ALLEGHENY ENERGY INC
8-K/A, 1998-06-12
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: ALLEGHENY ENERGY INC, 8-K, 1998-06-12
Next: AMERICAN BANCORPORATION /WV/, 424B3, 1998-06-12



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K/A

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


         Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 12, 1998


                              ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



         Maryland                       1-267                  13-5531602
(State or other jurisdiction      (Commission File           (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)                 Number)           Identification Number)

                             10435 Downsville Pike
                              Hagerstown, MD 21740
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number,
  including area code:                                           (301) 790-3400


<PAGE>

ITEM 1-4.  INAPPLICABLE

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

         On May 29, 1998, the  Pennsylvania  Public Utility  Commission  ("PUC")
issued final orders on the stand-alone  restructuring plan ("Stand-Alone  Plan")
filed by West Penn Power Company  ("West  Penn"),  a wholly owned  subsidiary of
Allegheny Energy ("AYE") Inc., and on the application for approval to merger and
restructuring  plan  ("Restructuring  Plan")  filed by DQE,  Inc.  and AYE.  The
restructuring  plans were filed in  compliance  with the  Pennsylvania  Electric
Generation  Customer Choice and Competition Act ("Customer  Choice Act"),  which
permits retail electric customers a choice of generation supplier and authorizes
utilities to recover their known and  measurable  transition or stranded  costs.
The PUC's final orders are  described  below.  On June 12, AYE filed motions for
reconsideration of both orders.

                     Orders on West Penn's Stand-Alone Plan
                     --------------------------------------

         The PUC  ordered a phase-in  of  customer  choice  under the  following
timetable:  on January 1, 1999, 33% of the peak load of each customer class will
be eligible for direct access;  on January 2, 1999, 66% of the peak load of each
customer class will be eligible for direct  access;  and on January 2, 2000, all
customers will be eligible for direct access.

         With respect to stranded cost recovery,  the PUC's order on West Penn's
Stand-Alone  Plan denied in part and  accepted in part West  Penn's  claim.  The
PUC's  order  disallows  recovery  of  approximately  $1 billion of West  Penn's
stranded  cost  claim  (net  present  value,  pre-tax).  The  PUC's  order  sets
transition costs using an  administrative  forecast of generation  market values
and costs. Of the disallowed  amount,  approximately $830 million relates to the
impact of the  determination  of  generation  market value and costs.  The other
disallowances  relate to regulatory  assets,  non-utility  generation  and other
transition  costs. AYE will seek  reconsideration  and/or judicial review of the
stranded cost disallowances and other aspects of the PUC's order.

         AYE  continues  to review  the  financial  impact  of the PUC's  order.
Ultimately,  future  financial  effects  will  depend on the number of West Penn
customers  who choose to chose a generation  suppliers  other than West Penn and
the market price of electricity during the transition period, each of which will
affect West Penn's  ability to recover  its costs.  West Penn  expects to take a
charge to earnings to reflect disallowances in the order, if the PUC's order, as
issued,  remains  unchanged,   of  $400  million  to  $500  million,   including
approximately $200 million related to the Beaver Valley  non-utility  generation
contract.

         West Penn will  account  for the  impacts  of the PUC order by taking a
charge to its earnings for the second  quarter  ending June 30, 1998 if there is
no change in the PUC's order.


                                       -2-


<PAGE>


             Order on Merger and Restructuring Plan Under the Merger
             -------------------------------------------------------

         The PUC's final order on the merger  proceeding  allows the transaction
to be  consummated  but imposed  certain  conditions  to be  satisfied  prior to
closing.  The  conditions  relate  to the  mitigation  of market  power  through
membership  in an  independent  system  operator  ("ISO"),  an entity that would
operate  the  transmission  facilities  of DQE/AYE  and other  utilities  in the
region.  The PUC order will allow DQE and AYE to satisfy this condition  through
their  current  membership in the Midwest ISO, but the PUC held that the Midwest
ISO must be "fully  functional" and it must satisfy seven criteria  specified by
the PUC before the merger is consummated.

         AYE does not expect that these  conditions can be satisfied  within the
time periods  specified in the Merger Agreement.  The Merger Agreement  provides
that either party may  terminate the Agreement on October 5, 1998 if closing has
not occurred by that date or, under certain  limited  circumstances  relating to
the  non-receipt of regulatory  approvals,  closing has not occurred by April 5,
1999.  The Midwest ISO is not  expected to be fully  operational  until June 30,
2000. In addition,  the Midwest ISO, as presently constituted and as proposed to
the  Federal  Energy  Regulatory  Commission,  does not meet the seven  criteria
specified by the PUC.

         The PUC's order also  addressed the companies'  Restructuring  Plan for
the recovery of stranded costs by DQE's wholly owned Subsidiary,  Duquesne,  and
West Penn in the event the merger is consummated. The order on the Restructuring
Plan sets transition costs using an administrative forecast of generation market
values  and  costs.  The result  for West Penn is  described  above.  Applied to
Duquesne,  this  methodology  results in disallowance of a portion of Duquesne's
stranded costs claim. The order also reduces Duquesne's and West Penn's stranded
costs  recovery by $152 million and $71  million,  respectively,  for  estimated
generation-related  merger  synergies  and  reduces  Duquesne's  and West Penn's
distribution  rates  beginning  January 1, 2000 by $16  million  and $9 million,
respectively,   annually  to  reflect  estimated   distribution-related   merger
synergies.

         AYE has filed a motion for  reconsideration of both orders and may file
appeals if necessary.  As part of its motion for  reconsideration  of the merger
order,  AYE has offered certian interim  measures to mitigate market power until
the PUC is satisfied  that the Midwest ISO or other  measures  have resolved any
market  power  concerns.  There  can  be no  assurance  that  the  disallowances
associated  with the Merger and  Restructuring  Plan or other merger  conditions
will be modified by the PUC on reconsideration or on appeal.

ITEMS 6-9.  INAPPLICABLE


                                       -3-


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has duly  caused  this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                        ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Thomas K. Henderson
                                            -----------------------------------
                                              Name:  Thomas K. Henderson
                                              Title:   Vice President

Dated:  June 12, 1998


                                       -4-



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission