ALLEGHENY ENERGY INC
U-1, 2000-07-06
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: ALLEGHENY ENERGY INC, 35-CERT, 2000-07-06
Next: ALLEGHENY ENERGY INC, U-1, EX-99, 2000-07-06




                      File No. 70-9***
             (Conemaugh Acquisition Application)

             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                    Washington, DC  20549

                          FORM U-1

                  APPLICATION / DECLARATION

                            UNDER

       THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935
               ______________________________

                   Allegheny Energy, Inc.
                    10435 Downsville Pike
                    Hagerstown, MD  21740

            Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC
                   R.R. 12, P.O. Box 1000
                     Roseytown, PA 15601
                _____________________________

                   Allegheny Energy, Inc.
                    10435 Downsville Pike
                    Hagerstown, MD  21740

 The Commission is requested to send copies of all notices, orders
  and communications in connection with this Application /
                       Declaration to:

                  Thomas K. Henderson, Esq.
             Vice President and General Counsel
                   Allegheny Energy, Inc.
                    10435 Downsville Pike
                    Hagerstown, MD 21740

                   Patricia J. Clark, Esq.
                   Deputy General Counsel
            Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC
                   R.R. 12, P.O. Box 1000
                     Roseytown, PA 15601

                    Anthony Wilson, Esq.
                       Senior Attorney
            Allegheny Energy Service Corporation
                    10435 Downsville Pike
                    Hagerstown, MD  21740


<PAGE>


                    TABLE OF CONTENTS                        Page


Item 1.  Description of the Proposed Transaction  . . . . .  .  3

Item 2.  Fees, Commissions and Expenses . . . . . . . . . .. .  6

Item 3.  Applicable Statutory Provisions  . . . . . . . . . .   6

Item 4.  Regulatory Approvals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11

Item 5.  Procedure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11

Item 6.  Exhibits and Financial Statements  . . . . . . . . .  11

Item 7.  Information as to Environmental Effects  . . . . . .  12

Exhibit H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14

<PAGE>



Item 1.   Description of Proposed Transactions

          A.   Summary

      Allegheny  Energy,  Inc. ("Allegheny"),  a  registered
public  utility holding company, and Allegheny Energy Supply
Company, LLC  ("Allegheny   Supply"),<F1>   a   non-utility
generating  company subsidiary of Allegheny, have  filed  an
application  -  declaration pursuant to Sections  9(a),  10,
and 11(b) of the Act and Rules 53 and 54 under the Act.

     Now come Allegheny and  Allegheny  Supply <F2>  seeking
Securities    and    Exchange   Commission    ("Commission")
authorization  to  acquire  50% of  Potomac  Electric  Power
Company's  ("Pepco")  total interest  of  166  MW  ("Pepco's
Interest")  in  the  1,711  MW generating  capacity  of  the
Conemaugh  Generating  Station  and  the  related  Auctioned
Assets and Assumed Obligations ("Transaction").<F3> The total
purchase price is $152.5 million, subject to adjustment  for
storeroom  and  coal  pile inventories.  Each  of  Allegheny
Supply and PPL Global, Inc. will be entitled to one-half  of
the  capacity  and energy associated with Pepco's  Interest.
The  purchase  price  and any adjustment  are  to  be  split
equally  between  Allegheny  Supply  and  PPL  Global,  Inc.
Allegheny  Supply  and  PPL  Global,  Inc.  will  each   pay
approximately $76.25 million for their respective shares  of
Pepco's  Interest or approximately $918 per  kW  -  a  price
consistent with other recent auctions of utility assets.  It
is  requested that the Commission issue an order authorizing
this Transaction on or before September 1, 2000.  Closing is
scheduled for October 1, 2000.

          B.   Background

            1.   The Transaction

     Allegheny  Supply,  PPL Global, Inc.,  and  Pepco  have
entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated  May
18,  2000 ("Agreement") under which Allegheny Supply and PPL
Global,  Inc.,  a  subsidiary of PPL Corp.,  will    jointly
purchase   Pepco's   Interest in  the  Conemaugh  Generating
Station  ("Conemaugh").  Conemaugh is a 1,711-MW  coal-fired
generating  station located in Indiana County, Pennsylvania.
Pepco's Interest is a 9.72% interest as tenants in common of
Conemaugh.    After  the  close  of  the  Transaction,   the
Allegheny  system will have a total generating  capacity  of
approximately 10,000 MW.  The Transaction will be  accounted
for  as a purchase and be accretive to Allegheny's  earnings
in  the first full year.  Allegheny proposes to finance  the

<F1>  In File No. 70-9483, Holding Co. Act Release No.  27101
(November 12, 1999), the Commission authorized the formation
and financing of Allegheny Supply.
<F2>  Allegheny Supply is a public utility as defined under the
Act.    However, for purposes of state regulation  Allegheny
Supply  is  not regulated as a public utility.  Accordingly,
Allegheny Supply's acquisition of  utility assets  does  not
fall  within Section 9(b) of the Act and therefore  approval
by the Commission is required.
<F3>  The purchase includes Pepco's 9.72% interest in Conemaugh
together with corresponding interests in "Auctioned  Assets"
and "Assumed Obligations" as defined in sections 2.2 and 2.3
of the Agreement.


<PAGE>


purchase  through the issuance of to-be-authorized long-term
debt with the possible use of short-term debt as a temporary
bridge  should market conditions warrant it. The acquisition
marks Allegheny's entrance into the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-
Maryland ("PJM")<F4> market as an owner of  generation.<F5>  The
completion  of  the  Transaction  is  subject  to  customary
conditions and approvals of various regulatory commissions,
including  the  Federal  Energy Regulatory  Commission,  the
Federal  Trade  Commission/Department of  Justice,  and  the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

           2.  Description of the Parties

     Pepco   is  an  investor-owned  utility  that  provides
electric   and   other  utility  services  to  governmental,
commercial,  and  residential customers in  the  Washington,
D.C. metropolitan area and the surrounding Maryland suburbs.
Pepco  serves  approximately 700,000 electricity  customers.
Pepco,  through  its  family  of  unregulated  subsidiaries,
offers  natural gas, high-speed Internet access,  local  and
long   distance  telephone,  cable  television  and   energy
management services in the Mid-Atlantic region.  Pepco is  a
member of PJM and will continue as a member.

     PPL   Global   is  the  international  and  development
affiliate  of PPL Corp.  PPL Corp., through its subsidiaries
and affiliates, delivers electricity and natural gas to more
than   1.3   million  customers  in  Pennsylvania;   markets
wholesale or retail energy in 43 states and Canada; provides
energy  services  for  businesses in  the  Mid-Atlantic  and
Northeast  United  States; generates  electricity  at  power
plants  in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Montana; and, delivers
electricity to 1.4 million customers in Britain and to  more
than 800,000 customers in Chile, Bolivia and El Salvador.

     Allegheny    is    a   diversified   energy    company,
headquartered   in   Hagerstown,  Md.   Allegheny,   through
Allegheny  Supply, is a producer and marketer of electricity
and  other  energy products.  The Allegheny family  includes
West  Penn Power Company, Monongahela Power Company and  The
Potomac   Edison  Company  (collectively  d/b/a   "Allegheny
Power").   Allegheny  Power  delivers  electric  energy  and
natural  gas  to about three million people or  1.4  million
customers   in   parts  of  Maryland,  Ohio,   Pennsylvania,
Virginia,  and West Virginia.  Allegheny Ventures,  Inc.,  a
non-utility subsidiary of Allegheny, actively invests in and
develops  energy-related  and  telecommunications  projects.
Allegheny  Supply  owns,  operates and  markets  competitive
retail  and  wholesale  electric generation.   Additionally,
Allegheny  Supply  manages and operates electric  generation
owned by the regulated utilities d/b/a Allegheny Power  that
has not yet been deregulated.

     For   the  twelve  months  ended  December  31,   1999,
Allegheny's  revenues  were  approximately  $2.81   billion.
Allegheny  Supply,  which  began  operating  as  a  separate

<F4> "PJM" means the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland
interconnected power pool operated under the PJM Agreement
and any successor thereto including any regional
transmission operator, independent system operator,
transmission company, or any other independent system
administrator that possesses operational or planning control
over the Transmission System.
<F5> Currently, Allegheny  companies  are  both  members  and
customers of PJM.


<PAGE>


company on November 18, 1999,<F6> had revenues of approximately
$141 million or 5.02% of Allegheny's annual revenues.

          C.   Post Transaction Management and Operations


     Allegheny, through Allegheny Supply, continues  towards
its  goal  of moving from its current status as  a  regional
provider  of utility services to that of becoming a national
energy  supplier.   In  1999,  Allegheny   added  88  MW  of
generating  capacity in Springdale, Pennsylvania.  Allegheny
Supply  is  also  planning  to  construct  a   540   MW   at
Springdale,  Pennsylvania.   Additionally, Allegheny  Supply
is  in the process of installing 220 MW of natural gas fired
combustion  turbine generation at various  sites  throughout
Pennsylvania. Allegheny Supply intends to utilize its  share
of  the  Conemaugh  capacity  in its existing  portfolio  of
generation.

      After  closing, Conemaugh will continue to be operated
under    current    agreements   including    an    existing
interconnection agreement by and among the Conemaugh Station
Owners  and the Conemaugh Switching Station Owners  for  the
Conemaugh     Station    (dated    November    19,     1999)
("Interconnection    Agreement"); <F7>  Conemaugh  Operating
Agreement (dated December 1, 1967); <F8> and other contracts as
set forth in Section 2.2(a)(iv) of the Agreement, subject to
Section  2.4, those contracts, agreements, personal property
leases,   commitments   and  all   other   legally   binding
arrangements, whether oral or written, to which Seller is  a
party,  or  by which the Seller or its Auctioned  Assets  is
bound  or subject, relating to the ownership, operation  and
maintenance  of  the  Generating Facility,  including  those
contracts and agreements set forth in Schedule 2.2(a)(iv) of
the  Agreement  (excluding any such  contracts,  agreements,
personal  property  leases, commitments  and  other  legally
binding arrangements to the extent the same relate to any of
the  assets  retained by Pepco) to the extent in full  force
and effect on the closing date.

          D.   Financing

     Applicants   propose   to   ultimately   finance    the
Transaction  utilizing  Allegheny  Supply's  long-term  debt
authority,  for  which  Commission  authorization  has  been
requested in File  No. 70-9677. <F9>  No additional long-term
debt  financing  authorization is requested  at  this  time.
However,  due  to possible movements in interest  rates  and
volatility  in  the  bond market, it may  be  necessary  for
Allegheny   Supply   to  use  temporary   short-term   debt,
including,  but  not limited to, commercial paper  and/or  a

<F6>  See Holding Co. Act Release No. 27101,  the  Commission
authorized the formation and financing of Allegheny Supply.
<F7>  Section  2.2(a)(iv)  of  the  Agreement  provides  that
Auctioned Assets includes the Interconnection Agreement.
<F8>  The Operating Agreement was originally entered into among
Pennsylvania   Electric  Company,  Atlantic  City   Electric
Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Delmarva  Power
&  Light  Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, Pennsylvania
Power   &  Light  Company,  Philadelphia  Electric  Company,
Potomac Electric Power Company, Public Service Electric  and
Gas  Company  and  UGI  Corporation,  with  respect  to  the
ownership  and  operation of Conemaugh Station,  as  amended
from time to time.
<F9> See File No. 70-9677, Application for General Financing
Authorization (filed March 21, 2000).


<PAGE>


bank  credit facility as a bridge to the permanent financing
of  the Transaction.  Accordingly, Allegheny Supply requests
authorization  to  issue temporary short-term  debt,  in  an
amount  not  to  exceed $80 million.   This  request  is  in
addition to short-term debt authorized for Allegheny  Supply
by  this  Commission in Holding Co. Act Release  No.  27101,
wherein   the   Commission  authorized  the  formation   and
financing of Allegheny Supply, or as subsequently amended in
File No. 70-9677.

Item No. 2.    Fees, Commissions and Expenses

     The fees, commissions and expenses to be paid or
incurred, directly or indirectly, in connection with this
Transaction are ______________ (to be filed by amendment).

Item No. 3.    Applicable Statutory Provisions

      The following sections of the Act and the Commission's
rules  thereunder  are  or  may be  directly  or  indirectly
applicable to the proposed Transaction: Sections  9(a),  10,
and  11(b)  of the Act and Rules 53, and 54. To  the  extent
that  other  sections of the Act or the  Commission's  rules
thereunder  are  deemed applicable to the Transaction,  such
sections  and rules should be considered to be set forth  in
this Item 3.

