<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-10605
---------
ODETICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 95-2588496
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1515 South Manchester Avenue 92802
Anaheim, California (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive office)
(714) 774-5000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all documents
and reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of AUGUST 10, 1999
Class A Common Stock - 8,003,233 shares.
Class B Common Stock - 1,060,041 shares.
1
<PAGE>
INDEX
-----
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page
-------------------------------- ----
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR 3
THE THREE MONTHS JUNE 30, 1998 AND 1999 (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 1999 4
AND JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR 6
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
1999 (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 7
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 10
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
-------------------------
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 22
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS 22
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES 22
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF 22
SECURITY HOLDERS
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION 22
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K 22
SIGNATURES 23
In this Report, "Odetics," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our"
collectively refers to Odetics, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
2
<PAGE>
PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ODETICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
June 30,
--------------------------
1998 1999
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales and contract revenues:
Net sales $17,057 $ 17,370
Contract revenues 2,722 4,705
------- --------
Total net sales and contract revenues 19,779 22,075
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 12,546 12,203
Cost of contract revenues 1,815 3,160
Selling, general and administrative expense 7,993 8,859
Research and development expense 2,604 3,879
Interest expense, net 358 617
------- --------
25,316 28,718
------- --------
Loss before taxes (5,537) (6,643)
Income taxes 0 0
------- --------
Net loss ($5,537) ($6,643)
======= ========
Basic and diluted loss per share ($0.76) ($0.74)
======= ========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding 7,265 9,030
======= ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-3-
<PAGE>
ODETICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, June 30,
1999 1999
--------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash $ 787 $ 1,734
Trade accounts receivable, net 18,889 18,249
Costs and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts 2,423 2,616
Inventories:
Finished goods 1,101 1,203
Work in process 749 685
Materials and supplies 14,135 12,855
-------- --------
Total inventories 15,985 14,743
Prepaid expenses 1,295 1,235
Income taxes receivable 531 302
Deferred income taxes 1,558 1,558
-------- --------
Total Current Assets 41,468 40,437
Property, plant and equipment
Land 2,060 2,060
Buildings and improvements 18,674 18,714
Equipment, furniture and fixtures 31,303 31,757
-------- --------
52,037 52,531
Less accumulated depreciation (29,561) (30,529)
-------- --------
Net property, plant and equipment 22,476 22,002
Capitalized software costs, net 7,667 7,484
Other Assets 10,926 10,664
-------- --------
Total Assets $ 82,537 $ 80,587
======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-4-
<PAGE>
ODETICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (cont'd)
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, June 30,
1999 1999
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY --------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable $ 10,454 $ 9,992
Accrued payroll and related 5,441 4,883
Accrued expenses 1,933 2,348
Contract loss accrual 3,892 3,774
Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts 1,276 1,117
Current portion of long-term debt 2,074 2,074
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 25,070 24,188
Revolving line of credit 10,997 16,616
Long-term debt - Less current portion 8,965 8,462
Deferred income taxes 1,182 1,292
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, authorized 2,000,000 shares;
none issued -- --
Common stock, authorized 10,000,000
shares of class A and 2,600,000 shares
of class B; 7,997,778 shares of
class A and 1,060,041 shares of
class B issued and outstanding at
June 30, 1999 - $.10 par value 901 906
Paid-in capital 59,579 59,813
Treasury stock (240) (240)
Note receivable from associates (96) (96)
Retained earnings (23,913) (30,556)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 92 202
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity 36,323 30,029
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 82,537 $ 80,587
======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-5-
<PAGE>
ODETICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
June 30,
----------------------
1998 1999
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Operating activities
Net income (loss) ($5,537) ($6,643)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,011 1,434
Provision for losses on accounts receivable 66 0
Provision for deferred income taxes 10 339
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable 2,057 640
(Increase) Decrease in net costs and estimated
earnings in excess of billings 733 (352)
(Increase) Decrease in inventories 1,074 1,242
(Increase) Decrease in prepaids and other assets 2,286 139
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and
accrued expenses (3,978) (613)
-------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities (2,278) (3,814)
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment (652) (494)
Software development costs (1,015) (102)
Cash received on note receivable 1,056 0
-------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (611) (596)
Financing activities
Proceeds from revolving line of credit and
long-term borrowings 15,110 11,102
Principal payments on line of credit, long-term
debt and capital lease obligations (10,225) (5,984)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock (1) 239
-------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities 4,884 5,357
-------- --------
Decrease in cash 1,995 947
Cash at beginning of year 1,131 787
-------- --------
Cash at June 30 $ 3,126 $ 1,734
======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-6-
<PAGE>
ODETICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1- Basis of Presentation
- ------
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly the consolidated
financial position of Odetics, Inc as of June 30, 1999 and the
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three month
periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1999. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for the
three month period ended June 30, 1999 are not necessarily indicative
of those to be expected for the entire year. The accompanying
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1999 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Note 2- Income Taxes
- ------
Income tax expense (benefit) for the three month period ended June 30,
1998 and 1999 has been provided at the estimated annualized effective
tax rates based on the estimated income tax liability or assets and
change in deferred taxes for their respective fiscal years. Deferred
taxes result primarily from temporary differences in the reporting of
income for financial statement and income tax purposes. These
differences relate principally to the use of accelerated cost recovery
depreciation methods for tax purposes, capitalization of interest and
taxes for tax purposes, capitalization of computer software costs for
financial statement purposes, deferred compensation, other payroll
accruals, reserves for inventory and accounts receivable for financial
statement purposes and general business tax credit and alternative
minimum tax credit carryforwards for tax purposes. The Company has not
provided income tax benefit for the losses incurred in fiscal 1998 and
1999 due to the uncertainty as to the ultimate realization of the
benefit.
