) to cooperate and use their best efforts to prepare and file
Emerson's registration statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") and
all appropriate state securities or "blue sky filings" with respect to the
Emerson Shares to be issued in the Merger and to use their reasonable best
efforts to cause the Registration Statement to be declared effective; (ii) that
any event that should be set forth in an amendment of, or a supplement to, the
Proxy Statement, will be promptly so disclosed; (iii) to use their respective
reasonable best efforts to consummate and make effective as promptly as
practicable the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and to assist
each other in their respective efforts to obtain all necessary waivers,
consents and approvals from other parties to material loan agreements, leases
and other contracts; (iv) to use their respective reasonable best efforts to
obtain all necessary consents, approvals and authorizations, to effect all
necessary registrations and filings and to meet all other conditions to closing
set forth in the Merger Agreement; (v) to refrain from issuing any press
release or otherwise making any public statements with respect to the Merger
Agreement, the Merger or any of their respective terms without the prior
written consent of the other; and (vi) to execute and deliver, or cause to be
executed and delivered, all such documents and instruments, and to take, or
<PAGE> 87
cause to be taken, all such further or other actions as they may reasonably
deem necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement.
In addition, Rollway has agreed: (i) to promptly deliver or mail this Proxy
Statement, and any amendment of, or supplement to, this Proxy Statement, to its
shareholders ; (ii) that the Board of Directors of Rollway will recommend that
holders of Rollway Common Shares vote to adopt and approve the Merger and that
the holders of Rollway Preferred Shares vote to adopt and approve the Preferred
Terms Amendment, and that this Proxy Statement and the documents sent to the
shareholders of Rollway and the holders of Rollway Options will contain such
recommendations; (iii) to indemnify and hold harmless Emerson and its
directors, officers, control persons, employees, agents and representatives
from and against any liability relating to or arising out of information
provided by them for inclusion in the Registration Statement or any federal or
state filing; (iv) to take all action necessary in accordance with applicable
law and its Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws to convene the Rollway
Special Meeting as promptly as practicable to consider and vote upon the Merger
and the Preferred Terms Amendment and that the Board of Directors of Rollway
will use their best efforts to obtain necessary approvals of its shareholders
and take all other actions necessary or helpful to secure the vote or consent
of such shareholders; (v) to redeem all of the issued and outstanding Rollway
Preferred Shares immediately prior to the Effective Time, using borrowed funds,
if necessary, if the holders of a majority of the Rollway Preferred Shares do
not approve the Preferred Terms Amendment; (vi) that its committee shall amend
the Rollway Option Plan and each option agreement issued thereunder to provide
that all Rollway Options shall be exercisable immediately prior to the
Effective Time; (vii) to provide Emerson with full access at all reasonable
times to all its premises, properties, books, records, contracts, tax records
and documents relating to its business condition, and furnish to Emerson any
such information as Emerson may reasonably request from time to time; (viii) to
maintain its books and financial records in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles consistently applied and on a basis consistent with its
past practices, ensure that such books and financial records fairly and
accurately reflect the operations, results and condition, financial and
otherwise, of Rollway, and furnish to Emerson promptly, as available, financial
statements and operating reports applicable to Rollway; (ix) that neither
Emerson nor the Surviving Corporation will be liable for or deemed to have
assumed any Rollway pension or employee benefit plans or arrangements other
than those disclosed in the Merger Agreement; and (x) to deliver to Emerson at
Closing certain tax information and (xi) to indemnify Emerson for any expenses
or losses incurred by Emerson or the Surviving Corporation arising out of the
assertion of certain tax liabilities, Rollway's agreement to indemnify MPI, the
commission payment practices of LRNV, or certain legal proceedings pending
against Rollway.
No Solicitation of Transactions
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Rollway has agreed not to, directly or
indirectly, through its agents or representatives or otherwise, solicit or
cause the solicitation of, or in any way encourage the making of, or negotiate,
respond to, cooperate with, or to furnish or cause to be furnished any
information with respect to, any offer, proposal or indication of interest from
any person, entity or group (other than Emerson) involving the purchase, sale,
transfer, merger or recapitalization of all or a portion of the securities,
business or assets of Rollway. Rollway has agreed to notify Emerson
immediately of any such offer, proposal or indication of interests received by
<PAGE> 88
Rollway or any of their agents or representatives and describe the terms
thereof, unless advised in writing by its counsel that the fiduciary duties of
the Board of Directors of Rollway requires otherwise.
Conditions to the Consummation of the Merger
The obligations of Emerson, Emersub and Rollway to consummate the Merger
are subject to the satisfaction, or where legally permissible, waiver, of the
following conditions: (i) no preliminary or permanent injunction or other
order, decree or ruling issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or by a
governmental agency concerning the Merger Agreement, being in effect, or having
been recommended by the staff of a governmental agency and approved by such
agency, which would make illegal or otherwise prevent consummation of the
Merger; (ii) compliance with the requirements of any applicable law relating to
the consummation of the Merger; (iii) the satisfaction or receipt of all
necessary governmental and regulatory approvals and requirements in connection
with the Merger, including, without limitation, expiration of the waiting
period(s) under the H-S-R Act; (iv) the due approval by the shareholders of
Rollway of the Merger Agreement and the Merger in accordance with NYBCL and
Rollway's Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws; and (v) the declaration of
effectiveness of the Registration Statement and the absence of any stop order
suspending such effectiveness and the attainment of all other clearances or
approvals necessary under applicable state securities or blue sky laws relative
to the issuance of Emerson Shares pursuant to the Merger.
The obligations of Emerson and Emersub to effect the Merger and the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are also subject to
satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions: (i) each of the
representations and warranties of Rollway contained in the Merger Agreement
being true and correct in all material respects on the date of the Merger
Agreement and on the Closing Date; (ii) Rollway performing or complying in all
material respects with all of the covenants and obligations to be performed or
complied with by it under the terms of the Merger Agreement on or prior to the
Closing Date; (iii) there having been no material adverse change, actual or
threatened, in the business, assets, results of operations or condition,
financial or otherwise, of Rollway, whether or not covered by insurance; (iv)
the receipt of all consents and approvals necessary to ensure that the
Surviving Corporation will continue to have the same full rights with respect
to Rollway's property and assets as existed immediately prior to the Merger;
(v) no more than 5% of the holders of the outstanding Rollway Common Shares and
no more than 5% of the holders of the outstanding Rollway Preferred Shares
having exercised or claimed appraisal or dissenting shareholders rights; (vi)
the approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment or the redemption of the Rollway
Preferred Shares; (vii) the exercise of all Rollway Options; (viii) Mr.
Hodgkins having relinquished and transferred to the Surviving Corporation his
rights under a split-dollar insurance arrangement with Rollway; (ix) Rollway
obtaining certain easements and an owner's title policy with respect to certain
of its real property; and (x) Emerson having received: (a) a certificate
signed by a duly authorized officer of Rollway, dated as of the Closing Date
and subject to no qualification, certifying that the conditions set forth in
clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (v) of this paragraph and clauses (i) and (iv) of
the paragraph preceding this paragraph have been satisfied, (b) an opinion of
Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, counsel to Rollway, dated the Closing Date,
(c) employment agreements duly executed by Karl L. Loessner and Stephen M.
Bregande, (d) the Non-Competition Agreement executed by H. Follett Hodgkins,
Jr., (e) the written resignation of certain officers and directors of Rollway,
(f) certificates relating to compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
<PAGE> 89
executed by H. Follett Hodgkins, Jr., Stephen M. Bregande, Karl L. Loessner and
William Eames, and (g) all documentation necessary to transfer ownership of
Rollway's foreign subsidiaries.
The obligation of Rollway to consummate the Merger is subject to the
satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions: (i) the
representations and warranties of Emerson and Emersub contained in the Merger
Agreement being true and correct in all material respects on the date of the
Merger Agreement and on the Closing Date; (ii) Emerson and Emersub duly
performing or complying in all material respects with all of the covenants and
obligations to be performed or complied with by them under the terms of the
Merger Agreement on or prior to the Closing Date; (iii) Rollway not having
received written notice that the tax opinion of its counsel has been rescinded;
and (iv) Rollway having received: (a) a certificate signed by duly authorized
officers of Emerson and Emersub, dated as of the Closing Date and subject to no
qualification, certifying that the conditions set forth in clauses (i) and (ii)
of this paragraph and clause (i) of the paragraph before the preceding
paragraph have been satisfied, (b) opinions of Bryan Cave LLP and Harley M.
Smith, counsel to Emerson and Emersub, and (c) the Non-Competition Agreement
executed by Emerson.
Termination
The Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby may be
terminated prior to the Closing Date only as follows: (a) by the mutual
written consent of the Boards of Directors of Rollway and Emerson; or (b) by
either Rollway or Emerson in the event the Merger has not been consummated on
or before October 8, 1996, unless the failure to consummate the Merger is a
result of the breach of or default under the Merger Agreement by such party.
Upon termination of the Merger Agreement, the Merger will be abandoned and
all obligations under the Merger Agreement of the parties to the Merger
Agreement will terminate without liability of any party to another party,
except for certain provisions relating to expenses, as described below under
"-- Expenses," and except for certain confidentiality obligations of the
parties set forth in a previously executed confidentiality agreement. The
termination and abandonment of the Merger will not, however, impair or restrict
the rights of any party to any and all remedies at law or in equity in the
event of a breach of or default under the Merger Agreement by another party
thereto.
Expenses
Emerson and Emersub has agreed that they will pay all fees and expenses of
their counsel, accountants and other experts and all other expenses incurred by
them incident to the negotiation, preparation and execution of the Merger
Agreement, the Registration Statement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated in the Merger Agreement, including the costs and fees of filing
under the H-S-R Act. Rollway has agreed that it will pay (or accrue on its
books prior to the preparation of the Closing Balance Sheet) all fees and
expenses of its counsel, accountants and other experts and all other expenses
incurred by Rollway incident to the negotiation, preparation and execution of
the Merger Agreement, the Registration Statement, and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (collectively, the "Closing
Fees"), including, without limitation, the fees and expenses of any finder's or
brokerage fees.
<PAGE> 90
COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
As a result of the Merger, the shareholders of Rollway, whose rights are
currently governed by New York law, will become shareholders of Emerson, whose
rights are governed by Missouri law. The following discussion is intended only
to highlight certain differences between the rights of corporate shareholders
under New York and Missouri law generally and specifically with respect to
shareholders of Rollway and Emerson. The discussion does not purport to
constitute a detailed comparison of the provisions of New York and Missouri
law, and shareholders of Rollway are referred to those laws for a definitive
treatment of the subject matter as well as the Charters and By-Laws of Emerson
and Rollway (see "Available Information").
Election of Directors
New York law permits a New York corporation's Certificate of Incorporation
or By-Laws to provide for classification of a corporation's board of directors
into two, three or four classes. A corporation must have at least three
directors where there are more than two shareholders. The board of directors,
even if less than a quorum, may elect persons to newly created directorships
and vacancies occurring for any reason other than removal without cause, unless
the corporation's governing documents require the shareholders to fill such
vacancies. Unless the Certificate of Incorporation or a shareholder-approved
By-Law provide otherwise, vacancies due to removal without cause must be filled
by a vote of shareholders. A director elected to fill a vacancy, unless
elected by the shareholders, holds office until the next meeting of
shareholders at which the election of directors is in the regular course of
business. Rollway's Certificate of Incorporation provides that the board of
directors should be classified into three classes, or, if fewer than nine
directors, into two classes. Rollway's By-Laws, provides that the number of
directors will not be less than six, which number is within the maximum limit
of 15 and minimum limit of five specified in the Certificate of Incorporation,
and shall be elected by a plurality vote of shareholders. Rollway currently
has six directors divided into two equal classes, serving a three-year term
that are staggered by one year. New York law also provides that the
Certificate of Incorporation may provide for cumulative voting, however,
Rollway's Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting.
Additionally, Rollway's By-Laws provided that if Rollway fails to pay
cumulative dividends on outstanding shares of Rollway Preferred Stock for a
period of three or more years, the holders of Rollway Preferred Stock, voting
as a class, are entitled to elect two directors chosen by plurality vote of
holders of Rollway Preferred Stock. Rollway's By-Laws also provide that
vacancies on the Board of Directors shall be filled by the remaining directors
until the next annual meeting of shareholders, provided, however, if such
vacancy is due to an increase in the board, there shall be no classification of
the additional director until the next annual meeting of shareholders.
Pursuant to Missouri law, directors of Missouri corporations, unless their
terms are staggered, are elected at each annual shareholder meeting, and
vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled by the Board of Directors,
unless the Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws provide otherwise. The
Articles of Incorporation or the By-Laws may authorize the election of
directors by one or more classes or series of shares, and under Missouri law,
shareholders have cumulative voting rights unless the Articles of Incorporation
or By-Laws provide otherwise. Moreover, a corporation must have at least three
directors, unless the Articles of Incorporation provide that one or more
directors shall constitute the Board of Directors. Emerson's Restated Articles
<PAGE> 91
of Incorporation provide that there shall be three classes of directors who
will each serve for three years, and the By-Laws of Emerson preclude cumulative
voting in the election of directors. Emerson's By-Laws also provide that
vacancies on the Board of Directors shall be filled by the remaining directors.
Further, Emerson's By-Laws restrict the times during which and prescribes the
procedures under which shareholders may nominate directors at a meeting of
shareholders. The Board of Directors of Emerson has set the number of
directors at 15.
Removal of Directors
New York law permits shareholders to remove any or all directors for cause,
and, if the Certificate of Incorporation or By-Laws permits, without cause. In
addition, if allowed by the Certificate of Incorporation or by a shareholder-
approved By-Law, the board of directors may remove any director for cause.
When a class or series of stock is entitled to elect one or more directors, any
director so elected may be removed only by the applicable vote of that class or
series. The state attorney general or holders of 10% of all outstanding
shares may bring legal action to remove a director for cause. Rollway's By-
Laws provide that a decrease in the number of directors shall not be effective
to remove any director prior to the expiration of his term of office.
Missouri law provides that, unless a Missouri corporation's Articles of
Incorporation or By-Laws provide otherwise, directors may be removed with or
without cause by a majority vote of the shareholders entitled to vote at an
election of such directors. Pursuant to Emerson's By-Laws and Restated
Articles of Incorporation, a director of Emerson may be removed with or without
cause either by a majority of the whole Board of Directors if such director
fails to meet certain qualifications or by a vote of holders of eighty-five
percent of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors, voting as a
single class.
Indemnification and Limitation of Liability of Directors and Officers
New York law authorizes the indemnification of officers and directors if
such person (1) acted in good faith; (2) in a manner he or she reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation; and
(3) in a criminal proceeding, without reasonable cause to believe his or her
conduct was unlawful. An officer or director who successfully defends a
proceeding is entitled to indemnification. In certain other circumstances, the
corporation must find that the director or officer met the appropriate standard
of conduct. The corporation may make this finding through (1) the board,
acting by a quorum of directors not parties to the action; (2) in certain
circumstances, the board acting upon written opinion of independent legal
counsel; or (3) in certain circumstances the shareholders. In some situations,
a court may award indemnification. Indemnification rights granted in the NYBCL
are not exclusive of other indemnification rights as long as those other rights
do not attach when a judgment or other final adjudication establishes that a
director or officer (1) acted in bad faith or with active and deliberate
dishonesty and that such acts were material to the cause of action adjudicated
or (2) gained a personal financial or other advantage to which the director or
officer was not legally entitled.
Rollway's By-Laws provide that Rollway shall indemnify any person made, or
threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding (including one by or
in the right of Rollway to procure a judgment in its favor), whether civil or
<PAGE> 92
criminal, including an action by or in the right of any other corporation of
any type or kind, domestic or foreign, or any partnership, joint venture,
trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, which any director or officer
of Rollway served in any capacity at the request of Rollway, by reason of the
fact that such individual, is or was a director or officer of Rollway, or is or
was serving such other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee
benefit plan or other enterprise in any capacity, against judgments, fines,
amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees,
actually and necessarily incurred as a result of such action or proceeding, or
any appeal therein. In addition, Rollway may, in the discretion of the Board
of Directors, indemnify all corporate personnel of Rollway, other than
directors and officers, in the same manner and to the same extent as any
director or officer shall be indemnified as described above by reason of his
being, or having been, a director or officer of Rollway or having served any
other company.
Rollway's Certificate of Incorporation provides that Rollway will indemnify
and hold harmless each director and officer of Rollway from and against any and
all claims and liabilities to which he may be or become subject by reason of
his being or having been a director and/or officer or by reason of his alleged
acts or omissions as a director and/or officer, and indemnify against, and
reimburse each officer and director for, any and all expenses reasonably
incurred by him in connection with any pending or threatened action, suit or
proceeding, to which he may be or become subject by reason of his being or
having been a director and/or officer or by reason of his alleged acts or
omissions as a director and/or officer; provided, however, that no director or
officer shall be indemnified against any claim or liability or indemnified
against or reimbursed for any expenses incurred in any action suit or
proceeding which shall be finally adjudged to have arisen out of his own
negligence or wilful misconduct, or indemnified against any compromise of any
such alleged claim or liability unless said compromise be approved by a
majority of the shareholders present at the meeting discussing such compromise.
The foregoing right of indemnification is specifically stated to be
nonexclusive of any other rights to which any director or officer may otherwise
be entitled as a matter of law.
Missouri law authorizes a Missouri corporation to indemnify a director,
officer, employee or agent for actually and reasonably incurred expenses, if
(1) such person acted in good faith, (2) such person acted in a manner
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, (3) with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, such person
had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful, and (4) such
person acted in a manner such that he is not adjudged to be liable for
negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duties to the corporation,
provided, however, that a corporation may indemnify a person who is adjudged to
be liable for negligence or misconduct to the extent that the court in which
the applicable action or suit was brought determines upon application that,
despite the adjudication of liability and in view of all the circumstances of
the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for the
expenses which the court deems proper. Further, a corporation shall indemnify
any such person against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if
he has been successful in defense of such action, suit or proceeding and if
such action, suit or proceeding is one for which the corporation may indemnify
him as provided above. A corporation also possesses the power to give any
further indemnity to any such person, if such further indemnity is either (1)
authorized, directed or provided for in the articles of incorporation of the
corporation or any duly adopted amendment thereof or (2) is authorized,
<PAGE> 93
directed or provided for in any By-Law or agreement of the corporation which
has been adopted by a vote of the shareholders of the corporation; provided
that no such indemnity shall indemnify any person from or on account of such
person's conduct which was finally adjudged to have been knowingly fraudulent,
deliberately dishonest or willful misconduct.
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on February 10, 1987, Emerson's
shareholders approved indemnification agreements with the directors of Emerson
and amendments to the By-Laws of Emerson which incorporate indemnity provisions
as described above. The amended By-Laws provide that Emerson will indemnify
its directors and officers against all expenses (including attorneys' fees),
judgments, fines and settlement amounts, paid or incurred in any action or
proceeding, including any action by or on behalf of Emerson, on account of
their service as a director or officer of Emerson, any subsidiary of Emerson or
any other company or enterprise when they are serving in such capacities at the
request of Emerson, excepting only cases where (1) the conduct of such person
is adjudged to be knowingly fraudulent, deliberately dishonest or willful
misconduct, (2) a final court adjudication shall determine that such
indemnification is not lawful, (3) judgment is rendered against such person for
an accounting of profits made from a purchase or sale of securities of Emerson
in violation of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act or of any similar statutory
law, and (4) any remuneration paid to such person is adjudicated to have been
paid in violation of law. Such person shall be indemnified only to the extent
that the aggregate of losses to be indemnified exceeds the amount of such
losses for which the director or officer is insured pursuant to any directors'
or officers' liability insurance policy maintained by Emerson. Emerson
maintains directors' and officers' liability insurance. Missouri law does not
contain any provisions allowing the limitation of liability of a director or
officer.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of Emerson
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, Emerson has been advised
that in the opinion of the Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Shareholder Meetings
New York law provides that special meetings of shareholders may be called
by the board of directors and by such other person or persons as may be
authorized to do so by the corporation's Certificate of Incorporation or By-
Laws. Rollway's By-Laws provide that special meeting of shareholders may be
called at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the President or Secretary of
the corporation on the order of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the
Secretary of Rollway will call a special meeting upon the written request of
the shareholders of record of a majority of shares of Rollway entitled to vote
at such special meeting.
Missouri law provides that a special meeting of the shareholders may be
called by the Board of Directors or as otherwise specified in a corporation's
Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws. Pursuant to Emerson's Restated Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws, special meetings of Emerson shareholders may be
convened only by the Board of Directors, by the holders of at least eighty-five
percent of all outstanding shares entitled to vote at such a meeting, and by
the Chairman of the Board, Vice Chairman of the Board, President, or Secretary.
Further, Emerson's By-Laws restrict the times during which, and prescribe
<PAGE> 94
procedures under which, a shareholder may propose business at any meeting of
shareholders.
Inspection Rights
Under New York law, a corporation is required to maintain complete books
and records of account, including minutes of the meetings of its shareholders,
board of directors and executive committee, if any, and a shareholder record.
A shareholder who has been a shareholder of record for at least six months or
who holds at least 5% of any class of outstanding shares, (1) upon written
request of such shareholder, has the right to receive an annual balance sheet
and profit and loss statement for the preceding fiscal year, and, if already
distributed to its shareholders or otherwise made available to the public, the
most recent interim balance sheet or profit and loss statement and (2) has the
right, during usual business hours, to examine (and make extracts from) the
shareholder minutes and record of shareholders, provided, however, that such
inspection may be denied if such shareholder refuses to furnish an affidavit
that such inspection is not for an improper purpose and that he or she has not
sold or offered for sale any list of shareholders of any corporation within the
last five years. Additionally, a person may always apply to the proper court
for an order compelling such inspection.
Under Missouri law, a corporation is required to maintain books and
records, including minutes of the meetings of its shareholders and Board of
Directors and lists of its assets and liabilities, and the names and addresses
of its officers and its shareholders. The shareholders of a Missouri
corporation are entitled to inspect (and make copies of) certain of such books
and records under appropriate circumstances and at proper times, if such
inspection is for a proper purpose.
Action by Consent of Shareholders
Whenever shareholders are required or permitted to take any action by vote,
such action may be taken without a meeting upon written consent of the holders
of all outstanding shares (or less then all outstanding shares if so permitted
by the Certificate of Incorporation or in special provisions of the NYBCL).
Any action that may be taken at a meeting of a Missouri corporation's
shareholders may be taken without a meeting if all of the shareholders entitled
to vote at such a meeting consent in writing to such action. These written
consents have the same effect as a unanimous vote of the shareholders at a
meeting duly held.
Dividends and Repurchases of Stock
New York law permits a solvent New York corporation to declare and pay
dividends or make other distributions on its outstanding shares in cash or in
its bonds or its property, except when such declaration, payment or
distribution would be contrary to the Certificate of Incorporation. No
dividend, however, may be declared or paid when the net assets of the
corporation are below its stated capital or such payment would cause the net
assets of the corporation to be below its stated capital.
Additionally, a solvent New York corporation, subject to its Certificate of
Incorporation, may purchase or redeem its own securities out of surplus. A
<PAGE> 95
solvent New York corporation may purchase, under certain circumstances, or
redeem its securities out of stated capital, provided, however, that such
purchase or redemption shall not reduce net assets below the stated capital.
Rollway's ability to declare and pay dividends on Rollway Common Shares is
restricted by the terms of the Rollway Preferred Stock. See "Information about
Rollway--Description of Preferred Stock."
The Board of Directors of a Missouri corporation is empowered to declare
dividends on its outstanding shares. Unless the Articles of Incorporation
provide otherwise, a dividend may be declared in the form of cash, property or
a corporation's own shares. No dividend, however, may be declared or paid when
the net assets of the corporation are below its stated capital or such payment
would cause the net assets of the corporation to be below its stated capital.
Moreover, no dividends may be paid to any class of shares unless all cumulative
dividends accrued on preferred or special classes of shares entitled to
preferred dividends are fully paid.
In addition, a Missouri corporation has the express power to provide for
the purchase, acquisition or redemption its own securities in its Articles of
Incorporation. A corporation, however, may not purchase or redeem its own
securities when the net assets of the corporation are (or would be caused to
be) below its stated capital, or in the case of preferred stock, (1) when the
price paid for purchasing or redeeming such securities exceeds their stated
redemption price or (2) when the assets after such redemption or purchase are
insufficient to pay any debts of the corporation not otherwise satisfied.
Moreover, when the funds used to redeem or purchase preferred stock come out of
a corporation's stated capital, such amount of stated capital may not exceed
the stated capital represented by such shares, and such shares will be deemed
retired. Emerson's Restated Articles of Incorporation provide for the
redemption of any series of preferred shares in certain circumstances, but
currently Emerson has no outstanding preferred shares.
Amendments to Charter
New York law provides that a New York corporation may amend its Certificate
of Incorporation in any respect provided the amendment contains only provisions
that would be lawful if the certificate were an original certificate filed at
the time of the amendment. To enact an amendment, the board of the corporation
must authorize the amendment followed by the authorization of a majority of the
outstanding shares entitled to vote. The board acting alone can amend the
corporation's address or registered agent for service of process. When an
amendment of the certificate would affect certain substantial rights of the
holders of a class of stock, the NYBCL provides that the enactment of the
amendment requires the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of the
affected class voting as a separate class in addition to a majority of all
outstanding voting shares. If only one or more series of any class, but not
the entire class, are adversely affected by a proposed amendment, then only the
holders of each series whose rights would be adversely affected shall be
entitled to participate in the vote as a separate class.
Missouri law provides that, unless otherwise specified in a corporation's
Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws, the Articles of Incorporation may be
amended by a vote of a majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote on the
proposed amendment; provided, however, that (1) where the Articles of
Incorporation or By-Laws provide for cumulative voting, the Articles of
Incorporation may not be amended to decrease the number of directors to less
than three when the number of votes against a proposal for such a decrease
<PAGE> 96
would be sufficient to elect a director in an election of directors and (2) an
amendment proposing to remove control share acquisitions (as hereinafter
defined) from the ambit of Missouri's control share acquisitions statute,
R.S.Mo. Section 351.407 (as discussed hereafter), may only be adopted by the
vote of two-thirds of all outstanding shares entitled to vote upon such
amendment. Emerson's Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that an
affirmative vote of eighty-five percent of all outstanding shares, voting as a
single class, is required to change certain provisions regarding the number and
classes of directors, the removal of directors, the ability of the Board of
Directors to amend the By-Laws and the convening of special shareholders'
meetings.
Amendments to By-Laws
New York law grants shareholders entitled to elect directors the power to
adopt, amend or repeal By-Laws. If permitted in the Certificate of
Incorporation or by a shareholder-approved By-Law, the board of directors may
also adopt, amend or repeal By-Laws by such vote may be therein specified,
which may be greater than the vote otherwise prescribed by the NYBCL.
Shareholders of a New York corporation retain the right to amend or repeal any
By-Laws adopted by the board of directors. Rollway's By-Laws provide that such
By-Laws may be altered, amended or added to, (1) at any annual or special
meeting called for such purpose by the majority vote of the shareholders at
such meeting and (2) at any regular or special meeting of the Board of
Directors by a majority of the total number of directors, provided, however,
that any alteration, amendment or addition may be altered or repealed by the
shareholders at any meeting.
Missouri law provides that shareholders possess the power to alter or amend
the By-Laws of the corporation, unless and to the extent that such power may be
vested in the board of directors by the Articles of Incorporation. Emerson's
Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that only the Board of Directors
possesses the power to alter or amend the By-Laws, and a vote of the majority
of directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present constitutes the
act of the Board.
Preemptive Rights of Shareholders
Under New York law, unless a Certificate of Incorporation provides
otherwise, shareholders possess certain preemptive rights by operation of law.
In general, these rights allow shareholders whose unlimited dividend rights or
voting rights would be adversely affected by the issuance of additional shares
of stock to purchase, on terms and conditions set by the board of directors,
that proportion of such new issue of stock necessary to preserve the relative
dividend or voting rights of such shareholders. Unless otherwise provided in
the Certificate of Incorporation, certain types of stock are not subject to
preemptive rights. Rollway's Certificate of Incorporation provides for the
waiver of such preemptive rights. Additionally, Rollway's Certificate of
Incorporation provides that any unissued stock or additional authorized issue
of stock may be issued and disposed of pursuant to resolutions of the Board of
Directors of Rollway to such person and on such terms as is advisable by the
Board of Directors in the exercise of its discretion.
Missouri law allows a shareholder's preemptive rights to be limited or
abrogated in the Articles of Incorporation. Emerson's Restated Articles of
<PAGE> 97
Incorporation precludes a shareholder's preemptive rights in respect of both
preferred and common stock.
Control Share Acquisition Provisions
New York law does not contain a statute comparable to Missouri's control
share acquisition statute discussed below.
Under Missouri law, a "control share acquisition" means the acquisition,
directly or indirectly, of either ownership or the power to direct the exercise
of voting power with respect to "control shares," which are defined as shares,
when added to all other shares of the issuing corporation owned by the
acquiring person, that would entitle such person to exercise certain degrees of
voting power with respect to stock of the issuing corporation. Under the
Missouri control share acquisition statute, shareholders who acquire enough
shares to give them (1) one-fifth to one-third, (2) one-third to a majority, or
(3) a majority or more of the outstanding stock of Emerson will not be able to
vote those shares unless certain disclosure requirements are satisfied and the
retention of voting rights by the acquiror is approved by at least a majority
of shares entitled to vote and a majority of all non-interested shares entitled
to vote. A corporation's Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws may provide that
a corporation will not be subject to Missouri's control share acquisition
statute. The Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of Emerson do not exempt
Emerson from Missouri's control share acquisition statute (but see "-- Business
Combinations" below).
Takeover Bid Disclosure Provisions
New York by statute regulates take-over bids. A "take-over bid" means the
acquisition of or offer to acquire, pursuant to a tender offer or request or
invitation for tenders, any equity security of a target company, if after the
acquisition the offeror would, directly or indirectly, be a beneficial owner of
more than five percent of any class of the issued and outstanding equity
securities of such target company. A "take-over bid" does not include an offer
to acquire such equity security solely in exchange for other securities, or the
acquisition of such equity security pursuant to such offer, for the sole
account of the offeror, in good faith and not to avoid New York's statutory
regulation of take-over bids, and not involving any public offering within the
meaning of the Securities Act. The Merger will not constitute a takeover bid
under New York law.
Missouri also regulates take-over bids, which are defined as the
acquisition of or offer to acquire any equity security of a domestic target
company, if after acquisition thereof the offeror would, directly or
indirectly, be a beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of the
issued and outstanding equity securities of such target company. A "take-over
bid" does not include an offer to acquire such equity security solely in
exchange for other securities, or the acquisition of such equity security
pursuant to such offer, for the sole account of the offeror, in good faith and
not to avoid Missouri's statutory regulation of take-over bids, and not
involving any public offering within the meaning of the Securities Act. Unless
the offeror, prior to making a take-over bid, files with the Commissioner of
Securities and delivers to the target company certain materials, including
copies of all offering information, certain information regarding the offeror,
the source of funds financing the offer, the number of shares to be acquired
and whether the offeror intends to sell the assets of the company, the offeror
<PAGE> 98
will be subject to civil monetary and criminal penalties. The Merger will not
constitute a takeover bid under Missouri law because neither Emersub nor
Rollway is a Missouri corporation. (but see "-- Business Combinations" below).
Business Combinations
New York law provides that, generally, for a merger between two or more New
York corporations upon the approval of the holders of two-thirds of all
outstanding shares entitled to vote on the merger and, in certain
circumstances, of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares of each
class or series, is required. However, where the merger is between one or more
New York corporations and one or more foreign corporations, the foregoing two-
thirds vote (and the majority vote if applicable) is required only for the
domestic corporation. The foreign corporation must comply with the applicable
provisions of the jurisdiction where it is incorporated.
Furthermore, under New York law, there are additional restrictions with
respect to "business combinations" involving an "interested shareholder" of a
New York corporation. A "business combination" is (1) any merger or
consolidation of a resident domestic corporation or any of its subsidiaries
with (i) an interested shareholder or (ii) any other corporation (whether or
not itself an interested shareholder) which is, or after the merger or
consolidation would be, an affiliate or associate of an interested shareholder
(each an "Interested Affiliate"); (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other
disposition with an interested shareholder or any Interested Affiliate of
assets of a resident domestic corporation or any of its subsidiaries equal to
(i) 10% or more of the aggregate market value of all the assets of such
corporation, (ii) 10% or more of the aggregate market value of all the
outstanding stock of such corporation or (iii) 10% or more of the earning power
or net income of such corporation; (3) the issuance or transfer by a resident
domestic corporation or any of its subsidiaries of any of its stock or of any
of its subsidiaries stock equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of
all the outstanding stock of such corporation to an interested shareholder or
Interested Affiliate, except pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights to
purchase stock offered, or a dividend or distribution paid pro rata to all
shareholders; (4) the adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or
dissolution of a resident domestic corporation pursuant to any agreement,
arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing) with, an interested
shareholder or Interested Affiliate; (5) any reclassification of securities, or
recapitalization of a resident domestic corporation, or any merger or
consolidation of such corporation with any of its subsidiaries, or any other
transaction (whether or not involving an interested shareholder), pursuant to
any agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing) with,
an interested shareholder or Interested Affiliate, which has the effect, of
increasing the proportionate share of outstanding shares of voting stock (or
securities convertible into voting stock) of such corporation or subsidiary,
which is owned by an interested shareholder or Interested Affiliate, except as
a result of immaterial changes due to fractional share adjustments or (6) any
receipt by an interested shareholder or Interested Affiliate of the benefit of
any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial assistance or any
tax credits or other tax advantages provided by or through a resident domestic
corporation. An "interested shareholder" is one that owns at least 20% of the
outstanding voting shares of a corporation. A New York corporation cannot
engage in a business combination with an interested shareholder for five years
following the acquisition date of an interested shareholder's shares unless the
directors approve the business combination or stock acquisition before the
shareholder's stock acquisition date. Following the five-year period, a
<PAGE> 99
corporation cannot enter a business combination with an interested shareholder
unless (1) the directors approve the business combination or the shareholder's
stock acquisition before the shareholder's stock acquisition date; (2) at a
meeting called for such purpose, the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares not beneficially owned by an interested shareholder or an associate or
affiliate of an interested shareholder approve the business combination; or
(3) the business combination satisfies certain price and procedural
requirements. Such restrictions do not apply to certain specified
corporations, including, without limitation, a corporation that (1) does not
have a class of voting stock registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, with some exceptions,
and (2) has exempted itself (a) in its original certificate of incorporation,
(b) in an amendment to its By-Laws prior to March, 1986 or (c) in an amendment
to its By-Laws approved by a vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding voting stock, excluding the voting stock of an interested
shareholder or an associate or affiliate of an interested shareholder,
provided, however, that such amendment will not become effective for 18 months
following its adoption and will not apply to a business combination with an
interested shareholder whose stock acquisition date is on or before the
effective date of such amendment.
Missouri law provides, generally, that in the case of a merger or
consolidation, at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote must approve
such merger or consolidation, unless the Articles of Incorporation provide
otherwise. Where the merger is between one or more Missouri corporations and
one or more foreign corporations, the foregoing two-thirds vote is required
only for the Missouri corporation. The foreign corporation must comply with
the applicable provisions of the jurisdiction where it is incorporated.
However, under Missouri law, there are also additional restrictions with
respect to business combinations involving an "interested shareholder" of a
Missouri corporation which, for the most part, are nearly identical to those
described above for a New York corporation.
Additionally, Emerson's Restated Articles of Incorporation mandate that all
"business combinations" (as hereinafter defined) must be approved by an
affirmative vote of eighty-five percent of all outstanding shares of Emerson,
voting as a single class. A "business combination" is (1) any merger,
consolidation, or exchange of Emerson's capital shares with an "interested
person" (as hereinafter defined), (2) any sale, lease, exchange, or other
similar disposition, including partial liquidation or dissolution of Emerson,
of a substantial part of the assets of Emerson (or any of its subsidiaries),
other than in the ordinary course of business, with an interested person, (3)
the issuance or transfer of securities of Emerson or a subsidiary to an
interested person or the issuance or transfer of securities of an interested
person to Emerson or any of its subsidiaries, (iv) any sale, lease, exchange,
or other similar disposition of a substantial part of the assets of an
interested person, other than in the ordinary course of business, with Emerson
or any of its subsidiaries, (v) any recapitalization or reclassification of
securities of Emerson or any merger or consolidation of Emerson with any of its
subsidiaries which would effect an increase in the proportionate ownership of
an interested person in Emerson, or (vi) any merger or consolidation of Emerson
with any of its subsidiaries after which the Articles of Incorporation of the
surviving entity would not contain the any of the above provisions.
"Interested person" means any individual or other entity that, at any time
during the two year period prior to and including the date of consummation of
the proposed business combination, owns or owned, directly or indirectly
<PAGE> 100
through a subsidiary or associate, ten percent of the total voting power of all
outstanding shares of Emerson's voting stock.
Furthermore, Emerson's Restated Articles of Incorporation also provide that
a business combination need not be approved by eighty-five percent of all the
outstanding shares of Emerson, voting as a single class, if (1) such business
combination is approved by a majority of directors who are not affiliated or
associated with an interested person and who held office prior to such person
or entity becoming an interested person, or (2) if all of the following
conditions are met: (a) the amount of cash and property received as
consideration for such business combination is equal to or greater than the
highest of (i) the highest per share price paid by the interested party for any
of Emerson's capital stock in the two years preceding the consummation of the
business combination; (ii) the highest preferential amount per share to which
the holders of any class or series of preferred stock are entitled; or (iii)
the fair market value of such shares on the date that the business combination
is announced; (b) the consideration received by the holders of Emerson's
capital stock is in cash or the same form as that used by the interested person
to acquire capital stock in Emerson; (c) certain changes in the payment of
dividends do not occur; (d) the interested person does not receive the benefit
of any loans or tax advantages provided by Emerson; and (e) a proxy statement
meeting the requirements of the Exchange Act is sent to the shareholders at
least 30 days before such business combination is consummated.
Sale, Lease or Exchange of Assets
New York law provides that a sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of
all or substantially all of the assets of a corporation, if not made in the
usual or regular course of business actually conducted by such corporation,
shall be authorized only as follows: (1) the board shall authorize the proposed
sale, lease, exchange or other disposition and direct its submission to a vote
of shareholders, (2) notice of a shareholders meeting shall be given to each
shareholder or record, whether or not entitled to vote, and (3) the
shareholders shall approve such sale, lease, exchange or other disposition and
may fix, or may authorize the board to fix, any of the terms and conditions
thereof. Notwithstanding shareholder approval, the board may abandon the
proposed sale, lease, exchange or other disposition without further action by
the shareholders, subject to the rights, if any, of third parties under any
contract relating thereto.
Missouri law provides that a vote of at least two-thirds of the shares
entitled to vote is required to authorize the sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all of the assets of a corporation, except that the Articles of
Incorporation or the By-Laws may provide that a greater proportion is required
to authorize such a sale, lease or exchange. See " -- Business Combinations"
above for discussion of sales, leases or exchanges of assets with an
"interested person."
Rollway Preferred Stock
The holders of Rollway Preferred Stock are entitled to various rights and
priorities regarding the management and assets of Rollway. For a discussion of
those rights and priorities, see "Information about Rollway -- Description of
Preferred Stock."
<PAGE> 101
Subject to the approval of the Preferred Terms Amendment by the holders of
a majority of Rollway Preferred Stock, upon consummation of the proposed
Merger, the holders of Rollway Preferred Stock will possess shares of Emerson
Common Stock (as described in "Information about Emerson -- Description of
Capital Stock") which will have certain rights under Missouri law and under the
Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of Emerson as described herein.
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
The holders of Rollway Common Stock, Rollway Preferred Stock and/or Rollway
Options, as of the date hereof, do not own any rights with respect to Rollway's
securities which are similar to Emerson's Preferred Share Purchase Rights.
Upon consummation of the Proposed Merger, holders of Rollway Common Stock
(and Rollway Preferred Stock, subject to the approval of the Preferred Terms
Amendment), will receive with their Emerson Common Stock received in the Merger
the Preferred Share Purchase Rights which are currently attached to and trade
with the Emerson Common Shares and which have certain rights as described under
"Information about Emerson -- Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan."
Rights of Dissenting Shareholders
Pursuant to New York law, a shareholder of a New York corporation who is
entitled to vote with respect to certain transactions (including, without
limitation, a merger or consolidation, a disposition of all or substantially
all of the assets of a corporation, or a share exchange) and who complies with
the applicable statutory procedures is entitled to receive in cash the fair
value of his or her shares if the shareholder does not consent to such
transactions. Additionally, shareholders have dissenters' rights in the case
of certain types of amendments of the Certificate of Incorporation. For a more
complete description of the rights of dissenting shareholders under New York
law, see "Dissenting Shareholder Rights."
Similarly, Missouri law provides that a shareholder of a Missouri
corporation who complies with applicable statutory procedures is entitled to
receive fair value for his or her shares if the shareholder votes against
certain transactions, including, without limitation, a merger or consolidation,
a disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of a corporation, or a
share exchange. Also, shareholders have dissenters' rights with respect to
certain amendments that materially and adversely affect rights in respect of a
dissenter's shares as well as any corporate action taken pursuant to a
shareholder vote to the extent that the Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws or
a resolution of the board provides that voting or non-voting shareholders are
entitled to dissent and obtain payment for their shares.
DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
It is a condition to the consummation of the Merger that (i) holders of not
more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Rollway Common Stock shall have
exercised dissenting shareholder rights with respect to the Merger and
(ii) holders of not more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Rollway Preferred
Stock shall have exercised dissenting shareholder rights with respect to the
Preferred Terms Amendment. However, if this condition is waived by Emerson and
Emersub in their sole discretion and the Merger is consummated, any holder of
Rollway Common Stock who elects to exercise his, her or its rights of dissent
<PAGE> 102
from the Merger and who complies with the procedures set forth in Sections 623,
inclusive, of the NYBCL shall be entitled to receive cash for the fair value of
his, her or its shares of Rollway Common Stock owned at the time of the Merger.
Additionally, if the Preferred Terms Amendment is approved, any holder of
Rollway Preferred Stock who elects to exercise his, her or its right to dissent
from the Preferred Terms Amendment and who complies with the procedures set
forth in Section 623, inclusive, of the NYBCL shall be entitled to receive the
"fair value" of his, her or its shares of Rollway Preferred Stock.
Shareholders contemplating the exercise of dissenters' rights should review
carefully Sections 623, 806(b)(6) and 910 of the NYBCL. A copy of the complete
text of such Sections is attached as Exhibit C hereto. The following,
qualified in its entirety by such provisions, is a summary of the steps which
must be taken for the effective exercise of dissenters' rights:
(i) Written Objection. Any shareholder electing to exercise the right of
dissent shall file with Rollway prior to or at the Rollway Special
Meeting and prior to the taking of the vote on the approval of the
applicable action of a written objection stating said shareholder's
intention to demand payment for his, her or its shares if the action
is approved. Such written objection is not required from any
shareholder to whom Rollway did not give notice of such Rollway
Special Meeting in accordance with the NYBCL. A vote against the
proposed action is not, in and of itself, sufficient to meet the
requirement of written objection.
(ii) Voting at the Rollway Special Meeting. In addition to the filing of
the written objection, shares for which dissenters' rights are sought
must not be voted in favor of approval of the applicable action. The
failure to vote against the proposed action does not constitute a
waiver of dissenters' rights, provided that the requirements of the
NYBCL are met.
(iii) Notice of Effectiveness of Action. If the action is approved by the
vote (or written consent) of the requisite number of Rollway's
shareholders, Rollway is required, within ten days of such vote (or
written consent), to send to each dissenting shareholder of Rollway
who properly filed a written objection thereto (or from whom written
objection was not required) and whose shares were not voted in favor
of the approval of the action a notice (the "Company Notice") of such
authorization (or consent).
(iv) Written Demand. Within twenty days after the giving of the Company
Notice, any shareholder from whom written objection was not required
and who elects to dissent shall deliver to Rollway a written notice
(an "Election Notice") of such election.
(v) Delivery of Certificates. Within one month after filing of the
Election Notice (the "Delivery Period"), the shareholder must submit
the certificates representing his shares.
(vi) Offer. Within fifteen days after the later of the expiration of the
Delivery Period or the consummation of the applicable action (the
"Offer Period"), Rollway, as the Surviving Corporation, must make a
written offer (the "Offer") to each dissenting shareholder to pay for
his, her or its shares at a specified price which Rollway considers to
be fair value.
<PAGE> 103
(vii) Payment. If within thirty days after the making of the Offer (the
"Agreement Period"), Rollway and a dissenting shareholder agree upon
the fair value to be paid for the dissenting shares, payment by
Rollway shall be made to the dissenting shareholder within sixty days
after the later of the making of such Offer or the consummation of the
applicable action. If Rollway fails to make the Offer or Rollway and
a dissenting shareholder do not agree on the fair value of the
dissenting shares within the Offer Period or Agreement Period, as the
case may be, Rollway shall institute a special proceeding in the
appropriate state supreme court within twenty days after the Offer
Period or Agreement Period, as the case may be (the "Proceeding
Period"). If Rollway fails to institute such proceeding, the
dissenting shareholder must institute such proceeding within thirty
days after the expiration of the Proceeding Period or lose all
dissenter's rights (unless otherwise directed by the court). Rollway
shall be required to pay the fair value of the dissenting shares as
established by the court. Each party to such proceeding shall bear
its own costs and expenses, although the court may, in its discretion,
assess all or any part of Rollway's costs against any or all
dissenting shareholders and all or any part of any dissenting
shareholder costs against Rollway.
(viii) Cessation of Rights. Upon consummation of the applicable action, any
dissenting shareholder shall cease to have any of the rights of a
shareholder except the right to be paid the fair value of his shares
and any other rights under Section 623 of the NYBCL.
ONCE DISSENTERS RIGHTS ARISE, UNLESS THE AFOREMENTIONED
REQUIREMENTS ARE STRICTLY MET, SHARES OF ROLLWAY STOCK WILL
AUTOMATICALLY LOSE ANY DISSENTERS' RIGHTS.
LEGAL MATTERS
Hancock & Estabrook, LLP has rendered the opinion referred to under "The
Merger -- Certain Federal Income Tax Matters." Hancock & Estabrook, LLP
represents Rollway in this Merger. Hancock & Estabrook, LLP does not represent
the individual shareholders, option holders and employees of Rollway in
connection with the Merger and the transactions contemplated thereby, and such
persons are advised to seek the advice of their own counsel.
H. M. Smith, Esq., Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of
Emerson, has rendered his opinion that the shares of Emerson Common Stock to be
issued in the Merger, when issued pursuant to the terms of the Merger
Agreement, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. As of
March 31, 1996, H. M. Smith owned 2,003 shares of Emerson Common Stock and
options to purchase 7,058 additional shares of Emerson Common Stock.
<PAGE> 104
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Emerson Electric Co. and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 1995 and 1994, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended September 30, 1995 incorporated by reference
herein, have been incorporated herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG Peat
Marwick LLP, independent certified public accounts, incorporated by reference
elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Lipe-Rollway Corporation at
December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994, and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 3, 1995 included in this Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
which is referred to and made a part of the Registration Statement, have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their
report appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such
report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
<PAGE> 105
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .106
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 3, 1995 and
November 27, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended
December 3, 1995, November 27, 1994 and November 28, 1993 . . . . .109
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the fiscal years
ended December 3, 1995, November 27, 1994 and November 28, 1993 . .110
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended
December 3, 1995, November 27, 1994 and November 28, 1993 . . . . .111
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) as of March 3, 1996 . .126
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
for the fiscal quarters ended March 3, 1996 and
February 26, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .127
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited)
for the fiscal quarters ended March 3, 1996 and
February 26, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .128
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the
fiscal quarters ended March 3, 1996 and February 26, 1995 . . . . .129
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . .130
<PAGE> 106
Report of Independent Auditors
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Lipe-Rollway Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lipe-Rollway
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 3, 1995.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Lipe-Rollway
Corporation and subsidiaries at December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 3, 1995, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
As described in Note 1, in 1994 the Company changed its method of accounting
for income taxes.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Syracuse, New York
January 19, 1996
<PAGE> 107
<TABLE>
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
<CAPTION>
December 3, November 27,
1995 1994
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 381,479 $ 59,649
Trade receivables, less allowances of $588,884 and $403,687 10,694,372 8,211,030
Inventories:
Finished goods 8,467,618 6,579,056
Work-in-process 3,018,778 2,432,428
Materials and supplies 1,084,214 942,980
------------ ------------
12,570,610 9,954,464
Due from officer 152,336 139,319
Foreign income, VAT and other taxes refundable 250,573 308,964
Prepaid and other current assets 783,490 746,138
------------ ------------
Total current assets 24,832,860 19,419,564
Other assets 265,104 169,206
Deferred pension cost 562,165 870,782
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization of $12,154 183,646 --
Property, plant, and equipment:
Land ($509,480 and $475,593) and improvements 618,004 604,615
Buildings and improvements 6,084,736 5,859,262
Machinery and equipment 9,639,888 16,005,362
------------ ------------
16,342,628 22,469,239
Less allowances for amortization and depreciation 8,031,681 15,166,632
------------ ------------
8,310,947 7,302,607
------------ ------------
$34,154,722 $27,762,159
============ ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 108
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 3, November 27,
1995 1994
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings $ 8,686,818 $ 2,482,893
Checks outstanding at end of period 501,671 433,405
Trade accounts payable 6,098,269 5,161,985
Accrued expenses 2,505,154 1,364,801
Environmental remediation liability (Note 8) 70,000 --
Income taxes currently payable 10,168 115,480
Current portion of long-term debt 995,224 880,697
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 18,867,304 10,439,261
Long-term debt, less current portion 6,766,808 10,165,439
Deferred taxes 353,502 338,847
Long-term environmental remediation liability (Note 8) 830,000 --
Long-term pension liability 1,134,087 1,869,937
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock issued and outstanding 93,692 shares 936,920 936,920
Common stock, $.50 par value:
Authorized 1,500,000 shares;
Issued 761,898 shares 380,949 380,949
Additional capital 1,386,626 1,386,626
Unfunded pension losses (180,007) (452,934)
Retained earnings 2,590,107 1,883,033
Treasury stock (63,885) (63,885)
Currency translation adjustment 1,152,311 877,966
------------ ------------
6,203,021 4,948,675
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7 and 8)
------------ ------------
$34,154,722 $27,762,159
============ ============
<FN>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 109
<TABLE>
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
<CAPTION>
Year ended
December 3, November 27, November 28,
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $46,493,462 $32,903,821 $32,453,081
Costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold 32,976,505 23,823,149 24,471,706
Selling, general, and administrative expenses 8,728,829 7,453,184 6,957,418
Other administrative expenses (Notes 8 and 11) 1,488,108 -- --
Interest expense 1,746,486 1,208,949 1,021,935
------------ ------------ ------------
44,939,928 32,485,282 32,451,059
------------ ------------ ------------
Income from operations before income taxes 1,553,534 418,539 2,022
Income taxes 846,460 316,951 148,154
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ 707,074 $ 101,588 $ (146,132)
------------ ------------ ------------
Preferred dividend requirement (93,692) (93,692) (93,692)
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock $ 613,382 $ 7,896 $ (239,824)
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) per common share outstanding after dividends on
preferred stock $ .81 $ .01 $ (.32)
============ ============ ============
<FN>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 110
<TABLE>
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
Years ended November 28, 1993, November 27, 1994, and December 3, 1995
<CAPTION>
Unfunded Currency Total
Preferred Common Additional Pension Retained Treasury Translation Shareholders'
Stock Stock Capital Losses Earnings Stock Adjustment Equity
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance
November 29, 1992 $936,920 $380,949 $1,386,626 $(115,847) $2,382,112 $(63,885) $ 813,723 $5,720,598
Adjustment (Note 9) (353,000) (353,000)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Balance
November 29, 1992
as restated 936,920 380,949 1,386,626 (115,847) 2,029,112 (63,885) 813,723 5,367,598
Net loss (146,132) (146,132)
Preferred dividends
$1 per share (101,535) (101,535)
Unfunded pension
losses (121,925) (121,925)
Currency translation
adjustment (462,633) (462,633)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Balance
November 28, 1993 936,920 380,949 1,386,626 (237,772) 1,781,445 (63,885) 351,090 4,535,373
Net income 101,588 101,588
Unfunded pension
losses (215,162) (215,162)
Currency translation
adjustment 526,876 526,876
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Balance
November 27, 1994 936,920 380,949 1,386,626 (452,934) 1,883,033 (63,885) 877,966 4,948,675
Net income 707,074 707,074
Unfunded pension
losses 272,927 272,927
Currency translation
adjustment 274,345 274,345
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Balance
December 3, 1995 $936,920 $380,949 $1,386,626 $(180,007) $2,590,107 $(63,885) $1,152,311 $6,203,021
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== =========== =============
<FN>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 111
<TABLE>
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
<CAPTION>
Year ended
December 3, November 27, November 28,
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating activities
Net income (loss) $ 707,074 $ 101,588 $ (146,132)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 987,736 755,408 630,793
Provision for bad debts 225,261 (37,739) 318,318
Gain on sale of property, plant, and equipment 12,300
Deferred taxes 14,655 4,762 42,591
Provision for noncurrent pension expense (163,095) (53,975) 26,987
Provision for noncurrent environmental remediation
liability 830,000 -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in trade receivables (2,303,511) (1,023,052) (427,510)
(Increase) in inventories (2,182,745) (997,356) (161,881)
(Increase) decrease in due from officer (13,017) (14,975) 12,393
(Increase) decrease in other current assets 130,143 (364,145) (350,282)
Increase in trade accounts payable 813,169 1,308,330 1,175,453
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses 1,116,359 (10,161) (49,265)
Increase (decrease) in taxes payable (116,084) 102,244 4,651
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 58,245 (229,071) 1,076,116
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment (1,540,223) (1,800,146) (375,975)
Proceeds from sale of equipment 13,183 -- --
(Increase) decrease in other noncurrent assets (279,544) (15,822) 29,096
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,806,584) (1,815,968) (346,879)
Financing activities
Proceeds from long-term borrowings 6,498,204 -- --
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease
obligations (2,720,473) (1,272,268) (1,193,535)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings and line of credit 6,544,707 2,679,958 --
Payments on short-term borrowings and line of credit (3,124,219) -- --
Net borrowings (payments) under revolving lines of credit (4,844,813) 849,811 375,898
Preferred stock redemption -- (65,000) (65,000)
Dividends paid -- -- (101,535)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 2,353,406 2,192,501 (984,172)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (283,237) (97,122) 65,601
------------ ------------ ------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 321,830 50,340 (189,334)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 59,649 9,309 198,643
------------ ------------ ------------
<PAGE> 112
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 381,479 $ 59,649 $ 9,309
============ ============ ============
<FN>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 113
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 3, 1995, November 27, 1994, and November 28, 1993
1. Summary of Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all domestic and
foreign subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal Year
The Corporation's fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest November 30. Fiscal
year 1995 included 53 weeks; fiscal years 1994 and 1993 included 52 weeks.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three
months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Foreign Currency Translation
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 52, all
balance sheet accounts of foreign subsidiaries are translated at current
exchange rates and income statement items are translated at an average exchange
rate for the year. The gain or loss resulting from translating subsidiary
financial statements is recorded as a separate component of shareholders'
equity. Transaction gains and losses are recorded in operations.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories, summarized
by cost method, follow:
1995 1994
------------ ------------
Last-in, first-out (LIFO) method $ 6,050,580 $4,590,139
First-in, first-out (FIFO) method 6,520,030 5,364,325
------------ ------------
Total inventories $12,570,610 $9,954,464
============ ============
If the first-in, first-out method of inventory accounting had been used for all
inventories, inventories would have been approximately $4,862,000 and
$4,843,000 higher than reported at December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994,
respectively.
<PAGE> 114
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
1. Summary of Accounting Policies (Continued)
Properties and Depreciation
Properties are recorded at cost and include expenditures for additions and
major improvements and equipment acquired under capital leases. Provisions for
depreciation are based on the estimated useful lives of the respective assets
and are computed by the straight-line method. Capital lease assets aggregated
$2,522,474 and $2,296,587 at December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994,
respectively (accumulated amortization aggregated $1,399,406 and $1,209,583,
respectively). Amortization of capital leases is included with depreciation
expense in the statement of operations.
Income Taxes
The Company does not provide U.S. income taxes on cumulative undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which totaled $3,544,000 and $2,041,000 at
December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994, respectively, because such earnings are
considered as invested indefinitely.
Beginning November 29, 1993, the Company provides for income taxes in
accordance with the liability method as set forth in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under the
liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between
the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted
tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to
reverse. The principal differences relate to depreciation and certain non-
deductible reserves (see Note 5). There was no cumulative effect of the
adoption of the new method of accounting for income taxes.
Prior to 1994, the Company provided for deferred taxes in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion #11.
Pension Plans
Annual costs of the pension plans are computed by actuaries in accordance with
the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87,
"Employers' Accounting for Pensions".
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Earnings (loss) per common share outstanding are based on the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during each year (752,628 in 1995,
1994, and 1993). Earnings per share in each year give effect to the preferred
dividends of $93,692; however, the computation excludes the impact of stock
options as their dilutive effect is not material.
<PAGE> 115
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
1. Summary of Accounting Policies (Continued)
Other Assets
Included in the caption other assets is the cash value of officers' life
insurance of $1,717,193 net of loans of $1,492,739 as of December 3, 1995 and
$1,483,980 net of loans of $1,364,959 as of November 27, 1994.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are being amortized on a straight line basis over the
term of the mortgage loan with a bank (15 years).
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and generally does not require collateral. There are no significant
concentrations of credit risk at December 3, 1995.
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 1994 financial statements have been reclassified to
conform with the 1995 presentation.
2. Borrowing Arrangements
The Company has domestic and foreign lines of credit which provide for
borrowings up to approximately $10,020,000 at December 3, 1995. Borrowings
against these lines of credit aggregated $8,686,818 at December 3, 1995
($6,100,446 domestic and $2,586,372 foreign). Interest on the borrowings is
set as a function of the prime rate.
Equipment, inventory, and receivables are pledged as collateral on these loans
in addition to a mortgage on building facilities and a general assignment of
assets.
The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding as of
December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994 was 10.35% and 9.21%, respectively.
On March 21, 1995, the Company refinanced, with a bank, certain debt owed to
the bank and another financial institution. The Company used the proceeds of
two term loans and an available revolving line of credit to pay short and long-
term borrowings and, as a result, $7,388,224 of short-term borrowings
outstanding as of November 27, 1994 has been classified as long-term debt at
November 27, 1994. The debt is secured by land, buildings, equipment, accounts
receivable and inventory owned by the domestic company.
<PAGE> 116
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Borrowing Arrangements (Continued)
At December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994, long-term obligations consisted of
the following:
December 3, November 27,
1995 1994
------------ ------------
Term loan payable to a bank with monthly principal
and interest installments of $71,363 through April
2002 including interest at prime (8.75% at
December 3, 1995) plus 1.75%, collateralized by a
security interest in all business assets. $3,923,074 $4,200,000
Mortgage loan payable to a bank with monthly
principal and interest installments of $20,318
through April 2010 including interest at prime
(8.75% at December 3, 1995) plus 1.875%,
collateralized by land, building, and fixtures in
Liverpool, New York. 1,771,190 1,800,000
Revolving line of credit, up to a maximum of
$6,500,000, based on the level of qualifying
accounts receivable and inventory. Interest is
payable monthly at prime (8.75% at December 3,
1995) plus 1.25% through April 1, 1996,
collateralized by a security interest in all
business assets. 6,100,446 2,748,097
Foreign term loan payable in semiannual installments
through 2001. Effective interest rate 8.65% and
9.25% in 1995 and 1994, respectively. 1,217,459 1,214,923
Note payable with monthly principal and interest
installments of $5,000 per month through December
2004 including interest at 11.683% (see Note 9). 334,942 353,000
Capitalized lease obligations expiring at various
dates through 1997. Average interest rate was
13.69% and 12.8% for 1995 and 1994, respectively. 515,367 730,116
------------ ------------
13,862,478 11,046,136
Less current maturities of long-term debt 995,224 880,697
Less revolving line of credit 6,100,446 --
------------ ------------
$6,766,808 $10,165,439
============ ============
<PAGE> 117
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Borrowing Arrangements (Continued)
Aggregate maturities of long-term obligations as of December 3, 1995 are as
follows:
1997 $ 953,332
1998 1,014,822
1999 1,044,686
2000 1,084,154
2001 915,302
Thereafter 1,754,512
----------
$6,766,808
==========
Loan Covenants
Terms of the various debt agreements limit, among other things, property,
plant, and equipment additions and require a certain minimum working capital
ratio and a maximum debt to equity ratio. The Company was in compliance with
these terms at December 3, 1995.
Interest Payments
Total interest paid aggregated $1,417,608 in 1995, $963,084 in 1994, and
$874,095 in 1993.
3. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses include the following:
1995 1994
------------ ------------
Salaries, wages, and related items $ 870,666 $ 504,937
Pension and retirement contributions 240,321 81,822
Other accrued items 1,394,167 778,042
------------ ------------
$2,505,154 $1,364,801
============ ============
4. Preferred Stock, Common Stock, and Other Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock
The Company has 250,000 shares authorized of $1 cumulative preferred stock with
a stated par value of $10 per share. The preferred stock is senior to the
Company's common stock, both with respect to the payment of dividends and
liquidation rights. The Company has the option to redeem outstanding shares at
the liquidating preference of $20 per share.
<PAGE> 118
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
4. Preferred Stock, Common Stock, and Other Shareholders' Equity (Continued)
As of December 3, 1995, the Company has dividends in arrears of $187,384 on the
$1 cumulative preferred stock.
Common Stock
Included in shares issued at December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994 are 9,270
shares of treasury stock which were repurchased at a total cost of $63,885.
Stock Options
In 1995 the Board of Directors, with the approval of the Company's
shareholders, reserved for issuance 80,000 shares of stock under the Lipe-
Rollway Corporation 1994 Performance Stock Option Plan. Options for 73,332
shares were granted at $1.80 per share. During 1995 an option for 6,666 shares
was forfeited. No shares were exercised during the year; and under terms of
the original option plan, options for 36,667 shares are exercisable at
December 3, 1995. However, in connection with normal option provisions related
to changes in control, the option committee of the Board of Directors is
expected to amend the plan and options granted to provide that all options
shall become vested and exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of
a pending acquisition (see Note 11).
5. Income Taxes
The components of income (loss) from operations before income taxes consisted
of the following:
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
Domestic $ (780,892) $(201,742) $(286,672)
Foreign 2,334,426 620,281 288,694
------------ ------------ ------------
$1,553,534 $ 418,539 $ 2,022
============ ============ ============
Effective November 29, 1993, the Company changed its method of accounting for
income taxes from the deferred method to the liability method required by FASB
Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". As permitted under the new
rules, prior years financial statements have not been restated. There was no
cumulative effect of adopting Statement 109.
<PAGE> 119
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
5. Income Taxes (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components
of the Company's net deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 3, 1995
and November 27, 1994 are as follows:
1995 1994
------------ ------------
Deferred tax liability:
Tax over book depreciation $ 778,084 $ 691,376
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax liability 778,084 691,376
Deferred tax assets:
Federal net operating loss carryforward 2,152,019 2,044,930
Postretirement benefits 167,527 204,642
Inventory related 603,435 568,001
Insurance reserves 130,517 106,948
Environmental reserve 306,000 --
Other - net 19,127 80,814
State net operating loss carryforward 332,297 315,761
Investment tax credits 359,602 265,529
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets (3,645,942) (3,234,096)
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax assets 424,582 352,529
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax liability $ 353,502 $ 338,847
============ ============
The net deferred tax liabilities have been classified as long term and relate
solely to tax over book depreciation of a foreign subsidiary. The valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets results from the inability to determine the
recoverability of the deferred tax assets due to the cumulative domestic tax
loss.
Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
Liability Deferred
Method Method
-------------------------- ------------
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
Currently payable:
Federal $ -- $ -- $ --
State 1,477 6,685 641
Foreign 830,328 305,504 104,922
------------ ------------ ------------
Total current 831,805 312,189 105,563
Deferred:
Foreign 14,655 4,762 42,591
------------ ------------ ------------
Provision for income taxes $846,460 $316,951 $148,154
============ ============ ============
<PAGE> 120
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
5. Income Taxes (Continued)
Income taxes paid (net) were $918,996 in 1995, $192,641 in 1994, and $101,326
in 1993.
At December 3, 1995, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $6,329,000 which are available to offset future taxable income,
expiring in various years through 2010. In addition, the Company has unused
federal and state investment tax credits of approximately $360,000 for tax
purposes to offset future taxes through the year 2005.
A reconciliation of income tax at the statutory U.S. rate and the actual tax as
recorded follows:
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
Tax at statutory rate $528,202 $142,303 $ 687
State income taxes 1,477 6,685 641
Foreign income taxes at other than
statutory rate 51,278 99,370 49,357
Change in deferred tax asset
valuation allowance 282,446 45,006 --
Other non-deductible items, net (16,943) 23,587 9,342
Domestic loss with no tax benefit -- -- 88,127
------------ ------------ ------------
Tax as recorded $846,460 $316,951 $148,154
============ ============ ============
6. Benefit Plans
The Company has defined benefit retirement plans covering substantially all of
its hourly employees. Benefits are based on a monthly flat rate multiplied by
the years of credited service. The Company's funding policy is to contribute
amounts to the Plans sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements set
forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, plus such
additional amounts as the Company may determine to be appropriate from time to
time.
The Company also sponsors a defined contribution retirement plan covering
certain salaried employees. The Company contributes 4% of each plan
participant's covered compensation. Costs of the Plan are summarized below.
The Company also has employees in certain foreign countries that are covered by
defined contribution plans. Related costs charged to operations are not
material.
<PAGE> 121
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
6. Benefit Plans (Continued)
A summary of net periodic pension cost for 1995, 1994, and 1993 follows:
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
Service cost--benefits earned during
the period $ 102,190 $ 128,751 $ 108,397
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation 661,881 644,460 632,494
Actual return on plan assets (1,067,791) 127,299 (540,820)
Net amortization and deferral 527,106 (727,736) 47,393
------------ ------------ ------------
Net pension cost for defined benefit
plans 223,386 172,774 247,464
Defined contribution plan costs 138,660 107,344 111,582
------------ ------------ ------------
Net pension expense $ 362,046 $280,118 $359,046
============ ============ ============
The primary assumptions used in the accounting for the defined benefit plans as
of December 3, 1995, November 27, 1994, and November 28, 1993 were:
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
Weighted average discount rates 8.5% 8.5% 8%
Expected long-term rate of return on
assets 11.0% 11.0% 9%
The following table sets forth the funding status and amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets at December 3, 1995 and November 27, 1994 for the
Company's defined benefit pension plans:
1995 1994
------------ ------------
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Vested benefit obligation $(8,057,531) $(8,079,799)
Nonvested benefit obligation (8,349) (34,656)
------------ ------------
Accumulated benefit obligation $(8,065,880) $(8,114,455)
============ ============
Actuarial present value of projected benefit
obligations for services rendered to date $(8,065,880) $(8,114,455)
Plan assets at fair value 6,691,472 6,161,216
------------ ------------
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets (1,374,408) (1,953,239)
Unrecognized net loss 83,753 525,654
Unrecognized prior service cost 163,137 186,108
Unrecognized net obligation at end of year, net of
amortization 529,279 613,434
------------ ------------
Net pension liability recognized in the statement of
financial position $ (598,239) $ (628,043)
============ ============
<PAGE> 122
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
6. Benefit Plans (Continued)
The components of the net pension liability are as follows:
1995 1994
------------ ------------
Prepaid pension expense (asset) $ 33,997 $ --
Minimum liability deferred pension cost (asset) 562,165 870,782
Accrued pension cost (accrued expenses) (240,321) (81,822)
Long-term pension liability (1,134,087) (1,869,937)
Unfunded pension loss (equity component) 180,007 452,934
------------ ------------
$ (598,239) $ (628,043)
============ ============
The increase in the weighted average discount rates and in the expected long-
term rates of return has caused a decrease in the defined benefit plan's
projected benefit obligation by $390,000 in 1994. The increase in the expected
long-term rate of return also caused a decrease in the net pension expense by
$117,000 in 1994.
The Plan's assets are invested in government securities, corporate bonds,
common stocks, insurance company separate accounts, and unallocated insurance
contracts.
7. Operating Lease Commitments
The Company leases certain of its manufacturing and sales facilities and
equipment, trucks, and automobiles under cancelable and noncancelable
agreements. Rental expense charged to operations was $163,424 in 1995,
$225,775 in 1994, and $214,635 in 1993.
The future minimum rental commitments, as of December 3, 1995, for all
noncancelable operating leases are as follows:
Machinery
Total & Equipment Automobiles
------------ ------------ ------------
1996 $130,631 $ 41,590 $ 89,041
1997 94,128 37,922 56,206
1998 47,211 34,254 12,957
1999 34,254 34,254 --
2000 6,158 6,158 --
------------ ------------ ------------
$312,382 $154,178 $158,204
============ ============ ============
The Company incurred capital lease obligations totaling $380,298 in 1995,
$273,064 in 1994 and $135,599 in 1993 in connection with lease agreements to
acquire equipment.
<PAGE> 123
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
8. Contingencies
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its
business. Some of the matters are in their early stages of discovery and
consequently management is unable to determine their ultimate effect on the
Company. Management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, resulting
from these actions will not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations and net cash flows.
In connection with "Note 9", three former employees of the Company were
indicted on December 7, 1994. The employees were found not guilty of the
charges made and the Company has expensed legal costs associated with their
defense approximating $270,000. The Company is seeking reimbursement of a
portion of these costs from its insurance carrier under its directors and
officers liability policy. The outcome of the recovery is not determinable at
this time.
As part of the due diligence process, Emerson Electric Company, a party to a
proposed transaction (see Note 11) and the Company have identified certain
environmental issues related to the Company. The nature and scope of these
matters is set forth in certain reports entitled "Environmental Site Assessment
of Lipe-Rollway Corporation in Liverpool, New York" prepared by Environmental
Strategies Corporation dated November 28, 1995 and "Environmental Site
Assessment Groundwater Investigation Results" prepared by Environmental
Strategies Corporation dated November 30, 1995 (hereinafter the "ESC Reports").
These matters have been referred to the appropriate governmental authorities as
required. Rough estimates of the potential costs of remediation associated
with these matters have been made which indicate a range of costs between
$900,000 and $2,300,000; however, significantly more site characterization will
have to be performed prior to arriving at a reliable estimate. The Company,
because it cannot determine what amount within the estimated range represents a
better estimate than another amount, has recorded a $900,000 liability at
December 3, 1995. Management, in conjunction with its environmental advisors,
has estimated that $70,000 of this liability will be incurred during the
ensuing fiscal year and consequently the remainder of the liability has been
shown as a long-term liability.
In addition to the above, the Company as part of its due diligence has
determined that it has failed to make certain filings required under the
Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (42 USC Section 1101 et.
seq.). Although it is possible that the Company could be subject to certain
civil penalties for such non-compliance, at this time the likelihood of
incurring such penalties is unknown.
9. Settlement and Prior Period Adjustment
The Company was involved in discussions with the Department of Defense related
to certain contract pricing issues. In December 1994, the Company reached an
agreement with the United States Government calling for the repayment of
<PAGE> 124
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
9. Settlement and Prior Period Adjustment (Continued)
$353,000 of revenue recognized by the Company in 1991 that was erroneously
charged to the United States Government by the Company. The repayment
represents the specific amounts overcharged to the Government on a certain
contract and consequently the repayment has been treated as a prior period
adjustment. Repayment of the above amount will be made over ten years on a
monthly basis at $5,000 per month, including interest at 11.683%. Such
principal amount is included in long-term debt. The Company has the right to
accelerate the payment of the principal amount outstanding subject to certain
prepayment penalties. In addition to the repayment, the Company was subject to
a $30,000 fine which has been included in administrative expenses in fiscal
1994 and was paid in fiscal 1995. In connection with the acquittal of the
three employees discussed in Note 8, the Company is seeking a reduction of the
balance due the Government; however, the reduction, if any, is unknown at this
time.
10. Operations by Industry Segment and Geographic Area
The Company's segments include Bearing Products and Automation Equipment
Products. Operations by industry segment are summarized as follows:
Year Ended
December 3, November 27, November 28,
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
NET SALES
Bearing Products $43,569,137 $29,747,797 $29,530,825
Automation Equipment Products 2,924,325 3,156,024 2,922,256
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL NET SALES $46,493,462 $32,903,821 $32,453,081
============ ============ ============
PRETAX INCOME
Bearing Products $ 3,195,243 $ 1,320,978 $ 772,739
Automation Equipment Products 104,777 306,510 251,218
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 3,300,020 1,627,488 1,023,957
Interest expense 1,746,486 1,208,949 1,021,935
------------ ------------ ------------
PRETAX INCOME $ 1,553,534 $ 418,539 $ 2,022
============ ============ ============
IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS
Bearing Products $32,357,550 $26,197,961 $21,690,252
Automation Equipment Products 1,797,172 1,564,198 831,237
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $34,154,722 $27,762,159 $22,521,489
============ ============ ============
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Bearing Products $ 1,421,823 $ 1,348,358 $ 343,389
Automation Equipment Products 118,400 451,788 32,586
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,540,223 $ 1,800,146 $ 375,975
============ ============ ============
<PAGE> 125
Lipe-Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
10. Operations by Industry Segment and Geographic Area (Continued)
Year Ended
December 3, November 27, November 28,
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Bearing Products $963,911 $738,813 $620,510
Automation Equipment Products 23,825 16,595 10,283
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION $987,736 $755,408 $630,793
============ ============ ============
Sales between industry segments are not significant. Operating profit is total
revenue, less expenses related to the segments' operating revenue. In
computing operating profit, interest expense has been excluded.
Operations by geographic areas are summarized as follows:
Year Ended
December 3, November 27, November 28,
1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------
NET SALES
United States $22,201,710 $18,830,377 $19,774,192
Europe 24,291,752 14,073,444 12,678,889
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL NET SALES $46,493,462 $32,903,821 $32,453,081
============ ============ ============
OPERATING PROFIT
United States $ 543,964 $ 649,415 $ 468,754
Europe 2,756,056 978,073 555,203
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL OPERATING PROFIT $ 3,300,020 $ 1,627,488 $ 1,023,957
============ ============ ============
IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS
United States $17,508,720 $ 9,329,637 $ 6,281,916
Europe 16,646,002 18,432,522 16,239,573
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $34,154,722 $27,762,159 $22,521,489
============ ============ ============
11. Pending Transaction
In November 1995, the Company entered into an agreement in principle with
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) for the acquisition of the Company by EMR. The
Company would become part of the Emerson Power Transmission subsidiary of EMR.
The proposed transaction is subject to certain conditions, finalization of
definitive merger agreements, completion of governmental filings, and approval
by the Company's shareholders. Costs incurred in connection with merger
activities amounted to approximately $318,000 in fiscal 1995.
<PAGE> 126
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
March 3, 1996
-------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash $ 179,684
Accounts Receivable - net 11,809,343
Inventories 13,814,552
Foreign income taxes recoverable 409,530
Other current assets 865,901
-------------
Total Current Assets 27,079,010
Other Assets 328,547
Deferred Pension Cost 562,165
Property, Plant & Equipment - net 8,094,093
-------------
$36,063,815
=============
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt $10,213,498
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 9,889,380
Other liabilities 276,070
-------------
Total Current Liabilities 20,378,948
Long-Term Debt 6,580,296
Deferred Taxes 364,378
Other Long-Term Liabilities 830,000
Long-Term Pension Liability 1,134,087
Common Stock, $.50 par value:
Authorized 1,500,000 shares;
Issued 761,898 380,949
Preferred Stock and Other Shareholders' Equity 6,395,157
-------------
$36,063,815
=============
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 127
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
Thirteen Weeks Ended
------------------------------------
March 3, 1996 February 26, 1995
----------------- -----------------
Net Sales $12,105,255 $9,884,370
Costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold 8,446,543 6,988,712
Selling, general and administrative expense 2,301,260 2,098,552
Interest expense 418,936 352,466
----------------- -----------------
11,166,739 9,439,730
----------------- -----------------
Income before income taxes 938,516 444,640
Income taxes 205,656 108,836
----------------- -----------------
Net income $ 732,860 $ 335,804
================= =================
Net income applicable to common stock $709,437 $312,381
================= =================
Income per common share after giving
effect to preferred dividends $0.94 $0.42
================= =================
Weighted average shares outstanding 752,628 752,628
================= =================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 128
<TABLE>
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
<CAPTION>
Unfunded Currency Total
Preferred Common Additional Pension Retained Treasury Translation Shareholder's
Stock Stock Capital Losses Earnings Stock Adjustment Equity
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance
November 27, 1994 $936,920 $380,949 $1,386,626 ($452,934) $1,883,033 ($63,885) $877,966 $4,948,675
Net income 335,804 335,804
Currency
translation
adjustment 339,057 339,057
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Balance
February 26, 1995 $936,920 $380,949 $1,386,626 ($452,934) $2,218,837 ($63,885) $1,217,023 $5,623,536
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== =========== =============
Balance
December 3, 1995 $936,920 $380,949 $1,386,626 ($180,007) $2,590,107 ($63,885) $1,152,311 $6,203,021
Net Income 732,860 732,860
Currency
translation
adjustment (159,775) (159,775)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -------------
Balance
March 3, 1996 $936,920 $380,949 $1,386,626 ($180,007) $3,322,967 ($63,885) $ 992,536 $6,776,106
========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ========== =========== =============
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 129
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Thirteen Weeks Ended
------------------------------------
March 3, 1996 February 26, 1995
----------------- -----------------
CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES ($735,332) ($375,178)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of Property, Plant and
Equipment (38,289) (351,424)
Decrease in other assets 120,203 1,507
----------------- -----------------
81,914 (349,917)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on Long-Term Debt
and Capital Lease obligations (202,186) (275,195)
Net borrowings under Revolving Lines
of Credit 643,204 1,244,220
----------------- -----------------
441,018 969,025
Effect of Exchange Rate changes on Cash 10,605 (6,613)
----------------- -----------------
(DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH ($201,795) $237,317
================= =================
See noes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE> 130
Lipe Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
March 3, 1996
Note A - Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for
a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month
period ended March 3, 1996 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ended December 1, 1996. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included
in the Lipe Rollway Corporation and Subsidiaries' financial statements for the
year ended December 3, 1995.
Note B - Inventories
The components of inventory consist of the following:
March 3, 1996 December 3, 1995
----------------- -----------------
Raw material $ 1,133,581 $ 1,084,214
Work in process 3,226,341 3,018,778
Finished products 9,454,630 8,467,618
----------------- -----------------
$13,814,552 $12,570,610
================= =================
Note C - Contingencies
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to its
business. Some of the matters are in their early stages of discovery and
consequently management is unable to determine their ultimate effect on the
Company. Management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, resulting
from these actions will not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position.
<PAGE> 131
EXHIBIT A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
[TO BE SUPPLIED BY AMENDMENT]
<PAGE> 132
EXHIBIT B
MPI MANAGEMENT PLANNING, INC.
101 Poor Farm Road . P.O. Box 611 . Princeton, NJ 08542
(609) 924-4200 Facsimile . (609) 924-4573
March 25, 1996
CONFIDENTIAL
Board of Directors
LIPE-ROLLWAY CORPORATION
c/o Donald A. Denton, Esq.
HANCOCK & ESTABROOK, LLP
1500 Mony Tower 1
Syracuse, New York 13221
Gentlemen:
We understand that Emerson Electric Co. ("Emerson") has made a proposal (the
"Offer") to acquire all of the 752,628 outstanding shares of common stock of
Lipe-Rollway Corporation ("Lipe-Rollway") and all of the outstanding options to
acquire 66,666 shares of common stock of Lipe-Rollway for a gross aggregate
consideration of $8,269,936 subject to adjustment as described in the draft of
the Merger Agreement between Emerson and Lipe-Rollway. In addition, the
preferred stock of Lipe-Rollway would be converted into Emerson common stock at
the rate of $20 worth of Emerson common stock for each of the 93,692
outstanding shares of Lipe-Rollway nonredeemable preferred stock or
alternatively would be redeemed for $20 cash per share. The transaction will
be a merger in which the aforementioned Lipe-Rollway common stock, options and
preferred shares not redeemed for cash are converted into Emerson common stock.
Emerson common stock presently carries The Value Investment Survey's highest
rating for safety, and Standard & Poor's predicts that Emerson is likely to
remain a high quality investment. The terms and conditions of the Offer are
described fully in the aforementioned Merger Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the total consideration to be
received by the holders of the shares of Lipe-Rollway common stock (including
option holders) and preferred stock pursuant to the Offer is fair to the
shareholders of Lipe-Rollway from a financial point of view.
Since 1939, Management Planning, Inc. ("MPI") has been engaged in the valuation
of businesses and their securities for corporate, tax and other purposes,
including financing, recapitalizations, purchases and sales of closely held
securities, estate, gift and income tax matters, and mergers and acquisitions.
In conducting our analysis and arriving at our opinion as expressed herein, we
have conducted such studies, analyses and investigations as we deemed
appropriate under the circumstances. We have also taken into account our
assessment of general economic, industry, market, and financial conditions, as
well as our experience in connection with similar transactions in securities in
general. Among other things, we:
(1) Considered the draft of the Merger Agreement, reviewed by
Lipe-Rollway's Board of Directors;
(2) Reviewed and analyzed financial data regarding Lipe-Rollway,
including its audited and unaudited consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal years ended approximately
November 30, 1985-1995;
<PAGE> 133
Lipe-Rollway Corporation
March 25, 1996
Page No. 2
(3) Reviewed and analyzed other relevant financial and operating
data supplied by Lipe-Rollway;
(4) Discussed past and current operations, financial condition,
and future prospects of Lipe-Rollway with members of its
senior management;
(5) Prepared a comparative analysis of Lipe-Rollway and certain
publicly held companies that we deemed reasonably similar to
Lipe-Rollway with respect to financial and operating results
and investment characteristics;
(6) Compared the proposed financial terms of the Offer with the
financial terms of certain other mergers and acquisitions
which we deemed to be relevant;
(7) Reviewed the premiums in value paid for control in certain
recent business combinations of companies operating in a
variety of industries;
(8) Prepared a discounted net cash flow analysis; and
(9) Reviewed historical prices and trading activity of
Lipe-Rollway common stock.
In preparing our opinion, we have relied, without independent verification, on
the accuracy, completeness, and fairness of all financial and other information
that was publicly available or furnished to us by Lipe-Rollway. Additionally,
we have not made any independent valuation or appraisal of any of the assets or
liabilities of Lipe-Rollway. Our opinion is necessarily based on economic,
market and other conditions in effect on, and the information made available to
us as of, the date hereof.
It is understood that our opinion is for the information of the Board of
Directors of Lipe-Rollway only and is not to be quoted or referred to, in whole
or in part, in any prospectus, proxy statement, or in any other written
document used in connection with the Offer, nor shall our opinion be used for
any other purposes, without the express written permission of Management
Planning, Inc. Specific approval is hereby granted for our opinion to be
described within and attached to the Lipe-Rollway Proxy Statement, and written
permission for other uses will not be unreasonably withheld.
Based on our review and analysis, it is our opinion that the consideration
offered for all of the outstanding common stock (including common shares
issuable upon conversion of options), payable in shares of Emerson common
stock, and a conversion price of $20 per share for each share of outstanding
preferred stock of Lipe-Rollway payable in shares of common stock of Emerson
common stock or in cash, is adequate and does constitute fair consideration to
the shareholders of Lipe-Rollway from a financial point of view.
<PAGE> 134
Lipe-Rollway Corporation
March 25, 1996
Page No. 3
Very respectfully yours,
MANAGEMENT PLANNING, INC.
By /s/ James W. Brockardt
-----------------------------------------
James W. Brockardt, CBA
Vice President
By /s/ Roy H. Meyers
-----------------------------------------
Roy H. Meyers, CFA
Vice President
<PAGE> 135
EXHIBIT C
NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW
SECTIONS 623, 806(b)(6) AND 910
623 PROCEDURE TO ENFORCE SHAREHOLDER'S
RIGHT TO RECEIVE PAYMENT FOR SHARES
(a) A shareholder intending to enforce his right under a section of this
chapter to receive payment for his shares if the proposed corporate action
referred to therein is taken shall file with the corporation, before the
meeting of shareholders at which the action is submitted to a vote, or at such
meeting but before the vote, written objection to the action. The objection
shall include a notice of his election to dissent, his name and residence
address, the number and classes of shares as to which he dissents and a demand
for payment of the fair value of his shares if the action is taken. Such
objection is not required from any shareholder to whom the corporation did not
give notice of such meeting in accordance with this chapter or where the
proposed action is authorized by written consent of shareholders without a
meeting.
(b) Within ten days after the shareholders' authorization date, which term
as used in this section means the date on which the shareholders' vote
authorizing such action was taken, or the date on which such consent without a
meeting was obtained from the requisite shareholders, the corporation shall
give written notice of such authorization or consent by registered mail to each
shareholder who filed written objection or from whom written objection was not
required, excepting any shareholder who voted for or consented in writing to
the proposed action and who thereby is deemed to have elected not to enforce
his right to receive payment for his shares.
(c) Within twenty days after the giving of notice to him, any shareholder
from whom written objection was not required and who elects to dissent shall
file with the corporation a written notice of such election, stating his name
and residence address, the number and classes of shares as to which he dissents
and a demand for payment of the fair value of his shares. Any shareholder who
elects to dissent from a merger under section 905 (Merger of subsidiary
corporation) or paragraph (c) of section 907 (Merger or consolidation of
domestic and foreign corporations) or from a share exchange under paragraph (g)
of section 913 (Share exchanges) shall file a written notice of such election
to dissent within twenty days after the giving to him of a copy of the plan of
merger or exchange or an outline of the material features thereof under section
905 or 913.
(d) A shareholder may not dissent as to less than all of the shares, as to
which he has a right to dissent, held by him of record, that he owns
beneficially. A nominee or fiduciary may not dissent on behalf of any
beneficial owner as to less than all of the shares of such owner, as to which
such nominee or fiduciary has a right to dissent, held of record by such
nominee or fiduciary.
(e) Upon consummation of the corporate action, the shareholder shall cease
to have any of the rights of a shareholder except the right to be paid the fair
value of his shares and any other rights under this section. A notice of
election may be withdrawn by the shareholder at any time prior to his
acceptance in writing of an offer made by the corporation, as provided in
paragraph (g), but in no case later than sixty days from the date of
consummation of the corporate action except that if the corporation fails to
make a timely offer, as provided in paragraph (g), the time for withdrawing a
notice of election shall be extended until sixty days from the date an offer is
<PAGE> 136
made. Upon expiration of such time, withdrawal of a notice of election shall
require the written consent of the corporation. In order to be effective,
withdrawal of a notice of election must be accompanied by the return to the
corporation of any advance payment made to the shareholder as provided in
paragraph (g). If a notice of election is withdrawn, or the corporate action
is rescinded, or a court shall determine that the shareholder is not entitled
to receive payment for his shares, or the shareholder shall otherwise lose his
dissenter's rights, he shall not have the right to receive payment for his
shares and he shall be reinstated to all his rights as a shareholder as of the
consummation of the corporate action, including any intervening preemptive
rights and the right to payment of any intervening dividend or other
distribution or, if any such rights have expired or any such dividend or
distribution other than in cash has been completed, in lieu thereof, at the
election of the corporation, the fair value thereof in cash as determined by
the board as of the time of such expiration or completion, but without
prejudice otherwise to any corporate proceedings that may have been taken in
the interim.
(f) At the time of filing the notice of election to dissent or within one
month thereafter the shareholder of shares represented by certificates shall
submit the certificates representing his shares to the corporation, or to its
transfer agent, which shall forthwith note conspicuously thereon that a notice
of election has been filed and shall return the certificates to the shareholder
or other person who submitted them on his behalf. Any shareholder of shares
represented by certificates who fails to submit his certificates for such
notation as herein specified shall, at the option of the corporation exercised
by written notice to him within forty-five days from the date of filing of such
notice of election to dissent, lose his dissenter's rights unless a court, for
good cause shown, shall otherwise direct. Upon transfer of a certificate
bearing such notation, each new certificate issued therefor shall bear a
similar notation together with the name of the original dissenting holder of
the shares and a transferee shall acquire no rights in the corporation except
those which the original dissenting shareholder had at the time of the
transfer.
(g) Within fifteen days after the expiration of the period within which
shareholders may file their notices of election to dissent, or within fifteen
days after the proposed corporate action is consummated, whichever is later
(but in no case later than ninety days from the shareholders' authorization
date), the corporation or, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the
surviving or new corporation, shall make a written offer by registered mail to
each shareholder who has filed such notice of election to pay for his shares at
a specified price which the corporation considers to be their fair value. Such
offer shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the aggregate number of
shares with respect to which notices of election to dissent have been received
and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. If the corporate action
has been consummated, such offer shall also be accompanied by (1) advance
payment to each such shareholder who has submitted the certificates
representing his shares to the corporation, as provided in paragraph (f), of an
amount equal to eighty percent of the amount of such offer, or (2) as to each
shareholder who has not yet submitted his certificates a statement that advance
payment to him of an amount equal to eighty percent of the amount of such offer
will be made by the corporation promptly upon submission of his certificates.
If the corporate action has not been consummated at the time of the making of
the offer, such advance payment or statement as to advance payment shall be
sent to each shareholder entitled thereto forthwith upon consummation of the
corporate action. Every advance payment or statement as to advance payment
shall include advice to the shareholder to the effect that acceptance of such
<PAGE> 137
payment does not constitute a waiver of any dissenters' rights. If the
corporate action has not been consummated upon the expiration of the ninety day
period after the shareholders' authorization date, the offer may be conditioned
upon the consummation of such action. Such offer shall be made at the same
price per share to all dissenting shareholders of the same class, or if divided
into series, of the same series and shall be accompanied by a balance sheet of
the corporation whose shares the dissenting shareholder holds as of the latest
available date, which shall not be earlier than twelve months before the making
of such offer, and a profit and loss statement or statements for not less than
a twelve month period ended on the date of such balance sheet or, if the
corporation was not in existence throughout such twelve month period, for the
portion thereof during which it was in existence. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the corporation shall not be required to furnish a balance sheet or
profit and loss statement or statements to any shareholder to whom such balance
sheet or profit and loss statement or statements were previously furnished, nor
if in connection with obtaining the shareholders' authorization for or consent
to the proposed corporate action the shareholders were furnished with a proxy
or information statement, which included financial statements, pursuant to
Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission. If within thirty days after the making of such offer the
corporation making the offer and any shareholder agree upon the price to be
paid for his shares, payment therefor shall be made within sixty days after the
making of such offer or the consummation of the proposed corporate action,
whichever is later, upon the surrender of the certificates for any such shares
represented by certificates.
(h) The following procedure shall apply if the corporation fails to make
such offer within such period of fifteen days, or if it makes the offer and any
dissenting shareholder or shareholders fail to agree with it within the period
of thirty days thereafter upon the price to be paid for their shares:
(1) The corporation shall, within twenty days after the expiration of
whichever is applicable of the two periods last mentioned, institute a special
proceeding in the supreme court in the judicial district in which the office of
the corporation is located to determine the rights of dissenting shareholders
and to fix the fair value of their shares. If, in the case of merger or
consolidation, the surviving or new corporation is a foreign corporation
without an office in this state, such proceeding shall be brought in the county
where the office of the domestic corporation, whose shares are to be valued,
was located.
(2) If the corporation fails to institute such proceeding within such
period of twenty days, any dissenting shareholder may institute such proceeding
for the same purpose not later than thirty days after the expiration of such
twenty day period. If such proceeding is not instituted within such thirty day
period, all dissenter's rights shall be lost unless the supreme court, for good
cause shown, shall otherwise direct.
(3) All dissenting shareholders, excepting those who, as provided in
paragraph (g), have agreed with the corporation upon the price to be paid for
their shares, shall be made parties to such proceeding, which shall have the
effect of an action quasi in rem against their shares. The corporation shall
serve a copy of the petition in such proceeding upon each dissenting
shareholder who is a resident of this state in the manner provided by law for
the service of a summons, and upon each nonresident dissenting shareholder
either by registered mail and publication, or in such other manner as is
permitted by law. The jurisdiction of the court shall be plenary and
exclusive.
<PAGE> 138
(4) The court shall determine whether each dissenting shareholder, as
to whom the corporation requests the court to make such determination, is
entitled to receive payment for his shares. If the corporation does not
request any such determination or if the court finds that any dissenting
shareholder is so entitled, it shall proceed to fix the value of the shares,
which, for the purposes of this section, shall be the fair value as of the
close of business on the day prior to the shareholders' authorization date. In
fixing the fair value of the shares, the court shall consider the nature of the
transaction giving rise to the shareholder's right to receive payment for
shares and its effects on the corporation and its shareholders, the concepts
and methods then customary in the relevant securities and financial markets for
determining fair value of shares of a corporation engaging in a similar
transaction under comparable circumstances and all other relevant factors. The
court shall determine the fair value of the shares without a jury and without
referral to an appraiser or referee. Upon application by the corporation or by
any shareholder who is a party to the proceeding, the court may, in its
discretion, permit pretrial disclosure, including, but not limited to,
disclosure of any expert's reports relating to the fair value of the shares
whether or not intended for use at the trial in the proceeding and
notwithstanding subdivision (d) of section 3101 of the civil practice law and
rules.
(5) The final order in the proceeding shall be entered against the
corporation in favor of each dissenting shareholder who is a party to the
proceeding and is entitled thereto for the value of his shares so determined.
(6) The final order shall include an allowance for interest at such
rate as the court finds to be equitable, from the date the corporate action was
consummated to the date of payment. In determining the rate of interest, the
court shall consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which
the corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of
the proceeding. If the court finds that the refusal of any shareholder to
accept the corporate offer of payment for his shares was arbitrary, vexatious
or otherwise not in good faith, no interest shall be allowed to him.
(7) Each party to such proceeding shall bear its own costs and
expenses, including the fees and expenses of its counsel and of any experts
employed by it. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the court may, in its
discretion, apportion and assess all or any part of the costs, expenses and
fees incurred by the corporation against any or all of the dissenting
shareholders who are parties to the proceeding, including any who have
withdrawn their notices of election as provided in paragraph (e), if the court
finds that their refusal to accept the corporate offer was arbitrary, vexatious
or otherwise not in good faith. The court may, in its discretion, apportion
and assess all or any part of the costs, expenses and fees incurred by any or
all of the dissenting shareholders who are parties to the proceeding against
the corporation if the court finds any of the following: (A) that the fair
value of the shares as determined materially exceeds the amount which the
corporation offered to pay; (B) that no offer or required advance payment was
made by the corporation; (C) that the corporation failed to institute the
special proceeding within the period specified therefor; or (D) that the action
of the corporation in complying with its obligations as provided in this
section was arbitrary, vexatious or otherwise not in good faith. In making any
determination as provided in clause (A), the court may consider the dollar
amount or the percentage, or both, by which the fair value of the shares as
determined exceeds the corporate offer.
<PAGE> 139
(8) Within sixty days after final determination of the proceeding, the
corporation shall pay to each dissenting shareholder the amount found to be due
him, upon surrender of the certificates for any such shares represented by
certificates.
(i) Shares acquired by the corporation upon the payment of the agreed
value therefor or of the amount due under the final order, as provided in this
section, shall become treasury shares or be cancelled as provided in section
515 (Reacquired shares), except that, in the case of a merger or consolidation,
they may be held and disposed of as the plan of merger or consolidation may
otherwise provide.
(j) No payment shall be made to a dissenting shareholder under this
section at a time when the corporation is insolvent or when such payment would
make it insolvent. In such event, the dissenting shareholder shall, at his
option:
(1) Withdraw his notice of election, which shall in such event be
deemed withdrawn with the written consent of the corporation; or
(2) Retain his status as a claimant against the corporation and, if it
is liquidated, be subordinated to the rights of creditors of the corporation,
but have rights superior to the non-dissenting shareholders, and if it is not
liquidated, retain his right to be paid for his shares, which right the
corporation shall be obliged to satisfy when the restrictions of this paragraph
do not apply.
(3) The dissenting shareholder shall exercise such option under
subparagraph (1) or (2) by written notice filed with the corporation within
thirty days after the corporation has given him written notice that payment for
his shares cannot be made because of the restrictions of this paragraph. If
the dissenting shareholder fails to exercise such option as provided, the
corporation shall exercise the option by written notice given to him within
twenty days after the expiration of such period of thirty days.
(k) The enforcement by a shareholder of his right to receive payment for
his shares in the manner provided herein shall exclude the enforcement by such
shareholder of any other right to which he might otherwise be entitled by
virtue of share ownership, except as provided in paragraph (e), and except that
this section shall not exclude the right of such shareholder to bring or
maintain an appropriate action to obtain relief on the ground that such
corporate action will be or is unlawful or fraudulent as to him.
(l) Except as otherwise expressly provided in this section, any notice to
be given by a corporation to a shareholder under this section shall be given in
the manner provided in section 605 (Notice of meetings of shareholders).
(m) This section shall not apply to foreign corporations except as
provided in subparagraph (e)(2) of section 907 (Merger or consolidation of
domestic and foreign corporations). (Last amended by Ch. 117, L. '86, eff.
9-1-86.)
<PAGE> 140
806(b)(6) PROVISIONS AS TO CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
(a) . . .
(b) The following provisions shall apply to amendments and changes under
this article, except under section 808 (Reorganization under Act of Congress):
(1) . . .
(6) A holder of any adversely affected shares who does not vote for or
consent in writing to the taking of such action shall, subject to and by
complying with the provisions of section 623 (Procedure to enforce
shareholder's right to receive payment for shares), have the right to dissent
and to receive payment for such shares, if the certificate of amendment (A)
alters or abolishes any preferential right of such shares having preferences;
or (B) creates, alters or abolishes any provision or right in respect of the
redemption of such shares or any sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of
such shares; or (C) alters or abolishes any preemptive right of such holder to
acquire shares or other securities; or (D) excludes or limits the right of such
holder to vote on any matter, except as such right may be limited by the voting
rights given to new shares then being authorized of any existing or new class.
910 RIGHT OF SHAREHOLDER TO RECEIVE PAYMENT FOR SHARES
UPON MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION, OR SALE, LEASE, EXCHANGE
OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF ASSETS, OR SHARE EXCHANGE
(a) A shareholder of a domestic corporation shall, subject to and by
complying with section 623 (Procedure to enforce shareholder's right to receive
payment for shares), have the right to receive payment of the fair value of his
shares and the other rights and benefits provided by such section, in the
following cases:
(1) Any shareholder entitled to vote who does not assent to the taking
of an action specified in subparagraphs (A), (B) and (C).
(A) Any plan of merger or consolidation to which the corporation
is a party; except that the right to receive payment of the fair value of
his shares shall not be available:
(i) To a shareholder of the (1) [parent] corporation in a
merger authorized by section 905 (Merger of [parent and]
subsidiary (2) [corporations]), or paragraph (c) of
section 907 (Merger or consolidation of domestic and
foreign corporations); and
(ii) To a shareholder of the surviving corporation in a
merger authorized by this article, other than a merger
specified in subparagraph (i), unless such merger
effects one or more of the changes specified in
subparagraph (b)(6) of section 806 (Provisions as to
certain proceedings) in the rights of the shares held
by such shareholder.
- ---------------
Ch. 390, L. '91, eff. 7-15-91, added matter in italic (brackets ([ ]) in EDGAR
version of document] and deleted (1) "surviving" and (2) "corporation".
<PAGE> 141
(B) Any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the assets of a corporation which requires shareholder
approval under section 909 (Sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of
assets) other than a transaction wholly for cash where the shareholders'
approval thereof is conditioned upon the dissolution of the
corporation and the distribution of substantially all of its net
assets to the shareholders in accordance with their respective
interests within one year after the date of such transaction.
(C) Any share exchange authorized by section 913 in which the
corporation is participating as a subject corporation; except that the
right to receive payment of the fair value of his shares shall not be
available to a shareholder whose shares have not been acquired in the
exchange.
(2) Any shareholder of the subsidiary corporation in a merger
authorized by section 905 or paragraph (c) of section 907, or in a share
exchange authorized by paragraph (g) of section 913, who files with the
corporation a written notice of election to dissent as provided in paragraph
(c) of section 623. (Last amended by Ch. 390, L. '91, eff. 7-15-91.)
<PAGE> 142
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Emerson is a Missouri corporation. Section 351.355(1) of the Revised
Statutes of Missouri provides that a corporation may indemnify a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation in any action, suit or proceeding
other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, against expenses
(including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts actually
and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to
be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect
to any criminal action, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was
unlawful. Section 351.355(2) provides that the corporation may indemnify any
such person in any action or suit by or in the right of the corporation against
expenses (including attorneys' fees) and settlement amounts actually and
reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the
action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed
to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that
he may not be indemnified in respect of any matter in which he has been
adjudged liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duty to
the corporation, unless authorized by the court. Section 351.355(3) provides
that a corporation shall indemnify any such person against expenses (including
attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the
action, suit or proceeding if he has been successful in defense of such action,
suit or proceeding and if such action, suit or proceeding is one for which the
corporation may indemnify him under Section 351.355(1) or (2). Section
351.355(7) provides that a corporation shall have the power to give any further
indemnity to any such person, in addition to the indemnity otherwise authorized
under Section 351.355, provided such further indemnity is either (i)
authorized, directed or provided for in the articles of incorporation of the
corporation or any duly adopted amendment thereof or (ii) is authorized,
directed or provided for in any By-Law or agreement of the corporation which
has been adopted by a vote of the shareholders of the corporation, provided
that no such indemnity shall indemnify any person from or on account of such
person's conduct which was finally adjudged to have been knowingly fraudulent,
deliberately dishonest or willful misconduct.
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on February 10, 1987, the
shareholders adopted indemnification agreements with the directors of Emerson
and amendments to the By-Laws of Emerson which incorporate indemnity provisions
permitted by Section 351.355(7) described above. The agreements and amended
By-Laws provide that Emerson will indemnify its directors and officers against
all expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and settlement
amounts, paid or incurred in any action or proceeding, including any action by
or on behalf of Emerson, on account of their service as a director or officer
of Emerson, any subsidiary of Emerson or any other company or enterprise when
they are serving in such capacities at the request of Emerson, excepting only
cases where (i) the conduct of such person is adjudged to be knowingly
fraudulent, deliberately dishonest or willful misconduct, (ii) a final court
adjudication shall determine that such indemnification is not lawful, (iii)
judgment is rendered against such person for an accounting of profits made from
a purchase or sale of securities of Emerson in violation of Section 16(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or of any similar statutory law, or (iv)
any remuneration paid to such person is adjudicated to have been paid in
violation of law. Such person shall be indemnified only to the extent that the
aggregate of losses to be indemnified exceeds the amount of such losses for
<PAGE> 143
which the director or officer is insured pursuant to any directors' or
officers' liability insurance policy maintained by Emerson.
The directors and officers of Emerson are insured under a policy of
directors' and officers' liability insurance.
Item 21.(a) Exhibits.
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended April 11, 1996 and
.........., 1996 (attached as Exhibit A to the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus)**
4.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein
by reference to 1989 Form 10-K, Exhibit 3(a))
4.2 By-Laws of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to 1989
Form 10-K, Exhibit 3(b))
4.3 Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan (incorporated herein by reference
to Emerson's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed under the
Exchange Act, as amended under cover on Form 8 on November 3, 1988)
5.1 Opinion of H. M. Smith, Esq., Assistant General Counsel of Emerson as
to the legality of securities being registered*
8.1 Opinion of Hancock & Estabrook, LLP as to certain federal income tax
consequences*
23.1 Consent of H. M. Smith, Esq., Assistant General Counsel of Emerson
(included in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2 Consent of Hancock & Estabrook, LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1)
23.3 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP**
23.4 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP**
23.5 Consent of Management Planning, Inc.*
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in signature page)*
99.1 Form of Proxy for special meeting to be mailed to Lipe-Rollway
shareholders**
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2), Emerson hereby agrees to furnish supplementally
to the Commission, a copy of any omitted schedule upon the Commission's
request.
- ---------------
* Previously filed
** To be filed by amendment
<PAGE> 144
Item 21.(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
All financial statement schedules of Emerson are omitted because they are
not required, not applicable or the information given in the financial
statements or notes thereto are contained in the Annual Report of Emerson on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995.
Item 22. Undertakings.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being
made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement;
(i) To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising
after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most
recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth
in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total
dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was
registered) and any deviation from the low or high and of the
estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in
the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than
a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth
in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective
registration statement.
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the
plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration
statement or any material change to such information in the
registration statement;
provided, however, that paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) do not apply if
the registration statement is on Form S-3, Form S-8, or Form F-3, and the
information required to be included in the post-effective amendment by
those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed with or furnished
to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)
of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in
the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed
to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed
to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the
<PAGE> 145
registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that prior to
any public reoffering of securities registered hereunder through use of a
prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or
party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the
issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information
called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called
for by the other items of the applicable form.
(d) The undersigned registrant undertakes that every prospectus: (i) that
is filed pursuant to paragraph (c) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports
to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Act and is used in
connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as
a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until
such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(e) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise,
the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling
person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in
the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the questions whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(f) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests
for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant
to Item 4, 10(b), 11, or 13 of this form, within one business day of receipt of
such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or
other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents
filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through
the date of responding to the request.
(g) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a
post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the
company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and
included in the registration statement when it became effective.
<PAGE> 146
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant
has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the County of St.
Louis, State of Missouri, on June 19, 1996.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
By: /s/ Harley M. Smith
-------------------------------------
Harley M. Smith
Assistant General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on June 19, 1996.
Signature Title
- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
/s/ C.F. KNIGHT* Chairman of the Board, President and
- -------------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer and Director
C.F. Knight
/s/ W.J. GALVIN* Senior Vice President - Finance,
- -------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer and
W. J. Galvin Chief Accounting Officer
/s/ L. L. BROWNING, JR.* Director
- --------------------------------------
L. L. Browning, Jr.
/s/ A. A. BUSCH, III* Director
- --------------------------------------
A. A. Busch, III
/s/ D. C. FARRELL* Director
- --------------------------------------
D. C. Farrell
/s/ J. A. FRATES* Director
- --------------------------------------
J. A. Frates
/s/ R. B. HORTON* Director
- --------------------------------------
R. B. Horton
/s/ G. A. LODGE* Director
- --------------------------------------
G. A. Lodge
/s/ V. R. LOUCKS, JR.* Director
- --------------------------------------
V. R. Loucks, Jr.
<PAGE> 147
Signature Title
- -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
/s/ R. B. LOYND* Director
- --------------------------------------
R. B. Loynd
/s/ R. L. RIDGWAY* Director
- --------------------------------------
R. L. Ridgway
/s/ R. W. STALEY* Vice Chairman and Director
- --------------------------------------
R. W. Staley
/s/ A. E. SUTER* Senior Vice Chairman and
- -------------------------------------- Chief Operating Officer and
A. E. Suter Director
/s/ W. M. VAN CLEVE* Director
- --------------------------------------
W. M. Van Cleve
/s/ E. E. WHITACRE, JR.* Director
- --------------------------------------
E. E. Whitacre, Jr.
/s/ E. F. WILLIAMS, JR.* Director
- --------------------------------------
E. F. Williams, Jr.
*By: /s/ Harley M. Smith
---------------------------------
Harley M. Smith
Attorney-in-Fact