     A.   Legal Analysis

               1.   Section 10(c)

     Section 10(c) of the Act provides that, notwithstanding
the provisions of Section 10(b), the Commission shall not
approve:

     1. an acquisition of securities or utility assets, or of
        any other interest,   which is unlawful under the provisions
        of Section 8 or is detrimental to the carrying out of the
        provisions of Section 11; or

     2. the acquisition of securities or utility assets of a
        public utility or holding company unless the Commission
        finds that such acquisition will serve the public interest
        by  tending towards the economical and the  efficient
        development of an integrated public utility system . . .

Sections 8 and 11 apply to registered holding companies  and
are  therefore  applicable  to  Allegheny,  since  it  is  a
registered holding company.

     Section  11(a)  of the Act requires the  Commission  to
examine   the  corporate  structure  of  registered  holding
companies  to  ensure  that  unnecessary  complexities   are
eliminated  and  voting  powers  are  fairly  and  equitably
distributed.  As described above, the Transaction  will  not
result  in unnecessary complexities or unfair voting powers.
In  this Transaction there would be no change to the current
corporate structure.

          2.  Section 10(b)(2)

               i.     Fairness of Consolidated Corporate Structure


<PAGE>


     Section 10(b)(2) requires the Commission not to approve
an   acquisition   if   the  Commission   finds   that   the
consideration  is "not reasonable or does not  bear  a  fair
relation to the sums invested in or the earning capacity  of
the utility assets to be acquired ."  As earlier stated, the
total   purchase  price  is  $152.5  million,   subject   to
adjustment   for   storeroom  and  coal  pile   inventories.
Allegheny   Supply's  share  of  the   purchase   price   is
approximately  $76.25  million  for  Pepco's   Interest   or
approximately  $918 per kW - a price consistent  with  other
recent  auctions of utility assets.  The purchase  price  is
the resulting of a bidding and negotiation process.

     In  the  Commission's recent American  Electric  Power,
Inc. - Central South West Corporation Merger Order,<F10> the
Commission,  among other things, held that a purchase  price
is  not unfair or unreasonable within the meaning of section
10(b)(2)   if  the  price  is  the  result  of  arm's-length
negotiations.   The  decision is  equally  applicable  here.
Specifically,  the  bid  was  preceded  by  due   diligence,
analysis  and  evaluation  of the  assets,  liabilities  and
business  prospects of the acquisition.  For  these  reasons
the  Commission should find that the purchase price  is  not
unfair   or  unreasonable  within  the  meaning  of  section
10(b)(2).

               ii.    Electric System - Section 2(a)(29)(A)

     For  the reasons set forth below, the Transaction  will
not be detrimental to the carrying out of the provisions  of
Section  11.  As applied to electric utility companies,  the
term  "integrated  public  utility  system"  is  defined  in
Section 2(a)(29)(A) of the Act as:

          ".  A  system consisting of one or more  units  of
          generating plants and/or transmission lines and/or
          distributing  facilities,  whose  utility  assets,
          whether  owned  by  one or more  electric  utility
          companies,   are   physically  interconnected   or
          capable  of  physical  interconnection  and  which
          under   normal   conditions  may  be  economically
          operated   as   a   single   interconnected    and
          coordinated system confined in its operation to  a
          single area or region, in one or more states,  not
          so  large  as to impair (considering the state  of
          the  art  and  the  area or region  affected)  the
          advantages  of  localized  management,   efficient
          operation, and the effectiveness of regulation..."<F11>

The   Transaction  satisfies  the  requirements  of  Section
2(a)(29)(A)  of the Act.  First, Allegheny Supply   will  be
interconnected   with  Conemaugh  via  the   Interconnection
Agreement  and  by  use of PJM general transmission  service
agreements.<F12> Second, Allegheny Supply intends to combine

<F10> See, American Electric Power - Central South West Merger
Order, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27186 (June 14, 2000)
("AEP-CSW Order").
<F11>  See  Section 2(a)(29)(A), See Also Environmental Action,
Inc. v. Securities and Exch. Commission, 895 F.2d 1255, 1263
(9th Cir. 1990) (citing In re Electric Energy, Inc., 38  SEC
658, 668 (1958)).
<F12>  The  PJM  Open Access Transmission Tariff provides  for
transmission service within the PJM Control Area,  including
schedules, appendices, or exhibits attached thereto,  as  in
effect from time to time and as amended or modified.


<PAGE>


and  coordinate its share of  the Conemaugh  capacity   with
the  existing   Allegheny  system  generation  as  a  single
coordinated system.  Finally, Allegheny Supply  is, and will
continue to be, effectively regulated by this Commission.