Note 3- Long-Term Debt
- ------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands)
March 31, June 30,
1999 1999
--------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Mortgage note 8,173 7,894
Contracts payable 2,866 2,642
--------- --------
11,039 10,536
Less current portion 2,074 2,074
--------- --------
$8,965 $ 8,462
========= ========
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE>
NOTE 4- Legal Proceedings
- ------
We brought an action against Storage Technology Corporation
("StorageTek") in the Eastern District Court of Virginia alleging that
StorageTek had infringed our patent covering robotics tape cassette
handling systems (United States Patent No. 4,779,151). StorageTek
counterclaimed alleging that we infringed several of StorageTek's
patents. Prior to trial, the court dismissed two of the infringement
claims against us and the third claim was resolved between the parties.
In January 1996, the jury determined that the patent claims were not
infringed under the doctrine of equivalents based upon a claim
construction defined by the court prior to the trial. The jury also
concluded that our patent was not invalid. In June 1997, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the lower
court's claim construction and findings of noninfringement of our
patent. The appellate court remanded the case for consideration of
infringement under a proper claim construction. In August 1997, the
appellate court denied a petition for rehearing requested by
StorageTek. The case has been returned to the Federal District Court
for retrial, and in March 1998, the jury awarded us damages in the
amount of $70.6 million. In June 1998, the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia granted an injunction against StorageTek
enjoining StorageTek from making, selling or using any infringing
devices, including the ACS4400, PowderHorn, Wolfcreek and Genesis
automated tape library systems that include a pass through port. In
June 1998, the U.S. District Court issued an order requesting the
parties to brief the issues of whether StorageTek's motion for judgment
as a matter of law should have been granted, and whether the injunction
previously ordered by the court against StorageTek should be stayed
pending appeal. After filing hearings, the trial court vacated its own
injunction and granted StorageTek's motion for judgment as a matter of
law to vacate the jury trial result and to find StorageTek not
infringing. We have appealed these and other court rulings. The
defendants also cross-appealed certain other court rulings. In July
1999 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the
trial court's judgement of non-infringement and reinstated the verdict
of $70.6 million. StorageTek has filed a petition for rehearing by
either the three judge panel that decided the case or en banc, i.e. by
all of the active judges on the court. A decision from the U.S. Court
of Appeals is pending this petition.
NOTE 5- Comprehensive Income
- ------
The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three months
ended June 30, 1998 and 1999 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1999
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) $(5,537) $(6,643)
Foreign currency
translation adjustment 16 110
-------- --------
Comprehensive income (loss) $(5,521) $(6,533)
======== ========
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE>
NOTE 6- Business Segment Information
- ------
The Company operates in three reportable segments: intelligent
transportation systems, video products, which includes products for
the television broadcast and video security markets, and
telecommunications. Selected financial information for the Company's
reportable segments for the quarters ended June 30, 1998 and 1999
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Intelligent Video Telecom Total
Transportation Products Products -------
-------------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Three months ended 6/30/98
Revenue from external customers 3,515 11,973 3,313 18,801
Intersegment Revenues 0 545 9 554
Segment income (loss) (1,051) (1,208) (949) (3,208)
(in thousands)
Three months ended 6/30/99
Revenue from external customers 5,097 11,444 3,644 20,185
Intersegment Revenues 0 1,167 16 1,183
Segment income (loss) (688) (2,177) (1,015) (3,880)
</TABLE>
The following reconciles segment income to consolidated income before
income taxes:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
3 months ended 3 months ended
(in thousands) June 30, 1998 June 30, 1999
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue
Total revenues for reportable segments 19,355 21,368
Non-reportable segment revenues 978 1,890
Other Revenues 0 0
Elimination of Intersegment sales (554) (1,183)
---------- ----------
Total consolidated revenues 19,779 22,075
Total loss for reportable segments (3,208) (3,880)
Other profit or loss (654) (842)
Unallocated amounts:
Corporate and other expenses (1,317) (1,307)
Special charge 0 0
Interest expense (358) (614)
---------- ----------
Loss before income taxes (5,537) (6,643)
</TABLE>
9
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in this Report
and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Odetics. When used in this Report, the
words "expect(s)," "feel(s)," "believe(s)," "intends," "plans," "will," "may,"
"anticipate(s)" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things,
statements concerning projected revenues, funding and cash requirements, supply
issues, market acceptance of new products, the Odetics incubator strategy, the
final outcome of the StorageTek litigation, and estimated Y2K costs and involve
a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, those set
forth at the end of this Item 2 under the caption "Risk Factors." Odetics'
actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statements
discussed herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Odetics
undertakes no obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
Results of Operations
General. Odetics defines its business segments as Video Products, Telecom
Products, and ITS. The Video Products segment includes our Broadcast division
and the Gyyr Incorporated subsidiary. The Telecom Products segment includes our
Communications division which manufactures timing and synchronization products,
and the business of Mariner Networks, a wholly owned subsidiary. The ITS segment
represents Odetics' 93% owned subsidiary Odetics ITS, Inc.
Net Sales and Contract Revenues. Net sales and contract revenues consist
of (i) sales of products and services to commercial and municipal customers
("net sales") and (ii) revenues derived from contracts with state, county and
municipal agencies for intelligent transportation systems projects ("contract
revenues"). Contract revenues also include revenue from contracts with agencies
of the United States Government and foreign entities for space recorders used
for geographical information systems. Total net sales and contract revenues
increased 11.6% to $22.1 million for the three month period ended June 30, 1999,
compared to $19.7 million in the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year.
Contract revenues increased 72.9% to $4.7 million for the three month period
ended June 30, 1999 compared to $2.7 million in the corresponding period of the
prior fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, we completed the
acquisition of Meyer Mohaddes Associates Inc. and the assets of Viggen
Corporation. The increase in contract revenues in the three month period ended
June 30, 1999 reflects primarily the revenue contribution from these
acquisitions.
Net sales increased 1.8% to $17.4 million for the three month period ended
June 30, 1999, compared to $17.1 million in the corresponding period of the
prior fiscal year. Net sales in the three month period ended June 30, 1999
compared to the corresponding period of the prior year reflects increased sales
in the Broadcast division, our ITS business, and, to a lesser extent our
Communications division, offset by a 16.5% decrease in sales of Gyyr products.
Increased net sales of ITS in the three month period ended June 30, 1999
reflects increased units sales of its Vantage product, a video based traffic
intersection control product. Increased sales in the Broadcast division reflect
increased unit sales of its broadcast automation systems. Gyyr's net sales
decreased primarily as a result of reduced unit sales of certain models of its
time lapse video tape decks. The reduction in Gyyr's net sales principally
reflects reduced purchases by certain of its OEM customers that sell to the
banking industry.
10
<PAGE>
Gross Profit. Gross profit as a percent of net sales increased to 29.7%
for the three month period ended June 30, 1999, compared to 26.4% the
corresponding period in the prior fiscal year. The increase in gross profit
performance in the three months ended June 30, 1999 reflects improved gross
profits experienced by the Broadcast division on a 68.6% increase in sales, and
improved gross profits on Vantage product sales by the ITS business as a result
of increased unit sales volume.
Gross profit as a percent of contract revenues decreased to 32.8% for the
three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to 33.3% in the comparable period of
the prior fiscal year. The decline in gross profits on contract revenues for the
three month period ended June 30, 1999 primarily reflects an unfavorable mix of
certain ITS contracts at lower gross profits in the first quarter of the current
fiscal year.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and
administrative expense increased 10.8% to $8.9 million (or 40.1% of total net
sales and contract revenues) in the three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to
$8.0 million (40.4% of total net sales and contract revenues) in the
corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The increase in selling, general
and administrative expense in the three month period ended June 30, 1999
compared to the previous fiscal year period reflects increased sales and
marketing expenses in the Broadcast, Gyyr, and ITS operations and increased
charges for amortization of goodwill related to acquisitions. Net of goodwill
amortization, general and administrative expenses decreased 7.0% in the quarter
ended June 30, 1999 compared to the corresponding period of the prior fiscal
year. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in ITS primarily reflects
increased costs to support the roll-out of the Vantage product line, and
acquired sales and marketing costs related to the acquisitions of Meyer Mohaddes
Associates and the assets of Viggen Corporation noted above. The principal
expense categories that increased include sales and marketing labor costs,
advertising and promotion to support new products and markets, and costs related
to international expansion.
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense
increased 49.0% to $3.9 million (or 17.6% of total net sales and contract
revenues) in the three month period ended June 30, 1999 compared to $2.6 million
(or 13.2% of total net sales and contract revenues) in the corresponding period
of the prior fiscal year. The increase in research and development expense in
the three month period ended June 30, 1999 compared to the previous fiscal year
period principally reflects increased product development expenses in Broadcast,
Mariner Networks, and ITS. For competitive reasons, Odetics closely guards the
confidentiality of its specific development projects. The increase in product
development expense relates primarily to development labor and related benefits,
prototype material cost and consulting fees. The acquisitions of Meyer Mohaddes
Associates and the assets of Viggen Corporation noted above, did not contribute
to the increases in current year research and development expenses.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest Expense, Net reflects interest income and
interest expense as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ended June 30
--------------
1998 1999
------ ------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Interest Expense $553 $617
Interest Income 195 0
---- ----
Interest Expense, Net $358 $617
==== ====
</TABLE>
Interest expense primarily reflects interest on Odetics' line of credit
borrowings and mortgage interest. Interest income in the three months ended
June 30, 1998 was derived from a note receivable due to Odetics from ATL
Products Inc., its previously owned subsidiary. The note was repaid in full in
July 1998. The increase in interest expense for the three month period ended
June 30, 1999 compared to the prior fiscal year reflects an increase in the
Odetics' average outstanding borrowings on its line of credit facility.
11
<PAGE>
Income Taxes. No income tax benefit was provided on the net loss of
Odetics for the three month period ended June 30, 1999, or in the corresponding
period of the prior fiscal year because management has determined that Odetics
cannot meet the criteria for recognition of the resulting deferred tax asset.
12
<PAGE>
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Odetics incurred losses before interest, taxes, and depreciation and
amortization of $4.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 1999. These
losses, net of inventory and accounts receivable reductions, resulted in the use
of $3.8 million of cash in operations in the three months ended June 30, 1999.
Odetics spent $.5 million to fund capital expenditures during the quarter.
Odetics financed its cash requirements principally with advances on its line of
credit facility.
Odetics has a line of credit relationship with Transamerica Business
Credit for a $17.0 million line of credit providing for borrowings at prime plus
2.0% (8.75% at June 30, 1999). At June 30, 1999, Odetics had outstanding
borrowings of $16.6 million on the line of credit. Odetics' borrowings under
this line of credit are secured by substantially all of its assets.
On July 7, 1999 Odetics announced that the United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit ordered that a jury's verdict awarding it $70.6 million
in damages in the case of Odetics, Inc. vs. Storage Technology Corporation be
reinstated. Additional pre-judgement interest previously set by the district
court at the rate of 7.5%, compounded quarterly, will be added. Odetics has not
accrued any benefit related to the favorable outcome of the litigation in the
three month period ended June 30, 1999. Odetics anticipates that during the
three month period ended September 30, 1999 that it will accrue the benefit
related to the litigation.
In July 1999, Odetics sold an option to Manchester Capital LLC for an
aggregate purchase price of $5 million to purchase certain real property of
Odetics consisting of approximately 14 acres located at 1515 South Manchester
Avenue, Anaheim, California. The option exercise price is equal to the lessor
of (a) the appraised fair market value of this real property as determined at
November 1, 1999, or (b) at the option of Manchester Capital, the appraised fair
market value of this real estate at November 1, 2000 or November 1, 2002.
Odetics used the proceeds of the option sale for general working capital
purposes.
The Odetics strategy of incubating companies for eventual spin-off or sale
requires significant investments of cash. Odetics is exploring several
alternatives for increasing its liquidity including the potential monetization
of certain real property, the re-negotiation of its credit facility with
Transamerica Business Credit, and the sale of additional equity and debt
instruments. Odetics anticipates that it will be successful in its efforts to
increase its liquidity, and that the related proceeds plus the proceeds from the
successful outcome of the litigation with Storage Technology will enable it to
execute its current operating plans and meet its obligations on a timely basis
for at least the next twelve months.
Year 2000 Compliance
We are currently addressing problems associated with our computer systems
as the year 2000 approaches. Many existing computer systems and applications,
and other control devices use only two digits to identify a year in the date
field, without considering the impact of the upcoming change in the century.
Others do not correctly process "leap year" dates. As a result, such systems
and applications could fail or create erroneous results unless corrected so that
they can correctly process data related to the year 2000 and beyond. These
problems are expected to increase in frequency and severity as the year 2000
approaches, and are commonly referred to as the year 2000 problem.
We have evaluated each of our products and believe that each is
substantially year 2000 compliant. We have adopted the British Standards
Institute standard for its statements of compliance regarding the year 2000. We
believe that it is not possible to determine whether all of our customers'
products into which our products are incorporated will be year 2000 compliant
because we have little or no control over the design, production and testing of
our customers' products.
13
<PAGE>
The year 2000 problem could affect the systems, transaction processing
computer applications and devices that we use to operate and monitor all major
aspects of our business, including financial systems (such as general ledger,
accounts payable, and payroll), customer services, infrastructure, master
production scheduling, materials requirement planning, networks and
telecommunications systems. We believe that we have identified substantially
all of the major systems, software applications and related equipment used in
connection with our internal operations that must be modified or upgraded in
order to minimize the possibility of a material disruption to our business. We
are currently in the process of modifying and upgrading all affected systems and
expect to complete this process during the calendar year 1999. Because most of
our software applications are recent versions of vendor supported, commercially
available products, we have not incurred, and do not expect in the future to
incur, significant costs to upgrade these applications as year 2000 compliant
versions are released by the respective vendors. Systems such as telephone,
networking, test equipment, and security systems at our facilities may also be
affected by the year 2000 problem. We are currently assessing the potential
effect of and costs of remediating the year 2000 problem on our facility
systems. We estimate that our total cost of completing any required
modifications, upgrades or replacements of these systems will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or result of
operations.
We presently estimate that the total cost of addressing our year 2000
issues will be approximately $500,000. We based this estimate using numerous
assumptions, including the assumption that we have already identified our most
significant year 2000 issues and that the plans of our third party suppliers
will be fulfilled in a timely manner without cost to us. We cannot be sure that
these assumptions are accurate, and actual results could differ materially from
those we anticipate.
We are currently developing contingency plans to address the year 2000
issues that may pose a significant risk to our on-going operations. These plans
could include accelerated replacement of affected equipment of software,
temporary use of back-up equipment of software or the implementation of manual
procedures to compensate for system deficiencies. We cannot be certain that
any contingency plans implemented by us would be adequate to meet our needs
without materially impacting our operations, that any such plan would be
successful or that our results of operations would not be materially and
adversely affected by the delays and inefficiencies inherent in conducting
operations in an alternative manner.
14
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to a number of risks, some of which are discussed
below. Other risks are presented elsewhere in this report. You should consider
the following risks carefully in addition to the other information contained in
this report before purchasing the shares of our common stock. If any of the
following risks actually occur, they could seriously harm our business,
financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the trading price of
our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS FLUCTUATE AS A RESULT OF MANY FACTORS. Our
quarterly operating results have fluctuated and are likely to continue to
fluctuate due to a number of factors, many of which are not within our control.
Because of the factors listed below and other risks discussed in this report,
our future operating results could be below the expectations of securities
analysts and/or investors. If that happens, the trading price of our common
stock could be adversely affected.
Factors that could affect our revenues include the following:
. our significant investment in research and development for our
subsidiaries and divisions;
. our ability to develop, introduce, market and gain market acceptance
of new products applications and product enhancements in a timely
manner;
. the introduction of new products by competitors and technological
change in our target markers;
. the availability of components used in the manufacture of our
products;
. our ability to control costs;
. changes in our pricing policies and the pricing policies by our
suppliers and competitors, as well as increased price competition in
general;
. the long lead times associated with government contracts or required
by vehicle manufacturers;
. our success in expanding and implementing our sales and marketing
programs;
. our relatively small level of backlog at any given time;
. the mix of sales among our business units; and
. the Asian economic crisis and instability.
In addition, our sales in any quarter typically consist of a relatively
small number of large customer orders. As a result, the timing of a small
number of orders can impact our quarter to quarter results. The loss of or a
substantial reduction in orders from any significant customer could seriously
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
WE HAVE EXPERIENCED SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES AND EXPECT FUTURE LOSSES. We
incurred net losses of $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999 and
net losses of $20.1 million for the year ended March 31, 1999. We may not be
able to achieve profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.
Recent revenue growth also may not be sustainable and may not be indicative of
future operating results. Most of our expenses are fixed in advance, and we
generally are unable to reduce our expenses significantly in the short term to
compensate for any unexpected delay or decrease in anticipated revenues. In
addition, in order to implement our incubator strategy successfully, we expect
to continue to make significant investments in each of our business units. As a
result, we may continue to experience losses which could cause the market price
of our common stock to decline.
OUR INCUBATOR STRATEGY IS EXPENSIVE AND MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL. We have
initiated a business strategy called our incubator strategy which is expensive
and highly risky. The goal of this strategy is to nurture and develop companies
that can be spun-off to our stockholders. This strategy has in the past
required us to make significant investments in our business units, both for
research and development, and
15
<PAGE>
also to develop a separate infrastructure for each of our unit, sufficient to
allow the unit to function as an independent public company. We expect to
continue to invest heavily in the development of our business units with the
goal of conducting additional public offerings. We may not recognize the
benefits of this investment for a significant period of time, if at all. Our
ability to complete an initial public offering of any of our business units and
spin-off our interest to our stockholders will depend upon many factors,
including:
. the overall performance and results of operations of the particular
business unit;
. the potential market for our business unit;
. our ability to assemble and retain a broad, qualified management team
for the business unit;
. our financial position and cash requirements;
. the business unit's customer base and product line;
. the current tax treatment of spin-off transactions and our ability to
obtain favorable determination letters from the Internal Revenue
Service; and
. general economic and market conditions.
We may not be able to complete a successful initial public offering or
spin-off of any of our business units in the near future, or at all. Even if we
do complete additional public offerings, we may decide not to spin-off a
particular business unit, or to delay the spin-off until a later date.
WE MUST KEEP PACE WITH RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE TO REMAIN COMPETITIVE.
Our target markets are in general characterized by the following factors:
. rapid technological advances;
. downward price pressure in the marketplace as technologies mature;
. changes in customer requirements;
. frequent new product introductions and enhancements; and
. evolving industry standards and changes in the regulatory environment.
We believe that we must continue to make substantial investments to support
ongoing research and development in order to remain competitive. In particular,
we will need to modify certain of our products to accommodate the anticipated
deployment of digital television and the corresponding phase-out of analog
transmissions. We will also have to continue to develop and introduce new
products that incorporate the latest technological advancements in hardware,
storage media, operating system software and applications software in response
to evolving customer requirements. Our recent shift towards providing more
software solutions may create additional challenges for us, particularly in our
Broadcast division. Our business and results of operations could be adversely
affected if we do not anticipate or respond adequately to technological
developments or changing customer requirements.
OUR FUTURE SUCCESS DEPENDS ON THE SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT AND MARKET
ACCEPTANCE OF NEW PRODUCTS.
We believe our revenue growth and future operating
results will depend on our ability to complete development of new products and
enhancements, achieve broad market acceptance of these products and
enhancements, and reduce our product costs. We may not be able to introduce
any new products or any enhancements to our existing products on a timely basis,
or at all. In addition, the introduction of any new products could adversely
affect the sales of our certain of our existing products.
Our future success will also depend in part on the success of several
recently introduced products including:
. Roswell, our automated facility management system for broadcast
television stations;
. Bowser, our visual asset manager;
. Vortex, our high performance dome product;
16
<PAGE>
. Digi Scan Pro, our advanced digital multiplexer;
. Vantage One, our single camera traffic detection system;
. Auto Vue, our lane departure warning system; and
. Dexter, our networking access device.
Market acceptance of our new products depends upon many factors, including
our ability to resolve technical challenges in a timely and cost- effective
manner, the perceived advantages of our new products over traditional products
and the marketing capabilities of our independent distributors and strategic
partners. Our business and results of operations could be seriously harmed by
any significant delays in our new product development. We have experienced
delays in the past in the introduction of new products, particularly with our
Roswell system. Certain of our new products could contain undetected design
faults and software errors or "bugs" when first released by us, despite our
testing. We may not discover these faults or errors until after a product has
been installed and used by our customers. Any faults or errors in our existing
products or in our new products may cause delays in product introduction and
shipments, require design modifications or harm customer relationships, any of
which could adversely affect our business and competitive position.
We currently anticipate that we will outsource the manufacture of Auto Vue
product line to a single manufacturer. This manufacturer may not be able to
produce sufficient quantities of this product in a timely manner or at a
reasonable cost, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to
launch or gain market acceptance of Auto Vue.
WE MAY NEED ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IN THE FUTURE AND MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SECURE
ADEQUATE FUNDS ON TERMS ACCEPTABLE TO US. We recently raised approximately
$10.0 million in two private placements, approximately $8.0 million of which was
raised in December 1998. Approximately $2.0 million was raised from the sale of
Class A common stock to certain of our officers and directors in March 1999,
following stockholder approval of this offering. We may need to raise additional
capital in the near future, either through additional bank borrowings or other
debt or equity financings. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
. market acceptance of our products;
. increased research and development funding, and required investments in
our business units;
. increased sales and marketing expenses;
. potential acquisitions of businesses and product lines; and
. additional working capital needs.
If our capital requirements are materially different from those currently
planned, we may need additional capital sooner than anticipated. If additional
funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage
ownership of our stockholders will be reduced and such securities may have
rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock. Additional
financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all. If adequate funds
are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to
develop or enhance our products, expand our sales and marketing programs, take
advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.
WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT INTERNATIONAL SALES AND ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED
WITH OPERATING IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETS. International product sales
represented approximately 27% of our total net sales and contract revenues for
fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 and approximately 34% for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 1998. We believe that international sales will continue to represent a
significant portion of our revenues, and that continued growth and profitability
may require further expansion of our international operations. Accordingly, we
may be subject to many inherent risks related to international business
operations, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations. These risks include:
17
<PAGE>
. unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade
barriers;
. longer accounts receivable payment cycles;
. seasonal fluctuations resulting from lower sales that typically occur
during the summer months in Europe and other parts of the world;
. difficulties in managing and staffing international operations;
. potentially adverse tax consequences;
. the burdens of compliance with a wide variety of foreign laws;
. reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
. political and economic instability.
Our international sales are currently denominated primarily in U.S.
dollars. As a result, an increase in the relative value of the dollar could make
our products more expensive and potentially less price competitive in
international markets. We do not engage in any transactions as a hedge against
risks of loss due to foreign currency fluctuations or restrictions.
Any of these factors may adversely effect our future international sales
and, consequently, on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our operating results have been adversely affected by the Asian economic
crisis. Our telecommunications products are sold principally to LGIC of Korea.
As a result of economic instability in Asia, particularly in Korea, our sales in
this region declined over 70% in the past fiscal year and may continue to
decline in the future. It is possible that these sales could be further
impacted by the currency devaluations and related economic problems in this
region.
WE NEED TO MANAGE GROWTH AND THE INTEGRATION OF OUR ACQUISITIONS. Over the
past two years, we have significantly expanded our operations and made several
substantial acquisitions of diverse businesses, including Intelligent Controls,
Inc., International Media Integration Services, Ltd., Meyer Mohaddes Associates,
Inc., Viggen Corporation and certain assets of the Transportation Systems
business of Rockwell International. A key element of our business strategy
involves expansion through the acquisition of complementary businesses, products
and technologies. Our failure to manage growth and integrate our acquisitions
successfully could be costly and could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Acquisitions may require significant capital infusions and, in general,
acquisitions also involve a number of special risks, including:
. potential disruption of our ongoing business and the diversion of our
. resources and management's attention;
. the failure to retain or integrate key acquired personnel;
. the challenge of assimilating diverse business cultures;
. increased costs to improve managerial, operational, financial and
. administrative systems and to eliminate duplicative services;
. the incurrence of unforeseen obligations or liabilities;
. potential impairment of relationships with employees or customers as a
. result of changes in management; and
. increased interest expense and amortization of acquired intangible
assets.
To accommodate our recent growth and successfully integrate our
acquisitions, we anticipate that we will be required to implement a variety of
new and upgraded operational and financial systems,
18
<PAGE>
procedures and controls, including the improvement of our accounting and other
internal management systems. We may not be able to successfully integrate such
systems, procedures and controls.
WE DEPEND ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS AND SUBCONTRACTS AND FACE ADDITIONAL
RISKS RELATED TO FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS. Substantially all of the sales by our
subsidiary, Odetics ITS, Inc., and a portion of our sales by our Communications
division were derived from contracts with governmental agencies, either as a
general contractor, subcontractor or supplier. Government contracts represented
approximately 16% of our net sales and contract revenues for the year ended
March 31, 1999 and approximately 21% for the three months ended June 30, 1999.
We expect revenue from government contracts will continue to increase in the
near future. Government business is, in general, subject to special risks and
challenges, including:
. long purchase cycles;
. competitive bidding and qualification requirements;
. performance bond requirements;
. delays in funding, budgetary constraints and cut-backs;
. milestone requirements, and liquidated damage provisions for failure to
meet contract milestones.
In addition, a large number of our government contracts are fixed price
contracts. As a result, we may not be able to recover for any cost overruns.
These fixed price contracts require us to estimate the total project cost based
on preliminary projections of the project's requirements. The financial
viability of any given project depends in large part on our ability to estimate
these costs accurately and complete the project on a timely basis. In the event
our costs on these projects exceed the fixed contractual amount, we will be
required to bear the excess costs. These additional costs adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, certain of our
government contracts are subject to termination or renegotiation at the
convenience of the government, which could result in a large decline in our net
sales in any given quarter. Our inability to address any of the foregoing
concerns or the loss or renegotiation of any material government contract could
seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
THE MARKETS IN WHICH WE OPERATE ARE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE AND HAVE MANY MORE
ESTABLISHED COMPETITORS. We compete with numerous other companies in our target
markets and we expect such competition to increase due to technological
advancements, industry consolidations and reduced barriers to entry. Increased
competition is likely to result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and
loss of market share, any of which could seriously harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Many of our competitors have far greater
name recognition and greater financial, technological, marketing and customer
service resources than we do. This may allow them to respond more quickly to
new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. It may also
allow them to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and
support of their products than we can. Recent consolidations of end users,
distributors and manufacturers in our target markets have exacerbated this
problem. As a result of the foregoing factors, we may not be able to compete
effectively in our target markets and competitive pressures could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
WE CANNOT BE CERTAIN OF OUR ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL AND
WE DO NOT HAVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH ANY KEY PERSONNEL. Our inability to
attract and retain additional key employees or the loss of one or more of our
current key employees could adversely affect upon our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Due to the specialized nature of our
business, we are highly dependent on the continued service of our executive
officers and other key management, engineering and technical personnel,
particularly Joel Slutzky, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board, and Gregory A. Miner, our Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. We do not have any employment contracts with any of our officers or key
employees. The loss of any of these persons would seriously harm our development
and marketing efforts, and would adversely affect our business. Our success will
also depend in large part upon our ability to continue to attract, retain and
motivate qualified engineering and other highly skilled technical personnel.
Competition for employees, particularly development engineers, is intense. We
may not be able to continue to attract and retain sufficient numbers
19
<PAGE>
of such highly skilled employees.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT OR ENFORCE OUR INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS. If we are not able to adequately protect or enforce the
proprietary aspects of our technology, competitors could be able to access our
proprietary technology and our business, financial condition and results of
operations will likely be seriously harmed. We currently attempt to protect our
technology through a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade
secret laws, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements and similar
means. Despite our efforts, other parties may attempt to disclose, obtain or
use our technologies or solutions. Our competitors may also be able to
independently develop products that are substantially equivalent or superior to
our products or design around our patents. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the
United States. As a result, we may not be able to protect our proprietary rights
adequately in the United States or abroad.
We have engaged in litigation in the past and litigation may be necessary
in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the
validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation may also be
necessary to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity by others. An
adverse outcome in litigation or any similar proceedings could subject us to
significant liabilities to third parties, require us to license disputed rights
from others or require us to cease marketing or using certain products or
technologies. We may not be able to obtain any licenses on terms acceptable to
us, or at all. Any of these results could adversely affect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the cost of
addressing any intellectual property litigation claim, both in legal fees and
expenses, and the diversion of management resources, regardless of whether the
claim is valid, could be significant and could seriously harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK IS VOLATILE. The trading price of our
common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations in the past, decreasing from
$20.375 in October 1997 to $4.25 in October 1998. We may not be able to
increase or sustain the current market price of our common stock in the future.
The market price of our common stock could continue to fluctuate in the future
in response to various factors, including, but not limited to:
. quarterly variations in operating results;
. shortages announced by suppliers
. announcements of technological innovations or new products;
. acquisitions or businesses, products or technologies;
. changes in pending litigation;
. our ability to spin-off any business units;
. applications or product enhancements by us or by our competitors; and
. changes in financial estimates by securities analysts.
The stock market in general has recently experienced volatility which has
particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of many high
technology companies. This volatility has often been unrelated to the operating
performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely
affect the market price of our common stock.
WE ARE CONTROLLED BY CERTAIN OF OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS. As of June 30,
1999, our officers and directors beneficially owned approximately 29% of the
total combined voting power of the outstanding shares of our Class A common
stock and Class B common stock. As a result of their stock ownership, our
management will be able to significantly influence the election of our directors
and the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, such as
mergers and acquisitions, regardless of how our other stockholders may vote.
This concentration of voting control may have a significant effect in delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in our management or change in control and may
adversely affect the voting or other rights of other holders of common stock.
20
<PAGE>
OUR STOCK STRUCTURE AND CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS MAY EFFECT THE
PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK. Certain provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and our stockholder rights plan could make it difficult for a
third party to acquire us, even though an acquisition might be beneficial to our
stockholders. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be
willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Our Class A common
stock entitles the holder to one-tenth of one vote per share and our Class B
common stock entitles the holder to one vote per share. In addition, holders of
the Class B common stock are presently entitled to elect six of our nine
directors. The disparity in the voting rights between our common stock, as well
as our insiders' significant ownership of the Class B common stock, could
discourage a proxy contest or make it more difficult for a third party to effect
a change in our management and control. In addition, our board of directors is
authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 2,000,000 shares of
preferred stock with voting, conversion and other rights and preferences
superior to those of our common stock, as well as additional shares of Class B
common stock. Our future issuance of preferred stock or Class B common stock
could be used to discourage an unsolicited acquisition proposal.
In March 1998, we adopted a stockholder rights plan and declared a dividend
of preferred stock purchase rights to our stockholders. In the event a third
party acquires more than 15% of the outstanding voting control of Odetics or 15%
of our outstanding common stock, the holders of these rights will be able to
purchase the junior participating preferred stock at a substantial discount off
of the then current market price. The exercise of these rights and purchase of a
significant amount of stock at below market prices could cause substantial
dilution to a particular acquiror and discourage the acquiror from pursuing
Odetics. The mere existence of the stockholder rights plan often delays or makes
a merger, tender offer or proxy contest more difficult.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE. Many currently installed computer systems and
software products are coded to accept only two digit entries in the date code
field. These systems and software products will need to accept four digit
entries to distinguish 21st century dates from 20th century dates. As a result,
computer systems and/or software used by many companies may need to be upgraded
to comply with such Year 2000 requirements or risk system failure or
miscalculations causing disruptions of normal business activities. Although our
core products are designed to be Year 2000 compliant, it is difficult to ensure
that our products contain all necessary date code changes. We are in the
process of updating our existing information systems to become Year 2000
compliant. We have established an internal task force to evaluate our current
status and state of readiness for the Year 2000. We believe the most significant
impact of the Year 2000 issues will be the readiness of our suppliers,
distributors, customers and lenders with whom we must interact. This evaluation
is still at an early stage. We do not yet have any contingency plans to address
our inability to remedy these issues and we may not have fully identified the
Year 2000 impact. As such, we may not be able to update our systems and products
or resolve the other Year 2000 issues without disrupting our business or without
incurring significant expense. Our failure to address these issues on a timely
basis or at all could result in lost revenues, increased operating costs, the
loss of customers and other business interruptions, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
WE DO NOT PAY CASH DIVIDENDS. We have never paid cash dividends on our
common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on either class of
our common stock in the foreseeable future.
WE MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL RISKS. The risks and uncertainties
described above are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may
also adversely affect our business operations.
21
<PAGE>
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We brought an action against Storage Technology Corporation ("StorageTek")
in the Eastern District Court of Virginia alleging that StorageTek had infringed
our patent covering robotics tape cassette handling systems (United States
Patent No. 4,779,151). StorageTek counterclaimed alleging that we infringed
several of StorageTek's patents. Prior to trial, the court dismissed two of the
infringement claims against us and the third claim was resolved between the
parties. In January 1996, the jury determined that the patent claims were not
infringed under the doctrine of equivalents based upon a claim construction
defined by the court prior to the trial. The jury also concluded that our
patent was not invalid. In June 1997, the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit vacated the lower court's claim construction and findings of
noninfringement of our patent. The appellate court remanded the case for
consideration of infringement under a proper claim construction. In August
1997, the appellate court denied a petition for rehearing requested by
StorageTek. The case has been returned to the Federal District Court for
retrial, and in March 1998, the jury awarded us damages in the amount of $70.6
million. In June 1998, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia granted an injunction against StorageTek enjoining StorageTek from
making, selling or using any infringing devices, including the ACS4400,
PowderHorn, Wolfcreek and Genesis automated tape library systems that include a
pass through port. In June 1998, the U.S. District Court issued an order
requesting the parties to brief the issues of whether StorageTek's motion for
judgment as a matter of law should have been granted, and whether the injunction
previously ordered by the court against StorageTek should be stayed pending
appeal. After filing hearings, the trial court vacated its own injunction and
granted StorageTek's motion for judgment as a matter of law to vacate the jury
trial result and to find StorageTek not infringing. We have appealed these and
other court rulings. The defendants also cross-appealed certain other court
rulings. In July 1999 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed
the trial court's judgement of non-infringement and reinstated the verdict of
$70.6 million. StorageTek has filed a petition for rehearing by either the three
judge panel that decided the case or en banc, i.e. by all of the active judges
on the court. A decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals is pending this
petition.
Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
NONE
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
NONE.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
NONE.
Item 5. Other Information
NONE.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
27. Financial Data Schedule
(b) None
22
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ODETICS, INC.
(Registrant)
By /s/ Gregory A. Miner
--------------------------------------------
Gregory A. Miner
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
By /s/ Gary Smith
--------------------------------------------
Gary Smith
Vice President, Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Dated: August 16, 1999
------------------
23
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START> APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1999
<CASH> 1,734
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 18,249
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 14,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 40,437
<PP&E> 52,531
<DEPRECIATION> (30,529)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 80,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 24,188
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 906
<OTHER-SE> 29,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 80,587
<SALES> 22,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 22,075
<CGS> 15,363
<TOTAL-COSTS> 15,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 12,738
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 617
<INCOME-PRETAX> (6,643)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (6,643)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (6,643)
<EPS-BASIC> (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED> (.74)
</TABLE>
