SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
----------------
Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported) May 15, 2000
---------------
NORTH FORK BANCORPORATION, INC.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
DELAWARE 1-20458 36-3154608
- ---------------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER) (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
275 Broadhollow Road Melville, New York 11747
----------------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) (516) 844-1004
---------------------
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.
On May 15, 2000, North Fork Bancorporation, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("North Fork") filed Amendment No. 3 to its registration
statement (the "Registration Statement") on Form S-4 with the Securities
and Exchange Commission relating to the offer (the "Offer") by North Fork
to exchange 0.9302 shares of North Fork common stock and $2.00 in cash for
each outstanding share of common stock of Dime Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Dime"), including the associated preferred share purchase
rights issued pursuant to the Dime stockholder protection rights plan. This
current report on Form 8-K contains information updating certain
information contained in the Registration Statement.
1. Dime Federal Securities Litigation.
On May 15, 2000, Dime filed a motion to dismiss the
counterclaims brought by North Fork in Dime's federal securities law
litigation against North Fork and to strike certain affirmative
defenses raised by North Fork in its answer to Dime's first amended
complaint in that litigation.
2. Dime Litigation Against Salomon Smith Barney.
On May 15, 2000, Dime filed a First Amended Complaint with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, in its
litigation against Salomon Smith Barney. The amended complaint names
both Salomon Smith Barney and North Fork as defendants.
As against defendant Salomon Smith Barney, the amended
complaint alleges that Dime's 1997 engagement letter with Salomon
Smith Barney, which was executed in connection with Dime's retention
of Salomon Smith Barney as its financial advisor with respect to
Dime's acquisition of North American Mortgage Company in 1997,
prohibited Salomon Smith Barney from disclosing any confidential
information about Dime to any entity or advising any entity
interested in acquiring or otherwise entering into a business
combination transaction with Dime unless Salomon obtained Dime's
prior written consent, and that Salomon Smith Barney breached this
agreement by advising North Fork with respect to its exchange offer
without obtaining Dime's prior consent.
The amended complaint seeks the following relief as against
Salomon Smith Barney: (i) an order permanently enjoining Salomon from
providing financial or advisory services to North Fork in connection
with its exchange offer and related proxy solicitations; (ii) an
unspecified amount of damages; (iii) costs and disbursements of the
action; and (iv) such further relief as the court may deem just and
proper.
As against defendant North Fork, the amended complaint alleges
that North Fork intentionally interfered with, and caused Salomon
Smith Barney to breach, its 1997 engagement letter with Dime. Dime
has based its tortious interference with contract claim against North
Fork on allegations that (i) an engagement letter between North Fork
and Salomon Smith Barney expressly states that Salomon Smith Barney
would use information provided by Dime to provide advice to North
Fork, (ii) North Fork was obligated under its 1998 confidentiality
and standstill agreement with Dime to ascertain whether Salomon Smith
Barney was prohibited from disclosing information about Dime to North
Fork, (iii) because of this alleged obligation, North Fork was aware
that the 1997 engagement letter between Salomon Smith Barney and Dime
prohibited Salomon Smith Barney from disclosing confidential
information about Dime or advising North Fork in connection with a
business combination transaction with Dime without Dime's consent,
and (iv) North Fork nonetheless intentionally induced Salomon Smith
Barney to breach its agreement with Dime by retaining Salomon Smith
Barney to advise it in connection with its exchange offer for Dime
stock, because "North Fork sought to obtain intimate knowledge of the
business and operations of Dime and [North American Mortgage Company],
knowledge no other investment banker had."
Dime's amended complaint seeks the following relief as against
North Fork: (i) an unspecified amount of damages; (ii) costs and
disbursements of the action; and (iii) such other relief as the court
may deem just and proper.
North Fork believes that the claims made by Dime against North
Fork in the amended complaint are without merit and intends to
contest Dime's claims vigorously.
3. Dime Savings Employee Solicitation Litigation.
On May 8, 2000, Dime's principal subsidiary, The Dime Savings
Bank of New York, FSB ("Dime Savings"), filed a complaint and a
motion for preliminary injunction against North Fork and its
subsidiary, North Fork Bank, in New York State Supreme Court. Dime
Savings' complaint alleges that the defendants breached a
non-solicitation provision contained in a confidentiality agreement
originally entered into between North Fork and KeyBank National
Association ("KeyBank"), whose rights allegedly were assigned to Dime
Savings when Dime Savings purchased certain KeyBank branches in 1999.
Dime Savings alleged that the defendants breached this provision by
allegedly soliciting three Dime Savings employees to work at North
Fork Bank. Dime Savings also alleges that these employees took with
them confidential information about Dime Savings customers and then
began soliciting certain of those customers, allegedly in violation
of codes of conduct allegedly signed by these employees while
employed by Dime Savings.
The defendants believe Dime Savings' claims are without merit
and on May 15, 2000, filed an opposition to Dime Savings' preliminary
injunction motion. On May 17, 2000, the defendants filed a motion to
dismiss Dime Savings' complaint. Also on May 17, Dime Savings sought
expedited discovery from the defendants, and also sought to adjourn
the preliminary injunction motion so that it would have an
opportunity to submit a reply brief. The request for an adjournment
was denied and the court scheduled a hearing for the following
afternoon to discuss the request for expedited discovery.
On May 18, 2000, the defendants filed a brief in opposition to
Dime Savings' request for expedited discovery. That same day, the
court denied Dime Savings' request for expedited discovery and set up
a briefing schedule for the opposition and reply briefs concerning
the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.
On May 19, 2000, Dime Savings submitted a letter to the court
in which it withdrew without prejudice its motion for a preliminary
injunction.
4. Regulatory Approval of the Offer.
On May 15, 2000, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department
of Justice issued a civil investigative demand on North Fork seeking
information relating to North Fork and the Offer, including
information concerning any agreements, arrangements or understandings
between North Fork and Fleet Boston Corporation.
5. Press Release.
On May 17, 2000, North Fork held an investor conference call
and issued a press release with respect to certain matters relating to the
Offer. A copy of the press release, which includes a copy of the prepared
remarks delivered on the investor conference call by John A. Kanas,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North Fork, is filed
herewith as Exhibit 99.1.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND EXHIBITS.
(c) Exhibits
99.1 Text of press release issued by North Fork on May 17, 2000.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunder duly authorized.
Dated: May 22, 2000
NORTH FORK BANCORPORATION, INC.
By: /s/ Daniel M. Healy
----------------------------------
Name: Daniel M. Healy
Title: Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number Description
99.1 Text of press release issued by North Fork on May 17, 2000.
EXHIBIT 99.1
NORTH FORK BANCORP
275 BROADHOLLOW ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747 (631) 844-1258 FAX (631) 844-1471
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: DANIEL M. HEALY
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(631) 844-1258
CONTACT: JEREMY FIELDING OR
ROBERT SIEGFRIED
KEKST AND COMPANY, INC.
(212) 521-4800
NORTH FORK TO ALLOW FLEETBOSTON TO BID FOR DIME
NORTH FORK TO SOLICIT PROXIES AT DIME ANNUAL MEETING
MELVILLE, N.Y. - MAY 17, 2000 - NORTH FORK BANCORPORATION, INC.
(NYSE: NFB) announced today that it is releasing FleetBoston Financial
Corp. from the restriction contained in a stock purchase agreement that
prohibited FleetBoston from seeking to acquire Dime Bancorp, Inc. As
previously reported, FleetBoston has agreed to invest $250 million in North
Fork in connection with North Fork's proposed acquisition of Dime. North
Fork said it does not know whether or not FleetBoston plans to bid for
Dime. North Fork said it took this action to eliminate any remaining
excuses that Dime could possibly have to justify not selling Dime now.
North Fork also said that it intends to solicit proxies from Dime's
shareholders to withhold authority for Dime's director nominees at Dime's
annual shareholders meeting. Dime has yet to announce a date for its annual
meeting. John Adam Kanas, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of North Fork Bancorporation, said that "Dime shareholders, by withholding
authority for Dime's director nominees, will be sending a clear and
unequivocal message to Dime's Board of Directors that Dime's shareholders
do not support any plan of Dime to remain independent and that Dime
shareholders want Dime to be sold in the near term."
Attached is a copy of prepared remarks being delivered today on an
investor conference call by Mr. Kanas.
--------------------------------------------
"For several weeks now we have been observing Dime's behavior. During
this period we have remained silent while Mr. Toal has publicly attacked
our company, taken credit for Dime's new stock price and even slapped
himself on the back in a congratulatory gesture taking credit for
terminating the Hudson United merger. We are now convinced that Mr. Toal is
setting up all Dime shareholders for a major disappointment. Simply stated,
we believe he is setting the stage for Dime to declare that it is not the
"right time" to sell the company and they intend to pursue a course of
independence. We believe that Dime management has assessed their ability to
survive after declaring this course of action and determined that, although
it will lead to a lower stock price and great acrimony between the company
and its shareholders, no one, including us, will be willing to spend the
time and money necessary to wrestle this company away from them.
"Before I explain why I believe so strongly in this theory, I want to
comment on several subjects and correct the record that we believe Mr. Toal
has been trying so desperately to distort.
"The current management team took control of Dime in 1996. Let's look
at their accomplishments thus far. They brought you the acquisition of two
small thrifts, BFS Bancorp in 1996 and Lakeview Savings in New Jersey in
1998. They gave you North American Mortgage Company for $374,000,000 in
1997 and tried to bring you Dime-Hudson United in 2000. Oh yes, let me not
forget the infamous acquisition of the Key Long Island branches for a 16%
deposit premium. And they question our experience?
"In a further attempt to keep everyone's eye off the ball, Mr. Toal
has had the audacity to criticize North Fork's earnings as compared to Dime
recently. Even slightly informed observers are aware that North Fork's
earnings performance place it among the very top of all commercial banks in
the country. In fact, just this week US Banker again named North Fork Bank
the number one performing bank in the United States based upon historic
performance over a three and five year period.
"We could go on all day poking fun at and pointing out the folly of
Dime management's recent actions, not the least of which, by the way, is
their pathetic attempt to take credit for killing the Hudson deal, which
Mr. Toal said in an interview with the Daily Deal "wasn't in the best
interest of shareholders." That would be fun but fruitless. Instead, we
intend to take action designed to ensure that Dime shareholders get full
value for their company.
"Dime has now supposedly undertaken a "comprehensive exploration of
all strategic options in light of their corporate strategy." Do you know
what this really means? We think we do - and it is not good news for Dime
shareholders. We think it means that Dime believes it can do whatever it
feels like, including remaining independent, and that is what we think
they're going to do.
"On Thursday, May 9th, Larry Toal was interviewed by the Daily Deal.
Among other questions he was asked was the following: "Do you think it's
necessary strategically to merge?
Do you need to do a deal at all?"
Mr. Toal answered: "One of the questions the board will have to look
at is the time of the market. That's what I mean when I say we want to
assess the market. Part of that is if we are going to do any
transaction whether this would be the right time or not..."
"We believe that statement taken together with other statements
demonstrate that there exists no serious intent on Dime's part to sell this
company to anyone.
"We believe the end result of Dime's strategic initiative is plainly
predictable. Sooner or later (and probably later) they will announce those
results in a cleverly worded release informing the world that as a result
of the "comprehensive exploration" they have determined that it is not the
right time to sell their company and North Fork is certainly not the right
buyer. They will fail to explain why, during their road show pitching the
Hudson merger, they specifically pointed to North Fork Bank as a bank they
aspired to look and trade like. They will rely on no one asking them that
question. If Dime announces a course of independence, shareholders will be
locked into an investment that historically has been an underperformer.
Although rumors have been fueled of other potential bidders, we are unable
to unearth one shred of evidence that either ABN Amro or HSBC has a serious
interest in the bank.
"The fact that Dime couldn't get shareholder approval for its Hudson
deal can only be construed one way - and that is that Dime shareholders
want Dime sold now. Larry Toal has the nerve to say, and I quote "The
advantage of having the merger termination behind us is that it gives us
the opportunity to reach out to our investors, and we've been getting very
positive feedback. They think we did the right thing..."
"He appears to actually believe that stockholders are applauding some
action that he was responsible for. In fact, all that stockholders were
applauding was the death of an ill-conceived deal that Toal was responsible
for and the fact that shareholders now believe that Dime will be sold. Does
he honestly believe that shareholders want any outcome other than the sale
of the Dime? Does Larry Toal honestly believe that Dime's stock price would
be where it is now in the absence of our offer and the expectation that
Dime will be sold in the near term?
"Ever since we announced our offer on March 5th, Dime has refused to
meet with us to discuss it. They hid behind the merger agreement with
Hudson. Now they are hiding behind their "comprehensive exploration," and
cite this as the reason why it is inappropriate to talk to us. It is time
for the Dime management to stop hiding and take their collective heads out
of the sand. If they really believe there are serious risks with our offer,
then it would be prudent and responsible for them to talk to us about these
purported risks. Larry Toal has been fond of saying that Dime "knows North
Fork's operations well." Well, we know Dime's operations well also, and
that in part is why we believe there is low execution risk to our deal and
why we have confidence in our cost savings estimates.
"As a sign of how serious we are to bring about a sale of this
company, we will be formally notifying Fleet later today that it is
released from the standstill agreement not to bid on the Dime. We think
this should eliminate any remaining excuses that Dime can possibly think of
to justify not selling the bank. It should be made clear that North Fork
intends to continue to pursue its offer to Dime shareholders vigorously and
we again reiterate our twice turned-down offer to meet with Dime management
in order to have them help us justify a higher price for the company and to
allow us to allay their purported concerns about the risks of our deal. We
strongly encourage all Dime shareholders to tender their shares promptly
and help us to encourage the Dime board in order to ensure that this
company gets sold to someone.
"When we proposed our offer for the Dime, they spent less than a day
considering it. Mr. Toal said that unlike Hudson United we are not a good
partner because we are thrift-like and had grown too fast and there were
integration risks to this proposal. He recently added that our financial
performance was suspect. Does anyone really believe that we are more
thrift-like than Hudson United or Dime itself? Does anyone really believe
we have grown with less discipline than Hudson United? Does anyone really
believe that Dime management is acting in the best interest of their
shareholders? We for one do not. It's time for the board of Dime to take
control of this company before more value is destroyed.
"The result of Dime's last comprehensive exploration of strategic
options was to recommend to us a merger of equals with Hudson United. That
drove down the price of the stock below $12.00. No one can take the chance
that their next recommendation will be any less management friendly and any
more shareholder centric.
"North Fork gave Dime shareholders the vehicle by which to force Dime
to change course by providing them with an alternative to the Hudson United
deal.
"We must now turn to you, Dime's shareholders, in order to take the
second step. Your tendered shares are an effective way to send a message
that you want Dime sold. Without the encouragement that that will give the
Dime board, I believe this company will remain independent indefinitely. We
ask you to cast your vote on the fate of this company by tendering now. In
addition, we intend to solicit proxies from Dime stockholders to withhold
authority for Dime's director nominees at the Dime annual meeting, whenever
Dime gets around to holding it. By withholding authority for Dime's
nominees, you will be sending a clear and unequivocal message to Dime's
Board of Directors that you do not support any plan on the part of Dime to
remain independent and that you want Dime sold now. Without your support,
we all run the risk of seeing this situation stagnate and eventually losing
the increased value Dime shares have gained as a result of our offer. Only
shareholders can keep this process alive."
Investors and security holders are advised to read North Fork's
registration statement and tender offer statement with respect to its
exchange offer for Dime common stock, North Fork's proxy statement with
respect to North Fork's proposed solicitation of proxies from Dime
stockholders in connection with Dime's 2000 annual meeting of stockholders
(when it becomes available), and any amendments or supplements to any of
such documents (when they become available), because each of these
documents contains, or will contain, important information. Investors and
security holders may obtain a free copy of the exchange offer registration
statement, the tender offer statement, the proxy statement (when it becomes
available), any amendments or supplements to any of such documents (when
they become available), and any other documents filed by North Fork with
the SEC, at the SEC's Internet web site at www.sec.gov. Each of these
documents may also be obtained free of charge by overnight mail or direct
electronic transmission by calling North Fork's information agent, D.F.
King & Co., Inc. toll-free at 1-800-755-7250.
North Fork, its directors and executive officers and certain other persons
may be deemed to be "participants" in North Fork's solicitation of proxies
from Dime stockholders. A detailed list of the names, affiliations and
interests of the participants in the solicitation is contained in North
Fork's definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2000, with respect to its
previous solicitation of Dime stockholders in connection with the vote on
the proposed merger of Dime and Hudson United Bancorp.
# # #