               (1)  Interconnection

     As stated, Conemaugh will continue to be operated under
current agreements - including the Interconnection Agreement
by  and among the Conemaugh Station Owners and the Conemaugh
Switching Station Owners for the Conemaugh  Station;<F13> the
Conemaugh  Operating Agreement; and other contracts  as  set
forth in Section 2.2(a)(iv) of the Agreement.

      Additionally, the Commission has previously  indicated
that a single integrated system exists even based solely  on
a   planned,  future  interconnection,  provided  that  such
physical  interconnection is "contemplated or  ...  possible
within  the  reasonably near future" and not just  something
that "might occur in the remote future, and whose occurrence
has not been foreshadowed by any facts shown in the record."<F14>
As  stated,  Allegheny Supply presently has, or can  readily
acquire, transmission service under the PJM Tariff.  In  the
Matter  of  Cities Service Power & Light Corporation,<F15> the
Commission held that the integration standard was met  where
the   applicant   was  contemplating  the  construction   of
interconnection  facilities.  Similarly,  in  approving  the
application  of  New Century Energies to  combine  the  then
Public  Service Company of Colorado and Southwestern  Public
Service,    the   Commission   approved   the    application
notwithstanding  the  fact  that no  actual  interconnection
existed - only a proposed interconnection in five years.<F16>

                (2) Single Interconnected and Coordinated System

      The  Transaction will result in significant  benefits,
economies   and  efficiencies  for  Allegheny   Supply   and
Allegheny  Power  and  in turn customers  and  shareholders.
Specifically, Allegheny Supply will use its energy expertise
and  resources to market and trade its share of  the  energy
generated  at Conemaugh.  Upon completion of the Transaction
the  Allegheny system will not be so large as to impair  the
advantages of localized management, efficient operations, or
the  effectiveness of regulation.  Local management will  be
unchanged.

<F13> See Agreement at section 2.2(iv).
<F14> In  the  Matter of the North American Company  and  Its
Subsidiaries,  Holding Co. Act Release No.  4505  (Apr.  15,
1942).   See  Also,  In  the Matter of  Hudson  River  Power
Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No. 2415 (Dec. 9, 1940)
(integration standard not met where "the record discloses no
definite plan for bringing about any such interconnection");
In  the  Matter of Cities Service Power & Light Corporation,
Holding   Co.   Act  Release  No.  5256  (Aug.   30,   1944)
(integration  standard  met where  "Derby  contemplates  the
construction of such interconnection facilities").
<F15>  Holding Co. Act Release No. 5256 (Aug. 30, 1944)
<F16>  See  New  Century  Energies, Holding  Co.  Act  Release
No.26748 (August 1, 1997).


<PAGE>



               (3)  Single Area or Region

     Allegheny Supply's share of Conemaugh's generation will
be  used  to  service the current and future  energy  supply
needs  of  Allegheny  Supply's customers.  This  Transaction
provides an opportunity for the Commission to follow certain
of  the interpretive recommendations made by the Division of
Investment Management (the "Division") in the report  issued
by  the  Division in June 1995 entitled "The  Regulation  of
Public Utility Holding  Companies"  ("1995   Report").<F17>
Allegheny  Supply's acquisition of Conemaugh  is  consistent
with the 1995 Report.  Specifically, in the 1995 Report, the
Division  recommended that primacy be given to "demonstrated
economies   and  efficiencies  to  satisfy  the  integration
requirements."   Allegheny  Supply  has   demonstrated   the
requisite economies and efficiencies.
     As  the  Commission noted in the recent AEP-CSW  Order,
the "single area or region" standard implicitly requires the
Commission  to  consider the size of the system  that  would
result.<F18> The Commission further noted that section 10(c)(2)
required  the  Commission  to  consider  the  size  of   the
resulting system before approving an acquisition, but,  like
section  10(b)(1),  imposes  no precise  limits  on  holding
company  growth.   Rather,  these sections  are  couched  in
discretionary terms and require the Commission  to  exercise
its  best  judgment  as to the maximum  size  of  a  holding
company in a particular area, considering the state  of  the
art and the area or region affected. The Act does not define
the  terms "area" and "region." The terms, by their  nature,
as   the   Commission  noted  in  the  AEP-CSW  Order,   are
susceptible   of  flexible  interpretation,  which   permits
holding  companies to respond to the current  state  of  the
industry and to give the terms practical meaning and effect.<F19>
The  determination  of whether to permit  enlargement  of  a
system by acquisition is to be made on the basis of all  the
circumstances, not on the basis of preconceived  notions  of
size.
     The  Commission has held that the single area or region
test  should  be  applied flexibly when doing  so  does  not
undercut  the  policies of the Act "against scatteration  --
the  ownership of widely dispersed utility properties  which
do  not lend themselves to efficient operation and effective
state  regulation."<F20> The Commission has not required  that
combining  systems be contiguous for the requirement  to  be
met.<F21>   The Commission in the AEP-CSW  Order  noted  that

<F17>  Applicants note that the Transaction and the  requests
contained  in this Application/Declaration are  well  within
the precedent of transactions approved by the Commission  as
consistent with the Act prior to the 1995 Report  and  could
be approved without any reference to the 1995 Report.
<F18> AEP-CSW Order at pg. 50.
<F19> Id,
<F20> NIPSCO Industries, Inc., Holding Co. Act Release No. 26975
(Feb. 10, 1999) ("NIPSCO") (applying single area or region
requirement to gas utility system).
<F21> See,  e.g., Conectiv, Inc., Holding Co. Act Release  No.
26832   (Feb.  25,  1998)  ("Conectiv");  cf.  New   Century
Energies,  supra  note 48 (finding that  electric  utilities
located  in  two  different power pools,  in  two  different
reliability  councils,  in  both  the  Eastern  and  Western
Interconnects, and with a physical separation of  300  miles
were  in  the  same area or region); Electric Energy,  supra
note  44 (utility assets were within the same area or region
as  the  acquirer's service area despite a distance  of  100
miles  crossing  two states); Mississippi Valley  Generating
Co.,  Holding  Co.  Act  Release No. 12794  (Feb.  9,  1955)
(single area or region test met where generating station was
located  150  air  miles from the territory  served  by  the
acquiring company).


<PAGE>


distance  raised many more barriers to integration when  the
Act  was  passed in 1935 than is the case today.   The  1995
Report  recognized  that  "recent institutional,  legal  and
technological  changes  .  .  . have  reduced  the  relative
importance  of . . . geographical limitations by  permitting
greater  control, coordination and efficiencies"  and  "have
expanded  the  means  for achieving the interconnection  and
economic  operation and coordination of utilities with  non-
contiguous service territories."<F22> Advances and developments
are  breaking  down traditional boundaries and  concepts  of
regions.

     As  described in this application, the circumstances of
this Transaction compare favorably to those approved in  the
AEP-CSW  Order.   First, Conemaugh is fewer  than  five  (5)
miles  from  the  northeast edge of  the  Allegheny  system;
second,  the  Allegheny system will be  interconnected  with
Conemaugh  via the Interconnection Agreement and by  use  of
PJM  general  transmission service  agreements;  and  third,
Allegheny Supply intends to combine and coordinate its share
of  the Conemaugh output with the existing Allegheny system.
     For  these reasons the Commission should find that  the
"single area or region" requirement is satisfied.

               (4)  Effective State Regulation

     The  Transaction  will not impair the effectiveness  of
state  regulation  as the Transaction  will  not  impact  or
change  existing  state regulation of Allegheny  Power,  nor
will  the  Transaction impact state regulation of  Allegheny
Supply  as  it  is  not  subject  to  state  regulation  for
purposes  of  this Transaction.  However,  Pepco's  sale  is
subject  to  the  jurisdiction of, and  Pepco  has  received
preliminary approval from, both the Maryland Public  Service
Commission   and   District  of  Columbia   Public   Service
Commission.

     Pursuant  to the recommendations contained in the  1995
Report,   state  commission approval is significant  as  the
Division  stated therein "when the affected state and  local
regulators  concur,  the [Commission] should  interpret  the
integration  standard  flexibly  to  permit  non-traditional
systems  if  the standards of the Act are otherwise  met."<F23>
In  this  application the standards of the Act are  met  and
the Commission should authorize the Transaction.

<F22>  1995  Report, supra note 91, at 69-70. The  1995  Report
noted that the concept of "geographic integration" has  been
affected  by  "technological  advances  on  the  ability  to
transmit electric energy economically over longer distances,
and  other developments in the industry, such as brokers and
marketers." Id. at 69.
<F23> 1995 Report at 74.


<PAGE>


               (5)  Rule 54 Compliance

     Rule  54  provides that the Commission, in  determining
whether  to  approve certain transactions by such registered
holding  company or its subsidiaries other than with respect
to  exempt wholesale generators ("EWG") and foreign  utility
companies  ("FUCO"), will not consider  the  effect  of  the
capitalization or earnings of any subsidiary which is an EWG
or  FUCO upon the registered holding company system  if  the
provisions  of  Rule 53(a), (b) and (c) are  satisfied.   At
December   31,  1999,  Allegheny's   consolidated   retained
earnings  were  approximately $897 million, and  Allegheny's
aggregate  investment  in EWGs and FUCOs  was  approximately
$4.2  million.   Accordingly, Allegheny  may  invest  up  to
approximately $448.5 million or an additional $444.3 million
(50%  of Retained Earnings less existing investment) in EWGs
and FUCOs as of December 31, 1999.   When the Transaction is
consummated,  for  purposes  of  compliance  with  Rule  54,
Allegheny's aggregate investment in EWGs and FUCOs will  not
exceed  50%  of its consolidated retained earnings  and  the
provisions of Rule 53(a) will be satisfied.

      Allegheny further states that for purposes of Rule 54,
the  conditions  specified in Rule 53(a) are  satisfied  and
that none of the conditions set forth in rule 53(b) exist or
will  exist as a result of the proposed Transaction.   As  a
result,  the  Commission  will not consider  the  effect  on
Allegheny of a subsidiary that is an EWG or FUCO, as each is
defined  in sections 32 and 33 of the Act, respectively,  in
determining whether to approve the proposed Transaction.

Item No. 4.    Regulatory Approvals

     Filings will be made with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission  under  the  Federal  Power  Act  and  with   the
Department of Justice under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.

      No  regulatory agency, other than this Commission  and
those   mentioned   above,   has   jurisdiction   over   the
Transaction.

Item No. 5.    Procedure

      It  is  requested that the Commission's order granting
this  Application  /  Declaration be  issued  on  or  before
September  1,  2000, inasmuch as closing is anticipated  for
October 1, 2000.  There should be no recommended decision by
a hearing or other responsible officer of the Commission and
no  30-day  waiting  period  between  the  issuance  of  the
Commission's  order  and  its  effective  date.    Applicant
consents to the Division of Corporate Regulation's assisting
in the preparation of the Commission's decision and order in
this  matter,  unless the Division opposes  the  Transaction
covered by this Application or Declaration.

Item No. 6.    Exhibits and Financial Statements

          (a)  Exhibits


<PAGE>



               B-1  Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement (to be
                    filed by amendment)

               D-1  Application   to   the  Federal   Energy
                    Regulatory  Commission (to be  filed  by
                    amendment)

               D-2  Order  of  the Federal Energy Regulatory
                    Commission
                    (to be filed by amendment)

               D-3  Hart-Scott Rodino Notification Filing
                    (to be filed by amendment)

                E   Map  showing combined service  territory
                    of  Allegheny   and Conemaugh  (gas  and
                    electric)
                    (to be filed by paper on Form SE)

                F   Opinion  of  Counsel  (to  be  filed  by
                    amendment)

                G   Financial Data Schedules (to be filed by
                    amendment)

                H   Form of Notice

          (b)  Financial Statements as of March 31, 2000

                FS-1 Allegheny Supply balance sheet, per books and pro
                     forma  (to be filed by amendment).

                FS-2 Allegheny Supply statement  of  income and
                     retained earnings, per books and pro forma (to be
                     filed by amendment).

Item No. 7.    Information as to Environmental Effects

          (a)  For the reasons set forth in Item 1 above, the
               authorization applied for herein does not require major
               federal action significantly affecting the quality of the
               human environment for purposes of Section 102(2)(C)of
               the a National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
               4232(2)(C)).

          (b)  Not applicable.


                          SIGNATURE

      Pursuant  to  the requirements of the  Public  Utility
Holding  Company  Act of 1935, the undersigned  company  has
duly caused this statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


<PAGE>



                         ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.

                         /s/ THOMAS K.HENDERSON

                         By _____________________________
                         Thomas K. Henderson


                         ALLEGHENY ENERGY SUPPLY  COMPANY

                         /s/ THOMAS K. HENDERSON

                         By _____________________________
                         Thomas K. Henderson

Dated:  July 5, 2000






© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission