FORM 10-KSB
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996 Commission File No. 0-10772
ESSEX CORPORATION
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Virginia 54-0846569
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
9150 Guilford Road, Columbia, Maryland 21046
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number: (301) 939-7000
SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
None None
SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.10 PER SHARE
(Title of Each Class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. X
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $12,939,341
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average
bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within the past 60
days. $2,775,938 as of February 28, 1997
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common equity, as of the latest practicable date.
CLASS OUTSTANDING AT FEBRUARY 28, 1997
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share 3,626,098
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
DOCUMENT PART OF REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB INTO
WHICH DOCUMENT IS INCORPORATED
Portions of Exhibits filed with (i) Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 (No. 33-82920); (ii) 1995 Form 10-KSB; and
(iii) Form 8-K dated November 13, 1996 Part III, Item 13(a)(2)
=====================================================
A list of the Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Report on Form
10-KSB appears on page 33.
1
<PAGE>
Table of Contents
FORM 10-KSB
Essex Corporation
PART I
Item No. Page
-- INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT.............................................. 3
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS... ......................................... 3
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES........................................... 10
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................................... 11
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS................. 11
PART II
5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS............ 13
6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION........... 13
7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS................................................ 20
8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE................................................ 20
PART III
9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT................... 21
10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.............................................. 26
11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT...... 31
12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS...................... 32
13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.................................... 33
2
<PAGE>
PART I
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
The information contained in this report pertains to the registrant, Essex
Corporation (the "Company").
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
The Company was incorporated in Virginia in 1969 to provide professional
engineering and scientific services to support U.S. Government defense, space
and energy programs. The Company is embarked on a vigorous program of
development of proprietary optoelectronic processors with significant
performance advantages over conventional computers and specialized image
processing devices. The Company is endeavoring to bring such optoelectronic
processors to commercial markets.
Substantially all of the current revenues of the Company are derived from
its traditional, core technical services and products business in the following
principal fields of interest:
o Simulators, Trainers and Interactive Training Materials
o Systems Engineering, Logistics and Information Technology
o Mechanical and Electromechanical Assembly
o Human Performance Measurement and Human Error Avoidance
The Company's Systems Effectiveness Division, headquartered in McLean,
Virginia, and its Federal Systems Division, headquartered in Columbia, Maryland,
operate in both government and commercial markets. They apply the capabilities
of the Company in various combinations to solve problems in such business areas
as Aerospace, Security, Military Operations Other than War, Ship and Submarine
Maintenance Planning, and Satellite Communications Systems
Engineering.
Since 1988, Company management has recognized that its core support
business, although self-sustaining, depended heavily on declining government
budgets. Accordingly, the Company's strategic plan for growth in both government
and industrial sectors has been focused upon: (1) fields with
better-than-average potential for market growth and (2) development of
proprietary high-technology products. With respect to products, the Company
determined to identify and enter a field that provided both growth and relative
ease of discrimination.
OPTOELECTRONIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES BUSINESS SECTOR
In mid-1989 in furtherance of its product objectives, the Company acquired
a small company with capabilities in systems engineering and high-speed,
relatively low-cost, signal processors for the Intelligence Community. The
Company's technical team has designed, developed and sold special purpose
optoelectronic processors for more than a decade. This experience was gained
largely in performing classified military research and development. While the
Company continues to perform such critical work, its internal resources are
largely devoted to industrial, medical and other applications useful in both
military and commercial sectors. The combination of optoelectronics and systems
engineering is a powerful discriminator in many markets.
3
<PAGE>
Optoelectronic processors are compact, integrated systems of optical and
electronic devices that perform specific, commercially-valuable mathematical
calculations at very high speeds. This technology has many advantages,
including: (1) use of simple, rugged, hardware incorporating proven, mature,
reliable components; (2) high-performance implementation of demanding signal and
image processing computations; and (3) providing such desirable characteristics
in economical, compact, low power-consuming packages. In the opinion of the
Company, this technology provides the Company strong, well-discriminated
proprietary capabilities to supply state-of-the-art products in such important
fields as imaging, holography, pattern recognition, communications and signal
processing. New products are considered only for markets to which they bring a
10-fold to 100-fold performance advantage in either throughput or throughput per
watt of power used.
IMSYN(TM) PROCESSOR - The Company has diligently pursued application of its
proven laser-based optoelectronic technologies toward the realization of the
patented ImSyn(TM) processor. The ImSyn(TM) processor implements the well-known
Fourier transform formula that is basic to numerous image and signal processing
applications. Further, it does so with a performance that often far exceeds
conventional technology which relies on the FAST Fourier transform (FFT)
algorithm (computer program) to maximize performance.
The name ImSyn(TM), which stands for "image synthesis", was selected
because the processor is useful in many image processing modalities, although
its utility extends beyond such applications. Image processing can be grouped
into two categories: (1) image reconstruction (or synthesis), and (2)
post-processing image enhancement (or analysis). The first refers to the
computation of an image from data measured by a particular sensor such as a
radar or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) device. The second involves improving
the image, identifying important features and otherwise exploiting the picture.
For certain image reconstruction applications, particularly synthetic
aperture radar (SAR) and fast MRI, conventional technology is too slow,
expensive, and often too bulky and energy inefficient. This problem affects the
overall utility of such applications and limits their use. The high throughput,
flexibility, compact size and low power requirements of the ImSyn(TM) processor
allow its use in fast MRI and SAR. The SAR market niches include aerospace
platforms and transportable ground systems where size, weight and power are most
critical, as well as fixed workstations. In addition, ImSyn(TM) technology
enables new applications in digital holography and synthetic aperture microscopy
(SAM), ultrasound and sonar, that are not otherwise practical.
Synthetic aperture microscopy was invented by the Company.
A prototype ImSyn(TM) Processor was completed in mid 1996. Three initial
units were assembled and two were delivered under contracts in January 1997. An
additional 10 units based on this initial design have been released for
manufacture and 3-5 units are expected to be completed in the first half of
1997.
IMSYN(TM) PROCESSOR COMMERCIALIZATION - The Company has identified many market
niches for image processing applications. In any given market niche, there will
be end-users with direct applications and original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) that can incorporate ImSyn(TM) processors in their products to improve
performance or reduce cost. The Company is concentrating on the OEM sector
because it is readily accessible and less expensive to serve, and because most
users prefer to buy fully integrated systems. In the case of MRI, however,
market
4
<PAGE>
entry is controlled by the prominent MRI research institutions upon which the
OEMs depend for new product and applications information. Accordingly, the
Company is keeping the OEM community informed on its progress while actively
contacting "luminary" researchers. Contacts have been made with both OEMs and
research institutions to inform potential users and begin generation of sales
leads.
In this connection, the State of Maryland has made two cooperative grants
with the Company to the Radiology Department of the University of Maryland
Medical School under the Maryland Industrial Partnerships (MIPS) program. The
purpose of these grants is to finance application studies by the Radiology
Department to determine the most effective uses of the ImSyn(TM) processor in
reconstructing MR images. The principal direction of the work in process is
toward real-time processing of very fast MRI to permit doctors to evaluate
dynamic parts of the body such as the beating heart and thinking brain. One fast
MRI technique, EPI (echo-planar imaging), is now being offered by major OEMs
such as GE Medical Systems, Siemens Medical Systems and Picker, but without the
high-performance processing required for real-time imagery.
The Company's marketing strategy is designed to allow each niche to be
covered by five or fewer sales representatives or consultants. They will be
supported by a tailored public relations campaign for purposes of education and
lead generation. Essex has retained a technically advanced sales consultant with
an extensive marketing background in the medical imaging marketplace. Military
end-use marketing and sales continue to be carried out by key employees and
outside sales consultants who have conducted such efforts successfully, both
directly to government agencies and indirectly through aerospace electronic
prime contractors.
OTHER OPTOELECTRONIC ENGINES - In addition to the ImSyn(TM) processor, the
Company's other work in process includes Radar Signal Processors, Image and Data
Correlators, and Telecommunications Switching Arrays. Each of these computing
engines can be used in a variety of applications. However, in contrast to
desktop and other familiar "general purpose" computers applied to computing,
word processing and other applications, they are "special purpose" units, albeit
very flexible ones. Note that only the Company's ImSyn(TM) Processor has
advanced to the commercial production phase.
A proof-of-principle model of the Company's Hawkeye(TM)
acousto-optic/digital radar signal processor was constructed under the terms of
an ongoing U.S. Army contract covering testing, evaluation and upgrade. Its
principal discriminating capability is that it can process high- definition
radar returns from advanced wide bandwidth radars with high computational
efficiency in a compact, light-weight, inexpensive package. Such real time
computation of high resolution images from wideband signals using digital
technology alone requires extremely high analog to digital conversion rates and
data processing throughput which tends to be impractical with state- of-the-art
digital electronics. It is potentially applicable to fixed, mobile and shipboard
anti- missile radar systems.
Under the Company's Egret(TM) correlator program, the ImSyn(TM) processor
technology is being used to demonstrate the pattern recognition capability of
optoelectronic processors to the U.S. Air Force. This program is partially
financed by a $730,000 U.S. Air Force technology demonstration contract entered
into in 1994 and now scheduled for completion in mid-1997. The goal of the
resulting system is to be able to identify individual objects such as tanks,
mobile missile launchers, or other known objects in an image. Similar
discriminations could be useful
5
<PAGE>
in medical radiology or pathology. In the future, the Company intends to seek
program financing to build a much higher speed correlator that will out perform
the functions of the demonstration system.
Under its Iris(TM) program, the Company is in the early stages of
developing a family of optoelectronic telecommunications channelizers and
switches. These products will be targeted at the mobile wireless and satellite
telecommunications markets. The advantages of optoelectronic processors,
especially their size and energy efficiency, are expected to be attractive to
these markets. The technology can be implemented for TDMA (Time Division
Multiple Access), FDMA (Frequency Division Multiple Access) or CDMA (Code
Division Multiple Access) modulation schemes. Iris(TM) technology has been
studied for use on a planned satellite under a small research contract.
Several other optoelectronic processors are under study or preliminary
development by the Company. Related applications and exploratory development
activities are being partially financed under the terms of one former commercial
and several current government contracts. The latter consist of a mixture of
direct contracts from agencies of the U.S. Government and a subcontract from a
major aerospace electronics company. Additional government contracts and
strategic partnerships with companies active in applicable markets are being
sought.
CORE TECHNICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS BUSINESS SECTOR
In accordance with its business strategy, the Company has focused its core
business activities increasingly upon commercial and government business
opportunities expected to provide significant growth and above average
comparative profitability. Business development resources are being judiciously
applied to concentrate, enhance the quality and improve the performance of the
Company in new and historically served business areas. The Company continues to
provide professional services composed of a variety of technologies. Several
business areas and key programs expected to have better than average growth
potential are described below.
HUMANITARIAN DEMINING - The Company is well respected by the international
community as a source of solutions to the critical challenge posed by more than
100 million land mines impeding economic development in 60 countries. Because
people are unwilling to risk life and limb under such conditions, a small number
of antipersonnel mines that may cost only a dollar or two each, distributed over
a wide area, can impede farming, mining and transportation. Under contract, the
Company developed rapidly accessible compact disk programs to facilitate
interactive training on the land mine threat. Now in use in Bosnia, earlier
versions were used in Desert Storm. The Company's products are multilingual and
feature not only detailed information on all such mines of the world, but also
means to produce posters, T-shirts, scarves and other public information
materials. These are used by U.S. Special Forces in-country teams to create
awareness of the threat to which women and children are particularly vulnerable
when gathering firewood and performing other domestic tasks. The Company offers
related logistic support and training services with a variety of partners for
long-term demining campaigns.
MAINTENANCE TRAINERS - The Company's extensive experience in this field includes
trainers for NASA mission specialists, advanced maintenance trainers for U.S.
Navy reconnaissance aircraft and other applications. The Company also operates
as a subcontractor to major aerospace
6
<PAGE>
electronic contractors. Various combinations of mechanical, electromechanical,
electronic and computer technologies are used to meet those objectives.
SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING - In 1990, the Company became
Motorola's first Industrial Partner on the IRIDIUM(R) satellite constellation
that will provide global wireless communications to handheld telephones and
pagers. The Company's employees have been named on more than a dozen Motorola
patent disclosures. Built upon the extensive base of related business with the
U.S. Government, this activity includes performance of systems analysis and
development of computer software to model performance and plan the operation of
the satellite constellation. The Company has long provided excellent systems
engineering services in signal and image processing and communications to
industrial, commercial and government customers. Such capability is pivotally
important in matching products to real world applications. The Company's systems
engineering capability is a major asset and key discriminator in its programs to
design and apply its optoelectronic computers.
LOGISTIC SUPPORT - The Company has provided logistic engineering support to the
U.S. Navy submarine program for nearly two decades. Currently, the Company
performs maintenance planning, configuration control, human error avoidance, and
information management analysis for database architecture and support. Logistic
and training support are being provided to the U.S. Department of Energy to help
assure safe, protected transportation of military nuclear assets. The Company
has developed extensive expertise in reliability engineering, training materials
and trainer development, CD/ROM document compaction, configuration management,
safety, human error reduction, material support and other specialties. The
Company is skilled in planning, scheduling and supporting maintenance activities
in complex systems for industrial enterprises, and was awarded in February 1995
a five-year program for $6.2 million from the U.S. Navy for engineering and
maintenance support.
* * *
CONTRACT MIX
Services of the Company are performed under cost-reimbursement (63% and 59%
of revenues in 1996 and 1995), fixed-price (16% and 19% in 1996 and 1995) or
time and material (21% and 22% in 1996 and 1995) contracts and subcontracts.
Fixed-price contracts have a greater degree of risk and higher potential reward
than cost-type contracts since the Company is obligated to provide specific
deliverables within the confines of the contracted price.
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
The major portion of the Company's revenues has been derived from
contracts, or subcontracts thereunder, with departments or agencies of the
United States Government, primarily the military services and other departments
and agencies of the Department of Defense (DoD). In 1996 and 1995, approximately
83% and 82%, respectively, of the Company's total revenues were derived from
government contracts or subcontracts. Revenues from contracts or subcontracts
from DoD programs were 50% and 48% of total revenues in 1996 and 1995,
respectively. Government military programs include work principally with the
Navy, and to a lesser extent with the Army, Air Force and other DoD entities.
The Company is also under contract to the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA), the Department of
7
<PAGE>
Energy (DoE), the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Office of Personnel Management and the National Science
Foundation. The Company also works with industrial companies, architectural and
engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and research institutions.
The Company's largest contract is to support the Transportation Safeguards
Division, DoE, Kirtland Air Force Base, NM. This contract is to develop and
conduct training for nuclear materials couriers. Begun in late 1993, a contract
for $16.3 million for the entire project was negotiated and definitized in March
1994. This contract is funded on an annual basis by the DoE. The Company is in
the fourth year (first option year) for renewed support of DoE Transportation
Safeguards Division, with one following option year expected. There will be the
normal competitive procurement process which the Company will participate in for
the continuation of this contract in late 1997 - early 1998. The contract
accounted for 19% ($2.5 million) and 19% ($2.7 million) of total revenues for
1996 and 1995, respectively.
The Company has contracts with the U.S. Navy to provide engineering and
logistics support for various undersea programs. Revenues derived from these
programs were 15% ($2 million) and 14% ($2 million) of total revenues for 1996
and 1995, respectively.
In 1994, the Company was competitively awarded a $3.6 million program to
design and build aviation trainers for the U.S. Navy. The Company is completing
mechanical, electrical and software design, engineering and production of a
total of 172 trainers of eight types for delivery to the Naval Air Station in
Pensacola, Florida. Revenues from this program were $490,000 (4%) in 1996 and
$1.6 million (11%) in 1995. This program is scheduled for completion in early
1997.
The Company has proposals outstanding on other key contracts for human
performance research, optical systems development, equipment manufacturing, and
training materials production.
COMMERCIAL PROGRAMS AND PRODUCTS
The Company is endeavoring to expand the commercial portion of its
business. The Company expects that significant personnel and financial resources
will continue to be applied to the targeted commercial products areas. The
Company's efforts to date have been focused in the following areas.
The Company continues work which began in 1990 with Motorola, Inc.,
assisting in the design of the Iridium(R) satellite constellation that will
provide global wireless communications to handheld telephones and pagers. The
Company's engineers develop and use software to model satellite and
intersatellite communications links to assess system capacity and availability,
and help develop channel-assignment algorithms for maximizing system capacity.
The Company's engineers are named on several pending Motorola patents which are
integral to Iridium(R) system performance. The Company is also involved in
modeling the paging component of the system and user location determination
systems. The Company's contract to perform such work generated over 16% ($2.2
million) of revenues in 1996 and 16% ($2.3 million) in 1995.
The Company is developing acousto-optic hardware utilizing its proprietary
ImSyn(TM) processor and other units. These products are both stand-alone
commercial items for end-users, and units
8
<PAGE>
to be sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for inclusion in their
products. The Company is directly marketing such products using employee and
outside sales personnel to make OEM and other customer contacts. It will also
obtain such contacts by using direct mail and other traditional advertising
approaches, such as new product releases, technical and trade journal articles
and features, space advertising, participation in trade shows, participation in
trade missions as appropriate and other opportunities deemed by the Company to
be cost-effective and consistent with the professional nature of the Company's
products. As such products are generally compact in size and weight,
distribution to customers would be through normal third-party shipping means
from the Company's facilities. The Company's products are offered not only to
improve capability but also to improve size, cost and power consumption. Such
OEMs generally have established marketing and distribution channels for products
in which the Company's devices would be utilized.
PATENTS
On January 7, 1992, the Company was awarded its first patent, "Sequential
Image Synthesizer". On January 24, 1995, another patent, "Image Synthesis Using
Time Sequential Holography" ("1995 patent"), was issued. Foreign patent
applications covering the major industrial nations are pending. These patents
are for the new image processing technology which the Company calls ImSyn(TM).
U.S. patents generally expire 17 years from the date of issue.
Based on an optical signal processing approach, the invention enables the
generation of imagery data at throughput rates which can be ten to one hundred
times faster than conventional technology. These patents are the first of
several patents that the Company expects to obtain covering ImSyn(TM) and
related imaging technology. The Company has begun to apply the ImSyn(TM)
technology to speeding image construction in two diverse fields: magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) and synthetic aperture radar (SAR). The Company is also
developing a synthetic aperture microscope first patented in the 1995 patent and
extended in a patent pending. The microscope relies on the ImSyn(TM) technology
in addition to a new sensing procedure. The Company also plans to apply the
ImSyn(TM) technology to ultrasonic, acoustic, sonar and seismological imaging
modalities. These technologies have broad application in medicine, earth
resources and industrial non-destructive testing.
In SAR, the Company is testing systems with substantial benefits in rapidly
forming imagery from aircraft, earth resources satellites, or remotely piloted
vehicles. The major advantages of ImSyn(TM) systems are that they are relatively
inexpensive, rugged, small, light in weight and consume little power.
U.S. patents for the invention of the True Time Delay Beam Former (TTD)
have been issued to the Company. TTD enables accurate electronic steering of
exceedingly broadband array antennas for aircraft, space, maritime and ground
systems.
COMPETITION
Competition for U.S. Government professional and technical services
contracts has grown in intensity and proposals have become increasingly costly
during the past several years. This stimulated the Company to initiate its
program to develop proprietary products and services. As such proprietary items
are developed, the Company has relied increasingly upon offers of its
specialized capabilities, sharply reducing resources applied in response to
proposals for professional and technical services. Examples of such proprietary
items include ImSyn(TM)
9
<PAGE>
processor products, and products and services directed toward Humanitarian
Demining databases and training. The Company endeavors to control human error in
a variety of settings by applying its well-established capabilities in
Human-Centered Systems Engineering(sm), such as CD/ROM-Interactive Training and
Documentation, Human Factors Technology, Human Performance Measurement, and
Integrated Logistic Support. The Company is looking to gain increasing
competitive advantage in its chosen fields as a result of its proprietary
products and services, although larger companies with more resources will
continue to provide competition to the Company's business.
BACKLOG
As of December 29, 1996, the Company had a total backlog (funded and
unfunded) of $20.1 million as compared with $41.4 million at December 31, 1995.
Of these amounts, funded backlog was $5.9 million and unfunded was $14.2 million
at yearend 1996 as compared to $6.7 million and $34.7 million at yearend 1995.
Funded backlog generally consists of the sum of all contract amounts of work for
which funding has been approved and contracts signed, less the value of work
performed under such contracts. Even though such contracts are fully funded by
appropriations, they may be subject to other risks inherent in government
contracts, such as termination for the convenience of the government. Unfunded
backlog declined by approximately $15 million due to the mutual agreement
between the Company and the U.S. Government to terminate the remaining 4 years
of a manufacturing and technical support contract as actual and projected
revenue volumes were significantly below those anticipated by the Company under
the contract.
EMPLOYEES
As of February 28, 1997, the Company had approximately 231 employees, of
which 160 were full-time employees.
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
OFFICE FACILITIES
The Company leases most of its offices and other facilities. The Company's
corporate headquarters and offices for certain of its operations of its Federal
Systems Division (FSD) are located in a one-story building at 9150 Guilford
Road, Columbia, Maryland. The Company occupies approximately 18,000 square feet
under a lease agreement extending through early 1999. The headquarters and
offices for its Commercial Products Division (CPD) are located in an adjacent
one-story building at 9130 Guilford Road, Columbia, Maryland. CPD occupies
approximately 7,000 square feet under a lease extending through early 1999.
In addition to these offices, the Company maintains offices and plants in
connection with the performance of its business in Huntsville, Alabama; Orlando,
Florida; Portsmouth, New Hampshire; and McLean, Virginia. The Company has
assigned certain of its personnel to customer-owned facilities in Fort Rucker
and Huntsville, Alabama and Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico.
The Company plans to close its Huntsville, Alabama facility in early 1997.
This facility was constructed under a lease-purchase agreement pursuant to which
the Company would, for a nominal percentage of original construction costs,
acquire title to such property at the conclusion of the lease in 1999. This
facility is for sale and a portion of the sales proceeds will be used
10
<PAGE>
to pay off the remaining balance under the lease-purchase agreement. (See Note 4
- - Industrial Revenue Bond in the Notes to Financial Statements.) All of the
Company's other facilities are leased under standard rental agreements. The
Company believes that its present facilities are adequate for its current
business needs.
EQUIPMENT
The Company owns a variety of computer workstations, test equipment,
microcomputers, printers and reproduction equipment at several of its offices.
The Company leases computer workstations in support of customer work. Other
computer hardware and software, test equipment, word processing and reproduction
equipment used by the Company is leased.
VIDEO LABORATORY
A videotape-videodisc design laboratory is located in the Company's McLean,
Virginia office, in which broadcast-quality videotape and interactive videodisc
products are developed.
IMAGE SYNTHESIS LABORATORY
The laboratory consists of optical hardware and computer software, optical
benches and test equipment. The laboratory includes the physical property which
demonstrates and tests the capabilities of the Company's patented Image
Synthesizer (ImSyn(TM)) technology as well as other optoelectronic devices and
applications such as the Synthetic Aperture Microscope(TM).
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company was a party to a legal dispute which arose in mid 1993 with its
former landlord. This matter was settled in July 1994 and resulted in certain
obligations for the Company. See Note 6 in the Notes To Financial Statements
section for further discussion of this matter.
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On November 13, 1996, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
At the meeting, each member of the Board of Directors was elected to serve until
the next annual meeting or until their successors are duly elected and
qualified. The votes cast and withheld for each such director were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR WITHHELD
<S> <C> <C>
Harry Letaw, Jr. 3,189,503 23,745
Frank E. Manning 3,188,323 24,925
Harold P. Hanson 3,189,898 23,350
Robert W. Hicks 3,190,098 23,150
Samuel Hopkins 3,185,772 27,476
Ray M. Keeler 3,185,872 27,376
A. William Perkins 3,190,098 23,150
E. Ted Prince 3,190,098 24,968
</TABLE>
11
<PAGE>
In addition, the Company's shareholders approved the following
proposals:
Amendment of the Company's Articles of Incorporation to authorize a
class of preferred stock (1 million shares), the series and rights of
which may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors,
as follows:
FOR 2,440,940 AGAINST 294,510 ABSTAIN 50,889
--------- ------- ------
Amendment of the Company's Articles of Incorporation to increase the
number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 25,000,000 shares, as
follows:
FOR 2,988,590 AGAINST 195,727 ABSTAIN 25,272
--------- ------- ------
The adoption of the Essex Corporation 1996 Stock Option and
Appreciation Rights Plan providing for the issuance of incentive
stock options, non-qualified options and stock appreciation rights
with respect to up to 300,000 shares of Common Stock, as follows:
FOR 1,748,538 AGAINST 195,727 ABSTAIN 25,272
--------- ------- ------
The ratification of the appointment of Arthur Andersen LLP as
independent public accountants, as follows:
FOR 3,186,889 AGAINST 22,620 ABSTAIN 10,080
--------- ------ ------
12
<PAGE>
PART II
5. MARKET FOR THE COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The Company's Common Stock is traded on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market(sm)
tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market(sm) under the symbol "ESEX". However, as of
December 29, 1996 the Company is no longer in compliance with certain Nasdaq
continuing maintenance criteria which may result in Nasdaq ceasing to quote the
Company's securities. While there can be no assurance, management intends to
undertake efforts to repair compliance with the maintenance criteria as soon as
practicable.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of
the Common Stock for the periods indicated. Sales prices represent prices
between dealers, may not reflect mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not
represent actual transactions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------------------- --------------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First quarter........................ $ 3.50 $ 2.25 $ 1.63 $ 1.13
Second quarter....................... 3.63 2.63 1.63 1.00
Third quarter ....................... 3.00 2.00 3.63 1.25
Fourth quarter....................... 2.50 0.94 3.38 2.13
</TABLE>
At February 28, 1997, there were approximately 1,300 beneficial owners of
the Company's Common Stock which includes 298 holders of record.
The Company sold an additional $865,000 of 10% Convertible Collateralized
Debentures in 1996 to 20 accredited and non-accredited investors pursuant to
Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933.
The Company paid an 8% commission on debentures placed by the Placement
Agent, J. Michael Reisert, Inc. and issued 28,571 warrants in connection with
the placement of such debentures. See Notes 4 and 10 in the Notes to Financial
Statements. All investors represented that they were purchasing for investment
and the securities were appropriately legended.
6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION AND OTHER
SECTIONS CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT ARE BASED ON MANAGEMENT'S
EXPECTATIONS, ESTIMATES, PROJECTIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS. WORDS SUCH AS "EXPECTS",
"ANTICIPATES", "PLANS", "BELIEVES", "ESTIMATES", VARIATIONS OF SUCH WORDS AND
SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
THAT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, PROJECTIONS OF REVENUES, EARNINGS, SEGMENT
PERFORMANCE, CASH FLOWS AND CONTRACT AWARDS. SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE
MADE PURSUANT TO THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION
REFORM ACT OF 1995. THESE STATEMENTS ARE NOT GUARANTEES OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE
AND INVOLVE CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT.
THEREFORE, ACTUAL
13
<PAGE>
FUTURE RESULTS AND TRENDS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM WHAT IS FORECAST IN
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS DUE TO A VARIETY OF FACTORS.
Essex Corporation is a diversified, technology-based company providing
products and professional services to government and industry. Essex has
determined that it operates in two business segments: Technical Services and
Products; and Optoelectronic Products and Services. The Company allocates its
operations to the following business units.
o Systems Effectiveness Division (SED)
o Federal Systems Division (FSD)
o Commercial Products Division (CPD)
SED operates in the Technical Services and Products segment; CPD operates
in the Optoelectronics Products and Services segment; and FSD operates in both
segments.
1996 COMPARED TO 1995
TECHNICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
At December 29, 1996, the Technical Services and Products contract backlog
was $18.5 million ($4.8 million funded and $13.7 million unfunded). Funded
contract backlog generally consists of the sum of all contract amounts for which
funding has been approved and contracts signed, less the value of work performed
under such contracts. Unfunded contract backlog generally is the amount of work
on contracts which has not yet been funded (such as for option years, open
purchase orders and indefinite quantity contracts).
The costs of completing such contracts in backlog are estimated to be
92-94% of such backlog and generally result in gross profit margins of 6-8%
before such costs as interest expense, amortization of intangibles, volume
variance and income taxes. However, there can be no assurances that revenues
from this contract backlog or the gross margins therefrom will ultimately be
realized. The mix of contracts in this total backlog of approximately $18.5
million is approximately: $15.9 million (86%) in cost-plus-fee type contracts;
$1.3 million (7%) in time and material and $1.3 million (7%) in fixed-price type
contracts. Costs are charged to contracts as incurred as the Technical Services
and Products segment is generally providing labor-based services and therefore
does not normally accumulate or stock inventory. The percentage-of- completion
method of accounting is utilized for revenue recognition. Anticipated losses, if
any, are recognized as soon as they become known.
The Company has experienced difficulty in sustaining and expanding revenue
volume in certain areas of this diverse business segment. This segment is
essentially comprised of revenues in such areas as training for nuclear
materials couriers for the Department of Energy ($2.5 million in 1996 and $2.7
million in 1995); engineering and logistics support for the U.S. Navy ($2.0
million in 1996 and 1995); modeling and simulation support on satellite cellular
communications systems for Motorola, Inc. ($2.2 million in 1996 and $2.3 million
in 1995); developing, testing and assembly of humanitarian mobile demining
computer support systems for the U.S. Army (new work of $0.7 million in 1996);
and designing and manufacture of assembly of aviation maintenance trainers
("Trainers contract") for the U.S. Navy ($0.5 million in 1996 and $1.6 million
in 1995).
14
<PAGE>
The majority of such work is done on cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts which
generate modest profits, which was the case for operations in 1995. Some work,
such as the Trainers contract, is done on a fixed-price basis. In 1996, the
fixed-price work on the Trainers contract experienced significant cost overruns.
Such cost overruns exceeded the modest profits from other components of this
business segment resulting in an overall loss for this segment in 1996.
REVENUES
This segment's revenues for 1996 totaled $11,535,000, which was $1,671,000
(13%) less than the $13,206,000 reported during 1995. Revenues for 1996 were
approximately $5.2 million in SED and $6.3 million in FSD. The decrease in
revenues was primarily attributable to the lack of new work in Federal Systems
Division (Huntsville, AL location). The final portion of approximately $1.1
million of the $3.6 million contract to design and build aviation maintenance
trainers ("Trainers contract") was to be completed by FSD-Huntsville in 1996.
The Trainers contract fell behind schedule and is over budget, resulting in cost
overruns and revenue recognition of approximately $500,000 in 1996 as compared
to revenues of $1.6 million in 1995.
This contract is scheduled for completion during early 1997.
Overall, this segment is experiencing a slowdown in receipt of new awards
and funding on existing contracts with U.S. Government customers. This slowdown
is likely to continue as these customers deal with budgetary matters and post
election year issues.
INCOME/LOSS
This segment had an operating loss of $621,000 (5.4% loss) in 1996 as
compared with $766,000 (5.8% gross profit) in 1995. In this segment, the Company
experienced overruns in the final phase of the three year $3.6 million Trainers
contract to provide training devices to a U.S. Government customer. This segment
recognized approximately $1 million of loss on this program during 1996 as
compared to income of $123,000 in 1995. This program is scheduled to be
completed in early 1997.
Direct costs have increased as a percentage of revenues (71.0% in 1996 and
65.3% in 1995). The increase in direct costs in 1996 compared to 1995 is due to
the higher over budget expenditures on the Trainers contract. The indirect costs
increased primarily due to declining coverage of such expenses on the lower
revenue volume experienced in the Federal Systems Division.
OPTOELECTRONIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
In mid-1996, the Company completed initial development of its first
ImSyn(TM) processor prototype. The Company has entered the synthetic aperture
radar (SAR) imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markets. In January
1997, the Company delivered two pre-production ImSyn(TM) Processors, one for
Northrop Grumman and one for the U.S. Navy. During late 1996, the Company
initiated production plans to build ten additional ImSyn(TM) Processors which
were released to manufacture in early 1997. One field sales engineer is assigned
to each of the SAR and MRI markets. The SAR market consists of aerospace prime
contractors, subcontractors and government laboratories, while the MRI market
consists of luminary medical research centers.
15
<PAGE>
In addition, the Company is continuing to present both its ImSyn(TM) Processor
and its Synthetic Aperture Microscope design model to original equipment
manufacturers for their consideration.
The Company has ongoing efforts for further product development and
applications engineering. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles governing such engineering and development expenses, costs of
approximately $744,000 have been recognized through the Company's statements of
operations as 1996 period expenses. Such expenses were $1,254,000 in 1995.
Additional funding is necessary for commercial products' inventory buildup,
marketing and further development of commercial applications and products. In
order to partially fund such requirements, the Company issued $865,000 in 1996
and $535,000 in 1995 (totaling $1.4 million) of 10% Convertible Collateralized
Debentures. The net proceeds were used for commercial product development,
commercial inventory production and marketing.
At December 29, 1996, the Optoelectronic Products and Services segment has
a backlog of approximately $1.6 million ($1.1 million funded and $0.5 million
unfunded) which is comprised of cost-plus-fixed-fee (79%) and fixed-price (21%)
contracts from the U.S. Government. There is a contract which was received in
July 1996 included in this backlog with a value of approximately $572,000 for
delivery of an optoelectronic processor utilizing ImSyn(TM) technology and
related services to U.S. Government end-users. Another contract with a remaining
value of $246,000 is for government-sponsored research utilizing an ImSyn(TM)
unit in synthetic aperture microscope applications. Additional funding of
approximately $160,000 is included in backlog from another U.S. Government
customer to complete the prototype optoelectronic range-doppler imager and
demonstrate new radar techniques to combat ballistic missile threat.
REVENUES
This segment's revenues for 1996 totaled $1,404,000 as compared to $987,000
in 1995. During 1995, significant resources were devoted to initial prototype
development. Sales orders and work on such orders was limited in 1995 due to the
status of such development. In 1996, work on two contracts was performed and
components were being assembled for delivery of an optoelectronic processor on
each contract using ImSyn(TM) technology together with related services. Work
was also being performed on another contract for government-sponsored research
on the Company's proprietary synthetic aperture microscope technology. This
technology will utilize the ImSyn(TM) unit. Another order from a government
customer was received for an ImSyn(TM) unit and was filled from inventory and
recognized as a product sale in the first quarter of 1997.
INCOME/LOSS
This segment had an operating loss of $2,560,000 in 1996 as compared to an
operating loss of $1,853,000 in 1995. Initial revenues are comprised primarily
of services provided. In 1995, the cost of goods sold was a relatively high
percentage of such revenues (83%) as there is a small gross margin on service
revenues. For 1996, the cost of goods sold exceeded revenues because the
completion status of the fixed-price contracts to deliver an optoelectronic
correlator and on the contract to deliver the first optoelectronic processor
were negatively impacted by
16
<PAGE>
design and specification changes which caused cost overruns under the contracts.
This resulted in losses on these two jobs of $700,000 in 1996.
Beginning January 1, 1996, this segment began to establish a manufacturing
operation for optoelectronic products. As the manufacturing operation is in
start-up phase, a portion of manufacturing overhead is underabsorbed. Such
additional expenses were $226,000 in 1996 and are included in the cost of goods
and services provided.
The segment incurred expenses in connection with the development of the
initial ImSyn(TM) prototype and further product development and applications
engineering. Such expenses were $744,000 in 1996 and $1,254,000 in 1995.
In addition to the engineering and product development expenditures, this
segment is increasing expenditures for selling, general and administrative
expenses in order to achieve initial market penetration. Such expenditures were
$1,069,000 and were 40% higher in 1996 compared to $765,000 expended in 1995.
CORPORATE MATTERS
Total revenues were $12,939,000 in 1996, a decrease of $1,254,000 or 9%
from the $14,193,000 in 1995. The net loss of $1,334,000 or $0.37 per share for
1996 is comprised of several items. There was the gain on settlement of lawsuit
(approximately $2,241,000, or $0.62 per share). This gain triggered a payment to
the former landlord and expense of $250,000 ($0.07 per share). Excluding these
items, results from total operations would have produced a net loss of
$3,325,000 or $0.92 per share in 1996 compared with a net loss of $1,143,000 or
$0.39 per share in 1995. The income (loss) per share results are computed on
weighted average shares outstanding of 3,617,000 in 1996 compared to 2,913,000
in 1995.
The Company and a corporate defendant reached an out-of-court settlement in
1996. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company recognized a gain
of approximately $2.2 million after payment of contingent attorney's fees of
$1,525,000 and related expenses of $235,000. The Company had expensed in prior
years approximately $385,000 in connection with this lawsuit. In addition, the
Company recognized an expense of $250,000 as part of the previously concluded
rent dispute with its former landlord. The Company was liable for such a payment
upon successful conclusion of the lawsuit.
In 1996, the Company's interest costs increased due to the issuance of $1.4
million of 10% convertible debentures. Total interest costs were $143,000 in
1996 compared to $63,000 in 1995.
The Company recognized the majority of its remaining tax benefit amount
recoverable from the carryback of net operating losses prior to 1994. The
Company is in a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward position for book and
income tax purposes. No significant benefit from income taxes for realization of
carryback or carryforward losses was recognized in 1996 or 1995.
17
<PAGE>
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company evaluates its liquidity position using various factors. The
following represents some of the more important factors.
<TABLE>
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ($ Thousands)
<CAPTION>
AS OF
December 29, December 31,
1996 1995
--------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Total Assets $ 5,940 $ 6,351
Working Capital $ 100 $ 327
Current Ratio 1.03:1 1.09:1
Current and Long-Term Debt $ 233 $ 313
Current and Long-Term Capital Leases 241 291
Bank Line of Credit 900 917
10% Convertible Debentures Due 2000 1,400 535
--------------- ---------------
Total Debt/Financing $ 2,774 $ 2,056
=============== ===============
Stockholders' Equity $ 729 $ 1,960
=============== ===============
</TABLE>
At yearend 1996, the Company has a decline in its working capital and its
current ratio due primarily to deferred revenues and loss reserves resulting
from certain loss contracts in 1996. The stockholders' equity increased by
approximately $100,000 from the proceeds from the exercise of stock options but
decreased by approximately $1.3 million from the 1996 net loss.
The net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $200,000.
This net increase primarily resulted from the collections of accounts
receivables of $1.1 million offset by approximately $.7 million of cash used for
inventory and payment of current liabilities.
The Company has incurred losses over the past three years, primarily due to
the development and marketing of its optoelectronics products and services. The
Company has also experienced difficulty in sustaining and expanding revenue
volume in certain areas of the Technical Services and Products business segment.
The Optoelectronics Products and Services business segment is currently
experiencing net cash expenditures (including all general and administrative
expenses) over receipts of approximately $200,000 per month. If current
conditions remain unchanged, the Company would not be able to sustain its
optoelectronics business without additional working capital.
Some of the alternatives the Company is considering to address the working
capital shortfall are asset sales as well as seeking additional funds from
public or private financing markets. The Company may sell certain operations or
other assets which are underutilized or deemed not to be a part of its ongoing
operations. The Company has placed its Huntsville, Alabama facility for sale.
However, the proceeds from the sale of the Huntsville facility would be
restricted as to the use of the funds as the facility currently serves as a
portion of the collateral on the convertible debentures. There are no definitive
arrangements for any such asset sales at this time.
18
<PAGE>
The Company is seeking additional funds from public or private financing
markets to finance operations and to achieve desired product inventory levels
and initial market penetration. The Company is also seeking to establish joint
ventures or strategic partnerships with major industrial concerns to facilitate
these goals. The Company believes that it will be able to meet its 1997 funding
requirements from the aforementioned sources, although there can be no
assurances in this regard as it has no commitments for any such funding. Failure
to commercialize or significant delays in the commercialization of the Company's
optoelectronic products would have a significant adverse effect on the Company's
future operating results and future financial position; however, the Company
believes that in such event it will successfully manage and reduce cash
requirements for operations by curtailing expenditures in optoelectronics
operations (including general and administrative expenses), although there can
be no assurances in this regard.
In the opinion of management, if the Company successfully reduces the cash
requirements of the optoelectronics segment, the cash flow from its existing
technical support contracts and the availability of accounts receivable
financing would enable it to continue operations through 1997. The current
receivable financing arrangement is in place through May 31, 1997. While the
Company believes the financing arrangement should be renewed, terms and
conditions of succeeding agreements may change. If the current arrangement is
not renewed, the Company will obtain financing from other sources. In the event
working capital alternatives are not available, the Company will reduce funding
its optoelectronics segment sufficient enough to ensure that it will continue to
operate through 1997.
The preceding paragraphs contain forward-looking statements and the factors
affecting the ability of the Company to meet its funding requirements and manage
its cash resources include, among other things, the magnitude and timing of
product sales and the magnitude of fixed costs.
Under the settlement agreement reached with the landlord, certain payments
are triggered only by other future cash inflows. The remaining $308,000
contingent portion of the landlord settlement obligation (which has been accrued
and expensed in prior years), is not payable until future earnings (as defined),
operating asset sales or equity capital funding occur. When such future events
transpire, only a portion of the cash flows or proceeds generated are payable.
The Company has an accounts receivable financing arrangement with a local
bank. The current loan arrangement provides for a line of credit up to
$1,500,000 for financing at the bank's prime rate plus 1.5%. The Company can
utilize certain accounts receivable and obtain a percentage advance as a loan
under the financing arrangement. At December 29, 1996, the funds advanced were
$900,000. (The maximum borrowings available based upon the level of accounts
receivable was $1,308,000.) The $900,000 of actual borrowings were repaid
immediately after yearend and reduced the Company's cash balance from $1,508,000
to approximately $600,000. The current arrangement extends through May 31, 1997.
The Company intends to renew this arrangement upon expiration, although there
can be no assurances that this will occur or that it will occur on similar terms
and conditions.
The line of credit is secured by all accounts receivables and certain
general intangibles (excluding patents). The Company is subject to certain
restrictions, such as acquisitions of or mergers with other entities; and
creation or incurrence of new debt. Such restrictions have been waived by the
Bank in connection with the issuance of the Company's convertible debentures.
19
<PAGE>
INFLATION
The Company, because of its substantial activities in professional services
and product development, is more labor intensive than firms involved primarily
in industrial activities. To attract and maintain higher caliber professional
staff, the Company must structure its compensation programs competitively. The
wage demand effect of inflation is felt almost immediately in its costs;
however, the net effect during the years in question is minimal.
The inflation rate in the United States generally has little impact on the
Company's cost- reimbursable type contracts and other short-term contracts. For
longer-term, fixed-price type contracts, the Company endeavors to protect its
margins by including cost escalation provisions or other specific inflation
protective terms in its contracts.
7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See Item 13(a)(1) in Part III of this Form 10-KSB.
8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
<PAGE>
PART III
9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS
The Directors* and executive officers elected by the Board are:
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
Harry Letaw, Jr. 70 Chairman; Director; Chief Executive Officer
and President
Terry M. Turpin ** 54 Senior Vice President; Chief Technical
Officer and Director
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. 46 Vice President; Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
Anthony L. Ward 57 Vice President; Chief Administrative Officer
and Assistant Secretary
Leonard E. Moodispaw 54 Secretary and Corporate Counsel
Martin G. Every 57 Vice President
Matthew S. Bechta 43 Vice President
Robert S. Kennedy 61 Vice President
Craig H. Price 47 Vice President
Frank E. Manning 77 Chairman Emeritus; Director
Harold P. Hanson 75 Director (3)
Robert W. Hicks 59 Director (1)
Samuel Hopkins 83 Director (2)
Ray M. Keeler 65 Director (2)
A. William Perkins 71 Director (1)(3)
E. Ted Prince 49 Director
* Directors are elected annually at the Company's Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
** Mr. Turpin was elected by the Board of Directors in January 1997.
(1) Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
(3) Member of the Ethics Committee of the Board of Directors.
Harry Letaw, Jr. was elected a Director of the Company in June 1988. He is
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Previously, he was
a Director of the Company and a member of the Executive Committee of its Board
from July 1981 to September 1983. Dr. Letaw is President and founder of Severn
Communications Corporation, a technical software firm, and President and founder
of Intellinet Corporation, a motor control system manufacturer, both based in
Maryland. In addition Dr. Letaw served in senior management and marketing
positions with Raytheon, Bunker-Ramo and Martin-Marietta. He performed military
service during World War II. Dr. Letaw received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Chemistry in 1949, a Master of Science degree in Chemistry in 1951 and a Doctor
of Philosophy degree in Physical Chemistry in 1952, all from the University of
Florida. Dr. Letaw has an employment contract with the Company extending
month-to-month by mutual agreement. Dr.
21
<PAGE>
Letaw devotes his full business time to the business of the Company and his
affiliations with other corporations do not involve any substantial expenditures
of time nor do these positions involve any real or potential conflicts of
interest.
Terry M. Turpin was elected a Director of the Company in January 1997. He
is a Senior Vice President and the Chief Technical Officer for the Company. He
was Vice President and Chief Scientist of the Essex subsidiary, System
Engineering and Development Corporation (SEDC) from September 1984 through June
1989. From December 1983 to September 1984 he was an independent consultant.
From 1963 through December 1983, Mr. Turpin was employed by NSA. For the last
ten years of this period, he was Chief of the Advanced Processing Technologies
Division. He holds patents for optical computers and adaptive optical
components. Mr. Turpin represented NSA on the Tri-Service Optical Processing
Committee organized by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering
from the University of Akron in June 1966 and a Master of Science in Electrical
Engineering from Catholic University in Washington, D.C.
in June 1970.
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. joined Essex Corporation in March 1985 as Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer and was appointed Vice President in May 1987. He was
controller of ManTech International Corporation from December 1979 to March
1985. Mr. Kurry received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration
in 1972 from Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. and is a Certified Public
Accountant.
Anthony L. Ward joined Essex in February 1991. He is currently Vice
President, Chief Administrative Officer, Director of Corporate Development and
Assistant Secretary. Additionally, Mr. Ward is the General Manager of the
Federal Systems Division. Prior to employment with the Company, Mr. Ward served
as Vice President of C3 Operations in the ARC Professional Services Group, a
position he held since 1987. He was with ARC (or ARC subsidiaries) for a total
of 13 years with varied roles in engineering, advanced programs and management
oriented to the DoD C3I arena. From 1972 - 1977 he was with Litton Data Systems
and held software engineering and management positions on key U.S. Navy and U.S.
Army programs. Mr. Ward served honorably in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1958 -
1971. Mr. Ward holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from
Chapman College in Orange, California and has completed all course work for a
Masters of Science in Financial Systems Management.
Leonard E. Moodispaw was an active partner in the law firm of Dalnekoff &
Mason from February 1993 through September 1993 and was a partner in the law
firm of Blumenthal, Wayson, Downs and Offutt from 1978 to 1988, both firms are
located in Annapolis, Maryland and specialize in litigation. From September 1993
to April 1994, Mr. Moodispaw served as Executive Vice President of ManTech
International Corporation, a privately held company. Since April 1994, he has
served as President of ManTech Advanced Systems International Corporation. He
was a Director of SEDC from its inception in 1980 until it was acquired by Essex
in 1989. In 1988, he joined SEDC as Vice President and Corporate Counsel. From
June 1989 until September 1991, he served as Vice President, Corporate Counsel
and Chief Administrative Officer of Essex and from July 1989 has served as
Secretary to the Board of Directors. Mr. Moodispaw also serves as Director of
the MVM Group, Inc., a small consulting firm in Maryland since 1991 and as
Founder and General Counsel of the Security Affairs
22
<PAGE>
Support Association, a not-for-profit organization since 1990. From September
1991 to February 1993 Mr. Moodispaw was Director of International Business with
GTE Government Systems. Mr. Moodispaw received a Bachelor's degree in Business
Administration from American University in 1965, a Masters Degree in Business
Administration in 1969 and a Juris Doctor degree in 1977 from the University of
Baltimore. Mr. Moodispaw spends less than 5% of his business time in his
capacities with the Company, and his affiliations with other corporations do not
involve any real or potential conflicts of interest.
Martin G. Every joined the Company in October 1983. He was subsequently
promoted to the position of Director, Security/Special Military Operations Group
of the Company and elected Senior Vice President of the Company in December
1986. Mr. Every has served as General Manager of the Company's Systems
Effectiveness Division since mid 1990. In 1992 Mr. Every was named to the Board
of Directors of James Madison University (JMU) Research and Development Center,
Inc. and is the Essex manager for the Center for Crisis Prevention, an
Academic-Industrial Coventure between JMU and Essex. Previously, Mr. Every was
with BioTechnology, Inc. From 1961-1966, he served with the U.S. Navy, first as
an operations officer aboard an ocean minesweeper and later as a member of a
Navy Special Warfare Team. Mr. Every received a Bachelor of Science degree in
Biochemistry from Notre Dame in 1961 and a Master of Science degree in
Oceanography from Texas A & M University in 1968.
Matthew S. Bechta was elected Vice President in October 1993. As the
Director of the Columbia Operations within the Federal Systems Division, Mr.
Bechta is responsible for technical operations and business development for
programs for Satellite Communications Engineering and Optoelectronic Signal
Processing. Mr. Bechta joined Essex in 1989 with the merger of Essex and SEDC.
As one of the founders of SEDC, he served in various technical and management
capacities since incorporation in 1980. From 1975-1980 Mr. Bechta worked at the
National Security Agency (NSA) as a systems engineer on several collection,
signal processing and communications projects. Mr. Bechta holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Spring Garden College,
Pennsylvania and a Master of Science degree in Computer Science from the Johns
Hopkins University.
Robert S. Kennedy has been a Vice President of the Company since August
1987. Dr. Kennedy joined the Company in January 1981 and has served as principal
investigator for over twenty five scientific studies in human factors
engineering, human performance measurement, and simulation and training. He was
an aviation research psychologist in the U.S. Navy from 1959 to 1981. Dr.
Kennedy received a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and Philosophy from Iona
College in 1957, a Master of Arts degree in Experimental Psychology from Fordham
University in 1959, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Experimental Psychology from
the University of Rochester in 1972.
Craig H. Price was elected Vice President in October, 1993. As the Director
of Engineering for the Commercial Products Division, Dr. Price is responsible
for all products, development and research within the Division. Dr. Price joined
Essex in 1989 as a result of the merger of Essex and SEDC. Dr. Price had joined
SEDC in 1985, with varied assignments in engineering, analysis and advanced
technologies. Previously, he served in numerous technical and project positions
in the U.S. Air Force during the period 1974 - 1985, during which he was awarded
the Distinguished Service Medal. Dr. Price holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University, a Master of Science degree
in Electrical Engineering
23
<PAGE>
from Purdue University and a Doctor of Philosophy degree also in Electrical
Engineering, from Stanford University.
Frank E. Manning, Chairman Emeritus, is the founder of the Company. Mr.
Manning has served as a Director of the Company since its organization in 1969.
Mr. Manning received a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from Franklin and
Marshall College in 1942, and a Masters of Letters degree in Industrial
Relations from the University of Pittsburgh in 1946.
Harold P. Hanson, formerly executive director of the Committee on Science,
Space and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1980-1982 and
1984-1990, was elected a Director of the Company in June 1990. Dr. Hanson is now
adjunct professor of physics, University of Florida, Gainesville and the editor
and publisher of DELOS, a non-profit journal of translation. He is a member of
the Essex Scientific Advisory Board, and a Fellow of the American Physical
Society and a National Science Foundation Franklin medalist. Dr. Hanson was
previously provost of Wayne State University and Boston University. He was an
executive vice president, vice president for academic affairs, dean of the
Graduate School and professor of physics of the University of Florida,
Gainesville. He was also chairman of the Department of Physics and director,
Center for Structural Studies, University of Texas, Austin. A naval officer
during World War II, Dr. Hanson served as research physicist at the Naval
Ordnance Laboratory and was later a Fulbright research fellow in 1961-1962. Dr.
Hanson earned graduate degrees at the University of Wisconsin.
Robert W. Hicks was elected a Director of the Company in August 1988. He
has been an independent consultant since 1986. During this period he was engaged
for three and one-half years by the State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund
Corporation, Receiver of several savings and loan associations, first as an
Agent and then as a Special Representative (both court-approved positions). He
also engages in consulting in the commercial sector. He is a principal officer
and stockholder in Asset Management & Recovery, Inc., a consulting firm which
has primarily provided services, directly and as a subcontractor, to the
Resolution Trust Corporation and law firms engaged by the Resolution Trust
Corporation. Mr. Hicks is also a Director and Secretary of the Kirby
Lithographic Company, Inc.
Samuel Hopkins was elected a Director of the Company in August 1988. From
January 1970 until retirement in October 1987 he was a partner of Alex. Brown &
Sons (investment bankers) in Baltimore, Maryland. Since 1976, Mr. Hopkins has
been a Director of American Maritime Cases, Inc. (legal publisher) in Baltimore,
Maryland. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Economics from
Johns Hopkins University in 1934 and a Juris Doctor degree from the University
of Maryland in 1938. Mr. Hopkins is a Chartered Financial Analyst.
Ray M. Keeler was elected a Director of the Company in July 1989. Since
1986, he has been an independent consultant to both industry and government
organizations in areas related to national and tactical intelligence programs.
Mr. Keeler served on the Board of Directors of SEDC from December 1987 through
April 1989. From 1988 to November 1995, he was President of CRYTEC, Inc., a
service company providing management, business development and technical support
to companies involved in classified cryptologic projects. Since December 1995,
he has been a consultant to companies involved in national technical
intelligence programs.
24
<PAGE>
From 1982 to 1986, Mr. Keeler was Director of Program and Budget for the NSA. He
received a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in
1957.
A. William Perkins has been a Director of the Company since its
organization in 1969. He is President of Perkins Warehouse Company, of
Alexandria, Virginia. He is retired from 23 years in the printing industry,
having served as President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Old
Dominion Printing Co. Mr. Perkins served in the U.S. Navy during World War II
and the Korean Conflict.
E. Ted Prince was elected a Director of the Company in November 1996. In
June 1995 he was appointed president and Chief Executive officer of INSCI
Corporation, a publicly traded software company in optical data storage area. He
was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in August 1995 and appointed
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer in May 1996 for INSCI Corporation. Dr.
Prince has been president of several software companies and is also President of
Perth Ventures, Inc., a New York City based investment banking firm specializing
in the emerging technology sector. Dr. Prince is an author and publisher of an
industry newsletter, THE TECHNOLOGY FUNDAMENTALIST. He also serves as director
for several software companies and has a degree in Political Science from the
University of New South Wales (Australia) and a Master of Science and a Doctor
of Philosophy degrees from Monash University (Australia).
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act") requires the Company's officers and directors, and persons who
own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity
securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of equity
securities of the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Officers, directors, and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by
SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
that they file.
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and Forms 4 furnished to the Company
pursuant to Rule 16(a)-3 under the Exchange Act during its most recent fiscal
year and Forms 5 with respect to its most recent fiscal year, the Company
believes that all such forms required to be filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act were timely filed, as necessary, by the officers, directors,
and security holders required to file the same during the fiscal year ended
December 29, 1996.
25
<PAGE>
10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the aggregate cash compensation paid for
services rendered to the Company during the last three fiscal years by the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's four other most highly
compensated executive officers who served as such at the end of the last fiscal
year and whose total compensation exceeds $100,000.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
--------------------------------------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS
------------------------------------------ -------------------------- ----------
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Restricted Securities All Other
Annual Stock Underlying LTIP Compen-
Name and Compensation Award(s) Options/SARs Payouts sation
Principal Position Year Salary($)(1) Bonus ($) ($)(2) ($)(3) (#) (#) ($)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Harry Letaw, Jr. 1996 135,200 35,000 0 0 0 0 0
Chairman and CEO 1995 113,920 10,000 0 0 0 0 0
1994 107,536 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anthony L. Ward 1996 116,480 15,000 3,494 0 30,000 0 0
Vice President, Assistant 1995 107,680 7,500 3,235 0 8,000 0 0
Secretary and CAO 1994 105,040 0 3,151 0 0 0 0
Terry M. Turpin 1996 115,120 15,000 3,465 0 8,000 0 0
Senior Vice President and 1995 102,848 7,500 3,095 0 8,000 0 0
Director 1994 100,006 0 3,009 0 17,778 0 0
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. 1996 114,400 25,000 3,439 0 23,500 0 0
Treasurer, Vice President 1995 106,400 7,500 3,198 0 5,000 0 0
and CFO 1994 104,000 0 3,123 0 20,000 0 0
Martin G. Every 1996 110,240 25,000 3,324 0 29,500 0 0
Senior Vice President 1995 102,640 5,000 3,094 0 5,000 0 0
1994 100,360 0 3,025 0 0 0 0
- ------------------------------------
<FN>
(1) Includes amounts deferred at the election of the named executive
officer pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code ("401(k)").
(2) Represents matching 401(k) contributions made on behalf of the respective
named executive officer pursuant to the Company's Retirement Plan and
Trust. Excludes other perquisites and benefits not exceeding the lesser of
$50,000 or 10% of the named executive officer's total annual salary and
bonus.
(3) No restricted stock awards were made for the periods indicated. The number
and value of the aggregate restricted stock holdings for the named
executive officers at the end of the 1996 fiscal year, based on the closing
bid price of the Common Stock on NASDAQ on December 27, 1996, without
giving effect to the consideration paid by the named executive officer,
were as follows: Dr. Letaw, 222,905 shares, $236,279 value; Mr. Ward,
20,831 shares, $22,081 value; Mr. Kurry, 36,359 shares, $38,541 value; Mr.
Turpin, 75,781 shares, $80,328 value; and Mr. Every, 6,037 shares, $6,399
value.
</FN>
</TABLE>
26
<PAGE>
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company has a qualified defined contribution retirement plan, the Essex
Corporation Retirement Plan and Trust, which includes a 401(k) salary reduction
feature for its employees. The Plan calls for a discretionary contribution as
determined by the Board of Directors, and an employer matching contribution of
up to 3% of eligible employee compensation under the salary reduction feature.
Discretionary contributions are determined annually by the Board of Directors.
No discretionary contribution was made by the Company to the Retirement Plan for
1996. The total authorized contribution under the matching contribution feature
of the Plan was approximately $162,700 in 1996. All employee contributions are
100% vested at all times and Company contributions vest based on length of
service. Vested contributions are distributable and benefits are payable only
upon death, disability, retirement or break in service. Participants may request
that their accrued benefits under the Section 401(k) portion of the Plan be
allocated among various investment options established by the Plan
administrator.
The Company contributions under the Retirement Plan for the persons referred
to in the Summary Compensation Table are included in that Table.
EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE AWARD PLAN
The Company has an Employee Incentive Performance Award Plan under which
bonuses are distributed to employees. All employees are eligible to receive such
awards under flexible criteria designed to compensate for superior division and
individual performance during each fiscal year. Awards are generally recommended
annually by management and approved by the Board of Directors. Such awards may
be constrained by overall Company performances. There were 35 awards in 1996
totaling $185,250. The incentive awards under the Performance Award Plan for the
persons referred to in the Summary Compensation Table are included in that
Table.
RESTRICTED STOCK BONUS PLAN
Essex Corporation has a Restricted Stock Bonus Plan under which up to 50,000
shares of the Company's common stock may be reserved for issuance to
non-employee members of the Board of Directors and key employees of the Company
selected by the Board of Directors. Shares of restricted stock may be issued
under the Plan subject to forfeiture during a restriction period, fixed in each
instance by the Board of Directors, whereby all rights of the grantee to the
stock terminate upon certain conditions such as cessation of continuous
employment during the restriction period. Upon expiration of the restriction
period, or earlier upon the death or substantial disability of the grantee, the
restrictions applicable to all shares of restricted stock of the grantee expire.
The Plan also provides that loans may be advanced by the Company to a grantee to
pay income taxes due on the taxable value of shares granted under the Plan. Such
loans must be evidenced by an interest bearing promissory note payable five (5)
years after the date of the loan, and be secured by shares of stock of the
Company (which may be restricted stock) having a fair market value equal to 200
percent of the loan.
During 1995, the Board awarded a total of 12,000 shares to six directors and
none were awarded in 1996 or 1994. There are approximately 22,050 shares
remaining in the Essex Corporation Restricted Stock Bonus Plan as of December
29, 1996.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Since 1988, the Company has had an Agreement of Employment with Harry
Letaw, Jr., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Dr.
Letaw's annual
27
<PAGE>
compensation was originally established at $120,000 but was reduced, at his
recommendation to the annual amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
Dr. Letaw's annual compensation was increased to $135,200 effective October 2,
1995. The term of this Agreement is extended on a month-to-month basis by mutual
agreement.
The Company has an Agreement of Employment with Frank E. Manning, Chairman
Emeritus and Member of the Essex Board of Directors, whereby Mr. Manning is a
part-time employee of the Company with duties to provide advice and counsel to
the management of Essex. The Agreement may be terminated by either party with 60
days advance notice. Mr. Manning also receives reimbursement of medical costs
not covered by Medicare. Mr. Manning received compensation of $30,350 in fiscal
year 1996 for his services as an employee of the Company and medical
reimbursement of $2,761 in 1996.
The above agreements restrict the individuals' rights to compete with the
Company and prohibit misappropriation of proprietary rights of the Company, both
during and after the term of employment.
OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SECURITIES
The Company has a 1996 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan (the "1996
Plan"). The 1996 Plan as presently in effect provides for the grant of tax
qualified Incentive Stock Options ("ISOs") and options that are not tax
qualified ("NSOs") and Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") which rights may be
related to, but not necessarily be granted in tandem with, options granted under
the 1996 Plan. Persons eligible to receive awards of options and SARs under the
1996 Plan include officers, directors, key employees and other persons who
provide valuable services to the Company. SARs entitle the holder to cash or
Company Common Stock measured by the increase in market value of the Company's
Common Stock from the date of grant to the date of exercise. The exercise price
of an ISO under the 1996 Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the
Company stock on the date of grant; the exercise price of NSOs and the
appreciation base price of SARs are determined in the discretion of the Board of
Directors except that the SAR appreciation base price may not be less than 50%
of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the grant date with
respect to awards to persons who are officers or directors of the Company. The
1996 Plan reserves 300,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock for issuance.
There are options for 81,000 shares outstanding at prices ranging from $2.30 -
$3.00, including options for 34,000 shares held by officers or directors (none
of which are exercisable at this time). As of February 28, 1997, there remain
219,000 shares available for future grants of options or SARs.
The Company had an Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan ("OSAR Plan")
which expired on January 31, 1997 with no shares available for future grants. As
of February 28, 1997, options for 819,750 shares of the Company's Common Stock
remain outstanding under this Plan. Of this amount, options for 529,724 shares
are exercisable at prices ranging from $2.50 - $3.50 including options held by
officers and directors to purchase 674,000 shares (of which options for 452,274
shares are exercisable).
28
<PAGE>
The following Table shows for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996 for
the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table, information with respect to
options to purchase Common Stock granted during 1996 under the OSAR Plan. A
total of 27,500 shares of options granted under the stock plans have been
exercised by the persons listed below in 1996.
<TABLE>
STOCK OPTIONS GRANTS TABLE
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Number of
Securities
Underlying % Of Total Options/
Options SARs Granted to Exercise or
Granted Employees in Base Price Expiration
NAME (#)(1) Fiscal Year ($/Sh) Date
================================================================================================
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Harry Letaw, Jr. --- --- --- ---
Anthony L. Ward 10,000 3.9 3.00 12/31/02
10,000 3.9 3.00 12/31/03
10,000 3.9 3.00 12/31/04
Terry M. Turpin 4,000 1.5 3.00 12/31/02
4,000 1.5 3.00 12/31/03
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. 8,000 3.1 3.00 12/31/02
8,000 3.1 3.00 12/31/03
7,500 2.9 3.00 12/31/04
Martin G. Every 10,000 3.9 3.00 12/31/02
10,000 3.9 3.00 12/31/03
9,500 3.7 3.00 12/31/04
- ------------------------------------
<FN>
(1) Such options become exercisable beginning March 15, 1997.
</FN>
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE>
The following Table shows for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996 for
the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table, information with respect to
option/SAR exercises and fiscal year-end values for unexercised options/SARs.
<TABLE>
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES AND FY-END OPTION/SAR VALUES TABLE
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
Number of
Securities Value of
Underlying Unexercised
Unexercised In-the-Money
Options/SARs at Options/SARs at
FY-End (#) FY-End($)
Shares Value
Acquired on Realized Exercisable/ Exercisable/
NAME Exercise (#) ($) Unexercisable Unexercisable
========================================================================================
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Harry Letaw, Jr. 10,000 $1,900 262,104/27,896 0/0
Anthony L. Ward 3,500 2,135 4,700/35,300 0/0
Terry M. Turpin 3,000 1,830 22,478/13,300 0/0
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. 6,000 3,660 23,700/26,800 0/0
Martin G. Every 5,000 3,050 3,700/32,800 0/0
</TABLE>
REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS
The Company's Directors generally meet quarterly. Additionally, the By-Laws
provide for special meetings and, as also permitted by Virginia law, Board
action may be taken without a meeting upon unanimous written consent of all
Directors. Board members not employed by the Company receive a maximum of $1,500
for each Board or Board Committee Meeting attended. In 1996 the Board held five
meetings; the entire membership of the Board was present at all of the meetings.
30
<PAGE>
11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table and accompanying notes set forth as of February 28,
1997, information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's
Common Stock by (i) each person or group who beneficially own more than 5% of
the Common Stock, (ii) each of the directors of the Company, (iii) each of the
officers of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all
directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount and Nature Percentage of Outstanding
Name and Address of Beneficial Shares of Common Stock
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER* OWNERSHIP (1) BENEFICIALLY OWNED
----------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Harry Letaw, Jr. (2) 516,877 9.20
Kennedy Capital Management (3) 341,857 6.09
Frank E. Manning (4) 123,275 2.19
Terry M. Turpin (5) 86,981 1.55
Samuel Hopkins (6) 52,875 **
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. (7) 49,609 **
Robert W. Hicks (8) 49,200 **
Harold P. Hanson (9) 39,500 **
Anthony L. Ward (10) 37,031 **
A. William Perkins (11) 24,500 **
Ray M. Keeler (12) 24,250 **
Martin G. Every (13) 19,737 **
E. Ted Prince (14) 5,000 **
All Directors and Executive Officers
as a Group (16 persons) (15) 1,373,184 24.45
- ------------------------------------
<FN>
* All beneficial owners are directors and/or officers of the Company and
can be reached c/o Essex Corporation, 9150 Guilford Road, Columbia, MD
21046.
** Less than 1%
(1) Under the rules of the Commission, a person is deemed to be a
"beneficial owner" of a security if that person has or shares the power
to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to
dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also
deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person
has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within sixty (60) days.
Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a
beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to
be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no record
ownership interest. The shares listed above include options and rights
to acquire shares within sixty (60) days and shares held of record by
the Essex Corporation Retirement Trust as to which shares the
respective participant has disposition and voting rights. The
percentage ownership is computed based upon the number of shares which
would be outstanding if such options and rights were exercised.
(2) Dr. Harry Letaw, Jr. is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company. Of the 516,877 shares beneficially
shown as owned by Dr. Letaw, 293,354 shares represent presently
exercisable rights to acquire Common Stock through stock options and
warrants.
(3) Based upon representations made in a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about February 25, 1997,
Kennedy Capital Management, Inc. is an investment adviser registered
under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 which has sole
power to vote or direct the vote and sole dispositive power as to
341,857 shares, including 215,857 shares which it has the right to
acquire.
(4) Mr. Frank E. Manning is the record and beneficial owner of
approximately 2.19% of the outstanding shares of the Company (123,275
shares), including presently exercisable options to purchase 28,500
shares. Mr. Manning is the Chairman Emeritus and a Director of the
Company. Does not include 40,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock
31
<PAGE>
ownedof record and beneficially by Mrs. Eva L. Manning, wife of Mr.
Frank E. Manning. Also does not include 157,500 shares beneficially
owned by six separate family trusts of which Mrs. Manning is the sole
trustee and over which trusts she has exclusive voting and dispositive
power.
(5) Terry M. Turpin is a Director and Senior Vice President of the Company.
Of the shares shown as beneficially owned, 11,200 represent presently
exercisable rights to acquire common stock through stock options and
warrants.
(6) Samuel Hopkins is a Director of the Company. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, 19,125 represent presently exercisable rights to
acquire common stock through stock options and warrants.
(7) Joseph R. Kurry, Jr. is Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company. Of the shares shown as beneficially owned,
13,250 represent presently exercisable rights to acquire common stock
through stock options and warrants.
(8) Robert W. Hicks is a Director of the Company. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, 16,000 represent presently exercisable rights to
acquire common stock through stock options and warrants.
(9) Harold P. Hanson is a Director of the Company. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, 16,500 represent presently exercisable rights to
acquire common stock through stock options and warrants.
(10)Anthony L. Ward is Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and
Assistant Secretary of the Company. Of the shares shown as beneficially
owned, 19,700 represent presently exercisable rights to acquire common
stock through stock options and warrants.
(11)A. William Perkins is a Director of the Company. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, 13,500 represent presently exercisable rights to
acquire common stock through stock options and warrants.
(12)Ray M. Keeler is a Director of the Company. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, 14,250 represent presently exercisable rights to
acquire common stock through stock options and warrants.
(13)Martin G. Every is a Senior Vice President of the Company. Of the
shares shown as beneficially owned, 13,700 represent presently
exercisable rights to acquire common stock through stock options.
(14)E. Ted Prince is a Director of the Company. Of the shares shown as
beneficially owned, 5,000 represent presently exercisable rights to
acquire common stock through stock options.
(15)Of the shares shown as beneficially owned, 523,024 represent presently
exercisable rights to acquire common stock through stock options and
warrants.
</FN>
</TABLE>
12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None.
32
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
<S> <C>
(a) (1) Financial Statements
Report of Independent Public Accountants 35
Balance Sheet 36
Statements of Operations 37
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity 38
Statements of Cash Flows 39
Notes to Financial Statements 40 - 54
(2) Exhibits
(i) Exhibit 3(i) - Articles of Incorporation and Amendments thereto B
Exhibit 3(ii) -By-Laws, as amended
Filed as Exhibits 3(i) and 3(ii) to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed October 17, 1994,
Registration No. 33-82920
(ii) Exhibit 4 - Instruments defining the Rights of Holders
4.1 Form of Warrant Agreement with Mellon Bank C
4.2 Specimen of Warrant Certificate C
4.3 Specimen of Common Stock Certificate C
4.4 Warrant Agreement with J. Michael Reisert, Inc. D
4.5 Specimen of Placement Agent's Warrant Certificate D
4.6 Form of 10% Convertible Collateralized Debenture
4.7 Form of Series B Warrant E
(iii) Exhibit 10 - Material Contracts
10.1 Employment Agreement dated April 8, 1988, between C
Dr. Harry Letaw, Jr. and Registrant
10.3 Restricted Stock Bonus Plan C
10.4 Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan C
10.5 Incentive Stock Option Plan C
10.6 Pension Plan and Trust Agreement C
10.7 Defined Contribution Retirement Plan C
10.8 Incentive Performance Award Plan C
10.9 Line of Credit Agreement with Signet Bank E
10.10 Settlement Agreement between the Company and Rumsey Associates C
Limited Partnership
10.11 Option Agreement between the Company and Rumsey Associates C
Limited Partnership
10.13 Registration Rights Agreement C
10.14 Contract between the U.S. Department of Energy and the Company C
10.15 1996 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan F
(iv) Exhibit 23 - Consents of Experts and Counsel
23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants 55
(v) Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule
27.1 Financial Data Schedule A
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
In November 1996, the Company reported results of its 1996 Annual
Meeting. No financial statements were included.
- -----------------------
<FN>
A Filed herewith
B Incorporated by reference as indicated
C Filed as Exhibit to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed October 17, 1994, Registration No. 33-82920
D Filed as Exhibit to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed February 17, 1995, Registration No. 33-82920
E Filed as Exhibit to Registrant's 1995 Form 10-KSB
F Filed as Exhibit to Registrant's Form 8-K dated November 13, 1996
</FN>
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
ESSEX CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Harry Letaw, Jr.
By: ------------------------------------------------------
Harry Letaw, Jr.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President;
Principal Executive Officer
March 26, 1997
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr.
By: ------------------------------------------------------
Joseph R. Kurry, Jr.
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer;
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
March 26, 1997
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
Harold P. Hanson Frank E. Manning
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Harold P. Hanson, Director Frank E. Manning, Director
March 26, 1997 March 26, 1997
Robert W. Hicks A. William Perkins
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Robert W. Hicks, Director A. William Perkins, Director
March 26, 1997 March 26, 1997
Samuel Hopkins E. Ted Prince
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Samuel Hopkins, Director E. Ted Prince, Director
March 26, 1997 March 26, 1997
Ray M. Keeler Terry M. Turpin
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Ray M. Keeler, Director Terry M. Turpin, Director
March 26, 1997 March 26, 1997
Harry Letaw, Jr.
-----------------------------------
Harry Letaw, Jr., Director
March 26, 1997
34
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Essex Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Essex Corporation as of
December 29, 1996, and the related statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 29, 1996 and
December 31, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Essex Corporation as of
December 29, 1996 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years ended December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Washington, D.C.,
March 21, 1997
35
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 29, 1996
<CAPTION>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
<S> <C>
Cash $ 1,507,603
Accounts receivable, net 1,482,118
Inventory 482,317
Prepayments and other 156,041
--------------
3,628,079
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Production and special equipment 1,596,491
Furniture, equipment and other 1,533,467
3,129,958
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (2,501,651)
628,307
OTHER ASSETS
Assets held for sale, net 1,205,409
Patents, net 169,657
Goodwill, net 144,486
Deferred debenture financing 104,880
Other 58,696
--------------
1,683,128
TOTAL ASSETS $ 5,939,514
- ------------ ==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current portion of Industrial Revenue Bond $ 80,001
Current portion of capital leases 111,895
Bank line of credit 900,000
Accounts payable 506,999
Accrued wages and vacation 350,099
Deferred revenues and loss reserves 640,000
Accrued lease settlement 308,237
Other accrued expenses 631,045
--------------
3,528,276
LONG-TERM DEBT
Industrial Revenue Bond, net of current portion 153,319
10% Collateralized Convertible Debentures Due 2000 1,400,000
Capital Leases, net of current portion 128,850
--------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 5,210,445
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 6)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock $0.10 par value; 25 million shares
authorized; 3,625,098 shares issued and outstanding 362,510
Contributions in excess of par 5,313,888
Retained deficit (4,947,329)
--------------
729,069
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 5,939,514
- ------------------------------------------ ==============
<FN>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
</FN>
</TABLE>
36
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE 52-WEEK FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND
THE 53-WEEK FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------------ ------------------
Technical Services and Products:
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 11,535,368 $ 13,206,167
Direct costs (8,173,064) (8,620,664)
Indirect costs (3,983,429) (3,819,735)
------------------ ------------------
Operating (Loss) Income - Technical
Services and Products (621,125) 765,768
------------------ ------------------
Optoelectronic Products and Services:
Revenues 1,403,973 986,767
Cost of goods sold and services provided (2,151,194) (820,211)
Engineering and product development expenses (743,662) (1,254,247)
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1,069,235) (765,212)
------------------ ------------------
Operating Loss - Optoelectronics
Products and Services (2,560,118) (1,852,903)
------------------ ------------------
Total Operating Loss (3,181,243) (1,087,135)
Gain on settlement of lawsuit/(expenses),
net of related expenses of $1,759,450 in 1996 2,240,550 (283,997)
Lease settlement (250,000) --
Interest expense (142,991) (63,368)
------------------ ------------------
Loss Before Income Taxes (1,333,684) (1,434,500)
Benefit from income taxes -- 7,046
------------------ ------------------
Net Loss $ (1,333,684) $ (1,427,454)
================== ==================
Weighted Average Number of Shares
Outstanding 3,616,519 2,913,139
================== ==================
Loss Per Share $ (0.37) $ (0.49)
================== ==================
<FN>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
</FN>
</TABLE>
37
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND DECEMBER 31, 1995
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK Contri- Total
------------ butions Stock-
Shares In Excess Retained holders'
ISSUED AMOUNT OF PAR DEFICIT EQUITY
-------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, DECEMBER 25, 1994 1,823,973 $ 182,397 $ 3,332,352 $ (2,186,191) $ 1,328,558
Common stock offering 1,750,000 175,000 1,846,854 -- 2,021,854
Common stock bonus 12,000 1,200 35,760 -- 36,960
Net loss -- -- -- (1,427,454) (1,427,454)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1995 3,585,973 358,597 5,214,966 (3,613,645) 1,959,918
Stock options exercised 39,000 3,900 98,560 -- 102,460
Warrants exercised 125 13 362 -- 375
Net loss -- -- -- (1,333,684) (1,333,684)
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 29, 1996 3,625,098 $ 362,510 $ 5,313,888 $ (4,947,329) $ 729,069
============= ============= ============= ============= ==============
<FN>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
</FN>
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND DECEMBER 31, 1995
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
<S> <C> <C>
Net Loss $ (1,333,684) $ (1,427,454)
Adjustments to reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash
Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities:
Depreciation and amortization 620,838 440,508
Provision for loss reserves 300,000 --
Gain on sale/retirement of fixed assets (23,708) (11,802)
Other 30,000 36,960
Change in Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts receivable 1,142,928 (1,441,510)
Inventory (298,896) (183,421)
Prepayments and other (45,304) (36,716)
Accounts payable (263,615) 18,127
Accrued lease settlement (70,704) (361,059)
Other liabilities 136,438 190,442
-------------- --------------
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities 194,293 (2,775,925)
-------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment (170,801) (300,523)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets 92,498 18,542
-------------- --------------
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities (78,303) (281,981)
-------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Short-term (repayments) borrowings, net (17,010) 917,010
Repayment of long-term debt (80,001) (80,001)
Sale of common stock -- 2,500,000
Stock offering costs -- (286,952)
Proceeds from exercises of stock options and warrants 102,835 --
Issuance of convertible debentures, net of financing costs 756,594 513,530
Payment of capital lease obligations (192,870) (186,416)
-------------- --------------
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities 569,548 3,377,171
-------------- --------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Net Increase 685,538 319,265
Balance - Beginning of year 822,065 502,800
-------------- --------------
Balance - End of year $ 1,507,603 $ 822,065
<FN>
============== ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
</FN>
</TABLE>
39
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND OTHER IMPORTANT FACTORS
These statements cover Essex Corporation (the "Company"). Certain amounts
for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the 1996
presentation.
REPORTING YEAR
The Company is on a 52/53 week fiscal year ending the last Sunday in
December. The year of 1996 was a 52-week fiscal year and 1995 was a
53-week fiscal year.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
IMPORTANT BUSINESS RISK FACTORS
The Company has historically been principally a supplier of technical
services under contracts or subcontracts with departments or agencies of
the U.S. Government, primarily the military services and other departments
and agencies of the Department of Defense.
Beginning in 1989, the Company has expended significant internal funds to
transition into the commercial marketplace, particularly the
productization of its proprietary technologies in optoelectronic
processors, testing and evaluation. The long-term success of the Company
in this area is dependent on its ability to successfully develop and
market products related to its optoelectronic processors. The success of
these efforts is subject to changing technologies, availability of
financing, competition, and ultimately market acceptance.
The Company has incurred losses over the past three years, primarily due
to the development and marketing of its optoelectronics products and
services. The Company has also experienced difficulty in sustaining and
expanding revenue volume in certain areas of the Technical Services and
Products business segment. The Optoelectronics Products and Services
business segment is currently experiencing net cash expenditures
(including all general and administrative expenses) over receipts of
approximately $200,000 per month. If current conditions remain unchanged,
the Company would not be able to sustain its optoelectronics business
without additional working capital.
Some of the alternatives the Company is considering to address the working
capital shortfall are asset sales as well as seeking additional funds from
public or private financing markets. The Company may sell certain
operations or other assets which are underutilized or deemed not to be a
part of its ongoing operations. The Company has placed its Huntsville,
Alabama facility for sale. However, the proceeds from the sale of the
Huntsville facility would be restricted as to the use of the funds as the
facility currently serves as a portion of the collateral on the
convertible debentures. There are no definitive arrangements for any such
asset sales at this time.
40
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company is seeking additional funds from public or private financing
markets to finance operations and to achieve desired product inventory
levels and initial market penetration. The Company is also seeking to
establish joint ventures or strategic partnerships with major industrial
concerns to facilitate these goals. The Company believes that it will be
able to meet its 1997 funding requirements from the aforementioned
sources, although there can be no assurances in this regard. Failure to
commercialize or significant delays in the commercialization of the
Company's optoelectronic products would have a significant adverse effect
on the Company's future operating results and future financial position;
however, the Company believes that in such event it will successfully
manage and reduce cash requirements for operations by curtailing
expenditures in optoelectronics operations (including general and
administrative expenses).
In the opinion of management, if the Company successfully reduces the cash
requirements of the optoelectronics segment, the cash flow from its
existing technical support contracts and the availability of accounts
receivable financing would enable it to continue operations through 1997.
The current receivable financing arrangement is in place through May 31,
1997 (see Note 3). While the Company believes the financing arrangement
should be renewed, terms and conditions of succeeding agreements may
change. If the current arrangement is not renewed, the Company will obtain
financing from other sources. In the event working capital alternatives
are not available, the Company will reduce funding its optoelectronics
segment sufficient enough to ensure that it will continue to operate
through 1997.
CONTRACT ACCOUNTING
Revenues consist of services rendered on fixed-price, time and materials
and cost-plus- fixed-fee contracts. Revenue on fixed-price contracts
(approximately 16% and 19% of total revenues in 1996 and 1995,
respectively) is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method of
accounting based on costs incurred in relation to the total estimated
costs. Revenue on cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts (approximately 63% and 59%
of total revenues in 1996 and 1995, respectively) is recognized to the
extent of costs incurred plus a proportionate amount of fee earned.
Revenue on time and materials contracts (approximately 21% and 22% of
total revenues in 1996 and 1995, respectively) is recognized to the extent
of billable rates multiplied by hours delivered, plus materials expense
incurred. Anticipated losses are recognized as soon as they become known.
In accordance with industry practice, accounts receivable relating to
long-term contracts are classified as current assets, although a portion
of these amounts is not expected to be realized within one year. A
substantial portion of the Company's business is with agencies of the U.S.
Government and such contracts are subject to audit by cognizant government
audit agencies. Furthermore, while such contracts are fully funded by
appropriations, they may be subject to other risks inherent in government
contracts, such as termination for the convenience of the government.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are recorded under the asset and liability method
whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences, measured by
41
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
enacted tax rates, attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and operating loss carryforwards. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
in income in the period the rate change becomes effective. Valuation
allowances are recorded for deferred tax assets when it is more likely
than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized.
INVENTORY
Inventory costs include purchased parts, labor and manufacturing overhead.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined
using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory costs are all
related to the Company's ImSyn(TM) optoelectronic processor for which
initial production began in late 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
------------
<S> <C>
Purchased Parts $ 83,398
Systems in-process 398,919
------------
$ 482,317
</TABLE>
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated
using straight-line methods based on useful lives as follows:
Buildings and improvements Life of lease or 40 years
Production and special equipment 3 to 10 years
Furniture and equipment 3 to 10 years
Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. When assets
are retired or otherwise disposed of, the asset and related allowance for
depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or
loss is reflected in income.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The excess of cost over the fair value of assets acquired (goodwill)
resulting from an acquisition in 1989 is being amortized on a
straight-line basis over 10 years. Such amortization amounted to
$60,000 in 1996 and 1995.
Patent costs include legal and filing fees covering the various patents
which have been issued to the Company. Patent costs are amortized over
their respective lives (15 - 20 years) and amortization was $32,000 in
1996 and $12,000 in 1995.
Deferred debenture financing costs ($104,880 at December 29, 1996) will be
amortized ratably over the remaining 4-year life of the debentures.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles (including goodwill) to be
held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the
42
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
carrying amount should be addressed. Impairment is measured by comparing
the carrying value to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from use of the assets and their eventual disposition.
During late 1996, the Company placed its Huntsville, Alabama facility for
sale. The facility is currently recorded in the accompanying balance sheet
at approximately $1,205,000 and has been separately identified as "Assets
held for sale, net". An impairment charge of approximately $50,000 was
recorded in 1996 related to this facility and is included as an indirect
cost in the Technical Services and Products segment in the accompanying
Statements of Operations.
NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss per share has been calculated by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each of the
years presented. Common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive in both
years.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
------------ -----------
A. Cash paid during the year for-
<S> <C> <C>
Interest $ 109,600 $ 78,000
Income taxes $ 23,500 $ 5,700
</TABLE>
B. In 1995, the Company issued 12,000 shares of common stock with a
market value of $36,960 under its Restricted Stock Bonus Plan.
C. Capital lease obligations of $143,000 (net present value) and
$477,000 (net present value) were incurred during 1996 and 1995,
respectively, when the Company entered into various leases for new
equipment.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 107, "Disclosures
About Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires disclosures of fair
value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized
in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are
based on estimates using present values or other valuation techniques.
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used,
including discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that
regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by
comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be
realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.
The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet approximates the fair
value for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other variable
rate debt (including borrowings under the line of credit agreement).
43
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The carrying amount of the Company's fixed rate convertible debentures
reported in the balance sheet at December 29, 1996 approximates the fair
value of the instrument as the debenture's interest rate is comparable to
other small security issuers and the debentures are collateralized.
2. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
--------------
U.S. Government:
<S> <C>
Amounts billed, excluding retainages $ 1,321,277
Recoverable costs and accrued profits not yet billed,
including retainages 86,661
1,407,938
Commercial and other 310,180
Contract reserves and allowances for doubtful accounts (236,000)
--------------
$ 1,482,118
==============
</TABLE>
U.S. Government receivables arise from U.S. Government prime contracts and
subcontracts. Unbilled receivables represent revenue recognized for work
performed prior to year-end, which had not been billed. The government
unbilled receivables can be invoiced in accordance with funding on
cost-type contracts or upon attaining certain milestones under fixed-price
contracts.
Retainages, of approximately $34,000 at December 29, 1996, will be
collected upon job completion or settlement of audits performed by
cognizant U.S. Government audit agencies. Company cost records have been
audited through 1993. In the year an audit is settled, the difference
between audit adjustments and previously established reserves is reflected
in income. Management anticipates that a substantial portion of the
December 29, 1996 unbilled retainages will not be billed until after 1997.
Contract reserves and allowances for doubtful accounts have been provided
where less than full recovery under the contract is expected.
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FINANCING
In 1996, the Company has a receivables financing arrangement with Signet
Bank. This arrangement is evidenced by a Loan Agreement, $1.5 million
Promissory Note and Commercial Security Agreement ("Agreements"). Under the
Agreements, the Bank will advance funds against certain accounts
receivable. The funds advanced ($900,000 at December 29, 1996 and $917,000
at December 31, 1995) constitute proceeds under the note which bears
interest at an annual rate of prime plus 1.5% (total rate approximately
9.75% at December 29, 1996; previously the annual rate was prime plus 3%
totaling 11.50% at December 31, 1995). The maximum borrowings available
based upon the level of accounts receivable were $1,308,000 and $917,000 at
year-end 1996 and 1995, respectively. The
44
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company must also pay certain administrative and commitment fees which are
expected to be less than $1,000/month. This agreement was revised in June
1996 and extended through May 1997.
This $1.5 million line of credit is secured by all accounts receivables and
certain general intangibles (excluding patents). The Company is subject to
certain restrictions, such as acquisitions or mergers; or creation or
incurrence of new debt. Such restrictions were waived by the Bank in
connection with the issuance of the Company's convertible debentures.
In 1995, the Company had a Purchase and Assignment Agreement ("Agreement")
regarding its accounts receivable with Capitol Resource Funding, Inc.
("Capitol"). Under the Agreement, Capitol would purchase certain of the
Company's accounts receivable. The Company generally received 80% of the
invoice amount at the time of purchase and the balance when the invoice was
paid. The Company was charged an interest fee on the funded amount at an
annualized rate of 20%, payable at the time each invoice was paid.
4. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
A) INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
-------------
<S> <C>
Industrial Development First
Mortgage Revenue Bond $ 233,320
Less: Current portion 80,001
-------------
Long-term debt $ 153,319
=============
</TABLE>
In 1984, in connection with the construction of an office and plant
facility in Huntsville, Alabama, the Company entered into a financing
agreement with the Industrial Development Board ("Board") of the City of
Huntsville and AmSouth Bank, N.A. Under the terms of the agreement, an
Industrial Development First Mortgage Revenue Bond-Series 1984 in the
amount of $1,200,000, with interest at a floating rate of 75% of the
bank's prime rate, was issued by the Board to AmSouth Bank, N.A. and
guaranteed by the Company.
Monthly repayments of principal are approximately $6,667 ($80,001 per
annum) plus interest. The interest rate at December 29, 1996 was 6.2%.
After the Revenue Bond is fully repaid in the year 1999, the Company is
obligated to pay an additional $18,000 and take legal title to the
facility. Accordingly, the Company has capitalized the assets related to
this agreement. (See Note 6).
45
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future payments of this debt are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1997 $ 80,001
1998 80,001
1999 73,318
-------------
Total $ 233,320
=============
</TABLE>
B) 10% CONVERTIBLE COLLATERALIZED DEBENTURES
In December 1995, the Company effected a private placement of $535,000 of
10% Convertible Collateralized Debentures ("Debentures"). An additional
$865,000 of these Debentures were sold in 1996. The Debentures pay
interest quarterly at 10% per year and are convertible into a share of
common stock at a conversion price of $3.50 per share. The Debentures may
be called for redemption by the Company after December 1, 1997 at premiums
ranging from 103% to 105% of face value. The Company can require
conversion if the Company's common stock trades at or above $5.50 (subject
to future adjustment) for 10 consecutive trading days. Other restrictions
or requirements for conversion, such as an effective registration
statement, also apply. The holders of the Debentures have certain demand
and other registration rights upon conversion.
The Debentures are collateralized with certain current assets (except
accounts receivable) and certain fixed assets, subject to existing
mortgage and lease obligations. As of the last day of each fiscal quarter
the collateral shall have a value of at least 150% of the amount of the
outstanding obligations and meet certain other requirements. As of
December 29, 1996, the Company was in compliance with these collateral
requirements.
The Company is subject to default provisions for not meeting collateral
requirements, failure to make timely interest payments and other standard
representations and covenants. As of December 29, 1996, the Company is in
compliance with such terms and conditions.
The Debentures are due November 30, 2000 if not converted or called prior
to maturity.
C) CAPITAL LEASES
The Company leases a variety of computer hardware and software and special
equipment for its Image Synthesis and video laboratories, and other office
equipment under capital leases. The fixed assets under capital leases are
shown in Note 6.
46
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital
leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments
as of December 29, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR
<S> <C>
1997 $ 145,000
1998 121,000
1999 32,000
2000 15,000
------------
Total minimum lease payments 313,000
Less: Amount representing interest 72,000
Present value of net minimum lease payments $ 241,000
============
</TABLE>
5. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND MAJOR CUSTOMER INFORMATION
The Company operates in two segments; technical services and products; and
optoelectronic products and services. A major portion of the Company's
total revenues has been derived from contracts, or subcontracts
thereunder, with departments or agencies of the U.S. Government, primarily
the military services and other departments and agencies of the Department
of Defense. Contract revenues from programs for the U.S. Government
accounted for approximately 83% for 1996 and 82% for 1995 of total
revenues. The revenues and operating income of each of these business
segments are separately reported in the Statements of Operations.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Technical Optoelectronic
Services Products
and and Corporate/
Products Services Other Total
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
1996
-------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Identifiable Assets $ 3,183,397 $ 1,169,313 $ 1,586,804 $ 5,939,514
Depreciation/Amortization $ 335,756 $ 214,051 $ 71,031 $ 620,838
Capital Expenditures $ 75,683 $ 162,210 $ 75,495 $ 313,388
1995
-------------------------
Identifiable Assets $ 4,660,800 $ 829,665 $ 860,073 $ 6,350,538
Depreciation/Amortization $ 286,788 $ 133,494 $ 20,226 $ 440,508
Capital Expenditures $ 559,687 $ 190,643 $ 27,637 $ 777,967
</TABLE>
47
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TECHNICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
The Company's largest contract is to support the Transportation
Safeguards Division, Department of Energy (DoE), Kirtland Air Force
Base, NM. This contract is to develop and conduct training for nuclear
materials couriers. A contract for $16.3 million for the entire project
was negotiated and definitized in March 1994. This contract is funded on
an annual basis by the DoE. The Company is in the fourth year (first
option year) for renewed support of DoE Transportation Safeguards
Division, with one following optional year. The contract accounted for
22% ($2.5 million) and 20% ($2.7 million) of segment revenues for 1996
and 1995, respectively.
The Company continues work which began in 1990 with Motorola, Inc.
assisting in the design of the Iridium(R) satellite constellation that
will provide global wireless communications to handheld telephones and
pagers. The Company's contract to perform such work amounted to over 19%
($2.2 million) of segment revenues in 1996 and 17% ($2.3 million) in
1995.
The Company has contracts with the U.S. Navy to provide engineering and
logistics support for various undersea programs. Revenues derived from
these programs were 17% ($2.0 million) and 15% ($2.0 million) of segment
revenues for 1996 and 1995, respectively.
OPTOELECTRONICS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
For 1996 and 1995, substantially all of the revenues were derived from
subcontracts from the Company's Federal Systems Division, whose
customers in turn are various departments or agencies of the U.S.
Government.
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Leases that meet the criteria requiring capitalization as specified in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 "Accounting for
Leases" are capitalized. Such assets and the related liabilities (See
Note 4) are included in the accompanying balance sheet. The balance
sheet includes the following amounts for capitalized leases.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
----------------
<S> <C>
Assets held for sale $ 1,205,409
Production and special equipment 473,566
Furniture, equipment and other 145,446
----------------
1,824,421
Less-depreciation taken 659,950
----------------
$ 1,164,471
================
</TABLE>
48
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company leases equipment and certain office facilities under operating
leases generally ranging from one to five years with options to renew. The
leases contain provisions to pay for proportionate increases in operating
costs and property taxes. The Company is committed to pay aggregate
rentals under these leases as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1997 $ 476,000
1998 276,000
1999 43,000
--------------
$ 795,000
==============
</TABLE>
Rental expense charged to operations, including payments made under
short-term leases, amounted to $741,000 and $844,000 in 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
LEASE SETTLEMENT
Effective July 1994, the Company settled a legal dispute with a former
landlord. Under the Settlement Agreement ("Agreement"), the Company agreed
to make deferred rent cash payments of $250,000; contingent cash payments
of 25% of future earnings (as defined) and 10-15% of the net proceeds from
the sale of common stock or operating assets, the total of such payments
not to exceed $550,000; an additional contingent payment up to $250,000
from any net proceeds awarded from settlement of an outstanding lawsuit;
and issued an option to purchase up to 125,000 shares of the Company's
stock at an exercise price (subject to adjustment) of $2 per share. The
option is exercisable through December 31, 2004 and has certain
registration rights upon exercise of the option. The landlord released the
Company from outstanding and future rent or other obligations arising from
the leases. Prior to 1995, the Company expensed $800,000 toward amounts
potentially due under the above terms of this Agreement and recognized a
$35,000 expense for the estimated value of the option.
The Company has made the deferred rent cash payments of $250,000. The
contingent amounts due, if any, are to be paid quarterly. The period for
computation of such contingent payments ends December 2004. Through
December 29, 1996, contingent amounts totaling approximately $242,000 have
been earned, paid and charged against the accrual. The $308,000 accrual as
of December 29, 1996 represents the remaining contingent portion which is
probable to be paid over the applicable consideration period.
Per the Agreement, the Company agreed to pay 20% not to exceed $250,000
from the settlement from the lawsuit described below. As this legal
proceeding was favorably concluded in 1996, the amount payable of $250,000
to the former landlord was expensed in this period and paid in 1996.
LEGAL PROCEEDING
In 1996, the Company and a corporate defendant reached an out-of-court
settlement of the Company's previously reported 1994 lawsuit pending in the
United States District Court in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The express terms
of the settlement, including terms regarding
49
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
the confidentiality of the settlement, were definitized and full payment
was received by the Company in 1996. Under the terms of the settlement, the
Company netted in 1996 approximately $2.2 million from this legal
settlement after payment of contingent attorney's fees of $1,525,000 and
related expenses incurred in 1996 of $234,000. The Company had expensed
approximately $384,000 in legal fees and related expenses in prior years.
7. RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company has a qualified defined contribution retirement plan, the Essex
Corporation Retirement Plan and Trust, which includes a salary reduction
401(k) feature for its employees. The Plan calls for an employer matching
contribution of up to 3% of eligible employee compensation under the salary
reduction feature and allows for a discretionary contribution.
Discretionary contributions are determined annually by the Board of
Directors. Total authorized contributions under the matching contribution
feature of the Plan were approximately $163,000 in 1996 and $145,000 in
1995. There were no discretionary contributions in these years.
In accordance with the retirement plan and trust, as amended, such
authorized contributions and the resulting annual expense can be reduced by
forfeitures by terminated employees of unvested amounts of prior years'
contributions. Forfeitures of $20,000 were utilized to reduce annual
expenses in 1996. There were no such forfeitures utilized in 1995.
8. INCOME TAXES
The Company records income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109 ("SFAS 109"), "Accounting for Income Taxes".
The components of the Company's net deferred tax asset account are as
follows as of December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Acquisition NOL and tax credit carryforward $ 328,600 $ 340,100
NOL carryforward 835,800 692,700
Tax credit carryforward 120,000 105,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts 82,600 72,100
Depreciation and amortization (142,600) (153,100)
Accrued employee benefit costs 93,300 92,100
Lease settlement accrual 107,900 132,700
Other 109,100 (66,200)
Valuation Reserve (1,534,700) (1,215,400)
-------------- -------------
Net Deferred Tax Asset $ -0- $ -0-
============== =============
</TABLE>
As a result of an acquisition, the Company has net operating loss ("NOL")
and tax credit carryforwards of approximately $726,000 and $75,000,
respectively, that are available,
50
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
subject to certain limitations, to offset future book and taxable income
and taxes payable. The net operating loss begins to expire in 2001 and the
tax credits expire through 2009. These carryforwards, when utilized, will
be used partially to offset previously recorded goodwill.
The Company also has a regular NOL of $2,388,000 and tax credit
carryforwards of $120,000 that are available, subject to certain
limitations, to offset book income and future taxes payable. The NOL and
tax credit and carryforwards expire through 2012 and 2007, respectively.
The evaluation of the realizability of such deferred tax assets in future
periods is made based upon a variety of factors for generating future
taxable income, such as intent and ability to sell assets and historical
and projected operating performance. At this time, the Company has
established a valuation reserve for all of its deferred tax assets. Such
tax assets are available to be recognized and benefit future periods.
The Company recorded no benefit or provision for income taxes in 1996. The
components of the benefit from income taxes in 1995 consisted of the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
---------------
CURRENTLY PAYABLE
<S> <C>
Federal $ (12,797)
State 5,751
---------------
(7,046)
---------------
DEFERRED
Federal --
---------------
State --
---------------
Total $ (7,046)
===============
</TABLE>
9. STOCK OPTION AND STOCK BONUS PLANS; OTHER STOCK OPTIONS
An Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan was adopted in March 1988.
This Plan reserved 850,000 shares of the Company's unissued shares for
option and stock appreciation rights ("SAR") grants. This Plan expired in
January 1997. Options, which may be tax qualified ("ISOs") and
non-qualified ("NSOs"), are exercisable for a period of up to 10 years at
prices at or above market price as established on the date of grant. The
activity in this plan for the last two years is as follows.
51
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES PRICE PER SHARE
--------------------------- -----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, 12/25/94 613,811 $ 2.50 - $ 3.00
Granted 107,550 $ 3.08 - $ 3.50
Canceled/Expired (48,500) $ 2.50 - $ 2.52
-------------
Outstanding, 12/31/95 672,861 $ 2.50 - $ 3.50
Granted 259,500 $ 3.00
Canceled/Expired (89,750) $ 2.50 - $ 3.50
Exercised (12,000) $ 2.50 - $ 2.94
-------------
Outstanding, 12/29/96 830,611 $ 2.50 - $ 3.08
=============
Exercisable, 12/29/96 595,590 $ 2.50 - $ 3.08
=============
</TABLE>
The weighted average price for options outstanding and exercisable was
$2.97 and $2.95, respectively. The weighted average life for options
outstanding and exercisable was 3.7 years and 3.0 years, respectively. As
of December 29, 1996 there were 7,389 shares available for future grants of
options or SARs. There are no SARs outstanding.
The 1996 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan ("1996 Plan") was
adopted in August 1996 and approved by the shareholders in November 1996.
This plan reserves 300,000 shares of the Company's unissued shares for
option and SAR grants. This plan expires in 2006. ISO or NSO options are
exercisable for a period up to 10 years at prices at or above market as
established on the date of the grant. No shares had been granted as of
December 29, 1996. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, the
recipient will receive payment in the form of stock, cash, or both, as
determined by the Company, equal to the appreciation in value of the shares
to which the rights were awarded. Increases and decreases in the market
price of the stock also cause an increase in or reduction to plan expense
to record the impact of the SARs outstanding.
The Incentive Stock Option Plan expired in March 1992. The Plan reserves
shares of the Company's unissued shares for options previously granted. At
December 29, 1996, there were 2,000 options granted at a price of $3.00 per
share, as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES OPTION PRICE
------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at December 25, 1994 163,400 $ 2.52 - 3.25
Expired (8,500) $ 2.52 - 3.00
------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1995 154,900 $ 2.52 - 3.25
Canceled/Expired (125,900) $ 2.52 - 3.25
Exercised (27,000) $ 2.52
------------
Outstanding and exercisable
at December 29, 1996 2,000 $ 3.00
============
</TABLE>
The Company has a Restricted Stock Bonus Plan covering key employees and
directors of the Company. The Plan can reserve up to 50,000 of the
Company's unissued shares for awards. The Board awarded 12,000 shares in
1995 and no shares in 1996. As of December 29, 1996, there were 22,050
shares available for award under the Plan.
52
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In July 1994, the Company issued an option for 125,000 shares of
unregistered common stock under a lease settlement (see Note 6). The option
is exercisable through December 31, 2004 at an exercise price of $2.00 per
share. The option price is subject to adjustment under anti-dilution
provisions of the option agreement. The optionholders have certain
registration rights for these shares of common stock.
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation". SFAS No. 123 defines a "fair value based
method" of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity
instrument. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is
recognized over the service period. The Company has historically accounted
for employee stock options or similar equity instruments under the
"intrinsic value method" as defined by APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees". Under the intrinsic value method, compensation
cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at
grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay
to acquire the stock.
SFAS No. 123 allows an entity to continue to use the intrinsic value method
and Management has elected to do so. However, entities electing to remain
with the accounting in APB Opinion No. 25 must make pro forma disclosures
of net income and earnings per share, as if the fair value based method of
accounting had been applied. Because the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting
has not been applied to options granted prior to January 1, 1995, the
resulting pro forma compensation costs may not be representative of the
cost to be expected in future years. Accordingly, net income and earnings
per share would be as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR
ENDED AS REPORTED PRO FORMA
------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
PER PER
NET LOSS SHARE NET LOSS SHARE
--------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 $ (1,333,684) $ (0.37) $ (1,446,101) $ (0.40)
1995 $ (1,427,454) $ (0.49) $ (1,470,241) $ (0.50)
</TABLE>
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for
grants in 1996 and 1995; no dividend yield, 70 percent volatility,
risk-free interest rates approximating 6 percent and expected lives of 3
to 5 years. The weighted average grant date fair value of the options
issued in 1996 and 1995 was approximately $1.75 and $1.59, respectively.
53
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. COMMON STOCK OFFERING; WARRANTS; PREFERRED STOCK
In July 1995, the Company successfully completed a $2.5 million Stock
Offering ("Offering"). The Company sold 25,000 Units for $2,500,000 and
received such proceeds less offering costs. Net proceeds of approximately
$2 million were recognized as increases to the common stock and
contributions in excess of par value accounts. Through the Offering, the
Company sold 25,000 Units consisting of 1,750,000 newly issued shares of
common stock and warrants (expiring June 30, 1998 and exercisable at $75.00
for 25 shares) to obtain an additional 625,000 new shares. Proceeds from
the Offering have been used for general business purposes including,
principally, development of commercial products. A portion of the net
proceeds ($241,000) was used to partially satisfy the contingent obligation
to the landlord.
In connection with the Offering, the Company entered into a Placement
Agency Agreement with a registered broker/dealer. In addition to cash
compensation, the broker/dealer received warrants for 175,000 shares of
common stock. The warrants are exercisable through December 1, 1999 at a
price of $2.30 per share, subject to adjustment under anti-dilution
provisions of the Warrant Agreement. The warrant holders have certain
registration rights for these shares of common stock.
In connection with the issuance of the 10% Convertible Collateralized
Debentures Due 2000, the Company has reserved approximately 400,000 shares
of common stock for conversion. In addition, the Company has issued
warrants to the broker/dealer for 28,571 shares of common stock. The
warrants are exercisable through December 1, 2000 at a price of $3.50 per
share, subject to adjustment under anti-dilution provisions of the Warrant
Agreement. The warrant holders have certain registration rights for these
shares of common stock. The Company has also issued warrants for 78,400
shares to the purchasers of the Debentures under essentially the same terms
and conditions as the warrants issued to the broker/dealer.
The Company has reserved approximately 1,307,000 shares of common stock in
connection with the convertible debentures and the possible exercise of all
such warrants.
In January 1997, a class of preferred stock was approved by the
shareholders. The Company's Articles of Incorporation were amended to
authorize a class of preferred stock, 1 million shares, par value $0.01 per
share, the series and rights of which may be designated from time-to-time
by the Board of Directors in accordance with applicable state and federal
law.
54
<PAGE>
ESSEX CORPORATION
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated March 21, 1997, included in this Form 10-KSB, into Essex
Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No.
33-47900.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Washington, D.C.,
March 21, 1997
55
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-29-1996
<CASH> 1,508
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 1,482
<ALLOWANCES> (236)
<INVENTORY> 482
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 3,628
<PP&E> 3,130
<DEPRECIATION> (2,502)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 5,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,528
<BONDS> 1,682
0
0
<COMMON> 363
<OTHER-SE> 366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 5,940
<SALES> 12,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 12,939
<CGS> 11,068
<TOTAL-COSTS> 16,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 2,010
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 143
<INCOME-PRETAX> (1,334)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (1,334)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (1,334)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED> (.37)
</TABLE>
